UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section
14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ | Filed by the Registrant | ☐ | Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: | ||
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☑ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
CVS Health Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its
Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX): | |||
☑ | No fee required. | ||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. | ||
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
5) Total fee paid: | |||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: | ||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. | ||
1) Amount previously paid: | |||
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
3) Filing Party: | |||
4) Date Filed: |
Notice
of
Annual
Meeting
of Stockholders |
|
May 10, 2017; 9:00 a.m. |
|
CVS Health Corporation
|
|
|
MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN AND
OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
2016 was another successful year for CVS Health as we continued to benefit from our focus on delivering affordable, accessible and effective health care. Our unmatched suite of leading integrated assets continues to create superior value for patients, payors and providers.
While we delivered significant growth in Adjusted Earnings Per Share, this past year was also impacted by some headwinds that weighed on our stocks performance. Thanks in part to the rhetoric surrounding last years presidential election, our stock, as well as that of others in our space, was affected by the public discussion regarding the rising costs of prescription drugs, and the possible repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act. Additionally, the loss of retail pharmacy prescriptions associated with a few pharmacy network changes announced in late 2016 is expected to challenge our retail pharmacy business and make this year a rebuilding year.
However, we have implemented plans that are expected to return us to more robust levels of earnings growth in the years ahead. We remain well-positioned to be successful and achieve long-term growth because of our ability to pivot as health care changes and deliver needed solutions that will enhance patient access, improve health outcomes and lower overall health care costs. When you consider the breadth of our assets, all of which are focused on making health care more accessible, affordable and effective, our competitive advantage is clear.
We continue to remain focused on our three pillars that maximize stockholder value. First, we drive productive, long-term growth as evidenced by our solid increases in revenues, operating profit and earnings per share. Second, we generate substantial levels of free cash flow, providing a solid platform to drive future growth. Third, we maintain a disciplined approach to optimizing capital allocation, investing our free cash opportunistically in value-enhancing projects while returning more than $6 billion to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases this past year alone. In addition, we have embarked on an enterprise streamlining initiative that will enable us to create significant savings that can be used to further maximize stockholder value.
CVS Health works every day to provide people with high quality pharmacy and basic health care services, and to make these services accessible and affordable. We align our purpose of helping people on their path to better health with our corporate social responsibility roadmap, Prescription for a Better World. We have taken the roadmap a step further by making our business operations, workplace, supply chain and communities more sustainable. Some of the highlights of our progress can be found inside the back cover of this proxy statement.
This past year we continued to engage proactively with our stockholders to ensure that we understand your needs. We pride ourselves on strong corporate governance practices and we believe that accountability to our stockholders is a mark of good governance. Within this proxy statement, you will find the details of the changes we have made as a result of conversations with many of you. We certainly welcome your feedback on the changes we have made.
Our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Wednesday, May 10, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., at the CVS Health Customer Support Center located at One CVS Drive in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. We invite you to attend, and ask you to please vote at your earliest convenience, whether or not you plan to attend. Your vote is important.
We remain confident that our leadership across the pharmacy spectrum will allow us to continue to drive superior value for our health care partners and our shareholders. Thank you for investing in CVS Health.
|
|
|
David W. Dorman |
Larry J. Merlo | |
Chairman of the Board |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
01 |
01 | MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN AND OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | |
03 | NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS | |
04 | PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS | |
10 | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS | |
30 | AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS | |
57 | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES |
67 | 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN | |
67 | Item 5: Proposal to Approve the Companys 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan | |
80 | OTHER INFORMATION | |
80 | Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting | |
82 | Stockholder Proposals and Other Business for Our Annual Meeting in 2018 | |
82 | Other Matters | |
A-1 | EXHIBIT A - 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
02 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Date and Time
May 10, 2017, 9:00 A.M.
Place
CVS Health Corporation
Customer Support Center
One CVS Drive
Woonsocket,
Rhode Island 02895
● |
Elect 12 directors named in this
proxy statement;
|
● |
Ratify the appointment of Ernst
& Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal 2017;
|
● |
Act, by non-binding vote, to approve
the Companys executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy
statement;
|
● |
Recommend, by non-binding vote, the
frequency of future advisory votes on the Companys executive
compensation;
|
● |
Adopt the Companys 2017 Incentive
Compensation Plan;
|
● |
Act on three stockholder proposals,
if properly presented; and
|
● |
Conduct any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting. |
Eligibility to Vote
Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14,
2017 may vote at the Annual Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Colleen M. McIntosh
Senior Vice President & Corporate Secretary
How to Vote
|
|||||
|
Use
the Internet
www.proxyvote.com |
||||
|
Use a Mobile
Device
Scan this QR Code |
||||
|
Call
Toll-Free
1-800-690-6903 |
||||
|
Mail
Your Proxy Card
Follow the instructions on your voting form |
||||
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on May 10, 2017: The proxy statement and annual report to security holders are available at www.cvshealthannualmeeting.com and at www.proxyvote.com/cvs. |
|||||
Your vote is important.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares. In addition to voting in person or by mail, stockholders of record have the option of voting by telephone or via the Internet. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record (i.e., in street name), please read your voting instructions to see which of these options are available to you. Even if you are attending the Annual Meeting in person, we encourage you to vote in advance by mail, phone or Internet.
We began mailing this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card on or about March 31, 2017 to all stockholders entitled to vote. Our 2016 Annual Report, which includes our financial statements, is being sent with this proxy statement.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
03 |
This summary highlights selected information in this Proxy Statement please review the entire document before voting.
All of our Annual Meeting materials are available in one place at www.cvshealthannualmeeting.com. There, you can download electronic copies of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, and use the link to vote. |
ITEM 1 |
●
Our nominees are seasoned leaders who bring a mix of
skills and qualifications to the Board
See pages
10-19 for further information
|
|||
Election of 12 directors named in this proxy statement |
||||
|
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote each director nominee |
|||
The CVS Health Board
You are asked to vote on the election of the following 12 nominees to serve on the Board of Directors of CVS Health. All directors are elected by a majority of votes cast.
CVS HEALTH COMMITTEES | |||||||||||
NAME, PRIMARY OCCUPATION | AGE |
DIRECTOR
SINCE |
INDEPENDENT |
OTHER
PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS |
A | MP&D | N&CG | PS&CQ | E | ||
Richard M.
Bracken
Retired Chairman and CEO of HCA Holdings, Inc. |
64 | 2015 | YES | None | ● | ● | |||||
C. David Brown
II
Chairman of Broad and Cassel |
65 | 2007 | YES | 2 | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Alecia A.
DeCoudreaux
Retired President of Mills College |
62 | 2015 | YES | None | ● | ● | |||||
Nancy-Ann M.
DeParle
Co-Founding Partner of Consonance Capital Partners, LLC |
60 | 2013 | YES | 1 | ● | ● | |||||
David W.
Dorman
Chairman of the Board of CVS Health Corporation, Founding Partner of Centerview Capital Technology Fund |
63 | 2006 | YES | 2 | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Anne M. Finucane
Vice Chairman of Bank of America Corporation |
64 | 2011 | YES | None | ● | ● | |||||
Larry J.
Merlo
President and CEO of CVS Health Corporation |
61 | 2010 | NO | None | ● | ||||||
Jean-Pierre
Millon
Retired President and CEO of PCS Health Systems, Inc. |
66 | 2007 | YES | None | ● | ● | |||||
|
Mary L. Schapiro
Vice Chair, Advisory Board Promontory Financial Group |
61 | ---- | YES | 2 | ||||||
Richard J.
Swift
Retired Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of Foster Wheeler Ltd. |
72 | 2006 | YES | 4 | ● | ● | |||||
William C.
Weldon
Retired Chairman of the Board and CEO of Johnson & Johnson |
68 | 2013 | YES | 2 | ● | ● | |||||
Tony L. White
|
70 | 2011 | YES | 2 | ● | ● |
● : Committee Chair | MP&D : Management Planning & Development | PS&CQ : Patient Safety & Clinical Quality |
A : Audit | N&CG : Nominating & Corporate Governance | E : Executive |
04 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS |
THE CVS HEALTH BOARD
2016 Board of Directors
For more information about our directors and our new nominee, please refer to pages 10-16 of this proxy statement. |
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
The CVS Health Board continues to evaluate the Companys corporate governance policies and practices to ensure that the right mix of individuals are present in our boardroom, to best serve the stockholders we represent by ensuring effective oversight of our strategy and management. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of corporate governance, and have established a strong and effective framework by which the Company is governed and reviewed.
FURTHER
|
||||
2016-2017 Board
|
●
Formation of a new Committee
focused on patient safety and clinical quality in March
2016
|
page 27 |
||
●
We adopted a proxy access by-law that allows holders of
at least 3% of our stock for a period of three years the right to nominate
candidates for up to 20% of board seats, with a minimum of two
seats
|
page 18 | |||
●
In March 2017 we nominated Mary Schapiro for election to
our Board of Directors; if elected, Ms. Schapiro will strengthen our Board
and increase its gender diversity
|
pages 16-17 |
|||
Board
|
●
Our Board supports our stockholder outreach program and
has responded to stockholder input with changes in our compensation
program and other areas
|
pages 6-7, 20, 32, 42 |
||
●
Right to act by written consent and to call special
meetings
|
page 20 | |||
●
Majority voting in director elections
|
page 18 | |||
●
Annual election of all directors, annual say-on-pay
vote
|
pages 10, 34-35 |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
05 |
PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS |
FURTHER
|
||||
Director
|
●
At least 75% of our directors
annual retainer mix is paid in shares of CVS Health common
stock
|
pages 32-33 |
||
●
Directors must own at least 10,000 shares of CVS Health
common stock
|
page 77 | |||
●
All directors except one had 100% meeting
attendance
|
page 28 |
|||
Board
Oversight
|
●
Full Board and individual Committee focus on
understanding Company risks
|
page 19 |
||
●
Annually, the Audit Committee reviews our policies and
practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including
discussing with management our major risks and the steps that have been
taken to monitor and mitigate such risks
|
page 23 | |||
●
The Management Planning and Development Committee is
responsible for reviewing and assessing potential risk arising from the
Companys compensation policies and practices
|
page 26 | |||
●
Our independent Chairman and our CEO are focused on the
Companys risk management efforts and ensure that risk matters are
appropriately brought to the Board and/or its Committees for
review
|
pages 19-20 |
STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION ACTIONS
During the fall of 2016, we reached out to our 50 largest stockholders, holders of more than 50% of our outstanding common stock in the aggregate, and offered to discuss corporate governance, our compensation programs and any other matters of interest. We had discussions with many stockholders and one of the leading proxy advisory firms. During those discussions, we heard several themes that caused us to take action:
What we heard |
What we have done
in response |
Intended outcome | When effective | |||
Proxy access is a right that is important to stockholders | Discussed our proxy access by-law, which was adopted early in 2016, with our stockholders | Provide stockholders the right to nominate candidates for election to our Board and have their nominees included in our proxy statement | 2016 | |||
Diversity of the Board may be improved by ensuring that diverse candidates are included in director searches | Amended our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter to specifically include a requirement for diverse candidates | Memorialize and formalize our existing practice of including diverse candidates in all director searches | 2017 | |||
Annual stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation (say-on-pay) allow us to evaluate the Companys compensation practices | Recommended annual as the frequency for future stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation | Maintain a regular dialogue and receive annual feedback from our stockholders on our executive compensation practices | This proxy statement | |||
Your ability to use discretion in determining bonus payments is unclear and allows substantial increases |
Reduced cap on our Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) to be aligned with the broad-based Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and better articulated guidelines that the Committee uses for discretionary adjustments |
Improved transparency; program design reflects the Management Planning and Development (MP&D) Committees intentions |
The MP&D Committee applied the new limits to the 2016 performance year EIP awards; improved disclosure in this proxy statement related to the Committees use of discretion |
06 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS |
What we heard |
What we have done
in response |
Intended outcome | When effective | |||
Describe how the incentive plan metrics support the Companys growth strategy | Improved disclosure | Improve stockholders understanding of why we use certain incentive plan metrics | This proxy statement | |||
Practice of paying dividend equivalents on unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) at the same time and rate as stockholders is inconsistent with time vesting requirements | Dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs will be paid only to the extent the underlying award vests | Align the dividend equivalent awards with the vesting provisions of RSUs; simplify accounting treatment of awards | Beginning with 2017 awards |
For more information on corporate governance at CVS Health, please refer to pages 17-29 of this proxy statement and to our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com/corporate-governance. |
ITEM 4 |
●
We believe that an
annual vote on our executive compensation program provides us with
valuable and actionable feedback from our stockholders
See page
33 for further information
|
|||
Recommend, by a non-binding vote, the frequency of future advisory votes Companys executive compensation |
||||
|
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote every (1) YEAR for this proposal |
|||
ITEM 5 |
●
Our ICP is an important tool to attract and
retain quality executives and employees
See pages 67-71 for
further information
|
|||
Approve the Companys 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) |
||||
|
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote this proposal |
|||
ITEMS 6-8 |
●
See the Boards
statement of opposition AGAINST each stockholder proposal
See pages 72-76 for further
information
|
|||
Stockholder proposals |
||||
|
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote all stockholder proposals |
|||
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
07 |
PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS |
PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS |
For CVS Health, 2016 was a successful year. Here are some highlights:
NET
REVENUES ($ billions)
1 year growth of 15.8% |
OPERATING PROFIT ($
billions)
1 year growth of 9.3% |
2014-2016 RETURN
ON
NET ASSETS (%) Exceeded target by 22% |
||
|
|
|
||
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN (TSR) (%) LTIP Modifier (Percentile of S&P 500) |
ANNUAL CASH DIVIDENDS
($ PER SHARE) 1 year increase of 21.4% |
DILUTED EARNINGS PER
SHARE
FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS ($) 1 year growth of 6.2% |
||
|
|
|
For more information on our financial performance, please refer to our Annual Report available at www.cvshealthannualmeeting.com. Please also see page 56 of this proxy statement for additional information about how we calculate Return on Net Assets, a metric used in our Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
08 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS |
COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS |
LEADING PRACTICES IN COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Our pay practices align with and support our core compensation principles. They also demonstrate our commitment to sound compensation and governance practices.
Our executive compensation program motivates executive officers to take personal responsibility for the performance of CVS Health |
✓
Core Executive Compensation Principles
Designed to Promote Company Growth
✓
Performance Measures
Aligned with Stockholder Interests
✓
Majority of the Total
Compensation Opportunity is Performance-Based
✓
Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) Awards Settled in Common Stock that is Subject to Retention
Requirement (Holding Period)
✓
Stock Ownership
Guidelines
|
We apply leading executive compensation practices |
✓
No Excise Tax
Gross-Ups
✓
No Option
Repricing
✓
No Recycling of
Shares
✓
Recoupment
Policy
✓
Broad Anti-Pledging and
Hedging Policies
✓
Executive Severance
Policy
✓
Limited Perquisites and
Personal Benefits
✓
SERP Closed to New
Participants
✓
Double Trigger Vesting of
Equity Awards
✓
Board Committee
Oversight of Comprehensive Annual Compensation Program Risk
Assessment
|
New this year |
✓
Dividend Equivalents on
RSUs Paid Only When Awards Vest
✓
Reduced Maximum Annual EIP
Award to Align with Broad-Based MIP
✓
Limited Positive Discretion on Annual
Incentive Awards
✓
Revised Total
Shareholder Return (TSR) Modifier for 2017-2019 LTIP to Adjust Above or
Below the 50
th
Percentile Relative
Ranking
|
OUR 2016 EXECUTIVE PAY
The following shows the breakdown of reported 2016 compensation for our CEO and our other named executive officers, or NEOs.
89% Performance Aligned | |||||
Base
|
Annual
Incentive Awards 10% |
RSUs and
Options
33% |
LTIP
46% |
Other
4% |
|
79% Long-Term |
All Other NEOs
85% Performance Aligned | |||||
Base
|
Annual
Incentive Awards 12% |
RSUs and Options
35% |
LTIP
38% |
Other
|
|
73% Long-Term |
For more information on our executive compensation practices, please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, beginning on page 35 of this proxy statement. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
09 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
Our Board of Directors has nominated 12 candidates for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. Eleven nominees currently serve as directors and one nominee would be a new member of our Board. If elected, each nominee will hold office until the next annual meeting.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the Board, with Ms. Schapiro as a new nominee, is well-balanced and that it fully and effectively addresses the Companys needs. All of our nominees are seasoned leaders, the majority of whom are or were chief executive officers or other senior executives, who bring to the Board skills and qualifications gained during their tenure at a vast array of public companies, private companies, non-profits, governmental and regulatory agencies and other organizations. We have indicated below for each nominee certain of the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Committee and the Board to conclude that the nominee should continue to serve as a director.
BIOGRAPHIES OF OUR INCUMBENT BOARD NOMINEES
Independent Director
CVS Health
Board
|
Richard M.
Bracken
|
Director Qualification
Highlights
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Business Operations; Consumer Products or Services
●
Finance
●
Health Care/Regulated Industry
●
Risk Management
●
Corporate Governance
|
||
Education B.A., San Diego State University; M.H.A., Medical College of Virginia
Biography
Skills and Qualifications of
Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
||||
10 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
|
C. David Brown
II
Independent
Director
|
|
Alecia A.
DeCoudreaux
Independent
Director
|
|||||||
Age
65
|
Age
62
|
|||||||||
Director Qualification Highlights |
Director Qualification Highlights |
|||||||||
●
Real Estate
●
Business Development and Corporate
Transactions
●
Finance
●
Legal and Regulatory Compliance
●
Risk Management
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.S.B.A., University of Florida; J.D., University of Florida College of Law
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
●
Business Development and Corporate
Transactions
●
Legal and Regulatory Compliance
●
Health Care/Regulated Industry
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Policy and Government Affairs
Education B.A., Wellesley College; J.D., Indiana University School of Law
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
11 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
|
Nancy-Ann M.
DeParle
Independent
Director
|
|
David W.
Dorman
Independent
Director
|
|||||||
Age
60
|
Age
63
|
|||||||||
Director Qualification Highlights |
Director Qualification Highlights |
|||||||||
●
Business Development and Corporate
Transactions
●
Finance
●
Legal and Regulatory Compliance
●
Health Care Industry
●
Public Policy and Government Affairs
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.A., University of Tennessee; B.A. and M.A., Balliol College, Oxford University; J.D., Harvard Law School
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Finance
●
International Business Operations; Consumer Products or
Services
●
Technology and Innovation
●
Risk Management
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.S., Georgia Tech University
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
12 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
|
Anne M.
Finucane
Independent
Director
|
|
Larry J.
Merlo
Independent
Director
|
|||||||
Age
64
|
Age
61
|
|||||||||
Director Qualification Highlights |
Director Qualification Highlights |
|||||||||
●
Consumer Products or Services
●
Corporate Strategy Development and
Oversight
●
Marketing, Brand Management
●
Public Policy
●
Public Relations
●
Regulated Industry
Education B.A., University of New Hampshire
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
●
Leadership Current CEO
●
Business Operations; Consumer Products or
Services
●
Health Care/Regulated Industry
●
Public Policy
●
Retail, Retail Pharmacy and Pharmacy Benefit
Management
Education B.S., Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
13 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
|
Jean-Pierre
Millon
Independent
Director
|
|
Richard J.
Swift
Independent
Director
|
|||||||
Age
66
|
Age
72
|
|||||||||
Director Qualification Highlights |
Director Qualification Highlights |
|||||||||
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Finance
●
Corporate Strategy Development and
Oversight
●
Health Care/Regulated Industry
●
International Business Operations
●
Pharmacy Benefit Management
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.S., Ecole Centrale de Lyon (France); B.A., Université de Lyon (France); M.B.A., Kellogg School of Business, Northwestern University
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Finance
●
International Business Operations
●
Risk Management
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.S., U.S. Military Academy at West Point; M.S., Purdue University; M.B.A., Fairleigh Dickinson University
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
14 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
|
William C.
Weldon
Independent
Director
|
|
Tony L.
White
Independent
Director
|
|||||||
Age
68
|
Age
70
|
|||||||||
Director Qualification Highlights |
Director Qualification Highlights |
|||||||||
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Finance
●
Health Care/Regulated Industry
●
International Business Operations; Consumer Products or
Services
●
Risk Management
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.S., Quinnipiac University
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Finance
●
Health Care/Regulated Industry
●
Technology and Innovation
●
Risk Management
●
Corporate Governance
●
Public Company Board Service
Education B.A., Western Carolina University
Biography
Skills and
Qualifications of Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
15 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
Independent Nominee
CVS Health
Board
|
Mary L.
Schapiro
|
Director Qualification
Highlights
●
Leadership Former CEO
●
Public Policy and Government Affairs
●
Finance
●
Risk Management
●
Legal and Regulatory Compliance
●
Public Company Board Service
|
||
Education B.A., Franklin and Marshall College; J.D., George Washington University
Biography
Skills and Qualifications of
Particular Relevance to CVS Health
|
||||
16 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
SELECTING OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Director Nominee Independence | Director Nominee Gender | Director Nominee Tenure | ||
|
|
|
||
11 nominees for Director, including our Chairman , are independent of management. Mr. Merlo, our President and CEO, is our only non-independent nominee. |
Three of the last four additions to our Board, including our new nominee , are women. |
Our nominees bring a balance of experience and fresh perspective to our boardroom. The average tenure of current CVS Health directors is seven years. |
In addition to our current Directors, we have nominated Mary L. Schapiro for election to our Board. Ms. Schapiro has been determined to be independent , and her election would reduce average tenure to six years . |
Director Skills and Experience
Our directors and our new nominee possess relevant experience, skills and qualifications that contribute to a well-functioning Board to effectively oversee the Companys strategy and management. Areas of director expertise include:
Director Qualification Criteria; Diversity
Recognizing that the selection of qualified directors is complex and crucial to the long-term success of the Company, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has established in its charter guidelines for the identification and evaluation of candidates for membership on the Board. Under its charter, the Committee recommends to the Board criteria for Board membership and recommends individuals for membership on our Board. The criteria used by the Committee in nominating directors are found in the Committees charter and provide that candidates should be distinguished individuals who are prominent in their fields or otherwise possess exemplary qualities that will enable them to effectively function as directors. While the Committee does not believe it appropriate to establish any specific minimum qualifications for candidates, it focuses on the following qualities in identifying and evaluating candidates for Board membership:
● |
Background, experience and
skills
|
● |
Character, reputation and personal
integrity
|
● |
Judgment
|
● |
Independence
|
● |
Diversity
|
● |
Commitment to the Company and
service on the Board
|
● |
Any other factors that the Committee may determine to be relevant and appropriate |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
17 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 1 |
The Committee makes these determinations in the context of the existing composition of the Board so as to achieve an appropriate mix of characteristics. Consistent with this philosophy, the Committee is committed to including in each search qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race. The Committee also takes into account all applicable legal, regulatory and stock exchange requirements concerning the composition of the Board and its committees. The Committee reviews these guidelines from time to time as appropriate (and in any event at least annually) and modifies them as it deems appropriate.
The Committee also reviews the composition of the Board in light of the current challenges and needs of the Board and the Company, and determines whether it may be appropriate to add or remove individuals after considering, among other things, the need for audit committee expertise and issues of independence, diversity, judgment, character, reputation, age, skills, background and experience.
The Committee values diversity, which it broadly views in terms of, among other things, gender, race, background and experience, as a factor in selecting members to serve on the Board. Our nominees reflect that diversity, including in terms of race, gender and ethnic background. In addition, to ensure that it has access to a broad range of qualified, experienced and diverse candidates, the Committee may use the services of an independent search firm to help identify and assist in the evaluation of candidates.
Board Evaluation Process
When considering current directors for re-nomination to the Board, the Committee takes into account the performance of each director, which is part of the Committees annual Board evaluation process. That process consists of individual interviews of each director by our General Counsel, followed by a report summarizing his findings. The Committee then recommends actions for the Board to consider and adopt as it sees fit.
Board Refreshment; Retirement Age
The Committee and the Board believe that setting a retirement age for CVS Health directors is advisable to facilitate the addition of new directors. Accordingly, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no director who is or would be over the age of 74 at the expiration of his or her current term may be nominated to a new term, unless the Board waives the retirement age for a specific director in exceptional circumstances. In the event any waiver is provided, the Board will disclose the rationale for its decision.
Majority Voting
As discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting (assuming that the election is uncontested). Under our by-laws, each nominee who is a current director is required to submit an irrevocable resignation, which resignation would become effective upon (1) that person not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, and (2) acceptance by the Board of that resignation in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the Board. The Board, acting on the recommendation of the Committee, will no later than at its first regularly scheduled meeting following certification of the stockholder vote, determine whether to accept the resignation of the unsuccessful incumbent. Absent a determination by the Board that a compelling reason exists for concluding that it is in the best interests of the Company for an unsuccessful incumbent to remain as a director, the Board will accept that persons resignation. In the event any resignation is not accepted, the Board will disclose the rationale for its determination.
Stockholder Submission of Nominees
The Committee will consider any director candidates proposed by stockholders who submit a written request to our Corporate Secretary (including via our proxy access by-law, described below). All candidates should meet the Director Qualification Criteria, discussed above. The Committee evaluates all director candidates and nominees in the same manner regardless of the source. If a stockholder would like to nominate a person for election or re-election to the Board, he or she must provide notice to the Company as provided in our by-laws and described in this proxy statement. The notice must include a written consent indicating that the candidate is willing to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected and any other information that the SEC would require to be included in a proxy statement when a stockholder submits a proposal. See Other Information Stockholder Proposals and Other Business for our Annual Meeting in 2018 for additional information related to proposals, including any nominations, for our 2018 Annual Meeting.
Proxy Access
In January 2016, following the receipt of a stockholder proposal and
extensive conversations with the proponent and several other stockholders, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended and the Board adopted
a proxy access by-law. Under the by-law a stockholder, or a group of up to 20
stockholders, owning at least three percent of the Companys outstanding common
stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in the
Companys proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of
two nominees or 20% of the Board, provided that the stockholders and the
nominees satisfy the requirements specified in the Companys by-laws.
18 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: THE BOARDS ROLE AND ACTIVITIES IN 2016 |
Independence Determinations for Directors
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a substantial majority of our Board must be comprised of directors who meet the director independence requirements set forth in the Corporate Governance Rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listed Company Manual. Under NYSE Rules, no director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company.
Our Board has adopted categorical standards to assist in making director independence determinations. Any relationship that falls within the following standards or relationships will not, in itself, preclude a determination of independence. These categorical standards are set forth in Annex A to the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com/corporate-governance/documents or upon request to our Corporate Secretary.
2016 Determinations
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board
undertook its annual review of director and nominee independence in March 2017.
The Committee recommended and the Board determined that each of Mmes.
DeCoudreaux, DeParle, Finucane and Schapiro, and each of Messrs. Bracken, Brown,
Dorman, Millon, Swift, Weldon and White, is independent. Mr. Merlo is not an
independent director because of his employment as President and CEO of the
Company.
THE BOARDS ROLE AND ACTIVITIES IN 2016 |
The Board acts as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company and advises and oversees management, which is responsible for the day-to-day operations and management of the Company. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board reviews and assesses CVS Healths long-term strategy and its strategic, competitive and financial performance.
In 2016 the Board oversaw the return of approximately $6 billion to our stockholders through a combination of cash dividends and stock repurchases. The Board increased the cash dividend significantly for both 2016 and 2017, taking the quarterly payment from $0.35 per share to $0.50 per share, an aggregate increase of over 40% from 2015. In November 2016, the Board approved a new $15 billion share buyback program, further showing its commitment to returning value to stockholders. The Board also approved the refinancing of much of the Companys long-term debt, resulting in significant ongoing savings in terms of interest rates and payments. In addition, given the Companys expanded offerings throughout the spectrum of health care, the Board formed a new Committee that is focused on the quality of pharmacy and medical care being delivered by the Company.
The Boards Role in Strategy and Succession Planning
The Board reviews the Companys financial performance on a regular basis at Board meetings and through periodic updates, with a particular focus on peer and competitive comparisons. The Board also periodically reviews the Companys long-term strategy, and assesses its strategic, competitive and financial performance, on both an absolute basis and in relation to the performance, practices and policies of its peers and competitors. While the Board receives updates regarding strategic matters throughout the year, one Board meeting per year, typically in September, is focused almost entirely on the Companys short- and long-term strategic direction. The Board receives reports from management and expert speakers are often engaged. At this meeting the Board provides input and oversight on short-term strategic goals and sets the long-term strategic direction of the Company.
The Board also reviews the Companys succession planning, including succession planning in the case of the incapacitation, retirement or removal of the CEO. In that regard, the CEO provides an annual report to the Board recommending and evaluating potential successors, along with a review of any development plans recommended for such individuals. The CEO also provides to the Board, on an ongoing basis, his recommendation as to a successor in the event of an unexpected emergency. The Board also reviews succession planning with respect to the Companys key executive officers, i.e., those who are members of the Business Planning Committee, or BPC.
The Boards Role in Risk Oversight
The Boards role in risk oversight involves both the full Board and its Committees, as well as members of management.
● |
The Audit Committee is charged with the primary role in carrying out risk oversight responsibilities on behalf of the Board. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee annually reviews our policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including discussing with management the Companys major risk exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and mitigate such exposures. The Audit Committee also reviews CVS Healths major financial risk exposures as well as major operational, compliance, reputational and strategic risks, including developing steps to monitor, manage and mitigate those risks. |
● |
Each of our other Board Committees is responsible for oversight of risk management practices for categories of risks relevant to their functions. For example, the Management Planning and Development Committee has oversight responsibility for our overall compensation structure, including review of its compensation practices, with a view to assessing associated risk. See Compensation Risk Assessment on page 26 for additional information. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
19 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: THE BOARDS ROLE AND ACTIVITIES IN 2016 |
● |
As part of CVS Healths ongoing
Enterprise Risk Management process, each of our major business units is
responsible for identifying risks that could affect achievement of
business goals and strategies, assessing the likelihood and potential
impact of significant risks, prioritizing risks and actions to be taken in
mitigation and/ or response, and reporting to managements Executive Risk
Steering Committee on actions to monitor, manage and mitigate significant
risks.
|
● |
Additionally, the CFO, Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel periodically report on the Companys risk management policies and practices to relevant Board Committees and to the full Board. The Board is regularly updated on specific risks in the course of its review of corporate strategy, business plans and reports to the Board by its respective Committees. |
The Board considers its role in risk oversight when evaluating our Corporate Governance Guidelines and its leadership structure. Both the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Boards leadership structure facilitate the Boards oversight of risk and communication with management. Our independent Chairman and our CEO are focused on CVS Healths risk management efforts and ensure that risk matters are appropriately brought to the Board and/or its Committees for their review.
Stockholder Outreach
Because the Company values each of its stockholders and their opinions, we have regularly interacted with our stockholders on a variety of matters. Again in 2016, at the direction of the Board, the Company engaged in a robust stockholder outreach effort to best understand and address any concerns stockholders might have. Additional details regarding our outreach effort and the actions taken are found on pages 6,7 and 42 of this proxy statement.
Much of our dialogue with stockholders was focused on compensation-related matters, including the results of our most recent say-on-pay vote. The 80% vote in favor fell short of our expectations, and we received a great deal of feedback on that subject. In addition to compensation-related matters, a number of corporate governance matters were discussed with our stockholders during the outreach process, including our proxy access by-law amendment, frequency of our say-on-pay votes, board tenure and composition, board evaluations and board diversity. As a result of these discussions, in early 2017 the Board approved a change to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, memorializing its existing practice of including diverse candidates in each board search. Stockholders also were appreciative and supportive of the Companys proxy access by-law, which was adopted in January 2016. Based on stockholder input, the Board is recommending the continuation of annual say-on-pay votes.
We believe that taking the responsive actions summarized above will continue to strengthen our relationships with our stockholders and provide positive improvements in the areas identified.
Stockholder Rights
Under our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Charter) and our Amended and Restated By-laws (By-laws), our stockholders have the right to call a special meeting of stockholders and to act by written consent that is less than unanimous. Holders of at least 25% of our common stock can call a special meeting or request an action by written consent by following the procedures described in our Charter and By-laws. Our stockholders also have the right to proxy access, as described below. Our Charter and By-laws are available to stockholders at no charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary.
Contact With the Board, the Chairman and Other Independent Directors
Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Board, the independent Chairman of the Board or with the independent directors as a group may do so by writing to them care of CVS Health Corporation, One CVS Drive, MC 1160, Woonsocket, RI 02895. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has approved a process for handling letters received by the Company and addressed to the Board, the independent Chairman of the Board or to independent members of the Board. Under that process, our Corporate Secretary reviews all such correspondence and regularly forwards to the Board copies of all correspondence that, in her opinion, deals with the functions of the Board or its Committees or that she otherwise determines requires their attention.
Code of Conduct
CVS Health has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our CEO, CFO and Chief Accounting Officer. Our Code of Conduct is available on our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com and will be provided to stockholders without charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary. We intend to post amendments to or waivers from our Code of Conduct (to the extent applicable to our executive officers or directors) at that location on our website within the timeframe required by SEC rules.
Related Person Transaction Policy
In accordance with SEC rules, the Board has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy. The Audit Committee has been designated as the Committee responsible for reviewing, approving or ratifying any related person transactions under the Policy. The Committee reviews the Policy on an annual basis and will amend the Policy as it deems appropriate.
20 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: BOARD STRUCTURE AND PROCESSES |
Pursuant to the Policy, all executive officers, directors and director nominees are required to notify our General Counsel or Corporate Secretary of any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, involving the Company in which an executive officer, director, director nominee, five percent beneficial owner or any immediate family member of such a person has a direct or indirect material interest. Such officers, directors, nominees, five percent beneficial owners and their immediate family members are considered related persons under the Policy. For the above purposes, immediate family member includes a persons spouse, parents, siblings, children, in-laws, step-relatives and any other person sharing the household (other than a tenant or household employee).
The General Counsel or the Corporate Secretary presents any reported new related person transactions, and significant proposed transactions involving related persons that might be deemed to be related person transactions, to the Audit Committee at its next regular meeting, or earlier if appropriate. The Committee reviews these transactions to determine whether the related person involved has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. The Committee may conclude, upon review of all relevant information, that the transaction does not constitute a related person transaction, and thus that no further review is required under the Policy. On an annual basis, the Committee reviews previously approved related person transactions, under the standards described below, to determine whether such transactions should continue.
In reviewing a related person transaction or proposed transaction, the Committee considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including without limitation the commercial reasonableness of the terms, the benefit and perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to the Company, the availability and/or opportunity costs of alternate transactions, the materiality and character of the related persons direct or indirect interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person. The Committee does not approve or ratify a related person transaction unless it has determined that, upon consideration of all relevant information, the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
If after the review described above, the Committee determines not to approve or ratify a related person transaction (whether such transaction is being reviewed for the first time or has previously been approved and is being re-reviewed), the transaction will not be entered into or continued, as the Committee shall direct.
The Audit Committee reviewed certain transactions reported under the Policy and determined that no transactions constituted reportable related person transactions under the Policy.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our investor relations website at http:// investors.cvshealth.com/corporate-governance/documents and are also available to stockholders at no charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary. These Guidelines meet the listing standards adopted by the NYSE, on which our common stock is listed.
BOARD STRUCTURE AND PROCESSES |
THE BOARDS LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
David W. Dorman is our independent Chairman of the Board. The independent Chairman presides at all meetings of the Board, and works with our CEO to set Board meeting agendas and the schedule of Board meetings. In addition, the independent Chairman has the following duties and responsibilities:
● |
the authority to call, and to lead,
independent director sessions;
|
● |
the ability to retain independent
legal, accounting or other advisors in connection with these sessions;
|
● |
the responsibility to facilitate
communication and serve as a liaison between the CEO and the other
independent directors; and
|
● |
the duty to advise the CEO of the informational needs of the Board. |
The Board believes that Board independence and oversight of management will be maintained effectively through the independent Chairman, the Boards composition and its Committee system.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
21 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
In 2016, the Board utilized five standing committees. The table below provides membership and meeting information for each of the committees during 2016. For further details regarding current committee membership and activities see pages 22-28.
NAME |
AUDIT
COMMITTEE |
MANAGEMENT
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE |
NOMINATING
AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
PATIENT
SAFETY AND CLINICAL QUALITY COMMITTEE |
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE |
Richard M. Bracken | ● | C | |||
C. David Brown II | C | ● | ● | ||
Alecia A. DeCoudreaux | ● | ● | |||
Nancy-Ann M. DeParle | ● | ● | |||
David W. Dorman | ● | C | ● | ||
Anne M. Finucane | ● | ● | |||
Larry J. Merlo | ● | ||||
Jean-Pierre Millon | ● | ● | |||
Richard J. Swift | C | ● | |||
William C. Weldon | ● | ● | |||
Tony L. White | ● | ● | |||
2016 Meetings | 9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
C | Committee Chair |
| Audit Committee Financial Expert |
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and independent of the Company and management under the standards set forth in applicable SEC rules and the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. The Board designated each of Messrs. Swift and Millon as an audit committee financial expert, as defined under applicable SEC rules. The Board has approved a charter for the Committee, which can be viewed on our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com and also is available to stockholders without charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary.
Current Committee Members
(independent, photographed left to right)
● | Jean-Pierre Millon* |
● | Nancy-Ann DeParle |
● | Richard Swift (Chair)* |
● | Alecia DeCoudreaux |
* Audit Committee Financial Expert
Meetings in 2016: 9
22 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
Primary Responsibilities
Pursuant to its charter, the Committee assists the Board in its oversight of:
● |
the integrity of our financial
statements;
|
● |
the qualifications, independence and
performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, for
whose appointment the Committee bears principal
responsibility;
|
● |
the performance of our internal audit
function;
|
● |
our policies and practices with respect to risk
assessment and risk management, including discussing with management the
Companys major financial risk exposures and the steps that have been
taken to monitor and control such exposures;
|
● |
compliance with our Code of
Conduct;
|
● |
the review of our information governance
framework, including its privacy and information security programs, as
well as the cybersecurity aspects of the information security
program;
|
● |
the review of our business continuity and
disaster recovery program;
|
● |
the review of our environmental, health and safety
program;
|
● |
the review and ratification of any related
person transactions in accordance with our policy on such matters;
and
|
● | our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the review and oversight of matters related to compliance with Federal health care program requirements. |
Audit Committee Activities in 2016
The Audit Committee met nine times in 2016 and each member of the Committee attended all of its meetings while he or she was a member. Four of the Committees meetings were focused primarily on our quarterly financial reports, including our Form 10-K, Forms 10-Q and our related earnings releases. At each of these meetings the Committee reviewed the documents in depth with our CFO and our Chief Accounting Officer, as well as our Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Audit Executive, General Counsel and other key members of management. The Committee also received reports from our internal audit department and our independent outside audit firm, Ernst & Young. The Committee regularly meets with Ernst & Young outside the presence of management, and also meets individually with members of management, including the CCO, the chief compliance officer for Omnicare and the head of Internal Audit. In addition to its responsibilities related to our financial statements, the Committee plays a primary role in risk oversight, including reviews of our enterprise risk management program, cybersecurity efforts, business continuity and disaster recovery program, privacy programs, and environmental, health and safety program. The Committee also reviews our legal and regulatory compliance program on a quarterly basis, including oversight of the Companys compliance with its Corporate Integrity Agreements, or CIAs. During 2016, the Committee provided the required annual certification of compliance with the Companys 2014 CIA, and also assumed oversight of a new CIA related to its institutional pharmacy services (long-term care) operations. The Committee provided the report found on page 30 of this proxy statement, recommending the inclusion of the Companys audited financial statements in its Form 10-K.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
23 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent of the Company and management under the standards set forth in the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. The Board has approved a charter for the Committee, which can be viewed on our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com and also is available to stockholders without charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary.
Current Committee Members
(independent, photographed left to right)
● | David Brown |
● | Anne Finucane |
● | David Dorman (Chair) |
● | William Weldon |
● | Richard Bracken |
Meetings in 2016: 5
Primary Responsibilities
Pursuant to its charter, the Committee has responsibility for:
● |
identifying individuals qualified to become Board members consistent with
criteria approved by the Board;
|
● |
recommending to the Board director nominees for election at
the next annual or special meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be
elected or to fill any vacancies or newly-created directorships that may occur
between such meetings;
|
● |
recommending directors for appointment to Board Committees;
|
● |
making recommendations to the
Board as to determinations of director independence;
|
● |
evaluating Board and Committee
performance;
|
● |
considering matters of corporate governance and reviewing, at least
annually, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and overseeing compliance with
such Guidelines; and
|
● | reviewing and considering our policies and practices on issues relating to corporate social responsibility, charitable contributions, political spending practices and other significant public policy issues. |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Activities in 2016
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times in 2016 and, except for two absences for one member of the Committee due to unavoidable conflicts, each member of the Committee attended all of its meetings. Throughout the year the Committee evaluated and continues to evaluate potential candidates for future election to the Board. In addition, the Committee reviewed the Companys political activities and expenditures in depth during two of its meetings, and reviewed the Companys corporate social responsibility roadmap, Prescription for a Better World, as well as the corporate social responsibility report itself. The Committee oversaw the development of the Companys proxy access by-law, which was finalized and recommended by the Committee, and adopted by the Board, in January 2016. The Committee also oversaw the evaluation process for the Board and its Committees in 2016, which consisted of an in-depth interview of each director by the Companys General Counsel. At the completion of the interview process, the General Counsel reviewed the results with the Committee and the Board, and a number of enhancements to the Board and Committee meeting process resulted. In addition, the Committee received updates regarding legal and regulatory developments related to corporate governance, as well as updates on the proxy season and stockholder communications.
24 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE |
Each member of the Management Planning and Development Committee is independent of the Company and management under the standards set forth in applicable SEC rules and the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. No Committee member participates in any of our employee compensation programs and none is a current or former officer or employee of CVS Health or its subsidiaries. At its meetings, non-members, such as the CEO, the CFO, the Chief Human Resources Officer, the General Counsel, other senior human resources and legal officers, or external consultants, may be invited to provide information, respond to questions and provide general staff support. However, no CVS Health executive officer is permitted to be present during any discussion of his or her compensation or performance, and the Committee regularly exercises its prerogative to meet in executive session without management.
The Committees responsibilities are specified in its charter. The charter, as approved by the Board, may be viewed on our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com and also is available to stockholders without charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary.
|
|
Meetings in 2016: 5 |
Current Committee
Members
(independent, photographed left to right) |
●
David
Dorman
●
Tony
White
●
David Brown
(Chair)
●
Anne
Finucane
●
William
Weldon
|
Primary Responsibilities
Pursuant to its charter, the Committee:
● |
oversees our compensation and
benefits policies and programs generally;
|
● |
evaluates the performance of
designated senior executives, including the CEO;
|
● |
in consultation with our other
independent directors, oversees and sets compensation for the
CEO;
|
● |
oversees and sets compensation
for our designated senior executives;
|
● |
reviews and recommends to the
Board compensation (including cash and equity-based compensation) for our
non-employee directors; and
|
● | prepares and recommends to the full Board the inclusion of the Report of the Compensation Committee that is found on page 34 of this proxy statement. |
The Committee may delegate its authority relating to employees other than executive officers and directors as it deems appropriate and may also delegate its authority relating to ministerial matters.
Management Planning and Development Committee Activities in 2016
The Management Planning and Development Committee met five times in 2016 and, except for one absence due to an unavoidable conflict, each member of the Committee attended all of its meetings. In addition to reviewing the independence of its advisor as described below, the Committee devoted substantial time to its oversight of the Companys compensation and benefit programs as part of its annual governance process. This review is aimed at ensuring that the Company is providing its employees with compensation and benefit programs that are appropriate. The Committee received updates on compensation trends and legislative and regulatory developments. The Committee also reviewed the Companys compensation programs, retirement, health and welfare plans. In addition, the Committee devoted considerable time to CVS Healths stockholder outreach efforts and the feedback received from investors. The Committees review of executive compensation matters and its decisions, including changes made in response to input from our stockholders, is discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 35 of this proxy statement.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
25 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Committee is responsible for reviewing and assessing potential risk arising from the Companys compensation policies and practices. In 2016, the Company performed a comprehensive risk assessment of its compensation policies and practices to ascertain any potential material risks that may be created by the programs. Included in its assessment were all major components of the Companys compensation programs, including: the mix between annual and long-term compensation; short-term incentive program design; long-term incentive program performance measures; incentive plan performance criteria and corresponding objectives; a comparison of the Companys programs with those of its peer group; the Companys severance and change-incontrol policies; its recoupment policy; its share retention requirements and ownership guidelines; and the Internal Audit Departments review of the controls regarding the Companys long-term incentive program. The Committee considered the findings of the assessment and concluded that the Companys compensation programs are aligned with the interests of its stockholders, appropriately reward pay for performance, and do not promote excessive risk-taking.
Independent Consultant
Exequity LLP is the Committees independent compensation consultant. Exequity provides no other services to the Company. Exequitys fees for executive compensation consulting to the Committee for 2016 were $244,763. During 2016, Exequity:
● |
Collected, organized and presented quantitative
competitive market data for a relevant competitive peer group with respect
to executive officers target, annual and long-term compensation
levels;
|
● |
Developed and delivered an annual Committee
briefing on legislative and regulatory developments and trends in
executive compensation and their implications for CVS Health;
and
|
● | Analyzed market data and provided recommendations for non-employee director compensation to the Committee for approval by the Board. |
The Committee believes that the advice it receives from Exequity is objective and not influenced by any other business relationship. The Committee and Exequity have policies and procedures in place to preserve the objectivity and integrity of the executive compensation consulting advice, including:
● |
The Committee has the sole authority to retain
and terminate the executive compensation consultant;
|
● |
The consultant reports to the Committee Chair
and has direct access to the Committee without management
involvement;
|
● |
While it is necessary for the consultant to
interact with management to gather information, the Committee determines
if and how the consultants advice can be shared with management;
and
|
● | The Committee regularly meets with the consultant in executive session, without management present, to discuss recommendations. |
The Committee conducts an annual review of the independence of its compensation consultant, taking into account the standards above, the items required to be considered under the NYSE listing standards and applicable rules and regulations. The Committee determined that its compensation consultant is independent and that its consultants work does not raise any conflicts.
26 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD |
PATIENT SAFETY AND CLINICAL QUALITY COMMITTEE |
Each member of the Patient Safety and Clinical Quality Committee is independent of the Company and management under the standards set forth in applicable SEC rules and the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. The Board has approved a charter for the Committee, which can be viewed on our website at http://investors.cvshealth.com and also is available to stockholders without charge upon request to our Corporate Secretary.
In light of the Companys expanded offerings throughout the spectrum of health care, this Committee was formed in March 2016. Its focus is on the quality of pharmacy and medical care being delivered by the Company.
2016 Committee
Members
(independent, photographed left to
right)
● | Jean-Pierre Million |
● | Nancy-Ann DeParle |
● | Richard Bracken (Chair) |
● | Tony White |
● | Alecia DeCoudreaux |
Meetings in 2016: 4
Primary Responsibilities
Pursuant to its charter, the Committee:
● |
assists the Board in its
oversight of the Companys policies and procedures relating to the
delivery of quality pharmacy and medical care to its customers and
patients, including clinical quality, patient safety and experience,
management of health care claims against the enterprise and regulatory
review by relevant authorities;
|
● |
reviews matters and receives
reports concerning the quality performance of the Companys (1) pharmacy
and medical care, such as (a) dispensing, compounding, and infusion
services and (b) nursing and medical clinic operations; (2) patient safety
and experience; (3) the management of health care claims against the
enterprise; and (4) boards of pharmacy and nursing
activity;
|
● |
reviews matters concerning
efforts to (1) improve the quality of pharmacy and medical care, patient
safety and experience, (2) reduce health care claims against the
enterprise, and (3) enhance boards of pharmacy and nursing activity; and
|
● | takes such other actions and performs such services as may be referred to it from time to time by the Board, including the conduct of special reviews as it may deem necessary or appropriate to fulfill its responsibilities. |
Patient Safety and Clinical Quality Committee Activities in 2016
The Patient Safety and Clinical Quality Committee met four times in 2016 and each member of the Committee attended all of its meetings. The Committees meetings focused on a wide variety of matters related to the Companys provision of health care services across the enterprise, including retail, mail, specialty, specialty mail and long-term care pharmacy, retail clinic services provided by MinuteClinic, and drug compounding activities conducted by Coram and across the enterprise. The Committee received reports regarding regulatory activity by boards of pharmacy and nursing related to the Company and reviewed accreditations issued by various agencies to the Companys various business lines. The Committee received updates on health care-related claims against the Company, as well as steps being taken to minimize and mitigate those claims. The Committee also provided oversight in the development of a number of scorecards in various lines of business, and other efforts to measure and improve patient safety and clinical-effectiveness.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
27 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE |
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
At all times when the Board is not in session, the Executive Committee may exercise most of the powers of the Board, as permitted by applicable law.
The Executive Committee did not meet during 2016.
2016 Committee
Members
(photographed left to
right)
Meetings in 2016: None
BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE |
During 2016, there were seven meetings of the Board. Directors are expected to make every effort to attend the Annual Meeting, all Board meetings and the meetings of the Committees on which they serve. All of our directors at the time of our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended that Annual Meeting. In 2016, all but one director attended 100% of the meetings of the Board and the Committees of which he or she was a member. Ms. Finucane attended 67% of the meetings of the Board and the Committees of which she was a member, missing two sets of meetings due to unavoidable conflicts that arose in connection with her role as a Vice Chairman at Bank of America Corporation. The independent Chairman of the Board and the CEO use their best efforts to schedule Board and Committee meetings far enough in advance to avoid such conflicts, but they recognize unexpected and unresolvable conflicts sometimes occur. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee fully considered meeting attendance in its evaluation of nominees, and has reviewed dates for meetings in future years to ensure maximum attendance.
One Board meeting was our annual meeting of independent directors. The independent directors also regularly hold executive sessions during regularly scheduled Board meetings in which our management does not participate.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
CVS Healths approach to compensating non-employee directors for Board service is to provide directors with an annual retainer comprised of a mandatory 75% paid in shares of our common stock and 25% paid in cash (or up to 100% stock at the directors election). The payment of a significant portion of the annual retainer, and additional retainers as outlined below, in our common stock is consistent with our policy of using equity compensation to better align directors interests with stockholders. This also enhances the directors ability to meet and continue to comply with our stock ownership guidelines described below.
For the 2016-2017 Board year, the total annual retainer for non-employee directors remained $280,000, consisting of shares of our stock valued at $210,000 (the mandatory annual stock retainer) and a cash payment of $70,000 (unless the director elected to receive up to 100% of the annual retainer in shares of our common stock).
Additional retainers were paid to the Chairs of the Committees and the Board as follows: Nominating and Corporate Governance, $15,000; Patient Safety and Clinical Quality, $15,000; Management Planning and Development, $20,000; Audit, $25,000; and Independent Chairman of the Board, $275,000.
28 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS: NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
At least 75% of each additional retainer must be paid in shares of our common stock, with the remaining 25% paid in cash, unless the director elects to be paid an additional percentage in shares. Each retainer was paid in two equal installments, in May and November of 2016. Directors may elect to defer receipt of shares; deferred shares are credited with dividend equivalents to the extent dividends are paid to stockholders. There are no meeting fees.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RETAINER MIX | ||
|
ALL OTHER COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
Directors are eligible to participate in the employee discount program and are subject to the same terms of the program as our employees. Directors are generally reimbursed for business expenses incurred directly in connection with their roles and duties on the Board, such as services provided by an executive assistant, travel, meals and lodging. We allow all directors to enroll themselves and their eligible dependents in our prescription drug benefit program, paying the same premium rates as employees. If a director retires from the Board with at least five years of service, we will allow continued participation in the prescription drug benefit plan for life, but the director must bear the full cost of the premium after retirement.
The following table shows amounts paid to each of our non-employee directors in 2016.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 2016 |
NAME |
FEES EARNED
AND PAID IN CASH 1 ($) |
CASH FEES
ELECTED TO BE PAID IN STOCK 2 ($) |
STOCK
AWARDS 2 ($) |
ALL
OTHER
COMPENSATION 3 ($) |
TOTAL
($) |
|||||
Richard M. Bracken 4 | 74,524 | | 222,976 | 200 | 297,700 | |||||
C. David Brown II | | 75,000 | 225,000 | 2,056 | 302,056 | |||||
Alecia A. DeCoudreaux | | 70,000 | 210,000 | 200 | 280,200 | |||||
Nancy-Ann M. DeParle | 70,075 | | 209,925 | 200 | 280,200 | |||||
David W. Dorman | 92 | 142,408 | 427,500 | 200 | 570,200 | |||||
Anne M. Finucane | 70,075 | | 209,925 | | 280,000 | |||||
Jean-Pierre Millon | 70,075 | | 209,925 | 2,056 | 282,056 | |||||
Richard J. Swift | 76,347 | | 228,653 | 2,056 | 307,056 | |||||
William C. Weldon | | 70,000 | 210,000 | 200 | 280,200 | |||||
Tony L. White | 70,075 | | 209,925 | 2,056 | 282,056 |
1 | The amounts shown include cash payments made in lieu of fractional shares to Mmes. DeParle and Finucane and Messrs. Bracken, Dorman, Millon and White. |
2 | These awards are fully vested at grant and the amounts shown represent both the fair market value and the full fair value at grant. During 2016, each director received 2,290 shares of stock with a total value of approximately $210,000 (the mandatory annual stock retainer) on the date of grant; each director electing to receive the remaining annual retainer in stock also received 762 shares valued at $70,000 on the date of grant. Two directors also elected to receive their additional chair retainers in stock in lieu of cash. As of December 31, 2016, our directors had deferred receipt of shares of common stock as follows: Mr. Brown, 47,933 shares; Ms. DeCoudreaux, 6,409 shares; Ms. DeParle, 3,283 shares; Mr. Dorman, 16,130 shares; Ms. Finucane, 2,678 shares; Mr. Swift, 52,921; and Mr. Weldon, 12,904 shares. |
3 | Represents Company costs for director prescription benefits for Messrs. Brown, Millon, Swift and White. Also represents participation in our matching gifts program, under which director or employee contributors to the CVS Health Employee Political Action Committee may designate a charity to receive a matching contribution from the Company of up to $200. Mmes. DeCoudreaux and DeParle and Messrs. Bracken, Brown, Dorman, Millon, Swift, Weldon and White participated in this program. |
4 | Mr. Bracken became Chair of the Patient Safety and Clinical Quality Committee in March 2016. His compensation includes a pro rata retainer for the portion of the 2015-2016 Board year that he served as Chair of that Committee. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
29 |
ITEM 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and recommended to our full Board that it approve that appointment. We are submitting the appointment by the Committee to you for your ratification.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
During most of 2016, Committee was composed of four independent directors. Set forth below is the report of the Committee on its activities with respect to CVS Healths audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (audited financial statements).
● |
The Committee has reviewed and
discussed the audited financial statements with management;
|
● |
The Committee has discussed with
Ernst & Young, CVS Healths independent registered public accounting
firm, the matters required to be discussed under applicable auditing
standards;
|
● |
The Committee has received the
written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young pursuant to
applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding Ernst & Youngs
communications with the Committee concerning independence, and has
discussed with Ernst & Young its independence from the Company;
and
|
● |
Based on the review and discussions referred to above and relying thereon, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in CVS Healths Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, for filing with the SEC. |
|
|
|
Richard J. Swift, Chair |
Alecia A. DeCoudreaux |
|
|
|
|
Nancy-Ann M. DeParle |
Jean-Pierre Millon |
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRM INDEPENDENCE AND FEE APPROVAL POLICY
The Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee has retained Ernst & Young as CVS Healths external audit firm since September 2007. In order to assure continuing external auditor independence, the Committee periodically considers whether there should be a rotation of the audit firm. Further, in conjunction with the mandated rotation of the external audit firms lead engagement partner, the Committee and its chair are directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Youngs new lead engagement partner. Based on its most recent evaluation of Ernst & Young, the members of the Committee believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young to serve as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
All audit services, audit-related services and tax services were pre-approved by the Committee, and the Committee is ultimately responsible for audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of Ernst & Young. The Committee has considered whether Ernst & Youngs provision of services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Youngs independence. The Committees audit approval policy provides for pre-approval of audit, audit- related and tax services that are specifically described on an annual basis to the Committee and, in addition, individual engagements anticipated to exceed pre-established thresholds must be separately approved. The policy also requires specific approval by the Committee if total fees for audit-related and tax services would exceed total fees for audit services in any fiscal year. The policy authorizes the Committee to delegate to one or more of its members pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services, so long as such pre-approvals are reported to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
Representatives of Ernst & Young will be at the Annual Meeting to answer your questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.
If you do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, the Committee will reconsider its appointment, although in the event of reconsideration the Committee may determine that Ernst & Young should continue in its role. Even if you do ratify the appointment, the Committee retains its discretion to reconsider its appointment if it believes that reconsideration is necessary in the best interest of the Company and the stockholders.
30 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS: ITEM 2 |
FEES OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRM
The following table summarizes the fees paid to Ernst & Young for services rendered during fiscal 2016 and 2015.
FISCAL
YEAR
ENDED 12/31/16 |
FISCAL
YEAR
ENDED 12/31/15 |
|||
Audit Fees 1 | $10,360,000 | $10,680,969 | ||
Audit Related Fees 2 | $624,008 | $228,564 | ||
Tax Fees 3 | $2,985,026 | $2,001,278 | ||
All Other Fees | | |
1 |
Represents the aggregate fees and expenses billed for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the audit of our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year, the reviews of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, audits of our insurance captives, services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings for the fiscal year, and consultations on technical matters. |
2 |
Represents the aggregate fees billed for audit and other services that are typically performed by auditors, including audits of our employee benefit plans, compliance reporting, non-financial metric reporting and certain agreed upon procedures. |
3 |
Represents the aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, consulting and related services. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
31 |
ITEM 3: PROPOSAL TO APPROVE, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, THE COMPANYS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT |
BACKGROUND
We are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) and the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement. Although the advisory vote is not binding upon the Company, the Management Planning and Development Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, values our stockholders opinions and will continue to consider the outcome of the vote in its ongoing evaluation of our executive compensation program.
At CVS Health, our executive compensation philosophy and practice reflect our unwavering commitment to paying for performance both short- and long-term. We define performance as the achievement of results against challenging internal financial targets that take into account our results relative to that of our peer companies, as well as industry and market conditions. We believe that our multi-faceted executive compensation plans, with their integrated focus on short- and long-term metrics, provide an effective framework by which progress against our strategic goals may be appropriately measured and rewarded.
OUR 2016 VOTE; STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH
Following our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Committee reviewed the results of the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation that was held at the meeting with respect to the 2015 compensation actions and decisions for the named executive officers. Approximately 80% of votes were cast in favor of the proposal; this was lower than the support received in 2015 (94% in favor). During the fall of 2016, we contacted our 50 largest stockholders, holders of more than 50% of our common stock, to get their views on our program as well as the required vote on the frequency of the say on pay vote. We conducted meetings with many investors and one of the leading proxy advisory firms. The stockholders that we spoke with generally approved of our core compensation principles and our executive compensation program, but some of them offered suggestions for improvements to our program or our disclosure. After careful consideration, the Committee implemented several changes to our plan design including:
● |
reducing maximum awards under the
Executive Incentive Plan (EIP);
|
● |
implementing limits on discretion
under the EIP;
|
● |
adopting vesting schedules for
dividend equivalents on restricted stock units (RSUs); and
|
● |
revising the total shareholder return (TSR) modifier for the 2017-2019 cycle that adjusts for performance above and below the 50 th percentile. |
We also improved the disclosure of our performance metrics and how they correlate to the creation of long-term value for our stockholders.
OUR 2016 PERFORMANCE AND PAY ACTIONS
2016 was a successful year for the Company. We had record revenues and cash flow from operations and generated healthy profit growth across the enterprise. We also returned more than $6 billion to stockholders through dividends and share buybacks. However, we set challenging internal goals which resulted in below-target level annual bonus payments. Strong performance and our disciplined approach to capital allocation contributed to the satisfaction of the maximum performance levels under the 2014-2016 long-term performance awards, despite a decline in our stock price due to industry-wide pressures on reimbursement, drug pricing and headwinds created by restricted networks adopted by payors in 2016.
The value of our named executive officers compensation is significantly influenced by the value of our stock. Approximately 70% of target total compensation is provided through stock-based pay (stock options, RSUs and the performance-based Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)). As a result of our long vesting periods and the two-year holding requirement for net shares issued under the LTIP, the members of our executive team, like our stockholders, have been affected by the decrease in stock price and only ultimately achieve the full value of their equity compensation by creating long-term stockholder value.
32 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED MATTERS: ITEM 3 |
CONCLUSION; RESOLUTION
We urge stockholders to read the letter from the Committee found on page 34 and the CD&A beginning on page 35 of this proxy statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative appearing on pages 57 through 66, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs. The Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the CD&A are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our NEOs reported in this proxy statement has contributed to CVS Healths long-term success.
Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the CVS Health executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, as disclosed pursuant to the SECs compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosures).
ITEM 4: PROPOSAL REGARDING THE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION
As described in Item 3 above, our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, the so-called say-on-pay proposal. This Item 4 affords stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include a say-on-pay proposal in our proxy materials for future stockholder meetings for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting (often referred to as the say-when-on-pay proposal). Under this Item 4, stockholders may vote to have the say-on-pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years.
Our stockholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011, with a large majority voting to hold a say-on-pay vote every year, as then recommended by the Board. Though we currently hold our say-on-pay votes every year, there are valid arguments regarding the relative benefits of both annual and less frequent say-on-pay votes. After considering input from our stockholders, the preference evident from voting results at other Fortune 500 companies, and practical commentary that has become widely available with respect to the say-when-on-pay vote since its implementation, our Board is again recommending that the say-on-pay vote be held on an annual basis.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Company, the Board or the Management Planning and Development Committee. However, the Board and the Committee value the opinions expressed by stockholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting a say-on-pay vote. Unless and until the Board determines otherwise, the next say-when-on-pay vote will occur at our 2023 Annual Meeting, since this vote is required to be held every six years.
Stockholders may cast a vote on the preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of every one year, every two years, or every three years (or abstaining) when voting in response to the resolution set forth below.
RESOLVED, that the stockholders recommend, on an advisory basis, that after the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company conduct any required stockholder advisory vote on the executive compensation of the Companys named executive officers as set forth in the Companys proxy statement should be every year, every two years, or every three years in accordance with such frequency receiving the greatest number of votes cast for this resolution.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
33 |
DEAR CVS HEALTH
CORPORATION
STOCKHOLDER,
As the members of the Management Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Directors, we are responsible for overseeing the design and implementation of competitive compensation programs that further the interests of stockholders and demonstrate strong pay-for-performance. This responsibility includes listening to and considering your views on executive compensation.
The Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) that follows describes what we pay, why we pay it, and how we made our pay decisions for 2016. It also demonstrates how our executive pay program reflects our compensation philosophy and our long-term corporate strategy. In addition, the program reflects the actions we took based on your feedback. For example:
● |
Beginning with 2017 grants, dividend
equivalents on RSUs will only be paid if and when the underlying award
vests.
|
● |
We reduced the maximum Executive
Incentive Plan (EIP) award opportunity to align with the broad-based
Management Incentive Plan (MIP) (maximum bonus is 200% of
target).
|
● |
We formalized the guardrails we use
for discretionary adjustments for superior performance under the EIP (no
more than 25% of the calculated payout under the
MIP).
|
● |
We revised the total shareholder return (TSR) modifier for the 2017-2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) award by adjusting awards by +/- 25% for performance above or below the 50 th percentile. |
We remain firm in our belief that our compensation programs drive the right behaviors for our executives, which in turn benefits our stockholders by driving our business strategies and goals. Though in the short-run the stock price may not correlate with these actions, we believe our stockholders interests are best served over time by a balanced compensation program that takes a long-term, holistic view of our business strategy and emphasizes the drivers of long-term value creation.
You can find additional information in this Proxy Statement as well as the Annual Report, both of which can be found on the Companys website (www.cvshealth.com) or our annual meeting website (www.cvshealthannualmeeting.com).
|
|
|
|
|
||||
C. David Brown
II
(Chairman) |
David W. Dorman | Anne M. Finucane | William C. Weldon | Tony L. White |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
We met with management to review and discuss the CD&A. Based on that review and discussion, we recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement.
34 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY |
Our 2016 compensation programs:
● |
Are tailored to our short- and
long-term
business strategies and drive
performance
,
|
● |
Reflect the
rapidly changing health care landscape
,
|
● |
Drive
sustainable performance
in an
era where human, social, natural, and intellectual capital are joining
financial and operating capital as performance drivers,
and
|
● |
Operate within strong governance parameters. |
Our business performance showcases our financial discipline, conservative management, strong track record and focus on stockholder returns. In 2016 we delivered:
|
||||||
15.8%
net revenue growth |
9.3%
growth in operating profit |
GAAP EPS
growth of 6.2% |
||||
Return of
|
Return on
|
Outperformed
the
|
||||
The rapidly changing health care landscape includes uncertainties concerning health care policy and the exclusion of CVS Pharmacy from certain health plan retail networks, resulting in the loss of prescription volume beginning in late 2016. Together, these have created a headwind for 2017. Our compensation, both the cash component and the value of our outstanding stock awards, is and should be affected by such factors, whether or not those factors are within managements ability to influence.
We are committed to helping people on their path to better health. Our values of innovation, collaboration, caring, integrity and accountability affect how we drive performance. We are strongly committed to evaluating and incenting management to remain focused on drivers of sustainable performance , even though we recognize that this focus is not always reflected in the stock price. Our annual stockholder outreach to holders of over 50 percent of our shares confirms strong support for this commitment and for the value we place on other forms of capitalincluding human, natural, social and intellectual:
● |
We include retail service and client
satisfaction in our pay calculations.
|
● |
Our decision to remove tobacco from
pharmacy stores continues to show positive results by reinforcing the
value of our brand in health care.
|
● |
We value the recruiting and reputation advantages of placing first in our sector of Worlds Most Admired Companies, of placing third in Fast Moneys list of 50 Most Innovative Companies, and of being one of Forbes Most Admired Brands. |
Finally, our compensation program is implemented by a board that maintains good corporate governance practices. For example:
● |
We have an independent board
chair,
|
● |
We do not have a staggered board,
poison pill, supermajority voting requirements, or a dual class
capitalization structure,
|
● |
Our stockholders have proxy access,
special meeting, written consent and majority voting
rights,
|
● |
Our Board is characterized by
diversity of background, race, gender and ethnicity,
and
|
● |
We engage in regular stockholder engagement and are responsive to stockholder input. |
We seek your voting support for our pay programs. We encourage you to consider this summary in the context of the important details that follow.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
35 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
What is your executive compensation philosophy?
Our executive compensation program is governed by five core principles that drive our executive compensation philosophy:
Management and the Committee believe these principles motivate our executive officers to take personal responsibility for the performance of the business, continually improve our results and operations and deliver long-term stockholder value, consistent with our core values. Our pay practices align with our core compensation principles and facilitate our implementation of those principles. They also demonstrate our commitment to sound compensation and governance practices.
What were the specific elements of compensation for 2016?
The main compensation elements of our executive compensation program remained unchanged in 2016:
● |
competitive base
salaries,
|
● |
annual cash incentives,
and
|
● |
long-term incentive plan awards. |
The majority of our executive compensation program is at risk; no more than 15% of any named executive officers target compensation is fixed.
Were there any changes in the Companys executive compensation program in 2016?
Meaningful dialogue with our stockholders continues to contribute to our decisions on compensation. Last fall, we contacted our top institutional stockholders who collectively own more than 50 percent of our shares and spoke with representatives of many large institutional stockholders to get their views on our compensation program. Based on these discussions and other input, we have made a number of enhancements to further link the Companys compensation programs with the Companys business and talent strategies and the long-term interests of our stockholders, such as:
● |
reducing the maximum award levels
under our EIP,
|
● |
adopting guardrails for using
positive discretion,
|
● |
improving disclosure around plan
metrics and discretionary elements of
compensation
|
● |
adopting vesting schedules for
dividend equivalents commencing with grants made in 2017, and
|
● |
revising the TSR modifier for the 2017-2019 LTIP to reduce payouts for performance below the 50 th percentile. |
Did your NEOs get raises for 2016?
No, after consideration of competitive market rates, the base salaries for our executive officers in 2016 remain unchanged from 2015 levels.
How do you determine bonuses under the Executive Incentive Plan?
Our short-term bonus plan pool under the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) was equal to 0.5% of Adjusted Income from Continuing Operations. However, actual awards were made with reference to our broad-based plan (MIP), that relates payment to achievement with respect to three performance metrics: (1) MIP Adjusted Operating Profit (weighted at 80%) and a combination of (2) retail customer service and (3) PBM client satisfaction (weighted together at 20%). Although our financial and service results were strong in 2016, we did not meet our challenging internal targets for short-term awards. As a result of stringent performance targets and lagging retail results, the MIP funded at 81.2% of target. When approving bonuses for 2016, the Committee considered the Companys strong consolidated financial performance during 2016 in earnings growth, cash flow from operations and value returned to stockholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases. However, the Committee also considered that earnings performance fell shy of the higher mid-year financial goals announced during our quarterly earnings call in August 2016. Finally, the Committee adjusted bonuses for executives in reflection of the individual performance of each NEO together with the subjective achievement of strategic and operational goals.
The annual bonus payments for the NEOs were, on average, 15% below the MIP funding formula and 38% lower than they were in 2015.
36 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY |
Do you limit the amount by which an award can exceed MIP funding?
Yes. The EIP is a pool-based plan for tax deductibility purposes. As part of its determination of individual awards, the Committee reviews all EIP awards with reference to the formula-driven results of the broad-based MIP applied to each executives target award expressed as a percent of salary: [salary × target % × MIP funding %]. Just as for our other colleagues, individual awards may vary based on performance, but for our NEOs, awards are limited to no more than 25% above MIP funding and no more than 200% of target.
Do the 2016 equity grants reflect 2016 performance?
No, the equity grants reported in the Summary Compensation Table were made in April 2016 and reflect strong company and individual results in 2015. During 2015, the Company achieved superior financial results and completed the acquisitions of Omnicare, Inc. and the pharmacies and clinics of Target Corporation. Additional information about the 2016 equity awards for each of our NEOs, including stock option exercise price and the number of shares subject to each award, is shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 59. Additional information about the 2015 performance of each NEO can be found in our 2016 Proxy Statement.
What was the payout for the 2014-2016 LTIP cycle?
Our 2014-2016 long-term incentive awards paid out at the maximum level of 200% as a result of our exceeding the performance target for return on net assets for the three year period. TSR over the same period was 35% resulting in a modifier of 1.0. We are currently estimating a payout below target for the 2015-2017 award cycle. In addition, beginning with the 2017-2019 cycle, the TSR modifier prorates for performance above and below the 50 th percentile.
Why cant we find the stock portion of the 2016-2018 LTIP in the Summary Compensation Table?
As we discussed in last years proxy, during our fall 2015 stockholder outreach, our stockholders indicated a preference that, on a going forward basis, our LTIP awards pay out in shares, rather than cash and shares as had been our historical practice. After considering this stockholder feedback, the MP&D Committee made this change prospectively, beginning with the 2016-2018 LTIP performance cycle. We noted in last years proxy that this change would result in different reporting of the LTIP awards in this years Summary Compensation Table. The change results from the application of the SEC disclosure rules to an LTIP award that is fully denominated in cash until it vests and is then settled in stock. Specifically,
● |
The value of the LTIP award for the
three-year cycle beginning in 2016 (at threshold, target and maximum
performance levels) appears in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
on page 59.
|
● |
The value of the actual vested award
for that same three-year cycle will appear in the Summary Compensation
Table in the proxy reporting 2018 compensation, which will be the year the
award vests and the final performance-based payout is
calculated.
|
● |
The full amount paid upon vesting (in the form of shares of common stock subject to a two-year holding requirement) will appear under the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table in the proxy reporting 2018 compensation. The LTIP award is a cash denominated award even though it is settled in shares. Under SEC disclosure rules, the award is reported upon vesting, not at grant. |
Why is the reporting different?
Historically, the LTIP awards were bifurcated in the Summary Compensation Table with half, the stock portion, being reported at the time of grant (i.e., at the beginning of the cycle), and the remaining half, the cash portion, reported three years later upon vesting (i.e., at the conclusion of the cycle). This reporting although performed in accordance with the SEC rules did not fully reflect either the structure of the grants as cash denominated awards or the results of the performance metrics and TSR modifier for the stock portion of the LTIP reported at the time of grant. By reporting the value of the LTIP award when it is actually paid, the Summary Compensation Table will reflect the full value received by the executives in the year of payment. We believe this insight is beneficial to our stockholders. To assist you with a year over year comparison, we have included a footnote to the Summary Compensation Table that identifies the additional amounts that would have been reported for each NEO if no change to the LTIP structure had been made to the 2016-2018 award.
Why do you award equity and LTIP?
Our long-term executive compensation for NEOs is split evenly between options and RSUs that vest over time, and the LTIP that vests based on the attainment of internal performance measures modified by TSR. This is consistent with the Committees desire to balance the types and amounts of awards to support the Companys strategy, drive the creation of long-term value, ensure that a substantial portion of long-term incentives are performance-based, and promote the retention of key talent. See pages 46-52 for more information about the elements of compensation and how they support the Companys long-term strategy.
Why is Return on Net Assets an appropriate metric for the Company?
Return on net assets is driven by generating strong net operating profit after taxes, while efficiently managing cash, inventory and accounts receivable. For the 2014-2016 cycle, net operating profit was largely driven by strong earnings over
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
37 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW |
the performance period, record increases in PBM net new sales, strong PBM client retention, and improvements in tax rates. Net assets were efficiently managed over the period including through strong performance of SilverScript (our Medicare Part D prescription drug plan) and efficient cash management practices. These operational and financial goals are directly aligned with the creation of long-term stockholder value over the performance period by driving stockholder return, controlling costs, and generating cash flow, which is then used in our capital allocation strategy.
How is the compensation program aligned with stockholder interests?
The value of our NEOs compensation is significantly influenced by the value of our stock. Approximately 70% of target total compensation is provided through stock-based pay (stock options, RSUs and LTIP awards). As a result of our long vesting periods and the two-year holding requirement for net shares issued under the LTIP, the members of our executive team, like our stockholders, have been affected by the decrease in stock price and only ultimately achieve the full value of their equity compensation by creating long-term stockholder value.
In 2016, our performance against operational and financial goals was strong, shown in our solid earnings, record cash flow from operations and significant cash returned to stockholders. However, we set challenging internal goals which resulted in below-target level annual bonus payments. Strong performance and our disciplined approach to capital allocation contributed to the satisfaction of the maximum performance levels under the 2014-2016 long-term performance awards, despite a decline in our stock price due to industry-wide pressures on reimbursement, drug pricing and headwinds created by restricted networks adopted by payors in 2016.
We believe the above supports our belief that our compensation program drives the right behaviors and that this benefits our stockholders by driving our business strategies and goals. We believe our stockholders interests are best served over time by a balanced compensation program that takes a long-term, holistic view of our business strategy and emphasizes the drivers of long-term value creation.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW |
BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
Our Business
We are a pharmacy innovation company helping people on their path to better health. At the forefront of a changing health care landscape, we have an unmatched suite of capabilities and the expertise needed to drive innovations that will help shape the future of health care. Through our more than 9,700 retail stores, more than 1,100 walk-in health care clinics, a leading pharmacy benefits manager with more than 80 million plan members, a dedicated senior pharmacy care business serving more than one million patients per year, expanding specialty pharmacy services and a leading stand-alone Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, we enable people, businesses, and communities to manage health in more affordable, effective ways.
38 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW |
2016 Business Highlights
NET REVENUES
($ billions)
1 year growth of 15.8% |
OPERATING
PROFIT ($ billions)
1 year growth of 9.3% |
2014-2016
RETURN ON
NET ASSETS (%) Exceeded target by 22% |
||||
|
|
|
||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER
|
ANNUAL CASH DIVIDENDS
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
For more information on our financial performance and strategy, please refer to our Annual Report available at www.cvshealthannualmeeting.com. Please also refer to page 56 of this proxy statement for additional information about how we calculate Return on Net Assets, a metric used in our Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
39 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW |
LEADING PRACTICES IN COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Our pay practices align with our core compensation principles and facilitate our implementation of those principles. They also demonstrate our commitment to sound compensation and governance practices.
Our executive compensation program motivates executive officers to take personal responsibility for the performance of CVS Health |
|
✓
Core
Executive Compensation Principles Designed to Promote Company Growth
✓
Performance Measures Aligned with Stockholder
Interests
✓
Majority of the Total Compensation Opportunity is
Performance-Based
✓
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) Awards Settled in Common
Stock that is Subject to Retention Requirement (Holding
Period)
✓
Stock Ownership Guidelines
|
We apply leading executive compensation practices |
|
✓
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups
✓
No Option Repricing
✓
No Recycling of Shares
✓
Recoupment Policy
✓
Broad Anti-Pledging and Hedging Policies
✓
Executive Severance Policy
✓
Limited Perquisites and Personal Benefits
✓
SERP Closed to New Participants
✓
Double Trigger Vesting of Equity Awards
✓
Board Committee Oversight of Comprehensive Annual
Compensation Program Risk Assessment
|
New this year |
|
✓
Dividend Equivalents on RSUs Paid Only When Awards
Vest
✓
Reduced Maximum Annual EIP Award to Align with
Broad-Based MIP
✓
Limited Positive Discretion on Annual Incentive Awards
✓
Revised Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Modifier for
2017-2019 LTIP to Adjust Above or Below the 50
th
Percentile
Relative Ranking
|
For more information on our compensation practices, please refer to pages 42-56 of this proxy statement. |
OUR COMPENSATION CORE PRINCIPLES
Our executive compensation program has five core principles that drive our executive compensation philosophy.
● |
Support, Communicate and Drive
Achievement
of our business strategies
and goals.
|
● |
Attract and Retain
the highest-caliber executive officers by
providing compensation opportunities comparable to those offered by other
companies with which we compete for business and
talent.
|
● |
Motivate High
Performance
from executive officers in
an incentive-driven culture by delivering greater rewards for superior
performance and reduced awards for
underperformance.
|
● |
Align Interest
of our executive officers and our stockholders, and
foster an equity ownership environment.
|
● |
Reward Achievement of short-term results as well as long-term stockholder value creation. |
Management and the Committee believe these principles motivate our executive officers to take personal responsibility for the performance of the business and deliver long-term stockholder value, consistent with CVS Healths values of Innovation, Collaboration, Caring, Integrity and Accountability.
40 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW |
How We Pay Our Executives
We achieve these objectives by employing the following elements of pay for our executives:
● |
Base
salary
|
● |
Annual cash
incentives
|
● |
Annual equity incentives in the form
of RSUs and stock options generally vesting over three to five
years
|
● |
Long-term incentives that reward
performance over a three-year period; beginning with the 2016 grant,
long-term incentive plan awards will be settled 100% in common stock that
will remain subject to a two-year holding
period
|
● |
Retirement and health
benefits
|
● |
Limited perquisites |
For more information on our compensation core principles, and how we pay our executives, please refer to pages 43-44 of this proxy statement. |
Our 2016 Executive Pay
The following shows the breakdown of reported 2016 compensation for our CEO and our other named executive officers.
CEO
89% Performance Aligned |
|||||
Base
Salary |
Annual
Incentive Awards |
RSUs and Options | LTIP | Other | |
7% | 10% | 33% | 46% | 4% | |
79% Long-Term |
All Other NEOs
85% Performance Aligned |
|||||
Base
Salary |
Annual
Incentive Awards |
RSUs and Options | LTIP | Other | |
12% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 3% | |
73% Long-Term |
For more information on reported 2016 compensation for our CEO and our other named executive officers, please refer to the Summary Compensation Table on page 57 of this proxy statement. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
41 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
CONSIDERATION OF MOST RECENT SAY ON PAY VOTE
Following our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Committee reviewed the results of the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation that was held at the meeting with respect to the 2015 compensation actions and decisions for the named executive officers. Approximately 80% of votes were cast in favor of the proposal; this was lower than the support received in 2015 (94% in favor). During the fall of 2016, we contacted our 50 largest stockholders, holders of more than 50% of our common stock, to get their views on our compensation program as well as the required vote on the frequency of say on pay. We conducted meetings with many investors and one of the leading proxy advisory firms and they were generally supportive of our executive compensation program. After careful consideration, the Committee implemented several changes in both plan design and disclosure including: reducing maximum awards under the EIP, implementing limits on discretion under the EIP, adopting vesting schedules for dividend equivalents on RSUs and revising the TSR modifier for the 2017-2019 LTIP cycle to adjust for performance above and below the 50 th percentile.
SUPPORTING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
We believe that our executive compensation program is consistent with our core compensation principles and is structured to assure that those principles are implemented. Through our stockholder outreach program, we have obtained helpful feedback on the program and have made certain modifications to implement our stockholders suggestions. We believe that our major stockholders generally approve of our core compensation principles and our executive compensation program, and we believe our stockholders as a whole should support them as well. |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
INTRODUCTION
This section explains how our executive compensation programs are designed and operate with respect to our named executive officers, who for 2016 are:
Larry J. Merlo | President and Chief Executive Officer |
David M. Denton | EVP and Chief Financial Officer |
Helena B. Foulkes | EVP and President CVS Pharmacy |
Jonathan C. Roberts | EVP and President CVS Caremark |
Thomas M. Moriarty | EVP, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel |
CVS HEALTH VALUES
When determining compensation awards and incentive payments, the Committee validates that results were achieved in line with the Companys five core values:
Innovation | Demonstrating openness, curiosity and creativity in the relentless pursuit of delivering excellence. |
Collaboration | Sharing and partnering with people to explore and create things that we could not do on our own. |
Caring | Treating people with respect and compassion so they feel valued and appreciated. |
Integrity | Delivering on our promises; doing what we say and what is right. |
Accountability | Taking personal ownership for our actions and their results. |
42 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION
The Committee believes each component of our executive compensation program furthers one or more of our five core principles, as outlined in the following chart:
BASE SALARY |
ANNUAL
CASH
INCENTIVE |
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) |
STOCK OPTIONS
AND
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS (RSUs) |
|||||
Fixed/Variable |
Fixed |
Variable |
||||||
Settled in |
Cash |
Stock |
||||||
Performance Rewarded |
Near-term |
Multi-year |
Long-term |
|||||
Target Basis |
Level commensurate with experience, role and responsibility |
Percentage of base salary based on competitive pay information, level of responsibility and desired mix of short- and long-term compensation |
Established at start of the three year cycle based on competitive pay information, level of responsibility, and desired mix of long-term incentive pay relative to other pay components |
Based on competitive pay information, level of responsibility and emphasis on long-term incentive pay as key component of the executive pay program |
||||
Support, Communicate and Drive Achievement |
|
|||||||
Attract and Retain |
|
|||||||
Motivate High Performance |
|
|||||||
Align Interests |
|
|||||||
Reward Achievement |
|
|||||||
Additional Information |
●
Reviewed annually and adjusted periodically based on
comparability to market peers, position responsibility
and individual qualifications
|
●
Payments reflect performance against operating profit
target
●
Maximum pool based on small percentage of Adjusted
Income from Continuing Operations and maximum payouts are capped as a
percentage of base salary
●
Committee evaluates financial and customer service
metrics and individual performance
|
●
Starting with the 2016-2018 performance cycle, awards
will be settled 100% in common stock
●
Minimum performance threshold (below which no payment
will be made) and capped maximum payouts
●
Executive prohibited from selling or trading shares for
two years following payment date
|
●
Annual nonqualified stock option grants with seven-year
terms that vest in four equal installments on first, second, third and
fourth anniversaries of the grant date and provide value only to the
extent that stock price appreciates
●
Annual RSU awards vest in two equal installments, on the
third and fifth anniversaries of grant date; dividend equivalents subject
to vesting beginning with 2017 awards
|
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
43 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
LINKING PAY TO PERFORMANCE
For 2016, as in previous years, the Committee reviewed a historical assessment of the relationship between CVS Healths performance and executive pay relative to our 2016 Peer Group (as described below). The following graphs illustrate the results of the Committees core assessment and illustrate the relationship between:
● |
our CEOs realized compensation
(base salary earned, incentives earned, value of restricted shares or RSUs
that vest during the period, the value of stock options exercised during
the period, and changes in the value of unvested restricted shares/RSUs
and unexercised options held during the period);
and
|
● |
CVS Healths performance as measured by total shareholder return (TSR) over one-year (2015), three-year (2013 2015) and five-year (2011 2015) periods (the most recent periods for which financial and compensation data were available at the time). |
In the following graphs, data points that are within the shaded area designate ideal pay-performance relationships. Data points below the shaded area identify peer companies where pay was lower than expected given the organizations performance, and those data points above the shaded area suggest the opposite.
3-YEAR CEO COMPENSATION
REALIZED PERCENTILE
VS. TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERCENTILE (2013-15) |
Similarly, the graph above illustrates the relationship between CEO pay rank and the relative return to stockholders for CVS Health and the 2016 Peer Group over the 3-year period 2013 to 2015. Relative compensation rests within the range that characterizes ideal pay-for-performance alignment. |
1-YEAR CEO COMPENSATION
REALIZED PERCENTILE
VS. TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERCENTILE (2015) |
In the graph above, compensation realized by CVS Healths CEO in 2015 ranked at the 61 st percentile, our TSR ranked at the 39 th percentile, indicating that our CEOs realized compensation was just outside the range that characterizes an ideal pay-for-performance alignment. |
5-YEAR CEO COMPENSATION
REALIZED PERCENTILE
|
Similarly, the graph above illustrates the relationship between CEO pay rank and the relative return to stockholders for CVS Health and the 2016 Peer Group over the 5-year period 2011 to 2015. Relative compensation rests within the range that characterizes ideal pay-for-performance alignment. |
The Committee believes this historical view validates that our executive compensation programs work as intended and link pay and performance. The Committee reviews this analysis annually after current data becomes available. |
44 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
These assessments demonstrate the Committees commitment to maintaining practices that ensure our executive compensation aligns with results in a manner that benefits our investors.
Executive Compensation Development and Review |
|
MP&D
Committee Meeting
●
Annual risk
assessment of compensation programs
●
Peer group reviewed
and established for executive compensation
benchmarking
●
Pay-for-performance
alignment for prior year reviewed
MP&D
Committee Meeting
●
Total compensation
market data for our executives reviewed
●
Stockholder comments
received on our executive compensation program
MP&D
Committee Meeting
●
Preliminary
financial results with respect to TSR, growth in revenue, GAAP operating
income growth, and diluted GAAP EPS growth reviewed
●
Preliminary
incentive award payouts calculated for the completed fiscal
year
CEO Performance
Review
●
The CEO presents a
self-assessment of his performance against his Board-approved strategic,
operational and financial goals
●
The Chairman of the
Board and the Committee Chair meet with the independent directors
privately to consider the CEOs performance
●
Committee members
consult with their independent compensation consultant and consider the
independent directors assessments in reviewing the CEOs total
compensation and determining his annual incentive compensation award and
equity compensation grants
MP&D
Committee Meeting
Other Named Executive Officer Final Decisions
●
For named executive
officers other than the CEO, final decisions on actual incentive awards
for the prior year are made in February after review of the CEOs
assessment of individual executive contribution and performance;
as described above, the CEOs performance is reviewed
separately
MP&D
Committee Meeting
Target Setting
●
The Committee
establishes financial targets and approves any base salary changes and
individual target incentive award levels for the current performance
year
|
The annual cycle of reviewing and developing the Companys executive compensation program and pay levels is a multi-step process that incorporates input from stockholders, management, peer group information, consideration of say-on-pay results, and both short- and long-term Company results compared to objectives, as well as consultation with the Committees independent compensation consultant. Throughout the annual compensation cycle, Committee decisions incorporate and reflect our deep commitment to the Companys five core values: Innovation, Collaboration, Caring, Integrity, and Accountability. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
45 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
Pay Positioning
CVS Health positions its aggregate target total direct compensation (base salary plus annual and long-term incentives) for its executive officers at competitive pay levels using the median of our peer group for reference. Positioning varies by job and the Committee considers a number of factors including market competitiveness, specific duties and responsibilities of the executive versus those of peers and succession planning. The Committee believes it is appropriate to reward the executive management team with compensation above the competitive median if the ambitious financial targets associated with its variable pay programs are exceeded in a way that is consistent with the Companys core values.
2016 Peer Group
The Committee assesses financial performance and compensation competitiveness against a group of peer companies that it selects based on input from its independent consultant. The 2016 peer group consisted of the following companies from across general industry that are similar to CVS Health in terms of industry affiliation, labor market, and operating and character image. The Committee reviews the peer group annually and periodically makes changes. No changes were made to the peer group for 2017.
CVS Health 2016 Compensation Peer Group |
CVS Health vs. Peer Group |
||||
● |
AmerisourceBergen Corp. |
|
|||
● |
The Boeing Company |
||||
● |
Comcast Corporation |
||||
● |
Costco Wholesale Corporation |
||||
● |
Express Scripts Holding Company |
||||
● |
The Home Depot, Inc. |
||||
● |
Johnson & Johnson |
||||
● |
The Kroger Co. |
||||
● |
McKesson Corporation |
||||
● |
Merck & Co., Inc. |
||||
● |
PepsiCo, Inc. |
||||
● |
Pfizer Inc. |
||||
● |
The Procter & Gamble Company |
||||
● |
Target Corporation |
||||
● |
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
||||
● |
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. |
||||
● |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
||||
● |
The Walt Disney Company |
||||
COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Fixed versus Variable Compensation; Cash versus Equity
Our pay-for-performance philosophy places a majority of an executive officers compensation at risk and emphasizes long-term incentives tied to individual and company performance as well as continued service. As a result, the only fixed compensation paid is base salary, which represents no more than 15 percent of a named executive officers total target compensation. Base salary and annual incentives are paid in cash. Beginning with the 2016 LTIP cycle, all long-term awards are paid entirely in stock. The greater focus on equity was adopted as the result of shareholder feedback. The previously awarded 2014 and 2015 LTIP cycles that are payable in 2017 and 2018 will be paid 50% in cash. As a result of the shift to 100% stock payments, the 2016 awards (for the 2016-2018 cycle) will be reported in the Summary Compensation Table in our 2019 Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC requirements.
Target Total Direct Compensation Mix (%) |
|
46 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
Performance Metrics Support Corporate Strategy and Long-Term Growth
The Committee recognizes that external factors that are beyond CVS Healths influence may impact its stock price. Consequently, the Committee believes that other performance indicators, including profitability and sound financial management of our working capital, should also be factored into our executive compensation program. By using a variety of pay vehicles and balancing short- and long-term awards, the Committee believes the program supports retention and long term growth creation because the metrics are measured independently and no one factor impacts all elements of performance.
ADJUSTED
OPERATING
PROFIT (MIP) |
RETAIL AND
PBM
SERVICE METRICS (MIP) |
RETURN ON
NET
ASSETS (LTIP) |
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN (LTIP) |
||||
Compensation Element |
Annual Cash Incentive |
LTIP and Equity |
|||||
Short-Term/Long-Term |
Short-Term |
Long-Term |
|||||
How Metrics
Support
|
●
Measures performance that is tracked by investors
●
Correlates to long-term growth
|
●
Measures client and customer satisfaction
●
Correlates to strategic operational goals
|
●
Measures performance in a way that is easily understood
by participants and valued by investors
●
Captures both income and balance sheet impacts,
including capital management actions
●
Provides a useful gauge of overall performance while
limiting the effects of factors management cannot influence
●
Correlates to creation of long-term stockholder value
and free cash flow
|
●
Measures performance relative to the broad market in
which we compete for talent and capital
|
|||
|
Base Salary
The Committee annually reviews the base salaries of all senior officers, including the named executive officers, and adjusts them periodically as needed to maintain competitiveness and consistency with evolving responsibilities. Upon consideration of this competitive market analysis and input from its consultant the Committee did not raise base salaries for our named executive officers.
2016 Salary Decisions |
EXECUTIVE NAME AND 2016 TITLE(S) | 2016 SALARY |
PERCENTAGE
INCREASE |
Larry J. Merlo, President and CEO | $1,630,000 | 0% |
David M. Denton, EVP and CFO | $850,000 | 0% |
Helena B. Foulkes, EVP and President CVS Pharmacy | $950,000 | 0% |
Jonathan C. Roberts, EVP and President CVS Caremark | $950,000 | 0% |
Thomas M. Moriarty, EVP, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel | $750,000 | 0% |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
47 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
Executive Incentive Plan Award Opportunity
The Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) is our annual cash bonus plan. Under the EIP, a maximum pool is created that can be used to pay annual incentives to named executive officers. For 2016, the pool formula was the lower of 0.5% of Adjusted Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to CVS Health ($31,500,000) or the sum of the total maximum potential awards under the EIP ($24,250,000). At the beginning of 2016, the Committee established a target for each named executive officer as a reference point to determine actual payouts. The target award opportunity is expressed as a percentage of base salary and is determined using a variety of factors, including CVS Healths 2016 peer group practices and the desired ratios of cash to non-cash and fixed to variable compensation for each named executive officer. The Committee also set individual limits on awards, expressed as a percentage of the pool and salary. EIP awards are not guaranteed and can range from 0% to 200% of the referenced target.
In 2017, the Committee reduced the maximum bonus under the EIP to align with the maximum bonus payable under the broad-based Management Incentive Plan (MIP) (200% of target). The EIP allows for individual performance-based discretionary adjustments. The Committee believes that the use of discretion to increase payouts should be limited and has adopted a policy limiting increases for superior performance to no more than 25% of the calculated payout based on MIP results [salary × target % × MIP funding %]. However, there is no limit on the Committees ability to exercise negative discretion to lower bonus payments for poor performance.
Since market compensation practices, including incentive opportunity, differ by job, our target bonus opportunities as a percentage of base salary vary for our named executive officers.
EXECUTIVE NAME |
2016
TARGET OPPORTUNITY AS A PERCENTAGE OF SALARY |
MAXIMUM
PORTION OF POOL |
FORMER
MAXIMUM PAYOUT AS A PERCENTAGE OF SALARY |
NEW
2017 MAXIMUM PAYOUT AS A PERCENTAGE OF SALARY |
Larry J. Merlo | 200% | 30.0% | 500% | 400% |
David M. Denton | 150% | 15.0% | 400% | 300% |
Helena B. Foulkes | 150% | 15.0% | 400% | 300% |
Jonathan C. Roberts | 150% | 15.0% | 400% | 350% 1 |
Thomas M. Moriarty | 150% | 15.0% | 400% | 300% |
1 |
In connection with his March 2, 2017 promotion to Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Roberts 2017 target opportunity was increased to 175% of salary. |
2016 EIP results and decision making
As a starting point for evaluating annual EIP awards, the Committee considered performance results under our MIP, a program maintained for a broad portion of the employee population, and for our named executive officers prior to the establishment of the EIP. For 2016, the MIP used MIP Adjusted Operating Profit, Retail Service and Client Satisfaction as performance metrics which the Committee believes are appropriate for annual incentives. The Committee believed that these metrics were challenging and would serve as an appropriate measure of managements success in delivering short-term stockholder value while maintaining momentum toward the achievement of longer-term financial progress.
The 2016 performance targets and actual results under the MIP were as follows:
48 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
The Committee exercises judgment in determining individual EIP awards and does not assign specific weights to the factors it considers. Its decisions were based primarily on the results of the 2016 MIP, which achieved funding of 81.2%. The below target MIP achievement was primarily attributable to the challenging nature of the performance targets and Retail performance. When approving bonuses for 2016, the Committee considered the Companys financial performance in 2016 compared to internal goals and guidance. The Committee adjusted bonuses for executives in reflection of the individual performance of each named executive officer together with the subjective achievement of certain strategic and operational goals. As a result, bonuses for our NEOs in 2016, on average, were 15% below MIP funding, and 38% lower than they were in 2015. See below for a summary of named executive officer performance in 2016.
2016 Individual Performance Assessment |
NEO |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CONSIDERED BY THE COMMITTEE |
Larry J. Merlo
|
Mr. Merlo contributed to the strong, overall financial results of the Company including PBM sales, cash flow from operations and earnings growth. The Committee also considered that performance was shy of mid-year guidance, TSR decreased, and the retail network exclusions resulted in a headwind for 2017. Mr. Merlo implemented a four part plan to return the Company to profitable growth in 2018. |
David M. Denton
|
Mr. Denton produced strong financial results in 2016 including record cash flow from operations and strong revenue and earnings growth. Mr. Denton continued his strong capital allocation plan that included returning over $6 billion to stockholders and the 13th consecutive annual increase in dividends. The Committee also considered that that performance was shy of mid-year guidance and TSR decreased. |
Helena B. Foulkes
|
Ms. Foulkes delivered improved front store margins as a result of her promotional strategy. She also made significant progress on digital platforms and the initiative to provide retail pharmacy services to other PBMs. The Committee also considered the mixed financial results for Retail including revenue and profit levels below plan. |
Jonathan C. Roberts
|
Mr. Roberts delivered above plan performance for PBM revenue, sales, and profitability along with strong client retention and satisfaction. These drove results under the MIP and LTIP. Under Mr. Roberts leadership, PBM clients experienced the lowest trend in four years as a result of adoption of innovative cost saving measures. |
Thomas M. Moriarty
|
Mr. Moriarty provided strong leadership and continued success in case resolution and regulatory compliance. Mr. Moriarty restructured the Government Affairs function and positioned the Company as a thought leader in health care at the state and federal level including advancing the value of the PBM and the role of the pharmacist. The Committee also considered that the retail network exclusions resulted in a headwind for 2017. |
2016 EIP Decisions |
RANGE OF POTENTIAL PAYMENTS | |||||||
EXECUTIVE NAME | BASE SALARY |
MIP
REFERENCE TARGET |
MINIMUM |
81.2%
OF REFERENCE TARGET BASED ON MIP RESULTS |
ACTUAL
EIP AWARD FOR 2016 |
ACTUAL EIP
AWARD AS A PERCENTAGE OF REFERENCE TARGET |
|
Larry J. Merlo | $1,630,000 | 200% | $0 | $2,647,120 | $2,382,000 | 73% | |
David M. Denton | $850,000 | 150% | $0 | $1,035,300 | $880,000 | 69% | |
Helena B. Foulkes | $950,000 | 150% | $0 | $1,157,100 | $752,000 | 53% | |
Jonathan C. Roberts | $950,000 | 150% | $0 | $1,157,100 | $1,157,000 | 81% | |
Thomas M. Moriarty | $750,000 | 150% | $0 | $913,500 | $776,000 | 69% |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
49 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The Committee believes strongly in
the use of long-term incentive compensation for executives to reinforce
four strategic objectives:
|
|
● |
Focus
on the importance of returns to stockholders and alignment with changes in
stock price;
|
● |
Promote the achievement of long-term performance goals;
|
● |
Encourage executive retention; and
|
● |
Promote meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by executives. |
The key elements of the Companys long-term incentive compensation plans (LTI plans) are:
● |
an
annual stock option and RSU grant, which vest upon continued employment
with the Company, and
|
● |
long-term performance incentive awards under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) to reward financial progress over a three-year period. |
The Committee believes that the LTI plans properly balance the incentives required to drive achievement of the four strategic objectives above, with the amount and timing of the rewards dependent on the successful achievement of Company objectives. The structure also reinforces the alignment between executive and stockholder interests. All three of these long-term compensation elements are delivered under the provisions of our 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (2010 ICP).
To determine the overall LTI plan opportunity and appropriate mix of equity instruments, the Committee considers a variety of factors, including competitive market positioning against comparable executives of the companies in the 2016 peer group, potential economic value realized, timing of vesting and taxation. Along with a review of 2016 Peer Group long-term incentive award practices, the Committee considers the retentive value of the unvested equity awards held by each executive officer to determine whether additional awards to secure continued employment with the Company are warranted. For named executive officers other than the CEO, the Committee also considers the CEOs recommendations.
2016 Long-Term Incentive Opportunities and Awards
The Committee annually reviews the weighting and components of our LTI plans. The structure currently in place provides for an equal weighting of awards between performance-based (LTIP) and time-based awards (RSUs and stock options) for Mr. Merlo and the other NEOs.
As in the past, each of our performance- and equity-based long-term incentives will continue to be earned independently, meaning that successful achievement of any of the financial goals established for any of the LTI plans will not trigger or accelerate vesting of the RSU or stock option grants; similarly, any awards payable under the LTIP will be based solely on results as measured against the relevant performance metric and will not be affected by any value realized by the RSU or stock option grants. This approach supports a continuing focus on the creation of long-term shareholder value and promotes retention.
Long-Term Incentive Target Mix (%) |
|||||
CEO and All Other Named Executive Officers |
|||||
Options
25% |
RSUs
25% |
LTIP - Paid in
Shares
50% |
|||
50 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
Equity Awards - Option and RSU Grants
Equity grants are made on a predetermined date consistent with the Committees equity grant practices. For 2016, the grant date was April 1, the first business day of the second quarter. The full grant date fair value of stock options and RSUs granted to each named executive officer during fiscal 2016 is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57. Options have a term of seven years and typically vest in four equal annual installments. The annual RSU grants to our named executive officers vest in two equal installments: 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date and 50% on the fifth anniversary of the grant date.
In determining the amount of individual awards, the Committee considers the competitive benchmarking data described above as well as an executives individual performance during the immediately preceding year, potential future contributions, his or her prior years award value, and retention considerations. Options and RSU grants may also reflect changes in role or responsibilities. In the past, the Committee has made limited use of special awards.
2016 Stock Option and RSU Grant Decisions
The following table sets out the aggregate value of stock options and RSUs granted on April 1, 2016. Each named executive officer received a grant at or above their target based on their individual performance in 2015 and the performance of the Company. In the case of Mr. Roberts, the award also reflects the Committees desire to specifically retain Mr. Roberts for a minimum of three years. During 2015, the Company achieved superior financial results and completed the acquisition of Omnicare, Inc. as well as the pharmacies and clinics of Target Corporation. Additional information about the 2016 awards to each of our named executive officers, including stock option exercise price and the number of shares subject to each award, is shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 59. Additional information about the 2015 performance of each named executive officer can be found in our 2016 Proxy Statement.
EXECUTIVE NAME |
2016
AGGREGATE
EQUITY AWARD VALUE |
Larry J. Merlo | $8,000,000 |
David M. Denton | $2,000,000 |
Helena B. Foulkes | $2,000,000 |
Jonathan C. Roberts | $4,500,000 |
Thomas M. Moriarty | $2,000,000 |
PERFORMANCE-BASED LONG-TERM INCENTIVES
2014-2016 LTIP Awards
All of the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table earned payments in 2016 for awards granted in 2014 for the 2014-2016 LTIP performance period. The Committee set the 2014-2016 LTIP Return on Net Assets (RoNA) goal in 2014 to be aligned with the Companys long-term steady state targets communicated to investors in 2013 and at a level expected to generate strong operational execution and asset management. Based on strong performance against the RoNA metric throughout the three year cycle, actual RoNA (40.56%) exceeded the goal by 730 basis points and earned a maximum payout on this metric. The strong performance of RoNA closely correlates to the Companys strong cash flow and is the result of our ongoing focus on working capital. As a discussion point during our outreach in 2016, we specifically reviewed the LTIP performance metrics with our top stockholders and received positive feedback regarding the alignment with the Companys long-term strategy. As a result of similar conversations in 2015, awards beginning with the 2016-2018 cycle will be paid 100% in shares of common stock subject to a two-year holding requirement (net of taxes).
The Companys RoNA performance has improved steadily since the Committee incorporated RoNA as a performance metric for the LTIP. Below is a summary of performance over the past three cycles.
RoNA Result for LTIP Performance Cycles | ||
|
The following table sets forth threshold, target and maximum goals, the range of potential payouts as a percent of target and the actual results for the 2014-2016 performance period. The payout of the LTIP award is formulaic, though under the terms of the 2010 ICP the Committee has discretion to reduce the awards. Based on the strong performance throughout the 2014-2016 performance cycle, the Committee did not exercise any discretion with respect to the awards.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
51 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
% OF
RoNA
TARGET |
PAYOUT LEVEL AS A
% OF TARGET |
|
Threshold (minimum level of performance) | 96.2% | 40% |
Target (33.26%) | 100.0% | 100% |
Maximum | 106.5% | 200% |
Actual (40.56%) | 122% | 200% |
TSR Modifier 1.0 (reflecting 35 th percentile) | 200% |
2014 2016 LTI PLAN OPPORTUNITIES AND ACTUAL AWARD PAYMENTS |
EXECUTIVE NAME |
MINIMUM
AWARD (% OF TARGET) |
THRESHOLD
|
TARGET
AWARD (% OF TARGET) |
MAXIMUM
AWARD (% OF TARGET) |
MAXIMUM
AWARD AFTER TSR MODIFIER (% OF TARGET) |
ACTUAL
TOTAL AWARD AT 200% |
ACTUAL
CASH PORTION OF AWARD ($) |
ACTUAL
STOCK PORTION OF AWARD (# OF SHARES) |
Larry J. Merlo | 0% | 40% | 100% | 200% | 250% | $11,000,000 | $5,500,000 | 68,255 |
David M. Denton | 0% | 40% | 100% | 200% | 250% | $3,000,000 | $1,500,000 | 18,615 |
Helena B. Foulkes | 0% | 40% | 100% | 200% | 250% | $2,500,000 | $1,250,000 | 15,512 |
Jonathan C. Roberts | 0% | 40% | 100% | 200% | 250% | $3,500,000 | $1,750,000 | 21,717 |
Thomas M. Moriarty | 0% | 40% | 100% | 200% | 250% | $2,500,000 | $1,250,000 | 15,512 |
2016-2018 Performance Period Target Awards Decisions
The LTIP focuses on sustainable financial progress and optimal use of the Companys assets to improve our working capital and free cash flow. If earned, the awards below will be paid in stock in 2019 subject to a two-year holding requirement following certification of the financial performance by the Committee. The awards are not guaranteed and can range from 0%-250% of target. Payouts are formulaic, though the Committee has discretion under the 2010 ICP to reduce awards.
EXECUTIVE NAME |
TARGET PERFORMANCE-BASED LTIP AWARD
FOR 2016-2018 PERFORMANCE PERIOD; AWARDS ARE PAID IN STOCK SUBJECT TO TWO-YEAR HOLDING REQUIREMENT |
Larry J. Merlo | $6,750,000 |
David M. Denton | $2,000,000 |
Helena B. Foulkes | $2,000,000 |
Jonathan C. Roberts | $3,000,000 |
Thomas M. Moriarty | $1,875,000 |
2017-2019 LTIP Awards
LTIP awards have formulaically determined payouts based on performance against our three-year RoNA goal modified by relative TSR (S&P 500). As a result of feedback from our stockholders, the Committee revised the TSR modifier for the cycle beginning in 2017 such that awards are adjusted if performance is above or below the 50 th percentile as shown in the chart. In addition, the modifier will be applied in quartiles as opposed to terciles to be more reflective of market practices.
|
52 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
We maintain an unfunded supplemental retirement plan (SERP), which is designed to supplement the retirement benefits of selected executive officers. The SERP is a legacy plan in which participation has decreased over the years as individuals have retired, and we have not provided SERP benefits to new participants since 2010. Mr. Merlo is the only active executive officer in the SERP. Mr. Merlo has reached the maximum amount of service under the SERP based on his more than 30 years with the Company. As a result, any increase to his benefit would be primarily as a result of performance-based bonuses. See the Pension Benefits Table on page 62 for more information.
The Company maintains medical and dental benefits, life insurance and short- and long-term disability insurance programs for all of its employees. Executive officers are eligible to participate in these programs on the same basis and with the same level of financial subsidy as our other salaried employees.
Executive officers may participate in the CVS Future Fund, which is our qualified defined contribution, or 401(k), plan. An eligible CVS Health employee may defer up to 85% of his or her total eligible compensation, defined as salary plus annual incentive, to a maximum defined by the IRS; in 2016, that maximum was $18,000 plus an additional $6,000 for those age 50 and above. After the first full year of employment, CVS Health will match the employees deferral dollar-for-dollar up to a maximum equaling 5% of total eligible compensation. CVS Healths matching cash contributions into the CVS Health Future Fund for the named executive officers who participated are a component of the All Other Compensation Table on page 58.
We offer other benefits that are available to eligible employees, including executive officers, as follows.
Deferred Compensation Plan and Deferred Stock Plan
Eligible executive officers may choose to defer earned and vested compensation into the Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP) and the Deferred Stock Compensation Plan (DSP), which are available to any U.S. employees meeting the Plans eligibility criteria. The plans are intended to provide retirement savings in a tax-efficient manner and to enhance stock ownership. The DCP offers a variety of investment crediting choices, none of which represents an above-market return. The individual contributions of each of the named executive officers during fiscal 2016 to the DCP and the DSP, including earnings on those contributions, any distributions during 2016 and total account balances as of the end of 2016, are shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 63.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
We provide the following personal benefits to our named executive officers:
● |
Financial planning: An allowance to
cover the cost of a Company-provided financial planner to assist with
personal financial and estate planning. We believe it is important to
provide to our executives the professional expertise required to ensure
that they maximize the efficiencies of our compensation and benefit
programs and are able to devote their full attention to the management of
the Company.
|
● |
Limited personal use of corporate
aircraft: We maintain corporate aircraft that may be used by our employees
to conduct Company business. Pursuant to an executive security program
established by the Board upon the Committees recommendation, the CEO is
required to use our aircraft for all travel needs, including personal
travel, in order to minimize and more efficiently use his
travel time, protect the confidentiality of his travel
and our business, and enhance his personal security. Certain other named
executive officers were also permitted to use our corporate aircraft for
personal travel on a very limited basis during fiscal
2016.
|
● |
Home security: An allowance to the named executive officers to cover the costs of the installation and maintenance of home security monitoring systems. While the Committee believes these security costs are business expenses, disclosure of these costs as personal benefits is required. |
The value of all of these items is treated as income taxable to the executives. The aggregate incremental cost to the Company of providing these personal benefits to each of the named executive officers during fiscal 2016 is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
53 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
KEY POLICIES RELATED TO COMPENSATION
Recoupment
Effective with performance cycles beginning in 2009, we have maintained a recoupment policy that applies to all annual and long-term incentive awards granted to executive officers. The policy applies in cases where financial or operational results used to determine an award amount are meaningfully altered based on fraud or material financial misconduct (collectively, Misconduct), as determined by the Board, and apply to any executive officer determined to have been involved in the Misconduct.
The policy applies to Misconduct committed during the performance period that is discovered during the performance period or the three-year period following the performance period. The policy allows us to recoup the entire award, not only excess amounts generated by the Misconduct, subject to the determination of the Board, and the policy may apply even where there is no financial restatement.
CVS Healths Anti-Gross-Up Policy
CVS Health adopted a broad policy against tax gross-ups several years ago. It is notable that when the policy was first adopted, there was an exception for gross-ups payable pursuant to pre-existing agreements. However, in 2012 our executives amended their existing employment and change in control agreements to eliminate any tax gross-ups potentially payable in connection with a change in control. This was done voluntarily, and without any payment of additional compensation. The only current exception to our anti-gross-up policy is for tax payments that may be due under our broad-based relocation policy, which is applicable to a large number of employees (i.e., those who must relocate upon hire, transfer or promotion).
Insider Trading Policy, Including Anti-Pledging and Hedging
A significant percentage of executive compensation is payable in CVS Health common stock, in the form of RSUs and stock options. The Board and executive management of CVS Health take seriously their responsibilities and obligations to exhibit the highest standards of behavior relative to selling and trading our stock. All transactions in our stock contemplated by any director, executive officer or designated employee who has a significant role in, or access to, our financial reporting process (collectively, lnsiders), must be pre-cleared by either the General Counsel or the Corporate Secretary. Insiders are generally prohibited from trading in any of our securities except during periods of varying length beginning shortly after the release of our financial results for each quarter, and Insiders and other employees may be required to refrain from trading during other designated periods when significant developments or announcements are anticipated. In addition, it is our policy that Insiders and other employees may not engage in any of the following activities with respect to our securities:
● |
Trading in our securities on a
short-term basis (stock purchased in the open market must be held for at
least six months);
|
● |
Purchasing stock on margin or
pledging our stock or any stock incentive award as collateral for a loan
or margin account;
|
● |
Engaging in short sales or purchases
of our stock;
|
● |
Buying or selling puts, calls,
exchange traded options or other derivative securities;
or
|
● |
Engaging in any other hedging transactions, which includes transactions designed to offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities. |
Our most senior executives and Board members are generally required to transact in our stock pursuant to a 10b5-1 trading plan, and our other executives are encouraged to use trading plans. A trading plan is a contract that allows the individual to sell a pre-determined number of shares at a time in the future when conditions in the plan are met. However, there are extensive guidelines that govern the use of 10b5-1 trading plans including the timing of entry or modification of a plan, the price at which shares will be traded, a cooling off period during which no trades can take place, minimum and maximum terms, restrictions on the number of plans an individual can maintain, a prohibition on trading outside of the plan, and pre-approval of plans (and any modification of plans) by the General Counsel or Corporate Secretary.
54 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
AGREEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As previously disclosed, we have an employment agreement (Employment Agreement) with Mr. Merlo and change in control agreements (CIC Agreements, and together with the Employment Agreement, the Agreements) with Messrs. Denton, Roberts and Moriarty and Ms. Foulkes.
The Committee believes that the interests of stockholders are best served by ensuring that the interests of our senior management are aligned with our stockholders. The change-incontrol provisions of the Agreements are intended to eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of senior management to pursue potential change-in-control transactions that may be in stockholders best interests. The Agreements serve to eliminate distraction caused by uncertainty about personal financial circumstances during a period in which CVS Health requires focused and thoughtful leadership to ensure a successful outcome. Accordingly, the Agreements provide certain specified double trigger severance benefits to the covered executives in the event of their termination under certain circumstances following a change in control. The Committee believes a double trigger severance benefit provision is more appropriate, as it provides an incentive for greater continuity in management following a change in control. Double trigger benefits require that two events occur in order for severance to be paid, typically a change in control followed by the executives involuntary termination of employment. The 2010 ICP was also amended in 2012 to require a double trigger equity vesting of change in control benefits.
The Committee reviews the severance benefits annually with the assistance of its compensation consultant to evaluate both their effectiveness and competitiveness. The review for fiscal 2016 found the current level of benefits to be within competitive norms for design. Details of payments made to the executives upon a change in control and various termination scenarios; provisions for the treatment of equity awards, SERP and other benefits; and estimated payments that would be made to the executives whose employment terminates following a change in control may be found in Payments/(Forfeitures) Under Termination Scenarios beginning on page 63.
COMPLIANCE WITH IRC 162(m)
IRC 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million paid to a companys chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers at year end, other than the chief financial officer. However, qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met.
The Committee considers the deductibility of executive compensation under IRC 162(m), but may authorize certain non-deductible payments in excess of $1 million. As a matter of compensation design, the Board adopted and stockholders approved the 2010 ICP, under which the Committee may grant annual equity awards, stock options and certain other LTI plan awards to senior executives, including the named executive officers. Certain of the awards granted thereunder are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation and therefore are not subject to the $1 million limitation on deductibility. Awards under the EIP, which are earned based on performance relative to predetermined financial and operating targets, are designed with the intention that amounts paid to the named executive officers will qualify as performance-based compensation and therefore be deductible by CVS Health. However, it is possible that payments under the LTI plans and/or the EIP could be non-deductible.
The Committee generally intends to design certain portions of named executive officer compensation that are over $1 million in order to qualify such compensation as performance-based compensation under IRC 162(m). The Committee believes it is important to retain flexibility to structure the Companys executive compensation program and practices in a manner that the Committee determines is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Committee retains discretion to operate the Companys executive compensation programs in a manner designed to promote varying company goals. As a result, the Committee may from time to time conclude that certain compensation arrangements are in the best interest of CVS Health and its stockholders and consistent with its compensation philosophy and strategy despite the fact that the arrangements might not qualify for tax deductibility. Elements of the executive compensation program that do not comply with the deduction rules of IRC 162(m) include base salaries above $1 million and time-vested RSU awards.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
55 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS DETAILED DISCUSSION |
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES USED IN COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we refer to various financial measures. The majority of these financial measures are calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. However, there are some financial measures that management adjusts in order to assess our year-over-year performance. These adjusted financial measures are commonly referred to as non-GAAP. An explanation of how we calculate these non-GAAP financial measures is included below.
Adjusted Income from Continuing Operations
Adjusted Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to CVS Health is defined as follows:
● |
Income before income tax
provision
|
● |
Plus (minus): Non-GAAP adjustments
not part of the underlying business
performance
|
● |
Less: Adjusted income tax provision
(using the adjusted effective tax rate, adjusted for the items
above)
|
● |
Plus (minus): Net loss (income)
attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
● |
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities |
Adjusted Operating Profit (MIP) or MIP Adjusted Operating Profit
Adjusted Operating Profit (MIP) or MIP Adjusted Operating Profit is defined as earnings before interest and taxes adjusted for certain items. For the purposes of measuring performance against established targets in any period, when applicable those excluded items comprise certain legal settlements, store rationalization impairment charges and activity related to newly acquired or divested businesses.
Free Cash Flow
We define Free Cash Flow as net cash provided by operating activities less net additions to property and equipment (i.e., additions to property and equipment plus proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions).
RoNA or Return on Net Assets
RoNA, or Return on Net Assets, is calculated by dividing adjusted net operating profit after tax (Adjusted NOPAT) by the most recent years Adjusted Average Net Assets. Adjusted NOPAT is Operating Profit adjusted for certain permitted financial adjustments after tax described below. Adjusted Average Net Assets for the purposes of this calculation is defined as current assets plus net fixed assets less accounts payable and accrued expenses. For the purposes of measuring performance against established targets in any period, Adjusted NOPAT and Adjusted Average Net Assets exclude after tax amounts related to newly acquired or divested businesses and adjustments to legal reserves in connection with certain legal settlements. Adjusted Average Net Assets also excludes cash associated with the pre-funding for the 2017 accelerated share repurchase agreement, as well as the financial impact of the change in accounting principle associated with the classification of deferred tax assets.
56 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
The following Summary Compensation Table shows information about the compensation received by our CEO, CFO and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers for services rendered in all capacities during the 2016 fiscal year.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
NAME &
PRINCIPAL
2016 POSITIONS 1 |
YEAR |
SALARY
($) |
BONUS
($) |
STOCK
AWARDS ($) 2 3 4 |
OPTION
AWARDS ($) 3 |
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN COMPENSATION ($) 5 |
CHANGE
IN
PENSION VALUE AND NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION EARNINGS ($) 6 |
ALL
|
TOTAL
($) |
Larry
J. Merlo
President and Chief Executive Officer |
2016 | 1,630,000 | | 3,999,931 | 3,999,990 | 7,882,000 | | 847,456 | 18,359,377 |
2015 | 1,560,000 | | 6,749,900 | 3,999,993 | 9,692,596 | 6,087,680 | 852,885 | 28,943,054 | |
2014 | 1,350,000 | | 6,749,996 | 3,999,998 | 11,465,052 | 8,065,273 | 720,414 | 32,350,733 | |
David
M. Denton
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
2016 | 850,000 | | 999,983 | 999,987 | 2,380,000 | | 319,026 | 5,548,996 |
2015 | 843,750 | | 1,874,937 | 874,999 | 3,077,597 | | 289,298 | 6,960,581 | |
2014 | 825,000 | | 8,928,958 | 749,997 | 3,975,043 | | 205,582 | 14,684,580 | |
Helena B. Foulkes
Executive Vice President and President CVS Pharmacy |
2016 | 950,000 | | 999,983 | 999,987 | 2,002,000 | | 210,213 | 5,162,183 |
2015 | 925,000 | | 1,749,937 | 874,999 | 2,283,078 | | 232,314 | 6,065,328 | |
2014 | 850,000 | | 1,249,927 | 624,992 | 3,165,044 | | 174,119 | 6,064,082 | |
Jonathan C. Roberts
Executive Vice President and President CVS Caremark |
2016 | 950,000 | | 2,249,961 | 2,249,999 | 2,907,000 | | 274,147 | 8,631,107 |
2015 | 937,500 | | 2,124,898 | 999,995 | 3,397,597 | | 280,559 | 7,740,549 | |
2014 | 900,000 | | 1,749,988 | 874,991 | 3,915,058 | | 246,386 | 7,686,423 | |
Thomas M. Moriarty
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel |
2016 | 750,000 | | 999,983 | 999,987 | 2,026,000 | | 174,770 | 4,950,740 |
2015 | 730,000 | | 1,624,975 | 749,989 | 2,656,298 | | 163,131 | 5,924,393 | |
2014 | 670,000 | | 1,374,958 | 749,997 | 2,412,573 | | 208,194 | 5,415,722 | |
|
1 | On March 2, 2017, the Company announced that Mr. Roberts was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Mr. Moriarty was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Policy and External Affairs Officer and General Counsel. For purposes of 2016 disclosure, this proxy statement reflects each executives title as of December 31, 2016. |
2 | Included in the stock award column is the full grant date fair value of all RSU awards made to the executive in 2016. |
3 | The figures shown are the full fair value on the date of grant. For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to value the stock and option awards, please see the discussion of stock awards and option awards contained in our 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements at Note 9, Stock Incentive Plans. |
4 | The amounts reported for years 2014 and 2015 include 50% of the value of the LTIP award granted in that year, representing the portion to be settled in stock at target value. As discussed on page 46, in response to stockholder feedback, beginning with the 2016-2018 performance cycle LTIP awards will be denominated in cash and settled 100% in stock (rather than cash and stock). As a result and consistent with SEC reporting rules, the LTIP award will be reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the year it vests, not the year of grant. If these changes had not been made to the LTIP design, the following additional amounts would have been reported in 2016: Mr. Merlo $3,375,000; Mr. Denton $1,000,000; Ms. Foulkes $1,000,000; Mr. Roberts $1,500,000; and Mr. Moriarty $937,500. |
5 | The figures shown include amounts earned in 2016 as annual cash incentive awards (see page 49) and the cash portion of the 2014 2016 LTIP cycle (see page 52). Beginning with the 2016-2018 performance cycle, LTIP awards will be settled in stock and reported for the final year of the cycle. Awards will be reported in this column because they are denominated in cash and then paid in common stock subject to a two-year holding requirement. |
6 | The amounts reported in this column represent only changes in pension value, as the Company does not pay above-market earnings on deferred compensation. The value of Mr. Merlos pension benefit decreased by $669,139 in 2016 from the prior years valuation; however, under SEC rules the negative change in the pension value is disclosed as $0. The Company adopted a policy in 2010 stating that it will not offer SERP benefits to new participants. Mr. Merlo is the only executive participant in the SERP. For additional information on the SERP, see Pension Benefits beginning on page 61. |
7 | Set forth below is additional information regarding the amounts disclosed in the All Other Compensation column for 2016. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
57 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
ALL OTHER COMPENSATION 2016 |
COMPANY | |||
CONTRIBUTIONS | |||
PERQUISITES & | TO DEFINED | ||
OTHER PERSONAL | CONTRIBUTION | ||
BENEFITS A | PLANS B | OTHER C | |
NAME & PRINCIPAL 2016 POSITIONS | ($) | ($) | ($) |
Larry J. Merlo | 66,737 | 267,750 | 512,969 |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
David M. Denton | 17,377 | 24,000 | 277,649 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
Helena B. Foulkes | 21,341 | 118,250 | 70,622 |
Executive Vice President and President CVS Pharmacy | |||
Jonathan C. Roberts | 25,813 | 136,000 | 112,334 |
Executive Vice President and President CVS Caremark | |||
Thomas M. Moriarty | 18,299 | 102,500 | 53,971 |
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel |
A | The amounts above reflect the following: for Mr. Merlo, $13,840 for financial planning services, $564 for home security, $47,084 associated with personal use of company aircraft and $5,249 associated with the CVS Health Charity Classic; for Mr. Denton, $15,000 for financial planning services, $180 for home security, and $2,197 associated with personal use of company aircraft; for Ms. Foulkes, $15,000 for financial planning services, $1,092 for home security and $5,249 associated with the CVS Health Charity Classic; for Mr. Roberts, $15,000 for financial planning services, $292 for home security, $5,272 associated with personal use of company aircraft and $5,249 associated with the CVS Health Charity Classic; for Mr. Moriarty, $15,000 for financial planning services and $3,299 associated with the CVS Health Charity Classic. The Company determines the amount associated with personal use of Company aircraft by calculating the incremental cost to the Company based on the cost of fuel, trip-related maintenance, deadhead flights, crew travel expenses, landing fees, trip-related hangar costs and smaller variable expenses. |
B | For 2016, this amount includes Company matching contributions to the CVS Health Future Fund of $13,250 for each of Messrs. Merlo, Denton, Roberts and Moriarty and Ms. Foulkes. It also includes Company matching contributions credited to notional accounts in the unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan equal to: for Mr. Merlo $254,500; for Mr. Denton, $10,750; for Ms. Foulkes, $105,000; for Mr. Roberts, $122,750; and for Mr. Moriarty, $89,250. |
C | This amount includes cash dividend equivalents paid by the Company on unvested RSUs as follows: for Mr. Merlo, $369,023; for Mr. Denton, $277,649; for Ms. Foulkes, $70,622; for Mr. Roberts, $102,430; and for Mr. Moriarty, $53,971. Also includes cash dividend equivalents paid by the Company on deferred RSUs, as noted in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table, equal to: for Mr. Merlo, $143,946; and for Mr. Roberts, $9,904. |
58 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS |
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS |
This table reflects awards granted under our annual cash incentive plan for 2016, the 2016 2018 LTIP cycle, and the annual equity awards for 2016, which include stock options and RSUs.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS 2016 |
1 | Represents the value, denominated in cash, at grant. Beginning with the 2016-2018 LTIP cycle, awards will be settled 100% in CVS Health common stock adjusted for performance. At the end of the three year cycle, final awards will be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table under the column Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation . Prior to the 2016-2018 LTIP cycle, awards were settled in equal portions of stock and cash and reported in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table and the Summary Compensation Table, respectively. |
2 | Represents the threshold achievement in order to receive a payout under the respective plan; performance below threshold results in no payout. |
The stock option awards shown above vest in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant and expire seven years from the date of grant. As described above, our policy is to establish the exercise price for stock options as the closing sale price of our common stock on the grant date. Annual RSU grants typically vest in increments of 50% on the third anniversary of the date of grant and 50% on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
59 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END |
This table reflects stock option and RSU awards granted to our named executive officers under our 1997 and 2010 ICPs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2016.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2016 YEAR-END |
1 | The value of the RSUs is based on $78.91, which was the closing sale price of our stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of our fiscal year. |
2 | The stock options vest in one-third increments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. |
3 | The stock options vest in one-quarter increments on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. |
4 | The stock options vest in one-third increments on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. |
5 | RSUs vest in increments of 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date and on the fifth anniversary of the grant date. |
6 | RSUs vest on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. |
7 | RSUs vest on the executives 55th birthday. |
8 | RSUs vest on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. |
9 | Represents share portion of the LTIP 2015-2017 cycle, assuming target performance is achieved. For additional information regarding the disclosure of LTIP cycles beginning in 2016, see the CD&A section and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. |
60 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED |
The table below reflects information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 concerning options exercised and the vesting of previously granted RSUs and non-transferable shares for each of the named executive officers. The value of the shares acquired upon exercise of the options and the shares represented by the vesting of RSUs is based on the closing sale price of our stock on the date of exercise and the date of vesting, respectively.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED 2016 |
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | ||||||
NAME & PRINCIPAL 2016 POSITIONS |
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE (#) |
VALUE
REALIZED ON EXERCISE ($) |
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED ON VESTING (#) 1 |
VALUE
REALIZED ON VESTING ($) 2 |
|||
Larry J. Merlo | 169,280 | 11,329,316 | 137,112 | 12,717,579 | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
David M. Denton | | | 45,526 | 4,320,808 | |||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
Helena B. Foulkes | | | 30,824 | 2,889,009 | |||
Executive Vice President and President CVS Pharmacy | |||||||
Jonathan C. Roberts | | | 41,182 | 3,790,277 | |||
Executive Vice President and President CVS Caremark | |||||||
Thomas M. Moriarty | | | 21,243 | 1,850,680 | |||
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel |
1 | Includes RSUs vested during 2016 and the share portion of the 2014-2016 LTIP cycle issued in early 2017. |
2 | Includes the RSU value deferred during 2016, which is also shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table: for Mr. Merlo $3,373,108; for Ms. Foulkes, $1,158,453; and for Mr. Roberts, $2,040,321. |
PENSION BENEFITS |
We maintain an unfunded supplemental retirement plan (SERP), which is designed to supplement the retirement benefits of select executives in lieu of a qualified defined benefit plan. The SERP is a legacy plan in which participation has decreased over the years as participants have retired, and the Company has not provided SERP benefits to new participants since 2010. Mr. Merlo is the only active executive officer participating in the SERP.
Under the SERPs benefit formula, participants (including Mr. Merlo and certain retired executives) will receive an annual benefit commencing on the later of age 55 or retirement, equal to 1.6% of a three-year average of final compensation (as defined in the SERP) for each year of service up to 30 years, with no offset for any amounts provided by our qualified plans, Social Security or other retirement benefits. Final compensation for purposes of the SERP benefit formula is the average of the executives three highest years of annual salary and annual cash bonus during the last ten years of service. The estimated credited years of benefit service for Mr. Merlo as of the measurement date of December 31, 2016 was 30 years (Mr. Merlos years of service are capped at 30, in accordance with the terms of the SERP). Benefits under the SERP formula are payable in annual installments for the life of the executive, unless the executive has made an advance election in accordance with plan and IRS rules to have the benefit paid in the form of a lump sum or joint and survivor annuity of equivalent actuarial value. Mr. Merlo has made an election to receive his entire benefit payable on account of termination of employment in the form of a lump sum.
No benefits are payable to an eligible executive until he terminates employment. As of the measurement date, Mr. Merlo was eligible for an immediate benefit.
As Mr. Merlo has reached the maximum amount of service under the SERP based on his more than 30 years with the Company, any benefit increases are primarily as a result of performance-based bonuses. In addition, because the SERP is a defined benefit plan, it is subject to certain actuarial variations including discount rates and mortality table assumptions. As a result, Mr. Merlos benefit decreased by $669,139 during 2016.
The accumulated value in the Pension Benefits Table and Summary Compensation Table is based on the benefit accrued as of the measurement date payable as a lump sum commencing on the earliest unreduced retirement age (55) using assumptions which include a 2.50% discount rate as of December 31, 2016. Mr. Merlo is fully vested in his accrued benefit. For further information regarding pension assumptions, please see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
61 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: PENSION BENEFITS |
PENSION BENEFITS 2016 |
NAME & PRINCIPAL 2016 POSITIONS |
PLAN
NAME |
NUMBER
OF
YEARS OF CREDITED SERVICE (#) |
PRESENT
VALUE OF ACCUMULATED BENEFIT ($) |
PAYMENTS
DURING LAST FISCAL YEAR ($) |
Larry J. Merlo | SERP | 30 | 43,743,846 | |
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
David M. Denton | N/A | | | |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Helena B. Foulkes | N/A | | | |
Executive Vice President and President CVS Pharmacy | ||||
Jonathan C. Roberts | N/A | | | |
Executive Vice President and President CVS Caremark | ||||
Thomas M. Moriarty | N/A | | | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel |
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION |
Executive officers and selected members of senior management may participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP) and the Deferred Stock Plan (DSP). The DCP allows participants to defer payment of a portion of their salary and all or a portion of their annual cash incentive (and in the case of executive officers, all or a portion of any LTI plan cash award) to facilitate their personal retirement or financial planning. For participants in the DCP, we provide a maximum match of up to 5% of the salary and annual cash incentive deferred, plus an additional match for matching contributions only on amounts that cannot be deferred into qualified 401(k) plans due to IRS plan limits.
The investment crediting options for the DCP mirror those offered for the CVS Health Future Fund, which is the Companys 401(k) plan. Each year, the amount of a participants deferred compensation account increases or decreases based on the appreciation and/or depreciation in the value of the investment crediting alternatives selected by the participant. There are no vesting requirements on deferred compensation accounts.
Executive officers and selected members of management are eligible to participate in the DSP, in which they may elect to defer settlement of RSUs beyond the scheduled vesting date. Dividend equivalents are reinvested during the deferral period. Messrs. Merlo, Roberts and Moriarty deferred portions of their equity-based compensation in the DSP. Executive officers are not permitted to defer proceeds of stock option exercises.
The amounts shown in the table below for Cash and Stock were deferred pursuant to the DCP and the DSP, respectively.
62 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: PAYMENTS/(FORFEITURES) UNDER TERMINATION SCENARIOS |
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION 2016 |
NAME & PRINCIPAL
2016 POSITIONS |
TYPE |
EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS IN LAST FY ($) 1 |
REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS IN LAST FY ($) 2 |
AGGREGATE
EARNINGS IN LAST FY ($) 3 |
AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/ DISTRIBUTIONS ($) 4 |
AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT LAST FYE ($) 5 |
|
Larry J. Merlo
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Cash | 267,750 | 254,500 | 124,118 | | 5,028,127 | |
Stock | 3,373,108 | | (16,658,886 | ) | 143,946 | 75,813,116 | |
David M. Denton
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Cash | | 10,750 | 661 | | 25,927 | |
Stock | | | | | | ||
Helena B. Foulkes
Executive Vice President and President CVS Pharmacy |
Cash | 118,250 | 105,000 | 91,526 | | 1,947,330 | |
Stock | 1,158,453 | | (694,574 | ) | 232,631 | 2,812,226 | |
Jonathan C. Roberts
Executive Vice President and President CVS Caremark |
Cash | 1,899,597 | 122,750 | 353,192 | | 5,609,076 | |
Stock | 3,667,724 | | (2,073,561 | ) | 9,904 | 8,917,542 | |
Thomas M. Moriarty
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel |
Cash | 1,300,000 | 89,250 | 444,772 | | 5,565,717 | |
Stock | | | (118,929 | ) | | 549,473 | |
1 | The cash contributions include amounts shown for 2016 in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table as follows: for Mr. Merlo, $81,500; for Ms. Foulkes, $47,500; and for Mr. Roberts, $95,000. All other amounts represent non-equity incentive compensation deferred during 2016. The stock contributions for Messrs. Merlo and Roberts and Ms. Foulkes represent deferred settlement under the DSP of RSUs granted in prior years that vested in 2016. The stock contribution for Mr. Roberts includes the deferred settlement under the DSP of shares granted under the LTIP for the 2013-2015 cycle that were credited to his account in 2016. |
2 | All amounts shown are also disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation and reflect amounts credited and/or earned in 2016. |
3 | All earnings shown on the Stock line are attributable to dividend equivalents credited as additional deferred RSUs and an increase in our common stock price. |
4 | All amounts distributed from the DSP include cash dividend equivalent payments. |
5 | The following amounts included in this column have been previously reported in the Summary Compensation Tables of our annual proxy statements since 2007: |
CASH | STOCK | |
Mr. Merlo | $3,292,173 | $19,486,349 |
Mr. Denton | 31,675 | |
Ms. Foulkes | 689,301 | |
Mr. Roberts | 2,224,678 | |
Mr. Moriarty | 3,172,750 | |
PAYMENTS/(FORFEITURES) UNDER TERMINATION SCENARIOS |
The tables below show the amounts that would be received or forfeited by each named executive officer under various termination scenarios, assuming (1) that the termination occurred on December 31, 2016 and (2) that amounts that have been paid or are payable in all events, such as the non-equity incentive amounts earned with respect to fiscal year 2016 and disclosed in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 57, the amounts payable under the pension plans discussed beginning on page 61, and the amounts in the nonqualified deferred compensation plans discussed beginning on page 62, are not included in the tables below, nor is any amount for stock options that are vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2016.
With respect to the tables below:
● |
Messrs. Denton and Moriarty
and Ms. Foulkes were not eligible for retirement benefits as of December
31, 2016.
|
● | The amounts paid as base salary upon voluntary termination for Mr. Merlo reflects the Companys option to continue to pay 50% of his salary for 18 months in consideration for compliance with a non-competition provision. |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
63 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: PAYMENTS/(FORFEITURES) UNDER TERMINATION SCENARIOS |
● | The option value is determined by multiplying the number of unvested options outstanding as of December 31, 2016 by the difference between the exercise price and $78.91, the closing sale price on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the Companys fiscal year. Generally, the option grant agreements provide for the following post-termination exercise periods, but in no case will the post-termination exercise period be longer than the original option term: |
● |
In the case of termination due to
death, during the one-year period following
termination;
|
● |
In the case of constructive
termination without cause prior to a change in control of the Company
(CIC), during the severance period;
|
● |
In the case of constructive
termination without cause after a CIC, during the remainder of the option
term; and
|
● |
In the cases of termination for
cause or voluntary termination, generally there is no post-termination
exercise period.
|
● |
The value of the RSUs is determined
by multiplying the number of RSUs as of December 31, 2016 by $78.91, the
closing sale price on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of our
fiscal year.
|
● |
Upon a CIC and subsequent
termination of employment, all outstanding unvested stock options will
vest in full and restrictions will lapse on all
RSUs.
|
● |
The value of LTIP cycles assumes that pro-rated payments are made for the outstanding 2015 2017 LTIP cycle (two-thirds) and 2016 2018 LTIP cycle (one-third); all outstanding performance cycles are assumed to be achieved at target and the value of prorated payments are made at target. |
In the event of his covered termination prior to a CIC, Mr. Merlo would receive a cash severance payment equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and his then-current annual cash incentive at target. In the event of a covered termination following a CIC, Mr. Merlo would receive a cash severance payment equal to three times the sum of his annual base salary and his then-current annual cash incentive at target, but under his amended employment contract such cash severance would be reduced to avoid the excise tax under IRC Section 280G if that would give Mr. Merlo a better after-tax result. Early retirement is defined in Mr. Merlos Employment Agreement and in his various stock option and RSU agreements. See Agreements with Executive Officers on page 55 for additional information.
LARRY J.
MERLO
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
DEATH
($) |
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE ($) |
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE PRIOR TO CIC ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE AFTER CIC ($) |
APPROVED
EARLY RETIREMENT ($) |
Cash Severance Value | ||||||
Base Salary | | | 1,222,500 | 3,260,000 | 4,890,000 | |
Bonus | | | | 6,520,000 | 9,780,000 | |
Immediate Vesting of Equity | ||||||
Value of Options | 2,693,657 | (2,693,657) | (2,693,657) | 2,693,657 | 2,693,657 | 2,693,657 |
Value of RSUs | 16,523,597 | (16,523,597) | (16,523,597) | 16,523,597 | 16,523,597 | 11,737,152 |
Value of LTIP Cycles | 5,916,667 | (5,916,667) | (5,916,667) | 5,916,667 | 12,250,000 | 5,916,667 |
Benefits and Other | ||||||
Health Insurance | | | | 26,826 | 40,240 | |
SERP | | | | | | |
Excise Tax Gross-Up | | | | | | |
Total | 25,133,921 | (25,133,921 ) | (23,911,421 ) | 34,940,747 | 46,177,494 | 20,347,476 |
With respect to each of the remaining named executive officers, in the event of his or her termination without cause or constructive termination prior to a CIC, pursuant to a restrictive covenant agreement and the Companys Severance Plan for Non-Store Employees, the named executive officer is eligible for severance payments, provided that he or she executes a separation agreement with the Company that includes, among other things, standard restrictive covenants regarding non-competition and non-solicitation of customers and employees. In the event the named executive officer is terminated by the Company without cause or experiences a constructive termination prior to a CIC, he or she is eligible to receive up to 18 months of base salary as severance, paid in equal monthly installments, in consideration for a general release of claims and compliance with various restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation provisions. Each of the remaining named executive officers has entered into a CIC Agreement with the Company that specifies payments that would be made to him or her in the event of a CIC. In the event of a covered termination, the named executive officer
64 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: PAYMENTS/(FORFEITURES) UNDER TERMINATION SCENARIOS |
would receive a cash severance payment equal to one and one-half times the sum of annual base salary and then-current annual cash incentive at target, full value at target achievement level for the 2015-2017 LTIP and 2016-2018 LTIP cycles, and immediate vesting of stock options and RSUs. Under the amended CIC Agreement such cash severance would be reduced to avoid the excise tax under IRC Section 280G if that would give the named executive officer a better after-tax result. Tables for each of the remaining named executive officers are set forth below.
DAVID M.
DENTON
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
DEATH
($) |
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE ($) |
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE PRIOR TO CIC ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE AFTER CIC ($) |
Cash Severance Value | |||||
Base Salary | | | | 1,275,000 | 1,275,000 |
Bonus | | | | | 1,912,500 |
Immediate Vesting of Equity | |||||
Value of Options | 804,782 | (804,782) | (804,782) | 804,782 | 804,782 |
Value of RSUs | 12,545,112 | (12,545,112) | (12,545,112) | 2,825,057 | 12,545,112 |
Value of LTIP Cycles | 2,000,000 | (2,000,000) | (2,000,000) | 2,000,000 | 4,000,000 |
Benefits and Other | |||||
Health Insurance | | | | 21,178 | 21,178 |
SERP | | | | | |
Excise Tax Gross-Up | | | | | |
Total | 15,349,894 | (15,349,894) | (15,349,894) | 6,926,017 | 20,558,572 |
HELENA B.
FOULKES
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT CVS PHARMACY |
DEATH
($) |
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE ($) |
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE PRIOR TO CIC ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE AFTER CIC ($) |
Cash Severance Value | |||||
Base Salary | | | | 1,425,000 | 1,425,000 |
Bonus | | | | | 2,137,500 |
Immediate Vesting of Equity | |||||
Value of Options | 360,941 | (360,941) | (360,941) | 360,941 | 360,941 |
Value of RSUs | 3,248,883 | (3,248,883) | (3,248,883) | 1,425,272 | 3,248,883 |
Value of LTIP Cycles | 1,833,333 | (1,833,333) | (1,833,333) | 1,833,333 | 3,750,000 |
Benefits and Other | |||||
Health Insurance | | | | 21,326 | 21,326 |
SERP | | | | | |
Excise Tax Gross-Up | | | | | |
Total | 5,443,157 | (5,443,157) | (5,443,157) | 5,065,872 | 10,943,650 |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
65 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES: PAYMENTS/(FORFEITURES) UNDER TERMINATION SCENARIOS |
JONATHAN C.
ROBERTS
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT CVS CAREMARK |
DEATH
($) |
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE ($) |
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE PRIOR TO CIC ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE AFTER CIC ($) |
APPROVED
RETIREMENT ($) |
Cash Severance Value | ||||||
Base Salary | | | | 1,425,000 | 1,425,000 | |
Bonus | | | | | 2,137,500 | |
Immediate Vesting of Equity | ||||||
Value of Options | 1,786,081 | (1,786,081) | (1,786,081) | 1,786,081 | 1,786,081 | 1,786,081 |
Value of RSUs | 5,711,332 | (5,711,332) | (5,711,332) | 3,173,208 | 5,711,332 | 4,236,599 |
Value of LTIP Cycles | 2,500,000 | (2,500,000) | (2,500,000) | 2,500,000 | 5,250,000 | 4,500,000 |
Benefits and Other | ||||||
Health Insurance | | | | 21,326 | 21,326 | |
SERP | | | | | | |
Excise Tax Gross-Up | | | | | | |
Total | 9,997,413 | (9,997,413) | (9,997,413) | 8,905,615 | 16,331,239 | 10,522,680 |
THOMAS M.
MORIARTY
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER AND GENERAL COUNSEL |
DEATH
($) |
TERMINATION
FOR CAUSE ($) |
VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE PRIOR TO CIC ($) |
TERMINATION
W/O CAUSE OR CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION W/O CAUSE AFTER CIC ($) |
Cash Severance Value | |||||
Base Salary | | | | 1,125,000 | 1,125,000 |
Bonus | | | | | 1,687,500 |
Immediate Vesting of Equity | |||||
Value of Options | 1,066,470 | (1,066,470) | (1,066,470) | 1,066,470 | 1,066,470 |
Value of RSUs | 3,099,721 | (3,099,721) | (3,099,721) | 1,662,713 | 3,099,721 |
Value of LTIP Cycles | 1,791,667 | (1,791,667) | (1,791,667) | 1,791,667 | 3,625,000 |
Benefits and Other | |||||
Health Insurance | | | | 19,757 | 19,757 |
SERP | | | | | |
Excise Tax Gross-Up | | | | | |
Total | 5,957,858 | (5,957,858) | (5,957,858) | 5,665,607 | 10,623,448 |
66 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
ITEM 5: 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
ITEM 5: PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPANYS 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
In May 2010, our stockholders approved our 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (2010 Plan). Assuming current grant rates, we believe that the shares currently available for issuance under the 2010 Plan would be sufficient for awards that the Company plans to grant in 2017, but may not be sufficient for awards to be granted in 2018. We are therefore requesting that our stockholders approve a new 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (2017 Plan) in order to permit the Company to continue to grant awards. We are seeking an additional 21 million shares for future grants.
On March 2, 2017 the Board adopted the 2017 Plan and is recommending it for your approval at this years annual meeting of stockholders. If approved the 2017 Plan will be the only compensation plan under which the Company grants stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based awards (Awards) to its employees. These awards have enabled and will continue to enable CVS Health to attract and retain key employees and enable those employees to acquire and/or increase their proprietary interest in CVS Health, thereby aligning their interests with the interests of CVS Healths stockholders.
In the event this proposal is approved by our stockholders, the shares that then remain available for issuance under the 2010 Plan will be transferred to the 2017 Plan and no further awards will be made under the 2010 Plan. As of March 14, 2017, the closing sale price of CVS Healths common stock on the NYSE was $79.89. If the 2017 Plan is not approved by stockholders, the 2010 Plan will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Significant Historical Award Information. The following table provides information regarding the grant of equity awards under our 2010 Plan over the past three completed fiscal years:
KEY EQUITY METRICS | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
Percentage of equity awards granted to NEOs (1) | 13.7% | 10.9% | 12.4% |
Equity burn rate (2) | 0.59% | 0.57% | 0.62% |
Dilution (3)(5) | 4.3% | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Overhang (4)(5) | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.9% |
1 | Percentage of equity awards granted to individuals who were named executive officers in the relevant year is calculated by dividing the number of shares that were issuable pursuant to equity awards that were granted to NEOs during the year by the number of shares issuable pursuant to all equity awards granted during the year. |
2 | Equity burn rate is calculated by dividing the number of shares issuable pursuant to equity awards granted during the year by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, as disclosed in our Form 10-K. |
3 | Dilution is calculated by dividing the sum of (x) the number of shares issuable pursuant to equity awards outstanding at the end of the fiscal year and (y) the number of shares available under the 2010 Plan for future grants, by the number of shares outstanding at the end of the year. |
4 | Overhang is calculated by dividing the number of shares issuable pursuant to equity awards outstanding at the end of the year by the number of shares outstanding at the end of the year. |
5 | The Company repurchased approximately 47.5 million shares during 2016. If the Company had not repurchased these shares, approximately 1.12 billion shares would have been outstanding at the end of 2016, and dilution and overhang would have been 4.1% and 2.5%, respectively, for 2016. |
The following table summarizes information about the Companys common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016.
Number
of
securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (1) |
Weighted
average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities
remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in first column) (1) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | 23,275 | $68.60 | 17,645 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | | |
Total | 23,275 | $68.60 | 17,645 |
1 Shares in thousands.
2017 Plan Features. The following is a brief description of the material features of the 2017 Plan. The full text of the 2017 Plan is set forth in Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement and the description set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit A .
HIGHLIGHTING IMPORTANT POLICIES THAT WILL APPLY TO THE 2017 PLAN |
HIGHLIGHTING IMPORTANT PROVISIONS OF THE 2017 PLAN |
||
✓ |
Performance Measures Aligned with Stockholder Interests |
✓ | Broad-based Plan that Benefits a Range of Employees |
✓ |
Stock Ownership Guidelines |
✓ |
Minimum Three-year Vesting of Time-based Awards |
✓ |
LTI Plan Share Award Retention |
✓ |
Minimum One-year Vesting of Performance-based Awards |
✓ |
Broad Anti-Pledging and Hedging Policies |
✓ |
No Option or SAR Repricing or Cash Buyouts |
✓ |
Recoupment Policy for Clawback of Awards |
✓ |
No Discounted Options or SARs May be Granted |
✓ |
Double Trigger Vesting Upon a Change in Control |
✓ |
No Liberal Change in Control Provision |
✓ |
No Payment of Dividends on Unvested Awards |
✓ |
No Liberal Share Counting or Recycling of Shares |
✓ |
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups |
✓ |
Limitations on Awards to Non-Employee Directors |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
67 |
ITEM 5: 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
Shares Subject to the 2017 Plan. Under the 2017 Plan, 21 million shares of CVS Health common stock would be reserved and available for delivery to participants in connection with Awards, plus the number of shares remaining available for issuance under the 2010 Plan at the time it is terminated. As of March 14, 2017, there were approximately 17 million shares available for grants under the 2010 Plan. The Company anticipates utilizing approximately seven million of those shares for its annual grants to be made in April 2017. Therefore, at the time of the 2017 Annual Meeting, the 2010 Plan will have approximately 10 million shares remaining and, upon approval, the 2017 Plan will have a total of 31 million shares available for issuance. We anticipate that number of shares will be sufficient for approximately four years of grants, based on current grant practices and share price.
No Liberal Share Counting. The 2017 Plan includes provisions that prohibit liberal share counting or recycling. For purposes of determining the number of shares of stock that remain available for issuance under the 2017 Plan, the number of shares corresponding to Awards that are forfeited or cancelled or otherwise expire for any reason without having been exercised or settled, or that are settled through the issuance of consideration other than shares of stock (including, without limitation, cash), will be added back to the Plan Limit (as defined in the 2017 Plan) and again be available for the grant of Awards. The following shares of stock, however, will not be available again for grant under the 2017 Plan:
(i) shares of CVS Health stock not issued or delivered as a result of net settlement of an outstanding option or stock appreciation right (SAR);
(ii) shares of CVS Health stock delivered or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes with respect to an Award; and
(iii) shares of CVS Health stock repurchased with proceeds from the payment of the exercise price of an option.
The administrator of the 2017 Plan has discretion to adopt reasonable counting procedures to ensure appropriate counting, avoid double counting (as, for example, in the case of tandem or substitute awards) and make adjustments if the number of shares of Stock actually delivered differs from the number of shares previously counted in connection with an Award.
Annual Per-Person Limitations. The 2017 Plan imposes individual limitations on the amount of certain Awards in order to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Under these limitations, during any fiscal year the number of options, shares of restricted stock, RSUs, shares of deferred stock, shares of CVS Health stock issued as a bonus or in lieu of other obligations, and other stock-based Awards granted to any one participant shall not exceed one million shares for each type of such Award, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The maximum cash amount that may be earned as a final annual incentive award or other annual cash Award in respect of any fiscal year by any one participant is $10 million, and the maximum cash amount that may be earned as a final performance award or other cash Award in respect of a performance period other than an annual period by any one participant on an annualized basis is $5 million.
Non-Employee Director Award Limits. The 2017 Plan limits the Awards that may be made to a non-employee Director of the Company to $500,000 per director, with an additional $500,000 for the independent chairman or lead independent director, if any is so designated.
Eligibility. Executive officers and other officers and employees of CVS Health or any subsidiary, and any person who is a non-employee director of CVS Health, will be eligible to be granted Awards under the 2017 Plan. Based on current grant practices, approximately 40,000 persons are eligible to receive Awards under the 2017 Plan.
Administration. The 2017 Plan is administered by the Management Planning and Development Committee, except to the extent the Board elects to administer the 2017 Plan. Subject to the terms and conditions of the 2017 Plan, the Committee is authorized to select participants, determine the type and number of Awards to be granted and the number of shares of CVS Health stock or dollar amounts to which Awards will relate, specify times at which Awards will vest (including performance conditions that may be required as a condition thereof), set other terms and conditions of such Awards, prescribe forms of Award agreements, interpret and specify rules and regulations relating to the 2017 Plan, and make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2017 Plan.
Types of Awards.
68 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
ITEM 5: 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
no option or SAR may have a term
exceeding ten years. Options may be exercised by payment of the exercise
price in cash, CVS Health stock, outstanding Awards, or other property
having a fair market value equal to the exercise price, as the Committee
may determine from time to time.
|
|
● |
Restricted Stock, RSUs
and Deferred Stock.
The Committee is authorized to
grant restricted stock, RSUs and deferred stock. Restricted stock is a
grant of CVS
Health stock which may not be sold or
disposed of, and which may be forfeited in the event of certain
terminations of employment and/or failure to meet certain performance
requirements prior to the end of a restricted period specified by the
Committee. Restricted stock and RSUs typically vest over a three- to
five-year period, or if based on performance requirements vest over a
minimum period of one year. A participant granted restricted stock
generally has all of the rights of a stockholder of CVS Health, including
the right to vote the shares and to receive dividends thereon upon
vesting, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. An RSU or an award
of deferred stock confers upon a participant the right to receive shares
at the end of a specified restricted or deferral period, subject to
possible forfeiture of the Award in the event of certain terminations of
employment and/or failure to meet certain performance requirements prior
to the end of a specified restricted period (which restricted period need
not extend for the entire duration of the deferral period). Prior to
settlement, an RSU or an Award of deferred stock carries no voting or
dividend rights or other rights associated with share ownership, although
dividend equivalents may be granted, as discussed
below.
|
● |
Dividend
Equivalents.
The Committee is authorized to grant
dividend equivalents conferring on participants the right to receive, on
an accrual basis, cash, shares, or other property equal in value to
dividends paid on a specific number of shares or other periodic payments.
Dividend equivalents may not be granted in connection
with stock options and SARs, and shall be paid on an accrued basis only
upon the vesting of the Award, or may be deemed to have been reinvested in
additional shares, Awards, or other investment vehicles specified by the
Committee.
|
● |
Bonus Stock and Awards in Lieu of
Cash Obligations.
The Committee is
authorized to grant shares as a bonus free of restrictions, or to grant
shares or other Awards in lieu of obligations to pay cash under other
plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as the Committee
may specify.
|
● |
Other Stock-Based
Awards.
The 2017 Plan authorizes the
Committee to grant Awards that are denominated or payable in, valued by
reference to, or otherwise based on or related to shares. Such Awards
might include
convertible or exchangeable
debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into shares,
purchase rights for shares, Awards with value and payment contingent upon
performance of CVS Health or any other factors designated by the
Committee, and Awards valued by reference to the book value of shares or
the value of securities of or the performance of specified subsidiaries.
The Committee determines the terms and conditions of such Awards,
including consideration to be paid to exercise Awards in the nature of
purchase rights, the period during which Awards will be outstanding and
forfeiture conditions and restrictions on Awards. Other stock-based awards
vest over a minimum three-year period, or if based on performance
requirements vest over a minimum period of one
year.
|
● |
Performance Awards, Including
Annual Incentive Awards.
The right of a
participant to exercise or receive a grant or settlement of an Award, and
the timing thereof, may be subject to such performance conditions as may
be specified by the Committee. In addition, the 2017 Plan authorizes
specific annual incentive awards, which represent a conditional right to
receive cash, shares or other Awards upon achievement of pre-established
performance goals during a specified one-year period.
Performance awards and annual incentive awards granted
to persons the Committee expects may, for the year in which a deduction
arises, be among the CEO and other highly-compensated executive officers
subject to the limitation on tax deductibility under IRC Section 162(m),
will, if so intended by the Committee, be subject to provisions that
should qualify such Awards as performance-based compensation under IRC
Section 162(m).
|
● | The performance goals to be achieved as a condition of payment or settlement of a performance award or annual incentive award will consist of (i) one or more business criteria, and (ii) targeted level(s) of performance with respect to each business criterion. In the case of performance awards intended to meet the requirements of IRC Section 162(m), the business criteria used must be one of those specified in the 2017 Plan, although for other participants the Committee may specify any other criteria. The business criteria specified in the 2017 Plan are: (1) earnings per share; (2) revenues; (3) cash flow; (4) cash flow return on investment; (5) return on net assets, return on assets, return on investment, return on capital, or return on equity; (6) economic value added; (7) operating margin; (8) Common Knowledge Retail Customer Service score or a similar customer service measurement as measured by a third-party administrator; (9) Pharmacy Benefit Services Customer Satisfaction score (10) net income; pretax earnings; pretax earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization; pretax operating earnings |
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
69 |
ITEM 5: 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
after interest expense and before incentives, service fees and extraordinary or special items; or operating earnings; (11) total stockholder return; or (12) any of the above goals as compared to the performance of a published or special index deemed applicable by the Committee including, but not limited to, Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index or a group of comparable companies.
In granting annual incentive or performance awards, the Committee may establish unfunded award pools, the amounts of which will be based upon the achievement of a performance goal or goals using one or more of the business criteria described in the preceding paragraph. During the first 90 days of a fiscal year or other performance period (or such other period as permitted under IRC Section 162(m)), the Committee will determine who will potentially receive annual incentive or performance awards for that fiscal year or other performance period, either out of the pool or otherwise. After the end of each fiscal year or other performance period, the Committee will determine the amount, if any, of the pool, the maximum amount of potential annual incentive or performance awards payable to each participant in the pool, and the amount of any potential annual incentive or performance award otherwise payable to a participant. The Committee may, in its discretion, determine that the amount payable as a final annual incentive or performance award will be increased or reduced from the amount of any potential Award, but may not exercise discretion to increase any such amount intended to qualify under IRC Section 162(m).
Subject to the requirements of the 2017 Plan, the Committee will determine other performance award and annual incentive award terms, including the required levels of performance with respect to the business criteria, the corresponding amounts payable upon achievement of such levels of performance, termination and forfeiture provisions, and the form of settlement.
No Repricing or Cash Buyouts. The Committee may not, without further approval of CVS Health stockholders, grant any Award under the 2017 Plan or make any payment or exchange that would constitute a repricing of any option or SAR granted under the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan also does not permit cash buyouts of stock options or SARs.
Other Terms of Awards. Awards may be settled in the form of cash, CVS Health stock, other Awards, or other property, in the discretion of the Committee. The Committee may require or permit participants to defer the settlement of all or part of an Award in accordance with such terms and conditions as the Committee may establish, including payment or crediting of interest or dividend equivalents on deferred amounts, and the crediting of earnings, gains and losses based on deemed investment of deferred amounts in specified investment vehicles, provided, however, that dividends or dividend equivalents may not be paid on unvested Awards. The Committee may condition any payment relating to an Award on the withholding of taxes and may provide that a portion of any shares or other property to be distributed will be withheld (or previously acquired shares or other property surrendered by the participant) to satisfy withholding and other tax obligations. Awards granted under the 2017 Plan generally may not be pledged or otherwise encumbered and are not transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or to a designated beneficiary upon the participants death, except that the Committee may, in its discretion, permit transfers for estate planning or other purposes.
Recoupment Policy. Unless the Award agreement specifies otherwise, the Committee may cancel or rescind Awards if the participant fails to comply with certain non-competition, confidentiality, intellectual property or other covenants. In addition, Awards under the 2017 Plan will be subject to the Recoupment Policy as in effect from time to time (for more information on that policy see page 54 of this proxy statement), as well as other recoupment policies or provisions as may be required under the terms of any agreement between the Company and any regulatory authority or as may be required under applicable law.
Double Trigger Change in Control. The Committee may, in its discretion, accelerate the exercisability, the lapsing of restrictions, or the expiration of deferral or vesting periods of any Award, and such accelerated exercisability, lapse, expiration and vesting shall occur automatically in the case of an actual or constructive termination without cause within two years of a Change in Control, as defined in the 2017 Plan. In addition, the Committee may provide that performance goals relating to any performance-based award will be deemed to have been met at actual performance or prorated to the date of termination following a Change in Control.
No Liberal Definition of Change in Control. Change in Control is defined in the 2017 Plan to include the following events:
● |
changes in the stock ownership of the Company, or a
subsidiary owning substantially all of the consolidated assets of the
Company (Significant Subsidiary), representing in excess of 30% of the
voting power of then outstanding securities of the Company or Significant
Subsidiary;
|
● |
changes of a majority of CVS Healths board of directors
during a 12-month period;
|
● | mergers and consolidations of the Company or a Significant Subsidiary, unless the voting securities of the Company or Significant Subsidiary continue to represent more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving or resulting entity; and |
70 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
ITEM 5: 2017 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN |
● | sales or dispositions of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of CVS Health (in no event less than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all consolidated assets of the Company), in a single transaction or series of transactions over a 12-month period. |
Amendment and Termination of the 2017 Plan. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the 2017 Plan or the Committees authority to grant Awards without further stockholder approval, except stockholder approval must be obtained for any amendment or alteration if required by law or regulation or under the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the shares are then listed or quoted. Stockholder approval will not be deemed to be required under laws or regulations, such as those relating to ISOs, that condition favorable treatment of participants on such approval, although the Board may, in its discretion, seek stockholder approval in any circumstance in which it deems such approval advisable. Thus, stockholder approval will not necessarily be required for amendments that might increase the cost of the 2017 Plan. Unless earlier terminated by the Board or extended by the stockholders, the 2017 Plan will have a term that expires on May 9, 2027, after which no further Awards may be made, provided, however, that the provisions of the Plan shall continue to apply to Awards made prior to such date. Additionally, the 2017 Plan will terminate at such time as no shares remain available for issuance under the 2017 Plan and CVS Health has no further rights or obligations with respect to outstanding Awards under the 2017 Plan.
Certain Federal Income Tax Implications of the 2017 Plan. The following is a brief description of the federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to Awards under the 2017 Plan.
The grant of an option will create no tax consequences for the participant or CVS Health. A participant will not recognize taxable income upon exercising an ISO (except that the alternative minimum tax may apply). Upon exercising an option other than an ISO, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the difference between the exercise price and fair market value of the freely transferable and non-forfeitable shares acquired on the date of exercise.
Upon a disposition of shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before the end of the applicable ISO holding periods, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise of the ISO minus the exercise price, or (ii) the amount realized upon the disposition of the ISO shares minus the exercise price. Otherwise, a participants disposition of shares acquired upon the exercise of an option (including an ISO for which the ISO holding periods are met) generally will result in short-term or long-term capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price and the participants tax basis in such shares (the tax basis generally being the exercise price plus any amount previously recognized as ordinary income in connection with the exercise of the option).
CVS Health generally will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by the participant in connection with an option. CVS Health generally is not entitled to a tax deduction relating to amounts that represent a capital gain to a participant. Accordingly, CVS Health will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an ISO if the participant holds the shares for the ISO holding periods prior to disposition of the shares.
With respect to Awards granted under the 2017 Plan that result in the payment or issuance of cash or shares or other property that is either not restricted as to transferability or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or the fair market value of shares or other property received. Thus, deferral of the time of payment or issuance will generally result in the deferral of the time the participant will be liable for income taxes with respect to such payment or issuance. CVS Health generally will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.
With respect to Awards involving the issuance of shares or other property that is restricted as to transferability and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares or other property received at the first time the shares or other property becomes transferable or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier. A participant may elect to be taxed at the time of receipt of shares or other property rather than upon lapse of restrictions on transferability or substantial risk of forfeiture, but if the participant subsequently forfeits such shares or property, the participant would not be entitled to any tax deduction, including as a capital loss, for the value of the shares or property on which he previously paid tax. The participant must file such election with the Internal Revenue Service within 30 days of the receipt of the shares or other property. CVS Health generally will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.
The foregoing summary of the federal income tax consequences in respect of the 2017 Plan is for general information only. Interested parties should consult their own advisors as to specific tax consequences, including the application and effect of foreign, state and local tax laws.
Awards under 2017 Plan. Awards to be granted after May 10, 2017 under the 2017 Plan are not determinable at this time. For information on awards made to NEOs under the 2010 Plan, see the tables on pages 59-61.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
71 |
ITEM 6: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE OWNERSHIP THRESHOLD FOR CALLING SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS |
On or about December 6, 2016, the Company received the following proposal from Mr. William Steiner, 112 Abbottsford Gate, Piermont, NY 10968, and his proxy John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, who represent that Mr. Steiner is the beneficial owner of no less than 100 shares of the Companys stock. In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement (William Steiner Proposal) in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us:
Resolved, Shareowners ask our board to take the steps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holders in the aggregate of 15% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our boards current power to call a special meeting.
Dozens of Fortune 500 companies allow 10% of shares to call a special meeting and this proposal is only asking that 15% of our shares be enabled to call a special meeting. Special meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. Shareowner input on the timing of shareowner meetings is especially important when events unfold quickly and issues may become moot by the next annual meeting. This is important because there could be 15-months or more between annual meetings.
This proposal is of more importance to our company. GMI Analyst said CEO Larry Merlos pay and perks were flagged as being excessive relative to peers and other named executive officers, resulting in a 20% negative Say-on-Pay vote in 2016. If Merlo was fired without cause, unvested equity awards would vest immediately. These provisions provide for excessive levels of potential payments that are not linked to company performance.
CVS Health Corp.s Audit Committee chair and director Richard Swift served on 4 additional boards including as Lead Director and Audit Committee chair at Ingersoll-Rand plc. In addition, CVSs Audit Committee was not fully independent due to the membership of Richard Bracken, a director (and retired chairman and CEO) of HCA Holdings, Inc. CVS Health was also flagged for excessive asset-liability ratios, relative to peers.
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD RECOMMENDING A VOTE AGAINST THE WILLIAM STEINER PROPOSAL
CVS Health is strongly committed to good governance practices and is keenly interested in the views and concerns of our stockholders. To that end, since 2010 the Company has included, in both its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Charter) and Amended and Restated By-laws (By-laws), provisions that allow stockholders owning 25% of our outstanding common stock the right to call a special meeting, provided certain requirements are met. The Board put these Charter and By-law provisions to a vote at its 2010 annual meeting and the Companys stockholders overwhelmingly supported the provisions, with a vote in favor of over 97%. The Board continues to believe that 25% is an appropriate threshold for this right, particularly when viewed in connection with the many stockholder protections CVS Health has adopted and our strong corporate governance practices in general. CVS Healths 25% ownership threshold is also a very common threshold among large public companies that offer stockholders the right to call a special meeting.
CVS Health has adopted many leading corporate governance practices, including the annual election of all directors, majority voting in director elections, the right of stockholders to act by written consent that is less than unanimous, and a proxy access by-law. Our current QualityScore ratings from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) include a 1 in Board Structure and a 2 in Shareholder Rights, meaning that CVS Health is in the top 10% and 20%, respectively, of ranked companies in those categories. The Companys overall QualityScore is a 2 (top 20%), indicating that ISS views our Company as among the lowest in terms of governance risks.
If adopted, this proposal would have the effect of allowing a relatively small minority of stockholders with narrow interests to call special meetings to consider matters that may not be in the best interests of all of our stockholders. We observe that calling a special meeting of stockholders is not a matter to be taken lightly. We believe that a special meeting should only be held to cover extraordinary events, when fiduciary, strategic, significant
72 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS: ITEM 7 |
transactional or similar considerations dictate that the matter be addressed on an expeditious basis, rather than waiting until the next annual meeting. Organizing and preparing for a special meeting involves significant management commitment of time and focus, and imposes substantial legal, administrative and distribution costs. Recognizing the substantial administrative and financial burdens that a special meeting imposes on the Company and its stockholders, the Board believes that CVS Healths existing 25% ownership threshold strikes the appropriate balance between allowing stockholders to vote on important matters that arise between annual meetings and protecting against the risk that a small group of stockholders could call a meeting that serves only a narrow agenda not favored by the majority of stockholders. We therefore continue to believe that at least 25% of our stockholders should agree that a matter be addressed before a special meeting is called.
ITEM 7: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING A REPORT ON EXECUTIVE PAY |
On or about December 2, 2016, the Company received the following proposal from Zevin Asset Management, LLC (Zevin), 11 Beacon Street, Suite 1125, Boston, MA 02108, on behalf of its client the Claire L. Bateman 1991 Trust. Zevin represents that its client is the beneficial owner of 175 shares of the Companys stock. In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement (Bateman Proposal) in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us:
WHEREAS: Recent events have increased concerns about the extraordinarily high levels of executive compensation at many U.S. corporations. Concerns about the structure of executive compensation packages have also intensified, with some suggesting compensation systems incentivize excessive risk-taking.
In a Forbes article on Wall Street pay, the director of the Program on Corporate Governance at Harvard Law School noted that compensation policies will prove to be quite costly excessively costly to shareholders. A study by Glass Lewis & Co. declared that compensation packages for the most highly paid U.S. executives have been so over-the-top that they have skewed the standards for whats reasonable. That study also found CEO pay may be high even when performance is mediocre or dismal.
On July 25, 2015, The New York Times featured an extended front-page article entitled: Pay Gap Widening as Top Workers Reap the Raises. A September 5, 2015 New York Times article (Low-Income Workers See Biggest Drop in Paychecks) showed the decline in real wages (2009-2014) for the lowest-paid quintile was -5.7 percent while that of the highest-paid quintile was less than half of that: -2.6 percent.
A 2015 Harvard Business Review article cited a recent global study finding that CEO-to-worker pay ratio in most countries is at least 50 to one, but in the United States its 354 to one.
In a 2015 PayScale report, CVS Health had the largest ratio between CEO and employee pay among all companies studied: approximately 434 to 1.
Some companies have begun disclosing CEO-to-worker pay ratios in anticipation of the Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission in August 2015. Beginning in 2018, that rule will require issuers to report the ratio between median employee compensation and the CEOs total compensation.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
73 |
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS: ITEM 7 |
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD RECOMMENDING A VOTE AGAINST THE BATEMAN PROPOSAL
As required by the SEC, we provide a detailed report on executive compensation in our annual proxy statement. The compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A) section of this proxy statement describes our executive compensation practices in detail, elaborating on all material elements of our executive compensation program and policies with accompanying tables that quantify our named executive officer pay in accordance with SEC requirements. The CD&A also examines the compensation decision-making process of the Management Planning and Development Committee (for purposes of this statement, the Committee), describes the material components of our executive compensation packages and discusses the goals and underpinnings of our compensation program. The report requested by the Bateman Proposal is duplicative of this required disclosure, which is provided at pages 35 through 56 above. Additionally, in 2018, as will then be required by SEC rules, we will disclose the ratio of our CEOs pay to that of our median employee. Given the extensive compensation-related disclosure already provided to our stockholders, the requested review and report would divert our resources and attention while providing stockholders with little or no incremental information.
Putting aside the Bateman Proposals call for information that is redundant with information that is already provided, or that will be required to be provided under newly adopted SEC rules, we are opposed to the Bateman Proposal in principle. The Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, and the full Board, are best placed to determine what factors should be considered when making decisions on executive pay and to implement executive compensation practices that are aligned with the interests of our stockholders. This proxy statement highlights the Committees mandate under its charter and describes the rigorous policies and practices we have implemented to provide appropriate executive compensation. We believe that adoption of the policy requested by the proponent does not serve to enhance a compensation decision-making process that is focused on the long-term performance of CVS Health, taking into account best practices, market competitiveness and our strategic, operational and financial goals and other appropriate factors in the Committees judgment. Adoption of the unnecessary and arbitrary Bateman Proposal would not support these objectives and would not be in the best interests of our stockholders.
The Board also notes that the proponent submitted this same proposal for a vote in 2016, and the Companys stockholders overwhelmingly rejected it, by a vote of:
● |
For: 6.8%
|
● |
Against: 87.5%
|
● | Abstain: 5.6% |
74 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS: ITEM 8 |
ITEM 8: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING A REPORT ON RENEWABLE ENERGY TARGETS |
On or about November 23, 2016, the Company received the following proposal from Zevin Asset Management, LLC (Zevin), 11 Beacon Street, Suite 1125, Boston, MA 02108, on behalf of its client the Pamela L Parker Trust. Zevin represents that its client is the beneficial owner of 660 shares of the Companys stock. In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement (Parker Proposal) in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us:
Costs of generating electricity from sources like wind and solar have been declining rapidly and are influencing companies response to climate change. The EPA currently lists 78 Fortune 500 companies as purchasing renewable energy (or certificates).
CVS Health Corporation (CVS or the Company) has taken halting steps in this direction. According to the 2015 Corporate Social Responsibility report, the Companys renewable energy program includes solar panels at five stores and a sixth store under construction. CVS states that it is constantly evaluating opportunities through renewable technologies, renewable energy credits, power purchase agreements, and tax credits.
In its response to the 2016 CDP Climate Change questionnaire, CVS indicates that it will set a science-based target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with IPCC guidance.
Yet CVS still lacks a quantitative target for renewable energy sourcing and/or production.
Investors are concerned that CVS may be behind other large corporations which are developing quantitative renewable energy goals in response to climate change. The RE100, a coalition pushing companies to switch to 100 percent renewable energy, now includes Apple, General Motors, Johnson & Johnson, Nestle, Procter & Gamble, Unilever, and Walmart. Walmart has a goal of sourcing 100 percent of its electricity from renewable energy and an interim target to produce or procure 7,000 GWh of renewable energy globally by the end of 2020.
Investors seek clarity on how renewable energy plays into CVSs overall response to climate change. Failure to set a renewable energy target may impede the Companys GHG reduction strategy. By setting quantitative goals on renewable energy, our Company can strengthen its current climate change strategy, respond ably to energy market changes, move closer to achieving GHG reductions, and help meet the global need for cleaner energy.
Resolved: Shareholders request that CVS produce a report assessing the climate benefits and feasibility of adopting enterprise-wide, quantitative, time-bound targets for increasing CVSs renewable energy sourcing and/or production. The report should be produced at reasonable cost, in a reasonable timeframe, and omitting proprietary and confidential information. This proposal does not prescribe matters of operational or financial management.
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDING A VOTE AGAINST THE PARKER PROPOSAL
The Board has considered the Parker Proposal and believes it is unnecessary in light of CVS Healths ongoing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pursue sustainability initiatives while optimizing efficiency. The Board is committed to reducing the environmental impact of the Companys business operations and to promote the conservation of the natural resources used by the Company.
In addition to completing the questionnaire from CDP (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project) and disclosing data around GHG emissions each year, the Company already provides information on its sustainability efforts with its stockholders though the Companys annual Corporate Social Responsibility Report, which is available at https://cvshealth. com/social-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-csr. The Corporate Social Responsibility Report details our corporate sustainability goals on energy efficiency, renewables, reducing GHG emissions, reducing waste, and developing sustainable products and packaging, as well as the steps being taken to achieve those goals, including the fact that we have been measuring and reporting our GHG emissions since 2008. As detailed in the report, we set specific internal and external targets that help reduce GHG emissions while driving operational efficiency, including targets relating to the reduction of energy use, water use and waste in its retail drug
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
75 |
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS: ITEM 8 |
stores. We pursue energy efficiency and cost-savings through detailed, thoughtful and Company-specific measures that are designed to address the particular impact our operations have on the environment and the best ways to mitigate those effects. Our Board of Directors believes that these measures more than adequately address the concerns underlying the Parker Proposal.
As just a few examples of our accomplishments that we believe have positively impacted the environmental footprint and overall sustainability of our business, we ask that you consider the following:
● |
In 2015, we achieved a 16% reduction
in carbon intensity, exceeding our internal target of reducing carbon
intensity by 15% per square foot of retail space by
2018.
|
● |
In 2015, we retrofitted 349 stores
with LED lighting, which yields a 10% increase in efficiency compared to
high-efficiency florescent solutions.
|
● |
We began implementing improved
routing software in our fleet in 2015, which saved approximately 34,450
gallons of fuel at only 50% program completion by the end of 2015;
|
● |
We maintained the same level of
electricity usage in 2015 as compared to 2014 despite an increase in
overall square footage of 1.8% and the introduction of open-air
refrigeration units in 450 stores, attributable to store energy efficiency
initiatives.
|
● |
We decreased our usage of natural gas by 12% in 2015 compared to 2014. |
We also have established committees and task forces to provide guidance on sustainability-related decisions and initiatives. These include the Energy Technology Assessment Committee, which works to identify opportunities across our operations to reduce energy and GHG emissions while also lowering costs. We continue to work towards further reductions and seek to establish a new GHG emissions reduction target within the next year.
We are proud of our environmental leadership and thoughtful, business-appropriate initiatives that our management works hard to integrate through measures to reduce GHG emissions, increase energy efficiency, reduce cost and remain competitive, and we believe that these measures compare favorably with the guidelines and requested practices embodied in the Parker Proposal.
In light of our existing efforts, accomplishments and reporting, we believe that a stand-alone report, as described in the proposal, would be duplicative of the overall sustainability reporting that we currently provide and would not be an effective use of our Companys resources nor in the best interests of our Company or its stockholders.
76 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
OWNERSHIP OF AND TRADING IN OUR STOCK
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS |
CVS Health has long been mindful of the importance of equity ownership by directors and executive management as an effective link to stockholders and, as such, the Board maintains stock ownership guidelines for all directors, as well as for the officers serving on the Companys Business Planning Committee (BPC), and requires that directors and BPC members achieve compliance with the ownership requirements within five years of becoming a director or BPC member. Our named executive officers, who appear in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57, must maintain ownership levels as set forth in the table below. Shares included in the calculation to assess compliance with the guidelines include shares owned outright, unvested RSUs, shares held in the Deferred Stock Compensation Plan and shares purchased through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Unexercised stock options do not count toward satisfying the guidelines. The Board believes that these requirements emphasize the importance of equity ownership for the Board and executive management, which in turn reinforces alignment with stockholder interests. To further reinforce this commitment, the Board annually reviews the policy and compliance by directors and executives.
All non-employee directors must own a minimum of 10,000 shares of CVS Health common stock, which is worth approximately $800,000 based on the March 14, 2017 closing sale price of $79.89, or 11 times the amount of the annual cash retainer ($70,000). Directors must attain this minimum ownership level within five years of being elected to the Board and must retain this minimum ownership level for at least six months after leaving the Board. The current level of stock pay in the directors mix of annual compensation is intended to facilitate the directors ability to meet the ownership level within the timeframe. Each of our directors who has served in such capacity for at least five years has timely attained the minimum ownership level. Mmes. DeCoudreaux and DeParle and Mr. Bracken, each of whom has five years from the date of her or his election to the Board to attain the ownership requirement, are on track to meet this requirement.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
77 |
OWNERSHIP OF AND TRADING IN OUR STOCK: SHARE OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
The following table shows the share ownership, as of March 14, 2017, of each director, each executive officer appearing in the Summary Compensation Table found on page 57 and all directors and executive officers as a group, based on information provided by these individuals. Each individual beneficially owns less than 1% of our common stock and, except as described in the footnotes to the table, each person has sole investment and voting power over the shares. None of the shares listed below has been pledged as collateral.
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK 1 | ||||
NAME | NUMBER | PERCENT | ||
Richard M. Bracken | 5,244 | * | ||
C. David Brown II | 139,731 | 1 | * | |
Alecia A. DeCoudreaux | 6,452 | 1 | * | |
David M. Denton | 749,170 | 2 3 4 | * | |
Nancy-Ann M. DeParle | 9,900 | 1 | * | |
David W. Dorman | 89,142 | 1 | * | |
Anne M. Finucane | 19,705 | 1 5 | * | |
Helena B. Foulkes | 326,223 | 2 3 4 6 | * | |
Larry J. Merlo | 2,814,571 | 2 3 4 6 7 | * | |
Jean-Pierre Millon | 85,716 | 8 | * | |
Thomas M. Moriarty | 269,422 | 2 3 6 | * | |
Jonathan C. Roberts | 677,846 | 2 3 4 6 7 | * | |
Richard J. Swift | 59,353 | 1 | * | |
William C. Weldon | 14,582 | 1 | * | |
Tony L. White | 21,709 | 9 | * | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons) | 6,434,630 | 0.61% |
* |
Less than 1%. |
1 | Includes the following shares of common stock constituting deferred non-employee director compensation, which do not have current voting rights: Mr. Brown, 48,479; Ms. DeCoudreaux, 6,452; Ms. DeParle, 3,305; Mr. Dorman, 16,456; Ms. Finucane, 2,696; Mr. Swift, 53,595; Mr. Weldon, 12,991; and all non-employee directors as a group, 143,973. |
2 | Includes the following shares of common stock not currently owned, but subject to options which were outstanding on March 14, 2017 and were exercisable within 60 days thereafter: Mr. Denton, 338,166; Ms. Foulkes, 187,193; Mr. Merlo, 1,349,031; Mr. Moriarty, 181,078; Mr. Roberts, 434,450; and all executive officers as a group, 3,152,287. |
3 | Includes the following shares of common stock granted under the Companys 1997 and 2010 ICPs that remain subject to certain restrictions regarding employment and transfer as provided in the ICPs: Mr. Denton, 158,980; Ms. Foulkes, 41,172; Mr. Merlo, 209,398; Mr. Moriarty, 39,326; Mr. Roberts, 72,456; and all executive officers as a group, 776,673. |
4 | Includes shares of common stock held by the Trustee of the ESOP that are allocated to the executive officers as follows: Mr. Denton, 1,689; Ms. Foulkes 4,071; Mr. Merlo, 6,643; Mr. Roberts, 5,320; and all executive officers as a group, 18,300. |
5 | Includes 17,009 shares held in a family trust. |
6 | Includes the following shares of common stock that were receivable upon the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock units or the exercise of options, but the actual receipt of which was deferred pursuant to the Companys Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, and which do not have current voting rights: Ms. Foulkes, 51,389; Mr. Merlo, 605,988; Mr. Moriarty, 22,522; Mr. Roberts, 135,442; and all executive officers as a group, 867,824. |
7 | Includes the following hypothetical shares of common stock held in notional accounts in the Companys unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan, which do not have current voting rights: Mr. Merlo, 5,140; Mr. Roberts, 1,419 and all executive officers as a group, 7,026. |
8 | Includes 85,716 shares held in a family trust. |
9 | Includes 7 shares held by Mr. Whites wife. |
78 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
OWNERSHIP OF AND TRADING IN OUR STOCK: SHARE OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS |
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS |
We have been notified by the entities in the following table that each is the beneficial owner (as defined by the rules of the SEC) of more than five percent of our common stock. According to the most recent Schedule 13G filed by the beneficial owner with the SEC, these shares were acquired in the ordinary course of business and were not acquired for the purpose of, and do not have the effect of, changing or influencing control over us.
TITLE OF CLASS |
NAME AND
ADDRESS OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER |
NO. OF
SHARES
BENEFICIALLY OWNED 1 2 |
PERCENT OF
CLASS OWNED 1 2 |
Common Stock |
BlackRock, Inc.
1
55 East 52 nd Street New York, NY 10022 |
66,417,057 | 6.2% |
Common Stock |
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
2
100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 |
74,381,078 | 7.0% |
1 | Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed January 23, 2017. BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) is the parent holding company of a number of subsidiaries that hold CVS Health common stock for the benefit of various investors. BlackRock and/or its subsidiaries have sole voting power with respect to 54,713,960 of these shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 66,403,376 of these shares. |
2 | Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed February 9, 2017. The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard) directly or through its subsidiaries, holds CVS Health common stock for the benefit of shared various investors. Vanguard and/or its subsidiaries have sole voting power with respect to 1,673,428 of these shares, shared voting power with respect to 211,117 of these shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 72,512,905 of these shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,868,173 of these shares. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE |
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and any persons who own more than 10% of our common stock (Reporting Persons) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC. These Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 that they file with the SEC, though as a practical matter CVS Health assists its directors and executive officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing such forms on their behalf. Based on a review of forms filed with the SEC and written representations from our Reporting Persons, CVS Health believes that all forms were filed in a timely manner during 2016.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
79 |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING |
The Board of Directors of CVS Health is soliciting your proxy to vote at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (or at any adjournment of the meeting, referred to as the Meeting or Annual Meeting). This proxy statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote at the Meeting.
We began mailing this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card on or about March 31, 2017 to all stockholders entitled to vote. CVS Healths 2016 Annual Report, which includes our financial statements, is being sent with this proxy statement.
DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING
Date: | May 10, 2017 |
Time: | 9:00 A.M. Eastern Time |
Place: |
CVS Health Customer
Support Center
(Company Headquarters) One CVS Drive Woonsocket, Rhode Island 02895 |
Stockholders must present a form of personal photo identification in order to be admitted to the Meeting. No cell phones, cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Meeting. |
SHARES ENTITLED TO VOTE
Stockholders entitled to vote are those who owned CVS Health common stock at the close of business on the record date, which is March 14, 2017. As of the record date, there were 1,035,791,170 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share of CVS Health common stock that you own entitles you to one vote.
The Bank of New York Mellon presently holds shares of common stock as Trustee under the 401(k) Plan and the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of CVS Health Corporation and Affiliated Companies (ESOP). Each participant in the ESOP instructs the Trustee of the ESOP how to vote his or her shares. As to shares with respect to which the Trustee receives no timely voting instructions, the Trustee, pursuant to the ESOP Trust Agreement, votes these shares in the same proportion as it votes all the shares as to which it has received timely voting instructions. The results of the voting will be held in strict confidence by the Trustee. Please note that the cut-off date by which participants of the ESOP must submit their vote to the tabulator in order to be counted is 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2017.
TYPES OF OWNERSHIP OF OUR STOCK
If your shares are registered in your name with CVS Healths transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., you are the stockholder of record of those shares. This proxy statement and any accompanying materials have been provided directly to you by CVS Health.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and this proxy statement and any accompanying documents have been provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record, which is your nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card provided by your nominee or by following the nominees instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.
VOTING
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote. Stockholders of record may vote by calling a toll-free telephone number, by using the Internet or by mailing your signed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote by telephone or the Internet, you do NOT need to return your proxy card. Returning the proxy card by mail or voting by telephone or Internet will not affect your right to attend the Annual Meeting and change your vote, if desired.
If you are a beneficial owner, you will receive instructions from your nominee that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Many of these institutions offer telephone and Internet voting.
The enclosed proxy card indicates the number of shares that you own as of the record date.
80 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
OTHER INFORMATION: INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING |
Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. If you properly fill in your proxy card and send it to us in time to vote, or vote by telephone or the Internet, one of the individuals named on your proxy card (your proxy) will vote your shares as you have directed. If you sign the proxy card but do not make specific choices, your proxy will follow the Boards recommendations.
The Board of Directors and the Companys management have not received notice of, and are not aware of, any business to come before the Meeting other than the agenda items referred to in this proxy statement.
Revoking your proxy card
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy card by:
● |
sending in another signed proxy card
with a later date;
|
● |
providing subsequent telephone or
Internet voting instructions;
|
● |
notifying our Corporate Secretary in
writing before the Annual Meeting that you have revoked your proxy card;
or
|
● |
voting in person at the Annual Meeting. |
If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your nominee.
Voting in person
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, we will give you a ballot when you arrive. However, if your shares are held in the name of a nominee, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on March 14, 2017, the record date for voting.
Appointing your own proxy
If you want to give your proxy to someone other than the individuals named as proxies on the proxy card, you may cross out the names of those individuals and insert the name of the individual you are authorizing to vote. Either you or that authorized individual must present the proxy card at the Annual Meeting to vote.
Proxy solicitation
We are soliciting this proxy on behalf of our Board of Directors and will bear the solicitation expenses. We are making this solicitation by mail but we may also solicit by telephone, e-mail or in person. We have hired Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, CT 06902, for a fee of $20,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, to provide customary assistance to us in the solicitation. We will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries, if they so request, for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.
Householding
Under SEC rules, a single set of annual reports and proxy statements may be sent to any household at which two or more of our stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each stockholder continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive, conserves natural resources and reduces mailing and printing expenses for the Company. Nominees with accountholders who are stockholders may be householding our proxy materials. As indicated in the notice previously provided by these nominees to our stockholders, a single annual report and proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from an affected stockholder. Once you have received notice from your nominee that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate annual report and proxy statement, please notify your nominee so that separate copies may be delivered to you. Beneficial owners who currently receive multiple copies of the annual report and proxy statement at their address who would prefer that their communications be householded should contact their nominee. Stockholders of record who currently receive multiple copies of the annual report and proxy statement at their address who would prefer that their communications be householded, or stockholders of record who are currently participating in householding and would prefer to receive separate copies of our proxy materials, should contact our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, by writing to P.O. Box 64874, St. Paul, MN 55164-0874; by calling toll-free, 877-287-7526; or by e-mailing to stocktransfer@wellsfargo.com.
QUORUM REQUIREMENT
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting of holders of shares representing a majority of shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item absent instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instruction is given.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
81 |
OTHER INFORMATION: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND OTHER BUSINESS FOR OUR ANNUAL MEETING IN 2018 |
VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE PROPOSALS
Item 1: Election of directors |
Each director is elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to that directors election (at a meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present) by the holders of shares of common stock present in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. A majority of votes cast means that the number of votes for a directors election must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that directors election. Votes against a directors election will count as a vote cast, but abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as a vote cast with respect to that directors election and will have no effect. |
Item 4: Frequency of
say-on-pay votes |
Approval of the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation requires the favorable vote of the majority of votes cast for one of the three options provided, unless none of the three choices receives a majority, in which case we will consider the choice that receives the greatest number of votes (every one, two or three years) the frequency recommended by our stockholders. Abstentions are counted as shares present or represented and voting and have the effect of a vote against all of the frequencies. Broker non-votes are not counted as shares present or represented and voting and have no effect on the vote. |
All other items |
For Items 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8, approval is by affirmative vote (at a meeting at which a quorum is present) of a majority of the votes represented by the shares of common stock present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Abstentions are counted as shares present or represented and voting and have the effect of a vote against. Broker non-votes are not counted as shares present or represented and voting and have no effect on the vote. |
Broker Voting
Under NYSE rules, if the record holder of your shares (usually a nominee) holds your shares in its name, your nominee is permitted to vote your shares on Item 2, Ratification of Auditors, in its discretion, even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. On all other Items, your nominee is not permitted to vote your shares without your instructions and uninstructed shares are considered broker non-votes.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND OTHER BUSINESS FOR OUR ANNUAL MEETING IN 2018 |
If you want to submit a proposal for possible inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you must ensure your proposal is received by us on or before December 1, 2017 and is otherwise in compliance with SEC rules.
Under our proxy access by-law, if a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) who has owned at least 3% of our shares for at least three years and has complied with the other requirements set forth in the Companys by-laws wants us to include director nominees (up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board) in our proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the nominations must be received by our Corporate Secretary and must arrive at the Company in a timely manner, between 120 and 150 days prior to the anniversary of the date our proxy statement was first sent to stockholders in connection with our last annual meeting, which would be no earlier than November 1 and no later than December 1, 2017.
In addition, if a stockholder would like to present business at an annual meeting of stockholders that is not to be included in our proxy statement, the stockholder must provide notice to the Company as provided in its by-laws. Such notice must be addressed to our Corporate Secretary and must arrive at the Company in a timely manner, between 90 and 120 days prior to the anniversary of our last annual meeting, which would be no earlier than January 10 and February 9, 2018. Under our by-laws, any stockholder notice for presenting business at a meeting must include, among other things (1) the name and address, as they appear in our books, of the stockholder giving the notice, (2) the class and number of shares that are beneficially owned by the stockholder (including information concerning derivative ownership and other arrangements concerning our stock), (3) a brief description of the business to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, and (4) any material interest of the stockholder in such business. See Selecting Our Director Nominees Director Nominations for a description of the information required for director nominations.
OTHER MATTERS |
We do not know of any matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this proxy statement. If any other matter is presented, your proxy will vote on the matter in his best judgment.
March 31, 2017
82 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 Incentive Compensation Plan
of
CVS Health Corporation
1. Purpose . The purpose of this 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (the Plan) is to assist CVS Health Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), and its subsidiaries, in attracting, retaining and rewarding high-quality executives, employees, and other persons who provide services to the Corporation and/or its subsidiaries, to enable such persons to acquire or increase a proprietary interest in the Corporation in order to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such persons and the Corporations stockholders and to provide such persons with short- and long-term performance incentives to expend their maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value. The Plan is also intended to qualify certain compensation awarded under the Plan for maximum tax deductibility under Code Section 162(m) (as hereafter defined) to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee (or any successor committee) of the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
2. Definitions. For purposes of the Plan, the following terms shall be defined as set forth below, in addition to such terms defined in Section 1 hereof:
(a) Annual Incentive Award means a conditional right granted to a Participant under Section 9(c) hereof to receive a cash payment, Stock or other Award, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, after the end of a specified fiscal year.
(b) Award means any Option, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Stock Appreciation Right, Deferred Stock, Stock granted as a bonus or in lieu of another award, Stock awarded to a director pursuant to Section 8, Dividend Equivalent, Other Stock-Based Award, Performance Award or Annual Incentive Award, together with any other right or interest granted to a Participant under the Plan.
(c) Beneficiary means the person, persons, trust or trusts which have been designated by a Participant in his or her most recent written beneficiary designation filed with the Committee to receive the benefits specified under the Plan upon such Participants death or to which Awards or other rights are transferred if and to the extent permitted under Section 11(b) hereof. If, upon a Participants death, there is no designated Beneficiary or surviving designated Beneficiary, then the term Beneficiary means person, persons, trust or trusts entitled by will or the laws of descent and distribution to receive such benefits.
(d) Beneficial Owner shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act and any successor to such Rule.
(e) Board means the Corporations Board of Directors.
(f) Change in Control means Change in Control as defined with related terms in Section 10 of the Plan.
(g) Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, including regulations thereunder and successor provisions and regulations thereto.
(h) Committee means a committee of two or more directors designated by the Board to administer the Plan.
(i) Constructive Termination Without Cause shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10(c)(ii) hereof.
(j) Covered Employee means an Eligible Person who is a Covered Employee as specified in Section 9(e) of the Plan.
(k) Deferred Stock means a right, granted to a Participant under Section 6(e) hereof, to receive Stock, cash or a combination thereof at the end of a specified deferral period.
(l) Dividend Equivalent means a right, granted to a Participant under Section 6(g), to receive cash, Stock, other Awards or other property equal in value to dividends paid with respect to a specified number of shares of Stock, or other periodic payments.
(m) Eligible Person means each Executive Officer and other officers and employees of the Corporation or of any subsidiary, including such persons who may also be directors of the Corporation, and any Eligible Director. An employee on leave of absence may be considered as still in the employ of the Corporation or a subsidiary for purposes of eligibility for participation in the Plan.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-1 |
(n) Eligible Director means a director of the Corporation who at the relevant time is not, and for the preceding twelve (12) months was not, an employee of the Corporation or its subsidiaries.
(o) Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, including rules thereunder and successor provisions and rules thereto.
(p) Executive Officer means an executive officer of the Corporation as defined under the Exchange Act.
(q) Fair Market Value means the fair market value of Stock, Awards or other property as determined by the Committee or under procedures established by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Fair Market Value of Stock shall be the closing price of a share of Stock, as quoted on the composite transactions table on the New York Stock Exchange, on the date on which the determination of fair market value is being made. In the event the date on which the determination is being made is a date on which the New York Stock Exchange is closed, then the closing price of a share of Stock, as quoted on the composite transactions table on the New York Stock Exchange on the last date prior to such date on which the New York Stock Exchange was open, shall be used.
(r) Incentive Stock Option or ISO means any Option intended to be and designated as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Code Section 422 or any successor provision thereto; provided, however, that only an Eligible Person who is an employee within the meaning of Code Section 422 and the regulations thereunder shall be eligible to receive an ISO.
(s) Option means a right, granted to a Participant under Section 6(b) hereof, to purchase Stock or other Awards at a specified price during specified time periods.
(t) Other Stock-Based Awards means Awards granted to a Participant under Section 6(h) hereof.
(u) Participant means a person who has been granted an Award under the Plan that remains outstanding, including a person who is no longer an Eligible Person.
(v) Performance Award means a right, granted to a Participant under Section 9 hereof, to receive Awards based upon performance criteria specified by the Committee.
(w) Person shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, and shall include a group as defined in Section 13(d) thereof.
(x) Plan Limit means the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued for all purposes under the Plan as set forth is Section 4(a).
(y) Qualified Member means a member of the Committee who is a Non-Employee Director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) and an outside director within the meaning of Regulation 1.162-27 under Code Section 162(m).
(z) Recoupment Policy means the Recoupment Policy of CVS Health Corporation as amended and restated on May 19, 2016, as it may be amended from time to time.
(aa) Restricted Stock means Stock granted to a Participant under Section 6(d) hereof, that is subject to certain restrictions and to a risk of forfeiture.
(bb) Restricted Stock Unit shall mean a contractual right granted under Section 6(d) hereof that represents a right to receive the value of a share of Stock upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and the applicable Award agreement.
(cc) Rule 16b-3 means Rule 16b-3, as in effect from time to time and applicable to the Plan and Participants, promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
(dd) Stock means the Corporations Common Stock, and such other securities as may be substituted (or resubstituted) for Stock pursuant to Section 11(c) hereof.
(ee) Stock Appreciation Rights or SAR means a right granted to a Participant under Section 6(c) hereof.
(ff) Substitute Award means an Award granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Corporation or with which the Corporation combines.
(gg) Termination Without Cause shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10(c)(i) hereof.
A-2 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
3. Administration .
(a) Authority of the Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, except to the extent the Board elects to administer the Plan, in which case references herein to the Committee shall be deemed to include references to the Board. The Committee shall have full and final authority, in each case subject to and consistent with the provisions of the Plan, to select Eligible Persons to become Participants, grant Awards, determine the type, number and other terms and conditions of, and all other matters relating to, Awards, prescribe Award agreements (which need not be identical for each Participant) and rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, construe and interpret the Plan and Award agreements and correct defects, supply omissions or reconcile inconsistencies therein and to make all other decisions and determinations as the Committee may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.
(b) Manner of Exercise of Committee Authority . At any time that a member of the Committee is not a Qualified Member, any action of the Committee relating to an Award granted or to be granted to a Participant who is then subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act in respect of the Corporation, or relating to an Award intended by the Committee to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder, may be taken either (i) by a subcommittee, designated by the Committee, composed solely of two or more Qualified Members, or (ii) by the Committee but with each such member who is not a Qualified Member abstaining or recusing himself or herself from such action; provided, however, that, upon such abstention or recusal, the Committee remains composed solely of two or more Qualified Members. Such action, authorized by such a subcommittee or by the Committee upon the abstention or recusal of such non-Qualified Member(s), shall be the action of the Committee for purposes of the Plan. Any action of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including the Corporation, its subsidiaries, Participants, Beneficiaries, transferees under Section 11(b) hereof or other persons claiming rights from or through a Participant, and stockholders. The express grant of any specific power to the Committee, and the taking of any action by the Committee, shall not be construed as limiting any power or authority of the Committee. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may delegate to officers or managers of the Corporation or any subsidiary, or committees thereof, the authority, subject to such terms as the Committee shall determine, to perform such functions, including administrative functions, as the Committee may determine, to the extent that such delegation will not result in the loss of an exemption under Rule 16b-3(d)(1) for Awards granted to Participants subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act in respect of the Corporation and will not cause Awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) to fail to so qualify. The Committee may appoint agents to assist it in administering the Plan.
(c) Limitation of Liability . The Committee and each member thereof shall be entitled to rely or act upon in good faith any report or other information furnished to him or her by any executive officer, other officer or employee of the Corporation or a subsidiary, the Corporations independent auditors, consultants or any other agents assisting in the administration of the Plan. Members of the Committee and any officer or employee of the Corporation or a subsidiary acting at the direction or on behalf of the Committee shall not be personally liable for any action or determination taken or made in good faith with respect to the Plan and shall, to the extent permitted by law, be fully indemnified and protected by the Corporation with respect to any such action or determination.
4. Stock Subject to Plan .
(a) Overall Number of Shares Available for Delivery. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11(c) hereof, the total number of shares of Stock reserved and available for delivery in connection with Awards under the Plan shall be equal to: (i) twenty-one million (21,000,000); plus (ii) such additional number of shares of Stock reserved for issuance under the Corporations 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended on January 15, 2013 (the Existing Plan) that remain available for grant under the Existing Plan immediately prior to the Corporations 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that the total number of shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted under the Plan shall not exceed three million (3,000,000). Any shares of Stock delivered under the Plan shall consist of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. Following approval of the Plan by the Corporations stockholders, the Existing Plan shall be retired and no further awards shall be granted from the Existing Plan; provided, however, that awards previously granted under the Existing Plan shall continue to be governed by the terms of the Existing Plan and any agreements pertaining to those awards.
(b) Application of Limitation to Grants of Awards . No Award may be granted if the number of shares of Stock to be delivered in connection with such Award exceeds the number of shares of Stock remaining available under the Plan after taking into account the number of shares issuable in settlement of Awards or relating to then-outstanding Awards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Awards settleable only in cash shall not reduce the number of shares of Stock available under the Plan and Stock issued for
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-3 |
Substitute Awards shall not count against the limits of Section 4(a). Additionally, for purposes of determining the number of shares of Stock that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the number of shares of Stock corresponding to Awards under the Plan that are forfeited or cancelled or otherwise expire for any reason without having been exercised or settled, or that are settled through the issuance of consideration other than shares of Stock (including, without limitation, cash), shall be added back to the Plan Limit and again be available for the grant of Awards. The following shares of Stock, however, shall not be available again for grant under the Plan:
(i) shares of Stock not issued or delivered as a result of net settlement of an outstanding Option or SAR;
(ii) shares of Stock delivered or withheld by the Corporation to pay the exercise price of or the withholding taxes with respect to an Award; and
(iii) shares of Stock repurchased with proceeds from the payment of the exercise price of an Option.
The Committee has discretion to adopt reasonable counting procedures to ensure appropriate counting, avoid double counting (as, for example, in the case of tandem or substitute awards) and make adjustments if the number of shares of Stock actually delivered differs from the number of shares previously counted in connection with an Award.
5. Eligibility ; Per-Person Award Limitations . Awards may be granted under the Plan only to Eligible Persons. In each fiscal year during any part of which the Plan is in effect, an Eligible Person may not be granted Awards relating to more than one million (1,000,000) shares of Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11(c), under each of Sections 6(b) through 6(h), 9(b) and 9(c). In addition, the maximum cash amount that may be earned under the Plan as a final Annual Incentive Award or other cash annual Award in respect of any fiscal year by any one Participant shall be ten million dollars ($10,000,000), and the maximum cash amount that may be earned under the Plan as a final Performance Award or other cash Award in respect of a performance period other than an annual period by any one Participant on an annualized basis shall be five million dollars ($5,000,000).
6. Specific Terms of Awards .
(a) General. Awards may be granted on the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 6, and with respect to directors of the Corporation, in Section 8. In addition, the Committee may impose on any Award or the exercise thereof, at the date of grant or thereafter (subject to Section 11(e)), such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine, including terms requiring forfeiture of Awards in the event of termination of employment of the Participant and terms permitting a Participant to make elections relating to his or her Award. The Committee shall retain full power and discretion to accelerate, waive or modify, at any time, any term or condition of an Award that is not mandatory under the Plan. Except in cases in which the Committee is authorized to require other forms of consideration under the Plan, or to the extent other forms of consideration must be paid to satisfy the requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law, no consideration other than services may be required for the grant of any Award.
(b) Options. The Committee is authorized to grant Options to Participants on the following terms and conditions:
(i) Exercise Price. The exercise price per share of Stock purchasable under an Option shall be determined by the Committee, provided that such exercise price shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such Option except as provided under the first sentence of Section 7(a) hereof.
(ii) Time and Method of Exercise. The Committee shall determine the time or times at which or the circumstances under which an Option may be exercised in whole or in part (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), the methods by which such exercise price may be paid or deemed to be paid, the form of such payment, including, without limitation, cash, Stock, other Awards or awards granted under other plans of the Corporation or any subsidiary, or other property, and the methods by or forms in which Stock will be delivered or deemed to be delivered to Participants.
(iii) ISOs. The terms of any ISO granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Code Section 422. Anything in the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no term of the Plan relating to ISOs shall be interpreted, amended or altered, nor shall any discretion or authority granted under the Plan be exercised, so as to disqualify either the Plan or any ISO under Code Section 422, unless the Participant has first requested the change that will result in such disqualification.
A-4 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
(c) Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee is authorized to grant SARs to Participants on the following terms and conditions:
(i) Right to Payment. A SAR shall confer on the Participant to whom it is granted a right to receive, upon exercise thereof, the excess of (A) the Fair Market Value of one share of Stock on the date of exercise over (B) the grant price of the SAR as determined by the Committee.
(ii) Other Terms. The Committee shall determine at the date of grant or thereafter, the time or times at which and the circumstances under which a SAR may be exercised in whole or in part (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), the method of exercise, method of settlement, form of consideration payable in settlement, method by or forms in which Stock will be delivered or deemed to be delivered to Participants, whether or not a SAR shall be in tandem or in combination with any other Award and any other terms and conditions of any SAR. The exercise price of a SAR shall be determined by the Committee, provided that such exercise price shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such SAR. SARs may be either freestanding or in tandem with other Awards.
(d) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. The Committee is authorized to grant Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units to Participants on the following terms and conditions:
(i) Grant and Restrictions. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions, if any, as the Committee may impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), in such installments or otherwise, as the Committee may determine at the date of grant or thereafter. Except to the extent restricted under the terms of the Plan and any Award agreement relating to the Restricted Stock, a Participant granted Restricted Stock shall have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote the Restricted Stock and the right to receive dividends thereon, provided that dividends shall accrue and be paid only upon vesting, and may be subject to any mandatory reinvestment or any other requirement that may imposed by the Committee. During the restricted period applicable to the Restricted Stock, subject to Section 11(b) below, the Restricted Stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, margined or otherwise encumbered by the Participant. Restricted Stock Units may be settled in Stock, cash equal to the Fair Market Value of the specified number of shares of Stock covered by the Units, or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee at the date of grant or thereafter.
(ii) Forfeiture. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, upon termination of employment during the applicable restriction period, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that are at that time subject to restrictions shall be forfeited, provided that the Committee may provide, by rule or regulation or in any Award agreement, or may determine in any individual case, that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be waived in whole or in part in the event of terminations resulting from specified causes and the Committee may in other cases waive in whole or in part the forfeiture of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.
(iii) Certificates for Stock. Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee shall determine. If certificates representing Restricted Stock are registered in the name of the Participant, the Committee may require that such certificates bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock, that the Corporation retain physical possession of the certificates and that the Participant deliver a stock power to the Corporation, endorsed in blank, relating to the Restricted Stock.
(iv) Dividends and Splits. As a condition to the grant of an Award of Restricted Stock, the Committee may require that any cash dividends paid on a share of Restricted Stock be automatically reinvested in additional shares of Restricted Stock or applied to the purchase of additional Awards under the Plan, or shall require vesting of an Award prior to payment of accrued cash dividends. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, Stock distributed in connection with a Stock split or Stock dividend, and other property distributed as a dividend, shall be subject to restrictions and a risk of forfeiture to the same extent as the Restricted Stock with respect to which such Stock or other property has been distributed. The Committee shall determine and specify in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement the effect, if any, of dividends paid on Stock during the period such Award is outstanding.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-5 |
(e) Deferred Stock. The Committee is authorized to grant Deferred Stock to Participants, which are rights to receive Stock, cash, or a combination thereof at the end of a specified deferral period, subject to the following terms and conditions:
(i) Award and Restrictions. Satisfaction of an Award of Deferred Stock shall occur upon expiration of the deferral period specified for such Deferred Stock by the Committee (or, if permitted by the Committee, as elected by the Participant). In addition, Deferred Stock shall be subject to such restrictions (which may include a risk of forfeiture) as the Committee may impose, if any, which restrictions may lapse at the expiration of the deferral period or at earlier specified times (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), separately or in combination, in installments or otherwise, as the Committee may determine. Deferred Stock may be satisfied by delivery of Stock, cash equal to the Fair Market Value of the specified number of shares of Stock covered by the Deferred Stock, or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee at the date of grant or thereafter.
(ii) Forfeiture. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, upon termination of employment during the applicable deferral period or portion thereof to which forfeiture conditions apply (as provided in the Award agreement evidencing the Deferred Stock), all Deferred Stock that is at that time subject to deferral (other than a deferral at the election of the Participant) shall be forfeited; provided that the Committee may provide, by rule or regulation or in any Award agreement, or may determine in any individual case, that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to Deferred Stock shall be waived in whole or in part in the event of terminations resulting from specified causes, and the Committee may in other cases waive in whole or in part the forfeiture of Deferred Stock.
(iii) Dividend Equivalents. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at date of grant, Dividend Equivalents on the specified number of shares of Stock covered by an Award of Deferred Stock shall be either (A) paid with respect to such Deferred Stock at the dividend payment date in cash or in shares of unrestricted Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such dividends, or (B) deferred with respect to such Deferred Stock and the amount or value thereof automatically deemed reinvested in additional Deferred Stock, other Awards or other investment vehicles, as the Committee shall determine or permit the Participant to elect.
(f) Bonus Stock and Awards in Lieu of Obligations. The Committee is authorized to grant Stock as a bonus, or to grant Stock or other Awards in lieu of obligations to pay cash or deliver other property under the Plan or under other plans or compensatory arrangements, provided that, in the case of Participants subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the amount of such grants remains within the discretion of the Committee to the extent necessary to ensure that acquisitions of Stock or other Awards are exempt from liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. Stock or Awards granted hereunder shall be subject to such other terms as shall be determined by the Committee. In the case of any grant of Stock to an officer of the Corporation in lieu of salary or other cash compensation, the number of shares granted in place of such compensation shall be reasonable, as determined by the Committee.
(g) Dividend Equivalents . Except with respect to Options and SARs, which shall not be eligible for Dividend Equivalents, the Committee is authorized to grant Dividend Equivalents to a Participant, entitling the Participant to receive cash, Stock, other Awards, or other property equal in value to dividends paid with respect to a specified number of shares of Stock, or other periodic payments. The Committee shall provide that Dividend Equivalents either shall accrue and be paid or distributed upon the vesting of an Award or shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Stock, Awards, or other investment vehicles and subject to such restrictions on transferability and risks of forfeiture as the Committee may specify.
(h) Other Stock-Based or Cash Awards . The Committee is authorized, subject to limitations under applicable law, to grant to Participants such other Awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Stock, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan, including, without limitation, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into Stock, purchase rights for Stock, Awards with value and payment contingent upon performance of the Corporation or any other factors designated by the Committee and Awards valued by reference to the book value of Stock or the value of securities of or the performance of specified subsidiaries. The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards. Stock delivered pursuant to an Award in the nature of a purchase right granted under this Section 6(h) shall be purchased for such consideration, paid for at such times, by such methods, and in such forms, including, without limitation, cash, Stock, other Awards, or other property, as the Committee shall determine. Cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other Award under the Plan, may also be granted pursuant to this Section 6(h).
A-6 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
7. Certain Provisions Applicable to Awards .
(a) Stand-Alone, Additional, Tandem and Substitute Awards. Awards granted under the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted at any time, either alone or in addition to, in tandem with, or in substitution or exchange for, any other Award or any award granted under another plan of the Corporation, any subsidiary, or any business entity to be acquired by the Corporation or a subsidiary, or any other right of a Participant to receive payment from the Corporation or any subsidiary, but if an Award is granted in substitution or exchange for another Award or award, the Committee shall require the surrender of such other Award or award in consideration for the grant of the new Award. In addition, Awards may be granted in lieu of cash compensation, including in lieu of cash amounts payable under other plans of the Corporation or any subsidiary, in which the value of Stock subject to the Award (for example, Deferred Stock or Restricted Stock) is equivalent in value to the cash compensation, provided, however, that any such Award that is an Option or SAR shall have an exercise price that is at least one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such Option or SAR. Notwithstanding the foregoing language of this Section 7(a), no outstanding Option or SAR may be amended to decrease the exercise price except in accordance with Section 11(c), and no outstanding Option or SAR may be surrendered in exchange for another Award or for cash.
(b) Term of Awards. The term of each Award shall be for such period as may be determined by the Committee; provided that in no event shall the term of any Option or SAR exceed a period of ten (10) years (or such shorter term as may be required in respect of an ISO under Code Section 422).
(c) Form and Timing of Payment under Awards; Deferrals. Subject to the terms of the Plan, including but not limited to Section 11(l), and any applicable Award agreement, (i) payments to be made by the Corporation or a subsidiary upon the exercise of an Option or other Award or settlement of an Award may be made in such forms as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, cash, Stock, other Awards or other property, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or on a deferred basis, (ii) the settlement of any Award may be accelerated, and cash paid in lieu of Stock in connection with such settlement, in the discretion of the Committee or upon occurrence of one or more specified events (in addition to a Change in Control), (iii) installment or deferred payments may be required by the Committee (subject to Section 11(e) of the Plan, including the consent provisions thereof in the case of any deferral of an outstanding Award not provided for in the original Award agreement) or permitted at the election of the Participant on terms and conditions established by the Committee, and (iv) payments may include, without limitation, provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable interest on installment or deferred payments or the grant or crediting of Dividend Equivalents or other amounts in respect of installment or deferred payments denominated in Stock.
(d) Exemptions from Section 16(b) Liability. It is the intent of the Corporation that the grant of any Awards to or other transaction by a Participant who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act shall be exempt under Rule 16b-3 (except for transactions acknowledged in writing to be non-exempt by such Participant). Accordingly, if any provision of this Plan or any Award agreement does not comply with the requirements of Rule 16b-3 as then applicable to any such transaction, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to the applicable requirements of Rule 16b-3 so that such Participant shall avoid liability under Section 16(b).
(e) Cancellation and Rescission of Awards. Unless the Award agreement specifies otherwise, the Committee may cancel any unexpired, unpaid, or deferred Awards at any time, and the Corporation shall have the additional rights set forth in Section 7(e)(iv) below, if the Participant is not in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Award agreement and the Plan including the following conditions:
(i) While employed by the Corporation or one of its subsidiaries, a Participant shall not render services for any organization or engage directly or indirectly in any business that, in the judgment of the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation or other senior officer designated by the Committee, is or becomes competitive with the Corporation.
(ii) A Participant shall not, without prior written authorization from the Corporation, disclose to anyone outside the Corporation, or use in other than the Corporations business, any confidential information or material relating to the business of the Corporation that is acquired by the Participant either during or after employment with the Corporation.
(iii) A Participant shall disclose promptly and assign to the Corporation all right, title, and interest in any invention or idea, patentable or not, made or conceived by the Participant during employment by the Corporation, relating in any manner to the actual or anticipated business, research or development work of the Corporation and shall do anything reasonably necessary to enable the Corporation to secure a patent where appropriate in the United States and in foreign countries.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-7 |
(iv) (A) Upon exercise, settlement, payment or delivery pursuant to an Award, the Participant shall certify on a form acceptable to the Committee that he or she is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Plan. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Section 7(e) prior to, or during the six (6) months after, any exercise, payment or delivery pursuant to an Award shall cause such exercise, payment or delivery to be rescinded. The Corporation shall notify the Participant in writing of any such rescission within two (2) years after such exercise, payment or delivery. Within ten (10) days after receiving such a notice from the Corporation, the Participant shall pay to the Corporation the amount of any gain realized or payment received as a result of the rescinded exercise, payment or delivery pursuant to an Award. Such payment shall be made either in cash or by returning to the Corporation the number of shares of Stock that the Participant received in connection with the rescinded exercise, payment or delivery.
(B) To the extent determined by the Committee, all Awards shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Corporations Recoupment Policy as it exists from time to time.
(f) Limitation of Vesting of Certain Awards. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock, Dividend Equivalents and Other Stock-Based Awards, as described in Sections 6(b), 6(c), 6(d), 6(e), 6(g) and 6(h) of the Plan, respectively, granted to employees, and Awards granted to directors as described in Section 8 of the Plan, will vest over a minimum period of three (3) years, except in the event of a Participants death or disability, or in the event of a Change in Control and (i) Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock, Dividend Equivalents and Other Stock-Based Awards as to which either the grant or the vesting is based on the achievement of one or more performance conditions will vest over a minimum period of one (1) year except in the event of a Participants death or disability, or in the event of a Change in Control, and (ii) up to five percent (5%) of the shares of Stock authorized under the Plan may be granted as Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock, Dividend Equivalents or Other Stock-Based Awards without any minimum vesting requirements. For purposes of this Section 7(f), vesting over a three (3)-year period will include periodic vesting over such period if the rate of such vesting is proportional throughout such period and in no event shall Awards subject to a minimum vesting period vest any earlier than one (1) year from the date of grant.
8. Special Rules for Directors .
(a) Awards; Per-Director Award Limitation. Eligible Directors may receive Awards, including without limitation Awards in respect of their annual retainer and any additional retainers for chairing the board or a committee of the board, or serving as lead independent director.
The maximum number of shares of Stock subject to Awards granted under the Plan during any one fiscal year to any one Eligible Director, taken together with any cash fees paid or Stock otherwise granted by the Company to such Eligible Director during such fiscal year for service as a non-employee director, will not exceed the following in total value (calculating the value of any such Awards based on the grant date fair value of such Awards for financial reporting purposes): (i) five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for each Eligible Director, and (ii) an additional five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the Eligible Director designated as independent chairman of the board or as lead independent director, in each such case including the value of any Awards in Stock that are received in lieu of all or a portion of any annual board chair, committee chair, or lead independent director cash retainers or similar cash-based payments and excluding, for this purpose, the value of any dividend equivalent payments paid pursuant to any Awards granted in a previous year.
(b) Deferral of Shares by Directors . Each Eligible Director may elect to defer the receipt of shares otherwise currently payable to such Eligible Director under Section 8(a) of this Plan until such Eligible Director terminates service as a director or such other date or event as permitted under rules established by the Board and uniformly applied. In that event, such Eligible Director shall be granted an award of share credits equal to the number of shares of Stock elected to be deferred, including fractional share credits to not less than three decimal places.
(c) Settlement. As soon as practicable after an Eligible Director has ceased being a Director of the Corporation or such other date or event elected by an Eligible Director under Section 8(b), all awards shall be paid to the Eligible Director or, in the case of the death of the Eligible Director, the Eligible Directors designated beneficiary or beneficiaries, or in the absence of a designated beneficiary, to the estate of the Eligible Director, in a single payment or installments as elected by the Eligible Director.
(d) Dividend Equivalents.
(i) In addition to the payment provided for in Section 8(c), each Eligible Director (or beneficiary) entitled to payment under this Section 8(d) shall receive at the same time the dividend equivalent amounts calculated under subsection (ii) below.
A-8 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
(ii) The dividend equivalent amount is the number of additional share credits attributable to the number of share credits originally granted plus additional share credits previously calculated hereunder. Such additional share credits shall be determined and credited as of each dividend payment date by dividing the aggregate cash dividends that would have been paid had share credits awarded or credited (but not yet paid) under this Section 8(d), as the case may be, been actual shares of Stock on the record date for such dividend by the Fair Market Value of Stock on the dividend payment date. Fractional share credits shall be calculated to not less than three decimal places.
(e) Payment; Fractional Shares. Payments pursuant to Sections 8(c) and 8(d) above shall be made in shares of Stock, except that there shall be paid in cash the value of any fractional share.
9. Performance and Annual Incentive Awards .
(a) Performance Conditions. The right of a Participant to exercise or receive a grant or settlement of any Award, and the timing thereof, may be subject to such performance conditions as may be specified by the Committee. The Committee may use such business criteria and other measures of performance as it may deem appropriate in establishing any performance conditions and may exercise its discretion to reduce or increase the amounts payable under any Award subject to performance conditions, except as limited under Sections 9(b) and 9(c) hereof in the case of a Performance Award or Annual Incentive Award intended to qualify under Code Section 162(m).
(b) Performance Awards Granted to Designated Covered Employees. If the Committee determines that a Performance Award to be granted to an Eligible Person who is designated by the Committee as likely to be a Covered Employee should qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Code Section 162(m), the grant, exercise and/or settlement of such Performance Award shall be contingent upon achievement of pre-established performance goals and other terms set forth in this Section 9(b).
(i) Performance Goals Generally. The performance goals for such Performance Awards shall consist of one or more business criteria and a targeted level or levels of performance with respect to each of such criteria, as specified by the Committee consistent with this Section 9(b). Performance goals shall be objective and shall otherwise meet the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder (including Regulation 1.162-27 and successor regulations thereto), including the requirement that the level or levels of performance targeted by the Committee result in the achievement of performance goals being substantially uncertain. The Committee may determine that such Performance Awards shall be granted, exercised and/or settled upon achievement of any one performance goal or that two or more of the performance goals must be achieved as a condition to grant, exercise and/or settlement of such Performance Awards. Performance goals may differ for Performance Awards granted to any one Participant or to different Participants.
(ii) Business Criteria. One or more of the following business criteria for the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, and/or for specified subsidiaries or business units of the Corporation (except with respect to the total stockholder return and earnings per share criteria), shall be used by the Committee in establishing performance goals for such Performance Awards: (1) earnings per share; (2) revenues; (3) cash flow; (4) cash flow return on investment; (5) return on net assets, return on assets, return on investment, return on capital, return on equity; (6) economic value added; (7) operating margin; (8) Common Knowledge Retail Customer Service score or a similar customer service measurement as measured by a third-party administrator; (9) Pharmacy Benefit Services Customer Satisfaction score; (10) net income; pretax earnings; pretax earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization; pretax operating earnings after interest expense and before incentives, service fees and extraordinary or special items; operating earnings; (11) total stockholder return; or (12) any of the above goals as compared to the performance of a published or special index deemed applicable by the Committee including, but not limited to, the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index or a group of comparator companies. One or more of the foregoing business criteria shall also be exclusively used in establishing performance goals for Annual Incentive Awards granted to a Covered Employee under Section 9(c) hereof.
(iii) Performance Period; Timing for Establishing Performance Goals. Achievement of performance goals in respect of such Performance Awards shall be measured over a performance period of at least one (1) year and up to ten (10) years, as specified by the Committee. Performance goals shall be established not later than ninety (90) days after the beginning of any performance period applicable to such Performance Awards, or at such other date as may be required or permitted for performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m).
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-9 |
(iv) Performance Award Pool. The Committee may establish a Performance Award pool, which shall be an unfunded pool, for purposes of measuring performance of the Corporation in connection with Performance Awards. The amount of such Performance Award pool shall be based upon the achievement of a performance goal or goals based on one or more of the business criteria set forth in Section 9(b)(ii) hereof during the given performance period, as specified by the Committee in accordance with Section 9(b)(iii) hereof. The Committee may specify the amount of the Performance Award pool as a percentage of any of such business criteria, a percentage thereof in excess of a threshold amount, or as another amount that need not bear a strictly mathematical relationship to such business criteria. The maximum amount payable to any Participant shall be a stated percentage of the pool; provided the sum of such percentages shall not exceed one hundred percent (100%) and the payment does not exceed the per-person award limit set forth in Section 5.
(v) Settlement of Performance Awards; Other Terms. Settlement of such Performance Awards shall be in cash, Stock, other Awards or other property, at the discretion of the Committee. The Committee may, in its discretion, reduce the amount of a settlement otherwise to be made in connection with such Performance Awards, but may not exercise discretion to increase any such amount payable to a Covered Employee in respect of a Performance Award subject to this Section 9(b). The Committee shall specify the circumstances in which such Performance Awards shall be paid or forfeited in the event of termination of employment of the Participant prior to the end of a performance period or settlement of Performance Awards.
(c) Annual Incentive Awards Granted to Designated Covered Employees. If the Committee determines that an Annual Incentive Award to be granted to an Eligible Person who is designated by the Committee as likely to be a Covered Employee should qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Code Section 162(m), the grant, exercise and/or settlement of such Annual Incentive Award shall be contingent upon achievement of pre-established performance goals and other terms set forth in this Section 9(c).
(i) Annual Incentive Award Pool. The Committee may establish an Annual Incentive Award pool, which shall be an unfunded pool, for purposes of measuring performance of the Corporation in connection with Annual Incentive Awards. The amount of such Annual Incentive Award pool shall be based upon the achievement of a performance goal or goals based on one or more of the business criteria set forth in Section 9(b)(ii) hereof during the given performance period, as specified by the Committee in accordance with Section 9(b)(iii) hereof. The Committee may specify the amount of the Annual Incentive Award pool as a percentage of any of such business criteria, a percentage thereof in excess of a threshold amount, or as another amount that need not bear a strictly mathematical relationship to such business criteria. The maximum amount payable to any Participant shall be a stated percentage of the pool; provided the sum of such percentages shall not exceed one hundred percent (100%) and the payment does not exceed the per-person award limit set forth in Section 5.
(ii) Potential Annual Incentive Awards. Not later than the end of the ninetieth (90th) day of each fiscal year, or at such other date as may be required or permitted in the case of Awards intended to be performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), the Committee shall determine the Eligible Persons who will potentially receive Annual Incentive Awards, and the amounts potentially payable thereunder, for that fiscal year, either out of an Annual Incentive Award pool established by such date under Section 9(c)(i) hereof or as individual Annual Incentive Awards. In the case of individual Annual Incentive Awards intended to qualify under Code Section 162(m), the amount potentially payable shall be based upon the achievement of a performance goal or goals based on one or more of the business criteria set forth in Section 9(b)(ii) hereof in the given performance year, as specified by the Committee; in other cases, such amount shall be based on such criteria as shall be established by the Committee. In all cases, the maximum Annual Incentive Award of any Participant shall be subject to the limitation set forth in Section 5 hereof.
(iii) Payout of Annual Incentive Awards. After the end of each fiscal year, the Committee shall determine the amount, if any, of (A) the Annual Incentive Award pool, and the maximum amount of potential Annual Incentive Award payable to each Participant in the Annual Incentive Award pool, or (B) the amount of potential Annual Incentive Award otherwise payable to each Participant. The Committee may, in its discretion, determine that the amount payable to any Participant as a final Annual Incentive Award shall be increased or reduced from the amount of his or her potential Annual Incentive Award, including a determination to make no final Award whatsoever, but may not exercise discretion to increase any such amount in the case of an Annual Incentive Award intended to qualify under Code Section 162(m). The Committee shall specify the circumstances in which an Annual Incentive Award shall be paid or forfeited in the event of termination of employment by the Participant prior to the end of a fiscal year or settlement of such Annual Incentive Award.
A-10 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
(d) Written Determinations . All determinations by the Committee as to the establishment of performance goals, the amount of any Performance Award pool or potential individual Performance Awards and as to the achievement of performance goals relating to Performance Awards under Section 9(b), and the amount of any Annual Incentive Award pool or potential individual Annual Incentive Awards and the amount of final Annual Incentive Awards under Section 9(c), shall be made in writing in the case of any Award intended to qualify under Code Section 162(m). The Committee may not delegate any responsibility relating to such Performance Awards or Annual Incentive Awards.
(e) Status of Section 9(b) and Section 9(c) Awards under Code Section 162(m) . It is the intent of the Corporation that Performance Awards and Annual Incentive Awards under Sections 9(b) and 9(c) hereof granted to persons who are designated by the Committee as likely to be Covered Employees within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder (including Regulation 1.162-27 and successor regulations thereto) shall, if so designated by the Committee, constitute performance-based compensation within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, the terms of Sections 9(b) through (e), including the definitions of Covered Employee and other terms used therein, shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder. The foregoing notwithstanding, because the Committee cannot determine with certainty whether a given Participant will be a Covered Employee with respect to a fiscal year that has not yet been completed, the term Covered Employee as used herein shall mean only a person designated by the Committee, at the time of grant of Performance Awards or an Annual Incentive Award, as likely to be a Covered Employee with respect to that fiscal year. If any provision of the Plan as in effect on the date of adoption or any agreements relating to Performance Awards or Annual Incentive Awards that are designated as intended to comply with Code Section 162(m) does not comply or is inconsistent with the requirements of Code Section 162(m) or regulations thereunder, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements.
10. Change in Control.
(a) Effect of Change in Control. In the event that a Participant experiences a Termination Without Cause or a Constructive Termination Without Cause within two (2) years following a Change in Control, the following provisions shall apply unless otherwise provided in the Award agreement:
(i) Within two (2) years of a Change in Control, any Award carrying a right to exercise that was not previously exercisable and vested shall become fully exercisable and vested upon a Termination Without Cause or a Constructive Termination Without Cause and shall remain exercisable and vested for the balance of the stated term of such Award without regard to any termination of employment by the Participant, subject only to applicable restrictions set forth in Section 11(a) hereof;
(ii) Within two (2) years of a Change in Control, the restrictions, deferral of settlement and forfeiture conditions applicable to any other Award granted under the Plan shall lapse and such Awards shall be deemed fully vested upon a Termination Without Cause or a Constructive Termination Without Cause, except to the extent of any waiver by the Participant and subject to applicable restrictions set forth in Section 11(a) hereof; and
(iii) With respect to any outstanding Award subject to achievement of performance goals and conditions under the Plan, such performance goals and other conditions will be deemed to be met at actual performance or prorated as of the date of termination.
(b) Definition of Change in Control. A Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred if:
(i) any Person (other than (w) the Corporation, (x) any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under any employee benefit plan of the Corporation, (y) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Corporation immediately after the occurrence with respect to which the evaluation is being made in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the common stock of the Corporation immediately prior to such occurrence, or (z) any surviving or resulting entity from a merger or consolidation referred to in clause (iii) below that does not constitute a Change in Control under clause (iii) below) becomes the Beneficial Owner (except that a Person shall be deemed to be the Beneficial Owner of all shares that any such Person has the right to acquire pursuant to any agreement or arrangement or upon exercise of conversion rights, warrants or options or otherwise, without regard to the sixty (60) day period referred to in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), as directly or indirectly, of securities of the Corporation or of any subsidiary owning directly or indirectly all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of the Corporation (a Significant Subsidiary), representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of the Corporations or such Significant Subsidiarys then outstanding securities;
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-11 |
(ii) during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new director whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Corporations stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the twelve (12)-month period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;
(iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Corporation or any Significant Subsidiary with any other entity, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Corporation or a Significant Subsidiary outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving or resulting entity) more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the surviving or resulting entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or
(iv) the consummation of a transaction (or series of transactions within a twelve (12)-month period) which constitutes the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of the Corporation but in no event assets having a gross fair market value of less than forty percent (40%) of the total gross fair market value of all of the consolidated assets of the Corporation (other than such a sale or disposition immediately after which such assets will be owned directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Corporation in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the common stock of the Corporation immediately prior to such sale or disposition.
(c) Definition of Termination Without Cause and Constructive Termination Without Cause.
(i) Termination Without Cause shall mean the involuntary termination of a Participants employment by the Corporation or a subsidiary without Cause.
(ii) Constructive Termination Without Cause shall mean the Participants termination of his or her employment following the occurrence, without the Participants written consent, of one or more of (A) an assignment of any duties to the Participant that is materially inconsistent with Participants position, (B) a material decrease in Participants annual base salary or target annual incentive award opportunity, or (C) a relocation of Participants principal place of employment more than thirty-five (35) miles from Participants place of employment before such relocation. In all cases, no Constructive Termination Without Cause shall be deemed to have occurred if any such event occurs as a result of a prior termination. In addition, no Constructive Termination Without Cause shall be deemed to have occurred unless the Participant provides written notice to the Corporation that any such event has occurred, which notice identifies the event and is provided within thirty (30) days of the initial occurrence of such event, a cure period of forty-five (45) days following the Corporations receipt of such notice expires and the Corporation has not cured such event within such cure period, and the Participant actually terminates his/her employment within thirty (30) days of the expiration of the cure period.
(iii) Cause shall be deemed to occur if the Participant (A) willfully and materially breaches any of his or her obligations to the Corporation with respect to confidentiality, cooperation with regard to litigation, non-disparagement and non-solicitation; (B) is convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude; or (C) engages in conduct that constitutes willful gross neglect or willful gross misconduct in carrying out Participants duties to the Corporation, resulting, in either case, in material harm to the financial condition or reputation of the Corporation.
11. General Provisions.
(a) Compliance with Legal and Other Requirements. The Corporation may, to the extent deemed necessary or advisable by the Committee, postpone the issuance or delivery of Stock or payment of other benefits under any Award until completion of such registration or qualification of such Stock or other required action under any federal or state law, rule or regulation, listing or other required action with respect to any stock exchange or automated quotation system upon which the Stock or other securities of the Corporation are listed or quoted, or compliance with any other obligation of the Corporation, as the Committee may consider appropriate, and may require any Participant to make such representations, furnish such information and comply with or be subject to such other conditions as it may consider appropriate in connection with the issuance or delivery of Stock or payment of other benefits in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations, listing requirements, or other obligations. The foregoing notwithstanding, in connection with a Change in Control, the Corporation shall take or cause to be taken no action, and shall undertake or permit to arise no legal or contractual obligation, that results or would result in any postponement of the issuance or delivery of Stock or payment of benefits under any Award or the imposition of any other conditions on such issuance, delivery or payment, to the extent that such postponement or other condition would represent a greater burden on a Participant than existed on the ninetieth (90 th ) day preceding the Change in Control.
A-12 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
(b) Limits on Transferability; Beneficiaries. No Award or other right or interest of a Participant under the Plan shall be pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or subject to any lien, obligation or liability of such Participant to any party (other than the Corporation or a subsidiary), or assigned or transferred by such Participant otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or to a Beneficiary upon the death of a Participant, and such Awards or rights that may be exercisable shall be exercised during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant or his or her guardian or legal representative, except that Awards and other rights (other than ISOs in tandem therewith) may be transferred (without receipt of value from the transferee) to one or more Beneficiaries, family members or other permitted transferees designated by the Committee during the lifetime of the Participant, and may be exercised by such transferees in accordance with the terms of such Award, but only if and to the extent such transfers are permitted by the Committee pursuant to the express terms of an Award agreement (subject to any terms and conditions which the Committee may impose thereon). A Beneficiary, transferee, or other person claiming any rights under the Plan from or through any Participant shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the Plan and any Award agreement applicable to such Participant, except as otherwise determined by the Committee, and to any additional terms and conditions deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee.
(c) Adjustments. In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Stock, or other property), recapitalization, forward or reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange, liquidation, dissolution or other similar corporate transaction or event affects the Stock such that an adjustment is determined by the Committee to be appropriate under the Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust any or all of (i) the number and kind of shares of Stock which may be delivered in connection with Awards granted thereafter, (ii) the number and kind of shares of Stock by which annual per-person Award limitations are measured under Section 5 hereof, (iii) the number and kind of shares of Stock subject to or deliverable in respect of outstanding Awards, and (iv) the exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any Award and/or make provision for payment of cash or other property in respect of any outstanding Award. In addition, the Committee is authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards (including Performance Awards and performance goals, and Annual Incentive Awards and any Annual Incentive Award pool or performance goals relating thereto) in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, events described in the preceding sentence, as well as acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets) affecting the Corporation, any subsidiary or any business unit, or the financial statements of the Corporation or any subsidiary, or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, tax rates and regulations or business conditions or in view of the Committees assessment of the business strategy of the Corporation, any subsidiary or business unit thereof, performance of comparable organizations, economic and business conditions, personal performance of a Participant, and any other circumstances deemed relevant; provided that no such adjustment shall be authorized or made if and to the extent that such authority or the making of such adjustment would cause Performance Awards granted under Section 9(b) hereof or Annual Incentive Awards granted under Section 9(c) hereof to Participants designated by the Committee as Covered Employees and intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder to otherwise fail to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder.
(d) Taxes. The Corporation and any subsidiary is authorized to withhold from any Award granted, any payment relating to an Award under the Plan, including from a distribution of Stock, or any payroll or other payment to a Participant, amounts of withholding and other taxes required to be withheld by the applicable employment tax rules in connection with any transaction involving an Award, and to take such other action as the Committee may deem advisable to enable the Corporation to satisfy obligations for the payment of withholding taxes relating to any Award. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee shall be entitled to deduct and withhold additional amounts so long as such additional deductions would not cause an Award classified as equity under applicable accounting principles and standards to be classified as a liability award under such principles and standards. The Committees authority shall also include authority to withhold or receive Stock or other property and to make cash payments in respect thereof in satisfaction of such withholding tax obligations.
(e) Changes to the Plan and Awards. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Plan or the Committees authority to grant Awards under the Plan without the consent of stockholders or Participants, except that any amendment or alteration to the Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Corporations stockholders not later than the annual meeting next following such Board action if such stockholder approval is required by any federal or state law or regulation or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the Stock may then be listed or quoted, or if the amendment increases the number of shares of Stock reserved and available for delivery in connection with Awards, materially modifies the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, or materially increases the benefits accruing to Participants, and the Board may otherwise, in its discretion, determine to submit other such changes to the Plan to stockholders for approval;
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-13 |
provided that, without the consent of an affected Participant, no such Board action may materially and adversely affect the rights of such Participant under any previously granted and outstanding Award, except to the extent the Committee considers such amendment necessary or advisable to comply with any law, regulation, ruling, judicial decision, accounting standards, regulatory guidance or other legal requirement. Subject to the provisions of Section 7(a) the Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate any Award theretofore granted and any Award agreement relating thereto, except as otherwise provided in the Plan; provided that, without the consent of an affected Participant, no such Committee action may materially and adversely affect the rights of such Participant under such Award.
(f) Limitation on Rights Conferred under Plan. Neither the Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as (i) giving any Eligible Person or Participant the right to continue as an Eligible Person or Participant or in the employ or service of the Corporation or a subsidiary, (ii) interfering in any way with the right of the Corporation or a subsidiary to terminate any Eligible Persons or Participants employment or service at any time, (iii) giving an Eligible Person or Participant any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan or to be treated uniformly with other Participants and employees, or (iv) conferring on a Participant any of the rights of a stockholder of the Corporation unless and until the Participant is duly issued or transferred shares of Stock in accordance with the terms of an Award.
(g) Unfunded Status of Awards; Creation of Trusts. The Plan is intended to constitute an unfunded plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant or obligation to deliver Stock pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Corporation; provided that the Committee may authorize the creation of trusts and deposit therein cash, Stock, other Awards or other property, or make other arrangements to meet the Corporations obligations under the Plan. Such trusts or other arrangements shall be consistent with the unfunded status of the Plan unless the Committee otherwise determines with the consent of each affected Participant. The trustee of such trusts may be authorized to dispose of trust assets and reinvest the proceeds in alternative investments, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may specify and in accordance with applicable law.
(h) Non-exclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the Plan by the Board nor its submission to the stockholders of the Corporation for approval shall be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board or a committee thereof to adopt such other incentive arrangements as it may deem desirable including incentive arrangements and awards which do not qualify under Code Section 162(m).
(i) Payments in the Event of Forfeitures; Fractional Shares . Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event of a forfeiture of an Award with respect to which a Participant paid cash or other consideration, the Participant shall be repaid the amount of such cash or other consideration. No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, other Awards or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
(j) Governing Law . The validity, construction and effect of the Plan, any rules and regulations under the Plan, and any Award agreement shall be determined in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws, and applicable federal law.
(k) Recoupment . Each Award under the Plan shall be subject to the terms of the Corporations Recoupment Policy, and to such other recoupment policies or provisions as may be required under the terms of any agreement between the Corporation and any regulatory authority or as may be required under applicable law.
(l) Code Section 409A . With respect to Awards subject to Code Section 409A, the Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A, and the provisions hereof shall be interpreted in a manner that satisfies the requirements of Code Section 409A and the related regulations, and the Plan shall be operated accordingly. If any provision of the Plan or any term or condition of any Award would otherwise frustrate or conflict with this intent, the provision, term or condition will be interpreted and deemed amended so as to avoid this conflict. The Committee may not accelerate the payment or settlement of any Award that constitutes a deferral of compensation for purposes of Code Section 409A except to the extent such acceleration would not result in the Participant incurring interest or additional tax under Code Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, if a Participant is determined under rules adopted by the Committee to be a specified employee within the meaning of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) and as defined in the Corporations Universal 409A Definition Document, payment under any Award hereunder shall be delayed to the extent necessary to avoid a violation of Code Section 409A.
A-14 |
|
2017 Proxy Statement |
(m) Plan Effective Date and Stockholder Approval; Expiration Date . The Plan has been initially adopted by the Board on March 2, 2017, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Corporation, in accordance with applicable law. The Plan will become effective on the date of such approval. Unless an extension is approved by the stockholders of the Corporation, the Plan shall have a term that expires on May 9, 2027, after which no further Awards may be made, provided, however, that the provisions of the Plan shall continue to apply to Awards made prior to such date.
cvshealthannualmeeting.com |
|
A-15 |
2016 CSR Achievements |
Prescription for a Better
World
|
|
Awards &
|
||||
100 Best Corporate Citizens,
Americas Greenest Companies (#16)
Sustainability Index
Change the World List
|
Most Admired Companies
(#27)
FTSE4Good Index
Corporate Equality Index
|
90/100 Disability Equality Index
score
25 Noteworthy Companies
Americas Top 50 Organizations for
Multicultural Business
|
|||
|
Health
|
||||
Project Health
$117M
888,000
101,000
|
Tobacco
#BeTheFirst
20 grants
|
Prescription Drug Abuse
170,000+
56.7 tons
|
|||
|
Planet
|
|
Leader
|
|||||
100%
|
$2.5M
in value of employee volunteer hours provided to communities |
$1B
target of spending on diverse Tier I suppliers, achieved |
60,000+
underserved young people introduced to careers in health care |
|
CVS HEALTH
CORPORATION
|
|
||||||
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above |
||||||
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. | ||||||
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS | ||||||
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. | ||||||
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 | ||||||
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. | ||||||
VOTE BY MAIL | ||||||
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION | |||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote
FOR
the following proposal: |
|
1. | Election of Directors | ||||||||
Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | ||||||
1a. | Richard M. Bracken | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1b. | C. David Brown II | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1c. | Alecia A. DeCoudreaux | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1d. | Nancy-Ann M. DeParle | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1e. | David W. Dorman | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1f. | Anne M. Finucane | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1g. | Larry J. Merlo | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1h. | Jean-Pierre Millon | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1i. | Mary L. Schapiro | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1j. | Richard J. Swift | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1k. | William C. Weldon | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
1l. | Tony L. White | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | ||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important Notice Regarding the
Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available
at
www.proxyvote.com and at
www.cvshealthannualmeeting.com.
E24740-P85844 |
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
May 10, 2017, 9:00
AM
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Larry J. Merlo and David W. Dorman, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of CVS HEALTH CORPORATION that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:00 AM, EDT, on May 10, 2017 at the CVS Health Customer Support Center, One CVS Drive, Woonsocket, RI 02895, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Additional Voting Instructions for Certain CVS Health Employees: To the extent the undersigned is a participant in the 401(k) Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan of CVS Health Corporation and Affiliated Companies (the "Plan"), the undersigned hereby instructs The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee under the Plan, to vote as indicated on the reverse side, all shares of CVS Health Common Stock held in the Plan, as to which the undersigned would be entitled to give voting instructions if present at the Meeting. Shares held under the Plan for which voting instructions are not properly completed or signed, or received in a timely manner (no later than noon EDT on May 8, 2017), will be voted in the same proportion as those shares for which voting instructions were properly completed and signed and received in a timely manner, so long as such vote is in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. All votes will be kept confidential by the trustee.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations.
Address Changes/Comments: | |
Continued and to be signed on reverse side