Our product portfolio is focused to
a significant extent on specialty products that require us to form a tied
cooperation between us and our customers. We expect to continue to use our
research and development, engineering, and product marketing resources to roll
out new and innovative products. Our ability to react to changing customer
needs and industry trends will continue to be key to our success. Our
design, research, and product development teams, in partnership with our
marketing teams, drive our efforts to bring innovations to market. We
intend to leverage our insights into customer demand to continually develop and
roll out new innovative products within our existing lines and to modify our
existing core products in ways that make them more appealing, addressing
changing customer needs and industry trends.
Many of our products
and manufacturing techniques, technologies, and packaging methods have been
invented, designed, and developed by our engineers and scientists. We maintain
strategically placed design centers where proximity to customers enables us to
more easily gauge and satisfy the needs of local markets. These design centers
are located in the United States, Germany, Israel, the People
’
s Republic of
China, India, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Sweden, Japan, and the United
Kingdom.
We also maintain research and
development staff and promote programs at a number of our production facilities
to develop new products and new applications of existing products, and to
improve manufacturing techniques. This decentralized system encourages
individualized product development at specific manufacturing facilities that
occasionally has applications at other facilities.
In addition, our sales force
is comprised of individuals with an engineering background who can
help meet the needs of our customers for technical and applications support.
This in-depth knowledge of customer needs is a key factor in future research and
development initiatives.
- 90
-
Patents and Licenses
We have made a
significant investment in securing intellectual property protection for our
technology and products. We seek to protect our technology by, among other
things, filing patent applications for technology considered important to the
development of our business. Although we have numerous United States and foreign
patents covering certain of our products and manufacturing processes, no
particular patent is considered individually material to our business. We also
rely upon trade secrets, unpatented know-how, and continuing technological
innovation.
Our ability to
compete effectively with other companies depends, in part, on our ability to
maintain the proprietary nature of our technology. Although we have been
awarded, have filed applications for, or obtained numerous patents in the United
States and other countries, there can be no assurance concerning the degree of
protection afforded by these patents or the likelihood that pending patents will
be issued.
We require all of our
technical, research and development, sales and marketing, and management
employees and most consultants and other advisors to execute confidentiality
agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with
us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made
known to the entity or individual during the course of the entity’s or
individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed
to third parties except in specific circumstances. Substantially all of our
technical, research and development, sales and marketing, and management
employees have entered into agreements providing for the assignment to us of
rights to inventions made by them while employed by us.
We have observed that
in the current business environment, companies have become more aggressive in
asserting and defending patent claims against competitors. We will continue to
defend our intellectual property rights, and we may become party to disputes
regarding patent licensing. An unfavorable outcome regarding one of these
intellectual property matters could have a material adverse effect on our
business and operating results.
Environment, Health and Safety
Vishay
Intertechnology has, and we expect to adopt, an Environmental Health and Safety
Policy that commits us to achieve and maintain compliance with applicable
environmental laws, to promote proper management of hazardous materials for the
safety of our employees and the protection of the environment, and to minimize
the hazardous materials generated in the course of our operations. This policy
is expected to be implemented with accountability directly to the board of
directors. In addition, our manufacturing operations are subject to various
federal, state, and local laws restricting discharge of materials into the
environment.
While we attempt to identify
potential environmental concerns and to minimize, or obtain indemnification for,
environmental matters associated with our acquisitions, we often unavoidably
inherit pre-existing environmental obligations, generally based on successor
liability doctrines. At December 31, 2009, we are not aware of any
material unresolved environmental remediation obligations related to our
manufacturing sites, and we have no liabilities accrued for such matters.
Although we have never been involved in any environmental matter that has had a
material adverse impact on our overall operations, there can be no assurance
that in connection with any past or future acquisition we will not be obligated
to address environmental matters that could have a material adverse impact on
our operations.
Under the terms of
our master separation agreement with Vishay Intertechnology, each of we and
Vishay Intertechnology have agreed to indemnify the other in respect of
liabilities relating to its business, including environmental liability. See
“Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay
Intertechnology.”
- 91 -
We are not involved in any pending
or threatened proceedings that would require curtailment of our operations. We
continually expend funds to ensure that our facilities comply with applicable
environmental regulations. We believe that we are in compliance with applicable
environmental laws. However, we cannot accurately predict future developments
and do not necessarily have knowledge of all past occurrences on sites that we
currently occupy. More stringent environmental regulations may be enacted in the
future, and we cannot determine the modifications, if any, in our operations
that any such future regulations might require, or the cost of compliance with
such regulations. Moreover, the risk of environmental liability and remediation
costs is inherent in the nature of our business and, therefore, there can be no
assurance that material environmental costs, including remediation costs, will
not arise in the future.
Employees
As of December 31,
2009, we employed approximately 1,900 full-time employees, of whom approximately
88% were located outside the United States. In preparation for the spin-off,
certain employees of Vishay Intertechnology who have been instrumental in the
growth and development of our business have transferred to our company. Our
future success is substantially dependent on our ability to attract and retain
highly qualified technical and administrative personnel. Some of our employees
outside the United States are members of trade unions. Our relationship with our
employees is generally good. However, no assurance can be given that labor
unrest or strikes will not occur.
- 92 -
Properties
Our business has
approximately 17 manufacturing locations. Our manufacturing facilities include
owned locations, third-party leased locations, and locations leased from Vishay
Intertechnology (shared locations). The principal locations of our manufacturing
facilities, along with available space including administrative offices, are
listed below:
|
|
|
|
Approx. Available
|
|
|
Product segment
|
|
|
Space (Square
Feet)
|
Owned Locations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holon, Israel (a)
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
118,000
|
Wendell, North Carolina USA
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
106,000
|
Carmiel, Israel
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
90,000
|
Bradford, United Kingdom
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
86,000
|
Akita, Japan (b)
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
45,000
|
Chartres, France
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
11,000
|
Basingstoke, United Kingdom
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
11,000
|
Alajuela, Costa Rica
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
4,000
|
|
Third-Party Leased
Locations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beijing, People’s Republic of
China
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
46,000
|
Chennai, India
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
35,000
|
Degerfors, Sweden
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
30,000
|
Netanya, Israel
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
24,000
|
Tianjin, People’s Republic of
China
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
17,000
|
Taipei, Republic of China (Taiwan)
|
|
Weighing Modules and Control
Systems
|
|
8,000
|
Teltow, Germany
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
5,000
|
|
Locations Leased from
Vishay
|
|
|
|
|
Intertechnology (shared
locations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice, France
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
(c)
|
Be’er Sheva, Israel
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
14,000
|
(a)
|
|
Within
one year from the spin-off, all Vishay Intertechnology personnel and
property will be removed from the Holon facilities. Approximate available
space reported above assumes that the departure has occurred.
|
|
(b)
|
|
A
facility on the campus will be leased to Vishay Intertechnology after the
spin-off. Approximate available space reported above excludes the area to
be leased.
|
|
(c)
|
|
We
will own certain equipment at this facility, which will be consigned to
Vishay Intertechnology as a subcontractor manufacturing certain products
for us.
|
In the opinion of
management, our properties and equipment generally are in good operating
condition and are adequate for our present needs. We do not anticipate
difficulty in renewing leases as they expire or in finding alternative
facilities.
Our corporate
headquarters is located at 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355.
- 93 -
Legal Proceedings
From time to time we
are involved in routine litigation incidental to our business. Management
believes that such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, should not
have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers
The persons
identified in the following table, who will constitute our executive officers
following the spinoff, have been employees of Vishay Intertechnology. After the
spin-off, none of the executive officers will continue to be employees of Vishay
Intertechnology, and they will resign any executive officer positions held with
Vishay Intertechnology.
Name
|
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions to be held
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
43
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
William M. Clancy
|
|
47
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
Thomas P. Kieffer
|
|
57
|
|
Sr. Vice President – Chief Technical
Officer
|
Ziv Shoshani will be our Chief
Executive Officer and President, and will also serve on the board of directors.
Mr. Shoshani was Chief Operating Officer of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. from
January 1, 2007 to November 1, 2009. During 2006, he was Deputy Chief Operating
Officer. Mr. Shoshani has been Executive Vice President of Vishay
Intertechnology since 2000 with various areas of responsibility, including
Executive Vice President of the Capacitors and the Resistors businesses, as well
as heading the Measurements Group and Foil Divisions. Mr. Shoshani has been
employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1995 and has been a member of the
Vishay Intertechnology Board of Directors since 2001. Mr. Shoshani is a nephew
of Dr. Felix Zandman, the founder and executive chairman of Vishay
Intertechnology who is expected to control approximately 45% of the voting power
of our company following the spin-off.
William M. Clancy
will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Clancy was
Corporate Controller of Vishay Intertechnology from 1993 to November 1, 2009. He
became a Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology in 2001 and a Senior Vice
President of Vishay Intertechnology in 2005. Mr. Clancy also has served as
Corporate Secretary of Vishay Intertechnology since 2006 and was Assistant
Corporate Secretary of Vishay Intertechnology from 2002 to 2006. From June 16,
2000 until May 16, 2005 (the date Vishay Intertechnology acquired the
noncontrolling interest in Siliconix incorporated), Mr. Clancy served as the
principal accounting officer of Siliconix. Mr. Clancy has been employed by
Vishay Intertechnology since 1988.
Thomas P. Kieffer
will be our Senior Vice President – Chief Technical Officer. Mr. Kieffer was
promoted to the position of Senior Vice President – Corporate R&D for Vishay
Intertechnology’s Measurements Group and Foil Resistors Division on January 1,
2008. Prior to that, Mr. Kieffer was Senior Vice President of Vishay
Intertechnology’s Micro-Measurements and Load Cells Divisions. He became
Division Head of Vishay Intertechnology’s Measurements Group Division in 2000
and from 2002 through 2005 was involved in several acquisitions of measurements
businesses. Mr. Kieffer has been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1984.
- 94 -
Other Members of the Management Team
In addition to our
executive officers, we depend on certain key management employees who, as
employees of Vishay Intertechnology, were instrumental in the growth and
development of our business. Information about these important members of our
management team is set forth below.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions to be held
|
|
Dubi Zandman
|
58
|
|
Vice President – Systems
|
Rafi Uzan
|
44
|
|
Vice President – Load Cells
|
Yaron Kadim
|
45
|
|
Vice President – Foil
|
Steven Klausner
|
52
|
|
Vice President –
Treasurer
|
Dubi Zandman will be our Vice
President responsible for Systems division operations. He has held a similar
position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2004. During 2002, Mr. Dubi Zandman was
actively involved in five acquisitions for Vishay, which formed the new Vishay
Transducers business. He served as Senior Sales Director of the new group until
2004. From 2004 until 2006, he served as Vice President, leading the Vishay
Transducers division, and executed the acquisition of SI Technologies. Since
2006, Mr. Dubi Zandman served as Vice President – Division Head of Vishay
Systems, during which time he executed the acquisition of PM Group. Mr. Dubi
Zandman has been employed by Vishay since 2000, and has previously also served
as Director of Vishay Intertechnology’s Electro-Films division and Sales
Director of Vishay Measurements Group. Mr. Dubi Zandman is a cousin of Dr. Felix
Zandman.
Rafi Uzan will be our
Vice President responsible for Load Cells division operations. He has held a
similar position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2008. From 2004 to 2008, Mr.
Uzan was operations manager for Israel and for the Load Cells division within
Vishay Intertechnology. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Uzan served as VP Operations and
Operations Israel for Vishay Intertechnology’s Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitor
(“MLCC”) Division. He also held the position of Production Manager for Vishay
Intertechnology’s Inductors division from 1995 to 1998. Mr. Uzan has been
employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1994, where he started his career in
Vishay as a Process Engineer.
Yaron Kadim will be
our Vice President responsible for Foil Resistors operations. He has held a
similar position at Vishay Intertechnology since 2005. During 2004, he was
Deputy VP Precision Resistors Division Head. From 2000 until 2004, Mr. Kadim was
Director of R&D and Engineering in Vishay Intertechnology’s
Draloric/Beyschlag resistors division. In 1998, Mr. Kadim served as Engineering
Manager for Vishay Intertechnology’s plant in Be’er Sheva, Israel. From 1993
until 1998, Mr. Kadim served as the Production Manager of Vishay
Intertechnology’s tantalum capacitors plant in Dimona, Israel. Mr. Kadim has
been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1993.
Steven Klausner will
be our Vice President – Treasurer. He has held a similar position at Vishay
Intertechnology since 2007. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Klausner was Vice President –
Assistant Treasurer of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Klausner has been employed by
Vishay Intertechnology since 1992. Mr. Klausner is the brother-in-law of Marc
Zandman, who, following the spin-off will become the non-executive chairman of
our board of directors, and the son-in-law of Dr. Felix Zandman.
- 95 -
Board of Directors
Our board of
directors presently consists of Ziv Shoshani, William Clancy, and Dr. Lior
Yahalomi. For information concerning Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy, see “Executive
Officers” above. Dr. Yahalomi is the executive vice president and chief
financial officer of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Clancy and Dr. Yahalomi are
expected to resign from our board shortly before separation. The persons
identified in the following table are expected to serve on our board of
directors following the completion of the spin-off and will be elected to a
one-year term by Vishay Intertechnology as our sole stockholder shortly, with
the effective date of their election deferred until immediately following the
spin-off.
Name
|
|
Age
|
Marc Zandman
|
48
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
43
|
Samuel Broydo
|
73
|
Saul V. Reibstein
|
61
|
Timothy V. Talbert
|
63
|
Marc Zandman.
is expected to serve as the non-executive Chairman of our board of
directors. Mr. Marc Zandman has been Vice Chairman of the board of directors of
Vishay Intertechnology since 2003, a Director of Vishay Intertechnology since
2001, and President of Vishay Intertechnology Israel Ltd. since 1998. Mr. Marc
Zandman was appointed Chief Administration Officer of Vishay Intertechnology as
of January 1, 2007. Mr. Marc Zandman was Group Vice President of Vishay
Intertechnology Measurements Group from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Marc Zandman has
served in various other capacities with Vishay Intertechnology since 1984. He is
the son of Dr. Felix Zandman, the founder and executive chairman of Vishay
Intertechnology who is expected to control approximately 45% of the voting power
of our company following the spin-off. Mr. Marc Zandman’s dedicated service to
Vishay Intertechnology and extensive knowledge of our business give him valuable
experience facing issues relevant to our company.
Ziv Shoshani.
For biographical information concerning Mr. Shoshani, see “Executive
Officers.” Mr. Shoshani’s long-standing dedication to our company, exemplified
in his extensive management experience and experience on the Vishay
Intertechnology Board of Directors, provide him with valuable insight into the
business and the operation of our company making him a valuable advisor on the
Board.
Samuel Broydo.
In January 2004, Dr. Broydo retired as the Managing Director of
Technology at Applied Materials Inc., a leading manufacturer of semiconductor
manufacturing equipment. Prior to joining Applied Materials, he served as the
Vice President of Technology at ZyMOS Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer
that pioneered Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) design
methodology, from March 1984 to May 1990. Before Zymos, Dr. Broydo served as the
VLSI Technology Manager for the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, a computer
technology innovator, from August 1979 to September 1983. Dr. Broydo was also
the VLSI Technology Group Supervisor at Bell Telephone Laboratories (Bell Labs),
which was then a leading communications and electronics research company, from
May 1966 to August 1979. Dr. Broydo studied at the Leningrad Polytechnic
Institute and received Masters Degree in Electrical Engineering from Warsaw
Polytechnic Institute; he later earned a Ph.D in Electronics and Electrical
Engineering from the University of Birmingham, England. Dr. Broydo’s expertise
in electronics and semiconductor technology enables him to understand our
business and identify growth opportunities. Dr. Broydo also brings to our board
the benefit of relevant management and infrastructure experience in solid state
electronic research, design, engineering, manufacturing and problem solving.
- 96 -
Saul V. Reibstein
.
Since 2004, Mr.
Reibstein has served as a member of the senior management team of CBIZ, Inc., a
New York Stock Exchange-listed professional services company, where, as
Executive Managing Director, he manages nine business units in CBIZ’s Financial
Services Group and is responsible for acquisitions of accounting firms for CBIZ
on a national basis. Mr. Reibstein has over 35 years of public accounting
experience, including 11 years serving as a partner in BDO Seidman, a national
accounting services firm, where he was the partner in charge of the Philadelphia
office from June 1997 to December 2001 and Regional Business Line Leader from
December 2001 until September 2004. Mr. Reibstein is a licensed CPA in
Pennsylvania and received a Bachelor of Business Administration from Temple
University. Mr. Reibstein qualifies as an audit committee financial expert
satisfying the rules of the SEC. Mr. Reibstein’s qualification as an audit
committee financial expert as well as his extensive experience as a public
accounting partner make him highly qualified to serve both as a director of our
company and a financial expert on the Audit Committee. Mr. Reibstein also has
relevant, long-standing experience as a manager of an NYSE-listed company that
he will draw upon in advising us with respect to our listing and filing
compliance.
Timothy V. Talbert
. Mr. Talbert has served as Senior Vice President of Credit and
Originations for Lease Corporation of America (“LCA”), a national equipment
lessor, since July 2000, and President of the LCA Bank Corporation, a bank that
augments LCA’s funding capacity, since December 2004. Previously, Mr. Talbert
was Senior Vice President and Director of Asset Based Lending and Equipment
Leasing of Huntington National Bank from 1997 to 2000; and prior to that, served
in a variety of positions with Comerica Bank for more than 20 years. Mr. Talbert
previously served on the board of directors and was a member of the audit
committee of Siliconix incorporated, a NASDAQ-listed manufacturer of power
semiconductors of which Vishay Intertechnology owned an 80.4% interest, from
2001 until Vishay Intertechnology acquired the non-controlling interests in
2005. Mr. Talbert received a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from University of
the Pacific and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame. Mr. Talbert’s service
as a director and member of the audit and compensation committees of a publicly
traded company allows him to bring an important perspective to the Board.
Additionally, Mr. Talbert’s service as the president of a federally regulated
institution gives him relevant understanding of compliance with complex
regulations and current accounting rules adding invaluable expertise to our
Board.
All directors other than Mr. Marc
Zandman and Mr. Shoshani are expected to meet the New York Stock Exchange
listing standards for independence.
- 97 -
Committees of the Board of Directors
Effective upon the
separation, our board of directors will have three committees of independent
directors immediately: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of our committees will be
governed by a written charter, which will be approved by our board of
directors.
Audit Committee
The functions of the
Audit Committee will include overseeing our accounting and financial reporting
processes; overseeing the audits of our consolidated financial statements and
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; assisting
the board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independence and
qualifications of our independent registered public accounting firm, and the
performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public
accounting firm; and performing other related functions specified in the
Committee’s charter.
The Audit Committee
is expected to consist of Mr. Reibstein, Dr. Broydo, and Mr. Talbert, each of
whom satisfies the independence requirements of the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the governance listing requirements of the New York
Stock Exchange. All of the members of the Committee also satisfy the financial
literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and Mr. Reibstein, who is
expected to serve as the chairman of the Committee, qualifies as an audit
committee financial expert under the rules of the SEC.
Compensation Committee
The functions of the
Compensation Committee will include evaluating the performance of the Chief
Executive Officer and our other executive officers and, based on this
evaluation, determining and approving the compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer and our other executive officers; making recommendations to the board
with respect to compensation of directors; making recommendations to the board
with respect to, and administering, our incentive compensation plans and
equity-based plans; and performing other related functions specified in the
Committee’s charter. Also see “Executive Compensation.”
The Compensation
Committee is expected to consist of Dr. Broydo and Messrs. Reibstein and
Talbert. The Compensation Committee will select its chairman at its first
meeting. These directors will be “non-employee directors” within the meaning of
Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” within
the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The functions of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will include identifying
individuals qualified to become members of the board; selecting, or recommending
that the board of directors select, the director nominees for the next annual
meeting of stockholders; developing and recommending to the board a set of
corporate governance principles and a code of ethics for our company; overseeing
the evaluation of our board and management; administering our Related Party
Transactions Policy; and performing other related functions specified in the
Committee’s charter.
The chairman of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be designated under our
Corporate Governance Principles to preside at the executive sessions of the
board’s non-management directors.
The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee is expected to consist of Dr. Broydo and Messrs.
Reibstein and Talbert. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will
select its chairman at its first meeting.
- 98
-
Corporate Governance
General
Following the
spin-off, our day-to-day business activities will be carried out by our
employees under the direction and supervision of our Chief Executive Officer.
The board of directors will oversee these activities. In doing so, each director
is required to use business judgment in the best interests of our company and
its stockholders. The board’s primary responsibilities include:
-
Review of our performance,
strategies, and major decisions;
-
Oversight of our compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements and the integrity of our financial
statements;
-
Oversight of management, including
review of the CEO’s performance and succession planning for key management
roles; and
-
Oversight of compensation for the
CEO, key executives and the board, as well as oversight of compensation
policies and programs for all employees.
Additional
description of the board’s responsibilities will be included in our Corporate
Governance Principles document, described below.
Corporate Governance Principles
Our board of
directors is expected to adopt a set of Corporate Governance Principles in
connection with the spin-off to assist them in guiding our governance practices.
These practices will be regularly re-evaluated by the Nominating and Governance
Committee in light of changing circumstances in order to continue serving the
best interests of our company and our stockholders. The Corporate Governance
Principles document will be available to stockholders following the separation
on our website and in print upon request.
Codes of Conduct
To assure the honest
and ethical conduct of our employees and officers, our board of directors will
adopt the following codes of conduct, which will be posted on our website and
available to stockholders upon written request following the separation.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics will contain standards of ethical business practices
applicable to all our employees, including our officers. Among other things,
this code will address corporate records, conflicts of interest, gifts and
gratuities, corrupt practices, corporate opportunities, trading in company
securities, contacts with the media, compliance with law, proper business and
marketing practices, political contributions, discrimination and harassment,
government proceedings, communications with employees and procedures for dealing
with violations.
Code of Ethics
Our board will also
adopt a Code of Ethics Applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Controller and Financial
Managers. This code is intended to promote the honest and ethical conduct of
senior management; avoidance of conflicts of interest; full, fair, accurate,
timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with
the SEC and other public communications; compliance with laws; prompt internal
reporting of violations of the code; and accountability for adherence to the
code. We intend to post any amendments to or any waivers from a provision of
this code on our website.
- 99
-
Director Qualifications, Nominations and
Communications
We expect that our
board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will adopt policies
and procedures regarding director qualifications, nominations and communications
that will take effect once we are a public company. These policies will be
posted to our website and will be available to stockholders upon written request
following the separation.
Director qualifications
We expect that our
policy on director qualification will generally require that candidates for
director be persons of integrity and sound ethical character; be able to
represent all stockholders fairly; have no material conflicts of interest; have
demonstrated professional achievement; have meaningful management, advisory or
policy-making experience; have an appreciation of the major business issues
facing our company and the industry in which we operate; and have adequate time
to devote to service on our board. It will also require that our board have
directors who can satisfy the independence and financial literacy and expertise
standards required of us by the rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange
and that the benefits of board diversity be considered in the nominations
process.
Stockholder recommendations of director
nominees
We expect our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to adopt procedures regarding
stockholder recommendation of nominees for election to our board of directors.
Under these procedures the Committee will only consider candidates who satisfy
our minimum qualifications for directors, and will take into account other
factors, such as the size and duration of the recommending stockholder’s
ownership interest in our company. It is also expected that the Committee will
adopt a general policy to re-nominate qualified incumbent directors and that,
absent special circumstances, the Committee will not consider other candidates
when a qualified incumbent director consents to stand for
re-election.
Stockholder nominations of
director candidates and stockholder proposal
s
Stockholders may nominate
director candidates and make proposals to be considered at the annual meeting of
stockholders. As used in this section, the term “stockholder proposal” refers to
a proposal by a stockholder to be presented to stockholders for a vote at a
meeting of stockholders, not including a stockholder nomination of a candidate
for election to the board of directors.
In accordance with our bylaws, any stockholder nominations of one or more
candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting or any other proposal
for consideration at an annual meeting must be received by us at least 60 days
and not more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding annual
meeting of stockholders. The nomination or proposal must be accompanied by
certain information, including:
-
information concerning the
nominating or proposing stockholder, any beneficial owners of our company’s
securities held by the nominating or proposing stockholder, and each
nominee;
-
disclosure of any interest in our
company’s securities held by the nominating or proposing stockholder and any
such beneficial holder, including any long or short derivative or similar
positions relating to our company’s securities;
-
in the case of a nomination, a
description of any compensatory or other monetary relationships between
nominating stockholder and any such beneficial holder, on the one hand, and
each nominee, on the other hand; in the case of a proposal for business other
than a nomination, a brief description of the proposal and the reasons for
making the proposal at the meeting, as well as a description of all
agreements, arrangements and understandings between the proposing stockholder
and any beneficial owner, on the one hand, and any other person, on the other
hand, in connection with the proposal;
-
in the case of a nomination, any
additional information we may reasonably required in order to determine the
eligibility of the nominee to serve as an independent director or that could
be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence,
or lack thereof, of the nominee; and
-
information relating to the proposing or nominating stockholder and
beneficial owner, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy
statement or other filings required to be made in connection with
solicitations of proxies for the proposal and/or for the election of directors
in a contested election in accordance with the SEC’s proxy rules.
- 100
-
In addition, each
nominee is required to complete and submit a questionnaire to us with respect to
the background and qualification of the nominee and the background of any other
person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, together with a
written representation and agreement that the nominee (A) is not and will not
become a party to any agreement or understanding as to how the nominee, if
elected as a director, will act or vote on any issue or question that has not
been disclosed to us or that could limit or interfere with the nominee’s ability
to comply with his or her fiduciary duties as a director under applicable law,
(B) is not and will not become a party to any agreement or understanding with
anyone other than our company with respect to any direct or indirect
compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or
action as a director that has not been disclosed to us, and (C) would be in
compliance, if elected as a director, and will comply with all applicable
publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality
and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of our company.
In addition to being able to
present proposals for consideration at an annual meeting of stockholders,
stockholders may also be able to have their proposals included in our proxy
statement and form of proxy for an annual meeting. In order to have a
stockholder proposal included in the proxy statement and form of proxy, the
proposal must be delivered to us at the address set forth below not later than
120 days before the date of our company’s proxy statement released to
stockholders in connection with the preceding annual meeting of stockholders,
and the stockholder must otherwise comply with applicable SEC requirements. If
the stockholder complies with these requirements for inclusion of a proposal in
our proxy statement and form of proxy, the stockholder
’
s proposal will
not be excluded by virtue of failure to comply with the timing and
information requirements included in our bylaws, as described
above.
Communications with the Board
We also expect to
adopt procedures for security holder communications with directors and
interested party communication with non-management directors. Under these
procedures, our stockholders will be able to communicate with the board of
directors, any committee of the board or any individual director, and any
interested party will be able to communicate with the non-management directors
of the board as a group, by delivering communications either in writing
addressed to our corporate secretary at our headquarters address or by e-mail to
an address to be designated.
Other Policies and Procedures
We expect that our
board or its committees will adopt other policies and procedures as required by
law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or as appropriate to promote
good corporate governance. Among these are—
-
whistleblower and ethics hotline
procedures to be adopted by our Audit Committee for the receipt, retention and
treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and
auditing matters and to allow for the confidential, anonymous submission by
employees and others of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing
matters; and
-
a related party transaction
policy, which will govern transactions between our company and our directors
and executive officers and their families; stockholders owning in excess of 5%
of any class of our securities; and certain affiliates of these persons.
- 101
-
Director Compensation
Cash and Equity-Based Compensation
We intend to
compensate each non-employee director for service on the board with an annual
retainer fee. The amount of the annual retainer is expected to be $75,000 for
the non-executive chairman of the board and $30,000 for each other non-employee
director. In addition, we intend to provide each non-employee director with a
one-time grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for our company’s common
stock. The one-time grant would be made upon election to the board, and the RSUs
would vest ratably over three years. The RSU grant to the non-executive chairman
of the board will be valued at $75,000 and the RSU grant to each other
non-employee director will be valued at $30,000. The number of shares subject to
the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the award by the average of
the daily closing price of our common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days
following the distribution date.
No separate
compensation will be paid to non-employee directors for their attendance at
board or committee meetings or for serving on a board committee or as the
chairman of a board committee.
- 102
-
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Introduction
This section presents
information concerning the compensation arrangements for our executive officers.
Our company was formed to conduct the precision measurement and foil resistor
business of Vishay Intertechnology. Historically, this business was conducted as
part of the passive components segment of Vishay Intertechnology through various
direct and indirect subsidiaries and not as part of a single subsidiary holding
company. With the formation of Vishay Precision Group in the latter part of
2009, Vishay Intertechnology began the process of moving its precision
measurement and foil resistor business to the company and its subsidiaries, a
process that will be completed prior to the spin-off date. Ziv Shoshani, who has
been functioning as our principal executive officer, will be our President and
Chief Executive Officer, and William Clancy, who has been functioning as our
principal financial officer, will be our Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Both Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy have served as officers of
various wholly-owned subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology, including Vishay
Precision Group, Inc., and are at present our only executive officers.
Mr. Shoshani has been
an executive officer of Vishay Intertechnology since 2003 but will step down
from that position on the distribution date. Mr. Clancy has been an employee of
Vishay Intertechnology since 1988 but did not serve as an executive officer of
Vishay Intertechnology. We anticipate that Mr. Thomas Kieffer, who will be our
Chief Technology Officer, will become an executive officer of our company
effective as of the distribution date. Mr. Kieffer is presently employed in one
of Vishay Precision Group’s subsidiaries.
We present historical financial
information concerning the compensation of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy and
Kieffer for 2009. This information reflects compensation received for all of
2009 and includes compensation received from Vishay Intertechnology prior to the
time they became executive officers of our company. This historical compensation
may not be directly relevant to the compensation that Messrs. Shoshani and
Clancy will receive from us.
We also present information
concerning the future compensation of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer
under “2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision Group.” These compensation
arrangements have been negotiated between the respective officers and the
strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology with the
advice of management and approved by the Vishay Intertechnology board of
directors. We anticipate that following the distribution date, Mr. Shoshani will
enter into an employment agreement with us, consistent with the terms set forth
below, which will be negotiated between Mr. Shoshani and our compensation
committee.
Messrs. Shoshani and
Clancy hold certain equity-based long-term incentive awards that were granted to
them by Vishay Intertechnology. The treatment of these awards in the spin-off is
described under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions –
Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology – Employee Matters Agreement – Equity
Awards.”
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
This Compensation
Discussion and Analysis describes certain elements of the compensation
arrangements for the named executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology, and its
compensation philosophy, particularly as they relate to Mr. Shoshani. We believe
that certain of the compensation arrangements and elements of compensation
philosophy at Vishay Intertechnology have relevance for understanding the
initial compensation arrangements for our executive officers, because the
strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology were
responsible in part for determining the initial compensation of Messrs.
Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer, our executive officers. In addition, we expect
that certain elements of the compensation for our executive officers will be
similar to the elements of the executive compensation at Vishay Intertechnology.
- 103 -
We note, however,
that following the distribution date, our board of directors will establish a
compensation committee that will be responsible for our company’s executive
compensation. We anticipate that the compensation committee will review all
aspects of the compensation of our executive officers, and the compensation
philosophy of our compensation committee following the distribution date could
differ from the historical compensation philosophy of Vishay Intertechnology.
While we anticipate that, at least initially, the compensation committee will
leave intact the arrangements with our executive officers described below, the
committee could determine to make changes, either in the short- or long-term.
The compensation committee of our board will also be responsible for entering
into an employment agreement with Mr. Shoshani, in his intended role as our
Chief Executive Officer.
Compensation Philosophy Generally
The compensation
programs of Vishay Intertechnology were historically designed to support its
business goals and promote its short- and long-term profitable growth. The
equity plans of Vishay Intertechnology are designed to ensure that executive
compensation programs and practices are aligned with the long-term interests of
the Vishay Intertechnology stockholders. The total compensation of each
individual varies with individual performance and Vishay Intertechnology’s
overall performance in achieving financial and non-financial objectives.
The compensation
committee and management of Vishay Intertechnology believe that compensation
should help to recruit, retain, and motivate key employees who can function
effectively both in periods of recession and economic upturn. Ordinarily an
executive officer’s total compensation should consist of a combination of cash
payments and equity awards, to achieve the right balance between short- and
long-term performance. Equity-based compensation should serve to align the
interests of management with those of stockholders. Severance protection should
provide executives with an appropriate level of job security, commensurate with
their contributions to the company and their tenure.
The compensation
committee of Vishay Intertechnology, in consultation with the company’s chief
executive officer, undertakes an annual review of the compensation arrangements
of the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology.
Vishay Intertechnology historically
has taken into account what it terms “adjusted net income,” among other things,
in setting bonuses for its two most senior executive officers. Vishay
Intertechnology uses this term to mean net income determined in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), adjusted to exclude
various items that management believes are not indicative of the intrinsic
operating performance of its business, including restructuring and related
severance costs, fixed asset or inventory write-downs and related purchase
commitment charges, impairment charges for goodwill or indefinite-lived
intangible assets, and individually material one-time gains or charges.
The employment agreements of these two executives sets forth that their bonus
will be equal to a percentage of adjusted net income, subject to a maximum bonus
equal to three times base salary.
The bonuses for the other executive
officers and managers of Vishay Intertechnology, including Mr. Shoshani, have
historically generally been based on achievement of a combination of corporate
and personal objectives. Corporate objectives have included, among other
things, “adjusted operating margin,” which means operating income determined in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, adjusted to exclude various items that management
believes are not indicative of the intrinsic operating performance of its
business, including restructuring and related severance costs, fixed asset or
inventory write-downs and related purchase commitment charges, impairment
charges for goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets, and individually
material one-time gains or charges. For those managers who are not
executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology and whose bonus performance
measures include adjusted operating margin, the adjusted operating margin used
may either be the adjusted operating margin of Vishay Intertechnology or the
adjusted operating margin of a particular division or business unit of Vishay
Intertechnology. Other components of the bonus determination for such
other executive officers and managers have included additional corporate
financial and operational objectives, as well as personal goals, in each case
tailored to the executives’ specific responsibilities.
In the early part of each calendar
year, the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology, in consultation with
its Executive Chairman and CEO, establishes the target adjusted operating margin
for Vishay Intertechnology, as well as additional appropriate financial
measure(s) for individual executives and business units. The achievement
of performance objectives at the corporate and business unit level as well as
for each executive individually, is reviewed by the CEO and the compensation
committee upon the availability of year-end financial results, resulting in a
performance score for the executive in each of several categories. The
executive’s total performance score represents the percentage of the executive’s
base salary earned as a bonus. Each executive’s maximum performance score
is established either pursuant to the executive’s employment contract (if any)
or by the compensation committee at the time the annual performance objectives
are set at the commencement of the year.
The compensation committee and
management of Vishay Intertechnology have always believed that the elements of
compensation for the company’s senior executives reward intrinsically sound
management decisions and do not encourage risk-taking to enhance short-term
profitability at the expense of the long-term health and viability of the
enterprise.
- 104 -
In designing executive
compensation arrangements to avoid encouraging inappropriate risk-taking, the
compensation committee considers various factors which are intended to provide
an appropriate mix of compensation components, with no portion being too heavily
weighted towards the achievement of short-term goals. Historically, such
consideration has largely been incorporated into the committee’s general
deliberation of the overall structure and terms of executive compensation
arrangements. In response to current trends in executive compensation
practices, as well as recently adopted SEC rules encouraging more explicit focus
on risks arising from compensation policies, Vishay Intertechnology has
commenced a practice of more deliberately focusing on the risks, if any, arising
from its executive compensation arrangements, and modifying such arrangements to
the extent necessary to minimize any such risks.
The factors considered by
the compensation committee in evaluating the risks arising from compensation
arrangements, which have been incorporated into the terms and conditions of such
compensation arrangements, include, in no particular weighting or order of
prominence:
-
base salaries are fixed in amount,
-
capping annual cash bonuses for executive officers.
While annual cash bonuses focus on the achievement of short-term or annual
goals and short-term goals may encourage risk-taking, the committee considers
the other compensation arrangements which appropriately balance risk and the
desire to focus on short-term goals.
-
deferring a meaningful portion of total compensation until retirement
or termination of employment,
-
compensating executives, in part, in the form of phantom
stock units for which the stock is only received upon retirement or
termination of employment, thus providing an incentive for the creation of
long-term shareholder value. The value of these restricted stock units
is at risk if Vishay Intertechnology’s stock price declines.
Each of these factors is intended to encourage
an appropriately long-term focus, and to align the long-term interests of senior
management with those of stockholders.
As described below, in response to the global
recession, at the beginning of 2009, the compensation committee determined not
to award any bonus compensation for 2009. This is consistent with the
committee
’
s
prudent management of compensation matters and further serves to avoid
inappropriate risk-taking by our employees.
- 105 -
Employment Agreements
In 2004, under the
direction of its compensation committee and with the advice of a compensation
consultant, Vishay Intertechnology engaged in a major review and overhaul of the
compensation practices for its named executive officers. As a consequence of
this review, Vishay Intertechnology entered into comprehensive employment
agreements and other arrangements with each of its named executive officers at
the time, including Mr. Shoshani. The agreement and other arrangements with Mr.
Shoshani, except for base salary, have remained unchanged since that time.
The compensation
arrangements embodied in the agreements with each of the executive officers at
the time, including the agreement with Mr. Shoshani, were based upon the
expectation that they would remain in place for a period of time. The agreements
have an evergreen feature, whereby at the end of each year another year is
added, so that effectively the agreements always have three remaining years in
their term. An evergreen term is essentially similar to the right of an
executive to receive severance if the company does not renew his employment
agreement at the end of its stated term. As a consequence, the compensation
arrangements can only be modified with the respective executive’s consent,
without which the executive would otherwise have the right to terminate
employment and receive severance pay.
Response to the Global Recession
The nearly
unprecedented disruption in the global economy that began in the summer of 2008
and that continued into late 2009 had a substantial impact on the compensation
policies of Vishay Intertechnology in 2009. Conservation of cash and generating
free cash, which Vishay Intertechnology defines as cash flow from operations
less cash used for capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sale of fixed
assets, became central to the company’s short-term management objectives. Among
the measures that Vishay Intertechnology undertook to conserve cash was the
imposition of a freeze on compensation, where possible, and the elimination of
bonuses for 2009. Although contractually entitled to cash bonus compensation,
the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology agreed to forgo these bonuses
in 2009 unless conditions improved. Also, the compensation committee of Vishay
Intertechnology determined not to make any discretionary award of equity-based
compensation for 2009, in part because of the unsettled market environment and
because of the depressed price of the company’s stock to historically low levels
at the time. With the improvement in the worldwide economy and the business of
Vishay Intertechnology beginning in late 2009 and carrying forward into the
first half of 2010, Vishay Intertechnology expects that its compensation
committee will resume its historical compensation packages for 2010.
Compensation Components
The components of the compensation
packages for the named executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology, as
prescribed by their employment agreements, include base salary, commensurate
with the roles and responsibility of the executives; annual performance-based
bonuses; deferred compensation; and customary welfare and retirement benefits.
The compensation committee also considers the award of extra-contractual
equity-based compensation on a year-by-year basis. In making its compensation
determinations, the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology reviews
data on compensation practices of 47 public companies that are similar to Vishay
Intertechnology in terms of revenues, number of employees, market
capitalization, geographic location and/or scope of international operations,
and that are found in the Fortune 1000 listing and the S&P MidCap 400 Index.
These companies include several active in the semiconductor and electronic
components industry, and others in different industries.
While
the Committee believes that its compensation practices for executives are
generally in line with compensation practices at the 47 companies whose data it
reviews, it did not perform a quantitative benchmarking analysis and did not set
compensation within a specific range of such data
.
- 106 -
The public companies reviewed for general comparison
included:
Direct Competitors of Vishay
|
Other Fortune 1000 Semiconductor
|
Other S&P MidCap 400
|
Intertechnology
|
and Electronic Components
|
Components
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
|
|
-
ON Semiconductor
-
Fairchild
Semiconductor
-
International
Rectifier
-
AVX
-
KEMET Corporation
|
-
Xilinx
-
Novellus
-
Lam Research
-
Sandisk
-
Maxim Integrated
Products
-
LSI
-
KLA Tencor
-
National
Semiconductor
-
Analog Devices
-
Spansion
-
Amkor
-
Benchmark Electronics
-
NVIDIA
-
Broadcom
-
Micron
-
Advanced Micro
Devices
-
Applied Materials
-
Flextronics
-
Sanmina-SCI
-
Texas Instruments
-
Intel
|
-
Ametek
-
Palm
-
SPX
-
Diebold
-
Imation
-
Hubbell Inc
-
Arrow
-
FMC
-
Aqua America
-
Thomas & Betts
-
Charming Shoppes
-
SEI Investments
-
Teleflex
-
Toll Brothers
-
Urban Outfitters
-
Wilmington Trust
-
Endo Pharmaceuticals
-
Cephalon
-
Cabot Corporation
-
Atmel
-
Avnet
|
The compensation
packages for the senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology also include
severance benefits that the compensation committee believes are consistent with
severance programs for similarly situated senior executives at comparable public
companies.
- 107 -
Ziv Shoshani
Although Mr. Shoshani
assumed the role of principal executive officer of our company effective
November 1, 2009, he continues to be compensated as an executive officer of
Vishay Intertechnology, in accordance with his existing employment arrangements,
until the distribution date.
General
. The compensation package of Mr. Shoshani has
been somewhat lower than the compensation of executive officers of his rank at
other, comparable public companies in consideration of his transitional status
in the management structure of Vishay Intertechnology, prior to his assuming
chief executive responsibilities for our company. This was part of the
succession program of Vishay Intertechnology, whereby Mr. Shoshani was in
preparation to assume more senior executive responsibilities.
Base salary
. The minimum base salary level for Mr.
Shoshani was fixed in his 2004 employment agreement. The compensation committee
of Vishay Intertechnology reviews the base salary level each year to determine
whether an increase would be appropriate, considering individual performance,
prior years’ compensation level, recent operating results, operating results of
competitors, projections for the future, other components of the executive pay
packages, perceived salary trends in executive base salary among the peer group
of Vishay Intertechnology and input on executive performance from the chief
executive officer. Determining the base salary is qualitative and subjective,
and no specific quantitative weighting of the various factors is assigned.
Qualitatively, individual performance, projections of future individual
performance, perceived salary trends among peer group companies, and the input
on executive performance by the chief executive officer generally are
given more weight.
The base salary for Mr. Shoshani
remained the same through 2005, but was increased in each of 2006, 2007, and
2008. Also, because the base salary of Mr. Shoshani has been denominated in
Israeli shekels beginning in 2007, a portion of the increase in his salary since
then, expressed in terms of U.S. dollars, reflects the significant weakening of
the dollar against the shekel. Mr. Shoshani’s base salary, as denominated in
Israeli shekels, remained unchanged in 2009 from the prior year, in response to
the unprecedented global recession consistent with all of the executive officers
of Vishay Intertechnology.
Performance
bonus
. Under his employment contract, Mr. Shoshani is eligible for a
performance bonus of up to 42.5% of his base salary. The amount of bonus
payable to Mr. Shoshani is determined by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation
committee, based on the company’s performance and Mr. Shoshani’s individual
performance.
For 2009, Mr. Shoshani’s
corporate performance metrics included divisional adjusted operating margin and
inventory turnover, in each case for the combined Measurements Group and Foil
Resistors divisions. With respect the adjusted operating margin
performance metric, Mr. Shoshani would not be eligible to receive a bonus if
actual performance were less than or equal to 80% of target. If actual
adjusted operating margin were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Shoshani
would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to
adjusted operating margin, increasing ratably from 0% to 60% of the maximum
bonus potential for adjusted operating margin. Finally, if actual adjusted
operating margin were between 100% and 120% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be
eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to adjusted
operating margin, increasing ratably from 60% to 100% of the maximum bonus
potential for adjusted operating margin.
The combined Measurements
Group and Foil Resistors divisional adjusted operating margin target for 2009
was $47.9 million, and Mr. Shoshani would have been entitled to receive a bonus
of 30% of his base salary based on achievement of divisional adjusted operating
margin at 120% of target. Because the actual adjusted operating margin was
less than 80% of the target, Mr. Shoshani did not earn any portion of his bonus
potential with respect to the divisional adjusted operating margin
component.
Mr. Shoshani would have
been eligible to receive a bonus of 5% of his base salary based on achievement
of targeted combined Measurements Group and Foil Resistors divisional inventory
turnover. The divisional inventory turnover target for 2009 was
2.89x. Because the actual inventory turnover was less than the target, Mr.
Shoshani did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with respect to the
divisional inventory turnover component.
Finally, Mr. Shoshani
would have been eligible to receive a bonus of up to 7.5% of his base salary
based on the achievement of individual performance goals in 2009. The individual
performance goals are established by the Chief Executive Officer of Vishay
Intertechnology in consultation with Mr. Shoshani at the beginning of each
calendar year, and the Vishay Intertechnology Chief Executive Officer determines
the extent to which the performance goals are met following the end of each
year, which is ratified by the Board of Directors of Vishay Intertechnology. For
2009, Mr. Shoshani's individual performance goals and related bonus opportunity
as a percentage of base salary (in parentheses) included achieving a $5 million
reduction in fixed costs of the Vishay Intertechnology Foil & Measurement
Group without a freeze in employee compensation, versus the 2009 budget (2%),
reducing the capital equipment spending budget for the Foil & Measurement
Group to $2.6 million (2%), timely completion of the relocation of the Netanya,
Israel facility production to the Carmiel, Israel facility (1%), completing the
closure of the Breda customer service and warehouse (1%), and monitoring the
relocation of the sample center to Columbus, Nebraska and the relocation of the
Kanot warehouse relocation to Be'er Sheva, Israel (1.5%).
- 108 -
As noted above under
“Response to the Global Recession,” Mr. Shoshani, along with the other executive
officers of Vishay Intertechnology, agreed to forgo any performance bonus to
which he otherwise would be entitled for 2009, in consideration of the
challenging business environment during the year. Because bonuses were foregone,
performance objective achievement was not quantified. However, Vishay
Intertechnology management estimates that Mr. Shoshani would have been eligible
for a bonus of between $15,000 and $22,900 based on the achievement of his
individual performance goals.
Incentive compensation
. The compensation committee of Vishay
Intertechnology makes an annual determination whether to award extra-contractual
equity-based compensation to the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology on
a year-by-year basis. As noted above, the committee determined not to make any
such awards for 2009, again in consideration of the challenging business
environment during the year. Mr. Shoshani was eligible for extra-contractual
Restricted Stock Units (
“
RSUs”) in 2008,
however, Vishay Intertechnology had to make certain regulatory filings in Israel
before such grant could be made. These approvals were received in 2009, and the
grant was made accordingly.
Deferred compensation
. Vishay Intertechnology executives are
eligible to participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which is
available to all employees who meet certain criteria under the Internal Revenue
Code. Vishay Intertechnology annually contributes $100,000 to this plan on
behalf of Mr. Shoshani, pursuant to his employment agreement, similar to the
contributions for other of its senior executives. Mr. Shoshani, along with other
senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology, has elected to defer all eligible
amounts of compensation until retirement or termination of employment, at which
time the amounts would be paid in a lump sum. To the extent required to avoid
tax penalties, the deferred amounts are not paid until six months after the
termination of employment. Mr. Shoshani, like most other senior executives of
Vishay Intertechnology has a long-standing relationship with the company. At the
suggestion of management, the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee
therefore considered this deferred compensation in the nature of a retirement
benefit and an anticipatory reward for loyalty to Vishay Intertechnology over
time. While deferred, amounts are credited with “earnings” based on the
performance of notional investment options available under the plan. No portion
of the earnings credited during 2009 was “above market” or
“preferential.”
Phantom stock units
. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr.
Shoshani receives annual grants of phantom stock units, similar to the grants
for other senior executives of Vishay Intertechnology. The grants are made under
the stockholder-approved Vishay Intertechnology Senior Executive Phantom Stock
Plan. Similar to the deferred cash compensation described above, the Vishay
Intertechnology compensation committee considers the grant of phantom stock
units in the nature of a retirement benefit and an anticipatory reward for
loyalty to Vishay Intertechnology over time. The cumulative increase in the
number of phantom stock units held by the executives over time also is intended
to strengthen the alignment of executive and stockholder interests in the
long-term appreciation of the equity value of Vishay Intertechnology. The
deferred equity compensation consists of 5,000 phantom stock units awarded to
each executive on the first business day of each calendar year and was fixed by
contract in 2004.
Severance
. The Vishay Intertechnology compensation
committee believes that severance payments in the event of an involuntary
termination of employment are part of a standard compensation package for senior
executives. Consequently, in 2004, the compensation committee included severance
provisions for Vishay Intertechnology executive officers in their employment
contracts.
Mr. Shoshani’s
employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology contains severance provisions
providing generally for three years of compensation in the case of a termination
without cause or a voluntary termination by the executive for “good reason” (as
defined in the employment agreement). Specifically, severance items
include:
-
salary continuation for three
years, payable over three years;
-
5,000 shares of common stock
annually for three years. Because these shares are granted after termination
of employment, actual shares – rather than phantom stock units – are
granted;
-
bonus for the year of
termination;
-
$1,500,000 lump sum cash payment.
This payment replaces the annual deferred compensation credits and the annual
bonus for the 3-year severance period;
-
lifetime continuation of
executive’s life insurance benefit; and
-
continuation of the executive’s
medical benefit for a maximum of three years if the termination occurs before
attaining age 62 and lifetime continuation up to $15,000 annual premium value
if the termination occurs after attaining age 62.
- 109 -
The following table
sets forth the compensation that would have been received by Mr. Shoshani had he
been terminated as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
Nonqualified
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum
|
|
insurance /
|
|
deferred
|
continuation
|
|
|
|
Stock grants
|
|
termination
|
|
medical
|
|
compensation
|
(1)
|
|
Bonus (2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
payment
|
|
benefit (4)
|
|
(5)
|
$
|
916,077
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
125,250
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
$
|
36,569
|
|
$
|
636,957
|
|
(1)
|
|
Equals
3 times U.S. dollar value of 2009 salary, paid over three
years.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of bonus and non-equity incentive plan compensation as
reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table,” which is zero for 2009 due
to a decision by the executive officers of Vishay Intertechnology to
voluntarily forgo bonuses in response to the global
recession.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Equals
15,000 shares multiplied by $8.35, which was the closing price of Vishay
Intertechnology’s common stock on December 31, 2009. The shares are to be
paid out over three years.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Present value of accumulated benefit reflected in the “Pension
Benefits” table, paid annually until death.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Aggregate balance at year end as reflected in the “Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation” table.
|
Retirement benefits
. The Vishay Intertechnology compensation
committee believes that providing an adequate retirement benefit commensurate
with position is essential to retaining qualified individuals for long-term
employment. The retirement benefits for Mr. Shoshani are not materially
preferential to those of other employees of Vishay Intertechnology.
Perquisites
. Vishay Intertechnology provides
executive officers, including Mr. Shoshani with perquisites and other personal
benefits that the company and its compensation committee believe are reasonable
and consistent with our overall compensation program. These perquisites are not
intended, however, to constitute a material portion of the executive’s
compensation packages. In general, the perquisites, while not integral to the
performance of an executive’s duties, must bear some relationship to the
executive’s employment and be of perceived benefit to Vishay Intertechnology.
The Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee periodically reviews the
levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to the company’s
executive officers, including Mr. Shoshani.
Israeli benefits
. Mr. Shoshani is a resident of Israel. As a
result, he is entitled to certain benefits that are generally available to
employees in Israel on a non-discriminatory basis, including:
-
advanced training fund, 7.5% of
base salary;
-
severance fund, 8.33% of base
salary;
-
disability insurance, 2.5% of base
salary; and
-
pension fund, 5% of base
salary.
These benefits are
required by Israeli law and employment practices generally, and were taken into
account by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee in formulating the
overall compensation package for Mr. Shoshani.
2010 compensation
.
Until the distribution date, Mr. Shoshani will be compensated under the terms of
his existing employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology and as otherwise
determined by the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology. The
compensation committee, with advice from management, has determined, in light of
the pending spin-off, to maintain Mr. Shoshani’s base compensation through the
distribution date at the same level for 2010 as in 2009 and not to award any
discretionary long-term compensation of Vishay Intertechnology equity to Mr.
Shoshani in 2010. Mr. Shoshani will receive a one-time cash bonus from
Vishay Intertechnology in the amount of $600,000 upon the
successful completion of the spin-off. The only requirement that needs to
be met in order for Mr. Shoshani to receive this special bonus is the successful
completion of the spin-off. Corporate or individual performance following
the spin-off will not affect Mr. Shoshani right to receive or retain this
special bonus from Vishay Intertechnology. See “2010 Compensation from Vishay
Precision Group
–
Employment Terms – Ziv Shoshani – Special bonuses.”
- 110 -
William M. Clancy
Historical compensation
. Mr. Clancy served as senior vice president
and corporate controller of Vishay Intertechnology from 2005 until he began
functioning as our principal financial officer on November 1, 2009. While
serving with Vishay Intertechnology, he was not an executive officer, and his
compensation was determined in a manner similar to other members of the
non-executive management of Vishay Intertechnology. Non-executive management
compensation packages at Vishay Intertechnology have historically been developed
to provide a competitive base salary and incentive compensation based on
personal objectives and the results of the company. Mr. Clancy does not have an
employment contract with Vishay Intertechnology. In accordance with the policy
of Vishay Intertechnology described above and implemented to contend with the
2008-2009 recessionary environment, Mr. Clancy’s base salary remained the same
in 2009 as in 2008, and he was not awarded a performance bonus in 2009. Mr.
Clancy was not awarded any long-term compensation in the form of Vishay
Intertechnology equity in 2009. Mr. Clancy
’
s compensation was
unchanged after he began functioning as our principal financial officer on
November 1, 2009.
Performance bonus
.
For 2009, Mr. Clancy was eligible for a
performance bonus of up to 30% of his base salary. The amount of bonus
payable to Mr. Clancy is determined by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation
committee, based on the company’s performance and Mr. Clancy’s individual
performance.
For 2009, Mr. Clancy’s corporate performance metrics included
adjusted operating margin and the attainment of the general and administrative
budget, in each case for Vishay Intertechnology. With respect the adjusted
operating margin performance metric, Mr. Clancy would not be eligible to receive
a bonus if actual performance were less than or equal to 80% of target. If
actual adjusted operating margin were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Clancy
would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to
adjusted operating margin, increasing ratably from 0% to 60% of the maximum
bonus potential for adjusted operating margin. Finally, if actual adjusted
operating margin were between 100% and 120% of target, Mr. Clancy would be
eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to adjusted
operating margin, increasing ratably from 60% to 100% of the maximum bonus
potential for adjusted operating margin.
The Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin target
for 2009 was $215.5 million, and Mr. Clancy would have been entitled to receive
a bonus of 15% of his base salary based on achievement of adjusted operating
margin at 120% of target. Because the actual adjusted operating margin was
less than 80% of the target, Mr. Clancy did not earn any portion of his bonus
potential with respect to the adjusted operating margin component.
Mr. Clancy was eligible to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to
3.75% of his base salary based on the attainment of the general and
administrative budget. The general and administrative budget target for
2009 was $3.4 million. Because the actual general and administrative
budget was within the budget, Mr. Clancy earned $7,669, equal to 3.75% of his
base salary, with respect to the general and administrative budget component of
his bonus.
- 111 -
Finally, Mr. Clancy was eligible to receive a bonus for 2009
equal to 11.25% of his base salary based on the achievement of individual
performance goals. The individual performance goals are established by
the Chief Accounting Officer of Vishay Intertechnology in consultation
with Mr. Clancy at the beginning of each calendar year, and the Vishay
Intertechnology Chief Accounting Officer determines the extent to which the
performance goals are met following the end of each year. For 2009, Mr. Clancy's
individual performance goals and related bonus opportunity as a percentage of
base salary (in parentheses) included the assumption of a management role in the
Ecomal Israel subsidiary to assist the Ecomal Israel controller in
attention to internal controls (2.25%), meeting with the four regional
controllers at least once a year to aid in the optimization of internal controls
in their respective regions in 2009 (3.375%), continuing to work with the
management team to improve the cash flows reporting system (2.25%), continuing
to make improvements in the reporting of board reports (1.6875%), assisting
senior management in taking on more responsibility for the 2009 audit and
ensuring that deadlines were met, and assisting the new vice president of
Internal Audit (1.6875%).
Nevertheless, as noted above under “Response to the Global
Recession,” the compensation committee of Vishay Intertechnology determined not
to award any performance bonuses for 2009, in consideration of the challenging
business environment during the year. Because bonuses were foregone, performance
objective achievement was not quantified. However, Vishay Intertechnology
management estimates that Mr. Clancy would have been eligible for a bonus of
between $25,500 and $30,600 based on the achievement of his individual
performance goals and the attainment of his general and administrative
budget.
Mr. Clancy
participates in the Vishay Intertechnology nonqualified deferred compensation
plan to which Vishay Intertechnology contributed on his behalf and receives
certain customary perquisites related to his employment.
Mr. Clancy also
participated in the Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan,
which provides defined benefits to U.S. employees whose benefits under the
qualified pension plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code. This plan was
contributory and, other than the fact that it is nonqualified under ERISA,
provides substantially the same benefits that are available under Vishay
Intertechnology’s qualified retirement plan. Effective January 1, 2009, the U.S.
pension plans have been frozen. Benefits accumulated as of December 31, 2008
will be paid to employees upon retirement, but no further benefits will accrue
beyond that date.
Under the standard
severance practice of Vishay Intertechnology in the United States for employees
of Mr. Clancy’s rank, upon termination without cause, Mr. Clancy would be
entitled to receive twelve weeks’ severance in exchange for executing a release
and non-disparagement agreement, plus one week of severance for each year of
service with Vishay Intertechnology. If Mr. Clancy were to have been terminated
at December 31, 2009, he would have been entitled to receive approximately
$134,000 in severance. Mr. Clancy would also receive accrued benefits under the
Vishay Nonqualified Retirement Plan (present value of $185,719 at December 31,
2009) in the event of a termination for any reason, as well as his accumulated
balance in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan ($150,921 at December 31,
2009).
2010 compensation
. Until the distribution date, Mr. Clancy will
be compensated in accordance with current practice at Vishay Intertechnology. In
light of the pending spin-off, Mr. Clancy’s base compensation through the
distribution date will be paid at the same level for 2010 as in
2009.
- 112 -
Thomas P.
Kieffer
Historical compensation
. Mr. Kieffer has
served as senior vice president for corporate research and development for
Vishay Intertechnology
’
s Measurements
Group and Foil Resistors Division since January 1, 2008. Prior to
that, Mr. Kieffer was senior vice president of Vishay Intertechnology’s
Micro-Measurements and Load Cells Divisions. While serving with Vishay
Intertechnology, he was not an executive officer, and his compensation was
determined in a manner similar to other members of the non-executive management
of Vishay Intertechnology. Non-executive management compensation packages at
Vishay Intertechnology have historically been developed to provide a competitive
base salary and incentive compensation based on personal objectives and the
results of the company. Mr. Kieffer does not have an employment contract with
Vishay Intertechnology. In accordance with the policy of Vishay Intertechnology
described above and implemented to contend with the 2008-2009 recessionary
environment, Mr. Kieffer’s base salary remained the same in 2009 as in 2008, and
he was not awarded a performance bonus in 2009. Mr. Kieffer was not awarded any
long-term compensation in the form of Vishay Intertechnology equity in
2009.
Performance
bonus
. For 2009, Mr. Kieffer was eligible for a performance bonus of up
to 35% of his base salary. The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Kieffer is
determined by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee, based on the
company’s performance and Mr. Kieffer’s individual performance.
For 2009, Mr. Kieffer’s
corporate performance metrics included divisional adjusted operating margin the
Micro-Measurements division, Vishay Intertechnology adjusted operating margin,
and inventory turnover for the Micro-Measurements division. With respect
each of the Micro-Measurements division and the Vishay Intertechnology adjusted
operating margin performance metrics, Mr. Kieffer would not be eligible to
receive a bonus with respect to such metric if actual performance under that
metric were less than or equal to 80% of target for that metric. If actual
adjusted operating margin were between 80% and 100% of target for one of those
metrics, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum
bonus with respect to such metric, increasing ratably from 0% to 60% of the
maximum bonus potential for such metric. Finally, if actual adjusted
operating margin were between 100% and 120% of target for one of those metrics,
Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with
respect to such metric, increasing ratably from 60% to 100% of the maximum bonus
potential for such metric.
Mr. Kieffer’s divisional
adjusted operating margin target for the Micro-Measurements division for 2009
was $16.3 million, and Mr. Kieffer would have received a 2009 bonus equal to
17.5% of his base salary based on the achievement of 120% of that target
level. Because the actual adjusted operating margin was less than 80% of
the target, Mr. Kieffer did not earn any portion of his bonus potential with
respect to the Micro-Measurements divisional adjusted operating margin
component.
The Vishay Intertechnology
adjusted operating margin target for 2009 was $215.5 million, and Mr. Kieffer
would have received a 2009 bonus equal to 7.5% of his base salary based on the
achievement of 120% of that target level. Because the actual adjusted
operating margin was less than 80% of the target, Mr. Kieffer did not earn any
portion of his bonus potential with respect to the Vishay Intertechnology
adjusted operating margin component.
- 113 -
Mr. Kieffer was eligible
to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to 5% of his base salary based on achievement
of the divisional inventory turnover target for the Micro-Measurements
division. The divisional inventory turnover target for 2009 was
3.58x. Because the actual divisional inventory turnover amount was less
than the target, Mr. Kieffer did not earn any portion of his bonus potential
with respect to the divisional inventory turnover component.
Finally, Mr. Kieffer was
eligible to receive a bonus for 2009 equal to 5% of his base salary based on the
achievement of individual performance goals. The individual performance
goals are established by the Chief Operating Officer of Vishay
Intertechnology in consultation with Mr. Kieffer at the beginning of each
calendar year, and the Vishay Intertechnology Chief Operating Officer determines
the extent to which the performance goals are met following the end of each
year. For 2009, Mr. Keiffer's individual performance goals and related bonus
opportunity as a percentage of base salary (in parentheses) included achieving
$600,000 of cost reduction without a freeze in employee compensation,
versus the 2009 budget (2%), limiting capital expenditures to $350,000 (0.5%),
completing a specified product development solution in a timely manner (0.5%),
achieving specified sales and technology advances in a truck weighing system
(0.5%), releasing new sensors technology to production (0.5%), generating
divisional purchasing savings in 2009 of 3% versus 2008 (0.5%), and providing
miniature strain gage technology sensors to customers in the pressure market
segment (0.5%).
As noted above under
“Response to the Global Recession,” the compensation committee of Vishay
Intertechnology determined not to award any performance bonuses, in
consideration of the challenging business environment during the year. Because
bonuses were foregone, performance objective achievement was not
quantified. However, Vishay Intertechnology management estimates that Mr.
Kieffer would have been eligible for a bonus of between $4,700 and $9,400 based
on the achievement of his individual performance goals.
Mr. Kieffer participates in the
Vishay Intertechnology nonqualified deferred compensation plan and receives
certain customary perquisites related to his employment.
Under the standard severance
practice of Vishay Intertechnology in the United States for employees of Mr.
Kieffer’s rank, upon termination without cause, Mr. Kieffer would be entitled to
receive twelve weeks’ severance in exchange for executing a release and
non-disparagement agreement, plus one week of severance for each year of service
with Vishay Intertechnology. If Mr. Kieffer were to have been terminated at
December 31, 2009, he would have been entitled to receive approximately $138,000
in severance. Mr. Kieffer would also receive his accumulated balance in the
nonqualified deferred compensation plan ($856,040 at December 31, 2009) in the
event of a termination for any reason.
2010 compensation
. Until the distribution
date, Mr. Kieffer will be compensated in accordance with current practice at
Vishay Intertechnology. In light of the pending spin-off, Mr. Kieffer’s base
compensation through the distribution date will be paid at the same level for
2010 as in 2009.
HISTORICAL COMPENSATION
TABLES
The information set forth in the
following tables reflects compensation earned by Mr. Ziv Shoshani, Mr. William
Clancy, and Mr. Thomas Kieffer based upon services rendered to Vishay
Intertechnology through October 31, 2009 and services rendered to our company
from November 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. The services rendered to Vishay
Intertechnology by the Named Executive Officers through October 31,
2009 were different than the services being rendered to our company in their
current positions as executive officers. The information below is not indicative
of the compensation that the Named Executive Officers will receive as executive
officers of our company following the distribution date. See “2010 Compensation
from Vishay Precision Group.”
The information
included in the table should be read in conjunction with the footnotes which
follow, the descriptions of the employment agreements with Mr. Shoshani
described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the “Grants of Plan
Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested,”
“Pension Benefits,” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” tables on the pages
which follow.
Name and Principal
Position
(a)
|
|
Year
(b)
|
|
Salary
(1)
($)
(c)
|
|
Stock
Awards
(2)
($)
(e)
|
|
Option
Awards
(3)
($)
(f)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
(4)
($)
(g)
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred Comp.
Earnings
(5)
(6)
($)
(h)
|
|
All
Other
Comp.
(7)
($)
(i)
|
|
Total
($)
(j)
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
305,359
|
|
$
|
69,700
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8,957
|
|
$
|
222,385
|
|
$
|
606,401
|
President and Chief Executive
|
|
2008
|
|
|
334,819
|
|
|
57,100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
39,341
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
297,824
|
|
|
732,748
|
Officer
designee
|
|
2007
|
|
|
281,724
|
|
|
68,750
|
|
|
356,250
|
|
|
69,586
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
206,563
|
|
|
982,873
|
|
William M. Clancy
|
|
2009
|
|
|
204,516
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
30,855
|
|
|
48,661
|
|
|
284,032
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief
|
|
2008
|
|
|
204,516
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
39,144
|
|
|
23,940
|
|
|
37,692
|
|
|
305,292
|
Financial Officer
designee
|
|
2007
|
|
|
197,600
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
40,014
|
|
|
46,112
|
|
|
35,430
|
|
|
319,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Kieffer
|
|
2009
|
|
|
188,455
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
33,598
|
|
|
222,053
|
Sr. Vice President and Chief
|
|
2008
|
|
|
188,455
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
28,348
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
31,940
|
|
|
248,743
|
Technical Officer
designee
|
|
2007
|
|
|
182,109
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
29,143
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
35,039
|
|
|
246,291
|
(1)
|
|
Column (c)
reflects base salary earned during each year and, for Messrs. Clancy and
Kieffer, includes amounts deferred in accordance with the provisions of
Vishay Intertechnology’s 401(k) and deferred compensation plans. The
employment agreement for Mr. Shoshani specifies that his salary be
denominated and paid in foreign currency (Israeli shekel). The amounts
presented above have been converted into U.S. dollars at the
weighted-average exchange rate for the year.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Column (e)
represents the grant-date fair value of 5,000 phantom stock units awarded
annually to Mr. Shoshani pursuant to the terms of his employment
agreement, and the grant-date fair value of restricted stock units awarded
to Mr. Shoshani. No amounts are included for performance-based restricted
stock units for which performance objectives were not achieved. Note that
for financial statement reporting purposes, the amount of compensation
expense for restricted stock units is recognized ratably over the vesting
period of the respective awards. The grant-date fair value does not
necessarily reflect the value of shares actually received or which may be
received in the future with respect to these awards. There can be no
assurance that the grant-date fair value of these awards will ever be
realized.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Column (f)
represents the grant-date fair value of stock options granted to Mr.
Shoshani during 2007. The grant-date fair value is recognized over the
vesting periods of the respective awards. There can be no assurance that
the grant-date fair value of these awards will ever be realized. The
assumptions used in computing the grant-date fair value are detailed in
Note 11 to our combined and consolidated financial statements, included in
this information statement. No stock options were exercised in 2009.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Column (g)
represents bonuses paid to the named executive officers. No bonuses
were paid for 2009 due to the temporary suspension of the bonus program in
response to the unprecedented global recession.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Column (h)
reflects the change in the actuarial present value of the named executive
officer’s pension and other postemployment benefits under respective
defined benefit retirement plans, from the plan measurement date used in
preparing the prior year combined and consolidated financial statements to
the plan measurement date used in preparing the current year combined and
consolidated financial statements, determined using the same interest
rate, mortality, and other actuarial assumptions used in our consolidated
financial statements. See the “Pension Benefits” table for more
information on the benefits payable to the named executive officers under
their respective pension plans. No amounts are presented for Mr. Shoshani
for 2007 because changes in actuarial assumptions reduced the present
value of his accumulated benefit by $222.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The named
executive officers also participate in the Vishay Intertechnology
nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which amounts deferred are
credited with earnings based on the performance of notional investment
options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited
during the years presented was “above market” or “preferential.”
Consequently, no deferred compensation plan earnings are included in the
amounts reported in Column (h). See the “Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation” table for more information on the benefits payable under the
nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
|
|
(7)
|
|
All other
compensation includes amounts deposited on behalf of each named executive
officer into Vishay Intertechnology’s nonqualified deferred compensation
plan pursuant to the employment agreements with each named executive
officer, personal use of company car, company match on 401(k)
contributions, benefits generally available to employees in Israel, and
other perquisites, as described below (asterisk denotes amounts paid in
foreign currency and translated at average exchange rates for the
year):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Company contribution to nonqualified
deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
|
15,638
|
|
|
12,871
|
|
|
9,537
|
|
Personal use of Company
car*
|
|
|
|
79,700
|
|
|
157,906
|
|
|
70,892
|
|
Israeli employment
benefits*
|
|
|
|
27,047
|
|
|
27,047
|
|
|
26,134
|
|
Medical and prescription drug insurance
premiums
|
|
|
$
|
222,385
|
|
$
|
297,824
|
|
$
|
206,563
|
|
|
|
William M. Clancy
|
|
$
|
4,697
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
Company contribution to nonqualified
deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
|
13,855
|
|
|
13,828
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Personal use of Company car
|
|
|
|
9,346
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
4,057
|
|
Company match to 401(k)
plan
|
|
|
|
20,763
|
|
|
19,264
|
|
|
18,641
|
|
Medical and prescription drug insurance
premiums
|
|
|
$
|
48,661
|
|
$
|
37,692
|
|
$
|
35,430
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Kieffer
|
|
$
|
6,063
|
|
$
|
5,070
|
|
$
|
6,467
|
|
Personal use of Company car
|
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
|
13,489
|
|
Company match to 401(k)
plan
|
|
|
|
16,228
|
|
|
15,563
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
Medical and prescription drug insurance
premiums
|
|
|
$
|
33,598
|
|
$
|
31,940
|
|
$
|
35,039
|
|
|
|
Grants of Plan Based
Awards
The following table
provides information with regard to plan based awards granted to each named
executive officer in 2009. The information included in the table should be read
in conjunction with the footnotes which follow and the description of Vishay
Intertechnology’s Senior Executive Phantom Stock Plan described in “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis.”
Name
|
Grant
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under
|
All Other Stock
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
Date
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
|
Awards: Number
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
(2)
|
of Shares of
|
and Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock or Units
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(i)
|
(l)
|
Ziv
|
1/2/2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5,000
|
$18,000
|
Shoshani
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/23/2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,000
|
$51,200
|
|
1/2/2009
|
-
|
$93,134
|
$129,778
|
-
|
-
|
William
|
1/2/2009
|
-
|
$49,084
|
$61,355
|
-
|
-
|
Clancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
|
1/2/2009
|
-
|
$47,114
|
$65,959
|
-
|
-
|
Kieffer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes awards of fully vested phantom
stock granted effective January 2, 2009 and awards of restricted stock
units granted effective April 23, 2009, which vest over time as described
in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End” table
below.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
For 2009, each executive officer was
eligible to earn an annual performance bonus based on the achievement of
corporate and individual performance goals, as described above for each
executive under “Performance bonus”. The maximum bonus Mr. Shoshani was
eligible to receive, assuming maximum achievement of each performance
goal, was 42.5% of his base salary. The maximum bonus Mr. Clancy was
eligible to receive, assuming maximum achievement of each performance
goal, was 30% of his base salary. The maximum bonus Mr. Kieffer was
eligible to receive, assuming maximum achievement of each performance
goal, was 35% of his base salary.
|
- 117
-
Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End
The following table provides
information regarding unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards
held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date (1)
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units
of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(2)
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
10/12/2000
|
|
12,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
25.13
|
|
10/12/2010
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2/27/2007
|
|
8,334
|
|
16,666
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
14.25
|
|
2/27/2017
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4/23/2009
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
$
|
55,678
|
Total
|
|
|
|
20,334
|
|
16,666
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
|
55,678
|
|
William M. Clancy
|
|
10/12/2000
|
|
12,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
25.13
|
|
10/12/2010
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P.
Kieffer
|
|
10/12/2000
|
|
6,000
|
|
6,000
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
25.13
|
|
10/12/2010
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Options granted
on February 27, 2007 vest in six equal annual installments beginning on
February 27, 2008. Options granted on October 12, 2000 vested in six equal
annual installments beginning on October 12, 2001.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Of the 10,000
RSUs granted on April 23, 2009, 1,665 vested immediately, and the
remainder will vest in five consecutive annual installments, as nearly
equal in size as possible, beginning on May 28,
2009.
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table
provides information with regard to amounts paid to or received by our named
executive officers during 2009 as a result of the exercise of stock options and
vesting of restricted stock units.
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized on
|
Name
|
|
Vesting (#)
|
|
Vesting
|
(a)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
3,332
|
|
$
|
17,693
|
Pension Benefits
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains various retirement benefit plans and arrangements.
As part of his
employment agreement, Mr. Shoshani and his surviving spouse are entitled to
receive medical coverage up to a $15,000 annual premium value for life. These
benefits are fully vested.
In the United States,
Vishay Intertechnology maintained a pension plan which provides defined benefits
to U.S. employees whose benefits under the qualified pension plan would be
limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the
Internal Revenue Code. This plan was contributory and, other than the fact that
it is nonqualified under ERISA, provides substantially the same benefits that
are available under Vishay Intertechnology’s qualified retirement plan.
Employees with five or more years of service were entitled to annual pension
benefits beginning at normal retirement age on the first day of the month
following the participant’s 65th birthday equal to the sum of 2.1% of the first
$10,000 of earnings plus 2.64% of the annual earnings in excess of $10,000 with
a new pension unit earned each year. The final pension is the sum of all units
earned during the employee’s career. The plan permits early retirement if the
participant is at least age 55 and has at least five years of service. Employees
may elect to receive their pension benefits in the form of a joint and survivor
annuity or other contingent annuities. Employees are 100% vested immediately in
their contributions. If employees terminate before rendering five years of
service, they forfeit the right to receive the portion of their accumulated plan
benefits attributable to Vishay Intertechnology’s contributions. Employees
receive their benefits as a life annuity payable monthly from retirement.
Payments will not be less than the greater of (a) the employee’s accumulated
contributions plus interest or (b) an annuity for five years. Effective January
1, 2009, the U.S. pension plans have been frozen. Benefits accumulated as of
December 31, 2008 will be paid to employees upon retirement, but no further
benefits will accrue beyond that date. To mitigate the loss in benefits of these
employees, effective January 1, 2009, Vishay Intertechnology increased the
company-match portion of its 401(k) defined contribution savings plan for
employees impacted by the pension freeze. Mr. Clancy is the only executive
officer that participates in this plan.
The following table
provides information regarding the present value of benefits accrued under these
retirement benefit plans and arrangements:
Name
(a)
|
|
Plan
Name
(b)
|
|
Number
of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
(c)
|
|
Present
Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit (1)
($)
(d)
|
|
Payments During
Last Fiscal
Year
($)
(e)
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
Individual contractual
|
|
n/a
|
|
$
|
36,569
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
postemployment medical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arrangement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M.
|
|
Vishay Nonqualified
|
|
13.5
|
|
$
|
185,719
|
|
$
|
-
|
Clancy
|
|
Retirement Plan (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These amounts
have been calculated using interest rate, mortality, and other actuarial
assumptions consistent with those used for financial reporting purposes
set forth in Note 10 to our combined and consolidated financial statements
included in this information statement.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Clancy elected to begin participating in this plan
effective July 1, 1995, and received no credit for prior service. The
Vishay Nonqualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2009,
such that participants accrued no additional
benefits.
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The named executive officers
participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which is available to
all employees which meet certain criteria under the Internal Revenue
Code. Mr. Shoshani is entitled under his employment agreement to
annual contributions by Vishay Intertechnology to this plan. The named executive
officers are also eligible to elect to defer additional amounts of compensation,
subject to certain limitations.
While deferred,
amounts are credited with “earnings” based on the performance of notional
investment options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited
during 2009 was “above market” or “preferential.”
The following table
sets forth information relating to the activity in the nonqualified deferred
compensation plan accounts of the named executive officers during 2009 and the
aggregate balance of the accounts as of December 31, 2009:
Name
(a)
|
|
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal
Year
($)
(b)
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal
Year (1)
($)
(c)
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last
Fiscal
Year
($)
(d)
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e)
|
|
Aggregate
Balance at
Last
Fiscal
Year End
($)
(f)
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
23,310
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
636,957
|
William M. Clancy
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
4,697
|
|
|
31,322
|
|
-
|
|
|
150,921
|
Thomas P. Kieffer
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
192
|
|
-
|
|
|
856,040
|
____________________
(1)
|
|
These amounts are
included in Column (i) of the “Summary Compensation Table” as a component
of “All Other Compensation.” No portion of the earnings credited during
2009 was “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, no amounts related
to earnings on deferred compensation have been included in the “Summary
Compensation Table.”
|
2010 Compensation from Vishay Precision
Group
The strategic affairs
and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology, with input from
management of Vishay Intertechnology and the advice of independent compensation
consultants referred to below, took the lead in crafting the initial
compensation arrangements with our executive officers. The committees negotiated
with Mr. Shoshani and his counsel and counsel for our company regarding his
arrangements, and Mr. Shoshani, in his capacity as our principal executive
officer, also had substantial input on the compensation of our other two
executive officers. The strategic affairs committee was involved in these
compensation matters because of the potential conflicts of interest in setting
the compensation principally of Mr. Shoshani. Mr. Shoshani is related to Dr.
Felix Zandman, the executive chairman of the board of directors of Vishay
Intertechnology, who will control approximately 45% of the outstanding voting
power of our company following the separation. We anticipate that, prior to the
distribution date, each of our executive officers will execute a letter of
understanding with us and Vishay Intertechnology regarding their compensation as
described in this section. The terms of the employment of the executive officers
will be finalized as soon as practicable following the distribution date with
the compensation committee of our board of directors. We anticipate that at that
time Mr. Shoshani will enter into an employment agreement that he will negotiate
with the committee. Until the distribution date, each of the executive officers
will remain subject to his existing employment arrangements with Vishay
Intertechnology or its subsidiaries. Upon entering into an employment agreement
with our company, Mr. Shoshani’s existing employment agreement will terminate on
the spin-off date.
Compensation Consultants
To assist in
formulating the initial compensation arrangements of our executive officers, the
strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology retained
the services of two compensation consulting firms, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(“PwC”) and Farient Advisors LLC. These compensation consultants were engaged
directly by the committees, although in the course of their engagement they also
met with Mr. Shoshani and members of the management of Vishay Intertechnology to
obtain their input and views. The consultants’ assignment included assisting the
committees in the formulation of the compensation arrangements for our executive
officers, particularly for Mr. Shoshani, assessing the reasonableness and
interrelation of the individual elements of the compensation packages and
providing input to the committees with respect to current compensation practices
among comparable public companies and in comparable transactions. PwC has been
previously engaged by the Vishay Intertechnology compensation committee to
assist it in executive compensation matters, including the 2009 amendment to Dr.
Zandman’s employment agreement. Farient was recommended to the committees by
management of Vishay Intertechnology.
Compensation Philosophy
In formulating
the compensation arrangements for our executive officers, the strategic affairs
and compensation committees of Vishay Intertechnology were guided generally by
the executive compensation philosophy employed by the Vishay Intertechnology
compensation committee with respect to the executive compensation of that
company. The committees believed that the compensation packages should combine
base salary with an opportunity for annual cash bonuses and also include
long-term equity awards designed to align the interests of senior management
with the long-term interests of the company’s stockholders. In crafting the
compensation of our executive officers, however, the committees also took
account of the fact that at the time of the distribution we will be a
substantially smaller company than our current parent. The committees, with
advice from management, also believed that the executives should receive
recognition for the substantial efforts that they invested in preparation for
the spin-off, in the form of founder’s equity grants that align executive
interests with those of stockholders in achieving long-term growth in our
company’s equity value. Finally, in the case of Mr. Shoshani, in order to induce
him to join our company, the committees felt that it was appropriate to
compensate Mr. Shoshani in part in respect of the future opportunities with
Vishay Intertechnology that he will forgo when he joins our company. The
committees believe that the elements of compensation negotiated with our
executives will reward intrinsically sound management decisions and will not
encourage risk-taking to enhance short-term profitability at the expense of the
long-term health and viability of our company. As discussed above, the
compensation committee did not set compensation for Vishay Intertechnology
executives within a specific range of compensation data. The strategic affairs
and compensation committees, in setting compensation for our company’s executive
officers, did set such compensation within a specific range of compensation
data, as discussed below.
Elements of
Compensation
Base
Salaries
. After considering the salaries and compensation practices
of executive officers of comparable public companies identified by the
compensation consultants, the executive officers’ base salaries were based on a
determination by the committees that it was appropriate to establish such
salaries within the market-competitive range of compensation offered to
similarly situated executives of comparable public companies. The
committees determined that establishing the salaries within the range of
salaries for similarly situated executives at comparable public companies would
meet their fairness and competitive goals for our executive officers’
salaries. The committees therefore set the base salaries for each of our
executive officers within the market-competitive range for their respective
positions.
Based
on input from the compensation consultants referred to above, the
market-competitive ranges were determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles of
compensation data for such comparable companies.
These ranges were:
$367,000 to $463,000 for the chief executive officer; $216,000 to $259,000 for
the chief financial officer; and $192,000 to $307,000 for the chief technology
officer.
The committees believed
that setting our executive officers’ salaries within such ranges was appropriate
to induce the executive officers to join our company and to retain them for the
desired period. In addition to the previously identified factors, the
executive officers’ salary increases also reflected consideration of their
performance and the increased responsibilities in connection with their new
positions at our company. With respect to Mr. Shoshani, the committees
concluded that his salary was appropriate in light of the future opportunities
he will forgo when he joins our company. Therefore, Mr. Shoshani’s base
salary accounted for his prior and potential salary with Vishay Intertechnology,
and his demonstrated ability to run our company and serve as our chief executive
officer.
The variations in base
salary of each of our executive officers were established to compensate each of
them at the appropriate market-competitive level according to their respective
positions, duties and responsibilities.
Performance
Bonus
. The committees also considered the annual bonuses paid to
executive officers of the comparable public companies identified by the
compensation consultants in determining the appropriate target bonuses for our
executive officers. In establishing the target bonuses, the committees
determined that it was appropriate to set such target bonuses within the
market-competitive range of bonuses granted by such comparable public
companies. Similar to base salary, the committees believed that such
target bonuses were necessary to attract the executive officers to our company
and retain them during the desired period. Additionally, the committees
set the target bonuses at levels that it concluded would not encourage excessive
risk-taking in light of the applicable performance goals and that it considered
appropriate to compensate each executive officer in connection with their
different responsibilities at our company. The target bonuses of each of
our executive officers were established to compensative each of them at the
appropriate market-competitive level according to their respective positions,
duties and responsibilities.
The performance
bonuses for the executive officers of Vishay Precision Group for 2010 are based
on achievement of two corporate objectives, consisting of our adjusted operating
margin (as defined above) and our EBITDA (earnings determined in accordance with
GAAP, before interest expense (income), income tax expense (benefit),
depreciation and amortization). The target levels of adjusted operating
margin and EBITDA for 2010 are $18 million and $28 million, respectively, and
one-half of the bonus potential for each executive officer is attributable to
the achievement of each of these performance objectives. Individual bonus
terms are discussed with respect to each of our executive officers below, under
“Employment Terms.”
Equity
Compensation
. The committees believed that the grant of equity
awards was the primary component for aligning the interests of the executive
officers with the long-term interests of the company’s stockholders.
Accordingly, the committees considered the extent to which the grant of equity
awards would reward each executive officer for increasing stockholder value and
such executive officer’s role in our company’s performance.
In establishing the amount
of equity awards, the committees utilized the market-competitive range of equity
awards granted to similarly situated executive officers of comparable public
companies. The committees concluded that a grant of equity awards within
such market-competitive range was appropriate to reward and incentivize our
executive officers. The amount of equity awards granted to each of our
executive officers was further determined suitable in light of the specific
positions, duties and responsibilities of each executive officer. The
equity awards provided to each of our executive officers were established to
compensate each of them at the appropriate market-competitive medial level
according to their respective positions, duties and responsibilities, as well as
to recognize their individual ability to affect stockholder value
creation.
In recognition for the substantial efforts that our executives officers
invested in preparation for the spin-off, the committees determined award
founder’s equity grants to the executives, which serve to align their interests
with those of stockholders in achieving long-term growth in our company’s equity
value.
Total
Compensation
. In determining the total compensation for our
executive officers, the committees considered the compensation packages given to
similarly situated executive officers of comparable public companies. The
committees believed that it was appropriate to offer total compensation to our
executive officers within the market-competitive range of total
compensation provided by such comparable public companies.
Based
on input from the compensation consultants referred to above, the
market-competitive ranges were determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles of
compensation data for such comparable companies.
These ranges were:
$956,000 to $1,418,000 for the chief executive officer; $431,000 to $713,000 for
the chief financial officer; and $272,000 to $602,000 for the chief technology
officer. Consistent with the compensation philosophy of Vishay Intertechnology,
the total compensation package for each of our executive officers was
established by balancing base salary against target bonus and equity
compensation. The committees concluded that the total compensation packages
properly balanced base salary against annual bonus and equity grants such that
the total compensation would not encourage excessive risk-taking by our
executive officers.
Employment Terms
The following terms
of employment have been agreed to among our executive officers and Vishay
Intertechnology and us. Vishay Intertechnology acted in each case upon the
recommendations of its strategic affairs and compensation committees. At this
time, none of our executive officers have entered into employment contracts with
us, although Mr. Shoshani is expected to enter into a three-year employment
agreement as soon as practicable following the distribution date. Accordingly,
the arrangements described below are subject to review by the compensation
committee of our board of directors following the distribution date, and the
terms described could change. However, we do not anticipate that any changes, if
made, will be material.
Ziv Shoshani
Mr. Shoshani will be
employed as the President and Chief Executive Officer of our company and,
following the distribution date, will enter into an employment contract for a
term of three years.
Cash compensation
. Mr. Shoshani will receive a base salary of
$420,000, payable in Israeli currency based on the average exchange rate during
the preceding calendar year. In addition, Mr. Shoshani will be eligible for an
annual cash performance bonus of up to 200% of base salary. As described
above, the two performance metrics for 2010 include adjusted operating margin
and EBITDA, with each of the performance metrics accounting for one-half of Mr.
Shoshani’s bonus potential. For each performance metric, Mr. Shoshani
would not be eligible to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than
80% of target. If actual achievement of a performance metric were exactly
80% of target, Mr. Shoshani would be eligible to receive 50% of his maximum
bonus potential with respect to that performance metric. If actual
achievement of a performance metric were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr.
Shoshani would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with
respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 50% to 75% of the
maximum bonus potential for that performance metric. Finally, if actual
achievement of a performance metric were between 100% and 150% of target, Mr.
Shoshani would be eligible to receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with
respect to that performance metric, increasing ratably from 75% to 200% of the
maximum bonus potential for that performance metric. The amount of bonus payable
to Mr. Shoshani will be determined by our compensation committee following the
end of the year, based on the level of achievement of the performance
objectives.
Equity compensation
. Mr. Shoshani will be eligible for an annual
long-term equity incentive award with a target value equal to 100% of base
salary. The form of the annual equity award will be as determined by our
compensation committee. Mr. Shoshani will also receive a founder’s equity grant
having a total value of $800,000. The grant will take the form of restricted
stock units (RSUs), all of which will vest three years from the distribution
date. The RSUs will also vest on a change of control and in certain other
circumstances to be determined by our compensation committee. The number of
shares subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the
founder
’
s
equity grant by the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for
the 10 consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
Special bonuses
. Mr. Shoshani will receive from us a cash
sign-on bonus of $400,000 upon the successful completion of the
spin-off. Mr. Shoshani will be obligated to repay this bonus if he terminates
his employment with us during the initial three-year term of his employment
contract, other than termination for good reason, death or disability. Mr.
Shoshani will also receive a one-time cash bonus from Vishay Intertechnology in
the amount of $600,000 upon the successful completion of the spin-off. Corporate
or individual performance following the spin-off will not affect Mr.
Shoshani
’
s
right to receive or retain this special bonus from Vishay
Intertechnology.
Severance
. If Mr. Shoshani’s employment is terminated
without cause or if he terminates his employment with us for good reason, he
will be entitled to receive cash severance in an amount equal to two years’ base
salary plus a prorated amount of this target bonus for the year of termination.
Mr. Shoshani will also be entitled to a customary continuation of benefits. Mr.
Shoshani will not be entitled to a tax gross-up in respect of any parachute
payment tax imposed on his severance benefits, and, if a tax of this nature
would otherwise be imposed, the severance payments will be cut back to the
extent necessary to avoid this tax.
Other
. Mr. Shoshani will be entitled to such other
benefits, including retirement benefits, as may be approved by our compensation
committee following the distribution date. He will also be subject to a
customary non-competition agreement for a period of two years following
termination of his employment with us. “Cause,” “good reason” and “change of
control” will be as defined in Mr. Shoshani’s employment agreement.
Mr. Shoshani will
also be entitled to receive certain benefits generally available to employees in
Israel on a non-discriminatory basis. For a description of these benefits, see
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Ziv Shoshani” above.
William M. Clancy
Mr. Clancy will be
employed as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Cash compensation
. Mr. Clancy will receive a base salary of
$250,000. In addition, Mr. Clancy will be eligible for an annual cash
performance bonus of up to 80% of base salary. As described above, the two
performance metrics for 2010 include adjusted operating margin and EBITDA, with
each of the performance metrics accounting for one-half of Mr. Clancy’s bonus
potential. For each performance metric, Mr. Clancy would not be eligible
to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than 80% of target. If
actual achievement of a performance metric were exactly 80% of target, Mr.
Clancy would be eligible to receive 26.7% of his maximum bonus potential with
respect to that performance metric. If actual achievement of a performance
metric were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to
receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance
metric, increasing ratably from 26.7% to 40% of the maximum bonus potential for
that performance metric. Finally, if actual achievement of a performance
metric were between 100% and 150% of target, Mr. Clancy would be eligible to
receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance
metric, increasing ratably from 40% to 80% of the maximum bonus potential for
that performance metric. The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Clancy will be
determined by our compensation committee following the end of the year, based on
the level of achievement of the performance objectives.
Equity compensation
. Mr. Clancy will be eligible for an annual
long-term equity incentive award with a target value equal to 40% of base
salary. The form of the annual equity award will be as determined by our
compensation committee. Mr. Clancy will also receive a founder’s equity grant
having a total value of $100,000. The grant will take the form of RSUs, all of
which will vest three years from the distribution date. The number of shares
subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the founder’s
equity grant by the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for
the 10 consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
Thomas P. Kieffer
Mr. Kieffer will be
employed as our Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer.
Cash compensation
. Mr. Kieffer will receive a base salary of
$225,000. In addition, Mr. Kieffer will be eligible for an annual cash
performance bonus of up to 60% of base salary. As described above, the two
performance metrics for 2010 include adjusted operating margin and EBITDA, with
each of the performance metrics accounting for one-half of Mr. Kieffer’s bonus
potential. For each performance metric, Mr. Kieffer would not be eligible
to receive a bonus if actual performance were less than 80% of target. If
actual achievement of a performance metric were exactly 80% of target, Mr.
Kieffer would be eligible to receive 20% of his maximum bonus potential with
respect to that performance metric. If actual achievement of a performance
metric were between 80% and 100% of target, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to
receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance
metric, increasing ratably from 20% to 30% of the maximum bonus potential for
that performance metric. Finally, if actual achievement of a performance
metric were between 100% and 150% of target, Mr. Kieffer would be eligible to
receive a percentage of his maximum bonus with respect to that performance
metric, increasing ratably from 30% to 60% of the maximum bonus potential for
that performance metric. The amount of bonus payable to Mr. Kieffer will be
determined by our compensation committee following the end of the year, based on
the level of achievement of the performance objectives.
Equity compensation
. Mr. Kieffer will be eligible for an annual
long-term equity incentive award with a target value equal to 30% of base
salary. The form of the annual equity award will be as determined by our
compensation committee. Mr. Kieffer will also receive a founder’s equity grant
having a total value of $100,000. The grant will take the form of RSUs, all of
which will vest three years from the distribution date. The number of shares
subject to the RSUs will be determined by dividing the value of the founder
’
s equity grant by
the average of the daily closing price of our common stock for the 10
consecutive trading days following the distribution date.
- 125 -
Other Compensation Considerations
Tax deductibility of executive compensation
Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code limits to $1 million the annual tax deduction for
compensation paid to each of the chief executive officer and any of the other
three highest paid executive officers. However, compensation that qualifies as
performance-based compensation is deductible even in excess of $1 million. In
connection with the formulation of the compensation arrangements for our
executive officers, the strategic affairs and compensation committees of Vishay
Intertechnology reviewed and considered the deductibility of executive
compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, and we anticipate that our
compensation committee will do the same after it is established.
In certain
situations, our compensation committee may approve compensation that will not
satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m), in order to ensure competitive
levels of total compensation for its executive officers. Some of Mr. Shoshani’s
compensation for 2010 may not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m).
Nonqualified deferred compensation
On October 22, 2004,
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law, adding Section 409A
to the Internal Revenue Code, which changed the tax rules applicable to
nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. A violation of these new rules
could result in the imposition of a 20% penalty tax on the affected executives.
We believe that we are operating in compliance with Section 409A. We anticipate
that our compensation committee will monitor compliance with Section 409A.
Perquisites
Our compensation
committee is expected to follow a policy on providing perquisites to our
executive officers similar to the policy of Vishay Intertechnology. See
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components” above.
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive
Program
As discussed, we
anticipate that equity compensation will be a component of our executive
compensation structure. We are therefore adopting with the approval of Vishay
Intertechnology, as our sole stockholder, the Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010
Stock Incentive Program (the “2010 Program”). The following is a summary of
certain aspects of the 2010 Program, but it is qualified by reference to the
full text of the program which is filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this information statement is a part.
Administration
The 2010 Program will
be administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors. It is
intended that the members of our compensation committee always will be
“non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” within the meaning of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, but no award under the program will be
invalidated if the compensation committee is not so constituted. If our board of
directors so determines, the board may act as the compensation committee for
purposes of administering the 2010 Program. Also, the board of directors will
administer the 2010 Program with respect to awards granted to non-employee
directors. The compensation committee will have the authority to determine the
individuals to whom awards will be granted and the terms and provisions of the
awards; to exercise all of the powers granted to it under the 2010 Program; to
construe, interpret and implement the 2010 Program and all related agreements;
to prescribe, amend, and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2010
Program, including rules governing its own operations; to make all
determinations necessary or advisable in administering the 2010 Program; to
correct any defect or omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the 2010
Program; and to amend the 2010 Program to reflect changes in applicable
law.
Eligibility
Officers and other
employees of Vishay Precision Group or a majority-owned subsidiary who are
responsible for or contribute to the management, growth, and profitability of
the business of our company are eligible to receive grants under the 2010
Program.
Maximum number of shares
Awards representing
up to 500,000 shares of our common stock may be granted under the 2010
Program. The number of shares authorized for grant under the 2010 Program will
approximate 4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock on the spin-off
date. This number will be adjusted for changes in our capital structure, such as
a stock split or stock dividend. Awards that are forfeited by a holder may be
re-granted to others, subject to the overall limit. No individual may be granted
awards in any one year representing more than 250,000 shares of our common
stock.
- 127 -
Type of Awards
The 2010 Program
permits the granting of—
-
nonqualified stock options and, in
the case of employees who are nonresident foreign nationals, stock
appreciation rights that are payable in cash;
-
unrestricted stock;
-
restricted stock; and
-
stock units, including restricted
stock units (RSUs) and phantom stock units.
Stock options
. Stock options will be exercisable at such
times and for such prices as determined by the compensation committee. However,
the exercise price of a stock option may not be less than the fair market value
of the common stock on the date of the grant. Options will expire on a date
determined by our compensation committee at the time of grant but in no event
later than ten years from the date of grant. Upon holder’s termination of
employment, generally, unvested stock options will expire immediately and vested
options will expire shortly after the termination of employment.
Unrestricted stock
. The compensation committee may grant (or
sell at a purchase price at least equal to par value) shares of common stock
free of restrictions. Unrestricted stock may be granted as part of another
award, for example as an immediately vested component of a restricted stock or
stock unit grant.
Restricted stock
. Restricted stock is subject to vesting based
on continued employment with our company and/or upon the achievement of specific
performance goals. Prior to vesting, the shares of restricted stock, are not
transferable and are forfeitable. The compensation committee may at the time
that shares of restricted stock are granted impose additional conditions to the
vesting of the shares. Generally, unvested shares of restricted stock and any
dividends paid on those shares are automatically and immediately forfeited upon
the grant recipient’s termination of employment for any reason.
Stock units.
A stock unit entitles the recipient to receive
a share of common stock on a specified date or the occurrence of a specified
event such as termination of employment. Stock units may be subject to vesting,
in which case they are commonly referred to as restricted stock units or RSUs,
or they may be fully vested at the time of grant, in which case they are
sometimes referred to as phantom stock. Vesting of stock units may be based on
continued employment with the company and/or upon the achievement of specific
performance goals. The compensation committee may at the time that stock units
are granted impose additional conditions to the vesting of the stock units.
Generally, unvested stock units are forfeited upon the grant recipient’s
termination of employment for any reason.
- 128 -
Performance goals
The compensation
committee may provide that the grant or vesting schedule of an award of stock
options, unrestricted stock, phantom stock, restricted stock or stock units is
based or partially based on the achievement of specified performance goals.
Stock units whose vesting depends on the achievement of performance goals are
sometimes referred to as performance stock units or PSUs.
The performance goals
may be expressed in terms of one or more of the following criteria: earnings;
adjusted net income (or correlative terms); adjusted operating margin (or
correlative terms); gross or net sales; cash flow; financial return ratios;
total stockholder return; stockholder return based on growth measures or the
attainment by our common stock of a specified value for a specified period of
time; share price or share price appreciation; value of assets, return or net
return on assets, net assets or capital; adjusted pretax margin; margins,
profits and expense levels; dividends; market share, market penetration or other
performance measures with respect to specific designated products or product
groups and/or specific geographic areas; reduction of losses, loss ratios or
expense ratios; reduction in fixed costs; operating cost management; cost of
capital; debt reduction; productivity improvements; inventory turnover
measurements; or customer satisfaction, based on specified objective goals or a
company-sponsored customer survey.
Performance goals may
be expressed with respect to the company as a whole or with respect to one or
more divisions or business units; on a pretax or after-tax basis; and on an
absolute per share and/or relative basis. In addition, performance goals may
employ comparisons with past performance of our company and/or the current or
past performance of other companies, and in the case of earnings-based measures,
may employ comparisons to capital, stockholders’ equity and shares
outstanding.
Treatment of Outstanding Vishay Intertechnology Equity
Awards
For a discussion of
the treatment in the spin-off of outstanding equity awards of Vishay
Intertechnology held by our officers and employees, see “Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions – Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology –
Employee Matters Agreement – Equity Awards” below.
- 129 -
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS
Vishay
Intertechnology currently owns all of our outstanding shares of common stock.
Upon completion of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will not beneficially
own any shares of our common stock. None of our directors or executive officers
currently owns any shares of our common stock, but those who own shares of
Vishay Intertechnology will be treated the same as other holders of Vishay
Intertechnology common stock in any distribution by Vishay Intertechnology and,
accordingly, will receive shares of our common stock in the
distribution.
The following table sets forth the
anticipated beneficial ownership of our common stock and Class B common stock by
each of our current directors and our directors following the spin-off; each of
our executive officers following the spin-off; all of our directors and
executive officers following the spin-off as a group; and each of our
stockholders who we believe (based on the assumptions described below) will
beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or Class B common
stock. Except as otherwise noted below, we based the share amounts on each
person’s beneficial ownership of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay
Intertechnology Class B common stock on June 18, 2010, giving effect to a
distribution ratio of one share of our common stock for every 14 shares of
Vishay Intertechnology common stock and one share of our Class B common stock
for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock held by
such person. In general, “beneficial ownership” includes those shares a
director, director nominee or executive officer has the power to vote, acquire
or dispose within 60 days. Except as otherwise noted, the persons named in the
table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the
shares shown as beneficially owned by them.
Immediately following the spin-off,
we estimate that 12.3 million shares of our common stock and 1.0
million of our Class B common stock will be issued and outstanding, based on the
number of shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock and Vishay
Intertechnology Class B common stock expected to be outstanding as of the record
date. The actual number of shares of our common stock outstanding following the
spin-off will be determined on June 25, 2010, the record date for the
spin-off.
- 130 -
|
Common Stock
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Voting
|
Name
|
Stock
|
|
Class
|
|
Stock
|
|
Class
|
|
Power
|
Directors and Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Zandman (1)
|
543
|
|
*
|
|
|
106
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ziv Shoshani
|
6,241
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
Samuel Broydo
|
-
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
Saul V. Reibstein
|
-
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
Timothy V. Talbert
|
71
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
William M. Clancy
|
-
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas P. Kieffer
|
2,004
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Lior Yahalomi (2)
|
-
|
|
*
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as
a group (8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c/o
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
|
8,859
|
|
*
|
|
|
106
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
3
Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Felix Zandman (3)
|
3,010
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,018,663
|
|
99.4
|
%
|
|
45.2
|
%
|
c/o
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Lancaster Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSV Asset Management (4)
|
674,554
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
1 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Inc. (5)
|
1,302,024
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
(6)
|
1,118,921
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
One Wall Street, 31st Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 131 -
*
|
|
Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of such class or
the total voting power, as the case may be.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 53 shares of our Class B common stock anticipated to
be directly owned by Marc Zandman and 53 shares of our Class B common
stock anticipated to be owned by Marc Zandman’s minor child.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Dr.
Yahalomi will resign from our board of directors immediately prior to the
spin-off.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 44,052 shares of our Class B common stock anticipated
to be directly owned by Dr. Felix Zandman; 571,435 shares anticipated
to be held in family trusts, of which Dr. Zandman is the trustee and over
which Dr. Zandman shares voting and dispositive control with his wife,
Mrs. Ruta Zandman; and 403,176 shares anticipated to be held in a
voting trust, of which Dr. Zandman is the trustee and over which Dr.
Zandman has sole voting control. The shares held in the voting trust
consist of 223,862 shares anticipated to be deposited by the Estate
of Mrs. Luella B. Slaner and 179,314 shares anticipated to be
deposited by Mrs. Slaner’s children and various trusts for the benefit of
Mrs. Slaner’s children and grandchildren. The voting trust agreement that
governs the voting trust will remain in effect until the earlier of (x)
February 1, 2050 or (y) the death or resignation or inability to act of
Dr. Zandman, but will terminate at any earlier time upon the due execution
and acknowledgment by the trustee of a deed of termination, duly filed
with the registered office of Vishay Intertechnology.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Based
on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2010 by
LSV Asset Management. According to the Schedule 13G, LSV Asset Management
is expected to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect
to 674,554 shares of common stock; and sole power to dispose or
direct the disposition with respect to 674,554 shares.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Based
on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on January 7, 2010 by
BlackRock, Inc. According to the Schedule 13G, BlackRock, Inc. is expected
to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect
to 1,302,024 shares of common stock; sole power to dispose or direct
the disposition with respect to 1,302,024 shares.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Based
on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 4, 2010 by The
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. According to the Schedule 13G,
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation is expected to have sole power to
vote or direct the vote with respect to 1,008,074 shares of common
stock, and shared power to vote or direct the vote with respect
to 201 shares; and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition
with respect to 1,096,786 shares, and shared power to dispose or
direct the disposition with respect to 427
shares.
|
- 132 -
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology
Following the
spin-off, our company and Vishay Intertechnology will operate separately, each
as independent public companies. In order to govern the relationship between our
company and Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off and to provide mechanisms
for an orderly transition, we and Vishay Intertechnology are entering into
certain agreements which will facilitate the spin-off, govern our relationship
with Vishay Intertechnology after the spin-off and provide for the allocation of
employee benefits, tax and other liabilities and obligations. The following is a
summary of the terms of the material agreements we are entering into with Vishay
Intertechnology prior to the spin-off.
Master Separation Agreement
The master separation
agreement will govern our separation from Vishay Intertechnology, the
distribution of shares of our common stock and Class B common stock to Vishay
Intertechnology stockholders and other matters related to Vishay
Intertechnology’s relationship with us. References in this section to Vishay
Intertechnology and us include the parties’ respective subsidiaries as they will
exist following the separation. References in this section to ancillary
agreements refer to the tax matters agreement, the trademark license agreement,
the employee matters agreement, the lease agreements, the transition services
agreements, the secondment agreement, the patent license agreement, and the
supply agreements, each of which is described below, as well as other agreements
between us and Vishay Intertechnology.
The Separation
In a series of
transactions, Vishay Intertechnology has moved and is continuing to move to us
its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses, including assets and
equity interests of certain subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology, and we have
moved and are continuing to move a small amount of assets that we hold and that
do not constitute part of our business to Vishay Intertechnology. The master
separation agreement provides that the parties will complete these transactions,
will effect certain capital allocation transactions whereby our debt and equity
capital upon closing of the separation will be as set forth in this information
statement, and will otherwise take all actions necessary to implement our
separation from Vishay Intertechnology as described in this information
statement. We will agree to accept the assets and equity interests transferred
to us. Except as specified in the master separation agreement, we will assume
and perform all of the liabilities (including contingent liabilities) and
obligations arising under or relating to the operation of the precision
measurement and foil resistor businesses or the assets and equity interests that
are transferred to us as part of the separation, whether incurred before or
after the separation.
If either we or
Vishay Intertechnology receives any asset that according to the master
separation agreement or any ancillary agreement was allocated to the other
party, the parties will cooperate to cause the asset to be transferred to the
party that is entitled to it. If by mistake or omission any assets are
transferred or retained by a party, or if by mistake or omission any liabilities
were assumed by us or we failed to assume any liabilities, the parties will
cooperate in good faith to transfer or retransfer the misallocated assets or to
effect the assumption or reassumption of the misallocated liabilities to the
appropriate party. The parties will reimburse each other or make another
financial adjustment to remedy any such mistakes or omissions.
If any asset intended
to be transferred to us under the master separation agreement cannot be
transferred for any reason prior to the separation, for example because of any
required consent or governmental approval, the party retaining the asset will
hold it for the benefit of the other party insofar as possible, and the parties
will take action insofar as reasonably possible so that the benefit and burdens
relating to the asset will inure to the appropriate party, until such time as
the asset can be transferred.
Each
party, with the other’s reasonable best cooperation, will use reasonable efforts
to obtain novation of, or assign all rights and obligations under, all contracts
and other obligations or liabilities that such party has agreed to assume under
the master separation agreement, so that the party that has agreed to assume
such obligations and liabilities is solely responsible for them. If
there is any contract that is shared by Vishay Intertechnology and us, each
party, with the reasonable best cooperation of the other, will take action to
replace the contract with two separate contracts. However, neither we
nor Vishay Intertechnology will be under any obligation to pay any consideration
or assume additional liabilities for these purposes.
The
parties will agree to execute all necessary documentation to evidence the
transfer of assets and the assumption of liabilities in accordance with the
separation.
The
master separation agreement also provides that we and Vishay Intertechnology
will terminate, as of the closing of the separation, all contracts between us,
including all accounts payable and receivable, except as specified in the
agreement.
Upon
our reasonable request, Vishay Intertechnology will use its reasonable best
efforts to obtain from third parties the release of any security interest
granted by Vishay Intertechnology on any of our assets. Borrowings under the
Vishay Intertechnology credit facility have historically been secured
by certain of our assets in the United States, and pledges of stock of certain
of our subsidiaries. Effective June 11, 2010, Vishay
Intertechnology entered into an amendment to its credit facility which
releases this collateral. We are not aware of any other security interest
granted by Vishay Intertechnology on any of our assets.
Neither
we nor Vishay Intertechnology will make any representation or warranty as to the
assets or liabilities transferred or assumed, the value or freedom from any lien
or other security interest of any assets transferred, the absence of any
defenses relating to any claim of either party or the legal sufficiency of any
conveyance documents or as to any consents or governmental approvals which may
be required in connection with the transfers. Except as expressly set forth in
the master separation agreement or in any ancillary agreement, all assets will
be transferred on an “as is,” “where is” basis. The absence of representations
and warranties and the “as is, where is” nature of the spin-off is customary for
transactions of this nature, in which we are acquiring all of our assets,
subject to specified liabilities being assumed, without paying a fair market
value purchase price. These characteristics of the spin-off may be
considered to be unfavorable to us in comparison to the types of contractual
protections we might be expected to receive from a seller if we were instead
purchasing all of our assets from Vishay Intertechnology in an arms-length
negotiated transaction.
Shortly
following the distribution date, we will deliver to Vishay Intertechnology a
statement setting forth our calculation of our net cash. We will
provide Vishay Intertechnology with access to our records and employees to
permit Vishay Intertechnology to evaluate such
calculation. Disagreements as to our calculation of net cash will be
referred to KPMG LLP for final and binding resolution. Depending on
whether our net cash is less than or exceeds specified thresholds set forth in
the master separation agreement, an adjustment will be made following the
distribution date pursuant to which one party will make a payment to the other
in the amount of the difference.
The
Distribution
We
and Vishay Intertechnology will agree to use reasonable best efforts to
consummate the distribution. Among other things, the master
separation agreement will require the parties to cooperate in respect of the
separation and capital allocation transactions described above; cause the Form
10 registration statement of which this information statement forms a part to
become and continue to be effective; distribute this information statement to
Vishay Intertechnology stockholders; take any necessary action under state
securities laws; list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange; effect
appropriate accounting allocations; and take various actions relating to our
corporate governance following the separation. The obligations of the
parties to effect the separation and distribution are subject to various
conditions set forth in the master separation agreement and summarized elsewhere
in this information statement.
The
master separation agreement provides that Vishay Intertechnology will have sole
discretion whether to proceed with the distribution, whether to modify any of
its terms, including the terms described in this information statement, and to
determine the timing and conditions of the distribution.
In
accordance with the terms of the master separation agreement, we will appoint a
registrar and transfer agent for the purpose of recording the ownership of our
common stock and Class B common stock. On or prior to the
distribution date, we will issue to Vishay Intertechnology, and Vishay
Intertechnology will electronically deliver to the distribution agent, a
sufficient number of shares of our common stock and Class B common stock for
distribution to Vishay Intertechnology stockholders on the distribution
date. On the distribution date, the record holders of Vishay
Intertechnology common stock and Class B common stock as of the record date will
be entitled to receive shares of our common stock and Class B common stock,
respectively, in accordance with the respective distribution
ratios. Promptly following the distribution date, the registrar and
transfer agent will send to each of our stockholders of record an account
statement showing the number of shares that they hold as of the distribution
date. Fractional shares will not be issued, and instead, holders will
receive cash, as described elsewhere in this information statement.
Additional
Covenants
We
and Vishay Intertechnology each will agree to provide each other after the
separation with corporate books and records of the other in its
possession. We and Vishay Intertechnology will also provide further
assurance of execution and delivery of other documentation as necessary or
desirable to effect the purposes of the master separation
agreement.
We
and Vishay Intertechnology will provide each other with information reasonably
needed to comply with reporting, disclosure or filing requirements of
governmental authorities; for use in judicial, regulatory, administrative and
other proceedings or to satisfy audit, accounting, claims, regulatory litigation
or similar requirements (other than claims or allegations that one party has
against the other); to comply with obligations under the master separation
agreement and ancillary agreements; for the preparation of required financial
statements or completing an audit; for use in compensation, benefit or welfare
plan administration or other bona fide business purposes; or to conduct ongoing
business. The parties will agree to make their respective personnel
available during normal business hours to discuss information that is
exchanged. Each party will use commercially reasonable efforts to
cooperate with respect to the other’s financial reporting and audit obligations.
Further, each party also will agree to use reasonable best efforts to retain
information related to the precision measurement and foil resistor businesses in
its possession or control in accordance with its retention policies as in effect
immediately prior to the distribution date and other such policies.
Except
in the case of adversarial actions by the parties against each other, each party
will agree to use its reasonable best efforts to make available to the other
party its current, former and future directors, officers, employees and other
personnel or agents who may be used as witnesses and books, records and other
documents which may reasonably be required in connection with legal
actions.
Subject
to customary exceptions, the parties will agree to hold in strict confidence and
not to disclose without the other party’s written consent, the confidential
information of the other party. Each party will have sole authority
to determine whether to assert or waive attorney-client, work product or other
privileges with respect to its own information.
Cooperation
with Respect to Know-how
We
and Vishay Intertechnology will agree that if one party reasonably believes that
the other may have an expectation of ownership in know-how or other technical
information that has come to the attention of the personnel of the first party
and that the first party proposes to utilize in its business, the first party
will be required to bring this to the attention of the other. We and
Vishay Intertechnology will agree to each designate at least one individual at a
level equal to or above divisional P&L leader to discuss our respective
rights to such know-how or information and to discuss requests from one party to
the other for a license to utilize such information. Such license
requests must be considered in good faith by the other party; however, nothing
will require either party to enter into such a license.
Exchangeable
Notes and Warrants
We
will further agree to issue notes exchangeable for shares of our common stock to
such persons, in such amounts, upon such terms and at such time as required by
the put and call agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and the holders of the
notes due December 13, 2102, to issue warrants to acquire our common stock to
such persons, in such amounts, upon such terms and at such time as required by
the warrant agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and American Stock Transfer
and Trust Company; and to register the shares of VPG common stock issuable upon
exchange of the exchangeable notes or exercise of the warrants on a resale
registration statement on such terms and within such time periods as required by
a securities investment and registration rights agreement to which Vishay
Intertechnology is subject.
Release
of Claims and Indemnification
We
and Vishay Intertechnology each will agree to release each other and each
other’s respective current and former directors, officers, managers, agents,
security holders, advisors, accountants, attorneys and other representatives
from all liabilities existing or arising from any acts or events occurring or
failing to occur on or before the distribution date. These releases will be
subject to certain exceptions, including claims arising under the master
separation agreement and the ancillary agreements; any specified liabilities;
any liability assumed by a party pursuant to the master separation agreement;
liability for goods and services in the ordinary course of business; and
liability for claims of third parties for which indemnification or contribution
is available under the master separation agreement.
Each
of Vishay Intertechnology and we will agree to indemnify the other party and the
other party’s respective current and former directors, officers, and employees
against liabilities arising out of or resulting from the failure of the
indemnifying party to perform or discharge liabilities for which it is
responsible under the master separation agreement; the business of such party;
any liability contemplated to be assumed or retained by such party; any
environmental liabilities for which such party is liable under the master
separation agreement; any breach or failure to perform by such party of its
obligations under the master separation agreement or ancillary agreements; or
any material misstatement or omission of such party in this information
statement or the Form 10 registration statement of which it forms a
part. The amount of each party’s indemnification obligations will be
subject to reduction by any insurance proceeds received by the party being
indemnified.
The
master separation agreement will also specify procedures with respect to claims
subject to indemnification and related matters. If indemnification is
for any reason unavailable or insufficient to hold harmless the indemnified
party, then the indemnifying party will contribute to the amount payable by the
indemnified party in such proportion to place the indemnified party in the same
position as if indemnification were available or, if that is not available or
sufficient, in such proportion as reflects the parties’ relative benefits and
fault.
Contingent
Gains and Liabilities
A
contingent gain means a claim or right that has accrued as of the distribution
date whose existence or scope was not acknowledged, fixed or determined as of
the distribution date in any material respect. A contingent liability
is a liability accrued as of the distribution date whose existence or scope was
not acknowledged, fixed or determined as of the distribution date in any
material respect. The master separation agreement will provide that
each party will have the exclusive right to any contingent gain, and will
indemnify the other party for any contingent liability, that relates exclusively
to such party’s business. The parties will share all other contingent
gains, and will be responsible for all other contingent liabilities, in such
manner and in such percentages as are set forth in the master separation
agreement.
Insurance
and Director and Officer Indemnification
Vishay
Intertechnology will agree to use reasonable best efforts to cause our interests
and rights as insureds or beneficiaries under any occurrence-based insurance
policies of Vishay Intertechnology in respect of periods prior to the
separation, or under any claims-made policies to the extent a claim has been
submitted prior to the separation, to survive the
separation. However, except as specifically provided, Vishay
Intertechnology will not be required to maintain any tail or extended coverage
for our benefit with respect to insurance policies in effect prior to the
separation. Vishay Intertechnology will further agree to administer
insurance policies on our behalf, but this will not relieve us of the obligation
to file claims or limit our authority to settle any claim within the limits of
the relevant insurance policy. If any insurer does not acknowledge
insurance coverage with respect to any liabilities that we have assumed, at our
expense and direction Vishay Intertechnology will pursue and recover insurance
proceeds under the relevant policy on our behalf. We and Vishay
Intertechnology will agree to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate with
respect to the insurance matters contemplated by the master separation
agreement. We will agree that Vishay Intertechnology will have no
liability to us as a result of the insurance practices and policies of Vishay
Intertechnology at any time prior to the separation.
Vishay
Intertechnology will also use its reasonable best efforts to provide insurance
(excluding insurance for any occurrences after the distribution) to those
individuals who will be our officers, directors, employees, fiduciaries or
agents at the time of the separation and who immediately prior to the separation
were insured persons under the current directors and officers liability
insurance policy of Vishay Intertechnology, with material terms and conditions
no less favorable than those given to the officers, directors, employees,
fiduciaries or agents of Vishay Intertechnology at such time, except that the
insurance will exclude coverage for wrongful acts, errors or omissions occurring
after the distribution date.
For
a period of six years from the time of the separation, the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation of Vishay Intertechnology and its amended and
restated bylaws, to the extent they provide for indemnification of officers,
directors, employees, fiduciaries or agents immediately prior to the separation,
will not be amended in a manner that would adversely affect the rights of
persons who at the time of the separation were our officers, directors,
employees, fiduciaries or agents, except as required by law.
Except
as otherwise expressly provided in the master separation agreement, as of the
distribution date, Vishay Intertechnology will not be obligated to maintain
insurance coverage with respect to our business, affairs, operations, assets or
liabilities, and we will indemnify and hold Vishay Intertechnology harmless from
any liabilities arising by reason of our failure to maintain such
insurance.
Dispute
Resolution
The
dispute resolution procedures set forth in the master separation agreement will
apply to all disputes, controversies and claims arising out of the master
separation agreement, the ancillary agreements, the transactions that any of
these agreements contemplate and the parties’ commercial or economic
relationship relating to the master separation agreement or any ancillary
agreement.
Either
party may commence the dispute resolution process by notice to the other
party. The dispute notice, and the required written response of the
other party, will set forth the position of the respective parties and a summary
of their arguments. The parties will then attempt in good faith to
resolve the dispute by negotiation between executives of each party who have
authority to settle the dispute.
If
the dispute has not been resolved within 60 days or if the parties fail to meet
within 30 days after delivery of the dispute notice, the parties will make a
good faith attempt to settle the dispute by mediation in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the master separation agreement. If for any
reason the dispute is not resolved through mediation within 180 days of delivery
of the dispute notice, then the dispute will be submitted to binding arbitration
under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
The
parties are not required to negotiate or mediate a dispute before seeking relief
from an arbitrator or from a court regarding a breach of any obligation of
confidentiality or any claim where interim relief is sought to prevent serious
and irreparable injury. However, the parties are required to make a
good faith effort to negotiate and mediate the dispute while the arbitration or
court proceeding is pending.
Termination
The
master separation agreement and any of the ancillary agreements may be
terminated or the terms of the separation and distribution may be amended,
modified or abandoned, in each case, at any time prior to the effective time by
and in the sole and absolute discretion of Vishay Intertechnology, without our
approval. In the event of such termination, neither party will have any
liability of any kind to the other party.
Tax
Matters Agreement
In
connection with the master separation agreement, we will enter into a tax
matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology. This agreement will
(1) govern the allocation of U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign tax
liability between us and Vishay Intertechnology, (2) provide for certain
restrictions and indemnities in connection with the tax treatment of the
distribution, and (3) address certain other tax-related
matters.
Allocation
of Tax Liability
Until the
distribution occurs, we will be included in Vishay Intertechnology’s
consolidated federal income tax returns and will be included with Vishay
Intertechnology and/or certain Vishay Intertechnology subsidiaries in applicable
combined or unitary state and local income tax
returns.
-
Under the tax
matters agreement, Vishay Intertechnology generally will be liable for all
U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign income taxes attributable to us with
respect to taxable periods ending on or before the distribution date except to
the extent that we have a liability for such taxes on our books at the time of
the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology also will be liable for income taxes
attributable to us with respect to taxable periods beginning before the
distribution date and ending after the distribution date, but only to the
extent those taxes are allocable (using a closing of the books method) to the
portion of the taxable period ending on the distribution
date.
-
With
respect to non-income taxes that are attributable to a tax period prior to the
spin-off, except the extent we have a liability on our books for such taxes at
the time of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology will be responsible for one
half of taxes.
-
Vishay
Intertechnology will prepare and file the U.S. consolidated federal income tax
returns for all periods, including the taxable period in which we are
included, and any Vishay Intertechnology combined, unitary, or consolidated
state income tax returns for all periods, including those in which we are
included. At our request, Vishay Intertechnology will prepare
certain non-U.S. income tax returns for years that ended prior to 2010 that
have not yet been filed. We will generally prepare and file all
other tax returns attributable to us. Generally, Vishay
Intertechnology will principally control any income tax audits for which they
may need to indemnify us, and we will principally control any other tax audit
for taxes attributable to us.
-
Under
the tax matters agreement, we have agreed to reimburse Vishay Intertechnology
if it incurs a cash tax in one of the transactions leading up to the
spin-off. Our obligation is limited by the tax benefit we receive
as a result of the transaction.
Restrictions
and Indemnities in Connection with the Tax Treatment of the
Distribution
The
tax matters agreement also will provide that we are liable for taxes incurred by
Vishay Intertechnology that arise as a result of our taking or failing to take
certain actions that result in the distribution failing to meet the requirements
of a tax-free distribution under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. We
therefore have agreed that, among other things, we will not take any actions
that would result in any tax being imposed on the spin-off.
Specifically:
-
During
the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not liquidate, merge or
consolidate with any other person, specific subsidiaries that conduct an
active trade or business relied upon in connection with the request for a
private letter ruling.
-
During
the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not dispose of any of our
assets, except in the ordinary course of
business.
-
During
the two-year period following the spin-off, we will continue (independently
from Vishay Intertechnology, and with separate employees, officers, and
directors from Vishay Intertechnology) the active conduct of the historic
businesses relied upon in connection with the request for a private letter
ruling that were conducted by us throughout the five-year period prior to the
spin-off.
-
We
will not take, nor will we permit any of our subsidiaries to take, any action
inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the IRS in
connection with the request for a private letter ruling with respect to the
spin-off or to tax counsel pursuant to Section 4.3 of the master separation
agreement.
-
During
the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not, and will not permit
any of our subsidiaries, to purchase our capital
stock.
-
During
the two-year period following the spin-off, we will not issue our capital
stock to any person, other than pursuant to the exercise of employee,
director, or consultant stock options, stock awards, stock purchase rights or
other employment related arrangement under any stock incentive plan in
existence immediately after the spin-off, provided in each case that such
stock issuance meets the requirements for the safe harbor contained in
Treasury Regulations Section
1.355-7(d)(8).
-
We
will not enter into any transaction or, to the extent we have the right to
prohibit any such transaction, permit such transaction to occur, or enter into
negotiations to enter into any transaction that may cause the spin-off to be
treated as part of a plan or series of related transactions pursuant to which
one or more persons acquire directly or indirectly our capital stock
representing a “50-percent or greater interest” within the meaning of Section
355(d)(4) of the
Code.
-
We
will not take any other action that would reasonably be expected to prevent
the spin-off from qualifying as a transaction described in Section 355(a) of
the Code.
In
addition, we have agreed not to engage in certain of the actions described
above, whether before or after the two-year period following the spin-off, if it
is pursuant to an arrangement negotiated (in whole or in part) prior to the
first anniversary of the spin-off.
We may, however,
take certain actions prohibited by the tax matters agreement if we provide
Vishay Intertechnology with a reasonably acceptable opinion of tax counsel or
Vishay Intertechnology receives a supplemental private letter ruling from the
IRS, to the effect that these actions will not affect the tax-free nature of the
spin-off.
Trademark
License Agreement
At
or prior to the separation, we and Vishay Intertechnology will enter a trademark
license agreement pursuant to which Vishay Intertechnology will grant us the
license to use certain trademarks, service marks, logos, trade names, entity
names and domain names which include the term “Vishay.”
License
of Rights and Limitations
Vishay
Intertechnology will grant to us the limited, exclusive, royalty-free right and
license to use certain marks and names incorporating the term “VISHAY” in
connection with the design, development, manufacture, marketing, provision and
performance of foil resistor strain gages, transducers (load cells) utilizing
foil resistor strain gages, electronic instruments that measure and control
output of transducers utilizing foil resistor strain gages, instruments to
measure strain, systems for process and force measurement control and on-board
weighing, foil resistors, current sensors, any additional products which do not
compete with any products within the product range of Vishay Intertechnology or
any of its subsidiaries as constituted immediately following the separation, and
certain services provided in connection with these products. Any use of these
marks on products other than those specified in the trademark license agreement
will require advance written approval by Vishay Intertechnology. Additionally,
Vishay Intertechnology will grant us a limited, exclusive, royalty-free right
and license to display VISHAY alone (i.e., without any other terms) as a marking
on certain foil resistor products qualified to the Mil spec system, meaning
built on a
“
Mil Qualified
”
product line or
SCD (Customer Source Control Drawing) and on Mil drawings and SCDs relating
thereto. The license will be for our use in perpetuity throughout the
world, unless the license is terminated in accordance with the terms of the
trademark license agreement. Unless and until the trademark license is
terminated, and for 24 months thereafter, we will also be allowed to use
the name “Vishay Precision Group, Inc.” as our corporate name. The license also
provides for certain transition period activities including our right to display
VISHAY alone (i.e., without any other term) as a marking on foil resistor
products, and in drawings related thereto, until December 31, 2012, and to
thereafter provide such product and drawings to existing customers until
December 31, 2014. We will also be permitted, for a period of twelve months
following the separation, to distribute certain literature and use office
signage displaying the term VISHAY in the manner it was displayed in that
literature or office signage prior to the separation.
We
will agree that Vishay Intertechnology is making no representation or warranty
to us regarding its right, title and interest in the licensed marks, the absence
of any action relating to the licensed marks or the absence of any claim that
use of the licensed marks violates the rights of any person.
We
will be permitted to use any document number or part number on materials posted
to the internet on or in connection with certain products and services so long
as those document numbers or part numbers do not contain the prefix or suffix
VSH.
Use
Standards
All
products and services that we manufacture, market, provide or perform under the
licensed marks must be of high quality, free of material defects and performed
with integrity and in a professional manner and must be in compliance with
applicable law. We refer to these requirements as the applicable
standards.
We
will maintain appropriate process and quality controls with respect to the
products and services using the licensed marks to assure compliance with the
applicable standards. Vishay Intertechnology will have the right from
time to time at reasonable intervals to receive from us at Vishay
Intertechnology’s sole expense, representative samples of our products and
copies of all marketing materials using the licensed marks. We will
work together with Vishay Intertechnology in order to remedy any failure to
conform to the terms of the trademark license agreement or to comply with the
applicable standards. Any dispute will be resolved in the manner
provided in the master separation agreement.
Additional
Marks; Registration; Enforcement
If
we propose to use any additional marks containing the name “VISHAY,” we will
notify Vishay Intertechnology in advance in writing. If Vishay
Intertechnology does not object in writing within thirty business days, it will
be deemed to have approved the use of such mark. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
no consent will be required in order for us to use any additional marks
containing the name “VISHAY PRECISION” as long as the mark does not contain the
name “INTERTECHNOLOGY.”
At
our reasonable request and expense, Vishay Intertechnology will procure and
maintain the registration of any of the licensed marks. We will not
register any of the licensed marks or any similar marks, unless authorized by
Vishay Intertechnology in writing.
Vishay
Intertechnology will license to us the use of certain internet domain names
containing the name “VISHAY.” If we propose to register an additional
domain name containing the name “VISHAY,” we will notify Vishay Intertechnology
in writing, subject to an exception for domain names including the name
“VISHAY PRECISION” and not including the name “INTERTECHNOLOGY.” If Vishay
Intertechnology does not object in writing within thirty business days, it will
be deemed to have approved the additional domain name.
We
and Vishay Intertechnology will cooperate so that the licensed marks will appear
distinctive from marks utilized by Vishay Intertechnology.
We
agree that unless otherwise specified in the trademark license agreement, we
will not use the word “Vishay” unless it is immediately followed by the word
“Precision.”
Any
dispute concerning our request to use additional marks, additional domain names
or the appearances of our or Vishay Intertechnology’s marks will be resolved in
the manner provided in the master separation agreement.
We
will agree to cooperate with Vishay Intertechnology in the protection of Vishay
Intertechnology’s rights in the licensed marks, as Vishay Intertechnology
reasonably requests. Each party shall promptly advise the other party
in writing of any actual or potential infringement, or any other unauthorized
use of or violation of any of the licensed marks, of which it becomes aware.
Vishay Intertechnology may take such action as it deems necessary or advisable
to stop any infringement. We may request in writing that Vishay
Intertechnology institute an action to stop an infringement. If
Vishay Intertechnology does not institute an action within 30 days, we will be
entitled to do so. Any monetary recovery or sums obtained in
settlement of any action to stop an infringement will be allocated between the
parties in a fair and equitable manner.
Termination
Vishay
Intertechnology may terminate the trademark license agreement if:
-
we
willfully, intentionally and in bad faith breach any material provision of the
agreement or willfully, intentionally and in bad faith fail to cure any other
breach, with Vishay Intertechnology having given us 60 days notice to cure any
breach that can be cured; or
-
we,
without the consent of Vishay Intertechnology, willfully and
intentionally and in bad faith purport to assign our rights and obligations
under the trademark license agreement in violation of the trademark license
agreement; or
-
we
abandon the use of the licensed marks; or
-
we
file a petition under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or a petition
under Chapter 7 is involuntarily filed against us and is not dismissed within
90 days of our receipt of notice of the
filing.
If
we in good faith dispute that Vishay Intertechnology has a valid basis for
termination, the dispute will be resolved in the manner provided in the master
separation agreement and the trademark license agreement will remain in effect
until resolution of such dispute.
Any termination
will not be effective less than 90 days after delivery to us of a notice of
termination. If we in good faith dispute that Vishay Intertechnology
has a valid basis for termination, the dispute will be resolved in the manner
provided in the master separation agreement. Termination of the
trademark license agreement will not relieve us of liability for
breach.
Notwithstanding a
termination, we will be entitled to continue to use the licensed marks and
licensed domain names for a period of up to one year from the date of
termination for the purpose of disposing of our then-existing inventory of
products and/or promotional materials bearing the licensed marks, and for
transitioning us to the use of other marks.
Assignment and Sublicense
The license will be
assignable or sublicenseable to any majority owned subsidiary, provided that we
remain responsible for the compliance by any such majority owned subsidiary with
the terms of the trademark license agreement. We define a “majority owned
subsidiary” as a subsidiary of ours (i) of which over 50% of the voting
securities and over 50% of the outstanding equity interests, whether voting or
non-voting, are owned by either us, one or more of such subsidiaries, or us and
one or more of such subsidiaries, and (ii) which is engaged in the design,
development, manufacture, marketing, provision and performance of products and
services as part of a business under our management and control. If we transfer
our business in the design, development, manufacture, marketing, provision and
performance of products and services substantially as an entirety to a single
purchaser or other single transferee, and thereafter we cease to be engaged in
such business, the transferee will succeed to our rights and obligations. The
following actions are not considered an assignment under the trademark license
agreement: (1) assignment or transfer of our stock, including by way of a
merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization in which our outstanding
shares are exchanged for securities, or (2) any transaction effected primarily
for the purpose of (A) changing our state of incorporation or (B) reorganizing
ourselves into a holding company structure such that, as a result of any such
transaction, we become a wholly-owned subsidiary of a holding company owned by
the holders of our securities immediately prior to such transaction.
Other Provisions
The trademark license
agreement will also contain customary provisions with respect to confidentiality
and indemnification.
Employee Matters Agreement
At or before the
separation, we will enter into an employee matters agreement with Vishay
Intertechnology that provides for the transition of employee benefits
arrangements and allocates responsibility for certain employee benefit matters
on and after the spin-off, including the treatment of existing welfare benefit
plans, savings plans, equity-based plans and deferred compensation plans and our
establishment of new plans. Some of the transactions to be addressed in the
employee matters agreement have been effected as of January 1, 2010, to avoid a
mid-year transition between plans.
References in this
section to Vishay Intertechnology and us include the parties’ respective
subsidiaries as they will exist following the separation.
General Principles
The employee matters
agreement will provide that, prior to the distribution date, to the extent not
previously transferred, all employees of Vishay Intertechnology that are
expected to be employed primarily in our business will be transferred to us.
Except as provided in
the employee matters agreement, Vishay Intertechnology will retain as of the
distribution date all liabilities under the Vishay Intertechnology benefit
plans. Following the distribution date, we will reimburse Vishay
Intertechnology for the cost of any liabilities satisfied or assumed by
Vishay Intertechnology that are our responsibility, and Vishay Intertechnology
will reimburse us for the cost of any liabilities that we satisfy or assume and
that are the responsibility of Vishay Intertechnology.
Our employees who
participate in an existing benefit plan of ours may either continue
participation in that plan after the separation or transfer participation to a
comparable plan that we will establish as contemplated by the employee matters
agreement.
Except as otherwise
agreed in writing between the parties, each employee of Vishay Intertechnology
who becomes our employee will cease participation in the benefit plans of Vishay
Intertechnology, effective as of a date on or after such employee’s
transfer to us but in no event later than the distribution date. We will provide
employees of Vishay Intertechnology who become our employees with credit for all
purposes, including eligibility, vesting, determination of benefit levels and
benefit accruals, under our benefit programs, policies and plans to the same
extent as was recognized by Vishay Intertechnology. We will also credit these
employees with the amount of accrued but unused vacation time and other time-off
benefits.
Retirement Plans
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains various retirement plans, including a 401(k) plan
(referred to as the Vishay Employee Savings Plus Plan) and a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan for senior employees (referred to as the Vishay
Key Employee Wealth Accumulation Plan or KEWAP). We have established or will
establish similar plans for the benefit of our employees. Vishay Intertechnology
has caused or will cause the accounts and underlying assets and liabilities
under the Vishay Intertechnology plans for our employees who were participating
in these plans to be transferred to our corresponding plans or, in the case of
KEWAP assets, from a rabbi trust established by Vishay Intertechnology to one
that we have established or will establish.
Vishay
Intertechnology also maintains a defined benefit pension plan and a nonqualified
defined benefit pension plan. Both of these plans are frozen, which means that
participants retain their benefits, but do not accrue new benefits, and no new
participants are admitted to the plan. We are not establishing a defined benefit
plan, and our employees who participate in the Vishay Intertechnology plan will
be treated the same as any other participant who terminates employment. We have
established or will establish a nonqualified defined benefit plan, which will be
frozen, and the accounts of our employees who participated in the corresponding
Vishay Intertechnology plan will be transferred to our plan similar to the
transfer of accounts under the 401(k) and KEWAP plans.
Health and Welfare Plans
Effective as of or
before the distribution date, we have established health and welfare plans for
the benefit of our employees, which provide the same type of benefits as do the
corresponding plans of Vishay Intertechnology. These include health, life,
dental, vision, prescription drug, short-term disability, long-term disability,
and educational assistance coverage benefits. Our plans have waived and will
waive preexisting condition and other limitations and exclusions, other than
those that were in effect under the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan;
waive any waiting period limitation or evidence of insurability requirement to
the extent satisfied under the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan; and
honor any deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums and co-payments incurred under the
corresponding Vishay Intertechnology plan.
We have also
established effective as of January 1, 2010, health care and dependent care
flexible spending account plans for the benefit of our employees. To the extent
an employee is transferred to us after that date and before the distribution
date, the employee’s accounts with the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology
plans will be transferred to our plans.
We will be responsible for any
workers
’ compensation liability up to the amount accrued on
our balance sheet on the date such worker became our employee, and for any such
liabilities resulting from a compensable injury or occupational disease of our
employees on or after such date.
Equity Awards Generally
Outstanding equity
awards of Vishay Intertechnology in the form of stock options, restricted stock
units (RSUs) and phantom stock will be adjusted as a consequence of the
spin-off.
Stock options
. Effective as of the separation, Vishay
Intertechnology will amend each outstanding grant of stock options made pursuant
to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Program, Vishay
Intertechnology 2007 Stock Incentive Program and the Amended and Restated 1998
Long-Term Incentive Plan of General Semiconductor, Inc. to reduce the exercise
price of each of the options and increase the number of shares issuable upon
exercise of each of the options according to the following formulas:
|
E
Vs
=
E
V
x
P
Vs
/ (P
Vs
+ r
x
P
Ps
)
|
|
and
|
|
N
Vs
=
N
V
x
E
V
/ E
Vs
|
where—
|
E
V
|
|
is the per share exercise price of the Vishay Intertechnology
option prior to the spin-off
|
|
N
V
|
|
is the number
of shares of common stock of Vishay Intertechnology issuable upon exercise
of the option prior to the spin-off
|
|
E
Vs
|
|
is the per share exercise price of the Vishay Intertechnology
option following the spin-off
|
|
P
Vs
|
|
is the per share market value of the common stock of Vishay
Intertechnology following the spin-off
|
|
N
Vs
|
|
is the number
of shares of Vishay Intertechnology issuable upon exercise of the option
following the spin-off
|
|
P
Ps
|
|
is the per share market value of the common stock of Vishay
Precision Group following the spin-off
|
|
r
|
|
is the distribution ratio for the
spin-off.
|
Per share market
value is a volume weighted-average of selling prices for the 10 trading days
following the distribution date. The other terms of the Vishay Intertechnology
stock options, including their remaining vesting schedule if any, will remain
the same.
Phantom stock and restricted stock units.
Effective as of the
separation, Vishay Intertechnology will amend each outstanding grant of phantom
stock awarded pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology Senior Executive Phantom
Stock Plan and each outstanding grant of restricted stock units (RSUs) (both
those subject to ordinary vesting and those restricted stock units subject to
performance-based vesting, sometimes referred to as performance share units or
PSUs) awarded pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive
Program, to increase the number of shares of phantom stock and the number of
RSUs applicable to such grants, according to the following formula:
N
Vs
= N
V
x
[1 + r
x
P
Ps
/ P
Vs
]
where “N
V
” and “N
Vs
” are the number of shares
of Vishay Intertechnology common stock underlying the restricted stock units or
phantom shares before and following the distribution date, respectively; and the
other symbols have the same values as those assigned above with respect to the
formulas for treatment of stock options.
Effective as of the separation,
Vishay Intertechnology will also amend each outstanding grant of PSUs awarded
pursuant to the Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Program to
reduce by 10% the numeric value of each applicable performance goal that applies
to periods following the separation, to reflect the impact of the spin-off on
the achievability of the Vishay Intertechnology performance goals. This
provision only applies to employees who will remain with Vishay Intertechnology
after the spin-off. See
“
Equity Awards Held
by Employees of Vishay Precision Group
”
for a discussion
of the treatment of Vishay Intertechnology equity awards held by employees of
Vishay Precision Group.
The other terms of
the Vishay Intertechnology phantom stock and RSUs, including the remaining
vesting schedule of the RSUs, will remain the same.
Equity Awards Held by Employees of Vishay
Precision Group
As described below,
we expect to replace or offer to replace outstanding equity awards of Vishay
Intertechnology held by our employees with similar awards of our own following
the separation. These awards will be issued pursuant to the Vishay Precision
Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Program, whose terms will be substantially
similar to 2007 Vishay Intertechnology Stock Incentive Program. We will adopt
the 2010 Program prior to the distribution date, and Vishay Intertechnology will
cause the shares of our common stock issuable under the program to be registered
on Form S-8. For a description of the terms of the 2010 Program, see “Executive
Compensation—Equity Awards—Vishay Precision Group, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive
Program.”
Stock options
. All unvested awards of stock options held by
employees of Vishay Precision Group will expire by their terms upon consummation
of the spin-off. Vested but unexercised stock options held by employees of
Vishay Precision Group will generally expire 60 days after consummation of the
spin-off. All or the substantial majority of these options are expected to have
an exercise price, as adjusted for the spin-off, that will be above the market
price for Vishay Intertechnology common stock immediately following the
distribution date.
Effective as of the
separation, we will issue to our employees who hold unvested stock options of
Vishay Intertechnology that will be forfeited as a result of the spin-off stock
options under the 2010 Program in lieu of their Vishay Intertechnology stock
options. We will also offer our employees who hold vested stock options of
Vishay Intertechnology the opportunity to replace those options with options to
acquire our common stock. In either case, the exercise price of each of the
options that we will issue under the 2010 Program and the number of shares of
our common stock issuable upon exercise of each of the options will be
determined according to the following formulas:
|
E
Ps
=
E
V
x
P
Ps
/ (P
Vs
+ (r
x
P
Ps
))
|
|
and
|
|
N
Ps
=
N
V
x
E
V
/ E
Ps
|
where—
|
E
Ps
|
|
is the per share exercise price of the
option to purchase our common stock.
|
|
N
Ps
|
|
is the number of shares of our common
stock issuable upon exercise of the
option,
|
and the other symbols
have the same values as those assigned above with respect to the formulas for
treatment of stock options of Vishay Intertechnology. The other terms of the
options to acquire our common stock will be the same as the options to acquire
Vishay Intertechnology that they are intended to replace. In the case of our
stock options issued in lieu of forfeited Vishay Intertechnology stock options,
the vesting schedule for the options that we issue will be the same as the
remaining vesting schedule of the forfeited Vishay Intertechnology options. If
the exercise price of any options to acquire our common stock is less than the
market value of our common stock on the date we issue the options, we may issue
the options according to a different formula in order to comply with certain
regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Restricted stock units
and phantom stock units
. The only one of our employees who holds RSUs and phantom stock of
Vishay Intertechnology is Ziv Shoshani, who is expected to serve as our Chief
Executive Officer. Phantom stock units are fully vested on issuance. The phantom
stock units of Mr. Shoshani will be converted into shares of common stock of
Vishay Intertechnology upon Mr. Shoshani’s termination of his executive officer
position with Vishay Intertechnology on the distribution date, and these shares
will be treated in the spin-off the same as all other shares of Vishay
Intertechnology common stock.
The unvested Vishay
Intertechnology RSUs held by Mr. Shoshani will expire upon consummation of the
spin-off. In lieu of the expiring Vishay Intertechnology RSUs, we will issue to
Mr. Shoshani as of the distribution date our RSUs according to the following
formula:
N
Ps
= N
V
x
(r +
P
Vs
/P
Ps
)
where “N
V
” is the number of shares of
Vishay Intertechnology common stock underlying the Vishay Intertechnology RSUs
before the distribution date and “N
Ps
” is the number of shares
of our common stock
underlying
our RSUs following the distribution date; and the other symbols have the same
values as those assigned above with respect to the formulas for treatment of
stock options. The other terms of our RSUs will be the same as the Vishay
Intertechnology RSUs that they are intended to replace.
Non-U.S. Employees and
Benefits
Approximately 88% of
our employees are located outside of the United States. We intend to comply with
local law and custom in each jurisdiction outside the United States in which we
operate with respect to any consequences of the spin-off regarding employee
rights and benefits. While many of our employees will be employed by the same
legal entity irrespective of the separation, in some cases employees are being
transferred from a Vishay Intertechnology entity to one of our entities. This
transfer may affect the rights and benefits of the transferred employees. For
example, in Israel we will be required to obtain the consent of transferred
employees and assume certain employment related liabilities in order that the
transfer will not be deemed a termination of employment. Any transfers in other
jurisdictions may have similar requirements. We intend to observe all such
requirements, as applicable.
Additional Matters
Vishay
Intertechnology will acknowledge that, except as provided in the employee
matters agreement, it will remain responsible for any compensatory arrangements
previously provided by Vishay Intertechnology to our employees. Vishay
Intertechnology and we will agree to assign to us, and cause our employees to
consent to the assignment of, any agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and
any of our employees, which are not replaced with agreements between us and the
employees.
Vishay
Intertechnology and we will acknowledge that, with certain exceptions, the
separation and transfer of employment from Vishay Intertechnology to us
will not constitute a termination of employment for purposes of any policy,
plan, program or agreement of Vishay Intertechnology or a change of control for
purposes of any benefit plan of Vishay Intertechnology or us.
The employee matters
agreement will also address certain other matters, such as responsibility for
COBRA coverage, compensation-related tax deductions and customary
indemnification. The dispute resolution provisions of the master separation
agreement will apply to disputes arising under the employee matters agreement.
Transition Services Agreement
On the distribution date, we and
Vishay Intertechnology will enter into a transition services agreement pursuant
to which Vishay Intertechnology, in its capacity as the provider, will provide
us, in our capacity as the recipient, with certain information technology and
other services for a limited time to help ensure an orderly transition following
the separation. We do not expect total payments under the transition services
agreement to exceed $300,000 in the first twelve months or $500,000 in the
aggregate. The substantial majority of such expense will be incurred under the
transition services agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, in this section,
references to the provider refer to the provider of services under each
agreement and references to the recipient refer to the recipient of services
under each agreement.
Services
Pursuant to the
transition services agreement, Vishay Intertechnology, through its subsidiaries,
will provide to us certain information technology support services for our foil
resistor business at costs set forth in the transition services agreement.
The cost of the services to be
provided may not necessarily be reflective of prices that could have been
obtained for similar services from an independent third-party.
The provider will
agree to perform its services in a workmanlike and professional manner, with the
same degree of care as it exercises in performing its own functions of a like
nature, utilizing individuals of suitable experience, training and skill, and in
a timely manner in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
Service levels, if
any, may be decreased from the initial service levels upon the recipient’s
delivery to the provider of advance written notice of such decrease. Any
increase in the scope of services, including the addition of any new services,
will be negotiated in good faith by the parties. The parties will acknowledge
that certain services may be provided by third parties designated by the
provider.
The transition services agreement
will provide that the provider will maintain books and records in reasonable and
customary detail pertaining to the provision of services. The recipient will
have the right to inspect and audit such books and records. The provider will
agree to provide the recipient with customary reports concerning the performance
of the services and as the recipient reasonably requests from time to time.
Cooperation and Consents
Each party will agree
to reasonably cooperate with the other in carrying out the provisions of the
agreement, including, but not limited to, exchanging information, providing
electronic systems used in connection with the services, making adjustments and
obtaining all consents, licenses, sublicenses or approvals necessary to permit
each party to perform its obligations under the agreement. In contemplation of
termination of any services, the provider will agree to cooperate with the
recipient at the recipient’s expense in transitioning such services.
Confidentiality and Intellectual Property
Subject to customary
exceptions, for a period of five years from receipt of confidential information
of the other party, each party will agree to exercise reasonable precautions to
prevent disclosure of confidential information to others; use such information
only as provided in the agreement; and disclose such information only to its
employees with a need to know such information.
Each party’s data,
software or other property or assets owned by such party will remain the sole
and exclusive property and responsibility of such party.
Remedies
The recipient’s sole
remedy under the agreement will be either, at the election of the recipient, to
require the provider to re-perform the service without payment by recipient; to
provide recipient with a credit in an equivalent amount towards future purchase;
or to require the provider to pay the cost or replacing such services with a
third-party provider. Neither party’s liability to the other for any loss
arising out of or resulting from the agreement or the furnishing of services
will, in any month, exceed three times the monthly price of the specific service
which gives rise to the claim for such month.
Indemnification
Each party will
indemnify the other from all liabilities to third parties relating to a breach
of the agreement; gross negligence or willful misconduct; or infringement of
third-party intellectual property in the performance of any service, in each
case, by the indemnifying party, except to the extent that any such liabilities
are caused by the indemnified party. The recipient will further agree to
indemnify the provider for any sales, use or excise taxes, and for liabilities
relating to the content of or defects in any of the recipient’s inventory,
material or other property, or the recipient’s performance of services as agreed
with the provider. The procedures with respect to claims subject to
indemnification will be governed by the master separation agreement.
Term and Termination
The term of the
agreement will end on the 18-month anniversary of the distribution date unless
terminated earlier.
The provider will be
permitted to terminate the agreement in the event an invoice remains unpaid for
60 days. Either party will be permitted to terminate the agreement if the other
party materially breaches any of its obligations under the agreement and does
not cure such breach within 30 days of receiving written notice from the
non-defaulting party, or upon 30 days’ written notice in the event of a
bankruptcy, liquidation or similar occurrence. The recipient will be permitted
to terminate the agreement upon 60 days’ written notice, except that the
recipient may not terminate the agreement earlier than 90 days after the
distribution date.
Dispute Resolution
The parties will
agree to use their respective reasonable best efforts to resolve expeditiously
any disputes between them with respect to the matters covered by the agreement.
In the event that the parties are unable to resolve a dispute, the dispute will
be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in the master separation
agreement.
Secondment Agreement
Vishay
Intertechnology has agreed to second to us two of its employees, Dr. Felix
Zandman and Reuven Katraro, in accordance with the terms of the secondment
agreement. We refer to each of Dr. Zandman and Mr. Katraro as a secondee.
Pursuant to the secondment agreement, Vishay Intertechnology is required to make
each secondee available to us for the services specified in the secondment
agreement for up to 5% of the secondee’s professional working time on a monthly
basis. The initial term of the secondment agreement will expire on the first
anniversary of its execution and will thereafter automatically renew for
additional one year periods unless sooner terminated.
The secondees are
required to perform the services requested by our CEO, who is required to
consult with the CEO of Vishay Intertechnology with respect to scheduling of the
provision of the services. The secondees will at all times remain employees of
Vishay Intertechnology. In consideration for the secondees’ services to us, we
will pay to Vishay Intertechnology an annual fee specified in the secondment
agreement in monthly installments. We will be responsible for reasonable
out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by Vishay Intertechnology or either
secondee in connection with the services provided. Any invention, development,
improvement, process, or design relating to our activities will be our absolute
property, except that the same cannot incorporate the intellectual property of
Vishay Intertechnology without its consent. We may terminate the secondment
agreement at any time upon 30 days written notice. Either party is permitted to
terminate the agreement upon breach; bankruptcy; or inability of a secondee to
perform the required services. The secondment agreement will also contain
customary provisions with respect to confidentiality and indemnification.
Supply Agreements
After the distribution, we
and Vishay Intertechnology each will require certain products
manufactured by the other for manufacture and sale of our
respective products. Accordingly, we and Vishay Intertechnology or one or
more of our respective subsidiaries, will enter into multiple supply agreements
pursuant to which one party will be obligated to supply to the other certain
products described in the supply agreements, up to a maximum aggregate quantity
for each product, at pricing set forth in the supply agreements. The term of
each supply agreement shall be perpetual unless sooner terminated. However,
either party may terminate any of the supply agreements at any time upon written
notice to the other party at least one year prior to the requested date of
termination. The parties will negotiate in good faith as to the pricing for each
product on an annual basis taking into account ascertainable market inputs.
The supplier will be
required to notify the buyer of any change in a product or its manufacture and
the buyer will be required to accept the change or notify the supplier that the
change is unacceptable, in which case the product will be treated as a
discontinued product. At any time the supplier may notify the buyer that the
supplier is discontinuing the manufacture and sale of a product and
the buyer will have the opportunity to place a written last time buy order
at the purchase price in effect as of the discontinuation notice. The buyer will
be obligated to provide forecasts as to quantity needed to the supplier in
accordance with the supply agreements. The supplier will warrant that the
products conform to the specifications set forth in the supply agreement, will
be free from material defects and will be manufactured in accordance with good
manufacturing practice and applicable law. The buyer will be required to make
any claims regarding any non-conforming product within 1 year of shipment and
the supplier’s liability for such claims will be limited to refund or
replacement. Nothing, however, will limit the obligations of the supplier in
respect of third party claims arising from non-conforming products. The supply
agreement will also provide for customary covenants and indemnification
provisions. Any disputes between the parties will be resolved in accordance with
the procedures set forth in the master separation agreement.
Patent License Agreement
In connection with
the separation and distribution, we and Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc., a
subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, will enter into a patent license agreement
pursuant to which Vishay Dale Electronics will grant us a non-exclusive,
royalty-free, worldwide license under a U.S. patent covering a surface mounted
foil resistor to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale, export and import
products until the expiration of the patent, subject to certain termination
rights. The license will be sublicenseable by us to direct or indirect
wholly-owned subsidiaries, so long as we remain responsible for compliance with
the terms of the patent license agreement by our subsidiaries. Vishay Dale
Electronics will make customary warranties and the patent license agreement will
contain customary disclaimer and indemnification provisions. In addition, we
will indemnify Vishay Dale Electronics in any action arising by reason of the
manufacture, marketing, sale, or other activity with respect to the products we
manufacture under the patent or which incorporate a portion of such a product.
Any disputes between the parties will be resolved in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the master separation agreement, except that all
proceedings provided for in the master separation agreement must be conducted in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lease Agreements
We and Vishay
Intertechnology, or our respective subsidiaries, will enter into lease
agreements for space in Be’er Sheva, Israel; Malvern, Pennsylvania; Akita,
Japan; and Holon, Israel. In each case, the lease will be at a market rate and
on customary terms for a lease of its nature.
Be’er Sheva Lease
Vishay
Intertechnology will lease to us approximately 14,000 square feet of space in
Be’er Sheva, Israel for a term of 5 years, for purposes of manufacturing foil
technology products. We will have the option to extend the term for 5 periods of
1 year each on the terms of the lease agreement. We will also be allowed to use
certain common areas of the building. In addition to rent, we will pay our
proportionate share of all taxes and insurance costs, including our use of the
leased space and the common areas.
Other Leases
Vishay
Intertechnology will lease to us or one of our affiliates 2 rooms in its
facility located in Malvern, Pennsylvania for a term of 5 years, to provide a
quality assurance laboratory and a demonstration kit laboratory for
2 of our personnel.
We will lease to
Vishay Intertechnology approximately 2,000 square feet of space in Akita, Japan
for a term of 5 years, for quality assurance operations. The term will be
automatically renewed for successive five-year terms unless either party
notifies the other in writing of termination at least 6 months prior to
expiration of the term. In addition to rent, Vishay Intertechnology will be
responsible for certain costs and expenses, including all consumption tax
related to such costs and expenses. In addition, we will grant to the
lessee a right of first refusal in the event that we desire to
sell the building and the underlying land, which right will
be exercisable during the term of the lease, subject to certain terms and
conditions set forth in the lease agreement.
Finally, we will
lease to Vishay Intertechnology approximately 13,000 square feet of space in
Holon, Israel on a short-term basis. Vishay Intertechnology currently maintains
its administrative offices in the building and we will be leasing this space to
Vishay Intertechnology until their relocation.
Other Agreements
We and Vishay
Intertechnology will also enter into certain other agreements. These include
agreements relating to the manufacture of strain gages by a subsidiary of Vishay
Intertechnology for certain European aerospace customers under which we will
license certain technology to the Vishay Intertechnology subsidiary for a ten
year period, and an agreement with Vishay Intertechnology pursuant to which a
subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology will serve as a manufacturer on our behalf
with respect to the finishing of certain foil resistor chips supplied by one of
our subsidiaries.
Interests in Vishay
Intertechnology
Certain of our directors and
executive officers own Vishay Intertechnology common stock and vested Vishay
Intertechnology options and other equity instruments. Following the spin-off, we
expect our directors and executive officers to beneficially
own approximately 124,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common
stock, based on their holdings as of June 18, 2010.
We expect to replace
or offer to replace outstanding equity awards of Vishay Intertechnology held by
our employees with similar awards of our own following the separation. See
“Employee Matters Agreement – Equity Awards Held by Employees of Vishay
Precision Group” above.
Other Related Party
Transactions
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains, and we expect to maintain, employment agreements with
Ziv Shoshani, who is expected to be our President and Chief Executive Officer.
See “Executive Compensation” above.
We historically have
had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay
Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of our business. See Note 3
to our combined and consolidated financial statements.
Dubi Zandman will be
our Vice President responsible for Systems division operations. Mr. Dubi Zandman
is a cousin of Dr. Felix Zandman. For 2009, Mr. Dubi Zandman received salary and
benefits of $187,496.
Steven Klausner will
be our Vice President – Treasurer. Mr. Klausner is the brother-in-law of Marc
Zandman, who, following the spin-off will become the non-executive chairman of
our board of directors, and the son-in-law of Dr. Felix Zandman. For 2009, Mr.
Klausner received salary and benefits of $177,619.
We expect that our
board of directors or its committees will adopt a written related party
transaction policy, which will govern transactions between our company and our
directors and executive officers and their families; stockholders owning in
excess of 5% of any class of our securities; and certain affiliates of these
persons.
- 151 -
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL
STOCK
The following description is a
summary of the material terms of our capital stock and reflects our charter and
bylaws that will be in effect at the time of the spin-off. We will file our
charter and bylaws as exhibits to our registration statement on Form
10.
Our capital structure
will be substantially congruent with the capital structure of Vishay
Intertechnology. The aggregate number of shares of capital stock which we have
authority to issue is 29,000,000 shares: 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $1.00 per share, 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par
value $0.10 per share, and 3,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par
value $0.10 per share.
Holders of Vishay Intertechnology
common stock and Vishay Intertechnology Class B common stock will receive 1
share of our common stock or our Class B common stock, respectively,
for every 14 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock or Vishay
Intertechnology Class B common stock, respectively, that they own as of June 25,
2010.
As of June 18, 2010, Vishay
Intertechnology had 172,363,925 shares of common stock and 14,352,839 shares of
Class B common stock outstanding.
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
After any required
payment on shares of preferred stock, holders of common stock and Class B common
stock will be entitled to receive, and share ratably on a per share basis in,
all dividends and other distributions declared by our board of directors. In the
event of a stock dividend or stock split, holders of common stock will receive
shares of common stock and holders of Class B common stock will receive shares
of Class B common stock. Neither the common stock nor the Class B common stock
may be split, divided or combined unless the other is split, divided or combined
equally.
The holders of common
stock will be entitled to one vote for each share held. Holders of Class B
common stock will be entitled to 10 votes for each share held. The common stock
and the Class B common stock will vote together as one class on all matters
subject to stockholder approval, except as set forth in the following sentence.
The approval of the holders of common stock and of Class B common stock, each
voting separately as a class, will be required to authorize issuances of
additional shares of Class B common stock other than in connection with stock
splits and stock dividends.
Shares of Class B
common stock will be convertible into shares of common stock on a one-for-one
basis at any time at the option of the holder thereof. The Class B common stock
will not be transferable except to the holder’s spouse, certain of such holder’s
relatives, certain trusts established for the benefit of the holder, the
holder’s spouse or relatives, corporations and partnerships beneficially owned
and controlled by such holder, such holder’s spouse or relatives, charitable
organizations and such holder’s estate. Upon any transfer made in violation of
those restrictions, shares of Class B common stock will be automatically
converted into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis.
Neither the holders
of common stock nor the holders of Class B common stock will have any preemptive
rights to subscribe for additional shares of our capital stock.
We expect that our
common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
“VPG.” We do not anticipate any public market for shares of our Class B common
stock.
Preferred Stock
Our
board of directors is authorized, without further stockholder approval, to issue
from time to time up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock
in one or more series. The board of directors may fix or alter the designation,
preferences, rights and any qualification, limitations, restrictions of the
shares of any series, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion
rights, voting rights, redemption terms and prices, liquidation preferences and
the number of shares constituting any series. No shares of our preferred stock
are currently outstanding.
Warrants
In connection with an
acquisition, on December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued Class A
warrants to acquire 7,000,000 shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at
an exercise price of $20.00 per share and Class B warrants to acquire 1,823,529
shares of Vishay Intertechnology common stock at an exercise price of $30.30 per
share. With the exception of the exercise price, the Class A warrants and the
Class B warrants have identical terms and provisions. Under the terms of these
warrants, on the date of the spin-off, each holder of an outstanding and
unexercised warrant is entitled to a warrant evidencing a right to purchase a
number of shares of our capital stock that the holder would have received had
the holder exercised the Vishay Intertechnology warrants immediately prior to
the record date for the spin-off. The terms of the warrants to acquire our
common stock will be the same as the terms of the Vishay Intertechnology
warrants, except that the exercise price will be determined, subject to further
adjustment in accordance with the terms of the warrants, according to the
following formula:
E
s
= E
o
x
P
s
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
where:
|
E
s
|
|
is the exercise price per share of our common stock of the warrants
that we will issue.
|
|
E
o
|
|
is the exercise
price per share of the Vishay Intertechnology common stock of the relevant
Vishay Intertechnology warrant immediately prior to adjustment for the
spin-off.
|
|
P
p
|
|
is the average
of the daily market prices of the Vishay Intertechnology common stock for
the ten full consecutive trading days following the date on which the
spin-off is consummated.
|
|
P
s
|
|
is the fair market value per share of our common
stock.
|
|
r
|
|
is the number
of our shares distributed pursuant to the spin-off in respect of each
share of Vishay Intertechnology common
stock.
|
“Fair market value”
for these purposes means the average daily market price of the shares of our
common stock for the first ten consecutive trading days following the date on
which the spin-off is consummated; provided that if our shares do not begin
trading within two trading days of the consummation of the spinoff or do not
trade for at least ten consecutive trading days within 20 days after the
spin-off, then the “fair market value” of the shares of our common stock will be
determined by an investment banking firm of national reputation and standing
selected by Vishay Intertechnology and reasonably acceptable to a majority of
the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology warrants on the record date for the
spin-off.
“Daily market price”
for any trading day means the volume-weighted-average of the per share selling
prices on the New York Stock Exchange or other principal United States
securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which the relevant
security is then listed or quoted or, if there are no reported sales of the
relevant equity security on such trading day, the average of the high bid and
low ask prices for the relevant equity security or, if there are no high bid and
low ask prices, the daily market price will be the per share fair market value
of the relevant equity security as determined by an investment banking firm of
national reputation and standing selected by Vishay Intertechnology and
reasonably acceptable to a majority of the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology
warrants.
Following the
spin-off, the exercise price of each Vishay Intertechnology warrant will be
adjusted in accordance with the following formula:
E
n
= E
o
x P
p
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
where:
E
n
is the adjusted exercise price
per share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock of the Vishay Intertechnology
warrants,
and the other symbols
in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the preceding
formula.
As of the
distribution date, we intend to issue Class A warrants and Class B warrants to
acquire shares of our common stock to the holders of the Vishay Intertechnology
warrants, as required by the term of those warrants. We will also enter into a
warrant agreement with American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as warrant
agent, in substantially the same form as the warrant agreement for the Vishay
Intertechnology warrants, dated December 13, 2002. The Vishay Intertechnology
warrant agreement was filed by Vishay Intertechnology as an exhibit to its Form
8-K dated December 23, 2002.
The warrant
agreement, to which the form of warrants will be annexed, will be the document
that governs our Class A warrants and Class B warrants, and it will be filed
upon its execution, at or about the time of the separation. The following
summary description of the warrants sets forth some general terms and provisions
of the warrants, but the summary does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in all respects by reference to the actual text of the warrants and
the warrant agreement. As used below, the term warrants refers to both our Class
A warrants and Class B warrants.
Exercise
The warrants may be
exercised at any time until their expiration date on December 13, 2012. Each
warrant holder will be able to exercise the warrants, in whole or in part, by
delivering to us the certificate representing the warrants, the exercise notice
properly completed and executed and payment of the aggregate exercise price for
the number of shares of our common stock as to which the warrant is being
exercised. We will not issue any fractional shares of our common stock and
instead will pay a cash adjustment equal to the product resulting from
multiplying the fractional amount by the daily market value of one share of our
common stock on the trading day prior to the date the warrant is exercised.
Exercise price
The exercise price of
the warrants will be determined as set forth above. The exercise price, and the
number of shares of our common stock, or the amount and type of other securities
or property issuable upon exercise, will be subject to adjustment in the manner
provided in the warrant agreement in any of the following circumstances:
-
if we declare a stock dividend,
stock split or reverse stock split or if there is a reclassification or
reorganization of our common stock or if we make distributions on our common
stock payable in common stock; or
-
if we issue any evidence of
indebtedness, shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our
common stock by reclassification of our common stock; distribute any rights,
options or warrants to purchase or subscribe for any evidence of indebtedness,
shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our common stock;
distribute cash (other than regular quarterly or semi-annual cash dividends)
or other property to all holders of our common stock; or issue by means of a
capital reorganization other securities of ours in lieu of or in addition to
common stock; or
- 154 -
-
if we distribute any rights,
options or warrants to holders of our common stock at a price per share less
than 90% of the daily market price of our common stock on the record date for
the distribution; provided that if the exercise period is for a period of more
than 60 days after the record date we will distribute the same rights, options
or warrants to the warrant holders on the record date as if the warrant
holders had exercised their warrants immediately prior to the record date;
or
-
if any person or entity acquires
us in a transaction in which we are merged with or into or consolidated with
another person or entity, or if we sell or convey all or substantially all of
our assets to another person or entity, in which case the holder of a warrant,
at the holder’s election, will be entitled to receive either the kind and
number of shares, securities, cash, assets or other property which the holder
would otherwise have been entitled to receive had the holder exercised the
warrants before the transaction, or, subject to certain exceptions, the cash
value of the option according to the Black-Scholes pricing model, or, if the
acquirer is a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act and is
offering a combination of cash and shares, a warrant exercisable for
securities of the acquirer having an adjusted exercise price but otherwise
having the same terms as our warrant and cash; or
-
if we make a distribution to all
holders of our common stock consisting of the capital stock of one of our
subsidiaries or other business units, similar to the spin-off.
If we liquidate,
dissolve or wind up our affairs, other than in connection with a consolidation,
merger or sale or conveyance of all or substantially all of our assets or a
spin-off transaction, then the warrants will expire at the close of business on
the last full business day before the earliest record date fixed for the payment
of any distributable amount on our common stock.
Transfer of Warrants
Each warrant may be
presented for transfer at any time on or prior to its expiration date. Any
proposed transfer of the warrants must be made pursuant either to an exemption
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act or to an effective
registration statement. In addition, each transfer must be made in accordance
with the applicable securities laws of any state of the United States or any
other applicable jurisdiction. If the transfer of the warrants is being made
pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act, we may require that the warrant holder deliver to us an agreement by the
transferee to be bound by certain restrictions on transfer set forth in the
warrant agreement. We may also require an opinion of counsel that the transfer
complies with applicable securities laws.
Registration Rights
Under the terms of a
securities investment and registration rights agreement, dated as of December
13, 2002, executed by Vishay Intertechnology in favor of the holders of the
warrants, Vishay Intertechnology has agreed to take such action as is reasonably
necessary to cause us to register our shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of our warrants on a resale registration statement on terms
substantially identical to the terms and conditions of the Vishay
Intertechnology agreement. These include but are not limited to the
indemnification, piggyback registration and holdback provisions of that
agreement. Also, upon the written request of one or more holders of our warrants
requesting that Vishay Intertechnology effect the disposition of the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise on a resale registration statement by means
of an underwritten offering, Vishay Intertechnology is required to cause us to
cooperate with the warrant holders to facilitate the underwritten offering. We
will not be obligated to effect more than two underwritten offerings for all
holders of warrants in the aggregate or more than one underwritten offering for
the holders of warrants in any 12-month period, or effect an underwritten
offering unless the offering will result in gross proceeds of not less than
$30,000,000, before deducting underwriting commissions. Under the terms of the
master separation agreement, we have agreed with Vishay Intertechnology that we
will comply with these provisions.
- 155 -
Certain Provision of our Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws
Certain provisions in
our proposed amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
summarized below may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay,
deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder might
consider to be in its best interests, including attempts that might result in a
premium being paid over the market price for the shares held by stockholders.
These provisions are intended to enhance the continuity and stability of the
board of directors and its policies.
Board of Directors
Our certificate of
incorporation will provide that our board of directors will have exclusive
authority to establish the size of the board. This authority may serve to
generally delay, deter or impede changes in control of our board of directors.
Class B Common Stock
Our Class B common
stock will have 10 votes per share. As a result, we anticipate that following
the separation, Dr. Felix Zandman will have voting power over 99.4% of our
shares of Class B common stock, giving him the power to cast approximately 45%
of the outstanding voting power of our company following the separation. For so
long as Dr. Zandman or his successors retain voting power at this level, it is
unlikely that a takeover of our company to which Dr. Zandman or those successors
are opposed could be successfully implemented.
Special Stockholder
Meetings
Under our proposed
bylaws, only our board of directors or the chairman of our board of directors
will be able to call a special meeting of stockholders.
Requirements for Advance Notification of
Stockholder Nomination and Proposals
Under our proposed
bylaws, stockholders of record will be able to nominate persons for election to
our board of directors or bring other business constituting a proper matter for
stockholder action only by providing proper notice to our secretary. Proper
notice must be timely, in the case of annual meetings, no earlier than 90 days
and no later than 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the prior year’s
annual meeting, and must include, among other information, the name and address
of the stockholder giving the notice; a representation that such stockholder is
a holder of record of our common stock or Class B common stock as of the date of
the notice, as well as written representations from each proposed nominee
concerning the absence of any undisclosed voting commitments or compensatory
arrangements, and certain other matters; if applicable, certain information
relating to each person whom such stockholder proposes to nominate for election
as a director; and if applicable, a brief description of any other business and
the text of any proposal such stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting
and the reason for bringing such proposal.
- 156 -
Delaware Law
Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) provides that if a person acquires 15%
or more of the voting stock of a Delaware corporation, such person becomes an
“interested stockholder” and may not engage in certain “business combinations”
with the corporation for a period of three years from the time such person
acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock, unless: (1) the board of
directors approves the acquisition of stock or the merger transaction before the
time that the person becomes an interested stockholder, (2) the interested
stockholder owns at least 85% of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation
at the time the merger transaction commences (excluding voting stock owned by
directors who are also officers and certain employee stock plans), or (3) the
merger transaction is approved by the board of directors and by the affirmative
vote at a meeting, not by written consent, of stockholders holding two-thirds of
the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.
Our board of directors will approve the spin-off for purposes of Section 203,
such that any person who acquires 15% or more voting power of our company’s
stock by virtue of the spin-off will not attain the status of an “interested
stockholder” as a result thereof. A Delaware corporation may elect in its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws not to be governed by Section 203 of the
DGCL. We do not intend to make that election.
Limitation on Liability of Directors and
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Section 145 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation has the power to
indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation and certain
other persons serving at the request of the corporation in related capacities
against amounts paid and expenses incurred in connection with an action or
proceeding to which he is or is threatened to be made a party by reason of such
position, if such person shall have acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, and, in any criminal proceeding, if such person had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful; provided that, in the case of actions
brought by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made
with respect to any matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to
be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the adjudicating
court determines that such indemnification is proper under the
circumstances.
Our certificate of
incorporation provides that every person who is or was a director, officer,
employee or agent of the corporation shall be indemnified by the corporation
against all judgments, payments in settlement, fines, penalties, and other
reasonable costs and expenses resulting from any action, proceeding,
investigation or claim which is brought or threatened by or in the right of our
company or by anyone else by reason of such person being or having been a
director, officer, employee or agent of us or any act or omission of such person
in such capacity. Such indemnification shall be available either if such person
is wholly successful in defending such action or if, in the judgment of a court
or the board of directors or in the opinion of independent legal counsel, such
person acted in good faith in what he reasonably believed to be in the best
interests of the corporation and was not adjudged liable to the corporation,
and, in any criminal action, had no reasonable cause to believe that his action
was unlawful. In the case of a derivative action, such indemnification shall not
be made other than in respect of a court-approved settlement or if, in the
opinion of independent counsel, the person satisfied the standard of conduct
specified in the prior sentence, the action was without substantial merit, the
settlement was in the best interests of our company and the payment is
permissible under applicable law. Directors may authorize the advancement of
reasonable costs and expenses in connection with any such action to the extent
permitted under Delaware law.
Our certificate of
incorporation further provides that no director shall have any personal
liability to us or to our stockholders for any monetary damages for breach of
fiduciary duty, to the extent permitted under the Delaware General Corporation
Law.
- 157 -
We expect to maintain
between $20 million and $30 million of insurance to reimburse our directors and
officers and the directors and officers of our subsidiaries, for charges and
expenses incurred by them for wrongful acts claimed against them by reason of
their being or having been directors or officers of our company or any of its
subsidiaries. Such insurance specifically excludes any director or officer for
any charge or expense incurred in connection with various designated matters,
including libel or slander, illegally obtained personal profits, profits
recovered by us pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and deliberate
dishonesty.
Other Matters
We intend to furnish
to our stockholders annual reports containing financial statements audited by an
independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young LLP has been
selected as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year
ending December 31, 2010.
We expect that our
common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
“VPG.”
American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company will be the transfer agent and registrar of our
common stock and Class B common stock.
- 158 -
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN
INDEBTEDNESS
Exchangeable Notes
In connection with
the same acquisition in which Vishay Intertechnology issued its warrants, on
December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or
principal) amount of its floating rate unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102.
The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay Intertechnology on
December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of December 13, 2002.
The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange for shares of its
common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called by Vishay
Intertechnology for similar consideration. The put/call rate is currently $17.00
of nominal amount of the notes per share of Vishay Intertechnology common
stock.
Under the terms of
the put and call agreement, by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is
required to take action, and cause us to take action, so that the existing notes
are deemed exchanged as of the date of the spin-off, for a combination of new
notes of Vishay Intertechnology and notes issued by us. Under the terms of the
master separation agreement, we have agreed with Vishay Intertechnology that we
will comply with these provisions. The terms of the new Vishay Intertechnology
notes and our notes will be identical to the terms of the existing notes, except
for adjustments to the put/call rate, the nominal amounts of the notes and
certain other stock price-dependent parameters described below.
As provided in the
put and call agreement, the put/call rate of the notes that we will issue, and
the put/call rate of the new Vishay Intertechnology notes, will be determined in
accordance with the following formulas, respectively:
R
s
|
=
|
R
o
x P
s
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
R
n
|
=
|
R
o
x P
p
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
|
where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
s
|
|
is the put/call rate of the notes that we will
issue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
n
|
|
is the put/call rate
of the new Vishay Intertechnology notes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
o
|
|
is the put/call rate
of the existing Vishay Intertechnology notes immediately prior to
adjustment for the spin-off;
|
|
|
|
|
|
P
p
|
|
is the average of the
daily market prices of Vishay Intertechnology common stock for the ten
consecutive trading days following the date on which the spin-off is
consummated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
r
|
|
is the number of our
shares of common stock distributed pursuant to the spin-off in respect of
each share of Vishay Intertechnology common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
P
s
|
|
is the fair market
value per share of our shares of common
stock.
|
Fair market value of
the shares of our common stock and daily market price are defined as described
above under “Capital Stock—Warrants.”
- 159 -
The nominal amount of
each note that we issue, and the nominal amount of each new note that Vishay
Intertechnology will issue, will be determined in accordance with the following
formulas, respectively:
A
s
|
=
|
A
o
x (P
s
x r) / (P
p
+ (P
s
x r))
|
A
n
|
=
|
A
o
x P
p
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
|
where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
s
|
|
is the nominal
amount of the note that we issue in exchange for a Vishay Intertechnology
note;
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
n
|
|
is the nominal
amount of the new Vishay Intertechnology note issued in exchange for a
Note;
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
o
|
|
is the nominal
amount of the existing Vishay Intertechnology
note,
|
and the other symbols
in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the first formula in
this section.
These adjustments
will become effective immediately after their determination, retroactive to the
date of the spin-off. Vishay Intertechnology will be obligated to give written
notice of the spin-off to the holder of the existing notes at least ten days
before the record date for the spin-off.
We intend to issue
the notes as soon as practicable following the distribution date, after the
terms of the notes that we will issue are determined. We will also execute a
note instrument and enter into a put and call agreement with American Stock
Transfer and Trust Company, as put/call agent, in substantially the same form as
the corresponding Vishay Intertechnology documents, which were filed by Vishay
Intertechnology as an exhibit to its Form 8-K dated December 23, 2002. The note
instrument and the put and call agreement will be the documents that will govern
the notes that we issue. They will be filed upon their execution, as soon as
practicable following the separation. The following summary description of the
notes sets forth some general terms and provisions of the notes, but the summary
does not purport to be complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to
the actual text of the note instrument and the put and call
agreement.
Interest
The notes will bear
interest at LIBOR. Interest will be payable quarterly on March 31, June 30,
September 30 and December 31 of each calendar year. Interest on any overdue
amounts under the notes will be payable at the rate of 1% per annum over the
otherwise applicable rate. If at any time ending on December 31, 2010, our
common stock has a market value equal to or more than the target price per share
(referred to in the put and call agreement as the interest rate hurdle) for 30
or more consecutive trading days, then the rate of interest on the notes for all
interest periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011 will be 50% of
LIBOR.
- 160 -
The interest rate
hurdle of the notes we will issue, and the interest rate hurdle of the new notes
that Vishay Intertechnology will issue, will be determined in accordance with
the following formulas, respectively:
I
s
|
=
|
I
o
x P
s
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
I
n
|
=
|
I
o
x P
p
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
|
where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
s
|
|
is the interest
rate hurdle for our notes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
n
|
|
is the adjusted
interest rate hurdle for the new Vishay Intertechnology
notes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
o
|
|
is the interest rate
hurdle of the existing Vishay Intertechnology notes immediately prior to
spin-off, with the current interest rate hurdle being
$45.00,
|
and the other symbols
in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the first formula in
this section.
Market value has the
same meaning as daily market price, which is defined under “Capital
Stock—Warrants.”
Transfer
Other than in the
case of transfers to affiliates, the notes will only be transferable in a
minimum nominal amount equal to the lesser of (i) $2,000,000 and (ii) the total
nominal amount of all notes held by a transferor and its affiliates. Transfer of
the notes must be pursuant to an available exemption from registration under the
Securities Act.
Exchange (Put and Call)
Put
. At any time until the maturity date of the
notes, a holder of the notes will be able to exercise the right to require us to
exchange the notes for shares of our common stock. This is referred to as the
“put” right. The put may be exercised with respect to the aggregate nominal
amount of all notes held by the holder or a portion of the nominal amount in
integral multiples of $2,000,000. The number of shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of the put will equal (x) the nominal amount of the notes
for which the put is being exercised, divided by (y) the then-applicable
put/call rate. To exercise the put with respect to a note, the holder will be
required to surrender to the put/call agent the certificate or certificates
representing the notes to be exchanged together with a complete put exercise
notice; deliver a form of transfer in specified form, executed by the holder
with the name of the transferee left blank; and pay any transfer or similar tax
required to be paid by the holder.
We will not issue a
fractional share of common stock upon exchange of a note. Instead, we will
deliver cash for the fractional share equal to an amount determined by
multiplying (i) such fractional share by (ii) the closing sale price of our
common stock on the principal exchange or quotation system on which the common
stock is then traded (or if there is no sale of the common stock reported on
such trading day, the average of the low ask and high bid prices for the common
stock on such trading day on the last trading day prior to the date the put is
exercised and rounding the product to the nearest whole cent.
- 161 -
Call
. At any time beginning on January 2, 2018 and
ending 30 days before the maturity date of the notes, we at our option will have
the right to call all of the notes in exchange for the issuance of shares of our
common stock or cash. This is referred to as the “call” right.
Upon exercise of the
call, if our common stock has had a daily market price at or above the call
target price then in effect for 20 or more out of 30 consecutive trading days at
any time after the date the notes are issued, we will issue to the holders of
the notes that number of shares of common stock equal to (x) the nominal amount
of the notes exchanged divided by (y) the put/call rate then in effect and pay
to the holders an amount in cash equal to accrued but unpaid interest on the
notes. If the common stock has not had a daily market price at or above the call
target price for 20 or more out of 30 consecutive trading days at any time after
the date the notes are issued, at our election, we will either (I) issue to the
holders of the notes a number of shares of our common stock equal to (x) the
nominal amount of the notes exchanged divided by (y) the average of the daily
market prices for the ten trading days ending two trading days prior to the date
that notice of the call is first sent to the holders, and pay to the holders an
amount in cash equal to accrued but unpaid interest on the notes; or (II) pay to
the holders $1.00 for each $1.00 nominal amount of notes subject to the call,
plus cash equal to any accrued but unpaid interest to the date of the
call.
The call target price
of the notes we will issue, and the call target price of the new notes that
Vishay Intertechnology will issue, will be determined in accordance with the
following formulas, respectively:
T
s
|
=
|
T
o
x P
s
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
T
n
|
=
|
T
o
x P
p
/ (P
p
+ (r x P
s
))
|
|
where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
T
s
|
|
is the call
target price for our notes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
T
n
|
|
is the adjusted
call target price for the new Vishay Intertechnology notes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
T
o
|
|
is the target price of
the existing Vishay Intertechnology notes immediately prior to spin-off,
with the current target price being
$35.00,
|
and the other symbols
in this formula have the meanings specified with respect to the first formula in
this section.
Daily market price
has the meaning set forth under “Capital Stock—Warrants.”
We will not issue a
fractional share of common stock upon exchange of a note, and instead will pay a
cash amount determined as described above under the provisions governing the put
right.
At least 30 days but
not more than 60 days before the date of a call, we will be required to send a
notice of redemption to the holders of the notes.
- 162 -
Adjustments
The put/call rate,
the interest rate hurdle and the call target price will be subject to adjustment
in the manner provided in the put and call agreement in the following
circumstances:
-
if we declare a stock dividend,
stock split, reverse stock split or if there is a reclassification or
reorganization of our common stock or if we make distributions on our common
stock payable in common stock; or
-
if we issue any evidence of
indebtedness, shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our
common stock by reclassification of our common stock; distribute any rights,
options or warrants to purchase or subscribe for any evidence of indebtedness,
shares of stock or any other securities to all holders of our common stock;
distribute cash (other than regular quarterly or semi-annual cash dividends)
or other property to all holders of our common stock; or issue by means of a
capital reorganization other securities of ours in lieu of or in addition to
common stock; or
-
if we distribute any rights,
options or warrants to holders of our common stock at a price per share less
than 90% of the daily market price of our common stock on the record date for
the distribution; provided that if the exercise period is for a period of more
than 60 days after the record date we will distribute the same rights, options
or warrants to the holders of notes on the record date as if the holders had
exchanged their notes immediately prior to the record date;
or
-
if any person or entity acquires
us in a transaction in which we are merged with or into or consolidated with
another person or entity, or if we sell or convey all or substantially all of
our assets to another person or entity, in which case the acquirer will be
required to provide a full and unconditional guarantee of the notes, and the
notes will become exercisable for shares of the acquirer, on adjusted terms in
accordance with the put and call agreement; provided that if the acquirer does
not have common equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act
or for whatever reason the acquirer cannot comply with the forgoing provisions
or the acquirer otherwise so chooses, the notes will be called in accordance
with the call provisions described above immediately prior to the transaction;
or
-
if we make a distribution to all
holders of our common stock consisting of the capital stock of one of our
subsidiaries or other business units, similar to the spin-off.
If we liquidate,
dissolve or wind up our affairs, other than in connection with a consolidation,
merger or sale or conveyance of all or substantially all of our assets or a
spin-off transaction, then the right to exchange the notes will expire at the
close of business on the last full business day before the earliest record date
fixed for the payment of any distributable amount on our common stock.
Registration rights
Under the terms of
the securities investment and registration rights agreement, Vishay
Intertechnology has agreed to take such action as is reasonably necessary to
cause us to register our shares of common stock issuable upon exchange of the
notes on a resale registration statement on terms substantially identical to the
terms and conditions of the aforementioned agreement. The terms of registration
are the same as for the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, as
described above. We will not be obligated to effect more than two underwritten
offerings for all holders of notes in the aggregate or more than one
underwritten offering for the holders of notes in any 12 month period, or effect
an underwritten offering unless the offering will result in gross proceeds of
not less than $30,000,000, before deducting underwriting commissions. Under the
terms of the master separation agreement, we have agreed with Vishay
Intertechnology that we will comply with these provisions.
- 163 -
Other Indebtedness
Our Japanese
subsidiary will continue to have debt of approximately $1.6 million outstanding.
We
expect to enter into a revolving credit facility in the approximate amount of
$40 million with a consortium of banks to provide us with flexibility and
additional liquidity, shortly after the separation. We anticipate that the
credit facility will include customary covenants, including restrictions on our
ability to pay dividends or make other distributions on our common stock and
Class B common stock.
We
historically have had significant amounts payable to Vishay Intertechnology
affiliates. The remaining balance of $33.4 million will be repaid at or prior to
the spin-off. However, if our net cash position is less than $58.5 million as of
the spin-off date, Vishay Intertechnology will make a capital contribution to us
pursuant to the master separation agreement, up to a cap of $58.5 million.
For more information concerning this capital contribution provision, see note
(g) to our unaudited pro forma financial statements on page 54.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed a
registration statement on Form 10 with the SEC with respect to the shares of our
common stock being distributed as contemplated by this information statement.
This information statement is a part of, and does not contain all of the
information set forth in, the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect to
our company and our common stock, please refer to the registration statement,
including its exhibits and schedules. Statements made in this information
statement relating to any contract or other document are not necessarily
complete, and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration
statement for copies of the actual contract or document. The public may read and
copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room
at Station Place, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers, including us, that file electronically with the SEC. The public can
obtain any documents that we file with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Information contained on any website referenced in this information statement is
not incorporated by reference in this information statement or the registration
statement of which it forms a part.
As a result of the
distribution, we will become subject to the information and reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, in accordance with the
Exchange Act, we will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC.
We intend to furnish
holders of our common stock with annual reports containing consolidated
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and audited and reported on, with an opinion expressed, by
an independent registered public accounting firm.
You should rely only
on the information contained in this information statement or to which we have
referred you. We have not authorized any person to provide you with different
information or to make any representation not contained in this information
statement.
In addition, our
website can be found on the Internet at www.vishaypg.com. The website contains
information about us and our operations. Copies of each of our filings with the
SEC can be viewed and downloaded free of charge from our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC. To view the reports, access vishaypg.com and click on “SEC
Filings.”
- 164 -
INDEX TO COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Audited combined and consolidated
financial statements
|
|
as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
F-3
|
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
F-4
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of
Operations
|
F-5
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-6
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of
Equity
|
F-7
|
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-8
|
Unaudited interim combined and consolidated
financial statements
as of April 3, 2010 and for the fiscal
quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
Combined and Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
F-51
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
F-52
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
F-53
|
Combined and Consolidated Statement of Equity
|
F-54
|
Notes to Combined and Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
F-55
|
F-1
This page intentionally left blank.
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of
Directors of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
We have audited the
accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets of Vishay Precision Group,
Inc. (the “Business”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related combined
and consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Business’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our
audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the
Business’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Business’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the combined and consolidated financial position of Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the combined and consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 26, 2010
F-3
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$
|
63,192
|
|
|
$
|
70,381
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
23,345
|
|
|
|
32,124
|
|
Net inventories
|
|
43,802
|
|
|
|
57,992
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
|
4,522
|
|
|
|
7,018
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
139,821
|
|
|
|
173,387
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
44,599
|
|
|
|
50,703
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
17,217
|
|
|
|
20,163
|
|
Other assets
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
10,610
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
209,779
|
|
|
$
|
254,863
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to banks
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
Trade accounts
payable
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
8,552
|
|
Net
payable to affiliates
|
|
18,495
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payroll and related
expenses
|
|
6,619
|
|
|
|
9,996
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
6,920
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
37,332
|
|
|
|
28,024
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current
portion
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
5,993
|
|
|
|
9,389
|
|
Net payable to affiliates
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47,436
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
8,065
|
|
Accrued pension and other postretirement
costs
|
|
10,549
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
61,566
|
|
|
|
104,583
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent net
investment
|
|
157,258
|
|
|
|
163,354
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(9,168
|
)
|
|
|
(13,196
|
)
|
Total Parent equity
|
|
148,090
|
|
|
|
150,158
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Total equity
|
|
148,213
|
|
|
|
150,280
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
209,779
|
|
|
$
|
254,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
171,991
|
|
|
$
|
241,700
|
|
|
$
|
239,036
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
119,286
|
|
|
|
161,804
|
|
|
|
154,525
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
52,705
|
|
|
|
79,896
|
|
|
|
84,511
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
|
|
43,356
|
|
|
|
51,714
|
|
|
|
48,017
|
|
Restructuring and severance costs
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
6,349
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93,465
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
(71,632
|
)
|
|
|
36,138
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
(1,574
|
)
|
|
|
(2,294
|
)
|
Other
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
Other income (expense) - net
|
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
6,778
|
|
|
|
(68,426
|
)
|
|
|
36,632
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
5,057
|
|
|
|
5,689
|
|
|
|
8,829
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
(74,115
|
)
|
|
|
27,803
|
|
Less: net earnings attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling
interests
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
Parent
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
$
|
(74,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
$
|
1,721
|
|
|
$
|
(74,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,803
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings
(loss) to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93,465
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
11,465
|
|
|
|
10,851
|
|
|
|
9,797
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
Inventory write-offs for obsolescence
|
|
3,114
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(3,162
|
)
|
|
|
780
|
|
Other
|
|
(2,177
|
)
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
|
(1,724
|
)
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of effects of businesses
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
9,407
|
|
|
|
5,384
|
|
|
|
(2,354
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
11,694
|
|
|
|
(6,286
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
(2,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,217
|
)
|
|
|
(2,175
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
(5,902
|
)
|
|
|
(2,091
|
)
|
|
|
973
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
29,236
|
|
|
|
22,461
|
|
|
|
32,065
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
(7,391
|
)
|
|
|
(8,329
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24,272
|
)
|
|
|
(46,809
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of business
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,097
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(29,659
|
)
|
|
|
(37,010
|
)
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
Net changes in short-term
borrowings
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
Distributions to non-controlling interests
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Transactions with Vishay
Intertechnology
|
|
(36,876
|
)
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
|
(11,767
|
)
|
Contributions from Vishay Intertechnology for
acquisitions
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,653
|
|
|
|
47,218
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities
|
|
(38,002
|
)
|
|
|
26,038
|
|
|
|
30,077
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
(5,262
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
(7,189
|
)
|
|
|
13,578
|
|
|
|
26,665
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of year
|
|
70,381
|
|
|
|
56,803
|
|
|
|
30,138
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
63,192
|
|
|
$
|
70,381
|
|
|
$
|
56,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Parent
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
Total
|
|
Investment
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Equity
|
|
Interests
|
|
Equity
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
$
|
155,598
|
|
|
$
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
$
|
154,116
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
154,180
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
27,692
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,692
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
27,803
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial
items
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,527
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
30,638
|
|
Contribution of PM Group
|
|
47,218
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47,218
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47,218
|
|
Other transactions with Vishay -
net
|
|
(2,586
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,586
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,586
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
$
|
228,067
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
229,420
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
229,591
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
(74,130
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(74,130
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(74,115
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial items
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,679
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(88,664
|
)
|
Contribution of Powertron GmbH
|
|
14,653
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,653
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,653
|
|
Other transactions with Vishay - net
|
|
(5,359
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,359
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,359
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
$
|
163,354
|
|
|
$
|
(13,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
150,158
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
150,280
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial
items
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,732
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
5,749
|
|
Other transactions with Vishay - net
|
|
(7,935
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,935
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,935
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
157,258
|
|
|
$
|
(9,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
148,090
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
148,213
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-7
Vishay Precision Group,
Inc.
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Basis of
Presentation
Background
On October 27, 2009,
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (“Vishay Intertechnology”) announced that it
intends to spin off its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses into
an independent, publicly traded company to be named Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
(the “Business”). The spin-off is expected to take the form of a tax-free stock
dividend to Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders.
The Business is an international
designer, manufacturer and marketer of Foil Technology Products (strain gages,
ultra-precision foil resistors, current sensors) and Weighing Modules and
Control Systems (load cells/transducers, instruments, weighing modules, and
control systems) for a wide variety of applications.
Basis of Presentation
The Business is
currently part of Vishay Intertechnology and its assets and liabilities consist
of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and
foil resistor businesses.
The Business is
conducted by various direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology.
In this context, no direct ownership relationship existed among the various
units comprising the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated
financial statements have been derived from Vishay Intertechnology’s historical
accounting records and are presented on a carve-out basis.
Before effecting the
spin-off, all assets and liabilities associated with the Business will be
contributed to Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
The combined and
consolidated statement of operations includes all revenues and expenses directly
attributable to the Business, including costs for facilities, functions, and
services used by the Business at shared sites and costs for certain functions
and services performed by centralized Vishay Intertechnology organizations
outside of the defined scope of the Business and directly charged to the
Business based on usage. The results of operations also include allocations of
(i) costs for administrative functions and services performed on behalf of the
Business by centralized staff groups within Vishay Intertechnology, (ii) Vishay
Intertechnology general corporate expenses, (iii) pension and other
postemployment benefit costs, (iv) interest expense, and (v) current and
deferred income taxes. See Notes 3, 7, 8, 10, and 15 for a description of the
allocation methodologies utilized.
All of the allocations and
estimates in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements are
based on assumptions that Vishay Intertechnology management believes are
reasonable, and reasonably approximate the historical costs that the Business
would have incurred as a separate entity for the same level of service or
support. However, these allocations and estimates are not necessarily
indicative of the costs and expenses that would have resulted if the Business
had been operated as a separate entity.
Following the spin-off, the
Business will incur incremental costs to both replace Vishay Intertechnology
support and to allow the Business to function as an independent, publicly-traded
company.
Actual costs that may have been
incurred if the Business had been a stand-alone company would depend on a number
of factors, including the chosen organizational structure, what functions were
outsourced or performed by employees, and strategic decisions made in areas such
as information technology and infrastructure. Following the spin-off, the
Business will perform these functions using its own resources or purchases these
services.
F-8
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Principles of Combination and Consolidation
The combined and
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the individual
entities which comprise the Business in which Vishay Intertechnology maintained
a controlling financial interest. For those subsidiaries in which the Business’s
ownership is less than 100 percent, the outside stockholders’ interests are
shown as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying combined and consolidated
balance sheets. Investments in affiliates over which the Business has
significant influence but not a controlling interest are carried on the equity
basis. Investments in affiliates over which the Business does not have
significant influence are accounted for by the cost method.
Certain transactions
have been accounted for as mergers of entities under common control and thus
recorded in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Accordingly, the
accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of these entities for all relevant periods presented.
All transactions,
accounts, and profits between individual members comprising the Business have
been eliminated in combination.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the combined and consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Business
recognizes revenue on product sales during the period when the sales process is
complete. This generally occurs when products are shipped to the customer in
accordance with terms of an agreement of sale, title and risk of loss have been
transferred, collectibility is reasonably assured, and pricing is fixed or
determinable. For a small percentage of sales where title and risk of loss
passes at point of delivery, the Business recognizes revenue upon delivery to
the customer, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
Some of the
Business’s larger systems products have post-shipment obligations, such as
customer acceptance, training, or installation. In such circumstances, revenue
is deferred until the obligation has been completed unless such obligation is
deemed inconsequential and perfunctory.
Given the specialized
nature of our products, the Business generally does not allow product returns
except for quality issues.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling
costs are included in costs of products sold.
F-9
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
Research and Development Expenses
Research and
development costs are expensed as incurred. The amount charged to expense for
research and development aggregated $4,550,000, $4,848,000, and $4,502,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The Business
spends additional amounts for the development of machinery and equipment for new
processes and for cost reduction measures.
Income Taxes
The provision for
income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting
for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax
consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents
income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred
taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the
financial and tax bases of the Business’s assets and liabilities and are
adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted.
Valuation allowances have been established for deferred tax assets which the
Business believes do not meet the “more likely than not” criteria established by
ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes
. This criterion requires a level of judgment
regarding future taxable income, which may be revised due to changes in market
conditions, tax laws, or other factors. If the Business’s assumptions and
estimates change in the future, valuation allowances established may be
increased, resulting in increased tax expense. Conversely, if the Business is
ultimately able to utilize all or a portion of the deferred tax assets for which
a valuation allowance has been established, then the related portion of the
valuation allowance can be released, resulting in decreased tax expense.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents includes demand deposits and highly liquid investments with
maturities of three months or less when purchased. Highly liquid investments
with maturities greater than three months are classified as short-term
investments. There were no investments classified as short-term investments at
December 31, 2009 or 2008.
The Business’s
subsidiaries in Europe historically participated in a formal cash pooling
agreement, with Vishay Europe GmbH, an affiliate company, acting as the cash
pool leader, effectively serving as a bank for these subsidiaries. The
individual entity has discretion over the use of its cash, and accordingly, the
combined and consolidated financial statements classify the cash pool balances
as “cash and cash equivalents.”
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Business
maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from
the inability of its customers to make required payments. The allowance is
determined through an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable and
assessments of risk that are based on historical trends and an evaluation of the
impact of current and projected economic conditions. The Business evaluates the
past-due status of its trade receivables based on contractual terms of sale. If
the financial condition of the Business’s customers were to deteriorate,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required. The allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31,
2009 and 2008 was $662,000 and $737,000, respectively. Bad debt expense (income
realized upon subsequent collection) was $362,000, $(477,000), and $133,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
F-10
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
Inventories
Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or
market. Inventories are adjusted for estimated obsolescence and written down to
net realizable value based upon estimates of future demand, technology
developments, and market conditions.
Property and Equipment
Property and
equipment is carried at cost and is depreciated principally by the straight-line
method based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets. Machinery and
equipment are being depreciated over useful lives of seven to ten years.
Buildings and building improvements are being depreciated over useful lives of
twenty to forty years. Construction in progress is not depreciated until the
assets are placed in service. Depreciation of capital lease assets is included
in total depreciation expense. Depreciation expense was $8,446,000, $8,410,000,
and $8,130,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. Gains and losses on the disposal of assets which do not qualify
for presentation as discontinued operations are included in the determination of
operating margin (within selling, general, and administrative
expenses).
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but rather are tested for
impairment at least annually. These tests are performed more frequently if there
are triggering events.
Definite-lived
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Patents and
acquired technology are being amortized over useful lives of seven to twenty
years. Customer relationships are being amortized over useful lives of five to
fifteen years. Trade names are being amortized over useful lives of seven to ten
years. Non-competition agreements are being amortized over periods of five to
ten years. The Business continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful
lives of these assets.
ASC Topic 350,
Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other
, prescribes a
two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. In the first step, the
Business determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares that fair
value to the net book value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the
reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including a
discounted cash flow analysis (an income approach) and a comparable companies
market multiple approach.
If the net book value
of the reporting unit were to exceed the fair value, the Business would then
perform the second step of the impairment test, which requires allocation of the
reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities in a manner
similar to a purchase price allocation, with any residual fair value being
allocated to goodwill. An impairment charge will be recognized only when the
implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying
amount.
For the purposes of
the combined and consolidated financial statements presented on a stand-alone
basis, the Business has evaluated its goodwill using its operating segments,
namely, Foil Technology Products and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, as
its reporting units.
As more fully
described in Note 5, in light of a sustained decline in market capitalization
for Vishay Intertechnology and its peer group companies, and other factors,
Vishay Intertechnology determined that an impairment test was necessary as of
the end of the second, third, and fourth fiscal quarters of 2008.
F-11
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
Based on Vishay
Intertechnology’s interim impairment tests performed as of the end of the
second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008, the Business performed retrospective
goodwill impairment tests for its reporting units as of the end of the second,
third, and fourth quarters of 2008.
The Business’s
required annual impairment test is completed as of the first day of the fourth
fiscal quarter of each year. The interim impairment test performed as of
September 27, 2008, the last day of the fiscal third quarter, was effectively
the Business’s annual impairment test for 2008. There was no impairment
identified through the annual impairment test completed in 2007.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The carrying value of
long-lived assets held-and-used, other than goodwill, is evaluated when events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
The carrying value of a long-lived asset group is considered impaired when the
total projected undiscounted cash flows from such asset group are separately
identifiable and are less than the carrying value. In that event, a loss is
recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair
market value of the long-lived asset group. Fair market value is determined
primarily using present value techniques based on projected cash flows from the
asset group. Losses on long-lived assets held-for-sale, other than goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets, are determined in a similar manner, except
that fair market values are reduced for disposal costs.
Available-for-Sale Securities
Other assets include
investments in marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale.
These assets are held in trust related to the Business’s nonqualified pension
and deferred compensation plans. See Note 15. These assets are reported at fair
value, based on quoted market prices as of the end of the reporting period.
Unrealized gains and losses are reported, net of their related tax consequences,
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in equity until sold.
At the time of sale, any gains (losses) calculated by the specific
identification method are recognized as a reduction (increase) to benefits
expense, within selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Financial Instruments
The Business uses
financial instruments in the normal course of its business, including from time
to time, derivative financial instruments. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there
were no outstanding derivative instruments.
The Business reports
derivative instruments on the combined and consolidated balance sheet at their
fair values. The accounting for changes in fair value depends upon the purpose
of the derivative instrument and whether it is designated and qualifies for
hedge accounting. For instruments designated as hedges, the effective portion of
gains or losses is reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and the
ineffective portion, if any, is reported in current period net earnings (loss).
Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that are not designated as
hedges are recorded in current period net earnings (loss).
F-12
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
Foreign Currency Translation
The Business has
significant operations outside of the United States. The Business finances its
operations in Europe and certain locations in Asia in local currencies, and
accordingly, these subsidiaries utilize the local currency as their functional
currency. The Business’s operations in Israel and certain locations in Asia
are largely financed in U.S. dollars, and accordingly, these subsidiaries
utilize the U.S. dollar as their functional currency.
For those
subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and
liabilities in the combined and consolidated balance sheets have been translated
at the rate of exchange as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are
translated at the average exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments do
not impact the combined and consolidated statements of operations and are
reported as a separate component of equity. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses are included in the results of operations.
For those foreign
subsidiaries where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, all foreign
currency financial statement amounts are remeasured into U.S. dollars. Exchange
gains and losses arising from remeasurement of foreign currency-denominated
monetary assets and liabilities are included in the combined and consolidated
statements of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation costs
related to share-based payments are recognized in the combined and consolidated
financial statements. The amount of compensation cost is measured based on the
grant-date fair value of the equity (or liability) instruments issued.
Compensation cost is recognized over the period that an officer, employee, or
non-employee director provides service in exchange for the award. For options
and restricted stock units subject to graded vesting, the Business recognizes
expense over the service period for each separately vesting portion of the award
as if the award was, in-substance, multiple awards.
Commitments and Contingencies
Liabilities for loss
contingencies, including environmental remediation costs, arising from claims,
assessments, litigation, fines, penalties, and other sources are recorded when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the
assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. The costs for a
specific environmental remediation site are discounted if the aggregate amount
of the obligation and the amount and timing of the cash payments for that site
are fixed or reliably determinable based upon information derived from the
remediation plan for that site. Accrued liabilities for environmental matters
recorded at December 31, 2009 and 2008 do not include claims against third
parties.
F-13
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2009-01,
Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles
(ASC Topic
105), which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“the
Codification” or “ASC”) as the official single source of authoritative GAAP. All
existing accounting standards are superseded. All other accounting guidance not
included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The
Codification also includes all relevant Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) guidance organized using the same topical structure in separate sections
within the Codification.
Following the
Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements,
FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will
issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) which will serve to update the
Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the
basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.
The Codification is
not intended to change GAAP, but it changes the way GAAP is organized and
presented. The Codification’s principal impact on the Business’s financial
statements is limited to disclosures as all future references to authoritative
accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with the
Codification.
In September 2006,
the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(ASC Topic 820). This statement defines fair
value, provides guidance for measuring fair value, and requires additional
disclosures. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements,
but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements. The statement was to be effective for the Business as
of January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-2 (ASC Topic
820-10-65), which provided a one-year delayed application of SFAS No. 157 (ASC
Topic 820) for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis. Accordingly, the Business only partially applied SFAS No. 157 (ASC Topic
820) as of January 1, 2008. The partial application of this guidance did not
have a material effect on the Business’s financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity, and the adoption, on January 1, 2009, of the remaining
aspects which were deferred by FSP SFAS 157-2 (ASC Topic 820-10-65) did not have
a material effect on the Business’s financial position, results of operations,
or liquidity.
In December 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 141-R,
Business Combinations
(ASC Topic 805). While retaining the fundamental requirements of the
previous GAAP, this new statement makes various modifications to the accounting
for contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, purchased in-process
research and development, acquisition-related transaction costs,
acquisition-related restructuring costs, and changes in tax valuation allowances
and tax uncertainty accruals. The Business adopted this guidance effective
January 1, 2009. Earlier adoption was prohibited.
F-14
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In December 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(ASC Topic 810). SFAS No.
160 (ASC Topic 810) amends GAAP to establish accounting and reporting guidance
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which
is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the
consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. Among other requirements, this statement requires
consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the
amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. The Business adopted this guidance effective January 1,
2009. The presentation and disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 160 (ASC Topic
810) have been applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
In March 2008, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(ASC Topic
815)
.
This statement requires enhanced disclosures
about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, and therefore improves the
transparency of financial reporting. The Business adopted this guidance
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
effect on the Business’s financial statements.
In April 2008, the
FASB staff issued FSP SFAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(ASC Topic 350-30-65)
.
This guidance is
intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 (ASC Topic 350), and the period of expected
cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141-R (ASC
Topic 805) when the underlying arrangement includes renewal or extension of
terms that would require substantial costs or require a material modification to
the asset upon renewal or extension. Companies estimating the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset must now consider their historical experience in
renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical
experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about
renewal or extension as adjusted by SFAS No. 142’s (ASC Topic 350)
entity-specific factors. The Business adopted this guidance effective January 1,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the
Business’s financial statements.
In December 2008, the
FASB staff issued FSP SFAS 132(R)-1,
Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
(ASC Topic
715-20-65-2)
.
This guidance requires enhanced disclosures
about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The
Business has provided these disclosures in Note 15. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material effect on the Business’s financial position,
results of operations, or liquidity.
In April 2009, the
FASB staff issued
FSP SFAS No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly
(ASC
Topic 820-10-65)
.
This guidance clarifies the methodology to be
used to determine fair value when there is no active market or where the price
inputs being used represent distressed sales. This guidance also reaffirms the
objective of fair value measurement, as stated in SFAS No. 157 (ASC Topic 820),
which is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly
transaction. It also reaffirms the need to use judgment to determine if a
formerly active market has become inactive, as well as to determine fair values
when markets have become inactive. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material effect on the Business’s financial statements.
F-15
Note 3 – Related Party
Transactions
Throughout the period
covered by the combined and consolidated financial statements, the Business had
significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay
Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. While
these transactions are not necessarily indicative of the terms the Business
would have achieved had the Business been a separate entity, management believes
they are reasonable.
Historically, the
Business has used the corporate services of Vishay Intertechnology for a variety
of functions including treasury, tax, legal, internal audit, human resources,
and risk management. After the spin-off, the Business will be an independent,
publicly traded company. The Business expects to incur additional costs
associated with being an independent, publicly traded company. These additional
anticipated costs are not reflected in its historical combined and consolidated
financial statements.
Sales Organizations
A portion of the
Business’s Foil Technology products are sold by the Vishay Intertechnology
worldwide sales organization, which operates as regionally-based legal entities.
The third-party sale of these products is presented in the combined and
consolidated financial statements as if it were made by the Business, although
legal entities outside of the defined scope of the Business actually made these
sales. Third-party sales made through the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales
organization totaled $13,006,000, $16,909,000, and $15,319,000 during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
The selling entities
receive selling commissions on these sales. Commission rates are set at the
beginning of each year based on budgeted selling expenses expected to be
incurred by the Vishay Intertechnology sales organization. Commission expense
charged to the Business by the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales
organization was $704,000, $654,000, and $529,000 during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.
The net cash
generated by these transactions is retained by the Vishay Intertechnology
selling entity, and is presented in the combined and consolidated balance sheet
as a reduction in parent net investment, and is presented in the combined and
consolidated statements of cash flows as a financing activity in the caption
“Transactions with Vishay Intertechnology.”
These sales
activities will be transitioned to the Business’s dedicated sales forces shortly
after the spin-off.
Shared Facilities
The Business and
operations of Vishay Intertechnology outside the defined scope of the Business
share certain manufacturing and administrative sites. Costs are allocated based
on relative usage of the respective facilities.
Following the
spin-off, the Business and Vishay Intertechnology will continue to share certain
manufacturing locations. The Business will own one location in Israel and one
location in Japan, and will lease space to Vishay Intertechnology. Vishay
Intertechnology will own one location in Israel and one location in the United
States and lease space to the Business.
F-16
Note 3 – Related Party
Transactions
Administrative Service Sharing Agreements
The combined and
consolidated financial statements include transactions with other Vishay
Intertechnology operations involving administrative services (including expenses
primarily related to personnel, insurance, logistics, other overhead functions,
corporate IT support, and network communications support) that were provided to
the Business by Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of
the Business. Amounts charged to the Business for these services during the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $2,483,000, $1,859,000, and
$1,451,000, respectively.
The Business will be
required to assume the responsibility for these functions, either internally or
from third-party vendors, following the spin-off. Under the terms of a
transition services agreement that the Business expects to enter into with
Vishay Intertechnology prior to the consummation of the spin-off, Vishay
Intertechnology will provide to the Business, for a fee, specified support
services for a period of 18 months after the spin-off.
Allocated Corporate Overhead Costs
The costs of certain
services that are provided by the Vishay Intertechnology corporate office to the
Business have been reflected in the combined and consolidated financial
statements, including charges for services such as accounting matters for all
SEC filings, investor relations, tax services, cash management, legal services,
and risk management on a global basis. These allocated costs are included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined and
consolidated statements of operations, and are presented in the combined and
consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in parent net investment.
The total amount of
allocated costs was $1,813,000, $2,771,000, and $2,449,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These costs were allocated on
the ratio of Business revenues to total revenues and represent management’s
reasonable allocation of the costs incurred. However, these amounts are not
representative of the costs necessary for the Business to operate as an
independent, publicly traded company.
F-17
Note 3 – Related Party
Transactions
Centralized Cash Management
Vishay
Intertechnology uses a centralized approach to cash management in the United
States and Europe.
In the United States,
cash deposits from the Business historically were transferred to Vishay
Intertechnology on a regular basis and were netted against intercompany
payables, or occasionally remitted to the parent as a dividend. See “Net Payable
to Affiliates” in Note 8.
The Business’s
subsidiaries in Europe historically participated in a formal cash pooling
agreement, with Vishay Europe GmbH, an affiliate company, acting as the cash
pool leader, effectively serving as a bank for these subsidiaries. Each day, the
individual participant entity can either deposit funds into the cash pool
account from the collection of receivables or withdraw funds from the account to
fund working capital or other cash needs of the participant entity. At the end
of the day, the cash pool leader sweeps all cash balances into the cash pool
leader’s account, or funds any overdrawn accounts so that each cash pool
participant account has a zero balance at the end of the day. The individual
entity has discretion over the use of its cash, and accordingly, the combined
and consolidated financial statements classify the cash pool balances as “cash
and cash equivalents.” The Business’s subsidiaries have withdrawn from the
European cash pool as of December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, the Business
had $26,403,000 of cash deposited with the European cash pool.
Vishay Europe GmbH,
as cash pool leader, pays interest on these funds based on the prevailing
interest rates at third-party lending institutions in Europe. The combined and
consolidated financial statements reflect cash pool interest income of $302,000,
$935,000, and $497,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
Net Payable to Affiliates
See Note 8.
F-18
Note 4 - Acquisition
Activities
Since 2002, the
Business has implemented a strategy of vertical product integration, by growing
its weighing systems business and by promoting its sophisticated electronic
weighing modules and other products that integrate the precision measurement
components designed and produced by the Business.
In pricing an
acquisition, the Business focuses primarily on the target’s revenues and
customer base, the strategic fit of the target’s product line with the
Business’s existing product offerings (particularly how the target’s products
fit into the Business’s vertical product integration strategy), opportunities
for cost-cutting and integration with the Business’s existing operations and
production, and other post-acquisition synergies, rather than on the target’s
assets, such as its property, equipment, and inventory. As a result, the fair
value of the acquired assets may correspond to a relatively smaller portion of
the acquisition price, with the Business recording a substantial amount of
goodwill related to the acquisition (see Note 5).
Year ended December 31, 2008
The Business made two
acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Acquisition of Partner’s Interest in India
Joint Venture
On June 30, 2008, in
the Business’s fiscal third quarter, the Business acquired its partner’s
interest in a joint venture in India. Vishay Intertechnology previously owned
49% of this entity, which is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of
transducers. The entity has been renamed Vishay Transducers India,
Ltd.
As a non-controlled
investment, Vishay Transducers India, Ltd. had been accounted for using the
equity basis. Effective June 30, 2008, the Business began reporting
this entity as a consolidated subsidiary, included in the Weighing Modules and
Control Systems segment. The Business recognized revenues of $340,000 and
$760,000 during the period ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31,
2007, respectively, on sales to this affiliate prior to acquiring control of
this entity. The Business made purchases of $1,500,000 and $3,150,000 during the
period ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively,
from this affiliate prior to acquiring control of this entity.
The acquisition has
been accounted for as a step-acquisition in accordance with then-applicable U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the cost to acquire the
partner’s 51% interest has been allocated on a pro rata basis to assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, with the excess being
allocated to goodwill, as follows
(in thousands)
:
Working capital
|
$
|
219
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
495
|
|
Trade names
|
|
125
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
58
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
5,000
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
317
|
|
Other assets (liabilities),
net
|
|
(1,850
|
)
|
Pro rata share of identifiable assets
|
$
|
4,364
|
|
|
Purchase price including direct costs of
acquisition
|
|
|
|
and
net of cash acquired
|
$
|
9,598
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
5,234
|
|
|
The intangible assets
associated with this transaction are being amortized over weighted-average
useful lives of 10 years.
F-19
Note 4 – Acquisition and Divestiture
Activities (continued)
The goodwill
associated with this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes. The
goodwill associated with this transaction was subsequently written off as part
of the goodwill impairment charges recorded in 2008 (see Note 5).
Acquisition of Powertron
GmbH
On July 23, 2008, the
Business acquired Powertron GmbH, a manufacturer of specialty precision
resistors. For financial reporting purposes, the results of operations for
Powertron have been included in the Foil Technology Products segment from July
23, 2008.
The acquisition has
been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the purchase price
has been allocated as follows, to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their fair values, with the excess being allocated to goodwill
(in thousands)
:
Working capital
|
$
|
(302
|
)
|
Property and equipment
|
|
474
|
|
Trade names
|
|
59
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
110
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
3,500
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
903
|
|
Other assets (liabilities),
net
|
|
37
|
|
Total identifiable assets
|
$
|
4,781
|
|
|
Purchase price including direct costs of
acquisition
|
|
|
|
and
net of cash acquired
|
$
|
14,674
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
9,893
|
|
|
The non-competition
agreements, trade names, completed technology, and customer relationships are
being amortized over weighted-average useful lives of 5 years, 7 years, 10
years, and 15 years, respectively.
The goodwill
associated with this transaction is not deductible for income tax purposes. The
goodwill associated with this transaction was subsequently written off as part
of the goodwill impairment charges recorded in 2008 (see Note 5).
F-20
Note 4 – Acquisition and Divestiture
Activities (continued)
Year ended December 31, 2007
Acquisition of PM Group PLC and Sale of its
Electrical Contracting Business
On April 19, 2007,
the Business declared its cash tender offer for all shares of PM Group PLC
wholly unconditional, and assumed ownership of PM Group. PM Group is an advanced
designer and manufacturer of systems used in the weighing and process control
industries located in the United Kingdom. The aggregate cash paid for all shares
of PM Group was approximately $45.7 million. The transaction was funded using
cash on-hand.
Concurrent with the
completion of the transaction, Vishay Intertechnology sold PM Group’s electrical
contracting business for approximately $16.1 million. No gain or loss was
recognized on the sale of the electrical contracting business.
The results of
operations of PM Group are included in the results of the Weighing Modules and
Control Systems segment from April 19, 2007.
The acquisition has
been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the purchase price
has been allocated as follows, to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their fair values, with the excess being allocated to goodwill
(in thousands)
:
Working capital
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
7,138
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
663
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
296
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
Other assets (liabilities),
net
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
Restructuring liabilities
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
16,098
|
|
Total identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
27,582
|
|
|
Purchase price including direct costs of
acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
and
net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
46,809
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
19,227
|
|
|
The completed
technology, non-competition agreements, and customer relationships are being
amortized over weighted-average useful lives of 20 years, 7 years, and 5 years,
respectively.
The goodwill
associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes. The
goodwill associated with this transaction was subsequently written off as part
of the goodwill impairment charges recorded in 2008 (see Note 5).
F-21
Note 4 – Acquisition and Divestiture
Activities (continued)
As part of its
acquisition of PM Group in 2007, the Business transferred certain manufacturing
operations from Bradford, United Kingdom to the People’s Republic of China and
the Republic of China (Taiwan). The costs associated with these transfers
totaled $311,000 and were included in the cost of acquisition of PM Group under
then-applicable accounting standards. Substantially all of these restructuring
costs were paid during 2007.
Pro Forma Results
The unaudited pro
forma results would have been as follows, assuming the acquisitions had occurred
at the beginning of each period presented
(in thousands):
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Pro forma net revenues
|
|
$
|
245,313
|
|
|
$
|
254,807
|
Pro forma net earnings attributable to Parent
|
|
$
|
(74,128
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,831
|
|
The pro forma
information reflects adjustments to depreciation based on the fair value of
property and equipment acquired, adjustments to amortization based on the fair
value of intangible assets, and related tax effects, as well as the inclusion of
Vishay Transducers India, Ltd. in the combined and consolidated financial
statements as a wholly owned subsidiary rather than an equity-method
investment.
The unaudited pro
forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been
attained had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods
presented.
F-22
Note 5 – Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets
Goodwill represents
the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of the net
assets acquired at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but rather
tested for impairment at least annually. The Business performs its annual
impairment test as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. These
impairment tests must be performed more frequently if there are triggering
events.
ASC 350,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other
, prescribes a two-step method for determining
goodwill impairment. In the first step, the Business determines the fair value
of the reporting unit and compares that fair value to the net book value of the
reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using various
valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis (an income
approach) and a comparable companies market multiple approach.
To measure the amount
of the impairment, ASC 350 prescribes that the Business determine the implied
fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if the Business had acquired those
reporting units. Specifically, the Business must allocate the fair value of the
reporting unit to all of the assets of that unit, including any unrecognized
intangible assets, in a hypothetical calculation that would yield the implied
fair value of goodwill. The impairment loss is measured as the difference
between the book value of the goodwill and the implied fair value of the
goodwill computed in step two.
Vishay
Intertechnology evaluated the goodwill associated with the Business as a
separate reporting unit for ASC 350 evaluation purposes. For the purposes of the
combined and consolidated financial statements presented on a stand-alone basis,
the Business has evaluated its goodwill using its operating segments, namely,
Foil Technology Products and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, as its
reporting units.
In light of a
sustained decline in market capitalization for Vishay Intertechnology and its
peer group companies, and other factors, Vishay Intertechnology determined that
an interim impairment test was necessary as of the end of the second, third, and
fourth fiscal quarters of 2008.
Based on Vishay
Intertechnology’s interim impairment tests performed as of the end of the
second, third, and fourth quarters of 2008, the Business performed retrospective
goodwill impairment tests for its reporting units as of the end of the second,
third, and fourth quarters of 2008.
After completing step
one of the impairment tests as of June 28, 2008 and as of September 27, 2008,
the Business determined that the estimated fair value of its reporting units
were greater than the book values of those units, and accordingly, no second
step was required as of those dates.
Given the further
deterioration of market conditions in the fourth quarter of 2008, an additional
impairment test was performed as of December 31, 2008 (the end of the fourth
fiscal quarter). After completing step one of the impairment test as of December
31, 2008, the Business determined that the estimated fair value of each of its
reporting units was less than the net book values of those reporting units. This
required the completion of the second step of the impairment evaluation. Upon
completion of the step two analysis, the Business recorded impairment charges.
Subsequent to recording these impairment charges, there was no remaining
goodwill recorded on the combined and consolidated balance sheet.
F-23
Note 5 – Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (continued)
The determination of
the fair value of the reporting units and the allocation of that value to
individual assets and liabilities within those reporting units requires the
Business to make significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to: the selection of
appropriate comparable companies; control premiums appropriate for acquisitions
in the industries in which the Business competes; the discount rate; terminal
growth rates; and forecasts of revenue, operating income, depreciation and
amortization, and capital expenditures. The allocation requires several analyses
to determine fair value of assets and liabilities including, among others,
completed technology, trade names, in-process research and development, customer
relationships, and certain property and equipment (valued at replacement
costs).
Due to the inherent
uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual financial results could
differ from those estimates. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial
results or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on
either the fair value of the reporting unit or the amount of the goodwill
impairment charge.
The goodwill
impairment charge is noncash in nature and does not affect the Business’s
liquidity, cash flows from operating activities, and will not have a material
impact on future operations.
The changes in the
carrying amounts of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
Foil Technology
|
|
Weighing Modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
& Control Systems
|
|
Total
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
4,181
|
|
|
$
|
61,590
|
|
|
$
|
65,771
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,227
|
|
|
|
19,227
|
|
Currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
81,580
|
|
|
|
86,016
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the
year
|
|
|
9,893
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
15,127
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(13,199
|
)
|
|
|
(80,266
|
)
|
|
|
(93,465
|
)
|
Currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
|
(6,548
|
)
|
|
|
(7,678
|
)
|
Balance at December
31, 2008
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
F-24
Note 5 – Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (continued)
Other intangible
assets were as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Intangible Assets Subject to
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Definite-lived):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and acquired technology
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
6,506
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
|
|
14,707
|
|
|
|
|
27,576
|
|
|
|
27,042
|
|
Accumulated
amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and acquired technology
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
(2,670
|
)
|
|
|
(1,882
|
)
|
Trade names
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
(4,527
|
)
|
|
|
(2,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,359
|
)
|
|
|
(6,879
|
)
|
Net Intangible Assets Subject
to Amortization
|
|
$
|
17,217
|
|
|
$
|
20,163
|
|
|
Amortization expense
was $3,019,000, $2,441,000, and $1,667,000, for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Estimated annual
amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows
(in thousands)
:
2010
|
|
$
|
3,049
|
2011
|
|
|
3,036
|
2012
|
|
|
2,841
|
2013
|
|
|
2,289
|
2014
|
|
|
1,847
|
As part of certain
acquisitions, the Business entered into non-competition agreements with certain
employees, former employees, and owners of acquired companies. Some payments
under these agreements are made over the noncompetition period. At December 31,
2009 and 2008, the Business had liabilities of $2,298,000 and $3,014,000,
respectively, pursuant to these agreements.
F-25
Note 6 – Restructuring and Severance
Costs
Restructuring and
severance costs reflect the cost reduction programs implemented by the Business.
These include the closing of facilities and the termination of employees.
Restructuring and severance costs include one-time exit costs, severance
benefits pursuant to an on-going benefit arrangement recognized and related
pension curtailment and settlement charges recognized
.
Restructuring
costs are expensed during the period in which the Business determines it will
incur those costs and all requirements of accrual are met. Because these costs
are recorded based upon estimates, actual expenditures for the restructuring
activities may differ from the initially recorded costs. If the initial
estimates are too low or too high, the Business could be required either to
record additional expenses in future periods or to reverse part of the
previously recorded charges. Asset write-downs are principally related to
buildings and equipment that will not be used subsequent to the completion of
restructuring plans presently being implemented, and cannot be sold for amounts
in excess of carrying value.
The following table
summarizes our restructuring programs during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007
(in thousands):
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Response to global recession
|
|
$
|
2,048
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
$
|
-
|
Closure of Breda, the Netherlands facility
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
-
|
Downsizing of City of Industry,
California facility
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
247
|
Miscellaneous other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
109
|
Total restructuring expense
|
|
$
|
2,048
|
|
$
|
6,349
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
Restructuring Programs in Response to Global Economic Recession
In response to the
economic downturn during the latter half of 2008 and 2009, the Business
undertook significant measures to cut costs. This included a strict adaptation
of manufacturing capacity to sellable volume and limiting the building of
product for inventory. The Business incurred employee termination costs covering
technical, production, administrative, and support employees located in nearly
every country in which the Business operates.
The following table
summarizes activity to date related to restructuring programs in response to the
global economic recession
(in thousands, except for number of employees):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Exit Costs
|
|
Total
|
|
Terminated
|
Restructuring and severance
costs
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
|
170
|
|
Utilized
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
100
|
|
Restructuring and severance
costs
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
199
|
|
Utilized
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(2,026
|
)
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2009
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
F-26
Note 6 – Restructuring and Severance Costs
(continued)
Most of the accrued
restructuring liability, included in other accrued expenses, is expected to be
paid by December 31, 2010. The payment terms related to these restructuring
programs varies, usually based on local customs and laws. Most severance amounts
are paid in a lump sum at termination, while some payments are structured to be
paid in installments.
Closure of Breda, the Netherlands Facility
During 2008, we
announced the closure of our load cell manufacturing facility in Breda, the
Netherlands, and transferred all manufacturing operations to
Israel.
The following table
summarizes activity to date related to the closure of the Breda
(in thousands, except for number of employees):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Exit Costs
|
|
Total
|
|
Terminated
|
Restructuring and severance
costs
|
|
$
|
5,524
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
5,705
|
|
|
42
|
|
Utilized
|
|
|
(3,820
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(3,953
|
)
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,272
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
1,318
|
|
|
2
|
|
Utilized
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(1,318
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
City of Industry, California Facility Downsizing
During 2007, the
Business transferred significant load cell manufacturing operations from our
City of Industry, California facility to existing facilities in the People’s
Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and Israel. The Business
incurred $247,000 of restructuring and severance costs associated with this
program, substantially all of which was paid during 2007.
F-27
Note 7 – Income
Taxes
Income taxes for the
Business as presented in these combined and consolidated financial statements
are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although the Business’s
operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S.
federal and certain state tax returns, and United Kingdom “group relief,”
available to entities under common control, has been claimed. Vishay
Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire
portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, tax results as presented for the Business
in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of future
performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would
have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods
presented.
Certain dedicated
entities have taxes payable to the local taxing authorities, but the Business
does not maintain taxes payable to/from parent in those jurisdictions where the
taxable incomes are combined or offset. Accordingly, the Business is deemed to
settle the annual current tax balances immediately with the legal tax-paying
entities in the respective jurisdictions. These settlements are reflected as
changes in parent net investment on the combined and consolidated balance
sheets.
Income (loss) from
continuing operations before taxes and non-controlling interests consists of the
following components
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
6,365
|
|
$
|
(7,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,245
|
Foreign
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
(60,952
|
)
|
|
|
29,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,778
|
|
$
|
(68,426
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,632
|
|
Significant
components of income taxes are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
3,027
|
|
|
$
|
1,389
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,761
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
6,212
|
|
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
8,851
|
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
|
953
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(3,162
|
)
|
|
|
780
|
|
Total income tax
expense
|
|
$
|
5,057
|
|
|
$
|
5,689
|
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
F-28
Note 7 – Income Taxes
(continued)
Deferred income taxes
reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
amounts for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Business’s
deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other retiree
obligations
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
|
$
|
2,907
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforwards
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
Tax
credit carryforwards
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other accruals and
reserves
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
15,475
|
|
|
|
14,571
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(7,002
|
)
|
|
|
(4,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
8,473
|
|
|
|
10,283
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
over book depreciation
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
Intangible assets other than
goodwill
|
|
|
5,042
|
|
|
|
5,203
|
|
Other - net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
Total gross deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
5,960
|
|
|
|
8,085
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
assets
|
|
$
|
2,513
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
The Business makes
significant judgments regarding the realizability of its deferred tax assets
(principally net operating losses). In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the
carrying value of the net deferred tax asset is based on the Business’s
assessment that it is more likely than not that the Business will realize these
assets after consideration of all available positive and negative evidence.
A reconciliation of
income tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to actual
income tax provision is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
2,372
|
|
$
|
(23,949
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,821
|
|
State income taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Effect of foreign operations
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
|
(4,269
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
31,797
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Total income tax
expense
|
|
$
|
5,057
|
|
$
|
5,689
|
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
F-29
Note 7 – Income Taxes
(continued)
At December 31, 2009,
the Business had the following significant net operating loss carryforwards for
tax purposes
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
Expires
|
Belgium
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
No expiration
|
Israel
|
|
|
15,649
|
|
No expiration
|
Japan
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
2010-2016
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
No expiration
|
UK
|
|
|
3,775
|
|
No
expiration
|
At December 31, 2009,
no provision has been made for U.S. federal and state income taxes on
approximately $81.7 million of foreign earnings, which the Business expects to
be reinvested outside of the United States indefinitely. Upon distribution of
those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Business would be
subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits),
state income taxes, incremental foreign income taxes, and withholding taxes
payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the amount of
unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of
the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.
Income taxes paid,
net of amounts refunded, were $2,690,000, $11,693,000, and $8,182,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. In taxing
jurisdictions where the Business was previously included in a consolidated tax
return with Vishay Intertechnology, the amount of income taxes paid includes
amounts deemed to be paid to the legal tax-paying entities in the respective
jurisdictions.
The Business and its
subsidiaries are, or will be, subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous
foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax
positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary
course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the
ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Business establishes reserves for
tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to
which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves are established when the
Business believes that certain positions might be challenged despite its belief
that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Business adjusts these
reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances and the provision for
income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves
that are considered appropriate. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there are no
reserves because the Business has been fully indemnified by Vishay
Intertechnology.
F-30
Note 8 –
Indebtedness
Net Payable to Affiliates
The net amount
payable to Vishay Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined
scope of the Business primarily reflects balances carried forward from funding
provided by Vishay Intertechnology to make certain acquisitions, to retire
certain debt assumed in acquisitions, or as part of Vishay Intertechnology’s
global working capital allocation strategy.
As further described
in Note 3, throughout the period covered by the combined and consolidated
financial statements, the Business had significant agreements, transactions, and
relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope
of the Business. The net payable to affiliates also includes the effects of
these transactions.
Effective as of the
spin-off, the Business will utilize a portion of the cash on hand that was
generated by the Business to repay this intercompany debt with Vishay
Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined scope of the
Business. Accordingly, at December 31, 2009, the net payable to affiliates is
presented as a current liability. At December 31, 2008, the net payable to
affiliates is presented as a noncurrent liability.
The combined and
consolidated financial statements include charges for interest based on the
prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility,
or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities. Interest
expense on the net amount payable to affiliates was $1,168,000, $1,517,000, and
$2,106,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. Of these
amounts, $500,000, $900,000, and $1,500,000 were not historically charged by
Vishay Intertechnology to the Business, and accordingly, these amounts of
imputed interest are reflected as an increase to parent net investment on the
combined and consolidated balance sheet. The remaining interest expense was
charged to the Business and paid in accordance with local statutory
requirements.
Third-party Debt
Long-term debt
payable to third parties consists of debt held by the Business’s Japanese
subsidiary.
Annual maturities of
third-party debt are as follows
(in thousands):
2010
|
|
$
|
184
|
2011
|
|
|
-
|
2012
|
|
|
-
|
2013
|
|
|
776
|
2014
|
|
|
129
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
646
|
Interest paid on
third-party debt during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was
not material.
Credit Lines
At December 31, 2009
and 2008, certain subsidiaries of the Business had committed and uncommitted
short-term credit lines with various foreign banks aggregating approximately
$2,000,000. The outstanding balances related to these arrangements is presented
as “notes payable to banks” on the combined and consolidated balance
sheet.
The Business expects
to enter into a revolving credit facility with a consortium of banks to provide
it with flexibility and additional liquidity shortly after the
separation.
F-31
Note 8 –
Indebtedness (continued)
Exchangeable Notes of Vishay Intertechnology
On December 13, 2002, Vishay Intertechnology
issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or principal) amount of its floating rate
unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102 in connection with an acquisition.
The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay Intertechnology on
December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of December 13,
2002. The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange for
shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called by
Vishay Intertechnology for similar consideration.
Under the terms of the put and call agreement,
by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is required to take action so
that the existing notes are deemed exchanged as of the date of the spin-off, for
a combination of new notes of Vishay Intertechnology and notes issued by Vishay
Precision Group, Inc.
Except for Vishay Intertechnology’s contractual
obligation to issue new notes of any spin-off company, these notes have no
direct historical connection to the Business. Accordingly, these
exchangeable notes are not included in the historical combined and consolidated
financial statements. Furthermore, the exact amount of the liability to be
assumed by Vishay Precision Group, Inc. under the exchangeable notes will not be
known until ten trading days after the spin-off.
Note 9 – Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
The cumulative
balance of each component of other comprehensive income (loss) and the income
tax effects allocated to each component are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Before-Tax
|
|
Tax
|
|
Net-of-Tax
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Amount
|
|
Effect
|
|
Amount
|
|
Balance
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial
items
|
|
$
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
(233
|
)
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
(799
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment
for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognition of actuarial items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,116
|
|
|
$
|
(281
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial
items
|
|
$
|
(714
|
)
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment
for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognition of actuarial items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,568
|
)
|
|
|
(12,501
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
(14,524
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,196
|
)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial
items
|
|
$
|
(695
|
)
|
|
$
|
(897
|
)
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
(544
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,239
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment
for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognition of actuarial items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(12,501
|
)
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
(7,978
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(13,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,702
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
4,028
|
|
|
$
|
(9,168
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss) includes the Business’s proportionate share of other comprehensive
income (loss) of nonconsolidated subsidiaries accounted for under the equity
method.
F-32
Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits
Defined Benefit Plans
Employees of the
Business participate in various defined benefit pension and other postretirement
benefit plans.
Certain subsidiaries
that comprise the Business offer defined benefit pension plans to their
employees, which are reflected in the accompanying combined and consolidated
financial statements.
Certain employees of
the Business in the United States and the United Kingdom have historically
participated in defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans sponsored
by Vishay Intertechnology. The annual cost of the Vishay Intertechnology defined
benefit plans is allocated to all of the participating businesses based upon a
specific actuarial computation, and accordingly, are reflected in the
accompanying combined and consolidated statements of operations.
The Business will
assume most of the obligations for employees in the United States and the United
Kingdom that will be employed by the Business after the spin-off, and
accordingly, those obligations are included in the Business’s combined and
consolidated balance sheets. An allocation of plan assets is also reflected in
the disclosures below.
Vishay
Intertechnology’s principal qualified U.S. pension plan, the Vishay
Intertechnology Retirement Plan (“VRP”), was frozen effective January 1, 2009.
Due to the freeze of the VRP, participants no longer accrue benefits. Given the
frozen nature of the VRP, participants who will become employees of the Business
after the spin-off will become terminated, vested participants of the VRP as of
the spin-off date and Vishay Intertechnology will retain the pension
obligations, the amount of which is not material.
Employees who
participated in the Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan will be
transferred into the newly created Vishay Precision Group Nonqualified
Retirement Plan. The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was a
contributory pension plan designed to provide similar defined benefits to
covered U.S. employees whose benefits under the Vishay Intertechnology
Retirement Plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code.
The Vishay
Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective January 1,
2009, and participants no longer accrue benefits.
The Vishay
Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan, like all nonqualified plans, is
considered to be unfunded. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified
trust, referred to as a “rabbi” trust, to fund benefits under this plan. Rabbi
trust assets are subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not
the property of employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent
assets. Vishay Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly
created rabbi trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance
sheets include allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $1,220,000 and
$1,069,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which equals the pension
liability at those dates.
F-33
Note 10 – Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits (continued)
The following table
sets forth a reconciliation of the benefit obligation, plan assets, and funded
status related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans
(in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Change in benefit
obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,508
|
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
|
$
|
18,284
|
|
|
$
|
2,046
|
|
Service cost (adjusted for
actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employee contributions)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Contributions by participants
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(2,354
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefit obligation at
end of year
|
|
$
|
14,358
|
|
|
$
|
2,353
|
|
|
$
|
11,508
|
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of year
|
|
$
|
6,640
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,419
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,992
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Contributions by participants
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,330
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fair value of plan
assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,674
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,640
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Funded status at end of
year
|
|
$
|
(5,684
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,106
|
)
|
|
F-34
Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits (continued)
Amounts recognized in
the combined and consolidated balance sheet consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(5,684
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,106
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,945
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial items
consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Unrecognized net actuarial
loss
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
$
|
52
|
Unamortized transition obligation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table
sets forth additional information regarding the projected and accumulated
benefit obligations for the pension plans
(in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Accumulated benefit obligation, all
plans
|
|
$
|
13,575
|
|
$
|
10,860
|
|
Plans for which the accumulated
benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
obligation exceeds plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
14,240
|
|
$
|
11,377
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
13,516
|
|
|
10,812
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
6,564
|
F-35
Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits (continued)
The following table
sets forth the components of net periodic cost of pension and other
postretirement benefit plans
(in thousands):
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Annual service cost
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
Less employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contributions
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
-
|
Net service cost
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
40
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
112
|
Expected return on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plan assets
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
Amortization of actuarial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
losses (gains)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
38
|
Curtailment and settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
losses (gains)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 9 for the
pretax, tax effect, and after tax amounts included in other comprehensive income
during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. The estimated
actuarial items that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
into net periodic pension cost during 2010 approximate the amounts amortized in
2009.
The following
weighted-average assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at
December 31 of the respective years:
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.70%
|
|
|
|
5.75%
|
|
|
|
5.84%
|
|
|
|
6.25%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.24%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
|
2.66%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
The following
weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the net periodic pension
costs for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.84%
|
|
|
|
6.25%
|
|
|
|
5.55%
|
|
|
|
6.25%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.66%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
|
2.92%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
5.88%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
|
6.39%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
The impact of a
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the net
periodic benefit cost and postretirement benefit obligation is not
material.
F-36
Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits (continued)
The plan’s expected
return on assets is based on management’s expectation of long-term average rates
of return to be achieved by the underlying investment portfolios. In
establishing this assumption, management considers historical and expected
returns for the asset classes in which the plans are invested, advice from
pension consultants and investment advisors, and current economic and capital
market conditions.
The investment mix
between equity securities and fixed income securities is based upon achieving a
desired return, balancing higher return, more volatile equity securities, and
lower return, less volatile fixed income securities.
Plan assets are
comprised of:
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Equity securities
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
-
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
-
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future
benefit payments are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
2010
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
$
|
169
|
2011
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
169
|
2012
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
169
|
2013
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
169
|
2014
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
169
|
2015-2019
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
845
|
The Business
anticipates making contributions to its pension and postretirement benefit plans
of approximately $700,000 during 2010.
F-37
Note 10 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits (continued)
Other Retirement Obligations
The Business
participates in various other defined contribution and government-mandated
retirement plans based on local law or custom. The Business periodically makes
required contributions for certain of these plans. At December 31, 2009 and
2008, the combined and consolidated balance sheets include $2,512,000 and
$2,934,000, respectively, within accrued pension and other
postretirement costs related to these plans.
Most of the
Business’s U.S. employees are eligible to participate in 401(k) savings plans
which provide company matching under various formulas. Concurrent with the
freezing of U.S. pension benefits effective January 1, 2009, the company-match
percentage for affected employees was increased. The Business’s matching expense
for the plans was $744,000, $604,000, and $649,000 for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. No material amounts are included in the
combined and consolidated balance sheets related to unfunded 401(k)
contributions.
Certain key employees
participate in a deferred compensation plan sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology.
These employees will be transferred to a newly created deferred compensation
plan of the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets
include a liability within other noncurrent liabilities related to these
deferrals. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified trust, referred to as
a “rabbi” trust, to fund payments under this plan. Rabbi trust assets are
subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not the property of
employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent assets. Vishay
Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly created rabbi
trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance sheets include
allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $2,295,000 and $1,912,000 at December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Assets held in trust are intended to
approximate the Business’s liability under this plan.
F-38
Note 11 – Share-Based
Compensation
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains various stockholder-approved programs which allow for
the grant of share-based compensation to officers, directors, and employees,
including employees of the Business. The following disclosures represent the
portion of the Vishay Intertechnology programs in which employees of the
Business participated.
Vishay
Intertechnology common stock underlies all awards granted under these programs.
Accordingly, the amounts presented are not necessarily indicative of future
performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would
have experienced as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods
presented.
Outstanding Vishay
Intertechnology equity awards held by employees of the Business generally will
expire at or within 60 days of the spin-off. The Business expects to issue
replacement awards based on its own common stock after the
spin-off.
The amount of
compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions is measured based
on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued. The fair value of
each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The Business determines compensation cost for restricted
stock units (“RSUs”) and phantom stock units based on the grant-date fair value
of the underlying common stock. Compensation cost is recognized over the period
that the participant provides service in exchange for the award.
The following table
summarizes share-based compensation expense recognized
(in thousands):
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Vishay stock options
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
76
|
Vishay restricted stock units
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Vishay phantom stock units
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
69
|
Total
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation
(continued)
Stock Options
The following table
summarizes Vishay Intertechnology stock option activity of the Business’s
employees
(number of options in
thousands)
:
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Number
of
Vishay
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
of
Vishay
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
of
Vishay
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
18.26
|
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
18.22
|
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
14.72
|
Granted
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
14.25
|
Exercised
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
5.92
|
Cancelled
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
15.33
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
End of year
|
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
20.24
|
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
18.26
|
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
18.22
|
|
Vested and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected to
vest
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the options
outstanding at January 1, 2007 were granted in 1998, 1999, and 2000. These
options vested over a six-year period.
The following table
summarizes information concerning stock options outstanding and exercisable at
December 31, 2009
(number of options in
thousands)
:
Ranges of
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
$8.98
|
|
6
|
|
1
|
$13.46 -
$16.46
|
|
37
|
|
19
|
$25.13
|
|
59
|
|
59
|
Total
|
|
102
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation
(continued)
The fair value of
each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. There were no options granted in 2009. Options granted in
2008 and 2007 had a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $5.04 and $8.27,
respectively. The following weighted-average assumptions were incorporated into
the model used to value the options granted in 2008 and 2007:
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
Grants
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
The expected life of
the options was estimated based on historical experience for a group of
employees similar to the respective grantees. The expected volatility was
estimated based on historical volatility over a period equal to the expected
life of the options.
The pretax aggregate
intrinsic value (the difference between the closing stock price of Vishay
Intertechnology common stock on the last trading day of 2009 of $8.35 per share
and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that
would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised
their options on December 31, 2009 is zero, because all outstanding options have
exercise prices in excess of market value. This amount changes based on changes
in the market value of the Vishay Intertechnology’s common stock. No options
were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
was $4,000 and $783,000, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units and Phantom Stock Units
Vishay
Intertechnology RSUs granted to employees of the Business totaled 10,000 in
2009. At December 31, 2009, 6,668 of these RSUs are unvested.
Vishay
Intertechnology phantom stock units granted to employees of the Business totaled
5,000 in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. At December
31, 2009, employees of the Business hold 30,000 phantom stock units, which will
be converted into Vishay Intertechnology common stock upon completion of the
spin-off.
F-41
Note 12 – Commitments, Contingencies, and
Concentrations
Leases
The Business uses
various leased facilities and equipment in its operations. In the normal course
of business, operating leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases.
Certain operating leases include escalation clauses.
Total rental expense
under operating leases was $3,624,000, $3,851,000, and $3,413,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Future minimum lease
payments for operating leases with initial or remaining noncancelable lease
terms in excess of one year are as follows
(in thousands)
:
2010
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
2011
|
|
|
1,617
|
2012
|
|
|
1,033
|
2013
|
|
|
133
|
2014
|
|
|
88
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
-
|
Litigation
The Business is a
party to various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business.
The Business is of the opinion that these litigations or claims will not have a
material negative effect on its consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Executive Employment Agreements
Vishay
Intertechnology has employment agreements with certain of its senior executives
who will transfer to the Business. These employment agreements provide
incremental compensation in the event of termination. Vishay Intertechnology
does not provide any severance or other benefits specifically upon a change in
control.
Sources of Supplies
Although most
materials incorporated in the Business’s products are available from a number of
sources, certain materials are available only from a relatively limited number
of suppliers.
Some of the most
highly specialized materials for the Business’s sensors are sourced from a
single vendor. The Business maintains a safety stock inventory of critical
materials, and has entered into consignment arrangements with certain vendors to
assure the availability of critical materials at its facilities.
Certain metals used
in the manufacture of our products are traded on active markets, and can be
subject to significant price volatility.
Purchase Commitments
The Business has
various purchase commitments incidental to the ordinary conduct of business.
Such commitments are at prices which are not in excess of current market
prices.
F-42
Note 12 – Commitments, Contingencies, and
Concentrations (continued)
Market Concentrations
No single customer
comprises greater than 10% of net revenues.
The vast majority of
the Business’s products are used in the broad industrial market, with selected
uses in military/aerospace, automotive, and to much lesser extent, consumer
products. Within the industrial segment, the Business’s products serve wide
applications in the waste management, bulk hauling, logging, scale, engineering
systems, pharmaceutical, oil, chemical, steel, paper, and food
industries.
Credit Risk Concentrations
Financial instruments
with potential credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, and notes receivable. The Business maintains cash and cash
equivalents with various major financial institutions. Concentrations of credit
risk with respect to receivables are generally limited due to the Business’s
large number of customers and their dispersion across many countries and
industries. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Business had no significant
concentrations of credit risk.
Geographic Concentration
The Business has
significant manufacturing operations in Israel in order to benefit from that
country’s various tax abatement programs, lower wage rates, highly skilled labor
force, and government-sponsored grants. Israeli incentive programs have
contributed substantially to the growth and profitability of the Business. The
Business might be materially and adversely affected if these incentive programs
were no longer available to the Business or if events were to occur in the
Middle East that materially interfered with the Business’s operations in
Israel.
Warranty and Other Indemnification
Obligations
The Business provides a limited
warranty to its customers. The nature of the warranty is generally in the form
of replacement of a defective product, although the Business periodically
receives claims that arise from consequential damages which result from a
customer’s installation of an allegedly defective component manufactured by the
Business into the customer’s product. Although not covered by its stated
warranty, the Business may occasionally reimburse the customer for these
consequential damages. Annual warranty expenses and related obligations were not
material to the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
Except for the warranty and related
obligations described above, the Business has no other indemnification
obligations to its customers.
F-43
Note 13 – Segment and Geographic
Data
The Business operates
in two product segments: Foil Technology Products, which include foil resistors
and strain gages, and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, which include load
cells, instruments, and complete systems for process control or on-board
weighing applications.
The Business
evaluates operating segment performance on operating income, exclusive of
certain items. Management believes that evaluating segment performance excluding
items such as restructuring and severance costs, goodwill impairment charges,
and other items is meaningful because it provides insight with respect to
intrinsic operating results of the Business. The accounting policies of the
segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant
accounting policies (see Note 2). Operating segment assets are the owned or
allocated assets used by each segment. Products are transferred between segments
on a basis intended to reflect, as nearly as practicable, the market value of
the products.
The following table
sets forth operating segment information
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Weighing Modules
|
|
Foil Technology
|
|
Corporate/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Control Systems
|
|
Products
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net third-party revenues
|
|
$
|
100,120
|
|
$
|
71,871
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
171,991
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
22,282
|
|
|
30,423
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,705
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
4,066
|
|
|
18,444
|
|
|
(15,209
|
)
|
|
|
7,301
|
|
Restructuring and severance costs
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,446
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
115,187
|
|
|
94,592
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
209,779
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net third-party revenues
|
|
$
|
148,796
|
|
$
|
92,904
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
241,700
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
(3,057
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
37,304
|
|
|
42,592
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79,896
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
12,821
|
|
|
27,749
|
|
|
(112,202
|
)
|
|
|
(71,632
|
)
|
Restructuring and severance costs
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,349
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
80,266
|
|
|
13,199
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93,465
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,410
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
153,491
|
|
|
101,372
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
254,863
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net third-party revenues
|
|
$
|
144,736
|
|
$
|
94,300
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
239,036
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
38,297
|
|
|
46,214
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84,511
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
32,399
|
|
|
(11,658
|
)
|
|
|
36,138
|
|
Restructuring and severance costs
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,130
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
229,017
|
|
|
90,964
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
319,981
|
|
F-44
Note 13 – Segment and Geographic Data
(continued)
The “Corporate/Other”
column for segment operating income (loss) includes unallocated selling,
general, and administrative expenses and certain items which management excludes
from segment results when evaluating segment performance, as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Unallocated selling, general, and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
(13,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,388
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,302
|
)
|
Restructuring and severance costs
|
|
|
(2,048
|
)
|
|
|
(6,349
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(93,465
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following
geographic data include net revenues based on revenues generated by subsidiaries
located within that geographic area and property and equipment based on physical
location
(in thousands)
:
Net
Revenues
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
United States
|
|
$
|
58,795
|
|
|
$
|
80,449
|
|
|
$
|
88,989
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
26,568
|
|
|
|
40,851
|
|
|
|
39,922
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
51,454
|
|
|
|
73,038
|
|
|
|
67,968
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
17,899
|
|
|
|
23,898
|
|
|
|
22,003
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
17,275
|
|
|
|
23,464
|
|
|
|
20,154
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,991
|
|
|
$
|
241,700
|
|
|
$
|
239,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment - Net
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
United States
|
|
$
|
5,124
|
|
$
|
6,214
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
6,267
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
1,309
|
Israel
|
|
|
17,162
|
|
|
18,908
|
Asia
|
|
|
14,715
|
|
|
17,883
|
Other
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
44,599
|
|
$
|
50,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
Note 14 – Additional Financial Statement
Information
The caption “Other”
on the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Years ended December
31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
|
$
|
872
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Income recognized on the equity
method
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
4,780
|
|
|
$
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inventories
consist of the following
(in thousands
)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
13,341
|
|
$
|
15,584
|
Work in process
|
|
|
13,214
|
|
|
17,519
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
17,247
|
|
|
24,889
|
|
|
$
|
43,802
|
|
$
|
57,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and
equipment consists of the following
(in thousands
)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
2,003
|
|
|
$
|
2,448
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
38,486
|
|
|
|
37,425
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
64,681
|
|
|
|
63,305
|
|
Software
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
3,504
|
|
Projects in process
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(64,516
|
)
|
|
|
(57,276
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
44,599
|
|
|
$
|
50,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued
expenses consist of the following
(in thousands
)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
Goods received, not yet invoiced
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
1,190
|
Other
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
4,277
|
|
|
$
|
4,573
|
|
$
|
6,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
Note 15 – Fair Value
Measurements
The Business adopted
ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures,
for financial
assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008, and for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities as of January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material effect
on the Business’s financial position, results of operations, or
liquidity.
ASC Topic 820
establishes a valuation hierarchy of the inputs used to measure fair value. This
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair
value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those
three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the Business’s own
assumptions.
An asset or
liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The following table
provides the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on
a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements at reporting
date using:
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
Assets held in rabbi trusts
|
|
$
|
3,515
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Defined benefit pension plan
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains nonqualified trusts, referred to as “rabbi” trusts, to
fund payments under deferred compensation and nonqualified pension plans, and
the Business will establish similar trusts to continue these programs. Vishay
Intertechnology will contribute assets to the Business’s rabbi trust prior to
the spin-off in an amount that approximates the Business’s liability under these
arrangements. The assets above are based on a pro rata allocation of the Vishay
Intertechnology rabbi trust assets, but the actual assets transferred may
differ. Rabbi trust assets consist primarily of marketable securities,
classified as available-for-sale and company-owned life insurance assets. The
marketable securities held in the rabbi trusts are valued using quoted market
prices on the last business day of the year. The company-owned life insurance
assets are valued in consultation with Vishay Intertechnology’s insurance
brokers using the value of underlying assets of the insurance contracts. The
fair value measurement of the marketable securities held in the rabbi trust is
considered a Level 1 measurement and the measurement of the company-owned life
insurance assets is considered a Level 2 measurement within the fair value
hierarchy.
F-47
Note 15 – Fair Value Measurements
(continued)
The Business
maintains defined benefit retirement plans in certain of its subsidiaries. The
assets of the plans are measured at fair value.
Equity securities
held by the defined benefit retirement plans consist of equity securities that
are valued based on quoted market prices on the last business day of the year.
The fair value measurement of the equity securities is considered a Level 1
measurement within the fair value hierarchy.
Fixed income
securities held by the defined benefit retirement plans consist of government
bonds and corporate notes that are valued based on quoted market prices on the
last business day of the year. The fair value measurement of the fixed income
securities is considered a Level 1 measurement within the fair value
hierarchy.
Cash held by the
defined benefit retirement plans consists of deposits on account in various
financial institutions. The carrying amount of the cash approximates its fair
value.
The Business’s
financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
long-term notes receivable, short-term notes payable, accounts payable, and
long-term debt. The carrying amounts for these financial instruments reported in
the combined and consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair
values.
F-48
Unaudited interim combined and consolidated
financial statements
as of April 3, 2010 and for the fiscal
quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
Combined and Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
F-51
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
F-52
|
Combined and Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
F-53
|
Combined and Consolidated Statement of Equity
|
F-54
|
Notes to Combined and Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
F-55
|
F-49
This page intentionally left
blank.
F-50
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
|
April 3,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
80,421
|
|
|
$
|
63,192
|
|
Accounts receivable,
net
|
|
25,212
|
|
|
|
23,345
|
|
Net
inventories
|
|
45,010
|
|
|
|
43,802
|
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
4,984
|
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
4,522
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
160,960
|
|
|
|
139,821
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
44,236
|
|
|
|
44,599
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
16,244
|
|
|
|
17,217
|
|
Other assets
|
|
8,440
|
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
229,880
|
|
|
$
|
209,779
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to banks
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Trade accounts
payable
|
|
6,942
|
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
Net
payable to affiliates
|
|
33,443
|
|
|
|
18,495
|
|
Payroll and related
expenses
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
|
6,619
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
6,119
|
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
54,968
|
|
|
|
37,332
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current
portion
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
5,985
|
|
|
|
5,993
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
6,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
Accrued pension and other postretirement costs
|
|
10,442
|
|
|
|
10,549
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
79,267
|
|
|
|
61,566
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent net
investment
|
|
162,710
|
|
|
|
157,258
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(12,231
|
)
|
|
|
(9,168
|
)
|
Total Parent equity
|
|
150,479
|
|
|
|
148,090
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Total equity
|
|
150,613
|
|
|
|
148,213
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
229,880
|
|
|
$
|
209,779
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-51
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited - In thousands)
|
Fiscal quarters
ended
|
|
April 3,
|
|
March 28,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
48,175
|
|
|
$
|
43,705
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
31,127
|
|
|
|
29,654
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
17,048
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
|
|
13,207
|
|
|
|
11,024
|
|
Restructuring and severance costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Operating income
|
|
3,841
|
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
Other
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
Other income (expense) - net
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Less: net earnings attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Net earnings attributable to
Parent
|
$
|
1,776
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-52
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited - In thousands)
|
Three fiscal months
ended
|
|
April 3,
|
|
March 28,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
1,803
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
Inventory write-offs for
obsolescence
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Other
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of effects of businesses
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
(2,549
|
)
|
|
|
4,566
|
|
Inventories
|
|
(2,170
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
538
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
(1,948
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
4,857
|
|
|
|
5,052
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Net changes in short-term
borrowings
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
Distributions to non-controlling interests
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Transactions with Vishay
Intertechnology
|
|
16,023
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
15,884
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
17,229
|
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of year
|
|
63,192
|
|
|
|
70,381
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
80,421
|
|
|
$
|
73,287
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-53
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP,
INC.
Combined and
Consolidated Statement of Equity
(Unaudited - In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Parent
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
Total
|
|
Investment
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Equity
|
|
Interests
|
|
Equity
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
157,258
|
|
$
|
(9,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
148,090
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
148,213
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
-
|
|
|
(3,119
|
)
|
|
|
(3,119
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,119
|
)
|
Pension and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postretirement actuarial
items
|
|
-
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(1,260
|
)
|
Other transactions with Vishay - net
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
58
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Balance at April 3, 2010
|
$
|
162,710
|
|
$
|
(12,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
150,479
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
150,613
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-54
Vishay Precision Group,
Inc.
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements
Note 1 – Basis of
Presentation
Background
On October 27, 2009,
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (“Vishay Intertechnology”) announced that it
intends to spin off its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses into
an independent, publicly traded company to be named Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
(the “Business”). The spin-off is expected to take the form of a tax-free stock
dividend to Vishay Intertechnology’s stockholders.
The Business is an
international designer, manufacturer and marketer of Foil Technology Products
(strain gages, ultra-precision foil resistors, current sensors) and Weighing
Modules and Control Systems (load cells/transducers, instruments, weighing
modules, and control systems) for a wide variety of applications.
Carve-out Basis of Presentation
The Business is
currently part of Vishay Intertechnology and its assets and liabilities consist
of those that Vishay Intertechnology attributes to its precision measurement and
foil resistor businesses.
The Business is
conducted by various direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology.
In this context, no direct ownership relationship existed among the various
units comprising the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated
financial statements have been derived from Vishay Intertechnology’s historical
accounting records and are presented on a carve-out basis.
Before effecting the
spin-off, all assets and liabilities associated with the Business will be
contributed to Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
The combined and
consolidated statement of operations includes all revenues and expenses directly
attributable to the Business, including costs for facilities, functions, and
services used by the Business at shared sites and costs for certain functions
and services performed by centralized Vishay Intertechnology organizations
outside of the defined scope of the Business and directly charged to the
Business based on usage. The results of operations also include allocations of
(i) costs for administrative functions and services performed on behalf of the
Business by centralized staff groups within Vishay Intertechnology, (ii) Vishay
Intertechnology general corporate expenses, (iii) pension and other
postemployment benefit costs, (iv) interest expense, and (v) current and
deferred income taxes. See Notes 2, 4, 6, and 10 for a description of the
allocation methodologies utilized.
All of
the allocations and estimates in the accompanying combined and consolidated
financial statements are based on assumptions that Vishay Intertechnology
management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. However, these
allocations and estimates are not necessarily indicative of the costs and
expenses that would have resulted if the Business had been operated as a
separate entity.
All of the allocations and
estimates in the accompanying combined and consolidated financial statements are
based on assumptions that Vishay Intertechnology management believes are
reasonable, and reasonably approximate the historical costs that the Business
would have incurred as a separate entity for the same level of service or
support. However, these allocations and estimates are not necessarily
indicative of the costs and expenses that would have resulted if the Business
had been operated as a separate entity.
Following the spin-off, the
Business will incur incremental costs to both replace Vishay Intertechnology
support and to allow the Business to function as an independent, publicly-traded
company.
Actual costs that may have been incurred if the Business had
been a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the
chosen organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or performed by
employees, and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology
and infrastructure. Following the spin-off, the Business will perform these
functions using its own resources or purchases these services.
F-55
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Interim Financial Statements
These unaudited
combined and consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim
financial statements and therefore do not include all information and footnotes
necessary for the presentation of financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The information furnished
reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair summary of the financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the combined and consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, included
elsewhere in this information statement. The results of operations for the three
fiscal months ended April 3, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for the full year.
The Business reports
interim financial information for 13-week periods beginning on a Sunday and
ending on a Saturday, except for the first quarter, which always begins on
January 1, and the fourth quarter, which always ends on December 31. The four
fiscal quarters in 2010 end on April 3, 2010; July 3, 2010; October 2, 2010; and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The four fiscal quarters in 2009 ended on March
28, 2009; June 27, 2009; September 26, 2009; and December 31, 2009;
respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) updated the accounting guidance
related to fair value measurements disclosures. The updated guidance (i)
requires separate disclosure of significant transfers out of Levels 1 and 2 fair
value measurements, (ii) requires disclosure of Level 3 fair value measurements
activity on a gross basis, (iii) clarifies existing disaggregation requirements,
and (iv) clarifies existing input and valuation technique disclosure
requirements. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods after December 15, 2009, except for the Level 3 fair value measurement
disclosure requirements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010. The Business adopted the aspects of the guidance that are
currently effective as of January 1, 2010 and will adopt the remaining guidance
on January 1, 2011. The adoption of the effective guidance had no effect on the
Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity and the
adoption of the remaining guidance is not expected to have any effect on the
Business’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
F-56
Note 2 – Related Party
Transactions
Throughout the
periods covered by the combined and consolidated financial statements, the
Business had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay
Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of the Business. While
these transactions are not necessarily indicative of the terms the Business
would have achieved had the Business been a separate entity, management believes
they are reasonable.
Historically, the
Business has used the corporate services of Vishay Intertechnology for a variety
of functions including treasury, tax, legal, internal audit, human resources,
and risk management. After the spin-off, the Business will be an independent,
publicly traded company. The Business expects to incur additional costs
associated with being an independent, publicly traded company. These additional
anticipated costs are not reflected in its historical combined and consolidated
financial statements.
Sales Organizations
A portion of the
Business’s Foil Technology products are sold by the Vishay Intertechnology
worldwide sales organization, which operates as regionally-based legal entities.
The third-party sale of these products is presented in the combined and
consolidated financial statements as if it were made by the Business, although
legal entities outside of the defined scope of the Business actually made these
sales. Third-party sales made through the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales
organization totaled $3,618,000 and $3,530,000 during the fiscal quarters ended
April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
The selling entities
receive selling commissions on these sales. Commission rates are set at the
beginning of each year based on budgeted selling expenses expected to be
incurred by the Vishay Intertechnology sales organization. Commission expense
charged to the Business by the Vishay Intertechnology worldwide sales
organization was $234,000 and $154,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3,
2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
The net cash
generated by these transactions is retained by the Vishay Intertechnology
selling entity, and is presented in the combined and consolidated balance sheet
as a reduction in parent net investment, and is presented in the combined and
consolidated statements of cash flows as a financing activity in the caption
“Transactions with Vishay Intertechnology.”
These sales
activities will be transitioned to the Business’s dedicated sales forces shortly
after the spin-off.
Shared Facilities
The Business and
operations of Vishay Intertechnology outside the defined scope of the Business
share certain manufacturing and administrative sites. Costs are allocated based
on relative usage of the respective facilities.
Following the
spin-off, the Business and Vishay Intertechnology will continue to share certain
manufacturing locations. The Business will own one location in Israel and one
location in Japan, and will lease space to Vishay Intertechnology. Vishay
Intertechnology will own one location in Israel and one location in the United
States and lease space to the Business.
F-57
Note 2 – Related Party Transactions
(continued)
Administrative Service Sharing Agreements
The combined and
consolidated financial statements include transactions with other Vishay
Intertechnology operations involving administrative services (including expenses
primarily related to personnel, insurance, logistics, other overhead functions,
corporate IT support, and network communications support) that were provided to
the Business by Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope of
the Business. Amounts charged to the Business for these services were $403,000
and $633,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009,
respectively.
The Business will be
required to assume the responsibility for these functions, either internally or
from third-party vendors, following the spin-off. Under the terms of a
transition services agreement that the Business expects to enter into with
Vishay Intertechnology prior to the consummation of the spin-off, Vishay
Intertechnology will provide to the Business, for a fee, specified support
services for a period of 18 months after the spin-off.
Allocated Corporate Overhead Costs
The costs of certain
services that are provided by the Vishay Intertechnology corporate office to the
Business have been reflected in the combined and consolidated financial
statements, including charges for services such as accounting matters for all
SEC filings, investor relations, tax services, cash management, legal services,
and risk management on a global basis. These allocated costs are included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined and
consolidated statements of operations, and are presented in the combined and
consolidated balance sheet as a reduction in parent net investment.
The total amount of
allocated costs was $560,000 and $491,000 during the fiscal quarters ended April
3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively. These costs were allocated on the
ratio of Business revenues to total revenues and represent management’s
reasonable allocation of the costs incurred. However, these amounts are not
representative of the costs necessary for the Business to operate as an
independent, publicly traded company.
F-58
Note 2 – Related Party Transactions
(continued)
Centralized Cash Management
Vishay
Intertechnology uses a centralized approach to cash management in the United
States and Europe.
In the United States,
cash deposits from the Business historically were transferred to Vishay
Intertechnology on a regular basis and were netted against intercompany
payables, or occasionally remitted to the parent as a dividend. See “Net Payable
to Affiliates” below.
The Business’s
subsidiaries in Europe historically participated in a formal cash pooling
agreement, with Vishay Europe GmbH, an affiliate company, acting as the cash
pool leader, effectively serving as a bank for these subsidiaries. Each day, the
individual participant entity can either deposit funds into the cash pool
account from the collection of receivables or withdraw funds from the account to
fund working capital or other cash needs of the participant entity. At the end
of the day, the cash pool leader sweeps all cash balances into the cash pool
leader’s account, or funds any overdrawn accounts so that each cash pool
participant account has a zero balance at the end of the day. The individual
entity has discretion over the use of its cash, and accordingly, the combined
and consolidated financial statements classify the cash pool balances as “cash
and cash equivalents.” The Business’s subsidiaries have withdrawn from the
European cash pool as of December 31, 2009.
Vishay Europe GmbH,
as cash pool leader, pays interest on these funds based on the prevailing
interest rates at third-party lending institutions in Europe. The combined and
consolidated financial statements reflect cash pool interest income of $90,000
for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009.
Net Payable to Affiliates
The net amount
payable to Vishay Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined
scope of the Business primarily reflects balances carried forward from funding
provided by Vishay Intertechnology to make certain acquisitions, to retire
certain debt assumed in acquisitions, or as part of Vishay Intertechnology’s
global working capital allocation strategy.
As further described
above, throughout the period covered by the combined and consolidated financial
statements, the Business had significant agreements, transactions, and
relationships with Vishay Intertechnology operations outside the defined scope
of the Business. The net payable to affiliates also includes the effects of
these transactions.
Effective as of the
spin-off, the Business will utilize a portion of the cash on hand that was
generated by the Business to repay this intercompany debt with Vishay
Intertechnology and affiliated companies outside the defined scope of the
Business. Accordingly, at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the net payable
to affiliates is presented as a current liability.
The combined and
consolidated financial statements include charges for interest based on the
prevailing interest rate of Vishay Intertechnology’s revolving credit facility,
or if greater, an interest rate required by local tax authorities. Interest
expense on the net amount payable to affiliates was $183,000 and $355,000 during
the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively. Of
these amounts, $100,000 and $300,000 were not historically charged by Vishay
Intertechnology to the Business, and accordingly, these amounts of imputed
interest are reflected as an increase to parent net investment on the combined
and consolidated balance sheet. The remaining interest expense was charged to
the Business and paid in accordance with local statutory requirements.
F-59
Note 2 – Related Party Transactions
(continued)
Exchangeable Notes of Vishay Intertechnology
On December 13, 2002,
Vishay Intertechnology issued $105,000,000 in nominal (or principal) amount of
its floating rate unsecured exchangeable notes due 2102 in connection with an
acquisition. The notes are governed by a note instrument, made by Vishay
Intertechnology on December 13, 2002, and a put and call agreement, dated as of
December 13, 2002. The notes may be put to Vishay Intertechnology in exchange
for shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances, may be called
by Vishay Intertechnology for similar consideration.
Under the terms of
the put and call agreement, by reason of the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology is
required to take action so that the existing notes are deemed exchanged as of
the date of the spin-off, for a combination of new notes of Vishay
Intertechnology and notes issued by Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Except for Vishay
Intertechnology’s contractual obligation to issue new notes of any spin-off
company, these notes have no direct historical connection to the Business.
Accordingly, these exchangeable notes are not included in the historical
combined and consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, the exact amount of
the liability to be assumed by Vishay Precision Group, Inc. under the
exchangeable notes will not be known until ten trading days after the spin-off.
F-60
Note 3 – Restructuring and Severance
Costs
Restructuring and
severance costs reflect the cost reduction programs implemented by the Business.
These include the closing of facilities and the termination of employees.
Restructuring and severance costs include one-time exit costs, severance
benefits pursuant to an on-going benefit arrangement recognized and related
pension curtailment and settlement charges recognized
.
Restructuring
costs are expensed during the period in which the Business determines it will
incur those costs and all requirements of accrual are met. Because these costs
are recorded based upon estimates, actual expenditures for the restructuring
activities may differ from the initially recorded costs. If the initial
estimates are too low or too high, the Business could be required either to
record additional expenses in future periods or to reverse part of the
previously recorded charges. Asset write-downs are principally related to
buildings and equipment that will not be used subsequent to the completion of
restructuring plans presently being implemented, and cannot be sold for amounts
in excess of carrying value.
Restructuring Programs in Response to Global Economic Recession
In response to the
economic downturn during the latter half of 2008 and 2009, the Business
undertook significant measures to cut costs. This included a strict adaptation
of manufacturing capacity to sellable volume and limiting the building of
product for inventory. The Business incurred employee termination costs covering
technical, production, administrative, and support employees located in nearly
every country in which the Business operates.
The Business recorded
restructuring and severance costs of $479,000 for the fiscal quarter ended March
28, 2009.
No new restructuring
activities were initiated during the first quarter of 2010.
F-61
Note 4 – Income
Taxes
Income taxes for the
Business as presented in these combined and consolidated financial statements
are calculated on a separate tax return basis, although the Business’s
operations have historically been included in Vishay Intertechnology’s U.S.
federal and certain state tax returns, and United Kingdom “group relief,”
available to entities under common control, has been claimed. Vishay
Intertechnology’s global tax model has been developed based on its entire
portfolio of businesses. Accordingly, tax results as presented for the Business
in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of future
performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would
have generated as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods
presented.
Certain dedicated
entities have taxes payable to the local taxing authorities, but the Business
does not maintain taxes payable to/from parent in those jurisdictions where the
taxable incomes are combined or offset. Accordingly, the Business is deemed to
settle the annual current tax balances immediately with the legal tax-paying
entities in the respective jurisdictions. These settlements are reflected as
changes in parent net investment on the combined and consolidated balance
sheets.
The provision for
income taxes consists of provisions for federal, state, and foreign income
taxes. The effective tax rates for the periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28,
2009 reflect the Business’s expected tax rate on reported income before income
tax and tax adjustments. The Business operates in an international environment
with significant operations in various locations outside the United States.
Accordingly, the consolidated income tax rate is a composite rate reflecting the
Business’s earnings and the applicable tax rates in the various locations where
the Business operates.
The Business and its
subsidiaries are, or will be, subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous
foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax
positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary
course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the
ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Business establishes reserves for
tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to
which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves are established when the
Business believes that certain positions might be challenged despite its belief
that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Business adjusts these
reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances and the provision for
income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves
that are considered appropriate. At April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there
are no reserves because the Business has been fully indemnified by Vishay
Intertechnology.
F-62
Note 5 – Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
Comprehensive income
(loss) includes the following components
(in thousands)
:
|
Fiscal quarter ended
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
March 28, 2009
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
1,803
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment
|
|
(3,119
|
)
|
|
|
(2,560
|
)
|
Pension and other
postretirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
(3,063
|
)
|
|
|
(2,551
|
)
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(1,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,955
|
)
|
Less: Comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Vishay
stockholders
|
$
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,962
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss) includes the Business’s proportionate share of other comprehensive
income (loss) of nonconsolidated subsidiaries accounted for under the equity
method.
F-63
Note 6 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits
Defined Benefit Plans
Employees of the
Business participate in various defined benefit pension and other postretirement
benefit plans.
Certain subsidiaries
that comprise the Business offer defined benefit pension plans to their
employees, which are reflected in the accompanying combined and consolidated
financial statements.
Certain employees of
the Business in the United States and the United Kingdom have historically
participated in defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans sponsored
by Vishay Intertechnology. The annual cost of the Vishay Intertechnology defined
benefit plans is allocated to all of the participating businesses based upon a
specific actuarial computation, and accordingly, are reflected in the
accompanying combined and consolidated statements of operations.
The Business will
assume most of the obligations for employees in the United States and the United
Kingdom that will be employed by the Business after the spin-off, and
accordingly, those obligations are included in the Business’s combined and
consolidated balance sheets. An allocation of plan assets is also reflected in
the disclosures below.
Vishay
Intertechnology’s principal qualified U.S. pension plan, the Vishay
Intertechnology Retirement Plan (“VRP”), was frozen effective January 1, 2009.
Due to the freeze of the VRP, participants no longer accrue benefits. Given the
frozen nature of the VRP, participants who will become employees of the Business
after the spin-off will become terminated, vested participants of the VRP as of
the spin-off date and Vishay Intertechnology will retain the pension
obligations, the amount of which is not material.
Employees who
participated in the Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan will be
transferred into the newly created Vishay Precision Group Nonqualified
Retirement Plan. The Vishay Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was a
contributory pension plan designed to provide similar defined benefits to
covered U.S. employees whose benefits under the Vishay Intertechnology
Retirement Plan would be limited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code.
The Vishay
Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective January 1,
2009, and participants no longer accrue benefits.
The Vishay
Intertechnology Nonqualified Retirement Plan, like all nonqualified plans, is
considered to be unfunded. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified
trust, referred to as a “rabbi” trust, to fund benefits under this plan. Rabbi
trust assets are subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not
the property of employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent
assets. Vishay Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly
created rabbi trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance
sheets include allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $1,238,000 and
$1,220,000 at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which equals
the pension liability at those dates.
F-64
Note 6 – Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits (continued)
The following table
shows the components of net periodic cost of pension and other postretirement
benefit plans
(in thousands):
|
Fiscal quarter ended
|
|
Fiscal quarter ended
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
March 28, 2009
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Pension
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
Net service cost
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
Interest cost
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
33
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
Amortization of actuarial losses
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
Other Retirement Obligations
Certain key employees
participate in a deferred compensation plan sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology.
These employees will be transferred to a newly created deferred compensation
plan of the Business. The accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheets
include a liability within other noncurrent liabilities related to these
deferrals. Vishay Intertechnology maintains a nonqualified trust, referred to as
a “rabbi” trust, to fund payments under this plan. Rabbi trust assets are
subject to creditor claims under certain conditions and are not the property of
employees. Therefore, they are accounted for as other noncurrent assets. Vishay
Intertechnology will deposit an allocation of assets into a newly created rabbi
trust for the Business. The combined and consolidated balance sheets include
allocations of these rabbi trust assets of $2,365,000 and $2,295,000 at April 3,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Assets held in trust are intended to
approximate the Business’s liability under this plan.
F-65
Note 7 – Share-Based
Compensation
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains various stockholder-approved programs which allow for
the grant of share-based compensation to officers, directors, and employees,
including employees of the Business. The following disclosures represent the
portion of the Vishay Intertechnology programs in which employees of the
Business participated.
Vishay
Intertechnology common stock underlies all awards granted under these programs.
Accordingly, the amounts presented are not necessarily indicative of future
performance and do not necessarily reflect the results that the Business would
have experienced as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods
presented.
Outstanding Vishay
Intertechnology equity awards held by employees of the Business generally will
expire at or within 60 days of the spin-off. The Business expects to issue
replacement awards based on its own common stock after the spin-off.
The amount of
compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions is measured based
on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued. The fair value of
each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The Business determines compensation cost for restricted
stock units (“RSUs”) and phantom stock units based on the grant-date fair value
of the underlying common stock. Compensation cost is recognized over the period
that the participant provides service in exchange for the award.
The following table
summarizes share-based compensation expense recognized
(in thousands):
|
Fiscal quarter ended
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
March 28, 2009
|
Vishay stock options
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
15
|
Vishay restricted stock units
|
|
4
|
|
|
-
|
Vishay phantom stock units
|
|
44
|
|
|
19
|
Total
|
$
|
58
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
The following table
summarizes Vishay Intertechnology stock option activity of the Business’s
employees
(number of options in
thousands)
:
|
Number
|
|
Weighted
|
|
of
|
|
Average
|
|
Vishay
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
102
|
|
$
|
20.24
|
Granted
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Cancelled
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
End of period
|
102
|
|
$
|
20.24
|
|
Vested and
|
|
|
|
|
expected to vest
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
Note 7 – Share-Based Compensation
(continued)
The pretax aggregate
intrinsic value (the difference between the closing stock price of Vishay
Intertechnology common stock on the last trading day of first fiscal quarter of
2010 of $10.03 per share and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had
all option holders exercised their options on April 3, 2010 is approximately
$6,000. This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Vishay
Intertechnology’s common stock. No options were exercised during the three
fiscal months ended April 3, 2010.
Restricted Stock Units and Phantom Stock Units
At both April 3, 2010
and December 31, 2009, employees of the Business hold
6,668 unvested
Vishay Intertechnology RSUs.
Vishay
Intertechnology phantom stock units granted to employees of the Business totaled
5,000 during the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010. At April 3, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, employees of the Business hold 35,000 and 30,000 phantom
stock units, respectively, which will be converted into Vishay Intertechnology
common stock upon completion of the spin-off.
F-67
Note 8 – Segment
Information
The Business operates
in two product segments: Foil Technology Products, which include foil resistors
and strain gages, and Weighing Modules and Control Systems, which include load
cells, instruments, and complete systems for process control or on-board
weighing applications.
The Business
evaluates operating segment performance on operating income, exclusive of
certain items. Management believes that evaluating segment performance excluding
items such as restructuring and severance costs, and other items is meaningful
because it provides insight with respect to intrinsic operating results of the
Business.
The following table
sets forth operating segment information
(in thousands)
:
|
Fiscal quarter ended
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
March 28, 2009
|
Net third-party
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighing Modules & Control Systems
|
$
|
24,278
|
|
|
$
|
24,437
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
23,897
|
|
|
|
19,268
|
|
Total
|
$
|
48,175
|
|
|
$
|
43,705
|
|
|
Gross margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighing Modules & Control Systems
|
$
|
5,116
|
|
|
$
|
6,073
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
11,932
|
|
|
|
7,978
|
|
Total
|
$
|
17,048
|
|
|
$
|
14,051
|
|
|
Segment operating
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighing Modules & Control Systems
|
$
|
(158
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,491
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
8,236
|
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
Unallocated SG&A expenses
|
|
(4,237
|
)
|
|
|
(3,287
|
)
|
Restructuring and severance
costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
Consolidated operating income (loss)
|
$
|
3,841
|
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
Restructuring and severance
costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighing Modules & Control Systems
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
Foil Technology Products
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
479
|
|
|
Products are
transferred between segments on a basis intended to reflect, as nearly as
practicable, the market value of the products. Intersegment sales from the Foil
Technology Products segment to the Weighing Modules and Control Systems segment
were $394,000 and $345,000 for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2010 and March
28, 2009, respectively.
F-68
Note 9 – Additional Financial Statement
Information
The caption “Other”
on the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
Fiscal quarter ended
|
|
April 3,
|
|
March 28,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Interest income
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Other
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
Net inventories consist of the following
(in thousands
)
:
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
12,581
|
|
|
$
|
13,341
|
|
Work in process
|
|
13,332
|
|
|
|
13,214
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
19,097
|
|
|
|
17,247
|
|
|
$
|
45,010
|
|
|
$
|
43,802
|
|
|
Net property and equipment consists of
the following
(in thousands
)
:
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Land
|
$
|
1,941
|
|
|
$
|
2,003
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
38,091
|
|
|
|
38,486
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
64,733
|
|
|
|
64,681
|
|
Software
|
|
3,652
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
Projects in process
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(65,574
|
)
|
|
|
(64,516
|
)
|
|
$
|
44,236
|
|
|
$
|
44,599
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses consist of the
following
(in thousands
)
:
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Restructuring
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
Goods received, not yet invoiced
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
Other
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
$
|
6,119
|
|
|
$
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
Note 10 – Fair Value
Measurements
ASC Topic 820
establishes a valuation hierarchy of the inputs used to measure fair value. This
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair
value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those
three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the Business’s own
assumptions.
An asset or
liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The following table
provides the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on
a recurring basis
(in thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements at reporting
date using:
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
April 3,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in rabbi trusts
|
$
|
3,603
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in rabbi trusts
|
$
|
3,515
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
$
|
-
|
Vishay
Intertechnology maintains nonqualified trusts, referred to as “rabbi” trusts, to
fund payments under deferred compensation and nonqualified pension plans, and
the Business will establish similar trusts to continue these programs. Vishay
Intertechnology will contribute assets to the Business’s rabbi trust prior to
the spin-off in an amount that approximates the Business’s liability under these
arrangements. The assets above are based on a pro rata allocation of the Vishay
Intertechnology rabbi trust assets, but the actual assets transferred may
differ. Rabbi trust assets consist primarily of marketable securities,
classified as available-for-sale and company-owned life insurance assets. The
marketable securities held in the rabbi trusts are valued using quoted market
prices on the last business day of the year. The company-owned life insurance
assets are valued in consultation with Vishay Intertechnology’s insurance
brokers using the value of underlying assets of the insurance contracts. The
fair value measurement of the marketable securities held in the rabbi trust is
considered a Level 1 measurement and the measurement of the company-owned life
insurance assets is considered a Level 2 measurement within the fair value
hierarchy.
The Business’s
financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
long-term notes receivable, short-term notes payable, accounts payable, and
long-term debt. The carrying amounts for these financial instruments reported in
the combined and consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair values.
F-70