UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
 _______________________________________________________________________________________
Form 10-Q
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
or
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________            
Commission file number: 001-13417
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Walter Investment Management Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Maryland
 
13-3950486
(State or other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 1100
Tampa, FL
 
33607
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(813) 421-7600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Large accelerated filer
 
x
  
Accelerated filer
 
o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
o   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   o     No   x
The registrant had 37,643,598 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2014 .
_______________________________________________________________________________________ 
 



WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page
No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
 
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (unaudited)
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
 
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Item 5. Other Information
 
Item 6. Exhibits
 
Signatures
 



PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WALTER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
ASSETS
 
(unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
562,704

 
$
491,885

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
701,865

 
804,803

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,378,445

 
1,394,871

Residential loans at fair value
 
10,349,132

 
10,341,375

Receivables, net (includes $39,328 and $43,545 at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
271,685

 
319,195

Servicer and protective advances, net
 
1,400,367

 
1,381,434

Servicing rights, net (includes $1,513,830 and $1,131,124 at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,676,489

 
1,304,900

Goodwill
 
657,737

 
657,737

Intangible assets, net
 
117,215

 
122,406

Premises and equipment, net
 
147,415

 
155,847

Other assets (includes $41,903 and $62,365 at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
221,222

 
413,076

Total assets
 
$
17,484,276

 
$
17,387,529

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities (includes $16,665 and $26,571 at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
$
604,561

 
$
494,139

Servicer payables
 
626,595

 
735,225

Servicing advance liabilities
 
996,467

 
971,286

Debt
 
2,922,123

 
3,357,648

Mortgage-backed debt (includes $667,536 and $684,778 at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,844,537

 
1,887,862

HMBS related obligations at fair value
 
9,166,998

 
8,652,746

Deferred tax liability, net
 
130,853

 
121,607

Total liabilities
 
16,292,134

 
16,220,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders' equity:
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share:
 
 
 
 
Authorized - 10,000,000 shares
 
 
 
 
Issued and outstanding - 0 shares at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share:
 
 
 
 
Authorized - 90,000,000 shares
 
 
 
 
Issued and outstanding - 37,616,093 and 37,377,274 shares at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
 
376

 
374

Additional paid-in capital
 
588,315

 
580,572

Retained earnings
 
602,949

 
585,572

Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
502

 
498

Total stockholders' equity
 
1,192,142

 
1,167,016

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
17,484,276

 
$
17,387,529


3



The following table presents the assets and liabilities of the Company’s consolidated variable interest entities, which are included on the consolidated balance sheets above. The assets in the table below include those assets that can only be used to settle obligations of the consolidated variable interest entities. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of the consolidated variable interest entities only, and for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the Company, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation.

 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
ASSETS OF CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES THAT CAN ONLY BE USED TO SETTLE THE OBLIGATIONS OF CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES:
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
59

 
$

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
68,295

 
59,080

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,361,010

 
1,377,711

Residential loans at fair value
 
569,097

 
587,265

Receivables at fair value
 
39,328

 
43,545

Servicer and protective advances, net
 
101,466

 
75,481

Other assets
 
49,838

 
56,254

Total assets
 
$
2,189,093

 
$
2,199,336

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES OF THE CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES FOR WHICH CREDITORS OR BENEFICIAL INTEREST HOLDERS DO NOT HAVE RECOURSE TO THE COMPANY:
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
7,812

 
$
8,472

Servicing advance liabilities
 
97,675

 
67,905

Mortgage-backed debt (includes $667,536 and $684,778 at fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,844,537

 
1,887,862

Total liabilities
 
$
1,950,024

 
$
1,964,239

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


4



WALTER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)

 
 
For the Three Months 
 Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
172,792

 
$
137,009

Net gains on sales of loans
 
104,034

 
78,445

Interest income on loans
 
34,422

 
36,898

Insurance revenue
 
23,388

 
17,534

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
17,236

 
36,788

Other revenues
 
18,076

 
7,855

Total revenues
 
369,948

 
314,529

 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
Salaries and benefits
 
135,897

 
106,733

General and administrative
 
108,865

 
87,440

Interest expense
 
74,849

 
54,142

Depreciation and amortization
 
18,644

 
16,333

Other expenses, net
 
225

 
2,096

Total expenses
 
338,480

 
266,744

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER LOSSES
 
 
 
 
Other net fair value losses
 
(2,503
)
 
(1,261
)
Total other losses
 
(2,503
)
 
(1,261
)
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxes
 
28,965

 
46,524

Income tax expense
 
11,588

 
18,775

Net income
 
$
17,377

 
$
27,749

 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income
 
$
17,381

 
$
27,747

 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
17,377

 
$
27,749

 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per common and common equivalent share
 
$
0.46

 
$
0.74

Diluted earnings per common and common equivalent share
 
0.45

 
0.73

 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding — basic
 
37,429

 
36,877

Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding — diluted
 
38,005

 
37,634


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5



WALTER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)

 
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-
In Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2014
 
37,377,274

 
$
374

 
$
580,572

 
$
585,572

 
$
498

 
$
1,167,016

Net income
 

 

 

 
17,377

 

 
17,377

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 

 

 

 

 
4

 
4

Share-based compensation
 

 

 
3,493

 

 

 
3,493

Tax shortfall on share-based compensation, net
 

 

 
(18
)
 

 

 
(18
)
Issuance of shares under incentive plans
 
238,819

 
2

 
4,268

 

 

 
4,270

Balance at March 31, 2014
 
37,616,093

 
$
376

 
$
588,315

 
$
602,949

 
$
502

 
$
1,192,142

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



6



WALTER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)

 
 
For the Three Months 
 Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
17,377

 
$
27,749

 
 
 
 
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 
 
 
 
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
(17,236
)
 
(36,788
)
Amortization of servicing rights
 
11,117

 
11,324

Change in fair value of servicing rights
 
47,634

 
21,075

Non-Residual Trusts net fair value losses
 
5,229

 
735

Other net fair value losses
 
473

 
4,087

Accretion of residential loan discounts and advances
 
(3,988
)
 
(4,577
)
Accretion of discounts on debt and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
 
4,778

 
4,856

Amortization of master repurchase agreements deferred issuance costs
 
2,018

 
410

Provision for loan losses
 
(1,004
)
 
1,726

Provision for uncollectible advances
 
12,683

 
4,900

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment and intangible assets
 
18,644

 
16,333

Non-Residual Trusts losses (gains) on real estate owned, net
 
183

 
(1,642
)
Other losses (gains) on real estate owned, net
 
(932
)
 
248

Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
 
8,926

 
(11,447
)
Share-based compensation
 
3,493

 
2,690

Purchases and originations of residential loans held for sale
 
(3,583,548
)
 
(433,017
)
Proceeds from sales of and payments on residential loans held for sale
 
4,039,387

 
227,701

Net gains on sales of loans
 
(104,034
)
 
(78,445
)
Other
 
302

 
1,635

 
 
 
 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities
 
 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in receivables
 
44,223

 
(9,092
)
Increase in servicer and protective advances
 
(31,255
)
 
(9,226
)
Decrease (increase) in other assets
 
382

 
(4,440
)
Increase (decrease) in payables and accrued liabilities
 
(59,906
)
 
54,505

Decrease in servicer payables
 
(7,394
)
 
(897
)
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
 
407,552

 
(209,597
)
 
 
 
 
 

7



Investing activities
 
 
 
 
Purchases and originations of reverse loans held for investment
 
(323,132
)
 
(1,064,484
)
Principal payments received on reverse loans held for investment
 
100,729

 
52,255

Principal payments received on forward loans related to Residual Trusts
 
24,139

 
25,970

Principal payments received on forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
14,631

 
15,225

Payments received on receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
3,230

 
4,141

Cash proceeds from sales of real estate owned, net related to Residual Trusts
 
3,536

 
1,466

Cash proceeds from sales of other real estate owned, net
 
7,900

 
4,590

Purchases of premises and equipment
 
(4,524
)
 
(5,240
)
Decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
4,703

 
570

Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
 
(41,912
)
 
(478,084
)
Acquisitions of servicing rights
 
8,843

 
(304,990
)
Other
 
(450
)
 
138

Cash flows used in investing activities
 
(202,307
)
 
(1,748,443
)
 
 
 
 
 
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of debt issuance costs
 

 
813,744

Payments on debt
 
(4,573
)
 
(19,620
)
Proceeds from securitizations of reverse loans
 
445,046

 
1,041,754

Payments on HMBS related obligations
 
(117,731
)
 
(57,730
)
Issuances of servicing advance liabilities
 
262,870

 
404,553

Payments on servicing advance liabilities
 
(237,689
)
 
(261,774
)
Net change in master repurchase agreements related to forward loans
 
(361,909
)
 
246,183

Net change in master repurchase agreements related to reverse loans
 
(72,339
)
 
27,682

Other debt issuance costs paid
 
(5,278
)
 
(4,135
)
Payments on mortgage-backed debt related to Residual Trusts
 
(26,105
)
 
(27,600
)
Payments on mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(19,383
)
 
(21,865
)
Other
 
2,665

 
(481
)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
 
(134,426
)
 
2,140,711

 
 
 
 
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
70,819

 
182,671

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
 
491,885

 
442,054

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
 
$
562,704

 
$
624,725

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

8



WALTER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
Walter Investment Management Corp., or the Company or Walter Investment, is a fee-based business services provider to the residential mortgage industry focused on providing primary and specialty servicing for credit-sensitive residential mortgages and reverse mortgages. The Company also originates, purchases, and sells mortgage loans into the secondary market. In addition, the Company is a mortgage portfolio owner of credit-challenged, non-conforming residential loans and reverse mortgage loans and operates an insurance agency serving residential loan borrowers. The Company operates throughout the United States, or U.S. At March 31, 2014, the Company serviced approximately 2.3 million accounts compared to 2.1 million accounts at December 31, 2013.
References to “residential loans” refer to residential mortgage loans, including forward mortgage loans, reverse mortgage loans and residential retail installment agreements, which include manufactured housing loans. References to “borrowers” refer to borrowers under residential mortgage loans and installment obligors under residential retail installment agreements. Forward mortgage loans and residential retail installment agreements are collectively referred to as “forward loans” or “forward mortgages.” Reverse mortgage loans, including Home Equity Conversion Mortgages, or HECMs, are referred to as “reverse loans” or “reverse mortgages.”
2014 Acquisitions
Acquisition of Certain Net Assets of EverBank Financial Corp
On October 30, 2013, the Company entered into a series of definitive agreements to purchase (1) certain private and government sponsored entity, or GSE or GSE-backed, mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs, and related servicer advances, (2) sub-servicing rights for forward loans and (3) a default servicing platform from EverBank Financial Corp, or Everbank. Investor approvals to transfer servicing were obtained during the three months ended March 31, 2014, while some private investor approvals remain pending. The addition of EverBank's default platform and employees to the Company's existing platform will augment both the Company's product capabilities and capacity as well as extend its geographic diversity as it continues to execute on the significant opportunities for growth available in the specialty mortgage sector. The Company is accounting for this transaction as a business combination upon the closing of the default servicing platform which occurred on May 1, 2014.
MSR Purchase
On December 10, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with an affiliate of a national bank to acquire a pool of Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, MSRs and related servicer advances. Investor approval to transfer servicing was obtained during the three months ended March 31, 2014. This acquisition was accounted for as an asset purchase.
Interim Financial Reporting
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and related notes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s material estimates and assumptions primarily arise from risks and uncertainties associated with interest rate volatility, prepayment volatility, credit exposure, and borrower mortality rates and include, but are not limited to, the allowance for loan losses as well as the valuation of residential loans, receivables, servicing rights, goodwill and intangible assets, real estate owned, derivatives, curtailment liability, mortgage-backed debt, and Home Equity Conversion Mortgage-Backed Securities, or HMBS, related obligations. Although management is not currently aware of any factors that would significantly change its estimates and assumptions in the near term, actual results may differ from these estimates.

9



Changes in Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations is included as a component of revenues on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income in order to better reflect the economics of the Company’s Reverse Mortgage segment as a significant and growing part of the Company’s operations. Previously, the Company included fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations as a component of other gains (losses).
The provision for loan losses associated with the Company's residential loans carried at amortized cost is now included in other expenses, net on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Accounting for Certain Purchased Servicing Rights
At December 31, 2012 and during the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company purchased MSR portfolios as part of certain business combination and asset purchase transactions. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company, in consultation with its advisors, made a correction to its accounting for servicing rights and related intangible assets. There was no significant impact on previously reported net income, earnings per share, stockholders’ equity, or net cash provided by or used in operating activities as a result of this change. The Company concluded that the impact was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2012 or for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
At March 31, 2013, the value assigned to these acquired portfolios was reflected in servicing rights, net and intangible assets, net. Effective with the change, the entire value is now reflected in servicing rights, net. As a result, servicing rights, net increased and intangible assets, net decreased by $412.4 million at March 31, 2013.
The disclosures related to servicing rights and intangible assets reflect these corrections, including the revision of certain market data assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these servicing rights. The previously disclosed estimate of intangible asset amortization expected to be expensed in future periods as disclosed in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 is now reflected in net servicing revenue and fees as a realization of expected cash flows for the related servicing rights; however, the timing of recognition may differ as the intangible amortization model differs from the servicing rights fair value measurement model.
Recent Accounting Guidance
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued an accounting standards update that specifies that unrecognized tax benefits should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. When a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes, or if the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The Company has adopted the amendments in this standard effective in the first quarter of 2014. Adoption of this standard had no significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that clarifies the definition of an in-substance repossession and foreclosure, and requires additional disclosures related to these items. These amendments reduce diversity in practice by clarifying when an in-substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The required disclosures under these new amendments require interim and annual disclosures of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure. The amendments in this standard are effective for the annual periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 is a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies.

10



3. Acquisitions
EverBank Net Assets
On October 30, 2013, the Company entered into a series of definitive agreements to purchase (1) certain private and GSE-backed MSRs and related servicer advances, (2) sub-servicing rights for forward loans and (3) a default servicing platform from EverBank, collectively the EverBank net assets. The agreements were structured such that ownership of the MSRs and related servicer advances and the sub-servicing rights for forward loans would transfer to the Company as investor consents were received and the net assets associated with the default servicing platform would transfer when the data associated with the loans underlying the MSRs were boarded onto the Company’s servicing systems.
The agreements called for an estimated total purchase price of $83.4 million for the MSRs, less net cash flows received on the underlying loans between October 30, 2013 and the date of legal transfer; and an additional $1.9 million associated with the default servicing platform. The Company paid $16.7 million of the estimated purchase price on October 30, 2013.
The Company is accounting for this transaction as a business combination in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance upon closing of the default servicing platform. As the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are expected to transfer at several dates, acquired assets and assumed liabilities will be recorded on the date the transfer to the Company occurs.
During March 2014, the Company received approvals to transfer MSRs and sub-servicing rights with unpaid principal balance of approximately $16.5 billion . Accordingly, the Company paid an additional $44.7 million and recorded MSRs at fair value of $58.7 million . Approvals for certain private investor-backed MSRs have not been received and accordingly, no assets or related revenues and expenses have been recorded.
Closing of the default servicing platform occurred on May 1, 2014; however, due to the limited time since closing, the Company is unable to provide actual amounts recognized related to the EverBank net assets as the accounting for the purchase price allocation has not yet been completed. As a result, certain required disclosures relative to the EverBank net assets acquired, including those related to any goodwill or bargain purchase amounts to be recognized, have not been made.
MSR Purchase
On December 10, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with an affiliate of a national bank to acquire a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs and related servicer advances for an estimated purchase price of $330.0 million for the MSRs, less net cash flows received on the underlying loans between December 10, 2013 and the date of legal transfer. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company closed on the agreement upon receipt of investor approval to transfer servicing, at which time the unpaid principal balance of the loans was $27.6 billion . The Company paid $165.0 million and $73.2 million of the estimated total purchase price of $330.0 million in December 2013 and April 2014, respectively. The remaining purchase price will be paid during 2014.
4. Variable Interest Entities
Securitization trusts that the Company consolidates and in which it holds a residual interest are referred to as the Residual Trusts. Securitization trusts that have been consolidated and in which the Company does not hold residual interests are referred to as the Non-Residual Trusts.
Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
Residual Trusts
The Company historically funded its residential loan portfolio through securitizations and evaluated each securitization trust to determine if it met the definition of a variable interest entity, or VIE, and whether the Company was required to consolidate the trust. The Company determined that it is the primary beneficiary of 12 securitization trusts in which it owns residual interests, and as a result, has consolidated these trusts. As a holder of the residual securities issued by the trusts, the Company has both the obligation to absorb losses to the extent of its investment and the right to receive benefits from the trusts, both of which could potentially be significant to the trusts. In addition, as the servicer for these trusts, the Company concluded it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts through its ability to manage the delinquent assets of the trusts. Specifically, the Company has discretion, subject to applicable contractual provisions and consistent with prudent mortgage-servicing practices, to decide whether to sell or work out any loans that become troubled.

11



The Company is not contractually required to provide any financial support to the Residual Trusts. The Company may, from time to time at its sole discretion, purchase certain assets from the trusts to cure delinquency or loss triggers for the sole purpose of releasing excess overcollateralization to the Company. Based on current performance trends, the Company does not expect to provide financial support to the Residual Trusts .
Non-Residual Trusts
The Company determined that it is the primary beneficiary of 10 securitization trusts for which it does not own any residual interests. The Company does not receive economic benefit from the residential loans while the loans are held by the Non-Residual Trusts other than the servicing fees paid to the Company to service the loans. However, as part of a prior agreement to acquire the rights to service the loans in these securitization trusts, the Company has certain obligations to exercise mandatory clean-up calls for each of these trusts at their earliest exercisable dates, which is the date each loan pool falls to 10% of the original principal amount. The Company will take control of the remaining collateral in the trusts when these calls are exercised, thus the clean-up call is deemed a variable interest as the Company will be required under this obligation to absorb any losses of the trusts subsequent to these calls, which could potentially be significant to each trust. Additionally, as servicer of these trusts, the Company has concluded that it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts.
The Company is not contractually required to provide any financial support to the Non-Residual Trusts. However, as described above, the Company is obligated to exercise the mandatory clean-up call obligations it assumed as part of the agreement to acquire the rights to service the loans in these trusts. The Company expects to call these securitizations beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019 . The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the various respective call dates is $417.4 million .
For 7 of the 10 Non-Residual Trusts and 4 securitization trusts that have not been consolidated, the Company, as part of an agreement to service the loans in all 11 trusts, also has an obligation to reimburse a third party for the final $165.0 million in letters of credit, or LOCs, if drawn, which were issued to the 11 trusts by a third party as credit enhancements to these trusts. As the LOCs were provided as credit enhancements to these securitizations, the trusts draw on these LOCs if there are insufficient cash flows from the underlying collateral to pay the debt holders. The total amount available on these LOCs for all 11 securitization trusts was $271.2 million and $273.6 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. Based on the Company’s estimates of the underlying performance of the collateral in these securitizations, the Company does not expect that the final $165.0 million will be drawn, and therefore, no liability for the fair value of this obligation has been recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets; however, actual performance may differ from this estimate in the future. For further information on the four securitization trusts that have not been consolidated by the Company, refer to the Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities section of this Note.
Servicer and Protective Advance Financing Facilities
Servicer and Protective Advance Financing Trust
In January 2014, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into an Indenture Agreement whereby it transfers certain servicer and protective advances to a statutory trust, or the Trust. A portion of the advances transferred are financed by the Trust through the issuance of various classes of funding notes collateralized by the transferred advances. The principal and interest payments on the funding notes are paid from the recoveries or repayment of the underlying advances. Accordingly, the timing of principal payments is dependent on the recoveries or repayments received on the underlying advances collateralizing the funding notes.  As the Trust is engaged in operating activities which are restricted to financing servicer advances, it is deemed to be a VIE.  A subsidiary of the Company which services the mortgage loans to which the transferred servicer and protective advances relate has the power to direct the activities most significant to the economic performance of the Trust, as well as the obligation to absorb losses which could potentially be significant to the Trust, and thereby consolidates the Trust.
The advances pledged under the Indenture Agreement are recorded as servicer and protective advances, net while the amount of obligations to holders of the funding notes is recorded as servicing advance liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The assets of the Trust are pledged as collateral to satisfy the obligations under the Indenture Agreement. Those obligations are not cross-collateralized and the holders of the funding notes do not have recourse to the Company. Refer to Note 15 for additional information regarding the Indenture Agreement.
Servicer and Protective Advance Financing Subsidiary
A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, or the Subsidiary, engages in operating activities that are restricted to the purchase of servicer and protective advances from certain of the Subsidiary’s affiliates and assignment of those advances to various lenders under a financing agreement with a third-party agent. Due to these restrictions, the Subsidiary is deemed to be a VIE and the Company is deemed both to have the power to direct the activities most significant to the economic performance of the Subsidiary, as well as the obligation to absorb losses or receive residual returns, which could be potentially significant to the Subsidiary.

12



The assets and liabilities of the Subsidiary represent servicer and protective advances purchased from affiliates and obligations to lenders under a financing agreement, or the Receivables Loan Agreement. The amount of purchased advances under the Receivables Loan Agreement is recorded as servicer and protective advances, net while the amount of obligations to lenders under the Receivables Loan Agreement is recorded as servicing advance liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The assets of the Subsidiary are pledged as collateral to satisfy the obligations of lenders under the Receivables Loan Agreement. Those obligations are not cross-collateralized and the lenders do not have recourse to the Company. Refer to Note 15 for additional information regarding the Receivables Loan Agreement.
Included in the tables below are summaries of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs (in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
 
Residual
Trusts
 
Non-Residual
Trusts
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advance
Financing
Facilities
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$

 
$

 
$
59

 
$
59

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
45,480

 
14,170

 
8,645

 
68,295

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,361,010

 

 

 
1,361,010

Residential loans at fair value
 

 
569,097

 

 
569,097

Receivables at fair value
 

 
39,328

 

 
39,328

Servicer and protective advances, net
 

 

 
101,466

 
101,466

Other assets
 
48,441

 
1,115

 
282

 
49,838

Total assets
 
$
1,454,931

 
$
623,710

 
$
110,452

 
$
2,189,093

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
7,766

 
$

 
$
46

 
$
7,812

Servicing advance liabilities
 

 

 
97,675

 
97,675

Mortgage-backed debt
 
1,177,001

 
667,536

 

 
1,844,537

Total liabilities
 
$
1,184,767

 
$
667,536

 
$
97,721

 
$
1,950,024

 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Residual
Trusts
 
Non-Residual
Trusts
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advance
Financing
Facilities
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
$
44,995

 
$
13,086

 
$
999

 
$
59,080

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,377,711

 

 

 
1,377,711

Residential loans at fair value
 

 
587,265

 

 
587,265

Receivables at fair value
 

 
43,545

 

 
43,545

Servicer and protective advances, net
 

 

 
75,481

 
75,481

Other assets
 
54,544

 
1,302

 
408

 
56,254

Total assets
 
$
1,477,250

 
$
645,198

 
$
76,888

 
$
2,199,336

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
8,391

 
$

 
$
81

 
$
8,472

Servicing advance liabilities
 

 

 
67,905

 
67,905

Mortgage-backed debt
 
1,203,084

 
684,778

 

 
1,887,862

Total liabilities
 
$
1,211,475

 
$
684,778

 
$
67,986

 
$
1,964,239


13



The assets of the consolidated VIEs are pledged as collateral to the servicing advance liabilities and mortgage-backed debt and are not available to satisfy claims of general creditors of the Company. The mortgage-backed debt issued by each consolidated securitization trust is to be satisfied solely from the proceeds of the residential loans and other collateral held in the trusts while the servicing advance liabilities are to be satisfied from the recoveries or repayments from the underlying advances. The consolidated VIEs are not cross-collateralized and the holders of the mortgage-backed debt issued by the trusts and lenders and holders of funding notes under the servicer and protective advance financing facilities do not have recourse to the Company. Refer to Note 17 for additional information regarding the mortgage-backed debt and related collateral and Note 15 for additional information regarding servicing advance liabilities.
For the Residual Trusts, interest income earned on the residential loans and interest expense incurred on the mortgage-backed debt, both of which are carried at amortized cost, are recorded on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income in interest income on loans and interest expense, respectively. Additionally, the Company records its estimate of probable incurred credit losses associated with the residential loans as provision for loan losses which is included in other expenses, net, on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Interest receipts on residential loans and interest payments on mortgage-backed debt are included in operating activities, while principal payments on residential loans are included in investing activities and payments on mortgage-backed debt are included in financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
For the Non-Residual Trusts, the change in fair value of residential loans, receivables, net and mortgage-backed debt, all of which are carried at fair value, are included in other net fair value losses on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Included in other net fair value losses is the interest income that is expected to be collected on the residential loans, the interest expense that is expected to be paid on the mortgage-backed debt, as well as the accretion of the fair value adjustments. Accordingly, the servicing fee that the Company expects to earn for servicing the assets of the Non-Residual Trusts is recognized in other net fair value losses as a component of the recognition of the expected interest income on the loans. The non-cash component of other net fair value losses is recognized as an adjustment in reconciling net income or loss to the net cash provided by or used in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Principal payments on residential loans and draws on receivables, net are included in investing activities while payments on mortgage-backed debt are included in financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Interest expense associated with the servicer and protective advance financing facilities is included in interest expense on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Changes in servicer and protective advances are included in operating activities while the issuances of and payments on servicing advance liabilities are included in financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Company has variable interests in VIEs that it does not consolidate as it has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs.
Servicing Arrangements with Letter of Credit Reimbursement Obligation
As part of an agreement to service the loans in 11 securitization trusts, 7 of which have been consolidated as described in the Consolidated VIEs section above, the Company has an obligation to reimburse a third party for the final $165.0 million in LOCs if drawn. The LOCs were issued by a third party as credit enhancements to these 11 securitizations and, accordingly, the securitization trusts will draw on these LOCs if there are insufficient cash flows from the underlying collateral to pay the debt holders.
As noted above, the Company has determined that for seven of these securitization trusts, the Company is the primary beneficiary due to a mandatory clean-up call obligation related to these trusts and, accordingly, the Company has consolidated the seven trusts on the consolidated balance sheets. However, for the four remaining securitization trusts for which the Company does not have a mandatory clean-up call obligation, the Company’s involvement consists only of servicer and the LOC reimbursement obligation. As explained in the Consolidated VIEs section above, the Company does not expect that the final $165.0 million in LOCs will be drawn. As the Company’s only involvement is that of servicer and the LOC reimbursement obligation, which is not expected to be drawn, the Company has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the trusts as it does not have a variable interest that could potentially be significant to the trusts. Accordingly, the four securitization trusts have not been consolidated on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

14



Other Servicing Arrangements
The Company is involved with other securitization trusts as servicer of the financial assets of the trusts. The Company’s servicing fees are anticipated to absorb more than an insignificant portion of the returns of the trusts and the Company has considered its contract to service the financial assets of the trusts a variable interest. Typically, the Company’s involvement as servicer allows it to control the activities of the trusts that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts, however, based on the nature of the trusts, the obligations to its beneficial interest holders are guaranteed. Further, the Company’s involvement as servicer is subject to substantive kick-out rights held by a single party, and there are no significant barriers to the exercise of those kick-out rights. As a result, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of those trusts and those trusts are not consolidated on the Company’s balance sheets. The termination of the Company as servicer to the financial assets of the trusts would eliminate any future servicing revenues and related cash flows associated with the underlying financial assets held by the trusts.
The following table presents the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets that relate to its variable interests in the VIEs that are not consolidated, as well as its maximum exposure to loss and the amount of assets serviced by the Company which is represented by the unpaid principal balance of the total assets of these unconsolidated VIEs (in thousands):
 
 
Carrying Value of Assets
Recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance of Total
Assets of
Unconsolidated
VIEs
Type of Involvement
 
Servicing
Rights, Net
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advances, Net
 
Receivables, Net
 
Total
 
Maximum
Exposure to
Loss
 (1)
 
Servicing arrangements with a letter of credit reimbursement obligation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
$
1,740

 
$
2,448

 
$
155

 
$
4,343

 
$
169,343

 
$
191,681

December 31, 2013
 
1,845

 
2,500

 
160

 
4,505

 
169,505

 
197,338

Other servicing arrangements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2014
 

 

 
187

 
187

 
187

 
438,335

December 31, 2013
 

 

 
181

 
181

 
181

 
430,013

__________
(1) The Company's maximum exposure to loss related to these unconsolidated VIEs equals the carrying value of assets recognized on the consolidated balance sheets plus the obligation to reimburse a third party for the final $165.0 million drawn on LOCs discussed above, in the case of servicing arrangements with a letter of credit reimbursement obligation. The LOCs are associated with 11 securitization trusts, 7 of which are consolidated. Refer to additional information in the Consolidated Variable Interest Entities section above.
5. Transfers of Residential Loans
Transfers of Forward Loans
As part of its origination activities, the Company transfers, substantially all to Fannie Mae, forward loans it originates or purchases from third parties. The forward loans originated or purchased and subsequently transferred are conventional conforming mortgages which have been underwritten to the guidelines established by Fannie Mae. Securitization usually occurs within 20 days of loan closing or purchase in the form of mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae, which are sold to third-party investors. The Company accounts for these transfers as sales and generally retains the servicing rights associated with the transferred loans. The Company receives a servicing fee for servicing the transferred loans, which represents continuing involvement.
The Company has elected to measure forward loans held for sale at fair value. The gains and losses on the transfer of forward loans held for sale are included in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Also included in net gains on sales of loans is interest income earned during the period the loans were held, changes in the fair value of loans, and the gain or loss on the related freestanding derivatives. Refer to Note 7 for information on these freestanding derivatives, which include interest rate lock commitments, or IRLCs, forward sales of agency to-be-announced securities, or forward sales commitments, and mortgage-backed securities, or MBS, purchase commitments. All activity related to forward loans held for sale and the related freestanding derivatives are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

15



The following table presents a summary of cash flows related to transfers of forward loans accounted for as sales (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Proceeds received from transfers, net of fees
$
4,047,743

 
$
124,053

Servicing fees collected  (1)
11,117

 
21

__________
(1)
Represents servicing fees collected on all loans transferred with servicing retained.
In connection with these transfers, the Company recorded servicing rights with an initial fair value of $52.6 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. All servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value using a Level 3 measurement technique. Refer to Note 12 for information relating to servicing of residential loans.
Certain guarantees arise from agreements associated with the sale of the Company's residential loans. Under these agreements, the Company may be obligated to repurchase loans, or otherwise indemnify or reimburse the investor or insurer for losses incurred, due to material breach of contractual representations and warranties. Refer to Note 24 for further information. The following table presents the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets that relate to its continued involvement with forward loans that have been transferred with servicing rights retained and the unpaid principal balance of these transferred loans (in thousands):
 
 
Carrying Value of Assets
Recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance of
Transferred
Loans
Type of Involvement
 
Servicing
Rights, Net
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advances, Net
 
Receivables,
Net
 
Total
 
Servicing arrangements associated with transfers of forward loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
$
226,958

 
$
3,376

 
$
556

 
$
230,890

 
$
18,287,357

December 31, 2013
 
192,962

 
6,023

 
437

 
199,422

 
14,672,986

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $20.5 million and $9.1 million , respectively, in transferred forward loans serviced by the Company were 60 days or more past due.
Transfers of Reverse Loans
The Company, through its subsidiary, Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., or RMS, is an approved issuer of Government National Mortgage Association, or Ginnie Mae, HMBS. The HMBS are guaranteed by Ginnie Mae and collateralized by participation interests in HECMs insured by the Federal Housing Administration, or FHA. The Company both originates and acquires HECMs. The loans are then pooled and securitized into HMBS that the Company sells into the secondary market with servicing rights retained. Based upon the structure of the Ginnie Mae securitization program, the Company has determined that it has not met all of the requirements for sale accounting and accounts for these transfers as secured borrowings. Under this accounting treatment, the reverse loans remain on the consolidated balance sheets as residential loans. The proceeds from the transfer of reverse loans are recorded as HMBS related obligations with no gain or loss recognized on the transfer. Ginnie Mae, as guarantor of the HMBS, is obligated to the holders of the HMBS in an instance of RMS default on its servicing obligations, or when the proceeds realized on HECMs are insufficient to repay all outstanding HMBS related obligations. Ginnie Mae has recourse to RMS to the extent of the collateralized participation interests in the HECMs, but does not have recourse to the general assets of the Company, except for obligations as servicer.
The Company elects to measure reverse loans and HMBS related obligations at fair value. The change in fair value of the reverse loans and HMBS related obligations are included in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Also included in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations is the contractual interest income earned on the reverse loans and the contractual interest expense incurred on the HMBS related obligations in addition to fair value gains on reverse loans originated and additional participations issued. Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations are recognized as an adjustment in reconciling net income or loss to the net cash provided by or used in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Purchases and originations of and repayment of principal received on reverse loans held for investment are included in investing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Proceeds from securitizations of reverse loans and payments on HMBS related obligations are included in financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

16



At March 31, 2014, the unpaid principal balance and the carrying value associated with both the reverse loans and the real estate owned pledged as collateral to the securitization pools were $8.3 billion and $9.1 billion , respectively. HMBS related obligations at fair value were $9.2 billion at March 31, 2014 .
6. Fair Value
Basis or Measurement
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The accounting guidance concerning fair value allows the Company to elect to measure financial instruments at fair value and report the changes in fair value through net income or loss. This election can only be made at certain specified dates and is irrevocable once made. Other than forward loans held for sale, all of which the Company has elected to measure at fair value, the Company does not have a fair value election policy, but rather makes the election on an instrument-by-instrument basis as assets and liabilities are acquired or incurred, other than for those assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded and subsequently measured at fair value. In addition, through business combinations, the Company recognized contingent liabilities for a mandatory repurchase obligation, a professional fees liability related to certain securitizations, and contingent earn-out payments that it measures at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations.
Transfers into and out of the fair value hierarchy levels are assumed to be as of the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred. There were no transfers into or out of Level 3, and there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables summarize the assets and liabilities in each level of the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
$

 
$

 
$
9,149,579

 
$
9,149,579

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 
569,097

 
569,097

Forward loans held for sale
 

 
630,456

 

 
630,456

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 
39,328

 
39,328

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 

 

 
1,513,830

 
1,513,830

Freestanding derivative instruments
 

 
3,713

 
38,190

 
41,903

Total assets
 
$

 
$
634,169

 
$
11,310,024

 
$
11,944,193

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments
 
$

 
$
1,780

 
$
720

 
$
2,500

Mandatory repurchase obligation
 

 

 
7,937

 
7,937

Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations
 

 

 
6,228

 
6,228

Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 
667,536

 
667,536

HMBS related obligations
 

 

 
9,166,998

 
9,166,998

Total liabilities
 
$

 
$
1,780

 
$
9,849,419

 
$
9,851,199


17



 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
$

 
$

 
$
8,738,503

 
$
8,738,503

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 
587,265

 
587,265

Forward loans held for sale
 

 
1,015,607

 

 
1,015,607

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 
43,545

 
43,545

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 

 

 
1,131,124

 
1,131,124

Freestanding derivative instruments
 

 
19,534

 
42,831

 
62,365

Total assets
 
$

 
$
1,035,141

 
$
10,543,268

 
$
11,578,409

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments
 
$

 
$
2,127

 
$
3,755

 
$
5,882

Mandatory repurchase obligation
 

 

 
8,182

 
8,182

Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations
 

 

 
6,607

 
6,607

Contingent earn-out payments
 
5,900

 

 

 
5,900

Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 
684,778

 
684,778

HMBS related obligations
 

 

 
8,652,746

 
8,652,746

Total liabilities
 
$
5,900

 
$
2,127

 
$
9,356,068

 
$
9,364,095

The following assets and liabilities are measured on the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis utilizing significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions in their valuation. The following tables provide a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of these assets and liabilities (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
Fair Value
January 1,
2014
 
Acquisition of EverBank Net Assets
 
Total
Gains (Losses)
Included in
Net Income
 
Purchases
 
Issuances
 
Settlements
 
Fair Value
March 31,
2014
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
$
8,738,503

 
$

 
$
205,409

 
$
193,676

 
$
129,463

 
$
(117,472
)
 
$
9,149,579

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
587,265

 

 
10,783

 

 

 
(28,951
)
 
569,097

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
43,545

 

 
(987
)
 

 

 
(3,230
)
 
39,328

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
1,131,124

 
58,680

 
(47,634
)
 
319,047

 
52,613

 

 
1,513,830

Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
42,831

 

 
(4,641
)
 

 

 

 
38,190

Total assets
 
$
10,543,268

 
$
58,680

 
$
162,930

 
$
512,723

 
$
182,076

 
$
(149,653
)
 
$
11,310,024

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
$
(3,755
)
 
$

 
$
3,035

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(720
)
Mandatory repurchase obligation
 
(8,182
)
 

 
(242
)
 

 

 
487

 
(7,937
)
Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations
 
(6,607
)
 

 
(178
)
 

 

 
557

 
(6,228
)
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(684,778
)
 

 
(11,835
)
 

 

 
29,077

 
(667,536
)
HMBS related obligations
 
(8,652,746
)
 

 
(188,173
)
 

 
(445,046
)
 
118,967

 
(9,166,998
)
Total liabilities
 
$
(9,356,068
)
 
$

 
$
(197,393
)
 
$

 
$
(445,046
)
 
$
149,088

 
$
(9,849,419
)

18



 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Fair Value
January 1,
2013
 
Acquisition
of ResCap
Net Assets
 
Total
Gains (Losses)
Included in
Net Income
 
Purchases
 
Sales
 
Issuances
 
Settlements
 
Fair Value
March 31,
2013
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans  (1)
 
$
6,047,108

 
$

 
$
83,277

 
$
794,397

 
$
(76,169
)
 
$
308,191

 
$
(49,861
)
 
$
7,106,943

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
646,498

 

 
13,019

 

 

 

 
(32,087
)
 
627,430

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
53,975

 

 
3,837

 

 

 

 
(4,141
)
 
53,671

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
26,382

 
242,604

 
(21,075
)
 
517,742

 

 
1,290

 

 
766,943

Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
949

 

 
58,624

 

 

 

 

 
59,573

Total assets
 
$
6,774,912

 
$
242,604

 
$
137,682

 
$
1,312,139

 
$
(76,169
)
 
$
309,481

 
$
(86,089
)
 
$
8,614,560

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mandatory repurchase obligation
 
$
(9,999
)
 
$

 
$
(162
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
466

 
$
(9,695
)
Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations
 
(8,147
)
 

 
(220
)
 

 

 

 
628

 
(7,739
)
Contingent earn-out payments
 
(6,100
)
 

 
(3,694
)
 

 

 

 

 
(9,794
)
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(757,286
)
 

 
(14,005
)
 

 

 

 
32,857

 
(738,434
)
HMBS related obligations
 
(5,874,552
)
 

 
(42,017
)
 

 

 
(1,028,744
)
 
57,730

 
(6,887,583
)
Total liabilities
 
$
(6,656,084
)
 
$

 
$
(60,098
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(1,028,744
)
 
$
91,681

 
$
(7,653,245
)
_______
(1) Includes $28.5 million in reverse loans held for sale at January 1, 2013. There were no reverse loans held for sale at March 31, 2013.
All gains and losses on assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, with the exception of gains and losses on IRLCs and servicing rights carried at fair value, are recognized in either other net fair value losses or net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Gains and losses relating to IRLCs are recorded in net gains on sales of loans and changes in fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value are recorded in net servicing revenue and fees on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Total gains and losses included in net income or loss include interest income and interest expense at the stated rate for interest-bearing assets and liabilities, respectively, accretion and amortization, and the impact of changes in valuation inputs and assumptions.
The Company’s valuation committee determines and approves valuation policies and unobservable inputs used to estimate the fair value of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis, except for IRLCs and the contingent earn-out payments. The valuation committee consists of certain members of the management team responsible for accounting, treasury, servicing operations, and credit risk. The valuation committee meets on a quarterly basis to review the assets and liabilities that require fair value measurement, including how each asset and liability has actually performed in comparison to the unobservable inputs and the projected performance provided by the Company’s credit risk group. The valuation committee also reviews discount rate assumptions and related available market data. Similar procedures are followed by the Company’s asset liability committee responsible for IRLCs and a sub-set of management responsible for the contingent earn-out payments. These fair values are approved by senior management.
The following is a description of the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as the basis for classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

19



Residential loans at fair value

Reverse loans — These loans are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the loans. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the loans, including, but not limited to, assumptions for repayment, mortality, and discount rates. Collateral performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is primarily based on an assessment of current market yields on newly originated HECMs, expected duration of the asset, and current market interest rates. Weighted-average remaining life in years, conditional repayment rate, and discount rate are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts — These loans are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the loans. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the loans including, but not limited to, assumptions for prepayment, default, loss severity, and discount rates. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. Collateral performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is primarily based on the collateral and credit risk characteristics of these loans, combined with an assessment of market interest rates. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

Forward loans held for sale — These loans are valued using a market approach by utilizing observable forward to-be-announced prices of mortgage-backed securities. The Company classifies these loans as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts — The Company estimates the fair value of these receivables using Level 3 unobservable market inputs at the net present value of expected cash flows from the LOCs to be used to pay debt holders over the remaining life of the securitization trusts. The estimate of the cash to be collected from the LOCs is based on expected shortfalls of cash flows from the loans in the securitization trusts, compared to the required debt payments of the securitization trusts. The cash flows from the loans, and thus the cash to be provided by the LOCs, is determined by analyzing the credit assumptions for the underlying collateral in each of the securitizations. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is based on the risk-free market rate given the credit risk characteristics of the collateral supporting the LOCs. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts are recorded in receivables, net on the consolidated balance sheets.

Servicing rights carried at fair value — The Company accounts for servicing rights associated with the risk-managed loan class at fair value. The Company uses the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist to develop the discounted cash flow model used to estimate the fair value of its servicing rights. The model utilizes several sensitive assumptions which are reviewed and approved by the Company, the most sensitive of which are assumptions for mortgage prepayment speeds, default rates and discount rates. The Company believes these sensitive assumptions reflect those that a market participant would use in determining fair value. These assumptions are generated and applied based on collateral stratifications including product type, remittance type, geography, delinquency, and coupon dispersion. These assumptions require the use of judgment and can have a significant impact on the determination of the servicing rights’ fair value. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The Company classifies these servicing rights within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy accordingly.


20



Freestanding derivative instruments — Fair values of IRLCs are derived by using both valuation models incorporating current market information or through observation of market pricing for instruments with similar characteristics and by estimating the fair value of the servicing rights expected to be recorded at sale of the loan and are adjusted for anticipated loan funding probability. Both the fair value of servicing rights expected to be recorded at the date of sale of the loan and anticipated loan funding probability are significant unobservable inputs. IRLCs are classified as Level 3. The loan funding probability ratio represents the aggregate likelihood that loans currently in a lock position will ultimately close, which is largely dependent on the loan processing stage that a loan is currently in and changes in interest rates from the time of the rate lock through the time a loan is closed. IRLCs have positive fair value at inception and change in value as interest rates and loan funding probability change. Significant changes in loan funding probability and the servicing rights component of IRLCs, in isolation, could result in a significant change to the fair value measurement. Rising interest rates have a positive effect on the fair value of the servicing rights component of the IRLC fair value and increase the loan funding probability. An increase in loan funding probability (i.e., higher aggregate likelihood of loans estimated to close) will result in the fair value of the IRLC increasing if in a gain position, or decreasing, to a lower loss, if in a loss position. A significant increase (decrease) to the fair value of servicing rights in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
The fair value of forward sales commitments and MBS purchase commitments is determined based on observed market pricing for similar instruments; therefore, these contracts are classified as Level 2. Counterparty credit risk is taken into account when determining fair value, although the impact is diminished by daily margin posting on all forward sales and purchase derivatives.
Freestanding derivative instruments are included in either other assets or payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 7 for additional information on freestanding derivative financial instruments.
Mandatory repurchase obligation — This contingent liability relates to a mandatory obligation for the Company to repurchase loans from the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, when the loans become 90 days delinquent. The Company estimates the fair value of this obligation based on the expected net present value of expected future cash flows using Level 3 assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the liability including, but not limited to, assumptions for prepayment, default, and loss severity rates applicable to the historical and projected performance of the underlying loans. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. Collateral performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for this liability is primarily based on collateral characteristics combined with an assessment of market interest rates. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The mandatory repurchase obligation is included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations — This contingent liability primarily relates to payments for surety and broker fees that the Company will be required to make over the remaining life of certain consolidated and unconsolidated securitization trusts. The Company estimates the fair value of this liability using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of the expected cash flows of the professional fees required to be paid related to the securitization trusts. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing these liabilities including, but not limited to, estimates of collateral prepayment, default and discount rates. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. Collateral performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for this liability is primarily based on collateral characteristics combined with an assessment of market interest rates. Conditional prepayment rate and conditional default rate are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. A significant increase (decrease) to this input could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The professional fees liability related to certain securitizations is included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Contingent earn-out payments — At December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the estimated fair value of this contingent liability, which is related to the Company's acquisition of Security One Lending, or S1L, is based on the average earn-out payment under multiple outcomes as determined by a Monte-Carlo simulation, discounted to present value using credit-adjusted discount rates. The average payment outcomes calculated by the Monte-Carlo simulation were derived utilizing Level 3 unobservable inputs, the most significant of which include the assumptions for forecasted financial performance of S1L and financial performance volatility. At June 30, 2013, the Company revised its estimate of the fair value of the contingent earn-out payments to $10.9 million , the maximum earn-out, based on S1L’s performance during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Other than the payment of $5.0 million made to the prior owners of S1L during the year ended December 31, 2013, no subsequent adjustments to this liability were made and the final amount to be paid was fixed and determinable at December 31, 2013. Therefore the liability was transferred out of Level 3 and was classified

21



as Level 1 at December 31, 2013. The remaining liability recorded at December 31, 2013 was paid in February 2014. Contingent earn-out payments are included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts — This debt is not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value of the debt is based on the net present value of the projected principal and interest payments owed for the remaining life of the securitization trusts. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions and estimates for principal and interest payments on the debt. An analysis of the credit assumptions for the underlying collateral in each of the securitization trusts is performed to determine the required payments to debt holders. The assumptions that the Company believes a market participant would consider in valuing the debt include, but are not limited to, prepayment, default, loss severity, and discount rates, as well as the balance of LOCs provided as credit enhancement. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. Credit performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for this debt is primarily based on credit characteristics combined with an assessment of market interest rates. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
HMBS related obligations — This liability is not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the liability. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the liability including, but not limited to, assumptions for repayments, discount rate, and borrower mortality rates for reverse loans. The discount rate assumption for these liabilities is based on an assessment of current market yields for newly-issued HMBS, expected duration, and current market interest rates. The yield on seasoned HMBS is adjusted based on the duration of each HMBS and assuming a constant spread to the swap curve. Weighted-average remaining life in years, conditional repayment rate, and discount rate are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

22



The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow method in the fair value measurement of all Level 3 assets and liabilities included on the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis, with the exception of IRLCs for which the Company utilizes a market approach. The following table presents the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of these assets and liabilities at March 31, 2014.
 
 
Significant
Unobservable Input
(1) (2)
 
Range of Input (3)
 
Weighted
Average of Input
(3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
1.8 - 13.0
 
4.4
 
 
Conditional repayment rate
 
11.03% - 38.28%
 
21.05%
 
 
Discount rate
 
1.36% - 5.29%
 
2.81%
Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
2.24% - 3.88%
 
3.05%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.30% - 3.94%
 
2.88%
 
 
Loss severity
 
77.92% - 92.22%
 
87.69%
Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
1.96% - 3.60%
 
2.71%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.49% - 4.22%
 
3.13%
 
 
Loss severity
 
75.07% - 89.38%
 
84.82%
Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
5.8 - 10.1
 
6.6
 
 
Discount rate
 
8.44% - 18.11%
 
9.59%
 
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
4.46% - 9.41%
 
7.54%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
0.20% - 5.58%
 
2.68%
Interest rate lock commitments
 
Loan funding probability
 
1.80% - 100%
 
75.62%
 
 
Fair value of servicing rights
 
1.51 - 5.60
 
4.16
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mandatory repurchase obligation
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
4.22%
 
4.22%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
2.72%
 
2.72%
 
 
Loss severity
 
73.84%
 
73.84%
Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
1.96% - 4.54%
 
2.82%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.49% - 4.22%
 
3.14%
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
1.96% - 3.60%
 
2.71%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.49% - 4.22%
 
3.13%
 
 
Loss severity
 
75.07% - 89.38%
 
84.82%
HMBS related obligations
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
1.7 - 8.0
 
4.0
 
 
Conditional repayment rate
 
10.44% - 40.69%
 
20.70%
 
 
Discount rate
 
0.96% - 4.32%
 
2.23%
Interest rate lock commitments
 
Loan funding probability
 
15.00% - 100%
 
81.61%
 
 
Fair value of servicing rights
 
1.61 - 5.60
 
4.40
__________
(1)
Conditional repayment rate includes assumptions for both voluntary and involuntary rates as well as assumptions for the assignment of HECMs to HUD, in accordance with obligations as servicer.
(2)
Voluntary and involuntary rates have been presented as conditional prepayment rate and conditional default rates, respectively.
(3)
With the exception of loss severity and fair value of servicing rights embedded in IRLCs, all significant unobservable inputs above are based on the related unpaid principal balance of the underlying collateral, or in the case of HMBS related obligations, the balance outstanding. Loss severity is based on projected liquidations. Fair value of servicing rights embedded in IRLCs represents a multiple of the annual servicing fee.



23



Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Real estate owned, net is included on the consolidated financial statements within other assets and is measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis utilizing significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions in their valuation (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Real estate owned, net
 
$
74,380

 
$
73,573

The following table presents the significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of real estate owned, net at March 31, 2014 measured on the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
 
 
Significant
Unobservable Input
 
Range of Input
 
Weighted
Average of Input
Real estate owned, net
 
Loss severity
 
0.00% - 48.18%
 
8.83
%
At the time a residential loan becomes real estate owned, the Company records the property at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. Upon foreclosure and through liquidation, the Company evaluates the property’s fair value as compared to its carrying amount and records a valuation adjustment, which is recorded in other expenses, net on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, when the carrying amount exceeds fair value. The Company held real estate owned, net of $38.8 million , $34.5 million and $1.1 million in the Loans and Residuals, Reverse Mortgage, and Other segments, respectively, at March 31, 2014. The Company held real estate owned, net of $45.3 million , $27.0 million and $1.3 million in the Loans and Residuals, Reverse Mortgage, and Other segments, respectively, at December 31, 2013. In determining fair value, the Company either obtains appraisals or performs a review of historical severity rates of real estate owned previously sold by the Company. When utilizing historical severity rates, the properties are stratified by collateral type and/or geographical concentration and length of time held by the Company. The severity rates are reviewed for reasonableness by comparison to third-party market trends and fair value is determined by applying severity rates to the stratified population. Management approves valuations that have been determined using the historical severity rate method.
Included in other expenses, net are lower of cost or fair value adjustments of $0.4 million and less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

24



Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities that are not recorded at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis and their respective levels within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Hierarchy
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
562,704

 
$
562,704

 
Level 1
 
$
491,885

 
$
491,885

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
701,865

 
701,865

 
Level 1
 
804,803

 
804,803

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,378,445

 
1,326,069

 
Level 3
 
1,394,871

 
1,341,376

Receivables, net:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance premium receivables
 
103,369

 
98,248

 
Level 3
 
103,149

 
97,902

Other
 
128,988

 
128,988

 
Level 1
 
172,501

 
172,501

Servicer and protective advances, net
 
1,400,367

 
1,349,673

 
Level 3
 
1,381,434

 
1,332,315

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables to insurance carriers
 
71,885

 
70,939

 
Level 3
 
69,489

 
68,470

Other
 
513,011

 
513,011

 
Level 1
 
398,079

 
398,079

Servicer payables
 
626,595

 
626,595

 
Level 1
 
735,225

 
735,225

Servicing advance liabilities (1)
 
994,654

 
996,467

 
Level 3
 
970,884

 
971,286

Debt (1)
 
2,878,422

 
2,949,160

 
Level 2
 
3,314,081

 
3,408,272

Mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost (1)
 
1,164,015

 
1,165,513

 
Level 3
 
1,189,536

 
1,192,510

__________
(1)
The carrying amounts of servicing advance liabilities, debt, and mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost are net of deferred issuance costs.

The following is a description of the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis. Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, other receivables, other payables and accrued liabilities, and servicer payables — The estimated fair values of these financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to their highly-liquid or short-term nature.
Residential loans carried at amortized cost — The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of residential loans carried at amortized cost are the same as those described for forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts carried at fair value on a recurring basis.
Insurance premium receivables — The estimated fair value of these receivables is based on the net present value of the expected cash flows. The determination of fair value includes assumptions related to the underlying collateral serviced by the Company, such as delinquency and default rates, as the insurance premiums are collected as part of the borrowers’ loan payments or from the related trusts.
Servicer and protective advances, net — The estimated fair value of these advances is based on the net present value of expected cash flows. The determination of expected cash flows includes consideration of recoverability clauses in the Company’s servicing agreements, as well as assumptions related to the underlying collateral when proceeds may be used to recover these receivables.
Payables to insurance carriers — The estimated fair value of these liabilities is based on the net present value of the expected carrier payments over the life of the payables.
Servicing advance liabilities — The estimated fair value of these liabilities is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the expected life of the liabilities at estimated market rates.
Debt — The Company’s term loan, convertible debt, and senior notes are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. The estimated fair value of this debt is based on an average of broker quotes. The estimated fair values of the Company’s other debt, including master repurchase agreements, approximates their carrying amounts due to their highly-liquid or short-term nature.

25



Mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost — The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost are the same as those described for mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts carried at fair value on a recurring basis.
Fair Value Option
Other than forward loans held for sale, all of which the Company has elected to measure at fair value, the Company does not have a fair value election policy, but rather makes the election on an instrument-by-instrument basis as assets and liabilities are acquired or incurred, other than for those assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded and subsequently measured at fair value. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments, including forward loans, receivables and mortgage-backed debt related to the Non-Residual Trusts, forward loans held for sale, and reverse loans and HMBS related obligations. The fair value option was elected for these assets and liabilities as the Company believes fair value best reflects the expected future economic performance of these assets and liabilities. The yield on forward loans of the Non-Residual Trusts and reverse loans along with any change in fair value are recorded in either other net fair value losses or net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The yield on forward loans held for sale along with any change in fair value is recorded in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The yield on the loans includes recognition of interest income based on the stated interest rates of the loans that is expected to be collected as well as accretion of fair value adjustments.
Presented in the table below is the estimated fair value and unpaid principal balance of loans, receivables and debt instruments for which the Company has elected the fair value option (in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Loans and receivables at fair value under the fair value option
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans (1)
 
$
9,149,579

 
$
8,422,714

 
$
8,738,503

 
$
8,135,927

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
569,097

 
707,329

 
587,265

 
727,110

Forward loans held for sale (1)
 
630,456

 
599,790

 
1,015,607

 
976,774

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts (2)
 
39,328

 
39,711

 
43,545

 
43,988

Total
 
$
10,388,460

 
$
9,769,544

 
$
10,384,920

 
$
9,883,799

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt instruments at fair value under the fair value option
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
$
667,536

 
$
715,453

 
$
684,778

 
$
735,379

HMBS related obligations (2)
 
9,166,998

 
8,346,009

 
8,652,746

 
7,959,711

Total
 
$
9,834,534

 
$
9,061,462

 
$
9,337,524

 
$
8,695,090

__________
(1)
Includes loans that collateralize master repurchase agreements. Refer to Note 16 for further information.
(2)
For the receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts, the unpaid principal balance represents the notional amount of expected draws under the LOCs. For the HMBS related obligations, the unpaid principal balance represents the balance outstanding.
Included in forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts are loans that are 90 days or more past due that have a fair value of $1.5 million and $1.7 million , and an unpaid principal balance of $8.4 million and $9.4 million , at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Included in other net fair value losses and net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations are fair value gains and losses from instrument-specific credit risk that include changes in fair value due to changes in assumptions related to prepayments, defaults, and severity. The Company recorded fair value gains (losses) from changes in instrument-specific credit risk for forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts, reverse loans, and receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts of $0.7 million , $(5.9) million and $(1.1) million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, respectively. The Company recorded fair value gains (losses) from changes in instrument-specific credit risk for forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts, reverse loans, and receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts of $(4.7) million , $3.6 million and $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. Due to the short holding period of forward loans held for sale, related fair value gains and losses from instrument-specific credit risk are insignificant.



26



Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of net gains on sales of loans (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Realized gains on sales of loans
 
$
86,833

 
$
8,308

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on loans held for sale
 
(4,176
)
 
13,626

Net fair value gains (losses) on freestanding derivatives
 
(37,395
)
 
54,684

Capitalized servicing rights
 
52,613

 
1,290

Provision for repurchases
 
(2,186
)
 
(171
)
Interest income
 
8,345

 
788

Other
 

 
(80
)
Net gains on sales of loans
 
$
104,034

 
$
78,445

Net Fair Value Gains on Reverse Loans and Related HMBS Obligations
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Net fair value gains (losses) on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
 
 
 
Interest income on reverse loans
 
$
96,881

 
$
77,267

Change in fair value of reverse loans
 
108,528

 
1,538

Net fair value gains on reverse loans
 
205,409

 
78,805

 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense on HMBS related obligations
 
(90,560
)
 
(69,675
)
Change in fair value of HMBS related obligations
 
(97,613
)
 
27,658

Net fair value losses on HMBS related obligations
 
(188,173
)
 
(42,017
)
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
$
17,236

 
$
36,788

Other Net Fair Value Losses
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of other net fair value losses (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Other net fair value gains (losses)
 
 
 
 
Assets of Non-Residual Trusts
 
$
9,796

 
$
16,856

Liabilities of Non-Residual Trusts
 
(11,835
)
 
(14,005
)
Mandatory repurchase obligation
 
(242
)
 
(162
)
Professional fees liability related to certain securitizations
 
(178
)
 
(220
)
Contingent earn-out payments
 

 
(3,694
)
Other
 
(44
)
 
(36
)
Other net fair value losses
 
$
(2,503
)
 
$
(1,261
)

27



7. Freestanding Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company enters into commitments to originate and purchase forward loans at interest rates that are determined prior to the funding or purchase of the loan, which are referred to as IRLCs. IRLCs are considered freestanding derivatives and are recorded at fair value at inception within other assets or payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair value subsequent to inception are based on changes in the fair value of the underlying loan and changes in the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. Changes in the fair value of the IRLCs are included in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forward sales commitments, to manage exposure to interest rate risk and changes in the fair value of IRLCs and forward loans held for sale. The Company may also enter into commitments to purchase MBS purchase commitments as part of its overall hedging strategy. The Company has elected not to designate these freestanding derivatives as hedging instruments under GAAP. The fair value of these instruments are recorded in other assets or payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets with changes in the fair values included in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Cash flows related to IRLCs, forward sales commitments, and MBS purchase commitments are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
In connection with the forward sales commitments and MBS purchase commitments, the Company has entered into collateral agreements with its counterparties whereby both parties are required to maintain cash deposits in the event the fair values of the derivative financial instruments meet established thresholds, which mitigates counterparty credit risk. The right to receive cash collateral placed by the Company with its counterparties is included in other assets and the obligation to return collateral received by the Company from its counterparties is included within payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has elected to record derivative assets and liabilities and related collateral on a gross basis, even when a legally enforceable master netting arrangement exists between the Company and the derivative counterparty.
The interest rate risk management derivative transactions described above are measured in terms of the notional amount. With the exception of IRLCs, the notional amount is generally not exchanged and is used only as a basis on which interest and other payments are determined.
The following table provides the total notional or contractual amounts and related fair values of derivative assets and liabilities not designated as hedging instruments as well as cash collateral (in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Notional/
Contractual
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Notional/
Contractual
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Derivative
Assets
 
Derivative
Liabilities
 
 
Derivative
Assets
 
Derivative
Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments
 
$
1,964,474

 
$
38,190

 
$
720

 
$
2,202,638

 
$
42,831

 
$
3,755

Forward sales commitments
 
2,191,957

 
3,713

 
1,627

 
2,903,700

 
19,534

 
247

MBS purchase commitments
 
130,500

 

 
153

 
308,700

 

 
1,880

Total derivative instruments
 
 
 
$
41,903

 
$
2,500

 
 
 
$
62,365

 
$
5,882

Cash collateral
 
 
 
$
640

 
$
2,695

 
 
 
$

 
$
19,148

Derivative positions subject to netting arrangements allow the Company to net settle asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral, with the same counterparty and include all forward sale commitments, MBS purchase commitments, and cash collateral at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 included in the table above. After consideration of these netting arrangements and offsetting positions by counterparty, the total net settlement amount as it relates to these positions are asset positions of $2.2 million and $2.3 million , and liability positions of $2.3 million and $4.1 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. A master netting arrangement with one of the Company’s counterparties also allows for offsetting derivative positions and collateral against amounts associated with the master repurchase agreement with that same counterparty. At March 31, 2014 , the Company’s net derivative liability position of $1.4 million with that counterparty could be offset against any over collateralized positions associated with the master repurchase agreement to the extent available. Over collateralized positions on master repurchase agreements are not reflected as collateral in the table above.

28



Gains and losses related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are recorded as a component of net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The following table summarizes these gains and losses (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments
 
$
(1,606
)
 
$
58,621

Losses on forward sales commitments
 
(35,856
)
 
(3,937
)
Gains on MBS purchase commitments
 
67

 

Net fair value gains (losses) on derivatives
 
$
(37,395
)
 
$
54,684

8. Residential Loans at Amortized Cost, Net
Residential loans at amortized cost, net consist of forward loans held for investment. The majority of these residential loans are held in securitization trusts that have been consolidated. Refer to Note 4 for further information regarding VIEs.
Residential loans at amortized cost, net are comprised of the following types of loans (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Forward loans in Residual Trusts
 
$
1,361,010

 
$
1,377,711

Unencumbered forward loans
 
17,435

 
17,160

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
$
1,378,445

 
$
1,394,871

Residential loans at amortized cost, net are comprised of the following components (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Residential loans, principal balance
 
$
1,521,166

 
$
1,542,056

Unamortized premiums (discounts) and other cost basis adjustments, net (1)
 
(130,637
)
 
(132,865
)
Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,084
)
 
(14,320
)
Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
$
1,378,445

 
$
1,394,871

__________
(1)
Included in unamortized premiums (discounts) and other cost-basis adjustments, net is $11.8 million and $12.8 million of accrued interest receivable at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Residential Loans at Amortized Cost and the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable incurred credit losses inherent in the residential loan portfolio carried at amortized cost as of the balance sheet date. This portfolio is made up of one segment and class that consists primarily of less-than prime, credit-challenged residential loans. The risk characteristics of the portfolio segment and class relate to credit exposure. The method for monitoring and assessing credit risk is the same throughout the portfolio.
Residential loans carried at amortized cost are homogeneous and evaluated collectively for impairment. The determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses is based on, but not limited to, delinquency levels, default frequency experience, prior loan loss severity experience, and management’s judgment and assumptions regarding various matters, including the composition of the residential loan portfolio, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, the estimated value of the underlying real estate collateral, the level of the allowance in relation to total loans and to historical loss levels, current economic and market conditions within the applicable geographic areas surrounding the underlying real estate, changes in unemployment levels, and the impact that changes in interest rates have on a borrower’s ability to refinance its loan and to meet its repayment obligations. Management evaluates these assumptions and various other relevant factors impacting credit quality and inherent losses when quantifying the Company’s exposure to credit losses and assessing the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses as of each reporting date. The level of the allowance is adjusted based on the results of management’s analysis. Generally, as residential loans season, the credit exposure is reduced, resulting in decreasing provisions.

29



The allowance for loan losses is highly correlated to unemployment levels, delinquency status of the portfolio, and changes in home prices within the Company’s geographic markets. There has been a steady improvement in market conditions including an increase in median home selling prices and lower levels of housing inventory. Additionally, the unemployment rate has continued to stabilize since reaching a peak in October 2009. With continued stabilization in economic trends and portfolio performance, the Company expects continued improvement in the credit quality of the residential loan portfolio.
While the Company considers the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used by management in determining the allowance for loan losses.
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses on residential loans at amortized cost, net (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of the period
 
$
14,320

 
$
20,435

Provision for loan losses  (1)
 
(1,004
)
 
1,726

Charge-offs, net of recoveries (2)
 
(1,232
)
 
(2,229
)
Balance at end of the period
 
$
12,084

 
$
19,932

__________
(1)
Provision for loan losses is included in other expense, net on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(2)
Includes charge-offs recognized upon acquisition of real estate in satisfaction of residential loans of $1.1 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The following table summarizes the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in residential loans at amortized cost by basis of accounting (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Allowance for loan losses
 
 
 
 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
10,475

 
$
13,058

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment and acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
1,609

 
1,262

Total
 
$
12,084

 
$
14,320

 
 
 
 
 
Recorded investment in residential loans at amortized cost
 
 
 
 
  Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
1,364,838

 
$
1,383,252

  Loans collectively evaluated for impairment and acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
25,691

 
25,939

Total
 
$
1,390,529

 
$
1,409,191

  Aging of Past Due Residential Loans
Residential loans at amortized cost are placed on non-accrual status when any portion of the principal or interest is 90 days past due. When placed on non-accrual status, the related interest receivable is reversed against interest income of the current period. Interest income on non-accrual loans, if received, is recorded using the cash-basis method of accounting. Residential loans are removed from non-accrual status when there is no longer significant uncertainty regarding collection of the principal and the associated interest. If a non-accrual loan is returned to accruing status, the accrued interest existing at the date the residential loan is placed on non-accrual status and interest during the non-accrual period are recorded as interest income as of the date the loan no longer meets the non-accrual criteria. The past due or delinquency status of residential loans is generally determined based on the contractual payment terms. In the case of loans with an approved repayment plan, including plans approved by the bankruptcy court, delinquency is based on the modified due date of the loan. Loan balances are charged off when it becomes evident that balances are not collectible. 

30



The following table presents the aging of the residential loan portfolio accounted for at amortized cost, net (in thousands):
 
 
30-59
Days Past
Due
 
60-89
Days Past
Due
 
90 Days
or More
Past Due
 
Total
Past Due
 
Current
 
Total
Residential
Loans
 
Non-
Accrual
Loans
Recorded investment in residential loans at amortized cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
$
12,596

 
$
5,590

 
$
51,517

 
$
69,703

 
$
1,320,826

 
$
1,390,529

 
$
51,517

December 31, 2013
 
18,798

 
7,186

 
54,836

 
80,820

 
1,328,371

 
1,409,191

 
54,836

Credit Risk Profile Based on Delinquencies
Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality and minimizing loan losses include sound loan underwriting, monitoring of existing loans, early identification of problem loans, timely resolution of problems, an appropriate allowance for loan losses, and sound non-accrual and charge-off policies. The Company primarily utilizes delinquency status to monitor the credit quality of the portfolio. The Company increases its monitoring of residential loans when the loans become delinquent. The Company considers all loans 30 days or more past due to be non-performing. The classification of delinquencies, and thus the non-performing calculation, excludes from delinquent amounts those accounts that have an approved repayment plan and are paying their mortgage payments in contractual compliance with the plan.
The following table presents the recorded investment in residential loans accounted for at amortized cost by credit quality indicator (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Performing
 
$
1,320,826

 
$
1,328,371

Non-performing
 
69,703

 
80,820

Total
 
$
1,390,529

 
$
1,409,191


9. Residential Loans at Fair Value
Residential loans at fair value are comprised of the following types of loans (in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Reverse loans
 
$
9,149,579

 
$
8,738,503

Forward loans in Non-Residual Trusts
 
569,097

 
587,265

Forward loans held for sale
 
630,456

 
1,015,607

Residential loans at fair value
 
$
10,349,132

 
$
10,341,375

Residential Loans Held for Investment
Residential loans held for investment and carried at fair value include reverse loans and forward loans in Non-Residual Trusts. The Company purchased reverse loans to be held for investment in the amount of $193.7 million and $795.3 million and originated $129.4 million and $270.1 million in reverse loans held for investment during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Residential Loans Held for Sale
The Company sells or securitizes forward loans it originates or purchases from third parties generally in the form of mortgage-backed securities that are guaranteed by Fannie Mae. The Company accounts for these transfers as sales and typically retains the right to service the loans. Refer to Note 5 for additional information regarding these transfers of residential loans.

31



A reconciliation of the changes in residential loans held for sale to the amounts presented on the consolidated statements of cash flows is presented in the following table (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
1,015,607

 
$
45,065

Purchases and originations of loans held for sale
 
3,583,548

 
433,017

Proceeds from sales of and payments on loans held for sale (1)
 
(4,059,701
)
 
(227,461
)
Realized gains on sales of loans (2)
 
86,833

 
8,308

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on loans held for sale (2)
 
(4,176
)
 
13,626

Interest income (2)
 
8,345

 
788

Transfers from loans held for investment
 

 
5,140

Other
 

 
(9
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
630,456

 
$
278,474

_______  
(1)
Realized gains (losses) on hedging activities were $(20.3) million and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(2)
Amount is a component of net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Refer to Note 6 for additional information.

10. Receivables, Net
Receivables, net consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Insurance premium receivables
 
$
103,369

 
$
103,149

Servicing fee receivables
 
59,993

 
54,794

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
39,328

 
43,545

Income tax receivables
 
26,731

 
53,495

Other receivables
 
45,753

 
67,126

Total receivables
 
275,174

 
322,109

Less: Allowance for uncollectible receivables
 
(3,489
)
 
(2,914
)
Receivables, net
 
$
271,685

 
$
319,195


11. Servicer and Protective Advances, Net
Service and protective advances, net consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Servicer advances
 
$
59,019

 
$
53,473

Protective advances
 
1,401,850

 
1,380,199

Total servicer and protective advances
 
1,460,869

 
1,433,672

Less: Allowance for uncollectible advances
 
(60,502
)
 
(52,238
)
Servicer and protective advances, net
 
$
1,400,367

 
$
1,381,434


32



The following table shows the activity in the allowance for uncollectible advances (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
52,238

 
$
24,114

Provision for uncollectible advances
 
12,683

 
4,900

Charge-offs, net of recoveries and other
 
(4,419
)
 
(2,111
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
60,502

 
$
26,903

12. Servicing of Residential Loans
The Company provides servicing for third-party investors in forward and reverse loans and for loans recognized on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company also services forward loans originated and purchased by the Company and sold with servicing rights retained. The Company’s total servicing portfolio consists of accounts serviced for others for which servicing rights have been capitalized, accounts sub-serviced for others, as well as residential loans and real estate owned recognized on the consolidated balance sheets. In connection with recent acquisitions, the Company capitalized the servicing rights associated with servicing and sub-servicing agreements in existence at the dates of acquisition.
Provided below is a summary of the Company’s total servicing portfolio (dollars in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Third-party investors (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capitalized servicing rights
 
1,602,916

 
$
179,673,881

 
1,310,357

 
$
146,143,213

Capitalized sub-servicing (2)
 
228,012

 
12,954,421

 
235,112

 
13,369,236

Sub-servicing
 
380,475

 
46,217,704

 
393,640

 
47,006,325

Total third-party servicing portfolio
 
2,211,403

 
238,846,006

 
1,939,109

 
206,518,774

On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned
 
111,674

 
11,303,677

 
112,687

 
11,442,362

Total servicing portfolio (3)
 
2,323,077

 
$
250,149,683

 
2,051,796

 
$
217,961,136

__________
(1)
Includes real estate owned serviced for third parties.
(2)
Consists of sub-servicing contracts acquired through business combinations.
(3)
Includes accounts serviced by the Servicing and Reverse Mortgage segments.
Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
The Company services loans for itself, as well as for third parties, and earns servicing income from its third-party servicing portfolio. The following table presents the components of net servicing revenue and fees, which includes revenues earned by the Servicing, Asset Receivables Management, and Reverse Mortgage segments (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Servicing fees
 
$
166,033

 
$
119,872

Incentive and performance fees
 
42,857

 
33,725

Ancillary and other fees (1)
 
22,653

 
15,811

Servicing revenue and fees
 
231,543

 
169,408

Amortization of servicing rights
 
(11,117
)
 
(11,324
)
Change in fair value of servicing rights
 
(47,634
)
 
(21,075
)
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
172,792

 
$
137,009

__________
(1)
Includes late fees of $12.3 million and $7.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

33



Servicing Rights
Servicing rights are represented by three classes, which consist of a risk-managed forward loan class, or the risk-managed loan class, a forward loan class, and a reverse loan class. These classes are based on the availability of market inputs used in determining the fair values of servicing rights and risk management strategies available to the Company. Risks inherent in servicing rights include prepayment and interest rate risks. The risk-managed loan class includes portfolios for which the Company may apply a hedging strategy in the future. At initial recognition, the fair value of the servicing right is established using assumptions consistent with those used to establish the fair value of existing servicing rights. Subsequent to initial capitalization, servicing rights are accounted for using either the fair value method or the amortization method based on the servicing class. Servicing rights carried at amortized cost consist of the forward loan class and the reverse loan class. Servicing rights carried at fair value consist of the risk-managed loan class.
Servicing Rights at Amortized Cost
The following tables summarize the activity in the carrying value of servicing rights accounted for at amortized cost by class (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
Forward Loan
 
Reverse Loan
 
Total
Balance at beginning of the period
 
$
161,782

 
$
11,994

 
$
173,776

Amortization
 
(10,367
)
 
(750
)
 
(11,117
)
Impairment
 

 

 

Balance at end of the period
 
$
151,415

 
$
11,244

 
$
162,659

 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Forward Loan
 
Reverse Loan
 
Total
Balance at beginning of the period
 
$
227,191

 
$
15,521

 
$
242,712

Reclassifications (1)
 
(26,382
)
 

 
(26,382
)
Purchases
 
36

 

 
36

Amortization
 
(10,406
)
 
(918
)
 
(11,324
)
Impairment
 

 

 

Balance at beginning of the period
 
$
190,439

 
$
14,603

 
$
205,042

_______
(1) Represents servicing rights for which the Company elected fair value accounting as of January 1, 2013. This election had no impact on retained earnings.
Servicing rights accounted for at amortized cost are evaluated for impairment by strata based on their estimated fair values. The risk characteristics used to stratify servicing rights for purposes of measuring impairment are the type of loan products, which consist of manufactured housing loans, first lien residential mortgages and second lien residential mortgages for the forward loan class, and reverse mortgages for the reverse loan class. At March 31, 2014, the fair value of servicing rights for the forward loan class and the reverse loan class was $182.2 million and $15.6 million , respectively. At December 31, 2013, the fair value of servicing rights for the forward loan class and the reverse loan class was $192.1 million and $15.9 million , respectively. Fair value was estimated using the present value of projected cash flows over the estimated period of net servicing income.

34



The estimation of fair value requires significant judgment and uses key economic inputs and assumptions, which are provided in the table below:
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
 
Forward Loan
 
Reverse Loan
Fair value of servicing rights carried at amortized cost
 
$
182,211

 
$
15,589

Inputs and assumptions:
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
5.3

 
2.8

Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
7.81
%
 
3.23
%
Weighted-average discount rate
 
11.66
%
 
18.00
%
Conditional prepayment rate
 
6.77
%
 
(1  
)  
Conditional default rate
 
3.70
%
 
(1  
)  
Conditional repayment rate
 
(2  
)  
 
26.78
%
__________
(1)
For the reverse loan class, conditional repayment rate includes assumptions for both voluntary and involuntary rates as well as assumptions for the assignment of HECMs to HUD, in accordance with obligations as servicer.
(2)
For the forward loan class, both voluntary and involuntary rates have been presented as conditional prepayment rate and conditional default rates, respectively.
The valuation of servicing rights is affected by the underlying assumptions above. Should the actual performance and timing differ materially from the Company’s projected assumptions, the estimate of fair value of the servicing rights could be materially different.
Servicing Rights at Fair Value
The following table summarizes the activity in servicing rights carried at fair value (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period (1)
 
$
1,131,124

 
$
26,382

Acquisition of EverBank net assets
 
58,680

 

Acquisition of ResCap net assets
 

 
242,604

Purchases (2)
 
319,047

 
517,742

Servicing rights capitalized upon transfers of loans
 
52,613

 
1,290

Changes in fair value due to:
 
 
 
 
Changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions (3)
 
(25,618
)
 
(3,980
)
Other changes in fair value (4)
 
(22,016
)
 
(17,095
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
1,513,830

 
$
766,943

__________
(1)
There were no servicing rights carried at fair value at December 31, 2012. The balance at the beginning of the 2013 period presented above represents those servicing rights for which the Company elected fair value accounting as of January 1, 2013.
(2) Purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily include a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs. Refer to Note 1 for additional information. Purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2013 primarily include servicing rights associated with an asset purchase from Bank of America.
(3) Represents the change in servicing rights carried at fair value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(4) Represents the change in the servicing rights carried at fair value due to the realization of expected cash flows over time.


35



The fair value of servicing rights accounted for at fair value was estimated using the present value of projected cash flows over the estimated period of net servicing income. The estimation of fair value requires significant judgment and uses key economic inputs and assumptions, which are provided in the table below:
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
6.6

 
6.8

Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
5.00
%
 
5.20
%
Weighted-average discount rate
 
9.59
%
 
9.76
%
Conditional prepayment rate
 
7.54
%
 
7.06
%
Conditional default rate
 
2.68
%
 
2.90
%
The valuation of servicing rights is affected by the underlying assumptions above. Should the actual performance and timing differ materially from the Company's projected assumptions, the estimate of fair value of the servicing rights could be materially different.
The following table summarizes the hypothetical effect on the fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value using adverse changes of 10% and 20% to the weighted-average of certain significant assumptions used in valuing these assets (dollars in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Decline in fair value due to
 
 
 
Decline in fair value due to
 
 
Actual
 
10% adverse change
 
20% adverse change
 
Actual
 
10% adverse change
 
20% adverse change
Weighted-average discount rate
 
9.59
%
 
$
(62,414
)
 
$
(120,235
)
 
9.76
%
 
$
(49,687
)
 
$
(95,531
)
Conditional prepayment rate
 
7.54
%
 
(60,865
)
 
(117,666
)
 
7.06
%
 
(47,114
)
 
(88,411
)
Conditional default rate
 
2.68
%
 
(30,258
)
 
(46,148
)
 
2.90
%
 
(12,778
)
 
(25,110
)
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the servicing rights is calculated without changing any other assumption, while in reality changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which may either magnify or counteract the effect of the change.
Fair Value of Originated Servicing Rights
For forward loans transferred with servicing retained, the Company used the following inputs and assumptions to determine the fair value of servicing rights at the dates of transfer. These servicing rights are included in servicing rights capitalized upon transfers of loans in the table presented above that summarizes the activity in servicing rights accounted for at fair value.
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Weighted-average life in years
 
 7.0 - 7.7
 
 6.1 - 7.6
Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
4.48% - 4.67%
 
4.00% - 4.20%
Weighted-average discount rates
 
 9.50%
 
 10.20% - 12.30%
Conditional prepayment rates
 
7.26% - 8.35%
 
5.40% - 8.10%
Conditional default rates
 
0.64% - 0.66%
 
0.50% - 0.60%

36



13. Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Real estate owned, net
 
$
74,380

 
$
73,573

Deferred debt issuance costs
 
58,500

 
57,517

Derivative instruments
 
41,903

 
62,365

Acquisition deposits (1)
 
2,232

 
175,048

Other
 
44,207

 
44,573

Total other assets
 
$
221,222

 
$
413,076

_______
(1)
Acquisition deposits at December 31, 2013 are related to the acquisitions of the EverBank net assets and a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs. Investor approvals for these transactions were obtained during the three months ended March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2014, acquisition deposits were related to EverBank private-label MSRs pending investor consent. Refer to Note 1 for additional information on these transactions.
14. Payables and Accrued Liabilities
Payables and accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Servicing rights and related advances purchases payable (1)
 
$
179,778

 
$
12,741

Payables to insurance carriers
 
71,885

 
69,489

Employee-related liabilities
 
63,282

 
90,788

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
62,242

 
55,174

Curtailment liability
 
56,524

 
53,905

Originations liability
 
38,915

 
50,042

Accrued interest payable
 
29,476

 
18,416

Uncertain tax positions
 
20,743

 
20,550

Acquisition related escrow funds payable to sellers
 
15,942

 
19,620

Insurance premium cancellation reserve
 
8,161

 
7,135

Mandatory repurchase obligation
 
7,937

 
8,182

Professional fees liabilities related to certain securitizations
 
6,228

 
6,607

Collateral payable on derivative instruments
 
2,695

 
19,148

Derivative instruments
 
2,500

 
5,882

Servicing transfer payables
 
2,192

 
14,167

Contingent earn-out payments
 

 
5,900

Other
 
36,061

 
36,393

Total payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
604,561

 
$
494,139

_______
(1) The increase is related primarily to the acquisition of a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs for which the Company obtained GSE investor approval
for transfer of servicing during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

37



15. Servicing Advance Liabilities
Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement
In April 2014, the Company renewed its Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae which provides for the reimbursement of certain principal and interest and protective advances that are the responsibility of the Company under certain servicing agreements. The agreement provides for a reimbursement amount of up to $950.0 million . The cost of this agreement is London Interbank Offered Rates, or LIBOR, plus 2.5% or 3.5% on the amounts that are reimbursed. The agreement now expires on March 31, 2015. Collections of advances that have been reimbursed under the agreement require remittance upon collection to settle the outstanding balance under the agreement. The balance outstanding under this agreement at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $889.8 million and $903.4 million , respectively. Future collections of servicer and protective advances in the amount of $889.8 million and $903.4 million are required to be remitted to Fannie Mae to settle the balance outstanding under the agreement at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively.
Indenture Agreement
In January 2014 , the Company entered into an Indenture Agreement that provides borrowings of up to $100.0 million and is collateralized by certain servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of the Company under certain servicing agreements. The principal and interest payments are required to be paid from the recoveries or repayment of the underlying advances. Accordingly, the timing of principal payments is dependent on the recoveries or repayments received on the underlying advances. The interest rate on the agreement is based on LIBOR plus 1.25% to 5.50% depending on the type of underlying advance as defined in the Indenture Agreement. The Indenture Agreement matures in January 2015 . The balance outstanding under this agreement was $31.5 million at March 31, 2014. Servicer and protective advances of $34.5 million were pledged as collateral at March 31, 2014 .
Revolving Credit Agreement
In December 2013, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement that provides borrowings of up to $85.0 million and is collateralized by certain servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of the Company under certain servicing agreements. When the Company collects advances that have been reimbursed under the agreement, it is required to remit at least 80% of such collections to settle the outstanding balance under the agreement. The interest rate under the agreement is LIBOR plus 2.5% through June 30, 2014, and subsequently increases to LIBOR plus 3.75% until maturity in June 2015. There was $9.0 million outstanding and $11.3 million of collateral pledged under the agreement at March 31, 2014 . There was no balance outstanding and no collateral pledged under the agreement at December 31, 2013 .
Receivables Loan Agreement
The Company is party to a Receivables Loan Agreement that provides borrowings up to $75.0 million and is collateralized by certain principal and interest, taxes and insurance, and other corporate advances reimbursable from securitization trusts serviced by the Company. The principal payments on the agreement are paid from the recoveries or repayment of underlying advances. Accordingly, the timing of the principal payments is dependent on the recoveries or repayments received on the underlying advances that collateralize the agreement. The agreement, which matures in July 2015, has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% . The balance outstanding under this agreement was $66.2 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. Servicer and protective advances of $79.3 million and $81.3 million were pledged as collateral under the agreement at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Covenants
With the exception of the Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement, the above mentioned agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants most sensitive to the Company’s operating results and financial position are the requirements that it maintain minimum tangible net worth, indebtedness to tangible net worth and minimum liquidity. During the first quarter of 2014, the Receivables Loan Agreement was amended to remove the covenant relating to the requirement to maintain a minimum annual net cash provided by operating activities and to add other customary financial covenants, including indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2014 .

38



16. Debt
Debt consists of the following (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
2013 Term Loan (unpaid principal balance of $1,496,250 at March 31, 2014
and $1,500,000 at December 31, 2013)
 
$
1,474,007

 
$
1,477,044

Senior Notes (unpaid principal balance of $575,000 at March 31, 2014
and December 31, 2013)
 
575,000

 
575,000

Convertible Notes (unpaid principal balance of $290,000 at March 31, 2014
and December 31, 2013)
 
218,248

 
215,935

Master repurchase agreements
 
651,315

 
1,085,563

Other
 
3,553

 
4,106

Total debt
 
$
2,922,123

 
$
3,357,648

Master Repurchase Agreements
The Company's subsidiaries have several master repurchase agreements which are primarily used to fund the origination of forward loans and reverse loans. The facilities had an aggregate capacity amount of $2.3 billion at March 31, 2014 and are secured by certain forward loans and reverse loans. The interest rates on the facilities are primarily based on LIBOR plus between 2.15% and 3.50% , in some cases are subject to a LIBOR floor or other minimum rates, and have various expiration dates through March 2015 . The facilities are secured by $682.9 million in unpaid principal balance of residential loans at March 31, 2014.
During the first quarter of 2014, the Company amended its master repurchase agreements relating to its forward mortgage originations business whereby, among other things, Ditech Mortgage Corp, or Ditech, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, joined the facilities and was added as a seller to the facilities.
All of the Company’s subsidiaries' master repurchase agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants most sensitive to the Company’s operating results and financial position are minimum tangible net worth requirements, indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity and profitability requirements.
At March 31, 2014, absent a waiver received from its counterparty, RMS would not have been in compliance with its minimum profitability covenant contained in one of its master repurchase agreements due to RMS’ net loss during the three months ended March 31, 2014. In April 2014, RMS obtained a waiver of compliance effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The waiver of compliance waived all rights and remedies that otherwise would have been available under the master repurchase agreement in the event of non-compliance by RMS. In April 2014, RMS amended another one of its master repurchase agreements to, among other things, change the profitability covenant definition, from an event of default to an advance rate trigger, and make certain pricing, interest rate, and fee changes. These changes, other than the interest rate and fee changes, were effective for the test period ended on March 31, 2014. Absent this amendment, RMS would not have been in compliance with its minimum profitability covenant for this period. As a result of the waiver and amendment obtained by RMS for the two master repurchase agreements referenced above, all of the Company's subsidiaries were in compliance with its covenants.
17. Mortgage-Backed Debt and Related Collateral
Mortgage-backed debt consists of debt issued by the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts that has been consolidated by the Company. The mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts is carried at amortized cost while the mortgage-backed debt of the Non-Residual Trusts is carried at fair value. Refer to the Consolidated Variable Interest Entities section of Note 4 for further information regarding the consolidated Residual and Non-Residual Trusts.
Borrower remittances received on the residential loans collateralizing this debt, as well as draws under LOCs serving as credit enhancements to certain Non-Residual Trusts, are used to make the principal and interest payments due on the mortgage-backed debt. The maturity of the mortgage-backed debt is directly affected by principal prepayments on the collateral. As a result, the actual maturity of the mortgage-backed debt is likely to occur earlier than the stated maturity. Certain of the Company’s mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts is also subject to redemption according to the specific terms of the respective indenture agreements, including the option to exercise a clean-up call. The mortgage-backed debt issued by the Non-Residual Trusts is subject to mandatory clean-up calls. The Company is obligated to exercise the clean-up calls on the earliest possible call date, which is the date the principal amount of each loan pool falls to 10% of the original principal amount. The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the various respective call dates is $417.4 million .

39



Residual Trusts
The Residual Trusts have issued mortgage-backed and asset-backed notes, or the Trust Notes, consisting of both public debt offerings and private offerings with final maturities ranging from 2029 to 2050 .
The Residual Trusts, with the exception of WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1, contain provisions that require the cash payments received from the underlying residential loans be applied to reduce the principal balance of the Trust Notes unless certain overcollateralization or other similar targets are satisfied. These trusts contain delinquency and cumulative loss triggers, that, if exceeded, allocate any excess cash flows to paying down the outstanding principal balance of the Trust Notes for that particular trust at an accelerated pace. Assuming no servicer trigger events have occurred and the overcollateralization targets have been met, any excess cash is released to the Company either monthly or quarterly, in accordance with the terms of the respective underlying trust agreements. For WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1, principal and interest payments are not paid on the subordinate note or residual interests, which are held by the Company, until all amounts due on the senior notes are fully paid.
Since January 2008, Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust, or Trust 2006-1, has exceeded certain triggers and has not provided any excess cash flow to the Company. The delinquency rate for Trust 2006-1, the calculation of which includes real estate owned, was 8.3% at March 31, 2014 compared to a delinquency trigger level of 8.0% and its cumulative loss rate was 8.2% at March 31, 2014 compared to a cumulative loss trigger level of 7.0% . Since February 2014, Mid-State Trust VII, or Trust VII, has exceeded the 12 month loss trigger level and has not provided any excess cash flow to the Company. The 12 month loss rate for Trust VII was 1.7% at March 31, 2014 compared to a 12 month loss trigger level of 1.5%. In addition, from September 2012 through February 2013, Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust, or Trust 2005-1, exceeded the delinquency trigger level of 8.0% . At March 31, 2013, the delinquency rate for Trust 2005-1 was cured and remained cured as of March 31, 2014 . Trust 2005-1 did not exceed the cumulative loss trigger during September 2012 through February 2013.
Non-Residual Trusts
The Company has consolidated 10 trusts for which it is the servicer, but does not hold any residual interests. The Company is obligated to exercise mandatory clean-up call obligations for these trusts and expects to call these securitizations beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019 . The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the various respective call dates is $417.4 million .
Collateral for Mortgage-Backed Debt
At March 31, 2014 , the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts had an aggregate of $1.9 billion of principal in outstanding debt, which is collateralized by $2.3 billion of assets, including residential loans, receivables related to the Non-Residual Trusts, real estate owned, net, and restricted cash and cash equivalents. For 7 of the 10 Non-Residual Trusts, LOCs were issued by a third party as credit enhancements to these securitizations and, accordingly, the securitization trusts will draw on these LOCs if there are insufficient cash flows from the underlying collateral to pay the debt holders. The notional amount of expected draws under the LOCs at March 31, 2014 was $39.7 million . The fair value of the expected draws of $39.3 million at March 31, 2014 has been recognized as receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts, which is a component of receivables, net on the consolidated balance sheets. All of the Company’s mortgage-backed debt is non-recourse and not cross-collateralized and, therefore, must be satisfied exclusively from the proceeds of the residential loans and real estate owned held in each securitization trust and from the draws on the LOCs for certain Non-Residual Trusts.
The following table summarizes the collateral for mortgage-backed debt (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Residential loans of securitization trusts, principal balance
 
$
2,207,261

 
$
2,248,467

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
39,328

 
43,545

Real estate owned, net
 
36,569

 
42,298

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
59,650

 
58,081

Total mortgage-backed debt collateral
 
$
2,342,808

 
$
2,392,391


40



18. Share-Based Compensation
During the first quarter of 2014, the Company granted a target performance award of 468,257 restricted stock units, or RSUs, that contained a market-based performance condition in addition to a service component. These RSUs vest at the end of the performance period, or December 31, 2016, and the grants ultimately awarded will be based upon the performance percentage, which can range from 0% to 200% of the target performance award grant. The RSUs ultimately awarded upon vesting are based on the percentile rank of the Company's total shareholder return, or TSR, relative to the distribution of TSRs of peer group companies. TSR is measured based on a comparison of the average closing price for the twenty trading days immediately prior to March 24, 2014, or the first day of the performance period, and the average closing price for the last twenty trading days of the performance period. TSR will include the effect of dividends paid during the performance period. The fair value of these RSUs at their grant date was $34.66 and was estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model that included valuation inputs for expected volatility of 47% , risk free interest rate of 0.83% and no dividend yield. Also during the period, the Company granted 201,013 RSUs that vest over three years based upon a service condition. The weighted average grant date fair value of $28.12 for these awards was based on the average of the high and the low selling price of the Company's stock on the date of grant.
19. Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $11.6 million and $18.8 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 40.0% and 40.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Income Tax Exposure
The Company was part of the Walter Energy, Inc., or Walter Energy, consolidated group prior to the spin-off from Walter Energy, the principal agent, on April 17, 2009 . As such, the Company is jointly and severally liable with Walter Energy for any final taxes, interest, and/or penalties owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group during the time that the Company was a part of the Walter Energy consolidated group. However, in connection with the spin-off of the Company’s business from Walter Energy, the Company and Walter Energy entered into a Tax Separation Agreement dated April 17, 2009, pursuant to which Walter Energy is responsible for the payment of all federal income taxes (including any interest or penalties applicable thereto) of the consolidated group. Nonetheless, to the extent that Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, the Company could be responsible for any unpaid amounts including, according to Walter Energy’s most recent public filing on Form 10-K, those relating to the following:
The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, has filed a proof of claim for a substantial amount of taxes, interest, and penalties with respect to fiscal years ended August 31, 1983 through May 31, 1994. The public filing goes on to disclose that issues have been litigated in bankruptcy court and that an opinion was issued by the court in June 2010 as to the remaining disputed issues. The filing further states that the amounts initially asserted by the IRS do not reflect the subsequent resolution of various issues through settlements or concessions by the parties. Walter Energy believes that any financial exposure with respect to those issues that have not been resolved or settled by the Proof of Claim is limited to interest and possible penalties and the amount of tax assessed has been offset by tax reductions in future years. All of the issues in the Proof of Claim, which have not been settled or conceded, have been litigated before the Bankruptcy Court and are subject to appeal, but only at the conclusion of the entire adversary proceedings.
The IRS completed its audit of Walter Energy’s federal income tax returns for the years ended May 31, 2000 through December 31, 2005. The IRS issued 30 -Day Letters to Walter Energy proposing changes to tax for these tax years which Walter Energy has protested. Walter Energy’s filing states that the disputed issues in this audit period are similar to the issues remaining in the above-referenced dispute and therefore Walter Energy believes that its financial exposure for these years is limited to interest and possible penalties.
While the IRS had completed its audit of Walter Energy’s federal income tax returns for the years 2006 to 2008 and issued 30-Day Letters to Walter Energy proposing changes to tax for these tax years which Walter Energy has protested, the IRS reopened the audit of these periods in 2012. Walter Energy’s filing states that the disputed issues in this audit period are similar to the issue remaining in the above-referenced dispute and therefore Walter Energy believes that its financial exposure for these years is limited to interest and possible penalties.
Walter Energy reports that the IRS is conducting an audit of Walter Energy’s tax returns filed for 2009 through 2012. Since examination is ongoing, Walter Energy cannot estimate the amount of any resulting tax deficiency or overpayment, if any.
Walter Energy believes that all of its current and prior tax filing positions have substantial merit and intends to defend vigorously any tax claims asserted and it believes that it has sufficient accruals to address any claims, including interest and penalties, and as a result, believes that any potential difference between actual losses and costs incurred and the amounts accrued would be immaterial.

41



The Tax Separation Agreement also provides that Walter Energy is responsible for the preparation and filing of any tax returns for the consolidated group for the periods when the Company was part of the Walter Energy consolidated group. This arrangement may result in conflicts between Walter Energy and the Company. In addition, the spin-off of the Company from Walter Energy was intended to qualify as a tax-free spin-off under Section 355 of the Code. The Tax Separation Agreement provides generally that if the spin-off is determined not to be tax-free pursuant to Section 355 of the Code, any taxes imposed on Walter Energy or a Walter Energy shareholder as a result of such determination, or Distribution Taxes, which are the result of the acts or omissions of Walter Energy or its affiliates, will be the responsibility of Walter Energy. However, should Distribution Taxes result from the acts or omissions of the Company or its affiliates, such Distribution Taxes will be the responsibility of the Company. The Tax Separation Agreement goes on to provide that Walter Energy and the Company shall be jointly liable, pursuant to a designated allocation formula, for any Distribution Taxes that are not specifically allocated to Walter Energy or the Company. To the extent that Walter Energy is unable or unwilling to pay any Distribution Taxes for which it is responsible under the Tax Separation Agreement, the Company could be liable for those taxes as a result of being a member of the Walter Energy consolidated group for the year in which the spin-off occurred. The Tax Separation Agreement also provides for payments from Walter Energy in the event that an additional taxable dividend is required to cure a REIT disqualification from the determination of a shortfall in the distribution of non-REIT earnings and profits made immediately following the spin-off. As with Distribution Taxes, the Company will be responsible for this dividend if Walter Energy is unable or unwilling to pay.
Other Tax Exposure
On June 28, 2010, the Alabama Department of Revenue, or ADOR, preliminarily assessed financial institution excise tax of approximately $4.2 million , which includes interest and penalties, on a predecessor entity for the years 2004 through 2008. This tax is imposed on financial institutions doing business in the State of Alabama. The Company was informed that the ADOR had requested legal advice with regard to the application of certain provisions of the Alabama Constitution in response to issues the Company had previously raised in its protests to the initial assessments. In November 2012, the Company received communication from the State of Alabama that they anticipate issuing a final assessment if payment is not made. The Company has contested the assessment and believes that it did not meet the definition of a financial institution doing business in the State of Alabama as defined by the Alabama Tax Code.
20. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Basic earnings per share
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
17,377

 
$
27,749

Less: Net income allocated to unvested participating securities
 
(133
)
 
(463
)
Net income available to common stockholders (numerator)
 
17,244

 
27,286

 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (denominator)
 
37,429

 
36,877

 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share
 
$
0.46

 
$
0.74

 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
17,377

 
$
27,749

Less: Net income allocated to unvested participating securities
 
(131
)
 
(454
)
Net income available to common stockholders (numerator)
 
17,246

 
27,295

 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
 
37,429

 
36,877

Add: Effect of dilutive stock options, non-participating securities, and convertible notes
 
576

 
757

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding (denominator)
 
38,005

 
37,634

 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share
 
$
0.45

 
$
0.73


42



A portion of the Company’s unvested RSUs are considered participating securities. During periods of net income, the calculation of earnings per share for common stock is adjusted to exclude the income attributable to the participating securities from the numerator and exclude the dilutive impact of those shares from the denominator. During periods of net loss, no effect is given to the participating securities because they do not share in the losses of the Company.
The calculation of diluted earnings per share does not include 5.9 million and 4.9 million shares for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because their effect would have been antidilutive. The Convertible Notes are antidilutive when calculating earnings per share when the Company's average stock price is less than $58.80 . Upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, the Company may pay or deliver, at its option, cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock. It is the Company’s intent to settle all conversions through combination settlement, which involves repayment of an amount of cash equal to the principal amount and any excess of conversion value over the principal amount in shares of common stock.
21. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
The Company’s supplemental disclosures of cash flow information are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
 
$
66,188

 
$
55,656

Cash paid (received) for taxes
 
(24,513
)
 
1,165

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
 
 
 
 
Servicing rights capitalized upon transfers of loans
 
52,613

 
1,290

Real estate owned acquired through foreclosure
 
28,960

 
25,483

Residential loans originated to finance the sale of real estate owned
 
15,833

 
19,531

Acquisition of servicing rights
 
174,991

 
226,505

22. Segment Reporting
Management has organized the Company into six reportable segments based primarily on its services as follows:
Servicing — consists of operations that perform servicing for third-party investors in forward loans, as well as for the Loans and Residuals segment and for the Non-Residual Trusts reflected in the Other segment. Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, the Servicing segment services forward loans that were originated or purchased by the Originations segment and sold to third-parties with servicing rights retained.
Originations — consists of operations that originate and purchase forward loans that are sold to third parties with servicing rights generally retained.
Reverse Mortgage — consists of operations that purchase and originate reverse loans that are securitized but remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for secured borrowings. This segment also performs servicing for third-party investors in reverse loans and provides other ancillary services for the reverse mortgage market.
Asset Receivables Management — performs collections of post charge-off deficiency balances on behalf of third-party securitization trusts and other asset owners.
Insurance — provides voluntary and lender-placed hazard insurance for residential loan borrowers, as well as other ancillary products, to third parties and the Loans and Residuals segment through the Company’s insurance agency for a commission.
Loans and Residuals — consists of the assets and mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts and the unencumbered residential loan portfolio and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward loans.
In order to reconcile the financial results for the Company’s reportable segments to the consolidated results, the Company has presented the revenue and expenses of the Non-Residual Trusts and other non-reportable operating segments, as well as certain corporate expenses that have not been allocated to the business segments, in Other. Intersegment servicing and insurance revenues and expenses have been eliminated. Intersegment revenues are recognized on the same basis of accounting as such revenue is recognized on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

43



Presented in the tables below are the Company’s financial results by reportable segment reconciled to consolidated income before income taxes (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Consolidated
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees (1)
 
$
160,826

 
$

 
$
7,610

 
$
9,046

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(4,690
)
 
$
172,792

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
104,034

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
104,034

Interest income on loans
 

 

 

 

 

 
34,422

 

 

 
34,422

Insurance revenue
 

 

 

 

 
23,388

 

 

 

 
23,388

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 

 

 
17,236

 

 

 

 

 

 
17,236

Other revenues
 
8,554

 
5,180

 
3,022

 

 
4

 
2

 
1,314

 

 
18,076

Total revenues
 
169,380

 
109,214

 
27,868

 
9,046

 
23,392

 
34,424

 
1,314

 
(4,690
)
 
369,948

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Interest expense
 
10,413

 
6,833

 
859

 

 

 
20,303

 
36,441

 

 
74,849

Depreciation and amortization
 
8,705

 
4,995

 
2,449

 
1,302

 
1,183

 

 
10

 

 
18,644

Other expenses, net
 
116,317

 
77,176

 
34,360

 
5,245

 
7,542

 
3,624

 
5,413

 
(4,690
)
 
244,987

Total expenses
 
135,435

 
89,004

 
37,668

 
6,547

 
8,725

 
23,927

 
41,864

 
(4,690
)
 
338,480

OTHER LOSSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Other net fair value losses
 
(174
)
 

 

 

 

 
(242
)
 
(2,087
)
 

 
(2,503
)
Total other losses
 
(174
)
 

 

 

 

 
(242
)
 
(2,087
)
 

 
(2,503
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
33,771

 
$
20,210

 
$
(9,800
)
 
$
2,499

 
$
14,667

 
$
10,255

 
$
(42,637
)
 
$

 
$
28,965

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
__________
(1)
The Company’s Servicing and Asset Receivables Management segments include net servicing revenue and fees of $4.6 million and $0.1 million , respectively, associated with intercompany activity with the Originations, Loans and Residuals and Other segments.

44



 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Consolidated
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees (1)
 
$
125,127

 
$

 
$
6,748

 
$
10,090

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(4,956
)
 
$
137,009

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
74,062

 
4,383

 

 

 

 

 

 
78,445

Interest income on loans
 

 

 

 

 

 
36,898

 

 

 
36,898

Insurance revenue
 

 

 

 

 
17,534

 

 

 

 
17,534

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 

 

 
36,788

 

 

 

 

 

 
36,788

Other revenues
 
462

 
1,997

 
2,945

 
64

 
7

 
3

 
2,416

 
(39
)
 
7,855

Total revenues
 
125,589

 
$
76,059

 
50,864

 
10,154

 
17,541

 
36,901

 
2,416

 
(4,995
)
 
314,529

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Interest expense
 
2,410

 
706

 
3,529

 

 

 
22,296

 
25,201

 

 
54,142

Depreciation and amortization
 
8,857

 
1,677

 
2,723

 
1,756

 
1,314

 

 
6

 

 
16,333

Other expenses, net
 
92,048

 
39,417

 
32,523

 
6,030

 
8,508

 
5,830

 
16,908

 
(4,995
)
 
196,269

Total expenses
 
103,315

 
41,800

 
38,775

 
7,786

 
9,822

 
28,126

 
42,115

 
(4,995
)
 
266,744

OTHER LOSSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Other net fair value losses
 
(245
)
 

 

 

 

 
(162
)
 
(854
)
 

 
(1,261
)
Total other losses
 
(245
)
 

 

 

 

 
(162
)
 
(854
)
 

 
(1,261
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
22,029

 
$
34,259

 
$
12,089

 
$
2,368

 
$
7,719

 
$
8,613

 
$
(40,553
)
 
$

 
$
46,524

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
__________
(1)
The Company’s Servicing and Asset Receivables Management segments include net servicing revenue and fees of $4.9 million and 0.1 million , respectively, associated with intercompany activity with the Loans and Residuals and Other segments.

23.    Capital Requirements
The Company and its subsidiaries are required to maintain regulatory compliance with GSE and other agency and state programs as well as investor requirements, some of which are financial covenants related to minimum levels of net worth and other financial requirements. To the extent that these mandatory capital requirements are not met, the Company’s selling and servicing agreements could be terminated.
Due to the accounting treatment for reverse loans as secured borrowings when transferred, RMS has obtained an indefinite waiver for certain of these requirements from Ginnie Mae and through June 2014 from Fannie Mae. In addition, the Company has provided a guarantee beginning on the date of acquisition of RMS whereby the Company guarantees its performance and obligations under the Ginnie Mae HMBS Program. In the event that the Company fails to honor this guarantee, Ginnie Mae could terminate RMS’ status as a qualified issuer of HMBS as well as take other actions permitted by law that could impact the operations of RMS, including the termination or suspension of RMS’ servicing rights associated with reverse loans guaranteed by Ginnie Mae HMBS. Ginnie Mae has continued to affirm RMS’ current commitment authority to issue HMBS. In addition the Company has provided a guarantee dated May 31, 2013 whereby it guarantees RMS’ performance obligations with Fannie Mae under a mortgage selling and servicing contract between RMS and Fannie Mae. RMS does not currently sell Fannie Mae loans. However, in the event that the Company fails to honor this guarantee, Fannie Mae could disallow the servicing of its loans by RMS.
Except as described above, the Company was in compliance with all of its capital requirements at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 .


45



24. Commitments and Contingencies
Mandatory Repurchase Obligation
The Company has a mandatory obligation to repurchase loans at par from Freddie Mac when loans become 90 days past due. The total loans outstanding and subject to being repurchased were $74.7 million at March 31, 2014. The Company has estimated the fair value of this contingent liability at March 31, 2014 as $7.9 million , which is included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company estimates that the undiscounted losses to be incurred from the mandatory repurchase obligation over the remaining lives of the loans were $9.8 million at March 31, 2014.
Professional Fees Liability Related to Certain Securitizations
The Company has a contingent liability related to payments for certain professional fees that it will be required to make over the remaining life of various securitization trusts, which are based in part on the outstanding principal balance of the debt issued by these trusts. At March 31, 2014, the Company estimated the fair value of this contingent liability at $6.2 million , which is included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company estimates that the gross amount of payments it expects to pay over the remaining lives of the securitizations was $7.9 million at March 31, 2014.
Letter of Credit Reimbursement Obligation
The Company has an obligation to reimburse a third party for the final $165.0 million in LOCs if drawn for an aggregate of 11 securitization trusts on the LOCs issued to these trusts by a third party. Seven of these securitization trusts were consolidated on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets due to the Company’s mandatory clean-up call obligation related to these trusts. The LOCs were issued by a third party as credit enhancements to these 11 securitizations and, accordingly, the securitization trusts will draw on these LOCs if there are insufficient cash flows from the underlying collateral to pay the debt holders. The total amount available on these LOCs for all 11 securitization trusts was $271.2 million at March 31, 2014. Based on the Company’s estimates of the underlying performance of the collateral in these securitizations, the Company does not expect that the final $165.0 million will be drawn, and therefore, no liability for the fair value of this obligation has been recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, although actual performance may differ from this estimate in the future. Refer to the Consolidated Variable Interest Entities section of Note 4 for additional information.
Mandatory Clean-Up Call Obligation
The Company is obligated to exercise the mandatory clean-up call obligations assumed as part of an agreement to acquire the rights to service the loans in the Non-Residual Trusts. The Company expects to call these securitizations beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019. The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the respective call dates is $417.4 million . Refer to Note 4 and for additional information.
Unfunded Commitments
Reverse Mortgage Segment
The Company had floating-rate reverse loans in which the borrowers have additional borrowing capacity of $810.4 million and similar commitments on fixed rate reverse loans of $25.3 million at March 31, 2014. This additional borrowing capacity is primarily in the form of undrawn lines of credit, with the balance available on a scheduled or unscheduled payment basis. The Company also had short-term commitments to lend $75.6 million and commitments to purchase and sell loans totaling $8.3 million and $80.5 million , respectively, at March 31, 2014.
Originations Segment
The Company had short-term commitments to lend $2.0 billion and commitments to purchase loans totaling $4.7 million at March 31, 2014. In addition, the Company has commitments to sell $2.2 billion and purchase $130.5 million in mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2014.
Representations and Warranties
The Company sells and securitizes conventional conforming forward loans predominantly to GSEs, such as Fannie Mae. The Company may also sell residential loans, primarily those that do not meet criteria for whole loan sales to GSEs, through whole loan sales to private non-GSE purchasers. In doing so, representations and warranties regarding certain attributes of the loans are made to the GSE or the third-party purchaser. Subsequent to the sale or securitization, if it is determined that the loans sold are in breach of these representations or warranties, the Company generally has an obligation to either: (1) repurchase the loan for the unpaid principal balance, accrued interest, and related advances, (2) indemnify the purchaser, or (3) make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of the loan. The Company’s credit loss may be reduced by any recourse it has to correspondent lenders that, in turn, have sold such residential loans to the Company and breached similar or other representations and warranties.

46



The Company’s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits of exposure. The current unpaid principal balance of loans sold by the Company to date represents the maximum exposure to repurchases related to representations and warranties.
The Company’s obligations vary based upon the nature of the repurchase demand and the current status of the residential loan. The Company’s estimate of the liability associated with risk and warranties exposure was $11.2 million at March 31, 2014 and is included in originations liability as part of payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
Mortgage Servicing
The Company services loans originated and securitized by the Company or one of its subsidiaries and also services loans on behalf of securitization trusts or other investors. The Company’s servicing obligations are set forth in industry regulations established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, and the FHA and in servicing and sub-servicing agreements with the applicable counterparties, such as Fannie Mae and other investors. Both the regulations and the servicing agreements provide that the servicer may be liable for failure to perform its servicing obligations and further provide remedies for certain servicer breaches. Subsequent to the completion of the acquisition of RMS, the Company discovered a failure by RMS to record certain liabilities to HUD, FHA, and/or investors related to servicing errors by RMS. FHA regulations provide that servicers meet a series of event-specific timeframes during the default, foreclosure, conveyance, and mortgage insurance claim cycles. Failure to timely meet any processing deadline may stop the accrual of debenture interest otherwise payable in satisfaction of a claim under the FHA mortgage insurance contract and the servicer may be responsible to HUD for debenture interest that is not self-curtailed by the servicer, or for making the investor whole for any interest curtailed by FHA due to not meeting the required event-specific timeframes. The Company had a curtailment obligation liability of $56.5 million at March 31, 2014 related to the foregoing which reflects management’s best estimate of the probable lifetime claim. The curtailment liability is recorded in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company assumed $46.0 million of this liability through the acquisition of RMS, which resulted in a corresponding offset to goodwill and deferred tax assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded a provision related to the curtailment liability of $0.1 million and collected $2.5 million from a prior servicer. The Company has potential financial statement exposure for an additional $123.2 million related to similar claims, which are reasonably possible, but which the Company believes are the responsibility of third parties (e.g., prior servicers and/or investors). The Company’s potential exposure to this additional risk relates to the possibility that such third parties may claim that the Company is responsible for the servicing liability or that the Company exacerbated an existing failure by the third party. The actual amount, if any, of this exposure is difficult to estimate and requires significant management judgment as curtailment obligations are an emerging industry issue. Moreover, the Company is and will continue to pursue mitigation efforts to reduce both the direct exposure and the reasonably possible third-party-related exposure.
Litigation
As discussed in Note 19, Walter Energy is in disputes with the IRS on a number of federal income tax issues. Walter Energy has stated in its public filings that it believes that all of its current and prior tax filing positions have substantial merit and that Walter Energy intends to defend vigorously any tax claims asserted. Under the terms of the tax separation agreement between the Company and Walter Energy dated April 17, 2009, Walter Energy is responsible for the payment of all federal income taxes (including any interest or penalties applicable thereto) of the consolidated group, which includes the aforementioned claims of the IRS. However, to the extent that Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, the Company could be responsible for any unpaid amounts.
On October 2, 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the HUD Office of Inspector General requesting documents and other information concerning (i) the curtailment of interest payments on HECMs serviced or sub-serviced by RMS and (ii) RMS’ contractual arrangements with a third-party vendor for the management and disposition of real estate owned properties. The Company is responding to the subpoena and at this stage does not have sufficient information to make an assessment of the outcome or impact of HUD’s investigation.
In response to a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, from the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, issued in November 2010 and a CID from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, in September 2012, Green Tree Servicing LLC, or Green Tree Servicing, a wholly-owned subsidiary, has produced documents and other information concerning a wide range of its loan servicing operations. On October 7, 2013, the CFPB notified Green Tree Servicing that the CFPB’s staff was considering recommending that the CFPB take action against Green Tree Servicing for alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. On February 20, 2014, the FTC and CFPB staff advised Green Tree Servicing that they had sought authority to bring an enforcement action and negotiate a resolution related to alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. The Company's understanding is that the CFPB staff now has authority to commence an action against Green Tree Servicing and that the FTC staff has authority to negotiate but would need further FTC approval to file such an action. In April 2014, Green Tree Servicing began discussions with the FTC and CFPB staffs to determine if a settlement of the proposed action could be achieved, and those discussions are ongoing. The Company is unable to predict whether the proposed action will be settled or what the terms of any such settlement may be. Any such

47



settlement may involve an injunction against violating various consumer protection statutes and may result in other changes to our business practices. A settlement may also entail penalties, consumer restitution, and increased government reporting obligations. The Company cannot provide any assurance that the FTC and/or CFPB will not take legal action against the Company or that the allegations made by the FTC and/or CFPB or t he outcome of any such action or settlement will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
On March 7, 2014, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Mark O’Brien, Charles Cauthen, Denmar Dixon, Marc Helm and Robert Yeary captioned Beck v. Walter Investment Management Corp., et al., No. 1:14-cv-20880 (S.D. Fla.). The complaint asserts federal securities law claims against the Company and the individual defendants under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Additional claims are asserted against the individual defendants under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaint alleges that between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014 the Company and the individual defendants made material misstatements or omissions relating to the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting, the liabilities associated with the Company’s acquisition of RMS, RMS's internal controls, and certain of the Company's business practices that are being reviewed by the FTC and the CFPB. The complaint seeks class certification and an unspecified amount of damages on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s securities between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014. We cannot provide any assurance as to the disposition of the complaint or that such disposition will not have a material adverse effect to the Company.
The Company is, and expects that it will continue to be, involved in litigation, arbitration, investigations, and claims in the ordinary course of business, including purported class actions and other legal proceedings challenging whether certain of its residential loan servicing practices and other aspects of its business comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements. These legal proceedings include, among other things, putative class action claims concerning alleged "force-placed insurance," the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal and state laws and statutes. The outcome of these legal proceedings is uncertain, and it is possible that adverse results in such proceedings (which could include penalties, punitive damages and injunctive relief affecting the Company's business practices) could have a material adverse effect on the Company's prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
Transactions with Walter Energy
Following the spin-off in 2009 from Walter Energy, the Company and Walter Energy have operated independently, and neither has any ownership interest in the other. In order to allocate responsibility for overlapping or related aspects of their businesses, the Company and Walter Energy entered into certain agreements pursuant to which the Company and Walter Energy assume responsibility for various aspects of their businesses and agree to indemnify one another against certain liabilities that may arise from their respective businesses, including liabilities related to certain tax and litigation exposure.
25. Subsequent Events
On April 23, 2014, the Company and certain investment funds managed by York Capital Management, collectively York, entered into a securities purchase and investor rights agreement, or the Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which both parties agreed to invest in Walter Capital Opportunity Corp., or WCO. WCO was formed to invest in excess servicing spread related to mortgage servicing rights, forward mortgage servicing rights, forward and reverse residential whole loans, reverse mortgage servicing rights, agency and non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and other real estate related securities and related derivatives, and to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code.


48



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The terms "Walter Investment," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" as used throughout this report refer to Walter Investment Management Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2014, and with the information under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in that Annual Report on Form 10-K. Historical results and trends discussed herein and therein may not be indicative of future operations, particularly in light of our recent acquisitions. Our results of operations and financial condition, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, reflect management’s evaluation and interpretation of business conditions, changing capital market conditions, and other factors.
Our website can be found at www.walterinvestment.com . We make available free of charge on our website or provide a link on our website to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. To access these filings, go to our website, click on “Investor Relations” and then click on "SEC Filings". We also make available through our website other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC under the Exchange Act, including our proxy statements and reports filed by officers and directors under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as our Code of Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Resources Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, our website includes disclosure relating to certain non-GAAP financial measures (as defined by SEC Regulation G) that we may make public orally, telephonically, by webcast, by broadcast, or by similar means from time to time.
From time to time, we may use our website as a channel of distribution of material company information. Financial and other material information regarding the Company is routinely posted on and accessible at http://investor.walterinvestment.com .
The information on our website or obtained through our website is not part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Our Investor Relations Department can be contacted at 3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 1100, Tampa, Florida 33607, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone (813) 421-7694.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Certain statements in this report, including matters discussed under this Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which reflect our current views with respect to certain events that may affect our future performance. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Certain of these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “may,” “should,” “will,” or other similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, which could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from future results, performance or achievements expressed in these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs, intentions and expectations. These statements are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those factors, risks and uncertainties described below and in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 under the caption “Risk Factors,” and in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC.
In particular (but not by way of limitation), the following important factors and assumptions could affect our future results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
local, regional, national and global economic trends and developments in general, and local, regional and national real estate and residential mortgage market trends in particular;
continued uncertainty in the United States, or U.S., home sales market, including both the volume and pricing of sales, due to adverse economic conditions or otherwise;
fluctuations in interest rates and levels of mortgage originations and prepayments;
delay or failure to realize the anticipated benefits we expect to realize from past or future acquisitions including any indemnification rights;

49



our ability to successfully develop our loan originations platforms;
the occurrence of anticipated growth of the specialty servicing sector and the reverse mortgage sector;
the effects of competition on our existing and potential future business, including the impact of competitors with greater financial resources and broader scopes of operation;
our ability to raise capital to make suitable investments to offset run-off in a number of the portfolios we service and to otherwise grow our business;
the availability of suitable investments for any capital that we are able to raise and risks associated with any such investments we may pursue;
our ability to implement strategic initiatives, particularly as they relate to our ability to develop new business, including the development of our originations business, the implementation of delinquency flow loan servicing programs and the receipt of new business, all of which are subject to customer demand and various third-party approvals;
risks related to our acquisitions, including our ability to successfully integrate large volumes of assets and servicing rights, as well as businesses and platforms that we have acquired or may acquire in the future into our business, and our ability to obtain approvals required to acquire and retain servicing rights and other assets in the future;
risks related to the financing incurred in connection with past or future acquisitions and operations, including our ability to achieve cash flows sufficient to carry our debt and otherwise comply with the covenants of our debt;
our ability to earn anticipated levels of performance and incentive fees on serviced business;
changes in federal, state and local policies, laws and regulations affecting our business, including mortgage and reverse mortgage originations and/or servicing, and changes to our licensing requirements;
changes caused by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, including regulations required by the Dodd-Frank Act that have not yet been promulgated or have yet to be finalized;
changes in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB's, mortgage loan servicing and origination rules;
increased scrutiny and potential enforcement actions by federal and state agencies, including pending investigations by the CFPB and the Federal Trade Commission and the investigation by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD.
uncertainty related to inquiries from government agencies into foreclosure, loss mitigation, loan servicing transfers and lender-placed insurance practices;
uncertainties related to regulatory pressures on large banks related to their mortgage servicing, as well as regulatory pressure on the rest of the mortgage servicing sector;
uncertainties related to our ability to meet increasing performance and compliance standards, such as those of the National Mortgage Settlement, and reporting obligations and increases to the cost of doing business as a result thereof;
changes in regards to the rights and obligations of property owners, mortgagors and tenants;
our ability to remain qualified as a government-sponsored entity, or GSE, approved seller, servicer or component servicer, including the ability to continue to comply with the GSEs’ respective loan and selling and servicing guides;
changes to the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, the Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, or HECM, Program or other similar government programs;
loss of our loan servicing, loan origination, insurance agency, and collection agency licenses;
uncertainty relating to the status and future role of GSEs;
uncertainties related to the processes for judicial and non-judicial foreclosure proceedings, including potential additional costs, delays or moratoria in the future or claims pertaining to past practices;
unexpected losses resulting from pending, threatened or unforeseen litigation or other third-party claims against the Company;
changes in public or client or investor opinion on mortgage origination, loan servicing and debt collection practices;
the effects of any changes to the servicing compensation structure for mortgage servicers pursuant to programs of government-sponsored entities or various regulatory authorities; changes to our insurance agency business, including increased scrutiny by federal and state regulators and GSEs on lender-placed insurance practices and restrictions on our insurance agency’s receipt of commissions on lender-placed insurance;
the effect of our risk management strategies, including the management and protection of the personal and private information of our customers and mortgage holders and the protection of our information systems from third-party interference (cyber security);

50



changes in accounting rules and standards, which are highly complex and continuing to evolve in the forward and reverse servicing and originations sectors;
uncertainties relating to interest curtailment obligations and any related financial and litigation exposure;
the satisfactory maintenance of effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
our continued listing on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE; and
the ability or willingness of Walter Energy, Inc., or Walter Energy, our prior parent, and other counterparties to satisfy material obligations under agreements with us.
All of the above factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and may be beyond our control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all such factors or to assess the effect of each such new factor on our business.
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore any of these statements included herein may prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved. We make no commitment to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances after the date any such statement is made, except as otherwise required under the federal securities laws. If we were in any particular instance to update or correct a forward-looking statement, investors and others should not conclude that we would make additional updates or corrections thereafter except as otherwise required under the federal securities laws.
Executive Summary
The Company
We are a fee-based services provider to the residential mortgage industry focused primarily on providing servicing for credit-sensitive forward mortgage loans and for reverse mortgage loans. At March 31, 2014 , we serviced approximately 2.3 million mortgage loans with approximately $250.1 billion in unpaid principal balance. Our servicing portfolio significantly expanded throughout 2013 as a result of our servicing asset acquisitions, the most significant of which were our $126.7 billion of bulk portfolio acquisitions from Residential Capital LLC, or ResCap, and Bank of America, or BOA, in early 2013, and our other bulk and flow servicing asset acquisitions, which contributed an additional $17.4 billion to our servicing portfolio. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 , we continued to grow our forward loan portfolio with $ 37.3 billion of bulk portfolio acquisitions from EverBank Financial Corp, or EverBank, and an affiliate of a national bank. Refer to the Recent Acquisitions section below. Our business provides servicing to the forward residential loan market for several product types including agency or non-agency and first and second lien and manufactured housing loans. We focus on credit-sensitive residential mortgages, which we define as loans that are delinquent or more operationally intensive to support. We also service higher credit-quality performing forward mortgage loans.
Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “residential loans” refer to residential mortgage loans, including forward mortgage loans, reverse mortgage loans, and residential retail installment agreements, which include manufactured housing loans. References to “borrowers” refer to borrowers under residential mortgage loans and installment obligors under residential retail installment agreements. Forward mortgage loans and residential retail installment agreements are collectively referred to as “forward loans” or “forward mortgages.” Reverse mortgage loans, including HECMs, are referred to as “reverse loans” or “reverse mortgages.”
The recent growth of our forward and reverse mortgage originations businesses has diversified our revenue base and offers various sources for replenishing the Company's portfolio of servicing assets. In 2013, we materially expanded our forward mortgage originations business concurrent with the servicing portfolio acquisition from ResCap through the purchase of its capital markets and national originations platforms. During 2013, we originated $15.9 billion of forward loans and of this amount, added $5.9 billion to our servicing portfolio through our correspondent and wholesale lending channels. The majority of the remaining originations supported our recapture and retention activities associated with our existing servicing portfolio. Our originations platform at Green Tree Servicing LLC, or Green Tree Servicing, a wholly-owned subsidiary, currently focuses on retention and recapture activities for our servicing portfolio through our consumer retention channel. In February 2014, we exited activities associated with our mortgage wholesale channel, which was acquired in March 2013 from Ally Bank, with wind down activities of the pipeline completed in April 2014. The remaining portion of our originations platform, consisting of the consumer retail channel and correspondent lending channel, transitioned to Ditech Mortgage Corp, or Ditech, a wholly-owned subsidiary, and began originating forward mortgage loans on March 1, 2014. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , we originated $3.5 billion of forward mortgage volume through our consumer lending and correspondent lending channels. The consumer lending channel is comprised of both our retail lending channel and retention channel.

51



Our reverse mortgage originations business originated and purchased $2.7 billion in unpaid principal balance of reverse mortgage volume and issued $2.9 billion in unpaid principal balance of Home Equity Conversion Mortgage-Backed, or HMBS, during 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , we originated and purchased $245 million in unpaid principal balance of reverse mortgage volume and issued $415 million in unpaid principal balance of HMBS to finance our reverse mortgage originations business.
We operate several other related businesses which include managing a portfolio of credit-challenged, non-conforming residential mortgage loans; an asset manager; an insurance agency serving residential loan borrowers; and a post charge-off collection agency. We manage our Company in six reportable segments: Servicing, Originations, Reverse Mortgage, Assets Receivables Management, Insurance, and Loans and Residuals.
Financial Highlights
We recognized net income of $17.4 million , or $0.45 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to $27.7 million , or $0.73 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The decrease in net income was primarily due to our Originations and Reverse Mortgage segments which had lower income before taxes of $ 14.0 million and $ 21.9 million , respectively, partially offset by higher income before taxes of $ 11.7 million and $ 6.9 million relating to our Servicing and Insurance segments, respectively. Included in net servicing revenue and fees for our Servicing segment was a $13.1 million benefit related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract. Income tax expense declined by $7.2 million primarily due to the decline in income before taxes. Refer to the Results of Operations and Business Segment Results sections below for further information.
We recognized core earnings (loss) before income taxes, or Core Earnings, of $95.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 in comparison to $96.6 million for 2013 . The decrease in Core Earnings of $ 1.5 million was primarily attributable to the following:
Our Servicing segment had higher Core Earnings of $ 32.5 million resulting primarily from the increase in revenues, net of expenses due to the growth of the servicing portfolio, including a higher unfavorable change in fair value of servicing rights of $ 26.6 million and a $13.1 million benefit included in net servicing revenue and fees related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract.
Our Originations segment had lower Core Earnings of $ 8.9 million due primarily to higher expenses resulting from a higher volume of loans funded in relation to locked volume. In the prior year period the business substantially ramped up operations with the acquisition of the capital markets and originations platforms from ResCap on January 31, 2013 and correspondent lending and wholesale broker businesses from Ally Bank on March 1, 2013, therefore locked volume was significantly larger than funded volume. As a result, in the prior year period we had higher revenues in relation to expenses. In the current quarter, the relationship of locked volume to funded volume normalized. In addition, both locked and funded volumes were higher during the current year period as a result of having the activity of three months of ResCap consumer lending originations business in 2014 as compared to two months in 2013 and three months of Ally Bank correspondent lending and wholesale broker originations business in 2014 as compared to one month in 2013.
Our Reverse Mortgage segment had lower Core Earnings of $ 21.2 million due primarily to lower net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations due primarily to a decline in new origination volume reducing gains on aggregated loan pool pricing, partially offset by higher gains associated with draws on reverse loans and resulting fair value adjustments.
Our Insurance segment had higher Core Earnings of $ 6.6 million due to primarily to the increase in insurance revenues.
Our Other segment had a higher Core Loss of $12.0 million primarily due to higher interest expense on corporate debt transactions during the year ended December 31, 2013.
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, or Adjusted EBITDA, was $167.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 in comparison to $140.0 million for 2013 . The increase in Adjusted EBITDA of $ 27.8 million was primarily attributable to the following:
Our Servicing segment had higher Adjusted EBITDA of $ 48.6 million resulting primarily from growth in the business, a $13.1 million benefit related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract and $9.8 million in servicing fee economics related to MSRs associated with EverBank and those acquired from an affiliate of a large national bank.
Our Originations segment had lower Adjusted EBITDA of $ 6.1 million due primarily to the same factors as described above for Core Earnings.

52



Our Reverse Mortgage segment had lower Adjusted EBITDA of $ 20.9 million due primarily to the same factors as described above for Core Earnings.
Our Insurance segment had higher Adjusted EBITDA of $ 6.8 million due primarily to the same factors as described above for Core Earnings.
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that are not presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or GAAP. For a description of Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of our GAAP consolidated income before taxes to Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Business Segment Results sections below.
Our cash flows provided by operating activities were $407.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 . We finished the quarter ended March 31, 2014 with $562.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. Our operating cash flows increased by $617.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 primarily as a result of the slowing of our originations business as volume of loan sales was greater than loan fundings, which resulted in $3.6 billion used in the purchase and origination of loans held for sale, partially offset by $4.0 billion in proceeds from sales of and payments on loans held for sale, and the growth of our servicing portfolio which required $ 31.3 million of cash to fund servicer and protective advances. At March 31, 2014, we also had $124.7 million in funds available under our 2013 Revolver as defined in our Corporate Debt section below.
Business Segments
Refer to the Business Segment Results section for a presentation and discussion of our financial results by business segment. A description of the business conducted by each of these segments and related key financial highlights are provided below:
Servicing — Our Servicing segment consists of operations that perform servicing for third-party investors in forward loans, as well as our own forward loan portfolios on a fee-for-service basis. Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, the Servicing segment services forward loans that were originated or purchased by the Originations segment and sold to third-party investors with servicing rights retained. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , our Servicing segment recognized $33.8 million in income before taxes, an increase of $11.7 million as compared to the same period in 2013 , due primarily to increased servicing volume as a result of bulk servicing right acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2013 through the three months ended March 31, 2014, offset partially by higher unfavorable fair value adjustments recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014 of $ 26.6 million relating to servicing rights carried at fair value. Included in net servicing revenue and fees was a $13.1 million benefit related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract. Our weighted-average servicing fee for the Servicing segment increased by 3 basis points to 33 basis points during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 primarily as a result of the $13.1 million benefit recorded in the current year period discussed above. The total third-party servicing portfolio serviced by our Servicing segment grew by approximately 300,000 accounts since December 31, 2013 to approximately 2.2 million accounts at March 31, 2014 .
The annualized portfolio disappearance rate, consisting of contractual payments, voluntary prepayments, and defaults, was 13.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 . During the three months ended March 31, 2014 , we added $39.6 billion in unpaid principal balance of forward loans to our third-party servicing portfolio, predominately from portfolio acquisitions and our originations platform.
Originations — Our Originations segment consists of operations that purchase and originate forward loans that are sold to third parties with servicing rights generally retained. Our Originations segment recognized income before taxes of $20.2 million and $34.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 , the Originations segment funded and sold $3.5 billion and $3.9 billion in loans, respectively, and recognized $104.0 million in net gains on sales of loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 , the Originations segment funded and sold $ 375.8 million and $119.6 million in loans, respectively, and recognized $74.1 million in net gains on sales of loans. The decline in income before taxes of $ 14.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 was due primarily to higher expenses resulting from a higher volume of loans funded in relation to locked volume. In the prior year period the business substantially ramped up operations with the acquisition of the capital markets and originations platforms from ResCap on January 31, 2013 and correspondent lending and wholesale broker businesses from Ally Bank on March 1, 2013, therefore locked volume was significantly larger than funded volume. As a result, in the prior year period we had higher revenues in relation to expenses. In the current quarter, the relationship of locked volume to funded volume normalized. In addition, both locked and funded volumes were higher during the current year period as a result of having the activity of three months of ResCap consumer lending originations business in 2014 as compared to two months in 2013 and three months of Ally Bank correspondent lending and wholesale broker originations business in 2014 as compared to one month in 2013. Locked applications were $2.0 billion at March 31, 2014 .

53



Reverse Mortgage — Our Reverse Mortgage segment consists of operations that purchase and originate HECMs that are securitized, but remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for secured borrowings referred to as HMBS related obligations. This segment also performs servicing for third-party investors in reverse loans and provides other ancillary services for the reverse mortgage market. Our Reverse Mortgage segment recognized income (loss) before taxes of $(9.8) million and $12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 , the Reverse Mortgage segment recognized $27.9 million in revenues, which included $17.2 million in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations, and $37.7 million in expenses resulting in a loss before taxes of $9.8 million . During the three months ended March 31, 2013 , the Reverse Mortgage segment recognized $50.9 million in revenues, which included $36.8 million in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations, and $38.8 million in expenses resulting in $12.1 million in income before taxes. The decline in income (loss) before taxes was due to the decline in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations due primarily to a 75% decline in new origination volume reducing gains on aggregated loan pool pricing by $23.5 million, partially offset by higher gains of $2.8 million associated with draws on reverse loans and resulting fair value adjustments.
Asset Receivables Management — Our ARM segment performs collections of post charge-off deficiency balances on behalf of securitization trusts and third-party asset owners. Our ARM segment recognized income before taxes of $2.5 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Insurance — Our Insurance business segment provides voluntary and lender-placed hazard insurance for residential loan borrowers, as well as other ancillary products, through our insurance agency for a commission. Our Insurance business segment recognized income before taxes of $14.7 million and $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. The increase in income before taxes was due primarily to the increase in lender-placed insurance policies issued in relation to the 2013 bulk servicing right acquisitions, partially offset by run-off of policies previously in-force.
Loans and Residuals — Our Loans and Residuals segment consists of the assets and liabilities of the Residual Trusts, as well as our unencumbered residential loan portfolio and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward loans. The Residual Trusts are consolidated VIEs. Our Loans and Residuals business segment recognized income before taxes of $10.3 million and $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Other — Our Other segment primarily consists of the assets and liabilities of the Non-Residual Trusts, which are consolidated VIEs, corporate debt, our investment management business and intercompany eliminations.
Our Industry and Operating Environment
The majority of the approximately $9.9 trillion in U.S. residential mortgage debt outstanding has historically been serviced by large money-center banks, which generally focus on conventional mortgages with low delinquency rates. This has allowed for low-cost, routine payment processing and required minimal borrower interaction. Following the credit crisis, the need for “high-touch” specialty servicers, such as Walter Investment, increased as loan performance declined, delinquencies rose and servicing complexities broadened. Specialty servicers have proven more willing and better equipped to perform the operationally intensive activities (e.g., collections, foreclosure avoidance and loan workouts) required to service credit-sensitive loans.
To date, the industry has seen a significant shift in the servicing landscape, as specialty servicers acquired portfolios that money-center banks, and others, have sought to divest. While the five largest bank servicers once commanded a nearly 60% market share of the servicing sector, their share had declined to approximately 41% at December 31, 2013. Over the next several years we expect banking organizations will continue to seek to transfer servicing assets to high-touch servicers to shed responsibilities for non-core banking, credit-sensitive loans and comply with pending changes in banking organization capital rules. However, bulk transfers of MSRs and sub-servicing have slowed for commercial, regulatory or other reasons. As a result, the ability of servicers to replenish portfolio run-off is of critical importance. Servicers with an ability to cost-effectively source new MSRs (e.g., from third-party flow arrangements or through captive origination capabilities) are best positioned to sustain and grow their servicing portfolios.
Since mortgage originations hit their lows amid the housing downturn in 2008 with national originations volume of $1.5 trillion, mortgage originations increased to $1.9 trillion in 2013. Several macroeconomic trends have supported mortgage originations volumes including: low interest rates, which drive refinancing activity; home price appreciation, which supports growth in purchase activity; the extension of HARP through 2015; and an improving U.S. economy, with declining unemployment, among others. Current expectations are for both refinance and purchase to decline in 2014 to approximately $1.1 trillion.
Low mortgage rates have been driven by the Federal Reserve’s accommodative monetary policy and helped fuel increased mortgage originations. However, the Federal Reserve’s curtailment of its purchase of mortgage-backed securities is expected to push mortgage rates higher, which may suppress future mortgage originations volumes. Since May 2013, when the Federal Reserve first signaled future tapering of its asset purchases, the 30-year conventional mortgage rate rose to as high as 4.6% in early September 2013, from its low of 3.3% in January 2013 but increased again to 4.4% in late March 2014. The rise in mortgage rates has already contributed to a decline in refinance mortgage lending, with refinancing originations moving to their lowest level in two years. The Mortgage Bankers

54



Association expects refinance volume to drop 62% in 2014 compared to 2013. In addition, the Federal Open Market Committee, a committee within the Federal Reserve System, in its January 2014 meeting announced a tapering of its monthly purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities. This tapering could lead to higher mortgage interest rates during 2014 which in turn would likely have a negative impact on our originations activity. In an environment with rising interest rates, the value of MSRs tends to increase.
The reverse mortgage sector has seen significant change in the past several years. Several of the largest reverse mortgage originators have left the industry and there have been significant changes made by the Federal Housing Administration, or FHA, and the Government National Mortgage Association, or Ginnie Mae, to the products offered, underwriting guidelines and servicing protocols. We believe, the demographics continue to support this sector and the announced changes have strengthened the product overall. We believe these changes will have a temporary impact on reverse mortgage originations.
Regulatory Developments
The tumult and subsequent fall-out from the financial crisis in general, and the residential mortgage market in particular, have placed our industry under increased scrutiny by federal and state regulators over the past few years. We expect this scrutiny to continue. Rules, regulations and practices that have been in place for many years may be changed, and new rules and regulations may be introduced, in order to address real and perceived problems in our industry. We expect to incur ongoing operational and system costs in order to comply with these rules and regulations.
Servicing Segment
On February 6, 2014, a competitor of ours agreed to indefinitely halt an announced acquisition of MSRs at the request of the New York State Department of Financial Services, or NY DFS, which reportedly expressed concern about the competitor’s ability to adequately service acquired MSRs. While we received approvals for transfers during the three months ended March 31, 2014, we could receive a similar request from the NY DFS or other state or federal authorities in connection with a material acquisition of MSRs, particularly if enforcement actions by the NY DFS, CFPB, or other state or federal authorities are pending against us. If we were to become subject to similar requests, we would have difficulty growing our business through MSR acquisitions.
We are also subject to state licensing and regulation as a mortgage service provider and debt collector, insurance agency, and loan originator throughout the U.S. We are subject to audits and examinations conducted by the states. From time to time, we receive requests from state and other agencies for records, documents and information regarding our policies, procedures and practices regarding our loan servicing, debt collection, loan origination and insurance agency business activities. We incur significant ongoing costs to comply with these governmental regul ations.
Originations Segment
Our Originations segment is subject to a myriad of Federal and state laws that directly impact residential mortgage lending. There have not been recent significant state law developments regarding mortgage originations. However, we are subject to state statutory and regulatory requirements for mortgage lending activity including, but not limited to, interest rate limitations, permissible fees, and required disclosures. Licensing laws require us to submit periodic reporting to the regulators, maintain company licenses and ensure individual loan originators obtain and maintain licenses in each state in which they will accept mortgage loan applications. We are also subject to ongoing supervision and examination by the state regulators that will result in requests for information regarding policies, procedures, licenses, and origination activities.  Although the state requirements are not recent developments, they continue to require systemic and operational costs to comply with the requirements. We incur significant ongoing costs to comply with governmental regulations.
In its latest analysis of mortgage loan fraud, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, reported a drop in suspected mortgage fraud for 2012 from the previous year. However, mortgage fraud continues to present difficult challenges for the industry, particularly for the originations segment. In its analysis, FinCEN noted that most of the mortgage fraud reported in suspicious activity reports, or SARS, was related to loan origination and borrower misrepresentations, which was consistent with analyses of previous SAR filings. Our fraud risk management group uses various tools to attempt to identify originations-related fraud, such as altered documents, straw buyers, and employment/income misrepresentations, as part of its fraud mitigation efforts.
As to FHA loans, HUD has used its Quality Assurance Division to evaluate FHA-approved lenders for compliance with FHA requirements through both routine and targeted audits, post-endorsement technical reviews, and monitoring of a lender’s early default/claim rates. Loans involving fraud, misrepresentation, or serious and material violations of HUD policies and procedures that significantly increase HUD’s risk may result in a demand for indemnification by the FHA-approved mortgagee.  In recent years, HUD has become more aggressive in the penalties it seeks to impose for origination defects. Specifically, lenders have experienced an increase in the defects for which HUD pursues indemnification, as well as an increase in the number and amount of civil money penalties HUD seeks to impose through its administrative action authority.

55



Reverse Mortgage Segment
The Reverse Mortgage Stabilization Act of 2013, or RMSA, which was signed into law on August 9, 2013, allows the Secretary of HUD to establish requirements to improve the fiscal safety and soundness of the HECM Program. Two regulatory changes that will affect our reverse mortgage originations business have already been made or proposed pursuant to the new law.
The first, effective September 30, 2013, collapses the two types of reverse mortgages previously available—the “standard” and the “saver”—into one, which can be either fixed or adjustable rate. Under the new rules, the maximum amount of cash available to HECM borrowers will still largely depend on the age of the youngest borrower, the home value and the prevailing interest rate. However, many prospective HECM borrowers will have access to less home equity, on average, than the maximum amount previously available. As a result, reverse mortgages are expected to become more of a financial planning tool as opposed to an immediate source of cash. We expect there to be a negative overall impact on the volume and unpaid principal balance of HECMs in the near term.
The second change, once finalized and effective, will impose new financial assessment requirements on originators. Previously, the amount a borrower could borrow was based primarily on the value of the borrower’s collateral. The new regulation will provide underwriting guidelines to ensure that HECM borrowers will be able to afford ongoing financial obligations such as payment of property taxes, insurance, and property maintenance.
While the foregoing changes will continue to impact our reverse mortgage originations business, it is expected that these changes will ultimately benefit and strengthen the industry as a whole. Specifically, we believe that HECM borrowers will opt to receive their money through a line of credit carrying a variable rate, instead of a lump sum using a fixed rate loan, which will enable them to access more money over time. In addition, we believe that both the reduced borrowing capacity as well as the stricter underwriting criteria will ensure that borrowers are better positioned to meet their obligations resulting in fewer defaults over time. The full impact of these regulatory developments remains uncertain and any resulting adverse business trends could negatively impact the assumptions used in assessing the Reverse Mortgage segment goodwill for impairment.
Should the market be slower to respond than the Company anticipates, or should additional regulatory developments hinder future growth, the goodwill associated with the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit could become impaired. The Reverse Mortgage reporting unit had $138.8 million of goodwill at March 31, 2014.
Insurance Segment
On September 19, 2013, the NY DFS released proposed regulations that, among other things, would prohibit insurers from: issuing force-placed insurance on mortgaged property serviced by a servicer affiliated with the insurer; paying commissions to a bank or servicer or other parties affiliated with a bank or servicer on force-placed insurance policies obtained by the servicer; paying contingent commissions based on underwriting profitability or loss ratios; making payments, including but not limited to the payment of expenses, to a servicer or other parties affiliated with a servicer in connection with securing force-placed insurance business; and providing free or below-cost, outsourced services to banks, servicers or their affiliates.
In addition, the proposed regulations would impose additional notification requirements, prohibit force-placed insurers from issuing forced-placed insurance in excess of the borrower’s last known hazard insurance limits (or if such borrower’s last known hazard insurance limits did not comply with mortgage loan requirements, the replacement cost of improvements on the mortgaged property), require such insurers to refund all force-placed insurance premiums for any period when there is overlapping voluntary insurance coverage, and require such insurers to regularly inform the NY DFS of loss ratios actually experienced. The NY DFS’s proposed regulations follow a number of settlements between the NY DFS and force-placed insurers, including a consent order entered into on March 21, 2013, between Assurant, Inc., a third-party insurance carrier for which our insurance agency acts as an agent, and the NY DFS, concerning lender-placed policies issued by Assurant in New York. Among other things, Assurant agreed not to pay compensation to servicers and their affiliates on forced-placed insurance policies obtained by the servicer. Should the NY DFS’s regulations be adopted and should other states impose restrictions, the revenues from our insurance businesses could be significantly reduced or eliminated.
On October 7, 2013, American Security Insurance Company, or ASIC, the insurer that provides lender-placed hazard insurance coverage on Florida mortgage loans serviced by us, entered into a Consent Order with the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation. ASIC agreed in the Consent Order that it will not pay commissions to any mortgage loan servicer, or any person or entity affiliated with a servicer, on lender-placed insurance policies obtained by the servicer. This prohibition is expected to have a negative effect on the future cash flows of our Insurance segment beginning on its anticipated effective date of October 7, 2014.
On December 18, 2013, the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, announced that effective June 1, 2014 mortgage servicers and their affiliates may not receive

56



commissions or other forms of compensation in connection with lender-placed insurance on GSE loans. This prohibition is expected to have a negative effect on the future cash flows of our Insurance segment beginning on its anticipated effective date of June 1, 2014.
Due to these recent regulatory developments surrounding lender-placed insurance policies, we expect our sales commissions related to lender-placed insurance policies to decrease significantly during 2014. We have considered this commission reduction in our quantitative goodwill impairment test performed as of October 31, 2013, however, if the reduction is larger than anticipated, goodwill allocated to the Insurance segment could be impaired at a future date. The Insurance segment had $4.4 million of goodwill at March 31, 2014. We are actively looking at alternatives to preserve or replace the value of the revenue streams in our Insurance business. However there is no assurance that our efforts will be successful.
Market Opportunity and Strategy
We are actively pursuing opportunities to expand our business through various channels such as adding sub-servicing contracts to our portfolios through one-time transfers and flow agreements, the acquisition of MSRs and servicing platforms, and acquisitions of businesses that are complementary to our existing platform. We are also actively pursuing portfolio recapture efforts through our originations business and are seeking to expand our correspondent lending and consumer retail originations businesses as a source of additional replenishment and growth for our servicing business. While there has been significant disruption and change to the mortgage market beginning with the credit crisis, we believe that there will be more significant change coming in the next several years as basic tenets of the market such as the outsourcing of servicing from depositories and money-center banks, role of the GSEs and private capital supporting originations are defined. We believe these changes, coupled with previously mentioned fundamentals such as the depositories focus on core banking clients and increased capital requirements for MSRs, will provide significant opportunity for our business, though there can be no assurance that we will be able to capitalize on these opportunities or to complete any acquisitions, transfers or sub-servicing arrangements.
In addition to seeking growth opportunities for our servicing operations through investments and acquisitions, we are focused on adapting our other segments to changes in the business environment. In 2013, we took advantage of favorable economic conditions to build our originations business which we acquired from ResCap and Ally Bank, focusing on the retention channel and the opportunity to provide HARP refinancing of loans within our servicing portfolio and on the build-out of the correspondent and retail channels. In 2014, we anticipate that the HARP opportunity will remain a significant focus through December 2015 at which time we anticipate retention activities will remain. We plan to expand our correspondent and retail channels opportunistically in order to establish a purchase money originations business to meet the demand in that part of the mortgage market and provide replenishment to our servicing portfolio. To that objective, our originations business began operating under the name Ditech in the beginning of March 2014. Warehouse lines in the form of master repurchase facilities were established in support of Ditech’s operations and Ditech was added as a seller to our existing funding facilities. Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” Forward Mortgage Origination Business for further information.
The reverse mortgage business has been affected by regulatory developments affecting both the originations and servicing sides of the business. Mandated changes to the HECM product have slowed originations volume as the new products are adopted and we have invested to meet upgraded servicing standards. We believe the announced regulatory changes will ultimately be beneficial in establishing a sound reverse mortgage industry, and during 2014 we plan to continue to invest in the business in order to grow both our originations and servicing of reverse mortgage product.
The Insurance segment is also being affected by new rules issued by the GSEs and other regulatory developments, and we expect that at least from June 1, 2014, our agency business will no longer be able to earn commissions or other revenue on lender-placed insurance for GSE loans and in certain states in the manner in which we have conducted our business in the past. We are actively exploring alternatives in order to preserve or replace the value of these insurance activities for our shareholders.
We have an investment management business which is expected to realize performance fees from an existing contract during 2014.
We maintain a strategic focus on the management of our costs, and we regularly evaluate whether outsourcing portions of our activities to qualified vendors would enable us to reduce our expense base while sustaining adequate quality, effectiveness and compliance levels.
Refer to “Risk Factors” under Item 1A to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

57



Recent Acquisitions
EverBank Net Assets
On October 30, 2013, we entered into a series of definitive agreements to purchase (1) certain private and GSE-backed MSRs and related servicer advances, (2) sub-servicing rights for forward loans and (3) a default servicing platform from EverBank, collectively the EverBank net assets. The agreements were structured such that ownership of the MSRs and related servicer advances and the sub-servicing rights for forward loans would transfer to us as investor consents were received and the net assets associated with the default servicing platform would transfer when the data associated with the loans underlying the MSRs were boarded onto our servicing systems.
The agreements called for an estimated total purchase price of $83.4 million for the MSRs, less net cash flows received on the underlying loans between October 30, 2013 and the date of legal transfer; and an additional $1.9 million associated with the default servicing platform. We paid $16.7 million of the estimated purchase price on October 30, 2013.
During March 2014, we received approvals to transfer MSRs and sub-servicing rights with unpaid principal balance of approximately $16.5 billion . Accordingly, we paid an additional $44.7 million and recorded MSRs at fair value of $58.7 million . Approvals for certain private investor backed MSRs have not been received and accordingly, no assets or related revenues and expenses have been recorded. We are accounting for this transaction as a business combination in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance upon closing of the default servicing platform, which occurred on May 1, 2014.
MSR Purchase
On December 10, 2013, we entered into an agreement with an affiliate of a national bank to acquire a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs and related servicer advances for an estimated purchase price of $330.0 million for the MSRs, less net cash flows received on the underlying loans between December 10, 2013 and the date of legal transfer. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we closed on the agreement upon receipt of investor approvals to transfer servicing, at which time the unpaid principal balance of the loans was $27.6 billion . We paid $165.0 million and $73.2 million of the estimated total purchase price in December 2013 and April 2014, respectively. The remaining purchase price will be paid during 2014.
Walter Capital Opportunity Corp.

On April 23, 2014, we and certain investment funds managed by York Capital Management, collectively York, entered into a securities purchase and investor rights agreement, or the Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which both parties agreed to invest in Walter Capital Opportunity Corp., or WCO. WCO was formed to invest in excess servicing spread related to mortgage servicing rights, forward mortgage servicing rights, forward and reverse residential whole loans, reverse mortgage servicing rights, agency and non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and other real estate related securities and related derivatives, and to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code.

Under the Securities Purchase Agreement, we agreed to contribute $20.0 million in cash in exchange for approximately 9% of the outstanding equity in WCO, and the York entities have agreed to contribute $200 million in cash in exchange for 91% of the outstanding equity in WCO.  We anticipate (i) contributing certain assets with insignificant book value to WCO in exchange for up to an additional 1% of outstanding equity in WCO; (ii) entering into an agreement under which our wholly owned subsidiary would provide comprehensive management services to WCO; and (iii) entering into ancillary agreements under which, among other things, we would (a) sell to WCO beneficial interests in certain servicing rights owned by us, and (b) sell to WCO servicing rights on flow production. We will also receive warrants to purchase additional equity in WCO, which if fully exercised, would bring the Company's ownership in WCO to 12% of outstanding and potential shares.

The consummation of the Securities Purchase Agreement is subject to various approvals and other closing conditions, including finalizing the terms of ancillary and commercial agreements, and is expected to occur during the second quarter of 2014.

58



Results of Operations — Comparison of Consolidated Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
Our consolidated results of operations are provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
172,792

 
$
137,009

 
$
35,783

Net gains on sales of loans
 
104,034

 
78,445

 
25,589

Interest income on loans
 
34,422

 
36,898

 
(2,476
)
Insurance revenue
 
23,388

 
17,534

 
5,854

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
17,236

 
36,788

 
(19,552
)
Other revenues
 
18,076

 
7,855

 
10,221

Total revenues
 
369,948

 
314,529

 
55,419

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries and benefits
 
135,897

 
106,733

 
29,164

General and administrative
 
108,865

 
87,440

 
21,425

Interest expense
 
74,849

 
54,142

 
20,707

Depreciation and amortization
 
18,644

 
16,333

 
2,311

Other expenses, net
 
225

 
2,096

 
(1,871
)
Total expenses
 
338,480

 
266,744

 
71,736

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other losses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other net fair value losses
 
(2,503
)
 
(1,261
)
 
(1,242
)
Total other losses
 
(2,503
)
 
(1,261
)
 
(1,242
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxes
 
28,965

 
46,524

 
(17,559
)
Income tax expense
 
11,588

 
18,775

 
(7,187
)
Net income
 
$
17,377

 
$
27,749

 
$
(10,372
)

59



Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
A summary of net servicing revenue and fees is provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing fees
 
$
166,033

 
$
119,872

 
$
46,161

Incentive and performance fees
 
42,857

 
33,725

 
9,132

Ancillary and other fees
 
22,653

 
15,811

 
6,842

Servicing revenue and fees
 
231,543

 
169,408

 
62,135

Changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions (1)
 
(25,618
)
 
(3,980
)
 
(21,638
)
Other changes in fair value (2)
 
(22,016
)
 
(17,095
)
 
(4,921
)
Change in fair value of servicing rights
 
(47,634
)
 
(21,075
)
 
(26,559
)
Amortization of servicing rights
 
(11,117
)
 
(11,324
)
 
207

Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
172,792

 
$
137,009

 
$
35,783

_______  
(1)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(2)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value due to the realization of expected cash flows over time.
We recognize servicing revenue and fees on servicing performed for third parties in which we either own the servicing rights or act as sub-servicer. This revenue includes contractual fees earned on the serviced loans, incentive and performance fees earned based on the performance of certain loans or loan portfolios serviced by us, and loan modification fees. Servicing revenue and fees also includes asset recovery income, which is included in incentive and performance fees, and ancillary fees such as late fees and prepayment fees. Servicing revenue earned on loans held by consolidated VIEs, for which the related residential loans and real estate owned have been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets, which consists of both the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts, is eliminated in consolidation. Servicing revenue and fees are adjusted for the amortization of servicing rights carried at amortized cost and the changes in fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value.
Servicing revenue and fees increased $62.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to growth in the third-party servicing portfolio unpaid principal balance period over period, resulting primarily from bulk MSR portfolio acquisitions and servicing rights capitalized as a result of our loan origination activities partially offset by normal run-off of the servicing portfolio. The change in fair value of servicing rights of $47.6 million and $21.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 related to a risk-managed class of servicing rights established on January 1, 2013. Refer to additional information on this change in fair value in the Servicing segment section of our Business Segment Results below.
Included in incentive and performance fees are incentive fees for exceeding pre-defined performance hurdles in servicing various loan portfolios. These fees may not recur on a regular basis, as they are earned based on the performance of underlying loan pools as compared to similar pools serviced by others, as well as the achievement of certain performance hurdles over time, which may not be achieved on a regular schedule. Incentive and performance fees also include modification fees, and other program specific incentives such as fees earned under HAMP.
A summary of third-party net servicing revenue and fees by segment is provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing
 
$
156,261

 
$
120,278

 
$
35,983

Reverse Mortgage
 
7,610

 
6,748

 
862

Asset Receivables Management
 
8,921

 
9,983

 
(1,062
)
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
172,792

 
$
137,009

 
$
35,783

Refer to additional information on net servicing revenue and fees by segment in Business Segment Results section below.

60



Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Net gains on sales of loans consists of gains on sales of loans held for sale, fair value adjustments on loans held for sale and related freestanding derivatives, and a provision for the repurchase of loans. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , net gains on sales of loans increased $25.6 million as compared to the same period of 2013 due to having three months of the ResCap originations business in 2014 as compared to two months in 2013, partially offset by a decrease in refinance origination volume resulting from rising interest rates and diminishing HARP opportunities during the current year period.
Interest Income on Loans
We earn interest income on the residential loans held in the Residual Trusts and on our unencumbered forward loans, both of which are accounted for at amortized cost. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , interest income decreased $2.5 million as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to a decrease in the related average residential loan balance outstanding.
Provided below is a summary of the average balances of residential loans carried at amortized cost and the related interest income and average yields (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Residential loans at amortized cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
 
$
34,422

 
$
36,898

 
$
(2,476
)
Average balance (1)
 
1,399,860

 
1,499,816

 
(99,956
)
Annualized average yield
 
9.84
%
 
9.84
%
 
%
__________
(1)
Average balance is calculated as the average recorded investment in the loan at the beginning and end of the quarter.
Insurance Revenue
Insurance revenue consists of commission income and fees earned on voluntary and lender-placed insurance policies issued and other products sold to borrowers, net of estimated future policy cancellations. Commission income is based on a percentage of the premium of the insurance policy issued, which varies based on the type of policy. Insurance revenue increased $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to the increase in lender-placed insurance policies issued in relation to the 2013 bulk servicing right acquisitions, partially offset by run-off of policies previously in-force.
Due to recent regulatory developments surrounding lender-placed insurance policies as mentioned in the Regulatory Developments section above, we expect our sales commissions related to lender-placed insurance policies to decrease significantly beginning in the second quarter of 2014. We are actively looking at alternatives to preserve or replace the value of the revenue streams in our Insurance business. However there is no assurance that our efforts will be successful in preserving or replacing any affected revenue streams or otherwise preserving for our shareholders all or any part of our Insurance business.
Net Fair Value Gains on Reverse Loans and Related HMBS Obligations
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations includes the contractual interest income earned on reverse loans, including those not yet securitized or bought out of securitization pools, net of interest expense on HMBS related obligations and the change in fair value of these assets and liabilities. The net contractual interest approximates our servicing fees. Included in the change in fair value are gains due to loan originations, which include draws on reverse loans where the borrower has additional borrowing capacity. These gains result from the pricing of an aggregated pool of loans exceeding the cost of the origination or acquisition of the loan as well as changes in fair value resulting from changes to market pricing on newly originated HECMs and HMBS. No gain or loss is recognized upon securitization of reverse loans as these transactions are accounted for as secured borrowings. Refer to the “Business Segment Results” below for a detailed breakout of the components of net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations.
During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , we recognized $17.2 million and $36.8 million in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations which includes contractual interest income earned on reverse loans, net of interest expense on HMBS related obligations of $6.3 million and $7.6 million , respectively, and favorable changes in fair value of $10.9 million and $29.2 million , respectively.

61



Net contractual interest declined by $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to a decline in unsecuritized HECMs. The changes in fair value recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 related to the reverse loans and HMBS related obligations were due to growth of the portfolio as well as the change in market pricing for newly originated HECMs and HMBS. The decline in the change in fair value of $18.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was due primarily to a 75% decline in new origination volume reducing gains on aggregated loan pool pricing by $23.5 million, partially offset by higher gains of $2.8 million associated with draws on reverse loans and resulting fair value adjustments.
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist primarily of origination fee income, income associated with our beneficial interest in a servicing asset and income for an equity method investment. Other revenues increased $10.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to $7.5 million in income for our beneficial interest that did not exist in the prior year period and $2.2 million in higher origination fee income resulting from the growth in our originations business. Origination fee income was $5.9 million and $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense increased $29.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to employees acquired in connection with our recent acquisitions and hiring to support the growth of our business. Headcount increased by approximately 1,500 full-time employees from approximately 4,800 at March 31, 2013 to approximately 6,300 at March 31, 2014 .
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased $21.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to additional operating and overhead costs associated with growth in the servicing portfolio and originations operations.
Interest Expense
We incur interest expense on our corporate debt, mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts, master repurchase agreements and servicing advance liabilities, all of which are accounted for at amortized cost. Interest expense increased $20.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to corporate debt transactions, which included incremental borrowings under our 2012 Term Loan, the issuance of Senior Notes and refinancing activities during 2013. The increase in average balances of our corporate debt was partially offset by a decrease in the average rate during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 as a result of corporate debt activities addressed above. These financing transactions resulted in a lower cost of debt. In addition, interest expense increased as a result of higher average balances of servicing advance liabilities and master repurchase agreements due to our growing servicing and originations businesses. Refer to additional information on our corporate debt activity within the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.

62



Provided below is a summary of the average balances of our debt, mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts, and servicing advance liabilities, as well as the related interest expense and average rates (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Corporate debt (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
36,483

 
$
25,218

 
$
11,265

Average balance
 
2,273,276

 
1,438,195

 
835,081

Annualized average rate
 
6.42
%
 
7.01
%
 
(0.59
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
20,303

 
$
22,296

 
$
(1,993
)
Average balance
 
1,190,043

 
1,301,650

 
(111,607
)
Annualized average rate
 
6.82
%
 
6.85
%
 
(0.03
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Servicing advance liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
10,381

 
$
2,410

 
$
7,971

Average balance
 
974,622

 
212,963

 
761,659

Annualized average rate
 
4.26
%
 
4.53
%
 
(0.27
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Master repurchase agreements
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
7,682

 
$
4,218

 
$
3,464

Average balance
 
827,836

 
385,820

 
442,016

Annualized average rate
 
3.71
%
 
4.37
%
 
(0.66
)%
__________
(1)
Corporate debt includes our secured term loan, Senior Notes, and Convertible Notes.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense presented on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) consists of amortization of intangible assets other than goodwill and depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment, which includes amortization of capitalized software. Depreciation and amortization increased $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , primarily as a result of the acquisition of premises and equipment, including capitalized software, partially offset by a decline in amortization of intangible assets acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of GTCS Holdings, LLC, or Green Tree, on July 1, 2011. Certain of these intangible assets are now fully amortized.
A summary of depreciation and amortization expense is provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Depreciation and amortization of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets
 
$
5,191

 
$
7,903

 
$
(2,712
)
Premises and equipment
 
13,453

 
8,430

 
5,023

Total depreciation and amortization
 
$
18,644

 
$
16,333

 
$
2,311

Other Expenses, Net
Included in other expenses, net is the provision for loan losses on our residential loan portfolio accounted for at amortized cost, real estate owned expenses, net and claims expense. The provision for loan losses decreased by $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to lower loss severities, which improved throughout 2013 and continued into 2014 from higher average home selling prices in our markets, and a decrease in the default frequency rate used to calculate the allowance for loan losses based on favorable delinquency trends.

63



Other Net Fair Value Losses
We recognized other net fair value losses of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 , which included a net fair value loss on the assets and liabilities of the Non-Residual Trusts of $2.0 million primarily due to changes in London InterBank Offered Rates, or LIBOR.
We recognized other net fair value losses of $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, which included a net fair value gain of $2.9 million on the assets and liabilities of the Non-Residual Trusts and a loss of $3.7 million associated with the increase in the estimated liability for a contingent earn-out payment related to the acquisition of Security One Lending. Higher than expected cash flows and a favorable spread on contractual interest income net of contractual interest expense contributed to the net fair value gain on the assets and liabilities of the Non-Residual Trusts for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense decreased $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to the decrease in income before income taxes. The effective tax rate remained consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 .
Financial Condition — Comparison of Consolidated Financial Condition at March 31, 2014 to December 31, 2013
Our total assets and total liabilities remained relatively flat at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013. We had growth in servicing rights of $371.6 million due primarily to MSR portfolio acquisitions from Everbank and an affiliate of a national bank. These MSRs were recoded upon receipt of investor approval during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Refer to the Recent Acquisitions section above.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We manage our Company in six reportable segments: Servicing, Originations, Reverse Mortgage, ARM, Insurance and Loans and Residuals. We measure the performance of our business segments through the following measures: income (loss) before income taxes, Core Earnings, and Adjusted EBITDA. Management considers Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA, both non-GAAP financial measures, to be important in the evaluation of our business segments and of the Company as a whole, as well as for allocating capital resources to our segments. Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are utilized to assess the underlying operational performance of the continuing operations of the business. In addition, analysts, investors, and creditors may use these measures when analyzing our operating performance. Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP and use of these terms may vary from other companies in our industry.
Core Earnings is a metric that is used by management to exclude certain items in an attempt to provide a better metric to evaluate our Company’s underlying key drivers and the core operating performance of the business, exclusive of certain adjustments and activities that management considers to be unrelated to the underlying economic performance of the business for a given period. Core Earnings is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes plus certain depreciation and amortization costs related to the increased basis in assets, including servicing and sub-servicing rights, acquired within business combination transactions, or step-up depreciation and amortization, transaction and integration costs, share-based compensation expense, non-cash interest expense, the net impact of the Non-Residual Trusts, fair value to cash adjustments for reverse loans, and certain other cash and non-cash adjustments, primarily including severance expense and certain other non-recurring start-up costs. Core Earnings excludes unrealized changes in fair value of MSRs that are based on projections of expected future cash flows and prepayments. Core Earnings includes both cash and non-cash gains from forward mortgage origination activities. Non-cash gains are net of non-cash charges or reserves provided. Core Earnings includes cash gains for reverse mortgage origination activities. Core Earnings may also include other adjustments, as applicable based upon facts and circumstances, consistent with the intent of providing investors a means of evaluating our core operating performance.
Adjusted EBITDA eliminates the effects of financing, income taxes and depreciation and amortization by focusing on our profitability. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, interest expense on corporate debt, transaction and integration related costs, the net impact of the Non-Residual Trusts and certain other cash and non-cash adjustments primarily including severance expense, the net provision for the repurchase of transferred loans and certain other non-recurring start-up costs. Adjusted EBITDA includes both cash and non-cash gains from forward mortgage origination activities. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the impact of fair value option accounting on certain assets and liabilities and includes cash gains for reverse mortgage origination activities. Adjusted EBITDA may also include other adjustments, as applicable based upon facts and circumstances, consistent with the intent of providing investors a means of evaluating our operating performance.
We believe Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA provide investors with additional information to measure our performance. Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP and our use of these terms may vary from other companies in our industry. Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to (1) net income (loss) or

64



any other performance measures determined in accordance with GAAP or (2) operating cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP. Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA have important limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations are:
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect certain tax payments that may represent reductions in cash available to us;
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future;
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our corporate debt, although they do reflect interest expense associated with our master repurchase agreements, mortgage-backed debt, and HMBS related obligations; and
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect non-cash compensation which is and will remain a key element of our overall long-term incentive compensation package; and
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions.
Because of these limitations, Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA only as supplements. Users of our financial statements are cautioned not to place undue reliance on Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA.
The following tables reconcile Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA to income before income taxes, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
Core Earnings
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2014
Income before income taxes
 
$
28,965

Add:
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
25,618

Step-up depreciation and amortization  (1)
 
20,363

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans (2)
 
4,661

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts (3)
 
4,135

Share-based compensation expense
 
3,493

Non-cash interest expense
 
3,310

Transaction and integration costs  (4)
 
1,530

Other (5)
 
2,979

Sub-total
 
66,089

Core Earnings
 
$
95,054

_________
(1)
Represents depreciation and amortization costs related to the increased basis in assets, including servicing and sub-servicing rights, acquired within business combination transactions.
(2) Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments to arrive at cash gains for reverse loans and related HMBS obligations.
(3) Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments related to the Non-Residual Trusts net of the cash servicing fee earned on the underlying residential loans.
(4)
Represents legal and professional expenses associated with our acquisitions and potential future growth initiatives.
(5) Represents other cash and non-cash adjustments primarily including severance expense and non-recurring charges such as start-up costs.


65



Adjusted EBITDA
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2014
Income before income taxes
 
$
28,965

Add:
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
18,644

Interest expense on debt
 
37,480

EBITDA
 
85,089

Add:
 
 
Amortization and fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
58,751

Servicing fee economics (1)
 
9,750

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans (2)
 
4,661

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts  (3)
 
4,135

Share-based compensation expense
 
3,493

Residual Trusts cash flows (4)
 
1,570

Transaction and integration costs (5)
 
1,530

Other (6)
 
3,813

Sub-total
 
87,703

Less:
 
 
Non-cash interest income
 
(3,987
)
Provision for loan losses
 
(1,004
)
Sub-total
 
(4,991
)
Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
167,801

_________
(1)
Represents economics received on MSRs associated with EverBank and those acquired from an affiliate of a large national bank. Economics for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 were not reflected in servicing revenue until investor approvals were received in March 2014.
(2)
Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments to arrive at cash gains for reverse loans and related HMBS obligations.
(3) Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments related to the Non-Residual Trusts net of the cash servicing fee earned on the underlying residential loans.
(4) Represents cash flows in excess of overcollateralization requirements that have been released to us from the Residual Trusts.
(5) Represents legal and professional expenses associated with our acquisitions and potential future growth initiatives.
(6)
Represents other cash and non-cash adjustments primarily including the net provision for the repurchase of transferred loans, severance expense and non-recurring charges such as start-up costs.
Business Segment Results
In calculating income (loss) before income taxes for our segments, we allocate indirect expenses to our business segments and include these expenses in other expenses, net. Indirect expenses are allocated to our Insurance segment based on the ratio of the number of policies to the number of accounts serviced and to our Originations, Reverse Mortgage, ARM and certain non-reportable segments based on headcount. All remaining indirect expenses are allocated to our Servicing segment. We do not allocate indirect expenses to our Loans and Residuals segment.
We reconcile our income (loss) before income taxes for our business segments to our GAAP consolidated income (loss) before taxes and report the financial results of our Non-Residual Trusts, other non-reportable operating segments and certain corporate expenses and amounts to eliminate intercompany transactions between segments as other activity. For a reconciliation of our income (loss) before income taxes for our business segments to our GAAP consolidated income (loss) before income taxes, refer to Note 22 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

66



Reconciliation of GAAP Consolidated Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes to Core Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes and Adjusted EBITDA
Provided below is a reconciliation of our consolidated income (loss) before income taxes under GAAP to our Core Earnings (loss) before income taxes and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Total
Consolidated
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
33,771

 
$
20,210

 
$
(9,800
)
 
$
2,499

 
$
14,667

 
$
10,255

 
$
(42,637
)
 
$
28,965

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
25,618

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
25,618

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
4,868

 
2,853

 
1,893

 
1,094

 
1,183

 

 
7

 
11,898

Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
8,465

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8,465

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 

 

 
4,661

 

 

 

 

 
4,661

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
4,135

 
4,135

Share-based compensation expense
 
1,541

 
829

 
490

 
63

 
304

 

 
266

 
3,493

Non-cash interest expense
 
178

 

 

 

 

 
819

 
2,313

 
3,310

Transaction and integration costs
 
111

 

 

 
36

 

 

 
1,383

 
1,530

Other
 
5

 
2,978

 
(52
)
 

 

 

 
48

 
2,979

Total adjustments
 
40,786

 
6,660

 
6,992

 
1,193

 
1,487

 
819

 
8,152

 
66,089

Core Earnings
 
74,557

 
26,870

 
(2,808
)
 
3,692

 
16,154

 
11,074

 
(34,485
)
 
95,054

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
23,918

 

 
750

 

 

 

 

 
24,668

Interest expense on debt
 
32

 

 
10

 

 

 

 
34,128

 
34,170

Servicing fee economics
 
9,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
9,750

Depreciation and amortization
 
3,837

 
2,142

 
556

 
208

 

 

 
3

 
6,746

Non-cash interest income
 
(296
)
 

 
(65
)
 

 

 
(3,626
)
 

 
(3,987
)
Residual Trusts cash flows
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,570

 

 
1,570

Provision for loan losses
 

 

 

 

 

 
(1,004
)
 

 
(1,004
)
Other
 
827

 
1,093

 
68

 
7

 
21

 
(1,166
)
 
(16
)
 
834

Total adjustments
 
38,068

 
3,235

 
1,319

 
215

 
21

 
(4,226
)
 
34,115

 
72,747

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
112,625

 
$
30,105

 
$
(1,489
)
 
$
3,907

 
$
16,175

 
$
6,848

 
$
(370
)
 
$
167,801


67



 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Total
Consolidated
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
22,029

 
$
34,259

 
$
12,089

 
$
2,368

 
$
7,719

 
$
8,613

 
$
(40,553
)
 
$
46,524

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
3,980

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,980

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
6,189

 
1,277

 
2,451

 
1,473

 
1,464

 

 
6

 
12,860

Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
8,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8,110

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 

 

 
3,536

 

 

 

 

 
3,536

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(479
)
 
(479
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
1,497

 
268

 
287

 
138

 
339

 

 
161

 
2,690

Non-cash interest expense
 
220

 

 

 

 
19

 
677

 
2,087

 
3,003

Transaction and integration costs
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
11,627

 
11,627

Debt issue costs not capitalized
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
4,700

 
4,700

Other
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
11

 
11

Total adjustments
 
19,996

 
1,545

 
6,274

 
1,611

 
1,822

 
677

 
18,113

 
50,038

Core Earnings
 
42,025

 
35,804

 
18,363

 
3,979

 
9,541

 
9,290

 
(22,440
)
 
96,562

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
19,391

 

 
918

 

 

 

 

 
20,309

Interest expense on debt
 

 

 
17

 

 

 

 
23,114

 
23,131

Depreciation and amortization
 
2,668

 
400

 
272

 
283

 
(150
)
 

 

 
3,473

Non-cash interest income
 
(461
)
 

 
(151
)
 

 
(7
)
 
(3,949
)
 

 
(4,568
)
Residual Trusts cash flows
 

 

 

 

 

 
400

 

 
400

Provision for loan losses
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,726

 

 
1,726

Other
 
443

 
41

 
37

 
8

 
18

 
(1,692
)
 
104

 
(1,041
)
Total adjustments
 
22,041

 
441

 
1,093

 
291

 
(139
)
 
(3,515
)
 
23,218

 
43,430

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
64,066

 
$
36,245

 
$
19,456

 
$
4,270

 
$
9,402

 
$
5,775

 
$
778

 
$
139,992


68



Servicing
Our Servicing segment consists of operations that perform servicing for third-party investors in forward loans, as well as for on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages.
Provided below is a summary of results of operations for our Servicing segment, which also includes Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
Third parties
 
$
156,261

 
$
120,278

 
$
35,983

Intercompany
 
4,565

 
4,849

 
(284
)
Total net servicing revenue and fees
 
160,826

 
125,127

 
35,699

Other revenues
 
8,554

 
462

 
8,092

Total revenues
 
169,380

 
125,589

 
43,791

General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
65,897

 
49,485

 
16,412

Salaries and benefits
 
50,420

 
42,563

 
7,857

Interest expense
 
10,413

 
2,410

 
8,003

Depreciation and amortization
 
8,705

 
8,857

 
(152
)
Total expenses
 
135,435

 
103,315

 
32,120

Other net fair value losses
 
(174
)
 
(245
)
 
71

Income before income taxes
 
33,771

 
22,029

 
11,742

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
25,618

 
3,980

 
21,638

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
4,868

 
6,189

 
(1,321
)
Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
8,465

 
8,110

 
355

Share-based compensation expense
 
1,541

 
1,497

 
44

Non-cash interest expense
 
178

 
220

 
(42
)
Transaction and integration costs
 
111

 

 
111

Other
 
5

 

 
5

Total adjustments
 
40,786

 
19,996

 
20,790

Core Earnings
 
74,557

 
42,025

 
32,532

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
23,918

 
19,391

 
4,527

Servicing fee economics
 
9,750

 

 
9,750

Interest expense on debt
 
32

 

 
32

Depreciation and amortization
 
3,837

 
2,668

 
1,169

Non-cash interest income
 
(296
)
 
(461
)
 
165

Other
 
827

 
443

 
384

Total adjustments
 
38,068

 
22,041

 
16,027

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
112,625

 
$
64,066

 
$
48,559


69



Forward Mortgage Servicing Portfolio
Provided below are summaries of the activity in our third-party servicing portfolio for our forward mortgage business, which includes accounts serviced for third parties for which we earn servicing revenue and, thus, excludes servicing performed related to residential loans and real estate owned that have been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Not Capitalized
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
1,894,446

 
$
143,365,961

 
$
10,428,980

 
$
45,033,529

 
$
198,828,470

Acquisition of pool of Fannie Mae MSRs
 
254,960

 
27,559,108

 

 

 
27,559,108

Acquisition of EverBank net assets
 
72,176

 
9,756,509

 

 

 
9,756,509

Loan sales with servicing retained
 
22,253

 
1,902,000

 

 

 
1,902,000

Other new business added
 
2,259

 
89,585

 

 
292,024

 
381,609

Payoffs, sales and curtailments, net (1)
 
(80,402
)
 
(5,744,284
)
 
(419,084
)
 
(1,262,941
)
 
(7,426,309
)
Ending balance
 
2,165,692

 
$
176,928,879

 
$
10,009,896

 
$
44,062,612

 
$
231,001,387

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At March 31, 2014
Ending number of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
1,585,467

 
210,451

 
369,774

 
2,165,692

 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Not Capitalized
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
902,405

 
$
20,437,051

 
$
13,309,915

 
$
40,912,250

 
$
74,659,216

Acquisition of ResCap net assets
 
381,540

 
42,287,026

 

 

 
42,287,026

Acquisition of BOA assets
 
607,434

 
84,438,119

 

 

 
84,438,119

Loan sales with servicing retained
 
16

 
3,148

 

 

 
3,148

Other new business added
 
22,458

 
2,379,822

 

 
1,660,668

 
4,040,490

Payoffs, sales and curtailments, net (1)
 
(58,743
)
 
(6,772,565
)
 
(701,518
)
 
422,177

 
(7,051,906
)
Ending balance
 
1,855,110

 
$
142,772,601

 
$
12,608,397

 
$
42,995,095

 
$
198,376,093

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At March 31, 2013
Ending number of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
1,346,498

 
259,955

 
248,657

 
1,855,110

_______
(1) Amounts presented are net of loan sales of $2.2 billion and $6.2 billion with servicing retained associated with multi-channel recapture activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

70



Provided below is a summary of the unpaid principal balance of our third-party servicing portfolio and on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward mortgages. The Servicing segment receives intercompany servicing fees for on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing portfolio composition associated with forward mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
Third parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien mortgages
 
$
214,065,139

 
$
179,337,508

 
$
34,727,631

Second lien mortgages
 
8,483,844

 
9,520,764

 
(1,036,920
)
Manufactured housing
 
8,326,449

 
9,501,985

 
(1,175,536
)
Other
 
125,955

 
15,836

 
110,119

Total third parties
 
231,001,387

 
198,376,093

 
32,625,294

On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages (1)
 
2,832,503

 
2,749,221

 
83,282

Total servicing portfolio associated with forward mortgages
 
$
233,833,890

 
$
201,125,314

 
$
32,708,576

_________
(1)
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned primarily includes loans of the Loans and Residuals Segment and the Non-Residual Trusts, as well as forward loans held for sale.
Provided below are summaries of the number of accounts, unpaid principal balance, weighted average contractual servicing fee and past due status of our third-party servicing portfolio and on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward mortgages (dollars in thousands). The Servicing segment receives intercompany servicing fees related to on-balance sheet assets.
 
 
At March 31, 2014
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual Servicing Fee
 
30 Days or
More Past Due (1)
Third-party servicing portfolio composition of accounts serviced associated with forward mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien mortgages
 
1,591,975

 
$
214,065,139

 
0.25
%
 
10.67
%
Second lien mortgages
 
271,981

 
8,483,844

 
0.56
%
 
3.08
%
Manufactured housing
 
278,127

 
8,326,449

 
1.07
%
 
3.44
%
Other
 
23,609

 
125,955

 
0.93
%
 
18.98
%
Total accounts serviced for third parties
 
2,165,692

 
231,001,387

 
0.29
%
 
10.14
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages (2)
 
57,244

 
2,832,503

 
 
 
5.16
%
Total servicing portfolio associated with forward mortgages
 
2,222,936

 
$
233,833,890

 
 
 
10.08
%

71



 
 
At December 31, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual Servicing Fee
 
30 Days or
More Past Due (1)
Third-party servicing portfolio composition of accounts serviced associated with forward mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien mortgages
 
1,294,343

 
$
181,208,279


0.23
%
 
12.30
%
Second lien mortgages
 
286,992

 
8,873,955


0.58
%
 
3.78
%
Manufactured housing
 
286,934

 
8,602,932


1.07
%
 
4.00
%
Other
 
26,177

 
143,304


0.93
%
 
28.21
%
Total accounts serviced for third parties
 
1,894,446

 
198,828,470


0.28
%
 
11.57
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages (2)
 
60,491

 
3,274,846

 
 
 
5.26
%
Total servicing portfolio associated with forward mortgages
 
1,954,937

 
$
202,103,316

 
 
 
11.47
%
_______  
(1)
Past due status is measured based on either the Mortgage Bankers Association, or MBA, method or the Office of Thrift Supervision, or OTS, method as specified in the servicing agreement. Under the MBA method, a loan is considered past due if its monthly payment is not received by the end of the day immediately preceding the loan's next due date. Under the OTS method, a loan is considered past due if its monthly payment is not received by the loan's due date in the following month. Past due status, specifically related to loans within the Residual Trusts and loans collateralized by manufactured housing, is based on the current contractual due date of the loan. In the case of an approved repayment plan, including a plan approved by the bankruptcy court, or a completed loan modification, past due status is based on the modified due date or status of the loan.
(2)
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned primarily includes loans of the Loans and Residuals Segment and the Non-Residual Trusts as well as forward loans held for sale.
The unpaid principal balance associated with first lien forward mortgages within our third-party servicing portfolio increased $32.9 billion at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 . This increase was primarily due to bulk servicing right acquisitions and our originations and related loan sales activities. The decrease in the second lien forward mortgages, manufactured housing and other loans within our third-party servicing portfolio of $683.9 million at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 was primarily due to run-off of the portfolio. The decrease in the unpaid principal balance of our on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages of $442.3 million at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 can be attributed to a decline in forward loans held for sale and the portfolio run-off of the assets held by the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts. At March 31, 2014 , we had $599.8 million in unpaid principal balance associated with loans held for sale as compared to $976.8 million at December 31, 2013 .
The weighted-average servicing fee of our third-party servicing portfolio at March 31, 2014 increased by one basis point as compared to the weighted-average servicing fee at December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of higher fees on recent portfolios added to first lien mortgages and runoff of first lien portfolios with lower fees. At March 31, 2014 , the servicing portfolio included more first lien mortgages with higher average fees. First lien mortgages had a weighted-average fee of 25 basis points at March 31, 2014 as compared to 23 basis points at December 31, 2013.
The decrease of 1.6% in delinquencies associated with the first lien forward mortgages within our third-party servicing portfolio at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 was primarily due to current year servicing right acquisitions, which included better performing, and thus less delinquent loans, and newly originated mortgages and thus resulted in lower on-average delinquencies than those of the portfolio at December 31, 2013 . The delinquencies associated with the second lien forward mortgages and manufactured housing within our third-party servicing portfolio decreased 0.7% and 0.6% at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 , respectively, primarily due to seasonality. In addition to seasonality, delinquencies associated with the other loans category decreased by 9.2% due to increased collections for loans that transferred to our servicing portfolio during the three months ended December 2013. These types of loans tend to have lower delinquencies during the first quarter of the year. Delinquencies for our on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages remained relatively flat at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 .

72



Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
A summary of net servicing revenue and fees for our Servicing segment is provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing fees
 
$
167,381

 
$
121,856

 
$
45,525

Incentive and performance fees
 
29,847

 
20,375

 
9,472

Ancillary and other fees
 
21,599

 
14,377

 
7,222

Servicing revenue and fees
 
218,827

 
156,608

 
62,219

Changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions (1)
 
(25,618
)
 
(3,980
)
 
(21,638
)
Other changes in fair value (2)
 
(22,016
)
 
(17,095
)
 
(4,921
)
Change in fair value of servicing rights
 
(47,634
)
 
(21,075
)
 
(26,559
)
Amortization of servicing rights
 
(10,367
)
 
(10,406
)
 
39

Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
160,826

 
$
125,127

 
$
35,699

_______
(1)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(2)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value due to the realization of expected cash flows over time.
Servicing fees increased $45.5 million or 37% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to growth in the third-party servicing portfolio resulting mainly from bulk MSR portfolio acquisitions and servicing rights capitalized as a result of our loan origination activities and a $13.1 million benefit related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract, partially offset by normal run-off of the servicing portfolio. Average loans serviced increased by $42.3 billion or 26% during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 . Incentive and performance fees increased by $ 9.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of higher fees earned under HAMP of $7.4 million while ancillary and other fees increased by $ 7.2 million largely due to higher late fees resulting from growth in the servicing portfolio. The net fair value losses on servicing rights carried at fair value of $47.6 million and $21.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, relate to the risk-managed forward loan class discussed below.
Provided below is a summary of the average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced and the related average servicing fee for our Servicing segment (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced (1)
 
$
204,104,021

 
$
161,848,417

 
$
42,255,604

Annualized average servicing fee  (2) (3)
 
0.33
%
 
0.30
%
 
0.03
%
_______  
(1)
Average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced is calculated as the average of the monthly average unpaid principal balances.
(2)
Average servicing fee is calculated by dividing gross servicing fees by the average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced.
(3)
Annualized.
The increase in average servicing fee of three basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was primarily due to a $13.1 million benefit related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract which did not exist in the prior year period.


73



Servicing Rights Carried at Fair Value
A summary of key economic inputs and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value is presented below (dollars in thousands):
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Servicing rights at fair value
 
$
1,513,830

 
$
1,131,124

Unpaid principal balance of accounts serviced
 
164,433,072

 
130,123,288

Inputs and assumptions:
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
6.6

 
6.8

Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
5.00
%
 
5.20
%
Weighted-average discount rate
 
9.59
%
 
9.76
%
Conditional prepayment rate
 
7.54
%
 
7.06
%
Conditional default rate
 
2.68
%
 
2.90
%
At March 31, 2014 , almost all servicing rights carried at fair value related to acquisitions completed since January 1, 2013, including bulk and flow MSR portfolio acquisitions and servicing rights capitalized as a result of our loan origination activities. The decrease in fair value of these servicing rights at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 is attributed to $ 25.6 million in changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions and $ 22.0 million in other changes in fair value which reflect the impact on servicing rights for the realization of expected cash flows resulting from both regularly scheduled and unscheduled payments and payoffs of principal of loans.
The changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions of $ 25.6 million was due primarily to a higher assumed conditional prepayment rate which resulted primarily from a lower interest rate environment and an increase in the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s, or FHFA’s, housing price index, partially offset by reductions in prepayment speeds on expected HARP activity since December 31, 2013. The decline in the assumed conditional default rate and discount rate from December 31, 2013 was driven by new portfolio acquisitions that have lower risk profiles, and accordingly, lower assumed conditional default rates and discount rates.
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses increased $16.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to growth in the business.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense increased $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to hiring to support the growth of our business including employees added in conjunction with the acquisition of certain assets of MetLife Bank, N.A., in March 2013. Headcount assigned to our Servicing segment increased by approximately 600 full-time employees from 2,600 at March 31, 2013 to 3,200 at March 31, 2014 .
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased by $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to the increase in servicing advance liabilities to support our funding of servicer and protective advances that have grown by $1.0 billion at March 31, 2014 as compared to March 31, 2013 , primarily as a result of bulk servicing right acquisitions.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense includes amortization of certain intangible assets related to the servicing business including customer and institutional relationship intangibles and capitalized software development costs. Depreciation and amortization remained relatively flat during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 .
Core Earnings
Core Earnings increased by $32.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from the increase in revenues, net of expenses due to the growth of the servicing portfolio, including a higher unfavorable change in fair value of servicing rights of $ 26.6 million and a $13.1 million benefit included in net servicing revenue and fees related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract.

74



Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $48.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , resulting primarily from growth in the business, a $13.1 million benefit related to the settlement of amounts associated with a servicing contract and $9.8 million in servicing fee economics related to MSRs associated with EverBank and those acquired from an affiliate of a large national bank.
Originations
Our Originations segment consists of operations that originate and purchase forward loans that are sold to third parties with servicing rights generally retained.
Provided below is a summary of results of operations for our Originations segment, which also includes Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net gains on sales of loans
 
$
104,034

 
$
74,062

 
$
29,972

Other revenues
 
5,180

 
1,997

 
3,183

Total revenues
 
109,214

 
76,059

 
33,155

Salaries and benefits
 
43,236

 
24,588

 
18,648

General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
33,940

 
14,829

 
19,111

Interest expense
 
6,833

 
706

 
6,127

Depreciation and amortization
 
4,995

 
1,677

 
3,318

Total expenses
 
89,004

 
41,800

 
47,204

Income before income taxes
 
20,210

 
34,259

 
(14,049
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
2,853

 
1,277

 
1,576

Share-based compensation expense
 
829

 
268

 
561

Other
 
2,978

 

 
2,978

Total adjustments
 
6,660

 
1,545

 
5,115

Core Earnings
 
26,870

 
35,804

 
(8,934
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
2,142

 
400

 
1,742

Other
 
1,093

 
41

 
1,052

Total adjustments
 
3,235

 
441

 
2,794

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
30,105

 
$
36,245

 
$
(6,140
)

75



The volume of our originations activity and changes in market rates primarily govern the fluctuations in revenues and expenses of our Originations segment. Locked applications were $2.0 billion at March 31, 2014. Provided below is a summary of our locked volume, adjusted for anticipated loan funding probability, funded volume and sold volume (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
Locked
Originations
Volume  (1)
 
Funded
Originations
Volume
 
Sold
Originations
Volume
 
Locked
Originations
Volume  (1)
 
Funded
Originations
Volume
 
Sold
Originations
Volume
Retention
$
1,839,796

 
$
1,753,569

 
$
1,955,630

 
$
1,492,747

 
$
319,417

 
$
114,038

Correspondent
1,497,189

 
1,467,150

 
1,571,523

 
168,100

 
11,223

 

Wholesale
194,402

 
258,091

 
321,518

 
87,416

 
4,844

 

Retail
32,906

 
36,490

 
47,445

 
125,850

 
40,284

 
5,516

Total
$
3,564,293

 
$
3,515,300

 
$
3,896,116

 
$
1,874,113

 
$
375,768

 
$
119,554

_______  
(1)
Volume has been adjusted by the percentage of mortgage loans not expected to close based on previous historical experience and change in interest rates.
Net Gains on Sales of Loans
The amount of net gain on sales of loans is a function of the volume of our originations activity and the fair value of these loans. Net gain on sales of loans is increased or decreased by any mark to market pricing adjustments on freestanding derivatives outstanding during the period and changes to the provision for repurchases related to loans sold during the period. The volatility in the gain on sale spread is attributable to market pricing, which changes with demand and the general level of interest rates. While many factors can affect consumer demand for mortgages, generally, pricing competition on mortgage loans is lower in periods of low or declining interest rates, as consumer demand is greater. This provides opportunities for originators to increase volume and earn wider margins. Conversely, pricing competition increases when interest rates rise as consumer demand lessens. This reduces overall origination volume and may lead originators to reduce margins. The level and direction of interest rates however are not the sole determinant of consumer demand for mortgages and other factors such as secondary market conditions, home prices, credit spreads or legislative activity may impact consumer demand more significantly than interest rates in any given period.
Net gains on sales of loans for our Originations segment consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Realized gains on sales of loans
 
$
86,833

 
$
4,197

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on loans held for sale
 
(4,176
)
 
13,626

Net fair value gains (losses) on freestanding derivatives (1)
 
(37,395
)
 
54,684

Capitalized servicing rights
 
52,613

 
1,290

Provision for repurchases
 
(2,186
)
 
(160
)
Interest income
 
8,345

 
425

Net gains on sales of loans
 
$
104,034

 
$
74,062

_______  
(1)
Realized gains (losses) on hedging activities were $(20.3) million and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The increase in realized gains on sales of loans of $82.6 million and the provision for repurchases of $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was primarily due to higher volume as our originations activity ramped-up during February of 2013, subsequent to the acquisition of the ResCap originations platform on January 31, 2013. Similarly, capitalized servicing rights increased during 2014 given this growth. We recorded a decline in fair value of loans held for sale and freestanding derivatives during the three months ended March 31, 2014 due primarily to a decline in the unpaid principal balance of loans held for sale of $377.0 million and lower locked pipeline of $238.2 million which was offset with lower interest rates and higher pricing on Fannie Mae securities at March 31, 2014, as compared to December 31, 2013.

76



Other Revenues
Other revenues, which consists primarily of origination fee income and interest on cash equivalents, increased $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 as a result of growth in the business.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense increased $18.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to approximately 200 additional full-time employees coupled with the growth in our originations business.
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses increased $19.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 as a result of growth in the business.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the Originations segment consists of interest incurred on master repurchase agreements, which are used to finance the origination and purchase of forward loans. Interest expense increased by $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to growth in the originations business.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense consists primarily of depreciation of computer software and amortization of intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of the ResCap originations and capital markets platforms. Depreciation and amortization increased $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of increased technology development as we deployed new assets in this business.
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $8.9 million and $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013, respectively, due primarily to higher expenses resulting from a higher volume of loans funded in relation to locked volume. In the prior year period the business substantially ramped up operations with the acquisition of the capital markets and originations platforms from ResCap on January 31, 2013 and correspondent lending and wholesale broker businesses from Ally Bank on March 1, 2013, therefore locked volume was significantly larger than funded volume. As a result, in the prior year period we had higher revenues in relation to expenses. In the current quarter, the relationship of locked volume to funded volume normalized. In addition, both locked and funded volumes were higher during the current year period as a result of having the activity of three months of ResCap consumer lending originations business in 2014 as compared to two months in 2013 and three months of Ally Bank correspondent lending and wholesale broker originations business in 2014 as compared to one month in 2013.


77



Reverse Mortgage
Our Reverse Mortgage segment consists of operations that purchase and originate reverse loans that are securitized but remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for secured borrowings, or HMBS related obligations. This segment also performs servicing for third-party investors in reverse loans and provides other ancillary services for the reverse mortgage market.
Provided below is a summary of results of operations for our Reverse Mortgage segment, which also includes Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
$
17,236

 
$
36,788

 
$
(19,552
)
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
7,610

 
6,748

 
862

Net gain on sales of loans
 

 
4,383

 
(4,383
)
Other revenues
 
3,022

 
2,945

 
77

Total revenues
 
27,868

 
50,864

 
(22,996
)
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
17,171

 
15,198

 
1,973

Salaries and benefits
 
17,033

 
17,325

 
(292
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
2,449

 
2,723

 
(274
)
Other expenses, net
 
156

 

 
156

Interest expense
 
859

 
3,529

 
(2,670
)
Total expenses
 
37,668

 
38,775

 
(1,107
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
(9,800
)
 
12,089

 
(21,889
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 
4,661

 
3,536

 
1,125

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
1,893

 
2,451

 
(558
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
490

 
287

 
203

Other
 
(52
)
 

 
(52
)
Total adjustments
 
6,992

 
6,274

 
718

Core Earnings
 
(2,808
)
 
18,363

 
(21,171
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of servicing rights
 
750

 
918

 
(168
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
556

 
272

 
284

Non-cash interest income
 
(65
)
 
(151
)
 
86

Interest expense on debt
 
10

 
17

 
(7
)
Other
 
68

 
37

 
31

Total adjustments
 
1,319

 
1,093

 
226

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
(1,489
)
 
$
19,456

 
$
(20,945
)

78



Reverse Mortgage Servicing Portfolio
Provided below are summaries of the activity in our third-party servicing portfolio for our reverse mortgage business, which includes accounts serviced for third parties for which we earn servicing revenue and, thus, excludes servicing performed related to residential loans and real estate owned that have been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets, as the reverse loan transfer was accounted for as a secured borrowing (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Not Capitalized
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our reverse loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
44,663

 
$
2,777,252

 
$
2,940,256

 
$
1,972,796

 
$
7,690,304

New business added
 
1,873

 

 

 
195,365

 
195,365

Other additions (1)
 

 
28,375

 
48,764

 
38,406

 
115,545

Payoffs, sales and curtailments
 
(825
)
 
(60,625
)
 
(44,495
)
 
(51,475
)
 
(156,595
)
Ending balance
 
45,711

 
$
2,745,002

 
$
2,944,525

 
$
2,155,092

 
$
7,844,619

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At March 31, 2014
Ending number of accounts associated with our reverse loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
17,449

 
17,561

 
10,701

 
45,711

 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Not Capitalized
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our reverse loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
42,855

 
$
3,032,569

 
$
3,023,614

 
$
1,398,123

 
$
7,454,306

New business added
 
113

 
4,770

 

 
15,896

 
20,666

Other additions (1)
 

 
31,742

 
52,862

 
22,570

 
107,174

Payoffs, sales and curtailments
 
(899
)
 
(79,265
)
 
(83,627
)
 
(39,329
)
 
(202,221
)
Ending balance
 
42,069

 
$
2,989,816

 
$
2,992,849

 
$
1,397,260

 
$
7,379,925

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At March 31, 2013
Ending number of accounts associated with our reverse loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
19,528

 
18,606

 
3,935

 
42,069

_________
(1)
Other additions associated with servicing and sub-servicing rights capitalized include additions to the principal balance serviced related to interest, servicing fees, mortgage insurance and advances owed by the borrower.
Provided below is a summary of the number of accounts, unpaid principal balance and weighted average contractual servicing fee rate related to our servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages (dollars in thousands):
 
 
At March 31, 2014
 
 
Number of
Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual
Servicing Fee
Third-party servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
45,711

 
$
7,844,619

 
0.15
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with reverse mortgages
 
54,430

 
8,471,174

 
 
Total servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
100,141

 
$
16,315,793

 
 

79



 
 
At December 31, 2013
 
 
Number of
Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual
Servicing Fee
Third-party servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
44,663

 
$
7,690,304

 
0.16
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with reverse mortgages
 
52,196

 
8,167,516

 
 
Total servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
96,859

 
$
15,857,820

 
 
Net Fair Value Gains on Reverse Loans and Related HMBS Obligations
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Net fair value gains (losses) on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
 
 
 
Interest income on reverse loans
 
$
96,881

 
$
77,267

Change in fair value of reverse loans
 
108,528

 
1,538

Net fair value gains on reverse loans
 
205,409

 
78,805

Interest expense on HMBS related obligations
 
(90,560
)
 
(69,675
)
Change in fair value of HMBS related obligations
 
(97,613
)
 
27,658

Net fair value losses on HMBS related obligations
 
(188,173
)
 
(42,017
)
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
$
17,236

 
$
36,788


Net contractual interest declined by $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to a decline in unsecuritized HECMs. The changes in fair value recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 related to the reverse loans and HMBS related obligations were due to growth of the portfolio as well as the change in market pricing for newly originated HECMs and HMBS. The decline in the change in fair value of $18.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was due primarily to a 75% decline in new origination volume reducing gains on aggregated loan pool pricing by $23.5 million, partially offset by higher gains of $2.8 million associated with draws on reverse loans and resulting fair value adjustments.

Net Servicing Revenue and Fees

Net servicing revenue and fees for the reverse mortgage business consists of contractual servicing fees and ancillary and other fees related to our third-party reverse mortgage portfolio offset by amortization of servicing rights. The growth in net servicing revenue and fees during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 of $ 0.9 million was due primarily to the growth in the servicing portfolio. A summary of net servicing revenue and fees for our Reverse Mortgage segment is provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing fees
 
$
3,217

 
$
2,865

 
$
352

Incentive and performance fees
 
4,106

 
3,400

 
706

Ancillary and other fees
 
1,037

 
1,401

 
(364
)
Servicing revenue and fees
 
8,360

 
7,666

 
694

Amortization of servicing rights
 
(750
)
 
(918
)
 
168

Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
7,610

 
$
6,748

 
$
862


80



Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Beginning in May 2013, we no longer sell reverse loans to third parties and all reverse loans purchased and originated are securitized by RMS and as such remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for HMBS related obligations. No gain or loss is recognized upon securitization of reverse loans. As a result, there were no gains on sales of loans recognized by our Reverse Mortgage segment subsequent to April 30, 2013.
Net gains on sales of loans relate to sales of loans to third parties and consist of the following (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2013
Realized gains on sale of loans
$
4,111

Interest income
363

Provision for repurchases
(11
)
Other
(80
)
Net gains on sales of loans
$
4,383

Other Revenues
Other revenues, which primarily consist of origination fee income, remained relatively flat during each of the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 .
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses increased $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to a higher provision for uncollectible advances resulting from the aging of the advances.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense remained relatively flat for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 .
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense for the reverse mortgage business, including step-up depreciation and amortization, relates to premises and equipment and intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisitions of RMS and S1L. Depreciation and amortization remained relatively flat for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 .
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to lower average borrowings on master repurchase agreements resulting from a lower amount of unsecuritized HECMs and lower cost of debt.
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $21.2 million and $20.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to the decline in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations.

81



Assets Receivables Management
Our ARM segment performs collections of post charge-off deficiency balances on behalf of securitization trusts and third-party asset owners.
Provided below is a summary of results of operations for our ARM segment, which also includes Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
Third parties
 
$
8,921

 
$
9,983

 
$
(1,062
)
Intercompany
 
125

 
107

 
18

Total net servicing revenue and fees
 
9,046

 
10,090

 
(1,044
)
Other revenues
 

 
64

 
(64
)
Total revenues
 
9,046

 
10,154

 
(1,108
)
 
 
 
 
 
 


General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
2,763

 
2,990

 
(227
)
Salaries and benefits
 
2,482

 
3,040

 
(558
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
1,302

 
1,756

 
(454
)
Total expenses
 
6,547

 
7,786

 
(1,239
)
Income before income taxes
 
2,499

 
2,368

 
131

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
1,094

 
1,473

 
(379
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
63

 
138

 
(75
)
Transaction and integration costs
 
36

 

 
36

Total adjustments
 
1,193

 
1,611

 
(418
)
Core Earnings
 
3,692

 
3,979

 
(287
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
208

 
283

 
(75
)
Other
 
7

 
8

 
(1
)
Total adjustments
 
215

 
291

 
(76
)
Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
3,907

 
$
4,270

 
$
(363
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross collections
 
$
30,672

 
$
34,014

 
$
(3,342
)
Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
Net servicing revenue and fees consist of asset recovery revenue. Net servicing revenue and fees decreased $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of the decline in gross collections.
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses decreased $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of a decline in indirect expenses.

82



Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits decreased $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of a lower number of full-time employees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense consists primarily of amortization of the customer-relationship intangible asset recognized for our ARM business in connection with the acquisition of Green Tree. Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of the decline in the customer-relationship intangible asset which is amortized under the economic consumption method.
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA remained relatively flat for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 .
Insurance
Our Insurance segment consists of our agency business. The agency business recognizes commission income, net of estimated future policy cancellations, at the time policies are effective.
Provided below is a summary of results of operations for our Insurance segment, which also includes Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Insurance revenue
 
$
23,388

 
$
17,534

 
$
5,854

Other revenues
 
4

 
7

 
(3
)
Total revenues
 
23,392

 
17,541

 
5,851

General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
6,296

 
7,327

 
(1,031
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
1,183

 
1,314

 
(131
)
Salaries and benefits
 
818

 
843

 
(25
)
Other expenses, net
 
428

 
338

 
90

Total expenses
 
8,725

 
9,822

 
(1,097
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
14,667

 
7,719

 
6,948

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
1,183

 
1,464

 
(281
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
304

 
339

 
(35
)
Non-cash interest expense
 

 
19

 
(19
)
Total adjustments
 
1,487

 
1,822

 
(335
)
Core Earnings
 
16,154

 
9,541

 
6,613

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
(150
)
 
150

Non-cash interest income
 

 
(7
)
 
7

Other
 
21

 
18

 
3

Total adjustments
 
21

 
(139
)
 
160

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
16,175

 
$
9,402

 
$
6,773


83



Provided below is a summary of net written premiums (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net written premiums
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lender-placed
 
$
52,959

 
$
29,475

 
$
23,484

Voluntary
 
17,987

 
17,840

 
147

Total net written premiums
 
$
70,946

 
$
47,315

 
$
23,631

Provided below is a summary of outstanding insurance policies written:
 
 
March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Number of outstanding policies written
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lender-placed
 
147,676

 
110,748

 
36,928

Voluntary
 
72,833

 
82,173

 
(9,340
)
Total outstanding policies written
 
220,509

 
192,921

 
27,588

The increase in net written premiums associated with lender-placed insurance policies during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was primarily due to new business resulting from 2013 bulk servicing right acquisitions.
Insurance Revenue
Commission income is based on a percentage of the price of the insurance policy sold, which varies based on the type of product. Insurance revenue increased $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to the increase in lender-placed insurance policies issued in relation to the 2013 bulk servicing right acquisitions, partially offset by run-off of policies previously in-force.
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses decreased $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 as a result of a decline in indirect expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization consists primarily of amortization of the customer-relationship intangible assets recognized for our Insurance business in connection with the acquisition of Green Tree. Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 as a result of the decline in the customer-relationship intangible asset, which is amortized under the economic consumption method.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits remained relatively flat for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 .
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA
Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA increased by $6.6 million and $6.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to the increase in insurance revenues.

84



Loans and Residuals
Our Loans and Residuals segment consists of the forward mortgage loans, real estate owned and mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts, as well as unencumbered residential loans and real estate owned. Through this business, we seek to earn a spread from the interest income we earn on the residential loans less the credit losses we incur on these loans and the interest expense we pay on the mortgage-backed debt issued to finance the loans.
Provided below is a summary statement of operations for our Loans and Residuals segment, which also includes Core Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Interest income
 
$
34,422

 
$
36,898

 
$
(2,476
)
Interest expense
 
(20,303
)
 
(22,296
)
 
1,993

Net interest income
 
14,119

 
14,602

 
(483
)
Provision for loan losses
 
1,004

 
(1,726
)
 
2,730

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
 
15,123

 
12,876

 
2,247

Other revenues
 
2

 
3

 
(1
)
Other losses
 
(242
)
 
(162
)
 
(80
)
Intercompany expense
 
(2,646
)
 
(2,832
)
 
186

Other expenses, net
 
(1,982
)
 
(1,272
)
 
(710
)
Total other revenue (expense)
 
(4,868
)
 
(4,263
)
 
(605
)
Income before income taxes
 
10,255

 
8,613

 
1,642

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-cash interest expense
 
819

 
677

 
142

Total adjustments
 
819

 
677

 
142

Core Earnings
 
11,074

 
9,290

 
1,784

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-cash interest income
 
(3,626
)
 
(3,949
)
 
323

Residual Trusts cash flows
 
1,570

 
400

 
1,170

Provision for loan losses
 
(1,004
)
 
1,726

 
(2,730
)
Other
 
(1,166
)
 
(1,692
)
 
526

Total adjustments
 
(4,226
)
 
(3,515
)
 
(711
)
Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
6,848

 
$
5,775

 
$
1,073

Provided below is a summary of the carrying value of the residential loans, mortgage-backed debt and real estate owned of the Loans and Residuals segment (in thousands):
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
Variance
Residential loans, net
 
$
1,377,665

 
$
1,394,021

 
$
(16,356
)
Mortgage-backed debt, net of discounts
 
1,177,001

 
1,203,084

 
(26,083
)
Real estate owned, net
 
38,763

 
45,306

 
(6,543
)
 

85



Net Interest Income
Net interest income decreased $0.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to the decline in residential loans at amortized cost.
Provision for Loan Losses
We recognize a provision for loan losses for our residential loan portfolio accounted for at amortized cost. The provision for loan losses decreased by $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to lower loss severities, which improved throughout 2013 and continued into 2014 as a result of higher average home selling prices in our markets, and a decrease in the default frequency rate used to calculate the allowance for loan losses based on favorable delinquency trends.
Intercompany Expense
Our Loans and Residuals segment is charged a fee by our Servicing segment for performing servicing activities for the residential loans and real estate owned of the Loans and Residuals segment. Intercompany expenses decreased $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due to a decline in residential loan balances serviced.
Other Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net consists primarily of loan portfolio expenses and real estate owned expenses, net, which include lower of cost or fair value adjustments. The increase in other expenses of $ 0.7 million is primarily due to lower gains on sales of real estate owned of $0.5 million.
Core Earnings
Core Earnings increased by $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to the improved provision for loan losses.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to additional cash flows released to us for overcollaterization requirements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay debt and meet the financial obligations of our operations including funding acquisitions; forward and reverse loan servicing advances; obligations associated with the repurchase of reverse loans from securitization pools; funding additional borrowing capacity on reverse loans; origination of mortgage loans; and other general business needs. Our liquidity is measured as our and our subsidiaries’ cash and cash equivalents excluding subsidiary minimum cash requirement balances, which are typically associated with our servicing or financing agreements with third parties. This measure also includes our borrowing capacity available under the 2013 Revolver, as described under the Corporate Debt section below. At March 31, 2014 , our liquidity was $628.9 million. At March 31, 2014, we had earmarked approximately $290.0 million of our liquidity to fund previously announced acquisitions of MSRs, including related servicer and protective advances, and platform acquisitions as well as $20.0 million for our capital contribution to WCO.

Our policy is to maintain our liquidity at a level sufficient to fund certain known or expected payments and to fund our working capital needs. Our principal sources of liquidity are the cash flows generated from our Servicing and Originations segments and funds available from our 2013 Revolver, master repurchase agreements, forward loan servicing advance facilities, issuance of HMBS and future sales of excess servicing spread.
We believe that, based on current forecasts and anticipated market conditions, our current liquidity, along with the funds generated from our principal sources of liquidity discussed above, will allow for financial flexibility to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund operating needs and expenses, servicing advances, loan originations, planned capital expenditures, current committed business and asset acquisitions, and all required debt service obligations for the next 12 months. We expect to generate adequate cash flows to fund our operations principally from our servicing and origination operations and expect to fund future growth opportunities with capital obtained from external sources. Our operating cash flows and liquidity are significantly influenced by numerous factors, including interest rates and continued availability of financing, including the renewal of existing forward loan servicing advance facilities and forward and reverse loan master repurchase agreements. We may access the capital markets from time to time to

86



augment our liquidity position as our business dictates, which includes our ability to offer and sell securities under our shelf registration statement described below. We continually monitor our cash flows and liquidity in order to be responsive to these changing conditions.
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC for an indeterminate number of securities that is effective for three years (expires February 6, 2015), after which time we expect to be able to file another shelf registration statement that would be in place for another three year term. Under this universal shelf registration statement, we have the capacity to offer and sell from time to time securities, including common stock, debt securities, preferred stock, warrants and units.
Forward Mortgage Servicing Business
Our servicing agreements impose on us various rights and obligations that affect our liquidity. Among the most significant of these obligations is the requirement that we advance our own funds to meet contractual payment requirements for investors and to pay taxes, insurance and foreclosure costs and various other items, referred to as protective advances, which are required to preserve the collateral underlying the residential loans being serviced. In the normal course of business, we borrow money from various counterparties who provide us with financing to fund a portion of our forward loan related servicing advances on a short-term basis or provide for reimbursement within an agreed-upon period. Our ability to fund servicing advances is a significant factor that affects our liquidity and we depend upon our ability to secure these types of arrangements on acceptable terms and to renew or replace existing financing facilities as they expire. However there can be no assurance that these facilities will be available to us in the future. The servicing advance financing agreements that support our servicing operations are discussed below.
Servicing Advance Facilities
Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement
In April 2014, we renewed our Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae, which provides for the reimbursement of up to $950.0 million of certain principal and interest and protective advances that are our responsibility under certain servicing agreements. The cost of this agreement is LIBOR plus 2.50% or 3.50% on amounts being reimbursed. The agreement expires on March 31, 2015. Collections of advances that have been reimbursed under the agreement require remittance upon collection to settle the outstanding balance under the agreement. We had $889.8 million outstanding under this agreement at March 31, 2014 .
Fannie Mae is required to provide us with notification, if they will not renew the Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement, 120 days prior to the expiration of the agreement. If not renewed, there will be no additional funding of new advances under the facility. In addition, collections recovered during the 18 months following the expiration of the agreement are to be remitted to Fannie Mae to settle the outstanding balance at which point the remaining balance will become due and payable.
Indenture Agreement
In January 2014, we entered into an Indenture Agreement that provides borrowings of up to $100 million and is collateralized by certain servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of the Company under certain servicing agreements. The principal and interest payments are required to be paid from the recoveries or repayment of the underlying advances. Accordingly, the timing of principal payments is dependent on the recoveries or repayments received on the underlying advances. The interest rate on the agreement is based on LIBOR plus between 1.25% and 5.50%, depending on the type of underlying advance as defined in the Indenture Agreement. The Indenture Agreement matures in January 2015, at which time if not renewed, we will be required to settle all amounts outstanding. We had $31.5 million outstanding and $34.5 million of collateral pledged under the agreement at March 31, 2014 .
Revolving Credit Agreement
In December 2013, we entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement that provides borrowings of up to $85.0 million and is collateralized by certain servicer and protective advances that are our responsibility under certain servicing agreements. When we collect advances that have been reimbursed under the agreement, we are required to remit at least 80% of such collections to settle the outstanding balance under the agreement. The interest rate under the agreement is LIBOR plus 2.50% through June 30, 2014, and subsequently increases to LIBOR plus 3.75% until maturity in June 2015, at which time if not renewed, we will be required to settle all amounts outstanding. There was $9.0 million outstanding and $11.3 million of collateral pledged under the agreement at March 31, 2014 .

87



Receivables Loan Agreement
In May 2012, we renewed our Receivables Loan Agreement that provides borrowings of up to $75.0 million and is collateralized by certain principal and interest, taxes and insurance and other protective advances reimbursable from securitization trusts serviced by us. The principal payments on the agreement are paid from the recoveries or repayment of underlying advances. Accordingly, the timing of the principal payments is dependent on the recoveries or repayment of underlying advances that collateralize the agreement. The agreement, which matures in July 2015, has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% . There was $66.2 million outstanding and $79.3 million of collateral was pledged under the agreement at March 31, 2014 .
Covenants
With the exception of our Servicer Advance Reimbursement Agreement, our servicing advance financing agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants that are most sensitive to the operating results and resulting financial position are the requirements that we maintain minimum tangible net worth, indebtedness to tangible net worth and minimum liquidity. During the first quarter of 2014, the Receivables Loan Agreement was amended to remove the covenant relating to the requirement to maintain a minimum annual net cash provided by operating activities and to add other customary financial covenants, including indebtedness to tangible net worth and minimum liquidity. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2014 .
Reverse Mortgage Servicing Business
Similar to our forward mortgage servicing business, our servicing agreements impose on us obligations to advance our own funds to meet contractual payment requirements for investors and to pay protective advances, which are required to preserve the collateral underlying the residential loans being serviced. We rely upon operating cash flows to fund these obligations.
Ginnie Mae Buyout Facility
As an HMBS issuer, we assume certain obligations related to each security issued. As discussed below, the most significant obligation is the requirement to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance of the related HECM is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount.
In March 2014, we entered into a revolving line of credit facility for the repurchase of HECM loans. The facility has a committed capacity of $25.0 million. The interest rate on this facility is based on the prime rate plus 0.50%. The maturity date of this facility is February 28, 2015. Borrowings under this facility are secured by the underlying HECMs. We had $21.9 million of borrowings and $27.3 million of collateral pledged under this facility at March 31, 2014. Borrowings at March 31, 2014 are classified as borrowings under master repurchase agreements within debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Forward Mortgage Originations Business
Master Repurchase Agreements
We utilize master repurchase agreements to support our origination or purchase of forward loans. These agreements were entered into by Green Tree Servicing LLC and Ditech Mortgage Corp, or Ditech, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. The facilities had an aggregate capacity of $2.0 billion at March 31, 2014 . At March 31, 2014 , the interest rates on the facilities were primarily based on LIBOR plus between 2.15% and 2.95% and have various expiration dates through March 2015. These facilities provide creditors a security interest in the mortgage loans that meet the eligibility requirements under the terms of the particular facility in exchange for cash proceeds used to originate or purchase forward loans. The source of repayment of these facilities is typically from the sale or securitization of the underlying loans into the secondary mortgage market. We evaluate our needs under these facilities based on forecasted mortgage loan origination volume, however, there can be no assurance that these origination funding facilities will be available to us in the future. The aggregate capacity includes $1.15 billion of committed funds and $850.0 million of uncommitted funds. To the extent uncommitted funds are requested to purchase or originate mortgage loans, the counterparties have no obligation to fulfill such request. All obligations of Green Tree Servicing LLC and Ditech Mortgage Corp under the master repurchase agreements are guaranteed by the Company. We had $573.2 million of borrowings under these master repurchase agreements at March 31, 2014 , which included no borrowings utilizing uncommitted funds.

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company amended its master repurchase agreements relating to its forward mortgage originations
business whereby, among other things, Ditech joined the facilities and was added as a seller to the facilities.

88



All of our master repurchase agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants that are most sensitive to the operating results and resulting financial position are minimum tangible net worth requirements, indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity and profitability requirements. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2014 .
Representations and Warranties
In conjunction with our originations business, we provide representations and warranties on loan sales. We sell and securitize forward loans predominantly to GSEs, such as Fannie Mae. We may also sell forward loans, primarily those that do not meet the criteria for securitizations with GSEs, through whole loan sales to private non-GSE purchasers. In doing so, representations and warranties regarding certain attributes of the loans are made to the GSE or the third-party purchaser. Subsequent to the sale or securitization, if it is determined that the loans sold are in breach of these representations or warranties, we generally have an obligation to either: (1) repurchase the loan for the unpaid principal balance, accrued interest, and related advances, (2) indemnify the purchaser, or (3) make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of the loan.
Our representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits of exposure. However, we believe that the current unpaid principal balance of loans sold by the Company to date represents the maximum exposure to repurchases related to representations and warranties.
Our obligations vary based upon the nature of the repurchase demand and the current status of the residential loan. Our estimate of the liability associated with representations and warranties exposure is recorded in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. A rollforward of this liability is included below (in thousands):


For the Three Months Ended March 31,


2014

2013
Balance at beginning of period

$
9,135


$
395

Provision for new transfers

2,186


171

Provision for change in estimate of existing reserves

(145
)


Net realized losses on repurchases



(127
)
Balance at end of period

$
11,176


$
439


A rollforward of loan repurchase requests is included below (dollars in thousands). Activity during 2013 was insignificant.

 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
No. of Loans
 
Unpaid Principal Balance
Balance at beginning of period
 
10

 
$
2,324

Repurchases and indemnifications
 

 

Claims initiated
 
2

 
280

Rescinded
 
(10
)
 
(2,324
)
Balance at end of period
 
2

 
$
280


In addition to our obligations associated with representations and warranties as transferor of forward loans, as servicer we also have a mandatory obligation to repurchase loans at par from Freddie Mac when the related loans become 90 days past due. The total loans outstanding and subject to being repurchased were $74.7 million at March 31, 2014. The Company has estimated the fair value of this contingent liability at March 31, 2014 as $7.9 million, which is included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

89



Reverse Mortgage Origination Business
Master Repurchase Agreements
Through RMS we finance the origination or purchase of reverse loans through master repurchase agreements. The facilities have an aggregate capacity amount of $295.0 million. The interest rates on the facilities are primarily based on LIBOR plus between 2.50% and 3.50%, in some cases are subject to a LIBOR floor or other minimum rates and have various expiration dates through February 2015. These facilities are secured by the underlying originated or purchased reverse loans and provide creditors a security interest in the reverse loans that meet the eligibility requirements under the terms of the particular facility. The source of repayment of these facilities is from the securitization of the underlying reverse loans and sale of the HMBS through Ginnie Mae as discussed in the section below. We evaluate our needs under these facilities based on forecasted reverse loan origination volume; however, there can be no assurance that these origination funding facilities will be available to us in the future. The aggregate capacity of $295.0 million is uncommitted. To the extent uncommitted funds are requested to purchase or originate reverse loans, the counterparties have no obligation to fulfill such request. All obligations of RMS under the master repurchase agreements are guaranteed by the Company. We had $56.2 million of borrowings under these master repurchase agreements at March 31, 2014 .
All of our master repurchase agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants that are most sensitive to the operating results and resulting financial position are minimum tangible net worth requirements, indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity and profitability requirements.
At March 31, 2014, absent a waiver received from its counterparty, RMS would not have been in compliance with its minimum profitability covenant contained in one of its master repurchase agreements due to RMS’ net loss during the three months ended March 31, 2014. In April 2014, RMS obtained a waiver of compliance effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The waiver of compliance waived all rights and remedies that otherwise would have been available under the master repurchase agreement in the event of non-compliance by RMS. In April 2014, RMS amended another one of its master repurchase agreements to, among other things, change the profitability covenant definition from an event of default to an advance rate trigger, and make certain pricing, interest rate and fee changes. These changes, other than the interest rate and fee changes, were effective for the test period ended on March 31, 2014. Absent this amendment, RMS would not have been in compliance with its minimum profitability covenant for this period. As a result of the waiver and amendment obtained by RMS for the two master repurchase agreements referenced above, all of our subsidiaries were in compliance with our covenants.
Reverse Loan Securitizations
We fund reverse loans through the Ginnie Mae HMBS issuance process. The proceeds from the transfer of the HMBS are accounted for as a secured borrowing under the fair value option and are classified on the consolidated balance sheet as HMBS related obligations. The proceeds from the transfer are used to repay borrowings under our master repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2014 , we had $8.3 billion in unpaid principal balance outstanding on the HMBS related obligations. At March 31, 2014 , $8.3 billion of reverse loans and real estate owned was pledged as collateral to the HMBS beneficial interest holders, and are not available to satisfy the claims of our creditors. Ginnie Mae, as guarantor of the HMBS, is obligated to the holders of the HMBS in an instance of RMS default on its servicing obligations, or when the proceeds realized on HECMs are insufficient to repay all outstanding HMBS related obligations. Ginnie Mae has recourse to RMS to the extent of the collateralized participation interests in the HECMs, but does not have recourse to the general assets of the Company, except for obligations as servicer.
Borrower remittances received on the reverse loans, if any, and proceeds received from the sale of real estate owned and our funds used to repurchase reverse loans are used to reduce the HMBS related obligations by making payments to Ginnie Mae, who will then remit the payments to the holders of the HMBS. The maturity of the HMBS related obligations is directly affected by the liquidation of the reverse loans or liquidation of real estate owned and events of default as stipulated in the reverse loan agreements with borrowers.
HMBS Issuer Obligations
As an HMBS issuer, we assume certain obligations related to each security issued. The most significant obligation is the requirement to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance of the related HECM is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount. Performing repurchased loans are conveyed to the Department of HUD, and nonperforming repurchased loans are generally liquidated through foreclosure and subsequent sale of real estate owned. Loans are considered nonperforming upon events such as, but not limited to, the death of the mortgagor, the mortgagor no longer occupying the property as their principal residence, or the property taxes or insurance not being paid. We rely upon our Ginnie May Buyout Facility and operating cash flows, to the extent necessary, to repurchase loans. The timing and amount of our obligation to repurchase HECMs is indeterminable as repurchase is predicated on certain factors, the most significant of which is whether or not a borrower event of default occurs prior to the HECM reaching the mandatory repurchase threshold under which we are obligated to repurchase the loan.

90



Unfunded Commitments
We, as servicer of reverse loans, are obligated to fund additional borrowing capacity in the form of undrawn lines of credit on floating rate and fixed rate reverse loans. We rely upon our operating cash flows to fund these additional borrowings on a short-term basis prior to securitization (when performing services of the both the issuer and servicer) or reimbursement by the issuer (when providing third-party servicing). The additional borrowings made by us, as issuer and servicer, are generally securitized within 30 days after funding. Similarly, the additional borrowings made by us, as third-party servicer, are typically reimbursed by the issuer within 30 days after funding. Our commitment to fund additional borrowing capacity was $835.7 million at March 31, 2014 . The obligation to fund these additional borrowings could have a significant impact on our liquidity.
Corporate Debt
Term Loans and Revolver
At January 1, 2013, we had a $700 million senior term loan facility, or the 2012 Term Loan, outstanding and a $125 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the 2012 Revolver.
We entered into several amendments to the 2012 Term Loan during 2013. These amendments provided for, among other things, an increase to certain financial ratios that govern our ability to incur additional indebtedness and incremental secured term loans of $1.1 billion in the aggregate.
On December 19, 2013, we refinanced our 2012 Term Loan with a $1.5 billion senior secured first lien term loan, or the 2013 Term Loan, and refinanced our 2012 Revolver with a $125 million secured revolving credit facility, or the 2013 Revolver, collectively, the 2013 Secured Credit Facilities.
Our obligations under the 2013 Secured Credit Facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of our subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of our assets and substantially all assets of the guarantor subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions such as the assets of the consolidated Residual and Non-Residual Trusts and the residential loans and real estate owned of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools that have been recorded in our consolidated balance sheets.
The material terms of our 2013 Secured Credit Facility are summarized in the table below:
Debt Agreement
 
Interest Rate
 
Amortization
 
Maturity/Expiration
$1.5 billion 2013 Term Loan
 
LIBOR plus 3.75%
LIBOR floor of 1.00%

 
1.00% per annum beginning 1st quarter of 2014; remainder at final maturity
 
December 18, 2020
$125 million 2013 Revolver
 
LIBOR plus 3.75%
 
Bullet payment at maturity
 
December 19, 2018
An amount of up to $25.0 million under the 2013 Revolver is available to be used for the issuance of letters of credit, or LOCs. Any amounts outstanding in issued LOCs reduce availability for cash borrowings under the 2013 Revolver. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 , there were no borrowings or repayments under the 2013 Revolver. At March 31, 2014 , we had $0.3 million outstanding in an issued LOC with remaining availability under the 2013 Revolver of $124.7 million. The commitment fee on the unused portion of the 2013 Revolver is 0.50% per year.
The 2013 Secured Credit Facilities contain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase the Company’s capital stock, make certain types of investments, create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to the Company from its restricted subsidiaries, incur certain liens, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and consolidate or merge with or into, or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to, another person. These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. The 2013 Secured Credit Facilities also contain customary events of default, including the failure to make timely payments on the 2013 Term Loan and 2013 Revolver or other material indebtedness, the failure to satisfy certain covenants and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency.
Senior Notes
In December 2013, we completed the sale of $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes, or the Senior Notes, which generated cash proceeds of $561.3 million after debt issuance costs. We used the net proceeds to make deposits on the acquisition of MSRs, to repay $300.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under our then existing 2012 Term Loan, to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The Senior Notes pay interest semi-annually at an interest rate of 7.875% accruing from December 17, 2013 with payments commencing in June 2014. The Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2021. The Senior Notes were offered and sold in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements under the Securities Act, and resold to

91



qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of December 17, 2013, among the Company, the guarantor parties thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of our current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantee our obligations under our 2013 Term Loan.
On or prior to December 15, 2016, we may on any one or more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at 107.875% of their aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption date. Prior to December 15, 2016, we may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at a make-whole premium plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the redemption date.
On or after December 15, 2016, we may on any one or more occasions redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 105.906% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the redemption date, such optional redemption prices decreasing to 103.938% on or after December 15, 2017, 101.969% on or after December 15, 2018 and 100.000% on or after December 15, 2019.
If a change of control occurs, the holders of our Senior Notes may require that we purchase with cash all or a portion of these Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
The Senior Notes Indenture contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase the Company’s capital stock, make certain types of investments, create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to the Company from its restricted subsidiaries, incur certain liens, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and consolidate or merge with or into, or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to, another person. These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. The Senior Notes Indenture also contains customary events of default, including the failure to make timely payments on the Senior Notes or other material indebtedness, the failure to satisfy certain covenants and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency.
On December 17, 2013, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the guarantors and Barclays Capital Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers named therein. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company and the guarantors agreed to use their commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act so as to allow holders of the Senior Notes to exchange their Senior Notes for the same principal amount of a new issue of notes, or the Exchange Notes, with identical terms, except that the Exchange Notes will not be subject to certain restrictions on transfer or to any increase in annual interest rate. If the exchange offer is not completed on or before the date that is 365 days after December 17, 2013, we will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the Senior Notes.
Convertible Notes
In October 2012, we closed on a registered underwritten public offering of $290.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible senior subordinated notes, or the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes pay interest semi-annually on May 1 and November 1, commencing on May 1, 2013, at a rate of 4.50% per year, and mature on November 1, 2019. 
Prior to May 1, 2019, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only upon specified events and during specified periods, and, on or after May 1, 2019, at any time. The Convertible Notes will initially be convertible at a conversion rate of 17.0068 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $58.80 per share. Upon conversion, we may pay or deliver, at our option, cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock.
We generated net proceeds of approximately $280.4 million from the Convertible Notes after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. We used the net proceeds from the Convertible Notes, together with cash on hand, to repay and terminate $265.0 million outstanding under our 2011 Second Lien Term Loan and to pay certain fees, expenses and premiums in connection therewith.
As market conditions warrant, we may from time to time, subject to limitations as stated in our 2013 Credit Facilities, repurchase debt securities issued by us, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.
Residual and Non-Residual Trusts
The cash proceeds from the repayment of the collateral held in the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts are owned by the trusts and serve to only repay the obligations of the trusts unless, for the Residual Trusts, certain overcollateralization or other similar targets are satisfied, in which case, the excess cash is released to us assuming no triggering event has occurred.

92



The Residual Trusts, with the exception of WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1, or Trust 2011-1, contain delinquency and loss triggers, that, if exceeded, allocate any excess cash flows to paying down the outstanding mortgage-backed notes for that particular trust at an accelerated pace. Assuming no servicer triggering events have occurred and the overcollateralization targets have been met, any excess cash from these trusts is released to us. For Trust 2011-1, principal and interest payments are not paid on the subordinate note or residual interests, which are held by us, until all amounts due on the senior notes are fully paid.
Since January 2008 and February 2014, respectively, Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust and Mid-State Trust VII have exceeded certain triggers and have not provided any excess cash flow to us. In addition, from September 2012 to February 2013, Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust, or Trust 2005-1, exceeded the delinquency trigger level of 8.0%. At March 31, 2013, the delinquency rate for Trust 2005-1 was cured and remains cured at March 31, 2014 allowing residual cash flows to now flow to us. Provided below is a table summarizing the actual delinquency and cumulative loss rates in comparison to the trigger rates for our Residual Trusts:
 
 
Delinquency
Trigger
 
Delinquency Rate
 
Cumulative
Loss Trigger
 
Cumulative Loss Rate
 
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Mid-State Trust IV
 
(1)  
 
 
 
10.00%
 
4.38%
 
4.38%
Mid-State Trust VI
 
8.00%
 
2.57%
 
3.15%
 
8.00%
 
5.43%
 
5.36%
Mid-State Trust VII
 
8.50%
 
2.81%
 
2.98%
 
1.50%
 
1.67%
 
1.43%
Mid-State Trust VIII
 
8.50%
 
3.32%
 
3.66%
 
1.50%
 
1.02%
 
1.37%
Mid-State Trust X
 
8.00%
 
3.53%
 
3.70%
 
8.00%
 
7.50%
 
7.60%
Mid-State Trust XI
 
8.75%
 
3.53%
 
3.55%
 
8.75%
 
6.66%
 
6.52%
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2004-1 Trust
 
8.00%
 
4.65%
 
4.67%
 
8.00%
 
3.77%
 
3.67%
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust
 
8.00%
 
6.18%
 
6.66%
 
7.00%
 
4.63%
 
4.46%
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust
 
8.00%
 
8.29%
 
8.85%
 
7.00%
 
8.24%
 
8.02%
Mid-State Capital Trust 2010-1
 
10.50%
 
8.36%
 
8.69%
 
5.50%
 
3.09%
 
2.78%
WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1
 
(1)  
 
 
 
(1)  
 
 
_________
(1)
Relevant trigger is not applicable per the underlying trust agreements.
Mortgage-Backed Debt
We funded the residential loan portfolio in the consolidated Residual Trusts through the securitization market. We record on our consolidated balance sheets the assets and liabilities, including mortgage-backed debt, of the Non-Residual Trusts as a result of certain obligations to exercise mandatory clean-up calls for each of these trusts at their earliest exercisable dates. The mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts is accounted for at amortized cost. The mortgage-backed debt of the Non-Residual Trusts is accounted for at fair value. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , the total unpaid principal balance of mortgage-backed debt was $1.9 billion.
At March 31, 2014, mortgage-backed debt was collateralized by $2.3 billion of assets including residential loans, receivables related to the Non-Residual Trusts, real estate owned and restricted cash and cash equivalents. All of the mortgage-backed debt is non-recourse and not cross-collateralized and, therefore, must be satisfied exclusively with the proceeds from the residential loans and real estate owned held in each securitization trust and also from draws on the LOCs of certain Non-Residual Trusts.
Borrower remittances received on the residential loans of the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts collateralizing this debt and draws under LOCs issued by a third-party and serving as credit enhancements to certain of the Non-Residual Trusts are used to make payments on the mortgage-backed debt. The maturity of the mortgage-backed debt is directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on the collateral. As a result, the actual maturity of the mortgage-backed debt is likely to occur earlier than the stated maturity. Certain of our mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts is also subject to voluntary redemption according to the specific terms of the respective indenture agreements, including an option by us to exercise a clean-up call. The mortgage-backed debt issued by the Non-Residual Trusts is subject to mandatory clean-up call provisions at the earliest of their exercisable call dates, which is the date each loan pool falls to 10% of the original principal amount. We anticipate the mandatory call obligations to settle beginning in 2017 and continue through 2019 based upon our current cash flow projections for the Non-Residual Trusts. The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the respective call dates is $417.4 million. We expect to finance the capital required to exercise the mandatory clean-up call primarily through asset-backed financing alone or in combination with

93



additional issuances of equity and/or corporate indebtedness; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing through the capital markets when needed. Our obligation for the mandatory clean-up call could have a significant impact on our liquidity.
Regulatory Compliance
We, including our subsidiaries, are required to maintain regulatory compliance with GSE and other agency and state program requirements, some of which are financial covenants related to minimum levels of net worth and other financial requirements. To the extent that these mandatory, imposed capital requirements are not met, the Company’s selling and servicing agreements could be terminated.
Due to the accounting treatment for reverse loans as secured borrowings when transferred, RMS has obtained an indefinite waiver for certain of these requirements from Ginnie Mae and through June 2014 from Fannie Mae. In addition, we have provided a guarantee beginning on the date of acquisition, of RMS whereby we guarantee its performance and obligations under the Ginnie Mae HMBS Program. In the event that we fail to honor this guarantee, Ginnie Mae could terminate RMS’ status as a qualified issuer of HMBS as well as take other actions permitted by law that could impact the operations of RMS, including the termination or suspension of RMS’ servicing rights associated with reverse loans guaranteed by Ginnie Mae HMBS. Ginnie Mae has continued to affirm RMS’ current commitment authority to issue HMBS. In addition we have provided a guarantee dated May 31, 2013 whereby we guarantee RMS’ performance obligations with Fannie Mae under a mortgage selling and servicing contract between RMS and Fannie Mae. RMS does not currently sell Fannie Mae loans. However, in the event that we fail to honor this guarantee, Fannie Mae could disallow the servicing of its loans and participation interests by RMS.
Noncompliance with those requirements for which the Company has not received a waiver could have a negative impact on our company which could include suspension or termination of the selling and servicing agreements which would prohibit future origination or securitization of mortgage loans or being an approved seller or servicer for the applicable GSE.
Dividends
We have no current plans to pay any cash dividends on our common stock and instead may retain earnings, if any, for future operation and expansion or debt repayment, among other things. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants in our 2013 Credit Agreement and the Senior Notes Indenture. See “Corporate Debt” above.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table sets forth selected consolidated cash flow information for the periods indicated (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income adjusted for non-cash operating activities
 
$
5,663

 
$
(35,131
)
 
$
40,794

Changes in assets and liabilities
 
(53,950
)
 
30,850

 
(84,800
)
Net cash provided by (used in) originations activities (1)
 
455,839

 
(205,316
)
 
661,155

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
 
$
407,552

 
$
(209,597
)
 
$
617,149

Cash flows used in investing activities
 
(202,307
)
 
(1,748,443
)
 
1,546,136

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
 
(134,426
)
 
2,140,711

 
(2,275,137
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
$
70,819

 
$
182,671

 
$
(111,852
)
_________
(1)
Represents purchases and originations of residential loans held for sale, net of proceeds from sale and payments.

94



Operating Activities
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of $407.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $617.1 million from $(209.6) million in 2013. The primary sources of cash for operating activities in 2014 were purchases, originations and sales activity of residential loans held for sale, changes in assets and liabilities, or operating working capital, and net income adjusted for non-cash items. Net cash of $455.8 million was provided by purchases, originations and sales activity of residential loans held for sale related to the forward loans originations business. We used $54.0 million in operating working capital largely as a result of a decrease in payables and accrued liabilities during the first quarter of 2014.
Net cash used in operating activities was $209.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The primary uses of cash from operating activities were purchases, originations and sales activity of residential loans held for sale and net income adjusted for non-cash items. The net cash used in operating activities in 2013 was primarily due to the ramp up of our originations activities which resulted in $433.0 million used in originations and acquisitions of residential loans offset by $227.7 million in proceeds from sales of residential loans.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $202.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $1.5 billion from $1.7 billion in 2013. Our Reverse Mortgage segment purchases, originates, and securitizes reverse mortgage loans. We fund these activities through master repurchase agreements, which are presented as financing activities as required by GAAP. The securitizations of reverse mortgages are legally structured as sales, but for accounting purposes are treated as financings under the applicable accounting guidance. As a result, the HMBS related obligation is also presented as a financing activity as required by GAAP. Cash used for purchases and originations of reverse loans held for investment, net of payments received decreased during the first quarter of 2014 compared to 2013 by $789.8 million as a result of a decrease in new origination volume in our reverse mortgage operations. Cash paid for business acquisitions and purchases of servicing rights also decreased $750.0 million during the first quarter of 2014 compared to 2013. We plan to continue acquiring servicing rights during the remainder of 2014.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.7 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the primary uses of cash was $1.1 billion for purchases and originations of reverse residential loans held for investment, $478.1 million in payments for the acquisitions of the ResCap net assets and the Ally Bank net assets as well as acquisitions of servicing rights of $305.0 million , which includes the BOA asset purchase. During the same period, the primary sources of cash provided by investing activities were the principal payments received from borrowers on our residential loans held for investment of $93.5 million and net cash proceeds from the sales of real estate owned of $6.1 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of $(134.4) million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $2.3 billion from $2.1 billion in 2013. The primary uses of cash in 2014 related to securing cash for our originations, reverse mortgage and servicing businesses. Cash generated from the securitization of reverse loans, net of payments on HMBS related obligations decreased $656.7 million as a result of a decrease in new origination volume in our reverse mortgage operations. Net cash borrowings from servicing advance liabilities used to fund advances for our servicing business decreased $117.6 million primarily as a result of the lack of funding of advances associated with bulk servicing right acquisitions in the first quarter of 2014 compared to 2013. Net cash borrowings on master repurchase agreements decreased $708.1 million due to a decline in origination volumes in both our forward mortgage originations business and reverse mortgage originations business. As discussed above, the originations of forward and reverse loans are included in operating and investing activities, respectively. Net cash generated from corporate debt financing activities decreased $798.7 million as a result of additional incremental borrowings under our 2012 Term Loan during the first quarter of 2013 with no comparable borrowings during the first quarter of 2014.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.1 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the primary sources of cash were $813.7 million in proceeds from issuance of corporate debt, net of debt issuance costs, $1.0 billion in proceeds from securitizations of reverse loans, $142.8 million in issuances of servicing advance liabilities, net of related payments, and $273.9 million in net borrowings of master repurchase agreements. During the same period, the primary uses of cash for financing activities were the payments on HMBS related obligations of $57.7 million and $49.5 million in payments on mortgage-backed debt.

95



Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk that we will not fully collect the principal we have invested due to borrower defaults. We manage the credit risk associated with our residential loan portfolio through monitoring of existing loans, early identification of problem loans, and timely resolution of problems.
Residential Loans Held For Investment
We are subject to credit risk associated with the residual interests that we own in the consolidated Residual Trusts as well as with the unencumbered forward loans held in our portfolio, both of which are recognized as residential loans at amortized cost, net on our consolidated balance sheets. We do not currently own residual interests in the Non-Residual Trusts and we consider our credit risk with regard to these trusts to be insignificant. However, we have assumed mandatory call obligations related to the Non-Residual Trusts and will be subject to a certain amount of credit risk associated with the purchased residential loans when the calls are exercised, which is when each loan pool falls to 10% of the original principal amount. We anticipate the mandatory call obligations to settle beginning in 2017 and continue through 2019 based upon our current cash flow projections for the Non-Residual Trusts. The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the respective call dates is $417.4 million .
Our reverse loans are insured by the FHA. Although performing and nonperforming loans are covered by FHA insurance, we may incur expenses and losses in the process of repurchasing and liquidating these loans that are not reimbursable by FHA in accordance with program guidelines. However we consider these amounts to be insignificant. Refer to additional information on reverse loan securitizations at the Liquidity and Capital Resources – Reverse Mortgage Origination Business section above and foreclosures of reverse loans at the Real Estate Market Risk section below. As a result of minimal or no severity, credit risk associated with the Non-Residual Trusts and reverse loans is not discussed further in this section.
At March 31, 2014, the carrying value of our held for investment residential loan portfolio that exposes us to credit risk was $ 1.4 billion . These loans are held primarily by our Loans and Residuals segment. The carrying value of residential loans and other collateral of the Residual Trusts total $1.5 billion and is permanently financed with $ 1.2 billion of mortgage-backed debt. Our credit exposure of $270.2 million associated with the Residual Trusts, which is calculated as the difference between the assets and liabilities of these VIEs, approximates our residual interests in these trusts.
The residential loans that expose us to credit risk are predominantly credit-challenged, non-conforming loans. These loans had an unpaid principal balance of $ 1.5 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 . In addition, 3.85% and 4.07% of these loans were 90 days or more past due at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. While we feel that our underwriting and servicing with regard to these loans will help to mitigate the risk of significant borrower default on these loans, we cannot assure you that all borrowers will continue to satisfy their payment obligations under these loans, thereby avoiding default.
Residential Loans Held For Sale
We are subject to credit risk associated with forward loans that we purchase and originate during the period of time prior to the transfer of these loans. We consider our credit risk associated with these loans to be insignificant as we hold the loans for a short period of time, typically less than 20 days, and the market for these loans continues to be highly liquid.
We sell our loans on a nonrecourse basis. We also provide representations and warranties to purchasers and insurers of the loans sold that typically are in place for the life of the loan. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, we may be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or indemnify the purchaser, and any subsequent loss on the mortgage loan may be borne by us. If there is no breach of a representation and warranty provision, we have no obligation to repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor against loss. The outstanding unpaid principal balance of loans sold by us represents the maximum potential exposure related to representation and warranty provisions. Refer to additional information regarding transfers of forward loans in Note 5 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We maintain a reserve for losses on loans repurchased or indemnified as a result of breaches of representations and warranties on our sold loans. Our reserve is based on assumptions related to defect rates, repurchase rates and ultimate credit losses on potential repurchases. These assumptions are based on market information where available and historical experience with similar loan portfolios. Our assumptions are affected by factors both internal and external in nature. Internal factors include, among other things, level of loan sales, as well as to whom the loans are sold, the expectation of credit loss on repurchases and indemnifications, our success rate at appealing repurchase demands and our ability to recover any losses from third parties. External factors that may affect our estimate include, among other things, the overall economic condition in the housing market, secondary market conditions, home prices, the economic condition of borrowers, the political environment at investor agencies and the overall U.S. and world economy. Many of the factors are beyond our control and may lead to judgments that are susceptible to change.

96



Real Estate Market Risk
We include on our consolidated balance sheets assets secured by real property and property obtained directly as a result of foreclosures. Residential property values are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; and retroactive changes to building or similar codes. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses.
The Company held real estate owned, net of $38.8 million , $34.5 million and $1.1 million in the Loans and Residuals, Reverse Mortgage, and Other segments, respectively, at March 31, 2014 . The Company held real estate owned, net of $45.3 million , $27.0 million and $1.3 million in the Loans and Residuals, Reverse Mortgage, and Other segments, respectively, at December 31, 2013 .
A nonperforming reverse loan whose maximum claim amount has not been met is generally foreclosed upon on behalf of Ginnie Mae with the real estate owned remaining in the securitization pool until liquidation. Although performing and nonperforming loans are covered by FHA insurance, we may incur expenses and losses in the process of repurchasing and liquidating these loans that are not reimbursable by FHA in accordance with program guidelines. However, we consider these amounts to be insignificant. The growth in the real estate owned portfolio held by the Reverse Mortgage segment was due to growth in our business and the typical flow of HECMs that move through the foreclosure process.
Counterparty Credit Risk
We are exposed to counterparty credit risk from the inability of counterparties to our forward loan and mortgage backed security purchase and loan sale agreements to meet the terms of those agreements. We minimize this risk through monitoring procedures and collateral requirements. Counterparty credit risk is taken into account when determining fair value, although its impact is diminished by daily margin posting on all forward sales and purchase derivatives.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have interests in VIEs that we do not consolidate as we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. In addition, we have interests in forward loans that have been sold with servicing retained. Refer to Note 4 and Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Other than the arrangements described in the footnotes referenced above, we do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose or VIEs, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not have any undisclosed borrowings or debt, and have not entered into any synthetic leases. We are, therefore, not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships other than those described above.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The critical accounting estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described in the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014. Provided below is a summary of goodwill as described in such Annual Report on Form 10-K and significant updates.
Goodwill
As a result of our various acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill which represents the excess of the consideration paid for a business combination over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate potential impairment.
We have the option of performing a qualitative assessment of impairment to determine whether any further quantitative testing for impairment is necessary. Our qualitative assessment will use judgments including but not limited to changes in the general economic environment, industry and regulatory considerations, current economic performance compared to historical economic performance and anticipated business changes including the discontinuance of services or losses of key contracts, where applicable. If we elect to bypass the qualitative assessment or if we determine, based upon our assessment of those qualitative factors that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its net carrying value, a quantitative assessment is required. We determine the fair value of the reporting unit being evaluated using valuation techniques we believe market participants would use, including

97



estimated future discounted cash flows, market multiples and/or appraised values. Significant judgments and estimates are used in the determination of reporting unit fair value. Discounted cash flow analyses utilize sensitive estimates including, projections of revenues and operating costs considering historical and anticipated future results, general economic and market conditions, discount rates, as well as the impact of planned business or operational strategies. The valuations employ a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value and take into consideration relevant market factors. Changes in judgments and projections could result in a significantly different estimate of the fair value of the reporting units and could result in an impairment of goodwill.
We completed a qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment on our Servicing and ARM reporting units during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2013, and based on that assessment we believe it is more likely than not that the fair values of these reporting units substantially exceed their carrying values. This conclusion was reached primarily based upon the actual operating results for both reporting units compared to planned results during 2013. Both reporting units exceeded planned revenues and Adjusted EBITDA. We bypassed the qualitative assessment for the Originations reporting unit primarily as a result of the need to establish a quantitative baseline for this newly established reporting unit. The qualitative assessment for the Reverse Mortgage and Insurance reporting units was considered, however, regulatory changes in the respective industries which could have a negative impact on future projected earnings and cash flows resulted in the need to complete a quantitative assessment. Based on the quantitative impairment test performed on all three of these reporting units, we concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit was determined to be greater than their respective carrying values. Thus, there were no goodwill impairment charges recorded in the year ended December 31, 2013.

Due to recent regulatory developments surrounding lender-place insurance policies, we expect our sales commissions related to lender-placed insurance policies to decrease significantly beginning in the second quarter of 2014. The Company has considered this commission reduction in its quantitative impairment test performed in 2013, however, if the reduction is larger than anticipated, goodwill allocated to the Insurance segment could be impaired at a future date. If the cash flow projections utilized in its quantitative impairment test were reduced by more than 15%, would result in a failure of the initial quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company is actively looking for alternatives to preserve or replace revenue streams in its Insurance business. However, there is no assurance that the Company’s efforts will be successful.

During 2013, HUD announced certain changes to the HECM program that have impacted the reverse mortgage products available to borrowers and have created new regulatory requirements, with additional program changes that may become effective in 2014. The Company is developing new correspondent relationships and related pricing strategies, as well as implementing a strategic initiative to further enhance and grow its retail channel in anticipation of the new industry program changes and regulatory requirements, and remains optimistic on the potential of the reverse mortgage product to generate positive cash flows over the long-term. While the Company is currently experiencing a slowing in reverse loan origination volume as the market adjusts to the regulatory and program changes, the Company expects the new reverse mortgage products will be attractive to borrowers. In the meantime, the Company is focused on cost-saving opportunities. Additionally, the Company has a pipeline of potential servicing transfers and flow arrangements to augment the growth potential for the reverse business. The cash flow projections that support the reverse mortgage reporting unit Step 1 impairment test contemplate volume growth during 2014 and 2015 as the market responds to the new product, the Company expands its correspondent relationships to create additional volume and new servicing transfer and flow agreements are established from our pipeline. The volume projections return to more normalized growth in 2016 and beyond. The full impact of these regulatory developments and product changes remain uncertain and should the market be slower to respond than the Company anticipates, or should additional regulatory developments hinder future growth, the goodwill associated with the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit could become impaired. A decrease in cash flows of greater than 25% over the cash flow projection period, would result in a failure of the initial quantitative goodwill impairment test. Significant assumptions impacting cash flows are margins, volumes and expenses.

Refer to Note 2 in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014 for our policy in accounting for goodwill.

98



ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We seek to manage the risks inherent in our business — including but not limited to credit risk, liquidity risk, real estate market risk, and interest rate risk — in a prudent manner designed to enhance our earnings and preserve our capital. In general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from historical experience, to actively manage such risks, and to maintain capital levels consistent with these risks. For information regarding our credit risk, real estate market risk and liquidity risk refer to the Credit Risk Management, Real Estate Market Risk and Liquidity and Capital Resources sections above in Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk of changing interest rates in the market place. Our primary interest rate risk exposure relates to servicing rights carried at fair value, loans held for sale and related derivatives, and other variable rate assets and liabilities.
Servicing Rights, Loans Held for Sale and Related Freestanding Derivatives
Sensitivity Analysis
The following table summarizes the estimated change in the fair value of our servicing rights carried at fair value and residential loans held for sale and related derivatives given hypothetical instantaneous parallel shifts in the interest rate yield curve (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2014
 
Down 50 bps
 
Down 25 bps
 
Up 25 bps
 
Up 50 bps
Increase (decrease) in assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential loans held for sale
$
13,820

 
$
7,481

 
$
(8,161
)
 
$
(16,970
)
Servicing rights carried at fair value
(189,814
)
 
(95,030
)
 
84,665

 
160,329

Other assets (freestanding derivatives) (1)
(55,531
)
 
(29,769
)
 
32,145

 
66,838

Total change in assets
$
(231,525
)
 
$
(117,318
)
 
$
108,649

 
$
210,197

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities (freestanding derivatives) (1)
$
(39,940
)
 
$
(21,897
)
 
$
24,182

 
$
50,529

Total change in liabilities
(39,940
)
 
(21,897
)
 
24,182

 
50,529

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change
$
(191,585
)
 
$
(95,421
)
 
$
84,467

 
$
159,668

_______
(1) Consists of IRLCs and forward sales commitments
We used March 31, 2014 market rates on our instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis. These sensitivities are hypothetical and presented for illustrative purposes only. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in fair value may not be linear.
Servicing Rights
Servicing rights are subject to prepayment risk as the mortgage loans underlying the servicing rights permit the borrowers to prepay the loans. Consequently, the value of these servicing rights generally tend to diminish in periods of declining interest rates (as prepayments increase) and tend to increase in periods of rising interest rates (as prepayments decrease). Although the level of interest rates is a key driver of prepayment activity, there are other factors that influence prepayments, including home prices, underwriting standards and product characteristics.
Loans Held for Sale and Related Freestanding Derivatives
We are subject to interest rate and price risk on forward loans held for sale during the short time from the loan funding date until the date the loan is sold into the secondary market. Interest rate lock commitments represent an agreement to extend credit to a mortgage loan applicant or to purchase loans from a third-party originator, collectively referred to as IRLC, whereby the interest rate of the loan is set prior to funding or purchase. Outstanding IRLCs are subject to interest rate risk and related price risk during the period from the date of the commitment through the loan funding date or expiration date. Loan commitments generally range from 35 to 50 days from lock to funding, and our holding period of the mortgage loan from funding to sale is typically less than 20 days.

99



An integral component of our interest rate risk management strategy is our use of freestanding derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in interest rates that affect the value of our IRLCs and forward loans held for sale. The derivatives utilized to hedge the interest rate risk are forward sales commitments, which are forward sales of agency "to be announced" securities, or TBAs. These TBAs are primarily used to fix the forward sales price that will be realized upon the sale of the mortgage loans into the secondary market.
Other Variable Rate Assets and Liabilities
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about interest rate risk on other variable rate assets and liabilities, refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014. These risks have not changed materially since December 31, 2013.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2014. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2014, the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

100



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in litigation, investigations and claims arising out of the normal conduct of our business. We estimate and accrue liabilities resulting from such matters based on a variety of factors, including outstanding legal claims and proposed settlements and assessments by internal counsel of pending or threatened litigation. These accruals are recorded when the costs are determined to be probable and are reasonably estimable. We believe we have adequately accrued for these potential liabilities; however, facts and circumstances may change that could cause the actual liabilities to exceed the estimates, or that may require adjustments to the recorded liability balances in the future.
In response to a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, from the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, issued in November 2010 and a CID from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, in September 2012, Green Tree Servicing, LLC, or Green Tree Servicing, has produced documents and other information concerning a wide range of its loan servicing operations. On October 7, 2013, the CFPB notified Green Tree Servicing that the CFPB’s staff is considering recommending that the CFPB take action against Green Tree Servicing for alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. On February 20, 2014, the FTC and CFPB staff advised Green Tree Servicing that they had sought authority to bring an enforcement action and negotiate a resolution related to alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. Our understanding is that the CFPB staff now has authority to commence an action against Green Tree and that the FTC staff has authority to negotiate but would need further FTC approval to file such an action. In April 2014, Green Tree Servicing began discussions with the FTC and CFPB staffs to determine if a settlement of the proposed action could be achieved, and those discussions are ongoing. We are unable to predict whether the proposed action will be settled or what the terms of any such settlement may be. Any such settlement may involve an injunction against violating various consumer protection statutes and may result in other changes to our business practices. A settlement may also entail penalties, consumer restitution, and increased government reporting obligations. We cannot provide any assurance that the FTC and/or CFPB will not take legal action against us or that the allegations made by the FTC and/or CFPB or the outcome of any such action or settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
On October 2, 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, Office of Inspector General requesting documents and other information concerning (i) the curtailment of interest payments on Home Equity Conversion Mortgages, or HECMs, serviced or sub-serviced by Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., or RMS, and (ii) RMS’ contractual arrangements with a third-party vendor for the management and disposition of real estate owned properties. The Company is responding to the subpoena and at this stage does not have sufficient information to make an assessment of the outcome or impact of HUD’s investigation.
On March 7, 2014, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Mark O’Brien, Charles Cauthen, Denmar Dixon, Marc Helm and Robert Yeary captioned Beck v. Walter Investment Management Corp., et al., No. 1:14-cv-20880 (S.D. Fla.). The complaint asserts federal securities law claims against the Company and the individual defendants under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Additional claims are asserted against the individual defendants under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaint alleges that between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014 the Company and the individual defendants made material misstatements or omissions relating to the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting, the liabilities associated with the Company’s acquisition of Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., or RMS, RMS's internal controls, and certain of the Company's business practices that are being reviewed by the FTC and the CFPB. The complaint seeks class certification and an unspecified amount of damages on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s securities between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014. We cannot provide any assurance as to the disposition of the complaint or that such disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
As various federal and state regulators continue to investigate perceived causes and consequences of the financial crisis, we expect that we may receive general information requests from other agencies. We would cooperate in any such investigation.
As discussed in Notes 19 and 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report, Walter Energy is in disputes with the IRS on a number of federal income tax issues. Walter Energy has stated in its public filings that it believes that all of its current and prior tax filing positions have substantial merit and that Walter Energy intends to defend vigorously any tax claims asserted. Under the terms of the tax separation agreement between us and Walter Energy dated April 17, 2009, Walter Energy is responsible for the payment of all federal income taxes (including any interest or penalties applicable thereto) of the consolidated group, which includes the aforementioned claims of the IRS. However, to the extent that Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, we could be responsible for any unpaid amounts.
We are, and expect that we will continue to be, involved in litigation, arbitration, investigations, and claims in the ordinary course of business, including purported class actions and other legal proceedings challenging whether certain of our residential loan servicing practices and other aspects of our business comply with applicable laws and regulatory

101



requirements. These legal proceedings include, among other things, putative class action claims concerning alleged "force-placed insurance," the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal and state laws and statutes. The outcome of these legal proceedings is uncertain, and it is possible that adverse results in such proceedings (which could include penalties, punitive damages and injunctive relief affecting our business practices) could have a material adverse effect on our prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed below and in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described below and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Servicing of mortgage loans subject to National Mortgage Settlement
In connection with our purchase of Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs, from Residential Capital LLC, or ResCap, on January 31, 2013, we agreed to service the mortgage loans for which the MSRs were acquired in accordance with the servicing standards set forth in the 2012 National Mortgage Settlement to which ResCap was a party. During initial testing of our adherence to these servicing standards, we determined that we had not complied with various metrics. We have reported our findings to the Monitor under the National Mortgage Settlement and are developing corrective action plans designed to address and cure the root causes of the non-compliance and to prevent future recurrences. These plans will be subject to approval of the Monitor. These incidents may cause us reputational damage, and we cannot predict whether or to what extent our business could be adversely affected. We may be obligated to indemnify ResCap in the event ResCap is fined or penalized as a result of our conduct.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
a)
Not applicable.
b)
Not applicable.
c)
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index, which appears immediately following the signature page below, are included or incorporated by reference herein.

102



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP.
 
 
 
 
 
Dated: May 8, 2014
 
By:
 
/s/ Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
 
Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Authorized Signatory)
 
 
 
 
 
Dated: May 8, 2014
 
By:
 
/s/ Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
 
Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 

103



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
 
Note
 
Description
 
 
 
 
 
10.1*
 
(2)
 
Addendum entered into March 27, 2014 and effective April 1, 2014, to that Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated March 23, 2005, made by and between Fannie Mae and Green Tree Servicing LLC.
 
 
 
 
 
10.2
 
(2)
 
Guaranty made by Walter Investment Management Corp. for the benefit of Fannie Mae dated March 17, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
10.3†
 
(1)
 
Employment Agreement between the Company and Gary L.Tillett dated January 28, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
31.1
 
(2)
 
Certification by Mark J. O’Brien pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
31.2
 
(2)
 
Certification by Gary L. Tillett pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
32
 
(2)
 
Certification by Mark J. O’Brien and Gary L. Tillett pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1352, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
101
 
(2)
 
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) — The following materials from Walter Investment Management Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
 
*
Certain information has been omitted from this exhibit and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Note
 
Notes to Exhibit Index
 
 
 
(1)
 
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2014.
 
 
 
(2)
 
Filed herewith.


104


EXHIBIT 10.1

Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as [***]. A complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


ADDENDUM
TO
MORTGAGE SELLING AND SERVICING CONTRACT
(Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement)

This Addendum (the “EAR Agreement”) to that Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated March 23, 2005 (the "MSSC”) is made by and between Fannie Mae (“Fannie Mae”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States, and Green Tree Servicing LLC (“Servicer”), a Delaware limited liability company, and is effective April1, 2014.
 
WHEREAS, Servicer services, on behalf of Fannie Mae, certain residential mortgage loans and real estate owned (REO) properties owned or securitized by Fannie Mae, in accordance with the MSSC and Fannie Mae Servicing Guide; and
WHEREAS, Fannie Mae and Green Tree have entered into those certain servicing agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”) as follows:
a) Mortgage Loans Servicing Agreement dated June 30, 2008 (“Option One” portfolio);
b) Mortgage Loans Servicing Agreement dated July 31, 2008 (“Barclays” portfolio);
c) Interim Servicing Addendum to the Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated March 19, 2009 (“Bank United” portfolio);
d) Green Tree Supplemental Servicing Agreement dated October 31, 2009 (“Nat City” portfolio);
e) Subservicing Addendum to the Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated February 1, 2010 (“Hayhurst” portfolio);
d) Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract as applicable to loans transferred from Franklin Bank (“Franklin Bank” portfolio), and
WHEREAS, Fannie Mae has agreed to provide to Servicer early reimbursement of certain Advances;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and conditions contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
I. Addendum to MSSC . Fannie Mae agrees to provide to Servicer early reimbursement of certain advances relating to loans and REO properties serviced under the MSSC, any Master Agreement and Fannie Mae Servicing Guide and under the Agreements pursuant to and subject to the conditions of the attached Exhibit A . This EAR Agreement replaces and supersedes in its entirety that Addendum to Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated effective July 1, 2012, as thereafter amended (the “EAF Agreement”)..

II. Applicable Laws . This EAR Agreement will be construed in accordance with federal law and the laws of New York, without reference to the choice of law principles under the laws of New York.




III. Entire Agreement . All other terms, conditions, provisions, and covenants in the Agreements, the MSSC and the Fannie Mae Selling and Servicing Guides, as may be updated or amended from time to time, shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect, except as modified by this EAR Agreement.

IV. Counterparts . This EAR Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute a single agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties to this EAR Agreement has caused this EAR Agreement to be duly executed in its name by one of its duly authorized officers, all as of the date first above written.

Fannie Mae

 
Green Tree Servicing LLC
(Servicer)
By:
/s/ Tara Malone
 
By:
/s/ Cheryl Collins
Name:
Tara Malone
 
Name:
Cheryl Collins
Title:
Vice President
 
Title:
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Date:
3/31/14
 
Date:
3/31/14




EXHBIT A

EARLY ADVANCE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT

EARLY REIMBURSEMENT PERIOD:

The period (“Early Reimbursement Period”) during which Fannie Mae will make payments of Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts (as defined below) in respect of Eligible Advances (as defined below), which will commence on the Closing Date and end on the first to occur of:
1.    March 31, 2015 (unless extended or renewed in writing by Fannie Mae and Servicer); or

2.    a Stop Event that is not waived by Fannie Mae

During the Early Reimbursement Period, Fannie Mae will make payments of Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts as provided herein. Upon termination of the Early Reimbursement Period, Fannie Mae will no longer pay Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts and the Recoupment Period will commence.
 
 



ELIGIBLE ADVANCES FOR EARLY REIMBURSEMENT :

Except as provided below, “Eligible Advance” shall include all of the following advances required to be made by the Servicer with respect to mortgage loans and real estate owned (REO) serviced by the Servicer (“Mortgage Loans”) pursuant to the MSSC and Fannie Mae Servicing Guide (the “Guide”) and the Agreements for which Servicer has not been repaid or reimbursed as of such date and which relate to mortgage loans directly originated by Servicer, or mortgage loans the servicing or subservicing rights to which were acquired from a third party as identified in Schedule 1:

1.    “P&I Delinquency Advances” which are advances of principal or interest payments, including a “Foreclosure Buyout”). A “Foreclosure Buyout” is an advance required to be remitted as the result of an action taken during the preceding month with respect to a property reported under Fannie Mae Action Codes 70, 71 or 72 at the start of the month in which the advance is due.

2.    “T&I Escrow Advances” which are advances for the payment of taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, ground rents, and other similar items and charges, and

3.    “Corporate Servicing Advances” which are advances other than P&I Delinquency Advances and T&I Escrow Advances.

Eligible Advances shall also include any outstanding P&I Delinquency Advances, T&I Escrow Advances and Corporate Servicing Advances previously paid or reimbursed by Servicer and identified on Schedule 2 in connection with a servicing transfer to the Servicer. Each such advance shall be deemed a “Legacy Servicing Advance”.

Notwithstanding the foregoing and except as identified in Schedules 1 and 2, Eligible Advances shall not include advances paid or reimbursed by Servicer in connection with a servicing transfer to the Servicer, including servicing transfers after the date of this EAR Agreement. However, the parties may by written agreement add additional Eligible Advances to Schedules 1 and 2   (as applicable), which Eligible Advances shall be deemed incorporated into the EAR Agreement.

Eligible Advances also shall not include advances applicable to the payment of any guaranty or excess servicing fees or lender paid mortgage insurance premiums. Eligible Advances must have been actually incurred by the Servicer, and T&I Escrow Advances and Corporate Servicing Advances must fall under one of the 571 Codes in the Fannie Mae 571 Claims Guide.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, after the date on which the underlying real estate/collateral is sold or disposed, the loan or REO Property is otherwise “liquidated” (including as a result of an event reported as Fannie Mae Action Code of 70, 71 or 72), or loans have a zero UPB as a result of an event reported as Fannie Mae Action Code of 60 or 65 (the “Final Liquidation Date”), no Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts will be paid by Fannie Mae for advances made by the Servicer after the Final Liquidation Date on that Mortgage Loan. In addition, all Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts must be repaid within one-hundred twenty (120) days after the Final Liquidation Date of the related loan, regardless of whether recoveries have actually been collected.

Servicer shall not draw on any third party financing or other facility funds for use to pay amounts attributable to Eligible Advances for which Fannie Mae has made payment to Servicer of Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts unless Servicer reduces the applicable Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount by a commensurate amount. Any such amounts shall be considered a collection or reimbursement related to Eligible Advances and be immediately deposited by the Servicer into a Collections Account.




 
 
PERIODIC EARLY REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT :
For any Reporting Cycle (as defined below), an amount equal to the Funding Value (as defined below) of Eligible Advances, subject to the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit (as defined below).

If the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit is reached in a particular Reporting Cycle, Fannie Mae shall reimburse P&I Delinquency Advances before T&I Escrow Advances or Corporate Servicing Advances and, within each category, Eligible Advances applicable to Mortgage Loans held directly by Fannie Mae (“MRS Advances”) prior to those Mortgage Loans held in an MBS trust (“MBS Advances”.)
 
 
AGGREGATE EARLY REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT:
As of any date of determination, the excess, if any, of (i) the total Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts previously paid to Servicer by Fannie Mae prior to such date over (ii) the aggregate, cumulative amount of Collections (as defined below) recouped by Fannie Mae prior to such date. In no event shall Fannie Mae be obligated to make payment of any Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount that would result in the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount exceeding the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit.

FUNDING VALUE:
With respect to any Eligible Advance as of any date of determination, the product of (x) the outstanding balance of such Eligible Advance as of such date and (y) the applicable Early Reimbursement Rate.
 
 



EARLY REIMBURSEMENT RATE:
P&I Delinquency Advances: [ *** ]%.
T&I Escrow Advances: [ *** ]%
Corporate Servicing Advances: [ *** ]%

Legacy Servicing Advances shall have an Early Reimbursement Rate as provided in Schedule 2.

The Early Reimbursement Rate for T&I Escrow Advances, Corporate Servicing Advances and Legacy Servicing Advances (excluding Legacy Servicing Advances which constitute P&I Delinquency Advances) will be recalculated on the first day of each calendar quarter and will be based on the average cumulative Aged Advance Utilization Rate for the immediately preceding three (3) calendar months as follows:
   

For purposes of this calculation, “Aged Advance Utilization Rate” shall mean the percentage of 1) the total of Eligible Advances applicable to Mortgage Loans on which the underlying real estate/collateral is sold or disposed, the loan or REO Property is otherwise “liquidated” (including as a result of an event reported as Fannie Mae Action Code of 70, 71 or 72), or loans have a zero UPB as a result of an event reported as Fannie Mae Action Code of 60 or 65, divided by 2) the amount of Eligible Advances applicable to such Mortgage Loans previously reimbursed by Fannie Mae to Servicer under this EAR Agreement or the EAF Agreement. An Aged Advance Utilization Rate of less than [ *** ]% may be considered a Stop Event by Fannie Mae. Any revised Early Reimbursement Rate shall become effective for the Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount applicable to the next Reporting Cycle ninety (90) days after the Servicer is notified in writing by Fannie Mae of any revision.
With respect to Mortgage Loans where Hayhurst Mortgage, Inc. or Bank United was the original advancing servicer, any Eligible Advances related to such servicing transfers will not be included in Aged Advance Utilization Rate calculations.

 
 
EARLY REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT LIMIT:
Fannie Mae's obligation to make payment of Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts will not exceed a maximum Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount of Nine-Hundred Fifty Million ($950,000,000) dollars.
 
 
DEFICIENCY AMOUNT:
A Deficiency Amount shall exist on any date if, and to the extent that, on such date, the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount exceeds the Funding Value of all Eligible Advances. If a Deficiency Amount exists, the party that becomes aware of such event shall immediately notify the other party of the existence of any Deficiency Amount. Any such Deficiency Amount shall be cured by the Servicer within three business days of the Servicer becoming aware of the existence of a Deficiency Amount. Any Deficiency Amount attributable to the reduction of an Early Reimbursement Rate as provided herein shall be due and payable by Servicer within sixty (60) days.



 
 
FANNIE MAE DESIGNATED ACCOUNT:

“Designated Account” shall mean a Fannie Mae designated account created by Fannie Mae in its name and under its control at a financial institution of Fannie Mae’s choosing. A Designated Account may relate to either MBS Advances or MRS Advances but not both.

The Servicer hereby acknowledges and agrees that it has no right, title, interest or claim in or to any Designated Account or any funds or other assets therein (whether or not deposited by the Servicer), or any interest earned or accrued on the foregoing (notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Guide or in any other agreement), all of which shall be the exclusive property of Fannie Mae.

 
 



ONGOING RECONCILIATION PERIOD:
Anytime an Eligible Advance is requested by Servicer hereunder, Servicer shall provide Fannie Mae an Advance Request Form, a sample of which is attached hereto as Schedule 3, and shall deliver such request form via e-mail to “advance_facilities_data@fanniemae.com”.

Beginning in the month of the effective date of this EAR Agreement, Servicer shall deliver the Reports (as defined below) as required in the Data Dictionary

The calendar month covered by a Report, as applicable, shall constitute a “Reporting Cycle.”

P&I Delinquency Advances .
No later than the second business day following the receipt by Fannie Mae of the Report applicable to P&I Delinquency Advances, Fannie Mae will notify the Servicer of any discrepancies, including any discrepancies between the (a) the sum of all reported loan-level P&I Delinquency Advances and (b) the aggregate P&I Delinquency Advances requested by the Servicer.

On the business day each month prior to the draft date applicable to the standard Fannie Mae MBS remittance cycle (the “Draft Date”) published in the Guide, the following actions shall occur:

(i)    to the extent a Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount is required to be distributed, Fannie Mae shall deposit (such deposit shall be contingent on the fact that no discrepancy regarding the requested P&I Delinquency Advances remains outstanding) into the Designated Account the Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount relating to the P&I Delinquency Advances for the related Reporting Cycle; and

(ii)    by 10:00 AM (Eastern Time) on such date, the Servicer shall deposit all remaining principal and interest required to be remitted on the Draft Date for all Fannie Mae MBS Mortgage Loans serviced by the Servicer.

On the Draft Date, Fannie Mae shall draft from the Designated Account, in lieu of the Servicer’s custodial account or accounts, the Required P&I and any amounts deposited by Fannie Mae as Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts.

The Servicer shall deposit into the Collections Account on the Draft Date any principal and interest reported as “uncollected” on the Report, and received between the business day immediately preceding the Report Date and the Draft Date.

T&I Escrow Advances and Corporate Servicing Advances.
No later than the second business day following the Report Date applicable to T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances, Fannie Mae will notify the Servicer of any discrepancies regarding T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances.

Servicer may also receive Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts at month end by submitting to Fannie Mae a Report applicable T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances six business days prior to month end. No later than the second business day following receipt of this Report Fannie Mae will notify the Servicer of any discrepancies regarding T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances

On the business day immediately preceding both the Draft Date and the last business day of the month, Fannie Mae shall fund (to the extent a Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount is required to be distributed) the Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount for T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances (as requested by the Servicer on an Advance Request Form) to the Servicer. Such funding shall be contingent on the fact that no discrepancy regarding the requested T&I Escrow Advances and Corporate Servicing Advances remains outstanding.
Subject to the conditions identified below, Fannie Mae additionally agrees that it will reimburse Servicer for T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances on a daily basis as may be requested by Servicer and agreed to by Fannie Mae. Therefore in addition to the reporting requirements identified herein, not later than the fifth (5 th ) business day prior to the business day on which Servicer requests that Fannie Mae make reimbursement to Servicer (or such other time period as mutually agreed to by the parties), Servicer shall deliver to Fannie Mae or its designee a Report applicable to T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances. Fannie Mae and/or its designee will reconcile the same within five (5) business days, and if it determines that an amount is due and owing by Fannie Mae to Servicer, such amount shall be reimbursed to Servicer by Fannie Mae on the date requested by Servicer, or at such time as may otherwise be mutually agreed to by Fannie Mae and Servicer. Applicable to each reimbursement of T&I Escrow Advances and Corporate Servicing Advances made by Fannie Mae herein, Servicer shall pay Fannie Mae a fee equal to the greater of 1) $[ *** ], or 2) the Compensation Rate divided by twenty-four (24), multiplied by the T&I Escrow Advance and Corporate Servicing Advances reimbursed by Fannie Mae. Servicer will not be required to pay such administrative fee for the reimbursements made 1) on the business day immediately preceding the Draft Date, and 2) one business day prior to the last business day of each calendar month. Fannie Mae will provide to Servicer an invoice for such administrative fees on or about the tenth (10 th ) day of each calendar month, and within thirty days of receipt of the invoice Servicer agrees to wire to Fannie Mae such invoiced amount as directed in the invoice, or as otherwise directed by Fannie Mae.

At any time Fannie Mae may notify the Servicer of any material discrepancy between the P&I Delinquency Advances, T&I Escrow Advances or Corporate Servicing Advances   as previously reported by the Servicer and the amounts reflected in Fannie Mae’s internal systems of record. Such discrepancies shall constitute a material Due Diligence issue and the Servicer and Fannie Mae will work in good faith to resolve any such material discrepancies.




 
 
REPORTS:

In addition to any required reporting obligations in the Guide, during the Ongoing Reconciliation Period and through the term of this Agreement Servicer shall deliver to Fannie Mae or its designee reports and loan level listings (each a “Report”) in a format reasonably acceptable to Fannie Mae containing the data and within the time periods identified in Schedule 4   (“EAR Data Dictionary”) to this EAR Agreement (as such Attachment may be modified by Fannie Mae in writing from time to time), including (i) such reason codes to conform to information and codes required by Fannie Mae Form 571 (Cash Disbursement Request) and (ii) upon request, reconciliations and supporting documentation (including invoices) of general ledger receivables applicable to Eligible Advances.

The Servicer shall also provide to Fannie Mae by the 25th day of each month (i) provided that a P&I Delinquency Advance was made, a completed Fannie Mae Form 496 (“Principal and Interest (P&I) Custodial Account Analysis”) including all applicable schedules, and (ii) Fannie Mae Form 496a (“Taxes and Insurance (T&I) Custodial Account Analysis”), including all applicable schedules.
 
 



COLLECTIONS ACCOUNT
OVER COLLECTION:

All collections and reimbursements related to Eligible Advances, other than Foreclosure Buyouts, received on the related Mortgage Loans by the Servicer from Fannie Mae, mortgagors or as liquidation proceeds or other recoveries (in the aggregate, the “Collections”), must be deposited by the Servicer into a Collections Account established by Fannie Mae and under Fannie Mae's control no later than 6:00 pm ET on the second business day following Servicer’s receipt thereof, subject to the following:

(i)    During the Early Reimbursement Period the Servicer may retain any Collections in excess of the Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount outstanding with respect to the related Mortgage Loan; and

(ii)    During the period between the final disbursement of a Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount and the last day for recoupment as provided below, the Servicer may retain any Collections in excess of the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount.

All Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts related to Foreclosure Buyouts shall be repaid to the Collections Account within one business day after the Servicer receives a monthly reimbursement of foreclosure advances from Fannie Mae, without regard to the amount actually reimbursed. Further, all Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts for P&I Delinquency Advances and applicable to Mortgage Loans which have undergone a reclassification as provided in the Guide shall be repaid to the Collections Account within two business days of such reclassification.

However, following the occurrence of, and during the continuance of, a Stop Event that has not been waived by Fannie Mae, clauses (i) and (ii) above shall not apply and further, all reimbursements of Eligible Advances due from Fannie Mae shall be deposited directly into the Collections Account by Fannie Mae.

Servicer shall notify Fannie Mae in the event it determines that any Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount relates to an advance other than an Eligible Advance. In addition, Fannie Mae shall provide Servicer with a monthly report listing any Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts outstanding on advances it has determined to be ineligible, including any relating to loans more than one hundred twenty (120) days past their Final Liquidation Date. Servicer shall deposit any such amounts into the Collections Account within 15 calendar days after the date of such determination or report, regardless of whether recoveries have actually been collected.

If the amount in the Collections Account exceeds the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount (“Over Collection”), then simultaneously with the first to occur of the payment of the next Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount or the commencement of the Recoupment Period, the Over Collection amount shall be applied to reduce the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount outstanding. Any amount by which the Over Collection exceeds such Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount will be returned to the Servicer within five business days following the date the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount is reduced to zero.




 
 
MONTHLY SETTLEMENTS / SETTLEMENT DATES:
On the third business day of each month, Fannie Mae shall notify Servicer of the Early Reimbursement Compensation amount. On the fifth business day of each calendar month, Servicer shall fund to an account designated by Fannie Mae the Early Reimbursement Compensation. Such date shall be deemed a “Settlement Date.”

In the event that Fannie Mae does not timely receive such funding, on the following business day Fannie Mae may withdraw an amount equal to such unpaid Early Reimbursement Compensation directly from the Collections Account prior to the calculation of the Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount for that month. Such withdrawal will not avoid the occurrence of a Stop Event.

Following the occurrence of, and during the continuance of, a Stop Event that has not been waived by Fannie Mae, a Settlement Dates shall occur with such frequency ( e.g. ,  weekly or daily) as Fannie Mae shall direct.
 
 
EARLY REIMBURSEMENT COMPENSATION:
In consideration of Fannie Mae’s reimbursing to Servicer Eligible Advances earlier than as provided under the MSSC and Guide, the Servicer will pay Fannie Mae a monthly compensation amount equal to the aggregate amount obtained by daily application of the Compensation Rate to the amount of the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount on a 360 day per year basis for the actual number of days elapsed since the prior Settlement Date (or, with respect to the first Settlement Date following the Closing Date, since the Closing Date). The Servicer will pay the Early Reimbursement Compensation to Fannie Mae on each Settlement Date.
 
 
COMPENSATION RATE:
250 basis points over One-Month LIBOR. LIBOR will be set as of the last business day of the second month preceding the month in which the Settlement Date occurs. ( For example, if the Settlement Date is August 3 rd , LIBOR will be as of the last business day in June. ) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Rate shall be 350 basis points over One-Month LIBOR on Eligible Advances related to those mortgage servicing rights acquired by Servicer from a) Bank of America, National Association on or about January 31, 2013 (including BANA Legacy Servicing Advances), and b) GMAC Mortgage, LLC on or about January 31, 2013 (including GMACM Legacy Servicing Advances).

 
 
FACILITY RENEWAL/AMENDMENT FEE:
On the Closing Date Servicer shall pay [ *** ]% per annum of the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit. If extended or renewed in writing by Fannie Mae and Servicer, [ *** ]% per annum of the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit shall thereafter be payable as a renewal fee on the first business day after such renewal date. If the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit is increased, [ *** ]% of the additional amount shall be payable as an Amendment Fee on the first business day following the effective date of the increase and pro rated from such effective date to the scheduled end of the Early Reimbursement Period.
 
 



CLOSING DATE:
April 1, 2014
 
 
RECOUPMENT:
Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts shall be recouped by Fannie Mae primarily through Collections, however the Servicer can pay any or all outstanding amounts due at any time, and is obligated to pay, if applicable, the outstanding Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount on or prior to the completion of an eighteen (18) month period starting on the earlier of (i) the first day of the month following the end of the Early Reimbursement Period or (ii) the occurrence of a Stop Event. Such eighteen (18) month period is referred to herein as the “Recoupment Period.”
 
 



STOP EVENTS:
Unless otherwise waived by Fannie Mae, Stop Events are as follows:

1.    Failure of Servicer to comply with the terms or conditions of this EAR Agreement and such failure continues for 1 business day, specifically including but not limited to,
a.    Failure of the Servicer to pay any Early Reimbursement Compensation amount or any Deficiency Amount when due.
b.    Failure of the Servicer to deposit Collections into the Collection Account by 6:00 pm ET on the second business day following the receipt thereof by Servicer.
c.    Failure of the Servicer to repay in a timely manner any portion of the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount relating to an advance that is not an Eligible Advance.
 
2.    Failure of the Servicer to be an approved Fannie Mae Servicer.
3.    Occurrence of a change in the Servicer’s organization as described in the Part I, Chapter 2, Section 204 of the Guide.
4.    Failure of the Servicer to resolve a material Due Diligence issue within 30 business days of notification, unless the parties mutually agree to extend such cure period, it being understood that (a) Fannie Mae has the option to suspend funding of Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts while a material Due Diligence issue remains unresolved, even if no Stop Event has occurred, and (b) Fannie Mae will act in good faith to determine materiality of Due Diligence issues.
5.    Insolvency, Receivership or Bankruptcy of the Servicer, as established by a court of competent jurisdiction.
6.    Failure of the Servicer to submit any required Reports or other reporting and such failure continues for 5 business days
7.    The occurrence of an Event of Default by the Servicer under any Master Agreement or the MSSC, as applicable, which has not been waived or cured as may be allowed under such agreement or contract, if applicable.
8.    Failure by the Servicer to deposit into the Designated Account all principal and interest as provided herein; provided, however, that such failure shall be subject to a cure period of one business day; provided, further, however, that such cure period shall be unavailable if such failure occurs more than once in any four-month period or more than twice in any twelve-month period.
9.    The Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount is zero.
10.    120 days after written notice by Fannie Mae.
11.    The earlier of 120 days or such earlier date as set forth in such Proceeding following written notice by Fannie Mae or Servicer, as applicable, that either Fannie Mae or Servicer, as applicable, becomes subject to any order, or litigation, claim, action, suit, arbitration, inquiry, proceeding, investigation or similar proceeding initiated by a governmental authority (a “Proceeding”) which impairs such party’s ability to discharge its obligations hereunder in any material respect.

Upon occurrence of a Stop Event not waived by Fannie Mae, the Early Reimbursement Period may be terminated.

Upon the occurrence of a subsection 10 or 11 Stop Event, Fannie Mae shall cooperate in good faith and reasonably assist the Servicer should the Servicer elect to seek alternative financing for some or all of the (i) outstanding Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts and (ii) future P&I Delinquency Advances, T&I Escrow Advances and Corporate Servicing Advances required to be made by the Servicer under each of the Agreements.



 
 
DUE DILIGENCE REQUIREMENTS:
Fannie Mae has the right to perform due diligence activities related to Eligible Advances and Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts prior to the Closing Date and at any such time thereafter (“Due Diligence”). Promptly upon Fannie Mae’s (or its agent’s) request, the Servicer is required to provide reasonable access to Servicer’s system’s and personnel, books and records whether stored in tangible or electronic form. Failure of the Servicer to provide such access will constitute a material Due Diligence issue and a Stop Event. Subject to an annual cap of $[ *** ], Servicer shall bear all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of Fannie Mae relating to a Due Diligence review of the Servicer’s activities hereunder, including without limitation third party vendor fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Servicer shall be responsible for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of Fannie Mae, including without limitation third party vendor fees, relating to Due Diligence reviews applicable to the mortgage servicing rights which Servicer acquired from Bank of America, National Association on or about January 31, 2013, and such amounts shall not be subject to the annual cap.

In the event non-material issues are discovered during the Due Diligence process, the Servicer will be notified in writing by Fannie Mae or its agent and will have a reasonable amount of time to cure such issues. However, failure to cure will constitute a material Due Diligence event.

 
 
SERVICING TRANSFER:
Unless consented to in a writing by Fannie Mae specifically referencing this EAR Agreement, no servicing of Mortgage Loans for which there exists any outstanding Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount shall be transferred to another servicer unless the Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount applicable to such Mortgage Loan is deposited into the Collections Account, or the Servicer otherwise makes a payment to Fannie Mae in an amount equal to such Periodic Early Reimbursement Amount.
 
 
FANNIE MAE SERVICING REQUIREMENTS:
Except as specifically set forth herein, entering into this EAR Agreement does not alter or diminish any obligations or duties required of the Servicer according to the MSSC and the Fannie Mae Selling and Servicing Guides, as applicable.
 
 
ASSIGNMENT:
Neither Fannie Mae nor the Servicer may assign, transfer or participate its rights under this EAR Agreement.
 
 



TERMINATION:
Fannie Mae may terminate this EAR Agreement:

(i) after the Early Reimbursement Period is completed or ended;

(ii) when the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount is zero; or

(iii) on the occurrence of a Stop Event not waived by Fannie Mae.

Any termination hereunder shall be effective on the earlier of the expiration of any applicable Recoupment Period, or the date the Aggregate Early Reimbursement Amount is zero

 
 




SCHEDULE 1




Original Advancing Servicer or Originator
SSID Number
Transfer Date

Bank of America, N.A.
261840154
261840197
261847000
261840200
261840812
April 1, 2013
May 1, 2013
June 1, 2013
September 1, 2013
December 1, 2013
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
261840111
261840120
261840138
261840146
261840804
261840855
January 31, 2013
Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation
261840103
January 1, 2013
National City Bank and National City Mortgage Services
261840057
November 1, 2009
Bank United
261840049
April 1, 2009
Hayhurst Mortgage, Inc
261840073
February 1, 2010
Option One
261840022
July 1, 2008
Franklin Bank
261840065
December 1, 2009
Green Tree Servicing LLC
261840006
N/A
Advances made by Servicer relating to Mortgage Loans in each of the above referenced acquired portfolios after the applicable Transfer Date shall be Eligible Advances.



SCHEDULE 2




Original Advancing Servicer
Legacy   Advance Type; Early Reimbursement rate

Transfer Date

Bank of America, N.A.
P&I Delinquency Advance: [ *** ]%
T&I Escrow Advances: [ *** ]%
Corporate Servicing Advances: [ *** ]%
April 1, 2013
May 1, 2013
June 1, 2013
September 1, 2013
December 1, 2013
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
P&I Delinquency Advance: [ *** ]%
T&I Escrow Advances: [ *** ]%
Corporate Servicing Advances: [ *** ]%
January 31, 2013
Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation
P&I Delinquency Advance: [ *** ]%
T&I Escrow Advances: [ *** ]%
Corporate Servicing Advances: [ *** ]%
January 1, 2013
National City Bank and National City Mortgage Services
P&I Delinquency Advance: [ *** ]%
T&I Escrow Advances: [ *** ]%
Corporate Servicing Advances: [ *** ]%
November 1, 2009





SCHEDULE 3
(Advance Request Form)




For the [Month/Day/Year] [EAR/SUB] funding, ABC Mortgage Company submitted the following files. I certify that to the best of my knowledge these advances are all either borrower recoverable or 571 claimable expenses.  Should it be determined that these advances are not recoverable or claimable, we will abide by the terms of the contract for repayment.


File Name
Number of Files Submitted
Total FNMA Advance Amount
Advance Dates From
Advance Dates To


Bank Name


Account#


Routing#
P&I Advance Detail
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corp/Escrow Advance Detail
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 








[Name]
[Title] (Must be an Officer of the company)
[Company]




SCHEDULE 4
(EAR Data Dictionary)




















Advance Solution Data Dictionary


























Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 1





Advance Solutions Data Dictionary
Table of Contents
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

SAAS
Required
Elements


Report Name


Event


Required Naming convention:
65
Corporate and Escrow Advance Detail - SRA E3 ID #1
Legacy and On-going Fundings; withdrawals from Advance Reserve Account
CorpTIAdv_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
19
Corporate and Escrow Recovery Detail - SRA E3 ID #2
Reporting Recoveries/deposits
CorpTIRecovery_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
19
P&I Advance Detail - SRA E3 ID #3
Legacy and On-going Fundings; withdrawals from Gross Service Fee Account
AdvDetail_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
19
P&I Recoveries Detail - SRA E3 ID #4
Reporting Recoveries/deposits
Recovery_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
17
P&I Loans Brought Current - SRA E3 ID #5
Reporting
LoanCurrent_Monthly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
17
Trial Balance - SRA E3 ID #6
Reporting
TrialBal_Weekly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
11
571 Claims - SRA E3 ID #7
Reporting
ClaimsFile_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
28
Daily Collections Detail - SRA E3 ID #8
Reporting
DailyCollection_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
20
Delinquency Detail - SRA E3 ID #9
Reporting
DeliDetail_Weekly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
16
Interest shortfall - SRA E3 ID #10
Reporting
IntShortfall_Monthly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
18
Loan Population / Boarding File - SRA E3 ID #11
Transfer Recon and Legacy Fundings
BoardingFile_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
12
P&I Draft Summary - SRA E3 ID #12
Reporting
DraftSummary_Weekly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
32
Remittance Detail - SRA E3 ID #13
Reporting
RemitDetail_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
8
Invoice Data - SRA E3 ID #20
Reporting
Invoice_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
9
Aged Balance Detailed Review - SRA E3 ID #14
Reporting
Aged_Balance_Report_<Servicer Name>_<Program
Type>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
293
 

*Files must be tab delimited.csv format or flat text format
*Header rows are not case sensitive


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 2


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: Corporate and Escrow Advance Detail - SRA E3 ID #1 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file Escrow: One record per transaction
File Name: CorpTIAdv_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv Corp: One record per 571 code per transaction
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec
65
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be or SUB
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Advance Date Incurred
Date servicer required advance
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
 
X
FNMA Advance Date
Date Servicer is requesting funding for advance
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
 
X
Advance Type
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-2: Advance Types
<TEXT>
Reject
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-2: Advance Types
X
FNMA Trans Code
For allowable FNMA Trans Codes please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types
<TEXT>
Reject
For allowable FNMA Trans Codes please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types
X
Servicer Trans Code
For allowable Servicer Trans Codes please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types
<TEXT>
 
For allowable Servicer Trans Codes please refer
to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account
Allowed Transaction Types
X
Servicer Advance Amount
Total amount advanced within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Transaction Amount Advanced
Servicer advance amount Itemized by 571 code
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Advance Rate
FNMA advance rate
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot exceed 100% Cannot be NULL or zero
X
FNMA Advance Amount
;
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 3


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements



Report Name: Corporate and Escrow Recovery Detail - SRA E3 ID #2 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file Escrow: One record per transaction
File Name: CorpTIRecovery_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv Corp: One record per 571 code per transaction
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

19
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be SUB
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Date Received Payment
Date servicer received payment
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
 
X
FNMA Recovery Date
Date the recovery is deposited into FNMA bank account
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Recovery Type
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-2: Advance Types
<TEXT>
Reject
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-2: Advance Types
X
FNMA Trans Code
For allowable FNM Trans Codes please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types
<TEXT>
Reject
For allowable FNM Trans Codes please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types
X
Servicer Trans Code
For allowable Servicer Trans Codes please refer to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types
<TEXT>
 
For allowable Servicer Trans Codes please refer
to SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account
Allowed Transaction Types
X
Total Recovery Amount
Total amount of recovery - total for the date
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Servicer Amount Recovered
Total amount of the transaction itemized by 571 code
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Advance Rate
FNMA advance rate
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot exceed 100% Cannot be NULL or zero
X
FNMA Amount Recovered
Amount deposited into the Corp/Escrow Recoveries Account
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 4


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements



Report Name: P&I Advance Detail - SRA E3 ID #3 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file One record per advance type
File Name: AdvDetail_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv Fundings for SSPI, G Fees, Excess Svc Fee, LPMI, PPIS
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

19
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must SUB
X
Advance Type
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to Data Dictionary
Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to Data Dictionary Legend
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Remittance type
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Advance Date
Date Servicer is requesting funding for advance
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Advance Amount
;
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Scheduled P&I Payment
Scheduled Principal and Interest less Service fee due at Remittance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
 
Interest Type
The type of interest rate structure used to amortize loan
<Fixed / ARM / NegAm, IO, Balloon, Other>
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Interest Only in Reporting
Month
Identify if loan is I/O loan; Y or N
TEXT
 
X
Current Interest Rate
The decimal equivalent of the interest rate that is presently being used on the loan to calculate monthly payments
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Loan Term
The number of months used to fully amortize the loan
<Number>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
 
GFee Advance Amount
GFee Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Excess Service Fee Advance
Amount
Excess Service Fee Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
LPMI Advance Amount
LPMI Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 5


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: P&I Recoveries Detail - SRA E3 ID #4 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file One record for each transaction posted
File Name: Recovery_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

19
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Date Payment Received
Date payment was received by servicer
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Total Payment Received
Total transaction amount posted to the loan (ties to clearing account)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Total P&I Collections
Per transaction, pays down advance (net interest)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Recovery Date
Date the recovery is deposited into FNMA bank account
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Recovery Type
For allowable Advance/Recovery Types please refer to Data Dictionary
Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable Recovery Type. See DD Legend.
X
FNMA Amount Recovered
Amount deposited into the P&I Recoveries Account
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
 
Total Gfee Collections
Total Gfee Collections
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Total Excess Service Fee
Collections
Total Excess Service Fee Collections
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
GFee Recovered
Total amount of Gfee recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Excess Service Fee Recovered

Total amount of Excess Service Fee recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Posted Date
Posted Date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
 
LPMI Recovered
LPMI Recovered
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Foreclosure Reimbursements
Foreclosure Reimbursements
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
P&I Price Adjusments
P&I Price Adjusments
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 6


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: P&I Loans Brought Current - SRA E3 ID #5 Additional Requirements: File Type: Tab delimited csv file One record per loan File Name: LoanCurrent_Monthly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

17
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB or SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Date Payment Received
Date payment was received by servicer
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
P&I Recovered
Total amount of P&I recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Principal Recovered
Total amount of principal recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Interest Recovered
Total amount of interest recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
 
Gfee Recovered
Total amount of Gfee recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Service Fee Recovered
Service Fee Recovered
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Excess Service Fee Recovered
Total amount of Excess Service Fee recovered within reporting cycle
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
LPMI Recovered
LPMI Recovered
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 7


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: Trial Balance - SRA E3 ID #6 Additional Requirements: File Type: Tab delimited csv file One record per loan File Name: TrialBal_Weekly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

17
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
P&I Advance Balance
Total outstanding P&I advance balance (net interest)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Corp Advance Balance
Total outstanding corp advance balance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Escrow Advance Balance
Total outstanding Escrow advance balance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Total Advance Balance
+
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Excess Service Fee Advance
Balance
Total Excess Service Fee Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Gfee Advance Balance
Total outstanding Gfee advance balance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Service Fee Advance Balance
Total outstanding Service Fee advance balance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 8


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: 571 Claims - SRA E3 ID #7 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file One record per claim filed
File Name: ClaimsFile_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

11
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Claim Amount
Total Amount of the claim submitted to AMN
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 9


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: Daily Collections Detail - SRA E3 ID #8 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file One record per transaction posted, reversals are negative
File Name: DailyCollection_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY> .csv *Report balances to bank activity (Clearing, P&I, T&I)
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec
28
 
SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Date Payment Received
Date payment was received by servicer
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Total Payment Received
Transaction amount posted (ties to clearing account)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Total P&I Collections
Total Principal and Net Interest Collected (ties to custodial account)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Total T&I Collections
Escrow amount posted for transaction (ties to T&I custodial account)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be NULL
 
Suspense Amount
Payment received from borrower that is short of expected payment and not applied to the loan
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be NULL
 
Late Charges
Late charges applied to loan for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be NULL
X
Gross Interest
Gross interest amount collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL; Can be zero
X
Net Interest
Current month's interest due less Servicing Fees
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Service Fee Rate
Decimal equivalent of the service fee rate based on the servicing agreement
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Service Fee Amount
GROSS Service Fee amount collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Pre-Paid Principal
Pre-paid principal collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Pre-Paid Interest
Pre-paid interest collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Pre-Paid Service Fee
Pre-paid service fee collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Paid In Full Principal
Principal applied on paid in full loan for the current reporting period
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
X
Paid In Full Interest
Interest applied on paid in full loan for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL; Can be zero
X
Curtailment
Unscheduled prin applied to reduce UPB for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL

Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 10


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


*Due Date a nd Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: Daily Collections Detail - SRA E3 ID #8 CONT'D

SAAS Required

Business Name

Description

Allowable Values
SAAS Action

Data Quality Check
 
Excess Service Fee Rate
Decimal equivalent of excess fee that servicer is charging FNMA. (Service
Fee rate -FNMA agreed Service Fee rate)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Excess Service Fee Amount
Excess Service Fee Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be Null
 
IO Strip
IO Strip
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Gfee Rate
Decimal equivalent of fee FNMA charges investor to guarantee the performance of the loans in a given pool
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Gfee Amount
Guarantee fee amount remitted or due to FNMA
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Delinquent Excess Service Fee
Excess Service Fee amount due per payment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Delinquent Gfee
Guarantee Fee amount due per payment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
LPMI Amount
Dollar amount of lender paid insurance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
LPMI Rate
Decimal percentage of portion of mortgage insurance paid by the lender
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Paid In Full Excess Service
Fee
Paid In Full Excess Service Fee collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Paid In Full Gfee
Paid In Full Gfee collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Paid In Full Service Fee
Paid In Full Service Fee collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Pre-Paid Excess Service Fee
Pre-Paid Excess Service Fee collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Pre-Paid Gfee
Pre-Paid GFee Fee collected for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Loan Repurchases
Loan Repurchases
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
X
Interest on Curtailment Adj
 
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be Null
X
Paid In Full Interest
Adjustment
 
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be Null
X
Principal
 
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
Cannot be Null


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 11


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: Delinquency Detail - SRA E3 ID #9             Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file             One record for each delinquent payment
File Name: DeliDetail_Weekly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec
20
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
 
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
 
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent P&I
Cumulative delinquent principal & interest
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Principal
Cumulative delinquent principal
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Interest
Net Interest due per payment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Service Fee
Cumulative service fee that is delinquent
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Months
Number of months of delinquent
<Number>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Interest Type
The type of interest rate structure used to amortize the loan
<Fixed / ARM / NegAm, IO, Balloon, Other>
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Interest Only in Reporting
Month
Identify if loan is I/O loan; Y or N
TEXT
 
X
Current Interest Rate
The decimal equivalent of the interest rate that is presently being used on the loan to calculate monthly payments.
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Loan Term
The number of months used to fully amortize the loan
<Number>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Excess Service Fee Rate
Decimal equivalent of excess fee that servicer is charging FNMA. (Servicer
Fee rate -FNMA agreeed Servicer Fee rate)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
IO Strip
IO Strip
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Delinquent Excess Service Fee
Excess Service Fee amount due per payment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Delinquent Gfee
Guarantee Fee Amount due per payment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Delinquent LPMI
Delinquent LPMI
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Loan Modified
Loan Modified
<TEXT>
 


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 12


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: Interest shortfall - SRA E3 ID #10                 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file                 One record per loan
File Name: IntShortfall_Monthly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec
16
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
 
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Curtailment Adjustment
Interest shortfall caused from scheduled vs. actual interest collected
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Curtailment
Unscheduled prin applied to reduce UPB for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Scheduled P&I Payment
Scheduled amount of P&I due at remit
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Scheduled Principal
Scheduled amount of principal due at remit
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Scheduled Interest
Scheduled amount of interest due at remit
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Interest Type
The type of interest rate structure used to amortize the loan
<Fixed / ARM / NegAm, IO, Balloon, Other>
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Current Interest Rate
The decimal equivalent of the interest rate that is presently being used on the loan to calculate monthly payments
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
 
PPIS
Pre-Paid Interest Shortfall
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject
 
Payoff Effective Date
Payoff Effective Date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 



Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 13


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: Loan Population / Boarding File - SRA E3 ID #11         Additional Requirements
File Type: Tab delimited csv file             One record per loan
File Name: BoardingFile_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec
18
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Principal
Cumulative delinquent principal at transfer
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Interest
Interest due on loan at transfer
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Delinquent Service Fee
Cumulative service fee that is delinquent at transfer
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
P&I Advance Balance
Legacy P&I advance balance at transfer
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Corp Advance Balance
Legacy Corp advance balance at transfer
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Escrow Advance Balance
Legacy Escrow advance balance at transfer
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Total Advance Balance
+
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Gfee Rate
Decimal equivalent of fee FNMA charges investor to guarantee the performance of the loans in a given pool
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
LPMI Rate
Decimal percentage of portion of mortgage insurance paid by the lender
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Excess Service Fee Rate
Decimal equivalent of excess fee that servicer is charging FNMA. (Servicer
Fee rate -FNMA agreeed Servicer Fee rate)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Transfer Date
Date Loan was Transferred from Legacy Servicer to New Servicer
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
Cannot be NULL



Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 14


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: P&I Draft Summary - SRA E3 ID #12
File Type: Tab delimited csv file
File Name: DraftSummary_Weekly_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec
12
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be Must be SUB
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Draft Date
Date FNMA drafts remittance amount
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Reclass DLRS Credits
Reclass DLRS Credits
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
MBS P&I Draft Amount
Total MBS Draft Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
MRS P&I Draft Amount
Total MRS Draft Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
MBS P&I Advance Amount
Total MBS Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
MRS P&I Advance Amount
Total MRS Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
MBS Trust Acct Balance
Total MBS Collections
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
MRS Trust Acct Balance
Total MRS Collections
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Excess Service Fee Advance
Amount
Total Excess Service Fee Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Excess Service Fee
Collections
Total Excess Service Fee Collections
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Excess Service Fee Draft
Amount
Total Excess Service Fee Draft Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Excess Service Fee Pool/Loan
Level Variance
Variance between loan level remittance detail and draft total (<1%)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Gfee Advance Amount
Total Gfee Advance Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Gfee Collections
Total Gfee Collections
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Gfee Draft Amount
Total Gfee Draft Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
Gfee Pool/Loan Level Variance
Variance between loan level remittance detail and draft total (<1%)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
MRS Pool/Loan Level Variance
Variance between loan level remittance detail and draft total (<1%)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
MBS Pool/Loan Level Variance
Variance between loan level remittance detail and draft total (<1%)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 



Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 15


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: Remittance Detail - SRA E3 ID #13 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file                     One record per loan as of FNMA reporting cycle cut off
File Name: RemitDetail_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 16


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

32
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Master Servicer Number
9 digit Master Servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Previous Servicer Number
Legacy servicer's FNMA seller/servicer ID
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be nine digits; Cannot be NULL
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be SUB
X
FNMA Status Code
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
 
Branch ID
FNMA Branch ID identifier
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Investor Number
Number used to associate pool of loans with an investor
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Effective Date
As of date - indicating when data was generated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
 
 
X
FNMA Remittance Type
Servicer Principal and Interest Remittance Schedule based on the Servicing
Agreement
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable FNMA Remiitance Type. See
DD Legend
X
FNMA Remittance Amount
Loan level amount remitted to FNMA
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Beginning UPB
UPB prior to transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Current UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Next Payment Due Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Last Paid Installment Date
Date last installment was paid through
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
P&I Constant
Monthly Principal and Gross Interest Due
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Principal
Principal remitted or due
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL; Can be zero
X
Net Interest
Current month's interest due less Servicing Fees
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Service Fee Rate
Decimal equivalent of the service fee rate based on the servicing agreement
<Number as Decimal> <#####.#####>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Service Fee Amount
Amount due to Servicer as fee based on servicing agreement
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Gfee Rate
Decimal equivalent of fee FNMA charges investor to guarantee the performance of the loans in a given pool
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Gfee Amount
Guarantee fee amount remitted or due to fnma
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
X
LPMI
Decimal percentage of portion of mortgage insurance paid by the lender
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Interest on Curtailment Adj
Adjustment applied to curtailment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Paid In Full Principal
Principal applied on paid in full loan for the current reporting period
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL; Can be zero
X
Paid In Full Interest
Paid in full interest remitted or due
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL; Can be zero
X
Paid In Full Interest
Adjustment
Shortage in expected interest due to loan being paid in full
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL; Can be zero

Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 17


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: Remittance Detail - SRA E3 ID #13 CONT'D


SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Curtailment
Unscheduled principal applied to reduce UPB for transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Remittance Date
Date Servicer remits funds to FNMA
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Current Scheduled UPB
Scheduled UPB after transaction
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Scheduled P&I Payment
Scheduled amount of P&I due at remit
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
 
Interest Type
The type of interest rate structure used to amortize the loan
<Fixed / ARM / NegAm, IO, Balloon, Other>
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Interest Only in Reporting
Month
Identify if loan is I/O loan; Y or N
TEXT
 
X
Current Interest Rate
The decimal equivalent of the interest rate that is presently being used on the loan to calculate monthly payments.
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL or zero
X
Loan Term
The number of months used to fully amortize the loan
<Number>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Excess Service Fee Rate
Decimal equivalent of excess fee that servicer is charging FNMA. (Servicer
Fee rate -FNMA agreeed Servicer Fee rate)
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Excess Service Fee Amount
Excess Service Fee Amount
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
IO Strip
IO Strip
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
 
FNMA Status Code Effective
Date
FNMA Status Code Effective Date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 18


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements



Report Name: Invoice Data - SRA E3 ID #20              Additional Raquirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file          One record per loan
File Name: Invoice_Daily_<Servicer Name>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

9
LOAN LEVEL INVOICE FILE

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Program Type
Must be SUB
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable Program type SUB
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
 
Must be 9 digits
Cannot be NULL
 
Servicer Loan Number
Loan number assigned by servicer
<TEXT>
Veri
If FNMA loan Number not NULL then validate servicer loan number against ADW.If no match then Veri
If FNMA loan number is Null, then no DQ check
X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in the transfer population
X
FNMA Invoice Type
Must be allowable Invoice Type. Only 1 Invoice Type per file. See Invoice
Type Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be one Invoice Type per file. Must be allowable Invoice Type. See Invoice Type Legend.
X
Servicer Invoice Number
Servicer assigned unique number. Only 1 Invoice Number per file.
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be one invoice # per file
 
Borrower Next Payment Due
Date
Borrower's scheduled next due date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Borrower LPI Date
Borrower's Last Paid Installment date
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
 
X
Servicer Expense Incurred
Date
Date that the Servicer incurred the expense
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Servicer Expense
Reimbursement Request Date
Date Servicer is requesting reimbursement for expense. Only 1
Reimbursement Request Date per file.
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
Cannot be multiple dates per file
X
FNMA Expense Code
Must be allowable FNMA Expense Code. See Expense Code Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be allowable Expense
Code. See Expense Code Legend.
 
Servicer Transaction Code
Servicer code assigned to identify transaction
<TEXT>
 
 
X
Servicer Transaction Expense
Amount
Servicer expense amount Itemized by FNMA Expense Code
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Servicer Transaction
Requested Amount
Servicer requested expense amount itemized by FNMA Expense Code
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Servicer Transaction Check
Number
Servicer check number used to disburse transactions
<TEXT>
 
 


X


Servicer Data file Type
Type of data contained in invoice file. Allowable values are 'L' for Loan
Level or 'S' for Non-Loan Level


<TEXT>


Reject
Cannot be NULL
Value must be 'L' or 'S'
Cannot be multiple values per file
 
Servicer Notes
Servicer comments
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 19


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements


Report Name: Invoice Data - SRA E3 ID #20 CONT'D
8
NON-LOAN LEVELINVOICE FILE

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check
X
Program Type
INV
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be allowable Program type (INV)
X
Sub-servicer Number
9 digit Sub-servicer number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be 9 digits
Cannot be NULL
X
FNMA Invoice Type
Must be allowable Invoice Type. Only 1 Invoice Type per file. See Invoice
Type Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be one Invoice Type per file. Must be allowable Invoice Type. See Invoice Type Legend.
X
Servicer Invoice Number
Servicer assigned unique number. Only 1 Invoice Number per file.
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be one invoice # per file
X
Servicer Expense Incurred
Date
Date that the Servicer incurred the expense
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
X
Servicer Expense
Reimbursement Request Date
Date Servicer is requesting reimbursement for expense. Only 1
Reimbursement Request Date per file.
<MM/DD/YYYY>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
Cannot be multiple dates per file
X
FNMA Expense Code
Must be allowable FNMA Expense Code. See Expense Code Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be allowable Expense
Code. See Expense Code Legend.
 
Servicer Transaction Code
Servicer code assigned to identify transaction
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Servicer Transaction Expense
Amount
Servicer expense amount Itemized by FNMA Expense Code
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL
 
Servicer Transaction
Requested Amount
Servicer requested expense amount itemized by FNMA Expense Code
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
Servicer Transaction Check
Number
Servicer check number used to disburse transactions
<TEXT>
 


X


Servicer Data file Type
Type of data contained in invoice file. Allowable values are 'L' for Loan
Level or 'S' for Non-Loan Level


<TEXT>


Reject
Cannot be NULL
Value must be 'L' or 'S'
Cannot be multiple values per file
 
Servicer Notes
Servicer comments
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 20


Advance Solution Data Dictionary
*Due Date and Frequency are defined in the Third Amended and Restated Strategic Relationship Agreement, SCHEDULE E3 Advance Solution Reporting and Certification Requirements

Report Name: Aged Balance Detailed Review - SRA E3 ID #14                 Additional Requirements:
File Type: Tab delimited csv file                     One record per loan
File Name: Aged_Balance_Report_<Servicer Name>_<Program Type>_<MMDDYYYY>.csv
*All variances to the Data Dictionary must be approved by the Fannie Mae Relationship Exec

9
 

SAAS Required

Business Name

Business Description

SAAS Allowable Values
SAAS Action

SAAS Data Quality Check

X
FNMA Loan Number
Unique 10 digit loan number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Reject
Must be valid FNMA loan number and must be in
the transfer population
 
Seller Servicer Number
9 digit Seller Servicer Number assigned by FNMA
<TEXT>
Veri
Must be 9 digits
Cannot be NULL
 
Portfolio
Seller Servicer Name associated with Seller Servicer Number
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
X
Loan Status
Must be FNMA Status Code. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Veri
Cannot be NULL
 
Liquidation Date
Date the loan liquidated
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process
 
REO Disposition Date
Date the REO disposition occurred
<MM/DD/YYYY>
 
X
Property State
State the property is located within
<TEXT>
Veri
Cannot be NULL.


X
Aging Category
Must be allowable Aging Category. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be allowable Aging
Category. See Aging Description Legend.
X
Aged Balance Amount
Amount that is considered Aged and due for repayment
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL

X
Trial Balance Amount
Amount that is currently the total Trial Balance
<Number as Decimal> <#########.##>
Reject
Cannot be NULL

X
Category
Must be allowable Category. See DD Legend
<TEXT>
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be allowable Category. See Aging Description Legend.


X


Reason Description


Must be allowabe Reason Description. See DD Legend


<TEXT>


Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be allowable Reason
Description. See Reason Description Legend.


X


Reason Code


Must be allowable Reason Code. See DD Legend
 
Reject
Cannot be NULL. Must be allowable Reason
Code. See Reason Description Legend.
 
Comments
Servicer comments
<TEXT>
 
This data element is not required by SAAS but
can be populated without causing the file to reject the SAAS import process


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 21


Advance Solution Data Dictionary


Data Dictionary Legend - SAAS Allowable Values

FNMA Status Codes
Code
Description
0
Current/Active/Standard Default
0
Current/Active/Standard Default
12
Relief provisions
15
Bankruptcy/litigation
20
Referred for deed-in-lieu or assignment
30
Referred for foreclosure
59
Out of Portfolio (OOPs) repurchases
60
Liquidated - Payoff
65
Liquidated - Repurchase
66
Liquidated - MBS substitution
70
Liquidated - Held for sale
71
Liquidated - 3rd party sale/condemnation
72
Liquidated - Pending conveyance
74
Assigned to Federal Housing Administration (FHA)/ Veterans Administration (VA)
80
Liquidated - Sold to Private Label Security
90
Loan liquidated in error and read to book of business source system. Not representing an actual loan liquidation.
91
Dissolution. Loan erroneously entered on source system and required to be liquidated to remove from source systems.
99
Other/error
 
 
Corp/Escrow Advance/Recovery Types are defined in SRA Exhibit C10-2: Advance Types
 
 
Corp/Escrow FNM Trans Codes are defined in SRA Exhibit C10-1: Advance Reserve Account Allowed Transaction Types







Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 21


Advance Solution Data Dictionary



Data Dictionary Legend - SAAS Allowable Values

Other Advance & Recovery Types (loan-level data)
Code
Report Type
Description
ADMIN
Other
Intentifies Admin Fees paid by Sub-servicer
AGED
Other
Identifies Aged Advance Balances paid by Sub-servicer
INCT
Other
Incentive
INV
Other
Invoice
REF
Other
Refund
DELMOD
PI
Delinquent modifications
DLRS
PI
Delinquent Loan Reclass - MBS
ESFEE
PI
Excess Service Fee transactions
ESFEES
PI
Excess Service Fee interest shortfall
FBO
PI
Foreclosure buy out
GFEE
PI
GFEE transactions
GFEES
PI
GFEE interest shortfall
LEGP
PI
Legacy Servicer P&I Advances
LPMI
PI
LPMI transactions
PPIS
PI
Prepaid Interest Shortfall
SCRA
PI
Soldiers and Sailors Buydown expenses
SSPI
PI
Description to be utilized on the SUB P&I Advance Detail Reports

 
FNMA Remittance Type
Code
Description
AA
Actual/Actual
SS
Scheduled/Scheduled
SA
Scheduled/Actual
MBS
Mortgage Backed Security
MRS
Mortgage Remittance System
RPM
Rapid Payment Method
EXP
Express

Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 22


Advance Solution Data Dictionary


Data Dictionary Legend - SAAS Allowable Values

FNMA Invoice Expense Codes
FNMA Expense Code
Expense Name
Invoice Type
101
Loan boarding Fee
Self-Pay (Sub-Servicing Fees)
102
Subservicing Fees - Current Loans
Self-Pay (Sub-Servicing Fees)
103
Subservicing Fees - 30 to 59 days past due
Self-Pay (Sub-Servicing Fees)
120
Subservicing Fees – 60-539 days past due
Self-Pay (Sub-Servicing Fees)
125
Subservicing Fees – 540+ days past due
Self-Pay (Sub-Servicing Fees)
202
Interest on Escrow
Self-Pay
203
Interest on Hazard Insurance
Self-Pay
309
HARP Operational Expenses
Self-Pay
339
HAMP-Like Incentives
Self-Pay
340
Prior Servicer Claimable Expense – Not Collectible
Self-Pay
350
Terminated Lenders – Not Collectible
Self-Pay
360
Prior Servicer Claimed Expense - Collectible
Self-Pay
400
Incentive Compensation
Incentive Compensation



FNM Invoice Types
Invoice Type
Frequency
Self-Pay (Sub-Servicing Fees)
Monthly
Self-Pay
Monthly
Incentive Compensation
Quarterly


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 23


Advance Solution Data Dictionary

Data Dictionary Legend - SAAS Allowable Values

Aged Advances Reason Codes
Reason Code
Reason Description
Definition

1000

1000 - Claim in Submitted Status
Servicer has submitted the claim but the claim is still in submitted or acknowledged status.
2000
2000 - Supplemental Claim in Submitted Status
The initial claim was rejected or curtailed and the servicer has re-submitted .

3000

3000 - Servicer Expense
The servicer acknowledges this as a servicer expense and should be taking immediate action to repay Fannie Mae through recovery process.




4000




4000 - Pending NSO Review
No action can be taken to close the balance due to an issue that requires attention of Fannie Mae to resolve. (Examples of this include but are not limited to loans that may have issues with the cases in HSSN or where certain transaction are awaiting a decision.) These should be documented and reported to Fannie Mae Servicing Management for resolution.


5000


5000 - Legacy Servicer Expense
The aged advance is due to a prior servicer balance that transferred or an expense that was incurred due to servicing error. These items should be identified with the proper transaction code.

6000

6000 - Approved Aged Balance

Servicer has been granted a waiver or extension in writing by the NSO at Fannie Mae.


7000


7000 - Fannie Mae Expense

This aged advance has been identified as an item that should paid through the invoice billing process at Fannie Mae and should be paid back as a recovery by the servicer.

8000

8000 - Redemption Period Pending
Loan is in redemption state and servicer cannot file claim until the redemption period has expired.


9000


9000 - Approved Claim Pending Posting
The submitted claim that will close the aged balance has been approved or paid but the servicer has not had the ability to post the paid transactions to their system and therefore has not been able to record the recovery.

10000

10000 - Active Loan Status
The aged balance is for a loan that has been reactivated or the servicer is showing the loan in active status.

11000

11000 - Zero Aged Balance Loan
The servicer is not showing aged advances on their side and is disputing the amount.
All items will be reviewed.


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 24


Advance Solution Data Dictionary


Data Dictionary Legend - SAAS Aged Balance Categories

Aging Description
Aging Category
Category
Period
AA Loan <=90 Days
AA Balances
<=90
AA Loan 1 Year
AA Balances
1 year
AA Loan 151-180 Days
AA Balances
151-180
AA Loan 181-365 Days
AA Balances
181-365
AA Loan 2 Years
AA Balances
2 years
AA Loan 3 Years
AA Balances
3 years
AA Loan 91-150 Days
AA Balances
91-150
AA Loan 31-60 Days
AA Balances
31-60
AA Loan 61-90 Days
AA Balances
61-90
AA Loan <=30 Days
AA Balances
<=30
Liq 30 Days
Liquidated Balances
30
Liq 31-60 Days
Liquidated Balances
31-60
Liq 61-90 Days
Liquidated Balances
61-90
Liq 91-120 Days
Liquidated Balances
91-120
Liq 121-150 Days
Liquidated Balances
121-150
Liq 151-180 Days
Liquidated Balances
151-180
Liq 181-365 Days
Liquidated Balances
181-365
Liq 1 Year
Liquidated Balances
1 year
Liq 2 Years
Liquidated Balances
2 years
Liq 3 Years
Liquidated Balances
3 years
QC - Liq 61-90 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
61-90
QC - Liq 30 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
30
QC - Liq 3 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
3 years
QC - Liq 2 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
2 years
QC - Liq 181-365 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
181-365
QC - AA Loan <=90 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
<=90
QC - Liq 121-150 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
121-150
QC - Liq 91-120 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
91-120
QC - AA Loan 91-150 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
91-150
QC - AA Loan 3 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
3 years
QC - AA Loan 2 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
2 years
QC - AA Loan 181-365 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
181-365
QC - AA Loan 151-180 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
151-180
QC - Liq/REO 30 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
30
QC - AA Loan 1 Year
QC Repurchase Balances
1 year
QC - Liq 151-180 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
151-180
QC - Liq 1 Year
QC Repurchase Balances
1 year
QC - Liq/REO 61-90 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
61-90


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 25


Advance Solution Data Dictionary


Data Dictionary Legend - SAAS Aged Balance Categories

Aging Description
Aging Category
Category
Period
QC - Zero UPB 3 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
3 years
QC - Zero UPB 2 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
2 years
QC - Zero UPB 181-365 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
181-365
QC - Zero UPB 151-180 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
151-180
QC - Zero UPB 1 Year
QC Repurchase Balances
1 year
QC - Zero UPB <=90 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
<=90
QC - Liq/REO 91-120 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
91-120
QC - Liq/REO 1 Year
QC Repurchase Balances
1 year
QC - Liq/REO 31-60 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
31-60
QC - Zero UPB 91-150 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
91-150
QC - Liq/REO 3 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
3 years
QC - Liq/REO 2 Years
QC Repurchase Balances
2 years
QC - Liq/REO 181-365 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
181-365
QC - Liq/REO 151-180 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
151-180
QC - Liq/REO 121-150 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
121-150
QC - Liq 31-60 Days
QC Repurchase Balances
31-60
Liq/REO 181-365 Days
REO Balances
181-365
Liq/REO 31-60 Days
REO Balances
31-60
Liq/REO 61-90 Days
REO Balances
61-90
Liq/REO 91-120 Days
REO Balances
91-120
Liq/REO 121-150 Days
REO Balances
121-150
Liq/REO 151-180 Days
REO Balances
151-180
Liq/REO 30 Days
REO Balances
30
Liq/REO 1 Year
REO Balances
1 year
Liq/REO 3 Years
REO Balances
3 years
Liq/REO 2 Years
REO Balances
2 years
Zero UPB 121-150 Days
Zero UPB Balances
121-150
Zero UPB 31-60 Days
Zero UPB Balances
31-60
Zero UPB 61-90 Days
Zero UPB Balances
61-90
Zero UPB 91-120 Days
Zero UPB Balances
91-120
Zero UPB 1 Year
Zero UPB Balances
1 year
Zero UPB 3 Years
Zero UPB Balances
3 years
Zero UPB 181-365 Days
Zero UPB Balances
181-365
Zero UPB 2 Years
Zero UPB Balances
2 years
Zero UPB 151-180 Days
Zero UPB Balances
151-180
Zero UPB 91-150 Days
Zero UPB Balances
91-150
Zero UPB <=90 Days
Zero UPB Balances
<=90


Confidential Fannie Mae Document, Please Obtain Approval for Distributing
The purpose of the Data Dictionary is to define the reporting templates and not the eligible Advance and/or invoicing criteria 26


Advance Solutions Data Dictionary



Subservicing Summary
Servicer:
IBM ‐ Seterus
3039 Cornwallis Road
Research Triangle Park, NC. 27709
Invoice To:
Fannie Mae
14221 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, TX 75254
Customer 7324875 Contract LBAAAAF
Servicer Contact:
Lisa Muttoni
Financial Analyst
Phone: 720‐396‐7471
Email: lisa.j.muttoni@us.ibm.com
Fannie Mae Contact:
John Shively
972‐656‐2986
Invoice Submitted To:
special_assets_invoicing@fanniemae.com
 
CC:
john_shively@fanniemae.com

Invoice Date: MM/DD/YYYY
Invoice Number: XXX
Services Period: MM,YYYY
PO # N/A
Payment Terms XXX

 
 
EXPENSE AMOUNT
FEES
   SUB‐SERVICING FEES
 
 
See Data Dictionary
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ ‐
 
Sub‐Total
$ ‐
REIMBURSEMENTS
SELF‐PAY FEES
 
 
See Data Dictionary
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ ‐
$ ‐
 
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
$ ‐
 
See Data Dictionary
$ ‐
 
 
 
TOTAL DUE Servicer / (FNMA) (Non‐Taxable Charges)
$ ‐

I certify that to the best of my knowledge these expenses are all eligible under the sub‐servicing agreement (SRA) and are accurate in their amounts. Should it be determined that these expenses are not eligible under the agreement, we will abide by the terms of the contract for repayment.

Approver (Vice President) Date     

WIRING INSTRUCTIONS


Bank Name: Account Name:
ABA/Routing Number (Wire): ABA/Routing Number (ACH): Account Number:


*The purpose of this document is to define the data reporting requirements and does not represent the eligible advance and/or eligible invoice criteria.






EXHIBIT 10.3
EXECUTION COPY

GUARANTY

THIS GUARANTY (this “ Guaranty ”) is made as of March 17, 2014 by WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. , a Maryland Corporation (“ Guarantor ”), for the benefit of FANNIE MAE , a corporation chartered under the laws of the United States (“ Fannie Mae ”).

BACKGROUND

A.    Green Tree Servicing LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ Subsidiary ”) has entered into a Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract with Fannie Mae (as amended from time to time, “ Subsidiary’s MSSC ”), effective as of March 23, 2005, as subsequently amended by the related Addendum dated as of April 4, 2012 establishing Subsidiary as an approved seller and servicer of mortgage loans and participation interests and providing the terms and conditions of the sale to and servicing of mortgage loans for, Fannie Mae.
    
B.    Guarantor indirectly owns 100% of the membership interests of Subsidiary, and as such, Guarantor will receive a direct and material economic benefit from Subsidiary’s MSSC and the transactions contemplated thereby.

C.    Subsidiary is party to and bound by various agreements with Fannie Mae, including, without limitation, the MSSC and the Fannie Mae Selling and Servicing Guides (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “ Selling Guide ” and the “ Servicing Guide ”; together, the “ Guides, ” which term shall include anything that, in whole or in part, supersedes or is substituted for the Guides; the MSSC, the Guides and all other agreements with Fannie Mae to which the Subsidiary is a party or bound by now or hereafter in effect are referred to herein as the “ Fannie Mae Contracts ”);

D.    Citimortgage, Inc. and Everbank have requested approval from Fannie Mae to transfer the servicing of certain loans to the Subsidiary and it is a condition to Fannie Mae’s consent to those servicing transfers that Guarantor enter into this Agreement; and

NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Guarantor agrees as follows:


1. Unconditional Guaranty of Performance and Payment .

(a) Guarantor unconditionally, irrevocably and absolutely guarantees to Fannie Mae, as primary obligor and not merely as a surety, the prompt performance and punctual payment (whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise) of all Servicing Obligations (as hereinafter defined) required to be performed or paid by Subsidiary under Subsidiary’s Fannie Mae Contracts relating to any mortgage loans or participation interests that Subsidiary services or has serviced for, or on behalf of, Fannie Mae, including, without limitation, interest, fees, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) accruing on such obligations after the commencement, whether voluntary or involuntary, of a bankruptcy, reorganization, liquidation or other similar federal or state law proceeding by or against Subsidiary, without regard to whether or not such interest, fees, penalties, fines, costs and expenses are allowed claims in such proceeding (collectively, “ Subsidiary’s Obligations ”). “ Servicing Obligations ” include all servicing responsibilities, obligations, covenants, representations and warranties made or assumed with respect to any loan Subsidiary has serviced or is servicing on behalf of Fannie Mae, including, but not limited to, requirements relating to day-to-day loan administration activities, reporting and remitting, and foreclosure and loss mitigation activities. This Guaranty is a continuing guarantee of the performance and payment of Subsidiary’s Obligations. For the avoidance of doubt, “Servicing Obligations” shall not include Subsidiary’s obligations relating to the selling representations and warranties made or assumed by Subsidiary in connection with the sale and/or securitization of mortgage loans to and/or by Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae Contracts; however, “Servicing Obligations” shall include selling representation and warranties Subsidiary has assumed, or may, subsequent to the execution of this Guaranty, have assumed in connection with Subsidiary’s purchase of servicing rights related to mortgage loans owned, guaranteed or securitized by Fannie Mae. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, as part of Guarantor’s guarantee of the performance of Subsidiary’s Obligations, Guarantor shall take all actions required to ensure that Subsidiary is in compliance at all times with all requirements under Fannie Mae Contracts relating to Subsidiary’s capital, net worth, liquidity, and all other eligibility requirements set forth in the Fannie Mae Contracts.

(b) This is a guaranty of performance and payment and not of collection. Guarantor shall discharge forthwith on written demand by Fannie Mae, and at no cost to Fannie Mae, all of Subsidiary’s Obligations, whenever arising. Fannie Mae, in its sole discretion, may make demand under this Guaranty, at one or more times and from time to time, of all or any part of the obligations of Guarantor hereunder.

(c)    Guarantor agrees to promptly pay to Fannie Mae all costs and out-of-pocket expenses, including, without limitation, court costs and expenses and the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel, incurred by or on behalf of Fannie Mae arising from or in connection with the negotiation and execution of this Guaranty, any enforcement of Guarantor’s obligations under this Guaranty or the protection, assertion or enforcement of Fannie Mae’s rights or remedies under this Guaranty or the Fannie Mae Contract. The agreement contained in this Section 1(c) shall survive the termination of this Guaranty.

(d)    Guarantor agrees to indemnify Fannie Mae and hold Fannie Mae harmless from and against all losses, damages, judgments, claims, legal actions, and legal fees that are based on, or result from, the Subsidiary’s failure or alleged failure to satisfy its Servicing Obligations for mortgage loans or MBS pools it services for Fannie Mae under the provisions of the Fannie Mae Contract. The agreement contained in this Section 1(d) shall survive the termination of this Guaranty.

(e) All payments to be made hereunder by Guarantor shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America at the time of payment, shall be made in immediately available funds, and shall be made without any deduction (whether for taxes or otherwise) or offset whatsoever.

2. Primary Guaranty . The obligations of Guarantor hereunder shall be promptly performed and paid without demand on Subsidiary and shall be unaffected by (a) the genuineness, validity, regularity, enforceability or any future amendment of, or change in, this Guaranty, the Fannie Mae Contract or any other agreement, document or instrument to which Guarantor and/or Subsidiary is or may become a party, (b) the insolvency or financial condition of Guarantor and/or Subsidiary, (c) the existence, value or condition of, or failure to perfect any security interest or lien against, any collateral for Subsidiary’s Obligations or any action, or the absence of any action, by Fannie Mae in respect thereof (including, without limitation, the release of any such security interest or lien), (d) any act or omission that, but for this Section 2, could or might act as a release, discharge or modification of the obligations of Guarantor hereunder, or (e) any other action or circumstance that might otherwise constitute a legal or equitable discharge or defense of a surety or a guarantor.

3. Waivers and Acknowledgements by Guarantor .

(a)      Guarantor hereby waives the benefit of all principles or provisions of law, statutory or otherwise, which are or might be in conflict with the terms of this Guaranty.

(b)    Without limiting the generality of Section 2 or Section 3(a) above, Guarantor hereby waives, to the extent permitted by applicable law:

(i) diligence, presentment, demand of payment, protest and all notices (whether for non-payment, protest, acceptance, maturity, acceleration, extension of time, change in nature or form of Subsidiary’s Obligations, acceptance of further security, release of security, composition or agreement arrived at as to the amount of, or the terms of, any of Subsidiary’s Obligations, notice of adverse change in Subsidiary’s financial condition or any other fact, circumstance or action, whether or not it might increase the risk to Guarantor, or otherwise);

(ii) any defense of the statute of limitations (which is six (6) years in duration or shorter) in any action against Guarantor under this Guaranty;

(iii) notice of acceptance of this Guaranty and of the incurring by Guarantor of any of its obligations hereunder;

(iv) all demands whatsoever; and

(v) all rights and remedies to require Fannie Mae to:

(1) proceed against Subsidiary (or any other person or entity);

(2) proceed against or exhaust any collateral held by Fannie Mae to secure the performance or payment of any of Subsidiary’s Obligations; or

(3) pursue any other remedy, whether at law or in equity, it may now or hereafter have against Subsidiary (or any other person or entity), including, but not limited to, any rights to an “election of remedies” or marshalling of assets.

4. Reinstatement. If for any reason at any time performance and/or payment of Subsidiary’s Obligations, or any part thereof, is, pursuant to applicable law, rescinded or reduced in amount, or must otherwise be restored or returned by Fannie Mae, whether as a “voidable preference”, “fraudulent conveyance”, or otherwise, then (i) such amounts shall not constitute a release of liability of Guarantor hereunder and Guarantor agrees to promptly perform and/or pay such obligations to Fannie Mae on demand, and (ii) any prior release or discharge from the terms of this Guaranty given to Guarantor by Fannie Mae shall be without effect, and this Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect.

5. [Reserved]

6. Subrogation . Until all of Subsidiary’s Obligations have been indefeasibly performed and/or paid in full in cash to Fannie Mae and this Guaranty has been terminated as provided hereinafter, Guarantor expressly and irrevocably waives any and all rights at law or in equity to subrogation, reimbursement, exoneration, contribution, indemnification or set off or to any other rights that could accrue to a surety against a principal, to a guarantor against a principal, to a guarantor against a maker or obligor, to an accommodation party against the party accommodated, to a holder or transferee against a maker, or to the holder of any claim against any person or entity, that Guarantor may have or hereafter acquire against Subsidiary.

7. Representations and Warranties.

(a) Guarantor hereby represents and warrants the following to Fannie Mae, each and all of which shall survive the execution and delivery of this Guaranty:

(i) This Guaranty has been duly authorized, executed and delivered, and is a valid and legally binding agreement, enforceable against Guarantor in accordance with its terms. The execution, delivery and performance of this Guaranty does not and will not (1) violate (a) any provision of any law or regulation, (b) any order of any court or governmental agency, (c) any agreement of any kind to which Guarantor is a party, or by which Guarantor is bound, or (d) Guarantor’s charter or by-laws, the breach or violation of which would affect or limit Guarantor’s performance under or compliance with any terms of this Guaranty; (2) conflict with or result in the breach of, or constitute a default under, or accelerate or permit the acceleration of any performance required by, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, lease, agreement or other instrument to which Guarantor is a party or by which Guarantor or any of its property is bound; and/or (3) result in the creation or imposition of any security interest or lien upon any of the property or assets of Guarantor;

(ii) Each consent, approval or authorization of any kind required to be obtained by Guarantor in connection with the execution and delivery of this Guaranty or the performance of its obligations hereunder has been duly obtained and is in full force and effect;

(iii) There are no investigations, actions, suits or proceedings pending, or to the knowledge of Guarantor (following due and diligent inquiry) threatened against Guarantor, in any court or before any federal, state, municipal or other governmental department or commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, or before any arbitrator or other tribunal that, if adversely determined, will materially and adversely affect Guarantor’s business or financial condition or results of operations or the validity and enforceability of this Guaranty or Guarantor’s ability to perform its obligations hereunder;

(iv) The execution of this Guaranty has been (1) specifically approved by the Board of Directors of Guarantor and such approval is reflected in the minutes of the meetings of such Board of Directors, or (2) approved by an officer of Guarantor who was duly authorized by the Board of Directors to enter into transactions of the type set forth in this Guaranty and such authorization is reflected in the minutes of the Board of Directors’ meetings. This Guaranty constitutes the “written agreement” of Guarantor and Guarantor shall continuously maintain all components of such “written agreement” as an official record of Guarantor or of any successor thereto; and

(v) Guarantor’s obligations hereunder are not subject to any offsets or defenses.

Guarantor shall deliver to Fannie Mae an executed opinion of counsel in the form attached hereto as Addendum “A” contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Guaranty.

8. Notices . Any demand, notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally or by recognized overnight national courier service or if sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, first class postage prepaid, addressed to the applicable party at the address for notices set forth in this Section 8. Any demand, notice or other communication so given shall be deemed to have been received at the time the notice is delivered to such address.

Guarantor:    Walter Investment Management Corp.
3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 1100
Tampa, FL 33607
Fax: 213-281-5635
Attention: General Counsel

Fannie Mae:    Fannie Mae
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20016
Attention: Vice President, Single Family Operations

With a copy to:    Fannie Mae
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20016
Attention: General Counsel
        

9. GOVERNING LAW; CONSENT TO JURISDICTION AND VENUE . THE VALIDITY OF THIS GUARANTY, ITS CONSTRUCTION, INTERPRETATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, AND THE RIGHTS OF GUARANTOR AND FANNIE MAE, SHALL BE DETERMINED UNDER, GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO NEW YORK’S PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW THAT WOULD RESULT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. GUARANTOR HEREBY AGREES THAT ALL ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH THIS GUARANTY SHALL BE TRIED AND DETERMINED ONLY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, OR, AT THE SOLE OPTION OF FANNIE MAE, IN ANY OTHER COURT IN WHICH FANNIE MAE SHALL INITIATE LEGAL OR EQUITABLE PROCEEDINGS AND WHICH HAS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE MATTER IN CONTROVERSY. GUARANTOR HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO ASSERT THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS OR TO OBJECT TO VENUE TO THE EXTENT ANY PROCEEDING IS BROUGHT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION.

10. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL . GUARANTOR HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY ACTION, CAUSE OF ACTION, CLAIM, DEMAND, OR PROCEEDING ARISING UNDER OR WITH RESPECT TO THIS GUARANTY, OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH, RELATED TO, OR INCIDENTAL TO THE DEALINGS OF GUARANTOR AND FANNIE MAE WITH RESPECT TO THIS GUARANTY, OR THE TRANSACTIONS RELATED HERETO, IN EACH CASE WHETHER NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ARISING, AND WHETHER SOUNDING IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE. GUARANTOR HEREBY AGREES THAT ANY SUCH ACTION, CAUSE OF ACTION, CLAIM, DEMAND, OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE DECIDED BY A COURT TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY AND THAT FANNIE MAE MAY FILE A COPY OF THIS SECTION 10 WITH ANY COURT OR OTHER TRIBUNAL AS WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE CONSENT OF GUARANTOR TO THE WAIVER OF ITS RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.

11. Further Assurances. Guarantor agrees, at any time and from time to time, upon written request by Fannie Mae to promptly take, or cause to be taken, any action and to execute and deliver any additional documents that, in the sole discretion of Fannie Mae, may be necessary in order to assure to Fannie Mae the full benefits of this Guaranty, in each case at the sole cost and expense of Guarantor.

12. Amendments; Termination; Delays; Rights Cumulative; Termination. Neither this Guaranty nor any term or provision hereof may be modified, amended, changed, waived or discharged, except by an instrument in writing signed by Fannie Mae and Guarantor expressly referring to this Guaranty and to the provision so modified, amended, changed, waived or discharged. No such waiver shall extend to or affect any obligation not expressly waived or impair any right consequent to such obligation. No course of dealing or delay or omission on the part of Fannie Mae in exercising any right, power or remedy under this Guaranty, the Fannie Mae Contract or applicable law shall operate as a waiver thereof or otherwise be prejudicial thereto, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, power or remedy preclude any other or future exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or remedy. The rights, powers and remedies hereunder provided to Fannie Mae are cumulative and may be exercised singly or concurrently, and are not exclusive of any rights, powers and remedies provided at law or in equity. This Guaranty may not be terminated prior to Guarantor’s full and complete performance and indefeasible payment of all of Subsidiary’s Obligations, and then only to the extent of such performance and payment.

13. Severability. Fannie Mae is relying and is entitled to rely upon each and all of the provisions of this Guaranty; and accordingly, if any provision or provisions of this agreement should be held to be invalid or ineffective, then all other provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

14. References to Guaranty. References to this “Guaranty” shall mean this Guaranty, including all amendments, modifications and supplements and any annexes, exhibits and schedules to any of the foregoing, and shall refer to this Guaranty as the same may be in effect at the time such reference becomes operative.

15. Successors and Assigns. This Guaranty shall be binding upon Guarantor, its successors (including a debtor-in-possession on behalf of Guarantor) and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of Fannie Mae and its successors, endorsees, transferees and assigns; provided , however, Guarantor shall not assign this Guaranty or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without Fannie Mae’s prior written consent. Any assignment or delegation without the prior written consent of Fannie Mae shall be absolutely void. In the event of any assignment or other transfer of rights by Fannie Mae, the rights and benefits herein conferred upon Fannie Mae shall automatically extend to and be vested in such assignee or other transferee.

16. Entire Agreement. This Guaranty constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof superseding all other discussions, promises, representations, warranties, agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, relating to a guaranty by Guarantor of the obligations under the Fannie Mae Contract. Nothing herein contained shall impair, as between Subsidiary and Fannie Mae, the obligations of Subsidiary under the Fannie Mae Contract.

17. Construction; Headings. This Guaranty has been reviewed by Guarantor and its counsel, and shall be construed and interpreted neither against nor in favor of either Fannie Mae or Guarantor but rather in accordance with the fair meaning thereof. The headings in this Guaranty are for convenience or reference only and shall not be construed in any way to limit or define the content, scope or intent of the provisions hereof.

18. Financial Statements. Within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, Guarantor shall submit copies of its audited, consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to Fannie Mae at the following address:

Fannie Mae
Attn: Counterparty Risk Monitoring Unit
One South Wacker Drive, Suite 1400
Chicago, IL 60606

Guarantor shall cause Subsidiary to continue to submit to Fannie Mae its financial statements and reports, as required by Subsidiary’s MSSC and the Fannie Mae Selling and Servicing Guides, as each may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time.

Subject to a mutually acceptable non-disclosure agreement, Guarantor shall submit copies of unaudited financial information (to the extent available) to Fannie Mae at the address above upon request by Fannie Mae.

[Signature Page to follow]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Guaranty has been duly executed by the undersigned to be effective as of the date first above written.

                        

WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP.

By: ______________________________
Name: ____________________________
Title: _____________________________


ADDENDUM “A” TO GUARANTY

Date:


Fannie Mae
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20016
Attention:     Vice President & Deputy General Counsel
Single Family Marketing and Customer Management

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as counsel to ____________________, a _________________ (“Guarantor”), in connection with the execution by Guarantor of that certain Guaranty (the “Guaranty”) by Guarantor for the benefit of Fannie Mae, dated as of _____________ 1, 20____. This opinion is being given pursuant to Section 7 of the Guaranty.

We have examined the following documents:

(a)    the Guaranty, and

(b)    such corporate records of Guarantor, documents and matters as we have deemed necessary and appropriate to render the opinion set forth in this letter.

In reaching the opinions set forth below, we have assumed the following: (i) the genuineness of all signatures, other than that of the officer of Guarantor executing the Guaranty, and (ii) the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, and the conformity with the originals (and the authenticity) of all documents submitted to us as copies.

Based upon our review of the foregoing documents, and subject to the assumptions set forth herein, it is our opinion that, as of the date of this opinion letter:

1.    The execution and delivery of the Guaranty by Guarantor has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Guarantor.

2.    The Guaranty has been duly and validly executed by Guarantor, and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Guarantor, enforceable against Guarantor in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including, without limitation, all laws relating to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors’ rights generally and to the effect of general principles of equity.

The opinions expressed in this letter are for the exclusive reliance of Fannie Mae and its successors, endorsees, transferees and assigns.

Sincerely,


-1-

EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION BY MARK J. O’BRIEN
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark J. O’Brien, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
/s/ Mark J. O’Brien
Mark J. O’Brien
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 8, 2014



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION BY GARY L. TILLETT
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Gary L. Tillett, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
/s/ Gary L. Tillett
Gary L. Tillett
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 8, 2014





EXHIBIT 32
WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Mark J. O’Brien, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary L. Tillett, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Company”), each certify to such officer’s knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
Date: May 8, 2014
By:
 
/s/ Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
Date: May 8, 2014
By:
 
/s/ Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer