UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ____________ to _____________.
001-07395
Commission File Number
AV HOMES, INC.
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Delaware
|
|
23-1739078
|
|
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
8601 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 225, Scottsdale, Arizona
|
|
85253
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code
)
|
(480) 214-7400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market
|
|
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
o
No
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Larger Accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
x
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
o
No
x
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $272,056,141 as of June 30, 2013.
As of February 26, 2014, there were 21,993,570 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The following business description should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “us,” “our,” “AV Homes,” or the “Company” refer to AV Homes, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Dollar amounts specified herein are in thousands, except per share amounts or as otherwise indicated.
Company Overview
AV Homes, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1970. In 2012, we changed our name from Avatar Holdings Inc. to AV Homes, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 8601 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 225, Scottsdale, Arizona 85253, and our telephone number is (480) 214-7400. Our website address is www.avhomesinc.com. Information on our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
AV Homes, Inc. is a homebuilder engaged in the business of homebuilding, community development, and land sales in Florida and Arizona, and has recently expanded into North Carolina. Our business focuses on the development of (i) active adult communities, which are age-restricted or age-targeted to the age 55 and over active adult demographic, and (ii) primary residential communities, which serve first-time and move-up buyers, and the construction and sale of residences within these communities. Additionally, we have a portfolio of legacy land holdings that we sell in favorable market conditions. As of December 31, 2013, we owned 2,964 developed residential lots, 3,193 partially developed residential lots, 13,714 undeveloped residential lots, and 7,860 acres of mixed use, commercial, and industrial land. We utilize our deep experience, strong operating platform, and land inventory to capitalize on the strengthening housing environment and favorable demographic trends within our core markets. We are publicly held and our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “AVHI.”
Our performance in our core business segments of active adult community development and primary residential community development has improved for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to prior years. As the market continues to recover from the industry downturn, we have experienced the positive impact from that as well. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we closed on 481 homes at an average sales price of $238 per closed home, generating $114 million of home sale revenue, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, in which we closed on 306 homes at an average sales price of $227 per closed home, generating $69 million of home sale revenue. The number of housing contracts (net of cancellations) signed in 2013 increased 18% compared to 2012, and at December 31, 2013, we had 167 homes in backlog with a sales value of approximately $39.9 million compared to 185 homes in backlog with a sales value of approximately $43.1 million at December 31, 2012.
Our Strengths
We believe we are well-positioned to execute our core business strategies as a result of the following competitive strengths:
Transformed from a land company to an efficient, process-driven homebuilder.
Beginning in 2011, we implemented a strategic planning initiative to restructure our overhead costs and reposition the Company as a cost-efficient and process-driven homebuilder. Pursuant to this initiative, we re-aligned our business to capitalize on the demographic trends and homebuilding recovery in our core markets of Florida and Arizona. Specifically, our management re-evaluated all of our land holdings to identify core assets for development and homebuilding activities, as well as non-core assets to be sold in favorable market conditions. We also recruited a new team of senior and operating management with longstanding experience in the homebuilding industry, strengthening us to take advantage of the ongoing housing recovery.
Significant expertise in our core markets.
We have been engaged in the business of homebuilding, community development, and land sales since 1970, and we have significant geographic expertise in the Florida and Arizona markets. In addition, as a result of our experience in developing communities for the active adult population for over three decades, we have market expertise in serving the housing and lifestyle aspirations of the vast Baby Boomer population. Our management team has a deep understanding of the active adult and primary residential market segments and the preferences of the buyers in these segments. We also supplement our expertise in our segments by utilizing a research-based approach to understanding the lifestyle preferences of these buyer segments.
3
Favorable demographics and real estate market recovery.
In the active adult segment, we believe the demographic trends and lifestyle aspirations of aging Baby Boomers provide us with a favorable environment for future business. Although we have begun to see improvement in primary residential housing statistics, the active adult segment has been slower to recover. We are seeing signs of recovery in the active adult market as the broader U.S. housing market rebounds.
Reputation for unique high-quality homes in desirable locations.
We believe that our reputation for delivering high-quality homes in desirable locations, coupled with our unique amenities and home designs emphasizing lifestyle and value, drive customers to our developments. We seek to provide the highest level of customer service to our homebuyers by involving them in multiple phases of the construction process. Homebuyer involvement allows our sales staff to enhance their knowledge and relationship with our buyers. Our selling process focuses on the homes’ features, benefits, quality, and design, as opposed to merely price and square footage. In order to ensure that our buyers are able to make informed decisions, we generally utilize customer-friendly design centers focused on meeting our customers’ range of needs as they move through the process of purchasing a home.
Business Strategy
Our primary business is homebuilding, which includes the acquisition, development and building of active adult and conventional home communities, in Florida, Arizona and North Carolina. Our core business strategies, which we believe give us long-term competitive advantages relative to other builders, are intended to promote our growth, drive profitability and generate cash liquidity, and are summarized below.
Serve the lifestyle and housing needs of the 55+ active adults.
Millions of Baby Boomers will continue to age toward and reach retirement. This demographic supports a growing interest in lifestyle-oriented, age-qualified communities, especially throughout the Sun Belt. We serve the lifestyle and housing needs of these active adults with innovative communities uniquely tailored to their lifestyle ambitions through our existing Solivita and Vitalia communities in Florida, and our existing CantaMia and future Encore communities in Arizona. In North Carolina, we are planning the opening of our Creekside community at Bethpage.
Strategically expand our primary business segments to capitalize on market recoveries.
We focus on strategic development of land and communities to ensure sales of homes in high buyer-demand environments, which will allow us to obtain higher home prices and gross margins. We employ a deliberate land acquisition strategy focused on making prudent investments in high-demand markets in addition to exploring opportunities to broaden our geographic footprint. We also intend to maximize near-term value through developing communities where appropriate on our existing buildable land positions.
Active Adult
. We currently operate our active adult business segment in select Florida and Arizona markets. We have recently expanded into the North Carolina market which we believe will generate attractive investment returns. We are committed to buying land that we believe can be developed profitably in the near term.
Primary Residential
. We are focused on deploying capital to the improving primary residential sector. In markets that we believe will generate high return profiles and strong margins, we are actively buying land and developing primary residential communities for first-time and move-up buyers.
Maintain core focus on operational improvements to drive profitability while managing construction and labor costs.
We intend to utilize proven technologies and processes to drive profitability. In 2012, we upgraded our information technology, enabling us to manage our business more effectively. In addition to the new systems, we introduced strategies and procedures designed to streamline our homebuilding operations. With keen insight into our customers’ buying habits, we are simplifying processes and employing value-engineering practices to help us deliver high-quality, well-built homes with the value our customers expect and the margins that enhance our profitability.
Exercise prudent balance sheet management to maintain ample liquidity for growth.
We believe that it is critical for us to maintain a strong balance sheet with ample liquidity so that we can service our debt obligations, support on-going homebuilding operations, and take advantage of growth opportunities in our core markets as the housing market recovers. As of December 31, 2013, we had $145 million of cash and cash equivalents and $105 million of outstanding debt, mostly due in 2016.
Profitably monetize non-core commercial and industrial assets and scattered lots.
We continue to execute a portfolio rationalization plan whereby we opportunistically sell non-core commercial and industrial assets, as well as scattered lot positions and land assets that are in excess of our needed supply in a given market. We sold $16.3 million under this plan in 2013 for a profit of $8.2 million and $26.6 million in 2012 for a profit of $8 million.
Our Operations
4
Our primary business is homebuilding, which includes the acquisition, development and building of active adult and conventional home communities in Florida, Arizona, and North Carolina. For further information regarding our financial condition and results of operations, please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Active Adult Community Development
A primary component of our business is the development of active adult communities and the construction and sales of residences within those communities. We intend to grow the business and continue to seek and evaluate opportunities to expand our active adult operations both in terms of assets and geography. Our current major active adult communities include:
Solivita
Solivita comprises approximately 10,387 lots on 4,193 acres in Central Florida, south of the Orlando metropolitan area. Solivita offers its residents numerous activities through the community’s Lifestyles program and approximately 148,000 square feet of recreation facilities. These facilities include two fitness centers, 14 heated swimming pools, restaurants, arts and crafts rooms, a café, and other meeting and ballroom facilities. We also developed and own two 18-hole championship golf courses. The community’s activity park houses a variety of sports and games facilities, including an official softball field, shuffleboard courts, pickle ball courts and tennis courts. Social activities at Solivita include its 170 clubs, including such diverse interests as photography, softball, theatre and motorcycle riding.
Solivita commenced active sales in 2000. From inception, we have closed 3,741 of the 5,887 planned residences and approximately 6,200 individuals reside in the community as of December 31, 2013.
CantaMia
CantaMia is a 1,760 lot active adult community located on 541 acres in the Estrella Mountain Ranch master planned community in Goodyear, Arizona, west of Phoenix. Residents have exclusive use of the 30,000 square foot recreation and lifestyle facility that has, as its focal point, a ten acre man-made lake system. Amenities include an exercise facility, indoor/outdoor swimming pools, a demonstration kitchen, a library, a technology center, rooms for arts/crafts and games, a movement studio for yoga and aerobics, and a café. CantaMia also has space for outdoor sporting venues, including swimming, softball, pickle ball, bocce ball, tennis and horseshoes.
We purchased phase one of the partially developed community in September 2010, phase two in December 2011, and phase three in December 2013. We have been selling in the previously developed sections of phase one of CantaMia and have now begun development on the remaining sections of phase one. Sales officially began in February 2010, and the grand opening of the recreation facility occurred in March 2011. A total of 186 units have closed as of December 31, 2013.
Vitalia at Tradition
Vitalia at Tradition (“Tradition”) is a 1,144 lot active adult community, comprised of 212 developed lots, 351 partially developed lots and approximately 438 undeveloped master planned lots in a 452-acre active adult community located in St. Lucie County, Florida, located between Vero Beach and West Palm Beach on Florida's east coast. We acquired this property in 2009 in its partially developed condition. We have now completed new model homes and have commenced initial development of additional roadways and the recreation center amenity. Development commenced in 2005 and a total of 143 homes have closed since 2009 as of December 31, 2013.
Encore at Eastmark
Encore at Eastmark ("Encore") will be our latest active adult community to be developed in the Southeast Valley of Metropolitan Phoenix, in the City of Mesa, Arizona. Encore is a 310-acre master planned community, located within the much larger master-planned community of Eastmark, currently under development by renowned developer DMB, Inc. Encore will offer four different product lines designed for the active adult demographic, encompassing 905 lots.
The sales office and model complex are planned to open in early 2015, with housing starts following shortly thereafter. The amenity complex is currently under design and planned to open in 2016. Amenities will include up to 15,000 square feet of air conditioned space offering exercise, yoga, locker rooms, swim, spa, tennis, pickle ball, and multi-use rooms.
5
Creekside at Bethpage
Creekside is our first entry into the Raleigh/Durham market. This community is part of the larger Bethpage mixed-use development, which consists of residential, retail, multifamily and commercial uses. Creekside is a 292-acre parcel with a preliminary total of 650 lots that will be age-restricted and target the active adult segment. Creekside will have four different product lines ranging from 1,200 to 2,600 square feet.
The sales center and model complex are in the planning process with an estimated opening of spring/summer of 2015. The amenities are also under design and will consist of a 15,000 square foot clubhouse with tennis courts, pickle ball courts, bocce, urban garden, and swimming pool. The amenities are estimated to open in the spring of 2016.
Primary Residential Community Development
The primary residential market continues to improve since the housing downturn and we believe continued investment in this segment will provide us with a balanced portfolio. We acquired over 800 lots in five new communities in the second half of 2013 and expect to begin selling and building these along with the ongoing construction in our existing communities in the Phoenix, Arizona market. Additionally, we are building out our existing communities in Central Florida, and are expanding into a new market in North Carolina.
Information relating to our backlog is discussed in Item 7 of Part II of this report under the heading "Results of Operations."
The following is a breakdown of our land holdings as of December 31,
2013
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Lots
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Total Lots (1)
|
|
Closed Lots (2)
|
|
Developed
|
Partially Developed
|
Raw
|
|
Total Remaining Lots
|
|
Total Acres (3)
|
|||||||
|
Principal Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Active Adult Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Solivita
|
10,387
|
|
|
3,741
|
|
|
673
|
|
564
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
6,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitalia at Tradition
|
1,144
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
212
|
|
351
|
|
438
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,531
|
|
|
3,884
|
|
|
885
|
|
915
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
7,647
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
CantaMia
|
1,760
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
240
|
|
196
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastmark
|
905
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
905
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
240
|
|
196
|
|
2,043
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Bethpage
|
658
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
658
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Active Adult Communities
|
14,854
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
1,111
|
|
8,548
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Primary Residential Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Florida
|
3,847
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
424
|
|
1,152
|
|
772
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona
|
1,132
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
445
|
|
212
|
|
345
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
228
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
228
|
|
—
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Primary Residential Communities
|
5,207
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
869
|
|
1,592
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Principal Communities
|
20,061
|
|
|
5,699
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
2,703
|
|
9,665
|
|
|
14,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Commercial & Industrial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Not Actively Building or Developing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Platted Scattered Lots
|
4,812
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
818
|
|
490
|
|
31
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unplatted Scattered Mixed-Use Raw Land
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Not Actively Building or Developing
|
4,812
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
818
|
|
490
|
|
31
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
6,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Land Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Platted Residential
|
4,036
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
152
|
|
—
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Family Communities
|
218
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
218
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unplatted Residential, Commerical or Industrial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
Total Land Held for Sale
|
4,254
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
152
|
|
—
|
|
4,018
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Grand Total
|
29,127
|
|
|
9,256
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
3,193
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
19,871
|
|
|
7,860
|
|
(1) Estimated planned lots/units are based on historical densities for our land. New projects may ultimately be developed into more or less than the number of lots/units stated.
(2) Closed lots are only shown for communities where we are actively building.
(3) Acres are reflected as gross acres and are not intended to represent net developable acres.
Acquisition of Royal Oak Homes
On March 13, 2014, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain of the liabilities of Royal Oak Homes, LLC (“Royal Oak”) and certain land positions from an affiliate of Royal Oak. We also entered into an agreement to acquire additional lots in the future, and we received a right of first refusal with respect to single family residential land acquisitions and projects sold by an affiliate of Royal Oak for two years after the closing. The total purchase price paid under the acquisition agreements was approximately $65 million, paid in cash, which includes a $3 million earn-out. The actual amount of the earn-out may be more or less than the $3 million target amount based on the performance of the Royal Oak business through the end of 2015.
The acquisition complements our well-established, existing presence in the Poinciana market. With over 2,500 primary residential lots owned or controlled, Royal Oak enhances our position in a key growth market. The purchase of Royal Oak gives us a more balanced company with broader customer segmentation focus and advances our growth strategy in the near-term in the Central Florida marketplace.
Business Segment Information
Our business segment information regarding revenues, results of operations and assets is incorporated herein by reference to Note 13 "Business Segments" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.
Trademarks
7
We have federally registered trademarks and service marks or pending applications for federal registration for several of our entities, operations and communities, including AV Homes™, Joseph Carl Homes™, Stonegate®, Solivita™, and CantaMia™.
Employees
At December 31,
2013
, we employed 133 individuals on a full-time or part-time basis. Relations with our employees are satisfactory and there have been no work stoppages.
Available Information
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy materials that we have filed with the SEC at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
You can access financial and other information on our website, at
www.avhomesinc.com
. The information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge, copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing such material electronically or otherwise with the SEC.
Regulation
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations that affect every aspect of our business, such as environmental, hazardous waste and land use requirements, and can result in substantial expense to AV Homes.
Homes and residential communities that we build must comply with federal, state and local laws, regulations, and ordinances relating to, among other things, zoning, construction permits or entitlements, construction material requirements, density requirements, and requirements relating to building design and property elevation, building codes and the handling of waste. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent change and often result in increased construction or other costs related to our business. In some instances, we must comply with laws that require commitments from us to provide roads and other offsite infrastructure to be in place prior to the commencement of new construction. These laws and regulations may result in fees and assessments, including, without limitation, fees and assessments for schools, parks, streets and highways and other public improvements, the costs of which can be substantial.
The residential homebuilding industry is also subject to a variety of federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of human health and the environment. These environmental laws include such areas as storm water and surface water management, soil, groundwater, endangered or imperiled species, natural resources and wetlands protection, and air quality protection and enhancement. Complying with environmental laws for existing conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and may prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in environmentally-sensitive regions or areas.
Competition
The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. Homebuilders compete not only for home buyers, but also for desirable properties, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. We compete with other local, regional and national homebuilders, often within larger subdivisions, that are designed, planned and developed by such homebuilders. We also compete with home sales by others, foreclosures and rental properties. In addition, the consolidation of some homebuilding companies may create additional competitors that have greater financial, marketing and sales resources than we do and thus are able to compete more effectively against us, and there may be new entrants in the markets in which we currently conduct business. These competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry can affect our business and financial results through lower sales, lower selling prices, increased selling incentives, lower profit margins, impairments in the value of inventory and other assets, difficulty in acquiring suitable land, raw materials, and skilled labor at acceptable prices or terms, and delays in construction of our homes.
8
Seasonality
Our business is affected to some extent by the seasonality of home sales which generally produce higher levels of sales contracts during the months of November through April for active adult communities in the geographic areas in which we conduct our business. This pattern typically produces increased closings in the latter half of the year.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table includes information with respect to all persons serving as executive officers of AV Homes as of the date of this Form 10-K. Officers of AV Homes have been elected to serve until the next annual election of officers (which is expected to occur on June 10, 2014), when they are re-appointed or their successors are elected or until their earlier resignation or removal.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Office and Business Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger A. Cregg
|
57
|
Mr. Cregg has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer, and member of our Board of Directors since December 2012. Prior to this, Mr. Cregg served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, a residential and commercial service company, from August 2011 through November 2012. He served as Executive Vice President of PulteGroup, Inc. (formerly known as Pulte Homes, Inc.), a national homebuilding company, from May 2003 to May 2011 and Chief Financial Officer of PulteGroup, Inc. from January 1998 to May 2011. He served as Senior Vice President of PulteGroup, Inc. from January 1998 to May 2003. He has served as a director of Comerica Incorporated since 2006. He was a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Detroit Branch, from January 2004 to December 2009 and served as Chair from January to December 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Burnett
|
46
|
Mr. Burnett has served as AV Homes’ Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2013. Prior to this, Mr. Burnett served as Group Vice President, Finance, Treasury and Investor Relations for JDA Software Group, Inc., a leading global software provider offering supply chain management solutions, from November 2009 to October 2013. Previously, he served as Chief Financial Officer for American Traffic Solutions, Inc., a leading provider of technology and business solutions for traffic safety and electronic toll collection programs worldwide. He also served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer, and held various financial roles for Allied Waste Industries, Inc. from 1998 to 2008. Mr. Burnett began his career as a certified public accountant with Arthur Andersen LLP, from 1990 to 1998 providing audit and business advisory services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph C. Mulac III
|
52
|
Mr. Mulac has served as our Executive Vice President and President of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc., since October 2010. Since April 2009, Mr. Mulac has served as Chief Executive Officer of Joseph Carl Homes, LLC (n/k/a Avatar Properties of Arizona, LLC). From March 2003 to April 2009, Mr. Mulac held the position of Division President and then Group President for the Engle Homes division of Technical Olympic USA. He served as Division President for Standard Pacific from 1998 to March 2003. Mr. Mulac held various manager positions with UDC Homes from 1988 to 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave M. Gomez
|
49
|
Mr. Gomez has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since October 2012. From 2010 to 2012 he served as the Senior Vice President and General Counsel for StarTek, Inc., a business process outsourcing provider, and from 2008 until 2009 as Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officer with eTelecare Global Solutions, a Philippine-based BPO provider with over 13,000 agents worldwide. From 2005 until 2008, Mr. Gomez served as General Counsel for ProLink Holdings Corp. and from 2004 to 2005 as Senior Attorney at EaglePicher Incorporated. From 1996 to 2003, he was an associate with the law firm of Quarles & Brady, Streich Lang, LLP in Phoenix, Arizona. Prior to his legal career, Mr. Gomez was a Senior Design Engineer with Loral-Vought Systems and Rockwell International Space Systems Division. Mr. Gomez holds a Bachelor’s degree in Aeronautical Engineering Technology from Arizona State University, an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University and a Juris Doctorate from The University of Texas School of Law.
|
No executive officer of AV Homes has any family relationship with any other executive officer or director of AV Homes.
9
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (Dollars in thousands)
Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock, may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend for our forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements in this document speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Although we believe that the expectations, plans, intentions and projections reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
The risks, uncertainties and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include the following.
The homebuilding industry, which is cyclical and affected by a variety of factors, recently underwent a significant downturn. Although the industry has begun to recover, including our primary markets of Florida and Arizona, homebuilding remains below historic levels and the duration and ultimate speed of recovery remain uncertain. Deterioration in industry conditions or in broader economic conditions could have additional material adverse effects on our business and financial results.
The homebuilding industry is highly cyclical and is significantly affected by changes in industry conditions, as well as in global and local economic conditions, such as changes in:
|
•
|
employment and income levels;
|
|
•
|
availability of financing for homebuyers;
|
|
•
|
interest rates;
|
|
•
|
consumer confidence;
|
|
•
|
levels of new and existing homes for sale or rent;
|
|
•
|
demographic trends; and
|
|
•
|
housing demand.
|
Changes in these conditions may occur on a national scale, as is the case in the recent downturn and ongoing recovery, or may acutely affect some of the regions or markets in which we operate more than others. When adverse conditions affect markets, they could have a proportionately greater impact on us than on other homebuilding companies with smaller presences in these locally affected markets. Our current operations are concentrated primarily in the markets of Florida and Arizona, which were more adversely affected by the recent downturn and as a result the downturn had a more substantial impact on our business and financial results than some of our competitors.
The recent downturn in the homebuilding industry was one of the most severe housing downturns in U.S. history. The significant decline in the demand for new homes, the significant oversupply of homes in some markets and the significant reductions in the availability of financing for homebuyers that marked the downturn are continuing and may continue for some time. We experienced material reductions in our home sales and homebuilding revenues, and we have incurred and may incur in the future material inventory impairments and losses from our joint venture interests and other write-offs. Although market conditions have improved, it is not clear when we may return to profitability. The reversal of the recent recovery or slower than anticipated improvements in our primary markets would have a further material adverse effect on our business, liquidity and results of operations.
Homebuilding is very competitive, and competitive conditions could adversely affect our business or financial results.
The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. Homebuilders compete not only for home buyers, but also for desirable properties, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. We compete with other local, regional and national homebuilders, often within larger subdivisions that are designed, planned and developed by such homebuilders. We also
10
compete with home sales by others, foreclosures and rental properties. In addition, the consolidation of some homebuilding companies may create additional competitors that have greater financial, marketing and sales resources than we do and thus are able to compete more effectively against us, and there may be new entrants in the markets in which we currently conduct business. These competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry can affect our business and financial results through:
|
•
|
lower sales;
|
|
•
|
lower selling prices;
|
|
•
|
increased selling incentives;
|
|
•
|
lower profit margins;
|
|
•
|
impairments in the value of inventory and other assets;
|
|
•
|
difficulty in acquiring suitable land, raw materials, and skilled labor at acceptable prices or terms; and
|
|
•
|
delays in construction of our homes.
|
An oversupply of alternatives to new homes and reduction in homebuyer demand can adversely impact our ability to sell new homes.
An oversupply of alternatives to new homes, including foreclosed homes, homes held for sale by investors and speculators, and other existing homes and rental properties, can adversely impact our ability to sell new homes, depress new home prices and reduce our margins on the sales of new homes. High levels of foreclosures not only contribute to additional inventory available for sale, but can also reduce appraisal valuations for new homes, potentially resulting in lower sales prices. Recent indicators continue to show that the glut of foreclosures in the Arizona market is abating but that Florida may continue to see foreclosures for some time. It is difficult to calculate the total number of units at foreclosure risk due to potential “shadow inventory.” Shadow inventory can occur when lenders put properties that have been foreclosed or forfeited to lenders on the market gradually, rather than all at once, or delay the foreclosure process.
TPG Aviator, L.P. is a significant stockholder and may have conflicts of interest with us in the future.
As of December 31, 2013, TPG Aviator, L.P. ("TPG Aviator") owned approximately 41.9% of our common stock. As a result, TPG Aviator is our largest single stockholder. In addition, so long as TPG Aviator owns at least 10% of our issued and outstanding common stock, TPG Aviator has a pre-emptive right to participate in our future equity issuances, subject to certain conditions. This concentration of ownership in one stockholder could potentially be disadvantageous to other stockholders' interests. In addition, if TPG Aviator were to sell or otherwise transfer all or a large percentage of its holdings, our stock price could decline, and we could find it difficult to raise capital, if needed, through the sale of additional equity securities.
The interests of TPG Aviator and its affiliates may differ from the interests of our other stockholders in material respects. For example, TPG Aviator and its affiliates may have an interest in directly or indirectly pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their other equity investments, even though such transactions might involve risks to us. TPG Aviator and its affiliates are in the business of making or advising on investments in companies, including businesses that directly or indirectly compete with certain portions of our business. They may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.
Our stockholders agreement with TPG Aviator grants TPG Aviator certain rights that may restrain our ability to take various actions in the future.
In connection with TPG Aviator's June 2013 investment in us, we entered into a stockholders agreement with TPG Aviator, pursuant to which we granted TPG Aviator certain rights that may restrict our ability to take various actions in the future. Under the stockholders agreement, we agreed to increase the size of our board of directors to ten members and, assuming TPG Aviator and its affiliates hold at least 80% of our common stock they held, or were deemed to hold, at closing of TPG Aviator's investment, then TPG Aviator is entitled to nominate four directors, of which they have currently designated three.
TPG Aviator has the right to nominate a specified number of directors to the board and to appoint a specified number of such directors appointed to each committee of the board of directors for so long as TPG Aviator's ownership percentage of our common stock is equal to or greater than 5%. TPG Aviator is entitled to nominate to the board: (i) four directors if TPG Aviator's ownership percentage of our common stock is at least 30%, (ii) three directors if TPG Aviator's ownership percentage is at least 20% but less than 30%, (iii) two directors if TPG Aviator's ownership percentage is at least 15% but less than 20%, and (iv) one director if TPG Aviator's ownership percentage is at least 5% but less than 15%.
11
In addition, we agreed to constitute each of our compensation committee and finance committee as a five member committee and (i) for so long as the ownership of TPG Aviator and its affiliates of our common stock is at least 15%, TPG Aviator has the right to have two board members appointed to each such committee, and (ii) for so long as the ownership of TPG Aviator and its affiliates of our common stock is at least 5% but less than 15%, TPG Aviator has the right to have one board member appointed to each such committee. For so long as the ownership of TPG Aviator and its affiliates of our common stock is at least 5%, each other committee of our board (other than the executive committee, which shall be the whole board) will be constituted as three member committees, and TPG Aviator has the right to have one board member appointed to each such committee.
In addition, for so long as TPG Aviator's ownership percentage of our common stock is equal to or greater than 5%, the rights and responsibilities of the finance committee of the board will include (1) except for certain permitted issuances relating to outstanding rights to purchase or acquire our capital stock, compensation arrangements and acquisition transactions, any sale or issuance of any capital stock or other security, (2) any redemption, purchase, repurchase or other acquisition of securities by AV Homes or any subsidiary, other than in connection with equity compensation arrangements, (3) any incurrence of indebtedness or certain debt-like obligations, with limited exceptions, (4) any hiring or firing of members of senior management, (5) any land or builder acquisitions or dispositions, any acquisitions or dispositions of subsidiaries or any other acquisitions or dispositions, in each case, that are greater than $5,000 (including total expected capital requirements and development costs), (6) any capital expenditures or land commitments over an agreed upon budget, as approved by our board of directors, or otherwise greater than $10,000, and (7) any entry into new markets or lines of business. During such period, the rights and responsibilities of the compensation committee will include (1) any adoption of any new, or expansion of any existing, equity incentive plan and (2) any changes to, or the adoption of, any compensation arrangements for any members of our board of directors or our senior management. During such period, our board may not approve such matters without the requisite committee approval, which in most cases will require the approval of at least one of the committee members appointed by TPG Aviator.
Pursuant to the terms of the stockholders agreement, TPG Aviator also has the right to consent to certain actions related to our corporate existence and governance, including any change in the rights and responsibilities of either the finance committee or the compensation committee, for so long as TPG Aviator's ownership percentage of our common stock is equal to or greater than 10% and equal to or greater than 25% of the number of shares owned by them at closing of the TPG Aviator investment.
Our business is capital-intensive and requires access to sufficient capital.
Our business is capital-intensive and requires significant up-front expenditures to acquire land and begin development. We must make significant capital expenditures to commence development of a community and bear the costs of the development until we sell the homes. Accordingly, our ability to access capital is a key factor in our ability to service our indebtedness, cover our operating expenses and fund our other liquidity needs. We expect to seek additional capital from time to time from a variety of sources, including bank financings and/or securities offerings, to cover our liquidity needs and grow our business. Deterioration in our creditworthiness would require significant management time and effort in addition to management's primary task of running our homebuilding business and make it difficult and costly for us to access debt capital or engage in other ordinary course financing transactions, including the provision of credit support to community infrastructure financing transactions relating to our new developments. Any difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital for planned development expenditures could cause project delays and any such delay could result in cost increases and may adversely affect our sales and future results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, we use letters of credit and surety bonds to secure our performance under various construction and land development agreements, escrow agreements, financial guarantees and other arrangements. Should our future performance or economic conditions continue to make such letters of credit and surety bonds costly or difficult to obtain or lead to us being required to collateralize such instruments to a greater extent than previously, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.
Each indenture governing our 7.50% Notes, the 7.50% Exchange Notes, the 4.50% Notes, and any future indebtedness, contain or may contain financial and operating restrictions that may affect our ability to operate our business.
Each indenture governing the 7.50% Notes, the 7.50% Exchange Notes, and the 4.50% Notes (as defined in Note 5 "Notes Payable" to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II) contain various covenants that, among other things, require the maintenance of a certain amount of cash and cash equivalents and limit our ability to merge or sell assets. In addition, the agreements governing any future indebtedness may contain restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness, grant certain liens to support indebtedness, enter into certain affiliate transactions and make certain distributions. These covenants
12
could adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs, engage in, expand or pursue our business activities and prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial to us. In particular, any future restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness may limit our ability to undertake new large scale master-planned development opportunities, and may thereby adversely affect our future growth and results of operations.
We may be unable to purchase the notes on certain specified dates or upon a fundamental change or designated event.
The holders of the 4.50% Notes have the right to require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes on April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019, at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. We may not have the funds necessary on such dates to make the required repurchase of notes. In addition, we may not have the funds necessary to fulfill our obligations under the 7.50% Notes, the 7.50% Exchange Notes, or the 4.50% Notes following a “fundamental change” as defined in each indenture governing the 7.50% Notes and the 7.50% Exchange Notes or a “designated event” as defined in the indenture governing the 4.50% Notes. Upon the occurrence of a defined fundamental change, which definition includes a change of control (whether it be voluntary or involuntary), or a defined designated event, we will be required to offer to repurchase all of the applicable outstanding notes at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. However, we may not have sufficient funds at the time of any such event to make the required repurchase of the notes. Our failure to make or complete an offer to repurchase notes in connection with any such event would place us in default under each indenture governing the applicable notes.
We have contingent liabilities, and if any of such liabilities are called upon, it could have an adverse effect on our liquidity and results of operations.
In October of 2012, Osceola County, Polk County, the Osceola County Expressway Authority (the "Expressway Authority") and Avatar Properties Inc., one of our wholly owned subsidiaries ("API), entered in to an Agreement for Development of the Poinciana Parkway, a roadway intended to relieve congestion in the Poinciana area, where we hold significant land positions, by connecting it to regional roadways.
Pursuant to the Development Agreement, API has assigned to the Expressway Authority all of API's current plans for the Poinciana Parkway. The Expressway Authority has selected a general contractor to design the final configuration of the Poinciana Parkway and to construct the roadway once bond financing is obtained. Construction is contingent on bond financing obtained by Osceola County and cash contributions by Polk and Osceola Counties, which may be funded by grant monies or other sources to be determined. If all required funds are obtained and the Development Agreement is closed, API will (i) assign at no cost its current permits for the Poinciana Parkway to the Expressway Authority and (ii) donate to Polk County or Osceola County, as applicable, certain rights of way for the Poinciana Parkway and certain additional rights of way that will accommodate both the arterial and southern connector facilities to Osceola and Polk Counties. The Expressway Authority shall be responsible for construction of the Poinciana Parkway at no cost to API. The toll portion of the Poinciana Parkway shall be operated and maintained by the Expressway Authority, and all excess toll revenues shall be used to fund transportation facilities in the Poinciana area. Other portions of the Poinciana Parkway will be owned by Polk County or Osceola County, as applicable.
If funding and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be achieved as contemplated by the Development Agreement, the counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance for API's failure to perform under prior agreements with Polk and Osceola Counties regarding its obligation to fund and construct the Poinciana Parkway. If the Development Agreement is terminated because funding of the Poinciana Parkway construction does not occur, API shall be entitled to a one year extension of certain of its prior agreements with Osceola County. If during such extension, API cannot obtain financing and begin construction of the Poinciana Parkway: (i) a portion of API's land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other homebuilders in the county and (ii) API will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
In addition, certain of our communities have homeowners associations ("HOAs"), and we plan to have HOAs at most of our future communities. In most of our existing communities, HOA dues paid by residents are insufficient to pay for all operating expenses and, therefore, we subsidize those HOAs. We expect that to be the case in new communities as well in the early stages of selling out those communities. Pursuant to these arrangements, we may become obligated to make greater payments, if assessments levied on and paid by homeowners are insufficient to cover such operating expenses when due.
In the event that we are called upon to satisfy any of these contingent liabilities, or any other contingent liabilities that may arise in the ordinary course of business but that have not come to our attention to date, it could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
13
We have a significant number of development liabilities related to our predecessor and its affiliates, over which we have little or no control as to the dates that payment may be required, and which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We have a significant number of development liabilities related to our predecessor and its affiliates, most of which relate to class action settlement agreements entered into by us in 1974 and the bankruptcy of our predecessor and its affiliates in the mid-1970s (collectively, the “Orders”). Among other things, under the Orders, we are obligated to install certain utility infrastructure to lots sold by us in Rio Rico, Arizona and Poinciana, Florida prior to such Orders (“Affected Lots”). Historically, we have identified such contingent obligations with respect to the Orders as evaluated by the report of an independent engineer. In 2011, our management determined that such engineer estimates should be further evaluated by another independent engineer. The second engineer's report reflected a much greater cost to complete the utility infrastructure at Rio Rico as a result of more accurate measurements of linear feet of utility lines required, cost updates and advanced techniques in identifying the location and number of Affected Lots. Our management also determined that an error was made in 2005 when the total mileage of water pipe mains required was reduced based on assumptions that are not supported by our current research. Our estimate of the liability has been accrued and is included in the Estimated Development Liability for Sold Land line item in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013. If a significant number of the owners of the Affected Lots require AV Homes to install infrastructure in Rio Rico or Poinciana, it is possible that it would have a material impact on our liquidity.
The reduction in availability of mortgage financing has adversely affected our business, and the duration and ultimate severity of the effects are uncertain.
Lenders, regulators and others have questioned the adequacy of lending standards and other credit requirements for several loan products and programs offered in recent years. Credit requirements have tightened, and investor demand for mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities has declined. The deterioration in credit quality has caused almost all lenders to stop offering subprime mortgages and most other loan products that are not eligible for sale to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or loans that do not meet Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and Veterans Administration (“VA”) requirements. Fewer loan products, tighter loan qualifications and a reduced willingness of lenders to make loans, in turn, have made it more difficult for many buyers to sell their homes or to finance the purchase of our homes. These factors have served to reduce the pool of qualified home buyers. These reductions in demand have adversely affected our business and financial results, and the duration and severity of their effects are uncertain. The liquidity provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the mortgage industry historically has been very important to the housing market. Any changes in the ongoing role of these entities could have a material impact on the financing market and our ability to sell homes.
While the use of down payment assistance programs by our homebuyers has decreased significantly, some of our customers still utilize 100% financing through programs offered by the VA and United States Department of Agriculture. There can be no assurance that these programs or other programs will continue to be available or will be as attractive to our customers as the programs currently offered, which could negatively affect our sales.
Because many of our customers require mortgage financing, increases in interest rates and changes in federal lending programs or other regulations could lower demand for our products, limit our marketing effectiveness and limit our ability to fully realize our backlog.
A significant percentage of our customers finance their home purchases through lenders that provide mortgage financing. Increases in interest rates could lower demand for new homes because monthly mortgage costs to potential homebuyers would increase. Even if potential new homebuyers do not need financing, changes in interest rates could make it harder for them to sell their existing homes to potential buyers who need financing. This could prevent or limit our ability to attract new customers as well as our ability to fully realize our backlog because our sales contracts often include a financing or sale contingency. Financing contingencies permit buyers to cancel sales contracts in the event that mortgage financing at prevailing interest rates is unobtainable within the period specified in the contract. This contingency period is typically four to eight weeks following the date of execution of the sales contract. Our exposure to such financing contingencies renders us vulnerable to changes in prevailing interest rates.
In addition, as a result of the turbulence in the credit markets and mortgage finance industry, the federal government has taken on a significant role in supporting mortgage lending through its conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both of which purchase home mortgages and mortgage-backed securities originated by mortgage lenders, and its insurance of mortgages originated by lenders through the FHA and the VA. The availability and affordability of mortgage loans, including consumer interest rates for such loans, could be adversely affected by a curtailment or cessation of the federal government's
14
mortgage-related programs or policies. The FHA may continue to impose stricter loan qualification standards, raise minimum down payment requirements, impose higher mortgage insurance premiums and other costs, and/or limit the number of mortgages it insures. Due to growing federal budget deficits, the U.S. Treasury may not be able to continue supporting the mortgage-related activities of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FHA and the VA at present levels, or it may revise significantly the federal government's participation in and support of the residential mortgage market. Because the availability of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA- and VA-backed mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing and selling many of our homes, any limitations, restrictions or changes in the availability of such government-backed financing could reduce our home sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
Further, the government shutdown highlighted the role of the federal government in the mortgage lending market. Any future government shutdowns may have a material impact on the financing market and our ability to sell homes. Furthermore, in July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law. This legislation provides for a number of new requirements relating to residential mortgages and mortgage lending practices, many of which are to be developed further by implementing rules. These include, among others, minimum standards for mortgages and lender practices in making mortgages, limitations on certain fees and incentive arrangements, retention of credit risk and remedies for borrowers in foreclosure proceedings. The effect of such provisions on lending institutions will depend on the rules that are ultimately enacted. However, these requirements, as and when implemented, are expected to reduce the availability of loans to borrowers and/or increase the costs to borrowers to obtain such loans. Any such reduction could result in a decline of our home sales, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Increased regulation of the mortgage industry could harm our future sales and earnings.
The mortgage industry is under intense scrutiny and is facing increasing regulation at the federal, state and local level. Changes in regulation have the potential to negatively impact the full spectrum of mortgage related activity. Potential changes to federal laws and regulations could have the effect of limiting the activities of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the entities that provide liquidity to the secondary mortgage market, which could lead to increases in mortgage interest rates. At the same time, changes to the FHA's rules to require increased borrower FICO scores, increased down payment amounts, and potentially limiting the amount of permitted seller concessions lessen the number of buyers able to finance a new home. All of these regulatory activities reduce the number of potential buyers who qualify for the financing necessary to purchase our homes, which could harm our future sales and earnings.
Cancellations of home sales orders in backlog may increase as homebuyers choose to not honor their contracts.
We believe that the elevated cancellation rate experienced in each of the last five years was largely a result of reduced homebuyer confidence as a result of price declines and the number of foreclosures and the difficulties surrounding obtaining mortgage financing. A more restrictive mortgage lending environment and the inability of some buyers to sell their existing homes have also impacted cancellations. Many of these factors are beyond our control, and it is uncertain whether they will cause cancellation rates to rise again in the future. Any increase in cancellations of home sales orders in backlog may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
Declines in home prices and sales order activities in Florida, Arizona and North Carolina would materially and adversely impact our results of operations because we conduct our homebuilding business in these states.
Our operations are concentrated in regions that were among the most severely affected by the economic downturn. Home prices and sales activities in these states declined significantly since the end of 2006 and at a greater rate than the country as a whole. While we have seen some improvement in these markets in 2013, if these states continue to experience economic difficulties, including elevated levels of unemployment and precarious budget situations at the state and local government level, such conditions may materially adversely affect the market for our homes in those affected areas. Because we have only limited operations in other states, declines in home prices and sales activity in Florida, Arizona and North Carolina adversely affect our results of operations.
Inflation could adversely affect our business and financial results, particularly in a period of oversupply of homes.
Inflation can adversely affect us by increasing costs of land, materials and labor. We may not be able to offset any such cost increases with higher sales prices because of a continuation of the oversupply of homes relative to demand. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which have a negative impact on housing demand. In such an environment, we may not be able to raise home prices sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation and we may not be able to pass on any such increases to customers who have already entered into sales contracts, which may be well in advance of the
15
construction of the home, which could cause our margins to decrease. Moreover, with inflation, our costs of capital increase, and the purchasing power of our cash resources can decline.
Price increases, supply shortages and other risks related to demand for building materials and skilled labor could increase our costs and delay deliveries.
The purchase price of building materials is increasing, most notably the price of wood, drywall, steel and insulation. The related shipping costs are also increasing. Should these trends continue, our results of operations may be impacted adversely. The homebuilding industry has from time to time experienced significant difficulties that can affect the cost or timing of construction including:
|
•
|
shortages of qualified trades people;
|
|
•
|
reliance on local subcontractors, manufacturers and distributors who may be inadequately capitalized;
|
|
•
|
shortages of materials; and
|
|
•
|
volatile increases in the cost of materials, particularly increases in the price of lumber, drywall and cement, which are significant components of home construction costs.
|
These difficulties may cause us to take longer or incur more costs to build our homes and materially adversely affect our revenues and margins. To the extent the housing market continues to recover and the demand for labor and materials increases, our average per home cost of labor and building materials will likely increase, and our operating margins and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our business and results of operations are dependent on the availability and skill of subcontractors.
Substantially all of our construction work is done by third-party subcontractors with us acting as the general contractor. Accordingly, the timing and quality of our construction depend on the availability and skill of our subcontractors. While we generally anticipate being able to obtain sufficient materials and reliable subcontractors and believe that our relationships with subcontractors are good, the availability of qualified subcontractors in our markets has at times been constrained. We do not have long-term contractual commitments with any subcontractors, and there can be no assurance that skilled subcontractors will continue to be available at reasonable rates and in the areas in which we conduct our operations. The inability to contract with skilled subcontractors at reasonable costs on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, despite our quality control efforts, we may discover that our subcontractors were engaging in improper construction practices or installing defective materials in our homes. Any such issues may increase our warranty and customer service costs, subject us to fines or other penalties or injure our reputation.
Elimination or reduction of the tax benefits associated with owning a home could prevent potential customers from buying our homes and adversely affect our business or financial results.
Significant expenses of owning a home, including mortgage interest and real estate taxes, generally are deductible expenses for an individual's federal, and in some cases, state income taxes, subject to various limitations under current tax law and policy. If the federal government or a state government changes its income tax laws, as has been discussed from time to time, to eliminate or substantially modify these income tax deductions, the after-tax cost of owning a new home would increase for many of our potential customers. The resulting loss or reduction of homeowner tax deductions, if such tax law changes were enacted without offsetting provisions, would adversely impact demand for and sales prices of new homes. In addition, increases in property tax rates by local governmental authorities can adversely affect the ability of potential customers to obtain financing or the desire of potential customers to purchase new homes.
Homebuilding is subject to home warranty and construction defect claims and other litigation risks in the ordinary course of business that can be significant. Our operating expenses could increase if we are required to pay higher insurance premiums or incur substantial litigation costs with respect to such claims and risks.
As a homebuilder, we are subject to home warranty and construction defect claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We record customer service and warranty reserves for the homes that we sell based on historical experience in our markets and our judgment of the qualitative risks associated with the types of homes built. Because of the uncertainties inherent in these matters, we cannot provide assurance that our reserves will be adequate to address all of our warranty and construction defect claims in the future. Increasingly in recent years, individual and class action lawsuits have been filed against
16
homebuilders asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by a variety of issues, including faulty materials and the presence of mold in residential dwellings.
Furthermore, decreases in home values as a result of general economic conditions may result in an increase in construction defect claims, as well as claims based on marketing and sales practices. Our reserves may not cover all of the claims arising from such issues, or we may experience litigation costs and losses that could impact our profitability. Even if we are successful in defending such claims, we may incur significant costs.
Our success depends on the availability of suitable undeveloped land and improved lots at acceptable prices and our having sufficient liquidity to acquire such properties.
Our success in developing land and in building and selling homes depends in part upon the continued availability of suitable undeveloped land and improved lots at acceptable prices. The availability of undeveloped land and improved lots for purchase at favorable prices depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including the risk of competitive over-bidding on land and lots and restrictive governmental regulation. Should suitable land opportunities become less available, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell would be reduced, which would have an adverse effect on our revenue and profits. In addition, our ability to make land purchases will depend upon us having sufficient liquidity to fund such purchases. We may be at a disadvantage in competing for land due to our debt obligations and restrictive covenants and as a result of our reduced access to capital compared to some of our competitors.
If we are unable to develop our communities successfully or within expected timeframes, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Before a community generates any revenues, time and material expenditures are required to acquire land, obtain development approvals and construct significant portions of project infrastructure, amenities, model homes and sales facilities. A decline in our ability to develop and market our communities successfully and to generate positive cash flow from these operations in a timely manner would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and on our ability to service our debt and to meet our working capital requirements.
Our business is seasonal in nature, and our quarterly operating results can fluctuate.
Our quarterly operating results generally fluctuate by season. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in the winter and spring months, although new order activity is also highly dependent on the number of actively selling communities and the timing of new community openings as well as other market factors. We may experience higher liquidity demands during the first half of the calendar year as we incur the costs associated with new construction resulting from the increased sales volume. If, due to construction delays or other reasons, we are unable to deliver our expected number of homes in the second half of the calendar year, our full year results of operations may be adversely affected.
We may be adversely affected by weather conditions and natural disasters.
Weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, wildfires, droughts and floods, can harm our homebuilding business. These can delay home closings, adversely affect the cost or availability of materials or labor, or damage homes under construction. The climates of the states in which we operate present increased risks of adverse weather or natural disasters. In particular, a large portion of our homebuilding operations is concentrated in Florida, which is subject to increased risk of hurricanes. Furthermore, if our insurance does not fully cover losses resulting from these events or any related business interruption, our assets, financial condition and capital resources could be adversely affected.
Resource shortages or rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our operations.
The areas in which we operate are subject to resource shortages, including significant changes to the availability of water. Shortages of natural resources, particularly water, may make it more difficult for us to obtain regulatory approval of new developments. We may incur additional costs and may not be able to complete construction on a timely basis if such shortages continue. Furthermore, these shortages may adversely affect the regional economies in which we operate, which may reduce demand for our homes. In addition, the cost of petroleum products, which are used both to deliver our materials and to transport our employees to our job sites, fluctuates and may increase as a result of geopolitical events or accidents. This could also result in higher prices for any product utilizing petrochemicals. These cost increases may have an adverse effect on our operating margin and results of operations.
Values of, and costs associated with, our land and lot inventory could adversely affect our business or financial results.
17
The risks inherent in controlling or purchasing, holding and developing land for new home construction are substantial and increase as consumer demand for housing decreases. The value of undeveloped land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. If the fair market value of the land, lots and inventories we hold decreases, we may be required to reduce the carrying value of these assets and take significant impairment charges as we did in 2012. We may have acquired options on or bought and developed land at a cost we will not be able to recover fully or on which we cannot build and sell homes profitably. In addition, our deposits for building lots controlled under option or similar contracts may be put at risk. In certain circumstances, a grant of entitlements or development agreement with respect to a particular piece of land may include restrictions on the transfer of such entitlements to a buyer of such land, which may increase our exposure to decreases in the price of such entitled land by restricting our ability to sell it for its full entitled value. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in reduced margins or losses in a poorly performing community or market. In the present weak market conditions, we have sold homes and land for lower margins or at a loss and we have recorded significant inventory impairment charges and such conditions may persist. Because future market conditions are uncertain, we cannot provide assurance that we will be successful in managing our future inventory risks or avoiding future impairment charges. Any material write-downs of assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, some real estate investments are relatively difficult to sell quickly. As a result, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions may be limited, and we may be forced to hold non-income producing assets for an extended period of time. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms that we set or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.
Reduced home sales may impair our ability to recoup development costs or force us to absorb additional costs.
We incur many costs before we begin to build homes in a community. Depending on the stage of development a land parcel is in when acquired, such costs may include costs of preparing land; finishing and entitling lots; installing roads, sewers, water systems and other utilities; building amenities in our age-restricted and age-targeted communities; taxes and other costs related to ownership of the land on which we plan to build homes; and promotional marketing and overhead expenses to prepare for the opening of a new home community for sales. In addition, local municipalities may impose requirements resulting in additional costs. If the rate at which we sell and deliver homes slows or falls, or if we delay the opening of new home communities for sales due to adjustments in our marketing strategy or other reasons, each of which has occurred throughout the housing downturn, we may incur additional costs, and it will take a longer period of time for us to recover our costs.
Although we operate in two primary markets, we have a high concentration of land assets in the Poinciana area market and are particularly susceptible to market fluctuations in that region.
Historically, our goals for the ownership and control of land and building lots were based on management's expectations for future volume growth in Florida, and in particular, the Poinciana/Kissimmee area. In light of weak market conditions encountered since 2006, prior projections were not realized, and we have a very high concentration of assets in this market. Because future market conditions are uncertain, and our assets are so highly concentrated, we are limited in the amount of land we can dispose of to supplement cash flow from home sales. Our flexibility in responding to changes in market conditions, including our ability to respond to further declines in the housing market or to benefit from a return to growth, has also been reduced as a result of our land and lot positions in such a concentrated area.
We are dependent on the services of our senior management team and certain of our key employees, and the loss of their services could hurt our business.
We believe that our management's experience in the homebuilding industry is a competitive strength, and that our future success depends upon our ability to retain these executives. In addition, we believe that our ability to attract, train, assimilate and retain new skilled personnel is important to the success of our business. If we are unable to retain our senior management team and certain of our key employees, or attract, train, assimilate or retain other skilled personnel in the future, it could hinder the execution of our business strategy.
Our current efforts to grow and expand our operations could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or profitability.
18
We recently announced the formation of a new Carolinas division and the acquisition of property in North Carolina and we continue to consider opportunities for growth, in both our existing markets and in new markets. Additional growth of our business, either through increased land purchases, the development of larger projects, or into new business lines may have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or profitability. Any expansion of our business into new markets or new businesses could divert the attention of senior management from our existing business and could fail due to our relative lack of experience in those markets or businesses. In addition, we may pursue opportunities to acquire other companies from third parties, such as our recent acquisition of Royal Oak Homes LLC, and any such acquisition could be difficult to integrate with our operations and could require us to assume unanticipated liabilities or expenses. Acquisitions also involve numerous risks, including the risk of impairing inventory and other assets related to the acquisition, the diversion of management’s attention and resources from other business concerns, risks associated with entering markets in which we have limited or no direct experience and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.
Government regulations could increase the cost and limit the availability of our development and homebuilding projects and adversely affect our business or financial results.
We are subject to extensive and complex regulations that affect land development and home construction, including zoning, density restrictions, building design and building standards. These regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering governmental authorities as to the conditions we must meet prior to being approved, if approved at all. Land parcels we acquire are generally undeveloped and typically do not have all (or sometimes any) of the governmental approvals necessary to develop and construct homes. If we are unable to obtain these approvals or obtain approvals that restrict our ability to use the land in ways we do not anticipate, the value of the parcel will be negatively impacted. We are subject to determinations by these authorities as to the adequacy of water and sewage facilities, roads and other local services. Laws and regulations are subject to frequent change and often result in increased construction or other costs related to our business. In some instances, we must comply with laws that require commitments from us to provide roads and other offsite infrastructure to be in place prior to the commencement of new construction. New housing developments may also be subject to various fees and assessments for schools, parks, streets and other public improvements. Furthermore, restrictions on immigration can create a shortage of skilled labor. Any of these regulatory issues can limit or delay home construction and increase our operating costs. We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws and regulations concerning protection of health, safety and the environment. These matters may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation, mitigation and other costs or subject us to costs from fines, penalties and related litigation. These laws and regulations can also prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity in environmentally sensitive areas.
We may not realize our deferred income tax assets. In addition, our net operating loss carryforwards could be substantially limited if we experience an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, and our rights agreement, which is intended to preserve our NOLs, may not be effective.
Since the end of our 2007 fiscal year, we have generated significant net operating losses (“NOL”), and we may generate additional NOL in 2014. Under federal tax laws, we can use our NOL (and certain related tax credits) to reduce our future taxable income for up to 20 years, after which they expire for such purposes. Until they expire, we can carry forward our NOL (and certain related tax credits) that we do not use in any particular year to reduce our taxable income in future years, and we have recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets that include the NOL (and certain related tax credits) that we have generated but have not yet realized. At December 31, 2013, we had deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, totaling $130,232 against which we have provided a full valuation allowance. Our ability to realize our net deferred tax assets is based on the extent to which we generate sustained profits, and we cannot provide any assurances as to when and to what extent we will generate sufficient future taxable income to realize our net deferred tax assets, whether in whole or in part.
The majority of our net deferred tax asset is federal related and is valued at a 35% corporate income tax rate. If, as some lawmakers have proposed, the U.S. corporate income tax rate is lowered, we would be required to write down a roughly proportionate amount of the value of our federal net deferred tax asset to account for this lower rate. We would also need to record a corresponding write down of our valuation allowance. The lower tax rate would reduce our future federal taxes, which may put a portion of our tax credits at risk of expiring before we could use them.
In addition, the benefits of our NOL, built-in losses and tax credits would be reduced or eliminated if we experience an “ownership change,” as determined under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”). A Section 382 ownership change occurs if a stockholder or a group of stockholders who are deemed to own at least 5% of our common stock increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. If an ownership change were to occur, Section 382 would impose an annual limit on the amount of NOL we could use to reduce our taxable income equal to the product of the total value of our outstanding equity immediately prior to the
19
ownership change (reduced by certain items specified in Section 382) and the federal long-term tax-exempt interest rate in effect for the month of the ownership change. A number of complex rules apply in calculating this annual limit. Any limitation that could significantly impair the value of our NOL would have a material negative impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On June 19, 2013, we adopted a rights agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) intended to protect our NOLs from the potential negative consequence of an ownership change as defined in Section 382. The Rights Agreement is designed to deter acquisitions of our common stock that would (i) result in a stockholder owning 4.9% or more of our outstanding shares, or (ii) increase an existing 4.9% or greater stockholder's percentage ownership of our stock as of June 19, 2013, by diluting the ownership interest of a stockholder whose ownership after the adoption of the Rights Agreement exceeds those thresholds, unless the stockholder obtains an exemption from our Board of Directors acting through its finance committee.
Although the Rights Agreement is intended to reduce the likelihood of an ownership change that could adversely affect us, we cannot assure that it would prevent all transfers that could result in such an ownership change. In addition, in connection with the investment by TPG Aviator, we agreed that TPG Aviator and its affiliates and associates are exempt persons under the Rights Agreement and that any person who acquires common stock and such person's affiliates and associates, will be exempt persons under the Rights Agreement, in each case subject to certain conditions and exceptions. Accordingly, TPG Aviator could effect transfers of its shares that would cause an ownership change and reduce or eliminate our NOL credits. Because the Rights Agreement may restrict a stockholder's ability to acquire our stock, the liquidity and market value of our stock might be affected.
The Rights Agreement will terminate upon the earliest of (i) June 19, 2016, (ii) our Board of Directors' determination that the Rights Agreement is no longer needed for the preservation of NOLs due to the implementation of legislative changes, or any other reason, or (iii) certain other events described in the Rights Agreement, including our Board of Directors' determination that termination is in our best interest. Our Board of Directors could determine to extend the term of the Rights Agreement upon the expiration of its current term or adopt another Rights Agreement if it determines that it is in the best interest of our stockholders.
We may be required to pay taxes and interest to the IRS as a result of the sale of certain land to the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of Florida if the IRS determines that we did not acquire adequate replacement properties.
In 2006, we sold property we owned in Marion County, Florida to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida under threat of condemnation. The bulk of the land was transferred in 2006, and the final closing took place in 2007. These transactions and subsequent correspondence with the IRS entitled us to defer payment of income taxes of approximately $24,400 from the gain on these sales until we sell replacement property provided we obtained qualifying replacement property for the Marion property by December 31, 2010. We believe that we acquired appropriate replacement properties by December 31, 2010. If the IRS determines in the future that some or all of the properties acquired by us as replacement properties do not qualify as replacement properties, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the value of the portion of the properties determined not to qualify as replacement property.
We may incur additional operating expenses or delays due to compliance requirements or fines, penalties and remediation costs pertaining to environmental regulations within our markets.
We are subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning land use and the protection of health and the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants to water and air, the handling of hazardous materials and the cleanup of contaminated sites. The particular impact and requirements of environmental laws that apply to any given community vary greatly according to the community site, the site's environmental conditions and the present and former use of the site. We expect that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on homebuilders in the future. Environmental laws may result in delays, cause us to implement time consuming and expensive compliance programs and prohibit or severely restrict development in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas. Environmental regulations can also have an adverse impact on the availability and price of certain raw materials, such as lumber. Furthermore, we could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines, penalties and other sanctions and damages from third-party claims for property damage or personal injury, as a result of our failure to comply with, or liabilities under, applicable environmental laws and regulations. In addition, we are subject to third-party challenges under environmental laws and regulations to the permits and other approvals required for our projects and operations.
Changes in global or regional environmental conditions and governmental actions in response to such changes may adversely affect us by increasing the costs of or restricting our planned or future growth activities.
20
There is growing concern from members of the scientific community and the general public that an increase in global average temperatures due to emissions of greenhouse gases and other human activities have or will cause significant changes in weather patterns and increase the frequency and severity of natural disasters. An increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions and environmental events could limit, delay and/or increase the costs to develop land and build new homes and reduce the value of our land and housing inventory in locations that become less desirable to consumers or blocked to development. Projected climate change, if it occurs, may exacerbate the scarcity of water and other natural resources in affected regions, which could limit, prevent or increase the costs of residential development in certain areas. In addition, government mandates, standards or regulations intended to mitigate or reduce greenhouse gas emissions or projected climate change impacts could result in prohibitions or severe restrictions on land development in certain areas, increased energy, transportation and raw material costs that make building materials less available or more expensive, or cause us to incur compliance expenses and other financial obligations to meet permitting or land development- or home construction-related requirements that we may be unable to fully recover (due to market conditions or other factors), and may reduce our housing gross profit margins and may adversely impact our consolidated financial statements, potentially to a material degree. As a result, climate change impacts, and laws and land development and home construction standards, and/or the manner in which they are interpreted or implemented, to address potential climate change impacts, could increase our costs and have a long-term adverse impact on our business and our consolidated financial statements.
As we continue to increase our dependence on digital technologies to conduct operations, our risks associated with cyber security have also increased, leaving us subject to possible frequent and severe cyber incidents.
For a number of years, we have been increasing our reliance on computers and digital technology. Many of our files have been digitized and more of our employees are working in almost paperless environments. We have also made changes, some significant, to our hardware and software environments and some of these transitions have not been successful, taken longer than anticipated and/or are still in progress. All of these activities may give rise to material cyber security risks and potential costs and consequences that cannot be estimated or predicted with any certainty. We have outsourced a number of our IT functions including IT support of our infrastructure and software. We are continuing to take steps to secure our confidential information from our vendors as well as third parties who may be seeking to infiltrate our systems. At this time we do not have any specific insurance for cyber security events. Management will continue to monitor our IT environment and determine whether our business operations merit further insurance coverage. Although we have not experienced any cyber attacks to date, we consider a future cyber attack a material concern that could have severe financial and other business implications.
There may be future sales or other dilution of our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Issuances of shares of common stock upon conversion of our 7.50% Notes, 7.50% Exchange Notes and 4.50% Notes, as well as the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock or other equity-related securities either for new consideration or in connection with restructuring existing indebtedness, could depress the market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Any such future issuances could dilute the ownership interests of stockholders, and we cannot predict the effect that future issuances of our common stock or other equity-related securities would have on the market price of our common stock, nor can we predict our future needs to fund our operations or balance sheet with future equity issuances.
21
ITEM 1B . UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
AV Homes’ operations are summarized in “Item 1. Business” above and described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Land developed and in the process of being developed, or held for investment and/or future development, is set forth in Note 2 "Land and Other Inventories" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Our corporate office is in Scottsdale, Arizona. For information concerning properties leased by AV Homes, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 6 - Lease Commitments.”
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that any current pending legal or administrative proceedings or disputes will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, we cannot assure you that the ultimate resolution of any of these proceedings or disputes will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “AVHI”. There were approximately 3,169 record holders of common stock at February 26, 2014.
The high and low sales prices per share, as reported, for each fiscal quarter during the last two years were:
|
Quarter Ended
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
March 31
|
$15.28
|
|
$12.97
|
|
$12.90
|
|
$7.03
|
|
June 30
|
$17.73
|
|
$12.09
|
|
$14.74
|
|
$10.29
|
|
September 30
|
$17.64
|
|
$15.42
|
|
$16.13
|
|
$11.81
|
|
December 31
|
$20.17
|
|
$17.36
|
|
$15.68
|
|
$11.34
|
We have not declared any cash dividends on common stock since our incorporation and have no current plan to pay cash dividends. During the year ended December 31,
2013
, we did not repurchase any outstanding shares of common stock.
Performance Graph
The following line graph compares for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 (a) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return (i.e., the change in share price plus the cumulative amount of dividends, assuming dividend reinvestment, divided by the initial share price, expressed as a percentage) on our common shares, with (b) the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Market Index, and with (c) the Dow Jones Home Construction Index. The Dow Jones Home Construction Index is a widely-recognized index comprised primarily of large national homebuilders.
22
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG AV HOMES, INC., NASDAQ MARKET INDEX, AND PEER INDEX
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
AV Homes
|
100.00
|
|
64.14
|
|
74.74
|
|
27.07
|
|
53.62
|
|
68.51
|
|
Dow Jones Home Construction Index
|
100.00
|
|
116.09
|
|
116.59
|
|
112.07
|
|
203.62
|
|
223.53
|
|
NASDAQ Market Index
|
100.00
|
|
145.32
|
|
171.50
|
|
170.08
|
|
199.76
|
|
279.90
|
* Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2008, and the reinvestment of dividends.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below is selected consolidated financial data for each of the past five fiscal years. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
FIVE YEAR COMPARISON OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
23
|
|
At or for the years ended December 31
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
||||||||||
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
143,700
|
|
|
$
|
107,487
|
|
|
$
|
88,982
|
|
|
$
|
59,138
|
|
|
$
|
73,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Loss from operations before income taxes
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
(165,704
|
)
|
|
(36,057
|
)
|
|
(61,843
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
375
|
|
|
32,860
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss (including net loss attributable to non-controlling interests)
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
(166,177
|
)
|
|
(35,682
|
)
|
|
(28,983
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
|
1,205
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss attributable to AV Homes stockholders
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
(35,108
|
)
|
|
(28,983
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to AV Homes Stockholders
|
(1.34
|
)
|
|
(7.19
|
)
|
|
(13.33
|
)
|
|
(3.07
|
)
|
|
(3.11
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
144,727
|
|
|
$
|
79,815
|
|
|
$
|
124,316
|
|
|
$
|
115,502
|
|
|
$
|
217,132
|
|
|
Total assets
|
466,728
|
|
|
337,871
|
|
|
409,056
|
|
|
545,451
|
|
|
594,719
|
|
|||||
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt
|
105,402
|
|
|
105,402
|
|
|
105,402
|
|
|
77,057
|
|
|
119,002
|
|
|||||
|
Stockholders' equity (1)
|
286,101
|
|
|
166,172
|
|
|
254,197
|
|
|
418,490
|
|
|
444,101
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Shares outstanding
|
21,986,378
|
|
|
12,827,283
|
|
|
12,942,502
|
|
|
12,900,626
|
|
|
11,355,451
|
|
|||||
|
Stockholders' equity per share
|
$
|
13.01
|
|
|
$
|
12.95
|
|
|
$
|
19.64
|
|
|
$
|
32.44
|
|
|
$
|
39.11
|
|
|
(1)
|
These figures exclude cumulative non-controlling interests, which are classified in consolidated equity in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. These non-controlling interests represent our partners’ equity in LLCs which we consolidate for financial reporting purposes.
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this annual report.
In the preparation of our financial statements, we apply accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The application of GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results. For a description of our accounting policies, please see Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
24
We are engaged in the business of homebuilding, community development, and land sales in Florida, Arizona and the Carolinas. We also engage in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities and the sale for third-party development of commercial and industrial land.
Our primary business is homebuilding, which includes the acquisition, development and building of active adult and conventional home communities in Florida, Arizona, and North Carolina. We believe the demographic trends and lifestyle aspirations of aging Baby Boomers provide us with a favorable environment for future business.
Solivita and Vitalia at Tradition, our active adult communities in Central Florida, and CantaMia in Goodyear, Arizona, serve as our flagship communities as we pursue the active adult segment. In addition, we are adding active adult communities in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina and Mesa, Arizona, which will broaden our geographic footprint and product offering, and should provide us with future participation in the longer term growth of demand from the wave of Baby Boomers entering their retirement years.
We are active in the acquisition of land, construction and sale of primary residences for people of all ages, some of which are located in communities we developed. Our current primary homebuilding sales activities include four primary locations, three in Florida and one in Arizona, with additional communities in the pipeline for both states. The primary residential market has shown recent improvement and we believe continued investment in this segment will provide for a balanced portfolio for the Company. We acquired over 800 lots in five new communities in the second half of 2013 and expect to begin to develop these along with the current building in our existing communities in the Phoenix market. Additionally, we are building out our existing communities in Central Florida, and are expanding into a new market in North Carolina.
Replacement positions may require new acquisitions of developed or undeveloped lots, or we may decide to develop current land holdings, depending on market conditions within the vicinity of these assets.
During 2013, we continued to implement our strategic plan. The primary efforts were focused on the evaluation of potential future investments and the orderly sale of our non-core assets. The search for appropriate sites in our target markets led us to several new and potential future investments. During the year, we invested approximately $55,000 in new land positions. We anticipate further investment activity as we continue to screen sites in new market locations. In addition to the acquisition costs, we plan to commit significant funds toward the development of these assets. In many instances, development costs will exceed the original acquisition costs and a portion of these costs will be expended before we can generate any meaningful sales revenues.
Our business remains capital intensive and requires or may require expenditures for land and infrastructure development, housing construction, funding of operating deficits, real estate taxes, HOA deficits, interest expense and working capital, as well as potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets. We plan to carefully manage our inventory levels through monitoring land development and home starts. In that regard, our planned asset sales will help reduce and diversify land holdings and associated carry costs.
In June 2013, an affiliate of a leading global private investment firm, TPG Aviator, made a $135,000 equity investment in our company. We are using the proceeds, net of transaction costs, to accelerate the implementation of our strategic plan, which includes growth in our core business segments in our existing and new high-potential housing markets. We have significantly increased our land acquisition activities based on this new strategy and continue to identify opportunistic land positions that can contribute to near-term operating profits.
Our business is affected to some extent by the seasonality of home sales which are generally higher during the months of November through April in the geographic areas in which we conduct our business. In addition, our residential community activities, along with other real estate activities such as the sale of commercial and industrial land, are heavily concentrated in the Poinciana, Florida submarket. These factors have a significant impact on our ability to participate in a market recovery. If the real estate market does not continue to stabilize or declines further, it may be necessary to take additional charges against our earnings for inventory impairments or write-downs of our investments in unconsolidated entities and other assets.
We continue our ongoing efforts to improve our operating efficiencies by identifying areas of our business where we can reduce our expenses. As part of this process, we will continue to examine our assets to determine which assets fit within our core business strategy. These evaluations may also result in additional cash and non-cash charges or write-downs.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In the preparation of our financial statements we apply GAAP. The application of GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results. Our
25
significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. Certain of these policies involve significant judgments, assumptions and estimates by management that may have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and revenue and costs. We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and political factors and changes in our business environment; therefore, actual results could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are revised when circumstances warrant. Such changes in estimates and refinements in methodologies are reflected in our reported results of operations and, if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The judgments, assumptions and estimates we use and believe to be critical to our business are based on historical experience, knowledge of the accounts, industry practices, and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions we have made, actual results may differ from these judgments and estimates and could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of our operations.
The accounting policies that we deem most critical to us and involve the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments are as follows:
Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories are stated at cost unless the asset is determined to be impaired, in which case the asset is written to its fair value. Land and Other Inventories include expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated indirect costs. Land and Other Inventories owned and constructed by us also include interest cost and real estate taxes capitalized until development and construction are substantially completed. For those communities for which construction and development activities have been idled, applicable interest and real estate taxes are expensed as incurred. Land and development costs, construction and direct and allocated indirect costs are assigned to components of Land and Other Inventories based on specific identification, relative sales value, or area allocation methods.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment
(“ASC 360-10”), we review our Land and Other Inventories for indicators of impairment.
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. The discount rate used in the determination of fair value would vary, depending on the state of development. Assumptions and estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on expectations of future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below. Changes to these assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows, which could affect the potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation process, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis to reflect market conditions, including a significant oversupply of homes available for sale, higher foreclosure activity and significant competition. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $33, $1,635, and $1,527 respectively, which related to homes completed or under construction, and $677, $49,749, and $107,981 respectively, in impairment charges related to land developed and/or held for future development or sale.
As of December 31, 2013, other than the Land and Other Inventories that we determined to be impaired and accordingly were written down to fair value, and excluding homes completed or under construction, we had no other Land and Other Inventories that had estimated undiscounted cash flows that were less than their carrying values. However, we can give no assurance that any future evaluations will not result in further impairments given the real estate market, the likelihood of increased competition within the age restricted segment as conditions improve, and other factors as more fully described below.
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include our: (i) housing communities (active adult and primary residential, including scattered lots) and (ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. A discussion of the factors that impact our impairment assessment for these categories follows.
26
Housing communities:
Homebuilding activities include the development of active adult and primary residential communities and the operation of amenities. The operating results generated from active adult and primary residential communities during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 include operating expenses relating to the operation of the amenities in our communities as well as divisional overhead allocated among several communities.
Our active adult and primary residential communities are generally large master-planned communities in Florida, Arizona, and North Carolina. Several of these communities are long-term projects on land we have owned for many years. In reviewing each of our communities, we determine if potential impairment indicators exist by reviewing various factors such as actual margins on homes closed in recent months, projected margins on homes in backlog, projected margins on speculative homes, average selling prices, sales activities and local market conditions. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated cost of home construction, estimated land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas in which we build and sell homes, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. The build-out of our active adult residential communities generally exceeds five years. Our assumptions are based on current activity and recent trends at our active adult and primary residential communities. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial number of variables related to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Land developed and/or held for future development or sale:
Our land developed and/or held for future development or sale represents land holdings for the potential development of future active adult and/or primary residential communities, commercial and industrial uses. For land developed and/or held for future development or sale, indicators of potential impairment include changes in use, changes in local market conditions, declines in the selling prices of similar assets and increases in costs. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows could be significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated costs of home construction, estimated land and land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows could also be impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas where we own land for future development, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. Factors that we consider in determining the appropriateness of moving forward with land development or whether to write-off the related amounts capitalized include: our current inventory levels, local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources and the estimated future net cash flows to be generated from the project.
Assets Held for Sale
We account for Assets Held for Sale in accordance with ASC 360
Property, Plant, and Equipment.
In order for an asset to be classified as held for sale, it must meet the following criteria:
|
•
|
Management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset;
|
|
•
|
The asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets;
|
|
•
|
An active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset (disposal group) have been initiated;
|
|
•
|
The sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year;
|
|
•
|
The asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and
|
|
•
|
Actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
|
We continue to execute a portfolio rationalization plan whereby we opportunistically sell non-core commercial and industrial assets, as well as scattered lot positions and land assets that are in excess of our needed supply in a given market. Under this plan, assets that meet the criteria above are classified as held for sale. During 2013, we changed our plans to sell certain assets, resulting in the reclassification of approximately $13,800 of assets to Land and Other Inventories and a reversal of previously recorded impairment expense of $958. Additionally, approximately $4,100 of assets held for sale were sold and approximately $16,100 of assets were added to held for sale during 2013.
27
For assets held for sale (such as homes completed or under construction or vacant land parcels available for sale), we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value (estimated sales price) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less cost to sell is less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell.
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues
Homebuilding cost of revenues includes the specific construction costs of each home and all applicable land acquisition, land development and related costs, both incurred and estimated to be incurred, warranty costs, capitalized interest costs, and closing costs. The construction cost of the home includes amounts paid through the closing date of the home, plus an appropriate accrual for costs incurred but not yet paid, based on an analysis of budgeted construction costs. This accrual is reviewed for accuracy based on actual payments made after closing compared with the amount accrued, and adjustments are made if needed. Total community land acquisition and development costs are based on an analysis of budgeted costs compared with actual costs incurred to date and estimates to complete. The development cycles for our communities range from under one year to in excess of ten years for certain master planned communities. Adjustments to estimated total land acquisition and development costs for the community affects the costs of the community’s remaining lots.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740
Income Taxes.
The provision for, or benefit from, income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. In assessing the ability to realize the value of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. Deferred tax assets are evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if adjustments to the valuation allowance are required. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.
In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required. We evaluate our uncertain tax positions quarterly based on various factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, tax laws or the status of audits by tax authorities. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations or financial position. As of December 31, 2013, our deferred tax asset and valuation allowance was $130,232.
Warranty Costs
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience is a strong indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and the cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liability for each geographic market in which we operate and adjust the amounts as necessary. Actual warranty costs in the future could differ from our estimates. Warranty reserves are included in Accrued and Other Liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the preparation of our financial statements, we apply GAAP. The application of GAAP may require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results.
The following table provides a comparison of certain financial data related to our operations:
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Active adult communities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
28
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Homebuilding
|
|
$
|
69,362
|
|
|
$
|
36,018
|
|
|
$
|
28,548
|
|
|
Amenity
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
7,014
|
|
|
11,386
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Homebuilding (1)
|
|
58,051
|
|
|
32,937
|
|
|
25,310
|
|
|||
|
Homebuilding selling, general and administrative
|
|
10,097
|
|
|
11,832
|
|
|
14,788
|
|
|||
|
Amenity
|
|
8,013
|
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
12,024
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
(8,919
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Primary residential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Homebuilding
|
|
$
|
45,611
|
|
|
$
|
33,496
|
|
|
$
|
12,920
|
|
|
Amenity
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Homebuilding (2)
|
|
38,752
|
|
|
29,397
|
|
|
15,997
|
|
|||
|
Homebuilding selling, general and administrative
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
|||
|
Amenity
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net operating loss
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
16,303
|
|
|
$
|
26,595
|
|
|
$
|
31,731
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
8,111
|
|
|
18,581
|
|
|
28,099
|
|
|||
|
Net operating income
|
|
$
|
8,192
|
|
|
$
|
8,014
|
|
|
$
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Other operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
932
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
546
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
773
|
|
|||
|
Net operating income
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11,039
|
|
|
$
|
(283
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Unallocated income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
2,148
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
Loss on repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|||
|
Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
259
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
(15,975
|
)
|
|
(16,148
|
)
|
|
(17,502
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
(9,516
|
)
|
|||
|
Other real estate expenses, net
|
|
(2,834
|
)
|
|
(5,113
|
)
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(17,215
|
)
|
|||
|
Impairment of land developed or held for future development
|
|
281
|
|
|
(57,408
|
)
|
|
(107,981
|
)
|
|||
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,704
|
)
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|||
|
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
(1,205
|
)
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
|
296
|
|
|||
|
Net loss attributable to AV Homes
|
|
$
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,881
|
)
|
29
|
(1)
|
Includes impairment charges for inventory of approximately $32, $1,620, and $1,060 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes impairment charges for inventory of approximately $1, $15, and $467 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
Data from closings for the active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
is summarized as follows:
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
Number of
Units |
|
Revenues
|
|
Average Price
Per Unit
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Active adult communities
|
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
69,103
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
|
200
|
|
|
45,349
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
114,452
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active adult communities
|
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
36,012
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
|
158
|
|
|
33,460
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
69,472
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active adult communities
|
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
28,537
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
|
53
|
|
|
12,808
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
41,345
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
Data from contracts signed for the active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
is summarized as follows:
|
Years ended December 31,
|
Gross Number
of Contracts
Signed
|
|
Cancellations |
|
Contracts
Signed, Net of Cancellations |
|
Dollar Value
|
|
Average
Price Per Unit |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Active adult communities
|
398
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
81,712
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
192
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
118
|
|
|
28,654
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
|
Total
|
590
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
110,366
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active adult communities
|
221
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
40,522
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
275
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
227
|
|
|
50,481
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
|
Total
|
496
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
91,003
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active adult communities
|
178
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
32,935
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
109
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
91
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
|
Total
|
287
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
51,476
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
30
Backlog for the active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments as of December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
is summarized as follows:
|
As of December 31,
|
Number of
Units |
|
Dollar
Volume |
|
Average Price
Per Unit |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Active adult communities
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
29,362
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
40
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
Total
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
39,862
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active adult communities
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
16,158
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
122
|
|
|
26,906
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
|
Total
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
43,064
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active adult communities
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
11,691
|
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
53
|
|
|
9,849
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
Total
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
21,540
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
The number of net housing contracts signed during the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the same period in
2012
, increased 18%. The dollar value of housing contracts signed in
2013
increased 24% as a result of increased sales volume coupled with higher average sales prices in both of our operating segments. During the year ended December 31,
2013
, cancellations of previously signed contracts totaled 127 compared to 103 during the year ended December 31,
2012
. As a percentage of the gross number of contracts signed, this represents 22% and 21%, respectively.
As of December 31,
2013
, our inventory of unsold (speculative) homes, both completed and under construction, was 60 units compared to 62 units as of December 31,
2012
. As of December 31,
2013
, approximately 22% of unsold homes were completed compared to approximately 34% as of December 31,
2012
.
During the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2012
, the number of homes closed increased by 57%, and the related revenues increased by 65%. Our average sales price for homes closed during the year ended December 31,
2013
, increased to $238 compared to $227 for the year ended December 31,
2012
, primarily due to a change in mix of homes closed between operating segments. We anticipate that we will close approximately 80% of the homes in backlog as of December 31,
2013
, during the subsequent 12-month period, subject to cancellations by purchasers prior to scheduled delivery dates. During the year ended December 31,
2012
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2011
, the number of homes closed increased by 76% and the related revenues increased by 68%.
In general, prices of homes sold during
2013
ranged from approximately $157 to approximately $524 in our primary residential operations. For our active adult operations, prices ranged from approximately $137 to approximately $446 on homes sold during
2013
. Closings on to-be-built homes generally occur within 110 to 220 days from sale, and closings on speculative homes generally occur within 30 to 60 days from sale.
Fiscal Year
2013
Compared to Fiscal Year
2012
The net loss attributable to AV Homes for the year ended December 31,
2013
, was $9,477 or ($1.34) per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss of $90,235 or ($7.19) per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31,
2012
. The decrease in net loss for the year ended December 31,
2013
was primarily due to significantly decreased land impairment charges, increased income from our primary residential and active adult homebuilding segments, and increased income from our commercial and industrial and other land sales.
31
Revenues from active adult communities increased $33,557 or 78% for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the same period in
2012
. The increase in revenues for fiscal year
2013
is primarily attributable to increased closings from Solivita and CantaMia and a change in mix of homes closed. The average sales price on closings from active adult homebuilding operations during
2013
was $246 compared to $243 during
2012
.
Expenses from active adult operations increased $24,210 for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the same period in
2012
. The increase in expenses is primarily due to increased closings, offset in part by the achievement of improved margins in 2013. The contribution margin (gross margin less commissions and excluding impairment charges) on closings from active adult homebuilding operations during
2013
improved to 16% from 13% in
2012
. The increase in contribution margins is generally attributable to a change in mix of homes closed and improved margins from Solivita and CantaMia. During
2012
, we re-engineered the current housing product at Solivita to make the homes more cost efficient. The result of this, coupled with increases in the average closing price per unit, generated higher operating margins at Solivita in
2013
than in
2012
. Included in the results from active adult operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations. During
2013
, we recorded impairment charges in our active adult operations of $32 compared to $1,620 in
2012
from homes completed or under construction.
Revenues from primary residential operations increased $12,126 or 34% for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the same period in
2012
. The increase in revenues is primarily due to a 27% increase in unit closings and an increase in the average price per unit closed in
2013
as compared to
2012
. The average sales price on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for
2013
was $227 compared to $212 for
2012
.
Expenses from primary residential operations increased $9,680 or 27% for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the same period in
2012
. The increase in expenses is attributable to increased closings in
2013
as compared to
2012
, offset in part by improved margins. The average contribution margin (excluding impairments) on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for
2013
increased to 15% from 12% for
2012
. The increase in contribution margin is primarily due to our ability to increase the average selling price in both our Arizona and Florida operations in 2013 as compared to 2012. Included in the results from primary residential operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations.
The amount and types of commercial and industrial and other non-core residential land sold vary from year to year depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and the timing of the closings of these sales. Revenues from commercial and industrial and other land sales decreased $10,292 for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2012
. During the year ended December 31,
2013
, we realized pre-tax profits of $8,192 on revenues of $16,303 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. During the year ended December 31,
2012
, we realized pre-tax profits of $8,014 on revenues of $26,595 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. The increase in profit is attributable to a lower basis in the land sold in
2013
versus
2012
.
Revenues from other operations decreased $70 or 12% for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2012
due to reduced leasing activities in 2013. Expenses from other operations increased $579 for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2012
primarily due to a full year of expenses associated with a property in 2013 versus one quarter in 2012.
General and administrative expenses decreased $173 or 1.1% for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2012
. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses were 11% and 12% for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decreased expense for
2013
as compared to
2012
, despite a large increase in homebuilding operations, was primarily due to net payroll reductions and reduced office rent and office-related expenses related to our restructuring activities.
Interest expense decreased $5,143 or 65% in
2013
as compared to
2012
. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to the increase in the amount of capitalized interest due to the increased land development during
2013
.
Other real estate expenses, net, represented by real estate taxes, property maintenance and miscellaneous income not allocable to specific operations, decreased by $2,279 or 45% for the year ended December 31,
2013
, compared to the year ended December 31,
2012
. The decrease in other real estate expenses for
2013
was primarily attributable to the following 2012 expenses which did not recur in 2013: a loss from the sale of consolidated joint venture property of $1,000, write-off of fixed assets of $746, and a loss on restructuring of a note receivable of $532.
Income tax expense was provided for at an effective tax rate of 0.0% for the years ended December 31,
2013
and 2012. In accordance with ASC 740
Income Taxes
("ASC 740"), we evaluated our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if
32
valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During the year ended December 31,
2013
, we recognized an increase of $3,699 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31,
2013
, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $130,232. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized. Reference is made to the Income Taxes note (Note 10) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II.
Fiscal Year 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year 2011
The net loss attributable to AV Homes for the year ended December 31, 2012, was $90,235 or ($7.19) per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss of $165,881 or ($13.33) per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, was primarily due to significantly decreased land impairment charges, decreased losses from our two homebuilding segments, and increased income from our commercial and industrial and other land sales segment.
Revenues from active adult communities increased $3,098 or 7.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. Expenses from active adult operations decreased $171 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. The increase in revenues for fiscal year 2012 is primarily attributable to increased closings from Solivita and CantaMia and a change in mix of homes closed. Expenses were relatively flat primarily due to increased closings, and a change in the mix of homes closed, offset in part by reduced expenses from amenities due to the outsourcing of operations at Solivita. During 2012, we recorded impairment charges in our active adult operations of $1,620 compared to $1,060 in 2011 from homes completed or under construction. The average sales price on closings from active adult homebuilding operations during 2012 was $243 compared to $236 during 2011.
The average contribution margin (excluding impairment charges) on closings from active adult homebuilding operations during 2012 was approximately 13% compared to approximately 11% during 2011. The increase in average contribution margins is generally attributable to a change in mix of homes closed and improved margins from Solivita, offset in part by deterioration in margins from CantaMia and decreased closings from Tradition (which generated higher than average margins). During 2011, we re-engineered the current housing product at Solivita to make the homes more cost efficient. The result of this, coupled with increases in the average closing price per unit, generated higher operating margins at Solivita in 2012 than in 2011. Included in the results from active adult operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations.
Revenues from primary residential operations increased $20,664 or 135.3% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. Expenses from primary residential operations increased $13,146 or 57.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. The increase in revenues is primarily due to a 198% increase in unit closings, offset in part by a reduction in the average price per unit closed in 2012 as compared to 2011. The reduction in average price per unit is due to an increase of entry level homes in our mix of homes closed in 2012. The increase in expenses is attributable to increased closings and a change in mix of homes closed in 2012 as compared to 2011, offset in part by decreased impairment charges.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded impairment charges in our primary residential operations of approximately $15 compared to approximately $467 for the year ended December 31, 2011, from homes completed or under construction. The average sales price on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for 2012 was $212 compared to $242 for 2011.
The average contribution margin (excluding impairments) on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for 2012 was approximately 12% compared to approximately 1% for 2011. The increase in average contribution margin is primarily due to our Phoenix primary homebuilding operations generating higher margins in 2012 versus 2011, offset in part by a change in mix of homes sold in our Florida communities, which were weighted towards entry-level homes. During 2012, our Phoenix operations generated an increased average closing price per unit with lower land and housing construction costs per unit as compared to 2011, due to a favorable change in the mix of homes closed and our ability to increase sales prices in excess of the cost increases realized. In Florida, we closed speculative inventory in 2011 in close-out communities which had a low cost basis, and in 2012 we had our first closings of new product in new communities that generated lower profit margins. Included in the results from primary residential operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations.
33
The amount and types of commercial and industrial and other non-core residential land sold vary from year to year depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and the timing of the closings of these sales. Revenues from commercial and industrial and other land sales decreased $5,136 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we realized pre-tax profits of $8,014 on revenues of $26,595 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we realized pre-tax profits of $3,632 on revenues of $31,731 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. Expenses from commercial, industrial and other land sales decreased $9,518 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in expenses is attributable to a lower basis in the land sold in 2012 versus 2011.
Revenues from other operations decreased $334 or 35.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. Expenses from other operations decreased $805 or 104.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in revenues and expenses are primarily attributable to the sale of our title operations in July of 2011 and reduced leasing activities in 2012 as compared to 2011.
General and administrative expenses decreased $1,354 or 7.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The decreased expense for 2012 as compared to 2011 was primarily due to net changes in payroll expenses related to our restructuring efforts, which resulted in reduced headcount, and reduced office rent and office related expenses.
Interest expense decreased $1,543 or 16.2% in 2012 as compared to 2011. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to a decreased level of indebtedness during 2012 as compared to 2011.
Other real estate expenses, net, represented by real estate taxes, property maintenance and miscellaneous income not allocable to specific operations, increased by $3,459 or 209.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in other real estate expenses for 2012 was primarily attributable to $758 increase in Poinciana Parkway expenditures, loss from the sale of consolidated joint venture property of $1,000, write off of fixed assets of $746, a loss on restructuring of a note receivable of $532 and other, offset in part by a decrease in our carrying costs associated with our non-core assets. Also contributing to the variance from 2011 were gains recognized in the year ended December 31, 2011 related to sales of impact fees and the sale of a utility easement, and a gain recognized from an adjustment made to the estimated development liability of $860.
Income tax expense was provided for at an effective tax rate of 0.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 0.3% income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2011. In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluated our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized an increase of $35,050 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2012, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $126,533. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized. Reference is made to the Income Taxes note (Note 10) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary business activities are capital intensive in nature. Significant capital resources are required to finance planned active adult and primary residential communities, homebuilding construction in process, community infrastructure, selling expenses, new projects and working capital needs, including funding of debt service requirements, operating deficits and the carrying costs of land.
Cash Flows
As of December 31,
2013
, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $144,727 compared to $79,815 as of December 31,
2012
. As of December 31,
2013
and 2012, total consolidated indebtedness was $105,402. Additionally, as of December 31,
2013
, we had $3,956 in restricted cash, of which $3,622 is held to collateralize outstanding letters of credit, as compared to $4,682 in restricted cash as of December 31,
2012
.
34
Our operating cash flows fluctuate relative to the status of development within existing communities, expenditures for land, new developments and other real estate activities, and sales of various homebuilding product lines within those communities and other developments and to fund operating deficits.
For the year ended December 31,
2013
, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $62,437, primarily to purchase land for the expansion of our primary residential segment. Net cash used by investing activities amounted to $1,134 due to the purchase of property and equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities of $128,483 was primarily attributable to the TPG Aviator equity investment.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $48,313, primarily to fund our operating losses and to purchase land for the expansion of our active adult segment. Net cash used by investing activities amounted to $4,387 due to the purchase of property and equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities of $8,199 was attributable to contributions from a joint venture partner to acquire land, offset in part by payments of withholding taxes related to restricted stock, a distribution to a joint venture partner from the sale of the assets of the joint venture, and debt issuance costs associated with our 7.50% Exchange Notes.
Performance Bonds
Performance bonds, issued by third party entities, are used primarily to guarantee our performance to construct improvements in our various communities. As of December 31,
2013
, we had outstanding performance bonds of approximately $11,185. We do not believe that it is likely any of these outstanding performance bonds will be drawn upon.
Other
As of December 31, 2013, we have the authorization from the board of directors to repurchase stock or 4.5% Notes in an amount up to $18,304.
Assuming that no additional significant adverse changes in our business occur, we anticipate the aggregate cash on hand, cash flow generated through homebuilding and related operations, and sales of commercial and industrial and other land will provide sufficient liquidity to fund our business for 2014.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
When we are either deemed to hold the controlling interest in a voting interest entity or deemed to be the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) we are required to consolidate the investment. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb the majority of losses of the VIE or the right to receive the majority of benefits from the VIE. Investments where we don't hold the controlling interest and we are not the primary beneficiary are accounted for under the equity method.
Our variable interests may be in the form of
(1)
equity ownership,
(2)
contracts to purchase assets and/or
(3)
loans provided by us to the investor. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, level of economic disproportionality between us and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 58.2% for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest or be the primary beneficiary. These entities, along with other arrangements, may represent variable interests, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We determine the method for accounting for our investments at inception or upon a reconsideration event.
We share in the profits and losses of the unconsolidated entities generally in accordance with our ownership interests. We and our equity partners make initial and ongoing capital contributions to these unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make capital contributions is governed by each unconsolidated entity’s respective operating agreement.
During 2009 and 2008, we entered into various transactions with unaffiliated third parties providing for the formation of LLCs, and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly-formed LLCs. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. We made contributions totaling $111 and $135 to these unconsolidated entities in
2013
and
2012
, respectively.
35
As of December 31,
2013
, these unconsolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or our equity partners.
Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects contractual obligations as of December 31,
2013
:
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligations (1)
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1
Year |
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
|
More than
5 Years |
||||||||||
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations (2)
|
|
$
|
105,402
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
|
Interest Obligations on Long-Term Debt
|
|
18,429
|
|
|
7,743
|
|
|
8,924
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|||||
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
2,397
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
103
|
|
|||||
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
378
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase Obligations - Residential Development
|
|
17,620
|
|
|
17,620
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Compensation Obligations
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet under GAAP
|
|
37,839
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
33,252
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
|
$
|
182,315
|
|
|
$
|
26,740
|
|
|
$
|
112,374
|
|
|
$
|
3,168
|
|
|
$
|
40,033
|
|
(1) Excluded from this table are future costs related to the Poinciana Parkway since the timing and amount of future costs cannot be estimated at this time.
(2) Long-term debt obligations represent:
(i) $55,500 outstanding under the 7.50% Notes (see Note 5 in Item 8) due February 15, 2016; however, holders had the right to require us to repurchase the 7.50% Notes on February 15, 2014 (notes in the amount of $19 were put and repurchased in February 2014), and holders are able to require us to repurchase the 7.50% Notes upon the occurrence of a breach of any of the financial covenants, a “fundamental change” as defined in the note indenture, or an event of default, as described in the note indenture,
(ii)
$44,500 outstanding under the 7.50% Exchange Notes due February 15, 2016, and
(iii)
$5,402 outstanding under the 4.50% Notes due April 1, 2024; however, holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019, or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for those Notes.
Purchase obligations-residential development represent purchase commitments for land development and construction expenditures, substantially for homebuilding operations that relate to contracts for services, materials and supplies, which obligations generally relate to corresponding contracts for sales of homes. Compensation obligations represent compensation to a former executive pursuant to employment contracts.
Other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet under GAAP represent the estimated cost-to-complete of certain utilities improvements in areas within Poinciana, Florida and Rio Rico, Arizona where home sites have been sold and certain development obligations associated with CantaMia.
Effects of Inflation and Economic Conditions
We may be adversely affected during periods of inflation because of higher land and construction costs. Inflation may also increase our financing costs. In addition, higher mortgage interest rates affect the affordability of our products to prospective homebuyers. While we attempt to pass on to our customers increases in our costs through increased sales prices,
36
market forces may limit our ability to do so. If we are unable to raise sales prices enough to compensate for higher costs, or if mortgage interest rates increase significantly, our revenues, gross margins, and net income could be adversely affected.
Various housing indices have shown significant improvement in recent periods. New home sales experienced volatility in the second half of 2013 period as consumers adjusted to higher home prices and an increase in mortgage interest rates. While we believe that higher interest rates are inevitable and may have a moderating effect on demand and pricing, we believe this impact will be outweighed by the other factors driving increased sales activity as overall new home sales remain low compared with historical levels. We believe that any sustained rise in interest rates will be indicative of a stronger macroeconomic environment that will support a continued recovery in the homebuilding industry.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements discussed in Item 1 (“Business”), Item 3 (“Legal Proceedings”), Item 7 (“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”), and elsewhere in this Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: the stability of certain financial markets; disruption of the credit markets and reduced availability and more stringent financing requirements for commercial and residential mortgages of all types; the number of investor and speculator resale homes for sale and homes in foreclosure in our communities and in the geographic areas in which we develop and sell homes; the increased level of unemployment; the decline in net worth and/or of income of potential buyers; the decline in consumer confidence; the failure to successfully implement our business strategy; shifts in demographic trends affecting demand for active adult and primary housing; the level of immigration and migration into the areas in which we conduct real estate activities; our access to financing; construction defect and home warranty claims; changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, government regulations; the failure to successfully integrate acquisitions into our business, and other factors as are described in Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) of this Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained herein, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof.
ITEM 7A . QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates and the cyclical nature of the real estate industry. A majority of the purchasers of our homes finance their purchases through third-party lenders providing mortgage financing or, to some extent, rely upon investment income. In general, housing demand is dependent on home equity, consumer savings, employment and income levels and third-party financing and is adversely affected by increases in interest rates, unavailability of mortgage financing, increasing housing costs and unemployment levels. The amount or value of discretionary income and savings, including retirement assets, available to home purchasers can be affected by a decline in the capital markets. Fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect our real estate results of operations and liquidity because of the negative impact on the housing industry. Real estate developers are subject to various risks, many of which are outside their control, including real estate market conditions (both where our communities and homebuilding operations are located and in areas where our potential customers reside), changing demographic conditions, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires, delays in construction schedules, cost overruns, changes in government regulations or requirements, increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees, availability and cost of land, materials and labor, and access to financing. See Notes 5 and 14 (”Notes Payable” and “Fair Value Disclosures”) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion of risks.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
37
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AV Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on the framework in
“Internal Control-Integrated Framework”
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework). Based on that assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2013
.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of AV Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in this annual report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The attestation report follows this report.
38
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AV Homes, Inc.
We have audited AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 of AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated March 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 17, 2014
39
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AV Homes, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AV Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), AV Homes, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework)
and our report dated March 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 17, 2014
40
AV HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
144,727
|
|
|
$
|
79,815
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
3,956
|
|
|
4,682
|
|
||
|
Land and other inventories
|
240,078
|
|
|
171,044
|
|
||
|
Receivables, net
|
3,893
|
|
|
6,730
|
|
||
|
Income tax receivable
|
—
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
37,844
|
|
|
36,661
|
|
||
|
Investments in unconsolidated entities
|
1,230
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
11,138
|
|
|
10,777
|
|
||
|
Assets held for sale
|
23,862
|
|
|
25,649
|
|
||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
466,728
|
|
|
$
|
337,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
9,757
|
|
|
$
|
4,656
|
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
14,280
|
|
|
12,978
|
|
||
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenues
|
2,323
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
||
|
Estimated development liability for sold land
|
33,232
|
|
|
32,974
|
|
||
|
Notes payable
|
105,402
|
|
|
105,402
|
|
||
|
Total Liabilities
|
164,994
|
|
|
157,995
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Contingent convertible cumulative redeemable preferred stock
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Common Stock, par value $1 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Authorized: 50,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Issued: 22,097,252 shares at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
||||
|
12,938,157 shares at December 31, 2012
|
22,097
|
|
|
12,938
|
|
||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
394,504
|
|
|
262,363
|
|
||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(127,481
|
)
|
|
(106,110
|
)
|
||
|
|
289,120
|
|
|
169,191
|
|
||
|
Treasury stock: at cost, 110,874 shares at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012
|
(3,019
|
)
|
|
(3,019
|
)
|
||
|
Total AV Homes stockholders’ equity
|
286,101
|
|
|
166,172
|
|
||
|
Non-controlling interests
|
15,633
|
|
|
13,704
|
|
||
|
Total Equity
|
301,734
|
|
|
179,876
|
|
||
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
$
|
466,728
|
|
|
$
|
337,871
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
AV HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Real estate revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Homebuilding
|
$
|
124,651
|
|
|
$
|
78,968
|
|
|
$
|
55,206
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
16,303
|
|
|
26,595
|
|
|
31,731
|
|
|||
|
Other real estate
|
528
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
646
|
|
|||
|
Total real estate revenues
|
141,482
|
|
|
106,161
|
|
|
87,583
|
|
|||
|
Interest income
|
2,148
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
309
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
70
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|||
|
Total revenues
|
143,700
|
|
|
107,487
|
|
|
88,982
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Real estate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Homebuilding
|
121,753
|
|
|
86,261
|
|
|
70,170
|
|
|||
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
8,111
|
|
|
18,581
|
|
|
28,099
|
|
|||
|
Other real estate
|
3,450
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|||
|
Total real estate expenses
|
133,314
|
|
|
111,121
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|||
|
Impairment charges (reversal of impairment charges)
|
(248
|
)
|
|
59,043
|
|
|
129,947
|
|
|||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
211
|
|
|||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
15,975
|
|
|
16,148
|
|
|
17,502
|
|
|||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,388
|
)
|
|||
|
Interest expense
|
2,830
|
|
|
7,973
|
|
|
9,516
|
|
|||
|
Total expenses
|
151,871
|
|
|
195,429
|
|
|
254,288
|
|
|||
|
Loss from unconsolidated entities
|
(101
|
)
|
|
259
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|||
|
Loss before income taxes
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
(165,704
|
)
|
|||
|
Income tax (expense)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|||
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
(166,177
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities
|
1,205
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|||
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to AV Homes stockholders
|
$
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Reconciliation of net loss to loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of convertible preferred stock (see Note 1 for additional information)
|
(11,894
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Loss attributable to AV Homes common stockholders
|
$
|
(21,371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share attributable to AV Homes common stockholders
|
$
|
(1.34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.33
|
)
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
AV HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AV Homes
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
Controlling
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Equity
|
|
Interest
|
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
15,562,732
|
|
|
$
|
15,563
|
|
|
$
|
305,672
|
|
|
$
|
176,265
|
|
|
(2,662,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,490
|
|
|
$
|
444
|
|
|
$
|
418,934
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
4,935
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54
|
|
|||||||
|
Issuances of restricted stock units and stock units
|
365,500
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock
|
(293,178
|
)
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
(3,819
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,112
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,112
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Stock repurchases
|
(35,381
|
)
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|||||||
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
(1,409,832
|
)
|
|
(1,410
|
)
|
|
(24,264
|
)
|
|
(7,411
|
)
|
|
1,409,832
|
|
|
33,086
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||||||
|
Contributions from non controlling interests
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
301
|
|
|||||||
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
(166,177
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
14,194,776
|
|
|
14,195
|
|
|
282,953
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
(1,252,274
|
)
|
|
(45,924
|
)
|
|
254,197
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
254,646
|
|
|||||||
|
Issuance of common stock
|
22,834
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
200
|
|
|||||||
|
Issuances of restricted stock units and stock units
|
424,520
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock
|
(501,084
|
)
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
(2,802
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,303
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,303
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Stock repurchases
|
(61,489
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(759
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,834
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,834
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,834
|
|
|||||||
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
(1,141,400
|
)
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
(22,919
|
)
|
|
(18,848
|
)
|
|
1,141,400
|
|
|
42,905
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Contributions from non controlling interests
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,703
|
|
|
10,703
|
|
|||||||
|
Net (loss) income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
12,938,157
|
|
|
12,938
|
|
|
262,363
|
|
|
(106,110
|
)
|
|
(110,874)
|
|
|
(3,019
|
)
|
|
166,172
|
|
|
13,704
|
|
|
179,876
|
|
|||||||
|
Issuance of common stock
|
9,215,017
|
|
|
9,215
|
|
|
118,619
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
127,834
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
127,834
|
|
|||||||
|
Issuances of restricted stock units and stock units
|
96,372
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock
|
(147,833
|
)
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
148
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Stock repurchases
|
(4,461
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|||||||
|
Beneficial conversion feature
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11,894
|
|
|
(11,894
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Contributions from non controlling interests
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
724
|
|
|||||||
|
Net (loss) income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2013
|
22,097,252
|
|
|
$
|
22,097
|
|
|
$
|
394,504
|
|
|
$
|
(127,481
|
)
|
|
(110,874
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,019
|
)
|
|
$
|
286,101
|
|
|
$
|
15,633
|
|
|
$
|
301,734
|
|
There are
10,000,000
authorized shares of
$0.10
par value preferred stock,
none
of which are issued as of December 31, 2013, see Note 1 for additional information.
43
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
AV HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net loss (including net gain or loss attributable to non-controlling interests)
|
$
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
(166,177
|
)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,804
|
|
|
4,405
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
1,648
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17,215
|
|
||||
|
Impairment of land and other inventories
|
(248
|
)
|
|
59,043
|
|
|
112,732
|
|
|||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
211
|
|
|||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,388
|
)
|
|||
|
Gain from write-off of 5.50% term bonds
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|||
|
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities
|
101
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
398
|
|
|||
|
Loss from disposal of assets
|
36
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Distributions of earnings from an unconsolidated entity
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
357
|
|
|||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
726
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
550
|
|
|||
|
Receivables, net
|
2,837
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|||
|
Income tax receivable
|
1,293
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
473
|
|
|||
|
Land and other inventories
|
(68,787
|
)
|
|
(40,576
|
)
|
|
11,230
|
|
|||
|
Assets held for sale
|
(1,213
|
)
|
|
4,429
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(361
|
)
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
4,426
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable, estimated development liability, and accrued and other liabilities
|
6,661
|
|
|
3,243
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|||
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenues
|
338
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|||
|
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
(62,437
|
)
|
|
(48,313
|
)
|
|
(17,357
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Investment in property and equipment
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
(4,421
|
)
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Return from Poinciana Parkway
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
|||
|
Notes receivable from unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|||
|
Return of capital from unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
458
|
|
|||
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities
|
(111
|
)
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|||
|
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
(4,387
|
)
|
|
3,173
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of 7.5% Convertible Notes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|||
|
Repurchase of 4.5% Convertible Notes
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(59,402
|
)
|
|||
|
Principal payments of real estate borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12,501
|
)
|
|||
|
Issuance of common shares
|
35,805
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Issuance of preferred shares
|
92,030
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
|
(4,627
|
)
|
|||
|
Contributions from consolidated joint venture partner
|
731
|
|
|
13,779
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Distributions to consolidated joint venture partner
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(3,076
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
45
|
Payment of withholding taxes related to restricted stock and units withheld
|
(76
|
)
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|||
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
128,483
|
|
|
8,199
|
|
|
23,209
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
64,912
|
|
|
(44,501
|
)
|
|
9,025
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
79,815
|
|
|
124,316
|
|
|
115,502
|
|
|||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
$
|
144,727
|
|
|
$
|
79,815
|
|
|
$
|
124,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Transfer from assets held for sale to land and other inventories and property and equipment
|
$
|
13,767
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature (deemed dividend)
|
$
|
11,894
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Common stock issued for conversion of preferred stock
|
$
|
92,030
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
AV HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Note 1 -
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AV Homes, Inc. and all subsidiaries, partnerships and other entities in which AV Homes, Inc. (“AV Homes," “we,” “us,” “our,” or “the Company”) has a controlling interest. Our investments in unconsolidated entities in which we have less than a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
TPG Investment in Company
On June 19, 2013, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") by and among AV Homes and TPG Aviator, L.P. ("TPG Aviator") pursuant to which TPG Aviator agreed to acquire
2,557,474
shares of AV Homes’ common stock, par value
$1.00
per share (the “Common Stock"), at a purchase price of
$14.65
per share, and
665,754
shares of a newly authorized series of AV Homes’ preferred stock, designated as Series A Contingent Convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value
$0.10
per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock"), at a purchase price and liquidation preference of
$146.50
per share, for an aggregate investment in AV Homes by TPG Aviator of
$135,000
.
On June 20, 2013, AV Homes and TPG Aviator closed the transactions (the “TPG Investment") contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and AV Homes issued to TPG Aviator the Common Stock and the Series A Preferred Stock in the amounts and in exchange for the purchase price described above.
On September 18, 2013, we held a special meeting of stockholders at which our stockholders: (1) approved the right to convert, at the option of the Company or the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series A Preferred Stock into
6,657,543
shares of our Common Stock and (2) approved TPG Aviator's pre-emptive rights following the approval of such conversion to participate in future issuances of our Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for our Common Stock. Following the meeting of stockholders, we provided notice to TPG Aviator of our intention to convert the Series A Preferred Stock as of September 18, 2013. The Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock was issued on September 19, 2013 and the Series A Preferred Stock was cancelled.
In accordance with GAAP, before its conversion, the Series A Preferred Stock was classified outside of permanent equity because the redemption provisions were not solely within our control. We incurred approximately
$7,212
of transaction fees in connection with the TPG Investment, which have been offset against the proceeds received. The contingent beneficial conversion feature of the Series A Preferred Stock was recognized upon stockholder approval of the conversion and amortized at the time of conversion by treating it as a deemed dividend in retained earnings and crediting additional paid-in capital for
$11,894
, consequently resulting in no diminution in total shareholders' equity or book value per share. We have assessed the provisions of the Series A Preferred Stock and concluded that the impact of any embedded derivative features was not material.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31,
2013
, our cash and cash equivalents were invested primarily in money market accounts that invest primarily in U.S. government securities. Due to the short maturity period of the cash equivalents, the carrying amount of these instruments approximate their fair values.
Our cash items that are restricted as to withdrawal or usage include deposits of
$3,956
and
$4,682
as of December 31,
2013
and
2012
, respectively. The balance as of December 31,
2013
is comprised primarily of
$3,622
on deposit to collateralize letters of credit,
$112
in land escrow accounts and
$222
of housing deposits from customers that will become available when the housing contracts close.
47
Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories are stated at cost unless the asset is determined to be impaired, in which case the asset is written to its fair value. Land and Other Inventories include expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated indirect costs. Land and Other Inventories owned and constructed by us also include interest cost capitalized until development and construction are substantially completed. Land and development costs, construction and direct and allocated indirect costs are assigned to components of Land and Other Inventories based on specific identification, relative sales value, or area allocation methods.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment
(“ASC 360”), we review our Land and Other Inventories for indicators of impairment.
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. The discount rate used in the determination of fair value would vary, depending on the state of development. Assumptions and estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on expectations of future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below. Changes to these assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows, which could affect the potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation process, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
For assets held for sale (such as homes completed or under construction or vacant land parcels available for sale), we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value (estimated sales price) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less cost to sell is less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell.
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis to reflect market conditions, including a significant oversupply of homes available for sale, higher foreclosure activity and significant competition. During the
years ended
December 31, 2013
and 2012, our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of
$33
and
$1,635
, respectively, which related to homes completed or under construction, and
$677
and
$49,749
, respectively, in impairment charges related to land developed and/or held for future development or sale.
In 2013, we changed our plans to sell certain assets, resulting in the reclassification of these assets to Land and Other Inventories and a reversal of previously recorded impairment expense of
$958
. As of December 31, 2013, other than the Land and Other Inventories that we determined to be impaired and accordingly were written down to fair value, and excluding homes completed or under construction, we had no other Land and Other Inventories that had estimated undiscounted cash flows less than their carrying values. However, we can give no assurance that any future evaluations will not result in further impairments given the real estate market, the likelihood of increased competition within the age restricted segment as conditions improve, and other factors as more fully described below.
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include our: (i) housing communities (active adult and primary residential, including scattered lots) and (ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. A discussion of the factors that impact our impairment assessment for these categories follows.
Housing communities
:
Homebuilding activities include the development of active adult and primary residential communities and the operation of amenities. The operating results and losses generated from active adult and primary residential communities during the
years ended
December 31, 2013
and
2012
include operating expenses relating to the operation of the amenities in our communities as well as divisional overhead allocated among several communities.
Our active adult and primary residential communities are generally large master-planned communities in Florida and in Arizona. Several of these communities are long-term projects on land we have owned for many years. In reviewing each of our communities, we determine if potential impairment indicators exist by reviewing various factors such as actual margins on homes closed in recent months, projected margins on homes in backlog, projected margins on speculative homes, average selling prices, sales activities and local market conditions. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated cost of home construction, estimated land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead
48
costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas in which we build and sell homes, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. The build-out of our active adult residential communities generally exceeds
five years
. Our assumptions are based on current activity and recent trends at our active adult and primary residential communities. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial number of variables related to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Declines in margins below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations could result in future impairment losses in one or more of our housing communities.
Land developed and/or held for future development or sale
: Our land developed and/or held for future development or sale represents land holdings for the potential development of future active adult and/or primary residential communities, commercial and industrial uses. For land developed and/or held for future development or sale, indicators of potential impairment include changes in use, changes in local market conditions, declines in the selling prices of similar assets and increases in costs. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows could be significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated costs of home construction, estimated land and land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows could also be impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas where we own land for future development, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. Factors that we consider in determining the appropriateness of moving forward with land development or whether to write-off the related amounts capitalized include: our current inventory levels, local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources and the estimated future net cash flows to be generated from the project.
Receivables, net
Receivables, net includes amounts in transit or due from title companies for house closings; membership dues related to our amenity operations; and contracts and mortgage notes receivable from the sale of land.
Income Tax Receivable
Income tax receivable consists of tax refunds we expect to receive within
one year
. As of December 31,
2013
and
2012
, there was
$0
and
$1,293
, respectively, of income tax receivables. We received an income tax refund of
$1,293
during
2013
.
Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: land improvements
10 years
to
25 years
; buildings and improvements
8
to
39 years
; and machinery, equipment and fixtures
3
to
7 years
. Maintenance and operating expenses of equipment utilized in the development of land are capitalized to land inventory. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Property and Equipment includes the cost of amenities such as club facilities on properties owned by us. The cost of amenities includes expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated costs. Property and Equipment owned and constructed by us also includes interest cost incurred during development and construction.
Each reporting period, we review our Property and Equipment for indicators of impairment in accordance with ASC 360. For our amenities, which are located within our housing communities, indicators of potential impairment are similar to those of our housing communities (described in Note 2), as these factors may impact our ability to generate revenues at our amenities or cause construction costs to increase. In addition, we factor in the collectability and potential delinquency of the fees due for our amenities. For the
years ended
December 31, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, we did not identify indicators of impairments for Property and Equipment. During 2013, management changed its plans to sell certain assets, resulting in the reclassification of these assets from assets held for sale to property and equipment. There was no change in the carrying value in these assets due to this reclassification.
Assets Held for Sale
49
We classify assets held for sale in accordance with the criteria set forth in ASC 360. We continue to execute a portfolio rationalization plan whereby we opportunistically sell non-core commercial and industrial assets, as well as scattered lot positions and land assets that are in excess of our needed supply in a given market. Under this plan, assets that meet the criteria above are classified as held for sale. During 2013, we changed our plans to sell certain assets, resulting in the reclassification of approximately
$13.8 million
of assets to Land and Other Inventories and a reversal of previously recorded impairment expense of
$958
. Additionally, approximately
$4.1 million
of assets held for sale were sold and approximately
$16.1 million
of assets were added to assets held for sale during 2013.
For assets held for sale (such as homes completed or under construction or vacant land parcels available for sale), we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value (estimated sales price) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less cost to sell is less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell.
Goodwill
Goodwill of
$17,215
recorded in connection with an acquisition in 2010 was written off in 2011. We evaluated the recoverability of goodwill by comparing the carrying value of our active adult reporting unit to fair value. Fair value was determined using discounted cash flows supplemented by market comparisons of fair value. Impairment was measured as the difference between the resulting implied fair value of goodwill and its recorded carrying value.
Investments in Partnerships and LLCs
When we are either deemed to hold the controlling interest in a voting interest entity or deemed to be the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) we are required to consolidate the investment. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb the majority of losses of the VIE or the right to receive the majority of benefits from the VIE. Investments where we don't hold the controlling interest and we are not the primary beneficiary are accounted for under the equity method.
Factors considered when determining if we hold the controlling interest in a voting interest entity include who holds the general partnership or managing member interests, which partner or member makes the day-to-day decisions regarding the operations of the entity, and whether or not the other partners or members have substantive participating rights. With respect to VIE's, our variable interests may be in the form of
(1)
equity ownership,
(2)
contracts to purchase assets and/or
(3)
loans provided by us to the investor. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), sufficiency of equity to conduct the operations of the entity, voting rights, involvement in decisions significantly impacting the entity's economic performance, level of economic disproportionality between us and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.
Non-Controlling Interest
We have consolidated certain investments in LLCs, where AV Homes is determined to be either the primary beneficiary or the controlling member. Therefore, the LLCs’ financial statements are consolidated in our financial statements and the other partners’ equity in each of the LLCs is recorded as non-controlling interest as a component of consolidated equity. At December 31,
2013
and
2012
, non-controlling interest was
$15,633
and
$13,704
, respectively. The increase in non-controlling interest is attributable to capital contributions of
$731
and net income of
$1,205
, offset by distributions of
$7
from these LLCs during the year ended December 31,
2013
.
Retirement of Treasury Stock
In December 2011, we retired
1,409,832
shares of treasury stock. These shares remain as authorized stock; however they are now considered unissued. In accordance with ASC 505,
Equity
(“ASC 505”), the treasury stock retirement resulted in reductions to common stock of
$1,410
, treasury stock of
$33,086
, retained earnings of
$7,411
and paid in capital of
$24,264
. There was no effect on the total stockholders’ equity position as a result of the retirement.
In March 2012, we retired
1,141,400
shares of treasury stock, which shares also remain as authorized but unissued. This treasury stock retirement resulted in reductions to common stock of
$1,141
, treasury stock of
$42,905
, retained earnings of
$18,848
and paid in capital of
$22,919
. There was no effect on the total stockholders’ equity position as a result of the retirement.
50
Revenues
In accordance with ASC 360, revenues from the sales of housing units are recognized when the sales are closed and title passes to the purchasers. In addition, revenues from commercial, industrial and other land sales are recognized in full at closing, provided the buyer's initial and continuing investment is adequate, any financing is considered collectible and there is no significant continuing involvement. Sales incentives are included in Real Estate Revenue-Homebuilding in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, advertising costs totaled
$2,445
,
$2,907
and
$2,537
, respectively. Advertising costs, sales commissions and closing costs are included in Real Estate Expenses--Homebuilding in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Warranty Costs
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. Reserves are determined based on historical data and other relevant factors. We have, and require our subcontractors to have, general liability, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and available policy limits. We may have recourse against subcontractors for certain claims relating to workmanship and materials. Warranty reserves are included in Accrued and Other Liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
During the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, changes in the warranty reserve consist of the following:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Accrued warranty reserve, beginning of year
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
Estimated warranty expense
|
578
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
453
|
|
|||
|
Amounts charged against warranty reserve
|
(489
|
)
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|||
|
Accrued warranty reserve, end of year
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been provided using the liability method under ASC 740,
Income Taxes
(“ASC 740”). The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes where deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
We evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During
2013
and
2012
we recognized an increase of
$3,699
and
$35,050
, respectively, in the valuation allowance. As of December 31,
2013
, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was
$130,232
. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
On October 25, 2010, we received notification from the Internal Revenue Service that our federal income tax returns for tax years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2009 were being examined. On February 10, 2012, we agreed with the Internal Revenue Service’s Notice of Proposed Adjustment to the 2009 net operating loss carryback. This adjustment generated an income tax expense of
$473
for 2011 with a reduction in the anticipated income tax receivable in the same amount. The related income tax receivable was collected in 2013.
Any interest or penalties that have been assessed in the past have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we are assessed any interest or penalties in the future, we plan to include them in our statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as income tax expense.
51
In 2006, we sold property we owned in Marion County, Florida to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida under threat of condemnation. The bulk of the land was transferred in 2006 and the final closing took place in 2007. These transactions and subsequent correspondence with the Internal Revenue Service entitled us to defer payment of income taxes of
$24,355
from the gain on these sales until replacement property is sold, provided we obtained qualifying replacement property for the Marion County property by December 31, 2010. We believe that we acquired appropriate replacement properties by December 31, 2010. If the Internal Revenue Service determines in the future that some or all of the properties acquired by us as replacement properties do not qualify as replacement properties, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the value of the portion of the properties determined not to qualify as replacement property.
Share-Based Compensation
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as amended, (the “Incentive Plan”) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of AV Homes. The exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the stock exchange closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire
10 years
after the date of grant.
As of December 31,
2013
, an aggregate of
1,078,455
shares of our common stock, subject to certain adjustments, were reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan, including an aggregate of
741,881
options, restricted stock units and stock units granted. There were
336,574
shares available for grant at December 31,
2013
.
Employee Benefit Plans
We have a defined contribution savings plan that covers substantially all employees. Under this savings plan, we may contribute to the plan based upon specified percentages of employees' voluntary contributions. We made
no
contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
.
Loss Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to AV Homes stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of AV Homes. The computation of diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 did not assume the effect of restricted stock units, employee stock options, the
4.50%
Notes, the
7.50%
Notes, or the 7.50% Exchange Notes because the effects were antidilutive.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding in calculating basic earnings per share includes the issuance of
9,272,795
,
122,388
and
140,143
shares of our common stock for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively, due to the stock issued in connection with the 2013 TPG Investment as described above, and conversion of restricted stock units each year. Excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
are
100,898
,
209,270
and
439,000
, respectively, restricted shares that are subject to vesting and performance requirements (see Note 9). In accordance with ASC 260, nonvested shares are not included in basic earnings per share until the vesting and performance requirements are met.
In accordance with ASC 470-20, an embedded beneficial conversion feature present in a convertible instrument shall be recognized separately by allocating a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid-in-capital. Intrinsic value shall be calculated at the commitment date (preferred stock issuance) as the difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the common stock into which the security is convertible. The most favorable conversion price shall be used to measure the intrinsic value. The intrinsic value of the contingent beneficial conversion feature was recognized upon resolution of the contingency (shareholder approval of conversion) as a deemed dividend on the convertible preferred stock, and is added to net loss to arrive at loss attributable to common stockholders in the loss per share calculation. The deemed dividend had a (
$.75
) per share effect on earnings for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The following table represents a reconciliation of the net loss and weighted average shares outstanding for the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for the years ended
December 31, 2013
,
2012
and
2011
:
52
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic and diluted loss per share – net loss
|
$
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
Deemed dividend related to the beneficial conversion feature
|
(11,894
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(21,371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
15,935,701
|
|
|
12,557,416
|
|
|
12,448,423
|
|
|||
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss and comprehensive loss are the same for the years ended
December 31, 2013
,
2012
and
2011
.
Note 2 -
Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Active Adult
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Land developed and in process of development
|
$
|
57,138
|
|
|
$
|
51,341
|
|
|
Land held for future development or sale
|
58,423
|
|
|
53,526
|
|
||
|
Homes completed or under construction
|
25,478
|
|
|
21,974
|
|
||
|
Total Active Adult
|
141,039
|
|
|
126,841
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Primary Residential
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Land developed and in process of development
|
77,983
|
|
|
22,088
|
|
||
|
Homes completed or under construction
|
11,013
|
|
|
8,589
|
|
||
|
Total Primary Residential
|
88,996
|
|
|
30,677
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Land developed and in process of development-Other
|
10,043
|
|
|
13,526
|
|
||
|
|
$
|
240,078
|
|
|
$
|
171,044
|
|
Note 3 -
Property and Equipment
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Property and Equipment balance consisted of the following:
53
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Land Improvements
|
$
|
21,734
|
|
|
$
|
21,815
|
|
|
Building
|
38,700
|
|
|
37,600
|
|
||
|
Equipment
|
5,434
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
||
|
Motor Vehicles
|
603
|
|
|
670
|
|
||
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
3,344
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
||
|
Capitalized Software
|
1,928
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
||
|
Gross property and equipment
|
71,743
|
|
|
69,850
|
|
||
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation
|
(33,899
|
)
|
|
(33,189
|
)
|
||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
37,844
|
|
|
$
|
36,661
|
|
As of December 31, 2013 we had
$969
of Equipment with
$615
of accumulated depreciation that were financed with capital leases.
Note 4 -
Investments in Partnerships and LLCs
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from
20%
to
58.2%
for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest or be the primary beneficiary. We determine the method for accounting for our investment at inception or upon a reconsideration event.
Consolidated Investments
During 2009, we entered into
two
separate agreements with unrelated third parties providing for the formation of
two
LLCs. We subsequently sold developed, partially developed and undeveloped land to each of the companies for a combination of cash and purchase money notes. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and participate in the management of each of the LLCs. We also entered into land option contracts with these LLCs. Under such land option contracts, we paid a specified option deposit in consideration for the right, but not the obligation, to purchase developed lots in the future at predetermined prices.
In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with JEN Arizona 4, LLC to form a limited liability company, EM 646, LLC (“EM 646”). We hold a
58.2%
interest in the venture, which was organized for the purpose of acquiring, entitling, developing, and distributing specific sections of real property located in Mesa, Arizona. The property was acquired in November 2012 and will be distributed to the partners at cost, once certain entitlements and development activities are completed.
As of
December 31, 2013
and
2012
, our consolidated balance sheets include
$33,997
and
$32,659
, respectively, in Land and Other Inventories owned by these LLCs.
In January 2012, all of the real property owned by one of our consolidated joint ventures was sold to an unrelated third party. The net gain on this sale of approximately
$2,731
is fully recognized and included as a component of net loss on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). We present the joint venture partner's
60%
share of this income,
$1,639
, on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as a component of net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities for the year ended December 31, 2012.
We and our equity partners make initial or ongoing capital contributions to these consolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make capital contributions is governed by each consolidated entity’s respective operating agreement.
As of
December 31, 2013
, these consolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or our equity partners. The assets of our investees can only be used to settle obligations of the investees.
Equity Method Investments
We own non-controlling equity interests ranging from
20%
to
50%
in entities formed for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land. We analyze these entities when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event. These investments are accounted for under the equity method.
We share in the profits and losses of these unconsolidated entities generally in accordance with our ownership interests. We and our equity partners make initial and ongoing capital contributions to these unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make capital contributions is governed by each unconsolidated entity’s respective operating agreement. We made contributions totaling
$111
,
$135
and
$138
to our unconsolidated entities during
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
, respectively.
The following are the combined condensed balance sheets of the entities we account for under the equity method as of
December 31, 2013
and
2012
:
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
Land and other inventory
|
6,131
|
|
|
6,126
|
|
||
|
Other assets
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
6,206
|
|
|
$
|
6,185
|
|
|
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
Partners’ capital of:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
AV Homes
|
1,230
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
||
|
Equity partners
|
4,896
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities and partners’ capital
|
$
|
6,206
|
|
|
$
|
6,185
|
|
The following are the combined condensed statements of operations of these entities for the
years ended
December 31:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
6,081
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
258
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
|||
|
Net income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
|
$
|
(258
|
)
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
AV Homes' share of income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
(398
|
)
|
Note 5 -
Notes Payable
Notes payable are summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
7.50% Convertible Notes, due 2016
|
$
|
55,500
|
|
|
$
|
55,500
|
|
|
7.50% Exchange Notes, due 2016
|
44,500
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
||
|
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes, due 2024
|
5,402
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
105,402
|
|
|
$
|
105,402
|
|
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024
On March 30, 2004, we issued
$120,000
aggregate principal amount of our
4.50%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the “4.50% Notes”) in a private offering. Interest on the 4.50% Notes is 4.50% per year, payable in cash, semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, and mature on April 1, 2024 unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased.
54
Between 2007 and 2011, we repurchased
$114,598
of principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for
$104,473
, including accrued interest. As of December 31,
2013
,
$5,402
aggregate principal amount of the
4.50%
Notes remain outstanding.
Conversion
: The 4.50% Notes are convertible into our common stock upon the occurrence of certain triggers described in the Indenture (the “4.50% Indenture”). Shares of our common stock, into which the 4.50% Notes are convertible, have been reserved for issuance.
Repurchase Right/Redemption Right
: Holders of the 4.50% Notes had the right to require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011 and have the right to require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019 or upon the occurrence of a “fundamental change” (as defined in the 4.50% Indenture) or a “termination of trading” (as defined in the 4.50% Indenture). We may, at any time, at our option, redeem for cash all or any portion of the outstanding 4.50% Notes. In the case of a repurchase or redemption, we will pay a repurchase or redemption price, as applicable, equal to
100%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
ASC 470-20 requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. ASC 470-20 requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount and the debt issuance costs are amortized to interest cost using the interest method over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component. The discount on the liability component of the 4.50% Notes was amortized using the effective interest method based on an effective rate of
7.50%
, which was the estimated market interest rate for similar debt without a conversion option on the issuance date. The discount was amortized from the issuance date in 2004 through April 1, 2011, the first date that holders of the 4.50% Notes could require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes. The discount was fully amortized in 2011.
7.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2016
On February 4, 2011, we completed an underwritten public offering for
$100,000
aggregate principal amount of our
7.50%
Senior Convertible Notes due 2016 (the “7.50% Notes”). The 7.50% Notes mature on February 15, 2016 unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. The 7.50% Notes are governed by the Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture, each dated February 4, 2011 (collectively, the “First Supplemental Indenture”), between us and the trustee named therein. The First Supplemental Indenture requires us to maintain, at all times until February 15, 2014, cash and cash equivalents of not less than
$20,000
. Interest on the 7.50% Notes is 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year. As of December 31,
2013
,
$55,500
aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Notes remain outstanding. The other
$44,500
of original principal balance was exchanged for other convertible notes as discussed below.
Conversion
: Holders may convert the 7.50% Notes into shares of our common stock at any time on or prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date of February 15, 2016. The 7.50% Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of
33.3333
shares of common stock per
$1
principal amount of the 7.50% Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$30.00
per share). The conversion rate, and thus the conversion price, may be adjusted under certain circumstances, including upon the occurrence of a “non-stock change of control” as such term is defined in the First Supplemental Indenture. Upon any conversion, subject to certain exceptions, holders will not receive any cash payment representing accrued and unpaid interest. Shares of our common stock, into which the 7.50% Notes are convertible, have been reserved for issuance.
Repurchase Right
: Holders of the 7.50% Notes had the right to require us to repurchase the 7.50% Notes on February 15, 2014 or upon the occurrence of a “fundamental change” (as defined in the First Supplemental Indenture), in each case at a repurchase price equal to
100%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holders put
$19
of the 7.5% Notes to us on February 15, 2014. The holders of the 7.50% Notes also have the right to require us to repurchase
50%
of the 7.50% Notes upon the occurrence of a breach of the above financial covenant at a repurchase price equal to
110%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Redemption Right
: We may, at any time on or after February 15, 2014, at our option, redeem for cash all or any portion of the outstanding 7.50% Notes at a redemption price equal to
100%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, but only if the last reported sale price of our common stock for
20 days
or more trading days in a period of
30
consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date that we provide the notice of redemption to holders exceeds
130%
of the conversion price in effect on each such trading day and certain other conditions described in the First Supplemental Indenture are met.
55
7.50% Senior Exchange Convertible Notes due 2016
In July 2012, we entered into exchange agreements under which we retired
$44,500
in aggregate principal amount of our
7.50%
Notes, in exchange for the issuance of
$44,500
in aggregate principal of new
7.50%
Senior Exchange Convertible Notes due 2016 (“7.50% Exchange Notes”). The 7.50% Exchange Notes mature on February 15, 2016 unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. The 7.50% Exchange Notes are governed by the Indenture dated February 4, 2011 and the Second Supplemental Indenture dated July 25, 2012 between us and the trustee named therein (collectively, the “Second Supplemental Indenture”). The Second Supplemental Indenture includes the same financial covenant as the one governing the 7.50% Notes. Interest on the 7.50% Exchange Notes is 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing February 15, 2013. In conjunction with the issuance of the 7.50% Exchange Notes, we wrote off
$1,144
of deferred costs associated with the 7.50% Notes.
Conversion
: The 7.50% Exchange Notes are convertible and have an initial conversion rate of
55.5555
shares of common stock per
$1
principal amount of notes (equivalent to a conversion price of approximately
$18.00
per share), subject to adjustment in certain events. We have the right, but not an obligation, to require holders to convert the 7.50% Exchange Notes in whole or in part if the closing price of our common stock equals or exceeds
130%
of the conversion price then in effect for a specified period and certain other conditions are satisfied. Shares of our common stock, into which the 7.50% Exchange Notes are convertible, have been reserved for issuance.
Repurchase Right
: Unlike the 7.50% Notes, the 7.50% Exchange Notes did not provide the holders the right to require us to repurchase the 7.50% Exchange Notes on February 15, 2014. However, holders of the 7.50% Exchange Notes have the right to require us to repurchase the 7.50% Exchange Notes upon the occurrence of a “fundamental change” (as defined in the Second Supplemental Indenture). The holders of the 7.50% Exchange Notes also have the right to require us to repurchase
50%
of the 7.50% Exchange Notes upon the occurrence of a breach of the above financial covenant at a repurchase price equal to
110%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Redemption Right
: We have the right to redeem the 7.50% Exchange Notes on or after February 15, 2015. Prior to that date, the 7.50% Exchange Notes are redeemable, on one occasion only, upon the occurrence of certain events and the satisfaction of certain conditions (as described in the Second Supplemental Indenture). In each case, the redemption price is equal to
100%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
We have assessed the 7.50% Exchange Notes and concluded that the impact of any embedded derivative features are not material as of
December 31, 2013
, subject to further review over the life of the 7.50% Exchange Notes. As of
December 31, 2013
,
$44,500
aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Exchange Notes remain outstanding.
Maturities of notes payable at December 31,
2013
are as follows:
|
|
Total
|
||
|
2014
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
2015
|
—
|
|
|
|
2016
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2017
|
—
|
|
|
|
2018
|
—
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,402
|
|
The following table represents interest incurred, interest capitalized, and interest expense for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Interest incurred
|
$
|
9,296
|
|
|
$
|
9,236
|
|
|
$
|
9,955
|
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
(6,466
|
)
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|||
|
Interest expense
|
$
|
2,830
|
|
|
$
|
7,973
|
|
|
$
|
9,516
|
|
We made interest payments of
$7,929
,
$7,587
and
$6,136
for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
respectively.
56
Note 6 -
Lease Commitments
We lease the majority of our administration and sales offices under operating leases that expire at varying times through 2019. Rental expense for the years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
was
$468
,
$409
, and
$1,809
, respectively. The decrease in rental expense in 2012 over 2011 is primarily attributable to the lease termination associated with the closing of our corporate office in Coral Gables, Florida upon the relocation of this office to Scottsdale, Arizona. Minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31,
2013
, are as follows: 2014 -
$602
; 2015 -
$552
; 2016 -
$555
; 2017 -
$384
; 2018 -
$201
; thereafter -
$103
. Capital lease obligations as of December 31, 2013 are as follows: 2014 -
$270
; 2015 -
$76
; 2016 -
$32
.
Note 7 -
Accrued and Other Liabilities
Accrued and other liabilities are summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Property taxes and assessments
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
439
|
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
2,873
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
||
|
Accrued compensation
|
3,080
|
|
|
960
|
|
||
|
Warranty reserve
|
638
|
|
|
549
|
|
||
|
Infrastructure obligations
|
5,073
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
||
|
Other
|
2,309
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
||
|
|
$
|
14,280
|
|
|
$
|
12,978
|
|
Note 8 -
Estimated Development Liability for Sold Land
The estimated development liability consists primarily of utilities improvements in Poinciana and Rio Rico for more than
8,000
home sites previously sold, in most cases prior to 1980, and is summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Gross estimated unexpended costs
|
$
|
36,117
|
|
|
$
|
35,879
|
|
|
Less costs relating to unsold home sites
|
(2,885
|
)
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
||
|
Estimated development liability for sold land
|
$
|
33,232
|
|
|
$
|
32,974
|
|
The estimated development liability for sold land is reduced by actual expenditures and is evaluated and adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect management’s estimate of potential costs. In addition, we obtain third-party engineer evaluations and adjust this liability to reflect changes in the estimated costs. We recorded charges associated with these obligations of
$317
,
$88
, and
($794)
during
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
, respectively. Cash expenditures associated with these obligations were
$59
,
$88
, and
$299
during 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction, material and labor, as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs, may have a significant effect on the estimated development liability.
Note 9 -
Share-Based Payments and Other Compensation
On June 2, 2011, our stockholders approved the Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2011 Restatement) (the "Incentive Plan") to, among other things, increase the aggregate number of shares of our common stock, par value
$1.00
per share, authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan by
700,000
shares from
1,500,000
shares to
2,200,000
shares and extend the term of the Incentive Plan until October 25, 2020. The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to our officers, employees and directors. The exercise price of stock options may not be less than the stock exchange closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire
10
years after the date of grant.
As of
December 31, 2013
, an aggregate of
1,078,455
shares of our common stock, subject to certain adjustments, were reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan, including an aggregate of
741,881
options, restricted stock units and stock units granted. There were
336,574
shares available for grant at
December 31, 2013
.
During 2013, we cancelled
114,750
restricted shares granted in 2011 to certain executives and issued additional performance-based restricted shares in exchange. We also issued performance-based restricted shares to other members of management. Vesting is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance objectives, some of which are subjective in nature. Compensation cost for these awards is recognized over the service period, and variable accounting is applied whereby the fair value of the award is remeasured each reporting period until vesting occurs. The cancellation and issuance of shares was accounted for as a modification with the future compensation expense computed using the greater of unamortized fair value of the cancelled awards or the incremental fair value as remeasured each reporting period.
Compensation expense related to the stock option, restricted stock, and restricted stock unit awards during the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
was
$1,648
and
$3,034
, and
$1,850
, respectively. During
2013
, we granted
585,036
stock options, which have a weighted average grant date fair value of
$8.75
per share. During 2013, we granted
95,242
restricted stock unit awards, which have a weighted average grant date fair value of
$21.95
per share.
As of
December 31, 2013
, there was
$1,598
of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.85
years.
As of
December 31, 2013
, there was
$4,787
of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.4 years
.
Under ASC 718
Stock Compensation
("ASC 718"), the fair value of awards of restricted stock and units which do not contain a specified hurdle price condition is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Under ASC 718, the fair value of restricted stock awards that contain a specified hurdle price condition is estimated on the grant date using the Monte-Carlo option valuation model. Under ASC 718, the fair value of each stock option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The valuation models require assumptions and estimates to determine expected volatility, expected life, expected dividend yield and expected risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility was determined using historical volatility of our stock based on the contractual life of the award. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury strips at the award grant date. We also used historical data to estimate forfeiture experience.
57
The significant weighted average assumptions used for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
were as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Dividend yield
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|||
|
Volatility rate
|
52.37%-52.49%
|
|
|
47.40%-61.25%
|
|
|
40.24%-52.55%
|
|
|||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.66%-1.86%
|
|
|
0.17%-0.43%
|
|
|
0.15%-0.65%
|
|
|||
|
Expected life (years)
|
6.25
|
|
|
0.50-4.08
|
|
|
0.26-4.41
|
|
|||
|
Weighted average fair value of units granted
|
$
|
8.75
|
|
|
$
|
7.98
|
|
|
$
|
11.63
|
|
A summary of the status of the stock option activity for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
is presented below:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Stock
Options |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Stock
Options |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Stock
Options |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
Granted
|
585,036
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
(110,000
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
585,036
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|||
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2013, was
9.8
years.
A summary of the restricted stock and stock units activity for the year ended December 31,
2013
, is presented below:
|
|
Restricted
Stock and
Stock Units
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
230,095
|
|
(1)
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
|
Granted
|
95,242
|
|
|
21.85
|
|
|
|
Converted/Exercised
|
(56,911
|
)
|
|
11.29
|
|
|
|
Expired/Forfeited/Cancelled
|
(147,838
|
)
|
|
16.88
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
120,588
|
|
|
$
|
19.68
|
|
(1)
Restricted stock shares are considered legally outstanding but are not considered outstanding for accounting purposes until the vesting conditions are satisfied in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance.
Under a deferral program, non-management directors may elect to defer up to
50%
of annual retainer fees, committee fees and/or chairperson fees, for which the director is credited with a number of stock units based upon the closing price of our common stock on the due date of each payment. The number of stock units become distributable as shares of common stock upon the earlier of a date designated by the individual director or the date of the individual’s separation from service as a director. No stock units were distributed to non-management directors during the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. The outstanding balance of stock units as of December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
was
36,257
,
30,929
and
23,053
, respectively.
Note 10 -
Income Taxes
58
Income taxes have been provided using the liability method under ASC 740. The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes where deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
are as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
State
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total current
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Federal
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
473
|
|
|||
|
State
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total deferred
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
473
|
|
|||
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2013
and
2012
are as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Tax over book basis of land inventory
|
$
|
14,922
|
|
|
$
|
14,564
|
|
|
Unrecoverable land development costs
|
6,359
|
|
|
6,622
|
|
||
|
Executive incentive compensation
|
1,030
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
||
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
50,136
|
|
|
33,872
|
|
||
|
Impairment charges
|
63,982
|
|
|
74,551
|
|
||
|
Other
|
4,031
|
|
|
5,428
|
|
||
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
140,460
|
|
|
136,136
|
|
||
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
(130,232
|
)
|
|
(126,533
|
)
|
||
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
10,228
|
|
|
9,603
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Book over tax income recognized on sale of the Ocala Property
|
(8,413
|
)
|
|
(9,118
|
)
|
||
|
Tax over book on 4.50% Convertible Notes
|
(589
|
)
|
|
(696
|
)
|
||
|
Book over tax basis of depreciable assets
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
211
|
|
||
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
(10,228
|
)
|
|
(9,603
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net deferred income tax liability
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Our gross federal and state NOL carryforwards are approximately
$119,300
and
$269,800
, respectively. Federal NOL carryforwards may be used to offset future taxable income for
20 years
and begin to expire in 2030. State NOL carryforwards may be used to offset future taxable income for a period of time ranging from
5
to
20 years
, depending on the state, and begin to expire in 2015.
In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the
59
consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During
2013
, we recognized an increase of
$3,699
in the deferred tax valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets generated from the pretax loss for the year. As of
December 31, 2013
, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was
$130,232
. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
On October 25, 2010, we received notification from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) that our federal income tax returns for tax years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2009 were being examined. On February 10, 2012, we agreed with the IRS’s Notice of Proposed Adjustment to the 2009 net operating loss carryback. This adjustment generated an income tax expense of
$473
for 2011 with a reduction in the anticipated income tax receivables in the same amount. Income tax receivable as of
December 31, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
consists of
$0
and
$1,293
, respectively, in anticipated income tax refunds.
In 2006, we sold property we owned in Marion County, Florida to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida under threat of condemnation. The bulk of the land was transferred in 2006 and the final closing took place in 2007. These transactions and subsequent correspondence with the IRS entitled us to defer payment of income taxes of
$24,355
from the gain on these sales until replacement property is sold provided we obtained qualifying replacement property for the Marion County property by December 31, 2010. We believe that we acquired appropriate replacement properties by December 31, 2010. If the IRS determines in the future that some or all of the properties acquired by us as replacement properties do not qualify as replacement properties, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the value of the portion of the properties determined not to qualify as replacement property.
No additional income tax benefits were generated from the exercise of share-based compensation during
2013
,
2012
and
2011
.
A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) to the expected income tax expense (benefit) at the federal statutory rate of
35%
for each of the years ended December 31,
2013
,
2012
and
2011
is as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory rate
|
$
|
(3,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31,582
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57,893
|
)
|
|
State income tax (benefit) expense, net of federal benefit
|
(385
|
)
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
|
(6,521
|
)
|
|||
|
Adjustment to 2009 net operating loss carryback
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
3,699
|
|
|
35,050
|
|
|
68,961
|
|
|||
|
Prior period adjustments charged to retained earnings
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,044
|
)
|
|||
|
Other
|
3
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|||
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
We received income tax payment refunds of
$1,293
and
$0
in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Note 11 -
Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved in various pending litigation matters primarily arising in the normal course of our business. These cases are in various procedural stages. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined, AV Homes believes it is probable, in accordance with ASC 450-20,
Loss Contingencies
, that certain claims may result in costs and expenses estimated at approximately
$275
and
$258
, which have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively
.
Liabilities or costs arising out of these and other currently pending litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Performance bonds, issued by third-party entities, are used primarily to guarantee our performance to construct improvements in our various communities. As of
December 31, 2013
, we had outstanding performance bonds of approximately
$11,185
. We do not believe that it is likely any of these outstanding performance bonds will be drawn upon.
Note 12 -
Other Matters
At our community of Solivita, tax-exempt bond financing is utilized to fund and manage portions of public infrastructure consisting primarily of storm water management facilities, drainage works, irrigation facilities, and water and wastewater utilities. The bonds were issued by the Poinciana Community Development District and Poinciana West Community Development District (the “CDDs”), independent special-purpose units of county government, established and operating in accordance with Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. The bonds are serviced by non-ad valorem special assessments levied on certain developable and developed property within Solivita, and the assessments constitute a liability against the developable and developed property and are intended to secure the CDDs’ ability to meet bond servicing obligations. In accordance with EITF 91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment Financing
, we record and pay the assessments on parcels we own when such assessments are fixed and determinable. The bonds are not a liability of AV Homes or any other landowner within the CDDs but are obligations secured by the land. For the developable and developed parcels we own within the CDDs, we pay the assessments until such parcels are sold. After a sale by AV Homes, we no longer pay the assessments on the parcel sold and any future assessments become the responsibility of the new owner and its successors in title until the bonds are paid in full.
60
Note 13 -
Business Segments
Our current operations include the following segments: the development, sale and management of active adult communities; the development and sale of primary residential communities; and the sale of commercial, industrial or other land. Our title insurance agency (which we sold in July 2011) did not qualify as a separate reportable segment and is included in “Other Operations”.
The following table summarizes our information for reportable segments for the
years ended
December 31, 2013
,
2012
, and
2011
:
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Segment revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Active adult communities
|
$
|
76,589
|
|
|
$
|
43,032
|
|
|
$
|
39,934
|
|
|
Primary residential communities
|
48,062
|
|
|
35,936
|
|
|
15,272
|
|
|||
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
16,303
|
|
|
26,595
|
|
|
31,731
|
|
|||
|
Other operations
|
528
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
932
|
|
|||
|
|
141,482
|
|
|
106,161
|
|
|
87,869
|
|
|||
|
Unallocated revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest income
|
2,148
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
309
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
70
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
804
|
|
|||
|
Total revenues
|
143,700
|
|
|
107,487
|
|
|
88,982
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Active adult communities
|
428
|
|
|
(8,919
|
)
|
|
(12,188
|
)
|
|||
|
Primary residential communities
|
2,437
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(7,527
|
)
|
|||
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
8,192
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|||
|
Other operations
|
(18
|
)
|
|
631
|
|
|
159
|
|
|||
|
|
11,039
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
(15,924
|
)
|
|||
|
Unallocated income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest income
|
2,148
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
309
|
|
|||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|||
|
Equity gain (loss) from unconsolidated entities
|
(101
|
)
|
|
259
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(15,975
|
)
|
|
(16,148
|
)
|
|
(17,502
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of Poinciana Parkway
|
—
|
|
|
(7,659
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(17,215
|
)
|
|||
|
Interest expense
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
(9,516
|
)
|
|||
|
Other real estate expenses
|
(2,834
|
)
|
|
(5,113
|
)
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|||
|
(Impairment) credit of land developed or held for future development
|
281
|
|
|
(49,749
|
)
|
|
(107,981
|
)
|
|||
|
Loss attributable to AV Homes
|
$
|
(8,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,704
|
)
|
61
|
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||
|
Segment assets:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Active adult communities
|
$
|
145,717
|
|
|
$
|
89,793
|
|
|
Primary residential communities
|
91,076
|
|
|
56,951
|
|
||
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
44,704
|
|
|
30,095
|
|
||
|
Assets held for sale
|
23,862
|
|
|
25,649
|
|
||
|
Unallocated assets
|
161,369
|
|
|
135,383
|
|
||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
466,728
|
|
|
$
|
337,871
|
|
|
a.
|
Our businesses are conducted in the United States.
|
|
b.
|
Identifiable assets by segment are those assets that are used in the operations of each segment.
|
|
c.
|
No significant part of the business is dependent upon a single customer or group of customers.
|
|
d.
|
The caption “Unallocated assets” under the table depicting the segment assets represents the following as of December 31,
2013
and
2012
, respectively: cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of
$148,333
and
$86,163
; land inventories of
$4,199
and
$36,715
; property and equipment of
$1,902
and
$2,164
; investment in and notes from unconsolidated entities of
$1,230
and
$1,220
; receivables of
$2,898
and
$4,661
; and prepaid expenses and other assets of
$2,807
and
$4,459
. None of the foregoing are directly attributable to a reportable segment in accordance with ASC 280.
|
|
e.
|
There is no interest expense from active adult communities, primary residential, and commercial, industrial and other land sales included in segment operating income/(loss) for 2013, 2012 and 2011.
|
|
f.
|
Included in segment operating income/(loss) for
2013
is depreciation expense (including amortization of assets under capital leases) of
$2,085
,
$46
and
$673
from active adult, primary residential and unallocated G&A/other, respectively. Included in segment operating income/(loss) for
2012
is depreciation expense of
$2,069
,
$90
and
$476
from active adult, primary residential and unallocated G&A/other, respectively. Included in segment operating income/(loss) for
2011
is depreciation expense of
$2,167
,
$546
and
$124
from active adult, primary residential and unallocated G&A/other, respectively.
|
|
g.
|
During fiscal year
2013
, impairment losses of approximately
$32
and
$1
reduced the carrying value of the assets of active adult and primary residential communities, respectively. During fiscal year
2012
, impairment losses of approximately
$1,620
and
$15
reduced the carrying value of the assets of active adult and primary residential communities, respectively. During fiscal year
2011
, impairment losses of approximately
$1,060
and
$467
reduced the carrying value of the assets of active adult and primary residential communities, respectively.
|
Note 14 -
Fair Value Disclosures
ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(“ASC 820”), provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, expands disclosures about fair value measurements, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The accounting standards require that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Fair value determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means.
Level 3: Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as discounted cash flows, or similar techniques.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, income tax receivable and accounts payable approximates the fair value due to their short-term maturities.
The majority of our non-financial instruments, which include Land and Other Inventories and Property and Equipment, are not required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur such that a non-financial instrument is required to be evaluated for impairment, a resulting asset impairment would require that the non-financial instrument be recorded at the lower of historical cost or its fair value.
For assets held for sale (vacant land parcels available for sale), we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value (estimated sales price) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less cost to sell is less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell.
In 2013, we changed our plans to sell certain assets that were held for sale. In accordance with ASC 360, these assets were reclassified and were measured at the lower of their carrying amounts before the assets were classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the assets been continuously classified as held and used, and their fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. As a result, the net carrying value of these assets was increased by
$958
. This increase is reflected as a reversal of impairment charges in 2013.
62
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. The discount rate used in the determination of fair value would vary depending on the stage of development. Assumptions and estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on expectations of future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below. Changes to these assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows which could affect the potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation process, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments at
December 31, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
are as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||
|
Notes Payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
4.50% Notes
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
|
$
|
5,425
|
|
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
|
$
|
5,343
|
|
|
7.50% Notes and 7.50% Exchange Notes
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
111,775
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
101,500
|
|
In estimating the fair value of financial instruments, we used the following methods and assumptions:
7.50%
Notes,
7.50%
Exchange Notes, and
4.50%
Notes:
At
December 31, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, the fair value of the
7.50%
Notes,
7.50%
Exchange Notes, and the
4.50%
Notes is estimated, based on quoted or estimated market prices. These fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Note 15 -
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial data for
2013
and
2012
is as follows:
|
|
2013 Quarter
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
25,119
|
|
|
$
|
29,556
|
|
|
$
|
34,999
|
|
|
$
|
54,025
|
|
|
Expenses
|
29,815
|
|
|
34,209
|
|
|
35,970
|
|
|
51,878
|
|
||||
|
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities
|
(63
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
(4,668
|
)
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
2,130
|
|
||||
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
306
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to AV Homes
|
$
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,668
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Basic and Diluted
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.86
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
63
|
|
2012 Quarter
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
26,710
|
|
|
$
|
18,966
|
|
|
$
|
28,652
|
|
|
$
|
33,159
|
|
|
Expenses
|
33,597
|
|
|
30,354
|
|
|
40,164
|
|
|
91,314
|
|
||||
|
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
376
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Loss before income taxes
|
(6,923
|
)
|
|
(11,431
|
)
|
|
(11,550
|
)
|
|
(57,779
|
)
|
||||
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
1,528
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
33
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net loss attributable to AV Homes
|
$
|
(8,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,583
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,856
|
)
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Basic and Diluted
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.92
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.67
|
)
|
|
1.
|
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year.
|
|
2.
|
During the first quarter of 2013 we did not have any impairment charges.
|
|
3.
|
During the second quarter of 2013, our impairment evaluation resulted in total impairment charges of
$45
, which related to impairment charges for homes completed or under construction.
|
|
4.
|
During the third quarter of 2013, our impairment evaluation resulted in a reversal of previously recorded impairment expense of
($970)
as a result of the reclassification of assets from Held for Sale to Land and Other Inventories.
|
|
5.
|
During the fourth quarter of 2013, our impairment evaluation resulted in total impairment charges of
$677
, which consisted of
$677
in impairment charges for land held in our Rio Rico community.
|
NOTE 16 -
Subsequent Events
On March 13, 2014, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain of the liabilities of Royal Oak Homes, LLC (“Royal Oak”) and certain land positions from an affiliate of Royal Oak. The total purchase price paid under the acquisition agreements was approximately
$65,000
, paid in cash, which includes a
$3 million
earn-out. The actual amount of the earn-out may be more or less than the
$3 million
target amount based on the performance of the Royal Oak business through the end of 2015. Royal Oak and its affiliate acquire and develop raw land and construct single family homes in the central Florida area. The transaction will expand our presence in Central Florida and our existing presence in the Poinciana market. With over
2,500
primary residential lots owned or controlled, Royal Oak enhances our position in a key growth market.
As of the date of this report, the initial accounting for this business combination is incomplete because the valuation of assets and liabilities acquired is still in process; therefore, certain disclosures required by ASC 805-10-50 cannot be made at this time. These disclosures include the amount of acquisition-related costs, the fair value of acquired receivables, the amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities acquired, the amount of goodwill recognized, if any, including a qualitative discussion of the factors that make up that goodwill, the total amount of goodwill deductible for tax purposes, the amount of goodwill by reportable segment, the fair value and description of contingent consideration, and the amount of revenue and earnings of Royal Oak since the date of acquisition and since the beginning of 2013.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
64
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have determined that, during the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2013
, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
See Part II - Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and the “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm," as they relate to internal control over financial reporting, incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, or, alternatively, by amendment to this Form 10-K under cover of Form 10-K/A no later than the end of such 120 day period, except for the information regarding the executive officers of AV Homes, which information is included in Part I of this Annual Report under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant."
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, or, alternatively, by amendment to this Form 10-K under cover of Form 10-K/A no later than the end of such 120 day period.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, or, alternatively, by amendment to this Form 10-K under cover of Form 10-K/A no later than the end of such 120 day period.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this
65
Form 10-K, or, alternatively, by amendment to this Form 10-K under cover of Form 10-K/A no later than the end of such 120 day period.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, or, alternatively, by amendment to this Form 10-K under cover of Form 10-K/A no later than the end of such 120 day period.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1)
Financial Statements and Schedules
:
See Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report.
(a)(2)
Financial Statements Schedules
:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted, since the information required is not applicable or is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
2.1
|
*2
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 13, 2014, by and among AV Homes, Inc., AVH Acquisition, LLC, Royal Oak Homes, LLC, Sam of Heathrow, LLC, William Colby Franks, Andrew J. Orosz, J. Matthew Orosz, Jody L. Orosz, as trustee of the Jody L. Orosz Family Trust dated February 18, 2004, Stephen W. Orosz, and William S. Orosz, Jr., as trustee of the William S. Orosz, Jr. Family Trust dated February 18, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated March 13, 2014 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
2.2
|
*2
|
Hanover Agreement, dated March 13, 2014, by and between William S. Orosz, Jr, Hanover Land Company, LLC, Hanover Aldea Reserve, LLC, Hanover Avalon Reserve, LLC, Hanover Barrington Estates, LLC, Hanover Black Lake, LLC, Hanover Emerald Lake, LLC, Hanover Hammock Trails I, LLC, Hanover Marbella, LLC, Pines at Lake Apopka, LLC, Spring Ridge Estates, LLC, Blue Lake Estates, LLC, AVH Acquisition, LLC, and AV Homes, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated March 13, 2014 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.1
|
*
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated May 28, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.2
|
*
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated May 26, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.3
|
*
|
Amended and Restated By-laws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2012 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.4
|
*
|
Certificate of Designation of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock of AV Homes, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.1
|
*
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2004, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, in respect of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.2
|
*
|
Indenture, dated February 4, 2011, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.3
|
*
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 4, 2011, between Avatar Holdings Inc., and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
66
|
4.4
|
*
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2013, by and between AV Homes, Inc. and Computershare Shareowner Services LLC, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.1
|
*1
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.2
|
*1
|
2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.3
|
*1
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee Directors' Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 13, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.4
|
*1
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
10.5
|
*
|
Option Agreement, dated October 20, 2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and The Nature Conservancy (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
10.6
|
*
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 by and between Osceola County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(ca) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.7
|
*
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as of December 20, 2006 by and between Polk County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(cb) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.8
|
*
|
Amendment to Avatar Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 4, 2007 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.9
|
*
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.10
|
*
|
Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated December 15, 2006, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.11
|
*
|
Amendment to Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.12
|
*
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Polk County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 11, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.13
|
*1
|
Amended and Restated Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee Directors' Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.97 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.14
|
*1
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., and Carl Mulac (filed as Exhibit 10.79 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.15
|
*1
|
Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Properties Inc., Terra West Communities LLC, JEN JCH, LLC, Joseph Carl Mulac III, Stephen Adams and Sun Terra Communities, LLC (collectively, “Sellers”), Avatar Holdings Inc., and JEN Partners, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.80 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.16
|
*1
|
Earn out Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed as Exhibit 10.81 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.17
|
*1
|
Voting Standstill and Lock-Up Letter Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed as Exhibit 10.82 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.18
|
*1
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed as Exhibit 10.83 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.19
|
*1
|
Stock Award Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Joseph Carl Mulac, III (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated April 29, 2011 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
67
|
10.20
|
*1
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2011 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 7, 2011 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.21
|
*1
|
Amended and Restated 2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (2011 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated June 7, 2011 (File No. 001-07395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.22
|
*1
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 15, 2011, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and Tina Johnston (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.23
|
*1
|
Stock Award Agreement, dated August 15, 2011, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Tina Johnston (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.24
|
*1
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 29, 2011, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and Carl Mulac (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.25
|
*1
|
Stock Award Agreement, dated September 29, 2011, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Carl Mulac (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.26
|
*1
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 29, 2011, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and Tina Johnston (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.27
|
*1
|
Stock Award Agreement, dated January 1, 2012, by and between Avatar Holdings, Inc. and Tina Johnston (filed as Exhibit 10.99 to form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
|
|
10.28
|
*1
|
Offer letter to Dave M. Gomez dated September 20, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.29
|
*
|
Agreement for Development of Poinciana Parkway, dated as of October 15, 2012, by and between Osceola County, Florida, Polk County, Florida, Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County Expressway Authority (filed as Exhibit 10.47 to Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.30
|
*1
|
Form of performance-based Stock Award Agreement for executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.31
|
*1
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Joseph Carl Mulac (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.32
|
*1
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Tina M. Johnston (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.33
|
*
|
First Amendment, dated April 5, 2013, to Registration Rights Agreement dated October 25, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.34
|
*
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 19, 2013, by and between AV Homes, Inc. and TPG Aviator, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.35
|
*
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated June 20, 2013, by and between AV Homes, Inc. and TPG Aviator, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.36
|
*
|
Management Services Agreement, dated June 20, 2013, by and between AV Homes, Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and TPG VI Management, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.37
|
*
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.38
|
*
|
Letter Agreement, dated June 19, 2013, by and between AV Homes, Inc. and TPG Aviator, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.39
|
*1
|
Michael S. Burnett Offer Letter dated September 24, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (File No. 1-7395), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.40
|
1
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2014, by and among AV Homes, Inc. and Roger Cregg (filed herewith).
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith).
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
|
68
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (furnished herewith).
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (furnished herewith).
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
|
* These exhibits are incorporated by reference and are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
1) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
2) Excludes exhibits and schedules, which the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
69
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
AV HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance at
Beginning of Period |
|
Charged to
Costs and Expenses |
|
Deduction/
(Addition) |
|
Balance at
End of Period |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
126,533
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
130,232
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
127,946
|
|
|
$
|
3,699
|
|
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
$
|
130,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
1,508
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
91,483
|
|
|
35,050
|
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
126,533
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
92,991
|
|
|
$
|
35,050
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
127,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,508
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
22,522
|
|
|
68,961
|
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
91,483
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
23,739
|
|
|
$
|
69,382
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(1)
We outsourced the management of our amenities to a third party service organization. Therefore we no longer carry a club fees receivable or its associated valuation allowance on our books as of December 31, 2013.
(2)
In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluated our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we recognized an increase of $68,961 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2011, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $91,483. During the year ended December 31, 2012 we recognized an increase of $35,050 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2012, our deferred tax valuation allowance was $126,533. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized an increase of $3,699 in the valuation allowance. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
AV HOMES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roger A. Cregg
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger A. Cregg, Director, President, and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roger A. Cregg
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger A. Cregg, Director, President, and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael S. Burnett
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Burnett, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joshua Nash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua Nash, Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Paul D. Barnett
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul D. Barnett, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roger W. Einiger
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger W. Einiger, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Reuben S. Leibowitz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reuben S. Leibowitz, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joel M. Simon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joel M. Simon, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kelvin L. Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelvin L. Davis, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Greg Kranias
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Kranias, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
March 17, 2014
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Paul Hackwell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Hackwell, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71