ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business as they may have a significant impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Because of the following factors, as well as other variables affecting our operating results, past financial performance should not be considered as a reliable indicator of future performance and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
Risks Related to Our Business
Changes and developments in the health insurance industry or in the health insurance system in the United States as a result of health care reform could harm our business.
Our business depends upon the private sector of the United States health insurance system, its relative role in financing health care delivery and health insurance carriers’ use of, and payment of commissions to, agents and brokers to market health insurance plans. In March 2010, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act were signed into law. These health care reform laws contain provisions that have and will continue to change the industry in which we operate in substantial ways. Among several other provisions, health care reform includes a mandate that individuals have qualifying health insurance or face a tax penalty, although the tax penalty is set at zero beginning in 2019; a mandate that certain employers offer their employees group health insurance coverage or face tax penalties; requirements relating to employer contribution to employee health coverage; prohibitions against insurance companies using pre-existing health conditions as a reason to deny an application for health insurance; prohibitions on rescission of health insurance; prohibitions on lifetime coverage limits; requirements for guaranteed renewability of health insurance plans; health insurance premium setting guidelines; limitations on deductibles and cost-sharing; medical loss ratio requirements that require each health insurance carrier to spend a certain percentage of their premium revenue on reimbursement for clinical services and activities that improve health care quality and, if they do not, to provide rebates to policyholders; minimum benefit levels for health insurance plans, including actuarial value standards and limitations on annual coverage limits; taxes and assessments on health insurance carriers; establishment of state and/or federal health insurance exchanges to facilitate access to, and the purchase of, health insurance; open enrollment periods for the purchase of individual and family health insurance; creation of multi-state health insurance plans to be offered on the exchanges and with oversight from the Office of Personnel Management; an expansion of Medicaid so that more individuals will be insured under state Medicaid programs; and subsidies and cost-sharing credits to make health insurance more affordable for those below certain income levels. The implementation of health care reform has increased and could further increase our competition and could reduce or eliminate the need for health insurance agents or demand for the health insurance for individuals, families or small businesses that we sell; decrease the number of health insurance plans that we sell as well as the number of health insurance
carriers offering them; cause a substantial reduction in our membership and revenue; cause us to incur increased expense across our business and cause health insurance carriers to reduce our commissions and other amounts they pay for our services or change our relationship with them in other ways, any of which could materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, various aspects of health care reform have caused and could continue to cause health insurance carriers to determine to limit the type of health insurance plans we sell and the geographies in which we sell them, to reduce or eliminate the commissions we receive from them as a result of our sale of health insurance plans, to exit the business of selling individual and family health insurance plans in particular jurisdictions or altogether, to eliminate certain categories of products or attempt to move members into new plans for which we receive lower or no commissions, any of which could materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurance carriers offering coverage in the individual or small business health insurance market must ensure that such coverage meets certain actuarial value standards, includes certain minimum health benefits and is not subject to lifetime or, for most health insurance benefits, annual dollar amount coverage limits. Moreover, health insurance carriers cannot deny individuals health insurance for health reasons. For these and other reasons, the cost of health insurance has generally increased and many health insurance carriers have suffered financial losses in their individual and family health insurance businesses.
As a result, many health insurance carriers have exited the individual and family health insurance business in part or altogether. The number of individual and family health insurance plans offered on our website has been reduced, including many states and zip codes where we have no individual and family health insurance plans to offer. If these conditions persist, we anticipate that they will continue to decrease demand for the individual and family health insurance that we sell and harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, a significant number of our members purchased their individual and family health insurance from carriers exiting the individual and family health insurance market. These members have or will lose their health insurance plans and will need to shop for and purchase individual and family health insurance from another health insurance carrier if they desire to maintain individual and family health insurance. These circumstances have resulted and could in the future result in decreased retention rates in our membership, a reduction in our commission revenue and otherwise harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If additional health insurance carriers determine not to sell individual and family health insurance, the impact on our individual and family membership and commission revenue will likely be more pronounced.
In addition, many health insurance carriers have increased premiums on the individual and family health insurance that they sell as a result of health care reform. As a result of premium inflation, we have experienced and could in the future experience a reduction in demand for the individual and family health insurance that we sell, which could cause us to suffer a substantial reduction in our membership, and materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, compared to the increased cost of individual and family health insurance plans, government subsidies to purchase health insurance may not be sufficient enough to drive a substantial number of new entrants into the individual and family health insurance market or incentivize our existing members to maintain their individual and family health insurance plans, which could contribute to a decline in our membership and materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
The Trump administration and Republican leadership in Congress have attempted on several occasions to repeal or amend the Affordable Care Act, but their efforts at doing so have largely failed. The Affordable Care Act contains a mandate requiring individuals to maintain health insurance plans that comply with the Affordable Care Act or face a tax penalty. As a part of the tax reform law that came into effect in December 2017, the tax penalty for violating the mandate was set at zero effective in 2019, essentially repealing it. The essential repeal of the individual mandate could cause individuals to determine not to purchase or maintain individual and family health insurance and could cause carriers to increase premiums, reduce commissions or exit the business of selling individual and family health insurance, any of which would adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition to eliminating the penalty for violating the individual mandate, the Trump administration issued an executive order in October 2017 that directed the executive branch of the government to consider proposing regulations and revising guidance to expand access to association health plans, expand the availability of short term health insurance and increase the usability of health reimbursement arrangements. As a result of the executive order, new regulations have been proposed that would facilitate association-based health insurance plans and promote the sale of more short term health insurance. The expansion of the availability of short term health insurance may cause individuals and families to purchase short term health insurance instead of individual and family health insurance, which could adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition if any reduction in our sales of individual and family health insurance is not offset by increased sales of short term health insurance. If adopted, the proposed regulations relating to association health plans would allow small businesses to join industry or geographically-based associations and collectively purchase a large group health insurance plans. Large group health insurance is not subject to many of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, including the requirement that health insurance plans cover all of the essential health benefits defined under the Affordable Care Act. The goal of the proposed regulation is to reduce the cost of insurance for individuals who receive their health insurance through associations. The
proposed regulation could present new business opportunities for us, but it also may reduce the size of the individual, family and small business health insurance markets that we are able to address, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In light of the current state of the individual and family health insurance market, it appears likely that the Trump administration will continue to attempt to make changes to the Affordable Care Act and its implementing regulations. If the changes do not stabilize the individual and family health insurance market and encourage health insurance carriers to sell affordable individual and family health insurance, our individual and family health insurance business will continue to be adversely impacted.
If we do not retain our existing members and enroll a large number of individuals and families into health insurance plans during enrollment periods, our business will be harmed.
Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans are required to be purchased during an annual enrollment period, subject to certain exceptions. As a result of health care reform, individual and family health insurance is required to be purchased during an open enrollment period. Our revenue depends in large part on the number of paying individual and family and Medicare-related health insurance members we are successful in retaining and on those we acquire during the enrollment periods. We may not be successful in retaining or acquiring members for a number of reasons. If we are unsuccessful, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. For example, we have experienced a decrease in our individual and family membership retention rates since the implementation of health care reform. We also experienced significantly lower individual and family health insurance application volumes during the last two open enrollment periods. These circumstances have significantly reduced our individual and family health insurance plan membership. An open enrollment period of limited duration in the individual and family health insurance market has resulted, and may in the future result in a reduction in our membership and revenue; an increase in our expenses, particularly during the open enrollment period; and otherwise may harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
It is difficult for the health insurance agents we employ and our systems and processes to handle the increased volume of health insurance transactions that occur in a short period of time during the health care reform annual open enrollment period and the Medicare annual enrollment period. We contract with outsourced call centers and hire additional employees on a temporary or seasonal basis in a limited period of time to address the expected increase in the volume of health insurance transactions during the Medicare annual enrollment period. We must ensure that these employees are timely licensed, trained and certified and have the appropriate authority to sell health insurance in a number of states. We depend upon state departments of insurance, government exchanges and health insurance carriers for the licensing, certification and appointment of our health insurance agent employees. If our ability to market and sell Medicare-related health insurance and individual and family health insurance is constrained during an enrollment period for any reason, such as technology failures, reduced allocation of resources, any inability to timely license, train, certify and authorize our employees and contractors to sell health insurance, interruptions in the operation of our website or systems, or issues with government-run health insurance exchanges, we could suffer a reduction in our membership and our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, reduced the length of the open enrollment period for individual and family health insurance so that it runs from November 1 to December 15, which could amplify the risks we face as a result of open enrollment periods. In addition, reduction in the amount of time we have to enroll individuals and families during the open enrollment period could result in a reduction in our membership and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If investments we make in enrollment periods do not result in a significant number of paying members, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
In an attempt to attract and enroll a large number of individuals during the Medicare annual enrollment period and the health care reform open enrollment period, we may invest in areas of our business, including technology and content, customer care and enrollment, and marketing and advertising. We have in the past made investments in areas of our business in advance of enrollment periods that have not resulted in the results we expected when making those investments. Any investment we make in either the Medicare annual enrollment period or the health care reform open enrollment period may not result in a significant number of paying members. If it does not, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
Our business may be harmed if we do not enroll subsidy-eligible individuals through government-run health insurance exchanges efficiently.
In order to offer the qualified health plans that individuals and families must purchase to receive Affordable Care Act subsidies, agents and brokers must meet certain conditions, such as receiving permission to do so from the applicable government health insurance exchange, entering into an agreement with the health insurance exchange, ensuring that the enrollment and subsidy application is completed through the health insurance exchange and complying with privacy, security
and other standards, some of which contain requirements that are new to us. In the event Internet-based agents and brokers such as us use the Internet for completion of qualified health plan selection purposes, their websites are required to meet certain additional requirements. To the extent we enroll individuals and families into qualified health plans, we do so through our relationship with the Federally Facilitated Marketplace, or FFM, which runs all or part of the health insurance exchange in 36 states. We have not focused on enrolling individuals into qualified health plans through exchanges in states operating their own health insurance exchanges. We may experience difficulty in satisfying the conditions and requirements to offer qualified health plans to our existing members and new potential members and in enrolling them through the FFM. If we are not able to satisfy these conditions and requirements, or if we are not able to successfully adopt and maintain solutions that allow us to enroll large numbers of individuals and families in qualified plans over the Internet both during and outside of open enrollment periods, we will lose existing members and new members, and may incur additional expense, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, if we are not able to adopt and maintain solutions to integrate with government-run health insurance exchanges or if the health insurance exchange websites and other processes are unstable or not consumer friendly, efficient and compatible with the process we have developed for enrolling individuals and families into qualified health plans through the exchanges, we would not be successful in retaining and acquiring members, and our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. The FFM may at any time cease allowing us to enroll individuals in qualified health plans or change the requirements for doing so. We must allocate resources to ensuring, and otherwise ensure, that its technology platform functions properly to enroll individuals online with an adequate customer experience and that results in our receiving credit for enrollments so that we may be paid a commission. If the FFM platform does not function properly, our ability to retain existing members and add new members could be negatively impacted, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
CMS has broad authority over the requirements that we must meet in order to enroll individuals into qualified health plans through the FFM, and in addition to issuing new requirements, has the authority to interpret existing requirements. CMS directed us to alter our method of enrolling subsidy eligible individuals into qualified health insurance plans beginning in February 2016. The change required us to cease using the online process we developed for enrolling individuals into qualified health plans through the FFM and use a prescribed FFM process that required that our customers visit the FFM website in the middle of purchasing health insurance to receive a subsidy eligibility determination. The FFM process resulted in a reduction in the rate at which individuals and families starting the application process for qualified health plans and subsidies became members and a reduction in our membership. If we are forced to use this process, we could continue to experience loss of existing members and new potential members and a reduction in our individual and family health insurance plan membership and commission revenue, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We have entered into agreements with CMS relating to our ability to enroll individuals in qualified health plans through the FFM. The agreements contain comprehensive privacy and security and other requirements. In order to be able to enroll individuals into qualified health plans, we also must satisfy several other regulatory requirements and comply with additional laws and regulations. In order to enroll individuals into qualified health plans online through the FFM, we must among other things, maintain our agreements with the FFM which need to be renewed every year; satisfy the requirements contained in the relevant agreements as well as applicable laws and regulations; maintain a compliant Internet platform incorporating those requirements; maintain qualified health plan information from health insurance carriers and CMS and incorporate it into our web platform; maintain a privacy and security program to conform to the privacy and security requirements of our agreement with CMS as well as applicable laws and regulations; and adopt and maintain solutions to integrate with the FFM so that information may be passed to and from us relating to enrollment in qualified health plans and subsidy eligibility. If we do not comply with applicable laws, regulations and requirements, our ability to enroll individuals into qualified health plans through the FFM could be terminated and we may be required to pay significant monetary penalties, which would harm our business operating results and financial condition.
CMS issued new guidance in May 2017 that makes it possible for us to implement a process for subsidy-eligible individuals to enroll into qualified health insurance plans and apply for advanced payment of premium tax credits through the FFM without leaving our website. In October 2017, we entered into an agreement with CMS that permits us to use this improved process if we ensure that the user experience meets several regulatory requirements. In addition, we must comply with numerous privacy and security requirements. The new enrollment process also has limitations, including the inability to purchase less expensive catastrophic health insurance and an inability to process certain more complex qualified health plans and subsidy eligibility applications for which we are required to use the “double redirect” process that is cumbersome and difficult for consumers to navigate. In addition, CMS may make changes that could affect our ability to process health insurance applications efficiently using this new enrollment process. If we cannot successfully maintain use of the process that allows us to enroll subsidy eligible individuals into qualified health insurance plans through the FFM without leaving our website, we could experience loss of existing members and new potential members, and a reduction in our individual and family health insurance plan membership and commission revenue, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, if a significant percentage of consumers who come to our platform are complex cases that must
use the double redirect process, we will not realize the benefit of the new process and our conversion rates and individual and family health insurance membership and revenue may decline.
The laws, regulations and requirements applicable to enrolling individuals in qualified health plans through government-run health insurance exchanges are evolving. For example, CMS has indicated that it intends to abandon support of the improved qualified health plan enrollment process in favor of an even better process that allows us to access the database of information relating to health plans and subsidy eligibility through an application programming interface. While we believe this process is better than the existing and improved process, CMS has indicated that we will be required to satisfy numerous additional privacy and security requirements to be able to use it. We may not be able to meet these requirements in time for the upcoming open enrollment period, and if CMS abandons the existing improved process, we would be required to use the "double redirect" process for qualified health plan enrollment, which would result in our experiencing a reduction in our individual and family health insurance plan membership and revenue and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If we do not successfully compete with government-run health insurance exchanges, our business may be harmed.
We compete with government-run health insurance exchanges, among others. The exchanges may elect whether or not we are able to enroll subsidy-eligible individuals in qualified health plans through them and determine the manner in which we may do so. The exchanges have websites where individuals and small businesses can shop for and purchase health insurance, and they also have offline customer support and enrollment capabilities. Individuals who are eligible for government subsidies in the form of premium tax credits and cost sharing reductions must apply for their subsidy and purchase qualified health plans through a government exchange to receive their subsidy. In the aggregate, government exchanges have greater resources and greater public outreach capability than we do. They have and may in the future impact the process we use to enroll individuals and families through them in a manner that results in a reduction of the individuals and families that we are able to cost-effectively enroll through exchanges. In addition, individuals that utilize our platform and services to apply for subsidies and health insurance through government exchanges receive marketing and communications from the government exchanges after they do so. In the event our existing members purchase health insurance directly through health insurance exchanges without using us as their health insurance agent, as a result of their being eligible for a subsidy or otherwise, we will no longer receive commission revenue as a result of our sale of health insurance to them. Under regulations adopted as a part of health care reform, government-run health insurance exchanges are required to automatically re-enroll individuals and families into a qualified health insurance plan purchased through the exchange if the individuals or families do not take affirmative action, which may contribute to a reduction in our membership. Competitive pressure from government-run health insurance exchanges has resulted, and may in the future result, in our experiencing increased marketing costs, decreased traffic to our website, a reduction in our individual and family health insurance membership and revenue and may otherwise harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our revenue will be adversely impacted if commission rates decline or if consumers choose health insurance products for which we receive lower or no commissions.
Our revenue will be adversely impacted if our commission rates decline. The commission rates we receive are impacted by a variety of factors, including the particular health insurance plans chosen by our members, the carriers offering those plans, our members’ states of residence, the laws and regulations in those jurisdictions, the average premiums of plans purchased through us and health care reform. Our commission revenue per member has in the past decreased, and could in the future decrease, as a result of either reductions in contractual commission rates, unfavorable changes in health insurance carrier override commission programs, or the mix of carriers whose products we sell during a given period, all of which are beyond our control and may occur on short notice. To the extent these and other factors cause our commission revenue per member to decline, our revenue may decline and our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
Our revenue will be adversely impacted if consumers enroll in Medicare or individual and family health insurance plans that reduce our average commission revenue per member. Due in part to health care reform, major health insurance carriers and other health insurance carriers have exited the individual and family health insurance market in certain jurisdictions or altogether or reduced individual and family health insurance selling efforts in a large number of states, leading to reduction in our commission rates and changes in the health insurance carrier composition of our commission revenue. Since our commission rates vary by carrier, a shift in the mix of products selected by our new members will have an impact on our average commission revenue per member. We do not plan to offer carriers’ individual and family health insurance products on our website if we do not receive commissions for the sale of those plans. Given the significant losses that carriers have sustained in connection with their sale of individual and family health insurance, many health insurance carriers with which we have a relationship, including large national health insurance carriers, reduced or eliminated commissions for individual and
family health insurance. If these conditions persist, or additional carriers reduce or eliminate commissions, our business operating results and financial conditions would be harmed.
Our business may be harmed if we lose our relationship with health insurance carriers or our relationship with health insurance carriers is modified.
We typically enter into contractual agency relationships with health insurance carriers that are non-exclusive and terminable on short notice by either party for any reason. In many cases, health insurance carriers also may amend the terms of our agreements unilaterally on short notice. Carriers may be unwilling to allow us to sell their existing or new health insurance plans, or desire to amend our agreements with them, for a variety of reasons, including for competitive or regulatory reasons, dissatisfaction with the economics of the members that we place with them or because they do not want to be associated with our brand. We may also terminate our relationship with health insurance carriers. In addition, many aspects of health care reform have caused, and may in the future cause, carriers to modify their relationship with us given the substantial changes in the industry in which we operate. Carriers may choose to exclude us from their most profitable or popular plans or may determine not to distribute health insurance plans in the Medicare, individual and family and small business markets in certain geographies or altogether. In the event we are not successful in gaining or maintaining the ability to sell Medicare, individual and family and qualified health insurance plans, if health insurance carriers pay us no commissions or reduced commissions in connection with the sale of these plans or if health insurance carriers change our relationship with them in other ways, we could lose a substantial number of existing and potential members and commission revenue, which would materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition. The termination of our relationship with a health insurance carrier by us or the health insurance carrier or the amendment of or change in our relationship with a carrier could reduce the variety of health insurance plans we offer, cause a loss of commission revenue or have other adverse impacts, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. It also could adversely impact, or cause the termination of, commissions for past and future sales, which would materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Our business could also be harmed if in the future we fail to develop new carrier relationships and are unable to offer consumers a variety of health insurance plans in each jurisdiction.
Given the significant losses that carriers have sustained in connection with their sale of individual and family health insurance as a result of health care reform, many health insurance carriers with which we have a relationship, including large national health insurance carriers, reduced or eliminated our commissions for selling individual and family health insurance, and in a limited number of cases, our renewal commissions. As a result, we have experienced a meaningful reduction in our average commission rates for our aggregate individual and family health insurance plan membership. In addition, the reduction in contractual commission rates and these carriers’ desire to not sell individual and family health insurance has reduced the number of plans that we are able to offer on our websites, which results in less consumer demand for the individual and family health insurance that we sell and a reduction in our membership. In the future and as a result of health care reform or for other reasons, an increasing number of health insurance carriers may decide to reduce our commissions, rely on their own internal distribution channels to sell their own plans, determine not sell individual and family health insurance or otherwise limit or prohibit us from selling their plans on our ecommerce platforms. In addition to reducing commission rates, health insurance carriers may determine to exit the individual and family health insurance business in certain states or increase premiums to a significant degree, which could cause our members’ health insurance to be terminated or our members to purchase new health insurance or determine not to pay for health insurance at all. If we lose these members, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed. In addition, if the number of individual and family health insurance products that we are able to offer does not increase, we will continue to experienced reduced demand for our services and a reduction in our membership, which would harm our, business, operating results and financial results.
Changes in our management and key employees could affect our business and financial results.
Our success depends upon the performance of our executive officers and key personnel. Our executive officers and employees can terminate their employment at any time. We have recently experienced significant changes in our senior management. In May 2016, Scott Flanders became our chief executive officer. In June 2016, our former president and chief operating officer resigned. David Francis became our chief financial officer in July 2016 and chief operations officer in October 2016. Mr. Francis most recently became our chief operating officer in January 2018 and Robert Hurley became our president, carrier and business development in January 2018. Tom Tsao, president, small business, individual and family products, resigned in April 2017. In addition to these changes, other senior executive officers have left us, and we have hired additional senior executives, including Tim Hannan, chief marketing officer, Ian Kalin, chief data officer, and David Nicklaus, senior vice president, sales and operations. We also recently announced that all of our revenue operations will report to Mr. Francis and that in light of these increased responsibilites we would begin the search for a new chief financial officer. The change in leadership we have experienced has been significant and has occurred over a short period of time. The transition and the departure of members of our senior management could result in further attrition in our senior management and key personnel and the significant change in leadership over a short period of time could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or key employees could harm our business. For example, we appoint a single writing agent with each insurance carrier. If we lose the service of our appointed writing agent, the duties of writing agent will need to be transitioned to other company personnel. Due to our national reach and the large number of carrier partners whose policies are purchased by our members, this transition may be difficult and requires a significant period of time to complete. If the transition is not successful or takes too long to complete, our agency relationship with particular insurance carriers may be terminated, our commission payments could be discontinued or delayed and, as a result, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. Our success is also dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel for all areas of our organization. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining personnel on a timely basis, on competitive terms or at all. If we are unable to attract and retain the necessary personnel, our business would be harmed.
Our business may be harmed if we are not successful in executing on our strategic investments and initiatives.
In 2016 we conducted a strategic review of our business operations and examined potential areas of investment and strategic emphasis. As part of our strategy, we have determined to invest in initiatives to accelerate growth in our Medicare product sales, including Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement plans. We also plan to invest resources in efforts to grow our small business group insurance business and pursue cross-selling and adjacent revenue opportunities in our Medicare and small business group business. Further, we have introduced a number of insurance benefit packages that may include a short-term health insurance product and/or other ancillary health insurance products.
Pursuing and investing in these initiatives will require significant investments in marketing and advertising, technology and product offerings, and customer care and enrollment, among others. Our pursuit of and investment in these initiatives involves risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in this Risk Factors section, including the initiatives resulting in insufficient revenue to offset any expenses associated with these new investments, inadequate return of capital on our investments, legal and regulatory compliance risks and issues not discovered in our strategic review that could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of our investments and incur unanticipated liabilities. Our pursuit of these strategic initiatives may not be successful. If we are not successful in executing on our business strategy, our future profitability would be negatively impacted and our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
Significant consolidation in the health insurance industry could alter our relationships with carriers and harm our business and financial results
The health insurance industry in the United States has experienced a substantial amount of consolidation, resulting in a decrease in the number of health insurance carriers. Consolidation in the health insurance industry could cause a loss of or changes in our relationship with carriers and reduction in our commission or other revenue, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In the future, we may be forced to offer health insurance from a reduced number of insurance carriers or to derive a greater portion of our revenue from a more concentrated number of carriers as our business and the health insurance industry evolve. Revenue derived from Humana represented approximately
23%
,
23%
and
22%
of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Revenue derived from carriers owned by UnitedHealthcare represented approximately
11%
,
13%
and
16%
of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Revenue derived from carriers owned by Aetna represented approximately
10%
,
10%
and
9%
of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. We have several agreements that govern our sale of health insurance plans with these health insurance carriers. They may be unilaterally amended or terminated by the carrier on short notice and the amendment or termination could adversely impact or cause the termination of the commission
payments that we receive from these health insurance carriers, including commissions on plans that we have already sold, which could materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Our revenue could be adversely impacted if we are unable to maintain currently-existing levels of business with any of our significant health insurance carriers if we are unable to offset any loss of business with alternative health insurance carriers. We expect that a small number of health insurance carriers will account for a significant portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future and any impairment of our relationship with, or the material financial impairment of, these health insurance carriers could adversely affect our business.
Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our financial results.
The seasonality of our business is outside of our control. For example, the health care reform open enrollment period has changed the seasonality of our individual and family health insurance business. Since the fourth quarter of 2013, we have experienced a greater number of individual and family health insurance submitted applications in the fourth quarter and first quarter and a lower number of submitted applications in the second and third quarter of the year compared to periods prior to the introduction of open enrollment periods. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the individual and family health plan annual open enrollment period for coverage effective in 2018 began on November 1, 2017 and ended on December 15, 2017, which again changed the seasonality of our individual and family business. As a result, we expect the number of applications submitted for individual and family health insurance will be higher during the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of the annual open enrollment period compared to the first, second and third quarters of 2018, outside of the annual open enrollment period. We also expect a reduction in the number of individual and family health insurance applications that are submitted through us in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the first quarter of 2017. A significant portion of our marketing and advertising expenses is driven by the number of health insurance applications submitted on our ecommerce platform. Since our marketing and advertising costs are expensed and generally paid as incurred and the cash earned from approved applications is recognized and paid as commissions are subsequently reported to us, our operating cash flows could be adversely impacted by a substantial increase in the volume of applications submitted during a quarter or positively impacted by a substantial decline in the volume of applications submitted during a quarter. During the Medicare annual enrollment period, we experience an increase in the number of submitted Medicare-related health insurance applications and marketing and advertising expenses compared to outside of Medicare annual enrollment periods. Similarly, during open enrollment periods for individual and family health insurance plans, we experience an increase in the number of submitted individual and family plan health insurance applications and marketing and advertising expenses compared to outside of open enrollment periods. The timing of open enrollment periods for individual and family health insurance and the Medicare annual enrollment period for Medicare-related health insurance affect the positive or negative impacts of our cash flows during each quarter.
In addition, the seasonality of our commission revenue will materially change effective the first quarter of 2018 as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, as discussed in
Note 1-Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Under ASU 2014-09, we expect to recognize significantly lower commission revenue in the first quarter of each year when we have historically recognized commission revenue received from Medicare-related renewals and expect to instead record significantly higher commission revenue in the fourth quarter of each year as a result of the higher volumes of approved plans we typically experience during the fourth quarter open enrollment periods.
The seasonality of our business could change in the future due to other factors, including as a result of changes in timing of the Medicare or individual and family health plan annual open enrollment periods and changes in the laws and regulations that govern the sale of health insurance. We may not be able to timely adjust to changes in the seasonality of our business. If the timing of the open enrollment periods for Medicare-related health insurance or individual and family health insurance change, we may not be able to timely adapt to changes in customer demand. If we are not successful in responding to changes in the seasonality of our business, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
Our revenue will be adversely impacted if our membership does not grow or if we are unable to retain our existing members.
Our estimated individual and family health insurance plan membership has declined substantially since the implementation of health care reform. Historically our revenue has been adversely impacted if our membership declines. We receive revenue from commissions health insurance carriers pay to us for health insurance plans sold through us. When one of these plans is canceled, or if we otherwise do not remain the agent on the policy, we no longer receive the related commission revenue. Our members may choose to discontinue their health insurance plans for a variety of reasons. For example, our members may replace a health insurance policy purchased through us with a health insurance policy provided by a new or existing employer or may determine that they can no longer afford health insurance. In addition, our members may choose to purchase new plans through other sources or use a different agent. Consumers may also purchase health insurance plans directly from government-run health insurance exchanges, including as a result of the requirement that subsidy-eligible individuals must purchase qualified health plans through government-run health insurance exchanges to be able to receive a subsidy under health care reform, and we would not remain the agent on the policy. Health insurance carriers have in the past and may in the future terminate health insurance plans purchased and held by our members. A significant number of our individual and family health insurance plan members experienced termination of their plans so that the plans were not effective in 2017. Similarly, a significant number of our individual and family health insurance plan members experienced termination of their plans so that the plans would no longer be effective in 2018. If we are not successful in transferring members covered under a terminated plan to another policy that we offer, we will lose these members and associated commission revenue. Our cost of acquiring a new member is substantially greater than the cost involved in maintaining our relationship with an existing member. If we are not able to successfully retain existing members and limit member turnover, our revenue and operating margins will be adversely impacted and our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. In addition, the Medicare-related commission rates that we receive may be higher in the first calendar year of a policy if the policy is the first Medicare-related policy issued to the member. The individual and family commission rates that we receive are typically higher in the first twelve months of a policy. After the first twelve months, they generally decline significantly. As a result, if we do not add a sufficient number of members on new plans, our revenue will be negatively impacted.
In the first quarter of 2018, we will adopt Accounting Standards Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, as discussed in
Note 1-Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Under the new standard, our revenues will be adversely impacted if we are unable to grow the number of members approved in any period. In addition, if we experience higher member turnover than we estimated when we recognized commission revenue, we may not collect all of the related commission receivable, resulting in a write-off of the remaining commission receivable balance, which would harm our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.
The medical loss ratio requirements that are a part of health care reform
may
harm our business.
The Affordable Care Act contains provisions requiring health insurance carriers to maintain specified medical loss ratios. The medical loss ratio requirements for both individual and family and small business health insurance require health insurance companies to spend 80% of their premium revenue in each of their individual and small group health insurance businesses on reimbursement for clinical services and activities that improve health care quality. The medical loss ratio requirement for Medicare Advantage plans is 85%. If a health insurance carrier fails to meet medical loss ratio requirements, the health insurance carrier is required to rebate a portion of its premium revenue to its members to make up for the difference.
Carrier reaction to the individual and family medical loss ratio requirements was to significantly reduce the commissions we receive in connection with the sale of individual and family health insurance. Health insurance carriers may determine to reduce or further reduce our Medicare Advantage plan, individual and family, or small group commissions as a result of the medical loss ratio requirements or other aspects of health care reform, including any increased expenses in complying with or dealing with the impact of health care reform, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. The implementation of medical loss ratio requirements has caused and could further cause health insurance carriers to reduce the amount they are willing to spend in connection with our sponsorship and advertising and technology licensing businesses, which also could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our business may be harmed if we lose our relationship with health insurance carriers whose Medicare-related health insurance products we sell or if our relationship with those carriers changes.
Our Medicare plan-related revenue is concentrated in a small number of health insurance carriers. The success of our Medicare-related health insurance business depends upon our ability to enter into new and maintain existing relationships with health insurance carriers on favorable economic terms. The concentration of our Medicare plan sales in a limited number of
health insurance carriers makes us vulnerable to changes in carrier commission rates and changes in the competitiveness of our carriers’ Medicare products. If our Medicare carriers reduce our commission rates, reduce the amount they pay us for advertising services, or the competitiveness of their products declines compared to original Medicare or the products of Medicare carriers with which we do not have a relationship, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
In addition, we may temporarily or permanently lose the ability to market and sell Medicare plans for our Medicare plan carriers. For instance, a carrier may terminate our relationship. Moreover, CMS heavily regulates the sale of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans and has and will continue to penalize health insurance carriers for certain regulatory violations by suspending or terminating the carrier's ability to market and sell Medicare plans for significant periods of time. CMS also may require the carrier to terminate its membership and allow its members to move to other plans. Given the concentration of our Medicare plan sales in a small number of carriers, if we lose a relationship with a health insurance carrier to market their Medicare plans temporarily or permanently or if the health insurance carrier loses its Medicare product membership, our sales as a health insurance agent and Medicare plan related revenue could be reduced significantly, and our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. The agreements that we have with health insurance carriers to sell Medicare plans may be unilaterally amended or terminated by the carrier on short notice and the amendment or termination could adversely impact, or cause the termination of, the commission payments that we receive for selling their Medicare plans, including commissions on plans that we have already sold, which could materially harm our business operating results and financial condition.
Our business may be harmed if we do not market Medicare plans effectively or if our websites and marketing materials are not timely approved.
Health insurance carriers whose Medicare plans we sell approve our websites, much of our marketing material and our call center scripts. We must receive these approvals in order for us to be able to generate Medicare plan demand and sell Medicare plans to Medicare-eligible individuals as a health insurance agent. Many of these materials also must be filed with CMS. In the event that CMS or a health insurance carrier requires change to, disapproves, or delays approval of our websites, our marketing material or call center scripts, we could lose a significant source of Medicare plan demand and our ability to sell Medicare plans would be adversely impacted, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. CMS broadened its interpretation of rules and regulations relating to Medicare plan-related marketing material so that they apply to websites that we did not previously need to submit to health insurance carriers for approval and file with CMS. This broadened interpretation also applies the same approval and filing process to marketing material of our marketing partners. If we are not successful in timely submitting these marketing materials to health insurance carriers for approval, in gaining that approval and in filing the marketing material with CMS, our Medicare plan marketing could become less effective, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If a marketing partner of ours does not consent to having its website or other marketing material filed with the CMS, does not make changes required by carriers or CMS or does not comply with the CMS marketing guidelines or other Medicare program related laws, rules and regulations, we may lose the ability to receive referrals of individuals interested in purchasing Medicare plans from that marketing partner or our ability to receive referral could be delayed and our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
If we or our marketing partners substantively change our websites or call center scripts after they are filed with CMS, we may need to resubmit them to our health insurance carriers and have them filed with CMS. We are not permitted to make CMS filings ourselves. Given the review cycles our scripts, websites and other marketing material undergo, it is very difficult and time consuming to make changes to them, and our inability to timely make changes to these marketing materials, whether to comply with new rules and regulations or otherwise could adversely impact our ability to sell Medicare plans, which could adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, if a change to scripts or websites is required by CMS or health insurance carriers, we may be prevented from using the marketing material until the change is made and approved, which would harm our business, operating results, and financial condition, particularly if it occurred during the annual enrollment period.
Our ability to sell Medicare-related health insurance plans as a health insurance agent depends upon our ability to timely hire, train and retain licensed health insurance agents for our customer care center.
In addition to our websites, we rely upon our customer care centers and outsourced call centers to sell Medicare plans. The success of our customer care center operations is largely dependent on licensed health insurance agents and other employees. In order to sell Medicare-related health insurance plans, our health insurance agent employees and contractors first be licensed by the states in which they are selling plans and certified and appointed with the health insurance carrier that offers the plans in each state that the Medicare-related health insurance product is being sold by the agent. Because a significant number of Medicare plans are sold in the fourth quarter each year during the Medicare annual enrollment period, we hire and
train a significant number of additional employees and contractors on a temporary or seasonal basis in a limited period of time. It may be difficult for the health insurance agents we employ and contract with and our systems and processes to handle the increased volume of health insurance transactions that occur in a short period of time during the Medicare annual enrollment period. We must also ensure that our health insurance agents are timely licensed in a significant number of states and certified and appointed with the health insurance carriers whose products we sell. We depend upon state departments of insurance and health insurance carriers for the licensing, certification and appointment of our health insurance agents. We may not be successful in timely hiring a sufficient number of additional licensed agents or other employees for the Medicare annual enrollment
period, and even if we are successful, the health insurance agents may experience delays in obtaining health insurance licenses and certifications and health insurance carrier appointments with our health insurance carrier partners. If we are not successful in these regards, our ability to sell Medicare-related health insurance plans will be impaired during the annual enrollment period, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our ability to sell Medicare-related health insurance plans as a health insurance agent depends upon maintenance of functioning information technology systems.
The success of our Medicare plan customer care center operations is dependent on information technology systems. The vast majority of our Medicare plan members utilize our customer care center in connection with their purchase of a Medicare plan. CMS rules require that our health insurance agent employees utilize CMS-approved scripts in connection with the sale of Medicare plans and that we record and maintain the recording of telephonic interactions relating to the sale of Medicare plans. We rely on telephone, call recording, customer relationship management and other systems and technology in our Medicare customer care center operations, and we are dependent upon third parties for some of them, including our telephone and call recording systems. These systems have failed temporarily in the past. The effectiveness and stability of our Medicare customer care center systems and technology are critical to our ability to sell Medicare plans, particularly during the Medicare annual enrollment period, and the failure or interruption of any of these systems and technology or any inability to handle increased volume during the annual enrollment period would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our success in selling Medicare-related health insurance will depend upon a number of factors some of which our outside of our control.
We determined to enter into the Medicare plan market because we believe the number of individuals becoming eligible for Medicare is increasing and these individuals are increasingly using the Internet to shop for health insurance plans. We also believe that, on average, member retention rates and the commissions that health insurance carriers pay in connection with the sale of Medicare plans compare favorably to the member retention rates and commissions we receive in connection with our sale of individual and family health insurance. Should we prove to be wrong, or should these circumstances reverse, our success in marketing Medicare plans would be materially and adversely impacted, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. For instance, CMS has in the past determined to reduce the payments it makes to health insurance carriers in connection with the sale of Medicare Advantage plans and it may do so again in the future. These reductions have caused, and could in the future cause, the cost of Medicare Advantage plans to increase or the benefits under Medicare Advantage plans to decrease, either of which would impair our ability to sell Medicare Advantage plans and our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed. They also may cause health insurance carriers to reduce our compensation, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
The majority of our Medicare-related health insurance plan sales occur over the telephone. Telephone sales of Medicare related health insurance require a licensed health insurance agent to complete and are time consuming compared to sales over the Internet. Given the resources required in connection with telephonic Medicare related health insurance sales, it may prove difficult for us to continue to grow our Medicare-related health insurance sales compared to prior periods. Even if we are able to grow those sales, it may be expensive to add the additional resources necessary for the growth. If we are not able to scalably grow our Medicare related health insurance sales over the Internet or in other ways that require fewer resources, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
Our success in the Medicare plan market as a health insurance agent will also depend upon a number of additional factors, including:
|
|
•
|
our ability to continue to adapt our ecommerce platforms to market Medicare plans, including our development or acquisition of marketing tools and features important in the sale of Medicare plans online and the effective modification of our user experience;
|
|
|
•
|
our success in marketing to Medicare-eligible individuals, including television advertising and direct mail marketing, and in entering into marketing partner relationships to drive Medicare-eligible individuals to our ecommerce platforms on a cost-effective basis;
|
|
|
•
|
our effectiveness in entering into and maintaining relationships with marketing partners that refer Medicare-eligible individuals to us;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to hire and retain additional employees with experience in Medicare, including our ability to timely implement Medicare sales expertise into our customer care centers;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to implement and maintain an effective information technology infrastructure for the sale of Medicare plans, including the infrastructure and systems that support our websites, call centers and call recording;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to leverage technology in order to sell, and otherwise become more efficient at selling, Medicare-related plans over the telephone;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to comply with the numerous, complex and changing laws and regulations and CMS guidelines relating to the marketing and sale of Medicare plans, including continuing to conform our online and offline sales processes to those laws and regulations; and
|
|
|
•
|
the effectiveness with which our competitors market the availability of Medicare plans from sources other than our ecommerce platforms.
|
As a result of these factors, we may prove unsuccessful in marketing Medicare plans and acting as a health insurance agent in connection with their sale, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, if our efforts to market Medicare plans during any annual enrollment period were impeded due to lack of health insurance carrier or CMS approval, or for other reasons, the impact on our business, operating results and financial condition would be significantly greater given the seasonality of our Medicare-related revenues, membership acquisition and expenses and the fact that much of the sales of Medicare plans occur during this period.
The marketing and sale of Medicare plans are subject to numerous, complex and frequently changing laws and regulations, and non-compliance or changes in laws and regulations could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
The marketing and sale of Medicare plans are subject to numerous laws, regulations and guidelines at the federal and state level. The marketing and sale of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans are principally regulated by CMS. The marketing and sale of Medicare Supplement plans are principally regulated on a state-by-state basis by state departments of insurance. The laws and regulations applicable to the marketing and sale of Medicare plans are numerous, ambiguous and complex, and, particularly with respect to regulations and guidance issued by CMS for Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, change frequently. The telephone calls on which we enroll individuals into Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans are required to be recorded. Health insurance carriers audit these recordings for compliance and listen to them in connection with their investigation of complaints pursuant to CMS rules and regulations. In addition, Medicare eligible individuals often receive a special election period and the ability to change Medicare Advantage and Part D prescription drug plans outside the Medicare annual enrollment period in the event the sale of the plan was not in accordance with CMS rules and guidelines. Given CMS’s scrutiny of Medicare product health insurance carriers and the responsibility of the health insurance carriers for actions that we take, health insurance carriers may terminate our relationship with them or take other corrective action if our Medicare product sales, marketing and operations are not in compliance or gives rise to too many complaints. The termination of our relationship with health insurance carriers for this reason would reduce the products we are able to offer, result in the loss of commissions for past and future sales and would otherwise harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
As a result of the laws, regulations and guidelines relating to the sale of Medicare plans, we have altered, and likely will have to continue to alter, our websites and sales process to comply with several requirements that are not applicable to our sale of non-Medicare-related health insurance plans. For instance, many aspects of our online platforms and our marketing material and processes, as well as changes to these platforms, materials and processes, including call center scripts, must be filed on a regular basis with CMS and reviewed and approved by health insurance carriers in light of CMS requirements. In addition, certain aspects of our Medicare plan marketing partner relationships have been in the past, and will be in the future, subjected to CMS and health insurance carrier review. Changes to the laws, regulations and guidelines relating to Medicare plans, their interpretation or the manner in which they are enforced could be incompatible with these relationships, our
platforms or our sale of Medicare plans. For instance, a change in sales and marketing guidelines issued by CMS resulted in our making changes to our Medicare product sales and marketing processes during the third quarter of 2016 that impacted the effectiveness of our call center agents in converting leads into submitted applications. In February 2015 CMS issued guidance indicating that third party websites and marketing material must be filed with CMS. Health insurance carriers have interpreted this guidance to mean that certain websites and marketing material of our marketing partners must go through the process of CMS filing and review and approval by health insurance carriers. Our marketing partners may not consent to having their websites or other marketing material filed with CMS. In addition, we have a number of marketing partners who refer leads to us for Medicare-related health insurance products. Given the resources and review required of us and health insurance carriers prior to CMS filing, it is unlikely that we will be able to have all of our marketing partner websites and material filed with CMS, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Even for our marketing partner websites and marketing material that are filed with CMS, they may not make it through the review process in time for the Medicare annual enrollment period. Moreover, under CMS guidance, websites and marketing material must be refiled with CMS if changed, which makes it difficult to adapt and optimize our own websites and marketing material as well as our marketing partner websites and marketing material in a short amount of time and could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Due to changes in CMS guidance or enforcement or interpretation of existing guidance applicable to our marketing and sale of Medicare products, or as a result of new laws, regulations and guidelines, CMS, state departments of insurance or health insurance carriers may determine to object to or not to approve aspects of our online platforms or marketing material and processes and may determine that certain existing aspects of our Medicare-related business are not in compliance. As a result, the progress of our Medicare operations could be slowed or we could be prevented from operating aspects of our Medicare revenue generating activities altogether, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition, particularly if it occurred during the Medicare annual enrollment period.
CMS has adopted rules relating to the timing and nature of the compensation of agents in connection with the sale of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans that have reduced our compensation as a health insurance agent in connection with the sale of these plans or had other adverse consequences. In the event CMS adopts regulations that have the effect of reducing the compensation that we receive in connection with the sale of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. In the event the actions of the federal government, state governments or other circumstances decrease the demand for the Medicare related health insurance that we sell, or result in a reduction in the amount paid to us or impact the timing of our revenue recognition in connection with the sale of these plans, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against current and future competitors.
The market for selling health insurance plans is highly competitive. We compete with entities and individuals that offer and sell health insurance plans utilizing traditional distribution channels as well as the Internet. Our competitors include local insurance agents across the United States who sell health insurance plans in their communities. There also are a number of companies that operate websites, provide an online shopping experience for consumers interested in purchasing health insurance and act as a health insurance agent in connection with that purchase. Some local agents also use Internet advertising and “lead aggregator” services that use the Internet to find consumers interested in purchasing health insurance and are compensated for referring those consumers to health insurance agents or carriers. Many health insurance carriers also directly market and sell their plans to consumers through call centers, Internet advertising and their own websites. Although we offer health insurance plans for many of these carriers, they also compete with us by offering their plans directly to consumers. In connection with our marketing of Medicare plans, we compete with the original Medicare program. CMS also offers plan information, comparison tools, call centers and online enrollment for Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. We compete with the FFM and state health insurance exchanges implemented as a result of health care reform in marketing individual and family health insurance products. Health care reform also has resulted in health insurance plan cost and benefit data being more readily accessible, which has facilitated additional competition.
To remain competitive against our current and future competitors, we will need to market our services effectively and continue to improve the online shopping experience and functionalities of our website and other platforms that our current and future customers may access to purchase health insurance products from us. If we cannot predict, develop and deliver the right shopping experience and functionality in a timely and cost-effective manner, or if we are not effective in cost-effectively driving a substantial number of consumers interested in purchasing health insurance to our website and customer care centers, we may not be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors and our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Some of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. As compared to us, our current and future competitors may be able to:
|
|
•
|
undertake more extensive marketing campaigns for their brands and services;
|
|
|
•
|
devote more resources to website and systems development and other aspects of their operations to comply with applicable laws, regulations and rules;
|
|
|
•
|
negotiate more favorable commission rates and commission override payments; and
|
|
|
•
|
make more attractive offers to potential employees, marketing partners and third-party service providers.
|
In addition, CMS has the ability to regulate our marketing and sale of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, and government-run health insurance exchanges, including CMS with respect to the FFM, have the ability to regulate our marketing and sale of qualified health plans under health care reform. CMS and the exchanges could impact the commissions we receive in connection with the sale of these plans and impose other restrictions and limitations that make it difficult for us to sell them. Competitive pressures may result in our experiencing increased marketing costs, decreased traffic to our website and loss of market share, or may otherwise harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If we are not successful in cost-effectively converting visitors to our website
and customer call centers
into members
for which we receive commissions, our business and operating results would be harmed.
Our growth depends in large part upon growth in our membership. The rate at which consumers visiting our ecommerce platform and customer care centers seeking to purchase health insurance are converted into paying members is a significant factor in the growth of our membership. A number of factors have influenced, and could in the future influence, the conversion rate for any given period, some of which are outside of our control. These factors include:
|
|
•
|
changes in consumer shopping behavior due to circumstances outside of our control, such as economic conditions, consumers’ ability or willingness to pay for health insurance, availability of unemployment benefits or proposed or enacted legislative or regulatory changes impacting our business, including health care reform;
|
|
|
•
|
the quality of and changes to the consumer experience on our ecommerce platform or with our customer care center;
|
|
|
•
|
regulatory requirements, including those that make the experience on our online platforms cumbersome or difficult to navigate;
|
|
|
•
|
the variety, competitiveness and affordability of the health insurance plans that we offer;
|
|
|
•
|
system failures or interruptions in the operation of our ecommerce platform or call center operations;
|
|
|
•
|
changes in the mix of consumers who are referred to us through our direct, marketing partner and online advertising member acquisition channels;
|
|
|
•
|
health insurance carriers offering the health insurance plans for which consumers have expressed interest, and the degree to which our technology is integrated with those carriers;
|
|
|
•
|
health insurance carrier guidelines applicable to applications submitted by consumers, the amount of time a carrier takes to make a decision on that application and the percentage of submitted applications approved by health insurance carriers;
|
|
|
•
|
the percentage of our members who did not accept their approved policies and from whom we do not receive commission payments; and
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to enroll subsidy-eligible individuals in qualified health plans through government-run health insurance exchanges and the efficacy of the process we are required to use to do so.
|
Our conversion rates can be impacted by changes in the mix of consumers referred to us through our member acquisition channels. We may make changes to our ecommerce platforms in response to regulatory requirements or undertake other initiatives in an attempt to improve consumer experience or for other reasons. These changes have in the past, and may in the future have the unintended consequence of adversely impacting our conversion rates. A decline in the percentage of consumers who submit health insurance applications on our ecommerce platforms or telephonically via our customer care centers and are converted into members could cause an increase in our cost of acquiring members on a per member basis. To the extent the rate at which we convert consumers visiting our ecommerce platforms or telephonically via our customer care centers into members suffers, or in the event the number of mobile and tablet visitors to our platforms continue to increase, our membership may decline, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our conversion rates are also impacted by changes in both the percentage of submitted applications that are approved by carriers as well as changes in the percentage of our members who do not accept their approved policies. Any decline in the percentage of submitted applications that result in paying members will adversely impact our commission revenue as well as our membership, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Given that individual and family health insurance purchasing is concentrated during the annual open enrollment period, we may experience a shift in the mix of individual and family health insurance products selected by our new members over a short period of time. Any reduction in our average commission revenue per member during the open enrollment period caused by such a shift or otherwise would also harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Changes in the variety, quality and affordability of the health insurance plans that carriers offer on our ecommerce platforms could harm our business and operating results.
The demand for health insurance marketed through our ecommerce platforms is impacted by, among other things, the variety, quality and price of the health insurance plans we offer. Many health insurance carriers, including major national health insurance carriers, have exited a large number of state insurance markets where we have historically represented their insurance plans or determined to pay reduced or no commissions for the sale of their plans. We have determined not to sell health insurance products for which we do not receive commissions. As a result of these circumstances, the number of individual and family health insurance plans we offer to sell on our website has reduced significantly and there are many states and zip codes we do not offer any individual and family health insurance. This reduction in supply has adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, demand for the individual and family health insurance we sell. If our ability to sell a variety of high-quality, affordable health insurance plans in the Medicare, individual and family, small business and ancillary product markets is impaired, or our health insurance plan offerings are limited or terminated as a result of consolidation in the health insurance industry, health care reform or otherwise, our sales or average commission rate per member may decrease and our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed. In addition, the cost of health insurance has increased substantially in many states as a result of health care reform implementation, which has reduced demand for individual and family health insurance. To the extent these conditions persist or worsen, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
If we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand, our business and operating results will be harmed.
We believe that maintaining and enhancing our brand identity is critical to our relationships with existing members, marketing partners and health insurance carriers and to our ability to attract new members, marketing partners and health insurance carriers. The promotion of our brand in these and other ways may require us to make substantial investments and we anticipate that, as our market becomes increasingly competitive, these branding initiatives may become increasingly difficult and expensive. Our brand promotion activities may not be successful or yield increased revenue, and to the extent that these activities yield increased revenue, the increased revenue may not offset the expenses we incur and our operating results could be harmed. If we do not successfully maintain and enhance our brand, our business may not grow and we could lose our relationships with health insurance carriers, marketing partners and/or members, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition, we have historically received media attention in connection with our public relations efforts. While we cannot be certain of the impact of media coverage on our business, if it were to be reduced or if we were to receive negative publicity, the number of consumers visiting our platforms or customer call centers could decrease, and our cost of acquiring members could increase as a result of a reduction in the number of members coming from our direct member acquisition channel, both of which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our future operating results are likely to fluctuate and could fall short of expectations.
Our operating results are likely to fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, including the factors described elsewhere in this Risk Factors section, many of which are outside of our control. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance, particularly in light of the fact that our business and industry are undergoing substantial change as a result of health care reform and initiatives we determined to pursue. If our revenue or operating results differ from our guidance or fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. In the past, when our revenue and operating results differed from our guidance and the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock was impacted.
A large majority of our revenue is commission revenue that we receive after an individual submits an application through us. A significant component of our marketing and advertising expenses consists of expenses incurred in search engine advertising at the time a consumer clicks on an advertisement, payments owed to our marketing partners as a result of applications submitted through us and direct advertising programs such as television advertising and direct marketing. Historically, as a result of the timing difference between expense and associated revenue recognition, our operating results and cash flows have been adversely affected in periods where we experienced a significant increase in new applicants. For example, the Medicare annual enrollment period and the implementation of health care reform open enrollment periods for individual and family health insurance have in the past caused a substantial number of health insurance applications to be submitted through us in a short period of time and a substantial increase in marketing and advertising expenses. Because commission revenue related to any submitted applications that result in paying members was not recognized until future periods, the marketing and advertising expense associated with the submitted applications had a negative impact on operating results and cash flows in the period in which the submitted applications were received.
In the first quarter of 2018, we will adopt Accounting Standards Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, as discussed in
Note 1-Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The adoption will result in a significant change to the scope and timing of our revenue recognition. As a result, we expect a substantial reduction in the timing difference between expense and associated revenue recognition in accordance with this new guidance and, as a result, better matching of the expense and the related revenue generated by our operating activities. However, due to commissions still being paid to us over time, this timing difference could have a negative impact on cash flows in periods where we experience a significant increase in new applicants or otherwise harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
System failures or capacity constraints could harm our business and operating results.
The performance, reliability and availability of our ecommerce platforms and underlying network infrastructures are critical to our financial results, our brand and our relationship with members, marketing partners and health insurance carriers. Although we regularly attempt to enhance our ecommerce platform and system infrastructure, system failures and interruptions may occur if we are unsuccessful in these efforts, if we are unable to accurately project the rate or timing of increases in our website traffic or for other reasons, some of which are completely outside our control. Although we have experienced only minor system failures and interruptions to date, we could experience significant failures and interruptions in the future, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If these failures or interruptions occurred during the Medicare annual enrollment period or during the open enrollment period under health care reform, the negative impact on us would be particularly pronounced.
We rely in part upon third-party vendors, including data center and bandwidth providers, to operate our ecommerce platforms. We cannot predict whether additional network capacity will be available from these vendors as we need it, and our network or our suppliers’ networks might be unable to achieve or maintain a sufficiently high capacity of data transmission to allow us to process health insurance applications in a timely manner or effectively download data, especially if our website traffic increases. Any system failure that causes an interruption in or decreases the responsiveness of our services would impair our revenue-generating capabilities and harm our business and operating results and damage our reputation. In addition, any loss of data could result in loss of customers and subject us to potential liability. Our database and systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from human error, fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, acts of terrorism, other attempts to harm our systems and similar events. In addition, our operations are vulnerable to earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area and elsewhere in Northern California.
Consumers may access our customer care centers for assistance in connection with submitting health insurance applications. We depend upon third parties, including telephone service providers and third party software providers, to operate our customer care centers. Any failure of the systems that we rely upon in the operation of our customer care centers could
negatively impact sales as well as our relationship with consumers and members, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We depend upon Internet search engines to attract a significant portion of the consumers who visit our website, and if we are unable to effectively advertise on search engines on a cost-effective basis, our business and operating results would be harmed.
We derive a significant portion of our website traffic from consumers who search for health insurance through Internet search engines, such as Google, Bing and Yahoo!. A critical factor in attracting consumers to our website is whether we are prominently displayed in response to an Internet search relating to health insurance. Search engines typically provide two types of search results, algorithmic listings and paid advertisements. We rely on both to attract consumers to our websites.
Algorithmic search result listings are determined and displayed in accordance with a set of formulas or algorithms developed by the particular Internet search engine. The algorithms determine the order of the listing of results in response to the consumer’s Internet search. From time to time, search engines revise these algorithms. In some instances, these modifications have caused our website to be listed less prominently in algorithmic search results, which has resulted in decreased traffic to our website. We may also be listed less prominently as a result of new websites or changes to existing websites that result in these websites receiving higher algorithmic rankings with the search engine. For example, government health insurance exchange websites appear prominently in algorithmic search results. Our website may become listed less prominently in algorithmic search results for other reasons, such as search engine technical difficulties, search engine technical changes and changes we make to our website. In addition, search engines have deemed the practices of some companies to be inconsistent with search engine guidelines and decided not to list their website in search result listings at all. If we are listed less prominently in, or removed altogether from, search result listings for any reason, the traffic to our websites would decline and we may not be able to replace this traffic, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we decide to attempt to replace this traffic, we may be required to increase our marketing expenditures, which would also increase our cost of member acquisition and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We purchase paid advertisements on search engines in order to attract consumers to our website. We typically pay a search engine for prominent placement of our website when particular health insurance-related terms are searched for on the search engine, regardless of the algorithmic search result listings. The prominence of the placement of our advertisement is determined by a combination of factors, including the amount we are willing to pay and algorithms designed to determine the relevance of our paid advertisement to a particular search term. As with algorithmic search result listings, search engines may revise the algorithms relevant to paid advertisements and websites other than our ecommerce platform may become more optimized for the algorithms. These changes may result in our having to pay increased amounts to maintain our paid advertisement placement in response to a particular search term. We could also have to pay increased amounts should the market share of major search engines continue to become more concentrated with a single search engine. Additionally, we bid against our competitors and others for the display of these paid search engine advertisements. Many of our competitors, including many health insurance carriers and government-run health insurance exchanges, have greater resources with which to bid and better brand recognition than we do. We have experienced increased competition from health insurance carriers, government health insurance exchanges and some of our marketing partners for both algorithmic search result listings and for paid advertisements. The competition has increased the cost of paid internet search advertising and has increased our marketing and advertising expenses. The competition increases substantially during the open enrollment periods for individual and family health insurance and Medicare related health insurance. If paid search advertising costs increase or become cost prohibitive, whether as a results of competition, algorithm changes or otherwise our advertising expenses could rise significantly or we could reduce or discontinue our paid search advertisements, either of which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We rely significantly on marketing partners and our business and operating results would be harmed if we are unable to maintain effective relationships with our existing marketing partners or if we do not establish successful relationships with new marketing partners.
In addition to marketing through Internet search engines, we frequently enter into contractual marketing relationships with other online and offline businesses that promote us. These marketing partners include financial and online service companies, affiliate programs and online advertisers and content providers. We also have relationships with marketing partners, including pharmacy chains that promote our Medicare platforms to their customers. We compensate many of our marketing partners for their referrals on a submitted health insurance application basis and, if they are licensed to sell health insurance, may share a percentage of the commission we earn from the health insurance carrier for each member referred by the marketing partner.
Many factors influence the success of our relationship with our marketing partners, including:
|
|
•
|
the continued positive market presence, reputation and growth of the marketing partner;
|
|
|
•
|
the effectiveness of the marketing partner in marketing our website and services, including whether the marketing partner is successful in maintaining the prominence of its website in algorithmic search result listings and paid Internet advertisements;
|
|
|
•
|
the compliance of our marketing partners, and of the manner marketing partners refer consumers to our platforms, with applicable laws, regulations and guidelines;
|
|
|
•
|
the interest of the marketing partner’s customers in the health insurance plans that we offer on our ecommerce platform;
|
|
|
•
|
the contractual terms we negotiate with the marketing partner, including the marketing fees we agree to pay a marketing partner;
|
|
|
•
|
the percentage of the marketing partner’s customers that submit applications or purchase health insurance policies through our ecommerce platform;
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of a marketing partner to maintain efficient and uninterrupted operation of its website; and
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to work with the marketing partner to implement website changes, launch marketing campaigns and pursue other initiatives necessary to maintain positive consumer experiences and acceptable traffic volumes.
|
For instance, we partner with Internet lead aggregators who refer a significant number of consumers to our online platforms. Major search engines have in the past and may in the future determine not to list lead aggregator websites prominently in search result listings for various reasons, which would cause a significant reduction in the number of consumers referred to us through our marketing partner channel. While we have relationships with a large number of marketing partners, we depend upon referrals from a limited number of marketing partners for a significant portion of the submitted applications we receive from our marketing partner customer acquisition channel.
Given our reliance on our marketing partners, our business operating results and financial condition would be harmed if any of the following were to occur:
|
|
•
|
if we are unable to maintain successful relationships with our existing marketing partners, particularly marketing partners responsible for a significant number of our submitted applications;
|
|
|
•
|
if we fail to establish successful relationships with new marketing partners;
|
|
|
•
|
if we experience competition in our receipt of referrals from our high volume marketing partners; and
|
|
|
•
|
if we are required to pay increased amounts to our marketing partners.
|
To the extent that health care reform makes it less profitable or desirable for marketing partners to promote us to their customers, we may lose relationships with existing marketing partners or those marketing partners may refer fewer individuals to us. We may also have difficulty entering into relationships with new marketing partners. Competition for referrals from our marketing partners has increased particularly during the open enrollment periods for Medicare-related health insurance and individual and family health insurance. We may lose marketing partner referrals if our competitors pay marketing partners more than we do or be forced to pay increased fees to our marketing partners, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we lose marketing partner referrals during the Medicare or individual and family health insurance annual open enrollment periods, the adverse impact on our business would be particularly pronounced. In addition, the promulgation of laws, regulations or guidelines, or the interpretation of existing laws, regulations and guidelines, by state departments of insurance or by CMS, could cause our relationships with our marketing partners to be in non-compliance with those laws, regulations and guidelines. In addition, we have relationships with hospitals and pharmacy chains that utilize aspects of our platform and tools. Our relationships with these hospitals and pharmacy chains result in the referral of a significant number of individuals to us who are interested in purchasing Medicare-related health insurance plans. If CMS or state departments of insurance were to change existing laws, regulations or guidelines, or interpret existing laws, regulations or guidelines, to prohibit these arrangements, or if hospitals or pharmacy partners otherwise decided to no longer utilize aspects of
our platform and tools, we could experience a significant decline in the number of Medicare-eligible individuals who are referred to our platforms and customer care centers, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We rely on health insurance carriers to accurately and regularly prepare commission reports, and if these reports are inaccurate or not sent to us in a timely manner, our business and operating results could be harmed. We also may not recognize trends in our membership as a result of a lack of information from health insurance carriers.
We rely on health insurance carriers to timely and accurately report the amount of commissions earned by us, and we calculate our commission revenue, prepare our financial reports, projections and budgets and direct our marketing and other operating efforts based on the reports we receive from health insurance carriers. There have been instances where we have determined that policy cancellation data reported to us by a health insurance carrier has not been accurate. Although we recognize commissions reported to us net of estimated cancellations, the extent to which health insurance carriers are inaccurate in their reporting of policy cancellations could cause us to change our cancellation estimates, which could adversely impact our revenues. We apply judgment and make estimates based on historical data and current trends to independently determine whether or not carriers are accurately reporting commissions due to us. Historically, to the extent that health insurance carriers understated or failed to accurately report the amount of commissions due to us in a timely manner or at all, we were unable to recognize revenue to which we were entitled, which harmed our business, operating results and financial condition. Our recognition of revenue will change in the first quarter of 2018 as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, as discussed in
Note 1-Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Prospectively, to the extent that health insurance carriers understate or fail to accurately report the amount of commissions due to us in a timely manner or at all, we would collect a lower amount of commissions than revenue we recognized upon the carrier's approval of the policy, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We depend on health insurance carriers and others for data related to our membership. For instance, with respect to health insurance plans other than small business health insurance, health insurance carriers do not directly report member cancellations to us, resulting in the need for us to determine cancellations using payment data that carriers provide. We infer cancellations from this payment data by analyzing whether payments from members have ceased for a period of time, and we may not learn of a cancellation for several months. With respect to our small business membership, many groups notify the carrier directly with respect to increases or decreases in group size and policy cancellations. Our insurance carrier partners often do not communicate this information to us, and it often takes a significant amount of time for us to learn about small business group cancellations and changes in our membership within the group itself. We often are not made aware of policy cancellations until the time of the group’s annual renewal.
A substantial number of our existing members may become eligible for health care reform subsidies in connection with their purchase of health insurance. In addition, the open enrollment periods applicable in connection with the sale of both individual and family health insurance and Medicare-related health insurance condenses purchasing activity over a limited period of time. The increased amount of health insurance purchasing activity and member movement as a result of health care reform over a limited period of time as well as any member turnover that we experience may make it difficult for health insurance carriers to accurately report commission information to us in a timely manner, which would also make it difficult or impossible for us to accurately report and estimate our membership at any given point in time. In addition, if we experience a disruption in our ability to accurately estimate our membership it could result in a decrease in our stock price as a result of uncertainty relating to our membership base.
After we have estimated membership for a period, we may receive information from health insurance carriers that would have impacted the estimate if we had received the information prior to the date of estimation. We may receive commission payments or other information that indicates that a member who was not included in our estimates for a prior period was in fact an active member at that time, or that a member who was included in our estimates was in fact not an active member of ours. We also reconcile information health insurance carriers provide to us and may determine that we were not historically paid commissions owed to us, which would cause us to have underestimated our membership. As a result of open enrollment periods, we may not receive information from our carriers on as timely a basis due to significant spikes in volume, which could impair the accuracy of our membership estimates. Additionally, health insurance carriers may require us to return commission payments paid in a prior period due to policy cancellations for members we previously estimated as being active. For these and other reasons, including if current trends in membership cancellation are inconsistent with past cancellation trends that we use to estimate our membership or if carriers subsequently report changes to the commission payments that they previously reported to us, our actual membership could be different from our estimates, perhaps materially. Total revenue per estimated member for the period would also change if our estimated membership changed. Our estimate regarding the average amount of time our members maintain their health insurance plans also could be inaccurate as it depends on the accuracy of our membership estimates.
Our business is subject to security risks and, if we are unable to safeguard the security and privacy of confidential data, including personal health information, our business will be harmed.
Our services involve the collection and storage of confidential information of consumers and the transmission of this information to their chosen health insurance carriers and to government. For example, we collect names, addresses, Social Security and credit card numbers, and information regarding the medical history of consumers. As a result, we are subject to various laws and regulations and contractual requirements regarding the collection, maintenance, protection, use, transmission, disclosure and disposal of sensitive personal information. We cannot guarantee that our facilities and systems, and those of our third party service providers, will be free of security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. Compliance with privacy and security laws, requirements and regulations may result in cost increases due to new constraints on our business, the development of new processes, the effects of potential non-compliance by us or third party service providers, and enforcement actions. We may be required to expend significant amounts and other resources to protect against security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by security breaches. Despite our implementation of security measures, techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Additionally, our third party service providers may cause security breaches for which we are responsible.
Any compromise or perceived compromise of our security by us or by one of our vendors could damage our reputation, cause the termination of relationships with government-run health insurance exchanges and our members, marketing partners and health insurance carriers, reduce demand for our services and subject us to significant liability and expense as well as regulatory action and lawsuits, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, in the event that additional data security laws are implemented, or our health insurance carrier or other partners determine to impose requirements on us relating to data security, we may not be able to timely comply with such requirements or such requirements may not be compatible with our current processes. Changing our processes could be time consuming and expensive, and failure to timely implement required changes could result in our inability to sell health insurance plans in a particular jurisdiction or for a particular health insurance carrier or subject us to liability for non-compliance, any of which would damage our business, operating results and financial condition. For instance, health insurance carriers may require us to be compliant with Payment Card Industry, or PCI, security standards in order to accept credit card information from consumers or require us to comply with privacy and security standards to do business with us at all. PCI compliance and compliance with other privacy and security standards are regularly assessed, and we may not always be compliant with the standards. If we are not in compliance, we may not be able to accept credit card information from consumers or conduct health insurance business, and our relationship with health insurance carriers could be adversely impacted or terminated, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
There are many risks associated with our operations in China.
A portion of our operations is conducted in China. Among other things, we use employees in China to maintain and update our ecommerce platform. This and other information is delivered to us through secured communications over the Internet. Our business would be harmed if this connection temporarily failed, and we were prevented from promptly updating our software or implementing other changes to our database and systems. From time-to-time we receive inquiries from health insurance carriers relating to our operations in China and the security measures we have implemented to protect data that our employees in China may be able to access. As a part of these inquiries, we have implemented additional security measures relating to our operations in China. We may be required to implement further security measures to continue aspects of our operations in China, which could be time consuming and expensive and harm our operating results and financial condition. If we are required to move aspects of our operations from China to our offices in the United States as a result of inquiries from health insurance carriers or for other reasons, it could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Our operations in China also expose us to different and unfamiliar laws, rules and regulations, including different intellectual property laws, which are not as protective of our intellectual property as the laws in the United States, and different labor and tax laws. United States and Chinese trade laws may impose restrictions on the importation of programming or technology to or from the United States. Additionally, we have recently experienced greater competition for qualified personnel in China, which has raised market salaries and increased our compensation costs related to employees in China. If competition for personnel increases further, our compensation expenses could rise considerably or, if we determine to not increase compensation levels, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in China may be impaired, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. These risks could cause us to incur increased expenses and could harm our ability to effectively and successfully manage our operations in China, which in turn could cause our business, operating results and financial condition to suffer.
Our sponsorship and advertising business may not be successful.
We sell advertising space to health insurance carriers on our website through our sponsorship and advertising program. Our sponsorship and advertising program allows carriers to purchase advertising space in specific markets in a sponsorship area on our website. Health insurance carriers have generally determined not to spend on individual and family health insurance advertising through our sponsorship and advertising program as a result of the impact of health care reform on the profitability of their individual and family health insurance businesses. To the extent that economic conditions, health care reform or other factors impact the amount health insurance carriers are willing to pay for advertising on our ecommerce platform, our sponsorship and advertising program will be adversely impacted. Since much of our sponsorship revenue depends upon the number of applications we submit to health insurance carriers, a reduction in demand for the carrier’s product (such as outside open enrollment periods) would reduce our sponsorship revenue and our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed. The success of our sponsorship and advertising program depends on a number of other factors, including the effectiveness of the sponsorship and advertising program as a cost-effective method for carriers to obtain additional members, consumer and health insurance carrier adoption of the Internet and our ecommerce platform as a medium for the purchase and sale of health insurance, our ability to attract consumers visiting our ecommerce platform and convert those consumers into members, the existence of a relationship between us and a diverse group of carriers that offer a number of health insurance plans in the markets in which we attempt to sell advertising, the cost, benefit and brand recognition of the health insurance plan that is the subject of the advertising, the impact the advertising has on the sale of the health insurance plan that is the subject of the advertising and the effectiveness of the carrier’s other means of advertising. In addition, while our practice of selling advertising is described on our ecommerce platform, it could cause consumers to perceive us as not objective, which could harm our brand and result in a decline in our health insurance sales. It also could adversely impact our relationship with health insurance carriers that do not purchase our advertising. As a result, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We also develop, host and maintain carrier dedicated Medicare plan websites through our advertising program. Our success in doing so is dependent upon the same factors that could impact our sponsorship program. In addition, since we maintain relationships with a limited number of health insurance carriers to sell their Medicare plans, our Medicare plan-related advertising revenue is concentrated in a small number of health insurance carriers and our ability to generate Medicare plan-related advertising revenue would be harmed by the termination or non-renewal of any of these relationships as well as by a reduction in the amount a health insurance carrier is willing to pay for these services. Moreover, in light of the regulations applicable to the marketing and sale of Medicare plans, and given that these regulations are often unclear, change frequently and are subject to changing interpretations, we may in the future not be permitted to sell Medicare plan-related advertising. If we are not successful in generating Medicare plan-related advertising revenue, our business operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm our business and operating results.
We believe that our intellectual property is an essential asset of our business and that our technology currently gives us a competitive advantage in the distribution of Medicare-related, individual and family and small business health insurance. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights in the United States. The efforts we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient or effective, and our trademarks may be held invalid or unenforceable. Moreover, the law relating to intellectual property is not as developed in China, and our intellectual property rights may not be as respected in China as they are in the United States. We may not be effective in policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property, trade secrets and other confidential information, and even if we do detect violations, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any enforcement efforts we undertake, including litigation, could be time-consuming and expensive, could divert our management’s attention and may result in a court determining that our intellectual property or other rights are unenforceable. If we are not successful in cost-effectively protecting our intellectual property rights, trade secrets and confidential information, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We may in the future be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.
There are a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets applicable to the internet and technology industries and entities frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have received, and may in the future receive, notices that claim we have misappropriated, infringed or misused other parties’ intellectual property rights, and, to the extent we gain greater visibility, we face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims. There may be third-party intellectual property rights, including issued or pending patents that cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods or that cover third-party technology that we use as a part of our websites. Any intellectual property claim against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming, expensive to settle or litigate and could divert our management’s attention and other resources. These claims also could subject us to significant liability for damages and could result in our having to stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We might be required to seek a license for third-party intellectual property, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Even if a license is available, we could be required to pay significant royalties, which would increase our operating expenses. We may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit our services and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Any legal liability, regulatory penalties, or negative publicity for the information on our website or that we otherwise provide could harm our business and operating results.
We provide information on our website, through our customer care centers and in other ways regarding health insurance in general and the health insurance plans we market and sell, including information relating to insurance premiums, coverage, benefits, provider networks, exclusions, limitations, availability, plan comparisons and insurance company ratings. A significant amount of both automated and manual effort is required to maintain the considerable amount of insurance plan information on our website. Separately, from time to time, we use the information provided on our website and otherwise collected by us to publish reports designed to educate consumers, facilitate public debate, and facilitate reform at the state and federal level. If the information we provide on our website, through our customer care centers or otherwise is not accurate or is construed as misleading, or if we do not properly assist individuals and businesses in purchasing health insurance, members, health insurance carriers and others could attempt to hold us liable for damages, our relationships with health insurance carriers could be terminated or impaired and regulators could attempt to subject us to penalties, revoke our licenses to transact health insurance business in a particular jurisdiction, and/or compromise the status of our licenses to transact health insurance business in other jurisdictions, which could result in our loss of our commission revenue. In the ordinary course of operating our business, we have received complaints that the information we provided was not accurate or was misleading. Although in the past we have resolved these complaints without significant financial cost, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so in the future. In addition, these types of claims could be time-consuming and expensive to defend, could divert our management’s attention and other resources, and could cause a loss of confidence in our services. As a result, whether or not we are able to successfully resolve these claims, they could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
In the ordinary course of our business, we have received and may continue to receive inquiries from state regulators relating to various matters. We also have become, and may in the future become, involved in litigation in the ordinary course of our business. If we are found to have violated laws or regulations, we could lose our relationship with health insurance carriers and be subject to various fines and penalties, including revocation of our licenses to sell insurance which would cause us to lose our commission revenue, and our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially harmed. In addition, if regulators believe our websites are not compliant with applicable laws or regulations, we could be forced to stop using our websites or certain aspects of them until the issue is resolved, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Acquisitions could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and operating results
.
We may decide to acquire businesses, products and technologies. Our ability as an organization to successfully make and integrate acquisitions is unproven. Acquisitions could require significant capital infusions and could involve many risks, including the following:
|
|
•
|
an acquisition may negatively impact our results of operations because it will require us to incur transaction expenses, and after the transaction, may require us to incur charges and substantial debt or liabilities, may require the amortization, write down or impairment of amounts related to deferred compensation, goodwill and other
|
intangible assets, or may cause adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation or deferred compensation charges;
|
|
•
|
an acquisition undertaken for strategic business purposes may negatively impact our results of operations;
|
|
|
•
|
we may encounter difficulties in assimilating and integrating the business, technologies, products, personnel or operations of companies that we acquire, particularly if key personnel of the acquired company decide not to work for us;
|
|
|
•
|
an acquisition may disrupt our ongoing business, divert resources, increase our expenses and distract our management;
|
|
|
•
|
we may be required to implement or improve internal controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a public company at a business that prior to the acquisition lacked these controls, procedures and policies;
|
|
|
•
|
the acquired businesses, products or technologies may not generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition costs or to maintain our financial results;
|
|
|
•
|
we may have to issue equity securities to complete an acquisition, which would dilute our stockholders’ ownership and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock; and
|
|
|
•
|
acquisitions may involve the entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience.
|
We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify or consummate any future acquisition on favorable terms, or at all. If we do pursue an acquisition, it is possible that we may not realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition or that the financial markets or investors will negatively view the acquisition. Even if we successfully complete an acquisition, it could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
As part of our initiative to expand our presence in the Medicare supplement market, we acquired Wealth, Health and Life Advisors, LLC (d/b/a GoMedigap) in January 2018. We may not be able to realize anticipated synergies and opportunities as a result of the acquisition, and the business may not perform as planned as a result of many of the risks and uncertainties that apply to the rest of our business. We may also encounter difficulties in integrating GoMedigap into our existing business. If anticipated synergies and opportunities are not realized, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements could be impaired, which could adversely affect our operating results, our ability to operate our business and our stock price.
We have a complex business organization. Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place to help ensure that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently and is complicated by the expansion of our business operations. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors or all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Over time, controls may become inadequate because changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may occur. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We cannot assure that significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in their implementation, could result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, cause us to fail to timely meet our periodic reporting obligations, or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual auditor attestation reports regarding disclosure controls and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder. The existence of a material weakness could result in errors in our financial statements that could result
in a restatement of financial statements, cause us to fail to timely meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, leading to a decline in our stock price and potential lawsuits against us.
Changes in our provision for income taxes or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or other tax returns could adversely affect our results.
Our provision for income taxes is subject to volatility and could be adversely affected by earnings differing materially from our projections, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, expiration of or lapses in the research and development tax credit laws, tax effects of share-based compensation, outcomes as a result of tax examinations or by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles, including accounting for uncertain tax positions, or interpretations thereof.
Our deferred tax assets remain available for use in future periods and will reduce our tax provision if taxable income is generated. To the extent that our provision for income taxes is subject to volatility or adverse outcomes as a result of tax examinations, our operating results could be harmed. Significant judgment is required to determine the recognition and measurement attribute prescribed in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) relating to accounting for income taxes. In addition, U.S. GAAP applies to all income tax positions, including the potential recovery of previously paid taxes, which if settled unfavorably could adversely impact our provision for income taxes or additional paid-in capital. In addition, we are subject to examinations of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There may be exposure that the outcomes from these examinations will have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the “Jobs Act”, was signed into law resulting in significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Jobs Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, changes U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and implements a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. While we are able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in corporate rates and other changes, the final impact of the Jobs Act may differ from these estimates, as a result of, among other things, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, additional guidance that may be issued by the internal revenue service and resulting actions we may take.
Regulation of the sale of health insurance is subject to change, and future regulations could harm our business and operating results.
The laws and regulations governing the offer, sale and purchase of health insurance are subject to change, and future changes may be adverse to our business. For example, a long standing provision in each state’s law that we believe is advantageous to our business is that once health insurance premiums are set by the carrier and approved by state regulators, they are fixed and not generally subject to negotiation or discounting by insurance companies or agents. Additionally, state regulations generally prohibit carriers, agents and brokers from providing financial incentives, such as rebates, to their members in connection with the sale of health insurance. As a result, we do not currently compete with carriers or other agents and brokers on the price of the health insurance plans offered on our website. If these regulations change, we could be forced to reduce prices or provide rebates or other incentives for the health insurance plans sold through our ecommerce platform, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
States have, and will continue, to adopt new laws and regulations in response to health care reform legislation. It is difficult to predict how these new laws and regulations will impact our business, but in some cases such laws and regulations could amplify the adverse impacts of health care reform, or states may adopt new requirements that adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition. For example, we believe that certain states are contemplating rules and regulations that would apply certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act to short-term health insurance, such as the essential health benefits or requiring that short-term health insurance cover pre-existing conditions. Rules and regulations such as these could adversely impact our sale of short term health insurance for several reasons, including because carriers may determine it is not profitable to sell the plans or carriers may increase plan premiums to a degree that reduces consumer demand for them. Moreover, our sales outside of the health care reform open enrollment period could decline, because many individuals and families choose to purchase short term health insurance outside of the open enrollment period given the unavailability if major medical individual and family health insurance to them. In the event, laws, regulations or rules are adopted that adversely impact our sale of short term health insurance, they could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are also subject to additional insurance regulatory risks, because we use the Internet as a distribution platform. In many cases, it is not clear how existing insurance laws and regulations apply to Internet-related health insurance advertisements and transactions. To the extent that new laws or regulations are adopted that conflict with the way we conduct our business, or to the extent that existing laws and regulations are interpreted adversely to us, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
If we fail to comply with the numerous
state
laws and regulations that are applicable to the sale of health insurance, our business and operating results
could be harmed.
The sale of health insurance is heavily regulated by each state in the United States. For instance, in addition to the impact and changes in regulations resulting from health care reform, state regulators require us to maintain a valid license in each state in which we transact health insurance business and further require that we adhere to sales, documentation and administration practices specific to that state. In addition, each employee who transacts health insurance business on our behalf must maintain a valid license in one or more states. Because we do business in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, compliance with health insurance-related laws, rules and regulations is difficult and imposes significant costs on our business. Each jurisdiction’s insurance department typically has the power, among other things, to:
|
|
•
|
grant and revoke licenses to transact insurance business;
|
|
|
•
|
conduct inquiries into the insurance-related activities and conduct of agents and agencies;
|
|
|
•
|
require and regulate disclosure in connection with the sale and solicitation of health insurance;
|
|
|
•
|
authorize how, by which personnel and under what circumstances insurance premiums can be quoted and published and an insurance policy sold;
|
|
|
•
|
approve which entities can be paid commissions from carriers and the circumstances under which they may be paid;
|
|
|
•
|
regulate the content of insurance-related advertisements, including web pages, and other marketing practices;
|
|
|
•
|
approve policy forms, require specific benefits and benefit levels and regulate premium rates;
|
|
|
•
|
impose fines and other penalties; and
|
|
|
•
|
impose continuing education requirements.
|
Due to the complexity, periodic modification and differing interpretations of insurance laws and regulations, we may not have always been, and we may not always be, in compliance with them. New insurance laws, regulations and guidelines also may not be compatible with the sale of health insurance over the Internet or with various aspects of our platform or manner of marketing or selling health insurance plans. Failure to comply with insurance laws, regulations and guidelines or other laws and regulations applicable to our business could result in significant liability, additional department of insurance licensing requirements, the revocation of licenses in a particular jurisdiction and/or our inability to sell health insurance plans, which could significantly increase our operating expenses, result in the loss of our commission revenue and otherwise harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, an adverse regulatory action in one jurisdiction could result in penalties and adversely affect our license status or reputation in other jurisdictions due to the requirement that adverse regulatory actions in one jurisdiction be reported to other jurisdictions. Even if the allegations in any regulatory or other action against us are proven false, any surrounding negative publicity could harm consumer, marketing partner or health insurance carrier confidence in us, which could significantly damage our brand. Changes in insurance laws, regulations and guidelines may also be incompatible with various aspects of our business and require that we make significant modifications to our existing technology or practices, which may be costly and time-consuming to implement and could also harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition, we have received, and may in the future receive, inquiries from regulators regarding our marketing and business practices. We typically respond by explaining how we believe we are in compliance with relevant regulations or may modify our practices in connection with the inquiry. Any modification of our marketing or business practices in response to future regulatory inquiries could harm our business, operating results or financial condition.
Government regulation of the Internet could adversely affect our business.
The laws governing general commerce on the Internet remain unsettled and it may take years to fully determine whether and how existing laws such as those governing intellectual property, privacy and taxation apply to the Internet. In addition, the growth and development of the market for electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business over the Internet. Any new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations relating to the Internet could harm our business and we could be forced to incur substantial costs in order to comply with them, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our business could be harmed if we are unable to contact our consumers or market the availability of our products through specific channels.
We use email and telephone, among other channels, to market our services to potential members and as the primary means of communicating with our existing members. The laws and regulations governing the use of emails and telephone calls for marketing purposes continue to evolve, and changes in technology, the marketplace or consumer preferences may lead to the adoption of additional laws or regulations or changes in interpretation of existing laws or regulations. If new laws or regulations are adopted, or existing laws and regulations are interpreted or enforced, to impose additional restrictions on our ability to send email or telephone messages to our members or potential members, we may not be able to communicate with them in a cost-effective manner. In addition to legal restrictions on the use of email, Internet service providers, e-mail service providers and others attempt to block the transmission of unsolicited email, commonly known as “spam.” Many Internet and e-mail service providers have relationships with organizations whose purpose it is to detect and notify the Internet and e-mail service providers of entities that the organization believes is sending unsolicited e-mail. If an Internet or e-mail service provider identifies email from us as “spam” as a result of reports from these organizations or otherwise, we can be placed on a restricted list that will block our email to members or potential members. Similarly, various federal and state laws and regulations, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and its implementing regulations, restrict the telephone calls that businesses may make to consumers and increase the compliance costs for businesses making telephone calls to consumers. In addition, telephone carriers may block or put consumer warnings on calls originating from call centers. Consumers increasingly screen their incoming emails and telephone calls, including by using such tools and warnings, and therefore our members or potential members may not reliably receive our emails or telephone messages. If we are unable to communicate effectively by email or telephone with our members and potential members as a result of legislation, blockage, screening technologies or otherwise, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.
Consumers depend upon third-party service providers to access our website, and our business and operating results could be harmed as a result of technical difficulties experienced by these service providers.
Consumers using our website depend upon Internet, online and other service providers for access to our website. Many of these service providers have experienced significant outages, delays and other difficulties in the past and could experience them in the future. Any significant interruption in access to our website or increase in our website’s response time as a result of these difficulties could damage our relationship with insurance carriers, marketing partners and existing and potential members and could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Common Stock
The trading price of our common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations and volatility, and our stockholders may be unable to resell their shares at a profit.
The stock markets, in general, and the markets for high technology stocks in particular, have historically experienced high levels of volatility. The market for technology stocks has been extremely volatile and frequently reaches levels that bear no relationship to the past or present operating performance of those companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In addition, the trading price of our common stock has been subject to significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate or decline, particularly as a result of developments relating to health care reform legislation and the implementation of health care reform. Other factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
•
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
|
|
|
•
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of technology companies in general, and companies in our industry;
|
|
|
•
|
actual or anticipated changes in our results of operations or fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
•
|
actual or anticipated changes in the expectations of investors or securities analysts, including changes in financial estimates or investment recommendations by securities analysts who follow our business and changes in perceptions relating to the economy;
|
|
|
•
|
speculation in the press or investment community;
|
|
|
•
|
technological advances or introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
•
|
actual or anticipated developments in our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally;
|
|
|
•
|
litigation involving us, our industry or both;
|
|
|
•
|
actual or anticipated legal or regulatory developments in the United States or foreign countries, including health care reform legislation in the United States;
|
|
|
•
|
major catastrophic events;
|
|
|
•
|
announcements or developments relating to the economy;
|
|
|
•
|
our sale of common stock or other securities in the future;
|
|
|
•
|
the trading volume of our common stock, as well as sales of large blocks of our stock; or
|
|
|
•
|
departures of key personnel.
|
These factors, as well as general economic and political conditions and the announcement of proposed and completed acquisitions or other significant transactions, or any difficulties associated with such transactions, by us or our strategic partners, customers or our current competitors, may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock in the future. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Such litigation could result in substantial cost and a diversion of management’s attention and resources. In addition, volatility, lack of positive performance in our stock price or changes to our overall compensation program, including our equity incentive program, may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees.
Our actual operating results may differ significantly from our guidance.
From time to time, we have released, and may continue to release guidance in earnings conference calls, earnings releases, or otherwise, regarding our future performance that represents our management's estimates as of the date of release. This guidance, which includes forward-looking statements, has been and will be based on projections prepared by our management. These projections are not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our registered public accountants nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines the projections. Accordingly, no such person expresses any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect to the projections.
Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We may state possible outcomes as high and low ranges. Any range we provide is not intended to imply that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal reason that we release guidance is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors and we may decide to suspend guidance at any time. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such third parties.
Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Our actual results have, and may in the future, vary from our guidance and the variations may be material. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged not to rely upon our guidance in making an investment decision regarding our common stock.
Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth in this “Risk Factors” section in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could result in the actual operating results being different from our guidance, and the differences may be adverse and material.
A limited number of stockholders have the ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.
A small number of stockholders and their affiliated entities beneficially owned more than 50% percent of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2017. These stockholders, if they act together, could exert substantial influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors, the amendment of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their stock as part of a sale of our company and might reduce our stock price. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by other stockholders.
Certain provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage takeover attempts and lead to management entrenchment.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in our management without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include:
|
|
•
|
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;
|
|
|
•
|
cumulative voting in the election of directors is prohibited, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;
|
|
|
•
|
the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of our board of directors to determine to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquiror;
|
|
|
•
|
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;
|
|
|
•
|
the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer or the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors; and
|
|
|
•
|
advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquiror’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
|
We are also subject to certain anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law. Under Delaware law, a corporation may, in general, not engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our common stock has been quoted on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “EHTH” since our initial public offering on October 13, 2006. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our stock. As of February 28, 2018, there were 25 stockholders of record of our common stock (which does not include the number of stockholders holding shares of our common stock in “street name”) and the closing price of our common stock was $16.29 per share on February 28, 2018 as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market.
The following table sets forth for the indicated period the closing high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
First Quarter 2017
|
$
|
12.75
|
|
|
$
|
10.33
|
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
$
|
19.53
|
|
|
$
|
10.41
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
$
|
25.65
|
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
$
|
28.59
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
Year 2017
|
$
|
28.59
|
|
|
$
|
10.33
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
First Quarter 2016
|
$
|
10.96
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
Second Quarter 2016
|
$
|
15.14
|
|
|
$
|
8.45
|
|
Third Quarter 2016
|
$
|
14.39
|
|
|
$
|
8.98
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2016
|
$
|
11.61
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
Year 2016
|
$
|
15.14
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our common stock. We currently do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we did not issue or sell any shares of our common stock or other equity securities pursuant to unregistered transactions in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” for information regarding securities authorized for issuance.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our common stock during the year and quarter ended December 31, 2017.
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following information relating to the price performance of our common stock shall not be deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or “soliciting material” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to liabilities under Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference.
The graph below matches our cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative 5-year total returns on the NASDAQ Composite index and the Research Data Group (“RDG”) Internet Composite index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2012
|
|
12/31/2013
|
|
12/31/2014
|
|
12/31/2015
|
|
12/31/2016
|
|
12/31/2017
|
eHealth, Inc.
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
103.31
|
|
|
$
|
97.82
|
|
|
$
|
74.26
|
|
|
$
|
105.57
|
|
|
$
|
76.01
|
|
NADAQ Composite
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
130.61
|
|
|
$
|
147.52
|
|
|
$
|
146.84
|
|
|
$
|
178.69
|
|
|
$
|
235.59
|
|
RDG Internet Composite
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
163.02
|
|
|
$
|
158.81
|
|
|
$
|
224.05
|
|
|
$
|
235.33
|
|
|
$
|
338.52
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission
|
$
|
153,383
|
|
|
$
|
158,626
|
|
|
$
|
171,257
|
|
|
$
|
170,850
|
|
|
$
|
158,424
|
|
Other
|
25,797
|
|
|
21,051
|
|
|
18,284
|
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
13,931
|
|
Total revenue
|
179,180
|
|
|
179,677
|
|
|
189,541
|
|
|
186,960
|
|
|
172,355
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
5,461
|
|
|
4,494
|
|
|
4,178
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Marketing and advertising
(1)
|
71,660
|
|
|
69,732
|
|
|
75,571
|
|
|
72,213
|
|
|
65,874
|
|
Customer care and enrollment
(1)
|
35,099
|
|
|
42,745
|
|
|
42,540
|
|
|
47,930
|
|
|
59,183
|
|
Technology and content
(1)
|
32,579
|
|
|
40,390
|
|
|
36,351
|
|
|
32,749
|
|
|
32,889
|
|
General and administrative
(1)
|
29,235
|
|
|
27,549
|
|
|
30,858
|
|
|
36,004
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
Acquisition costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
621
|
|
Restructuring
(1)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
1,414
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
175,448
|
|
|
186,439
|
|
|
195,192
|
|
|
192,815
|
|
|
201,849
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
3,732
|
|
|
(6,762
|
)
|
|
(5,651
|
)
|
|
(5,855
|
)
|
|
(29,494
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
(92
|
)
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
45
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
327
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
3,640
|
|
|
(6,860
|
)
|
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
(29,167
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
1,917
|
|
|
9,345
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
(3,755
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
1,723
|
|
|
$
|
(16,205
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
Weighted average number of shares used in per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
19,145
|
|
|
18,367
|
|
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
Diluted
|
19,846
|
|
|
18,367
|
|
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes stock-based compensation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Marketing and advertising
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,692
|
|
|
$
|
1,950
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
Customer care and enrollment
|
342
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
418
|
|
Technology and content
|
1,641
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
General and administrative
|
3,707
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
Restructuring
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
$
|
7,802
|
|
|
$
|
5,877
|
|
|
$
|
7,002
|
|
|
$
|
7,266
|
|
|
$
|
9,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
107,055
|
|
|
$
|
51,415
|
|
|
$
|
62,710
|
|
|
$
|
61,781
|
|
|
$
|
40,293
|
|
Working capital
|
$
|
97,220
|
|
|
$
|
39,738
|
|
|
$
|
45,606
|
|
|
$
|
48,218
|
|
|
$
|
28,385
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
166,426
|
|
|
$
|
106,664
|
|
|
$
|
113,319
|
|
|
$
|
108,899
|
|
|
$
|
88,690
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
$
|
6,165
|
|
|
$
|
6,449
|
|
|
$
|
4,962
|
|
|
$
|
3,374
|
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)
|
$
|
30,466
|
|
|
$
|
14,261
|
|
|
$
|
9,498
|
|
|
$
|
4,616
|
|
|
$
|
(20,796
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
133,017
|
|
|
$
|
73,478
|
|
|
$
|
76,421
|
|
|
$
|
77,601
|
|
|
$
|
61,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue By Segment Data (in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Commission revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare
|
$
|
57,508
|
|
|
$
|
74,340
|
|
|
$
|
95,146
|
|
Individual, Family and Small Business
|
113,749
|
|
|
96,510
|
|
|
63,278
|
|
Total commission revenue
|
171,257
|
|
|
170,850
|
|
|
158,424
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare
|
5,655
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
|
7,438
|
|
Individual, Family and Small Business
|
12,629
|
|
|
10,181
|
|
|
6,493
|
|
Total other revenue
|
18,284
|
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
13,931
|
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
189,541
|
|
|
$
|
186,960
|
|
|
$
|
172,355
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Overview
We are a leading private health insurance exchange for individuals, families and small businesses. Through our website addresses (
www.eHealth.com
,
www.eHealthInsurance.com
,
www.eHealthMedicare.com, www.Medicare.com,
www.PlanPrescriber.com
and
www.GoMedigap.com)
, consumers can get quotes from leading health insurance carriers, compare plans side-by-side, and apply for and purchase Medicare-related, individual and family, small business and ancillary health insurance plans. Our ecommerce technology also enables us to deliver consumers’ health insurance applications electronically to health insurance carriers. As a result, we simplify and streamline the complex and traditionally paper-intensive health insurance sales and purchasing process.
On January 22, 2018, we completed our acquisition of Wealth, Health and Life Advisors, LLC, more commonly known as GoMedigap, a technology-enabled provider of Medicare Supplement enrollment services. GoMedigap has built a leading consumer acquisition and engagement platform focused on meeting the Medicare Supplement insurance needs of its individual customers with a technology-enabled, consumer-centric approach that aligns with our mission and operations. This strategic acquisition significantly enhances our growing presence in the Medicare Supplement market, puts us in a stronger position with carriers and strategic partners and allows us to accelerate our projected Medicare plan enrollment growth in 2018 and beyond. For more information on our acquisition of GoMedigap, see
Note 10-Subsequent Events
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
.
We have invested heavily in technology and content related to our ecommerce platforms. We have also invested significant time and resources in obtaining licenses to sell health insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, developing member acquisition programs, obtaining necessary regulatory approvals of our websites and establishing relationships and appointments with leading health insurance carriers, enabling us to offer thousands of health insurance plans online. Our ecommerce platforms can be accessed directly through our websites as well as through our network of marketing partners.
We operate as two distinct reporting segments:
•
Medicare and
•
Individual, Family and Small Business.
For more information on segment and geographic information, see
Note1-Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
and
Note 9-Operating Segments, Geographic Information and Significant Customers
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Health Care Reform
In March 2010, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act were signed into law. These health care reform laws contain provisions that changed and will continue to change the health insurance industry in substantial ways. We have described various aspects of health care reform in Part I, Item 1,
Business - Health Care Reform
and
Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business
. Various aspects of health care reform may impact our business positively. For instance, the mandate that individuals and families have qualified health insurance or face a tax penalty and the government providing individuals and families’ subsidies in the form of premium tax credits and cost sharing reductions are provisions in the law that could benefit our business. The penalty for violating the mandate has been reduced to zero effective in 2019, and notwithstanding these aspects of health care reform, the implementation of health care reform has significantly reduced our individual and family health insurance membership and commission revenue and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The Trump administration and Republican leadership have repeatedly communicated their intention to alter or repeal the Affordable Care Act, but their efforts to do so have so far been unsuccessful. As a part of the tax reform law that came into effect in December 2017, the tax penalty for violating the individual mandate to have qualifying health insurance was reduced to zero effective in 2019, essentially repealing it. The essential repeal of the individual mandate could have a further adverse impact on the individual and family health insurance market. In addition to the repeal of the mandate, the Trump administration issued an executive order in October 2017 that directed the executive branch of the government to consider proposing regulations and revising guidance to expand access to association health plans, expand the availability of short term health
insurance and increase the usability of health reimbursement arrangements. As a result of the executive order, new regulations have been proposed that would facilitate association-based health insurance plans and promote the sale of more short term health insurance. The expansion of the use of short term health insurance may cause individuals and families to purchase short term health insurance instead of individual and family health insurance. If adopted, the proposed regulations relating to association health plans would allow small businesses to join industry or geographically-based associations and collectively purchase large group health insurance plans. Large group health insurance is not subject to many of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, including the requirement that health insurance plans cover all of the essential health benefits defined under the Affordable Care Act. The goal of the proposed regulation is to reduce the cost of insurance for individuals who receive their health insurance under associations. The proposed regulations relating to association-based health insurance and short term health insurance could present new business opportunities for us, but also may reduce the size of the individual, family and small business health insurance markets that we address.
Summary of Selected Application and Membership Metrics
In addition to traditional financial metrics, we rely upon the several business metrics to evaluate our business performance and facilitate long-term strategic planning. The following table shows certain selected quarterly metrics for the years ended December 31,
2016
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Metrics:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Mar. 31, 2016
|
|
Jun. 30, 2016
|
|
Sept. 30,
2016
|
|
Dec. 31,
2016
|
|
Mar. 31, 2017
|
|
Jun. 30, 2017
|
|
Sept. 30,
2017
|
|
Dec. 31,
2017
|
Submitted applications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare submitted applications (1)
|
30,900
|
|
|
32,700
|
|
|
24,100
|
|
|
85,300
|
|
|
31,300
|
|
|
31,200
|
|
|
28,900
|
|
|
98,800
|
|
IFP submitted applications (2)
|
74,300
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
45,100
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
34,900
|
|
Other submitted applications (3)
|
97,400
|
|
|
60,600
|
|
|
56,400
|
|
|
62,100
|
|
|
63,400
|
|
|
53,400
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
61,800
|
|
Total submitted applications (4)
|
202,600
|
|
|
103,100
|
|
|
89,400
|
|
|
192,500
|
|
|
116,700
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
195,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare Advantage submitted applications (5)
|
23,126
|
|
|
24,923
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
23,100
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated membership:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare products (6)
|
220,300
|
|
|
242,700
|
|
|
242,500
|
|
|
304,900
|
|
|
284,900
|
|
|
300,400
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
384,900
|
|
IFP products (7)
|
523,000
|
|
|
481,300
|
|
|
390,400
|
|
|
360,600
|
|
|
265,200
|
|
|
244,900
|
|
|
227,300
|
|
|
224,400
|
|
Other products (8)
|
409,600
|
|
|
381,900
|
|
|
355,400
|
|
|
349,700
|
|
|
342,600
|
|
|
340,500
|
|
|
332,300
|
|
|
327,600
|
|
Total estimated membership (9)
|
1,152,900
|
|
|
1,105,900
|
|
|
988,300
|
|
|
1,015,200
|
|
|
892,700
|
|
|
885,800
|
|
|
874,100
|
|
|
936,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
|
Medicare-related health insurance applications submitted on our website or through our customer care center during the period, including Medicare Advantage, Medicare Part D prescription drug and Medicare Supplement plans. Applications are counted as submitted when the applicant completes the application and either clicks the submit button on our website or provides verbal authorization to submit the application. The applicant may have additional actions to take before the application will be reviewed by the insurance carrier, such as providing additional information. In addition, an applicant may submit more than one application.
|
(2)
|
|
Major medical Individual and Family plan ("IFP") health insurance applications submitted on our website during the period. Applications are counted as submitted when the applicant completes the application, clicks the submit button on our website and submits the application to us. The applicant may have additional actions to take before the application will be reviewed by the insurance carrier, such as providing additional information. In addition, an applicant may submit more than one application. We define our IFP offerings as major medical individual and family health insurance plans, which does not include Medicare-related, small business or ancillary plans (primarily consisting of short-term, dental, life, vision, and accident insurance plans).
|
(3)
|
|
Applications for health insurance plans other than Medicare and IFP submitted on our website during the period. Applications for ancillary plans are counted as submitted when the applicant completes the application, clicks the submit button on our website and submits the application to us. Applications for small business plans are counted as submitted when the applicant completes the application, the employees complete their applications, the applicant submits the application to us and we submit the application to the carrier. The applicant may have additional actions to take before the application will be reviewed by the insurance carrier, such as providing additional information. In addition, an applicant may submit more than one application.
|
(4)
|
|
Applications for all health insurance plans submitted on our website or through our customer care center during the period. See notes (1), (2) and (3) above for more information as to what constitutes a submitted application.
|
(5)
|
|
Medicare Advantage plan health insurance applications submitted on our website or through our customer care center during the period. Applications are counted as submitted when the applicant completes the application and either clicks the submit button on our website or provides verbal authorization to submit the application. The applicant may have additional actions to take before the application will be reviewed by the insurance carrier, such as providing additional information. In addition, an applicant may submit more than one application. Medicare Advantage submitted applications are included in Medicare submitted applications - See Note1 above for more detail.
|
(6)
|
|
Estimated number of members active on Medicare-related health insurance as of the date indicated based on the number of members for whom we have received or applied a commission payment during the month of estimation.
|
(7)
|
|
Estimated number of members active on IFP health insurance plans as of the date indicated. To determine the estimate, we take the sum of (i) the number of IFP members for whom we have received or applied a commission payment for a month that is up to six months prior to the date of estimation after reducing that number using historical experience for assumed member cancellations over the period being estimated; and (ii) the number of approved members over that period (after reducing that number by the percentage of members who do not accept their approved policy from the same month of the previous year for estimated member cancellations through the date of the estimate). To the extent we determine we have received substantially all of the commission payments related to a given month during the period being estimated, we will take the number of members for whom we have received or applied a commission payment during the month of estimation. For IFP health insurance plans, a member who purchases and is active on multiple standalone insurance plans will be counted as a member more than once. For example, a member who is active on both an individual and family health insurance plan and a standalone dental plan will be counted as two continuing members.
|
(8)
|
|
Estimated number of members active on insurance plans other than Medicare-related health insurance and IFP health insurance plans as of the date indicated. For ancillary health insurance plans (such as short-term, dental, vision, accident and student), we take the sum of (i) the number of members for whom we have received or applied a commission payment for a month that is up to three months prior to the date of estimation (after reducing that number using historical experience for assumed member cancellations over the period being estimated); and (ii) the number of approved members over that period (after reducing that number using historical experience for an assumed number of members who do not accept their approved policy from the same month of the previous year and for estimated member cancellations through the date of the estimate). To the extent we determine we have received substantially all of the commission payments related to a given month during the period being estimated, we will take the number of members for whom we have received or applied a commission payment during the month of estimation. The one to three-month period varies by insurance product and is largely dependent upon the timeliness of commission payment and related reporting from the related carriers. For small business health insurance plans, we estimate the number of members using the number of initial members at the time the group is approved, and we update this number for changes in membership if such changes are reported to us by the group or carrier in the period it is reported. However, groups generally notify the carrier directly of policy cancellations and increases or decreases in group size without informing us. Health insurance carriers often do not communicate policy cancellation information or group size changes to us. We often are made aware of policy cancellations and group size changes at the time of annual renewal and update our membership statistics accordingly in the period they are reported.
|
(9)
|
|
Estimated number of members active on all insurance plans as of the date indicated. See the notes (6), (7) and (8) above for additional information regarding our calculation of total estimated membership.
|
Health insurance carrier’s bill and collect insurance premiums paid by our members. The carriers do not report to us the number of members that we have as of a given date. The majority of our members who terminate their policies do so by discontinuing their premium payments to the carrier and do not inform us of the cancellation. Also, some of our members pay their premiums less frequently than monthly. Given the number of months required to observe non-payment of commissions in order to confirm cancellations, we estimate the number of members who are active on insurance policies as of a specified date.
After we have estimated membership for a period, we may receive information from health insurance carriers that would have impacted the estimate if we had received the information prior to the date of estimation. We may receive
commission payments or other information that indicates that a member who was not included in our estimates for a prior period was in fact an active member at that time, or that a member who was included in our estimates was in fact not an active member of ours. For instance, we reconcile information carriers provide to us and may determine that we were not historically paid commissions owed to us, which would cause us to have underestimated membership. Conversely, carriers may require us to return commission payments paid in a prior period due to policy cancellations for members we previously estimated as being active. We do not update our estimated membership numbers reported in previous periods. Instead, we reflect updated information regarding our historical membership in the membership estimate for the current period. As a result of the delay in our receipt of information from insurance carriers, actual trends in our membership are most discernible over periods longer than from one quarter to the next. As a result of the delay we experience in receiving information about our membership, it is difficult for us to determine with any certainty the impact of current conditions on our membership retention. Health care reform and its impacts as well as other factors could cause the assumptions and estimates that we make in connection with estimating our membership to be inaccurate, which would cause our membership estimates to be inaccurate.
Member Acquisition
Marketing initiatives are an important component of our strategy to increase revenue. Our marketing initiatives are focused on three primary member acquisition channels: direct, marketing partners and online advertising and are primarily designed to encourage consumers to complete an application for health insurance. For the years ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and
2017
, applications submitted through us for Medicare-related, individual and family, small business and ancillary health insurance products from our three member acquisition channels, expressed as a percentage of all health insurance applications submitted through us during the same periods, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Source of total submitted applications
(as a percentage of total submitted applications for the year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
51%
|
|
53%
|
|
57%
|
Marketing partners
|
37%
|
|
34%
|
|
35%
|
Online advertising
|
12%
|
|
13%
|
|
8%
|
Total
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Factors Influencing Commission Revenue
Our commission revenue is influenced by a number of factors including:
|
|
•
|
the number of applications for Medicare-related, individual, family and small business and ancillary health insurance we submit to health insurance carriers that are approved;
|
|
|
•
|
the rate at which the individuals on those applications turn into paying members;
|
|
|
•
|
the commission rates we receive for the health insurance plans that we sell; and
|
|
|
•
|
our membership retention.
|
Submitted Applications.
In 2017 we generated 10% Medicare submitted application growth during 2017 compared to 2016, which represented a deceleration from prior years’ growth, driven primarily by the change in our marketing strategy as we de-emphasized less profitable customer acquisition channels and worked on building out the more efficient direct and strategic partner channels. As a result of this strategy, we experienced an improvement in conversion of leads to applications and lower cost of acquisition in the second half of 2017 compared to the first half of 2017 and the same period a year ago, and anticipate that we will see higher growth in Medicare submitted applications in 2018. Our individual and family plan submitted applications declined in 2017 due to a continuing challenging environment in this market, as well as our reduction in marketing spend.
Approval Rates and Initial Payment Rates.
Approval rates for Medicare-related health insurance remained relatively consistent in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Initial payment rates for approved Medicare-related health insurance plans remained relatively consistent in 2015, but declined slightly in 2016 and 2017 due to a change in carrier mix. As a result of the health care reform prohibition on using pre-existing health conditions as a reason to deny health insurance applications, we have experienced higher approval rates on individual and family plan applications submitted during the open enrollment periods
compared to periods before health care reform implementation. Individual and family health insurance approval rates have historically been lower outside of the open enrollment period than for applications submitted during the open enrollment period. In addition, during the first and second quarters of 2015, our individual and family plan commission revenue benefited from carriers paying us earlier on policies approved during the open enrollment period that ended in 2015 compared to the prior open enrollment period. The timing of carrier payments received during 2016 and 2017 were similar to 2015.
Commission Rates
. The average commission dollars per-member-per-month that we receive for new health insurance plan members varies based upon a number of factors, including the ratio of plans that we sold for which we receive per member-per-month commissions compared to percentage-of-premium commissions, the premiums on the policies we sold, the mix of our members by health insurance carrier and the commission rates we receive from each carrier. Additionally, commission rates may vary by carrier, by geography and by the type of plan purchased by a member.
We observed higher commission rates on Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement plans that we sold during the 2016 annual enrollment period for coverage effective in 2017 compared to policies that we sold during the 2015 annual enrollment period for coverage effective in 2016. Our average commission rates for Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement plans sold in years prior to 2017 have remained consistent during 2017 compared to 2016.
We have experienced a reduction in our average commission rates for individual and family plans sold during the 2016 open enrollment period for coverage effective in 2017 compared to the 2015 open enrollment period for coverage effective in 2016. Changes in the volume of health insurance applications submitted during the annual open enrollment periods for individual and family plans compared to applications submitted outside of the annual open enrollment period has caused us to experience shifts in the concentration of our membership by health insurance carrier and type of plan purchased and corresponding fluctuations in our average commission rate. Recently, given the significant losses that carriers have sustained in connection with their sale of individual and family health insurance, several health insurance carriers with which we have a relationship, made changes to the commissions they pay us, including reducing or eliminating our commissions for individual and family health insurance enrollments outside of the open enrollment period, reducing or eliminating our commissions for individual and family health insurance plans sold during the 2016 open enrollment period for coverage effective in 2017 and/or reducing our 2017 renewal commissions for individual and family health insurance plans we previously sold in prior years.
Retention Rates
. Our commission revenue is also influenced by our member retention rates. Retention rates are typically lower in the first policy year. Our Medicare Advantage membership retention rates for the first policy year have improved during 2017 compared to 2016, while retention rates for renewal years for Medicare Advantage, Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans declined slightly during 2017 compared to 2016. Our individual and family plan membership retention rates were negatively impacted by health care reform throughout 2016 and 2017 with 2017 retention rates lower than 2016.
The number of new individual and family health insurance members added during 2016 and 2017 was insufficient to offset the loss of existing members, resulting in a decline in our estimated individual and family health insurance membership during those periods. We believe the decline in retention rates related to premium inflation in the individual and family plan market and carriers exiting the individual and family health insurance market altogether or in certain jurisdictions.
Adoption of ASC 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606)
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606), requiring an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,
Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
. ASU 2016-10 provides guidance in identifying performance obligations and determining the appropriate accounting for licensing arrangements. The effective date and transition requirements for this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09).
Topic 606 may be adopted retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). We will adopt this new accounting standard for the reporting period beginning on January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method to restate each prior reporting period presented.
We have completed a review of our business processes, systems and controls as part of our efforts to adopt the new revenue recognition standard and are executing on our developed project plan, which includes analyzing the standard’s impact
on our contract portfolio, comparing our historical policies and practices to the requirements of the new standard and identifying differences from applying the requirements of the new standard to our contracts. We have implemented necessary internal controls to ensure we adequately evaluate our portfolio of contracts under the five-step model promulgated by FASB to ensure proper assessment of our operating results under the new standard. We do not expect a significant change in our control environment due to the adoption of the new standard; however, we will continue to assess until we finalize the impact of the adoption. We are also reporting on the progress of the implementation to our board of directors and the audit committee of our board of directors on a regular basis during the project’s duration.
The adoption of the new standard will have a material impact to our opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2016 due to the cumulative effect of adopting the standard using the full retrospective method. In addition, our adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on our commission revenue and, as a result, on our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017. Under the new standard, since our services associated with Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plans are complete once an application is approved by a carrier, we will recognize Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plan commission revenue at the time the plan is approved by the carrier equal to the estimated commissions we expect to collect on the plan. The estimated commissions we expect to collect on a plan and that we will recognize as revenue upon approval of the application will vary based on product type and other factors, such as the estimated commission rates and the estimated life of the respective policies. These estimates will change with our actual experience after adoption. We are still in the process of finalizing our estimates by product type. Due to annual services we provide in renewing small business health insurance plans, we expect to recognize small business health insurance plan commission revenue at the time the plan is approved by the carrier, and when it renews each year thereafter, equal to the estimated commissions we expect to collect from the plan over the following 12-months. We have reviewed our contracts with our customers, the carriers whose plans we sell, and determined that we do not incur incremental costs when we enter into new contracts with carriers; therefore, we do not expect to capitalize contract acquisition costs as a result of the adoption of the new standard. The new standard will require us to make significant estimates, including, but not limited to, the estimated consideration to be paid to us over the estimated life of plans approved by carriers, or the following 12 months for small business health insurance plans, for which we are the broker of record. In addition, we are in the process of assessing the impact the adoption of the new standard will have on our accounting for income taxes. Our adoption of the new standard will also significantly change the seasonality of our revenues, primarily with respect to our Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plan commission revenue. Under Topic 606, we expect to recognize significantly lower commission revenue in the first quarter of each year when we have historically recognized commission revenue from Medicare-related renewals and expect to instead record significantly greater commission revenue in the fourth quarter of each year as a result of the increase in approved plans we experience during the fourth quarter annual and open enrollment periods.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, historical experience, and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances to determine reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future consolidated results of operations may be affected.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and the effect of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance. The accounting policies we believe to reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and are most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are as follows:
|
|
•
|
Stock-Based Compensation;
|
|
|
•
|
Realizability of Long-Lived Assets and;
|
|
|
•
|
Accounting for Income Taxes.
|
During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue for our services when each of the following four criteria is met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Our revenue is primarily comprised of compensation paid to us by health insurance carriers related to insurance plans that have been purchased by a member who used our service. We define a member as an individual currently covered by an insurance plan, including Medicare-related, individual and family, small business and ancillary plans, for which we are entitled to receive compensation from an insurance carrier.
Commission Revenue
We typically enter into contractual agency relationships with health insurance carriers that are non-exclusive and terminable on short notice by either party for any reason. In addition, health insurance carriers often have the ability to terminate or amend our agreements unilaterally on short notice, including provisions in our agreements relating to our commission rates. The amendment or termination of an agreement we have with a health insurance carrier may adversely impact the commissions we are paid on health insurance plans that we have already sold through the carrier.
For both Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, we receive a fixed, annual commission payment from insurance carriers once the plan is approved by the carrier and either a fixed, monthly or annual commission payment beginning with and subsequent to the second plan year. Additionally, commission rates may be higher in the first twelve months of the plan if the plan is the first Medicare Advantage or Medicare Part D prescription drug plan issued to the member. In the first plan year of a Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, after the health insurance carrier approves the application but during the effective year of the plan, we are paid a fixed commission that is prorated for the number of months remaining in the calendar year. Additionally, if the plan is the first Medicare Advantage or Medicare Part D plan issued to the member, we may receive a higher commission rate that covers a full twelve-month period, regardless of the month the plan was effective. We earn commission revenue for Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans for which we are the broker of record, typically until either the policy is cancelled or we otherwise do not remain the agent on the policy. We recognize commission revenue for both Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans for the entire plan year once the annual or first monthly commission amount for the plan year is reported to us by the carrier, net of an estimate for future forfeiture amounts due to cancellations. For commissions paid to us on a monthly basis, we record a receivable for the commission amounts to be received over the remainder of the plan year, net of an estimate for commission amounts not expected to be collected due to policy cancellations, which is included in Accounts Receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement when we have a commission agreement with a health insurance carrier. Our services are complete when a carrier has approved an application in the initial year and when a member has renewed in a renewal year. The seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured when a carrier has approved an application and the carrier reports to us the annual or first monthly renewal commission amount for each plan year.
For individual and family, Medicare Supplement, small business and ancillary plans, our compensation generally represents a flat amount per member per month or a percentage of the premium amount collected by the carrier during the period that a member maintains coverage under a plan (commissions) and, to a much lesser extent, override commissions that health insurance carriers pay us for achieving certain objectives. Premium-based commissions are reported to us after the premiums are collected by the carrier, generally on a monthly basis. We generally continue to receive the commission payment from the relevant insurance carrier until the health insurance plan is cancelled or we otherwise do not remain the agent on the policy. We recognize commission revenue for individual and family, Medicare Supplement, small business and ancillary plans as the commissions are reported to us by the carrier, net of an estimate for future forfeiture amounts due to policy cancellations. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement when we have a commission agreement with a health insurance carrier, a carrier reports to us that it has approved an application submitted through our ecommerce platform and the applicant starts making payments on the plan. Our services are complete when a carrier has approved an application. The seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured when commission amounts have been reported to us by a carrier.
We recognize individual and family, small business and ancillary commission override revenue when reported to us by a carrier based on the actual attainment of predetermined target sales levels or other objectives as determined by the carrier. Commission override revenue, which we recognize on the same basis as individual and family, small business and ancillary commissions, is generally reported to us in a more irregular pattern than such commissions.
Commissions for all health insurance plans we sell are reported to us by a cash payment and commission statement. We generally receive these communications simultaneously. In instances when we receive the cash payment and commission
statement separately and in different accounting periods, we recognize revenue in the period that we receive the earliest communication, provided we receive the second corroborating communication shortly following the end of the accounting period. If the second corroborating communication is not received shortly following the end of the accounting period, we recognize revenue in the period the second communication is received. During 2014, CMS issued a regulation prohibiting carriers from paying commissions during the fourth quarter on Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans sold during the fourth quarter with an effective date in the following year. During the fourth quarters of 2015, 2016 and 2017, we recognized revenue for policies included on a commission statement received prior to the end of the year for which payment was received shortly after year-end and in connection with the carriers’ normal payment cycle during the first quarter of that following year. We use the data in the commission statements to help identify the members for which we are receiving a commission payment and the amount received for each member, and to estimate future forfeiture amounts due to policy cancellations. As a result, we recognize the net amount of compensation earned as the agent in the transaction.
Certain commission amounts are subject to forfeiture if the policy is subsequently cancelled and either the carrier takes back all or a portion of the commission they have paid to us or we will no longer receive monthly commission payments for the remainder of the plan year. We record an estimate for these forfeitures based on our historical cancellation experience using data provided on commission statements. Policy cancellations and the commission amounts, if any, to be taken back by the carrier are typically reported to us by health insurance carriers several months after the policy’s cancellation date. Our estimate for forfeitures payable to a carrier, which is included in Other Current Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, includes an estimate of both the reporting time lag and the forfeiture amount, based on our historical experience by policy type. Similarly, our estimate for commission amounts not expected to be collected due to policy cancellations, which is recorded as a reduction of Accounts Receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, includes an estimate of the annual policy cancellation rate, based on our historical experience by policy type. Changes in our historical trends would result in changes to our estimated forfeitures in future periods. There were no changes in our average forfeiture rates or reporting time lag during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017 that had a material impact on our estimate for forfeitures.
We rely on all of our health insurance carriers to report accurately and in a timely manner the amount of commissions earned by us, and we calculate our commission revenue, prepare our financial reports, projections and budgets, and direct our marketing and other operating efforts based on the reports we receive from them. Each month we analyze the reports we receive from health insurance carriers by comparing them to the database we maintain on our members. It is often difficult for us to independently determine whether or not carriers are reporting all commissions due to us, primarily because members on Medicare-related, individual and family, small business and ancillary health insurance policies terminate their policies either by contacting the carrier directly instead of by informing us of the cancellation or by discontinuing their premium payments to the carrier. Also, some of our individual, family and small business members pay their premiums less frequently than monthly. This results in our having to identify underpayment or non-payment of commissions on a policy and follow up with a carrier to obtain an explanation and/or request correction of the amount of commissions paid to us.
Other Revenue
Our sponsorship and advertising program allows carriers to purchase advertising space in specific markets in a sponsorship area on our website. In return, we are typically paid a monthly fee, which is recognized over the period that advertising is displayed, and often a performance fee based on metrics such as submitted health insurance applications, which is recognized when the earned amount are fixed and determinable and all other revenue recognition criteria has been met. We also offer Medicare advertising services, which include website development, hosting and maintenance. In these instances, we are typically paid a fixed, up-front fee, which we recognize as revenue over the service period.
Our commercial technology licensing business allows carriers the use of our ecommerce platform to offer their own health insurance policies on their websites and agents to utilize our technology to power their online quoting, content and application submission processes. Typically, we are paid a one-time implementation fee, which we recognize on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the customer relationship (generally the initial term of the agreement), commencing once the technology is available for use by the third party, and a performance fee based on metrics such as submitted health insurance applications. The metrics used to calculate performance fees for both sponsorship and advertising and technology licensing are based on performance criteria that are either measured based on data tracked by us, or based on data tracked by the third party. In instances where the performance criteria data is tracked by us, we recognize revenue in the period of performance and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In instances where the performance criteria data is tracked by the third party, we recognize revenue when the amounts earned are either fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Typically, this occurs through our receipt of a cash payment from the third party along with a detailed statement containing the data that is tracked by the third party.
Deferred revenue includes deferred technology licensing implementation fees and amounts billed for deliverables in multiple element arrangements that do not have stand-alone value from other, undelivered elements, as well as amounts billed or collected from sponsorship or technology licensing customers in advance of our performing our service for such customers. It also includes the amount by which both unbilled and billed services provided under our technology licensing arrangements exceed the straight-line revenue recognized to date. We defer commission amounts that have been paid to us related to transactions where our services are complete, but where we cannot currently estimate future forfeitures related to those amounts.
We allocate revenue to all units of accounting within an arrangement with multiple deliverables at the inception of the arrangement using the relative selling price method. The relative selling price method allocates any discount in an arrangement proportionally to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s relative selling price. The relative selling price established for each deliverable is based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”) if available, third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE is not available, or best estimate of selling price if neither VSOE nor third-party evidence is available. When used, the best estimate of selling price reflects our best estimates of what the selling prices of certain deliverables would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. Our process for determining best estimate of selling price for deliverables without VSOE or third-party evidence of selling price considers multiple factors that may vary depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key factors considered by us in developing the relative selling prices for our technology licensing fees include prices charged by us for similar offerings and our historical pricing practices. We may also consider additional factors as appropriate, including competition.
A deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has stand-alone value and there are no customer-negotiated right of refunds for the delivered elements. If the arrangement includes a customer-negotiated right of refund relative to the delivered item, and the delivery and performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control, the delivered element constitutes a separate unit of accounting. In circumstances when the aforementioned criteria are not met, the deliverable is combined with the undelivered elements, and the allocation of the arrangement consideration and revenue recognition is determined for the combined unit as a single unit. Allocation of the consideration is determined at the inception of the arrangement on the basis of each unit’s relative selling price. After the arrangement consideration has been allocated to each unit of accounting based on their relative selling prices, we apply revenue recognition criteria separately to each respective unit of accounting in the arrangement in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.
Adoption of New Revenue Recognition Policy
In the first quarter of 2018, we will adopt Accounting Standards Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, which will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, as discussed in
Note 1-Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
.
Under the new standard, we will be required to estimate commissions we expect to collect from Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plans as commission revenue over the life of the plan at the time it is approved by the carrier. Due to annual services we provide in renewing small business health insurance plans, we expect to recognize small business health insurance plan commission revenue at the time the plan is approved by the carrier, and when it renews each year thereafter, equal to the estimated commissions we expect to collect from the plan over the following 12-months. Our estimates will be based on a number of assumptions including, but not limited to, estimating forfeitures from plan cancellations, customer renewal rates and expected future commission rates likely to be received per member based on renewal, product type and carrier. These assumptions will be based on historical trends and incorporate management’s judgment. To the extent we make changes to the assumptions, we will recognize any material impact of the changes to estimated commission revenue in the reporting period in which the change is made.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize stock-based compensation expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss based on the estimated fair value of our stock-based awards over their respective vesting periods, which is generally four years. The estimated grant date fair value of our stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model and a single option award approach. The weighted-average expected term for stock options granted is calculated using historical option exercise behavior. The dividend yield is determined by dividing the expected per share dividend during the coming year by the grant date stock price. Through December 31, 2017, we had not declared or paid any cash dividends, and we do not expect to pay any in the foreseeable future. We base the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term of our stock options. Expected volatility is determined using a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options in our stock and historical volatility of our stock price. The estimated attainment of performance-based awards and related expense is based on the expectations of revenue target achievement. The estimated fair value of performance awards with market conditions is determined using the Monte-
Carlo simulation model. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards and expected attainment of performance-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. We will continue to use judgment in evaluating the expected term and volatility related to our own stock-based awards on a prospective basis, and incorporating these factors into the model. Changes in key assumptions could significantly impact the valuation of such instruments.
Business Combinations
We include the results of operations of acquired businesses prospectively from the acquisition date. We allocate the fair value of the purchase consideration of our acquired businesses to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill.
When determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we make significant estimates and assumptions. When provisional amounts are recorded in the reporting period in which a business combination occurs, adjustments to the provisional amounts may be subsequently recognized to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized at the acquisition date. Adjustments to the provisional amounts identified during the measurement period, which is a period not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, are reported in the period the adjustment is identified by means of an adjustment to goodwill, with the effect on earnings measured as if the provisional amounts had been completed at the acquisition date. Adjustments to amounts recognized in a business combination that occur after the end of the measurement period are recognized in current period operations.
Realizability of Long-Lived Assets
We assess the realizability of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets and goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Factors that we consider in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant negative industry or economic trends or significant changes or planned changes in our use of the assets. Additionally, we test goodwill and our other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis on or about November 30 of each year. When performing the annual goodwill impairment test we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. When performing the annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the indefinite-lived intangible is impaired.
If events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable, for long lived assets other than goodwill, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, which include purchased technology, pharmacy relationships, trade names, and trademarks, we measure the recoverability of assets that will continue to be used in our operations by comparing the carrying value of the asset grouping to our estimate of the related total future undiscounted net cash flows. For assets related to our book-of-business transfers, we compare the carrying amount of each asset to the commission revenue expected to be generated by the policies included in each respective book-of-business. Our estimates of commission revenue expected to be generated by each book-of-business include subjective judgments regarding expected policy cancellations. If an asset grouping’s carrying value is not recoverable through the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset grouping is considered to be impaired. The impairment charge is calculated as the amount by which the asset grouping’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
We must make subjective judgments in determining the independent cash flows that can be related to specific asset groupings. In addition, we must make subjective judgments regarding the remaining useful lives of assets with finite useful lives. When we determine that the useful life of an asset is shorter than we had originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of amortization over the new remaining useful life of the asset.
Accounting for Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the liability method. Deferred income taxes are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Since tax laws and financial accounting standards differ in their recognition and measurement of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues, expenses, gains and losses, differences arise between the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income for a year and between the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in our financial statements. Because we assume that the reported amounts of assets and liabilities will be recovered and settled, respectively, a difference between the tax basis of an asset or a liability and its reported amount in the balance sheet will result in a taxable or a deductible amount in some future years when the related liabilities are settled or the reported amounts of the assets are recovered, which gives rise to a deferred tax asset or liability. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery does not meet the more likely than not criteria, we must establish a valuation allowance. Management judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes. This process involves estimating our actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences that may result in deferred tax assets.
Assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets is dependent upon several factors, including the likelihood and amount, if any, of future taxable income in relevant jurisdictions during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We forecast taxable income by considering all available positive and negative evidence, including our history of operating income and losses and our financial plans and estimates that we use to manage the business. These assumptions require significant judgment about future taxable income. As at the year ended December 31, 2017, we maintained a full valuation allowance against our federal and state deferred tax assets. Any future change in the valuation allowance could have an effect on the income tax provision in our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the “Jobs Act”, was signed into law resulting in significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Jobs Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, changes U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and implements a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. While we are able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in corporate rates and other changes, the final impact of the Jobs Act may differ from these estimates, as a result of, among other things, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, additional guidance that may be issued by the internal revenue service and resulting actions we may take.
Future changes in various factors, such as the amount of stock-based compensation we record during the period and the related tax benefit we realize upon the exercise of employee stock options, potential limitations on the use of our federal and state net operating loss credit carry forwards, pending or future tax law changes including rate changes and the tax benefit from or limitations on our ability to utilize research and development credits, the amount of non-deductible lobbying and acquisition-related costs, changes in our valuation allowance and state and foreign taxes, would impact our estimates, and as a result, could affect our effective tax rate and the amount of income tax expense we record, and pay, in future periods.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our operating results and related percentage of total revenues for the years ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission
|
$
|
171,257
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
$
|
170,850
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
$
|
158,424
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
Other
|
18,284
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
13,931
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Total revenue
|
189,541
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
186,960
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
172,355
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
4,178
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Marketing and advertising
|
75,571
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
72,213
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
65,874
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Customer care and enrollment
|
43,159
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
48,718
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
59,183
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Technology and content
|
36,351
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
32,749
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
32,889
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
30,239
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
35,216
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
39,969
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Acquisition costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
621
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Restructuring charge (benefit)
|
4,541
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
1,153
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
195,192
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
192,815
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
201,849
|
|
|
117
|
|
Loss from operations
|
(5,651
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
(5,855
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
(29,494
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
45
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
102
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
327
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Loss before benefit from income taxes
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
(29,167
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
(843
|
)
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(3,755
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
Operating costs and expenses include the following amounts of stock-based compensation expense (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Marketing and advertising
|
$
|
1,950
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
Customer care and enrollment
|
477
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
418
|
|
Technology and content
|
1,728
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
General and administrative
|
2,734
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
113
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,002
|
|
|
$
|
7,266
|
|
|
$
|
9,694
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
Revenue
The following table presents our commission revenue, other revenue and total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar and percentage changes from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Commission
|
$
|
171,257
|
|
|
$
|
(407
|
)
|
|
—%
|
|
$
|
170,850
|
|
|
$
|
(12,426
|
)
|
|
(7)%
|
|
$
|
158,424
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
Other
|
18,284
|
|
|
(2,174
|
)
|
|
(12)%
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
(2,179
|
)
|
|
(14)%
|
|
13,931
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
189,541
|
|
|
$
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
(1)%
|
|
$
|
186,960
|
|
|
$
|
(14,605
|
)
|
|
(8)%
|
|
$
|
172,355
|
|
2017 compared to
2016
—Commission revenue decreased
$12.4 million
, or
7%
, in 2017, due to a
$33.2 million
or
34%
decrease in Individual, Family and Small Business commission revenue, partially offset by a
$20.8 million
, or
28%
increase in Medicare commission revenue. The decrease in Individual, Family and Small Business commission revenue was primarily due to a
38%
decline in estimated individual and family health insurance membership as of December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, primarily attributable to lower submitted application volumes and a decline in our membership retention rate in 2017. The increase in Medicare commission revenue was primarily attributable to a
26%
increase in estimated Medicare membership as of December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, in part due to growth in our sale of Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement plans and improved retention rates.
Other revenue decreased
$2.2 million
, or
14%
, in 2017 due primarily to decreases of
$1.5 million
in online sponsorship and advertising revenue, $0.4 million in lead generation revenue and $0.2 million in licensing fees.
2016 compared to 2015
—Commission revenue decreased
$0.4 million
in 2016, due to a $17.2 million decrease in Individual, Family and Small Business commission revenue, partially offset by a $16.8 million increase in Medicare commission revenue. The decrease in Individual, Family and Small Business commission revenue was primarily due to a 28% decrease in individual and family health insurance estimated membership as of December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016. The increase in Medicare commission revenue was primarily due to a 33% increase in Medicare estimated membership as of December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016.
Other revenue decreased $2.2 million, or 12%, in 2016, due to decreases of $1.4 million in licensing fees, $0.5 million in online sponsorship and advertising revenue and $0.3 million in lead generation revenue.
Cost of Revenue
Included in cost of revenue are payments related to health insurance plans sold to members who were referred to our website by marketing partners with whom we have revenue-sharing arrangements. In order to enter into a revenue-sharing arrangement, marketing partners must be licensed to sell health insurance in the state where the policy is sold. Costs related to revenue-sharing arrangements are expensed as the related revenue is recognized.
Additionally, cost of revenue includes the amortization of consideration we paid to certain broker partners in connection with the transfer of their health insurance members to us as the new broker of record on the underlying plans. These transfers include primarily Medicare plan members. Consideration for all book-of-business transfers is being amortized to cost of revenue as we recognize commission revenue related to the transferred members.
The following table presents our cost of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar and percentage changes from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Cost of revenue
|
$
|
4,178
|
|
|
$
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
3,176
|
|
|
$
|
(903
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
2,273
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
2017
compared to
2016
—Cost of revenue decreased
$0.9 million
in the 2017 compared to
2016
, due primarily to a
$0.4 million
decrease in amortization expense associated with the consideration we paid to a broker partner in connection with the transfer of several Medicare plan books-of-business to us whereby we became the broker of record on the underlying plans and a $0.4 million decrease in payments to marketing partners with whom we have revenue sharing arrangements for health insurance plans sold to members who were referred to our website.
2016 compared to 2015
—Cost of revenue decreased
$1.0 million
, or
24%
, in 2016 compared to 2015, due primarily to a $0.5 million decrease in payments related to health insurance policies sold to members who were referred to our website by marketing partners with whom we have revenue-sharing arrangements and a $0.4 million decrease in amortization expense associated with the consideration we paid to a broker partner in connection with the transfer of several Medicare plan books-of-business to us whereby we became the broker of record on the underlying policies.
Marketing and Advertising
Marketing and advertising expenses consist primarily of member acquisition expenses associated with our direct, marketing partner and online advertising member acquisition channels, in addition to compensation and other expenses related to marketing, business development, partner management, public relations and carrier relations personnel who support our offerings.
The following table presents our marketing and advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar and percentage changes from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Marketing and advertising
|
$
|
75,571
|
|
|
$
|
(3,358
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
72,213
|
|
|
$
|
(6,339
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
65,874
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
2017
compared
2016
—
Marketing and advertising expenses decreased
$6.3 million
, or
9%
, in 2017, primarily due to decreases of $7.8 million in variable advertising costs and $0.3 million in stock-based compensation, partially offset by increases of $1.2 million in personnel costs due to additional headcount and $0.6 million in consulting expenses. The decrease in variable advertising costs was largely attributable to decreases of $13.3 million in online advertising costs and $9.2 million in marketing partner channel costs, partially offset by a $14.7 million increase in direct marketing costs and was driven primarily by our strategy to shift our demand generation in the Medicare market to more cost-effective channels, as well as the lower volume of submitted individual and family applications compared to 2016.
2016 compared to 2015
—Marketing and advertising expenses decreased
$3.4 million
, or
4%
, in 2016, primarily due to decreases of $1.9 million in personnel costs resulting from lower headcount, including executive officer departures, $0.8 million in variable advertising costs and $0.7 million in stock-based compensation expense, largely due to reversal of stock-based compensation resulting from executive officer departures. The decrease in variable advertising costs resulted from decreases of $2.7 million in direct marketing expenses and $2.3 million in marketing partner channel costs, partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in online advertising costs.
Customer Care and Enrollment
Customer care and enrollment expenses primarily consist of compensation and benefits costs for personnel engaged in assistance to applicants who call our customer care center and for enrollment personnel who assist applicants during the enrollment process.
The following table presents our customer care and enrollment expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
, and
2017
and the dollar and percentage changes from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Customer care and enrollment
|
$
|
43,159
|
|
|
$
|
5,559
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,718
|
|
|
$
|
10,465
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,183
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
2017
compared to
2016
—
Customer care and enrollment expenses increased
$10.5 million
, or
21%
, in 2017 compared to
2016
, primarily due to growth in our Medicare and small group businesses, which resulted in increases of $6.2 million in personnel costs, $2.1 million in external call center costs, $1.2 million in licensing costs and $0.8 million in facilities and other operating costs.
2016 compared to 2015—
Customer care and enrollment expenses increased
$5.6 million
, or
13%
, in 2016 compared to 2015, largely due to increases of $4.1 million in personnel costs primarily relating to our Medicare business and $1.0 million in facilities and other operating costs.
Technology and Content
Technology and content expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits costs for personnel associated with developing and enhancing our website technology as well as maintaining our website. A majority of our technology and content group is located at our wholly-owned subsidiary in China, where technology development costs are generally lower than in the United States.
The following table presents our technology and content expenses for the years ended December 31,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar and percentage changes from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Technology and content
|
$
|
36,351
|
|
|
$
|
(3,602
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
32,749
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,889
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
2017
compared
2016
—
Technology and content expenses remained relatively flat in 2017 as a result of a $1.2 million increase in personnel costs, offset by decreases of $0.7 million in facilities and other operating costs and $0.4 million in stock-based compensation expense.
2016 compared to 2015—
Technology and content expenses decreased
$3.6 million
, or
10%
, in 2016 compared to 2015, due to a decrease in personnel costs resulting from lower headcount.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses include compensation and benefits costs for staff working in our executive, finance, investor relations, government affairs, legal, human resources, internal audit, facilities and internal information technology departments. These expenses also include fees paid for outside professional services, including audit, tax, legal, government affairs and information technology fees.
The following table presents our general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015
2016
and
2017
and the dollar and percentage changes from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
General and administrative
|
$
|
30,239
|
|
|
$
|
4,977
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,216
|
|
|
$
|
4,753
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
$
|
39,969
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
2017
compared to
2016
—
General and administrative expenses increased
$4.8 million
, or
13%
, in 2017, primarily due to increases of $3.2 million in stock-based compensation expense, $2.1 million in personnel costs largely due to higher headcount, $0.7 million in lobbying fees, and $0.4 million in facilities and other operating costs, partially offset by decreases of $1.2 million in legal fees and $0.4 million in consulting expenses.
2016 compared to 2015
—General and administrative expenses increased
$5.0 million
, or
16%
, in 2016 compared to 2015, due to increases of $1.9 million in personnel costs primarily resulting from severance and relocation costs related to executive officer changes, $0.9 million in stock-based compensation expense resulting from executive officer changes, $0.9 million in third party fees related to a review and analysis of strategic plans, $0.8 million in legal fees and $0.2 million in lobbying fees.
Acquisition Costs
During 2017 we incurred $0.6 million of costs associated with our acquisition of Wealth, Health and Life Advisors, LLC, which was completed on January 22, 2018.
Restructuring Charge (Benefit)
On March 10, 2015, we implemented an organizational restructuring and cost reduction plan. As part of the plan, we eliminated approximately 160 full-time positions, representing approximately 15% of our workforce primarily in our technology and content and customer care and enrollment groups, and to a lesser extent, in our marketing and advertising and general and administrative groups. We incurred a pre-tax restructuring charge of approximately $3.9 million for employee termination benefits and related costs and $0.6 million for facility and other termination costs. The majority of the restructuring charge was recorded in the first quarter of 2015, when the activities comprising the plan were substantially completed.
The following table presents our restructuring benefit for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar change from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Restructuring
|
$
|
4,541
|
|
|
$
|
(4,838
|
)
|
|
(107
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(297
|
)
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
In the second and third quarters of 2016, we reversed $0.3 million related to facility exit costs as we reoccupied office space we had previously vacated and were also released from a lease for other office space we had previously vacated.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
The following table presents our intangible asset amortization expense for the years December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar change from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
$
|
1,153
|
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
2017
compared to
2016
—
Amortization expense related to intangible assets purchased through our acquisition of PlanPrescriber was flat in 2017 compared to 2016.
2016 compared to 2015—
Amortization expense related to intangible assets purchased through our acquisition of PlanPrescriber decreased in 2016 compared to 2015, due to certain assets that were fully amortized compared to the prior period.
Other Income
(Expense), Net
The following table presents our other income (expense), net for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar change from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Other income (expense), net
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net, for the years ended 2015, 2016 and 2017 primarily consisted of interest income earned on our invested cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances, offset by administrative bank fees, investment management fees and interest expense on capital lease obligations.
2017 compared to 2016—
Other income (expense), net increased
$0.2 million
in 2017, primarily due to an increase in interest income.
2016 compared to 2015—
Other income (expense), net increased $0.1 million in 2016, primarily due to an increase in interest income.
Benefit from Income Taxes
The following table presents our provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
and the dollar change from the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
$
|
(843
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(871
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,884
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,755
|
)
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
2017 compared to 2016—
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Jobs Act, was signed into law resulting in significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Jobs Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax periods beginning after December 31, 2017; changes U.S international taxation from a
worldwide tax system to a territorial system; and imposes a one-time transition tax on untaxed cumulative foreign earnings and profits as of December 31, 2017. The Act also includes provisions for the elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax, or AMT, among other changes. We calculated our best estimate of the impact of the Jobs Act in our year end income tax provision in accordance with our understanding of the Jobs Act and guidance available as of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and recorded $2.3 million as additional income tax benefit in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. Of the $2.3 million, we recorded a provisional amount for 2017 included a benefit of $1.8 million related to the reversal of AMT credits, which are now refundable credits under the provisions of the Jobs Act and recorded as long-term receivables, which are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have also remeasured the deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rate at which they are expected to reverse in the future and recorded a $0.5 million benefit as a result of this remeasurement. The effects of other provisions of the Jobs Act are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, however, the final impact of the Jobs Act may differ from our estimates, due to, among other things, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, additional guidance that may be issued, and resulting actions we may take. In addition, the benefit from income taxes in 2017, includes a $1.7 million decrease in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the related statute of limitations, partially offset by a provision for income taxes related to a minimum taxes and a foreign tax rate differential.
2016 compared to 2015—
We recorded a benefit from income taxes of $0.8 million and $0.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The benefit from income taxes in 2015 and 2016, primarily related to a decrease in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the related statute of limitations, partially offset by a provision for income taxes related to a minimum taxes and a foreign tax rate differential.
Segment Information
We report segment information based on how our chief executive officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, or CODM, regularly reviews our operating results, allocates resources, and makes decisions regarding our business operations. The performance measures of our operating segments include revenues and profit and loss. Our business structure is comprised of two operating segments:
•
Medicare and
•
Individual, Family and Small Business.
Our CODM does not separately evaluate assets by segment, and therefore assets by segment are not presented.
The Medicare segment consists primarily of commissions earned from our sale of Medicare-related health insurance plans, including Medicare Advantage, Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, and to a lesser extent, ancillary products sold to our Medicare-eligible customers, including but not limited to, dental and vision insurance, as well as our advertising program that allows Medicare-related carriers to purchase advertising on a separate website developed, hosted and maintained by us and our delivery and sale to third parties of Medicare-related health insurance leads generated by our ecommerce platforms and our marketing activities.
The Individual, Family and Small Business segment consists primarily of commissions earned from our sale of individual and family and small business health insurance plans and ancillary products sold to our non-Medicare-eligible customers, including but not limited to, dental, vision, life, short term disability and long term disability insurance. To a lesser extent, the Individual, Family and Small Business segment consists of amounts earned from our online sponsorship program that allows carriers to purchase advertising space in specific markets in a sponsorship area on our website, our licensing to third parties the use of our health insurance ecommerce technology and our delivery and sale to third parties of individual and family health insurance leads generated by our ecommerce platforms and our marketing activities.
Marketing and advertising, customer care and enrollment, technology and content and general and administrative operating expenses that are directly attributable to a segment are reported within the applicable segment. Indirect marketing and advertising, customer care and enrollment and technology and content operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on usage. Other indirect general and administrative operating expenses are managed in a corporate shared services environment and, since they are not the responsibility of segment operating management, are not allocated to the operating segments and instead reported within Corporate.
Segment profit (loss) is calculated as total revenue for the applicable segment less direct and allocated marketing and advertising, customer care and enrollment, technology and content and general and administrative operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expense and amortization of intangible assets.
The following table presents summary results of our operating segments for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare
|
$
|
63,163
|
|
|
$
|
17,106
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
$
|
80,269
|
|
|
22,315
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
$
|
102,584
|
|
Individual, Family and Small Business
|
126,378
|
|
|
(19,687
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
106,691
|
|
|
(36,920
|
)
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
69,771
|
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
189,541
|
|
|
$
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
186,960
|
|
|
(14,605
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
172,355
|
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare segment loss
|
$
|
(23,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,857
|
)
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
(33,141
|
)
|
|
14,381
|
|
|
(43
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(18,760
|
)
|
Individual, Family and Small Business segment profit
|
59,499
|
|
|
8,406
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
67,905
|
|
|
(37,478
|
)
|
|
(55
|
)%
|
|
30,427
|
|
Total segment profit (loss)
|
36,215
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
34,764
|
|
|
(23,097
|
)
|
|
(66
|
)%
|
|
11,667
|
|
Corporate
|
(25,135
|
)
|
|
(3,936
|
)
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
(29,071
|
)
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
(27,590
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
(6,889
|
)
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
(7,266
|
)
|
|
(2,428
|
)
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
(9,694
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
609
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
(3,539
|
)
|
|
702
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
(2,837
|
)
|
Restructuring (charge) benefit
|
(4,541
|
)
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
(107
|
)%
|
|
297
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|
113
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
45
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
127
|
%
|
|
102
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
221
|
%
|
|
327
|
|
Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
$
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
(147
|
)
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
(23,414
|
)
|
|
407
|
%
|
|
$
|
(29,167
|
)
|
2017 compared to 2016
Revenue
Revenue from our Medicare segment increased
$22.3 million
, or
28%
, in 2017 largely due to a
$20.8 million
increase in commission revenue and
$1.5 million
increase in other revenue. The increase in Medicare commission revenue was primarily attributable to a
26%
increase in estimated Medicare membership as of December 31, 2017 as well as the receipt of increased renewal commissions per member on Medicare Advantage plans during the first quarter of 2017. Estimated Medicare membership as of December 31, 2017 increased due to higher application submissions and improved conversion rates.
Revenue from our Individual, Family and Small Business segment decreased
$36.9 million
, or
35%
, in 2017, primarily attributable to a
$33.2 million
decrease in commission revenue and a
$3.7 million
decrease in other revenue. The decrease in Individual, Family and Small Business commission revenue was primarily due to a
38%
decline in estimated individual and family health insurance membership in 2017 primarily attributable to lower application submission and a decrease in the membership retention rate. The decrease in other revenue also resulted from the decrease in individual and family health insurance applications submitted during 2017.
Segment Profit (Loss)
Loss from our Medicare segment was
$18.8 million
in 2017, a
$14.4 million
, or
43%
, improvement compared to a loss of
$33.1 million
in 2016. The improvement in the Medicare segment in 2017 was primarily due to a
$22.3 million
increase in revenue, partially offset by a
$7.8 million
increase in operating expenses excluding stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expenses and amortization of intangible assets. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in personnel costs associated with higher headcount, an increase in variable advertising expense associated with the increase in applications and an increase in licensing sales agents.
Profit from our Individual, Family and Small Business segment was
$30.4 million
in 2017, a
$37.5 million
, or
55%
, decrease compared to profit of
$67.9 million
from the Individual, Family and Small Business segment in 2016. The decrease in profit from the Individual, Family and Small Business segment in 2017 was primarily due to a
$36.9 million
decrease in revenue.
2016 compared to 2015
Revenue
Revenue from our Medicare segment increased
$17.1 million
, or
27%
, in 2016 compared to 2015 largely attributable to a $16.8 million increase in commission revenue. The increase in commission revenue was primarily due to a 33% increase in Medicare estimated membership for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
Revenue from our Individual, Family and Small Business segment decreased
$19.7 million
, or
16%
, in 2016 compared to 2015. The decrease in commission revenue was primarily due to 28% decrease in individual and family health insurance estimated membership in 2016 compared to 2015.
Segment Profit (Loss)
Loss from our Medicare segment was
$33.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2016, a $9.8 million, or 42% increase compared to a loss of $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in loss in the Medicare segment in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to an increase in marketing and advertising and customer care and enrollment expenses in the Medicare segment as we continued to invest in growth of our Medicare business, and was only partially offset by an increase in revenue from the Medicare segment.
Profit from our Individual, Family and Small Business segment was
$67.9 million
in 2016, a
$8.4 million
, or
14%
increase compared to profit of
$59.5 million
from the Individual, Family and Small Business segment in 2015. The increase in profit from the Individual, Family and Small Business segment in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in marketing and advertising expense from the Individual, Family and Small Business segment, partially offset by the decrease in revenue from the Individual, Family and Small Business segment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At
December 31, 2017
, our cash and cash equivalents totaled
$40.3 million
. Cash equivalents, which are comprised of financial instruments with an original maturity of 90 days or less from the date of purchase, primarily consist of money market funds. At
December 31, 2016
, our cash and cash equivalents totaled
$61.8 million
. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents reflects
$15.5 million
used in operating activities,
$5.1 million
used to purchase property and equipment and other assets and
$0.9 million
used in the net-share settlement of equity awards.
As of
December 31, 2017
, we have in treasury
574,107
shares that were previously surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholdings in connection with the vesting of certain restricted stock units. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, we had a total of
11,135,590
shares and
11,237,995
shares, respectively, held in treasury.
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$
|
13,696
|
|
|
$
|
4,083
|
|
|
$
|
(15,541
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
$
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,078
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
$
|
577
|
|
|
$
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
(870
|
)
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities primarily consists of net income (loss), adjusted for certain non-cash items including depreciation and amortization; amortization of intangible assets, internally developed software and book-of-business consideration; stock-based compensation expense and the effect of changes in working capital and other activities.
Our commission receipts depend upon the timing of our receipt of commission reports and associated commission payments from health insurance carriers. If we were to experience a delay in receiving a commission payment from a health insurance carrier at the end of a quarter, our operating cash flows for that quarter could be adversely impacted. Additionally, commission override payments are reported to us in a more irregular pattern than premium commissions. For example, a carrier may make a commission override payment to us on an annual basis, which would positively impact our cash flows in the quarter the payment is received.
A significant portion of our marketing and advertising expenses is driven by the number of health insurance applications submitted on our ecommerce platform. Since our marketing and advertising costs are expensed and generally paid as incurred and the cash earned from approved applications is recognized and paid as commissions are subsequently reported to us, our operating cash flows could be adversely impacted by a substantial increase in the volume of applications submitted during a quarter or positively impacted by a substantial decline in the volume of applications submitted during a quarter. During the Medicare annual enrollment period, we experience an increase in the number of submitted Medicare-related health insurance applications and marketing and advertising expenses compared to outside of Medicare annual enrollment periods. Similarly, during open enrollment periods for individual and family health insurance plans, we experience an increase in the number of submitted individual and family plan health insurance applications and marketing and advertising expenses compared to outside of open enrollment periods. The timing of open enrollment periods for individual and family health insurance and the Medicare annual enrollment period for Medicare-related health insurance affect the positive or negative impacts of our cash flows during each quarter.
Marketing and advertising costs decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a decrease in variable advertising costs as a result of lower application volumes for individual and family health insurance and a decrease in Medicare online advertising expense, partially offset by an increase in expenses from our direct and marketing partner channels. Consistent with prior years, during the fourth quarter of 2017, marketing and advertising costs increased compared to the third quarter of 2017 due to an increase in submitted applications for Medicare plans during the annual enrollment period, and to a lesser extent, an increase in submitted applications for individual and family health insurance during the open enrollment period.
All Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug policies are renewed on January 1, resulting in our recording substantially all Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plan renewal commission revenue in the first quarter. As a result, we do not recognize significant Medicare renewal commission revenue in the second, third and fourth quarters of each year. Typically, renewal commissions for Medicare Advantage products are paid monthly. As a result, the majority of renewal commissions for Medicare Advantage products has been collected in quarters subsequent to the first quarter.
Year Ended December 31, 2017—
Cash used in operating activities was
$15.5 million
during 2017, consisting of a net loss of
$25.4 million
and cash used by operating assets and liabilities and other activities of
$5.8 million
, partially offset adjustments for non-cash items of
$15.7 million
. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of
$9.7 million
of stock-based compensation expense,
$3.7 million
of amortization of intangible assets, internally-developed software and book-of-business consideration and
$2.8 million
of depreciation and amortization. The cash decrease resulting from changes in net
operating assets and liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily consisted of decreases of
$2.3 million
in other liabilities,
$3.1 million
in accrued marketing expenses,
$1.9 million
in accounts payable and
$0.6 million
in deferred revenue, partially offset by increases of
$4.6 million
in accrued compensation and benefits,
$1.9 million
in prepaid expenses and other current assets and
$0.7 million
in accounts receivable.
Year Ended December 31, 2016—
Our operating activities provided cash of
4.1 million
during the year ended December 31, 2016 and consisted of adjustments for non-cash items of
14.2 million
, partially offset by a net loss of
$4.9 million
and cash used by operating assets and liabilities and other activities of
$5.3 million
. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of
$7.3 million
of stock-based compensation expense,
$3.6 million
of amortization of internally-developed software, book-of-business consideration and intangible assets and
$3.5 million
of depreciation and amortization. The cash decrease resulting from changes in net operating assets and liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily consisted of decreases of
$3.5 million
in accrued marketing expenses,
$3.5 million
in accrued compensation and benefits,
$1.1 million
in accrued expense and other liabilities and
$0.5 million
in prepaid expenses and other current assets. These decreases were partially offset by increases of
$2.2 million
in accounts payable,
$0.6 million
in deferred revenue and
$0.4 million
in accounts receivable.
Year Ended December 31, 2015—
Our operating activities generated cash of
$13.7 million
during the year ended December 31, 2015 and consisted of adjustments for non-cash items of
$15.0 million
and cash used by operating assets and liabilities and other activities of
$3.3 million
, partially offset by a net loss of
$4.8 million
. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of
$7.0 million
of stock-based compensation expense,
$4.1 million
of depreciation and amortization and
$3.8 million
of amortization of internally-developed software, book-of-business consideration and intangible assets. The cash increase resulting from changes in net operating assets and liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily consisted of increases of
$6.2 million
in accrued compensation and benefits,
$2.0 million
in accrued marketing expenses and
$1.0 million
in prepaid expense and other assets, partially offset by decreases of
$2.9 million
in accounts payable,
$1.4 million
in accounts receivable,
$1.2 million
in other current liabilities and
$0.6 million
in deferred revenue.
Investing Activities
Our investing activities primarily consist of purchases of computer hardware and software to enhance our website and customer care operations, leasehold improvements related to facilities expansion, internal-use software and the purchase of certain intangible assets.
Year Ended December 31, 2017
—Net cash used in investing activities of
$5.1 million
during 2017 was due to
$3.2 million
in capitalized internal-use software and website development costs and
$1.9 million
used to purchase property and equipment and other assets.
Year Ended December 31, 2016
-Net cash used in investing activities of
$3.7 million
during the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to
$1.8 million
in capitalized internal-use software and website development costs and
$1.9 million
used to purchase property and equipment and other assets.
Year Ended December 31, 2015
-Net cash used in investing activities of
$3.0 million
during the year ended December 31, 2015 was due to
$1.1 million
in capitalized internal-use software and website development costs and
$1.9 million
used to purchases property and equipment and other assets.
Financing Activities
Year Ended December 31, 2017
—Net cash used in financing activities of
$0.9 million
during 2017 was primarily due to
$1.0 million
proceeds from the exercise of stock options and
$1.8 million
used to net-share settle the tax obligation related to vesting equity awards.
Year Ended December 31, 2016
—Net cash used in financing activities of
$1.3 million
during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to
$1.2 million
used to net-share settle the tax obligation related to vesting equity awards.
Year Ended December 31, 2015
—Net cash provided by financing activities of
$0.6 million
during the year ended December 31, 2015 was due to proceeds of
$1.6 million
from the exercise of stock options offset by
$0.9 million
used to net- settle the tax obligation related to the vesting equity awards.
Future Needs
On January 22, 2018, we completed our acquisition of Wealth, Health and Life Advisors, LLC, more commonly known as GoMedigap, a technology-enabled provider of Medicare Supplement enrollment services. This strategic acquisition significantly enhances our growing presence in the Medicare Supplement market, puts us in a stronger position with carriers and strategic partners and allows us to accelerate our projected Medicare plan enrollment growth in 2018 and beyond. The acquisition price paid at closing of the transaction consisted of cash of $15.0 million, less $0.1 million cash acquired, and approximately 294,637 shares of our common stock. In addition, we are obligated to pay an additional $20 million in cash and 589,275 shares of our common stock, subject to the terms of the acquisition agreement and upon final determination of the achievement of certain milestones in 2018 and 2019.
We believe that cash generated from operations and our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations, including the additional amounts we are obligated to pay subject to the terms of the acquisition agreement with GoMedigap, for at least twelve months after the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our expected membership and retention rates, our level of investment in technology, marketing and advertising and our customer care initiatives. In addition, our cash position could be impacted by further acquisitions and investments we make to pursue our growth strategy. We currently do not have any bank debt, line of credit facilities or other borrowing arrangements. To the extent that available funds are insufficient to fund our future activities, we plan to raise additional capital through bank debt, line of credit facilities or public or private equity or debt financing to the extent such funding sources are available.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents a summary of our future minimum payments under non-cancellable operating lease agreements and contractual service and licensing obligations as of
December 31, 2017
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
Service and Licensing Obligations
|
|
Total Obligations
|
2018
|
$
|
3,617
|
|
|
$
|
1,998
|
|
|
$
|
5,615
|
|
2019
|
2,996
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
2020
|
2,994
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
3,324
|
|
2021
|
1,457
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
2022
|
1,501
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
Thereafter
|
651
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
651
|
|
Total commitments
|
$
|
13,216
|
|
|
$
|
3,189
|
|
|
$
|
16,405
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
We lease our operating facilities and certain of our equipment and furniture and fixtures under various operating leases, the latest of which expires in July 2023. Certain of these leases have free or escalating rent payment provisions. We recognize rent expense on our operating leases on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, although actual cash payment obligations under certain of these agreements fluctuate over the terms of the agreements.
In March 2012, we entered into an agreement to lease a building in Mountain View, California, adjacent to our headquarters office. The term of the operating lease is ten years from the date the building was delivered to us in August 2013. The base rent increases annually by
3%
. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments related to this operating lease total
$4.2 million
over the remaining term of the lease plus our proportionate share of certain operating expenses, insurance costs and taxes for each calendar year during the lease.
In April 2013, we entered into an agreement to lease approximately 20,000 square feet of office space in Westford, Massachusetts. The lease commenced in July 2013 and is for a term of
5 years and 3 months
. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments totaled approximately
$0.4 million
over the remaining term of the lease. In March 2018, we announced we will be closing this facility in the first half of 2018.
In August 2014, we renewed our agreement to lease and expanded to approximately 50,000 square feet of office space in Gold River, California. The lease commenced in August 2014 and is for a term of
4 years and 5 months
. In 2015, we vacated
approximately
11,200 square feet
of this leased office space as a result of a workforce reduction. We reoccupied approximately
5,400 square feet
of this previously vacated office space in 2016. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments related to this operating lease totaled approximately
$3.4 million
for the remaining term of the lease.
In August 2017, we entered into an agreement to amend our lease of approximately
28,000
square feet of office space in South Jordan, Utah. This amendment extends the term of this facility lease by 5 years and 3 months from January 2018 to March 2023. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments related to this operating lease totaled approximately
$3.4 million
for the remaining term of the lease.
Service and Licensing Obligations
We have entered into service and licensing agreements with third party vendors to provide various services, including network access, equipment maintenance and software licensing. The terms of these services and licensing agreements are generally up to three years. We record the related service and licensing expenses on a straight-line basis, although actual cash payment obligations under certain of these agreements fluctuate over the terms of the agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt. Additionally, we are not a party to any derivative contracts or synthetic leases.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note 1 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for recently issued accounting standards that could have an effect on us.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2016 and
2017
, our cash and cash equivalents were invested as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Cash
(1)
|
$
|
4,066
|
|
|
$
|
5,098
|
|
Money market funds
(2)
|
57,715
|
|
|
35,195
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
61,781
|
|
|
$
|
40,293
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
We deposit our cash and cash equivalents in accounts with major banks and financial institutions and such deposits are in excess of federally insured limits. We also have deposits with major banks in China that are denominated in both U.S. dollars and Chinese Yuan Renminbi and are not insured by the U.S. federal government.
|
|
|
(2)
|
At December 31, 2016 and
2017
money market funds consisted of investments in U.S. government-sponsored enterprise bonds and discount notes, U.S. government treasury bills and notes and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government obligations.
|
We do not require collateral or other security for our accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2017, two customers represented
23%
and
22%
, respectively, for a combined total of
45%
of our
$9.9 million
outstanding accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2016, three customers represented
23%
,
20%
and
11%
, respectively, or a combined total of
54%
, of our
$9.2 million
outstanding accounts receivable balance. No other customers represented 10% or more of our total accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2017
. We believe the potential for collection issues with any of our customers was minimal as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, our estimate for uncollectible amounts at December 31, 2017 was not material.
Significant Customers
Substantially all revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
, and
2017
was generated from customers located in the United States. Carriers representing 10% or more of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2016
and
2017
are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Humana
|
23
|
%
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
22
|
%
|
UnitedHealthcare
1
|
11
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
Aetna
2
|
10
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
UnitedHealthcare also includes other carriers owned by UnitedHealthcare.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aetna also includes other carriers owned by Aetna.
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
To date, substantially all of our revenue has been derived from transactions denominated in United States Dollars. We have exposure to adverse changes in exchange rates associated with operating expenses of our foreign operations, which are denominated in Chinese Yuan Renminbi. Foreign currency fluctuations have not had a material impact historically on our results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that future fluctuations will not have material adverse effects on our results of operations. We have not engaged in any foreign currency hedging or other derivative transactions to date.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
73
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
74
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
|
75
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
76
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
77
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
78
|
The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in
Note 10
to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption “
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
.”
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of eHealth, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of eHealth, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated
March 16, 2018
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2000.
Redwood City, California
March 16, 2018
EHEALTH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
61,781
|
|
|
$
|
40,293
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
9,213
|
|
|
9,894
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
5,148
|
|
|
4,845
|
|
Total current assets
|
76,142
|
|
|
55,032
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
5,608
|
|
|
4,705
|
|
Other assets
|
4,473
|
|
|
7,317
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
8,580
|
|
|
7,540
|
|
Goodwill
|
14,096
|
|
|
14,096
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
108,899
|
|
|
$
|
88,690
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
5,112
|
|
|
$
|
3,246
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
10,920
|
|
|
15,498
|
|
Accrued marketing expenses
|
7,158
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
959
|
|
|
385
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
3,775
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
27,924
|
|
|
26,647
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
3,374
|
|
|
900
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; Authorized shares: 10,000,000; Issued and outstanding shares: none
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock: $0.001 par value; Authorized shares: 100,000,000; Issued shares: 29,492,141 and 29,879,952 at December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively; Outstanding shares: 18,356,551 and 18,641,957 at December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
272,778
|
|
|
281,706
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost: 11,135,590 and 11,237,995 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively
|
(199,998
|
)
|
|
(199,998
|
)
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
4,616
|
|
|
(20,796
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
176
|
|
|
201
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
77,601
|
|
|
61,143
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
108,899
|
|
|
$
|
88,690
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EHEALTH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission
|
$
|
171,257
|
|
|
$
|
170,850
|
|
|
$
|
158,424
|
|
Other
|
18,284
|
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
13,931
|
|
Total revenue
|
189,541
|
|
|
186,960
|
|
|
172,355
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
4,178
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
75,571
|
|
|
72,213
|
|
|
65,874
|
|
Customer care and enrollment
|
43,159
|
|
|
48,718
|
|
|
59,183
|
|
Technology and content
|
36,351
|
|
|
32,749
|
|
|
32,889
|
|
General and administrative
|
30,239
|
|
|
35,216
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
Acquisition costs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
621
|
|
Restructuring charge (benefit)
|
4,541
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
1,153
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
195,192
|
|
|
192,815
|
|
|
201,849
|
|
Loss from operations
|
(5,651
|
)
|
|
(5,855
|
)
|
|
(29,494
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
45
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
327
|
|
Loss before benefit from income taxes
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
(29,167
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
(843
|
)
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
(3,755
|
)
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
Weighted-average number of shares used in per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
Diluted
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes
|
14
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
25
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(4,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,387
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EHEALTH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Additional Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
28,776
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
259,007
|
|
|
(10,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(199,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,261
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
73,478
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock options and release of vested restricted stock units, net of cash used to net settle equity awards
|
395
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
662
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,030
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,030
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,763
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
29,171
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
266,699
|
|
|
(11,026
|
)
|
|
(199,998
|
)
|
|
9,498
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
76,421
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock options and release of vested restricted stock units, net of cash used to net settle equity awards
|
321
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,187
|
)
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,187
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,882
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
29,492
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
272,778
|
|
|
(11,136
|
)
|
|
(199,998
|
)
|
|
4,616
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
77,601
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock options and release of vested restricted stock units, net of cash used to net settle equity awards
|
388
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
25
|
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(25,412
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
29,880
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
281,706
|
|
|
(11,238
|
)
|
|
$
|
(199,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,796
|
)
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
61,143
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
EHEALTH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
4,148
|
|
|
3,539
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
Amortization of internally developed software
|
627
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
Amortization of book-of-business consideration
|
2,006
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
1,153
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
7,002
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
101
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
Other non-cash items
|
106
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
434
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
997
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
(2,949
|
)
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
(1,866
|
)
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
6,180
|
|
|
(3,466
|
)
|
|
4,578
|
|
Accrued marketing expenses
|
1,991
|
|
|
(3,540
|
)
|
|
(3,070
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
(642
|
)
|
|
567
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
Accrued restructuring charges
|
433
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
(2,283
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
13,696
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
(15,541
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized internal-use software and website development costs
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
(3,210
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment and other assets
|
(1,879
|
)
|
|
(1,889
|
)
|
|
(1,868
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
(3,726
|
)
|
|
(5,078
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from exercise of common stock options
|
1,572
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Cash used to net-share settle equity awards
|
(922
|
)
|
|
(1,248
|
)
|
|
(1,802
|
)
|
Principal payments in connection with capital leases
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
577
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
(870
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
18
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
11,295
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
(21,488
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
51,415
|
|
|
62,710
|
|
|
61,781
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
62,710
|
|
|
$
|
61,781
|
|
|
$
|
40,293
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations incurred
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business—
eHealth, Inc. (the “Company,” “eHealth,” “we” or “us”) is a leading private health insurance exchange for individuals, families and small businesses in the United States. Through our website addresses (
www.eHealth.com
,
www.eHealthInsurance.com
,
www.eHealthMedicare.com, www.Medicare.com, www.PlanPrescriber.com and www.GoMedigap.com)
, consumers can get quotes from leading health insurance carriers, compare plans side-by-side, and apply for and purchase Medicare-related, individual and family, small business and ancillary health insurance plans. We actively market the availability of Medicare-related insurance plans and offer Medicare plan comparison tools and educational materials for Medicare-related insurance plans, including Medicare Advantage, Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. Our ecommerce technology also enables us to deliver consumers’ health insurance applications electronically to health insurance carriers. We are licensed to market and sell health insurance in all
50
states and the District of Columbia.
Principles of Consolidation —
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of eHealth, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Operating Segments —
We report segment information based on how our chief executive officer, who is our chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), regularly reviews our operating results, allocates resources and makes decisions regarding our business operations. The performance measures of our segments include total revenue and profit (loss). Our business structure is comprised of
two
operating segments
•
Medicare and
•
Individual, Family and Small Business
The Medicare segment consists primarily of commissions earned from our sale of Medicare-related health insurance plans, including Medicare Advantage, Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, and to a lesser extent, ancillary products sold to our Medicare-eligible customers, including but not limited to, dental and vision insurance, as well as our advertising program that allows Medicare-related carriers to purchase advertising on a separate website developed, hosted and maintained by us and our delivery and sale to third parties of Medicare-related health insurance leads generated by our ecommerce platforms and our marketing activities.
The Individual, Family and Small Business segment consists primarily of commissions earned from our sale of individual and family and small business health insurance plans and ancillary products sold to our non-Medicare-eligible customers, including but not limited to, dental, vision, life, short term disability and long term disability insurance. To a lesser extent, the Individual, Family and Small Business segment consists of amounts earned from our online sponsorship program that allows carriers to purchase advertising space in specific markets in a sponsorship area on our website, our licensing to third parties the use of our health insurance ecommerce technology and our delivery and sale to third parties of individual and family health insurance leads generated by our ecommerce platforms and our marketing activities.
Marketing and advertising, customer care and enrollment, technology and content and general and administrative operating expenses that are directly attributable to a segment are reported within the applicable segment. Indirect marketing and advertising, customer care and enrollment and technology and content operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on usage. Other indirect general and administrative operating expenses are managed in a corporate shared services environment and, since they are not the responsibility of segment operating management, are not allocated to the
two
operating segments and are presented as a reconciling item to our consolidated financial results.
Segment profit (loss) is calculated as total revenue for the applicable segment less direct and allocated marketing and advertising, customer care and enrollment, technology and content and general and administrative operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expense and amortization of intangible assets.
Use of Estimates —
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to, but not limited to, the useful lives of intangible assets, fair value of investments, fair value of our acquired Medicare books-of-business, recoverability of intangible assets, estimates for commission forfeitures, valuation allowance for deferred income taxes, provision for income taxes and the assumptions used in determining stock-based compensation. We base
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
our estimates of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications —
For presentation purposes, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the reporting in the current period financial statements. Specifically, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, we reclassified
$0.6 million
and
$0.8 million
, respectively, of operating expenses related to our licensing department, which was previously reported as general and administrative expense, to customer care and enrollment expense. This reclassification did not affect previously reported net loss, cash flows or stockholders' equity.
Cash Equivalents—
We consider all investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at fair value.
Property and Equipment—
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Capital lease amortization expenses are included in depreciation expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
Office equipment and furniture
|
|
5 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lesser of useful life (typically 5 to 10 years) or related lease term
|
Maintenance and minor replacements are expensed as incurred.
See
Note 2
- Balance Sheet Accounts
of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information regarding our property and equipment.
Business Combinations —
We allocate the fair value of the purchase consideration of our acquired businesses to the tangible assets, liabilities and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets—
Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration paid over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. In the event that we realign our reporting units, we allocate our goodwill to the new reporting units using the relative fair value approach. We test our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Factors that we consider in deciding when to perform an impairment test include significant negative industry or economic trends or significant changes or planned changes in our use of the intangible assets.
We realigned our reporting units into
two
operating segments during the year ended December 31, 2016, at which time we allocated
$3.7 million
and
$10.4 million
of the carrying value of the goodwill to the Medicare and Individual, Family and Small Business segments, respectively, based on the relative fair value of the operating segments. We continued to report the same
two
segments during the year ended December 31, 2017 and no goodwill impairment has been identified in any of the years presented.
Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential reduction in their fair values below their respective carrying amounts. Intangible assets with finite useful lives, which include purchased technology, pharmacy and customer relationships, trade names, and certain trademarks, are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Goodwill and intangible assets are considered non-financial assets and therefore, subsequent to their initial recognition are not revalued at fair value each reporting period unless an impairment charge is recognized.
We must make subjective judgments in determining the independent cash flows that can be related to specific asset groupings. In addition, we must make subjective judgments regarding the remaining useful lives of assets with finite useful lives. When we determine that the useful life of an asset is shorter than we had originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
amortization over the assets’ new, remaining useful life. We evaluated the remaining useful lives of our intangible assets with finite lives and determined no material adjustments to the remaining lives were required.
Book-of-Business Transfers—
We have entered into several agreements with a broker partner, whereby the partner transferred certain of its existing Medicare plan members to us as the broker of record on the underlying policies. The first of these book-of-business transfers occurred in November 2010 and the most recent in June 2012. Total consideration for these books-of-business amounted to
$13.9 million
. Consideration for these books-of-business is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The consideration, which was based on the discounted commissions expected to be received over the remaining life of each transferred Medicare plan member, is being amortized to cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and is presented as amortization of book-of-business consideration in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as we recognize commission revenue related to the transferred Medicare plan members. The amount of consideration we amortize to cost of revenue each quarter is proportional to the amount of commission revenue we recognize on the underlying policies each quarter in relation to the total amount of remaining commission revenue expected to be recognized. Amortization expense recorded to cost of
revenue for these books-of-business for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 totaled
$2.0 million
,
$1.6 million
and
$1.2 million
, respectively.
Other Long-Lived Assets—
We evaluate other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Revenue Recognition—
We recognize revenue for our services when each of the following four criteria is met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Our revenue is primarily comprised of compensation paid to us by health insurance carriers related to insurance plans that have been purchased by a member who used our service. We define a member as an individual currently covered by an insurance plan, including individual and family, Medicare-related, small business and ancillary plans, for which we are entitled to receive compensation from an insurance carrier.
For both Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, we receive a fixed, annual commission payment from insurance carriers once the plan is approved by the carrier and either a fixed, monthly or annual commission payment beginning with and subsequent to the second plan year. Additionally, commission rates may be higher in the first twelve months of the plan if the plan is the first Medicare Advantage or Medicare Part D prescription drug plan issued to the member. In the first plan year of a Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, after the health insurance carrier approves the application but during the effective year of the plan, we are paid a fixed commission that is prorated for the number of months remaining in the calendar year. Additionally, if the plan is the first Medicare Advantage or Medicare Part D plan issued to the member, we may receive a higher commission rate that covers a full twelve-month period, regardless of the month the plan was effective. We earn commission revenue for Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans for which we are the broker of record, typically until either the policy is cancelled or we otherwise do not remain the agent on the policy. We recognize commission revenue for both Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans for the entire plan year once the annual or first monthly commission amount for the plan year is reported to us by the carrier, net of an estimate for future forfeiture amounts due to plan cancellations. For commissions paid to us on a monthly basis, we record a receivable for the commission amounts to be received over the remainder of the plan year, net of an estimate for commission amounts not expected to be collected due to plan cancellations, which is included in Accounts Receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We continue to receive the commission payments from the relevant insurance carrier typically until either the policy is cancelled or we otherwise do not remain the agent on the policy. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement when we have a commission agreement with a health insurance carrier. Our services are complete when a carrier has approved an application in the initial year and when a member has renewed in a renewal year. The seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured when a carrier has approved an application and the carrier reports to us the annual or first monthly renewal commission amount for each plan year.
For individual and family, Medicare Supplement, small business and ancillary plans, our compensation generally represents a flat amount per member per month or a percentage of the premium amount collected by the carrier during the period that a member maintains coverage under a plan (commissions) and, to a much lesser extent, override commissions that health insurance carriers pay us for achieving certain objectives. Premium-based commissions are reported to us after the premiums are collected by the carrier, generally on a monthly basis. We generally continue to receive the commission payment
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
from the relevant insurance carrier until the health insurance plan is cancelled or we otherwise do not remain the agent on the policy. We recognize commission revenue for individual and family, Medicare Supplement, small business and ancillary plans as the commissions are reported to us by the carrier, net of an estimate for future forfeiture amounts due to policy cancellations. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement when we have a commission agreement with a health insurance carrier, a carrier reports to us that it has approved an application submitted through our ecommerce platform and the applicant starts making payments on the plan. Our services are complete when a carrier has approved an application. The seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured when commission amounts have been reported to us by a carrier.
We recognize individual and family, small business and ancillary commission override revenue when reported to us by a carrier based on the actual attainment of predetermined target sales levels or other objectives as determined by the carrier. Commission override revenue, which we recognize on the same basis as individual and family, small business and ancillary commissions, is generally reported to us in a more irregular pattern than such commissions.
Commissions for all health insurance plans we sell are reported to us by a cash payment and commission statement. We generally receive these communications simultaneously. In instances when we receive the cash payment and commission statement separately and in different accounting periods, we recognize revenue in the period that we receive the earliest communication, provided we receive the second corroborating communication shortly following the end of the accounting period. If the second corroborating communication is not received shortly following the end of the accounting period, we recognize revenue in the period the second communication is received. During 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a regulation prohibiting carriers from paying commissions during the fourth quarter on Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans sold during the fourth quarter with an effective date in the following year. During the fourth quarters of 2015, 2016 and 2017, we recognized revenue for policies included on a commission statement received for those periods, respectively, for which payment was received shortly after year-end and in connection with the carriers’ normal payment cycle during the first quarters of 2016, 2017 and 2018. We use the data in the commission statements to help identify the members for which we are receiving a commission payment and the amount received for each member, and to estimate future forfeiture amounts due to policy cancellations. As a result, we recognize the net amount of compensation earned as the agent in the transaction. Changes in our historical trends would result in changes to our estimated forfeitures in future periods. There were no changes in our average forfeiture rates or reporting time lag during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, which had a material impact on our estimate for forfeitures.
Certain commission amounts are subject to forfeiture if the plan is subsequently cancelled and either the carrier takes back all or a portion of the commission they have paid to us or we will no longer receive monthly commission payments for the remainder of the plan year. We record an estimate for these forfeitures based on our historical cancellation experience using data provided on commission statements. Policy cancellations and the commission amounts, if any, to be taken back by the carrier are typically reported to us by health insurance carriers several months after the policy’s cancellation date. Our estimate for forfeitures payable to a carrier, which is included in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, includes an estimate of both the reporting time lag and the forfeiture amount, based on our historical experience by policy type. Similarly, our estimate for commission amounts not expected to be collected due to policy cancellations, which is recorded as a reduction of accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, includes an estimate of the annual policy cancellation rate, based on our historical experience by policy type.
Other Revenue
Our sponsorship and advertising program allows carriers to purchase advertising space in specific markets in a sponsorship area on our website. In return, we are typically paid a monthly fee, which is recognized over the period that advertising is displayed, and often a performance fee based on metrics such as submitted health insurance applications, which is recognized when the earned amounts are fixed and determinable. We also offer Medicare advertising services, which include website development, hosting and maintenance. In these instances, we are typically paid a fixed, up-front fee, which we recognize as revenue over the service period.
Our commercial technology licensing business allows carriers the use of our ecommerce platform to offer their own health insurance policies on their websites and agents to utilize our technology to power their online quoting, content and application submission processes. Typically, we are paid a one-time implementation fee, which we recognize on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the customer relationship (generally the initial term of the agreement), commencing once the technology is available for use by the third party, and a performance fee based on metrics such as submitted health insurance
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
applications. The metrics used to calculate performance fees for both sponsorship and advertising and technology licensing are based on performance criteria that are either measured based on data tracked by us, or based on data tracked by the third party. In instances where the performance criteria data is tracked by us, we recognize revenue in the period of performance and when all other revenue recognition criteria has been met. In instances where the performance criteria data is tracked by the third party, we recognize revenue when the amounts earned are either fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Typically, this occurs through our receipt of a cash payment from the third party along with a detailed statement containing the data that is tracked by the third party.
Deferred Revenue—
Deferred revenue includes deferred technology licensing implementation fees and amounts billed for deliverables, including professional services, in multiple element arrangements that do not have stand-alone value from other, undelivered elements, as well as amounts billed or collected from sponsorship or technology licensing customers in advance of our performing our service for such customers. It also includes the amount by which both unbilled and billed services provided under our technology licensing arrangements exceed the straight-line revenue recognized to date. We defer commission amounts that have been paid to us related to transactions where our services are complete, but where we cannot currently estimate future forfeitures related to those amounts.
We allocate revenue to all units of accounting within an arrangement with multiple deliverables at the inception of the arrangement using the relative selling price method. The relative selling price method allocates any discount in an arrangement proportionally to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s relative selling price. The relative selling price established for each deliverable is based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”) if available, third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE is not available, or best estimate of selling price if neither VSOE nor third-party evidence is available. When used, the best estimate of selling price reflects our best estimates of what the selling prices of certain deliverables would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. Our process for determining best estimate of selling price for deliverables without VSOE or third-party evidence of selling price considers multiple factors that may vary depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key factors considered by us in developing the relative selling prices for our technology licensing fees include prices charged by us for similar offerings and our historical pricing practices. We may also consider additional factors as appropriate, including competition.
A deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has stand-alone value and there are no customer-negotiated right of refunds for the delivered elements. If the arrangement includes a customer-negotiated right of refund relative to the delivered item, and the delivery and performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control, the delivered element constitutes a separate unit of accounting. In circumstances when the aforementioned criteria are not met, the deliverable is combined with the undelivered elements, and the allocation of the arrangement consideration and revenue recognition is determined for the combined unit as a single unit. Allocation of the consideration is determined at the inception of the arrangement on the basis of each unit’s relative selling price. After the arrangement consideration has been allocated to each unit of accounting based on their relative selling prices, we apply revenue recognition criteria separately to each respective unit of accounting in the arrangement in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.
Cost of Revenue—
Included in cost of revenue are payments related to health insurance policies sold to members who were referred to our website by marketing partners with whom we have revenue-sharing arrangements. In order to enter into a revenue-sharing arrangement, marketing partners must be licensed to sell health insurance in the state where the policy is sold. Costs related to revenue-sharing arrangements are expensed as the related revenue is recognized.
Additionally, cost of revenue includes the amortization of consideration we paid to a broker partner in connection with the transfer of their Medicare-related health insurance members to us as the new broker of record on the underlying policies.
Marketing and Advertising Expenses—
Marketing and advertising expenses consist primarily of member acquisition expenses associated with our direct, marketing partner and online advertising member acquisition channels, in addition to compensation and other expenses related to marketing, business development, partner management, public relations and carrier relations personnel who support our offerings. Advertising costs incurred in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 totaled
$66.5 million
,
$64.8 million
and
$56.0 million
, respectively.
Our direct channel expenses primarily consist of costs for direct mail, email marketing and television and radio advertising. Advertising costs for our direct channel are expensed the first time the related advertising takes place. Our marketing partner channel expenses primarily consist of fees paid to marketing partners with which we have a relationship. Our
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
online advertising channel expenses primarily consist of paid keyword search advertising on search engines and retargeting campaigns. Advertising costs for our marketing partner channel and our online advertising channel are expensed as incurred.
Research and Development Expenses—
Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses incurred for employees on our engineering and technical teams. Research and development costs, which totaled
$10.6 million
,
$8.9 million
and
$7.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively, are included in technology and content expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss.
Deferred Contract Costs—
Deferred contract costs primarily represent direct costs related to professional services provided in connection with technology licensing arrangements that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting. The direct professional services costs are deferred up until the commencement of revenue recognition of the single unit and then recognized as cost of revenue ratably over the same period as the related revenue.
Internal-Use Software and Website Development Costs—
We capitalize costs of materials, consultants and compensation and benefits costs of employees who devote time to the development of internal-use software during the application development stage. Our judgment is required in determining the point at which various projects enter the phases at which costs may be capitalized, in assessing the ongoing value of the capitalized costs and in determining the estimated useful lives over which the costs are amortized, which is generally three years. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, we capitalized internal-use software and website development costs of
$1.1 million
,
$1.8 million
and
$3.2 million
, respectively, and recorded amortization expense of
$0.6 million
,
$0.9 million
and
$1.5 million
, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation—
We recognize stock-based compensation expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss based on the fair value of our stock-based awards over their respective vesting periods, which is generally four years. The estimated grant date fair value of our stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model and a single option award approach. The weighted-average expected term for stock options granted is calculated using historical option exercise behavior. The dividend yield is determined by dividing the expected per share dividend during the coming year by the grant date stock price. Through December 31, 2017, we had not declared or paid any cash dividends, and we do not expect to pay any in the foreseeable future. We base the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term of our stock options. Expected volatility is determined using a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options in our stock and historical volatility of our stock price. The estimated attainment of performance-based awards and related expense is based on the expectations of revenue and earnings target achievement. The estimated fair value of performance awards with market conditions is determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation model. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards and expected attainment of performance-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. We will continue to use judgment in evaluating the expected term and volatility related to our own stock-based awards on a prospective basis, and incorporating these factors into the model. Changes in key assumptions could significantly impact the valuation of such instruments.
401(k) Plan—
In September 1998, our board of directors adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (401(k) Plan), which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Participation in the 401(k) Plan is available to substantially all employees in the United States. Employees can contribute up to
25%
of their salary, up to the federal maximum allowable limit, on a before-tax basis to the 401(k) Plan. Employee contributions are fully vested when contributed. Our contributions to the 401(k) Plan are discretionary and are expensed when incurred. We also match employee contributions to our 401(k) Plan at 25% of an employee’s contribution each pay period, up to a maximum of
1%
of the employee’s salary during such pay period. Our matching contributions are expensed as incurred and vest one-third for each of the first
three
years of the recipient’s service. The recipient is fully vested in all 401(k) Plan matching contributions after three years of service. We recognized expense of
$0.3 million
,
$0.3 million
and
$0.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively, related to 401(k) matching contributions.
Income Taxes—
We account for income taxes using the liability method. Deferred income taxes are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
We utilize a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Step one,
Recognition
, requires a company to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. Step two,
Measurement
, is based on the largest amount of
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
benefit, which is more likely than not to be realized on ultimate settlement. We record interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality—
A greater number of our Medicare-related health insurance plans are sold in our fourth quarter during the Medicare annual enrollment period when Medicare-eligible individuals are permitted to change their Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage for the following year. Additionally, substantially all of the Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug policies we have sold renew on January 1 of each year, resulting in our recognizing substantially all renewal Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plan commission revenue in our first quarter. Our Medicare plan-related commission revenue is highest in our first quarter and is higher in our fourth quarter compared to our second and third quarters.
The majority of our individual and family health insurance plans are sold in the annual open enrollment period as defined under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. Individuals and families generally are not able to purchase individual and family health insurance outside of these open enrollment periods, unless they qualify for a special enrollment period as a result of certain qualifying events, such as losing employer-sponsored health insurance or moving to another state.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718) —
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-09,
Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting
, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2017-09 is to be applied on a prospective basis to an award modified on or after the adoption date. We will adopt ASU 2017-09 in the first quarter of 2018 and do not expect the adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350) —
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350)
. Under the new standard, goodwill impairment would be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. This ASU eliminates existing guidance that requires an entity to determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by hypothetically assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The new standard is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted for annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The standard must be applied prospectively. Upon adoption, the standard will impact how we assess goodwill for impairment. We do not expect ASU 2017-04 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) —
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash
, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. Under the ASU, changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included along with those of cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities would no longer present transfers between cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In addition, a reconciliation between the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows would be disclosed when the balance sheet includes more than one line item for cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents. ASU 2016-18 will be effective for us beginning on January 1, 2018 and will be applied on a retrospective basis. We do not expect the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
. ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We will adopt ASU 2016-15 in the first quarter of 2018 and we do not expect the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Leases (Topic 842) —
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842).
ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. Recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses will depend on classification as a finance or operating lease; for
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
lessors, the guidance modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct finance leases. The guidance also eliminates existing real estate-specific provisions for all entities. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently considering our timing of adoption and are in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition (Topic 606) —
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, requiring an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,
Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
. ASU 2016-10 provides guidance in identifying performance obligations and determining the appropriate accounting for licensing arrangements. The effective date and transition requirements for this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09).ASU 2014-09 may be adopted retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). We will adopt this new accounting standard for the reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018, using the full retrospective method to restate each prior reporting period presented.
We have completed a review of our business processes, systems and controls as part of our effort to adopt the new revenue recognition standard and are executing on our developed project plan that includes analyzing the standard’s impact on our contract portfolio, comparing our historical policies and practices to the requirements of the new standard and identifying differences from applying the requirements of the new standard to our contracts. We have implemented necessary internal controls to ensure we adequately evaluate our portfolio of contracts under the five-step model promulgated by the FASB to ensure proper assessment of our operating results under the new standard. We do not expect a significant change in our control environment due to the adoption of the new standard; however, we will continue to assess as we finalize the impact of the adoption. We are also reporting on the progress of the implementation to our board of directors and the audit committee of our board of directors on a regular basis during the project’s duration.
The adoption of the new standard will have a material impact to our opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2016 due to the cumulative effect of adopting under the full retrospective method. In addition, our adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on our commission revenue and, as a result, on our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017. Under the new standard, since our services associated with Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plans are complete once an application is approved by a carrier, we will recognize Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plan commission revenue at the time the plan is approved by the carrier equal to the estimated commissions we expect to collect on the plan. The estimated commissions we expect to collect on a plan and that we will recognize as revenue upon approval of the application will vary based on product type and other factors, such as the estimated commission rates and the estimated life of the respective policies. These estimates will change with our actual experience after adoption. We are still in the process of finalizing our estimates by product type. Due to annual services we provide in renewing small business health insurance plans, we expect to recognize small business health insurance plan commission revenue at the time the plan is approved by the carrier, and when it renews each year thereafter, equal to the estimated commissions we expect to collect from the plan over the following 12-months. We have reviewed our contracts with our customers, the carriers whose plans we sell, and determined that we do not incur incremental costs when we enter into new contracts with carriers; therefore, we do not expect to capitalize contract acquisition costs as a result of the adoption of the new standard. Topic 606 will require us to make significant estimates, including, but not limited to, the estimated consideration to be paid to us over the estimated life of plans approved by carriers, or the following 12 months for small business health insurance plans, for which we are the broker of record. In addition, we are in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of the new standard will have on our accounting for income taxes. Our adoption of the new standard will also significantly change the seasonality of our revenues, primarily with respect to our Medicare-related, individual and family and ancillary health insurance plan commission revenue. Under Topic 606, we expect to recognize significantly lower commission revenue in the first quarter of each year when we have historically recognized commission revenue from Medicare-related renewals and expect to instead record significantly greater commission revenue in the fourth quarter of each year as a result of the increase in approved plans we experience during the fourth quarter annual and open enrollment periods.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2 - Balance Sheet Accounts
Cash and Cash Equivalents—
As of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
, our cash equivalents consisted of money market accounts that invested in U.S. government-sponsored enterprise bonds and discount notes, U.S. government treasury bills and notes and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government obligations. As of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
, our cash equivalents carried no unrealized gains or losses and we did not realize any significant gains or losses on sales of cash equivalents during the years ended
December 31,
2016 and 2017.
As of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
, our cash and cash equivalent balances were invested as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Cash
|
$
|
4,066
|
|
|
$
|
5,098
|
|
Money market funds
|
57,715
|
|
|
35,195
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
61,781
|
|
|
$
|
40,293
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk—
Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We invest our cash and cash equivalents with major banks and financial institutions and, at times, such investments are in excess of federally insured limits. We also have deposits with major banks in China that are denominated in both U.S. dollars and Chinese Yuan Renminbi and are not insured by the U.S. federal government.
We do not require collateral or other security for our accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2016,
three
customers represented
23%
,
20%
and
11%
, respectively, for a combined total of
54%
of our
$9.2 million
outstanding accounts receivable balance. As of
December 31, 2017
,
two
customers represented
23%
and
22%
, respectively, or a combined total of
45%
, of our
$9.9 million
outstanding accounts receivable balance. No other customers represented 10% or more of our total accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. We believe the potential for collection issues with any of our customers was minimal as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, our estimate for uncollectible amounts at December 31, 2017 was not material.
Accounts Receivable—
As of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
, our accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Commissions receivable
|
$
|
7,265
|
|
|
$
|
8,419
|
|
Accounts receivable – other revenue
|
1,948
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
$
|
9,213
|
|
|
$
|
9,894
|
|
The commissions receivable balance as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, primarily relates to Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D plans sold during the fourth quarter of 2016 and 2017 with effective dates in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Commissions receivable were recorded net of forfeiture reserves totaling
$1.1 million
,
$1.6 million
and
$1.5 million
as of December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. To date, our estimates have not materially differed from actual results.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Prepaid Expenses and Other
Current
Assets-
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Prepaid maintenance contracts
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
Book-of-business transfers, net
|
1,071
|
|
|
539
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
541
|
|
|
490
|
|
Prepaid rent
|
370
|
|
|
311
|
|
Other current assets
|
1,140
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
$
|
5,148
|
|
|
$
|
4,845
|
|
Property and Equipment-
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Computer equipment and software
|
$
|
17,524
|
|
|
$
|
17,112
|
|
Office equipment and furniture
|
3,490
|
|
|
3,583
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
3,173
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
Property and equipment, gross
|
24,187
|
|
|
23,851
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(18,579
|
)
|
|
(19,146
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
5,608
|
|
|
$
|
4,705
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment totaled
$4.1 million
,
$3.5 million
and
$2.8 million
in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
Other Assets-
Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Capitalized project costs
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
4,481
|
|
Security deposits
|
589
|
|
|
545
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
204
|
|
|
232
|
|
Book-of-business transfers, net
|
665
|
|
|
30
|
|
Other assets
|
280
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
Other assets
|
$
|
4,473
|
|
|
$
|
7,317
|
|
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Intangible Assets-
The carrying amounts, accumulated amortization, net carrying value and weighted average remaining life of our definite-lived amortizable intangible assets, as well as our indefinite-lived intangible trademarks, are presented in the tables below for (dollars in thousands, weighted-average useful life is as of December 31, 2017):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Life
|
Technology
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
0 years
|
Pharmacy and customer relationships
|
10,100
|
|
|
(6,934
|
)
|
|
3,166
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
(7,884
|
)
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
2.3 years
|
Trade names, trademarks and website addresses
|
907
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
300
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
210
|
|
|
2.3 years
|
Total intangible assets subject to amortization
|
$
|
12,707
|
|
|
$
|
(9,241
|
)
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
$
|
12,707
|
|
|
$
|
(10,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived trademarks and domain names
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,540
|
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled
$1.2 million
,
$1.0 million
and
$1.0 million
, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, expected amortization expense in future periods is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
Pharmacy and Customer Relationships
|
|
Trade Names, Trademarks and Website Addresses
|
|
Total
|
2018
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
2019
|
950
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
2020
|
316
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
346
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
2,426
|
|
Other Current Liabilities-
Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Payable to carriers – estimate for forfeitures
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,807
|
|
Professional fees
|
307
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
438
|
|
|
611
|
|
Total other current liabilities
|
$
|
3,775
|
|
|
$
|
3,430
|
|
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Non-current Liabilities-
Non-current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Deferred rent – non-current
|
$
|
830
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
Income tax payable – non-current
|
1,978
|
|
|
19
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
443
|
|
|
71
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
123
|
|
|
86
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
$
|
3,374
|
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
Note 3 - Fair Value Measurements
We define fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques we use to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We classify the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
|
Level 2
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or
|
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
|
Our cash equivalents were invested in money market funds and were classified as Level 1. We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. We used observable prices in active markets in determining the classification of our money market funds as Level 1.
The following table is a summary of financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and their classification within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Total
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Total
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
57,715
|
|
|
$
|
57,715
|
|
|
$
|
57,715
|
|
|
$
|
35,195
|
|
|
$
|
35,195
|
|
|
$
|
35,195
|
|
Note 4 - Stockholder's Equity
Preferred Stock
-Our board of directors has the authority, without any further action by our stockholders, to issue up to
110,000,000
shares, par value
$0.001
per share, of which
10,000,000
shares are designated as preferred stock. As of December 31, 2016 and 2017, there were
no
shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock
-On all matters submitted to our stockholders for vote, our common stockholders are entitled to one vote per share, voting together as a single class, and do not have cumulative voting rights. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors can elect all of the directors standing for election, if they so choose. Subject to preferences that may apply to any shares of preferred stock outstanding, the holders of common stock are entitled to share equally in any dividends, when and if declared by our board of directors. Upon the occurrence of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share equally in all assets remaining after the payment of any liabilities and the liquidation preferences on any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking funds provisions applicable to the common stock.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Shares Reserved
-We generally issue previously unissued common stock upon the exercise of stock options, the vesting of restricted stock units and upon granting of restricted common stock awards; however we may reissue previously acquired treasury shares to satisfy these future issuances. Shares of authorized but unissued common stock reserved for future issuance were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
Stock options issued and outstanding
|
983
|
|
Restricted stock units issued and outstanding
|
1,745
|
|
Shares available for grant
|
1,409
|
|
Total shares reserved
|
4,137
|
|
Stock
Plans-
On June 12, 2014, upon approval at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we adopted the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan replaced the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and
4,500,000
shares were authorized for issuance under the 2014 Plan. The 2014 Plan does not include an evergreen provision to automatically increase the number of shares available under it and increases in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2014 Plan require stockholder approval. Also, under the 2014 Plan the following shares are not recycled for future grant under the 2014 Plan: (i) shares used in connection with the exercise of an option and/or stock appreciation right to pay the exercise price or purchase price of such award or satisfy applicable tax withholding obligations; and (ii) the gross number of shares subject to stock appreciation rights that are exercised. Furthermore, the 2014 Plan included a provision that prohibits repricing of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights and formalized and updated procedures to qualify awards as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in order to preserve full tax deductibility of such awards.
We previously granted options to purchase shares of our common stock and restricted stock units under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and 2005 Stock Plan. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan was terminated with respect to the grant of additional awards on June 12, 2014, upon adoption of our 2014 Plan. The 2005 Stock Plan was terminated with respect to the grant of additional awards upon the effectiveness of the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
Our stock options granted under the 2014 Plan generally vest over
four
years at a rate of
25%
after
one
year and
1/48th
per month thereafter. Stock options granted under the 2014 Plan generally expire after
seven years
from the date of grant. On December 31, 2017,
no
shares were subject to repurchase.
Our restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2014 Plan, 2006 Plan and 2005 Stock Plan generally vest over
four
years at a rate of
25%
after
one
year and
25%
annually thereafter.
We grant market-based restricted stock units to our executive officers and certain members of our senior management team. Each market-based stock unit represents a contingent right to receive certain shares of our common stock upon the attainment of certain stock prices over a four-year performance period. Once a stock price threshold is achieved, the portion of the award related to that threshold will vest on the one-year anniversary of the date of achievement, subject to the employee's continued service through each vesting date. Compensation expense related to these awards is recognized on an accelerated basis over the requisite service period.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes activity under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) for the year ended
December 31,
2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Available for Grant
1
|
Shares available for grant December 31, 2016
1
|
2,267
|
|
Restricted stock units granted
2
|
(860
|
)
|
Options granted
3
|
(330
|
)
|
Restricted stock units cancelled
4
|
318
|
|
Options cancelled
|
14
|
|
Shares available for grant December 31, 2017
1
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Shares available for grant do not include treasury stock shares that could be granted if we determined to do so.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes grants of restricted stock units with service, performance-based or market-based vesting criteria.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes grants of stock options with service, performance-based or market-based vesting criteria.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes cancelled restricted stock units with service, performance-based or market-based vesting criteria.
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Stock Plans (in thousands, except weighted-average exercise price and weighted-average remaining contractual life data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Stock Options
1
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
2
|
Balance outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
975
|
|
|
$
|
18.14
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
Granted
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
16.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
(253
|
)
|
|
$
|
20.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
983
|
|
|
$
|
17.38
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
$
|
2,522
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017
|
931
|
|
|
$
|
17.44
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
$
|
2,401
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2017
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
20.34
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
$
|
857
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes certain stock options with service, performance-based or market-based vesting criteria.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the product between eHealth’s closing stock price as of December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2017
and the exercise price of in-the-money options as of those dates.
|
The following table provides information pertaining to our stock options for the year ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands, except weighted-average fair values):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
|
$
|
9.03
|
|
Total fair value of options vested
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,243
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity under the Stock Plans (in thousands, except weighted-average grant date fair value and weighted-average remaining contractual life data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Restricted Stock Units
1
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Service Period
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
2
|
Unvested as of December 31, 2016
|
1,523
|
|
|
$
|
12.83
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
$
|
13,901
|
|
Granted
|
860
|
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
(318
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
(320
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested as of December 31, 2017
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
$
|
30,313
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes certain restricted stock units with service, performance-based or market-based vesting criteria.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference of our closing stock price as of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
multiplied by the number of restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2017
, respectively.
|
Stock Repurchase Programs —
We had no stock repurchase activity during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. In addition to
10,663,888
shares repurchased under our past repurchase programs as of
December 31, 2017
, we have in treasury
574,107
shares that were previously surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholdings due in connection with the vesting of certain restricted stock units. As of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
, we had a total of
11,135,590
shares and
11,237,995
shares, respectively, held in treasury.
For accounting purposes, common stock repurchased under our stock repurchase programs is recorded based upon the settlement date of the applicable trade. Such repurchased shares are held in treasury and are presented using the cost method.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense —
The fair value of stock options granted to employees for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was estimated using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Expected term
|
4.3
|
|
4.4
|
|
4.3
|
Expected volatility
|
64.1%
|
|
65.4%
|
|
69.8%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
—%
|
|
—%
|
|
—%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.2%
|
|
1.1%
|
|
1.8%
|
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The weighted-average fair value of the market-based options and restricted stock units was determined using the Monte Carlo simulation model using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Expected term
|
2.6
|
|
2.1
|
|
1.6
|
Expected volatility
|
64.7%
|
|
67.9%
|
|
70.9%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
—%
|
|
—%
|
|
—%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.1%
|
|
1.1%
|
|
1.7%
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
$6.69
|
|
$9.64
|
|
$9.42
|
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recorded during the years ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Common stock options
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
$
|
1,863
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
5,480
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
7,831
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
7,002
|
|
|
$
|
7,266
|
|
|
$
|
9,694
|
|
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense by operating function for the years ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Marketing and advertising
|
$
|
1,950
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
Customer care and enrollment
|
477
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
418
|
|
Technology and content
|
1,728
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
General and administrative
|
2,734
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
113
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
7,002
|
|
|
$
|
7,266
|
|
|
$
|
9,694
|
|
As of December 31, 2017, there was
$3.4 million
of total unamortized compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, and these costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.6
years. As of December 31, 2017, there was
$17.8 million
of total unamortized compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock units, and these costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.7
years.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, due to changes in our senior management, we accelerated the vesting dates of certain stock options and restricted stock units granted to three former employees. We recorded a
$0.5 million
incremental stock-based compensation expense in connection with this modification.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5 - Income Taxes
The components of our loss before benefit for income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
United States
|
$
|
(6,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,638
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,139
|
)
|
Foreign
|
435
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
972
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes
|
$
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,167
|
)
|
The benefit for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
(584
|
)
|
|
$
|
(948
|
)
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
State
|
(457
|
)
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
Foreign
|
97
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
179
|
|
Total current
|
(944
|
)
|
|
(984
|
)
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
121
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
(2,169
|
)
|
State
|
10
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Foreign
|
(30
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Total deferred
|
101
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
(2,226
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
$
|
(843
|
)
|
|
$
|
(871
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,755
|
)
|
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the “Jobs Act”, was signed into law resulting in significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Jobs Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, changes U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and imposes a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. The Jobs Act also includes provisions for the elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT"), among other changes. We calculated our best estimate of the impact of the Jobs Act in our year end income tax provision in accordance with our understanding of the Jobs Act and guidance available as of the filing date of this annual report on Form 10-K and recorded
$2.3 million
as additional income tax benefit in 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. Of the
$2.3 million
, we recorded a provisional benefit amount of
$1.8 million
related to the reversal of AMT credits which are now refundable credits under the provisions of the Jobs Act. We have also remeasured the deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rate at which they are expected to reverse in the future and recorded a
$0.5 million
benefit as a result of this remeasurement. The effects of other provisions of the Jobs Act are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, however, the final impact of the Jobs Act may differ from our estimates, due to, among other things, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, additional guidance that may be issued, and resulting actions we may take.
.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table provides a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Tax provision (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
1.1
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
9.2
|
|
Non-qualified stock option windfalls (shortfalls), net
|
(31.6
|
)
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
0.5
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Lobbying
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Research and development credits
|
20.1
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Changes in valuation allowance
|
21.8
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Tax reform - tax rate change
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
Foreign income tax and income inclusion
|
—
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
0.8
|
|
Other
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
0.2
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Our effective tax rate in 2015 and 2016 differ from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the reversal of previously recorded reserves related to federal and state tax credits. Our effective tax rate in 2017 differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to reversal of previously recorded reserves related to federal and state tax credits, reversal of the valuation allowance related to AMT credits and tax rate change resulting from tax reform legislation passed in 2017.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, together with net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Significant components of our deferred tax assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
$
|
2,242
|
|
|
$
|
2,499
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
2,960
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
Intangible assets
|
1,464
|
|
|
448
|
|
Net operating losses
|
9,337
|
|
|
12,055
|
|
Tax credits
|
4,399
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
Other
|
70
|
|
|
178
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
20,472
|
|
|
21,192
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
(19,430
|
)
|
|
(20,426
|
)
|
Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
|
1,042
|
|
|
766
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities – intangible assets
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
(551
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities – fixed assets
|
—
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
Assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets is dependent upon several factors, including the likelihood and amount, if any, of future taxable income in relevant jurisdictions during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We forecast taxable income by considering all available positive and negative evidence, including our history of operating income and losses and our financial plans and estimates that we use to manage the business. These assumptions require significant judgment about future taxable income. As a result, the amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income change. As of December 31, 2017, the valuation allowance was
$20.4 million
, which represents a full valuation allowance against our federal and state deferred tax
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
assets. The valuation allowance was recorded as a result of increased uncertainty regarding our future taxable income and a lack of sources of other taxable income.
The valuation allowance increased by
$8.9 million
during the year ended December 31, 2016 and increased by
$1.0 million
during the year ended December 31, 2017.
We had net operating loss carry forwards at December 31, 2017 of approximately
$39.7 million
and
$60.0 million
for federal income tax and state income tax purposes, respectively. Federal and state net operating loss carry forwards begin expiring in 2034 and 2020, respectively. At December 31, 2017, we had tax credit carry forwards of approximately
$3.0 million
and
$4.2 million
for federal income tax and state income tax purposes, respectively. The Federal tax credit carry forwards begin expiring in 2021. The state tax credits carry forward indefinitely.
Utilization of the net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and credits may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership changes that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code"), and similar state provisions. These ownership change limitations may limit the amount of NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382 of the Code results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points (by value) of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders. Our ability to use the remaining NOL carryforwards may be further limited if we experience a Section 382 ownership change as a result of future changes in our stock ownership.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of our unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
$
|
6,756
|
|
Increases based on tax positions related to the prior year
|
344
|
|
Decreases based on tax positions related to the prior year
|
(24
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
(1,301
|
)
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
409
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
$
|
6,184
|
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
(1,236
|
)
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
305
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
5,253
|
|
Decreases based on tax positions related to the prior year
|
(862
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
(1,637
|
)
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
342
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
3,096
|
|
Tax positions are evaluated in a two-step process. We first determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. If a tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, it is then measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
As of December 31, 2017, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was
$3.1 million
, of which a nominal amount, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2016, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was
$5.3 million
, of which
$1.6 million
, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate.
We record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. At December 31, 2017, we had only a nominal amount accrued for estimated interest related to uncertain tax positions. We did not record an accrual for penalties.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Included in the balance of income tax liabilities, accrued interest, and accrued penalties at December 31, 2017 is a nominal amount related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the statute of limitations will expire in various jurisdictions and income tax exams will close within the next twelve months.
We are subject to taxation in various jurisdictions, including federal, state and foreign. Our federal and state income tax returns are generally not subject to examination by taxing authorities for fiscal years before 2007 due to our net operating losses. The examination of our 2009 and 2010 California income tax returns by the California Franchise Tax Board was completed in the first quarter of 2017. We assessed the impact on our unrecognized tax benefits for all open years and recorded any necessary adjustments in the first quarter of 2017.
Note 6 - Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock equivalent shares, including options and restricted stock units. The dilutive effect of outstanding awards is reflected in diluted net loss per share by application of the treasury stock method.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net weighted-average number of common stock shares outstanding
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
Net loss per share—basic:
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(4,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
Dilutive effect of common stock
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total common stock shares used in per share calculation
|
18,008
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
18,512
|
|
Net loss per share—diluted
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
For each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, we had securities outstanding that could potentially dilute earnings per share, but the shares from the assumed conversion or exercise of these securities were excluded in the computation of diluted net loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. The number of outstanding anti-dilutive shares that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Common stock options
|
1,484
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
908
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
866
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Total
|
2,350
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
Note 7 - Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
On January 26, 2017, a purported class action lawsuit was filed against us in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. The complaint alleges that we negligently failed to take necessary precautions required to protect from unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information contained on 2016 Form W-2s for current and former employees. The complaint purports to allege causes of action against us for negligence, violation of Section 17200 et seq. of the California Business & Professions Code, declaratory relief and breach of implied contract. The complaint seeks actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages, costs, including experts’ fees and attorneys’ fees, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as prescribed by law and equitable, injunctive and declaratory relief as appropriate. In April 2017, an additional purported class action lawsuit was filed against us in the Superior Court of State of California, County of Santa Clara, relating to the same circumstances. The second complaint purports to allege causes of action against us for negligence, violation of California Customer Records Act (California Civil Code Section 1798.80 et seq.), violation of the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (California Civil Code Section 56 et seq.), invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts, breach of confidentiality and violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 et seq.). The causes of action for violations of the California Customer Records Act and the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act were dismissed without prejudice. The second complaint seeks actual damages, statutory damages, restitution, disgorgement, equitable, injunctive and declaratory relief, costs, including experts’ fees
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and attorneys’ fees and costs of prosecuting the action, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as prescribed by law. In July 2017, we entered into a binding settlement term sheet where we and the plaintiffs in each of the above-described cases agreed to enter into a settlement, pursuant to which we would receive a release of all claims that were or could have been alleged related to the unauthorized disclosure at issue in each of the cases. In exchange for the release, we agreed to (i) pay, subject to an aggregate cap of $250,000, up to $2,500 to each impacted individual for reasonable, documented out-of-pocket losses or expenses related to the data security incident; (ii) offer to individuals who signed up for identity theft protection that we offered at the time of the incident a one-year extension of the identity theft protection; (iii) offer to individuals who did not sign up for identity theft protection that we offered at the time of the incident three-years of identity theft protection; and (iv) not oppose a request by class counsel for attorneys’ fees, costs and class representative enhancements of up to $245,000 in the aggregate. In December 2017, the Company entered into a joint stipulation for settlement of class action consistent with the settlement term sheet. The terms of the settlement are subject to a hearing and court approval. As of December 31, 2017, we recorded an accrual for estimated potential damages in our consolidated financial statements.
Operating Lease Obligations
We lease our operating facilities and certain of our equipment and furniture and fixtures under various operating leases, the latest of which expires in July 2023. Certain of these leases have free or escalating rent payment provisions. We recognize rent expense on our operating leases on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, although actual cash payment obligations under certain of these agreements fluctuate over the terms of the agreements.
In March 2012, we entered into an agreement to lease a building in Mountain View, California, adjacent to our headquarters office. The term of the operating lease is
ten
years from the date the building was delivered to us in August 2013. The base rent increases annually by
3%
. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments related to this operating lease totaled
$4.2 million
over the remaining term of the lease plus our proportionate share of certain operating expenses, insurance costs and taxes for each calendar year during the lease.
In April 2013, we entered into an agreement to lease approximately
20,000
square feet of office space in Westford, Massachusetts. The lease commenced in July 2013 and is for a term of 5 years and 3 months. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments totaled approximately
$0.4 million
over the remaining term of the lease.
In August 2014, we renewed our agreement to lease and expanded to approximately
50,000
square feet of office space in Gold River, California. The lease commenced in August 2014 and is for a term of 4 years and 5 months. In 2015, we vacated approximately
11,200
square feet of this leased office space as a result of a workforce reduction. We reoccupied approximately
5,400
square feet of this previously vacated office space in 2016. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments totaled approximately
$3.4 million
over the remaining term of the lease.
In August 2017, we entered into an agreement to amend our lease on approximately
28,000
square feet of office space in South Jordan, Utah. This amendment extends the term of this facility lease by
five years, three months
, from January 2018 to March 2023. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum lease payments under this lease amendment totaled approximately
$3.4 million
over the remaining term of the lease.
Total rent expense under all operating leases was approximately
$5.4 million
,
$4.5 million
and
$4.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
Service and Licensing Obligations
We have entered into service and licensing agreements with third party vendors to provide various services, including network access, equipment maintenance and software licensing. The terms of these services and licensing agreements are generally up to three years. As the benefits of these agreements are experienced uniformly over the applicable contractual periods, we record the related service and licensing expenses on a straight-line basis, although actual cash payment obligations under certain of these agreements fluctuate over the terms of the agreements.
The following table presents a summary of our future minimum payments under non-cancellable operating lease agreements and contractual service and licensing obligations as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
Service and Licensing Obligations
|
|
Total Obligations
|
2018
|
$
|
3,617
|
|
|
$
|
1,998
|
|
|
$
|
5,615
|
|
2019
|
2,996
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
2020
|
2,994
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
3,324
|
|
2021
|
1,457
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
2022
|
1,501
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
Thereafter
|
651
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
651
|
|
Total
|
$
|
13,216
|
|
|
$
|
3,189
|
|
|
$
|
16,405
|
|
Note 8 - Operating Segments, Geographic Information and Significant Customers
Operating Segments
The following table presents summary results of our operating segments for the year ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare
|
$
|
63,163
|
|
|
$
|
80,269
|
|
|
$
|
102,584
|
|
Individual, Family and Small Business
|
126,378
|
|
|
106,691
|
|
|
69,771
|
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
189,541
|
|
|
$
|
186,960
|
|
|
$
|
172,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare segment loss
|
$
|
(23,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,141
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,760
|
)
|
Individual, Family and Small Business segment profit
|
59,499
|
|
|
67,905
|
|
|
30,427
|
|
Total segment profit
|
36,215
|
|
|
34,764
|
|
|
11,667
|
|
Corporate
|
(25,135
|
)
|
|
(29,071
|
)
|
|
(27,590
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
(6,889
|
)
|
|
(7,266
|
)
|
|
(9,694
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
(3,539
|
)
|
|
(2,837
|
)
|
Restructuring (charge) benefit
|
(4,541
|
)
|
|
297
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
45
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
Loss before benefit for income taxes
|
$
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,167
|
)
|
There are no internal revenue transactions between our operating segments. Our CODM does not separately evaluate assets by segment, and therefore assets by segment are not presented.
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Geographic Information
Our long-lived assets consisted primarily of property and equipment, internally-developed software, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets and finite-lived intangible assets. Our long-lived assets are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located. Long-lived assets by geographical area as of
December 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2017
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
United States
|
$
|
32,162
|
|
|
$
|
32,876
|
|
China
|
391
|
|
|
550
|
|
Total
|
$
|
32,553
|
|
|
$
|
33,426
|
|
Significant Customers
Substantially all revenue for the years ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017 was generated from customers located in the United States. Carriers representing 10% or more of our total revenue for the years ended
December 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017 are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
Humana
|
23
|
%
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
22
|
%
|
UnitedHealthcare
1
|
11
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
Aetna
2
|
10
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
UnitedHealthcare also includes other carriers owned by UnitedHealthcare.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aetna includes other carriers owned by Aetna.
|
Note 9 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Selected summarized quarterly financial information for 2016 and 2017 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
Revenue
|
$
|
78,939
|
|
|
$
|
27,957
|
|
|
$
|
26,619
|
|
|
$
|
38,840
|
|
|
$
|
172,355
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
31,822
|
|
|
(17,225
|
)
|
|
(20,705
|
)
|
|
(23,386
|
)
|
|
(29,494
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
33,421
|
|
|
(17,260
|
)
|
|
(20,616
|
)
|
|
(20,958
|
)
|
|
(25,412
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
Revenue
|
$
|
73,844
|
|
|
$
|
37,277
|
|
|
$
|
32,079
|
|
|
$
|
43,760
|
|
|
$
|
186,960
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
23,683
|
|
|
(5,809
|
)
|
|
(6,916
|
)
|
|
(16,813
|
)
|
|
(5,855
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
18,034
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
(5,736
|
)
|
|
(16,704
|
)
|
|
(4,882
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
EHEALTH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 – Subsequent Events
GoMedigap Acquisition
On January 22, 2018, we completed our acquisition of all outstanding membership interests of Wealth, Health and Life Advisors, LLC, more commonly known as GoMedigap, a technology-enabled provider of Medicare Supplement enrollment services. The acquisition price primarily consisted of cash of
$15.0 million
, less
$0.1 million
cash acquired, and approximately
294,637
shares of our common stock. In addition, we are obligated to pay an additional
$20 million
in cash and
589,275
shares of our common stock, subject to the terms of the acquisition agreement and upon final determination of the achievement of certain milestones in 2018 and 2019.
Restructuring Activities
On February 25, 2018, our Board of Directors approved a plan to close our sales call center in Massachusetts and to terminate the employment of other employees in other locations. As part of this plan, we expect to eliminate approximately
110
full-time positions, representing approximately
10%
of our workforce, primarily within customer care and enrollment. We expect to incur approximately
$2.0 million
to
$2.4 million
for employee termination benefits and related costs as well as approximately
$0.3 million
to
$0.5 million
in contract termination and other restructuring charges. Substantially all of the restructuring charges are expected to result in cash expenditures. These restructuring charges are expected to be recorded in the first half of 2018, when the activities comprising the plan are expected to be substantially completed.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Based on management’s evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on the guidelines established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Based on the results of our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with our Audit Committee.
Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, which is presented below.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, believes that our disclosure controls and our internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of eHealth, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited eHealth, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, eHealth, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and our report dated
March 16, 2018
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
Redwood City, California
|
March 16, 2018
|
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.