The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) is a medical device company predominantly focused on eye care. A majority of our revenue comes from Avenova®, an FDA cleared product sold in the United States that has proven in laboratory testing to have broad antimicrobial properties as it removes foreign material including microorganisms and debris from skin around the eye, including the eyelid. Avenova is formulated with our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid. Avenova is available directly to consumers through our online sales channel and is also often prescribed and dispensed by eyecare professionals for blepharitis and dry-eye disease.

We continue to promote Avenova through all four of our primary distribution channels: (1) our over-the-counter direct-to-consumer model, allowing customers to purchase either online or at select brick and mortar stores; (2) retail pharmacies, dispensing Avenova to patients through national pharmacy chains across all 50 states; (3) our Partner Pharmacy Program, providing a consistent patient experience at contracted pricing; and (4) our physician dispensed channel, allowing patients to buy Avenova during office visits to their preferred eye care specialist.

Avenova was launched as a prescription only product in 2016. To expand our addressable market, we launched Avenova as an over-the-counter product during the second quarter of 2019. By creating a consumer driven product that does not require a doctor’s prescription, we made Avenova available to many more potential customers. Over-the-counter Avenova also capitalizes on a trend to sell over-the-counter pharmaceutical products directly to consumers and adds convenience by allowing customers to forego a time-consuming doctor visit and trip to the pharmacy.

The launch of over-the-counter Avenova online proved to be especially fortuitous during the COVID-19 pandemic as it allowed consumers to order Avenova online without a prescription and without leaving their homes.

Over-the-counter Avenova is now our leading product by unit sales and net revenue despite having a lower average net selling price than Avenova sold through pharmacy channels. This sales performance reflects our ongoing focus and spend on digital marketing, social media and public relations initiatives to promote Avenova directly to the end consumer. Avenova is available on Amazon.com, Walmart.com, and Avenova.com. Beginning in February 2021, Avenova became available at CVS store locations throughout the U.S. and on CVS.com, one of the nation’s largest retail chains.

Although we expect the online sales channel to continue to be our fastest-growing channel, support for Avenova from the medical community is important to maintaining its reputation as a preferred product. The “doctor recommended” halo effect around our brand remains strong due in part to our continued promotion of prescription Avenova.

Earlier this year, we launched a rebranded CelleRx® into the beauty industry as CelleRx® Clinical Reset™. Clinical Reset is formulated with NovaBay’s patented, pure, prescription-grade hypochlorous acid, a naturally occurring oxidant that is also produced by white blood cells within the human body. It keeps the skin’s natural barrier intact, which when out of balance can allow acne, rosacea and infection to set in.  Clinical Reset is complementary to a daily beauty regime for use on clean skin or over makeup.

Beyond Avenova and CelleRx, we have developed additional products containing our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid, including NeutroPhase® and PhaseOne® for the wound care market. NeutroPhase is only sold in China through our exclusive distributor, Pioneer Pharma Co. Ltd. PhaseOne is only sold in the United States through our exclusive distributor, PhaseOne Health, LLC.

Last year, we responded to the national need for protective personal equipment (“PPE”) by tapping into our international supply network and launching the sale of third-party manufactured disposable KN95 facial coverings (“KN95 Masks”) and other PPE. Although sales from the KN95 Masks were significant in the second quarter of 2020, we subsequently experienced a significant decrease in PPE sales as supply shortages narrowed, prices declined and distribution competition increased. We have returned our focus to our core business in eyecare and we do not anticipate dedicating significant future Company resources toward the sale of PPE and we do not expect significant future revenue from PPE sales.

During the second quarter of this year, we introduced two complementary products to support the use of Avenova. Our Warm Eye Compress not only provides effective heat therapy for many eye conditions, but it also improves Avenova’s ability to restore the eyes’ natural defenses against tear evaporation. Additionally, the i-Chek Illuminated Eye Examination Mirror (“i-Chek”) allows Avenova customers to get a closer look at common eye conditions that are often of concern to Avenova customers. These eye conditions include blepharitis, chalazion and styes. The i-Chek also helps Avenova users who suffer from dry eye to identify dirt, oil or debris that need to be removed from the eyelids and eyelashes for optimum ocular health. The use of Avenova and both products is meant to provide Avenova customers with a holistic approach to lid and lash hygiene.

Liquidity

Based on our funds available on  September 30, 2021, as well as the proceeds from the Company’s private placement of its Series B Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock and common stock warrants that was completed on November 2, 2021, management believes that the Company’s existing cash and cash equivalents and cash flows generated from product sales will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its planned operating expenses at least through November 12, 2022, including the cost to acquire and integrate DERMAdoctor. See Note 18, “DERMAdoctor LLC Transaction”. However, changing circumstances may cause the Company to expend cash significantly faster than currently anticipated, and the Company may need to spend more cash than currently expected because of circumstances beyond its control. Additionally, our future results, cash expenditures and ability to obtain additional external financing could be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and general adverse economic conditions.

NOTE 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates include contract liabilities related to product sales, useful lives for property and equipment and related depreciation calculations, assumptions for valuing options and warrants, income taxes and other contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the periods presented.

The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The condensed consolidated results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or for any other future year or interim period. 

The financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2020, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on March 25, 2021.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

The Company considers all highly-liquid instruments with a stated maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. As of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held in a highly-rated, major financial institution in the United States.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the same reported in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

The restricted cash amount included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets represents amounts held as certificates of deposit for Company credit cards and lease arrangements as contractually required by our financial institution and landlord.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Partners

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. The Company maintains deposits of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash with a highly-rated, major financial institution in the United States. 

Deposits in this bank may exceed the amount of federal insurance provided on such deposits. The Company does not believe it is exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the financial institution in which the deposits are held. 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, Company revenues were derived primarily from sales of Avenova. During the nine months ended 2020, revenues during the second quarter of that period were derived primarily from sales of KN95 Masks in response to the national need for PPE.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, revenues from each product were as follows (in thousands):

During the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, sales of Avenova via Amazon comprised 55% and 47% of total Avenova net revenue, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, sales of Avenova via Amazon comprised 57% and 46% of total Avenova net revenue, respectively. No other individual distributor comprised greater than 10% of total Avenova net revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.

As of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, accounts receivable from our major distribution partners greater than 10% were as follows:

The Company relies on two contract manufacturers to produce its products. The Company does not own any manufacturing facilities and intends to continue to rely on third parties for the supply of finished goods. Contract manufacturers may or may not be able to meet the Company’s needs with respect to timing, quantity or quality. In particular, it is possible that we may suffer from unexpected supply chain delays in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The Company follows Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, with respect to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and nonrecurring basis. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The standard also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable; and

Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions).

Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company charges bad debt expense and records an allowance for doubtful accounts when management believes it to be unlikely that specific invoices will be collected. Management identifies amounts due that are in dispute and it believes are unlikely to be collected. At September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, management recorded no reserve for accounts receivable.

Inventory

Inventory is comprised of (1) raw materials and supplies, such as bottles, packaging materials, labels, boxes and pumps; (2) goods in progress, which are normally filled but unlabeled bottles; and (3) finished goods. We utilize contract manufacturers to produce our products and the price paid to these manufacturers is included in inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value determined by the first-in, first-out method. At both September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, management had recorded an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory and lower of cost or estimated net realizable value adjustments of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.  

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets of five to seven years for office equipment, three years for computer equipment and software, and seven years for furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term.

The costs of normal maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements are expensed as incurred. 

Leases

At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow, on a collateralized basis over a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use assets may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or incentives received.

The Company has elected to combine lease and non-lease components as a single component for all leases in which it is a lessee or a lessor. The lease expense is recognized over the expected term on a straight-line basis. Operating leases are recognized on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities current and operating lease liabilities non-current. As a result, as of the effective date, the Company no longer recognizes deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheets.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, requires that an entity's change in equity or net assets during a period from transactions and other events from non-owner sources be reported.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue generated through the Company’s webstores, Avenova.com and CelleRx.com, for Avenova and CelleRx (as well as the KN95 Masks) is recognized upon fulfillment, which generally occurs upon delivery of the related products to multiple third-party carriers. Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. We present revenue net of sales taxes and refunds.

Revenue generated through Amazon.com and Walmart.com is recognized upon fulfillment, which generally occurs upon delivery of the related products to a third-party carrier. We present revenue net of commissions and any related fulfillment and shipping fees charged by these partners. Fees paid to partners for promoting our products are expensed as incurred and are included in sales and marketing expenses within the operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The Company also generates Avenova product revenue through product sales to its major distribution partners. Product supply of Avenova is the only performance obligation contained in these arrangements, and the Company recognizes product revenue upon transfer of control to its major distribution partners at the amount of consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to, generally upon receipt by the distributor on a “sell-in” basis. Upon recognition of product sales, contract liabilities are recorded for invoiced amounts that are subject to significant reversal, including product revenue allowances for cash consideration paid to customers for services, discounts, rebate programs, and product returns. The Company derives its rate of return from historical data and updates its return rate assumption quarterly. Payment for product supply is typically due 30 days after control transfers to the distributor.

Revenue generated through the Company’s partner pharmacies is recognized when control of the product transfers to the end customer. Revenue for product sales to CVS is recognized upon transfer of control to CVS, which generally occurs upon delivery of the related products to a third-party carrier, net of estimated future product returns.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold includes third-party manufacturing costs, shipping and handling costs, and other costs associated with products sold. Cost of goods sold also includes any necessary allowance for excess and obsolete inventory along with lower of cost and estimated net realizable value.

Research and Development Costs

The Company charges research and development costs to expense as incurred. These costs include all costs associated with research, development and regulatory activities, including submissions to the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).

Patent Costs

Patent costs, including legal expenses, are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Patent expenses are included in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred. Advertising expenses were $0.8 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Advertising expenses were $2.3 million and $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation includes grants of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees, consultants and non-employee directors. The expense associated with these grants is recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity (deficit) based on their fair values as they are earned under the applicable vesting terms. For stock options granted, the fair value of the stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. See Note 13, “Equity-Based Compensation” for further information regarding stock-based compensation expense and the assumptions used in estimating that expense. The Company accounts for RSUs issued to employees and non-employees (board members and consultants) based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of issuance.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Common Stock Warrant Liability

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with its equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with share-based compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Stock Compensation, which encompasses the provisions of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.

The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Additionally, for common stock purchase warrants accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation, the Company classifies as liabilities any contracts where it believes the warrants are deemed to be probable of issuance.

For warrants that are classified as liabilities, the Company records the fair value of the warrants at each balance sheet date and records changes in the estimated fair value as a non-cash gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair values of these warrants are determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the Binomial Lattice (“Lattice”) valuation model, or the Monte Carlo simulation model where deemed appropriate. These values are subject to a significant degree of management’s judgment.

Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share by presenting both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”).

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period, including stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Potentially dilutive common share equivalents are excluded from the diluted EPS computation in net loss periods because their effect would be anti-dilutive.

We have incurred a net loss for all periods presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The following common stock equivalents were not included in the computation of net loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive (in thousands):

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements that could affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity, see Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on March 25, 2021. Since that date and as of the date of this report, there has been no change to management’s expectations about the potential impact of recent accounting pronouncements.

NOTE 3.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company’s cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of investments that are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy include money market securities and certificates of deposit.

The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2021 (in thousands):

The following table presents the Company's assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 (in thousands):

There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2021 or December 31, 2020. 

Depreciation and amortization expense was $13 thousand and $12 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $32 thousand and $40 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

NOTE 8.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Directors and Officers Indemnification

As permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its bylaws, the Company indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that limits its exposure and may enable it to recover a portion of any future payments. The Company believes the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, it has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of September 30, 2021. 

In the normal course of business, the Company provides indemnification of varying scope under its agreements with other companies, typically its clinical research organizations, investigators, clinical sites, suppliers and others. Pursuant to these agreements, it generally indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties in connection with the use or testing of its products or product candidates or with any U.S. patent or any copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by any third party with respect to its products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual. The potential future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. Historically, costs related to these indemnification provisions have been immaterial. The Company also maintains various liability insurance policies that limit its exposure. As a result, it believes the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of September 30, 2021. 

Legal Matters

On July 29, 2019, Mr. John McGovern, the Company’s former Interim President & Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, submitted a demand for arbitration in connection with his separation from service with the Company. The arbitration was settled in December 2020. Mr. McGovern released the Company from all outstanding obligations upon settlement.

The Company’s insurance carrier determined that the Company was entitled to a $0.3 million reimbursement for litigation costs incurred in conjunction with the McGovern matter. The Company received a $0.3 million reimbursement on April 23, 2021 which was offset against general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operation and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

As of September 30, 2021, there were no other matters that, in the opinion of management, would ultimately result in liability that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Leases

The Company leases office space for its corporate headquarters located in Emeryville, California. The initial lease term is through February 28, 2022. The Company has the option to extend the term of the lease for one five (5)-year period upon written notice to the landlord. The Company intends to exercise the renewal option for this lease.

The Company also had a lease commitment for laboratory facilities and office space at EmeryStation North in Emeryville, California (“EmeryStation”) under an operating lease. In July 2016, the Company subleased the EmeryStation space (the “Sublease Agreement”). The Sublease Agreement commenced September 8, 2016. The EmeryStation lease and Sublease Agreement were terminated as of August 31, 2020 pursuant to a sublease termination agreement executed on July 31, 2020.

The components of lease expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 were as follows (in thousands):

The Company has measured its operating lease liabilities at its incremental borrowing rate over the remaining term for each operating lease. The weighted average remaining lease term and the weighted average discount rate are summarized as follows:

Future lease payments under non-cancelable leases as of September 30, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 9.  RELATED PARTY NOTE PAYABLE

On February 27, 2019, the Company issued a $1.0 million promissory note payable to Pioneer Pharma (Hong Kong) Company Ltd. (“Pioneer Pharma”), which was amended on September 25, 2019 and May 14, 2020 (the “Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note provided for an interest payment of $0.2 million which was initially amended to a payment of $0.3 million and subsequently amended to replace the cash interest payment with the delivery of 65,178 units of NeutroPhase (40ml) to Pioneer Pharma. The second amendment to the Promissory Note also provided the Company with the right to repay the note at any time. On May 14, 2020, the Company repaid the $1.0 million principal balance of the Promissory Note using proceeds raised through the at-the-market offering and equity program (“ATM Program”) (see Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”). The Company settled the accrued interest through two separate shipments of NeutroPhase in 2020. Upon full repayment of principal and interest during the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company was released from the Promissory Note with Pioneer Pharma.

In connection with the Promissory Note, the Company paid China Kington a 2% fee for brokering the transaction and entered into a consulting agreement with China Kington for a term of one year, which expired on March 1, 2020 (the “Consulting Agreement”). Bob Wu, acting in a dual role as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and as principal of China Kington, was paid $0.1 million pursuant to the Consulting Agreement. Upon the expiration of the Consulting Agreement, the parties entered into a new consulting agreement, in which no cash compensation will be paid. Debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the Promissory Note of $20 thousand was recognized and recorded as an offset to the related party note payable in the consolidated balance sheets.

The interest expense recognized, including amortization of the issuance costs, was $0 and $75 thousand during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. There was no comparable expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021.

NOTE 10.  CONVERTIBLE NOTE

On March 26, 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (the “Lender”), pursuant to which the Company issued a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”) to the Lender dated as of March 26, 2019. The Convertible Note had an original principal amount of $2.2 million, bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum and matured on September 26, 2020, unless earlier paid, redeemed or converted in accordance with its terms. The Company received net proceeds of $2.0 million after deducting an original issue discount of $0.2 million and debt issuance cost of Lender’s transaction fees of $15 thousand. The Company recognized an additional $0.2 million of debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the Convertible Note. The Convertible Note was repaid in full during the third quarter of 2020. Upon full repayment, the Company was released from the Iliad Securities Purchase Agreement with Lender.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the effective interest rate on the Convertible Note was 22% and 20%, respectively. Interest expense recognized, including amortization of the issuance costs and debt discount, was $16 thousand and $215 thousand during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. There was no comparable expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021.

NOTE 11.  WARRANT LIABILITY  

July 2011 Warrants

The Company issued the July 2011 Warrants (as defined in Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”) in the third quarter of 2011. The terms of the July 2011 Warrants required registered shares to be delivered upon warrant exercise and potential cash-settlement in the event of a specified fundamental transaction. Under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the warrants were classified as liabilities because the Company’s potential obligation to deliver registered shares and cash-settle the warrants were deemed to be beyond the Company’s control. The fair value of outstanding July 2011 Warrants was determined at each reporting date using a Lattice model with changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

On March 6, 2020, the remaining 35,107 July 2011 Warrants expired unexercised. There were no July 2011 Warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2021.

October 2015 Warrants

The Company issued the October 2015 Warrants (as defined in Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”) in the third quarter of 2015. The terms of the October 2015 Warrants required potential cash-settlement in the event of a specified fundamental transaction. Under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the warrants were classified as liabilities because the Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants was deemed to be beyond the Company’s control. The fair value of outstanding October 2015 Warrants was determined at each reporting date using a Lattice model with changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, a total of 22,680 October 2015 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $5 thousand. The liability associated with these warrants was adjusted to fair value of $12 thousand as of the date of exercise, with the change in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value was then transferred to equity.

On October 27, 2020, 15,320 October 2015 expired unexercised. There were no October 2015 Warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2021.

2019 Domestic, Foreign & Ladenburg Warrants

As further described in Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”, the Company issued the 2019 Domestic Warrants, the 2019 Foreign Warrants and the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants in the third quarter of 2019. The terms of the 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants and 2019 Ladenburg Warrants all required potential cash-settlement in the event of a specified fundamental transaction. Under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the warrants were classified as liabilities because the Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants was deemed to be beyond the Company’s control. The fair value of outstanding warrants was determined at each reporting date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Upon issuance in the third quarter of 2019, the fair value of the 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants and 2019 Ladenburg Warrants was determined to be $3.1 million, $2.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

In the third quarter of 2020, as further described in Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”, the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants were exercised at reduced exercise prices. The warrant liabilities associated with these warrants was adjusted to their fair values as of the date of exercise, with the change in fair values recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair values were then transferred to equity. As of the date of exercise, the fair value of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants was determined to be $4.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in accordance with the following key assumptions:

There were no 2019 Domestic Warrants or 2019 Foreign Warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2021.

In the third quarter of 2020, as further described in Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”, the Company amended the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants. The Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants if a specified fundamental transaction occurred was amended to apply only in situations within the Company’s control. Pursuant to this change, the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were no longer classified as liabilities. The warrant liability associated with these warrants was adjusted to fair value as of the date of the amendment, with the change in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value was then transferred to equity. The fair value of the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants was determined to be $0.2 million on the date of amendment in accordance with the following key assumptions:

The 2019 Ladenburg Warrants will no longer be adjusted to fair value in reporting periods after the amendment. All 2019 Ladenburg Warrants remained outstanding as of September 30, 2021.

NOTE 12.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with rights and preferences as may be approved by its Board of Directors under its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. There were no shares of preferred stock outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Common Stock

April 2020 At the Market Offering

In the second quarter of 2020, the Company established the 2020 ATM Program with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”). For additional information regarding the offering and equity program, see the Company’s Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2020 and September 15, 2020. During the second quarter of 2020, 5,836,792 shares of common stock were issued under the 2020 ATM Program for total net proceeds of $5.6 million, net of offering costs of $0.4 million.

May 2021 At the Market Offering

In the second quarter of 2021, the Company established the 2021 ATM Program with Ladenburg. For additional information regarding the offering and equity program, see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 14, 2021. During the second quarter of 2021, 2,672,000 shares of common stock were issued under the 2021 ATM Program for total net proceeds of $1.8 million, net of offering costs of $0.1 million.

Common Stock Warrants

July 2011 Warrants

In the third quarter of 2011, the Company issued 139,520 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 139,520 shares of common stock in connection with a registered direct financing (the “July 2011 Warrants”). The July 2011 Warrants were issued with an exercise price of $33.25 and an expiration date of July 5, 2016. In October 2015, in connection with a separate financing event, the exercise price of outstanding July 2011 Warrants was reduced to $5.00 per share and the expiration date extended to March 6, 2020. In February 2016 and May 2019, the exercise price of outstanding July 2011 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 and $0.2061 per share, respectively, pursuant to price protection provisions of the warrants.

In March 2020, a total of 35,107 July 2011 Warrants expired unexercised. As of September 30, 2021, there were no July 2011 Warrants outstanding.

March 2015 Warrants

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company issued 649,133 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 649,133 shares of common stock in connection with a private placement offering (the “March 2015 Warrants”). The exercise price of individual March 2015 Warrants varied between $15.00 and $16.25 per share at the time of issuance. The Company issued 278,200 of the March 2015 Warrants with an expiration date of March 6, 2020 and the remaining 370,933 March 2015 Warrants with an expiration date of September 6, 2015. In October 2015, in connection with a separate financing event, the exercise price of all outstanding March 2015 Warrants was reduced to $5.00 per share and the expiration date of all outstanding warrants expiring on September 6, 2015 was extended to March 6, 2020. In February 2016 and May 2019, the exercise price of all outstanding July 2011 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 and $0.2061 per share, respectively, pursuant to price protection provisions of the warrants.

During the first quarter of 2020, a total of 70,000 March 2015 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $14 thousand. Also in the first quarter of 2020, all remaining 7,419 March 2015 Warrants expired unexercised. As of September 30, 2021, there were no March 2015 Warrants outstanding.

October 2015 Warrants

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company issued 442,802 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 442,802 shares of common stock in connection with a public offering (the “October 2015 Warrants”). The warrants were issued with an exercise price of $5.00 and an expiration date of October 27, 2020. In February 2016 and May 2019, the exercise price of outstanding October 2015 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 and $0.2061 per share, respectively, pursuant to price protection provisions of the warrants. Also during the fourth quarter of 2020, a total of 22,680 October 2015 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $5 thousand.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, all remaining 15,320 October 2015 Warrants expired unexercised. As of September 30, 2021, there were no October 2015 Warrants outstanding.

June 2019 Private Placement and June 2019 Warrants

During the second quarter of 2019, the Company entered into a private placement agreement to sell 1,371,427 shares of common stock and 1,371,427 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 1,371,427 shares of common stock (the “June 2019 Warrants”) for an aggregate subscription price of $2.4 million. Three accredited investors, Messrs. Xiao Rui Liu, Hai Dong Pang and Ping Huang, subscribed to the private placement for $1.0 million, $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. China Kington served as placement agent in exchange for a commission equal to six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, totaling $0.1 million. The Company also paid other offering costs of $27 thousand.

The June 2019 Warrants were issued with an exercise price of $0.87 and an expiration date of June 17, 2020. The June 2019 Warrants were callable by the Company if the closing price of the Company’s common stock, as reported on the NYSE American, was $1.00 or greater.

During the first quarter of 2020, a total of 228,571 June 2019 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $199 thousand. The Company paid China Kington a fee of $12 thousand, or six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, for brokering the exercise transaction.

During the second quarter of 2020, a total of 571,428 June 2019 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $497 thousand. The Company paid China Kington a fee of $29 thousand, or six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, for brokering the exercise transaction. Also during the second quarter of 2020, all remaining 571,428 June 2019 Warrants expired unexercised. As of September 30, 2021, there were no June 2019 Warrants outstanding.

August 2019 Common Stock Purchase Agreement, 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Ladenburg Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants

In the third quarter of 2019, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “2019 Purchase Agreement”) for the sale of (i) 4,198,566 shares of common stock and (ii) 4,198,566 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 4,198,566 shares of common stock (the “2019 Domestic Warrants”) for gross proceeds of $4.2 million. The 2019 Domestic Warrants were issued with an exercise price of $1.15 and an expiration date of February 13, 2025.

The Company allocated the proceeds between the common stock and 2019 Domestic Warrants by applying the relative fair value allocation methodology. The Company first allocated $3.1 million to the 2019 Domestic Warrants, with the residual amount allocated to the common stock. See Note 11, “Warrant Liability” for further discussion of the key assumptions used to value the 2019 Domestic Warrants.

Ladenburg served as the placement agent for the transaction in exchange for a commission representing six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, totaling $0.3 million, and 167,942 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 167,942 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.25 per share and an expiration date of August 8, 2024 (the “2019 Ladenburg Warrants”). In addition, the Company reimbursed the Placement Agent $60 thousand for certain expenses. The Company also incurred and paid other offering costs of $0.3 million.

The Company incurred total issuance costs of $0.5 million in conjunction with the 2019 Purchase Agreement. The Company allocated $0.2 million of the issuance costs to the warrant liability which was expensed in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the period. The remaining $0.3 million was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were accounted for as a stock issuance cost, $59 thousand was allocated to the warrant liability and expensed during the period and $65 thousand was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. See Note 11, “Warrant Liability” for a discussion of the key assumptions used to value the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants.

During the third quarter of 2020, the Company and the holders of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and the 2019 Foreign Warrants entered into exercise agreements which resulted in the cash exercise of the warrants at a reduced exercise price of $0.99. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $6.8 million from the exercises. The Company incurred and paid other offering costs of $0.2 million. The Company also incurred and paid a $0.2 million fee to China Kington for brokering the transaction, which equaled six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds from the 2019 Foreign Warrants.

During the third quarter of 2020, the Company and all holders of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants entered into warrant repricing letter agreements. Pursuant to the agreement, in consideration for the exercise in full of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants, the Company agreed to: (1) reduce the exercise price of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and the 2019 Foreign Warrants to $0.99 per share prior to exercise, and (2) in a private placement, issue new common stock purchase warrants (the “New Warrants”) to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock, equal to 100% of the number of 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants currently held by such holders upon the holders exercising their warrants.

The New Warrants became exercisable nine months after their issuance, for an aggregate of 6,898,566 shares of common stock. The New Warrants have an exercise price of $1.65 per share and will expire five and a half years after their issuance. The Company determined that the common stock issued from the exercise of the 2019 Domestic and 2019 Foreign Warrants, and the New Warrants to be one unit of account, and therefore did not allocate the proceeds between the common stock and the New Warrants as, the proceeds, even if allocated, would be both recognized in additional paid-in capital.

During the third quarter of 2020, the Company also entered into a reprice agreement with Ladenburg which reduced the exercise price to $0.99 per share and amended certain terms of the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants. The Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants if a specified fundamental transaction occurred was amended to apply only in situations within the Company’s control. As further described in Note 11, “Warrant Liability”, the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were no longer classified as a liability as a result of this amendment.

TLF Bio Innovation 2021 Warrants

On January 15, 2021, TLF Bio Innovation was granted warrants exercisable for 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.6718 (the “TLF Warrants”). The TLF Warrants will expire five years after their issuance. The TLF Warrants are classified as equity.

The details of all outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2021 were as follows:

NOTE 13.  EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

Equity Compensation Plans 

In  October 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) to provide for the granting of equity awards, such as stock options, unrestricted and restricted common stock, stock units, dividend equivalent rights, and stock appreciation rights to employees, directors and outside consultants, as determined by the Board. The 2007 Plan expired on  March 15, 2017. Upon expiration, new awards cannot be issued pursuant to the 2007 Plan, but outstanding awards continue to be governed by its terms. Stock options granted under the 2007 Plan expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. All stock options outstanding under the 2007 Plan were fully vested as of  December 31, 2020.

In  March 2017, the Company adopted the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”), which was approved by stockholders on  June 2, 2017, to provide for the granting of equity awards, such as nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”), incentive stock options (“ISOs”), restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), RSUs and other share-based awards to employees, directors, and consultants, as determined by the Board. The 2017 Plan does not affect awards previously granted under the 2007 Plan. Upon adoption, the 2017 Plan allowed for awards of up to 2,318,486 shares of the Company’s common stock, plus an automatic annual increase in the number of shares authorized for awards on the first day of each of the Company’s fiscal years beginning  January 1, 2018 through  January 1, 2027 equal to (i) 4% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (ii) such lesser number of shares of common stock than provided for in Section 4(a)(i) of the 2017 Plan as determined by the Board. On  January 15, 2021, the number of shares available for future awards under the 2017 Plan was increased by 1,671,303 shares. As of  September 30, 2021, there were 2,325,118 shares available for future awards under the 2017 Plan.

Under the terms of the 2017 Plan, the exercise price of NQSOs, ISOs and SARs  may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and, if ISOs are granted to an owner of more than 10% of the Company’s stock, then not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The term of awards will not be longer than ten years, or in the case of ISOs, not longer than five years with respect to holders of more than 10% of the Company’s stock. Stock options granted to employees generally vest over four years, while options granted to directors and consultants typically vest over a shorter period, subject to continued service. The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises under the 2007 Plan and the 2017 Plan.

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock option awards and the closing market price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the NYSE American as of  September 30, 2021 for options that have a quoted market price in excess of the exercise price. There were no stock option awards exercised during the three and nine months ended  September 30, 2021. The Company received no cash payments for the exercise of stock options during the three and nine months ended  September 30, 2021. There were 20 thousand stock option awards exercised during the three and nine months ended  September 30, 2020, for which the Company received cash payments of $6 thousand.

As of  September 30, 2021, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and restricted stock units was approximately $1.2 million. This amount is expected to be recognized as stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 2.45 years.

Stock Option Awards to Employees and Directors

The Company grants options to purchase common stock to its employees and directors at prices equal to or greater than the market value of the stock on the dates the options are granted. The Company has estimated the value of stock option awards as of the date of grant by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the single-option valuation approach. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and subjective in nature. See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Account Policies,” for a description of the accounting policies that the Company applied to value its stock-based awards. 

During the nine months ended  September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company granted options to employees and directors to purchase an aggregate of 291,000 and 1,156,000 shares of common stock, respectively.

The weighted-average assumptions used in determining the value of options are as follows: 

Expected Price Volatility—This is a measure of the amount by which the stock price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The computation of expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of our own stock.

Expected Term—This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding. The expected life assumption is based on the Company’s historical data.

Risk-Free Interest Rate—This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the week of the grant having a term approximating the expected life of the option.

Dividend Yield—We have not made any dividend payments nor do we have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and reduce compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.

In addition, during the nine months ended  September 30, 2021, the Company granted 1,228,359 shares of restricted stock to employees and directors. During the nine months ended  September 30, 2020, the Company granted 160,000 shares of restricted stock to employees and directors.

For the three months ended  September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $151 thousand and $159 thousand, respectively, for stock-based awards to employees and directors.  For the nine months ended  September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $523 thousand and $332 thousand, respectively, for stock-based awards to employees and directors.     

In  April 2020, the Company modified stock options held by Ms. Gail Maderis, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective  April 1, 2020. The option exercise period for Ms. Maderis was extended from three months to three years, calculated from her date of resignation. Also, her stock option awards became fully vested at the date of her resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized incremental stock-based compensation expense of $36 thousand, which is included in the figure above.

In August 2020, the Company modified stock options held by Mr. Xiaopei Wang, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective August 21, 2020. The option exercise period for Mr. Wang was extended from three months to three years, calculated from his date of resignation. Also, his stock option awards became fully vested at the date of his resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $17 thousand, which is included in the figure above.

Stock-Based Awards to Non-Employees

During the nine months ended  September 30, 2021, the Company did not grant options exercisable for shares of common stock to non-employees in exchange for advisory and consulting services. During the nine months ended  September 30, 2020, the Company granted 100,000 options exercisable for shares of common stock to non-employees in exchange for advisory and consulting services.

The stock options are recorded at their fair value on the grant date and recognized over the respective service or vesting period. The fair value of the stock options that are granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model based upon the following assumptions:

For the three months ended  September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $73 thousand and $17 thousand, respectively, related to non-employee consultant stock and option grants. For the nine months ended  September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $180 thousand and $27 thousand, respectively, related to non-employee consultant stock and option grants.  

In connection with Mr. Mark Sieczkarek’s resignation in 2019, the Company also entered into a two-year consulting agreement with Mr. Sieczkarek (the “Consulting Agreement), pursuant to which Mr. Sieczkarek provided consulting service to the Company in exchange for restricted stock units from the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan with an aggregate fair market value equal to $440 thousand as of the date of grant. The restricted stock units were issued in two equal tranches on July 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021, respectively, with the share amount calculated using the closing price on each respective grant date. The shares were fully vested as of the date of grant. The expense related to this separation agreement was recorded over the term of the Consulting Agreement. In July 2020, the Company issued Mr. Sieczkarek 192,983 fully vested shares of registered stock pursuant to the Consulting Agreement. In July 2021, the Company issued Mr. Sieczkarek 328,359 fully vested shares of registered stock pursuant to the Consulting Agreement.

NOTE 14.  LICENSE, COLLABORATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS

Transactions under the Company’s major distribution agreements are recognized upon transfer of control of product sold to its major distribution partners at the amount of consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to. The Company records contract liabilities for the amounts that are estimated to be subject to significant reversal, including allowances for services, discounts, rebate programs, and product returns.

The following table presents changes in the Company's contract assets and liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 (in thousands): 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized the following revenue (in thousands):

Avenova Distribution Agreements and Specialty Pharmacies

Prescription Avenova is made available in local pharmacies and major pharmacy retail chains under nationwide distribution agreements with McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen. We have also entered into direct agreements with preferred pharmacy networks as part of our Partner Pharmacy Program. During the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company earned $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in sales revenue for its Avenova product from these distribution and partner pharmacy agreements. During the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company earned $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in sales revenue for its Avenova product from these distribution and partner pharmacy agreements.

Under the prescription Avenova product distribution arrangements, the Company had a contract liability balance of $0.6 million and $0.7 million at  September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The contract liability is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company also recorded a prepayment of $40 thousand and $0.1 million for rebates related to these distribution agreements as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, that is recorded in the prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 4, “Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets”. 

Over-the-counter Avenova

Non-prescription Avenova was launched online on September 1, 2019 direct to U.S. customers. Over-the-counter Avenova is offered primarily for sale on Amazon.com, the Company’s website (Avenova.com) and Walmart.com as well as in CVS stores. Over-the-counter Avenova is the same strength hypochlorous formulation as our prescription Avenova product, but comes in a smaller size. This channel provides the Company with more stable pricing and provides customers with easy access to our product. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, the revenue generated from over-the-counter Avenova was $1.2 million and $3.8 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the revenue generated from over-the-counter Avenova was $1.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

NOTE 15.  EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company has a 401(k) plan covering all eligible employees. The Company was not required to contribute to the plan and made no contributions during either the three or nine months ended September 30, 2021 or 2020. Due to a change in the terms of the 401(k) plan, beginning on January 1, 2022, the Company will be required to make a matching contribution equal to 100% of deferrals up to 3% of eligible pay plus 50% of deferrals between 3% and 5% of eligible pay.

NOTE 16.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS      

Related Party Revenue 

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s related party revenue and cost of goods sold during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands):

Related party accounts receivable was $0.1 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

Other Related Party Expenses 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company purchased KN95 Masks through an affiliate of China Pioneer. As of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, related party accounts payable was $0 and $8 thousand, respectively.

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s other related party expenses excluding stock-based compensation during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands):

In connection with the Company's re-launch of CelleRx Clinical Reset, on November 17, 2020, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Eric Wu (the “Consulting Agreement”). Eric Wu is Partner and Senior Vice President of China Kington and the brother of Bob Wu, who serves on the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Eric Wu will act as a consultant to the Company in support of the CelleRx product re-launch as well as in potential financings and other transaction opportunities. The term of the Consulting Agreement is for twelve months. As consideration for his services, the Company granted Eric Wu options exercisable for 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan with an exercise price equal to the Company’s closing stock price on the date of the grant and vesting on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. There was no stock-based compensation expense recorded for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2020 related to Eric Wu’s options. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, a fee of $31 thousand and $91 thousand, respectively, was recorded.

NOTE 17.  PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM

On May 6, 2020, the Company received loan proceeds in the amount of $0.9 million from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “PPP Loan”) pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), which was enacted on March 27, 2020.The terms of the PPP Loan were subsequently revised in accordance with the provisions of the Paycheck Protection Flexibility Act of 2020, or the PPP Flexibility Act, which was enacted on September 5, 2020. The PPP loan provided for an interest rate of 1.00% per year and maturity two years after the date of initial disbursement, with initial principal and interest payments coming due late in fiscal 2021. The Note could be prepaid by the Company at any time prior to the maturity with no prepayment penalties. Funds from the PPP Loan could only be used for payroll costs, costs used to continue group health care benefits, rent and utilities incurred during the 24-week period after receiving the PPP Loan (collectively, “Qualifying Expenses”) in order for the PPP Loan to be forgiven in whole or in part. The Company used the entire PPP Loan amount for Qualifying Expenses.

Since the Company determined that there was reasonable assurance that it would meet the conditions for forgiveness of the full loan amount, the Company accounted for the forgivable PPP Loan as a government income grant that we earned through the Company’s compliance with the loan forgiveness criteria. A deferred income liability was recognized upon receipt of the forgivable loan proceeds. The deferred income liability was recognized as other income as Qualifying Expenses were incurred. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, $432 thousand and $901 thousand, respectively, was recognized as other income and recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. No amount was recognized for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2021.

The Company received notice, dated May 24, 2021, from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. confirming the full loan amount of $0.9 million was forgiven.

NOTE 18.  DERMADOCTOR LLC TRANSACTION

On September 27, 2021, the Company entered into a Membership Unit Purchase Agreement by and among (i) the Company, (ii) DERMAdoctor, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company (“DERMAdoctor”), (iii) Jeff Kunin and Audrey Kunin, individuals residing in the State of Kansas; (iv) Papillon Partners, Inc., a Missouri corporation that is owned by the Founders; and (v) Midwest Growth Partners, L.L.L.P., an Iowa limited liability limited partnership. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company will acquire 100% of the membership units of DERMAdoctor (the “Transaction”). DERMAdoctor is an omni-channel skincare company that was formed in 1998 and is primarily focused on the creation of products that are designed to target common skin concerns, ranging from aging and blemishes to dry skin, perspiration and keratosis pilaris. DERMAdoctor currently sells over 30 products under lines that include Ain’t Misbehavin’, Calm Cool + Corrected, Kakadu C, KP Duty, and Wrinkle Revenge and sells its products through major retailers such as Macy’s, QVC, Costco, digital beauty retailers such as SkinStore and Amazon, and its own website.

The Closing was subject to certain conditions, including the Company completing a financing to raise capital sufficient to fund the purchase price for the Transaction, which the Company completed in the fourth quarter of 2021 as described further in Note 19, “Subsequent Events”.