DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Company Overview

We are an international Independent Power Producer (“IPP”) that is active in the global clean energy production and waste-to-energy markets. We aspire to become a key player in these rapidly growing markets by developing or acquiring projects with clean energy technologies, including but not limited to waste-to-energy facilities that generate clean energy, such as electricity, natural gas, and heat, as well as soil amendment and other by-products. These markets provide tremendous opportunity, insofar as we believe there is a virtually endless supply of waste and organic material that can be used to generate power and valuable by-products. In particular, the disposal of organic material to landfills in most parts of the world is a costly problem with environmentally-damaging consequences. We seek to offer a cost-effective, environmentally-safe alternative.

What is Waste-to-Energy?

Waste-to-Energy is the process of generating energy in the form of electricity , natural gas and/or heat from the treatment of various forms of waste. Most waste-to-energy processes produce electricity and/or heat directly through combustion, or produce a combustible fuel commodity, such as methane, methanol or ethanol. Generally, waste-to-energy technology includes the following:

Incineration 

Incineration is the combustion of organic material such as waste with energy recovery, and is the most common waste-to-energy implementation. All new waste-to-energy plants in OECD countries (member and partner countries with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) incinerating waste must meet strict emission standards, including those on nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, heavy metals and dioxins. Hence, modern incineration plants are vastly different from the old types of plants, some of which recovered neither energy nor materials. Modern incinerators reduce the volume of the original waste by up to 96%, depending upon composition and degree of recovery of materials, such as metals from the ash for recycling.

Anaerobic Digestion 

Anaerobic digestion is a collection of processes by which microorganisms break down biodegradable material in the absence of oxygen. The process is used for industrial or domestic purposes to manage waste or to produce fuels. The digestion process begins with bacterial hydrolysis of the input materials. Insoluble organic polymers, such as carbohydrates, are broken down to soluble derivatives that become available for other bacteria. Acidogenic bacteria then convert the sugars and amino acids into carbon dioxide, hydrogen, ammonia, and organic acids. These bacteria convert these resulting organic acids into acetic acid, along with additional ammonia, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. Finally, methanogens convert these products to methane and carbon dioxide. The methanogenic archaea populations play an indispensable role in anaerobic wastewater treatments. Anaerobic digesters can also be fed with purpose-grown energy crops, such as maize. Anaerobic digestion is widely used as a source of renewable energy. The process produces a biogas, consisting of methane, carbon dioxide and traces of other ‘contaminant’ gases. This biogas can be used directly as fuel, in combined heat and power gas engines or upgraded to natural gas-quality biomethane. The nutrient-rich digestate also produced can be used as fertilizer.

Gasification 

Gasification is a process that converts organic or fossil fuel based carbonaceous materials into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. This is achieved by reacting the material at high temperatures (>700 °C), without combustion, with a controlled amount of oxygen and/or steam. The resulting gas mixture is called syngas (from synthesis gas or synthetic gas) or producer gas and is itself a fuel. The power derived from gasification and combustion of the resultant gas is considered to be a source of renewable energy if the gasified compounds were obtained from biomass. The advantage of gasification is that using the syngas is potentially more efficient than direct combustion of the original fuel because it can be combusted at higher temperatures or even in fuel cells, so that the thermodynamic upper limit to the efficiency defined by Carnot’s rule is higher or (in case of fuel cells) not applicable. Gasification can also begin with material which would otherwise have been disposed of such as biodegradable waste. In addition, the high-temperature process refines out corrosive ash elements such as chloride and potassium, allowing clean gas production from otherwise problematic fuels.

Pyrolysis 

Pyrolysis is a thermochemical decomposition of organic material at elevated temperatures in the absence of oxygen (or any halogen). It involves the simultaneous change of chemical composition and physical phase, and is irreversible. Pyrolysis is a type of thermolysis, and is most commonly observed in organic materials exposed to high temperatures. It is one of the processes involved in charring wood, starting at 200–300 °C (390–570 °F). It also occurs in fires where solid fuels are burning. In general, pyrolysis of organic substances produces gas and liquid products and leaves a solid residue richer in carbon content, char. Extreme pyrolysis, which leaves mostly carbon as the residue, is called carbonization.

There are a number of other new and emerging technologies that can be used to produce energy from waste and other fuels without direct combustion. Many of these technologies have the potential to produce more electric power from the same amount of fuel than would be possible by direct combustion. This is mainly due to the separation of corrosive components (ash) from the converted fuel, thereby allowing higher combustion temperatures in, for example, boilers, gas turbines and fuel cells.

We Build, Own & Operate Projects and We Acquire Projects

Our business model is based on two main activities: we are a Build, Own & Operate (BOO) company, and we are a strategic acquirer of already constructed and operational facilities. Our BOO projects further fall into four primary phases of progress, making up our development cycle as follows:

For our acquisition projects, we seek to acquire ongoing projects that are already constructed or operational.

Our Projects in All Phases

We are currently constructing or operating, or in negotiations to develop, as applicable, nineteen (19) projects related to our strategy of acquisition, development or operations of waste-to-energy facilities, which includes developing projects for which we have entered into nonbinding letters of intent to acquire additional biogas facilities in Italy and to develop and construct waste-to-energy facilities in the United States, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Israel. We continue to evaluate a pipeline of similar projects in the pre-development phase in the above listed countries, and we are also evaluating projects in other countries such as the Czech Republic, Poland, Canada and Mexico.

We are currently operating the following projects :

United States (operating)

Italy (operating) 

We currently have entered into definitive agreements to consummate the acquisition of the following projects:

Italy (consummating acquisition)

We currently have nonbinding letters of intent to develop the following projects :

United States (negotiating and/or conducting due diligence) 

Italy (negotiating and/or conducting due diligence)  

The Netherlands (developing and negotiating)  

The United Kingdom (negotiating and/or conducting due diligence)

We are currently negotiating, nonbinding letters of intent to develop the following projects :

Italy (negotiating and/or conducting due diligence)

Israel (negotiating and/or conducting due diligence)

Our strategy is to continue to expand in the future, including through acquisition of additional projects. From time to time, we negotiate, conduct due diligence and enter into nonbinding letters of intent for projects that we are evaluating. However, until due diligence is complete, further negotiations are finalized and the parties have executed a definitive agreement, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into any development or acquisition transaction, on the terms in the applicable letter of intent, if any, or at all, or any other similar arrangements. In the case of new construction projects for which we have not entered into definitive agreements, the power output identified herein reflects management’s position, determined based on a review of relevant factors including, but not limited to, pre-existing relationships with purchasers in the region, demand, land and facility space, environmental and engineering analysis, and the availability of feedstock and other sources of input. Furthermore, any such transactions that we do enter into would be subject to the uncertainties regarding our existing projects described in the “Risk Factors” section.

Our United States Projects

On October 19, 2012, we entered into definitive project agreements in respect of both the North Carolina and Rhode Island sites with Orbit Energy, Inc. (“Orbit”), pursuant to which we would be entitled to full ownership of each of the entities that owns the rights to implement the respective projects (Orbit Energy Charlotte, LLC (OEC) in the case of the North Carolina project and Orbit Energy Rhode Island, LLC (OERI) in the case of the Rhode Island project), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

Our North Carolina Project

* As discussed in more detail below, the Company anticipates that Andion Italy S.r.l. will assume the roles of EPC Provider and Operation, Service and Maintenance Provider.

Design and Development

On June 5, 2014, OEC entered into the NC Turnkey Agreement with Auspark, which amended and restated an original agreement dated April 30, 2014. Pursuant to the NC Turnkey Agreement, Auspark has provided, and presently continues to provide, the design, supply, engineering, permitting, procurement, assembly, construction, installation, commissioning and delivery of the North Carolina Facility, for the fixed price of $17,350,000, payable in accordance with meeting scheduled milestones, with the final payment becoming due upon delivery of a final completion certificate. As of March 31, 2017, approximately $15,400,000 in development fees have been paid to Auspark under the NC Turnkey Agreement. Payments under the NC Turnkey Agreement are funded by York Renewable Energy Partners LLC (“York”), our joint venture partner for the North Carolina project.

The term of the NC Turnkey Agreement is based on the project construction and workflow completion plan, subject to amendment pursuant to the terms of the agreement. Either party may terminate the NC Turnkey Agreement upon a substantial breach of performance following a 4-week cure period or the bankruptcy/insolvency of the other party. OEC may terminate for a gross violation of work quality subject to a 5-day cure period, or if Auspark loses the permits necessary to perform, and cannot cure such loss within 30 days. Auspark may terminate for failure of OEC to make specified reimbursements or failure of OEC to make payment within 30 days of demand. Austep guaranteed Auspark’s performance under the NC Turkey Agreement.

Upon effectiveness of the BULA, we anticipate that the NC Turnkey Agreement will be transferred to Andion, which will become responsible for performance thereunder. It is uncertain at this time whether Andion’s performance will be guaranteed by Andion’s parent entity. For more information, see the subsection below entitled “Austep Liquidation /Restructuring and Continuity of Performance at the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility”.

The Amended OEC Purchase Agreement

On November 19, 2014, we signed an amended and restated purchase agreement with Orbit for the North Carolina project (the “Amended OEC Purchase Agreement”). Subject to the terms of the Amended OEC Purchase Agreement, Orbit transferred full ownership of OEC to us in exchange for our agreeing to pay Orbit a development fee of $900,000, reimbursement of $17,764 of Orbit’s expenses, and an amount equal to 30% of the distributable cash flow from the North Carolina project after the project achieves a post-recoupment 30% internal rate of return computed on the basis of any and all benefits from tax credits, depreciation and other incentives of any nature. We also agreed to use high solid anaerobic digester units designed by Orbit (the “HSAD Units”) and to retain Orbit to implement and operate the HSAD Units for an annual management fee of $187,500 (the “OEC Management Fee”), subject to certain conditions. The Amended OEC Purchase Agreement provided that we had until December 15, 2014 to pay Orbit the development fee and reimbursement amount, which was extended to January 15, 2015 in exchange for payment by us to Orbit of $75,000. We did not subsequently pay Orbit the development fee and reimbursement amount and, pursuant to the terms of the Amended OEC Purchase Agreement, ownership of OEC reverted back to Orbit on January 15, 2015.

Concord Energy Partners, LLC

On January 30, 2015, (i) the Company, Concord Energy Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Concord”) and York entered into a development and indemnification agreement (the “Concord Development and Indemnification Agreement”), pursuant to which in 2015 York funded Concord’s payment to us of $1,250,000 in development fees used for developing the project, and Concord issued us 250 Series B units of Concord (“Concord Series B Units”) and issued 750 Series A units of Concord (“Concord Series A Units”) to York, and (ii) we and York entered into an amended and restated limited liability company operating agreement (the “Concord LLC Agreement”) to establish the Concord Series A Units and Concord Series B Units and admit us and York as 25% and 75% members of Concord, respectively. Purs uant to the foregoing agreements, York also agreed to fund Concord’s payment to us of two equal installments of $587,500 upon (a) mechanical completion of the North Carolina project and (b) commercial operation of the North Carolina project. On December 14, 2016, we received payment of the first installment. We expect to receive payment of the second installment by September 30, 2017.

Pursuant to the Concord LLC Agreement, our right to receive distributions from Concord are subject to certain priorities in favor of York, as follows: 

In addition, our right to receive distributions upon a liquidation event of Concord are subject to certain priorities in favor of York, as follows: 

Pursuant to the Concord LLC Agreement, Concord is managed by a board of managers initially consisting of three managers (the “Concord Board”). So long as York owns more than 50% of the membership interests of Concord, York is entitled to appoint two of the Concord Board’s three managers. So long as we own no less than 50% of the membership interests of Concord that we acquired pursuant to the Concord Development and Indemnification Agreement, we are entitled to appoint one manager of the Concord Board. York will make capital contributions to Concord in accordance with the budgeted investment amount for the North Carolina project set forth in the Concord LLC Agreement. In the event that the Concord Board determines in good faith that additional capital is needed by Concord and is in the best interests of the North Carolina project, the Concord Board may determine the amount of additional capital needed and issue new units to raise the necessary funds. In this case, if we do not exercise our pre-emptive right with respect to such units, our percentage interest in Concord would be reduced accordingly. The Concord LLC Agreement also contains certain restrictions on our right to transfer our membership interests in Concord to third parties. If we propose to sell any equity or assets relating to or in connection with the development, construction or operation of an energy generation facility to a third party prior to January 30, 2020, Entropy Investment Management LLC, an affiliate of York that provides project financing for renewable energy projects, will have a right of first refusal to acquire all or a portion of such sale.

The New OEC Purchase Agreement 

On January 30, 2015, we entered into the Orbit Energy Charlotte, LLC Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Orbit, Concord, and OEC (the “New OEC Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which (i) Concord purchased all of Orbit’s right, title and interest in and to the membership interests of OEC (the “OEC Interests”), (ii) Orbit abandoned all economic and ownership interest in the OEC Interests in favor of Concord, (iii) Orbit ceased to be a member of OEC and (iv) Concord was admitted as the sole member of OEC, in exchange for consideration of $917,764.

Under the Amended OEC Purchase Agreement and the New OEC Purchase Agreement, we had agreed to pay to Orbit the costs of evaluating and incorporating into the North Carolina project Orbit’s high solids anaerobic digestion technology and two HSAD Units designed by Orbit. Orbit was unable to design and install this technology into the North Carolina project, and we never paid any costs pursuant thereto. Instead, digesters were designed and provided by Auspark.

The New OEC Purchase Agreement also carried forward from the Amended OEC Purchase Agreement, and we indemnified York with respect to, our obligation to pay Orbit all amounts owed under the Amended OEC Purchase Agreement, including an amount equal to thirty percent (30%) of the North Carolina project’s distributable cash flow after we and the other equity investors in the North Carolina project fully recoup their respective investments in the North Carolina project (such investments to be calculated solely as amounts expended in and for the construction of the North Carolina project) and the North Carolina project achieves a thirty percent (30%) internal rate of return (the “NC Participation Fee”). The calculation of the project’s internal rate of return would take into account and be computed on the basis of any and all benefits from tax credits, depreciation and other incentives of any nature.

On January 13, 2017, the Company and Orbit entered into an agreement to eliminate the Company’s obligations to Orbit under the New OEC Purchase Agreement, the Concord LLC Agreement, the New OERI Purchase Agreement (defined below), and the Rhode Island LLC Agreement (defined below). In connection with the North Carolina project and the Rhode Island project, in exchange for an assignment to us of any rights to the NC Participation Fee and RI Participation Fee (defined below), and the termination of the OEC Management Fee and OERI Management Fee (defined below), Orbit will receive $200,000 in total, to be paid in twelve monthly equal installments, beginning on January 27, 2017.

The Operations of the North Carolina project  

On June 5, 2014, OEC entered into the NC O&M Agreement with Austep USA, whereby Austep USA will perform the day-to-day operation, management, service, and maintenance operations at the North Carolina Facility, for a term of 10 years beginning on the date that the facility achieves substantial completion, as defined in the NC Turnkey Agreement. For a period of two years following such date, Austep USA will guarantee annual production of 41,000,000 kWh of electricity for two years, and will use its best efforts to generate 42,640,000 kWh each year during the term. Austep USA will receive an aggregate fee of $1,153,000 per year under the agreement. Austep guaranteed Austep USA’s performance under the agreement.

Upon effectiveness of the BULA, we anticipate that the NC O&M Agreement will be transferred to Andion, which will become responsible for performance thereunder. It is uncertain at this time whether Andion’s performance will be guaranteed by Andion’s parent entity. For more information, see the subsection below entitled “Austep Liquidation /Restructuring and Continuity of Performance at the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility”.

OEC and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“Duke Energy”) are parties to an Amended and Restated Renewable Energy Purchase Agreement, dated October 12, 2012 and amended on April 25, 2013, January 31, 2014, January 29, 2015 and September 30, 2016 (as amended, the “Duke PPA”), pursuant to which OEC has agreed to sell, and Duke has agreed to purchase, the energy output of OEC’s facility, subject to the terms and conditions of the Duke PPA. Among other things, the Duke PPA required OEC to commence commercial operations by December 31, 2015 or, if not operational within 60 days of such date, pay Duke Energy $500,000 of liquidated damages, which would then extend the deadline for commercial operation to March 30, 2016. Since the commercial operations had not been commenced within 60 days of December 31, 2015, OEC was required to pay $500,000 of liquidated damages to Duke Energy pursuant to the Duke PPA during the first quarter of 2016, and York contributed these funds to OEC. The deadline for commercial operation was thereafter extended to November 23, 2016 by amendment to the Duke PPA. The Duke PPA is effective until August 21, 2030. The loss of Duke Energy as a customer of OEC could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Duke PPA further provides that OEC is responsible for certain interconnections fees and the costs and charges in connection with delivering power to the delivery point. OEC is responsible for delivering 100% of the output nameplate capacity of 5.2MW, and Duke Energy is responsible for purchasing up to the nameplate capacity. During the term of the Duke PPA, the bundled price payable to OEC is fixed per MWh, together with fixed prices per year for specified categories of RECs, as well as minimum REC requirements and purchase obligations during the term. Duke Energy is not responsible for purchasing additional energy or renewable energy attributes which exceeds 10% of the facility’s nameplate capacity. If OEC does not deliver up to the nameplate capacity, it must pay damages equal to specified replacement REC costs.

OEC is projected to require about 424 tons of organic feedstock on a daily basis and is working with organic waste suppliers to arrange supplies of feedstock. As of today, we believe we have all definitive agreements needed to supply all feedstock needed for operation of the North Carolina project.

On or about November 18, 2016, the North Carolina project connected to the grid, began commissioning and thereafter commenced commercial operations and started to provide output to Duke Energy pursuant to the Duke PPA. The North Carolina Facility is currently in the mechanical completion and ramp-up phase of the project. Commencement of the commercial operations includes the gradual intake of waste from the facility’s feedstock suppliers, increasing the parasitic load to the digesters, completing the waste-water-treatment resources and completing all other mechanical features needed for the facility to operate at full capacity. The Company estimates that the North Carolina project will be fully completed by September 30, 2017.

With respect to the North Carolina project, we have recognized revenue from services in the amount of $1,586,000 in the fiscal year 2015, and equity earnings in nonconsolidated affiliates in the amount of $5,960,946 and revenue from services in the amount of $587,500 in fiscal year 2016. We have recognized equity earnings in nonconsolidated affiliates in the amount of $367,000 in the first fiscal quarter of 2017.

Our Rhode Island Project

* As discussed in more detail below, the Company anticipates that Andion Italy S.r.l. will assume the role of EPC Provider.

Design and Development

On April 7, 2015, OERI entered into the RI Turnkey Agreement with Auspark, which amended and restated an original agreement dated April 30, 2014. Pursuant to the RI Turnkey Agreement, Auspark has provided, and presently continues to provide, the design, supply, engineering, permitting, procurement, assembly, construction, installation, commissioning and delivery of the Rhode Island Facility, for the fixed price of $13,800,000, payable in accordance with meeting scheduled milestones, with the final payment becoming due upon delivery of a final completion certificate. As of March 31, 2017, approximately $11,800,000 in development fees have been paid to Auspark under the RI Turnkey Agreement. Payments under the RI Turnkey Agreement are funded by York, our joint venture partner for the Rhode Island project.

The term of the RI Turnkey Agreement is based on the project construction and workflow completion plan, subject to amendment pursuant to the terms of the agreement. Either party may terminate the RI Turnkey Agreement upon a substantial breach of performance following a 4-week cure period or the bankruptcy/insolvency of the other party. OERI may terminate for a gross violation of work quality subject to a 5-day cure period, or if Auspark loses the permits necessary to perform, and cannot cure such loss within 30 days. Auspark may terminate for failure of OERI to make specified reimbursements or failure of OERI to make payment within 30 days of demand. Austep guaranteed Auspark’s performance under the RI Turnkey Agreement. 

Upon effectiveness of the BULA, we anticipate that the RI Turnkey Agreement will be transferred to Andion, which will become responsible for performance thereunder. It is uncertain at this time whether Andion’s performance will be guaranteed by Andion’s parent entity. For more information, see the subsection below entitled “Austep Liquidation /Restructuring and Continuity of Performance at the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility”.

The Amended OEC Purchase Agreement 

On January 7, 2015, we signed an amended and restated purchase agreement with Orbit for the Rhode Island project (the “Amended OERI Purchase Agreement”). Subject to the terms of the Amended OERI Purchase Agreement, Orbit transferred full ownership of OERI to us in exchange for our agreeing to pay Orbit a development fee of $300,000, reimbursement of $86,432 of Orbit’s expenses, and an amount equal to 30% of the distributable cash flow from the Rhode Island project after the project achieves a post-recoupment 30% internal rate of return computed on the basis of any and all benefits from tax credits, depreciation and other incentives of any nature. We also agreed to use HSAD Units designed by Orbit and to retain Orbit to implement and operate the HSAD Units for an annual management fee of $187,500 (the “OERI Management Fee”), subject to certain conditions. The Amended OERI Purchase Agreement provided that we had until January 22, 2015 to pay Orbit the development fee and reimbursement amount, which was extended to February 28, 2015 in exchange for payment by us to Orbit of $31,000. We did not subsequently pay Orbit the development fee and reimbursement amount and, pursuant to the terms of the Amended OERI Purchase Agreement, ownership of OERI reverted back to Orbit.

Rhode Island Energy Partners, LLC 

On April 8, 2015, (i) the Company, Rhode Island Energy Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Rhode Island”) and York entered into a development and indemnification agreement (the “Rhode Island Development and Indemnification Agreement”), pursuant to which York funded Rhode Island’s payment to us of development fees of $1,541,900 used for developing the project, and Rhode Island issued us 2,275 Series B units of Rhode Island (“Rhode Island Series B Units), and issued 7,725 Series A units of Rhode Island (“Rhode Island Series A Units”) to York, and (ii) we and York entered into an amended and restated limited liability company operating agreement (the “Rhode Island LLC Agreement”) to establish the Rhode Island Series A Units and Rhode Island Series B Units and admit us and York as 22.75% and 77.25% members of Rhode Island, respectively. Pursuant to the foregoing agreements, York also agreed to fund Concord’s payment to us of three equal installments of $562,500 upon (a) signing of the Rhode Island Development and Indemnification Agreement, (b) the later of (x) the date of mechanical completion of the Rhode Island project and (y) the date on which an executed interconnection agreement between OERI and National Grid, including receipt of any regulatory approvals from the Rhode Island Public Utility Commission, is delivered by OERI, and (c) commercial operation of the Rhode Island project. To date, York has made payment of the first $562,500 installment.

Pursuant to the Rhode Island LLC Agreement, our right to receive distributions from OERI are subject to certain priorities in favor of York, as follows: 

In addition, our right to receive distributions upon a liquidation event of Rhode Island are subject to certain priorities in favor of York, as follows: 

Pursuant to the Rhode Island LLC Agreement, Rhode Island is managed by a board of managers initially consisting of three managers (the “Rhode Island Board”). So long as York owns more than 50% of the membership interests of Rhode Island, York is entitled to appoint two of the Rhode Island Board’s three managers. So long as we own no less than 50% of the membership interests of Rhode Island that we acquired pursuant to the Rhode Island Development and Indemnification Agreement, we are entitled to appoint one manager of the Rhode Island Board. York will make capital contributions to Rhode Island in accordance with the budgeted investment amount for the North Carolina project set forth in the Concord LLC Agreement. In the event that the Rhode Island Board determines in good faith that additional equity capital is needed by Rhode Island and is in the best interests of the Rhode Island project, the Rhode Island Board may determine the amount of additional capital needed and issue new units to raise the necessary funds. In this case, if we do not exercise our pre-emptive right with respect to such units, our percentage interest in Rhode Island would be reduced accordingly. The Rhode Island LLC Agreement also contains certain restrictions on our right to transfer our membership interests in Rhode Island to third parties. If we propose to sell any equity or assets relating to or in connection with the development, construction or operation of an energy generation facility to a third party prior to April 8, 2020, Entropy Investment Management LLC will have a right of first refusal to acquire all or a portion of such sale.

The New OERI Purchase Agreement 

On April 8, 2015, we entered into the Orbit Energy Rhode Island, LLC Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Orbit, Rhode Island and OERI (the “New OERI Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which (i) Rhode Island purchased all of Orbit’s right, title and interest in and to the membership interests of OERI (the “OERI Interests”), (ii) Orbit abandoned all economic and ownership interest in the OERI Interests in favor of Rhode Island, (iii) Orbit ceased to me a member of OERI and (iv) Rhode Island was admitted as the sole member of OERI, in exchange for consideration of $386,432.

Under the Amended OERI Purchase Agreement and the New OERI Purchase Agreement, we had agreed to pay to Orbit the costs of evaluating and incorporating into the Rhode Island project Orbit’s high solids anaerobic digestion technology and two HSAD Units designed by Orbit. Orbit was unable to design and install this technology into the Rhode Island project, and we never paid any costs pursuant thereto. Instead, digesters were designed and provided by Auspark.

The New OERI Purchase Agreement also carried forward from the Amended OERI Purchase Agreement, and we indemnified York with respect to, our obligation to pay Orbit all amounts owed under the Amended OERI Purchase Agreement, including an amount equal to thirty percent (30%) of the Rhode Island project’s distributable cash flow after we and the other equity investors in the Rhode Island project fully recoup our respective investments in the Rhode Island project (such investments to be calculated solely as amounts expended in and for the construction of the Rhode Island project) and the Rhode Island project achieves a thirty percent (30%) internal rate of return (the “RI Participation Fee”). The calculation of the project’s internal rate of return would take into account and be computed on the basis of any and all benefits from tax credits, depreciation and other incentives of any nature.

On January 13, 2017, the Company and Orbit entered into an agreement to eliminate the Company’s obligations to Orbit under the New OEC Purchase Agreement, the Concord LLC Agreement, the New OERI Purchase Agreement, and the Rhode Island LLC Agreement. In connection with the North Carolina project and the Rhode Island project, in exchange for an assignment to us of any rights to the NC Participation Fee and RI Participation Fee, and the termination of the OEC Management Fee and OERI Management Fee, Orbit will receive $200,000 in total, to be paid in twelve monthly equal installments, beginning on January 27, 2017.

The Operations of the Rhode Island project

OERI is currently negotiating a service, maintenance and operation agreement to perform the day-to-day operation, management, service, and maintenance activities at the Rhode Island Facility.

OERI and The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid (“National Grid”) are parties to a Power Purchase Agreement, dated May 26, 2011 and amended on April 11, 2013, December 9, 2013, January 9, 2015 and May 27, 2016 (as amended, the “National Grid PPA”), pursuant to which OERI has agreed to sell, and National Grid has agreed to purchase, the energy output of OERI’s facility, subject to the terms and conditions of the National Grid PPA. Among other things, the National Grid PPA required OERI to commence commercial operations by December 31, 2015, which could be extended up to six months by OERI upon deposit of $22,500 of collateral. Since commercial operations were not commenced by December 31, 2015, OERI paid an additional “Development Period Security” of $22,500 pursuant to the National Grid PPA, such funds having been contributed to OERI by York. On May 27 2016, National Grid agreed to modify the date to commence commercial operations to June 30, 2017. As an incentive and evidence of good faith to achieve commercial operation, OERI posted additional collateral in the amount of $22,500, such funds having been contributed to OERI by York. The National Grid PPA is effective for 15 years from the date commercial operations are commenced, which may be extended by 6 years at the option of National Grid. The loss of National Grid as a customer of OERI could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The National Grid PPA further provides that OERI is responsible for certain interconnections fees, subject to an adjustment based on MWh sold under the agreement, and the costs and charges in connection with delivering power to the interconnection point. OERI is responsible for delivering 100% of the output nameplate capacity of up to 3.2MW, and National Grid is responsible for purchasing up to our nameplate capacity. National Grid is not responsible for purchasing additional energy in excess of the specified maximum amount. During the term of the agreement, National Grid will pay a fixed bundled price per MWh for energy and RECs, subject to escalation by a factor of 2% annually. If OERI fails to deliver energy in accordance with the National Grid PPA, it will be responsible for specified replacement damages.

On or about June 23, 2017, the Rhode Island project connected to the grid, began commissioning and thereafter commenced commercial operations and started to provide output to National Grid pursuant to the National Grid PPA. The Rhode Island Facility is currently in the mechanical completion and ramp-up phase of the project. Commencement of the commercial operations includes the gradual intake of waste from the facility’s feedstock suppliers, increasing the parasitic load to the digesters, completing the waste-water-treatment resources and completing all other mechanical features needed for the facility to operate at full capacity. The Company estimates that the Rhode Island project will be fully completed by October 30, 2017.

OERI and Renewable Organics Management LLC are parties to an Organic Waste Delivery Agreement, dated October 13, 2016, in respect of 80,000 tons per year of organic feedstock. This agreement has a five-year term, subject to renewal, and begins upon commencement of operations, at which time feedstock will be supplied to the Rhode Island project. OERI is projected to require 80,000 tons per year of organic feedstock on a daily basis, so the quantity represented by this agreement is expected to satisfy 100% of facility’s feedstock requirements for operations.

As of March 31, 2017, we have recorded deferred revenue from nonconsolidated affiliates in the amount of $5,888,000 with respect to our the Rhode Island project. Because the Rhode Island project connected to the grid on June 23, 2017, our share of any net earnings (losses) generated by the Rhode Island project will now be recognized as equity earnings in nonconsolidated affiliates in our Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ending June 30, 2017.

Austep Liquidation /Restructuring and Continuity of Performance at the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility

From the Official Records, the Company learned that on June 20, 2017, Austep was put in voluntary liquidation by shareholders’ resolution pursuant the Italian Civil Code and on June 30, 2017, Austep filed a petition in the Bankruptcy Court of Milan (Milan Court) for a creditors’ settlement procedure pursuant to Italian Bankruptcy Law. On July 6, 2017, the Milan Court approved Austep’s petition for a creditors’ settlement procedure and declared that Austep shall, by November 3, 2017, submit (i) the final debt restructuring plan and (ii) a request for certification of the restructuring agreement’s debts. For more information concerning the foregoing, see the subsection entitled “Change in Operator in Italy and Transfer of North Carolina and Rhode Island Project Agreements” in the “Prospectus Summary” section of this prospectus.

According to the Official Records, on June 29, 2017, Austep entered into a Business Unit Lease Agreement (BULA) with Andion Italy S.r.l., with the intent of assuring the regular operation of certain operations and agreements by Andion. Andion is wholly owned by Arcus Holdings Sa, a Luxembourg entity owned by White Cloud Capital II SCSp, which controls Austep Holdings S.p.A. Austep Holdings S.p.A. wholly-owns Austep and Austep USA, and Austep USA wholly-owns Auspark LLC and Austep Rhode Island LLC. Andion is not subject to the liquidation/restructuring of Austep.

The BULA provides for, among other things, the transfer of Austep’s entire United States operations and, accordingly, the agreements relating to the operation of our North Carolina Facility and Rhode Island Facility; specifically, the NC Turnkey Agreement, NC O&M Agreement and RI Turnkey Agreement. The term of the BULA is three (3) months from the effective date of the BULA, and will automatically renew if not terminated by one of the parties with at least thirty (30) days’ written notice. The BULA will become effective upon execution by all parties, and is subject to finalization of negotiations with unions regarding all employees who will not be transferred with the BULA.

Presently, the NC Turnkey Agreement, NC O&M Agreement and RI Turnkey Agreement are validly in force, and the parties continue to operate, maintain, and supervise the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility in accordance with the terms of such agreements. When the BULA becomes effective, we anticipate that Andion will continue to operate, maintain, and supervise the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility for the foreseeable future.

Our 2015 Italy Projects

The Acquisition of Our Italy Projects  

On May 14, 2015, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Italy Projects Agreement”) with Volteo Energie S.p.A., Agriholding S.r.l., and Overland S.r.l. (each, a “Seller” and collectively, the “Sellers”) through our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, Bluesphere Pavia (formerly Bluesphere Italy S.r.l.). Pursuant to the Italy Projects Agreement, we agreed to purchase one hundred percent (100%) of the share capital of four SPVs, Agricerere S.r.l., Agrielektra S.r.l., Agrisorse S.r.l. and Gefa S.r.l, from the Sellers, who collectively held all of the outstanding share capital of each SPV. Each SPV is engaged in the owning and operating of an anaerobic digestion biogas plant for the production and sale of electricity to Gestore del Servizi Energetici GSE, S.p.A., a state-owned company, pursuant to the SPVs PPA. All references to, and descriptions of, the Italy Projects Agreement incorporate the terms of an amendment to the same entered into by the parties on December 14, 2015.

Pursuant to the Italy Projects Agreement, we agreed to pay an aggregate purchase price of €5,600,000 for all of the SPVs, which, upon the application of certain credits applied, was adjusted to €5,200,000 (USD $5,646,628) (the “Purchase Price”). Fifty percent (50%) of the Purchase Price, less certain credits, was due to the Sellers on the Closing Date and the remaining balance along with interest at a rate of two percent (2%) per year (“the deferred payment”), less certain credits, is due to the Sellers on the third anniversary of the Closing Date. The Purchase Price is subject to certain adjustments and to an adjustment based on the actual EBITDA results in the 18 months following the Closing Date, per the following mechanism: 

Under the Italy Projects agreement, EBITDA is defined as “total cash revenues received minus all cash expenditures made during the relevant period excluding principle and interest payments due to the bank and taxes”.

As of the date of this prospectus, the Company is preparing its adjustment proposal to the Purchase Price based on the actual EBITDA results in the 18 months following the Closing Date, and anticipates sending to the Seller prior to July 31, 2017. The Seller may reject, accept or, if the Seller does not respond within 30 days, will be deemed to have accepted the adjustment proposal. If the Seller rejects the adjustment proposal, the matter will be decided in binding arbitration.

Pursuant to the Italy Projects Agreement, the Company will reimburse the Sellers the VAT amount that was requested and will be requested by the SPVs for the fiscal year of 2014. The reimbursed amount will not exceed €1,160,425 and will be refunded to the Sellers only after the amount is refunded to Blue Sphere Pavia by the VAT authorities in Italy. Pursuant to the Italy Projects Agreement, we also issued a corporate guarantee to the Sellers, whereby the Company will secure the obligations of Blue Sphere Pavia under the Italy Projects Agreement.

On December 14, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Italy Projects Agreement, we completed the acquisitions of one hundred percent (100%) of the share capital of the “SPVs. On the Closing Date, the Company paid an amount of €1,952,858 (USD $2,143,181), which represented fifty percent (50%) of the Purchase Price adjusted for certain post-closing adjustments and closing costs. The remaining balance of the Purchase Price (balance less the adjusted closing payment) is promised by a note accruing interest at an annual rate of two percent (2%) to each Seller, with such principal and interest accrued due to each Seller on or before the third anniversary of the Closing Date, subject to adjustment to the variation of EBITDA, as described above. The portion of the Purchase Price and all closing costs, pre-closing receivables, fees and related expenses paid at closing were primarily financed by a loan of €2,900,000, obtained pursuant to the Helios Loan Agreement, of which €200,000 was repaid to Helios in March 2016.

The closing of the Italy Projects Agreement was subject to certain conditions precedent including, but not limited to, obtaining consent to the proposed sale and resulting change of control from Banca IMI S.p.A. (“the SPVs’ lender”) in connection with a certain €22,080,000 Financing Agreement, dated February 25, 2013, between the SPVs, Banca IMI S.p.A. and Intesa San Paolo S.p.A. (the “SPV Financing Agreement”), as well as from other counterparties to certain agreements to which the SPVs are a party. Amounts outstanding under the SPV Financing Agreement are secured by the assets of the SPVs. After the Closing Date, the SPV’s paid a waiver fee of approximately €109,000 to the SPVs’ lender, such amount representing 50% of the fees and expenses charged by the lenders in connection with obtaining these consents. In addition, under the Italy Projects Agreement, the Sellers granted us a special credit of €100,000 per SPV, half of which is allocable to each payment of the Purchase Price. Following the achievement of key milestones under the SPV Financing Agreement, on December 21, 2016, we agreed with the SPVs’ lender to certain revised terms under the SPV Financing Agreement for each SPV, specifically (a) each SPV received a new VAT line of credit equal to €300,000 per SPV, and an extension to each SPV’s existing VAT line of credit for one year, (b) our obligation to fund a debt service reserve account deposit totaling €1,100,000 was terminated, and (c) a minimum cash requirement of €200,000 per account was removed. In addition, on December 21, 2016, the SPVs’ lender also officially approved the Framework EBITDA Agreement. As of December 31, 2016, €18,326,646 was outstanding under the SPV Financing Agreement.

The Operations of the 2015 Italy Projects

Termination of Our Agreements with Austep to Operate, Maintain and Supervise the SPV Facilities

As discussed more fully below, the Company has terminated all four Plant EBITDA Agreements with Austep on July 18, 2017. Notwithstanding, these facilities are currently operating and the Company is in the process of replacing Austep with a new operator. The Company believes that the termination of the Plant EBITDA Agreements with Austep and the engagement of a new operator will result in the facilities being operated under terms that are more advantageous to the Company, which the Company believes will improve profitability. Therefore, the Company believes that there will ultimately be no material negative impact resulting from this change in operating partner.

On July 17, 2015, we entered into a Framework EBITDA Agreement with Austep, pursuant to which Austep performed technical analyses of operating anaerobic digestion plants in Italy that we identified as potential acquisition targets. If and when we acquired such anaerobic digestion plants in Italy, we and Austep had agreed to negotiate individual agreements pursuant to which Austep would operate, maintain and supervise each plant and guarantee agreed-upon levels of EBITDA to us for a specified period. On the Closing Date, all four SPVs entered into Plant EBITDA Agreements with Austep. In accordance with the Plant EBITDA Agreements, Austep operated, maintained and supervised each biogas plant owned by the SPVs until July 12, 2017. The Plant EBITDA Agreements provided that we would receive an annual aggregate EBITDA of €3,760,000 for the four SPVs, collectively, and that Austep would receive ninety percent (90%) of the revenue in excess of such levels.

On July 12, 2017, Austep personnel shut down the engines at all of the SPV Facilities, and exited all four sites. The Company immediately notified Banca IMI, the SPVs’ lender, and began coordinating with Banca IMA on its remedial action plan. The Company believes that Austep’s failure to perform under the Plant EBITDA Agreements was due to a liquidation/restructuring of Austep. From the Official Records, the Company learned that on June 20, 2017, Austep was put in voluntary liquidation by shareholders’ resolution pursuant the Italian Civil Code and on June 30, 2017, Austep filed a petition in the Bankruptcy Court of Milan (Milan Court) for a creditors’ settlement procedure pursuant to Italian Bankruptcy Law. On July 6, 2017, the Milan Court approved Austep’s petition for a creditors’ settlement procedure and declared that Austep shall, by November 3, 2017, submit (i) the final debt restructuring plan and (ii) a request for certification of the restructuring agreement’s debts. For more information concerning the foregoing, see the subsection entitled “Change in Operator in Italy and Transfer of North Carolina and Rhode Island Project Agreements” in the “Prospectus Summary” section of this prospectus.

On July 14, 2017, the Company notified Austep’s liquidator, in accordance with the Plant EBITDA Agreements, that because (i) Austep had neglected specified contractual obligations concerning maintenance of the SPV Facilities, which each SPV had notified Austep of on June 21, 2017, and (ii) Austep, without notice, abandoned the SPV facilities, the Company had taken over direct management and supervision of the SPV Facilities to ensure their proper operation, safety and security. The Company reserved all rights to claim any and all damages arising as a consequence of Austep’s conduct, including costs incurred by the Company in its intervention.

On July 18, 2017, the SPVs delivered to Austep a notice of termination of the Plant EBITDA Agreements due to several breaches of Austep’s obligations, representations and warranties thereunder including without limitation those outlined in the notice provided to Austep’s liquidator on July 14, 2017. The Company further notified Austep that, as a consequence of early termination, (i) it is obligated to pay to a penalty of €85,000 to each SPV, and (ii) that Austep will be deemed liable to hold the SPVs harmless and indemnified for any direct and indirect losses (including loss of business), damages, costs of engaging replacement contractors and suppliers, costs relating to the supply of feedstock for years 2017 through 2018, insurance premium costs, costs incurred in connection with the financing facility agreement with Banca IMI, and any other expenses or other liabilities incurred or to be incurred by the SPVs as a consequence of or in connection with Austep’s breaches, actions and/or omissions under the Plant EBITDA Agreements. The notice was prepared in coordination with Banca IMI.

The Company will withhold its costs and damages arising from the loss in generation at the SPV Facilities, and the costs or remediating and implementing its short-term and long-term operational solutions, from any amounts payable to Austep under the terminated Plant EBITDA Agreements.

Continuity of Performance of the SPV Facilities

Upon initially learning of Austep’s liquidation/restructuring, the Company began planning and implementing a remedial action plan designed to insure minimal disruption to the SPV Facilities, provide for the short-term and long-term operation of the SPV Facilities on equal or better terms, and hold Austep accountable for any economic losses incurred as a result of the foregoing.

The Interim Operating Agreement. As discussed above, the Company notified Austep’s liquidator that the Company had taken over direct management and supervision of the SPV Facilities on July 14, 2017. On the same date, the Company entered into an Interim Operation Agreement with La Fenice, an Italian company experienced in the operation of biogas plants, pursuant to which La Fenice will immediately operate and supervise the SPV Facilities. The Interim Operation Agreement provides that we will pay La Fenice €10,000 + VAT per facility per month. The Interim Operation Agreement renews automatically each month, unless terminated by either party. The Company and La Fenice are operating pursuant to the Interim Operation Agreement, and are presently negotiating a definitive agreement.

The SPV Facilities were not being operated or supervised for approximately three days after Austep abandoned the facilities. Pursuant to the Interim Operation Agreement, La Fenice personnel were on-site at the SPV Facilities on July 14, 2017 and began start-up of the engines at each facility. The SPV Facilities have begun transmitting electricity to the grid, and we anticipate that by August 5, 2017, all SPV Facilities will be generating at full capacity.

Long-Term Operational Plans. The Company intends for the Interim Operation Agreement to serve as a short-term solution to remediate any potential losses resulting from Austep’s breach of performance and its liquidation/restructuring. The Company is also currently negotiating with multiple prospective operators who can perform full-service operation, maintenance, and supervision of the SPV Facilities, and supply feedstock to the SPV Facilities, on equal or better terms than Austep under the now-terminated Plant EBITDA Agreements. The Company has also asked the prospective operators to assess and report on the current situation at each of the SPV Facilities and address any measures, actions or improvements that it recommends.

On July 13, 2017, the Company received a binding proposal for services from a primary biogas plant operator pursuant to which the operator will perform operation, maintenance, and supervision of the SPV Facilities for the duration of the SPVs PPA for €419,623 plus 22% VAT per facility per year. The operator has agreed to guarantee annual gross revenues of €2,150,000 per facility, subject to certain assumptions consistent with historical performance. To the extent that annual gross revenues exceed the specified threshold, the operator would be entitled to 50% of such excess. In addition, the SPVs and the operator would share equally in savings from consumption reductions resulting from management or technical improvements designed and implemented by the operator.

The Company anticipates receipt of an additional binding proposal from a prospective operator. The Company intends to have the SPVs enter into definitive agreements with a long-term operator for the operation, maintenance, and supervision of the SPV Facilities, by August 4, 2017; however, the Company cannot make any guarantees that it will be successful in entering into any such definitive agreement within this time frame or that it will be successful in negotiating terms and conditions favorable to the Company.

SPV Management Agreements

On December 21, 2016, each SPV entered into a Management Agreement with BlueSphere Pavia (each, an “SPV Management Agreement”), as approved by the SPVs’ lender. The SPV Management Agreement for each SPV is in substantially the same form. In addition to other customary terms, each SPV Management Agreement is for a term of 5 years, automatically renewable for subsequent 5 year terms, and provides that each SPV will pay a fee of €112,800 per year to BlueSphere Pavia, in exchange for administration, technical and professional services. Either party may terminate the SPV Management Agreement upon 3 months’ notice. Each SPV Management Agreement further provides that in the case of an event of default under the respective SPV Financing Agreement, the payment of fees to BlueSphere Pavia under the SPV Management Agreement will be suspended and, if applicable, subordinated to the full satisfactions of the SPVs’ lender’s rights under the SPV Financing Agreement.

The Helios Loan Agreement 

On August 18, 2015, we and two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Eastern Sphere Ltd. (“Eastern Sphere”), the parent of Blue Sphere Pavia, and Blue Sphere Pavia, entered into a Long Term Mezzanine Loan Agreement (the “Helios Loan Agreement”) with Helios Italy Bio-Gas 1 L.P. (“Helios”) to finance the Italy Projects Agreement. Under the Helios Loan Agreement, Helios made up to five million euros (€5,000,000) available to Blue Sphere Pavia (the “Helios Loan”) to finance (a) ninety percent (90%) of the total required investment of the first four SPVs acquired, (b) seventy to eighty percent (70-80%) of the total required investment of up to three SPVs subsequently acquired, if applicable, (c) certain broker fees incurred in connection with the acquisitions, and (d) any taxes associated with registration of an equity pledge agreement (as described below). Each financing of an SPV acquisition will be subject to specified conditions precedent and will constitute a separate loan under the Helios Loan Agreement. Helios’s obligation to provide additional funds under the Helios Loan Agreement, in connection with subsequently acquired SPVs, terminated on June 30, 2016.

As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under the Helios Loan was $2,607,000. Subject to specified terms, representations and warranties, the Helios Loan Agreement provides that each loan thereunder will accrue interest at a rate of fourteen and one-half percent (14.5%) per annum, and that Helios is entitled to an annual operation fee of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per annum. Payments of principal, interest and the operation fee are due and payable quarterly. The final payment for each loan will become due no later than the earlier of (a) thirteen and one half years from the date such loan was made available to Blue Sphere Pavia, and (b) the date that the license to produce electricity granted to the relevant SPV expires. Pursuant to the Helios Loan Agreement and an equity pledge agreement, Eastern Sphere pledged all its shares in Blue Sphere Pavia to secure all loan amounts utilized under the Helios Loan Agreement.

In addition, the Helios Loan Agreement provides for no prepayment of the outstanding amount; however, subject to Helios’ right of first refusal and following 5 years from the date of closing, we may prepay upon meeting certain conditions, including that the net consideration of such prepayment will be the principal amount of the Helios Loan, less loan principal, interest and operation fees previously paid, multiplied by 2.12. The Helios Loan Agreement is subject to certain standard events of default subject to a 7-day cure period, including our failure to make two consecutive installment payments or pay the operations fee, events of insolvency or liquidation, and the declaration of an event of default under each the SPV Financing Agreement. 

On December 2015, we borrowed €2,900,000 (USD $3,149,000) under the Helios Loan Agreement to finance the purchase of the SPVs, of which €200,000 was repaid to Helios in March 2016. No additional funds have since been borrowed.

Our 2017 Italy Projects

The Udine, Italy Acquisition  

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Udine SPA”) with Pronto Verde A.G. (“Pronto Verde”), relating to the purchase of one hundred percent (100%) of the share capital of Futuris Papia S.r.l., a limited liability company organized under the laws of Italy (the “Udine SPV”), which owns and operates a 0.995 Kw plant for the production of electricity from vegetal oil located in Udine, Italy.

We agreed to pay an aggregate purchase price of €2,358,000 (USD $2,673,000) for the Udine SPV (the “Udine Purchase Price”), subject to an adjustment formula accounting for the Udine SPV’s net financial position, net working capital, and certain net receivables, to be calculated on the basis of the Udine SPV’s interim financial statement at the closing. The Udine Purchase Price will be paid to Pronto Verde at the closing, less (a) €1,290,000 (USD $1,462,000) to repay the balance of a mortgage loan on the Udine SPV (the “Udine Loan”); (b) a brokerage fee payable by Pronto Verde in the amount of €100,000 (USD $113,000); and (c) €100,000 (USD $113,000) to be held in escrow. The balance thereafter payable, if any, to Pronto Verde will be paid by September 30, 2017, including €150,000 (USD $179,000) payable by the Udine SPV. The Udine Purchase Price is subject to post-closing adjustment, to be calculated on the basis of the Udine SPV’s final closing financial statements, as audited.

On July 12, 2017, we entered into an Amendment Agreement to the SPA with Pronto Verde and Bluesphere Italy S.r.l., an Italian limited liability company and our wholly-owned subsidiary, whereby we assigned all of our rights, titles or interests arising out of the SPA to Bluesphere Italy S.r.l. The parties also agreed to change the closing date to July 31, 2017.

The closing in relation to the Udine SPV will be on or before July 31, 2017, and any such closing is subject to specified conditions precedent including, but not limited to, consummation of an acquisition of all share capital of the Udine SPV by Pronto Verde from the owners of the Udine SPV, and receipt of consent from the lender and confirmation to accept repayment of the Udine Loan.

The Cantu, Italy Acquisition

Also on June 29, 2017, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Cantu SPA”) with Pronto Verde, relating to the purchase of one hundred percent (100%) of the share capital of Energyeco S.r.l., a limited liability company organized under the laws of Italy (the “Cantu SPV”), which owns and operates a 0,990 Kw plant for the production of electricity from vegetal oil located in Cantù, Italy.

We agreed to pay an aggregate purchase price of €2,200,000 (USD $2,490,000) for the Cantu SPV (the “Cantu Purchase Price”), subject to an adjustment formula accounting for the Cantu SPV’s net financial position, net working capital, and certain net receivables, to be calculated on the basis of the Cantu SPV’s audited closing financial statement at the closing. The Cantu Purchase Price will be paid to Pronto Verde at the closing, less (a) an amount of €150,000 (USD $179,000) paid by us and presently held in escrow, which will be reimbursed should the closing not occur due to Seller’s breach or in the event that a condition precedent to closing does not materialize; (b) €1,010,280 (USD $1,145,000) to repay the balance of two loans payable by the Cantu SPV (the “Cantu Loans”); (c) a brokerage fee payable by Pronto Verde in the amount of €60,000 (USD $68,000); and (d) €100,000 (USD $113,000) to be held in escrow. The Cantu Purchase Price is subject to post-closing adjustment, if any, to be calculated on the basis of the Cantu SPV’s final closing financial statements, adjusted for the period between when the Cantu Purchase Price is calculated and date that the closing occurs, as audited.

The closing in relation to the Cantu SPV will be on or before September 27, 2017, and any such closing is subject to specified conditions precedent including, but not limited to, consummation of an acquisition of all share capital of the Cantu SPV by Pronto Verde from the owners of the Cantu SPV, delivery of audited closing financial statements of the Cantu SPV by Seller, and receipt of consent from the lenders and confirmation to accept repayment of the Cantu Loans.

Strategy

Our main focus is providing tailored solutions internationally to produce clean energy primarily out of the treatment of waste. We are focused on waste-to-energy projects in the United States, Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Israel and are in the process of developing a pipeline of similar projects. We believe there is a virtually endless supply of waste suitable for such projects and the demand for energy (particularly from such projects) is growing consistently.

Our model is to acquire or build, own and operate waste-to-energy facilities. We select projects with signed, long-term agreements with waste producers or waste haulers for feedstock, with national governments or electricity corporations for energy output and with private entities for the sale of other project by-products (such as renewable energy credits, heat and soil amendment). We are currently focused on several types of projects: (i) anaerobic digestion to electricity, (ii) landfill gas to energy, (iii) anaerobic digestion to gas, (iv) gasification, (v) incineration and (vi) energy crop to electricity.

Another component of the clean energy and waste-to-energy industry in the United States is renewable energy credits (“RECs”). A REC represents a MWh or KWh of clean energy. Many states, including North Carolina and Rhode Island, the sites of our two United States projects, require their utilities to prove that a portion of the energy they sell is produced from clean or renewable sources. A REC is used to demonstrate that the relevant unit of energy has a clean or renewable source. Consequently, utilities purchase RECs from producers of clean and renewable energy. Our agreements with Duke Energy and National Grid, for our North Carolina and Rhode Island projects, respectively, provide for “bundled” pricing for the sale of electricity and RECs.

We expect our projects to generate revenue through sales of thermal and electrical energy, energy efficiency technologies and RECs, and by-products, project development services, and tipping fees from accepting waste, as applicable to a particular project. On or about November 18, 2016, the Waste to Energy Anaerobic Digester 5.2 MW Plant in Charlotte, NC, of which we are a 25% owner, commenced commercial operations and started to provide its output to Duke Energy pursuant to the power purchase agreement with Duke Energy. On or about June 23, 2017, the Waste to Energy Anaerobic Digester 3.2 MW Plant in Johnston, RI, of which we are a 22.75% owner, commenced commercial operations and started to provide its output to National Grid pursuant to the power purchase agreement with National Grid. The commencement of the commercial operations includes the gradual intake of waste from the facility’s feedstock suppliers, increasing the parasitic load to the digesters, completing the waste-water-treatment resources and completing all other mechanical features needed for the facility to operate at full capacity. Both the North Carolina Facility and the Rhode Island Facility are in the mechanical completion and ramp-up phase of the project. We estimate that the North Carolina Facility will achieve mechanical completion by September 30, 2017, and that the Rhode Island Facility will achieve mechanical completion by October 30, 2017.

Our strategy is to integrate all activities and components that make up a waste-to-energy project and provide a turn-key, one-stop shop solution for waste-to-energy development. We are also actively seeking to acquire facilities that are in various stages of development. We work with and outsource key components of our projects to engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) providers and other project participants that provide the most economically viable solution for each individual project. The EPC providers may also be the provider of the technology used for each project. We believe this provides us the flexibility and freedom to tailor the best solution for each project. We expect that we will remain involved in managing and financing all aspects of our projects throughout their lifetimes or until they are sold. We believe this assures all of the involved parties, including waste producers, financing stakeholders, EPC and technology providers, and customers, that there is long-term continuity and responsibility for each project.

We aim to be distinctive and successful in the waste-to-energy market by: