Delaware
|
|
47-0945740
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12 (g) of the Act: None
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
x
|
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
o
|
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
o
|
|
PART I
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
||
Item 1A.
|
||
Item 1B.
|
||
Item 2.
|
||
Item 3.
|
||
Item 4.
|
||
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
||
Item 6.
|
||
Item 7.
|
||
Item 7A.
|
||
Item 8.
|
||
Item 9.
|
||
Item 9A.
|
||
Item 9B.
|
||
|
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
||
Item 11.
|
||
Item 12.
|
||
Item 13.
|
||
Item 14.
|
||
|
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
||
|
|
|
|
•
|
VizQL
—
Our breakthrough visual query language, VizQL, translates drag-and-drop actions into data queries and then expresses that information visually. VizQL unifies the formerly disparate tasks of query and visualization and allows users to transform questions into pictures without the need for software scripts, chart wizards or dialogue boxes that inhibit speed and flexibility. This capability is designed to enable a more intuitive, creative and engaging experience for our users. VizQL can deliver dramatic gains in people's ability to see and understand data, and we believe it represents a foundational advancement in the field of analytics.
|
•
|
Hybrid Data Architecture
—Our Hybrid Data Architecture combines the power and flexibility of our Live Query and In-Memory Data Engines. Our Live Query Engine allows users to instantaneously connect to large volumes of data in its existing format and location, reducing the need for time-consuming data transformation processes that only technical specialists can perform. In addition, this capability allows customers to leverage investments in their existing data platforms and to capitalize on the capabilities of high performance databases. Our In-Memory Data Engine enables users to import large amounts of data into our own in-memory database. Using advanced algorithms and data compression techniques, our in-memory technology facilitates quick query responses on up to hundreds of millions of rows of data. Our Hybrid Data Architecture enables these data engines to work in harmony, allowing users the flexibility to access and analyze data from diverse sources and locations, while optimizing speed and performance for each source.
|
•
|
Expand our customer base
—We believe the market for analytics and business intelligence software is considerably underserved and, as a result, we have the opportunity to substantially expand our present base of over
39,000
customer accounts. We are expanding our online and offline marketing efforts to
|
•
|
Further penetrate our existing customer base
—Leveraging our land and expand business model, we intend to continue to increase adoption of our products within and across our existing customer base, as they expand the number of users and develop new use cases for our products. We believe there is an opportunity to extend the reach of our products within our customer base. Our sales and marketing strategy and focus on customer success help our customers identify and pursue new use cases within their organizations. As this expansion occurs, we believe that our products will also increasingly supplant incumbent legacy platforms to become the standard platform for analytics and business intelligence for our customers.
|
•
|
Grow internationally
—With approximately
25%
of our total revenues generated outside the United States and Canada in the
year ended December 31, 2015
, we believe there is significant opportunity to grow our international business. Our products currently support eight languages, and we are aggressively expanding our direct sales force and indirect sales channels outside the United States. We have international operations in Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Japan, Singapore and the United Kingdom, and we intend to invest in further expanding our footprint in these and other regions.
|
•
|
Relentlessly innovate and advance our products
—We have sought to rapidly improve the capabilities of our products over time and intend to continue to invest in product innovation and leadership. Building on our foundational technology innovations, including VizQL, we have released nine major versions of our software to date, rapidly expanding and improving our feature set and capabilities.
Our most recent major release, Tableau 9.0, offers advances in the areas of visual analytics, performance, scalability, data preparation and enterprise capabilities. Features include Automatic Data Preparation, Advanced Analytics, such as Level of Detail Expressions, and Smart Maps that are faster, more responsive and allow for geographic search. In addition, Tableau Server and Tableau Online have been re-designed to deliver a faster, more scalable and extensible platform for customers.
Since the release of Tableau 9.0, we released Tableau 9.1 which includes a new and improved mobile experience, more data connectors, new enterprise security and authentication options, and additional analytical functions for users. Shortly thereafter we released Tableau 9.2 which includes a new native app for the iPhone, more data preparation features and integration with Mapbox. We plan to continue to invest in research and development, including hiring top technical talent, focusing on core technology innovation and maintaining an agile organization that supports rapid release cycles. In particular, we intend to focus on further developing our cloud and mobile capabilities, expanding our advanced analytical and statistical functionality and continuing to expand the range of visualization formats and data sources and platforms we can address.
|
•
|
Extend our distribution channels and partner ecosystem
—We plan to continue investing in distribution channels, technology partners, and other strategic relationships to help us enter and grow in new markets while complementing our direct sales efforts. We are actively growing our indirect channels, particularly in international markets. Our most important technology partnerships are with market-leading database vendors, such as IBM, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation and Teradata Corporation, and emerging database vendors, such as Amazon.com, Inc., Cloudera, Inc., Google Inc., Pivotal GPDB and Vertica, with which we have collaborated to develop high performance and optimized connectivity to a broad group of popular data stores. We intend to continue to invest in partnerships that enable us to build and promote complementary capabilities that benefit our customers. We have also recently introduced application program interfaces ("APIs") to further empower our developer and OEM partner ecosystem to create applications that embed Tableau functionality.
|
•
|
Foster our passionate user community
—We benefit from a vibrant and engaged user community. We are investing in initiatives to further expand and energize this group, both online, through our online community site and through events such as our annual customer conferences, including our U.S. Tableau Customer Conference which has grown from approximately 180 attendees in 2008 to more than
10,000
customer and partner attendees in
2015
. In addition, Tableau Public, which we launched as a free cloud-based service, has a community of engaged users from media, government, non-profit and other organizations, who are passionate about sharing public data online. We intend to expand these efforts and to seek other means to evangelize our mission and facilitate sharing of best practices and success stories.
|
•
|
Treasure and cultivate our exceptional culture
—We believe our culture is a core ingredient of our success. Our employees share a passion for our mission, and our mission stands at the top of a list of eight core cultural values that govern our approach to our business. Our other core values include: teamwork; product leadership; using our own products; respect; honesty; simplicity; and commitment to delighting customers. Our values permeate our organization and drive our identity as a company. For example, we strive to paint virtually all aspects of our business with a brush of simplicity, including product user interfaces, pricing models, business processes and marketing strategies. Our culture is consistently cited in employee surveys as a key reason for their satisfaction with Tableau, and we have been publicly recognized as one of the best workplaces in the State of Washington.
|
•
|
Visual analytics
—Tableau Desktop empowers people to ask sophisticated questions by composing drag-and-drop pictures of their data. Tableau Desktop's easy-to-use interface is built on VizQL, which is capable of describing thousands of easily understood visual presentations of data including tables, maps, time series, dashboards and tables of graphs. The combination of a sophisticated language with a simple user interface means users can explore many different perspectives of their data. We believe being able to quickly view data from different perspectives inspires creative thinking and helps people find the right view to answer a question.
|
•
|
Analytical depth
—An important aspect of Tableau Desktop is its ability to marry powerful visualization with deep analytics. Users can filter and sort their data, create sophisticated calculations, drill into underlying information, define sets and cohorts, perform statistical analysis and derive correlations between diverse data sets with agility and relative ease. For example, with a few clicks, users can generate sophisticated forecasting models. This combination of simplicity and usefulness, ease of use and analytical depth, is what makes it possible for Tableau Desktop to empower a whole new group of people to become data analysts.
|
•
|
Data access
—Tableau Desktop lets people access and query a large number of common data sources, from traditional database systems like Oracle Corporation and SQL Server, to innovative new data stores like SAP HANA and Amazon Redshift, to Web applications like Salesforce and Google Analytics, to spreadsheets and files, to newly emerging data sources like Hadoop and NoSQL databases. Users can connect to these data sources with a few clicks, without any scripting or programming.
|
•
|
Live query
—Tableau Desktop translates users' interactions into live queries. As people use the drag-and-drop interface to examine information, they are automatically generating sophisticated queries against their database. Tableau Desktop can generate queries in a range of query languages including Structured Query Language ("SQL"), Multidimensional Expressions ("MDX"), and Salesforce Object Query Language ("SOQL"). Each query is optimized for the target platform and its unique performance and analytical characteristics. This live query approach allows customers to leverage their investments in database infrastructure and enables them to take advantage of query-optimized databases.
|
•
|
In-memory query
—Tableau Desktop contains an In-Memory Data Engine that can be used for rapid analysis. Many business users have data that is not stored in a database, and many databases are not
|
•
|
Data integration
—Many questions require combining data from multiple sources. Tableau Desktop provides a number of ways for people to combine data without requiring a typical data loading and transformation project. A Tableau workbook can connect to many different data sources, with each source independently leveraging either a live query or in-memory approach. Users can then combine the data in a single dashboard, visualization, filter or calculation using our data blending functionality. This approach can greatly extend the scope and depth of questions a person can answer.
|
•
|
Sharing and presentation
—Tableau Desktop allows users to author and distribute visualizations and dashboards with the ease expected of everyday office tools like spreadsheets. Content created in Tableau Desktop can be embedded in documents and presentations, or the workbooks can be distributed for viewing by people who have Tableau Desktop or Tableau Reader, a free product to view and interact with visualizations built in Tableau Desktop. Alternately, users can publish their workbooks to Tableau Server or Tableau Online enabling others in the organization to access them using a Web browser or a mobile device.
|
•
|
Shared content
—Tableau Server provides an easy-to-navigate repository of shared visualizations and dashboards within an organization. After users of Tableau Desktop create and publish their work to Tableau Server, any other user with appropriate security credentials can view and interact with it using a Web browser or mobile device. These viewers can also edit the work and republish it back to the server. The ability to publish dashboards and easily share impactful visual analysis increases awareness of business data and promotes improved decision-making. In addition, allowing others to interact with an analysis gives them deeper understanding of the information which leads to an improved grasp on the problem and hence greater confidence in the solution.
|
•
|
Shared data
—Just as Tableau Server is a platform for shared analysis, it is also a platform for shared data. Organizations can use Tableau Server to centrally manage enterprise data sources and metadata enabling knowledge sharing, efficiency, governance, data consistency and security. Business users or IT professionals can create rich data models, containing calculations, hierarchies, field aliases, sets and groups of interest, and publish them to Tableau Server to be shared across an organization. Others can use these models as a starting point for analysis while extending them to meet their own specific analytical needs. While centralized data models are not a pre-requisite for analysis in Tableau, they provide flexibility and increased productivity while maintaining control and security of data.
|
•
|
Universal access
—We have designed Tableau Server to enable seamless sharing of content across desktop, mobile and Web clients. Once users author and publish analytical content to the server, people across an organization can consume it on different browsers and devices. Further, Tableau Server automatically detects the device being used and adapts the content to take advantage of the device's capabilities including native touch experience, form factor and security. Tableau Server allows users to actively subscribe to content for automatic delivery on their devices or pull content on demand.
|
•
|
Integration
—Tableau Server offers APIs that help developers, customers and partners embed and control our software from portals, websites and other enterprise applications. Our APIs can also be used to construct in-memory databases, upload content and add users to the server programmatically. In addition to APIs, we also offer command line utilities to automate management tasks, and data upload tools to move data rapidly into Tableau Server.
|
•
|
Scalability
—Tableau Server's distributed multi-tier architecture allows it to scale to tens of thousands of users, across desktop, Web and mobile clients, meeting the needs of some of the largest organizations globally.
|
•
|
Security
—Tableau Server provides a robust security model that encompasses authentication, data and network security. Tableau Server is also built on a multi-tenant architecture that allows administrators to logically partition a single system across user populations, providing for separation of content.
|
•
|
Administration
—We believe the ease of administering a system is tremendously important to its adoption. While Tableau Server's management interface is designed to be simple enough for a line-of-business user, we also provide APIs to allow administrators to automate routine management processes. After the initial setup, many of our customers have reported that they spend little time on Tableau Server administration.
|
•
|
Hybrid data connectivity
—Tableau Online supports both live connectivity and in-memory extracts of cloud databases including Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery and Microsoft SQL Azure. Users can securely access real-time data from cloud data sources without requiring data snapshots.
|
•
|
On-premises data sync
—Tableau Online provides easy synching of on-premises data such as Microsoft Excel and Oracle to the cloud. This enables customers to keep their data fresh without compromising enterprise security.
|
•
|
Always up-to-date
—Tableau Online is always running the latest maintenance releases and versions of Tableau Server. Customers do not need to worry about upgrading their infrastructure or deploying the latest patches.
|
•
|
Reliable, scalable and secure
—Tableau Online is a SaaS analytics application built on the same enterprise-class architecture of Tableau Server.
|
•
|
Web scale
—Tableau Public meets the massive performance requirements of serving dynamic content on top tier websites including media channels, social media and other consumer internet services. Through a combination of proprietary software and optimized hardware we have designed a highly scalable, multi-tenant, online infrastructure that is based at a secure third party Web hosting facility. Our Tableau Public service has served over
600 million
views worldwide.
|
•
|
Social reach
—Anyone viewing or interacting with a Tableau Public visualization can share it on Facebook or Twitter. The ease of social sharing has facilitated greater conversations around data on Tableau Public.
|
•
|
Embedding
—Tableau Public views can be embedded in Web pages and blogs. Authors can enrich their websites and engage their audience with interactive visualizations based on Tableau Public.
|
•
|
Users
—Tableau Public has been used by over 150,000 people to make public data easy to see and understand. People have used the product to visualize and share data about government budgets, school
|
•
|
Extensibility and flexibility
—VizQL is a computer language for describing pictures of data, including tables, graphs, charts, maps, time series and tables of visualizations. VizQL unifies these different visual representations into a single framework. Conventional component architectures that underlie reporting packages and charting wizards contain a fixed number of computer procedures, one for each type of picture. VizQL, in contrast, is a language for creating pictures. Each type of picture is a different statement in the language. The extensibility and flexibility of VizQL makes it possible to create a virtually unlimited number of visualizations.
|
•
|
Transforms database records to graphical representations
—VizQL statements define the mapping from records returned from a database to graphical marks on a screen. Some fields in the record control the geometric properties of the mark, including position, size and orientation while other fields control visual attributes like color, transparency and shape.
|
•
|
Declarative language
—VizQL is a declarative language like other database languages, including SQL. The advantage of a declarative language is that the user describes what picture should be created, not how to make it. The user does not need to be aware of underlying implementation as query, analysis and rendering operations run behind the scenes. The result is a portable and more scalable system.
|
•
|
Defines and controls queries
—VizQL procedures define both the resulting picture and the database query. Our Live Query Engine generates efficient queries for external databases of many types from many vendors. VizQL also controls execution of our optimized In-Memory Data Engine to perform calculations in real time.
|
•
|
Optimized
—VizQL's interpreter is optimized for interactive use, enabling visualization and drawing of large data sets. VizQL is specifically designed to take advantage of modern computer graphics hardware, such as the fast rendering chips developed for gaming that are standard on personal computers.
|
•
|
Data consistency
—Copying data can cause people to work with out-of-date information. Further, each copy of the data may represent information at different times leading to inconsistency. With our Live Query Engine, customers do not need to create additional copies of their data.
|
•
|
Avoids data movement
—Moving and loading data is often time consuming and expensive. With Live Query Engine, our customers do not need to move data in order to use our products.
|
•
|
Scalability
—Many database vendors provide massively parallel implementations of databases that provide scalable data access to large data sets. These systems can scale in various ways including scaling the number of tables in the database, the number of records in each table, the number of columns in each record, the number of users and the number of active queries. These systems also provide powerful computation capabilities for very large data volumes. Our Live Query Engine allows businesses to leverage their investment in scalable data infrastructure.
|
•
|
Security
—Transferring data out of a database causes customers to lose the security and permissions models associated with that data. Using our Live Query Engine, customers can leverage the security and permissions models specified in their database systems.
|
•
|
Flexibility
—The database industry consists of multiple vendors with competitively differentiated products. Our Live Query Engine enables our customers to choose the appropriate technology for their business.
|
•
|
Lack of databases
—Much of the world's data is not stored in databases. For instance, data is commonly stored in text files, spreadsheets, logs or other formats.
|
•
|
Limited performance
—In addition, much of the world's data that is stored in databases resides in databases that are too slow for interactive analysis or reporting.
|
•
|
Column-based storage
—Our In-Memory Data Engine is based on a column-oriented format which is able to reduce input/output on analytical workloads. It employs a simple disk based representation of data that leverages the operating systems' management of virtual memory.
|
•
|
Compressed data representation
—Our technology utilizes compression aimed to keep the memory footprint as small as possible.
|
•
|
Optimization for in-memory analytics
—Our In-Memory Data Engine is optimized for analyzing data in random access memory ("RAM"). For example, leveraging RAM-based indices, our technology is more efficient than those using disk-based indices.
|
•
|
Architecture aware algorithms
—Our technology is designed to achieve high-throughput on modern processors. Key algorithms, such as grouping and aggregation, are designed to be cache and multi-core aware and adaptive to different hardware characteristics.
|
•
|
knowledge bases, forums and repositories that help users learn about topics of interest, ask questions and share insights;
|
•
|
groups, a mechanism that allows users to connect based on geographical location or industry affiliation;
|
•
|
ideas, an avenue to share product suggestions;
|
•
|
Viz Talk, designed to let users share and discuss interesting data visualizations;
|
•
|
blogs; and
|
•
|
news.
|
•
|
large technology companies, including suppliers of traditional business intelligence products and/or cloud-based offerings that provide one or more capabilities that are competitive with our products, such as Amazon.com, Inc., Google Inc., IBM, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation, Salesforce and SAP SE;
|
•
|
business analytics software companies, such as Qlik, MicroStrategy and TIBCO Spotfire (a subsidiary of TIBCO Software Inc.); and
|
•
|
SaaS-based products or cloud-based analytics providers.
|
•
|
hire, integrate, train and retain skilled talent, including members of our direct sales force and software engineers;
|
•
|
maintain and expand our business, including our operations and infrastructure to support our growth, both domestically and internationally;
|
•
|
compete with other companies, custom development efforts and open source initiatives that are currently in, or may in the future enter, the market for our software;
|
•
|
expand our customer base, both domestically and internationally;
|
•
|
renew maintenance agreements with, and sell additional products to, existing customers;
|
•
|
improve the performance and capabilities of our software;
|
•
|
maintain high customer satisfaction and ensure quality and timely releases of our products and product enhancements;
|
•
|
maintain, expand and support our indirect sales channels and strategic partner network;
|
•
|
maintain the quality of our website infrastructure to minimize latency when downloading or utilizing our software;
|
•
|
increase market awareness of our products and enhance our brand; and
|
•
|
maintain compliance with applicable governmental regulations and other legal obligations, including those related to intellectual property, international sales and taxation.
|
•
|
effectively recruit, integrate, train and motivate a large number of new employees, including our direct sales force, while retaining existing employees, maintaining the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture and effectively executing our business plan;
|
•
|
satisfy existing customers and attract new customers;
|
•
|
successfully introduce new products and enhancements;
|
•
|
continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls;
|
•
|
protect and further develop our strategic assets, including our intellectual property rights; and
|
•
|
make sound business decisions in light of the scrutiny associated with operating as a public company.
|
•
|
large technology companies, including suppliers of traditional business intelligence products and/or cloud-based offerings that provide one or more capabilities that are competitive with our products, such as Amazon.com, Inc., Google Inc., IBM, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation, Salesforce and SAP SE;
|
•
|
business analytics software companies, such as Qlik, MicroStrategy and TIBCO Spotfire (a subsidiary of TIBCO Software Inc.); and
|
•
|
SaaS-based products or cloud-based analytics providers.
|
•
|
the timing of satisfying revenue recognition criteria, particularly with regard to large transactions;
|
•
|
the expansion of our customer base;
|
•
|
the renewal of maintenance agreements with, and sales of additional products to, existing customers;
|
•
|
seasonal variations in our sales, which have generally historically been highest in the fourth quarter of a calendar year and lowest in the first quarter;
|
•
|
the size, timing and terms of our perpetual license sales to both existing and new customers;
|
•
|
the mix of direct sales versus sales through our indirect sales channels;
|
•
|
the introduction of products and product enhancements by existing competitors or new entrants into our market, and changes in pricing for products offered by us or our competitors;
|
•
|
customers delaying purchasing decisions in anticipation of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors or otherwise;
|
•
|
changes in customers' budgets;
|
•
|
customer acceptance of and willingness to pay for new versions of our products;
|
•
|
seasonal variations related to sales and marketing and other activities, such as expenses related to our annual customer conferences; and
|
•
|
general economic and political conditions, both domestically and internationally, as well as economic conditions specifically affecting industries in which our customers operate.
|
•
|
costs related to the hiring, training and maintenance of our direct sales force;
|
•
|
the timing and growth of our business, in particular through our hiring of new employees and international expansion;
|
•
|
our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses; and
|
•
|
fluctuations in our effective tax rate;
|
•
|
failure to predict market demand accurately in terms of software functionality and capability or to supply software that meets this demand in a timely fashion;
|
•
|
inability to operate effectively with the technologies, systems or applications of our existing or potential customers;
|
•
|
defects, errors or failures;
|
•
|
negative publicity about their performance or effectiveness;
|
•
|
delays in releasing our new software or enhancements to our existing software to the market;
|
•
|
the introduction or anticipated introduction of competing products by our competitors;
|
•
|
an ineffective sales force;
|
•
|
poor business conditions for our end-customers, causing them to delay purchases; and
|
•
|
the reluctance of customers to purchase software incorporating open source software.
|
•
|
increased management, travel, infrastructure, legal compliance and regulation costs associated with having multiple international operations;
|
•
|
management communication and integration problems resulting from geographic dispersion and language and cultural differences;
|
•
|
sales and customer service challenges associated with operating in different countries;
|
•
|
increased reliance on indirect sales channel partners outside the United States;
|
•
|
longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable or satisfying revenue recognition criteria, especially in emerging markets;
|
•
|
increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities;
|
•
|
general economic or political conditions in each country or region;
|
•
|
economic uncertainty around the world and adverse effects arising from economic interdependencies across countries and regions;
|
•
|
compliance with foreign laws and regulations and the risks and costs of non-compliance with such laws and regulations;
|
•
|
compliance with laws and regulations for foreign operations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, import and export control laws, tariffs, trade barriers, economic sanctions and other regulatory or contractual limitations on our ability to sell our software in certain foreign markets, and the risks and costs of non-compliance;
|
•
|
heightened risks of unfair or corrupt business practices in certain geographies and of improper or fraudulent sales arrangements that may impact financial results and result in restatements of financial statements and irregularities in financial statements;
|
•
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and related effects on our results of operations;
|
•
|
difficulties in transferring or, if we determine to do so, repatriating funds from or converting currencies in certain countries;
|
•
|
the need for localized software and licensing programs;
|
•
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in certain countries and practical difficulties and costs of enforcing rights abroad; and
|
•
|
compliance with the laws of numerous foreign taxing jurisdictions and overlapping of different tax regimes.
|
•
|
the efficacy of our marketing efforts;
|
•
|
our ability to continue to offer high-quality, innovative and error- and bug-free products;
|
•
|
our ability to retain existing customers and obtain new customers;
|
•
|
our ability to maintain high customer satisfaction;
|
•
|
the quality and perceived value of our products;
|
•
|
our ability to successfully differentiate our products from those of our competitors;
|
•
|
actions of our competitors and other third parties;
|
•
|
our ability to provide customer support and professional services;
|
•
|
any misuse or perceived misuse of our products;
|
•
|
positive or negative publicity;
|
•
|
interruptions, delays or attacks on our website; and
|
•
|
litigation- or regulatory-related developments.
|
•
|
changes in fiscal or contracting policies;
|
•
|
decreases in available government funding;
|
•
|
changes in government programs or applicable requirements;
|
•
|
the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations;
|
•
|
potential delays or changes in the government appropriations or other funding authorization processes;
|
•
|
governments and governmental agencies requiring contractual terms that are unfavorable to us, such as most-favored-nation pricing provisions; and
|
•
|
delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices.
|
•
|
an acquisition may negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows because it may require us to incur charges or assume substantial debt or other liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences or unfavorable accounting treatment, including potential write- downs of deferred revenues, may expose us to claims and disputes by third parties, including intellectual property claims and disputes, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset additional costs and expenses related to the acquisition;
|
•
|
we may encounter difficulties or unforeseen expenditures in integrating the business, technologies, products, personnel or operations of any company that we acquire, particularly if key personnel of the acquired company decide not to work for us;
|
•
|
an acquisition may disrupt our ongoing business, divert resources, increase our expenses and distract our management;
|
•
|
an acquisition may result in a delay or reduction of customer purchases for both us and the company we acquired due to customer uncertainty about continuity and effectiveness of service from either company;
|
•
|
we may encounter difficulties in, or may be unable to, successfully sell any acquired products;
|
•
|
an acquisition may involve the entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience or where competitors have stronger market positions;
|
•
|
challenges inherent in effectively managing an increased number of employees in diverse locations;
|
•
|
the potential strain on our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems and procedures;
|
•
|
potential known and unknown liabilities or deficiencies associated with an acquired company that were not identified in advance;
|
•
|
our use of cash to pay for acquisitions would limit other potential uses for our cash and affect our liquidity;
|
•
|
if we incur debt to fund such acquisitions, such debt may subject us to material restrictions on our ability to conduct our business as well as financial maintenance covenants;
|
•
|
the risk of impairment charges related to potential write-downs of acquired assets or goodwill in future acquisitions;
|
•
|
to the extent that we issue a significant amount of equity or convertible debt securities in connection with future acquisitions, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease; and
|
•
|
managing the varying intellectual property protection strategies and other activities of an acquired company.
|
•
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results of operations;
|
•
|
the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections;
|
•
|
failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our company, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;
|
•
|
ratings changes by any securities analysts who follow our company;
|
•
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
•
|
changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;
|
•
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole;
|
•
|
changes in our board of directors or management;
|
•
|
sales of large blocks of our common stock, including sales by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders;
|
•
|
lawsuits threatened or filed against us;
|
•
|
short sales, hedging and other derivative transactions involving our capital stock;
|
•
|
general economic conditions in the United States and abroad; and
|
•
|
other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.
|
•
|
establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board of directors are elected at one time;
|
•
|
permit the board of directors to establish the number of directors and fill any vacancies and newly-created directorships;
|
•
|
provide that directors may only be removed for cause;
|
•
|
require super-majority voting to amend some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws;
|
•
|
authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that our board of directors could use to implement a stockholder rights plan;
|
•
|
eliminate the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;
|
•
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
|
•
|
provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our bylaws; and
|
•
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at annual stockholder meetings.
|
|
Fiscal Year 2014
|
||||||
|
High
|
|
Low
|
||||
First Quarter
|
$
|
102.37
|
|
|
$
|
66.19
|
|
Second Quarter
|
82.10
|
|
|
52.02
|
|
||
Third Quarter
|
78.42
|
|
|
57.89
|
|
||
Fourth Quarter
|
89.95
|
|
|
62.15
|
|
||
|
Fiscal Year 2015
|
||||||
|
High
|
|
Low
|
||||
First Quarter
|
$
|
101.30
|
|
|
$
|
76.01
|
|
Second Quarter
|
123.98
|
|
|
89.50
|
|
||
Third Quarter
|
131.34
|
|
|
76.01
|
|
||
Fourth Quarter
|
104.92
|
|
|
78.28
|
|
Company/Index
|
Base Period 5/17/13
|
8/31/13
|
12/31/13
|
4/30/14
|
8/31/14
|
12/31/14
|
4/30/15
|
8/31/15
|
12/31/15
|
|||||||||
Tableau Software, Inc.
|
100.00
|
|
142.48
|
|
135.82
|
|
108.91
|
|
129.04
|
|
167.01
|
|
192.79
|
|
185.56
|
|
185.66
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
100.00
|
|
108.47
|
|
127.40
|
|
125.78
|
|
140.03
|
|
144.72
|
|
151.06
|
|
145.91
|
|
153.28
|
|
NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing Services
|
100.00
|
|
109.23
|
|
132.34
|
|
130.42
|
|
147.35
|
|
151.97
|
|
157.16
|
|
154.26
|
|
179.11
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
License
|
$
|
423,766
|
|
|
$
|
279,944
|
|
|
$
|
159,930
|
|
|
$
|
89,883
|
|
|
$
|
44,414
|
|
Maintenance and services
|
229,821
|
|
|
132,672
|
|
|
72,510
|
|
|
37,850
|
|
|
17,946
|
|
|||||
Total revenues
|
653,587
|
|
|
412,616
|
|
|
232,440
|
|
|
127,733
|
|
|
62,360
|
|
|||||
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
License
|
3,852
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
213
|
|
|||||
Maintenance and services
|
69,833
|
|
|
35,774
|
|
|
17,784
|
|
|
10,057
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|||||
Total cost of revenues
(1)
|
73,685
|
|
|
36,985
|
|
|
18,524
|
|
|
10,362
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|||||
Gross profit
|
579,902
|
|
|
375,631
|
|
|
213,916
|
|
|
117,371
|
|
|
59,347
|
|
|||||
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Sales and marketing
(1)
|
356,723
|
|
|
216,672
|
|
|
123,573
|
|
|
62,333
|
|
|
30,363
|
|
|||||
Research and development
(1)
|
204,131
|
|
|
110,923
|
|
|
60,769
|
|
|
33,065
|
|
|
18,387
|
|
|||||
General and administrative
(1)
|
71,078
|
|
|
41,712
|
|
|
25,905
|
|
|
17,715
|
|
|
6,679
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses
|
631,932
|
|
|
369,307
|
|
|
210,247
|
|
|
113,113
|
|
|
55,429
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss)
|
(52,030
|
)
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|||||
Other income (expense), net
|
1,223
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
(50,807
|
)
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
32,893
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
523
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
|
$
|
1,427
|
|
|
$
|
3,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
71,701
|
|
|
67,591
|
|
|
50,564
|
|
|
33,744
|
|
|
33,008
|
|
|||||
Diluted
|
71,701
|
|
|
74,319
|
|
|
59,092
|
|
|
39,652
|
|
|
39,431
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$
|
7,031
|
|
|
$
|
2,227
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
45,205
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
565
|
|
|||||
Research and development
|
55,269
|
|
|
20,794
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
628
|
|
|||||
General and administrative
|
11,963
|
|
|
5,794
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
795,900
|
|
|
$
|
680,613
|
|
|
$
|
252,674
|
|
|
$
|
39,302
|
|
|
$
|
30,223
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
72,350
|
|
|
45,627
|
|
|
21,338
|
|
|
10,346
|
|
|
5,564
|
|
|||||
Working capital
|
672,138
|
|
|
629,987
|
|
|
227,892
|
|
|
24,231
|
|
|
17,181
|
|
|||||
Total assets
|
1,030,711
|
|
|
865,662
|
|
|
354,927
|
|
|
86,992
|
|
|
51,277
|
|
|||||
Deferred revenue, including long-term portion
|
198,511
|
|
|
129,810
|
|
|
69,554
|
|
|
34,407
|
|
|
18,985
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities
|
296,766
|
|
|
193,656
|
|
|
110,267
|
|
|
57,018
|
|
|
31,523
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
733,945
|
|
|
672,006
|
|
|
244,660
|
|
|
9,943
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
•
|
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
|
•
|
the software or services have been delivered to the customer;
|
•
|
the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and
|
•
|
the collection of the related fees is probable.
|
•
|
whether such services are considered essential to the functionality of the software using factors such as the nature of the software products;
|
•
|
whether they are ready for use by the customer upon receipt;
|
•
|
the nature of the services, which typically do not involve significant customization to or development of the underlying software code;
|
•
|
the availability of services from other vendors;
|
•
|
whether the timing of payments for license revenues coincides with performance of services; and
|
•
|
whether milestones or acceptance criteria exist that affect the realizability of the software license fee.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
License
|
$
|
423,766
|
|
|
$
|
279,944
|
|
|
$
|
159,930
|
|
Maintenance and services
|
229,821
|
|
|
132,672
|
|
|
72,510
|
|
|||
Total revenues
|
653,587
|
|
|
412,616
|
|
|
232,440
|
|
|||
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
License
|
3,852
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
740
|
|
|||
Maintenance and services
|
69,833
|
|
|
35,774
|
|
|
17,784
|
|
|||
Total cost of revenues
(1)
|
73,685
|
|
|
36,985
|
|
|
18,524
|
|
|||
Gross profit
|
579,902
|
|
|
375,631
|
|
|
213,916
|
|
|||
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Sales and marketing
(1)
|
356,723
|
|
|
216,672
|
|
|
123,573
|
|
|||
Research and development
(1)
|
204,131
|
|
|
110,923
|
|
|
60,769
|
|
|||
General and administrative
(1)
|
71,078
|
|
|
41,712
|
|
|
25,905
|
|
|||
Total operating expenses
|
631,932
|
|
|
369,307
|
|
|
210,247
|
|
|||
Operating income (loss)
|
(52,030
|
)
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|||
Other income (expense), net
|
1,223
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|||
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
(50,807
|
)
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
32,893
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$
|
7,031
|
|
|
$
|
2,227
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
45,205
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|||
Research and development
|
55,269
|
|
|
20,794
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|||
General and administrative
|
11,963
|
|
|
5,794
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|||
|
(as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
License
|
64.8
|
%
|
|
67.8
|
%
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
Maintenance and services
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
Total revenues
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
License
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Maintenance and services
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
Total cost of revenues
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
88.7
|
%
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Sales and marketing
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
52.5
|
%
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
Research and development
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
96.7
|
%
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
90.5
|
%
|
Operating income (loss)
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
Net income (loss)
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2014 to 2015 % Change
|
|
2013 to 2014 % Change
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
License
|
$
|
423,766
|
|
|
$
|
279,944
|
|
|
$
|
159,930
|
|
|
51.4%
|
|
75.0%
|
Maintenance and services
|
229,821
|
|
|
132,672
|
|
|
72,510
|
|
|
73.2%
|
|
83.0%
|
|||
Total revenues
|
$
|
653,587
|
|
|
$
|
412,616
|
|
|
$
|
232,440
|
|
|
58.4%
|
|
77.5%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2014 to 2015 % Change
|
|
2013 to 2014 % Change
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
License
|
$
|
3,852
|
|
|
$
|
1,211
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
218.1%
|
|
63.6%
|
Maintenance and services
|
69,833
|
|
|
35,774
|
|
|
17,784
|
|
|
95.2%
|
|
101.2%
|
|||
Total cost of revenues
|
$
|
73,685
|
|
|
$
|
36,985
|
|
|
$
|
18,524
|
|
|
99.2%
|
|
99.7%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
||
License
|
99.1%
|
|
99.6%
|
|
99.5%
|
Maintenance and services
|
69.6%
|
|
73.0%
|
|
75.5%
|
Total gross margin
|
88.7%
|
|
91.0%
|
|
92.0%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2014 to 2015 % Change
|
|
2013 to 2014 % Change
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Sales and marketing
|
$
|
356,723
|
|
|
$
|
216,672
|
|
|
$
|
123,573
|
|
|
64.6%
|
|
75.3%
|
Research and development
|
204,131
|
|
|
110,923
|
|
|
60,769
|
|
|
84.0%
|
|
82.5%
|
|||
General and administrative
|
71,078
|
|
|
41,712
|
|
|
25,905
|
|
|
70.4%
|
|
61.0%
|
|||
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
631,932
|
|
|
$
|
369,307
|
|
|
$
|
210,247
|
|
|
71.1%
|
|
75.7%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Other income (expense), net
|
$
|
1,223
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
(804
|
)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
32,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
(4,211
|
)
|
Effective tax rate
|
(64.7
|
)%
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
(147.0
|
)%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Non-GAAP gross profit
|
$
|
586,933
|
|
|
$
|
377,858
|
|
|
$
|
214,389
|
|
Non-GAAP gross margin
|
89.8
|
%
|
|
91.6
|
%
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|||
Non-GAAP operating income
|
$
|
67,438
|
|
|
$
|
53,342
|
|
|
$
|
18,126
|
|
Non-GAAP operating margin
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|||
Non-GAAP net income
|
$
|
48,063
|
|
|
$
|
38,504
|
|
|
$
|
18,043
|
|
Free cash flow
|
$
|
91,644
|
|
|
$
|
52,703
|
|
|
$
|
20,118
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$
|
579,902
|
|
|
$
|
375,631
|
|
|
$
|
213,916
|
|
Excluding: Stock-based compensation expense attributable to cost of revenues
|
7,031
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
473
|
|
|||
Non-GAAP gross profit
|
$
|
586,933
|
|
|
$
|
377,858
|
|
|
$
|
214,389
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
Gross margin
|
88.7
|
%
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
Excluding: Stock-based compensation expense attributable to cost of revenues
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Non-GAAP gross margin
|
89.8
|
%
|
|
91.6
|
%
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
(52,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,324
|
|
|
$
|
3,669
|
|
Excluding: Stock-based compensation expense
|
119,468
|
|
|
47,018
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|||
Non-GAAP operating income
|
$
|
67,438
|
|
|
$
|
53,342
|
|
|
$
|
18,126
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
Operating margin
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Excluding: Stock-based compensation expense
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Non-GAAP operating margin
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
Excluding: Stock-based compensation expense
|
119,468
|
|
|
47,018
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|||
Income tax adjustment
(1)
|
12,295
|
|
|
(14,387
|
)
|
|
(3,490
|
)
|
|||
Non-GAAP net income
|
$
|
48,063
|
|
|
$
|
38,504
|
|
|
$
|
18,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average shares used to compute non-GAAP basic net income per share
|
71,701
|
|
|
67,591
|
|
|
50,564
|
|
|||
Effect of potentially dilutive shares: stock awards
|
5,970
|
|
|
6,728
|
|
|
8,528
|
|
|||
Weighted average shares used to compute non-GAAP diluted net income per share
|
77,671
|
|
|
74,319
|
|
|
59,092
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Non-GAAP net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
136,774
|
|
|
$
|
89,451
|
|
|
$
|
37,725
|
|
Less: Purchases of property and equipment
|
45,130
|
|
|
36,748
|
|
|
17,607
|
|
|||
Free cash flow
|
$
|
91,644
|
|
|
$
|
52,703
|
|
|
$
|
20,118
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
$
|
(46,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,607
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
$
|
25,746
|
|
|
$
|
374,289
|
|
|
$
|
193,221
|
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
795,900
|
|
|
$
|
680,613
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
136,774
|
|
|
$
|
89,451
|
|
|
$
|
37,725
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(46,130
|
)
|
|
(35,054
|
)
|
|
(17,607
|
)
|
|||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
25,746
|
|
|
374,289
|
|
|
193,221
|
|
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
33
|
|
|||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
115,287
|
|
|
$
|
427,939
|
|
|
$
|
213,372
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Operating Lease Obligations
|
$
|
443,503
|
|
|
$
|
22,957
|
|
|
$
|
74,366
|
|
|
$
|
87,005
|
|
|
$
|
259,175
|
|
Contractual Commitments
|
11,648
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
|
5,877
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
||||||
Assets
|
|
||||||
Current assets
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
795,900
|
|
|
$
|
680,613
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
131,784
|
|
|
99,910
|
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
16,977
|
|
|
10,777
|
|
||
Income taxes receivable
|
78
|
|
|
229
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
18,732
|
|
||
Total current assets
|
944,739
|
|
|
810,261
|
|
||
Property and equipment, net
|
72,350
|
|
|
45,627
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes
|
1,544
|
|
|
5,879
|
|
||
Deposits and other assets
|
12,078
|
|
|
3,895
|
|
||
Total assets
|
$
|
1,030,711
|
|
|
$
|
865,662
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
||||
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
Accounts payable
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,978
|
|
Accrued compensation and employee related benefits
|
53,003
|
|
|
40,164
|
|
||
Other accrued liabilities
|
31,838
|
|
|
15,769
|
|
||
Income taxes payable
|
1,000
|
|
|
378
|
|
||
Deferred revenue
|
185,608
|
|
|
121,985
|
|
||
Total current liabilities
|
272,601
|
|
|
180,274
|
|
||
Deferred revenue
|
12,903
|
|
|
7,825
|
|
||
Other long-term liabilities
|
11,262
|
|
|
5,557
|
|
||
Total liabilities
|
296,766
|
|
|
193,656
|
|
||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
||||
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized; 19,331,666 and 22,620,509 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
||
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized; 53,872,798 and 47,247,710 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
||
Additional paid-in capital
|
805,804
|
|
|
660,668
|
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
643
|
|
|
140
|
|
||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
(72,509
|
)
|
|
11,191
|
|
||
Total stockholders' equity
|
733,945
|
|
|
672,006
|
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
1,030,711
|
|
|
$
|
865,662
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
License
|
$
|
423,766
|
|
|
$
|
279,944
|
|
|
$
|
159,930
|
|
Maintenance and services
|
229,821
|
|
|
132,672
|
|
|
72,510
|
|
|||
Total revenues
|
653,587
|
|
|
412,616
|
|
|
232,440
|
|
|||
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
License
|
3,852
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
740
|
|
|||
Maintenance and services
|
69,833
|
|
|
35,774
|
|
|
17,784
|
|
|||
Total cost of revenues
(1)
|
73,685
|
|
|
36,985
|
|
|
18,524
|
|
|||
Gross profit
|
579,902
|
|
|
375,631
|
|
|
213,916
|
|
|||
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Sales and marketing
(1)
|
356,723
|
|
|
216,672
|
|
|
123,573
|
|
|||
Research and development
(1)
|
204,131
|
|
|
110,923
|
|
|
60,769
|
|
|||
General and administrative
(1)
|
71,078
|
|
|
41,712
|
|
|
25,905
|
|
|||
Total operating expenses
|
631,932
|
|
|
369,307
|
|
|
210,247
|
|
|||
Operating income (loss)
|
(52,030
|
)
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|||
Other income (expense), net
|
1,223
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|||
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
(50,807
|
)
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
32,893
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Basic
|
71,701
|
|
|
67,591
|
|
|
50,564
|
|
|||
Diluted
|
71,701
|
|
|
74,319
|
|
|
59,092
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$
|
7,031
|
|
|
$
|
2,227
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
45,205
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|||
Research and development
|
55,269
|
|
|
20,794
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|||
General and administrative
|
11,963
|
|
|
5,794
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Foreign currency translation, net
|
503
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|||
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,197
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,084
|
|
|
$
|
7,006
|
|
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
(Class A and B)
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated
Deficit)
|
|
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except share information)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2012
|
17,416,317
|
|
|
$
|
20,031
|
|
|
|
34,317,137
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
11,698
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,758
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,943
|
|
Proceeds from public offering, net of underwriters' discount
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,230,000
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
176,974
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
176,975
|
|
||||||
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock
|
(17,416,317
|
)
|
|
(20,031
|
)
|
|
|
17,416,317
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
20,030
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,031
|
|
||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,235,232
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
10,522
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,523
|
|
||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
||||||
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
||||||
Balances as of
December 31, 2013
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
62,198,686
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
239,406
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
5,318
|
|
|
244,660
|
|
||||||
Proceeds from public offering, net of underwriters' discount
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
344,077
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
344,077
|
|
||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,669,533
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
47,018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
47,018
|
|
||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,016
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,016
|
|
||||||
Other comprehensive income, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
211
|
|
||||||
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2014
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
69,868,219
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
660,668
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
11,191
|
|
|
672,006
|
|
||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,336,245
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,117
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,117
|
|
||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
119,468
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
119,468
|
|
||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,551
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,551
|
|
||||||
Other comprehensive income, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
503
|
|
||||||
Net loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
(83,700
|
)
|
||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2015
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
73,204,464
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
805,804
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
(72,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
733,945
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
23,667
|
|
|
13,512
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
119,468
|
|
|
47,018
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
(5,629
|
)
|
|
(14,061
|
)
|
|
(5,725
|
)
|
|||
Deferred income taxes
|
28,558
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
(3,052
|
)
|
|||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
(34,225
|
)
|
|
(41,015
|
)
|
|
(30,001
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets
|
(13,783
|
)
|
|
(6,950
|
)
|
|
(4,758
|
)
|
|||
Income taxes receivable
|
147
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|||
Deferred revenue
|
71,383
|
|
|
62,752
|
|
|
34,740
|
|
|||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
30,224
|
|
|
21,181
|
|
|
19,037
|
|
|||
Income taxes payable
|
664
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
62
|
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
136,774
|
|
|
89,451
|
|
|
37,725
|
|
|||
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(45,130
|
)
|
|
(36,748
|
)
|
|
(17,607
|
)
|
|||
Sales of property and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Other investing activities
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(46,130
|
)
|
|
(35,054
|
)
|
|
(17,607
|
)
|
|||
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Proceeds from public offering, net of underwriters' discount and offering costs
|
—
|
|
|
344,077
|
|
|
176,974
|
|
|||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
20,117
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
|
10,522
|
|
|||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
5,629
|
|
|
14,061
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
|||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
25,746
|
|
|
374,289
|
|
|
193,221
|
|
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
33
|
|
|||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
115,287
|
|
|
427,939
|
|
|
213,372
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Beginning of year
|
680,613
|
|
|
252,674
|
|
|
39,302
|
|
|||
End of year
|
$
|
795,900
|
|
|
$
|
680,613
|
|
|
$
|
252,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$
|
959
|
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
8
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
Non-cash activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,031
|
|
|||
Accrued purchases of property and equipment
|
10,012
|
|
|
4,776
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|||
Asset retirement obligations recognized, net
|
271
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Property and equipment acquired under build-to-suit lease
|
—
|
|
|
11,600
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Property and equipment sold in sale-leaseback transaction
|
—
|
|
|
11,600
|
|
|
—
|
|
•
|
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
|
•
|
the software or services have been delivered to the customer;
|
•
|
the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and
|
•
|
the collection of the related fees is probable.
|
•
|
whether such services are considered essential to the functionality of the software using factors such as the nature of the software products;
|
•
|
whether they are ready for use by the customer upon receipt;
|
•
|
the nature of the services, which typically do not involve significant customization to or development of the underlying software code;
|
•
|
the availability of services from other vendors;
|
•
|
whether the timing of payments for license revenues coincides with performance of services; and
|
•
|
whether milestones or acceptance criteria exist that affect the realizability of the software license fee.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
250
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
789
|
|
|||
Accounts written off
|
(473
|
)
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|||
Balance at the end of the period
|
$
|
888
|
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
•
|
Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
•
|
Level 2—Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.
|
•
|
Level 3—Inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions and valuation techniques used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation.
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
(in months)
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||
Computer equipment and software
|
36
|
|
$
|
73,052
|
|
|
$
|
43,340
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
36
|
|
14,602
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
||
Leasehold improvements
|
10-150
|
|
26,656
|
|
|
15,444
|
|
||
Construction in progress
|
|
|
7,140
|
|
|
5,397
|
|
||
|
|
|
121,450
|
|
|
72,674
|
|
||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(49,100
|
)
|
|
(27,047
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
$
|
72,350
|
|
|
$
|
45,627
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
United States
|
|
$
|
(27,779
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,217
|
|
|
$
|
2,182
|
|
International
|
|
(23,028
|
)
|
|
965
|
|
|
683
|
|
|||
Total
|
|
$
|
(50,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,182
|
|
|
$
|
2,865
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Federal
|
$
|
4,009
|
|
|
$
|
11,057
|
|
|
$
|
3,732
|
|
State
|
771
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
741
|
|
|||
Foreign
|
5,240
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
531
|
|
|||
Total current income tax expense
|
10,020
|
|
|
16,218
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|||
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Federal
|
22,011
|
|
|
(12,970
|
)
|
|
(8,772
|
)
|
|||
State
|
1,839
|
|
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|||
Foreign
|
(977
|
)
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|||
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
22,873
|
|
|
(14,909
|
)
|
|
(9,215
|
)
|
|||
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
32,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) at statutory rate
|
$
|
(17,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,514
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
(896
|
)
|
|
207
|
|
|
67
|
|
|||
Impact of foreign income taxes
|
10,582
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
235
|
|
|||
Research and development and other tax credits
|
(10,187
|
)
|
|
(6,499
|
)
|
|
(7,840
|
)
|
|||
Non-deductible stock-based compensation
|
3,174
|
|
|
2,929
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|||
Non-deductible meals and entertainment
|
1,395
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
582
|
|
|||
Change in valuation allowance
|
46,737
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Other, net
|
(129
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|||
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
32,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
9,704
|
|
|
$
|
2,082
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
21,924
|
|
|
10,499
|
|
||
Accrued compensation
|
|
11,819
|
|
|
10,529
|
|
||
Deferred revenue
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
||
Deferred rent
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
334
|
|
||
Other
|
|
553
|
|
|
569
|
|
||
Total deferred income tax assets
|
|
52,032
|
|
|
26,745
|
|
||
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Prepaid assets
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
||
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
||
Net deferred income tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
48,275
|
|
|
24,603
|
|
||
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
(46,737
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
24,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Reported As:
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Deferred income taxes - current
|
|
—
|
|
|
18,732
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes - long-term
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
5,879
|
|
||
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
||
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
|
$
|
24,603
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$
|
7,116
|
|
|
$
|
3,441
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
Gross increases to tax positions related to prior periods
|
545
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|||
Gross decreases to tax positions related to prior periods
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|||
Gross increases related to current tax positions
|
3,120
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|||
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
10,781
|
|
|
$
|
7,116
|
|
|
$
|
3,441
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|||||||||||
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||
Balances at December 31, 2014
|
8,515,879
|
|
|
$
|
8.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Options exercised
|
(2,458,549
|
)
|
|
8.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Options canceled
|
(26
|
)
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Options forfeited
|
(103,533
|
)
|
|
13.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balances at December 31, 2015
|
5,953,771
|
|
|
$
|
8.92
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
$
|
507,885
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2015
|
5,932,740
|
|
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
$
|
506,247
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
|
4,646,524
|
|
|
$
|
7.69
|
|
|
5.71
|
|
$
|
402,075
|
|
|
Number of Shares Underlying Outstanding RSUs
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value per RSU
|
|||
Non-Vested outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
2,818,661
|
|
|
$
|
77.77
|
|
RSUs granted
|
3,671,156
|
|
|
101.52
|
|
|
RSUs vested
|
(877,696
|
)
|
|
77.44
|
|
|
RSUs forfeited
|
(206,044
|
)
|
|
86.74
|
|
|
Non-Vested outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
5,406,077
|
|
|
$
|
93.61
|
|
|
Shares Available for Grant
|
||||
|
2013 Plan
|
|
2013 ESPP
|
||
Balances at December 31, 2014
|
6,229,892
|
|
|
2,621,986
|
|
Authorized
|
3,493,410
|
|
|
698,682
|
|
Granted
|
(3,671,156
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Canceled
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
309,577
|
|
|
—
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2015
|
6,361,749
|
|
|
3,320,668
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2013
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
1.11%
|
Expected term
|
5 years
|
Expected dividends
|
None
|
Expected volatility
|
46.8%
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
0.42%
|
Expected term
|
0.5 years
|
Expected dividends
|
None
|
Expected volatility
|
47.97%
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
||
2016
|
|
$
|
22,957
|
|
2017
|
|
33,065
|
|
|
2018
|
|
41,301
|
|
|
2019
|
|
44,293
|
|
|
2020
|
|
42,712
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
259,175
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
443,503
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
United States and Canada
|
$
|
489,329
|
|
|
$
|
318,835
|
|
|
$
|
186,725
|
|
International
|
164,258
|
|
|
93,781
|
|
|
45,715
|
|
|||
Total revenues
|
$
|
653,587
|
|
|
$
|
412,616
|
|
|
$
|
232,440
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share - basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic net income (loss) per share
|
71,701
|
|
|
67,591
|
|
|
50,564
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) per share - basic
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income (loss) per share - diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(83,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,076
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic net income (loss) per share
|
71,701
|
|
|
67,591
|
|
|
50,564
|
|
|||
Effect of potentially dilutive shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Stock awards
|
—
|
|
|
6,728
|
|
|
8,528
|
|
|||
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute diluted net income (loss) per share
|
71,701
|
|
|
74,319
|
|
|
59,092
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) per share - diluted
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|||
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Shares subject to outstanding common stock awards
|
11,510
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||
Description
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Money market funds
|
$
|
736,806
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
736,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||||||||||
Description
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Money market funds
|
$
|
667,210
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
667,210
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dec 31, 2015
|
|
Sept 30, 2015
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
March 31, 2015
|
|
Dec 31, 2014
|
|
Sept 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
$
|
202,750
|
|
|
$
|
170,832
|
|
|
$
|
149,860
|
|
|
$
|
130,145
|
|
|
$
|
142,923
|
|
|
$
|
104,469
|
|
|
$
|
90,673
|
|
|
$
|
74,551
|
|
Gross profit
|
181,115
|
|
|
150,956
|
|
|
133,107
|
|
|
114,724
|
|
|
131,312
|
|
|
94,928
|
|
|
82,033
|
|
|
67,358
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
(41,321
|
)
|
|
(13,373
|
)
|
|
(18,979
|
)
|
|
(10,027
|
)
|
|
20,707
|
|
|
(4,631
|
)
|
|
(4,574
|
)
|
|
(5,629
|
)
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
||||||
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
Filed Herewith
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Tableau Software, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-35925
|
|
3.1
|
|
5/23/2013
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Tableau Software, Inc.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
3.4
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
4.1.1
|
|
Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
4.1.1
|
|
5/23/2013
|
|
|
4.1.2
|
|
Form of Class B Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
S-1A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
4.1.2
|
|
5/23/2013
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, by and among Tableau Software, Inc. and the investors listed on Exhibit A thereto, dated July 27, 2012.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
4.2
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.1†
|
|
Tableau Software, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.1
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.2†
|
|
Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.2
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.3†
|
|
Tableau Software, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.3
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.4†
|
|
Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.4
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.5†
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement and Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2013
|
|
|
10.6†
|
|
Tableau Software, Inc. 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.5
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.7†
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement made by and between Tableau Software, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.6
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.8†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Christian Chabot, dated April 26, 2013.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.7
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.9†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Christopher Stolte, dated April 26, 2013.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.8
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.10†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Thomas Walker, dated April 26, 2013.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.9
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.11†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Kelly Wright, dated February 10, 2005.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.10
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.12†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Elissa Fink, dated June 13, 2007.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.11
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.13†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Keenan Conder, dated December 16, 2011.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.12
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.14†
|
|
Form of Conversion Agreement entered into between Tableau Software, Inc. and each of Christian Chabot, Christopher Stolte and Patrick Hanrahan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.13
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.15*
|
|
Software License Agreement between the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Tableau Software LLC, dated January 14, 2003.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.14
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Software License Agreement between the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Tableau Software LLC, dated June 8, 2004.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.15
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Office Lease Agreement between Michael R. Mastro and Tableau Software, Inc., dated February 19, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.17
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
First Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between Michael R. Mastro and Tableau Software, Inc., dated April 3, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.18
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Second Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between BBK Lake View, LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated March 24, 2011.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.19
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Third Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between BBK Lake View, LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated August 22, 2012.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.20
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.21†
|
|
Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.21
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between FREMONT LAKE UNION CENTER LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated December 11, 2014.
|
|
10-K
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.23
|
|
2/27/2015
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between Fremont Lake Union Center LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated March 4, 2015.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/8/2015
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Office Lease Agreement between NorthEdge Developers LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated July 2, 2015.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.1
|
|
11/9/2015
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between Fremont Lake Union Center LLC, KR Lakeview, LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated November 19, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
21.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page hereto).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Principal Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Principal Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLEAU SOFTWARE, INC.
|
By: /s/ Christian Chabot
|
|
Christian Chabot
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/s/ Christian Chabot
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Co-founder and Chairman of the Board (principal executive officer)
|
|
February 25, 2016
|
Christian Chabot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas E. Walker, Jr.
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|
|
February 25, 2016
|
Thomas E. Walker, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick Hanrahan
|
|
Chief Scientist, Co-founder and Director
|
|
February 25, 2016
|
Patrick Hanrahan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher Stolte
|
|
Chief Development Officer, Co-founder and Director
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
Christopher Stolte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Forest Baskett
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
Forest Baskett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Billy Bosworth
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
Billy Bosworth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brooke Seawell
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
Brooke Seawell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Elliott Jurgensen, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
Elliott Jurgensen, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John McAdam
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
John McAdam
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
||||||
Exhibit No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
Filed Herewith
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Tableau Software, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-35925
|
|
3.1
|
|
5/23/2013
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Tableau Software, Inc.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
3.4
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
4.1.1
|
|
Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
4.1.1
|
|
5/23/2013
|
|
|
4.1.2
|
|
Form of Class B Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
S-1A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
4.1.2
|
|
5/23/2013
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, by and among Tableau Software, Inc. and the investors listed on Exhibit A thereto, dated July 27, 2012.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
4.2
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.1†
|
|
Tableau Software, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.1
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.2†
|
|
Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.2
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.3†
|
|
Tableau Software, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.3
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.4†
|
|
Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.4
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.5†
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement and Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2013
|
|
|
10.6†
|
|
Tableau Software, Inc. 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.5
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.7†
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement made by and between Tableau Software, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.6
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.8†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Christian Chabot, dated April 26, 2013.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.7
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.9†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Christopher Stolte, dated April 26, 2013.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.8
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.10†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Thomas Walker, dated April 26, 2013.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.9
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.11†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Kelly Wright, dated February 10, 2005.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.10
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.12†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Elissa Fink, dated June 13, 2007.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.11
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.13†
|
|
Offer Letter between Tableau Software, Inc. and Keenan Conder, dated December 16, 2011.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.12
|
|
5/6/2013
|
|
|
10.14†
|
|
Form of Conversion Agreement entered into between Tableau Software, Inc. and each of Christian Chabot, Christopher Stolte and Patrick Hanrahan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.13
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.15*
|
|
Software License Agreement between the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Tableau Software LLC, dated January 14, 2003.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.14
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Software License Agreement between the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Tableau Software LLC, dated June 8, 2004.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.15
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Office Lease Agreement between Michael R. Mastro and Tableau Software, Inc., dated February 19, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.17
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
First Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between Michael R. Mastro and Tableau Software, Inc., dated April 3, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.18
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Second Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between BBK Lake View, LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated March 24, 2011.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.19
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Third Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between BBK Lake View, LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated August 22, 2012.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.20
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.21†
|
|
Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-187683
|
|
10.21
|
|
4/2/2013
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between FREMONT LAKE UNION CENTER LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated December 11, 2014.
|
|
10-K
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.23
|
|
2/27/2015
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between Fremont Lake Union Center LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated March 4, 2015.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/8/2015
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Office Lease Agreement between NorthEdge Developers LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated July 2, 2015.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-35925
|
|
10.1
|
|
11/9/2015
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement between Fremont Lake Union Center LLC, KR Lakeview, LLC and Tableau Software, Inc., dated November 19, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
21.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page hereto).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Principal Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Principal Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
LANDLORD
"
|
FREMONT LAKE UNION CENTER LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: KILROY REALTY, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
Its Sole Member
By: Kilroy Realty Corporation,
a Maryland corporation,
doing business in the State of Washington as Kilroy Realty Northwest Corporation
its General Partner
By:
/s/ J. Michael Shields
Name:
J. Michael Shields
Its:
Sr. Vice President
By:
/s/ Robert E. Palmer
Name:
Robert E. Palmer
Its:
Senior Vice President, Operations
KR LAKEVIEW, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Kilroy Realty, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership Its Sole Member
By: Kilroy Realty Corporation,
a Maryland Corporation
doing business in the State of Washington as Kilroy Realty
Northwest Corporation,
Its General Partner
By:
/s/ J. Michael Shields
Name:
J. Michael Shields
Its:
Sr. Vice President
By:
/s/ Robert E. Palmer
Name:
Robert E. Palmer
Its:
Senior Vice President, Operations
|
"
TENANT
"
|
TABLEAU SOFTWARE, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
By:
/s/ Thomas Walker
Name:
Thomas Walker
Its:
CFO
By:
/s/ Keenan Conder
Name:
Keenan M Conder
Its:
VP & General Counsel
|
STATE OF
Washington
|
)
|
|
) ss.
|
COUNTY OF
King
|
)
|
STATE OF
Washington
|
)
|
|
) ss.
|
COUNTY OF
King
|
)
|
STATE OF
Washington
|
)
|
|
) ss.
|
COUNTY OF
King
|
)
|
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
)
|
|
)
|
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
)
|
STATE OF
Washington
|
)
|
|
) ss.
|
COUNTY OF
King
|
)
|
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
)
|
|
)
|
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
)
|
To:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re:
|
Office Lease dated ____________, 20__ (as amended, the "
Lease
"), by and between ____________________, a _____________________ ("
Landlord
"), and _______________________, a _______________________ ("
Tenant
") for certain expansion premises, commonly known as Suite _______ and containing approximately _______________ rentable square feet of space (the "
Expansion
Premises
"), located on the ______________ (____) floor of that certain office building located at 701 N. 34
th
Street, Seattle, Washington 98103 (the "
Building
").
|
1.
|
Tenant has accepted the above-referenced Expansion Premises as being delivered in accordance with the Lease and to Tenant's knowledge there is no deficiency in construction.
|
2.
|
The Lease Term for the Expansion Premises shall commence on or has commenced on ______________ for a term of __________________ ending on __________________.
|
3.
|
Monthly Base Rent for the Expansion Premises commenced to accrue on __________________, in the amount of ________________.
|
4.
|
If the _______ Commencement Date is other than the first day of the month, the first billing will contain a pro rata adjustment. Each billing thereafter shall be for the full amount of the monthly installment as provided for in the Lease.
|
5.
|
Your rent checks under the Lease should be made payable to __________________ at ___________________.
|
6.
|
The rentable square feet of the Expansion Premises is ________________.
|
7.
|
Tenant's Share of Direct Expenses with respect to the Expansion Premises is ________% of the Project.
|
8.
|
Capitalized terms used herein that are defined in the Lease shall have the same meaning when used herein. Landlord and Tenant confirm that the Lease has not been modified or altered except as set forth herein, and the Lease is in full force and effect. Landlord and Tenant acknowledge and agree that to each party's actual knowledge, neither party is in default or violation of any covenant, provision, obligation, agreement or condition in the Lease.
|
|
"Landlord":
a
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
|
Agreed to and Accepted
as of ____________, 20__.
"Tenant":
a
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
|
Tableau Japan K.K.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
Tableau Canada Co.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Tableau International, Unlimited Company
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
Tableau Software UK Ltd.
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
Tableau Germany GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
Tableau Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
Tableau Holdings, Unlimited Company
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
Tableau Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
Tableau India Pvt. Ltd.
|
|
India
|
|
|
Tableau (China) Co., Ltd.
|
|
China
|
|
|
Tableau France S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tableau Software, Inc.;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
a.
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
b.
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
c.
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d.
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
a.
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
b.
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
By: /s/ Christian Chabot
|
Christian Chabot
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
(Principal Executive
|
Officer)
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tableau Software, Inc.;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
a.
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
b.
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
c.
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d.
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
a.
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
b.
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
By: /s/ Thomas E. Walker
|
|
Thomas E. Walker, Jr.
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial and
|
|
Accounting Officer)
|
1.
|
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
|
2.
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
Date: February 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christian Chabot
|
|
/s/ Thomas E. Walker, Jr.
|
Christian Chabot
|
|
Thomas E. Walker, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|