NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

All currency is rounded to the nearest thousands except share and per share amounts

NOTE 1: NATURE OF OPERATIONS, LIQUIDITY

Unless the context otherwise indicates, references in these Notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements to “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” refer to Creative Realities, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  

Basis of Presentation

We have prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The accompanying year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from the audited financial statements included in the annual financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited, and reflect all adjustments that in the opinion of management are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. Unless otherwise noted, all such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and cash flows that it may achieve in future periods. Nevertheless, we believe that the disclosures are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s 10-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2017.

Nature of the Company’s Business

Creative Realities, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation that provides innovative digital marketing technology and solutions to retail companies, individual retail brands, enterprises and organizations throughout the United States and in certain international markets. We have expertise in a broad range of existing and emerging digital marketing technologies, as well as the related media management and distribution software platforms and networks, device management, product management, customized software service layers, systems, experiences, workflows, and integrated solutions. Our technology and solutions include: digital merchandising systems and omni-channel customer engagement systems, interactive digital shopping assistants, advisors and kiosks, and other interactive marketing technologies such as mobile, social media, point-of-sale transactions, beaconing and web-based media that enable our customers to transform how they engage with consumers. We have expertise in a broad range of existing and emerging digital marketing technologies, as well as the following related aspects of our business: content, network management, and connected device software and firmware platforms; customized software service layers; hardware platforms; digital media workflows; and proprietary processes and automation tools. We believe we are one of the world’s leading interactive marketing technology companies that focuses on the retail shopper experience by helping retailers and brands use the latest technologies to create better shopping experiences.

Our main operations are conducted directly through Creative Realities, Inc., and under our wholly owned subsidiaries Creative Realities, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Wireless Ronin Technologies Canada, Inc., and ConeXus World Global, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company.

Acquisitions

Acquisition of ConeXus World Global

On October 15, 2015, we completed the acquisition of ConeXus World Global, LLC pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization for 2,080,000 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, and the conversion of $823 of ConeXus World Global debt into (i) 2,639,258 shares of our common stock, and (ii) $150 in principal amount of our convertible debt. As a result of the merger transaction, ConeXus World Global, LLC is our wholly owned operating subsidiary. The merger was completed by the filing of articles of merger with the Kentucky Secretary of State . The debtholders and members of ConeXus received a total of 1,664,000 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $1.00, and 16,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01.

In accordance with the terms of the agreement and plan of merger and reorganization, an additional 416,000 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock and 4,000,000 shares of common stock were to be issued upon the reorganization of the capital structure of a Belgian affiliate of ConeXus.  Since the passage of the March 31, 2016 date targeted for the completion of the reorganization of the Belgian affiliate, the parties have determined that the value of the Belgian affiliate was de minimis. 

An agreement was reached on September 1, 2017 by Creative Realities, Inc. and the prior shareholders of ConeXus to recognize the value obtained by Creative Realities, Inc. as a result of the merger and to settle the Holdback Shares to the prior shareholders of ConeXus.  Creative Realities, Inc. has waived the contingency relating to the issuance of the Holdback Shares and issued to the shareholders 5,631,373 shares of common stock. 3,198,054 of these shares were issued to Rick Mills, a majority shareholder of ConeXus, a related party, and the CEO of Creative Realities, Inc. Since the measurement period for the business combination has expired, the issuance of the shares is recognized as a charge to operations during the period of $1.9 million.

Liquidity

We have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 we incurred net losses from operations of $(3,587) and $(2,344), respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 we incurred net losses from operations of $(4,486) and $(4,735) respectively. As of September 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4,585 and a working capital deficit of $(8,430). In November 2017, we received notification from Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party, of their intent to extend the maturity date of our term loan to August 17, 2019 and to extend the maturity date of our promissory notes on a rolling quarter addition basis which is now January 15, 2019. Management believes that due to the expected extension of these debt maturity dates, our current cash balance and our operational forecast and liquidity projection for 2017 and 2018, we can continue to meet our obligations and operate as a going concern through at least the next twelve months.

Note 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ACCOUNTING CHANGES

A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:

1.  Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Creative Realities, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiaries ConeXus World Global LLC, Creative Realities, LLC, and Wireless Ronin Technologies Canada, Inc. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation, as applicable.

2.  Foreign Currency

For the Company’s Canadian operations, the local currency has been determined to be the functional currency. The results of its non-U.S. dollar based operations are translated to U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates during the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the balance sheet date. Equity is translated at the prevailing rate of exchange at the date of the equity transaction. The effects of converting non-functional currency assets and liabilities into the functional currency are recorded as general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Translation adjustments, which are considered immaterial to date, have been recorded as general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

3.  Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue primarily from these sources:

We recognize revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 910, Contractors-Construction , ASC 605,  Revenue Recognition , ASC 605-25,  Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables and ASC subtopic 985-605,  Software . In the event of a multiple-element arrangement, we evaluate each element of the transaction to determine if it represents a separate unit of accounting, taking into account all factors following the guidelines set forth in FASB ASC 985-605-25-5:

We enter into arrangements with customers that could include a combination of software products, system hardware, maintenance and support, or installation and training services. We allocate the total arrangement fee among the various elements of the arrangement based on the relative fair value of each of the undelivered elements determined by vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE). In software arrangements for which we do not have VSOE of fair value for all elements, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when VSOE is determined for the undelivered elements (residual method) or when all elements for which we do not have VSOE of fair value have been delivered. We have determined the VSOE of fair value for each of the Company’s products and services.

The VSOE for maintenance and support services is based upon the renewal rate for continued service arrangements. The VSOE for installation and training services is established based upon pricing for the services. The VSOE for software and licenses is based on the normal pricing and discounting for the product when sold separately.

Each element of our multiple-element arrangements qualifies for separate accounting. Nevertheless, when a sale includes both software and maintenance, we defer revenue under the residual method of accounting. Under this method, the undelivered maintenance and support fees included in the price of software is amortized ratably over the period the services are provided.

System hardware sales

Included in “hardware” are system hardware sales whereby revenue is recognized generally upon shipment of the product or customer acceptance depending upon contractual arrangements with the customer. Shipping charges billed to customers are included in sales and the related shipping costs are included in cost of sales. Total hardware sales were $1,568 and $856 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $3,649 and $2,536 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Services and Other

Included in “services and other” revenue is professional and implementation services, software design and development services, software and software license sales and maintenance and support services revenue. Total services and other revenue was $2,007 and $1,852 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $9,913 and $5,636 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Professional and implementation services

Professional services revenue is derived primarily from consulting services related to the design and development of various marketing experiences, and content development and management. The majority of professional services and accompanying agreements qualify for separate accounting.

Implementation services revenue is derived from implementation, maintenance and support contracts, content development, software development and training.

These services are bid either on a fixed-fee basis, time-and-materials basis or both. For time-and-materials contracts, we recognize revenue as services are performed. For fixed-fee contracts, we recognize revenue upon completion of specific contractual milestones, or by using the percentage-of-completion method.

Software design and development services

Software design and development services includes revenue from contracts for technology integration consulting services where we design/redesign, build and implement new or enhanced systems applications and related processes for clients recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. The percentage-of-completion accounting involves calculating the percentage of services provided during the reporting period compared to the total estimated services to be provided over the duration of the contract. Estimated revenues from applying the percentage-of-completion method include estimated incentives for which achievement of defined goals is deemed probable. Contract costs include all direct material, labor, subcontractors, certain indirect costs, such as indirect labor, equipment costs, supplies, tools and depreciation costs. This method is followed where reasonably dependable estimates of revenues and costs can be made. We measure progress for completion based on either the hours worked as a percentage of the total number of hours of the project or by delivery and customer acceptance of specific milestones as outlined per the terms of the agreement with the customer. Estimates of total contract revenue and costs are continuously monitored during the term of the contract, and recorded revenue and costs are subject to revision as the contract progresses. Such revisions may result in increases or decreases to revenue and income and are reflected in the financial statements in the periods in which they are first identified. If estimates indicate that a contract loss will occur, a loss provision is recorded in the period in which the loss first becomes probable and reasonably estimable. Contract losses are determined to be the amount by which the estimated direct and indirect costs of the contract exceed the estimated total revenue that will be generated by the contract and are included in cost of sales and classified in accrued expenses in the balance sheet. Selling, general and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Our presentation of revenue recognized on a contract completion basis has been consistently applied for all periods presented.

Software as a service

Software as a service includes revenue from software licensing and delivery in which software is licensed on a subscription basis and is centrally hosted.

Software and software license sales

Software and software license sales are revenue when a fixed fee order has been received and delivery has occurred to the customer. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies based upon signed agreements received from the customer confirming terms of the transaction. Software is delivered to customers electronically or on a CD-ROM, and license files are delivered electronically.

Maintenance and support services

Maintenance and support services revenue consists of software updates and various forms of support services. Software updates provide customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades and maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period. Support includes access to technical support personnel for software and hardware issues. We also offer a hosting service through our network operations center, or NOC, allowing the ability to monitor and support its customers’ networks 7 days a week, 24 hours a day. This revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the contract, which is typically one to three years. Maintenance and support is renewable by the customer. Rates for maintenance and support, including subsequent renewal rates, are typically established based upon a fee per location, per device, or a specified percentage of net software license fees as set forth in the arrangement. Support agreement fees are based on the level of service provided to its customers, which can range from monitoring the health of a customer’s network to supporting a sophisticated web-portal to managing the end-to-end hardware and software of a digital marketing system.

Costs and estimated earnings recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts are recorded as unbilled services and are included in work-in-process on the balance sheet. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are recorded as deferred revenue until revenue recognition criteria are met. Unbilled receivables are a normal part of our business as some receivables are invoiced in the month following shipment or completion of services. Our policy is to present any taxes imposed on revenue-producing transactions on a net basis.

4.  Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of commercial paper and all other liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had substantially all cash invested in commercial banks. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250.

5. Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Our unsecured accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms, carried at their face value less an allowance for doubtful accounts. We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts based on the evaluation of the aging of our accounts receivable and on a customer-by-customer analysis of high-risk customers. Our reserves contemplate our historical loss rate on receivables, specific customer situations and the economic environments in which we operate. We determine past-due accounts receivable on a customer-by-customer basis. Accounts receivable are written off after all reasonable collection efforts have failed. The Company recognized a reserve for doubtful accounts of $40 and $85 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

6. Work-In-Process and Inventories

Our work-in-process and inventories are recorded using the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory is net of an allowance for obsolescence of $10 as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Inputs are broadly defined as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

FASB ASC 820-10,  Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of an entity's financial instruments. Such disclosures, which pertain to our financial instruments, do not purport to represent our aggregate net fair value. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The fair value of the loan payable approximates carrying value based on the interest rates in the agreement compared to current market interest rates. The fair value of the warrant liabilities is calculated using a Black-Scholes model, which approximates a binomial model due to probability factors used to determine the fair value. The calculation of this liability is based on Level 3 inputs. See Notes 3 and 11 for further discussion on the valuation of warrant liabilities.

8.  Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review the carrying value of all long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10-05-4, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets . Under ASC 360-10-05-4, impairment losses are recorded whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.

If the impairment tests indicate that the carrying value of the asset is greater than the expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such asset, an impairment loss would be recognized. The impairment loss is determined as the amount by which the carrying value of such asset exceeds its fair value. We generally measure fair value by considering sale prices for similar assets or by discounting estimated future cash flows from such assets using an appropriate discount rate. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of their carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of assets, and accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. No impairment was noted in 2017. In September 2016, the Company made comprehensive upgrades to its technology platform. Due to these upgrades, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying amount of the original technology platform intangible asset at September 30, 2016. Based upon this evaluation, the Company determined that the technology platform intangible asset was impaired as its value was not recoverable and exceeded its fair value. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $1,065 in 2016.

9. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over the estimated service lives, principally using straight-line methods. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the improvement or the lease term, using the straight-line method.

 Depreciation and amortization expense was $92 and $70 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and $256 and $205 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

10. Research and Development and Software Development Costs

Research and development expenses consist primarily of development personnel and non-employee contractor costs related to the development of new products and services, enhancement of existing products and services, quality assurance and testing. Effective April 2015, the Company began capitalizing its costs for additional functionality to its internal software. The Company capitalized approximately $116 and $88 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and $396 and $164 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These software development costs include both enhancements and upgrades of our client based systems including functionality of our internal information systems to aid in our productivity, profitability and customer relationship management. The Company amortizes these costs over 5 years once the new projects are finished and placed in service. These costs are included in property and equipment, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

11. Basic and Diluted Income/(Loss) per Common Share

Basic income/(loss) per common share for all periods presented is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Basic weighted average shares outstanding includes only outstanding common shares. Diluted weighted average shares outstanding includes outstanding common shares and potential dilutive common shares outstanding in accordance with the treasury stock method. Shares reserved for outstanding stock options and warrants totaling approximately 39.4 and 34.7 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were excluded from the computation of income/(loss) per share as their effect was antidilutive. Additionally, the potential common shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred stock and convertible promissory notes of 27.0 and 45.4 million were excluded at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive. Net income/(loss) attributable to common shareholders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 is after dividends on convertible preferred stock of $107 and $334, respectively.  Net income/(loss) attributable to common shareholders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 is after dividends on convertible preferred stock of $114 and $339, respectively. 

12. Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized in the financial statements for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. Temporary differences arise from net operating losses, differences in basis of intangibles (other than goodwill), stock-based compensation, reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable and inventory, differences in depreciation methods, and accrued expenses. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The calculation of our income tax provision involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations.  We recognize tax liabilities for uncertain income tax positions based on management’s estimate of whether it is more likely than not that additional taxes will be required.  We had no uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

13. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718-10, Stock Compensation , that permits the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payments including warrants, stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses based on estimated fair value. For purposes of determining estimated fair value under ASC 718-10-30, the Company computes the estimated fair values of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  Stock-based compensation expense for employees of $71 and $69 was charged to expense during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $213 and $204 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. 

14. Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets

We follow the provisions of ASC 350,  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . Pursuant to ASC 350, goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. The Company uses a measurement date of September 30. There was no impairment loss recognized on goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (see Note 5).

15. Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Our significant estimates include: the allowance for doubtful accounts, recognition of revenue, deferred tax assets, deferred revenue, depreciable lives and depreciation methods for property and equipment, valuation of warrants and other stock-based compensation and other assumptions and estimates used to evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets and the related amortization methods and periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

16. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Part I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments With Down Round Features, Part II Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception . This update provides guidance that changes the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments with down-round features. These instruments are no longer accounted for as derivative liabilities at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The guidance in this Update is effective for fiscal years, and interim period within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with earlier adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period, with any adjustments reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company early adopted this ASU in 2017 and has applied the guidance in this ASU retrospectively to all prior periods. As a result of adopting this ASU, the Company no longer recognizes a liability related to 16,482,635 warrants, which were only classified as liabilities as a result of having down round features. The debt discount for those warrants has been recalculated to reflect the relative fair value of the warrants and the debt. In addition, the Company determined that the impact to the income/(loss) per share as a result of the down round features was not material. The impact to the financial statements as of the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2016 and the balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:

*****

*****

*****

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017- 09 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting . This update provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting for Stock Compensation. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 , Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment . This update requires an entity to perform a two-step test to determine the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment. In Step 1, an entity compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the entity performs Step 2 and compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill for that reporting unit. An impairment charge equal to the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill for the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill is recorded, limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. To address concerns over the cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, the amendments in this ASU removes the second step of the test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any that the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01. Business Combinations , guidance clarifying the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The guidance provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business, provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and substantive process are present, and narrows the definition of the term output. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The guidance must be adopted on a prospective basis.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , which provides guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows, including those related to debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance, and distributions received from equity method investees. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including the adoption in an interim period. If an entity adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The guidance must be adopted on a retrospective basis and must be applied to all periods presented, but may be applied prospectively if retrospective application would be impracticable. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments , which provides guidance with respect to measuring credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables. This guidance eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold that was previously required prior to recognizing a credit loss on financial instruments. The credit loss estimate can now reflect an entity’s current estimate of all future expected credit losses. Under the previous guidance, an entity only considered past events and current conditions. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any that the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases , which amended guidance for lease arrangements in order to increase transparency and comparability by providing additional information to users of financial statements regarding an entity's leasing activities. The revised guidance seeks to achieve this objective by requiring reporting entities to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for substantially all lease arrangements. The guidance, which is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2019, will be applied on a modified retrospective basis beginning with the earliest period presented. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, which further clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations”, and in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from contracts with customers (Topic 606): Identifying performance obligations and licensing, an update on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property. Additionally, in May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from contracts with customers (Topic 606): Narrow-scope improvements and practical expedients, which includes amendments for enhanced clarification of the guidance. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. We are currently behind our schedule in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard update. The ultimate impact on revenue resulting from the application of the new standard will be subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including, but not limited to, the terms of our contractual arrangements. Upon adoption at January 1, 2018, we expect that the allocation of revenue between hardware, services and other will have insignificant changes as compared with current GAAP. However, for certain sales transactions, we expect the timing of revenue recognition for hardware and certain services sales may occur earlier, with the remaining service and other sales, occurring later than under current GAAP. We also expect the recognition of our sales commission expenses will be impacted, as a substantial portion of these costs (which are currently expensed) may be capitalized and amortized.

NOTE 3: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

We measure certain financial assets, including cash equivalents, at fair value on a recurring basis. In accordance with FASB ASC 820-10-30, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820-10-35 establishes a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and involve management judgment and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participants and pricing.

The following table presents information about the Company's warrant liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company used to determine such fair value. See Note 11 for the inputs used for the probability weighted Black Scholes valuations when the warrants were issued and at September 30, 2017.

NOTE 4: OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION

The following table provides details of selected financial statement items: 

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, amortization of intangible assets charged to operations was $282 and $470, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 amortization of intangible assets charged to operations was $928 and $1,409, respectively.

The Company has made comprehensive upgrades to its technology platform. Due to these upgrades, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying amount of the original technology platform intangible asset at September 30, 2016. Based upon this evaluation, the Company determined that the technology platform intangible asset was impaired as its value was not recoverable and exceeded its fair value. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $1,065 in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is subject to an impairment review at a reporting unit level, on an annual basis as of the end of September of each fiscal year, or when an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate potential impairment. The Company has only one reporting unit, and therefore the entire goodwill is allocated to that reporting unit.

The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, the Company determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test at September 30, 2017.

Utilizing the two-step impairment test, the Company first assessed the carrying value of goodwill at the reporting unit level based on an estimate of the fair value of the respective reporting unit. Fair value of the reporting unit was estimated using a discounted cash flow analyses consisting of various assumptions, including expectations of future cash flows based on projections or forecasts derived from analysis of business prospects and economic or market trends that may occur, specifically, the Company gave significant consideration for purchase orders expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2017 and orders actively being negotiated for fiscal 2018. We also used these same expectations in a number of valuation models in addition to discounted cash flows, including, leveraged buy-out, trading comps and market capitalization, and ultimately determined an estimated fair value of our reporting unit based on weighted average calculations from these models. Based on the Company's assessment, we determined that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, and accordingly, the goodwill associated with the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired at September 30, 2017.

The Company recognizes that any changes in our actual fourth quarter 2017 or projected 2018 results could potentially have a material impact on our assessment of goodwill impairment. The Company will continue to monitor the actual performance of its operations against expectations and assess indicators of possible impairment. The valuation of goodwill and intangible assets is subject to a high degree of judgment, uncertainty and complexity. Should any indicators of impairment occur in subsequent periods, the Company will be required to perform an analysis in order to determine whether goodwill is impaired.

NOTE 6: LOANS PAYABLE

In November 2017, we received notification from Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party, of their intent to extend the maturity date of our term loan to August 17, 2019 and to extend the maturity date of our promissory notes on a rolling quarter addition basis which is now January 15, 2019. In connection with the extension of the term loan, we agreed to issue to Slipstream Communications a five-year warrant to purchase up to 5,882,352 shares of common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants is expected to be approximately $1.0 million.

Term Notes

On December 12, 2016, we entered into a $1.0 million secured revolving promissory note pursuant to the August 17, 2016 Loan and Security Agreement with Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party, addressed below (see Note 9), wherein we borrowed $786 with interest thereon at 8% per annum, maturing on February 1, 2017. In connection with the loan, we issued the lender a five-year warrant to purchase up to 1,542,452 shares of common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment), all pursuant to a securities purchase agreement. In connection with the secured revolving promissory note, we incurred fees aggregating $37. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $136, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $60. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements. This note was repaid on January 12, 2017.

On August 17, 2016, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party (see Note 9), under which we obtained a $3.0 million term loan, with interest thereon at 8% per annum, maturing on August 17, 2017 (with a one-year option for us to extend that maturity, so long as we are not then in default and we deliver additional warrants to the lender). The term loan contains certain customary restrictions including, but not limited to, restrictions on mergers and consolidations with other entities, cancellation of any debt or incurring new debt (subject to certain exceptions), and other customary restrictions. In connection with the new debt, we issued the lender a five-year warrant to purchase up to 5,882,352 shares of common stock shares of Creative Realities’ common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment), all pursuant to a securities purchase agreement. The proceeds from the loan were used to (i) satisfy the obligations owed to Allied Affiliated Lending, L.P. under a Factoring Agreement, (ii) pay off certain obligations under settlement arrangements in effect as of the date hereof (see Note 7), and (iii) obtain working capital. The Loan and Security Agreement permits the lender to make additional advances of up to an additional $1.0 million. In connection with this financing transaction, we terminated the Factoring Agreement with Allied Affiliated Lending. Our principal subsidiaries — Creative Realities, Inc., Creative Realities, LLC, and Conexus World Global, LLC — were also parties to the securities purchase agreement and are co-makers of the secured convertible promissory notes. In connection with the term loan, we incurred fees aggregating $20. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $361, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $230. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements. On August 10, 2017, Slipstream extended the maturity date of this term loan to August 17, 2018. In exchange for the extension of the maturity date of the 8% senior notes, the Company provided 5,882,352 five-year warrants to purchase Company common shares. The fair value of the warrants for the extension of the debt on the issuance date was $1,241. The warrants are accounted for as equity warrants and related debt discount which will be amortized over the life of the debt. The change in the maturity date of the debt is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring. A new effective interest rate of 10.1% was established based on the net carrying value of the debt and the revised cash flows. There was no gain or loss recognized on this restructuring.

See Note 11 for the Black Scholes inputs used to calculate the fair value of the warrants.

Convertible Promissory Notes

The convertible promissory notes were issued in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. Our principal subsidiaries — Creative Realities, LLC, Wireless Ronin Technologies Canada, Inc., and Conexus World Global, LLC — were also parties to the Securities Purchase Agreement and are co-makers of the secured convertible promissory notes. In December 2016 and January 2017, Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party, purchased all our outstanding convertible promissory notes from the original debtholders. The terms of the notes have remained the same as addressed below.

Obligations under the secured convertible promissory notes are secured by a grant of collateral security in all the personal property of the co-makers pursuant to the terms of a security agreement. The secured convertible promissory notes bear interest at the rate of 14% per annum. Of this amount, 12% per annum is payable monthly in cash, and the remaining 2% per annum is payable in the form an additional principal through increases in the principal amount of the note. Upon the consummation of a change in control transaction of the Company or a default, interest on the secured convertible promissory note will increase to the rate of 17% per annum. The secured convertible promissory notes mature on October 15, 2018, as addressed below. The secured convertible promissory note contains other customary terms. See Note 11 for the Black Scholes inputs used to calculate the fair value of the warrants. On August 10, 2017, Slipstream extended the maturity date of all the promissory notes to October 15, 2018. The change was accounted for as a modification of the debt.

Further discussion on the notes are as follows.

On June 29, 2016, we entered into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $50 and an immediately exercisable five-year warrant to purchase up to 89,286 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $6, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $4. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements.

On June 13, 2016, upon receipt of an additional $300 of principal, we exchanged two short term demand notes entered into in July 2015 totaling $150 for two secured convertible promissory notes totaling a principal amount of $450 and immediately exercisable five-year warrants to purchase up to 803,572 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). This exchange was accounted for as a modification of the debt. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $57, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $40. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements.

On or about May 3, 2016, we entered into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $500,000 and an immediately exercisable five-year warrant to purchase up to 892,857 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). In connection with the secured convertible promissory note, we incurred commissions to a placement agent aggregating $25. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $89, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $60. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements.

On December 28, 2015, we entered into secured convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,250 and an immediately exercisable five-year warrant to purchase up to 2,232,143 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). In connection with the secured convertible promissory note, we incurred commissions to a placement agent aggregating $88. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $166. This was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $118. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements.

On October 26, 2015, we entered into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $300 together with an immediately exercisable five-year warrant to purchase up to 535,714 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.28, (subject to adjustment). In connection with the secured convertible promissory note, we paid commissions to a placement agent aggregating $15. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $61, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $43. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements.

On October 15, 2015, the Company entered into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $500 together with an immediately exercisable five-year warrant to purchase up to 892,857 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.28, (subject to adjustment). In connection with the secured convertible promissory note, we paid commissions to a placement agent aggregating $25. The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $107, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $75. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements.

On June 23, 2015, the Company entered into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $400 together with an immediately exercisable five-year warrant to purchase up to 640,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.30 (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $78. In connection with the October 26, 2015 secured convertible promissory note, we entered into extension agreements with the holders of this secured convertible promissory to primarily extend the maturity date to April 15, 2017 in exchange for 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $16.5. This change was accounted for as a modification of the debt. The $16.5 is recognized as additional debt discount that will be amortized over the remaining life of the debt.

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $465 together with a five-year immediately exercisable warrant to purchase up to 762,295 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share price of $0.30, (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $167, this was subsequently revised pursuant to ASU 2017-11 to be $104. See Note 2 for details on the effect this ASU had on the Company’s financial statements. This secured convertible promissory note together with accrued but unpaid interest and a 25% conversion premium was converted into a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $585 maturing on August 18, 2016, together with new immediately exercisable five-year warrants to purchase up to 935,210 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.30 per share, (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $114. In connection with the October 26, 2015 secured convertible promissory note, we entered into extension agreements with the holders of this secured convertible promissory to primarily extend the maturity date to April 15, 2017 in exchange for 109,688 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $24. This change is accounted for as a modification of the debt. The $24 is recognized as additional debt discount that will be amortized over the remaining life of the debt.

NOTE 7: STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROGRAM

In March 2017, the Company settled and/or wrote off debt of $1,109 for $243 cash payment and recognized a gain of $866. This debt included $693 of payables previously recorded by our dissolved subsidiary Broadcast International, Inc, as we had exhausted all efforts to identify and settle these obligations in the first quarter of 2017.

In August 2016, the Company settled debt of $90 for $35 cash payment, resulting in a gain on debt settlement of $55. In June 2016, the Company settled debt of $614 for $123 cash payment and the issuance of 409,347 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock, fair value at conversion date of $85, and recognized a gain on debt restructuring of $406. In conjunction with this debt settlement, an additional 809,842 shares of restricted common stock were issued to investors for cash to facilitate the settlement of a portion of the $614 debt. In March 2016, the Company issued 8.00% nonconvertible promissory notes in favor of certain general unsecured creditors in the aggregate principal amount of $288 to settle an aggregate amount of $839 of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities. The aggregate amount of payables, accrued expenses and other liabilities was subsequently revised to $796. In September 2016, the amounts previously settled with nonconvertible promissory notes were paid in cash of $249 resulting in a gain on the debt settlement of $547. No gain was previously recorded.

NOTE 8: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On August 10, 2017, the Company announced that it was closing its New Jersey and Minnesota locations. The Company has accrued one-time termination benefits related to severance to the affected employees of $175 and will recognize the expense over the period the employees are expected to continue service to the Company.

NOTE 9: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As discussed in Note 1, on September 1, 2017, our CEO received 3,198,054 shares of our common stock valued at $1,119, as part of the issuance of the ConeXus Holdback shares.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, 5,422,604 of the 8,806,906 shares of common stock issued upon conversion of preferred stock was to the Company’s CEO.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company had sales with a related party entity that is 22.5% owned by a member of senior management. Sales were $1,148 and $2,625 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. There were no related party sales during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Accounts receivable due from the related party was $2,871 and $543 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

On August 10, 2017, Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party investor, extended the maturity date of the term loan for which we issued to Slipstream Communications a five-year warrant to purchase up to 5,882,352 shares of common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $1.2 million.

In December 2016 and January 2017, the Company’s majority shareholder and investor, Slipstream Communications LLC acquired all of the Company’s outstanding debt (see Note 6).

On December 12, 2016, we entered into a $1.0 million secured revolving promissory note pursuant to the August 17, 2016 Loan and Security Agreement with Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party investor, with interest thereon at 8% per annum, maturing on February 1, 2017. In connection with the loan, we issued the lender a five-year warrant to purchase up to 1,542,452 shares of common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment), all pursuant to a securities purchase agreement. This note was repaid on January 12, 2017.

On August 17, 2016, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Slipstream Communications, LLC, a related party investor, under which we obtained a $3.0 million term loan, with interest thereon at 8% per annum, maturing on August 17, 2018 (see Note 6). In connection with the loan, we issued the lender a five-year warrant to purchase up to 5,882,352 shares of Creative Realities’ common stock at a per share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment).

NOTE 10: INCOME TAXES

Our deferred tax assets are primarily related to net federal and state operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We have substantial NOLs that are limited in its usage by IRC Section 382. IRC Section 382 generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of NOLs that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership within a statutory testing period. We have performed a preliminary analysis of the annual NOL carryforwards and limitations that are available to be used against taxable income. Based on the history of losses of the Company, there continues to be a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets of the Company.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we reported tax expense of $77 and $229, including $63 and $189, respectively, resulting from the goodwill on the acquisition of Wireless Ronin Technologies. The net deferred liability at September 30, 2017 of $798 represents the liability relating to indefinite lived assets, which is not more likely than not to be offset by the Company’s deferred tax assets.

NOTE 11: CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANTS

In connection with the extension of the term loan on August 10, 2017, we issued to Slipstream Communications a five-year warrant to purchase up to 5,882,352 shares of common stock at a per-share price of $0.28 (subject to adjustment). The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was $1.2 million.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the four holders of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (substantially similar in terms to the Company’s Convertible Preferred Stock, and issued to the shareholders of Conexus World Global LLC) converted all 1,860,561 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock into 7,296,318 shares of common stock. Additionally, certain accredited investors converted 132,200 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for 518,431 shares of common stock. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, accredited investors converted 12,750 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock for 50,000 shares of common stock. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, accredited investors converted 240,250 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock for 942,157 shares of common stock. During the three months ended December 31, September 30, and March 31, 2016, accredited investors converted 132,000, 75,500, and 100,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock for 517,647, 296,078 and 392,157 shares of common stock, respectively.

Listed below are the range of inputs used for the Black Scholes option pricing model valuations when the warrants were issued and at September 30, 2017.

A summary of outstanding liability and equity warrants is included below:

NOTE 12: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On September 1, 2017, the Company issued to the prior shareholders of ConeXus 5,631,373 shares of common stock valued at $0.35 per share for a total of $1,971 to settle the contingency of the Company in the ConeXus merger.

On August 9, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 5 million shares of our outstanding common stock through August 9, 2019. The authorization allows for the repurchases to be conducted through open market or privately negotiated transactions. Shares acquired under the stock repurchase program are expected to be retired and returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock. The stock repurchase program can be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time at our discretion.  No shares have been acquired through September 30, 2017.

In May 2017, the Company paid a vendor for services at a value of $500 with the issuance of 1,960,784 shares of common stock.

A summary of outstanding options is included below:

The weighted average remaining contractual life for options exercisable is 7.8 years as of September 30, 2017.

NOTE 13: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Compensation Expense Information

ASC 718-10, Stock Compensation , requires measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payments including warrants, stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses based on estimated fair values. Under the Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company reserved 1,720,000 shares for purchase by the Company’s employees and under the Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan the Company reserved 700,000 shares for purchase by the Company’s employees. There are 365,500 options outstanding under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. In October 2014, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, under which 7,390,355 shares were reserved for purchase by the Company’s employees. There are 7,124,999 options outstanding under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.

Compensation expense recognized for the issuance of stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

At September 30, 2017, there was approximately $625 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards. Generally, this expense will be recognized over the next 1.8 years and will be adjusted for any future changes in estimated forfeitures. 

Stock-based compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Currently, we estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company applied a pre-vesting forfeiture rate of 10% based on upon actual historical experience for employee option awards of the registrant.

On October 15, 2015, our current CEO was awarded 4,951,557 performance shares with a grant date to be determined upon certain conditions being satisfied.

NOTE 14: SEGMENT INFORMATION AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

Segment Information

We currently operate in one reportable segment, marketing technology solutions. Substantially all property and equipment is located at our offices in the United States. All sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were in the United States and Canada.

Major Customers

We had 1 and 2 customers that in the aggregate accounted for 62% and 71% of accounts receivable as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. One of these customers for both periods was a related party. See also Note 9 for discussion of related party major customer.

The Company had 2 and 3 customers that accounted for 46% and 64% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. One of these customers for both periods was a related party. The Company had 2 and 4 customers that accounted for 53% and 57% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. One of these customers for both periods was a related party.