If we were unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, this could hamper our ability to obtain further financing and meet our principal and interest payment obligations to our creditors. As a result, we may face liquidity constraints. In order to provide additional liquidity, we could be forced to reduce our planned capital expenditures, implement austerity measures and/or sell additional non-strategic assets to raise funds.

A reduction in our capital expenditure program could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, in particular, our ability to achieve our anticipated growth or maintain the operations of our current spaces Such events, if they occur, would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We have recorded negative cash flows from operating activities historically and may experience significant cash outflows or have net current liabilities in the future.

We have experienced significant cash outflow from operating activities historically. We had net cash used in operating activities of RMB52.1 million, RMB223.4 million, and RMB27.6 million (US$4.2 million) in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively. The cost of continuing operations could further reduce our cash position, and an increase in our net cash outflow from operating activities could adversely affect our operations by reducing the amount of cash available for our operations and business expansion.

Failure to generate positive cash flow from operations may adversely affect our ability to raise capital for our business on reasonable terms, if at all. It may also diminish the willingness of members or other parties to enter into transactions with us, and have other adverse effects that harm our long-term viability.

We had net current liabilities of RMB739.4 million and RMB371.6 million (US$56.9 million) as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Net current liabilities expose us to liquidity risk. We have satisfied our liquidity requirements primarily through equity financing activities and short-term/long-term borrowings. Such financing might not be available to us in a timely manner or on terms that are acceptable, or at all.

Our business will require significant working capital to support our growth. Our future liquidity and ability to make additional capital investments will depend primarily on our ability to maintain sufficient cash generated from operating activities and to obtain adequate external financing. We may not renew existing bank facilities or obtain equity or other sources of financing.

Our financial condition and operational results are affected by our occupancy rates. We face heightened risks as we rely on many large enterprise members to sustain our occupancy rates.

In pre-opening process, our spaces typically have a three to five month vacancy period to redevelop space and conduct other pre-opening preparation work. The vacancy period might also be longer than expected if we cannot attract members to our new spaces or maintain members of our existing spaces.

We rely on a limited number of key large enterprise members to sustain our occupancy rates. Our top 25 large enterprise members accounted for approximately 35.0% of our tenancy in terms of workstations as of December 31, 2020 and contributed to 16.9% of our total net revenue for 2020. Such concentration leads to heightened risks, for instance, if one of these key enterprises terminates its contract with us, our business could suffer.

Large enterprise members often sign membership agreements on longer lease terms and for larger spaces or a greater number of workstations than some of our other members. They generally account for a high proportion of our net revenue at a particular community. A default by a large enterprise member under its agreement with us could significantly reduce the operating cash flow generated by the community where that large enterprise member is situated.

In addition, the larger amount of available space occupied by any individual large enterprise member means that the time and effort required to execute a definitive agreement tailored for such a member is greater than that required for our standard membership agreements. In some instances, we agree to varying levels of customization of the spaces we license to these large enterprise members.

Large enterprise members may nevertheless delay commencement of their membership agreements, fail to make timely lease payments, declare bankruptcy or otherwise default on their obligations. Any of these events could result in the termination of that large enterprise member’s agreement with us and, potentially, sunk costs and transaction costs that are difficult or impossible for us to recover.

If the members choose not to continue using our spaces, new members may not use the current space or we need additional time and cost to redevelop the space. This may result in longer vacancy periods and adversely affect our operational results.

Our key operational metrics and other estimates may not accurately measure our operating performance.

We continually review the numbers of spaces, workstations, members and occupancy rates to evaluate our growth trends, measure our performance and make strategic decisions. We calculate these metrics using internal data and they may not be indicative of our future operating performance. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates for the applicable period of measurement, measuring how our spaces are used across a large member base involves significant challenges.

For example, the number of our members may include members who do not actively use our spaces or services. If investors do not perceive our operating metrics to accurately represent our operating performance, or if we discover material inaccuracies in our operating metrics, our business, financial condition and reputation may be materially adversely affected.

We require significant capital to fund our operations and growth. If we cannot obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms, our business, financial condition and prospects may suffer.

We require significant capital and resources for our operations and continued growth. We expect to make significant investments in the expansion and operations of our spaces, which may significantly increase our net cash used in operating activities. Our sales and marketing expenses may also increase to retain existing members and attract new members. In addition, we invest heavily in our technology systems, which are essential to our expansion and operations. It may take substantial time to realize returns on such investments, if at all.

We have historically funded our cash requirements primarily through capital contributions from our shareholders, short-term/long-term borrowings and securities offerings. If these resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to raise funds through additional equity offerings or debt financing or additional bank facilities.

Our ability to obtain additional capital in the future, however, is subject to a number of uncertainties, including our future business development, financial condition and results of operations, general market conditions for financing activities by companies in our industry, and macro-economic and other conditions in China and globally. If we cannot obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms to meet our capital needs, we may not execute our growth strategies, and our business, financial condition and prospects may be materially adversely affected.

Our advertising and branding services are subject to risks associated with concentration of customers.

The majority of our marketing and branding services revenue generated in 2020 was mainly attributed to one of our subsidiaries, Zhuhai Shengguang Zhongshuo Digital Marketing Co., Ltd., or Shengguang Zhongshuo, a digital marketing services provider we acquired in December 2018. In 2020, the top four customers of Shengguang Zhongshuo accounted for approximately 79.4% of our revenue from our advertising and branding services.

Such concentration leads to heightened risks. For example, any adverse changes or loss of one of our major customers of our advertising and branding services may materially decrease our marketing and branding services revenue, and any interruption or adjustments of those major customers’ businesses may lead to material fluctuations in our marketing and branding services revenue. Due to the decreased marketing and branding spending by certain major clients in 2020, our marketing and branding services revenue decreased by 40.6% from RMB534.8 million in 2019 to RMB317.5 million (US$48.7 million) in 2020.

In addition, the historical financial results of our marketing and branding services may not serve as an adequate basis for evaluating the future financial results of this segment. Our history of operating Shengguang Zhongshuo is limited and the concentration of customers increases the likelihood of material fluctuations of our marketing and branding services net revenue.

For example, we experienced substantial growth in net revenue from marketing and branding services in the third quarter of 2020 primarily due to the increased demand from major customers. However, such growth rate may not be sustainable since our net revenue from marketing and branding services will be largely impacted by fluctuations in demand for marketing and branding services from our major customers.

Our expansion into new regions, markets and business areas may pose increased risks.

We plan to expand our operations in China and overseas markets. To provide superior services to our members, we also intend to increase our U Plus service offerings. This expansion will incur significant costs, and inherently involves uncertainties and risks as we may encounter unexpected issues or situations for which we are unprepared.

As our business expands into new regions, we plan to invest substantial resources and may face new operational risks and challenges associated with business, economic and regulatory environments with which we are not familiar. We must understand and comply with local regulations, partner with local businesses or individuals, hire, train, manage and retain local workforce, and cope with members or potential members with different preferences.

In launching new spaces in a new region, we need to negotiate satisfactory leasing terms with local parties, adapt the designs and features of our spaces and services to accommodate local conventions, and adjust our pricing and marketing approaches based on local rental prices. All these adjustments we make may be ineffective and adversely affect our business. Our strategy of overseas expansion will further subject us to different cultural norms and business practices, risks relating to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and unpredictable disruptions as a result of security threats or political or social unrest and economic instability.

We have incurred, and may in the future incur, impairment loss on long-lived assets. Significant impairment of our long-lived assets could materially impact our financial position and results of our operations.

We have made significant investment in long-lived assets. We review our long-lived assets, including right-of-use of assets arising from certain long-term leases, property, plant and equipment and assets recorded in connection with business combinations, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may no longer be recoverable. When these events occur, we measure impairment by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition.

If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the fair value of the assets. The application of long-lived asset impairment test requires significant management judgment. If our estimates and judgments are inaccurate, the fair value determined could be inaccurate and the impairment may not be adequate, and we may need to record additional impairments in the future.

We had impairment loss on long-lived assets of RMB52.0 million in 2019 and RMB36.5 million (US$5.6 million) in 2020. These impairment losses primarily reflected impairment of right-of-use of assets arising from certain long-term leases, including certain long-term lease agreements with certain shareholders. For further information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Key Components of Results of Operations.” We could record additional impairments on long-lived assets in the future. Any significant impairment losses charged against our long-lived assets could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We face vigorous competition. If we are not able to compete effectively with others, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

While we are a leader in the Chinese agile office space industry, the industry remains at an early stage of development. If new companies launch competing solutions in the markets in which we operate, we may face

increased competition for members. Our competitors include global players, up-and-coming local companies and traditional workspace operators. Some competitors may have more resources, operate in more jurisdictions and be able to provide a better member experience at more competitive prices.

We may face heightened competition under certain operating models. For example, for our spaces under U Brand, our competitors may charge lower management fees and we may lose clients due to pricing or be forced to lower our fees. Our inability to compete effectively in securing new or repeat businesses could hinder our growth or adversely impact our operating results.

In addition, some of the services we provide or plan to provide are served by companies established in their markets. Failure to compete in such services markets could damage our ability to cultivate the vibrant community we seek to build.

Our success depends on the continuing efforts of our key management and capable personnel as well as our ability to recruit new talent. If we fail to hire, retain or motivate our staff, our business may suffer.

Our future success depends in a large part on the continued service of our key management. If we lose the services of any member of our key management, we may not hire suitable or qualified replacements, and may incur additional expenses to recruit and train new staff, which could severely disrupt our business and growth. If any member of our key management joins a competitor or forms a competing business, we may lose customers, know-how and key professionals and staff members.

Our rapid growth also requires us to hire, train, and retain a wide range of personnel that can adapt to a dynamic, competitive and challenging business environment and that help us conduct effective marketing, innovate new products and service offerings, and develop technological capabilities. We may need to offer attractive compensation and other benefits packages, including share-based compensation, to attract and retain them.

We also need to provide our employees with sufficient training to help them realize their career development and grow with us. Any failure to attract, train, retain or motivate experienced and capable personnel could severely disrupt our business and growth.

Certain of our affiliated persons or entities are now or may in the future lease the building spaces they own to us or have other transactions with us. We may have conflicts of interest with our officers and directors for such related party transactions and we may not resolve such conflicts on terms favorable to us.

Certain of our officers and directors are now or may in the future lease the building spaces they own to us or have other transactions with us. For example, we lease certain spaces from Youxiang Group, an affiliate of Dr. Daqing Mao, our founder. See “Related Party Transactions.” Those related parties negotiated satisfactory terms that are in the best interests of their businesses as a whole. Although our audit committee, consisting of independent non-executive directors, reviews and approves all proposed related party transactions, we may not resolve all potential conflicts of interest in this regard.

We have engaged in transactions with related parties, and such transactions present potential conflicts of interest that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In addition to leasing building spaces from related parties, we have entered into a number of other transactions with related parties. See “Related Party Transactions.” for more details. We may enter into additional transactions with our related parties. Interests of these related parties may not necessarily be aligned with our interests and the interests of our other shareholders.

For example, conflicts of interest may arise in connection with transaction arrangements which may be less favorable to us than similar arrangements negotiated with unaffiliated third parties. Conflicts of interest may also

arise in connection with the exercise of contractual remedies, such as the treatment of events of default. As a result, those related party transactions, individually or in the aggregate, may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Unexpected termination of leases or other arrangements, failure to negotiate satisfactory terms for or perform leases or other arrangements, failure to renew leases or other arrangements of our existing premises or to renew leases or other arrangements at acceptable terms could materially adversely affect our business.

Our ability to increase the number of spaces and to operate them profitably depends on the execution and performance of these leases or other arrangements and whether we can negotiate these leases and other arrangements on satisfactory terms. Lessors may also not duly perform their obligations under the leases or other arrangements due to various reasons, such as lessors’ failure to deliver the possession of the premises as agreed.

The increases in rental rates, particularly in markets where initial terms under our leases are shorter, could adversely affect our business. In addition, our ability to negotiate favorable terms to extend an lease agreement or in connection with an alternate space depend on prevailing conditions in the real estate market, such as overall lease expenses, competition from other would-be tenants for desirable leased spaces, our relationships with building owners and landlords, or other factors beyond our control. If we cannot renew or replace an expiring lease agreement, we will incur significant costs related to vacating that space or redeveloping the space, which could result in loss of members who may have chosen that space based on the design, location or other attributes of that particular space.

Strategic alternatives to pure leasing arrangements, such as acquisitions, strategic alliances and asset management agreements, accounted for a significant percentage of the spaces we obtain. These arrangements are generally more flexible and require less direct capital expenditures than a traditional lease arrangement but also involve risks and uncertainties. For example, we have experienced delays or failure to deliver the possession of the premises with some of the counterparties for various reasons, including the delay of completion of the construction and the change of title of the premises before delivery. Although we have experienced such delays or failures in limited cases, we could experience delays or failures to deliver the premises in the future. Disruption of these strategic arrangements will adversely affect our business.

Growth of our business will partially depend on the recognition of our brand. Failure to maintain, protect and enhance our brand would limit our ability to expand or retain our member base, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We believe that recognition of our brand among members and business partners has reduced member acquisition costs and contributed to the growth and success of our business. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing our brand remains critical to our business and market position. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing our brand depends on several factors, including our ability to:

•        maintain the quality and attractiveness of the services we offer;

•        maintain relationships with landlords and other business partners;

•        increase brand awareness through marketing and brand promotion activities;

•        comply with relevant laws and regulations;

•        compete effectively against existing and future competitors; and

•        preserve our reputation and goodwill generally and in the event of any negative publicity on our services and data security, or other issues affecting us, and China’s agile office space industry in general.

A public perception that we, or other industry participants do not provide satisfactory services, even if factually incorrect or based on isolated incidents, could damage our reputation, diminish the value of our brand, undermine the trust and credibility we have established and negatively impact our ability to attract and retain members, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks associated with the redevelopment and construction of the spaces we occupy.

Opening new spaces subjects us to risks associated with redevelopment projects in general, such as delays in construction, contract disputes and claims, fines or penalties levied by government authorities relating to our construction activities. We may also experience delays when opening a new space as a result of building owners or landlords not completing their base building work on time or as a result of delays in our obtaining land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations. Failure to open a space on schedule may result in lost revenue from that space, damage our brand and require that we lease and provide temporary space for our members.

Despite having our own design and building team during the development phase of our space, we rely in part on the availability and satisfactory performance of third-party general contractors and subcontractors to perform the actual construction work, and in many cases to select and obtain the related building materials. The timing and quality of the redevelopment of our occupied spaces depend on the performance of these third party contractors acting on our behalf.

The people we engage in connection with a construction project are subject to the usual hazards associated with providing construction and related services on construction project sites, which can cause personal injury, damage to or destruction of property, plant and equipment, and environmental damage. Although we are insured against many of these risks, our insurance coverage may be inadequate in scope or coverage amount, and may be insufficient to fully compensate us for losses arising from any such events.

Despite our detailed specifications and our inspection, project management and quality control procedures, in some cases, general contractors and their subcontractors may use improper construction practices or defective materials. Improper construction practices or defective materials can result in the need to perform extensive repairs to our spaces and potentially lead to personal injury. We could also suffer damage to our reputation, and may be exposed to possible liability, if these third parties fail to comply with applicable laws.

We incur significant costs related to the redevelopment of our spaces, which we may be unable to recover in a timely manner or at all.

Redevelopment of a space typically takes three to five months from the date we take possession of the space under the relevant occupancy agreement to the opening date. During this time, we incur substantial costs without generating any revenues from the space, especially the costs for spaces under our self-operated model for which we bear lease and redevelopment costs.

If we cannot complete our redevelopment and construction activities, or conditions in the real estate market or the broader economy change in unfavorable ways, we may be unable to recover these costs in a timely manner or at all. In addition, our redevelopment activities are subject to cost and schedule overruns as a result of many factors, some of which are beyond our control and ability to foresee, including increases in the cost of materials and labor.

We incur costs relating to the maintenance, refurbishment and remediation of our spaces.

Our lease agreements generally require that we keep the spaces we occupy in good status and we typically must maintain and repair spaces we decorate. Our lease agreements for overseas spaces may also require us to return the space to the landlord at the end of the term in the same condition it was delivered to us, which, in such instances, will require removing all fixtures and improvements to the space. The costs associated with this maintenance, removal and repair work may be significant.

We may also have to periodically refurbish our spaces to keep pace with the changing needs of our members. Extensive refurbishments may be costly and time-consuming and negatively impact our operational and financial performance. Our member experience may also be adversely affected if extensive refurbishments disrupt our operations at our spaces.

The long-term and fixed cost nature of our leases may limit our operating flexibility and could adversely affect our liquidity.

We currently lease a significant majority of our spaces under long-term leases with an average term of approximately eight years. Our obligations to landlords under these agreements extend for periods that significantly exceed the length of our membership agreements with our members, which our members may terminate upon one-month’s notice. Our leases generally provide for fixed monthly payments that are not tied to member usage or the size of our member base, and all of our leases contain minimum lease payment obligations.

As a result, if members at a particular space terminate their membership agreements with us and if we are unable to attract our members to actively use our spaces or services, our lease expenses may exceed our net revenue. In areas where retail cost for real estate is decreasing, we may not lower our fixed monthly payments under our leases to rates commensurate with prevailing market rates. At the same time, we would be pressured to lower our membership fees charged to the members, potentially resulting in our lease expense exceeding our net revenue. In such events, we could not reduce our lease expenses or otherwise terminate the relevant lease in accordance with its terms.

If we experience a prolonged reduction in net revenue at a particular space, our results of operations in respect of that space would be adversely affected unless and until either the lease expires, or we are able to assign the lease or sublease the space to a third party, or we default under the lease and cease operations at the leased spaces. Our ability to assign a lease or sublease the space to a third party may be constrained by provisions in the lease that restrict these transfers without the prior consent of the landlord.

In addition, we could incur significant costs if we decide to assign or sublease unprofitable leases, as we may incur transaction costs associated with finding and negotiating with potential transferees, and the ultimate transferee may require upfront payments or other inducements. A default under a lease could expose us to breach of contract and other claims which could result in direct and indirect costs to us, and could result in operational disruptions that could harm our reputation and brand.

Failure to comply with the terms of our indebtedness could result in default, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flow and liquidity.

We may enter into credit facilities and debt financing arrangements containing financial and other covenants that could, among other things, restrict our operations. If we breach any of these covenants, including the failure to maintain certain financial ratios, our lenders may accelerate our debt obligations. Any default under our credit facility could result in the repayment of these loans prior to maturity as well as the inability to obtain additional financing, which may materially adversely affect our cash flow and liquidity.

Some of the lease agreements of our leased properties have not been registered with PRC government authorities as required by PRC law, which may expose us to potential fines.

Under PRC law, we must register lease agreements of commodity housing tenancy with the local construction (real estate) departments. Some of our lease agreements for our leased properties in China, including leased properties for our spaces, have not been registered with PRC government authorities. The reasons for the incomplete registration and filing of lease agreements include:

•        the lessors failed to provide necessary documents for us to register the leases with the local government authorities;

•        certain local regulatory authorities do not process certain leases registration applications; and

•        we did not file registrations for certain of our lease agreements that were close to expiration.

Failure to complete the registration and filing of lease agreements will typically not affect the validity of the lease agreements. However, if the parties to the lease agreements fail to rectify such non-compliance within the prescribed timeframes after receiving notice from the PRC government authorities, they may be exposed to potential fines ranging from RMB1,000 to RMB10,000 for each unregistered lease, at the discretion of the relevant authority.

As advised by our PRC counsel, if we fail to rectify the unregistered leases within the period required by relevant government authorities, the maximum amount of potential fines arising from the unregistered leases would be approximately RMB0.8 million, as of the date of this prospectus. However, no material penalty has been imposed on us to date for the failure to register the relevant lease agreements.

We have taken several steps to strengthen our compliance for registration of lease agreements, including:

•        liaising with the relevant lessors to provide required documentation for completing the registration;

•        filing registrations for lease agreements that are close to expiration if such agreements are extended; and

•        strengthening our internal control procedures to ensure registration of lease agreements for our new spaces.

Property owners, government authorities or other third parties could challenge our rights to use our leased properties, which may disrupt our operations and incur relocation costs.

Certain lessors of our leased properties in China have failed to provide us with valid property ownership certificates or authorizations from the property owners for the lessors to sublease the properties. If such lessors do not have the relevant property ownership certificates or the right to lease or sublease such properties to us, the relevant rightful title holders or other third parties may challenge our use of such leased properties. As a result, we may be forced to vacate these properties and be required to seek alternative properties for lease or choose to terminate the lease earlier while bearing the penalty for early termination under the lease.

The usage of our leased properties might also be challenged by other various reasons, such as restrictions purposed by laws, regulations or policies based on the nature or usage of certain leased properties. With respect to these properties, if the lessors violate relevant laws and regulations for providing such leased properties to us, and incur penalties by government authorities, we may not lease and use such properties. In such an event, our operations may be interrupted, and we would incur relocation costs. Moreover, if third parties challenge our lease agreements, we could incur time, attention and costs associated with defending such actions, even if such challenges are ultimately determined in our favor.

If our promotional and marketing plans are not effective, our business and prospects may be negatively affected.

We invest in sales and marketing activities to promote our brand and spaces and deepen our relationships with members. We also pay for online advertisements to platforms to sustain our exposure and publicity. To foster our member base, we may offer discounts or other incentives, which incur costs and might not be effective for obtaining new members.

Our members may not appreciate our sales and marketing activities. The evolving marketing landscape may require us to experiment with new marketing methods to keep pace with industry trends and member preferences. Failure to refine our existing marketing approaches or introduce new marketing approaches in a cost-effective manner could reduce our members, occupancy rates and market share.

We also rely on a number of agencies, business partners and our own business development team to attract new members and enlarge our member base. Any disruption of our relationship with these intermediaries could harm our abilities to promote our business. We may not recover the costs of our sales and marketing activities and these activities may not retain or attract members.

A significant interruption in the operations of our suppliers could potentially disrupt our operations.

We partially rely on third-party suppliers for certain equipment, furniture and other fixtures. We also depend on third-party suppliers to provide certain services to facilitate our daily operations, such as security services and maintenance services. We have limited control over the operations of third-party suppliers, and any significant interruption in their operations may adversely impact our operations. For example, a significant interruption in the operations of our internet service provider could impact the operations of our applications, malfunctioning of our security equipment could lead to safety issues of our spaces, and lighting disruptions could result in poor member experience.

Disruptions in the supply chain may result from weather-related events, natural disasters, trade restrictions, tariffs, border controls, acts of war, terrorist attacks, pandemics, third-party strikes or ineffective cross dock operations, work stoppages or slowdowns, shipping capacity constraints, supply or shipping interruptions or other factors beyond our control. If we cannot resolve the impact of the interruptions of operations of our third-party suppliers or service providers, our operations and financial results may be materially adversely affected.

In some cases, we may rely on a single source for procurement of construction materials or other supplies in a given region. Any disruption in the supply of certain materials could disrupt operations at our existing spaces or significantly delay our opening of a new space, which may harm our reputation and brand.

A large portion of our members are concentrated in major metropolitan areas and certain industries. An economic downturn in any of these areas or industries may result in reduction of our members and adversely affect our results of operations.

A significant portion of our existing and target member base consists of SMEs who may be disproportionately affected by adverse economic conditions. In addition, the concentration of our operations in specific cities magnifies the risk of localized economic conditions in those cities or the surrounding regions to any business.

In 2018, 2019 and 2020, we generated the majority of our net revenue from our agile office spaces located in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Adverse changes in general economic conditions or real estate markets as well as relevant regulatory environment in these cities may disproportionately affect our member base, occupancy rates and/or pricing.

In addition, our members are concentrated in certain industries, such as the technology, media and telecommunications industries. Adverse changes in those industries may affect the demand for agile office spaces of our members and further affect our operation results. Our business may also be affected by generally prevailing economic conditions in the markets where we operate, which can result in a general decline in real estate activity, reduce demand for occupancy and our services and exert downward pressure on pricing.

We face risks related to natural disasters, extreme weather conditions, health epidemics and other catastrophic incidents, which could significantly disrupt our operations.

China has experienced significant natural disasters, including earthquakes, extreme weather conditions, as well as health scares related to epidemic or pandemic diseases, and any similar event could materially impact our business in the future. If a disaster or other disruption occurred that affects the regions where we operate our business, the resulting loss of personnel and damage to property could materially adversely affect our business. Even if we are not directly affected, such a disaster or disruption could affect the operations or financial condition of our ecosystem participants, which could harm our results of operations.

In addition, our business could be affected by public health epidemics, such as the outbreak of avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, Zika virus, Ebola virus, COVID-19 or other disease. In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) surfaced in China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, infections have spread globally. The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to constitute a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” on January 30, 2020 and characterized it as a pandemic on March 11, 2020.

To contain the COVID-19 outbreak, the PRC government imposed strict measures across the country including, but not limited to, travel restrictions, mandatory quarantine requirements, temporary closure of business premises, and postponed resumption of business. Our operations were severely disrupted in the first quarter of 2020 but gradually resumed after April 2020. In particular, most of our space in China temporarily shut down from February 2020 to April 2020 as a result of government restrictions and regulations. Due to the economic downturn in China and worldwide caused by COVID-19, the demand for our spaces has been adversely affected since January 2020.

As some of our members are vulnerable to the COVID-19 outbreak and the slowdown of the macroeconomic conditions, they could not make payments in a timely manner or stopped renewing their leases, resulting in decreased occupancy rates. Although China has controlled COVID-19 to some extent and our business started to recover after the second quarter of 2020, the potential impact brought by and the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak is difficult to assess or predict and the full impact of COVID-19 on our operations will depend on many factors beyond our control.

While it is unknown how long these conditions will last and what the complete financial effect will be on us, we are closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely affected to the extent that COVID-19 harms the Chinese and global economy in general.

Our business and our reputation may be affected if our employees or members of our community or guests who enter our spaces behave badly.

Our emphasis on our values makes our reputation particularly sensitive to allegations of violations of community rules or applicable laws by employees, members, or guests who enter our spaces. If employees, members or guests violate our policies or engage in illegal or unethical behavior, or are perceived to do so, we may be subject to negative publicity and our reputation may be harmed. This behavior may also lead to existing members ceasing to use our spaces, which would adversely impact occupancy and revenue for the affected spaces.

We are exposed to risks relating to our cooperation with our business partners.

We select and rely on a number of business partners to provide various services such as corporate secretary and human resources, to facilitate more service options and better experience for our members. Due to the reliance on such business partners, any interruption of their operations, any failure of them to accommodate our fast growing business scale, any termination or suspension of our partnership arrangements, any change in cooperation terms, or any deterioration of cooperative relationships with them may materially adversely affect our brand image and impact our operations.

We have limited control over our business partners. Failure by third parties to provide satisfactory services or comply with laws and regulations could subject us to reputational harm based on their association with us and our brand. If we become subject to claims arising from services provided by our business partners, we may attempt to seek compensation from the relevant business partners. However, such compensation may be limited.

If no claim can be asserted against a business partner, or we cannot fully recover amounts claimed from business partners, we may be required to bear such losses and compensation at our own costs. This could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not effectively identify, pursue and consummate strategic alliances, investments or acquisitions.

We may from time to time engage in evaluations of, and discussions with, possible domestic and international acquisitions, investments or alliance candidates. We may also make investments in private or public entities, enter into strategic alliances or issue securities through our parent company or subsidiaries.

We may not identify suitable strategic alliances, investment or acquisition opportunities. Even when we identify an appropriate acquisition or investment target, we may not negotiate the acquisition or investment successfully, obtain financing for the proposed transaction, or integrate the relevant businesses into our existing operations.

Since we retain limited control over the companies in which we only have minority stake, we cannot ensure that these companies will always comply with applicable laws and regulations. Non-compliance of regulatory requirements by our investees may cause substantial harm to our reputation and the value of our investment.

In addition, particular complexities, regulatory or otherwise, may be associated with our expansion into new markets. We may not successfully implement our strategies beyond our current markets. If we cannot effectively address these challenges, our ability to execute acquisitions as part of our long-term strategy will be impaired, which could adversely affect our growth.

We may not achieve the benefits we expect from recent and future investments and acquisitions and our operations may be materially adversely affected by such investments and acquisitions.

We have made equity investments in or acquisitions of businesses that we believe may complement our existing business or may improve the experience of our members. We may make future investments in private or public entities, enter into strategic alliances or issue securities through our parent company or subsidiaries.

While we believe those initiatives may benefit our business long term, such decisions may adversely impact our short- or medium-term operating results. Furthermore, if the businesses we acquire or in which we invest do not subsequently achieve the synergies we expect or do not generate the financial and operational benefits we expect, our investments and acquisitions may not benefit our business strategy or generate sufficient revenues to offset the associated investment or acquisition costs.

Investments and acquisitions present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including difficulty in integrating our operations with businesses we acquire or in which we invest, potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management attention and risks associated with offering new products and services or entering additional markets. For example, we invested in or acquired certain construction and decoration services providers and companies that provide value-added services to customers of agile office spaces.

We have limited experience in these new businesses and services and may fail to generate sufficient revenue or other value to justify our investments in these businesses and services. Our members may not respond favorably to our new services and solutions, which could damage our public image and market reputation and adversely affect our business.

In addition, investments and acquisitions could result in significant impairments to long-term investment, goodwill and other intangible assets. For example, we invested RMB17.3 million in a company providing consulting services, but the investment was fully impaired as of December 31, 2018 as we believe the carrying value of the investment was no longer recoverable.

Certain industry data and information in this prospectus were obtained from third-party sources and were not independently verified by us.

This prospectus contains certain industry data and information from third-party sources. We have not independently verified the data and information contained in such third-party publications and reports. Data and information in such third-party publications and reports may use third-party methodologies, which may differ from the data collection methods used by us. In addition, these industry publications and reports generally indicate that the information is believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information.

Statistical data in these publications also include projections based on a number of assumptions. The agile office space industry may not grow at the rates projected by market data, or at all. If any of the assumptions underlying the market data is later found to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections based on these assumptions. Material slowdown of the agile office space industry against the projected rates may have materially adversely affect our business and the market price of our ordinary shares.

We may not adequately protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use by others.

Our trademarks and other intellectual property are critical to our business. Any of our intellectual property rights could be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or misappropriated, or such intellectual property may not be sufficient to provide us with competitive advantages. Risks include the following:

•        Our pending applications for intellectual property rights may not be approved;

•        Our intellectual property rights may not be adequately protected;

•        Our intellectual property rights could be challenged by third parties or found by a judicial authority to be invalid or unenforceable;

•        Third parties may claim that we are infringing their rights, and we may not be successful in defending these claims; and

•        We may not enforce and defend our proprietary rights or prevent infringement or misappropriation, without substantial expense to us and a significant diversion of management time and attention from our business strategy.

To protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights, we rely and expect to rely on a combination of protective agreements with our team members and third parties (including local or other strategic partners we may do business with), physical and electronic security measures, and trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret

protection laws. If the measures we take to protect our proprietary rights do not prevent the use or misappropriation by third parties or such rights are diminished due to successful challenges, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, materially adversely affecting our ability to attract and retain members.

The proper functioning of our technology is essential to our business, and any difficulty experienced by such system would materially adversely affect us.

We use a combination of proprietary technology and technology from third-party service providers to support our business and our member experience. For example, U Bazaar, which we developed in-house but also incorporates third-party and open source software where appropriate, connects local spaces and develops and deepens connections among our members, both at a particular space and across our global network.

Third-party service providers may not support our products and services on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We may be subject to claims by third parties who maintain that our service providers’ technology infringes the third party’s intellectual property rights. Although our agreements with our third-party service providers often contain indemnities in our favor with respect to these eventualities, we may not be indemnified for these claims or we may not be successful in obtaining indemnification to which we are entitled.

If the technologies and systems that we use to manage the daily operations of our business or that we make available to our members malfunction, our ability to operate our business, retain existing members and attract new members may be impaired. We may not attract and retain sufficiently skilled and experienced professionals to operate and maintain these technologies and systems, and our product and service offerings may not continue to be, and new product and service offerings may not be, supported by the applicable third-party service providers on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Any harm to our members’ personal computers or other devices caused by our software, such as our apps, or other sources of harm, such as hackers or computer viruses, could adversely affect the member experience and our reputation.

We need to invest heavily on our technology to sustain and grow our business, and the uncertainties associated with the evolving customer needs and emerging industry standards create risks with respect to such investment. Our ongoing investment in technology may not generate the expected level of returns and failure to adopt new technologies to adapt to such changing environment may materially and adversely impact our business.

Our business generates and processes a large amount of data; the improper use or disclosure of such data by unauthorized persons could subject us to significant reputational, financial, legal and operational consequences.

We generate significant amount of proprietary, sensitive and otherwise confidential information relating to our business. We collect and store personal data regarding our members, including member names and billing data in our system. Privacy laws and regulations in PRC and other jurisdictions around the world govern the collection, protection and use of personal data. These laws and regulations are evolving and may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another.

Compliance with applicable privacy laws and regulations may lead to increases in our operating costs and adversely impact our ability to conduct our business and market our products and services to our members. Any failure by us or our third-party service providers to comply with applicable privacy laws, privacy policies or privacy-related contractual obligations may result in governmental enforcement actions, fines, litigation, other claims and adverse publicity.

Similar to other companies, our information technology systems face the threat of cyber-attacks, such as security breaches, phishing scams, malware and denial-of-service attacks. Our systems or the systems of third-parties that we use could experience unauthorized intrusions or inadvertent data breaches, which could result in the exposure or erosion of our proprietary information and/or members’ data. This data is maintained on our own systems as well as the systems of third-party service providers.

As methods used to obtain unauthorized access to systems or sabotage systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us or the third parties on which we rely, we and our partners may be unable to anticipate these attacks or implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, any party who illegally obtains identification and password credentials could potentially gain unauthorized access to our systems or the systems of

third parties on which we rely. If any such event occurs, we may have to spend significant capital and other resources to mitigate the impact of the event and to develop and implement protection to prevent such future events of that nature from occurring.

From time to time, employees make mistakes with respect to security policies that are not always immediately detected by compliance policies and procedures. These can include errors in software implementation or a failure to follow protocols and patch systems. Employee errors, even if promptly discovered and remediated, may disrupt operations or result in unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.

If a cybersecurity incident occurs, or is perceived to occur, we may be the subject of negative publicity and the perception of the effectiveness of our security measures and our reputation may be harmed. This could damage our relationships and result in the loss of existing or potential members. In addition, even if no compromise of member information occurs, we could incur significant fines or lose the opportunity to support electronic payments from members, which would limit the full effectiveness and efficiency of our payment processing.

The wide variety of payment methods that we accept subjects us to third-party payment processing-related risks.

We accept a variety of payment methods including WeChat Pay and Alipay through third-party payment processors. We pay these payment processors varying service fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs. We may also be subject to fraud, security breaches and other illegal activities in connection with the payment methods we offer.

We are subject to various rules, regulations and requirements, regulatory or otherwise, governing payment processing, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply with. For example, according to Announcement No.10 (2018) of the People’s Bank of China issued in July 2018, or Announcement No.10, companies that refuse to accept cash payment should rectify such non-compliance. According to People’s Bank of China’s interpretation of Announcement No.10, e-commence platforms, self-service counters and other companies:

•        that offer products and services online and in a cashier-less manner,

•        whose entire customer purchase process does not involve payment or receipt of cash, and

•        who have obtained consent from customers to use electronic payment methods, may use electronic payment methods instead of accepting cash.

We believe that our cashier-less operation complies with Announcement No. 10. However, governmental authorities may not have the same interpretation. If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees or no longer be able to offer certain payment methods, materially adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience significant complaints from members, or adverse publicity involving our spaces and services.

We face an inherent risk of complaints from our members. Most of the complaints from our members related to the facilities and services of our spaces. We take these complaints seriously and endeavor to reduce these complaints by implementing various remedial measures. Nevertheless, we may not successfully prevent or address all complaints.

Any complaints or claims against us, even if meritless and unsuccessful, may divert management attention and other resources from our business and adversely affect our business. Members may lose confidence in us and our brand, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, negative publicity including but not limited to negative online reviews on social media and crowd-sourced review platforms, industry findings or media reports related to agile office spaces industry, whether or not accurate, and whether or not concerning our spaces, can adversely affect our business, results of operations and reputation.

Pending or future litigation could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to lawsuits from our competitors, individuals, or other entities against us, in matters relating to intellectual property rights and contractual disputes. The outcomes of actions we institute may not be successful or favorable to us. Lawsuits against us may also generate negative publicity that significantly harms our reputation, which may adversely affect our ability to expand our member base. In addition to the related cost, managing and defending litigation and related indemnity obligations can significantly divert management’s attention from operating our business. We may also need to pay damages or settle lawsuits with a substantial amount of cash.

As a publicly listed company, we may face additional exposure to claims and lawsuits. These claims could divert management time and attention away from our business and result in significant costs to investigate and defend, regardless of the merits of the claims. In some instances, we may elect or be forced to pay substantial damages if we are unsuccessful in our efforts to defend against these claims, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Share-based compensation may have an impact on our future profit. Exercise of the share options granted will increase the number of our shares, which may affect the market price of our shares.

We adopted share incentive plans in August 2019 and November 2020, which we respectively refer to as 2019 Plan and 2020 Plan in this prospectus, to enhance our ability to attract and retain qualified individuals and align their interests with our growth and performance. The maximum aggregate numbers of ordinary shares we are authorized to issue pursuant to all awards under 2019 Plan are 15,028,567 ordinary shares.

In November 2020, we adopted the 2020 Plan, under which we are authorized to issue a maximum number of 7,188,661 Class A ordinary shares. As of the date of this prospectus, we have granted awards to purchase 6,926,191 Class A ordinary shares to replace the granted and outstanding awards under 2019 Plan.

We believe the granting of share-based awards helps us attract and retain key personnel and employees, and we expect to grant share-based compensation to employees in the future. As a result, our expenses associated with share-based compensation may increase, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

A severe or prolonged downturn in the PRC or global economy could materially adversely affect our business and our financial condition.

The global macroeconomic environment is facing challenges. Uncertainties remain over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies of the central banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and China. Unrest and terrorist threats in the Middle East, Europe and Africa and conflicts involving Ukraine, Syria and North Korea have also raised concerns. These concerns relate to regional instability and tension, as well as the relationship among China and other Asian countries, which may result in or intensify potential conflicts in relation to territorial disputes, and the trade disputes between the United States and China.

For example, a growing trade dispute between the United States and China could adversely impact demand for our agile office spaces and services, our costs, our members, suppliers and business partners and China’s economy, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. It is unclear whether these challenges and uncertainties will be contained or resolved, and what effects they may have on the global political and economic conditions in the long term.

Economic conditions in China are sensitive to global economic conditions, changes in domestic economic and political policies and the expected or perceived overall economic growth rate in China. While the economy in China has grown significantly over the past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy, and the rate of growth has been slowing in recent years. Although growth of China’s economy remained relatively stable, China’s economic growth may materially decline in the near future. Any severe or prolonged slowdown in the global or PRC economy may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we fail to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls to remediate our material weaknesses over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of the ordinary shares may be materially adversely affected.

In connection with our attempted initial public offering, we previously engaged Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP (“Deloitte”) to audit our combined and consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018. In January 2020, Deloitte informed our Board of Directors that Deloitte became aware of certain contractual arrangements regarding shareholder transactions of us which were not previously provided to Deloitte. Deloitte raised concerns over the impact of these contracts on the subsequent event footnote to the combined and consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, which omitted disclosures related to the contractual arrangements as well as our internal control over financial reporting.

In response to the issues raised by Deloitte, our Board of Directors commenced an investigation (the “Internal Investigation”) of such issues with assistance from external legal advisors. On July 22, 2020, our Board of Directors concluded the Internal Investigation. The material weaknesses identified during the Internal Investigation included:

•        The lack of an Audit & Risk Committee and Chief Compliance officer to monitor all company policies, and ensure that the policies are implemented and followed;

•        A lack of financial compliance training related to the disclosure obligations by shareholders, directors and officers during an US IPO to the our management personnel as well as other staff;

•        A failure to strictly implement our internal contract initiation and approval procedures to prohibit any unusual bypassing conduct of such procedures and improve employee’s awareness of such procedures by distributing relevant policies and delivering training;

•        A lack of proper contract approval procedures and policies, in which all related party transactions or above a certain amount must be reviewed;

•        A lack of internal file management procedures and lack of a more effective file records management system;

•        A lack of effective chop usage registration records with identifiable contract information, and lack of a parallel searchable chop usage registration records management system; and

•        A lack of compliance policies related to conflict of interest, related party transactions, ethics, and related matters.

As defined in the standards established by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We have implemented relevant remedy measures and all above material weaknesses are assessed to be remediated by December 31, 2020. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Change in Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

In connection with the audits of its combined and consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm has not conducted an audit of our internal control over financial reporting. The material weaknesses that have been identified relate to:

•        A lack of comprehensive accounting policies and procedures manual in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and

•        Insufficient accounting personnel with appropriate experience and knowledge to address complex accounting matters in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

To remedy the identified material weaknesses, we have adopted and plan to adopt further measures to improve our internal control over financial reporting. We have implemented, and plan to develop, a full set of U.S. GAAP accounting policies and financial reporting procedures as well as related internal control policies, including implementing a comprehensive accounting manual to guide the day-to-day accounting operation and reporting work.

We have recruited staff with knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC regulations in our finance and accounting department. We have also supplemented and enhanced internal training and development programs for financial reporting personnel. When entering into complex transactions, we plan to utilize third party consultant for accounting services as additional resources. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” However, we cannot assure you that these measures may fully address the material weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting or that we may conclude that they have been fully remediated.

We have become a public company and are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, requires that we include a report from management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F beginning with our annual report in our second annual report on Form 20-F after becoming a public company. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company” as such term is defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us. After we become a public company, our reporting obligations may significantly strain our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation.

In documenting and testing our internal control procedures, to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, we may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended, we may not conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404.

Our failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could result in material misstatements in our financial statements and impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis. As a result, our businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ordinary shares, may be materially adversely affected. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from Nasdaq, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.

As a recently public company, we expect to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we have increased the number of independent directors and adopted policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. Operating as a public company will make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage.

In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. It may also be more difficult for us to find qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers. After we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we may incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC.

If the interpretations, estimates or judgments used to prepare our financial statements are incorrect, we may restate our financial results, which could materially adversely affect us.

We are subject to complex securities laws and regulations and accounting principles and interpretations. In preparing our financial statements, we must interpret accounting principles and guidance and make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements, as well as the reported expenses incurred during the reporting periods. We base our interpretations, estimates and judgments on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for the preparation of our financial statements.

Generally accepted accounting principles are subject to interpretation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and other bodies that create and interpret accounting principles and guidance. If any of these bodies disagrees with our accounting recognition, measurement or disclosure or our accounting interpretations, estimates or assumptions, this may significantly affect our reported results and may retroactively affect previously reported results.

In connection with its initial public offering, our predecessor company, Orisun Acquisition Corp. (“Orisun”), a special purpose acquisition company, issued 4,440,024 public warrants (the “Public Warrants”), 233,201 private placement warrants (the “Private Warrants”), and 333,002 warrants underlying a unit purchase option issued to the representative of the underwriters in the initial public offering (the “Representative Warrants,” and together with the Public Warrants and Private Warrants, the “Orisun Warrants”). For a description of the Orisun Warrants, please refer to (i) the prospectus filed in connection with Orisun’s initial public offering on August 5, 2021 (File No. 333-232356) and (ii) the proxy statement filed in connection with the Business Combination on November 5, 2020 (File No. 333- 248191) (the “Proxy Statement”).

Orisun originally classified the Orisun Warrants as equity in its (i) audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2020, and (ii) unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the six months then ended, and the related notes included in the Proxy Statement.

On April 12, 2021, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC Staff”) released the Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (the “Statement”). In the Statement, SEC Staff indicated that certain contractual provisions in many special purpose acquisition company warrant agreements may result in such warrants needing to be classified as a liability rather than as equity.

We have reviewed the Statement and the Orisun Warrants with our independent auditors and management has concluded that the Private Warrants should be classified as liabilities measured at fair value, which will result in noncash gains or losses from changes in fair value reported each period in earnings. Additional guidance or new regulations or accounting principles and interpretations could be released that would require us to reclassify the Public Warrants and Representative Warrants as liabilities measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported each period in earnings and/or require a restatement of our financial statements with respect to treatment of the Public Warrants and Representative Warrants.

Any restatement of our financial results could, among other potential adverse effects:

•        result in us incurring substantial costs;

•        affect our ability to timely file our periodic reports or registration statements for securities until the restatement is completed;

•        divert the attention of our management and employees from managing our business;

•        result in material changes to our historical and future financial results;

•        result in investors losing confidence in our operating results;

•        subject us to securities class action litigation; and

•        cause our share price to decline.

We have limited insurance coverage for our operations.

The insurance industry in China remains at an early stage of development, and insurance companies in China currently offer limited business-related insurance products. Although we have purchased insurances including business disruption insurance and property insurance for our space, those insurances might not be able to cover all risks. Any uninsured risks may result in substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure

We rely on contractual arrangements with our VIEs and their shareholders for a large portion of our operations. These arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control. Any failure by our VIEs or their shareholders to perform their obligations under these contractual arrangements would materially adversely affect our business.

We rely on contractual arrangements with our VIEs and their shareholders to operate our business in China. The revenues contributed by our VIEs and their subsidiaries constituted substantially all of our net revenue for 2018, 2019 and 2020.

These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with control over our VIEs. For example, our VIEs and their shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct their operations in an acceptable manner or taking other actions detrimental to our interests. If we had direct ownership of our VIEs, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of directors of our VIEs, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational level.

However, under our contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance by our VIEs and their shareholders of their obligations under the contracts to exercise control over our VIEs. The shareholders of our consolidated VIEs may not act in the best interests of our company or may not perform their obligations under these contracts. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate certain portions of our business through the contractual arrangements with our VIEs. One of our VIEs, Ucommune Venture, has 45 shareholders. As a result, we face increased risk that these shareholders may breach the VIE contracts or take other actions detrimental to our interests.

If our VIEs or their shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. If the shareholders of our VIEs refuse to transfer their equity interest in our VIEs to us or our designee if we exercise the purchase option pursuant to these contractual arrangements, or if they otherwise act in bad faith, then we may have to take legal actions to compel them to perform their contractual obligations.

If any third parties claim any interest in such shareholders’ equity interests in our VIEs, our ability to exercise shareholders’ rights or foreclose the share pledge according to the contractual arrangements may be impaired. If these or other disputes between the shareholders of our VIEs and third parties were to impair our control over our VIEs, our ability to consolidate the financial results of our VIEs would be affected, which would in turn materially adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition.

The shareholders of our VIEs may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We are not aware any conflicts between the shareholders of our VIEs and us. However, the shareholders of our VIEs may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us in the future. These shareholders may refuse to sign or breach, or cause our VIEs to breach, or refuse to renew, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and our VIEs, which would materially adversely affect our ability to effectively control our VIEs and receive economic

benefits from it. For example, the shareholders could cause our agreements with our VIEs to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis.

We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor, particularly given the relatively large number of shareholders that Ucommune Venture has. We do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and these shareholders, we would rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

Our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law. These contracts are interpreted in accordance with PRC law, and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures.

The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Meanwhile, very few precedents and little formal guidance exist as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a VIE should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary.

Under PRC law, rulings by arbitrators are final, parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts except that parties may apply for a cancellation of such rulings before an intermediate people’s court at the place where the arbitration commission is located under certain circumstances. If the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts, which would require additional expenses and delay. If we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delays or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may exert effective control over our VIEs, negatively affecting our ability to conduct our business.

Substantial uncertainties in the PRC foreign investment legal regime may significantly impact our corporate structure and operations.

On March 15, 2019, the PRC National People’s Congress adopted the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect as of January 1, 2020 and replaced the existing laws regulating foreign investment in the PRC: the Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-Foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-Invested Enterprise Law. As a result, the Foreign Investment law became the legal foundation for foreign investment in the PRC. The Implementation Regulation of the Foreign Investment Law came into effect as of January 1, 2020, which clarified and elaborated the relevant provisions of the Foreign Investment Law.

The Foreign Investment Law stipulates three forms of foreign investment. However, the Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly stipulate the contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. The Foreign Investment Law stipulates that foreign investment includes “foreign investors invest through any other methods under laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council”.

Future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council may regard contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, and whether our contractual arrangement will be recognized as foreign investment, whether our contractual arrangement will be deemed to be in violation of the foreign investment access requirements and how the above-mentioned contractual arrangement will be handled are uncertain. We may ultimately need to unwind the contractual arrangements and/or dispose of the VIEs or their subsidiaries, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Contractual arrangements in relation to our VIEs may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or our VIEs owe additional taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the value of your investment.

Under PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities within ten years after the taxable year when the transactions are conducted. We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the VIE contractual

arrangements were not entered into on an arm’s-length basis. This could result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust the income of our VIEs in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment.

A transfer pricing adjustment could result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by our VIEs for PRC tax purposes, which could in turn increase their tax liabilities without reducing our PRC subsidiaries’ tax expenses. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on our VIEs for the adjusted but unpaid taxes under applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially adversely affected if the tax liabilities of our VIEs increase or if they are required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.

We may lose the ability to use, or otherwise benefit from, the licenses, approvals and assets held by our VIEs, which could severely disrupt our business, render us unable to conduct some or all of our business and constrain our growth.

We rely on contractual arrangements with our VIEs to use, or otherwise benefit from, certain foreign restricted licenses and permits that we need or may need in the future as our business continues to expand, such as the internet content provider license, or the ICP license held by one of our VIEs.

The contractual arrangements contain terms that obligate the VIEs’ shareholders to ensure the valid existence of the VIEs and restrict the disposal of material assets of the VIEs. If the VIEs’ shareholders breach these contractual arrangements and voluntarily liquidate our VIEs, or our VIEs declare bankruptcy and all or part of their assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, or are otherwise disposed of without our consent, we may be unable to conduct some or all of our business or otherwise benefit from the assets held by the VIEs.

If our VIEs undergo a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, their shareholders or unrelated third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of the assets of the VIEs, hindering our ability to operate our business and constrain our growth. The foregoing risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights may adversely affect the value and liquidity of the ordinary shares.

We cannot predict whether our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will result in a lower or more volatile market price of the ordinary shares, in adverse publicity, or other adverse consequences. Certain index providers have announced restrictions on including companies with multiple-class share structures in certain of their indices. For example, in July 2017, FTSE Russell announced that it plans to require new constituents of its indices to have greater than 5% of the company’s voting rights in the hands of public stockholders, and S&P Dow Jones announced that it will no longer admit companies with multiple-class share structures to certain of its indices.

In 2017, MSCI, a leading stock index provider, opened public consultations on their treatment of no-vote and multi-class structures and temporarily barred new multi-class listings from certain of its indices. In October 2018, MSCI announced its decision to include equity securities “with unequal voting structures” in its indices and to launch a new index that specifically includes voting rights in its eligibility criteria. Because of our dual-class structure, we will likely be excluded from these indices and other stock indices that take similar actions.

Given the sustained flow of investment funds into passive strategies that seek to track certain indices, exclusion from certain stock indices would likely preclude investment by many of these funds and could make our ordinary shares less attractive to investors. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures and our dual-class structure may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance, adversely affecting the market price and liquidity of the ordinary shares.

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares may view as beneficial.

We have adopted a dual-class share structure such that our ordinary shares consist of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. In respect of matters requiring the votes of shareholders, each Class A ordinary share is entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share is entitled to 15 votes. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof. Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances.

Certain of our existing shareholders have substantial influence over our company, and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other stockholders.

Dr. Daqing Mao, our founder, and his wife, Angela Bai, together hold approximately 64.7% of the voting power of our company due to our dual-class share structure. For more information, see “Principal Shareholders.” Dr. Mao is expected to retain significant influence over our business, including decisions regarding mergers, consolidations, liquidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions.

This concentration of ownership may also discourage, delay or prevent a future change of control, which could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and might reduce the price of our ordinary shares. Dr. Mao may pursue corporate opportunities independent of us, and the sale of his shares could constitute a change of control under our debt instruments.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act, Cap 22 (Law 3 of 1961, as consolidated and revised) of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by our minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands.

The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands have a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standings to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies such as ours have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records (except for our memorandum and articles of association, special resolutions which have been passed by our shareholders, our register of mortgages and charges, and a list of our current directors) or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

As a result, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by our management, users of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States. For a discussion of significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Act of the Cayman Islands and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders, see “Description of Share Capital and Warrants — Differences in Corporate Law.”

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We conduct most of our operations in China and substantially all of our operations outside of the United States. Most of our assets are located in China, and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, all our senior executive officers reside within China for a significant portion of the time and most are PRC nationals. Substantially all of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States.

As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States if your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers. For more information regarding the relevant laws of the Cayman Islands and China, see “Enforceability of Civil Liabilities.”

Risks Relating to Doing Business in China

Changes in China’s economic, political or social conditions or government policies could materially adversely affect our business.

Substantially all of our assets and operations are in China. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by political, economic and social conditions in China generally. The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the level of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, foreign exchange control and allocation of resources.

Although the Chinese government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets, and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, the government still owns a substantial portion of productive assets in China. In addition, the Chinese government plays a significant role in regulating industry development through industrial policies. The Chinese government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth by allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth over past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China, in the policies of the Chinese government or in the laws and regulations in China could materially adversely affect the overall economic growth of China. Such developments could adversely affect our business and operating results, reducing demand for our services and adversely affecting our competitive position.

The Chinese government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall Chinese economy, but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations.

In the past the Chinese government has implemented certain measures, including interest rate adjustments, to control the pace of economic growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activity in China, which may adversely affect our business and operating results. In addition, since many of our members are concentrated in major metropolitan areas, an economic downturn in any of these areas may materially adversely affect our business.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions under the civil law system may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value.

In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general. The overall effect of legislation since then has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, China has not developed a fully integrated legal system, and recently enacted laws and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in China.

The interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we obtain. These uncertainties may affect our judgment on the relevance of legal requirements and our ability to enforce our contractual rights or tort claims. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited or frivolous legal actions or threats in attempts to extract payments or benefits from us.

Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all and may have a retroactive effect. We may not be aware of our violation of any of these policies and rules until after the violation occurs. In addition, any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

Regulation and censorship of information disseminated over the internet in China may adversely affect our business and reputation and subject us to liability for information displayed on our website.

The PRC government has adopted regulations governing internet access and the distribution of news and other information over the internet. Under these regulations, internet content providers and internet publishers may not post or display over the internet content that, among other things, violates PRC laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of China, or is reactionary, obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or defamatory. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the revocation of licenses to provide internet content and other licenses, and the closure of the concerned websites or other internet platforms.

The website or platform operator may also be held liable for such censored information displayed on or linked to the websites or platforms. If our website or internet platform violates any such requirements, we may be penalized by relevant authorities, and our operations or reputation could be adversely affected.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate due to changes in political and economic conditions and the foreign exchange policy adopted by the PRC government. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar, and the Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably.

On November 30, 2015, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed the regular five-year review of the basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right, or the SDR, and decided that with effect from October 1, 2016, Renminbi is determined to be a freely usable currency and will be included in the SDR basket as a fifth currency, along with the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Renminbi depreciated significantly in the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and persistent capital outflows of China. Since then, the RMB has appreciated against the U.S. dollar, particularly in 2020.

With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system and the Renminbi may appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces, international relations especially the trade tensions between U.S. and China, or government policies of PRC or U.S. may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar.

A significant majority of our net revenue and costs are denominated in Renminbi. We are a holding company and we rely on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China for our cash needs. Any significant revaluation of Renminbi may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial position reported in Renminbi when translated into U.S. dollars, and the value of, and any dividends payable on in U.S. dollars.

To the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we would receive. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars to make payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would negatively affect the U.S. dollar amount.

Any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to our business may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In accordance with the laws and regulations in jurisdictions in which we operate, we must maintain various approvals, licenses and permits to operate our business, including but not limited to business license, fire prevention as-built acceptance check and filing for our spaces, and value-added telecommunications license and other approvals, licenses and permits for the operation of our online platform. These approvals, licenses and permits require satisfactory compliance with, among other things, the applicable laws and regulations.

If we fail to obtain the necessary licenses, permits and approvals, we may be subject to fines, confiscation of revenues generated from incompliance operations or the suspension of relevant operations. We may also experience adverse publicity arising from such non-compliance with government regulations that negatively impact our brand. We may experience difficulties or failures in obtaining the necessary approvals, licenses and permits for new spaces or new service offerings.

If we fail to obtain the material licenses, our expansion plans may be delayed. In addition, we may not obtain, renew and/or convert all of the approvals, licenses and permits required for our existing business upon their expiration in a timely manner or at all, which could adversely affect our operations.

A small number of spaces under of our self-operated model have not completed the required as-built acceptance check on fire prevention or fire safety filing. Our spaces that fail to complete such as-built acceptance check on fire prevention as required by relevant laws and regulations may be ordered by the relevant government authorities to cease business. As a result, we may be subject to fines ranging from RMB30,000 to RMB300,000 per space, and our spaces that fail to complete such fire safety filing as required may be subject to fines of up to RMB5,000 per space.

Based on relevant laws and regulations and our consultation with relevant government authorities, and as advised by our PRC counsel, the maximum amount of potential fines arising from the incompletion of the required as-built acceptance check on fire prevention and fire safety filing is approximately RMB0.6 million, as of the date of this prospectus. However, we have not received any material fines or penalties for such non-compliance.

We have taken several steps to strengthen our management over fire prevention or fire safety, including:

•        consulting with local regulatory authorities for completing the required as built acceptance checks on fire prevention or fire safety filings;

•        equipping the relevant spaces with proper fire safety facilities, equipment and safety signs;

•        engaging several fire safety consulting institutions to conduct fire safety inspection on the fire safety equipment and system of the -relevant spaces; and

•        implementing our fire safety internal control policy in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and providing fire safety related training to our employees.

The custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible assets, including stamps and seals, may fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets.

Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts, are executed using the stamps or seals of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with relevant PRC industry and commerce authorities. To secure the use of our stamps and seals, we have established internal control procedures and rules for using these stamps and seals.

When we use the stamps and seals, responsible personnel will apply through our office automation system and authorized employees will verify and approve the application in accordance with our internal control procedures and rules. In order to maintain the physical security of our stamps, we generally store them in secured locations accessible only to authorized employees.

Although we monitor such authorized employees, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. Our employees could abuse their authority by entering into a contract not approved by us or seeking to gain control of one of our subsidiaries or consolidated VIEs. If any employee obtains, misuses or misappropriates our stamps and seals or other controlling non-tangible assets, we could experience disruption to our operations, and we may have to take corporate or legal actions, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve and divert management from our operations.

Our operations depend on the performance of the mobile based systems, telecommunications networks and digital infrastructure in China.

Our operations rely heavily on mobile based systems, telecommunications networks and digital infrastructure. Almost all access to the internet in China is maintained through state-owned telecommunication operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. We primarily rely on a limited number of telecommunication service providers to provide data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines and internet data centers to host our servers.

We have limited access to alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s internet infrastructure or the fixed telecommunications networks provided by telecommunication service providers. With the expansion of our business, we may need to upgrade our technology and infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on our apps. The digital infrastructure and the telecommunications networks in China may not support the demands associated with the growth in digital usage.

In addition, we have no control over the costs of the services provided by telecommunication service providers. If the prices we pay for telecommunications and digital services rise significantly, our results of operations may be materially adversely affected. Furthermore, if data access fees or other charges to mobile members increase, our member traffic may decline and our business may be harmed.

We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could materially adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

We are a Cayman Islands holding company and we rely principally on dividends and other distributions on equity from our PRC subsidiaries for our cash requirements, including for services of any debt we may incur.

Our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends is based upon its distributable earnings. PRC regulations permit a PRC subsidiary to pay dividends to its shareholders only out of its accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of our PRC subsidiaries and our VIEs is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of its registered capital.

Each of our PRC subsidiaries as a Foreign Invested Enterprise, or FIE, is also required to further set aside a portion of its after-tax profits to fund the employee welfare fund, although the amount to be set aside, if any, is determined at its discretion. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to distribute dividends or other payments to their shareholders could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

In addition, the Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules provide that a withholding tax rate of up to 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless otherwise exempted or reduced according to treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC resident enterprises are incorporated.

PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay us from using the proceeds of securities offerings, to make loans or additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which could materially adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Any funds we transfer to our PRC subsidiaries, either as shareholder loans or as an increase in registered capital, are subject to approval by or registration with relevant governmental authorities in China. According to the relevant PRC regulations on FIEs in China, capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries are subject to the approval of or filing with the MOFCOM or their respective local branches and registration with a local bank authorized by SAFE. In addition, any foreign loan procured by our PRC subsidiaries cannot exceed statutory limits and is required to be registered with SAFE or its respective local branches.

Any medium or long-term loan to be provided by us to our VIEs must be registered with the National Development and Reform Commission, or NDRC, and SAFE or its local branches. We may not complete such registrations on a timely basis, with respect to future capital contributions or foreign loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such registrations, our ability to use the proceeds of securities offering, and to capitalize our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

On March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, which took effect on June 1, 2015. SAFE Circular 19 launched a nationwide reform of the administration of the settlement of the foreign exchange capital of FIEs and allows FIEs to settle their foreign exchange capital at their discretion. However, SAFE Circular 19 prohibits FIEs from using the Renminbi funds converted from their foreign exchange capital for expenditures beyond their business scopes, providing entrusted loans or repaying loans between nonfinancial enterprises.

SAFE issued the Circular on Reforming and Regulating Policies on the Control over Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital Accounts, or SAFE Circular 16, effective in June 2016. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 16, enterprises registered in China may convert their foreign debts from foreign currency to Renminbi on a discretionary basis. SAFE Circular 16 provides an integrated standard for conversion of foreign exchange under capital account items (including but not limited to foreign currency capital and foreign debts) on a discretionary basis which applies to all enterprises registered in China.

SAFE Circular 16 reiterates the principle that Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital of a company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope or prohibited by PRC laws or regulations, while such converted Renminbi shall not be provided as loans to its non-affiliated entities. As this circular is relatively new, its interpretation and application and any other future foreign exchange related rules remain uncertain.

Violations of these Circulars could result in severe monetary or other penalties. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to use Renminbi converted from the net proceeds of securities offering, to fund the establishment of new entities in China by our VIEs, to invest in or acquire any other PRC companies through our PRC subsidiaries, or to establish new consolidated VIEs in China, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability to utilize our net revenue effectively and affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our net revenue in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, we, as a Cayman Islands holding company, primarily rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have.

Under PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval of SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Under existing exchange restrictions, without prior approval of SAFE, cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries in China may be used to pay dividends.

authorities. For example, we may be subject to a more stringent review and approval process with respect to our foreign exchange activities, such as remittance of dividends and foreign-currency-denominated borrowings, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

If we decide to acquire a PRC domestic company, we or the owners of such company, as the case may be, may not obtain the necessary approvals or complete the necessary filings and registrations required by the foreign exchange regulations. This may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and could adversely affect our business and prospects.

We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

On February 3, 2015, the State Administration of Taxation, or the SAT, issued the Public Notice Regarding Certain Corporate Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-Tax Resident Enterprises, or SAT Bulletin 7. SAT Bulletin 7 extends its tax jurisdiction to transactions involving the transfer of taxable assets through offshore transfer of a foreign intermediate holding company.

In addition, SAT Bulletin 7 has introduced safe harbors for internal group restructurings and the purchase and sale of equity through a public securities market. SAT Bulletin 7 also brings challenges to both foreign transferor and transferee (or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer) of taxable assets, as such persons need to determine whether their transactions are subject to these rules and whether any withholding obligation applies.

On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Bulletin 37, which came into effect on December 1, 2017. SAT Bulletin 37 further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of non-resident enterprise income tax.

Where a non-resident enterprise transfers taxable assets indirectly by disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, which is an Indirect Transfer, the non-resident enterprise as either transferor or transferee, or the PRC entity that directly owns the taxable assets, may report such Indirect Transfer to the relevant tax authority. Using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax.

As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who pays for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes currently at a rate of 10% for the transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise. Both the transferor and the transferee may be subject to penalties under PRC tax laws if the transferee fails to withhold the taxes and the transferor fails to pay the taxes.

We face uncertainties as to the reporting and other implications of certain past and future transactions where PRC taxable assets are involved, such as offshore restructuring, sale of the shares in our offshore subsidiaries and investments. Our company may be subject to filing obligations or taxed if our company is transferor in such transactions, and may be subject to withholding obligations if our company is transferee in such transactions, under SAT Bulletin 7 and/or SAT Bulletin 37.

For transfer of shares in our company by investors who are non-PRC resident enterprises, our PRC subsidiaries may be requested to assist in the filing under SAT Bulletin 7 and/or SAT Bulletin 37. As a result, we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with SAT Bulletin 7 and/or SAT Bulletin 37 or to request that the relevant transferors from whom we purchase taxable assets comply with these circulars, or establish that our company should not be taxed under these circulars, which may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Certain PRC regulations may make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, and some other regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and

acquisition activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex. The Anti-Monopoly Law of the PRC also requires that MOFCOM be notified in advance of any concentration of undertaking if certain thresholds are triggered.

In addition, the Circular of the General Office of the State Council on the Establishment of Security Review System for the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors that became effective in March 2011, and the Rules on Implementation of Security Review System for the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors issued by the Ministry of Commerce that became effective in September 2011 specify that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise “national security” concerns are subject to strict review by the MOFCOM. The rules prohibit any activities attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement.

We may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time consuming. Any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the Ministry of Commerce or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock incentive plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

In February 2012, SAFE promulgated the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly Listed Company, replacing rules promulgated in 2007. Pursuant to these rules, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year who participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company, subject to certain exceptions, are required to register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiaries of such overseas-listed company, and complete certain other procedures. In addition, an overseas-entrusted institution must handle matters in connection with the exercise or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and interests.

We and our executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year and who have been granted options are subject to these regulations. Failure to complete the SAFE registrations may subject them to fines and legal sanctions, and additional restrictions may limit their ability to exercise their stock options or remit proceeds gained from the sale of their stock into the PRC. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees under PRC law.

We may be subject to liability for placing advertisements with content that is deemed inappropriate or misleading under PRC laws.

PRC laws and regulations prohibit advertising companies from producing, distributing or publishing any advertisement with content that violates PRC laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of the PRC, involves designs of the PRC national flag, national emblem or national anthem or the music of the national anthem, is considered reactionary, obscene, superstitious or absurd, is fraudulent, or disparages similar products. We cannot assure you that all the content contained in our advertisements is true and accurate as required by, and complies in all respects with, these advertising laws and regulations especially given the uncertainty in the interpretation of these PRC laws and regulations.

The foregoing regulations include the Advertising Law of the People’s Republic of China and the Interim Measures for the Administration of Internet Advertising. If we violate applicable PRC advertising laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties and our reputation may be harmed, which may negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Under PRC advertising laws and regulations, we must monitor the advertising content shown on our platform to ensure that such content is true, accurate and in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, where special government review is required for specific types of advertisements prior to posting, such as

advertisements relating to pharmaceuticals, medical instruments, agrochemicals and veterinary pharmaceuticals, we must confirm that such review has been performed and approval has been obtained from competent governmental authority.

Violation of these laws and regulations may subject us to penalties, including fines, confiscation of our advertising income, orders to cease dissemination of the advertisements and orders to publish an announcement correcting the misleading information. In circumstances involving serious violations, PRC governmental authorities may force us to terminate our advertising operation or revoke our licenses.

Third parties provide us with a majority of the advertisements shown on our platform. Although we have implemented manual monitoring systems and made significant efforts to ensure that the advertisements shown on our platform are in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations, the content contained in such advertisements may not be true and accurate as required by the advertising laws and regulations.

Although we have not been subject to material penalties or administrative sanctions in the past for the advertisements shown on our platform, if we violate PRC advertising laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties and our reputation may be harmed, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We may also be subject to claims by customers misled by information on our apps, website or other portals on which we place our advertisements.

We may not recover our losses from advertisers by enforcing the indemnification provisions in the contracts, which may divert management’s time and other resources from our business to defend against these infringement claims. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our employment practices may be adversely impacted under the labor contract law of the PRC.

The PRC National People’s Congress promulgated the Labor Contract Law which became effective on January 1, 2008 and was amended on December 28, 2012, and the State Council promulgated implementing rules for the labor contract law on September 18, 2008. The labor contract law and the implementing rules impose requirements concerning, among others, the execution of written contracts between employers and employees, the time limits for probationary periods, and the length of employment contracts.

The interpretation and implementation of these regulations are evolving, our employment practices may violate the labor contract law and related regulations and we could be subject to penalties, fines or legal fees as a result. If we violate relevant laws and regulations, we may be subject to severe penalties or incur significant legal fees in connection with labor law disputes or investigations, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We may be subject to additional contributions of social insurance and housing fund and late payments and fines imposed by relevant governmental authorities.

PRC laws and regulations require us to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an employer has made adequate payments of the requisite statutory employee benefits, and employers who fail to make adequate payments may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties.

Under the Social Insurance Law and the Regulations on the Administration of Housing Fund, PRC subsidiaries shall register with local social insurance agencies and register with applicable housing fund management centers and establish a special housing fund account in an entrusted bank. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not made adequate contributions to the above employee benefits for some of our employees.

Government authorities could require us to pay the outstanding amount and impose late fees or fines on us. If we fail to make the outstanding social insurance and housing fund contributions within the prescribed time frame, we may be subject to fines and late payment fees, and our financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable PRC tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.

Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to the enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise.

In 2009, the SAT issued a circular, known as SAT Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular applies only to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the SAT’s general position on how “de facto management body” should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises.

According to SAT Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China, and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met:

•        the primary location of the day-to-day operational management is in the PRC;

•        decisions relating to the enterprise’s financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC;

•        the enterprise’s primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions are located or maintained in the PRC; and

•        at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC.

We believe our company is not a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If the PRC tax authorities determine that our company is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, we would be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on our worldwide income at the rate of 25%. Furthermore, we would be required to withhold a 10% tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises.

In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders may be subject to PRC tax on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares or ordinary shares, if such income is treated as sourced from within the PRC. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends paid to our non-PRC individual shareholders and any gain realized on the transfer of the ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20% (which, in the case of dividends, may be withheld at source by us).

These rates may be reduced by an applicable tax treaty, but it is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of our company would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ordinary shares.

The audit report included in this prospectus is prepared by an auditor who is not inspected by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, as such, you are deprived of the benefits of such inspection.

Our independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit reports included in our prospectus filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, as auditors of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or the PCAOB, is required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess its compliance with the laws of the United States and professional standards. Because our auditors are located in the Peoples’ Republic of China, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the Chinese authorities, our auditors are not currently inspected by the PCAOB.

On May 24, 2013, PCAOB announced that it had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Enforcement Cooperation with the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, and the Ministry of Finance which establishes a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations in the United States and China. PCAOB continues to be in discussions with the CSRC and the Ministry of Finance to permit joint inspections in the PRC of audit firms that are registered with PCAOB and audit Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges.

On December 7, 2018, the SEC and the PCAOB issued a joint statement highlighting continued challenges faced by the U.S. regulators in their oversight of financial statement audits of U.S.-listed companies with significant operations in China. The joint statement reflects a heightened interest in this issue.

On April 21, 2020, former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton and PCAOB Chairman William D. Duhnke III, along with other senior SEC staff, released a joint statement highlighting the risks associated with investing in companies based in or have substantial operations in emerging markets including China, reiterating past SEC and PCAOB statements on matters including the difficulties associated with inspecting accounting firms and audit work papers in China and higher risks of fraud in emerging markets and the difficulties of bringing and enforcing SEC, Department of Justice and other U.S. regulatory actions, including in instances of fraud, in emerging markets generally. However, it remains unclear what further actions the SEC and PCAOB will take to address these problems and its impact on Chinese companies listed in the U.S.

Inspections of other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. This lack of PCAOB inspections in China prevents the PCAOB from regularly evaluating our auditor’s audits and its quality control procedures. As a result, investors may be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB inspections.

The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to PCAOB inspections. Investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information and procedures and the quality of our financial statements. Additional remedial measures could be imposed on certain PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, in administrative proceedings instituted by the SEC, as a result of which our financial statements may be determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, if at all.

In December 2012, the SEC brought administrative proceedings against the PRC-based affiliates of the Big Four accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, alleging that they had violated U.S. securities laws by failing to provide audit work papers and other documents related to certain other PRC-based companies under investigation by the SEC. On January 22, 2014, an initial administrative law decision was issued, censuring and suspending these accounting firms from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months. The decision was neither final nor legally effective until reviewed and approved by the SEC, and on February 12, 2014, the PRC-based accounting firms appealed to the SEC against this decision.

In February 2015, each of the four PRC-based accounting firms agreed to a censure and to pay a fine to the SEC to settle the dispute and avoid suspension of their ability to practice before the SEC. The settlement requires the firms to follow detailed procedures to seek to provide the SEC with access to such firms’ audit documents via the CSRC. If the firms do not follow these procedures or if there is a failure in the process between the SEC and the CSRC, the SEC could impose penalties such as suspensions, or it could restart the administrative proceedings.

In the event that the SEC restarts the administrative proceedings, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the PRC, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about the proceedings against these audit firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding PRC-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of the ordinary shares may be adversely affected.

If our independent registered public accounting firm were denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC and we were unable to timely find another registered public accounting firm to audit and issue an opinion on our financial statements, our financial statements could fail to comply with the requirements of the

Exchange Act. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of our ordinary shares from the Nasdaq or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of the ordinary shares in the United States.

On June 4, 2020, the former U.S. President issued a memorandum ordering the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, or the PWG, to submit a report to the President within 60 days of the memorandum that includes recommendations for actions that can be taken by the executive branch and by the SEC or the PCAOB on Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges and their audit firms.

On August 6, 2020, the PWG released the report. In particular, with respect to jurisdictions that do not grant the PCAOB sufficient access to fulfill its statutory mandate, or NCJs, the PWG recommended that enhanced listing standards be applied to companies from NCJs for seeking initial listing and remaining listed on U.S. stock exchanges.

Under the enhanced listing standards, if the PCAOB does not have access to work papers of the principal audit firm located in a NCJ for the audit of a U.S.-listed company as a result of governmental restrictions, the U.S.-listed company may satisfy this standard by providing a co-audit from an audit firm with comparable resources and experience where the PCAOB determines that it has sufficient access to the firm’s audit work papers and practices to inspect the co-audit. The report recommended a transition period until January 1, 2022 before the new listing standards apply to companies already listed on U.S. stock exchanges.

Under the PWG recommendations, if we fail to meet the enhanced listing standards before January 1, 2022, we could face delisting from the Nasdaq Global Select Market, deregistration from the SEC and/or other risks, which may materially and adversely affect, or effectively terminate, our ordinary shares trading in the United States. Recent media reports covered the SEC’s proposed rulemaking in this regard. It is uncertain whether the PWG recommendations will be adopted, in whole or in part, and the impact of any new rule on us cannot be estimated at this time.

As part of a continued regulatory focus in the United States on access to audit and other information currently protected by national law, in particular China’s, in June 2019, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced bills in both houses of the U.S. Congress, which would require the SEC to maintain a list of issuers for which the PCAOB is not able to inspect or investigate auditor reports issued by foreign public accounting firms. The proposed Ensuring Quality Information and Transparency for Abroad-Based Listings on our Exchanges (EQUITABLE) Act prescribes increased disclosure requirements for these issuers and, beginning in 2025, the delisting from U.S. stock exchanges of issuers included on the SEC’s list for three consecutive years.

On May 20, 2020, the U.S. Senate passed S. 945, the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the Act. The Act was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives on December 2, 2020. Former President Trump signed the Act into law in December 2020.

The Act requires the SEC to prohibit foreign companies from listing securities on U.S. securities exchanges or trading “over-the-counter” if a company retains a foreign accounting firm that cannot be inspected by the PCAOB for three consecutive years, beginning in 2021. The enactment of Act and any additional rule making efforts to increase U.S. regulatory access to audit information in China could cause investor uncertainty for affected SEC registrants, including us, the market price of our ordinary shares could be materially adversely affected, and we could be delisted if we are unable to meet the PCAOB inspection requirement in time.

Risks Relating to Being a Public Company and Our Securities

Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on a price appreciation of the ordinary shares for a return on your investment.

We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in the ordinary shares as a source for any future dividend income.

A large, active trading market for our securities may not develop and the trading price for our securities may fluctuate significantly.

We cannot assure you that a liquid public market for the ordinary shares will develop. If a large, active public market for the ordinary shares does not develop, the market price and liquidity of the ordinary shares may be materially adversely affected. As a result, investors in our securities may experience a significant decrease in the value of the ordinary shares.

Warrants and UPOs are exercisable for our Class A ordinary shares, which may increase the number of ordinary shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our shareholders.

As of the date of this prospectus, there are outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 8,015,623 Class A ordinary shares at exercise prices, which warrants are immediately exercisable. As of the date of this prospectus, there are outstanding 333,002 UPOs exercisable for 333,002 Class A ordinary shares, 333,002 UPO Warrants to purchase an additional 166,501 Class A ordinary shares, and 333,002 UPO Rights to convert to an additional 33,300 Class A ordinary shares. To the extent such warrants or UPOs are exercised, additional Class A ordinary shares will be issued, which will result in dilution to our ordinary shareholders and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such warrants or UPOs may be exercised could adversely affect the market price of our Class A ordinary shares.

The trading prices of the ordinary shares and the warrants expiring on November 17, 2025 are likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

The trading prices of the ordinary shares the warrants expiring on November 17, 2025 are likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for the ordinary shares and the listed warrants may be highly volatile for factors specific to our own operations, including the following:

•        variations in our net revenue, earnings and cash flows;

•        announcements of new investments, acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint ventures by us or our competitors;

•        announcements of new offerings and expansions by us or our competitors;

•        changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

•        detrimental adverse publicity about us, our shareholders, affiliates, directors, officers or employees, our business model, our services or our industry;

•        announcements of new regulations, rules or policies relevant for our business;

•        additions or departures of key personnel;

•        release of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding equity securities or sales of additional equity securities; and

•        potential litigation or regulatory investigations.

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which the ordinary shares will trade.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations.

Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of ordinary shares could adversely affect their market price.

Sales of substantial amounts of the ordinary shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the ordinary shares and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings in the future. Shares held by our existing shareholders may also be sold in the public market in the future subject to the restrictions in Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the Securities Act and the applicable lockup agreements.

We have 77,937,707 Class A ordinary shares outstanding as of the date of this prospectus. In connection with our registered offering of Class A shares and New Warrants (the “February 2021 Follow-on and Warrants Offering”), we, our directors and executive officers and the holders of 10% or more of our outstanding Class A ordinary shares agreed with the underwriter, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell, transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any of Class A ordinary shares or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for the Class A ordinary shares for a period of 90 days after January 28, 2021. However, the underwriters may release these securities from these restrictions at any time.

We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of securities held by our significant shareholders or any other holders or the availability of these securities for future sale will have on the market price of the ordinary shares. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale” for a more detailed description of the restrictions on selling our securities.

In addition, certain holders of our existing shareholders are entitled to certain registration rights. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, would result in these shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration. Sales of these registered shares in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline.

Techniques employed by short sellers may drive down the market price of the ordinary shares.

Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale.

As it is in the short seller’s interest for the price of the security to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its prospects to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a security short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of shares in the market.

Public companies that have substantially all of their operations in China have been the subject of short selling. Much of the scrutiny and negative publicity has centered on allegations of a lack of effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result, many of these companies are now conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations and, in the interim, are subject to shareholder lawsuits and/or SEC enforcement actions.

It is not clear what effect such negative publicity could have on us. If we were to become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we could have to expend significant resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves.

While we would strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short seller by principles of freedom of speech, applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could be costly and time-consuming, and could distract our

management from growing our business. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven to be groundless, allegations against us could severely impact our business, and any investment in the ordinary shares could be greatly reduced or even rendered worthless.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price for the ordinary shares and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the ordinary shares will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If research analysts do not establish and maintain adequate research coverage or if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades the ordinary shares or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price for the ordinary shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which, in turn, could cause the market price or trading volume for the ordinary shares to decline.

Our management will have broad discretion over the use of any net proceeds from the exercise of Warrants and you may not agree with how we use the proceeds, and the proceeds may not be invested successfully.

Our management will have broad discretion as to the use of any net proceeds from the exercise of Warrants and could use them for purposes other than those contemplated as of the date of this prospectus and in ways that do not necessarily improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our ordinary shares. Accordingly, you will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of any proceeds from the exercise of Warrants on a cash basis and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. The proceeds could be invested in a way that does not yield a favorable, or any, return for you.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain anti-takeover provisions that could materially adversely affect the rights of holders of our ordinary shares.

We have adopted an amended and restated memorandum and articles of association that contains provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction.

Our Board of Directors has the authority, subject to any resolution of the shareholders to the contrary, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our ordinary shares. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our Board of Directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of our ordinary shares may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our ordinary shares may be materially adversely affected.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, most significantly, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as long as we remain an emerging growth company. As a result, if we elect not to comply with such auditor attestation requirements, our investors may not have access to certain information they may deem important.

insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be difficult for us to attract and retain qualified people to serve on our Board of Directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

There can be no assurance we will not be a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), for any taxable year, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of our ordinary shares or warrants.

In general, a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year in which (i) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income (including interest income) or (ii) 50% or more of the value of its assets (generally determined based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) is attributable to assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. For purposes of the above calculations, we will be treated as earning our proportionate share of the income of, and owning our proportionate share of the assets of, any other corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, 25% (by value) of the stock.

Based upon the manner in which we operate our business, the composition of our income and assets and the value of our assets, we do not believe we were a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31, 2020. However, the application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and we cannot assure you we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year. The value of our assets for purposes of the PFIC determination will generally be determined by reference to the market price of our ordinary shares, which could fluctuate significantly. In addition, our PFIC status depends on the manner we operate our workspace business (and the extent to which our income from workspace membership continues to qualify as active for PFIC purposes). Furthermore, it is not entirely clear how the contractual arrangements between us, our VIEs and their nominal shareholders are treated for purposes of the PFIC rules, and we may be or become a PFIC if our VIEs are not treated as owned by us. Because of these uncertainties, there can be no assurance we will not be a PFIC for the current taxable year, or will not be a PFIC in the future.

If we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined below) owns our ordinary shares or warrants, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to such U.S. Holder. See “Taxation — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Passive Foreign Investment Company.”

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing requirements and, as a result, will qualify for, and may rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. You will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

We are a “controlled company” as defined under the rules of the Nasdaq since Dr. Daqing Mao and his spouse, Angela Bai, beneficially own, when combined, more than 50% of our total voting power. As long as we remain a controlled company under this definition, we are permitted to elect to rely on certain exemptions from corporate governance rules, including:

•        an exemption from the rule that a majority of our Board of Directors must be independent directors;

•        an exemption from the rule that the compensation of our chief executive officer must be determined or recommended solely by independent directors; and

•        an exemption from the rule that our director nominees must be selected or recommended solely by independent directors.

Although we currently do not intend to rely on the “controlled company” exemptions under the Nasdaq listing rules, we could elect to rely on those exemptions in the future. As a result, you may not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to these corporate governance requirements.