Item 3. Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

We have derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We have derived the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 from our audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report. Selected financial data as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2012 and 2011 have been omitted from this Annual Report because of our status as an emerging growth company under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and as per related guidance provided by the SEC. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and for the two years in the period then ended have been restated to reflect correction of errors with respect to previously unrecognized commissions due to a vendor on revenues that were recognized in 2014, 2013 and 2012; improper allocation and timing of revenue recognition from connection to supportive infrastructure in multiple element sale transactions recognized in 2014, 2013 and 2012; and previously unrecognized commissions due to a third party on cost of revenues that were recognized in 2014. For additional information, including the effect of the restatement on our financial statements for 2014 and 2013, see Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. 

Certain factors that affect the comparability of the information set forth in the following table are described in “Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Risk Related to our Business

We face risks relating to government spending and contracts with governments and governmental agencies.

Substantially all of our revenues to date have been generated from contracts with various governments around the world, including national, regional and local governmental agencies, either directly or through integrators or distributors. We expect that government contracts will continue to be a significant source of our revenue for the foreseeable future. Slowdowns, recessions, economic instability, political unrest, armed conflicts or natural disasters around the world may cause governments and governmental agencies to delay, reduce or even cancel planned spending, reduce or terminate projects, even if already budgeted, or decide to change priorities and reallocate budgets. Concerns about the financial conditions of certain governments in Europe, which may have an impact on the entire Euro zone, and the economic unrest in Russia and Eastern Europe could also adversely affect spending by certain governments.

Sales to governments and governmental agencies are subject to special risks, such as delays in funding, termination of contracts or sub-contracts at the convenience of the government, reduction or modification of contracts or sub-contracts in the event of changes in the government’s policies or priorities, as a result of budgetary constraints or for other reasons, collection difficulties, increased or unexpected costs resulting in losses or reduced profits under fixed price contracts and governmental agencies’ right to audit and investigate government contractors. Furthermore, some of our engagements require delivery in phases, and while each phase requires particular customer acceptance, a customer may require acceptance of the complete system with a right of return, regardless of any previous partial acceptance. Failure to obtain customer acceptance for the complete system, the customer’s exercise of a right of return, or, generally, an early termination for convenience, would not entitle us to reimbursement for all of our incurred contract costs or profit for work performed. While such occurrences have not happened in the past, we cannot be certain that we will not experience problems in the future in our performance of such government contracts.

In addition, the market for certain of our solutions is highly dependent on the spending cycle and scope of federal, state, local and municipal governments, as well as those of security organizations in international markets. We cannot assure you that these spending cycles will materialize as we expect and that we will be positioned to benefit from these potential opportunities.

The industry in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards and changing market potential from area to area, and if we cannot anticipate and react to such changes, our financial results may suffer.

The markets for the products we sell are characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technology, new delivery platforms, the commoditization of older technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and technological hurdles can exert pricing pressure on existing products and/or render them unmarketable or obsolete. For example, new standards for cellular networks are introduced from time to time, such as 4G networks and the proposed 5G networks. Moreover, the market potential and growth rates of the markets we serve are not uniform and are rapidly evolving.

It is critical to our success that we are able to anticipate and respond to changes in technology and industry standards and new customer challenges by consistently developing or acquiring new, innovative, high-quality products and services that meet or exceed the changing needs of our customers. See the risk factor " For certain products, components and services, we rely on third party suppliers, manufacturers and partners, and if these relationships are interrupted we may not be able to obtain substitute suppliers, manufacturers or partners on favorable terms or at all and we may be subject to other adverse effects. " We must also successfully identify, enter and prioritize areas of growing market potential, including by launching and driving demand for new and enhanced solutions and services. If we are unable to execute on these strategic priorities, or if our competitors are able to do so more rapidly, we may lose market shares or experience slower growth, and our profitability and other results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Customer adoption of these new technologies may be slower than we anticipate. We cannot assure you that the market or demand for the products and solutions we sell will be sustained or grow as rapidly as we expect (if at all), that we will successfully develop new products or introduce new applications for existing products, that such new products or applications will achieve market acceptance or that the introduction of new products or technological developments by others will not render the products in our current portfolio obsolete. See the risk factor “ Our business is changing and our revenues may in the future depend on the success of one new technology provided by a third party supplier.” In addition, certain of the products we sell must readily integrate with major third party security, telephone, front-office and back-office systems. Any changes to these third party systems could require such products to be redesigned, and any such redesign might not be possible on a timely basis or achieve market acceptance. Furthermore, some of the products we sell rely on weaknesses of commonly used protocols and if such weakness were identified and patched and we were unable to respond to such technological challenges in a timely manner, our business may be adversely affected. If we were unable to develop, license or acquire products that are competitive in technology and price and responsive to customer needs, there would be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In order to successfully compete in all sectors of our business, including security projects awarded through competitive bids, we may be required to commit to provide certain technologies and solutions which are still under development or which we will have to develop, license or acquire specifically for that customer. This may increase the risk of technological difficulties that may prevent us from complying with our contractual obligations, expose us to possible penalties and legal claims, and affect the profitability of a project, which may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is changing and our revenues may in the future depend on the success of one new technology provided by a third party supplier.

In November 2015, we introduced ULIN, a new product based on a new technology allowing for the interception of all generations of cellular communication to the market. We currently expect that ULIN will be a material growth driver for our company in 2016, that our revenues for 2016 will be more weighted towards ULIN sales, and that our future growth will be dependent on the successful implementation and customer adoption of ULIN. However, customer adoption of ULIN may be slower than we currently anticipate, and we cannot assure you that the market or demand for the ULIN system will be sustained or grow as rapidly as we expect (if at all), or that we will successfully be able to upgrade or introduce new applications for the ULIN system.

Furthermore, since the introduction of ULIN, while we have continued to offer our existing cellular interception solutions and products, we have experienced a significant decline in sales of our existing portfolio of products within the cellular interception category, in part due to customers electing to put a hold on any potential purchase orders for similar products to wait for the fully developed products based on a newer technology. We cannot assure you that ULIN will not render a substantial percentage of our existing product portfolio obsolete. If we are unable to achieve increased customer adoption of ULIN, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

All our ULIN sales are based on a reseller agreement granting us a worldwide exclusive right to sell ULIN, which automatically terminates in October 2018 and may be terminated by either party under certain specific circumstances. See "Item 4. Information on the Company - Business Overview - Manufacturing and Suppliers" for a description of the agreement. The owner of ULIN is an unrelated third party supplier and, as such, we have no ability to exert any influence over the business or employees of the supplier. Further, the supplier is a newly established corporation with a short operating history and is still unknown in the industry. If the supplier ceases operations or is unable to deliver ULIN in the quantities and quality required by us, is unable to attract or retain its key personnel or fails to adequately upgrade and develop ULIN in order for it to remain competitive, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Further, under the reseller agreement, we must obtain the supplier’s consent to, among other things, manufacture, sell or market any product which is competitive with ULIN. If the supplier does not give its timely consent to any such action, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we are investing in an upgrade of the ULIN infrastructure to accommodate the expected demand for ULIN. We do not expect that the investment in infrastructure upgrades will materially change our capital expenditures for 2016; however, it has and will continue to require significant attention from our management and other key personnel and may require expansion of our sales network to accommodate the higher value and complexity of ULIN sales as well as the currently expected demand.

We face risks relating to large projects.

The larger and more complex our customers’ projects are, the greater the risks associated with such projects. Moreover, these risks are increased due to our need to custom design our solutions to meet each customer’s specific needs. These risks may include exposure to penalties and liabilities resulting from a breach of contract, inability to fully integrate the needed products with any required third party products and inability to effectively combine various technologies into customized solutions. In some of these projects we may use domestic or overseas subcontractors for various planning aspects, solution development, integration, delivery and the successful and timely completion. We may be held liable for the failure of our subcontractors, from whom we may have no recourse. Additionally, to the extent that we cannot engage such subcontractors, partners or specialists or cannot engage them on a competitive basis, our ability to complete a project in a timely fashion or at a profit may be impaired.

We may experience fluctuations in being selected for such large projects, which correspondingly may result in substantial fluctuations in our income and results of operations, as revenues from large projects are likely to be a single occurrence and nonrecurring. In addition, there may be fluctuations in cash collection and revenue recognition with respect to such projects due to, among other things, a substantial period of time often elapsing from the time we enter into negotiations until we actually sell the project to the specific customer.

The sophisticated nature of our solutions, customization of solutions based on specific customer needs, sales cycle and unpredictable sales terms and timing may create uncertainty in, or negatively impact, our operating results and make such results more volatile and difficult to predict.

The timing of our sales cycle ranges from as little as a few weeks to more than a year. Our larger sales, which we emphasize in our sales strategy, typically require a minimum of a few months to consummate. As the length or complexity of a sales process increases, so does the risk of not successfully closing the sale. Larger sales are often made by competitive bid, which also increases the time and uncertainty associated with such opportunities. In addition, because many of our solutions are sophisticated, customers may also require education on the value and functionality of our solutions as part of the sales process, further extending the time frame and uncertainty of the process. Longer sales cycles, competitive bid processes, customizing solutions based on specific customer needs and the need to educate customers means that:

Additionally, after the completion of a sale of a specific solution or a more sophisticated product, our customers may need assistance from us in making full use of the functionality of these solutions or products, in realizing all of their benefits or in implementation generally. If we are unable to assist our customers in realizing the benefits they expect from the solutions and products that we sell, demand for such solutions and products may decline and our operating results may be adversely affected.

The extended time frame and uncertainty associated with many of our sales opportunities also make it difficult for us to accurately forecast our revenues (and attendant budgeting and guidance decisions) and increases the volatility of our operating results from period to period.

Our uneven sales patterns could significantly impact our revenues and earnings, which could cause us to not reach our forecasts.

The timing in which transactions are entered into may shift from one quarter to another, due to, among other things, a shifting by our buyers of their buying decisions, resulting in the shifting of booking and revenues from one quarter to another. Our ability to forecast our operating results from quarter to quarter is also impacted by the fact that pricing, margins, and other deal terms may vary substantially from transaction to transaction, especially across business lines. Additionally, because we emphasize larger transactions with a higher value in our sales strategy, a substantial period of time often elapses from the time we enter into negotiations until we actually sell the product to the specific customer, and the deferral or loss of one or more significant orders or a delay in a large implementation could therefore materially adversely affect our operating results, especially in a given quarter.

Further, we now expect our revenues for 2016 to be more weighted towards ULIN sales. As ULIN is a new solution with unpredictable sales cycles and a pricing model which is still being developed, our revenue visibility may be significantly reduced in the short-term, which makes it harder to provide adequate forecasts. Until we have clarity on the sales cycle, and a better understanding of the timing and implementation for a relatively small number of larger deals, we are not providing forecasts for 2016 and we are not reaffirming the forecast for 2016 previously provided in connection with the Business Combination.

We might not meet our expectations or those of industry analysts in a particular future quarter or a fiscal year, including as a result of the factors described in these Risk Factors.

If we cannot retain and recruit key personnel, our business may suffer and our ability to operate and grow our business may be impaired.

We depend on the continued service and performance of our senior management and key personnel, including Anatoly Hurgin, our Chief Executive Officer, and Alexander Aurovsky, our Chief Technology Officer, to run and grow our business. As of December 31, 2015, we employed 17 individuals on a full-time basis and 3 individuals on a part-time basis, comprised of administrators, marketing and technical personnel. Due to the size and composition of our employed staff, we rely on our ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of independent contractors within the areas of research and development, sales and marketing, to maintain and grow our business. We may not be able to continue to retain and attract such personnel and the loss of the services of these persons could adversely affect our business. Members of our senior management team may resign at any time (subject to applicable contractual advance notice periods).

To remain successful and to grow, we also need to retain existing employees and attract new employees who understand and/or have experience with our solutions, products, services and markets, especially new markets and growth areas we may enter. As we grow, we must also enhance and expand our management team to execute on new and larger agendas and challenges and recruit and retain qualified engineers and project managers to perform research and development and to commercialize the products we sell, as well as qualified personnel to market and sell those products. The market for qualified personnel is competitive in the geographic markets in which we operate and may be limited especially in areas of emerging technology, and we may be at a competitive disadvantage to companies with greater brand recognition or financial resources in recruiting. An inability to attract and retain highly qualified employees may have an adverse effect on our ability to develop new products and enhancements for existing products and to successfully market such products, all of which would likely have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position. Moreover, if we are not able to properly balance investment in personnel with growth in our business, our profitability may be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully recruit and integrate new employees. There is often intense competition to recruit highly skilled employees in the technology industry, and we may not be able to offer current and potential employees a compensation package that is satisfactory in order to retain or recruit them.

We are subject to complex, evolving regulatory requirements that may be difficult and expensive to comply with and that could negatively impact our business.

Our business and operations are subject to regulatory requirements in Israel and elsewhere, including, among other things, with respect to government contracts, export control, labor, tax, anti-corruption, data privacy and protection, and communications monitoring and interception. Regulatory requirements are subject to constant change that may have a material impact on our operations. Compliance with these regulatory requirements may be onerous, time-consuming, and expensive, especially where these requirements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction or where the jurisdictional reach of certain requirements is not clearly defined or seeks to reach across national borders. Regulatory requirements in one jurisdiction may make it difficult or impossible to do business in another jurisdiction. We may also be unsuccessful in obtaining permits, licenses or other authorizations required to operate our business, such as for the marketing or sale or import or export of products and services.

We cannot assure you that our methods of and policies for doing business will be adequate for new markets, including the United States, or that we will be able to modify such methods or policies in a manner that allows us to enter into specific markets, including the United States. Violations of applicable laws or regulations may harm our reputation and deter governmental agencies and other existing or potential customers or partners from purchasing our solutions. Furthermore, non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, damages, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, restrictions on the conduct of our business, and damage to our reputation.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by changes in the legal and regulatory environment.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if laws, regulations or standards relating to our business and products, us or our employees (including labor laws and regulations) are implemented or changed. Among these laws and regulations, there are requirements in Israel and other territories in relation to import and export controls, data privacy and protection, anti-bribery and anti-corruption, labor, tax and environmental and social issues. While we make every effort to comply with such requirements, we cannot assure you that we will be fully successful in our efforts, and that our business will not be harmed. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in fines, damages, civil liability and criminal sanctions against us, our officers and our employees, prohibit us from conducting our business and damage our reputation.

The occurrence of privacy or information security breaches (or the belief that any such breach has occurred) in the operation of our business or by third parties using a product or solution obtained through us could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Some of our customers use the products to compile and analyze highly sensitive or confidential information. We may come into contact with such information or data when we perform service or maintenance functions for our customers. The perception or fact that any of our employees has improperly handled sensitive information of a customer or a customer’s end user or consumer could negatively impact our business. If, in handling this information, we fail to comply with applicable privacy legislation or procedures, we could incur civil liability to governmental agencies or any customers and individuals whose privacy was compromised. Further, there are growing compliance and regulatory initiatives and changes for governments around the world that are driven by events and concerns such as accounting scandals, security threats and economic conditions.

While we attempt to prepare in advance for these new initiatives and standards, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in our efforts, that such changes will not negatively affect the demand for the products and services we offer, or that our competitors will not be more successful or prepared than us. Alternatively, a reduction in the implementation of compliance and regulatory requirements in the industries in which we operate could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may be limited in our ability to transfer or outsource certain aspects of our business to certain jurisdictions, and may be limited in our ability to undertake development activities in certain jurisdictions, which may impede our efficiency and adversely affect our business results of operations.

For certain products, components and services, we rely on third party suppliers, manufacturers and partners, and if these relationships are interrupted we may not be able to obtain substitute suppliers, manufacturers or partners on favorable terms or at all and we may be subject to other adverse effects.

Although we generally use standard parts and components in our products, we do rely on non-affiliated suppliers and original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, partners for certain non-standard products or components which may be critical to our products, including both hardware and software, and on manufacturers of assemblies that are incorporated into our products. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, payments to our three largest suppliers comprised 70%, 79% and 55% of cost of revenues, respectively, and one supplier accounted for 43%, 33% and 34% of cost of revenues in such periods, respectively. 

In October 2015, we entered into an agreement with a third party supplier who designs and licenses the ULIN products. This agreement may in the future account for a significant portion of our vendor costs as well as our revenue generation. See the risk factor “Our business is changing and our revenues may in the future depend on the success of one new technology provided by a third party supplier.”

Due to our limited staff, our competitiveness, business and future growth is highly dependent on research and development activities performed by external suppliers and contractors, and our ability to retain exclusive access to these suppliers and contractors as well as their technology. Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers involves risks. In the event that a key supplier, including in particular the supplier of ULIN, ceases operations or otherwise ceases to do business with us, it may take a substantial amount of time and expense for us to secure substitute suppliers. We also purchase technology, license intellectual property rights and oversee third party development and localization of certain products and components, in some cases, by or from companies that may compete with us or work with our competitors. While we endeavor to use larger, more established suppliers, manufacturers and partners wherever possible, in some cases, these providers may be smaller, less established companies, particularly in the case of suppliers of new or unique technologies that we have not developed internally, such as ULIN. In addition, in certain cases, we are dependent on sole-source suppliers for some components. If any of these sole-source suppliers fails to meet our needs, we may not have readily available alternatives. Our ability to fill our supply needs could jeopardize our ability to satisfactorily and timely complete our obligations under our government and other contracts.

If these suppliers, manufacturers or partners experience financial, operational, manufacturing capacity or quality assurance difficulties, cease production and sale of the products we buy from them entirely, or there is any other disruption, including loss of license, OEM or distribution rights, including as a result of the acquisition of a supplier or partner by a competitor, we will be required to locate alternative sources of supply or manufacturing, to internally develop the applicable technologies, to redesign our products and/or to remove certain features from our products, any of which would be likely to increase expenses, create delivery delays and negatively impact our sales. Although we endeavor to put in place contracts with key providers, and attempt to identify redundant suppliers for particular components, we may not be able to enter into such contracts or purchase from redundant suppliers. If we are able to enter into such contracts we may not be successful in obtaining adequate protections, these agreements may be short-term in duration and the counterparties may be unwilling or unable to stand behind such protections. Moreover, these types of contractual protections offer limited practical benefits to us in the event our relationship with a key provider is interrupted. In addition, by utilizing third party suppliers, manufacturers and partners, we run the risks that the reputation and competitiveness of the products and services we offer may deteriorate as a result of the reduction of our control over quality and delivery schedules and the consequent risk that we will experience supply interruptions and be subject to escalating cost; and our competitiveness may be harmed by the failure of our subcontractors to develop, implement or maintain manufacturing methods appropriate for our product portfolio and our customers. Moreover, because most of our contracts are with governments and governmental agencies, we may be limited in the third parties we can engage as component manufacturers due to security clearance requirements.

Further, as suppliers discontinue their products, modify them in manners incompatible with our current use or use manufacturing processes and tools that could not be easily migrated to other vendors, we could have significant delays in product availability, which would have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Although we believe that we can obtain alternative sources of supply in the event our suppliers are unable to meet our requirements in a timely manner, we cannot assure you that our alternative sources of supply would be sufficient to avoid a material interruption or delay in deliveries and in availability of spare parts.

We face risks related to the concentration of third party resellers and direct customers with whom we do business and, if we are unable to establish and maintain our relationships with such resellers and customers, our business and ability to grow could be materially adversely affected.

We conduct business with a relatively small number of third party resellers (i.e., resellers, distributors and system integrators) and direct customers, each of which could be material to our business. With respect to sales in many regions and countries, we sell to third party resellers that, in turn, resell our products to various security and intelligence agencies, military forces, law enforcement agencies and homeland security agencies. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, one significant reseller accounted for 66%, 33% and 65% of our revenues, respectively, and one other reseller in each such fiscal period accounted for 13%, 29% and 17% of our revenues, respectively. We expect that our sales to relatively few significant resellers and customers could continue to account for a substantial percentage of our sales in the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain these key resellers and customers or that such resellers and customers will not cancel purchase orders, reschedule or decrease their level of purchases. Loss, cancellation, deferral of business by, or failure to receive new contracts, renewals or follow-on contracts from, such resellers and customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

To remain successful, we must maintain our existing relationships as well as identify and establish new relationships with other third party resellers. We must often compete with other suppliers for these relationships and our competitors often seek to establish exclusive relationships with these sales channels or to become a preferred partner for them. Our ability to establish and maintain our relationships is based on, among other things, factors that are similar to those on which we compete for end customers, including features, functionality, ease of use, installation, maintenance and price.

As our market opportunities change, our reliance on particular distribution channels and strategic partners may increase or we may need to create new strategic partnerships and alliances to address changing market needs, all of which may negatively impact our growth and gross margins. Certain of our current distribution channel partners or strategic partners currently compete with us or may enter into our markets in competition with us, which could result in the termination of our relationship with them or lead to a significant reduction in sales through related channels. In addition, certain of the suppliers of material components of our products offer their own competing products. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining, creating or expanding these channels and partnerships.

In addition, the execution of our growth strategy also depends on our ability to create new alliances and enter into strategic partnerships with certain market players and in certain markets. Even if we are able to enter into such alliances, it may be under terms that are not favorable to us, or we may not be able to realize the benefits that are anticipated through such alliances. If we are not successful at these efforts, we may lose sales opportunities, customers and market share, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our solutions may contain defects or may be vulnerable to cyber-attacks, which could expose us to both financial and non-financial damages.

Many of our existing solutions are, and future solutions are expected to be, sophisticated and may develop operational problems. New products and new product versions, and the incorporation of third party products into our solutions, also give rise to the risk of defects or errors. These defects or errors may relate to the operation or the security of the products and could result in product returns, loss of or delay in market acceptance of the products, loss of our competitive position or claims by customers or others, which would seriously harm our revenues, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even well-designed and tested products may be vulnerable to cyber-attacks. If we do not discover and remedy such defects, errors or other operational or security problems until after a product has been released to customers, we may incur significant costs to correct such problems and/or become liable for substantial damages for product liability claims or other liabilities. Furthermore, correcting and repairing such errors, failures or defects could also require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions, delays or cessation of our product licensing. The identification of errors in the products we sell (including components provided by third party suppliers), the detection of bugs by our customers, or a successful cyber-attack on one of the products even absent a defect or error, may damage our reputation in the market as well as our relationships with existing customers, which may result in our inability to retain our customers or attract new customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our results or financial condition.

We are dependent on the efforts of contractors for projects in which we serve as subcontractor.

For certain projects, we act as subcontractors and depend on the conduct of and our relationship with the relevant general contractors. If one or more of these contractors experience financial or operational difficulties, we could experience an interruption in our operations. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our contractors arising from, among other things, the quality and timeliness of work performed by us, in which case our operating results could temporarily suffer until such disputes are resolved. Furthermore, disagreements with our contractors could lead to the assertion of rights and remedies under their contracts and increase the cost of the project or result in a contractor’s unwillingness to perform further work on the project. If any contractor is unable or unwilling to perform according to the negotiated terms and timetable of its own agreement for any reason or terminates the agreement, we may be required to be engaged by a substitute contractor in order to continue our work on the project, which would likely result in significant project delays and increased costs.

Our employees or other third parties may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which could cause significant liability for us and harm our reputation.

We are exposed to the risk that our employees, independent contractors, consultants or distributors may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activities. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to us that violates export control laws or other regulations or manufacturing standards. Furthermore, the protection of our proprietary data and that of our clients is critical to our reputation and the success of our business. Our clients have a high expectation that we will adequately protect their confidential information. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to such data or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential data, whether through systems failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients.

We are subject to the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which generally prohibits U.S. companies as well as foreign companies with a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange in the United Sates or quoted on the over-the-counter market in the United States from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices occur from time to time in certain countries. We can make no assurance, however, that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties and other consequences that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct or negligence by employees and other third parties, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws, regulations or contractual obligations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.

Ability’s sales and marketing efforts are negatively affected by customer confidentiality obligations.

Substantially all of Ability’s customers do not permit Ability to identify them as customers due to the sensitive nature of Ability’s products and the projects it undertakes on their behalf, including due to national security concerns for certain government customers. Accordingly, Ability is not able to identify its customers in its marketing and sales materials or the specific purpose for which certain products were sold or projects were undertaken. Moreover, Ability is unable to use substantially all of its customers as referral sources. These limitations could adversely affect Ability’s marketing and sales efforts.

Because many of our contracts and projects are classified for national security reasons, we may not be able to provide important information to the public.

To date, a majority of our revenue has been derived from contracts which are classified by certain governments for national security reasons. Therefore, we are prohibited from filing these contracts as exhibits to our reports, registration statements and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in our press releases. The specific aspects of our technologies are highly sensitive to ongoing military operations, homeland security issues and criminal activity and are largely classified under our customers’ guidelines and, consequently, cannot be disclosed publicly. Such absence of explanation, detail and discussion may prohibit us from providing details that an investor may find meaningful, cause many individuals and investors to question our level of disclosure and discourage potential investors from investing in our securities. Accordingly, investors may not have important information concerning our businesses and operations with which to make an informed investment decision.

We are subject to risks associated with doing business globally.

Currently, all of our operations are outside of the United States. The countries and regions in which we have our most significant foreign operations include Latin America, Israel (mainly to resellers in Israel that sell to end users outside of Israel) and Asia, and we intend to continue to expand our operations internationally. We sell throughout the world and intend to continue to increase our penetration of international markets. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 84%, 68% and 89% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from sales to customers outside of Israel and the remainder of our sales were to customers in Israel, however, for each such period, most of Israeli sales represent sales to Israeli integrators that have sold to end users outside of Israel. Our operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business globally and under the laws, regulations and customs of various jurisdictions and geographies. We believe our business may suffer if we are unable to successfully expand into new regions, as well as maintain and expand our existing foreign operations. In addition to risks related to currency exchange rate fluctuations, risks that affect our foreign operations include changes in exchange controls, changes in taxation and potentially adverse tax consequences in operating in certain countries, import limitations, policies and procedures that protect local suppliers, recruitment and retention of foreign employees, export control restrictions, changes in or violations of applicable law or regulations, economic and political instability, disputes between countries, diminished or insufficient protection of intellectual property, competition in foreign countries, product customization or localization issues, challenges in collection of accounts receivable and longer payment cycles, and disruption or destruction of operations in a significant geographic region regardless of cause, including war, terrorism, riot, civil insurrection or social unrest. Any of these risks could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As we continue to explore the expansion of our global reach, an increasing focus of our business may be in emerging markets. In many emerging markets, we may face risks that are more significant than if we were to do business in developed countries, including risks relating to underdeveloped legal systems, unstable governments and economies, and potential governmental actions affecting the flow of goods and currency. We cannot assure you that one or more of these factors will not have a material adverse effect on our international operations, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Intense competition in our markets and competitors with greater resources than us may limit our market share, profitability and growth.

We face aggressive competition from numerous and varied competitors in all of our markets, making it difficult to maintain our market share, remain profitable, invest and grow. We will also encounter new competitors as we expand into new markets. Our competitors may be able to more quickly develop or adapt to new or emerging technologies, better respond to changes in customer needs or preferences, better identify and enter into new areas of growth or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products. Some of our competitors have, in relation to us, longer operating histories, larger customer bases, longer standing relationships with customers, superior brand recognition and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, customer service, public relations, distribution or other resources, especially in new markets we may enter. Consolidation among our competitors may also improve their competitive position. In addition, system integrators, as well as infrastructure vendors, may decide in the future to enter our market space and compete with us by comprehensive solutions. We also face competition from solutions developed internally by our customers. To the extent that we cannot compete effectively, our market share and, therefore, results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Because price and related terms are key considerations for many of our customers, we may, from time to time, have to accept less-favorable payment terms, lower our sales prices, and/or reduce our cost structure, including reducing headcount or investment in research and development, in order to remain competitive. If we are forced to take these kinds of actions to remain competitive in the short-term, such actions may adversely impact our ability to compete in the long-term. Prices for some of our solutions have decreased throughout the market in recent years, primarily due to competitive pressure. We cannot assure you that the prices of those or other solutions will not continue to decrease or that our gross profit will not decrease as a result.

New potential entrants to our markets may lead to the widespread availability and standardization of some of the products and services, which could result in the commoditization of the products and services we offer, reduce the demand for such products and services and drive us to lower our prices.

Incorrect or improper use of the products and solutions in our portfolio or failure to properly provide professional services and maintenance services could result in negative publicity and legal liability.

The products and solutions we sell are complex and are deployed in a wide variety of network environments. The proper use of these products requires training and, if the products are not used correctly or as intended, insufficient results may be produced. The products may also be intentionally misused or abused by our customers. The incorrect or improper use of these products and solutions or our failure to properly provide professional services and maintenance services, including installation, training, project management, product customizations and consulting to our customers may result in losses suffered by our customers, which could result in negative publicity and product liability or other legal claims against us.

Furthermore, the use of our solutions by a government to conduct interception in violation of such government’s laws could result in negative publicity or even legal claims against us. Public incidents, such as the attack on, and infiltration of, Google Inc.’s corporate infrastructure, suspected to have been sponsored by a foreign government, and the various data leaks publicized by WikiLeaks, have demonstrated the societal pressures and legal issues regarding the use of surveillance and interception technologies by governments.

For certain products, we rely on software from third parties. If we lose the right to use that software, we would have to spend additional capital to redesign our existing software to adhere to new third party providers or develop new software.

We integrate and utilize various third party software products as components of our products and solutions to enhance their functionality. Our business could be disrupted if functional versions of these software products were either no longer available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, some of our third party vendors use proprietary technology and software code that could require significant redesign of our products in the case of a change in vendor. If we lost the right to use such third party software, we would be required to spend additional capital to either redesign our software to function with alternate third party software or develop these components ourselves. As a result, we might be forced to limit the features available in our current or future products and solutions offerings and the commercial release of our products and solutions could be delayed.

Furthermore, if we were required to or otherwise determined to utilize software components from certain jurisdictions, such as Israel, local export control laws would impose a regulatory burden that may materially affect our business and operations.

Political or public perception factors may adversely affect our business.

We may experience negative publicity or other adverse impacts on our business if we sell to countries that are considered disfavored by the media or political or social rights organizations even though such transactions may be permissible under applicable law.

Our business may be impacted by changes in general economic conditions.

Our business is subject to risks arising from changes in domestic and global economic conditions, and adverse economic conditions in markets in which we operate may harm our business. If our clients significantly reduce spending in areas in which our solutions are utilized, or prioritize other expenditures over our solutions, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

Disruption to the global economy could also result in a number of follow-on effects on our business, including a possible slow-down resulting from lower customer expenditures; inability of customers to pay for products and services on time, if at all; more restrictive export regulations which could limit our potential customer base; negative impact on our liquidity, financial condition and share price, which may impact our ability to raise capital in the market, obtain financing and secure other sources of funding in the future on terms favorable to us.

In addition, the occurrence of catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, storms, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods and other catastrophes that adversely affect the business climate in any of our markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Some of our operations are located in areas that have been in the past, and may be in the future, susceptible to such occurrences.

Our future success depends on our ability to enhance our existing operations, execute on our growth strategy and properly manage investment in our business and operations.

We have experienced significant growth in recent years and our existing infrastructure, systems, processes, and personnel may not be adequate for our current or future needs. A key element of our strategy is to continue to invest in, enhance and secure our business and operations and grow, both organically and through acquisitions. Investments in, among other things, new markets, new products, solutions, and technologies, research and development, infrastructure and systems, geographic expansion and headcount are critical components in achieving this strategy. Our ability to implement this portion of our growth strategy is dependent on our ability to market solutions and products on a larger scale, increase our brand recognition and enter into distribution and other strategic arrangements with third party suppliers and distributors, as well as manage growth in administrative overhead and distribution costs likely to result from our possible geographic expansion, particularly in Europe and the United States.

However, such investments and efforts may not be successful, especially in new areas or new markets in which we have little or no experience, and even if successful, may negatively impact our short-term profitability. Our success depends on our ability to effectively and efficiently enhance our existing operations and execute on our growth strategy, balance the extent and timing of investments with the associated impact on expenses and profitability, balance our focus between new areas or new markets and the operation and servicing of our legacy businesses and customers, capture efficiencies and economies of scale and compete in the new areas or new markets and with the new solutions in which we have invested. If we are unable to effectively and efficiently enhance our existing operations, execute on our growth strategy and properly manage our investments, focus and expenditures, our results of operations and market share may be materially adversely affected.

Our acquisition and investment activities present certain risks to our business, operations and financial position.

We expect that acquisitions and investments will be a part of our growth strategy. Successful execution following the closing of an acquisition or investment is paramount to achieving the anticipated benefits of the transaction. The process for acquiring a company may take from several months up to a year and costs can vary greatly. We may also compete with others to acquire companies, and such competition may result in decreased availability of, or an increase in price for, suitable acquisition candidates. In addition, we may not be able to consummate acquisitions or investments that we have identified as crucial to the implementation of our strategy for other commercial or economic reasons. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to identify suitable acquisition or investment targets or to consummate acquisitions or investments on acceptable terms or at all. If we are not able to execute on our acquisition strategy, we may not be able to achieve our growth strategy and may lose market shares.

The process of integrating an acquired company’s business or new technologies is challenging and may result in expected or unexpected operating or compliance challenges, which may require significant expenditures and a significant amount of our management’s attention that would otherwise be focused on the ongoing operation of our business. These potential difficulties or risks include, among others:

Acquisitions and/or investments may also result in the expenditure of available cash and amortization expenses or write-downs related to intangible assets such as goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. Investments in immature businesses with unproven track records and technologies have an especially high degree of risk, with the possibility that we may lose the value of our entire investment or incur additional unexpected liabilities. Large or costly acquisitions or investments may also diminish our capital resources and liquidity or limit our ability to engage in additional transactions for a period of time.

All of the foregoing risks may be magnified as the cost, size or complexity of an acquisition or acquired company increases, or where the acquired company’s products, market or business are materially different from ours, or where more than one integration is occurring simultaneously or within a concentrated period of time.

We may not be able to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, including those of antitrust authorities and foreign investment authorities, in countries where we seek to consummate acquisitions or make investments. For those and other reasons, we may ultimately fail to consummate an acquisition, even if we announce the intended acquisition.

In addition, in the future we may require significant financing to complete an acquisition or investment, whether through bank loans, raising of debt or otherwise. We cannot assure you that such financing options will be available to us on reasonable terms, or at all. If we are not able to obtain such necessary financing, it could have an impact on our ability to consummate a substantial acquisition or investment and execute our growth strategy. Alternatively, we may issue a significant number of shares as consideration for an acquisition, which would have a dilutive effect on our existing shareholders.

The mishandling or the perceived mishandling of sensitive information could harm our business.

The products we sell are in some cases used by customers to compile and analyze highly sensitive or confidential information and data, including information or data used in intelligence gathering or law enforcement activities. While our customers’ use of the products in no way affords us access to the customer’s sensitive or confidential information or data, we or our partners may receive or come into contact with such information or data, including personally identifiable information, when we are asked to perform services or support functions for our customers. We or our partners may also receive or come into contact with such information or data in connection with the use of our solutions. We have implemented procedures and use information technology systems to help ensure the proper handling of such information and data. However, these measures are designed to mitigate the risks associated with handling or processing sensitive data and cannot safeguard against all risks at all times. The improper handling of sensitive data, or even the perception of such mishandling (whether or not valid), or other security lapses by us or our partners or within the products, could reduce demand for such products or otherwise expose us to financial or reputational harm or legal liability.

Developing and marketing of applications of the products we sell for commercial use are subject to risks and uncertainties.

We believe there are potential applications of the technology underlying the products in our portfolio for commercial use, although we currently do not have specific plans to pursue such commercial applications. If, however, we determine to pursue commercial applications of the products, we may be exposed to additional risks related to the sale for commercial use. These risks may include additional regulatory restrictions and a different competitive environment. The marketing for commercial use may also require marketing personnel with skills that are different from those held by our current marketing staff. The need to comply with additional regulatory restrictions or hire additional marketing personnel could negatively impact our business or results of operations.

We are considering entering into the U.S. market, which may expose our business to additional risks.

We are considering entry into the U.S. market. In order to do so, we believe we must establish a relationship with a local U.S. market participant that has existing relationships with potential customers and distribution capabilities. We will also need to develop a strategy to differentiate the product we offer for sale within the United States from those outside of the United States so that any non-U.S. products do not fall under U.S. export control restrictions. Upon entering the U.S. market, we may become subject to additional U.S. regulatory requirements. As we anticipate that our future sales in the United States will be made primarily to U.S. governmental agencies, we will be further exposed to all of the risks related to government contracts. See the risk factor “ We face risks relating to government spending and contracts with governments and governmental agencies ” above. There can be no assurance that we will develop a successful strategy to enter the U.S. market, or that we will be able to enter or successfully compete in that market.

In addition, the entrance into the U.S. market will also expose us to risks relating to U.S. regulatory requirements regarding customer use of the products. For example, in September 2015, the U.S. Justice Department announced a new policy requiring federal law enforcement officials to obtain a search warrant prior to using secretive and intrusive cell-phone tracking technology. This new policy could make the U.S. market less attractive to us and could adversely affect demand for the products we offer in the United States. We believe that the current regulatory environment, specifically privacy issues, in the United States is challenging and see more opportunities for sales in Asia and Latin America in the near-term. As a result, we plan to be conservative in our approach to the U.S. market.

Risks Related to our Operations in Israel

Conditions in Israel affect our operations and may limit our ability to produce and sell our products.

Our headquarters is located in the State of Israel. Political, economic and military conditions in Israel directly affect our operations. Since the State of Israel was established in 1948, the State of Israel and its economy had experienced significant growth and expansion, coupled with an increase in the standard of living, and has developed one of the most advanced high-tech industries in the world. However, it continues to face many geo-political and other challenges that may affect companies located in Israel, such as ours. For example, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Although Israel has entered into various peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan as well as comprehensive agreements with the Palestinian Authority, there continues to be unrest and terrorist activity in Israel with varying levels of severity, as well as ongoing hostilities and armed conflicts between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and other groups in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The effects of these hostilities and violence on the Israeli economy and our operations are unclear, and we cannot predict the effect on us of a further increase in these hostilities or any future armed conflict, political instability or violence in the region. We could be harmed by any major hostilities involving Israel, the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its trading partners, boycotts or a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel. In the event of war, we and our Israeli aftermarket product subcontractors and suppliers may cease operations, which may cause delays in the distribution and sale of our aftermarket products. In the event that our principal executive office is damaged as a result of hostile action, or hostilities otherwise disrupt the ongoing operation of our offices, our ability to operate could be materially adversely affected. The impact of Israel’s relations with its Arab neighbors in general, or on our operations in the region in particular, remains uncertain. The establishment of new fundamentalist Islamic regimes or governments more hostile to Israel could have serious consequences for the stability in the region, place additional political, economic and military confines upon Israel, materially adversely affect our operations and limit our ability to sell our products to countries in the region.

Additionally, several countries, principally in the Middle East, still restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries and groups have imposed or may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies if hostilities in Israel or political instability in the region continues or increases. These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain manufactured components and raw materials from these countries or sell our products to companies in these countries. Furthermore, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement, a global campaign attempting to increase economic and political pressure on Israel to comply with the stated goals of the movement, may gain increased traction and result in a boycott of Israeli products and services. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners, or significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to stringent export control regulations.

The Israeli government has adopted and amended laws and regulations regarding military and defense export controls, as well as the export of “dual use” items, and many of our suppliers are subject to national export regimes. Some of the solutions we offer incorporate decryption technology, which is subject to Israeli export control and may also be subject to non-Israeli export control when supplied from non-Israeli suppliers. If the required government approvals are not obtained, our ability to market, sell and export the products could be negatively impacted, which would result in a reduction in our revenues.

Certain of our activities are exempt from Israeli export control under the current export control regime as these activities do not involve the export of Israeli-controlled items from Israel, but rather the sale by us of items of non-Israeli origin (as such term and items are defined by the Israeli Defense Export Control Law, 5766-2007 (the “2007 Law”), to non-Israeli entities, which activities are referred to as “Brokerage” under the 2007 Law. This exemption is due to the fact that the chapter of the 2007 Law relating to Brokerage transactions has not entered into force to date. If such Chapter were to enter into force and apply to Brokerage transactions (even if such Brokerage does not involve the export of controlled goods from Israel), we may be required to obtain additional licenses or modify our method of doing business in the future.

The tax benefits that are available to Ability under Israeli law require it to meet various conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which could increase its Israeli tax liability.

Ability is eligible for certain tax benefits provided to “Preferred Enterprises” under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the “Investment Law”). The standard corporate tax rate for Israeli companies was 25% in 2012 and 2013, was increased to 26.5% for 2014 and 2015 and was reduced to 25% for 2016 and thereafter. Due to Ability’s “Preferred Enterprise” status, Ability expects to benefit from a reduced tax rate of 16% in 2015 and thereafter with respect to taxable income generated by the Preferred Enterprise, and all other taxable income will be subject to the standard corporate tax rate. If these tax benefits are reduced, cancelled or discontinued, for whatever reason, including lack of compliance with the requirements of the Investment Law, Ability’s Israeli taxable income would be subject to standard Israeli corporate tax rates and it may be required to pay incremental taxes over the reduced tax rates under the Preferred Enterprise as discussed above, plus indexation, interest and possibly penalties thereon. Additionally, if Ability increases its activities outside of Israel through acquisitions, for example, Ability’s expanded activities outside of Israel might not be eligible for inclusion in future Israeli tax benefit programs. The Israeli government may furthermore independently determine to reduce, phase out or eliminate entirely the benefits available under the Investment Law, which could also adversely affect Ability’s global tax rate and the results of its operations.

Risks Relating to Incorporation in the Cayman Islands

As we are a Cayman Islands company, it could be difficult for investors to effect service of process on and recover against us or our directors and officers, and our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interest and rights through the U.S. federal courts.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company, and most of our officers and directors are residents of various jurisdictions outside the United States. A substantial portion of our assets and the assets of our officers and directors, at any one time, are and may be located in jurisdictions outside the United States. Further, we have no agent for service of process within the United States, which would make it difficult for investors to effect service of process in the United States on us or our directors and officers who reside outside the United States, or to recover against us or our directors and officers on judgments of U.S. courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our charter documents, consisting of our memorandum and articles of association, by the Companies Law (2013 Revision) of the Cayman Islands (as supplemented or amended from time to time) (the “Companies Law”) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors are governed by Cayman Islands law and are not as clearly established as under statutes or judicial precedent in jurisdictions such as the United States. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived, in part, from relatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding in the Cayman Islands. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. While there is some case law in the Cayman Islands on these matters, it is not as developed as, for example, in the United States. In addition, the laws of the Cayman Islands relating to the protection of the interests of minority shareholders differ in some respects from those established under statutes or judicial precedent in the United States. Such differences may mean that our minority shareholders may have less protection than they would have had under the laws of the United States. The less protective nature of such laws in the Cayman Islands may make it more difficult for our shareholders to protect their interests in the face of actions by our management or directors than shareholders of a corporation incorporated in other jurisdictions. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

We have been advised by our Cayman Islands legal counsel that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, and or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

As a result of all of the above, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as shareholders of a U.S. company.

If we are characterized as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our U.S. shareholders may suffer adverse tax consequences.

If 75% or more of our gross income in a taxable year, including our pro-rata share of the gross income of any company, U.S. or foreign, in which we are considered to own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the shares by value, is passive income, then we will be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Alternatively, we will be considered to be a PFIC if at least 50% of our assets in a taxable year, averaged over the year and ordinarily determined based on fair market value and including our pro-rata share of the assets of any company in which we are considered to own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the shares by value, are held for the production of, or produce, passive income. Once treated as a PFIC, for any taxable year, a foreign corporation will generally continue to be treated as PFIC for all subsequent taxable years. If we were to be a PFIC, and a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10E. Taxation-United States Federal Income Taxation”) does not make an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, or a “mark-to-market” election, “excess distributions” to a U.S. Holder, and any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on a disposition of our ordinary shares, would be taxed in an unfavorable way. Among other consequences, our dividends, to the extent that they constituted excess distributions, would be taxed at the regular rates applicable to ordinary income, rather than the 20% maximum rate applicable to certain dividends received by an individual from a qualified foreign corporation, and certain “interest” charges may apply. In addition, gains on the sale of our shares would be treated in the same way as excess distributions. The tests for determining PFIC status are applied annually and it is difficult to make accurate predictions of future income and assets, which are relevant to the determination of PFIC status. In addition, under the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, it is unclear whether we would be permitted to use a gross loss from sales (sales less cost of goods sold) to offset our passive income in the calculation of gross income. As a result of our substantial cash position, if the value of our operating business assets declines, there is a substantial risk that we will be classified as a PFIC under the asset test described above. There can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a PFIC by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Although we do not believe that we were a PFIC in 2015, in light of the periodic asset and income tests applicable in making this determination, no assurance can be given that we will not become a PFIC in any future year. A U.S. Holder who makes a QEF election is taxed currently on such holder’s proportionate share of our earnings. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) determines that we are a PFIC for a year with respect to which we have determined that we were not a PFIC, however, it might be too late for a U.S. Holder to make a timely QEF election, unless the U.S. Holder qualifies under the applicable Treasury regulations to make a retroactive (late) election. U.S. Holders who hold ordinary shares during a period when we are a PFIC will be subject to the foregoing rules, even if we cease to be a PFIC, subject to exceptions for U.S. Holders who made a timely QEF or mark-to-market election, or certain other elections. We do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a QEF election. Accordingly, our shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of PFIC rules.

Certain provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may make it difficult for shareholders to change the composition of our board of directors and may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that some shareholders may consider beneficial.

Certain provisions of our amended and restated articles of association may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control if our board of directors determines that such changes in control are not in the best interests of our company and our shareholders. The provisions in our amended and restated articles of association include, among other things, those that:

While these provisions have the effect of encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors, they could enable the board of directors to hinder or frustrate a transaction that some, or a majority, of the shareholders may believe to be in their best interests and, in that case, may prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our shareholders to replace or remove our current management members by making it more difficult for shareholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management.

We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, we are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and are subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reporting obligations that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those applicable to a U.S. issuer .

We report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as a foreign private issuer. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. public companies, including (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; (ii) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information, or current reports on Form 8-K, upon the occurrence of specified significant events. We intend to furnish quarterly reports to the SEC on Form 6-K for so long as we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(g) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, although the information we furnish may not be the same as the information that is required in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for U.S. domestic issuers. In addition, while U.S. domestic issuers that are not large accelerated filers or accelerated filers are required to file their Annual Reports on Form 10-K within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, foreign private issuers are not required to file their Annual Report on Form 20-F until 120 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from the Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers.

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of otherwise applicable NASDAQ requirements, which may result in less protection than under rules applicable to domestic U.S. issuers .

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required under the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market for domestic U.S. issuers. For instance, we have elected to follow home country practice in the Cayman Islands with regard to quorum requirements at general meetings of our shareholders. In addition, we intend to follow our home country law instead of the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market that require us to obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as the establishment or amendment of certain equity based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or greater interest in the company, and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. Following our home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a United States company listed on NASDAQ may provide less protection to you than what is accorded to investors under the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market applicable to domestic U.S. issuers.

Intellectual Property and Data/Systems Security

Our intellectual property may not be adequately protected.

We believe that many participants in the defense and security industries do not register patents or other intellectual property in the ordinary course of business. In order to safeguard our unpatented proprietary know-how, trade secrets and technology, we rely primarily upon trade secret protection and non-disclosure provisions in agreements with employees and other third parties having access to our confidential information. There can be no assurance that these measures will adequately protect us from improper disclosure or misappropriation of our proprietary information.

Preventing unauthorized use or infringement of our intellectual property rights is difficult even in jurisdictions with well-established legal protections for intellectual property such as the United States. It may be even more difficult to protect our intellectual property in other jurisdictions where legal protections for intellectual property rights are less established. If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property against unauthorized third party use or infringement, our competitive position could be adversely affected.

Our products may infringe or may be alleged to infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, which could lead to costly disputes or disruptions for us and may require us to indemnify our customers and resellers for any damages they suffer.

The technology industry is characterized by frequent allegations of intellectual property infringement. Any allegation of infringement against us could be time consuming and expensive to defend or resolve, result in substantial diversion of management resources, cause product shipment delays or force us to enter into royalty or license agreements. If patent holders or other holders of intellectual property initiate legal proceedings against us, either with respect to our own intellectual property or intellectual property we license from third parties, we may be forced into protracted and costly litigation, regardless of the merits of these claims. On November 12, 2015, a lawsuit was submitted to the Lod District Court in Israel by a company and an individual against Ability and its shareholders. The lawsuit amount for registration fee purposes is NIS 5 million (approximately $1.3 million), however the plaintiffs did not specify the demanded compensation amount. The plaintiffs allege that certain of Ability’s GSM interception and decryption systems apparently fall within the claim of an Israeli patent owned by the plaintiffs. Furthermore, the plaintiffs demand that Ability and/or its shareholders immediately cease any patent infringement as well as cease from any further use of the claimed technology, including the further manufacture, export, sale or marketing of the alleged infringing products. We believe the allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against them. See “Item 8A. Financial Information — Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information — Legal Proceedings.” We may not be successful in defending such litigation, including the pending litigation, in part due to the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation, and may not be able to procure any required royalty or license agreements on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Third parties may also assert infringement claims against our customers. Subject to certain limitations, we sometimes indemnify our customers and resellers with respect to infringement by our products of the proprietary rights of third parties, which, in some cases, may not be limited to a specified maximum amount and for which we may not have sufficient insurance coverage or adequate indemnification in the case of intellectual property licensed from a third party. If any of these claims succeed, we may be forced to pay damages, be subject to injunction with respect to the use or sale of certain products, be required to obtain licenses for the products our customers or partners use, which may not be available on reasonable terms, or incur significant expenses in developing non-infringing alternatives.

We face risks relating to our use of certain “open source” software tools.

Certain of our software products contain a limited amount of open source code and we may use more open source code in the future. In addition, certain third party software that we embed in our products contains open source code. Open source code is code that is covered by a license agreement that permits the user to liberally use, copy, modify and distribute the software without cost, provided that users and modifiers abide by certain licensing requirements. The original developers of the open source code provide no warranties on such code.

As a result of our use of open source software, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source code and we may incur expenses in defending claims that we did not abide by the open source code license. In addition, third party licensors do not provide intellectual property protection with respect to the open source components of their products, and therefore we may not be indemnified by such third party licensors in the event that we or our customers are held liable in respect of the open source software contained in such third party software. If we are not successful in defending against any such claims that may arise, we may be subject to injunctions and/or monetary damages or be required to remove the open source code from our products. Such events could disrupt our operations and the sales of our products, which would negatively impact our revenues and cash flow.

Moreover, under certain conditions, the use of open source code to create derivative code may obligate us to make the resulting derivative code available to others at no cost. The circumstances under which our use of open source code would compel us to offer derivative code at no cost are subject to varying interpretations. If we are required to publicly disclose the source code for such derivative products or to license our derivative products that use an open source license, our previously proprietary software products may be available to others without charge. If this happens, our customers and our competitors may have access to our products without cost to them, which could harm our business.

We monitor our use of such open source code to avoid subjecting our products to conditions we do not intend. The use of such open source code, however, may ultimately subject some of our products to unintended conditions so that we are required to take remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts.

We may be subject to information technology system failures or disruptions that could harm our operations, financial condition or reputation.

We rely extensively on information technology systems to operate and manage our business and to process, maintain and safeguard information, including information belonging to our customers, partners, and personnel.

These systems may be subject to failures or disruptions as a result of, among other things, natural disasters, accidents, power disruptions, telecommunications failures, new system implementations, acts of terrorism or war, physical security breaches, computer viruses, or other cyber-attacks. Cyber-attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and in many cases may not be identified until a security breach actually occurs. We have experienced cyber-attacks in the past and may experience them in the future, potentially with greater frequency. While we are continually working to maintain secure and reliable systems, our security, redundancy, and business continuity efforts may be ineffective or inadequate. We must continuously improve our design and coordination of security controls across our business groups and geographies. Despite our efforts, it is possible that our security controls and other procedures that we follow may not prevent systems failures or disruptions. Such system failures or disruptions could subject us to research and development or production downtimes, delays in our ability to process orders, delays in our ability to provide products and services to customers, delays or errors in financial reporting, compromise, disclosure, or loss of sensitive or confidential information or intellectual property, destruction or corruption of data, financial losses from remedial actions, theft, liabilities to customers or other third parties, or damage to our reputation. Information system failures at one of our partners may also result in similar adverse consequences.

Any of the foregoing could harm our competitive position, result in a loss of customer confidence and materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Risks Related to our Company

Our internal control over financial reporting do not currently meet all of the standards contemplated by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have identified the need to improve our information and internal control systems and intend to begin the process of implementing our internal control procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. See the risk factor “ Material weaknesses were noted in our financial reporting closing process with respect to cut-off procedures relating to expenses and revenue recognition in multiple element transactions, which resulted in a restatement to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and for the two years in the period then ended and as of June 30 and September 30 in 2015 and 2014 and for the six and nine month periods then ended, respectively, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over such procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business .” We intend to establish formal policies, processes and practices related to financial reporting, identify key financial reporting risks and assess the potential impact of those risks to specific areas and activities within our organization that may need remediation. We have engaged an external consultant to assist us with the improvement of our information and control systems and to assist in our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We also intend to enhance the formality and rigor of review and reconciliation of amounts due to major vendors.

Prior to the Business Combination, Ability was a privately held company and therefore its controls were not required to be designed or maintained in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. The design of public company internal control over financial reporting following the Business Combination will require significant time and resources from our management and other personnel. As a result, management was unable, without incurring unreasonable effort or expense, to conduct an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. Therefore, we are excluding from this Annual Report management’s report on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 pursuant to Section 215.02 of the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations of Regulation S-K.

If we are not able to implement and document the necessary policies, processes and controls to mitigate financial reporting risks, we may not be able to comply with the requirements of Sections 404(a) and (b) in a timely manner or with adequate compliance. Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis and thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions by the SEC or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in our company and in the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence in the reliability of our financial statements could also suffer if we were to report a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This could materially adversely affect our business and lead to a decline in the price of our shares.

Material weaknesses were noted in our financial reporting closing process with respect to cut-off procedures relating to expenses and revenue recognition in multiple element transactions, which resulted in a restatement to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and for the two years in the period then ended and as of June 30 and September 30 in 2015 and 2014 and for the six and nine month periods then ended, respectively, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over such procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business.  

As part of our financial reporting closing process, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were identified with respect to cut-off procedures relating to expenses, as certain amounts due to two third parties had not been timely expensed, and revenue recognition in multiple element sale transactions had not been properly allocated and timely deferred, which resulted in a restatement of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and for the two years in the period then ended and as of June 30 and September 30 in 2015 and 2014 and for the six and nine month periods then ended, respectively. For additional information, see Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Further, it was discovered that certain amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2015, which could be deemed a violation of Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The outstanding balance has been repaid in full by the Ability shareholders. Further, in 2015, Ability was a victim of fraud committed by an outside, unrelated third party resulting in an unauthorized outgoing transfer of $0.5 million. We intend to address our internal control over financial reporting issues in order to remedy these material weaknesses. See “ Our internal control over financial reporting do not currently meet all of the standards contemplated by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business.”

A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting entails that our controls do not ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in our company and in the reliability of our financial statements. This could materially adversely affect our business and lead to a decline in the price of our shares.

The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile.

The price of our ordinary shares may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including:

These market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our ordinary shares, regardless of our operating performance.

Our international operations subject us to currency exchange risk.

We earn revenues, pay expenses, own assets and incur liabilities in countries using currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including (among others) the NIS and Euro. Because our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, we must translate revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. dollar functional currencies into U.S. dollars using currency exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. Therefore, changes in currency exchange rates affect our consolidated operating income. In addition, our net income is further impacted by the revaluation and settlement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, gains or losses on which are recorded within income (expense), net.

Our financial outlook does not assume fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Adverse fluctuations in currency exchange rates subsequent to providing our financial outlook could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our outlook, which could negatively affect our business.

Our income tax rate is complex and subject to uncertainty.

Computations of our taxes on income and withholding obligations are complex because they are based on the laws of numerous tax jurisdictions. These computations require significant judgment on the application of complicated rules governing accounting for tax provisions under GAAP. The international nature of our structure and operations creates uncertainties. Taxes on income for interim periods are based on a forecast of Ability’s reduced tax rate of 16% with respect to income generated by its Preferred Enterprise, which includes forward looking financial projections. Such financial projections are based on numerous assumptions, including the expectations of profit and loss. We may not accurately forecast the various items that comprise the projections.

From time to time, we may be subject to income and other tax audits (including in Israel), the timing of which are unpredictable. While we believe we comply with applicable tax laws, there can be no assurance that a governing tax authority will not have a different interpretation of the law and assess us with additional taxes. Any additional taxes could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In recent years, we have seen changes in tax laws resulting in an increase in applicable tax rates, in part stemming from public pressure to increase tax liabilities of corporations and to limit the ability to gain from strategic tax planning, with a focus on international corporations. Such legislative changes in one or more jurisdictions in which we operate may have implications on our tax liability and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In 2014 and 2015, the Israeli corporate tax rate increased until its reduction in 2016 and thereafter. Furthermore, the Israeli government may determine to reduce, phase out or eliminate entirely tax benefits currently available under certain government programs. If corporate tax rates increase or the tax benefits under such government programs were to be reduced or eliminated, our effective tax rate may increase, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our shareholder composition may make it difficult for shareholders to significantly influence the decisions of the general meeting.

As of completion of the Business Combination, more than 63% of our ordinary shares are held by the Ability shareholders, i.e., Anatoly Hurgin, our Chief Executive Officer, and Alexander Aurovsky, our Chief Technology Officer. Consequently, the Ability shareholders may have the ability, either acting alone or jointly, to significantly influence or determine the outcome of specific matters submitted to the general meeting for approval, including amendments to our articles of association and election of members to our board of directors, and may make it difficult for other shareholders to significantly influence the outcome of a general meeting.

The interests of our major shareholders may not always be aligned with those of our other shareholders. In addition, conflict of interests may exist or occur between our major shareholders. Any material conflicts of interests between our major shareholders and other stakeholders may have a material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Pursuant to the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for so long as we are an “emerging growth company.”

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and generally requires, in the same report, a report by our independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. However, under the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” We could be an “emerging growth company” for up to five years.

We incur significant costs and obligations as a result of being a public company.

As a publicly traded company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined under the JOBS Act. In addition, new and changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, as well as under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the JOBS Act, and the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market have created uncertainty for public companies and increased the costs and the time that our board of directors and management must devote to complying with these rules and regulations. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and lead to a diversion of management time and attention from revenue generating activities, which could prevent us from improving our business, results of operations and financial condition. We have made, and will continue to make, changes to our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and accounting systems to meet our reporting obligations as a publicly traded company. However, the measures we take may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations.

If we are unable to develop and implement adequate required accounting practices and policies, we may be unable to provide the financial information required of a U.S. publicly traded company in a timely and reliable manner.

As a U.S. publicly traded company, the implementation of all required accounting practices and policies and the hiring of additional financial staff will increase our operating costs and could require significant time and resources from our management and employees. If we are unable to develop and maintain effective internal controls and procedures and disclosure procedures and controls, we may be unable to provide financial information and required SEC reports that a U.S. publicly traded company is required to provide in a timely and reliable fashion. Any such delays or deficiencies could penalize us, including by limiting our ability to obtain financing, either in the public capital markets or from private sources and hurt our reputation and could thereby impede our ability to implement our growth strategy. In addition, any such delays or deficiencies could result in our failure to meet the requirements for continued listing of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

Reports published by analysts, including projections in those reports that differ from our actual results, could adversely affect the price and trading volume of our ordinary shares.

We currently expect that securities research analysts will establish and publish their own periodic projections for our business. These projections may vary widely and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our share price may decline if our actual results do not match the projections of these securities research analysts. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who write reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our share price or trading volume could decline. While we do expect research analyst coverage, if no analysts choose to cover us, the trading price and volume for our ordinary shares could be adversely affected.

We may issue additional ordinary shares or other equity securities without shareholder approval, which would dilute your ownership interests and may depress the market price of our ordinary shares.

We may issue additional ordinary shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank in the future in connection with, among other things, our equity incentive plan or future vessel acquisitions or repayment of outstanding indebtedness , without shareholder approval, in a number of circumstances.

Issuance of additional ordinary shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank would have the following effects:

We currently do not intend to declare or pay cash dividends in the near future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our securities.

We currently do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the near future. Our board of directors has discretion to declare and pay dividends on our ordinary shares and will make any determination to do so based on a number of factors, such as our operating results, financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs and other business and economic factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. In accordance with the laws of the Cayman Islands, no dividend or other distribution shall be paid except out of our realized or unrealized profits, out of the share premium account or as otherwise permitted by law. If we do not pay dividends, our ordinary shares may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if the trading price of our securities appreciates. You should not rely on an investment in us if you require dividend income from your investments.

We have granted certain veto rights with respect to a private placement of our securities which could prevent us from increasing capital when needed.

Pursuant to the Business Combination agreement, we granted each of Anatoly Hurgin, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and the former Chief Executive Officer and director of Ability, and Alexander Aurovsky, our Chief Technology Officer and a director and the former Chief Technology Officer and director of Ability, the right during the two year period following the closing of the Business Combination to veto a private placement of our ordinary shares (i) to any persons or entities which were holders of Cambridge stock on the closing date of the Business Combination, or (ii) that would result in a number of ordinary shares being issued equal to or in excess of 20% of our then outstanding ordinary shares (based on pre-money valuation), except if any such private placement is then allowable under the Israeli Tax Authority rulings. Each of Messrs. Hurgin and Aurovsky may exercise their veto right in their sole and absolute discretion and they will likely have interests that are different from our interests, which could result in their prohibiting us from completing a private placement that would be beneficial to us. If either of Messrs. Hurgin or Aurovsky were to prohibit us from completing a private placement at a time when we require funds, our cash flows and operations could be mutually adversely affected and we could be prohibited from completing an acquisition, repaying indebtedness, expanding our operations or taking other actions contemplated at such time.

Future resales of our ordinary shares issued to the Ability shareholders may cause the market price of Ability’s securities to drop significantly, even if Ability’s business is performing well.

Under the Business Combination agreement, the Ability shareholders received, among other things, an aggregate of: (i) 16,213,268 of our ordinary shares; (ii) $18,150,000 in cash; and (iii) an additional number of ordinary shares to be issued upon and subject to Ability achieving certain net income targets. The Ability shareholders have entered into lock-up agreements restricting them, subject to certain exceptions, from selling any of the shares that they received as a result of the Share Exchange for a period of 24 months from the closing of the Business Combination. See “Item 4A. Information on the Company - History and Development of the Company - Our History - Lock-Up Agreements.” The Ability shareholders’ ordinary shares are “restricted securities” as defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act and may only be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration, if available. The Ability shareholders may rely on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144, if available, in which case, resales must meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of the rule, including compliance with the applicable holding period, volume limitations and availability of current public information. Thus, following expiration of the applicable lock-up periods, and upon satisfaction of the requirements of Rule 144, the Ability shareholders may sell large amounts of our shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, which could have the effect of increasing volatility in our share price or putting significant downward pressure on the price of our shares.

There are no contractual lock-up restrictions on the (i) 480,000 of our ordinary shares issued to Eyal Tzur as a portion of the consideration for the sale of his shares in ASM and the additional up to 253,500 of our ordinary shares to be issued upon and subject to Ability achieving certain net income targets, and the (ii) 480,000 of our ordinary shares issued to Migdal Underwriting & Business Initiatives Ltd. as a portion of its fees in connection with the Business Combination and the additional up to 253,500 of our ordinary shares to be issued upon and subject to Ability achieving certain net income targets, and these shares are therefore freely saleable in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, which could have the effect of increasing volatility in our share price or putting significant downward pressure on the price of our shares.