As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2009

Registration Statement No. 333-___________
 


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
==================================
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
==================================
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

Wyoming
2820
83-0459707
(State of Incorporation)
(Primary Standard Classification Code)
(IRS Employer ID No.)
 
120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805,
Lansing, Michigan 48933
(517) 336-0807
  (Address and Telephone Number of Registrant’s Principal
Executive Offices and Principal Place of Business)
 
Kim Thompson, CEO
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805,
Lansing, Michigan 48933
(517) 336-0807
 (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Agent for Service)
 
Copies of communications to:
Fox Law Offices, P.A.
131 Court Street, # 11
Exeter, NH 03833
(603) 778-9910
 
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x
 
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration Statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
     
Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer   o (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company x
 
 

 
 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class Of Securities to be Registered
 
Amount to be
Registered (1)
   
Proposed Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price
per share (2)
   
Proposed Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price (3)
   
Amount of
Registration fee
 
                         
Class A Common Stock, no par value
    88,500,000     $ 0.0165     $ 1,460,250     $ 81.48  
  
(1) In the event of a stock split, stock dividend, or similar transaction involving the common stock, the number of shares registered shall automatically be increased to cover the additional shares of common stock issuable pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act.  The amount of shares to be registered represents the Company’s good faith estimate of the number of shares that the registrant may issued pursuant to a Letter Agreement with the selling security holder.

(2) The proposed maximum offering price per share and the proposed maximum aggregate offering price have been estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the registration fee in accordance with Rules 457(c) and 457(h) under the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis of the average of the high and low prices of the Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on September 28, 2009, a date within five (5) trading days prior to the date of the filing of this Registration Statement.

(3) This amount represents the maximum aggregate market value of common stock which may be put to the selling shareholder by the registrant pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Letter Agreement between the selling shareholder and the registrant.
 
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the securities act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and no offer to buy these securities is being solicited in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
 
PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 2, 2009
 
PROSPECTUS
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
88,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
 
This prospectus relates to the resale of up to 88,500,000 shares of the common stock of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, which shares will be offered and sold by the selling shareholder, Calm Seas Capital, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Calm Seas”), pursuant to a “put right” under a letter agreement for an Equity Line of Credit, that we entered into with Calm Seas on July 17, 2009 (the “Letter Agreement”). The Letter Agreement permits us to “put” up to an aggregate of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in shares of our Class A common stock to Calm Seas during a two year period ending on  the second anniversary of the effective date of the registration statement in which this prospectus is contained.  We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares of our Class A common stock.  However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of securities pursuant to our exercise of the put right offered by Clams Seas under the Letter Agreement.  We will bear all costs associated with this registration.
 
Calm Seas is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in connection with the resale of our Class A common stock sold to it by our exercise of the put right under the Letter Agreement.  Each month we may put up to $75,000 of our Class A common stock to Calm Seas, which will purchase such shares at a price per share equal to 80% of the lowest closing bid price of our Class A common stock during the five consecutive trading days immediately following the date the notice of our election to put shares pursuant to the Letter Agreement is delivered to Clam Seas (the date of delivery of such notice is referred to as the “put date”).  Notwithstanding the $75,000 ceiling for each monthly put, if both we and Calm Seas agree, we may submit one or more additional puts during any given month to the extent we need additional capital for our operations and/or our product development.  We can only submit such additional put(s) if Calm Seas Capital agrees to it.  Furthermore, the additional put is subject to the $1,000,000 limitation of this offering.  The additional put allows us to obtain additional capital in the event that our product development proceeds quicker than we expect.
 
We will automatically withdraw our put notice to Calm Seas if the lowest closing bid price used to determine the purchase price of the put shares is not at least equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the average closing “bid” price for our Class A common stock for the ten (10) trading days prior to the put date.
 
Our shares of Class A common stock are traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) under the symbol “KBLB” On September 28, 2009, the closing sale price of our common stock was $0.016 per share.
 
This investment involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase shares only if you can afford a complete loss. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 5.
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805, Lansing, Michigan 48933.  Our telephone number is (517) 336-0807.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
 
The Date of This Prospectus Is:  _______ __, 2009
 
  
 
      


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
PAGE
2
3
5
12
13
14
15
16
17
20
20
21
21
F-
22
27
27
28
30
30
31
 
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus.  We have not, and the selling security holder has not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information.  If anyone provides you with different information, you should not rely on it.  We are not, and the selling security holder is not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.  You should assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus.  Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. In this prospectus, “Kraig”, “Kraig Biocraft” “KBLB”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, unless the context otherwise requires.

 
 
 
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus.  This summary does not contain all the information that you should consider before investing in the common stock.  You should carefully read the entire prospectus, including “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements, before making an investment decision   .
 
About Our Company

We are Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Wyoming on April 25, 2006.  We were organized to develop high strength, protein-based fibers, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in both the specialty fiber and technical textile industries.  Specialty fibers are engineered for specific uses that require exceptional strength, heat resistance and/or chemical resistance.  The specialty fiber market is dominated by two synthetic fiber products:  aramid fibers and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fiber.  Examples of these synthetic fibers include Kevlar® and Spectra®.  The technical textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g., sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g., high-strength composite materials).

We have collaboration agreements with University of Notre Dame and the University of Wyoming that give us the exclusive use of certain intellectual property for developing transgenic silkworms to produce spider silk fibers in commercially viable quantities.  We are using these genetic engineering technologies to develop fibers with greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our target markets, namely the specialty fiber and technical textile industries.  Our agreement with the University of Notre Dame has lapsed but we are in the process of renewing that agreement which we expect will be renewed in October 2009 on substantially the same terms.

We are currently in the first stage of our development, which is to develop a transgenic silkworm that can produce a natural spider silk fiber by inserting patented genetic sequences into ordinary silkworms using patented genetic engineering technology under our license and collaboration agreements with the University of Norte Dame and the University of Wyoming.  The proceeds from the offering, as described below, will be used to fund this first stage, which we expect to complete by October 1, 2011

As of the date of this prospectus, we have not generated any revenues from our development activities.  To date, we have generated an accumulated deficit of $1.59 million.

Where You Can Find Us

Our principal executive office location and mailing address is 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805, Lansing, Michigan 48933.  Our corporate telephone number is (517) 336-0807

The Offering

This prospectus relates to the resale of up to 88,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued to Calm Seas pursuant to a “put right” under a letter agreement for an Equity Line of Credit, that we entered into with Calm Seas on July 17, 2009 as amended on September 14, 2009 (together, as amended, the “Letter Agreement”).

For the purpose of determining the number of shares of common stock to be offered by this prospectus, we have assumed that we will issue not more than 88,500,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of our put right under the Letter Agreement, although the number of shares that we will actually issue pursuant to that put right may be more or less than 88,500,000, depending on the trading price of our Class A common stock.  

The Letter Agreement with Calm Seas provides that over a 24 month period we may put to Calm Seas up to an aggregate of $1,000,000 in shares of our Class A common stock for a purchase price equal to 80% of the lowest closing “bid” price of our Class A common stock during the five consecutive trading days immediately following the date we deliver notice to Calm Seas of our election to put shares pursuant to the Letter Agreement.  We may only put shares at the beginning of each calendar month, unless Calm Seas accepts an additional put (as described below).  The dollar value that we will be permitted to put each month pursuant to the Letter Agreement will be the lesser of: (A) the product of (i) 200% of the average daily volume in the US market of our Class A common stock for the ten trading days prior to the date we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas multiplied by (ii) the average of the daily closing prices for the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding the date we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas, or (B) $75,000.  We will automatically withdraw our put notice to Calm Seas if the lowest closing bid price used to determine the purchase price of the put shares is not at least equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the average closing “bid” price for our Class A common stock for the ten (10) trading days prior to the date we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas.
 
 
 
On the seventh business day after we deliver our put notice to it, Calm Seas will purchase the number of shares share set forth in the put notice at the dollar value set forth in the put notice by delivering such amount to us by wire transfer.

Notwithstanding the $75,000 ceiling for each monthly put, as described above, we may at any time request Calm Seas to purchase shares in excess of such ceiling, either as a part of a monthly put or as an additional put(s) during such month.  If Calm Seas, in its sole discretion, accepts such request to purchase additional shares, then we may include the put for additional shares in our monthly put request or submit an additional put for such additional shares in accordance with the procedure set forth above.

Calm Seas has indicated that it will resell those shares in the open market, resell our shares to other investors through negotiated transactions, or hold our shares in its portfolio.  This prospectus covers the resale of our stock by Calm Seas either in the open market or to other investors through negotiated transactions. Calm Seas’ obligations under the Letter Agreement are not transferrable and this registration statement does not cover sales of our common stock by transferees of Calm Seas.

Except as described above, there are no other conditions that must be met in order for Calm Seas to be obligated to purchase the shares set forth in the put notice.

The Letter Agreement will terminate when any of the following events occur:

·
Calm Seas has purchased an aggregate of $1,000,000 of our Class A common stock; or

·
The second anniversary of the effective date of the registration statement covering our equity line of credit with Calm Seas.
 
As we draw down on the Equity Line of Credit, shares of our Class A common stock will be sold into the market by Calm Seas.  The sale of these additional shares could cause our stock price to decline.  In turn, if the stock price declines and we issue more puts, more shares will come into the market, which could cause a further drop in the stock price.  You should be aware that there is an inverse relationship between the market price of our Class A common stock and the number of shares to be issued under the Equity Line of Credit.  If our stock price declines, we will be required to issue a greater number of shares under the Equity Line of Credit.  We have no obligation to utilize the full amount available under the Equity Line of Credit.

Terms of the Offering

Class A common stock offered:
Up to 88,500,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to be offered for resale by Calm Seas.
   
Class A common stock to be outstanding
before this offering:
513,377,924 shares
   
Common stock to be outstanding
after this offering:
601,877,924 shares
   
Use of proceeds:
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of Class A common stock. However, we will receive proceeds from the Equity Line of Credit.  See “Use of Proceeds”.  
   
Risk factors:
An investment in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5 of this prospectus.
   
OTC Bulletin Board symbol:
“KBLB”
 
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following table provides summary financial statement data of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.  The interim financial data for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 and for the period April 25, 2006 (date of inception) to June 30, 2009 are unaudited. The financial statement data for the year ended December 31, 2008 has been derived from our audited financial statements. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our financial statements and the related notes included in this prospectus, and the unaudited financial statements and related notes included in this prospectus.
 
 
 
  
   
For the Six Months 
Ended
June 30, 2009
   
For the Year
 Ended
December 31, 2008
   
From Inception
through
June 30, 2009
 
   
(Unaudited)
   
(Audited)
   
(Unaudited)
 
                     
Net Sales
 
$
--
   
$
--
   
$
--
 
                         
Total Operating Expenses
 
$
218,176
   
$
355,647
   
$
1,576,354
 
                         
Loss from Operations
 
$
(218,176)
     
(355,647
)
 
$
(1,576,354)
 
                         
Net loss
 
$
(236,368)
   
$
(306,104
 
$
(1,599,779
)
                         
Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted
 
$
(0.00)
   
$
(0.01)
         
 
   
As of
June 30, 2009
   
As of 
December31,
2008
 
  BALANCE SHEET DATA:
 
(Unaudited)
   
(Audited)
 
             
Cash
  $ 5,402     $ 9,537  
                 
Total assets
  $ 13,567     $ 12,660  
                 
Total liabilities – related party
  $ 617,440     $ 468,278  
                 
Total liabilities (all current)
  $ 763,236     $ 550,961  
                 
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
  $ (749,669 )   $ (538,301 )
                                                                                                 
                   

 
RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this prospectus before investing in our common stock. If any of the following risks occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed. Please note that throughout this prospectus, the words “we”, “our” or “us” refer to the Company and its subsidiary not to the selling stockholders.
 
Risk Related to Our Company
 
We may not successfully manage any growth that we may experience.
 
Our future success will depend upon not only product development but also on the expansion of our operations and the effective management of any such growth, which will place a significant strain on our management and on our administrative, operational, and financial resources. To manage any such growth, we must expand our facilities, augment our operational, financial and management systems, and hire and train additional qualified personnel. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our business would be harmed as our growth could be adversely affected by such mismanagement.
 
Our initial development of recombinant silk fiber from the transgenic silkworm and other product development programs depend upon third-party researchers who are outside our control.
 
We depend upon independent researchers and collaborators, such as universities and their staff, to conduct our development of a transgenic silkworm and recombinant silk polymers, such as spider silk.  Such researchers and collaborators perform services under agreements with us. Such agreements are often standard-form agreements typically not subject to extensive negotiation.  These researchers or collaborators are not our employees, and in general we cannot control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our product development programs.  These researchers and collaborators may not assign as great a priority to our programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs ourselves. If outside collaborators fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our transgenic silkworm development and our product development programs, or if their performance is substandard, our introduction of protein based fiber products will be delayed or may not result at all.  These researchers and collaborators may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of whom may compete with us.
 
If conflicts arise with our collaborators, they may act in their self-interests, which may be adverse to our interests.
 
Conflicts may arise in our collaborations we have entered into or may enter into due to one or more of the following:
 
·  
disputes with respect to payments that we believe are due under a collaboration agreement;

·  
disagreements with respect to ownership of intellectual property rights;

·  
unwillingness on the part of a collaborator to keep us informed regarding the progress of its development and commercialization activities, or to permit public disclosure of these activities;

·  
delay of a collaborator’s development or commercialization efforts with respect to our product development; or

·  
termination or non-renewal of the collaboration.
  
In addition, in our collaborations, we may be required to agree not to conduct independently, or with any third party, any research that is competitive with the research conducted under our collaborations. Our collaborations may have the effect of limiting the areas of research that we may pursue, either alone or with others. Our collaborators, however, may be able to develop, either alone or with others, products in related fields that are competitive with the products or potential products that are the subject of these collaborations.
 
If we lose the services of key management personnel, we may not be able to execute our business strategy effectively.
 
Our future success depends in a large part upon the continued service of our founder and sole officer and director, Kim Thompson.  Mr. Thompson is critical to our overall management as well as the development of our technology, our culture and our strategic direction.  We do not maintain a key-person life insurance policy on Mr. Thompson.  The loss of Mr. Thompson would materially harm our business. 
 

 
As our business grows, we will need to hire highly skilled personnel and, if we are unable to retain or motivate hire additional qualified personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.
 
Our performance will be largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals.  Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our company.  Despite the current economic conditions, competition in our industry for qualified employees remains intense as the skills we require in our employees are highly specialized.  We compete with companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries that seek to retain scientists with genetic engineering experience and expertise.  Competition for qualified individuals remains intense despite the current economic conditions, which have somewhat softened demand for qualified personnel.  However, we expect that over the longer term we will continue to face stiff competition and may not be able to successfully recruit or retain such personnel. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel will be critical to our success.

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market any products we may develop, we may not be able to generate product revenue.
 
We do not currently have an organization for the sales, marketing and distribution of any fiber products that we expect to develop.  In order to market any products that may be develop, we must build our sales, marketing, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services. In addition, we have no experience in developing, training or managing a sales force and will incur substantial additional expenses in doing so.  The cost of establishing and maintaining a sales force may exceed its cost effectiveness.  Furthermore, we will compete with many companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations.  Our marketing and sales efforts may be unable to compete successfully against these companies.  If we are unable to establish adequate sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, whether independently or with third parties, we may not be able to generate product revenue and may not become profitable.

We are a development stage company, and we may be unable to generate significant revenues and may never become profitable.
 
We are a development stage company that has not generated any revenues to date.  We expect to incur significant research and development costs for the foreseeable future.  We may not be able to successfully achieve a transgenic silkworm and/or successfully market fiber products we produce in the future that will generate significant revenues.  In addition, any revenues that we may generate may be insufficient for us to become profitable.
 
In particular, potential investors should be aware that we have not proven that we can:
 
·  
raise sufficient additional capital in the public and/or private markets to continue the development of the transgenic silkworm, demonstrate the ability to produce commercial volumes of recombinant silk fibers or product effective polymer fibers using such recombinant silk fibers;

·  
develop and manufacture specialty fibers achieve market acceptance;

·  
develop and maintain relationships with key vendors that will be necessary to optimize the market value of the fibers we develop;

·  
maintain relationships with strategic partners that will be necessary to manufacture the fibers we develop or develop relationships with potential strategic partners which may license or distribute fiber products that we develop;

·  
respond effectively to competitive pressures; or

·  
recruit and build a management team to accomplish our business plan.

If we are unable to accomplish these goals, our business is unlikely to succeed.
 
As a result of our limited operating history, we may not be able to correctly estimate our future operating expenses, which could lead to cash shortfalls.
 
We have a limited operating history from which to evaluate our business.  We have not generated any revenues to date, and we have not produced a transgenic silkworm nor have we demonstrated the viability of our technology.  Our failure to develop a transgenic silkworm would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue operating.  Accordingly, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in an early stage of development.  We may not be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
 
 
 
 
Because of this limited operating history and because of the emerging nature of our fiber product we are seeking to develop, our historical financial data is of limited value in estimating future operating expenses.  Our budgeted expense levels are based in part on our expectations concerning future revenues.  However, our ability to generate any revenues depends largely on our ability to (i) develop a transgenic silkworm and (ii) create polymer fibers from the silk created by such transgenic silkworms.  Moreover, even if we successfully develop a transgenic silkworm and polymer fibers from recombinant silk fibers, the size of any future revenues depends on the market acceptance of such fibers we develop, which is difficult to forecast accurately. 
 
Our operating results may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control.  For these reasons, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as any indication of our future performance.  Our quarterly and annual expenses are likely to increase substantially over the next several years depending upon the level of fiber development activities.  Our operating results in future quarters may fall below expectations.  Any of these events could adversely impact our business prospects and make it more difficult to raise additional equity capital at an acceptable price per share. 
 
The report of the independent registered public accounting firm on our 2008 financial statements contains a going concern modification.
 
The report of the independent registered public accounting firm covering our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 stated that certain factors, including that we are a development stage company and we have a working capital and shareholder equity deficit, raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
 
We may be unable to maintain an effective system of internal controls and accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which may cause our current and potential stockholders to lose confidence in our financial reporting and adversely impact our business and our ability to raise additional funds in the future.
 
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial statements and effectively prevent fraud.  We have no internal accounting staff.  As we noted in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, we reported that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective for the purposes for which it is intended because we had a material weaknesses:  We did not have a system in place to ensure all of our consulting agreements are timely reconciled to the financial statements.  Though we have taken some steps to we have taken steps to address our material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, including education of management of disclosure requirements and financial reporting controls, we still have not eliminated the material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting.  If we cannot provide reliable financial statements or prevent fraud, our operating results and our reputation could be harmed as a result, causing stockholders and/or prospective investors to lose confidence in management and making it more difficult for us to raise additional capital in the future.
 
We currently do not have any patent rights in the products we are seeking to develop and we currently license the genetic sequences and genetic engineering technology we need to develop our products.  If any third party challenges our claim to intellectual property rights in the fiber products we are seeking to develop or the intellectual property rights that we license, our business may be materially harmed
 
We have no patents or design patents on any of the fiber products we are seeking to develop.  It is possible that the fiber products we are seeking to develop could be imitated or directly manufactured and sold by a competitor.  In addition, some or all of our research, development ideas and proposed products may be covered by patent rights held by some other entity.  In that event, we could incur devastating liability and be forced to cease operations.
 
We have entered into an intellectual property licensing agreement with Notre Dame and the University of Wyoming.  Pursuant to these licensing agreements, we have obtained certain exclusive rights to use intellectual property and genetic sequences owned by these universities.  However, we have no guarantee of the viability of these intellectual property rights or the rights that we have licensed do not infringe on the legal rights of third parties.  The intellectual property rights that we have licensed could be challenged or voided or that the licensed intellectual property is worthless and without utility.  We may also need to license additional intellectual property from persons or entities in order to successfully complete our research and development, and we cannot be certain that we would be able to enter into a license agreement with such persons or entities.  In which event our operations will be adversely affected and our prospects negatively affected.    Our agreement with the University of Notre Dame has lapsed but we are in the process of renewing that agreement which we expect will be renewed in October 2009 on substantially the same terms as the prior agreement.
 
 
We have limited intellectual property protection in overseas markets, which could affect our ability to grow our markets and increase our revenue.
 
The intellectual property that we licensed from Notre Dame and the University of Wyoming is covered by a series of US patents and US patent applications with limited or no international patent protection.  Overseas competitors could be using the same technology that we have licensed, which would affect our ability to expand our markets beyond the United States.  We are aware that laboratories and potential competitors overseas are using the “piggyback” gene splicing technology for the genetic modification of silkworm.    Such limited overseas intellectual property could affect our ability to introduce fiber products in overseas markets or effectively compete in such markets.
 
The patents underlying our license agreements could expire prior to our commercializing our specialty fibers, which would result in the loss of our competitive edge and could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.
 
The patent rights that we license could expire before we are ready to market or commercialize any fiber product, or while we are still in research and development of proposed products.  In which event the patents would be worthless and would not protect us from potential competitors who would then have low barriers to entry and who would be in a position to compete more effectively with us.
 
Our license agreements restrict us from developing products for certain markets.
 
Some, but not all, of the gene sequences that we have licensed from Notre Dame and the University of Wyoming are covered by restrictions in the licensing agreement which preclude their use by us for sporting goods and medical applications.
 
We have not registered any trademark rights for products we are seeking to develop and we therefore have to rely on common law trademark protection until we register our trademark.
 
Our research, proposed products, product names, labels, signage and advertising material, are not protected by any registered trademark rights or may be subject to an expired trademark registration.  We could be forced by litigation, or threat of litigation, to abandon our product names, labels, signage, advertising material, and even our research.  In such event we could incur substantial material expense, and could lose the value of marketing and promotional work and our research performed up to that date.  These losses would be in addition to the loss resulting from the payment of an award of damages to the party instituting or threatening litigation.  Such additional expenses could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations, which could negatively affect our stock price.
 
Our management has no previous experience in developing, marketing or selling recombinant fiber  which may have a negative effect on our ability to develop or sell our products.
 
We are recently formed corporation.  Our current management has no previous experience in developing, marketing or selling recombinant fiber and the other products that we intend to develop and market.  Additionally, our current management has no experience in the business of scientific research and development, which is critical to our success.  The inexperience of our management may negatively affect our ability to succeed in developing, marketing and/or distributing our proposed products.
 
We are unprepared for technological changes in our industry, which could result in our products being obsolete or replaced by better technology .
 
The industry in which we participate   is subject to rapid business and technological changes.  The business, technology, marketing, legal and regulatory changes that could occur may have a material adverse impact on us.  New inventions and product innovations may make our proposed products obsolete.  Other researches may develop and patent technologies which make our line of research obsolete.  We may not have the financial or technical ability to keep up with its competitors.
 
Our business is based on unproven scientific research and makes our business highly risky .
 
We are engaging in research and development of new recombinant silk fibers.  Due to the speculative nature of this scientific research, our chances of success are speculative and we cannot be certain that we will succeed in developing new fibers or that our use of novel transgenic methods will be successful.  An investment in us, therefore, is highly speculative and risky.
 
 
 
The fibers we develop could expose us to product liability claims and government regulation, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations .
 
The fibers we are seeking to develop may subject us to product liability claims if widely used, including but not limited to design defect, environmental hazards, quality control, and durability of product.  This potential liability is increased by virtue of the fact that our products in development may be used as protective and safety materials.  There is tremendous potential liability to any person who is injured by, or while using, one of our products.  As a manufacturer, we may be strictly liable for any damage caused by our products.  This liability might not be covered by insurance, or may exceed any coverage that we may obtain.
 
Additionally, our products, if successfully developed, will be produced by means of genetic engineering.  These transgenic methods may carry inherent environmental risks and the production of the products may therefore also be heavily regulated by the government.  We may face changes in governmental regulation polices and practices which could have a significant adverse effect on us and our ability to develop, produce and market any products.
 
Our operations would be negatively affected by any dispute with our partner Universities or by labor unrest (such as disputes, strikes or lockouts) between such Universities and its academic staff .
 
We have signed intellectual property, sponsored research and collaborative research agreements with one or more universities.  The continued cooperation of university(s), as well as the cooperation of other institutions and or universities is essential for our success of the Company. In the event of a material dispute with the university(s), such a dispute could create a cessation of operations for a period of time that could be detrimental to our operations and survival.  Additionally, in the event of a material dispute between such universities and its employees could create a cessation of operations for period of time that could be detrimental to our product development.
 
Unforeseen circumstances may require us to use the proceeds from the Equity Line of Credit in a manner not set forth in the Use of Proceeds section of this prospectus .
 
We have disclosed an itemized Use of Proceeds, and thus, we have disclosed how our management intends to administer the proceeds from the equity line of credit.  Management does intend to use the proceeds from this offering, in part, to pay off some of our past indebtedness and accounts payable, including accrued amounts owed to management as well contractual obligations associated with this offering.  However, results of our research and development may not go as we hope and we may have to conduct further research and development that we currently do not expect that we will have to do.  In such event,, the funds used for these purposes will require us to raise additional capital.
 
Our competitors are larger competitors with greater financial resources than we have and we may face increased competition due to the low barriers of entry to our industry .
 
We compete directly with numerous other companies with similar product lines and/or distribution that have extensive capital, resources, market share, and brand recognition.  There are few barriers to entry on the industry in which we compete.  This creates the strong possibility of new competitors emerging, and of others succeeding in developing the same or similar fibers that we are trying to develop.  The effects of this increased competition may be materially adverse to us and our stockholders.
 
We may face various governmental regulation, which could increase our costs and lower our future profitability .
 
Governmental regulation regarding import/export, taxes, transgenic, scientific research and university based research, biological research; transgenic product manufacture and distribution, environmental regulation and packaging requirements may be adverse to our operations, research and development, revenues, and potential profit.  We are especially at risk from governmental restriction and regulations related to the development of materials by use of transgenic organisms.  Federal and state regulations impose strict regulation on the use, storage, and transportation of such transgenic organisms.  Such rules impose severe penalties on us for any breach of regulations, for any spill, release, or contamination caused while the substances are under our direct or indirect ownership or control.  We are not aware of any such breach of governmental regulation, or of any spill, release, or contamination.  If such a release, or other regulatory breach does occur in the future, the resulting clean up costs, and/or fines and penalties, would cause a material negative effect on the Company and its financial future.  In that event, investors could expect to lose their entire investment.
 
 
 
Risks Related to Our Stock
 
We may need to raise additional capital by sales of our Class A common stock, which may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock and your rights in us may be reduced.
 
We expect to continue to incur product development and selling, general and administrative costs, and in order to satisfy our funding requirements, we will need to sell additional equity securities, in transactions similar in size and scope to our Equity Line of Credit covered by this prospectus.  Such additional sales of equity securities may be subject to registration rights.  The sale or the proposed sale of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public markets may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock and our stock price may decline substantially. Our stockholders may experience substantial dilution and a reduction in the price that they are able to obtain upon sale of their shares. Also, new equity securities issued may have greater rights, preferences or privileges than our existing Class A common stock.
 
There is no assurance of an established public trading market.
 
A regular trading market for our Class A common stock may not be sustained in the future. FINRA has enacted changes that limit quotation on the OTCBB to securities of issuers that are current in their reports filed with the SEC. The OTCBB is an inter-dealer, over-the-counter market that provides significantly less liquidity than a listing on the Nasdaq Stock Markets or other national securities exchange. Quotes for stocks included on the OTCBB are not listed in the financial sections of newspapers as are those for the Nasdaq Stock Market. Therefore, prices for securities traded solely on the OTCBB may be difficult to obtain and holders of Class A common stock may be unable to resell their securities at or near their original offering price or at any price. Market prices for our Class A common stock will be influenced by a number of factors, including:
 
·  
the issuance of new equity securities pursuant to a future offering;

·  
competitive developments;

·  
variations in quarterly operating results;

·  
change in financial estimates by securities analysts;

·  
the depth and liquidity of the market for our Class A common stock;

·  
investor perceptions of our company and the technologies industries generally; and

·  
general economic and other national conditions.

Our Class A common stock is considered “a penny stock” and, as a result, it may be difficult to trade a significant number of shares of our Class A common stock.
 
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted regulations that generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. Since our Class A common stock has been eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, the market price of our Class A common stock has been less than $5.00 per share.  As a result of our prior private placements, we will have increased the number of shares outstanding by almost ten-fold.  Consequently, it is likely that the market price for our Class A common stock will remain less than $5.00 per share for the foreseeable future and therefore may be a “penny stock” according to SEC rules. This designation requires any broker or dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules may restrict the ability of brokers or dealers to sell our Class A common stock and may affect the ability of investors hereunder to sell their shares. In addition, because our Class A common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, investors may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations of the stock and may experience a lack of buyers to purchase such stock or a lack of market makers to support the stock price.
 
We do not intend to pay dividends.
 
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our securities. We currently intend to retain our earnings for funding growth and, therefore, do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

 
 

 
Risk Factors Related to the Equity Line of Credit and This Offering

We are registering an aggregate of 88,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued under the Equity Line of Credit.  The sale of such shares could depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

We are registering an aggregate of 88,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock, including 2,000,000 shares of common stock under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part for issuance pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit. The sale of these shares into the public market by Calm Seas could depress the market price of our common stock .   As of September 28, 2009, there were 513,377,924 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

We may not have access to the full amount under the Equity Line.

As of September 28, 2009, the closing market price of our common stock was $0.016. There is no assurance that the market price of our Class A common stock will increase substantially in the near future. The entire commitment under the Equity Line of Credit is $1,000,000.  Presumably we will maintain the market price of our common stock at approximately $0.014 we need to issue 88,500,000 shares of common stock to Calm Seas in order to have access to the full amount under the Equity Line of Credit.

Calm Seas will pay less than the then-prevailing market price for our Class A common stock.

The Class A common stock to be issued to Calm Seas pursuant to the Letter Agreement will be purchased at a twenty percent discount to the lowest closing bid price of our Class A common stock during the five consecutive trading days immediately following the date we deliver to Calm Seas a notice of our election to put shares to it pursuant to the Letter Agreement. Calm Seas has a financial incentive to sell our Class A common stock immediately upon receiving the shares to realize the profit equal to the difference between the discounted price and the market price. If Calm Seas sells the shares, the price of our Class A common stock could decrease. If our stock price decreases, Calm Seas may have a further incentive to sell the shares of our Class A common stock that it holds. These sales may have a further impact on our stock price.

There may not be sufficient trading volume in our Class A common stock to permit us to generate adequate funds from the exercise of our put.

The Letter Agreement provides that the dollar value that we will be permitted to put to Calm Seas will be the lesser of: (A) 200% of the average daily volume in the OTC Bulletin Board of the Class A common stock for the ten trading days prior to the date we deliver to Calm Seas a notice of our put, multiplied by the average of the ten daily closing prices immediately preceding the date we deliver a put notice to Calm Seas, or (B) $75,000 .    We will automatically withdraw our put notice to Calm Seas if the lowest closing bid price used to determine the purchase price of the put shares is not at least equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the average closing “bid” price for our Class A common stock for the ten (10) trading days prior to the put date.  If the average daily trading volume in our Class A common stock is too low, it is possible that we would exercise a put for less than $75, , which may not provide adequate funding for our planned operations.

Our Class A common stock is thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

Our common stock has historically been sporadically or “thinly-traded” on the OTCBB, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or nonexistent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable.

As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a mature issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price.  It is possible that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will not develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will continue.

The selling shareholder may engage in short sales.  Significant short sales of our commons tock will cause the decline of our share price.

In connection with the distribution of the Class A common stock or otherwise, the selling shareholder may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions. In connection with such transactions, broker-dealers or other financial institutions may engage in short sales of shares in the course of hedging the positions they assume with the selling shareholder. If there are significant short sales of our stock, the price decline that would result from this activity will cause our share price to decline which in turn may cause long holders of our stock to sell their shares thereby contributing to sales of stock in the market. If there is an imbalance on the sell side of the market our stock the price will decline. It is not possible to predict if the circumstances where by a short sales could materialize or to what our share price could drop. In some companies that have been subjected to short sales their stock price has dropped to near zero. We cannot provide any assurances that this situation will not happen to us.
 
 

 
Shares eligible for future sale by our current shareholders may adversely affect our stock price.

To date, we have had a very limited trading volume in our Class A common stock.  As long as this condition continues, the sale of a significant number of shares of Class A common stock at any particular time could be difficult to achieve at the market prices prevailing immediately before such shares are offered.  In addition, sales of substantial amounts of Class A common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 144 or otherwise could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital at that time through the sale of our securities.  
 
If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board, which would limit the ability of Broker-Dealers to sell our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, and must be current in their reports under Section 13 of the Exchange Act, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board.  If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board.  As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.
  
USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock offered by Calm Seas. However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of our common stock to Calm Seas pursuant to the put right under the Letter Agreement. The proceeds from our exercise of the put option pursuant to the Letter Agreement will be used as follows:

Month
Salaries (1)
Research & Development Expenses (2)
Professional
Services (3)
Office
Expense (4)
Reserve (5)
1
$13,217
$93,533
$19,667
$1,200
$2,500
2
13,217
93,533
2,000
$1,200
$2,500
3
13,217
58,833
2,000
$1,200
$2,500
4
13,217
2,433
2,000
$1,200
$2,500
5
13,217
2,433
11,668
$1,200
$2,500
6
13,217
2,433
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
7
13,217
2,433
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
8
13,217
2,433
8,667
$1,200
$2,500
9
13,217
2,433
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
10
13,217
2,433
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
11
13,217
2,433
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
12
13,217
2,433
7,663
$1,200
$2,500
13
13,217
48,133
2,000
$1,200
$2,500
14
13,217
48,133
2,000
$1,200
$2,000
15
13,217
48,133
2,000
$1,200
$2,000
16
13,217
48,133
2,000
$1,200
$2,000
17
13,217
3,133
7,000
$1,200
$2,000
18
13,217
3,133
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
19
13,217
3,133
2,667
$1,200
$2,500
20
13,217
3,133
7,000
$1,200
$1,500
21
13,217
3,133
10,600
$1,200
$1,250
22
13,217
3,133
2,000
$1,200
$1,250
23
13,217
3,133
2,000
$1,200
$1,250
24
13,217
3,133
7,666
$1,200
$1,250
TOTAL
$317,208
$485,392.00
$116,600.00
$28,800.00
$52,000.00
 
 
12


 
(1) Consists of employee salaries, cost of benefits and payroll taxes.
(2) Includes research and development expenses we are required to incur under our research collaboration agreement with the University of Notre Dame.  Also includes (i) payments for a portion of the amount owed by the Company to its CEO for the transfer of intellectual property to the Company, which has been recorded in the financial statements as royalty payments due to a related party and (ii) auto and travel expenses (including the purchase of an automobile) that will be primarily related to investor relations matters.
(3) Includes legal, accounting, press release and EDGAR filing services and transfer agent expenses.  Legal expenses will include not only SEC matters (such as periodic reporting and expenses related to this registration) but also intellectual property matters (such as patent filings).
(4) Office expenses include rent, telecommunications, postage/shipping, office equipment and office supplies.
(5)  Approximately $2,500 will be set aside each month (up to 6% of gross proceeds) to cover expenses due to contingent events, such as equipment loss or replacement or increase in research and development expenses from unforeseen events.
 
SELLING SHAREHOLDER

The following table sets forth the name of the selling shareholder, the number of shares of common stock owned, the number of shares of common stock registered by this prospectus and the number and percent of outstanding shares that the selling shareholder will own after the sale of the registered shares, assuming all of the shares are sold.  The information provided in the table and discussions below has been obtained from the selling shareholder.  As used in this prospectus, “selling shareholder” includes donees, pledges, transferees or other successors in interest selling shares of our common stock received from the named selling shareholder as a gift, pledge, distribution or other non sale-related transfer.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act.  Unless otherwise noted, each person or group identified possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. As of September 28, 2009, there were 513,377,924 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

On September 14, 2009, we entered into the Amended Letter Agreement with Calm Seas to raise up to $1,000,000 through an equity line of credit.   Except as described above, to our knowledge Calm Seas has not had a material relationship with us during the last three years, other than as an owner of our common stock or other securities.
 
Beneficial Ownership of Class A Common Shares
Prior to this Offering
Number of Shares
to  be Sold
Beneficial Ownership of Class A Common Shares after this Offering
 
Selling Shareholder
Number of Shares
Percent of Class
  Under this Prospectus (1)
Number of Shares (2)
Percent of Class (3)
 
Calm Seas Capital, Ltd. (4)
377 S. Nevada St.
Carson City, NV 89703
 
88,500,000
 
14.7%-
 
88,500,000
 
0
 
--
 
             
Total
88,500,000
14.7%
88,500,000
0
--
 
 
(1)  
The number of shares set forth in the table represents an estimate of the number of common shares to be offered by the selling shareholder.  We have assumed the sale of all of the common shares offered under this prospectus will be sold. However, as the selling shareholder can offer all, some or none of its common stock, no definitive estimate can be given as to the number of shares that the selling shareholder will offer or sell under this prospectus.

(2)  
These numbers assume the selling shareholder sells all of its shares after the completion of the offering.
 
 

 
(3)  
Based on 601,877,924 shares of Class A common stock outstanding after the completion of the offering.
 
(4)  
Calm Seas Capital, LLC is a Nevada limited liability company.  Michael Andrew McCarthy is the managing member of Calm Seas with voting and investment power over the shares.
 
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The purpose of this prospectus is to permit the selling shareholder to offer and sell up to an aggregate of 88,500,000 shares at such times and at such places as they choose.  The decision to sell any shares is within the sole discretion of the holder thereof.

The distribution of the Class A common stock by a selling shareholder may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions.  Any of the Class A common stock may be offered for sale, from time to time, by a selling shareholder, or by permitted transferees or successors of the selling shareholder, or otherwise, at prices and on terms then obtainable, at fixed prices, at prices then prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing prices, or in negotiated transactions at negotiated prices or otherwise.  The Class A common stock may be sold by one or more of the following:
 
·
On the OTCBB or any other national common stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our Class A common stock is traded, which may involve transactions solely between a broker-dealer and its customers which are not traded across an open market and block trades.

·
Through one or more dealers or agents (which may include one or more underwriters), including, but not limited to:

·
Block trades in which the broker or dealer as principal and resale by such broker or dealer for its account pursuant to this prospectus.

·
Purchases by a broker or dealer as principal and resale by such broker or dealer for its account pursuant to this prospectus.

·
Ordinary brokerage transactions.

·
Transactions in which the broker solicits purchasers

·
Directly to one or more purchasers.

·
A combination of these methods.

Calm Seas and any broker-dealers who act in connection with the sale of its shares are “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any discounts, concessions or commissions received by them and profit on any resale of the shares as principal may be deemed to be underwriting discounts, concessions and commissions under the Securities Act.

In connection with the distribution of the Class A common stock or otherwise, the selling shareholder may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions. In connection with such transactions, broker-dealers or other financial institutions may engage in short sales of shares in the course of hedging the positions they assume with the selling shareholder. A selling shareholder may also sell shares short and redeliver the shares to close out such short positions. A selling shareholder may also enter into options or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which require the delivery to such broker-dealers or other financial institutions of the Class A common stock, which shares such broker-dealers or financial institutions may resell pursuant to this prospectus, as supplemented or amended to reflect that transaction. A selling shareholder may also pledge the common stock registered hereunder to a broker-dealer or other financial institution and, upon a default, such broker-dealer or other financial institution may affect sales of the pledged shares pursuant to this prospectus, as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction. In addition, any Class A common stock covered by this prospectus that qualifies for sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 rather than pursuant to this prospectus.

The selling shareholder or its underwriters, dealers or agents may sell the Class A common stock to or through underwriters, dealers or agents, and such underwriters, dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed. Underwriters, dealers, brokers or other agents engaged by the selling shareholder may arrange for other such persons to participate. Any fixed public offering price and any discounts and concessions may be changed from time to time. Underwriters, dealers and agents who participate in the distribution of the common stock may be deemed to be underwriters within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any discounts or commissions received by them or any profit on the resale of shares by them may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions thereunder. The proposed amounts of the Class A common stock, if any, to be purchased by underwriters and the compensation, if any, of underwriters, dealers or agents will be set forth in a prospectus supplement.
 
 

 
Unless granted an exemption by the Commission from Regulation M under the Exchange Act, or unless otherwise permitted under Regulation M, a selling shareholder  will not engage in any stabilization activity in connection with our Class A common stock, will furnish each broker or dealer engaged by a selling shareholder and each other participating broker or dealer the number of copies of this prospectus required by such broker or dealer, and will not bid for or purchase any Class A common stock of our or attempt to induce any person to purchase any of the Class A common stock other than as permitted under the Exchange Act.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares of Class A common stock offered by the selling shareholder. We shall use our best efforts to prepare and file with the Commission such amendments and supplements to the registration statement and this prospectus as may be necessary to keep such registration statement effective and to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act with respect to the disposition of the common stock covered by the registration statement for the period required to effect the distribution of such common stock.

We are paying certain expenses (other than commissions and discounts of underwriters, dealers or agents) incidental to the offering and sale of the common stock to the public, which are estimated to be approximately $17,081. If we are required to update this prospectus during such period, we may incur additional expenses in excess of the amount estimated above.

In order to comply with certain state securities laws, if applicable, the common stock will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In certain states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualify for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.
 
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

General
 
Our original articles of incorporation authorized 60,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, 25,000,000 shares of Class B common stock with no par value per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with no par value per share.  On February 16, 2009, we amended our articles of incorporation to provide for unlimited authorized shares, no par value, of Class A common stock and Class B common stock. There are no provisions in our charter or by-laws that would delay, defer or prevent a change in our control.
 
Common Stock
 
As of September 28, 2009, 513,377,924 shares of common stock Class A are issued and outstanding and held by 28 shareholders of record, and we had no shares of Class B common issued and outstanding.  Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote.
 
Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock do not have cumulative voting rights .
 
Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares of both classes of common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. Holders of both classes of our common stock representing a majority of the voting power of our capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of our stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation.
 
Although there are no provisions in our charter or by-laws that may delay, defer or prevent a change in control, we are authorized, without shareholder approval, to issue shares of preferred stock that may contain rights or restrictions that could have this effect.   

Holders of both classes of common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Holders of both classes of our common stock have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to our common stock.
 
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
Our articles of incorporation also provide that we are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with no par value per share. As of the date of this prospectus, there are no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Our Board of Directors has the authority, without further action by the shareholders, to issue from time to time the preferred stock in one or more series for such consideration and with such relative rights, privileges, preferences and restrictions that the Board may determine. The preferences, powers, rights and restrictions of different series of preferred stock may differ with respect to dividend rates, amounts payable on liquidation, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption provisions, sinking fund provisions and purchase funds and other matters. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock.

As further described in our financial statements, the company anticipates that it will issue 200,000 preferred shares to Kim Thompson pursuant an agreement between the company and Mr. Thompson.  Such preferred shares will have no right to dividends or other distributions, but will have super voting rights such that each preferred share will have the voting power equivalent to one hundred common class “A” shares.  We have not filed a certificate of designation to set the rights and preferences for these preferred shares to be issued to Mr. Thompson

Dividends
 
Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our Class A common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
 
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

No expert or counsel named in this prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this prospectus or having given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering of the common stock was employed on a contingency basis, or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries. Nor was any such person connected with the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, or employee.
 
The consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 included in this prospectus and the registration statement have been audited by Webb & Company, P.A. to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein and in the registration statement, and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
 
 
 
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
Overview

We are Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Wyoming on April 25, 2006.  We were organized to develop high strength, protein-based fibers, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in both the specialty fiber and technical textile industries.  Specialty fibers are engineered for specific uses that require exceptional strength, heat resistance and/or chemical resistance.  The specialty fiber market is dominated by two synthetic fiber products:  aramid fibers and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fiber.  Examples of these synthetic fibers include Kevlar® and Spectra®.  The technical textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g., sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g., high-strength composite materials).

We have collaboration agreements with University of Notre Dame and the University of Wyoming that give us the exclusive use of certain intellectual property for fibers in commercially viable quantities.  We will then use these technologies to develop fibers with greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our target markets, namely the specialty fiber and technical textile industries.

We are currently in the first stage of our development, which is to develop a transgenic silkworm that can produce a natural spider silk fiber by inserting patented genetic sequences into ordinary silkworms using patented genetic engineering technology under our license and collaboration agreements with the University of Norte Dame and the University of Wyoming.  The proceeds from the offering, as described below, will be used to fund this first stage, which we expect to complete by October 1, 2011.
 
The Market

We are focusing our work on the creation of high performance and technical fiber.  The performance fiber market is currently dominated by two classes of product: aramid fibers, exemplified by Kevlar® (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company), and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fiber, exemplified by Dyneema® (DSM NV) and Spectra® (Honeywell International Inc.).  These products service the need for materials with high strength, resilience, and flexibility.  Because these synthetic performance fibers are stronger and tougher than steel, they are used in a wide variety of military, industrial, and consumer applications.

Among the users of these materials are the military and police departments, which employ them for ballistic protection.  The materials are also used for industrial applications requiring superior strength and toughness, i.e. critical cables and abrasion/impact resistant components.  These fibers are also employed in safety equipment, high strength composite materials for the aero-space industry and for ballistic protection by the defense industry.

The global market for technical textiles is currently estimated at $92.88 billion.  The demand for technical textiles is growing rapidly and is expected to reach $127 billion in 2010.

These are industrial materials which have become essential products for both industrial and consumer applications.  The market for technical textiles can be defined as consisting of:
 
·  
Medical textiles;
 
·  
 Geotextiles;
 
·  
Textiles used in Defense and Military;
 
·  
Safe and Protective Clothing;
 
·  
Filtration Textiles;
 
·  
Textiles used in Transportation;
 
·  
Textiles used in Buildings;
 
·  
Composites with Textile Structure;
 
·  
Functional and Sportive Textiles.
 

We believe that the superior mechanical characteristics of the next generation of protein-based polymers (in other words, genetically engineered silk fibers), will open up new applications for the technology and result in a significant increase in demand. The materials which we are working to produce are many times tougher and stronger than steel.  These fibers are often referred to as “super fibers.”

The Product

Certain fibers produced in nature possess unique mechanical properties in terms of strength, resilience and flexibility.  These protein based fibers, exemplified by spider silk, have been the subject of much interest to the U.S. military.  The military’s interest in spider silks stems from the incredible toughness of the material, as illustrated in the table below.
 
Comparison of the Properties of Spider Silk, Kevlar® and Steel

   
Material Toughness 1
 
Tensile Strength 2
 
Weight 3
Dragline spider silk
 
120,000-160,000
 
1,100-2,900
 
1.18-1.36
             
Steel
 
2,000-6,000
 
300-2,000
 
7.84

1 Measured by the energy required to break a continuous filament, expressed in joules per kilogram (J/kg).  A .357 caliber bullet has approximately 925 joules of kinetic energy at impact.  

2 Tensile strength refers to the greatest longitudinal stress the fiber can bear, measured by force over area in units of newtons per square meter.  The measurement here is in millions of pascals.

3   In grams per cubic centimeter of material.                                                                                      

We believe that the genetically engineered protein-based fibers we seek to produce have properties that are in some ways so superior to the materials currently available in the marketplace.  For example, as noted above, the ability of spider fiber to absorb in excess of 100,000 joules of kinetic energy, which makes it the potentially ideal material for structural blast protection.

Production of this material in commercial quantities holds the promise of a life saving ballistic resistant material, which is lighter, thinner, more flexible, and tougher than steel. Other applications for spider silk based fibers include use as structural material and for any application in which light weight and high strength are required.  We believe that polymer fibers made with recombinant protein-based fiber will make significant inroads into the specialty fiber and technical textile markets.

While the superior properties of spider silks are well known, there is presently no known way to produce these fibers in commercial quantity.  The spiders are cannibalistic, and can not be raised in concentrated colonies.  However, we envision that recombinant fiber, with its superior mechanical characteristics, will supplant the current generation of high performance fiber.

Our Technology

While scientists have been able to replicate the proteins that are the building blocks of spider silk, the technological barrier that has stymied production until now has been the inability to form these proteins into a fiber with the desired mechanical characteristics.
 
We have licensed the exclusive right to use the patented genetic sequences and genetic engineering technology developed at Notre Dame and the University of Wyoming, and in working collaboratively with those laboratories, we are developing fibers with the mechanical characteristics of spider silk.  We are applying our proprietary genetic engineering technology to domesticated silkworms, which are already one of the most efficient commercial producers of silk.
 
Our technology builds upon the unique advantages of the domesticated silkworm for this application.  The silkworm is ideally suited to produce recombinant protein fiber because it is already an efficient commercial and industrial producer of protein based polymers.  Forty percent (40%) of the caterpillars’ weight is devoted to the silk glands. The silk glands produce large volumes of protein, called fibroin, which are then spun into a composite protein thread (silk).
 
We are working to use our genetic engineering technology to create recombinant silk polymers.
 
 

 
A part of our intellectual property portfolio is the exclusive right to use the patented spider silk gene sequences in silkworm.  Under the Exclusive License Agreement with The University of Wyoming, we have obtained certain exclusive rights to use numerous genetic sequences which are the subject of five US patents and two pending patent applications held by The University of Wyoming.

The introduction of the gene sequence, in the manner employed by us, results in a germline transformation and is therefore self perpetuating.  This technology is in essence a protein expression platform which has other potential applications including diagnostics and pharmaceutical production.
 
The Company

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (Kraig) is a Wyoming corporation.   Kraig is a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which occurred as a result of its original SB 2 filing in late 2007.  The Company is up to date with all necessary filings with the SEC.

Our shares are traded OTCBB under the ticker symbol: KBLB.  There are 513,377,924 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.  Kim Thompson, our founder and CEO, owns approximately 62.5% of the issued and outstanding shares.

The inventor of our technology, Kim Thompson, is the founder of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.  Our protein expression system is, in concept, scalable, cost effective, and capable of producing a wide range of proteins including pharmaceuticals and materials.

In order to reduce the technology to practice, we have entered into intellectual property and collaborative research agreements with two leading universities which are at the forefront in this field:   the University of Wyoming and the University of Notre Dame.  One of our major shareholders, the University of Wyoming Foundation, is a public university which has contributed significant intellectual property to the enterprise.

Certain patented genetic tools, methods, and proprietary gene sequences invented and discovered by researchers at these universities are pivotal in our work.  We have negotiated and obtained certain exclusive proprietary rights to use Notre Dame’s and the University of Wyoming’s intellectual property for the product development and commercialization of our fiber products.

We entered into an intellectual property and collaborative research agreement with the University of Notre Dame in 2007.  That agreement was subsequently extended and expanded to include research and development of certain platform technologies with potential applications for diagnostics and pharmaceutical production.  While the extenchion has expired, the Company anticipates that the agreement will be further extended. Pursuant to these agreements the genetic work is being conducted primarily within Notre Dame’s laboratories.

We have also entered into an intellectual property and sponsored research agreement with the University of Wyoming.

Collaboration and Research Agreements

We have obtained certain exclusive rights to use a number of university created, and patented, spider silk proteins, gene sequences and methodologies held by the University of Wyoming and the University of Notre Dame.  We have also acquired certain exclusive rights to patent pending protein based fibers and genetic technologies.

In 2008, the University of Notre Dame filed two provisional patent applications pursuant to our intellectual property and collaborative research agreement.  In addition, we have filed a separate U.S. provisional patent application regarding certain methodologies, genetic sequences, organic polymers and composite silk fibers.  We anticipate that our intellectual property portfolio will continue to grow in 2010.
 
Intellectual Property/Collaborative Research Agreement with Notre Dame University
 
Our collaborative research agreement with the University of Notre Dame requires the Company to provide cost reimbursement for scientific research performed within Notre Dame relating to recombinant silk development.  The reimbursable costs to the Company are caped at $35,000 per calendar quarter, unless the Company provides prior authorization for exceeding that cap.  Pursuant to that agreement we have a right to an exclusive license to intellectual property developed pursuant to the collaborative research on terms to be negotiated on a case by case basis.  The university retains a right to a commercially reasonable royalty on all such technology.    Our agreement with the University of Notre Dame has lapsed but we are in the process of renewing that agreement which we expect will be renewed in October 2009 on substantially the same terms as the prior agreement.

 

 
Exclusive License Agreement with University of Wyoming

Our collaborative research agreement with the University of Wyoming requires that we pay licensing and research fees to the university in exchange for an exclusive license to in our field of use for certain university-developed intellectual property including patented spider silk gene sequences.  Pursuant to the agreement, we issued 1,050,000 shares of our Class A common stock to the University Foundation.  We also issued to the University Foundation 700,000 shares of our Class A common stock which is subject to our right to call such shares at any time prior to May 8, 2011 at a purchase price of $150,000.
 
Research and Development

Our current research and development is being conducted sequentially in two stages.

First stage: Reduction to practice

1) We will reduce to practice our technology for  spider silk protein expression in the silk glands of the silkworm.  The focus at this stage is spider silk analogs and the production of new silk fibers composed of recombinant proteins.  We are hopeful that we can achieve this goal by December 31, 2010.  We believe that our transgenic system is essentially “plug and play”, in that once the system is established the gene sequence for any compatible protein can be inserted for expression by the system.

Second stage: Commercialization

2) High Performance Fibers :  Once we have achieved the production of recombinant fiber, we will turn the technology to the production of high performance polymers.  We intend to will follow the accepted market structure in the industry: vertical integration for certain applications, and bulk sale of spun fiber directly to intermediate and end product manufacturers.  There is also the possibility of licensing our product and technology.
 
Our goal is to reach the following achievements within the indicated time frame:

Achievement
 
 
Time horizon
Laboratory production of recombinant fiber.
 
December 31, 2010
Laboratory production of recombinant high performance fiber.
 
April 30, 2011
Commercialization of recombinant fiber.
 
January 30, 2012
 
Employees

We currently have no employees other than Kim Thompson, our sole officer and director.  We plan to hire more persons on as-needed basis.  
 
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
 
We pay a annual  rent of $600 for conference facilities, mail, fax and reception services located at 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805, Lansing, Michigan 48950, which is our principal place of business.  Our current lease is on a month to month basis.
 
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no legal proceedings pending or threatened against us or our officers and directors.
 
 
 
 
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
Market Information

Our common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board system under the symbol “KBLB” since February 20, 2008.

The following table sets forth the high and low trade information for our Class A common stock for each quarter since we began trading on February 20, 2008. The prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns or commissions and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.  The prices below reflect a, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock dividend which was declared by our board of directors on March 23, 2009.  The stock split was distributed to shareholders of record as of April 27, 2009.
 
Quarter ended
 
Low Price
   
High Price
 
June 30, 2008
 
$
0.022
   
$
0.047
 
 September 30, 2008
 
$
0.011
   
$
0.039
 
December 31, 2008
 
$
0.011
   
$
0.04
 
March 31, 2009
 
$
0.011
   
$
0.044
 
June 30, 2009
 
$
0.017
   
$
0.06
 

Holders

As of September 28, 2009 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we had 28 record holders of our Class A common stock.
 
Dividends

To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.
 
Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
 
Stock Option Grants

To date, we have not granted any stock options.  In 2006, our CEO, Kim Thompson, received substantial warrants on our stock pursuant to the employment agreement between Mr. Thompson and us.  However, Mr. Thompson surrendered all such warrants and options to the corporation prior to the close of the 2006 calendar year.  As of this date, we have no outstanding stock options.

Transfer Agent and Registrar
 
Our transfer agent is Registrar and Transfer Company, 10 Commerce Drive, Cranford, N.J. 07016 and its phone number is (908) 497-2300.
 
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
 
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the Class A common stock offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedule thereto, certain parts of which are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information regarding our Class A common stock and our company, please review the registration statement, including exhibits, schedules and reports filed as a part thereof.  Statements in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, set forth the material terms of such contract or other document but are not necessarily complete, and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference.
 
We are also subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act which requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information along with the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules thereto, may be inspected at public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F Street N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at prescribed rates. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. Because we file documents electronically with the SEC, you may also obtain this information by visiting the SEC’s Internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
 
 


 
FI NANCIAL STATEMENTS
 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)





PAGE
CONTENTS
F-1
 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
   
F-2
 BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 and 2007.
   
F-3
 STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 AND FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2008.
   
F-4
 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 25, 2006  (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2008.
   
F-5
 STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 AND FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2008.
   
F-6 - F-17
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
   
F-18
 CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2008.
   
F-19
 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008 AND FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED).
   
F-20
 CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED).
   
F-21
   CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008 AND FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED).
   
F-22 - F-33
 NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors of:
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., (a  development stage company), as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2008.  The financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements. The Company is in the development stage with a working capital and stockholders’ deficit of $538,301 and used $517,358 of cash in operations from inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.
Certified Public Accountants

Boynton Beach, Florida
April 13, 2009
 
 

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Balance Sheets
 
             
             
ASSETS
 
             
   
December 31, 2008
   
December 31, 2007
 
             
Current Assets
           
   Cash
 
$
9,537
   
$
105,818
 
Prepaid Expenses
   
3,123
     
12,500
 
Total Assets
 
$
12,660
   
$
118,318
 
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 
                 
Current Liabilities
               
        Accounts payable
 
$
65,750
   
$
22,121
 
Payroll Tax  Payable – related party
   
16,933
     
18,414
 
Royality agreement payable - related party
   
120,000
     
120,000
 
Accrued Expenses - related party
   
348,278
     
139,980
 
Total Current Liabilities
   
550,961
     
300,515
 
                 
Commitments and Contingencies
   
-
     
-
 
                 
Stockholders' Deficit
               
  Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
               
none issued  and outstanding
   
-
     
-
 
  Common stock Class A,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
               
49,934,850 and 49,934,850 shares issued and outstanding during
   
779,050
     
779,050
 
2008 and 2007, respectively
               
  Common stock Class B,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
               
no shares issued and outstanding
   
-
     
-
 
  Common Stock Issuable, 40,000 shares
   
4,000
     
-
 
  Additional paid-in capital
   
42,060
     
42,060
 
  Deficit accumulated during the development stage
   
(1,363,411
)
   
(1,003,307
)
                 
Total Stockholders' Deficit
   
(538,301
)
   
(182,197
)
                 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
 
$
12,660
   
$
118,318
 
                 
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
 
 
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Statements of Operations
 
                   
                   
                   
   
For the Years Ended
   
For the Period from April 25, 2006
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
   
(Inception) to
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
December 31, 2008
 
                   
Revenue
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
                         
Operating Expenses
                       
General and Administrative
   
74,062
     
40,798
     
122,703
 
Professional Fees
   
31,066
     
49,759
     
80,825
 
Officer's Salary
   
207,866
     
196,100
     
653,734
 
Contract Settlement
   
-
     
-
     
107,143
 
Payroll Taxes
   
9,576
     
9,188
     
18,764
 
Research and Development
   
33,077
     
177,019
     
375,009
 
Total Operating Expenses
   
355,647
     
472,864
     
1,358,178
 
                         
Loss from Operations
   
(355,647
)
   
(472,864
)
   
(1,358,178
)
                         
Other Income/(Expenses)
                       
Other income
   
2,781
     
-
     
2,781
 
Interest expense
   
(7,238
)
   
(122
)
   
(8,014
)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)
   
(4,457
)
   
(122
)
   
(5,233
)
                         
Net Loss before Provision for Income Taxes
   
(360,104
)
   
(472,986
)
   
(1,363,411
)
                         
Provision for Income  Taxes
   
-
     
-
     
-
 
                         
Net Loss
 
$
(360,104
)
 
$
(472,986
)
 
$
(1,363,411
)
                         
Net Loss Per Share  - Basic and Diluted
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.01
)
       
                         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
                       
  during the year/period - Basic and Diluted
   
49,973,316
     
41,162,532
         
                         
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
 
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Statement of Changes in Stockholders Deficit
 
For the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2008
 
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
   
Preferred Stock
   
Common Stock -
Class A
   
Common Stock -
Class B
   
Common Stock – Class A Shares To Be Issued
         
Deficit
Accumulated during
       
   
Shares
   
Par
   
Shares
   
Par
   
Shares
   
Par
   
Shares
   
Par
   
APIC
   
Development Stage
   
Total
 
                                                                   
                                                                   
Balance, April 25, 2006
   
-
   
$
-
     
-
   
$
-
     
-
   
$
-
     
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued to founder
   
-
     
-
     
33,229,200
     
180
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
180
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for services ($.08/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,750,000
     
140,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
140,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for services ($.08/share)
   
-
     
-
     
70,000
     
5,600
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
5,600
 
                                                                                         
Stock contributed by shareholder
   
-
     
-
     
(1,166,650
)
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($2.00/share)
   
-
     
-
     
400
     
200
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
200
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($2.00/share)
   
-
     
-
     
400
     
200
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
200
 
                                                                                         
Fair value of warrants issued
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
126,435
     
-
     
126,435
 
                                                                                         
Net Loss
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(530,321
)
   
(530,321
)
                                                                                         
Balance, December 31, 2006
   
-
     
-
     
33,883,350
     
146,180
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
126,435
     
(530,321
)
   
(257,706
)
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.09/share)
   
-
     
-
     
175,000
     
15,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
15,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.09/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,200,000
     
103,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
103,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
900,000
     
3,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.08/share)
   
-
     
-
     
187,500
     
15,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
15,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.08/share)
   
-
     
-
     
187,500
     
15,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
15,000
 
                                                                                     
-
 
Stock issued for services ($.08/share)
   
-
     
-
     
200,000
     
16,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
16,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.08/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,312,500
     
105,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
105,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.03/share)
   
-
     
-
     
8,049,500
     
241,485
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
241,485
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.03/share)
   
-
     
-
     
20,000
     
600
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
600
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.03/share)
   
-
     
-
     
830,000
     
24,900
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
24,900
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.03/share)
   
-
     
-
     
2,500
     
75
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
75
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.03/share)
   
-
     
-
     
12,000
     
360
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
360
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.03/share)
   
-
     
-
     
102,500
     
3,075
             
-
             
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,075
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued in connection to cash offering
   
-
     
-
     
2,812,500
     
84,375
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(84,375
)
   
-
     
-
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for services ($.10/share)
   
-
     
-
     
60,000
     
6,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,000
 
                                                                                         
Net loss, for the year ended December 31, 2007
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(472,986
)
   
(472,986
)
                                                                                         
Balance, December 31, 2007
   
-
     
-
     
49,934,850
     
779,050
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
42,060
     
(1,003,307
)
   
(182,197
)
                                                                                         
Stock issuable for services ($.10/share)
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
40,000
     
4,000
     
-
     
-
     
4,000
 
                                                                                         
Net loss, for the year ended December 31, 2008
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(360,104
)
   
(360,104
)
                                                                                         
Balance, December 31, 2008
   
-
   
$
-
     
49,934,850
   
$
779,050
     
-
   
$
-
     
40,000
   
$
4,000
   
$
42,060
   
$
(1,363,411
)
 
$
(538,301
)
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
 
 
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Statements of Cash Flows
 
                   
                   
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
   
For the Period from April 25, 2006
 
               
(Inception) to
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
December 31, 2008
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
                 
Net Loss
 
$
(360,104
)
 
$
(472,986
)
 
$
(1,363,411
)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
                       
      Stock issuable for services
   
4,000
     
22,000
     
171,780
 
      Warrants issued to employees
   
-
     
-
     
126,435
 
  Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
      (Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses
   
9,377
     
(12,500
)
   
(3,123
)
      Increase in accrued expenses and other payables
   
86,817
     
26,574
     
365,211
 
      Increase in royality agreement payable - related party
   
120,000
     
12,857
     
120,000
 
      Increase in accounts payable
   
43,629
     
12,988
     
65,750
 
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
   
(96,281
)
   
(411,067
)
   
(517,358
)
                         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
   
-
     
-
     
-
 
                         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
                       
Proceeds from Notes Payable - Stockholder
   
-
     
-
     
10,000
 
Repayments of Notes Payable - Stockholder
   
-
     
(10,000
)
   
(10,000
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
   
-
     
526,495
     
526,895
 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
   
-
     
516,495
     
526,895
 
                         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
   
(96,281
)
   
105,428
     
9,537
 
                         
Cash at Beginning of Period/Year
   
105,818
     
390
     
-
 
                         
Cash at End of Period/Year
 
$
9,537
   
$
105,818
   
$
9,537
 
                         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
                       
                         
Cash paid for interest
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
Cash paid for taxes
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON CASH ITEMS
 
During the period ended December 31, 2006, the principal stockholder contributed 1,166,650 shares of common stock to the Company as an in kind contribution of stock.  The shares were  retired by the Company.
 
In accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months. The Company has issued 2,812,500 additional shares through September 2007 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances  in the amount of $84,375 ($0.03/share).
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
 
NOTE 1       SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

(A) Organization

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (a development stage company) (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the textile and specialty fiber industries.
 
Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan, negotiating intellectual property agreements and raising capital.

(B) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(C) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

(D) Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share.”  As of December 31, 2007, the Company does not have any dilutive securities outstanding.  As of December 31, 2008, $362,494 of debt is convertible to 18,124,680 shares as per agreement with CEO.  The effect of these shares is anti-dilutive and not included in dilutive earnings per share.

(E) Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based compensation.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
(F) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”).  Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

As of December 31, 2008, and 2007 the Company has a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $1,234,136 and $874,061, respectively, available to offset future taxable income through 2028.  The valuation allowance at December 31, 2008 was $419,606. The change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was an increase of $122,426 and $159,860, respectively.

(G) Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and related interpretations as provided by SAB 107.  As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value.  Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.

Common stock, stock options and common stock warrants   issued to other than employees   or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, as required by SFAS No. 123(R), which is measured as of the date required by EITF Issue 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” In accordance with EITF 96-18, the stock options or common stock warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock on the “valuation date,” which for options and warrants related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date. Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the period over which services are to be received or the vesting period. Where expense must be recognized prior to a valuation date, the expense is computed under the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock at the end of the period, and any subsequent changes in the market price of the underlying common stock up through the valuation date is reflected in the expense recorded in the subsequent period in which that change occurs.

(H) Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
 
 
 

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
 

(I) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160, “ Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51 ”.  This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.  SFAS No. 160 affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). This statement is intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) as well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the disclosure implications of this statement.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
 
 

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. The adoption of FASB 163 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
 
(J) Reclassification
 
The 2007 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
 
NOTE 2       GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the Company is in the development stage, has a working capital deficiency and stockholders deficiency of $538,301 and used $517,358 of cash in operations from inception.  This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3     STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFCIT

(A) Common Stock Issued for Cash

On January 8, 2007 the Company issued 175,000 shares of common stock for $15,000 ($0.09/share).  This agreement was subsequently terminated effective May 23, 2007.

On January 22, 2007 the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for $103,000 ($0.09/share).   In addition, 900,000 shares were issued for $3,000 ($0.0033/share).
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
On April 4, 2007, the Company issued 187,500 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.08 per share).

On April 20, 2007, the Company issued 187,500 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.08 per share).

On April 28, 2006, the Company issued 800 shares of common stock for cash of $400 ($0.50 per share).

On May 18, 2007, the Company issued 1,312,500 shares of common stock for cash of $105,000 ($0.08 per share).

On August 28, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 8,049,500 shares common stock in the amount of $241,485 ($0.03/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 20,000 shares common stock in the amount of $600 ($0.03/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 830,000 shares common stock in the amount of $24,900 ($0.03/share).

On September 1, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 2,500 shares common stock in the amount of $75 ($0.03/share).

On September 5, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 12,000 shares common stock in the amount of $360 ($0.03/share

On September 12, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 102,500 shares common stock in the amount of $3,075($0.03/share).

In accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months. The Company has issued 2,812,500 additional shares through May 2008 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances $0.03/share.

(B) Common Stock Issued for Intellectual Property

On April 26, 2006, the Company issued 33,229,200 shares of common stock to its founder having a fair value of $180 ($0.000005/share) in exchange for intellectual property.  The fair value of the patent was determined based upon the historical cost of the intellectual property contributed by the founder.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
(C) Common Stock Issued for Services

On January 15, 2008 the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.10/share).

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 1,750,000 of common stock upon execution of the agreement. The Company also received a five-year call option from the license holder to repurchase 700,000 common shares at an exercise price of $150,000 or $.21 per share. The option gives the Company the right, but not the obligation to repurchase the shares of common stock.  The call option expires May 4, 2011. As of December 31, 2008 the value of the stock was greater then $.10 per share.  However, the Company does not have the obligation to repurchase the shares.   Accordingly, the net effect on the balance sheet is $0(See Note 4).
 
On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 70,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.08/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.  Additionally, 200,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.08/share).   As of December 31, 2008 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $10,000 ($0.10/share).

(D) Cancellation and Retirement of Common Stock

On December 29, 2006, the Company’s founder returned 1,166,650 shares of common stock to the Company.  These shares were cancelled and retired.  Accordingly, the net effect on equity is $0.

(E) Common Stock Warrants

During 2006, the Company issued 4,200,000 warrants to an officer under his employment agreement.   The Company recognized an expense of $126,435 for the period from inception to December 31, 2006.  The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants  based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2006, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 183%; risk-free interest rates of 4.98%, expected life of one year. The warrants vested immediately.   The options expire between 5 and 9 years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of between $.21 and $.40 per share. During November 2006, the Company and the officer entered into an amendment to the employment agreement whereby all the warrants were retired.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
 

 
(F)  Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows (See Note 6(A)):

·  
Common stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
   
·  
Common stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

·  
Preferred stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

(G) Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend

On March 23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock dividend to be distributed to shareholders of record on April 27, 2009.  The financial statements were not retroactively restated to reflect the stock dividend.  

NOTE 4       COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(A) Employment Agreement

On April 26, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement renews annually so that at all times, the term of the agreement is five years.  Pursuant to this agreement, the Company will pay an annual base salary of $185,000 for the period May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006.  Base pay will be increased each January 1 st , for the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent.  The officer will also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental insurance.   In addition, the officer received 700,000 five year warrants at an exercise price of $.21 per share, 1,500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $ .33 per share and 2,000,000 nine year warrants at an exercise price of $ .40 per share (See Note 3(E)).  The warrants fully vested on the date of grant.  The agreement also calls for the issuance of warrants and increase in the officer’s base compensation upon the Company reaching certain milestones:

1.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of one or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company will issue 500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.20 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 14%.

2.  
 Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of two or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company will issue 600,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 15%.

3.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of at least in part of one or more synthetic proteins, the Company will issue 900,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 18%.
 
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
4.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of at least in part of one or more proteins that are genetic modifications or induced mutations of a host silk protein, the Company will raise the executive’s base salary by 8%.

5.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $35 million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $225,000.

6.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $260,000.

7.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $100 million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $290,000.

8.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $200 million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $365,000.

9.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $350 million for over 150 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $420,000.

On November 6, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby the officer agreed to retire all stock warrants issued or to be issued under his employment agreement in return for an increase in his severance allowance to $600,000 or seventy five percent of total salary due under the remaining term of the employment agreement, which ever is greater and a death benefit of $300,000 or thirty five percent of the total salary due under the remaining term of the employment agreement.

 In addition, upon expiration or termination of the employment agreement, the Company agrees to keep the officer employed as a consultant for a period of six years at a rate of $4,000 per month with annual increases of 3%. The agreement also calls for certain increases based on milestones reached by the company, including:

1.   If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $10 million or net income exceeding $1 million for any two years within the ten year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $45 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 10 years.
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
2.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $19 million or net income exceeding $3 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $6,500 per month with a 3% annual increase.

3.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $38 million or net income exceeding $6 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $120 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $10,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

 4.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $59 million or net income exceeding $9 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $210 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $15,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

5.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $78 million or net income exceeding $12 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $320 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $20,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue interest at 7% per year.  At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $5,351.  In addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the conversion.  The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or $0.02.  As of December 31, 2008, no accrued salary has been converted to Class “A” Common Stock.  As of December 31, 2008 the Company owes $340,263 in accrued salary (See Note 5).
 
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
(B)License Agreement

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid a non-refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year anniversary of this agreement and each year thereafter.  The Company will pay an annual research fee of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4, 2007.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating to the licensed intellectual property.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company has not made the required payments and has accrued $28,752 under the agreement.  (See Note 3(C))

(C)Royalty and Research Agreements

On May 1, 2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.50 per share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock issuance.  As of December 31, 2008 the Company accrued $8,000 of accounts payable for the services provided.

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with SFAS 150, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded $120,000 in accrued expenses- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year.  At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,887.

On February 1, 2007 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for research and development for a period of one year.  As of December 31, 2008, all payments under the consulting agreement totaling $150,000 were fully paid and expensed.  In April 2008, this agreement was extended through March 31, 2009 on a cost reimbursement basis.  Reimbursements are to be made quarterly and are not to exceed $35,000.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
On February 26, 2007 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 200,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $16,000 ($0.08/share) based upon the recent cash offering price. Additionally, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.10 per share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock issuance.  As of December 31, 2008 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $10,000 ($0.10/share).  The agreement also requires the Company to issue up to 450,000 additional shares to the consultant upon the consultant reaching certain milestone events.  As of December 31, 2008, the consultant has not reached the milestone events and no additional shares are earned.
 
NOTE 5       RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matures on May 1, 2007. At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded accrued interest payable of $776.   As of December 31, 2008, the loan principle was repaid.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

 
On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with SFAS 150, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded $120,000 in royalty agreement payable- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year.  At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,887 (See Note 4 (C).

As of December 31, 2008 the Company owes $340,263 in accrued salary to principal stockholder.  On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue interest at 7% per year.  At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $5,351.  In addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the conversion.  The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or $0.02.  As of December 31, 2008, no accrued salary has been converted to Class “A” Common Stock (See Note 4(A)).

On January 1, 2007, the company entered into a one year lease agreement with an officer for office space.  The agreement calls for monthly rent of $100 plus the reimbursement to officer for internet services at $50 per month. The terms of this agreement became month-to-month on January 1, 2008. Payments under the agreement totaled $1,800 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
NOTE 6        SUBSEQUENT EVENT

(A)  Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows (See Note 3 (F)):

·  
Common stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
   
·  
Common stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

·  
Preferred stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

(B) Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend

On March 23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock dividend to be distributed to shareholders of record on April 27, 2009.  The financial statements were not retroactively restated to reflect the stock dividend.  (See Note 3 (G)).
 
 
 
 
 
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Condensed Balance Sheets
 
         
         
             
ASSETS
 
             
   
June 30, 2009
   
December 31, 2008
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
Current Assets
           
           Cash
 
$
5,402
   
$
9,537
 
Prepaid Expenses
   
8,165
     
3,123
 
Total Assets
 
$
13,567
   
$
12,660
 
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 
                 
Current Liabilities
               
         Accounts payable
 
$
144,070
   
$
65,750
 
 Payroll Tax Payable
   
1,726
     
16,933
 
 Royality agreement payable - related party
   
120,000
     
120,000
 
Accrued Expenses  - related party
   
497,440
     
348,278
 
Total Current Liabilities
   
763,236
     
550,961
 
                 
Commitments and Contingencies
               
                 
Stockholders' Deficit
               
         Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
               
      none issued  and outstanding
   
-
     
-
 
         Common stock Class A,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
               
     501,848,500 and 499,348,500 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
   
9,049,900
     
779,050
 
         Common stock Class B,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
               
     no shares issued and outstanding
   
-
     
-
 
         Common Stock Issuable, 400,000 shares
   
4,000
     
4,000
 
         Additional paid-in capital
   
42,060
     
42,060
 
         Deficit accumulated during the development stage
   
(9,845,629
)
   
(1,363,411
)
    
               
Total Stockholders' Deficit
   
(749,669
)
   
(538,301
)
                 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
 
$
13,567
   
$
12,660
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited financial statements
 
 
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                               
   
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
   
For the Period from April 25, 2006
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
   
(Inception) to
 
   
2009
   
2008
   
2009
   
2008
   
June 30, 2009
 
                               
Revenue
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
                                         
Operating Expenses
                                       
General and Administrative
   
14,201
     
24,555
     
25,448
     
49,449
     
148,151
 
Professional Fees
   
13,039
     
6,819
     
16,039
     
22,446
     
96,864
 
Officer's Salary
   
55,084
     
51,967
     
110,169
     
103,933
     
763,903
 
Contract Settlement
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
107,143
 
Payroll Taxes
   
4,398
     
3,856
     
8,612
     
7,831
     
27,376
 
Research and Development
   
51,963
     
5,261
     
57,908
     
21,186
     
432,917
 
Total Operating Expenses
   
138,685
     
92,458
     
218,176
     
204,845
     
1,576,354
 
                                         
Loss from Operations
   
(138,685
)
   
(92,458
)
   
(218,176
)
   
(204,845
)
   
(1,576,354
)
                                         
Other Income/(Expenses)
                                       
Other income
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
2,781
     
2,781
 
Interest expense
   
(10,248
)
           
(18,192
)
   
-
     
(26,206
)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)
   
(10,248
)
   
-
     
(18,192
)
   
2,781
     
(23,425
)
                                         
Net Loss before Provision for Income Taxes
   
(148,933
)
   
(92,458
)
   
(236,368
)
   
(202,064
)
   
(1,599,779
)
                                         
Provision for Income  Taxes
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
 
                                         
Net Loss
 
$
(148,933
)
 
$
(92,458
)
 
$
(236,368
)
 
$
(202,064
)
 
$
(1,599,779
)
                                         
Net Loss Per Share  - Basic and Diluted
 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
(0.00
)
       
                                         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
                                       
  during the period - Basic and Diluted
   
501,035,313
     
499,748,500
     
500,196,566
     
499,717,560
         
                                         
 
 See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited financial statements
 
 
 
 
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders Deficit
 
For the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to June 30, 2009
 
(Unaudited)
 
                                                                   
                                                             
                                       
Common Stock -
         
Deficit
Accumulated
       
   
Preferred Stock
   
Common Stock -
Class A
   
Common Stock - Class B
   
Class A Shares
To be issued
         
during
Development
       
   
Shares
   
Par
   
Shares
   
Par
   
Shares
   
Par
   
Shares
   
Par
   
APIC
   
Stage
   
Total
 
                                                                   
Balance, April 25, 2006
   
-
   
$
-
     
-
   
$
-
     
-
   
$
-
     
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued to founder
   
-
     
-
     
332,292,000
     
180
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
180
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
17,500,000
     
140,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
140,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
700,000
     
5,600
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
5,600
 
                                                                                         
Stock contributed by shareholder
   
-
     
-
     
(11,666,500
)
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.05/share)
   
-
     
-
     
4,000
     
200
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
200
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.05/share)
   
-
     
-
     
4,000
     
200
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
200
 
                                                                                         
Fair value of warrants issued
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
126,435
     
-
     
126,435
 
                                                                                         
Net Loss
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(530,321
)
   
(530,321
)
                                                                                         
Balance, December 31, 2006
   
-
     
-
     
338,833,500
     
146,180
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
126,435
     
(530,321
)
   
(257,706
)
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,750,000
     
15,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
15,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
12,000,000
     
103,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
103,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.0003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
9,000,000
     
3,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,875,000
     
15,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
15,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,875,000
     
15,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
15,000
 
                                                                                     
-
 
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
2,000,000
     
16,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
16,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
13,125,000
     
105,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
105,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
80,495,000
     
241,485
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
241,485
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
200,000
     
600
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
600
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
8,300,000
     
24,900
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
24,900
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
25,000
     
75
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
75
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
120,000
     
360
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
360
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)
   
-
     
-
     
1,025,000
     
3,075
             
-
             
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,075
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued in connection to cash offering
   
-
     
-
     
28,125,000
     
84,375
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(84,375
)
   
-
     
-
 
                                                                                         
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
600,000
     
6,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,000
 
                                                                                         
Net loss, for the year ended December 31, 2007
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(472,986
)
   
(472,986
)
                                                                                         
Balance, December 31, 2007
   
-
     
-
     
499,348,500
     
779,050
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
42,060
     
(1,003,307
)
   
(182,197
)
                                                                                         
Stock issuable for services ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
400,000
     
4,000
     
-
     
-
     
4,000
 
                                                                                         
Net loss, for the year ended December 31, 2008
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(360,104
)
   
(360,104
)
                                                                                         
Balance, for the year ended December 31, 2008
   
-
     
-
     
499,348,500
     
779,050
     
-
     
-
     
400,000
     
4,000
     
42,060
     
(1,363,411
)
   
(538,301
)
                                                                                         
 Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)
   
-
     
-
     
2,500,000
     
25,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
25,000
 
                                                                                         
Stock dividend
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
8,245,850
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(8,245,850
)
   
-
 
                                                                                         
Net loss for the period ended June 30, 2009
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(236,368
)
   
(236,368
)
                                                                                         
Balance, for the period ended June 30, 2009
   
-
   
$
-
     
501,848,500
   
$
9,049,900
     
-
   
$
-
     
400,000
   
$
4,000
   
$
42,060
   
$
(9,845,629
)
 
$
(749,669
)
 
See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited financial statements
 
 
 
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
 
(A Development Stage Company)
 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
 
(Unaudited)
 
                   
   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
   
For the Period from April 25, 2006
 
               
(Inception) to
 
   
2009
   
2008
   
June 30, 2009
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
                 
  Net Loss
 
$
(236,368
)
 
$
(202,064
)
 
$
(1,599,779
)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
                       
      Stock issuable for services
   
-
     
4,000
     
171,780
 
      Warrants issued to employees
   
-
     
-
     
126,435
 
  Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
      (Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses
   
(5,042
)
   
4,036
     
(8,165
)
      Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party
   
131,653
     
(23,587
)
   
499,166
 
      Increase in royality agreement payable - related party
   
-
     
120,000
     
120,000
 
      Increase in accounts payable
   
80,622
     
24,017
     
144,070
 
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
   
(29,135
)
   
(73,598
)
   
(546,493
)
                         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
                       
Proceeds from Notes Payable - Stockholder
   
-
     
-
     
10,000
 
Repayments of Notes Payable - Stockholder
   
-
     
-
     
(10,000
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
   
25,000
     
-
     
551,895
 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
   
25,000
     
-
     
551,895
 
                         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
   
(4,135
)
   
(73,598
)
   
5,402
 
                         
Cash at Beginning of Period
   
9,537
     
105,818
     
-
 
                         
Cash at End of Period
 
$
5,402
   
$
32,220
   
$
5,402
 
                         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
                       
                         
Cash paid for interest
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
Cash paid for taxes
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
                         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
                       
Shares issued in connection with stock dividend
 
$
8,245,850
   
$
-
   
$
8,245,850
 
                         
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON CASH ITEMS
 
During the period ended December 31, 2006, the principal stockholder contributed 11,666,500 shares of common stock to the Company as an in kind contribution of stock.  The shares were retired by the Company.
 
In accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months. The Company has issued 28,125,000 additional shares through September 2007 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances  in the amount of $84,375 ($0.003/share).
 
See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited financial statements
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
 
NOTE 1        SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

(A) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in The United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information.  Accordingly, they do not include all the information necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position and results of operations.

It is management's opinion, however that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation.  The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.

Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan and raising capital.

(B) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(C) Cash

For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

(D) Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share.”  As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company does not have any dilutive securities outstanding.
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

(E) Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based compensation.

(F) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”).  Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

(G) Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and related interpretations as provided by SAB 107.  As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value.  Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.

Common stock, stock options and common stock warrants   issued to other than employees   or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, as required by SFAS No. 123(R), which is measured as of the date required by EITF Issue 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” In accordance with EITF 96-18, the stock options or common stock warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock on the “valuation date,” which for options and warrants related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date. Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the period over which services are to be received or the vesting period. Where expense must be recognized prior to a valuation date, the expense is computed under the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock at the end of the period, and any subsequent changes in the market price of the underlying common stock up through the valuation date is reflected in the expense recorded in the subsequent period in which that change occurs.

(H) Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

 
(I) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 sets forth (1) The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have any effect on the financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 166 improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 166 will have on its financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to address (1) the effects on certain provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in SFAS 166 and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 167 will have on its financial statements.

 In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) will be the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as described in SFAS 168. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is nonauthoritative. The Codification is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

(J) Reclassification

The 2008 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.

NOTE 2        GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the Company is in the development stage, has a working capital deficiency and stockholders deficiency of $749,669 and used $546,493 of cash in operations from inception.  This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3       STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFCIT
 
(A)  Common Stock Issued for Cash

On April 28, 2006, the Company issued 8,000 shares of common stock for cash of $400 ($0.05 per share).

On January 8, 2007 the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock for $15,000 ($0.01/share).  This agreement was subsequently terminated effective May 23, 2007.

On January 22, 2007 the Company issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock for $103,000 ($0.01/share).   In addition, 9,000,000 shares were issued for $3,000 ($0.0003/share).

On April 4, 2007, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.01 per share).

On April 20, 2007, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.01 per share).
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

On May 18, 2007, the Company issued 13,125,000 shares of common stock for cash of $105,000 ($0.01 per share).

On August 28, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 80,495,000 shares common stock in the amount of $241,485 ($0.003/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 200,000 shares common stock in the amount of $600 ($0.003/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 8,300,000 shares common stock in the amount of $24,900 ($0.003/share).

On September 1, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 25,000 shares common stock in the amount of $75 ($0.003/share).

On September 5, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 120,000 shares common stock in the amount of $360 ($0.003/share).

On September 12, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 1,025,000 shares common stock in the amount of $3,075 ($0.003/share).

In accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months, the Company has issued 28,125,000 additional shares through September 2007 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances at $0.003/share.

On April 24, 2009 the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for $20,000 ($0.01/share).

On May 22, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for $5,000 ($0.01/share).

(B) Common Stock Issued for Intellectual Property

On April 26, 2006, the Company issued 332,292,000 shares of common stock to its founder having a fair value of $180 ($0.000001/share) in exchange for intellectual property.  The fair value of the patent was determined based upon the historical cost of the intellectual property contributed by the founder.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

(C) Common Stock Issued for Services

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 17,500,000 shares of common stock upon execution of the agreement. The Company also received a five-year call option from the license holder to repurchase 7,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $150,000 or $.02 per share. The option gives the Company the right, but not the obligation to repurchase the shares of common stock. The call option expires May 4, 2011. As of June 30, 2009 the value of the stock was $.02 per share. However, the Company does not have the obligation to repurchase the shares.

On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 700,000 shares of common stock upon execution. These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.01/share) based upon the recent cash offering price. Additionally, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.01/share). As of December 31, 2008, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.01/share). On January 15, 2008 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.01/share).

(D) Cancellation and Retirement of Common Stock

On December 29, 2006, the Company’s founder returned 11,666,500 shares of common stock to the Company.  These shares were cancelled and retired.  Accordingly, the net effect on equity is $0.

(E) Common Stock Warrants

During 2006, the Company issued 4,200,000 warrants to an officer under his employment agreement.   The Company recognized an expense of $126,435 for the period from inception to December 31, 2006.  The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants  based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2006, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 183%; risk-free interest rates of 4.98%, expected life of one year. The warrants vested immediately.   The options expire between 5 and 9 years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of between $.21 and $.40 per share. During November 2006, the Company and the officer entered into an amendment to the employment agreement whereby all the warrants were retired.

(F)  Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows:

·  
Common stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
·  
Common stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
·  
Preferred stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

 
(G) Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend

On March 23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock dividend.  The stock split was distributed to shareholders of record as of April 27, 2009.  A total of 449,773,650 shares of common stock were issued.  All basic and diluted loss per share and average shares outstanding information has been adjusted to reflect the aforementioned stock dividend.

NOTE 4        COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
(A) Employment Agreement

On April 26, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement renews annually so that at all times, the term of the agreement is five years.  Pursuant to this agreement, the Company will pay an annual base salary of $185,000 for the period May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006.  Base pay will be increased each January 1 st , for the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent.  The officer will also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental insurance.   In addition, the officer received 700,000 five year warrants at an exercise price of $.21 per share, 1,500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $ .33 per share and 2,000,000 nine year warrants at an exercise price of $ .40 per share (See Note 3(E)).  The warrants fully vested on the date of grant.  The agreement also calls for the issuance of warrants and increase in the officer’s base compensation upon the Company reaching certain milestones:

1.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of one or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company will issue 500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.20 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 14%.

2.  
 Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of two or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company will issue 600,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 15%.

3.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of at least in part of one or more synthetic proteins, the Company will issue 900,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 18%.
 
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

4.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of at least in part of one or more proteins that are genetic modifications or induced mutations of a host silk protein, the Company will raise the executive’s base salary by 8%.

5.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $35 million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $225,000.

6.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $260,000.

7.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $100 million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $290,000.

8.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $200 million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $365,000.

9.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $350 million for over 150 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $420,000.

On November 6, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby the officer agreed to retire all stock warrants issued or to be issued under his employment agreement in return for an increase in his severance allowance to $600,000 or seventy five percent of total salary due under the remaining term of the employment agreement, which ever is greater and a death benefit of $300,000 or thirty five percent of the total salary due under the remaining term of the employment agreement.

 In addition, upon expiration or termination of the employment agreement, the Company agrees to keep the officer employed as a consultant for a period of six years at a rate of $4,000 per month with annual increases of 3%. The agreement also calls for certain increases based on milestones reached by the company, including:

1.   If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $10 million or net income exceeding $1 million for any two years within the ten year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $45 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 10 years.
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

2.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $19 million or net income exceeding $3 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $6,500 per month with a 3% annual increase.

3.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $38 million or net income exceeding $6 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $120 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $10,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

 4.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $59 million or net income exceeding $9 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $210 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $15,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

5.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $78 million or net income exceeding $12 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $320 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $20,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue interest at 7% per year.  At June 30, 2009, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $19,377.  In addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the conversion.  The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or $0.002.  As of June 30, 2009, no accrued salary has been converted to Class “A” Common Stock.  As of June 30, 2009 the Company owes $443,625 in accrued salary (See Note 5).
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
 
(B)License Agreement

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid a non-refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year anniversary of this agreement and each year thereafter.  The Company will pay an annual research fee of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4, 2007.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating to the licensed intellectual property. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not made the required payments and has accrued $45,602 under the agreement   (See Note 3(C))
 
(C)Royalty and Research Agreements

On May 1, 2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.05 per share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock issuance.  As of June 30, 2009 the Company accrued $14,000 of accounts payable for the services provided.  These services were paid in common stock on July 1, 2009 (see Note 6).

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with SFAS 150, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of June 30, 2009, the Company has recorded $120,000 in accrued expenses- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year.  At June 30, 2009, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $6,053.

On February 1, 2007 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for research and development for period of one year at a cost of $150,000.  In April 2008, this agreement was extended through March 31, 2009 on a cost reimbursement basis.  Reimbursements are to be made quarterly and are not to exceed $35,000.  As of today, the Company is negotiating a new consulting agreement.
 
 
 

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009

 
On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 700,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.01/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.  Additionally, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.01/share).   As of December 31, 2008, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.01/share).  On January 15, 2008 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.01/share).
 
NOTE 5       RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matures on May 1, 2007. At June 30, 2009, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $776.   As of June 30, 2009, the loan principle was repaid.

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with SFAS 150, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of June 30, 2009, the Company has recorded $120,000 in royalty agreement payable- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to March 31, 2009.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year.  At June 30, 2009, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $6,053 (See Note 4 (C).

As of June 30, 2009 the Company owes $443,625 in accrued salary to principal stockholder.  On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue interest at 7% per year.  At June 30, 2009, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $19,377.  In addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the conversion.  The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or $0.002.  As of June 30, 2009, no accrued salary has been converted to Class “A” Common Stock (See Note 4(A)).
 
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
 
 
NOTE 6       SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated the events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through August 15, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.

On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 280,000 shares was approved by the board of directors as repayment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant having a fair value of $14,000 ($0.05/share) in accordance with a consulting agreement (see Note 3(C)).

On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 482,825 shares was approved by the board of directors as partial payment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant in accordance with a consulting agreement.  The total amount of issuable shares for the consultant is 882,825 shares, which includes 400,000 issuable shares previously approved by the board of directors. (see Note 3(C)).

On July 17, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with an investor group where the Company will issue up to $120,000 in convertible units.  The debentures will be in the face amount of $10,000 each, mature on December 31, 2010, bear interest at the rate of 5% simple interest per annum, payable at maturity or convertible with the principal, and the principal and interest shall be convertible at the option of the holder at a fixed price of $0.018 per share.  Each debenture shall have a warrant attached exercisable for the purchase of 500,000 shares of common stock.  The warrants shall expire on December 31, 2011, have a cashless exercise provision, and be exercisable at a fixed price of $0.02.  The agreement also requires the investment group to purchase up to $1,000,000 of common stock monthly at the lesser of $75,000 or 200% of the average daily volume multiplied by the average of the daily closing prices for the ten days immediately preceding the exercise date.  Each investment by the investment group is priced at the lowest closing “bid” price of the common stock during the five days immediately before the investment.  The term of the funding shall be the earlier of (a) the drawing down of the entire $1,000,000 or (b) 24 months after the Effective Date, July 17, 2011.  In addition, the Company is required to file and maintain an effective registration statement covering the convertible units, cannot issue more than 5% of its common stock outstanding without the investor group’s consent and must maintain a contractual relationship with a public relations firm. The Company has issued $90,000 of convertible debt to date.

On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services.  The Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $100,000 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of six months through February 3, 2010.


 
 
 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained herein, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects” and words of similar import, constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Such factors include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions: demographic changes; the ability of the Company to sustain, manage or forecast its growth; the ability of the Company to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other factors referenced in this and previous filings.

Given these uncertainties, readers of this prospectus and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

Plan of Operations
 
During the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in connection with the further development of our business and the implementation of our plan of operations:
 
»
We expect to spend up to $35,000 per quarter through March 2009 on collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at the University of Notre Dame. We believe that this research is essential to our product development. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and development within the University of Notre Dame’s laboratories. No fees have been accrued under these terms to date.
   
»
We expect to spend approximately $13,700 on collaborative research and development of high strength polymers and spider silk protein at the University of Wyoming over the next twelve months. We believe that this research is important to our product development. This level of research spending at the university is also a requirement of our licensing agreement with the university. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and development within the University of Wyoming’s laboratories.
   
»
We will actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with other university laboratories in the area of high strength polymers. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to increasing the depth of our research to include polymer production technologies that are closely related to our core research
   
»
We will consider buying an established revenue producing company which is operating in the biotechnology arena, in order to broaden our financial base and increase our research and development capability. We expect to use a combination of stock and cash for any such purchase.
   
»
We will also actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with university laboratories in areas of research which overlap the company’s existing research and development. One such potential area for collaborative research which the company is considering is protein expression platforms. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include protein expression platform technologies.

  Limited Operating History

We have not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our business through an increased investment in our research and development efforts. We cannot guarantee that the research and development efforts described in this Registration Statement will be successful. Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise, including limited capital resources, risks inherent in the research and development process and possible rejection of our products in development.
   
 
 
 
If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue expanding our operations. Equity financing will result in a dilution to existing shareholders.

Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $0.  This compares to $0 in revenue for the preceding year ended December 31, 2007.  No sales are anticipated during the next twelve months as the company will remain in the development stage.

Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $355,647. This compares to $472,864 in expenses during the year ended December 31, 2007.  Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $33,077.  This compares to $177,019 spent on research and development during the year ended December 31, 2007.  In addition, we had the following expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008: general and administrative-$74,062, professional fees-$31,066, officer’s salary-$207,866 and payroll taxes-$9,576.  This compares to the same expenses during the year ended December 31, 2007: general and administrative-$40,798, professional fees-$49,759, officer’s salary-$196,100 and payroll taxes-$9,188.
 
Capital Resources and Liquidity
 
As of December 31, 2008 we had $9,537 in cash compared to $105,818 as of December 31, 2007.
 
We believe we can not satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash.  Completion of our plan of operation is subject to attaining adequate financing.  We cannot assure investors that adequate financing will be available. In the absence of such financing, we may be unable to proceed with our plan of operations.
 
We anticipate that our operational, and general & administrative expenses for the next 12 months will total approximately $400,000. We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any significant equipment. We also do not expect any significant additions to the number of employees. The foregoing represents our best estimate of our cash needs based on current planning and business conditions. The exact allocation, purposes and timing of any monies raised in subsequent private financings may vary significantly depending upon the exact amount of funds raised and our progress with the execution of our business plan.

In the event we are not successful in obtaining financing, we may not be able to proceed with our business plan for the research and development of our products.  We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the foreseeable future. Therefore, our auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use if estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.
 
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact its financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.
  
 
 
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160, “ Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51 ”.  This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.  SFAS No. 160 affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). This statement is intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) as well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the disclosure implications of this statement.
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. The adoption of FASB 163 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
  
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).
 
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

Plan of Operations
 
During the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in connection with the further development of our business and the implementation of our plan of operations:
 
»
We expect to spend up to $35,000 per quarter through March 2010 on collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at the University of Notre Dame. We believe that this research is essential to our product development. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and development within the University of Notre Dame’s laboratories. No fees have been accrued under these terms to date.
   
»
We expect to spend approximately $13,700 on collaborative research and development of high strength polymers and spider silk protein at the University of Wyoming over the next twelve months. We believe that this research is important to our product development. This level of research spending at the university is also a requirement of our licensing agreement with the university. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and development within the University of Wyoming’s laboratories.
 
 
 
 
   
»
We will actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with other university laboratories in the area of high strength polymers. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to increasing the depth of our research to include polymer production technologies that are closely related to our core research
   
»
We will consider buying an established revenue producing company which is operating in the biotechnology arena, in order to broaden our financial base and increase our research and development capability. We expect to use a combination of stock and cash for any such purchase.
   
»
We will also actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with university laboratories in areas of research which overlap the company’s existing research and development. One such potential area for collaborative research which the company is considering is protein expression platforms. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include protein expression platform technologies.

  Limited Operating History

We have not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our business through an increased investment in our research and development efforts. We cannot guarantee that the research and development efforts described in this Registration Statement will be successful. Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise, including limited capital resources, risks inherent in the research and development process and possible rejection of our products in development.
 
If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue expanding our operations. Equity financing will result in a dilution to existing shareholders.
 
Results of Operations for the Three Months ended June 30, 2009.
 
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.  This compares to $0 in revenue for the preceding three months ended June 30, 2008.  No sales are anticipated during the next twelve months as the company will remain in the development stage.

Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $138,685. This compares to $92,458 in expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $51,963. This compares to $5,261 spent on research and development during the three months ended June 30, 2008. In addition, we had the following expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2009: general and administrative $14,201, professional fees $13,309, officer’s salary $55,084 and payroll taxes $4,398. This compares to the same expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2008: general and administrative $24,555, professional fees $6,819, officer’s salary $51,967 and payroll taxes $3,856.
 
Results of Operations for the Six Months ended June 30, 2009.
 
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.  This compares to $0 in revenue for the preceding six months ended June 30, 2008.  No sales are anticipated during the next twelve months as the company will remain in the development stage.

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $218,176. This compares to $204,845 in expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $57,908. This compares to $21,186 spent on research and development during the six months ended June 30, 2008. In addition, we had the following expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2009: general and administrative $25,448, professional fees $16,039, officer’s salary $110,169 and payroll taxes $8,612. This compares to the same expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2008: general and administrative $49,449, professional fees $22,446, officer’s salary $103,933 and payroll taxes $7,831.

Capital Resources and Liquidity
 
As of June 30, 2009 we had $5,402 in cash compared to $9,537 as of December 31, 2008.
 
We believe we can not satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash.  Completion of our plan of operation is subject to attaining adequate financing.  We cannot assure investors that adequate financing will be available. In the absence of such financing, we may be unable to proceed with our plan of operations.
 
We anticipate that our operational, and general & administrative expenses for the next 12 months will total approximately $400,000. We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any significant equipment. We also do not expect any significant additions to the number of employees. The foregoing represents our best estimate of our cash needs based on current planning and business conditions. The exact allocation, purposes and timing of any monies raised in subsequent private financings may vary significantly depending upon the exact amount of funds raised and our progress with the execution of our business plan.
 
 

 
In the event we are not successful in obtaining financing, we may not be able to proceed with our business plan for the research and development of our products.  We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the foreseeable future. Therefore, our auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

On March 23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock dividend.  The stock dividend was distributed to shareholders of record on April 27, 2009.  A total of 449,773,650 shares of common stock were issued.  All basic and diluted loss per share and average shares outstanding information has been adjusted to reflect the aforementioned stock dividend.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use if estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.
 
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact its financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.
  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 sets forth (1) The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have any effect on the financial statements.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 166 improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 166 will have on its financial statements.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to address (1) the effects on certain provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in SFAS 166 and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 167 will have on its financial statements.
 
 
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) will be the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as described in SFAS 168. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is nonauthoritative. The Codification is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
  
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).
 
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Our accountant is Webb & Company, P.A. Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. We do not presently intend to change accountants. At no time have there been any disagreements with such accountants regarding any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
 
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

Our sole executive officer and director as of September 28, 2009 is as follows:
 
NAME
AGE
POSITION
DATE APPOINTED
Kim Thompson
46
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
April 25, 2006
 
The following summarizes the occupation and business experience during the past five years for our sole officer and director.

KIM THOMPSON.
 
Mr. Thompson was a founder of the California law firm of Ching & Thompson which was founded in 1997 where he specialized in commercial litigation.  He has been a partner in the Illinois law firm of McJessy, Ching & Thompson since 2004 where he also specializes in commercial litigation.   Mr. Thompson received his bachelor’s degree in applied economics from James Madison College, Michigan State University, and his Juris Doctorate from the University of Michigan. 
  
Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.  Mr. Thompson is employed as the CEO of the company pursuant to a five year employment contract.

Our officer and director has not filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted of or been the subject of any criminal proceedings or the subject of any order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities laws within the past five (5) years.
  
Family relationships
 
None.

Term of Office
 
Our sole director was appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our sole officer was appointed by our board of directors and holds office until removed by the board
  
 
 
 
Current Issues and Future Management Expectations

No board audit committee, compensation committee, corporate governance committee or nomination committee has been formed as of the date of this prospectus. Because we only have one director, the functions and duties of all such committees will be performed by our sole director until such time as we expand our board.
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officer during the years ended December 31, 2008, and 2007 in all capacities for the accounts of our executive, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO):
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
Name and principal position
Year
 
Salary
($)
 
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
 ($)
 
Option
Awards
($)
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
 ($)
 
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
 
All Other Compensation
($)
 
Total ($)
 
Kim Thompson,
2008
 
$
  207,866
       
$
       
$
   
7,230(1)
 
$
215,096
 
President,
2007
 
$
196,100
 
  0
  0
 
$
0
 
0
 
$
0
 
 8,204(2)
 
$
204,304
 
Chief Executive Officer and Director                                          
 
 
1)
For the calendar year 2008, Kim Thompson is to receive $7,229 in medical and dental insurance pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with us.
 
2)
For the calendar year 2007, Kim Thompson is to receive $7,229 in medical and dental insurance as well as $950 for automobile expenses pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with us.
              
Employment Agreements

On April 26, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement renews annually so that at all times, the term of the agreement is five years. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company will pay an annual base salary of $185,000 for the period May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. Base pay will be increased each January 1, for the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent. The officer will also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental insurance. In addition, the officer received 700,000 five year warrants at an exercise price of $.21 per share, 1,500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $ .33 per share and 2,000,000 nine year warrants at an exercise price of $ .40 per share (See Note 3(E)). The warrants fully vested on the date of grant. The agreement also calls for the issuance of warrants and increase in the officer’s base compensation upon the Company reaching certain milestones:

1.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of one or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company will issue 500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.20 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 14%.

2.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of two or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company will issue 600,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 15%.

3.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of at least in part of one or more synthetic proteins, the Company will issue 900,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by 18%.

4.  
Upon the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber composed of at least in part of one or more proteins that are genetic modifications or induced mutations of a host silk protein, the Company will raise the executive’s base salary by 8%.
 
 

 
5.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $35 million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $225,000.
 
6.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $260,000.

7.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $100 million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $290,000.

8.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $200 million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $365,000.

9.  
Upon the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $350 million for over 150 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase to $420,000.

On November 6, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby the officer agreed to retire all stock warrants issued or to be issued under his employment agreement in return for an increase in his severance allowance to $600,000 or seventy five percent of total salary due under the remaining term of the employment agreement, which ever is greater and a death benefit of $300,000 or thirty five percent of the total salary due under the remaining term of the employment agreement.

 In addition, upon expiration or termination of the employment agreement, the Company agrees to keep the officer employed as a consultant for a period of six years at a rate of $4,000 per month with annual increases of 3%. The agreement also calls for certain increases based on milestones reached by the company, including:
  
1.   If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $10 million or net income exceeding $1 million for any two years within the ten year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $45 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 10 years.

2.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $19 million or net income exceeding $3 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $6,500 per month with a 3% annual increase.

3.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $38 million or net income exceeding $6 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $120 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $10,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.
 
 4.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $59 million or net income exceeding $9 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $210 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $15,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

5.  If the company achieves gross sales exceeding $78 million or net income exceeding $12 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $320 million for over 180 calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and his spouse at a rate of $20,000 per month with a 3% annual increase.

Outstanding Equity Awards
 
None.
 
 
 
Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Awards Table .

There were no awards made to a named executive officer in the last completed fiscal year under any LTIP
 
Compensation of Directors

Directors are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such capacity.
 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of April 14, 2009 and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.
 
 
Title of Class
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Owner
Percent of
Class (1)
       
Common Stock
Kim Thompson
120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805
Lansing, MI 48933
320,625,500
 
 
62.5%
 
 
       
Common Stock
Lion Equity
1001 Brickell Bay Dr, Suite 1812
Miami, FL 33131
45,000,000
 
 
8.8%
 
 
       
Common Stock
Sean March
8901 South Ocean Dr. #14
W. Hollywood, FL 33019
40,000,000
 
 
7.8%
 
 
       
Common Stock
All executive officers and directors as a group
320,625,500 
62.5% 
 
(1)The percent of class is based on 513,377,924 shares of our Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of September 28, 2009. 
  
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

On October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matures on May 1, 2007. At December 31, 2007, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $776. As of December 31, 2007, the loan principle was repaid.

During 2006, the Company entered into addendum to the Intellectual Property transaction and agreed to issue the CEO either 20,000 preferred shares or a payment of $120,000 (See Note 4 (C) to the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008).

On January 1, 2007, the company entered into a one year lease agreement with an officer for office space.  The agreement calls for monthly rent of $100 plus the reimbursement to officer for internet services at $50 per month.  Payments under the agreement totaled $1,800 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  The terms of this agreement became month-to-month on January 1, 2008. Payments under the agreement totaled $1,800 for the period ended December 31, 2008.
 
 

 
As of December 31, 2008 the Company owes $340,263 in accrued salary to principal stockholder.  On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue interest at 7% per year.  At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $5,351.  In addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the conversion.  The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or $0.02.  As of December 31, 2008, no accrued salary has been converted to Class “A” Common Stock.
 
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION OF INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

The General Corporation Law of Wyoming provides that directors, officers, employees or agents of  Wyoming corporations are entitled, under certain circumstances, to be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) and other liabilities actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any suit brought against them in their capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if they had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. This statute provides that directors, officers, employees and agents may also be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with a derivative suit brought against them in their capacity as a director, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification may be made without court approval if such person was adjudged liable to the corporation.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we shall indemnify any and all persons whom we shall have power to indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by the Wyoming Corporate Law. Article VII of our by-laws provides that we shall indemnify our authorized representatives to the fullest extent permitted by the Wyoming Law. Our by-laws also permit us to purchase insurance on behalf of any such person against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any capacity, or out of such person's status as such, whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under the foregoing provision of the by-laws.
 
We have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our legal counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy to a court of appropriate jurisdiction. We will then be governed by the court’s decision.




 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

88,500,000 SHARES OF CLASS ACOMMON STOCK

PROSPECTUS

YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR THAT WE HAVE REFERRED YOU TO. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL COMMON STOCK AND IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY COMMON STOCK IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
 
Until _____________, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities whether or not participating in this offering may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

The Date of This Prospectus Is:    September __, 2009
 
 
 
 
 

PART II – INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

Item. 13 Other Expenses Of Issuance And Distribution.

Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
 
$
81.48
 
Transfer Agent Fees
 
$
0
 
Accounting fees and expenses
 
$
1,000
 
Legal fees and expenses
 
$
15,000
 
Blue Sky fees and expenses
 
$
0
 
Miscellaneous
 
$
1,000
 
Total
 
$
17,081.48
 
 
All amounts are estimates other than the Commission’s registration fee. We are paying all expenses of the offering listed above. No portion of these expenses will be borne by the selling shareholders. The selling shareholders, however, will pay any other expenses incurred in selling their common stock, including any brokerage commissions or costs of sale.

Item. 14 Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
 
The General Corporation Law of Wyoming provides that directors, officers, employees or agents of  Wyoming corporations are entitled, under certain circumstances, to be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) and other liabilities actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any suit brought against them in their capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if they had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. This statute provides that directors, officers, employees and agents may also be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with a derivative suit brought against them in their capacity as a director, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification may be made without court approval if such person was adjudged liable to the corporation.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we shall indemnify any and all persons whom we shall have power to indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by the Wyoming Corporate Law. Article VII of our by-laws provides that we shall indemnify our authorized representatives to the fullest extent permitted by the Wyoming Law. Our by-laws also permit us to purchase insurance on behalf of any such person against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any capacity, or out of such person's status as such, whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under the foregoing provision of the by-laws.
 
We have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our legal counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy to a court of appropriate jurisdiction. We will then be governed by the court’s decision.

Item. 15 Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
 
We were incorporated in the State of Wyoming in April 2006 and on April 26, 2006 33,229,200 shares of our Class “A” common stock, were issued to Kim Thompson in exchange for intellectual property. These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and were issued as founder’s shares. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Mr. Thompson had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.
 
 
 
On April 28, 2006 we issued 400 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Samuel Ching at a price per share of $.50, for an aggregate of $400 cash.  On January 26, 2007 we also issued 2,100,000 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Samuel Ching at a price per share of $.0505 for an aggregate of $106,000.00.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Mr. Ching had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

On April 28, 2006 we issued 400 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Richard Duzenbury at a price per share of $.50 for an aggregate of $400 cash.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act  since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Mr. Duzenbury had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.
 
On July 5, 2006, pursuant to an Intellectual Property Agreement, we issued 1,750,000 shares of our Class “A” common stock to the University of Wyoming Foundation in exchange for intellectual property.  The Company holds a five year call, dated from May 8, 2006, 700,000 shares held by the University of Wyoming Foundation.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Mr. Duzenbury had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

On September 12, 2006, March 21, 2007 and August 1, 2007 pursuant to a Consulting Agreement, we issued an aggregate of 330,000 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Malcolm Fraser for consulting services performed.  Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Fraser is contractually restricted from reselling 175,000 shares for a period of 26 months from February 26, 2007.  In addition, the Consulting Agreement restricts Mr. Fraser from resale of 60,000 shares for a period of 24 following the commencement of public trade of the Company’s stock.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Mr. Fraser had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.


 


On January 9, 2007, we issued an aggregate of 175,000 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Worth Equity Fund, L.P., at a price per share of $0.0857, for an aggregate of $15,000 cash.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Worth Equity Fund, L.P. had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

On May 31, 2007 we issued an aggregate of 1,687,500 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Lion Equity, at a price per share of $0.08, for an aggregate of $135,000 cash.  In addition, on September 12, 2007 we issued an aggregate of 2,812,500 shares of our Class “A” common stock to Lion Equity pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, Lion Equity had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the  Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

On September 12, 2007, we completed a Regulation D Rule 506 offering in which we sold 9,016,500 shares of our Class A common stock to 32 investors, at a price per share of $.03 for an aggregate offering price $270,195. The following sets forth the identity of the class of persons to whom we sold these shares and the amount of shares for each shareholder:

Sean March
4,000,000
Nicholas G. Kontos
2,250,000
Edward M. Defeudis
830,000
Woodland Hills Fund, SA
600,000
Coral Springs Fund, SA
300,000
Kristin Lee Sirota
10,000
Ann Harvey
10,000
Barry S. Wattenberg
10,000
Lucie Rousse
10,000
Karen E. Gallagher
6,000
Kyan W. Kraus
6,000
Carlos E. Gauch
5,000
Sarah Ferreira
5,000
Caroline Sirota
5,000
Priscila Ferreira
2,500
Gene Defeudis
830,000
Heidi Thompson
5,000
Frank Thompson
5,000
Jonathan Sweet
10,000
Gary Lam
2,500
Frank Dantimo
6,000
Denise M Demarco Dantimo
6,000
Sirota & Associates PA
54,000
JR Acquisitions & Consultants
28,000
Marcos A. Lopez, Jr.
2,500
Olga C. Lopez
2,500
Camila Camargo
2,500
Bizmar Martinez
2,500
Michelle Y. Galletto
2,500
Inversiones G & G Corp.
2,500
Douglas Nicaragua
2,500
Michael L. Price
3,000
 
 
 
The Common Stock issued in our Regulation D, Rule 506 Offering was issued in a transaction not involving a public offering in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act. In accordance with Section 230.506 (b)(1) of the Securities Act, these shares qualified for exemption under the Rule 506 exemption for this offerings since it met the following requirements set forth in Reg. ss.230.506:
 
(A)
No general solicitation or advertising was conducted by us in connection with the offering of any of the Shares.
   
(B)
 
At the time of the offering we were not: (1) subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act; or (2) an “investment company” within the meaning of the federal securities laws.
   
(C)
Neither we, nor any of our predecessors, nor any of our directors, nor any beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of our equity securities, nor any promoter currently connected with us in any capacity has been convicted within the past ten years of any felony in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.
   
(D)
The offers and sales of securities by us pursuant to the offerings were not attempts to evade any registration or resale requirements of the securities laws of the United States or any of its states.
   
(E)
None of the investors are affiliated with any of our directors, officers or promoters or any beneficial owner of 10% or more of our securities.
 
Please note that pursuant to Rule 506, all shares purchased in the Regulation D Rule 506 offering completed on September 12, 2007 were restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act. In addition, each of these shareholders were either accredited as defined in Rule 501 (a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act or sophisticated as defined in Rule 506(b)(2)(ii) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
 
On August 31, 2009, we sold 366,599 shares of our Class A common stock to an existing shareholder for $3,000.  These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  These shares of our Class A common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the existing shareholder had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since he agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
 
We have never utilized an underwriter for an offering of our securities. Other than the securities mentioned above, we have not issued or sold any securities.
 
Item. 16 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
 
EXHIBIT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
3.1*
Articles of Incorporation.
3.2#
Articles of Amendment
3.3*
By-Laws.
5.1@
Opinion of Fox Law Offices, P.A.
10.1*
Employment Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Kim Thompson.
10.2*
Securities Purchase Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Worth Equity Fund, L.P. and Mutual Release.
10.3*
Securities Purchase Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Lion Equity.
10.4#
Amended Letter Agreement, dated September 14, 2009, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Calm Seas Capital, LLC.
10.5@
Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of May 8, 2006, by and between The University of Wyoming and Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
10.6@
Intellectual Property/Collaborative Research Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and The University of Notre Dame du Lac.
14.1**
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
23.1#
Consent of Webb & Company, P.A.
23.2@
Consent of Counsel, contained in Exhibit 5.1.
 
*   Filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on September 26, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

** Filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein.

 # Filed herewith.

@ To be filed by amendment.
 
 
 
 
Item 17. Undertakings.
 
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
 
(1)   To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
 
       i.       To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
 
       ii.      To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement.

       iii.     To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;
 
(2)   That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
 
(3)           To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
 
(4)           Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
 
(5)          That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:
 
i.         Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
 
(6)           That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
 
       i.       Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
 
       ii.      Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
 
       iii.     The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
 
       iv.     Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser
 
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-1 and authorized this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned on October 2, 2009.
 
 
 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
     
 
By:
/s/ Kim Thompson
   
Kim Thompson
   
President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
 
October 2, 2009 
 
/s/ Kim Thompson
   
Kim Thompson
   
President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
 
     

 
 
 
 II-6

 
Max Maxfield, WY Secretary of State
FILED: 03/18/2009 02:38 PM
Original ID:2006-000513138
Amendment ID: 2009-000744029
 
 
 

 
PROFIT CORPORATION
 
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
1 .   The name of the corporation is KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
 
2.   Article III is amended as follows:
 
The number and class of shares the company is authorized to issue are:
Unlimited shares Class A common stock at no par value
Unlimited shares of Class B common stock (no voting rights) at no par value
Unlimited shares of Preferred stock at no par value
 
3.   Article IV is amended as follows:
 
The number and class of shares that are entitled to receive the net assets upon dissolution are:
Unlimited share of Class A common stock at no par value
Unlimited snares of Class B common stock (no voting rights) at no par value
Unlimited shares of Preferred stock at no par value
 
4.   The date of the adoption of the above amendments is February 16, 2009.
 
5. The amendments were adopted by at least two-thirds of the board of directors without shareholder action and shareholder action was not required.
 
 
Date: 02/17/2009
 
  /s/ Kim Thompson
Kim Thompson
CEO

Contact: Kim Thompson
Daytime phone: 517-336-080
Exhibit 10.4
CALM SEAS CAPITAL, LLC
377 S. NEVADA ST.
CARSON CITY, NEVADA 89703

September 14, 2009

Kim Thompson, CEO
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805
Lansing, MI 48933

In Re: Proposed Equity Line Transaction - Amended Term Sheet

Dear Mr. Thompson:

This Letter is to serve as a binding Memorandum of Understanding for an Equity Line transaction by Calm Seas Capital, LLC (“Investor”) and Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with the terms and conditions on the attached Amended Term Sheet, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. You will note that the Term Sheet contains certain covenants by, and limitations upon, you, as the Company’s primary officer. If this transaction is acceptable to the Company, on the one hand, and to you, individually, on the other hand, please so indicate by signing and dating where indicated below and returning this Letter MOU to us.  In addition, please initial each of the pages of the attached Term Sheet and return it to us with the accepted Amended Letter MOU.

Yours truly,
CALM SEAS CAPITAL, LLC



By:  /s/  Michael McCarthy    


AGREEMENT and ACCEPTANCE

The foregoing Amended Letter MOU together with the attached and incorporated Amended Term Sheet is approved as of this  14th day of September, 2009:

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.


By:         /s/Kim Thompson
     Kim Thompson, CEO

KIM THOMPSON (individually)

          /s/Kim Thompson
 
 

 
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

AMENDED TERM SHEET
(September 14, 2009)

Issuer:
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (OTC BB: KBLB)

Offering:
Up to $1,000,000 in shares of Common Stock

Investor(s):
Calm Seas Capital, LLC, as lead investor, and associated entities

Bridge Investment:
$120,000, of which $100,000 shall be paid within five (5) days of the acceptance of this Term Sheet (“Commitment Date”) and the balance shall be paid prior to the filing of Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the purchase of Units consisting of Convertible Debentures and cashless Common Stock Purchase Warrants (see below). Payments of the bridge investment shall be by wire transfer

Convertible
Debentures:
The debentures shall be in the face amount of $10,000 each, mature on December 31, 2010, bear interest at the rate of 5% simple interest per annum, payable at maturity or convertible with the principal, and the principal and interest shall be convertible at the option of the holder at a fixed price of $.018 per share; the debentures cannot be repaid from the proceeds of the Equity Line

Warrants:
Each debenture shall have a warrant attached exercisable for the purchase of 500,000 shares; the warrants shall expire on December 31, 2011, have a cashless exercise provision, and be exercisable at a fixed price of $.02

Execution Date:
The Execution Date is the date on which the final documents for the Equity Line of Credit are signed by both the Company and the Investor(s)

Structure:
Equity Line of Credit, with monthly puts (1 per month) against the Commitment Amount, during the “Term”

Use of Proceeds:
Working capital, as more specifically described in the schedule and on the timeline to be attached to the final documents as the “Schedule of Use of Proceeds”

Term:
The Term shall be that period commencing with the Effective Date and ending on the earlier of (a) the drawing down of the entire Commitment Amount or (b) that date 24 months after the Effective Date

 
 
 

 
 
Commitment
Amount:
The Investor(s) shall commit to purchase up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s Common Stock over the course of no more than 24 months (the “Commitment Period”) after the date a registration statement for the resale of the Common Stock has been declared effective (the “Effective Date”) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)

First Put:
The Company may issue its first “Put Notice” during the first 5 business days of the month succeeding the month in which the Effective Date occurs

Calculation of
Put Amount:
Prior to the end of each calendar month, the Company shall determine its working capital needs (consistent with the Schedule of Use of Proceeds) and, subject to the Put Ceiling and Put Floor, by the fifth business day of the following month shall deliver to Investor(s) a “Put Notice” for the necessary amount; the date of delivery of the Put Notice shall be the “Put Date”

Put  Ceiling:
The maximum amount which the Company shall be entitled to request by each Put shall be the lesser of (a) $75,000 or (b) 200% of the average daily volume (“ADV”) multiplied by the average of the daily closing prices for the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding the Put Date.  The ADV shall be computed using the 10 trading days prior to the Put Date.

Put Floor:
The Company shall automatically withdraw that portion of the Put Notice amount if the Market Price with respect to that put does not meet the Minimum Acceptable Price, which is defined as 75% of the average closing “bid” price for the Common Stock for the 10 trading days prior to the Put Date

Put by Mutual
Agreement:
Notwithstanding the ceiling for each Put, as described above, at any time either as a part of a monthly Put or as an additional Put(s) during a month, the Company may request permission to request funds in excess of the Put Ceiling for such month and may deliver to Investor(s) a Put or Puts in excess of the Put Ceiling, which Put or Puts Investor(s) may fund, in its/their sole discretion, subject to the terms and conditions herein applicable to the monthly Puts.

Pricing Period:
The five (5) consecutive trading days immediately after the Put Date.

Market Price:
The lowest closing “bid” price of the Common Stock during the Pricing Period.

Purchase Price:
The purchase price shall be eighty percent (80%) of the Market Price.
 
 
 
 

 
 
Put Closing Date:
7 business days after the Put Date; the Investor shall make the investment required by the Put Notice, subject to the Put Ceiling, by the 7 th business day after the Put Notice, not counting the day the notice is given.  Payments of the Puts shall be made by wire transfer

Registration
Statement:
The Investor will work with the Company to have a registration statement covering the Common Stock (or a portion thereof if there is a Rule 415 cutback - see below) prepared and filed by corporate counsel as recommended by the Investor, within 75 days after the Execution Date.  Such Registration Statement shall be prosecuted with all due speed to be declared effective within 120 days after the Effective Date.

Expenses:
The Investor agrees to pay all expenses related to the preparation of the final documents to be signed on the Execution Date and all expenses related to the filing and prosecution of the Registration Statement.  The Investor will select counsel of its choice to prepare the documents.

Commitment Fee:
Waived

Rule 415
Cutback:
In the event that the SEC objects to the number of shares proposed to be registered, the Company shall use its best efforts to register the maximum number of shares permissible by the SEC to retain the status of the offering as a secondary offering under SEC Rule 415.

Equity Issuance
Restriction:
The Company agrees not to issue any equity or equity equivalents (exercisable or convertible into equity securities), including those on Form S-8, (other than those hereunder) in an amount which would exceed 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares without the prior written consent of the Investor.  This Equity Issuance Restriction will remain in effect until the earlier of (a) thirty (30) days after the issuance to Investor of all registered Common Stock, (b) thirteen (13) months after the effective date of the Registration Statement, or (c) the termination of this Equity Line of Credit

Covenants:
1.  During the Term, the Company shall maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement
2.  During the Term, the Company shall maintain its status as a company trading on the OTC BB
3.  During the Term, the Company shall timely file all required SEC reports
4.  Proceeds from the Puts shall be used only as set forth in the Schedule of Use of Proceeds without the written approval of a variation by the Investor(s)
5.  During the Term, the Company shall maintain its existing R&D contracts and relationships
6.  Company shall maintain a contractual relationship for the performance of financial public relations services for a period of 36 months from the effective date, with the extent of the costs of such services to be proportional to the size and growth of the Company
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
Short Sales:
During the Term, the Investor agrees not to engage in any short selling of the Company’s Common Stock

Exclusivity:
From the date of the execution of this Amended Term Sheet until the Effective Date, the Company shall not pursue any other transaction of the nature contemplated herein with any other person unless and until good faith negotiations with the Investor have been terminated.
Exhibit 23.1
 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated April 13, 2009 relating to the December 31, 2008 and 2007 financial statements of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts" in the Registration Statement.

 

/s/WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.
Certified Public Accountants


Boynton Beach, Florida
October 2, 2009