REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
[X]
|
Pre-Effective Amendment No.
|
[ ]
|
Post-Effective Amendment No. 226
|
[X]
|
and/or
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
|
[X]
|
Amendment No. 228
|
[X]
|
SALVATORE FAIA
|
MICHAEL P. MALLOY, ESQUIRE
|
|
The RBB Fund, Inc.
|
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
|
|
615 East Michigan Street,
|
One Logan Square, Suite 2000
|
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-6996
|
[X]
|
immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
|
|
[ ]
|
on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b)
|
|
[ ]
|
60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
|
|
[ ]
|
On (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
|
|
[ ]
|
75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
|
|
[ ]
|
on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.
|
[ ]
|
This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.
|
SUMMARY SECTION — BOSTON PARTNERS EMERGING MARKETS FUND
|
2
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUND'S INVESTMENTS AND RISKS
|
9
|
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
|
13
|
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
|
16
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
26
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
28
|
For More Information:
|
Back
Cover
|
Institutional Class
|
||
Annual Fund Operating Expenses
(expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
|
||
Management fees
|
0.85
|
%
|
Distribution and servicing (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
0.49
|
%
|
Total annual Fund operating expenses
|
1.34
|
%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
(1)
|
0.24
|
%
|
Total annual Fund operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
1.10
|
%
|
(1) |
The Fund’s Adviser has contractually agreed to waive all or a portion of its advisory fee and/or reimburse expenses in an aggregate amount equal to the amount by which the Total annual Fund operating expenses (other than acquired fund fees and expenses, short sale dividend expenses, brokerage commissions, extraordinary items, interest or taxes) for the Fund’s Institutional Class shares exceeds 1.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to the Fund’s Institutional Class shares. Because acquired fund fees and expenses, short sale dividend expenses, brokerage commissions, extraordinary items, interest and taxes are excluded from the expense limitation, Total annual Fund operating expenses (after fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements) are expected to exceed 1.10%. This contractual limitation is in effect until September 1, 2018 and may not be terminated without the approval of the Board of Directors of The RBB Fund, Inc. If at any time the Fund’s Total annual Fund operating expenses (not including acquired fund fees and expenses, short sale dividend expenses, brokerage commissions, extraordinary items, interest or taxes) for a year are less than 1.10% or the expense cap then in effect, whatever is less, the Adviser is entitled to reimbursement by the Fund of the advisory fees forgone and other payments remitted by the Adviser to the Fund within three years from the date on which such waiver or reimbursement was made, provided such reimbursement does not cause the Fund to exceed expense limitations that were in effect at the time of the waiver or reimbursement.
|
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
|
Institutional Class
|
$ 1,121
|
$ 4,009
|
Purchase and Redemption By Mail:
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC P.O. Box 701 Milwaukee, WI 53201-0701 |
Purchase and Redemption By Wire:
Request routing instructions by calling the Fund’s transfer agent at 1-888-261-4073. |
Shareholders
|
Distribution
and
Shareholder
Services
|
Principal Underwriter
Quasar Distributors, LLC
777 East Wisconsin Avenue, Floor 6
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Facilitates the distribution of shares and provides administrative services to beneficial shareholders of each Fund.
|
Transfer Agent and Dividend Disbursing Agent
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services ,LLC
615 East Michigan Street*
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Handles shareholder services, including recordkeeping and statements, distribution of dividends and processing of buy, sell and exchange requests.
*Do not use this address for purchase and redemptions. Please see “Purchase of Fund Shares” and “Redemption of Fund Shares” sections for further instructions.
|
|
Asset
Management
|
Investment Adviser
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
909 Third Avenue, 32
nd
Floor
New York, NY 10022
Manages the Fund’s investment activities.
|
Custodian
U.S. Bank, N.A.
1555 North RiverCenter Drive
Milwaukee, WI 53212
Holds the Fund’s assets, settles all portfolio trades and collects income and maturity proceeds.
|
|
Fund
Operations
|
Administrator and Fund Accounting Agent
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Provides facilities, equipment and personnel to carry out administrative services related to the Fund and calculates the Fund’s net asset value, dividends and distributions.
|
Board of Directors
Supervises the Fund’s activities.
|
Regular Mail:
|
Overnight Mail:
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
|
c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services
|
c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services
|
P.O. Box 701
|
615 East Michigan Street
|
Milwaukee, WI 53201-0701
|
Milwaukee, WI 53202-5207
|
· |
Individual Retirement Plan, including Traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs
|
· |
Small Business Retirement Plans, including Simple IRAs and SEP IRAs
|
· |
Coverdell Education Savings Accounts
|
· |
If ownership is being changed on your account;
|
· |
When redemption proceeds are payable or sent to any person, address or bank account not on record;
|
· |
If a change of address was received by the Transfer Agent within the last 15 calendar days.
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS AND POLICIES
|
1
|
NON-PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT POLICIES AND RISKS
|
23
|
INVESTMENT LIMITATIONS
|
25
|
DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
|
33
|
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER
|
34
|
CODE OF ETHICS
|
44
|
PROXY VOTING
|
44
|
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
|
44
|
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES
|
49
|
DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS
|
58
|
FUND TRANSACTIONS
|
61
|
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION INFORMATION
|
63
|
OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING MAXIMUM SALES CHARGE,
|
64
|
PURCHASES AND REDEMPTIONS
|
64
|
TELEPHONE TRANSACTION PROCEDURES
|
64
|
VALUATION OF SHARES
|
65
|
TAXES
|
65
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING COMPANY SHARES
|
67
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
68
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
68
|
APPENDIX A
|
A-1
|
APPENDIX B
|
B-1
|
1. |
Borrow money or issue senior securities, except that the Fund may borrow from banks and enter into reverse repurchase agreements for temporary purposes in amounts up to one-third of the value of the Fund’s total assets at the time of such borrowing and provided that there is at least 300% asset coverage for the borrowings of the Fund. The Fund may not mortgage, pledge or hypothecate any assets, except in connection with any such borrowing and then in amounts not in excess of one-third of the value of the Fund’s total assets at the time of such borrowing. However, the amount shall not be in excess of lesser of the dollar amounts borrowed or 33 1/3% of the value of the Fund’s total assets at the time of such borrowing, provided that: (a) short sales and related borrowings of securities are not subject to this restriction; and (b) for the purposes of this restriction, collateral arrangements with respect to options, short sales, stock index, interest rate, currency or other futures, options on futures contracts, collateral arrangements with respect to initial and variation margin and collateral arrangements with respect to swaps and other derivatives are not deemed to be a pledge or other encumbrance of assets. Securities held in escrow or separate accounts in connection with the Fund’s investment practices are not considered to be borrowings or deemed to be pledged for purposes of this limitation;
|
2. |
Issue any senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act;
|
3. |
Act as an underwriter of securities within the meaning of the Securities Act, except insofar as it might be deemed to be an underwriter upon disposition of certain portfolio securities acquired within the limitation on purchases of restricted securities;
|
4. |
Purchase or sell real estate (including real estate limited partnership interests), provided that the Fund may invest: (a) in securities secured by real estate or interests therein or issued by companies that invest in real estate or interests therein; or (b) in real estate investment trusts;
|
5. |
Purchase or sell commodities or commodity contracts, except that the Fund may deal in forward foreign exchanges between currencies of the different countries in which it may invest and purchase and sell stock index and currency options, stock index futures, financial futures and currency futures contracts and related options on such futures;
|
6. |
Make loans, except through loans of portfolio securities and repurchase agreements, provided that for purposes of this restriction the acquisition of bonds, debentures or other debt instruments or interests therein and investment in government obligations, loan participations and assignments, short-term commercial paper, certificates of deposit and bankers’ acceptances shall not be deemed to be the making of a loan; or
|
7. |
Invest 25% or more of its total assets, taken at market value at the time of each investment, in the securities of one or more issuers in any particular industry (excluding the U.S. government and its agencies and instrumentalities).
|
1. |
Make investments for the purpose of exercising control or management, but investments by the Fund in wholly-owned investment entities created under the laws of certain countries will not be deemed the making of investments for the purpose of exercising control or management; or
|
2. |
Purchase securities on margin, except that the Fund may use margin to the extent necessary to engage in short sales and may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of portfolio transactions; and provided that margin deposits in connection with options, futures contracts, options on futures contracts, transactions in currencies or other derivative instruments shall not constitute purchasing securities on margin.
|
3. |
Hold illiquid securities in an amount exceeding, in the aggregate, 15% of the Fund’s net assets.
|
Information Posting
|
Frequency of Disclosure
|
Date of Web Posting
|
||
Complete Portfolio Holdings
|
Monthly/Quarterly
|
15 days after the end of each calendar month for the Fund
|
||
Top 10 Portfolio Holdings and other portfolio characteristics
|
Monthly/Quarterly
|
10 days after the end of each calendar month for the Fund
|
Name, Address, and Age
|
Position(s)
Held with
Company
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
1
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by Director*
|
Other
Directorships
Held by Director
in the Past 5 Years
|
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
|
|||||
Julian A. Brodsky
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 84 |
Director
|
1988 to present
|
From 1969 to 2011, Director and Vice Chairman, Comcast Corporation (cable television and communications).
|
29
|
AMDOCS Limited (service provider to telecommunications companies).
|
J. Richard Carnall
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202
Age: 78
|
Director
|
2002 to present
|
Since 1984, Director of Haydon Bolts, Inc. (bolt manufacturer) and Parkway Real Estate Company (subsidiary of Haydon Bolts, Inc.); since 2004, Director of Cornerstone Bank.
|
29
|
None
|
Gregory P. Chandler
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 50 |
Director
|
2012 to present
|
Since 2009, Chief Financial Officer, Emtec, Inc. (information technology consulting/services); from 2003 to 2009, Managing Director, head of Business Services and IT Services Practice, Janney Montgomery Scott LLC (investment banking/brokerage).
|
29
|
Emtec, Inc.; FS Investment Corporation (business development company); FS Energy and Power Fund (business development company).
|
Name, Address, and Age
|
Position(s)
Held with
Company
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
1
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by Director*
|
Other
Directorships
Held by Director
in the Past 5 Years
|
Nicholas A. Giordano
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 74 |
Director
|
2006 to present
|
Since 1997, Consultant, financial services organizations.
|
29
|
Kalmar Pooled Investment Trust (registered investment company); Wilmington Funds (registered investment company); WT Mutual Fund (registered investment company) (until March 2012); Independence Blue Cross; Intricon Corp. (producer of medical devices).
|
Sam Lambroza
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Age: 63
|
Director
|
2016 to present
|
Since 2010, Managing Director, Chief Investment Officer and Board Member, Tinsel Group of Companies (asset management).
|
29
|
None
|
Arnold M. Reichman
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 69 |
Chairman
Director
|
2005 to present
1991 to present
|
Since 2006, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Lifebooker, LLC (online beauty and health appointment booking service).
|
29
|
Independent Trustee of EIP Investment Trust (registered investment company).
|
Robert A. Straniere
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 76 |
Director
|
2006 to present
|
Since 2009, Administrative Law Judge, New York City; since 1980, Founding Partner, Straniere Law Group (law firm).
|
29
|
Reich and Tang Group (asset management).
|
INTERESTED DIRECTOR
2
|
|||||
Robert Sablowsky
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 79 |
Vice Chairman
Director
|
2016 to present
1991 to present
|
Since 2002, Senior Director - Investments and prior thereto, Executive Vice President, of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (a registered broker-dealer).
|
28
|
None
|
Name, Address, and Age
|
Position(s)
Held with
Company
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
1
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by Director*
|
Other
Directorships
Held by Director
in the Past 5 Years
|
OFFICERS
|
|||||
Salvatore Faia, JD,
CPA, CFE Vigilant Compliance, LLC Gateway Corporate Center Suite 216 223 Wilmington West Chester Pike Chadds Ford, PA 19317 Age: 54 |
President
Chief Compliance Officer
|
2009 to present
2004 to present
|
Since 2004, President, Vigilant Compliance, LLC (investment management services company); since 2005, Independent Trustee of EIP Investment Trust (registered investment company).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
James G. Shaw
615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 Age: 56 |
Treasurer
and
Secretary
|
2016 to present
|
Since 2016, Treasurer and Secretary of The RBB Fund, Inc.; from 1995 to 2016, Senior Director and Vice President of BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. (financial services company).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Robert Amweg
Vigilant Compliance, LLC
Gateway Corporate Center Suite 216
223 Wilmington West Chester Pike Chadds Ford, PA 19317 Age: 63 |
Assistant
Treasurer
|
2016 to present
|
Since 2013, Compliance Director, Vigilant Compliance, LLC (investment management services company); since 2012, Consultant to the financial services industry; from 2007 to 2012, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, Turner Investments, LP (registered investment company).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Jesse Schmitting
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Age: 34
|
Assistant Treasurer
|
2016 to present
|
Since 2008, Assistant Vice President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (fund administrative services firm).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Name, Address, and Age
|
Position(s)
Held with
Company
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
1
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by Director
|
Other
Directorships
Held by Director
in the Past 5 Years
|
Edward Paz
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Age: 46
|
Assistant Secretary
|
2016 to present
|
Since 2007, Vice President and Counsel, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (fund administrative services firm).
|
N/A
|
|
Michael P. Malloy
One Logan Square Ste. 2000 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Age: 58 |
Assistant
Secretary |
1999 to present
|
Since 1993, Partner, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP (law firm).
|
N/A
|
*
|
Each Director oversees twenty-nine portfolios of the Company that are currently offered for sale.
|
1.
|
Subject to the Company’s Retirement Policy, each Director may continue to serve as a Director until the last day of the calendar year in which the applicable Director attains age 75 or until his successor is elected and qualified or his death, resignation or removal. The Board reserves the right to waive the requirements of the Policy with respect to an individual Director. The Board has approved waivers of the policy with respect to Messrs. Brodsky, Carnall, Sablowsky and Straniere. Each officer holds office at the pleasure of the Board until the next special meeting of the Company or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she dies, resigns or is removed.
|
2.
|
Mr. Sablowsky is considered an “interested person” of the Company as that term is defined in the 1940 Act and is referred to as an “Interested Director.” Mr. Sablowsky is considered an “Interested Director” of the Company by virtue of his position as an employee of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., a registered broker-dealer.
|
Name of Director
|
Dollar Range of Equity
Securities in the Fund*
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of
Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Director within the Family of Investment Companies |
Independent Directors
|
||
Julian A. Brodsky
|
None
|
Over $100,000
|
J. Richard Carnall
|
None
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Gregory P. Chandler
|
None
|
$1-$10,000
|
Nicholas A. Giordano
|
None
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Sam Lambroza
|
None
|
Over $100,000
|
Arnold M. Reichman
|
None
|
Over $100,000
|
Robert A. Straniere
|
None
|
$1-$10,000
|
Interested Director
|
||
Robert Sablowsky
|
None
|
Over $100,000
|
* |
The Fund has not commenced operations as of the date of this SAI.
|
Name of Director/Officer
|
Aggregate
Compensation from the Fund* |
Pension or
Retirement Benefits Accrued |
Estimated
Annual Benefits
Upon
Retirement |
Total
Compensation From Fund Complex Paid to
Directors
or Officer |
Independent Directors:
|
||||
Julian A. Brodsky, Director
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$106,250
|
J. Richard Carnall, Director
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$108,250
|
Gregory P. Chandler, Director
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$123,125
|
Nicholas A. Giordano, Director
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$113,750
|
Sam Lambroza, Director**
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$46,000
|
Arnold M. Reichman, Director and Chairman
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$136,875
|
Robert A. Straniere, Director
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$102,250
|
Interested Director:
|
None
|
|||
Robert Sablowsky, Director
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$125,625
|
Officer:
|
None
|
|||
James G. Shaw, Treasurer and Secretary
|
None
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$20,000
|
* |
The Fund had not commenced operations as of the date of this SAI.
|
** |
Mr. Lambroza joined the Board effective April 1, 2016.
|
● |
Individual Contribution:
a subjective evaluation of the professional’s individual contribution based on the individual’s goals and objectives established at the beginning of each year;
|
● |
Product Investment Performance:
the performance of the investment product(s) with which the individual is involved versus the pre-designed index based on the excess return and the level of risk, or tracking error, of the product;
|
● |
Investment Team Performance:
the financial results of the Portfolio Manager’s investment group; and
|
● |
Firm-Wide Performance:
the overall financial performance of the firm.
|
Name of Portfolio
Manager or Team Member |
Type of Accounts
|
Total # of
Accounts Managed |
Total
Assets ($mm) |
# of Accounts
Managed that Advisory Fee Based on Performance |
Total Assets that
Advisory Fee Based on Performance ($mm) |
||||||||
Joseph F. Feeney, Jr.
|
Other Registered Investment Company
|
1
|
$
|
728 million
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
2
|
$
|
2.0 billion
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Accounts
|
22
|
$
|
1.3 billion
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
|||||||
Paul Korngiebel
|
Other Registered Investment Company
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Accounts
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
• |
Amortization schedule - the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note; and
|
• |
Source of payment - the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note.
|
I.
|
The Board of Directors
|
1
|
A.
|
Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections
|
1
|
B.
|
Majority Voting for Director Elections (U.S. and Canada)
|
5
|
C.
|
Chairman and CEO are the Same Person
|
5
|
D.
|
Majority of Independent Directors
|
5
|
E.
|
Stock Ownership Requirements
|
5
|
F.
|
Options Backdating
|
5
|
G.
|
Lack of nominating committee
|
6
|
H.
|
Term of Office
|
6
|
I.
|
Requiring two or more nominees
|
6
|
J.
|
Age Limits
|
6
|
K.
|
Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection
|
6
|
L.
|
Succession Planning
|
6
|
M.
|
Limits for directors receiving 25% Withhold Votes
|
6
|
N.
|
Establish/Amend Nominee Qualifications
|
6
|
O.
|
Director Elections – Non-U.S. Companies
|
7
|
II.
|
Proxy Contests
|
21
|
A.
|
Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections
|
21
|
B.
|
Reimburse Proxy Solicitation Expenses
|
21
|
III.
|
Auditors
|
21
|
A.
|
Ratifying Auditors
|
21
|
B.
|
Italy - Director and Auditor Indemnification
|
22
|
C.
|
Austria, Greece, Portugal and Spain:
|
22
|
D.
|
MSCI EAFE Companies - Auditor Fee Disclosure
|
22
|
IV.
|
Proxy Contest Defenses
|
23
|
A.
|
Board Structure: Staggered vs. Annual Elections
|
23
|
B.
|
Shareholder Ability to Remove Directors
|
23
|
C.
|
Cumulative Voting
|
23
|
D.
|
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings
|
23
|
E.
|
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent
|
23
|
F.
|
Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board
|
24
|
V.
|
Tender Offer Defenses
|
24
|
A.
|
Poison Pills
|
24
|
B.
|
Poison Pills (Japan)
|
25
|
C.
|
Anti-Takeover Proposals (France)
|
25
|
G.
|
Changing Corporate Name
|
50
|
H.
|
Special Purpose Acquisition Corporations (SPACs)
|
50
|
XI.
|
Mutual Funds
|
51
|
XII.
|
Corporate Governance and Conduct
|
51
|
• |
Disclosed outreach efforts by the board to shareholders in the wake of the vote;
|
• |
Rationale provided in the proxy statement for the level of implementation;
|
• |
The subject matter of the proposal;
|
• |
The level of support for and opposition to the resolution in past meetings;
|
• |
Actions taken by the board in response to the majority vote and its engagement with shareholders;
|
• |
The continuation of the underlying issue as a voting item on the ballot (as either shareholder or management proposals); and
|
• |
Other factors as appropriate.;
|
a. |
The board's rationale for adopting the bylaw/charter amendment without shareholder ratification;
|
b. |
Disclosure by the company of any significant engagement with shareholders regarding the amendment;
|
c. |
The level of impairment of shareholders' rights caused by the board's unilateral amendment to the bylaws/charter;
|
d. |
The board's track record with regard to unilateral board action on bylaw/charter amendments or other entrenchment provisions;
|
e. |
The company's ownership structure;
|
f. |
The company's existing governance provisions;
|
g. |
Whether the amendment was made prior to or in connection with the company's initial public offering;
|
h. |
The timing of the board's amendment to the bylaws/charter in connection with a significant business development;
|
i. |
Other factors, as deemed appropriate, that may be relevant to determine the impact of the amendment on shareholders.
|
j. |
Unless the adverse amendment is reversed or submitted to a binding shareholder vote, in subsequent years vote case-by-case on director nominees. Generally vote against (except new nominees, who should be considered case-by-case) if the directors:
|
•
|
Classified the board;
|
•
|
Adopted supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter; or
|
• |
Eliminated shareholders' ability to amend bylaws.
|
k. |
For newly public companies, generally vote against or withhold from directors individually, committee members, or the entire board (except new nominees, who should be considered case-by-case) if, prior to or in connection with the company's public offering, the company or its board adopts bylaw or charter provisions adverse to shareholders' rights, considering the following factors:
|
• |
The level of impairment of shareholders' rights caused by the provision;
|
• |
The company’s or the board's rationale for adopting thcontested
|
• |
e provision;
|
• |
The provision's impact on the ability to change the governance structure in the future (e.g., limitations on shareholder right to amend the bylaws or charter, or supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter);
|
• |
The ability of shareholders to hold directors accountable through annual director elections, or whether the company has a classified board structure; and,
|
• |
Any reasonable sunset provision; and
|
• |
other relevant factors.
|
9. |
Insufficient Executive Compensation Disclosure by Externally Managed Issuers (EMI’s)
|
a. |
The scope of the proposal;
|
b. |
The company's current board leadership structure;
|
c. |
The company's governance structure and practices;
|
d. |
Company performance; and
|
e. |
Any other relevant factors that may be applicable.
|
a. |
Individually elected directors;
|
b. |
The number of related directors should not exceed the proportion of the common shares controlled by the controlling shareholder, to a maximum of two-thirds, however if the CEO is related to the controlling shareholder, then at least two-thirds of the directors should be independent of management;
|
c. |
If the CEO and chair roles are combined or the CEO is or is related to the controlling shareholder, then there should be an independent lead director
and
the board should have an effective and transparent process to deal with any conflicts of interest between the company, minority shareholders, and the controlling shareholder; and
|
d. |
A majority of the audit and nominating committees should be either independent directors or related directors who are independent of management. All members of the compensation committee should be independent of management, and, if the CEO is related to the controlling shareholder, no more than one member of the compensation committee should be a related director;
|
e. |
Prompt disclosure of detailed vote results following each shareholder meeting; and
|
f. |
Adoption of a majority vote standard with a director resignation policy for uncontested elections OR a public commitment to adopt a majority voting standard with a director resignation policy for uncontested elections if the controlling shareholder ceases to control 50 percent or more of the common shares.
|
a. |
Nominating committee has process to receive and discuss suggestions from shareholders for potential director nominees; and
|
b. |
If the CEO is related to the controlling shareholder, the board's process to evaluate the performance, leadership, compensation, and succession of management should be led by independent directors.
|
a. |
We will vote AGAINST compensation committee members if the company has poor pay practices as defined above.
|
b. |
We will generally vote AGAINST the entire slate if individual director elections are not permitted and the company demonstrates poor pay practices as defined above.
|
c. |
We will generally vote AGAINST equity plans if plan is used as a vehicle for poor pay practices as defined above.
|
i. |
For all markets (except Greece or Portugal), vote against the election or reelection of any non-independent directors (excluding the CEO) if:
|
ii. |
Fewer than 50 percent of the board members elected by shareholders excluding where relevant, employee shareholder representatives, would be independent, or
|
iii. |
Fewer than one-third of board members, including those who, in accordance with local law(s) requiring their mandatory board membership, are not elected by shareholders, would be independent.
|
iv. |
In Italy, at least half of the board should be independent (50 percent). Issuers with a controlling shareholder will be required to have a board consisting of at least one-third independent members (33 percent). This applies to individual director appointments (co-options). In the case of complete board renewals that are regulated by the Italian slate system (“voto di lista”), board independence will be one of the factors for determining which list of nominees BP considers best suited to add value for shareholders based, as applicable, on BP European policies.
|
v. |
For companies incorporated in Portugal or Greece, at least one-third of the board will be required to be independent. BP will recommend a vote against the entire slate of candidates (in the case of bundled elections), or a vote against the election of any non-independent directors (in the case of unbundled elections) if board independence level does not meet the minimum recommended one-third threshold.
|
1 |
Widely held companies are interpreted as:
|
›
|
Generally, based on their membership in a major index and/or the number of ISS clients holding the securities;
|
›
|
For Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Luxembourg: based on local blue chip market index and/or MSCI EAFE companies;
|
›
|
For Portugal, based on their membership in the PSI-20 and/or MSCI-EAFE index.
|
i. |
Generally vote against the election or reelection of any non-independent directors (excluding the CEO) if the level of independence on the board will be lower than minority shareholders' percentage of equity ownership, or, in any case, if the board will be less than one-third independent (whichever is higher).
|
ii. |
Minority shareholders' ownership percentage is calculated by subtracting the majority shareholder's equity ownership percentage from 100 percent. Majority control is defined in terms of economic interest and not voting rights, and is considered to be any shareholder or group of shareholders acting collectively that control at least 50 percent + 1 share of the company's equity capital. This independence threshold is applied to controlled widely held companies or main index-listed/MSCI-EAFE member companies which would otherwise fall under a 50-percent independence guideline as described in the Board Independence Policy.
|
a. |
However, in markets where the local corporate governance code addresses board independence at controlled companies, BP will generally recommend against the election or reelection of any non-independent directors (excluding the CEO) if the level of independence on the board is lower than the local code recommendation, but in any case, if the level of board independence will be less than one-third.
|
• |
The nominee is an executive director serving on the audit, remuneration, and/or nomination committee;
|
• |
The nominee is a non-independent director serving as the chairman of the audit committee, remuneration committee, and/or nomination committee.
|
• |
The nominee is an executive director;
|
• |
The nominee is a non-independent chairman of the board
|
c. |
Had attended less than 75 percent of board meeting over the most recent two years, without a satisfactory explanation (Acceptable explanations include Medical issues; family emergencies, the director has served for less than one year; missing one meeting of a total of three or fewer.);
|
d. |
Is an executive director serving on the remuneration committee or nomination committee, and the committee is not majority independent; or
|
e. |
Is an executive director serving on the audit committee.
|
f. |
Classified by the company as independent but fails to meet the BP criteria for independence. Classify a director as non-independent where the director has served on the board for more than nine years, and where the board either fails to provide any reason for considering the director to still be independent, or where the stated reasons raise concerns among investors as to the director’s true level of independence.
|
a. |
The nominee has been a partner of the company's auditor within the last three years, and serves on the audit committee;
|
b. |
The nominee has attended less than 75 percent of board and key committee meetings over the most recent fiscal year, without a satisfactory explanation. The calculation of director attendance will not include meetings attended by alternate directors. Acceptable reasons for director absences are generally limited to the following:
|
c. |
Medical issues/illness;
|
d. |
Family emergencies;
|
e. |
The director has served on the board for less than a year; and
|
f. |
Missing only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer);
|
g. |
The nominee is an executive director serving on the remuneration committee or nomination committee, and the committee is not majority independent;
|
h. |
The nominee is an executive director serving on the audit committee;
|
i. |
The nominee sits on a total of more than five public company boards (BP will accept a commitment by an overboarded director to step down from one or more boards at the next annual meeting of the company or companies in question, if that will bring the total number of boards to no more than five); or
|
j. |
Any non-independent director nominees where the board is less than one-third independent under BP classification of directors.
|
a. |
The non-audit fees paid to the auditor exceed audit fees without satisfactory explanation; or
|
b. |
The company did not disclose the audit fees and /or non-audit fees in the latest fiscal year.
|
c. |
Vote AGAINST director nominees who sit on a total of more than six public company boards.
|
• |
Any nominee who is a non-independent director serving on the audit committee.
|
• |
Any non-independent director nominees (5 year cooling off period) where the board is less than majority-independent (in the case of large companies) or less than 25 percent independent (in the case of small companies
|
• |
A director has engaged in some significant transactions with the company in the last three years and he/she cannot reasonably be seen to have the necessary objectivity and independence
|
• |
It is excessive relative to peer companies, or
|
• |
The company has not provided a reasonable justification, or
|
• |
There are serious concerns about the statutory reports presented or audit procedures used.
|
d. |
Vote against the bundled election of directors of companies listed under the differentiated corporate governance segments of the Sao Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBovespa)--Novo Mercado, Nivel 2, and Nivel 1-- if the company maintains or proposes a combined chairman/CEO structure, after three (3) years from the date the company's shares began trading on the respective differentiated corporate governance segment.
|
e. |
Vote against the election of the company's chairman, if the nominee is also the company's CEO, when it is presented as a separate election at companies listed under the differentiated corporate governance segments of the Sao Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBovespa)–Novo Mercado, Nivel 2, and Nivel 1-- after three (3) years from the date the company's shares began trading on the respective differentiated corporate governance segment
.
|
f. |
Under extraordinary circumstances, vote against individual directors, member(s) of a committee, or the entire board, due to:
|
• |
Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
|
• |
Failure to replace management as appropriate; or
|
• |
Egregious actions related to a director's service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.
|
1. |
At companies with a statutory auditory structure: vote for the election of directors, except:
|
› |
Top executive(s)
1
at a company that has underperformed in terms of capital efficiency (i.e., when the company has posted average return on equity (ROE) of less than 5 percent over the last five fiscal years)
2
, unless an improvement
3
is observed;
|
› |
Top executive(s) if the board, after the shareholder meeting, will not include at least two outside directors;
|
› |
Top executive(s) at a company that has a controlling shareholder, where the board, after the shareholder meeting, will not include at least two independent directors based on ISS independence criteria for Japan;
|
› |
An outside director nominee who attended less than 75 percent of board meetings during the year under review
2
; or,
|
› |
Top executive(s) who are responsible for not implementing a shareholder proposal which has received a majority
5
of votes cast, or not putting a similar proposal on the ballot as a management proposal the following year (with a management recommendation of for), when that proposal is deemed to be in the interest of independent shareholders.
|
• |
An outside director nominee is regarded as non-independent based on ISS independence criteria for Japan, and the board, after the shareholder meeting, will not be majority independent; or
|
• |
Where the company has a controlling shareholder, a director nominee sits on the nomination committee and is an insider, or non-independent outsider, when the board, after the shareholder meeting, will not include at least two independent directors based on ISS independence criteria for Japan.
|
2 |
The attendance of inside directors is not disclosed in Japan. For companies with a three committee structure and companies with an audit committee structure, ISS will require attendance of 75 percent or more of audit committee meetings as well as 75 percent or more of board meetings.
|
3. |
At companies with a board with audit committee structure:
(In addition to the guidelines for companies with a statutory auditor structure) vote for the election of directors, except where:
|
• |
Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
|
• |
Failure to replace management as appropriate; or
|
• |
Egregious actions related to a director's service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company
|
a. |
Adequate disclosure has not been provided in a timely manner;
|
a. |
There are serious concerns about the accounts presented, the audit procedures used, or some other feature for which the audit committee has responsibility
|
36. |
Greece:
|
37. |
Hungary:
|
38. |
China
|
a. |
The nominee has been a partner of the company's auditor within the last three years, and serves on the audit committee;
|
b. |
The independent director nominee has attended less than 75 percent of board meetings over the most recent fiscal year
3
, without a satisfactory explanation. Acceptable reasons for director absences are generally limited to the following:
|
c. |
Medical issues/illness;
|
d. |
Family emergencies;
|
e. |
The director has served on the board for less than a year; and
|
f. |
Missing only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer);
|
g. |
Any non-independent director nominees where the board is less than one-third independent under ISS classification of directors.
|
a. |
Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
|
3 |
Companies are required to disclose the attendance record of independent directors only, and committee memberships and attendance are generally not disclosed.
|
b. |
Failure to replace management as appropriate; or
|
c. |
Egregious actions related to a director's service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.
|
39. |
South Korea
|
a. |
Adequate disclosure has not been provided in a timely manner;
|
b. |
An outside director sits on more than two public company boards, in violation of the Commercial Act and accompanying presidential decree;
|
c. |
An outside director has attended less than 75 percent of board meetings
4
over the most recent fiscal year, without a satisfactory explanation. Acceptable reasons for director absences are generally limited to the following:
|
d. |
Medical issues/illness;
|
e. |
Family emergencies;
|
f. |
The director has served on the board for less than a year; and
|
g. |
Missing only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer);
|
h. |
For large companies, any non-independent director nominees (under ISS classification) where the board is less than majority-independent
.
|
a. |
Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
|
b. |
Failure to replace management as appropriate; or
|
c. |
Egregious actions related to a director's service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his/her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.
|
40. |
EMEA (Middle East and Africa except South Africa)
|
• |
Candidates who can be identified as representatives of minority shareholders of the company, or independent candidates
|
• |
Candidates who bring needed professional skills, profiles and relevant experience.
|
41. |
Tax Havens
|
4 |
Korean law requires companies to disclose the attendance of only outside directors.
|
A. |
Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections
|
1. |
Long-term financial performance of the target company relative to its industry;
|
2. |
Management's track record;
|
3. |
Background to the contested election;
|
4. |
Qualifications of director nominees (both slates) and compensatory arrangements;
|
5. |
Likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be met; and
|
6. |
Stock ownership positions.
|
A. |
Ratifying Auditors
|
1. |
Proposals to ratify auditors are made on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST the ratification of auditors and audit committee members when the company’s non-audit fees (“other”) are excessive. In circumstances where “other” fees are related to initial public offerings, bankruptcy emergence, and spin-offs, and the company makes public disclosure of the amount and nature of those fees which are determined to be an exception to the standard “non-audit fee” category, then such fees may be excluded from the non-audit fees considered in determining the ratio of non-audit to audit/audit-related fees/tax compliance and preparation for purposes of determining whether non-audit fees are excessive.
Audit Fees = statutory audit fees + audit related fees + permissible tax services (this excludes tax strategy) Non-Audit Fees = other fees (ex. consulting) The formula used to determine if the non-audit fees are excessive is as follows: Non-audit (“other”) fees > (audit fees + audit-related fees + tax compliance/preparation fees) |
3. |
We vote AGAINST the ratification of auditors if there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion which is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position.
|
4. |
(Europe) We vote AGAINST if external auditors have previously served the company in an executive capacity or are considered affiliated; if the name of the auditor is unpublished; if there is an unexplained change of auditor; for companies on the MSCI EAFE, fees for non-audit service exceed 100% of standard fees or any stricter limit set by law. For widely-held companies, fees for non-audit services exceed either 100 percent of standard audit-related fees or any stricter limit set in local best practice recommendations or law
|
5. |
We WITHHOLD votes from audit committee members when the company’s non-audit fees (ex. consulting) are greater than 50% of total fees paid to the auditor. We may take action against members of an audit committee in situations where there is persuasive evidence that the audit committee entered into an inappropriate indemnification agreement with its auditor that limits the ability of the company, or its shareholders, to pursue legitimate legal recourse against the audit firm.
|
6. |
We WITHHOLD votes from audit committee members when auditor ratification is not included on the proxy ballot.
|
B. |
Italy - Director and Auditor Indemnification
|
1. |
Votes are made on a CASE-BY-CASE basis to indemnify directors and officers, and we vote AGAINST proposals to indemnify external auditors.
|
2. |
We vote FOR the indemnification of internal auditors, unless the costs associated with the approval are not disclosed.
|
C. |
Austria, Greece, Portugal and Spain:
|
1. |
There are serious concerns about the procedures used by the auditor;
|
2. |
There is reason to believe that the auditor has rendered an opinion, which is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position;
|
3. |
External auditors have previously served the company in an executive capacity or can otherwise be considered affiliated with the company;
|
4. |
Name of the proposed auditors has not been published;
|
5. |
The auditors are being changed without explanation; or
|
6. |
Fees for non-audit services exceed standard annual audit-related fees.
|
D. |
Hong Kong, Singapore
|
1. |
Vote FOR proposals to (re)appoint auditors and authorize the board to fix their remuneration, unless:
|
a. |
There are serious concerns about the accounts presented or the audit procedures used;
|
b. |
The auditor is being changed without explanation; or
|
c. |
The non-audit fees exceed the audit fees paid to the external auditor in the latest fiscal year without satisfactory explanation.
|
E. |
MSCI EAFE Companies - Auditor Fee Disclosure
|
1. |
We vote FOR auditor ratification and/or approval of auditors’ fees, unless: Auditors’ fees for the previous fiscal year are not disclosed and broken down into at least audit and non-audit fees.
|
2. |
The fees must be disclosed in a publicly available source, such as the annual report or company Web site. If approval of auditors’ fees and auditor ratification are two separate voting items, a vote recommendation of AGAINST would apply only to the fees, not to the auditor ratification.
|
A. |
Board Structure: Staggered vs. Annual Elections
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST proposals to classify the board.
|
2. |
We vote FOR proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors annually.
|
B. |
Shareholder Ability to Remove Directors
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST proposals that provide that directors may be removed only for cause.
|
2. |
We vote FOR proposals to restore shareholder ability to remove directors with or without cause.
|
3. |
We vote AGAINST proposals that provide that only continuing directors may elect replacements to fill board vacancies.
|
4. |
We vote FOR proposals that permit shareholders to elect directors to fill board vacancies.
|
C. |
Cumulative Voting
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST proposals to eliminate cumulative voting.
|
2. |
We generally vote FOR proposals to restore or permit cumulative voting unless there are compelling reasons to recommend AGAINST the proposal, such as:
|
a. |
the presence of a majority threshold voting standard with a carve-out for plurality in situations where there are more nominees than seats, and a director resignation policy to address failed elections;
|
b. |
a proxy access provision in the company’s bylaws, or a similar structure that allows shareholders to nominate directors to the company’s ballot
|
3. |
We vote FOR proposals for cumulative voting at controlled companies (insider voting power > 50%).
|
D. |
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to call special meetings.
|
2. |
We vote FOR proposals that remove restrictions on the right of shareholders to act independently of management.
|
E. |
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent
|
F. |
Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board
|
1. |
We vote FOR proposals that seek to fix the size of the board.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the board without shareholder approval.
|
3. |
We vote AGAINST proposals seeking to amend the company’s board size to fewer than five seats or more than fifteen seats.
|
A. |
Poison Pills
|
1. |
We generally vote FOR shareholder proposals that ask a company to submit its poison pill for shareholder ratification unless:
|
a. |
A shareholder-approved poison pill is in place.
|
b. |
The company has adopted a policy specifying that the board will only adopt a shareholder rights plan if either:
|
i. |
Shareholders have approved the adoption of the plan, or
|
ii. |
The board determines that it is in the best interest of shareholders to adopt a pill without the delay of seeking shareholder approval, in which the pill will be put to a vote within 12 months of adoption or it will expire.
|
2. |
We vote FOR shareholder proposals to redeem a company's poison pill.
|
3. |
We vote AGAINST management proposals to ratify a poison pill.
|
4. |
We will vote on a CASE-BY-CASE basis on proposals to adopt a poison pill or protective amendment to preserve a company’s net operating losses based on the following criteria:
|
a. |
The trigger (NOL pills generally have a trigger slightly below 5 percent);
|
b. |
The value of the NOLs;
|
c. |
The term;
|
d. |
Shareholder protection mechanisms (sunset provision, causing expiration of the pill upon exhaustion or expiration of NOLs); and other factors that may be applicable.
|
5 |
"Unfettered" means no restrictions on agenda items, no restrictions on the number of shareholders who can group together to reach the 10 percent threshold, and only reasonable limits on when a meeting can be called: no greater than 30 days after the last annual meeting and no greater than 90 prior to the next annual meeting.
|
e. |
The company’s existing governance structure including: board independence, existing takeover defenses, track record of responsiveness to shareholders, and any other problematic governance concerns; and
|
f. |
Any other factors that may be applicable.
|
B. |
Poison Pills Canada
|
C. |
Poison Pills (Japan)
|
• |
Independent directors who meet ISS guidelines on attendance comprise at least 1/3 of the board after the shareholder meeting;
|
• |
The number of independent directors who meet ISS guidelines on attendance is at least two after the shareholder meeting;
|
• |
The directors are subject to annual elections;
|
• |
The bid evaluation committee is composed entirely of independent directors, or independent statutory auditors, who meet ISS guidelines on attendance;
|
• |
The trigger threshold is set at no less than 20 percent of shares outstanding;
|
• |
The duration of the poison pill does not exceed three years;
|
• |
There are no other protective or entrenchment tools that can serve as takeover defenses, including blocking stakes held by management-friendly shareholders, or setting the maximum board size to the actual board size to eliminate vacant seats, or tightening of procedures for removing a director from office; and
|
D. |
The company posts its proxy circular on the stock exchange website at least four weeks prior to the meeting, to give shareholders sufficient time to study the details of the proposal and question management about them. Anti-Takeover Proposals (France)
|
E. |
Fair Price Provisions
|
1. |
We vote proposals to adopt fair price provisions on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, evaluating factors such as the vote required to approve the proposed acquisition, the vote required to repeal the fair price provision, and the mechanism for determining the fair price.
|
2. |
We vote FOR shareholder proposals to lower the shareholder vote requirement in existing fair price provisions.
|
F. |
Greenmail
|
1. |
We vote FOR proposals to adopt anti-greenmail charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise restrict a company's ability to make greenmail payments.
|
2. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis anti-greenmail proposal when they are bundled with other charter or bylaw amendments.
|
G. |
Pale Greenmail
|
H. |
Unequal Voting Rights
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST dual class exchange offers.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST dual class recapitalizations.
|
I. |
Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement to Amend the Charter or Bylaws
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments.
|
2. |
We vote FOR shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for charter and bylaw amendments. However for companies with shareholder(s) who have significant ownership levels, we vote on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, taking into account the following criteria:
|
a. |
Ownership structure;
|
b. |
Quorum requirements; and
|
c. |
Supermajority vote requirements.
|
J. |
Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement to Approve Mergers
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve mergers and other significant business combinations.
|
2. |
We vote FOR shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for mergers and other significant business combinations.
|
K. |
White Squire Placements
|
L. |
Protective Preference Shares
|
1. |
The supervisory board needs to approve an issuance of shares while the supervisory board is independent within the meaning of RMG’S categorization rules and the Dutch Corporate Governance Code.
|
2. |
No call/put option agreement exists between the company and the foundation.
|
3. |
There is a qualifying offer clause or there are annual management and supervisory board elections.
|
4. |
The issuance authority is for a maximum of 18 months.
|
5. |
The board of the company-friendly foundation is independent.
|
6. |
The company has disclosed under what circumstances it expects to make use of the possibility to issue preference shares.
|
7. |
There are no priority shares or other egregious protective or entrenchment tools.
|
8. |
The company releases its proxy circular, with details of the poison pill proposal, at least three weeks prior to the meeting.
|
9. |
Art 2:359c Civil Code of the legislative proposal has been implemented.
|
A. |
Confidential Voting
|
1. |
We vote FOR shareholder proposals that request corporations to adopt confidential voting, to use independent tabulators, and to use independent inspectors of election as long as the proposals include clauses for proxy contests as follows: In the case of a contested election, management should be permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents do not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.
|
2. |
We vote FOR management proposals to adopt confidential voting.
|
3. |
WE vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals regarding proxy voting mechanics, taking into consideration whether implementation of the proposal is likely to enhance or protect shareholder rights. Issues include confidential voting of individual proxies and ballots, confidentiality of running vote tallies, treatment of abstentions and/or broker non-votes in counting methodology. Factors considered are transparency, consistency, fairness. Other factors include:
|
a. |
The scope and structure of the proposal
|
b. |
the company’s stated confidential voting policy and whether it ensures a ‘level playing field’ by providing shareholder proponents with equal access to vote information prior to the annual meeting;
|
c. |
The company’s vote standard for management and shareholder proposals and whether it ensures consistency and fairness in the process and maintains the integrity of vote results;
|
d. |
Whether the company’s disclosure regarding its vote counting method and other relevant voting policies with respect to management and shareholder proposals are consistent and clear;
|
e. |
Any recent controversies or concerns related to the company’s proxy voting mechanic;
|
f. |
Any unintended consequences resulting from implementation of the proposal; and
|
g. |
any other relevant factors.
|
B. |
Litigation Rights(including exclusive venue and fee-shifting bylaw provisions)
|
A. |
Equal Access
|
1. |
Company-specific factors; and
|
2. |
Proposal-specific factors, including:
|
a. |
The ownership thresholds proposed in the resolution (i.e. percentage and duration);
|
b. |
The maximum proportion of directors that shareholders may nominate each year; and
|
c. |
The method of determining which nominations should appear on the ballot if multiple shareholders submit nominations. .
|
B. |
Bundled Proposals
|
C. |
Shareholder Advisory Committees
|
D. |
Charitable Contributions
|
E. |
Adjourn Meeting Requests to Solicit Additional Proxies to Approve Merger Agreement
|
1. |
We support the underlying merger proposal
|
2. |
The company provides a compelling reason and
|
3. |
The authority is limited to adjournment proposals requesting the authority to adjourn solely to solicit proxies to approve a transaction that we support.
|
F. |
Related-Party Transactions (France)
|
1. |
We evaluate these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis taking into consideration the individuals concerned in the agreement, detailed content of the agreement, and convened remuneration.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST if the report is not available 21 days prior to the meeting date, or if the report contains an agreement between a non-executive director and the company for the provision of consulting services.
|
3. |
We vote FOR if the report is not available 21 days prior to the meeting date, but the resolution states that there are none.
|
G. |
Related Party Transaction Auditor Reports (France)
|
H. |
Related Party Transactions (Malaysia)
|
• |
A director who is classified by the company as independent has a vested interest in the business transaction AND
|
• |
The value of the transaction exceeds MYR 250,000. In addition, directors involved in related party transaction in excess of MYR 250,000 will be classified as non-independent.
|
I. |
General Share Issuance Mandate (Malaysia)
|
J. |
Financial Assistance Authorities (South Africa)
|
• |
As part of the authority, the company requests a general authority to provide financial assistance to directors, and this is not limited to participation in share incentive schemes; and/or
|
• |
As part of the authority, the company seeks approval to provide financial assistance “to any person.”
|
K. |
Authority to Reduce Minimum Notice Period for Calling a Meeting (non-US Companies)
|
J. |
Independent Proxy (Switzerland)
|
K. |
E
xclusive Venue Proposals (Mgmt proposals seeking exclusive jurisdiction for resolution of disputes)
|
1. |
Whether the company has been materially harmed by shareholder litigation outside its jurisdiction of incorporation, based on disclosure in the company’s proxy statement; and
|
2. |
whether the company has the following good governance features:
|
a. |
an annually elected board;
|
b. |
a majority vote standard in uncontested director elections; and
|
c. |
the absence of a poison pill, unless the pill was approved by shareholders.
|
A. |
Common Stock Authorization
|
1. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issue.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of the class of stock that has superior voting rights in companies that have dual-class capitalization structures.
|
3. |
We vote AGAINST proposals which request increases in the number of authorized shares over a level 50 % above currently authorized shares, after taking into account any stock split or financing activity, without specific reasons.
|
B. |
Capital Issuance Requests
|
1. |
General issuance requests under both authorized and conditional capital systems allow companies to issue shares to raise funds for general financing purposes. Issuances can be carried out with or without preemptive rights. Corporate law in many countries recognizes preemptive rights and requires shareholder approval for the disapplication of such rights.
|
a. |
We vote FOR general issuance requests with preemptive rights for up to 50% of a company’s outstanding capital.
|
b. |
We vote FOR general issuance requests without preemptive rights for up to 10% of a company’s outstanding capital.
|
c. |
We vote AGAINST global company issuances without preemptive rights over 10% of a company’s outstanding capital. (In Ireland and UK - pre-emption rights should not exceed more than 5 percent of the issued share capital in any one year, with an overall limit of 7.5 percent in any rolling three-year period.)
|
2. |
Specific issuance
requests will be judged on their individual merits.
|
3. |
Protective Preference Shares (Netherlands)
Management proposals to approve protective preference shares to company-friendly foundations: We will evaluate these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis and will only support resolutions if: |
a. |
The supervisory board needs to approve an issuance of shares while the supervisory board is independent within the meaning of RMG’S categorization rules and the Dutch Corporate Governance Code.
|
b. |
No call/put option agreement exists between the company and the foundation.
|
c. |
There is a qualifying offer clause or there are annual management and supervisory board elections.
|
d. |
The issuance authority is for a maximum of 18 months.
|
e. |
The board of the company-friendly foundation is independent.
|
f. |
The company has disclosed under what circumstances it expects to make use of the possibility to issue preference shares.
|
g. |
There are no priority shares or other egregious protective or entrenchment tools.
|
h. |
The company releases its proxy circular, with details of the poison pill proposal, at least three weeks prior to the meeting.
|
i. |
Art 2:359c Civil Code of the legislative proposal has been implemented.
|
4. |
U.K and Netherlands
|
5. |
South Africa
|
a. |
We will vote FOR a general Authority to place authorized but unissued shares under the control of the directors unless:
|
i. |
The authority is over a number of shares equivalent to more than 10% of the current issued share capital.
|
ii. |
The authority would allow shares to be used for share incentive scheme purposes and the underlying scheme(s) raises concerns.
|
iii. |
The company used the authority during the previous year in a manner deemed not to be in shareholders’ best interests.
|
b. |
We will vote FOR a general authority to issue shares for cash unless:
|
i. |
The authority is over a number of shares equivalent to more than 10% of the current issued share capital.
|
ii. |
The company used the authority during the previous year in a manner deemed not to be in shareholder’s interest.
|
6. |
Singapore
|
7. |
Taiwan
|
8. |
France
|
C. |
Stock Distributions: Splits and Dividends
|
D. |
Reverse Stock Splits
|
1. |
We vote FOR management proposals to implement a reverse stock split when the number of shares will be proportionately reduced to avoid delisting.
|
2. |
We vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to implement a reverse stock split that do not proportionately reduce the number of shares authorized for issue.
|
E. |
Preferred Stock
|
1. |
We vote AGAINST proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend distribution, and other rights (“blank check” preferred stock).
|
2. |
We vote FOR proposals to create blank check preferred stock in cases when the company expressly states that the stock will not be used as a takeover defense.
|
3. |
We vote FOR proposals to authorize preferred stock in cases where the company specifies that the voting, dividend, conversion, and other rights of such stock and the terms of the preferred stock appear reasonable.
|
4. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE BASIS proposals to increase the number of blank check preferred shares after analyzing the number of preferred shares available for issue given a company’s industry and performance in terms of shareholder returns.
|
F. |
Adjustments to Par Value of Common Stock
|
G. |
Preemptive Rights
|
1. |
We vote FOR proposals to create preemptive rights.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST proposals to eliminate preemptive rights.
|
H. |
Debt Restructurings
|
1. |
Dilution: How much will ownership interest of existing shareholders be reduced, and how extreme will dilution to any future earnings be?
|
2. |
Change in Control: Will the transaction result in a change in control of the company?
|
3. |
Bankruptcy: Generally, we approve proposals that facilitate debt restructurings unless there are clear signs of self-dealing or other abuses.
|
I. |
Share Repurchase Programs
|
1. |
We will generally vote FOR market repurchase authorities/share repurchase programs provided that the proposal meets the following parameters:
|
a. |
Maximum volume: 10 percent for market repurchase within any single authority (Carve out: 15 percent in the U.K.) and 10 percent of outstanding shares to be kept in treasury (“on the shelf”);
|
b. |
Duration does not exceed 18 months. For company’s who operate in markets that do not specify a maximum duration or durations last beyond 18 months. We will assess their historic practices.
|
2. |
Vote AGAINST proposals where:
|
a. |
The repurchase can be used for takeover defenses;
|
b. |
There is clear evidence of abuse;
|
c. |
There is no safeguard against selective buybacks;
|
d. |
Pricing provisions and safeguards are deemed to be unreasonable in light of market practice.
|
3. |
Consider Case-by-Case if these conditions are met:
|
a. |
The overall balance of the proposed plan seems to be clearly in shareholders’ interests;
|
b. |
The plan still respects the 10 percent maximum of shares to be kept in treasury.
|
J. |
Share Repurchase Programs to Fund Stock Option Plans
|
1. |
Spain
|
2. |
Portugal
|
K. |
Additional Share Repurchase Programs
|
1. |
Denmark
|
2. |
Japan
|
• |
Balance sheet conditions;
|
• |
Capital efficiency and return on equity;
|
• |
Past share buybacks and dividend payouts;
|
• |
Board composition;
|
• |
Shareholding structure; and
|
• |
Other relevant factors
|
3. |
Germany and Italy
|
a. |
Authorization is limited to 18 months
|
b. |
The number of shares that would be purchased with call options and/or sold with put options is limited to a max of 5% of TSO
|
c. |
An experienced financial institution is responsible for the trading
|
d. |
The company has a clean track record regarding repurchases.
|
L. |
Netherlands - Remuneration Report
|
1. |
The supervisory board needs to approve an issuance of shares whilst the supervisory board is independent within the meaning of RMG’s categorization rules and the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (i.e. a maximum of one member can be non-independent);
|
2. |
No call / put option agreement exists between the company and a foundation for the issuance of PPS;
|
3. |
The issuance authority is for a maximum of 18 months;
|
4. |
The board of the company friendly foundation is fully independent;
|
5. |
There are no priority shares or other egregious protective or entrenchment tools;
|
6. |
The company states specifically that the issue of PPS is not meant to block a takeover, but will only be used to investigate alternative bids or to negotiate a better deal;
|
7. |
The foundation buying the PPS does not have as a statutory goal to block a takeover;
|
8. |
The PPS will be outstanding for a period of maximum 6 months (an EGM must be called to determine the continued use of such shares after this period)
|
M. |
Tracking Stock
|
1. |
Adverse governance charges
|
2. |
Excessive increases in authorized capital stock
|
3. |
Unfair method of distribution
|
4. |
Diminution of voting rights
|
5. |
Adverse conversion features
|
6. |
Negative impact on stock option plans
|
7. |
Other alternatives such as spinoff
|
N. |
“Going Dark” Transactions
|
1. |
Whether the company has attained benefits from being publicly traded.
|
2. |
Cash-out value
|
3. |
Balanced interests of continuing vs. cashed-out shareholders
|
4. |
Market reaction to public announcement of transaction
|
A. |
General
|
1. |
Votes with respect to compensation plans are determined on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.
|
a. |
Plan Cost – the total estimated cost of the plans relative to industry/market cap peers measured by the company’s estimated Shareholder Value Transfer and considering both the SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grans, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants and SVT based only on new shares plus shares remaining for future grans.
|
b. |
Plan Features – Automatic single-triggered award vesting upon change of control; Discretionary vesting authority, liberal share recycling. Minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan.
|
c. |
Grant Practices: The burn rate; vesting requirements; the estimated duration of the plan, the proportion of the CEO’s most recent equity grants, existence of a claw-back policy, post exercise/vesting requirements.
|
a. |
The plan creates dilution exceeding 3 ½% per year over the life of the plan.
|
b. |
Awards may vest in connection with a liberal change of control definition.
|
c. |
The plan would permit reprising or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval.
|
i. |
Generally vote against an equity compensation plan proposal where:
|
• |
The non-employee director aggregate share reserve under the plan exceeds the BP established maximum limit of 1 percent of the outstanding common shares; or
|
• |
The equity plan document does not specify an
annual individual
non-employee director grant limit with a maximum value of (i) $100,000 worth of stock options in the case of a stock option or omnibus plan, or (ii) $150,000 worth of shares in the case of an equity plan that does not grant stock options.
|
ii. |
Generally vote against individual equity grants to non-employee directors in the following circumstances:
|
• |
In conjunction with an equity compensation plan that is on the agenda at the shareholder meeting if voting against the underlying equity compensation plan; and
|
• |
Outside of an equity compensation plan if the director’s annual grant would exceed the above individual director limit.
|
iii. |
Shares taken in lieu of cash fees and a one-time initial equity grant upon a director joining the board will not be included in the maximum award limit.
|
b. |
Hong Kong and Singapore specific
|
i. |
Vote AGAINST a stock option scheme if directors eligible to receive options under the scheme if directors eligible to receive options under the scheme are involved in the administration of the scheme the scheme administrator has the discretion over awards; this generally excludes equity awards granted or taken in lieu of cash fees.
|
c. |
Singapore specific:
|
i. |
Vote against a performance share plan or restricted share plan if:
|
• |
The maximum dilution level for the plan exceeds BP guidelines of 5% of issued capital for a mature company and 10% if the plan includes other positive features such as challenging performance criteria and meaningful vesting periods as these features partially offsheet dilution concerns by reducing the likelihood that awards will become exercisable unless there is a clear improvement in shareholder value; or
|
• |
Directors eligible to receive options under the scheme are involved in the administration of the scheme and the administrator has the discretion over awards.
|
d. |
France-specific: BP will generally vote FOR equity-based compensation proposals taking into account the following factors:
|
i. |
The volume of awards transferred to participants must not be excessive; the potential volume of fully diluted issued share capital from equity-based compensation plans must not exceed the following guidelines:
|
o |
The shares reserved for all share plans may not exceed 5% of a company’s issued share capital, except in the case of a high-growth company or particularly well-designed plan, in which case dilution of between 5 and 10% is allowed.
|
ii. |
The plan must be sufficiently long-term in nature/structure; minimum vesting of 3 years or more; and
|
iii. |
The awards must be granted at market price.
|
B. |
Management Proposals Seeking Approval to Reprice Options
|
C. |
Director Compensation
|
D. |
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
|
1. |
We vote on
qualified
employee stock purchase plans on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.
|
2. |
We vote on
non-qualified
employee stock purchase plans on a CASE-BY-CASE basis but will APPROVE plans considering the following criteria:
|
a. |
Broad-based participation (all employees excluding individuals with 5% or more of beneficial ownership)
|
b. |
Limits on employee contribution, either fixed dollar or percentage of salary
|
c. |
Company matching contribution up to 25%
|
d. |
No discount on the stock price on the date of purchase since there is a company matching contribution
|
3. |
Canada
|
a. |
Reasonable limit on employee contribution (may be expressed as a fixed dollar amount or a percentage of base salary excluding bonus, commissions and special compensation);
|
b. |
Employer contribution of up to 25% of employee contribution and no purchase price discount or employer contribution of more than 25% of employee contribution and SVT cost of the company’s equity plans is within the allowable cap for the company;
|
c. |
Purchase price is at least 80% of fair market value with no employer contribution;
|
d. |
Potential dilution together with all other equity-based plans is 10% of outstanding common shares for less; and
|
e. |
Plan Amendment Provision requires shareholder approval for amendments to:
|
i. |
The number of shares reserved for the plan;
|
ii. |
The allowable purchase price discount;
|
iii. |
The employer matching contribution amount.
|
a. |
Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) cost of the plan;
|
b. |
Eligibility;
|
c. |
Administration;
|
d. |
The company’s other equity-based compensation plans and benefit programs, in particular pensions.
|
E. |
OBRA-Related Compensation Proposals:
|
1. |
Amendments that Place a Cap on Annual Grants or Amend Administrative Features
|
2. |
Amendments to Added Performance-Based Goals
|
a. |
We vote FOR amendments to add performance goals to existing compensation plans to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.
|
b. |
We vote FOR plans that support full disclosure and linking compensation to performance goals that impact the long-term performance of the firm (e.g. compliance with environmental/EPA regulations, labor supplier standards or EEOC laws).
|
3. |
Amendments to Increase Shares and Retain Tax Deductions under OBRA
|
4. |
Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans
|
a. |
We vote on cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans to exempt the compensation from taxes under the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.
|
b. |
We generally vote AGAINST plans with excessive awards ($2 million cap).
|
5. |
Independent Outsiders
|
F. |
Shareholder Proposals to Limit Executive and Director Pay
|
1. |
We generally vote FOR shareholder proposals that seek additional disclosure of executive and director pay information.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST all other shareholder proposals that seek to limit executive and director pay.
|
G. |
Golden and Tin Parachutes
|
1. |
We vote FOR shareholder proposals to require golden and tin parachutes to be submitted for shareholder ratification.
|
2. |
We vote AGAINST golden parachutes.
|
3. |
Voting on a CASE-BY-CASE basis on Golden Parachute proposals, including consideration of existing change in control arrangements maintained with named executive officers rather than focusing primarily on new or extended arrangements.
|
a. |
Features that may result in an AGAINST recommendation include one or more of the following, depending on the number, magnitude, and/or timing of issues(s):
|
b. |
Single or modified single trigger cash severance;
|
c. |
Single trigger acceleration of unvested equity awards;
|
d. |
Excessive cash severance (>3x base salary and bonus);
|
e. |
Excise tax gross ups triggered and payable (as opposed to a provision to provide excise tax gross ups);
|
f. |
Excessive golden parachute payments (on an absolute basis or as percentage of transaction equity value); or
|
g. |
Recent amendments that incorporate any problematic features (such as those above) or recent actions (such as extraordinary equity grants) that may make packages so attractive as to influence merger agreements that may not be in the best interests of shareholders; or
|
h. |
The company’s assertion that a proposed transaction is conditions on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote.
|
H. |
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
|
I. |
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans
|
J. |
Pension Plan Income and Performance-Based Compensation
|
K. |
Indexed Options and Performance Vested Restricted Stock
|
L. |
Burn Rate
|
M. |
Transferable Stock Options
|
1. |
We will generally vote FOR TSO awards within a new equity plan if the total cost of the company’s equity plans is less than the company’s allowable cap, assuming all other conditions have been met to receive a FOR recommendation. The TSO structure must be disclosed and amendments to existing plans should make clear that only options granted post-amendment shall be transferable.
|
2. |
One-time transfers will be evaluated on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, giving consideration to the following:
|
a. |
Executive officers and non-employee directors should be excluded from participating.
|
b. |
Stock options must be purchased by third-party financial institutions at a discount to their fair value using an appropriate financial model.
|
N. |
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERPs)
|
O. |
Pay-for-Superior-Performance
|
P. |
Executive Compensation Advisory Proposal (Say on Pay)
|
1. |
BP will vote FOR annual advisory votes on compensation, which provide the most consistent and clear communication channel for shareholder concerns about companies’ executive pay programs.
|
2. |
We evaluate shareholder proposals to ratify the compensation of the company’s named executive officers (NEOs) on an annual basis on a CASE-BY-CASE basis considering the following global principles:
|
a. |
Maintain appropriate pay-for-performance alignment with emphasis on long-term shareholder value: This principle encompasses overall executive pay practices, which must be designed to attract, retain, and appropriately motivate the key employees who drive shareholder value creation over the long term. It will take into consideration, among other factors: the linkage between pay and performance; the mix between fixed and variable pay; performance goals; and equity-based plan costs;
|
b. |
Avoid arrangements that risk “pay for failure.” This principle addresses the use and appropriateness of long or indefinite contracts, excessive severance packages, and guaranteed compensation;
|
c. |
Maintain an independent and effective compensation committee: This principle promotes oversight of executive pay programs by directors with appropriate skills, knowledge, experience, and a sound process for compensation decision-making (e.g., including access to independent expertise and advice when needed);
|
d. |
Provide shareholders with clear, comprehensive compensation disclosures: This principle underscores the importance of informative and timely disclosures that enable shareholders to evaluate executive pay practices fully and fairly;
|
e. |
Avoid inappropriate pay to non-executive directors: This principle recognizes the interests of shareholders in ensuring that compensation to outside directors does not compromise their independence and ability to make appropriate judgments in overseeing managers’ pay and performance. At the market level, it may incorporate a variety of generally accepted best practices.
|
f. |
Evaluation of performance metrics in short-term and long-term plans, as discussed and explained in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis. Consider the measures, goal, and target awards reported by the company for executives’ short and long-term incentive awards; disclosure, explanation of their alignment with the company’s business strategy, and whether goals appear to be sufficiently challenging in relation to resulting payouts;
|
g. |
Evaluation of peer group benchmarking used to set target pay or award opportunities. Consider the rationale stated by the company for constituents in its pay benchmarking peer group, as well as the benchmark targets it uses to set or validate executives’ pay to ascertain whether the benchmarking process is sound or may result in pay “ratcheting” due to inappropriate peer group constituents or targeting; and
|
h. |
Balance of performance based versus non-performance based pay. Consider the ratio of performance based (not including plain vanilla stock options) vs. non-performance based pay elements reported for the CEO latest reported fiscal year compensation especially in conjunction with concerns about other factors such as performance metrics/goals, benchmarking practices, and pay-for-performance disconnects.
|
3. |
BP will vote AGAINST management say on pay proposals, AGAINST/WITHHOLD on compensation committee members (or, for rare cases, where the full board is deemed responsible, all directors including the CEO,) and/or AGAINST an equity-based incentive plan proposal if: :
|
a. |
There is a misalignment between CEO pay and company;
|
b. |
The company maintains problematic pay practices;
|
c. |
The board exhibits poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders
|
• |
Poor disclosure practices, including: insufficient disclosure to explain the pay setting process for the CEO and how CEO pay is linked to company performance and shareholder return; lack of disclosure of performance metrics and their impact on incentive payouts; no disclosure of rationale related to the use of board discretion when compensation is increased or performance criteria or metrics are changed resulting in greater amounts paid than that supported by previously established goals.
|
• |
Board's responsiveness to investor input and engagement on compensation issues, including:
|
o |
Failure to respond to majority-supported shareholder proposals on executive pay topics;
|
o |
Failure to respond to majority-opposed previous say-on-pay proposal; and
|
o |
Failure to respond to the company's previous say-on-pay proposal that received support of less than 70 percent of votes cast taking into account the ownership structure of the company.
|
• |
The size and scope of the management services agreement;
|
• |
Executive compensation in comparison to issuer peers and/or similarly structured issuers;
|
• |
Overall performance;
|
• |
Board and committee independence;
|
• |
Conflicts of interest and process for managing conflicts effectively;
|
• |
Disclosure and independence of the decision-making process involved in the selection of the management services provider
;
|
• |
Risk mitigating factors included within the management services agreement such as fee recoupment mechanisms
;
|
• |
Executives' responsibilities; and
|
• |
Other factors that may reasonably be deemed appropriate to assess an externally-managed issuer's governance framework.
|
Q. |
Pre-Arranged Trading Plans (10b5-1 Plans)
|
1. |
Adoption, amendment, or termination of a 10b5-1 Plan must be disclosed within two business days in a Form 8-K
|
2. |
Amendment or early termination of a 10b5-1 Plan is allowed only under extraordinary circumstances, as determined by the board
|
3. |
Ninety days must elapse between adoption or amendment of a 10b5-1 Plan and initial trading under the plan
|
4. |
Reports on Form 4 must identify transactions made pursuant to a 10b5-1 Plan. An executive may not trade in company stock outside the 10b5-1 Plan.
|
5. |
Trades under a 10b5-1 Plan must be handled by a broker who does not handle other securities transactions for the executive
|
R. |
Share Buyback Holding Periods
|
1. |
A repurchase limit of up to 10% of outstanding issued share capital (15% in UK/Ireland);
|
2. |
A holding limit of up to 10% of issued share capital in treasury; and
|
3. |
A duration of no more than 5 years, or such lower threshold as may be set by applicable law, regulation or code of governance best practice.
|
4. |
A holding limit of up to 10% of a company’s issued share capital in treasury; and
|
5. |
A duration of no more than 18 months.
|
6. |
A holding limit of up to 10% of a company’s issued share capital in treasure; and
|
7. |
A duration of no more than 18 months.
|
8. |
The repurchase can be used for takeover defenses;
|
9. |
There is clear evidence of abuse;
|
10. |
There is no safeguard against selective buybacks; and/or
|
11. |
Pricing provisions and safeguards are deemed to be unreasonable in light of market practice.
|
S. |
Tax Gross-Up Proposals
|
T. |
Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred from Candidate Nomination Proposal
|
U. |
Equity Based Compensation Plans are evaluated on a case-by-case basis
|
1. |
The total cost of the company’s equity plans is unreasonable;
|
2. |
The plan expressly permits the repricing of stock options/stock appreciate rights (SARs) without prior shareholder approval;
|
3. |
The CEO is a participant in the proposed equity-based compensation plan and there is a disconnect between CEO pay and the company’s performance where over 50 percent of the year-over-year increase is attributed to equity awards;
|
4. |
The company’s three year burn rate exceeds the greater of 2% and the mean plus one standard deviation of its industry group;
|
5. |
The plan provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur (e.g., upon shareholder approval of a transaction or the announcement of a tender offer); or
|
6. |
The plan is a vehicle for poor pay practices;
|
7. |
The company has a liberal definition of change-in-control.
|
› |
Plan Cost
: The total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers, measured by the company's estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) in relation to peers and considering both:
|
› |
SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and
|
› |
SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants.
|
› |
Plan Features:
|
› |
Absence of problematic change-in-control (CIC) provisions, including:
|
› |
Single-trigger acceleration of award vesting in connection with a CIC; and
|
› |
Settlement of performance-based equity at target or above in the event of a CIC-related acceleration of vesting regardless of performance.
|
› |
No financial assistance to plan participants for the exercise or settlement of awards;
|
› |
Public disclosure of the full text of the plan document; and
|
› |
Reasonable share dilution from equity plans relative to market best practices.
|
› |
Grant Practices:
|
› |
Reasonable three-year average burn rate relative to market best practices;
|
› |
Meaningful time vesting requirements for the CEO's most recent equity grants (three-year lookback);
|
› |
The issuance of performance-based equity to the CEO;
|
› |
A clawback provision applicable to equity awards; and
|
› |
Post-exercise or post-settlement share-holding requirements (S&P/TSX Composite Index only).
|
6 |
In cases where certain historic grant data are unavailable (e.g. following an IPO or emergence from bankruptcy), Special Cases models will be applied which omit factors requiring these data.
|
› |
Discretionary or insufficiently limited non-employee director participation;
|
› |
An amendment provision which fails to adequately restrict the company's ability to amend the plan without shareholder approval;
|
› |
A history of repricing stock options without shareholder approval (three-year look-back);
|
› |
The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a significant pay-for-performance disconnect under certain circumstances; or
|
V. |
Golden Coffin (Death Benefit)
|
W. |
Hold Till (post) Retirement
|
1. |
Whether the company has any holding period, retention ratio, or officer ownership requirements in place. These should consist of:
|
a. |
Rigorous stock ownership guidelines, or
|
b. |
A holding period requirement coupled with a significant long-term ownership requirement, or
|
c. |
A meaningful retention ratio,
|
2. |
Actual officer stock ownership and the degree to which it meets or exceeds the proponent’s suggested holding period/retention ratio or the company’s own stock ownership or retention requirements.
|
3. |
Problematic pay practices, current and past, which may promote a short-term versus a long-term focus.
|
X. |
Acceptance of Deposites (India)
|
Y. |
Termination of Employment Prior to Severance Payment and Eliminating Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Equity:
|
1. |
The company’s current treatment of equity in change-of-control situations (i.e. is it double triggered, does it allow for the assumption of equity by acquiring company, the treatment of performance shares.
|
2. |
Current employment agreements, including potential poor pay practices such as gross-ups embedded in those agreements.
|
Z. |
Compensation Issue in Non-US Companies
|
1. |
Europe: Vote case-by-case on management proposals seeking ratification of a company's executive compensation
‐
related items, and generally vote against a company's compensation
‐
related proposal if such proposal fails to comply with one or a combination of several of the global principles and their corresponding rules:
|
• |
There shall be a clear link between the company's performance and variable awards.
|
• |
There shall not be significant discrepancies between the company's performance and real executive payouts.
|
• |
The level of pay for the CEO and members of executive management should not be excessive relative to peers, company performance, and market practices.
|
• |
Significant pay increases shall be explained by a detailed and compelling disclosure.
|
• |
Severance pay agreements must not be in excess of (i) 24 months' pay or of (ii) any more restrictive provision pursuant to local legal requirements and/or market best practices.
|
• |
Arrangements with a company executive regarding pensions and post
‐
mandate exercise of equity-based awards must not result in an adverse impact on shareholders' interests or be misaligned with good market practices.
|
2. |
We generally vote FOR proposals to award cash fees to non-executive directors and will vote AGAINST where proposals provide for the egregious granting of stock options, performance based equity comp and performance based cash to non-executive directors.
|
3. |
Europe – Generally vote for proposals to fix the ratio between the fixed and variable components of remuneration unless:
|
• |
Adequate disclosure has not been provided in a timely manner
|
• |
There are concerns about the company’s motivation for change
|
• |
There are specific concerns with the company.
|
• |
Has adequate disclosure been provided to allow investors to make an informed voting decision;
|
• |
The level of pay for the CEO and other executive directors should not be excessive relative to peers, company performance, and market practices;
|
• |
Significant pay increases should be explained by a detailed and compelling disclosure;
|
• |
Severance pay agreements should not be in excess of 12 months' fixed remuneration and should be in line with best practice;
|
• |
There should be a clear link between the company's performance and variable awards;
|
• |
The ability for discretionary exceptional awards to be made in excess of the standard policy will require a maximum award level to be disclosed. Open ended exceptional award levels will not be supported;
|
• |
Executives should own a significant personal shareholding in the company and this should be supported by established share ownership guidelines by the company;
|
• |
The remuneration committee should have the ability to clawback or withhold payment of incentive awards when justified.
|
• |
NEDs generally should not receive performance based remuneration
|
• |
Generally vote FOR fixed fees to external auditors unless the fees for non-audit services routinely exceed standard audit-related fees.
|
4. |
Finland - Stock Options
|
a. |
We vote AGAINST these proposals; however, an exception will be made if a company proposes to reduce the strike price by the amount of future special dividends only.
|
b. |
We vote FOR proposals that provide proportionate adjustments to outstanding awards as a result of a special cash dividend or any other future distribution of assets other than a normal cash dividend.
|
5. |
Germany - Remuneration Disclosure
|
6. |
Sweden - Remuneration Report
|
a. |
The potential dilution from equity-based compensation plans exceeds RMG guidelines.
|
b. |
Restricted stock plans and matching share plans do not include sufficiently challenging performance criteria and vesting periods.
|
c. |
The remuneration report was not made available to shareholders in a timely manner.
|
d. |
Other concerns exist with respect to the disclosure or structure of the bonus or other aspects of the remuneration policy.
|
7. |
Sweden, Norway - Matching Share Plans
|
a. |
For every matching share plan, RMG will require a holding period.
|
b. |
For plans without performance criteria, the shares must be purchased at market price.
|
c. |
For broad-based plans directed at all employees, BP accepts a 1:1 arrangement - that no more than one free share will be awarded for every share purchased at market value. . ..
|
d. |
For plans directed at executives, we require that sufficiently challenging performance criteria are attached to the plan. Higher discounts demand proportionally higher performance criteria.
|
e. |
The dilution of the plan when combined with the dilution from any other proposed or outstanding employee stock matching plans must comply with BP guidelines.
|
8. |
Australia
|
9. |
Japan
|
10. |
Nordic Markets
|
a. |
Adjusting the strike price for future ordinary dividends AND including expected dividend yield above zero percent when determining the number of options awarded under the plan;
|
b. |
Having significantly higher expected dividends than actual historical dividends;
|
c. |
Favorably adjusting the terms of existing options plans without valid reason;
|
d. |
Any other provisions or performance measures that result in undue award.
|
11. |
Italy
|
a. |
The shares reserved for all share plans may not exceed 5 percent of a company's issued share capital, except in the case of high-growth companies or particularly well-designed plans, in which case we allow dilution of between 5 and 10 percent: in this case, we will need to have performance conditions attached to the plans which should be acceptable regarding the RMG criteria (“challenging criteria”);
|
b. |
The options for management are granted without a discount;
|
c. |
An executive director is part of the remuneration committee; or
|
d. |
The company has no remuneration committee and has executive members within the board.
|
*
|
BP may apply a carve-out in the case of well designed plans.*
|
12. |
Taiwan
|
13. |
China
|
a. |
The grant price of the restricted shares is less than 50% of the average price of the company’s shares during the 20 trading days prior to the pricing reference date;
|
b. |
The maximum dilution level for the scheme exceeds BP guidelines of 5% of issued capital for a mature company and 10% for a growth company. BP will support plans at mature companies with dilution levels up to 10% if the plan includes other positive features such as challenging performance criteria and meaningful vesting periods.
|
c. |
Directors eligible to receive restricted shares under the scheme are involved in the administration of the scheme; or
|
d. |
The company fails to set challenging performance hurdles for unlocking the restricted shares compared with its historical financial performance or the industry benchmarks.
|
14. |
South Korea
|
a. |
The proposed cap on directors' remuneration is excessive relative to peer companies' remuneration without reasonable justification; or
|
b. |
The company is asking for an increase in the remuneration cap where the company has not provided a reasonable justification for the proposed increase.
|
15. |
China
|
• |
The total stock allocated to the ESPP exceeds 10 percent of the company's total shares outstanding at any given time;
|
• |
The share purchase price is less than 90 percent of the market price
7
when the share purchase is conducted solely through private placement;
|
• |
The company's significant shareholders (i.e. individuals with 5 percent or more of beneficial ownership of the company) are involved as plan participants;
|
• |
The ESPP is proposed in connection with an equity financing scheme which does not warrant shareholder support; or
|
• |
The ESPP contains any other terms that are deemed disadvantageous to shareholders
|
16. |
Japan - Director Stock Options
|
AA. |
Canadian Equity Compensation Plans, TSX Issuers
|
1. |
Change-in-Control Provisions
|
2. |
Generally vote AGAINST proposals to reprice outstanding options including adjustments that can be reasonably considered repricing such as: reduction in exercise price or purchase price, extension of term for outstanding options, cancellation and reissuance of options, substitution of options with other awards.
|
3. |
Amendment Procedures
|
7 |
Calculated as the average trading price 20 trading days prior to the announcement, pursuant to the CSRC's guidelines on private placements.
|
a. |
Any increase in the number (or percentage in the case of rolling plans) of shares reserved;
|
b. |
Any amendment that extends the term of an award beyond the original expiry;
|
c. |
Amendments to eligible participants that may permit the introduction or reintroduction of non-employee directors on a discretionary basis;
|
d. |
Any amendment which would permit equity based awards granted under the Plan may be transferable or assignable other than for normal estate settlement purposes
|
4. |
Employee Share Purchase Plans, Amendment procedures
|
a. |
Limit on employee contribution (expressed as a percentage of base salary excluding bonus, commissions and special compensation);
|
b. |
Purchase price is at least 80 percent of fair market value with no employer contribution; OR
|
c. |
No discount purchase price with maximum employer contribution of up to 20% of employee contribution
|
d. |
Offering period is 27 months or less; and
|
e. |
Potential dilution together with all other equity-based plans is ten percent of outstanding common shares or less.
|
A. |
Voting on State Takeover Statutes
|
B. |
Voting on Reincorporation Proposals
|
1. |
Canada
|
a. |
BP will generally vote FOR proposals to amend or replace articles of incorporation or bylaws if:
|
b. |
BP will generally vote AGAINST new by-laws or amended by-laws that would establish two different quorum levels which would result in implementing a higher quorum solely for those shareholder meetings where common share investors seek to replace the majority of current board members. (“Enhanced Quorum”).
|
c. |
BP will generally vote FOR proposals to adopt or amend articles/bylaws unless the resulting document contains any of the following:
|
• |
The quorum for a meeting of shareholders is set below two persons holding 25 percent of the eligible vote (this may be reduced in the case of a small company where it clearly has difficulty achieving quorum at a higher level, but we oppose any quorum below 10 percent);
|
• |
The quorum for a meeting of directors is less than 50 percent of the number of directors;
|
• |
The chair of the board has a casting vote in the event of a deadlock at a meeting of directors;
|
• |
An alternate director provision that permits a director to appoint another person to serve as an alternate director to attend board or committee meetings in place of the duly elected director; and
|
• |
The proposed articles/bylaws raise other corporate governance concerns, such as granting blanket authority to the board with regard to capital authorizations or alteration of capital structure without shareholder approval
|
A. |
Mergers and Acquisitions
|
1. |
Anticipated financial and operating benefits;
|
2. |
Offer price (cost vs. premium);
|
3. |
Prospects of the combined companies;
|
4. |
How the deal was negotiated;
|
5. |
Changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights;
|
6. |
Change-in-control payments to executive officers and possible conflicts of interest; and
|
7. |
Potential legal or environmental liability risks associated with the target firm
|
B. |
Corporate Restructuring
|
C. |
Spin-offs
|
D. |
Asset Sales
|
E. |
Liquidations
|
F. |
Appraisal Rights
|
G. |
Changing Corporate Name
|
H. |
Special Purpose Acquisition Corporations (SPACs)
|
1. |
Valuation, Market reaction,
|
2. |
Deal timing,
|
3. |
Negotiations and process,
|
4. |
Conflicts of interest,
|
5. |
Voting agreements, and
|
6. |
Governance.
|
I. |
Loan Guarantee Requests
(Non US companies)
|
• |
The identity receiving the guarantee is not disclosed;
|
• |
The guarantee is being provided to a director, executive, parent company or affiliated entities where the company has no direct or indirect equity ownership; or
|
• |
the guarantee is provided to an entity in which the company’s ownership stake is less than 75%; and such guarantee is not proportionate to the company’s equity stake or other parties have not provided a counter guarantee.
|
• |
examine stated uses of proceeds, the size or specific amount of the loan requested, and interest rates to be charged. Seeks disclosure on, the specific relation of the party to be granted the loan by the company.
|
• |
BP will generally vote against the provision of loans to clients, controlling shareholders, and actual controlling persons of the company.
|
• |
BP will generally vote against the provision of loans to an entity in which the company's ownership stake is less than 75 percent and the financing provision is not proportionate to the company's equity stake.
|
A. |
Business Development Companies
|
1. |
The proposal to allow share issuances below NAV has an expiration date that is less than one year from the date shareholders approve the underlying proposal as required under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
|
2. |
a majority of the independent directors who have no financial interest in the sale have made a determination as to whether such sale would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders prior to selling shares below NAV; and
|
3. |
the company has demonstrated responsible past use of share issuances by either:
|
a. |
Outperforming peers in its 8-digit GICS group as measured by one and three year median TSRs; or
|
b. |
Providing disclosure that its past share issuances were priced at levels that resulted in only small or moderate discounts to NAV and economic dilution to existing non-participating shareholders.
|
B.
|
Multimanaged Funds/Subadvisers:
|
1. |
We SUPPORT the adoption of labor standards and codes of conduct for foreign and domestic suppliers as ways to protect brands and manage risk.
|
2. |
We SUPPORT reporting on countries with human rights abuses as ways to protect and manage risk.
|
3. |
We SUPPORT CERES Principles, environmental reporting and MacBride Principles.
|
4. |
We SUPPORT high-performance workplace standards.
|
5. |
We SUPPORT fair lending guidelines and disclosure at financial companies.
|
6. |
We SUPPORT reporting on equal opportunity and diversity.
|
7. |
We SUPPORT shareholder proposals for additional reporting beyond what is a regulatory requirement when the proposal is supported by management.
|
8. |
We OPPOSE resolutions that would fundamentally affect company performance and competitive increase of shareholder value.
|
9. |
We OPPOSE shareholder proposals requesting the adoption of specific charter language regarding board diversity unless the company fails to publicly disclose existing equal opportunity or nondiscrimination policies.
|
10. |
We OPPOSE shareholder proposals for reports outlining potential environmental damage from drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) unless: a) new legislation is adopted allowing development and drilling in the ANWR; b) the company intends to pursue operations in the ANWR, c) the company does not currently disclose an environmental risk report for their operations in the ANWR.
|
11. |
We OPPOSE shareholder proposals requesting a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions unless the company significantly lags behind industry standards or has been the subject of recent, substantial controversy on this issue.
|
12. |
We OPPOSE shareholder proposals on investing in renewable energy sources.
|
13. |
We review proposals requesting information on a company’s lobbying activities, including direct lobbying as well as grassroots lobbying activities on a CASE-BY-CASE basis taking into account; a) the company’s current disclosure of relevant lobbying policies, and management and board oversight; b) the company’s disclosure regarding trade associations or other groups that it supports, or is a member of, that engage in lobbying activities; and c) recent significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding the company’s lobbying-related activities..
|
14. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals requesting a company report on its energy efficiency policies, considering: a) the current level of disclosure related to energy efficiency policies, initiatives, and performance measures; b) level of participation in voluntary efficiency programs; c) compliance with applicable legislation and regulations; d) the company’s policies and initiatives relative to industry peers; and e) the cost associated with the proposed initiative.
|
15. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals requesting disclosure and implementation of internet privacy and censorship policies and procedures, considering: a) the level of disclosure of policies relating to privacy, freedom of speech, internet censorship and government monitoring; b) dialogue with governments and/or relevant groups; c) scope of involvement and investment in markets that maintain government censorship or internet monitoring; d) market-specific laws or regulations applicable to this issue that may be imposed on the company; e) level of controversy or litigation related to the company’s international human rights policies; and f) the cost associated with the proposed initiative.
|
16. |
We generally vote FOR proposals requesting greater disclosure of a company’s (natural gas) hydraulic fracturing operations, including measures the company has taken to manage and mitigate the potential community and environmental impacts of those operations, considering: a) the company’s current level of disclosure of relevant policies and oversight mechanisms; b) the company’s current level of such disclosure relative to its industry peers; c) potential relevant local, state, or national regulatory developments; and d) controversies, fines, or litigation related to the company’s hydraulic fracturing operations.
|
17. |
We will vote on a CASE-BY-CASE basis on proposals requesting company reports on, or to adopt a new policy on, water-related risks and concerns, taking into account: a) the company’s current disclosure of relevant policies, initiatives, oversight mechanisms, and water usage metrics; b) whether or not the company’s existing water-related policies and practices are consistent with relevant internationally recognized standards and national/local regulations; c) the potential financial impact or risk to the company associated with water-related concerns or issues; and d) recent, significant company controversies, fines, or litigation regarding water use by the company and its suppliers.
|
18. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE requests for the company to review and report on the financial and reputation risks associated with operations in “high risk” markets, such as a terrorism-sponsoring state or otherwise, taking into account: a) the nature, purpose, and scope of the operations and business involved that could be affected by social or political disruption; b) current disclosure of applicable risk assessment(s) and risk management procedures; c) compliance with US sanctions and laws; d) consideration of other international policies, standards, and laws; e) recent involvement in significant controversies or violations in "high risk" markets; and f) the cost associated with the initiative.
|
19. |
We SUPPORT proposals requesting company reporting on its policies, initiatives/procedures and oversight mechanisms related to toxic materials, including certain product line toxicities, and/or product safety in its supply chain, UNLESS: a) the company already discloses similar information through existing reports or policies such as a Supplier Code of Conduct and/or a sustainability report; or b) the company is in compliance with all applicable regulations and guidelines; or c) there is no existence of significant violations and/or fines related to toxic materials.
|
20. |
We review on a CASE-BY-CASE requests for workplace safety reports, including reports on accident risks reduction efforts taking into account; a) a) the nature of the company’s business specifically regarding company and employee exposure to health and safety risks; b) level of existing disclosure of its workplace health and safety performance data, health and safety management policies, initiatives, and oversight mechanisms; c) existence of recent, significant violations, fines, or controversy related to workplace health and safety ; and d) the company’s workplace health and safety performance relative to industry peers.
|
21. |
Establishment of Board Committees on Social Issues: Shareholder proposals requesting companies establish new standing board committees on social issues.
|
a. |
Existing oversight mechanisms (including current committee structure) regarding the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
b. |
Level of disclosure regarding the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
c. |
Company performance related to the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
d. |
Board committee structure compared to that of other companies in its industry sector; and/or
|
e. |
The scope and structure of the proposal.
|
22. |
Genetically Modified Ingredients (GMO):
|
a. |
Generally vote AGAINST proposals asking suppliers, genetic research companies, restaurants and food retail companies to voluntarily label genetically engineered (GE) ingredients in their products and/or eliminate GE ingredients. The cost of labeling and/or phasing out the use of GE ingredients may not be commensurate with the benefits to shareholders and is an issue better left to regulators.
|
b. |
Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals asking for a report on the feasibility of labeling products containing GE ingredients taking into account:
|
i. |
The company's business and the proportion of it affected by the resolution;
|
ii. |
The quality of the company’s disclosure on GE product labeling, related voluntary initiatives, and how this disclosure compares with industry peer disclosure; and
|
iii. |
Company’s current disclosure on the feasibility of GE product labeling, including information on the related costs.
|
c. |
Generally vote AGAINST proposals seeking a report on the social, health, and environmental effects of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Studies of this sort are better undertaken by regulators and the scientific community.
|
d. |
Generally vote AGAINST proposals to completely phase out GE ingredients from the company's products or proposals asking for reports outlining the steps necessary to eliminate GE ingredients from the company’s products. Such resolutions presuppose that there are proven health risks to GE ingredients
|
23. |
Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation and Domestic Partner Benefits
|
a. |
We will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to amend a company’s EEO statement or diversity policies to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity, unless the change would result in excessive costs for the company.
|
b. |
We will generally vote AGAINST proposals to extend company benefits to or eliminating benefits from domestic partners.
|
24. |
Equality of Opportunity: shareholder proposal requesting companies disclose their EEO-1 data
|
a. |
The company publicly discloses its comprehensive equal opportunity policies and initiatives;
|
b. |
The company already publicly discloses comprehensive workforce diversity data; and
|
c. |
The company has no recent significant EEO-related violations or litigation.
|
25. |
Political contributions and Trade Associations: Shareholder proposals calling for company to confirm political nonpartisanship, increase disclosure on political contributions and trade association spending and bar political contributions.
|
a. |
BP will generally vote AGAINST proposals asking the company to affirm political nonpartisanship in the workplace so long as:
|
i. |
There are no recent, significant controversies, fines or litigation regarding the company’s political contributions or trade association spending; and
|
ii. |
The company has procedures in place to ensure that employee contributions to company-sponsored political action committees (PACs) are strictly voluntary and prohibits coercion.
|
b. |
RIM will vote AGAINST proposals to publish in newspapers and public media the company’s political contributions. Such publications could present significant cost to the company without providing commensurate value to shareholders.
|
c. |
BP will vote on a CASE-BY-CASE basis on proposals to improve the disclosure of a company’s political contributions and trade association spending considering:
|
i. |
Recent significant controversy or litigation related to the company’s political contributions or governmental affairs; and
|
ii. |
The public availability of a company policy on political contributions and trade association spending including information on the types of organizations supported, the business rationale for supporting these organization, and the oversight and compliance procedure related to such expenditures of corporate assets.
|
d. |
BP will vote AGAINST proposals barring the company from making political contributions.
|
e. |
BP will vote AGAINST proposals asking for a list of company executives, directors, consultants, legal counsels, lobbyists, or investment bankers that have prior government service and whether such service had a bearing on the business of the company.
|
26. |
Recycling: We will vote on a CASE-BY-CASE basis on proposals to report on an existing recycling program, or adopt a new recycling program, taking into account: a) the nature of the company’s business; b) the current level of disclosure of the company’s existing related programs; c) the timetable prescribed by the proposal and the costs and methods of program implementation; d) the ability of the company to address the issues raised in the proposal; and e) the company’s recycling programs compared with the similar programs of its industry peers.
|
27. |
High levels of dissent - Shareholder dissent of 20 percent or more will generally be used as the trigger for disclosure analysis. In certain circumstances, BP may recommend a vote against the relevant resolution at a future general meeting if the company has not explained its reaction to the dissent.
|
28. |
BP will vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals requesting that a company conduct an assessment of the human rights risks in its operations or in its supply chain, or report on its human rights risk assessment process considering: a) the degree to which existing relevant policies and practices are disclosed, including information on the implementation of these policies and any related oversight mechanisms; b) the company’s industry and whether the company or its suppliers operation in countries or areas where there is a history of human rights concerns; c) recent, significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding human rights involving the company or its suppliers, and whether the company has taken remedial steps; and d) whether the proposal is unduly burdensome or overly prescriptive.
|
(a)
|
Articles of Incorporation.
|
(1)
|
Articles of Incorporation of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 24, 1988, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(2)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 24, 1988, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 12, 1988, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 12, 1988, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(5)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 27, 1990, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(6)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 1990, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 15, 1992, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(8)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 22, 1992, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(9)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1993, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(10)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1993, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(11)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 19, 1994, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(12)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 19, 1994, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(13)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 19, 1994, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(14)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 19, 1994, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(15)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 31, 1995.
|
(16)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 16, 1996.
|
(17)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 39 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 11, 1996.
|
(18)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 45 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 9, 1997.
|
(19)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 25, 1997.
|
(20)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 25, 1997.
|
(21)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1998.
|
(22)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1998.
|
(23)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 1998.
|
(24)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 1998.
|
(25)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 30, 1999.
|
(26)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 69 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 29,
1999.
|
(27)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 71 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2000.
|
(28)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 71 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2000.
|
(29)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 71 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2000.
|
(30)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 71 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2000.
|
(31)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 73 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 15, 2001.
|
(32)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant (
Boston Partners Bond Fund – Institutional Class and Boston Partners Bond Fund – Investor Class
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 77 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 15, 2002.
|
(33)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Boston Partners All-Cap Value Fund – Institutional Class and Boston Partners Bond Fund – Institutional Class
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 77 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 15, 2002.
|
(34)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Schneider Value Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 78 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 16, 2002.
|
(35)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Institutional Liquidity Fund for Credit Unions and Liquidity Fund for Credit Union Members
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 84 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2003.
|
(36)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 89 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2004.
|
(37)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Robeco WPG Core Bond Fund – Investor Class, Robeco WPG Core Bond Fund – Institutional Class, Robeco WPG Tudor Fund – Institutional Class, Robeco WPG Large Cap Growth Fund – Institutional Class
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 93 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 4, 2005.
|
(38)
|
Certificate of Correction of Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 95 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 23, 2005.
|
(39)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Robeco WPG Core Bond Fund – Investor Class, Robeco WPG Core Bond Fund – Institutional Class, Robeco WPG Tudor Fund – Institutional Class, Robeco WPG 130/30 Large Cap Core Fund f/k/a Robeco WPG Large Cap Growth Fund – Institutional Class
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 95 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 23, 2005.
|
(40)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Senbanc Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 96 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 6, 2005.
|
(41)
|
Articles of Amendment of Registrant (
Robeco WPG Core Bond Fund – Retirement Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 97 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on August 19, 2005.
|
(42)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Robeco WPG Core Bond Fund – Investor Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 99 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 27, 2005.
|
(43)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Bear Stearns CUFS MLP Mortgage Portfolio)
are incorporated
herein by reference to
Post-Effective Amendment No. 104 to the
Registrant’s
Registration
Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 18, 2006.
|
(44)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant
(Bear Stearns CUFS MLP Mortgage Portfolio)
are incorporated
herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 108 to the
Registrant’s
Registration
Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 2006.
|
(45)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Bear
Stearns
Ultra
Short
Income
Fund
f/k/a
Bear
Stearns
Enhanced
Income
Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 109 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 15, 2006.
|
(46)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Marvin & Palmer Large Cap Growth Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 109 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 15, 2006.
|
(47)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant
(Bear
Stearns
Ultra
Short
Income
Fund
f/k/a
Bear
Stearns
Enhanced
Income
Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 111 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2007.
|
(48)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Bear
Stearns
Ultra
Short
Income
Fund
f/k/a
Bear
Stearns
Enhanced
Income
Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 111 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2007.
|
(49)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Free Market U.S. Equity Fund, Free Market International Equity Fund, Free Market Fixed Income Fund)
incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 112 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 1, 2007.
|
(50)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Robeco WPG 130/30 Large Cap Core Fund – Investor Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 113 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 13, 2007.
|
(51)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
SAM Sustainable Water Fund, SAM Sustainable Climate Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 114 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 17, 2007.
|
(52)
|
Articles of Amendment of Registrant
(Robeco WPG 130/30 Large Cap Core Fund – Institutional Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 116 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 4, 2007.
|
(53)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Bear Stearns Multifactor 130/30 US Core Equity Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 123 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 17, 2007.
|
(54)
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of the Registrant
(Bear Stearns Ultra Short Income Fund f/k/a Bear Stearns Enhanced Income Fund
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 124 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2007.
|
(55)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
SAM Sustainable Global Active Fund, SAM Sustainable Themes Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 128 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 23, 2009.
|
(56)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Perimeter Small Cap Growth Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 129 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 2, 2009.
|
(57)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
S1 Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 135 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 19, 2010.
|
(58)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Robeco Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 136 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on August 4, 2010.
|
(59)
|
Articles of Amendment of Registrant
(Robeco WPG Small/Micro Cap Value Fund f/k/a Robeco WPG Small Cap Value Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 141 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2010.
|
(60)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Robeco Boston Partners Global Equity Fund and Robeco Boston Partners International Equity Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 142 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 14, 2011.
|
(61)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 144 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 15, 2011.
|
(62)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Free Market U.S. Equity Fund, Free Market International Equity Fund, Free Market Fixed Income Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 149 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2012.
|
(63)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Robeco Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 152 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 29, 2013.
|
(64)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Robeco Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund – Institutional Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 157 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2013.
|
(65)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Matson Money U.S. Equity VI Portfolio, Matson Money International VI Equity Portfolio, Matson Money Fixed Income VI Portfolio
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 159 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 20, 2013.
|
(66)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Scotia
Dynamic U.S. Growth Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 161 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 27, 2013.
|
(67)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Robeco Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund – Institutional Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(68)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund and Altair Smaller Companies Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(69)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Campbell Core Trend Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 171 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 16, 2014.
|
(70)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Free Market U.S. Equity Fund, Free Market International Equity Fund, Free Market Fixed Income Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 174 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(71)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Boston Partners Investment Funds
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 174 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(72)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Long/Short Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 182 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 16, 2015
|
(73)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Campbell Core Carry Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 182 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 16, 2015.
|
(74)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Boston Partners Alpha Blue Dynamic Equity Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 182 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 16, 2015.
|
(75)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund – Class C
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 184 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 30, 2015.
|
(76)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund – Institutional Class)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2015.
|
(77)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Summit Global Investments Small Cap Low Volatility Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 195 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 30, 2016.
|
(78)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Fasanara Capital Absolute Return Multi-Asset Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 198 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 29, 2016.
|
(79)
|
Articles of Amendment of Registrant
(Campbell Dynamic Trend Fund f/k/a Campbell Core Trend Fund and Campbell Multi-Asset Carry Fund f/k/a Campbell Core Carry Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(80)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Motley Fool Independence Fund, Motley Fool Great America Fund, and Motley Fool Epic Voyage Fund))
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 206 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 21, 2016.
|
(81)
|
Articles of Amendment of Registrant
(Motley Fool Emerging Markets Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 212 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2017.
|
(82)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Orinda Income Opportunities Fund)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 216 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 2017.
|
(83)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund — Class T)
are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 216 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 2017.
|
(84)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant (Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(85)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund)
are filed herewith.
|
(b)
|
By-Laws.
|
(1)
|
By-Laws, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 143 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 28, 2011.
|
(c)
|
Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders.
|
(1)
|
See Articles VI, VII, VIII, IX and XI of Registrant’s Articles of Incorporation dated February 17, 1988 which are incorporated herein by reference to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 24, 1988, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(2)
|
See Articles II, III, VI, XIII, and XIV of Registrant’s By-Laws as amended through August 25, 2004, which are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 89 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2004.
|
(d)
|
Investment Advisory Contracts.
|
(1)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement
(Schneider Small Cap Value Fund)
between Registrant and Schneider Capital Management Company is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1998.
|
(2)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement
(Bogle Investment Management Small Cap Growth Fund)
between Registrant and Bogle Investment Management, L.P. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 30, 1999.
|
(3)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement
(Schneider Value Fund)
between Registrant and Schneider Capital Management Company is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 80 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 1, 2002.
|
(4)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement
(Free Market U.S. Equity Fund, Free Market International Equity Fund, Free Market Fixed Income Fund)
between Registrant and Matson Money, Inc.
(f/k/a Abundance Technologies, Inc.)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 125 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 27, 2008
.
|
(5)
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Investment Advisory Agreement (
Free Market U.S. Equity Fund, Free Market International Equity Fund and Free Market Fixed Income Fund
) between Registrant and Matson Money, Inc.
(f/k/a Abundance Technologies, Inc.)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 157 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2013.
|
(6)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver Agreement
(Schneider Small Cap Value Fund)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(7)
|
Contractual Fee Waiver Agreement
(Schneider Value Fund)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2015.
|
(8)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver Agreement
(Boston Partners Investment Funds)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(9)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement (
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund
) between Registrant and Summit Global Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 160 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2013.
|
(10)
|
Contractual Fee Waiver Agreement (
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund
) between Registrant and Summit Global Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(11)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement
(Boston Partners Investment Funds)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. (f/k/a Robeco Investment Management, Inc.) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 157 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2013.
|
(12)
|
Addendum No. 1 to Investment Advisory Agreement (
Robeco Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. (f/k/a Robeco Investment Management, Inc.) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 160 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2013.
|
(13)
|
Form of Interim Investment Advisory Agreement (
Summit Global Investments Global Low Volatility Fund
(
f/k/a Scotia
Dynamic U.S. Growth Fund
)) between Registrant and Summit Global Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 213 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2017.
|
(14)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver Agreement (
Summit Global Investments Global Low Volatility Fund
(
f/k/a Scotia
Dynamic U.S. Growth Fund
)) between Registrant and Summit Global Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 213 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2017.
|
(15)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement (
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund
) between Registrant and Abbey Capital Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(16)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement (
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund
) between Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited and Abbey Capital Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(17)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Altis Partners (Jersey) Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(18)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Cantab Capital Partners, LLP is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(19)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Eclipse Capital Management, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(20)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Graham Capital Management, LP is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(21)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and P/E Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(22)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Revolution Capital Management, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(23)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Trigon Investment Advisors, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(24)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Harmonic Capital Partners LLP is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(25)
|
Addendum No. 2 to Investment Advisory Agreement (
Robeco WPG Small/Micro Cap Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. (f/k/a Robeco Investment Management, Inc.) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(26)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement (
Altair Smaller Companies Fund
) between Registrant and Altair Advisers LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(27)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement dated December 29, 2014 (
Campbell Core Trend Fund
) between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 175 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(28)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement dated January 2, 2015 (
Campbell Core Trend Fund
) between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 175 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(29)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement (
Campbell Core Trend Fund
) between Campbell Core Offshore Limited and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 175 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(30)
|
Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
among Registrant, Altair Advisers LLC and Aperio Group, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(31)
|
Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
among Registrant, Altair Advisers LLC and Driehaus Capital Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(32)
|
Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
among Registrant, Altair Advisers LLC and Granite Investment Partners, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(33)
|
Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
among Registrant, Altair Advisers LLC and Pacific Ridge Capital Partners, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(34)
|
Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
among Registrant, Altair Advisers LLC and Pier Capital, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(35)
|
Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
among Registrant, Altair Advisers LLC and River Road Asset Management, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(36)
|
Form of Addendum No. 3 to Investment Advisory Agreement (
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Long/Short Fund
) between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. (f/k/a Robeco Investment Management, Inc.) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 180 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on August 14, 2015.
|
(37)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement (
Campbell Multi-Asset Carry Fund, f/k/a
Campbell Core Carry Fund
) between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 181 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 2, 2015.
|
(38)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement (
Campbell Multi-Asset Carry Fund, f/k/a Campbell Core Carry Fund
) between Campbell Core Carry Offshore Limited and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 181 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 2, 2015.
|
(39)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement
(Summit Global Investments Small Cap Low Volatility Fund)
between Registrant and Summit Global Investments is
incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 195 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 30, 2016
.
|
(40)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver
(Summit Global Investments Small Cap Low Volatility Fund)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(41)
|
Contractual Fee Waiver
(Bogle Investment Management Small Cap Growth Fund)
between Registrant and Bogle Investment Management
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(42)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver
(Campbell Dynamic Trend Fund and Campbell Multi-Asset Carry Fund)
between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(43)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
between Registrant and Abbey Capital Limited
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 216 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 2017.
|
(44)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver
(
Matson Money U.S. Equity VI Portfolio, Matson Money International Equity VI Portfolio, and Matson Money Fixed Income VI Portfolio)
between Registrant and Matson Money Inc.
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(45)
|
Form of Addendum No. 4 to Investment Advisory Agreement (
Boston Partners All-Cap Value Fund
) between Registrant and
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. (f/k/a Robeco Investment Management, Inc.) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 213 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2017.
|
(46)
|
First Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund
) between Registrant and Abbey Capital Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 216 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 2017.
|
(47)
|
Form of Trading Advisory Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
among Abbey Capital Offshore Fund Limited, Abbey Capital Limited and Aspect Capital Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 216 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 2017.
|
(48)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement
(Orinda Income Opportunities Fund)
between Registrant and Orinda Asset Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(49)
|
Form of Expense Limitation and Reimbursement Agreement
(Orinda Income Opportunities Fund)
between Registrant and Orinda Asset Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(50)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement
(Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund)
between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 220 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 9, 2017.
|
(51)
|
Form of Investment Advisory Agreement
(Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund)
between Campbell Managed Futures LV Offshore Limited and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 220 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 9, 2017.
|
(52)
|
Form of Expense Limitation and Reimbursement Agreement
(Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund)
between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 220 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 9, 2017.
|
(53)
|
Form of Addendum No. 5 to Investment Advisory Agreement (
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
) between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. is filed herewith.
|
(54)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. is filed herewith.
|
(e)
|
Underwriting Contracts.
|
(1)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Abbey Capital Limited dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(2)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Altair Advisers LLC dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(3)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Bogle Investment Management, L.P. dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(4)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(5)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(6)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Matson Money, Inc. dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(7)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Schneider Capital Management Company dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(8)
|
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Summit Global Investments, LLC dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(9)
|
Form of Distribution Agreement
(Motley Fool Independence Fund, Motley Fool Great America Fund and Motley Fool Emerging Markets Fund (f/k/a Motley Fool Epic Voyage Fund)) for
between Registrant and Foreside Funds Distributors LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 212 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on February 28, 2017.
|
(10)
|
Form of Distribution Agreement
(Orinda Income Opportunities Fund)
between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Orinda Asset Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(11)
|
Form of Distribution Agreement (
Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund
) between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(12)
|
Form of Amended Exhibit A to the
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. dated June 30, 2016
is filed herewith.
|
(f)
|
Bonus or Profit Sharing Contracts.
|
(1)
|
Form
of
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
is
incorporated
herein
by
reference
to
Post-Effective
Amendment
No.
160
to
the
Registrant’s
Registration
Statement
(No.
33-20827)
filed
on
December
23,
2013.
|
(2)
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Post Effective Amendment No. 160 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2013.
|
(g)
|
Custodian Agreements.
|
(1)
|
Custody Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association dated June 30, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(2)
|
First Amendment dated June 30, 2016 to the Custody Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(3)
|
Addendum to Custody Agreement dated January 5, 2017 is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(4)
|
Form of Second Amendment to the Custody Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2016.
|
(5)
|
Form of Third Amendment to the Custody Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(6)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Custody Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association is filed herewith.
|
(h)
|
Other Material Contracts.
|
(1)
|
Non 12b-1 Shareholder Services Plan and Agreement
(Bogle Investment Management Small Cap Growth - Investor Shares)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 30, 1999.
|
(2)
|
Non-12b-1 Shareholder Services Plan and Related Form of Shareholder Servicing Agreement
(Robeco WPG Small/Micro Cap Value Fund f/k/a Robeco WPG Tudor Fund – Institutional Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 100 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 25, 2005.
|
(3)
|
Services Plan for Class I Shares and Form of Servicing Agreement (
Summit Global Investments Global Low Volatility Fund, formerly known as
Scotia
Dynamic U.S. Growth Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 161 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 27, 2013.
|
(4)
|
Services Plan for Class II Shares and Form of Servicing Agreement (
Summit Global Investments Global Low Volatility Fund, formerly known as
Scotia
Dynamic U.S. Growth Fund
) are incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 161 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 27, 2013.
|
(5)
|
Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(6)
|
First Amendment to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(7)
|
Form of Second Amendment to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(8)
|
Form of Third Amendment to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(9)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is filed herewith.
|
(10)
|
Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(11)
|
First Amendment to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(12)
|
Form of Second Amendment to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(13)
|
Form of Third Amendment to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(14)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is filed herewith.
|
(15)
|
Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated June 30, 2016
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(16)
|
First Amendment to the Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 207 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2016.
|
(17)
|
Form of Second Amendment to the Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(18)
|
Form of Third Amendment to the Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(19)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is filed herewith.
|
(i) (1)
|
Opinion of Counsel is filed herewith.
|
(2)
|
Consent of Counsel
is filed herewith.
|
(j)
|
None.
|
(k)
|
None.
|
(l)
|
Initial Capital Agreements.
|
(1)
|
Subscription Agreement, relating to Classes A through N, is incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 12, 1988, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(2)
|
Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Planco Financial Services, Inc., relating to Classes O and P is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 1990.
|
(3)
|
Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Planco Financial Services, Inc., relating to Class Q is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 1990.
|
(4)
|
Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Counselors Securities Inc. relating to Classes R, S, and Alpha 1 through Theta 4 is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 15, 1992, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(5)
|
Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Boston Partners Asset Management, L.P. relating to Classes TT and UU
(Boston Partners Mid Cap Value Fund)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 25, 1997.
|
(6)
|
Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Schneider Capital Management Company relating to Class YY
(Schneider Small Cap Value Fund)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1998.
|
(7)
|
Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Boston Partners Asset Management, L.P. relating to Classes DDD and EEE
(Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II (formerly Micro Cap Value))
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 1998.
|
(8)
|
Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Boston Partners Asset Management relating to Classes III and JJJ
(Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (formerly Market Neutral))
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 1998.
|
(9)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Boston Partners Asset Management, L. P. relating to Classes KKK and LLL
(Boston Partners Fund (formerly Long-Short Equity))
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 65 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 19, 1999.
|
(10)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Bogle Investment Management Small Cap Growth Fund)
between Registrant and Bogle Investment Management, L.P. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on September 30, 1999.
|
(11)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Boston Partners All-Cap Value Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Asset Management, L.P. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 80 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 1, 2002.
|
(12)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Schneider Value Fund)
between Registrant and Schneider Capital Management Company is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 80 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 1, 2002.
|
(13)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Robeco WPG Small/Micro Cap Value Fund f/k/a Robeco WPG Tudor Fund)
between Registrant and Weiss, Peck & Greer Investments is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 96 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 6, 2005.
|
(14)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Free Market U.S. Equity Fund)
between Registrant and Matson Money, Inc.
(f/k/a
Abundance
Technologies,
Inc.),
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 112 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 1, 2007.
|
(15)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Free Market International Equity Fund)
between Registrant and Matson Money, Inc.
(f/k/a
Abundance
Technologies,
Inc.)
, is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 112 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 1, 2007.
|
(16)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Free Market Fixed Income Fund)
between Registrant and Matson Money, Inc.
(f/k/a
Abundance
Technologies,
Inc.)
, is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 112 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 1, 2007.
|
(17)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement (
Perimeter Small Cap Growth Fund
) between Registrant and Perimeter Capital Management is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 134 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2009.
|
(18)
|
Purchase Agreement
(S1 Fund)
between Registrant and Simple Alternatives, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 138 to the Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2010.
|
(19)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Robeco Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 136 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on August 4, 2010.
|
|
|
(20)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Robeco Boston Partners Global Equity Fund)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 142 t the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 14, 2011.
|
(21)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Robeco Boston Partners International Equity Fund)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 142 t the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 14, 2011.
|
(22)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund)
between Registrant and Summit Global Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 157 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2013.
|
(23)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Robeco Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund-Investor Class)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management Inc. is incorporated hereby by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 160 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2013.
|
(24)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Robeco Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund-Institutional Class)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management Inc. is incorporated hereby by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 160 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2013.
|
(25)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Robeco Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund-Investor Class)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management Inc. is incorporated hereby by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 160 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2013.
|
(26)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement (
Summit Global Investments Global Low Volatility Fund, formerly known as
Scotia Dynamic U.S. Growth Fund
) between Registrant and Scotia Institutional Asset Management US, Ltd. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(27)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund)
between Registrant and Abbey Capital Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(28)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Altair Smaller Companies Fund)
between Registrant and Altair Advisers LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(29)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement (
Campbell Core Trend Fund
) between Registrant and Campbell & Company, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 175 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(30)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Long/Short Fund)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management, Inc. is incorporated
herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2015
.
|
(31)
|
Purchase Agreement
(Campbell Core Carry Fund)
between Registrant and Campbell & Company, Inc. is
incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2015.
|
(32)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Boston Partners Alpha Blue Dynamic Equity Fund)
between Registrant and Robeco Investment Management, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 182 to the Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 16, 2015.
|
(33)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Summit Global Investments Small Cap Low Volatility Fund)
between Registrant and Summit Global Investments, LLC is
incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 195 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 30, 2016
.
|
(34)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Orinda Income Opportunities Fund)
between Registrant and Orinda Asset Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(35)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund)
between Registrant and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 220 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 9, 2017.
|
(36)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. is filed herewith.
|
(m)
|
Rule 12b-1 Plan.
|
(1)
|
Plan of Distribution
(Bedford Money Market)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 23, 1989, and refiled electronically with Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on October 30, 1998.
|
(2)
|
Plan of Distribution
(Boston Partners Mid Cap Value Fund - Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 45 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 9, 1997.
|
(3)
|
Plan of Distribution
(Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II (formerly Micro Cap Value) - Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 53 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 1998.
|
(4)
|
Amendment to Plans of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 14, 1998.
|
(5)
|
Plan of Distribution
(Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (formerly Market Neutral) - Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 62 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 12, 1998.
|
(6)
|
Plan of Distribution
(Boston Partners Fund (formerly Long Short Equity) - Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 65 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 19, 1999.
|
(7)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1
(Boston Partners All-Cap Value Fund)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 80 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on November 1, 2002.
|
(8)
|
Agreement between Registrant, Bear Stearns Securities Corp. and Foreside Funds Distributors LLC
(f/k/a PFPC Distributors, Inc.)
dated as of November 17, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 101 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement filed on December 29, 2005.
|
(9)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1
(Perimeter Small Cap Growth Fund – Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 132 to the Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 22, 2009.
|
(10)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1(
Robeco Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund — Investor Class
) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 141 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 28, 2010.
|
(11)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1
(S1 Fund – R Shares)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 137 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 1, 2010.
|
(12)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1(
Robeco Boston Partners Global Equity Fund — Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 142 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 14, 2011.
|
(13)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Robeco Boston Partners International Equity Fund — Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 142 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 14, 2011.
|
(14)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund — Retail Class)
is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 144 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 15, 2011.
|
(15)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund – Class A)
is incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 144 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 15, 2011.
|
(16)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Robeco Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund — Investor Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 154 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 11, 2013.
|
(17)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund — Class A)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(18)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund — Class C)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(19)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Summit Global U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund —Class C)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 184 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 30, 2015.
|
(20)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Summit Global Investments Small Cap Low Volatility Fund – Retail Class)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 195 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 30, 2016.
|
(21)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Summit Global Investments Small Cap Low Volatility Fund – Class C)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 195 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on March 30, 2016.
|
(22)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund — Class T)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 216 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on April 10, 2017.
|
(23)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Orinda Income Opportunities Fund-Class A)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(24)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Orinda Income Opportunities Fund-Class D)
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
(25)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund — Class N
) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(26)
|
Plan of Distribution pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (
Campbell Managed Futures 10V Fund — Class T
) is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 224 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 28, 2017.
|
(n)
|
Rule 18f-3 Plan.
|
(1)
|
Amended Rule 18f-3 Plan is filed herewith.
|
(p)
|
Code of Ethics.
|
(1)
|
Code
of
Ethics
of
the
Registrant
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 110 to Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 29, 2006.
|
(2)
|
Code
of
Ethics
of
Robeco
Investment
Management
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2011.
|
(3)
|
Code
of
Ethics
of
Schneider
Capital
Management
Company
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 129 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 2, 2009.
|
(4)
|
Code
of
Ethics
of
Bogle
Investment
Management,
L.P.
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 129 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on July 2, 2009.
|
(5)
|
Code
of
Ethics
of
Matson
Money,
Inc.
is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2011.
|
(6)
|
Code of Ethics of Perimeter Capital Management is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 149 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2012.
|
(7)
|
Code of Ethics of Simple Alternatives, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 149 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2012.
|
(8)
|
Code of Ethics of Blue Lion Capital Management, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2011.
|
(9)
|
Code of Ethics of Courage Capital Management, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2011.
|
(10)
|
Code of Ethics of Starwood Real Estate Securities, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 137 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 1, 2010.
|
(11)
|
Code of Ethics of Foreside Funds Distributors LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 182 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 16, 2015.
|
(12)
|
Code of Ethics of Summit Global Investments, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 30, 2011.
|
(13)
|
Code of Ethics of Maerisland Capital, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 149 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2012.
|
(14)
|
Code of Ethics of Sonica Capital, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 157 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2013.
|
(15)
|
Code of Ethics of Garelick Capital Partners, L.P. is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 157 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 29, 2013.
|
(16)
|
Code of Ethics of Abbey Capital Limited is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on June 30, 2014.
|
(17)
|
Code of Ethics of Altair Advisers LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(18)
|
Code of Ethics of Aperio Group is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(19)
|
Code of Ethics of Driehaus Capital Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(20)
|
Code of Ethics of Granite Investment Partners, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(21)
|
Code of Ethics of Pacific Ridge Capital Partners, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(22)
|
Code of Ethics of Pier Capital LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(23)
|
Code of Ethics of River Road Asset Management, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 172 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on October 17, 2014.
|
(24)
|
Code of Ethics of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 175 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on December 23, 2014.
|
(25)
|
Code of Ethics of Quasar Distributors, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 210 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on January 31, 2017.
|
(26)
|
Code of Ethics of Orinda Asset Management LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (No. 33-20827) filed on May 1, 2017.
|
1.
|
Bogle Investment Management, LP:
The sole business activity of Bogle Investment Management, LP (“Bogle”), 2310 Washington Street, Suite 310, Newton Lower Falls, MA 02462, is to serve as an investment adviser. Bogle is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
The directors and officers have not held any positions with other companies during the last two fiscal years.
|
2.
|
Schneider Capital Management Company:
The sole business activity of Schneider Capital Management Company
(“Schneider”),
460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 2000, Wayne, PA 19087, is to serve as an investment adviser. Schneider is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Information as to the directors and officers of Schneider is as follows:
|
Name and Position with Schneider
|
Other Company
|
Position With Other Company
|
||
Arnold C. Schneider, III
President and Chief Investment Officer
|
Turnbridge Management Partners Corp.
|
President
|
||
Steven J. Fellin
Sr. Vice President, Chief Operating & Financial Officer Chief Compliance Officer
|
Turnbridge Management Partners Corp.
|
Vice President
|
3.
|
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
The sole business activity of Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
(“Boston Partners”),
909 Third Avenue, New York 10022, is to serve as an investment adviser. Boston Partners provides investment advisory services to the Boston Partners Funds and the WPG Partners Funds.
Boston Partners is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and serves as an investment adviser to domestic and foreign institutional investors, investment companies, commingled trust funds, private investment partnerships and collective investment vehicles. Information as to the directors and officers of Boston Partners is as follows:
|
Name and Position with Boston Partners
|
Other Company
|
Position With Other Company
|
||
Mark E. Donovan
Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
Robeco Institutional Asset Management US Inc.
|
Director
|
||
Joseph F. Feeney, Jr.
Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
Robeco US Holding, Inc.
|
Director
|
||
William George Butterly, III
Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary
|
Robeco Institutional Asset Management US Inc.
|
Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary
|
||
Robeco Securities, L.L.C.
|
Chief Legal Officer
|
|||
Robeco Trust Company
|
Chief Operating Officer, Secretary & Director
|
|||
RobecoSAM USA, Inc.
|
Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary
|
|||
Robeco Boston Partners (UK) Limited
|
Director, Chief Operating Officer & Secretary
|
Matthew J. Davis
Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
|
Robeco Institutional Asset Management US Inc.
|
President, Treasurer & Director
|
||
Robeco Securities, L.L.C.
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|||
Robeco Trust Company
|
Director, President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer & Director
|
|||
Robeco Boston Partners (UK) Limited
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|||
David Steyn
Director
|
Robeco Groep N.V.
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Leni M. Boeren
Director
|
Robeco Groep N.V.
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
||
Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.
|
Director
|
|||
RobecoSAM AG
|
Director
|
|||
RobecoSAM USA, Inc.
|
Director
|
Martin Mlynár
Director
|
Corestone Investment Managers AG
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Source Capital AG
|
Board Member
|
|||
Source Capital Holding AG
|
Board Member
|
4.
|
Matson Money, Inc.:
The sole business activity of Matson Money, Inc. (“Matson Money”), 5955 Deerfield Blvd., Mason, OH 45040,
is to serve as an investment adviser.
Matson Money is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Below is a list of each executive officer and director of Matson Money indicating each business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each such person has been engaged within the last two years, for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, partner or trustee.
|
Name and Position with Matson Money, Inc.
|
Name of Other Company
|
Position With Other Company
|
|
Mark E. Matson
CEO
|
Keep It Tight Fitness, LLC
|
50% owner
|
|
Mark E. Matson
CEO
|
The Matson FamilyFoundation
|
100% owner
|
|
Michelle Matson
Vice President/ Secretary
|
None
|
None
|
|
Daniel J. List
Chief Compliance Officer
|
None
|
None
|
|
Steven B. Miller
President
|
None
|
None
|
5.
|
Summit Global Investments, LLC:
The sole business activity of Summit Global Investments, LLC (“SGI”), 620 South Main Street, Bountiful, Utah 84010, is to serve as an investment adviser. SGI is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
The only employment of a substantial nature of each of SGI’s directors and officers is with SGI.
|
|
6.
|
Abbey Capital Limited:
The only employment of a substantial nature of each of Abbey Capital Limited directors and officers is with Abbey Capital Limited.
|
|
7.
|
Altair Advisers LLC:
The only employment of a substantial nature of each of Altair Advisers LLC directors and officers is with Altair Advisers LLC.
|
|
8.
|
Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC:
The principal business activity of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC (“CCIA”), 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, MD 21209, is to serve as an investment adviser. CCIA is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Below is a list of each executive officer and director of CCIA indicating each business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each such person has been engaged within the last two years, for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, partner or trustee.
|
Name and Position with CCIA
|
Name of Other Company
|
Position With Other Company
|
|
G. Williams Andrews
Chief Executive Officer
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Campbell & Company, LLC
|
Director & Chief Executive Officer
|
||
EC LLC
|
Managing Member
|
||
The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust
|
Trustee & Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Campbell Financial Services, LLC
|
Director
|
||
Campbell & Company International Bahamas Limited
|
Director & President
|
||
Campbell Core Offshore Limited
|
Director
|
||
Campbell Core Carry Offshore Limited
|
Director
|
||
Gregory T. Donovan
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
|
|
Campbell & Company, LLC
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
|
||
Campbell Financial Services, LLC
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
||
Campbell & Company International Bahamas Limited
|
Director & Treasurer
|
Michael S. Harris
President
|
Campbell & Company, LLC
|
President
|
|
Campbell & Company, LLC
|
Director & President
|
||
EC LLC
|
Managing Member
|
||
The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust
|
President
|
||
Campbell Financial Services, LLC
|
Director
|
||
Managed Futures Association
|
Director & Vice-Chairman
|
||
Campbell & Company International Bahamas Limited
|
Director
|
||
Campbell Core Offshore Limited
|
Director
|
||
Campbell Core Carry Offshore Limited
|
Director
|
||
Dr. Xiaohua Hu
Director of Research
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Director of Research
|
|
Heidi L. Kaiser
Deputy General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer, Anti-Money Laundering Officer
|
The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust
|
Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Campbell Financial Services, LLC
|
Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
|
||
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Deputy General Counsel & Director of Compliance, Anti-Money Laundering Officer
|
||
Thomas P. Lloyd
General Counsel, & Secretary
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
General Counsel & Secretary
|
|
Campbell & Company, LLC
|
Secretary
|
EC LLC
|
Managing Member
|
||
The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust
|
General Counsel, Secretary & Assistant Treasurer
|
||
Campbell & Company International Bahamas Limited
|
Secretary
|
||
Campbell Core Offshore Limited
|
Director
|
||
Campbell Core Carry Offshore Limited
|
Director
|
||
Campbell Financial Services, LLC
|
General Counsel & Director; previously, Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary until September 2014
|
||
Robert W. McBride
Chief Technology Officer
|
Campbell & Company, LLC
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
John R. Radle
Global Head of Trading
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Global Head of Trading
|
|
Richard Johnson
Managing Director
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Managing Director, Global Head of Client Solutions Group of Campbell & Company
|
|
Darvin N. Sterner
Director of Private Wealth Distribution
|
Campbell & Company, LP
|
Director of Private Wealth Distribution
|
|
Campbell Financial Services, LLC
|
Vice President
|
9.
|
Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC:
A description of any other business, profession, vocation, or employment of a substantial nature in which Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC and each director, officer, or partner of Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC is or has been engaged within the last two fiscal years for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, employee, partner or trustee, is set forth in the Form ADV of Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC, as filed with the SEC on January 17, 2017, and is incorporated herein by this reference.
|
|
10.
|
Orinda Asset Management, LLC:
A description of any other business, profession, vocation, or employment of a substantial nature in which Orinda Asset Management, LLC and each director, officer, or partner of Orinda Asset Management, LLC is or has been engaged within the last two fiscal years for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, employee, partner or trustee, is set forth in the Form ADV of Orinda Asset Management LLC, as filed with the SEC on March 27, 2017, and is incorporated herein by this reference.
|
(a) |
Quasar Distributors, LLC, the Registrant’s principal underwriter, acts as principal underwriter for the following investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended:
|
Academy Funds Trust
|
Kirr Marbach Partners Funds, Inc.
|
Advisors Series Trust
|
LKCM Funds
|
Aegis Funds
|
LoCorr Investment Trust
|
Allied Asset Advisors Funds
|
Lord Asset Management Trust
|
Alpha Architect ETF Trust
|
MainGate Trust
|
Alpine Equity Trust
|
Managed Portfolio Series
|
Alpine Income Trust
|
Manager Directed Portfolios
|
Alpine Series Trust
|
Matrix Advisors Value Fund, Inc.
|
Amplify ETF Trust
|
Merger Fund
|
Angel Oak Funds Trust
|
Monetta Trust
|
Appleton Funds
|
Nicholas Equity Income Fund, Inc.
|
Barrett Opportunity Fund, Inc.
|
Nicholas Family of Funds, Inc.
|
Bridge Builder Trust
|
Oaktree Funds
|
Bridges Investment Fund, Inc.
|
Permanent Portfolio Family of Funds, Inc.
|
Brookfield Investment Funds
|
Perritt Funds, Inc.
|
Brown Advisory Funds
|
PRIMECAP Odyssey Funds
|
Buffalo Funds
|
Professionally Managed Portfolios
|
CG Funds Trust
|
Prospector Funds, Inc.
|
Compass EMP Funds Trust
|
Provident Mutual Funds, Inc.
|
DoubleLine Funds Trust
|
Rainier Investment Management Mutual Funds
|
ETF Series Solutions
|
RBB Fund, Inc.
|
Evermore Funds Trust
|
RBC Funds Trust
|
FactorShares Trust
|
Series Portfolio Trust
|
First American Funds, Inc.
|
Sims Total Return Fund, Inc.
|
FundX Investment Trust
|
Stone Ridge Trust
|
Glenmede Fund, Inc.
|
Stone Ridge Trust II
|
Glenmede Portfolios
|
Stone Ridge Trust III
|
GoodHaven Funds Trust
|
Stone Ridge Trust V
|
Greenspring Fund, Inc.
|
Thompson IM Funds, Inc.
|
Guinness Atkinson Funds
|
TrimTabs ETF Trust
|
Harding Loevner Funds, Inc.
|
Trust for Professional Managers
|
Hennessy Funds Trust
|
Trust for Advised Portfolios
|
Horizon Funds
|
USA Mutuals
|
Hotchkis & Wiley Funds
|
Victory Portfolios II
|
Intrepid Capital Management Funds Trust
|
Wall Street EWM Funds Trust
|
IronBridge Funds, Inc.
|
Westchester Capital Funds
|
Jacob Funds, Inc.
|
Wisconsin Capital Funds, Inc.
|
Jensen Portfolio, Inc.
|
YCG Funds
|
(b) |
To the best of Registrant’s knowledge, the directors and executive officers of Quasar Distributors, LLC are as follows:
|
Name and Principal
Business Address
|
Position and Offices with Quasar Distributors, LLC
|
Positions and Offices with Registrant
|
James R. Schoenike
(1)
|
President, Board Member
|
None
|
Andrew M. Strnad
(2)
|
Vice President, Secretary
|
None
|
Joe Neuberger
(1)
|
Board Member
|
None
|
Robert Kern
(1)
|
Board Member
|
None
|
Susan LaFond
(1)
|
Vice President, Treasurer
|
None
|
Peter A. Hovel
(1)
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
None
|
Teresa Cowan
(1)
|
Senior Vice President, Assistant Secretary
|
None
|
Brett Scribner
(3)
|
Assistant Treasurer
|
None
|
(1) |
This individual is located at 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.
|
(2) |
This individual is located at 10 West Market Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.
|
(3) |
This individual is located at 800 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
|
(c) |
Not Applicable
|
(1) |
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc., 909 Third Avenue, 32
nd
floor, New York, New York 10022 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(2) |
Schneider Capital Management Co., 460 East Swedesford Road, Suite 1080, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(3) |
Bogle Investment Management, L.P., 2310 Washington Street, Suite 310, Newton Lower Falls, Massachusetts 02462 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(4) |
Matson Money, Inc. (formerly Abundance Technologies, Inc.),
5955 Deerfield Blvd., Mason, OH 45040 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(5) |
Summit Global Investments, LLC, 620 South Main Street, Bountiful, Utah 84010 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(6) |
Abbey Capital Limited, 1-2 Cavendish Row, Dublin 1, Ireland (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(7) |
Altair Advisers LLC, 303 West Madison, Suite 600, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(8) |
Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21209 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(9) |
Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC, 2000 Duke Street, Suite 175, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (records relating to its function as investment adviser).
|
(10) |
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 (records relating to its function as administrator, transfer agent and dividend disbursing agent).
|
(11) |
U.S. Bank, N.A., 1555 North River Center Drive, Suite 302, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53212 (records relating to its function as custodian).
|
(12) |
Quasar Distributors, LLC, 777 East Wisconsin Avenue, Floor, 6, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 (records relating to its function as underwriter).
|
(a) |
Registrant hereby undertakes to hold a meeting of shareholders for the purpose of considering the removal of directors in the event the requisite number of shareholders so request.
|
(b) |
Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish each person to whom a prospectus is delivered a copy of Registrant’s latest annual report to shareholders upon request and without charge.
|
THE RBB FUND, INC.
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Salvatore Faia
|
||
Salvatore Faia
|
|||
President
|
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
||
/s/ Salvatore Faia
|
President (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Compliance Officer
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Salvatore Faia
|
||||
/s/ James G. Shaw
|
Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) and Secretary
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
James G. Shaw
|
||||
*J. Richard Carnall
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
J. Richard Carnall
|
||||
*Julian A. Brodsky
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Julian A. Brodsky
|
||||
*Arnold M. Reichman
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Arnold M. Reichman
|
||||
*Robert Sablowsky
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Robert Sablowsky
|
||||
*Robert Straniere
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Robert Straniere
|
||||
*Nicholas A. Giordano
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Nicholas A. Giordano
|
||||
*Gregory P. Chandler
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Gregory P. Chandler
|
||||
*Sam Lambroza
|
Director
|
August 23, 2017
|
||
Sam Lambroza
|
||||
*By:
|
/s/ Salvatore Faia |
August 23, 2017
|
||
Salvatore Faia
Attorney-in-Fact
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ Julian A. Brodsky
|
||
Julian A. Brodsky
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ J. Richard Carnall
|
||
J. Richard Carnall
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ Nicholas A. Giordano
|
||
Nicholas A. Giordano
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ Arnold M. Reichman
|
||
Arnold M. Reichman
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ Robert Sablowsky
|
||
Robert Sablowsky
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ Robert Straniere
|
||
Robert Straniere
|
DATED:
|
February 17, 2017
|
|
/s/ Gregory P. Chandler
|
||
Gregory P. Chandler
|
DATED:
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
/s/ Sam Lambroza
|
||
Sam Lambroza
|
EXHIBIT
|
DESCRIPTION
|
(a)(85)
|
Articles Supplementary of Registrant
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund).
|
(d)(53)
|
Form of Addendum No. 5 to Investment Advisory Agreement (
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
) between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
|
(d)(54)
|
Form of Contractual Fee Waiver
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
|
(e)(12)
|
Form of Amended Exhibit A to the
Distribution Agreement between Registrant, Quasar Distributors, LLC, and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc. dated June 30, 2016.
|
(g)(6)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Custody Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.
|
(h)(9)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC.
|
(h)(14)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC.
|
(h)(19)
|
Form of Fourth Amendment to the Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC.
|
(i)(1)
|
Opinion of Counsel.
|
(i)(2)
|
Consent of Counsel.
|
(l)(36)
|
Form of Purchase Agreement
(Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund)
between Registrant and Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
|
(n)(1)
|
Amended Rule 18f-3 Plan.
|
1. |
Class SSSSSS
. 100,000,000 shares of authorized but unclassified and unissued shares of Common Stock (the “Undesignated Common Stock”) are hereby classified and designated as Class SSSSSS shares of Common Stock representing interests in the Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund shares.
|
Class A
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class B
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class C
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class D
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class E
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class F
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class G
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class H
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class I
|
-
|
1,500,000,000
|
Class J
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class K
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class L
|
-
|
1,500,000,000
|
Class M
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class N
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class O
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class P
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class Q
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class R
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class S
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class T
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class U
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class V
|
-
|
500,000,000
|
Class W
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class X
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class Y
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class Z
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class AA
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class BB
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class CC
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class DD
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class EE
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class FF
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class GG
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
Class XXXXX
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class YYYYY
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class ZZZZZ
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class AAAAAA
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class BBBBBB
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class CCCCCC
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class DDDDDD
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class EEEEEE
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class FFFFFF
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class GGGGGG
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class HHHHHH
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class IIIIII
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class JJJJJJ
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class KKKKKK
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class LLLLLL
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class MMMMMM
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class NNNNNN
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class OOOOOO
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class PPPPPP
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class QQQQQQ
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class RRRRRR
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class SSSSSS
|
-
|
100,000,000
|
Class Select
|
-
|
700,000,000
|
Class Beta 2
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Beta 3
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Beta 4
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Principal Money | - |
700,000,000
|
Class Gamma 2
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Gamma 3
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Gamma 4
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Bear Stearns Money
|
-
|
2,500,000,000
|
Class Bear Stearns Municipal Money
|
-
|
1,500,000,000
|
Class Bear Stearns Government Money
|
-
|
1,000,000,000
|
Class Delta 4
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Epsilon 1
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Epsilon 2
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Epsilon 3
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Epsilon 4
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Zeta 1
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Zeta 2
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Class Zeta 3
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
ATTEST: | THE RBB FUND, INC. | |||
By:
|
/s/ James G. Shaw
|
By:
|
/s/ Salvatore Faia
|
|
James G. Shaw
|
Salvatore Faia
|
|||
Secretary
|
President
|
1. |
Schedule A to the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, as provided on Appendix 1 attached hereto, as of the Effective Date.
|
2. |
Schedule B to the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, as provided on Appendix 2 attached hereto, as of the Effective Date.
|
3. |
The Agreement shall become effective with respect to the Portfolio as of the Effective Date and, unless sooner terminated as provided in the Agreement, shall continue with respect to the Portfolio until August 16, 2018. Thereafter, if not terminated, the Agreement shall continue with respect to the Portfolio for successive annual periods ending on August 16, provided such continuance is specifically approved at least annually (a) by the vote of a majority of those members of the Board of Directors of the Fund who are not parties to this Agreement or interested persons of any such party, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval, and (b) by the Board of Directors of the Fund or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Portfolio; provided, however, that this Agreement may be terminated with respect to the Portfolio by the Fund at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by the Board of Directors of the Fund or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Portfolio, on 60 days’ prior written notice to the Investment Adviser, or by the Investment Adviser at any time, without payment of any penalty, on 60 days’ prior written notice to the Fund. The Agreement will immediately terminate in the event of its assignment.
|
4. |
From and after the Effective Date, the term “Portfolios” as used in the Agreement shall be deemed to include the Portfolio. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
|
5. |
Except to the extent supplemented hereby, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
|
|
THE RBB FUND, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Faia
|
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
BOSTON PARTNERS GLOBAL INVESTORS, INC. (FORMERLY, ROBECO INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
William G. Butterly, III
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
Senior Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Davis
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Senior Managing Director
|
Name of Portfolio
|
Annual Management Fee
|
Boston Partners All-Cap Value Fund
|
0.70%
|
Boston Partners Global Equity Fund
|
0.90%
|
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund
|
2.25%
|
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund
|
1.25%
|
Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II
|
1.00%
|
WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund
|
0.80% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and 0.75% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets in excess of $500 million
|
Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund
|
1.50%
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Long/Short Fund
|
1.85%
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
|
0.85%
|
|
BOSTON PARTNERS GLOBAL INVESTORS, INC.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By:
|
|
||
|
Name:
|
William G. Butterly, III
|
||
|
Title:
|
Chief Operation Officer
|
||
|
|
Senior Managing Director
|
||
|
|
|||
Your signature below acknowledges
|
|
|||
acceptance of this Agreement:
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
By:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Faia
|
|
||
|
President
|
|
||
|
The RBB Fund, Inc.
|
THE RBB FUND, INC. | QUASAR DISTRIBUTORS, LLC | ||||
By: | By: | ||||
Printed Name: Salvatore Faia | Printed Name: James R. Schoenike | ||||
Title: President | Title: President |
THE RBB FUND, INC. | U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | ||||
By: | By: | ||||
Printed Name: Salvatore Faia | Printed Name: Michael L. Ceccato | ||||
Title: President | Title: Senior Vice President |
THE RBB FUND, INC. | U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC | ||||
By: | By: | ||||
Printed Name: Salvatore Faia | Printed Name: Michael L. Ceccato | ||||
Title: President | Title: Senior Vice President |
THE RBB FUND, INC. | U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC | ||||
By: | By: | ||||
Printed Name: Salvatore Faia | Printed Name: Michael L. Ceccato | ||||
Title: President | Title: Senior Vice President |
THE RBB FUND, INC. | U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC | ||||
By: | By: | ||||
Printed Name: Salvatore Faia | Printed Name: Michael L. Ceccato | ||||
Title: President | Title: Senior Vice President |
Re: |
Shares Registered by Post-Effective Amendment No. 226 to Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 33-20827)
|
PORTFOLIO
|
CLASS
|
AUTHORIZED SHARES
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
|
SSSSSS
|
100 million
|
Very truly yours, | ||
/s/ Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | ||
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP |
/s/ Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | ||
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP | ||
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | ||
August 23, 2017 |
|
THE RBB FUND, INC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Salvatore Faia
|
|
|
Title
|
President
|
|
|
|
||
|
BOSTON PARTNERS GLOBAL INVESTORS, INC.
|
||
|
|
||
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
||
|
Title:
|
Adviser / Series
|
Class
|
Class Designation
|
12b-1 Plan
|
Non 12b-1
|
Front-End Sales Charge
|
Bogle Investment Management L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small Cap Growth Fund
|
Institutional Class
|
NNN
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund
|
Investor Class
Institutional Class
|
JJJ
III
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
No
No
|
Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II
|
Investor Class
Institutional Class
|
EEE
DDD
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
No
No
|
Boston Partners All-Cap Value Fund
|
Investor Class
Institutional Class
|
WW
VV
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
No
No
|
WPG Small/Micro Cap Value Fund
|
Institutional Class
|
UUU
|
No
|
0.25%
|
No
|
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund
|
Investor Class
Institutional Class
|
AAAAA
BBBBB
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
No
No
|
Boston Partners Global Equity Fund
|
Investor Class
Institutional Class
|
CCCCC
DDDDD
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
No
No
|
Boston Partners
Global Long/Short Fund
|
Investor Class
Institutional Class
|
JJJJJ
KKKKK
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
No
No
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Long/Short Fund
|
Institutional Class
|
WWWWW
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund
|
Institutional Class
|
SSSSSS
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Schneider Capital Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schneider Small Cap Value Fund
|
1 Class
|
YY
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Matson Money, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
|
1 Class
|
BBBB
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Free Market International Equity Fund
|
1 Class
|
CCCC
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Free Market Fixed Income Fund
|
1 Class
|
DDDD
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Matson Money U.S. Equity VI Portfolio
|
1 Class
|
LLLLL
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Matson Money International Equity Portfolio
|
1 Class
|
MMMMM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Matson Money Fixed Income VI Portfolio
|
1 Class
|
NNNNN
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Summit Global Investments LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summit Global Investments U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund
|
Class A
Class I
|
GGGGG
HHHHH
|
0.25%
No
|
No
No
|
5.25%
No
|
Adviser / Series
|
Class
|
Class Designation
|
12b-1 Plan
|
Non 12b-1
|
Front-End Sales Charge
|
FAMILY
|
Each Portfolio (Class) . . .
|
May Be Exchanged For Any of
|
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund
|
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund (RRRRR)*
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund (SSSSS)*
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund (TTTTT)*
* provided the shareholder meets the eligibility requirements for the class shares are being exchanged for or is otherwise eligible to purchase that class of shares
|
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund (RRRRR)
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund (SSSSS)
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund (TTTTT)
|
Boston Partners Investment Funds
(Investor Classes)
|
Boston Partners All-Cap Value (WW)
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II (EEE)
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (JJJ)
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (AAAAA)
Boston Partners Global Equity Fund (CCCCC)
Boston Partners
Global Long/Short Fund (JJJJJ)
|
Boston Partners All-Cap Value (WW)
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II (EEE)
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (JJJ)
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (AAAAA)
Boston Partners Global Equity Fund (CCCCC)
Boston Partners
Global Long/Short Fund (JJJJJ)
|
Boston Partners Investment Funds
(Investor Classes)
|
Boston Partners All-Cap Value (WW)*
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II (EEE)*
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (JJJ)*
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (AAAAA)*
Boston Partners Global Equity Fund (CCCCC)*
Boston Partners
Global Long/Short Fund (JJJJJ)*
*provided the accumulated net asset value
exceeds the minimum initial investment amount for Institutional Class Shares or the shareholder is otherwise eligible to purchase Institutional Class Shares and the investor is a financial intermediary sponsored fee-based program.
|
Boston Partners All-Cap Value (VV)
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II (DDD)
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity (III)
WPG Small/Micro Cap Value Fund (UUU)
Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund (BBBBB)
Boston Partners Global Equity Fund (DDDDD)
Boston Partners
Global Long/Short Fund (KKKKK)
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Long/Short Fund (WWWWW)
Boston Partners Emerging Markets Fund (SSSSSS)
|
Matson Money Free Market Funds
(I Class)
|
Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (BBBB)
Free Market International Equity Fund (CCCC)
Free Market Fixed Income Fund (DDDD)
|
Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (BBBB)
Free Market International Equity Fund (CCCC)
Free Market Fixed Income Fund (DDDD)
|
Motley Fool Funds (Investor Classes)
|
Motley Fool Independence Fund (EEEEEE)
Motley Fool Great America Fund (GGGGGG)
Motley Fool Emerging Markets Fund (IIIIII)
|
Motley Fool Independence Fund (EEEEEE)
Motley Fool Great America Fund (GGGGGG)
Motley Fool Emerging Markets Fund (IIIIII)
|
Motley Fool Funds (Institutional Classes)
|
Motley Fool Independence Fund (FFFFFF)
Motley Fool Great America Fund (HHHHHH)
Motley Fool Emerging Markets Fund (JJJJJJ)
|
Motley Fool Independence Fund (FFFFFF)
Motley Fool Great America Fund (HHHHHH)
Motley Fool Emerging Markets Fund (JJJJJJ)
|
FAMILY
|
Each Portfolio (Class) . . .
|
May Be Exchanged For Any of
|
*
|
During periods when these Portfolios are closed they are not eligible for exchange with the exception of an exchange from one class of shares into another class of shares within the same Portfolio.
|