NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions)
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Anywhere Real Estate Inc. ("Anywhere" or the "Company") is a holding company for its consolidated subsidiaries including Anywhere Intermediate Holdings LLC ("Anywhere Intermediate") and Anywhere Real Estate Group LLC ("Anywhere Group") and its consolidated subsidiaries. Anywhere, through its subsidiaries, is a global provider of residential real estate services. Neither Anywhere, the indirect parent of Anywhere Group, nor Anywhere Intermediate, the direct parent company of Anywhere Group, conducts any operations other than with respect to its respective direct or indirect ownership of Anywhere Group. As a result, the consolidated financial positions, results of operations, comprehensive (loss) income and cash flows of Anywhere, Anywhere Intermediate and Anywhere Group are the same.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of Anywhere and Anywhere Group. Anywhere's only asset is its investment in the common stock of Anywhere Intermediate, and Anywhere Intermediate's only asset is its investment in Anywhere Group. Anywhere's only obligations are its guarantees of certain borrowings and certain franchise obligations of Anywhere Group. All expenses incurred by Anywhere and Anywhere Intermediate are for the benefit of Anywhere Group and have been reflected in Anywhere Group's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Interim results may not be indicative of full year performance because of seasonal and short-term variations. The Company has eliminated all material intercompany transactions and balances between entities consolidated in these financial statements. In presenting the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and the related disclosures. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
In management's opinion, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of Anywhere and Anywhere Group's financial position as of March 31, 2023 and the results of operations and comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2022 was derived from audited annual financial statements but does not contain all of the footnote disclosures from the annual financial statements. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The Company reports its operations in three business segments:
•Anywhere Brands ("Franchise Group")—franchises a portfolio of well-known, industry-leading franchise brokerage brands, including Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate, Century 21®, Coldwell Banker®, Coldwell Banker Commercial®, Corcoran®, ERA® and Sotheby's International Realty®. This segment also includes the Company's lead generation activities through Anywhere Leads Group ("Leads Group") and global relocation services operation through Cartus® Relocation Services ("Cartus").
•Anywhere Advisors ("Owned Brokerage Group")—operates a full-service real estate brokerage business principally under the Coldwell Banker®, Corcoran® and Sotheby’s International Realty® brand names in many of the largest metropolitan areas in the U.S. This segment also includes the Company's share of equity earnings or losses from the Company's minority-owned real estate auction joint venture.
•Anywhere Integrated Services ("Title Group")—provides full-service title, escrow and settlement services to consumers, real estate companies, corporations and financial institutions primarily in support of residential real estate transactions. This segment also includes the Company's share of equity earnings or losses from Guaranteed Rate Affinity, the Company's minority-owned mortgage origination joint venture, and from the Company's minority-owned title insurance underwriter joint venture.
Sale of the Title Insurance Underwriter
On March 29, 2022, the Company sold its title insurance underwriter, Title Resources Guaranty Company (the "Title Underwriter") (previously reported in the Title Group reportable segment), to an affiliate of Centerbridge for $210 million (prior to expenses and tax) and a 30% equity interest in the form of common units in a title insurance underwriter joint venture that owns the Title Underwriter (the "Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture"). Upon closing of the transaction, the Company received $208 million of cash and recorded a $90 million investment related to its 30% equity interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture. As a result of the transaction, the Company disposed of $166 million of net assets, including $152 million of cash held as statutory reserves by the Title Underwriter and $32 million of goodwill, and recognized a gain of $131 million, net of fees, recorded in the Other income, net line on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the second quarter of 2022, the Company sold a portion of its interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture to a third party, reducing the Company's equity interest from 30% to 26% and resulting in a gain of $4 million. During the first quarter of 2023, the Company sold an additional portion of its interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture to a third party, reducing the Company's equity interest from 26% to 25% and resulting in a gain of $1 million. Refer Note 2, "Equity Method Investments", for additional information related to the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture.
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value.
| | | | | | | | |
Level Input: | | Input Definitions: |
| | |
Level I | | Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. |
| |
Level II | | Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date. |
| |
Level III | | Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. |
The availability of observable inputs can vary from asset to asset and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of asset, whether the asset is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level III. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined by reference to quoted market values. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques, as appropriate. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined based upon a discounted cash flow approach.
The Company measures financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis and recognizes transfers within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred.
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at March 31, 2023 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level I | | Level II | | Level III | | Total |
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other non-current assets) | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Contingent consideration for acquisitions (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities) | — | | | — | | | 11 | | | 11 | |
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2022 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level I | | Level II | | Level III | | Total |
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other non-current assets) | $ | 1 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | |
Contingent consideration for acquisitions (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities) | — | | | — | | | 12 | | | 12 | |
The fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration for acquisitions is measured using a probability weighted-average discount rate to estimate future cash flows based upon the likelihood of achieving future operating results for individual acquisitions. These assumptions are deemed to be unobservable inputs and as such the Company’s contingent consideration is classified within Level III of the valuation hierarchy. The Company reassesses the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities on a quarterly basis.
The following table presents changes in Level III financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Level III |
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2022 | | $ | 12 | |
Additions: contingent consideration related to acquisitions completed during the period | | — | |
Reductions: payments of contingent consideration | | (1) | |
Changes in fair value (reflected in general and administrative expenses) | | — | |
Fair value of contingent consideration at March 31, 2023 | | $ | 11 | |
The following table summarizes the principal amount of the Company’s indebtedness compared to the estimated fair value, primarily determined by quoted market values, at:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Debt | Principal Amount | | Estimated Fair Value (a) | | Principal Amount | | Estimated Fair Value (a) |
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 380 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 350 | | | $ | 350 | |
Extended Term Loan A | 219 | | | 218 | | | 222 | | | 216 | |
5.75% Senior Notes | 900 | | | 672 | | | 900 | | | 680 | |
5.25% Senior Notes | 1,000 | | | 725 | | | 1,000 | | | 729 | |
0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes | 403 | | | 280 | | | 403 | | | 280 | |
_______________
(a)The fair value of the Company's indebtedness is categorized as Level II.
Income Taxes
The Company's provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying its estimated annual effective tax rate against the income before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items are recorded in the period in which they occur. The provision for income taxes was a benefit of $46 million and an expense of $12 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
The Company records derivatives and hedging activities on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. The Company's remaining interest rate swaps expired in November 2022 and, as of March 31, 2023, the Company had no interest rate swaps. The Company had not elected to utilize hedge accounting for these interest rate swaps; therefore, any change in fair value was recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The gain recognized for interest rate swap contracts was $26 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, which was recorded in Interest expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenue
Revenue is recognized upon the transfer of control of promised services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those services in accordance with the revenue accounting standard. The Company's revenue is disaggregated by major revenue categories on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and further disaggregated by business segment as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| Franchise Group | | Owned Brokerage Group | | Title Group | | Corporate and Other | | Total Company |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
Gross commission income (a) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 903 | | | $ | 1,247 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 903 | | | $ | 1,247 | |
Service revenue (b) | 55 | | | 55 | | | 4 | | | 6 | | | 68 | | | 185 | | | — | | | — | | | 127 | | | 246 | |
Franchise fees (c) | 129 | | | 180 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (60) | | | (81) | | | 69 | | | 99 | |
Other (d) | 23 | | | 32 | | | 8 | | | 11 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | (3) | | | (5) | | | 32 | | | 43 | |
Net revenues | $ | 207 | | | $ | 267 | | | $ | 915 | | | $ | 1,264 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 190 | | | $ | (63) | | | $ | (86) | | | $ | 1,131 | | | $ | 1,635 | |
______________
(a)Gross commission income at Owned Brokerage Group is recognized at a point in time at the closing of a homesale transaction.
(b)Service revenue primarily consists of title and escrow fees at Title Group and are recognized at a point in time at the closing of a homesale transaction. Service revenue at Franchise Group includes relocation fees, which are recognized as revenue when or as the related performance obligation is satisfied dependent on the type of service performed, and fees related to leads and related services, which are recognized at a point in time at the closing of a homesale transaction or at the completion of the related service.
(c)Franchise fees at Franchise Group primarily include domestic royalties which are recognized at a point in time when the underlying franchisee revenue is earned (upon close of the homesale transaction).
(d)Other revenue is comprised of brand marketing funds received from franchisees at Franchise Group and other miscellaneous revenues across all of the business segments.
The following table shows the change in the Company's contract liabilities (deferred revenue) related to revenue contracts by reportable segment for the period:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning Balance at January 1, 2023 | | Additions during the period | | Recognized as Revenue during the period | | Ending Balance at March 31, 2023 |
Franchise Group: | | | | | | | |
Deferred area development fees (a) | $ | 40 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 39 | |
Deferred brand marketing fund fees (b) | 26 | | | 16 | | | (17) | | | 25 | |
Deferred outsourcing management fees (c) | 4 | | | 12 | | | (10) | | | 6 | |
Other deferred income related to revenue contracts | 10 | | | 13 | | | (8) | | | 15 | |
Total Franchise Group | 80 | | | 41 | | | (36) | | | 85 | |
Owned Brokerage Group: | | | | | | | |
Advanced commissions related to development business (d) | 11 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 12 | |
Other deferred income related to revenue contracts | 3 | | | 2 | | | — | | | 5 | |
Total Owned Brokerage Group | 14 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 17 | |
Total | $ | 94 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | (36) | | | $ | 102 | |
_______________
(a)The Company collects initial area development fees ("ADF") for international territory transactions, which are recorded as deferred revenue when received and recognized into franchise revenue over the average 25 year life of the related franchise agreement as consideration for the right to access and benefit from Anywhere’s brands. In the event an ADF agreement is terminated prior to the end of its term, the unamortized deferred revenue balance will be recognized into revenue immediately upon termination.
(b)Revenues recognized include intercompany marketing fees paid by Owned Brokerage Group.
(c)The Company earns revenues from outsourcing management fees charged to clients that may cover several of the various relocation services according to the clients' specific needs. Outsourcing management fees are recorded as deferred revenue when billed (usually at the start of the relocation) and are recognized as revenue over the average time period required to complete the transferee's move, or a phase of the move that the fee covers, which is typically 3 to 6 months depending on the move type.
(d)New development closings generally have a development period of between 18 and 24 months from contracted date to closing.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company estimates the allowance necessary to provide for uncollectible accounts receivable. The estimate is based on historical experience, combined with a review of current conditions and forecasts of future losses, and includes specific accounts for which payment has become unlikely. The process by which the Company calculates the allowance is performed in the individual business units where specific problem accounts are identified and reserved primarily based upon the age profile of the receivables and specific payment issues, combined with reasonable and supportable forecasts of future losses.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Significant non-cash transactions included finance lease additions of $2 million and $3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which resulted in non-cash additions to property and equipment, net and other non-current liabilities. Significant non-cash transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2022 also included the establishment of a $90 million investment related to the Company's initial equity interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture in the first quarter of 2022.
Leases
The Company's lease obligations as of March 31, 2023 have not changed materially from the amounts reported in the 2022 Form 10-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs"). Recently issued standards were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
2. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
The Company has various equity method investments which are recorded within other non-current assets on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has certain governance rights but does not have a controlling financial or operating interest in these investments. The Company's share of equity earnings or losses related to these investments are included in the financial results of the Title Group and Owned Brokerage Group reportable segments. The Company's equity method investment balances at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Guaranteed Rate Affinity (1) | $ | 70 | | | $ | 72 | |
Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture (2) | 71 | | | 75 | |
Other Title Group equity method investments (3) | 9 | | | 10 | |
Total Title Group equity method investments | 150 | | | 157 | |
Owned Brokerage Group equity method investments (4) | 26 | | | 27 | |
Total equity method investments | $ | 176 | | | $ | 184 | |
_______________
(1)The Company's 49.9% minority-owned mortgage origination joint venture with Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
(2)The Company’s 25% equity interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture formed on March 29, 2022. During the first quarter of 2023, the Company sold a portion of its interest in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture to a third party, reducing the Company's equity interest from 26% to 25% (see Note 1, "Basis of Presentation—Sale of the Title Insurance Underwriter", for additional information).
(3)Includes Title Group's various other equity method investments. The Company received $1 million in cash dividends from these investments during the three months ended March 31, 2023.
(4)Includes the Company's former 49% investment in RealSure (operations were ceased in the fourth quarter of 2022), the Company's 50% owned unconsolidated real estate auction joint venture with Sotheby's and other brokerage related investments.
The Company recorded equity in losses (earnings) from its equity method investments during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
Guaranteed Rate Affinity | $ | 2 | | | $ | 8 | |
Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture | (1) | | | — | |
Other Title Group equity method investments | — | | | (1) | |
Owned Brokerage Group equity method investments | 1 | | | 3 | |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities | $ | 2 | | | $ | 10 | |
3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
Goodwill by reporting unit and changes in the carrying amount are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Franchise Group | | Owned Brokerage Group | | Title Group | | Total Company |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 2,392 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 2,523 | |
Goodwill acquired / reduction | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Balance at March 31, 2023 | $ | 2,392 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 2,523 | |
| | | | | | | |
Accumulated impairment losses (a) | $ | 1,561 | | | $ | 1,088 | | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 2,973 | |
_______________
(a)Includes impairment charges which reduced goodwill by $394 million during 2022, $540 million during 2020, $253 million during 2019, $1,279 million during 2008 and $507 million during 2007.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of March 31, 2023 | | As of December 31, 2022 |
| Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Amortizable—Franchise agreements (a) | $ | 2,010 | | | $ | 1,072 | | | $ | 938 | | | $ | 2,010 | | | $ | 1,056 | | | $ | 954 | |
Indefinite life—Trademarks (b) | $ | 611 | | | | | $ | 611 | | | $ | 611 | | | | | $ | 611 | |
Other Intangibles | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortizable—License agreements (c) | $ | 45 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 30 | |
Amortizable—Customer relationships (d) | 456 | | | 371 | | | 85 | | | 456 | | | 366 | | | 90 | |
Indefinite life—Title plant shares (e) | 28 | | | | | 28 | | | 28 | | | | | 28 | |
Amortizable—Other (f) | 10 | | | 9 | | | 1 | | | 11 | | | 9 | | | 2 | |
Total Other Intangibles | $ | 539 | | | $ | 395 | | | $ | 144 | | | $ | 540 | | | $ | 390 | | | $ | 150 | |
_______________
(a)Generally amortized over a period of 30 years.
(b)Primarily related to real estate franchise, title and relocation trademarks which are expected to generate future cash flows for an indefinite period of time.
(c)Relates to the Sotheby’s International Realty® and Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate agreements which are being amortized over 50 years (the contractual term of the license agreements).
(d)Relates to the customer relationships at Franchise Group, Title Group and Owned Brokerage Group. These relationships are being amortized over a period of 7 to 20 years.
(e)Ownership in a title plant is required to transact title insurance in certain states. The Company expects to generate future cash flows for an indefinite period of time.
(f)Consists of covenants not to compete which are amortized over their contract lives and other intangibles which are generally amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 5 years.
Intangible asset amortization expense is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
Franchise agreements | $ | 17 | | | $ | 17 | |
Customer relationships | 5 | | | 5 | |
Other | 1 | | | 2 | |
Total | $ | 23 | | | $ | 24 | |
Based on the Company’s amortizable intangible assets as of March 31, 2023, the Company expects related amortization expense for the remainder of 2023, the four succeeding years and thereafter to be approximately $67 million, $89 million, $89 million, $89 million, $74 million and $646 million, respectively.
4. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS AND ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current assets consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Prepaid contracts and other prepaid expenses | $ | 91 | | | $ | 81 | |
Prepaid agent incentives | 56 | | | 55 | |
Franchisee sales incentives | 30 | | | 30 | |
Other | 37 | | | 39 | |
Total other current assets | $ | 214 | | | $ | 205 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Accrued payroll and related employee costs | $ | 107 | | | $ | 110 | |
Advances from clients | 12 | | | 15 | |
Accrued volume incentives | 40 | | | 39 | |
Accrued commissions | 36 | | | 44 | |
Restructuring accruals | 19 | | | 14 | |
Deferred income | 72 | | | 62 | |
Accrued interest | 40 | | | 40 | |
Current portion of finance lease liabilities | 10 | | | 11 | |
Due to former parent | 36 | | | 20 | |
Other | 145 | | | 115 | |
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 517 | | | $ | 470 | |
5. SHORT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Total indebtedness is as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 380 | | | $ | 350 | |
Extended Term Loan A | 219 | | | 221 | |
5.75% Senior Notes | 899 | | | 899 | |
5.25% Senior Notes | 985 | | | 985 | |
0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes | 395 | | | 394 | |
Total Short-Term & Long-Term Debt | $ | 2,878 | | | $ | 2,849 | |
Securitization Obligations: | | | |
Apple Ridge Funding LLC | $ | 173 | | | $ | 163 | |
Indebtedness Table
As of March 31, 2023, the Company’s borrowing arrangements were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest Rate | | Expiration Date | | Principal Amount | | Unamortized Premium and Debt Issuance Costs | | Net Amount |
Revolving Credit Facility (1) | (2) | | July 2027 (3) | | $ | 380 | | | $ * | | $ | 380 | |
Extended Term Loan A | (4) (5) | | February 2025 | | 219 | | — | | | 219 |
Senior Notes | 5.75% | | January 2029 | | 900 | | | 1 | | | 899 | |
Senior Notes | 5.25% | | April 2030 | | 1,000 | | | 15 | | | 985 | |
Exchangeable Senior Notes | 0.25% | | June 2026 | | 403 | | | 8 | | | 395 | |
Total Short-Term & Long-Term Debt | $ | 2,902 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 2,878 | |
Securitization obligations: (6) | | | | | | | | | |
Apple Ridge Funding LLC | | June 2023 | | $ | 173 | | | $ * | | $ | 173 | |
_______________
*The debt issuance costs related to our Revolving Credit Facility and securitization obligations are classified as a deferred financing asset within other assets.
(1)As of March 31, 2023, the Company had $1,100 million of borrowing capacity under its Revolving Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2023, there were $380 million outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and $35 million of outstanding undrawn letters of credit. On May 1, 2023, the Company had $430 million outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and $36 million of outstanding undrawn letters of credit.
(2)Interest rates with respect to revolving loans under the Revolving Credit Facility at March 31, 2023 are based on, at the Company's option, (a) a term Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR")-based rate including a 10 basis point credit spread adjustment or (b) JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s prime rate ("ABR") plus (in each case) an additional margin subject to adjustment based on the then current senior secured leverage ratio. Based on the previous quarter's senior secured leverage ratio, the margin was 1.75% and the ABR margin was 0.75% for the three months ended March 31, 2023.
(3)The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility may spring forward to a date prior to July 2027 as follows: (i) if on or before March 16, 2026, the 0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes have not been extended, refinanced or replaced to have a maturity date after October 26, 2027 (or are not otherwise discharged, defeased or repaid by March 16, 2026), the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility will be March 16, 2026; and (ii) if on or before November 9, 2024, the "term A loans" under the Term Loan A Agreement have not been extended, refinanced or replaced to have a maturity date after October 26, 2027 (or are not otherwise repaid by November 9, 2024), the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility will be November 9, 2024.
(4)Interest rates with respect to outstanding borrowings under the Extended Term Loan A at March 31, 2023 are based on, at the Company's option, (a) adjusted London Interbank Offering Rate ("LIBOR") or (b) ABR plus (in each case) an additional margin subject to adjustment based on the then current senior secured leverage ratio. Based on the previous quarter's senior secured leverage ratio, the LIBOR margin was 1.75% and the ABR margin was 0.75% for the three months ended March 31, 2023.
(5)The Extended Term Loan A has quarterly amortization payments equal to a percentage per quarter of the original principal amount of $237 million, as follows: 0.625% per quarter from June 30, 2021 to March 31, 2022; 1.25% per quarter from June 30, 2022 to March 31, 2023; 1.875% per quarter from June 30, 2023 to March 31, 2024; and 2.50% per quarter for periods ending on or after June 30, 2024, with the balance of the Extended Term Loan A due at maturity on February 8, 2025.
(6)Anywhere Group currently has secured obligations through Apple Ridge Funding LLC under a securitization program which expires in June 2023. As of March 31, 2023, the Company had $200 million of borrowing capacity under the Apple Ridge Funding LLC securitization program with $173 million being utilized leaving $27 million of available capacity subject to maintaining sufficient relocation related assets to collateralize the securitization obligation. Certain of the funds that Anywhere Group receives from relocation receivables and related assets are required to be utilized to repay securitization obligations. These obligations are collateralized by $233 million and $206 million of underlying relocation receivables and other related relocation assets at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Substantially all relocation related assets are realized in less than twelve months from the transaction date. Accordingly, all of Anywhere Group's securitization obligations are classified as current in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest incurred in connection with borrowings under the facility amounted to $3 million and $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. This interest is recorded within net revenues in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as related borrowings are utilized to fund Anywhere Group's relocation operations where interest is generally earned on such assets. The securitization obligation represent floating rate debt for which the average weighted interest rate was 7.0% and 3.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Maturities Table
As of March 31, 2023, the combined aggregate amount of maturities for long-term borrowings for the remainder of 2023 and each of the next four years is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Year | | Amount |
Remaining 2023 (a) | | $ | 393 | |
2024 | | 22 | |
2025 | | 184 | |
2026 | | 403 | |
2027 | | — | |
_______________
(a)Remaining 2023 includes amortization payments totaling $13 million for the Extended Term Loan A, as well as $380 million of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility which expires in July 2027 (subject to earlier spring maturity) but is classified on the balance sheet as current due to the revolving nature and terms and conditions of the facility. The current portion of long-term debt of $398 million shown on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of four quarters of amortization payments totaling $18 million for the Extended Term Loan A and $380 million outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Loss on the Early Extinguishment of Debt
As a result of the refinancing transactions in the first quarter of 2022, the Company recorded a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $92 million, which included $80 million related to the make-whole premiums paid in connection with the early redemption of the 7.625% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and 9.375% Senior Notes, during the three months ended March 31, 2022.
6. RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Restructuring charges were $25 million and $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The components of the restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
Personnel-related costs (1) | $ | 11 | | | $ | 1 | |
Facility-related costs (2) | 14 | | | 3 | |
Total restructuring charges (3) | $ | 25 | | | $ | 4 | |
_______________ (1)Personnel-related costs consist of severance costs provided to employees who have been terminated.
(2)Facility-related costs consist of costs associated with planned facility closures such as contract termination costs, amortization of lease assets that will continue to be incurred under the contract for its remaining term without economic benefit to the Company, accelerated depreciation on asset disposals and other facility and employee relocation related costs.
(3)Restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2023 include $23 million of expense related to the Operational Efficiencies Plan and $2 million of expense related to prior restructuring plans. Restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2022 related to prior restructuring plans.
Operational Efficiencies Plan
Beginning in the third quarter of 2022, the Company commenced the implementation of a plan ("the Plan") to reduce its office footprint costs, centralize certain aspects of its operational support structure and drive changes in how it serves its affiliated independent sales agents as well as consumers from a marketing and technology perspective. Furthermore, in January 2023, the Company executed a meaningful workforce reduction driven by worsening trends in the housing market beginning in 2022. These actions build on the multiple other cost reduction and spending reprioritization initiatives such as simplified and more integrated and digitized offerings, systems and support. Delivering the Company’s business model more digitally is an increasing part of improving the consumer experience and the Company's ongoing cost focus. The Company expects to continue to prioritize investments in efforts to support its independent sales agents, franchisees and consumers which includes investments in technology and innovative products, lead generation and franchisee support.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserve balances related to the Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Personnel-related costs | | Facility-related costs | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 10 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 12 | |
Restructuring charges (1) | 11 | | | 12 | | | 23 | |
Costs paid or otherwise settled | (6) | | | (10) | | | (16) | |
Balance at March 31, 2023 | $ | 15 | | | $ | 4 | | | 19 | |
_______________(1)In addition, the Company incurred $4 million of facility-related costs for lease asset impairments in connection with the Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2023.
The following table shows the total costs currently expected to be incurred by type of cost related to the Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total amount expected to be incurred | | Amount incurred to date | | Total amount remaining to be incurred |
Personnel-related costs | $ | 27 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 2 | |
Facility-related costs | 20 | | | 18 | | | 2 | |
Total | $ | 47 | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 4 | |
The following table shows the total costs currently expected to be incurred by reportable segment related to the Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total amount expected to be incurred | | Amount incurred to date | | Total amount remaining to be incurred |
Franchise Group | $ | 8 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | — | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 32 | | | 28 | | | 4 | |
Title Group | — | | | — | | | — | |
Corporate and Other | 7 | | | 7 | | | — | |
Total | $ | 47 | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 4 | |
Prior Restructuring Plans
During 2019, the Company took various strategic initiatives to reduce costs and institute operational and facility related efficiencies to drive profitability. During 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company transitioned substantially all of its employees to a remote-work environment which allowed the Company to reevaluate its office space needs. As a result, additional facility and operational efficiencies were identified and implemented which included the transformation of its corporate headquarters in Madison, New Jersey to an open-plan innovation hub. At December 31, 2022, the remaining liability related to these initiatives was $12 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2023, the Company incurred $2 million of costs and paid or settled $4 million of costs resulting in a remaining accrual of $10 million at March 31, 2023. The remaining accrual of $10 million and total amount remaining to be incurred of $22 million primarily relate to the transformation of the Company's corporate headquarters.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings, alternative dispute resolution and governmental inquiries or regulatory actions related to alleged contract disputes, business practices, intellectual property and other commercial, employment, regulatory and tax matters, including the matters described below.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for legal matters as appropriate. The Company records litigation accruals for legal matters when it is both probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Where the reasonable estimate of the probable loss is a range, the Company records as an accrual in its financial statements the most likely estimate of the loss, or the low end of the range if there is no one best estimate. For other litigation for which a loss is reasonably possible, the Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses.
Litigation and other disputes are inherently unpredictable and subject to substantial uncertainties and unfavorable developments and resolutions could occur and even cases brought by us can involve counterclaims asserted against us. In addition, litigation and other legal matters, including class action lawsuits and regulatory proceedings challenging practices that have broad impact, can be costly to defend and, depending on the class size and claims, could be costly to settle. Insurance coverage may be unavailable for certain types of claims (including antitrust and Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") litigation) and even where available, insurance carriers may dispute coverage for various reasons, including the cost of defense, there is a deductible for each such case, and such insurance may not be sufficient to cover the losses the Company incurs.
From time to time, even if the Company believes it has substantial defenses, it may consider litigation settlements based on a variety of circumstances.
Due to the foregoing factors as well as the factors set forth below, the Company could incur charges or judgments or enter into settlements of claims, based upon future events or developments, with liabilities that are materially in excess of amounts accrued and these judgments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in any particular period. As such, an increase in accruals for one or more of these matters in any reporting period may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows for that period.
The below captioned matters address certain current litigation involving the Company, including antitrust litigation, litigation related to the TCPA, and worker classification litigation. The captioned matters described herein involve evolving, complex litigation and the Company assesses its accruals on an ongoing basis taking into account the procedural stage and developments in the litigation. One of the antitrust class action matters (the Burnett litigation) is scheduled to go to a jury trial in October 2023 and the TCPA class action, which had been scheduled for a jury trial in May 2023, has been postponed to the fall of 2023. Additionally, on March 29, 2023, class certification was granted in the Moehrl antitrust class action, which contains allegations and damages theories similar to, but not the same as, the Burnett litigation but with a class that is substantially larger than the class certified in the Burnett litigation.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in each of these matters, believes it has substantial defenses against plaintiffs' claims and is vigorously defending these actions.
All of these matters are presented as currently captioned, but as noted elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, Realogy Holdings Corp. has been renamed Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
Antitrust Litigation
The cases included under this header, Antitrust Litigation, are class actions that challenge residential real estate industry rules and practices for payment of buyer broker commissions. The issues raised by these cases have not been previously adjudicated, and the cases are pending in multiple jurisdictions, are at various stages of litigation, claim to cover lengthy periods, involve different assertions with respect to liability and damages, include federal and certain state law claims, involve numerous and differing parties, and—given that antitrust laws generally provide for joint and several liability and treble damages—could result in a broad range of outcomes, making it difficult to predict possible damages or how legal, factual and damages issues will be resolved.
These factors also complicate the potential for achieving settlement in individual cases or any global multi-party settlement although the Company believes, given the industry-wide impacts of the issues being litigated, potential resolution options should be considered.
The Company believes that additional antitrust litigation may be possible depending on decisions in pending litigation or regulatory developments affecting the industry.
In each of these cases, plaintiffs claim damages for all or a meaningful portion of the buyer brokers’ commission paid in each transaction irrespective of the fact that the Company retained relatively little of those commissions (as the vast majority of the commission remained with the independent sales agent and/or franchisee, as applicable).
Burnett, Hendrickson, Breit, Trupiano, and Keel v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri). This is a now-certified class action complaint, which was filed on April 29, 2019 and amended on June 21, 2019, June 30, 2021 and May 6, 2022 (formerly captioned as Sitzer).
The plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a continuing contract, combination, or conspiracy to unreasonably restrain trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act because defendant NAR allegedly established mandatory anticompetitive policies and rules for the multiple listing services and its member brokers that require listing brokers to make an offer of buyer broker compensation when listing a property. The plaintiffs' experts argue that "but for" the challenged NAR policies and rules, these offers of buyer broker compensation would not be made and plaintiffs seek the recovery of any commissions paid to buyers’ brokers as to both brokerage and franchised operations in the relevant geographic area.
The plaintiffs further allege that commission sharing, which provides for the broker representing the seller sharing or paying a portion of its commission to the broker representing the buyer, is anticompetitive and violates the Sherman Act, and that the brokerage/franchisor defendants conspired with NAR by requiring their respective brokerages/franchisees to comply with NAR’s policies, rules, and Code of Ethics, and engaged in other allegedly anticompetitive conduct including, but not limited to, steering and agent education that allegedly promotes the practice of paying buyer broker compensation and discourages commission negotiation. Plaintiffs’ experts dispute defendants’ contention that the practice of offering and paying buyer broker compensation is based on natural and legitimate economic incentives and benefits that exist irrespective of the challenged NAR policies and rules and also contend that international practices are comparable benchmarks.
The antitrust claims in the Burnett litigation are limited both in allegations and relief sought to home sellers who from April 29, 2015, to the present used a listing broker affiliated with one of the brokerage/franchisor defendants in four MLSs that primarily serve the State of Missouri, purportedly in violation of federal and Missouri antitrust laws. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from requiring home sellers to pay buyer broker commissions or from otherwise restricting competition among brokers, an award of damages and/or restitution for the class period, attorneys' fees and costs of suit. Plaintiffs allege joint and several liability and seek treble damages.
In addition, the plaintiffs include a cause of action for alleged violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, or MMPA, on behalf of Missouri residents only, with a class period that commences April 29, 2014. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from engaging in conduct in violation of the MMPA, an award of damages and/or restitution for the class period, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, and costs of suit.
On August 22, 2019, the Court denied defendants’ motions to transfer the litigation to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and on October 16, 2019, the Court denied the motions to dismiss this litigation filed respectively by NAR and the Company (together with the other named brokerage/franchisor defendants). In September 2019, the Department of Justice ("DOJ") filed a statement of interest and appearances for this matter and, in July 2020 and July 2021, requested the Company provide it with all materials produced in this matter.
The Court granted class certification on April 22, 2022. The Company's petition for an interlocutory appeal of the class certification decision was denied by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on June 2, 2022. The class the Court has certified includes, according to plaintiffs, over 310,000 transactions for which the plaintiffs are seeking a full refund of the buyer brokers’ commissions. On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a decision denying the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this matter. The Court’s summary-judgment decision holds that plaintiffs have adduced evidence to support their contention that the challenged rules constitute per se violations of the Sherman Act. Because other courts considering similar antitrust challenges to MLS rules have held that such rules cannot be treated as per se violations, the defendants filed a motion asking the Court to certify the issue for a discretionary interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, but the motion was denied by the Court on January 27, 2023.
On December 29, 2022 the court also entered an order directing the parties to conduct a mediation no later than March 15, 2023. On February 6, the court was advised that the parties had participated in the court-ordered mediation. This case had been scheduled to go to trial in February 2023. The court has now continued the trial until October 2023.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to both plaintiffs’ claims and damage assertions, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Moehrl, Cole, Darnell, Ramey, Umpa and Ruh v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, The Long & Foster Companies, Inc., RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). The complaint, which was filed on March 6, 2019, contains allegations and requests relief substantially similar to the Burnett litigation. The Moehrl plaintiffs seek both damages and injunctive relief. In contrast to the Burnett plaintiffs, the Moehrl plaintiffs acknowledge that there are economic reasons why a seller would offer buyer compensation (and accordingly, do not seek recovery of all commissions
paid to buyers’ brokers), although plaintiffs allege that buyer brokers are overpaid due to the mandatory nature of the applicable NAR policies and rules.
On March 29, 2023, the Court certified two classes in this litigation—a damages class and an injunctive class. The damages class covers sellers of residential real estate (with certain exceptions) who paid a commission to a brokerage affiliated with a corporate defendant beginning from March 6, 2015 through December 31, 2020 in 20 MLSs in various parts of the country that do not overlap with the Burnett MLSs and that include approximately five of the country's ten largest MLSs. The injunctive class covers current and future sellers of residential real estate (with certain exceptions) who are presently listing or will in the future list their home for sale in one of the 20 MLSs. The Moehrl damages class covers an estimated 3.5 million transactions, substantially larger than the class certified in Burnett (which, as further described above, includes over 310,000 transactions), though as noted above, in contrast to the Burnett plaintiffs, the Moehrl plaintiffs do not seek to recover all commissions paid to buyers' brokers.
On April 12, 2023, the Company and the other defendants filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to pursue an interlocutory appeal of the decision on class certification, but there is no assurance such appeal will be granted. Merit expert discovery in the case is ongoing.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to both plaintiffs’ claims and damage assertions, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Batton, Bolton, Brace, Kim, James, Mullis, Bisbicos and Parsons v. The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, The Long & Foster Companies, Inc., RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division). In this putative nationwide class action filed on January 25, 2021 (formerly captioned as Leeder), the plaintiffs take issue with certain NAR policies, including those related to buyer broker compensation at issue in the Moehrl and Burnett matters, as well as those at issue in the 2020 settlement between the DOJ and NAR, but claim the alleged conspiracy has harmed buyers (instead of sellers). The plaintiffs allege that the defendants made agreements and engaged in a conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act and were unjustly enriched, and seek a permanent injunction enjoining NAR from establishing in the future the same or similar rules, policies, or practices as those challenged in the action as well as an award of damages and/or restitution, interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
On May 2, 2022, the Court granted the motion to dismiss filed by the Company (together with the other companies named in the complaint) without prejudice. On July 6, 2022, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint substituting in eight new named plaintiffs and no longer naming Leeder as named plaintiff, that may consequently be referred to as Batton v. The National Association of Realtors, et al. The amended complaint is substantially similar to the original complaint but, in addition to the federal Sherman Act and unjust enrichment claims, plaintiffs have added two claims based on certain state antitrust statutes and consumer protection statutes. The Company (together with the other companies named in the complaint) filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on September 7, 2022. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion was filed October 21, 2022, and defendants’ reply was filed on November 22, 2022; that fully briefed motion to dismiss remains pending. Discovery has not commenced.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to plaintiffs’ claims, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Nosalek, Hirschorn and Hirschorn v. MLS Property Information Network, Inc., Realogy Holdings Corp., Homeservices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts). This is a putative class action filed on December 17, 2020 (formerly captioned as Bauman), wherein the plaintiffs take issue with policies and rules similar to those at issue in the Moehrl and Burnett matters, but rather than objecting to the national policies and rules published by NAR, this lawsuit specifically objects to the alleged policies and rules of a multiple listing service (MLS Property Information Network, Inc.) that is owned by realtors, including in part by one of the Company's company-owned brokerages. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants made agreements and engaged in a conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act and seek a permanent injunction, enjoining the defendants from continuing conduct determined to be unlawful, as well as an award of damages and/or restitution, interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses. On December 10, 2021, the Court denied the motion to dismiss filed in March 2021 by the Company (together with the other defendants named in the complaint). On March 1, 2022, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint substituting in two new named plaintiffs and no longer naming the Baumans as named plaintiffs, that may consequently be referred to as Nosalek v. MLS Property Information Network, Inc. On January 9, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint which, among other things, added certain entities as defendants,
including certain Anywhere wholly-owned franchisor subsidiaries, removed the Count II state law claims that the plaintiffs had previously voluntarily dismissed, and redefined the covered area as limited to home sales in Massachusetts (removing New Hampshire and Rhode Island). The lawsuit seeks to represent a class of sellers who paid a broker commission in connection with the sale of a property listed in the MLS Property Information Network, Inc. On January 23, 2023, MLS Property Information Network, Inc., HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC, HSF Affiliates, LLC, RE/MAX LLC, and Keller Williams Realty, Inc. filed their answer to the second amended complaint. The Anywhere defendants filed their answer to the second amended complaint on February 21, 2023. Discovery in the case has commenced.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to plaintiffs’ claims, and is vigorously defending this litigation.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
Bumpus, et al. v. Realogy Holdings Corp., et al. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division). In this class action filed on June 11, 2019, against Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (f/k/a Realogy Holdings Corp.), Anywhere Intermediate Holdings LLC (f/k/a Realogy Intermediate Holdings LLC), Anywhere Real Estate Group LLC (f/k/a Realogy Group LLC ), Anywhere Real Estate Services Group LLC (f/k/a Realogy Services Group LLC), and Anywhere Advisors LLC (f/k/a Realogy Brokerage Group LLC and NRT LLC), and Mojo Dialing Solutions, LLC, plaintiffs allege that independent sales agents affiliated with Anywhere Advisors LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) using dialers provided by Mojo and others. Plaintiffs seek relief on behalf of a National Do Not Call Registry class, an Internal Do Not Call class, and an Artificial or Prerecorded Message class.
In March 2022, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification for the foregoing classes as to the Anywhere defendants but not as to co-defendant Mojo and dismissed Mojo from the case. Plaintiffs and the Anywhere defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment were denied without prejudice on May 11, 2022. The Company's petition for permission to appeal the class certification filed with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was denied and the plaintiffs’ class notice plan was approved on May 26, 2022.
A mediation between the parties in August 2022 did not result in resolution of this matter. On January 18, 2023, the Court set a trial date of May 15, 2023 and a hearing and pretrial conference for April 27, 2023.
Plaintiffs had claimed that approximately 1.2 million Do Not Call calls and approximately 265,000 Pre-Recorded Messages qualified for inclusion in the classes, but on March 29, 2023, filed a motion to narrow the classes to approximately 321,000 Do Not Call calls and approximately 165,000 Pre-Recorded Messages. On April 12, 2023, the Company opposed Plaintiffs' motion to modify the classes and sought to decertify them. On April 24, 2023, the Court vacated the April 27th hearing and pretrial conference and the jury trial set to commence on May 15, 2023, and requested that the parties propose by May 22, 2023, a trial date in the fall of 2023. Plaintiffs' motion to narrow the classes, as well as other pre-trial motions, are pending.
The Company disputes the allegations against it in this case, believes it has substantial defenses to both plaintiffs’ liability claims and damage assertions, and is vigorously defending this action.
Worker Classification Litigation
Whitlach v. Premier Valley, Inc. d/b/a Century 21 M&M and Century 21 Real Estate LLC (Superior Court of California, Stanislaus County). This was filed as a putative class action complaint on December 20, 2018 by plaintiff James Whitlach against Premier Valley Inc., a Century 21 Real Estate independently-owned franchisee doing business as Century 21 M&M ("Century 21 M&M"). The complaint also names Century 21 Real Estate LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the franchisor of Century 21 Real Estate ("Century 21"), as an alleged joint employer of the franchisee’s independent sales agents and seeks to certify a class that could potentially include all agents of both Century 21 M&M and Century 21 in California. In February 2019, the plaintiff amended his complaint to assert claims pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA"). Following the Court's dismissal of the plaintiff's non-PAGA claims without prejudice in June 2019, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint asserting one cause of action for alleged civil penalties under PAGA in June 2020 and continued to pursue his PAGA claims as a representative of purported "aggrieved employees" as defined by PAGA. As such representative, the plaintiff seeks all non-individualized relief available to the purported aggrieved employees under PAGA, as well as attorneys’ fees. Under California law, PAGA claims are generally not subject to arbitration and may result in exposure in the form of additional penalties.
In the second amended complaint, the plaintiff continues to allege that Century 21 M&M misclassified all of its independent real estate agents, salespeople, sales professionals, broker associates and other similar positions as independent contractors, failed to pay minimum wages, failed to provide meal and rest breaks, failed to pay timely wages, failed to keep proper records, failed to provide appropriate wage statements, made unlawful deductions from wages, and failed to reimburse plaintiff and the putative class for business related expenses, resulting in violations of the California Labor Code. The demurrer filed by Century 21 M&M (and joined by Century 21) on August 3, 2020 to the plaintiff's amended complaint, was granted by the Court on November 10, 2020, dismissing the case without leave to replead. In January 2021, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s order granting the demurrer and filed its brief in support of the appeal in June 2021. In October 2021, Century 21 and Century 21 M&M filed their appellate brief in opposition to plaintiff’s appeal and in January 2022, plaintiff filed its reply brief in support of the appeal. In September 2022, Century 21 and Century 21 M&M filed a motion with the Appellate Court to dismiss the appeal in favor of arbitration in response to a recent change in the law, which the plaintiff opposed. On November 18, 2022, the Appellate Court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s grant of the demurrer to Century 21 M&M and Century 21 (and, therefore, found the motion requesting arbitration to be moot). Plaintiff's petition for rehearing filed with the Appellate Court was denied on December 5, 2022 and, on January 26, 2023, plaintiff filed a petition for review of the Appellate Court’s ruling with the Supreme Court of the State of California. On March 22, 2023, the Supreme Court of the State of California denied Plaintiff's petition for review.
Other
Examples of other legal matters involving the Company may include but are not limited to:
•antitrust and anti-competition claims;
•TCPA claims;
•claims alleging violations of RESPA, state consumer fraud statutes, federal consumer protection statutes or other state real estate law violations;
•employment law claims, including claims that independent residential real estate sales agents engaged by our company owned brokerages or by affiliated franchisees—under certain state or federal laws—are potentially employees instead of independent contractors, and they or regulators therefore may bring claims against our Owned Brokerage Group for breach of contract, wage and hour classification claims, wrongful discharge, unemployment and workers' compensation and could seek benefits, back wages, overtime, indemnification, penalties related to classification practices and expense reimbursement available to employees or make similar claims against Franchise Group as an alleged joint employer of an affiliated franchisee’s independent sales agents;
•other employment law matters, including other types of worker classification claims as well as wage and hour claims and retaliation claims;
•information security claims, including claims under new and emerging data privacy laws related to the protection of customer, employee or third-party information;
•cyber-crime claims, including claims related to the diversion of homesale transaction closing funds;
•vicarious or joint liability claims based upon the conduct of individuals or entities traditionally outside of our control, including franchisees and independent sales agents, under joint employer claims or other theories of actual or apparent agency;
•claims by current or former franchisees that franchise agreements were breached, including improper terminations;
•claims generally against the company owned brokerage operations for negligence, misrepresentation or breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the performance of real estate brokerage or other professional services as well as other brokerage claims associated with listing information and property history;
•claims related to intellectual property or copyright law, including infringement actions alleging improper use of copyrighted photographs on websites or in marketing materials without consent of the copyright holder or claims challenging our trademarks;
•claims concerning breach of obligations to make websites and other services accessible for consumers with disabilities;
•claims against the title agent contending that the agent knew or should have known that a transaction was fraudulent or that the agent was negligent in addressing title defects or conducting the settlement;
•claims related to disclosure or securities law violations as well as derivative suits; and
•fraud, defalcation or misconduct claims.
Other ordinary course legal proceedings that may arise from time to time include those related to commercial arrangements, indemnification (under contract or common law), franchising arrangements, the fiduciary duties of brokers, standard brokerage disputes like the failure to disclose accurate square footage or hidden defects in the property such as mold, claims under the False Claims Act (or similar state laws), consumer lending and debt collection law claims, state auction law, and violations of similar laws in countries where we operate around the world with respect to any of the foregoing. In addition, with the increasing requirements resulting from government laws and regulations concerning data breach notifications and data privacy and protection obligations, claims associated with these laws may become more common. While most litigation involves claims against the Company, from time to time the Company commences litigation, including litigation against former employees, franchisees and competitors when it alleges that such persons or entities have breached agreements or engaged in other wrongful conduct.
* * *
Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Guarantees to Cendant and Affiliates
Anywhere Group (then Realogy Corporation) separated from Cendant on July 31, 2006 (the "Separation"), pursuant to a plan by Cendant (now known as Avis Budget Group, Inc.) to separate into four independent companies—one for each of Cendant's business units—real estate services (Anywhere Group, formerly referred to as Realogy Group), travel distribution services ("Travelport"), hospitality services, including timeshare resorts ("Wyndham Worldwide"), and vehicle rental ("Avis Budget Group"). Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of July 27, 2006 among Cendant, Anywhere Group, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport (the "Separation and Distribution Agreement"), each of Anywhere Group, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport have assumed certain contingent and other corporate liabilities (and related costs and expenses), which are primarily related to each of their respective businesses. In addition, Anywhere Group has assumed 62.5% and Wyndham Worldwide has assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities (and related costs and expenses) of Cendant. The due to former parent balance was $36 million at March 31, 2023 and $20 million at December 31, 2022, respectively. The due to former parent balance was comprised of the Company’s portion of the following: (i) Cendant’s remaining contingent tax liabilities, (ii) potential liabilities related to Cendant’s terminated or divested businesses, and (iii) potential liabilities related to the residual portion of accruals for Cendant operations.
In December 2022, a hearing was held with the California Office of Tax Appeals ("OTA") on a Cendant legacy tax matter involving Avis Budget Group that related to a 1999 transaction. The case presented two issues: (i) whether the notices of proposed assessment issued by the California Franchise Tax Board were barred by the statute of limitations; and (ii) whether a transaction undertaken by Avis Budget Group in tax year 1999 constituted a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code. In March 2023, the OTA decided in favor of the California Franchise Tax Board on both issues. As a result, the Company has increased the reserve for this legacy tax matter in the first quarter of 2023. The OTA’s opinion is not final, and the Company has filed a petition for rehearing and continues to vigorously pursue this matter.
Tax Matters
The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes and recording related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities whereby the outcome of the audits is uncertain. The Company believes there is appropriate support for positions taken on its tax returns. The liabilities that have been recorded represent the best estimates of the probable loss on certain positions and are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter. However, the outcomes of tax audits are inherently uncertain.
Escrow and Trust Deposits
As a service to its customers, the Company administers escrow and trust deposits which represent undisbursed amounts received for the settlement of real estate transactions. Deposits at FDIC-insured institutions are insured up to $250,000. These escrow and trust deposits totaled approximately $820 million at March 31, 2023 and while these deposits are not assets of the Company (and therefore are excluded from the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets), the Company remains contingently liable for the disposition of these deposits.
8. EQUITY
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for Anywhere
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Non- controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
|
|
| Shares | | Amount | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | 109.5 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 4,805 | | | $ | (2,994) | | | $ | (48) | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 1,767 | |
Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (138) | | | — | | | — | | | (138) | |
Other comprehensive income | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation | — | | | — | | | 4 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4 | |
Issuance of shares for vesting of equity awards | 1.4 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Shares withheld for taxes on equity awards | (0.5) | | | — | | | (4) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2023 | 110.4 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 4,805 | | | $ | (3,132) | | | $ | (47) | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 1,630 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Non- controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
|
|
| Shares | | Amount | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | 116.6 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 4,947 | | | $ | (2,712) | | | $ | (50) | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 2,192 | |
Cumulative effect adjustment due to the adoption of ASU 2020-06 | — | | | — | | | (53) | | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | (48) | |
Net income | — | | | — | | | — | | | 23 | | | — | | | — | | | 23 | |
Other comprehensive income | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
Exercise of stock options | 0.1 | | | — | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2 | |
Stock-based compensation | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6 | |
Issuance of shares for vesting of equity awards | 2.3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Shares withheld for taxes on equity awards | (0.9) | | | — | | | (16) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (16) | |
Dividends | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3) | | | (3) | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | 118.1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 4,886 | | | $ | (2,684) | | | $ | (49) | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 2,157 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for Anywhere Group
The Company has not included a statement of changes in equity for Anywhere Group as the operating results of Anywhere Group are consistent with the operating results of Anywhere as all revenue and expenses of Anywhere Group flow up to Anywhere and there are no incremental activities at the Anywhere level. The only difference between Anywhere Group and Anywhere is that the $1 million in par value of common stock in Anywhere's equity is included in additional paid-in capital in Anywhere Group's equity.
Stock Repurchases
The Company may repurchase shares of its common stock under authorizations from its Board of Directors. Shares repurchased are retired and not displayed separately as treasury stock on the consolidated financial statements. The par value of the shares repurchased and retired is deducted from common stock and the excess of the purchase price over par value is first charged against any available additional paid-in capital with the balance charged to retained earnings. Direct costs incurred to repurchase the shares are included in the total cost of the shares.
The Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $300 million of the Company's common stock in February 2022. The Company has not repurchased any shares under the share repurchase programs since 2022. As of March 31, 2023, $203 million remained available for repurchase under the share repurchase program.
Stock-Based Compensation
During the first quarter of 2023, the Company granted restricted stock units related to 1.5 million shares with a weighted average grant date fair value of $5.80 and performance stock units related to 1.5 million shares with a weighted
average grant date fair value of $4.76. The Company granted all time-based equity awards in the form of restricted stock units which are subject to ratable vesting over a three-year period.
Effective February 27, 2023, the Board approved, subject to stockholder approval at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Second Amended and Restated Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (f/k/a Realogy Holdings Corp.) 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Second A&R 2018 LTIP"), increasing the number of shares reserved thereunder by 5 million. The stockholders approved the Second A&R 2018 LTIP at the May 3, 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Anywhere
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed based on net income (loss) attributable to Anywhere stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed consistently with the basic computation plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares include shares that the Company could be obligated to issue from its Exchangeable Senior Notes and warrants if dilutive (see Note 5, "Short and Long-Term Debt", for further discussion) and outstanding stock-based compensation awards. For purposes of computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share, weighted average common shares do not include potentially dilutive common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As such, the shares that the Company could be obligated to issue from its stock options, warrants and Exchangeable Senior Notes are excluded from the earnings (loss) per share calculation if the exercise or exchangeable price exceeds the average market price of common shares.
The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate the dilutive effect of outstanding stock-based compensation. If dilutive, the Company uses the if converted method to calculate the dilutive effect of its Exchangeable Senior Notes. These notes will have a dilutive impact when the average market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the initial exchange price of $24.49 per share. The Exchangeable Senior Notes were not dilutive as of March 31, 2023 as the closing price of the Company's common stock as of March 31, 2023 was less than the initial exchange price.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
(In millions, except per share data) | 2023 | | 2022 |
Numerator: | | | |
Net (loss) income attributable to Anywhere shareholders | $ | (138) | | | $ | 23 | |
Denominator: | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (denominator for basic (loss) earnings per share calculation) | 109.8 | | | 117.1 | |
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards (a) | — | | | 3.3 | |
Dilutive effect of Exchangeable Senior Notes and warrants (b) | — | | | — | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per share calculation) | 109.8 | | | 120.4 | |
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to Anywhere shareholders: |
Basic (loss) earnings per share | $ | (1.26) | | | $ | 0.20 | |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share | $ | (1.26) | | | $ | 0.19 | |
_______________(a)The Company was in a net loss position for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and therefore the impact of incentive equity awards was excluded from the computation of dilutive loss per share as the inclusion of such amounts would be anti-dilutive. The three months ended March 31, 2022 exclude 3.5 million shares of common stock issuable for incentive equity awards which includes performance share units based on the achievement of target amounts that are anti-dilutive to the diluted earnings per share computation.
(b)Shares to be provided to the Company from the exchangeable note hedge transactions purchased concurrently with its issuance of Exchangeable Senior Notes are anti-dilutive and therefore they are not treated as a reduction to its diluted shares.
10. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The reportable segments presented below represent the Company’s segments for which separate financial information is available and which is utilized on a regular basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of services provided by its segments.
Management evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable segments based upon revenue and Operating EBITDA. Operating EBITDA is defined by us as net income (loss) before depreciation and amortization, interest expense, net (other than relocation services interest for securitization assets and securitization obligations), income taxes, and other items that are not core to the operating activities of the Company such as restructuring charges, former parent legacy items, gains or losses on the early extinguishment of debt, impairments, gains or losses on discontinued operations and gains or losses on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets. The Company’s presentation of Operating EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues (a) |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
Franchise Group | $ | 207 | | | $ | 267 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | 915 | | | 1,264 | |
Title Group | 72 | | | 190 | |
Corporate and Other (b) | (63) | | | (86) | |
Total Company | $ | 1,131 | | | $ | 1,635 | |
_______________
(a)Transactions between segments are eliminated in consolidation. Revenues for Franchise Group include intercompany royalties and marketing fees paid by Owned Brokerage Group of $63 million and $86 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Such amounts are eliminated through the Corporate and Other line.
(b)Includes the elimination of transactions between segments.
Set forth in the table below is Operating EBITDA presented by reportable segment and a reconciliation to Net (loss) income attributable to Anywhere and Anywhere Group for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating EBITDA |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
Franchise Group | $ | 97 | | | $ | 138 | |
Owned Brokerage Group | (75) | | | (40) | |
Title Group | (17) | | | (3) | |
Corporate and Other (a) | (57) | | | (26) | |
Total Company | $ | (52) | | | $ | 69 | |
| | | |
Less: Depreciation and amortization | 50 | | | 51 | |
Interest expense, net | 38 | | | 18 | |
Income tax (benefit) expense | (46) | | | 12 | |
Restructuring costs, net (b) | 25 | | | 4 | |
Impairments (c) | 4 | | | — | |
Former parent legacy cost, net (d) | 16 | | | — | |
Loss on the early extinguishment of debt (d) | — | | | 92 | |
Gain on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets, net (e) | (1) | | | (131) | |
Net (loss) income attributable to Anywhere and Anywhere Group | $ | (138) | | | $ | 23 | |
_______________
(a)Includes the elimination of transactions between segments.
(b)The three months ended March 31, 2023 includes restructuring charges of $6 million at Franchise Group, $14 million at Owned Brokerage Group and $5 million at Corporate and Other.
The three months ended March 31, 2022 includes restructuring charges of $1 million at Franchise Group, $2 million at Owned Brokerage Group and $1 million at Corporate and Other.
(c)Impairments primarily relate to non-cash lease asset impairments.
(d)Former parent legacy items and Loss on the early extinguishment of debt are recorded in Corporate and Other. Former parent legacy cost relates to recent developments in a legacy tax matter in the first quarter of 2023.
(e)Gain on the sale of businesses, investments or other assets, net is recorded in Title Group and related to the sale of a portion of the Company's ownership in the Title Insurance Underwriter Joint Venture during the first quarter of 2023 and the sale of the Title Underwriter during the first quarter of 2022.