Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.

  See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Description of Business

Viacom is home to premier global media brands that create compelling television programs, motion pictures, short-form content, apps, games, consumer products, social media experiences and other entertainment content for audiences in 180 countries. Viacom operates through two reporting segments: Media Networks , which includes the Music & Entertainment Group, the Kids & Family Group and BET Networks, and Filmed Entertainment . The Media Networks segment provides entertainment content and related branded products for consumers in targeted demographics attractive to advertisers, content distributors and retailers. The Filmed Entertainment segment produces, finances, acquires and distributes motion pictures, television programming and other entertainment content under the Paramount Pictures, Paramount Vantage, Paramount Classics, Paramount Animation, Insurge Pictures, Nickelodeon Movies, MTV Films and Paramount Television brands. References in this document to “Viacom,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean Viacom Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016 (“fiscal 2016 ”) or any future period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015 , as filed with the SEC on November 12, 2015 (the “ 2015 Form 10-K”).

Use of Estimates

Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates presented and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include estimates of film ultimate revenues, product returns, potential outcome of uncertain tax positions, fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, fair value of equity-based compensation and pension benefit assumptions. Estimates are based on past experience and other considerations reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2016 presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In connection with its financial instruments project, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments in June 2016 and ASU 2016-01 - Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities in January 2016.

We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standards.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 - Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements, such as requiring all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled and allowing a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. In addition, all related cash flows resulting from share-based payments will be reported as operating activities on the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for the first interim period of our 2018 fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. The new standard will impact our financial statements by increasing or decreasing our income tax provision and increasing cash flow from operating activities.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 - Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for most leases. For income statement purposes, leases will be classified as either operating or finance, generally resulting in straight-line expense recognition for operating leases (similar to current operating leases) and accelerated expense recognition for financing leases (similar to current capital leases). The guidance will be effective for the first interim period of our 2020 fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 - Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that all deferred taxes be classified as noncurrent in the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted on either a prospective or retrospective basis. In the quarter ended December 31, 2015, we adopted the new guidance on a retrospective basis. As a result, our $99 million net deferred tax liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2015 is presented as a deferred tax asset of $51 million within Other assets and $150 million in Deferred tax liabilities, net.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers, a comprehensive revenue recognition model that supersedes the current revenue recognition requirements and most industry-specific guidance. Subsequent accounting standard updates have also been issued which amend and/or clarify the application of ASU 2014-09. The guidance provides a five step framework to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance will be effective for the first interim period of our 2019 fiscal year (with early adoption permitted beginning fiscal year 2018), and allows adoption either under a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

VIACOM INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(continued)

NOTE 3. DEBT

Our total debt consists of the following:

In the third quarter, we repaid the $368 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.250% Senior Notes due April 2016.

The total unamortized discount and issuance fees and expenses related to our senior notes and debentures was $464 million as of June 30, 2016 and $478 million as of September 30, 2015 . The fair value of our senior notes and debentures was approximately $12.3 billion as of June 30, 2016 . The valuation of our publicly traded debt is based on quoted prices in active markets.

Credit Facility

At June 30, 2016 , there were no amounts outstanding under our $2.5 billion revolving credit facility due November 2019. The credit facility is used for general corporate purposes and to support commercial paper outstanding. The amount of unused capacity under the credit facility, after deducting commercial paper outstanding of $453 million with a weighted average maturity of 29 days and weighted average interest rate of 1.24% , was $2.05 billion as of June 30, 2016 . The credit facility has one principal financial covenant that requires our interest coverage for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters to be at least 3.0x, which we met as of June 30, 2016 .

VIACOM INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(continued)

NOTE 4. PENSION BENEFITS

The components of net periodic benefit cost for our defined benefit pension plans, which are currently frozen to future benefit accruals, are set forth below.

NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

As more fully described in Note 11 of the 2015 Form 10-K, our commitments primarily consist of programming and talent commitments, operating and capital lease arrangements, and purchase obligations for goods and services. These arrangements result from our normal course of business and represent obligations that may be payable over several years.

Contingencies

We have certain indemnification obligations with respect to leases primarily associated with the previously discontinued operations of Famous Players Inc. (“Famous Players”). In addition, we have certain indemnities provided by the acquirer of Famous Players. These lease commitments amounted to approximately $242 million as of June 30, 2016 . The amount of lease commitments varies over time depending on expiration or termination of individual underlying leases, or of the related indemnification obligation, and foreign exchange rates, among other things. We may also have exposure for certain other expenses related to the leases, such as property taxes and common area maintenance. We have recorded a liability of $192 million with respect to such obligations as of June 30, 2016 . We believe our accrual is sufficient to meet any future obligations based on our consideration of available financial information, the lessees’ historical performance in meeting their lease obligations and the underlying economic factors impacting the lessees’ business models.

Legal Matters

Various Litigations Involving National Amusements, Inc. and the Sumner M. Redstone National Amusements Trust

National Amusements, Inc. (“National Amusements”), directly and indirectly, is the controlling stockholder of Viacom. National Amusements owns shares in Viacom representing approximately 79.8% of the voting interest in Viacom and approximately 10% of Viacom’s combined common stock. National Amusements is controlled by Sumner M. Redstone, our Chairman Emeritus, who is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of National Amusements, through the Sumner M. Redstone National Amusements Trust (the “SMR Trust”), which owns shares in National Amusements representing 80% of the

voting interest of National Amusements. The shares representing the other 20% of the voting interest of National Amusements are held through a trust controlled by Shari E. Redstone, who is Mr. Redstone’s daughter and the non-executive Vice Chair of Viacom and the President and a member of the Board of Directors of National Amusements. The shares of National Amusements held by the SMR Trust are voted solely by Mr. Redstone until such time as his incapacity or death. Upon Mr. Redstone’s incapacity or death, (1) Ms. Redstone will also become a trustee of the SMR Trust and (2) the shares of National Amusements held by the SMR Trust will be voted by the trustees of the SMR Trust.

Prior to May 20, 2016, the trustees of the SMR Trust were Mr. Dauman and George Abrams, a member of the Board of Directors, as well as Mr. Redstone, Phyllis Redstone, David R. Andelman, Norman Jacobs, and Leonard Lewin. The Board of Directors of National Amusements consisted of Mr. Redstone, Shari Redstone, Mr. Abrams, Mr. Andelman, Mr. Dauman, and Tyler Korff, Ms. Redstone’s son and Mr. Redstone’s grandson. On May 20, 2016, Messrs. Dauman and Abrams received notices stating that they had been removed as Trustees of the SMR Trust and as directors and managers of National Amusements and its subsidiaries and replaced, as to the SMR Trust, by Thaddeus Jankowski, the general counsel of National Amusements, and Jill Krutick; and as to National Amusements, by Ms. Krutick and Kimberlee Korff Ostheimer, Ms. Redstone’s daughter and Mr. Redstone’s granddaughter (the May 20, 2016 removals collectively, the “Purported Removals”).

On May 23, 2016, Messrs. Dauman and Abrams filed a lawsuit (the “Massachusetts Action”) in the Probate and Family Court in Norfolk County, Massachusetts, in which they challenged the Purported Removals on the grounds that such removals were the result of Mr. Redstone’s incapacity and/or the product of undue influence or other improper conduct by Ms. Redstone or others. After commencing the Massachusetts Action, Messrs. Dauman and Abrams moved the court for expedited discovery and trial, as well as an evaluation of Mr. Redstone’s mental competency, and the defendants moved to dismiss the action. On July 28, 2016, the Massachusetts court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and ordered defendants to produce certain medical records of Mr. Redstone. The case will now proceed to the discovery phase and the Massachusetts court noted that it would schedule a trial on the merits in October 2016.

Also on May 23, 2016, attorneys for Mr. Redstone filed a petition in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County (the “California Action”), seeking that court’s confirmation that the Purported Removals were valid.

On June 6, 2016, National Amusements and NAI Entertainment Holdings LLC (together, “NAI”) delivered to Viacom stockholder written consents purporting to amend certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), (i) requiring that any sale or financial transaction affecting all or a portion of Paramount Pictures Corporation (“Paramount”) and various other Viacom subsidiaries that are utilized in the conduct of business of Paramount must be unanimously approved by all of the members of the Board of Directors then in office, (ii) specifying that the Board of Directors can amend the Bylaws only by an affirmative vote of all members of the Board of Directors then in office, and (iii) modifying, in certain respects, Viacom’s existing Bylaws provision requiring that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Chancery Court”) is the exclusive jurisdiction for certain types of corporate litigation.

On June 13, 2016, Viacom entered into a costs and expenses agreement with each of Mr. Dauman and Mr. Abrams (together, the “Agreements”), each of which was approved in advance by a committee comprised of independent members of the Board of Directors. Under the Agreements, Viacom will pay or promptly reimburse Mr. Dauman’s and Mr. Abrams’ costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees and fees of public relations and other consultants) actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the Massachusetts Action and the California Action. Under the Agreements, each of Messrs. Dauman and Abrams is required to repay to Viacom (1) all amounts received from Viacom to the extent it is finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that, in instituting the Massachusetts Action, he acted in breach of his fiduciary or other duties to Viacom or that he has not acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interest of Viacom and (2) any amounts received after taking reasonable steps, as required under the Agreements, to seek recoupment or other economic recovery of costs and expenses related to the subject matter of the Massachusetts Action and the California Action from the SMR Trust and National Amusements and its subsidiaries as authorized under the respective governing documents of, and agreements with, those entities.

On June 16, 2016, NAI delivered to Viacom stockholder written consents purporting to amend additional provisions of the Bylaws to provide that any and all vacancies on the Board of Directors occurring as a result of stockholder action to remove directors or to increase the number of authorized directors shall be filled only by the affirmative vote of stockholders representing at least a majority of stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, except that in the case of a vacancy for any other reason, a majority of the Board of Directors then in office, though less than a quorum, or a sole remaining director shall fill such vacancy if not filled by stockholder action within 30 days of the occurrence of such other vacancy. The June 16th written consents also claimed to remove from the Board of Directors, without cause, Mr. Abrams, Mr. Dauman, Blythe J. McGarvie, Frederic V. Salerno and William Schwartz and to fill the resulting vacancies with Kenneth Lerer, Thomas J. May, Judith McHale, Ronald Nelson and Nicole Seligman (the “Purported Director Replacements”).

On June 16, 2016, NAI filed a lawsuit (the “NAI Delaware Action”) in the Delaware Chancery Court pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 225, (1) seeking the court’s confirmation of the validity and effectiveness of the stockholder written consents delivered by NAI to Viacom on June 6th and June 16th and (2) requesting that, pending a final court ruling, the court maintain the existing Board of Directors and prohibit the Board of Directors from taking any action not in the ordinary course of business. Also on June 16, 2016, Mr. Salerno, Viacom’s lead independent director, filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Chancery Court pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 225 (the “Salerno Delaware Action” and, together with the NAI Delaware Action, the “Delaware Actions”), with the support of the independent directors of the Board of Directors, seeking an expedited determination (1) that the Purported Director Replacements are invalid, (2) that the Board of Directors remains as currently comprised, (3) enjoining NAI from taking further wrongful actions under the authority of Mr. Redstone and (4) entering a status quo order providing that NAI shall not take any actions that would disrupt the Board of Directors’ continuing management of the business and affairs of the Company in the ordinary course. The Delaware Actions are being managed under a coordination order. The Company is paying the expenses incurred in contesting the actions purportedly taken by NAI pursuant to its written consents.

On June 27, 2016, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a status quo order preserving the Board of Directors as constituted prior to the Purported Director Replacements during the pendency of the Delaware Actions.  The status quo order further provides that none of Viacom, the Board of Directors, any committee of the Board of Directors, any member of the Board of Directors or any Viacom executive officer, or any person acting at the direction of any of them, shall authorize, agree to, knowingly cause or permit or take, directly or indirectly, any action that is outside the routine day-to-day operations of Viacom and its subsidiaries taken as a whole (the “Consolidated Company”) without providing five business days’ prior written notice to NAI (which notice shall be treated confidentially). For purposes of the status quo order, “action that is outside the routine day-to-day operations” of the Consolidated Company includes in summary, but is not limited to:

The status quo order will remain in place until a final judgment is entered in the Delaware Actions (or until the Delaware Chancery Court enters a superseding order).

On July 1, 2016, Viacom filed an answer in the NAI Delaware Action, contesting the validity and effectiveness of the stockholder written consents delivered by NAI to Viacom on June 6th and June 16th. Mr. Salerno filed a joinder in that answer and asserted additional affirmative defenses. On July 11, 2016, the plaintiffs in the NAI Delaware Action filed motions for Judgment on the Pleadings in the NAI Delaware Action and motions to dismiss in the Salerno Delaware Action. On July 29, 2016, the Delaware Chancery Court denied all of the material motions. The case will now proceed to the discovery phase and the Delaware Chancery Court noted that it would schedule trial for the week of October 17, 2016.

On July 15, 2016, Viacom received “reservation of rights” letters from counsel to each of Mr. Dauman and Mr. Dooley. The letters were delivered in light of the Purported Director Replacements and note that Messrs. Dauman and Dooley are highly engaged in overseeing Viacom's operations and are committed to pursuing and executing Viacom's strategic plan for the duration of their respective employment agreements. The letters refer to each executive's right under his employment agreement to resign upon the occurrence of certain events that constitute “Good Reason” (subject to Viacom's opportunity to cure). The letters note the belief of the authors and each executive that such events have not occurred, but, in order to preserve their rights, each executive exercises the right to resign for “Good Reason” effective 31 days after the entry of a judicial order from which no appeal may be taken establishing the validity of the Purported Director Replacements, which could potentially result in significant costs to Viacom. The letters further note that if there is an entry of a judicial order from which no appeal may be taken establishing the invalidity of the Purported Director Replacements, the executives' resignation of employment shall not take effect.

Purported Class and Derivative Actions

Between June 17, 2016 and August 1, 2016, three substantially similar purported class action complaints were filed in the Delaware Chancery Court by purported Viacom stockholders, against Viacom, Viacom’s directors, NAI and the purported new directors named in NAI’s June 16th written consents. The complaints - brought on behalf of the class of all holders of Viacom Class B common stock except the named defendants and any person or entity affiliated with any of the defendants - allege claims for breaches of fiduciary duty against the incumbent director defendants and NAI. The purported new directors named in NAI’s June 16th written consents are alleged to have aided and abetted these breaches. In addition to damages and attorneys’ fees, the complaints seek declarations invalidating the June 2016 purported Bylaw amendments described above and “such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.” Viacom and certain Viacom directors have moved to dismiss the first two complaints and expect to shortly move to dismiss the third.

On July 20, 2016, a purported derivative action was commenced in Delaware Chancery Court by a purported Viacom stockholder against Viacom and its directors. The complaint alleges that Viacom’s directors breached their fiduciary duties to Viacom in connection with compensation paid to Mr. Redstone. These breaches, it is alleged, permitted a waste of corporate assets and the unjust enrichment of Mr. Redstone.

European Commission Statement of Objections

In July 2015, the Directorate-General for Competition (“DG Comp”) of the European Commission (the “Commission”) issued a Statement of Objections (the “SO”) to the six major Hollywood film studios, including Paramount, and to Sky UK (“Sky”), in connection with DG Comp's investigation into whether conventional territorial restrictions in agreements licensing content to pay television broadcasters impeded European Union (“EU”) single market imperatives in an anti-competitive way. The SO directed at Paramount takes issue with certain geo-filtering provisions in Paramount’s 2009 and 2014 agreements with Sky, which were designed to enforce the territorial nature of the content Paramount licenses for distribution on Sky’s online and mobile pay television platforms. In addition, the SO challenges certain provisions in the 2009 agreement regarding Sky’s satellite distribution of Paramount content. While we believe that Paramount's licensing practices in the EU have been consistent with the region's competition and other rules, rather than prolong the dispute, Viacom and Paramount have chosen to reach agreement with the Commission in the form of binding commitments related to the types of geo-filtering clauses permitted in premium pay television license agreements with broadcasters to the extent they restrict European Economic Area (“EEA”) broadcasters from responding to unsolicited requests by consumers located in a different territory in the EEA. The commitments permit Paramount to continue to license films through premium pay television license agreements in Europe on an exclusive territorial basis. No admission of liability has been made. In addition, the commitments eliminate the possibility of fines and enable the Commission to close similar pending cases against Viacom and Paramount relating to broadcasters in Italy, France, Germany and Spain. The Commission adopted the commitments on July 26, 2016, bringing the matter to conclusion apart from ongoing compliance monitoring.

VIACOM INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(continued)

NOTE 7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The components of stockholders’ equity are as follows:

(1) The components of other comprehensive loss are net of tax expense of $4 million and $16 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively.

Equity Awards

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016 , we granted 3.8 million stock options and 1.3 million restricted share units to employees with a weighted average grant date fair value of $8.65 and $38.86 per share, respectively.

The liability as of June 30, 2016 is related to future severance payments in connection with the restructuring plan undertaken in fiscal 2015, as further described in Note 14 of the 2015 Form 10-K. We anticipate that most of the liability associated with the restructuring plan will be paid by September 30, 2016.

NOTE 9. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing Net earnings attributable to Viacom by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The determination of diluted earnings per common share includes the weighted average number of common shares plus the dilutive effect of equity awards based upon the application of the treasury stock method. Anti-dilutive common shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.

The following table sets forth the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in determining basic and diluted earnings per common share and anti-dilutive common shares:

VIACOM INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(continued)

NOTE 10. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW AND OTHER INFORMATION

Our supplemental cash flow information is as follows:

Accounts Receivable

We had $549 million and $577 million of noncurrent trade receivables as of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. Accounts receivables are principally related to long-term television license arrangements at Filmed Entertainment and content distribution arrangements at Media Networks . These amounts are included within Other assets - noncurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such amounts are due in accordance with the underlying terms of the respective agreements with companies that are investment grade or with which we have historically done business under similar terms. We have determined that credit loss allowances are generally not considered necessary for these amounts.

Variable Interest Entities

In the normal course of business, we enter into joint ventures or make investments with business partners that support our underlying business strategy and provide us the ability to enter new markets to expand the reach of our brands, develop new programming and/or distribute our existing content. In certain instances, an entity in which we make an investment may qualify as a variable interest entity (“VIE”). In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we assess whether we have the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities : We have an unconsolidated investment in Prism TV Private Limited (“Prism”), a 50% owned joint venture in India that qualifies as a VIE. In connection with our investment, we do not have the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of Prism and therefore we do not qualify as the primary beneficiary. Our carrying value in Prism was $156 million and $145 million as of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 , respectively.

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities : Our Consolidated Balance Sheets include amounts related to consolidated VIEs totaling $194 million in assets and $57 million in liabilities as of June 30, 2016 , and $207 million in assets and $54 million in liabilities as of September 30, 2015 . The consolidated VIEs’ revenues, expenses and operating income were not significant for all periods presented.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 30.7% and 33.2% in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively. Net discrete tax benefit of $13 million reduced the effective income tax rate by 2.1 percentage points in the quarter and net discrete tax expense of $8 million contributed 0.4 percentage points to the effective income tax rate in the nine months. The net discrete tax benefit in the quarter was principally related to the release of tax reserves upon the remeasurement of excess foreign tax credits associated with the reorganization of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries in the fourth quarter of 2015. The net discrete tax expense in the nine month period was principally related to a reduction in qualified production activity tax benefits as a result of retroactively reenacted legislation, partially offset by reserve releases.

Our effective income tax rate was 31.8% and 32.2% in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2015 , respectively. Net discrete tax expense of $23 million in the nine months, taken together with restructuring and programming charges and a pension settlement loss, contributed 0.4 percentage points to the effective income tax rate. This net discrete tax expense was principally related to a reduction in qualified production activity tax benefits as a result of retroactively reenacted legislation, partially offset by reserve releases.

VIACOM INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(continued)

NOTE 11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 :

The fair value for marketable securities is determined utilizing a market approach based on quoted market prices in active markets at period end and the fair value for derivatives is determined utilizing a market-based approach.

The notional value of all foreign exchange contracts was $1.164 billion and $1.040 billion as of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. At June 30, 2016 , $752 million related to our foreign currency balances and $412 million related to future production costs. At September 30, 2015 , $769 million related to our foreign currency balances and $271 million related to future production costs.

NOTE 12. REPORTING SEGMENTS

The following tables set forth our financial performance by reporting segment. Our reporting segments have been determined in accordance with our internal management structure. We manage our operations through two reporting segments: (i)  Media Networks and (ii)  Filmed Entertainment . Typical intersegment transactions include the purchase of advertising by the Filmed Entertainment segment on Media Networks’ properties and the purchase of Filmed Entertainment’s feature films and television programming exhibition rights by Media Networks . The elimination of such intercompany transactions in the Consolidated Financial Statements is included within eliminations in the tables below.

 

Our measure of segment performance is adjusted operating income/(loss). Adjusted operating income/(loss) is defined as operating income/(loss), before equity-based compensation and certain other items identified as affecting comparability, including restructuring and programming charges, when applicable.