As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 22, 2010
File No. 001-34679
 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
______________
 
Amendment No. 6 to
 
FORM 10
______________
 
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
Pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware 27-0986328
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS employer identification no.)
incorporation or organization)

3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150
Malvern, PA 19355
 
(Address of principal executive offices)
484-321-5300
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Common Stock, $0.10 par value New York Stock Exchange
(Title of Class) (Exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer  x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o





Item 1. Business
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 2. Financial Information
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 3. Properties
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 4. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
2
 


Item 5. Directors and Executive Officers
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 6. Executive Compensation
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 8. Legal Proceedings
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 9. Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 10. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
Not applicable
 
3
 


Item 11. Description of Registrant’s Securities to be Registered
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 12. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 13. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
The following sections of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, are hereby incorporated by reference:
Item 14. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
Not applicable
 
Item 15. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 
The following section of our information statement, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10, is hereby incorporated by reference:
Exhibits      
3.1 †††   Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
   
3.2 Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
    
8.1   Tax Opinion of Pepper Hamilton LLP
     
10.1  
Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (“Vishay Intertechnology”)
 
10.2 ††   Form of Tax Matters Agreement between the Registrant and Vishay Intertechnology

4
 


Exhibits, continued
10.3 ††††       Form of Trademark License Agreement between Registrant and Vishay Intertechnology
 
10.4 †††   Form of Employee Matters Agreement between the Registrant and Vishay Intertechnology
 
10.5 †††   Form of Transition Services Agreement between the Registrant and Vishay Intertechnology
 
10.6 * †† Form of Supply Agreement between Vishay Advanced Technology, Ltd., a subsidiary of the Registrant as Supplier and Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Buyer.
 
10.7 †† Form of Secondment Agreement between the Registrant and Vishay Intertechnology
 
10.8 * †† Form of Patent License Agreement between the Registrant and Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology
 
10.9  
Form of Real Property Lease Agreement between Vishay Advanced Technology, Ltd., a subsidiary of the Registrant and Dale Israel Electronic Industries Ltd., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology (Be’er Sheva, Israel)
  
10.10 †††   Form of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program
 
10.11 †††††   Form of Warrant Agreement
     
10.12 ††   Form of Note Instrument
     
10.13 ††   Form of Put and Call Agreement
     
10.14 * ††   Form of Supply Agreement between Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Supplier and Vishay Advanced Technology, Ltd., a subsidiary of the Registrant as Buyer
     
10.15 * ††   Form of Supply Agreement between Vishay Measurements Group, Inc., a subsidiary of the Registrant as Supplier and Vishay S.A., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Buyer
     
10.16 *   Form of Manufacturing Agreement between Vishay S.A., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Manufacturer and Vishay Precision Foil GmbH, an indirect subsidiary of the Registrant as Buyer
     
10.17 †††   Form of Intellectual Property License Agreement between Vishay S.A., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Licensee and Vishay Advanced Technology, Ltd., a subsidiary of the Registrant as Licensor
 
5
 


     
10.18 *   Form of Supply Agreement between Vishay Precision Foil GmbH, an indirect subsidiary of the Registrant as Supplier and Vishay S.A., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Buyer
     
10.19 †††   Form of Intellectual Property License Agreement between Vishay S.A., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Licensee and the Registrant as Licensor
     
10.21 †††   Form of Lease Agreement between Vishay Alpha Electronics Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of the Registrant as Lessor, and Vishay Japan Co., Ltd., an indirect subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology as Lessee (Akita, Japan)
     
10.22 †††   Form of Lease Agreement between Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. and the Registrant (Malvern, PA USA)
     
10.23 †††   Form of Lease Agreement between Vishay Precision Israel, Ltd., a subsidiary of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. as Lessor and Vishay Israel, Ltd., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., as Lessee.
     
10.24   Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. filed June 25, 2008)
     
10.25   First Amendment to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. filed December 16, 2008)
     
10.26   Second Amendment to Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. filed July 31, 2009)
     
10.27 ††††   Term sheet, dated June 14, 2010, by and among Ziv Shoshani and the Registrant
     
10.28 ††††   Term sheet, dated June 14, 2010, by and among William Clancy and the Registrant
     
10.29 ††††   Term sheet, dated June 14, 2010, by and among Tom Kieffer and the Registrant
     
21.   Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 
99.1   Preliminary Information Statement, dated as of June 22, 2010
____________________
 
     Previously filed on March 26, 2010.
††   Previously filed on May 6, 2010.
†††   Previously filed on June 2, 2010.
††††   Previously filed on June 15, 2010.
†††††   Previously filed on June 18, 2010.
*   Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this Exhibit.  Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
6
 


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form 10 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Malvern, Pennsylvania, on June 22, 2010.
 
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
 
 
By:  /s/ Ziv Shoshani  
 
Ziv Shoshani
President
Chief Executive Officer
principal executive officer
 
 
By: /s/ William M. Clancy  
 
William M. Clancy
Chief Financial Officer
Corporate Secretary
principal financial officer

7
 


June 22, 2010
 
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
63 Lancaster Avenue
Malvern, PA 19355-2143
 
Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
      We have acted as your United States federal income tax counsel in connection with the distribution (“Distribution”) by Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Vishay”), to the holders of Vishay’s common stock (“Vishay Common Stock”) and Vishay’s Class B common stock (“Vishay Class B Common Stock”) of all of the outstanding shares of common stock (“VPG Common Stock”) and Class B common stock (“VPG Class B Common Stock”) of Vishay Precision Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Vishay (“VPG”), pursuant to that Master Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated June 22, 2010 (the “MSDA”) by and between Vishay and VPG. In connection with our engagement, you have requested our opinions (the “Opinions”) regarding certain United States federal income tax consequences of the Distribution.
 
      Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the MSDA and the exhibits and schedules attached thereto or in the Tax Certificate (defined below). Unless otherwise indicated, all “section” or “§” references herein are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and currently in effect (the “Code”), and references to “Treas. Reg. §” are to the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.
 
      For the purpose of rendering the Opinions, we have examined and are relying, with your permission (without any independent investigation or review thereof other than such investigation and review as we have deemed necessary to comply with our professional obligations under Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Circular 230 or otherwise), upon the truth and accuracy, at all relevant times, of the statements, covenants, representations and warranties contained in the following documents (the “Documents”):
 
      1. The MSDA and the Forms of Ancillary Agreements;
 
      2. Vishay’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on June 22, 2010 (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to VPG Common Stock and VPG Class B Common Stock (collectively “VPG Stock”) to be issued to the stockholders of Vishay in connection with the Distribution;
 
      3. The private letter ruling from the IRS delivered to Vishay dated June 11, 2010 (the “PLR”);
 
      4. The Tax Certificate delivered to us by Vishay dated the date hereof (the “Tax Certificate”) which assumes that it will be true and accurate as of the date of the Distribution; and
 


Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
Page 2
June 22, 2010
 
      5. Such other instruments and documents related to the Distribution as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of the Opinions.
 
      For purposes of the Opinions, we have assumed, with your permission and without independent investigation or verification (other than such investigation and verification as we have deemed necessary to comply with our professional obligations under IRS Circular 230 or otherwise), (i) that the transactions contemplated by the MSDA and the other Documents will be consummated in the manner contemplated therein and in the Registration Statement without the waiver of conditions to any party’s obligations to effect such transactions that could adversely affect the Opinions, (ii) that original documents (including signatures) are authentic, (iii) that documents submitted to us as copies conform to the original documents, (iv) that there has been and will be due execution and delivery of all documents where due execution and delivery are prerequisites to the effectiveness of those documents, (v) the accuracy of statements and representations contained in the Documents, (vi) that covenants and warranties set forth in the Documents have been and will be complied with and (vii) that the transactions contemplated by the MSDA, the Ancillary Agreements, and any related agreements are effective under applicable law.
 
      Furthermore, we have assumed, with your permission and without independent investigation or verification (other than such investigation and verification as we have deemed necessary to comply with our professional obligations under IRS Circular 230 or otherwise), that, as to all matters in which a person or entity making a representation has represented that such person or entity, or a related party, is not a party to, does not have, or is not aware of, any plan, intention, understanding, agreement, arrangement or negotiations to take action, there is in fact no plan, intention, understanding, agreement or negotiations and such action was not taken on or prior to the Distribution Date, and we have further assumed that any statement made “to the knowledge of” or otherwise similarly qualified is correct without such qualification.
 
      Subject to the foregoing and any other assumptions, limitations and qualifications specified herein, our Opinions are as follows:
 
      1. The Distribution will qualify as a transaction described in § 355(a), and, therefore, no gain or loss will be recognized by (and no amount will otherwise be included in the income of) Vishay’s shareholders on the receipt of VPG Stock; and
 
      2. The Distribution will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of § 368(a)(1)(D) and, therefore, no gain or loss will be recognized by Vishay on the Distribution pursuant to § 361(c).
 


Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
Page 3
June 22, 2010
 
      The Opinions are based upon the Code, the Treasury Regulations thereunder, administrative pronouncements and judicial authority, all as in effect as of the date hereof. They represent our best legal judgment as to the matters addressed herein but are not binding on the IRS or the courts. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the Opinions would not be challenged by the IRS, and, if challenged, would be sustained by a court. Furthermore, the authorities upon which we rely may be changed at any time, potentially with retroactive effect. No assurances can be given as to the effect of any such changes on the conclusions expressed in the Opinions. We undertake no responsibility to advise you of any new developments in the application or interpretation of relevant tax laws. If any of the facts or assumptions pertinent to the United States federal income tax treatment of the transactions addressed herein or any of the statements, covenants, representations or warranties contained in the Documents are, or later become, inaccurate, such inaccuracy may adversely affect the conclusions expressed in the Opinions. In addition, the Opinions are limited to the tax matters specifically covered hereby, and we have not been asked to address, nor have we addressed, any other tax consequences of the transactions addressed herein or any other transaction.
 
Very truly yours,
 
 
/s/ PEPPER HAMILTON LLP



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MASTER SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
 
 
between
 
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
 
and
 
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
      Page
ARTICLE I       DEFINITIONS 2
 
ARTICLE II   BUSINESS SEPARATION 14
       Section 2.1   Separation 14
       Section 2.2   [Intentionally omitted] 14
       Section 2.3   Transfer of Separated Assets; Assumption of Assumed Liabilities 15
       Section 2.4   Separated Assets 15
       Section 2.5   Liabilities 17
       Section 2.6   Excluded Assumed Liabilities 18
       Section 2.7   Deferred Separation Transactions 19
       Section 2.8   Consents and Governmental Approvals 19
       Section 2.9   Novation of the Assumed Liabilities 20
       Section 2.10   Documents Relating to Transfers of the Separated Assets and
Assumption of the Assumed Liabilities 21
       Section 2.11   Termination of Agreements 22
       Section 2.12   Release of Security Interest 22
       Section 2.13   No Representation or Warranty 22
       Section 2.14   Use of Cash 23
       Section 2.15   Plan of Reorganization 23
       Section 2.16   Assets Transferred to Vishay 23
       Section 2.17   Net Cash 23
 
ARTICLE III   THE DISTRIBUTION AND ACTIONS PENDING THE DISTRIBUTION 24
       Section 3.1   Transactions Prior to the Distribution 24
       Section 3.2   Conditions Precedent to Consummation of the Distribution 25
       Section 3.3   Documents to be Delivered by Vishay 27
       Section 3.4   Documents to be Delivered by VPG 27
       Section 3.5   Distribution 28
 
ARTICLE IV   ADDITIONAL COVENANTS, FURTHER ASSURANCES AND
OTHER MATTERS 30
       Section 4.1   Provision of Corporate Records 30
       Section 4.2   Further Assurance 30
       Section 4.3   Agreement For Exchange Of Information 31
       Section 4.4   Production of Witnesses; Records; Cooperation 33
       Section 4.5   Confidentiality 33
       Section 4.6   Privileged Matters 34
       Section 4.7   Cooperation with Respect to Know-how 36
       Section 4.8   VPG Exchangeable Notes and VPG Warrants 36
       Section 4.9   Tax Matters 37
       Section 4.10   Employee Matters 37
       Section 4.11   Intellectual Property 37

- i -
 


       Section 4.12       Services Support       37
       Section 4.13   Real Property 37
 
ARTICLE V   SURVIVAL AND INDEMNIFICATION 38
       Section 5.1   Mutual Release 38
       Section 5.2   Indemnification by Vishay 39
       Section 5.3   Indemnification by VPG 40
       Section 5.4   Tax Indemnification 40
       Section 5.5   Indemnification Obligations Net of Insurance Proceeds and Other Amounts 41
       Section 5.6   Procedures for Indemnification of Third Party Claims 41
       Section 5.7   Procedures for Indemnification of Direct Claims 43
       Section 5.8   Payments 43
       Section 5.9   Contribution 44
       Section 5.10   Remedies Cumulative 44
       Section 5.11   Survival of Indemnities 44
 
ARTICLE VI   CONTINGENT GAINS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES 44
       Section 6.1   Contingent Gains 44
       Section 6.2   Exclusive Contingent Liabilities 45
       Section 6.3   Shared Contingent Liabilities 45
       Section 6.4   Payments 46
       Section 6.5   Procedures to Determine Status of Contingent Liability or Contingent Gain 46
       Section 6.6   Certain Case Allocation Matters 47
 
ARTICLE VII   INSURANCE 47
       Section 7.1   Insurance Matters Generally 47
       Section 7.2   Shared Insurance Policies 47
       Section 7.3   Insurance for VPG Officers & Directors 49
       Section 7.4   Director and Officer Indemnification 49
       Section 7.5   VPG Insurance 49
 
ARTICLE VIII   DISPUTE RESOLUTION 49
       Section 8.1   Agreement to Resolve Disputes 49
       Section 8.2   Dispute Resolution; Mediation 50
       Section 8.3   Arbitration 51
       Section 8.4   Continuity of Service and Performance 51
       Section 8.5   Limitation of Liability 52
 
ARTICLE IX   Termination 52
 
ARTICLE X   MISCELLANEOUS 52
       Section 10.1   Counterparts 52
       Section 10.2   Entire Agreement 52
       Section 10.3   Construction 53
       Section 10.4   Assignability 54

- ii -
 


       Section 10.5       Third Party Beneficiaries       54
       Section 10.6   Governing Law 54
       Section 10.7   Notices 54
       Section 10.8   Severability 55
       Section 10.9   Nonrecurring Costs and Expenses 55
       Section 10.10   Press Releases; Public Announcements 56
       Section 10.11   Survival of Covenants 56
       Section 10.12   Waiver of Default 56
       Section 10.13   Amendments 56
       Section 10.14   Specific Performance 57
       Section 10.15   Consent to Jurisdiction 57
       Section 10.16   Waiver of jury trial 57

Annex A       VPG Group Balance Sheet
 
SCHEDULES
Schedule 1.1   Capital Allocation Transactions
Schedule 1.2   Exclusive VPG Contingent Liabilities
Schedule 1.3   Separation Transactions
Schedule 1.4   Shared Contingent Liabilities
Schedule 2.4(a)(iii)   Subsidiaries of VPG
Schedule 2.4(b)(i)   Excluded Assets
Schedule 2.5(b)(ii)   Excluded Assumed Liabilities
Schedule 2.5(b)(v)   Excluded Assumed Environmental Liabilities
Schedule 2.16   Assets Being Transferred to Members of Vishay Group
Schedule 3.3(b)   Director and Officer Resignations by Members of Vishay Group
Schedule 3.4(b)   Director and Officer Resignations by Members of VPG Group
 
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A Employee Matters Agreement
Exhibit B IP License Agreement
Exhibit C Lease Agreements
Exhibit D Patent License Agreement
Exhibit E RCK IP License Agreement
Exhibit F RCK Manufacturing Agreement
Exhibit G RCK Supply Agreement
Exhibit H Secondment Agreement
Exhibit I Supply Agreement
Exhibit J Tax Matters Agreement
Exhibit K Trademark License Agreement
Exhibit L Transition Services Agreement

- iii -
 


MASTER SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
 
      This Master Separation and Distribution Agreement (this “ Agreement ”) is entered into as of June 22, 2010, by and between Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (“ Vishay ”), and Vishay Precision Group, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (“ VPG ”).
 
RECITALS
 
      WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Vishay (the “ Vishay Board ”) has determined it is appropriate and desirable to separate Vishay and VPG into two publicly-traded companies by separating from Vishay and transferring to VPG Vishay’s MGF Business (as defined below), and related assets and liabilities, in a series of transactions on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
      WHEREAS, the Vishay Board has determined that it would be advisable and in the best interests of Vishay and its stockholders for Vishay to distribute, on a pro rata basis, (i) to the holders as of the Record Date (as defined below) of the issued and outstanding shares of Vishay’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “ Vishay common stock ”), all of the issued and outstanding shares of VPG’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “ VPG common stock ”), owned by Vishay as of the Distribution Date (as defined below) and (ii) to the holders as of the Record Date of the issued and outstanding shares of Vishay’s Class B common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “ Vishay Class B common stock ”, together with the Vishay common stock, the “ Vishay Stock ”), all of the issued and outstanding shares of VPG’s Class B common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “ VPG Class B common stock ”, together with VPG common stock, the “ VPG Stock ”), owned by Vishay as of the Distribution Date, in each case, as further described herein (collectively, the “ Distribution ”);
 
      WHEREAS, Vishay and VPG intend that the Separation (as defined below) and the Distribution will qualify for United States federal income tax purposes as transactions that are generally tax free under, among other provisions, Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “ Code ”) and hereby adopt this Agreement as a “ plan of reorganization ”; and
 
      WHEREAS, the parties intend in this Agreement to set forth the principal arrangements between them regarding the Separation and the Distribution and certain other agreements that will govern the relationship of Vishay and VPG following the Distribution.
 
      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, agreements, representations and warranties contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree, intending to be legally bound, as follows:
 


ARTICLE I
 
DEFINITIONS
 
      Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in this Article I .
 
      AAA ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.3(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Action ” means any claim, demand, action, suit, counter suit, arbitration, inquiry, proceeding or investigation by or before any Governmental Authority and shall include any negotiations in settlement of or in lieu of an Action.
 
      Actual VPG Net Cash ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.17(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Affiliate ” means, as applied to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with that Person as of the date on which or at any time during the period for when such determination is being made. For purposes of this definition, “ control ” means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities or other interests, by contract or otherwise, and the terms “ controlling ” and “ controlled ” have meanings correlative to the foregoing.
 
      Agent ” means the distribution agent to be appointed by Vishay to distribute to the stockholders of Vishay pursuant to the Distribution all of the shares of VPG Stock.
 
      Agreement ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Ancillary Agreements ” means the (i) Tax Matters Agreement, (ii) Transition Services Agreement, (iii) Employee Matters Agreement, (iv) License Agreements, (v) Lease Agreements, (vi) RCK Agreements, (vii) Supply Agreements, and (viii) Secondment Agreement, and, in the singular, means any one of them.
 
      Applicable Law ” means any applicable law, statute, rule or regulation of any Governmental Authority, or any outstanding order, judgment, injunction, ruling or decree by any Governmental Authority.
 
      Assets ” means assets, properties and rights (including goodwill), wherever located (including in the possession of vendors or other third parties or elsewhere), whether real, personal or mixed, tangible, intangible or contingent, in each case whether or not recorded or reflected or required to be recorded or reflected on the books and records or financial statements of any Person, including the following:
 
      (i) all accounting and other books, records and files whether in paper, microfilm, microfiche, computer tape or disc, magnetic tape or any other form;
 
- 2 -
 


      (ii) all computers and other electronic data processing equipment, fixtures, machinery, equipment, furniture, office equipment, motor vehicles and other transportation equipment, special and general tools, prototypes and models and other tangible personal property, wherever located that are owned or leased by the Person, together with any express or implied warranty by the manufacturers, sellers or lessors of any item or component part thereof;
 
      (iii) all inventories, wherever located, including all finished goods, (whether or not held at a location or facility or in transit), work in process, raw materials, spare parts and all other materials and supplies to be used or consumed in the production of finished goods;
 
      (iv) all interests in real property of whatever nature, including any Encumbrances thereto, whether as owner, mortgagee or holder of a Security Interest in real property, lessor, sublessor, lessee, sublessee or otherwise;
 
      (v) all interests in any capital stock or other equity interests of any Subsidiary or any other Person; all bonds, notes, debentures or other securities issued by any Subsidiary or any other Person; all loans, advances or other extensions of credit or capital contributions to any Subsidiary or any other Person; and all other investments in securities of any Person;
 
      (vi) all license agreements, leases of personal property, open purchase orders for raw materials, supplies, parts or services, unfilled orders for the manufacture and sale of products and other contracts, agreements or commitments;
 
      (vii) all deposits and prepaid expenses, letters of credit and performance and surety bonds, claims for refunds and rights of set-off in respect thereof;
 
      (viii) all written technical Information, data, specifications, research and development Information, engineering drawings, operating and maintenance manuals, and materials and analyses whether prepared by Affiliates, by consultants or other third parties;
 
      (ix) all Intellectual Property and licenses from third Persons granting the right to use any Intellectual Property;
 
      (x) all computer applications, programs and other software (whether in source code, object code or other form), including operating software, network software, firmware, middleware, design software, design tools, compilations and data, technology supporting the foregoing, systems documentation, and user and training materials and instructions related to any of the foregoing;
 
      (xi) all cost Information, sales and pricing data, customer prospect lists, supplier records, customer and supplier lists, customer and vendor data, correspondence and lists, product literature, artwork, design, development and manufacturing files, vendor and customer drawings, formulations and specifications, quality records and reports and other books, records, studies, surveys, reports, plans and documents;
 
      (xii) all trade accounts and notes receivable and other rights to payment from customers and all security for such accounts or rights to payment, including all trade accounts receivable representing amounts receivable in respect of goods shipped or products sold or otherwise disposed of or services rendered to customers, (b) all other accounts and notes receivable and all security for such accounts or notes, and (c) any claim, remedy or other right relating to any of the foregoing;
 
- 3 -
 


      (xiii) all rights under Contracts, all claims or rights against any Person arising from the ownership of any Asset, all rights in connection with any bids or offers and all claims, choses in action or similar rights, whether accrued or contingent;
 
      (xiv) all rights under insurance policies and all rights in the nature of insurance, indemnification or contribution, including Insurance Proceeds;
 
      (xv) all licenses, permits, approvals and authorizations which have been issued by any Governmental Authority; and
 
      (xvi) cash or cash equivalents, bank accounts, lock boxes and other deposit arrangements.
 
      Assumed Liabilities ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.5(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Auditor ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.17(b) of this Agreement.
 
      Business ” means the Vishay Business or the MGF Business, as the context requires.
 
      Business Day ” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which commercial banks are authorized or required to close in New York, New York or in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 
      Capital Allocation Transactions ” means the repayment of outstanding indebtedness owed by one or more members of the VPG Group to one or more members of the Vishay Group or by one or more members of the Vishay Group to one or more members of the VPG Group or any dividend or other distributions by one or more members of the VPG Group to one or more members of the Vishay Group or a capital contribution by one or more members of the Vishay Group to one or more members of the VPG Group, as described in Schedule 1.1 , and in the singular means any one such transaction. The Capital Allocation Transactions are intended to proceed in accordance with and pursuant to the steps set forth in the request for a private letter ruling submitted by Vishay to the IRS on December 23, 2009, as amended from time to time.
 
      Class B Common Stock Distribution Ratio ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(c)(iii) of this Agreement.
 
      Code ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      Commission ” means the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
      Common Stock Distribution Ratio ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(c)(iii) of this Agreement.
 
- 4 -
 


      Confidential Information ” means all proprietary, design or operational Information, data or material including, without limitation: (a) specifications, ideas and concepts for goods and services; (b) manufacturing specifications and procedures; (c) design drawings and models; (d) materials and material specifications; (e) quality assurance policies, procedures and specifications; (f) customer, client, manufacturer and supplier Information; (g) computer software and derivatives thereof relating to design development or manufacture of goods; (h) training materials and Information; (i) inventions, devices, new developments, methods and processes, whether patentable or unpatentable and whether or not reduced to practice; (j) all other know-how, methodology, procedures, techniques and Trade Secrets; (k) proprietary earnings reports and forecasts; (l) proprietary macro-economic reports and forecasts; (m) proprietary marketing, advertising and business plans, objectives and strategies; (n) proprietary general market evaluations and surveys; (o) proprietary financing and credit-related Information; (p) other copyrightable or patented works; and (q) all similar and related Information in whatever form; in each case, of one party which, prior to or following the Distribution Date, has been disclosed by Vishay or members of its Group on the one hand, or VPG or members of its Group, on the other hand, in written, oral (including by recording), electronic, or visual form to, or otherwise has come into the possession of, the other Group, including pursuant to the access provisions of Section 4.3 hereof or any other provision of this Agreement.
 
      Consents ” means any consents, waivers or approvals, or notification requirements.
 
      Contingent Claim Committee ” means a committee composed of one representative designated from time to time by each of Vishay and VPG that shall be established in accordance with Section 6.5 .
 
      Contingent Gain ” means any claim or right of any member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group, whenever arising, against any Person, other than a Person released or intended to be released from a claim or other right under Article V ; provided , that (i) such claim or right has accrued as of the Distribution Date, and (ii) the existence or scope of the claim or right against such other Person was not acknowledged, fixed or determined in any material respect as of the Distribution Date as a result of a dispute or as a result of any other uncertainty due to the failure of such claim or right to have been discovered or asserted as of the Distribution Date. For purposes of the foregoing, a claim or right shall be deemed to have accrued as of the Distribution Date if all the elements of the claim necessary for its assertion shall have occurred on or prior to the Distribution Date such that the claim or right, were it to have been asserted in an Action on or prior to the Distribution Date, would not be dismissed by a court on ripeness or similar grounds, regardless of whether there was any Action pending, threatened or contemplated as of the Distribution Date with respect thereto.
 
      Contingent Liability ” means any Liability of a member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group, whenever arising, against any Person unless that Person has been released or the Liability to that Person is intended to be released under Article V ; provided , that (i) such Liability has accrued as of the Distribution Date and (ii) the existence or scope of such Liability was not acknowledged, fixed or determined in any material respect as of the Distribution Date as a result of a dispute or as a result of any other uncertainty due to the failure of such Liability to have been discovered or asserted as of the Distribution Date. For purposes of the foregoing, a Liability shall be deemed to have accrued as of the Distribution Date if all the elements necessary for the assertion of a claim with respect to such Liability shall have occurred on or prior to the Distribution Date such that the claim, were it to have been asserted in an Action on or prior to the Distribution Date, would not be dismissed by a court on ripeness or similar grounds.
 
- 5 -
 


      Contract ” means any contract, agreement, lease, purchase and/or commitment, license, consensual obligation, promise or undertaking (whether written or oral and whether express or implied) that is legally binding on any Person or any part of its property under Applicable Law, including all claims or rights against any Person, choses in action and similar rights, whether accrued or contingent with respect to any such contract, agreement, lease, purchase and/or commitment, license, consensual obligation, promise or undertaking, but excluding this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement, save as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or in any Ancillary Agreement.
 
      Determination Date ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.17(b) of this Agreement.
 
      Determination Request ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.5(b) of this Agreement.
 
      Distribution ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      Distribution Date ” means the date determined by the Vishay Board as the date on which the Distribution shall be effected.
 
      Dispute ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Dispute Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Effective Time ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(b) of this Agreement.
 
      Employee Matters Agreement ” means the Employee Matters Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A . From and after the Distribution Date, the Employee Matters Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Encumbrance ” means, with respect to any Asset, mortgages, liens, hypothecations, pledges, security interests, easements, encroachments, rights to acquire, use restrictions, transfer restrictions or other encumbrances of any kind in respect of such Asset, whether or not filed, recorded or otherwise perfected under Applicable Law.
 
      Environmental Law ” means any federal, state, local, or foreign law, regulation, order, judgment, decree, permit, authorization, common law or agency requirement whether now existing or hereafter enacted or promulgated relating to: (A) the protection, investigation, or restoration of the environment, health, safety or natural resources; (B) the handling, use, presence, disposal, release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance; or (C) noise, odor, indoor air, employee exposure, wetlands, pollution, contamination or any injury or threat of injury to persons or property relating to any Hazardous Substance; including but not limited to the Comprehensive Environmental, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 as amended, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Air Act as amended, the Toxic Substances Control Act as amended, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and comparable local, state and foreign statutes. As used herein, “Hazardous Substance” means any substance that is: (A) listed, classified or regulated pursuant to any Environmental Law; (B) any petroleum product or by-product, asbestos-containing material, lead-containing paint or plumbing, polychlorinated biphenyl, radioactive material or radon; and (C) any other substance which is subject to regulatory Action by any Governmental Authority in connection with any Environmental Law.
 
- 6 -
 


      Environmental Liabilities ” means all Liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from any Environmental Law or Contract relating to environmental, health or safety matters (including all removal, remediation or cleanup costs, investigatory costs, governmental response costs, natural resources damages, property damages, personal injury damages, costs of compliance with any product take back requirements or with any settlement, judgment or other determination of Liability and indemnity, contribution or similar obligations) and all costs and expenses, interest, fines, penalties or other monetary sanctions in connection therewith.
 
      Exchange Act ” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
 
      Excluded Assets ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(b) of this Agreement.
 
      Excluded Assumed Liabilities ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.5(b) of this Agreement.
 
      Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain ” means any Contingent Gain other than an Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain or a Shared Contingent Gain.
 
      Exclusive Vishay Contingent Liability ” means any Contingent Liability other than an Exclusive VPG Contingent Liability or a Shared Contingent Liability.
 
      Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain ” means any Contingent Gain if such Contingent Gain relates exclusively to the MGF Business or if such Contingent Gain is expressly assigned to any member of the VPG Group pursuant to this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement. As of the date of this Agreement, the parties are not aware of the existence of any Exclusive VPG Contingent Gains.
 
      Exclusive VPG Contingent Liability ” means any Contingent Liability if such Contingent Liability relates exclusively to the MGF Business, including the matters listed or described on Schedule 1.2 hereto, or if such Contingent Liability is expressly assigned to any member of the VPG Group pursuant to this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement. For the sake of clarity, the Contingent Liabilities described on Schedule 1.4 shall be allocated as set forth on that schedule.
 
      final determination ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.8 of this Agreement.
 
      Form 10 Registration Statement ” means the registration statement on Form 10 (including any and all exhibits filed thereto) to be filed under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which the shares of VPG Stock to be issued in VPG Distribution will be registered, together with all amendments thereto.
 
- 7 -
 


      GAAP ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(a)(v) of this Agreement.
 
      Governmental Approvals ” means any notices, reports or other filings to be made, or any Consents, registrations, approvals, permits or authorizations to be obtained from, any Governmental Authority.
 
      Governmental Authority ” means any U.S. or non-U.S. federal, state, local, foreign or international court, arbitration or mediation tribunal, government, department, commission, board, bureau, agency, official or other regulatory, administrative or governmental authority.
 
      Group ” means the Vishay Group or the VPG Group, as the context requires.
 
      Indemnified Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.5(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Indemnifying Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.5(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Indemnity Payment ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.5(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Information ” means information, whether or not patentable or copyrightable, in written, oral, electronic or other tangible or intangible forms, stored in any medium, including studies, reports, records, books, contracts, instruments, surveys, discoveries, ideas, concepts, know-how, techniques, designs, specifications, drawings, blueprints, diagrams, models, prototypes, samples, flow charts, data, computer data, disks, diskettes, tapes, computer programs or other software, marketing plans, customer names, communications by or to attorneys (including attorney-client privileged communications), memos and other materials prepared by attorneys or under their direction (including attorney work product), and other technical, financial, employee or business information or data, but in any case excluding back-up tapes.
 
      Information Statement ” means the information statement forming a part of the Form 10 Registration Statement.
 
      Insurance Policy ” means any insurance policies and insurance Contracts, including without limitation general liability, property and casualty, workers’ compensation, automobile, marine, directors & officers liability, errors and omissions, employee dishonesty and fiduciary liability policies and contracts, but excluding life and other benefits policies or Contracts, whether in the nature of primary, excess, umbrella or self-insurance overage, together with all rights, benefits and privileges thereunder.
 
      Insurance Proceeds ” means those monies (in each case net of any costs or expenses incurred in the collection thereof and net of any applicable premium adjustments (including reserves and retrospectively rated premium adjustments)): (a) received by an insured from an insurance carrier; or (b) paid by an insurance carrier on behalf of the insured, net of any applicable premium deductible or self insured retention.
 
- 8 -
 


      Intellectual Property ” means all domestic and foreign patents and patent applications, together with any continuations, continuations-in-part or divisional applications thereof, and all patents issuing thereon (including reissues, renewals and re-examinations of the foregoing); design patents; invention disclosures; mask works; all domestic and foreign copyrights, whether or not registered, together with all copyright applications and registrations therefor; all domain names, together with any registrations therefor and any goodwill relating thereto; all domestic and foreign trademarks, service marks, trade names, and trade dress, in each case together with any applications and registrations therefor and all goodwill relating thereto; all Trade Secrets, commercial and technical Information, know-how, proprietary or Confidential Information, including engineering, production and other designs, notebooks, processes, drawings, specifications, formulae, and technology; computer and electronic data processing programs and software (object and source code), data bases and documentation thereof; all inventions (whether or not patented); all utility models; all registered designs, certificates of invention and all other intellectual property under the laws of any country throughout the world.
 
      IP License Agreement ” means the IP License Agreement, between VPG, as licensor, and Vishay or a Subsidiary of Vishay, as licensee, for the license of certain Intellectual Property relating to the manufacture of strain gages, substantially in the form of Exhibit B . From and after the Distribution Date, the IP License Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      IRS ” means the Internal Revenue Service.
 
      Lease Agreements ” means the real property lease agreements between one or more members of the Vishay Group, on the one hand, and one or more members of the VPG Group on the other hand, listed on Exhibit C , substantially in the forms attached to such Exhibit. From and after the Distribution Date, the Lease Agreements shall refer to the real property lease agreements substantially in the form attached to Exhibit C , each as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Liability ” means, with respect to any Person, any and all losses, claims, charges, debts, demands, Actions, causes of action, suits, damages, obligations, payments, costs and expenses, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, specialties, indemnities and similar obligations, exoneration covenants, obligations under Contracts, guarantees, make whole agreements and similar obligations, and other liabilities and requirements, including all contractual obligations, whether absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, known or unknown, joint or several, whenever arising, and including those arising under any Applicable Law, Action, threatened or contemplated Action (including the costs and expenses of demands, assessments, judgments, settlements and compromises relating thereto and attorneys’ fees and any and all costs and expenses, whatsoever reasonably incurred in investigating, preparing or defending against any such Actions or threatened or contemplated Actions) or order of any Governmental Authority or any award of any arbitrator or mediator of any kind, and those arising under any Contract, in each case, whether or not recorded or reflected or otherwise disclosed or required to be recorded or reflected or otherwise disclosed, on the books and records or financial statements of any Person, including any Liability for Taxes.
 
      License Agreements ” mean the Trademark License Agreement, the Patent License Agreement, the IP License Agreement and the RCK IP License Agreement.
 
- 9 -
 


      MGF Business ” means the measurements and foil resistor business owned and operated, indirectly or directly, by Vishay prior to the Distribution, to be owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by VPG after the Distribution.
 
      NYSE ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(e) of this Agreement.
 
      Party ,” whether or not capitalized, means Vishay or VPG.
 
      Patent License Agreement ” means the Patent License Agreement, between Vishay or a Subsidiary of Vishay, as licensor, and VPG, as licensee, substantially in the form of Exhibit D . From and after the Distribution Date, the Patent License Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Person ” (whether or not initially capitalized) means any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, firm, joint venture, entity, natural person, trust, estate, unincorporated organization, association, enterprise, government or political subdivision thereof, or Governmental Authority.
 
      Privilege ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Privileged Information ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(a) of this Agreement.
 
      RCK Agreements ” means the RCK IP License Agreement, RCK Manufacturing Agreement and the RCK Supply Agreement.
 
      RCK IP License Agreement ” means the IP License Agreement, between VPG or a Subsidiary of VPG, as licensor, and Vishay or a Subsidiary of Vishay, as licensee, for the license of certain Intellectual Property relating to the manufacture of RCK HR foil resistor products, substantially in the form of in the form of Exhibit E . From and after the Distribution Date, the RCK IP License Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      RCK Manufacturing Agreement ” means the Manufacturing Agreement, between VPG or a Subsidiary of VPG, as buyer, and Vishay or a Subsidiary of Vishay, as manufacturer, relating to the manufacture of specified RCK HR foil resistor products, substantially in the form of Exhibit F . From and after the Distribution Date, the RCK Manufacturing Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      RCK Supply Agreement ” means the Supply Agreement, between VPG or a Subsidiary of VPG, as supplier, and Vishay or a Subsidiary of Vishay, as buyer, relating to the sale and manufacture of specified RCK foil resistor chips, substantially in the form of Exhibit G . From and after the Distribution Date, the RCK Supply Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
- 10 -
 


      Record Date ” means the close of business on the date to be determined by Vishay’s Board in its sole and absolute discretion as the record date for determining the stockholders of Vishay entitled to receive shares of VPG Stock in the Distribution.
 
      Record Holder ” mean a holder of record of Vishay Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.
 
      Registrar and Transfer Agent ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(c)(i) of this Agreement.
 
      Response ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Secondment Agreement ” means the secondment agreement between one or more members of the Vishay Group, as the seconding party, on the one hand, and one or more members of the VPG Group on the other hand, listed on Exhibit H , substantially in the form attached to such Exhibit. From and after the Distribution Date, the Secondment Agreement shall refer to the secondment agreement substantially in the form attached to Exhibit H , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Senior Party Representative ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Separated Assets ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Separation ” means the multi-step process described in Article II , including the Separation Transactions and the Capital Allocation Transactions, by which the MGF Business shall be transferred, directly or indirectly, from Vishay and members of the Vishay Group to VPG and members of the VPG Group.
 
      Separation Transactions ” means the transfers of assets, shares and other equity interests to be performed by Vishay, VPG and members of each respective Group prior to the Distribution, in the manner referred to in Schedule 1.3 hereto and, in the singular, means any one such transaction. The Separation Transactions are intended to proceed in accordance with and pursuant to the steps set forth in the request for a private letter ruling submitted by Vishay to the IRS on December 23, 2009, as amended from time to time.
 
      Shared Contingent Gain ” means, without duplication, any Contingent Gain that is not an Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain or an Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain and shared between the Groups.
 
      Shared Contracts ” means Contracts with a third party providing for rights and obligations of both one or more members of the Vishay Group and one or more members of the VPG Group.
 
      Shared Contingent Liability ” means, without duplication, any Contingent Liability that is not an Exclusive Vishay Contingent Liability or an Exclusive VPG Contingent Liability and shared between the Groups, which Shared Contingent Liabilities shall be allocated as set forth in this Agreement and described on Schedule 1.4 .
 
- 11 -
 


      Shared VPG Percentage ” means the proportion of the Shared Contingent Gain or the Shared Contingent Liability, as applicable, that relates to the MGF Business, provided that , if such Shared Contingent Gain or Shared Contingent Liability, as the case may be, cannot reasonably be allocated, then the Shared VPG Percentage shall be 10%.
 
      Shared Percentage ” means the Shared Vishay Percentage or the Shared VPG Percentage, as the case may be.
 
      Shared Vishay Percentage ” means the proportion of the Shared Contingent Gain or the Shared Contingent Liability, as applicable, that relates to the Vishay Business; provided that if such Shared Contingent Gain or Shared Contingent Liability, as the case may be, cannot reasonably be allocated, then the Shared VPG Percentage shall be 90%.
 
      Subsidiary ” of any Person means a corporation or other organization whether incorporated or unincorporated of which at least a majority of the securities or interests having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to elect at least a majority of the board of directors or others performing similar functions with respect to such corporation or other organization is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person or by any one or more of its Subsidiaries, or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries; provided , however , that no Person that is not directly or indirectly wholly-owned by any other Person shall be a Subsidiary of such other Person unless such other Person controls, or has the right, power or ability to control, that Person.
 
      Supply Agreements ” means the Supply Agreements, between one or more members of the Vishay Group, on the one hand, and one or more members of the VPG Group, on the other hand, listed on Exhibit I , substantially in the form attached to such Exhibit I . From and after the Distribution Date, the Supply Agreement shall refer to the supply agreement substantially in the form attached to Exhibit I , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Taxes ” has the meaning set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement.
 
      Tax Matters Agreement ” means the Tax Matters Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit J . From and after the Distribution Date, the Tax Matters Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit J , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Third Party Claim ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.6(a) of this Agreement.
 
      Trade Secrets ” means Information, including a formula, program, device, method, technique, process or other Confidential Information that derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other Persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use and is the subject of efforts that are reasonable, under the circumstances, to maintain its secrecy.
 
      Trademark License Agreement ” means the Trademark License Agreement, between Vishay, as licensor, and VPG, as licensee, substantially in the form of Exhibit K . From and after the Distribution Date, the Trademark License Agreement shall refer to the agreement executed and delivered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit K , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
- 12 -
 


      Transition Services Agreement ” means the transition services agreement between one or more members of the Vishay Group, on the one hand, and one or more members of the VPG Group, on the other hand, listed on Exhibit L, substantially in the forms attached to such Exhibit. From and after the Distribution Date, the Transition Services Agreement shall refer to the transition services agreement substantially in the form attached as Exhibit L , as amended and/or modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
 
      Vishay ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Vishay Board ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      Vishay Business ” means, collectively, any and all businesses other than the MGF Business owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by Vishay (including without limitation the strain gage business operated by Vishay S.A.).
 
      Vishay Class B common stock ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      Vishay common stock ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      Vishay Group ” means Vishay and each Subsidiary of Vishay and each other Person that is controlled directly or indirectly by Vishay immediately after the Distribution.
 
      Vishay Indemnified Parties ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3 of this Agreement.
 
      Vishay Stock ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      VPG ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      VPG Class B common stock ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      VPG common stock ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      VPG Contracts ” means the following Contracts to which Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group is a party or by which it or any of its Assets is bound, whether or not in writing, except for any such Contract that is explicitly retained by Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group pursuant to any provision of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement: (i) any Contract entered into in the name of, or expressly on behalf of, the MGF Business; (ii) any Contract that relates exclusively to the MGF Business; (iii) the portion of any Shared Contract to the extent attributable to VPG or the MGF Business; (iv) any Contract that is otherwise expressly contemplated pursuant to this Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements to be assigned to VPG or any member of the VPG Group; (v) any guarantee, indemnity, representation, warranty or other Liability of any member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group in respect of any VPG Contract, any Assumed Liability or the MGF Business (including guarantees of financing incurred by customers or other third parties in connection with purchases of products or services from the MGF Business); and (vi) any other Contract as agreed between the parties.
 
- 13 -
 


      VPG Group ” means VPG, each Subsidiary of VPG and each other Person that is controlled directly or indirectly by VPG immediately after the Distribution.
 
      VPG Group Balance Sheet ” means the unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated balance sheet of the VPG Group at April 3, 2010, substantially in the form attached as Annex A .
 
      VPG Indemnified Parties ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.2 of this Agreement.
 
      VPG Information ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(a) of this Agreement.
 
      VPG Net Cash ” means the amount of (i) all cash and cash equivalents less, without duplication, the sum of (ii) all notes payable to banks, (iii) all other indebtedness owed to third parties and (iv) the principal amount of the exchangeable notes due 2102 of Vishay allocated to VPG, in the case of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of VPG and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, and in each case as recorded in accordance with GAAP.
 
      VPG Net Cash Statement ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.17(a) of this Agreement.
 
      VPG Stock ” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
 
      Wholly-owned Subsidiary ” of a Person means a Subsidiary of that Person substantially all of whose voting securities and outstanding equity interest are owned either directly or indirectly by such Person or one or more of its Subsidiaries or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries.
 
ARTICLE II
 
BUSINESS SEPARATION
 
      Section 2.1 Separation . Prior to the Distribution, each of Vishay and VPG shall, and shall cause the applicable members of its Group to, complete the Separation Transactions and the Capital Allocation Transactions and otherwise take all actions necessary to implement the Separation on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Separation is intended to result in VPG, directly or indirectly, operating the MGF Business, owning the Separated Assets and assuming the Assumed Liabilities as set forth in this Article II . As promptly as practicable after the Separation is complete and subject to the conditions set forth in Section 3.2 , the parties shall take, or cause to be taken, all actions that are necessary or appropriate to effectuate the Distribution.
 
      Section 2.2 [ Intentionally omitted ]
 
- 14 -
 


      Section 2.3 Transfer of Separated Assets; Assumption of Assumed Liabilities . (a) Without limiting the generality of Section 2.1 , on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in furtherance of the Separation, on or prior to the Distribution Date:
 
      (i) Vishay shall, and shall cause its applicable Subsidiaries to, cause the Separated Assets to be contributed, assigned, transferred, conveyed and delivered, directly or indirectly, to VPG and its Subsidiaries, as applicable, and VPG shall, and shall cause its applicable Subsidiaries to, accept from Vishay and its Subsidiaries, all of Vishay’s and its Subsidiaries’ rights, title and interest in and to all of the Separated Assets, which will result in VPG owning, directly or indirectly, the MGF Business.
 
      (ii) VPG shall, and shall cause its applicable Subsidiaries to, accept, assume and agree to faithfully perform, discharge and fulfill all of the Assumed Liabilities in accordance with their respective terms. VPG shall, directly or indirectly, be responsible for all of the Assumed Liabilities, regardless of when or where such Assumed Liabilities arose or arise, or whether the facts on which they are based occurred prior to or subsequent to the Distribution Date, regardless of where or against whom such Assumed Liabilities are asserted or determined or whether asserted or determined prior to the Distribution Date.
 
           (b) It is the intention of parties that the transfer of the Separated Assets and the assumption of the Assumed Liabilities, as aforesaid, shall be accomplished through the Separation Transactions, subject to the provisions of Sections 2.7 , 2.8 , 2.9 and 2.10 .
 
      Section 2.4 Separated Assets . (a) For purposes of this Agreement, “ Separated Assets ” means, without duplication, those Assets used or contemplated to be used or held for use exclusively or primarily in the ownership, operation or conduct of the MGF Business or relating exclusively or primarily to the MGF Business, including the following:
 
      (i) all Assets (including VPG Contracts) expressly identified in this Agreement, in any Ancillary Agreement or in any Schedule hereto or thereto, including those referred to on Schedule 1.3 , as Assets to be transferred to, or retained by, VPG or any other member of the VPG Group;
 
      (ii) any Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain or any Shared VPG Percentage of a Shared Contingent Gain;
 
      (iii) the outstanding capital stock, units or other equity interests held by VPG in its Subsidiaries and listed on Schedule 2.4(a)(iii) and the Assets owned by such Subsidiaries;
 
      (iv) all Assets properly reflected on the VPG Group Balance Sheet, excluding Assets disposed of by Vishay or any other Subsidiary or entity controlled by Vishay subsequent to the date of the VPG Group Balance Sheet;
 
      (v) all Assets that have been written off, expensed or fully depreciated by Vishay or any Subsidiary or entity controlled by Vishay that, had they not been written off, expensed or fully depreciated, would have been reflected on the VPG Group Balance Sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“ GAAP ”);
 
- 15 -
 


      (vi) all Assets acquired by Vishay or any Subsidiary or entity controlled by Vishay after the date of the VPG Group Balance Sheet and that would be reflected on the balance sheet of VPG as of the Distribution Date, if such balance sheet were prepared in accordance with GAAP;
 
      (vii) all Assets transferred to VPG or any member of the VPG Group pursuant to Section 4.2 ; provided , however , that any such transfer shall take effect under Section 4.2 and not under this Section 2.4 ; and
 
      (viii) any and all Assets owned or held immediately prior to the Distribution Date by Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group that are used in the MGF Business. The intention of this clause (viii) is only to rectify any inadvertent omission of transfer or conveyance of any Assets that, had the parties given specific consideration to such Asset as of the date hereof, would have otherwise been classified as a Separated Asset. No Asset shall be deemed to be a Separated Asset solely as a result of this clause (viii) if such Asset is within the category or type of Asset expressly covered by the subject matter of an Ancillary Agreement. In addition, no Asset shall be deemed a Separated Asset solely as a result of this clause (viii) unless a claim with respect thereto is made by VPG or a member of the VPG Group on or prior to the second anniversary of the Distribution Date.
 
      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 2.4 or elsewhere in this Agreement, the Separated Assets shall not in any event include the Excluded Assets referred to in Section 2.4(b)(i) below.
 
           (b) The following Assets shall not form part of the Separated Assets and shall remain the exclusive property of Vishay or the relevant member of the Vishay Group on and after the Separation (the “ Excluded Assets ”):
 
      (i) any Asset expressly identified on Schedule 2.4(b)(i) or Schedule 2.16 ;
 
      (ii) the rights of any member of the Vishay Group under any Shared Contract;
 
      (iii) any Asset transferred to Vishay or to any other relevant member of the Vishay Group pursuant to Section 4.2 ; provided , however , that any such transfers shall take effect under Section 4.2 and not under this Section 2.4 ;
 
      (iv) any Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain or any Shared Vishay Percentage of a Shared Contingent Gain; and
 
      (v) any and all Assets that are expressly contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement (or the Schedules hereto or thereto) as Assets to be retained by Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group.
 
- 16 -
 


      Section 2.5 Liabilities .
 
           (a) For the purposes of this Agreement, “ Assumed Liabilities ” shall mean (without duplication):
 
      (i) any and all Liabilities that are expressly contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement (or the Schedules hereto or thereto) as Liabilities to be assumed by VPG or any member of the VPG Group, and all agreements, obligations and Liabilities of any member of the VPG Group under this Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements;
 
      (ii) subject to the terms of Article VI , all Exclusive VPG Contingent Liabilities and the Shared VPG Percentage of any Shared Contingent Liabilities;
 
      (iii) all Liabilities to the extent relating to, arising out of or resulting from any terminated, divested or discontinued businesses and operations of the MGF Business;
 
      (iv) all Liabilities reflected as liabilities or obligations of VPG or its Subsidiaries in the VPG Group Balance Sheet, subject to any discharge of such Liabilities subsequent to the date of the VPG Group Balance Sheet;
 
      (v) all Environmental Liabilities (other than the Environmental Liabilities under Section 2.5(b)(v) ), whether arising prior to, on or after the Distribution Date, to the extent arising out of or resulting from the use by the MGF Business of any property owned, operated, used or leased in the course of operating the MGF Business at any time or any other property where the MGF Business contracted or arranged for disposal at any time; provided that , notwithstanding such general rule, Environmental Liabilities for the facilities set forth on Schedule 2.5(b)(v) shall be the obligation and Liability of Vishay as specified in such Schedule 2.5(b)(v) . With respect to Environmental Liabilities arising from any facility that was jointly used by VPG and Vishay, except as may otherwise agreed between the parties, if one party was the primary user of that property, that party shall be responsible to administer any Action related thereto, including providing any required defense, and the other party shall cooperate in the administration and defense. Liabilities associated with any such Action shall be shared equally by Vishay and VPG unless there is another allocation methodology that more accurately and reasonably reflects the appropriate allocation of responsibility as between Vishay and VPG (including, for the avoidance of doubt, a reasonable estimation of relative fault or cause of the Liabilities);
 
- 17 -
 


      (vi) all other Liabilities (other than Taxes, which are allocated as set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement and employee-related Liabilities, which are allocated as set forth in the Employee Matters Agreement), in each case to the extent relating to, arising out of or resulting from:
 
           (A) the operation of the MGF Business, as conducted at any time prior to, on or after the Distribution Date (including any Liability relating to, arising out of or resulting from any act or failure to act by any director, officer, employee, agent or representative (whether or not such act or failure to act is or was within such Person’s authority)); or
 
           (B) any Separated Assets;
 
      in any such case whether arising prior to, on or after the Distribution Date; and
 
      (vii) any inadvertent omission of transfer or assumption of Liability that, had the parties given specific consideration to such Liability as of the date hereof, would have otherwise been classified as an Assumed Liability.
 
      Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Assumed Liabilities shall not include the Excluded Assumed Liabilities referred to in Section 2.5(b) below.
 
           (b) For the purposes of this Agreement, “ Excluded Assumed Liabilities ” shall mean:
 
      (i) any and all Liabilities that are expressly contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement (or the Schedules hereto or thereto) as Liabilities to be retained or assumed by Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group, and all agreements and obligations of any member of the Vishay Group under this Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements;
 
      (ii) any Liability which is expressly identified on Schedule 2.5(b)(ii) ;
 
      (iii) any and all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from any Excluded Assets;
 
      (iv) subject to the terms of Article VI , all Exclusive Vishay Contingent Liabilities and the Shared Vishay Percentage of any Shared Contingent Liabilities;
 
      (v) all Environmental Liabilities for the facilities set forth on Schedule 2.5(b)(v) and all Environmental Liabilities that are not Assumed Liabilities under Section 2.5(a)(v) ; and
 
      (vi) any inadvertent transfer, conveyance or assumption of any Liability that, had the parties given specific consideration to such Liability as of the date hereof, would have otherwise been classified as an Excluded Assumed Liability.
 
      Section 2.6 Excluded Assumed Liabilities . Vishay shall, or shall cause, as applicable, its Subsidiaries, to be responsible for the Excluded Assumed Liabilities regardless of when or where such Liabilities arose or arise, regardless of where such Liabilities are asserted or determined or regardless of whether asserted or determined prior to the Distribution Date.
 
- 18 -
 


      Section 2.7 Deferred Separation Transactions .
 
           (a) Misallocated Assets . In the event that at any time or from time to time (whether prior to, on or after the Distribution Date), any member of the Vishay Group or any member of the VPG Group shall receive or otherwise possess any Asset that is allocated to a member of the other Group pursuant to this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or the Separation (including any remittances from account debtors), Vishay shall or shall cause such member of the Vishay Group or VPG shall or shall cause such member of the VPG Group, as the case may be, to promptly transfer, or cause to be transferred, such Asset to the Person so entitled thereto. Prior to any such transfer, the Person receiving or possessing such Asset shall hold such Asset in trust for any such other Person. Each party shall cooperate with the other party and use its commercially reasonable efforts to set up procedures and notifications as are reasonably necessary or advisable to effectuate the transfers contemplated by this Section 2.7 .
 
           (b) Mistaken Assignments and Assumptions . If at anytime there exists (i) Assets that either party discovers were, contrary to the agreements between the parties, by mistake or unintentional omission, transferred to VPG or retained by Vishay or (ii) Liabilities that either party discovers were, contrary to the agreements between the parties, by mistake or unintentional omission, assumed by VPG or not assumed by VPG or retained by the Vishay Group, then the parties shall cooperate in good faith to effect the transfer or retransfer of misallocated Assets, and/or the assumption or reassumption of misallocated Liabilities, to or by the appropriate Person and shall not use the determination that remedial actions need to be taken to alter the original intent of the parties with respect to the Assets to be transferred to or Liabilities to be assumed by VPG or retained by Vishay. Each party shall reimburse the other or make other financial adjustments or other adjustments to remedy any mistakes or omissions relating to any of the Assets transferred hereby or any of the Liabilities assumed or retained hereby.
 
           (c) No Additional Consideration . For the avoidance of doubt, the transfer or assumption of any Assets or Liabilities under this Section 2.7 shall be effected without any additional consideration by either party.
 
      Section 2.8 Consents and Governmental Approvals .
 
           (a) Transfers not Consummated Prior to Separation Date . If the transfer or assignment of any Asset intended to be transferred or assigned hereunder is not consummated prior to or on the Distribution Date, whether as a result of a requisite Consent or Governmental Approval or for any other reason, then the Person retaining such Asset shall thereafter hold such Asset for the use and benefit, insofar as reasonably possible, of the Person entitled thereto until the consummation of the transfer or assignment thereof (or as otherwise determined by Vishay and VPG, as applicable). In addition, the Person retaining such Asset shall take such other actions as may be reasonably requested by the Person to whom such Asset is to be transferred in order to place such Person, insofar as reasonably possible, in the same position as if such Asset had been transferred as contemplated hereby and so that all the benefits and burdens relating to such Asset, including possession, use, risk of loss, potential for gain, and dominion, control and command over such Asset, are to inure from and after the Distribution Date to the Person to whom such Asset is to be transferred. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such Asset shall still be considered a Separated Asset or Excluded Asset, as applicable.
 
- 19 -
 


           (b) Expenses . The Person retaining an Asset due to the deferral of the transfer and assignment of such Asset shall not be obligated, in connection with the foregoing, to expend any money in connection with the maintenance of the Asset or otherwise unless the necessary funds are advanced by the Person to whom such Asset is to be transferred, other than reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, attorneys’ fees and recording or similar fees, all of which shall be promptly reimbursed by the Person to whom such Asset is to be transferred; provided , however , that the Person retaining such Asset shall provide prompt notice to the Person to whom such Asset is to be transferred of the amount of all such expenses and fees.
 
           (c) No Additional Consideration . For the avoidance of doubt, the transfer of any Assets under this Section 2.8 shall be effected without any additional consideration by either party.
 
      Section 2.9 Novation of the Assumed Liabilities .
 
           (a) Reasonable Best Efforts . Each of Vishay and VPG, at the request of the other and with the other’s reasonable best cooperation, shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain, or to cause to be obtained, any agreement, instrument, Consent, substitution or amendment required to novate or assign all rights and obligations under Contracts and other obligations or Liabilities of any nature whatsoever that constitute Assumed Liabilities, or to obtain in writing an unconditional release of all parties to such arrangements other than any member of the VPG Group, so that, in any such case, VPG and the other members of the VPG Group will be solely responsible for such Liabilities or, in the case of Shared Contracts, to novate the rights and obligations under each such Contract such that it is replaced with two separate Contracts, one of which provides for the rights and obligations of a member or members of the Vishay Group and the other of which provides for the rights and obligations of a member or members of the VPG Group; provided , however , that neither the Vishay Group nor the VPG Group shall be obligated to pay any consideration or assume any additional obligation therefor to any third party from whom any such Consent, substitution or amendment is requested. Each of Vishay and VPG, at the request of the other and with the other’s reasonable best cooperation, shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain, or to cause to be obtained, any agreement, instrument, Consent, substitution or amendment required to novate or assign all rights and obligations under Contracts and other obligations or Liabilities of any nature whatsoever that constitute Excluded Assumed Liabilities, or to obtain in writing an unconditional release of all parties to such arrangements other than any member of the Vishay Group, so that, in any such case, Vishay and the other members of the Vishay Group will solely be responsible for such Liabilities or, in the case of Shared Contracts, to novate the rights and obligations under each such Contract such that it is replaced with two separate Contracts, one of which provides for the rights and obligations of a member or members of the Vishay Group and the other which provides for the rights and obligations of a member or members of the VPG Group; provided , however , that neither the Vishay Group nor the VPG Group shall be obligated to pay any consideration or assume any additional obligation therefor to any third party from whom any such Consent, substitution or amendment is requested.
 
- 20 -
 


           (b) Inability to Obtain Novation . If Vishay or VPG is unable to obtain, or to cause to be obtained, any such required agreement, instrument, Consent, release, substitution or amendment with respect to any such Assumed Liability or Excluded Assumed Liability, as applicable, the applicable member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group, as applicable, shall continue to be bound by such Contracts and other obligations and Liabilities and, unless not permitted by Applicable Law or the terms thereof (except to the extent expressly set forth in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement), Vishay, with respect to any Excluded Assumed Liability, and VPG, with respect to any Assumed Liability, shall, as agent or subcontractor for the other or such other Person, as the case may be, pay, perform and discharge fully, or cause to be paid, transferred or discharged all the obligations or other Liabilities of any member of the other’s Group thereunder from and after the Distribution Date or, in the case of a Shared Contract, such obligations or other Liabilities as pertain to the member or members of its own Group. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such Liability shall still be considered an Assumed Liability or Excluded Assumed Liability, as applicable; provided , however , that neither Vishay nor VPG shall (nor shall either permit any member of its respective Group to), amend, renew, change the term of, modify the obligations under, or transfer to a third Person, any such Contract or other obligation or other Liability without the written consent of the other. Each of Vishay and VPG shall each use reasonable best efforts to provide prompt notice to the other of any request they receive from the counterparty to any Contract for any such amendment, renewal, change, modification or transfer. Vishay, with respect to any Assumed Liability and VPG, with respect to any Excluded Assumed Liability, shall, without further consideration, pay and remit, or cause to be paid or remitted, to the other or its appropriate Subsidiary promptly all money, rights and other consideration received by it or any member of its Group in respect of such performance (unless any such consideration is, with respect to consideration received by Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group, an Excluded Asset, or, with respect to consideration received by VPG or any member of the VPG Group, a Separated Asset). If and when any such agreement, instrument, Consent, release, substitution or amendment shall be obtained or such Contract or other obligations and Liabilities shall otherwise become assignable or able to be novated, Vishay, for any Assumed Liability, and VPG, for any Excluded Assumed Liability, shall thereafter assign, or cause to be assigned, all of its rights, obligations and other Liabilities thereunder or any rights or obligations of any member of its respective Group to the other without payment of further consideration and the other shall, without the payment of any further consideration, assume such rights, obligations and Liabilities.
 
      Section 2.10 Documents Relating to Transfers of the Separated Assets and Assumption of the Assumed Liabilities . In furtherance of the Separation and the Distribution, including as contemplated by the Separation Transactions, (i) Vishay shall execute and deliver, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to execute and deliver, such bills of sale, stock powers, certificates of title, assignments of Contracts and other instruments of transfer, conveyance and assignment as and to the extent necessary to evidence the transfer, conveyance and assignment of all of Vishay’s and its Subsidiaries’ right, title and interest in and to the Separated Assets to VPG or its Subsidiaries and (ii) VPG shall execute and deliver, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to execute and deliver, to Vishay and its Subsidiaries such assumptions of Contracts and other instruments of assumption as and to the extent necessary to evidence the valid and effective assumption of the Assumed Liabilities by VPG. All conveyance and assumption documents and instruments used to effectuate the Separation and the Distribution shall be in form mutually satisfactory to Vishay and VPG.
 
- 21 -
 


      Section 2.11 Termination of Agreements .
 
           (a) Except as set forth in Section 2.11(b) , in furtherance of the releases and other provisions of Section 5.1 , VPG and each member of the VPG Group, on the one hand, and Vishay and each member of the Vishay Group, on the other hand, effective as of the Distribution Date, shall terminate, any and all Contracts (including any intercompany accounts payable or accounts receivable accrued as of the Distribution Date that are reflected in the books and records of the parties or otherwise documented in writing in accordance with past practices), whether or not in writing, between or among VPG and/or any member of the VPG Group, on the one hand, and Vishay and/or any member of the Vishay Group, on the other hand, effective as of the Distribution Date. No such terminated Contracts (including any provision thereof which purports to survive termination) shall be of any further force or effect after the Distribution Date. Each party shall, at the reasonable request of any other party, take, or cause to be taken, such other actions as may be necessary to effect the foregoing.
 
           (b) The provisions of Section 2.11(a) shall not apply to any of the following Contracts (or to any of the provisions thereof) in: (i) this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements (and each other agreement or instrument expressly contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to be entered into by any of the parties or any of the members of their respective Groups); (ii) any Contracts to which any Person other than the parties and their respective Affiliates is a party (it being understood that to the extent that the rights and obligations of the parties and the members of their respective Groups under any such Contracts constitute Separated Assets or Assumed Liabilities, they shall be assigned or assumed, as the case may be, pursuant to Section 2.3 ); (iii) any Contracts to which any non-wholly owned Subsidiary of Vishay or VPG, as the case may be, is a party (it being understood that directors’ qualifying shares or similar interests will be disregarded for purposes of determining whether a Subsidiary is wholly owned); (iv) intercompany Contracts or accounts receivable entered into or generated in the ordinary course of business; or (v) any other Contracts that this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement expressly contemplates will survive the Distribution Date.
 
      Section 2.12 Release of Security Interest . Upon VPG’s reasonable request, Vishay shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain from third parties the release of any Security Interest granted by Vishay (or any member of its Group) on any Separated Asset.
 
      Section 2.13 No Representation or Warranty .
 
           (a) No party to this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement, or any other agreement or document contemplated by this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or otherwise, is making any representation as to, warranty of or covenant, express or implied, with respect to: (a) any of the Separated Assets, the MGF Business, the Excluded Assets or the Assumed Liabilities, including any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, or any representation or warranty regarding any Consents or Governmental Approvals required in connection therewith or their transfer, (b) the value or freedom from Encumbrances of, or any other matter concerning, any Separated Asset or Excluded Asset, or regarding the absence of any defense or right of setoff or freedom from counterclaim with respect to any claim or other Separated Asset or Excluded Asset, including any account receivable of either party, or (c) the legal sufficiency of any assignment, document or instrument delivered hereunder to convey title to any Separated Asset or Excluded Asset upon the execution, delivery and filing hereof or thereof.
 
- 22 -
 


           (b) EXCEPT AS MAY EXPRESSLY BE SET FORTH HEREIN OR IN ANY ANCILLARY AGREEMENT, ALL ASSETS TO BE TRANSFERRED AS SET FORTH HEREIN OR IN ANY ANCILLARY AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER AGREEMENT OR DOCUMENT CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY SHALL BE TRANSFERRED “AS IS, WHERE IS” (AND, IN THE CASE OF ANY REAL PROPERTY, BY MEANS OF A QUITCLAIM OR SIMILAR FORM DEED OR CONVEYANCE) AND THE TRANSFEREE SHALL BEAR THE ECONOMIC AND LEGAL RISK THAT ANY CONVEYANCE SHALL PROVE TO BE INSUFFICIENT TO VEST IN THE TRANSFEREE GOOD AND MARKETABLE TITLE, AND CLEAR OF ANY SECURITY INTEREST OR ANY NECESSARY CONSENTS OR GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS ARE NOT OBTAINED OR THAT ANY REQUIREMENTS OF LAWS OR JUDGMENTS ARE NOT COMPLIED WITH.
 
      Section 2.14 Use of Cash . From the date hereof until the Distribution Date, Vishay shall be entitled to use, retain or otherwise dispose of all cash generated by the MGF Business and the Separated Assets in accordance with the ordinary course of operation of Vishay.
 
      Section 2.15 Plan of Reorganization . This Agreement shall constitute a plan of reorganization for purposes of Section 368 of the Code.
 
      Section 2.16 Assets Transferred to Vishay . In connection with the Separation, VPG shall, or shall cause the applicable members of the VPG Group to, cause those assets identified on Schedule 2.16 (which are intended to be Excluded Assets) to be contributed, assigned, transferred, conveyed and delivered, directly or indirectly, to Vishay and one or more members of the Vishay Group, as applicable, and Vishay shall, and shall cause the applicable members of the Vishay Group to, accept from VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group all of their rights, title and interest in and to all such assets identified on Schedule 2.16 . The terms and provisions of Sections 2.7 , 2.8 , 2.10 , 2.12 , 2.13 and 4.2 as such terms and provisions relate to the contribution, assignment, transfer, conveyance or delivery of assets from Vishay or a member of the Vishay Group to VPG or a member of the VPG Group shall apply to any contribution, assignment, transfer, conveyance or delivery of assets contemplated by this Section 2.16 , mutatis mutandis .
 
      Section 2.17 Net Cash .
 
           (a) No later than fifteen (15) Business Days following the Distribution Date, VPG shall determine the VPG Net Cash as of the opening of business on the Distribution Date (the “ Actual VPG Net Cash ”). As soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than five (5) Business Days after making such determination, VPG shall prepare and deliver to Vishay a calculation of the VPG Net Cash, together with reasonably detailed supporting information (the “ VPG Net Cash Statement ”).
 
- 23 -
 


           (b) Thereafter, VPG will provide Vishay and its accountants with access to the records and employees of VPG, to the extent reasonably related to Vishay’s evaluation of the VPG Net Cash Statement, the calculation of the VPG Net Cash or the resolution of any dispute with respect thereto. Within ten (10) Business Days after Vishay’s receipt of the VPG Net Cash Statement, Vishay shall notify VPG in writing as to whether Vishay agrees or disagrees with the VPG Net Cash Statement, which notice, in the case of a disagreement, shall set forth in reasonable detail the particulars of such disagreement. In the event that Vishay does not provide a notice of disagreement within such ten (10) Business Day period, then Vishay shall be deemed to have accepted the calculations and the amounts set forth in the VPG Net Cash Statement delivered by VPG, which shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes hereunder. If any notice of disagreement is timely provided in accordance with this Section 2.17 , VPG and Vishay shall each use commercially reasonable efforts for a period of ten (10) Business Days thereafter (or such longer period as they may mutually agree) to resolve any disagreements with respect to the calculations in the VPG Net Cash Statement. If, at the end of such period, VPG and Vishay are unable to resolve any disagreements as to items in the VPG Net Cash Statement, then the Parties shall engage KPMG LLP (the “ Auditor ”) to resolve any remaining disagreements. The Auditor shall be charged with determining as promptly as practicable, but in any event within thirty (30) days after the date on which such dispute is referred to the Auditor, whether the Actual VPG Net Cash as set forth in the VPG Net Cash Statement was prepared in accordance with this Agreement whether and to what extent the Actual VPG Net Cash requires adjustment. The fees and expenses of the Auditor shall be shared by VPG and Vishay in inverse proportion to the relative amounts of the disputed amounts determined in favor of VPG and Vishay, respectively. The determination of the Auditor shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes hereunder. The date on which the Actual VPG Net Cash is finally determined in accordance with this Section 2.17 is referred to as the “ Determination Date .”
 
           (c) If the Actual VPG Net Cash, as determined in accordance with this Section 2.17, exceeds $71,500,000, VPG shall make a payment to Vishay in the amount of the excess, which for all purposes shall be deemed a dividend to Vishay from VPG made immediately prior to the Separation. If the Actual VPG Net Cash is less than $58,500,000, Vishay shall make a payment to VPG in the amount of the difference, which for all purposes shall be deemed a capital contribution by Vishay to VPG made immediately prior to the Separation. Such payment by VPG or Vishay, as the case may be, shall be made no later than five (5) Business Days after the Determination Date by wire transfer of immediately available funds.
 
ARTICLE III
 
THE DISTRIBUTION AND ACTIONS PENDING THE DISTRIBUTION
 
      Section 3.1 Transactions Prior to the Distribution . Subject to the conditions specified in Section 3.2 , Vishay and VPG shall use their reasonable best efforts to consummate the Distribution. Such efforts shall include, without limitation, those specified in this Section 3.1 .
 
           (a) Separation Transactions and Capital Allocation Transactions . Vishay and VPG shall cooperate, and shall use their reasonable best efforts, to effect the Separation Transactions and the Capital Allocation Transactions on or prior to the Distribution Date.
 
- 24 -
 


           (b) Form 10 Registration Statement . Vishay and VPG shall cooperate to cause the Form 10 Registration Statement heretofore filed with the Commission to become and remain effective under Applicable Law, including, without limitation, filing such amendments or supplements to the Form 10 Registration Statement as may be required by the Commission or federal, state or foreign securities laws.
 
           (c) Information Statement; Other Materials . Vishay shall, as soon as practicable after the Form 10 Registration Statement is declared effective under the Exchange Act and the Vishay Board has approved the Distribution, cause the Information Statement to be mailed to the Record Holders. Vishay and VPG shall prepare and mail, on or prior to the Distribution Date, to the holders of Vishay Stock, such other Information concerning VPG, the MGF Business, operations and management, the Separation, the Distribution and such other matters as Vishay in its sole and absolute discretion determines is necessary or desirable or as may be required by Applicable Law.
 
           (d) Other Actions . Vishay and VPG shall take all other actions as Vishay in its sole and absolute discretion determines are necessary or appropriate under applicable federal or state securities or blue sky laws of the United States (and any comparable laws under any foreign jurisdiction) in connection with the Distribution.
 
           (e) NYSE Listing . VPG shall prepare, file and use its reasonable best efforts to obtain approval of, an application for listing of VPG common stock on The New York Stock Exchange (“ NYSE ”), subject to official notice of distribution.
 
           (f) Accounting Matters . All prepaid items and reserves that have been maintained by Vishay on a consolidated basis but related in part to Separated Assets or Assumed Liabilities shall be allocated between Vishay and VPG as determined by Vishay in its reasonable discretion.
 
           (g) Corporate Matters . Vishay and VPG shall take all necessary action (i) to adopt the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws of VPG in the form filed as exhibits to the Form 10 Registration Statement and (ii) to cause the Board of Directors of VPG to consist of the persons identified in the Information Statement as the directors of VPG to be in office following the Separation.
 
      Section 3.2 Conditions Precedent to Consummation of the Distribution . The obligation of Vishay to effect the Distribution is subject to the satisfaction or the waiver by Vishay, in its sole and absolute discretion, of each of the following conditions:
 
           (a) Approval by Vishay’s Board . This Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including establishing the Record Date and the declaration of the Distribution, shall have been duly taken and approved by the Vishay Board in accordance with Applicable Law and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Vishay.
 
           (b) Form 10 Registration Statement . The Form 10 Registration Statement shall have been declared effective by the Commission, and there shall be no stop-order in effect with respect thereto, and no proceeding for that purpose shall have been instituted by the Commission.
 
- 25 -
 


           (c) Other Actions . The actions and filings necessary or appropriate under applicable federal and state securities laws and state blue sky laws of the United States (and any comparable laws under any foreign jurisdictions) in connection with the Distribution (including, if applicable, any actions and filings relating to the Form 10 Registration Statement) and any other necessary and applicable Consents shall have been taken, obtained and, where applicable, have become effective or been accepted, each as the case may be.
 
           (d) NYSE Listing . VPG common stock to be distributed pursuant to the Distribution shall have been approved for listing on NYSE, subject to official notice of the Distribution.
 
           (e) No Legal Restraints . No Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction shall have, after the date of this Agreement, enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent), which is in effect and prohibits or materially restricts or materially adversely affects the consummation of the Separation or the Distribution or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements.
 
           (f) Separation . The Separation shall have become effective in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Separation Transactions and the Capital Allocation Transactions.
 
           (g) Private Letter Ruling and Opinion of Tax Counsel . Vishay shall have obtained a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS that the Distribution is part of a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and that the Distribution generally will not give rise to income or gain to Vishay or, pursuant to Section 355, its shareholders, and such ruling shall continue in effect, and Vishay shall have received an opinion of the law firm of Pepper Hamilton LLP to the same effect.
 
           (h) Approval from Israeli Tax Authorities . Vishay shall have received a ruling from the Israeli taxing authorities that the Separation as it relates to the transfer to the VPG Group of Israeli Companies held by the Vishay Group will not give rise to a material amount of current Taxes under any Applicable Law in Israel.
 
           (i) Consents and Approvals . Any and all Consents and Governmental Approvals necessary to consummate the Separation and the Distribution shall have been obtained and be in full force and effect, except where the failure to obtain such consents or approvals would not have a material adverse effect on either (A) the ability of the parties to complete the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or (B) the business, Assets, Liabilities, condition or results of operations of VPG and its Subsidiaries, or Vishay and its Subsidiaries, in each case, taken as a whole (such Consents and Governmental Approvals, “ Material Consents and Approvals ”). As of the date of this Agreement, other than the private letter ruling from the IRS and the ruling from the Israeli taxing authorities listed separately above under Sections 3.2(g) and 3.2(h) respectively, the parties are not aware of any Material Consents and Governmental Approvals.
 
- 26 -
 


           (j) Ancillary Agreements; Performance of Obligations . Vishay shall have received duly executed counterparts of each Ancillary Agreement from the members of the VPG Group party thereto, and VPG (and the applicable members of the VPG Group) shall have fully performed its or their obligations hereunder and thereunder which are required to be performed prior to or at the time of the Distribution.
 
           (k) Other Transactions . The parties shall have consummated any other transactions in connection with the Distribution that are contemplated by the Information Statement to be consummated prior to or at the time of the Distribution and are not specifically referred to in this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements.
 
           (l) No Other Events . No other events or developments shall have occurred that, in the judgment of the Vishay Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, would result in the Separation or the Distribution having a material adverse effect on Vishay, its stockholders, the Vishay Business or the MGF Business.
 
      The foregoing conditions are for the sole benefit of Vishay and shall not give rise to or create any duty on the part of Vishay or the Vishay Board to waive or not to waive any such conditions or in any way limit Vishay’s right to terminate this Agreement as set forth in Article IX or alter the consequences of any such termination from those specified in Article IX . Any determination made by Vishay prior to the Distribution concerning the satisfaction or waiver of any or all of the conditions set forth in this Section 3.2 shall be conclusive.
 
      Section 3.3 Documents to be Delivered by Vishay . On or prior to the Distribution Date, Vishay will deliver, or will cause its appropriate Subsidiaries to deliver, to VPG all of the following:
 
           (a) In each case where Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group is a party to any Ancillary Agreement, a duly executed counterpart of such Ancillary Agreement;
 
           (b) Resignations of each individual listed on Schedule 3.3(b) , who is a director and/or officer of any member of the VPG Group;
 
           (c) Any other agreements, documents and instruments necessary to effectuate the Separation; and
 
           (d) Such other agreements, documents or instruments as the parties may agree are necessary or desirable in order to achieve the purposes hereof.
 
      Section 3.4 Documents to be Delivered by VPG . On or prior to the Distribution Date, VPG will deliver, or will cause its appropriate Subsidiaries to deliver, to Vishay all of the following:
 
           (a) In each case where VPG or any other member of the VPG Group is a party to any Ancillary Agreement, a duly executed counterpart of such Ancillary Agreement;
 
- 27 -
 


           (b) Resignations of each individual listed on Schedule 3.4(b) who is a director and/or officer of any member of the Vishay Group; and
 
           (c) Any other agreements, documents and instruments necessary to effectuate the Separation; and
 
           (d) Such other agreements, documents or instruments as the parties may agree are necessary or desirable in order to achieve the purposes hereof.
 
      Section 3.5 Distribution .
 
           (a) Sole Discretion . Vishay shall, in its sole and absolute discretion, determine whether or not to proceed with all or part of the Distribution, determine the Distribution Date and determine whether to modify or change the terms of the Distribution, including, without limitation, the form, structure and terms of any transaction(s) to effect the Distribution (including the Separation Transactions, the Capital Allocation Transactions and any other transactions provided for in this Agreement) or the timing of and conditions to the consummation of the Distribution. VPG shall cooperate with Vishay in all respects to accomplish the Distribution and shall, at Vishay’s direction, promptly take any and all actions reasonably necessary or desirable in Vishay’s sole and absolute discretion to effect the Distribution.
 
           (b) Effective Time . The Distribution shall be effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Time, on the Distribution Date (the “ Effective Time ”).
 
           (c) Actions in Connection with Distribution . Unless Vishay has previously determined not to proceed with the Separation, Vishay and VPG will cause to be taken the following actions in connection with the Distribution:
 
      (i) VPG shall appoint a registrar and transfer agent (the “ Registrar and Transfer Agent ”) for the purpose of recording the ownership and transfer of record of the holders of VPG common stock and VPG Class B common stock. Such record of ownership and transfer shall be maintained in book entry form only, and no physical certificates evidencing the ownership of the VPG common stock or VPG Class B common stock shall be issued.
 
      (ii) On or prior to the Distribution Date, VPG shall issue to Vishay and Vishay shall deliver to Agent, in each case by appropriate entry on the books and records of the Registrar and Transfer Agent, a sufficient number of shares of VPG common stock and VPG Class B common stock for distribution on the Distribution Date to the Record Holders of Vishay common stock and Vishay Class B common stock, respectively.
 
      (iii) On the Distribution Date, (x) each Record Holder of Vishay common stock will be entitled to receive in the Distribution a number of shares of VPG common stock equal to the number of shares of Vishay common stock held by such Record Holder on the Record Date multiplied by the distribution ratio to be determined by the Vishay Board when it declares the Distribution (the “ Common Stock Distribution Ratio ”), and (y) each Record Holder of Vishay Class B Common Stock will be entitled to receive in the Distribution a number of shares of VPG Class B Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Vishay Class B Common Stock held by such Record Holder on the Record Date multiplied by the distribution ratio to be determined by the Vishay Board when it declares the Distribution (the “ Class B Common Stock Distribution Ratio ”). The Vishay Board shall have the right to adjust the Common Stock Distribution Ratio and/or the Class B Common Stock Distribution Ratio at any time prior to the Distribution.
 
- 28 -
 


      (iv) As promptly as practicable after the Distribution Date, the Registrar and Transfer Agent will send to each Record Holder, at the address of such Record Holder as it appears on the books and records of the registrar and transfer agent for the Vishay common stock and the Vishay Class B common stock, as the case may be, an account statement showing the number of shares of VPG common stock and VPG Class B common stock held by such Record Holder as of the Distribution Date.
 
      (v) Vishay and VPG, as the case may be, will provide to the Agent and the Registrar and Transfer Agent all authorizations and other documentation and any Information required in order to complete the Distribution on the basis set forth in this Section 3.5 . No action will be necessary for any Record Holder of Vishay to receive VPG common stock and/or VPG Class B Common Stock, as applicable, or cash in lieu of fractional shares in the Distribution.
 
           (d) Fractional Shares . No fractional shares of VPG common stock or VPG Class B common stock will be issued. Instead, Record Holders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares, in accordance with the following procedures.
 
      (i) Vishay shall direct the Agent to determine the number of fractional shares of VPG common stock and VPG Class B Common Stock allocable to each Record Holder of Vishay common stock and Vishay Class B Common Stock, as applicable.
 
      (ii) The Agent shall aggregate all fraction shares of VPG common stock and sell the whole shares obtained thereby in open market transactions or otherwise as soon as practicable on or after the Distribution Date at then prevailing trading prices and shall cause to be distributed to each Record Holder of Vishay common stock, in lieu of any fractional share of VPG common stock, such Record Holder’s ratable share of the proceeds of such sale. Solely for purposes of computing fractional share interests pursuant to this Section 3.5(d)(ii) , the beneficial owner of Vishay Stock held of record in the name of a nominee in any nominee account, if and to the extent Vishay is advised in writing of such nominee relationship prior to the Distribution Date, shall be treated as the Record Holder with respect to such shares.
 
- 29 -
 


      (iii) Vishay shall cause to be delivered to the Agent cash in an amount equal to the total of all fractional shares of VPG Class B common stock multiplied by the amount of cash per share of VPG common stock distributed to Record Holders of Vishay common stock in lieu of fractional shares. The Agent shall cause to be distributed to each Record Holder of Vishay Class B common stock, in lieu of any fractional share of VPG Class B common stock, such holder’s ratable share of the cash provided by Vishay.
 
      (iv) All cash in lieu of fractional shares shall be delivered to the Record Holders by check delivered to the address of such holder as it appears on the books and records of the registrar and transfer agent for the Vishay common stock and the Vishay Class B common stock, as the case may be, or by such other means as the Record Holder and the Agent shall agree.
 
ARTICLE IV
 
ADDITIONAL COVENANTS, FURTHER ASSURANCES AND OTHER MATTERS
 
      Section 4.1 Provision of Corporate Records . Prior to or as promptly as practicable after the Distribution Date, each of Vishay and VPG shall deliver or make available to the other all corporate books and records of the other Group in its possession, and complete and accurate copies of all relevant portions of all corporate books and records of the Vishay Group relating directly and primarily to the other’s Business (and, in the case of VPG, relating to the Separated Assets or the Assumed Liabilities), including, in each case, all active agreements, active litigation files, government filings and returns or reports relating to Taxes for all open periods. Subject to Section 4.5 and Section 4.6 , each party may retain complete and accurate copies of such books and records. From and after the Distribution Date, all such books, records and copies shall be the property of the other party. The costs and expenses incurred in the provision of records or other Information to a party shall be paid for by the receiving party, or as the parties shall otherwise agree.
 
      Section 4.2 Further Assurance .
 
           (a) In addition to the actions specifically provided for elsewhere in this Agreement (such as Section 2.7 and Section 2.11(a) ), Vishay and VPG agree to execute or cause to be executed by the appropriate parties and deliver, as appropriate, such other agreements, instruments and other documents as may be necessary or desirable in order to effect the purposes of this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements.
 
           (b) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, at the request of VPG, and without further consideration, Vishay will execute and deliver, and will cause the applicable members of the Vishay Group to execute and deliver, to VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group such other instruments of transfer, conveyance, assignment, substitution, confirmation or other documents and take such action as VPG may reasonably deem necessary or desirable in order to more effectively transfer, convey and assign to VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group and confirm VPG’s and the applicable members’ of the VPG Group title to all of the assets, rights and other things of value contemplated to be transferred to VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group pursuant to this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements, and any documents referred to herein or therein, to put VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group in actual possession and operating control thereof and to permit VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group to exercise all rights with respect thereto (including, without limitation, rights under Contracts and other arrangements as to which the consent of any third party to the transfer thereof shall not have previously been obtained). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, at the request of Vishay and without further consideration, VPG will execute and deliver, and will cause the applicable members of the VPG Group to execute and deliver, to Vishay and the applicable members of the Vishay Group all instruments, assumptions, novations, undertakings, substitutions or other documents and take such other action as Vishay may reasonably deem necessary or desirable in order to have VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group fully and unconditionally assume and discharge the liabilities contemplated to be assumed by VPG and the applicable members of the VPG Group under this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or any document in connection herewith or therewith and to relieve the Vishay and the applicable members of the Vishay Group of any liability or obligation with respect thereto and evidence the same to third parties.
 
- 30 -
 


           (c) Neither Vishay nor VPG shall be obligated, in connection with this Section 4.2 , to expend money other than reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, attorneys’ fees and recording or similar fees, unless reimbursed by the other party.
 
           (d) Furthermore, each party, at the request of the other party, shall execute and deliver such other instruments and do and perform such other acts and things as may be necessary or desirable for effecting completely the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
 
      Section 4.3 Agreement For Exchange Of Information .
 
           (a) Generally . Each of Vishay and VPG, on behalf of its respective Group, agrees to provide, or cause to be provided, to the other party’s Group and its authorized accountants, counsel and other designated representatives, at any time after the Distribution Date, reasonable access during normal business hours and as soon as reasonably practicable after written request therefor, (i) all Information regularly provided by such respective Group to the other Group prior to the Distribution Date, and (ii) any Information in the possession or under the control of such respective Group that the requesting party reasonably needs (A) to comply with reporting, disclosure, filing or other requirements imposed on the requesting party (including under applicable securities and tax laws) by a Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the requesting party, (B) for use in any other judicial, regulatory, administrative or other proceeding or in order to satisfy audit, accounting, claims, regulatory, litigation or other similar requirements, in each case, other than claims or allegations that one party to this Agreement has against the other, (C) to comply with its obligations under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, (D) to comply with reporting, filing and disclosure obligations, (E) for the preparation of financial statements or completing an audit, (F) for use in compensation, benefit or welfare plan administration or other bona fide business purposes or (G) for the conduct of the ongoing businesses of Vishay or VPG, as the case may be; provided, however , that in the event that either Vishay or VPG determines that any such provision of or access to Information would be commercially detrimental in any material respect, violate any Applicable Law or agreement or waive any Privilege, the parties shall take all reasonable measures to permit the compliance with such obligations in a manner that avoids any such harm or consequence and shall comply with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. Each of Vishay and VPG agree to make their respective personnel available during normal business hours to discuss the Information exchanged pursuant to this Section 4.3 provided , that such access does not interfere with the day-to-day operations of the applicable party.
 
- 31 -
 


           (b) Financial Information . Without limiting the generality of Section 4.3(a) , until the end of the first full VPG fiscal year occurring after the Distribution Date (and for a reasonable period of time afterwards as required for each party to prepare consolidated financial statements or complete a financial statement audit for the fiscal year during which the Distribution Date occurs), each party shall use its commercially reasonable efforts, to cooperate with the other party’s Information requests to enable the other party to meet its timetable for dissemination (in accordance with applicable securities laws) of its earnings releases and financial statements and to enable such other party’s auditors to timely complete their audit of the annual financial statements and review of the quarterly financial statements of such party.
 
           (c) Ownership of Information . Any Information owned by a party that is provided to the other party pursuant to this Section 4.3 shall be deemed to remain the property of the party that owned and provided such Information. Unless specifically set forth herein, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as granting or conferring rights of license or ownership in any Information owned by one party hereunder to the other party hereunder.
 
           (d) Record Retention . Except with respect to Information for which a different retention policy is specified in an Ancillary Agreement, to facilitate the exchange of Information contemplated by this Section 4.3 and other provisions of this Agreement after the Distribution Date, each party agrees to, and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the members of its Group to, retain all Information related to the MGF Business in their respective possession or control on the Distribution Date in accordance with the record retention and destruction policies of the applicable Business, as in effect immediately prior to the Distribution Date or such other policies and procedures as may reasonably be adopted by the applicable party after the Distribution Date as provided herein. No party will destroy, or permit any member of its Group to destroy, any Information which the other party may have the right to obtain pursuant to this Agreement without first notifying the other party of the proposed destruction and giving the other party the opportunity to take possession of such Information prior to such destruction; provided , however , that no party will destroy, or permit any member of its Group to destroy, any Information required to be retained by Applicable Law.
 
           (e) Limitation of Liability . Each party will use its reasonable best efforts to ensure that Information provided to the other party is accurate and complete; provided , however , that, except as otherwise provided in any Ancillary Agreement, in the absence of gross negligence or willful misconduct by the party providing such Information, no party shall have any liability to any other party in the event that any Information exchanged or provided pursuant to this Section 4.3 is found to be inaccurate. No party shall have any liability to the other party if any Information is destroyed after commercially reasonable efforts by such party to comply with the provision of this Section 4.3 .
 
- 32 -
 


           (f) Other Agreements Providing for Exchange of Information . The rights and obligations granted under this Section 4.3 are subject to any specific limitations, qualifications or additional provisions on the sharing, exchange or confidential treatment of Information set forth in this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement.
 
           (g) Compensation for Providing Information . The party requesting Information agrees to reimburse the other party for the reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses, if any, of creating, gathering and copying such Information, to the extent that such costs and expenses are incurred for the benefit of the requesting party.
 
      Section 4.4 Production of Witnesses; Records; Cooperation .
 
           (a) Subject to Section 4.6 , after the Distribution Date, except in the case of any Action by one or more members of one Group against one or more members of the other Group, each party shall use its reasonable best efforts to make available to the other party, upon written request, the former, current and future directors, officers, employees, other personnel and agents of the members of its respective Group as witnesses and any books, records or other documents within its control or which it otherwise has the ability to make available, to the extent that any such Person (giving consideration to business demands of such directors, officers, employees, other personnel and agents) or books, records or other documents may reasonably be required in connection with any Action in which the requesting party may from time to time be involved, regardless of whether such Action is a matter with respect to which indemnification may be sought hereunder. The requesting party shall reimburse the other party for its reasonable out-of-pocket cost and expenses in connection with requests made under this Section 4.4 .
 
           (b) Without limiting the forgoing but subject to Section 4.6 , the parties shall cooperate and consult to the extent reasonably necessary with respect to any Action, except in the case of an adversarial Action by one or more members of one Group against one or more members of the other Group.
 
      Section 4.5 Confidentiality .
 
           (a) Subject to Section 4.6 , which shall govern Privileged Information, from and after the Distribution Date, Vishay and VPG shall hold and shall cause each member of their respective Groups to hold, and shall each cause their respective directors, officers, employees, agents, consultants, advisors and other representatives to hold, in strict confidence and not to disclose or release without the prior written consent of the other party, any and all Confidential Information of the other party’s Group; provided , that each party may disclose, or may permit disclosure of, Confidential Information (i) to its respective auditors, attorneys, financial advisors, bankers and other appropriate consultants and advisors who have a need to know such Confidential Information and are informed of such party’s obligation to hold such Information confidential to the same extent as is applicable to the parties and in respect of whose failure to comply with such obligations, VPG or Vishay, as the case may be, will be responsible, (ii) if such party or any of the members of such party’s respective Group is compelled to disclose any such Information by judicial or administrative process or, in the opinion of independent legal counsel, by other requirements of Applicable Law, (iii) if any such Information is or becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of a disclosure in violation of this Agreement or (iv) if such Information was or becomes available to either VPG or Vishay or any member of their respective Group on a non-confidential basis and from a source (other than a party to this Agreement or any Affiliate, director, officer, employee, agent, consultant, advisor and other representative of such party) that is not known after actual inquiry to be bound by a confidentiality obligation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any demand or request for disclosure of Confidential Information is made pursuant to clause (ii) above, Vishay or VPG, as the case may be, shall promptly notify the other of the existence of such request or demand and shall provide the other a reasonable opportunity to seek an appropriate confidentiality agreement, protective order or other remedy at the reasonable cost and expense of the disclosing party and which both parties will cooperate in obtaining. In the event that such appropriate protective order or other remedy is not obtained, the party whose Confidential Information is required to be disclosed shall, or shall cause to be, furnished, only that portion of the Confidential Information that is legally required to be disclosed.
 
- 33 -
 


           (b) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Vishay and the members of its Group, on the one hand, and VPG and the members of its Group, on the other hand, shall be deemed to have satisfied their obligations hereunder with respect to Confidential Information if they exercise the same degree of care (but no less than a reasonable degree of care) as they take to preserve confidentiality for their own similar Information.
 
           (c) Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or prohibit either party from independently creating or developing (or having created or developed for it), or from acquiring from third parties, any Information similar to or competitive with the Information contemplated by or embodied in the other party’s Confidential Information, provided that in connection with such creation, development or acquisition such party does not violate any of its obligations under this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or any other agreement with the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither party shall, nor shall it assist others to, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, or otherwise attempt to recreate, the other party’s Confidential Information.
 
      Section 4.6 Privileged Matters .
 
           (a) Vishay and VPG agree that their respective rights and obligations to maintain, preserve, assert or waive any or all privileges belonging to either party or the respective members of their respective Group with respect to the Vishay Business or the MGF Business, including but not limited to the attorney-client, work product privileges or any other applicable privileges (individually, a “ Privilege ”), shall be governed by the provisions of this Section 4.6 . With respect to Privileged Information of Vishay, Vishay shall have sole authority in perpetuity to determine whether to assert or waive any or all Privileges, and VPG shall take no action (nor permit any member of its Group to take action) without the prior written consent of Vishay that could result in any waiver of any Privilege that could be asserted by Vishay or any member of its Group under Applicable Law and this Agreement. With respect to Privileged Information of VPG, VPG shall have sole authority in perpetuity to determine whether to assert or waive any or all Privileges, and Vishay shall take no action (nor permit any member of its Group to take action) without the prior written consent of VPG that could result in any waiver of any Privilege that could be asserted by VPG or any member of its Group under Applicable Law and this Agreement. The rights and obligations created by this Section 4.6 shall apply to all Information (“ Privileged Information ”) as to which Vishay or VPG or their respective Groups would be entitled to assert or have asserted a Privilege without regard to the effect, if any, of the Separation and the Distribution. Privileged Information of Vishay and its Group includes but is not limited to (w) any and all Information satisfying the criteria of the preceding sentence regarding the Vishay Business and its Group (other than Information satisfying the criteria of the preceding sentence relating to the MGF Business (“ VPG Information ”)), whether or not such Information (other than VPG Information) is in the possession of VPG or any member of its Group; and (x) all communications subject to a Privilege between counsel for Vishay (including any Person who, at the time of the communication, was an employee of Vishay or its Group in the capacity of in-house counsel, regardless of whether such employee is or becomes an employee of VPG or any member of its Group) and any Person who, at the time of the communication, was an employee of Vishay, regardless of whether such employee is or becomes an employee of VPG or any member of its Group. Privileged Information of VPG and its Group includes but is not limited to (x) any and all VPG Information, whether or not it is in the possession of Vishay or any member of its Group; and (y) all communications subject to a Privilege occurring after the Distribution between counsel for the MGF Business (including in-house counsel and former in-house counsel who are employees of Vishay) and any Person who, at the time of the communication, was an employee of VPG, any member of its Group or the MGF Business regardless of whether such employee was, is or becomes an employee of Vishay or any member of its Group.
 
- 34 -
 


           (b) Upon receipt by Vishay or VPG, or any of the members of the respective Groups, as the case may be, of any subpoena, discovery or other request from any third party that actually or arguably calls for the production or disclosure of Privileged Information of the other or if Vishay or VPG, or any of members of their respective Groups, as the case may be, obtains knowledge that any current or former employee of Vishay or VPG, as the case may be, receives any subpoena, discovery or other request from any third party that actually or arguably calls for the production or disclosure of Privileged Information of the other, Vishay or VPG, as the case may be, shall promptly notify the other of the existence of the request and shall provide the other a reasonable opportunity to review the Information and to assert any rights it may have under this Section 4.6 or otherwise to prevent the production or disclosure of Privileged Information. Vishay or VPG, as the case may be, will not, and will cause the members of their respective Groups to not, produce or disclose to any third party any of the other’s Privileged Information under this Section 4.6 unless (i) the non-disclosing party has provided its express written consent to such production or disclosure or (ii) a court of competent jurisdiction has entered an order not subject to interlocutory appeal or review (or for which the period for appeal or review has lapsed) finding that the Information is not entitled to protection from disclosure under any applicable privilege, doctrine or rule, in which case, such Information shall be subject to Section 4.5 .
 
           (c) Vishay’s transfer of books and records pertaining to the MGF Business and other Information to VPG, Vishay’s agreement to permit VPG to obtain Information existing prior to the Distribution, VPG’s transfer of books and records pertaining to the Vishay Business, if any, and other Information to Vishay and VPG’s agreement to permit Vishay to obtain Information existing prior to the Distribution are made in reliance on Vishay’s and VPG’s respective agreements, as set forth in Section 4.5 and this Section 4.6 , to maintain the confidentiality of such Information and to take the steps provided herein for the preservation of all Privileges that may belong to or be asserted by Vishay or VPG, as the case may be. The access to Information, witnesses and individuals being granted pursuant to Sections 4.3 and 4.4 and the disclosure to VPG and Vishay of Privileged Information relating to the MGF Business or the Vishay Business pursuant to this Agreement in connection with the Separation and Distribution shall not be asserted by Vishay or VPG to constitute, or otherwise deemed, a waiver of any Privilege that has been or may be asserted under this Section 4.6 or otherwise. Nothing in this Agreement shall operate to reduce, minimize or condition the rights granted to Vishay and VPG in, or the obligations imposed upon Vishay and VPG by, this Section 4.6 .
 
- 35 -
 


      Section 4.7 Cooperation with Respect to Know-how . Neither party shall knowingly utilize or incorporate into its products or services the confidential know-how or other proprietary technical information of the other party without the express, prior written consent of the other party. The parties agree that if a party reasonably believes that the other party has or may have an interest or expectation of ownership in know-how or other technical information that has come to the attention of the personnel of the first party and that the first party proposes to utilize in its products, services or other aspects of its business, the first party shall bring this to the attention of the other party. Thereafter, the parties shall discuss in good faith the use of such know-how or other technical information to determine whether such information is the exclusive property of one of the parties or if it is information in which both parties have an interest or expectation of ownership. If it is determined that the know-how or other technical information is the exclusive property of one of the parties, the other party may request a license to utilize such information for development of or incorporation into its products and services or in other aspects of its business. In such case, the other party shall in good faith consider the request for a license, including the financial arrangements and other terms that the first party proposes for such a license. Nothing, however, shall require a party to enter into such a license or to act against its commercial interests as determined by such party. For the purpose of the discussions contemplated by this Section 4.7 , each party shall at all times designate by notice to the other party one or more individuals at a level equal to or above divisional P&L leader who shall be available to engage in such discussions at the request of the other party.
 
      Section 4.8 VPG Exchangeable Notes and VPG Warrants; Registration . VPG agrees to take the following actions:
 
           (a) Issue notes exchangeable for shares of VPG common stock (the “ VPG Exchangeable Notes ”) to such Persons, in such amounts, upon such terms and at such time as required by that certain Put and Call Agreement dated as of December 13, 2002, by and between Vishay and each of the holders of the Notes due December 31, 2102 issued by Vishay.
 
           (b) Issue warrants to acquire VPG common stock (the “ VPG Warrants ”) to such Persons, in such amounts, upon such terms and at such time as required by that certain Warrant Agreement dated as of December 13, 2002, by and between Vishay and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company.
 
           (c) Register the shares of VPG common stock issuable upon (i) exchange of the VPG Exchangeable Notes or (ii) exercise of the VPG Warrants, on a resale registration statement on such terms and within such time periods as required by that certain Securities Investment and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 13, 2002, by and among Vishay, Phoenix Acquisition Company S.a.r.l., Phoenix Bermuda, LP and certain other persons as set forth therein.
 
- 36 -
 


      Section 4.9 Tax Matters . All matters relating to Taxes shall be governed exclusively by the Tax Matters Agreement, except as may be expressly stated herein or therein. In the event of any inconsistency with respect to such matters between the Tax Matters Agreement and this Agreement or any other Ancillary Agreement, the Tax Matters Agreement shall govern to the extent of the inconsistency.
 
      Section 4.10 Employee Matters . All matters relating to or arising out of any employee benefit, compensation or welfare arrangement in respect of any present and former employee of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group shall be governed by the Employee Matters Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency with respect to such matters between the Employee Matters Agreement and this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, the Employee Matters Agreement shall govern to the extent of the inconsistency; provided, however, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in the Employee Matters Agreement, for the period from and after the Distribution Date, Vishay shall have no responsibility for the compensation or benefits of any of the executives or other employees of VPG, including those who were employed by Vishay prior to the Separation.
 
      Section 4.11 Intellectual Property . All matters relating to the ownership and right to use Intellectual Property shall be governed exclusively by the License Agreements, as applicable, except as may be expressly stated herein or therein. In the event of any inconsistency with respect to such matters between a particular License Agreement and this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, such particular License Agreement shall govern to the extent of the inconsistency.
 
      Section 4.12 Services Support . All matters relating to the provision of support and other services by the Vishay Group to the VPG Group after the Effective Time, covered by the Transition Services Agreement, shall be governed exclusively by the Transition Services Agreement, except as may be expressly stated herein or therein. In the event of any inconsistency with respect to such matters between the Transition Services Agreement and this Agreement or any other Ancillary Agreement, the Transition Services Agreement shall govern to the extent of the inconsistency.
 
      Section 4.13 Real Property . All matters relating to real property to be leased, subleased, occupied, or shared either Group after the Effective Time shall be governed by the Lease Agreements, except as may be expressly stated herein or therein. In the event of any inconsistency with respect to such matters between a particular Lease Agreements and this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, such particular Lease Agreement shall govern to the extent of the inconsistency.
 
- 37 -
 


ARTICLE V
 
SURVIVAL AND INDEMNIFICATION
 
      Section 5.1 Mutual Release .
 
           (a) Effective as of the Distribution Date and except as otherwise specifically set forth in the Ancillary Agreements, each of Vishay, on behalf of itself and each member of the Vishay Group, on the one hand, and VPG, on behalf of itself and each member of the VPG Group, on the other hand, hereby unequivocally, unconditionally and irrevocably releases and forever discharges the other party and the members of such party’s Group, and its and their respective current and former directors, officers, managers or other Persons acting in a similar capacity, agents, record and beneficial security holders (including trustees and beneficiaries of trusts holding such securities), advisors, accountants, attorneys and other representatives (in each case, in their respective capacities as such) and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, of and from, all Liabilities whatsoever of every name and nature, whether at law or in equity (including any right of contribution), whether arising under any Contract, by operation of law or otherwise, existing or arising from any acts or events occurring or failing to occur or alleged to have occurred or to have failed to occur or any conditions existing or alleged to have existed on or before the Distribution Date, whether or not known on the Distribution Date, whether fixed or contingent, and whether or not concealed or hidden, including in connection with the transactions and all other activities to implement the Separation and the Distributions.
 
           (b) Nothing contained in Section 5.1(a) shall impair any right of any party (or any of the respective members of such party’s Group) to enforce this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or any other Contracts that are contemplated by Section 2.11(b) or the applicable Schedules thereto, nor shall anything contained in those sections be interpreted as terminating as of the Distribution Date any rights under any such Contracts. For purposes of clarification, nothing contained in Section 5.1(a) shall release any Person from:
 
      (i) any Liability provided in or resulting from any agreement among any member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group that is specified in Section 2.11(b) or the applicable Schedules thereto as not to terminate as of the Distribution Date, or any other Liability specified in such Section 2.11(b) as not to terminate as of the Distribution Date;
 
      (ii) any Liability, contingent or otherwise, assumed, transferred, assigned or allocated to the Group of which such Person is a member in accordance with, or any other Liability of any member of any Group under, this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement;
 
      (iii) any Liability for the sale, lease, construction or receipt of goods, property or services purchased, obtained or used in the ordinary course of business by a member of one Group from a member of any other Group prior to the Distribution Date;
 
- 38 -
 


      (iv) any Liability for unpaid amounts for products or services or refunds owing on products or services due on a value-received basis for work done by a member of one Group at the request or on behalf of a member of another Group;
 
      (v) any Liability that the parties may have with respect to indemnification or contribution pursuant to this Agreement for claims brought against the parties by third Persons, which Liability shall be governed by the provisions of this Article V and Article VI and, if applicable, the appropriate provisions of the Ancillary Agreements; or
 
      (vi) any Liability the release of which would result in the release of any Person other than a Person released pursuant to this Section 5.1 .
 
      In addition, nothing contained in Section 5.1(a) shall release any party from honoring its existing obligations to indemnify any director, officer or employee of either Group who was a director, officer or employee of such party on or prior to the Distribution Date, to the extent that such director, officer or employee becomes a named defendant in any litigation involving such party and was entitled to such indemnification pursuant to then existing obligations.
 
           (c) Neither Vishay nor VPG shall make, nor shall either permit any other member of its Group to make, any claim or demand, or commence any Action asserting any claim or demand, including any claim of contribution or any indemnification, against the other or any member of the other Group or any other Person released pursuant to Section 5.1(a) , with respect to any Liabilities released pursuant to Section 5.1(a) .
 
           (d) It is the intent of Vishay and VPG by virtue of the provisions of this Section 5.1 to provide for a full and complete release and discharge of all Liabilities existing or arising from all acts and events occurring or failing to occur or alleged to have occurred or to have failed to occur and all conditions existing or alleged to have existed on or before the Distribution Date, between or among Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group, on the one hand, and VPG or any member of the VPG Group, on the other hand (including any contractual agreements or arrangements existing or alleged to exist between or among any such members on or before the Distribution Date), except as expressly set forth in Section 5.1(b) . At any time, at the request of any other party, each party shall cause each member of its respective Group to execute and deliver releases reflecting the provisions hereof.
 
      Section 5.2 Indemnification by Vishay . Vishay shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless VPG, each member of the VPG Group and each of their respective current and former directors, officers and employees, and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (collectively, the “ VPG Indemnified Parties ”), from and against any and all Liabilities of VPG Indemnified Parties relating to, arising out of or resulting from any of the following items (without duplication):
 
           (a) the failure of Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group or any other Person to pay, perform or otherwise promptly discharge any Liabilities of the Vishay Group other than the Assumed Liabilities whether prior to or after the date hereof;
 
- 39 -
 


           (b) the conduct of the Vishay Business;
 
           (c) any Liability of the Vishay Group (including the Excluded Assumed Liabilities) other than the Assumed Liabilities;
 
           (d) any Environmental Liabilities under Section 2.5(b)(v) ;
 
           (e) any breach of, or failure to perform or comply with, any covenant, undertaking or obligation of, this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreements, by Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group; and
 
           (f) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of material fact or omission or alleged omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, in each case to the extent relating to Vishay Group contained in the Form 10 Registration Statement, the Information Statement or any other registration statements filed by VPG or Vishay in connection with the Distribution.
 
      Section 5.3 Indemnification by VPG . VPG shall indemnify defend and hold harmless Vishay, each member of the Vishay Group and each of their respective current and former directors, officers and employees, and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (collectively, the “ Vishay Indemnified Parties ”) from and against any and all Liabilities of the Vishay Indemnified Parties relating to, arising out of or resulting from any of the following items (without duplication):
 
           (a) the failure of VPG or any other member of the VPG Group or any other Person to pay, perform or otherwise promptly discharge any Assumed Liabilities in accordance with their respective terms, whether prior to or after the date hereof;
 
           (b) the conduct of the MGF Business;
 
           (c) any Assumed Liability;
 
           (d) any Environmental Liabilities under Section 2.5(a)(v) ;
 
           (e) any breach of, or failure to perform or comply with, any covenant, undertaking or obligation of, this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreements, by VPG or any member of the VPG Group; and
 
           (f) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact or omission or alleged omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, in each case to the extent relating to the VPG Group contained in the Form 10 Registration Statement, the Information Statement or any other registration statements filed by VPG in connection with the Distribution.
 
      Section 5.4 Tax Indemnification . Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, indemnification for matters subject to the Tax Matters Agreement shall be governed by the terms, provisions and procedures of the Tax Matters Agreement and not by this Article V .
 
- 40 -
 


      Section 5.5 Indemnification Obligations Net of Insurance Proceeds and Other Amounts .
 
           (a) The parties intend that any Liability subject to indemnification or reimbursement pursuant to this Article V or Article VI will be net of Insurance Proceeds that actually reduce the amount of the Liability. Accordingly, the amount which any party (an “ Indemnifying Party ”) is required to pay to any Person entitled to indemnification hereunder (an “ Indemnified Party ”) will be reduced by any Insurance Proceeds theretofore actually received, realized or recovered by or on behalf of the Indemnified Party in reduction of the related Liability. If an Indemnified Party receives a payment (an “ Indemnity Payment ”) required by this Agreement from an Indemnifying Party in respect of any Liability and subsequently receives Insurance Proceeds that actually reduce the amount of the Liability, then the Indemnified Party will pay to the Indemnifying Party an amount equal to the excess of the Indemnity Payment received over the amount of the Indemnity Payment that would have been due if the Insurance Proceeds had been received, realized or recovered before the Indemnity Payment was made.
 
           (b) In the case of any Shared Contingent Liability, any Insurance Proceeds actually received, realized or recovered by any party in respect of the Shared Contingent Liability will be shared among the parties in such manner as may be necessary so that the obligations of the parties for such Shared Contingent Liability, net of such Insurance Proceeds, will remain in proportion to their respective Shared Percentages, regardless of which party or parties may actually receive, realize or recover such Insurance Proceeds.
 
           (c) An insurer who would otherwise be obligated to pay any claim shall not be relieved of the responsibility with respect thereto or, solely by virtue of the indemnification provisions hereof, have any subrogation rights with respect thereto, it being expressly understood and agreed that no insurer or any other third party shall be entitled to a “wind-fall” ( i.e. , a benefit they would not be entitled to receive in the absence of the indemnification provisions) by virtue of the indemnification provisions hereof. Nothing contained in this Agreement or in any Ancillary Agreement shall obligate any member of any Group to seek to collect or recover any Insurance Proceeds; provided , that such member is capable of fulfilling and meeting any of its obligations as an Indemnifying Party under this Agreement (including, but not limited to the ability to make a full payment on any indemnification obligation).
 
      Section 5.6 Procedures for Indemnification of Third Party Claims .
 
           (a) If an Indemnified Party shall receive notice or otherwise learn of the assertion by a Person (including any Governmental Authority) who is not a member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group of any claim or of the commencement by any such Person of any Action (collectively, a “ Third Party Claim ”) with respect to which an Indemnifying Party may be obligated to provide indemnification to such Indemnified Party pursuant to Section 5.2 or Section 5.3 or any other section of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, such Indemnified Party shall give such Indemnifying Party written notice thereof within twenty (20) days after becoming aware of such Third Party Claim. Any such notice shall describe the Third Party Claim in reasonable detail. If any Person shall receive notice or otherwise learn of the assertion of a Third Party Claim which may reasonably be determined to be a Shared Contingent Liability, such Person shall give the other party to this Agreement written notice thereof within twenty (20) days after becoming aware of such Third Party Claim. Any such notice shall describe the Third Party Claim in reasonable detail. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the failure of any Indemnified Party or other Person to give notice as provided in this Section 5.6(a) shall not relieve the related Indemnifying Party of its obligations under this Article V , except to the extent that such Indemnifying Party is actually prejudiced by such failure to give notice.
 
- 41 -
 


           (b) If the Indemnifying Party receiving any notice pursuant to Section 5.6(a) or the Indemnified Party believes that the Third Party Claim is or may be a Shared Contingent Liability, such party may make a Determination Request with respect thereto. Vishay shall be entitled (but not obligated) to assume the defense of such Third Party Claim as if it were the Indemnifying Party hereunder until a determination on whether such Third Party Claim is a Shared Contingent Liability. In any such event, Vishay shall be entitled to reimbursement of all the costs and expenses of such defense once a final determination or acknowledgment is made as to the status of the Third Party Claim; provided , that, if such Third Party Claim is determined to be a Shared Contingent Liability, such costs and expenses shall be shared as provided in Section 5.6(c) . If it is determined by the parties or the Contingent Claim Committee that the Third Party Claim is a Shared Contingent Liability, the Indemnifying Party determined to have a majority of the Shared Percentage of such Shared Contingent Liability shall assume the defense of such Third Party Claim; provided , that such Indemnifying Party is solvent. If the Indemnifying Party with a majority of the Shared Contingent Liability is insolvent, the Indemnifying Party with less than a majority of the Shared Contingent Liability shall be entitled (but not obligated) to assume the defense of such Third Party Claim.
 
           (c) The costs and expenses of assuming the defense of any Third Party Claim that is a Shared Contingent Liability (subject to Section 5.6(b) ), and/or seeking to settle or compromise (subject to Section 5.6(g) ) shall be included in the calculation of the amount of the applicable Shared Contingent Liability in determining the reimbursement obligations of the other parties with respect thereto pursuant to Section 6.3 . Any Indemnified Party in respect of a Shared Contingent Liability shall have the right to employ separate counsel and to participate in (but not control) the defense, compromise, or settlement thereof, but all fees and expenses of such counsel shall be the expense of such Indemnified Party.
 
           (d) Other than in the case of a Shared Contingent Liability, an Indemnifying Party may elect to defend (and, unless the Indemnifying Party has specified any reservations or exceptions, to seek to settle or compromise), at such Indemnifying Party’s own expense and by such Indemnifying Party’s own counsel, any Third Party Claim. Within thirty (30) days after the receipt of notice from an Indemnified Party in accordance with Section 5.6(a) (or sooner, if the nature of such Third Party Claim so requires), the Indemnifying Party shall notify the Indemnified Party of its election whether the Indemnifying Party will assume responsibility for defending such Third Party Claim, which election shall specify any reservations or exceptions. After notice from an Indemnifying Party to an Indemnified Party of its election to assume the defense of a Third Party Claim, such Indemnified Party shall have the right to employ separate counsel and to participate in (but not control) the defense, compromise, or settlement thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall be the expense of such Indemnified Party.
 
           (e) Other than in the case of a Shared Contingent Liability, if an Indemnifying Party elects not to assume responsibility for defending a Third Party Claim, or fails to notify an Indemnified Party of its election as provided in Section 5.6(d) , such Indemnified Party may defend such Third Party Claim at the cost and expense of the Indemnifying Party.
 
- 42 -
 


           (f) Unless the Indemnifying Party has failed to assume the defense of the Third Party Claim in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, no Indemnified Party may settle or compromise any Third Party Claim that is not a Shared Contingent Liability without the consent of the Indemnifying Party. No Indemnified Party may settle or compromise any Third Party Claim that is a Shared Contingent Liability without the consent of the Indemnifying Party that is entitled to or has assumed the defense of such Third Party Claim.
 
           (g) In the case of a Third Party Claim that is not a Shared Contingent Liability, no Indemnifying Party shall consent to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement of the Third Party Claim without the consent of the Indemnified Party if the effect thereof is to permit any injunction, declaratory judgment, other order or other nonmonetary relief to be entered, directly or indirectly against any Indemnified Party. In the case of a Third Party Claim that is a Shared Contingent Liability, the Indemnifying Party that has assumed the defense of such Third Party Claim shall not consent to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement of the Third Party Claim without the consent of the Indemnified Party if the effect thereof is to permit any injunction, declaratory judgment, other order or other nonmonetary relief to be entered, directly or indirectly, against any Indemnified Party; provided , however , the Indemnifying Party shall not need to obtain the consent of the Indemnified Party if the Indemnified Party is insolvent.
 
      Section 5.7 Procedures for Indemnification of Direct Claims . Any claim for indemnification made directly by the Indemnified Party against the Indemnifying Party that does not result from a Third Party Claim shall be asserted by written notice from the Indemnified Party to the Indemnifying Party specifically claiming indemnification hereunder. Such Indemnifying Party shall have a period of forty-five (45) days after the receipt of such notice within which to respond thereto. If such Indemnifying Party does not respond within such forty-five (45) day period, such Indemnifying Party shall be deemed to have accepted responsibility to make payment and shall have no further right to contest the validity of such claim. If such Indemnifying Party does respond within such forty-five (45) day period and rejects such claim in whole or in part, such Indemnified Party shall be free to pursue resolution as provided in Article VIII .
 
      Section 5.8 Payments . The Indemnifying Party shall pay all amounts payable pursuant to this Article V by wire transfer of immediately available funds, promptly following receipt from an Indemnified Party of a statement therefor, together with all accompanying reasonably detailed backup documentation, for a Liability that is the subject of indemnification hereunder, unless the Indemnifying Party in good faith disputes the Liability, in which event it shall so notify the Indemnified Party. In any event, the Indemnifying Party shall pay to the Indemnified Party, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, the amount of any Liability for which it is liable hereunder no later than ten (10) Business Days following any final determination of such Liability and the Indemnifying Party’s liability therefor. A “ final determination ” shall exist when (a) the parties to the dispute have reached an agreement in writing, (b) a court of competent jurisdiction shall have entered a final and non-appealable order
 
- 43 -
 


or judgment or (c) an arbitration or like panel shall have rendered a final non-appealable determination with respect to disputes the parties have agreed to submit thereto.
 
      Section 5.9 Contribution . If the indemnification provided for in this Article V shall, for any reason, be unavailable or insufficient to hold harmless an Indemnified Party hereunder in respect of any Liability, then the Indemnifying Party shall, in lieu of indemnifying such Indemnified Party, contribute to the amount paid or payable by such Indemnified Party as a result of such Liability, in such proportion as shall be sufficient to place the Indemnified Party in the same position as if such Indemnified Party were indemnified hereunder, the parties intending that their respective contributions hereunder be as close as possible to the indemnification under Section 5.2 and Section 5.3 . If the contribution provided for in the previous sentence shall, for any reason, be unavailable or insufficient to put the Indemnified Party in the same position as if it were indemnified under Section 5.2 or Section 5.3 , as the case may be, then the Indemnifying Party shall contribute to the amount paid or payable by such Indemnified Party as a result of such Liability, in such proportion as shall be appropriate to reflect the relative benefits received by and the relative fault of the Indemnifying Party on the one hand and the Indemnified Party on the other hand with respect to the matter giving rise to the Liability.
 
      Section 5.10 Remedies Cumulative . The rights and remedies provided in this Article V shall be cumulative and, subject to the provisions of Article VIII , shall not preclude assertion by any Indemnified Party of any other rights or the seeking of any and all other remedies against any Indemnifying Party.
 
      Section 5.11 Survival of Indemnities . The rights and obligations of each of Vishay and VPG and their respective Indemnified Parties under this Article V shall survive the distribution, sale or other transfer by any party of any Assets or the delegation or assignment by it of any Liabilities.
 
ARTICLE VI
 
CONTINGENT GAINS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
 
      Section 6.1 Contingent Gains .
 
           (a) Each of Vishay and VPG shall have the sole and exclusive right to any benefit received with respect to any Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain and any Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain, respectively. Each of Vishay and VPG shall have the sole and exclusive authority to commence, prosecute, settle, manage, control, conduct, waive, forego, release, discharge, forgive and otherwise determine all matters whatsoever with respect to any such Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain or Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain, as the case may be.
 
- 44 -
 


           (b) Any benefit that may be received from any Shared Contingent Gain shall be shared between Vishay and VPG in proportion to the Shared Vishay Percentage and the Shared VPG Percentage, respectively, and shall be paid in accordance with Section 6.4 . If it is determined by the parties or the Contingent Claim Committee that a Contingent Gain is a Shared Contingent Gain, the party determined to have a majority of the Shared Percentage of such Shared Contingent Gain shall have the sole and exclusive authority to commence, prosecute, settle, manage, control, conduct, waive, forgo, release, discharge, forgive and otherwise determine all matters whatsoever with respect to such Shared Contingent Gain. The party with a minority interest in such Shared Contingent Gain shall not take, or permit any member of its Group to take, any action (including commencing any Action) that would interfere with such rights and powers of the other party. The party with a majority of the Shared Percentage of such Shared Contingent Gain shall use its reasonable best efforts to notify the other party in the event that it commences an Action with respect to a Shared Contingent Gain; provided , that the failure to provide such notice shall not give rise to any rights on the part of the other party against such party or affect any other provision of this Section 6.1 . The party with a majority of the Shared Percentage of such Shared Contingent Gain may elect not to pursue any Shared Contingent Gain for any reason whatsoever (including a different assessment of the merits of any Action, claim or right than the other party or any business reasons that are in the best interests of such party or a member of such party’s Group, without regard to the best interests of any member of the other Group) and no member of the Group with a majority interest in such Shared Contingent Gain shall have any liability to any Person (including any member of the other Group) as a result of any such determination.
 
           (c) In the event of any dispute as to whether any claim or right is a Contingent Gain or whether any Contingent Gain is a Shared Contingent Gain, an Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain or an Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain, Vishay may, but shall not be obligated to, commence prosecution or other assertion of such claim or right pending resolution of such dispute. In the event that Vishay commences any such prosecution or assertion and, upon resolution of the dispute, it is determined hereunder that VPG has the exclusive right to such claim or right, Vishay shall, promptly upon the request of VPG, discontinue the prosecution or assertion of such right or claim and transfer the control thereof to VPG. In such event, VPG will reimburse Vishay for all costs and expenses, reasonably incurred prior to resolution of such dispute in the prosecution or assertion of such claim or right.
 
      Section 6.2 Exclusive Contingent Liabilities . Each Exclusive Contingent Liability shall constitute a Liability for which indemnification is provided by Vishay or VPG, as the case may be, pursuant to Article V and shall be subject to the procedures set forth in Article V with respect thereto.
 
      Section 6.3 Shared Contingent Liabilities .
 
           (a) As set forth in Section 5.6(c) and subject to Section 5.6(g) , any Third Party Claim that is a Shared Contingent Liability, and the costs and expenses thereof, shall be included in the calculation of the amount of the applicable Shared Contingent Liability in determining the reimbursement obligations of the other parties with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 6.3 .
 
           (b) Each of Vishay and VPG shall be responsible for its Shared Percentage of any Shared Contingent Liability. It shall not be a defense to any obligation by any party to pay any amount in respect of any Shared Contingent Liability that such party was not consulted in the defense thereof, that such party’s views or opinions as to the conduct of such defense were not accepted or adopted, that such party does not approve of the quality or manner of the defense thereof or that such Shared Contingent Liability was incurred by reason of a settlement rather than by a judgment or other determination of liability (even if, subject to Section 5.6(g) , such settlement was effected without the consent or over the objection of such party).
 
- 45 -
 


      Section 6.4 Payments . Any amount owed in respect of (i) any Shared Contingent Liabilities (including reimbursement for the cost or expense of defense of any Third Party Claim that is a Shared Contingent Liability), or (ii) any Shared Contingent Gains (including reimbursement for the costs or expenses to commence, prosecute or settle matters with respect to a Shared Contingent Gain), pursuant to this Article VI shall be remitted promptly after the party entitled to such amount provides an invoice (including reasonable supporting Information with respect thereto) to the party owing such amount.
 
      Section 6.5 Procedures to Determine Status of Contingent Liability or Contingent Gain .
 
           (a) With respect to any other matters not set forth on Schedules to this Agreement (regardless of whether such matters are currently pending but not set forth on such Schedules or are asserted or filed hereafter), Vishay and VPG will form the Contingent Claim Committee for (x) the purpose of resolving whether:
 
      (i) any claim or right is a Contingent Gain; 
 
      (ii) any Contingent Gain is a Shared Contingent Gain, an Exclusive Vishay Contingent Gain or an Exclusive VPG Contingent Gain;
 
      (iii) any Liability is a Contingent Liability; or 
 
      (iv) any Contingent Liability is a Shared Contingent Liability, an Exclusive Vishay Contingent Liability or an Exclusive VPG Contingent Liability.
 
and (y) for the purpose of determining the Shared VPG Percentage and the Shared Vishay Percentage in connection with Shared Contingent Gains and Shared Contingent Liabilities.
 
           (b) (i) The parties shall refer any Shared Contingent Gain or Shared Contingent Liability to the Contingent Claim Committee to determine the Shared VPG Percentage and the Shared Vishay Percentage in connection with such Shared Contingent Gain or Shared Contingent Liability and (ii) any of the parties may refer any potential Contingent Gains or Contingent Liabilities to the Contingent Claim Committee for resolution as described in Section 6.5(a) (any such request described in clause (i) or clause (ii), a “ Determination Request ”). If the Contingent Claim Committee reaches a determination (which shall be made within thirty (30) days of such referral on a matter submitted to the Contingent Claim Committee by any of the parties), then that determination shall be binding on all of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. In the event that the Contingent Claim Committee cannot reach a determination as to (i) the appropriate allocation of Contingent Gains or Contingent Liabilities between the parties in connection with Shared Contingent Gains or Shared Contingent Liabilities, respectively, or (ii) as to the nature or status of any such Contingent Liabilities or Contingent Gains, within thirty (30) days after such referral, then the issue will be submitted to the respective Senior Party Representative of Vishay and VPG for determination. If the Senior Party Representatives cannot reach a determination, then the procedures set forth in Article VIII of this Agreement shall govern.
 
- 46 -
 


      Section 6.6 Certain Case Allocation Matters . The parties agree that if any Action not set forth on Schedules to this Agreement involves separate and distinct claims that, if not joined in a single Action, would constitute separate Exclusive Contingent Liabilities of two or more parties, they will use their reasonable best efforts to segregate such separate and distinct claims so that the Liabilities associated with each such claim (including all costs and expenses) shall be treated as Exclusive Contingent Liabilities of the appropriate party and so that each party shall have the rights and obligations with respect to each such claim (including pursuant to Article V ) as would have been applicable had such claims been commenced as separate Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, this Section 6.6 shall not apply to any separate and distinct claim that is de minimis or frivolous in nature.
 
ARTICLE VII
 
INSURANCE
 
      Section 7.1 Insurance Matters Generally .
 
           (a) VPG does hereby, for itself and each other member of the VPG Group, agree that no member of the Vishay Group or any Vishay Indemnified Party shall have any liability whatsoever as a result of the insurance policies and practices of Vishay and its Affiliates as in effect at any time prior to the Effective Time, including as a result of the level or scope of any such insurance, the creditworthiness of any insurance carrier, the terms and conditions of any policy, the adequacy or timeliness of any notice to any insurance carrier with respect to any claim or potential claim, the bankruptcy or insolvency of any insurance carrier or otherwise.
 
           (b) The Separated Assets shall include any and all Insurance Policies which are owned or maintained by or on behalf of VPG or any member of the VPG Group or which are owned or maintained by or on behalf of Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group and which relate exclusively to the MGF Business and which are by their terms assignable to VPG or any member of the VPG Group. All other Insurance Policies shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7.2 .
 
      Section 7.2 Shared Insurance Policies .
 
           (a) Vishay agrees to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the interest and rights of VPG and the other members of the VPG Group as of the Effective Time as insureds, additional named insureds or beneficiaries or in any other capacity under occurrence-based Insurance Policies of Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group in respect of periods prior to the Effective Time (and under claims-made policies and programs to the extent a claim has been submitted prior to the Effective Time) to survive the Effective Time for the period for which such interests and rights would have survived without regard to the transactions contemplated hereby to the extent permitted by such Insurance Policies; provided however that Vishay shall be required to maintain tail or extended coverage for the benefit of the VPG Group with respect to certain Insurance Policies in effect prior to the Effective Time as described in Schedule 1.4 and Schedule 2.5(b)(v) . For the avoidance of doubt, except as otherwise provided in Schedule 1.4 or Schedule 2.5(b)(v) , Vishay shall not be required to maintain any tail or extended coverage for the benefit of the VPG Group with respect to Insurance Policies in effect prior to the Effective Time.
 
- 47 -
 


           (b) Following the Effective Time, Vishay, at its sole option, cost and expense, shall continue to administer the Insurance Policies, including on behalf of VPG and the other members of the VPG Group. Vishay’s retention of the administrative responsibilities for the Insurance Policies shall not relieve VPG or any member of the VPG Group submitting any insurance claim of the responsibility to report such claim accurately, completely and in a timely manner or limit the authority of VPG or such other member of the VPG Group to settle any such insurance claim within the limits of the relevant Insurance Policy. Vishay may discharge its administrative responsibilities under this Section 7.2(b) by contracting for the provision of services by one or more independent parties.
 
           (c) If any insurer does not promptly acknowledge insurance coverage in connection with any insured Assumed Liabilities, then, with respect to such insured Assumed Liabilities, VPG, on an as-incurred basis (i) shall advance all amounts expended by Vishay for or with respect to such insured Assumed Liabilities, including all costs and expenses in connection with the defense and settlement and in satisfaction of any judgment incurred, and amounts sufficient to cover any Liabilities required to be paid by Vishay or any member of the Vishay Group, and (ii) shall pay all costs incurred in connection with pursuing and recovering Insurance Proceeds with respect to the insured Assumed Liabilities, but, in the case of each of clauses (i) and (ii) above, only to the extent Vishay is taking action in respect therewith at the request of VPG, which shall be entitled to direct all such defense, settlement and recovery efforts, subject, however to the provisions of Article V. Any Insurance Proceeds received by Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group after the Effective Time under such policies and programs in respect of VPG and the other members of the VPG Group shall be for the benefit of and shall promptly be paid over to VPG and the other members of the VPG Group. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, neither Vishay nor any member of the Vishay Group shall be liable for the satisfaction of any claim by VPG or any member of the VPG Group out of any self-insurance program maintained by a member of the Vishay Group to the extent relating to an Assumed Liability.
 
           (d) Except as otherwise provided in Schedule 1.4 or Schedule 2.5(b)(v) , Vishay and VPG agree that the aggregate amount of any deductible paid shall be borne by the parties in the same proportion as the Insurance Proceeds received by each such party bears to the total Insurance Proceeds received under the applicable Insurance Policy, and any party that has paid more than its allocable share of the deductible shall be entitled to receive from the other party an amount such that each party will only bear its allocable share.
 
           (e) This Agreement is not intended as an attempted assignment of any policy of insurance or as a contract of insurance and shall not be construed to waive any right or remedy of any member of the Vishay Group in respect of any insurance policy or any other contract or policy of insurance.
 
- 48 -
 


           (f) The parties agree to use their reasonable best efforts to cooperate with respect to the insurance matters contemplated by this Agreement. In the event that both parties have insurance claims relating to the same occurrence, the parties shall jointly defend and waive any conflict necessary to the conduct of a joint defense.
 
           (g) Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to restrict any member of the VPG Group from acquiring at its own expense any other insurance policy in respect of any Liabilities or covering any period.
 
      Section 7.3 Insurance for VPG Officers & Directors . Vishay shall use its reasonable best efforts to provide insurance to those individuals who at and immediately following the Effective Time are officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents of VPG and who immediately prior to the Effective Time were insured persons under the current Vishay Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Policy (such individuals, the “ VPG Officers & Directors ”) with material terms and conditions no less favorable to the VPG Officers & Directors than is available to the officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents of Vishay under the Vishay Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Policy in effect at such time, except that such insurance shall exclude coverage for wrongful acts, errors or omissions occurring after the Distribution Date.
 
      Section 7.4 Director and Officer Indemnification . For a period of six (6) years from the Effective Time, the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws of Vishay to the extent providing for indemnification of persons who were officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents immediately prior to the Effective Time shall not be amended in any manner that would adversely affect the rights of persons who at the Effective Time were directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries or agents of any member of the VPG Group, unless such modification shall be required by, and then only to the minimum extent required by, Applicable Law.
 
      Section 7.5 VPG Insurance . Effective as of the Distribution Date, except as expressly provided herein, Vishay shall not be obligated to maintain insurance coverage with respect to the business, affairs, operations, assets or liabilities of the VPG Group, and VPG shall indemnify and hold the Vishay Group harmless from any Liabilities arising by reason of the failure of the VPG Group to maintain such insurance.
 
ARTICLE VIII
 
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
 
      Section 8.1 Agreement to Resolve Disputes . Except as otherwise specifically provided in any Ancillary Agreement, the procedures for discussion, negotiation and dispute resolution set forth in this Article VIII shall apply to all disputes, controversies or claims (whether sounding in contract, tort or otherwise) that may arise out of or relate to or arise under or in connection with this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby (including all actions taken in furtherance of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby on or prior to the date hereof), or the commercial or economic relationship of the parties relating hereto or thereto, between or among any member of the Vishay Group on the one hand and the VPG Group on the other hand. Each party agrees on behalf of itself and each member of its respective Group that the procedures set forth in this Article VIII shall be the sole and exclusive remedy in connection with any dispute, controversy or claim relating to any of the foregoing matters and irrevocably waives any right to commence any Action in or before any Governmental Authority, except as otherwise required by Applicable Law.
 
- 49 -
 


     Section 8.2 Dispute Resolution; Mediation .
 
          (a) Either party may commence the dispute resolution process of this Section 8.2 by giving the other party written notice (a “ Dispute Notice ”) of any controversy, claim or dispute of whatever nature arising out of or relating to or in connection with this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or the breach, termination, enforceability or validity thereof (a “ Dispute ”) which has not been resolved in the normal course of business or as provided in the relevant Ancillary Agreement. The parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve any Dispute by negotiation between executives of each party (“ Senior Party Representatives ”) who have authority to settle the Dispute and, unless discussions between the parties are already at a senior management level, who are at a higher level of management than the Persons who have direct responsibility for the administration of this Agreement or the relevant Ancillary Agreement. Within fifteen (15) days after delivery of the Dispute Notice, the receiving party shall submit to the other a written response (the “ Response ”). The Dispute Notice and the Response shall include (i) a statement setting forth the position of the party giving such notice and a summary of arguments supporting such position and (ii) the name and title of such party’s Senior Party Representative and any other Persons who will accompany the Senior Party Representative at the meeting at which the parties will attempt to settle the Dispute. Within thirty (30) days after the delivery of the Dispute Notice, the Senior Party Representatives of both parties shall meet at a mutually acceptable time and place, and thereafter as often as they reasonably deem necessary, to attempt to resolve the Dispute. The parties shall cooperate in good faith with respect to any reasonable requests for exchanges of Information regarding the Dispute or a Response thereto.
 
          (b) If the Dispute has not been resolved within sixty (60) days after delivery of the Dispute Notice, or if the parties fail to meet within thirty (30) days after delivery of the Dispute Notice as hereinabove provided, the parties shall make a good faith attempt to settle the Dispute by mediation pursuant to the provisions of this Section 8.2 before resorting to arbitration contemplated by Section 8.3 or any other dispute resolution procedure that may be agreed by the parties.
 
          (c) All negotiations, conferences and discussions pursuant to this Section 8.2 shall be confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations. Nothing said or disclosed, nor any document produced, in the course of such negotiations, conferences and discussions that is not otherwise independently discoverable shall be offered or received as evidence or used for impeachment or for any other purpose in any current or future arbitration.
 
          (d) Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be conducted in accordance with the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution Model Procedure for Mediation of Business Disputes in effect on the date of this Agreement by a mediator mutually selected by the parties.
 
- 50 -
 


           (e) Within thirty (30) days after the mediator has been selected as provided above, both parties and their respective attorneys shall meet with the mediator for one (1) mediation session, it being agreed that each party representative attending such mediation session shall be a Senior Party Representative with authority to settle the Dispute. If the Dispute cannot be settled at such mediation session or at any mutually agreed continuation thereof, either party may give the other and the mediator a written notice declaring the mediation process at an end.
 
           (f) Costs of the mediation shall be borne equally by the parties involved in the matter, except that each party shall be responsible for its own expenses.
 
           (g) Any Dispute regarding the following matters is not required to be negotiated or mediated prior to seeking relief from an arbitrator or, if applicable, from a court pursuant to Section 10.14 : (i) breach of any obligation of confidentiality or waiver of Privilege; and (ii) any other claim where interim relief is sought to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one of the parties. However, the parties to the Dispute shall make a good faith effort to negotiate and mediate such Dispute, according to the above procedures, while such arbitration is pending.
 
      Section 8.3 Arbitration .
 
           (a) Subject to Section 8.3(b) , if for any reason a Dispute is not resolved within one hundred eighty (180) days from delivery of the Dispute Notice in accordance with the dispute resolution process described in Section 8.2 , the parties agree that such Dispute shall be settled by binding arbitration before a single arbitrator under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association (“ AAA ”) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pursuant to the Commercial Rules of the AAA. The arbitrator selected to resolve the Dispute shall be bound exclusively by the laws of the State of New York without regard to its choice of law rules. Any decisions of award of the arbitrator will be final and binding upon the parties and may be entered as a judgment by the parties. Any rights to appeal or review such award by any court or tribunal are hereby waived to the extent permitted by Applicable Law.
 
           (b) Costs of the arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties involved in the matter, except that each party shall be responsible for its own expenses, except as otherwise determined by the arbitrator.
 
           (c) The parties agree to comply and cause the members of their applicable Group to comply with any award made in any arbitration proceeding pursuant to this Section 8.3 , and agree to enforcement of or entry of judgment upon such award in any court of competent jurisdiction, including any federal or state court located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania or the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan. The arbitrator shall be entitled to award any remedy in such proceedings, including monetary damages, specific performance and all other forms of legal and equitable relief; provided , however , that the arbitrator shall not be entitled to award punitive, exemplary, treble or any other form of non-compensatory monetary damages unless in connection with indemnification for a Third Party Claim, to the extent of such claim.
 
      Section 8.4 Continuity of Service and Performance . Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the parties will continue to provide service and honor all other commitments under this Agreement and each Ancillary Agreement during the course of dispute resolution pursuant to the provisions of this Article VIII with respect to all matters not subject to such Dispute.
 
- 51 -
 


      Section 8.5 Limitation of Liability . In no event shall any member of the Vishay Group or the VPG Group be liable to any member of the other Group for any special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss of any kind, however caused and on any theory of liability (including negligence) arising in any way out of this Agreement, whether or not such Person has been advised of the possibility of any such damages; provided , however , that the foregoing limitations shall not limit either party’s indemnification obligations for Liabilities with respect to Third Party Claims as set forth in Article V . The provisions of Article V , Article VIII and Section 10.14 shall be the parties’ sole recourse for any breach hereof or any breach of the Ancillary Agreements, except as may be explicitly provided in any Ancillary Agreement.
 
ARTICLE IX
 
TERMINATION
 
      Without limiting the generality of Section 3.5(a) , (i) this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements may be terminated, (ii) the Separation may be abandoned and (iii) the Distribution may be abandoned, in each case at any time prior to the Effective Time by and in the sole and absolute discretion of Vishay without the approval of VPG. In the event of such termination, neither party shall have any Liability of any kind to the other party.
 
ARTICLE X
 
MISCELLANEOUS
 
      Section 10.1 Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered or transmitted by facsimile, e-mail or other electronic means, shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. A facsimile or electronic signature is deemed an original signature for all purposes under this Agreement.
 
      Section 10.2 Entire Agreement . This Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements, and any Annexes, Schedules and Exhibits hereto and thereto, as well as any other agreements and documents referred to herein and therein, constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all previous agreements, negotiations, discussions, understandings, writings, commitments and conversations between the parties with respect to such subject matter. No agreements or understandings exist between the parties other than those set forth or referred to herein or therein.
 
- 52 -
 


      Section 10.3 Construction .
 
           (a) Any uncertainty or ambiguity with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed for or against any party based on attribution of drafting by either party.
 
           (b) The headings contained herein are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. In this Agreement, unless a clear contrary intention appears:
 
      (i) the singular number includes the plural number and vice versa; 
 
      (ii) reference to any Person includes such Person’s successors and assigns but, if applicable, only if such successors and assigns are not prohibited by this Agreement, and reference to a Person in a particular capacity excludes such Person in any other capacity or individually;
 
      (iii) reference to any gender includes each other gender; 
 
      (iv) reference to any agreement, document or instrument means such agreement, document or instrument as amended, modified, supplemented or restated, and in effect from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof subject to compliance with the requirements set forth herein; 
 
      (v) reference to any Applicable Law means such Applicable Law as amended, modified, codified, replaced or reenacted, in whole or in part, and in effect from time to time, including rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and reference to any section or other provision of any Applicable Law means that provision of such Applicable Law from time to time in effect and constituting the substantive amendment, modification, codification, replacement or reenactment of such section or other provision; 
 
      (vi) “herein,” “hereby,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “hereto” and words of similar import shall be deemed references to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular article, section or other provision hereof or thereof; 
 
      (vii) “including” (and with correlative meaning “include”) means including without limiting the generality of any description preceding such term; 
 
      (viii) the Table of Contents and headings are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation hereof or thereof; 
 
      (ix) with respect to the determination of any period of time, “from” means “from and including” and “to” means “to but excluding;” and 
 
      (x) references to documents, instruments or agreements shall be deemed to refer as well to all addenda, exhibits, schedules or amendments thereto.
 
- 53 -
 


      Section 10.4 Assignability . This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, and their respective successors and permitted assigns; provided , however , that no party may assign, delegate or transfer (by merger, operation of law or otherwise) its respective rights or delegate its respective obligations under this Agreement without the express prior written consent of the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any Wholly-owned Subsidiary; provided , however , that each party shall at all times remain liable for the performance of its obligations under this Agreement by any such Wholly-owned Subsidiary. Any attempted assignment or delegation in violation of this Section 10.4 shall be void.
 
      Section 10.5 Third Party Beneficiaries . Except for (x) the indemnification rights under this Agreement of any Vishay Indemnified Party or any VPG Indemnified Party in their respective capacities as such under Article V and for the release under Section 5.1 of any Person provided therein and (y) the rights to insurance of VPG Officers and Directors under Section 7.3 : (i) the provisions of this Agreement are solely for the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns, and are not intended to confer upon any Person, except the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns, any rights or remedies hereunder; (ii) there are no third party beneficiaries of this Agreement; and (iii) this Agreement shall not provide any third party with any remedy, claim, liability, reimbursement, claim of action or other right in excess of those existing without reference to this Agreement.
 
      Section 10.6 Governing Law . This Agreement and the legal relations between the parties shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflict of laws rules thereof to the extent such rules would require the application of the law of another jurisdiction.
 
      Section 10.7 Notices . All notices, demands and other communications required to be given to a Party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if personally delivered, sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, transmitted by facsimile, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) to such Party at the relevant street address or facsimile number set forth below (or at such other street address or facsimile number as such Party may designate from time to time by written notice in accordance with this provision):
 
      If to Vishay, to:
 
      Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
      63 Lancaster Avenue
      Malvern, PA 19355-2120
      Attention: Dr. Lior E. Yahalomi, Chief Financial Officer
      Telephone: 610-644-1300
      Facsimile: 610-889-2161
 
      with a copy to:
 
      Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
      1177 Avenue of the Americas
      New York, NY 10036
     
Attention: Ernest S. Wechsler, Esq.
      Telephone: 212-715-9100
      Facsimile: 212-715-8000
 
- 54 -
 


     If to VPG, to:
 
     Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
     3 Great Valley Parkway
     Malvern, PA 19355-1307
    
Attention: William M. Clancy, Chief Financial Officer
     Telephone: 484-321-5300
     Facsimile: 484-321-5301
 
     with a copy to:
 
     Pepper Hamilton LLP
     3000 Two Logan Square
     Eighteenth and Arch Streets
    
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2799
     Attention: Barry Abelson, Esq.
     Telephone: 215-981-4000
     Facsimile: 215-981-4750
 
Any notice, demand or other communication hereunder shall be deemed given upon the first to occur of: (i) the fifth (5 th ) day after deposit thereof, postage prepaid and addressed correctly, in a receptacle under the control of the United States Postal Service; (ii) transmittal by facsimile transmission to a receiver or other device under the control of the party to whom notice is being given; or (iii) actual delivery to or receipt by the party to whom notice is being given or an employee or agent thereof.
 
     Section 10.8 Severability . If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any Person or circumstance is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof, or the application of such provision to Persons or circumstances or in jurisdictions other than those as to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable, shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby, so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner adverse to any party. Upon such determination, the parties shall negotiate in good faith in an effort to agree upon such a suitable and equitable provision to effect the original intent of the parties.
 
     Section 10.9 Nonrecurring Costs and Expenses . Vishay shall pay for all reasonable documented out-of-pocket fees, costs and expenses incurred by the VPG Group prior to the Effective Time in connection with the Separation and the Distribution.
 
- 55 -
 


     Section 10.10 Press Releases; Public Announcements . Prior to the Distribution Date, Vishay shall be responsible for issuing any press releases or otherwise making public statements with respect to this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements, the Separation, the Distribution or any of the other transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, and VPG shall not make such statements without the prior written consent of Vishay. Prior to the Distribution Date, Vishay and VPG shall each consult with the other prior to making any filings with any Governmental Authority with respect to any of the foregoing, but no such filing shall be made without the approval of Vishay, and Vishay shall be permitted to make any filings as it deems necessary or appropriate. Following the Effective Time, neither party shall issue any release or make any other public announcement concerning this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby without the prior written approval of the other party, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned; provided , however , that either party shall be permitted to make any release or public announcement that in the opinion of its counsel it is required to make by law or the rules of any national securities exchange of which its securities are listed; provided further that it has made efforts that are reasonable in the circumstances to obtain the prior approval of the other party.
 
     Section 10.11 Survival of Covenants . Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, any covenants, representations or warranties contained in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement shall survive the Separation and Distribution and shall remain in full force and effect.
 
     Section 10.12 Waiver of Default .
 
          (a) Any term or provision of this Agreement may be waived, or the time for its performance may be extended, by the party or the parties entitled to the benefit thereof. Any such waiver shall be validly and sufficiently given for the purposes of this Agreement if, as to any party, it is in writing signed by an authorized representative of such party.
 
           (b) Waiver by any party of any default by the other party of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver by the waiving party of any subsequent or other default, nor shall it in any way affect the validity of this Agreement or any party hereof or prejudice the rights of the other party thereafter to enforce each and ever such provision. No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege.
 
     Section 10.13 Amendments . This Agreement may be amended, supplemented, modified or abandoned at any time prior to the Distribution Date by and in the sole and absolute discretion of Vishay without the approval of VPG or of the stockholders of Vishay. After the Effective Time, no provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed amended, modified or supplemented by any party, unless such amendment, supplement or modification is in writing and signed by the authorized representative of the party against whom it is sought to enforce such amendment, supplement or modification.
 
- 56 -
 


      Section 10.14 Specific Performance . The parties agree that the remedy at law for any breach of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement may be inadequate, and that, as between Vishay and VPG, any party by whom this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement is enforceable shall be entitled to seek temporary, preliminary or permanent injunctive or other equitable relief with respect to the specific enforcement or performance of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement. Such party may, in its sole discretion, apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for such injunctive or other equitable relief as such court may deem just and proper in order to enforce this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement as between Vishay and VPG, or the members of their respective Groups, or prevent any violation hereof, and, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, as between Vishay and VPG, each party waives any objection to the imposition of such relief.
 
      Section 10.15 Consent to Jurisdiction . Subject to the provisions of Article VIII , each of the parties irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan for the purposes of any suit, Action or other proceeding to compel arbitration, for the enforcement of any arbitration award or for specific performance or other equitable relief pursuant to Section 10.14 . Each of the parties further agrees that service of process, summons or other document by U.S. registered mail to such parties address as provided in Section 10.7 shall be effective service of process for any Action, suit or other proceeding with respect to any matters for which it has submitted to jurisdiction pursuant to this Section 10.15 . Each of the parties irrevocably waives any objection to venue in the federal and state courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan of any Action, suit or proceeding arising out of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby for which it has submitted to jurisdiction pursuant to this Section 10.15 , and waives any claim that any such Action, suit or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.
 
      Section 10.16 Waiver of jury trial . Subject to Article VIII , each of the parties hereby waives to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law any right it may have to a trial by jury with respect to any court proceeding directly or indirectly arising out of and permitted under or in connection with this agreement or the transactions contemplated by this agreement. Each of the parties hereby (a) certifies that no representative, agent or attorney of any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of litigation, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver and (b) acknowledges that it has been induced to enter into this agreement and the transactions contemplated by this agreement, as applicable, by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 10.16 .
 
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 
- 57 -
 


      WHEREFORE , the parties have signed this Separation Agreement effective as of the date first set forth above.
 
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
/s/ Lior E. Yahalomi
Name: Dr. Lior E. Yahalomi
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer 
 
   
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
 
/s/ William M. Clancy
Name: William M. Clancy
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer



MASTER SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
 
between
 
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
and
 
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
 
DATED JUNE 22, 2010
 
 
 
ANNEX A
 
 
 
 
 
- 2 -
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
 
Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
(In thousands)
 
April 3,
2010
(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
       Cash and cash equivalents $ 73,121  
       Accounts receivable, net 25,212
       Net inventories 45,010
       Deferred income taxes 4,984
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets 5,333
Total current assets 153,660
 
Property and equipment, net 44,236
Intangible assets, net 16,244
Other assets 8,440
Total assets $ 222,580
   
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
       Notes payable to banks $ -
       Trade accounts payable 6,942
       Payroll and related expenses 7,082
       Other accrued expenses 6,119
       Income taxes 1,286
       Current portion of long-term debt 96
Total current liabilities 21,525
 
Long-term debt, less current portion 14,525
Deferred income taxes 5,985
Other liabilities 6,347
Accrued pension and other postretirement costs 10,442
Total liabilities 58,824
 
Equity:
Common stock 1,230
Class B common stock 100
Paid in capital in excess of par 174,523
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (12,231 )
Total stockholders’ equity 163,622
Noncontrolling interests 134
Total equity 163,756
Total liabilities and equity $ 222,580  

- 3 -
 


MASTER SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
 
between
 
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
and
 
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
 
DATED JUNE 22, 2010
 
SCHEDULES
 
Terms used but not defined in these Schedules shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “Master Separation Agreement”).
 
1
 


Schedule 1.1
Capital Allocation Transactions
 
Prior to the Separation, the parties will cause the following transactions to occur:
 
      1.       All intercompany accounts for money borrowed and non-trade invoicing between Vishay or any other member of the Vishay Group, on the one hand, and VPG or any other member of the VPG Group, on the other, will be settled and eliminated.
 
2. The extinguishment of notes payable obligations running from members of the VPG Group to members of the Vishay Group will be effected through distribution and contribution transactions of cash and the notes.
 
3. Vishay will cause the VPG to have Actual VPG Net Cash as of the Distribution Date equal between $58,500,000 and $71,500,000. To the extent Actual VPG Net Cash is less than or exceeds these values, the parties will make an adjustment in accordance with the terms of Section 2.17 of the Master Separation Agreement.
 
4. VPG will enter into a credit facility.
 
The foregoing transaction list is qualified by reference to the description of the separation transactions in the Private Letter Ruling Request, dated June 11, 2010, as amended from time to time prior to the Separation, submitted by Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. to the Internal Revenue Service (the “ Private Letter Ruling Request ”). In the case of any inconsistency between this Schedule and the Private Letter Ruling Request, this Schedule shall be deemed amended to conform to the description of the separation transactions as set forth in the Private Letter Ruling Request.
 
2
 


Schedule 1.2
Exclusive VPG Contingent Liabilities
 
For the avoidance of doubt, this schedule is not necessarily exhaustive of all litigation relating to the MGF Business.
 
Lawsuits

Tawfik v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.

McMahon v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
 
Environmental Matters
 
Wondra v. BLH Electronics
 
Tak and Binh Chan v. Vishay Measurements Group et al
 
Sutton Brook Site (Vishay BLH, MA)
 
Product Liability
 
Esteve SA (Rians, France)
 
Open VPG Claims
 
Date of Claim
Name of Employee       Incident       Number       Status       Entity
7.        [Employee name omitted] 28.11.2003 10604063401 open   Tedea International Ltd
8.   [Employee name omitted] 09.01.2006 10607050390 open V.I.E.C. Ltd.
9.   [Employee name omitted]   28.05.2007 10607031117 open V.I.E.C. Ltd.
10.   [Employee name omitted] 13.06.2007 10607036036 open V.I.E.C. Ltd.
11.   [Employee name omitted] 04.11.2007 10607065396 open Vishay Israel Limited
12.   [Employee name omitted] 17.12.2002 10609050909 open Vishay Israel Limited

3
 


Schedule 1.3
Separation Transactions
 
The separation transactions shall be as specified in the Private Letter Ruling Request. In the case of any inconsistency between this Schedule and the Private Letter Ruling Request, this Schedule shall be deemed amended to conform to the description of the separation transactions as set forth in the Private letter Ruling Request.
 
The parties will cause the following miscellaneous asset transfers to occur:
 
      1.       Acquisition of intellectual property owned by Vishay S.A. and necessary for manufacturing strain gage products to Vishay Measurements Group, Inc.
 
2. Acquisition of intellectual property owned by Vishay S.A. and necessary for manufacturing foil resistor chips for Vishay Precision Foil GmbH.
 
3. Transfer of other intellectual property as set forth in the attachment hereto.
 
4
 


Attachment to Schedule 1.3 to Master Separation Agreement
Transferred Intellectual Property
 
COUNTRY OF
PATENT # TITLE REGISTRATION VPG ASSIGNEE
7576622 (US4176445A) Metal foil resistor United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
4,176,445 Metal foil resistor United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
4,297,670 Metal foil resistor United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
4,306,217 Flat electrical components United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
2926516 German patent Germany Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
1 143 810 Metal foil resistor Canada Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Application Circuit compensation in strain gage
61/229,123 based transducers United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Foil strain gage for automated handling
US 7,150,199 B2 and packaging United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Foil strain gage for automated handling
WO 2006/041577 A1 and packaging PCT Worldwide Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Electrical resistors and methods of
5,206,623 making same United States Vishay Precision Group, Inc.

CURRENT
RENEWAL TRADEMARK
TRADEMARK COUNTRY STATUS DATE OWNER VPG ASSIGNEE
Vishay
BULK METAL EUROPEAN UNION REGISTERED 14-Feb-11 Intertechnology, Inc. Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Vishay
BULK METAL FRANCE REGISTERED 26-Jun-12 Intertechnology, Inc. Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Vishay
BULK METAL UNITED STATES REGISTERED 19-Dec-12 Intertechnology, Inc. Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Vishay Techno
MULTIDIAL UNITED STATES REGISTERED 23-May-11 Components LLC Vishay Precision Group, Inc.

1
 


Schedule 1.4
Shared Contingent Liabilities
 
Product Liability
 
Product liability refers to third party liability from bodily injury and/or property damage caused by faulty products. With respect to products manufactured in all jurisdictions other than the United States and sold prior to the Separation, it also includes other third party financial loss and the cost of dismantling and refitting any other products manufactured with the faulty product, but does not include the cost of product recall. With respect to products sold in the United States, it includes other third party financial loss only to extent covered by the Errors and Omission (E&O) Insurance Policy of the Vishay Group.
 
The Vishay Group will be responsible for product liability in respect of any product manufactured by the VPG Group outside the United States and sold prior to the Separation, whether a claim is made with respect thereto before or after the Separation, to the extent of available insurance coverage of the Vishay Group.
 
The Vishay Group will be responsible for product liability in respect of any product sold by the VPG Group prior to the Separation inside the United States, but only for which a claim has been made with respect thereto before the Separation, to the extent of available insurance coverage of the Vishay Group; provided that to the extent the liability is covered under the Errors & Omission (E&O) Insurance Policy of the Vishay Group, Vishay will be responsible for the liability whether a claim is made with respect thereto before or after the Separation.
 
The following shall govern deductible amounts under any insurance policies of the Vishay Group for which coverage is sought under the circumstances recited in the two preceding paragraphs. Any deductible for which a liability has been accrued on the books and records of the VPG Group prior to the Separation will be the sole responsibility of the VPG Group. Any policy deductible for which a liability has not been accrued on the books and records of the VPG Group prior to the Separation will be shared equally by the Vishay Group and the VPG Group.
 
Vishay agrees to (i) obtain tail coverage for a period of five years under the E&O Policy of Vishay (as in effect on the date the Agreement), to the extent it affords coverage for third party loss on account of products manufactured and sold by the VPG Group prior to the Separation; and (ii) purchase or self-insure extended reporting coverage for a period of five years for product liability relating to products of the VPG Group manufactured and sold prior to the Separation, which coverage shall be substantially the same (including deductible amounts and policy limits) as the coverage afforded under the existing policy of Vishay with HDI-Gerling (as in effect on the date the Agreement), but only in respect of products manufactured outside the United States.
 
1
 


Product Recall Liability
 
Product Recall Liability refers to third party expenses arising in connection with the recall of a faulty product to prevent bodily injury or property damage.
 
The Vishay Group will be responsible for product recall liability in respect of any product manufactured by the VPG Group outside the United States and sold prior to the Separation, whether a claim is made with respect thereto before or after the Separation, to the extent of available insurance coverage of the Vishay Group.
 
The following shall govern deductible amounts under any insurance policies of the Vishay Group for which coverage is sought under the circumstances recited in the preceding paragraph. Any deductible for which a liability has been accrued on the books and records of the VPG Group prior to the Separation will be the sole responsibility of the VPG Group. Any policy deductible for which a liability has not been accrued on the books and records of the VPG Group prior to the Separation will be shared equally by the Vishay Group and the VPG Group.
 
Vishay agrees to purchase or self-insure extended reporting coverage for a period of five years for product recall liability relating to products of the VPG Group manufactured and sold prior to the Separation, which coverage shall be substantially the same (including deductible amounts and policy limits) as the coverage afforded under the existing policy of Vishay with Gerling Insurance (as in effect on the date the Agreement), but only in respect of products manufactured outside the United States.
 
Liabilities Relating to the Separation
 
Liabilities relating to the Separation based upon a claim or other assertion that the Separation violated the rights of any Person or constituted a breach of a duty owed by any Person to the stockholders of Vishay or VPG shall be borne by the Vishay Group and the VPG Group as follows:
 
      (i)       if covered by an insurance policy of the Vishay Group or an insurance policy of the VPG Group, by the Vishay Group or the VPG Group, as the case may be, but only to the extent of the insurance proceeds;
 
(ii) each party shall be responsible for the policy deductible under its insurance policy referred to in clause (i); and
 
(iii) otherwise in the proportion of the Vishay Group 90% and the VPG Group 10%.
 
2
 


Schedule 2.4(a)(iii)
Subsidiaries of VPG
 
Company Name Country
Vishay - PM Belgium N.V. Belgium
Vishay - Waste Collection Systems Belgium N.V. Belgium
High Goals Investments Limited British Virgin Islands
Vishay Tedea-Huntleigh (Beijing) Electronics Co., Ltd China
Vishay Precision Measurement Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China
Vishay Celtron Technologies (Tianjin) Co., Ltd China
Pharos de Costa Rica, S.A. Costa Rica
Vishay PME France SARL France
SCI Vijafranc France
Vishay Measurements Group France, S.A.S. France
Vishay Precision Foil GmbH Germany
Vishay Measurement Group GmbH Germany
Powertron GmbH Germany
MDT Technik GmbH Germany
Vishay Transducers India Limited India
Vishay Precision Transducers India Private Limited India
Vishay PM Onboard (Ireland) Limited Ireland
Vishay Precision Israel Ltd. Israel
Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd. Israel
Tedea-Huntleigh International, Ltd. Israel
T-H Industrial Properties, Ltd. Israel
T-H Technology, Ltd. Israel
Alpha Electronics Corp. Japan
Vishay Precision Foil K.K. Japan
Vishay Precision Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Vishay - Waste Collection Systems B.V. Netherlands
Tedea Huntleigh B.V. Netherlands
Vishay Revere Transducers Europe B.V. Netherlands
Vishay Nobel AS Norway
Vishay Precision Asia Investments Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Vishay Precision España S.L. Spain
Vishay Nobel AB Sweden
AB Givareteknik Sweden
Vishay Celtron Technologies, Inc. Taiwan
Vishay Measurements Group UK Limited United Kingdom
Vishay PM Group Limited United Kingdom
Vishay PM Onboard Limited United Kingdom
Tedea-Huntleigh Europe Ltd. United Kingdom
Selectaid Limited United Kingdom
Meadowgrip Limited United Kingdom
Fleet Weighing Limited United Kingdom
PM Electronics Limited United Kingdom
Waste Collection Systems Limited United Kingdom
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. United States
Vishay Measurements Group, Inc. United States
Vishay Transducers Ltd. United States
Vishay Precision Foil, Inc. United States
Vishay BLH, Inc. United States
Tedea-Huntleigh, Inc. United States

3
 


Schedule 2.4(b)(i)
Excluded Assets
 
      1.       All assets used exclusively by Vishay S.A. in its strain gage business other than intellectual property.
 
2. All assets used exclusively by Vishay S.A. in finishing RCK foil resistor products, other than the intellectual property and equipment transferred to Vishay Advanced Technologies Ltd. (see Schedule 1.3).
 
5
 


Schedule 2.5(b)(ii)
Excluded Assumed Liabilities
 
Excluded Assumed Liabilities other than Excluded Assumed Environmental Liabilities set forth on Schedule 2.5(b)(v).
 
      1.       Any Liabilities arising from or related to Nippon Vishay, K.K. to the extent arising from occurrences prior to the Distribution.
 
6
 


Schedule 2.5(b)(v)
Excluded Assumed Environmental Liabilities
 
Other than the Environmental Liabilities set forth on Schedule 1.2 to be assumed by VPG, the Vishay Group will be responsible for Environmental Liabilities in respect of the manufacturing locations of the VPG Group in existence at or prior to the Separation in the United States, Germany, India and Israel attributable to, and to the extent of, conditions in existence at or prior to the Separation, whether a claim is made with respect thereto before or after the Separation, to the extent of available insurance coverage of the Vishay Group.
 
Other than the Environmental Liabilities set forth on Schedule 1.2 to be assumed by VPG, the Vishay Group will be responsible for Environmental Liabilities in respect of the manufacturing locations of the VPG Group in existence at or prior to the Separation in all other jurisdictions attributable to, and to the extent of, conditions in existence at or prior to the Separation, whether a claim is made with respect thereto before or after the Separation, to the extent of available insurance coverage of the Vishay Group, but only if the environmental conditions giving rise to the Environmental Liabilities were openly manifest and apparent prior to the Separation.
 
The following shall govern deductible amounts under any insurance policies of the Vishay Group for which coverage is sought under the circumstances recited in the two preceding paragraphs. Any deductible for which a liability has been accrued on the books and records of the VPG Group prior to the Separation will be the sole responsibility of the VPG Group. Any policy deductible for which a liability has not been accrued on the books and records of the VPG Group prior to the Separation will be shared equally by the Vishay Group and the VPG Group.
 
Vishay agrees to list as “discontinued locations” (i) for a period of five years for VPG manufacturing locations in the United States, India and Israel in existence at or prior to the Separation and (ii) for a period of three years for VPG manufacturing locations located in Germany in existence at or prior to the Separation, in the insurance policies of Vishay providing coverage for Environmental Liabilities in those jurisdictions, but only in respect of Liabilities attributable to, and to the extent of, environmental conditions in existence at or prior to the Separation.
 
7
 


Schedule 2.16
VPG Assets to be Transferred to Vishay
 
      1.       Research & development facility and warehouse historically owned by Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd. (to be transferred to Vishay Israel Limited).
 
2. The Dale Surface Mount Resistor “ASL” production line will be sold from Alpha Electronics Corp. to Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc.
 
8
 


Schedule 3.3(b)
Vishay Group Resignations
 
Effective as of the time of Separation, Mr. Ziv Shoshani will resign as an executive officer of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., but will remain a director on Vishay Intertechnology Inc.’s board of directors.
 
9
 


Schedule 3.4(b)
VPG Group Resignations
 
Effective as of the time of the Separation, Dr. Lior Yahalomi and Mr. William Clancy will resign as directors of VPG.
 
10
 


Portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the Secretary of the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to an application for confidential treatment
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such portions are marked by [***].
 
Exhibit 10.16
 
 
 
MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT
 
 
by and between
 
 
Vishay S.A.,
 
a ______________,
 
as Manufacturer
 
 
and
 
Vishay Precision Foil GmbH,
 
a _____________________,
 
 
as Buyer
 
 
 
Dated as of _________, 2010
 


     This MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT (this “ Agreement ”) is made as of _____________ , 2010 by and between Vishay S.A., a _____________ (“ Manufacturer ”), and Vishay Precision Foil GmbH, a _____________ (“ Buyer ”). Manufacturer and Buyer each may be referred to herein as a “ Party ” and collectively, as the “ Parties ”.
 
      WHEREAS, subject to the terms, conditions, commitments and undertakings herein provided, Manufacturer is willing to manufacture those products as set forth on Exhibit A hereto (as the same may be modified from time to time pursuant to the provisions hereof, the “ Products ”) on a contract basis on behalf of Buyer in such quantities as Buyer shall request , as provided in this Agreement;
 
      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
 
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
 
      For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings specified in this Article I:
 
      Affiliate ” means, as applied to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with that Person as of the date on which or at any time during the period for when such determination is being made. For purposes of this definition, “ control ” means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities or other interests, by contract or otherwise, and the terms “ controlling ” and “ controlled ” have meanings correlative to the foregoing.
 
      Applicable Law ” means any applicable law, statute, rule or regulation of any Governmental Authority, or any outstanding order, judgment, injunction, ruling or decree by any Governmental Authority.
 
      Buyer ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Confidential Information ” means all proprietary, design or operational information, data or material including, without limitation: (a) specifications, ideas and concepts for goods and services; (b) manufacturing specifications and procedures; (c) design drawings and models; (d) materials and material specifications; (e) quality assurance policies, procedures and specifications; (f) customer, client, manufacturer and supplier information; (g) computer software and derivatives thereof relating to design development or manufacture of goods; (h) training materials and information; (i) inventions, devices, new developments, methods and processes, whether patentable or unpatentable and whether or not reduced to practice; (j) all other know-how, methodology, procedures, techniques and Trade Secrets; (k) proprietary earnings reports and forecasts; (l) proprietary macro-economic reports and forecasts; (m) proprietary marketing, advertising and business plans, objectives and strategies; (n) proprietary general market evaluations and surveys; (o) proprietary financing and credit- related information; (p) other copyrightable or patented works; (q) the terms of this Agreement; and (r) all similar and related information in whatever form; in each case, of one party which has been disclosed by Manufacturer or members of its Group on the one hand, or Buyer or members of its Group, on the other hand, in written, oral (including by recording), electronic, or visual form to, or otherwise has come into the possession of, the other Group.
 


      DDU ” has the meaning and usage assigned to such words in the Incoterms rules published by the International Chamber of Commerce.
 
      Ex Works ” has the meaning and usage assigned to such words in the Incoterms rules published by the International Chamber of Commerce.
 
      Firm Order ” means Buyer’s non-cancelable purchase order for Products to be purchased by Buyer from Manufacturer pursuant to this Agreement for delivery.
 
      Forecast ” means, with respect to any relevant period, a good faith non-binding forecast, based on information available to Buyer at the time of such forecast (which information, if reduced to writing, shall be made available to Manufacturer upon reasonable request), of the Firm Order for each Product that Buyer expects to deliver to Manufacturer for each calendar month during such period.
 
      Governmental Authority ” means any U.S. or non-U.S. federal, state, local, foreign or international court, arbitration or mediation tribunal, government, department, commission, board, bureau, agency, official or other regulatory, administrative or governmental authority.
 
      Group ” means, with respect to any Person, each Subsidiary of such Person and each other Person that is controlled directly or indirectly by such Person.
 
      Intellectual Property ” means all domestic and foreign patents and patent applications, together with any continuations, continuations-in-part or divisional applications thereof, and all patents issuing thereon (including reissues, renewals and re-examinations of the foregoing); design patents; invention disclosures; mask works; all domestic and foreign copyrights, whether or not registered, together with all copyright applications and registrations therefor; all domain names, together with any registrations therefor and any goodwill relating thereto; all domestic and foreign trademarks, service marks, trade names, and trade dress, in each case together with any applications and registrations therefor and all goodwill relating thereto; all Trade Secrets, commercial and technical information, know-how, proprietary or Confidential Information, including engineering, production and other designs, notebooks, processes, drawings, specifications, formulae, and technology; computer and electronic data processing programs and software (object and source code), data bases and documentation thereof; all inventions (whether or not patented); all utility models; all registered designs, certificates of invention and all other intellectual property under the laws of any country throughout the world.
 
      Last-Time Buy Order ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6 .
 


      Liability ” means, with respect to any Person, any and all losses, claims, charges, debts, demands, Actions, causes of action, suits, damages, obligations, payments, costs and expenses, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, specialties, indemnities and similar obligations, exoneration covenants, obligations under contracts, guarantees, make whole agreements and similar obligations, and other liabilities and requirements, including all contractual obligations, whether absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, known or unknown, joint or several, whenever arising, and including those arising under any Applicable Law, action, threatened or contemplated action (including the costs and expenses of demands, assessments, judgments, settlements and compromises relating thereto and attorneys’ fees and any and all costs and expenses, whatsoever reasonably incurred in investigating, preparing or defending against any such actions or threatened or contemplated actions) or order of any Governmental Authority or any award of any arbitrator or mediator of any kind, and those arising under any contract, in each case, whether or not recorded or reflected or otherwise disclosed or required to be recorded or reflected or otherwise disclosed, on the books and records or financial statements of any Person, including any Liability for taxes.
 
      Manufacturer ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Manufacturer’s Other Manufacturing Obligations ” means the manufacturing obligations and commitments of Manufacturer to Persons other than Buyer, including Manufacturer’s Affiliates.
 
      Person ” (whether or not initially capitalized) means any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, firm, joint venture, entity, natural person, trust, estate, unincorporated organization, association, enterprise, government or political subdivision thereof, or Governmental Authority.
 
      Product ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Product Warranty ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.1(a) .
 
      Raw Materials Cost ” means the direct cost of material used in a finished Product, including the normal quantity of material wasted in the production process, purchasing costs, inbound freight charges and any applicable subcontractor charges.
 
      Subsidiary ” of any Person means a corporation or other organization whether incorporated or unincorporated of which at least a majority of the securities or interests having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to elect at least a majority of the board of directors or others performing similar functions with respect to such corporation or other organization is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person or by any one or more of its Subsidiaries, or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries; provided , however , that no Person that is not directly or indirectly wholly-owned by any other Person shall be a Subsidiary of such other Person unless such other Person controls, or has the right, power or ability to control, that Person.
 
      Specifications ” means, with respect to any Product, the design, composition, dimensions, other physical characteristics, chemical characteristics, packaging, unit count and trade dress of such Product.
 
      Term ” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.1 .
 


      Trade Secrets ” means information, including a formula, program, device, method, technique, process or other Confidential Information that derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other Persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use and is the subject of efforts that are reasonable, under the circumstances, to maintain its secrecy.
 
      Wholly-Owned Subsidiary ” of a Person means a Subsidiary of that Person substantially all of whose voting securities and outstanding equity interest are owned either directly or indirectly by such Person or one or more of its Subsidiaries or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries.
 
      The terms “ herein ”, “ hereof ”, “ hereunder ” and like terms, unless otherwise specified, shall be deemed to refer to this Agreement in its entirety and shall not be limited to any particular section or provision hereof. The term “ including ” as used herein shall be deemed to mean “including, but not limited to.” The term “ days ” shall refer to calendar days unless specified otherwise. References herein to “ Articles ”, “ Sections ” and “ Exhibits ” shall be deemed to mean Articles, Sections of and Exhibits to this Agreement unless otherwise specified.
 
ARTICLE II
PURCHASE AND SALE OF PRODUCTS
 
      SECTION 2.1 Agreement to Purchase and Sell Products . (a) During the Term, Manufacturer hereby agrees to manufacture and supply on behalf of Buyer, and Buyer hereby agrees to purchase and accept from Manufacturer, such amounts of Products, as from time to time shall be ordered by Buyer.
 
      (b) All Products to be sold to Buyer pursuant to this Agreement shall be manufactured by Manufacturer or an Affiliate of Manufacturer.
 
      SECTION 2.2 Raw Materials . Manufacturer shall be responsible for the procurement of raw materials and container and packaging materials, in each case consistent with the Manufacturer’s customary practices and necessary to manufacture and package the Products, except that Buyer acknowledges that Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd. (“ VAT ”), or an Affiliate of Buyer, shall supply foil resistor chips on the terms described in the Supply Agreement between the Manufacturer, as buyer, and VAT, as supplier, as may be amended or supplemented from time to time (the “ Supply Agreement ”).
 
      SECTION 2.3 Product Specifications . (a) Manufacturer shall manufacture all Products according to the Specifications in effect as of the date of this Agreement, with such changes or additions to the Specifications of the Products related thereto as shall be requested by Buyer in accordance with this Section or as otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties, so long as and only to the extent that if such requested change or addition requires a change or addition in the Specifications applicable to the foil resistor chips to be supplied by VAT under the Supply Agreement, VAT can supply the foil resistor chips with such change or addition or Buyer is able to identify an appropriate alternative source of foil resistor chips in the event that VAT is unable to provide such chips. All other Products shall be manufactured with such Specifications as the Parties shall agree in writing.
 


      (b) Buyer may request changed or additional Specifications for any Product by delivering written notice thereof to Manufacturer not less than one hundred twenty (120) days in advance of the first Firm Order for such Product to be supplied with such changed or additional Specifications. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if additional advance time would reasonably be required in order to implement the manufacturing processes for production of a Product with any changed or additional Specifications, and to commence manufacture and delivery thereof, Manufacturer shall so notify Buyer, and Manufacturer shall not be required to commence delivery of such Product until the passage of such additional time.
 
      (c) Manufacturer shall be required to accommodate any change of, or additions to, the Specifications for any Product, if and only if (i) in Manufacturer’s good faith judgment, such changed or additional Specifications would not require Manufacturer to violate good manufacturing practice, (ii) the representation and warranty of Buyer deemed made pursuant to Subsection (e) below is true and correct, (iii) Buyer agrees to reimburse Manufacturer for the incremental costs and expenses incurred by Manufacturer in accommodating the changed or additional Specifications, including the costs of acquiring any new machinery and tooling, and (iv) to the extent applicable, a corresponding change of, or addition to, the Specifications applicable to the materials supplied to the Manufacturer under the Supply Agreement has been made. For the avoidance of doubt, such costs and expenses shall be payable by Buyer separately from the cost of Products at such time or times as Manufacturer shall request
 
      (d) Manufacturer shall notify Buyer in writing within thirty (30) days of its receipt of any request for changed or additional Specifications (i) whether Manufacturer will honor such changed or additional Specifications, (ii) if Manufacturer declines to honor such changed or additional Specifications, the basis therefor and (iii) if applicable, the estimated costs and expenses that Buyer will be required to reimburse Manufacturer in respect of the requested changes or additions, as provided in Subsection (c) above. Buyer shall notify Manufacturer in writing within fifteen (15) days after receiving notice of any required reimbursement whether Buyer agrees to assume such reimbursement obligation.
 
      (e) By its request for any changed or additional Specifications for any Product, Buyer shall be deemed to represent and warrant to Manufacturer that the manufacture and sale of the Product incorporating Buyer’s changed or additional Specifications, as a result of such incorporation, will not and could not reasonably be expected to (i) violate or conflict with any contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding to which Buyer and/or any of its Affiliates is a party, including this Agreement and any other contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding with Manufacturer and/or its Affiliates, (ii) infringe on any trademark, service mark, copyright, patent, trade secret or other intellectual property rights of any Person, or (iii) violate any Applicable Law. Buyer shall indemnify and hold Manufacturer and its Affiliates harmless (including with respect to reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements) from any breach of this representation and warranty.
 
      SECTION 2.4 Manufacturer’s Supply Obligations . Manufacturer shall be obligated to manufacture and sell Products to Buyer, in accordance with Buyer’s Firm Orders, to the extent of Manufacturer’s then existing manufacturing capacity, taking into account Manufacturer’s Other Manufacturing Obligations; provided , however , the Manufacturer shall give equal priority to the orders of Buyer, on the one hand, and Manufacturer’s Other Manufacturing Obligations, on the other.
 


      SECTION 2.5 Product Changes . Manufacturer shall communicate any change in the Specifications for any Product or its manufacture in accordance with Manufacturer’s product change notification process. Buyer shall be deemed to have accepted such change unless, within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from Manufacturer, Buyer informs Manufacturer that such change is not acceptable. If Buyer informs Manufacturer that such change is not acceptable, Manufacturer may by notice to Buyer either (x) continue to supply the Product in accordance with the original Specifications and manufacturing procedures or (y) terminate this Agreement with respect to such Product on a date specified by Manufacturer in a notice of termination, which date shall not be earlier than the earlier of one (1) year from the date of Buyer’s information that it does not accept the change proposed by Manufacturer, subject to the right of the Buyer to submit a Last-Time Buy Order in accordance with Section 4.5 .
 
      SECTION 2.6 Product Discontinuation .
 
      (a) Discontinuation of Products . At any time, Manufacturer may notify Buyer that Manufacturer is discontinuing the manufacture and sale of a Product. Such discontinuation shall take effect on a date specified by Manufacturer in a notice of discontinuation, which date shall not be earlier than one (1) year from the date of the notice of discontinuation; subject to the right of the Buyer to submit a Last-Time Buy Order in accordance with Section 4.5 .
 
      (b) Discontinuation of Foil Chips Under Supply Agreement . To the extent that a discontinuation by VAT under Section 2.5 of the Supply Agreement causes Manufacturer to be unable to satisfy its obligations under this Agreement, Manufacturer shall be released from any claims of breach of this Agreement or the Supply Agreement; provided , that Manufacturer will give Buyer a reasonable opportunity to find alternative sources of foil resistor chips.
 
      SECTION 2.7 Consultation and Support . At either Party’s reasonable request, the Parties shall meet and discuss the nature, quality and level of supply services contemplated by this Agreement. In addition, Manufacturer will make available on a commercially reasonable basis and at commercially reasonable times qualified personnel to provide knowledgeable support service with respect to the Products. The Parties shall negotiate in good faith with respect to any fees and other charges incurred by Manufacturer in providing other than routine product support.
 
ARTICLE III
FORECASTS
 
      SECTION 3.1 Forecasts . As and where warranted, Buyer shall provide to Manufacturer a Forecast of the Firm Orders Buyer expects in good faith to deliver to Manufacturer for such period of time specified in such Forecast. Manufacturer shall use such Forecasts for capacity and raw material planning purposes only and such Forecasts shall not constitute a commitment of any type by Buyer to purchase the Products.
 


ARTICLE IV
ORDERS AND PAYMENT
 
      SECTION 4.1 Purchase Orders . (a) Buyer may place a Firm Order for the Products with Manufacturer at any time and from time to time.
 
      (b) Each Firm Order shall specify (i) number of units of the Product to be purchased and (ii) the requested delivery date, provided that Buyer shall request a delivery date with a lead delivery time that is customary for the particular Product, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. Manufacturer agrees to provide Buyer prompt notice if it knows it cannot meet a requested delivery date.
 
      (c) If Buyer requires a Product on an emergency basis and so informs Manufacturer, and Manufacturer has the Product available in its uncommitted inventory, Manufacturer agrees to use reasonable commercial efforts to fill the emergency order as promptly as practicable. Buyer agrees to pay reasonable incremental expenses related to any emergency order.
 
      SECTION 4.2 Shipment .
 
      (a) Products intended for customers within Europe will be shipped DDU destination Manufacturer’s customers. Products intended for customers outside of Europe will be shipped Ex Works Manufacturer’s factory.
 
      (b) Manufacturer shall package all Products so as to protect them from loss or damage during shipment, in conformity with good commercial practice, the Specifications and Applicable Law. Buyer shall be responsible, at its own cost and expense, for the shipment (including, among other fees, costs and expenses, transit and casualty insurance and third party fees) of all processed materials by Buyer. Manufacturer shall cooperate with Buyer in assembling and coordinating shipments, as reasonably requested by Buyer.
 
      (c) For the avoidance of doubt, title to and risk of loss or damage will pass to Buyer upon Buyer’s pick up for transfer of the Products ordered.
 
      SECTION 4.3 Prices . Pricing for the Products shall be as set forth on Exhibit A , as such Exhibit may be modified from time to time by agreement of the Parties, which shall at all times equal the prices charged by Buyer to its customers for its Products, less a 5% discount. If Buyer proposes to change the prices for Products charged to its customers for any calendar year, the parties will discuss the consequences of such change for the pricing of the Products under this Agreement, including the annual adjustment, and shall agree in good faith to make such change as shall preserve the intended economic benefits of this Agreement to each of the Parties.
 
      SECTION 4.4 Payment Terms .
 
      (a) Unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties in writing, Buyer shall make payment separately for each Firm Order. Buyer shall pay the net amount of all invoice amounts within sixty (60) days of the date of Manufacturer’s invoice unless the terms of Manufacturer’s invoice permits later payment or allows for prepayment with a discount. Invoices shall not be sent earlier than the date on which the Products related thereto are delivered to Buyer.
 


      (b) The Parties hereby agree that Manufacturer shall be entitled to realize a Gross Profit (as defined below) with respect to the Products invoiced during each calendar year equal to 25% of the aggregate Operational Cost of such Products during such calendar year (the “ 25% Markup ”). If the actual aggregate Gross Profit for the Products invoiced during any calendar year is less than 25% of the aggregate Operational Cost for such Products, Buyer will pay to Manufacturer an amount equal to the difference between (x) the aggregate Operational Cost for such Products multiplied by 25% and (y) the actual aggregate Gross Profit realized on such Products. If the actual aggregate Gross Profit for the Products invoiced during each calendar year is greater than 25% of the aggregate Operational Cost for such Products, Manufacturer will pay to Buyer an amount equal to the difference between (x) the actual aggregate Gross Profit realized on such Products and (y) the aggregate Operational Cost for such Products multiplied by 25%.
 
      (c) Within thirty (30) calendar days of the end of each calendar year, Manufacturer shall furnish Buyer with a calculation, on an aggregate basis, of the Gross Profit and Operating Cost for the Products invoiced during such calendar year, together with back-up for such calculation in reasonable detail, and a statement of the amount due to, or payable by, Manufacturer in accordance with the provisions of subsection (a) above (the “ Gross Profit Statement ”). Thereafter, Manufacturer will provide Buyer and its accountants with access to the records and employees of Buyer, to the extent reasonably related to Buyer’s evaluation of the Gross Profit Statement, the calculation of the Gross Profit or the resolution of any dispute with respect thereto. Within fifteen (15) calendar days after Buyer’s receipt of the Gross Profit Statement, Buyer shall notify Manufacturer in writing as to whether Buyer agrees or disagrees with the Gross Profit Statement, which notice, in the case of a disagreement, shall set forth in reasonable detail the particulars of such disagreement. In the event that Buyer does not provide a notice of disagreement within such fifteen (15) calendar day period, then Buyer shall be deemed to have accepted the calculations and the amounts set forth in the Gross Profit Statement delivered by Manufacturer, which shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes hereunder. If any notice of disagreement is timely provided in accordance with this Section 4.4(c) , Buyer and Manufacturer shall each use commercially reasonable efforts for a period of fifteen (15) calendar days thereafter (or such longer period as they may mutually agree) to resolve any disagreements with respect to the calculations in the Gross Profit Statement. If, at the end of such period, Buyer and Manufacturer are unable to resolve any disagreements as to items in the Gross Profit Statement, then the Parties shall engage KPMG LLP (the “ Auditor ”) to resolve any remaining disagreements. The Auditor shall be charged with determining as promptly as practicable, but in any event within thirty (30) calendar days after the date on which such dispute is referred to the Auditor, whether the actual Gross Profit as set forth in the Gross Profit Statement was prepared in accordance with this Agreement whether and to what extent the actual Gross Profit requires adjustment. The fees and expenses of the Auditor shall be shared by Buyer and Manufacturer in inverse proportion to the relative amounts of the disputed amounts determined in favor Buyer and Manufacturer, respectively. The determination of the Auditor shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes hereunder. The date on which the actual Gross Profit is finally determined in accordance with this Section 4.4(c) is referred to as the “ Determination Date .”
 
      (d) Non-recurring Costs shall be charged by Manufacturer to Buyer as incurred, and shall be paid by Buyer to Manufacturer within sixty (60) days of receipt of the invoice therefore. Manufacturer shall provide such back-up and detail with respect to any invoice for Non-recurring Costs as Manufacturer reasonably requests.
 


      (e) As used in this section—
 
                      i.         “Gross Profit” means net sales minus Operational Costs.
 
ii. “Operational Costs” means the sum of direct labor costs, raw material costs and other variable costs, indirect expenses (including without limitation indirect supervisory costs and allocated use of utilities, space and similar items), and fixed costs (including without limitation costs of periodic requalification with the European Space Agency or any other Governmental Authority and depreciation costs of new tools and equipment), but excluding Non-recurring Costs. For the avoidance of doubt, costs and expenses of shipping, insurance and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the shipment of the Products, shall constitute Operational Costs (as defined below) subject to the 25% Markup.
 
iii. “Non-recurring Costs” means costs incurred in connection with the manufacture of Products on a one-time or one-off basis and shall include, without limitation, costs of Product requalification with the European Space Agency (other than periodic requalification costs as set forth in Section 4.5), costs of complying with any change in specifications by the European Space Agency, and costs of non-routine equipment maintenance (for example, other than routine maintenance, including preventative maintenance, and calibration).
 
      SECTION 4.5 Last-Time Buy Order .
 
      (a) Buyer shall have a right to place a written last-time Firm Order for a Product (a “ Last-Time Buy Order ”) if Manufacturer delivers to Buyer notice of its intention to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.2 . The right of the Buyer to submit a Last-Time Buy Order shall entitle Buyer to purchase the Products at the price in effect for the products as of the time of Buyer’s exercise of such right.
 
      (b) A Last-Time Buy Order shall specify (i) number of units of the Product to be purchased and (ii) the requested delivery date or dates for such units. If Manufacturer informs Buyer that it cannot honor the requested delivery dates because of capacity restraints or otherwise, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith with respect to delivery dates mutually acceptable to Manufacturer and Buyer.
 
      (c) The Parties hereby agree to use commercially reasonable efforts to coordinate forecasting and ordering during the period between the date the Last-Time Buy Order is delivered to Manufacturer and the final delivery date to allow for regular supply of Products during such period.
 


ARTICLE V
CONFIDENTIALITY
 
      SECTION 5.1 Manufacturer and Buyer shall hold and shall cause each of their respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, agents, consultants, advisors and other representatives to hold, in strict confidence and not to disclose or release without the prior written consent of the other party, any and all proprietary or confidential information, material or data of the other party that comes into its possession in connection with the performance by the parties of their rights and obligations under this Agreement. The provisions of Section 4.5 of the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. and Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (the “ Master Separation Agreement ”) shall govern, mutatis mutandis , the confidentiality obligations of the parties under this Section.
 
ARTICLE VI
QUALITY CONTROL; PRODUCT WARRANTY; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
 
      SECTION 6.1 Quality Control . Manufacturer shall establish and maintain such quality control and testing systems for the manufacture of Products for sale by Buyer to the European Space Agency (“ ESA ”) as shall be required by that customer, consistent with past practice. Manufacturer shall also designate a technically competent employee who shall be responsible for the Manufacturer’s quality control and testing systems and who shall be available to ESA and the other customers of Buyer for Products to respond to technical inquiries concerning the Products, inquiries and claims concerning the compliance or non-compliance of Products with specifications and customer standards and inquiries and claims concerning quality control and testing issues, including product failure, with respect to the Products. Manufacturer shall notify Buyer as promptly as practicable, to the extent reasonable in the circumstances, of inquiries and claims received from customers of the Buyer as aforesaid.
 
      SECTION 6.2 Product Warranty; Merchantability Warranty . (a) Manufacturer warrants to Buyer that the Products shall, at the time of delivery to Buyer in accordance with Section 4.2 : (i) conform to the Specifications therefor, as provided in Section 2.2 ; (ii) be free from material defects; and (iii) be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing practice and Applicable Law (such warranty being referred to as the “ Product Warranty ”), in each case, except to the extent any such material defect or failure arises from an act or omission of VAT in manufacturing for, or supplying foil resistor chips to, Buyer.
 
      (b) EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT, NO WARRANTIES, OTHER THAN THE PRODUCT WARRANTY, ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED IN RESPECT OF THE PRODUCTS, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
 
      SECTION 6.3 Defective or Non-Conforming Products; Recalls .
 


      (a) Claims by Buyer relating to the quantity of or damage to any Product or the failure of any Product to conform to its Specifications must be made within one (1) year of receipt of such Product and must be in writing, specifying in reasonable detail the nature and basis of the claim and citing relevant control or lot numbers or other information to enable identification of the Product in question. Manufacturer’s liability to Buyer for damages for any such claim shall be limited to a refund for the price of the defective Product plus shipping costs or, at Buyer’s option, prompt replacement thereof with a Product that complies with the Product Warranty. Such refund and shipping costs or a replacement shall constitute Manufacturer’s sole and exclusive liability for such claims. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing shall limit the obligations of Manufacturer to Buyer in respect of third party claims against Buyer arising from the failure of any Product to conform to its Specifications.
 
      (b) Any notifications to either Party pursuant to Section 6.3(a) shall be subject to the confidentiality provisions of Article V above.
 
      (c) In the event of a recall of a Product resulting from a breach of this Agreement by Manufacturer of this Agreement or the gross negligence of Manufacturer, Manufacturer shall be responsible for all costs associated with such recall. Except as otherwise provided in the immediately preceding sentence, Buyer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the recall of a Product.
 
      SECTION 6.4 Indemnification . (a) Subject to Section 6.5 , Manufacturer shall indemnify and hold Buyer harmless from and against any Liability, including reasonable attorney’s fees and disbursements, arising out of any third party claim for death, injury or damage to property resulting from (i) Manufacturer’s breach of this Agreement; or (ii) any claim that a Product purchased from Manufacturer infringes any intellectual property right of a third party, except to the extent such claim relates to intellectual property transferred to Vishay Precision Group, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries prior to the Distribution Date (as such term is defined in the Master Separation Agreement).
 
      (b) Buyer shall indemnify and hold harmless Manufacturer from and against any Liability, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements, arising out of any third party claim for death, injury or damage to property resulting from use of any of the Products based upon Buyer’s breach of this Agreement.
 
      (c) Any Party seeking indemnification pursuant to this Section 6.4 shall promptly notify the other Party of the claim as to which indemnification is sought, shall afford the other Party, at the other Party’s sole expense, the opportunity to defend or settle the claim (in which case the indemnifying Party shall not be responsible for the attorneys’ fees of the indemnified Party with respect such claim) and shall cooperate to the extent reasonably requested by the other Party in the investigation and defense of such claim; provided , however , that any settlement of any such claim that would adversely affect the rights of the indemnified Party shall require the written approval of such indemnified Party; and provided further that an indemnified Party shall not settle any such claim without the written approval of the indemnifying Party.
 
      (d) The foregoing indemnification obligations shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement, in whole or in part, or the expiration or termination of the Term.
 


      SECTION 6.5 Limitation of Liability . In no event shall any Party be liable for any special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss of any kind, arising out of any breach of this Agreement, including breach of the Product Warranty, or any other obligations of any Party hereunder, or any use of the Products, and each Party hereby knowingly and expressly waives any claims or rights with respect thereto; provided , however , that in the event a Party is required to pay to a third-party claimant any special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss on any claim with respect to which such Party is indemnified by the other Party pursuant to this Agreement, such Party shall be entitled to indemnification from the other Party with respect to such third-party special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss to the extent resulting from the indemnifiable acts or omissions of the other Party.
 
      SECTION 6.6 Insurance . Each of the Parties shall maintain general liability insurance covering their activities under this Agreement in accordance with prudent and customary commercial practices, in such amounts as shall be agreed upon from time to time by the Parties.
 
ARTICLE VII
TERM OF AGREEMENT; RENEWAL TERM; TERMINATION
 
      SECTION 7.1 Term of Agreement . Unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 7.2 , the term of this Agreement shall be perpetual.
 
      SECTION 7.2 Termination . Either Party may terminate this Agreement at any time upon prior written notice to the other at least one (1) year prior to the requested date of termination.
 
      SECTION 7.3 Rights Upon Termination . Following a termination of this Agreement, (a) all further rights and obligations of the Parties under this Agreement shall terminate, and (b) Buyer shall pay Manufacturer an amount equal to the remaining book value (determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States) of any equipment and tools purchased by Manufacturer after the Distribution Date for the purpose of complying with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the termination of this Agreement shall not affect the rights and obligations of the Parties arising prior to such expiration or termination; and provided further that the Parties shall not be relieved of (i) their respective obligations to pay monies due or which become due as of or subsequent to the date of expiration or termination, and (ii) any other respective obligations under this Agreement which specifically survive or are to be performed after the date of such expiration or termination, including the provisions of Article V and Section 6.3 . Any Firm Order, including a Last-Time Buy Order, submitted prior to the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall be filled by Manufacturer pursuant to the terms hereof even if the delivery date is after expiration or termination.
 
ARTICLE VIII
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
 
      SECTION 8.1 The terms and provisions of Article VIII of the Master Separation Agreement, relating to the procedures for resolution of any disputes between the parties, shall apply to all disputes, controversies or claims (whether sounding in contract, tort or otherwise) that may arise out of or relate to or arise under or in connection with this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby, mutatis mutandis.
 


ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
 
      SECTION 9.1 Assignment . This Agreement and the rights and obligations of a Party hereunder shall be assignable or delegable, in whole or in part, (i) by Manufacturer without the consent of Buyer, to a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Manufacturer that succeeds to the conduct of the foil resistor business responsible for supplying the Products; (ii) by Buyer without the consent of Manufacturer, to a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Buyer; or (iii) by either Party, to any Person who is not a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of a Party only with the prior written consent of the other Party; provided , however , that no such assignment shall relieve the assigning Party of liability for its obligations hereunder. The following actions shall not be deemed an assignment of this Agreement: (1) assignment or transfer of the stock of a Party, including by way of a merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization in which outstanding shares of a Party are exchanged for securities, or (2) any transaction effected primarily for the purpose of (A) changing a Party’s state of incorporation or (B) reorganizing a Party into a holding company structure such that, as a result of any such transaction, such Party becomes a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of a holding company owned by the holders of such Party’s securities immediately prior to such transaction. Any attempted assignment other than as provided herein shall be void. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the successors and permitted assigns of the Parties.
 
      SECTION 9.2 Force Majeure . The Parties shall not be liable for the failure or delay in performing any obligation under this Agreement (except pursuant to Section 6.4 ) if and to the extent such failure or delay is due to (i) acts of God; (ii) weather, fire or explosion; (iii) war, invasion, riot or other civil unrest; (iv) governmental laws, orders, restrictions, actions, embargoes or blockages; (v) action by any regulatory authority which prohibits the manufacture, sale or distribution of the Products, except to the extent due to Manufacturer’s breach of its obligations hereunder; (vi) regional, national or foreign emergency; (vii) injunction, strikes, lockouts, labor trouble or other industrial disturbances; (viii) shortage of adequate fuel, power, materials, or transportation facilities; or (ix) any other event which is beyond the reasonable control of the affected Party; provided , however , that the Party affected shall promptly notify the other Party of the force majeure condition and shall exert its reasonable commercial efforts to eliminate, cure or overcome any such causes and to resume performance of its obligations as soon as possible.
 
      SECTION 9.3 Intellectual Property . All Intellectual Property owned or created by a Party shall remain its sole and exclusive property, and the other Party shall not acquire any rights therein by reason of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 9.4 Entire Agreement . This Agreement and the Exhibits hereto constitute the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all previous agreements, negotiations, discussions, understandings, writings, commitments and conversations between the parties with respect to such subject matter. No agreements or understandings exist between the parties other than those set forth or referred to herein or therein. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any Party or circumstance shall be declared void, illegal or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by Applicable Law. In such event, the Parties shall use their best efforts to replace the invalid or unenforceable provision with a provision that, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, achieves the purposes intended under the invalid or unenforceable provision.
 


      SECTION 9.5 Governing Law . This Agreement and the legal relations between the parties shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflict of laws rules thereof to the extent such rules would require the application of the law of another jurisdiction.
 
      SECTION 9.6 Consent to Jurisdiction . Subject to the provisions of Article VIII , each of the Parties irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan for the purposes of any suit, action or other proceeding to compel arbitration, for the enforcement of any arbitration award or for specific performance or other equitable relief pursuant to Section 9.16 . Each of the parties further agrees that service of process, summons or other document by U.S. registered mail to such parties address as provided in Section 9.10 shall be effective service of process for any action, suit or other proceeding with respect to any matters for which it has submitted to jurisdiction pursuant to this Section 9.6 . Each of the parties irrevocably waives any objection to venue in the federal and state courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan of any action, suit or proceeding arising out of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby for which it has submitted to jurisdiction pursuant to this Section 9.6 , and waives any claim that any such action, suit or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.
 
      SECTION 9.7 Independent Contractor . Nothing contained in this Agreement shall constitute a Party as a partner, employee or agent of the other Party, nor shall any Party hold itself out as such. Neither Party shall have the right or authority to incur, assume or create, in writing or otherwise, any warranty, Liability or other obligation of any kind, express or implied, in the name or on behalf of the other Party, and each Party is and shall remain an independent contractor, responsible for its own actions. Except as otherwise explicitly provided herein, each Party shall be responsible for its own expenses incidental to its performance of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 9.8 Set-Off . The obligation of Buyer to pay the purchase price for Products shall be unconditional, except as provided in this Agreement, and shall not be subject to any defense, setoff, counterclaim or similar right against Manufacturer or any of its Affiliates that could be asserted by Buyer or any of its Affiliates under any other contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding or otherwise under Applicable Law.
 
      SECTION 9.9 Waivers . No claim or right arising out of or relating to a breach of any provision of this Agreement can be discharged in whole or in part by a waiver or renunciation of the claim or right unless the waiver or renunciation is supported by consideration and is in writing signed by the aggrieved Party. Any failure by any Party to enforce at any time any provision under this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of that Party’s right thereafter to enforce each and every provision of this Agreement.
 


      SECTION 9.10 Notices . All notices, demands and other communications required to be given to a Party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if personally delivered, sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, transmitted by facsimile, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) to such Party at the relevant street address or facsimile number set forth below (or at such other street address or facsimile number as such Party may designate from time to time by written notice in accordance with this provision):
 
      If to Manufacturer, to:
 
      Vishay S.A.
      c/o Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
      63 Lancaster Avenue
      Malvern, PA 19355-2120
      Attention: Dr. Lior E. Yahalomi
      Telephone: 610-644-1300
      Facsimile: 610-889-2161
 
      with a copy to:
 
      Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
      1177 Avenue of the Americas
      New York, NY 10036
      Attention: Ernest S. Wechsler, Esq.
      Telephone: 212-715-9100
      Facsimile: 212-715-8000
 
      If to Buyer, to:
 
      Vishay Precision Foil GmbH
      c/o Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
      3 Great Valley Parkway
      Malvern, PA 19355-1307
      Attention: William M. Clancy
      Telephone: (484)-321-5300
      Facsimile: (484)-321-5301
 
      with a copy to:
 
      Pepper Hamilton LLP
      3000 Two Logan Square
      Eighteenth and Arch Streets

      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2799
      Attention: Barry Abelson, Esq.
      Telephone: 215-981-4000
      Facsimile: 215-981-4750
 


Any notice, demand or other communication hereunder shall be deemed given upon the first to occur of: (i) the fifth (5 th ) day after deposit thereof, postage prepaid and addressed correctly, in a receptacle under the control of the United States Postal Service; (ii) transmittal by facsimile transmission to a receiver or other device under the control of the party to whom notice is being given; (iii) actual delivery to or receipt by the party to whom notice is being given or an employee or agent thereof; or (iv) one (1) day after delivery to an overnight carrier.
 
      SECTION 9.11 Headings . The headings contained herein are included for convenience of reference only and do not constitute a part of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 9.12 Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered or transmitted by facsimile, e-mail or other electronic means, shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. A facsimile or electronic signature is deemed an original signature for all purposes under this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 9.13 Severability . If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any Person or circumstance is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof, or the application of such provision to Persons or circumstances or in jurisdictions other than those as to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable, shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby, so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner adverse to any party. Upon such determination, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith in an effort to agree upon such a suitable and equitable provision to effect the original intent of the Parties.
 
      SECTION 9.14 Waiver of Default . (a) Any term or provision of this Agreement may be waived, or the time for its performance may be extended, by the party or the parties entitled to the benefit thereof. Any such waiver shall be validly and sufficiently given for the purposes of this Agreement if, as to any party, it is in writing signed by an authorized representative of such party.
 
      (b) Waiver by any party of any default by the other party of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver by the waiving party of any subsequent or other default, nor shall it in any way affect the validity of this Agreement or any party hereof or prejudice the rights of the other party thereafter to enforce each and ever such provision. No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege.
 
      SECTION 9.15 Amendments . No provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed amended, modified or supplemented by any Party, unless such amendment, supplement or modification is in writing and signed by the authorized representative of the Party against whom it is sought to enforce such amendment, supplement or modification.
 


      SECTION 9.16 Specific Performance . The Parties agree that the remedy at law for any breach of this Agreement may be inadequate, and that, as between Manufacturer and Buyer, any Party by whom this Agreement is enforceable shall be entitled to seek temporary, preliminary or permanent injunctive or other equitable relief with respect to the specific enforcement or performance of this Agreement. Such Party may, in its sole discretion, apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for such injunctive or other equitable relief as such court may deem just and proper in order to enforce this Agreement as between Manufacturer and Buyer, or the members of their respective Groups, or prevent any violation hereof, and, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, as between Manufacturer and Buyer, each Party waives any objection to the imposition of such relief.
 
      SECTION 9.17 Waiver of jury trial . Subject to Article VIII, each of the Parties hereby waives to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law any right it may have to a trial by jury with respect to any court proceeding directly or indirectly arising out of and permitted under or in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each of the Parties hereby (a) certifies that no representative, agent or attorney of any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of litigation, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver and (b) acknowledges that it has been induced to enter into this agreement and the transactions contemplated by this agreement, as applicable, by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 9.17 .
 
 
 
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.
 
MANUFACTURER:
VISHAY S.A.
 
 
By:   
Name: 
Title: 
 
 
 
BUYER:
VISHAY PRECISION FOIL GMBH
 
 
By:   
Name: 
Title: 



EXHIBIT A
 
Products : Finished RCK Hi rel foil resistor products
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[***]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the Secretary of the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to an application for confidential treatment
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such portions are marked by [***].
 


Portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to an application for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such portions are marked by [***].
 
Exhibit 10.18
 
SUPPLY AGREEMENT
 
by and between
 
Vishay Precision Foil GmbH
 
as Supplier
 
and
 
Vishay S.A.,
 
a _____________________,
 
as Buyer
 
Dated as of ________, 2010
 


      This SUPPLY AGREEMENT (this “ Agreement ”) is made as of _____________, 2010 by and between Vishay Precision Foil GmbH (“ Supplier ”), and Vishay S.A., a _____________, (“ Buyer ”). Supplier and Buyer each may be referred to herein as a “ Party ” and collectively, as the “ Parties ”.
 
      WHEREAS, subject to the terms, conditions, commitments and undertakings herein provided, Supplier is willing to manufacture and sell those products as set forth on Exhibit A hereto (as the same may be modified from time to time pursuant to the provisions hereof, the “ Products ”) to Buyer, and Buyer desires to purchase the Products from Supplier, in such quantities as Buyer shall request , as provided in this Agreement;
 
      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
 
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
 
      For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings specified in this Article I:
 
      Affiliate ” means, as applied to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with that Person as of the date on which or at any time during the period for when such determination is being made. For purposes of this definition, “ control ” means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities or other interests, by contract or otherwise, and the terms “ controlling ” and “ controlled ” have meanings correlative to the foregoing.
 
      Applicable Law ” means any applicable law, statute, rule or regulation of any Governmental Authority, or any outstanding order, judgment, injunction, ruling or decree by any Governmental Authority.
 
      Buyer ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Confidential Information ” means all proprietary, design or operational information, data or material including, without limitation: (a) specifications, ideas and concepts for goods and services; (b) manufacturing specifications and procedures; (c) design drawings and models; (d) materials and material specifications; (e) quality assurance policies, procedures and specifications; (f) customer, client, manufacturer and supplier information; (g) computer software and derivatives thereof relating to design development or manufacture of goods; (h) training materials and information; (i) inventions, devices, new developments, methods and processes, whether patentable or unpatentable and whether or not reduced to practice; (j) all other know-how, methodology, procedures, techniques and Trade Secrets; (k) proprietary earnings reports and forecasts; (l) proprietary macro-economic reports and forecasts; (m) proprietary marketing, advertising and business plans, objectives and strategies; (n) proprietary general market evaluations and surveys; (o) proprietary financing and credit- related information; (p) other copyrightable or patented works; (q) the terms of this Agreement; and (r) all similar and related information in whatever form; in each case, of one party which has been disclosed by Supplier or members of its Group on the one hand, or Buyer or members of its Group, on the other hand, in written, oral (including by recording), electronic, or visual form to, or otherwise has come into the possession of, the other Group.
 
- 2 -
 


      DDP ” has the meaning and usage assigned to such words in the incoterms rules published by the International Chamber of Commerce.
 
      Firm Order ” means Buyer’s non-cancelable purchase order for Products to be purchased by Buyer from Supplier pursuant to this Agreement for delivery.
 
      Governmental Authority ” means any U.S. or non-U.S. federal, state, local, foreign or international court, arbitration or mediation tribunal, government, department, commission, board, bureau, agency, official or other regulatory, administrative or governmental authority.
 
      Group ” means, with respect to any Person, each Subsidiary of such Person and each other Person that is controlled directly or indirectly by such Person.
 
      Intellectual Property ” means all domestic and foreign patents and patent applications, together with any continuations, continuations-in-part or divisional applications thereof, and all patents issuing thereon (including reissues, renewals and re-examinations of the foregoing); design patents; invention disclosures; mask works; all domestic and foreign copyrights, whether or not registered, together with all copyright applications and registrations therefor; all domain names, together with any registrations therefor and any goodwill relating thereto; all domestic and foreign trademarks, service marks, trade names, and trade dress, in each case together with any applications and registrations therefor and all goodwill relating thereto; all Trade Secrets, commercial and technical information, know-how, proprietary or Confidential Information, including engineering, production and other designs, notebooks, processes, drawings, specifications, formulae, and technology; computer and electronic data processing programs and software (object and source code), data bases and documentation thereof; all inventions (whether or not patented); all utility models; all registered designs, certificates of invention and all other intellectual property under the laws of any country throughout the world.
 
      Last-Time Buy Order ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5 .
 
      Liability ” means, with respect to any Person, any and all losses, claims, charges, debts, demands, Actions, causes of action, suits, damages, obligations, payments, costs and expenses, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, specialties, indemnities and similar obligations, exoneration covenants, obligations under contracts, guarantees, make whole agreements and similar obligations, and other liabilities and requirements, including all contractual obligations, whether absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, known or unknown, joint or several, whenever arising, and including those arising under any Applicable Law, action, threatened or contemplated action (including the costs and expenses of demands, assessments, judgments, settlements and compromises relating thereto and attorneys’ fees and any and all costs and expenses, whatsoever reasonably incurred in investigating, preparing or defending against any such actions or threatened or contemplated actions) or order of any Governmental Authority or any award of any arbitrator or mediator of any kind, and those arising under any contract, in each case, whether or not recorded or reflected or otherwise disclosed or required to be recorded or reflected or otherwise disclosed, on the books and records or financial statements of any Person, including any Liability for taxes.
 
- 3 -
 


      Person ” (whether or not initially capitalized) means any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, firm, joint venture, entity, natural person, trust, estate, unincorporated organization, association, enterprise, government or political subdivision thereof, or Governmental Authority.
 
      Product ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Product Warranty ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(a) .
 
      Subsidiary ” of any Person means a corporation or other organization whether incorporated or unincorporated of which at least a majority of the securities or interests having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to elect at least a majority of the board of directors or others performing similar functions with respect to such corporation or other organization is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person or by any one or more of its Subsidiaries, or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries; provided , however , that no Person that is not directly or indirectly wholly-owned by any other Person shall be a Subsidiary of such other Person unless such other Person controls, or has the right, power or ability to control, that Person.
 
      Supplier ” has the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
 
      Supplier’s Other Manufacturing Obligations ” means the manufacturing obligations and commitments of Supplier to Persons other than Buyer, including Supplier’s Affiliates.
 
      Specifications ” means, with respect to any Product, the design, composition, dimensions, other physical characteristics, chemical characteristics, packaging, unit count and trade dress of such Product.
 
      Term ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.1 .
 
      Trade Secrets ” means information, including a formula, program, device, method, technique, process or other Confidential Information that derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other Persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use and is the subject of efforts that are reasonable, under the circumstances, to maintain its secrecy.
 
      Wholly-Owned Subsidiary ” of a Person means a Subsidiary of that Person substantially all of whose voting securities and outstanding equity interest are owned either directly or indirectly by such Person or one or more of its Subsidiaries or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries.
 
      The terms “ herein ”, “ hereof ”, “ hereunder ” and like terms, unless otherwise specified, shall be deemed to refer to this Agreement in its entirety and shall not be limited to any particular section or provision hereof. The term “ including ” as used herein shall be deemed to mean “including, but not limited to.” The term “ days ” shall refer to calendar days unless specified otherwise. References herein to “ Articles ”, “ Sections ” and “ Exhibits ” shall be deemed to mean Articles, Sections of and Exhibits to this Agreement unless otherwise specified.
 
- 4 -
 


ARTICLE II
PURCHASE AND SALE OF PRODUCTS
 
      SECTION 2.1 Agreement to Purchase and Sell Products . (a) During the Term, Supplier hereby agrees to manufacture and sell to Buyer, and Buyer hereby agrees to purchase and accept from Supplier, the Products in such quantities, within such delivery deadlines and on such other terms as reasonably necessary to enable Buyer to fill orders submitted by Vishay Precision Foil GmbH (“VPG GmbH”) for finished RCK foil products under the Manufacturing Agreement dated as of even date herewith between Buyer and VPG GmbH, as may be amended or supplemented from time to time (the “ Manufacturing Agreement ”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in the event that Buyer reasonably believes that Supplier’s manufacturing and delivery schedule will cause Buyer to breach its obligations under the Manufacturing Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in good faith to avoid a breach of either this Agreement or the Manufacturing Agreement.
 
      (b) All Products to be sold to Buyer pursuant to this Agreement shall be manufactured by Supplier or an Affiliate of Supplier; provided , however , that Supplier may subcontract the manufacture of any Product to a manufacturer that is not an Affiliate of Supplier with Buyer’s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided that any such subcontracting shall not relieve Supplier of its obligations hereunder.
 
      SECTION 2.2 Product Specifications and Changes . Supplier shall manufacture all Products according to the Specifications in effect as of the date of this Agreement, with such changes or additions to the Specifications of the Products as and to the extent necessary in order to enable Buyer to comply with the Manufacturing Agreement or as mutually agreed between the Parties. All other Products shall be manufactured with such Specifications as the Parties shall agree.
 
      SECTION 2.3 Supplier’s Supply Obligations . Supplier shall be obligated to manufacture and sell Products to Buyer, in accordance with Buyer’s Firm Orders, to the extent of Supplier’s then existing manufacturing capacity, taking into account Supplier’s Other Manufacturing Obligations; provided , however , the Supplier shall give equal priority to the orders of Buyer, on the one hand, and Supplier’s Other Manufacturing Obligations, on the other.
 
      SECTION 2.4 Product Changes . Supplier shall communicate any change in the Specifications for any Product or its manufacture in accordance with Supplier’s product change notification process. Buyer shall be deemed to have accepted such change unless, within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from Supplier, Buyer informs Supplier that such change is not acceptable. If Buyer informs Supplier that such change is not acceptable, Supplier may by notice to Buyer either (x) continue to supply the Product in accordance with the original Specifications and manufacturing procedures or (y) terminate this Agreement with respect to such Product on a date specified by Supplier in a notice of termination, which date shall not be earlier than the earlier of one (1) year from the date of Buyer’s information that it does not accept the change proposed by Supplier, subject to the right of the Buyer to submit a Last-Time Buy Order in accordance with Section 3.5 . Supplier shall not change the Specifications if to do so would prevent Buyer from being able to comply with its obligations under the Manufacturing Agreement.
 
- 5 -
 


      SECTION 2.5 Product Discontinuation . At any time Supplier may notify Buyer that Supplier is discontinuing the manufacture and sale of a Product. Such discontinuation shall take effect on a date specified by Supplier in a notice of discontinuation, which date shall not be earlier than one (1) year from the date of the notice of discontinuation; subject to the right of the Buyer to submit a Last-Time Buy Order in accordance with Section 3.5 . To the extent that a discontinuation by VAT under this Section 2.5 causes Buyer to be unable to satisfy its obligations under the Manufacturing Agreement, Buyer shall be released from any claims of breach of this Agreement caused by such discontinuation.
 
      SECTION 2.6 Consultation and Support . At either Party’s reasonable request, the Parties shall meet and discuss the nature, quality and level of supply services contemplated by this Agreement. In addition, Supplier will make available on a commercially reasonable basis and at commercially reasonable times qualified personnel to provide knowledgeable support service with respect to the Products. The Parties shall negotiate in good faith with respect to any fees and other charges incurred by Supplier in providing other than routine product support.
 
ARTICLE III
ORDERS AND PAYMENT
 
      SECTION 3.1 Purchase Orders . (a) Buyer may place a Firm Order for the Products with Supplier at any time and from time to time.
 
      (b) Each Firm Order shall specify (i) number of units of the Product to be purchased and (ii) the requested delivery date, provided that Buyer shall request a delivery date with a lead delivery time that is customary for the particular Product, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. Supplier agrees to provide Buyer prompt notice if it knows it cannot meet a requested delivery date.
 
      (c) If Buyer requires a Product on an emergency basis in order to comply with its obligations under the Manufacturing Agreement and so informs Supplier, and Supplier has the Product available in its uncommitted inventory, Supplier agrees to use reasonable commercial efforts to fill the emergency order as promptly as practicable.
 
      SECTION 3.2 Shipment .
 
      (a) The Products sold to Buyer shall be delivered DDP Buyer’s factory unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.
 
      (b) Supplier shall package all Products so as to protect them from loss or damage during shipment, in conformity with good commercial practice, the Specifications and Applicable Law. Buyer shall be responsible, at its own cost and expense, for the shipment (including, among other fees, costs and expenses, transit and casualty insurance and third party fees) of all processed materials by Buyer. Supplier shall cooperate with Buyer in assembling and coordinating shipments, as reasonably requested by Buyer.
 
- 6 -
 


      SECTION 3.3 Prices . Pricing for the Products shall be as set forth on Exhibit A , as such Exhibit may be modified from time to time by agreement of the Parties. At least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of each calendar year, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith changes to the pricing of the Products to be applicable in the ensuing year. The Parties will assure that any changes in the prices are coordinated with pricing changes under the Manufacturing Agreement.
 
      SECTION 3.4 Payment Terms . Unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties in writing, Buyer shall make payment separately for each Firm Order. Buyer shall pay the net amount of all invoice amounts within sixty (60) days of the date of Supplier’s invoice unless the terms of Supplier’s invoice permits later payment or allows for prepayment with a discount. Invoices shall not be sent earlier than the date on which the Products related thereto are delivered to Buyer.
 
      SECTION 3.5 Last-Time Buy Order .
 
      (a) Buyer shall have a right to place a written last-time Firm Order for a Product (a “ Last-Time Buy Order ”) at such time and in such quantities as may be required in order to comply with a last-time buy order under the Manufacturing Agreement. The right of the Buyer to submit a Last-Time Buy Order shall entitle Buyer to purchase the Products at the price in effect for the products as of the time of Buyer’s exercise of such right.
 
      (b) A Last-Time Buy Order shall specify (i) number of units of the Product to be purchased and (ii) the requested delivery date or dates for such units. If Supplier informs Buyer that it cannot honor the requested delivery dates because of capacity restraints or otherwise, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith with respect to delivery dates mutually acceptable to Supplier and Buyer.
 
      (c) The Parties hereby agree to use commercially reasonable efforts to coordinate forecasting and ordering during the period between the date the Last-Time Buy Order is delivered to Supplier and the final delivery date to allow for regular supply of Products during such period.
 
ARTICLE IV
CONFIDENTIALITY
 
      SECTION 4.1 Supplier and Buyer shall hold and shall cause each of their respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, agents, consultants, advisors and other representatives to hold, in strict confidence and not to disclose or release without the prior written consent of the other party, any and all Confidential Information, material or data of the other party that comes into its possession in connection with the performance by the parties of their rights and obligations under this Agreement. The provisions of Section 4.5 of the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. and the Buyer shall govern, mutatis mutandis , the confidentiality obligations of the parties under this Section.
 
- 7 -
 


ARTICLE V
PRODUCT WARRANTY; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
 
      SECTION 5.1 Product Warranty; Merchantability Warranty . (a) Supplier warrants to Buyer that the Products shall, at the time of delivery to Buyer in accordance with Section 3.2 : (i) conform to the Specifications therefor, as provided in Section 2.2 ; (ii) be free from material defects; (iii) be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing practice and Applicable Law; and (iv) and be suitable for use for manufacturing the finished RCK products under the Manufacturing Agreement (such warranty being referred to as the “ Product Warranty ”).
 
      (b) EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT, NO WARRANTIES, OTHER THAN THE PRODUCT WARRANTY, ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED IN RESPECT OF THE PRODUCTS, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
 
      SECTION 5.2 Defective or Non-Conforming Products . (a) Claims by Buyer relating to the quantity of or damage to any Product or the failure of any Product to conform to its Specifications must be made within one (1) year of receipt of such Product and must be in writing, specifying in reasonable detail the nature and basis of the claim and citing relevant control or lot numbers or other information to enable identification of the Product in question. Supplier’s liability to Buyer for damages for any such claim shall be limited to a refund for the price of the defective Product plus shipping costs or, at Buyer’s option, prompt replacement thereof with a Product that complies with the Product Warranty. Such refund and shipping costs or a replacement shall constitute Supplier’s sole and exclusive liability for such claims. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing shall limit the obligations of Supplier to Buyer in respect of third party claims against Buyer arising from the failure of any Product to conform to its Specifications.
 
      (b) Any notifications to either Party pursuant to this Section 5.2 shall be subject to the confidentiality provisions of Article V above.
 
      SECTION 5.3 Indemnification . (a) Subject to Section 5.4 , Supplier shall indemnify and hold Buyer harmless from and against any Liability, including reasonable attorney’s fees and disbursements, arising out of any third party claim for death, injury or damage to property resulting from (i) Supplier’s breach of this Agreement; or (ii) any claim that a Product purchased from Supplier infringes any intellectual property right of a third party.
 
      (b) Buyer shall indemnify and hold harmless Supplier from and against any Liability, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements, arising out of any third party claim for death, injury or damage to property resulting from use of any of the Products based upon (i) Buyer’s breach of this Agreement; or (ii) any change in condition of the Products caused by Buyer.
 
      (c) Any Party seeking indemnification pursuant to this Section 5.3 shall promptly notify the other Party of the claim as to which indemnification is sought, shall afford the other Party, at the other Party’s sole expense, the opportunity to defend or settle the claim (in which case the indemnifying Party shall not be responsible for the attorneys’ fees of the indemnified Party with respect such claim) and shall cooperate to the extent reasonably requested by the other Party in the investigation and defense of such claim; provided , however , that any settlement of any such claim that would adversely affect the rights of the indemnified Party shall require the written approval of such indemnified Party; and provided further that an indemnified Party shall not settle any such claim without the written approval of the indemnifying Party.
 
      (d) The foregoing indemnification obligations shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement, in whole or in part, or the termination of this Agreement.
 
- 8 -
 


      SECTION 5.4 Limitation of Liability . In no event shall any Party be liable for any special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss of any kind, arising out of any breach of this Agreement, including breach of the Product Warranty, or any other obligations of any Party hereunder, or any use of the Products, and each Party hereby knowingly and expressly waives any claims or rights with respect thereto; provided , however , that in the event a Party is required to pay to a third-party claimant any special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss on any claim with respect to which such Party is indemnified by the other Party pursuant to this Agreement, such Party shall be entitled to indemnification from the other Party with respect to such third-party special, consequential, indirect, collateral, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits or failure to realize expected savings or other commercial or economic loss to the extent resulting from the indemnifiable acts or omissions of the other Party.
 
      SECTION 5.5 Insurance . Each of the Parties shall maintain general liability insurance covering their activities under this Agreement in accordance with prudent and customary commercial practices, in such amounts as shall be agreed upon from time to time by the Parties.
 
ARTICLE VI
TERM OF AGREEMENT; RENEWAL TERM; TERMINATION
 
      SECTION 6.1 Term of Agreement . This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for so long as Vishay S.A. is obligated to manufacture finished RCK products under the Manufacturing Agreement (the “ Term ”).
 
      SECTION 6.2 Rights Upon Termination . Following a termination of this Agreement, all further rights and obligations of the Parties under this Agreement shall terminate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the termination of this Agreement shall not affect the rights and obligations of the Parties arising prior to such expiration or termination; and provided further that the Parties shall not be relieved of (i) their respective obligations to pay monies due or which become due as of or subsequent to the date of expiration or termination, and (ii) any other respective obligations under this Agreement which specifically survive or are to be performed after the date of such expiration or termination, including the provisions of Article V and 6.3 . Any Firm Order, including a Last-Time Buy Order, submitted prior to the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall be filled by Supplier pursuant to the terms hereof even if the delivery date is after expiration or termination.
 
- 9 -
 


ARTICLE VII
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
 
      SECTION 7.1 The terms and provisions of Article VIII of the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between VSH and VPG, relating to the procedures for resolution of any disputes between the parties, shall apply to all disputes, controversies or claims (whether sounding in contract, tort or otherwise) that may arise out of or relate to or arise under or in connection with this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby, mutatis mutandis.
 
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
 
      SECTION 8.1 Assignment . This Agreement and the rights and obligations of a Party hereunder shall be assignable or delegable, in whole or in part, (i) by Supplier without the consent of Buyer, to a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Supplier that succeeds to the conduct of the foil resistor business responsible for supplying the Products; (ii) by Buyer without the consent of Supplier, to a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Buyer or to any Person that succeeds to the obligations of Buyer under the Manufacturing Agreement; or (iii) by either Party, to any Person who is not a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of a Party only with the prior written consent of the other Party; provided , however , that no such assignment shall relieve the assigning Party of liability for its obligations hereunder. The following actions shall not be deemed an assignment of this Agreement: (1) assignment or transfer of the stock of a Party, including by way of a merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization in which outstanding shares of a Party are exchanged for securities, or (2) any transaction effected primarily for the purpose of (A) changing a Party’s state of incorporation or (B) reorganizing a Party into a holding company structure such that, as a result of any such transaction, such Party becomes a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of a holding company owned by the holders of such Party’s securities immediately prior to such transaction. Any attempted assignment other than as provided herein shall be void. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the successors and permitted assigns of the Parties.
 
      SECTION 8.2 Force Majeure . The Parties shall not be liable for the failure or delay in performing any obligation under this Agreement (except pursuant to Section 6.4 ) if and to the extent such failure or delay is due to (i) acts of God; (ii) weather, fire or explosion; (iii) war, invasion, riot or other civil unrest; (iv) governmental laws, orders, restrictions, actions, embargoes or blockages; (v) action by any regulatory authority which prohibits the manufacture, sale or distribution of the Products, except to the extent due to Supplier’s breach of its obligations hereunder; (vi) regional, national or foreign emergency; (vii) injunction, strikes, lockouts, labor trouble or other industrial disturbances; (viii) shortage of adequate fuel, power, materials, or transportation facilities; or (ix) any other event which is beyond the reasonable control of the affected Party; provided , however , that the Party affected shall promptly notify the other Party of the force majeure condition and shall exert its reasonable commercial efforts to eliminate, cure or overcome any such causes and to resume performance of its obligations as soon as possible.
 
- 10 -
 


      SECTION 8.3 Intellectual Property . All Intellectual Property owned or created by a Party shall remain its sole and exclusive property, and the other Party shall not acquire any rights therein by reason of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 8.4 Entire Agreement . This Agreement and the Exhibits hereto constitute the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all previous agreements, negotiations, discussions, understandings, writings, commitments and conversations between the parties with respect to such subject matter. No agreements or understandings exist between the parties other than those set forth or referred to herein or therein. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any Party or circumstance shall be declared void, illegal or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by Applicable Law. In such event, the Parties shall use their best efforts to replace the invalid or unenforceable provision with a provision that, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, achieves the purposes intended under the invalid or unenforceable provision.
 
      SECTION 8.5 Governing Law . This Agreement and the legal relations between the parties shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflict of laws rules thereof to the extent such rules would require the application of the law of another jurisdiction.
 
      SECTION 8.6 Consent to Jurisdiction . Subject to the provisions of Article VII , each of the Parties irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan for the purposes of any suit, action or other proceeding to compel arbitration, for the enforcement of any arbitration award or for specific performance or other equitable relief pursuant to Section 8.16 . Each of the parties further agrees that service of process, summons or other document by U.S. registered mail to such parties address as provided in Section 8.10 shall be effective service of process for any action, suit or other proceeding with respect to any matters for which it has submitted to jurisdiction pursuant to this Section 8.6 . Each of the parties irrevocably waives any objection to venue in the federal and state courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan of any action, suit or proceeding arising out of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby for which it has submitted to jurisdiction pursuant to this Section 8.6 , and waives any claim that any such action, suit or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.
 
      SECTION 8.7 Independent Contractor . Nothing contained in this Agreement shall constitute a Party as a partner, employee or agent of the other Party, nor shall any Party hold itself out as such. Neither Party shall have the right or authority to incur, assume or create, in writing or otherwise, any warranty, Liability or other obligation of any kind, express or implied, in the name or on behalf of the other Party, and each Party is and shall remain an independent contractor, responsible for its own actions. Except as otherwise explicitly provided herein, each Party shall be responsible for its own expenses incidental to its performance of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 8.8 Set-Off . The obligation of Buyer to pay the purchase price for Products shall be unconditional, except as provided in this Agreement, and shall not be subject to any defense, setoff, counterclaim or similar right against Supplier or any of its Affiliates that could be asserted by Buyer or any of its Affiliates under any other contract, agreement, arrangement or understanding or otherwise under Applicable Law.
 
- 11 -
 


      SECTION 8.9 Waivers . No claim or right arising out of or relating to a breach of any provision of this Agreement can be discharged in whole or in part by a waiver or renunciation of the claim or right unless the waiver or renunciation is supported by consideration and is in writing signed by the aggrieved Party. Any failure by any Party to enforce at any time any provision under this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of that Party’s right thereafter to enforce each and every provision of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 8.10 Notices . All notices, demands and other communications required to be given to a Party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if personally delivered, sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, transmitted by facsimile, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) to such Party at the relevant street address or facsimile number set forth below (or at such other street address or facsimile number as such Party may designate from time to time by written notice in accordance with this provision):
 
        If to Buyer, to:
 
  Vishay S.A.
  c/o Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
63 Lancaster Avenue
Malvern, PA 19355-2120
Attention: Dr. Lior E. Yahalomi
Telephone: 610-644-1300
Facsimile: 610-889-2161
 
with a copy to:
 
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Attention: Ernest S. Wechsler, Esq.
Telephone: 212-715-9100
Facsimile: 212-715-8000
 
If to Supplier, to:
 
Vishay Precision Foil GmbH
c/o Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
3 Great Valley Parkway
Malvern, PA 19355-1307
Attention: William M. Clancy
Telephone: (484)-321-5300
Facsimile: (484)-321-5301
 
with a copy to:
 
Pepper Hamilton LLP
3000 Two Logan Square
Eighteenth and Arch Streets
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2799
Attention: Barry Abelson, Esq.
Telephone: 215-981-4000
Facsimile: 215-981-4750

- 12 -
 


Any notice, demand or other communication hereunder shall be deemed given upon the first to occur of: (i) the fifth (5 th ) day after deposit thereof, postage prepaid and addressed correctly, in a receptacle under the control of the United States Postal Service; (ii) transmittal by facsimile transmission to a receiver or other device under the control of the party to whom notice is being given; (iii) actual delivery to or receipt by the party to whom notice is being given or an employee or agent thereof; or (iv) one (1) day after delivery to an overnight carrier.
 
      SECTION 8.11 Headings . The headings contained herein are included for convenience of reference only and do not constitute a part of this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 8.12 Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered or transmitted by facsimile, e-mail or other electronic means, shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. A facsimile or electronic signature is deemed an original signature for all purposes under this Agreement.
 
      SECTION 8.13 Severability . If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any Person or circumstance is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions hereof, or the application of such provision to Persons or circumstances or in jurisdictions other than those as to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable, shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby, so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner adverse to any party. Upon such determination, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith in an effort to agree upon such a suitable and equitable provision to effect the original intent of the Parties.
 
      SECTION 8.14 Waiver of Default . (a) Any term or provision of this Agreement may be waived, or the time for its performance may be extended, by the party or the parties entitled to the benefit thereof. Any such waiver shall be validly and sufficiently given for the purposes of this Agreement if, as to any party, it is in writing signed by an authorized representative of such party.
 
      (b) Waiver by any party of any default by the other party of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver by the waiving party of any subsequent or other default, nor shall it in any way affect the validity of this Agreement or any party hereof or prejudice the rights of the other party thereafter to enforce each and ever such provision. No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege.
 
- 13 -
 


      SECTION 8.15 Amendments . No provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed amended, modified or supplemented by any Party, unless such amendment, supplement or modification is in writing and signed by the authorized representative of the Party against whom it is sought to enforce such amendment, supplement or modification.
 
      SECTION 8.16 Specific Performance . The Parties agree that the remedy at law for any breach of this Agreement may be inadequate, and that, as between Supplier and Buyer, any Party by whom this Agreement is enforceable shall be entitled to seek temporary, preliminary or permanent injunctive or other equitable relief with respect to the specific enforcement or performance of this Agreement. Such Party may, in its sole discretion, apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for such injunctive or other equitable relief as such court may deem just and proper in order to enforce this Agreement as between Supplier and Buyer, or the members of their respective Groups, or prevent any violation hereof, and, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, as between Supplier and Buyer, each Party waives any objection to the imposition of such relief.
 
      SECTION 8.17 Waiver of jury trial . Subject to Article VII , each of the Parties hereby waives to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law any right it may have to a trial by jury with respect to any court proceeding directly or indirectly arising out of and permitted under or in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each of the Parties hereby (a) certifies that no representative, agent or attorney of any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of litigation, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver and (b) acknowledges that it has been induced to enter into this agreement and the transactions contemplated by this agreement, as applicable, by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 8.17 .
 
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 
- 14 -
 


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.
 
SUPPLIER:
VISHAY PRECISION FOIL GMBH
 
 
By:    
      Name:
  Title:
 
  
BUYER:
VISHAY S.A.
 
 
By:    
Name:
Title:

- 15 -
 


EXHIBIT A
 
Products : RCK foil resistor chips
 
 
 
 
 
 
[***]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to an application for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such portions are marked by [***].
 

    
 
                                       [ ], 2010
 
Dear Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Stockholder:
 
We are pleased to inform you that on June 15, 2010, the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. approved the spin-off of Vishay Precision Group, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary that operates our precision measurement and foil resistor businesses.
 
The spin-off will separate the ownership and management of our business and that of Vishay Precision Group, which we think will better enable both companies to focus on their core businesses. Vishay Intertechnology is expected to be a more competitive, pure-play discrete electronic components company.
 
We will effect the spin-off by way of a pro rata stock dividend to our stockholders as of June 25, 2010. Each holder of Vishay Intertechnology common stock will receive 1 share of common stock of Vishay Precision Group for each 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock held, and each holder of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock will receive 1 share of Class B common stock of Vishay Precision Group for each 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock held. The dividend will represent 100% of the equity of Vishay Precision Group outstanding at the time of the spin-off. We expect to distribute shares of Vishay Precision Group on or about July 6, 2010. Cash will be paid in lieu of fractional shares.
 
Stockholder approval for the spin-off is not required, and you are not required to take any action to participate in the spin-off. You do not need to pay any consideration or surrender or exchange your shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock. Holders who sell their shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock in the “regular way after the record date but prior to the distribution date will not receive shares of Vishay Precision Group. Following the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology common stock will continue to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VSH,” and we expect that Vishay Precision Group common stock will trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.” The shares of Vishay Precision Group common stock will be issued by book-entry with our transfer agent, which means that no physical certificates will be issued. Physical certificates will be issued only to holders of Vishay Precision Group Class B common stock.
 
We intend for the spin-off to be tax-free for stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To that end, based on representations made by Vishay Intertechnology, we have obtained a favorable ruling regarding the spin-off from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
 
The enclosed information statement, which is being provided to all Vishay Intertechnology stockholders, describes the spin-off in detail and contains important business and financial information about Vishay Precision Group.
 
We look forward to your continued support as a stockholder of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Sincerely,
  
 
Dr. Felix Zandman Dr. Gerald Paul
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors President and Chief Executive Officer
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.



 
                                       [ ], 2010
 
Dear Vishay Precision Group, Inc. Stockholder:
 
It is our pleasure to welcome you as a stockholder of our new company. Although we are a newly independent company, we have a strong history. We are a designer, manufacturer, and marketer of resistive foil technology products such as resistive sensors, weighing modules, and weighing systems for a wide variety of applications. In 2009, we generated $172 million in net revenue, had net earnings of $1.7 million, and generated cash flows from operations of $29.2 million. Our mission is to create value for you, our stockholders, and for our customers through our “vertical product integration” strategy and growing our business of manufacturing and marketing precision sensors, weighing systems, sophisticated digital weighing modules and other precision measurement products. We expect that our common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.”
 
Our management team is excited about our spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology, and is committed to realizing the potential that exists for us as an independent company focused on precision measurement. We invite you to learn more about our company by reading the enclosed information statement and we look forward to updating you on our progress in realizing our vision and mission. We would like to thank you in advance for your support as a stockholder in our new company.
 
Sincerely,
  
 
Marc Zandman Ziv Shoshani
Chairman of the Board of Directors President and Chief Executive Officer
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. Vishay Precision Group, Inc.



Subject to Completion, dated June 22, 2010
 
INFORMATION STATEMENT
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Common Stock
(Par Value $0.10)
 
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. is furnishing this information statement to its stockholders in connection with the spin-off of our company. In the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will transfer to us the assets and businesses which Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses and distribute on a pro rata basis to its stockholders all of our outstanding equity.
 
If you are a holder of record of Vishay Intertechnology common stock as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time on June 25, 2010, the record date for the distribution, you will receive 1 share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock that you own. If you are a holder of record of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock on the record date, you will receive 1 share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock that you own. You will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares which you would have received after application of the above ratio. As discussed under “The Spin-off—Trading of Vishay Intertechnology Common Stock Between the Record Date and Distribution Date,” if you sell your shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock in the “regular way” market after the record date and before the spin-off, you also will be selling your right to receive shares of our common stock in connection with the spin-off. We expect the shares of our common stock and our Class B common stock to be distributed by Vishay Intertechnology on or about July 6, 2010. We refer to the date of the distribution as the “distribution date.”
 
____________________
 
No vote of Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders is required, and therefore you are not being asked for a proxy in connection with the spin-off. You do not need to pay any consideration, exchange or surrender your existing shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of our common stock.
 
There is no current trading market for our common stock, although we expect that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop on or shortly before the record date for the distribution, and we expect regular way trading of our common stock to begin on the first trading day following the completion of the spin-off. We expect that our common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.” Our Class B common stock generally will not be transferable except in certain very limited instances, and we do not anticipate a market for the Class B common stock.
 
In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16.
 
____________________
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
____________________
 
This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.
 
The date of this information statement is [              ]
 


Table of Contents
 
 
Summary 1
Summary Financial and Other Data 12
Risk Factors 16
Forward-Looking Information 32
The Spin-off 33
Dividend Policy 44
Capitalization 45
Selected Historical Financial Data 46
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements 49
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 55
Description of Our Business 83
Management 94
Executive Compensation 103
Historical Compensation Tables 115
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners 130
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions 133
Description of Our Capital Stock 152
Description of Certain Indebtedness 159
Where You Can Find More Information 164
Index to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements F-1

i
 


SUMMARY
 
The following is a summary of material information discussed in this information statement. This summary may not contain all the details concerning the spin-off or other information that may be important to you. To better understand the spin-off and our business and financial position, you should carefully review this entire information statement. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this information statement to “Vishay Precision Group,” “we,” “our” and “us” mean the Vishay precision measurement and foil resistor businesses which will be contributed in the spin-off to Vishay Precision Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries. References in this information statement to “Vishay Intertechnology” mean Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
 
We describe in this information statement the precision measurement and foil resistor businesses of Vishay Intertechnology as if they were our business for all historical periods described. References in this information statement to our historical assets, liabilities, products, businesses or activities of our business are generally intended to refer to the historical assets, liabilities, products, businesses or activities of the transferred businesses as the businesses were conducted as part of Vishay Intertechnology and its subsidiaries prior to the spin-off.
 
We were incorporated in Delaware on August 28, 2009. Our principal executive offices are located at 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355. Our main telephone number is 484-321-5300.
 
Our Business
 
We are a designer, manufacturer and marketer of Foil Technology Products (strain gages, ultra-precision foil resistors, and current sensors) and Weighing Modules and Control Systems (transducers/load cells, instruments, weigh modules, and control systems) for a wide variety of applications.
 
Our business is currently part of Vishay Intertechnology and our assets and liabilities consist of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses. Following the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly traded company, and Vishay Intertechnology will not retain any ownership interest in us.
 
Resistors are basic components used in all forms of electronic circuitry to adjust and regulate levels of voltage and current. They vary widely in precision and cost, and are manufactured from numerous materials and in many forms. Foil resistors are the most precise and stable type of resistors available. A strain gage is a special type of resistive sensor for measurement of weights and stress.
 
Innovations in the fields of foil technology were the foundation of the Vishay Precision Group business.  The subsequent advancement of foil resistance and strain gage technology opened the door for us to numerous commercial applications such as for weighing modules and control systems on a vertical market basis.
 
Our growth and acquisition strategy focuses on vertical product integration, using our foil resistance strain gages in our load cell products and incorporating our load cells, electronic measurement instrumentation (containing foil resistors) and software into our modules and measurement systems. Current sensing foil resistor products are also part of certain control systems that we manufacture. From 2002 to 2008, Vishay Intertechnology completed the acquisition of multiple businesses and joint venture interests with operations in 12 countries, substantially expanding our business. Many of these acquisitions have been directed towards furthering our vertical integration strategy, and we expect to continue to focus our acquisition program in this direction.
 
- 1 -
 


In connection with the spin-off, we and Vishay Intertechnology will enter into a number of agreements that provide for an orderly separation and transition of the business and to govern our relationship following the spin-off.  These include a Master Separation Agreement setting forth the terms of the separation of our business from Vishay Intertechnology and the implementation of the distribution for the spin-off, a Tax Matters Agreement governing the allocation of tax liabilities and related matters between the companies, a Trademark License Agreement under which we will have certain rights to use the name Vishay related to our business, an Employee Matters Agreement that provides for the transition of employee benefits arrangements and allocates responsibilities for certain employee matters after the spin-off, and certain transition agreements, such as a Transition Services Agreement and a Supply Agreement, under which one party will provide certain services or supplies to the other party for a period subsequent to the spin-off.  For a more detailed description of these agreements see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions  Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology.
 
We believe we have a number of competitive strengths, including our strong product portfolio, our robust research and development capabilities, a diversified customer base, and consistent significant cash flow generation.  In 2009, 2008, and 2007, we generated $29.2 million, $22.5 million, and $32.1 million, respectively, of cash from operating activities.
 
Key challenges that we face include competition both in the U.S. and in other countries where we operate, challenges in implementing our acquisition strategy, and the need to deal with the impact of global economic developments.

The global economic downturn has had a significant impact on all industries, and our industry is no exception, as demonstrated by our operating results over the past two years.  Our net earnings (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $1.7 million, $(74.1) million, and $27.7 million, respectively.  Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflects a goodwill impairment charge of $93.5 million, reflective of the global economic downturn.
 
For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition and could also adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, see “Risk Factors” commencing on page 16.
 
Historically, we have operated as part of Vishay Intertechnology, sharing services and capital with Vishay Intertechnology’s discrete semiconductor and passive components businesses. Following our spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology, we intend to advance resistive foil technology by vertically integrating strain gages and current sensors into process control systems. As an independent publicly traded company, we believe we will be better positioned to compete in the precision measurement industry and to invest in and grow our business. We expect to continue our program of strategic acquisitions, particularly where opportunities present themselves to grow our control systems business and we will seek to achieve significant production cost savings through the transfer and expansion of manufacturing operations to countries, where we can benefit from lower labor costs or available tax and other government-sponsored incentives. We expect to continue to use our research and development, engineering, and product marketing resources to roll out new and innovative products. Our ability to react to changing customer needs and industry trends will continue to be key to our success.
 
- 2 -
 


Summary of the Spin-off
 
The following is a brief summary of the terms of the spin-off:
 
Distributing Company    Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware company. After the distribution, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. will not own any equity of Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Separated Company Vishay Precision Group, Inc., a Delaware company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. After the spin-off, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. will be an independent, publicly traded company.
Primary purposes of the spin-off
The following potential benefits were considered by Vishay Intertechnology’s board of directors in making the determination to approve the spin-off:
 
  • making Vishay Intertechnology a pure-play electronic components company;
  • allowing management of Vishay Intertechnology and us to focus on the disparate and non-overlapping products, technology, manufacturing processes, markets and customers of their respective companies;
  • optimizing resource allocation at each of the two companies for capital improvements, marketing, research and development and acquisition activity;
  • promoting independent market recognition for our business, with the expectation that the markets will value us with favorable metrics;
  • enhancing the compensation programs of Vishay Intertechnology and us, enabling both companies to incentivize management and key employees with cash bonuses and equity awards whose value is more closely tied to their performance; and
  • making available our own publicly traded equity with which to pursue opportunistic acquisitions.

- 3 -
 


Conditions to the spin-off   
As provided in the master separation agreement, the spin-off is subject to the satisfaction or, if permitted under the agreement, the waiver, of the following conditions:
 
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission having allowed our registration statement on Form 10, of which this information statement forms a part, to become effective, no stop order relating to the registration statement being in effect and this information statement having been mailed to stockholders of Vishay Intertechnology.
      
  • A private letter ruling having been received from the Internal Revenue Service confirming that distribution of our stock will be tax-free to Vishay Intertechnology and the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This private letter ruling has been received.
      
  • Vishay Intertechnology having received the opinion of Pepper Hamilton LLP confirming that the distribution of our stock will be tax-free to Vishay Intertechnology and the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. 
      
  • Vishay Intertechnology having received a ruling from the Israeli taxing authorities that the transfer of the Israeli companies into Vishay Precision Group will not give rise to a material amount of current Israeli tax. This ruling has been received.
      
  • The listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange having been approved, subject to official notice of issuance.
       
      
  • No order, injunction or decree having been issued by any court of competent jurisdiction preventing consummation of the spin-off or any of the other transactions contemplated by the master separation agreement or any of the related agreements.
     
  • Having received all governmental approvals and other consents necessary to consummate the distribution, except where the failure to obtain such approvals or consents would not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the parties to complete the spin-off or on the business, assets, liabilities, condition or results of operations of VPG, Vishay Intertechnology, or its respective subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Other than as specifically described in the first, second, fourth and fifth bullet points above, we are not aware that any governmental approvals or other consents are necessary to consummate the distribution.
 
The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions will not create any obligation on Vishay Intertechnology’s part to effect the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology has the right not to complete the spin-off if, at any time, Vishay Intertechnology’s board of directors determines, in its sole discretion, that the spin-off is not in the best interests of Vishay Intertechnology or its stockholders or that market conditions are such that it is not advisable to separate Vishay Precision Group, Inc. from Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
 
- 4 -
 


Indebtedness   
We will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology's outstanding exchangeable unsecured notes due 2102 (92 years), in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation. We expect that the liability we assume for Vishay Intertechnology s exchangeable notes will be approximately $13 million, however, the exact amount of the liability under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.  See note (h) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54 for additional information, including how the amount of liability that we expect to assume was estimated. Also, our Japanese subsidiary will continue to have debt of approximately $1.6 million outstanding. Otherwise, we do not expect to have outstanding indebtedness at the time of the spin-off. We expect to enter into a revolving credit facility with a consortium of banks to provide us with flexibility and additional liquidity, shortly after the separation. We historically have had significant amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology affiliates. The remaining balance of $33.4 million will be repaid at or prior to the spin-off. However, if our net cash position is less than $58.5 million as of the spin-off date, Vishay Intertechnology will make a capital contribution to us pursuant to the master separation agreement, up to a cap of  $58.5 million. See note (g) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54 for additional information concerning this capital contribution provision. For more information concerning our indebtedness, see “Description of Certain Indebtedness” beginning on page 159.
 
Following the spin-off, we expect to maintain a prudent capital structure.  As of the date of the spin-off, our expected debt balance represents only 6.6% of our total pro forma assets and only 7.1% of our pro forma tangible assets.  Our assets do not collateralize any of our debt obligations.
Capital stock to be distributed   Approximately 12.3 million shares of our common stock and 1.0 million shares of our Class B common stock will be distributed in the spin-off, based upon the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock expected to be outstanding on the record date. The shares of our common stock and Class B common stock to be distributed by Vishay Intertechnology will constitute all of the issued and outstanding shares of our capital stock immediately after the spin-off.
Warrants to be distributed
In connection with an acquisition, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued Class A warrants to acquire 7,000,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $20.00 per share and Class B warrants to acquire 1,823,529 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $30.30 per share. With the exception of the exercise price, the Class A warrants and the Class B warrants have identical terms and provisions. The exercise price of the warrants will be determined ten trading days after the spin-off based upon a formula included in the warrant agreement, described on page 153. Under the terms of these warrants, on the date of the spin-off, each holder of an outstanding and unexercised warrant is entitled to a warrant evidencing a right to purchase a number of shares of our capital stock that the holder would have received had the holder exercised the Vishay Intertechnology warrants immediately prior to the record date for the spin-off. For more information, see “Description of our Capital Stock – Warrants” beginning on page 153.
Distribution ratio   Each holder of Vishay Intertechnology common stock will receive 1 share of common stock of Vishay Precision Group for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock owned, and each holder of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock will receive 1 share of Class B common stock of Vishay Precision Group for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock owned.
 
- 5 -
 


No fractional shares    Vishay Intertechnology will not distribute fractional shares of our common stock or Class B common stock in the spin-off. The distribution agent will aggregate all of the fractional shares of common stock and sell them in the open market at then-prevailing prices on behalf of our stockholders. You will then receive a cash payment in the amount of your proportionate share of the net sale proceeds, based on the average gross selling price per share of our common stock after making appropriate deductions for any required tax withholdings. Holders of Class B common stock will be compensated by us for fractional shares based upon the same price used to cash out the fractional shares of common stock.
Record date June 25, 2010
Distribution date
July 6, 2010
Trading market and symbol We expect that our common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.”
Tax consequences Other than with respect to fractional shares of our common stock, no gain or loss will be recognized by, and no amount will be included in the income of, a holder of Vishay Intertechnology stock upon the receipt of shares of our stock pursuant to the spin-off for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Risk factors We face various risks and uncertainties relating to our business, our transition to an independent, publicly traded company and our intended capital structure. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16 of this information statement.
Relationship with Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. after the spin-off After the spin-off, we and Vishay Intertechnology will be independent, publicly traded companies, and Vishay Intertechnology will no longer have any ownership interest in us. We will, however, be parties to agreements that will define our ongoing relationship after the spin-off. For example, we will be permitted to use the Vishay name under a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free trademark license from Vishay Intertechnology. Under the terms of a transition services agreement that we expect to enter into with Vishay Intertechnology prior to the consummation of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will provide us, for a fee, for a period of 18 months after the spin-off, specified support services. Furthermore, Vishay Intertechnology will lease portions of certain buildings to us; and we will lease portions of certain buildings to Vishay Intertechnology. For more information, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” beginning on page 133.
Dividend policy We do not expect to pay regular cash dividends. Our board of directors is free to change our dividend policy at any time, although the revolving credit facility that we expect to enter shortly after the spin-off would prohibit the payment of cash dividends.
 
- 6 -
 


Questions and Answers Relating to the Spin-off
 
The following is a brief summary of the terms of the spin-off. Please see “The Spin-off” for a more detailed description of the matters described below.
 
Q: What is the spin-off?
 
A: The spin-off is the method through which Vishay Intertechnology will separate its existing businesses into two independent, publicly traded companies. In the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will distribute to its stockholders all of the outstanding shares of our common stock and our Class B common stock. Following the spin-off, we will be a separate company from Vishay Intertechnology, and Vishay Intertechnology will not retain any ownership interest in us. The number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock you own will not change as a result of the spin-off, although the value of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock may initially decline as a result of the spin-off because the value of our business will no longer be part of the value of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Q: How will Vishay Intertechnology’s dual-class capital structure impact the spin-off?
 
A: We will adopt a capital structure that is congruent with Vishay Intertechnology’s dual-class capital structure. Accordingly, Vishay Intertechnology common stockholders will receive shares of our common stock, which entitle the holder to one vote per share; and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stockholders will receive shares of our Class B common stock, which will entitle the holder to ten votes per share. For more information on the shares being distributed in the spin-off, see “Description of Our Capital Stock—Common Stock.”
 
Q: What is being distributed in the spin-off?
 
A: Approximately 12.3 million shares of our common stock and 1.0 million shares of our Class B common stock will be distributed in the spin-off, based upon the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock expected to be outstanding on the record date. The shares of our common stock and Class B common stock to be distributed by Vishay Intertechnology will constitute all of the issued and outstanding shares of our capital stock immediately after the spin-off. For more information on the shares being distributed in the spin-off, see “Description of Our Capital Stock—Common Stock.”
 
In connection with an acquisition, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued Class A warrants to acquire 7,000,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $20.00 per share and Class B warrants to acquire 1,823,529 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $30.30 per share. With the exception of the exercise price, the Class A warrants and the Class B warrants have identical terms and provisions. Under the terms of these warrants, on the date of the spin-off, each holder of an outstanding and unexercised warrant is entitled to a warrant evidencing a right to purchase a number of shares of our capital stock that the holder would have received had the holder exercised the Vishay Intertechnology warrants immediately prior to the record date for the spin-off. As a result, we expect to issue Class A warrants to acquire 500,000 shares of our common stock and Class B warrants to acquire 130,252 shares of our common stock. The exercise prices of these warrants will be based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation, based on a formula included in the warrant agreement. For more information, see “Description of our Capital Stock – Warrants.”
 
Q: What will I receive in the spin-off?
 
A: Holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock will receive a pro rata dividend of 1 share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock held by them on the record date and not subsequently sold in the “regular way” market. Holders of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock will receive a pro rata dividend of 1 share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock held by them on the record date. For more information on the shares being distributed in the spin-off, see “Description of Our Capital Stock—Common Stock.”
 
- 7 -
 


Q: What is the reason for the spin-off?
 
A: The following potential benefits were considered by Vishay Intertechnology’s board of directors in making the determination to approve the spin-off:
For more information on the reasons for the spin-off, see “The Spin-off—Reasons for the Spin-off.”
 
Q: What do I have to do to participate in the spin-off?
 
A: Nothing. If you are a holder of record of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the record date for the spin-off you will not be required to pay any cash or deliver any other consideration, including any shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock, in order to receive shares of our common stock in the spin-off. You are not being asked to provide a proxy with respect to any of your shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock in connection with the spin-off.
 
Q: How will Vishay Intertechnology distribute shares of Vishay Precision Group?
 
A: Vishay Intertechnology has appointed American Stock Transfer & Trust Company as the distribution agent to distribute shares of common stock of Vishay Precision Group to holders of the corresponding class of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the record date. Vishay Intertechnology will distribute directly the shares of Vishay Precision Group Class B common stock to holders of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock.
 
Q: Will I receive physical certificates representing my shares of Vishay Precision Group?
 
A: Holders of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the record date will receive shares of our common stock through the transfer agent’s book-entry registration system. These shares will not be in certificated form. As such, instead of a share certificate, Vishay Intertechnology stockholders will receive a statement from our transfer agent that details their ownership interest and the method by which they may access their account. Physical certificates will be issued to holders of Vishay Precision Group Class B common stock. For more information, see “The Spin-off—Manner of Effecting the Spin-off.”
 
- 8 -
 


Q: If I sell, on or before the distribution date, shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock that I held on the record date, am I still entitled to receive shares of Vishay Precision Group common stock distributable with respect to the shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock I sold?
 
A: Shortly before the record date for the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock will begin to trade in two markets on the New York Stock Exchange: a “regular way” market and an “ex-distribution” market. If you are a holder of record of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock as of the record date for the spin-off and sell those shares in the “regular way” market after the record date for the spin-off and before the spin-off, you also will be selling the right to receive the shares of our common stock in connection with the spin-off. If you are a holder of record of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock as of the record date for the spin-off and sell those shares in the “ex-distribution” market after the record date for the spin-off and before the spin-off, you will still receive the shares of our common stock in the spin-off.
 
Our Class B common stock generally will not be transferable except in certain very limited instances, and we do not anticipate a market for the Class B common stock.
 
Q: How will fractional shares be treated in the spin-off?
 
A: Vishay Intertechnology will not distribute fractional shares of our common stock or Class B common stock in the spin-off. The distribution agent will aggregate all of the fractional shares of common stock and, not later than one week after the distribution date (and likely within one or two business days) sell them in the open market at then-prevailing prices on behalf of our stockholders. Within three business days after such sale, we will send you a cash payment in the amount of your proportionate share of the net sale proceeds, based on the average gross selling price per share of our common stock after making appropriate deductions for any required tax withholdings. Holders of Class B common stock will be compensated by us for fractional shares based upon the same price used to cash out the fractional shares of common stock. For more information on fractional shares, see “The Spin-off—Treatment of Fractional Shares.”
 
Q: What is the distribution date for the spin-off?
 
A: Shares of our common stock will be distributed by the distribution agent, on behalf of Vishay Intertechnology, on or about July 6, 2010. Vishay Intertechnology will distribute our Class B common stock on the same date.
 
Q: What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences to me of the spin-off?
 
A: Other than with respect to fractional shares of our common stock, no gain or loss will be recognized by, and no amount will be included in the income of, a holder of Vishay Intertechnology stock upon the receipt of shares of our stock pursuant to the spin-off.
 
If you receive cash in lieu of a fractional share of our stock as part of the spin-off, you will be treated as though you first received a distribution of the fractional share in the spin-off and then sold it for the amount of such cash. You generally will recognize capital gain or loss, provided that the fractional share is considered to be held as a capital asset, measured by the difference between the cash you receive for such fractional share and your tax basis in that fractional share. Such capital gain or loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss if your holding period for such fractional share is more than one year on the distribution date.
 
Please see “The Spin-off—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-off” for more detail.
 
- 9 -
 


Q: Does Vishay Precision Group intend to pay cash dividends?
 
A: We do not expect to pay regular cash dividends. Our board of directors is free to change our dividend policy at any time, although the revolving credit facility that we expect to enter shortly after the spin-off would prohibit the payment of cash dividends. For more information about our dividend policy, see “Dividend Policy.”
 
Q: Will Vishay Precision Group have any debt?
 
A: We will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology s outstanding exchangeable notes due 2102, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation. We expect that the liability we assume for Vishay Intertechnology s exchangeable notes will be approximately $13 million, however, the exact amount of the liability under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.  See note (h) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54 for additional information, including how we estimated the amount of liability that we expect to assume. Also, our Japanese subsidiary will continue to have debt of approximately $1.6 million outstanding. Otherwise, we do not expect to have outstanding indebtedness at the time of the spin-off. We expect to enter into a revolving credit facility in the approximate amount of $40 million with a consortium of banks to provide us with flexibility and additional liquidity, shortly after the separation.
 
We historically have had significant amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology affiliates. The remaining balance of $33.4 million will be repaid at or prior to the spin-off. However, if our net cash position is less than $58.5 million as of the spin-off date, Vishay Intertechnology will make a capital contribution to us pursuant to the master separation agreement, up to a cap of  $58.5 million. For more information concerning this capital contribution provision, see note (g) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54.
 
Q: Who will pay the separation costs?
 
A: We and Vishay Intertechnology have entered into various agreements regarding the allocation of separation costs, consisting largely of tax restructuring, debt refinancing, professional services and employee-related costs. Substantially all of these costs prior to the spin-off have been paid for by Vishay Intertechnology. Costs incurred after the spin-off will be borne by the party incurring such costs. Separately, we have been incurring and will continue to incur costs as we implement organizational changes and prepare to operate as an independent, publicly traded company. These costs are being paid for by us.
 
Q: Who will manage Vishay Precision Group after the spin-off?
 
A: Our management team will be led by Ziv Shoshani, currently President of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and an executive officer of Vishay Intertechnology, who will serve as our Chief Executive Officer, and William Clancy, the Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller of Vishay Intertechnology from 1993 to 2009, who will serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Shoshani has had senior management responsibility for our business for the past several years. He has extensive experience with our product portfolio and the vertical product integration which forms the basis for our competitive strategy. Mr. Clancy has had over 20 years’ experience with Vishay Intertechnology’s financial management team, and is similarly familiar with our company. For more information on our management, see “Management.”
 
Q: What will the relationship be between Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. and Vishay Precision Group, Inc. following the spin-off?
 
A: After the spin-off, we and Vishay Intertechnology will be independent, publicly traded companies, with independent boards of directors, and Vishay Intertechnology will no longer have any ownership interest in us. We will, however, be parties to agreements that will define our ongoing relationship after the spin-off. For example, we will be permitted to use the Vishay name under a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free trademark license from Vishay Intertechnology. Under the terms of a transition services agreement that we expect to enter into with Vishay Intertechnology prior to the consummation of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will provide us, for a fee, for a period of 18 months after the spin-off, specified support services. Furthermore, Vishay Intertechnology will lease portions of certain buildings to Vishay Precision Group; and Vishay Precision Group will lease portions of certain buildings to Vishay Intertechnology. For more information on our relationship with Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology.”
 
- 10 -
 


Q: Where will Vishay Precision Group common stock trade?
 
A: Currently, there is no public market for our common stock. We expect that our common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.”
 
We anticipate that trading in our common stock will commence on a “when-issued” basis on or shortly before the record date. If trading begins on a “when-issued” basis, you may purchase or sell shares of our common stock up to and including the distribution date, but your transaction will not settle until after the distribution date. On the first trading day following the distribution date, any “when-issued” trading in respect of our common stock will end and regular way trading will begin. Regular way trading refers to trades that are settled through the regular settlement cycle, typically for securities such as our common stock on the third full trading day following the trade date. Shares of our common stock generally will be freely tradable after the spin-off. We cannot predict the trading prices for our common stock before or after the distribution date. Our Class B common stock generally will not be transferable except in certain very limited instances, and we do not anticipate a market for the Class B common stock.
 
For more information on the trading market for our shares, see “The Spin-off—Listing and Trading of Our Common Stock.”
 
Q: Do I have appraisal rights?
 
A: No. Holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock have no appraisal rights in connection with the spin-off.
 
Q: Who is the transfer agent for your common stock?
 
A: American Stock Transfer & Trust is the transfer agent for our common stock.
 
- 11 -
 


SUMMARY FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
 
The following tables present summary historical and pro forma financial data.
 
The historical statements of operations data for each of the years in the three years ended December 31, 2009 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been derived from our audited combined and consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
The historical statements of operations data for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, and the balance sheet data as of April 3, 2010 have been derived from our unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
The historical financial data as of March 28, 2009 and December 31, 2007 have been derived from our unaudited financial statements not included in this information statement.
 
The historical financial data should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
The unaudited pro forma financial data have been derived from our historical financial statements and adjusted to give effect to the spin-off. These adjustments are described under “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.” Our historical and unaudited pro forma financial data are not necessarily indicative of our future performance or of what our financial position and results of operations would have been if we had operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods shown.
 
- 12 -
 


in thousands, except per share As of and for the years ended December 31,
Pro Forma
2009       2009       2008 (c)       2007 (d)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net revenues $      171,991 $      171,991   $      241,700     $      239,036
Costs of products sold 119,286   119,286 161,804   154,525
Gross profit 52,705 52,705   79,896 84,511
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses   47,956 43,356 51,714 48,017
Restructuring and severance costs 2,048   2,048 6,349 356  
Impairment of goodwill -   - 93,465 -
Operating income (loss) 2,701 7,301 (71,632 ) 36,138
 
Other income (expense):
       Interest expense (369 ) (1,237 ) (1,574 ) (2,294 )
       Other 814 714 4,780 2,788
       Other income (expense) - net 445 (523 ) 3,206 494
 
Income (loss) before taxes 3,146 6,778 (68,426 ) 36,632
 
Income tax expense 3,786 5,057 5,689 8,829
 
Net earnings (loss) (640 ) 1,721 (74,115 ) 27,803
Less: net earnings attributable to
       noncontrolling interests 17 17 15 111
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Parent $ (657 ) $ 1,704 $ (74,130 ) $ 27,692
 
Pro Forma earnings (loss) per share data:
       Basic (a) $ (0.05 )                        
       Diluted (b) $ (0.05 )                      
 
Wt. avg. shares outstanding – basic (a)   13,300                          
Wt. avg. shares outstanding – diluted (b)   13,300                        
 
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents     $ 63,192 $ 70,381 $ 56,803
Total assets   209,779 254,863 319,981
Net payable to affiliates   18,495 47,436 29,477
Long-term debt, less current portion   1,551 1,761 2,237
Working capital   102,489 145,363 127,667
Total Stockholders' / Parent equity   148,090 150,158 229,420
 
- 13 -
 

 
in thousands, except per share As of and for the fiscal quarters ended
Pro Forma
April 3, 2010        April 3, 2010        March 28, 2009
Statement of Operations Data:
Net revenues $ 48,175 $ 48,175 $ 43,705
Costs of products sold   31,127       31,127       29,654  
Gross profit   17,048       17,048       14,051  
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses   13,797       13,207       11,024  
Restructuring and severance costs   -       -       479  
Operating income   3,251       3,841       2,548  
 
Other income (expense):                      
       Interest expense   (99 )     (207 )     (377 )
       Other   (24 )     (4 )     176  
       Other income (expense) - net   (123 )     (211 )     (201 )
 
Income before taxes   3,128       3,630       2,347  
 
Income tax expense   1,651       1,827       1,751  
 
Net earnings   1,477       1,803       596  
Less: net earnings attributable to                      
       noncontrolling interests   27       27       7  
Net earnings attributable to Parent $ 1,450     $ 1,776     $ 589  
 
Pro Forma earnings per share data:                      
       Basic (a) $ 0.11                  
       Diluted (b) $ 0.11                  
 
Wt. avg. shares outstanding – basic (a)   13,300                
Wt. avg. shares outstanding – diluted (b)   13,700                  
 
Balance Sheet Data:                      
Cash and cash equivalents $ 73,121     $ 80,421     $ 73,287  
Total assets          222,580              229,880       247,673  
Net payable to affiliates   -       33,443       47,656  
Long-term debt, less current portion   14,525       1,525       1,549  
Working capital   132,135       105,992       146,243  
Total Stockholders' / Parent equity   163,622       150,479              148,365

- 14 -
 


(a)   The number of shares used to compute basic earnings per share is 13.3 million, which is the approximate number of shares of our common stock and Class B common stock assumed to be outstanding on the distribution date, based on a distribution ratio of 1 share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and 1 share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock expected to be outstanding on the record date.
     
(b)      
The number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share is based on the number of shares of our common stock described in (a) above used to compute basic earnings per share, plus the potential dilution that could occur if potentially dilutive securities were exercised or converted into common stock.
 
There will be no potentially dilutive securities outstanding on the distribution date; however, potentially dilutive securities will be outstanding shortly after the distribution date, and any resulting dilution could be significant. We have approved certain initial equity compensation awards to our executive officers and directors. We also will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology's outstanding exchangeable notes due 2102, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation, and we are required to issue warrants to purchase our common stock to holders of Vishay Intertechnology warrants.
 
For periods in which there was a pro forma net loss, all of these potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation because they would be anti-dilutive.  Additionally, the computation for each period excludes certain instruments that we expect to be anti-dilutive because they are anti-dilutive to Vishay Intertechnology, and their exercise prices will be based upon a formula that is largely driven by the Vishay Intertechnology exercise prices for the replaced Vishay Intertechnology instruments.  We expect that such anti-dilutive instruments will represent an additional 800,000 to 1,000,000 potential common shares.
 
(c) Includes the results of Vishay Transducers India Limited from June 30, 2008 and of Powertron GmbH from July 23, 2008, the respective dates of acquisition.
 
(d) Includes the results of PM Group from April 19, 2007, the date of acquisition.
 
- 15 -
 


RISK FACTORS
 
You should carefully consider the following risks and other information in this information statement in evaluating our company and common stock. Any of the following risks, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition and could also adversely effect the trading price of our common stock.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
We face intense competition in our business.
 
We face various degrees and types of competition in our different businesses directly and, because we are vertically integrated, in certain instances these may each pose a threat us as a whole.
 
We have a significant market position in foil resistance strain gages and foil resistors. Foil resistance strain gages and foil resistors are also produced by competitors, principally competitors in China. We believe that our foil technology products provide superior performance relative to our competitors, but that could change if our competitors succeed in developing and introducing innovative competitive offerings. Also, our foil resistance strain gages compete with other types of strain gages such as semiconductor strain gages which we do not manufacture. We believe that other types of strain gages are not as reliable or stable as our foil resistance strain gages, but that could change as the technology for these other products continues to evolve. The ability of these competitors to improve the competitiveness or pricing of their products relative to our offering could adversely affect us.
 
The market for transducers/load cells products is highly fragmented and very competitive. Our load cell modules and systems face competition from numerous other system manufacturers. Competition for modules and systems is most often based on customer relationships, product reliability, technical performance, and the ability to anticipate and satisfy customer needs for specific design configurations. Many other manufacturers have more experience in particular geographic markets and specific applications than we do, and may be better positioned to compete in these areas. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully grow our business in the face of these competitive challenges.
 
Our strategy of vertical product integration exposes us to certain risks.
 
Our growth and acquisition strategy largely focuses on vertical product integration, for example, using our strain gages in our load cell products and incorporating our load cells and our electronic measurement instrumentation and software into our systems. Our load cell business is our second largest customer for our strain gages. Our systems business is exclusively using our load cells, although we also sell our load cells to third-party customers. Many of the acquisitions which form the core operations of our business in recent years have been directed towards furthering our vertical integration strategy, and we expect to continue to focus our acquisition program in this direction. While we believe this has been and will continue to be a sound business strategy, vertical product integration and the resulting interdependencies of our divisions exposes us to certain risks. As a consequence of our vertical integration, we compete with certain of our customers and potential customers for strain gages and load cells, who for that reason may elect not to do business with us. Also, acquisitions that we pursue for purposes of promoting vertical integration may fail to be successfully combined with our existing businesses or may otherwise not succeed as we anticipate. Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our company.
 
In the past we have grown through successful integration of acquired businesses, but this may not continue.
 
Our long-term historical growth in revenues and net earnings has resulted in large part from our strategy of expansion through acquisitions. We cannot assure you, however, that we will identify, have the financial capabilities to acquire, or successfully complete transactions with suitable acquisition candidates in the future. We also cannot assure you that acquisitions that we will complete in the future will be successful.
 
Such acquisitions or investments involve a number of risks, including the risks in assimilating the operations and personnel of acquired companies, realizing the value of the acquired assets relative to the price paid, distraction of management from our ongoing businesses and potential product disruptions associated with the sale of the acquired companies’ products. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
 
Future acquisitions could require us to incur or issue additional indebtedness or issue additional equity.
 
If we were to undertake a substantial acquisition for cash, the acquisition would likely need to be financed in part through bank borrowings or the issuance of public or private debt. This acquisition financing would likely decrease our ratio of earnings to fixed charges and adversely affect other credit metrics. We expect that our revolving credit facility will require us to obtain the lenders’ consent for certain additional debt financing and to comply with other covenants including the application of specific financial ratios. We cannot assure you that the necessary acquisition financing would be available to us on acceptable terms if and when required. If we were to make an acquisition with equity, the acquisition may have a dilutive effect on the interests of the holders of our common stock.
 
- 16 -
 


We might require additional capital to support business growth, and this capital might not be available.
 
We intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges or opportunities, including the need to develop new offerings or enhance our existing offerings, enhance our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing secured by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
 
To remain successful, we must continue to innovate, and our investments in new technologies may not prove successful.
 
Our future operating results depend on our ability to continually develop, introduce and market new and innovative products, to modify existing products, to respond to technological change, and to customize certain products to meet customer requirements. There are numerous risks inherent in this process, including the risks that we will be unable to anticipate the direction of technological change or that we will be unable to develop and market new products and applications in a timely fashion to satisfy customer demands. If this occurs, we could lose customers and experience adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.
 
Our success is dependent upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology and other intellectual property.
 
We rely on a combination of the protections provided by applicable patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as on confidentiality procedures and other contractual arrangements, to establish and protect our rights in our technology and related materials and information. We enter into agreements with each of our customers and distributors. These agreements contain confidentiality and non-disclosure provisions, a limited warranty covering our products and indemnification for the customer from infringement actions related to our products.
 
- 17 -
 

 
We believe that the measures we take to protect our intellectual property afford only limited protection.

Despite our efforts, it may be possible for others to copy portions of our products, reverse engineer them or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary, all of which could adversely affect our competitive position. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop technology similar to ours.  The laws of certain countries in which we manufacture do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. In the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) annual "Special 301" Report released on April 30, 2010, the adequacy and effectiveness of intellectual property protection in a number of foreign countries were analyzed. A number of countries in which we manufacture are identified in the report as being on the Priority Watch List. Those countries where particular concern is expressed include China, where the USTR find China's intellectual property enforcement to be largely ineffective and a non-deterrent, India, where the expressed concern was India's inadequate legal framework and ineffective enforcement, and Russia which has failed to fully implement bilateral intellectual property agreements. Costa Rica, Mexico, Argentina and the Philippines were also identified because of problems in intellectual property enforcement. Indonesia was another country identified because of the overall deterioration of its intellectual property protection enforcement climate and an unreliable judicial system for intellectual property cases. In addition, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand were identified as countries where piracy and counterfeiting remain widespread. The absence of harmonized intellectual property protection laws and effective enforcement makes it difficult to ensure consistent respect for patent and other intellectual property rights on a worldwide basis. As a result, it is possible for third parties to use our proprietary technology in certain countries without us having the ability to enforce our rights in those countries.
 
The success of our business is highly dependent on maintenance of intellectual property rights.
 
The unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights may increase the cost of protecting these rights or reduce our revenues. We may initiate, or be subject to, claims or litigation for infringement of proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights, which could result in significant expense to us, cause product shipment delays, require us to enter royalty or licensing agreements and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel from productive tasks, whether or not such litigation were determined in our favor.
 
We may be exposed to product liability claims.
 
While our agreements with our customers and distributors typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential material product liability claims, including appropriate warranty, indemnification, waiver and limitation of liability provisions, it is possible that such provisions may not be effective under the laws of some jurisdictions, thus exposing us to substantial liability. Moreover, defending a suit, regardless of its merits, could entail substantial expense and require the time and attention of key management personnel.
 
We must expend significant resources to obtain design wins without assurance that we will be successful.
 
We are targeting the market for sophisticated load cell modules and turnkey weighing and force measurement systems as a primary driver of our future growth. In many cases, we must initiate communication with our customers, and convince the customer that our products and systems will offer solutions for its business that are technically superior and more cost effective compared to their existing arrangements. To do so we must often expend significant resources, in terms of both cost and personnel, to develop technologically compelling products or systems with no guarantee that they will be adopted by our customers. The non-recurring engineering (“NRE”) costs for product development in these cases may be substantial. Also, customers will often require a lengthy period of onsite testing before committing to purchase our module product or custom system, during which period we will not be receiving material revenue from the customer. While a design win for our custom module products and systems may result in a long period of recurring revenue during which we hope to recover our costs, we must often internally finance our development costs over significant time periods. If our custom-designed products or systems fail to gain acceptance with our customers, we will likely be forced to absorb substantial NRE costs, which could adversely affect our business.
 
- 18 -
 


The long development times for certain of our products and systems may result in unpredictable fluctuations in revenue and results of operations .
 
Our sophisticated load cell modules and custom weighing and force measurement systems often involve long product development cycles, both to develop the product or system and to secure customer acceptance following what may be a lengthy onsite testing period. During product development and testing, we may incur substantial costs without corresponding revenues. If our custom product or system is ultimately accepted by the customer, we may then begin to realize substantial revenues from our development efforts. In particular, our precision weighing and force measurement systems can be priced for several hundred thousand dollars per unit, so that a contract to acquire one or more units can materially contribute to our revenues during the period or periods that we are permitted to recognize the contract revenues for accounting purposes. The nature of our custom product and system business may therefore result in substantial fluctuations in our operating results, including revenues and profitability, from period to period, even though there has been no fundamental change in our business or its prospects. This may make it difficult for investors to undertake period-to-period comparisons of our performance. Also, the fluctuating nature of key components of our revenues may limit the visibility of our management regarding performance in future periods and make it more difficult for our management to provide guidance to our investors.
 
We may not have adequate facilities to satisfy future increases in demand for our products.
 
Our business is cyclical and in periods of a rising economy, we may experience intense demand for our products. During such periods, we may have difficulty expanding our manufacturing to satisfy demand. Factors which could limit such expansion include delays in procurement of manufacturing equipment, shortages of skilled personnel, and physical constraints on expansion at our facilities. If we are unable to meet our customers’ requirements and our competitors sufficiently expand production, we could lose customers and/or market share. These losses could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Also, capacity that we add during upturns in the business cycle may result in excess capacity during periods when demand for our products recedes, resulting in inefficient use of capital which could also adversely affect us.
 
The nature of the market for our load cell modules and foil technology products may render them particularly susceptible to downturns in the economic environment.
 
Our load cell modules and foil technology products businesses are designed to replace and provide superior functionality over existing product infrastructure utilized by our customers. Often, it is only after introductory demonstrations by our sales and engineering teams that our customers come to appreciate the advantages of our products and systems and the long-term benefits of their adoption. Market factors, such as the recession that we have recently experienced, may make customers less receptive to adopting new technological solutions at our suggestion, even ones with demonstrated operational and financial advantages. During these periods, customers may defer or even cancel orders for products and systems for which they have previously contracted or given indications of interest. Also, since our business is concentrated largely in the industrial sector, we do not benefit from countervailing fluctuations in consumer demand. As a result, our business may be more significantly affected by the consequences of a general economic slowdown than other segments of our industry and may also take longer to recover from the effects of a slowdown.
 
Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation.
 
Many of the orders that comprise our backlog may be canceled by our customers without penalty. Our customers, particularly for our foil technology products, often cancel orders when business is weak and inventories are excessive, a situation that we have experienced during periods of economic slowdown. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the amount of our backlog does not exceed the level of orders that will ultimately be delivered. Our results of operations could be adversely impacted if customers cancel a material portion of orders in our backlog.
 
- 19 -
 


The complexity of our sophisticated measurement systems may require costly corrections if design flaws are found .
 
Our custom measurement systems combine sophisticated electronic hardware and computer software. We believe that the sophistication of our systems contributes to their competitive advantage over similar products offered by other system integrators. We go to substantial lengths to assure that our system products are free of design flaws when they are delivered to our customers for installation and testing. However, sometimes due to the systems’ complexity, design flaws may occur and require correction. If the corrections are substantial or difficult to implement due to the system s complexity, we may not be able to recover the costs of correction and retesting, with the result that our profit margins on these systems could be substantially reduced, or even result in losses, and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
 
Our results are sensitive to raw material availability, quality, and cost.
 
Although most materials incorporated in our products are available from a number of sources, certain materials are available only from a relatively limited number of suppliers.
 
The materials that are only available from a limited number of sources include certain molding compound, metal package suppliers, low resistance switches, polyimide film and laminating adhesives. We maintain a two year supply of strategic raw materials for continuity and risk assessment.  Our customers would need significant advance notification to qualify alternative materials, if we had to use them. Alternative suppliers are available worldwide for most of our raw materials, but significant time (between 3 to 12 months) would be required to qualify new suppliers and establish efficient production scheduling.
 
Certain metals used in the manufacture of our products are traded on active markets, and can be subject to significant price volatility.
 
Our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected if we have difficulty obtaining these raw materials, the quality of available raw materials deteriorates, or there are significant price changes for these raw materials. For periods in which the prices of these raw materials are rising, we may be unable to pass on the increased cost to our customers, which would result in decreased margins for the products in which they are used. For periods in which the prices are declining, we may be required to write down our inventory carrying cost of these raw materials, since we record our inventory at the lower of cost or market. Depending on the extent of the difference between market price and our carrying cost, this write-down could have a material adverse effect on our net earnings. We also may need to record losses for adverse purchase commitments for these materials in periods of declining prices.
 
Our product sales may be adversely affected by changes in product classification levels under various qualification and specification standards.
 
Certain of our products must be qualified or approved under various military and aerospace specifications and other standards.
 
We have qualified certain of our foil resistor and sensor products under various military specifications approved and monitored by the United States Defense Electronic Supply Center (“DESC”), and under certain European military specifications, and various aerospace standards approved by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) and the European Space Agency (“ESA”).
 
Certain of our load cell products are approved by the National Type Evaluation (“NTEP”) and International Organization of Legal Metrology (“OIML”). Our on-board weighing systems must meet approved standards to make them “legal for trade.”
 
Qualification and specification levels are based in part upon product failure rate. We must continuously perform tests on our products, and for products that are qualified, the results of these tests must be reported to the qualifying organization. If a product fails to meet the requirements for the applicable classification level, the product’s classification may be suspended or reduced to a lower level. During the time that the classification is suspended or reduced to a lower level, net revenues and earnings attributable to that product may be adversely affected.
 
- 20 -
 


Our future success is substantially dependent on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical, managerial, marketing, finance, and administrative personnel.
 
The competitive environment of our business requires us to attract and retain highly qualified personnel to develop technological innovations and bring them to market on a timely basis. Our complex operations also require us to attract and retain highly qualified administrative personnel in functions such as legal, tax, accounting, financial reporting, auditing, and treasury. The market for personnel with such qualifications is highly competitive. We have not entered into employment agreements with many of our key personnel.
 
The loss of the services of or the failure to effectively recruit qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.
 
Failure to maintain effective internal controls could adversely affect our ability to meet our reporting requirements.
 
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reasonable assurance with respect to our financial reports and to effectively prevent fraud. Beginning with the year ending December 31, 2011, we will be required to furnish a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Therefore, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we cannot provide reasonable assurance with respect to our financial reports and effectively prevent fraud, our operating results could be harmed. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. If we fail to maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed, we could fail to meet our reporting obligations, and there could be a material adverse effect on our stock price.
 
Future changes in our environmental liability and compliance obligations may harm our ability to operate or increase costs.
 
Our manufacturing operations, products and/or product packaging are subject to environmental laws and regulations governing air emissions, wastewater discharges, the handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances, wastes and certain chemicals used or generated in our manufacturing processes, employee health and safety labeling or other notifications with respect to the content or other aspects of our processes, products or packaging, restrictions on the use of certain materials in or on design aspects of our products or product packaging, and responsibility for disposal of products or product packaging. We establish reserves for specifically identified potential environmental liabilities which we believe are adequate. Nevertheless, new liabilities could arise, and we may have unavoidably inherited certain pre-existing environmental liabilities, generally based on successor liability doctrines. Although we have never been involved in any environmental matter that has had a material adverse impact on our overall operations, there can be no assurance that in connection with any past or future operation, acquisition or otherwise, we will not be obligated to address environmental matters that could have a material adverse impact on our operations. In addition, more stringent environmental regulations may be enacted in the future, and we cannot presently determine the modifications, if any, in our operations that any such future regulations might require, or the cost of compliance with these regulations.
 
- 21 -
 


The integration of our information technology systems is complex, and any delay or problem with this integration may cause serious disruption or harm to our business.
 
As a result of the spin-off, we are in the process of integrating currently unrelated information technology systems across our company. We are subject to risk that we will not be able to absorb the level of systems change, commit or acquire the necessary resources, and focus the management attention necessary for the implementation to succeed. Many key strategic initiatives of major business functions depend on information technology systems, and if we fail to properly execute or if we miss critical deadlines in the implementation of this initiative, we could experience disruption and harm to our business, such as adversely affecting our ability to process orders, invoice, report our results, and manage our business.
 
Our credit facility will subject us to financial and operating restrictions.
 
We anticipate entering into a revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks shortly after the separation from Vishay Intertechnology, which we expect to use for working capital and other purposes. The credit agreement will subject us to certain restrictions. These restrictions may affect, and in some cases significantly limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability to:
The credit agreement will also require us to maintain certain financial ratios. If we fail to comply with the covenant restrictions contained in the credit agreement, that failure could result in a default that accelerates the maturity of the indebtedness under the agreement.
 
- 22 -
 


Risks relating to our operations outside the United States
 
We obtain substantial benefits by operating in Israel, but these benefits may not continue.
 
We have substantial operations in Israel. The low tax rates in Israel applicable to earnings of our operations in that country, compared to the rates in the United States, have the general effect of increasing our net earnings. There can also be no assurance that in the future the Israeli government will continue to offer new tax incentive programs applicable to us or that, if it does, such programs will provide the same level of benefits we have historically received or that we will continue to be eligible to benefit from them. Any significant increase in the Israeli tax rates could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
 
Also, we have benefited from employment incentive grants made by the Israeli government in the past.  There can be no assurance that the Israeli government will continue to offer new grant programs applicable to us, and the lack of such grants may adversely affect the costs of our business in Israel in the future.
 
We attempt to improve profitability by operating in countries in which labor costs are low, but the shift of operations to these regions may entail considerable expense.
 
Our strategy is aimed at achieving significant production cost savings through the transfer and expansion of manufacturing operations to and in countries with lower production costs or other incentives, such as Costa Rica, India, Israel, the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of China (Taiwan). During this process, we may experience under-utilization of certain plants and factories in high-labor-cost regions and capacity constraints in plants and factories located in low-labor-cost regions. This under-utilization may result initially in production inefficiencies and higher costs. These costs include those associated with compensation in connection with workforce reductions and plant closings in the higher-labor-cost regions, and start-up expenses, manufacturing and construction delays, and increased depreciation costs in connection with the initiation or expansion of production in lower-labor-cost regions. In addition, as we implement transfers of certain of our operations we may experience strikes or other types of labor unrest as a result of layoffs or termination of our employees in high-labor-cost countries.
 
In connection with the transfer of manufacturing operations to lower-labor-cost countries, we are also increasing the level of automation in our plants for the purpose of seeking to optimize our capital and labor resources in production, inventory management, quality control, and warehousing. Although we have substantial experience with automation in several of our plants in higher-labor-cost countries, there are risks in seeking to increase the level of automation in plants which previously did not use a significant amount of automation. These risks include the possibility of inefficiencies and higher operating costs in the transition from manual to automated operations, and if the transition extends longer than anticipated, we could suffer product yield inefficiencies, contributing to higher product costs and increasing the time it will take for us to achieve a return on our investment in the capital equipment involved in the automation process. Furthermore, any layoffs or termination of our employees as a result of increased automation may lead to strikes or other types of labor unrest.
 
We are subject to the risks of political, economic, and military instability in countries outside the United States in which we operate.
 
Some of our products are produced in Israel, India, China, and other countries which are particularly subject to risks of political, economic, and military instability. This instability could result in wars, riots, nationalization of industry, currency fluctuations, and labor unrest. These conditions could have an adverse impact on our ability to operate in these regions and, depending on the extent and severity of these conditions, could materially and adversely affect our overall financial condition and operating results.
 
Our business has been in operation in Israel for 39 years. We have never experienced any material interruption in our operations attributable to these factors, in spite of several Middle East crises, including wars. However, we might be adversely affected if events were to occur in the Middle East that interfered with our operations in Israel.
 
- 23 -
 


We are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risks which may impact our results of operations.
 
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks, particularly due to market values of transactions in currencies other than the functional currencies of certain subsidiaries. From time to time, as part of Vishay Intertechnology, we utilized forward contracts to hedge a portion of projected cash flows from these exposures. As of December 31, 2009, we did not have any outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts, and after the spin-off, we will evaluate our own currency risk management approach.
 
Our significant foreign subsidiaries are located in the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, Japan, and India. We finance our operations in Europe and certain locations in Asia in local currencies. Our operations in Israel and certain locations in Asia are largely financed in U.S. dollars, but these subsidiaries also have significant transactions in local currencies. Our exposure to foreign currency risk is mitigated to the extent that the costs incurred and the revenues earned in a particular currency offset one another. Our exposure to foreign currency risk is more pronounced in situations where, for example, production labor costs are predominantly paid in local currencies while the sales revenue for those products is denominated in U.S. dollars. This situation in particular applies to our operations in Israel and China.
 
A change in the mix of the currencies in which we transact our business could have a material effect on results of operations. Furthermore, the timing of cash receipts and disbursements could have a material effect on our results of operations, particularly if there are significant changes in exchange rates in a short period of time.
 
Risks Related to the Spin-off
 
If the IRS determines that the spin-off does not qualify as a “tax-free” distribution or a “tax-free” reorganization, we and Vishay Intertechnology stockholders may be subject to substantial liability.
 
Vishay Intertechnology has received a private letter ruling from the IRS to the effect that, among other things, the spin-off will qualify as a tax-free distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” and as part of a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, and the transfer to us of assets and the assumption by us of liabilities in connection with the spin-off will not result in the recognition of any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes to Vishay Intertechnology. See “The Spin-off—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-off.”
 
Although the private letter ruling relating to the qualification of the spin-off under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code is generally binding on the IRS, the continuing validity of the ruling is subject to the accuracy of factual representations and assumptions made in connection with obtaining such private letter ruling. Also, as part of the IRS’s general policy with respect to rulings on spin-off transactions under Section 355 of the Code, the private letter ruling obtained by Vishay Intertechnology is based upon representations by Vishay Intertechnology that certain conditions which are necessary to obtain tax-free treatment under Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code have been satisfied, rather than a determination by the IRS that these conditions have been satisfied. Any inaccuracy in these representations could invalidate the ruling.
 
If the spin-off does not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then, in general, Vishay Intertechnology would be subject to tax as if it has sold the common stock of our company in a taxable sale for its fair market value. Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders would be subject to tax as if they had received a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of our common stock that was distributed to them, taxed as a dividend (without reduction for any portion of a Vishay Intertechnology stockholder’s basis in its shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock) for U.S. federal income tax purposes and possibly for purposes of state and local tax law, to the extent of a Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholder’s pro rata share of Vishay Intertechnology’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (including any arising from the taxable gain to Vishay Intertechnology with respect to the spin-off). It is expected that the amount of any such taxes to Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders and to Vishay Intertechnology would be substantial.
 
- 24 -
 


In the tax matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology, we will agree to indemnify Vishay Intertechnology and its affiliates for any liability for taxes of Vishay Intertechnology resulting from: (1) any action or failure to act by us or any of our affiliates following the completion of the spin-off that would be inconsistent with or prohibit the spin-off from qualifying as a tax-free transaction to Vishay Intertechnology and to you under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, or (2) any action or failure to act by us or any of our affiliates following the completion of the spin-off that would be inconsistent with or cause to be untrue any material information, covenant, or representation made in connection with the private letter ruling obtained by Vishay Intertechnology from the IRS relating to, among other things, the qualification of the spin-off as a tax-free transaction described under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. For a more detailed discussion, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology—Tax Matters Agreement.” Our indemnification obligations to Vishay Intertechnology and its affiliates are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. It is expected that the amount of any such indemnification to Vishay Intertechnology would be substantial.
 
We have no operating history as an independent company upon which you can evaluate our performance and, accordingly, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks that any newly independent company encounters.
 
Prior to the consummation of this distribution, we have operated as part of Vishay Intertechnology. Accordingly, we have no experience operating as an independent company and performing various corporate functions, including human resources, tax administration, legal (including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and with the periodic reporting obligations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), treasury administration, investor relations, internal audit, insurance, information technology and telecommunications services, as well as the accounting for many items such as equity compensation, income taxes, derivatives, intangible assets and pensions. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties encountered by companies in the early stages of independent business operations, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
 
We historically have obtained benefits of being part of Vishay Intertechnology, but those benefits will not continue.
 
While we believe the benefits of being an independent company outweigh the drawbacks, we have historically received certain benefits from being part of a larger organization, including access to certain resources and certain economies of scale. We may be unable to replace these benefits as an independent company, or only be able to do so at significant expense, which may adversely affect our business.
 
Our historical and pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of our results as a separate company and therefore may not be reliable as an indicator of our future financial results.
 
Our historical financial statements and unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated financial statements have been created from Vishay Intertechnology’s financial statements using our historical results of operations and historical bases of assets and liabilities as part of Vishay Intertechnology. Accordingly, the historical financial information we have included in this information statement is not necessarily indicative of what our financial position, results of operations and cash flows would have been if we had been a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.
 
The historical financial information is not necessarily indicative of what our results of operations, financial position and cash flows will be in the future and does not reflect many significant changes that will occur in our cost structure, funding, and operations as a result of the spin-off. While our historical results of operations include all costs of Vishay Intertechnology’s precision measurement and foil resistor businesses, our historical costs and expenses do not include all of the costs that would have been or will be incurred by us as an independent company. In addition, we have not made adjustments to our historical financial information to reflect changes, many of which are significant, that will occur in our cost structure, financing and operations as a result of the spin-off. These changes include potentially increased costs associated with reduced access to resources, economies of scale, and purchasing power.
 
- 25 -
 


While our combined and consolidated financial statements are calculated on a separate tax return basis, our effective income tax rate as reflected in our historical financial statements and pro forma financial information also may not be indicative of our future effective income tax rate. Among other things, the rate may be materially impacted by changes in the mix of our earnings from the various jurisdictions in which we operate, the tax characteristics of our earnings, the timing and amount of earnings of foreign subsidiaries that we repatriate to the United States, which may increase our tax expense and taxes paid, the timing and results of any reviews of our income tax filing positions in the jurisdictions in which we transact business, and the expiration of the tax incentives for manufacturing operations in Israel.
 
We may not be successful in establishing an independent identity.
 
We have historically conducted our business under the Vishay trade name and trade names acquired as part of our vertical product integration. We believe our customers, suppliers, and potential employees recognize the value of those brand names, and accordingly, we have entered into an agreement with Vishay Intertechnology to continue to use the Vishay trade name and trademarks as part of our marketing effort. As part of our separation from Vishay Intertechnology, we are now investing time, effort and resources to establish our independent identity in the marketplace. The shared use of the Vishay trade names may cause confusion in the marketplace and inappropriately link the two companies despite the spin-off. We do not know whether our effort to establish our independent identity will be successful, the cost of doing so may be substantial, and any resulting confusion could cause us substantial harm.
 
Vishay Intertechnology will provide a number of services to us pursuant to a transition services agreement. When the transition services agreement terminates, we will be required to replace Vishay Intertechnology’s services internally or through third parties on terms that may be less favorable to us.
 
Under the terms of a transition services agreement that we expect to enter into with Vishay Intertechnology prior to the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will provide to us, for a fee, specified support services related to information technology for a period of up to 18 months following the spin-off. When the transition services agreement terminates, Vishay Intertechnology will no longer be obligated to provide any of these services to us, and we will be required to assume the responsibility for these functions ourselves. While we anticipate being prepared to perform these functions on our own at or before the expiration of the transition services agreement, there is no assurance of our ability to do so. If we cannot perform these services for ourselves, we may be required to retain an outside service provider at rates in excess of the fees that we will pay under the transition services agreement, which could adversely affect us.
 
The absence of representations and warranties and the “as is, where is” nature of the spin-off is customary for transactions of this nature, but these characteristics may be considered to be unfavorable to us in comparison to the types of contractual protections we might be expected to receive from a seller if we were instead purchasing all of our assets from Vishay Intertechnology in an arms-length negotiated transaction.
 
Neither we nor Vishay Intertechnology will make any representation or warranty as to the assets or liabilities transferred or assumed, the value or freedom from any lien or other security interest of any assets transferred, the absence of any defenses relating to any claim of either party or the legal sufficiency of any conveyance documents or as to any consents or governmental approvals which may be required in connection with the transfers. Except as expressly set forth in the master separation agreement or in any ancillary agreement, all assets will be transferred on an “as is, where is” basis. The absence of representations and warranties and the “as is, where is” nature of the spin-off is customary for transactions of this nature, in which we are acquiring all of our assets, subject to specified liabilities being assumed, without paying a fair market value purchase price.  These characteristics of the spin-off may be considered to be unfavorable to us in comparison to the types of contractual protections we might be expected to receive from a seller if we were instead purchasing all of our assets from Vishay Intertechnology in an arms-length negotiated transaction.
 
- 26 -
 


We will agree to certain restrictions in order to comply with U.S. federal income tax requirements for a tax-free spin-off and may not be able to engage in acquisitions with related parties and other strategic transactions that may otherwise be in our best interests.
 
Current U.S. federal tax law that applies to spin-offs generally creates a presumption that the spin-off would be taxable to Vishay Intertechnology but not to its stockholders if we engage in, or enter into an agreement to engage in, a plan or series of related transactions that would result in the acquisition of a 50% or greater interest (by vote or by value) in our stock ownership during the four-year period beginning on the date that begins two years before the spin-off, unless it is established that the transaction is not pursuant to a plan related to the spin-off. United States Treasury Regulations generally provide that whether an acquisition of our stock and a spin-off are part of a plan is determined based on all of the facts and circumstances, including specific factors listed in the regulations. In addition, the regulations provide certain “safe harbors” for acquisitions of our stock that are not considered to be part of a plan related to the spin-off.
 
There are other restrictions imposed on us under current U.S. federal tax law for spin-offs and with which we will need to comply in order to preserve the favorable tax treatment of the distribution, such as limitations on sales or redemptions of our common stock for cash or other property following the distribution.
 
In the tax matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology, we will agree that, among other things, we will not take any actions that would result in any tax being imposed on Vishay Intertechnology as a result of the spin-off. Further, for the two-year period following the spin-off, we will agree not to: (1) repurchase any of our stock except in certain circumstances permitted by the IRS guidelines, (2) voluntarily dissolve or liquidate or engage in any merger (except certain cash acquisition mergers), consolidation, or other reorganizations except for certain mergers of our wholly-owned subsidiaries to the extent not inconsistent with the tax-free status of the spin-off, or (3) sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of more than 50% of our assets, excluding any sales conducted in the ordinary course of business.
 
We will, however, be permitted to take certain actions otherwise prohibited by the tax matters agreement if we provide Vishay Intertechnology with an opinion of tax counsel or private letter ruling from the IRS, reasonably acceptable to Vishay Intertechnology, to the effect that these actions will not affect the tax-free nature of the spin-off. These restrictions could substantially limit our strategic and operational flexibility, including our ability to finance our operations by issuing equity securities, make acquisitions using equity securities, repurchase our equity securities, raise money by selling assets, or enter into business combination transactions.
 
Substantial sales of our common stock following the distribution may have an adverse impact on the trading price of our common stock.
 
Some of the Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders who receive our shares of common stock may decide that their investment objectives do not include ownership of our shares, and may sell their shares of common stock following the distribution. In particular, certain Vishay Intertechnology stockholders that are institutional investors have investment parameters that depend on their portfolio companies maintaining a minimum market capitalization that we may not achieve after the distribution. We cannot predict whether other stockholders will resell large numbers of our shares of common stock in the public market following the distribution or how quickly they may resell these shares. If our stockholders sell large numbers of our shares of common stock over a short period of time, or if investors anticipate large sales of our shares of common stock over a short period of time, this could adversely affect the trading price of our shares of common stock.
 
- 27 -
 


Dr. Felix Zandman, who founded our business and continues to be active in technical developments, will be a consultant to us but will not be devoting any substantial time to us .
 
Our business was begun by Dr. Felix Zandman, and his inventions form the basis for many of our core products. Dr. Zandman has been active in the technical side of our business and has also been involved in the search for complementary technologies and businesses to promote our strategy of vertical integration. Following the spin-off, Dr. Zandman is expected to serve as an R&D consultant to our company. However, Dr. Zandman will continue to serve as executive chairman of the board and chief technical and business development officer of Vishay Intertechnology and therefore can be expected to devote the substantial majority of his time following the spin-off to Vishay Intertechnology and its businesses. The time that he will be able to devote as a consultant to our business will be limited to 5% of his working time, which could adversely affect us.
 
Especially in the current environment, our smaller size may make it difficult for us to raise debt financing if we need to do so.
 
We anticipate that shortly after the consummation of the spin-off, we will have in place a revolving credit facility that will allow us to borrow up to $40 million to fund our working capital requirements and for other operational uses. We also anticipate that we will have at that time cash in the amount of approximately $70 to $80 million. While we expect that the combination of our cash and availability under the revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future, if we do require additional cash, for example for the purposes of financing acquisitions, we may have difficulty obtaining additional borrowings in the credit markets, on terms that we find commercially acceptable or at all. Since the beginning of the recent economic downturn, banks have tightened their lending standards. Our smaller size and the absence of a history of operations as a stand-alone company could make lenders reluctant to lend to us, especially in the current environment.
 
The terms of our spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology may reduce the likelihood of any potential change of control or unsolicited acquisition proposal that you might consider favorable.
 
The terms of our spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology could delay or prevent a change of control that you may favor. An acquisition or issuance of our common stock could trigger the application of Section 355(e) of the Code. For a discussion of Section 355(e) of the Code, please see “The Spin-off—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-off.” Under the tax matters agreement we will enter into with Vishay Intertechnology, we would be required to indemnify Vishay Intertechnology for the resulting tax in connection with such an acquisition or issuance and this indemnity obligation might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that you may consider favorable.
 
See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology—Tax Matters Agreement” and “Description of Our Capital Stock” for a more detailed description of these agreements and of these provisions of Delaware law, our charter and bylaws.
 
Until the distribution occurs, Vishay Intertechnology has the sole discretion to change the terms of the spin-off in ways which may be unfavorable to us.
 
Until the distribution occurs, Vishay Intertechnology will have the sole and absolute discretion to determine and change the terms of, and whether to proceed with, the distribution, including the establishment of the record date and distribution date. These changes could be unfavorable to us. In addition, Vishay Intertechnology may decide at any time not to proceed with the spin-off.
 
- 28 -
 


We will be using the mark Vishay under license from Vishay Intertechnology, Inc, which could result in product and market confusion .
 
Although we will be an independent company following the spin-off, we will continue to use the mark Vishay as part of our name and in connection with many of our products. Our use of the Vishay mark will be governed by an agreement between us and Vishay Intertechnology, giving us a perpetual, royalty-free, worldwide license for the use of the mark. We believe that it is important that we continue the use of the Vishay name in order to benefit from the reputation of the Vishay brand, which was first used in connection with our foil resistors and strain gages when Vishay Intertechnology was founded over 40 years ago. There are risks associated with our use of the Vishay mark, however, both for us and for Vishay Intertechnology. Because both we and Vishay Intertechnology will be using the Vishay mark, confusion could arise in the market regarding the products offered by the two companies, and there could be a misplaced perception of our continuing to be associated with Vishay Intertechnology. Also, any negative publicity associated with one of the two companies in the future could adversely affect the public image of the other. Finally, Vishay Intertechnology will have the right to terminate the license agreement in certain extreme circumstances if we are in material and repeated breach of the terms of the agreement, which would likely have an adverse effect on us and our business.
 
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
 
There is no existing market for our common stock and a trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not develop.
 
There currently is no public market for our common stock. We have applied for listing of our shares on the New York Stock Exchange and anticipate that our shares will be traded there under the symbol “VPG.” We anticipate that, on or shortly before the record date for the distribution, trading of our common shares will begin on a “when-issued” basis and will continue through the distribution date. Beginning on the first trading date after the distribution date, we anticipate that our shares will begin trading “regular way” on the New York Stock Exchange. However, we cannot assure you that an active trading market for our common shares will develop as a result of the distribution or be sustained in the future. If a liquid trading market for our shares does not develop, you may have difficulty disposing of your shares of our common stock, at prices that are attractive to you or at all.
 
We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade, and the trading prices may fluctuate widely.
 
We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade after the distribution. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending upon many factors, including:
There can be no assurance that the combined trading prices of our common stock and Vishay Intertechnology common stock after the spin-off will be greater than the trading price for Vishay Intertechnology common stock prior to the spin-off, and the combined trading prices may be lower.
 
- 29 -
 


Our smaller size may affect the trading market for our shares.
 
We will be a substantially smaller company than Vishay Intertechnology. Our revenues for 2009 were only about 8.4% of the revenues of Vishay Intertechnology for the same year, and our assets as of December 31, 2009 were only about 7.7% of the assets of Vishay Intertechnology at the same date. At least initially we will be considered a “microcap” company. Our trading volume, once it has stabilized following the distribution of our shares, is likely to be much lower than the historical trading volume for Vishay Intertechnology. Also, it is possible that there will be less market and institutional interest in our shares, and that we will not attract substantial coverage in the analyst community. As a result, the trading market for our shares may be less liquid, making it more difficult for investors to dispose of their shares at favorable prices, and investors may have less independent information and analysis available to them concerning our company.
 
Investors may be unable to accurately value our common stock based upon comparable companies.
 
Investors often value companies based on the stock prices and results of operations of other comparable companies. Currently, no public company exists that is directly comparable to our size, scale and product offerings. Therefore, investors may find it difficult to accurately value our common shares, which may cause our common shares to trade at a lower value.
 
The holders of Class B common stock will have effective voting control of our company.
 
Similar to the capital structure of Vishay Intertechnology, we will have two classes of common stock: common stock and Class B common stock. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held, while the holders of Class B common stock are entitled to 10 votes for each share held. Currently, the holders of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock hold approximately 45% of the voting power of that company, and they are expected to have similar voting power in our company following the spin-off. Directly, through family trusts, and as voting trustee under a voting trust agreement, Dr. Felix Zandman, executive chairman and chief technical and business development officer of Vishay Intertechnology who will serve as an R&D consultant to our company, is expected to have sole or shared voting power over substantially all of the outstanding Class B common stock. The holders of Class B common stock will effectively be able to cause the election of directors and approve other actions as stockholders without the approval of other stockholders of our company, including the sale, merger, or other transactions involving our company. This may adversely affect the market value of our stock.
 
We may be reluctant to issue substantial additional shares in order not to dilute the interests of our existing stockholders, which could impede growth.
 
The strategy of the Vishay Intertechnology measurements business has included a strong focus on acquisitions. Historically, these acquisitions were financed with Vishay Intertechnology’s cash on hand. One of the factors that the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology considered in approving the spin-off was our ability, as a stand-alone public company, to use shares of our common stock as currency for future acquisition activity. If acquisition opportunities were to arise in which it would be advisable to issue our shares, our board of directors would need to consider the potentially dilutive effect on the interests and voting power of our existing stockholders. Any reluctance to issue additional shares could impede our future growth.
 
Your percentage ownership of our common stock may be diluted in the future.
 
Your percentage ownership of our common stock may be diluted in the future because of equity awards that we expect will be granted to our directors, officers and employees. Prior to the record date for the distribution, we expect that Vishay Intertechnology will approve the Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program, which will provide for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and other equity-based awards to our directors, officers and other employees, advisors and consultants.
 
- 30 -
 


Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may reduce the likelihood of any unsolicited acquisition proposal or potential change of control that you might consider favorable.
 
Our bylaws contain provisions that could be considered “anti-takeover” provisions because they make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our incumbent board of directors. Under these by-law provisions:
These provisions could have the effect of discouraging an unsolicited acquisition proposal or delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be considered favorably by our stockholders.
 
- 31 -
 


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
 
Certain statements contained in or incorporated by reference into this document are “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by use of statements that include phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will” or other similar words or phrases. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are or may be forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. In particular, any statements regarding the benefits of the spin-off, as well as expectations with respect to future business performance, operating efficiencies and cost savings, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performance or achievements. Factors that might affect such forward-looking statements include, among other things:
These factors and the risk factors described in the previous section are those of which we are currently aware. However, they are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on our future results, performance or achievements. The forward-looking statements included in this document are made only as of the date of this document, and we do not have any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We cannot assure you that projected results or events reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur.
 
- 32 -
 


THE SPIN-OFF
 
Background
 
Vishay Intertechnology began its business as a manufacturer of foil resistors and foil resistance strain gages. Through a series of acquisitions over the course of 40 years, Vishay Intertechnology has transformed itself into primarily a manufacturer and supplier of discrete semiconductors and passive electronic components. At the same time, Vishay Intertechnology expanded its measurements business through acquisitions, moving the business from its initial focus on precision foil resistors and foil strain gages to include load cells, instrumentation and integrated measurement systems. Because the core components of the measurements business are foil strain gages—resistors that are sensitive to various forms of stress—Vishay Intertechnology included the measurements business in its Passive Components segment, along with other types of resistors, capacitors, and inductors.
 
In recent years, the measurements business has pursued a strategy of vertical integration, alongside its sales of strain gages and load cells. In vertically integrated production, strain gages are used to manufacture load cells, and the load cells, along with instrumentation and software, are integrated into load cell modules and complete measurement systems. The approach of vertical integration differs from the horizontal strategy of Vishay Intertechnology’s discrete semiconductor and passive component businesses, which is to offer a broad product line of components to equipment manufacturers, directly and through independent distribution channels.
 
Along with the divergence in strategy, management has concluded that the measurements business is not a core component of Vishay Intertechnology’s operations in terms of products, technology, manufacturing processes, markets and customers. In March 2009, management suggested to the Vishay Intertechnology board that the company consider a separation of the measurements business through a tax-free spin-off to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders. The board at the time authorized management to pursue consideration of a spin-off and also authorized the Strategic Affairs Committee of the Vishay Intertechnology board to advise with respect to the possibility of such a transaction. The Strategic Affairs Committee consists of three members of the Vishay Intertechnology board, each of whom qualifies as an independent director under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, and is separately represented by independent counsel.
 
Following board authorization, Vishay Intertechnology management began an intensive period of investigation of the business, tax and legal aspects of the spin-off, together with Vishay Intertechnology’s financial, accounting and legal advisors.
 
Since August 2009, J.P. Morgan has been acting as financial advisor to Vishay Intertechnology on the potential spin-off of Vishay Precision Group. Among other things, J.P. Morgan has assisted Vishay Intertechnology in reviewing and analyzing the financial aspects and potential capital markets implications of the potential spin-off.
 
After receiving management’s recommendation to proceed with the spin-off, the Strategic Affairs Committee conducted interviews with key members of management, held meetings with the company’s advisors and reviewed materials concerning the proposed spin-off. The Committee and its independent advisors and counsel also met on their own on multiple occasions to consider the recommendations of management and the company’s advisors and, based on these recommendations and its own investigation, determined to advise the full board in favor of the spin-off.
 
- 33 -
 


Upon the advice of the Strategic Affairs Committee, and after considering various alternatives (including the possible sale of the businesses), the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology authorized the announcement of the company’s intention to spin off its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses into an independent publicly traded company, with Vishay Intertechnology’s common stockholders receiving common stock of the spin-off company and Vishay Intertechnology’s Class B common stockholders receiving shares of Class B common stock of the spin-off company. The announcement was made on October 27, 2009. Since that time, the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology and its Strategic Affairs Committee have continued to monitor the progress of the spin-off, and based on the current existing circumstances, they continue to believe that the spin-off represents the best opportunity at the present time for Vishay Intertechnology stockholders to realize value from Vishay Intertechnology’s precision measurement and foil resistor businesses, as well as to enhance the focus of Vishay Intertechnology’s remaining core businesses.
 
The spin-off will be accomplished through the distribution of stock of our company to stockholders of record of Vishay Intertechnology as of the record date of June 25, 2010. The distribution will occur on the distribution date of July 6, 2010. On that date, each holder of Vishay Intertechnology common stock will receive 1 share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock held, and each holder of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock will receive 1 share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock held. The distribution is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, which are described in this information statement under “Conditions to the Spin-off.”
 
Following the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will cease to own any equity interest in our company, and we will be an independent, publicly traded company. No vote of Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders is required or being sought in connection with the spin-off, and Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders have no appraisal rights in connection with the spin-off.
 
- 34 -
 


Reasons for the Spin-off
 
Among other things, the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology considered the following potential benefits in making its determination to approve the spin-off. All of the listed positive factors were viewed as similarly significant in the Vishay Intertechnology board’s ultimate determination.
- 35 -
 


Neither we nor Vishay Intertechnology can assure you that, following the spin-off, any of these benefits will be realized to the extent anticipated or at all.
 
The board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology and its Strategic Affairs Committee, with the assistance of the company’s and the Committee’s advisors, considered various potential risks and other negative factors in determining whether to proceed with the spin-off. These included the loss by Vishay Intertechnology of our earnings and cash flow following the spin-off, the possibility that the anticipated value creation for stockholders as a result of the spin-off would not materialize, the possible negative effects of the spin-off on the credit ratings of Vishay Intertechnology, the possible negative market reaction to our dual-class capital structure, the possibility that as a significantly smaller company than Vishay Intertechnology our economic viability and the market for our shares could be compromised, the risk that our management would not be able to execute our business plan so as to achieve the anticipated benefits of the spin-off and the risk that general business, economic and market conditions would similarly interfere with the realization of the operational and strategic advantages that we expect to achieve as an independent public company. The Vishay Intertechnology board of directors concluded that the potential benefits of the spin-off outweighed these negative factors.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology board also considered alternatives to the spin-off transaction, including a possible sale of the precision measurement and foil resistor businesses. The Vishay Intertechnology board concluded that, in the current economic and business climate, none of the alternatives was likely to create value for stockholders equal to the anticipated benefits of the spin-off. The Vishay Intertechnology board also determined that it was advisable not to delay or defer consummation of the spin-off. With the acquisitions consummated in the last several years having been fully assimilated, our company now has the elements necessary to operate on a stand-alone basis as a vertically integrated producer of precision measurement products.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology board also considered the risk that the combined trading prices of our common stock and Vishay Intertechnology common stock after the spin-off may be lower than the trading price for Vishay Intertechnology common stock prior to the spin-off. The Vishay Intertechnology board of directors concluded that the potential benefits of the spin-off outweighed this risk.
 
- 36 -
 


In view of the wide variety of complex factors that it took into account, the Vishay Intertechnology board did not attempt to quantify, rank or assign relative weights to the factors that it considered in determining to proceed with the spin-off.
 
Manner of Effecting the Spin-off
 
On the distribution date, Vishay Intertechnology will effect the spin-off by distributing to holders of record of its common stock (or their designees) as of the record date a dividend of 1 share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock held by them on the record date and not subsequently sold in the “regular way” market. Holders of record of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock as of the record date will receive a dividend of 1 share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock held by them.
 
Prior to the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will deliver all of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock to the distribution agent. On or about the distribution date, the distribution agent will effect delivery of the shares of our common stock issuable in the spin-off through the transfer agent’s book-entry registration system by mailing to each record holder a statement of holdings detailing the record holder’s ownership interest in our company and the method by which the record holder may access its account and, if desired, trade its shares of our common stock.
 
Many Vishay Intertechnology stockholders hold their Vishay Intertechnology common stock through a bank, brokerage firm, or other financial nominee. The nominee is said to hold the shares in “street name,” and the stockholder’s beneficial ownership of the shares is recorded on the books and records of the nominee. If you hold your Vishay Intertechnology shares through a nominee, your nominee will credit your account with the Vishay Precision Group common stock that you are entitled to receive in the spinoff. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having your shares of Vishay Precision Group common stock held in “street name,” you should contact your nominee.
 
Please note that if any stockholder of Vishay Intertechnology on the record date sells shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock after the record date but on or before the distribution date in the “regular-way” market, the buyer of those shares, and not the seller, will become entitled to receive the shares of our common stock issuable in respect of the shares sold. See “—Trading of Vishay Intertechnology Common Stock Between the Record Date and the Distribution Date” below for more information.
 
Vishay Intertechnology will deliver shares of our Class B common stock directly to the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock.
 
You are not being asked to take any action in connection with the spin-off. You also are not being asked for a proxy or to surrender any of your shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock for shares of our common stock. The number of outstanding shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock will not change as a result of the spin-off, although the value of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock may be affected.
 
- 37 -
 


Warrants
 
In connection with an acquisition, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued Class A warrants to acquire 7,000,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $20.00 per share and Class B warrants to acquire 1,823,529 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $30.30 per share. With the exception of the exercise price, the Class A warrants and the Class B warrants have identical terms and provisions.  Under the terms of these warrants, on the date of the spin-off, each holder of an outstanding and unexercised warrant is entitled to a warrant evidencing a right to purchase a number of shares of our capital stock that the holder would have received had the holder exercised the Vishay Intertechnology warrants immediately prior to the record date for the spin-off.  The terms of the warrants to acquire our common stock will be the same as the terms of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants, except that the exercise price will be determined ten trading days after the spin-off based upon a formula included in the warrant agreement, described on page 153.  Additional information regarding the warrants to be issued is included in Description of our Capital Stock  Warrants” beginning on page 153.
 
Exchangeable Notes

In connection with the same acquisition in which Vishay Intertechnology issued its warrants, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or principal) amount of its floating rate unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102.  The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay Intertechnology on December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of December 13, 2002.  The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange for shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called by Vishay Intertechnology for similar consideration.  The put/call rate is currently $17.00 of nominal amount of the notes per share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock.
 
Under the terms of the put and call agreement, by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is required to take action, and cause us to take action, so that the existing notes are deemed exchanged as of the date of the spin-off, for a combination of new notes of Vishay Intertechnology and notes issued by us.  The exact amount of the liability to be assumed by us under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.
 
The terms of the new Vishay Intertechnology notes and our notes will be identical to the terms of the existing notes, except for adjustments to the put/call rate, the nominal amounts of the notes and certain other stock price-dependent parameters, which will be based on formulae included in the note instrument and the put and call agreement.
 
We expect that the liability we assume for Vishay Intertechnology’s exchangeable notes will be approximately $13 million, however, the exact amount of the liability under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.  See note (h) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54 for additional information, including how the amount of liability that we expect to assume was estimated.
 
Additional information is included in “Description of Certain Indebtedness” beginning on page 159.
 
Treatment of Fractional Shares
 
Fractional shares of our common stock will not be issued to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders as part of the distribution nor credited to book-entry accounts. Instead, the distribution agent will aggregate all of the fractional shares and sell them in the open market at then-prevailing prices and distribute the aggregate net cash proceeds from the sale, within three business days after such sale,  to each stockholder who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fractional share of common stock in the distribution, based upon the fractional share that such holder would have been entitled to receive, after making appropriate deductions for any required withholdings for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-off” for a discussion of the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the proceeds received from the sale of fractional shares. We will bear the cost of brokerage fees incurred in connection with these sales. We anticipate that these sales will occur within one to two business days, and these sales are required to be completed within one week after the date of the spin-off. No interest will be paid from the distribution date. None of Vishay Intertechnology, us or the distribution agent will guarantee any minimum sale price for the fractional shares. The distribution agent will have the sole discretion to select the broker-dealer(s) through which to sell the shares and to determine when, how and at what price to sell the shares. Further, neither the distribution agent nor the selected broker-dealer(s) will be our affiliate or an affiliate of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Fractional shares of our Class B common stock will not be issued. Instead, Vishay Intertechnology will pay each stockholder who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fractional share of Class B common stock in the distribution an amount in cash that such stockholder would have received from the distribution agent had such fractional share been a fractional share of common stock.
 
- 38 -
 


Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-off
 
The following discussion summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the spin-offs of our common stock to a U.S. holder (as defined below) of Vishay Intertechnology that holds such stock as a capital asset for tax purposes. This discussion is based upon the Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, which we refer to as the Treasury Regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions as in effect as of the date of this prospectus, all of which may change, possibly with retroactive effect. For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of Vishay Intertechnology stock is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
This summary is of a general nature and does not purport to deal with all tax considerations that may be relevant to a holder in light of that holder’s particular circumstances or to a holder subject to special rules, such as:
If a partnership holds the shares of Vishay Intertechnology stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding shares of Vishay Intertechnology stock should consult its tax advisor.
 
This discussion of material U.S. federal income tax consequences is not a complete analysis or description of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences of the transaction and does not constitute tax advice. This discussion does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances. In addition, it does not address any non-income tax or any foreign, state or local tax consequences of the transaction. Accordingly, we strongly urge each holder to consult his or her own tax advisor to determine the particular U.S. federal, state or local or foreign income or other tax consequences to him or her of the transaction.
 
- 39 -
 


General
 
Vishay Intertechnology has received a private letter ruling from the IRS that concludes, based upon the facts, representations, assumptions and undertakings in the ruling, that the spinoff will qualify for tax-free treatment to Vishay Intertechnology and its stockholders under Section 355 and related provisions of the Code.
 
The IRS ruling does not address all of the issues that are relevant to determining whether the spin-off will qualify for tax-free treatment. The issues not addressed by the ruling consist primarily of issues on which the IRS customarily declines to rule. It is, however, also a condition to closing that Vishay Intertechnology receive an opinion from its special tax counsel, Pepper Hamilton LLP, that the spin-off will generally qualify for tax-free treatment to you and Vishay Intertechnology for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The opinion is expected to address those issues that are not addressed by the IRS ruling.
 
As a result of such tax-free treatment:
Although a private letter ruling is generally binding on the IRS with respect to the party for which it was obtained, if the facts, representations, assumptions or undertakings set forth in the ruling request are incorrect or violated in any material respect, the ruling may be retroactively modified or revoked by the IRS. An opinion of counsel represents counsel’s best legal judgment but is not binding on the IRS or any court.
 
If the spin-off were not to qualify as a tax-free transaction, Vishay Intertechnology would have taxable gain equal to the excess of the fair market value of our stock and its tax basis therein. In addition, if the spin-off were not to qualify as a tax-free transaction, a U.S. holder would be treated as receiving a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of our stock received in the spin-off, which would be taxed (i) as a dividend to the extent of the holder’s pro rata share of Vishay Intertechnology’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (including the gain to Vishay Intertechnology triggered by the spin-off), then (ii) as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the holder’s tax basis in Vishay Intertechnology’s stock with respect to which the distribution was made, and finally (iii) as capital gain with respect to the remaining value.
 
- 40 -
 


Even if the spin-off otherwise constitutes a tax-free transaction to you under Section 355, and related provisions of the Code, it would be taxable to Vishay Intertechnology if we engage in or enter into an agreement to engage in a plan of series of related transactions that would result in 50% or greater change (by vote or by value) in our stock ownership during the four-year period beginning on the date that begins two years before the spin-off, unless it is established that the transaction is not pursuant to a plan related to the spin-off. United States Treasury Regulations generally provide that whether an acquisition of our stock and a spin-off are part of a plan is determined based on all of the facts and circumstances, including specific factors listed in the regulations. In addition, the regulations provide certain “safe harbors” for acquisitions of our stock that are not considered to be part of a plan related to the spin-off.
 
There are other restrictions imposed on us under current U.S. federal tax law for spin-offs and with which we will need to comply in order to preserve the favorable tax treatment of the distribution, such as limitations on sales or redemptions of our capital stock for cash or other property following the distribution.
 
In the tax matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology, we will agree that, among other things, we will not take any actions that would result in any tax being imposed on the spin-off. Please see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology – Tax Matters Agreement” for more detail.
 
Treasury Regulations under Section 355 of the Code require that Vishay Intertechnology stockholders who own 5% or more, by vote or value, of the outstanding stock of Vishay Intertechnology prior to the spin-off attach statements to their U.S. federal income tax returns for the taxable year in which the spin-off occurs that show the application of Section 355 of the Code to the receipt of our stock in the spin-off.  A holder of a Vishay Intertechnology exchangeable note due 2102 who receives an exchangeable note from us in the spin-off has similar reporting obligations if the holder had a tax basis in the Vishay Intertechnology exchangeable notes due 2102 of $1,000,000 or more before the spin-off.
 
Vishay Intertechnology will make available to the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders who may be subject to this requirement any information known to Vishay Intertechnology and that is necessary to comply with this requirement.
 
Results of the Spin-off
 
After the spin-off, we will be an independent public company owning and operating what had previously been Vishay Intertechnology’s precision measurement and foil resistor businesses. Immediately following the spin-off, we expect to have outstanding approximately 12.3 million shares of our common stock and approximately 1,500 holders of record of shares of our common stock, based upon the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock outstanding and the number of record holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the date of this information statement. We also expect to have outstanding 1.0 million shares of our Class B common stock and 13 holders of record of our Class B common stock, based upon the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock and the number of holders of record of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock on the date of this information statement.
 
The spin-off will not affect the number of outstanding Vishay Intertechnology shares or any rights of Vishay Intertechnology stockholders, although it may affect the market value of the outstanding Vishay Intertechnology common stock. After the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology common stock will continue to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VSH.”
 
- 41 -
 


All of our capital stock is currently owned by Vishay Intertechnology. There currently is no trading market for our common stock. We have applied for listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange and anticipate that it will trade on this exchange following the spin-off under the symbol “VPG.” We expect that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop for our common stock on or shortly before the record date for the distribution. If trading begins on a “when-issued” basis, you may purchase or sell shares of our common stock up to and including the distribution date, but your transaction will not settle until after the distribution date. We expect regular way trading of our common stock will begin on the first trading day after the completion of the spin-off. “Regular way” trading refers to trades that are settled through the regular settlement cycle, typically for securities such as our common stock on the third full trading day following the trade date. Neither we nor Vishay Intertechnology can assure you as to the trading price of our common stock after the spin-off or whether the combined trading prices of our common stock and Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock after the spinoff will be less than, equal to or greater than the trading prices of Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock prior to the spin-off. The trading price of our common stock is likely to fluctuate significantly, particularly until an orderly market develops. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Spin-off.”
 
The shares of our common stock distributed to Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders will be freely transferable, except for shares received by individuals who are our affiliates. Individuals who may be considered our affiliates after the spin-off include individuals who control, are controlled by or are under common control with us, as those terms generally are interpreted for federal securities law purposes. This may include some or all of our executive officers and directors. Individuals who are our affiliates will be permitted to sell their shares of common stock received in the spin-off only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, an appropriate exemption from registration, including pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
 
Rule 144 will generally be available for the resale of our common stock by affiliates once 90 days have elapsed from the date we become subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which is the date when the registration statement of which this information statement forms a part becomes effective. Under Rule 144, provided certain conditions are satisfied, an affiliate may sell, within any three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to provisions relating to notice, manner of sale, and the availability of current public information about us. Vishay Intertechnology currently owns all of our outstanding shares of common stock. Upon completion of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will not beneficially own any shares of our common stock. None of our directors or executive officers currently owns any shares of our common stock, but those who own shares of Vishay Intertechnology will be treated the same as other holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock in any distribution by Vishay Intertechnology and, accordingly, will receive shares of our common stock in the distribution. As of the distribution date, based on their holdings of Vishay Intertechnology common stock as of the date of this information statement, we estimate that our executive officers and directors will collectively hold 8,978 shares of our common stock that may be sold under Rule 144.
 
Our Class B common stock generally will not be transferable except in certain very limited instances, and we do not anticipate a market for the Class B common stock.
 
- 42 -
 


Our Relationship with Vishay Intertechnology following the Spin-off
 
Prior to the spin-off, we will enter into a master separation agreement with Vishay Intertechnology that will include the detailed terms of the spin-off and will provide a framework for the relationship between Vishay Intertechnology and us following the spin-off. Among other things, this agreement will allocate assets, liabilities and obligations between Vishay Intertechnology and us, will require cooperation between the parties to fulfill the terms of the spin-off and will specify the conditions to the spin-off. The parties will also enter into various ancillary agreements, including a tax matters agreement, a license agreement pursuant to which we will be licensing the Vishay mark from Vishay Intertechnology, an agreement providing for treatment of our employees and their benefits, certain real property leases, transition services agreements, supply agreements and certain other agreements.
 
For a more detailed description of these agreements, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology.”
 
Conditions to the Spin-off
 
We expect that the spin-off will be effective on July 6, 2010. As provided in the master separation agreement, the spin-off is subject to the satisfaction or, if permitted under the agreement, the waiver, of the following conditions:
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission having allowed our registration statement on Form 10, of which this information statement forms a part, to become effective, no stop order relating to the registration statement being in effect and this information statement having been mailed to stockholders of Vishay Intertechnology.
     
     
  • A private letter ruling having been received from the Internal Revenue Service confirming that distribution of our stock will be tax-free to Vishay Intertechnology and the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This private letter ruling has been received.
     
  • Vishay Intertechnology having received the opinion of Pepper Hamilton LLP confirming that the distribution of our stock will be tax-free to Vishay Intertechnology and the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
     
  • Vishay Intertechnology having received a ruling from the Israeli taxing authorities that the transfer of the Israeli companies into Vishay Precision Group will not give rise to a material amount of current Israeli tax. This ruling has been received.
     
  • The listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange having been approved, subject to official notice of issuance.
     
  • No order, injunction or decree having been issued by any court of competent jurisdiction preventing consummation of the spin-off or any of the other transactions contemplated by the master separation agreement or any of the related agreements.
     
  • Having received all  governmental approvals and other consents necessary to consummate the distribution, except where the failure to obtain such approvals or consents would not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the parties to complete the spin-off or on the business, assets, liabilities, condition or results of operations of VPG, Vishay Intertechnology, or its respective subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Other than as specifically described in the first, second, fourth, and fifth bullet points above, we are not aware that any governmental approvals or other consents are necessary to consummate the distribution.
 
The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions will not create any obligation on Vishay Intertechnology’s part to effect the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology has the right not to complete the spin-off if, at any time, Vishay Intertechnology’s board of directors determines, in its sole discretion, that the spin-off is not in the best interests of Vishay Intertechnology or its stockholders or that market conditions are such that it is not advisable to separate us from Vishay Intertechnology.
 
- 43 -
 


Trading of Vishay Intertechnology Common Stock Between the Record Date and Distribution Date
 
Shortly before the record date for the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock will begin to trade in two markets on the New York Stock Exchange: a “regular way” market and an “ex-distribution” market. Between this time and the consummation of the spin-off, shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock that are sold on the regular way market will include an entitlement to receive shares of our common stock distributable in the spin-off. Conversely, shares sold in the “ex-distribution” market will not include an entitlement to receive shares of our common stock distributable in the spin-off, as the entitlement will remain with the original holder. Therefore, if you own shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the record date and thereafter sell those shares in the regular way market on or prior to the distribution date, you also will be selling the shares of our common stock that would have been distributed to you in the spinoff with respect to the shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock you sell. If you own shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the record date and thereafter sell those shares in the “ex-distribution” market on or prior to the distribution date, you will still receive the shares of our common stock in the spin-off. On the first trading day following the distribution date, shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock will begin regular way trading without any entitlement to receive shares of our common stock.
 
Material Changes to the Terms of the Spin-off
 
Whether or not the conditions to the spin-off are satisfied, until the distribution date, the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology retains the discretion to abandon the spin-off or to modify its terms, including the record date and the distribution date. If the Vishay Intertechnology board determines to abandon the spin-off or make any material changes to the terms of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will notify Vishay Intertechnology stockholders in a manner reasonably calculated to inform them about the modification as may be required by law, by, for example, publishing a press release, filing a current report on Form 8-K, or circulating a supplement to this information statement.
 
Reasons for Furnishing this Information Statement
 
This information statement is being furnished solely to provide information about us and about the spin-off to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders who will receive shares of our common stock in the spin-off. It is not and should not be construed as an inducement or encouragement to buy or sell any of our securities or any securities of Vishay Intertechnology. We believe that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this information statement may occur after that date, and neither we nor Vishay Intertechnology undertake any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of our respective public disclosure obligations and practices.
 
DIVIDEND POLICY
 
We do not expect to pay regular cash dividends during the period following the spin-off, and we may be precluded from doing so under the terms of our anticipated revolving credit facility.
 
Subject to any restrictions under our anticipated credit facility, the declaration of any future dividends and, if declared, the amount of any such dividends, will be subject to our actual future earnings, capital requirements, regulatory restrictions, debt covenants, other contractual restrictions and to the discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions, our financial condition and results of operations, our capital requirements, our prospects and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.
 
- 44 -
 


CAPITALIZATION
 
The following table sets forth our capitalization on a historical basis as of April 3, 2010, and pro forma to give effect to the spin-off and as adjusted to give effect to the repayment of intercompany indebtedness to Vishay Intertechnology.
 
This table should be read in conjunction with “Selected Historical Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements” and our unaudited interim condensed combined and consolidated financial statements and corresponding notes included elsewhere in this information statement. (in thousands)
 
April 3, 2010
  Actual   Pro Forma (a)
Third-party debt, including current and long-term              
       Revolving credit facility $ -   $ -
       Third-party debt held by Japanese subsidiary   1,621     1,621
       Exchangeable notes due 2102 (b)   -     13,000
       Notes payable to banks   -     -
              Total third-party debt   1,621     14,621
       Net payable to affiliates (c)   33,443     -
       Parent net investment / Paid-in capital   162,710     175,853
              Total capitalization $       197,774   $       190,474

     (a)     
Assumes that the spin-off occurred as of April 3, 2010.
 
(b)
We will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology's outstanding exchangeable notes due 2102, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation. The capitalization table shows an approximation based on Vishay Intertechnology estimates. However, the exact amount of the liability under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.  See note (h) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54 for additional information, including how the amount of liability that we expect to assume was estimated.
 
(c) Net payable to affiliates represents amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology subsidiaries excluding Vishay Precision Group and its subsidiaries. The net payable to affiliates will be settled at or prior to the spin-off date.
 
- 45 -
 


SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following table presents our selected historical financial data.
 
The statements of operations data for each of the years in the three years ended December 31, 2009 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been derived from our audited combined and consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
The statements of operations data for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, and the balance sheet data as of April 3, 2010 have been derived from our unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
The financial data as of March 28, 2009, December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from our unaudited financial statements not included in this information statement .
 
Our historical financial data are not necessarily indicative of our future performance or what our financial position and results of operations would have been if we had operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods shown. The data should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
- 46 -
 


in thousands, except per share As of and for the years ended December 31, As of and for the fiscal quarter ended
2009    2008 (b)      2007 (c)      2006    2005 (d)   April 3, 2010   March 28, 2009  
Statement of Operations Data:   
Net revenues 171,991   241,700   239,036 206,757 174,892 $   48,175 $ 43,705  
Costs of products sold 119,286 161,804 154,525 128,227   112,597 31,127 29,654
Gross profit 52,705 79,896 84,511 78,530 62,295 17,048 14,051
 
Selling, general, and
       administrative expenses
43,356 51,714 48,017   44,510 42,933 13,207 11,024
Restructuring and severance costs 2,048 6,349 356 1,619 3,157 - 479  
Impairment of goodwill - 93,465 - - - - -
Operating income (loss) 7,301 (71,632 ) 36,138 32,401 16,205 3,841   2,548
 
Other income (expense):
       Interest expense (1,237 ) (1,574 ) (2,294 ) (2,946 ) (2,220 ) (207 ) (377 )
       Other 714 4,780 2,788 1,012 (547 ) (4 ) 176
       Other income (expense) - net (523 ) 3,206 494 (1,934 ) (2,767 ) (211 ) (201 )
 
Income (loss) before taxes 6,778 (68,426 ) 36,632 30,467 13,438 3,630 2,347
 
Income tax expense 5,057 5,689 8,829 7,663 3,494 1,827 1,751
 
Net earnings (loss) 1,721 (74,115 ) 27,803 22,804   9,944 1,803 596
Less: net earnings
       attributable to noncontrolling
       interests
17 15 111 56 - 27 7
Net earnings (loss) attributable
       to Parent (a)
$ 1,704 $ (74,130 ) $ 27,692 $ 22,748 $ 9,944 $ 1,776 $ 589
   
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 63,192 $ 70,381 $ 56,803 $ 30,138 $ 19,633 $ 80,421 $ 73,287
Total assets 209,779 254,863 319,981 250,411 227,279 229,880 247,673
Net payable to affiliates 18,495 47,436 29,477 38,658 43,329 33,443 47,656
Long-term debt, less
       current portion
1,551 1,761 2,237 3,262 6,458 1,525 1,549
Working capital 102,489 145,363 127,667 92,401 76,993 105,992 146,243
Total Parent equity 148,090 150,158 229,420 154,116 130,273 150,479 148,365
 
- 47 -
 


(a)   This table does not include any earnings (loss) per share data. We were incorporated in August 2009 and during subsequent periods, the subsidiaries and operations comprising our business were wholly owned by various subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology. As a result, our capital structure was not comparable to the capital structure that we will have following the spin-off, and the presentation of earnings (loss) per share for historical periods would not be meaningful. For unaudited pro forma earnings (loss) per share data, see “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this information statement.
     
(b) Includes the results of Vishay Transducers India Limited from June 30, 2008 and of Powertron GmbH from July 23, 2008, the respective dates of acquisition.
 
(c) Includes the results of PM Group from April 19, 2007, the date of acquisition.
 
(d) Includes the results of SI Technologies from April 28, 2005 and Alpha Electronics K.K. from November 30, 2005, the respective dates of acquisition.
 
- 48 -
 


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated financial statements consist of unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 and an unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated balance sheet as of April 3, 2010. The unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and our combined and consolidated financial statements and our unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements and the corresponding notes included elsewhere in this information statement.
 
The unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated financial statements included in this information statement have been derived from our historical financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement and do not necessarily reflect what our financial position and results of operations would have been if we had operated as a separate stand-alone entity during the periods shown.
 
The unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated statements of operations reflect our combined and consolidated results as if the spin-off and related transactions described below had occurred as of January 1, 2009, the beginning of the most recent year for which audited financial statements are available. The unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated balance sheet reflects our combined and consolidated results as if the spin-off and related transactions described below had occurred as of April 3, 2010.
 
The pro forma adjustments give effect to the following transactions:
  • Cash contribution effective as of the spin-off date to achieve the target net cash balance pursuant to the master separation agreement.
  • The cash settlement of net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology, and related effects on interest expense and interest income. These net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology are expected to be repaid at or prior to the spin-off.
  • The distribution of 12.3 million shares of our common stock and 1.0 million shares of our Class B common stock to holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock.
  • Estimated incremental costs associated with operating as a stand-alone company.
Our unaudited pro forma combined and consolidated statements of operations do not give effect to initial expenses directly attributable to the spin-off because of their non-recurring nature. A significant portion of these non-recurring charges to effect the separation will be incurred by Vishay Intertechnology, such as investment banker fees, outside legal and accounting fees relating to the spin-off, costs to separate information systems and temporary consulting costs. The only significant non-recurring transaction borne by us is Mr. Shoshani’s sign-on bonus described in Executive Compensation  2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision Group – Employment Terms – Ziv Shoshani  Special Bonuses.” We will incur costs that have a future benefit to our company such as recruiting and relocation expenses associated with hiring key management positions new to our company and other employee compensation expenses. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology.”
 
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that management believes are reasonable based on our current plans and expectations; however, such adjustments are subject to change based on the finalization of the terms of the spin-off.
 
- 49 -
 


Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2009
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Pro Forma
        Historical         Adjustments         Pro Forma
Net revenues $      171,991 $      171,991
Costs of products sold 119,286 119,286
Gross profit 52,705 52,705
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses 43,356 4,600 (a) 47,956
Restructuring and severance costs 2,048 2,048
Operating income 7,301 (4,600 ) 2,701
 
Other income (expense):
       Interest expense (1,237 ) 868 (b) (369 )
       Other 714 100 (c) 814
       Other income (expense) - net (523 ) 968 445
 
Income before taxes 6,778 (3,632 ) 3,146
 
Income tax expense 5,057 (1,271 ) (d) 3,786
 
Net earnings (loss) 1,721 (2,361 ) (640 )
Less: net earnings (loss) attributable to
       noncontrolling interests 17 17
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Parent $ 1,704 $      (2,361 ) $ (657 )
 
Unaudited pro forma earnings per share:
       Basic (e)                     $ (0.05 )
       Diluted (e)                     $ (0.05 )
 
Wt. avg. shares used in calculated earnings per share:
       Basic (e)                       13,300  
       Diluted (e)                       13,300

See accompanying notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
- 50 -
 


  Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Statement of Operations
Fiscal Quarter Ended April 3, 2010
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Pro Forma          
  Historical       Adjustments         Pro Forma
Net revenues $ 48,175               $        48,175  
Costs of products sold   31,127                 31,127  
Gross profit   17,048                 17,048  
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses   13,207       590   (a)     13,797  
Restructuring and severance costs   -                 -  
Operating income   3,841       (590 )       3,251  
 
Other income (expense):                        
       Interest expense   (207 )     108   (b)     (99 )
       Other   (4 )     (20 ) (c)     (24 )
       Other income (expense) - net   (211 )     88         (123 )
 
Income before taxes   3,630       (502 )       3,128  
 
Income tax expense   1,827       (176 ) (d)     1,651  
 
Net earnings (loss)   1,803       (326 )       1,477  
Less: net earnings (loss) attributable to                        
       noncontrolling interests   27                 27  
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Parent $        1,776     $        (326 )     $ 1,450  
 
Unaudited pro forma earnings per share:                        
       Basic (e)                   $ 0.11  
       Diluted (e)                   $ 0.11  
 
Wt. avg. shares used in calculated earnings per share:                    
       Basic (e)                     13,300  
       Diluted (e)                     13,700  
 
S ee accompanying notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
- 51 -
 


Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of April 3, 2010
(in thousands)
 
Pro Forma          
  Historical       Adjustments         Pro Forma
Assets                        
Current assets:                        
       Cash and cash equivalents $ 80,421     $ (7,300 )  (f), (g)   $ 73,121  
       Accounts receivable, net   25,212                 25,212  
       Net inventories   45,010                 45,010  
       Deferred income taxes   4,984                 4,984  
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets   5,333                 5,333  
Total current assets   160,960       (7,300 )       153,660  
 
Property and equipment, net   44,236                 44,236  
Intangible assets, net   16,244                 16,244  
Other assets   8,440                 8,440  
              Total assets $ 229,880     $ (7,300 )     $        222,580  
 
Liabilities and Equity                        
Current liabilities:                        
       Notes payable to banks $ -               $  -  
       Trade accounts payable   6,942                 6,942  
       Net payable to affiliates   33,443       (33,443 )  (f)     -  
       Payroll and related expenses   7,082                 7,082  
       Other accrued expenses   6,119                 6,119  
       Income taxes   1,286                 1,286  
       Current portion of long-term debt   96                 96  
Total current liabilities   54,968       (33,443 )       21,525  
 
Long-term debt, less current portion   1,525       13,000    (h)     14,525  
Deferred income taxes   5,985                 5,985  
Other liabilities   6,347                 6,347  
Accrued pension and other postretirement costs   10,442                 10,442  
Total liabilities   79,267       (20,443 )       58,824  
 
Commitments and contingencies                        
 
Equity:                        
       Common stock           1,230    (i)     1,230  
       Class B common stock           100    (i)     100  
       Paid-in capital in excess of par           174,523    (i)     174,523  
       Parent net investment   162,710              (162,710 )  (i), (g), (h)     -  
       Accumulated other comprehensive income   (12,231 )               (12,231 )
       Total stockholders equity   150,479       13,143         163,622  
Noncontrolling interests   134                 134  
Total equity   150,613       13,143         163,756  
Total liabilities and equity $        229,880     $ (7,300 )     $ 222,580

See accompanying notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
- 52 -
 


Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements
 
(a)
R epresents the estimated incremental costs associated with operating as a stand-alone company ($6,400,000 and $1,150,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010, respectively, partially offset by the elimination of related corporate overhead allocated by Vishay Intertechnology of $1,800,000 and $560,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010, respectively, resulting in adjustments to our unaudited pro forma combined statements of income of $4,600,000 and $590,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010, respectively).
 
The estimated costs associated with operating as a stand-alone company for the year ended December 31, 2009 include:
                     
(1) $3,500,000 related to staff additions and increases in salaries to replace Vishay Intertechnology support and to function as an independent, publicly traded company, which were calculated based on approved headcounts, expected compensation plans and current market compensation assumptions;
 
(2) $1,900,000 related to corporate governance, including board of directors compensation and expenses, insurance costs, audit fees, annual report and proxy printing and filing fees, stock exchange fees, corporate compliance fees, and tax advisory fees, which were estimated using Vishay Intertechnology historical costs, and adjusted for expected variations as applicable, or, in the case of insurance costs, from insurance premium cost projections received from our insurance broker based on current market conditions;
 
(3) $200,000 related to increased rent expense based on the terms of new executed lease agreements and anticipated lease agreements to be entered into with Vishay Intertechnology;
 
(4) $100,000 related to increased depreciation, amortization and maintenance costs in connection with information technology infrastructure investments resulting from the spin-off, which were calculated from a plan approved by management using vendor quotes as a basis;
 
(5) $100,000 related to the administration of our benefit plans and payroll functions, which were estimated based upon written quotes received from potential providers; and
 
(6) $600,000 related to equity-based compensation that we plan to issue to certain employees and directors of our company after the spin-off , which was estimated based on compensation arrangements for our executive officers that were approved by the Vishay Intertechnology board of directors.
 
The estimated costs associated with operating as a stand-alone company for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 include:
 
(1)       $425,000 related to staff additions and increases in salaries to replace Vishay Intertechnology support and to function as an independent, publicly-traded company, which were calculated based on approved headcounts, expected compensation plans and current market compensation assumptions. Some of the staff additions contemplated in the pro forma adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2009 occurred during the first quarter of 2010, and as such, the annualized adjustment for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 is less than the adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2009;
 
(2)   $475,000 related to corporate governance, including board of directors compensation and expenses, insurance costs, audit fees, annual report and proxy printing and filing fees, stock exchange fees, corporate compliance fees, and tax advisory fees, which were estimated using Vishay Intertechnology historical costs, and adjusted for expected variations as applicable, or, in the case of insurance costs, from insurance premium cost projections received from our insurance broker based on current market conditions;
 
(3)   $50,000 related to increased rent expense based on the terms of new executed lease agreements and anticipated lease agreements to be entered into with Vishay Intertechnology;
 
(4)   $25,000 related to increased depreciation, amortization and maintenance costs in connection with information technology infrastructure investments resulting from the spin-off, which were calculated from a plan approved by management using vendor quotes as a basis;
 
(5)   $25,000 related to the administration of our benefit plans and payroll functions, which were estimated based upon written quotes received from potential providers; and
 
(6)   $150,000 related to equity-based compensation that we plan to issue to certain employees and directors of our company after the spin-off, which was estimated based on compensation arrangements for our executive officers approved by the Vishay Intertechnology board of directors.
     
The information provided in the pro forma adjustment described in this footnote is forward-looking information based on our current plans and expectations and is subject to uncertainties that could cause actual amounts to differ materially from those anticipated. See “Forward-Looking Information” on page 32 for further information.
 
- 53 -
 


(b)      Reflects net decreases in interest expense of $868,000 and $108,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010, respectively. Adjustments of $300,000 and $75,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010, respectively, are attributable to the allocation of a portion of the principal amount of the exchangeable notes due 2102 of Vishay Intertechnology (at LIBOR, as stated in the note instrument), in accordance with the terms of that instrument plus commitment fees associated with the revolving credit facility we expect to enter shortly after the separation, based on draft term sheets provided by a consortium of banks. The revolving credit facility is directly related to the spin-off in that it is necessary to replace Vishay Intertechnology-based sources of back-up liquidity. These adjustments are offset by adjustments to eliminate interest on net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology of $1,168,000 and $183,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010, respectively. Interest on net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology are based on the prevailing rate under the Vishay Intertechnology revolving credit agreement (currently LIBOR plus 1.40%). These net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology are expected to be repaid at or prior to the spin-off pursuant to the master separation agreement.
 
(c)   Reflects an adjustment to interest income due to the pro forma adjustments to the cash balance. The adjustment assumes a weighted average interest rate of less than 1%, based on current rates earned at our banks.
 
(d)   Represents the tax effect of pro forma adjustments based on the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35.0% for United States transactions (which represent the majority of the pro forma adjustments), and the applicable international tax rate for the international portion of the pro forma adjustments.
     
(e)
The number of shares used to compute basic earnings per share is 13.3 million, which is the number of shares of our common stock and Class B common stock assumed to be outstanding on the spin-off date, based on the distribution ratio of 1 share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock outstanding and 1 share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock.
 
The number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share is based on the number of shares of our common stock used to compute basic earnings per share, plus the potential dilution that could occur if potentially dilutive securities were exercised or converted into common stock.
 
There will be no potentially dilutive securities outstanding on the distribution date; however, potentially dilutive securities will be outstanding shortly after the distribution date, and any resulting dilution could be significant. We have approved certain initial equity compensation awards to our executive officers and directors. We also will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology's outstanding exchangeable notes due 2102, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation, and we are required to issue warrants to purchase our common stock to holders of Vishay Intertechnology warrants.
 
For periods in which there was a pro forma net loss, all of these potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation because they would be anti-dilutive.  Additionally, the computation for each period excludes certain instruments that we expect to be anti-dilutive because they are anti-dilutive to Vishay Intertechnology, and their exercise prices will be based upon a formula that is largely driven by the Vishay Intertechnology exercise prices for the replaced Vishay Intertechnology instruments.  We expect that such anti-dilutive instruments will represent an additional 800,000 to 1,000,000 potential common shares.
          
(f) Represents the cash settlement of net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology pursuant to the master separation agreement. These net amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology are expected to be repaid at or prior to the spin-off.
 
(g) Represents cash contribution pursuant to the master separation agreement. Pursuant to the master separation agreement, the target net cash balance at the spin-off date is $65.0 million. “Net cash” for these purposes is defined as cash and cash equivalents less third-party indebtedness less notes payable to banks less the book value of the exchangeable notes allocated to us. Amounts greater than 110% of the target net cash balance ($71.5 million) will be distributed to Vishay Intertechnology in the form of a dividend effective as of the spin-off date; amounts less than 90% of the target net cash balance ($58.5 million) will be contributed to us by Vishay Intertechnology effective as of the spin-off date. The adjustment assumes a gross cash contribution by Vishay Intertechnology of $26.1 million as of the spin-off date, to arrive at the target pro forma net cash balance of $58.5 million.
 
(h) Represents allocation of a portion of the principal amount of the exchangeable notes due 2102 of Vishay Intertechnology, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation. The pro forma adjustment is an approximation based on Vishay Intertechnology management estimates. Based on discussions with financial consultants, Vishay Intertechnology management estimates that our relative market capitalization is between 10% and 15% of the total Vishay Intertechnology market capitalization.  This implies that we will be allocated between $10.5 million and $15.8 million of the exchangeable notes.  The pro forma adjustment represents the approximate mid-point of that range, rounded to the nearest whole million.
 
(i) Represents the reclassification of “Parent Net Investment” into “Common Stock,” “Class B Common Stock,” and “Paid-in capital in excess of par.”
 
- 54 -
 


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Overview
 
We are a designer, manufacturer and marketer of resistive foil technology products such as resistive sensors, weighing modules, and control systems for a wide variety of applications. Our business is currently part of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., and our assets and liabilities consist of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses. Following the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly traded company, and Vishay Intertechnology will not retain any ownership interest in us.
 
We operate in two product segments: Foil Technology Products, which include strain gages, ultra-precision foil resistors, and current sensors, and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, which include transducers/load cells, instruments, weighing modules, and complete systems for process control or onboard weighing applications.
 
Due to our primarily specialized products, our business historically has been relatively less influenced by macro economic factors. Nevertheless, we did experience significant impacts of the global economic recession beginning in the second quarter of 2008 and continuing into 2009.
 
Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $172.0 million, compared to net revenues of $241.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $239.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $1.7 million, compared to a net loss of $74.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and net earnings of $27.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009 were negatively impacted by pretax charges of $2.0 million for restructuring and severance costs.
 
The net loss realized in 2008 was primarily due to a noncash goodwill impairment charge of $93.5 million ($92.5 million after tax), and also due to pretax charges of $6.3 million for restructuring and severance costs.
 
Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2007 were negatively impacted by pretax charges of $0.4 million for restructuring and severance costs.
 
Our business historically has been a strong generator of cash flows from operations. Despite lower revenues and earnings, we continued to generate cash flows from operations during the deep economic recession experienced in 2008 and 2009.
 
I n the second half of 2009, we began to see signs of economic recovery, including sequential increases in quarterly revenues and gross margins which have continued into the first quarter of 2010.  Our book-to-bill ratio has been greater than one for three consecutive quarters, after five consecutive quarters of declining sales.  While revenue levels have not yet returned to pre-recession levels, we remain confident for the long-term prospects of our business.
 
Net revenues for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 were $48.2 million, versus $43.7 for the comparable prior year period.  Net earnings for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 were $1.8 million, versus $0.6 million for the comparable prior year period.  Net earnings for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009 were negatively impacted by pretax charges of $0.5 million for restructuring and severance costs.
 
- 55 -
 


Financial Metrics
 
We utilize several financial measures and metrics to evaluate the performance and assess the future direction of our business. These key financial measures and metrics include sales, gross profit margin, end-of-period backlog, the book-to-bill ratio, and inventory turnover.
 
Gross profit margin is computed as gross profit as a percentage of net revenues. Gross profit is generally net revenues less costs of products sold, but could also include certain other period costs. Gross profit margin is clearly a function of net revenues, but also reflects our cost-cutting programs and our ability to contain fixed costs.
 
End-of-period backlog is one indicator of potential future sales. We include in our backlog only open orders that have been released by the customer for shipment in the next twelve months. If demand falls below customers’ forecasts, or if customers do not control their inventory effectively, they may cancel or reschedule the shipments that are included in our backlog, in many instances without the payment of any penalty. Therefore, the backlog is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future periods.
 
Another important indicator of demand in our industry is the book-to-bill ratio, which is the ratio of the amount of product ordered during a period as compared with the product that we ship during that period. A book-to-bill ratio that is greater than one indicates that our backlog is building and that we potentially will generate increasing revenues in future periods. Conversely, a book-to-bill ratio that is less than one is an indicator of declining demand and may foretell declining sales.
 
We focus on our inventory turnover as a measure of how well we are managing our inventory. We define inventory turnover for a financial reporting period as our costs of products sold for the four fiscal quarters ending on the last day of the reporting period divided by our average inventory (computed using each quarter-end balance) for this same period. A higher level of inventory turnover reflects more efficient use of our capital.
 
The quarter-to-quarter trends in these financial metrics can also be an important indicator of the likely direction of our business. The following table shows net revenues, gross profit margin, the end-of-period backlog, the book-to-bill ratio, and the inventory turnover for our business as a whole during the five quarters beginning with the first quarter of 2009 and through the first quarter of 2010 (dollars in thousands) :
 
1st Quarter      2nd Quarter      3rd Quarter      4th Quarter      1st Quarter
  2009   2009   2009   2009   2010
Net revenues $       43,705     $       41,333     $       40,105     $       46,848     $       48,175  
                                       
Gross profit margin   32.1 %     26.6 %     31.6 %     32.0 %     35.4 %
                                       
End-of-period backlog $ 33,000     $ 27,500     $ 30,100     $ 32,700     $ 36,200  
                                       
Book-to-bill ratio   0.92       0.85       1.05       1.06       1.12  
                                       
Inventory turnover   2.04       2.17       2.11       2.60       2.71

See “Financial Metrics by Segment” below for net revenues, book-to-bill ratio, and gross profit margin broken out by segment.
 
Our revenues and operating results were significantly impacted by global economic recession experienced during 2008 and 2009. In the second half of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, we began to see signs of economic recovery, with increasing orders which should translate into increased revenues in future periods. Although we expect the current trend of revenues to continue, there is no assurance that revenue will increase going forward if the current economic recovery stalls or does not continue as expected.
 
- 56 -
 


Financial Metrics by Segment
 
The following table shows net revenues, book-to-bill ratio, and gross profit margin broken out by segment for the five quarters beginning with the first quarter of 2009 through the first quarter of 2010 (dollars in thousands) :
 
1st Quarter   2nd Quarter   3rd Quarter   4th Quarter   1st Quarter
  2009       2009       2009       2009       2010
Foil Technology Products                                      
Net revenues $ 19,268     $ 16,884     $ 16,018     $ 19,701     $ 23,897  
                                       
Book-to-bill ratio   0.92       0.84       1.14       1.24       1.16  
                                       
Gross profit margin   41.4 %     38.7 %     40.3 %     48.0 %     49.9 %
                                       
Weighing Modules and                                      
Control Systems                                      
Net revenues $      24,437     $      24,449     $      24,087     $      27,147     $      24,278  
                                       
Book-to-bill ratio   0.92       0.86       0.99       0.93       1.08  
                                       
Gross profit margin   24.8 %     18.2 %     25.8 %     20.4 %     21.1 %
 
- 57 -
 


Acquisition Strategy
 
Since 2002, we have implemented a strategy of vertical product integration, by growing our weighing systems business and by promoting our sophisticated electronic weighing modules and other products that integrate the precision measurement components that we design and produce.
 
As part of our growth strategy, we seek to expand through acquisition of other manufacturers of products that are similar or complementary to our existing product portfolio, particularly manufacturers who have established positions in major markets, reputations for product quality and reliability, and product lines with which we have substantial marketing and technical expertise. We also explore opportunities to acquire smaller targets to gain market share, effectively penetrate different geographic markets, enhance new product development, or grow our high margin niche market businesses.
 
We expect to continue our program of strategic acquisitions, particularly where opportunities present themselves to grow our systems business. Upon completion of acquisitions, we seek to reduce selling, general, and administrative expenses through the integration or elimination of redundant sales offices and administrative functions at acquired companies.
 
There is no assurance that we will be able to identify and acquire suitable acquisition candidates at price levels and on terms and conditions we consider acceptable.
 
Our acquisitions discussed here and elsewhere in this information statement were undertaken by Vishay Intertechnology, and form the core operations of our business.
 
2008 Activities
 
During 2008, we made two acquisitions. On June 30, 2008, we acquired Sanmar Group s 51% interest in Vishay Sanmar Limited, a transducers manufacturing joint venture in India for approximately $9.6 million, making the renamed Vishay Transducers India, Limited a wholly owned subsidiary. Sanmar Group is a major industrial company based in Chennai India, which has no affiliation with Vishay other than its former co-ownership of the joint venture. Vishay initially acquired its interest in this joint venture as part of the acquisition of Sensortronics in 2002. The transaction was funded using cash on-hand.
 
On July 23, 2008, we acquired Powertron GmbH, a manufacturer of specialty precision resistors, for approximately $14.7 million, including the repayment of certain debt of Powertron. The transaction was funded using cash provided by Vishay Intertechnology.
 
2007 Activities
 
On April 19, 2007, we declared our cash tender offer for all shares of PM Group PLC wholly unconditional, and assumed ownership of PM Group. PM Group is an advanced designer and manufacturer of systems used in the weighing and process control industries, located in the United Kingdom. The aggregate cash paid for all shares of PM Group was approximately $45.7 million. The transaction was funded using cash provided by Vishay Intertechnology. We immediately sold PM Group’s electrical contracting subsidiary for approximately $16.1 million.
 
Cost Management
 
To be successful, we must seek new strategies for controlling operating costs. Through automation in our plants, we can optimize our capital and labor resources in production, inventory management, quality control, and warehousing. We are in the process of moving some manufacturing from higher-labor-cost countries to state of the art new facilities, including a substantial amount of automation, in lower-labor-cost countries, such as Costa Rica, India, Israel, the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of China (Taiwan). This will enable us to become more efficient and cost competitive, but also maintain tighter controls of the operation.  The improved automation will assist us to continuously improve product quality and increased efficiency.
 
A primary tenet of our business strategy is expansion through acquisitions. In addition to the primary objective of enhancing our strategy of vertical product integration, our acquisition strategy includes a focus on reducing selling, general, and administrative expenses through the integration or elimination of redundant sales offices and administrative functions at acquired companies, and achieving significant production cost savings through the transfer of manufacturing operations to countries where we can benefit from lower labor costs and available tax and other government-sponsored incentives. These plant closure and employee termination costs subsequent to acquisitions are also integral to our cost reduction programs.
 
- 58 -
 


Under previous accounting standards, plant closure and employee termination costs that we incurred in connection with our acquisition activities were included in the costs of our acquisitions and did not affect earnings or losses on our statement of operations. ASC Topic 805, which we adopted effective January 1, 2009, requires such costs to be recorded as expenses in our statement of operations, as such expenses are incurred.
 
We evaluate potential restructuring projects based on an expected payback period. The payback period represents the number of years of annual cost savings necessary to recover the initial cash outlay for severance and other exit costs plus the noncash expenses recognized for asset write-downs. In general, a restructuring project must have a payback of less than 3 years to be considered beneficial. On average, our restructuring projects have a payback of between 1 and 1.5 years.
 
These production transfers, facility consolidations, and other long-term cost-cutting measures require us to initially incur significant severance and other exit costs. We anticipate that we will realize the benefits of our restructuring through lower labor costs and other operating expenses in future periods. However, these programs to improve our profitability also involve certain risks which could materially impact our future operating results, as further detailed in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16 of this information statement.
 
During 2007, we transferred significant load cell manufacturing operations from our City of Industry, California facility to existing facilities in the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and Israel. This resulted in a significant reduction in the number of employees in City of Industry, which today is principally a warehouse and distribution center with only minor manufacturing operations. We incurred $0.2 million of restructuring and severance costs associated with the downsizing of our City of Industry, California facility. We also incurred $0.1 million of other restructuring and severance costs during 2007.
 
As part of our acquisition of PM Group in 2007, we transferred certain manufacturing operations from Bradford, United Kingdom to the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan). The costs associated with these transfers, which aggregated $0.3 million, were included in the cost of acquisition of PM Group under then-applicable accounting standards.
 
During 2008, we announced the closure of our load cell manufacturing facility in Breda, the Netherlands, and transferred all manufacturing operations to Israel. We incurred $5.7 million of restructuring and severance costs associated with the closure of our Breda, the Netherlands facility.
 
In response to the economic downturn, during the latter half of 2008 and continuing into 2009, we undertook significant measures to cut costs. This included a temporary idling of manufacturing capacity to adapt to sellable volume and limiting the building of product for inventory. It also included permanent employee terminations, and temporary layoffs and shutdowns. We incurred restructuring and severance costs of $0.6 million and $2.0 million in 2008 and 2009, respectively, as a result of these programs in response to the global recession.
 
We did not initiate any new programs during the three fiscal months ended April 3, 2010 and thus did not record any restructuring expenses during the fiscal quarter.
 
We are presently evaluating plans to further reduce our costs by consolidating additional manufacturing operations by expanding our newly acquired facility in India. These plans will require us to incur restructuring and severance costs in future periods. However, after implementing these plans, we do not anticipate significant restructuring and severance costs for our business except in the context of acquisition integration.
 
While streamlining and reducing fixed overhead, we are exercising caution so that we will not negatively impact our customer service or our ability to further develop products and processes.
 
Israeli Government Incentives
 
We have substantial manufacturing operations in Israel, where we benefit from the government’s tax incentive and employment programs. These benefits take the form of reduced tax rates that are lower than those in the United States and government grants. These programs have contributed substantially, predominantly in prior years, to our growth and profitability.
 
The current benefits derived under these programs are not material to our consolidated results.  Because of our significant presence in Israel, the availability of these incentive programs could have a significant positive effect on us if we relocate manufacturing capacity or develop new product lines in Israel.  However, there are no current plans that would allow us to earn additional benefits.
 
- 59 -
 


Foreign Currency
 
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks, particularly due to transactions in currencies other than the functional currencies of certain subsidiaries. While we have in the past used forward exchange contracts to hedge a portion of our projected cash flows from these exposures, we generally have not done so in recent periods.
 
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) require that entities identify the “functional currency” of each of their subsidiaries and measure all elements of the financial statements in that functional currency. A subsidiary’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. In cases where a subsidiary is relatively self-contained within a particular country, the local currency is generally deemed to be the functional currency. However, a foreign subsidiary that is a direct and integral component or extension of the parent company’s operations generally would have the parent company’s currency as its functional currency. We have both situations among our subsidiaries.
 
Foreign Subsidiaries which use the Local Currency as the Functional Currency
 
We finance our operations in Europe and certain locations in Asia in local currencies, and accordingly, these subsidiaries utilize the local currency as their functional currency. For those subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets have been translated at the rate of exchange as of the balance sheet date. Translation adjustments do not impact the results of operations and are reported as a separate component of equity. With the general weakening of the U.S. dollar during 2007 and 2008, this translation of these subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars has resulted in a significant increase in the translation adjustment recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on our balance sheet. See Note 9 to our combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
For those subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the year. While the translation of revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars does not directly impact the consolidated statement of operations, the translation effectively increases or decreases the U.S. dollar equivalent of revenues generated and expenses incurred in those foreign currencies. As a result of the general weakening of the U.S. dollar versus several foreign currencies, the translation of foreign currency revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars significantly increased reported revenues and expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The dollar generally was stronger in the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the prior year, with the translation of foreign currency revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars decreasing reported revenues and expenses versus the comparable prior year periods. This was particularly evident in our transactions denominated in British pounds.
 
- 60 -
 


Foreign Subsidiaries which use the U.S. Dollar as the Functional Currency
 
Our operations in Israel and certain locations in Asia are largely financed in U.S. dollars, and accordingly, these subsidiaries utilize the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. For those foreign subsidiaries where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, all foreign currency financial statement amounts are remeasured into U.S. dollars. Exchange gains and losses arising from remeasurement of foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are included in the results of operations. While these subsidiaries transact most business in U.S. dollars, they may have significant costs, particularly payroll-related, which are incurred in the local currency. The cost of products sold and selling, general, and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 (compared to the prior year) have been significantly increased by local currency transactions of subsidiaries which use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, particularly our subsidiaries in Israel. The cost of products sold and selling, general, and administrative expense for year ended December 31, 2009 have been favorably impacted (compared to the prior year) by local currency transactions of subsidiaries which use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, particularly our subsidiaries in Israel. However, most of the favorable impact was realized during the first quarter of 2009.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
As of April 3, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 to our combined and consolidated financial statements. We identify here a number of policies that entail significant judgments or estimates.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
We recognize revenue on product sales during the period when the sales process is complete. This generally occurs when products are shipped to the customer in accordance with terms of an agreement of sale, title and risk of loss have been transferred, collectibility is reasonably assured, and pricing is fixed or determinable. For a small percentage of sales where title and risk of loss passes at point of delivery, we recognize revenue upon delivery to the customer, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
 
Some of our larger systems products have post-shipment obligations, such as customer acceptance, training, or installation. In such circumstances, revenue is deferred until the obligation has been completed unless such obligation is deemed inconsequential and perfunctory.
 
Given the specialized nature of our products, we generally do not allow product returns except for quality issues. Annual warranty expenses generally are not significant. Warranty expenses were less than $225,000 in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, and the accrued warranty at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $492,000 and $741,000, respectively.
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Our receivables represent a significant portion of our current assets. We are required to estimate the collectibility of our receivables and to establish allowances for the amount of receivables that will prove uncollectible. We base these allowances on our historical collection experience, the length of time our receivables are outstanding, the financial circumstances of individual customers, and general business and economic conditions.
 
- 61 -
 


Inventories
 
We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined under the first-in, first-out method and market based upon net realizable value. The valuation of our inventories requires our management to make market estimates. For work in process goods, we are required to estimate the cost to completion of the products and the prices at which we will be able to sell the products. For finished goods, we must assess the prices at which we believe the inventory can be sold. Inventories are also adjusted for estimated obsolescence and written down to net realizable value based upon estimates of future demand, technology developments and market conditions.
 
Estimates of Restructuring and Severance Costs and Purchase-Related Restructuring Costs
 
To maintain our cost competitiveness, we pursue a strategy to shift manufacturing emphasis to more advanced automation in higher-labor-cost regions and to relocate production to regions with skilled workforces and relatively lower labor costs. We also incur similar costs associated with acquired companies.
 
These production transfers, facility consolidations, and other long-term cost-cutting measures require us to initially incur significant severance and other exit costs. We anticipate that we will realize the benefits of our restructuring through lower labor costs and other operating expenses in future periods.
 
Restructuring and severance costs are expensed during the period in which we become obligated to pay those costs, and all other requirements for accrual are met. Because transfers of manufacturing operations sometimes occur incrementally over a period, the expense initially recorded is often based on estimates.
 
Because these costs are recorded based on estimates, our actual expenditures for restructuring activities may differ from the initially recorded costs. If this happens, we will need to adjust our estimates in future periods, either by recording additional expenses in future periods, if our initial estimates were too low, or by reversing part of the charges that we recorded initially, if our initial estimates were too high.
 
Under previous accounting standards, plant closure and employee termination costs that we incurred in connection with our acquisition activities were included in the costs of our acquisitions and did not affect earnings or losses on our statement of operations. ASC Topic 805, which we adopted effective January 1, 2009, now requires such costs to be recorded as expenses in our statement of operations, as such expenses are incurred.
 
Goodwill
 
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of the net assets acquired at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but rather tested for impairment at least annually. We perform our annual impairment test as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. These impairment tests must be performed more frequently if there are triggering events.
 
ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other , prescribes a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. In the first step, we determine the fair value of the reporting unit and compare that fair value to the net book value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis (an income approach) and a comparable companies market multiple approach.
 
To measure the amount of the impairment, ASC Topic 350 prescribes that we determine the implied fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if we had acquired those reporting units. Specifically, we must allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets of that unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a hypothetical calculation that would yield the implied fair value of goodwill. The impairment loss is measured as the difference between the book value of the goodwill and the implied fair value of the goodwill computed in step two.
 
- 62 -
 


Vishay Intertechnology evaluated the goodwill associated with our business as a separate reporting unit for ASC Topic 350 evaluation purposes. For the purposes of the combined and consolidated financial statements presented on a stand-alone basis, we have evaluated our goodwill using our operating segments, namely, Foil Technology Products and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, as its reporting units.
 
In light of a sustained decline in market capitalization for Vishay Intertechnology and its peer group companies, and other factors, Vishay Intertechnology determined that an interim impairment test was necessary as of the end of the second, third, and fourth fiscal quarters of 2008.
 
Based on Vishay Intertechnology’s interim impairment tests performed as of the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008, we performed retrospective goodwill impairment tests for our reporting units as of the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008.
 
After completing step one of the impairment tests as of June 28, 2008 and as of September 27, 2008, we determined that the estimated fair values of our reporting units were greater than the book values of those units, and accordingly, no second step was required as of those dates.
 
Given the further deterioration of market conditions in the fourth quarter of 2008, an additional impairment test was performed as of December 31, 2008 (the end of the fourth fiscal quarter). After completing step one of the impairment test as of December 31, 2008, we determined that the estimated fair value of each of its reporting units was less than the net book values of those reporting units. This required the completion of the second step of the impairment evaluation. Upon completion of the step two analysis, we recorded impairment charges. Subsequent to recording these impairment charges, there was no remaining goodwill recorded on the combined and consolidated balance sheet.
 
The determination of the fair value of the reporting units and the allocation of that value to individual assets and liabilities within those reporting units requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to: the selection of appropriate comparable companies; control premiums appropriate for acquisitions in the industries in which we compete; the discount rate; terminal growth rates; and forecasts of revenue, operating income, depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures. The allocation requires several analyses to determine fair value of assets and liabilities including, among others, completed technology, trade names, in-process research and development, customer relationships, and certain property and equipment (valued at replacement costs).
 
Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual financial results could differ from those estimates. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial results or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting unit or the amount of the goodwill impairment charge.
 
The goodwill impairment charge is noncash in nature and does not affect our liquidity, cash flows from operating activities, and will not have a material impact on future operations.
 
We perform our annual impairment test as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. The interim impairment test performed as of September 27, 2008, the last day of our fiscal third quarter, was effectively our annual impairment test for 2008. There was no impairment identified through the annual impairment test completed in 2007.
 
- 63 -
 


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
We assess the impairment of our long-lived assets other than goodwill, including property and equipment and identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important, which could trigger an impairment review, include significant changes in the manner of our use of the asset, changes in historical or projected operating performance, and significant negative economic trends.
 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
 
Accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans involves numerous assumptions and estimates. The discount rate at which obligations could effectively be settled and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets are two critical assumptions in measuring the cost and benefit obligations of our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Other important assumptions include the anticipated rate of future increases in compensation levels, estimated mortality, and for postretirement medical plans, increases or trends in health care costs. Management reviews these assumptions at least annually. We use independent actuaries to assist us in formulating assumptions and making estimates. These assumptions are updated periodically to reflect the actual experience and expectations on a plan-specific basis as appropriate.
 
Our defined benefit plans are concentrated in the United States and the United Kingdom. Plans in these countries comprise approximately 96% of our retirement obligations at December 31, 2009. We utilize published long-term high-quality bond indices to determine the discount rate at the measurement date. We utilize bond yields at various maturity dates to reflect the timing of expected future benefit payments. We believe the discount rates selected are the rates at which these obligations could effectively be settled.
 
For benefit plans which are funded, we establish strategic asset allocation percentage targets and appropriate benchmarks for significant asset classes with the aim of achieving a prudent balance between return and risk. We set the expected long-term rate of return based on the expected long-term average rates of return to be achieved by the underlying investment portfolios. In establishing this rate, we consider historical and expected returns for the asset classes in which the plans are invested, advice from pension consultants and investment advisors, and current economic and capital market conditions. The expected return on plan assets is incorporated into the computation of pension expense. The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred. The net deferral of past asset losses (gains) affects the calculated value of plan assets and, ultimately, future pension expense (income).
 
We believe that the current assumptions used to estimate plan obligations and annual expense are appropriate in the current economic environment. However, if economic conditions change, we may be inclined to change some of our assumptions, and the resulting change could have a material impact on the combined and consolidated statements of operations and on the combined and consolidated balance sheet.
 
- 64 -
 


Income Taxes
 
At or prior to the spin-off, we will enter a tax matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology under which Vishay Intertechnology will be responsible for all income taxes for periods before the date of the spin-off other than taxes for which a liability is recorded on our books at the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology is also principally responsible for managing any income tax audits by the various tax jurisdictions for pre-spin-off periods.
 
Income taxes as presented in the combined and consolidated financial statements are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although our operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S. federal and certain state tax returns, and United Kingdom “group relief” has been claimed. Vishay Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, our tax results are not necessarily indicative of future performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that we would have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
We have recorded deferred tax assets representing future tax benefits, but may not be able to realize these future tax benefits in certain jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the expected future realizability of these deferred tax assets. We periodically evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets by assessing the valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization include our forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.
 
Earnings generated by our non-U.S. subsidiaries are deemed to be reinvested outside of the United States indefinitely. Accordingly, generally no provision has been made for U.S. federal and state income taxes on these foreign earnings. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits), state income taxes, incremental foreign income taxes, and withholding taxes payable to various foreign countries.
 
We are or will be subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves are established when we believe that certain positions might be challenged despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances and the provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. At April 3, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, there are no reserves because we have been indemnified by Vishay Intertechnology.
 
- 65 -
 


Results of Operations  Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
 
Statement of operations’ captions as a percentage of sales and the effective tax rates were as follows:
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Costs of products sold      69.4 % 66.9 % 64.6 %
Gross profit 30.6 % 33.1 % 35.4 %
Selling, general, and administrative expenses 25.2 % 21.4 % 20.1 %
Operating income (loss) 4.2 % -29.6 % 15.1 %
Income (loss) before taxes 3.9 % -28.3 % 15.3 %
Net earnings (loss) 1.0 % -30.7 % 11.6 %
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Parent 1.0 %      -30.7 % 11.6 %
                  
Effective tax rate 74.6 % -8.3 %      24.1 %

Net Revenues
 
Net revenues were as follows (dollars in thousands) :
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Net revenues $      171,991   $      241,700     $      239,036
Change versus prior year $ (69,709 ) $ 2,664
Percentage change versus prior year -28.8 % 1.1 %  

Changes in net revenues were attributable to the following:
 
2009 vs. 2008       2008 vs. 2007
Change attributable to:
Change in volume -28.4 % -4.7 %
Change in average selling prices 1.1 %   -0.3 %
Foreign currency effects -2.8 % 1.9 %
Acquisitions 0.9 % 4.3 %
Other 0.4 % -0.1 %
Net change -28.8 % 1.1 %
   
Our revenues were negatively impacted by the recession, with a significant reduction in volumes across both of our segments and across all geographies and sales channels.
 
- 66 -
 


Gross Profit and Margins
 
Gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 30.6%, as compared to 33.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in gross profit margin reflects significantly lower volume, partially offset by our fixed cost reduction programs and favorable currency impacts.
 
Gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 33.1%, as compared to 35.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in gross profit margin reflects negative foreign currency effects and generally higher raw materials costs.
 
Segments
 
Analysis of revenues and gross profit margins for our reportable segments is provided below.
 
Foil Technology Products
 
Net revenues of the Foil Technology Products segment were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Net revenues $ 71,871 $      92,904   $      94,300
Change versus prior year $      (21,033 ) $ (1,396 )    
Percentage change versus prior year -22.6 % -1.5 %  

Changes in Foil Technology Products segment net revenues were attributable to the following:
 
2009 vs. 2008       2008 vs. 2007
Change attributable to:
Change in volume      -23.9 %      -5.2 %
Change in average selling prices 1.0 %   -0.6 %
Foreign currency effects -7.3 % 3.2 %
Acquisitions 1.2 % 1.2 %
Other 6.4 % -0.1 %
Net change -22.6 % -1.5 %
  
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the Foil Technology Products segment were as follows:
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Gross margin percentage      42.3 %        45.8 %        49.0 %

- 67 -
 


Weighing Modules and Control Systems
 
Net revenues of the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Net revenues $      100,120   $      148,796     $      144,736
Change versus prior year $ (48,676 ) $ 4,060
Percentage change versus prior year -32.7 % 2.8 %  

Changes in Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment net revenues were attributable to the following:
 
2009 vs. 2008       2008 vs. 2007
Change attributable to:  
Change in volume -31.3 % -4.5 %
Change in average selling prices 1.2 % -0.1 %
Foreign currency effects -3.2 %   1.0 %
Acquisitions 0.7 % 6.4 %
Other -0.1 % 0.0 %
Net change -32.7 % 2.8 %
  
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment were as follows:
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Gross margin percentage 22.3 %   25.1 % 26.5 %

- 68 -
 


Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Total SG&A expenses $      43,356   $      51,714   $      48,017
       as a percentage of sales 25.2 % 21.4 % 20.1 %

Given the specialized nature of our products and our direct sales approach, we incur significant selling, general, and administrative costs.
 
The overall decrease in SG&A expenses for 2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to lower sales and our cost containment initiatives. The increase in SG&A as a percentage of revenues is primarily due to the decrease in revenues.
 
The overall increase in SG&A expenses for 2008 as compared to 2007 is primarily attributable to acquisitions.
 
Several items included in SG&A expenses impact the comparability of these amounts, as summarized below (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
2009       2008       2007
Allocation of corporate overhead costs $ 1,813 $ 2,771   $ 2,449
Amortization of intangible assets        3,019   2,441 1,667
Net loss (gain) on sales of assets 34      (1,189 )      (1,155 )

The increases in amortization expense are generally due to the acquisitions. We acquired PM Group during the second quarter of 2007, and we acquired our partner’s 51% interest in the Indian transducers joint venture and Powertron GmbH during the third quarter of 2008.
 
Throughout the periods described above, we had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of our business. While these transactions are not necessarily indicative of the terms we would have achieved had we been a separate entity, management believes they are reasonable. A description of these transactions and allocations is included in Note 3 to our historical combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
As discussed elsewhere in this information statement, historically, we have used the corporate services of Vishay Intertechnology for a variety of functions including treasury, tax, legal, internal audit, human resources, and risk management. After the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly traded company. We expect to incur additional SG&A costs associated with being an independent, publicly traded company. These additional anticipated costs are not reflected in the historical combined and consolidated financial statements, but are reflected in our unaudited pro forma financial statements presented beginning on page 49.
 
- 69 -
 


Restructuring and Severance Costs
 
We recorded restructuring and severance costs of $2.0 million, $6.3 million, and $0.4 million during 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These costs were incurred as part of our cost reduction initiatives and/or in response to the global economic recession.
 
During 2007, we transferred significant load cell manufacturing operations from our City of Industry, California facility to existing facilities in the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and Israel. This resulted in a significant reduction in the number of employees in City of Industry, which today is principally a warehouse and distribution center with only minor manufacturing operations. We incurred $0.2 million of restructuring and severance costs associated with the downsizing of our City of Industry, California facility. We also incurred $0.1 million of other restructuring and severance costs during 2007.
 
As part of our acquisition of PM Group in 2007, we transferred certain manufacturing operations from Bradford, United Kingdom to the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan). The costs associated with these transfers, which aggregated $0.3 million, were included in the cost of acquisition of PM Group under then-applicable accounting standards.
 
During 2008, we announced the closure of our load cell manufacturing facility in Breda, the Netherlands, and transferred all manufacturing operations to Israel. We incurred $5.7 million of restructuring and severance costs associated with the closure of our Breda, the Netherlands, facility.
 
In response to the economic downturn during the latter half of 2008 and 2009, we undertook significant measures to cut costs. This included a strict adaptation of manufacturing capacity to sellable volume and limiting the building of product for inventory. It also included permanent employee terminations, and temporary layoffs and shutdowns. We incurred restructuring and severance costs of $0.6 million and $2.0 million in 2008 and 2009, respectively, as a result of these programs in response to the global recession.
 
Other Income (Expense)
 
2009 Compared to 2008
 
Total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased by $0.3 million compared to the prior year, primarily attributable to lower interest rates and a lower balance of net payable to Vishay Intertechnology. Interest expense on the net payable to Vishay Intertechnology is included in the combined and consolidated financial statements based on the prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility, or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities.
 
The following table analyzes the components of the line “Other” on the combined and consolidated statement of operations (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,  
2009       2008       Change
Foreign exchange gain (loss) $ 122   $      2,470   $ (2,348 )
Interest income 725   1,902 (1,177 )
Income recognized on the equity method - 444   (444 )
Other        (133 ) (36 ) (97 )
$ 714 $ 4,780   $ (4,066 )
  
- 70 -
 


2008 Compared to 2007
 
Total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased by $0.7 million compared to the prior year, primarily attributable to lower interest rates and a lower balance of third-party debt. Interest expense on the net payable to Vishay Intertechnology is included in the combined and consolidated financial statements based on the prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility, or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities.
 
The following table analyzes the components of the line “Other” on the combined and consolidated statement of operations (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,  
2008       2007       Change
Foreign exchange gain (loss) $ 2,470 $ 872 $ 1,598
Interest income 1,902 1,550     352
Income recognized on the equity method 444     489   (45 )
Other   (36 ) (123 ) 87
$      4,780 $      2,788 $      1,992
 
Income Taxes
 
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 74.6%, as compared to -8.3% for the year ended December 31, 2008, and 24.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
The effective tax rates reflect the fact that we could not recognize for accounting purposes the tax benefit of losses incurred in certain jurisdictions, although these losses may be available to offset future taxable income. Under applicable accounting principles, we may not recognize deferred tax assets for loss carryforwards in jurisdictions where there is a recent history of cumulative losses, where there is no taxable income in the carryback period, where there is insufficient evidence of future earnings to overcome the loss history and where there is no other positive evidence, such as the likely reversal of taxable temporary differences, that would result in the utilization of loss carryforwards for tax purposes.
 
The high effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 is principally due to losses in tax jurisdictions where we could not record a deferred tax benefit.
 
The negative tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 was principally attributable to the goodwill impairment charge recorded in 2008. The vast majority of our goodwill was not deductible for income tax purposes. We recognized tax benefits of $1.0 million during 2008, associated with the goodwill impairment charge.
 
The income taxes presented in the combined and consolidated financial statements are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although our operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S. federal and state tax returns or certain non-U.S. jurisdictions tax returns. Vishay Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, our tax expense as presented in the combined and consolidated financial statements is not necessarily indicative of future performance and does not necessarily reflect the results that we would have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
- 71 -
 


We operate in an international environment with significant operations in various locations outside the U.S. Accordingly, the consolidated income tax rate is a composite rate reflecting our earnings and the applicable tax rates in the various locations where we operate. Part of our strategy is to achieve cost savings through the transfer and expansion of manufacturing operations to countries where we can benefit from lower labor costs and available tax and other government-sponsored incentives. Changes in the effective tax rate are largely attributable to changes in the mix of pretax income among our various taxing jurisdictions.
 
Additional information about income taxes is included in Note 7 to our combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Results of Operations – Fiscal Quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
 
Statement of operations’ captions as a percentage of sales and the effective tax rates were as follows:
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Costs of products sold 64.6 % 67.9 %
Gross profit 35.4 %   32.1 %
Selling, general, and administrative expenses 27.4 % 25.2 %
Operating income (loss) 8.0 % 5.8 %
Income (loss) before taxes 7.5 % 5.4 %
Net earnings (loss) 3.7 % 1.4 %
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Parent 3.7 % 1.3 %
 
Effective tax rate 50.3 % 74.6 %

Net Revenues
 
Net revenues were as follows (dollars in thousands) :
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Net revenues $       48,175 $       43,705
Change versus comparable prior year period $ 4,470  
Percentage change versus comparable prior year period 10.2 %  
Changes in net revenues were attributable to the following:
 
  vs. prior year
  quarter
Change attributable to:
Change in volume 6.3 %
Change in average selling prices 0.2 %
Foreign currency effects   3.7 %
Other 0.0 %
Net change 10.2 %
       
During the first quarter of 2010, our sales volume increased due to improving economic conditions. Our book-to-bill ratio of 1.12 for the quarter indicates further recovery in subsequent quarters.
 
- 72 -
 


Gross Profit and Margins
 
Gross profit margin for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 was 35.4%, as compared to 32.1% for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009. The increase in gross profit margin reflects manufacturing efficiencies resulting from higher production volume and our fixed cost reduction programs.
 
Segments
 
Analysis of revenues and gross profit margins for our reportable segments is provided below.
 
Foil Technology Products
 
Net revenues of the Foil Technology Products segment were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Net revenues $       23,897 $       19,268
Change versus comparable prior year period $ 4,629      
Percentage change versus comparable prior year period 24.0 %  

Changes in Foil Technology Products segment net revenues were attributable to the following:
 
vs. prior year
quarter
Change attributable to:
Change in volume 19.5 %
Change in average selling prices 0.8 %
Foreign currency effects 2.6 %
Other 1.1 %
Net change 24.0 %
 
 
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the Foil Technology Products segment were as follows:
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Gross margin percentage 49.9 %   41.4 %
 
- 73 -



Weighing Modules and Control Systems
 
Net revenues of the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Net revenues $       24,278   $       24,437
Change versus comparable prior year period $ (159 )
Percentage change versus comparable prior year period -0.7 %    

Changes in Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment net revenues were attributable to the following:
 
vs. prior year
quarter
Change attributable to:  
Change in volume -4.2 %
Change in average selling prices -0.4 %
Foreign currency effects 4.1 %
Other -0.2 %
Net change -0.7 %
 
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment were as follows:
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Gross margin percentage 21.1 % 24.8 %
 
- 74 -



Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Total SG&A expenses $ 13,207     $ 11,024
as a percentage of sales 27.4 % 25.2 %

Given the specialized nature of our products and our direct sales approach, we incur significant selling, general, and administrative costs.
 
SG&A expenses have increased versus the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to increased personnel costs as we prepare to function as an independent, publicly-traded company. Personnel costs have also increased due to the resumption of employee bonus programs that were suspended in 2009 due to the recession.
 
Several items included in SG&A expenses impact the comparability of these amounts, as summarized below (in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009
Allocation of corporate overhead costs $ 560 $ 491
Amortization of intangible assets   760     745
Net loss (gain) on sales of assets (3 ) 19

Throughout the periods described above, we had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of our business. While these transactions are not necessarily indicative of the terms we would have achieved had we been a separate entity, management believes they are reasonable. A description of these transactions and allocations is included in Note 2 to our historical unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
As discussed elsewhere in this information statement, historically, we have used the corporate services of Vishay Intertechnology for a variety of functions including treasury, tax, legal, internal audit, human resources, and risk management. After the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly traded company. We expect to incur additional SG&A costs associated with being an independent, publicly traded company. These additional anticipated costs are not reflected in the historical combined and consolidated financial statements, but are reflected in our unaudited pro forma financial statements presented beginning on page 49.
 
- 75 -
 


Other Income (Expense)
 
Total interest expense for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 decreased by $0.2 million versus the comparable prior year period, primarily attributable to lower interest rates and a lower balance of net payable to Vishay Intertechnology. Interest expense on the net payable to Vishay Intertechnology is included in the combined and consolidated financial statements based on the prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility, or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities.
 
The following table analyzes the components of the line “Other” on the combined and consolidated statement of operations (in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended        
April 3, 2010      March 28, 2009      Change
Foreign exchange gain $       46 $       4 $       42
Interest income 91   179   (88 )
Other   (141 ) (7 )   (134 )
  $ (4 ) $ 176 $ (180 )
 
Income Taxes
 
The effective tax rate for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 was 50.3%, as compared to 74.6% for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009.
 
The provision for income taxes consists of provisions for federal, state, and foreign income taxes calculated on a separate tax return basis. The effective tax rates for the periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 reflect our expected tax rate on reported income before income tax and tax adjustments. We operate in an international environment with significant operations in various locations outside the United States. Accordingly, the consolidated income tax rate is a composite rate reflecting our earnings and the applicable tax rates in the various locations where we operate. Changes in the effective tax rate are largely attributable to changes in the mix of pretax income among our various taxing jurisdictions.
 
The effective tax rates reflect the fact that we could not recognize for accounting purposes the tax benefit of losses incurred in certain jurisdictions, although these losses may be available to offset future taxable income. Under applicable accounting principles, we may not recognize deferred tax assets for loss carryforwards in jurisdictions where there is a recent history of cumulative losses, where there is no taxable income in the carryback period, where there is insufficient evidence of future earnings to overcome the loss history and where there is no other positive evidence, such as the likely reversal of taxable temporary differences, that would result in the utilization of loss carryforwards for tax purposes.
 
The high effective tax rate for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 are principally due to losses in tax jurisdictions where we could not record a deferred tax benefit.
 
The income taxes presented in the unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although our operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S. federal and state tax returns or certain non-U.S. jurisdictions tax returns. Vishay Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, our tax expense as presented in the combined and consolidated financial statements is not necessarily indicative of future performance and does not necessarily reflect the results that we would have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
Additional information about income taxes is included in Note 4 to our unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
- 76 -
 


Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
 
At April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had significant cash balances and limited third-party debt. We historically have had significant amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology affiliates. The payable to Vishay Intertechnology affiliates of $33.4 million (as of April 3, 2010) will be repaid at or prior to the spin-off.
 
Pursuant to the master separation agreement, the target net cash balance at the spin-off date is $65.0 million. “Net cash” for these purposes is defined as cash and cash equivalents less third-party indebtedness less notes payable to banks less the book value of the exchangeable notes allocated to us. Amounts greater than 110% of the target net cash balance ($71.5 million) will be distributed to Vishay Intertechnology in the form of a dividend effective as of the spin-off date; amounts less than 90% of the target net cash balance ($58.5 million) will be contributed to us by Vishay Intertechnology effective as of the spin-off date.
 
Due to our strong product portfolio and market position, our business has historically generated significant cash flow. In 2009, 2008, and 2007, we generated $29.2 million, $22.5 million, and $32.1 million, respectively, of cash from operating activities. During the first quarter of 2010, we generated $4.9 million of cash from operating activities, versus $5.1 million during the comparable prior year period. Our cash flow gives us the flexibility to create stockholder value by investing in our business.
 
We focus on our ability to generate cash flows from operations. The cash generated from operations is used to fund our capital expenditure plans, and cash in excess of our capital expenditure needs is available to fund our acquisition strategy.
 
We refer to the amount of cash generated from operations in excess of our capital expenditure needs and net of proceeds from the sale of assets as “free cash,” a measure which management uses to evaluate our ability to fund acquisitions. We historically have generated positive “free cash,” even in the current recession, and we expect to continue to be able to do so. There is no assurance, however, that we will be able to continue to generate free cash after the spin-off.
 
We will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology's outstanding exchangeable notes due 2102, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation. Also, our Japanese subsidiary will continue to have debt of approximately $1.6 million outstanding. Otherwise, we do not expect to have outstanding indebtedness at the time of the spin-off. We expect to enter into a revolving credit facility in the approximate amount of $40 million with a consortium of banks to provide us with flexibility and additional liquidity, shortly after the spin-off date.
 
- 77 -
 


The following table summarizes the components of net cash (debt) at April 3, 2010 on an actual and pro forma basis (assuming the spin-off had occurred on April 3, 2010) and at December 31, 2009 on an actual basis (in thousands):
 
April 3, 2010 April 3, 2010 December 31, 2009
Actual      Pro Forma      Actual
Third-party debt, including current and long-term
       Revolving credit facility $       $       $       -
       Third-party debt held by Japanese subsidiary 1,621 1,621   1,735
       Exchangeable notes due 2102 - 13,000 -
       Notes payable to banks -   -   9
              Total third-party debt   1,621   14,621 1,744
       Net payable to affiliates 33,443 - 18,495
              Total debt 35,064 14,621 20,239
 
Cash and cash equivalents $ 80,421 $ 73,121 $ 63,192
 
Net cash (debt) position $ 45,357 $ 58,500 $ 42,953
 
Measurements such as “free cash” and “net cash (debt)” do not have uniform definitions and are not recognized in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Such measures should not be viewed as alternatives to GAAP measures of performance or liquidity. However, management believes that “free cash” is a meaningful measure of our ability to fund acquisitions, and that an analysis of “net cash (debt)” assists investors in understanding aspects of our cash and debt management. These measures, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
 
Approximately 79% and 98% of our cash and cash equivalents balance at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, was held by our non-U.S. subsidiaries. If cash is repatriated to the United States, we would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits), state income taxes, incremental foreign income taxes, and withholding taxes payable to various foreign countries. Any amounts contributed to us by Vishay Intertechnology on the spin-off date pursuant to the master separation agreement will be contributed in the United States.
 
Our financial condition as of April 3, 2010 is strong, with a current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) of 2.9 to 1, as compared to a ratio of 3.7 to 1 at December 31, 2009, a ratio of 6.2 to 1 at December 31, 2008 and a ratio of 5.1 to 1 at December 31, 2007. The decrease in this ratio in 2010 is primarily attributable to a temporary increase in amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology. The decrease in this ratio in 2009 is primarily attributable to the reduction in cash that resulted from the year-end settlement of various amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology. On a pro forma basis, assuming the repayment of the net payable to Vishay Intertechnology from cash on-hand, our current ratio at April 3, 2010, and at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 would be 5.9 to 1, 6.4 to 1, 4.5 to 1, and 4.2 to 1, respectively. The changes in the pro forma current ratio are primarily due to changes in working capital.
 
Our business is not particularly capital intensive. Cash paid for property and equipment for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 were $1.9 million and $0.8 million. Cash paid for property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $2.2 million, $7.4 million, and $8.3 million, respectively. We limited our capital expenditures in the latter half of 2008 and 2009 as a result of the economic uncertainty. This reduced level of annual capital spending is temporary and not sustainable. Capital expenditures for 2010 are expected to be approximately $10.3 million, to expand our business.
 
- 78 -
 


Cash paid for acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2008 totaled $24.3 million for the acquisitions of our partner’s 51% interest in a transducers manufacturing joint venture and Powertron GmbH. Cash paid for acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $46.8 million, representing the purchase price of PM Group, net of cash acquired. The sale of PM Group’s electrical contracting business generated proceeds of $16.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2007. “Other investing activities” on the combined and consolidated statements of cash flows principally represent principal payments on a long-term note related to the sale of AeroGo, a business acquired as part of the acquisition of SI Technologies and divested in 2005. At December 31, 2009, the note receivable related to the disposition of the AeroGo business has been fully repaid.
 
Contractual Commitments
 
As of December 31, 2009, we had contractual obligations as follows (in thousands) :
 
Payments due by period
Less than 1-3 4-5 After 5
Total       1 year       years       years       years
Long-term debt $ 1,735 $ 184 $ - $ 905 $ 646
Interest payments on long-term debt 175 35 62 26 52
Net payable to affiliates 18,495 18,495   - -   -
Operating leases 5,210 2,339 2,650 221 -
Non-competition agreements 2,298 543 780   780 195
Expected pension and      
       postretirement plan funding 7,304   390 1,030 1,363 4,521
Total contractual cash obligations $      35,217 $      21,986 $      4,522 $      3,295 $      5,414

Effective as of the spin-off date, we will assume the liability for a portion of Vishay Intertechnology s outstanding exchangeable notes due 2102, in accordance with the terms of that instrument, based on the relative trading values of Vishay Intertechnology and our common stock following the separation. The table above does not reflect this future allocation of debt. We expect that the liability we assume for Vishay Intertechnology’s exchangeable notes will be approximately $13 million, however, the exact amount of the liability under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.  See note (h) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54 for additional information, including how the amount of liability that we expect to assume was estimated.
 
There were no material changes to these commitments during the three fiscal months ended April 3, 2010, except for the balance of the net payable to Vishay Intertechnology and affiliates, which temporarily increased to $33.4 million.  These balances will be repaid as of the date of the spin-off.
 
For a further discussion of our long-term debt, amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology and affiliates, leases, non-competition agreement payment liabilities, and pensions and other postretirement benefits, see Notes 3, 5, 8, and 10 to our combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Inflation
 
Normally, inflation does not have a significant impact on our operations as our products are not generally sold on long-term contracts. Consequently, we can adjust our selling prices, to the extent permitted by competition, to reflect cost increases caused by inflation.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
See Note 2 to our combined and consolidated financial statements and Note 1 to our unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
 
- 79 -
 


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are exposed to certain financial risks, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. We manage our exposure to these market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Our policies do not allow speculation in derivative instruments for profit or execution of derivative instrument contracts for which there are no underlying exposures. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes and we are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. We monitor our underlying market risk exposures on an ongoing basis and believe that we can modify or adapt our strategies as needed.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our borrowing activities and our cash balances.
 
W e historically have had significant amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology affiliates. The remaining balance ($33.4 million as of April 3, 2010 and $18.5 million as of December 31, 2009) will be repaid at or prior to the spin-off.
 
These intercompany borrowings bear interest based on the prevailing interest rate on Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility, which is based on a LIBOR spread (currently LIBOR plus 1.4%).
 
We expect to enter into a revolving credit facility with a consortium of banks to provide us with flexibility and additional liquidity shortly after the separation. We expect that our revolving credit facility will bear interest based on a variable rate.
 
A t April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have $80.4 million and $63.2 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents, which accrues interest at various variable rates.
 
Based on the debt and cash positions at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we would expect a 50 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates to increase or decrease our annualized net earnings by approximately $0.2 million.
 
See Notes 3 and 8 to our combined and consolidated financial statements for additional information about our long-term debt, including net payable to affiliates.
 
- 80 -
 


Foreign Exchange Risk
 
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks, particularly due to market values of transactions in currencies other than the functional currencies of certain subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we did not have any outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
 
Our significant foreign currency exposures are to the British pound, Israeli shekel, Euro, Indian rupee, Japanese yen, Swedish krona, Taiwanese dollar, and Chinese renminbi.
 
We finance our operations in Europe and certain locations in Asia in local currencies. Our operations in Israel and certain locations in Asia are largely financed in U.S. dollars, but these subsidiaries also have significant transactions in local currencies. Our exposure to foreign currency risk is mitigated to the extent that the costs incurred and the revenues earned in a particular currency offset one another. Our exposure to foreign currency risk is more pronounced in Israel and China because the percentage of expenses denominated in Israeli shekels and Chinese renminbi to total expenses is much greater than the percentage of sales denominated in Israeli shekels and Chinese renminbi to total sales. Therefore, if the Israeli shekel and Chinese renminbi strengthen against all or most of our other major currencies, our operating profit is reduced. We also have a higher percentage of British pound-denominated sales than expenses. Therefore, when the British pound strengthens against all or most of our other major currencies, our operating profit is increased. Accordingly, we monitor several important cross-rates.
 
We have performed a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2009, using a model that measures the change in the values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, with all other variables held constant. The foreign currency exchange rates we used were based on market rates in effect at December 31, 2009. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would impact our net earnings by approximately $1.2 million at December 31, 2009, although individual line items in our combined and consolidated statement of operations would be materially affected. For example, a 10% weakening in all foreign currencies would increase the U.S. dollar equivalent of operating income generated in foreign currencies, which would be offset by foreign exchange losses of our foreign subsidiaries that have significant transactions in U.S. dollars or have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency.
 
There have been no material changes in our foreign currency exchange rate risks during the first fiscal quarter of 2010. In May 2010, the sovereign debt fears in the euro zone caused the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange rate to fluctuate significantly. This fluctuation could materially impact our future results.
 
A change in the mix of the currencies in which we transact our business could have a material effect on the estimated impact of the hypothetical 10% movement in the value of the U.S. dollar. Furthermore, the timing of cash receipts and disbursements could result in materially different actual results versus the hypothetical 10% movement in the value of the U.S. dollar, particularly if there are significant changes in exchange rates in a short period of time.
 
- 81 -
 


Commodity Price Risk
 
Although most materials incorporated in our products are available from a number of sources, certain materials are available only from a relatively limited number of suppliers.
 
Some of the most highly specialized materials for our sensors are sourced from a single vendor. We maintain a safety stock inventory of critical materials, and have entered into consignment arrangements with certain vendors to assure the availability of critical materials at our facilities.
 
Certain metals used in the manufacture of our products are traded on active markets, and can be subject to significant price volatility.
 
Our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected if we have difficulty obtaining these raw materials, the quality of available raw materials deteriorates, or there are significant price changes for these raw materials. For periods in which the prices of these raw materials are rising, we may be unable to pass on the increased cost to our customers which would result in decreased margins for the products in which they are used. For periods in which the prices are declining, we may be required to write down our inventory carrying cost of these raw materials, since we record our inventory at the lower of cost or market. Depending on the extent of the difference between market price and our carrying cost, this write-down could have a material adverse effect on our net earnings. We also may need to record losses for adverse purchase commitments for these materials in periods of declining prices.
 
We estimate that a 10% increase or decrease in the costs of raw materials subject to commodity price risk would decrease or increase our net earnings by $0.3 million, assuming that such changes in our costs have no impact on the selling prices of our products and that we have no pending commitments to purchase metals at fixed prices.
 
There have been no material changes in our commodity price risks during the first fiscal quarter of 2010.
 
- 82 -
 


DESCRIPTION OF OUR BUSINESS
 
Our Business
 
We are a designer, manufacturer and marketer of resistive foil technology products such as resistive sensors, weighing modules, and control systems for a wide variety of applications.
 
Our business is currently part of Vishay Intertechnology and our assets and liabilities consist of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses. Following the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly traded company, and Vishay Intertechnology will not retain any ownership interest in us.
 
Resistors are basic components used in all forms of electronic circuitry to adjust and regulate levels of voltage and current. They vary widely in precision and cost, and are manufactured from numerous materials and in many forms. Foil resistors are the most precise and stable type of resistors available. A strain gage is a special type of resistive sensor for measurement of weights and other types of stress.
 
In the 1950’s, Dr. Felix Zandman was issued patents for PhotoStress® coatings and instruments, used to reveal and measure the distribution of stresses in structures such as airplanes and cars under live load conditions. His research in this area led him to develop Bulk Metal® foil resistors and resistive current sensors with performance beyond any other resistor available in the global market.
 
In 1962, Dr. Zandman, with the financial help of the late Alfred P. Slaner, founded Vishay Intertechnology to develop and manufacture Bulk Metal® foil resistors. Concurrently, J.E. Starr, a colleague of Dr. Zandman, started to produce foil resistance strain gages, which also became part of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
These innovations were the genesis of the foil technology business that is the foundation of the Vishay Precision Group business.  The subsequent advancement of foil resistance and strain gage technology opened the door to numerous commercial applications such as for weighing modules and control systems on a vertical market basis.
 
Meanwhile, the Vishay Intertechnology business strategy diverged into a much more broad based horizontal market approach to the electrical components business. Through a series of acquisitions beginning in 1985, Vishay Intertechnology transformed itself into a broad-line manufacturer and supplier of discrete semiconductors and passive electronic components.  The foil technology and strain gage business no longer formed an integral element of the Vishay Intertechnology business strategy.
 
In the last decade, Vishay Intertechnology attempted to renew focus on the foil technology-based business through a series of acquisitions that expanded its measurements business to form what is now Vishay Precision Group.   Areas of focus included transducers/load cells - a combination of strain gages and the metallic structures to which they are bonded; load cell modules that include electronic instrumentation and software for measuring the load cell output; measurement instrumentation; and complete systems for process control and on-board weighing.
 
Our growth and acquisition strategy largely focuses on vertical product integration, using our foil resistance strain gages in our load cell products and incorporating our load cells and electronic measurement instrumentation (containing foil resistors) and software into our modules and measurement systems. Current sensing foil resistor products are also part of certain control systems that we manufacture. Many of our acquisitions in recent years have been directed towards furthering our vertical integration strategy, and we expect to continue to focus our acquisition program in this direction.
 
The following describes acquisitions by Vishay Intertechnology since 2002, which form the core operations of our business:
  • In January 2002, we acquired the load cell and strain gage business of Sensortronics, Inc. As part of our acquisition of Sensortronics, we obtained manufacturing facilities in Covina, California (which we subsequently consolidated) and a 49% interest in a joint venture in India.
     
  • In June 2002, we acquired Tedea-Huntleigh BV, a manufacturer of load cells used in digital scales by the weighing industry. With the Tedea-Huntleigh acquisition, we acquired two manufacturing facilities in Israel, in Netanya and Carmiel, and facilities in the People’s Republic of China and France.
- 83 -
 


  • In July 2002, we purchased the BLH and Nobel businesses from Thermo Electron Corporation. The BLH and Nobel businesses produce load cell based process weighing systems, weighing and batching instruments, web tension transducers, weighing scales, servo control systems, and components relating to load cells, including foil strain gages. As part of our acquisition of these businesses, we acquired our manufacturing facilities in Sweden and Costa Rica.
     
  • In October 2002, we acquired Celtron Technologies, another company engaged in the production and sale of load cells used in digital scales for the weighing industry. As part of our acquisition of Celtron, we acquired leased manufacturing facilities in the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the People’s Republic of China.
     
  • In April 2005, we acquired all of the capital stock of SI Technologies, Inc., which had been a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ. SI Technologies designs, manufactures, and markets high-performance industrial load cells, weighing and factory automation systems, and related products. As part of our acquisition of SI Technologies, we acquired facilities in Tustin, California (which we subsequently consolidated) and Breda, the Netherlands (which we subsequently closed).
     
  • In November 2005, we acquired Alpha Electronics Corporation KK, a Japanese manufacturer of foil resistors. As part of our acquisition of Alpha Electronics, we acquired our manufacturing facility in Akita, Japan.
     
  • In April 2007, we completed a tender offer to acquire PM Group PLC, which had been a publicly traded company traded on the London Stock Exchange. PM Group, through its PM On-board business, is an advanced designer and manufacturer of systems used in the weighing and process control industries, located in the United Kingdom.
     
  • In June 2008, we acquired our partner’s 51% interest in the transducers manufacturing joint venture in India. Concurrent with this transaction, we moved into a new leased manufacturing facility in Chennai, India, which we plan to expand.
     
  • In July 2008, we acquired Powertron GmbH, a manufacturer of specialty precision resistors. As part of our acquisition of Powertron, we acquired leased manufacturing facilities near Berlin, Germany.
We also have manufacturing facilities in North Carolina, Be’er Sheva, Israel, and Holon, Israel.
 
Our business is subject to risks. These include risks related to increased competition, challenges related to our acquisition strategy such as integration of acquisitions and our ability to finance such acquisitions, our ability to successfully innovate and in a timely manner, our ability to leverage and protect the success of our business through effective intellectual property rights, and other commercial, market, legal, political and internal factors and constraints. For a more detailed description of these risks, see “Risk Factors.”
 
We were incorporated in Delaware on August 28, 2009. Our principal executive offices are located at 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355. Our main telephone number is 484-321-5300.
 
- 84 -
 


Our Competitive Strengths
 
Strong Product Portfolio
 
Foil resistors and sensors are based on a specialty technology which we invented. We manufacture and sell high precision foil resistors, foil resistance strain gages and strain gage instruments containing foil resistors. Through our vertical integration strategy, we have added products such as transducers/load cells—a combination of strain gages and the metallic structures to which they are bonded; load cell modules that include electronic instrumentation (which include foil resistors) and software for measuring the load cell output; and complete systems for process control and on-board weighing applications.
 
Competition in the markets where we sell the bulk of our precision measurement products is extremely fragmented both geographically and by application.
 
Research and Development Capabilities
 
Many of our products and manufacturing techniques and technologies have been invented, designed, and developed by our engineers and scientists. Special proprietary resistive metallic foil is the most important material in both our foil resistors and our foil resistance strain gages, and our research and development activities related to foil materials is an important linkage between these two products. We maintain strategically placed design centers where proximity to customers enables us to more easily gauge and satisfy the needs of local markets. We also maintain research and development staffs and promote programs at a number of our production facilities to develop new products and new applications of existing products, and to improve manufacturing techniques.
 
A Successful Track Record in Acquiring and Integrating Companies
 
Since 2002, we have implemented a strategy of vertical product integration, growing through acquisition from a manufacturer of strain gages to a producer of load cells that incorporate these strain gages, to a designer of sophisticated weighing and process control modules combining load cells with software and electronics, to a provider of complete systems that integrate load cells and load cell modules with comprehensive, real-time measurement, tracking and reporting capabilities.
 
Diversified Customer Base
 
Our customer base is diversified in terms of industry, geographic region, and range of product needs. No single customer accounts for more than 5% of our net revenues. Within the broad industrial market, our products serve a wide variety of applications in the waste management, bulk hauling, logging, scale, engineering systems, pharmaceutical, oil, chemical, steel, paper, and food industries. Our products also have uses in military/aerospace, automotive, and to a much lesser extent, consumer product applications. Our reach is global, with approximately 40% of our net revenues attributable to customers in the Americas, approximately 40% of our revenues attributable to customers in Europe, and approximately 20% of our revenues attributable to customers in Asia. We also sell through a variety of sales channels, including original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), electronic manufacturing services companies (which manufacture for OEMs on an outsourcing basis), independent distributors, and for our weighing modules and control systems products, end-use customers.
 
Significant Cash Flow Generation
 
Due to our strong product portfolio and market position, our business has historically generated significant cash flow. In 2009, 2008, and 2007, we generated $29.2 million, $22.5 million, and $32.1 million, respectively, of cash from operating activities. We expect that, as an independent public company, our strong cash flow will enable us to build stockholder value through investment in our infrastructure, maintenance of a vibrant research and product development program and the pursuit of suitable acquisition opportunities, while maintaining a prudent capital structure.
 
Our Key Challenges
 
Increased Competition
 
We face varying degrees and types of competition in our different businesses, and some of our competitors are located in China and other countries that have significantly different regulatory environments than we do in the U.S. and in the other countries within which we have substantial operations.  In order to continue to grow our business successfully, we will need to compete effectively in the markets in which we operate.
 
- 85 -
 


Implementation of Acquisition Strategy
 
Our acquisition strategy promotes the acquisition of businesses that facilitate our vertical integration.  In order for that strategy to be successful, we will need to continue to identify attractive and available acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions on favorable terms and integrate new businesses, manufacturing processes, employees, and logistical arrangements into our evolving chain of products.
 
Economic Environment
 
The global economic downturn has had a significant impact on all industries, and our industry is no exception to this trend.  Commencing in the second half of 2009, we have been seeing signs of economic recovery, including sequential increases in quarterly revenues and gross margins. Our continued success depends on the stability or improvement in the global economy and in the local economies in which we and our customers operate. Our net earnings (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $1.7 million, $(74.1) million, and $27.7 million, respectively.  Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflects a goodwill impairment charge of $93.5 million, reflective of the global economic downturn.
 
For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition and could also adversely effect the trading price of our common stock, see “Risk Factors” commencing on page 16.
 
Key Business Strategies
 
Historically, we have operated as part of Vishay Intertechnology, sharing services and capital with Vishay Intertechnology’s discrete semiconductor and passive components businesses. Following our spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology, we intend to advance resistive foil technology by vertically integrating strain gages and current sensors into process control systems. As an independent publicly traded company, we believe we will be better positioned to compete in the precision measurement industry and to invest in and grow our business. Specifically, we intend to focus on the following strategic initiatives:
 
Vertical Integration
 
Since 2002, we have implemented a strategy of vertical product integration, by growing our weighing and process control systems business and by promoting our sophisticated electronic weighing modules and other products that integrate the precision measurement components that we design and produce. We are targeting the market for sophisticated load cell modules and turnkey weighing and force measurement systems as a primary driver of our future growth.
 
Acquisitions
 
We expect to continue our program of strategic acquisitions, particularly where opportunities present themselves to grow our systems business. Upon completion of acquisitions, we seek to reduce selling, general, and administrative expenses through the integration or elimination of redundant sales offices and administrative functions at acquired companies. In addition, we will benefit from our current global manufacturing footprint and distribution channels.
 
Enhance Cost Structure
 
We seek to achieve significant production cost savings through the transfer and expansion of manufacturing operations to countries such as Costa Rica, India, Israel, the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of China (Taiwan), where we can benefit from lower labor costs or available tax and other government-sponsored incentives.
 
Invest in Innovation to Drive Growth
 
Our product portfolio is focused to a significant extent on specialty products that require us to form long-term relationships with our customers. We expect to continue to use our research and development, engineering, and product marketing resources to roll out new and innovative products. Our ability to react to changing customer needs and industry trends will continue to be key to our success. Our design, research, and product development teams, in partnership with our marketing teams, drive our efforts to bring innovations to market. We intend to leverage our insights into customer demand to continually develop and roll out new innovative products within our existing lines and to modify our existing core products in ways that make them more appealing, addressing changing customer needs and industry trends.
 
- 86 -
 


Products
 
Our product portfolio includes:
  • Bulk Metal® foil resistors and resistor current sensors – Foil resistors are the most precise and stable type of resistors available. Resistors are basic components used in all forms of electronic circuitry to adjust and regulate levels of voltage and current. A resistor can also be used to detect current, by measuring the voltage drop across its path. Our foil resistors and current sensors are used in applications requiring a high degree of precision and stability, such as in medical applications, testing equipment, high-performance audio equipment, and aerospace and military applications.
     
  • Foil strain gages – Strain gages are electronic sensors used to detect weight and other forms of stress. They are widely used in structural stress analysis, for example in aircraft and automobiles, and in weighing, process control, and other forms of force measurement.
     
  • PhotoStress® products – PhotoStress coatings and instruments use a unique optical process to reveal and measure the distribution of stresses in structures under live load conditions. They are used to improve structural design in aerospace, automotive, military, civil engineering, industrial, and mechanical applications .
     
  • Transducers / Load cells – Foil strain gage transducers consist of one or more strain gages bonded to a metallic support. The term “load cell” is primarily used to describe transducers used in weighing applications. A transducer is mounted on a structure subject to weight or other stress, such as the platform of an industrial scale. The change in resistance of the strain gages in response to deformation of the transducer by the applied load is detected by electronic instrumentation. Transducers are manufactured with different designs and configurations depending on their application and the type of stress or strain to be measured, for example weight or tension. We produce both analog and digital transducers.
     
  • Modules – Modules are transducers combined with a mounting and with external features such as instruments and cables and are used for weighing and control applications.
     
  • Instruments – Instruments measure, process, digitize, display, and record the output of our strain gages, transducers, and control systems.
     
  • Control systems – Control systems are integrated systems for the detection and measurement of weight and other types of stress or strain, primarily in industrial processes. These include systems to control process weighing in food, chemical, and pharmaceutical plants; force measurement systems used to control web tension in paper mills, roller force in steel mills, and cable tension in winch controls; on-board weighing systems installed in logging and waste-handling trucks; and special scale systems used for aircraft weighing and portable truck weighing.
Product Segments
 
Our products are primarily based on resistive foil technology which was originated and developed by Vishay Intertechnology. This technology evolved and continues to evolve for different applications used in many markets.
 
Our products can be divided into two general classes: Foil Technology Products and Weighing Modules and Control Systems. Foil Technology Products include our strain gages, ultra-precision foil resistors, current sensors and PhotoStress products. Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment products include transducers/load cells, modules, instruments, and control systems. These broad categories are also the basis used to determine our operating segments for financial reporting purposes. See Note 13 to our combined and consolidated financial statements for additional information on revenues, income, and total assets by segment and by region.
 
- 87 -
 


Qualifications and Specifications
 
Certain of our products must be qualified or approved under various military and aerospace specifications and other standards.
 
We have qualified certain of our foil resistor and sensor products under various military specifications approved and monitored by the United States Defense Electronic Supply Center (“DESC”), and under certain European military specifications, and various aerospace standards approved by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) and the European Space Agency (“ESA”).
 
Certain of our load cell products are approved by the National Type Evaluation (“NTEP”) and International Organization of Legal Metrology (“OIML”). Our on-board weighing systems must meet approved standards to make them “legal for trade.” Scales and weighing systems that are designated “legal for trade” must meet strict conformance standards to be used as commercial measuring devices, which can vary by country. Meeting these standards helps to ensure that consumers are charged fairly for goods or services rendered. Our reputation for quality is based on a commitment to the newest and most effective design, manufacturing, testing, and, management procedures and practices. We maintain extensive testing laboratories at our facilities. As a result, we are well equipped to maintain qualifications to a wide range of specifications vital to the automotive, commercial, defense, and aerospace markets, including Military Specifications (MIL), Establish Reliability (ER), British Standards (BS), National Aeronautics and Space Administrative Standards (NASA), European Space Agency (ESA) and ISO 9001 and 14001 standards.
 
Qualification and specification levels are based in part upon the rate of failure of products. We must continuously perform tests on our products, and for products that are qualified, the results of these tests must be reported to the qualifying organization. If a product fails to meet the requirements for the applicable classification level, the product’s classification may be suspended or reduced to a lower level. During the time that the classification is suspended or reduced to a lower level, net revenues and earnings attributable to that product may be adversely affected.
 
Manufacturing Operations
 
Our principal manufacturing facilities are located in the United States (North Carolina), Israel, India, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and Japan. We also have manufacturing facilities in Costa Rica, France, and Germany. Over the past several years, we have invested substantial resources to increase capacity and to maximize automation in our plants, which we believe will further reduce production costs. From 2002 through 2008, we also owned a 49% interest in a transducers manufacturer in India. In 2008, we acquired our partner’s interest in this joint venture and plan to expand our operations in India.
 
We are aggressively undertaking to have the quality systems at most of our major manufacturing facilities approved under the ISO 9001 international quality control standard. ISO 9001 is a comprehensive set of quality program standards developed by the International Standards Organization. A majority of our manufacturing operations have already received ISO 9001 approval and others are actively pursuing such approval. The manufacturing operations located in the following facilities have received ISO 9001 approval:
 
Holon, Israel
Wendell, North Carolina
Carmiel, Israel
Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Chennai, India
Degerfors, Sweden
Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
Be’er Sheva, Israel
Basingstoke, United Kingdom
Taipei, Republic of China (Taiwan)
 
The ISO 9001-approved operations at these facilities comprise approximately 85% of VPG’s overall manufacturing operations.
 
To maintain our cost competitiveness, we also pursue a strategy to shift manufacturing emphasis to more advanced automation in higher-labor-cost regions and to relocate production to regions with skilled workforces and relatively lower labor costs. See Note 6 to our combined and consolidated financial statements for further information related to our restructuring efforts, as well as additional information in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Cost Management.”
 
- 88 -
 


Sources of Supplies
 
Although most materials incorporated in our products are available from a number of sources, certain materials are available only from a relatively limited number of suppliers. The principal materials used in our products include metallic foil, aluminum, stainless steel, tool steel, plastics, and for a few products, gold. Some of the most highly specialized materials for our sensors are sourced from a single vendor. We maintain a safety stock inventory of critical materials, and have entered into consignment arrangements with certain vendors to assure the availability of critical materials at our facilities.
 
Due to our vertical product integration strategy, our Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment products are based principally on strain gages produced by us.
 
Israeli Government Incentives
 
We have substantial manufacturing operations in Israel, where we benefit from the government’s tax incentive and employment programs. These benefits take the form of reduced tax rates that are lower than those in the United States and government grants.
 
We might be materially adversely affected if events were to occur in the Middle East that interfered with our operations in Israel. However, we have never experienced any material interruption in our Israeli operations in our 39 years of operations there, in spite of several Middle East crises, including wars.
 
Inventory and Backlog
 
We manufacture both standardized products and those designed and produced to meet customer specifications. We maintain an inventory of standardized components, and monitor the backlog of outstanding orders for our products.
 
We include in our backlog only open orders that have been released by the customer for shipment in the next twelve months. Many of our customers for strain gages, load cells, and foil resistors encounter uncertain and changing demand for their products. They typically order products from us based on their forecasts. If demand falls below customers’ forecasts, or if customers do not control their inventory effectively, they may cancel or reschedule the shipments that are included in our backlog, in many instances without the payment of any penalty. Therefore, the backlog at any point in time is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future periods.
 
Customers and Marketing
 
We sell our products to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), electronic manufacturing services (“EMS”) companies, which manufacture for OEMs on an outsourcing basis, independent distributors that maintain large inventories of electronic components for resale to OEMs, and end-use customers.
 
For our Foil Technology Products segment products, during 2009, approximately 65% of our sales were to OEMs, approximately 5% of our sales were to EMS companies, and approximately 30% of our sales were to distributors. For our Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment products, during 2009, approximately 30% of our sales were to OEMs, approximately 45% of our sales were to distributors, and approximately 25% of our sales were to end-users.
 
Many of our products have historically been sold by dedicated sales forces consisting mainly of field application engineers (“FAEs”) focusing on specific market segments or specific customers. The FAEs can help meet the needs of our customers for technical and applications support. Their in-depth knowledge of customer needs is a key factor in future research and development initiatives.
 
- 89 -
 


A portion of our strain gages and foil resistors and a majority of our load cell products are sold through distributors. A small amount of our foil resistors are sold through the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization, but we expect that these sales will be transitioned to our dedicated sales forces shortly after the spin-off.
 
Our customer base is highly fragmented. Sales to our top 40 customers represent approximately only 25% of our total revenues. No single customer comprises more than 5% of our total sales.
 
During 2009, approximately 40% of our net revenues were attributable to customers in the Americas, approximately 40% were attributable to customers in Europe, and approximately 20% were attributable to customers in Asia.
 
The vast majority of our products are used in the broad industrial market, with selected uses in military/aerospace, automotive, and to a much lesser extent, consumer products. Within the industrial segment, our products serve a wide variety of applications in the waste management, bulk hauling, logging, scale, engineering systems, pharmaceutical, oil, chemical, steel, paper, and food industries.
 
Competition
 
Our markets are highly competitive. Competition in the markets where we sell the bulk of our products is extremely fragmented both geographically and by application. As a result, we face numerous regional and niche product competitors, many of which are well established in their markets. To our knowledge, there are no competitors with the same product mix as us. Our direct competitors (competing head-to-head with similar products) normally compete on a single product line and are smaller and may have less financial resources than us. General industry-wide competitors (competing with alternative conventional products) range from very small, local companies to large, international companies with greater financial resources than us.
 
Our sensors and our foil resistors are based on a specialty technology which we invented. Competitors often compete in this area with functionally equivalent but alternative products.
 
Our competitive position depends on our ability to maintain a competitive advantage on the basis of product quality, know-how, proprietary data, market knowledge, service capability, business reputation, and price competitiveness. Our sales and marketing programs aim to offer our customers a broad range of world-class technologies, superior global sales and support.
 
Research and Development
 
Our product portfolio is focused to a significant extent on specialty products that require us to form a tied cooperation between us and our customers. We expect to continue to use our research and development, engineering, and product marketing resources to roll out new and innovative products. Our ability to react to changing customer needs and industry trends will continue to be key to our success. Our design, research, and product development teams, in partnership with our marketing teams, drive our efforts to bring innovations to market. We intend to leverage our insights into customer demand to continually develop and roll out new innovative products within our existing lines and to modify our existing core products in ways that make them more appealing, addressing changing customer needs and industry trends.
 
Many of our products and manufacturing techniques, technologies, and packaging methods have been invented, designed, and developed by our engineers and scientists. We maintain strategically placed design centers where proximity to customers enables us to more easily gauge and satisfy the needs of local markets. These design centers are located in the United States, Germany, Israel, the People s Republic of China, India, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Sweden, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
 
We also maintain research and development staff and promote programs at a number of our production facilities to develop new products and new applications of existing products, and to improve manufacturing techniques. This decentralized system encourages individualized product development at specific manufacturing facilities that occasionally has applications at other facilities.
 
In addition, our sales force  is comprised of  individuals with an engineering background who can help meet the needs of our customers for technical and applications support. This in-depth knowledge of customer needs is a key factor in future research and development initiatives.
 
- 90 -
 


Patents and Licenses
 
We have made a significant investment in securing intellectual property protection for our technology and products. We seek to protect our technology by, among other things, filing patent applications for technology considered important to the development of our business. Although we have numerous United States and foreign patents covering certain of our products and manufacturing processes, no particular patent is considered individually material to our business. We also rely upon trade secrets, unpatented know-how, and continuing technological innovation.
 
Our ability to compete effectively with other companies depends, in part, on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology. Although we have been awarded, have filed applications for, or obtained numerous patents in the United States and other countries, there can be no assurance concerning the degree of protection afforded by these patents or the likelihood that pending patents will be issued.
 
We require all of our technical, research and development, sales and marketing, and management employees and most consultants and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made known to the entity or individual during the course of the entity’s or individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. Substantially all of our technical, research and development, sales and marketing, and management employees have entered into agreements providing for the assignment to us of rights to inventions made by them while employed by us.
 
We have observed that in the current business environment, companies have become more aggressive in asserting and defending patent claims against competitors. We will continue to defend our intellectual property rights, and we may become party to disputes regarding patent licensing. An unfavorable outcome regarding one of these intellectual property matters could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
 
Environment, Health and Safety
 
Vishay Intertechnology has, and we expect to adopt, an Environmental Health and Safety Policy that commits us to achieve and maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws, to promote proper management of hazardous materials for the safety of our employees and the protection of the environment, and to minimize the hazardous materials generated in the course of our operations. This policy is expected to be implemented with accountability directly to the board of directors. In addition, our manufacturing operations are subject to various federal, state, and local laws restricting discharge of materials into the environment.
 
While we attempt to identify potential environmental concerns and to minimize, or obtain indemnification for, environmental matters associated with our acquisitions, we often unavoidably inherit pre-existing environmental obligations, generally based on successor liability doctrines.  At December 31, 2009, we are not aware of any material unresolved environmental remediation obligations related to our manufacturing sites, and we have no liabilities accrued for such matters.  Although we have never been involved in any environmental matter that has had a material adverse impact on our overall operations, there can be no assurance that in connection with any past or future acquisition we will not be obligated to address environmental matters that could have a material adverse impact on our operations.
 
Under the terms of our master separation agreement with Vishay Intertechnology, each of we and Vishay Intertechnology have agreed to indemnify the other in respect of liabilities relating to its business, including environmental liability. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology.”
 
- 91 -
 


We are not involved in any pending or threatened proceedings that would require curtailment of our operations. We continually expend funds to ensure that our facilities comply with applicable environmental regulations. We believe that we are in compliance with applicable environmental laws. However, we cannot accurately predict future developments and do not necessarily have knowledge of all past occurrences on sites that we currently occupy. More stringent environmental regulations may be enacted in the future, and we cannot determine the modifications, if any, in our operations that any such future regulations might require, or the cost of compliance with such regulations. Moreover, the risk of environmental liability and remediation costs is inherent in the nature of our business and, therefore, there can be no assurance that material environmental costs, including remediation costs, will not arise in the future.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2009, we employed approximately 1,900 full-time employees, of whom approximately 88% were located outside the United States. In preparation for the spin-off, certain employees of Vishay Intertechnology who have been instrumental in the growth and development of our business have transferred to our company. Our future success is substantially dependent on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical and administrative personnel. Some of our employees outside the United States are members of trade unions. Our relationship with our employees is generally good. However, no assurance can be given that labor unrest or strikes will not occur.
 
- 92 -
 


Properties
 
Our business has approximately 17 manufacturing locations. Our manufacturing facilities include owned locations, third-party leased locations, and locations leased from Vishay Intertechnology (shared locations). The principal locations of our manufacturing facilities, along with available space including administrative offices, are listed below:
 
Approx. Available
     Product segment        Space (Square Feet)
Owned Locations
 
Holon, Israel (a) Foil Technology Products 118,000
Wendell, North Carolina USA Foil Technology Products 106,000
Carmiel, Israel   Weighing Modules and Control Systems 90,000
Bradford, United Kingdom   Weighing Modules and Control Systems 86,000
Akita, Japan (b) Foil Technology Products 45,000
Chartres, France   Foil Technology Products 11,000
Basingstoke, United Kingdom Weighing Modules and Control Systems 11,000
Alajuela, Costa Rica Weighing Modules and Control Systems 4,000
 
Third-Party Leased Locations
 
Beijing, People’s Republic of China Weighing Modules and Control Systems 46,000
Chennai, India Weighing Modules and Control Systems 35,000
Degerfors, Sweden Weighing Modules and Control Systems 30,000
Netanya, Israel Weighing Modules and Control Systems 24,000
Tianjin, People’s Republic of China Weighing Modules and Control Systems 17,000
Taipei, Republic of China (Taiwan) Weighing Modules and Control Systems 8,000
Teltow, Germany Foil Technology Products 5,000
 
Locations Leased from Vishay
Intertechnology (shared locations)
 
Nice, France Foil Technology Products (c)
Be’er Sheva, Israel Foil Technology Products 14,000

(a)      Within one year from the spin-off, all Vishay Intertechnology personnel and property will be removed from the Holon facilities. Approximate available space reported above assumes that the departure has occurred.
 
(b) A facility on the campus will be leased to Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off. Approximate available space reported above excludes the area to be leased.
 
(c) We will own certain equipment at this facility, which will be consigned to Vishay Intertechnology as a subcontractor manufacturing certain products for us.
 
In the opinion of management, our properties and equipment generally are in good operating condition and are adequate for our present needs. We do not anticipate difficulty in renewing leases as they expire or in finding alternative facilities.
 
Our corporate headquarters is located at 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355.
 
- 93 -
 


Legal Proceedings
 
From time to time we are involved in routine litigation incidental to our business. Management believes that such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, should not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
 
MANAGEMENT
 
Executive Officers
 
The persons identified in the following table, who will constitute our executive officers following the spinoff, have been employees of Vishay Intertechnology. After the spin-off, none of the executive officers will continue to be employees of Vishay Intertechnology, and they will resign any executive officer positions held with Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Name        Age      Positions to be held
Ziv Shoshani 43 Chief Executive Officer, President, and
             Director
William M. Clancy 47 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
       Officer
Thomas P. Kieffer 57 Sr. Vice President – Chief Technical Officer

Ziv Shoshani will be our Chief Executive Officer and President, and will also serve on the board of directors. Mr. Shoshani was Chief Operating Officer of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. from January 1, 2007 to November 1, 2009. During 2006, he was Deputy Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Shoshani has been Executive Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology since 2000 with various areas of responsibility, including Executive Vice President of the Capacitors and the Resistors businesses, as well as heading the Measurements Group and Foil Divisions. Mr. Shoshani has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1995 and has been a member of the Vishay Intertechnology Board of Directors since 2001. Mr. Shoshani is a nephew of Dr. Felix Zandman, the founder and executive chairman of Vishay Intertechnology who is expected to control approximately 45% of the voting power of our company following the spin-off.
 
William M. Clancy will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Clancy was Corporate Controller of Vishay Intertechnology from 1993 to November 1, 2009. He became a Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology in 2001 and a Senior Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology in 2005. Mr. Clancy also has served as Corporate Secretary of Vishay Intertechnology since 2006 and was Assistant Corporate Secretary of Vishay Intertechnology from 2002 to 2006. From June 16, 2000 until May 16, 2005 (the date Vishay Intertechnology acquired the noncontrolling interest in Siliconix incorporated), Mr. Clancy served as the principal accounting officer of Siliconix. Mr. Clancy has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1988.
 
Thomas P. Kieffer will be our Senior Vice President – Chief Technical Officer. Mr. Kieffer was promoted to the position of Senior Vice President – Corporate R&D for Vishay Intertechnology’s Measurements Group and Foil Resistors Division on January 1, 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Kieffer was Senior Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology’s Micro-Measurements and Load Cells Divisions. He became Division Head of Vishay Intertechnology’s Measurements Group Division in 2000 and from 2002 through 2005 was involved in several acquisitions of measurements businesses. Mr. Kieffer has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1984.
 
- 94 -
 


Other Members of the Management Team
 
In addition to our executive officers, we depend on certain key management employees who, as employees of Vishay Intertechnology, were instrumental in the growth and development of our business. Information about these important members of our management team is set forth below.
 
Name   Age       Positions to be held  
Dubi Zandman 58 Vice President – Systems
Rafi Uzan 44 Vice President – Load Cells
Yaron Kadim 45 Vice President – Foil
Steven Klausner 52 Vice President – Treasurer

Dubi Zandman will be our Vice President responsible for Systems division operations. He has held a similar position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2004. During 2002, Mr. Dubi Zandman was actively involved in five acquisitions for Vishay, which formed the new Vishay Transducers business. He served as Senior Sales Director of the new group until 2004. From 2004 until 2006, he served as Vice President, leading the Vishay Transducers division, and executed the acquisition of SI Technologies. Since 2006, Mr. Dubi Zandman served as Vice President – Division Head of Vishay Systems, during which time he executed the acquisition of PM Group. Mr. Dubi Zandman has been employed by Vishay since 2000, and has previously also served as Director of Vishay Intertechnology’s Electro-Films division and Sales Director of Vishay Measurements Group. Mr. Dubi Zandman is a cousin of Dr. Felix Zandman.
 
Rafi Uzan will be our Vice President responsible for Load Cells division operations. He has held a similar position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2008. From 2004 to 2008, Mr. Uzan was operations manager for Israel and for the Load Cells division within Vishay Intertechnology. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Uzan served as VP Operations and Operations Israel for Vishay Intertechnology’s Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitor (“MLCC”) Division. He also held the position of Production Manager for Vishay Intertechnology’s Inductors division from 1995 to 1998. Mr. Uzan has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1994, where he started his career in Vishay as a Process Engineer.
 
Yaron Kadim will be our Vice President responsible for Foil Resistors operations. He has held a similar position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2005. During 2004, he was Deputy VP Precision Resistors Division Head. From 2000 until 2004, Mr. Kadim was Director of R&D and Engineering in Vishay Intertechnology’s Draloric/Beyschlag resistors division. In 1998, Mr. Kadim served as Engineering Manager for Vishay Intertechnology’s plant in Be’er Sheva, Israel. From 1993 until 1998, Mr. Kadim served as the Production Manager of Vishay Intertechnology’s tantalum capacitors plant in Dimona, Israel. Mr. Kadim has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1993.
 
Steven Klausner will be our Vice President – Treasurer. He has held a similar position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2007. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Klausner was Vice President – Assistant Treasurer of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Klausner has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1992. Mr. Klausner is the brother-in-law of Marc Zandman, who, following the spin-off will become the non-executive chairman of our board of directors, and the son-in-law of Dr. Felix Zandman.
 
- 95 -
 


Board of Directors
 
Our board of directors presently consists of Ziv Shoshani, William Clancy, and Dr. Lior Yahalomi. For information concerning Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy, see “Executive Officers” above. Dr. Yahalomi is the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Clancy and Dr. Yahalomi are expected to resign from our board shortly before separation. The persons identified in the following table are expected to serve on our board of directors following the completion of the spin-off and will be elected to a one-year term by Vishay Intertechnology as our sole stockholder shortly, with the effective date of their election deferred until immediately following the spin-off.
 
Name Age
Marc Zandman 48
Ziv Shoshani 43
Samuel Broydo 73
Saul V. Reibstein 61
Timothy V. Talbert 63

Marc Zandman.   is expected to serve as the non-executive Chairman of our board of directors. Mr. Marc Zandman has been Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology since 2003, a Director of Vishay Intertechnology since 2001, and President of Vishay Intertechnology Israel Ltd. since 1998. Mr. Marc Zandman was appointed Chief Administration Officer of Vishay Intertechnology as of January 1, 2007. Mr. Marc Zandman was Group Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology Measurements Group from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Marc Zandman has served in various other capacities with Vishay Intertechnology since 1984. He is the son of Dr. Felix Zandman, the founder and executive chairman of Vishay Intertechnology who is expected to control approximately 45% of the voting power of our company following the spin-off. Mr. Marc Zandman’s dedicated service to Vishay Intertechnology and extensive knowledge of our business give him valuable experience facing issues relevant to our company.
 
Ziv Shoshani. For biographical information concerning Mr. Shoshani, see “Executive Officers.” Mr. Shoshani’s long-standing dedication to our company, exemplified in his extensive management experience and experience on the Vishay Intertechnology Board of Directors, provide him with valuable insight into the business and the operation of our company making him a valuable advisor on the Board.
 
Samuel Broydo. In January 2004, Dr. Broydo retired as the Managing Director of Technology at Applied Materials Inc., a leading manufacturer of semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Prior to joining Applied Materials, he served as the Vice President of Technology at ZyMOS Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer that pioneered Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) design methodology, from March 1984 to May 1990. Before Zymos, Dr. Broydo served as the VLSI Technology Manager for the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, a computer technology innovator, from August 1979 to September 1983. Dr. Broydo was also the VLSI Technology Group Supervisor at Bell Telephone Laboratories (Bell Labs), which was then a leading communications and electronics research company, from May 1966 to August 1979. Dr. Broydo studied at the Leningrad Polytechnic Institute and received Masters Degree in Electrical Engineering from Warsaw Polytechnic Institute; he later earned a Ph.D in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from the University of Birmingham, England. Dr. Broydo’s expertise in electronics and semiconductor technology enables him to understand our business and identify growth opportunities. Dr. Broydo also brings to our board the benefit of relevant management and infrastructure experience in solid state electronic research, design, engineering, manufacturing and problem solving.
 
- 96 -
 


Saul V. Reibstein . Since 2004, Mr. Reibstein has served as a member of the senior management team of CBIZ, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed professional services company, where, as Executive Managing Director, he manages nine business units in CBIZ’s Financial Services Group and is responsible for acquisitions of accounting firms for CBIZ on a national basis. Mr. Reibstein has over 35 years of public accounting experience, including 11 years serving as a partner in BDO Seidman, a national accounting services firm, where he was the partner in charge of the Philadelphia office from June 1997 to December 2001 and Regional Business Line Leader from December 2001 until September 2004. Mr. Reibstein is a licensed CPA in Pennsylvania and received a Bachelor of Business Administration from Temple University. Mr. Reibstein qualifies as an audit committee financial expert satisfying the rules of the SEC. Mr. Reibstein’s qualification as an audit committee financial expert as well as his extensive experience as a public accounting partner make him highly qualified to serve both as a director of our company and a financial expert on the Audit Committee. Mr. Reibstein also has relevant, long-standing experience as a manager of an NYSE-listed company that he will draw upon in advising us with respect to our listing and filing compliance.
 
Timothy V. Talbert . Mr. Talbert has served as Senior Vice President of Credit and Originations for Lease Corporation of America (“LCA”), a national equipment lessor, since July 2000, and President of the LCA Bank Corporation, a bank that augments LCA’s funding capacity, since December 2004. Previously, Mr. Talbert was Senior Vice President and Director of Asset Based Lending and Equipment Leasing of Huntington National Bank from 1997 to 2000; and prior to that, served in a variety of positions with Comerica Bank for more than 20 years. Mr. Talbert previously served on the board of directors and was a member of the audit committee of Siliconix incorporated, a NASDAQ-listed manufacturer of power semiconductors of which Vishay Intertechnology owned an 80.4% interest, from 2001 until Vishay Intertechnology acquired the non-controlling interests in 2005. Mr. Talbert received a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from University of the Pacific and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame. Mr. Talbert’s service as a director and member of the audit and compensation committees of a publicly traded company allows him to bring an important perspective to the Board. Additionally, Mr. Talbert’s service as the president of a federally regulated institution gives him relevant understanding of compliance with complex regulations and current accounting rules adding invaluable expertise to our Board.
 
All directors other than Mr. Marc Zandman and Mr. Shoshani are expected to meet the New York Stock Exchange listing standards for independence.
 
- 97 -
 


Committees of the Board of Directors
 
Effective upon the separation, our board of directors will have three committees of independent directors immediately: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of our committees will be governed by a written charter, which will be approved by our board of directors.
 
Audit Committee
 
The functions of the Audit Committee will include overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes; overseeing the audits of our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; assisting the board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independence and qualifications of our independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and performing other related functions specified in the Committee’s charter.
 
The Audit Committee is expected to consist of Mr. Reibstein, Dr. Broydo, and Mr. Talbert, each of whom satisfies the independence requirements of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the governance listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. All of the members of the Committee also satisfy the financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and Mr. Reibstein, who is expected to serve as the chairman of the Committee, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the rules of the SEC.
 
Compensation Committee
 
The functions of the Compensation Committee will include evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers and, based on this evaluation, determining and approving the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers; making recommendations to the board with respect to compensation of directors; making recommendations to the board with respect to, and administering, our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans; and performing other related functions specified in the Committee’s charter. Also see “Executive Compensation.”
 
The Compensation Committee is expected to consist of Dr. Broydo and Messrs. Reibstein and Talbert. The Compensation Committee will select its chairman at its first meeting. These directors will be “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
 
The functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will include identifying individuals qualified to become members of the board; selecting, or recommending that the board of directors select, the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders; developing and recommending to the board a set of corporate governance principles and a code of ethics for our company; overseeing the evaluation of our board and management; administering our Related Party Transactions Policy; and performing other related functions specified in the Committee’s charter.
 
The chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be designated under our Corporate Governance Principles to preside at the executive sessions of the board’s non-management directors.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is expected to consist of Dr. Broydo and Messrs. Reibstein and Talbert. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will select its chairman at its first meeting.
 
- 98 -
 


Corporate Governance
 
General
 
Following the spin-off, our day-to-day business activities will be carried out by our employees under the direction and supervision of our Chief Executive Officer. The board of directors will oversee these activities. In doing so, each director is required to use business judgment in the best interests of our company and its stockholders. The board’s primary responsibilities include:
  • Review of our performance, strategies, and major decisions;
  • Oversight of our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the integrity of our financial statements;
  • Oversight of management, including review of the CEO’s performance and succession planning for key management roles; and
  • Oversight of compensation for the CEO, key executives and the board, as well as oversight of compensation policies and programs for all employees.
Additional description of the board’s responsibilities will be included in our Corporate Governance Principles document, described below.
 
Corporate Governance Principles
 
Our board of directors is expected to adopt a set of Corporate Governance Principles in connection with the spin-off to assist them in guiding our governance practices. These practices will be regularly re-evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee in light of changing circumstances in order to continue serving the best interests of our company and our stockholders. The Corporate Governance Principles document will be available to stockholders following the separation on our website and in print upon request.
 
Codes of Conduct
 
To assure the honest and ethical conduct of our employees and officers, our board of directors will adopt the following codes of conduct, which will be posted on our website and available to stockholders upon written request following the separation.
 
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
 
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will contain standards of ethical business practices applicable to all our employees, including our officers. Among other things, this code will address corporate records, conflicts of interest, gifts and gratuities, corrupt practices, corporate opportunities, trading in company securities, contacts with the media, compliance with law, proper business and marketing practices, political contributions, discrimination and harassment, government proceedings, communications with employees and procedures for dealing with violations.
 
Code of Ethics
 
Our board will also adopt a Code of Ethics Applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Controller and Financial Managers. This code is intended to promote the honest and ethical conduct of senior management; avoidance of conflicts of interest; full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with the SEC and other public communications; compliance with laws; prompt internal reporting of violations of the code; and accountability for adherence to the code. We intend to post any amendments to or any waivers from a provision of this code on our website.
 
- 99 -
 


Director Qualifications, Nominations and Communications
 
We expect that our board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will adopt policies and procedures regarding director qualifications, nominations and communications that will take effect once we are a public company. These policies will be posted to our website and will be available to stockholders upon written request following the separation.
 
Director qualifications
 
We expect that our policy on director qualification will generally require that candidates for director be persons of integrity and sound ethical character; be able to represent all stockholders fairly; have no material conflicts of interest; have demonstrated professional achievement; have meaningful management, advisory or policy-making experience; have an appreciation of the major business issues facing our company and the industry in which we operate; and have adequate time to devote to service on our board. It will also require that our board have directors who can satisfy the independence and financial literacy and expertise standards required of us by the rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange and that the benefits of board diversity be considered in the nominations process.
 
Stockholder recommendations of director nominees
 
We expect our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to adopt procedures regarding stockholder recommendation of nominees for election to our board of directors. Under these procedures the Committee will only consider candidates who satisfy our minimum qualifications for directors, and will take into account other factors, such as the size and duration of the recommending stockholder’s ownership interest in our company. It is also expected that the Committee will adopt a general policy to re-nominate qualified incumbent directors and that, absent special circumstances, the Committee will not consider other candidates when a qualified incumbent director consents to stand for re-election.
 
Stockholder nominations of director candidates and stockholder proposal s
 
Stockholders may nominate director candidates and make proposals to be considered at the annual meeting of stockholders. As used in this section, the term “stockholder proposal” refers to a proposal by a stockholder to be presented to stockholders for a vote at a meeting of stockholders, not including a stockholder nomination of a candidate for election to the board of directors. In accordance with our bylaws, any stockholder nominations of one or more candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting or any other proposal for consideration at an annual meeting must be received by us at least 60 days and not more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding annual meeting of stockholders. The nomination or proposal must be accompanied by certain information, including:
  • information concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder, any beneficial owners of our company’s securities held by the nominating or proposing stockholder, and each nominee;
  • disclosure of any interest in our company’s securities held by the nominating or proposing stockholder and any such beneficial holder, including any long or short derivative or similar positions relating to our company’s securities;
  • in the case of a nomination, a description of any compensatory or other monetary relationships between nominating stockholder and any such beneficial holder, on the one hand, and each nominee, on the other hand; in the case of a proposal for business other than a nomination, a brief description of the proposal and the reasons for making the proposal at the meeting, as well as a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between the proposing stockholder and any beneficial owner, on the one hand, and any other person, on the other hand, in connection with the proposal;
  • in the case of a nomination, any additional information we may reasonably required in order to determine the eligibility of the nominee to serve as an independent director or that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of the nominee; and
  • information relating to the proposing or nominating stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for the proposal and/or for the election of directors in a contested election in accordance with the SEC’s proxy rules.
- 100 -
 


In addition, each nominee is required to complete and submit a questionnaire to us with respect to the background and qualification of the nominee and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, together with a written representation and agreement that the nominee (A) is not and will not become a party to any agreement or understanding as to how the nominee, if elected as a director, will act or vote on any issue or question that has not been disclosed to us or that could limit or interfere with the nominee’s ability to comply with his or her fiduciary duties as a director under applicable law, (B) is not and will not become a party to any agreement or understanding with anyone other than our company with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosed to us, and (C) would be in compliance, if elected as a director, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of our company.
 
In addition to being able to present proposals for consideration at an annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders may also be able to have their proposals included in our proxy statement and form of proxy for an annual meeting. In order to have a stockholder proposal included in the proxy statement and form of proxy, the proposal must be delivered to us at the address set forth below not later than 120 days before the date of our company’s proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the preceding annual meeting of stockholders, and the stockholder must otherwise comply with applicable SEC requirements. If the stockholder complies with these requirements for inclusion of a proposal in our proxy statement and form of proxy, the stockholder s proposal will not be excluded by virtue of failure to comply with the timing and information requirements included in our bylaws, as described above.
 
Communications with the Board
 
We also expect to adopt procedures for security holder communications with directors and interested party communication with non-management directors. Under these procedures, our stockholders will be able to communicate with the board of directors, any committee of the board or any individual director, and any interested party will be able to communicate with the non-management directors of the board as a group, by delivering communications either in writing addressed to our corporate secretary at our headquarters address or by e-mail to an address to be designated.
 
Other Policies and Procedures
 
We expect that our board or its committees will adopt other policies and procedures as required by law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or as appropriate to promote good corporate governance. Among these are—
  • whistleblower and ethics hotline procedures to be adopted by our Audit Committee for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters and to allow for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees and others of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and
     
  • a related party transaction policy, which will govern transactions between our company and our directors and executive officers and their families; stockholders owning in excess of 5% of any class of our securities; and certain affiliates of these persons.
- 101 -
 


Director Compensation
 
Cash and Equity-Based Compensation
 
We intend to compensate each non-employee director for service on the board with an annual retainer fee. The amount of the annual retainer is expected to be $75,000 for the non-executive chairman of the board and $30,000 for each other non-employee director. In addition, we intend to provide each non-employee director with a one-time grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for our company’s common stock. The one-time grant would be made upon election to the board, and the RSUs would vest ratably over three years. The RSU grant to the non-executive chairman of the board will be valued at $75,000 and the RSU grant to each other non-employee director will be valued at $30,000. The number of shares subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the award by the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
 
No separate compensation will be paid to non-employee directors for their attendance at board or committee meetings or for serving on a board committee or as the chairman of a board committee.
 
- 102 -
 


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Introduction
 
This section presents information concerning the compensation arrangements for our executive officers. Our company was formed to conduct the precision measurement and foil resistor business of Vishay Intertechnology. Historically, this business was conducted as part of the passive components segment of Vishay Intertechnology through various direct and indirect subsidiaries and not as part of a single subsidiary holding company. With the formation of Vishay Precision Group in the latter part of 2009, Vishay Intertechnology began the process of moving its precision measurement and foil resistor business to the company and its subsidiaries, a process that will be completed prior to the spin-off date. Ziv Shoshani, who has been functioning as our principal executive officer, will be our President and Chief Executive Officer, and William Clancy, who has been functioning as our principal financial officer, will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Both Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy have served as officers of various wholly-owned subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology, including Vishay Precision Group, Inc., and are at present our only executive officers.
 
Mr. Shoshani has been an executive officer of Vishay Intertechnology since 2003 but will step down from that position on the distribution date. Mr. Clancy has been an employee of Vishay Intertechnology since 1988 but did not serve as an executive officer of Vishay Intertechnology. We anticipate that Mr. Thomas Kieffer, who will be our Chief Technology Officer, will become an executive officer of our company effective as of the distribution date. Mr. Kieffer is presently employed in one of Vishay Precision Group’s subsidiaries.
 
We present historical financial information concerning the compensation of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy  and Kieffer for 2009. This information reflects compensation received for all of 2009 and includes compensation received from Vishay Intertechnology prior to the time they became executive officers of our company. This historical compensation may not be directly relevant to the compensation that Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy will receive from us.
 
We also present information concerning the future compensation of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer under “2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision Group.” These compensation arrangements have been negotiated between the respective officers and the strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology with the advice of management and approved by the Vishay Intertechnology board of directors. We anticipate that following the distribution date, Mr. Shoshani will enter into an employment agreement with us, consistent with the terms set forth below, which will be negotiated between Mr. Shoshani and our compensation committee.
 
Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy hold certain equity-based long-term incentive awards that were granted to them by Vishay Intertechnology. The treatment of these awards in the spin-off is described under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology – Employee Matters Agreement – Equity Awards.”
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
 
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes certain elements of the compensation arrangements for the named executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology, and its compensation philosophy, particularly as they relate to Mr. Shoshani. We believe that certain of the compensation arrangements and elements of compensation philosophy at Vishay Intertechnology have relevance for understanding the initial compensation arrangements for our executive officers, because the strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology were responsible in part for determining the initial compensation of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer, our executive officers. In addition, we expect that certain elements of the compensation for our executive officers will be similar to the elements of the executive compensation at Vishay Intertechnology.
 
- 103 -
 


We note, however, that following the distribution date, our board of directors will establish a compensation committee that will be responsible for our company’s executive compensation. We anticipate that the compensation committee will review all aspects of the compensation of our executive officers, and the compensation philosophy of our compensation committee following the distribution date could differ from the historical compensation philosophy of Vishay Intertechnology. While we anticipate that, at least initially, the compensation committee will leave intact the arrangements with our executive officers described below, the committee could determine to make changes, either in the short- or long-term. The compensation committee of our board will also be responsible for entering into an employment agreement with Mr. Shoshani, in his intended role as our Chief Executive Officer.
 
Compensation Philosophy Generally
 
The compensation programs of Vishay Intertechnology were historically designed to support its business goals and promote its short- and long-term profitable growth. The equity plans of Vishay Intertechnology are designed to ensure that executive compensation programs and practices are aligned with the long-term interests of the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders. The total compensation of each individual varies with individual performance and Vishay Intertechnology’s overall performance in achieving financial and non-financial objectives.
 
The compensation committee and management of Vishay Intertechnology believe that compensation should help to recruit, retain, and motivate key employees who can function effectively both in periods of recession and economic upturn. Ordinarily an executive officer’s total compensation should consist of a combination of cash payments and equity awards, to achieve the right balance between short- and long-term performance. Equity-based compensation should serve to align the interests of management with those of stockholders. Severance protection should provide executives with an appropriate level of job security, commensurate with their contributions to the company and their tenure.
 
The compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology, in consultation with the company’s chief executive officer, undertakes an annual review of the compensation arrangements of the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Vishay Intertechnology historically has taken into account what it terms “adjusted net income,” among other things, in setting bonuses for its two most senior executive officers. Vishay Intertechnology uses this term to mean net income determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), adjusted to exclude various items that management believes are not indicative of the intrinsic operating performance of its business, including restructuring and related severance costs, fixed asset or inventory write-downs and related purchase commitment charges, impairment charges for goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets, and individually material one-time gains or charges.  The employment agreements of these two executives sets forth that their bonus will be equal to a percentage of adjusted net income, subject to a maximum bonus equal to three times base salary.
 
The bonuses for the other executive officers and managers of Vishay Intertechnology, including Mr. Shoshani, have historically generally been based on achievement of a combination of corporate and personal objectives.  Corporate objectives have included, among other things, “adjusted operating margin,” which means operating income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, adjusted to exclude various items that management believes are not indicative of the intrinsic operating performance of its business, including restructuring and related severance costs, fixed asset or inventory write-downs and related purchase commitment charges, impairment charges for goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets, and individually material one-time gains or charges.  For those managers who are not executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology and whose bonus performance measures include adjusted operating margin, the adjusted operating margin used may either be the adjusted operating margin of Vishay Intertechnology or the adjusted operating margin of a particular division or business unit of Vishay Intertechnology.  Other components of the bonus determination for such other executive officers and managers have included additional corporate financial and operational objectives, as well as personal goals, in each case tailored to the executives’ specific responsibilities.
 
In the early part of each calendar year, the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology, in consultation with its Executive Chairman and CEO, establishes the target adjusted operating margin for Vishay Intertechnology, as well as additional appropriate financial measure(s) for individual executives and business units.  The achievement of performance objectives at the corporate and business unit level as well as for each executive individually, is reviewed by the CEO and the compensation committee upon the availability of year-end financial results, resulting in a performance score for the executive in each of several categories.  The executive’s total performance score represents the percentage of the executive’s base salary earned as a bonus.  Each executive’s maximum performance score is established either pursuant to the executive’s employment contract (if any) or by the compensation committee at the time the annual performance objectives are set at the commencement of the year.
 
The compensation committee and management of Vishay Intertechnology have always believed that the elements of compensation for the company’s senior executives reward intrinsically sound management decisions and do not encourage risk-taking to enhance short-term profitability at the expense of the long-term health and viability of the enterprise.
 
 
- 104 -
 
 


In designing executive compensation arrangements to avoid encouraging inappropriate risk-taking, the compensation committee considers various factors which are intended to provide an appropriate mix of compensation components, with no portion being too heavily weighted towards the achievement of short-term goals.  Historically, such consideration has largely been incorporated into the committee’s general deliberation of the overall structure and terms of executive compensation arrangements.  In response to current trends in executive compensation practices, as well as recently adopted SEC rules encouraging more explicit focus on risks arising from compensation policies, Vishay Intertechnology has commenced a practice of more deliberately focusing on the risks, if any, arising from its executive compensation arrangements, and modifying such arrangements to the extent necessary to minimize any such risks.
The factors considered by the compensation committee in evaluating the risks arising from compensation arrangements, which have been incorporated into the terms and conditions of such compensation arrangements, include, in no particular weighting or order of prominence:
  • base salaries are fixed in amount,
     
  • capping annual cash bonuses for executive officers.  While annual cash bonuses focus on the achievement of short-term or annual goals and short-term goals may encourage risk-taking, the committee considers the other compensation arrangements which appropriately balance risk and the desire to focus on short-term goals.
     
  • deferring a meaningful portion of total compensation until retirement or termination of employment,
     
  • compensating executives, in part, in the form of phantom stock units for which the stock is only received upon retirement or termination of employment, thus providing an incentive for the creation of long-term shareholder value.  The value of these restricted stock units is at risk if Vishay Intertechnology’s stock price declines.
Each of these factors is intended to encourage an appropriately long-term focus, and to align the long-term interests of senior management with those of stockholders.
 
As described below, in response to the global recession, at the beginning of 2009, the compensation committee determined not to award any bonus compensation for 2009. This is consistent with the committee s prudent management of compensation matters and further serves to avoid inappropriate risk-taking by our employees.
 
- 105 -
 


Employment Agreements
 
In 2004, under the direction of its compensation committee and with the advice of a compensation consultant, Vishay Intertechnology engaged in a major review and overhaul of the compensation practices for its named executive officers. As a consequence of this review, Vishay Intertechnology entered into comprehensive employment agreements and other arrangements with each of its named executive officers at the time, including Mr. Shoshani. The agreement and other arrangements with Mr. Shoshani, except for base salary, have remained unchanged since that time.
 
The compensation arrangements embodied in the agreements with each of the executive officers at the time, including the agreement with Mr. Shoshani, were based upon the expectation that they would remain in place for a period of time. The agreements have an evergreen feature, whereby at the end of each year another year is added, so that effectively the agreements always have three remaining years in their term. An evergreen term is essentially similar to the right of an executive to receive severance if the company does not renew his employment agreement at the end of its stated term. As a consequence, the compensation arrangements can only be modified with the respective executive’s consent, without which the executive would otherwise have the right to terminate employment and receive severance pay.
 
Response to the Global Recession
 
The nearly unprecedented disruption in the global economy that began in the summer of 2008 and that continued into late 2009 had a substantial impact on the compensation policies of Vishay Intertechnology in 2009. Conservation of cash and generating free cash, which Vishay Intertechnology defines as cash flow from operations less cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sale of fixed assets, became central to the company’s short-term management objectives. Among the measures that Vishay Intertechnology undertook to conserve cash was the imposition of a freeze on compensation, where possible, and the elimination of bonuses for 2009. Although contractually entitled to cash bonus compensation, the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology agreed to forgo these bonuses in 2009 unless conditions improved. Also, the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology determined not to make any discretionary award of equity-based compensation for 2009, in part because of the unsettled market environment and because of the depressed price of the company’s stock to historically low levels at the time. With the improvement in the worldwide economy and the business of Vishay Intertechnology beginning in late 2009 and carrying forward into the first half of 2010, Vishay Intertechnology expects that its compensation committee will resume its historical compensation packages for 2010.
 
Compensation Components
 
The components of the compensation packages for the named executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology, as prescribed by their employment agreements, include base salary, commensurate with the roles and responsibility of the executives; annual performance-based bonuses; deferred compensation; and customary welfare and retirement benefits. The compensation committee also considers the award of extra-contractual equity-based compensation on a year-by-year basis. In making its compensation determinations, the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology reviews data on compensation practices of 47 public companies that are similar to Vishay Intertechnology in terms of revenues, number of employees, market capitalization, geographic location and/or scope of international operations, and that are found in the Fortune 1000 listing and the S&P MidCap 400 Index. These companies include several active in the semiconductor and electronic components industry, and others in different industries. While the Committee believes that its compensation practices for executives are generally in line with compensation practices at the 47 companies whose data it reviews, it did not perform a quantitative benchmarking analysis and did not set compensation within a specific range of such data .
 
- 106 -
 


The public companies reviewed for general comparison included:
 
 
Direct Competitors of Vishay
Other Fortune 1000 Semiconductor
Other S&P MidCap 400
Intertechnology
and Electronic Components
Components
 
Companies
 
     
  • ON Semiconductor
  • Fairchild Semiconductor
  • International Rectifier
  • AVX
  • KEMET Corporation
  • Xilinx
  • Novellus
  • Lam Research
  • Sandisk
  • Maxim Integrated Products
  • LSI
  • KLA Tencor
  • National Semiconductor
  • Analog Devices
  • Spansion
  • Amkor
  • Benchmark Electronics
  • NVIDIA
  • Broadcom
  • Micron
  • Advanced Micro Devices
  • Applied Materials
  • Flextronics
  • Sanmina-SCI
  • Texas Instruments
  • Intel
  • Ametek
  • Palm
  • SPX
  • Diebold
  • Imation
  • Hubbell Inc
  • Arrow
  • FMC
  • Aqua America
  • Thomas & Betts
  • Charming Shoppes
  • SEI Investments
  • Teleflex
  • Toll Brothers
  • Urban Outfitters
  • Wilmington Trust
  • Endo Pharmaceuticals
  • Cephalon
  • Cabot Corporation
  • Atmel
  • Avnet
 
The compensation packages for the senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology also include severance benefits that the compensation committee believes are consistent with severance programs for similarly situated senior executives at comparable public companies.
 
- 107 -
 


Ziv Shoshani
 
Although Mr. Shoshani assumed the role of principal executive officer of our company effective November 1, 2009, he continues to be compensated as an executive officer of Vishay Intertechnology, in accordance with his existing employment arrangements, until the distribution date.
 
General . The compensation package of Mr. Shoshani has been somewhat lower than the compensation of executive officers of his rank at other, comparable public companies in consideration of his transitional status in the management structure of Vishay Intertechnology, prior to his assuming chief executive responsibilities for our company. This was part of the succession program of Vishay Intertechnology, whereby Mr. Shoshani was in preparation to assume more senior executive responsibilities.
 
Base salary . The minimum base salary level for Mr. Shoshani was fixed in his 2004 employment agreement. The compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology reviews the base salary level each year to determine whether an increase would be appropriate, considering individual performance, prior years’ compensation level, recent operating results, operating results of competitors, projections for the future, other components of the executive pay packages, perceived salary trends in executive base salary among the peer group of Vishay Intertechnology and input on executive performance from the chief executive officer. Determining the base salary is qualitative and subjective, and no specific quantitative weighting of the various factors is assigned. Qualitatively, individual performance, projections of future individual performance, perceived salary trends among peer group companies, and the input on executive performance by the chief executive officer generally are given more weight.
 
The base salary for Mr. Shoshani remained the same through 2005, but was increased in each of 2006, 2007, and 2008. Also, because the base salary of Mr. Shoshani has been denominated in Israeli shekels beginning in 2007, a portion of the increase in his salary since then, expressed in terms of U.S. dollars, reflects the significant weakening of the dollar against the shekel. Mr. Shoshani’s base salary, as denominated in Israeli shekels, remained unchanged in 2009 from the prior year, in response to the unprecedented global recession consistent with all of the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Performance bonus . Under his employment contract, Mr. Shoshani is eligible for a performance bonus of up to 42.5% of his base salary.  The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Shoshani is determined by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee, based on the company’s performance and Mr. Shoshani’s individual performance.
 
For 2009, Mr. Shoshani’s corporate performance metrics included divisional adjusted operating margin and inventory turnover, in each case for the combined Measurements Group and Foil Resistors divisions.  With respect the adjusted operating margin performance metric, Mr. Shoshani would not be eligible to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than or equal to 80% of target.  If actual adjusted operating margin were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to adjusted operating margin, increasing ratably from 0% to 60% of the maximum bonus potential for adjusted operating margin.  Finally, if actual adjusted operating margin were between 100% and 120% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to adjusted operating margin, increasing ratably from 60% to 100% of the maximum bonus potential for adjusted operating margin.
 
The combined Measurements Group and Foil Resistors divisional adjusted operating margin target for 2009 was $47.9 million, and Mr. Shoshani would have been entitled to receive a bonus of 30% of his base salary based on achievement of divisional adjusted operating margin at 120% of target.  Because the actual adjusted operating margin was less than 80% of the target, Mr. Shoshani did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the divisional adjusted operating margin component.
 
Mr. Shoshani would have been eligible to receive a bonus of 5% of his base salary based on achievement of targeted combined Measurements Group and Foil Resistors divisional inventory turnover.  The divisional inventory turnover target for 2009 was 2.89x.  Because the actual inventory turnover was less than the target, Mr. Shoshani did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the divisional inventory turnover component.
 
Finally, Mr. Shoshani would have been eligible to receive a bonus of up to 7.5% of his base salary based on the achievement of individual performance goals in 2009. The individual performance goals are established by the Chief Executive Officer of Vishay Intertechnology in consultation with Mr. Shoshani at the beginning of each calendar year, and the Vishay Intertechnology Chief Executive Officer determines the extent to which the performance goals are met following the end of each year, which is ratified by the Board of Directors of Vishay Intertechnology. For 2009, Mr. Shoshani's individual performance goals and related bonus opportunity as a percentage of base salary (in parentheses) included achieving a $5 million reduction in fixed costs of the Vishay Intertechnology Foil & Measurement Group without a freeze in employee compensation, versus the 2009 budget (2%), reducing the capital equipment spending budget for the Foil & Measurement Group to $2.6 million (2%), timely completion of the relocation of the Netanya, Israel facility production to the Carmiel, Israel facility (1%), completing the closure of the Breda customer service and warehouse (1%), and monitoring the relocation of the sample center to Columbus, Nebraska and the relocation of the Kanot warehouse relocation to Be'er Sheva, Israel (1.5%).
 
- 108 -
 


As noted above under “Response to the Global Recession,” Mr. Shoshani, along with the other executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology, agreed to forgo any performance bonus to which he otherwise would be entitled for 2009, in consideration of the challenging business environment during the year. Because bonuses were foregone, performance objective achievement was not quantified.  However, Vishay Intertechnology management estimates that Mr. Shoshani would have been eligible for a bonus of between $15,000 and $22,900 based on the achievement of his individual performance goals.
 
Incentive compensation . The compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology makes an annual determination whether to award extra-contractual equity-based compensation to the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology on a year-by-year basis. As noted above, the committee determined not to make any such awards for 2009, again in consideration of the challenging business environment during the year. Mr. Shoshani was eligible for extra-contractual Restricted Stock Units ( RSUs”) in 2008, however, Vishay Intertechnology had to make certain regulatory filings in Israel before such grant could be made. These approvals were received in 2009, and the grant was made accordingly.
 
Deferred compensation . Vishay Intertechnology executives are eligible to participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which is available to all employees who meet certain criteria under the Internal Revenue Code. Vishay Intertechnology annually contributes $100,000 to this plan on behalf of Mr. Shoshani, pursuant to his employment agreement, similar to the contributions for other of its senior executives. Mr. Shoshani, along with other senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology, has elected to defer all eligible amounts of compensation until retirement or termination of employment, at which time the amounts would be paid in a lump sum. To the extent required to avoid tax penalties, the deferred amounts are not paid until six months after the termination of employment. Mr. Shoshani, like most other senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology has a long-standing relationship with the company. At the suggestion of management, the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee therefore considered this deferred compensation in the nature of a retirement benefit and an anticipatory reward for loyalty to Vishay Intertechnology over time. While deferred, amounts are credited with “earnings” based on the performance of notional investment options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited during 2009 was “above market” or “preferential.”
 
Phantom stock units . Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Shoshani receives annual grants of phantom stock units, similar to the grants for other senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology. The grants are made under the stockholder-approved Vishay Intertechnology Senior Executive Phantom Stock Plan. Similar to the deferred cash compensation described above, the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee considers the grant of phantom stock units in the nature of a retirement benefit and an anticipatory reward for loyalty to Vishay Intertechnology over time. The cumulative increase in the number of phantom stock units held by the executives over time also is intended to strengthen the alignment of executive and stockholder interests in the long-term appreciation of the equity value of Vishay Intertechnology. The deferred equity compensation consists of 5,000 phantom stock units awarded to each executive on the first business day of each calendar year and was fixed by contract in 2004.
 
Severance . The Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee believes that severance payments in the event of an involuntary termination of employment are part of a standard compensation package for senior executives. Consequently, in 2004, the compensation committee included severance provisions for Vishay Intertechnology executive officers in their employment contracts.
 
Mr. Shoshani’s employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology contains severance provisions providing generally for three years of compensation in the case of a termination without cause or a voluntary termination by the executive for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreement). Specifically, severance items include:
  • salary continuation for three years, payable over three years;
  • 5,000 shares of common stock annually for three years. Because these shares are granted after termination of employment, actual shares – rather than phantom stock units – are granted;
  • bonus for the year of termination;
  • $1,500,000 lump sum cash payment. This payment replaces the annual deferred compensation credits and the annual bonus for the 3-year severance period;
  • lifetime continuation of executive’s life insurance benefit; and
  • continuation of the executive’s medical benefit for a maximum of three years if the termination occurs before attaining age 62 and lifetime continuation up to $15,000 annual premium value if the termination occurs after attaining age 62.
- 109 -
 


The following table sets forth the compensation that would have been received by Mr. Shoshani had he been terminated as of December 31, 2009.
 
                        Life       Nonqualified
Salary Lump sum insurance / deferred
continuation   Stock grants termination medical compensation
(1)   Bonus (2) (3) payment benefit (4) (5)
$ 916,077 $ - $ 125,250 $ 1,500,000 $ 36,569 $ 636,957

      (1)       Equals 3 times U.S. dollar value of 2009 salary, paid over three years.
 
(2) Consists of bonus and non-equity incentive plan compensation as reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table,” which is zero for 2009 due to a decision by the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology to voluntarily forgo bonuses in response to the global recession.
 
(3) Equals 15,000 shares multiplied by $8.35, which was the closing price of Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock on December 31, 2009. The shares are to be paid out over three years.
 
(4) Present value of accumulated benefit reflected in the “Pension Benefits” table, paid annually until death.
 
(5) Aggregate balance at year end as reflected in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table.
 
Retirement benefits . The Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee believes that providing an adequate retirement benefit commensurate with position is essential to retaining qualified individuals for long-term employment. The retirement benefits for Mr. Shoshani are not materially preferential to those of other employees of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Perquisites . Vishay Intertechnology provides executive officers, including Mr. Shoshani with perquisites and other personal benefits that the company and its compensation committee believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program. These perquisites are not intended, however, to constitute a material portion of the executive’s compensation packages. In general, the perquisites, while not integral to the performance of an executive’s duties, must bear some relationship to the executive’s employment and be of perceived benefit to Vishay Intertechnology. The Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to the company’s executive officers, including Mr. Shoshani.
 
Israeli benefits . Mr. Shoshani is a resident of Israel. As a result, he is entitled to certain benefits that are generally available to employees in Israel on a non-discriminatory basis, including:
  • advanced training fund, 7.5% of base salary;
  • severance fund, 8.33% of base salary;
  • disability insurance, 2.5% of base salary; and
  • pension fund, 5% of base salary.
These benefits are required by Israeli law and employment practices generally, and were taken into account by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee in formulating the overall compensation package for Mr. Shoshani.
 
2010 compensation . Until the distribution date, Mr. Shoshani will be compensated under the terms of his existing employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology and as otherwise determined by the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology. The compensation committee, with advice from management, has determined, in light of the pending spin-off, to maintain Mr. Shoshani’s base compensation through the distribution date at the same level for 2010 as in 2009 and not to award any discretionary long-term compensation of Vishay Intertechnology equity to Mr. Shoshani in 2010. Mr. Shoshani will receive a one-time cash bonus from Vishay Intertechnology in the amount of  $600,000 upon the successful completion of the spin-off. The only requirement that needs to be met in order for Mr. Shoshani to receive this special bonus is the successful completion of the spin-off. Corporate or individual performance following the spin-off will not affect Mr. Shoshani right to receive or retain this special bonus from Vishay Intertechnology. See “2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision Group  – Employment Terms – Ziv Shoshani – Special bonuses.”
 
- 110 -
 


William M. Clancy
 
Historical compensation . Mr. Clancy served as senior vice president and corporate controller of Vishay Intertechnology from 2005 until he began functioning as our principal financial officer on November 1, 2009. While serving with Vishay Intertechnology, he was not an executive officer, and his compensation was determined in a manner similar to other members of the non-executive management of Vishay Intertechnology. Non-executive management compensation packages at Vishay Intertechnology have historically been developed to provide a competitive base salary and incentive compensation based on personal objectives and the results of the company. Mr. Clancy does not have an employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology. In accordance with the policy of Vishay Intertechnology described above and implemented to contend with the 2008-2009 recessionary environment, Mr. Clancy’s base salary remained the same in 2009 as in 2008, and he was not awarded a performance bonus in 2009. Mr. Clancy was not awarded any long-term compensation in the form of Vishay Intertechnology equity in 2009. Mr. Clancy s compensation was unchanged after he began functioning as our principal financial officer on November 1, 2009.
 
Performance bonus . For 2009, Mr. Clancy was eligible for a performance bonus of up to 30% of his base salary.  The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Clancy is determined by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee, based on the company’s performance and Mr. Clancy’s individual performance.
 
For 2009, Mr. Clancy’s corporate performance metrics included adjusted operating margin and the attainment of the general and administrative budget, in each case for Vishay Intertechnology.  With respect the adjusted operating margin performance metric, Mr. Clancy would not be eligible to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than or equal to 80% of target.  If actual adjusted operating margin were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to adjusted operating margin, increasing ratably from 0% to 60% of the maximum bonus potential for adjusted operating margin.  Finally, if actual adjusted operating margin were between 100% and 120% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to adjusted operating margin, increasing ratably from 60% to 100% of the maximum bonus potential for adjusted operating margin.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin target for 2009 was $215.5 million, and Mr. Clancy would have been entitled to receive a bonus of 15% of his base salary based on achievement of adjusted operating margin at 120% of target.  Because the actual adjusted operating margin was less than 80% of the target, Mr. Clancy did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the adjusted operating margin component.
 
Mr. Clancy was eligible to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to 3.75% of his base salary based on the attainment of the general and administrative budget.  The general and administrative budget target for 2009 was $3.4 million.  Because the actual general and administrative budget was within the budget, Mr. Clancy earned $7,669, equal to 3.75% of his base salary, with respect to the general and administrative budget component of his bonus.
 
- 111 -
 


Finally, Mr. Clancy was eligible to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to 11.25% of his base salary based on the achievement of individual performance goals. The individual performance goals are established by the Chief Accounting Officer of Vishay Intertechnology in consultation with Mr. Clancy at the beginning of each calendar year, and the Vishay Intertechnology Chief Accounting Officer determines the extent to which the performance goals are met following the end of each year. For 2009, Mr. Clancy's individual performance goals and related bonus opportunity as a percentage of base salary (in parentheses) included the assumption of a management role in the Ecomal Israel subsidiary to assist the Ecomal Israel controller in attention to internal controls (2.25%), meeting with the four regional controllers at least once a year to aid in the optimization of internal controls in their respective regions in 2009 (3.375%), continuing to work with the management team to improve the cash flows reporting system (2.25%), continuing to make improvements in the reporting of board reports (1.6875%), assisting senior management in taking on more responsibility for the 2009 audit and ensuring that deadlines were met, and assisting the new vice president of Internal Audit (1.6875%).
 
Nevertheless, as noted above under “Response to the Global Recession,” the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology determined not to award any performance bonuses for 2009, in consideration of the challenging business environment during the year. Because bonuses were foregone, performance objective achievement was not quantified.  However, Vishay Intertechnology management estimates that Mr. Clancy would have been eligible for a bonus of between $25,500 and $30,600 based on the achievement of his individual performance goals and the attainment of his general and administrative budget.
 
Mr. Clancy participates in the Vishay Intertechnology nonqualified deferred compensation plan to which Vishay Intertechnology contributed on his behalf and receives certain customary perquisites related to his employment.
 
Mr. Clancy also participated in the Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan, which provides defined benefits to U.S. employees whose benefits under the qualified pension plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code. This plan was contributory and, other than the fact that it is nonqualified under ERISA, provides substantially the same benefits that are available under Vishay Intertechnology’s qualified retirement plan. Effective January 1, 2009, the U.S. pension plans have been frozen. Benefits accumulated as of December 31, 2008 will be paid to employees upon retirement, but no further benefits will accrue beyond that date.
 
Under the standard severance practice of Vishay Intertechnology in the United States for employees of Mr. Clancy’s rank, upon termination without cause, Mr. Clancy would be entitled to receive twelve weeks’ severance in exchange for executing a release and non-disparagement agreement, plus one week of severance for each year of service with Vishay Intertechnology. If Mr. Clancy were to have been terminated at December 31, 2009, he would have been entitled to receive approximately $134,000 in severance. Mr. Clancy would also receive accrued benefits under the Vishay Nonqualified Retirement Plan (present value of $185,719 at December 31, 2009) in the event of a termination for any reason, as well as his accumulated balance in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan ($150,921 at December 31, 2009).
 
2010 compensation . Until the distribution date, Mr. Clancy will be compensated in accordance with current practice at Vishay Intertechnology. In light of the pending spin-off, Mr. Clancy’s base compensation through the distribution date will be paid at the same level for 2010 as in 2009.
 
- 112 -
 


Thomas P. Kieffer
 
Historical compensation . Mr. Kieffer has served as senior vice president for corporate research and development for Vishay Intertechnology s Measurements Group and Foil Resistors Division since January 1, 2008.   Prior to that, Mr. Kieffer was senior vice president of Vishay Intertechnology’s Micro-Measurements and Load Cells Divisions.  While serving with Vishay Intertechnology, he was not an executive officer, and his compensation was determined in a manner similar to other members of the non-executive management of Vishay Intertechnology. Non-executive management compensation packages at Vishay Intertechnology have historically been developed to provide a competitive base salary and incentive compensation based on personal objectives and the results of the company. Mr. Kieffer does not have an employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology. In accordance with the policy of Vishay Intertechnology described above and implemented to contend with the 2008-2009 recessionary environment, Mr. Kieffer’s base salary remained the same in 2009 as in 2008, and he was not awarded a performance bonus in 2009. Mr. Kieffer was not awarded any long-term compensation in the form of Vishay Intertechnology equity in 2009.
 
Performance bonus . For 2009, Mr. Kieffer was eligible for a performance bonus of up to 35% of his base salary.  The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Kieffer is determined by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee, based on the company’s performance and Mr. Kieffer’s individual performance.

For 2009, Mr. Kieffer’s corporate performance metrics included divisional adjusted operating margin the Micro-Measurements division, Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin, and inventory turnover for the Micro-Measurements division.  With respect each of the Micro-Measurements division and the Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin performance metrics, Mr. Kieffer would not be eligible to receive a bonus with respect to such metric if actual performance under that metric were less than or equal to 80% of target for that metric.  If actual adjusted operating margin were between 80% and 100% of target for one of those metrics, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to such metric, increasing ratably from 0% to 60% of the maximum bonus potential for such metric.  Finally, if actual adjusted operating margin were between 100% and 120% of target for one of those metrics, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to such metric, increasing ratably from 60% to 100% of the maximum bonus potential for such metric.
 
Mr. Kieffer’s divisional adjusted operating margin target for the Micro-Measurements division for 2009 was $16.3 million, and Mr. Kieffer would have received a 2009 bonus equal to 17.5% of his base salary based on the achievement of 120% of that target level.  Because the actual adjusted operating margin was less than 80% of the target, Mr. Kieffer did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the Micro-Measurements divisional adjusted operating margin component.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin target for 2009 was $215.5 million, and Mr. Kieffer would have received a 2009 bonus equal to 7.5% of his base salary based on the achievement of 120% of that target level.  Because the actual adjusted operating margin was less than 80% of the target, Mr. Kieffer did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin component.
 
- 113 -
 


Mr. Kieffer was eligible to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to 5% of his base salary based on achievement of the divisional inventory turnover target for the Micro-Measurements division.  The divisional inventory turnover target for 2009 was 3.58x.  Because the actual divisional inventory turnover amount was less than the target, Mr. Kieffer did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the divisional inventory turnover component.
 
Finally, Mr. Kieffer was eligible to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to 5% of his base salary based on the achievement of individual performance goals. The individual performance goals are established by the Chief Operating Officer of Vishay Intertechnology in consultation with Mr. Kieffer at the beginning of each calendar year, and the Vishay Intertechnology Chief Operating Officer determines the extent to which the performance goals are met following the end of each year. For 2009, Mr. Keiffer's individual performance goals and related bonus opportunity as a percentage of base salary (in parentheses) included achieving $600,000 of cost reduction without a freeze in employee compensation, versus the 2009 budget (2%), limiting capital expenditures to $350,000 (0.5%), completing a specified product development solution in a timely manner (0.5%), achieving specified sales and technology advances in a truck weighing system (0.5%), releasing new sensors technology to production (0.5%), generating divisional purchasing savings in 2009 of 3% versus 2008 (0.5%), and providing miniature strain gage technology sensors to customers in the pressure market segment (0.5%).
 
As noted above under “Response to the Global Recession,” the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology determined not to award any performance bonuses, in consideration of the challenging business environment during the year. Because bonuses were foregone, performance objective achievement was not quantified.  However, Vishay Intertechnology management estimates that Mr. Kieffer would have been eligible for a bonus of between $4,700 and $9,400 based on the achievement of his individual performance goals.
 
Mr. Kieffer participates in the Vishay Intertechnology nonqualified deferred compensation plan and receives certain customary perquisites related to his employment.
 
Under the standard severance practice of Vishay Intertechnology in the United States for employees of Mr. Kieffer’s rank, upon termination without cause, Mr. Kieffer would be entitled to receive twelve weeks’ severance in exchange for executing a release and non-disparagement agreement, plus one week of severance for each year of service with Vishay Intertechnology. If Mr. Kieffer were to have been terminated at December 31, 2009, he would have been entitled to receive approximately $138,000 in severance. Mr. Kieffer would also receive his accumulated balance in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan ($856,040 at December 31, 2009) in the event of a termination for any reason.
 
2010 compensation . Until the distribution date, Mr. Kieffer will be compensated in accordance with current practice at Vishay Intertechnology. In light of the pending spin-off, Mr. Kieffer’s base compensation through the distribution date will be paid at the same level for 2010 as in 2009.
 
- 114 -
 


HISTORICAL COMPENSATION TABLES
 
The information set forth in the following tables reflects compensation earned by Mr. Ziv Shoshani, Mr. William Clancy, and Mr. Thomas Kieffer based upon services rendered to Vishay Intertechnology through October 31, 2009 and services rendered to our company from November 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. The services rendered to Vishay Intertechnology by the Named Executive Officers through October 31, 2009 were different than the services being rendered to our company in their current positions as executive officers. The information below is not indicative of the compensation that the Named Executive Officers will receive as executive officers of our company following the distribution date. See “2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision Group.”
 
The information included in the table should be read in conjunction with the footnotes which follow, the descriptions of the employment agreements with Mr. Shoshani described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the “Grants of Plan Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “Pension Benefits,” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” tables on the pages which follow.
 
Name and Principal Position
(a)
     Year
(b)
     Salary
(1)
($)
(c)
     Stock Awards
(2)
($)
(e)
       Option Awards
(3)
($)
(f)
         
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(4)
($)
(g)
 
     Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred Comp.
Earnings
(5) (6)
($)
(h)
     All Other
Comp.
(7)
($)
(i)
     Total
($)
(j)
Ziv Shoshani   2009   $   305,359   $    69,700   $    -   $    - $    8,957   $    222,385   $    606,401
President and Chief Executive   2008     334,819     57,100     -   39,341   3,664     297,824     732,748
       Officer designee   2007     281,724     68,750     356,250   69,586   -     206,563     982,873
 
William M. Clancy   2009     204,516     -     -   -     30,855     48,661     284,032
Executive Vice President and Chief   2008     204,516     -     -   39,144   23,940     37,692     305,292
       Financial Officer designee   2007     197,600     -     -   40,014   46,112     35,430     319,156
                                          
Thomas P. Kieffer   2009     188,455     -     -   -   -     33,598     222,053
Sr. Vice President and Chief   2008     188,455     -     -   28,348   -     31,940     248,743
       Technical Officer designee   2007     182,109     -     -   29,143   -     35,039     246,291

- 115 -
 


(1)   Column (c) reflects base salary earned during each year and, for Messrs. Clancy and Kieffer, includes amounts deferred in accordance with the provisions of Vishay Intertechnology’s 401(k) and deferred compensation plans. The employment agreement for Mr. Shoshani specifies that his salary be denominated and paid in foreign currency (Israeli shekel). The amounts presented above have been converted into U.S. dollars at the weighted-average exchange rate for the year.
      
(2)   Column (e) represents the grant-date fair value of 5,000 phantom stock units awarded annually to Mr. Shoshani pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, and the grant-date fair value of restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Shoshani. No amounts are included for performance-based restricted stock units for which performance objectives were not achieved. Note that for financial statement reporting purposes, the amount of compensation expense for restricted stock units is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the respective awards. The grant-date fair value does not necessarily reflect the value of shares actually received or which may be received in the future with respect to these awards. There can be no assurance that the grant-date fair value of these awards will ever be realized.
      
(3)   Column (f) represents the grant-date fair value of stock options granted to Mr. Shoshani during 2007. The grant-date fair value is recognized over the vesting periods of the respective awards. There can be no assurance that the grant-date fair value of these awards will ever be realized. The assumptions used in computing the grant-date fair value are detailed in Note 11 to our combined and consolidated financial statements, included in this information statement. No stock options were exercised in 2009.
 
(4)   Column (g) represents bonuses paid to the named executive officers.  No bonuses were paid for 2009 due to the temporary suspension of the bonus program in response to the unprecedented global recession.
     
(5)   Column (h) reflects the change in the actuarial present value of the named executive officer’s pension and other postemployment benefits under respective defined benefit retirement plans, from the plan measurement date used in preparing the prior year combined and consolidated financial statements to the plan measurement date used in preparing the current year combined and consolidated financial statements, determined using the same interest rate, mortality, and other actuarial assumptions used in our consolidated financial statements. See the “Pension Benefits” table for more information on the benefits payable to the named executive officers under their respective pension plans. No amounts are presented for Mr. Shoshani for 2007 because changes in actuarial assumptions reduced the present value of his accumulated benefit by $222.
 
(6)   The named executive officers also participate in the Vishay Intertechnology nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which amounts deferred are credited with earnings based on the performance of notional investment options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited during the years presented was “above market” or “preferential.” Consequently, no deferred compensation plan earnings are included in the amounts reported in Column (h). See the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table for more information on the benefits payable under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
 
(7)   All other compensation includes amounts deposited on behalf of each named executive officer into Vishay Intertechnology’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan pursuant to the employment agreements with each named executive officer, personal use of company car, company match on 401(k) contributions, benefits generally available to employees in Israel, and other perquisites, as described below (asterisk denotes amounts paid in foreign currency and translated at average exchange rates for the year):

         2009        2008        2007         
Ziv Shoshani   $ 100,000   $ 100,000   $ 100,000   Company contribution to nonqualified deferred compensation plan
      15,638     12,871     9,537   Personal use of Company car*
      79,700     157,906     70,892   Israeli employment benefits*
      27,047     27,047     26,134   Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
    $ 222,385   $ 297,824   $ 206,563    
     
William M. Clancy   $ 4,697   $ 387   $ 432   Company contribution to nonqualified deferred compensation plan
      13,855     13,828     12,300   Personal use of Company car
      9,346     4,213     4,057   Company match to 401(k) plan
      20,763     19,264     18,641   Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
    $ 48,661   $ 37,692   $ 35,430    
 
Thomas P. Kieffer   $ 6,063   $ 5,070   $ 6,467   Personal use of Company car
      11,307     11,307     13,489   Company match to 401(k) plan
      16,228     15,563     15,083   Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
    $ 33,598   $ 31,940   $ 35,039  
   
- 116 -
 


Grants of Plan Based Awards
 
The following table provides information with regard to plan based awards granted to each named executive officer in 2009. The information included in the table should be read in conjunction with the footnotes which follow and the description of Vishay Intertechnology’s Senior Executive Phantom Stock Plan described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
 
Name Grant Estimated Future Payouts Under All Other Stock Grant Date Fair
Date Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Awards: Number Value of Stock
(2) of Shares of and Option
Stock or Units Awards
(#)
Threshold Target Maximum (1)
($) ($) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (i) (l)
Ziv 1/2/2009 - - - 5,000 $18,000
Shoshani
4/23/2009 - - - 10,000 $51,200
1/2/2009 - $93,134 $129,778 - -
William 1/2/2009 - $49,084 $61,355 - -
Clancy  
Thomas 1/2/2009 - $47,114 $65,959 - -
Kieffer

(1)   Includes awards of fully vested phantom stock granted effective January 2, 2009 and awards of restricted stock units granted effective April 23, 2009, which vest over time as described in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End” table below.
     
(2)         For 2009, each executive officer was eligible to earn an annual performance bonus based on the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals, as described above for each executive under “Performance bonus”. The maximum bonus Mr. Shoshani was eligible to receive, assuming maximum achievement of each performance goal, was 42.5% of his base salary. The maximum bonus Mr. Clancy was eligible to receive, assuming maximum achievement of each performance goal, was 30% of his base salary. The maximum bonus Mr. Kieffer was eligible to receive, assuming maximum achievement of each performance goal, was 35% of his base salary.
 
- 117 -
 


Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End
 
The following table provides information regarding unexercised stock  options and unvested stock awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2009:
 
Option Awards Stock Awards
Name         Grant
Date (1)
        Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
        Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
        Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
        Option
Exercise
Price ($)
        Option
Expiration
Date
        Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(2)
        Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
Ziv Shoshani 10/12/2000 12,000 - - $      25.13 10/12/2010 - -
2/27/2007 8,334 16,666 - $ 14.25 2/27/2017 - -
4/23/2009 - - - 6,668 $      55,678
Total 20,334 16,666 - 6,668 55,678
 
William M. Clancy 10/12/2000 12,000 - - $ 25.13 10/12/2010 - -
Total 12,000 - - - -
                                          
Thomas P. Kieffer   10/12/2000   6,000   6,000   -   $ 25.13   10/12/2010   -     -
Total       6,000                            

(1) Options granted on February 27, 2007 vest in six equal annual installments beginning on February 27, 2008. Options granted on October 12, 2000 vested in six equal annual installments beginning on October 12, 2001.
         
(2) Of the 10,000 RSUs granted on April 23, 2009, 1,665 vested immediately, and the remainder will vest in five consecutive annual installments, as nearly equal in size as possible, beginning on May 28, 2009.
 
- 118 -
 


Option Exercises and Stock Vested
 
The following table provides information with regard to amounts paid to or received by our named executive officers during 2009 as a result of the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units.
 
Stock Awards
Number of
Shares Value
Acquired on Realized on
Name Vesting (#) Vesting
(a)         (d)         (e)
Ziv Shoshani 3,332 $      17,693

Pension Benefits
 
Vishay Intertechnology maintains various retirement benefit plans and arrangements.
 
As part of his employment agreement, Mr. Shoshani and his surviving spouse are entitled to receive medical coverage up to a $15,000 annual premium value for life. These benefits are fully vested.
 
In the United States, Vishay Intertechnology maintained a pension plan which provides defined benefits to U.S. employees whose benefits under the qualified pension plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code. This plan was contributory and, other than the fact that it is nonqualified under ERISA, provides substantially the same benefits that are available under Vishay Intertechnology’s qualified retirement plan. Employees with five or more years of service were entitled to annual pension benefits beginning at normal retirement age on the first day of the month following the participant’s 65th birthday equal to the sum of 2.1% of the first $10,000 of earnings plus 2.64% of the annual earnings in excess of $10,000 with a new pension unit earned each year. The final pension is the sum of all units earned during the employee’s career. The plan permits early retirement if the participant is at least age 55 and has at least five years of service. Employees may elect to receive their pension benefits in the form of a joint and survivor annuity or other contingent annuities. Employees are 100% vested immediately in their contributions. If employees terminate before rendering five years of service, they forfeit the right to receive the portion of their accumulated plan benefits attributable to Vishay Intertechnology’s contributions. Employees receive their benefits as a life annuity payable monthly from retirement. Payments will not be less than the greater of (a) the employee’s accumulated contributions plus interest or (b) an annuity for five years. Effective January 1, 2009, the U.S. pension plans have been frozen. Benefits accumulated as of December 31, 2008 will be paid to employees upon retirement, but no further benefits will accrue beyond that date. To mitigate the loss in benefits of these employees, effective January 1, 2009, Vishay Intertechnology increased the company-match portion of its 401(k) defined contribution savings plan for employees impacted by the pension freeze. Mr. Clancy is the only executive officer that participates in this plan.
 
- 119 -
 


The following table provides information regarding the present value of benefits accrued under these retirement benefit plans and arrangements:
 
Name
(a)
        Plan Name
(b)
        Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)
(c)
        Present Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit (1)
($)
(d)
        Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
(e)
Ziv Shoshani Individual contractual n/a $      36,569 $      -
postemployment medical
arrangement
 
William M. Vishay Nonqualified 13.5 $ 185,719 $ -
Clancy Retirement Plan (2)

(1)         These amounts have been calculated using interest rate, mortality, and other actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for financial reporting purposes set forth in Note 10 to our combined and consolidated financial statements included in this information statement.
 
(2) Mr. Clancy elected to begin participating in this plan effective July 1, 1995, and received no credit for prior service. The Vishay Nonqualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2009, such that participants accrued no additional benefits.
 
- 120 -
 


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
 
The named executive officers participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which is available to all employees which meet certain criteria under the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Shoshani is entitled under his employment agreement to annual contributions by Vishay Intertechnology to this plan. The named executive officers are also eligible to elect to defer additional amounts of compensation, subject to certain limitations.
 
While deferred, amounts are credited with “earnings” based on the performance of notional investment options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited during 2009 was “above market” or “preferential.”
 
The following table sets forth information relating to the activity in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan accounts of the named executive officers during 2009 and the aggregate balance of the accounts as of December 31, 2009:
 
Name
(a)
        Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year
($)
(b)
        Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year (1)
($)
(c)
        Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal
Year
($)
(d)
        Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e)
        Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End
($)
(f)
Ziv Shoshani $ - $      100,000 $      23,310 - $      636,957
William M. Clancy 1,166 4,697 31,322 - 150,921
Thomas P. Kieffer     6,000     -     192   -     856,040
____________________
 
(1)         These amounts are included in Column (i) of the “Summary Compensation Table” as a component of “All Other Compensation.” No portion of the earnings credited during 2009 was “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, no amounts related to earnings on deferred compensation have been included in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

- 121 -
 


2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision Group
 
The strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology, with input from management of Vishay Intertechnology and the advice of independent compensation consultants referred to below, took the lead in crafting the initial compensation arrangements with our executive officers. The committees negotiated with Mr. Shoshani and his counsel and counsel for our company regarding his arrangements, and Mr. Shoshani, in his capacity as our principal executive officer, also had substantial input on the compensation of our other two executive officers. The strategic affairs committee was involved in these compensation matters because of the potential conflicts of interest in setting the compensation principally of Mr. Shoshani. Mr. Shoshani is related to Dr. Felix Zandman, the executive chairman of the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology, who will control approximately 45% of the outstanding voting power of our company following the separation. We anticipate that, prior to the distribution date, each of our executive officers will execute a letter of understanding with us and Vishay Intertechnology regarding their compensation as described in this section. The terms of the employment of the executive officers will be finalized as soon as practicable following the distribution date with the compensation committee of our board of directors. We anticipate that at that time Mr. Shoshani will enter into an employment agreement that he will negotiate with the committee. Until the distribution date, each of the executive officers will remain subject to his existing employment arrangements with Vishay Intertechnology or its subsidiaries. Upon entering into an employment agreement with our company, Mr. Shoshani’s existing employment agreement will terminate on the spin-off date.
 
Compensation Consultants
 
To assist in formulating the initial compensation arrangements of our executive officers, the strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology retained the services of two compensation consulting firms, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) and Farient Advisors LLC. These compensation consultants were engaged directly by the committees, although in the course of their engagement they also met with Mr. Shoshani and members of the management of Vishay Intertechnology to obtain their input and views. The consultants’ assignment included assisting the committees in the formulation of the compensation arrangements for our executive officers, particularly for Mr. Shoshani, assessing the reasonableness and interrelation of the individual elements of the compensation packages and providing input to the committees with respect to current compensation practices among comparable public companies and in comparable transactions. PwC has been previously engaged by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee to assist it in executive compensation matters, including the 2009 amendment to Dr. Zandman’s employment agreement. Farient was recommended to the committees by management of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Compensation Philosophy
 
In formulating the compensation arrangements for our executive officers, the strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology were guided generally by the executive compensation philosophy employed by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee with respect to the executive compensation of that company. The committees believed that the compensation packages should combine base salary with an opportunity for annual cash bonuses and also include long-term equity awards designed to align the interests of senior management with the long-term interests of the company’s stockholders. In crafting the compensation of our executive officers, however, the committees also took account of the fact that at the time of the distribution we will be a substantially smaller company than our current parent. The committees, with advice from management, also believed that the executives should receive recognition for the substantial efforts that they invested in preparation for the spin-off, in the form of founder’s equity grants that align executive interests with those of stockholders in achieving long-term growth in our company’s equity value. Finally, in the case of Mr. Shoshani, in order to induce him to join our company, the committees felt that it was appropriate to compensate Mr. Shoshani in part in respect of the future opportunities with Vishay Intertechnology that he will forgo when he joins our company. The committees believe that the elements of compensation negotiated with our executives will reward intrinsically sound management decisions and will not encourage risk-taking to enhance short-term profitability at the expense of the long-term health and viability of our company. As discussed above, the compensation committee did not set compensation for Vishay Intertechnology executives within a specific range of compensation data. The strategic affairs and compensation committees, in setting compensation for our company’s executive officers, did set such compensation within a specific range of compensation data, as discussed below.
 
Elements of Compensation
 
Base Salaries .  After considering the salaries and compensation practices of executive officers of comparable public companies identified by the compensation consultants, the executive officers’ base salaries were based on a determination by the committees that it was appropriate to establish such salaries within the market-competitive range of compensation offered to similarly situated executives of comparable public companies. The committees determined that establishing the salaries within the range of salaries for similarly situated executives at comparable public companies would meet their fairness and competitive goals for our executive officers’ salaries. The committees therefore set the base salaries for each of our executive officers within the market-competitive range for their respective positions. Based on input from the compensation consultants referred to above, the market-competitive ranges were determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles of compensation data for such comparable companies. These ranges were: $367,000 to $463,000 for the chief executive officer; $216,000 to $259,000 for the chief financial officer; and $192,000 to $307,000 for the chief technology officer.
 
- 122 -
 


The committees believed that setting our executive officers’ salaries within such ranges was appropriate to induce the executive officers to join our company and to retain them for the desired period.  In addition to the previously identified factors, the executive officers’ salary increases also reflected consideration of their performance and the increased responsibilities in connection with their new positions at our company.  With respect to Mr. Shoshani, the committees concluded that his salary was appropriate in light of the future opportunities he will forgo when he joins our company.  Therefore, Mr. Shoshani’s base salary accounted for his prior and potential salary with Vishay Intertechnology, and his demonstrated ability to run our company and serve as our chief executive officer.
 
The variations in base salary of each of our executive officers were established to compensate each of them at the appropriate market-competitive level according to their respective positions, duties and responsibilities.
 
Performance Bonus .  The committees also considered the annual bonuses paid to executive officers of the comparable public companies identified by the compensation consultants in determining the appropriate target bonuses for our executive officers.  In establishing the target bonuses, the committees determined that it was appropriate to set such target bonuses within the market-competitive range of bonuses granted by such comparable public companies.  Similar to base salary, the committees believed that such target bonuses were necessary to attract the executive officers to our company and retain them during the desired period.  Additionally, the committees set the target bonuses at levels that it concluded would not encourage excessive risk-taking in light of the applicable performance goals and that it considered appropriate to compensate each executive officer in connection with their different responsibilities at our company.  The target bonuses of each of our executive officers were established to compensative each of them at the appropriate market-competitive level according to their respective positions, duties and responsibilities.
 
The performance bonuses for the executive officers of Vishay Precision Group for 2010 are based on achievement of two corporate objectives, consisting of our adjusted operating margin (as defined above) and our EBITDA (earnings determined in accordance with GAAP, before interest expense (income), income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization).  The target levels of adjusted operating margin and EBITDA for 2010 are $18 million and $28 million, respectively, and one-half of the bonus potential for each executive officer is attributable to the achievement of each of these performance objectives.  Individual bonus terms are discussed with respect to each of our executive officers below, under “Employment Terms.”
 
Equity Compensation .  The committees believed that the grant of equity awards was the primary component for aligning the interests of the executive officers with the long-term interests of the company’s stockholders.  Accordingly, the committees considered the extent to which the grant of equity awards would reward each executive officer for increasing stockholder value and such executive officer’s role in our company’s performance.
 
In establishing the amount of equity awards, the committees utilized the market-competitive range of equity awards granted to similarly situated executive officers of comparable public companies.  The committees concluded that a grant of equity awards within such market-competitive range was appropriate to reward and incentivize our executive officers.  The amount of equity awards granted to each of our executive officers was further determined suitable in light of the specific positions, duties and responsibilities of each executive officer.  The equity awards provided to each of our executive officers were established to compensate each of them at the appropriate market-competitive medial level according to their respective positions, duties and responsibilities, as well as to recognize their individual ability to affect stockholder value creation.
 
In recognition for the substantial efforts that our executives officers invested in preparation for the spin-off, the committees determined award founder’s equity grants to the executives, which serve to align their interests with those of stockholders in achieving long-term growth in our company’s equity value.
 
Total Compensation .  In determining the total compensation for our executive officers, the committees considered the compensation packages given to similarly situated executive officers of comparable public companies. The committees believed that it was appropriate to offer total compensation to our executive officers within the market-competitive range of total compensation provided by such comparable public companies. Based on input from the compensation consultants referred to above, the market-competitive ranges were determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles of compensation data for such comparable companies. These ranges were: $956,000 to $1,418,000 for the chief executive officer; $431,000 to $713,000 for the chief financial officer; and $272,000 to $602,000 for the chief technology officer. Consistent with the compensation philosophy of Vishay Intertechnology, the total compensation package for each of our executive officers was established by balancing base salary against target bonus and equity compensation. The committees concluded that the total compensation packages properly balanced base salary against annual bonus and equity grants such that the total compensation would not encourage excessive risk-taking by our executive officers.
 
- 123 -
 


Employment Terms
 
The following terms of employment have been agreed to among our executive officers and Vishay Intertechnology and us. Vishay Intertechnology acted in each case upon the recommendations of its strategic affairs and compensation committees. At this time, none of our executive officers have entered into employment contracts with us, although Mr. Shoshani is expected to enter into a three-year employment agreement as soon as practicable following the distribution date. Accordingly, the arrangements described below are subject to review by the compensation committee of our board of directors following the distribution date, and the terms described could change. However, we do not anticipate that any changes, if made, will be material.
 
Ziv Shoshani
 
Mr. Shoshani will be employed as the President and Chief Executive Officer of our company and, following the distribution date, will enter into an employment contract for a term of three years.
 
Cash compensation . Mr. Shoshani will receive a base salary of $420,000, payable in Israeli currency based on the average exchange rate during the preceding calendar year. In addition, Mr. Shoshani will be eligible for an annual cash performance bonus of up to 200% of base salary.  As described above, the two performance metrics for 2010 include adjusted operating margin and EBITDA, with each of the performance metrics accounting for one-half of Mr. Shoshani’s bonus potential.  For each performance metric, Mr. Shoshani would not be eligible to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than 80% of target.  If actual achievement of a performance metric were exactly 80% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be eligible to receive 50% of his maximum bonus potential with respect to that performance metric.  If actual achievement of a performance metric were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 50% to 75% of the maximum bonus potential for that performance metric.  Finally, if actual achievement of a performance metric were between 100% and 150% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 75% to 200% of the maximum bonus potential for that performance metric. The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Shoshani will be determined by our compensation committee following the end of the year, based on the level of achievement of the performance objectives.
 
Equity compensation . Mr. Shoshani will be eligible for an annual long-term equity incentive award with a target value equal to 100% of base salary. The form of the annual equity award will be as determined by our compensation committee. Mr. Shoshani will also receive a founder’s equity grant having a total value of $800,000. The grant will take the form of restricted stock units (RSUs), all of which will vest three years from the distribution date. The RSUs will also vest on a change of control and in certain other circumstances to be determined by our compensation committee. The number of shares subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the founder s equity grant by the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
 
Special bonuses . Mr. Shoshani will receive from us a cash sign-on bonus of $400,000 upon the successful completion of the spin-off. Mr. Shoshani will be obligated to repay this bonus if he terminates his employment with us during the initial three-year term of his employment contract, other than termination for good reason, death or disability. Mr. Shoshani will also receive a one-time cash bonus from Vishay Intertechnology in the amount of $600,000 upon the successful completion of the spin-off. Corporate or individual performance following the spin-off will not affect Mr. Shoshani s right to receive or retain this special bonus from Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Severance . If Mr. Shoshani’s employment is terminated without cause or if he terminates his employment with us for good reason, he will be entitled to receive cash severance in an amount equal to two years’ base salary plus a prorated amount of this target bonus for the year of termination. Mr. Shoshani will also be entitled to a customary continuation of benefits. Mr. Shoshani will not be entitled to a tax gross-up in respect of any parachute payment tax imposed on his severance benefits, and, if a tax of this nature would otherwise be imposed, the severance payments will be cut back to the extent necessary to avoid this tax.
 
Other . Mr. Shoshani will be entitled to such other benefits, including retirement benefits, as may be approved by our compensation committee following the distribution date. He will also be subject to a customary non-competition agreement for a period of two years following termination of his employment with us. “Cause,” “good reason” and “change of control” will be as defined in Mr. Shoshani’s employment agreement.
 
Mr. Shoshani will also be entitled to receive certain benefits generally available to employees in Israel on a non-discriminatory basis. For a description of these benefits, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Ziv Shoshani” above.
 
- 124 -
 


William M. Clancy
 
Mr. Clancy will be employed as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
 
Cash compensation . Mr. Clancy will receive a base salary of $250,000. In addition, Mr. Clancy will be eligible for an annual cash performance bonus of up to 80% of base salary.  As described above, the two performance metrics for 2010 include adjusted operating margin and EBITDA, with each of the performance metrics accounting for one-half of Mr. Clancy’s bonus potential.  For each performance metric, Mr. Clancy would not be eligible to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than 80% of target.  If actual achievement of a performance metric were exactly 80% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to receive 26.7% of his maximum bonus potential with respect to that performance metric.  If actual achievement of a performance metric were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 26.7% to 40% of the maximum bonus potential for that performance metric.  Finally, if actual achievement of a performance metric were between 100% and 150% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 40% to 80% of the maximum bonus potential for that performance metric. The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Clancy will be determined by our compensation committee following the end of the year, based on the level of achievement of the performance objectives.
 
Equity compensation . Mr. Clancy will be eligible for an annual long-term equity incentive award with a target value equal to 40% of base salary. The form of the annual equity award will be as determined by our compensation committee. Mr. Clancy will also receive a founder’s equity grant having a total value of $100,000. The grant will take the form of RSUs, all of which will vest three years from the distribution date. The number of shares subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the founder’s equity grant by the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
 
Thomas P. Kieffer
 
Mr. Kieffer will be employed as our Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer.
 
Cash compensation . Mr. Kieffer will receive a base salary of $225,000. In addition, Mr. Kieffer will be eligible for an annual cash performance bonus of up to 60% of base salary.  As described above, the two performance metrics for 2010 include adjusted operating margin and EBITDA, with each of the performance metrics accounting for one-half of Mr. Kieffer’s bonus potential.  For each performance metric, Mr. Kieffer would not be eligible to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than 80% of target.  If actual achievement of a performance metric were exactly 80% of target, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive 20% of his maximum bonus potential with respect to that performance metric.  If actual achievement of a performance metric were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 20% to 30% of the maximum bonus potential for that performance metric.  Finally, if actual achievement of a performance metric were between 100% and 150% of target, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 30% to 60% of the maximum bonus potential for that performance metric. The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Kieffer will be determined by our compensation committee following the end of the year, based on the level of achievement of the performance objectives.
 
Equity compensation . Mr. Kieffer will be eligible for an annual long-term equity incentive award with a target value equal to 30% of base salary. The form of the annual equity award will be as determined by our compensation committee. Mr. Kieffer will also receive a founder’s equity grant having a total value of $100,000. The grant will take the form of RSUs, all of which will vest three years from the distribution date. The number of shares subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the founder s equity grant by the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
 
- 125 -
 


Other Compensation Considerations
 
Tax deductibility of executive compensation
 
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits to $1 million the annual tax deduction for compensation paid to each of the chief executive officer and any of the other three highest paid executive officers. However, compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation is deductible even in excess of $1 million. In connection with the formulation of the compensation arrangements for our executive officers, the strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology reviewed and considered the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, and we anticipate that our compensation committee will do the same after it is established.
 
In certain situations, our compensation committee may approve compensation that will not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m), in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for its executive officers. Some of Mr. Shoshani’s compensation for 2010 may not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m).
 
Nonqualified deferred compensation
 
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law, adding Section 409A to the Internal Revenue Code, which changed the tax rules applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. A violation of these new rules could result in the imposition of a 20% penalty tax on the affected executives. We believe that we are operating in compliance with Section 409A. We anticipate that our compensation committee will monitor compliance with Section 409A.
 
Perquisites
 
Our compensation committee is expected to follow a policy on providing perquisites to our executive officers similar to the policy of Vishay Intertechnology. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components” above.
 
- 126 -
 


Equity Awards
 
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program
 
As discussed, we anticipate that equity compensation will be a component of our executive compensation structure. We are therefore adopting with the approval of Vishay Intertechnology, as our sole stockholder, the Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program (the “2010 Program”). The following is a summary of certain aspects of the 2010 Program, but it is qualified by reference to the full text of the program which is filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this information statement is a part.
 
Administration
 
The 2010 Program will be administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors. It is intended that the members of our compensation committee always will be “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, but no award under the program will be invalidated if the compensation committee is not so constituted. If our board of directors so determines, the board may act as the compensation committee for purposes of administering the 2010 Program. Also, the board of directors will administer the 2010 Program with respect to awards granted to non-employee directors. The compensation committee will have the authority to determine the individuals to whom awards will be granted and the terms and provisions of the awards; to exercise all of the powers granted to it under the 2010 Program; to construe, interpret and implement the 2010 Program and all related agreements; to prescribe, amend, and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2010 Program, including rules governing its own operations; to make all determinations necessary or advisable in administering the 2010 Program; to correct any defect or omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the 2010 Program; and to amend the 2010 Program to reflect changes in applicable law.
 
Eligibility
 
Officers and other employees of Vishay Precision Group or a majority-owned subsidiary who are responsible for or contribute to the management, growth, and profitability of the business of our company are eligible to receive grants under the 2010 Program.
 
Maximum number of shares
 
Awards representing up to 500,000 shares of our common stock may be granted under the 2010 Program. The number of shares authorized for grant under the 2010 Program will approximate 4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock on the spin-off date. This number will be adjusted for changes in our capital structure, such as a stock split or stock dividend. Awards that are forfeited by a holder may be re-granted to others, subject to the overall limit. No individual may be granted awards in any one year representing more than 250,000 shares of our common stock.
 
- 127 -
 


Type of Awards
 
The 2010 Program permits the granting of—
  • nonqualified stock options and, in the case of employees who are nonresident foreign nationals, stock appreciation rights that are payable in cash;
  • unrestricted stock;
  • restricted stock; and
  • stock units, including restricted stock units (RSUs) and phantom stock units.
Stock options . Stock options will be exercisable at such times and for such prices as determined by the compensation committee. However, the exercise price of a stock option may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Options will expire on a date determined by our compensation committee at the time of grant but in no event later than ten years from the date of grant. Upon holder’s termination of employment, generally, unvested stock options will expire immediately and vested options will expire shortly after the termination of employment.
 
Unrestricted stock . The compensation committee may grant (or sell at a purchase price at least equal to par value) shares of common stock free of restrictions. Unrestricted stock may be granted as part of another award, for example as an immediately vested component of a restricted stock or stock unit grant.
 
Restricted stock . Restricted stock is subject to vesting based on continued employment with our company and/or upon the achievement of specific performance goals. Prior to vesting, the shares of restricted stock, are not transferable and are forfeitable. The compensation committee may at the time that shares of restricted stock are granted impose additional conditions to the vesting of the shares. Generally, unvested shares of restricted stock and any dividends paid on those shares are automatically and immediately forfeited upon the grant recipient’s termination of employment for any reason.
 
Stock units. A stock unit entitles the recipient to receive a share of common stock on a specified date or the occurrence of a specified event such as termination of employment. Stock units may be subject to vesting, in which case they are commonly referred to as restricted stock units or RSUs, or they may be fully vested at the time of grant, in which case they are sometimes referred to as phantom stock. Vesting of stock units may be based on continued employment with the company and/or upon the achievement of specific performance goals. The compensation committee may at the time that stock units are granted impose additional conditions to the vesting of the stock units. Generally, unvested stock units are forfeited upon the grant recipient’s termination of employment for any reason.
 
- 128 -
 


Performance goals
 
The compensation committee may provide that the grant or vesting schedule of an award of stock options, unrestricted stock, phantom stock, restricted stock or stock units is based or partially based on the achievement of specified performance goals. Stock units whose vesting depends on the achievement of performance goals are sometimes referred to as performance stock units or PSUs.
 
The performance goals may be expressed in terms of one or more of the following criteria: earnings; adjusted net income (or correlative terms); adjusted operating margin (or correlative terms); gross or net sales; cash flow; financial return ratios; total stockholder return; stockholder return based on growth measures or the attainment by our common stock of a specified value for a specified period of time; share price or share price appreciation; value of assets, return or net return on assets, net assets or capital; adjusted pretax margin; margins, profits and expense levels; dividends; market share, market penetration or other performance measures with respect to specific designated products or product groups and/or specific geographic areas; reduction of losses, loss ratios or expense ratios; reduction in fixed costs; operating cost management; cost of capital; debt reduction; productivity improvements; inventory turnover measurements; or customer satisfaction, based on specified objective goals or a company-sponsored customer survey.
 
Performance goals may be expressed with respect to the company as a whole or with respect to one or more divisions or business units; on a pretax or after-tax basis; and on an absolute per share and/or relative basis. In addition, performance goals may employ comparisons with past performance of our company and/or the current or past performance of other companies, and in the case of earnings-based measures, may employ comparisons to capital, stockholders’ equity and shares outstanding.
 
Treatment of Outstanding Vishay Intertechnology Equity Awards
 
For a discussion of the treatment in the spin-off of outstanding equity awards of Vishay Intertechnology held by our officers and employees, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology – Employee Matters Agreement – Equity Awards” below.
 
- 129 -
 


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
 
Vishay Intertechnology currently owns all of our outstanding shares of common stock. Upon completion of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will not beneficially own any shares of our common stock. None of our directors or executive officers currently owns any shares of our common stock, but those who own shares of Vishay Intertechnology will be treated the same as other holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock in any distribution by Vishay Intertechnology and, accordingly, will receive shares of our common stock in the distribution.
 
The following table sets forth the anticipated beneficial ownership of our common stock and Class B common stock by each of our current directors and our directors following the spin-off; each of our executive officers following the spin-off; all of our directors and executive officers following the spin-off as a group; and each of our stockholders who we believe (based on the assumptions described below) will beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or Class B common stock. Except as otherwise noted below, we based the share amounts on each person’s beneficial ownership of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock on June 18, 2010, giving effect to a distribution ratio of one share of our common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and one share of our Class B common stock for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock held by such person. In general, “beneficial ownership” includes those shares a director, director nominee or executive officer has the power to vote, acquire or dispose within 60 days. Except as otherwise noted, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by them.
 
Immediately following the spin-off, we estimate that 12.3 million shares of our common stock and 1.0 million of our Class B common stock will be issued and outstanding, based on the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock expected to be outstanding as of the record date. The actual number of shares of our common stock outstanding following the spin-off will be determined on June 25, 2010, the record date for the spin-off.
 
- 130 -
 


Common Stock Class B Common Stock
Shares of Percent of Shares of Percent of Voting
Name Stock       Class       Stock       Class       Power
Directors and Executive Officers
 
Marc Zandman (1) 543   *     106   *     *
Ziv Shoshani 6,241   *     -   -     *
Samuel Broydo - * -   - *
Saul V. Reibstein - * - - *
Timothy V. Talbert 71 * - - *
William M. Clancy - *   - -     *
Thomas P. Kieffer 2,004 *   - - *
Dr. Lior Yahalomi (2) - * - - *
 
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (8
Persons)  
       c/o Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 8,859 *   106   *   *  
       3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150
       Malvern, PA 19355      
 
Dr. Felix Zandman (3) 3,010 * 1,018,663 99.4 % 45.2 %
       c/o Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
       63 Lancaster Avenue
       Malvern, PA 19355
 
LSV Asset Management (4) 674,554 5.5 % - - 3.0 %
1 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4000
Chicago, IL 60606
 
BlackRock Inc. (5) 1,302,024 10.6 % - - 5.8 %
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
 
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (6) 1,118,921 9.1 % - - 5.0 %
One Wall Street, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10286  

- 131 -
 


* Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of such class or the total voting power, as the case may be.
 
(1)   Includes 53 shares of our Class B common stock anticipated to be directly owned by Marc Zandman and 53 shares of our Class B common stock anticipated to be owned by Marc Zandman’s minor child.
 
(2) Dr. Yahalomi will resign from our board of directors immediately prior to the spin-off.
 
(3)       Includes 44,052 shares of our Class B common stock anticipated to be directly owned by Dr. Felix Zandman; 571,435 shares anticipated to be held in family trusts, of which Dr. Zandman is the trustee and over which Dr. Zandman shares voting and dispositive control with his wife, Mrs. Ruta Zandman; and 403,176 shares anticipated to be held in a voting trust, of which Dr. Zandman is the trustee and over which Dr. Zandman has sole voting control. The shares held in the voting trust consist of 223,862 shares anticipated to be deposited by the Estate of Mrs. Luella B. Slaner and 179,314 shares anticipated to be deposited by Mrs. Slaner’s children and various trusts for the benefit of Mrs. Slaner’s children and grandchildren. The voting trust agreement that governs the voting trust will remain in effect until the earlier of (x) February 1, 2050 or (y) the death or resignation or inability to act of Dr. Zandman, but will terminate at any earlier time upon the due execution and acknowledgment by the trustee of a deed of termination, duly filed with the registered office of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
(4)   Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2010 by LSV Asset Management. According to the Schedule 13G, LSV Asset Management is expected to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 674,554 shares of common stock; and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 674,554 shares.
 
(5)   Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on January 7, 2010 by BlackRock, Inc. According to the Schedule 13G, BlackRock, Inc. is expected to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 1,302,024 shares of common stock; sole power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 1,302,024 shares.
 
(6)   Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 4, 2010 by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.  According to the Schedule 13G, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation is expected to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 1,008,074 shares of common stock, and shared power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 201 shares; and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 1,096,786 shares, and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 427 shares.
 
- 132 -
 


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology
 
Following the spin-off, our company and Vishay Intertechnology will operate separately, each as independent public companies. In order to govern the relationship between our company and Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off and to provide mechanisms for an orderly transition, we and Vishay Intertechnology are entering into certain agreements which will facilitate the spin-off, govern our relationship with Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off and provide for the allocation of employee benefits, tax and other liabilities and obligations. The following is a summary of the terms of the material agreements we are entering into with Vishay Intertechnology prior to the spin-off.
 
Master Separation Agreement
 
The master separation agreement will govern our separation from Vishay Intertechnology, the distribution of shares of our common stock and Class B common stock to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders and other matters related to Vishay Intertechnology’s relationship with us. References in this section to Vishay Intertechnology and us include the parties’ respective subsidiaries as they will exist following the separation. References in this section to ancillary agreements refer to the tax matters agreement, the trademark license agreement, the employee matters agreement, the lease agreements, the transition services agreements, the secondment agreement, the patent license agreement, and the supply agreements, each of which is described below, as well as other agreements between us and Vishay Intertechnology.
 
The Separation
 
In a series of transactions, Vishay Intertechnology has moved and is continuing to move to us its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses, including assets and equity interests of certain subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology, and we have moved and are continuing to move a small amount of assets that we hold and that do not constitute part of our business to Vishay Intertechnology. The master separation agreement provides that the parties will complete these transactions, will effect certain capital allocation transactions whereby our debt and equity capital upon closing of the separation will be as set forth in this information statement, and will otherwise take all actions necessary to implement our separation from Vishay Intertechnology as described in this information statement. We will agree to accept the assets and equity interests transferred to us. Except as specified in the master separation agreement, we will assume and perform all of the liabilities (including contingent liabilities) and obligations arising under or relating to the operation of the precision measurement and foil resistor businesses or the assets and equity interests that are transferred to us as part of the separation, whether incurred before or after the separation.
 
If either we or Vishay Intertechnology receives any asset that according to the master separation agreement or any ancillary agreement was allocated to the other party, the parties will cooperate to cause the asset to be transferred to the party that is entitled to it. If by mistake or omission any assets are transferred or retained by a party, or if by mistake or omission any liabilities were assumed by us or we failed to assume any liabilities, the parties will cooperate in good faith to transfer or retransfer the misallocated assets or to effect the assumption or reassumption of the misallocated liabilities to the appropriate party. The parties will reimburse each other or make another financial adjustment to remedy any such mistakes or omissions.
 
If any asset intended to be transferred to us under the master separation agreement cannot be transferred for any reason prior to the separation, for example because of any required consent or governmental approval, the party retaining the asset will hold it for the benefit of the other party insofar as possible, and the parties will take action insofar as reasonably possible so that the benefit and burdens relating to the asset will inure to the appropriate party, until such time as the asset can be transferred.
 
- 133 -
 


Each party, with the other’s reasonable best cooperation, will use reasonable efforts to obtain novation of, or assign all rights and obligations under, all contracts and other obligations or liabilities that such party has agreed to assume under the master separation agreement, so that the party that has agreed to assume such obligations and liabilities is solely responsible for them.  If there is any contract that is shared by Vishay Intertechnology and us, each party, with the reasonable best cooperation of the other, will take action to replace the contract with two separate contracts.  However, neither we nor Vishay Intertechnology will be under any obligation to pay any consideration or assume additional liabilities for these purposes.

The parties will agree to execute all necessary documentation to evidence the transfer of assets and the assumption of liabilities in accordance with the separation.

The master separation agreement also provides that we and Vishay Intertechnology will terminate, as of the closing of the separation, all contracts between us, including all accounts payable and receivable, except as specified in the agreement.

Upon our reasonable request, Vishay Intertechnology will use its reasonable best efforts to obtain from third parties the release of any security interest granted by Vishay Intertechnology on any of our assets. Borrowings under the Vishay Intertechnology credit facility have historically been secured by certain of our assets in the United States, and pledges of stock of certain of our subsidiaries.  Effective June 11, 2010, Vishay Intertechnology entered into an amendment to its credit facility which releases this collateral. We are not aware of any other security interest granted by Vishay Intertechnology on any of our assets.

Neither we nor Vishay Intertechnology will make any representation or warranty as to the assets or liabilities transferred or assumed, the value or freedom from any lien or other security interest of any assets transferred, the absence of any defenses relating to any claim of either party or the legal sufficiency of any conveyance documents or as to any consents or governmental approvals which may be required in connection with the transfers. Except as expressly set forth in the master separation agreement or in any ancillary agreement, all assets will be transferred on an “as is,” “where is” basis. The absence of representations and warranties and the “as is, where is” nature of the spin-off is customary for transactions of this nature, in which we are acquiring all of our assets, subject to specified liabilities being assumed, without paying a fair market value purchase price.  These characteristics of the spin-off may be considered to be unfavorable to us in comparison to the types of contractual protections we might be expected to receive from a seller if we were instead purchasing all of our assets from Vishay Intertechnology in an arms-length negotiated transaction.

Shortly following the distribution date, we will deliver to Vishay Intertechnology a statement setting forth our calculation of our net cash.  We will provide Vishay Intertechnology with access to our records and employees to permit Vishay Intertechnology to evaluate such calculation.  Disagreements as to our calculation of net cash will be referred to KPMG LLP for final and binding resolution.  Depending on whether our net cash is less than or exceeds specified thresholds set forth in the master separation agreement, an adjustment will be made following the distribution date pursuant to which one party will make a payment to the other in the amount of the difference.

The Distribution

We and Vishay Intertechnology will agree to use reasonable best efforts to consummate the distribution.  Among other things, the master separation agreement will require the parties to cooperate in respect of the separation and capital allocation transactions described above; cause the Form 10 registration statement of which this information statement forms a part to become and continue to be effective; distribute this information statement to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders; take any necessary action under state securities laws; list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange; effect appropriate accounting allocations; and take various actions relating to our corporate governance following the separation.  The obligations of the parties to effect the separation and distribution are subject to various conditions set forth in the master separation agreement and summarized elsewhere in this information statement.

The master separation agreement provides that Vishay Intertechnology will have sole discretion whether to proceed with the distribution, whether to modify any of its terms, including the terms described in this information statement, and to determine the timing and conditions of the distribution.
 
- 134 -
 


In accordance with the terms of the master separation agreement, we will appoint a registrar and transfer agent for the purpose of recording the ownership of our common stock and Class B common stock.  On or prior to the distribution date, we will issue to Vishay Intertechnology, and Vishay Intertechnology will electronically deliver to the distribution agent, a sufficient number of shares of our common stock and Class B common stock for distribution to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders on the distribution date.  On the distribution date, the record holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Class B common stock as of the record date will be entitled to receive shares of our common stock and Class B common stock, respectively, in accordance with the respective distribution ratios.  Promptly following the distribution date, the registrar and transfer agent will send to each of our stockholders of record an account statement showing the number of shares that they hold as of the distribution date.  Fractional shares will not be issued, and instead, holders will receive cash, as described elsewhere in this information statement.

Additional Covenants

We and Vishay Intertechnology each will agree to provide each other after the separation with corporate books and records of the other in its possession.  We and Vishay Intertechnology will also provide further assurance of execution and delivery of other documentation as necessary or desirable to effect the purposes of the master separation agreement.

We and Vishay Intertechnology will provide each other with information reasonably needed to comply with reporting, disclosure or filing requirements of governmental authorities; for use in judicial, regulatory, administrative and other proceedings or to satisfy audit, accounting, claims, regulatory litigation or similar requirements (other than claims or allegations that one party has against the other); to comply with obligations under the master separation agreement and ancillary agreements; for the preparation of required financial statements or completing an audit; for use in compensation, benefit or welfare plan administration or other bona fide business purposes; or to conduct ongoing business.  The parties will agree to make their respective personnel available during normal business hours to discuss information that is exchanged.  Each party will use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with respect to the other’s financial reporting and audit obligations. Further, each party also will agree to use reasonable best efforts to retain information related to the precision measurement and foil resistor businesses in its possession or control in accordance with its retention policies as in effect immediately prior to the distribution date and other such policies.

Except in the case of adversarial actions by the parties against each other, each party will agree to use its reasonable best efforts to make available to the other party its current, former and future directors, officers, employees and other personnel or agents who may be used as witnesses and books, records and other documents which may reasonably be required in connection with legal actions.

Subject to customary exceptions, the parties will agree to hold in strict confidence and not to disclose without the other party’s written consent, the confidential information of the other party.  Each party will have sole authority to determine whether to assert or waive attorney-client, work product or other privileges with respect to its own information.

Cooperation with Respect to Know-how

We and Vishay Intertechnology will agree that if one party reasonably believes that the other may have an expectation of ownership in know-how or other technical information that has come to the attention of the personnel of the first party and that the first party proposes to utilize in its business, the first party will be required to bring this to the attention of the other.  We and Vishay Intertechnology will agree to each designate at least one individual at a level equal to or above divisional P&L leader to discuss our respective rights to such know-how or information and to discuss requests from one party to the other for a license to utilize such information.  Such license requests must be considered in good faith by the other party; however, nothing will require either party to enter into such a license.
 
- 135 -
 


Exchangeable Notes and Warrants

We will further agree to issue notes exchangeable for shares of our common stock to such persons, in such amounts, upon such terms and at such time as required by the put and call agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and the holders of the notes due December 13, 2102, to issue warrants to acquire our common stock to such persons, in such amounts, upon such terms and at such time as required by the warrant agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company; and to register the shares of VPG common stock issuable upon exchange of the exchangeable notes or exercise of the warrants on a resale registration statement on such terms and within such time periods as required by a securities investment and registration rights agreement to which Vishay Intertechnology is subject.

Release of Claims and Indemnification

We and Vishay Intertechnology each will agree to release each other and each other’s respective current and former directors, officers, managers, agents, security holders, advisors, accountants, attorneys and other representatives from all liabilities existing or arising from any acts or events occurring or failing to occur on or before the distribution date. These releases will be subject to certain exceptions, including claims arising under the master separation agreement and the ancillary agreements; any specified liabilities; any liability assumed by a party pursuant to the master separation agreement; liability for goods and services in the ordinary course of business; and liability for claims of third parties for which indemnification or contribution is available under the master separation agreement.

Each of Vishay Intertechnology and we will agree to indemnify the other party and the other party’s respective current and former directors, officers, and employees against liabilities arising out of or resulting from the failure of the indemnifying party to perform or discharge liabilities for which it is responsible under the master separation agreement; the business of such party; any liability contemplated to be assumed or retained by such party; any environmental liabilities for which such party is liable under the master separation agreement; any breach or failure to perform by such party of its obligations under the master separation agreement or ancillary agreements; or any material misstatement or omission of such party in this information statement or the Form 10 registration statement of which it forms a part.  The amount of each party’s indemnification obligations will be subject to reduction by any insurance proceeds received by the party being indemnified.

The master separation agreement will also specify procedures with respect to claims subject to indemnification and related matters.  If indemnification is for any reason unavailable or insufficient to hold harmless the indemnified party, then the indemnifying party will contribute to the amount payable by the indemnified party in such proportion to place the indemnified party in the same position as if indemnification were available or, if that is not available or sufficient, in such proportion as reflects the parties’ relative benefits and fault.

Contingent Gains and Liabilities

A contingent gain means a claim or right that has accrued as of the distribution date whose existence or scope was not acknowledged, fixed or determined as of the distribution date in any material respect.  A contingent liability is a liability accrued as of the distribution date whose existence or scope was not acknowledged, fixed or determined as of the distribution date in any material respect.  The master separation agreement will provide that each party will have the exclusive right to any contingent gain, and will indemnify the other party for any contingent liability, that relates exclusively to such party’s business.  The parties will share all other contingent gains, and will be responsible for all other contingent liabilities, in such manner and in such percentages as are set forth in the master separation agreement.
 
- 136 -
 


Insurance and Director and Officer Indemnification

Vishay Intertechnology will agree to use reasonable best efforts to cause our interests and rights as insureds or beneficiaries under any occurrence-based insurance policies of Vishay Intertechnology in respect of periods prior to the separation, or under any claims-made policies to the extent a claim has been submitted prior to the separation, to survive the separation.  However, except as specifically provided, Vishay Intertechnology will not be required to maintain any tail or extended coverage for our benefit with respect to insurance policies in effect prior to the separation.  Vishay Intertechnology will further agree to administer insurance policies on our behalf, but this will not relieve us of the obligation to file claims or limit our authority to settle any claim within the limits of the relevant insurance policy.  If any insurer does not acknowledge insurance coverage with respect to any liabilities that we have assumed, at our expense and direction Vishay Intertechnology will pursue and recover insurance proceeds under the relevant policy on our behalf.  We and Vishay Intertechnology will agree to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate with respect to the insurance matters contemplated by the master separation agreement.  We will agree that Vishay Intertechnology will have no liability to us as a result of the insurance practices and policies of Vishay Intertechnology at any time prior to the separation.

Vishay Intertechnology will also use its reasonable best efforts to provide insurance (excluding insurance for any occurrences after the distribution) to those individuals who will be our officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents at the time of the separation and who immediately prior to the separation were insured persons under the current directors and officers liability insurance policy of Vishay Intertechnology, with material terms and conditions no less favorable than those given to the officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents of Vishay Intertechnology at such time, except that the insurance will exclude coverage for wrongful acts, errors or omissions occurring after the distribution date.

For a period of six years from the time of the separation, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Vishay Intertechnology and its amended and restated bylaws, to the extent they provide for indemnification of officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents immediately prior to the separation, will not be amended in a manner that would adversely affect the rights of persons who at the time of the separation were our officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents, except as required by law.

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the master separation agreement, as of the distribution date, Vishay Intertechnology will not be obligated to maintain insurance coverage with respect to our business, affairs, operations, assets or liabilities, and we will indemnify and hold Vishay Intertechnology harmless from any liabilities arising by reason of our failure to maintain such insurance.

Dispute Resolution

The dispute resolution procedures set forth in the master separation agreement will apply to all disputes, controversies and claims arising out of the master separation agreement, the ancillary agreements, the transactions that any of these agreements contemplate and the parties’ commercial or economic relationship relating to the master separation agreement or any ancillary agreement.

Either party may commence the dispute resolution process by notice to the other party.  The dispute notice, and the required written response of the other party, will set forth the position of the respective parties and a summary of their arguments.  The parties will then attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute by negotiation between executives of each party who have authority to settle the dispute.

If the dispute has not been resolved within 60 days or if the parties fail to meet within 30 days after delivery of the dispute notice, the parties will make a good faith attempt to settle the dispute by mediation in accordance with the procedures set forth in the master separation agreement.  If for any reason the dispute is not resolved through mediation within 180 days of delivery of the dispute notice, then the dispute will be submitted to binding arbitration under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 
- 137 -
 


The parties are not required to negotiate or mediate a dispute before seeking relief from an arbitrator or from a court regarding a breach of any obligation of confidentiality or any claim where interim relief is sought to prevent serious and irreparable injury.  However, the parties are required to make a good faith effort to negotiate and mediate the dispute while the arbitration or court proceeding is pending.

Termination

The master separation agreement and any of the ancillary agreements may be terminated or the terms of the separation and distribution may be amended, modified or abandoned, in each case, at any time prior to the effective time by and in the sole and absolute discretion of Vishay Intertechnology, without our approval. In the event of such termination, neither party will have any liability of any kind to the other party.
 
Tax Matters Agreement
 
In connection with the master separation agreement, we will enter into a tax matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology. This agreement will (1) govern the allocation of U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign tax liability between us and Vishay Intertechnology, (2) provide for certain restrictions and indemnities in connection with the tax treatment of the distribution, and (3) address certain other tax-related matters.
 
Allocation of Tax Liability
 
Until the distribution occurs, we will be included in Vishay Intertechnology’s consolidated federal income tax returns and will be included with Vishay Intertechnology and/or certain Vishay Intertechnology subsidiaries in applicable combined or unitary state and local income tax returns.
  • Under the tax matters agreement, Vishay Intertechnology generally will be liable for all U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign income taxes attributable to us with respect to taxable periods ending on or before the distribution date except to the extent that we have a liability for such taxes on our books at the time of the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology also will be liable for income taxes attributable to us with respect to taxable periods beginning before the distribution date and ending after the distribution date, but only to the extent those taxes are allocable (using a closing of the books method) to the portion of the taxable period ending on the distribution date.
     
  • With respect to non-income taxes that are attributable to a tax period prior to the spin-off, except the extent we have a liability on our books for such taxes at the time of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will be responsible for one half of taxes.
     
  • Vishay Intertechnology will prepare and file the U.S. consolidated federal income tax returns for all periods, including the taxable period in which we are included, and any Vishay Intertechnology combined, unitary, or consolidated state income tax returns for all periods, including those in which we are included.  At our request, Vishay Intertechnology will prepare certain non-U.S. income tax returns for years that ended prior to 2010 that have not yet been filed.  We will generally prepare and file all other tax returns attributable to us.  Generally, Vishay Intertechnology will principally control any income tax audits for which they may need to indemnify us, and we will principally control any other tax audit for taxes attributable to us.
     
  • Under the tax matters agreement, we have agreed to reimburse Vishay Intertechnology if it incurs a cash tax in one of the transactions leading up to the spin-off.  Our obligation is limited by the tax benefit we receive as a result of the transaction.
- 138 -
 

 
Restrictions and Indemnities in Connection with the Tax Treatment of the Distribution
 
The tax matters agreement also will provide that we are liable for taxes incurred by Vishay Intertechnology that arise as a result of our taking or failing to take certain actions that result in the distribution failing to meet the requirements of a tax-free distribution under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. We therefore have agreed that, among other things, we will not take any actions that would result in any tax being imposed on the spin-off. Specifically:
  • During the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not liquidate, merge or consolidate with any other person, specific subsidiaries that conduct an active trade or business relied upon in connection with the request for a private letter ruling.
     
  • During the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not dispose of any of our assets, except in the ordinary course of business.
     
  • During the two-year period following the spin-off, we will continue (independently from Vishay Intertechnology, and with separate employees, officers, and directors from Vishay Intertechnology) the active conduct of the historic businesses relied upon in connection with the request for a private letter ruling that were conducted by us throughout the five-year period prior to the spin-off.
     
  • We will not take, nor will we permit any of our subsidiaries to take, any action inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the IRS in connection with the request for a private letter ruling with respect to the spin-off or to tax counsel pursuant to Section 4.3 of the master separation agreement.
     
  • During the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not, and will not permit any of our subsidiaries, to purchase our capital stock.
     
  • During the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not issue our capital stock to any person, other than pursuant to the exercise of employee, director, or consultant stock options, stock awards, stock purchase rights or other employment related arrangement under any stock incentive plan in existence immediately after the spin-off, provided in each case that such stock issuance meets the requirements for the safe harbor contained in Treasury Regulations Section 1.355-7(d)(8).
     
  • We will not enter into any transaction or, to the extent we have the right to prohibit any such transaction, permit such transaction to occur, or enter into negotiations to enter into any transaction that may cause the spin-off to be treated as part of a plan or series of related transactions pursuant to which one or more persons acquire directly or indirectly our capital stock representing a “50-percent or greater interest” within the meaning of Section 355(d)(4) of the Code.
     
  • We will not take any other action that would reasonably be expected to prevent the spin-off from qualifying as a transaction described in Section 355(a) of the Code.
In addition, we have agreed not to engage in certain of the actions described above, whether before or after the two-year period following the spin-off, if it is pursuant to an arrangement negotiated (in whole or in part) prior to the first anniversary of the spin-off.
 
We may, however, take certain actions prohibited by the tax matters agreement if we provide Vishay Intertechnology with a reasonably acceptable opinion of tax counsel or Vishay Intertechnology receives a supplemental private letter ruling from the IRS, to the effect that these actions will not affect the tax-free nature of the spin-off.
 
- 139 -
 


Trademark License Agreement

At or prior to the separation, we and Vishay Intertechnology will enter a trademark license agreement pursuant to which Vishay Intertechnology will grant us the license to use certain trademarks, service marks, logos, trade names, entity names and domain names which include the term “Vishay.”

License of Rights and Limitations

Vishay Intertechnology will grant to us the limited, exclusive, royalty-free right and license to use certain marks and names incorporating the term “VISHAY” in connection with the design, development, manufacture, marketing, provision and performance of foil resistor strain gages, transducers (load cells) utilizing foil resistor strain gages, electronic instruments that measure and control output of transducers utilizing foil resistor strain gages, instruments to measure strain, systems for process and force measurement control and on-board weighing, foil resistors, current sensors, any additional products which do not compete with any products within the product range of Vishay Intertechnology or any of its subsidiaries as constituted immediately following the separation, and certain services provided in connection with these products. Any use of these marks on products other than those specified in the trademark license agreement will require advance written approval by Vishay Intertechnology. Additionally, Vishay Intertechnology will grant us a limited, exclusive, royalty-free right and license to display VISHAY alone (i.e., without any other terms) as a marking on certain foil resistor products qualified to the Mil spec system, meaning built on a Mil Qualified product line or SCD (Customer Source Control Drawing) and on Mil drawings and SCDs relating thereto. The license will be for our use in perpetuity throughout the world, unless the license is terminated in accordance with the terms of the trademark license agreement. Unless and until the trademark license is terminated, and for 24 months thereafter, we will also be allowed to use the name “Vishay Precision Group, Inc.” as our corporate name. The license also provides for certain transition period activities including our right to display VISHAY alone (i.e., without any other term) as a marking on foil resistor products, and in drawings related thereto, until December 31, 2012, and to thereafter provide such product and drawings to existing customers until December 31, 2014. We will also be permitted, for a period of twelve months following the separation, to distribute certain literature and use office signage displaying the term VISHAY in the manner it was displayed in that literature or office signage prior to the separation.

We will agree that Vishay Intertechnology is making no representation or warranty to us regarding its right, title and interest in the licensed marks, the absence of any action relating to the licensed marks or the absence of any claim that use of the licensed marks violates the rights of any person.
 
We will be permitted to use any document number or part number on materials posted to the internet on or in connection with certain products and services so long as those document numbers or part numbers do not contain the prefix or suffix VSH.

Use Standards

All products and services that we manufacture, market, provide or perform under the licensed marks must be of high quality, free of material defects and performed with integrity and in a professional manner and must be in compliance with applicable law.  We refer to these requirements as the applicable standards.

We will maintain appropriate process and quality controls with respect to the products and services using the licensed marks to assure compliance with the applicable standards.  Vishay Intertechnology will have the right from time to time at reasonable intervals to receive from us at Vishay Intertechnology’s sole expense, representative samples of our products and copies of all marketing materials using the licensed marks.  We will work together with Vishay Intertechnology in order to remedy any failure to conform to the terms of the trademark license agreement or to comply with the applicable standards.  Any dispute will be resolved in the manner provided in the master separation agreement.
 
- 140 -
 


Additional Marks; Registration; Enforcement

If we propose to use any additional marks containing the name “VISHAY,” we will notify Vishay Intertechnology in advance in writing.  If Vishay Intertechnology does not object in writing within thirty business days, it will be deemed to have approved the use of such mark. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no consent will be required in order for us to use any additional marks containing the name “VISHAY PRECISION” as long as the mark does not contain the name “INTERTECHNOLOGY.”

At our reasonable request and expense, Vishay Intertechnology will procure and maintain the registration of any of the licensed marks.  We will not register any of the licensed marks or any similar marks, unless authorized by Vishay Intertechnology in writing.

Vishay Intertechnology will license to us the use of certain internet domain names containing the name “VISHAY.”  If we propose to register an additional domain name containing the name “VISHAY,” we will notify Vishay Intertechnology in writing, subject to an exception for domain names including the name “VISHAY PRECISION” and not including the name “INTERTECHNOLOGY.” If Vishay Intertechnology does not object in writing within thirty business days, it will be deemed to have approved the additional domain name.

We and Vishay Intertechnology will cooperate so that the licensed marks will appear distinctive from marks utilized by Vishay Intertechnology.

We agree that unless otherwise specified in the trademark license agreement, we will not use the word “Vishay” unless it is immediately followed by the word “Precision.”

Any dispute concerning our request to use additional marks, additional domain names or the appearances of our or Vishay Intertechnology’s marks will be resolved in the manner provided in the master separation agreement.

We will agree to cooperate with Vishay Intertechnology in the protection of Vishay Intertechnology’s rights in the licensed marks, as Vishay Intertechnology reasonably requests.  Each party shall promptly advise the other party in writing of any actual or potential infringement, or any other unauthorized use of or violation of any of the licensed marks, of which it becomes aware. Vishay Intertechnology may take such action as it deems necessary or advisable to stop any infringement.  We may request in writing that Vishay Intertechnology institute an action to stop an infringement.  If Vishay Intertechnology does not institute an action within 30 days, we will be entitled to do so.  Any monetary recovery or sums obtained in settlement of any action to stop an infringement will be allocated between the parties in a fair and equitable manner.

Termination
 
Vishay Intertechnology may terminate the trademark license agreement if:
  • we willfully, intentionally and in bad faith breach any material provision of the agreement or willfully, intentionally and in bad faith fail to cure any other breach, with Vishay Intertechnology having given us 60 days notice to cure any breach that can be cured; or
  • we, without the consent of Vishay Intertechnology,  willfully and intentionally and in bad faith purport to assign our rights and obligations under the trademark license agreement in violation of the trademark license agreement; or
  • we abandon the use of the licensed marks; or
  • we file a petition under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or a petition under Chapter 7 is involuntarily filed against us and is not dismissed within 90 days of our receipt of notice of the filing.
If we in good faith dispute that Vishay Intertechnology has a valid basis for termination, the dispute will be resolved in the manner provided in the master separation agreement and the trademark license agreement will remain in effect until resolution of such dispute.

Any termination will not be effective less than 90 days after delivery to us of a notice of termination.  If we in good faith dispute that Vishay Intertechnology has a valid basis for termination, the dispute will be resolved in the manner provided in the master separation agreement.  Termination of the trademark license agreement will not relieve us of liability for breach.
 
- 141 -
 


Notwithstanding a termination, we will be entitled to continue to use the licensed marks and licensed domain names for a period of up to one year from the date of termination for the purpose of disposing of our then-existing inventory of products and/or promotional materials bearing the licensed marks, and for transitioning us to the use of other marks.
 
Assignment and Sublicense
 
The license will be assignable or sublicenseable to any majority owned subsidiary, provided that we remain responsible for the compliance by any such majority owned subsidiary with the terms of the trademark license agreement. We define a “majority owned subsidiary” as a subsidiary of ours (i) of which over 50% of the voting securities and over 50% of the outstanding equity interests, whether voting or non-voting, are owned by either us, one or more of such subsidiaries, or us and one or more of such subsidiaries, and (ii) which is engaged in the design, development, manufacture, marketing, provision and performance of products and services as part of a business under our management and control. If we transfer our business in the design, development, manufacture, marketing, provision and performance of products and services substantially as an entirety to a single purchaser or other single transferee, and thereafter we cease to be engaged in such business, the transferee will succeed to our rights and obligations. The following actions are not considered an assignment under the trademark license agreement: (1) assignment or transfer of our stock, including by way of a merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization in which our outstanding shares are exchanged for securities, or (2) any transaction effected primarily for the purpose of (A) changing our state of incorporation or (B) reorganizing ourselves into a holding company structure such that, as a result of any such transaction, we become a wholly-owned subsidiary of a holding company owned by the holders of our securities immediately prior to such transaction.
 
Other Provisions
 
The trademark license agreement will also contain customary provisions with respect to confidentiality and indemnification.
 
Employee Matters Agreement
 
At or before the separation, we will enter into an employee matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology that provides for the transition of employee benefits arrangements and allocates responsibility for certain employee benefit matters on and after the spin-off, including the treatment of existing welfare benefit plans, savings plans, equity-based plans and deferred compensation plans and our establishment of new plans. Some of the transactions to be addressed in the employee matters agreement have been effected as of January 1, 2010, to avoid a mid-year transition between plans.
 
References in this section to Vishay Intertechnology and us include the parties’ respective subsidiaries as they will exist following the separation.
 
General Principles
 
The employee matters agreement will provide that, prior to the distribution date, to the extent not previously transferred, all employees of Vishay Intertechnology that are expected to be employed primarily in our business will be transferred to us.
 
Except as provided in the employee matters agreement, Vishay Intertechnology will retain as of the distribution date all liabilities under the Vishay Intertechnology benefit plans. Following the distribution date, we will reimburse Vishay Intertechnology for the cost of any liabilities satisfied or assumed by Vishay Intertechnology that are our responsibility, and Vishay Intertechnology will reimburse us for the cost of any liabilities that we satisfy or assume and that are the responsibility of Vishay Intertechnology.
 
Our employees who participate in an existing benefit plan of ours may either continue participation in that plan after the separation or transfer participation to a comparable plan that we will establish as contemplated by the employee matters agreement.
 
- 142 -
 


Except as otherwise agreed in writing between the parties, each employee of Vishay Intertechnology who becomes our employee will cease participation in the benefit plans of Vishay Intertechnology, effective as of a date on or after such employee’s transfer to us but in no event later than the distribution date. We will provide employees of Vishay Intertechnology who become our employees with credit for all purposes, including eligibility, vesting, determination of benefit levels and benefit accruals, under our benefit programs, policies and plans to the same extent as was recognized by Vishay Intertechnology. We will also credit these employees with the amount of accrued but unused vacation time and other time-off benefits.
 
Retirement Plans
 
Vishay Intertechnology maintains various retirement plans, including a 401(k) plan (referred to as the Vishay Employee Savings Plus Plan) and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for senior employees (referred to as the Vishay Key Employee Wealth Accumulation Plan or KEWAP). We have established or will establish similar plans for the benefit of our employees. Vishay Intertechnology has caused or will cause the accounts and underlying assets and liabilities under the Vishay Intertechnology plans for our employees who were participating in these plans to be transferred to our corresponding plans or, in the case of KEWAP assets, from a rabbi trust established by Vishay Intertechnology to one that we have established or will establish.
 
Vishay Intertechnology also maintains a defined benefit pension plan and a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan. Both of these plans are frozen, which means that participants retain their benefits, but do not accrue new benefits, and no new participants are admitted to the plan. We are not establishing a defined benefit plan, and our employees who participate in the Vishay Intertechnology plan will be treated the same as any other participant who terminates employment. We have established or will establish a nonqualified defined benefit plan, which will be frozen, and the accounts of our employees who participated in the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan will be transferred to our plan similar to the transfer of accounts under the 401(k) and KEWAP plans.
 
Health and Welfare Plans
 
Effective as of or before the distribution date, we have established health and welfare plans for the benefit of our employees, which provide the same type of benefits as do the corresponding plans of Vishay Intertechnology. These include health, life, dental, vision, prescription drug, short-term disability, long-term disability, and educational assistance coverage benefits. Our plans have waived and will waive preexisting condition and other limitations and exclusions, other than those that were in effect under the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan; waive any waiting period limitation or evidence of insurability requirement to the extent satisfied under the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan; and honor any deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums and co-payments incurred under the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan.
 
We have also established effective as of January 1, 2010, health care and dependent care flexible spending account plans for the benefit of our employees. To the extent an employee is transferred to us after that date and before the distribution date, the employee’s accounts with the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plans will be transferred to our plans.
 
We will be responsible for any workers ’ compensation liability up to the amount accrued on our balance sheet on the date such worker became our employee, and for any such liabilities resulting from a compensable injury or occupational disease of our employees on or after such date.
 
- 143 -
 


Equity Awards Generally
 
Outstanding equity awards of Vishay Intertechnology in the form of stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and phantom stock will be adjusted as a consequence of the spin-off.
 
Stock options . Effective as of the separation, Vishay Intertechnology will amend each outstanding grant of stock options made pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Program, Vishay Intertechnology 2007 Stock Incentive Program and the Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan of General Semiconductor, Inc. to reduce the exercise price of each of the options and increase the number of shares issuable upon exercise of each of the options according to the following formulas:
 
E Vs = E V x P Vs / (P Vs + r x P Ps )
and
          N Vs = N V x E V / E Vs
 
where—
 
E V is the per share exercise price of the Vishay Intertechnology option prior to the spin-off
  N V
is the number of shares of common stock of Vishay Intertechnology issuable upon exercise of the option prior to the spin-off
E Vs is the per share exercise price of the Vishay Intertechnology option following the spin-off
P Vs   is the per share market value of the common stock of Vishay Intertechnology following the spin-off
N Vs
is the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology issuable upon exercise of the option following the spin-off
P Ps is the per share market value of the common stock of Vishay Precision Group following the spin-off
          r      is the distribution ratio for the spin-off.

Per share market value is a volume weighted-average of selling prices for the 10 trading days following the distribution date. The other terms of the Vishay Intertechnology stock options, including their remaining vesting schedule if any, will remain the same.
 
Phantom stock and restricted stock units. Effective as of the separation, Vishay Intertechnology will amend each outstanding grant of phantom stock awarded pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology Senior Executive Phantom Stock Plan and each outstanding grant of restricted stock units (RSUs) (both those subject to ordinary vesting and those restricted stock units subject to performance-based vesting, sometimes referred to as performance share units or PSUs) awarded pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Program, to increase the number of shares of phantom stock and the number of RSUs applicable to such grants, according to the following formula:
 
          N Vs = N V x [1 + r x P Ps / P Vs ]
 
where “N V ” and “N Vs ” are the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock underlying the restricted stock units or phantom shares before and following the distribution date, respectively; and the other symbols have the same values as those assigned above with respect to the formulas for treatment of stock options.
 
Effective as of the separation, Vishay Intertechnology will also amend each outstanding grant of PSUs awarded pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Program to reduce by 10% the numeric value of each applicable performance goal that applies to periods following the separation, to reflect the impact of the spin-off on the achievability of the Vishay Intertechnology performance goals. This provision only applies to employees who will remain with Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off.  See Equity Awards Held by Employees of Vishay Precision Group for a discussion of the treatment of Vishay Intertechnology equity awards held by employees of Vishay Precision Group.
 
The other terms of the Vishay Intertechnology phantom stock and RSUs, including the remaining vesting schedule of the RSUs, will remain the same.
 
- 144 -
 


Equity Awards Held by Employees of Vishay Precision Group
 
As described below, we expect to replace or offer to replace outstanding equity awards of Vishay Intertechnology held by our employees with similar awards of our own following the separation. These awards will be issued pursuant to the Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program, whose terms will be substantially similar to 2007 Vishay Intertechnology Stock Incentive Program. We will adopt the 2010 Program prior to the distribution date, and Vishay Intertechnology will cause the shares of our common stock issuable under the program to be registered on Form S-8. For a description of the terms of the 2010 Program, see “Executive Compensation—Equity Awards—Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program.”
 
Stock options . All unvested awards of stock options held by employees of Vishay Precision Group will expire by their terms upon consummation of the spin-off. Vested but unexercised stock options held by employees of Vishay Precision Group will generally expire 60 days after consummation of the spin-off. All or the substantial majority of these options are expected to have an exercise price, as adjusted for the spin-off, that will be above the market price for Vishay Intertechnology common stock immediately following the distribution date.
 
Effective as of the separation, we will issue to our employees who hold unvested stock options of Vishay Intertechnology that will be forfeited as a result of the spin-off stock options under the 2010 Program in lieu of their Vishay Intertechnology stock options. We will also offer our employees who hold vested stock options of Vishay Intertechnology the opportunity to replace those options with options to acquire our common stock. In either case, the exercise price of each of the options that we will issue under the 2010 Program and the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of each of the options will be determined according to the following formulas:
 
E Ps = E V x P Ps / (P Vs + (r x P Ps ))
  and
          N Ps = N V x E V / E Ps

where—
 
  E Ps   is the per share exercise price of the option to purchase our common stock.
          N Ps      is the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the option,

and the other symbols have the same values as those assigned above with respect to the formulas for treatment of stock options of Vishay Intertechnology. The other terms of the options to acquire our common stock will be the same as the options to acquire Vishay Intertechnology that they are intended to replace. In the case of our stock options issued in lieu of forfeited Vishay Intertechnology stock options, the vesting schedule for the options that we issue will be the same as the remaining vesting schedule of the forfeited Vishay Intertechnology options. If the exercise price of any options to acquire our common stock is less than the market value of our common stock on the date we issue the options, we may issue the options according to a different formula in order to comply with certain regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
Restricted stock units and phantom stock units . The only one of our employees who holds RSUs and phantom stock of Vishay Intertechnology is Ziv Shoshani, who is expected to serve as our Chief Executive Officer. Phantom stock units are fully vested on issuance. The phantom stock units of Mr. Shoshani will be converted into shares of common stock of Vishay Intertechnology upon Mr. Shoshani’s termination of his executive officer position with Vishay Intertechnology on the distribution date, and these shares will be treated in the spin-off the same as all other shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock.
 
- 145 -
 


The unvested Vishay Intertechnology RSUs held by Mr. Shoshani will expire upon consummation of the spin-off. In lieu of the expiring Vishay Intertechnology RSUs, we will issue to Mr. Shoshani as of the distribution date our RSUs according to the following formula:
 
          N Ps = N V x (r + P Vs /P Ps )
 
where “N V ” is the number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock underlying the Vishay Intertechnology RSUs before the distribution date and “N Ps ” is the number of shares of our common stock underlying our RSUs following the distribution date; and the other symbols have the same values as those assigned above with respect to the formulas for treatment of stock options. The other terms of our RSUs will be the same as the Vishay Intertechnology RSUs that they are intended to replace.
 
Non-U.S. Employees and Benefits
 
Approximately 88% of our employees are located outside of the United States. We intend to comply with local law and custom in each jurisdiction outside the United States in which we operate with respect to any consequences of the spin-off regarding employee rights and benefits. While many of our employees will be employed by the same legal entity irrespective of the separation, in some cases employees are being transferred from a Vishay Intertechnology entity to one of our entities. This transfer may affect the rights and benefits of the transferred employees. For example, in Israel we will be required to obtain the consent of transferred employees and assume certain employment related liabilities in order that the transfer will not be deemed a termination of employment. Any transfers in other jurisdictions may have similar requirements. We intend to observe all such requirements, as applicable.
 
Additional Matters
 
Vishay Intertechnology will acknowledge that, except as provided in the employee matters agreement, it will remain responsible for any compensatory arrangements previously provided by Vishay Intertechnology to our employees. Vishay Intertechnology and we will agree to assign to us, and cause our employees to consent to the assignment of, any agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and any of our employees, which are not replaced with agreements between us and the employees.
 
Vishay Intertechnology and we will acknowledge that, with certain exceptions, the separation and transfer of employment from Vishay Intertechnology to us will not constitute a termination of employment for purposes of any policy, plan, program or agreement of Vishay Intertechnology or a change of control for purposes of any benefit plan of Vishay Intertechnology or us.
 
The employee matters agreement will also address certain other matters, such as responsibility for COBRA coverage, compensation-related tax deductions and customary indemnification. The dispute resolution provisions of the master separation agreement will apply to disputes arising under the employee matters agreement.
 
- 146 -
 


Transition Services Agreement
 
On the distribution date, we and Vishay Intertechnology will enter into a transition services agreement pursuant to which Vishay Intertechnology, in its capacity as the provider, will provide us, in our capacity as the recipient, with certain information technology and other services for a limited time to help ensure an orderly transition following the separation. We do not expect total payments under the transition services agreement to exceed $300,000 in the first twelve months or $500,000 in the aggregate. The substantial majority of such expense will be incurred under the transition services agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, in this section, references to the provider refer to the provider of services under each agreement and references to the recipient refer to the recipient of services under each agreement.
 
Services
 
Pursuant to the transition services agreement, Vishay Intertechnology, through its subsidiaries, will provide to us certain information technology support services for our foil resistor business at costs set forth in the transition services agreement.
 
The cost of the services to be provided may not necessarily be reflective of prices that could have been obtained for similar services from an independent third-party.
 
The provider will agree to perform its services in a workmanlike and professional manner, with the same degree of care as it exercises in performing its own functions of a like nature, utilizing individuals of suitable experience, training and skill, and in a timely manner in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
 
Service levels, if any, may be decreased from the initial service levels upon the recipient’s delivery to the provider of advance written notice of such decrease. Any increase in the scope of services, including the addition of any new services, will be negotiated in good faith by the parties. The parties will acknowledge that certain services may be provided by third parties designated by the provider.
 
The transition services agreement will provide that the provider will maintain books and records in reasonable and customary detail pertaining to the provision of services. The recipient will have the right to inspect and audit such books and records. The provider will agree to provide the recipient with customary reports concerning the performance of the services and as the recipient reasonably requests from time to time.
 
- 147 -
 


Cooperation and Consents
 
Each party will agree to reasonably cooperate with the other in carrying out the provisions of the agreement, including, but not limited to, exchanging information, providing electronic systems used in connection with the services, making adjustments and obtaining all consents, licenses, sublicenses or approvals necessary to permit each party to perform its obligations under the agreement. In contemplation of termination of any services, the provider will agree to cooperate with the recipient at the recipient’s expense in transitioning such services.
 
Confidentiality and Intellectual Property
 
Subject to customary exceptions, for a period of five years from receipt of confidential information of the other party, each party will agree to exercise reasonable precautions to prevent disclosure of confidential information to others; use such information only as provided in the agreement; and disclose such information only to its employees with a need to know such information.
 
Each party’s data, software or other property or assets owned by such party will remain the sole and exclusive property and responsibility of such party.
 
Remedies
 
The recipient’s sole remedy under the agreement will be either, at the election of the recipient, to require the provider to re-perform the service without payment by recipient; to provide recipient with a credit in an equivalent amount towards future purchase; or to require the provider to pay the cost or replacing such services with a third-party provider. Neither party’s liability to the other for any loss arising out of or resulting from the agreement or the furnishing of services will, in any month, exceed three times the monthly price of the specific service which gives rise to the claim for such month.
 
Indemnification
 
Each party will indemnify the other from all liabilities to third parties relating to a breach of the agreement; gross negligence or willful misconduct; or infringement of third-party intellectual property in the performance of any service, in each case, by the indemnifying party, except to the extent that any such liabilities are caused by the indemnified party. The recipient will further agree to indemnify the provider for any sales, use or excise taxes, and for liabilities relating to the content of or defects in any of the recipient’s inventory, material or other property, or the recipient’s performance of services as agreed with the provider. The procedures with respect to claims subject to indemnification will be governed by the master separation agreement.
 
Term and Termination
 
The term of the agreement will end on the 18-month anniversary of the distribution date unless terminated earlier.
 
The provider will be permitted to terminate the agreement in the event an invoice remains unpaid for 60 days. Either party will be permitted to terminate the agreement if the other party materially breaches any of its obligations under the agreement and does not cure such breach within 30 days of receiving written notice from the non-defaulting party, or upon 30 days’ written notice in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or similar occurrence. The recipient will be permitted to terminate the agreement upon 60 days’ written notice, except that the recipient may not terminate the agreement earlier than 90 days after the distribution date.
 
- 148 -
 


Dispute Resolution
 
The parties will agree to use their respective reasonable best efforts to resolve expeditiously any disputes between them with respect to the matters covered by the agreement. In the event that the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, the dispute will be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in the master separation agreement.
 
Secondment Agreement
 
Vishay Intertechnology has agreed to second to us two of its employees, Dr. Felix Zandman and Reuven Katraro, in accordance with the terms of the secondment agreement. We refer to each of Dr. Zandman and Mr. Katraro as a secondee. Pursuant to the secondment agreement, Vishay Intertechnology is required to make each secondee available to us for the services specified in the secondment agreement for up to 5% of the secondee’s professional working time on a monthly basis. The initial term of the secondment agreement will expire on the first anniversary of its execution and will thereafter automatically renew for additional one year periods unless sooner terminated.
 
The secondees are required to perform the services requested by our CEO, who is required to consult with the CEO of Vishay Intertechnology with respect to scheduling of the provision of the services. The secondees will at all times remain employees of Vishay Intertechnology. In consideration for the secondees’ services to us, we will pay to Vishay Intertechnology an annual fee specified in the secondment agreement in monthly installments. We will be responsible for reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by Vishay Intertechnology or either secondee in connection with the services provided. Any invention, development, improvement, process, or design relating to our activities will be our absolute property, except that the same cannot incorporate the intellectual property of Vishay Intertechnology without its consent. We may terminate the secondment agreement at any time upon 30 days written notice. Either party is permitted to terminate the agreement upon breach; bankruptcy; or inability of a secondee to perform the required services. The secondment agreement will also contain customary provisions with respect to confidentiality and indemnification.
 
Supply Agreements
 
After the distribution, we and Vishay Intertechnology each will require certain products manufactured by the other for manufacture and sale of our respective products. Accordingly, we and Vishay Intertechnology or one or more of our respective subsidiaries, will enter into multiple supply agreements pursuant to which one party will be obligated to supply to the other certain products described in the supply agreements, up to a maximum aggregate quantity for each product, at pricing set forth in the supply agreements. The term of each supply agreement shall be perpetual unless sooner terminated. However, either party may terminate any of the supply agreements at any time upon written notice to the other party at least one year prior to the requested date of termination. The parties will negotiate in good faith as to the pricing for each product on an annual basis taking into account ascertainable market inputs.
 
The supplier will be required to notify the buyer of any change in a product or its manufacture and the buyer will be required to accept the change or notify the supplier that the change is unacceptable, in which case the product will be treated as a discontinued product. At any time the supplier may notify the buyer that the supplier is discontinuing the manufacture and sale of a product and the buyer will have the opportunity to place a written last time buy order at the purchase price in effect as of the discontinuation notice. The buyer will be obligated to provide forecasts as to quantity needed to the supplier in accordance with the supply agreements. The supplier will warrant that the products conform to the specifications set forth in the supply agreement, will be free from material defects and will be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing practice and applicable law. The buyer will be required to make any claims regarding any non-conforming product within 1 year of shipment and the supplier’s liability for such claims will be limited to refund or replacement. Nothing, however, will limit the obligations of the supplier in respect of third party claims arising from non-conforming products. The supply agreement will also provide for customary covenants and indemnification provisions. Any disputes between the parties will be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in the master separation agreement.
 
- 149 -
 


Patent License Agreement
 
In connection with the separation and distribution, we and Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc., a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, will enter into a patent license agreement pursuant to which Vishay Dale Electronics will grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license under a U.S. patent covering a surface mounted foil resistor to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale, export and import products until the expiration of the patent, subject to certain termination rights. The license will be sublicenseable by us to direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, so long as we remain responsible for compliance with the terms of the patent license agreement by our subsidiaries. Vishay Dale Electronics will make customary warranties and the patent license agreement will contain customary disclaimer and indemnification provisions. In addition, we will indemnify Vishay Dale Electronics in any action arising by reason of the manufacture, marketing, sale, or other activity with respect to the products we manufacture under the patent or which incorporate a portion of such a product. Any disputes between the parties will be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in the master separation agreement, except that all proceedings provided for in the master separation agreement must be conducted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 
Lease Agreements
 
We and Vishay Intertechnology, or our respective subsidiaries, will enter into lease agreements for space in Be’er Sheva, Israel; Malvern, Pennsylvania; Akita, Japan; and Holon, Israel. In each case, the lease will be at a market rate and on customary terms for a lease of its nature.
 
Be’er Sheva Lease
 
Vishay Intertechnology will lease to us approximately 14,000 square feet of space in Be’er Sheva, Israel for a term of 5 years, for purposes of manufacturing foil technology products. We will have the option to extend the term for 5 periods of 1 year each on the terms of the lease agreement. We will also be allowed to use certain common areas of the building. In addition to rent, we will pay our proportionate share of all taxes and insurance costs, including our use of the leased space and the common areas.
 
Other Leases
 
Vishay Intertechnology will lease to us or one of our affiliates 2 rooms in its facility located in Malvern, Pennsylvania for a term of 5 years, to provide a quality assurance laboratory and a demonstration kit laboratory for 2 of our personnel.
 
We will lease to Vishay Intertechnology approximately 2,000 square feet of space in Akita, Japan for a term of 5 years, for quality assurance operations. The term will be automatically renewed for successive five-year terms unless either party notifies the other in writing of termination at least 6 months prior to expiration of the term. In addition to rent, Vishay Intertechnology will be responsible for certain costs and expenses, including all consumption tax related to such costs and expenses. In addition, we will grant to the lessee a right of first refusal in the event that we desire to sell the building and the underlying land, which right will be exercisable during the term of the lease, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the lease agreement.
 
Finally, we will lease to Vishay Intertechnology approximately 13,000 square feet of space in Holon, Israel on a short-term basis. Vishay Intertechnology currently maintains its administrative offices in the building and we will be leasing this space to Vishay Intertechnology until their relocation.
 
- 150 -
 


Other Agreements
 
We and Vishay Intertechnology will also enter into certain other agreements. These include agreements relating to the manufacture of strain gages by a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology for certain European aerospace customers under which we will license certain technology to the Vishay Intertechnology subsidiary for a ten year period, and an agreement with Vishay Intertechnology pursuant to which a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology will serve as a manufacturer on our behalf with respect to the finishing of certain foil resistor chips supplied by one of our subsidiaries.
 
Interests in Vishay Intertechnology
 
Certain of our directors and executive officers own Vishay Intertechnology common stock and vested Vishay Intertechnology options and other equity instruments. Following the spin-off, we expect our directors and executive officers to beneficially own approximately 124,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock, based on their holdings as of June 18, 2010.
 
We expect to replace or offer to replace outstanding equity awards of Vishay Intertechnology held by our employees with similar awards of our own following the separation. See “Employee Matters Agreement – Equity Awards Held by Employees of Vishay Precision Group” above.
 
Other Related Party Transactions
 
Vishay Intertechnology maintains, and we expect to maintain, employment agreements with Ziv Shoshani, who is expected to be our President and Chief Executive Officer. See “Executive Compensation” above.
 
We historically have had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of our business. See Note 3 to our combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Dubi Zandman will be our Vice President responsible for Systems division operations. Mr. Dubi Zandman is a cousin of Dr. Felix Zandman. For 2009, Mr. Dubi Zandman received salary and benefits of $187,496.
 
Steven Klausner will be our Vice President – Treasurer. Mr. Klausner is the brother-in-law of Marc Zandman, who, following the spin-off will become the non-executive chairman of our board of directors, and the son-in-law of Dr. Felix Zandman. For 2009, Mr. Klausner received salary and benefits of $177,619.
 
We expect that our board of directors or its committees will adopt a written related party transaction policy, which will govern transactions between our company and our directors and executive officers and their families; stockholders owning in excess of 5% of any class of our securities; and certain affiliates of these persons.
 
- 151 -
 


DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
 
The following description is a summary of the material terms of our capital stock and reflects our charter and bylaws that will be in effect at the time of the spin-off. We will file our charter and bylaws as exhibits to our registration statement on Form 10.
 
Our capital structure will be substantially congruent with the capital structure of Vishay Intertechnology. The aggregate number of shares of capital stock which we have authority to issue is 29,000,000 shares: 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per share, and 3,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.10 per share.
 
Holders of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock will receive 1 share of our common stock or our Class B common stock, respectively, for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock or Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock, respectively, that they own as of June 25, 2010.
 
As of June 18, 2010, Vishay Intertechnology had 172,363,925 shares of common stock and 14,352,839 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.
 
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
 
After any required payment on shares of preferred stock, holders of common stock and Class B common stock will be entitled to receive, and share ratably on a per share basis in, all dividends and other distributions declared by our board of directors. In the event of a stock dividend or stock split, holders of common stock will receive shares of common stock and holders of Class B common stock will receive shares of Class B common stock. Neither the common stock nor the Class B common stock may be split, divided or combined unless the other is split, divided or combined equally.
 
The holders of common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share held. Holders of Class B common stock will be entitled to 10 votes for each share held. The common stock and the Class B common stock will vote together as one class on all matters subject to stockholder approval, except as set forth in the following sentence. The approval of the holders of common stock and of Class B common stock, each voting separately as a class, will be required to authorize issuances of additional shares of Class B common stock other than in connection with stock splits and stock dividends.
 
Shares of Class B common stock will be convertible into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis at any time at the option of the holder thereof. The Class B common stock will not be transferable except to the holder’s spouse, certain of such holder’s relatives, certain trusts established for the benefit of the holder, the holder’s spouse or relatives, corporations and partnerships beneficially owned and controlled by such holder, such holder’s spouse or relatives, charitable organizations and such holder’s estate. Upon any transfer made in violation of those restrictions, shares of Class B common stock will be automatically converted into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis.
 
Neither the holders of common stock nor the holders of Class B common stock will have any preemptive rights to subscribe for additional shares of our capital stock.
 
We expect that our common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.” We do not anticipate any public market for shares of our Class B common stock.
 
- 152 -
 


Preferred Stock
 
Our board of directors is authorized, without further stockholder approval, to issue from time to time up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series. The board of directors may fix or alter the designation, preferences, rights and any qualification, limitations, restrictions of the shares of any series, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption terms and prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series. No shares of our preferred stock are currently outstanding.
 
Warrants
 
In connection with an acquisition, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued Class A warrants to acquire 7,000,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $20.00 per share and Class B warrants to acquire 1,823,529 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $30.30 per share. With the exception of the exercise price, the Class A warrants and the Class B warrants have identical terms and provisions. Under the terms of these warrants, on the date of the spin-off, each holder of an outstanding and unexercised warrant is entitled to a warrant evidencing a right to purchase a number of shares of our capital stock that the holder would have received had the holder exercised the Vishay Intertechnology warrants immediately prior to the record date for the spin-off. The terms of the warrants to acquire our common stock will be the same as the terms of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants, except that the exercise price will be determined, subject to further adjustment in accordance with the terms of the warrants, according to the following formula:
 
E s = E o x P s / (P p + (r x P s ))

          where:
 
E s is the exercise price per share of our common stock of the warrants that we will issue.
E o
is the exercise price per share of the Vishay Intertechnology common stock of the relevant Vishay Intertechnology warrant immediately prior to adjustment for the spin-off.
P p
is the average of the daily market prices of the Vishay Intertechnology common stock for the ten full consecutive trading days following the date on which the spin-off is consummated.
P s is the fair market value per share of our common stock.
           r     
is the number of our shares distributed pursuant to the spin-off in respect of each share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock.

“Fair market value” for these purposes means the average daily market price of the shares of our common stock for the first ten consecutive trading days following the date on which the spin-off is consummated; provided that if our shares do not begin trading within two trading days of the consummation of the spinoff or do not trade for at least ten consecutive trading days within 20 days after the spin-off, then the “fair market value” of the shares of our common stock will be determined by an investment banking firm of national reputation and standing selected by Vishay Intertechnology and reasonably acceptable to a majority of the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants on the record date for the spin-off.
 
“Daily market price” for any trading day means the volume-weighted-average of the per share selling prices on the New York Stock Exchange or other principal United States securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which the relevant security is then listed or quoted or, if there are no reported sales of the relevant equity security on such trading day, the average of the high bid and low ask prices for the relevant equity security or, if there are no high bid and low ask prices, the daily market price will be the per share fair market value of the relevant equity security as determined by an investment banking firm of national reputation and standing selected by Vishay Intertechnology and reasonably acceptable to a majority of the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants.
 
- 153 -
 


Following the spin-off, the exercise price of each Vishay Intertechnology warrant will be adjusted in accordance with the following formula:
 
E n = E o x P p / (P p + (r x P s ))

          where:
 
          E n is the adjusted exercise price per share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants,
 
and the other symbols in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the preceding formula.
 
As of the distribution date, we intend to issue Class A warrants and Class B warrants to acquire shares of our common stock to the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants, as required by the term of those warrants. We will also enter into a warrant agreement with American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as warrant agent, in substantially the same form as the warrant agreement for the Vishay Intertechnology warrants, dated December 13, 2002. The Vishay Intertechnology warrant agreement was filed by Vishay Intertechnology as an exhibit to its Form 8-K dated December 23, 2002.
 
The warrant agreement, to which the form of warrants will be annexed, will be the document that governs our Class A warrants and Class B warrants, and it will be filed upon its execution, at or about the time of the separation. The following summary description of the warrants sets forth some general terms and provisions of the warrants, but the summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual text of the warrants and the warrant agreement. As used below, the term warrants refers to both our Class A warrants and Class B warrants.
 
Exercise
 
The warrants may be exercised at any time until their expiration date on December 13, 2012. Each warrant holder will be able to exercise the warrants, in whole or in part, by delivering to us the certificate representing the warrants, the exercise notice properly completed and executed and payment of the aggregate exercise price for the number of shares of our common stock as to which the warrant is being exercised. We will not issue any fractional shares of our common stock and instead will pay a cash adjustment equal to the product resulting from multiplying the fractional amount by the daily market value of one share of our common stock on the trading day prior to the date the warrant is exercised.
 
Exercise price
 
The exercise price of the warrants will be determined as set forth above. The exercise price, and the number of shares of our common stock, or the amount and type of other securities or property issuable upon exercise, will be subject to adjustment in the manner provided in the warrant agreement in any of the following circumstances:
 
  • if we declare a stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split or if there is a reclassification or reorganization of our common stock or if we make distributions on our common stock payable in common stock; or
     
  • if we issue any evidence of indebtedness, shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our common stock by reclassification of our common stock; distribute any rights, options or warrants to purchase or subscribe for any evidence of indebtedness, shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our common stock; distribute cash (other than regular quarterly or semi-annual cash dividends) or other property to all holders of our common stock; or issue by means of a capital reorganization other securities of ours in lieu of or in addition to common stock; or
- 154 -
 


  • if we distribute any rights, options or warrants to holders of our common stock at a price per share less than 90% of the daily market price of our common stock on the record date for the distribution; provided that if the exercise period is for a period of more than 60 days after the record date we will distribute the same rights, options or warrants to the warrant holders on the record date as if the warrant holders had exercised their warrants immediately prior to the record date; or
     
  • if any person or entity acquires us in a transaction in which we are merged with or into or consolidated with another person or entity, or if we sell or convey all or substantially all of our assets to another person or entity, in which case the holder of a warrant, at the holder’s election, will be entitled to receive either the kind and number of shares, securities, cash, assets or other property which the holder would otherwise have been entitled to receive had the holder exercised the warrants before the transaction, or, subject to certain exceptions, the cash value of the option according to the Black-Scholes pricing model, or, if the acquirer is a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act and is offering a combination of cash and shares, a warrant exercisable for securities of the acquirer having an adjusted exercise price but otherwise having the same terms as our warrant and cash; or
     
  • if we make a distribution to all holders of our common stock consisting of the capital stock of one of our subsidiaries or other business units, similar to the spin-off.
If we liquidate, dissolve or wind up our affairs, other than in connection with a consolidation, merger or sale or conveyance of all or substantially all of our assets or a spin-off transaction, then the warrants will expire at the close of business on the last full business day before the earliest record date fixed for the payment of any distributable amount on our common stock.
 
Transfer of Warrants
 
Each warrant may be presented for transfer at any time on or prior to its expiration date. Any proposed transfer of the warrants must be made pursuant either to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act or to an effective registration statement. In addition, each transfer must be made in accordance with the applicable securities laws of any state of the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction. If the transfer of the warrants is being made pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, we may require that the warrant holder deliver to us an agreement by the transferee to be bound by certain restrictions on transfer set forth in the warrant agreement. We may also require an opinion of counsel that the transfer complies with applicable securities laws.
 
Registration Rights
 
Under the terms of a securities investment and registration rights agreement, dated as of December 13, 2002, executed by Vishay Intertechnology in favor of the holders of the warrants, Vishay Intertechnology has agreed to take such action as is reasonably necessary to cause us to register our shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of our warrants on a resale registration statement on terms substantially identical to the terms and conditions of the Vishay Intertechnology agreement. These include but are not limited to the indemnification, piggyback registration and holdback provisions of that agreement. Also, upon the written request of one or more holders of our warrants requesting that Vishay Intertechnology effect the disposition of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise on a resale registration statement by means of an underwritten offering, Vishay Intertechnology is required to cause us to cooperate with the warrant holders to facilitate the underwritten offering. We will not be obligated to effect more than two underwritten offerings for all holders of warrants in the aggregate or more than one underwritten offering for the holders of warrants in any 12-month period, or effect an underwritten offering unless the offering will result in gross proceeds of not less than $30,000,000, before deducting underwriting commissions. Under the terms of the master separation agreement, we have agreed with Vishay Intertechnology that we will comply with these provisions.
 
- 155 -
 


Certain Provision of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
 
Certain provisions in our proposed amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws summarized below may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider to be in its best interests, including attempts that might result in a premium being paid over the market price for the shares held by stockholders. These provisions are intended to enhance the continuity and stability of the board of directors and its policies.
 
Board of Directors
 
Our certificate of incorporation will provide that our board of directors will have exclusive authority to establish the size of the board. This authority may serve to generally delay, deter or impede changes in control of our board of directors.
 
Class B Common Stock
 
Our Class B common stock will have 10 votes per share. As a result, we anticipate that following the separation, Dr. Felix Zandman will have voting power over 99.4% of our shares of Class B common stock, giving him the power to cast approximately 45% of the outstanding voting power of our company following the separation. For so long as Dr. Zandman or his successors retain voting power at this level, it is unlikely that a takeover of our company to which Dr. Zandman or those successors are opposed could be successfully implemented.
 
Special Stockholder Meetings
 
Under our proposed bylaws, only our board of directors or the chairman of our board of directors will be able to call a special meeting of stockholders.
 
Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder Nomination and Proposals
 
Under our proposed bylaws, stockholders of record will be able to nominate persons for election to our board of directors or bring other business constituting a proper matter for stockholder action only by providing proper notice to our secretary. Proper notice must be timely, in the case of annual meetings, no earlier than 90 days and no later than 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting, and must include, among other information, the name and address of the stockholder giving the notice; a representation that such stockholder is a holder of record of our common stock or Class B common stock as of the date of the notice, as well as written representations from each proposed nominee concerning the absence of any undisclosed voting commitments or compensatory arrangements, and certain other matters; if applicable, certain information relating to each person whom such stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director; and if applicable, a brief description of any other business and the text of any proposal such stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting and the reason for bringing such proposal.
 
- 156 -
 


Delaware Law
 
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) provides that if a person acquires 15% or more of the voting stock of a Delaware corporation, such person becomes an “interested stockholder” and may not engage in certain “business combinations” with the corporation for a period of three years from the time such person acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock, unless: (1) the board of directors approves the acquisition of stock or the merger transaction before the time that the person becomes an interested stockholder, (2) the interested stockholder owns at least 85% of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation at the time the merger transaction commences (excluding voting stock owned by directors who are also officers and certain employee stock plans), or (3) the merger transaction is approved by the board of directors and by the affirmative vote at a meeting, not by written consent, of stockholders holding two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder. Our board of directors will approve the spin-off for purposes of Section 203, such that any person who acquires 15% or more voting power of our company’s stock by virtue of the spin-off will not attain the status of an “interested stockholder” as a result thereof. A Delaware corporation may elect in its certificate of incorporation or bylaws not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL. We do not intend to make that election.
 
Limitation on Liability of Directors and Indemnification of Directors and Officers
 
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation has the power to indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation and certain other persons serving at the request of the corporation in related capacities against amounts paid and expenses incurred in connection with an action or proceeding to which he is or is threatened to be made a party by reason of such position, if such person shall have acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal proceeding, if such person had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful; provided that, in the case of actions brought by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the adjudicating court determines that such indemnification is proper under the circumstances.
 
Our certificate of incorporation provides that every person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation shall be indemnified by the corporation against all judgments, payments in settlement, fines, penalties, and other reasonable costs and expenses resulting from any action, proceeding, investigation or claim which is brought or threatened by or in the right of our company or by anyone else by reason of such person being or having been a director, officer, employee or agent of us or any act or omission of such person in such capacity. Such indemnification shall be available either if such person is wholly successful in defending such action or if, in the judgment of a court or the board of directors or in the opinion of independent legal counsel, such person acted in good faith in what he reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and was not adjudged liable to the corporation, and, in any criminal action, had no reasonable cause to believe that his action was unlawful. In the case of a derivative action, such indemnification shall not be made other than in respect of a court-approved settlement or if, in the opinion of independent counsel, the person satisfied the standard of conduct specified in the prior sentence, the action was without substantial merit, the settlement was in the best interests of our company and the payment is permissible under applicable law. Directors may authorize the advancement of reasonable costs and expenses in connection with any such action to the extent permitted under Delaware law.
 
Our certificate of incorporation further provides that no director shall have any personal liability to us or to our stockholders for any monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, to the extent permitted under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
 
- 157 -
 


We expect to maintain between $20 million and $30 million of insurance to reimburse our directors and officers and the directors and officers of our subsidiaries, for charges and expenses incurred by them for wrongful acts claimed against them by reason of their being or having been directors or officers of our company or any of its subsidiaries. Such insurance specifically excludes any director or officer for any charge or expense incurred in connection with various designated matters, including libel or slander, illegally obtained personal profits, profits recovered by us pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and deliberate dishonesty.
 
Other Matters
 
We intend to furnish to our stockholders annual reports containing financial statements audited by an independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young LLP has been selected as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010.
 
We expect that our common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VPG.”
 
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company will be the transfer agent and registrar of our common stock and Class B common stock.
 
- 158 -
 


DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
 
Exchangeable Notes
 
In connection with the same acquisition in which Vishay Intertechnology issued its warrants, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or principal) amount of its floating rate unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102. The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay Intertechnology on December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of December 13, 2002. The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange for shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called by Vishay Intertechnology for similar consideration. The put/call rate is currently $17.00 of nominal amount of the notes per share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock.
 
Under the terms of the put and call agreement, by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is required to take action, and cause us to take action, so that the existing notes are deemed exchanged as of the date of the spin-off, for a combination of new notes of Vishay Intertechnology and notes issued by us. Under the terms of the master separation agreement, we have agreed with Vishay Intertechnology that we will comply with these provisions. The terms of the new Vishay Intertechnology notes and our notes will be identical to the terms of the existing notes, except for adjustments to the put/call rate, the nominal amounts of the notes and certain other stock price-dependent parameters described below.
 
As provided in the put and call agreement, the put/call rate of the notes that we will issue, and the put/call rate of the new Vishay Intertechnology notes, will be determined in accordance with the following formulas, respectively:
 
R s  =  R o x P s  / (P p + (r x P s ))
R n  =  R o x P p / (P p + (r x P s ))
 
where:
 
R s   
is the put/call rate of the notes that we will issue;
     
R n   is the put/call rate of the new Vishay Intertechnology notes;
 
R o   is the put/call rate of the existing Vishay Intertechnology notes immediately prior to adjustment for the spin-off;
 
P p   is the average of the daily market prices of Vishay Intertechnology common stock for the ten consecutive trading days following the date on which the spin-off is consummated;
 
r   is the number of our shares of common stock distributed pursuant to the spin-off in respect of each share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock; and
 
          P s   is the fair market value per share of our shares of common stock.

Fair market value of the shares of our common stock and daily market price are defined as described above under “Capital Stock—Warrants.”
 
- 159 -
 


The nominal amount of each note that we issue, and the nominal amount of each new note that Vishay Intertechnology will issue, will be determined in accordance with the following formulas, respectively:
 
A s  =  A o x (P s x r) / (P p + (P s x r))
A n  =  A o x P p / (P p + (r x P s ))

where:
 
A s   is the nominal amount of the note that we issue in exchange for a Vishay Intertechnology note;
 
A n   is the nominal amount of the new Vishay Intertechnology note issued in exchange for a Note;
   
          A o is the nominal amount of the existing Vishay Intertechnology note,

and the other symbols in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the first formula in this section.
 
These adjustments will become effective immediately after their determination, retroactive to the date of the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology will be obligated to give written notice of the spin-off to the holder of the existing notes at least ten days before the record date for the spin-off.
 
We intend to issue the notes as soon as practicable following the distribution date, after the terms of the notes that we will issue are determined. We will also execute a note instrument and enter into a put and call agreement with American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as put/call agent, in substantially the same form as the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology documents, which were filed by Vishay Intertechnology as an exhibit to its Form 8-K dated December 23, 2002. The note instrument and the put and call agreement will be the documents that will govern the notes that we issue. They will be filed upon their execution, as soon as practicable following the separation. The following summary description of the notes sets forth some general terms and provisions of the notes, but the summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual text of the note instrument and the put and call agreement.
 
Interest
 
The notes will bear interest at LIBOR. Interest will be payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each calendar year. Interest on any overdue amounts under the notes will be payable at the rate of 1% per annum over the otherwise applicable rate. If at any time ending on December 31, 2010, our common stock has a market value equal to or more than the target price per share (referred to in the put and call agreement as the interest rate hurdle) for 30 or more consecutive trading days, then the rate of interest on the notes for all interest periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011 will be 50% of LIBOR.
 
- 160 -
 


The interest rate hurdle of the notes we will issue, and the interest rate hurdle of the new notes that Vishay Intertechnology will issue, will be determined in accordance with the following formulas, respectively:
 
I s  =  I o x P s / (P p + (r x P s ))
I n  =  I o x P p / (P p + (r x P s ))

  where:
 
I s   is the interest rate hurdle for our notes;
 
I n   is the adjusted interest rate hurdle for the new Vishay Intertechnology notes;
 
          I o is the interest rate hurdle of the existing Vishay Intertechnology notes immediately prior to spin-off, with the current interest rate hurdle being $45.00,

and the other symbols in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the first formula in this section.
 
Market value has the same meaning as daily market price, which is defined under “Capital Stock—Warrants.”
 
Transfer
 
Other than in the case of transfers to affiliates, the notes will only be transferable in a minimum nominal amount equal to the lesser of (i) $2,000,000 and (ii) the total nominal amount of all notes held by a transferor and its affiliates. Transfer of the notes must be pursuant to an available exemption from registration under the Securities Act.
 
Exchange (Put and Call)
 
Put . At any time until the maturity date of the notes, a holder of the notes will be able to exercise the right to require us to exchange the notes for shares of our common stock. This is referred to as the “put” right. The put may be exercised with respect to the aggregate nominal amount of all notes held by the holder or a portion of the nominal amount in integral multiples of $2,000,000. The number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the put will equal (x) the nominal amount of the notes for which the put is being exercised, divided by (y) the then-applicable put/call rate. To exercise the put with respect to a note, the holder will be required to surrender to the put/call agent the certificate or certificates representing the notes to be exchanged together with a complete put exercise notice; deliver a form of transfer in specified form, executed by the holder with the name of the transferee left blank; and pay any transfer or similar tax required to be paid by the holder.
 
We will not issue a fractional share of common stock upon exchange of a note. Instead, we will deliver cash for the fractional share equal to an amount determined by multiplying (i) such fractional share by (ii) the closing sale price of our common stock on the principal exchange or quotation system on which the common stock is then traded (or if there is no sale of the common stock reported on such trading day, the average of the low ask and high bid prices for the common stock on such trading day on the last trading day prior to the date the put is exercised and rounding the product to the nearest whole cent.
 
- 161 -
 


Call . At any time beginning on January 2, 2018 and ending 30 days before the maturity date of the notes, we at our option will have the right to call all of the notes in exchange for the issuance of shares of our common stock or cash. This is referred to as the “call” right.
 
Upon exercise of the call, if our common stock has had a daily market price at or above the call target price then in effect for 20 or more out of 30 consecutive trading days at any time after the date the notes are issued, we will issue to the holders of the notes that number of shares of common stock equal to (x) the nominal amount of the notes exchanged divided by (y) the put/call rate then in effect and pay to the holders an amount in cash equal to accrued but unpaid interest on the notes. If the common stock has not had a daily market price at or above the call target price for 20 or more out of 30 consecutive trading days at any time after the date the notes are issued, at our election, we will either (I) issue to the holders of the notes a number of shares of our common stock equal to (x) the nominal amount of the notes exchanged divided by (y) the average of the daily market prices for the ten trading days ending two trading days prior to the date that notice of the call is first sent to the holders, and pay to the holders an amount in cash equal to accrued but unpaid interest on the notes; or (II) pay to the holders $1.00 for each $1.00 nominal amount of notes subject to the call, plus cash equal to any accrued but unpaid interest to the date of the call.
 
The call target price of the notes we will issue, and the call target price of the new notes that Vishay Intertechnology will issue, will be determined in accordance with the following formulas, respectively:
 
T s  =  T o x P s / (P p + (r x P s ))
T n  =  T o x P p / (P p + (r x P s ))
 
  where:
 
T s   is the call target price for our notes;
 
T n   is the adjusted call target price for the new Vishay Intertechnology notes;
 
          T o   is the target price of the existing Vishay Intertechnology notes immediately prior to spin-off, with the current target price being $35.00,

and the other symbols in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the first formula in this section.
 
Daily market price has the meaning set forth under “Capital Stock—Warrants.”
 
We will not issue a fractional share of common stock upon exchange of a note, and instead will pay a cash amount determined as described above under the provisions governing the put right.
 
At least 30 days but not more than 60 days before the date of a call, we will be required to send a notice of redemption to the holders of the notes.
 
- 162 -
 


Adjustments
 
The put/call rate, the interest rate hurdle and the call target price will be subject to adjustment in the manner provided in the put and call agreement in the following circumstances:
  • if we declare a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or if there is a reclassification or reorganization of our common stock or if we make distributions on our common stock payable in common stock; or
     
  • if we issue any evidence of indebtedness, shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our common stock by reclassification of our common stock; distribute any rights, options or warrants to purchase or subscribe for any evidence of indebtedness, shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our common stock; distribute cash (other than regular quarterly or semi-annual cash dividends) or other property to all holders of our common stock; or issue by means of a capital reorganization other securities of ours in lieu of or in addition to common stock; or
     
  • if we distribute any rights, options or warrants to holders of our common stock at a price per share less than 90% of the daily market price of our common stock on the record date for the distribution; provided that if the exercise period is for a period of more than 60 days after the record date we will distribute the same rights, options or warrants to the holders of notes on the record date as if the holders had exchanged their notes immediately prior to the record date; or
     
  • if any person or entity acquires us in a transaction in which we are merged with or into or consolidated with another person or entity, or if we sell or convey all or substantially all of our assets to another person or entity, in which case the acquirer will be required to provide a full and unconditional guarantee of the notes, and the notes will become exercisable for shares of the acquirer, on adjusted terms in accordance with the put and call agreement; provided that if the acquirer does not have common equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act or for whatever reason the acquirer cannot comply with the forgoing provisions or the acquirer otherwise so chooses, the notes will be called in accordance with the call provisions described above immediately prior to the transaction; or
     
  • if we make a distribution to all holders of our common stock consisting of the capital stock of one of our subsidiaries or other business units, similar to the spin-off.
If we liquidate, dissolve or wind up our affairs, other than in connection with a consolidation, merger or sale or conveyance of all or substantially all of our assets or a spin-off transaction, then the right to exchange the notes will expire at the close of business on the last full business day before the earliest record date fixed for the payment of any distributable amount on our common stock.
 
Registration rights
 
Under the terms of the securities investment and registration rights agreement, Vishay Intertechnology has agreed to take such action as is reasonably necessary to cause us to register our shares of common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes on a resale registration statement on terms substantially identical to the terms and conditions of the aforementioned agreement. The terms of registration are the same as for the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, as described above. We will not be obligated to effect more than two underwritten offerings for all holders of notes in the aggregate or more than one underwritten offering for the holders of notes in any 12 month period, or effect an underwritten offering unless the offering will result in gross proceeds of not less than $30,000,000, before deducting underwriting commissions. Under the terms of the master separation agreement, we have agreed with Vishay Intertechnology that we will comply with these provisions.
 
- 163 -
 


Other Indebtedness
 
Our Japanese subsidiary will continue to have debt of approximately $1.6 million outstanding.
 
We expect to enter into a revolving credit facility in the approximate amount of $40 million with a consortium of banks to provide us with flexibility and additional liquidity, shortly after the separation. We anticipate that the credit facility will include customary covenants, including restrictions on our ability to pay dividends or make other distributions on our common stock and Class B common stock.
 
We historically have had significant amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology affiliates. The remaining balance of $33.4 million will be repaid at or prior to the spin-off. However, if our net cash position is less than $58.5 million as of the spin-off date, Vishay Intertechnology will make a capital contribution to us pursuant to the master separation agreement, up to a cap of $58.5 million. For more information concerning this capital contribution provision, see note (g) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54.
 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
 
We have filed a registration statement on Form 10 with the SEC with respect to the shares of our common stock being distributed as contemplated by this information statement. This information statement is a part of, and does not contain all of the information set forth in, the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect to our company and our common stock, please refer to the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules. Statements made in this information statement relating to any contract or other document are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual contract or document. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at Station Place, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including us, that file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that we file with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Information contained on any website referenced in this information statement is not incorporated by reference in this information statement or the registration statement of which it forms a part.
 
As a result of the distribution, we will become subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, we will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
 
We intend to furnish holders of our common stock with annual reports containing consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and audited and reported on, with an opinion expressed, by an independent registered public accounting firm.
 
You should rely only on the information contained in this information statement or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized any person to provide you with different information or to make any representation not contained in this information statement.
 
In addition, our website can be found on the Internet at www.vishaypg.com. The website contains information about us and our operations. Copies of each of our filings with the SEC can be viewed and downloaded free of charge from our website as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. To view the reports, access vishaypg.com and click on “SEC Filings.”
 
- 164 -
 


INDEX TO COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Audited combined and consolidated financial statements
       as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-3
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets F-4
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations F-5
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-6
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Equity F-7
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements F-8

Unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements
     as of April 3, 2010 and for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
 
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets F-51
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations F-52
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-53
Combined and Consolidated Statement of Equity F-54
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements F-55
 
F-1
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This page intentionally left blank.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F-2
 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Board of Directors of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
 
We have audited the accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (the “Business”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related combined and consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Business’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Business’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Business’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined and consolidated financial position of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the combined and consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2010
 
F-3
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
 
December 31,
2009
     December 31,
2008
Assets
Current assets:  
       Cash and cash equivalents $ 63,192 $ 70,381
       Accounts receivable, net 23,345   32,124
       Net inventories   43,802 57,992
       Deferred income taxes 4,960 5,872
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets 4,522 7,018
Total current assets      139,821 173,387
 
Property and equipment, net 44,599 50,703
Intangible assets, net 17,217 20,163
Other assets 8,142 10,610
              Total assets $ 209,779 $      254,863
 
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
       Notes payable to banks $ 9 $ 550
       Trade accounts payable 5,805 8,552
       Net payable to affiliates   18,495 -
       Payroll and related expenses 6,619 9,996
       Other accrued expenses 4,573 6,920
       Income taxes 1,647 1,462
       Current portion of long-term debt 184 544
Total current liabilities 37,332 28,024
 
Long-term debt, less current portion 1,551 1,761
Deferred income taxes 5,993 9,389
Net payable to affiliates - 47,436
Other liabilities 6,141 8,065
Accrued pension and other postretirement costs 10,549   9,908
Total liabilities 61,566 104,583
 
Commitments and contingencies
 
Equity:
       Parent net investment 157,258 163,354
       Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (9,168 ) (13,196 )
       Total Parent equity 148,090 150,158
Noncontrolling interests 123 122
Total equity 148,213 150,280
Total liabilities and equity $ 209,779 $ 254,863  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-4
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
 
Years ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007
Net revenues $      171,991        $      241,700      $      239,036
Costs of products sold 119,286 161,804 154,525
Gross profit 52,705 79,896 84,511
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses 43,356 51,714 48,017
Restructuring and severance costs 2,048 6,349 356
Impairment of goodwill - 93,465 -
Operating income (loss) 7,301 (71,632 ) 36,138
 
Other income (expense):
       Interest expense (1,237 ) (1,574 ) (2,294 )
       Other 714 4,780 2,788
              Other income (expense) - net (523 ) 3,206 494
 
Income (loss) before taxes 6,778 (68,426 ) 36,632
 
Income tax expense 5,057 5,689 8,829
 
Net earnings (loss) 1,721 (74,115 ) 27,803
Less: net earnings attributable to
       noncontrolling interests 17   15 111
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Parent $ 1,704 $ (74,130 ) $ 27,692  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-5
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
 
Years ended December 31,
2009      2008      2007
Operating activities
Net earnings (loss) $ 1,721 $      (74,115 ) $ 27,803
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to  
       net cash provided by operating activities:
              Impairment of goodwill - 93,465 -
              Depreciation and amortization 11,465 10,851 9,797
              (Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment 34 (1,189 ) (1,155 )
              Inventory write-offs for obsolescence 3,114 1,555 1,881
              Deferred income taxes 139 (3,162 ) 780
              Other (2,177 ) 1,594 (1,724 )
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities,
       net of effects of businesses acquired:  
              Accounts receivable 9,407 5,384 (2,354 )
              Inventories 11,694 (6,286 ) (331 )
              Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,562 (2,328 ) (1,430 )
              Accounts payable (2,821 ) (1,217 ) (2,175 )
              Other current liabilities (5,902 ) (2,091 ) 973
Net cash provided by operating activities 29,236 22,461 32,065
 
Investing activities
Capital expenditures (2,181 ) (7,391 ) (8,329 )
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 812 1,554 1,531
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired - (24,272 )      (46,809 )
Proceeds from sale of business - - 16,097
Other investing activities 1,438 450 500
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 69 (29,659 ) (37,010 )
 
Financing activities
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases (569 ) (1,129 ) (2,327 )
Net changes in short-term borrowings (541 ) (22 ) (3,043 )
Distributions to non-controlling interests (16 )   (64 ) (4 )
Transactions with Vishay Intertechnology      (36,876 ) 12,600 (11,767 )
Contributions from Vishay Intertechnology for acquisitions - 14,653 47,218
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (38,002 ) 26,038 30,077
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 1,508 (5,262 ) 1,533
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (7,189 ) 13,578 26,665
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 70,381 56,803 30,138
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 63,192 $ 70,381   $ 56,803  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-6
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands)
 
      Accumulated                  
Parent Other Total
Net Comprehensive Parent Noncontrolling Total
Investment Income (Loss) Equity Interests Equity
Balance at January 1, 2007 $ 155,598 $ (1,482 ) $ 154,116 $ 64 $ 154,180
Net earnings (loss) 27,692 - 27,692 111 27,803
Foreign currency translation adjustment - 2,201 2,201 - 2,201
Pension and other
       postretirement actuarial items - 634 634 - 634
Comprehensive income (loss) 30,527 111 30,638
Contribution of PM Group 47,218 - 47,218 - 47,218
Other transactions with Vishay - net (2,586 ) - (2,586 ) - (2,586 )
Stock compensation expense 145 - 145 - 145
Distributions to noncontrolling interests - - - (4 ) (4 )
Balance at December 31, 2007 $ 228,067 $ 1,353 $ 229,420 $ 171 $ 229,591
Net earnings (loss) (74,130 ) - (74,130 ) 15 (74,115 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment - (14,568 ) (14,568 ) - (14,568 )
Pension and other
       postretirement actuarial items - 19 19 - 19
Comprehensive income (loss) (88,679 ) 15 (88,664 )
Contribution of Powertron GmbH 14,653 - 14,653 - 14,653
Other transactions with Vishay - net (5,359 ) - (5,359 ) - (5,359 )
Stock compensation expense 123 - 123 - 123
Distributions to noncontrolling interests - - - (64 ) (64 )
Balance at December 31, 2008 $        163,354 $        (13,196 ) $        150,158 $        122 $        150,280
Net earnings (loss) 1,704 - 1,704 17 1,721
Foreign currency translation adjustment - 4,523 4,523 - 4,523
Pension and other
       postretirement actuarial items - (495 ) (495 ) - (495 )
Comprehensive income (loss) 5,732 17 5,749
Other transactions with Vishay - net (7,935 ) - (7,935 ) - (7,935 )
Stock compensation expense 135 - 135 - 135
Distributions to noncontrolling interests - - - (16 ) (16 )
Balance at December 31, 2009 $ 157,258 $ (9,168 ) $ 148,090 $ 123 $ 148,213  
 

See accompanying notes.
 
F-7
 


Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
 
Background
 
On October 27, 2009, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (“Vishay Intertechnology”) announced that it intends to spin off its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses into an independent, publicly traded company to be named Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (the “Business”). The spin-off is expected to take the form of a tax-free stock dividend to Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders.
 
The Business is an international designer, manufacturer and marketer of Foil Technology Products (strain gages, ultra-precision foil resistors, current sensors) and Weighing Modules and Control Systems (load cells/transducers, instruments, weighing modules, and control systems) for a wide variety of applications.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The Business is currently part of Vishay Intertechnology and its assets and liabilities consist of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses.
 
The Business is conducted by various direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology. In this context, no direct ownership relationship existed among the various units comprising the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements have been derived from Vishay Intertechnology’s historical accounting records and are presented on a carve-out basis.
 
Before effecting the spin-off, all assets and liabilities associated with the Business will be contributed to Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
 
The combined and consolidated statement of operations includes all revenues and expenses directly attributable to the Business, including costs for facilities, functions, and services used by the Business at shared sites and costs for certain functions and services performed by centralized Vishay Intertechnology organizations outside of the defined scope of the Business and directly charged to the Business based on usage. The results of operations also include allocations of (i) costs for administrative functions and services performed on behalf of the Business by centralized staff groups within Vishay Intertechnology, (ii) Vishay Intertechnology general corporate expenses, (iii) pension and other postemployment benefit costs, (iv) interest expense, and (v) current and deferred income taxes. See Notes 3, 7, 8, 10, and 15 for a description of the allocation methodologies utilized.
 
All of the allocations and estimates in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements are based on assumptions that Vishay Intertechnology management believes are reasonable, and reasonably approximate the historical costs that the Business would have incurred as a separate entity for the same level of service or support.  However, these allocations and estimates are not necessarily indicative of the costs and expenses that would have resulted if the Business had been operated as a separate entity.
 
Following the spin-off, the Business will incur incremental costs to both replace Vishay Intertechnology support and to allow the Business to function as an independent, publicly-traded company.
 
Actual costs that may have been incurred if the Business had been a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or performed by employees, and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure.  Following the spin-off, the Business will perform these functions using its own resources or purchases these services.
 
F-8
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Principles of Combination and Consolidation
 
The combined and consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the individual entities which comprise the Business in which Vishay Intertechnology maintained a controlling financial interest. For those subsidiaries in which the Business’s ownership is less than 100 percent, the outside stockholders’ interests are shown as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets. Investments in affiliates over which the Business has significant influence but not a controlling interest are carried on the equity basis. Investments in affiliates over which the Business does not have significant influence are accounted for by the cost method.
 
Certain transactions have been accounted for as mergers of entities under common control and thus recorded in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Accordingly, the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements include the accounts of these entities for all relevant periods presented.
 
All transactions, accounts, and profits between individual members comprising the Business have been eliminated in combination.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the combined and consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Business recognizes revenue on product sales during the period when the sales process is complete. This generally occurs when products are shipped to the customer in accordance with terms of an agreement of sale, title and risk of loss have been transferred, collectibility is reasonably assured, and pricing is fixed or determinable. For a small percentage of sales where title and risk of loss passes at point of delivery, the Business recognizes revenue upon delivery to the customer, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
 
Some of the Business’s larger systems products have post-shipment obligations, such as customer acceptance, training, or installation. In such circumstances, revenue is deferred until the obligation has been completed unless such obligation is deemed inconsequential and perfunctory.
 
Given the specialized nature of our products, the Business generally does not allow product returns except for quality issues.
 
Shipping and Handling Costs
 
Shipping and handling costs are included in costs of products sold.
 
F-9
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The amount charged to expense for research and development aggregated $4,550,000, $4,848,000, and $4,502,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The Business spends additional amounts for the development of machinery and equipment for new processes and for cost reduction measures.
 
Income Taxes
 
The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax bases of the Business’s assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. Valuation allowances have been established for deferred tax assets which the Business believes do not meet the “more likely than not” criteria established by ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes . This criterion requires a level of judgment regarding future taxable income, which may be revised due to changes in market conditions, tax laws, or other factors. If the Business’s assumptions and estimates change in the future, valuation allowances established may be increased, resulting in increased tax expense. Conversely, if the Business is ultimately able to utilize all or a portion of the deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance has been established, then the related portion of the valuation allowance can be released, resulting in decreased tax expense.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents includes demand deposits and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. Highly liquid investments with maturities greater than three months are classified as short-term investments. There were no investments classified as short-term investments at December 31, 2009 or 2008.
 
The Business’s subsidiaries in Europe historically participated in a formal cash pooling agreement, with Vishay Europe GmbH, an affiliate company, acting as the cash pool leader, effectively serving as a bank for these subsidiaries. The individual entity has discretion over the use of its cash, and accordingly, the combined and consolidated financial statements classify the cash pool balances as “cash and cash equivalents.”
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
The Business maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The allowance is determined through an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable and assessments of risk that are based on historical trends and an evaluation of the impact of current and projected economic conditions. The Business evaluates the past-due status of its trade receivables based on contractual terms of sale. If the financial condition of the Business’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $662,000 and $737,000, respectively. Bad debt expense (income realized upon subsequent collection) was $362,000, $(477,000), and $133,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
F-10
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market. Inventories are adjusted for estimated obsolescence and written down to net realizable value based upon estimates of future demand, technology developments, and market conditions.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment is carried at cost and is depreciated principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets. Machinery and equipment are being depreciated over useful lives of seven to ten years. Buildings and building improvements are being depreciated over useful lives of twenty to forty years. Construction in progress is not depreciated until the assets are placed in service. Depreciation of capital lease assets is included in total depreciation expense. Depreciation expense was $8,446,000, $8,410,000, and $8,130,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Gains and losses on the disposal of assets which do not qualify for presentation as discontinued operations are included in the determination of operating margin (within selling, general, and administrative expenses).
 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but rather are tested for impairment at least annually. These tests are performed more frequently if there are triggering events.
 
Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Patents and acquired technology are being amortized over useful lives of seven to twenty years. Customer relationships are being amortized over useful lives of five to fifteen years. Trade names are being amortized over useful lives of seven to ten years. Non-competition agreements are being amortized over periods of five to ten years. The Business continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
 
ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other , prescribes a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. In the first step, the Business determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares that fair value to the net book value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis (an income approach) and a comparable companies market multiple approach.
 
If the net book value of the reporting unit were to exceed the fair value, the Business would then perform the second step of the impairment test, which requires allocation of the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, with any residual fair value being allocated to goodwill. An impairment charge will be recognized only when the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount.
 
For the purposes of the combined and consolidated financial statements presented on a stand-alone basis, the Business has evaluated its goodwill using its operating segments, namely, Foil Technology Products and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, as its reporting units.
 
As more fully described in Note 5, in light of a sustained decline in market capitalization for Vishay Intertechnology and its peer group companies, and other factors, Vishay Intertechnology determined that an impairment test was necessary as of the end of the second, third, and fourth fiscal quarters of 2008.
 
F-11
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Based on Vishay Intertechnology’s interim impairment tests performed as of the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008, the Business performed retrospective goodwill impairment tests for its reporting units as of the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008.
 
The Business’s required annual impairment test is completed as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter of each year. The interim impairment test performed as of September 27, 2008, the last day of the fiscal third quarter, was effectively the Business’s annual impairment test for 2008. There was no impairment identified through the annual impairment test completed in 2007.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
The carrying value of long-lived assets held-and-used, other than goodwill, is evaluated when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset group is considered impaired when the total projected undiscounted cash flows from such asset group are separately identifiable and are less than the carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset group. Fair market value is determined primarily using present value techniques based on projected cash flows from the asset group. Losses on long-lived assets held-for-sale, other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, are determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for disposal costs.
 
Available-for-Sale Securities
 
Other assets include investments in marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These assets are held in trust related to the Business’s nonqualified pension and deferred compensation plans. See Note 15. These assets are reported at fair value, based on quoted market prices as of the end of the reporting period. Unrealized gains and losses are reported, net of their related tax consequences, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in equity until sold. At the time of sale, any gains (losses) calculated by the specific identification method are recognized as a reduction (increase) to benefits expense, within selling, general, and administrative expenses.
 
Financial Instruments
 
The Business uses financial instruments in the normal course of its business, including from time to time, derivative financial instruments. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no outstanding derivative instruments.
 
The Business reports derivative instruments on the combined and consolidated balance sheet at their fair values. The accounting for changes in fair value depends upon the purpose of the derivative instrument and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. For instruments designated as hedges, the effective portion of gains or losses is reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and the ineffective portion, if any, is reported in current period net earnings (loss). Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges are recorded in current period net earnings (loss).
 
F-12
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Foreign Currency Translation
 
The Business has significant operations outside of the United States. The Business finances its operations in Europe and certain locations in Asia in local currencies, and accordingly, these subsidiaries utilize the local currency as their functional currency. The Business’s operations in Israel and certain locations in Asia are largely financed in U.S. dollars, and accordingly, these subsidiaries utilize the U.S. dollar as their functional currency.
 
For those subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities in the combined and consolidated balance sheets have been translated at the rate of exchange as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments do not impact the combined and consolidated statements of operations and are reported as a separate component of equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the results of operations.
 
For those foreign subsidiaries where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, all foreign currency financial statement amounts are remeasured into U.S. dollars. Exchange gains and losses arising from remeasurement of foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are included in the combined and consolidated statements of operations.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
Compensation costs related to share-based payments are recognized in the combined and consolidated financial statements. The amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity (or liability) instruments issued. Compensation cost is recognized over the period that an officer, employee, or non-employee director provides service in exchange for the award. For options and restricted stock units subject to graded vesting, the Business recognizes expense over the service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in-substance, multiple awards.
 
Commitments and Contingencies
 
Liabilities for loss contingencies, including environmental remediation costs, arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, penalties, and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. The costs for a specific environmental remediation site are discounted if the aggregate amount of the obligation and the amount and timing of the cash payments for that site are fixed or reliably determinable based upon information derived from the remediation plan for that site. Accrued liabilities for environmental matters recorded at December 31, 2009 and 2008 do not include claims against third parties.
 
F-13
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-01, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC Topic 105), which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“the Codification” or “ASC”) as the official single source of authoritative GAAP. All existing accounting standards are superseded. All other accounting guidance not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification also includes all relevant Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) guidance organized using the same topical structure in separate sections within the Codification.
 
Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.
 
The Codification is not intended to change GAAP, but it changes the way GAAP is organized and presented. The Codification’s principal impact on the Business’s financial statements is limited to disclosures as all future references to authoritative accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with the Codification.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (ASC Topic 820). This statement defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The statement was to be effective for the Business as of January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-2 (ASC Topic 820-10-65), which provided a one-year delayed application of SFAS No. 157 (ASC Topic 820) for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Accordingly, the Business only partially applied SFAS No. 157 (ASC Topic 820) as of January 1, 2008. The partial application of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity, and the adoption, on January 1, 2009, of the remaining aspects which were deferred by FSP SFAS 157-2 (ASC Topic 820-10-65) did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141-R, Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805). While retaining the fundamental requirements of the previous GAAP, this new statement makes various modifications to the accounting for contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, purchased in-process research and development, acquisition-related transaction costs, acquisition-related restructuring costs, and changes in tax valuation allowances and tax uncertainty accruals. The Business adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009. Earlier adoption was prohibited.
 
F-14
 


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (ASC Topic 810). SFAS No. 160 (ASC Topic 810) amends GAAP to establish accounting and reporting guidance for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, this statement requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. The Business adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009. The presentation and disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 160 (ASC Topic 810) have been applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (ASC Topic 815) . This statement requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, and therefore improves the transparency of financial reporting. The Business adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial statements.
 
In April 2008, the FASB staff issued FSP SFAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (ASC Topic 350-30-65) . This guidance is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 (ASC Topic 350), and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141-R (ASC Topic 805) when the underlying arrangement includes renewal or extension of terms that would require substantial costs or require a material modification to the asset upon renewal or extension. Companies estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must now consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension as adjusted by SFAS No. 142’s (ASC Topic 350) entity-specific factors. The Business adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial statements.
 
In December 2008, the FASB staff issued FSP SFAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (ASC Topic 715-20-65-2) . This guidance requires enhanced disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The Business has provided these disclosures in Note 15. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
 
In April 2009, the FASB staff issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC Topic 820-10-65) . This guidance clarifies the methodology to be used to determine fair value when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. This guidance also reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, as stated in SFAS No. 157 (ASC Topic 820), which is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction. It also reaffirms the need to use judgment to determine if a formerly active market has become inactive, as well as to determine fair values when markets have become inactive. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial statements.
 
F-15
 


Note 3 – Related Party Transactions
 
Throughout the period covered by the combined and consolidated financial statements, the Business had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. While these transactions are not necessarily indicative of the terms the Business would have achieved had the Business been a separate entity, management believes they are reasonable.
 
Historically, the Business has used the corporate services of Vishay Intertechnology for a variety of functions including treasury, tax, legal, internal audit, human resources, and risk management. After the spin-off, the Business will be an independent, publicly traded company. The Business expects to incur additional costs associated with being an independent, publicly traded company. These additional anticipated costs are not reflected in its historical combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Sales Organizations
 
A portion of the Business’s Foil Technology products are sold by the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization, which operates as regionally-based legal entities. The third-party sale of these products is presented in the combined and consolidated financial statements as if it were made by the Business, although legal entities outside of the defined scope of the Business actually made these sales. Third-party sales made through the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization totaled $13,006,000, $16,909,000, and $15,319,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
The selling entities receive selling commissions on these sales. Commission rates are set at the beginning of each year based on budgeted selling expenses expected to be incurred by the Vishay Intertechnology sales organization. Commission expense charged to the Business by the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization was $704,000, $654,000, and $529,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.
 
The net cash generated by these transactions is retained by the Vishay Intertechnology selling entity, and is presented in the combined and consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in parent net investment, and is presented in the combined and consolidated statements of cash flows as a financing activity in the caption “Transactions with Vishay Intertechnology.”
 
These sales activities will be transitioned to the Business’s dedicated sales forces shortly after the spin-off.
 
Shared Facilities
 
The Business and operations of Vishay Intertechnology outside the defined scope of the Business share certain manufacturing and administrative sites. Costs are allocated based on relative usage of the respective facilities.
 
Following the spin-off, the Business and Vishay Intertechnology will continue to share certain manufacturing locations. The Business will own one location in Israel and one location in Japan, and will lease space to Vishay Intertechnology. Vishay Intertechnology will own one location in Israel and one location in the United States and lease space to the Business.
 
F-16
 


Note 3 – Related Party Transactions
 
Administrative Service Sharing Agreements
 
The combined and consolidated financial statements include transactions with other Vishay Intertechnology operations involving administrative services (including expenses primarily related to personnel, insurance, logistics, other overhead functions, corporate IT support, and network communications support) that were provided to the Business by Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. Amounts charged to the Business for these services during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $2,483,000, $1,859,000, and $1,451,000, respectively.
 
The Business will be required to assume the responsibility for these functions, either internally or from third-party vendors, following the spin-off. Under the terms of a transition services agreement that the Business expects to enter into with Vishay Intertechnology prior to the consummation of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will provide to the Business, for a fee, specified support services for a period of 18 months after the spin-off.
 
Allocated Corporate Overhead Costs
 
The costs of certain services that are provided by the Vishay Intertechnology corporate office to the Business have been reflected in the combined and consolidated financial statements, including charges for services such as accounting matters for all SEC filings, investor relations, tax services, cash management, legal services, and risk management on a global basis. These allocated costs are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined and consolidated statements of operations, and are presented in the combined and consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in parent net investment.
 
The total amount of allocated costs was $1,813,000, $2,771,000, and $2,449,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These costs were allocated on the ratio of Business revenues to total revenues and represent management’s reasonable allocation of the costs incurred. However, these amounts are not representative of the costs necessary for the Business to operate as an independent, publicly traded company.
 
F-17
 


Note 3 – Related Party Transactions
 
Centralized Cash Management
 
Vishay Intertechnology uses a centralized approach to cash management in the United States and Europe.
 
In the United States, cash deposits from the Business historically were transferred to Vishay Intertechnology on a regular basis and were netted against intercompany payables, or occasionally remitted to the parent as a dividend. See “Net Payable to Affiliates” in Note 8.
 
The Business’s subsidiaries in Europe historically participated in a formal cash pooling agreement, with Vishay Europe GmbH, an affiliate company, acting as the cash pool leader, effectively serving as a bank for these subsidiaries. Each day, the individual participant entity can either deposit funds into the cash pool account from the collection of receivables or withdraw funds from the account to fund working capital or other cash needs of the participant entity. At the end of the day, the cash pool leader sweeps all cash balances into the cash pool leader’s account, or funds any overdrawn accounts so that each cash pool participant account has a zero balance at the end of the day. The individual entity has discretion over the use of its cash, and accordingly, the combined and consolidated financial statements classify the cash pool balances as “cash and cash equivalents.” The Business’s subsidiaries have withdrawn from the European cash pool as of December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, the Business had $26,403,000 of cash deposited with the European cash pool.
 
Vishay Europe GmbH, as cash pool leader, pays interest on these funds based on the prevailing interest rates at third-party lending institutions in Europe. The combined and consolidated financial statements reflect cash pool interest income of $302,000, $935,000, and $497,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
Net Payable to Affiliates
 
See Note 8.
 
F-18
 


Note 4 - Acquisition Activities
 
Since 2002, the Business has implemented a strategy of vertical product integration, by growing its weighing systems business and by promoting its sophisticated electronic weighing modules and other products that integrate the precision measurement components designed and produced by the Business.
 
In pricing an acquisition, the Business focuses primarily on the target’s revenues and customer base, the strategic fit of the target’s product line with the Business’s existing product offerings (particularly how the target’s products fit into the Business’s vertical product integration strategy), opportunities for cost-cutting and integration with the Business’s existing operations and production, and other post-acquisition synergies, rather than on the target’s assets, such as its property, equipment, and inventory. As a result, the fair value of the acquired assets may correspond to a relatively smaller portion of the acquisition price, with the Business recording a substantial amount of goodwill related to the acquisition (see Note 5).
 
Year ended December 31, 2008
 
The Business made two acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Acquisition of Partner’s Interest in India Joint Venture
 
On June 30, 2008, in the Business’s fiscal third quarter, the Business acquired its partner’s interest in a joint venture in India. Vishay Intertechnology previously owned 49% of this entity, which is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of transducers. The entity has been renamed Vishay Transducers India, Ltd.
 
As a non-controlled investment, Vishay Transducers India, Ltd. had been accounted for using the equity basis. Effective June 30, 2008, the Business began reporting this entity as a consolidated subsidiary, included in the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment. The Business recognized revenues of $340,000 and $760,000 during the period ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively, on sales to this affiliate prior to acquiring control of this entity. The Business made purchases of $1,500,000 and $3,150,000 during the period ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively, from this affiliate prior to acquiring control of this entity.
 
The acquisition has been accounted for as a step-acquisition in accordance with then-applicable U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the cost to acquire the partner’s 51% interest has been allocated on a pro rata basis to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, with the excess being allocated to goodwill, as follows (in thousands) :
 
Working capital $ 219
Property and equipment 495
Trade names 125
Completed technology 58
Non-competition agreements 5,000
Customer relationships 317
Other assets (liabilities), net        (1,850 )
Pro rata share of identifiable assets $ 4,364
 
Purchase price including direct costs of acquisition
       and net of cash acquired $ 9,598
Goodwill $ 5,234  
 

The intangible assets associated with this transaction are being amortized over weighted-average useful lives of 10 years.
 
F-19
 


Note 4 – Acquisition and Divestiture Activities (continued)
 
The goodwill associated with this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill associated with this transaction was subsequently written off as part of the goodwill impairment charges recorded in 2008 (see Note 5).
 
Acquisition of Powertron GmbH
 
On July 23, 2008, the Business acquired Powertron GmbH, a manufacturer of specialty precision resistors. For financial reporting purposes, the results of operations for Powertron have been included in the Foil Technology Products segment from July 23, 2008.
 
The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated as follows, to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, with the excess being allocated to goodwill (in thousands) :
 
Working capital $ (302 )
Property and equipment 474
Trade names 59
Completed technology 110
Non-competition agreements 3,500
Customer relationships 903
Other assets (liabilities), net 37
Total identifiable assets $ 4,781
 
Purchase price including direct costs of acquisition
       and net of cash acquired $        14,674
Goodwill $ 9,893
 

The non-competition agreements, trade names, completed technology, and customer relationships are being amortized over weighted-average useful lives of 5 years, 7 years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively.
 
The goodwill associated with this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill associated with this transaction was subsequently written off as part of the goodwill impairment charges recorded in 2008 (see Note 5).
 
F-20
 


Note 4 – Acquisition and Divestiture Activities (continued)
 
Year ended December 31, 2007
 
Acquisition of PM Group PLC and Sale of its Electrical Contracting Business
 
On April 19, 2007, the Business declared its cash tender offer for all shares of PM Group PLC wholly unconditional, and assumed ownership of PM Group. PM Group is an advanced designer and manufacturer of systems used in the weighing and process control industries located in the United Kingdom. The aggregate cash paid for all shares of PM Group was approximately $45.7 million. The transaction was funded using cash on-hand.
 
Concurrent with the completion of the transaction, Vishay Intertechnology sold PM Group’s electrical contracting business for approximately $16.1 million. No gain or loss was recognized on the sale of the electrical contracting business.
 
The results of operations of PM Group are included in the results of the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment from April 19, 2007.
 
The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated as follows, to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, with the excess being allocated to goodwill (in thousands) :
 
Working capital      $ 783
Property and equipment 7,138
Trade names 663
Completed technology 1,726
Non-competition agreements 296
Customer relationships 1,706
Other assets (liabilities), net (517 )
Restructuring liabilities (311 )
Assets held for sale 16,098
Total identifiable assets $ 27,582
 
Purchase price including direct costs of acquisition
       and net of cash acquired $ 46,809
Goodwill $      19,227
 

The completed technology, non-competition agreements, and customer relationships are being amortized over weighted-average useful lives of 20 years, 7 years, and 5 years, respectively.
 
The goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill associated with this transaction was subsequently written off as part of the goodwill impairment charges recorded in 2008 (see Note 5).
 
F-21
 


Note 4 – Acquisition and Divestiture Activities (continued)
 
As part of its acquisition of PM Group in 2007, the Business transferred certain manufacturing operations from Bradford, United Kingdom to the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan). The costs associated with these transfers totaled $311,000 and were included in the cost of acquisition of PM Group under then-applicable accounting standards. Substantially all of these restructuring costs were paid during 2007.
 
Pro Forma Results
 
The unaudited pro forma results would have been as follows, assuming the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of each period presented (in thousands):
 
     Years ended December 31,
2008      2007
Pro forma net revenues $       245,313 $       254,807
Pro forma net earnings attributable to Parent $ (74,128 ) $ 26,831
 

The pro forma information reflects adjustments to depreciation based on the fair value of property and equipment acquired, adjustments to amortization based on the fair value of intangible assets, and related tax effects, as well as the inclusion of Vishay Transducers India, Ltd. in the combined and consolidated financial statements as a wholly owned subsidiary rather than an equity-method investment.
 
The unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been attained had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented.
 
F-22
 


Note 5 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of the net assets acquired at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but rather tested for impairment at least annually. The Business performs its annual impairment test as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. These impairment tests must be performed more frequently if there are triggering events.
 
ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other , prescribes a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. In the first step, the Business determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares that fair value to the net book value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis (an income approach) and a comparable companies market multiple approach.
 
To measure the amount of the impairment, ASC 350 prescribes that the Business determine the implied fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if the Business had acquired those reporting units. Specifically, the Business must allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets of that unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a hypothetical calculation that would yield the implied fair value of goodwill. The impairment loss is measured as the difference between the book value of the goodwill and the implied fair value of the goodwill computed in step two.
 
Vishay Intertechnology evaluated the goodwill associated with the Business as a separate reporting unit for ASC 350 evaluation purposes. For the purposes of the combined and consolidated financial statements presented on a stand-alone basis, the Business has evaluated its goodwill using its operating segments, namely, Foil Technology Products and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, as its reporting units.
 
In light of a sustained decline in market capitalization for Vishay Intertechnology and its peer group companies, and other factors, Vishay Intertechnology determined that an interim impairment test was necessary as of the end of the second, third, and fourth fiscal quarters of 2008.
 
Based on Vishay Intertechnology’s interim impairment tests performed as of the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008, the Business performed retrospective goodwill impairment tests for its reporting units as of the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008.
 
After completing step one of the impairment tests as of June 28, 2008 and as of September 27, 2008, the Business determined that the estimated fair value of its reporting units were greater than the book values of those units, and accordingly, no second step was required as of those dates.
 
Given the further deterioration of market conditions in the fourth quarter of 2008, an additional impairment test was performed as of December 31, 2008 (the end of the fourth fiscal quarter). After completing step one of the impairment test as of December 31, 2008, the Business determined that the estimated fair value of each of its reporting units was less than the net book values of those reporting units. This required the completion of the second step of the impairment evaluation. Upon completion of the step two analysis, the Business recorded impairment charges. Subsequent to recording these impairment charges, there was no remaining goodwill recorded on the combined and consolidated balance sheet.
 
F-23
 


Note 5 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
 
The determination of the fair value of the reporting units and the allocation of that value to individual assets and liabilities within those reporting units requires the Business to make significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to: the selection of appropriate comparable companies; control premiums appropriate for acquisitions in the industries in which the Business competes; the discount rate; terminal growth rates; and forecasts of revenue, operating income, depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures. The allocation requires several analyses to determine fair value of assets and liabilities including, among others, completed technology, trade names, in-process research and development, customer relationships, and certain property and equipment (valued at replacement costs).
 
Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual financial results could differ from those estimates. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial results or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting unit or the amount of the goodwill impairment charge.
 
The goodwill impairment charge is noncash in nature and does not affect the Business’s liquidity, cash flows from operating activities, and will not have a material impact on future operations.
 
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Foil Technology Weighing Modules
     Products      & Control Systems      Total
Balance at January 1, 2007 $ 4,181 $ 61,590 $ 65,771
Goodwill acquired during the year - 19,227 19,227
Currency translation adjustments 255 763 1,018
Balance at December 31, 2007 4,436 81,580 86,016
Goodwill acquired during the year 9,893 5,234   15,127
Impairment charges                (13,199 )                     (80,266 )      (93,465 )
Currency translation adjustments (1,130 ) (6,548 ) (7,678 )
Balance at December 31, 2008 $ - $ - $ -
 

F-24
 


Note 5 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
 
Other intangible assets were as follows (in thousands) :
 
December 31,
     2009      2008
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization
       (Definite-lived):
              Patents and acquired technology $ 4,074 $ 3,909
              Customer relationships 6,638 6,506
              Trade names 1,960 1,920
              Non-competition agreements 14,904 14,707
27,576 27,042
       Accumulated amortization:
              Patents and acquired technology (2,198 ) (1,547 )
              Customer relationships (2,670 ) (1,882 )
              Trade names (964 ) (714 )
              Non-competition agreements (4,527 ) (2,736 )
     (10,359 ) (6,879 )
       Net Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization $ 17,217   $      20,163
 

Amortization expense was $3,019,000, $2,441,000, and $1,667,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
Estimated annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows (in thousands) :
 
2010      $      3,049
2011   3,036
2012   2,841
2013 2,289
2014 1,847

As part of certain acquisitions, the Business entered into non-competition agreements with certain employees, former employees, and owners of acquired companies. Some payments under these agreements are made over the noncompetition period. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Business had liabilities of $2,298,000 and $3,014,000, respectively, pursuant to these agreements.
 
F-25
 


Note 6 – Restructuring and Severance Costs
 
Restructuring and severance costs reflect the cost reduction programs implemented by the Business. These include the closing of facilities and the termination of employees. Restructuring and severance costs include one-time exit costs, severance benefits pursuant to an on-going benefit arrangement recognized and related pension curtailment and settlement charges recognized . Restructuring costs are expensed during the period in which the Business determines it will incur those costs and all requirements of accrual are met. Because these costs are recorded based upon estimates, actual expenditures for the restructuring activities may differ from the initially recorded costs. If the initial estimates are too low or too high, the Business could be required either to record additional expenses in future periods or to reverse part of the previously recorded charges. Asset write-downs are principally related to buildings and equipment that will not be used subsequent to the completion of restructuring plans presently being implemented, and cannot be sold for amounts in excess of carrying value.
 
The following table summarizes our restructuring programs during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
     2009      2008      2007
Response to global recession $ 2,048 $ 644 $ -
Closure of Breda, the Netherlands facility - 5,705 -
Downsizing of City of Industry, California facility - - 247
Miscellaneous other - - 109
Total restructuring expense $      2,048 $      6,349 $      356
 

Restructuring Programs in Response to Global Economic Recession
 
In response to the economic downturn during the latter half of 2008 and 2009, the Business undertook significant measures to cut costs. This included a strict adaptation of manufacturing capacity to sellable volume and limiting the building of product for inventory. The Business incurred employee termination costs covering technical, production, administrative, and support employees located in nearly every country in which the Business operates.
 
The following table summarizes activity to date related to restructuring programs in response to the global economic recession (in thousands, except for number of employees):
 
Employees
Severance Other to be
     Costs      Exit Costs      Total      Terminated
Restructuring and severance costs $ 616 $ 28 $ 644 170
Utilized (479 ) (28 ) (507 ) (70 )
Foreign currency translation (2 ) - (2 ) -
Balance at December 31, 2008 $ 135 $ - $ 135 100
Restructuring and severance costs 1,602 446 2,048 199
Utilized      (1,696 )      (330 )      (2,026 )             (299 )
Foreign currency translation (41 ) 16 (25 ) -
Balance at December 31, 2009 $ - $ 132 $ 132 -
 

F-26
 


Note 6 – Restructuring and Severance Costs (continued)
 
Most of the accrued restructuring liability, included in other accrued expenses, is expected to be paid by December 31, 2010. The payment terms related to these restructuring programs varies, usually based on local customs and laws. Most severance amounts are paid in a lump sum at termination, while some payments are structured to be paid in installments.
 
Closure of Breda, the Netherlands Facility
 
During 2008, we announced the closure of our load cell manufacturing facility in Breda, the Netherlands, and transferred all manufacturing operations to Israel.
 
The following table summarizes activity to date related to the closure of the Breda (in thousands, except for number of employees):
 
Employees
Severance Other to be
     Costs      Exit Costs      Total      Terminated
Restructuring and severance costs $ 5,524 $ 181 $ 5,705 42
Utilized (3,820 )        (133 ) (3,953 )                (40 )
Foreign currency translation (432 ) (2 ) (434 ) -
Balance at December 31, 2008 $ 1,272 $ 46 $ 1,318 2
Utilized      (1,272 ) (46 )      (1,318 ) (2 )
Foreign currency translation - - - -
Balance at December 31, 2009 $ - $ - $ - -
 

City of Industry, California Facility Downsizing
 
During 2007, the Business transferred significant load cell manufacturing operations from our City of Industry, California facility to existing facilities in the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and Israel. The Business incurred $247,000 of restructuring and severance costs associated with this program, substantially all of which was paid during 2007.
 
F-27
 


Note 7 – Income Taxes
 
Income taxes for the Business as presented in these combined and consolidated financial statements are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although the Business’s operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S. federal and certain state tax returns, and United Kingdom “group relief,” available to entities under common control, has been claimed. Vishay Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, tax results as presented for the Business in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of future performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
Certain dedicated entities have taxes payable to the local taxing authorities, but the Business does not maintain taxes payable to/from parent in those jurisdictions where the taxable incomes are combined or offset. Accordingly, the Business is deemed to settle the annual current tax balances immediately with the legal tax-paying entities in the respective jurisdictions. These settlements are reflected as changes in parent net investment on the combined and consolidated balance sheets.
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and non-controlling interests consists of the following components (in thousands) :
 
Years ended December 31,
     2009      2008      2007
Domestic $ 6,365 $ (7,474 ) $ 7,245
Foreign 413 (60,952 ) 29,387
$      6,778 $      (68,426 ) $      36,632
 

Significant components of income taxes are as follows (in thousands) :
 
Years ended December 31,
     2009      2008      2007
Current:
       Federal $ 837 $ 3,027 $ 1,389
       State and local 320 692 448
       Foreign 3,761 5,132 6,212
4,918 8,851 8,049
Deferred:
       Federal 950 (1,433 ) 953
       State and local 183 (259 ) 150
       Foreign (994 ) (1,470 ) (323 )
139      (3,162 ) 780
Total income tax expense $      5,057   $ 5,689   $      8,829
 

F-28
 


Note 7 – Income Taxes (continued)
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Business’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands) :
 
December 31,
     2009      2008
Deferred tax assets:
       Pension and other retiree obligations $ 2,950 $ 2,907
       Inventories 3,201 3,258
       Net operating loss carryforwards 7,154 4,679
       Tax credit carryforwards 102 -
       Other accruals and reserves 2,068 3,727
              Total gross deferred tax assets 15,475 14,571
              Less valuation allowance (7,002 ) (4,288 )
8,473 10,283
Deferred tax liabilities:
       Tax over book depreciation 903 1,664
       Intangible assets other than goodwill 5,042 5,203
       Other - net 15 1,218
       Total gross deferred tax liabilities 5,960 8,085
 
       Net deferred tax assets $      2,513   $      2,198
 

The Business makes significant judgments regarding the realizability of its deferred tax assets (principally net operating losses). In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the carrying value of the net deferred tax asset is based on the Business’s assessment that it is more likely than not that the Business will realize these assets after consideration of all available positive and negative evidence.
 
A reconciliation of income tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to actual income tax provision is as follows (in thousands) :
 
Years ended December 31,
     2009      2008      2007
Tax at statutory rate $      2,372 $      (23,949 ) $      12,821
State income taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit 214 454 287
Effect of foreign operations 2,307 (2,332 ) (4,269 )
Goodwill impairment - 31,797 -
Other 164 (281 ) (10 )
Total income tax expense $ 5,057 $ 5,689   $ 8,829  
 

F-29
 


Note 7 – Income Taxes (continued)
 
At December 31, 2009, the Business had the following significant net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes (in thousands) :
 
          Expires
Belgium $ 1,350 No expiration
Israel      15,649 No expiration
Japan 3,208 2010-2016
Netherlands 3,651 No expiration
UK 3,775 No expiration

At December 31, 2009, no provision has been made for U.S. federal and state income taxes on approximately $81.7 million of foreign earnings, which the Business expects to be reinvested outside of the United States indefinitely. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Business would be subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits), state income taxes, incremental foreign income taxes, and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.
 
Income taxes paid, net of amounts refunded, were $2,690,000, $11,693,000, and $8,182,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. In taxing jurisdictions where the Business was previously included in a consolidated tax return with Vishay Intertechnology, the amount of income taxes paid includes amounts deemed to be paid to the legal tax-paying entities in the respective jurisdictions.
 
The Business and its subsidiaries are, or will be, subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Business establishes reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves are established when the Business believes that certain positions might be challenged despite its belief that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Business adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances and the provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there are no reserves because the Business has been fully indemnified by Vishay Intertechnology.
 
F-30
 


Note 8 – Indebtedness
 
Net Payable to Affiliates
 
The net amount payable to Vishay Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined scope of the Business primarily reflects balances carried forward from funding provided by Vishay Intertechnology to make certain acquisitions, to retire certain debt assumed in acquisitions, or as part of Vishay Intertechnology’s global working capital allocation strategy.
 
As further described in Note 3, throughout the period covered by the combined and consolidated financial statements, the Business had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. The net payable to affiliates also includes the effects of these transactions.
 
Effective as of the spin-off, the Business will utilize a portion of the cash on hand that was generated by the Business to repay this intercompany debt with Vishay Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined scope of the Business. Accordingly, at December 31, 2009, the net payable to affiliates is presented as a current liability. At December 31, 2008, the net payable to affiliates is presented as a noncurrent liability.
 
The combined and consolidated financial statements include charges for interest based on the prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility, or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities. Interest expense on the net amount payable to affiliates was $1,168,000, $1,517,000, and $2,106,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. Of these amounts, $500,000, $900,000, and $1,500,000 were not historically charged by Vishay Intertechnology to the Business, and accordingly, these amounts of imputed interest are reflected as an increase to parent net investment on the combined and consolidated balance sheet. The remaining interest expense was charged to the Business and paid in accordance with local statutory requirements.
 
Third-party Debt
 
Long-term debt payable to third parties consists of debt held by the Business’s Japanese subsidiary.
 
Annual maturities of third-party debt are as follows (in thousands):
 
2010      $      184
2011   -
2012   -
2013 776
2014 129
Thereafter 646

Interest paid on third-party debt during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was not material.
 
Credit Lines
 
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, certain subsidiaries of the Business had committed and uncommitted short-term credit lines with various foreign banks aggregating approximately $2,000,000. The outstanding balances related to these arrangements is presented as “notes payable to banks” on the combined and consolidated balance sheet.
 
The Business expects to enter into a revolving credit facility with a consortium of banks to provide it with flexibility and additional liquidity shortly after the separation.
 
F-31
 


Note 8 – Indebtedness (continued)
 
Exchangeable Notes of Vishay Intertechnology
 
On December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or principal) amount of its floating rate unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102 in connection with an acquisition.  The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay Intertechnology on December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of December 13, 2002.  The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange for shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called by Vishay Intertechnology for similar consideration.
 
Under the terms of the put and call agreement, by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is required to take action so that the existing notes are deemed exchanged as of the date of the spin-off, for a combination of new notes of Vishay Intertechnology and notes issued by Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
 
Except for Vishay Intertechnology’s contractual obligation to issue new notes of any spin-off company, these notes have no direct historical connection to the Business.  Accordingly, these exchangeable notes are not included in the historical combined and consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, the exact amount of the liability to be assumed by Vishay Precision Group, Inc. under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.
 
Note 9 – Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
The cumulative balance of each component of other comprehensive income (loss) and the income tax effects allocated to each component are as follows (in thousands) :
 
Beginning Before-Tax Tax Net-of-Tax Ending
     Balance      Amount      Effect      Amount      Balance
December 31, 2007
Pension and other
       postretirement actuarial items $ (1,348 ) $ 782 $ (233 ) $ 549 $ (799 )
Reclassification adjustment for
       recognition of actuarial items 133 (48 ) 85 85
Currency translation adjustment (134 ) 2,201 - 2,201 2,067
$ (1,482 ) $ 3,116 $ (281 ) $ 2,835 $ 1,353
 
December 31, 2008
Pension and other
       postretirement actuarial items $ (714 ) $ 55 $ (29 ) $ 26 $ (688 )
Reclassification adjustment for
       recognition of actuarial items (11 ) 4 (7 ) (7 )
Currency translation adjustment 2,067 (14,568 ) - (14,568 ) (12,501 )
$ 1,353 $      (14,524 ) $ (25 ) $      (14,549 ) $      (13,196 )
 
December 31, 2009
Pension and other
       postretirement actuarial items $ (695 ) $ (897 ) $      353 $ (544 ) $ (1,239 )
Reclassification adjustment for
       recognition of actuarial items 76 (27 ) 49 49
Currency translation adjustment (12,501 ) 4,523 - 4,523 (7,978 )
$      (13,196 ) $ 3,702 $ 326 $ 4,028 $ (9,168 )
 

Other comprehensive income (loss) includes the Business’s proportionate share of other comprehensive income (loss) of nonconsolidated subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method.
 
F-32
 


Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
 
Defined Benefit Plans
 
Employees of the Business participate in various defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
 
Certain subsidiaries that comprise the Business offer defined benefit pension plans to their employees, which are reflected in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Certain employees of the Business in the United States and the United Kingdom have historically participated in defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology. The annual cost of the Vishay Intertechnology defined benefit plans is allocated to all of the participating businesses based upon a specific actuarial computation, and accordingly, are reflected in the accompanying combined and consolidated statements of operations.
 
The Business will assume most of the obligations for employees in the United States and the United Kingdom that will be employed by the Business after the spin-off, and accordingly, those obligations are included in the Business’s combined and consolidated balance sheets. An allocation of plan assets is also reflected in the disclosures below.
 
Vishay Intertechnology’s principal qualified U.S. pension plan, the Vishay Intertechnology Retirement Plan (“VRP”), was frozen effective January 1, 2009. Due to the freeze of the VRP, participants no longer accrue benefits. Given the frozen nature of the VRP, participants who will become employees of the Business after the spin-off will become terminated, vested participants of the VRP as of the spin-off date and Vishay Intertechnology will retain the pension obligations, the amount of which is not material.
 
Employees who participated in the Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan will be transferred into the newly created Vishay Precision Group Nonqualified Retirement Plan. The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was a contributory pension plan designed to provide similar defined benefits to covered U.S. employees whose benefits under the Vishay Intertechnology Retirement Plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2009, and participants no longer accrue benefits.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan, like all nonqualified plans, is considered to be unfunded. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified trust, referred to as a “rabbi” trust, to fund benefits under this plan. Rabbi trust assets are subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not the property of employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent assets. Vishay Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly created rabbi trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance sheets include allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $1,220,000 and $1,069,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which equals the pension liability at those dates.
 
F-33
 


Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (continued)
 
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the benefit obligation, plan assets, and funded status related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
     Plans      Plans      Plans      Plans
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 11,508 $ 2,106 $ 18,284 $ 2,046
Service cost (adjusted for actual
       employee contributions) 253 34 471 34
Interest cost 639 135 817 126
Acquisitions - - 81 -
Contributions by participants 61 - 72 -
Actuarial (gains) losses 1,269 247 (2,354 ) 44
Benefits paid (326 ) (169 ) (2,320 ) (144 )
Currency translation 954 - (3,543 ) -
Benefit obligation at end of year $      14,358 $ 2,353 $      11,508 $ 2,106
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning
       of year $ 6,640 $ - $ 10,419 $ -
Actual return on plan assets 991 - (1,992 ) -
Acquisitions - - 38 -
Company contributions 684 - 2,753 -
Contributions by participants 61 - 72 -
Benefits paid (326 ) - (2,320 ) -
Currency translation 624 - (2,330 ) -
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 8,674 $ - $ 6,640 $ -
Funded status at end of year $ (5,684 ) $      (2,353 ) $ (4,868 ) $      (2,106 )
 

F-34
 


Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (continued)
 
Amounts recognized in the combined and consolidated balance sheet consist of the following (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans
Accrued benefit liability $      (5,684 ) $      (2,353 ) $      (4,868 ) $      (2,106 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 1,444 380 843 161
$ (4,240 ) $ (1,973 ) $ (4,025 ) $ (1,945 )

Actuarial items consist of the following (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans
Unrecognized net actuarial loss $      1,444 $      298 $      843 $      52
Unamortized transition obligation - 82 - 109
$ 1,444 $ 380 $ 843 $ 161
 

The following table sets forth additional information regarding the projected and accumulated benefit obligations for the pension plans (in thousands):
 
December 31,
        2009         2008
Accumulated benefit obligation, all plans $      13,575 $      10,860
 
Plans for which the accumulated benefit
       obligation exceeds plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation $ 14,240 $ 11,377
Accumulated benefit obligation 13,516 10,812
Fair value of plan assets 8,575 6,564

F-35
 


Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (continued)
 
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic cost of pension and other postretirement benefit plans (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans
Annual service cost $      314 $      34 $      543 $      34 $      564 $      40
Less employee
       contributions 61 - 72 - 78 -
Net service cost 253 34 471 34 486 40
Interest cost 639 135 817 126 878 112
Expected return on
       plan assets (424 ) - (643 ) - (625 ) -
Amortization of actuarial
       losses (gains) 50 27 (39 ) 27 95 38
Curtailment and settlement
       losses (gains) - - - - (56 ) -
Net periodic benefit cost $ 518 $ 196 $ 606 $ 187 $ 778 $ 190
  
See Note 9 for the pretax, tax effect, and after tax amounts included in other comprehensive income during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. The estimated actuarial items that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic pension cost during 2010 approximate the amounts amortized in 2009.
 
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 of the respective years:
 
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans
Discount rate 5.70% 5.75% 5.84% 6.25%  
Rate of compensation increase 3.24%   0.00%   2.66%   0.00%  

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the net periodic pension costs for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
 
Years ended December 31,
2009 2008
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans
Discount rate 5.84% 6.25% 5.55% 6.25%  
Rate of compensation increase 2.66%   0.00%   2.92%   0.00%  
Expected return on plan assets 5.88%   0.00%   6.39%   0.00%  

The impact of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the net periodic benefit cost and postretirement benefit obligation is not material.
 
F-36
 


Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (continued)
 
The plan’s expected return on assets is based on management’s expectation of long-term average rates of return to be achieved by the underlying investment portfolios. In establishing this assumption, management considers historical and expected returns for the asset classes in which the plans are invested, advice from pension consultants and investment advisors, and current economic and capital market conditions.
 
The investment mix between equity securities and fixed income securities is based upon achieving a desired return, balancing higher return, more volatile equity securities, and lower return, less volatile fixed income securities.
 
Plan assets are comprised of:
 
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Pension OPEB Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans         Plans         Plans
Equity securities 41 % - 59 % -
Fixed income securities 32 % - 25 % -
Cash and cash equivalents 27 % - 16 % -
Total 100 % - 100 % -
  
Estimated future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands):
 
Pension OPEB
        Plans         Plans
2010 $      221 $      169
2011 289 169
2012 403 169
2013 444 169
2014 581 169
2015-2019 3,676 845

The Business anticipates making contributions to its pension and postretirement benefit plans of approximately $700,000 during 2010.
 
F-37
 


Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (continued)
 
Other Retirement Obligations
 
The Business participates in various other defined contribution and government-mandated retirement plans based on local law or custom. The Business periodically makes required contributions for certain of these plans. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the combined and consolidated balance sheets include $2,512,000 and $2,934,000, respectively, within accrued pension and other postretirement costs related to these plans.
 
Most of the Business’s U.S. employees are eligible to participate in 401(k) savings plans which provide company matching under various formulas. Concurrent with the freezing of U.S. pension benefits effective January 1, 2009, the company-match percentage for affected employees was increased. The Business’s matching expense for the plans was $744,000, $604,000, and $649,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. No material amounts are included in the combined and consolidated balance sheets related to unfunded 401(k) contributions.
 
Certain key employees participate in a deferred compensation plan sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology. These employees will be transferred to a newly created deferred compensation plan of the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets include a liability within other noncurrent liabilities related to these deferrals. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified trust, referred to as a “rabbi” trust, to fund payments under this plan. Rabbi trust assets are subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not the property of employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent assets. Vishay Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly created rabbi trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance sheets include allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $2,295,000 and $1,912,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Assets held in trust are intended to approximate the Business’s liability under this plan.
 
F-38
 


Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation
 
Vishay Intertechnology maintains various stockholder-approved programs which allow for the grant of share-based compensation to officers, directors, and employees, including employees of the Business. The following disclosures represent the portion of the Vishay Intertechnology programs in which employees of the Business participated.
 
Vishay Intertechnology common stock underlies all awards granted under these programs. Accordingly, the amounts presented are not necessarily indicative of future performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would have experienced as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
Outstanding Vishay Intertechnology equity awards held by employees of the Business generally will expire at or within 60 days of the spin-off. The Business expects to issue replacement awards based on its own common stock after the spin-off.
 
The amount of compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Business determines compensation cost for restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and phantom stock units based on the grant-date fair value of the underlying common stock. Compensation cost is recognized over the period that the participant provides service in exchange for the award.
 
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense recognized (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
        2009         2008         2007
Vishay stock options $      65 $      66 $      76
Vishay restricted stock units 51 - -
Vishay phantom stock units 19 57 69
Total $ 135 $ 123 $ 145
 
F-39
 


Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation (continued)
 
Stock Options
 
The following table summarizes Vishay Intertechnology stock option activity of the Business’s employees (number of options in thousands) :
 
Years ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007
        Number
of
Vishay
Options
        Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
        Number
of
Vishay
Options
        Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
        Number
of
Vishay
Options
        Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding:
Beginning of year 171 $      18.26 170 $      18.22 214 $      14.72
Granted - - 6 8.98 25 14.25
Exercised - - (5 ) 5.60 (69 ) 5.92
Cancelled (69 ) 15.33 - - - -
End of year 102 $ 20.24 171 $ 18.26 170 $ 18.22
 
Vested and
       expected to vest 102 171 170
 
Exercisable:
End of year 79 141 140
  
Most of the options outstanding at January 1, 2007 were granted in 1998, 1999, and 2000. These options vested over a six-year period.
 
The following table summarizes information concerning stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009 (number of options in thousands) :
 
Ranges of
Exercise Prices         Outstanding         Exercisable
$8.98 6 1
$13.46 - $16.46 37 19
$25.13 59 59
Total 102 79
 
F-40
 


Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation (continued)
 
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no options granted in 2009. Options granted in 2008 and 2007 had a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $5.04 and $8.27, respectively. The following weighted-average assumptions were incorporated into the model used to value the options granted in 2008 and 2007:
 
2008 2007
        Grants         Grants
Expected dividend yield 0.0 % 0.0 %
Risk-free interest rate 3.6 % 4.7 %
Expected volatility 58.3 % 60.7 %
Expected life (in years) 7.2 7.2

The expected life of the options was estimated based on historical experience for a group of employees similar to the respective grantees. The expected volatility was estimated based on historical volatility over a period equal to the expected life of the options.
 
The pretax aggregate intrinsic value (the difference between the closing stock price of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the last trading day of 2009 of $8.35 per share and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2009 is zero, because all outstanding options have exercise prices in excess of market value. This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock. No options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, was $4,000 and $783,000, respectively.
 
Restricted Stock Units and Phantom Stock Units
 
Vishay Intertechnology RSUs granted to employees of the Business totaled 10,000 in 2009. At December 31, 2009, 6,668 of these RSUs are unvested.
 
Vishay Intertechnology phantom stock units granted to employees of the Business totaled 5,000 in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. At December 31, 2009, employees of the Business hold 30,000 phantom stock units, which will be converted into Vishay Intertechnology common stock upon completion of the spin-off.
 
F-41
 


Note 12 – Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
 
Leases
 
The Business uses various leased facilities and equipment in its operations. In the normal course of business, operating leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases. Certain operating leases include escalation clauses.
 
Total rental expense under operating leases was $3,624,000, $3,851,000, and $3,413,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
Future minimum lease payments for operating leases with initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands) :
 
2010         $      2,339
2011 1,617
2012 1,033
2013 133
2014 88
Thereafter -

Litigation
 
The Business is a party to various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The Business is of the opinion that these litigations or claims will not have a material negative effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
Executive Employment Agreements
 
Vishay Intertechnology has employment agreements with certain of its senior executives who will transfer to the Business. These employment agreements provide incremental compensation in the event of termination. Vishay Intertechnology does not provide any severance or other benefits specifically upon a change in control.
 
Sources of Supplies
 
Although most materials incorporated in the Business’s products are available from a number of sources, certain materials are available only from a relatively limited number of suppliers.
 
Some of the most highly specialized materials for the Business’s sensors are sourced from a single vendor. The Business maintains a safety stock inventory of critical materials, and has entered into consignment arrangements with certain vendors to assure the availability of critical materials at its facilities.
 
Certain metals used in the manufacture of our products are traded on active markets, and can be subject to significant price volatility.
 
Purchase Commitments
 
The Business has various purchase commitments incidental to the ordinary conduct of business. Such commitments are at prices which are not in excess of current market prices.
 
F-42
 


Note 12 – Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations (continued)
 
Market Concentrations
 
No single customer comprises greater than 10% of net revenues.
 
The vast majority of the Business’s products are used in the broad industrial market, with selected uses in military/aerospace, automotive, and to much lesser extent, consumer products. Within the industrial segment, the Business’s products serve wide applications in the waste management, bulk hauling, logging, scale, engineering systems, pharmaceutical, oil, chemical, steel, paper, and food industries.
 
Credit Risk Concentrations
 
Financial instruments with potential credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and notes receivable. The Business maintains cash and cash equivalents with various major financial institutions. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are generally limited due to the Business’s large number of customers and their dispersion across many countries and industries. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Business had no significant concentrations of credit risk.
 
Geographic Concentration
 
The Business has significant manufacturing operations in Israel in order to benefit from that country’s various tax abatement programs, lower wage rates, highly skilled labor force, and government-sponsored grants. Israeli incentive programs have contributed substantially to the growth and profitability of the Business. The Business might be materially and adversely affected if these incentive programs were no longer available to the Business or if events were to occur in the Middle East that materially interfered with the Business’s operations in Israel.
 
 
Warranty and Other Indemnification Obligations
 
The Business provides a limited warranty to its customers. The nature of the warranty is generally in the form of replacement of a defective product, although the Business periodically receives claims that arise from consequential damages which result from a customer’s installation of an allegedly defective component manufactured by the Business into the customer’s product. Although not covered by its stated warranty, the Business may occasionally reimburse the customer for these consequential damages. Annual warranty expenses and related obligations were not material to the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
Except for the warranty and related obligations described above, the Business has no other indemnification obligations to its customers.
 
F-43
 


Note 13 – Segment and Geographic Data
 
The Business operates in two product segments: Foil Technology Products, which include foil resistors and strain gages, and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, which include load cells, instruments, and complete systems for process control or on-board weighing applications.
 
The Business evaluates operating segment performance on operating income, exclusive of certain items. Management believes that evaluating segment performance excluding items such as restructuring and severance costs, goodwill impairment charges, and other items is meaningful because it provides insight with respect to intrinsic operating results of the Business. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). Operating segment assets are the owned or allocated assets used by each segment. Products are transferred between segments on a basis intended to reflect, as nearly as practicable, the market value of the products.
 
The following table sets forth operating segment information (in thousands) :
 
Weighing Modules Foil Technology Corporate/
        & Control Systems         Products         Other         Total
2009
Net third-party revenues $      100,120 $      71,871 $      - $      171,991
Intersegment revenues - 1,235 (1,235 ) -
Gross margin 22,282 30,423 - 52,705
Segment operating income (loss) 4,066 18,444 (15,209 ) 7,301
Restructuring and severance costs 1,854 194 - 2,048
Depreciation expense 4,721 3,725 - 8,446
Capital expenditures 1,386 795 - 2,181
Total assets 115,187 94,592 - 209,779
 
2008
Net third-party revenues $ 148,796 $ 92,904 $ - $ 241,700
Intersegment revenues - 3,057 (3,057 ) -
Gross margin 37,304 42,592 - 79,896
Segment operating income (loss) 12,821 27,749 (112,202 ) (71,632 )
Restructuring and severance costs 6,251 98 - 6,349
Impairment of goodwill 80,266 13,199 - 93,465
Depreciation expense 5,060 3,350 - 8,410
Capital expenditures 4,093 3,298 - 7,391
Total assets 153,491 101,372 - 254,863
 
2007
Net third-party revenues $ 144,736 $ 94,300 $ - $ 239,036
Intersegment revenues - 1,463 (1,463 ) -
Gross margin 38,297 46,214 - 84,511
Segment operating income (loss) 15,397 32,399 (11,658 ) 36,138
Restructuring and severance costs 248 108 - 356
Depreciation expense 4,541 3,589 - 8,130
Capital expenditures 4,739 3,590 - 8,329
Total assets 229,017 90,964 - 319,981

F-44
 


Note 13 – Segment and Geographic Data (continued)
 
The “Corporate/Other” column for segment operating income (loss) includes unallocated selling, general, and administrative expenses and certain items which management excludes from segment results when evaluating segment performance, as follows (in thousands):
 
Years ended December 31,
        2009         2008         2007
Unallocated selling, general, and administrative expenses $      (13,161 ) $      (12,388 ) $      (11,302 )
Restructuring and severance costs (2,048 ) (6,349 ) (356 )
Impairment of goodwill - (93,465 ) -
$ (15,209 ) $ (112,202 ) $ (11,658 )
  
The following geographic data include net revenues based on revenues generated by subsidiaries located within that geographic area and property and equipment based on physical location (in thousands) :
 
Net Revenues
 
Years ended December 31,
        2009         2008         2007
United States $      58,795 $      80,449 $      88,989
United Kingdom 26,568 40,851 39,922
Other Europe 51,454 73,038 67,968
Israel 17,899 23,898 22,003
Asia 17,275 23,464 20,154
$ 171,991 $ 241,700 $ 239,036
  
Property and Equipment - Net
 
December 31,
        2009         2008
United States $      5,124 $      6,214
United Kingdom 6,434 6,267
Other Europe 1,026 1,309
Israel 17,162 18,908
Asia 14,715 17,883
Other 138 122
$ 44,599 $ 50,703
 
F-45
 


Note 14 – Additional Financial Statement Information
 
The caption “Other” on the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following (in thousands) :
 
Years ended December 31,
        2009         2008         2007
Foreign exchange gain (loss) $      122 $      2,470 $      872
Interest income 725 1,902 1,550
Income recognized on the equity method - 444 489
Other (133 ) (36 ) (123 )
$ 714 $ 4,780 $ 2,788
 
Net inventories consist of the following (in thousands ) :
 
December 31,
        2009         2008
Raw materials $      13,341 $      15,584
Work in process 13,214 17,519
Finished goods 17,247 24,889
$ 43,802 $ 57,992
  
Net property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands ) :
 
December 31,
        2009         2008
Land $      2,003 $      2,448
Buildings and improvements 38,486 37,425
Machinery and equipment 64,681 63,305
Software 3,607 3,504
Projects in process 338 1,297
Accumulated depreciation (64,516 )   (57,276 )
$ 44,599 $ 50,703
 
Other accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands ) :
 
December 31,
        2009         2008
Restructuring $      132 $      1,453
Goods received, not yet invoiced 877 1,190
Other 3,564 4,277
$ 4,573 $ 6,920
 
F-46
 


Note 15 – Fair Value Measurements
 
The Business adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008, and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
 
ASC Topic 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy of the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
 
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
 
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the Business’s own assumptions.
 
An asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The following table provides the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands) :
 
Fair value measurements at reporting date using:
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
        Fair Value         Inputs         Inputs         Inputs
Assets held in rabbi trusts $      3,515 $      955 $      2,560 $      -
 
Defined benefit pension plan assets
       Equity securities $ 3,561 $ 3,561 $ - $ -
       Fixed income securities 2,748 2,748 - -
       Cash and cash equivalents 2,365 2,365 - -

Vishay Intertechnology maintains nonqualified trusts, referred to as “rabbi” trusts, to fund payments under deferred compensation and nonqualified pension plans, and the Business will establish similar trusts to continue these programs. Vishay Intertechnology will contribute assets to the Business’s rabbi trust prior to the spin-off in an amount that approximates the Business’s liability under these arrangements. The assets above are based on a pro rata allocation of the Vishay Intertechnology rabbi trust assets, but the actual assets transferred may differ. Rabbi trust assets consist primarily of marketable securities, classified as available-for-sale and company-owned life insurance assets. The marketable securities held in the rabbi trusts are valued using quoted market prices on the last business day of the year. The company-owned life insurance assets are valued in consultation with Vishay Intertechnology’s insurance brokers using the value of underlying assets of the insurance contracts. The fair value measurement of the marketable securities held in the rabbi trust is considered a Level 1 measurement and the measurement of the company-owned life insurance assets is considered a Level 2 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.
 
F-47
 


Note 15 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)
 
The Business maintains defined benefit retirement plans in certain of its subsidiaries. The assets of the plans are measured at fair value.
 
Equity securities held by the defined benefit retirement plans consist of equity securities that are valued based on quoted market prices on the last business day of the year. The fair value measurement of the equity securities is considered a Level 1 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.
 
Fixed income securities held by the defined benefit retirement plans consist of government bonds and corporate notes that are valued based on quoted market prices on the last business day of the year. The fair value measurement of the fixed income securities is considered a Level 1 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.
 
Cash held by the defined benefit retirement plans consists of deposits on account in various financial institutions. The carrying amount of the cash approximates its fair value.
 
The Business’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, long-term notes receivable, short-term notes payable, accounts payable, and long-term debt. The carrying amounts for these financial instruments reported in the combined and consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair values.
 
F-48
 


Unaudited interim combined and consolidated financial statements
      as of April 3, 2010 and for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
 
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets F-51
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations F-52
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-53
Combined and Consolidated Statement of Equity F-54
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements F-55

F-49
 


This page intentionally left blank.
 
F-50
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
 
April 3, December 31,
2010 2009
(unaudited)      
Assets
Current assets:
       Cash and cash equivalents $ 80,421 $ 63,192
       Accounts receivable, net 25,212 23,345
       Net inventories 45,010 43,802
       Deferred income taxes   4,984 4,960
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets 5,333     4,522
Total current assets 160,960 139,821  
 
Property and equipment, net 44,236 44,599
Intangible assets, net 16,244 17,217
Other assets 8,440 8,142
       Total assets $ 229,880 $ 209,779
 
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
       Notes payable to banks $ - $ 9
       Trade accounts payable 6,942 5,805
       Net payable to affiliates 33,443 18,495
       Payroll and related expenses 7,082 6,619
       Other accrued expenses 6,119 4,573
       Income taxes 1,286 1,647
       Current portion of long-term debt 96 184
Total current liabilities 54,968 37,332
 
Long-term debt, less current portion 1,525 1,551
Deferred income taxes 5,985 5,993
Other liabilities 6,347 6,141
Accrued pension and other postretirement costs 10,442 10,549
Total liabilities 79,267 61,566
 
Commitments and contingencies
 
Equity:
       Parent net investment 162,710 157,258
       Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (12,231 ) (9,168 )
       Total Parent equity 150,479 148,090
Noncontrolling interests 134 123
Total equity 150,613 148,213
Total liabilities and equity $        229,880 $        209,779  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-51
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited - In thousands)
 
Fiscal quarters ended
April 3, March 28,
2010       2009
Net revenues $        48,175 $        43,705
Costs of products sold 31,127 29,654
Gross profit 17,048 14,051
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses 13,207 11,024
Restructuring and severance costs - 479  
Operating income 3,841 2,548
 
Other income (expense):
       Interest expense   (207 ) (377 )
       Other (4 )   176
              Other income (expense) - net (211 ) (201 )
 
Income before taxes 3,630 2,347
 
Income tax expense 1,827 1,751
 
Net earnings 1,803 596
Less: net earnings attributable to
              noncontrolling interests 27 7
Net earnings attributable to Parent $ 1,776 $ 589
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-52
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited - In thousands)
 
Three fiscal months ended
April 3, March 28,
2010       2009
Operating activities  
Net earnings $ 1,803 $ 596
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
       net cash provided by operating activities:
       Depreciation and amortization 2,541       2,807
       (Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment (3 )     19
       Inventory write-offs for obsolescence 519       427
       Other 2,104       (623 )
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities,
       net of effects of businesses acquired:
       Accounts receivable (2,549 )     4,566
       Inventories (2,170 )     (1,121 )
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (844 )     538
       Accounts payable 1,275       (1,948 )
       Other current liabilities 2,181       (209 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,857       5,052
 
Investing activities
Capital expenditures (1,915 )     (831 )
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 121       28
Net cash used in investing activities (1,794 )     (803 )
 
Financing activities
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases (114 )     (247 )
Net changes in short-term borrowings (9 )     (134 )
Distributions to non-controlling interests (16 )     (16 )
Transactions with Vishay Intertechnology 16,023       355
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 15,884       (42 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1,718 )     (1,301 )
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 17,229       2,906
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 63,192       70,381
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $        80,421     $        73,287
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-53
 


VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Combined and Consolidated Statement of Equity
(Unaudited - In thousands)
 
Accumulated
Parent Other Total
Net   Comprehensive   Parent   Noncontrolling   Total
Investment       Income (Loss)       Equity       Interests       Equity
Balance at December 31, 2009 $ 157,258   $ (9,168 )   $ 148,090     $ 123     $ 148,213
Net earnings   1,776     -       1,776       27       1,803
Foreign currency translation adjustment   -     (3,119 )     (3,119 )     -       (3,119 )
Pension and other        
       postretirement actuarial items -     56       56       -       56
Comprehensive income (loss)   (1,287 )     27       (1,260 )
Other transactions with Vishay - net 3,618     -       3,618       -       3,618
Stock compensation expense 58     -       58       -       58
Distributions to noncontrolling interests -     -       -       (16 )     (16 )
Balance at April 3, 2010 $        162,710 $        (12,231 ) $        150,479 $        134 $        150,613
 
See accompanying notes.
 
F-54
 


Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
 
Background
 
On October 27, 2009, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (“Vishay Intertechnology”) announced that it intends to spin off its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses into an independent, publicly traded company to be named Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (the “Business”). The spin-off is expected to take the form of a tax-free stock dividend to Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders.
 
The Business is an international designer, manufacturer and marketer of Foil Technology Products (strain gages, ultra-precision foil resistors, current sensors) and Weighing Modules and Control Systems (load cells/transducers, instruments, weighing modules, and control systems) for a wide variety of applications.
 
Carve-out Basis of Presentation
 
The Business is currently part of Vishay Intertechnology and its assets and liabilities consist of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses.
 
The Business is conducted by various direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology. In this context, no direct ownership relationship existed among the various units comprising the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements have been derived from Vishay Intertechnology’s historical accounting records and are presented on a carve-out basis.
 
Before effecting the spin-off, all assets and liabilities associated with the Business will be contributed to Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
 
The combined and consolidated statement of operations includes all revenues and expenses directly attributable to the Business, including costs for facilities, functions, and services used by the Business at shared sites and costs for certain functions and services performed by centralized Vishay Intertechnology organizations outside of the defined scope of the Business and directly charged to the Business based on usage. The results of operations also include allocations of (i) costs for administrative functions and services performed on behalf of the Business by centralized staff groups within Vishay Intertechnology, (ii) Vishay Intertechnology general corporate expenses, (iii) pension and other postemployment benefit costs, (iv) interest expense, and (v) current and deferred income taxes. See Notes 2, 4, 6, and 10 for a description of the allocation methodologies utilized.
 
All of the allocations and estimates in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements are based on assumptions that Vishay Intertechnology management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. However, these allocations and estimates are not necessarily indicative of the costs and expenses that would have resulted if the Business had been operated as a separate entity.
 
All of the allocations and estimates in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements are based on assumptions that Vishay Intertechnology management believes are reasonable, and reasonably approximate the historical costs that the Business would have incurred as a separate entity for the same level of service or support. However, these allocations and estimates are not necessarily indicative of the costs and expenses that would have resulted if the Business had been operated as a separate entity.

Following the spin-off, the Business will incur incremental costs to both replace Vishay Intertechnology support and to allow the Business to function as an independent, publicly-traded company.

Actual costs that may have been incurred if the Business had been a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or performed by employees, and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure. Following the spin-off, the Business will perform these functions using its own resources or purchases these services.
 
F-55
 


Note 1 – Basis of Presentation (continued)
 
Interim Financial Statements
 
These unaudited combined and consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for the presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The information furnished reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair summary of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the combined and consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, included elsewhere in this information statement. The results of operations for the three fiscal months ended April 3, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
 
The Business reports interim financial information for 13-week periods beginning on a Sunday and ending on a Saturday, except for the first quarter, which always begins on January 1, and the fourth quarter, which always ends on December 31. The four fiscal quarters in 2010 end on April 3, 2010; July 3, 2010; October 2, 2010; and December 31, 2010, respectively. The four fiscal quarters in 2009 ended on March 28, 2009; June 27, 2009; September 26, 2009; and December 31, 2009; respectively.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) updated the accounting guidance related to fair value measurements disclosures. The updated guidance (i) requires separate disclosure of significant transfers out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements, (ii) requires disclosure of Level 3 fair value measurements activity on a gross basis, (iii) clarifies existing disaggregation requirements, and (iv) clarifies existing input and valuation technique disclosure requirements. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods after December 15, 2009, except for the Level 3 fair value measurement disclosure requirements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Business adopted the aspects of the guidance that are currently effective as of January 1, 2010 and will adopt the remaining guidance on January 1, 2011. The adoption of the effective guidance had no effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity and the adoption of the remaining guidance is not expected to have any effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
 
F-56
 


Note 2 – Related Party Transactions
 
Throughout the periods covered by the combined and consolidated financial statements, the Business had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. While these transactions are not necessarily indicative of the terms the Business would have achieved had the Business been a separate entity, management believes they are reasonable.
 
Historically, the Business has used the corporate services of Vishay Intertechnology for a variety of functions including treasury, tax, legal, internal audit, human resources, and risk management. After the spin-off, the Business will be an independent, publicly traded company. The Business expects to incur additional costs associated with being an independent, publicly traded company. These additional anticipated costs are not reflected in its historical combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Sales Organizations
 
A portion of the Business’s Foil Technology products are sold by the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization, which operates as regionally-based legal entities. The third-party sale of these products is presented in the combined and consolidated financial statements as if it were made by the Business, although legal entities outside of the defined scope of the Business actually made these sales. Third-party sales made through the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization totaled $3,618,000 and $3,530,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
 
The selling entities receive selling commissions on these sales. Commission rates are set at the beginning of each year based on budgeted selling expenses expected to be incurred by the Vishay Intertechnology sales organization. Commission expense charged to the Business by the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales organization was $234,000 and $154,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
 
The net cash generated by these transactions is retained by the Vishay Intertechnology selling entity, and is presented in the combined and consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in parent net investment, and is presented in the combined and consolidated statements of cash flows as a financing activity in the caption “Transactions with Vishay Intertechnology.”
 
These sales activities will be transitioned to the Business’s dedicated sales forces shortly after the spin-off.
 
Shared Facilities
 
The Business and operations of Vishay Intertechnology outside the defined scope of the Business share certain manufacturing and administrative sites. Costs are allocated based on relative usage of the respective facilities.
 
Following the spin-off, the Business and Vishay Intertechnology will continue to share certain manufacturing locations. The Business will own one location in Israel and one location in Japan, and will lease space to Vishay Intertechnology. Vishay Intertechnology will own one location in Israel and one location in the United States and lease space to the Business.
 
F-57
 


Note 2 – Related Party Transactions (continued)
 
Administrative Service Sharing Agreements
 
The combined and consolidated financial statements include transactions with other Vishay Intertechnology operations involving administrative services (including expenses primarily related to personnel, insurance, logistics, other overhead functions, corporate IT support, and network communications support) that were provided to the Business by Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. Amounts charged to the Business for these services were $403,000 and $633,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
 
The Business will be required to assume the responsibility for these functions, either internally or from third-party vendors, following the spin-off. Under the terms of a transition services agreement that the Business expects to enter into with Vishay Intertechnology prior to the consummation of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will provide to the Business, for a fee, specified support services for a period of 18 months after the spin-off.
 
Allocated Corporate Overhead Costs
 
The costs of certain services that are provided by the Vishay Intertechnology corporate office to the Business have been reflected in the combined and consolidated financial statements, including charges for services such as accounting matters for all SEC filings, investor relations, tax services, cash management, legal services, and risk management on a global basis. These allocated costs are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined and consolidated statements of operations, and are presented in the combined and consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in parent net investment.
 
The total amount of allocated costs was $560,000 and $491,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively. These costs were allocated on the ratio of Business revenues to total revenues and represent management’s reasonable allocation of the costs incurred. However, these amounts are not representative of the costs necessary for the Business to operate as an independent, publicly traded company.
 
F-58
 


Note 2 – Related Party Transactions (continued)
 
Centralized Cash Management
 
Vishay Intertechnology uses a centralized approach to cash management in the United States and Europe.
 
In the United States, cash deposits from the Business historically were transferred to Vishay Intertechnology on a regular basis and were netted against intercompany payables, or occasionally remitted to the parent as a dividend. See “Net Payable to Affiliates” below.
 
The Business’s subsidiaries in Europe historically participated in a formal cash pooling agreement, with Vishay Europe GmbH, an affiliate company, acting as the cash pool leader, effectively serving as a bank for these subsidiaries. Each day, the individual participant entity can either deposit funds into the cash pool account from the collection of receivables or withdraw funds from the account to fund working capital or other cash needs of the participant entity. At the end of the day, the cash pool leader sweeps all cash balances into the cash pool leader’s account, or funds any overdrawn accounts so that each cash pool participant account has a zero balance at the end of the day. The individual entity has discretion over the use of its cash, and accordingly, the combined and consolidated financial statements classify the cash pool balances as “cash and cash equivalents.” The Business’s subsidiaries have withdrawn from the European cash pool as of December 31, 2009.
 
Vishay Europe GmbH, as cash pool leader, pays interest on these funds based on the prevailing interest rates at third-party lending institutions in Europe. The combined and consolidated financial statements reflect cash pool interest income of $90,000 for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009.
 
Net Payable to Affiliates
 
The net amount payable to Vishay Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined scope of the Business primarily reflects balances carried forward from funding provided by Vishay Intertechnology to make certain acquisitions, to retire certain debt assumed in acquisitions, or as part of Vishay Intertechnology’s global working capital allocation strategy.
 
As further described above, throughout the period covered by the combined and consolidated financial statements, the Business had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. The net payable to affiliates also includes the effects of these transactions.
 
Effective as of the spin-off, the Business will utilize a portion of the cash on hand that was generated by the Business to repay this intercompany debt with Vishay Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined scope of the Business. Accordingly, at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the net payable to affiliates is presented as a current liability.
 
The combined and consolidated financial statements include charges for interest based on the prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility, or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities. Interest expense on the net amount payable to affiliates was $183,000 and $355,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively. Of these amounts, $100,000 and $300,000 were not historically charged by Vishay Intertechnology to the Business, and accordingly, these amounts of imputed interest are reflected as an increase to parent net investment on the combined and consolidated balance sheet. The remaining interest expense was charged to the Business and paid in accordance with local statutory requirements.
 
F-59
 


Note 2 – Related Party Transactions (continued)
 
Exchangeable Notes of Vishay Intertechnology
 
On December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or principal) amount of its floating rate unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102 in connection with an acquisition. The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay Intertechnology on December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of December 13, 2002. The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange for shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called by Vishay Intertechnology for similar consideration.
 
Under the terms of the put and call agreement, by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is required to take action so that the existing notes are deemed exchanged as of the date of the spin-off, for a combination of new notes of Vishay Intertechnology and notes issued by Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
 
Except for Vishay Intertechnology’s contractual obligation to issue new notes of any spin-off company, these notes have no direct historical connection to the Business. Accordingly, these exchangeable notes are not included in the historical combined and consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, the exact amount of the liability to be assumed by Vishay Precision Group, Inc. under the exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.
 
F-60
 


Note 3 – Restructuring and Severance Costs
 
Restructuring and severance costs reflect the cost reduction programs implemented by the Business. These include the closing of facilities and the termination of employees. Restructuring and severance costs include one-time exit costs, severance benefits pursuant to an on-going benefit arrangement recognized and related pension curtailment and settlement charges recognized . Restructuring costs are expensed during the period in which the Business determines it will incur those costs and all requirements of accrual are met. Because these costs are recorded based upon estimates, actual expenditures for the restructuring activities may differ from the initially recorded costs. If the initial estimates are too low or too high, the Business could be required either to record additional expenses in future periods or to reverse part of the previously recorded charges. Asset write-downs are principally related to buildings and equipment that will not be used subsequent to the completion of restructuring plans presently being implemented, and cannot be sold for amounts in excess of carrying value.
 
Restructuring Programs in Response to Global Economic Recession
 
In response to the economic downturn during the latter half of 2008 and 2009, the Business undertook significant measures to cut costs. This included a strict adaptation of manufacturing capacity to sellable volume and limiting the building of product for inventory. The Business incurred employee termination costs covering technical, production, administrative, and support employees located in nearly every country in which the Business operates.
 
The Business recorded restructuring and severance costs of $479,000 for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009.
 
No new restructuring activities were initiated during the first quarter of 2010.
 
F-61
 


Note 4 – Income Taxes
 
Income taxes for the Business as presented in these combined and consolidated financial statements are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although the Business’s operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S. federal and certain state tax returns, and United Kingdom “group relief,” available to entities under common control, has been claimed. Vishay Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, tax results as presented for the Business in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of future performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
Certain dedicated entities have taxes payable to the local taxing authorities, but the Business does not maintain taxes payable to/from parent in those jurisdictions where the taxable incomes are combined or offset. Accordingly, the Business is deemed to settle the annual current tax balances immediately with the legal tax-paying entities in the respective jurisdictions. These settlements are reflected as changes in parent net investment on the combined and consolidated balance sheets.
 
The provision for income taxes consists of provisions for federal, state, and foreign income taxes. The effective tax rates for the periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 reflect the Business’s expected tax rate on reported income before income tax and tax adjustments. The Business operates in an international environment with significant operations in various locations outside the United States. Accordingly, the consolidated income tax rate is a composite rate reflecting the Business’s earnings and the applicable tax rates in the various locations where the Business operates.
 
The Business and its subsidiaries are, or will be, subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Business establishes reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves are established when the Business believes that certain positions might be challenged despite its belief that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Business adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances and the provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. At April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there are no reserves because the Business has been fully indemnified by Vishay Intertechnology.
 
F-62
 


Note 5 – Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Comprehensive income (loss) includes the following components (in thousands) :
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010       March 28, 2009
Net earnings $ 1,803     $ 596
Other comprehensive income (loss):
       Foreign currency translation  
              adjustment (3,119 )     (2,560 )
       Pension and other postretirement
              adjustments   56       9  
Total other comprehensive income (loss)   (3,063 )     (2,551 )
Comprehensive income (loss) $ (1,260 )   $ (1,955 )
Less: Comprehensive income (loss)  
       attributable to noncontrolling interests 27       7
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable    
       to Vishay stockholders $        (1,287 )   $        (1,962 )
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes the Business’s proportionate share of other comprehensive income (loss) of nonconsolidated subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method.
 
F-63
 


Note 6 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
 
Defined Benefit Plans
 
Employees of the Business participate in various defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
 
Certain subsidiaries that comprise the Business offer defined benefit pension plans to their employees, which are reflected in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements.
 
Certain employees of the Business in the United States and the United Kingdom have historically participated in defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology. The annual cost of the Vishay Intertechnology defined benefit plans is allocated to all of the participating businesses based upon a specific actuarial computation, and accordingly, are reflected in the accompanying combined and consolidated statements of operations.
 
The Business will assume most of the obligations for employees in the United States and the United Kingdom that will be employed by the Business after the spin-off, and accordingly, those obligations are included in the Business’s combined and consolidated balance sheets. An allocation of plan assets is also reflected in the disclosures below.
 
Vishay Intertechnology’s principal qualified U.S. pension plan, the Vishay Intertechnology Retirement Plan (“VRP”), was frozen effective January 1, 2009. Due to the freeze of the VRP, participants no longer accrue benefits. Given the frozen nature of the VRP, participants who will become employees of the Business after the spin-off will become terminated, vested participants of the VRP as of the spin-off date and Vishay Intertechnology will retain the pension obligations, the amount of which is not material.
 
Employees who participated in the Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan will be transferred into the newly created Vishay Precision Group Nonqualified Retirement Plan. The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was a contributory pension plan designed to provide similar defined benefits to covered U.S. employees whose benefits under the Vishay Intertechnology Retirement Plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2009, and participants no longer accrue benefits.
 
The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan, like all nonqualified plans, is considered to be unfunded. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified trust, referred to as a “rabbi” trust, to fund benefits under this plan. Rabbi trust assets are subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not the property of employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent assets. Vishay Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly created rabbi trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance sheets include allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $1,238,000 and $1,220,000 at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which equals the pension liability at those dates.
 
F-64
 


Note 6 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (continued)
 
The following table shows the components of net periodic cost of pension and other postretirement benefit plans (in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended   Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010   March 28, 2009
Pension   OPEB   Pension   OPEB
Plans       Plans       Plans       Plans
Net service cost $ 63     $ 9   $ 63     $ 9
Interest cost   205       34     160       33
Expected return on plan assets        (129 )   -          (106 ) -
Amortization of actuarial losses   3       8     13       7
Net periodic benefit cost $ 142 $        51 $ 130 $        49
 
Other Retirement Obligations
 
Certain key employees participate in a deferred compensation plan sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology. These employees will be transferred to a newly created deferred compensation plan of the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets include a liability within other noncurrent liabilities related to these deferrals. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified trust, referred to as a “rabbi” trust, to fund payments under this plan. Rabbi trust assets are subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not the property of employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent assets. Vishay Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly created rabbi trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance sheets include allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $2,365,000 and $2,295,000 at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Assets held in trust are intended to approximate the Business’s liability under this plan.
 
F-65
 


Note 7 – Share-Based Compensation
 
Vishay Intertechnology maintains various stockholder-approved programs which allow for the grant of share-based compensation to officers, directors, and employees, including employees of the Business. The following disclosures represent the portion of the Vishay Intertechnology programs in which employees of the Business participated.
 
Vishay Intertechnology common stock underlies all awards granted under these programs. Accordingly, the amounts presented are not necessarily indicative of future performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would have experienced as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented.
 
Outstanding Vishay Intertechnology equity awards held by employees of the Business generally will expire at or within 60 days of the spin-off. The Business expects to issue replacement awards based on its own common stock after the spin-off.
 
The amount of compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Business determines compensation cost for restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and phantom stock units based on the grant-date fair value of the underlying common stock. Compensation cost is recognized over the period that the participant provides service in exchange for the award.
 
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense recognized (in thousands):
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010       March 28, 2009
Vishay stock options $ 10   $ 15
Vishay restricted stock units   4     -
Vishay phantom stock units   44     19
Total $        58 $        34
 
The following table summarizes Vishay Intertechnology stock option activity of the Business’s employees (number of options in thousands) :
 
Number   Weighted
of   Average
Vishay   Exercise
Options       Price
Outstanding:
Beginning of year        102   $ 20.24
Granted -     -
Exercised -     -
Cancelled -     -
End of period 102 $        20.24
 
Vested and
       expected to vest 102
 
Exercisable:
End of period 83  
  
F-66
 


Note 7 – Share-Based Compensation (continued)
 
The pretax aggregate intrinsic value (the difference between the closing stock price of Vishay Intertechnology common stock on the last trading day of first fiscal quarter of 2010 of $10.03 per share and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on April 3, 2010 is approximately $6,000. This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock. No options were exercised during the three fiscal months ended April 3, 2010.
 
Restricted Stock Units and Phantom Stock Units
 
At both April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, employees of the Business hold 6,668 unvested Vishay Intertechnology RSUs.
 
Vishay Intertechnology phantom stock units granted to employees of the Business totaled 5,000 during the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010. At April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, employees of the Business hold 35,000 and 30,000 phantom stock units, respectively, which will be converted into Vishay Intertechnology common stock upon completion of the spin-off.
 
F-67
 


Note 8 – Segment Information
 
The Business operates in two product segments: Foil Technology Products, which include foil resistors and strain gages, and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, which include load cells, instruments, and complete systems for process control or on-board weighing applications.
 
The Business evaluates operating segment performance on operating income, exclusive of certain items. Management believes that evaluating segment performance excluding items such as restructuring and severance costs, and other items is meaningful because it provides insight with respect to intrinsic operating results of the Business.
 
The following table sets forth operating segment information (in thousands) :
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3, 2010       March 28, 2009
Net third-party revenues:              
Weighing Modules & Control Systems $ 24,278     $ 24,437
Foil Technology Products   23,897       19,268  
       Total $ 48,175     $ 43,705
 
Gross margin:
Weighing Modules & Control Systems $ 5,116     $ 6,073
Foil Technology Products   11,932       7,978  
       Total $        17,048 $        14,051
 
Segment operating income:
Weighing Modules & Control Systems $ (158 )   $ 1,491
Foil Technology Products   8,236       4,823
Unallocated SG&A expenses   (4,237 )     (3,287 )
Restructuring and severance costs   -       (479 )
Consolidated operating income (loss) $ 3,841     $ 2,548
 
Restructuring and severance costs:              
Weighing Modules & Control Systems $ -     $ 304
Foil Technology Products   -       175  
  $ -     $ 479  
 
Products are transferred between segments on a basis intended to reflect, as nearly as practicable, the market value of the products. Intersegment sales from the Foil Technology Products segment to the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment were $394,000 and $345,000 for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
 
F-68
 


Note 9 – Additional Financial Statement Information
 
The caption “Other” on the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following (in thousands) :
 
Fiscal quarter ended
April 3,       March 28,
2010 2009
Foreign exchange gain $ 46     $ 4  
Interest income   91       179
Other   (141 )     (7 )
$ (4 )   $ 176
 
Net inventories consist of the following (in thousands ) :
   
April 3,   December 31,
2010   2009
Raw materials $ 12,581     $ 13,341
Work in process   13,332       13,214
Finished goods   19,097       17,247  
  $ 45,010     $ 43,802
  
Net property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands ) :
 
April 3,   December 31,
2010   2009
Land $ 1,941     $ 2,003
Buildings and improvements   38,091       38,486
Machinery and equipment   64,733       64,681  
Software   3,652       3,607
Projects in process   1,393       338
Accumulated depreciation        (65,574 )        (64,516 )
$ 44,236     $ 44,599
 
Other accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands ) :
  April 3,   December 31,
2010   2009
Restructuring $ 75     $ 132
Goods received, not yet invoiced   1,365       877
Other   4,679       3,564
$ 6,119     $ 4,573
 

F-69
 


Note 10 – Fair Value Measurements
 
ASC Topic 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy of the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
 
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
 
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the Business’s own assumptions.
 
An asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The following table provides the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis (in thousands) :
 
Fair value measurements at reporting date using:
Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3
Fair Value       Inputs       Inputs       Inputs
April 3, 2010    
Assets held in rabbi trusts $ 3,603   $ 937   $ 2,666   $ -
 
December 31, 2009                
Assets held in rabbi trusts $        3,515 $        955   $        2,560 $        -

Vishay Intertechnology maintains nonqualified trusts, referred to as “rabbi” trusts, to fund payments under deferred compensation and nonqualified pension plans, and the Business will establish similar trusts to continue these programs. Vishay Intertechnology will contribute assets to the Business’s rabbi trust prior to the spin-off in an amount that approximates the Business’s liability under these arrangements. The assets above are based on a pro rata allocation of the Vishay Intertechnology rabbi trust assets, but the actual assets transferred may differ. Rabbi trust assets consist primarily of marketable securities, classified as available-for-sale and company-owned life insurance assets. The marketable securities held in the rabbi trusts are valued using quoted market prices on the last business day of the year. The company-owned life insurance assets are valued in consultation with Vishay Intertechnology’s insurance brokers using the value of underlying assets of the insurance contracts. The fair value measurement of the marketable securities held in the rabbi trust is considered a Level 1 measurement and the measurement of the company-owned life insurance assets is considered a Level 2 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.
 
The Business’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, long-term notes receivable, short-term notes payable, accounts payable, and long-term debt. The carrying amounts for these financial instruments reported in the combined and consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair values.
 
F-70