RISK FACTORS

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should carefully consider the risks described below and other information contained in this prospectus, including our financial statements and related notes, before purchasing our securities. There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, or results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and investors in our Common Stock could lose all or part of their investment.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

We have only a limited history upon which an evaluation of our prospects and future performance can be made, and have no history of profitable operations. Since we have a limited operating history, it may be difficult to predict our future operating results.

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on December 7, 2015, and as a result, we have only a limited history upon which an evaluation of our prospects and future performance can be made, and have no history of profitable operations on a consolidated basis. Due to our lack of operating history, our proposed operations are subject to all business risks associated with new enterprises. The likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with the startup of a business, and operation in a competitive and regulated industry. We may sustain losses in the future as we implement our business plan. There can be no assurance that we will ever generate revenues to operate profitably. Investors should evaluate an investment in us in light of the uncertainties encountered by developing companies in a competitive environment. Our business is dependent upon the implementation of our business plan. We may not be successful in implementing such plan, and cannot guarantee that, if implemented, we will ultimately be able to attain profitability.

We may need to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

We may need additional capital in the future to continue to execute our business plan. In that case, we would be dependent upon additional capital in the form of either debt or equity to continue our operations and commercialize our products. We may not be able to arrange enough investment within the time the investment is required, or, if it is arranged, that it will be on favorable terms. If we cannot obtain the needed capital, we may not be able to become profitable, and may have to curtail or cease our operations.

We have a history of losses, and we anticipate that we will continue to incur losses in the future. Our auditors have included in their audit report an explanatory paragraph as to substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have experienced net losses since our inception. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our net loss was $2,177,641, compared to a net loss of $802,463 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, our net loss was $949,669 and $1,679,058, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $3,743,438. As of March 31, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $4,693,107. Our auditors have included in their audit report a “going concern” explanatory paragraph that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, which assumes the realization of our assets and the satisfaction of our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. We anticipate continuing to incur substantial additional losses over at least the next several years due to, among other factors, expenses related to the following: anticipated research and development activities, investor and public relations, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) compliance efforts, and the general and administrative expenses associated with each of these activities. We may never achieve profitability, and, even if we do, we may not be able to sustain being profitable.

Restrictions contained in our debt agreements may limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness.

Our existing debt facilities contain restrictive covenants, including restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness. These restrictions could limit our ability to effectuate future acquisitions, limit our ability to pay dividends, limit our ability to make capital expenditures, or restrict our financial flexibility. Our ability to meet the financial covenants or requirements in our debt facilities may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to satisfy such covenants and requirements. A breach of these covenants or other restrictions contained in a debt facility could result in an event of default under one or more of our other debt facilities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under a debt facility, and the expiration of any grace periods, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under one or more of our other debt facilities, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If this were to occur, our assets may not be sufficient to fully repay the amounts due under our debt facilities or our other indebtedness.

Consolidation in the health care industry could lead to demands for price concessions, or limit or eliminate our ability to sell to certain of our potential significant market segments.

The cost of health care has risen significantly over the past decade, and numerous initiatives and reforms initiated by legislators, regulators, and third-party payers to curb these costs have resulted in a consolidation trend in the medical device industry, as well as among our potential customers, including health care providers. This, in turn, has resulted in greater pricing pressures, which could limit our ability to sell to important market segments, group purchasing organizations, independent delivery networks, and large single accounts, such as the Veterans Administration in the United States, which continue to consolidate purchasing decisions for some of our potential health care provider customers. We expect that market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies, and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide health care industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances that may exert further downward pressure on our potential product prices, which would adversely impact our business and financial condition, and the results of operations.

We are subject to stringent domestic and foreign medical device regulation, and any adverse regulatory action may materially adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

We are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA and numerous other federal, state, and foreign governmental authorities. To varying degrees, each of these authorities monitors and enforces our compliance with laws and regulations governing the development, testing, clinical study, manufacturing, labeling, packaging, marketing, and distribution of our medical devices. These laws and regulations are subject to change, and to evolving interpretations that could increase costs, prevent or delay future device clearance or approvals, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to market currently cleared or approved devices. The process of obtaining marketing approval or clearance from the FDA and comparable foreign bodies for new products, or for enhancements or modifications to existing products, could:

We cannot be certain that new medical devices or new uses for existing medical devices will be cleared or approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies in a timely or cost-effective manner, if at all. In addition, the FDA may require post-market testing and surveillance, and may, depending on the results, prevent or limit further marketing of products. The failure to receive approval or clearance for significant new products or modifications to existing products, or the receipt of an approval of limited or reduced scope could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Both before and after a product is commercially released, we have ongoing responsibilities under the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and FDA regulations, which govern virtually all aspects of a medical device’s design, development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record keeping, adverse event reporting, sale, promotion, distribution, and shipping. Compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements is subject to continual review, and is monitored rigorously through periodic inspections by the FDA, which may result in observations on Form 483, and (in some cases) warning letters that require corrective action. If the FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our medical devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could:

Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively manufacturing, marketing, and selling our products. In addition, negative publicity and product liability claims resulting from any adverse regulatory action could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the FDCA permits device manufacturers to promote products solely for the uses and indications set forth in the approved product labeling. The U.S. Department of Justice has initiated a number of enforcement actions against manufacturers that promote products for “off-label” uses, alleging, among other things, that “off-label” promotion caused the submission of false and fraudulent claims for reimbursement to federal health care programs in violation of the Federal False Claims Act. Government enforcement action can result in substantial fines, penalties, and/or administrative remedies, including exclusion from government reimbursement programs and entry into Corporate Integrity Agreements (CIAs) with governmental agencies, entailing significant additional obligations and costs.

Foreign governmental regulations have become increasingly stringent and more common, and we may become subject to even more rigorous regulation by foreign governmental authorities in the future. Changes in clearance, approvals, or standards that must be complied with prior to commercial marketing, or the enactment of additional laws or regulations may cause delays in or prevent the marketing of a product. Penalties for a company’s noncompliance with foreign governmental regulation could be severe, including revocation or suspension of a company’s business license, and criminal sanctions. Any domestic or foreign governmental medical device law or regulation imposed in the future may have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations. 

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time-consuming, and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidate, our business will be substantially harmed.

The time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable, but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials, and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development, and may vary among jurisdictions.

Instability in international markets, or foreign currency fluctuations could adversely affect our results of operations.

We generate a significant amount of our revenue from outside the United States. As a result, we face currency and other risks associated with our international sales. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations due to transactions denominated primarily in euros, which may potentially reduce the U.S. dollars we receive for sales denominated in any of these foreign currencies, and/or increase the U.S. dollars we report as expenses in these currencies, thereby affecting our consolidated results of operations. Fluctuations between the currencies in which we do business have caused and will continue to cause foreign currency transaction gains and losses. We cannot predict the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations upon our future operating results because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposures, and the volatility of currency exchange rates.

In addition to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, there are a number of additional risks associated with our international operations, including those related to:

We are subject to anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and anti-money laundering laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws, and other laws governing our operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

As we grow our international presence and global operations, we will be increasingly exposed to trade and economic sanctions and other restrictions imposed by the United States, the European Union, and other governments and organizations. The U.S. Departments of Justice, Commerce, State, and Treasury, and other federal agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of economic sanctions laws, export control laws, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and other federal statutes and regulations, including those established by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Under these laws and regulations, as well as other anti-corruption laws, anti-money laundering laws, export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws, and other laws governing our operations, various government agencies may require export licenses, may seek to impose modifications to business practices (including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries or with sanctioned persons or entities, and modifications to compliance programs) that may increase compliance costs, and may subject us to fines, penalties, and other sanctions. A violation of these laws or regulations would negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are in the process of implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants, and agents with the FCPA, OFAC restrictions, and other export control, anti-corruption, anti-money-laundering, and anti-terrorism laws and regulations. We cannot assure you, however, that our policies and procedures are or will be sufficient, or that directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants, and agents have not engaged and will not engage in conduct for which we may be held responsible; nor can we assure you that our business partners have not engaged and will not engage in conduct that could materially affect their ability to perform their contractual obligations to us, or even result in our being held liable for such conduct. Violations of the FCPA, OFAC restrictions, or other export control, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, and anti-terrorism laws or regulations may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may experience delays or unforeseen issues during the requisite studies and trials required prior to regulatory approval of our medical devices.

Although there are no foreseeable risks with respect to obtaining an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE), following biocompatibility and active animal safety testing, even minor issues with the testing and application process can delay the IDE, which would in turn delay the clinical studies and increase the costs to complete the testing. For our PMA application, we will hire a regulatory consultant to facilitate all interactions with the FDA and ensure that we make the most time- and capital-efficient steps towards regulatory approval.

We may not be able to compete effectively with larger companies in the medical device space with greater resources and market recognition.

Our primary competitor, Medtronic, a provider of medical devices, has been involved in the manufacturing and sale of deep brain stimulation devices for several years. In addition, Boston Scientific and Abbott (formerly St. Jude Medical) have a CE mark and PMA to market and sell their neurostimulation implant devices in Europe and the U.S. These companies may have substantially greater financial, research and development, manufacturing, marketing, and sales experience, and resources than us. As a result, our competitors may be more successful than us in developing their products, obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing their products to users. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors.

We are dependent on a few significant customers for our businesses, and the loss of these customers could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

In our original equipment manufacturer (OEM) solutions business, we sell to over 30 customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017, sales to our two largest customers represented 76% of our sales revenue. The loss or reduction in services to these significant customers, or other discontinuation of their relationship with us for any reason—or, if either of these significant customers reduces or postpones purchases that we expect to receive—could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our neurostimulation device may not be approved for reimbursement, which could adversely affect the adoption of our device.

Even if the device and treatment are successful and approved for use, reimbursement may not be forthcoming, which could lead to slower-than-anticipated adoption of our technology. Additionally, new drugs or devices may also affect market acceptance. These risks are mitigated by the current reimbursement standards, which we believe our system will be reimbursed under. Additionally, our management team is experienced in device reimbursement, in the U.S. and in Germany, as well as throughout the European Union (EU). William Rosellini, our chief executive officer, is a published author in the area of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. Previously, he has utilized reimbursement consultants to map existing reimbursement codes in order to develop proper data collection and clinical trial design strategies to shorten the path to eventual Medicare reimbursement. Although our management team is experienced in device reimbursement, there can be no guarantee that our neurostimulation device will be approved for reimbursement, which could adversely affect the adoption of our device.

Laws and regulations that could affect the industry in which we operate may be enacted, which could result in a delay or cessation of our research and development activities, or the imposition of additional costs that could hinder our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations.

Current laws and regulations with respect to our industry, and additional laws and regulations that may be enacted in the future could impose new and/or unexpected operational considerations or constraints upon us. Complying with existing laws or regulations may require significant time and resource allocation for medical device manufacturers, including us. Additionally, changing or new legislation may force us to redesign one or more of our products. In such an event, our proprietary neurostimulation device may have to be altered or modified to ensure that it is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Such alterations or modifications would cause us to incur substantial research and development costs. Moreover, if we cannot modify or alter our neurostimulation device’s design or functionality, then our device could be rendered obsolete, which would substantially reduce our future profitability and harm our business. Additionally, since we intend to operate both domestically and in the EU, we must remain cognizant of the legislative and regulatory landscape in both regions. Compliance with these regulations, when applicable, increases the research and development and production costs, and could make our proposed products and services less attractive to potential customers.

International operations conducted by us subject us to a number of risks, including unfavorable political, regulatory, labor, and tax conditions.

We sell medical devices to customers located outside the United States. International operations are subject to the legal, political, regulatory, and social requirements and economic conditions in the jurisdictions in which they are conducted. Risks inherent to international operations and sales include, but are not limited to, the following:

Conducting business in foreign jurisdictions requires us to respond to rapid changes in market conditions in these countries. We believe that our overall success as a global business depends on our ability to succeed in different legal, regulatory, economic, social, and political situations and conditions. We may not be able to develop and implement effective policies and strategies in each foreign jurisdiction where we may do business in the future.

We depend on our key management personnel for our future success.

Our success depends largely on the skills of our key management and technical personnel. The loss of one or more of our key management and technical personnel may materially and adversely affect business and results of operations. We do not maintain key person insurance for any of our employees. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to replace any of our key management personnel in the event that their services become unavailable.

Our chief executive officer beneficially owns a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock, and will have the ability to significantly influence our affairs.

Our chief executive officer, William Rosellini, beneficially owns approximately 56.96% of our issued and outstanding capital stock, when combing his individual holdings and those of Rosellini Scientific, LLC (“RS”), of which he is the sole member and manager. By virtue of his holdings, he may significantly influence, or effectively control, the election of the members of our board of directors, our management, and our affairs, and other corporate transactions (such as mergers, consolidations, or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that are submitted to shareholders for approval, and that may not be favorable from our standpoint or that of our other shareholders.

We only have a limited number of employees to manage and operate our neurostimulation business segment.

As of the date of this prospectus, our neurostimulation business segment employed a total of 19 full-time employees and 4 consultants. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain adequate staffing levels to run our operations and/or to accomplish all of the objectives that we otherwise would seek to accomplish for the neurostimulation business segment.

Failure to raise the necessary capital could restrict our growth, limit our development of new products and services, and hinder our ability to compete.

We need to raise funds in order to achieve our business objectives. Failure to raise these funds may:

Any of these aforementioned consequences would have a materially adverse effect on our business, operations, and financial position.

Anti-takeover provisions may impede the acquisition of our Company.

Certain provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes have anti-takeover effects and may inhibit a non-negotiated merger or other business combination. These provisions are intended to encourage any person interested in acquiring us to negotiate with, and to obtain the approval of, our board of directors in connection with such a transaction. But certain of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of us, including an acquisition in which the stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity to do so, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Our products may be subject to recalls, even after receiving FDA clearance or approval, which would harm our reputation, business, and financial results.

We will be subject to the medical device reporting regulations, which will require us to report to the FDA if our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or have malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to occur. We will also be subject to the correction and removal reporting regulations, which will require us to report to the FDA any field corrections and device recalls or removals that we undertake to reduce a risk to health posed by the device, or to remedy a violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) caused by the device that may present a risk to health. In addition, the FDA and similar governmental agencies in other countries have the authority to require the recall of our products if there is a reasonable probability that the products would cause serious adverse health consequences or death. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us could occur as a result of manufacturing defects, labeling deficiencies, packaging defects, or other failures to comply with applicable regulations. Any recall would divert management attention and financial resources and harm our reputation with customers, and could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to product liability claims, and may not have sufficient product liability insurance to cover any such claims, which may expose us to substantial liabilities.

We may be exposed to product liability claims from users of our products. It is possible that any product liability insurance coverage we obtain will be insufficient to protect us from future claims. Further, we may not be able to obtain or maintain insurance on acceptable terms, or guarantee that such insurance would be sufficient to cover any potential product liability claim or recall. Failure to obtain or maintain sufficient insurance coverage could have a materially adverse effect on our business, prospects, and results of operations if claims are made that exceed our coverage.

Our revenues will depend upon adequate reimbursement from public and private insurers and health systems.

Our success will depend on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of our devices will be available from third-party payers, such as public and private insurers and health systems. Government and other third-party payers attempt to contain health care costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement of new treatments. Therefore, significant uncertainty usually exists as to the reimbursement status of new health care treatments. If we are not successful in obtaining adequate reimbursement for our treatment from these third-party payers, the market’s acceptance of our treatment could be adversely affected. Inadequate reimbursement levels also likely would create downward price pressure on our treatment. Even if we succeed in obtaining widespread reimbursement for our treatment, future changes in reimbursement policies could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are subject to numerous federal and state health care laws and regulations, and failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on our business and our ability to compete in the marketplace.

There are numerous laws and regulations that govern the means by which companies in the health care industry may market their treatments to health care professionals, and may compete by discounting the prices of their treatments, including, for example, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), and state law equivalents to these federal laws that are meant to protect against fraud and abuse (as well as analogous laws in foreign countries). Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including but not limited to (in some instances) civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, and exclusion from participation in federal and state health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation. Accordingly, we could potentially face legal risks if our interpretation differs from those of enforcement authorities. Further, from time to time we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage if our interpretation differs from those of our competitors.

Specifically, anti-kickback laws and regulations prohibit any knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation, or receipt of any form of remuneration (direct or indirect, in case or in kind) in return for the referral, use, ordering, or recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid, or other government-sponsored health care programs. We have entered into consulting agreements, research agreements, and product development agreements with physicians, including some who may order our products or make decisions to use them. In addition, some of these physicians own our stock, which they purchased in arm’s-length transactions on terms identical to those offered to non-physicians, or received as stock awards from us as consideration for services performed by them. While these transactions were structured with the intention of complying with all applicable laws, including state anti-referral laws and other applicable anti-kickback laws, it is possible that regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts may in the future view these transactions as prohibited arrangements that must be restructured, or for which we would be subject to other significant civil or criminal penalties. There can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view these arrangements as being in compliance with applicable laws, or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard the rules we have established. Because our strategy relies on the involvement of physicians who consult with us on the design of our potential products, perform clinical research on our behalf, or educate the market about the efficacy and uses of our potential products, we could be materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts interpret our financial relationships with physicians who refer or order our potential products to be in violation of applicable laws, and determine that we would be unable to achieve compliance with such applicable laws. This could harm our reputation and the reputations of the physicians we engage to provide services on our behalf. In addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be substantial since we could be subject to monetary fines and civil or criminal penalties. We could also be excluded from federally funded health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for noncompliance. Further, even the costs of defending investigations of noncompliance could be substantial.

Also, the FCA imposes civil liability on any person or entity that submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. Damages under the FCA can be significant and consist of the imposition of fines and penalties. The FCA also allows a private individual or entity (i.e., a whistleblower) with knowledge of past or present fraud against the federal government to sue on behalf of the government, and to be paid a portion of the government’s recovery, which can include both civil penalties and up to three times the amount of the government’s damages (usually the amount reimbursed by federal health care programs). The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the government takes the position that the marketing and promotional practices of life sciences product manufacturers, including the off-label promotion of products, the provision of inaccurate or misleading reimbursement guidance, or the payment of prohibited kickbacks to doctors or other referral sources may cause the submission of improper claims to federal and state health care entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid by health care providers that use the manufacturer’s products, which results in a violation of the FCA. In certain cases, manufacturers have entered into criminal and civil settlements with the federal government under which they entered into plea agreements, paid substantial monetary amounts, and entered into corporate integrity agreements that require, among other things, substantial reporting and remedial actions going forward.

In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians and other health care providers. In addition to federal laws, some states, such as California, Massachusetts, and Vermont, mandate implementation of commercial compliance programs, along with the tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation, and other remuneration to physicians. The shifting commercial compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with different compliance and/or reporting requirements in multiple jurisdictions increase the possibility that a health care company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.

The scope and enforcement of all of these laws is uncertain, and subject to rapid change, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. There can be no assurance that federal or state regulatory or enforcement authorities will not investigate or challenge our current or future activities under these laws. Any investigation or challenge could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any state or federal regulatory or enforcement review of us, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time consuming. Additionally, we cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a going-forward basis only.

Our use of sensitive patient information is subject to complex regulations at multiple levels, and we would be adversely affected if we failed to adequately protect this sensitive information.

We process, maintain, and utilize personal health and other confidential and sensitive data. In particular, we have developed a web and mobile application through which our customers can communicate with physicians and others, which may involve sharing patient identifiable health information. The use and disclosure of such information is regulated at the federal, state, and international levels, and these laws, rules, and regulations are subject to change and increased enforcement activity, such as the audit program implemented by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under HIPAA. International laws, rules, and regulations governing the use and disclosure of such information are generally more stringent than in the United States, and they vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Noncompliance with any privacy or security laws or regulations, or any security breach, cyber-attack, or cybersecurity breach, as well as any incident involving the theft, misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, sensitive or confidential information, whether by us or by another third party, could require us to expend significant resources to remediate any damage, interrupt our operations, and damage our brand and reputation, and could also result in investigations, regulatory enforcement actions, material fines and penalties, loss of customers, litigation, or other actions that could have a materially adverse effect on our business, brand, reputation, cash flows, and operating results.

Our business depends on provider and patient willingness to entrust us with health-related and other sensitive personal information. Events that negatively affect that trust, including inadequate disclosure of our uses of their information, failure to keep our information technology systems and sensitive information secure from significant attack, theft, damage, loss, or unauthorized disclosure or access, whether as a result of our action or inaction, or that of third parties, could adversely affect our brand, reputation, and revenues, and also expose us to mandatory disclosure to the media, litigation (including class action litigation) and other enforcement proceedings, material fines, penalties and/or remediation costs, and compensatory, special, punitive, and statutory damages, as well as consent orders and/or injunctive relief, any of which could adversely affect our business, cash flows, operating results, or financial position. There can be no assurance that any such failure will not occur—or, if any does occur, that we will detect it, or that it can be sufficiently remediated.

To be commercially successful, we must convince physicians that our devices are safe and effective alternatives to existing medical devices, and that our devices should be used.

We believe physicians will only adopt our devices if they determine, based on experience, clinical data, and published, peer-reviewed journal articles, that the use of our devices is a favorable alternative to conventional devices/methods. Physicians may be slow to change their practices for the following reasons, among others:

In addition, we believe that recommendations for and support of our devices by influential physicians are essential for market acceptance and adoption. If we do not receive this support or are unable to demonstrate favorable, long-term clinical data, physicians and hospitals may not use our devices, which would significantly reduce our ability to achieve revenue, and would prevent us from sustaining profitability.

The training required for physicians to use our Viant™ System could reduce the market acceptance of our products.

As with any new method or technique, physicians must undergo a thorough training program before they are qualified to perform the surgery to implant our Viant™ System. Physicians could experience difficulty with the technique necessary to successfully insert the device, and may not achieve the technical competency necessary to complete the training program. Even after successfully completing the training program, physicians could still experience difficulty implanting our Viant™ System, and, as a result, limit its use significantly in their practices, or cease utilizing it altogether.

In addition, we may experience difficulty growing the number of physicians who complete our training program if patient demand is low, if the length of time necessary to train each physician is longer than expected, if the capacity of our sales representatives to train physicians is less than expected, or if we are unable to sufficiently grow our sales organization. All of these events would lead to fewer trained physicians qualified to implant our Viant™ System, which could negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and impair our ability to grow our business.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act, and may remain an emerging growth company for up to five years. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include:

We cannot predict whether investors will find our Common Stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less-active trading market for our Common Stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is required to report upon the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. When and if we become a “large accelerated filer” or an “accelerated filer” and are no longer a “smaller reporting company,” each as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. For so long as we remain a smaller reporting company, however, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to smaller reporting companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404. Once we are no longer a smaller reporting company, or if, prior to such date, we opt to no longer take advantage of the applicable exemption, we will be required to include an opinion from our independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing, and possible remediation. To comply with the requirements of being a reporting company under the Exchange Act, we will need to upgrade our systems, including information technology; implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems, and procedures; and ensure we have hired sufficient accounting and finance staff.

Due to the recent acquisitions of foreign subsidiaries and integration of those entities, management is in the process of evaluating internal controls over financial reporting. As such, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2018, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective due to the lack of implementation of internal controls over financial reporting across all operating entities. If we fail to establish and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, file our periodic reports on a timely basis, maintain our reporting status, or prevent fraud. At times, we have not had sufficient accounting and supervisory personnel with the appropriate level of technical accounting experience and training necessary, or adequate formally documented accounting policies and procedures to support effective internal controls. As we grow, we will hire additional personnel and engage in external temporary resources, and may implement, document, and modify policies and procedures to maintain effective internal controls. We may identify deficiencies and weaknesses, or fail to remediate previously identified deficiencies in our internal controls. If material weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal controls exist and go undetected or un-remediated, our financial statements could contain material misstatements that, when discovered in the future, could result in our operating results being materially impacted, and we could fail to meet our future reporting obligations.

If we discover material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could decline significantly, and raising capital could be more difficult.

If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or if we fail to remediate the material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures in a timely fashion, our stock price could decline significantly, and raising capital could be more difficult. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports, and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our Common Stock could drop significantly. In addition, we cannot be certain that material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls will not be discovered in the future.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

We may be unable to complete or integrate intellectual property acquisitions effectively, which may adversely affect our growth, profitability, and results of operations.

We expect future acquisitions of intellectual property to play a significant role in our product development growth. As of the date hereof, we have made four such acquisitions; we cannot, however, be certain that we will be able to continue to identify attractive acquisition opportunities, obtain financing for acquisitions on satisfactory terms if needed, or successfully acquire identified targets. Additionally, we may not be successful in integrating acquired intellectual property into our existing operations and realizing anticipated synergies. Competition for acquisition opportunities in the industry in which we operate may increase our costs of acquisitions or cause us to refrain from engaging in acquisitions. These and other factors relating to our acquisition of intellectual property could negatively and adversely impact our growth, profitability, and results of operations.

Variability in intellectual property laws may adversely affect our intellectual property position.

Intellectual property laws—and patent laws and regulations in particular—have been subject to significant variability, either through administrative or legislative changes to such laws or regulations, or changes or differences in judicial interpretation. It is expected that such variability will continue to occur. Additionally, intellectual property laws and regulations differ between countries. Variations in the patent laws and regulations or in interpretations of patent laws and regulations in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property, and may change the impact of third-party intellectual property on us. Accordingly, we cannot predict the scope of patents that may be granted to us, the extent to which we will be able to enforce our patents against third parties, or the extent to which third parties may be able to enforce their patents against us.

We may need to negotiate modifications or extensions of existing intellectual property agreements.

We license intellectual property from third parties. In the future, we may need to extend, modify, or otherwise negotiate changes to such licenses. There can be no assurance that the third parties with whom we have (or in the future may have) agreements will agree to such modifications, or that, if they do, they will do so on terms favorable to us.

We or the third parties whom we license intellectual property from may become involved in legal proceedings to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could be expensive and time-consuming.

Competitors or others may infringe upon our intellectual property rights. To counteract infringement or unauthorized use, we or third parties whom we license intellectual property from may be required to file patent infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that certain of our intellectual property is not valid or is unenforceable, or the court may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our intellectual property rights do not cover such technology.

An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put our intellectual property at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, and could put outstanding intellectual property applications at risk of not being granted.

Interference proceedings brought by the United States Patent and Trademark Office may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our intellectual property applications. Litigation or interference proceedings may fail, and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs, diversion of resources, and distraction of our management. We or our licensors may not be able to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect such rights as comprehensively as in the United States.

Furthermore, due to the substantial amount of discovery associated with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our (or our licensors’) confidential information could be compromised by disclosure. In addition, during the course of this litigation, there could be public announcement of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, then it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our Common Stock. We or our licensors may not prevail in any litigation or interference proceeding in which we may be involved in the future. Even if we or our licensors do prevail, such legal proceedings would likely be expensive and time-consuming.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how related to any of our product candidates, our competitive position would be impaired and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Some of our technology, including our knowledge regarding the processing of our product candidates, is unpatented, and is maintained by us as trade secrets. In an effort to protect these trade secrets, the information is restricted to our employees, consultants, collaborators, and advisors on a need-to-know basis only. In addition, we require our employees, consultants, collaborators, and advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of their relationships with us. These agreements require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. These agreements, however, do not ensure protection against improper use or disclosure of confidential information, and these agreements may be breached. A breach of confidentiality could affect our competitive position. In addition, in some situations, these agreements and other obligations of our employees to assign intellectual property to us may conflict with or be subject to the rights of third parties with whom our employees, consultants, collaborators, or advisors have had previous employment or consulting relationships. Also, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.

Adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information. The disclosure of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position, and could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may become subject to claims of infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from developing our treatment, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages. We have not obtained and do not intend to obtain any legal opinion with regard to our freedom to practice our technology.

Third parties could assert that our processes, product candidates, or technology infringe upon their patents or other intellectual property rights. Whether a process, product, or technology infringes upon a patent or other intellectual property involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. We cannot be certain that we will not be found to have infringed upon the intellectual property rights of others. Because patent applications may remain unpublished for certain periods of time and may take years to be issued as patents, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, and/or that do not currently contain claims of concern but may later result in issued patents that our product candidates, procedures, or processes will infringe upon. There may be existing patents that our product candidates, procedures, or processes infringe upon, of which infringement we are not aware. Third parties could also assert ownership over our intellectual property. Such an ownership claim could cause us to incur significant costs to litigate the ownership issues. If an ownership claim by a third party were upheld as valid, we may be unable to obtain a license from the third party on acceptable terms, to continue to make, use, or sell technology free from claims by that third party of infringement upon the third party’s intellectual property. We have not obtained and do not intend to obtain any legal opinion with regard to our freedom to practice our technology at this time.

If we are unsuccessful in actions we bring against the patents of other parties, and it is determined that we infringe upon the patents of third parties, we may be subject to injunctions, or otherwise prevented from commercializing potential products and/or services in the relevant jurisdiction; or may be required to obtain licenses to those patents, or develop or obtain alternative technologies, any of which could harm our business. Furthermore, if such challenges to our patent rights are not resolved in our favor, we could be delayed or prevented from entering into new collaborations, or from commercializing certain product candidates and/or services, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

If we are successful in obtaining patent protection, we may not be able to enforce those patent rights against third parties.

Successful challenge of any future patents, such as through opposition, reexamination,  inter partes  review, interference, or derivation proceedings could result in a loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential or sensitive information could be compromised by disclosure in the event of litigation. In addition, during the course of litigation, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our Common Stock.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property in countries outside of the United States.

Intellectual property law outside the United States is uncertain, and, in many countries, is currently undergoing review and revisions. The laws of some countries do not protect patent and other intellectual property rights to the same extent as United States laws. Third parties may challenge our patents in foreign countries by initiating proceedings, including pre- and post-grant oppositions and invalidation proceedings. Developments during opposition or invalidation proceedings in one country may directly or indirectly affect a corresponding patent or patent application in another country in an adverse manner. It may be necessary or useful for us to participate in proceedings to determine the validity of our patents or our competitors’ patents that have been issued in countries other than the United States. This could result in substantial costs, divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, and have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO COMMERCIALIZATION

If we are unable to obtain required regulatory approvals, we will be unable to market and sell our product candidates.

Our product candidates are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to development, clinical trials, manufacturing, oversight of clinical investigators, record keeping, and commercialization. Rigorous pre-clinical testing and clinical trials, and an extensive regulatory review and approval process are required to be successfully completed in the United States, and in each foreign jurisdiction in which we offer our products before a new drug or other product can be sold in such jurisdictions. Satisfaction of these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time-consuming, uncertain, and subject to unanticipated delays. The time required to obtain approval by the FDA or the regulatory authority in other jurisdictions is unpredictable and often exceeds five years following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the complexity of the product candidate and the requirements of the applicable regulatory agency.

In connection with the clinical development of our product candidates, we face risks that:

Only a small percentage of product candidates for which clinical trials are initiated receive approval for commercialization. Furthermore, even if we do receive regulatory approval to market a product candidate, any such approval may be subject to limitations such as those on the indicated uses for which we may market a particular product candidate.

Specifically, design verification, process validation, and testing requirements for our Viant™ System are nearly complete, and management expects we will complete the technical file in the first half of 2019. We expect to receive a CE Mark in 2019, but to date this has not been granted, and we cannot be certain that this will be granted.

Our product candidates have not completed sufficient clinical trials to obtain regulatory approval, and may never demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy in order to do so.

Our product candidates are in the clinical and pre-clinical stages of development. In order to achieve profitable operations, we alone (or in collaboration with others) must successfully license, develop, manufacture, introduce, and market our products. The time frame necessary to achieve market success for any individual product—whether or not we develop it—is long and uncertain. The products we are currently developing will require significant additional research, development, and pre-clinical and clinical testing prior to application for commercial use or sale. A number of companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after showing promising results in early or later-stage studies or clinical trials. Additionally, we may encounter problems in our clinical trials that may cause us to delay, suspend, or terminate those clinical trials.

If clinical trials or regulatory approval processes for our product candidates are prolonged, delayed, or suspended, we may be unable to commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis, which would require us to incur additional costs and delay our receipt of any revenue from potential product sales.

If our product candidates are licensed, we cannot predict whether we will encounter problems with any planned clinical trials that will cause us or any regulatory authority to delay or suspend those clinical trials, or delay the analysis of data derived from them. A number of events, including any of the following, could delay the completion of our ongoing and planned clinical trials, and negatively impact our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and to market and sell, a particular product candidate:

Commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed by the imposition of additional conditions on our clinical trials by the FDA or any other applicable foreign regulatory authority, or the requirement of additional supportive studies by the FDA or any foreign regulatory authority. In addition, clinical trials require sufficient patient enrollment, which is a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the availability of effective treatments for the relevant disease, the conduct of other clinical trials that compete for the same patients as our clinical trials, and the eligibility criteria for our clinical trials. Our failure to enroll patients in our clinical trials could delay the completion of the clinical trials beyond our expectations. In addition, the FDA could require us to conduct clinical trials with a larger number of subjects than we may have projected for any of our product candidates. We may not be able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in a timely or cost-effective manner. Furthermore, enrolled patients may drop out of our clinical trials, which could impair the validity or statistical significance of the clinical trials.

We do not know whether our clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured, or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Delays in our clinical trials will result in increased development costs for our product candidates, and our financial resources may be insufficient to fund any incremental costs. In addition, if our clinical trials are delayed, our competitors may be able to bring products to market before we do, and the commercial viability of our product candidates could be limited.

Our product candidates will remain subject to ongoing regulatory review even if they receive marketing approval, and if we lose these approvals, the sale of any of our approved commercial products could be suspended.

Even if we receive regulatory approval to market a particular product candidate, the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, and record keeping related to the product will remain subject to extensive regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements of the FDA and other applicable domestic and foreign regulatory authorities, or discover any previously unknown problems with any approved product, manufacturer, or manufacturing process, we could be subject to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions, including:

Our industry is highly competitive, and our product candidates may become obsolete.

We are engaged in a rapidly evolving field. Competition from other pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, and research and academic institutions is intense and likely to increase. Many of those companies and institutions have substantially greater financial, technical, and human resources than we do. Those companies and institutions also have substantially greater experience in developing products, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approval, and manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical products. Many of our competitors have already succeeded in obtaining regulatory approval for their products, and may continue to do so more rapidly than we do. Competitors have developed or are in the process of developing technologies that are, or in the future may be, the basis for competitive products. Our competitors may succeed in developing products that are more effective and/or cost competitive than those we are developing, or that would render our product candidates less competitive or even obsolete. In addition, one or more of our competitors may achieve product commercialization or patent protection earlier than we do, which could materially adversely affect our business.

If physicians and patients do not accept our future products, or if the market for indications for which any product candidate is approved is smaller than expected, we may be unable to generate significant revenue, if any.

Even if any of our product candidates obtain regulatory approval, they may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, and third-party payers. Physicians may decide not to recommend our products for a variety of reasons, including:

If any of our product candidates are approved but fail to achieve market acceptance, or such market is smaller than anticipated, we may not be able to generate significant revenue, and our business would suffer.

Our ability to generate product and/or licensing revenues will be diminished if our therapies sell for inadequate prices or patients are unable to obtain adequate levels of reimbursement.

Our ability to commercialize our therapies, alone or with collaborators, will depend in part upon the extent to which reimbursement will be available from private health maintenance organizations, health insurers, and other health care payers. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved health care products. Health care payers are challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. Cost-control initiatives could decrease the price that we would receive for any products in the future, which would limit our revenue and profitability. Government and other health care payers increasingly attempt to contain health care costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for drugs and therapeutics. We might need to conduct post-marketing studies in order to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of any future products to such payers’ satisfaction. Such studies might require us to commit a significant amount of management time and financial and other resources. Our future products might not ultimately be considered cost-effective. Even if one of our product candidates is approved by the FDA, insurance coverage may not be available, and reimbursement levels may be inadequate to cover such therapies. If government and other health care payers do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels for one of our products, once approved, market acceptance of such product could be reduced.

Our internal computer systems, or those of our third-party service providers, licensees, licensors, collaborators, or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption in our business and operations.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our current and future service providers, licensees, licensors, collaborators, and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. While we are not aware of any such material system failure, accident, or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed, on-going, or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significant costs to recover or reproduce the data. Likewise, we rely on third parties to manufacture our drug candidates and conduct clinical trials, and similar events relating to their computer systems could also have a materially adverse effect on our business. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liabilities, and the further development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed.

Due in part to our limited financial resources, we may fail to select or capitalize on the most scientifically, clinically, or commercially promising or profitable indications or therapeutic areas for our product candidates, or those that are in-licensed, and/or we may be unable to pursue the clinical trials that we would like to pursue.

We have limited technical, managerial, and financial resources to determine the indications on which we should focus the development efforts related to our product candidates. Due to our limited available financial resources, we may have curtailed clinical development programs and activities that might otherwise have led to more rapid progress of our product candidates through the regulatory and development processes.

We may make incorrect determinations with regard to the indications and clinical trials on which to focus the available resources that we do have. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain adequate staffing levels to run our operations, and/or to accomplish all of the objectives that we otherwise would seek to accomplish. Our decisions to allocate our research, management, and financial resources toward particular indications or therapeutic areas for our product candidates may not lead to the development of viable commercial products, and may divert resources from better opportunities. Similarly, our decisions to delay or terminate drug development programs may also cause us to miss valuable opportunities.

If the third parties on which we rely for the conduct of our clinical trials and results do not perform our clinical trial activities in accordance with good clinical practices and related regulatory requirements, we may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates.

We use independent clinical investigators and other third-party service providers to conduct and/or oversee the clinical trials of our product candidates, and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. We rely heavily on these parties for successful execution of our clinical trials. Nonetheless, we are responsible for confirming that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the FDA’s requirements and our general investigational plan and protocol.

The FDA requires us and our clinical investigators to comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as good clinical practices, for conducting clinical trials and recording and reporting their results to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate, and that the trial participants are adequately protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements. Third parties may not complete activities on schedule, or may not conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or the respective trial plans and protocols. The failure of these third parties to carry out their obligations could delay or prevent the development, approval, and commercialization of our product candidates, or result in enforcement action against us.

We have limited manufacturing capacity, and have relied on—and expect to continue to rely on—third-party manufacturers to produce our product candidates.

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or commercial quantities of our neurostimulation product candidates, and we lack the resources and the capabilities to do so. As a result, we currently rely on (and expect to do so for the foreseeable future) third-party manufacturers to supply our product candidates. Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured our product candidates or products ourselves, including:

If we do not maintain our key manufacturing relationships, we may fail to find replacement manufacturers or develop our own manufacturing capabilities, which could delay or impair our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our products, and substantially increase our costs or deplete profit margins, if any. If we do find replacement manufacturers, we may not be able to enter into agreements with them on terms and conditions favorable to us, and there could be a substantial delay before new facilities could be qualified and registered with the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities. 

The FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities require manufacturers to register manufacturing facilities. The FDA and corresponding foreign regulators also inspect these facilities to confirm compliance with current standards. Contract manufacturers may face manufacturing or quality control problems causing drug substance production and shipment delays, or a situation where the contractor may not be able to maintain compliance with the applicable GMP requirements. Any failure to comply with such requirements, or other FDA and comparable foreign regulatory requirements, could adversely affect our clinical research activities, and our ability to develop our product candidates and market our products following approval. 

Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins, and our ability to develop our product candidates and commercialize any products that receive regulatory approval on a timely basis.

If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities, and may be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates and any products that we may develop.

The testing and marketing of medical products entail an inherent risk of product liability. Although we are not aware of any historical or anticipated product liability claims or specific causes for concern, if we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities, or be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates and any products that we may develop. In addition, product liability claims may also result in withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers, injury to our reputation, and decreased demand for any products that we may commercialize. If we are unable to obtain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost, potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of any products that we may develop, alone or with corporate partners.

The medical device industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change.

If our competitors are better able to develop and market products that are safer, more effective, less costly, or otherwise more attractive than any products that we may develop, our commercial opportunity will be reduced or eliminated.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to maintain a competitive position in the development of technologies and products for use in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

We face competition from established pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as from academic institutions, government agencies, and private and public research institutions in the United States and abroad. Most of the companies developing or marketing competing products are publicly traded, or divisions of publicly traded companies, and these companies enjoy several competitive advantages, including:

For example, Boston Scientific, Abbott Laboratories, and Medtronic—three companies with far greater financial and marketing resources than we possess—have each developed and are actively marketing neurostimulation devices that have been approved by the FDA. We may be unable to demonstrate that our systems offer any advantages over theirs. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with, mergers with, or acquisitions by large and established companies, or through the development of novel products and technologies.

The industry in which we operate has undergone, and is expected to continue to undergo, rapid and significant technological change, and we expect competition to intensify as technical advances are made. Our competitors may develop and patent processes or products earlier than us, obtain regulatory approvals for competing products more rapidly than us, and develop more-effective or less-expensive products or technologies that render our technology or products obsolete or non-competitive. We also compete with our competitors in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites, and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies and technology licenses complementary to our programs or advantageous to our business. If our competitors are more successful than us in these matters, our business may be harmed.

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities, or enter and maintain arrangements with third parties to sell and market our products, our business may be harmed.

We do not have a sales organization, and have no experience as a company in the sales, marketing, and distribution of medical devices. To be successful in commercializing our products, we must either develop a sales and marketing infrastructure or enter into distribution arrangements with others to market and sell our products. We have not yet hired any European sales people or entered into any third-party distribution agreements.

We currently plan to establish our own direct U.S. sales force. If we develop our own marketing and sales capabilities, our sales force will be competing with the experienced and well-funded marketing and sales operations of our more established competitors. Developing a sales force is expensive and time consuming, and could delay or limit the success of any product launch. We may not be able to develop this capacity on a timely basis, or at all. If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities, we will need to contract with third parties to market and sell our products in the United States. To the extent that we enter arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing, and distribution services in the United States or internationally, our product revenue could be lower than if we directly marketed and sold our products or related devices that we may develop.

Furthermore, to the extent that we enter co-promotion or other marketing and sales arrangements with other companies, any revenue received will depend on the skills and efforts of others, and we do not know whether these efforts will be successful. Some of our future distributors may market their own products or other companies’ products that compete with ours, and they may have an incentive not to devote sufficient efforts to marketing our products. If we are unable to establish and maintain adequate sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, independently or with others, we may not be able to generate product revenue, and may not become profitable.

The manufacturing facilities of our special process suppliers (e.g., neurostimulation device manufacture, extension manufacture, lead manufacture, sterilization, and calibration) must also comply with strictly enforced regulatory requirements. If we fail to achieve regulatory approval for our own manufacturing facilities or those of our suppliers, our business and our results of operations would be harmed.

Completion of our clinical trials and commercialization of our products require access to, or the development of, manufacturing facilities that comply with the FDA’s Quality Systems Regulation and Good Manufacturing Practice requirements. The FDA must approve facilities that manufacture our products for domestic commercial purposes, as well as the manufacturing processes and specifications for the product.

We depend on single-source suppliers for some of the components in our neurostimulation system. The loss of these suppliers could delay our clinical trials, or prevent or delay commercialization of our products.

Although we have identified several vendors for the components of our products, some of our components are currently provided by only one vendor, or a single-source supplier. In addition, we do not have long-term contracts with our third-party suppliers of some of the equipment and components that are used in our manufacturing process, and we do not carry a significant inventory of most components used in our products. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for these components, and obtaining any additional regulatory approvals that may result from adding or replacing suppliers will take a substantial amount of time. We may also have difficulty obtaining similar components from other suppliers that are acceptable to the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities. Furthermore, since some of these suppliers are located outside of the United States, we are subject to foreign export laws and U.S. import and customs regulations, which complicate and could delay shipments to us.

If we must switch to replacement suppliers, we will face additional regulatory delays, and the manufacture and delivery of our products would be interrupted for an extended period, which would delay completion of our clinical trials or commercialization of our products. In addition, we will be required to obtain prior regulatory approval from the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities to use different suppliers or components that may not be as safe or as effective. As a result, regulatory approval of our products may not be received on a timely basis, or at all.

If we do not achieve our projected development goals in the time frames we announce and expect, the commercialization of our products may be delayed and, as a result, the value of our stock may decline.

From time to time, we may estimate and publicly announce the anticipated timing of the accomplishment of various clinical, regulatory, and other product development goals, which we sometimes refer to as milestones. These milestones could include obtaining CE Mark approval in the European Union, the submission of PMA documentation to the FDA, initiation of our pivotal U.S. clinical trials, the enrollment of patients in our clinical trials, the release of data from our clinical trials, and other clinical and regulatory events. The actual timing of these milestones could vary dramatically compared to our estimates, in some cases for reasons beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will meet our projected milestones. If we do not meet these milestones as publicly announced, the commercialization of our products may be delayed and, as a result, the value of our stock may decline.

We depend on our officers, and if we are not able to retain them or recruit additional qualified personnel, our business will suffer.

Due to the specialized knowledge each of our officers possesses with respect to interventional medicine and our operations, the loss of service of any of our officers could delay or prevent the successful completion of our neurostimulation device development and the commercialization of our products. Each of our officers may terminate their employment without notice and without cause or good reason.

Upon receiving regulatory approval for our products, we expect to expand our operations and grow our research and development, product development, and administrative operations. Our growth will require hiring a significant number of qualified clinical, scientific, manufacturing, commercial, and administrative personnel. Accordingly, recruiting and retaining such personnel in the future will be critical to our success. There is intense competition from other companies and research and academic institutions for qualified personnel in the areas of our activities. If we fail to identify, attract, retain, and motivate these highly skilled personnel, we may be unable to continue our development and commercialization activities.

If we are unable to manage our expected growth, we may not be able to commercialize our products, including our neurostimulation system.

If we obtain CE Mark and FDA approvals for our products, we intend to continue to expand our operations, grow our research and development, product development, and administrative operations, and invest substantially in our manufacturing facilities. This expansion has and is expected to continue to place a significant strain on our management and operational and financial resources. To manage any expected growth, and to commercialize our products, we will be required to improve existing and implement new operational and financial systems, procedures, and controls, and expand, train, and manage our growing employee base. Our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures, and controls may not be adequate to support our anticipated growth. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our business could be harmed.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Our shares may be thinly traded with wide share price fluctuations, low share process, and minimal liquidity.

Our shares of Common Stock began trading on the OTCQB exchange on September 27, 2017, and have experienced limited trading activity. The share price may be volatile, with wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including:

In addition, if our shares are quoted on another trading platform or exchange for which we qualify, our share price may be affected by factors that are unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance. Our share price might be affected by general economic, political, and market conditions such as recessions, interest rates, or international currency fluctuations. In addition, stocks traded over the OTC Markets quotation system are usually thinly traded, highly volatile, and not followed by analysts. These factors, which are not under our control, may have a material effect on our share price, and cause the share price to drop below the price you pay in this offering.

Because we can issue additional shares of Common Stock, purchasers of our Common Stock may suffer immediate dilution, and may experience further dilution in the future .

We are authorized to issue up to 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock. As of July 10, 2018, 1,965,646 shares of Common Stock are issued and outstanding. Our board of directors has the authority to mandate the issuance of additional shares of Common Stock without the consent of any of our shareholders. Consequently, our shareholders may experience further dilution of their ownership in the Company in the future, which could have an adverse effect on the trading market for our Common Stock.

We have not paid cash dividends in the past, and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our Common Stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our Common Stock will depend on earnings, financial condition, and other business and economic factors affecting us at such time as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our Common Stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates.

If we are not successful in listing our Common Stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market or other national securities exchanges, our Common Stock is deemed a “penny stock,” which would make it more difficult for our investors to sell their shares.

Our Common Stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules adopted under Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act. The penny stock rules generally apply to companies whose Common Stock is not listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market or other national securities exchanges, and trades at less than $4.00 per share (other than companies that have had average revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the last three years, or that have tangible net worth of at least $5,000,000 [$2,000,000 if the company has been operating for three or more years]). These rules require, among other things, that brokers who trade penny stocks to persons other than “established customers” complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors, and provide investors with certain information concerning trading in the security, including a risk disclosure document and quote information under certain circumstances. Many brokers have decided not to trade penny stocks because of the requirements of the penny stock rules, and, as a result, the number of broker-dealers willing to act as market makers in such securities is limited. If we remain subject to the penny stock rules for any significant period, it could have an adverse effect on the market, if any, for our securities. If our securities are subject to the penny stock rules, investors will find it more difficult to dispose of our securities. We have applied to have our Common Stock listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “NXMD.” Although we believe we will satisfy The NASDAQ Capital Market listing requirements, no assurance can be given that such listing will be achieved in a timely manner, or at all.

Our stock price may be volatile; you may not be able to resell your shares at or above your purchase price.

The market prices for our securities and the securities of companies similar to ours have been highly volatile, with price and volume fluctuations, and may continue to be highly volatile in the future. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our Common Stock, some of which are beyond our control:

Risks Related To Our Reverse Stock Split

We effected a 1-for-14 Reverse Stock Split of our outstanding Common Stock on June 25, 2018. However, the Reverse Stock Split may not increase our stock price sufficiently and we may not be able to list our Common Stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market.

We expect that the 1-for-14 Reverse Stock Split of our outstanding Common Stock will increase the market price of our common stock so that we will be able to meet the minimum bid price requirement of the Listing Rules of The NASDAQ Capital Market. However, the effect of the Reverse Stock Split upon the market price of our Common Stock cannot be predicted with certainty, and the results of reverse stock splits by companies in similar circumstances have been varied. It is possible that the market price of our Common Stock following the Reverse Stock Split will not increase sufficiently for us to be in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. If we are unable meet the minimum bid price requirement, we may be unable to list our shares on The NASDAQ Capital Market.

Even if the Reverse Stock Split achieves the requisite increase in the market price of our Common Stock, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to comply with the minimum bid price requirement of The NASDAQ Capital Market.

Even if the Reverse Stock Split achieves the requisite increase in the market price of our Common Stock to be in compliance with the minimum bid price of The NASDAQ Capital Market, we cannot assure you that the market price of our Common Stock following the Reverse Stock Split will remain at the level required for continuing compliance with that requirement. It is not uncommon for the market price of a company’s Common Stock to decline in the period following a reverse stock split. If the market price of our Common Stock declines following the effectuation of a reverse stock split, the percentage decline may be greater than would occur in the absence of a reverse stock split. In any event, other factors unrelated to the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding, such as negative financial or operational results, could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock and jeopardize our ability to meet or maintain The NASDAQ Capital Market’s minimum bid price requirement. In addition to specific listing and maintenance standards, The NASDAQ Capital Market has broad discretionary authority over the initial and continued listing of securities, which it could exercise with respect to the listing of our Common Stock.

Even if the Reverse Stock Split increases the market price of our Common Stock, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with other continued listing standards of The NASDAQ Capital Market.

Even if the market price of our Common Stock increases sufficiently so that we comply with the minimum bid price requirement, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with the other standards that we are required to meet in order to maintain a listing of our Common Stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market. Our failure to meet these requirements may result in our Common Stock being delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market, irrespective of our compliance with the minimum bid price requirement.

The Reverse Stock Split may decrease the liquidity of the shares of our Common Stock.

The liquidity of the shares of our Common Stock may be affected adversely by the Reverse Stock Split given the reduced number of shares that will be outstanding following the Reverse Stock Split, especially if the market price of our Common Stock does not increase as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the reverse stock split may increase the number of stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares) of our Common Stock, creating the potential for such stockholders to experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and greater difficulty effecting such sales.

Following the Reverse Stock Split, the resulting market price of our Common Stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our Common Stock may not improve.

Although we believe that a higher market price of our Common Stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, we cannot assure you that the Reverse Stock Split will result in a share price that will attract new investors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance that the market price of our Common Stock will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our Common Stock may not necessarily improve.

RISKS RELATED TO THIS OFFERING

Investors in this offering will suffer immediate and substantial dilution.

Because the price per share of our Common Stock being offered is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock, you will suffer substantial dilution in the net tangible book value of the Common Stock you purchase in this offering. If you purchase shares of Common Stock and Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution of $           per share in the net tangible book value of the Common Stock. See the section entitled “Dilution” below for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you will incur if you purchase Common Stock in this offering.

Management will have broad discretion as to the use of the net proceeds from this offering, and we may not use these proceeds effectively.

We have not designated any portion of the net proceeds from this offering to be used for any particular purposes. Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering, and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our Common Stock. Accordingly, you will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of these net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. Our failure to apply these funds effectively could have a materially adverse effect on our business, delay the development of our product candidates, and cause the price of our Common Stock to decline. 

Future sales or issuances of our Common Stock may cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline.

The sale of substantial amounts of our Common Stock, whether directly by us or in the secondary market by existing security holders (including holders of our outstanding warrants and convertible debt), as well as the perception that such sales could occur, or the availability for future sale of shares of our Common Stock or securities convertible into (or exchangeable or exercisable for) our Common Stock could materially and adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock, and our ability to raise capital through future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. Any such sales may result in significant dilution to our existing shareholders, including you. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors in this offering. In addition, investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders, which will result in additional dilution to you.

There is no guarantee that we will be accepted for listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market. If we are accepted, but are not at any point able to comply with the applicable continued listing requirements or standards of The NASDAQ Capital Market, The NASDAQ Capital Market could delist our Common Stock.  

We have applied to have our Common Stock listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “NXMD”. Although we believe we will satisfy The NASDAQ Capital Market listing requirements, no assurance can be given that such listing will be achieved in a timely manner, or at all. In the event we successfully list our Common Stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, in order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing requirements and standards, including those regarding director independence and independent committee requirements, minimum stockholders’ equity, minimum share price, and certain corporate governance requirements. There can be no assurances that we will be able to comply with the applicable listing standards.

In the event that our Common Stock is delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market and is not eligible to be listed on another national securities exchanges, trading of our Common Stock could be conducted in the over-the-counter market, or on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the OTC Pink or OTCQB. In such event, it could become more difficult to dispose of or obtain accurate price quotations for our Common Stock, and there would likely also be a reduction in our coverage by securities analysts and the news media, which could cause the price of our Common Stock to decline further. Also, it may be difficult for us to raise additional capital if we are not listed on a major exchange.

If our Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, compliance with applicable state securities laws may be required for subsequent offers, transfers. and sales of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby.  

The securities offered hereby are being offered pursuant to one or more exemptions from registration and qualification under applicable state securities laws. We have applied to have our Common Stock listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “NXMD”. Although we believe we will satisfy The NASDAQ Capital Market listing requirements, no assurance can be given that such listing will be achieved in a timely manner, or at all. No assurance can be given that our application will be approved, and as such we are not required to register or qualify in any state the subsequent offer, transfer, or sale of the Common Stock, until such time as is necessary. If our Common Stock is delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market and is not eligible to be listed on another national securities exchange, subsequent transfers of the shares of our Common Stock offered hereby by U.S. holders may not be exempt from state securities laws. In such event, it will be the responsibility of the holder of shares to register or qualify the shares for any subsequent offer, transfer, or sale in the United States, or to determine that any such offer, transfer, or sale is exempt under applicable state securities laws.  

The Warrants are speculative in nature.

The Warrants to be issued to investors in this offering do not confer any rights of Common Stock ownership on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to purchase shares of Common Stock at a fixed price for a limited period of time. There can be no assurance that the market price of the Common Stock will ever equal or exceed the exercise price of the Warrants, and, consequently, whether it will ever be profitable for holders of the Warrants to exercise the Warrants.

If you purchase Units in this offering, as a holder of Warrants, you will have no rights as a Common stockholder with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants until you acquire our Common Stock.

If you purchase Units in this offering, until you acquire our Common Stock upon exercise of your Warrants, you will have no rights with respect to the Common Stock underlying the Warrants. Upon exercise of your Warrants, you will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common stockholder only as to matters for which the record date for actions to be taken by our common stockholders occurs after the date you exercise your Warrants.

There is no public market for the Warrants to purchase shares of our Common Stock being offered by us in this offering, and an active trading market for such Warrants is not expected to develop.

There is no established public trading market for the Warrants being offered in this offering, and, we do not expect that a market will develop. Without an active market, the liquidity of the Warrants will be limited.