NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Company changed its name from Realogy Holdings Corp. to Anywhere Real Estate Inc. effective June 9, 2022. Anywhere Real Estate Inc. ("Anywhere" or the "Company") is a holding company for its consolidated subsidiaries including Anywhere Intermediate Holdings LLC ("Anywhere Intermediate") and Anywhere Real Estate Group LLC ("Anywhere Group") and its consolidated subsidiaries. Anywhere, through its subsidiaries, is a global provider of residential real estate services. Neither Anywhere, the indirect parent of Anywhere Group, nor Anywhere Intermediate, the direct parent company of Anywhere Group, conducts any operations other than with respect to its respective direct or indirect ownership of Anywhere Group. As a result, the consolidated financial positions, results of operations, comprehensive (loss) income and cash flows of Anywhere, Anywhere Intermediate and Anywhere Group are the same.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of Anywhere and Anywhere Group. Anywhere's only asset is its investment in the common stock of Anywhere Intermediate, and Anywhere Intermediate's only asset is its investment in Anywhere Group. Anywhere's only obligations are its guarantees of certain borrowings and certain franchise obligations of Anywhere Group. All expenses incurred by Anywhere and Anywhere Intermediate are for the benefit of Anywhere Group and have been reflected in Anywhere Group’s consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Business Description
The Company reports its operations in the following three business segments (the number of offices and agents are unaudited):
•Anywhere Brands ("Franchise Group"), formerly referred to as Realogy Franchise Group—franchises a portfolio of well-known, industry-leading franchise brokerage brands, including Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate, Century 21®, Coldwell Banker®, Coldwell Banker Commercial®, Corcoran®, ERA® and Sotheby's International Realty®. As of December 31, 2022, the Company's real estate franchise systems and proprietary brands had approximately 337,400 independent sales agents worldwide, including approximately 195,000 independent sales agents operating in the U.S. (which included approximately 59,800 company owned brokerage independent sales agents). As of December 31, 2022, the Company's real estate franchise systems and proprietary brands had approximately 20,500 offices worldwide in 119 countries and territories, including approximately 5,700 brokerage offices in the U.S. (which included approximately 680 company owned brokerage offices). This segment also includes the Company's lead generation activities through Anywhere Leads Group ("Leads Group") and global relocation services operation through Cartus® Relocation Services ("Cartus").
•Anywhere Advisors ("Owned Brokerage Group"), formerly referred to as Realogy Brokerage Group—operates a full-service real estate brokerage business with approximately 680 owned and operated brokerage offices with approximately 59,800 independent sales agents principally under the Coldwell Banker®, Corcoran® and Sotheby’s International Realty® brand names in many of the largest metropolitan areas in the U.S. This segment also includes the Company's share of equity earnings or losses from its minority-owned real estate auction joint venture and former RealSure joint venture.
•Anywhere Integrated Services ("Title Group"), formerly referred to as Realogy Title Group—provides full-service title, escrow and settlement services to consumers, real estate companies, corporations and financial institutions primarily in support of residential real estate transactions. This segment also includes the Company's share of equity earnings or losses from Guaranteed Rate Affinity, its minority-owned mortgage origination joint venture, and from its minority-owned title insurance underwriter joint venture.
Sale of the Title Insurance Underwriter
On March 29, 2022, the Company sold its title insurance underwriter, Title Resources Guaranty Company (the "Title Underwriter") (previously reported in the Title Group reportable segment), to an affiliate of Centerbridge for $210 million (prior to expenses and tax) and a 30% equity stake in the form of common units in a title insurance underwriter joint venture that owns the Title Underwriter (the "Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture"). Upon closing of the transaction, the Company received $208 million of cash and recorded a $90 million investment related to its 30% equity interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture. As a result of the transaction, the Company disposed of $166 million of net assets, including $152 million of cash held as statutory reserves by the Title Underwriter and $32 million of goodwill, and recognized a gain of $131 million, net of fees, recorded in the Other income, net line on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As this transaction did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations or financial results, the Title Underwriter's operations have not been classified as discontinued operations.
In April 2022, the Company sold a portion of its interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture to a third party, reducing the Company's equity stake from 30% to 26%. The sale resulted in a gain of $4 million recorded in the Other income, net line on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Note 4, "Equity Method Investments", for additional information.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
USE OF ESTIMATES
In presenting the consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and related disclosures. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
CONSOLIDATION
The Company consolidates any variable interest entity ("VIE") for which it is the primary beneficiary with a controlling financial interest. Also, the Company consolidates an entity not deemed a VIE if its ownership, direct or indirect, exceeds 50% of the outstanding voting shares of an entity and/or it has the ability to control the financial or operating policies through its voting rights, board representation or other similar rights. For entities where the Company does not have a controlling financial or operating interest, the investments in such entities are accounted for using the equity method or at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, as appropriate. See Note 4, "Equity Method Investments" for discussion.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
See Note 3, "Revenue Recognition", for discussion.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers highly liquid investments with remaining maturities not exceeding three months at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
RESTRICTED CASH
Restricted cash primarily relates to amounts specifically designated as collateral for the repayment of outstanding borrowings under the Company’s securitization facilities. Such amounts approximated $4 million and $8 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company estimates the allowance necessary to provide for uncollectible accounts receivable. The estimate is based on historical experience, combined with a review of current conditions and forecasts of future losses, and includes specific accounts for which payment has become unlikely. The process by which the Company calculates the allowance begins in the individual business units where specific problem accounts are identified and reserved primarily based upon the age profile of the receivables and specific payment issues, combined with reasonable and supportable forecasts of future losses.
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS
Debt issuance costs include costs incurred in connection with obtaining debt and extending existing debt. These financing costs are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount, with the exception of the debt issuance costs related to the Revolving Credit Facility and securitization obligations which are classified as a deferred financing asset within other assets. The debt issuance costs are amortized via the effective interest method and the amortization period is the life of the related debt.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company records derivatives and hedging activities on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. The Company historically used interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to future interest rate volatility associated with its variable rate borrowings. During September 2022, the Company terminated $550 million of its interest rate swaps which had expiration dates of August 2025 and November 2027 and the Company's remaining interest rate swaps, which had a value of $450 million, expired in November 2022. The Company did not elect to utilize hedge accounting for these instruments; therefore, any change in fair value was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 18, "Risk Management and Fair Value of Financial Instruments", for further discussion.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are initially recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, is computed utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements, also recorded as a component of depreciation and amortization, is computed utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated benefit period of the related assets or the lease term, if shorter. Useful lives are 30 years for buildings, up to 20 years for leasehold improvements, and from 3 to 7 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for internal use which commences during the development phase of the project. The Company amortizes software developed or obtained for internal use on a straight-line basis, generally from 1 to 5 years, when such software is ready for use. The net carrying value of software developed or obtained for internal use was $140 million and $126 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
LEASES
See Note 6, "Leases", for discussion.
IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of trademarks acquired in business combinations. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived assets are not amortized but are subject to impairment testing. The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $2,523 million and $639 million, respectively, at December 31, 2022 and are subject to an impairment assessment annually as of October 1, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. The impairment assessment is performed at the reporting unit level which includes Owned Brokerage Group, franchise services (reported within the Franchise Group reportable segment), Title Group and Cartus/Leads Group (includes lead generation and relocation services, both of which are reported within the Franchise Group reportable segment). This assessment compares the carrying value of each reporting unit and the carrying value of each other indefinite lived intangible asset to their respective fair values and, when appropriate the carrying value is reduced to fair value and an impairment charge for the excess is recorded on the "Impairments" line in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In testing goodwill, the fair value of each reporting unit is estimated using the income approach, a discounted cash flow method. For the other indefinite lived intangible assets, fair value is estimated using the relief from royalty method. Management utilizes long-term cash flow forecasts and the Company's annual operating plans adjusted for terminal value assumptions. The fair value of the Company's reporting units and other indefinite lived intangible assets is determined utilizing the best estimate of future revenues, operating expenses including commission expense, market and general
economic conditions, trends in the industry, as well as assumptions that management believes marketplace participants would utilize including discount rates, cost of capital, trademark royalty rates, and long-term growth rates. The trademark royalty rate was determined by reviewing similar trademark agreements with third parties.
Although management believes that assumptions are reasonable, actual results may vary significantly. These impairment assessments involve the use of accounting estimates and assumptions, changes in which could materially impact our financial condition or operating performance if actual results differ from such estimates and assumptions. Furthermore, significant negative industry or economic trends, disruptions to the business, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in use of the assets, a decrease in business results, growth rates that fall below management's assumptions, divestitures, and a sustained decline in the Company's stock price and market capitalization may have a negative effect on the fair values and key valuation assumptions. Such changes could result in changes to management's estimates of the Company's fair value and a material impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets. To address this uncertainty, a sensitivity analysis is performed on key estimates and assumptions.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company performed its annual impairment assessment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. As previously discussed, the Company experienced a decline in transaction volume during the third quarter largely due to rapidly rising mortgage rates, high inflation, reduced affordability, and broader macroeconomic concerns. These challenges within the residential real estate industry continued during the fourth quarter and resulted in lower homesale transaction volume for the brokerage and franchise business and lower referral volume for the leads business. Additionally, industry forecasts now anticipate continued homesale transaction volume declines in 2023. These market conditions as well as an increase in the weighted average cost of capital resulted in the recognition of an impairment of goodwill at the Owned Brokerage Group reporting unit of $280 million, an impairment of goodwill at the Franchise Group segment of $114 million related to the Cartus/Leads Group reporting unit and an impairment of franchise trademarks of $76 million. The results of the Company's annual impairment assessment indicated no other impairment charges were required for the other reporting units or other indefinite-lived intangibles. Management evaluated the effect of lowering the estimated fair value for each of the passing reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets by 10% and determined that no impairment of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles would have been recognized under this evaluation for 2022 with the exception of the title trademark. The fair value of trademarks is determined using the relief from royalty method which is sensitive to fluctuations in projected revenues.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, there was no impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Management evaluated the effect of lowering the estimated fair value for each of the reporting units by 10% and determined that no impairment of goodwill would have been recognized under this evaluation for 2021.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded the following non-cash impairments related to goodwill and intangible assets:
•an impairment of franchise trademarks of $30 million and a goodwill impairment of $413 million related to Owned Brokerage Group in the first quarter of 2020 driven by the impact on future earnings related to the COVID-19 pandemic primarily due to a significant increase in the weighted average cost of capital as a result of the volatility in the capital and debt markets due to COVID-19 and the related lower projected financial results;
•impairment charges of $105 million related to goodwill and $18 million related to customer relationships during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 (while Cartus was held for sale) to reduce the net assets to the estimated proceeds; and
•an additional goodwill impairment charge of $22 million and a trademark impairment charge of $34 million related to Cartus in the fourth quarter of 2020 as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 crisis resulting in lower relocation activity which negatively impacted the operating results of relocation services.
The results of the Company's annual impairment assessment indicated no other impairment charges were required for the other reporting units or other indefinite-lived intangibles during 2020. Management evaluated the effect of lowering the estimated fair value for each of the passing reporting units by 10% and determined that no impairment of goodwill would have been recognized under this evaluation for 2020. Due to the impairments during 2020 for the Franchise Group and Cartus trademarks, there was little to no excess fair value over carrying value as of December 31, 2020.
The impairment charges are recorded on a separate line in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and are non-cash in nature.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its other long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, if circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. This assessment is performed by comparing the respective carrying values of the assets to the current and expected future cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, to be generated from such assets. If such assessment indicates that the carrying value of these assets is not recoverable, then the carrying value of such assets is reduced to fair value through a charge to the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
ADVERTISING EXPENSES
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred. Advertising expenses, recorded within the marketing expense line item on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, were approximately $175 million, $192 million and $157 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
INCOME TAXES
The Company’s provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. These differences are based upon estimated differences between the book and tax basis of the assets and liabilities for the Company. Certain tax assets and liabilities of the Company may be adjusted in connection with the finalization of income tax audits.
The Company’s deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the recorded deferred tax balances will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the Company’s provision for income taxes and increases to the valuation allowance result in additional provision for income taxes.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company grants stock-based awards to certain senior management members, employees and directors including restricted stock units and performance share units. The fair value of restricted stock units and performance share units without a market condition is measured based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date and is recognized as expense over the service period of the award, or when requisite performance metrics or milestones are probable of being achieved. The fair value of awards with a market condition are estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation method and expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur.
ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company reports the results of operations of a business as discontinued operations if a disposal represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results when the business is sold and classified as held for sale, in accordance with the criteria of Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 205 Presentation of Financial Statements and ASC Topic 360 Property, Plant and Equipment. Assets and liabilities of a business classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value, less cost to sell, and depreciation ceases on the date that the held for sale criteria are met. If the carrying amount of the business exceeds its estimated fair value less cost to sell, a loss is recognized. Assets and liabilities related to a business classified as held for sale are segregated in the current and prior balance sheets in the period in which the business is classified as held for sale. The results of discontinued operations are reported in a separate line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations commencing in the period in which the business meets the criteria, and includes any gain or loss recognized on closing, or adjustment of the carrying amount to fair value less cost to sell. Transactions between the businesses held for sale and businesses held and used that are expected to continue to exist after the disposal are not eliminated to appropriately reflect the continuing operations and balances held for sale.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On January 1, 2022, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity ("ASU 2020-06"), which simplifies the accounting for instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible debt. ASU 2020-06 reduces the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock resulting in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract and the interest rate of more convertible debt instruments being closer to the coupon interest rate, as compared with prior guidance. In addition, ASU 2020-06 changes the diluted earnings per share calculation for instruments that may be settled in cash or shares and for convertible instruments requiring the use of the if-converted method. ASU 2020-06 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2021 and permits the use of either the modified retrospective or fully retrospective method of transition.
The Company adopted ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2022 using the modified retrospective method. In accordance with the transition guidance, the Company applied the new guidance to its Exchangeable Senior Notes that were outstanding as of January 1, 2022 with the cumulative effect of adoption recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of Accumulated deficit. Upon adoption, the Company re-combined the liability and equity components associated with the Exchangeable Senior Notes into single liability and derecognized the unamortized debt discount and related equity component. This resulted in an increase to Long-term debt of $65 million, a reduction to Additional paid-in capital of $53 million, net of taxes, and a reduction to Deferred tax liabilities of $17 million. The Company recorded a cumulative effect of adoption adjustment of $5 million, net of taxes, as a reduction to Accumulated deficit on January 1, 2022 related to the reversal of cumulative interest expense recognized for the amortization of the debt discount on its Exchangeable Senior Notes since issuance.
The cumulative effect of adoption on the Company's consolidated balance sheets as of January 1, 2022 is summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2021 | | Impact of the adoption of ASU 2020-06 | | Balance as of January 1, 2022 after the adoption of ASU 2020-06 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | |
Long-term debt | $ | 2,940 | | | $ | 65 | | | $ | 3,005 | |
Deferred income taxes | 353 | | | (17) | | | 336 | |
Total liabilities | 5,018 | | | 48 | | | 5,066 | |
| | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | |
Additional paid-in capital | 4,947 | | | (53) | | | 4,894 | |
Accumulated deficit | (2,712) | | | 5 | | | (2,707) | |
Total stockholders' equity | 2,186 | | | (48) | | | 2,138 | |
Total equity | 2,192 | | | (48) | | | 2,144 | |
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 7,210 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,210 | |
Furthermore, upon adoption, the Company is required to use the "if converted" method when calculating the dilutive impact of convertible debt on earnings per share, however this change did not have a financial impact upon adoption as the Company's Exchangeable Senior Notes have been antidilutive since issuance.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates. Recently issued standards were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.
3. REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized upon the transfer of control of promised services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those services in accordance with the revenue accounting standard. The Company's revenue is disaggregated by major revenue categories on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and further disaggregated by business segment as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, 2022 vs December 31, 2021 |
| Franchise Group | | Owned Brokerage Group | | Title Group | | Corporate and Other | | Total Company |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Gross commission income (a) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,538 | | | $ | 6,118 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,538 | | | $ | 6,118 | |
Service revenue (b) | 260 | | | 227 | | | 22 | | | 29 | | | 511 | | | 924 | | | — | | | — | | | 793 | | | 1,180 | |
Franchise fees (c) | 775 | | | 914 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (358) | | | (393) | | | 417 | | | 521 | |
Other (d) | 110 | | | 108 | | | 46 | | | 42 | | | 19 | | | 28 | | | (15) | | | (14) | | | 160 | | | 164 | |
Net revenues | $ | 1,145 | | | $ | 1,249 | | | $ | 5,606 | | | $ | 6,189 | | | $ | 530 | | | $ | 952 | | | $ | (373) | | | $ | (407) | | | $ | 6,908 | | | $ | 7,983 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, 2021 vs December 31, 2020 |
| Franchise Group | | Owned Brokerage Group | | Title Group | | Corporate and Other | | Total Company |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Gross commission income (a) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,118 | | | $ | 4,669 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,118 | | | $ | 4,669 | |
Service revenue (b) | 227 | | | 243 | | | 29 | | | 26 | | | 924 | | | 714 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,180 | | | 983 | |
Franchise fees (c) | 914 | | | 725 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (393) | | | (306) | | | 521 | | | 419 | |
Other (d) | 108 | | | 91 | | | 42 | | | 47 | | | 28 | | | 22 | | | (14) | | | (10) | | | 164 | | | 150 | |
Net revenues | $ | 1,249 | | | $ | 1,059 | | | $ | 6,189 | | | $ | 4,742 | | | $ | 952 | | | $ | 736 | | | $ | (407) | | | $ | (316) | | | $ | 7,983 | | | $ | 6,221 | |
_______________
(a)Gross commission income at Owned Brokerage Group is recognized at a point in time at the closing of a homesale transaction.
(b)Service revenue primarily consists of title and escrow fees at Title Group and are recognized at a point in time at the closing of a homesale transaction. Service revenue at Franchise Group includes relocation fees, which are recognized as revenue when or as the related performance obligation is satisfied dependent on the type of service performed, and fees related to leads and related services, which are recognized at a point in time at the closing of a homesale transaction or at the completion of the related service.
(c)Franchise fees at Franchise Group primarily include domestic royalties which are recognized at a point in time when the underlying franchisee revenue is earned (upon close of the homesale transaction).
(d)Other revenue is comprised of brand marketing funds received from franchisees at Franchise Group, and other miscellaneous revenues across all of the business segments.
The Company's revenue streams are discussed further below by business segment:
Franchise Group
Domestic Franchisees
In the U.S., the Company employs a direct franchising model whereby it franchises its real estate brands to real estate brokerage businesses that are independently owned and operated. Franchise revenue principally consists of royalty and marketing fees from the Company’s franchisees. The royalty received is primarily based on a gross percentage of the franchisee’s gross commission income. Royalty fees are recorded as the underlying franchisee revenue is earned (upon close of the homesale transaction). Annual volume incentives given to certain franchisees on royalty fees are recorded as a reduction to revenue and are accrued for in relative proportion to the recognition of the underlying gross franchise revenue. Other sales incentives are generally recorded as a reduction to revenue ratably over the related performance period or from the date of issuance through the remaining life of the related franchise agreement. Franchise revenue also includes domestic initial franchise fees which are generally non-refundable and recognized by the Company as revenue upon the execution or opening of a new franchisee office to cover the upfront costs associated with opening the franchisee for business under one of Anywhere’s brands.
The Company also earns marketing fees from its franchisees and utilizes such fees to fund marketing campaigns on behalf of its franchisees. As such, brand marketing fund fees are recorded as deferred revenue when received and recognized
into revenue as earned when these funds are spent on marketing activities. The balance for deferred brand marketing fund fees increased from $25 million at January 1, 2022 to $26 million at December 31, 2022 primarily due to additional fees received from franchisees, offset by amounts recognized into revenue matching expenses for marketing activities during the year ended December 31, 2022.
International Franchisees
The Company utilizes a direct franchising model outside of the U.S. for Sotheby's International Realty® and Corcoran® and, in some cases, Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate. For all other brands, the Company generally employs a master franchise model outside of the U.S., whereby it contracts with a qualified third party to build a franchise network in the country or region in which franchising rights have been granted. Under both the direct and master franchise models outside of the U.S., the Company enters into long-term franchise agreements (generally 25 years in duration) and receives an initial area development fee ("ADF") and ongoing royalties. Ongoing royalties are generally a percentage of the royalties received by the master franchisor from its franchisees with which it contracts and are recorded once the funds are received by the master franchisor. Under the direct franchise model, a royalty fee is paid to the Company on transactions conducted by its franchisees in the applicable country or region. The ADFs that the Company collects are recorded as deferred revenue when received and are classified as current or non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the expected timing of revenue recognition. ADFs are recognized into franchise revenue over the average 25 year life of the related franchise agreement as consideration for the right to access and benefit from Anywhere’s brands. In the event an ADF agreement is terminated prior to the end of its term, the unamortized deferred revenue balance will be recognized into revenue immediately upon termination. The balance for deferred ADFs decreased from $41 million at January 1, 2022 to $40 million at December 31, 2022 due to $3 million of revenues recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022 that were included in the deferred revenue balance at the beginning of the period, partially offset by $2 million of ADFs received during the year ended December 31, 2022.
In addition, the Company recognizes a deferred asset for commissions paid to Anywhere franchise sales employees upon the sale of a new franchise as these are considered costs of obtaining a contract with a customer that are expected to provide benefits to the Company for longer than one year. The Company classifies prepaid commissions as current or non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the expected timing of expense recognition. The amount of commissions is calculated as a percentage of the anticipated gross commission income of the new franchisee or ADF and is amortized over 30 years for domestic franchise agreements or the agreement term for international franchise agreements (generally 25 years). The amount of prepaid commissions was $28 million and $26 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Lead Generation Programs
Through Leads Group, a part of the Franchise Group segment, the Company provides high-quality leads to independent sales agents, including through real estate benefit programs that provide home-buying and selling assistance to customers of lenders, members of organizations such as credit unions and interest groups that have established members who are buying or selling a home as well as to consumers and corporations who have expressed interest in a certain brand, product or service (such as relocation services), including those offered by Anywhere. Leads Group also directs the Company's broker-to-broker business, which generates leads by brokers affiliated with one of its customized agent and brokerage networks, including the Anywhere Leads Network. The networks consist of real estate brokers, including company owned brokerage operations, as well as franchisees and independent real estate brokers who have been approved to become members of one or more networks. Member brokers of the networks receive leads from the Company's real estate benefit programs (including via Cartus) and each other in exchange for a fee paid to Leads Group. Network fees are billed in advance and recognized into revenue on a straight-line basis each month during the membership period. The balance for deferred network fees remained flat at zero at January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 and consisted of $6 million of revenues recognized during the year that were included in the deferred revenue balance at the beginning of the period offset by a $6 million increase related to new network fees.
Cartus® Relocation Services
Through Cartus, a part of the Franchise Group segment, the Company offers a broad range of employee relocation services to clients designed to manage all aspects of transferring their employees ("transferees"). These services include, but are not limited to, homesale assistance, relocation policy counseling and group move management services, expense processing and relocation-related accounting, and visa and immigration support. The Company also arranges household goods moving services and provides support for all aspects of moving a transferee's household goods. There are a number of
different revenue streams associated with relocation services including fees earned from real estate brokers and household goods moving companies that provide services to the transferee which are recognized at a point in time at the completion of services. The Company earns revenues from outsourcing management fees charged to clients that may cover several of the relocation services listed above, according to the clients' specific needs. Outsourcing management fees are recorded as deferred revenue when billed (usually at the start of the relocation) and are recognized as revenue over the average time period required to complete the transferee's move, or a phase of the move that the fee covers, which is typically 3 to 6 months depending on the move type. The balance for deferred outsourcing management fees remained flat at $4 million at January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 due to a $58 million increase primarily related to additions for management fees billed on new relocation files in advance of the Company satisfying its performance obligation, offset by $58 million of revenues recognized during the year as performance obligations were satisfied. Furthermore, Cartus continues to provide value through the generation of leads to real estate agent and brokerage participants in the networks maintained by Leads Group, which drives downstream revenue for our businesses. The Company also earns net interest income which represents interest earned from clients on the funds it advances on behalf of the transferring employee net of costs associated with the securitization obligations used to finance these payments, which is recorded within other revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Owned Brokerage Group
As an owner-operator of real estate brokerages, the Company assists home buyers and sellers in listing, marketing, selling and finding homes. Real estate commissions earned by the Company’s real estate brokerage business are recorded as revenue at a point in time which is upon the closing of a real estate transaction (i.e., purchase or sale of a home). These revenues are referred to as gross commission income. The commissions the Company pays to real estate agents are recognized concurrently with associated revenues and presented as the commission and other agent-related costs line item on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has relationships with developers in select major cities (in particular, New York City) to provide marketing and brokerage services in new developments. New development closings generally have a development period of between 18 and 24 months from contracted date to closing. In some cases, the Company receives advanced commissions which are recorded as deferred revenue when received and recognized as revenue when units within the new development close. The balance of advanced commissions related to developments remained flat at $11 million at January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 due to a $3 million increase related to additional commissions received for new developments, offset by a $3 million decrease as a result of revenues recognized on units closed.
Title Group
The Company provides title, escrow and settlement services to consumers, real estate companies, corporations and financial institutions with many of these services provided in connection with the Company's real estate brokerage and relocation services businesses. These services relate to the closing of home purchases and refinancing of home loans and therefore, title revenues and title and closing service fees are recorded at a point in time which occurs at the time a homesale transaction or refinancing closes.
Deferred Revenue
The following table shows the total change in the Company's contract liabilities related to revenue contracts by reportable segment (as discussed in detail above) for the year ended December 31, 2022: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
| Beginning Balance at January 1, 2022 | | Additions during the period | | Recognized as Revenue during the period | | Ending Balance at December 31, 2022 |
Franchise Group (a) | $ | 79 | | | $ | 190 | | | $ | (189) | | | $ | 80 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 14 | | | 7 | | | (7) | | | 14 | |
Total | $ | 93 | | | $ | 197 | | | $ | (196) | | | $ | 94 | |
_______________
(a)Revenues recognized include intercompany marketing fees paid by Owned Brokerage Group.
The majority of the Company's contracts are transactional in nature or have a duration of one-year or less. Accordingly, the Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected length of one year or less.
4. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
The Company applies the equity method of accounting when it has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of an investee but does not have a controlling financial or operating interest in the joint venture. The Company records its share of the net earnings or losses of its equity method investments on the “Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated entities” line in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Investments not accounted for using the equity method are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income or in the case that an investment does not have readily determinable fair values, at cost minus impairment (if any) plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment.
The Company has various equity method investments which are recorded within other non-current assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company's share of equity earnings or losses related to these investments are included in the financial results of the Title Group and Owned Brokerage Group reportable segments. The Company's equity method investment balances at December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Guaranteed Rate Affinity | $ | 72 | | | $ | 94 | |
Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture | 75 | | | — | |
Other Title Group equity method investments | 10 | | | 8 | |
Total Title Group equity method investments | 157 | | | 102 | |
Owned Brokerage Group equity method investments | 27 | | | 29 | |
Total equity method investments | $ | 184 | | | $ | 131 | |
Guaranteed Rate Affinity, the Company's 49.9% minority-owned mortgage origination joint venture with Guaranteed Rate, Inc., originates and markets its mortgage lending services to the Company's real estate brokerage as well as other real estate brokerage companies across the country. While the Company has certain governance rights, the Company does not have a controlling financial or operating interest in the joint venture. The Company's investment in Guaranteed Rate Affinity had balances of $72 million and $94 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company recorded equity in losses of $22 million, earnings of $49 million and earnings of $126 million related to its investment in Guaranteed Rate Affinity during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company received no cash dividends during the year ended December 31, 2022 and $44 million and $96 million in cash dividends from Guaranteed Rate Affinity during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company’s 26% equity interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture as of December 31, 2022 is accounted for as an equity method investment. While the Company has certain governance rights, the Company does not have a controlling financial or operating interest in the joint venture. In March 2022, the Company recorded a $90 million investment at the closing of the Title Underwriter sale transaction which represented the fair value of the Company's 30% equity interest based upon the agreed upon purchase price. Subsequent to the closing, the Company received a dividend equal to $12 million from the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture. This dividend reduced the Company’s investment balance to $78 million as of March 31, 2022. In April 2022, the Company sold a portion of its interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture to a third party reducing the Company's equity stake from 30% to 26%. The sale resulted in a gain of $4 million recorded in the Other income, net line on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company recorded equity in earnings of $6 million from the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Title Group's various other equity method investments had investment balances totaling $10 million and $8 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company recorded equity earnings from the operations of Title Group's various other title related equity method investments of $5 million, $6 million and $5 million during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company received $3 million, $7 million and $5 million in cash dividends from these equity method investments during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Owned Brokerage Group's equity method investments include its former investment in RealSure, the real estate auction joint venture and other brokerage related investments. RealSure is the Company's 49% owned joint venture with Home Partners of America which was formed in 2020. The Company and Home Partners of America agreed to cease operations of the joint venture in the fourth quarter of 2022 which resulted in a $4 million impairment of the investment. The real estate auction joint venture, the Company's 50% owned unconsolidated joint venture with Sotheby's, was formed in 2021 and
holds an 80% ownership stake in Sotheby's Concierge Auctions, a global luxury real estate auction marketplace that partners with real estate agents to host luxury online auctions for clients. While the Company has certain governance rights over these equity method investments, the Company does not have a controlling financial or operating interest in the joint ventures. These equity method investments had investment balances totaling $27 million and $29 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company recorded equity in losses of $17 million, $7 million and none from the operations of Owned Brokerage Group's equity method investments for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company invested $19 million, $34 million and $2 million of cash into these equity method investments during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, net consisted of: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | $ | 174 | | | $ | 166 | |
Capitalized software | 492 | | | 463 | |
Finance lease assets | 85 | | | 78 | |
Building and leasehold improvements | 290 | | | 295 | |
Land | 3 | | | 3 | |
Gross property and equipment | 1,044 | | | 1,005 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | (727) | | | (695) | |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 317 | | | $ | 310 | |
The Company recorded depreciation expense related to property and equipment of $118 million, $110 million and $109 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
6. LEASES
The Company's lease portfolio consists primarily of office space and equipment. The Company has approximately 1,200 real estate leases with lease terms ranging from less than 1 year to 17 years and includes the Company's brokerage sales offices, regional and branch offices for title and relocation operations, corporate headquarters, regional headquarters, and facilities serving as local administration, training and storage. The Company's brokerage sales offices are generally located in shopping centers and small office parks, typically with lease terms of 1 year to 5 years. In addition, the Company has equipment leases which primarily consist of furniture, computers and other office equipment.
Right-of-use assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. At lease commencement, the Company records a liability for its lease obligation measured at the present value of future lease payments and a right-of-use asset equal to the lease liability adjusted for prepayments and lease incentives. The Company uses its collateralized incremental borrowing rate to calculate the present value of lease liabilities as most of its leases do not provide an implicit rate that is readily determinable. The Company does not recognize a lease obligation and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet for any leases with an initial term of 12 months or less. Some real estate leases include one or more options to renew or terminate a lease. The exercise of a lease renewal or termination option is assessed at commencement of the lease and only reflected in the lease term if the Company is reasonably certain to exercise the option. The Company has lease agreements that contain both lease and non-lease components, such as common area maintenance fees, and has made a policy election to combine both fixed lease and non-lease components in total gross rent for all of its leases. Expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Finance lease assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the underlying asset or the lease term. The interest component of a finance lease is included in interest expense and recognized using the effective interest method over the lease term.
The Company recognizes impairment charges related to the exit and sublease of certain real estate operating leases. As part of the Company's plan to reduce its office footprint costs and centralize certain aspects of its operational support structure as discussed in Note 14, "Restructuring Costs," the Company will incur right-of-use asset impairments.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to the Company's leases was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | December 31, |
Lease Type | | Balance Sheet Classification | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Assets: | | | | | | |
Operating lease assets | | Operating lease assets, net | | $ | 422 | | | $ | 453 | |
Finance lease assets (a) | | Property and equipment, net | | 34 | | | 33 | |
Total lease assets, net | | $ | 456 | | | $ | 486 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Current: | | | | | | |
Operating lease liabilities | | Current portion of operating lease liabilities | | $ | 122 | | | $ | 128 | |
Finance lease liabilities | | Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | 11 | | | 11 | |
Non-current: | | | | | | |
Operating lease liabilities | | Long-term operating lease liabilities | | 371 | | | 417 | |
Finance lease liabilities | | Other non-current liabilities | | 14 | | | 13 | |
Total lease liabilities | | $ | 518 | | | $ | 569 | |
| | | | | | |
Weighted Average Lease Term and Discount Rate | | | | |
Weighted average remaining lease term (years): | | | | |
Operating leases | | 5.3 | | 5.6 |
Finance leases | | 2.9 | | 2.7 |
| | | | | | |
Weighted average discount rate: | | | | |
Operating leases | | 4.3 | % | | 4.2 | % |
Finance leases | | 3.9 | % | | 3.4 | % |
_______________
(a)Finance lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $50 million and $45 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
As of December 31, 2022, maturities of lease liabilities by fiscal year were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maturity of Lease Liabilities | | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases | | Total |
2023 | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 142 | |
2024 | | 120 | | | 8 | | | 128 | |
2025 | | 94 | | | 4 | | | 98 | |
2026 | | 69 | | | 3 | | | 72 | |
2027 | | 46 | | | 1 | | | 47 | |
Thereafter | | 92 | | | — | | | 92 | |
Total lease payments | | 553 | | | 26 | | | 579 | |
Less: Interest | | 60 | | | 1 | | | 61 | |
Present value of lease liabilities | | $ | 493 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 518 | |
Supplemental income statement information related to the Company's leases is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
Lease Costs | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Operating lease costs | | $ | 140 | | | $ | 141 | | | $ | 150 | |
Finance lease costs: | | | | | | |
Amortization of leased assets | | 12 | | | 12 | | | 12 | |
Interest on lease liabilities | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 2 | |
Other lease costs (a) | | 23 | | | 24 | | | 24 | |
Impairment (b) | | 6 | | | 2 | | | 46 | |
Less: Sublease income, gross | | 2 | | | 2 | | | 2 | |
Net lease cost | | $ | 180 | | | $ | 178 | | | $ | 232 | |
_______________
(a)Primarily consists of variable lease costs.
(b)Impairment charges relate to the exit and sublease of certain real estate operating leases. In 2020, the Company impaired or restructured a portion of its corporate headquarters in Madison, New Jersey and the relocation operations' main corporate location in Danbury, Connecticut.
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | | $ | 162 | | | $ | 162 | | | $ | 165 | |
Operating cash flows from finance leases | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 2 | |
Financing cash flows from finance leases | | 13 | | | 13 | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | |
Supplemental non-cash information: | | | | | | |
Lease assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | | | | | | |
Operating leases | | $ | 92 | | | $ | 134 | | | $ | 103 | |
Finance leases | | 14 | | | 6 | | | 11 | |
7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangibles
During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company performed its impairment assessment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. This assessment resulted in the recognition of an impairment of goodwill at the Owned Brokerage Group reporting unit of $280 million, an impairment of goodwill at the Franchise Group segment of $114 million related to the Cartus/Leads Group reporting unit and an impairment of franchise trademarks of $76 million. See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets", for additional information.
Goodwill
Goodwill by reportable segment and changes in the carrying amount are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Franchise Group | | Owned Brokerage Group | | Title Group | | Total Company |
Balance at January 1, 2020 | $ | 2,636 | | | $ | 669 | | | $ | 155 | | | $ | 3,460 | |
Goodwill acquired | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Goodwill reduction for sale of a business | — | | | (11) | | | — | | | (11) | |
Impairment (a) | (127) | | | (413) | | | — | | | (540) | |
Balance at December 31, 2020 | 2,509 | | | 245 | | | 156 | | | 2,910 | |
Goodwill acquired (b) | — | | | 24 | | | 2 | | | 26 | |
Goodwill reduction for sale of business (c) | (3) | | | (10) | | | — | | | (13) | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | 2,506 | | | 259 | | | 158 | | | 2,923 | |
Goodwill acquired (d) | — | | | 21 | | | 5 | | | 26 | |
Goodwill reduction for sale of a business (e) | — | | | — | | | (32) | | | (32) | |
Impairment (f) | (114) | | | (280) | | | — | | | (394) | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 2,392 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 2,523 | |
Goodwill and accumulated impairment summary: | | | | | | |
Gross goodwill | $ | 3,953 | | | $ | 1,088 | | | $ | 455 | | | $ | 5,496 | |
Accumulated impairments (g) | (1,561) | | | (1,088) | | | (324) | | | (2,973) | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 2,392 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 2,523 | |
_______________
(a)During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charges of $413 million related to Owned Brokerage Group and $127 million at Franchise Group which related to $105 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 (while Cartus was held for sale) to reduce the net assets to the estimated proceeds and an additional goodwill impairment charge of $22 million during the fourth quarter of 2020 related to Cartus.
(b)Goodwill acquired during the year ended December 31, 2021 relates to the acquisition of three real estate brokerage operations and one title and settlement operation.
(c)Goodwill reduction during the year ended December 31, 2021 relates to the sale of a relocation-related business during the first quarter of 2021 and the sale of a business at Owned Brokerage Group during the second quarter of 2021.
(d)Goodwill acquired during the year ended December 31, 2022 relates to the acquisition of four real estate brokerage operations and two title and settlement operations.
(e)Goodwill reduction during the year ended December 31, 2022 relates to the sale of the Title Underwriter during the first quarter of 2022 (see Note 1, "Basis of Presentation", for a description of the transaction).
(f)During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $280 million related to Owned Brokerage Group reporting unit and a goodwill impairment charge of $114 million related to the Cartus/Leads Group reporting unit which is reported within the Franchise Group reportable segment.
(g)Includes impairment charges which reduced goodwill by $394 million during 2022, $540 million during 2020, $253 million during 2019, $1,279 million during 2008 and $507 million during 2007.
Brokerage Acquisitions
None of the acquisitions were significant to the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows individually or in the aggregate.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company acquired four real estate brokerage operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, Owned Brokerage Group, for aggregate cash consideration of $16 million and established $11 million of contingent consideration. These acquisitions resulted in goodwill of $21 million, other intangibles of $6 million, other assets of $26 million and other liabilities of $26 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company acquired three real estate brokerage operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, Owned Brokerage Group, for aggregate cash consideration of $26 million and established $6 million of contingent consideration. These acquisitions resulted in goodwill of $24 million, trademarks of $2 million, other intangibles of $4 million, other assets of $12 million and other liabilities of $10 million.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2022 | | As of December 31, 2021 |
| Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Amortizable—Franchise agreements (a) | $ | 2,010 | | | $ | 1,056 | | | $ | 954 | | | $ | 2,010 | | | $ | 989 | | | $ | 1,021 | |
Indefinite life—Trademarks (b) | $ | 611 | | | | | $ | 611 | | | $ | 687 | | | | | $ | 687 | |
Other Intangibles | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortizable—License agreements (c) | $ | 45 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 31 | |
Amortizable—Customer relationships (d) | 456 | | | 366 | | | 90 | | | 456 | | | 345 | | | 111 | |
Indefinite life—Title plant shares (e) | 28 | | | | | 28 | | | 25 | | | | | 25 | |
Amortizable—Other (f) | 11 | | | 9 | | | 2 | | | 16 | | | 12 | | | 4 | |
Total Other Intangibles | $ | 540 | | | $ | 390 | | | $ | 150 | | | $ | 542 | | | $ | 371 | | | $ | 171 | |
_______________
(a)Generally amortized over a period of 30 years.
(b)Primarily related to real estate franchise, title and relocation trademarks which are expected to generate future cash flows for an indefinite period of time. Franchise trademarks were impaired by $76 million during the fourth quarter of 2022.
(c)Relates to the Sotheby’s International Realty® and Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate agreements which are being amortized over 50 years (the contractual term of the license agreements).
(d)Relates to the customer relationships at Franchise Group, Title Group and Owned Brokerage Group. These relationships are being amortized over a period of 7 to 20 years.
(e)Ownership in a title plant is required to transact title insurance in certain states. The Company expects to generate future cash flows for an indefinite period of time.
(f)Consists of covenants not to compete which are amortized over their contract lives and other intangibles which are generally amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 5 years.
Intangible asset amortization expense is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchise agreements | $ | 67 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 67 | |
License agreements | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Customer relationships | 21 | | | 22 | | | 5 | |
Other | 7 | | | 4 | | | 4 | |
Total | $ | 96 | | | $ | 94 | | | $ | 77 | |
Based on the Company’s amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2022, the Company expects related amortization expense to be approximately $90 million, $89 million, $89 million, $89 million, $74 million and $645 million in 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and thereafter, respectively.
8. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS AND ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current assets consisted of: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Prepaid contracts and other prepaid expenses | $ | 81 | | | $ | 65 | |
Prepaid agent incentives | 55 | | | 42 | |
Franchisee sales incentives | 30 | | | 26 | |
Other | 39 | | | 50 | |
Total other current assets | $ | 205 | | | $ | 183 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Accrued payroll and related employee costs | $ | 110 | | | $ | 284 | |
Advances from clients | 15 | | | 31 | |
Accrued volume incentives | 39 | | | 60 | |
Accrued commissions | 44 | | | 49 | |
Restructuring accruals | 14 | | | 10 | |
Deferred income | 62 | | | 59 | |
Accrued interest | 40 | | | 42 | |
Current portion of finance lease liabilities | 11 | | | 11 | |
Due to former parent | 20 | | | 19 | |
Other | 115 | | | 101 | |
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 470 | | | $ | 666 | |
9. SHORT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Total indebtedness is as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 350 | | | $ | — | |
Extended Term Loan A | 221 | | | 231 | |
7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes | — | | | 542 | |
4.875% Senior Notes | — | | | 406 | |
9.375% Senior Notes | — | | | 545 | |
5.75% Senior Notes | 899 | | | 898 | |
5.25% Senior Notes | 985 | | | — | |
0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes | 394 | | | 328 | |
Total Short-Term & Long-Term Debt | $ | 2,849 | | | $ | 2,950 | |
Securitization Obligations: | | | |
Apple Ridge Funding LLC | $ | 163 | | | $ | 116 | |
Cartus Financing Limited | — | | | 2 | |
Total Securitization Obligations | $ | 163 | | | $ | 118 | |
Indebtedness Table
As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s borrowing arrangements were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest Rate | | Expiration Date | | Principal Amount | | Unamortized Discount (Premium) and Debt Issuance Costs | | Net Amount |
Revolving Credit Facility (1) | (2) | | July 2027 (2) | | $ | 350 | | | $ * | | $ | 350 | |
Extended Term Loan A | (2) | | February 2025 | | 222 | | | 1 | | | 221 | |
Senior Notes (3) | 5.75% | | January 2029 | | 900 | | | 1 | | | 899 | |
Senior Notes (3) | 5.25% | | April 2030 | | 1,000 | | | 15 | | | 985 | |
Exchangeable Senior Notes (4) | 0.25% | | June 2026 | | 403 | | | 9 | | | 394 | |
Total Short-Term & Long-Term Debt | $ | 2,875 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 2,849 | |
Securitization obligations: (5) | | | | | | | | | |
Apple Ridge Funding LLC | | June 2023 | | $ | 163 | | | $ * | | $ | 163 | |
_______________
*The debt issuance costs related to our Revolving Credit Facility and securitization obligations are classified as a deferred financing asset within other assets.
(1)As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $1,100 million of borrowing capacity under its Revolving Credit Facility, with $750 million of available capacity. As of December 31, 2022, there were $350 million outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and $42 million of outstanding undrawn letters of credit. On February 22, 2023, the Company had $384 million outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and $35 million of outstanding undrawn letters of credit.
(2)See below under the header "Senior Secured Credit Agreement and Term Loan A Agreement" for additional information.
(3)See below under the header "Unsecured Notes" for additional information.
(4)See below under the header "Exchangeable Senior Notes" for additional information and Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements", related to the January 1, 2022 adoption of the new standard on "Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity".
(5)See below under the header "Securitization Obligations" for additional information.
Maturities Table
As of December 31, 2022, the combined aggregate amount of maturities for long-term borrowings for each of the next five years is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Year | | Amount |
2023 (a) | | $ | 366 | |
2024 | | 22 | |
2025 | | 184 | |
2026 | | 403 | |
2027 | | — | |
_______________
(a)The current portion of long-term debt of $366 million shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of $350 million outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2022 and four quarters of 2023 amortization payments totaling $16 million for the Extended Term Loan A. Outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are classified on the balance sheet as current due to the revolving nature and terms and conditions of the facilities.
Senior Secured Credit Agreement and Term Loan A Agreement
The Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 5, 2013 (as amended, amended and restated, modified or supplemented from time to time, the "Senior Secured Credit Agreement") governs its senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") and, until its repayment in full in September 2021, its term loan B facility (the "Term Loan B Facility", and collectively with the Revolving Credit Facility, the "Senior Secured Credit Facility") and the Company's Term Loan A Agreement dated as of October 23, 2015 (as amended, amended and restated, modified or supplemented from time to time, the "Term Loan A Agreement") governs its senior secured term loan A credit facility (the "Term Loan A Facility").
In July 2022, Anywhere Group entered into an amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Agreement that terminated the revolving credit commitments due February 2023, replaced LIBOR with a Term SOFR-based rate as the applicable benchmark for the Revolving Credit Facility, and extended the maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility to July 2027, subject to certain earlier springing maturity dates. The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility may spring forward to an earlier date as follows: (i) if on or before March 16, 2026, the 0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes have not been extended, refinanced or replaced to have a maturity date after October 26, 2027 (or are not otherwise discharged, defeased or repaid by March 16, 2026), the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility will be March 16, 2026 and (ii) if on or before February 8, 2025, the "term A loans" under the Term Loan A Agreement have not been extended, refinanced or replaced to have a maturity date after October 26, 2027 (or are not otherwise repaid by February 8, 2025), the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility will be February 8, 2025.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
The Senior Secured Credit Facility includes a $1,100 million Revolving Credit Facility which includes a $150 million letter of credit sub-facility.
The interest rate with respect to revolving loans under the Revolving Credit Facility is based on, at Anywhere Group's option, a term SOFR-based rate including a 10 basis point credit spread adjustment or JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s prime rate ("ABR") plus (in each case) an additional margin subject to the following adjustments based on the Company’s then current senior secured leverage ratio:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Secured Leverage Ratio | | Applicable SOFR Margin | | Applicable ABR Margin |
Greater than 3.50 to 1.00 | | 2.50% | | 1.50% |
Less than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00 but greater than or equal to 2.50 to 1.00 | | 2.25% | | 1.25% |
Less than 2.50 to 1.00 but greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 | | 2.00% | | 1.00% |
Less than 2.00 to 1.00 | | 1.75% | | 0.75% |
Based on the previous quarter's senior secured leverage ratio, the SOFR margin was 1.75% and the ABR margin was 0.75% for the three months ended December 31, 2022.
The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Agreement are secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all of the assets of Anywhere Group, Anywhere Intermediate and all of their domestic subsidiaries, other than certain excluded subsidiaries and subject to certain exceptions.
The Senior Secured Credit Agreement contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants as well as a financial covenant that Anywhere Group maintain (so long as commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility are outstanding) a maximum permitted senior secured leverage ratio, not to exceed 4.75 to 1.00. The leverage ratio is tested quarterly regardless of the amount of borrowings outstanding and letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility at the testing date. Total senior secured net debt does not include the Apple Ridge securitization obligations or our unsecured indebtedness, including the Unsecured Notes and the Exchangeable Senior Notes. At December 31, 2022, Anywhere Group was in compliance with the senior secured leverage ratio covenant.
Term Loan A Facility
The Term Loan A Facility includes the outstanding loans under the Term Loan A Facility (the "Extended Term Loan A") due February 2025. Until its repayment in full in September 2021, the Term Loan A Facility also included the Non-extended Term Loan A due February 2023. The Extended Term Loan A provides for quarterly amortization based on a percentage of the original principal amount of $237 million, which commenced on June 30, 2021, as follows: 0.625% per quarter from June 30, 2021 to March 31, 2022; 1.25% per quarter from June 30, 2022 to March 31, 2023; 1.875% per quarter from June 30, 2023 to March 31, 2024; and 2.50% per quarter for periods ending on or after June 30, 2024, with the balance of the Extended Term Loan A due at maturity on February 8, 2025.
The interest rate with respect to the Term Loan A Facility is based on, at Anywhere Group's option, adjusted LIBOR or ABR, plus (in each case) an additional margin subject to adjustment based on the Company’s then current senior secured leverage ratio:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Secured Leverage Ratio | | Applicable LIBOR Margin | | Applicable ABR Margin |
Greater than 3.50 to 1.00 | | 2.50% | | 1.50% |
Less than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00 but greater than or equal to 2.50 to 1.00 | | 2.25% | | 1.25% |
Less than 2.50 to 1.00 but greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 | | 2.00% | | 1.00% |
Less than 2.00 to 1.00 | | 1.75% | | 0.75% |
Based on the previous quarter's senior secured leverage ratio, the LIBOR margin was 1.75% and the ABR margin was 0.75% for the three months ended December 31, 2022.
The Term Loan A Agreement contains covenants that are substantially similar to those in the Senior Secured Credit Agreement.
Repurchase and Redemption of 4.875% Senior Notes
During the second and third quarters of 2022, the Company used cash on hand to repurchase $67 million in principal amount of its 4.875% Senior Notes in open market purchases approximately at par value plus accrued interest to the repurchase date. In the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding $340 million 4.875% Senior Notes utilizing borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facility, together with cash on hand. The 4.875% Senior Notes were paid at a redemption price of 100% plus the applicable "make whole" premium (as determined pursuant to the indenture governing the 4.875% Senior Notes), together with accrued interest to the redemption date. The 4.875% Senior Notes were scheduled to mature on June 1, 2023 and interest was payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
5.25% Senior Notes Issuance and Redemption of 9.375% Senior Notes and 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes
In the first quarter of 2022, the Company redeemed in full the outstanding 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and 9.375% Senior Notes using net proceeds, together with cash on hand, from its issuance of 5.25% Senior Notes. The 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and 9.375% Senior Notes were each paid at a redemption price of 100% plus the applicable "make whole" premium (as determined pursuant to the indenture governing the 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes or 9.375% Senior Notes, as applicable), together with accrued interest to the redemption date. The 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes were scheduled to mature on June 15, 2025 and interest was payable semiannually on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. The 9.375% Senior Notes were scheduled to mature on April 1, 2027 and interest was payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
Unsecured Notes
The 5.75% Senior Notes and 5.25% Senior Notes (collectively the "Unsecured Notes") are unsecured senior obligations of Anywhere Group. The 5.75% Senior Notes mature on January 15, 2029 with interest on such notes payable each year semiannually on January 15 and July 15. The 5.25% Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2030 with interest on such notes payable each year semiannually on April 15 and October 15 which commenced April 15, 2022.
The Company may redeem all or a portion of the 5.75% Senior Notes or 5.25% Senior Notes, as applicable, at the redemption price set forth in the applicable indenture governing such notes, commencing on January 15, 2024 and April 15, 2025, respectively. Prior to those dates, the Company may redeem the applicable notes at its option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of such notes redeemed plus a "make-whole" premium as set forth in the applicable indenture governing such notes. In addition, prior to the dates noted above, the Company may redeem up to 40% of the notes from the proceeds of certain equity offerings as set forth in the applicable indenture governing such notes.
The Unsecured Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each domestic subsidiary of Anywhere Group that is a guarantor under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, Term Loan A Facility and Anywhere Group's outstanding debt securities and are guaranteed by Anywhere Holdings on an unsecured senior subordinated basis.
The indentures governing the Unsecured Notes contain various negative covenants that limit Anywhere Group's and its restricted subsidiaries' ability to take certain actions, which covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. These covenants include limitations on Anywhere Group's and its restricted subsidiaries' ability to (a) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, or issue disqualified stock or preferred stock, (b) pay dividends or make distributions to their stockholders, (c) repurchase or redeem capital stock, (d) make investments or acquisitions, (e) incur restrictions on the ability of certain of their subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make other payments to Anywhere Group, (f) enter into transactions with affiliates, (g) create liens, (h) merge or consolidate with other companies or transfer all or substantially all of their assets, (i) transfer or sell assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries and (j) prepay, redeem or repurchase debt that is subordinated in right of payment to the Unsecured Notes.
In particular, under the Unsecured Notes:
•the cumulative credit basket is not available to repurchase shares to the extent the consolidated leverage ratio is equal to or greater than 4.0 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis giving effect to such repurchase;
•the consolidated leverage ratio must be less than 3.0 to 1.0 to use the unlimited general restricted payment basket; and
•a restricted payment basket is available for up to $45 million of dividends per calendar year (with any actual dividends deducted from the available cumulative credit basket).
The consolidated leverage ratio is measured by dividing Anywhere Group's total net debt (excluding securitizations) by the trailing twelve-month EBITDA. EBITDA, as defined in the applicable indentures governing the Unsecured Notes, is substantially similar to EBITDA calculated on a Pro Forma Basis, as those terms are defined in the Senior Secured Credit Agreement. Net debt under the indenture governing the Unsecured Notes is Anywhere Group's total indebtedness (excluding securitizations) less (i) its cash and cash equivalents in excess of restricted cash and (ii) a $200 million seasonality adjustment permitted when measuring the ratio on a date during the period of March 1 to May 31.
Exchangeable Senior Notes
In June 2021, Anywhere Group issued an aggregate principal amount of $403 million of 0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2026. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to pay the cost of the exchangeable note hedge transactions described below (with such cost partially offset by the proceeds to the Company from the sale of the warrants pursuant to the warrant transactions described below).
The Exchangeable Senior Notes are unsecured senior obligations of Anywhere Group that mature on June 15, 2026. Interest on the Exchangeable Senior Notes is payable each year semiannually on June 15 and December 15.
The Exchangeable Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each domestic subsidiary of Anywhere Group that is a guarantor under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, Term Loan A Facility and Anywhere Group's outstanding debt securities and are guaranteed by Anywhere on an unsecured senior subordinated basis.
Before March 15, 2026, noteholders will have the right to exchange their Exchangeable Senior Notes upon the occurrence of certain events described in the indenture governing the notes. On or after March 15, 2026, noteholders may exchange their Exchangeable Senior Notes at any time at their election until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately before the maturity date of the notes.
Upon exchange, Anywhere Group will pay cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the Exchangeable Senior Notes to be exchanged and pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at Anywhere Group's election, in respect of the remainder, if any, of its exchange obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the Exchangeable Senior Notes being exchanged.
The initial exchange rate for Exchangeable Senior Notes is 40.8397 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (which represents an initial exchange price of approximately $24.49 per share of the Company’s common stock). The exchange rate and exchange price of the Exchangeable Senior Notes are subject to customary adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events. In addition, if a “Make-Whole Fundamental Change” (as defined in the indenture governing the Exchangeable Senior Notes) occurs, then the exchange rate of the Exchangeable Senior Notes will, in certain circumstances, be increased for a specified period of time. Initially, a maximum of approximately 23,013,139 shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued upon the exchange of the Exchangeable Senior Notes, based on the initial maximum exchange rate of 57.1755 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustment provisions.
The Exchangeable Senior Notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part (subject to a partial redemption limitation described in the indenture governing the notes), at Anywhere Group's option at any time, and from time to time, on or after June 20, 2024 and on or before the 30th scheduled trading day immediately before the maturity date, at a cash redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Exchangeable Senior Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date, but only if the last reported sale price per share of the Company’s common stock exceeds 130% of the exchange price on (1) each of at least 20 trading days, whether or not consecutive, during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the trading day immediately before the date it sends the related redemption notice; and (2) the trading day immediately before the date it sends such notice. In addition, calling any Exchangeable Senior Notes for redemption will constitute a Make-Whole Fundamental Change with respect to that note, in which case the exchange rate applicable to the exchange of that note will be increased in certain circumstances if it is exchanged with an exchange date occurring during the period from, and including, the date Anywhere Group sends the redemption notice to, and including, the second business day immediately before the related redemption date.
If certain corporate events that constitute a "Fundamental Change" (as defined in the indenture governing the Exchangeable Senior Notes) of the Company occur, then noteholders may require Anywhere Group to repurchase their Exchangeable Senior Notes at a cash repurchase price equal to the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. The definition of Fundamental Change includes, among other things, certain business combination transactions involving the Company and certain de-listing events with respect to the Company’s common stock.
The indenture governing the Exchangeable Senior Notes also provides for events of default which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal of and accrued interest on the Exchangeable Senior Notes to become or to be declared due and payable.
Under the accounting standards applicable at the time of issuance, exchangeable debt instruments that may be settled in cash were required to be separated into liability and equity components. The allocation to the liability component was based on the fair value of a similar instrument that does not contain an equity conversion option. Based on this debt-to-equity ratio, debt issuance costs are then allocated to the liability and equity components in a similar manner. Accordingly, at issuance on June 2, 2021, the Company allocated $319 million to the debt liability and $53 million to additional paid in capital. The difference between the principal amount of the Exchangeable Senior Notes and the liability component, inclusive of issuance costs, represented the debt discount, which the Company amortized to interest expense over the term of the Exchangeable Senior Notes using an effective interest rate of 4.375%. As a result, the Company recognized non-cash interest expense of $8 million related to the Exchangeable Senior Notes during 2021.
Upon the adoption of ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2022, the Company was required to account for its Exchangeable Senior Notes as a single liability resulting in the recombination of the debt liability and equity components. As a result, the Company derecognized the unamortized debt discount and related equity component associated with its Exchangeable Senior Notes resulting in an increase to Long-term debt of $65 million, a reduction to Additional paid-in capital of
$53 million, net of taxes, and a reduction to Deferred tax liabilities of $17 million. The Company recorded a cumulative effect of adoption adjustment of $5 million, net of taxes, as a reduction to Accumulated deficit on January 1, 2022 related to the reversal of cumulative interest expense recognized for the amortization of the debt discount on its Exchangeable Senior Notes since issuance. See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements," for additional information.
Exchangeable Note Hedge and Warrant Transactions
In connection with the pricing of the Exchangeable Senior Notes (and with the exercise by the initial purchasers of the notes to purchase additional notes), Anywhere Group entered into exchangeable note hedge transactions with certain counterparties (the "Option Counterparties"). The exchangeable note hedge transactions cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the Exchangeable Senior Notes, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock underlying the Notes. The total cost of such exchangeable note hedge transactions was $67 million.
Concurrently with Anywhere Group entering into the exchangeable note hedge transactions, the Company entered into warrant transactions with the Option Counterparties whereby the Company sold to the Option Counterparties warrants to purchase, subject to customary adjustments, up to the same number of shares of the Company’s common stock. The initial strike price of the warrant transactions is $30.6075 per share. The Company received $46 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these warrant transactions.
Taken together, the purchase of such exchangeable note hedges and the sale of such warrants are intended to offset (in whole or in part) any potential dilution and/or cash payments upon the exchange of the Exchangeable Senior Notes, and to effectively increase the overall exchange price from $24.49 to $30.6075 per share.
At issuance, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability of $20 million related to the Exchangeable Senior Notes debt discount and a deferred tax asset of $18 million related to the exchangeable note hedge transactions. The deferred tax liability and deferred tax asset were recorded net within deferred income taxes in the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon issuance. The deferred tax liability related to the Exchangeable Senior Notes debt discount was reversed on January 1, 2022 upon the adoption of ASU 2020-06 as discussed above.
Securitization Obligations
Anywhere Group has secured obligations through Apple Ridge Funding LLC under a securitization program which expires in June 2023. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $200 million of borrowing capacity under the Apple Ridge Funding LLC securitization program with $163 million being utilized leaving $37 million of available capacity subject to maintaining sufficient relocation related assets to collateralize the securitization obligation.
Anywhere Group, through a special purpose entity known as Cartus Financing Limited, also had securitization agreements providing for a revolving loan facility and a working capital facility that expired on September 30, 2022.
The Apple Ridge entities are consolidated special purpose entities that are utilized to securitize relocation receivables and related assets. These assets are generated from advancing funds on behalf of clients of Anywhere Group’s relocation operations in order to facilitate the relocation of their employees. Assets of these special purpose entities are not available to pay Anywhere Group’s general obligations. Under the Apple Ridge program, provided no termination or amortization event has occurred, any new receivables generated under the designated relocation management agreements are sold into the securitization program and as new eligible relocation management agreements are entered into, the new agreements are designated to the program.
The Apple Ridge program has restrictive covenants and trigger events, the occurrence of which could restrict our ability to access new or existing funding under this facility or result in termination of the facility, either of which would adversely affect the operation of the Company's relocation services.
Certain of the funds that Anywhere Group receives from relocation receivables and related assets are required to be utilized to repay securitization obligations. These obligations are collateralized by $206 million and $132 million of underlying relocation receivables and other related relocation assets at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Substantially all relocation related assets are realized in less than twelve months from the transaction date. Accordingly, all of Anywhere Group's securitization obligations are classified as current in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Interest incurred in connection with borrowings under these facilities amounted to $7 million and $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. This interest is recorded within net revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations as related borrowings are utilized to fund Anywhere Group's relocation operations where interest is generally earned on such assets. These securitization obligations represent floating rate debt for which the average weighted interest rate was 4.2% and 3.1% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Loss on the Early Extinguishment of Debt and Write-Off of Financing Costs
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $96 million, as a result of the refinancing transactions during 2022, which includes $80 million related to the make-whole premiums paid in connection with the early redemption of the 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and 9.375% Senior Notes.
As a result of the refinancing transactions in January and February 2021, the pay down of $150 million of outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan B Facility in April 2021 and the pay downs of the Non-extended Term Loan A and the Term Loan B Facility in September 2021, the Company recorded losses on the early extinguishment of debt of $21 million and wrote off certain financing costs of $1 million to interest expense, during the year ended December 31, 2021.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $8 million as a result of the refinancing transactions in June 2020.
10. FRANCHISING AND MARKETING ACTIVITIES
Domestic franchisee agreements generally require the franchisee to pay the Company an initial franchise fee for the franchisee's principal office plus a royalty fee that is a percentage of gross commission income, if any, earned by the franchisee. Franchisee fees can be structured in numerous ways. The Company utilizes multiple franchise fee models, including: (i) volume-based incentive (under which royalty fee rate is subject to reduction based on volume incentives); (ii) flat percentage royalty fee (under which the franchisee pays a fixed percentage of their commission income); (iii) capped fee (under which the franchisee pays a royalty fee capped at a set amount per independent sales agents per year); and (iv) tiered royalty fee (under which the franchisee pays a percentage of their gross commission income as a royalty fee). The volume incentives currently in effect vary for each eligible franchisee for which the Company provides a detailed table that describes the gross revenue thresholds required to achieve a volume incentive and the corresponding incentive amounts and are subject to change.
Domestic initial franchise fees and international area development fees were $4 million, $5 million and $7 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Franchise royalty revenue is recorded net of annual volume incentives provided to real estate franchisees of $61 million, $87 million and $63 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company’s wholly-owned real estate brokerage services segment, Owned Brokerage Group, pays royalties to the Company’s franchise business; however, such amounts are eliminated in consolidation. Owned Brokerage Group paid royalties to Franchise Group of $358 million, $393 million and $306 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Marketing fees are generally paid by the Company’s real estate franchisees and are generally calculated based on a specified percentage of gross closed commissions earned on real estate transactions, and may be subject to certain minimum and maximum payments. Brand marketing fund revenue was $89 million, $92 million and $69 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which included marketing fees paid to Franchise Group from Owned Brokerage Group of $15 million, $14 million and $10 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As provided for in the franchise agreements and generally at the Company’s discretion, all of these fees are to be expended for marketing purposes.
The number of franchised and company owned offices in operation are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Unaudited) As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchised (domestic and international): | | | | | |
Century 21® | 13,611 | | | 14,246 | | | 13,222 | |
ERA® | 2,407 | | | 2,355 | | | 2,318 | |
Coldwell Banker® | 2,100 | | | 2,071 | | | 2,263 | |
Coldwell Banker Commercial® | 171 | | | 164 | | | 168 | |
Sotheby’s International Realty® | 1,035 | | | 986 | | | 952 | |
Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate | 418 | | | 411 | | | 389 | |
Corcoran® | 82 | | | 122 | | | 74 | |
Total Franchised | 19,824 | | | 20,355 | | | 19,386 | |
Company owned: | | | | | |
Coldwell Banker® | 606 | | | 605 | | | 605 | |
Sotheby’s International Realty® | 44 | | | 41 | | | 39 | |
Corcoran® | 29 | | | 29 | | | 29 | |
Total Company Owned | 679 | | | 675 | | | 673 | |
The number of franchised and company owned offices (in the aggregate) changed as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Unaudited) For the Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchised (domestic and international): | | | | | |
Beginning balance | 20,355 | | | 19,386 | | | 17,776 | |
Additions | 548 | | | 1,583 | | | 2,109 | |
Terminations | (1,079) | | | (614) | | | (499) | |
Ending balance | 19,824 | | | 20,355 | | | 19,386 | |
Company owned: | | | | | |
Beginning balance | 675 | | | 673 | | | 713 | |
Additions | 46 | | | 25 | | | 5 | |
Closures | (42) | | | (23) | | | (45) | |
Ending balance | 679 | | | 675 | | | 673 | |
As of December 31, 2022, there were an insignificant number of franchise agreements that were executed for which offices are not yet operating. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, there were an insignificant number of franchise agreements pending termination.
In order to assist franchisees in converting to one of the Company’s brands or as an incentive to renew their franchise agreement, the Company may at its discretion, provide incentives, primarily in the form of conversion notes or other note-backed funding. Provided the franchisee meets certain minimum annual revenue thresholds during the term of the notes and is in compliance with the terms of the franchise agreement, the amount of the note is forgiven annually in equal ratable amounts generally over the life of the franchise agreement. If the revenue performance thresholds are not met or the franchise agreement terminates, franchisees may be required to repay a portion of the outstanding notes. The amount of such franchisee conversion notes or other note-backed funding was $182 million and $164 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These notes are principally classified within other non-current assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recorded a contra-revenue in the statement of operations related to the forgiveness and impairment of these notes and other sales incentives of $45 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and $32 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN
The Company’s defined benefit pension plan was closed to new entrants as of July 1, 1997 and existing participants do not accrue any additional benefits. The net periodic pension benefit for 2022 was $1 million and was comprised of interest cost of approximately $4 million and the amortization of the actuarial net loss of $2 million, offset by a benefit of $7 million for the expected return on assets. The net periodic pension cost for 2021 was zero and was comprised of interest cost of approximately $3 million and the amortization of the actuarial net loss of $3 million, offset by a benefit of $6 million for the expected return on assets.
At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the accumulated benefit obligation of this plan was $107 million and $137 million, respectively, and the fair value of the plan assets were $90 million and $116 million, respectively, resulting in an unfunded accumulated benefit obligation of $17 million and $21 million, respectively, which is recorded in Other current and non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Estimated future benefit payments from the plan as of December 31, 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Year | | Amount |
2023 | | $ | 9 | |
2024 | | 9 | |
2025 | | 9 | |
2026 | | 9 | |
2027 | | 9 | |
2028 through 2032 | | 42 | |
The minimum funding required during 2023 is estimated to be $1 million.
The following table presents the fair values of plan assets by category as of December 31, 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset Category | | Quoted Price in Active Market for Identical Assets (Level I) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level II) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level III) | | Total |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Equity securities | | — | | | 50 | | | — | | | 50 | |
Fixed income securities | | — | | | 39 | | | — | | | 39 | |
Total | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 90 | |
The following table presents the fair values of plan assets by category as of December 31, 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset Category | | Quoted Price in Active Market for Identical Assets (Level I) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level II) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level III) | | Total |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3 | |
Equity securities | | — | | | 64 | | | — | | | 64 | |
Fixed income securities | | — | | | 49 | | | — | | | 49 | |
Total | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 113 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 116 | |
OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company also maintains post-retirement health and welfare plans for certain subsidiaries and a non-qualified pension plan for certain individuals. The related projected benefit obligation for these plans accrued on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets (primarily within other non-current liabilities) was $3 million and $4 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SAVINGS PLAN
The Company sponsors a defined contribution savings plan that provides certain of its eligible employees an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement and has a Company match for a portion of the contributions made by participating employees. The Company’s cost for contributions to this plan was $22 million, $20 million and $10 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
12. INCOME TAXES
The components of pretax income for domestic and foreign operations consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Domestic | $ | (368) | | | $ | 486 | | | $ | (449) | |
Foreign | 17 | | | (3) | | | (11) | |
Pretax (loss) income | $ | (351) | | | $ | 483 | | | $ | (460) | |
The components of income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Current: | | | | | |
Federal | $ | 24 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | (5) | |
State | — | | | 30 | | | 13 | |
Foreign | 4 | | | 2 | | | 2 | |
Total current | 28 | | | 61 | | | 10 | |
Deferred: | | | | | |
Federal | (78) | | | 70 | | | (66) | |
State | (18) | | | 2 | | | (48) | |
Foreign | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total deferred | (96) | | | 72 | | | (114) | |
Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (68) | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | (104) | |
A reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% to the actual expense was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Federal statutory rate | 21 | % | | 21 | % | | 21 | % |
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits | 3 | | | 6 | | | 3 | |
Discontinued operations—establishment/reversal of deferred tax liability (a) | — | | | — | | | 10 | |
Non-deductible equity compensation | — | | | 1 | | | (2) | |
Non-deductible executive compensation | (1) | | | 1 | | | (1) | |
Goodwill impairment | (8) | | | — | | | (7) | |
| | | | | |
Uncertain tax positions | (1) | | | — | | | — | |
Tax credits (b) | 7 | | | — | | | — | |
Net change in valuation allowance | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
Other permanent differences | (2) | | | (1) | | | — | |
Effective tax rate | 19 | % | | 28 | % | | 23 | % |
_______________
(a)This item reflects the tax impact from the 2019 recognition of gain on the pending sale of Cartus (previously recorded in discontinued operations) and the 2020 de-recognition of that gain.
(b)This item includes a benefit related to the completion of a research tax credit study for tax years 2016 through 2022.
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and tax purposes. The components of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Deferred income tax assets: | | | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 39 | | | $ | 45 | |
Tax credit carryforwards | 27 | | | 27 | |
Accrued liabilities and deferred income | 86 | | | 91 | |
Interest expense limitation carryforward | 41 | | | — | |
Operating leases | 133 | | | 147 | |
Minimum pension obligations | 14 | | | 15 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | 9 | | | 9 | |
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits | 1 | | | 1 | |
Interest rate swaps | — | | | 12 | |
Other | 1 | | | 2 | |
Total deferred tax assets | 351 | | | 349 | |
Less: valuation allowance | (20) | | | (20) | |
Total deferred income tax assets after valuation allowance | 331 | | | 329 | |
Deferred income tax liabilities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 433 | | | 546 | |
Operating leases | 111 | | | 119 | |
Prepaid expenses | 9 | | | 9 | |
Basis difference in investment in joint ventures | 17 | | | 7 | |
Other | — | | | 1 | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | 570 | | | 682 | |
Net deferred income tax liabilities | $ | (239) | | | $ | (353) | |
As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s deferred tax asset for net operating loss carryforwards is primarily related to certain state net operating loss carryforwards which expire between 2025 and 2034. The Company’s deferred tax asset for tax credits carryforwards is primarily related to foreign tax credits and certain state R&D credits which expire between 2024 and 2033. The Company's interest expense limitation carryforward never expires.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the FASB guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company reflects changes in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $20 million, of which $18 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized. The Company does not expect that its unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change over the next twelve months.
The Company files U.S., state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. Tax returns for the 2006 through 2022 tax years remain subject to examination by federal and certain state tax authorities. In significant foreign jurisdictions, tax returns for the 2017 through 2022 tax years generally remain subject to examination by their respective tax authorities. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $1 million in certain taxing jurisdictions where the statute of limitations is set to expire within the next twelve months.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and operating expenses, respectively. The Company recognized an increase of interest expense of $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and no change of interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized in the table below:
| | | | | |
Unrecognized tax benefits—January 1, 2020 | $ | 20 | |
Reduction due to lapse of statute of limitations | (1) | |
Unrecognized tax benefits—December 31, 2020 | 19 | |
Settlements | (1) | |
Reduction due to lapse of statute of limitations | (1) | |
Unrecognized tax benefits—December 31, 2021 | 17 | |
Gross increases - tax positions in prior periods | 3 | |
Gross decreases - tax positions in prior periods | (1) | |
Gross increases - tax positions in current period | 1 | |
| |
| |
Unrecognized tax benefits—December 31, 2022 | $ | 20 | |
The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes and recording related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities whereby the outcome of the audits is uncertain. The Company believes there is appropriate support for positions taken on its tax returns. The liabilities that have been recorded represent the best estimates of the probable loss on certain positions and are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter. However, the outcomes of tax audits are inherently uncertain.
Tax Sharing Agreement
Under the Tax Sharing Agreement with Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport, the Company is generally responsible for 62.5% of payments made to settle claims with respect to tax periods ending on or prior to December 31, 2006 that relate to income taxes imposed on Cendant and certain of its subsidiaries, the operations (or former operations) of which were determined by Cendant not to relate specifically to the respective businesses of Anywhere, Wyndham Worldwide, Avis Budget or Travelport. With respect to any remaining residual legacy Cendant tax liabilities, the Company and its former parent believe there is appropriate support for the positions taken on Cendant’s tax returns. However, tax audits and any related litigation, including disputes or litigation on the allocation of tax liabilities between parties under the Tax Sharing Agreement, could result in outcomes for the Company that are different from those reflected in the Company’s historical financial statements.
13. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company grants stock-based compensation awards to certain senior management members, employees and directors including non-qualified stock options, restricted stock units ("RSUs") and performance share units ("PSUs").
The Company's stockholders approved the Amended and Restated 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2018 Plan") at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2021. Under the 2018 Plan, a total of 9 million shares were authorized for issuance and as of December 31, 2022, there are approximately 3.4 million shares available for future grants.
The form of equity award agreements includes a retirement provision for equity grants which provide for continued vesting of awards once an employee has attained the age of 65 years, or 55 years of age or older plus at least ten years of tenure with the Company, provided they have been employed or provided services to the Company for one year following the date of grant or start of the performance period.
Historically, equity awards granted annually generally included a mix of RSUs, PSUs and options. However in 2020, the Company shifted away from granting options, limited equity awards to a small group of executives and granted other key employees cash-based awards, including cash-based RSUs.
RSUs granted vest over three years, with 33.33% vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of RSUs is equal to the closing sale price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. During 2022, the Company granted restricted stock unit awards related to 1 million shares with a weighted average grant date fair value of $17.00 which
includes shares granted to certain executives in March 2022 and directors in May 2022. There were 1.9 million shares underlying share-settled RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2022 with a weighted average grant date fair value of $15.40.
PSUs are incentives that reward grantees based upon the Company's financial performance over a three-year performance period which begins January 1st of the grant year and ends on December 31st of the third year following the grant year. These awards are measured according to two metrics: one is based upon the total stockholder return of Anywhere's common stock relative to the total stockholder return of the S&P MidCap 400 index (the "RTSR award"), and the other is based upon the achievement of cumulative free cash flow goals. The payout under each PSU award is variable and based upon the extent to which the performance goals are achieved over the performance period (with a range of payout from 0% to 175% of target for the RTSR award and 0% to 200% of target for the achievement of cumulative free cash flow award) and will be distributed during the first quarter after the end of the performance period. The fair value of PSU awards without a market condition is equal to the closing sale price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant and the fair value of the RTSR awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo Simulation method. In March 2022, the Company granted performance stock unit awards related to 0.8 million shares with a weighted average grant date fair value of $16.51 to certain executives. There were 2 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2022 with a weighted average grant date fair value of $12.79.
Stock options have a maximum term of ten years and vest over four years, with 25% vesting on each anniversary date of the grant date. The options have an exercise price equal to the closing sale price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of the options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were 2.2 million options outstanding at December 31, 2022 with a weighted average exercise price of $25.42, including 2 million exercisable stock options, which have an intrinsic value of zero and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.8 years. The Company has not granted options since 2019 and forfeiture and exercise activity was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
As of December 31, 2022, based on current performance achievement expectations, there was $19 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to incentive equity awards under the plans which would be recorded in future periods as compensation expense over a remaining weighted average period of approximately 1.7 years. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to the incentive equity awards of $22 million, $29 million and $39 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
14. RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Restructuring charges for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $32 million, $17 million and $67 million, respectively. The components of the restructuring charges for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Personnel-related costs (1) | $ | 16 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 20 | |
Facility-related costs (2) | 16 | | | 11 | | | 47 | |
Total restructuring charges (3) | $ | 32 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 67 | |
_______________ (1)Personnel-related costs consist of severance costs provided to employees who have been terminated.
(2)Facility-related costs consist of costs associated with planned facility closures such as contract termination costs, amortization of lease assets that will continue to be incurred under the contract for its remaining term without economic benefit to the Company, accelerated depreciation on asset disposals and other facility and employee relocation related costs.
(3)Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2022 include $20 million of expense related to the Operational Efficiencies Plan and $12 million of expense related to prior restructuring plans. Restructuring charges for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 related to prior restructuring plans.
Operational Efficiencies Plan
Beginning in the third quarter of 2022, the Company commenced the implementation of a plan ("the Plan") to reduce its office footprint costs, centralize certain aspects of its operational support structure and drive changes in how it serves its affiliated independent sales agents as well as consumers from a marketing and technology perspective. Furthermore, in
January 2023, the Company executed a meaningful workforce reduction driven by worsening trends in the housing market. These actions build on the multiple other cost reduction and spending reprioritization initiatives such as simplified and more integrated and digitized offerings, systems and support. Delivering the Company’s business model more digitally is an increasing part of improving the consumer experience and the Company's ongoing cost focus. The Company expects to continue to prioritize investments in efforts to support its independent sales agents, franchisees and consumers which includes investments in technology and innovative products, lead generation and franchisee support.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserve balances related to the Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Personnel-related costs | | Facility-related costs | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Restructuring charges (1) | 14 | | | 6 | | | 20 | |
Costs paid or otherwise settled | (4) | | | (4) | | | (8) | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 10 | | | $ | 2 | | | 12 | |
_______________ (1)In addition, the Company incurred an additional $5 million of facility-related costs for lease asset impairments in connection with the Plan during the year ended December 31, 2022.
The following table shows the total costs currently expected to be incurred by type of cost related to the Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total amount expected to be incurred | | Amount incurred to date | | Total amount remaining to be incurred |
Personnel-related costs | $ | 23 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 9 | |
Facility-related costs | 12 | | | 6 | | | 6 | |
Total | $ | 35 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 15 | |
The following table shows the total costs currently expected to be incurred by reportable segment related to the Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total amount expected to be incurred | | Amount incurred to date | | Total amount remaining to be incurred |
Franchise Group | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 26 | | | 14 | | | 12 | |
Title Group | — | | | — | | | — | |
Corporate and Other | 7 | | | 4 | | | 3 | |
Total | $ | 35 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 15 | |
Prior Restructuring Plans
During 2019, the Company took various strategic initiatives to reduce costs and institute operational and facility related efficiencies to drive profitability. During 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company transitioned substantially all of its employees to a remote-work environment which allowed the Company to reevaluate its office space needs. As a result, additional facility and operational efficiencies were identified and implemented which included the transformation of its corporate headquarters in Madison, New Jersey to an open-plan innovation hub. At December 31, 2021, the remaining liability related to these initiatives was $18 million. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company incurred $12 million of costs and paid or settled $18 million of costs resulting in a remaining accrual of $12 million at December 31, 2022. The remaining accrual of $12 million and total amount remaining to be incurred of $24 million primarily relate to the transformation of the Company's corporate headquarters.
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings, alternative dispute resolution and governmental inquiries or regulatory actions related to alleged contract disputes, business practices, intellectual property and other commercial, employment, regulatory and tax matters, including the matters described below.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for legal matters as appropriate. The Company records litigation accruals for legal matters when it is both probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Where the reasonable estimate of the probable loss is a range, the Company records as an accrual in its financial statements the most likely estimate of the loss, or the low end of the range if there is no one best estimate. For other litigation for which a loss is reasonably possible, the Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses.
Litigation and other disputes are inherently unpredictable and subject to substantial uncertainties and unfavorable developments and resolutions could occur and even cases brought by us can involve counterclaims asserted against us. In addition, litigation and other legal matters, including class action lawsuits and regulatory proceedings challenging practices that have broad impact, can be costly to defend and, depending on the class size and claims, could be costly to settle. Insurance coverage may be unavailable for certain types of claims (including antitrust and Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") litigation) and even where available, insurance carriers may dispute coverage for various reasons, including the cost of defense, there is a deductible for each such case, and such insurance may not be sufficient to cover the losses the Company incurs.
From time to time, even if the Company believes it has substantial defenses, it may consider litigation settlements based on a variety of circumstances.
Due to the foregoing factors as well as the factors set forth below, the Company could incur charges or judgments or enter into settlements of claims, based upon future events or developments, with liabilities that are materially in excess of amounts accrued and these judgments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in any particular period. As such, an increase in accruals for one or more of these matters in any reporting period may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows for that period.
The below captioned matters address certain current litigation involving the Company, including antitrust litigation, litigation related to the TCPA, and worker classification litigation. The captioned matters described herein involve evolving, complex litigation and the Company assesses its accruals on an ongoing basis taking into account the procedural stage and developments in the litigation. One of the antitrust class action matters (the Burnett litigation) is scheduled to go to trial in October 2023 and the TCPA class action case is scheduled to go to trial in May 2023.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in each of these matters, believes it has substantial defenses against plaintiffs' claims and is vigorously defending these actions.
All of these matters are presented as currently captioned, but as noted elsewhere in this Annual Report, Realogy Holdings Corp. has been renamed Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
Antitrust Litigation
The cases included under this header, Antitrust Litigation, are class actions that challenge residential real estate industry rules and practices for payment of buyer broker commissions. The issues raised by these cases have not been previously adjudicated, and the cases are pending in multiple jurisdictions, are at various stages of litigation, claim to cover lengthy periods, involve different assertions with respect to liability and damages, include federal and certain state law claims, involve numerous and differing parties, and—given that antitrust laws generally provide for joint and several liability and treble damages—could result in a broad range of outcomes, making it difficult to predict possible damages or how legal, factual and damages issues will be resolved.
These factors also complicate the potential for achieving settlement in individual cases or any global multi-party settlement although the Company believes, given the industry-wide impacts of the issues being litigated, potential resolution options should be considered.
The Company believes that additional antitrust litigation may be possible depending on decisions in pending litigation or regulatory developments affecting the industry.
In each of these cases, plaintiffs claim damages for all or a meaningful portion of the buyer brokers’ commission paid in each transaction irrespective of the fact that the Company retained relatively little of those commissions (as the vast majority of the commission remained with the independent sales agent and/or franchisee, as applicable).
Burnett, Hendrickson, Breit, Trupiano, and Keel v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri). This is a now-certified class action complaint, which was filed on April 29, 2019 and amended on June 21, 2019, June 30, 2021 and May 6, 2022 (formerly captioned as Sitzer).
The plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a continuing contract, combination, or conspiracy to unreasonably restrain trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act because defendant NAR allegedly established mandatory anticompetitive policies and rules for the multiple listing services and its member brokers that require listing brokers to make an offer of buyer broker compensation when listing a property. The plaintiffs' experts argue that “but for” the challenged NAR policies and rules, these offers of buyer broker compensation would not be made and plaintiffs seek the recovery of any commissions paid to buyers’ brokers as to both brokerage and franchised operations in the relevant geographic area.
The plaintiffs further allege that commission sharing, which provides for the broker representing the seller sharing or paying a portion of its commission to the broker representing the buyer, is anticompetitive and violates the Sherman Act, and that the brokerage/franchisor defendants conspired with NAR by requiring their respective brokerages/franchisees to comply with NAR’s policies, rules, and Code of Ethics, and engaged in other allegedly anticompetitive conduct including, but not limited to, steering and agent education that allegedly promotes the practice of paying buyer broker compensation and discourages commission negotiation. Plaintiffs’ experts dispute defendants’ contention that the practice of offering and paying buyer broker compensation is based on natural and legitimate economic incentives and benefits that exist irrespective of the challenged NAR policies and rules and also contend that international practices are comparable benchmarks.
The antitrust claims in the Burnett litigation are limited both in allegations and relief sought to home sellers who from April 29, 2015, to the present used a listing broker affiliated with one of the brokerage/franchisor defendants in four MLSs that primarily serve the State of Missouri, purportedly in violation of federal and Missouri antitrust laws. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from requiring home sellers to pay buyer broker commissions or from otherwise restricting competition among brokers, an award of damages and/or restitution for the class period, attorneys' fees and costs of suit. Plaintiffs allege joint and several liability and seek treble damages.
In addition, the plaintiffs include a cause of action for alleged violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, or MMPA, on behalf of Missouri residents only, with a class period that commences April 29, 2014. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from engaging in conduct in violation of the MMPA, an award of damages and/or restitution for the class period, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, and costs of suit.
On August 22, 2019, the Court denied defendants’ motions to transfer the litigation to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and on October 16, 2019, the Court denied the motions to dismiss this litigation filed respectively by NAR and the Company (together with the other named brokerage/franchisor defendants). In September 2019, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a statement of interest and appearances for this matter and, in July 2020 and July 2021, requested the Company provide it with all materials produced in this matter.
The Court granted class certification on April 22, 2022. The Company's petition for an interlocutory appeal of the class certification decision was denied by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on June 2, 2022. The class the Court has certified includes, according to plaintiffs, over 310,000 transactions for which the plaintiffs are seeking a full refund of the buyer brokers’ commissions. On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a decision denying the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this matter. The Court’s summary-judgment decision holds that plaintiffs have adduced evidence to support their contention that the challenged rules constitute per se violations of the Sherman Act. Because other courts considering similar antitrust challenges to MLS rules have held that such rules cannot be treated as per se violations, the defendants filed a motion asking the Court to certify the issue for a discretionary interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, but the motion was denied by the Court on January 27, 2023.
On December 29, 2022 the court also entered an order directing the parties to conduct a mediation no later than March 15, 2023. On February 6, the court was advised that the parties had participated in the court-ordered mediation. This case had been scheduled to go to trial in February 2023. The court has now continued the trial until October 2023.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to both plaintiffs’ claims and damage assertions, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Moehrl, Cole, Darnell, Ramey, Umpa and Ruh v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, The Long & Foster Companies, Inc., RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). The Moehrl complaint contains substantially similar allegations, and seeks the same relief under the Sherman Act, as the Burnett litigation. The Moehrl complaint, however, is brought on behalf of home sellers in 20 MLSs in various parts of the country that do not overlap with the Burnett MLSs and purports to cover transactions beginning from March 6, 2015 through December 31, 2020.
In contrast to the Burnett plaintiffs, the Moehrl plaintiffs acknowledge that there are economic reasons why a seller would offer buyer compensation (and accordingly, do not seek recovery of all commissions paid to buyers’ brokers), although plaintiffs allege that buyer brokers are overpaid due to the mandatory nature of the applicable NAR policies and rules.
In October 2019, the DOJ filed a statement of interest for this matter. A motion to appoint lead counsel in the case was granted on an interim basis by the Court in May 2020. In October 2020, the Court denied the separate motions to dismiss filed in August 2019 by each of NAR and the Company (together with the other defendants named in the amended Moehrl complaint). Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on February 23, 2022. The Company’s opposition to the plaintiffs' class certification motion was filed on May 31, 2022 (together with the other defendants named in the complaint) and plaintiffs’ reply in further support of their motion was filed on August 22, 2022; plaintiffs’ motion for class certification remains pending. Discovery in the case is ongoing.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to both plaintiffs’ claims and damage assertions, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Batton, Bolton, Brace, Kim, James, Mullis, Bisbicos and Parsons v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, The Long & Foster Companies, Inc., RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division). In this putative nationwide class action filed on January 25, 2021 (formerly captioned as Leeder), the plaintiffs take issue with certain NAR policies, including those related to buyer broker compensation at issue in the Moehrl and Burnett matters, as well as those at issue in the 2020 settlement between the DOJ and NAR, but claim the alleged conspiracy has harmed buyers (instead of sellers). The plaintiffs allege that the defendants made agreements and engaged in a conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act and were unjustly enriched, and seek a permanent injunction enjoining NAR from establishing in the future the same or similar rules, policies, or practices as those challenged in the action as well as an award of damages and/or restitution, interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
On May 2, 2022, the Court granted the motion to dismiss filed by the Company (together with the other companies named in the complaint) without prejudice. On July 6, 2022, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint substituting in eight new named plaintiffs and no longer naming Leeder as named plaintiff, that may consequently be referred to as Batton v. The National Association of Realtors, et al. The amended complaint is substantially similar to the original complaint but, in addition to the federal Sherman Act and unjust enrichment claims, plaintiffs have added two claims based on certain state antitrust statutes and consumer protection statutes. The Company (together with the other companies named in the complaint) filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on September 7, 2022. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion was filed October 21, 2022, and defendants’ reply was filed on November 22, 2022; that fully briefed motion to dismiss remains pending. Discovery has not commenced.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to plaintiffs’ claims, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Nosalek, Hirschorn and Hirschorn v. MLS Property Information Network, Inc., Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts). This is a putative class action filed on December 17, 2020 (formerly captioned as Bauman), wherein the plaintiffs take issue with policies and rules similar to those at issue in the Moehrl and Burnett matters, but rather than objecting to the national policies and rules published by NAR, this lawsuit specifically objects to the alleged
policies and rules of a multiple listing service (MLS Property Information Network, Inc.) that is owned by realtors, including in part by one of the Company's company-owned brokerages. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants made agreements and engaged in a conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act and seek a permanent injunction, enjoining the defendants from continuing conduct determined to be unlawful, as well as an award of damages and/or restitution, interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses. On December 10, 2021, the Court denied the motion to dismiss filed in March 2021 by the Company (together with the other defendants named in the complaint). On March 1, 2022, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint substituting in two new named plaintiffs and no longer naming the Baumans as named plaintiffs, that may consequently be referred to as Nosalek v. MLS Property Information Network, Inc. On January 9, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint which, among other things, added certain entities as defendants, including certain Anywhere wholly-owned franchisor subsidiaries, removed the Count II state law claims that the plaintiffs had previously voluntarily dismissed, and redefined the covered area as limited to home sales in Massachusetts (removing New Hampshire and Rhode Island). The lawsuit seeks to represent a class of sellers who paid a broker commission in connection with the sale of a property listed in the MLS Property Information Network, Inc. On January 23, 2023, MLS Property Information Network, Inc., HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. filed their answer to the second amended complaint. The Anywhere defendants filed their answer to the second amended complaint on February 21, 2023. Discovery in the case has commenced.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to plaintiffs’ claims, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
Bumpus, et al. v. Realogy Holdings Corp., et al. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division). In this class action filed on June 11, 2019, against Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (f/k/a Realogy Holdings Corp.), Anywhere Intermediate Holdings LLC (f/k/a Realogy Intermediate Holdings LLC), Anywhere Real Estate Group LLC (f/k/a Realogy Group LLC ), Anywhere Real Estate Services Group LLC (f/k/a Realogy Services Group LLC), and Anywhere Advisors LLC (f/k/a Realogy Brokerage Group LLC and NRT LLC), and Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC, plaintiffs allege that independent sales agents affiliated with Anywhere Advisors LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) using dialers provided by Mojo and others. Plaintiffs seek relief on behalf of a National Do Not Call Registry class, an Internal Do Not Call class, and an Artificial or Prerecorded Message class.
In March 2022, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification for the foregoing classes as to the Anywhere defendants but not as to co-defendant Mojo and dismissed Mojo from the case. Plaintiffs and the Anywhere defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment were denied without prejudice on May 11, 2022. The Company's petition for permission to appeal the class certification filed with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was denied and the plaintiffs’ class notice plan was approved on May 26, 2022.
On January 18, 2023, the Court set a trial date of May 15, 2023. A mediation between the parties in August 2022 did not result in resolution of this matter. While the Company may pursue further attempts at mediation, it can provide no assurance as to whether any such mediation would be successful.
Plaintiffs claim that there were over 1.2 million calls that qualify for inclusion in the classes. The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to both plaintiffs’ liability claims and damage assertions, and is vigorously defending this action.
Worker Classification Litigation
Whitlach v. Premier Valley, Inc. d/b/a Century 21 M&M and Century 21 Real Estate LLC (Superior Court of California, Stanislaus County). This was filed as a putative class action complaint on December 20, 2018 by plaintiff James Whitlach against Premier Valley Inc., a Century 21 Real Estate independently-owned franchisee doing business as Century 21 M&M (“Century 21 M&M”). The complaint also names Century 21 Real Estate LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the franchisor of Century 21 Real Estate (“Century 21”), as an alleged joint employer of the franchisee’s independent sales agents and seeks to certify a class that could potentially include all agents of both Century 21 M&M and Century 21 in California. In February 2019, the plaintiff amended his complaint to assert claims pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Following the Court's dismissal of the plaintiff's non-PAGA claims without prejudice in June 2019, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint asserting one cause of action for alleged civil penalties under PAGA in June 2020 and continued to pursue his PAGA claims as a representative of purported "aggrieved employees" as defined by PAGA. As such representative, the plaintiff seeks all non-individualized relief available to the purported aggrieved employees under PAGA, as well as attorneys’ fees. Under California law, PAGA claims are generally not subject to arbitration and may result in exposure in the form of additional penalties.
In the second amended complaint, the plaintiff continues to allege that Century 21 M&M misclassified all of its independent real estate agents, salespeople, sales professionals, broker associates and other similar positions as independent contractors, failed to pay minimum wages, failed to provide meal and rest breaks, failed to pay timely wages, failed to keep proper records, failed to provide appropriate wage statements, made unlawful deductions from wages, and failed to reimburse plaintiff and the putative class for business related expenses, resulting in violations of the California Labor Code. The demurrer filed by Century 21 M&M (and joined by Century 21) on August 3, 2020 to the plaintiff's amended complaint, was granted by the Court on November 10, 2020, dismissing the case without leave to replead. In January 2021, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s order granting the demurrer and filed its brief in support of the appeal in June 2021. In October 2021, Century 21 and Century 21 M&M filed their appellate brief in opposition to plaintiff’s appeal and in January 2022, plaintiff filed its reply brief in support of the appeal. In September 2022, Century 21 and Century 21 M&M filed a motion with the Appellate Court to dismiss the appeal in favor of arbitration in response to a recent change in the law, which the plaintiff opposed. On November 18, 2022, the Appellate Court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s grant of the demurrer to Century 21 M&M and Century 21 (and, therefore, found the motion requesting arbitration to be moot). Plaintiff's petition for rehearing filed with the Appellate Court was denied on December 5, 2022 and, on January 26, 2023, plaintiff filed a petition for review of the Appellate Court’s ruling with the Supreme Court of the State of California. This case raises various previously unlitigated claims and the PAGA claim adds additional litigation, financial and operating uncertainties.
Other
Examples of other legal matters involving the Company may include, but are not limited to:
•antitrust and anti-competition claims;
•TCPA claims;
•claims alleging violations of RESPA, state consumer fraud statutes, federal consumer protection statutes or other state real estate law violations;
•employment law claims, including claims that independent residential real estate sales agents engaged by our company owned brokerages or by affiliated franchisees—under certain state or federal laws—are potentially employees instead of independent contractors, and they or regulators therefore may bring claims against our Owned Brokerage Group for breach of contract, wage and hour classification claims, wrongful discharge, unemployment and workers' compensation and could seek benefits, back wages, overtime, indemnification, penalties related to classification practices and expense reimbursement available to employees or make similar claims against Franchise Group as an alleged joint employer of an affiliated franchisee’s independent sales agents;
•other employment law matters, including other types of worker classification claims as well as wage and hour claims and retaliation claims;
•information security claims, including claims under new and emerging data privacy laws related to the protection of customer, employee or third-party information;
•cyber-crime claims, including claims related to the diversion of homesale transaction closing funds;
•vicarious or joint liability claims based upon the conduct of individuals or entities traditionally outside of our control, including franchisees and independent sales agents, under joint employer claims or other theories of actual or apparent agency;
•claims by current or former franchisees that franchise agreements were breached, including improper terminations;
•claims generally against the company owned brokerage operations for negligence, misrepresentation or breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the performance of real estate brokerage or other professional services as well as other brokerage claims associated with listing information and property history;
•claims related to intellectual property or copyright law, including infringement actions alleging improper use of copyrighted photographs on websites or in marketing materials without consent of the copyright holder or claims challenging our trademarks;
•claims concerning breach of obligations to make websites and other services accessible for consumers with disabilities;
•claims against the title agent contending that the agent knew or should have known that a transaction was fraudulent or that the agent was negligent in addressing title defects or conducting the settlement;
•claims related to disclosure or securities law violations as well as derivative suits; and
•fraud, defalcation or misconduct claims.
Other ordinary course legal proceedings that may arise from time to time include those related to commercial arrangements, indemnification (under contract or common law), franchising arrangements, the fiduciary duties of brokers, standard brokerage disputes like the failure to disclose accurate square footage or hidden defects in the property such as mold, claims under the False Claims Act (or similar state laws), consumer lending and debt collection law claims, state auction law, and violations of similar laws in countries where we operate around the world with respect to any of the foregoing. In addition, with the increasing requirements resulting from government laws and regulations concerning data breach notifications and data privacy and protection obligations, claims associated with these laws may become more common. While most litigation involves claims against the Company, from time to time the Company commences litigation, including litigation against former employees, franchisees and competitors when it alleges that such persons or entities have breached agreements or engaged in other wrongful conduct.
* * *
Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Guarantees to Cendant and Affiliates
Anywhere Group (then Realogy Corporation) separated from Cendant on July 31, 2006 (the "Separation"), pursuant to a plan by Cendant (now known as Avis Budget Group, Inc.) to separate into four independent companies—one for each of Cendant's business units—real estate services (Anywhere Group, formerly referred to as Realogy Group), travel distribution services ("Travelport"), hospitality services, including timeshare resorts ("Wyndham Worldwide"), and vehicle rental ("Avis Budget Group"). Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of July 27, 2006 among Cendant, Anywhere Group, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport (the "Separation and Distribution Agreement"), each of Anywhere Group, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport have assumed certain contingent and other corporate liabilities (and related costs and expenses), which are primarily related to each of their respective businesses. In addition, Anywhere Group has assumed 62.5% and Wyndham Worldwide has assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities (and related costs and expenses) of Cendant.
The due to former parent balance was $20 million and $19 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The due to former parent balance was comprised of the Company’s portion of the following: (i) Cendant’s remaining contingent tax liabilities, (ii) potential liabilities related to Cendant’s terminated or divested businesses, and (iii) potential liabilities related to the residual portion of accruals for Cendant operations.
Tax Matters
The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes and recording related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities whereby the outcome of the audits is uncertain. The Company believes there is appropriate support for positions taken on its tax returns. The liabilities that have been recorded represent the best estimates of the probable loss on certain positions and are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter. However, the outcomes of tax audits are inherently uncertain.
Escrow and Trust Deposits
As a service to its customers, the Company administers escrow and trust deposits which represent undisbursed amounts received for the settlement of real estate transactions. Deposits at FDIC-insured institutions are insured up to $250 thousand. These escrow and trust deposits totaled approximately $794 million at December 31, 2022. While these deposits are not assets of the Company (and, therefore, are excluded from the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets), the Company remains contingently liable for the disposition of these deposits.
Purchase Commitments and Minimum Licensing Fees
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various commitments to purchase goods or services from specific suppliers, including those related to capital expenditures. The purchase commitments made by the Company as of December 31, 2022 are approximately $116 million.
The Company is required to pay a minimum licensing fee to Sotheby’s which began in 2009 and continues through 2054. The annual minimum licensing fee is approximately $2 million per year. The Company is also required to pay a minimum licensing fee to Meredith Operations Corporation from 2009 through 2058 for the licensing of the Better Homes
and Gardens® Real Estate brand. The annual minimum fee was approximately $4 million in 2022 and will generally remain the same thereafter.
Future minimum payments for these purchase commitments and minimum licensing fees as of December 31, 2022 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Year | | Amount |
2023 | | $ | 63 | |
2024 | | 39 | |
2025 | | 24 | |
2026 | | 10 | |
2027 | | 9 | |
Thereafter | | 192 | |
Total | | $ | 337 | |
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into numerous agreements that contain standard guarantees and indemnities whereby the Company indemnifies another party for breaches of representations and warranties. In addition, many of these parties are also indemnified against any third-party claim resulting from the transaction that is contemplated in the underlying agreement. Such guarantees or indemnifications are granted under various agreements, including those governing: (i) purchases, sales or outsourcing of assets or businesses, (ii) leases and sales of real estate, (iii) licensing of trademarks, (iv) use of derivatives, and (v) issuances of debt securities. The guarantees or indemnifications issued are for the benefit of the: (i) buyers in sale agreements and sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords in lease contracts, (iii) franchisees in licensing agreements, (iv) financial institutions in derivative contracts, and (v) underwriters in issuances of securities. While some of these guarantees extend only for the duration of the underlying agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under these guarantees, nor is the Company able to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees as the triggering events are not subject to predictability. With respect to certain of the aforementioned guarantees, such as indemnifications of landlords against third-party claims for the use of real estate property leased by the Company, the Company maintains insurance coverage that mitigates any potential payments to be made.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Company coordinates numerous events for its franchisees and thus reserves a number of venues with certain minimum guarantees, such as room rentals at hotels local to the conference center. However, such room rentals are paid by each individual franchisee. If the franchisees do not meet the minimum guarantees, the Company is obligated to fulfill the minimum guaranteed fees. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company would be required to make under such guarantees is approximately $10 million. The Company would only be required to pay this maximum amount if none of the franchisees attended the planned events at the reserved venues. Historically, the Company has not been required to make material payments under these guarantees.
Insurance and Self-Insurance
The Consolidated Balance Sheets include liabilities relating to: (i) self-insured risks for errors and omissions and other legal matters incurred in the ordinary course of business within Owned Brokerage Group and (ii) premium and claim reserves for the Company’s title underwriting business. The Company may also be subject to legal claims arising from the handling of escrow transactions and closings. Owned Brokerage Group carries errors and omissions insurance for errors made during the real estate settlement process of $15 million in the aggregate, subject to a deductible of $1.5 million per occurrence. In addition, the Company carries an additional errors and omissions insurance policy for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. and its subsidiaries for errors made for real estate related services up to $45 million in the aggregate, subject to a deductible of $2.5 million per occurrence. This policy also provides excess coverage to Owned Brokerage Group creating an aggregate limit of $60 million, subject to Owned Brokerage Group's deductible of $1.5 million per occurrence.
The Company, through its appropriately licensed subsidiaries within Title Group, acts as a title agent in real estate transactions and helps to provide coverage for real property to mortgage lenders and buyers of real property. When a
subsidiary within Title Group is acting as a title agent issuing a policy on behalf of an underwriter, assuming no negligence on the part of the title agent, such subsidiary is not liable for losses under those policies but rather the title insurer is typically liable for such losses.
Fraud, defalcation and misconduct by employees are also risks inherent in the business. The Company is the custodian of cash deposited by customers with specific instructions as to its disbursement from escrow, trust and account servicing files. The Company maintains fidelity insurance covering the loss or theft of funds of up to $30 million per occurrence, subject to a deductible of $1 million per occurrence.
The Company also maintains self-insurance arrangements relating to health and welfare, workers’ compensation, auto and general liability in addition to other benefits provided to the Company’s employees. The accruals for these self-insurance arrangements totaled approximately $13 million for both December 31, 2022 and 2021.
16. EQUITY
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive losses are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Currency Translation Adjustments (1) | | Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (2) |
Balance at January 1, 2020 | $ | (8) | | | $ | (48) | | | $ | (56) | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | — | | | (6) | | | (6) | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | | | 2 | | (3) | 2 | |
Income tax benefit | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Current period change | — | | | (3) | | | (3) | |
Balance at December 31, 2020 | (8) | | | (51) | | | (59) | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications | (1) | | | 10 | | | 9 | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | | | 3 | | (3) | 3 | |
Income tax expense | — | | | (3) | | | (3) | |
Current period change | (1) | | | 10 | | | 9 | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | (9) | | | (41) | | | (50) | |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | | | 2 | | (3) | 2 | |
Income tax expense | — | | | (1) | | | (1) | |
Current period change | — | | | 2 | | | 2 | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | (9) | | | $ | (39) | | | $ | (48) | |
_______________
(1)Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having non-U.S. dollar functional currencies are translated at exchange rates at the balance sheet dates and equity accounts are translated at historical spot rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the periods presented. The gains or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2)As of December 31, 2022, the Company does not have any after-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.
(3)These amounts represent the amortization of actuarial gain (loss) to periodic pension cost and were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to the general and administrative expenses line on the statement of operations.
Anywhere Group Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Total equity for Anywhere Group equals that of Anywhere, but the components, common stock and additional paid-in capital are different. The table below presents information regarding the balances and changes in common stock and additional paid-in capital of Anywhere Group for each of the three years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Anywhere Group Stockholder’s Equity | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Non- controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
| Shares | | Amount | |
Balance at January 1, 2020 | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,843 | | | $ | (2,695) | | | $ | (56) | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 2,096 | |
Net (loss) income | — | | | — | | | — | | | (360) | | | — | | | 4 | | | (356) | |
Other comprehensive loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3) | | | — | | | (3) | |
Stock-based compensation | — | | | — | | | 34 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 34 | |
Dividends | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4) | | | (4) | |
Balance at December 31, 2020 | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,877 | | | $ | (3,055) | | | $ | (59) | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 1,767 | |
Net income | — | | | — | | | — | | | 343 | | | — | | | 7 | | | 350 | |
Other comprehensive income | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | — | | | 9 | |
Contributions from Anywhere | — | | | — | | | 51 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 51 | |
Stock-based compensation | — | | | — | | | 20 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 20 | |
Dividends | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5) | | | (5) | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,948 | | | $ | (2,712) | | | $ | (50) | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 2,192 | |
Cumulative effect adjustment due to the adoption of ASU 2020-06 | — | | | — | | | (53) | | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | (48) | |
Net loss (income) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (287) | | | — | | | 4 | | | (283) | |
Other comprehensive income | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | | | — | | | 2 | |
Repurchase of common stock | — | | | — | | | (97) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (97) | |
Contributions from Anywhere | — | | | — | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | |
Stock-based compensation | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6 | |
Dividends | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | (8) | |
Contributions from non-controlling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,806 | | | $ | (2,994) | | | $ | (48) | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 1,767 | |
17. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Anywhere
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed based on net income (loss) attributable to Anywhere stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed consistently with the basic computation plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares include shares that the Company could be obligated to issue from its Exchangeable Senior Notes and warrants if dilutive (see Note 9, "Short and Long-Term Debt", for further discussion) and outstanding stock-based compensation awards (see Note 13, "Stock-Based Compensation", for further discussion). For purposes of computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share, weighted average common shares do not include potentially dilutive common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As such, the shares that the Company could be obligated to issue from its stock options, warrants and Exchangeable Senior Notes are excluded from the earnings (loss) per share calculation if the exercise or exchangeable price exceeds the average market price of common shares.
The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate the dilutive effect of outstanding stock-based compensation. If dilutive, the Company uses the if converted method to calculate the dilutive effect of its Exchangeable Senior Notes. These notes will have a dilutive impact when the average market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the initial
exchange price of $24.49 per share. The Exchangeable Senior Notes were not dilutive as of December 31, 2022 as the closing price of the Company's common stock as of December 31, 2022 was less than the initial exchange price.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(in millions, except per share data) | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Numerator: | | | | | |
Net (loss) income attributable to Anywhere shareholders | $ | (287) | | | $ | 343 | | | $ | (360) | |
Denominator: | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (denominator for basic (loss) earnings per share calculation) | 113.8 | | | 116.4 | | | 115.2 | |
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards (a) | — | | | 3.8 | | | — | |
Dilutive effect of Exchangeable Senior Notes and warrants (b) | — | | | — | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per share calculation) | 113.8 | | | 120.2 | | | 115.2 | |
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to Anywhere shareholders: | | | | | |
Basic (loss) earnings per share | $ | (2.52) | | | $ | 2.95 | | | $ | (3.13) | |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share | $ | (2.52) | | | $ | 2.85 | | | $ | (3.13) | |
_______________
(a)The Company was in a net loss position for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2020, and therefore the impact of incentive equity awards were excluded from the computation of dilutive loss per share as the inclusion of such amounts would be anti-dilutive. The year ended December 31, 2021 excludes 3.7 million shares of common stock issuable for incentive equity awards which includes performance share units based on the achievement of target amounts, that are anti-dilutive to the diluted earnings per share computation.
(b)Shares to be provided to the Company from the exchangeable note hedge transactions purchased concurrently with its issuance of Exchangeable Senior Notes in June 2021 are anti-dilutive and therefore they are not treated as a reduction to its diluted shares.
The Company may repurchase shares of its common stock under authorizations from its Board of Directors. Shares repurchased are retired and not displayed separately as treasury stock on the consolidated financial statements. The par value of the shares repurchased and retired is deducted from common stock and the excess of the purchase price over par value is first charged against any available additional paid-in capital with the balance charged to retained earnings. Direct costs incurred to repurchase the shares are included in the total cost of the shares.
The Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $300 million of the Company's common stock in February 2022. From the date of authorization through December 31, 2022, the Company repurchased and retired 8.8 million shares of common stock for $97 million. As of December 31, 2022, $203 million remained available for repurchase under the share repurchase program. The purchase of shares under this plan reduces the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in the basic earnings per share calculation.
18. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
RISK MANAGEMENT
The following is a description of the Company’s risk management policies.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates primarily through senior secured debt. At December 31, 2022, the Company's primary interest rate exposure was to interest rate fluctuations, specifically LIBOR, due to its impact on variable rate borrowings under the Term Loan A Facility, and SOFR, due to its impact on our borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. In connection with the July 2022 Amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, LIBOR was replaced with a SOFR-based rate plus a 10 basis point SOFR credit spread adjustment as the applicable benchmark for the Revolving Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had variable interest rate long-term debt from outstanding amounts under the Term Loan A Facility of $222 million, which was based on LIBOR, and outstanding amounts under our Revolving Credit Facility of $350 million, which was based on term SOFR, excluding $163 million of securitization obligations.
The Company historically used interest rate swaps to manage a portion of the Company's exposure to changes in interest rate associated with variable rate borrowings. During September 2022, the Company terminated $550 million of its interest rate swaps which had expiration dates of August 2025 and November 2027 and the Company's remaining interest rate swaps, which had a value of $450 million, expired in November 2022.
Credit Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts, periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2022, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty or a group of counterparties. The Company actively monitors the credit risk associated with the Company’s receivables.
Market Risk Exposure
Owned Brokerage Group operates real estate brokerage offices located in and around large metropolitan areas in the U.S. Owned Brokerage Group has more offices and realizes more of its revenues in California, Florida and the New York metropolitan area than any other regions of the country. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Owned Brokerage Group generated approximately 23% of its revenues from California, 21% from the New York metropolitan area and 13% from Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Owned Brokerage Group generated approximately 25% of its revenues from California, 21% from the New York metropolitan area and 13% from Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Owned Brokerage Group generated approximately 24% of its revenues from California, 20% from the New York metropolitan area and 11% from Florida.
Derivative Instruments
The Company records derivatives and hedging activities on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. During September 2022, the Company terminated $550 million of its interest rate swaps which had expiration dates of August 2025 and November 2027 and the Company's remaining interest rate swaps, which had a value of $450 million, expired in November 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had no interest rate swaps.
The swaps helped to protect the Company's outstanding variable rate borrowings from future interest rate volatility. The Company had not elected to utilize hedge accounting for these interest rate swaps; therefore, any change in fair value was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The fair value of derivative instruments was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Balance Sheet Location | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
Interest rate swap contracts | | Other current and non-current liabilities | | — | | | 46 | |
The effect of derivative instruments on earnings was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Location of (Gain) or Loss Recognized for Derivative Instruments | | (Gain) or Loss Recognized on Derivatives |
Year Ended December 31, |
2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Interest rate swap contracts | | Interest expense | | $ | (40) | | | $ | (14) | | | $ | 51 | |
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value.
| | | | | | | | |
Level Input: | | Input Definitions: |
Level I | | Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. |
| |
Level II | | Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date. |
| |
Level III | | Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. |
The availability of observable inputs can vary from asset to asset and is affected by a wide variety of factors including, for example, the type of asset, whether the asset is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level III. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined by reference to quoted market values. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques, as appropriate. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined based upon a discounted cash flow approach.
The Company measures financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis and recognizes transfers within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred.
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2022 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level I | | Level II | | Level III | | Total |
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other non-current assets) | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Contingent consideration for acquisitions (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities) | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | 12 | |
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2021 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level I | | Level II | | Level III | | Total |
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other non-current assets) | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Interest rate swaps (included in other current and non-current liabilities) | — | | | 46 | | | — | | | 46 | |
Contingent consideration for acquisitions (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities) | — | | | — | | | 9 | | | 9 | |
The fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration for acquisitions is measured using a probability weighted-average discount rate to estimate future cash flows based upon the likelihood of achieving future operating results for individual acquisitions. These assumptions are deemed to be unobservable inputs and as such the Company’s contingent consideration is classified within Level III of the valuation hierarchy. The Company reassesses the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities on a quarterly basis.
The following table presents changes in Level III financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Level III |
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2021 | | $ | 9 | |
Additions: contingent consideration related to acquisitions completed during the period | | 13 | |
Reductions: payments of contingent consideration | | (4) | |
Changes in fair value (reflected in general and administrative expenses) | | (6) | |
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2022 | | $ | 12 | |
The following table summarizes the principal amount of the Company’s indebtedness compared to the estimated fair value, primarily determined by quoted market values, at:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
Debt | Principal Amount | | Estimated Fair Value (a) | | Principal Amount | | Estimated Fair Value (a) |
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 350 | | | $ | 350 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Extended Term Loan A | 222 | | | 216 | | | 232 | | | 231 | |
7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes | — | | | — | | | 550 | | | 583 | |
4.875% Senior Notes | — | | | — | | | 407 | | | 418 | |
9.375% Senior Notes | — | | | — | | | 550 | | | 596 | |
5.75% Senior Notes | 900 | | | 680 | | | 900 | | | 923 | |
5.25% Senior Notes | 1,000 | | | 729 | | | — | | | — | |
0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes | 403 | | | 280 | | | 403 | | | 399 | |
_______________
(a)The fair value of the Company's indebtedness is categorized as Level II.
19. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The reportable segments presented below represent the Company’s segments for which separate financial information is available and which is utilized on a regular basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of services provided by its segments.
Management evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable segments based upon revenue and Operating EBITDA. Operating EBITDA is defined by us as net income (loss) before depreciation and amortization, interest expense, net (other than relocation services interest for securitization assets and securitization obligations), income taxes, and other items that are not core to the operating activities of the Company such as restructuring charges, former parent legacy items, gains or losses on the early extinguishment of debt, impairments, gains or losses on discontinued operations and gains or losses on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets. The Company’s presentation of Operating EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.
In October 2022, the Company initiated a plan to integrate Owned Brokerage Group and Title Group. However, based upon industry and business developments during the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company has determined that its reportable segments will remain consistent at December 31, 2022 with prior periods.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues (a) |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchise Group | $ | 1,145 | | | $ | 1,249 | | | $ | 1,059 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 5,606 | | | 6,189 | | | 4,742 | |
Title Group | 530 | | | 952 | | | 736 | |
Corporate and Other (b) | (373) | | | (407) | | | (316) | |
Total Company | $ | 6,908 | | | $ | 7,983 | | | $ | 6,221 | |
_______________
(a)Transactions between segments are eliminated in consolidation. Revenues for Franchise Group include intercompany royalties and marketing fees paid by Owned Brokerage Group of $373 million, $407 million and $316 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Such amounts are eliminated through the Corporate and Other line.
(b)Includes the elimination of transactions between segments.
Set forth in the table below is Operating EBITDA presented by reportable segment and a reconciliation to Net (loss) income attributable to Anywhere and Anywhere Group for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating EBITDA |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchise Group | $ | 670 | | | $ | 751 | | | $ | 594 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | (86) | | | 109 | | | 48 | |
Title Group | 9 | | | 200 | | | 226 | |
Corporate and Other (a)(d) | (144) | | | (158) | | | (142) | |
Total Company | 449 | | | 902 | | | 726 | |
Less: Depreciation and amortization | 214 | | | 204 | | | 186 | |
Interest expense, net | 113 | | | 190 | | | 246 | |
Income tax (benefit) expense | (68) | | | 133 | | | (104) | |
Restructuring costs, net (b) | 32 | | | 17 | | | 67 | |
Impairments (c) | 483 | | | 4 | | | 682 | |
Former parent legacy cost, net (d) | 1 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
Loss on the early extinguishment of debt (d) | 96 | | | 21 | | | 8 | |
Gain on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets, net (e) | (135) | | | (11) | | | — | |
Net (loss) income attributable to Anywhere and Anywhere Group | $ | (287) | | | $ | 343 | | | $ | (360) | |
______________
(a)Includes the elimination of transactions between segments.
(b)The year ended December 31, 2022 includes restructuring charges of $1 million at Franchise Group, $19 million at Owned Brokerage Group and $12 million at Corporate and Other.
The year ended December 31, 2021 includes restructuring charges of $5 million at Franchise Group, $7 million at Owned Brokerage Group and $5 million at Corporate and Other.
The year ended December 31, 2020 includes restructuring charges of $15 million at Franchise Group, $37 million at Owned Brokerage Group, $4 million at Title Group and $11 million at Corporate and Other.
(c)Non-cash impairments for the year ended December 31, 2022 include an impairment of goodwill at the Owned Brokerage Group reporting unit of $280 million, an impairment of goodwill at the Franchise Group segment of $114 million related to the Cartus/Leads Group reporting unit, an impairment of franchise trademarks of $76 million and $13 million of other impairment charges related to lease asset, investment and software impairments.
Non-cash impairments for the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily relate to software and lease asset impairments.
Non-cash impairments for the year ended December 31, 2020 include:
•a goodwill impairment charge of $413 million related to Owned Brokerage Group;
•an impairment charge of $30 million related to Franchise Group's trademarks;
•$133 million of impairment charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 (while Cartus was held for sale) to reduce the net assets to the estimated proceeds;
•a goodwill impairment charge of $22 million related to Cartus;
•an impairment charge of $34 million related to Cartus' trademarks; and
•other asset impairments of $50 million primarily related to lease asset impairments.
(d)Former parent legacy items and Loss on the early extinguishment of debt are recorded in Corporate and Other.
(e)Gain on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets, net for the year ended December 31, 2022 is recorded in Title Group and related to the sale of the Title Underwriter during the first quarter of 2022 and the sale of a portion of the Company's ownership in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture during the second quarter of 2022. Gain on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets, net for the year ended December 31, 2021 is primarily recorded in Owned Brokerage Group.
Depreciation and Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchise Group | $ | 119 | | | $ | 112 | | | $ | 87 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 63 | | | 56 | | | 59 | |
Title Group | 11 | | | 11 | | | 11 | |
Corporate and Other | 21 | | | 25 | | | 29 | |
Total Company | $ | 214 | | | $ | 204 | | | $ | 186 | |
Segment Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Franchise Group | $ | 4,730 | | | $ | 4,821 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 741 | | | 1,021 | |
Title Group | 562 | | | 724 | |
Corporate and Other | 350 | | | 644 | |
Total Company | $ | 6,383 | | | $ | 7,210 | |
Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Franchise Group | $ | 42 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 27 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 40 | | | 43 | | | 39 | |
Title Group | 11 | | | 13 | | | 9 | |
Corporate and Other | 16 | | | 16 | | | 20 | |
Total Company | $ | 109 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 95 | |
The geographic segment information provided below is classified based on the geographic location of the Company’s subsidiaries.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | | All Other Countries | | Total |
On or for the year ended December 31, 2022 | | | | | |
Net revenues | $ | 6,829 | | | $ | 79 | | | $ | 6,908 | |
Total assets | 6,309 | | | 74 | | | 6,383 | |
Net property and equipment | 316 | | | 1 | | | 317 | |
On or for the year ended December 31, 2021 | | | | | |
Net revenues | $ | 7,919 | | | $ | 64 | | | $ | 7,983 | |
Total assets | 7,157 | | | 53 | | | 7,210 | |
Net property and equipment | 309 | | | 1 | | | 310 | |
On or for the year ended December 31, 2020 | | | | | |
Net revenues | $ | 6,145 | | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 6,221 | |
Total assets | 6,878 | | | 56 | | | 6,934 | |
Net property and equipment | 316 | | | 1 | | | 317 | |