UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
 _______________________________________________________________________________________
Form 10-Q
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
or
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________            
Commission file number: 001-13417
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Walter Investment Management Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Maryland
 
13-3950486
(State or other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 1100
Tampa, FL
 
33607
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(813) 421-7600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Large accelerated filer
 
x
  
Accelerated filer
 
o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
o   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   o     No   x
The registrant had 37,704,530 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2014 .
_______________________________________________________________________________________ 
 



WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page
No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
 
 
(unaudited)
 
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
303,341

 
$
491,885

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
811,670

 
804,803

Residential loans at amortized cost, net (includes $11,930 and $14,320 in allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,361,153

 
1,394,871

Residential loans at fair value
 
11,268,401

 
10,341,375

Receivables, net (includes $36,181 and $43,545 at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
288,829

 
319,195

Servicer and protective advances net (includes $79,972 and $52,238 in allowance for uncollectible advances at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,595,950

 
1,381,434

Servicing rights, net (includes $1,496,073 and $1,131,124 at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,648,544

 
1,304,900

Goodwill
 
575,468

 
657,737

Intangible assets, net
 
112,513

 
122,406

Premises and equipment, net
 
143,592

 
155,847

Other assets (includes $78,262 and $62,365 at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
276,489

 
413,076

Total assets
 
$
18,385,950

 
$
17,387,529

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities (includes $42,912 and $26,571 at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
$
622,282

 
$
494,139

Servicer payables
 
735,391

 
735,225

Servicing advance liabilities
 
1,040,441

 
971,286

Warehouse borrowings
 
1,151,216

 
1,085,563

Debt
 
2,269,590

 
2,272,085

Mortgage-backed debt (includes $651,784 and $684,778 at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,803,470

 
1,887,862

HMBS related obligations at fair value
 
9,472,666

 
8,652,746

Deferred tax liability, net
 
105,705

 
121,607

Total liabilities
 
17,200,761

 
16,220,513

 
 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 23)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders' equity:
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share:
 
 
 
 
Authorized - 10,000,000 shares
 
 
 
 
Issued and outstanding - 0 shares at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share:
 
 
 
 
Authorized - 90,000,000 shares
 
 
 
 
Issued and outstanding - 37,704,530 and 37,377,274 shares at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
 
377

 
374

Additional paid-in capital
 
594,285

 
580,572

Retained earnings
 
590,020

 
585,572

Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
507

 
498

Total stockholders' equity
 
1,185,189

 
1,167,016

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
18,385,950

 
$
17,387,529


3



The following table presents the assets and liabilities of the Company’s consolidated variable interest entities, which are included on the consolidated balance sheets above. The assets in the table below include those assets that can only be used to settle obligations of the consolidated variable interest entities. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of the consolidated variable interest entities only, and for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the Company, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation.

 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
ASSETS OF CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES THAT CAN ONLY BE USED TO SETTLE THE OBLIGATIONS OF CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES:
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
$
71,125

 
$
59,080

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,339,634

 
1,377,711

Residential loans at fair value
 
557,786

 
587,265

Receivables at fair value
 
36,181

 
43,545

Servicer and protective advances, net
 
102,927

 
75,481

Other assets
 
45,496

 
56,254

Total assets
 
$
2,153,149

 
$
2,199,336

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES OF THE CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES FOR WHICH CREDITORS OR BENEFICIAL INTEREST HOLDERS DO NOT HAVE RECOURSE TO THE COMPANY:
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
7,907

 
$
8,472

Servicing advance liabilities
 
101,323

 
67,905

Mortgage-backed debt (includes $651,784 and $684,778 at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
 
1,803,470

 
1,887,862

Total liabilities
 
$
1,912,700

 
$
1,964,239

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


4



WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)

 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
140,976

 
$
257,306

 
$
313,768

 
$
394,315

Net gains on sales of loans
 
144,611

 
235,949

 
248,645

 
314,394

Interest income on loans
 
34,218

 
36,796

 
68,640

 
73,694

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
26,936

 
26,731

 
44,172

 
63,519

Insurance revenue
 
19,806

 
18,050

 
43,194

 
35,584

Other revenues
 
47,166

 
21,132

 
65,242

 
28,987

Total revenues
 
413,713

 
595,964

 
783,661

 
910,493

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries and benefits
 
145,502

 
145,282

 
281,399

 
252,015

General and administrative
 
142,341

 
125,712

 
251,206

 
213,152

Interest expense
 
74,690

 
68,290

 
149,539

 
122,432

Depreciation and amortization
 
18,391

 
17,614

 
37,035

 
33,947

Goodwill impairment
 
82,269

 

 
82,269

 

Other expenses, net
 
3,978

 
2,151

 
4,203

 
4,247

Total expenses
 
467,171

 
359,049

 
805,651

 
625,793

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other net fair value gains (losses)
 
1,532

 
1,656

 
(971
)
 
395

Total other gains (losses)
 
1,532

 
1,656

 
(971
)
 
395

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
(51,926
)
 
238,571

 
(22,961
)
 
285,095

Income tax expense (benefit)
 
(38,997
)
 
95,339

 
(27,409
)
 
114,114

Net income (loss)
 
$
(12,929
)
 
$
143,232

 
$
4,448

 
$
170,981

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
$
(12,924
)
 
$
143,211

 
$
4,457

 
$
170,958

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
(12,929
)
 
$
143,232

 
$
4,448

 
$
170,981

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share
 
$
(0.34
)
 
$
3.82

 
$
0.12

 
$
4.56

Diluted earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share
 
(0.34
)
 
3.75

 
0.12

 
4.47

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding — basic
 
37,673

 
36,925

 
37,552

 
36,902

Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding — diluted
 
37,673

 
37,585

 
38,074

 
37,613


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5



WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)

 
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-
In Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2014
 
37,377,274

 
$
374

 
$
580,572

 
$
585,572

 
$
498

 
$
1,167,016

Net income
 

 

 

 
4,448

 

 
4,448

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 

 

 

 

 
9

 
9

Share-based compensation
 

 

 
8,301

 

 

 
8,301

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
 

 

 
55

 

 

 
55

Issuance of shares under incentive plans
 
327,256

 
3

 
5,357

 

 

 
5,360

Balance at June 30, 2014
 
37,704,530

 
$
377

 
$
594,285

 
$
590,020

 
$
507

 
$
1,185,189

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



6



WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)

 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
4,448

 
$
170,981

 
 
 
 
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities
 
 
 
 
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
(44,172
)
 
(63,519
)
Amortization of servicing rights
 
21,305

 
22,533

Change in fair value of servicing rights
 
131,186

 
(44,002
)
Non-Residual Trusts net fair value losses
 
5,125

 
1,324

Other net fair value losses
 
1,553

 
4,774

Accretion of residential loan discounts and advances
 
(7,941
)
 
(9,140
)
Accretion of discounts on debt and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
 
9,678

 
10,080

Amortization of master repurchase agreements deferred issuance costs
 
3,661

 
2,226

Amortization of servicing advance liabilities deferred issuance costs
 
3,386

 
127

Provision for uncollectible advances
 
33,815

 
10,794

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment and intangible assets
 
37,035

 
33,947

Non-Residual Trusts losses on real estate owned, net
 
231

 
524

Other gains on real estate owned, net
 
(1,256
)
 
(2,439
)
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
 
(16,232
)
 
19,259

Share-based compensation
 
8,301

 
6,542

Purchases and originations of residential loans held for sale
 
(8,037,309
)
 
(5,281,349
)
Proceeds from sales of and payments on residential loans held for sale
 
8,040,363

 
3,775,479

Net gains on sales of loans
 
(248,645
)
 
(314,394
)
Goodwill impairment
 
82,269

 

Other
 
3,061

 
1,239

 
 
 
 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities
 
 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in receivables
 
22,472

 
(17,846
)
Increase in servicer and protective advances
 
(84,508
)
 
(694,810
)
Increase in other assets
 
(14,760
)
 
(9,421
)
Increase (decrease) in payables and accrued liabilities
 
(19,737
)
 
322,377

Increase (decrease) in servicer payables
 
(7,171
)
 
234

Cash flows used in operating activities
 
(73,842
)
 
(2,054,480
)
 
 
 
 
 

7



Investing activities
 
 
 
 
Purchases and originations of reverse loans held for investment
 
(715,969
)
 
(1,864,687
)
Principal payments received on reverse loans held for investment
 
234,779

 
141,702

Principal payments received on forward loans related to Residual Trusts
 
50,562

 
53,521

Principal payments received on forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
29,383

 
30,524

Payments received on charged-off loans held for investment
 
2,055

 

Payments received on receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
5,696

 
8,141

Cash proceeds from sales of real estate owned, net related to Residual Trusts
 
6,270

 
3,641

Cash proceeds from sales of real estate owned, net related to Non-Residual Trusts and other
 
16,123

 
10,137

Purchases of premises and equipment
 
(12,958
)
 
(17,240
)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
2,421

 
(32,425
)
Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
 
(167,955
)
 
(478,084
)
Acquisitions of servicing rights
 
(101,244
)
 
(537,296
)
Acquisitions of charged-off loans held for investment
 
(57,052
)
 

Other
 
(4,962
)
 
(919
)
Cash flows used in investing activities
 
(712,851
)
 
(2,682,985
)
 
 
 
 
 
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of debt issuance costs
 

 
1,012,713

Payments on debt
 
(8,893
)
 
(39,124
)
Proceeds from securitizations of reverse loans
 
839,431

 
1,983,878

Payments on HMBS related obligations
 
(267,904
)
 
(155,312
)
Issuances of servicing advance liabilities
 
611,895

 
1,216,475

Payments on servicing advance liabilities
 
(542,740
)
 
(579,010
)
Net change in warehouse borrowings related to forward loans
 
126,425

 
1,568,301

Net change in warehouse borrowings related to reverse loans
 
(60,772
)
 
(74,125
)
Other debt issuance costs paid
 
(13,509
)
 
(6,364
)
Payments on mortgage-backed debt related to Residual Trusts
 
(51,442
)
 
(55,685
)
Payments on mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(39,224
)
 
(44,297
)
Other
 
4,882

 
581

Cash flows provided by financing activities
 
598,149

 
4,828,031

 
 
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
(188,544
)
 
90,566

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
 
491,885

 
442,054

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
 
$
303,341

 
$
532,620

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

8



WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
Walter Investment Management Corp., or the Company or Walter Investment, is a fee-based business services provider to the residential mortgage industry focused on providing primary and specialty servicing for credit-sensitive residential mortgages and reverse mortgages. The Company also originates, purchases, and sells mortgage loans into the secondary market. In addition, the Company is a mortgage portfolio owner of credit-challenged, non-conforming residential loans and reverse mortgage loans and operates an insurance agency serving residential loan borrowers. The Company operates throughout the U.S. At June 30, 2014 , the Company serviced approximately 2.3 million accounts compared to 2.1 million accounts at December 31, 2013 .
Certain acronyms and terms used throughout these notes are defined in the Glossary of Terms in Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Interim Financial Reporting
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and related notes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014 . These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 .
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s material estimates and assumptions primarily arise from risks and uncertainties associated with interest rate volatility, prepayment volatility, credit exposure, and borrower mortality rates and include, but are not limited to, the allowance for loan losses as well as the valuation of residential loans, receivables, servicing rights, goodwill and intangible assets, real estate owned, derivatives, curtailment liability, mortgage-backed debt, and HMBS related obligations. Although management is not currently aware of any factors that would significantly change its estimates and assumptions, actual results may differ from these estimates.
Changes in Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Warehouse borrowings under the Company's master repurchase agreements were separated from debt on the consolidated balance sheet. The provision for loan losses associated with the Company's residential loans carried at amortized cost is now included in other expenses, net on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Recent Accounting Guidance
In January 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that clarifies the definition of an in-substance repossession and foreclosure, and requires additional disclosures related to these items. These amendments reduce diversity in practice by clarifying when an in-substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The required disclosures under these new amendments require interim and annual disclosures of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure. The amendments in this standard are effective for the annual periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014 with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance beginning in the first quarter of 2015. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

9



In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance that supersedes most revenue recognition requirements regarding contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or for the transfer of nonfinancial assets. The guidance also supersedes most industry specific guidance but does exclude insurance contracts and financial instruments. Under the new guidance, entities are required to recognize revenue in order to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides a five-step analysis to be performed on transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those annual years beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective application or a modified retrospective application to adopt the guidance. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet identified which transition method will be applied upon adoption.
In June 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which, amongst other things, modifies the accounting for repurchase financings which represent the concurrent transfer of a financial asset and the execution of a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty. Under the new guidance, the transfer and repurchase agreement are accounted for separately with the repurchase agreement accounted for as a secured borrowing. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, the accounting for all outstanding repurchase financing transactions is to be adjusted through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB’s EITF reached a final consensus on measuring the financial assets and financial liabilities of a consolidated CFE. The EITF consensus provides an entity with an election to measure the financial assets and financial liabilities of a consolidated CFE to be measured on the basis of either the fair value of the CFE’s financial assets or financial liabilities, whichever is more observable. The effective date of the consensus will be for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption will be permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 is a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies. Provided below is a summary of additional accounting policies that are significant to the financial results of the Company as a result of transactions during the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
Residential Loans at Fair Value
Residential Loans Held for Investment
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company acquired a portfolio of defaulted consumer and residential loans at substantial discounts to face value. Defaulted loans are consumers' unpaid financial commitments and include residential mortgage loans, auto loans and other unsecured consumer loans. Additionally, as part of this acquisition, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire, on a flow basis, future portfolios of charged-off loans.
The Company elected to carry these defaulted loans, which are referred to as charged-off loans, at fair value. The yield on charged-off loans, along with any change in fair value, is recorded in other revenues on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). There is no contractual interest income recognized in relation to charged-off loans. Purchases of and principal payments received on charged-off loans are included in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Revenue Recognition

Other revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2014 include $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned in connection with the investment management of a fund. These asset management performance fees were earned in connection with the liquidation of the fund’s investments during the period and are based on the fund performance exceeding pre-defined thresholds. The Company records the asset management performance fees when the fund is terminated or when the likelihood of claw-back is improbable. These fees are recorded in the Other non-reportable segment.

10



3. Acquisitions
EverBank Net Assets
On October 30, 2013, the Company entered into a series of definitive agreements to purchase (1) certain private and GSE-backed MSRs and related servicer advances, (2) sub-servicing rights for forward loans and (3) a default servicing platform from EverBank, collectively referred to as the EverBank net assets. The agreements were structured such that ownership of the MSRs and related servicer advances and the sub-servicing rights for forward loans would transfer to the Company as investor consents were received, and the net assets associated with the default servicing platform would transfer when the data associated with the loans underlying the MSRs were boarded onto the Company’s servicing systems. The addition of EverBank's default servicing platform and employees to the Company's existing platform augmented both the Company's product capabilities and capacity as well as extended its geographic diversity as it continues to execute on the opportunities for growth available in the specialty mortgage sector.
The agreements called for an estimated total purchase price of (i) $83.4 million for the MSRs, less net cash flows received on the underlying loans between October 30, 2013 and the date of legal transfer; (ii) par value of the related servicer advances; and (iii) $1.9 million associated with the default servicing platform. The Company paid $16.7 million of the estimated purchase price on October 30, 2013.
During March 2014, the Company received approvals to transfer MSRs and sub-servicing rights with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $16.5 billion . Accordingly, the Company paid an additional $44.7 million and recorded MSRs at fair value of $58.7 million . During May 2014, the Company completed the transfer of the loans underlying the acquired MSRs onto the Company’s servicing systems and concurrently took possession of the associated servicer advances, resulting in an additional payment by the Company of $123.4 million . The remainder of the purchase price is recorded in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and is expected to be paid by the Company in the latter half of 2014. Approvals for certain private investor-backed MSRs have not been received and accordingly, no assets or related revenues and expenses have been recorded with respect thereto.
The Company has accounted for this series of transactions as a business combination in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance upon closing of the default servicing platform which occurred on May 1, 2014. As the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are expected to transfer at several dates, acquired assets and assumed liabilities for approved transactions are recorded on the dates the transfers to the Company occur.
The purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. A preliminary allocation of the purchase price has been made to major categories of assets and liabilities based on management’s estimates. The table below presents the purchase price allocation of the estimated acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed (in thousands):
 
 
Amount
Assets
 
 
Servicer and protective advances
 
$
163,160

Servicing rights
 
58,680

Premises and equipment
 
1,866

Total assets acquired
 
223,706

 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
     Payables and accrued liabilities
 
924

Total liabilities assumed
 
924

Fair value of net assets acquired
 
$
222,782


11



The EverBank net assets have been allocated to the Servicing segment. Pro forma combined revenues, net income and earnings per share assuming the EverBank net assets acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013 are not meaningful.
MSR Purchase
On December 10, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with an affiliate of a national bank to acquire a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs and related servicer advances for an estimated purchase price of $330.0 million for the MSRs, less net cash flows received on the underlying loans between December 10, 2013 and the date of legal transfer. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company closed on the agreement upon receipt of investor approval to transfer servicing, at which time the unpaid principal balance of the loans was $27.6 billion . The Company paid $165.0 million , $73.2 million and $20.0 million of the estimated total purchase price of $330.0 million in December 2013, April 2014, and June 2014 respectively. The remaining purchase price is expected to be paid during the latter half of 2014.
4. Variable Interest Entities
Included in the tables below are summaries of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
 
Residual
Trusts
 
Non-Residual
Trusts
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advance
Financing
Facilities
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
$
46,571

 
$
13,291

 
$
11,263

 
$
71,125

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,339,634

 

 

 
1,339,634

Residential loans at fair value
 

 
557,786

 

 
557,786

Receivables at fair value
 

 
36,181

 

 
36,181

Servicer and protective advances, net
 

 

 
102,927

 
102,927

Other assets
 
44,186

 
1,081

 
229

 
45,496

Total assets
 
$
1,430,391

 
$
608,339

 
$
114,419

 
$
2,153,149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
7,866

 
$

 
$
41

 
$
7,907

Servicing advance liabilities
 

 

 
101,323

 
101,323

Mortgage-backed debt
 
1,151,686

 
651,784

 

 
1,803,470

Total liabilities
 
$
1,159,552

 
$
651,784

 
$
101,364

 
$
1,912,700


12



 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Residual
Trusts
 
Non-Residual
Trusts
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advance
Financing
Facilities
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
$
44,995

 
$
13,086

 
$
999

 
$
59,080

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
1,377,711

 

 

 
1,377,711

Residential loans at fair value
 

 
587,265

 

 
587,265

Receivables at fair value
 

 
43,545

 

 
43,545

Servicer and protective advances, net
 

 

 
75,481

 
75,481

Other assets
 
54,544

 
1,302

 
408

 
56,254

Total assets
 
$
1,477,250

 
$
645,198

 
$
76,888

 
$
2,199,336

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
8,391

 
$

 
$
81

 
$
8,472

Servicing advance liabilities
 

 

 
67,905

 
67,905

Mortgage-backed debt
 
1,203,084

 
684,778

 

 
1,887,862

Total liabilities
 
$
1,211,475

 
$
684,778

 
$
67,986

 
$
1,964,239


5. Transfers of Residential Loans
Sales of Forward Loans
As part of its originations activities, the Company sells substantially all of its originated or purchased forward loans into the secondary market for securitization or to private investors as whole loans. The Company sells conventional conforming and government-backed forward loans through agency-sponsored securitizations in which mortgage-backed securities are created and sold to third-party investors. The Company also sells non-conforming forward loans to private investors. The Company accounts for these transfers as sales, and in most but not all cases, retains the servicing rights associated with the sold loans. If the servicing rights are retained, the Company receives a servicing fee for servicing the sold loans, which represents continuing involvement. 
Certain guarantees arise from agreements associated with the sale of the Company's residential loans. Under these agreements, the Company may be obligated to repurchase loans, or otherwise indemnify or reimburse the investor or insurer for losses incurred, due to material breach of contractual representations and warranties. Refer to Note 23 for further information. The following table presents the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets that relate to its continued involvement with forward loans that have been sold with servicing rights retained and the unpaid principal balance of these sold loans (in thousands):
 
 
Carrying Value of Assets
Recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance of
Sold
Loans

 
Servicing
Rights, Net
 
Servicer and
Protective
Advances, Net
 
Receivables,
Net
 
Total
 
June 30, 2014
 
$
258,544

 
$
3,365

 
$
668

 
$
262,577

 
$
21,272,121

December 31, 2013
 
192,962

 
6,023

 
437

 
199,422

 
14,672,986

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , $35.1 million and $9.1 million , respectively, in forward loans sold and serviced by the Company were 60 days or more past due. The increase in loans 60 days or more past due is related to the growth and early seasoning of the recently originated loan portfolio.
The Company has elected to measure forward loans held for sale at fair value. The gains and losses on the transfer of forward loans held for sale are included in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Also included in net gains on sales of loans is interest income earned during the period the loans were held, changes in the fair value of loans, and the gain or loss on the related freestanding derivatives. Refer to Note 7 for information on these freestanding derivatives, which include IRLCs, forward sales of agency to-be-announced securities, or forward sales commitments, and MBS

13



purchase commitments. All activity related to forward loans held for sale and the related freestanding derivatives are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The following table presents a summary of cash flows related to sales of forward loans (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Proceeds received from transfers, net of fees
$
4,032,603

 
$
3,461,692

 
$
8,080,346

 
$
3,585,745

Servicing fees collected (1)
15,634

 
426

 
26,751

 
447

Purchases of previously transferred loans
4,953

 

 
4,953

 

__________
(1)
Represents servicing fees collected on all loans sold with servicing retained.
In connection with these sales, the Company recorded servicing rights using a fair value model that utilizes Level 3 unobservable inputs. Refer to Note 11 for information relating to servicing of residential loans.
Transfers of Reverse Loans
The Company, through RMS, is an approved issuer of Ginnie Mae HMBS. The HMBS are guaranteed by Ginnie Mae and collateralized by participation interests in HECMs insured by the FHA. The Company both originates and purchases HECMs. The loans are then pooled and securitized into HMBS that the Company sells into the secondary market with servicing rights retained. Based upon the structure of the Ginnie Mae securitization program, the Company has determined that it has not met all of the requirements for sale accounting and accounts for these transfers as secured borrowings. Under this accounting treatment, the reverse loans remain on the consolidated balance sheets as residential loans. The proceeds from the transfer of reverse loans are recorded as HMBS related obligations with no gain or loss recognized on the transfer. Ginnie Mae, as guarantor of the HMBS, is obligated to the holders of the HMBS in an instance of RMS default on its servicing obligations, or when the proceeds realized on HECMs are insufficient to repay all outstanding HMBS related obligations. Ginnie Mae has recourse to RMS to the extent of the collateralized participation interests in the HECMs, but does not have recourse to the general assets of the Company, except for obligations as servicer.
The Company elects to measure reverse loans and HMBS related obligations at fair value. The change in fair value of the reverse loans and HMBS related obligations are included in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Also included in net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations is the contractual interest income earned on the reverse loans and the contractual interest expense incurred on the HMBS related obligations in addition to fair value gains on reverse loans originated and additional participations issued. Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations are recognized as an adjustment in reconciling net income or loss to the net cash provided by or used in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Purchases and originations of and repayment of principal received on reverse loans held for investment are included in investing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Proceeds from securitizations of reverse loans and payments on HMBS related obligations are included in financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
At June 30, 2014 , the unpaid principal balance and the carrying value associated with both the reverse loans and the real estate owned pledged as collateral to the securitization pools were $8.6 billion and $9.4 billion , respectively. HMBS related obligations at fair value were $9.5 billion at June 30, 2014 .
6. Fair Value
Basis or Measurement
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

14



Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The accounting guidance concerning fair value allows the Company to elect to measure financial instruments at fair value and report the changes in fair value through net income or loss. This election can only be made at certain specified dates and is irrevocable once made. Other than forward loans held for sale, all of which the Company has elected to measure at fair value, the Company does not have a fair value election policy, but rather makes the election on an instrument-by-instrument basis as assets and liabilities are acquired or incurred, other than for those assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded and subsequently measured at fair value. In addition, through the S1L acquisition, the Company recognized a contingent earn-out payments liability that it measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations.
Transfers into and out of the fair value hierarchy levels are assumed to be as of the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred. There were no transfers into or out of Level 3, and there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 .
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities in each level of the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Level 1
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Contingent earn-out payments
 
$

 
$
5,900

  Level 1 Liabilities
 

 
5,900

 
 
 
 
 
Level 2
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
Forward loans held for sale
 
1,173,588

 
1,015,607

Freestanding derivative instruments
 
2,736

 
19,534

  Level 2 Assets
 
1,176,324

 
1,035,141

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments
 
28,387

 
2,127

  Level 2 Liabilities
 
28,387

 
2,127

 
 
 
 
 
Level 3
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
9,482,030

 
8,738,503

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
557,786

 
587,265

Charged-off loans
 
54,997

 

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
36,181

 
43,545

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
1,496,073

 
1,131,124

Freestanding derivative instruments
 
75,526

 
42,831

  Level 3 Assets
 
11,702,593

 
10,543,268

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments
 
87

 
3,755

Other accrued liabilities
 
14,438

 
14,789

Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
651,784

 
684,778

HMBS related obligations
 
9,472,666

 
8,652,746

  Level 3 Liabilities
 
10,138,975

 
9,356,068


15



The following assets and liabilities are measured on the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis utilizing significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions in their valuation. The following tables provide a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of these assets and liabilities (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Fair Value
April 1,
2014
 
Total
Gains (Losses)
Included in
Net Income
 
Purchases
 
Issuances
 
Settlements
 
Fair Value
June 30,
2014
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
$
9,149,579

 
$
89,571

 
$
244,444

 
$
148,569

 
$
(150,133
)
 
$
9,482,030

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
569,097

 
16,871

 

 

 
(28,182
)
 
557,786

Charged-off loans
 

 
1,461

 
57,052

 

 
(3,516
)
 
54,997

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
39,328

 
(681
)
 

 

 
(2,466
)
 
36,181

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
1,513,830

 
(83,552
)
 
20,241

 
45,554

 

 
1,496,073

Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
38,190

 
37,336

 

 

 

 
75,526

Total assets
 
$
11,310,024

 
$
61,006

 
$
321,737

 
$
194,123

 
$
(184,297
)
 
$
11,702,593

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
$
(720
)
 
$
633

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(87
)
Other accrued liabilities
 
(14,165
)
 
(1,073
)
 

 

 
800

 
(14,438
)
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(667,536
)
 
(13,579
)
 

 

 
29,331

 
(651,784
)
HMBS related obligations
 
(9,166,998
)
 
(62,635
)
 

 
(394,385
)
 
151,352

 
(9,472,666
)
Total liabilities
 
$
(9,849,419
)
 
$
(76,654
)
 
$

 
$
(394,385
)
 
$
181,483

 
$
(10,138,975
)

 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Fair Value
January 1,
2014
 
Acquisition of EverBank Net Assets
 
Total
Gains (Losses)
Included in
Net Income
 
Purchases
 
Issuances
 
Settlements
 
Fair Value
June 30,
2014
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
$
8,738,503

 
$

 
$
294,980

 
$
438,120

 
$
278,032

 
$
(267,605
)
 
$
9,482,030

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
587,265

 

 
27,654

 

 

 
(57,133
)
 
557,786

Charged-off loans
 

 

 
1,461

 
57,052

 

 
(3,516
)
 
54,997

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
43,545

 

 
(1,668
)
 

 

 
(5,696
)
 
36,181

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
1,131,124

 
58,680

 
(131,186
)
 
339,288

 
98,167

 

 
1,496,073

Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
42,831

 

 
32,695

 

 

 

 
75,526

Total assets
 
$
10,543,268

 
$
58,680

 
$
223,936

 
$
834,460

 
$
376,199

 
$
(333,950
)
 
$
11,702,593

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
$
(3,755
)
 
$

 
$
3,668

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(87
)
Other accrued liabilities
 
(14,789
)
 

 
(1,493
)
 

 

 
1,844

 
(14,438
)
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(684,778
)
 

 
(25,414
)
 

 

 
58,408

 
(651,784
)
HMBS related obligations
 
(8,652,746
)
 

 
(250,808
)
 

 
(839,431
)
 
270,319

 
(9,472,666
)
Total liabilities
 
$
(9,356,068
)
 
$

 
$
(274,047
)
 
$

 
$
(839,431
)
 
$
330,571

 
$
(10,138,975
)


16



 
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Fair Value
April 1,
2013
 
Total
Gains (Losses)
Included in
Net Income
 
Purchases
 
Sales
 
Issuances
 
Settlements
 
Fair Value
June 30,
2013
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
$
7,106,943

 
$
101,304

 
$
464,494

 
$
(272
)
 
$
337,972

 
$
(103,806
)
 
$
7,906,635

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
627,430

 
16,938

 

 

 

 
(30,741
)
 
613,627

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
53,671

 
1,219

 

 

 

 
(4,000
)
 
50,890

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
766,943

 
65,077

 
19,885

 

 
36,305

 

 
888,210

Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
59,573

 
2,107

 

 

 

 

 
61,680

Total assets
 
$
8,614,560

 
$
186,645

 
$
484,379

 
$
(272
)
 
$
374,277

 
$
(138,547
)
 
$
9,521,042

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
$

 
$
(19,327
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(19,327
)
Other accrued liabilities
 
(17,434
)
 
356

 

 

 

 
861

 
(16,217
)
Contingent earn-out payments
 
(9,794
)
 
(1,106
)
 

 

 

 

 
(10,900
)
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(738,434
)
 
(15,845
)
 

 

 

 
33,199

 
(721,080
)
HMBS related obligations
 
(6,887,583
)
 
(74,353
)
 

 

 
(943,359
)
 
99,449

 
(7,805,846
)
Total liabilities
 
$
(7,653,245
)
 
$
(110,275
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(943,359
)
 
$
133,509

 
$
(8,573,370
)


17



 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Fair Value
January 1,
2013
 
Acquisition
of ResCap
Net Assets
 
Total
Gains (Losses)
Included in
Net Income
 
Purchases
 
Sales
 
Issuances
 
Settlements
 
Fair Value
June 30,
2013
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans (1)
 
$
6,047,108

 
$

 
$
184,581

 
$
1,258,891

 
$
(76,441
)
 
$
646,163

 
$
(153,667
)
 
$
7,906,635

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
646,498

 

 
29,957

 

 

 

 
(62,828
)
 
613,627

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
53,975

 

 
5,056

 

 

 

 
(8,141
)
 
50,890

Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
26,382

 
242,604

 
44,002

 
537,627

 

 
37,595

 

 
888,210

Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
949

 

 
60,731

 

 

 

 

 
61,680

Total assets
 
$
6,774,912

 
$
242,604

 
$
324,327

 
$
1,796,518

 
$
(76,441
)
 
$
683,758

 
$
(224,636
)
 
$
9,521,042

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Freestanding derivative instruments (IRLCs)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(19,327
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(19,327
)
Other accrued liabilities
 
(18,146
)
 

 
(26
)
 

 

 

 
1,955

 
(16,217
)
Contingent earn-out payments
 
(6,100
)
 

 
(4,800
)
 

 

 

 

 
(10,900
)
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
(757,286
)
 

 
(29,850
)
 

 

 

 
66,056

 
(721,080
)
HMBS related obligations
 
(5,874,552
)
 

 
(116,370
)
 

 

 
(1,972,103
)
 
157,179

 
(7,805,846
)
Total liabilities
 
$
(6,656,084
)
 
$

 
$
(170,373
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(1,972,103
)
 
$
225,190

 
$
(8,573,370
)
_______
(1) Includes $28.5 million in reverse loans held for sale at January 1, 2013. There were no reverse loans held for sale at June 30, 2013 .
All gains and losses on assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, with the exception of gains and losses on IRLCs, charged-off loans and servicing rights carried at fair value, are recognized in either other net fair value gains (losses) or net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses relating to IRLCs are recorded in net gains on sales of loans, changes in fair value of charged-off loans are recorded in other revenue, and changes in fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value are recorded in net servicing revenue and fees on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Total gains and losses included in net income or loss include interest income and interest expense at the stated rate for interest-bearing assets and liabilities, respectively, accretion and amortization, and the impact of changes in valuation inputs and assumptions.
The Company’s valuation committee determines and approves valuation policies and unobservable inputs used to estimate the fair value of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis, except for IRLCs and the contingent earn-out payments. The valuation committee consists of certain members of the management team responsible for accounting, treasury, servicing operations, and credit risk. The valuation committee meets on a quarterly basis to review the assets and liabilities that require fair value measurement, including how each asset and liability has actually performed in comparison to the unobservable inputs and the projected performance provided by the Company’s credit risk group. The valuation committee also reviews discount rate assumptions and related available market data. Similar procedures are followed by the Company’s originations-focused risk committee responsible for IRLCs and a sub-set of management responsible for the contingent earn-out payments. These fair values are approved by senior management.

18



The following is a description of the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as the basis for classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Residential loans at fair value
Reverse loans — These loans are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the loans. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the loans, including, but not limited to, assumptions for repayment, mortality, and discount rates. Collateral performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is primarily based on an assessment of current market yields on newly originated HECMs, expected duration of the asset, and current market interest rates. Weighted-average remaining life in years, conditional repayment rate, and discount rate are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts — These loans are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the loans. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the loans including, but not limited to, assumptions for prepayment, default, loss severity, and discount rates. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. Collateral performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is primarily based on the collateral and credit risk characteristics of these loans, combined with an assessment of market interest rates. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

Forward loans held for sale — These loans are valued using a market approach by utilizing observable forward to-be-announced prices of mortgage-backed securities. The Company classifies these loans as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Charged-off loans — These loans are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the
Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present
value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the loans. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it
believes a market participant would consider in valuing the loans including, but not limited to, collection rate as a percentage
of unpaid principal balance owed and discount rate. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, particularly collections trends and collateral performance, as well as an assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is primarily based on the expected collection rates and other credit risk characteristics of the loans. Collection rate and discount rate are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in collection rates in isolation could result in a higher (lower) fair value, while an increase (decrease) in the discount rate in isolation could result in a lower (higher) fair value.
Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts — The Company estimates the fair value of these receivables using Level 3 unobservable market inputs at the net present value of expected cash flows from the LOCs to be used to pay debt holders over the remaining life of the securitization trusts. The estimate of the cash to be collected from the LOCs is based on expected shortfalls of cash flows from the loans in the securitization trusts, compared to the required debt payments of the securitization trusts. The cash flows from the loans, and thus the cash to be provided by the LOCs, is determined by analyzing the credit assumptions for the underlying collateral in each of the securitizations. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. The discount rate assumption for these assets is based on the risk-free market rate given the credit risk characteristics of the collateral supporting the LOCs. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts are recorded in receivables, net on the consolidated balance sheets.


19



Servicing rights carried at fair value — The Company accounts for servicing rights associated with the risk-managed loan class at fair value. The Company uses the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist to develop the discounted cash flow model used to estimate the fair value of its servicing rights. The model utilizes several sensitive assumptions which are reviewed and approved by the Company, the most sensitive of which are assumptions for mortgage prepayment speeds, default rates and discount rates. The Company believes these sensitive assumptions reflect those that a market participant would use in determining fair value. These assumptions are generated and applied based on collateral stratifications including product type, remittance type, geography, delinquency, and coupon dispersion. These assumptions require the use of judgment and can have a significant impact on the determination of the servicing rights’ fair value. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The Company classifies these servicing rights within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy accordingly.

Freestanding derivative instruments — Fair values of IRLCs are derived by using both valuation models incorporating current market information or through observation of market pricing for instruments with similar characteristics and by estimating the fair value of the servicing rights expected to be recorded at sale of the loan and are adjusted for anticipated loan funding probability. Both the fair value of servicing rights expected to be recorded at the date of sale of the loan and anticipated loan funding probability are significant unobservable inputs. IRLCs are classified as Level 3. The loan funding probability ratio represents the aggregate likelihood that loans currently in a lock position will ultimately close, which is largely dependent on the loan processing stage that a loan is currently in and changes in interest rates from the time of the rate lock through the time a loan is closed. IRLCs have positive fair value at inception and change in value as interest rates and loan funding probability change. Significant changes in loan funding probability and the servicing rights component of IRLCs, in isolation, could result in a significant change to the fair value measurement. Rising interest rates have a positive effect on the fair value of the servicing rights component of the IRLC fair value and increase the loan funding probability. An increase in loan funding probability (i.e., higher aggregate likelihood of loans estimated to close) will result in the fair value of the IRLC increasing if in a gain position, or decreasing, to a lower loss, if in a loss position. A significant increase (decrease) to the fair value of servicing rights in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
The fair value of forward sales commitments and MBS purchase commitments is determined based on observed market pricing for similar instruments; therefore, these contracts are classified as Level 2. Counterparty credit risk is taken into account when determining fair value, although the impact is diminished by daily margin posting on all forward sales and purchase derivatives.
Freestanding derivative instruments are included in either other assets or payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 7 for additional information on freestanding derivative financial instruments.
Contingent earn-out payments — At December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013, the estimated fair value of this contingent liability, which is related to the Company's acquisition of S1L, was based on the average earn-out payment under multiple outcomes as determined by a Monte-Carlo simulation, discounted to present value using credit-adjusted discount rates. The average payment outcomes calculated by the Monte-Carlo simulation were derived utilizing Level 3 unobservable inputs, the most significant of which included the assumptions for forecasted financial performance of S1L and financial performance volatility. At June 30, 2013, the Company revised its estimate of the fair value of the contingent earn-out payments to $10.9 million , the maximum earn-out, based on S1L’s performance during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Other than the payment of $5.0 million made to the prior owners of S1L during the year ended December 31, 2013, no subsequent adjustments to this liability were made and the final amount to be paid was fixed and determinable at December 31, 2013. Therefore the liability was transferred out of Level 3 and was classified as Level 1 at December 31, 2013. The remaining liability recorded at December 31, 2013 was paid in February 2014. Contingent earn-out payments are included in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts — This debt is not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value of the debt is based on the net present value of the projected principal and interest payments owed for the remaining life of the securitization trusts. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions and estimates for principal and interest payments on the debt. An analysis of the credit assumptions for the underlying collateral in each of the securitization trusts is performed to determine the required payments to debt holders. The assumptions that the Company believes a market participant would consider in valuing the debt include, but are not limited to, prepayment, default, loss severity, and discount rates, as well as the balance of LOCs provided as credit enhancement. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the valuation for recent historical experience, as well as for current and expected relevant market conditions. Credit performance assumptions are primarily based on analyses of historical and projected performance trends, as well as the Company’s assessment of current and future economic conditions. The discount rate assumption for this debt is primarily based on credit characteristics combined with an assessment of market interest rates. Conditional prepayment rate, conditional default rate, and loss severity are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

20



HMBS related obligations — These obligations are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company estimates fair value using Level 3 unobservable market inputs. The estimated fair value is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the estimated life of the liability. The Company’s valuation considers assumptions that it believes a market participant would consider in valuing the liability including, but not limited to, assumptions for repayments, discount rate, and borrower mortality rates for reverse loans. The discount rate assumption for these liabilities is based on an assessment of current market yields for newly-issued HMBS, expected duration, and current market interest rates. The yield on seasoned HMBS is adjusted based on the duration of each HMBS and assuming a constant spread to the swap curve. Weighted-average remaining life in years, conditional repayment rate, and discount rate are considered to be the most significant unobservable inputs. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

21



The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow method in the fair value measurement of all Level 3 assets and liabilities included on the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis, with the exception of IRLCs for which the Company utilizes a market approach. The following table presents the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of these assets and liabilities.
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Significant
Unobservable Input
(1) (2)
 
Range of Input (3)
 
Weighted
Average of Input
(3)
 
Range of Input (3)
 
Weighted
Average of Input
(3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
2.1 - 12.9
 
4.8

 
2.0 - 12.9
 
4.4

 
 
Conditional repayment rate
 
12.95% - 36.18%
 
20.69
%
 
10.67% - 36.61%
 
20.70
%
 
 
Discount rate
 
1.89% - 4.13%
 
2.75
%
 
1.79% - 5.30%
 
2.98
%
Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
2.28% - 3.90%
 
2.91
%
 
2.20% - 3.78%
 
2.99
%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.54% - 4.75%
 
2.83
%
 
1.81% - 3.60%
 
2.90
%
 
 
Loss severity
 
74.84% - 94.01%
 
87.76
%
 
75.90% - 96.67%
 
88.09
%
Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
1.85% - 3.16%
 
2.54
%
 
1.93% - 3.11%
 
2.66
%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.73% - 5.03%
 
3.06
%
 
1.98% - 3.85%
 
3.16
%
 
 
Loss severity
 
72.04% - 91.28%
 
84.85
%
 
72.94% - 94.16%
 
85.25
%
Charged-off loans
 
Collection rate
 
0.30% - 10.26%
 
2.29
%
 
-
 
-
 
 
Discount rate
 
20.57% - 41.18%
 
22.18
%
 
-
 
-
Servicing rights carried at fair value
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
5.3 - 10.4
 
6.5

 
6.0 - 10.8
 
6.8

 
 
Discount rate
 
8.44% - 18.11%
 
9.59
%
 
8.87% - 18.11%
 
9.76
%
 
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
4.14% - 11.06%
 
8.05
%
 
3.85% - 8.08%
 
7.06
%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
0.24% - 3.85%
 
2.44
%
 
0.50% - 3.74%
 
2.90
%
Interest rate lock commitments
 
Loan funding probability
 
1.70% - 100%
 
76.69
%
 
11.99% - 100%
 
78.23
%
 
 
Fair value of servicing rights (4)  
 
0.87 - 9.49
 
3.97

 
1.64 - 5.60
 
4.21

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
Conditional prepayment rate
 
1.85% - 3.16%
 
2.54
%
 
1.93% - 3.11%
 
2.66
%
 
 
Conditional default rate
 
1.73% - 5.03%
 
3.06
%
 
1.98% - 3.85%
 
3.16
%
 
 
Loss severity
 
72.04% - 91.28%
 
84.85
%
 
72.94% - 94.16%
 
85.25
%
HMBS related obligations
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
1.6 - 7.7
 
4.1

 
1.9 - 7.8
 
4.1

 
 
Conditional repayment rate
 
10.86% - 41.44%
 
20.20
%
 
10.22% - 38.67%
 
20.31
%
 
 
Discount rate
 
1.31% - 3.24%
 
1.92
%
 
1.38% - 4.01%
 
2.36
%
Interest rate lock commitments
 
Loan funding probability
 
29.44% - 100%
 
80.36
%
 
46.50% - 100%
 
82.67
%
 
 
Fair value of servicing rights (4)  
 
1.96 - 5.21
 
4.19

 
1.89 - 5.30
 
4.52

__________
(1)
Conditional repayment rate includes assumptions for both voluntary and involuntary rates as well as assumptions for the assignment of HECMs to HUD, in accordance with obligations as servicer.
(2)
Voluntary and involuntary prepayment rates have been presented as conditional prepayment rate and conditional default rate, respectively.
(3)
With the exception of loss severity, fair value of servicing rights embedded in IRLCs and discount rate on charged-off loans, all significant unobservable inputs above are based on the related unpaid principal balance of the underlying collateral, or in the case of HMBS related obligations, the balance outstanding. Loss severity is based on projected liquidations. Fair value of servicing rights embedded in IRLCs represents a multiple of the annual servicing fee. The discount rate on charged-off loans is based on the loan balance at fair value.
(4)
Excludes the impact of IRLCs identified as servicing released.

22



Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Real estate owned, net is included on the consolidated financial statements within other assets and is measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis utilizing significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions in their valuation (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Real estate owned, net
 
$
79,079

 
$
73,573

The following table presents the significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of real estate owned, net at June 30, 2014 measured on the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Significant
Unobservable Input
 
Range of Input
 
Weighted
Average of Input
 
Range of Input
 
Weighted
Average of Input
Real estate owned, net
 
Loss severity (1)
 
0.00% - 59.58%
 
8.42
%
 
0.00% - 88.68%
 
9.48
%
__________
(1)
Loss severity is based on projected liquidations.
The Company held real estate owned, net of $43.8 million , $34.2 million and $1.1 million in the Reverse Mortgage and Loans and Residuals segments and Other non-reportable segment, respectively, at June 30, 2014 . The Company held real estate owned, net of $27.0 million , $45.3 million and $1.3 million in the Reverse Mortgage and Loans and Residuals segments and Other non-reportable segment, respectively, at December 31, 2013 . In determining fair value, the Company either obtains appraisals or performs a review of historical severity rates of real estate owned previously sold by the Company. When utilizing historical severity rates, the properties are stratified by collateral type and/or geographical concentration and length of time held by the Company. The severity rates are reviewed for reasonableness by comparison to third-party market trends and fair value is determined by applying severity rates to the stratified population. Management approves valuations that have been determined using the historical severity rate method.
Included in other expenses, net are lower of cost or fair value adjustments of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and $0.6 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.



23



Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities that are not recorded at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis and their respective levels within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Fair Value
Hierarchy
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
Level 1
 
$
303,341

 
$
303,341

 
$
491,885

 
$
491,885

Restricted cash and cash equivalents
 
Level 1
 
811,670

 
811,670

 
804,803

 
804,803

Residential loans at amortized cost, net
 
Level 3
 
1,361,153

 
1,309,382

 
1,394,871

 
1,341,376

Insurance premium receivables
 
Level 3
 
100,527

 
95,904

 
103,149

 
97,902

Servicer and protective advances, net
 
Level 3
 
1,595,950

 
1,543,203

 
1,381,434

 
1,332,315

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables to insurance carriers
 
Level 3
 
79,551

 
78,544

 
69,489

 
68,470

Servicer payables
 
Level 1
 
735,391

 
735,391

 
735,225

 
735,225

Servicing advance liabilities (1)
 
Level 3
 
1,035,485

 
1,040,441

 
970,884

 
971,286

Warehouse borrowings (1)
 
Level 1
 
1,147,935

 
1,151,216

 
1,084,112

 
1,085,563

Debt (1)
 
Level 2
 
2,229,854

 
2,324,221

 
2,229,969

 
2,322,709

Mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost (1)
 
Level 3
 
1,139,250

 
1,138,758

 
1,189,536

 
1,192,510

__________
(1)
The carrying amounts of servicing advance liabilities, warehouse borrowings, debt and mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost are net of deferred issuance costs.
The following is a description of the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis.
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, servicer payables and warehouse borrowings — The estimated fair values of these financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to their highly-liquid or short-term nature.
Residential loans carried at amortized cost, net — The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of residential loans carried at amortized cost are the same as those described for forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts carried at fair value on a recurring basis.
Insurance premium receivables — The estimated fair value of these receivables is based on the net present value of the expected cash flows. The determination of fair value includes assumptions related to the underlying collateral serviced by the Company, such as delinquency and default rates, as the insurance premiums are collected as part of the borrowers’ loan payments or from the related trusts.
Servicer and protective advances, net — The estimated fair value of these advances is based on the net present value of expected cash flows. The determination of expected cash flows includes consideration of recoverability clauses in the Company’s servicing agreements, as well as assumptions related to the underlying collateral when proceeds may be used to recover these receivables.
Payables to insurance carriers — The estimated fair value of these liabilities is based on the net present value of the expected carrier payments over the life of the payables.
Servicing advance liabilities — The estimated fair value of these liabilities is based on the net present value of projected cash flows over the expected life of the liabilities at estimated market rates.
Debt — The Company’s 2013 Term Loan, Convertible Notes, and Senior Notes are not traded in an active, open market with readily observable prices. The estimated fair value of this debt is based on an average of broker quotes.
Mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost — The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of mortgage-backed debt carried at amortized cost are the same as those described for mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

24



Fair Value Option
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments, including forward loans, receivables and mortgage-backed debt related to the Non-Residual Trusts, forward loans held for sale, charged-off loans, and reverse loans and HMBS related obligations. The fair value option was elected for these assets and liabilities as the Company believes fair value best reflects the expected future economic performance of these assets and liabilities. The yield on forward loans of the Non-Residual Trusts and reverse loans along with any change in fair value are recorded in either other net fair value gains (losses) or net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). The yield on forward loans held for sale along with any change in fair value is recorded in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). The yield on charged-off loans along with any change in fair value is recorded in other revenues on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). With the exception of charged-off loans, the yield on loans includes recognition of interest income based on the stated interest rates of the loans that is expected to be collected as well as accretion of fair value adjustments. There is no contractual interest income recognized in relation to charged-off loans.
Presented in the table below is the estimated fair value and unpaid principal balance of loans, receivables and debt instruments for which the Company has elected the fair value option (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Loans and receivables at fair value under the fair value option
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reverse loans (1)
 
$
9,482,030

 
$
8,741,715

 
$
8,738,503

 
$
8,135,927

Forward loans held for sale (1)
 
1,173,588

 
1,106,136

 
1,015,607

 
976,774

Forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
557,786

 
687,940

 
587,265

 
727,110

Charged-off loans
 
54,997

 
3,272,912

 

 

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts (2)
 
36,181

 
36,524

 
43,545

 
43,988

Total
 
$
11,304,582

 
$
13,845,227

 
$
10,384,920

 
$
9,883,799

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt instruments at fair value under the fair value option
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed debt related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
$
651,784

 
$
695,366

 
$
684,778

 
$
735,379

HMBS related obligations (2)
 
9,472,666

 
8,646,651

 
8,652,746

 
7,959,711

Total
 
$
10,124,450

 
$
9,342,017

 
$
9,337,524

 
$
8,695,090

__________
(1)
Includes loans that collateralize master repurchase agreements. Refer to Note 16 for further information.
(2)
For the receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts, the unpaid principal balance represents the notional amount of expected draws under the LOCs. For the HMBS related obligations, the unpaid principal balance represents the balance outstanding.
Included in forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts are loans that are 90 days or more past due that have a fair value of $1.5 million and $1.7 million , and an unpaid principal balance of $8.2 million and $9.4 million , at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. All charged-off loans are 90 days or more past due.
Included in other net fair value gains (losses) are fair value gains and losses from instrument-specific credit risk that include changes in fair value due to changes in assumptions related to prepayments, defaults, and severity. The Company recorded fair value gains (losses) from changes in instrument-specific credit risk for forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts and receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts of $0.5 million and $(0.6) million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 , respectively, and $1.1 million and $(1.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 , respectively. The Company recorded fair value gains (losses) from changes in instrument-specific credit risk for forward loans related to Non-Residual Trusts and receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts of $0.9 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 , respectively, and $(3.8) million and $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 , respectively. There were no gains or losses from instrument-specific credit risk relating to charged-off loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. As a result of being insured by the FHA, instrument-specific credit risk associated with reverse loans is insignificant. Due to the short holding period of forward loans held for sale, related fair value gains and losses from instrument-specific credit risk are insignificant.

25



Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of net gains on sales of loans (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Realized gains on sales of loans
 
$
102,517

 
$
67,218

 
$
189,350

 
$
75,526

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on loans held for sale
 
23,353

 
(15,897
)
 
19,177

 
(2,271
)
Gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments
 
37,969

 
(17,217
)
 
36,363

 
41,404

Gains (losses) on forward sales commitments
 
(63,956
)
 
183,625

 
(99,812
)
 
179,688

Losses on MBS purchase commitments
 
(7,709
)
 
(24,662
)
 
(7,642
)
 
(24,662
)
Capitalized servicing rights
 
45,554

 
36,305

 
98,167

 
37,595

Provision for repurchases
 
(1,838
)
 
(2,010
)
 
(4,024
)
 
(2,181
)
Interest income
 
8,721

 
8,473

 
17,066

 
9,261

Other
 

 
114

 

 
34

Net gains on sales of loans
 
$
144,611

 
$
235,949

 
$
248,645

 
$
314,394

Net Fair Value Gains on Reverse Loans and Related HMBS Obligations
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net fair value gains (losses) on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income on reverse loans
 
$
98,258

 
$
86,514

 
$
195,139

 
$
163,781

Change in fair value of reverse loans
 
(8,687
)
 
14,570

 
99,841

 
16,108

Net fair value gains on reverse loans
 
89,571

 
101,084

 
294,980

 
179,889

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense on HMBS related obligations
 
(91,470
)
 
(79,545
)
 
(182,030
)
 
(149,220
)
Change in fair value of HMBS related obligations
 
28,835

 
5,192

 
(68,778
)
 
32,850

Net fair value losses on HMBS related obligations
 
(62,635
)
 
(74,353
)
 
(250,808
)
 
(116,370
)
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
$
26,936

 
$
26,731

 
$
44,172

 
$
63,519

7. Freestanding Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company enters into commitments to originate and purchase forward loans at interest rates that are determined prior to the funding or purchase of the loan, which are referred to as IRLCs. IRLCs are considered freestanding derivatives and are recorded at fair value at inception within other assets or payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair value subsequent to inception are based on changes in the fair value of the underlying loan and changes in the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. Changes in the fair value of the IRLCs are included in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forward sales commitments, to manage exposure to interest rate risk and changes in the fair value of IRLCs and forward loans held for sale. The Company may also enter into commitments to purchase MBS as part of its overall hedging strategy. The Company has elected not to designate these freestanding derivatives as hedging instruments under GAAP. The fair value of these instruments are recorded in other assets or payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets with changes in the fair values included in net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Cash flows related to IRLCs, forward sales commitments, and MBS purchase commitments are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

26



In connection with the forward sales commitments and MBS purchase commitments, the Company has entered into collateral agreements with its counterparties whereby both parties are required to maintain cash deposits in the event the fair values of the derivative financial instruments meet established thresholds, which mitigates counterparty credit risk. The right to receive cash collateral placed by the Company with its counterparties is included in other assets and the obligation to return collateral received by the Company from its counterparties is included within payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has elected to record derivative assets and liabilities and related collateral on a gross basis, even when a legally enforceable master netting arrangement exists between the Company and the derivative counterparty.
The derivative transactions described above are measured in terms of the notional amount. With the exception of IRLCs, the notional amount is generally not exchanged and is used only as a basis on which interest and other payments are determined.
The following table provides the total notional or contractual amounts and related fair values of derivative assets and liabilities not designated as hedging instruments as well as cash collateral (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Notional/
Contractual
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Notional/
Contractual
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Derivative
Assets
 
Derivative
Liabilities
 
 
Derivative
Assets
 
Derivative
Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments
 
$
3,444,936

 
$
75,526

 
$
87

 
$
2,202,638

 
$
42,831

 
$
3,755

Forward sales commitments
 
3,879,108

 
1

 
28,387

 
2,903,700

 
19,534

 
247

MBS purchase commitments
 
504,700

 
2,735

 

 
308,700

 

 
1,880

Total derivative instruments
 
 
 
$
78,262

 
$
28,474

 
 
 
$
62,365

 
$
5,882

Cash collateral
 
 
 
$
20,460

 
$
1,587

 
 
 
$

 
$
19,148

Derivative positions subject to netting arrangements allow the Company to net settle asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral, with the same counterparty and include all forward sale commitments, MBS purchase commitments, and cash collateral at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 included in the table above. After consideration of these netting arrangements and offsetting positions by counterparty, the total net settlement amount as it relates to these positions are asset positions of $1.9 million and $2.3 million , and liability positions of $8.7 million and $4.1 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. A master netting arrangement with one of the Company’s counterparties also allows for offsetting derivative positions and collateral against amounts associated with the master repurchase agreement with that same counterparty. At June 30, 2014 , the Company’s net derivative liability position of $5.5 million with that counterparty could be offset against any over collateralized positions associated with the master repurchase agreement to the extent available. Over collateralized positions on master repurchase agreements are not reflected as collateral in the table above.
Gains and losses related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are recorded as a component of net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Refer to Note 6 for a summary of these gains and losses.
8. Residential Loans at Amortized Cost, Net
Residential loans at amortized cost, net consist of forward loans held for investment. The majority of these residential loans are held in securitization trusts that have been consolidated.
Residential loans at amortized cost, net are comprised of the following components (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Residential loans, principal balance
 
$
1,499,184

 
$
1,542,056

Unamortized discounts and other cost basis adjustments, net (1)
 
(126,101
)
 
(132,865
)
Allowance for loan losses
 
(11,930
)
 
(14,320
)
Residential loans at amortized cost, net (2)
 
$
1,361,153

 
$
1,394,871

__________
(1)
Included in unamortized discounts and other cost-basis adjustments, net is $12.4 million and $12.8 million of accrued interest receivable at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively.
(2)
Included in residential loans at amortized cost, net is $21.5 million and $17.2 million of unencumbered forward loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively.

27



Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Residential Loans at Amortized Cost and the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable incurred credit losses inherent in the residential loan portfolio carried at amortized cost as of the balance sheet date. This portfolio is made up of one segment and class that consists primarily of less-than prime, credit-challenged residential loans. The risk characteristics of the portfolio segment and class relate to credit exposure. The method for monitoring and assessing credit risk is the same throughout the portfolio.
Residential loans carried at amortized cost are homogeneous and evaluated collectively for impairment. The determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses is based on, but not limited to, delinquency levels, default frequency experience, prior loan loss severity experience, and management’s judgment and assumptions regarding various matters, including the composition of the residential loan portfolio, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, the estimated value of the underlying real estate collateral, the level of the allowance in relation to total loans and to historical loss levels, current economic and market conditions within the applicable geographic areas surrounding the underlying real estate, changes in unemployment levels, and the impact that changes in interest rates have on a borrower’s ability to refinance its loan and to meet its repayment obligations. Management evaluates these assumptions and various other relevant factors impacting credit quality and inherent losses when quantifying the Company’s exposure to credit losses and assessing the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses as of each reporting date. The level of the allowance is adjusted based on the results of management’s analysis. Generally, as residential loans season, the credit exposure is reduced, resulting in decreasing provisions.
The allowance for loan losses is highly correlated to unemployment levels, delinquency status of the portfolio, and changes in home prices within the Company’s geographic markets. There has been a steady improvement in market conditions including an increase in median home selling prices and lower levels of housing inventory. Additionally, the unemployment rate has continued to stabilize since reaching a peak in October 2009. With continued stabilization in economic trends and portfolio performance, the Company expects continued improvement in the credit quality of the residential loan portfolio.
While the Company considers the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used by management in determining the allowance for loan losses.
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses on residential loans at amortized cost, net (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of the period
 
$
12,084

 
$
19,932

 
$
14,320

 
$
20,435

Provision for loan losses  (1)
 
1,521

 
95

 
517

 
1,821

Charge-offs, net of recoveries (2)
 
(1,675
)
 
(1,721
)
 
(2,907
)
 
(3,950
)
Balance at end of the period
 
$
11,930

 
$
18,306

 
$
11,930

 
$
18,306

__________
(1)
Provision for loan losses is included in other expense, net on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)
Includes charge-offs recognized upon acquisition of real estate in satisfaction of residential loans of $1.0 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and $2.1 million and $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.

28



The following table summarizes the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in residential loans at amortized cost by basis of accounting (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Allowance for loan losses
 
 
 
 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
10,372

 
$
13,058

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment and acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
1,558

 
1,262

Total
 
$
11,930

 
$
14,320

 
 
 
 
 
Recorded investment in residential loans at amortized cost
 
 
 
 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
1,347,883

 
$
1,383,252

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment and acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
25,200

 
25,939

Total
 
$
1,373,083

 
$
1,409,191

  Aging of Past Due Residential Loans and Credit Risk Profile Based on Delinquencies
Residential loans at amortized cost are placed on non-accrual status when any portion of the principal or interest is 90 days past due. When placed on non-accrual status, the related interest receivable is reversed against interest income of the current period. Interest income on non-accrual loans, if received, is recorded using the cash-basis method of accounting. Residential loans are removed from non-accrual status when there is no longer significant uncertainty regarding collection of the principal and the associated interest. If a non-accrual loan is returned to accruing status, the accrued interest existing at the date the residential loan is placed on non-accrual status and interest during the non-accrual period are recorded as interest income as of the date the loan no longer meets the non-accrual criteria. The past due or delinquency status of residential loans is generally determined based on the contractual payment terms. In the case of loans with an approved repayment plan, including plans approved by the bankruptcy court, delinquency is based on the modified due date of the loan. Loan balances are charged off when it becomes evident that balances are not collectible. 
Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality and minimizing loan losses include sound loan underwriting, monitoring of existing loans, early identification of problem loans, timely resolution of problems, an appropriate allowance for loan losses, and sound non-accrual and charge-off policies. The Company primarily utilizes delinquency status to monitor the credit quality of the portfolio. The Company considers all loans 30 days or more past due to be non-performing and all loans that are current to be performing with regard to its credit quality profile.
The following table presents the aging of the residential loan portfolio accounted for at amortized cost, net (in thousands):
 
 
30-59
Days Past
Due
 
60-89
Days Past
Due
 
90 Days
or More
Past Due
 
Total
Past Due
(1)
 
Current (2)
 
Total
Residential
Loans
 
Non-
Accrual
Loans
Recorded investment in residential loans at amortized cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
$
22,876

 
$
8,901

 
$
51,516

 
$
83,293

 
$
1,289,790

 
$
1,373,083

 
$
51,516

December 31, 2013
 
18,798

 
7,186

 
54,836

 
80,820

 
1,328,371

 
1,409,191

 
54,836

_________
(1)
Balances represent non-performing loans for the credit quality profile.
(2)
Balances represent performing loans for the credit quality profile.
9. Residential Loans at Fair Value
Residential Loans Held for Investment
Residential loans held for investment and carried at fair value include reverse loans, forward loans in Non-Residual Trusts and charged-off loans. The Company purchased and originated reverse loans in the amount of $393.0 million and $800.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. The Company purchased and originated reverse loans in the amount of $716.2 million and $1.9 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. The Company purchased charged-off loans with an unpaid principal balance of $3.3 billion for $57.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 .

29



Residential Loans Held for Sale
The Company sells substantially all of its originated or purchased forward loans into the secondary market for securitization or to private investors as whole loans. The Company typically retains the right to service these loans. Refer to Note 5 for additional information regarding these sales of residential loans.
A reconciliation of the changes in residential loans held for sale is presented in the following table (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
630,456

 
$
278,474

 
$
1,015,607

 
$
45,065

Purchases and originations of loans held for sale
 
4,453,761

 
4,848,332

 
8,037,309

 
5,281,349

Proceeds from sales of and payments on loans held for sale (1)
 
(4,045,058
)
 
(3,522,518
)
 
(8,104,759
)
 
(3,749,979
)
Realized gains on sales of loans (2)
 
102,517

 
67,218

 
189,350

 
75,526

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on loans held for sale (2)
 
23,353

 
(15,897
)
 
19,177

 
(2,271
)
Interest income (2)
 
8,721

 
8,473

 
17,066

 
9,261

Transfers from loans held for investment
 

 
43

 

 
5,183

Other
 
(162
)
 
90

 
(162
)
 
81

Balance at end of period
 
$
1,173,588

 
$
1,664,215

 
$
1,173,588

 
$
1,664,215

_______  
(1)
Excludes realized gains (losses) on freestanding derivatives.
(2)
Amount is a component of net gains on sales of loans on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Refer to Note 6 for additional information.
10. Receivables, Net
Receivables, net consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Insurance premium receivables
 
$
100,527

 
$
103,149

Servicing fee receivables
 
59,664

 
54,794

Receivables related to Non-Residual Trusts
 
36,181

 
43,545

Income tax receivables
 
47,766

 
53,495

Other receivables
 
48,900

 
67,126

Total receivables
 
293,038

 
322,109

Less: Allowance for uncollectible receivables
 
(4,209
)
 
(2,914
)
Receivables, net
 
$
288,829

 
$
319,195

11. Servicing of Residential Loans
The Company provides servicing for third-party investors in forward and reverse loans and for loans recognized on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s total servicing portfolio consists of accounts serviced for others for which servicing rights have been capitalized, accounts sub-serviced for others, as well as residential loans and real estate owned recognized on the consolidated balance sheets.

30



Provided below is a summary of the Company’s total servicing portfolio (dollars in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Third-party investors (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capitalized servicing rights
 
1,561,604

 
$
176,305,631

 
1,310,357

 
$
146,143,213

Capitalized sub-servicing (2)
 
217,692

 
11,996,994

 
235,112

 
13,369,236

Sub-servicing
 
442,151

 
51,727,596

 
393,640

 
47,006,325

Total third-party servicing portfolio
 
2,221,447

 
240,030,221

 
1,939,109

 
206,518,774

On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned
 
115,118

 
12,050,445

 
112,687

 
11,442,362

Total servicing portfolio (3)
 
2,336,565

 
$
252,080,666

 
2,051,796

 
$
217,961,136

__________
(1)
Includes real estate owned serviced for third parties.
(2)
Consists of sub-servicing contracts acquired through business combinations whereby the benefits from the contract are greater than “adequate compensation” for performing the servicing.
(3)
Includes accounts serviced by the Servicing and Reverse Mortgage segments and excludes charged-off loans managed by the ARM segment.
Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
The Company services loans for itself, as well as for third parties, and earns servicing income from its third-party servicing portfolio. The following table presents the components of net servicing revenue and fees, which includes revenues earned by the Servicing, ARM and Reverse Mortgage segments (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Servicing fees
 
$
173,147

 
$
143,473

 
$
339,180

 
$
263,345

Incentive and performance fees
 
41,482

 
41,379

 
84,339

 
75,104

Ancillary and other fees (1)
 
20,087

 
18,586

 
42,740

 
34,397

Servicing revenue and fees
 
234,716

 
203,438

 
466,259

 
372,846

Amortization of servicing rights
 
(10,188
)
 
(11,209
)
 
(21,305
)
 
(22,533
)
Change in fair value of servicing rights
 
(83,552
)
 
65,077

 
(131,186
)
 
44,002

Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
140,976

 
$
257,306

 
$
313,768

 
$
394,315

__________
(1)
Includes late fees of $10.3 million and $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and $22.6 million and $17.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Servicing Rights
Servicing rights are represented by three classes, which consist of a risk-managed forward loan class, or the risk-managed loan class, a forward loan class, and a reverse loan class. These classes are based on the availability of market inputs used in determining the fair values of servicing rights and risk management strategies available to the Company. Risks inherent in servicing rights include prepayment and interest rate risks. The risk-managed loan class includes portfolios for which the Company may apply a hedging strategy in the future. At initial recognition, the fair value of the servicing right is established using assumptions consistent with those used to establish the fair value of existing servicing rights. Subsequent to initial capitalization, servicing rights are accounted for using either the fair value method or the amortization method based on the servicing class. Servicing rights carried at amortized cost consist of the forward loan class and the reverse loan class. Servicing rights carried at fair value consist of the risk-managed loan class.

31



Servicing Rights at Amortized Cost
The following tables summarize the activity in the carrying value of servicing rights accounted for at amortized cost by class (in thousands):
 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Forward Loan
 
Reverse Loan
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2014
 
$
161,782

 
$
11,994

 
$
173,776

Amortization
 
(10,367
)
 
(750
)
 
(11,117
)
Balance at March 31, 2014
 
151,415

 
11,244

 
162,659

Amortization
 
(9,495
)
 
(693
)
 
(10,188
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
 
$
141,920

 
$
10,551

 
$
152,471

 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Forward Loan
 
Reverse Loan
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2013
 
$
227,191

 
$
15,521

 
$
242,712

Reclassifications (1)
 
(26,382
)
 

 
(26,382
)
Purchases
 
36

 

 
36

Amortization
 
(10,406
)
 
(918
)
 
(11,324
)
Balance at March 31, 2013
 
190,439

 
14,603

 
205,042

Amortization
 
(10,334
)
 
(875
)
 
(11,209
)
Balance at June 30, 2013
 
$
180,105

 
$
13,728

 
$
193,833

_______
(1)
Represents servicing rights for which the Company elected fair value accounting as of January 1, 2013. This election had no impact on retained earnings.
Servicing rights accounted for at amortized cost are evaluated for impairment by strata based on their estimated fair values. The risk characteristics used to stratify servicing rights for purposes of measuring impairment are the type of loan products, which consist of manufactured housing loans, first lien residential mortgages and second lien residential mortgages for the forward loan class, and reverse mortgages for the reverse loan class. At June 30, 2014 , the fair value of servicing rights for the forward loan class and the reverse loan class was $172.1 million and $15.4 million , respectively. At December 31, 2013 , the fair value of servicing rights for the forward loan class and the reverse loan class was $192.1 million and $15.9 million , respectively. Fair value was estimated using the present value of projected cash flows over the estimated period of net servicing income. The estimation of fair value requires significant judgment and uses key economic inputs and assumptions, which are provided in the table below (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
 
Forward Loan
 
Reverse Loan
Fair value of servicing rights carried at amortized cost
 
$
172,149

 
$
15,430

Inputs and assumptions:
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
5.5

 
3.3

Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
7.80
%
 
3.44
%
Weighted-average discount rate
 
12.16
%
 
15.00
%
Conditional prepayment rate
 
6.29
%
 
(1  
)  
Conditional default rate
 
3.30
%
 
(1  
)  
Conditional repayment rate
 
(2  
)  
 
23.45
%
__________
(1)
For the reverse loan class, conditional repayment rate includes assumptions for both voluntary and involuntary rates as well as assumptions for the assignment of HECMs to HUD, in accordance with obligations as servicer.
(2)
For the forward loan class, voluntary and involuntary prepayment rates have been presented as conditional prepayment rate and conditional default rate, respectively.

32



The valuation of servicing rights is affected by the underlying assumptions above. Should the actual performance and timing differ materially from the Company’s projected assumptions, the estimate of fair value of the servicing rights could be materially different.
Servicing Rights at Fair Value
The following table summarizes the activity in servicing rights carried at fair value (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period (1)
 
$
1,513,830

 
$
766,943

 
$
1,131,124

 
$
26,382

Acquisition of EverBank net assets
 

 

 
58,680

 

Acquisition of ResCap net assets
 

 

 

 
242,604

Purchases (2)
 
20,241

 
19,885

 
339,288

 
537,627

Servicing rights capitalized upon sales of loans
 
45,554

 
36,305

 
98,167

 
37,595

Changes in fair value due to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions (3)
 
(43,376
)
 
93,311

 
(68,994
)
 
89,331

Other changes in fair value (4)
 
(40,176
)
 
(28,234
)
 
(62,192
)
 
(45,329
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
1,496,073

 
$
888,210

 
$
1,496,073

 
$
888,210

__________
(1)
There were no servicing rights carried at fair value at December 31, 2012. The balance at the beginning of the period for the six months ended June 30, 2014 presented above represents those servicing rights for which the Company elected fair value accounting as of January 1, 2013.
(2) Purchases for the six months ended June 30, 2014 primarily include a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs. Refer to Note 3 for additional information. Purchases for the six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily include servicing rights associated with an asset purchase from BOA.
(3) Represents the change in servicing rights carried at fair value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(4) Represents the change in servicing rights carried at fair value due to the realization of expected cash flows over time.

The fair value of servicing rights accounted for at fair value was estimated using the present value of projected cash flows over the estimated period of net servicing income. The estimation of fair value requires significant judgment and uses key economic inputs and assumptions, which are provided in the table below:
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
6.5

 
6.8

Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
4.87
%
 
5.20
%
Weighted-average discount rate
 
9.59
%
 
9.76
%
Conditional prepayment rate
 
8.05
%
 
7.06
%
Conditional default rate
 
2.44
%
 
2.90
%
The valuation of servicing rights is affected by the underlying assumptions above. Should the actual performance and timing differ materially from the Company's projected assumptions, the estimate of fair value of the servicing rights could be materially different.

33



The following table summarizes the hypothetical effect on the fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value using adverse changes of 10% and 20% to the weighted-average of certain significant assumptions used in valuing these assets (dollars in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Decline in fair value due to
 
 
 
Decline in fair value due to
 
 
Actual
 
10% adverse change
 
20% adverse change
 
Actual
 
10% adverse change
 
20% adverse change
Weighted-average discount rate
 
9.59
%
 
$
(57,852
)
 
$
(114,304
)
 
9.76
%
 
$
(49,687
)
 
$
(95,531
)
Conditional prepayment rate
 
8.05
%
 
(61,333
)
 
(118,572
)
 
7.06
%
 
(47,114
)
 
(88,411
)
Conditional default rate
 
2.44
%
 
(25,058
)
 
(40,182
)
 
2.90
%
 
(12,778
)
 
(25,110
)
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the servicing rights is calculated without changing any other assumption, while in reality changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which may either magnify or counteract the effect of the change.
Fair Value of Originated Servicing Rights
For forward loans sold with servicing retained, the Company used the following inputs and assumptions to determine the fair value of servicing rights at the dates of sale. These servicing rights are included in servicing rights capitalized upon sales of loans in the table presented above that summarizes the activity in servicing rights accounted for at fair value.
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Weighted-average life in years
 
6.8-7.3
 
7.2-9.6
 
6.8-7.7
 
 6.1-9.6
Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
4.48% - 4.54%
 
3.85% - 4.20%
 
4.48% - 4.67%
 
3.85% - 4.20%
Weighted-average discount rates
 
9.50%
 
 9.50% - 10.40%
 
9.50%
 
9.50% - 12.30%
Conditional prepayment rates
 
8.11% - 8.76%
 
3.00% - 5.10%
 
7.26% - 8.76%
 
3.00% - 8.10%
Conditional default rates
 
0.59% - 0.67%
 
0.50% - 2.00%
 
0.59% - 0.67%
 
0.50% - 2.00%
12. Goodwill
The table below sets forth the activity in goodwill by reportable segment (in thousands):
 
 
Reportable Segment
 
 
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse Mortgage
 
Asset Receivables Management
 
Insurance
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2013
 
$
432,267

 
$
47,747

 
$
138,808

 
$
34,518

 
$
4,397

 
$
657,737

Impairment
 

 

 
(82,269
)
 

 

 
(82,269
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
 
$
432,267

 
$
47,747

 
$
56,539

 
$
34,518

 
$
4,397

 
$
575,468

During August 2013, HUD announced certain changes to the HECM program that impacted the reverse products available to borrowers and reduced the available principal to be drawn initially by borrowers, deferring a significant amount of cash flow to future years. The regulatory changes required industry participants to revise their overall business strategies and develop new products available to borrowers. These changes created competitive pressures in the overall market place resulting in reduced and delayed cash flows, and therefore discounted cash flows are negatively impacted due to the time value of money theory.
As a result of the August 2013 changes, our Reverse Mortgage reporting unit has experienced operating challenges during 2014. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company developed a new strategy to increase the volume of new loans sourced through the reporting unit’s retail origination channel which is anticipated to provide higher cash flows to the reporting unit. As part of this

34



process, the Company revised its multi-year forecast for the Reverse Mortgage business. The change in assumptions used in the revised forecast and the fair value estimates utilized in the impairment testing of the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit goodwill incorporated insights gained since acquiring the Reverse Mortgage business. The lower projected revenue is a product of the changes to the HECM program noted above. The revised forecast also reflected changes related to current market trends, a likely reduction of certain fee revenue streams, business mix, cost structure, and other expectations about the anticipated short-term operating results of the Reverse business.
The Company considered its lower operating results over a sustained period of time due to increased costs to service, adverse market conditions and regulatory trends within the reverse loan industry driving lower volume and reduced cash flows on the origination of reverse loans through the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit’s correspondent channel, as well as changes in our Reverse strategy and the revised financial forecast in determining that there were interim impairment indicators that led to the need for a quantitative impairment analysis for Goodwill purposes during the second quarter.
The fair value of the Reverse reporting unit was based on the income approach. The decline in the fair value of the Reverse reporting unit resulted from lower projected revenue growth rates and profitability levels in the short term, as well as an increase in the risk factor that is included in the discount rate used to calculate the discounted cash flows.
Based on the step one and step two analyses, the fair value of the reporting unit was below the carrying value. As a result, the Company recorded an $82.3 million goodwill impairment charge in the second quarter of 2014 which is included in the goodwill impairment line item in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
The Company completed a qualitative assessment of any potential goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2014 for the Servicing, Insurance, Originations, and ARM reporting units. Based on the qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of the Servicing, Insurance, Originations, and ARM reporting units were less than their carrying amounts and, therefore, the Company was not required to perform the two-step goodwill impairment analysis for these reporting units.
The Company will continue to evaluate goodwill on an annual basis effective October 1, 2014 and whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as significant adverse changes in business climate or operating results, new regulatory requirements and changes in management’s business strategy, indicate that there may be a potential indicator of impairment.
13. Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Real estate owned, net
 
$
79,079

 
$
73,573

Derivative instruments
 
78,262

 
62,365

Deferred debt issuance costs
 
60,408

 
57,517

Collateral receivable on derivative instruments
 
20,460

 

Acquisition deposits (1)
 
2,232

 
175,048

Other
 
36,048

 
44,573

Total other assets
 
$
276,489

 
$
413,076

_______
(1)
Acquisition deposits at December 31, 2013 were related to the acquisitions of the EverBank net assets and a pool of Fannie Mae MSRs. Investor approvals for certain of these transactions were obtained during the six months ended June 30, 2014 . At June 30, 2014 , acquisition deposits were related to EverBank private-label MSRs pending investor consent.

35



14. Payables and Accrued Liabilities
Payables and accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Servicing rights and related advance purchases payable (1)
 
$
131,214

 
$
12,741

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
82,434

 
55,174

Payables to insurance carriers
 
79,551

 
69,489

Employee-related liabilities
 
67,015

 
90,788

Curtailment liability
 
60,362

 
53,905

Originations liability
 
55,216

 
50,042

Derivative instruments
 
28,474

 
5,882

Uncertain tax positions
 
21,034

 
20,550

Acquisition related escrow funds payable to sellers
 
15,942

 
19,620

Accrued interest payable
 
15,573

 
18,416

Servicing transfer payables
 
6,741

 
14,167

Insurance premium cancellation reserve
 
6,589

 
7,135

Collateral payable on derivative instruments
 
1,587

 
19,148

Contingent earn-out payments
 

 
5,900

Other
 
50,550

 
51,182

Total payables and accrued liabilities
 
$
622,282

 
$
494,139

_______
(1) The increase is related primarily to the acquisition of MSRs from EverBank and an affiliate of a national bank for which the Company obtained GSE investor approval for transfer of servicing during the six months ended June 30, 2014 .
15. Servicing Advance Liabilities
Servicing advance liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement
 
$
928,873

 
$
903,381

Receivables Loan Agreement
 
64,387

 
67,905

Indenture Agreement
 
36,936

 

Revolving Credit Agreement
 
10,245

 

Total servicing advance liabilities
 
$
1,040,441

 
$
971,286

Servicing Advance Agreements
The Company's subsidiaries have servicing advance facilities with several lenders and an Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae which, in each case, are used to fund certain principal and interest, servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of certain of the Company's subsidiaries under certain servicing agreements. The servicing advance facilities and the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement had an aggregate capacity amount of $1.2 billion at June 30, 2014 . The interest rates on these facilities and the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement are primarily based on LIBOR plus between 1.25% and 5.5% and have various expiration dates through July 2015 . Payments on the amounts due under these agreements are paid from the recoveries or repayment by third party borrowers of underlying advances made by the Company's subsidiaries. Accordingly, repayment of the facilities and amounts due under the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement are dependent on the recoveries or repayments by third party borrowers that are received on the underlying advances associated with the agreements. The servicing advance facilities had $130.4 million of collateral pledged by the Company's subsidiaries under these agreements at June 30, 2014 .

Green Tree Servicing's Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae is used exclusively to fund certain principal and interest, servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of Green Tree Servicing under its Fannie Mae servicing

36



agreements. The Fannie Mae Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement expires on March 31, 2015 . If not renewed, there will be no additional funding by Fannie Mae of new advances under the agreement. In addition, collections recovered during the 18 months following the expiration of the agreement are to be remitted to Fannie Mae to settle any remaining outstanding balance due under such agreement. Upon expiration of the 18 month period, any remaining balance would become due and payable.

The Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae also includes certain “Stop Events,” such as: (i) the failure of Green Tree Servicing to comply with the terms of the agreement; (ii) the failure of Green Tree Servicing to be an approved Fannie Mae servicer; and (iii) the occurrence of an event of default under Green Tree Servicing’s mortgage selling and servicing contract or any master agreement with Fannie Mae which has not been waived by Fannie Mae or cured as may be allowed under the applicable agreement. Fannie Mae may also declare a “Stop Event” 120 days after providing Green Tree Servicing with written notice of its intent to do so. Were a Stop Event to occur and not be waived by Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae would have the option to terminate the Servicing Advance Reimbursement Agreement. In the event Fannie Mae elected to terminate the Servicing Advance Reimbursement Agreement, collections recovered during the 18 months following the occurrence of the Stop Event would be required to be remitted to Fannie Mae to settle any remaining outstanding balance due under such agreement. Upon expiration of the 18 month period, any remaining balance would become due and payable.

The servicing advance agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants most sensitive to the Company’s operating results and financial position are the requirements that certain of its subsidiaries maintain minimum tangible net worth, indebtedness to tangible net worth and minimum liquidity. During the first quarter of 2014, the Receivables Loan Agreement was amended to remove the covenant relating to the Company's requirement to maintain a minimum annual net cash provided by operating activities and to add other customary financial covenants, including indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity. The Company's subsidiaries were in compliance with these financial covenants at June 30, 2014.
16. Warehouse Borrowings
The Company's subsidiaries enter into master repurchase agreements with lenders providing warehouse facilities. The warehouse facilities are primarily used to fund the origination of forward loans and reverse loans. The facilities had an aggregate funding capacity of $2.3 billion at June 30, 2014 and are secured by certain forward and reverse loans. The interest rates on the facilities are primarily based on LIBOR plus between 2.10% and 3.25% , in some cases are subject to a LIBOR floor or other minimum rates, and have various expiration dates through July 2015 . The facilities are secured by $1.2 billion in unpaid principal balance of residential loans at June 30, 2014 .
All of the Company’s subsidiaries' master repurchase agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants most sensitive to the Company’s operating results and financial position are minimum tangible net worth requirements, indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity and profitability requirements.
At June 30, 2014 , absent a waiver received from its counterparty, RMS would not have been in compliance with its minimum profitability covenant contained in one of its master repurchase agreements. In July 2014, RMS obtained waivers of compliance effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and the quarters ending September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The waiver of compliance for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 waived certain rights and remedies that otherwise would have been available under the master repurchase agreement and confirmed that no default or event of default had occurred. The waiver of compliance for the quarters ending September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 are conditioned on RMS being in compliance with all other covenants set forth in the master repurchase agreement and related documents. So long as RMS is in compliance with all other covenants within the master repurchase agreement and related documents, the waiver of compliance waives certain rights and remedies that otherwise would have been available under the master repurchase agreement and confirms that no default or event of default had occurred.  As a result of the waiver obtained by RMS relating to the quarter ended June 30, 2014, RMS was in compliance with its financial covenants at June 30, 2014.

37



17. Share-Based Compensation
During the six months ended June 30, 2014 , the Company granted performance shares of 482,228 that contained a market-based performance condition in addition to a service component. These performance shares vest at the end of the performance period, or December 31, 2016 , and the shares ultimately awarded will be based upon the performance percentage, which can range from 0% to 200% of the target performance award grant. The performance shares ultimately awarded upon vesting are based on the percentile rank of the Company's TSR relative to the distribution of TSRs of peer group companies. TSR is measured based on a comparison of the average closing price for the twenty trading days immediately prior to March 24, 2014, or the first day of the performance period, and the average closing price for the last twenty trading days of the performance period. TSR will include the effect of dividends paid during the performance period. The weighted-average fair value of these performance shares at their grant date was $34.75 and was estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model that included valuation inputs for expected volatility of 47% , risk free interest rate of 0.83% and no dividend yield. Also during the period, the Company granted 202,464 RSUs that vest over three years based upon a service condition. The weighted-average grant date fair value of $28.14 for these awards was based on the average of the high and the low market prices of the Company's stock on the date of grant.
During the three months ended June 30 2014, the Company granted 67,507 options that cliff vest in three years based upon a service condition and have a ten year contractual term. The fair value of the stock options of $10.05 was based on the estimate of fair value on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and related assumptions. Also during this period, the Company issued 30,898 shares of fully vested common stock to its non-employee directors. The fair value of the common stock of $29.45 was based on the average of the high and low market prices on the date of issuance. The Company's share-based compensation expense has been reflected in salaries and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
18. Income Taxes
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded an impairment of goodwill related to the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit. This goodwill is not deductible for tax and as such, no tax benefit was recorded for this impairment. For the second quarter of 2014, the Company calculated the tax benefit related to loss before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2014 based on its estimated annual effective tax rate which takes into account all expected ordinary activity for the 2014 year. Due to the significant nature of the non-deductible expense related to the impairment of goodwill compared to expected ordinary income for the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company's estimated annual effective tax rate for the year is approximately 119% . This effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of the non-deductible goodwill impairment as well as the impact of state taxes. As the Company reports income tax expense (benefit) on an interim basis using an estimated annual effective tax rate, the expected tax rate for the remainder of 2014 is anticipated to approximate the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2014 of 119% .

38



19. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computations shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Basic earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
(12,929
)
 
$
143,232

 
$
4,448

 
$
170,981

Less: Net income allocated to unvested participating securities
 

 
(2,351
)
 
(34
)
 
(2,831
)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator)
 
$
(12,929
)
 
$
140,881

 
$
4,414

 
$
168,150

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (denominator)
 
37,673

 
36,925

 
37,552

 
36,902

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share
 
$
(0.34
)
 
$
3.82

 
$
0.12

 
$
4.56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
(12,929
)
 
$
143,232

 
$
4,448

 
$
170,981

Less: Net income allocated to unvested participating securities
 

 
(2,310
)
 
(33
)
 
(2,778
)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator)
 
$
(12,929
)
 
$
140,922

 
$
4,415

 
$
168,203

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
 
37,673

 
36,925

 
37,552

 
36,902

Add: Effect of dilutive stock options, non-participating securities, and convertible notes
 

 
660

 
522

 
711

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding (denominator)
 
37,673

 
37,585

 
38,074

 
37,613

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
 
$
(0.34
)
 
$
3.75

 
$
0.12

 
$
4.47

A portion of the Company’s unvested RSUs are considered participating securities. During periods of net income, the calculation of earnings per share for common stock is adjusted to exclude the income attributable to the participating securities from the numerator and exclude the dilutive impact of those shares from the denominator. During periods of net loss, no effect is given to the participating securities because they do not share in the losses of the Company.
The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share does not include 8.0 million and 5.9 million shares for the three months ended June 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 6.3 million and 5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, because their effect would have been antidilutive. The Convertible Notes are antidilutive when calculating earnings (loss) per share when the Company's average stock price is less than $58.80 . Upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, the Company may pay or deliver, at its option, cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock. It is the Company’s intent to settle all conversions through combination settlement, which involves repayment of an amount of cash equal to the principal amount and any excess of conversion value over the principal amount in shares of common stock.

39



20. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
The Company’s supplemental disclosures of cash flow information are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
 
$
154,843

 
$
127,802

Cash paid (received) for taxes
 
(17,801
)
 
55,444

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
 
 
 
 
Servicing rights capitalized upon sales of loans
 
98,167

 
37,595

Real estate owned acquired through foreclosure
 
59,484

 
60,955

Residential loans originated to finance the sale of real estate owned
 
30,057

 
34,032

Acquisition of servicing rights
 
83,868

 
14,083

21. Segment Reporting
Management has organized the Company into six reportable segments based primarily on its services as follows:
Servicing — consists of operations that perform servicing for third-party investors in forward loans, as well as for the Loans and Residuals segment and for the Non-Residual Trusts reflected in the Other non-reportable segments.
Originations — consists of operations that originate and purchase forward loans that are sold to third parties with servicing rights generally retained.
Reverse Mortgage — consists of operations that purchase and originate reverse loans that are securitized but remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for secured borrowings. This segment also performs servicing for third-party investors in reverse loans and provides other ancillary services for the reverse mortgage market, such as real estate owned property management and disposition.
Asset Receivables Management — performs collections of post charge-off deficiency balances for its own portfolio and on behalf of third-party securitization trusts and other asset owners.
Insurance — provides voluntary insurance for residential loan borrowers and lender-placed hazard insurance for investors, if permitted under applicable laws and regulations, as well as other ancillary products, through the Company’s insurance agency for a commission.
Loans and Residuals — consists of the assets and mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts and the unencumbered residential loan portfolio and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward loans.
In order to reconcile the financial results for the Company’s reportable segments to the consolidated results, the Company has presented the revenue and expenses of the Non-Residual Trusts and other non-reportable operating segments, as well as certain corporate expenses that have not been allocated to the business segments, in Other. Intersegment servicing revenues and expenses have been eliminated. Intersegment revenues are recognized on the same basis of accounting as such revenue is recognized on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

40



Presented in the tables below are the Company’s financial results by reportable segment reconciled to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Consolidated
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees (1)
 
$
126,640

 
$

 
$
8,777

 
$
10,760

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(5,201
)
 
$
140,976

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
144,611

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
144,611

Interest income on loans
 

 

 

 

 

 
34,218

 

 

 
34,218

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 

 

 
26,936

 

 

 

 

 

 
26,936

Insurance revenue
 

 

 

 

 
19,806

 

 

 

 
19,806

Other revenues (2)
 
1,157

 
5,688

 
3,005

 
1,461

 
242

 
1

 
35,612

 

 
47,166

Total revenues
 
127,797

 
150,299

 
38,718

 
12,221

 
20,048

 
34,219

 
35,612

 
(5,201
)
 
413,713

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Interest expense
 
10,619

 
6,627

 
775

 

 

 
19,860

 
36,809

 

 
74,690

Depreciation and amortization
 
8,979

 
4,757

 
2,302

 
1,213

 
1,130

 

 
10

 

 
18,391

Goodwill impairment
 

 

 
82,269

 

 

 

 

 

 
82,269

Other expenses, net
 
159,583

 
74,569

 
40,003

 
6,182

 
7,975

 
5,985

 
2,725

 
(5,201
)
 
291,821

Total expenses
 
179,181

 
85,953

 
125,349

 
7,395

 
9,105

 
25,845

 
39,544

 
(5,201
)
 
467,171

OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Other net fair value gains (losses)
 
(167
)
 

 

 

 

 
(905
)
 
2,604

 

 
1,532

Total other gains (losses)
 
(167
)
 

 

 

 

 
(905
)
 
2,604

 

 
1,532

Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
(51,551
)
 
$
64,346

 
$
(86,631
)
 
$
4,826

 
$
10,943

 
$
7,469

 
$
(1,328
)
 
$

 
$
(51,926
)
__________
(1)
The Company’s Servicing and Asset Receivables Management segments include net servicing revenue and fees of $5.0 million and $0.2 million , respectively, associated with intercompany activity with the Originations and Loans and Residuals segments and Other non-reportable segment.
(2)
Other revenues for the Company's Other non-reportable segment includes $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned in connection with the investment management of a fund. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on this transaction.



41




 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Consolidated
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees (1)
 
$
287,466

 
$

 
$
16,387

 
$
19,806

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(9,891
)
 
$
313,768

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
248,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
248,645

Interest income on loans
 

 

 

 

 

 
68,640

 

 

 
68,640

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 

 

 
44,172

 

 

 

 

 

 
44,172

Insurance revenue
 

 

 

 

 
43,194

 

 

 

 
43,194

Other revenues (2)
 
9,711

 
10,868

 
6,027

 
1,461

 
246

 
3

 
36,926

 

 
65,242

Total revenues
 
297,177

 
259,513

 
66,586

 
21,267

 
43,440

 
68,643

 
36,926

 
(9,891
)
 
783,661

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
21,032

 
13,460

 
1,634

 

 

 
40,163

 
73,250

 

 
149,539

Depreciation and amortization
 
17,684

 
9,752

 
4,751

 
2,515

 
2,313

 

 
20

 

 
37,035

Goodwill impairment
 

 

 
82,269

 

 

 

 

 

 
82,269

Other expenses, net
 
275,900

 
151,745

 
74,363

 
11,427

 
15,517

 
9,609

 
8,138

 
(9,891
)
 
536,808

Total expenses
 
314,616

 
174,957

 
163,017

 
13,942

 
17,830

 
49,772

 
81,408

 
(9,891
)
 
805,651

OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other net fair value gains (losses)
 
(341
)
 

 

 

 

 
(1,147
)
 
517

 

 
(971
)
Total other gains (losses)
 
(341
)
 

 

 

 

 
(1,147
)
 
517

 

 
(971
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
(17,780
)
 
$
84,556

 
$
(96,431
)
 
$
7,325

 
$
25,610

 
$
17,724

 
$
(43,965
)
 
$

 
$
(22,961
)
__________
(1)
The Company’s Servicing and Asset Receivables Management segments include net servicing revenue and fees of $9.6 million and $0.3 million , respectively, associated with intercompany activity with the Originations and Loans and Residuals segments and Other non-reportable segment.
(2)
Other revenues for the Company's Other non-reportable segment includes $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned in connection with the investment management of a fund. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on this transaction.



42



 
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Consolidated
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees (1)
 
$
244,432

 
$

 
$
6,624

 
$
11,102

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(4,852
)
 
$
257,306

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
235,699

 
250

 

 

 

 

 

 
235,949

Interest income on loans
 

 

 

 

 

 
36,796

 

 

 
36,796

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 

 

 
26,731

 

 

 

 

 

 
26,731

Insurance revenue
 

 

 

 

 
18,050

 

 

 

 
18,050

Other revenues
 
457

 
15,527

 
2,366

 
69

 
6

 
1

 
2,706

 

 
21,132

Total revenues
 
244,889

 
251,226

 
35,971

 
11,171

 
18,056

 
36,797

 
2,706

 
(4,852
)
 
595,964

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Interest expense
 
5,166

 
8,600

 
2,166

 

 

 
21,800

 
30,558

 

 
68,290

Depreciation and amortization
 
9,445

 
2,689

 
2,691

 
1,614

 
1,168

 

 
7

 

 
17,614

Other expenses, net
 
116,914

 
94,058

 
40,931

 
5,722

 
7,934

 
4,813

 
7,625

 
(4,852
)
 
273,145

Total expenses
 
131,525

 
105,347

 
45,788

 
7,336

 
9,102

 
26,613

 
38,190

 
(4,852
)
 
359,049

OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Other net fair value gains (losses)
 
(179
)
 

 

 

 

 
566

 
1,269

 

 
1,656

Total other gains (losses)
 
(179
)
 

 

 

 

 
566

 
1,269

 

 
1,656

Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
113,185

 
$
145,879

 
$
(9,817
)
 
$
3,835

 
$
8,954

 
$
10,750

 
$
(34,215
)
 
$

 
$
238,571

__________
(1)
The Company’s Servicing and Asset Receivables Management segments include net servicing revenue and fees of $4.7 million and $0.1 million , respectively, associated with intercompany activity with the Loans and Residuals segment and Other non-reportable segment.


43



 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Eliminations
 
Total
Consolidated
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees (1)
 
$
369,559

 
$

 
$
13,372

 
$
21,192

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(9,808
)
 
$
394,315

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
309,761

 
4,633

 

 

 

 

 

 
314,394

Interest income on loans
 

 

 

 

 

 
73,694

 

 

 
73,694

Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 

 

 
63,519

 

 

 

 

 

 
63,519

Insurance revenue
 

 

 

 

 
35,584

 

 

 

 
35,584

Other revenues
 
919

 
17,524

 
5,311

 
133

 
13

 
4

 
5,122

 
(39
)
 
28,987

Total revenues
 
370,478

 
327,285

 
86,835

 
21,325

 
35,597

 
73,698

 
5,122

 
(9,847
)
 
910,493

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
7,576

 
9,306

 
5,695

 

 

 
44,096

 
55,759

 

 
122,432

Depreciation and amortization
 
18,302

 
4,366

 
5,414

 
3,370

 
2,482

 

 
13

 

 
33,947

Other expenses, net
 
208,962

 
133,475

 
73,454

 
11,752

 
16,442

 
10,643

 
24,533

 
(9,847
)
 
469,414

Total expenses
 
234,840

 
147,147

 
84,563

 
15,122

 
18,924

 
54,739

 
80,305

 
(9,847
)
 
625,793

OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other net fair value gains (losses)
 
(424
)
 

 

 

 

 
404

 
415

 

 
395

Total other gains (losses)
 
(424
)
 

 

 

 

 
404

 
415

 

 
395

Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
135,214

 
$
180,138

 
$
2,272

 
$
6,203

 
$
16,673

 
$
19,363

 
$
(74,768
)
 
$

 
$
285,095

__________
(1)
The Company’s Servicing and Asset Receivables Management segments include net servicing revenue and fees of $9.6 million and $0.2 million , respectively, associated with intercompany activity with the Loans and Residuals segment and Other non-reportable segment.

22.    Capital Requirements
The Company's subsidiaries are required to maintain regulatory compliance with GSE and other agency and state programs as well as investor requirements, some of which are financial covenants related to minimum levels of net worth and other financial requirements. To the extent that these mandatory capital requirements are not met, the Company’s subsidiaries' selling and servicing agreements could be terminated.
Due to the accounting treatment for reverse loans as secured borrowings when transferred, RMS has obtained an indefinite waiver for certain of these requirements from Ginnie Mae and a waiver through July 2015 from Fannie Mae. In addition, the Company has provided a guarantee whereby the Company guarantees the performance and obligations of RMS under the Ginnie Mae HMBS Program. In the event that the Company fails to honor this guarantee, Ginnie Mae could terminate RMS’ status as a qualified issuer of HMBS as well as take other actions permitted by law that could impact the operations of RMS, including the termination or suspension of RMS’ servicing rights associated with reverse loans guaranteed by Ginnie Mae HMBS. Ginnie Mae has continued to affirm RMS’ current commitment authority to issue HMBS.
The Company has also provided guarantees dated May 31, 2013 for RMS and March 17, 2014 for Green Tree Servicing.  Pursuant to the RMS guarantee, the Company agreed to guarantee all of the obligations required to be performed or paid by RMS under RMS's mortgage selling and servicing contract or any other agreement between Fannie Mae and RMS relating to mortgage loans or participation interests that RMS delivers or has delivered to Fannie Mae or services or has serviced for, or on behalf of, Fannie Mae. RMS does not currently sell loans to Fannie Mae. Pursuant to the Green Tree Servicing guarantee, the Company agreed to guarantee all of the servicing obligations required to be performed or paid by Green Tree Servicing under Green Tree Servicing's mortgage selling and servicing agreement, the Fannie Mae selling and servicing guides, or any other agreement between Fannie Mae and Green Tree Servicing. The Company also agreed to guarantee all selling representations and warranties Green Tree Servicing has assumed, or may in the future assume, in connection with Green Tree Servicing's purchase of mortgage servicing rights related to Fannie Mae loans. The Company does not guarantee Green Tree Servicing's obligations relating to the selling representations and warranties made or assumed by Green Tree Servicing in connection with the sale and/or securitization of mortgage loans to and/or by Fannie Mae.  
After taking into account the waivers described above, all of the Company' subsidiaries were in compliance with all of their capital requirements at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 .

44



23. Commitments and Contingencies
Letter of Credit Reimbursement Obligation
As part of an agreement to service the loans in 11 securitization trusts, the Company has an obligation to reimburse a third party for the final $165.0 million drawn under LOCs issued by such third party as credit enhancements to such 11 securitization trust. The total amount available on these LOCs for all 11 securitization trusts was $268.6 million at June 30, 2014 . The securitization trusts will draw on these LOCs if there are insufficient cash flows from the underlying collateral to pay the debt holders of the securitization trusts. Based on the Company’s estimates of the underlying performance of the collateral in the securitization trusts, the Company does not expect that the final $165.0 million of capacity under the LOCs will be drawn and, therefore, no liability for the fair value of this obligation has been recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, although actual performance may differ from this estimate in the future.
Mandatory Clean-Up Call Obligation
The Company is obligated to exercise the mandatory clean-up call obligations assumed as part of an agreement to acquire the rights to service the loans in the Non-Residual Trusts. The Company expects to call these securitizations beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019 . The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the respective call dates is $417.9 million .
Unfunded Commitments
Reverse Mortgage Segment
The Company had floating-rate reverse loans in which the borrowers have additional borrowing capacity of $903.8 million and similar commitments on fixed-rate reverse loans of $2.0 million at June 30, 2014 . This additional borrowing capacity is primarily in the form of undrawn lines-of-credit, with the balance available on a scheduled or unscheduled payment basis. The Company also had short-term commitments to lend $78.9 million and commitments to purchase and sell loans totaling $7.0 million and $98.0 million , respectively, at June 30, 2014 .
Originations Segment
The Company had short-term commitments to lend $3.4 billion and commitments to purchase loans totaling $11.6 million at June 30, 2014 . In addition, the Company has commitments to sell $3.9 billion and purchase $504.7 million in mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2014 .
Charged-off Loans
On May 16, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire a portfolio of charged-off loans. Under the agreement, the seller may require the Company to acquire additional accounts with a maximum value of $7.0 million initially through September 9, 2014 and for each four month period thereafter. The agreement may be terminated for convenience subsequent to September 9, 2014 with a 60 day written notice. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on this portfolio acquisition.  
Mortgage Origination Contingencies
The Company sells substantially all of its originated or purchased forward loans into the secondary market for securitization or to private investors as whole loans. The Company sells conventional conforming and government-backed forward loans through agency-sponsored securitizations in which mortgage-backed securities are created and sold to third-party investors. The Company also sells non-conforming forward loans to private investors. In doing so, representations and warranties regarding certain attributes of the loans are made to the third-party investor. Subsequent to the sale, if it is determined that the loans sold are in breach of these representations or warranties, the Company generally has an obligation to either: (i) repurchase the loan for the unpaid principal balance, accrued interest, and related advances; (ii) indemnify the purchaser; or (iii) make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of the loan. The Company’s credit loss may be reduced by any recourse it has to correspondent lenders that, in turn, have sold such residential loans to the Company and breached similar or other representations and warranties.
The Company’s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits of exposure. The current unpaid principal balance of loans sold by the Company to date represents the maximum exposure to repurchases related to representations and warranties.
The Company’s obligations vary based upon the nature of the repurchase demand and the current status of the residential loan. The Company’s estimate of the liability associated with representations and warranties exposure was $10.3 million at June 30, 2014 and is included in originations liability as part of payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

45



Litigation and Regulatory Matters
The Company, its subsidiaries and current and former officers and employees are involved in litigation, investigations and claims arising out of the normal conduct of its business. The Company estimates and accrues liabilities resulting from such matters based on a variety of factors, including outstanding legal claims, proposed settlements and assessments of pending or threatened litigation. These accruals are recorded when the costs are determined to be probable and are reasonably estimable. Facts and circumstances may change that could cause the actual liabilities to exceed the accrued amounts or that may require adjustments to the recorded liability balances in the future. The Company believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of reserves established, for the normal course of business proceedings, is from $0 to approximately $6.0 million at June 30, 2014.
The following is a description of certain litigation and regulatory matters.
In response to a CID from the FTC issued in November 2010 and a CID from the CFPB in September 2012, Green Tree Servicing has produced documents and other information concerning a wide range of its loan servicing operations. On October 7, 2013, the CFPB notified Green Tree Servicing that the CFPB’s staff was considering recommending that the CFPB take action against Green Tree Servicing for alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. On February 20, 2014, the FTC and CFPB staff advised Green Tree Servicing that they had sought authority to bring an enforcement action and negotiate a resolution related to alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. The Company’s understanding is that the CFPB staff now has authority to commence an action against Green Tree Servicing and that the FTC staff has authority to negotiate and would need further FTC approval to file such an action. In April 2014, Green Tree Servicing began discussions with the FTC and CFPB staffs to determine if a settlement of the proposed action can be achieved. Those discussions are ongoing. The FTC and CFPB staffs have indicated that as part of a settlement, they will seek injunctive relief in relation to Green Tree Servicing’s business practices, civil money penalties and equitable monetary relief of an undetermined amount. The Company is unable to predict whether a settlement of the proposed action can be achieved on terms acceptable to it, the FTC and the CFPB, and cannot predict the final terms of any such settlement. The Company cannot provide any assurance that the FTC and/or CFPB will not take legal action against the Company or that the allegations made by the FTC and/or CFPB or the commencement, settlement or other outcome of any such action will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation, business, business practices, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
On October 2, 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the HUD Office of Inspector General requesting documents and other information concerning (i) the curtailment of interest payments on HECMs serviced or sub-serviced by RMS and (ii) RMS’s contractual arrangements with a third-party vendor for the management and disposition of real estate owned properties. The Company has produced certain materials to HUD in response to the subpoena. In May 2014, the Department of Justice informed the Company that it is working with HUD in investigating possible violations by RMS of federal law, including the False Claims Act. The Company is cooperating with this investigation and has been in contact with representatives of the Department of Justice and HUD. Resolutions of investigations or lawsuits, or findings of liability, under the False Claims Act may result in potentially significant financial consequences, including the payment of up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government and civil penalties. The Company cannot provide any assurance as to the outcome of the investigations by the Department of Justice and HUD or that any consequences will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
On March 7, 2014, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Mark O’Brien, Charles Cauthen, Denmar Dixon, Marc Helm and Robert Yeary captioned Beck v. Walter Investment Management Corp., et al., No. 1:14-cv-20880 (S.D. Fla.). On July 7, 2014, an amended class action complaint was filed. The amended complaint names as defendants the Company, Mark O’Brien, Charles Cauthen, Denmar Dixon, Keith Anderson, Brian Corey and Mark Helm, and is captioned Thorpe, et al. v. Walter Investment Management Corp., et al. No. 1:14-cv-20880-UU. The amended complaint asserts federal securities law claims against the Company and the individual defendants under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Additional claims are asserted against the individual defendants under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The amended complaint alleges that between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014 the Company and the individual defendants made material misstatements or omissions relating to the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting, the processes and procedures for compliance with applicable regulatory and legal requirements by Green Tree Servicing (including certain of the Company’s business practices that are being reviewed by the FTC and the CFPB), the liabilities associated with the Company’s acquisition of RMS and RMS's internal controls. The complaint seeks class certification and an unspecified amount of damages on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s securities between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014. The Company cannot provide any assurance as to the disposition of the complaint or that such disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

46



As various federal and state regulators continue to investigate perceived causes and consequences of the financial crisis, the Company expects that it may receive general information requests from other agencies. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company met with a working group representing the attorneys general and regulators of several states as well as representatives of the Office of the United States Trustee to discuss the business practices of Green Tree Servicing. At the meeting, the Company was informed of concerns about various loan servicing practices, including certain bankruptcy-related matters. The Company understands that members of this group have initiated an investigation of Green Tree Servicing’s loan servicing practices and expects to receive a CID in the near future. The Company cannot predict the timing, direction or outcome of any such investigations.
The Company is, and expects that it will continue to be, involved in litigation, arbitration, investigations, and claims in the ordinary course of business, including purported class actions and other legal proceedings challenging whether certain of its residential loan servicing practices and other aspects of its business, comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements. These legal proceedings include, among other things, putative class action claims concerning "force-placed insurance," the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and other federal and state laws and statutes. The outcome of these legal proceedings is uncertain, and it is possible that adverse results in such proceedings (which could include penalties, punitive damages and injunctive relief affecting the Company's business practices) and the terms of any settlements of such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, cooperating in, defending and resolving these legal proceedings may consume significant amounts of management time and attention and could cause the Company to incur substantial legal, consulting and other expenses and to change the Company's business practices, even in cases where there is no determination that the Company's conduct failed to meet applicable legal or regulatory requirements.
Regulatory Contingencies
The Company services loans originated and securitized by the Company or one of its subsidiaries and also services loans on behalf of securitization trusts or other investors. The Company’s servicing obligations are set forth in industry regulations established by HUD and the FHA and in servicing and sub-servicing agreements with the applicable counterparties, such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other investors. Both the regulations and the servicing agreements provide that the servicer may be liable for failure to perform its servicing obligations and further provide remedies for certain servicer breaches.
Subsequent to the completion of the acquisition of RMS, the Company discovered a failure by RMS to record certain liabilities to HUD, FHA, and/or investors related to servicing errors by RMS. FHA regulations provide that servicers meet a series of event-specific timeframes during the default, foreclosure, conveyance, and mortgage insurance claim cycles. Failure to timely meet any processing deadline may stop the accrual of debenture interest otherwise payable in satisfaction of a claim under the FHA mortgage insurance contract and the servicer may be responsible to HUD for debenture interest that is not self-curtailed by the servicer, or for making the investor whole for any interest curtailed by FHA due to not meeting the required event-specific timeframes. The Company had a curtailment obligation liability of $60.4 million at June 30, 2014 related to the foregoing which reflects management’s best estimate of the probable lifetime claim. The curtailment liability is recorded in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company assumed $46.0 million of this liability through the acquisition of RMS, which resulted in a corresponding offset to goodwill and deferred tax assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 , the Company recorded a provision related to the curtailment liability of $0.8 million and collected $5.2 million from a prior servicer. The Company has potential financial statement exposure for an additional $120.7 million related to similar claims, which are reasonably possible, but which the Company believes are the responsibility of third parties (e.g., prior servicers and/or investors). The Company’s potential exposure to this additional risk relates to the possibility that such third parties may claim that the Company is responsible for the servicing liability or that the Company exacerbated an existing failure by the third party. The actual amount, if any, of this exposure is difficult to estimate and requires significant management judgment as curtailment obligations are an emerging industry issue. Moreover, the Company is and will continue to pursue mitigation efforts to reduce both the direct exposure and the reasonably possible third-party-related exposure.
Transactions with Walter Energy
The Company was part of the Walter Energy consolidated group prior to the spin-off from Walter Energy, the principal agent, on April 17, 2009 . As such, the Company is jointly and severally liable with Walter Energy for any final taxes, interest, and/or penalties owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group during the time that the Company was a part of the Walter Energy consolidated group. However, in connection with the spin-off of the Company’s business from Walter Energy, the Company and Walter Energy entered into a Tax Separation Agreement dated April 17, 2009 , pursuant to which Walter Energy is responsible for the payment of all federal income taxes (including any interest or penalties applicable thereto) of the consolidated group. Nonetheless, to the extent that Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, the Company could be responsible for any unpaid amounts including, according to Walter Energy’s most recent public filing on Form 10-Q, those relating to the following:
The IRS has filed a proof of claim for a substantial amount of taxes, interest, and penalties with respect to fiscal years ended August 31, 1983 through May 31, 1994. The public filing goes on to disclose that issues have been litigated in bankruptcy

47



court and that an opinion was issued by the court in June 2010 as to the remaining disputed issues. The filing further states that the amounts initially asserted by the IRS do not reflect the subsequent resolution of various issues through settlements or concessions by the parties. Walter Energy believes that any financial exposure with respect to those issues that have not been resolved or settled by the Proof of Claim is limited to interest and possible penalties and the amount of tax assessed has been offset by tax reductions in future years. All of the issues in the Proof of Claim, which have not been settled or conceded, have been litigated before the Bankruptcy Court and are subject to appeal, but only at the conclusion of the entire adversary proceedings.
The IRS completed its audit of Walter Energy’s federal income tax returns for the years ended May 31, 2000 through December 31, 2005. The IRS issued 30 -Day Letters to Walter Energy proposing changes to tax for these tax years which Walter Energy has protested. Walter Energy’s filing states that the disputed issues in this audit period are similar to the issues remaining in the above-referenced dispute and therefore Walter Energy believes that its financial exposure for these years is limited to interest and possible penalties.
While the IRS had completed its audit of Walter Energy’s federal income tax returns for the years 2006 to 2008 and issued 30 -Day Letters to Walter Energy proposing changes to tax for these tax years which Walter Energy has protested, the IRS reopened the audit of these periods in 2012. Walter Energy’s filing states that the disputed issues in this audit period are similar to the issue remaining in the above-referenced dispute and therefore Walter Energy believes that its financial exposure for these years is limited to interest and possible penalties.
Walter Energy reports that the IRS is conducting an audit of Walter Energy’s tax returns filed for 2009 through 2012. Since examination is ongoing, Walter Energy cannot estimate the amount of any resulting tax deficiency or overpayment, if any.
Walter Energy believes that all of its current and prior tax filing positions have substantial merit and intends to defend vigorously any tax claims asserted and it believes that it has sufficient accruals to address any claims, including interest and penalties, and as a result, believes that any potential difference between actual losses and costs incurred and the amounts accrued would be immaterial.
Under the terms of the tax separation agreement between the Company and Walter Energy dated April 17, 2009, Walter Energy is responsible for the payment of all federal income taxes (including any interest or penalties applicable thereto) of the consolidated group, which includes the aforementioned claims of the IRS. However, to the extent that Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, the Company could be responsible for any unpaid amounts. The Tax Separation Agreement also provides that Walter Energy is responsible for the preparation and filing of any tax returns for the consolidated group for the periods when the Company was part of the Walter Energy consolidated group. This arrangement may result in conflicts between Walter Energy and the Company. In addition, the spin-off of the Company from Walter Energy was intended to qualify as a tax-free spin-off under Section 355 of the Code. The Tax Separation Agreement provides generally that if the spin-off is determined not to be tax-free pursuant to Section 355 of the Code, any taxes imposed on Walter Energy or a Walter Energy shareholder as a result of such determination, or Distribution Taxes, which are the result of the acts or omissions of Walter Energy or its affiliates, will be the responsibility of Walter Energy. However, should Distribution Taxes result from the acts or omissions of the Company or its affiliates, such Distribution Taxes will be the responsibility of the Company. The Tax Separation Agreement goes on to provide that Walter Energy and the Company shall be jointly liable, pursuant to a designated allocation formula, for any Distribution Taxes that are not specifically allocated to Walter Energy or the Company. To the extent that Walter Energy is unable or unwilling to pay any Distribution Taxes for which it is responsible under the Tax Separation Agreement, the Company could be liable for those taxes as a result of being a member of the Walter Energy consolidated group for the year in which the spin-off occurred. The Tax Separation Agreement also provides for payments from Walter Energy in the event that an additional taxable dividend is required to cure a REIT disqualification from the determination of a shortfall in the distribution of non-REIT earnings and profits made immediately following the spin-off. As with Distribution Taxes, the Company will be responsible for this dividend if Walter Energy is unable or unwilling to pay.
Except as set forth above, the Company cannot estimate reasonably possible losses arising from commitments and contingencies.
24. Subsequent Events
Walter Capital Opportunity Corp
On July 1, 2014, the Company completed its initial funding of approximately $7.1 million of the Company's total capital commitment of $20.0 million to WCO and its related subsidiaries and entered into certain sale and assignment agreements. Under these agreements, the Company will, among other things, sell to WCO the right to receive excess servicing spread cash flows relating to certain MSRs which will be treated as financings and carried at estimated fair value with the changes in fair value recognized in current period income. The Company will retain all ancillary income associated with servicing the portfolio after receipt of a base servicing fee. The Company continues to be the servicer of the mortgage loans and provides all servicing functions, including the responsibility to make servicing advances.

48



Additionally, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Green Tree Servicing, completed an excess servicing spread sale with WCO. The excess servicing spread transaction represents the first investment made by WCO and involved the acquisition by WCO of 70% of the excess servicing spread from a pool of Green Tree Servicing mortgage servicing rights with an unpaid principal balance of $25.2 billion . The sales price of the excess servicing spread transaction was $75.4 million .
Concurrently with the first funding of WCO capital commitments, the Company's subsidiary, GTIM, and WCO entered into a management agreement pursuant to which GTIM was appointed the manager of WCO and its subsidiaries and, subject to the supervision and oversight of WCO’s board of directors, provides investment advisory and management services to WCO and administers its business activities and day-to-day operations, including providing the management team of WCO. Pursuant to the management agreement, GTIM is entitled to earn a base management fee and certain performance-based incentive fees. The management agreement has an initial four-year term, with automatic one-year renewal periods;





49



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The terms "Walter Investment," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" as used throughout this report refer to Walter Investment Management Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2014 , and with the information under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in that Annual Report on Form 10-K. Historical results and trends discussed herein and therein may not be indicative of future operation s, particularly in light of our recent acquisitions. Our results of operations and financial condition, as reflected in the accompanying con solidated financial statements and related footnotes, reflect management’s evaluation and interpretation of business conditions, changing capital market conditions, and other factors. We use certain acronyms and terms throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are defined under "Glossary of Terms" in this Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Our website can be found at www.walterinvestment.com . We make available free of charge on our website or provide a link on our website to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. To access these filings, go to our website, click on “Investor Relations” and then click on "SEC Filings". We also make available through our website other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC under the Exchange Act, including our proxy statements and reports filed by officers and directors under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as our Code of Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Resources Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compliance Committee. In addition, our website includes disclosure relating to certain non-GAAP financial measures (as defined by SEC Regulation G) that we may make public orally, telephonically, by webcast, by broadcast, or by similar means from time to time.
From time to time, we may use our website as a channel of distribution of material company information. Financial and other material information regarding the Company is routinely posted on and accessible at http://investor.walterinvestment.com .
Any information on our website or obtained through our website is not part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Our Investor Relations Department can be contacted at 3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 1100, Tampa, Florida 33607, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone (813) 421-7694.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Certain statements in this report, including matters discussed under this Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Certain of these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “may,” “should,” “will,” or other similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, and our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from future results, performance or achievements expressed in these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs, intentions and expectations. These statements are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those factors, risks and uncertainties described below and in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 under the caption “Risk Factors,” in Part II, Item 1A., “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC.
In particular (but not by way of limitation), the following important factors, risks and uncertainties could affect our future results, performance and achievements and could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
increased scrutiny and potential enforcement actions by federal and state agencies, including a pending investigation by the CFPB and the FTC, the investigation by the Department of Justice and HUD, and the investigations by the state attorneys general working group;
uncertainties related to our ability to meet increasing performance and compliance standards, such as those of the National Mortgage Settlement, and reporting obligations and increases to the cost of doing business as a result thereof;

50



uncertainties related to inquiries from government agencies into collection, foreclosure, loss mitigation, bankruptcy, loan servicing transfers and lender-placed insurance practices;
uncertainties relating to interest curtailment obligations and any related financial and litigation exposure (including exposure relating to false claims);
unexpected losses resulting from pending, threatened or unforeseen litigation, arbitration or other third-party claims against the Company;
changes in, and/or more stringent enforcement of, federal, state and local policies, laws and regulations affecting our business, including mortgage and reverse mortgage originations and servicing and lender-placed insurance;
loss of our loan servicing, loan origination, insurance agency, and collection agency licenses, or changes to our licensing requirements;
our ability to remain qualified as a GSE approved seller, servicer or component servicer, including the ability to continue to comply with the GSEs’ respective loan and selling and servicing guides;
the substantial resources (including senior management time and attention) we devote to, and the significant compliance costs we incur in connection with, regulatory compliance and regulatory examinations and inquiries, and any fines, penalties or similar payments we make in connection with resolving such matters;
our ability to earn anticipated levels of performance and incentive fees on serviced business;
the ability of our customers, under certain circumstances, to terminate our servicing and sub-servicing agreements, including agreements relating to our management and disposition of real estate owned properties for GSEs and investors;
a downgrade in our servicer ratings by one or more of the rating agencies that rate us as a residential loan servicer;
our ability to satisfy various GSE and other capital requirements applicable to our business;
uncertainties relating to the status and future role of GSEs, and the effects of any changes to the servicing compensation structure for mortgage servicers pursuant to programs of GSEs or various regulatory authorities;
changes to HAMP, HARP, the HECM program or other similar government programs;
uncertainties related to the processes for judicial and non-judicial foreclosure proceedings, including potential additional costs, delays or moratoria in the future or claims pertaining to past practices;
our ability to implement strategic initiatives, particularly as they relate to our ability to raise capital and develop new business, including acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights, the development of our originations business and the implementation of delinquency flow loan servicing programs, all of which are subject to customer demand and various third-party approvals;
risks related to our acquisitions, including our ability to successfully integrate large volumes of assets and servicing rights, as well as businesses and platforms, that we have acquired or may acquire in the future into our business, any delay or failure to realize the anticipated benefits we expect to realize from such acquisitions, and our ability to obtain approvals required to acquire and retain servicing rights and other assets in the future;
risks related to the financing incurred in connection with past or future acquisitions and operations, including our ability to achieve cash flows sufficient to carry our debt and otherwise comply with the covenants of our debt;
risks related to the high amount of leverage we utilize in the operation of our business;
our dependence upon third-party funding in order to finance certain of our businesses;
the effects of competition on our existing and potential future business, including the impact of competitors with greater financial resources and broader scopes of operation;
our ability to successfully develop our loan originations platforms;
the occurrence of anticipated growth of the specialty servicing sector and the reverse mortgage sector;
local, regional, national and global economic trends and developments in general, and local, regional and national real estate and residential mortgage market trends in particular;
continued uncertainty in the United States home sales market, including both the volume and pricing of sales, due to adverse economic conditions or otherwise;
fluctuations in interest rates and levels of mortgage originations and prepayments;
changes in regards to the rights and obligations of property owners, mortgagors and tenants;
changes in public, client or investor opinion on mortgage origination, loan servicing and debt collection practices;

51



the effect of our risk management strategies, including the management and protection of the personal and private information of our customers and mortgage holders and the protection of our information systems from third-party interference (cyber security);
changes in accounting rules and standards, which are highly complex and continuing to evolve in the forward and reverse servicing and originations sectors;
the satisfactory maintenance of effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
our continued listing on the New York Stock Exchange; and
the ability or willingness of Walter Energy, our prior parent, and other counterparties to satisfy material obligations under agreements with us.
All of the above factors, risks and uncertainties are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and may be beyond our control. New factors, risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all such factors, risks and uncertainties.
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements (including those relating to our outlook) contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore any of these statements included herein may prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved. We make no commitment to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances after the date any such statement is made, except as otherwise required under the federal securities laws. If we were in any particular instance to update or correct a forward-looking statement, investors and others should not conclude that we would make additional updates or corrections thereafter except as otherwise required under the federal securities laws.
Executive Summary
The Company
We are a fee-based services provider to the residential mortgage industry focused primarily on providing servicing for credit-sensitive forward mortgage loans and for reverse mortgage loans. According to Inside Mortgage Finance, at the end of June 2014, we were one of the top 10 mortgage servicers ranked nationally by unpaid principal balance. At June 30, 2014 , we serviced approximately 2.3 million mortgage loans with approximately $252.1 billion in unpaid principal balance. Our servicing portfolio significantly expanded throughout 2013 as a result of our servicing asset acquisitions, the most significant of which were our $126.7 billion of bulk portfolio acquisitions from ResCap and BOA in early 2013, and our other bulk and flow servicing asset acquisitions, which contributed an additional $17.4 billion to our servicing portfolio. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 , we continued to grow our forward loan portfolio with $ 37.3 billion of bulk portfolio acquisitions from EverBank and an affiliate of a national bank and $2.3 billion in other acquisitions. During the three months ended June 30, 2014 , we grew our asset receivables management business by acquiring a $57.1 million portfolio of charged-off loans, representing a substantial discount to the face value of $3.3 billion . Our business provides servicing to the forward residential loan market for several product types including agency or non-agency and first and second lien and manufactured housing loans. We focus on credit-sensitive residential mortgages, which we define as loans that are delinquent or more operationally intensive to support. We also service higher credit-quality performing forward mortgage loans.
The recent growth of our forward and reverse mortgage originations businesses has diversified our revenue base and offers various sources for replenishing the Company's portfolio of servicing assets. In 2013, we materially expanded our forward mortgage originations business concurrent with the servicing portfolio acquisition from ResCap through the purchase of its capital markets and national originations platforms. During 2013, we originated $15.9 billion of forward loans and of this amount, added $5.9 billion to our servicing portfolio through our correspondent and wholesale lending channels. The majority of the remaining originations supported our recapture and retention activities associated with our existing servicing portfolio. Through our retention and recapture activities, we assist borrowers in refinancing their loans which helps reduce runoff on our existing servicing portfolio. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 , we originated $7.9 billion of forward mortgage volume through our consumer lending and correspondent lending channels. The consumer lending channel is comprised of both our retail lending channel and retention channel. In February 2014, we exited activities associated with our mortgage wholesale channel. According to Inside Mortgage Finance, we were one of the top 20 mortgage lenders by volume through the first half of 2014.
Our reverse mortgage originations business originated and purchased $2.7 billion in unpaid principal balance of reverse mortgage volume and issued $2.9 billion in unpaid principal balance of HMBS during 2013 . For the six months ended June 30, 2014 , we originated and purchased $544.5 million in unpaid principal balance of reverse mortgage volume and issued $774.1 million in unpaid principal balance of HMBS to finance our reverse mortgage originations business.

52



We operate several other related businesses which include managing a portfolio of credit-challenged, non-conforming residential mortgage loans; an asset manager; an insurance agency serving residential loan borrowers; and a post charge-off collection agency. We manage our Company in six reportable segments: Servicing, Originations, Reverse Mortgage, Assets Receivables Management, Insurance, and Loans and Residuals. A description of the business conducted by each of these segments is provided below:
Servicing — Our Servicing segment consists of operations that perform servicing for third-party investors in forward loans, as well as our own forward loan portfolios on a fee-for-service basis.
Originations — Our Originations segment consists of operations that purchase and originate forward loans that are sold to third parties with servicing rights generally retained.
Reverse Mortgage — Our Reverse Mortgage segment consists of operations that purchase and originate HECMs that are securitized, but remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for secured borrowings referred to as HMBS related obligations. This segment also performs servicing for third-party investors in reverse loans and provides other ancillary services for the reverse mortgage market, such as real estate owned property management and disposition.
Asset Receivables Management — Our ARM segment performs collections of post charge-off deficiency balances for itself and on behalf of securitization trusts and third-party asset owners.
Insurance — Our Insurance business segment provides voluntary insurance for residential loan borrowers and lender-placed hazard insurance for investors, if permitted under applicable laws and regulations, as well as other ancillary products, through our insurance agency for a commission.
Loans and Residuals — Our Loans and Residuals segment consists of the assets and liabilities of the Residual Trusts, as well as our unencumbered residential loan portfolio and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward loans.
Other — Our Other non-reportable segments primarily consist of the assets and liabilities of the Non-Residual Trusts, corporate debt, and our investment management business.
Overview
Our profitability is dependent on our ability to generate fee revenue primarily from our servicing portfolio, as well as our adjacent originations and reverse mortgage businesses. Our Servicing segment revenue is impacted by the size and mix of our capitalized and sub-serviced portfolios and is generated through servicing of mortgage loans for investors. Net servicing revenue and fees includes changes in the fair value of MSRs carried at fair value and the amortization of all other MSRs. Our servicing fee income generation is influenced by the level and timing of MSR trades. Origination gain on sale of loans is impacted by interest rate conditions. Our Originations segment revenue, which is primarily gains on sales of loans, is impacted by the volume of loans sold into the secondary market and, to some degree, the margins earned in our various origination channels. Net gains on sales of loans include the cost of additions to the representations and warranties reserve. Our Reverse Mortgage segment is impacted by new origination volume, draws on existing loans and loan pool pricing. Our Loans and Residuals segment seeks to earn a spread from the interest income we earn on residential loans less the credit losses we incur on these loans and the interest expense we pay on the mortgage-backed debt issued to finance the loans. The net interest margin is significantly influenced by the overall size and mix of our loan portfolio and the cost of funding those assets. Insurance revenues include commissions earned by our insurance agency business and are largely impacted by the size of our servicing portfolio and regulations. Other revenues include origination fees and asset management performance fees relating to investment management of a fund.
Our results of operations are also affected by expenses such as salaries and benefits, occupancy, legal and professional fees, other operating expenses, and interest expense. The impact of recent legislation and related rules regulating the financial services sector resulted in increased legal, consulting and other professional fees. In addition, in the second quarter of 2014 , our expenses were impacted by a non-cash goodwill impairment charge. The results of goodwill impairment testing in the second quarter of 2014 indicated that the estimated fair value of our Reverse Mortgage reporting unit goodwill was less than its book value, requiring a $82.3 million non-cash charge to earnings.
We continue to pursue opportunities to bolster our servicing portfolio through acquisitions of servicing rights and subservicing contracts, while also using our originations platform to refinance and retain loans in our current servicing portfolio as well as to generate new loans that are added to the servicing portfolio. Based on our discussions with market sources and potential counterparties, we believe that banking organizations as well as non-bank mortgage origination companies continue to be interested in transferring substantial volumes of servicing rights and responsibilities to high touch servicers such as ourselves. Although during the first six months of 2014 we completed the acquisition of servicing rights related to loans with an unpaid principal balance of $39.7 billion, in the market generally bulk transfers of servicing rights and subservicing responsibilities have slowed during 2014, as the GSEs and federal and state government agencies have been reviewing the industry’s experience over the last several years with large

53



volumes of servicing transfers, increasing their scrutiny of such transfers and, in some cases, delaying or withholding approval of transfers. We expect this environment of enhanced scrutiny to continue for some time, although we expect that the GSEs and regulators will seek to update and clarify transfer guidelines during this year. In the future, we expect that our ability to add to our servicing portfolio through such transfers will depend in part upon whether we can comply with increasingly stringent transfer protocols, demonstrate high levels of compliance with regulatory and contractual servicing standards and meet potentially changing capital requirements. In addition, price competition to procure such transfers is substantial.
Financial Highlights
We recognized a net loss of $12.9 million , or $0.34 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 primarily as a result of a goodwill impairment relating to our Reverse Mortgage segment and a reduction in servicing rights carried at fair value associated with our Servicing segment. We recognized net income of $143.2 million , or $3.75 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 . The decrease in net income to a net loss was primarily due to our Servicing and Originations segments which had lower income before taxes of $164.7 million and $81.5 million , respectively, and our Reverse Mortgage segment which had a higher loss before taxes of $76.8 million , partially offset by a lower loss before taxes of $32.9 million relating to our Other non-reportable segment. The decline in income before taxes to a loss before taxes for our Servicing segment was mainly attributable to a reduction in servicing rights carried at fair value as discussed above, a higher provision on advances and larger legal fees. The decline in income before taxes for our Originations segment primarily resulted from lower net gains on sales of loans, which was due mainly to the effect of the reduction in locked volume; a shift in volume from a higher margin retention channel to a lower margin correspondent channel; and reduced fair value of servicing rights included in IRLCs and loans held for sale. T he change in mix to a lower margin correspondent channel resulted from a decline in eligible HARP borrowers from a peak in 2013 when we acquired significant servicing portfolios. Since this peak we have had a smaller number of opportunities to originate loans through our retention channel. Our Reverse Mortgage segment experienced an increase in loss before taxes primarily as a result of an impairment of goodwill. Our Other non-reportable segment recorded $34.2 million in asset management performance fees during the current quarter in connection with the investment management of a fund. These fees were collected and earned in connection with the liquidation of the fund’s investments. There were no such fees earned during the comparative prior year period.
We recognized net income of $4.4 million , or $0.12 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $171.0 million , or $4.47 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 . The decrease in net income was primarily due to our Servicing, Originations and Reverse Mortgage segments which had lower income before taxes of $153.0 million , $ 95.6 million and $98.7 million , respectively, partially offset by higher income before taxes of $8.9 million and $30.8 million relating to our Insurance segment and Other non-reportable segment, respectively. The decline in income before taxes to a loss before taxes for our Servicing segment was mainly attributable to a reduction in servicing rights carried at fair value, offset partially by higher gross revenues, net of operating expenses, resulting from growth in the servicing portfolio. These revenues included a $13.1 million benefit which resulted from the settlement of differences in views between a prior servicer and the Company on how certain fees were recognized under a contract. Our Originations segment experienced lower income before taxes primarily resulting from lower net gains on sales of loans for the reasons addressed above. Our Reverse Mortgage segment had a decline in income before taxes to a loss before taxes mainly as a result of an impairment of goodwill and lower net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations due primarily to a lower volume of new originations, offset partially by a higher volume of securitizations of borrower draws on existing reverse loans. The Insurance segment benefited from higher income before taxes due primarily to an increase in lender-placed insurance policies issued in relation to the 2013 and early 2014 bulk servicing rights acquisitions. Our Other non-reportable segment recorded $34.2 million in asset management performance fees during the current year period as addressed above. Income tax expense declined by $141.5 million primarily due to the decline in income before taxes.
Refer to the Results of Operations and Business Segment Results sections below for further information. Results for our ARM, Insurance and Loans and Residuals segments are included in the Results of Operations section as there has been no material change in these segments period over period.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that are not presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes these financial measures better reflect our business results as they remove the effect of various one-time and non-cash items. For a description of Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of our GAAP consolidated income (loss) before taxes to Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Business Segment Results sections below.

54



We recognized Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings of $114.9 million and $210.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , respectively, in comparison to $199.2 million and $295.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 , respectively. The decrease in Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings of $84.3 million and $85.8 million for the three and six month periods, respectively, was primarily attributable to the following:
Our Servicing segment had lower Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings of $15.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from higher expenses, offset partially by increased gross servicing revenues. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings was also impacted by reductions in servicing rights fair value driven by changes in market assumptions resulting in a higher realization of expected cash flows which reduced gross servicing revenues.
Our Servicing segment had higher Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings of $17.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from a larger growth in gross revenues in relation to higher expenses. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings was also impacted by a higher realization of cash flows in 2014.
Our Originations segment had lower Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings of $78.0 million and $86.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to reduced net gains on sales of loans. The decline in net gains on sales of loans for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was partially offset by lower expenses related to both lower volume and cost saving initiatives.
Our Reverse Mortgage segment had lower Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) of $19.6 million and $40.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, resulting primarily from a decline in cash gains on reverse loans mainly as a result of lower new origination volume, partially offset by a higher volume of securitizations of borrower draws on existing reverse loans.
Our Other non-reportable segment had lower Adjusted Pre-Tax Losses of $27.5 million and $15.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 in comparison to 2013 , respectively, primarily due to $34.2 million in asset management performance fees earned during the three months ended June 30, 2014 in connection with investment management of a fund as discussed above, offset partially by higher interest expense on corporate debt of $6.3 million and $17.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 in comparison to 2013 , respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA was $199.4 million and $367.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , respectively, in comparison to $262.1 million and $402.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 , respectively. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA of $62.7 million and $34.9 million for the three and six month periods, respectively, was primarily attributable to the following:
Our Servicing segment had lower Adjusted EBITDA of $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from higher expenses, offset partially by increased gross servicing revenues as discussed above.
Our Servicing segment had higher Adjusted EBITDA of $45.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , resulting primarily from a larger growth in gross revenues in relation to higher expenses.
Our Originations segment had lower Adjusted EBITDA of $80.0 million and $86.1 million due primarily to the same factors as described above for Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings.
Our Reverse Mortgage segment had lower Adjusted EBITDA of $19.4 million and $40.4 million due primarily to the same factors as described above for Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss).
Our Other non-reportable segment had higher Adjusted EBITDA of $33.8 million and $32.7 million due primarily to $34.2 million in asset management performance fees earned during the three months ended June 30, 2014 in connection with investment management of a fund as discussed above.
Our cash flows used in operating activities were $73.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 . We finished the six months ended June 30, 2014 with $303.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. Our operating cash flows increased by $2.0 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 primarily as a result of a higher volume of loans sold in relation to originated loans. In the prior year period the business substantially ramped up operations with the acquisition of the capital markets and originations platforms from ResCap on January 31, 2013 and the correspondent lending business from Ally Bank on March 1, 2013, therefore loan originations were significantly larger than volume sold. In the current year period, the relationship of loan production to volume sold normalized. In addition, during the current year period, the growth of our servicing portfolio required the use of funds for servicer and protective advances which required $ 84.5 million of cash.

55



Recent Developments
Walter Capital Opportunity Corp.
In April 2014, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we agreed to invest in WCO, a company formed to invest in WCO Target Assets, which include excess servicing spread related to MSRs, forward MSRs, forward and reverse residential whole loans, reverse MSRs (to the extent available and consistent with the real estate investment trust rules), agency mortgage backed securities and other real estate related securities and related derivatives.
We initiated the establishment of WCO (i) to facilitate our transition toward a business model in which, where appropriate and feasible, we sub-service and manage mortgage-related assets owned by third parties rather than by us, and (ii) to grow our investment management business. Although WCO is not obligated to utilize us to service its assets, we anticipate that we will have the opportunity to service some or all of such assets, subject to us and WCO agreeing on the terms of any such servicing arrangements.
We committed to invest up to $20 million in WCO, received warrants to purchase additional WCO equity and are entitled to future grants of additional warrants to purchase WCO equity. In addition, certain investment funds managed by York committed to invest up to an aggregate of $200 million in WCO and are entitled to future grants of warrants to purchase WCO equity in the future.
On July 1, 2014, the date of initial funding of WCO, we funded approximately $7.1 million of our total capital commitment while the investment funds managed by York funded approximately $70.7 million of their aggregate capital commitments. WCO used approximately $75.4 million of the total capital commitments drawn in order to fund its acquisition from our subsidiary, Green Tree Servicing, of the right to receive excess servicing spread consisting of approximately 70% of the excess cash flow, after receipt by Green Tree Servicing of a base servicing fee, generated from MSRs associated with a pool of conforming residential mortgage loans in Fannie Mae pools with a total unpaid principal balance of approximately $25.2 billion as of May 31, 2014.
Concurrently with the first funding of WCO capital commitments:
1.
our subsidiary, GTIM, and WCO entered into a management agreement pursuant to which GTIM was appointed the manager of WCO and its subsidiaries and, subject to the supervision and oversight of WCO’s board of directors, provides investment advisory and management services to WCO and administers its business activities and day-to-day operations, including providing the management team of WCO. Pursuant to the management agreement, GTIM is entitled to earn a base management fee and certain performance-based incentive fees. The management agreement has an initial four-year term, with automatic one-year renewal periods;
2.
we, one of our subsidiaries and WCO entered into a contribution agreement pursuant to which our subsidiary will contribute to WCO 100% of the equity in Marix, an entity currently holding certain state licenses to own MSRs, upon the receipt of certain change of control notifications or consents by or from applicable state licensing authorities. In exchange for such contribution we will receive equity in WCO, and once such entity has obtained the applicable GSE or Ginnie Mae approval necessary to own MSRs and has completed its first MSR acquisition as an indirect subsidiary of WCO, we will receive additional equity in WCO. The purpose of this contribution agreement is to enable WCO to acquire MSRs; and
3.
we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into various other ancillary agreements with WCO pursuant to which, among other things, WCO has the right to make the first offer to purchase certain servicing rights on our flow production and certain excess servicing spread created by us.
Regulatory Developments
The financial crisis in general, and the related tumult in the residential mortgage market in particular, have placed our industry under increased scrutiny by federal and state regulators over the past few years. We expect this scrutiny to continue. Rules, regulations and practices that have been in place for many years may be changed, and new rules and regulations have been, and may continue to be, introduced in order to address real and perceived problems in our industry. We expect to incur ongoing operational and system costs in order to comply with these rules and regulations.
Servicing Segment
In its 2014 Annual Report, approved on May 7, 2014, the Financial Stability Oversight Council recommended that state regulators work together with each other, the CFPB and the FHFA, as appropriate, to collaborate on prudential and corporate governance standards to strengthen nonbank mortgage servicing companies. It is unclear what, if any, additional regulations or requirements may be imposed on us as a result of this recommendation, or how any such additional regulations or requirements may impact our business.
In an Audit Report dated July 1, 2014 entitled “FHFA Actions to Manage Enterprise Risks from Nonbank Servicers Specializing in Troubled Mortgages,” the Office of Inspector General of the FHFA recommended that the FHFA (i) issue guidance to Fannie Mae and

56



Freddie Mac on the risk management process that should be employed to identify and mitigate risks related to nonperformance by nonbank special servicers under their contracts with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and (ii) develop a comprehensive, formal framework to mitigate the risks nonbank special servicers pose to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that includes routine FHFA examinations, reviews by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and capacity testing before acquisition of servicing rights to ensure such servicers can continue to fulfill their servicing requirements.
The FHFA agreed with the first recommendation and expects to issue the recommended guidance by December 1, 2014. The FHFA partially agreed with the second recommendation, and in response thereto (i) issued Advisory Bulletin, 2014-06, Mortgage Servicing Transfers, on June 11, 2014, which communicated supervisory expectations for risk management practices in conjunction with the sale and transfer of MSRs or the transfer of the operational responsibilities of servicing mortgage loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and (ii) stated it will assess the policies and procedures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac relating to the identification and management of risks posed by nonbank special servicers, and document such examination work by April 30, 2015. It is unclear what impact, if any, the actions taken by, or to be taken by, the FHFA in response to the Audit Report will have on our ability to acquire servicing rights to loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or our business generally.
Insurance Segment
On December 18, 2013, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac announced that effective June 1, 2014 mortgage servicers and their affiliates may not receive commissions or other forms of compensation in connection with lender-placed insurance on GSE loans. Since its June 1, 2014 effective date, this prohibition has had, and is expected to continue to have, a negative effect on the revenues and cash flows of our Insurance segment.
In an Evaluation Report dated June 25, 2014 entitled “FHFA’s Oversight of the Enterprises’ Lender-Placed Insurance Costs,” the Office of Inspector General of the FHFA recommended that the FHFA assess the merits of litigation by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac against their servicers and lender-placed insurance providers to remedy potential damages relating to historical lender-placed insurance practices, and to take appropriate action in this regard. The FHFA accepted the recommendation, and the FHFA Office of General Counsel plans to complete a litigation assessment by June 2015. Should this litigation assessment lead to the FHFA, Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac taking legal action against servicers and/or their lender-placed insurance providers, such result could have a negative effect on our business.
Due to these and other recent regulatory developments surrounding lender-placed insurance policies, we expect our sales commissions related to lender-placed insurance policies to decrease significantly during 2014. We have considered this commission reduction in our quantitative goodwill impairment test performed as of October 31, 2013; however, if the reduction is larger than anticipated, goodwill allocated to the Insurance segment could be impaired at a future date. The Insurance segment had $4.4 million of goodwill at June 30, 2014.
Additional Information
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 for additional information about the regulatory framework under which we operate.

57



Results of Operations — Comparison of Consolidated Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
Our consolidated results of operations are provided below (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net servicing revenue and fees
$
140,976

 
$
257,306

 
$
(116,330
)
 
$
313,768

 
$
394,315

 
$
(80,547
)
Net gains on sales of loans
144,611

 
235,949

 
(91,338
)
 
248,645

 
314,394

 
(65,749
)
Interest income on loans
34,218

 
36,796

 
(2,578
)
 
68,640

 
73,694

 
(5,054
)
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
26,936

 
26,731

 
205

 
44,172

 
63,519

 
(19,347
)
Insurance revenue
19,806

 
18,050

 
1,756

 
43,194

 
35,584

 
7,610

Other revenues
47,166

 
21,132

 
26,034

 
65,242

 
28,987

 
36,255

Total revenues
413,713

 
595,964

 
(182,251
)
 
783,661

 
910,493

 
(126,832
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries and benefits
145,502

 
145,282

 
220

 
281,399

 
252,015

 
29,384

General and administrative
142,341

 
125,712

 
16,629

 
251,206

 
213,152

 
38,054

Interest expense
74,690

 
68,290

 
6,400

 
149,539

 
122,432

 
27,107

Depreciation and amortization
18,391

 
17,614

 
777

 
37,035

 
33,947

 
3,088

Goodwill impairment
82,269

 

 
82,269

 
82,269

 

 
82,269

Other expenses, net
3,978

 
2,151

 
1,827

 
4,203

 
4,247

 
(44
)
Total expenses
467,171

 
359,049

 
108,122

 
805,651

 
625,793

 
179,858

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER GAINS (LOSSES)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other net fair value gains (losses)
1,532

 
1,656

 
(124
)
 
(971
)
 
395

 
(1,366
)
Total other gains (losses)
1,532

 
1,656

 
(124
)
 
(971
)
 
395

 
(1,366
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
(51,926
)
 
238,571

 
(290,497
)
 
(22,961
)
 
285,095

 
(308,056
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
(38,997
)
 
95,339

 
(134,336
)
 
(27,409
)
 
114,114

 
(141,523
)
Net income (loss)
$
(12,929
)
 
$
143,232

 
$
(156,161
)
 
$
4,448

 
$
170,981

 
$
(166,533
)

58



Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
A summary of net servicing revenue and fees is provided below (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing fees
$
173,147

 
$
143,473

 
$
29,674

 
$
339,180

 
$
263,345

 
$
75,835

Incentive and performance fees
41,482

 
41,379

 
103

 
84,339

 
75,104

 
9,235

Ancillary and other fees
20,087

 
18,586

 
1,501

 
42,740

 
34,397

 
8,343

Servicing revenue and fees
234,716

 
203,438

 
31,278

 
466,259

 
372,846

 
93,413

Changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions (1)
(43,376
)
 
93,311

 
(136,687
)
 
(68,994
)
 
89,331

 
(158,325
)
Other changes in fair value (2)
(40,176
)
 
(28,234
)
 
(11,942
)
 
(62,192
)
 
(45,329
)
 
(16,863
)
Change in fair value of servicing rights
(83,552
)
 
65,077

 
(148,629
)
 
(131,186
)
 
44,002

 
(175,188
)
Amortization of servicing rights
(10,188
)
 
(11,209
)
 
1,021

 
(21,305
)
 
(22,533
)
 
1,228

Net servicing revenue and fees
$
140,976


$
257,306


$
(116,330
)
 
$
313,768

 
$
394,315

 
$
(80,547
)
_______  
(1)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(2)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value due to the realization of expected cash flows over time.
We recognize servicing revenue and fees on servicing performed for third parties in which we either own the servicing rights or act as sub-servicer. This revenue includes contractual fees earned on the serviced loans, incentive and performance fees earned based on the performance of certain loans or loan portfolios serviced by us, and loan modification fees. Servicing revenue and fees also includes asset recovery income, which is included in incentive and performance fees, and ancillary fees such as late fees and prepayment fees. Servicing revenue earned on loans held by consolidated VIEs for which the related residential loans and real estate owned have been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets, which consists of both the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts, is eliminated in consolidation. Servicing revenue and fees are adjusted for the amortization of servicing rights carried at amortized cost and the changes in fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value.
Servicing revenue and fees increased $31.3 million and $93.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, primarily due to growth in the third-party servicing portfolio unpaid principal balance period over period, resulting primarily from bulk MSR portfolio acquisitions and servicing rights capitalized as a result of our loan origination activities, partially offset by normal run-off of the servicing portfolio. The unfavorable change in fair value of servicing rights of $148.6 million and $175.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, is related to our risk-managed class of servicing rights established on January 1, 2013. Refer to additional information on this change in fair value in the Servicing segment section of our Business Segment Results below.
A summary of third-party net servicing revenue and fees by segment is provided below (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing
$
121,648

 
$
239,687

 
$
(118,039
)
 
$
277,909

 
$
359,965

 
$
(82,056
)
Reverse Mortgage
8,777

 
6,624

 
2,153

 
16,387

 
13,372

 
3,015

Asset Receivables Management
10,551

 
10,995

 
(444
)
 
19,472

 
20,978

 
(1,506
)
Third-party net servicing revenue and fees
$
140,976

 
$
257,306

 
$
(116,330
)
 
$
313,768

 
$
394,315

 
$
(80,547
)
The decrease in third-party net servicing revenue and fees in the Asset Receivables Management segment was due primarily to a decrease in recovery income due to lower gross collections. Refer to additional information on net servicing revenue and fees for the Servicing and Reverse Mortgage segments in Business Segment Results section below.

59



Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Net gains on sales of loans consists of gains on sales of loans held for sale, fair value adjustments on loans held for sale, IRLCs and related freestanding derivatives, and a provision for the repurchase of loans. Net gains on sales of loans decreased $91.3 million and $65.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to the effect of the change in locked volume; a shift in volume from a higher margin retention channel to a lower margin correspondent channel; and reduced fair value of servicing rights included in IRLCs and loans held for sale.
Interest Income on Loans
We earn interest income on the residential loans held in the Residual Trusts and on our unencumbered forward loans, both of which are accounted for at amortized cost. Interest income decreased $2.6 million and $5.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, primarily due to a decrease in the related average residential loan balances outstanding.
Provided below is a summary of the average balances of residential loans carried at amortized cost and the related interest income and average yields (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Residential loans at amortized cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
 
$
34,218

 
$
36,796

 
$
(2,578
)
 
$
68,640

 
$
73,694

 
$
(5,054
)
Average balance (1)
 
1,381,806

 
1,475,445

 
(93,639
)
 
1,390,934

 
1,487,215

 
(96,281
)
Annualized average yield
 
9.91
%
 
9.98
%
 
(0.07
)%
 
9.87
%
 
9.91
%
 
(0.04
)%
__________
(1)
Average balance is calculated as the average recorded investment in the loans at the beginning and end of each quarter during the period.
Net Fair Value Gains on Reverse Loans and Related HMBS Obligations
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations includes the contractual interest income earned on reverse loans, including those not yet securitized or bought out of securitization pools, net of interest expense on HMBS related obligations and the change in fair value of these assets and liabilities. The net contractual interest approximates our servicing fees. Included in the change in fair value are gains due to loan originations, which include draws on reverse loans where the borrower has additional borrowing capacity. These gains result from the pricing of an aggregated pool of loans exceeding the cost of the origination or acquisition of the loan as well as changes in fair value resulting from changes to market pricing on newly originated HECMs and HMBS. No gain or loss is recognized upon securitization of reverse loans as these transactions are accounted for as secured borrowings. Refer to the Business Segment Results section below for additional information including a detailed breakout of the components of net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations.
Net contractual interest declined by $0.2 million and $1.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to an increase in due and payable reverse loans which have a lower interest rate than those loans that are active. Cash generated by origination, purchase and securitization of HECMs included in the change in fair value decreased by $22.4 million and $39.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, primarily as a result of lower new origination volume, partially offset by a higher volume of securitizations of borrower draws on existing reverse loans. Total securitization volume for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 declined by 55% . Non-cash fair value gains included in the change in fair value increased by $22.8 million and $21.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due to the change in market pricing for newly securitized HECMs and HMBS.
Insurance Revenue
Insurance revenue consists of commission income and fees earned on voluntary and lender-placed insurance policies issued and other products sold to borrowers, net of estimated future policy cancellations. Commission income is based on a percentage of the premium of the insurance policy issued, which varies based on the type of policy. Insurance revenue increased $1.8 million and $7.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to an increase in lender-placed insurance policies issued in relation to the 2013 and early 2014 bulk servicing right acquisitions, partially offset by run-off of policies previously in-force and a decrease in commissions related to lender-placed insurance policies resulting from regulatory changes as addressed below.

60



Due to recent regulatory developments surrounding lender-placed insurance policies that became effective in June 2014, our sales commissions related to lender-placed insurance policies began to decrease in June 2014. We are actively looking at alternatives to preserve or replace the value of the revenue streams in our insurance business. However, there is no assurance that our efforts will be successful in preserving or replacing any affected revenue streams or otherwise preserving for our shareholders all or any part of our lender-placed insurance business.
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist primarily of asset management performance fees, origination fee income, income associated with our beneficial interest in a servicing asset, and changes in fair value of our charged-off loans. Other revenues increased $26.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned by our Other non-reportable segment in connection with the investment management of a fund. Theses fees were earned in connection with the liquidation of the fund’s investments during the current period and are based on the fund exceeding pre-defined thresholds. These fees are recorded when the fund is terminated or when the likelihood of claw-back is improbable. The increase in asset management performance fees was partially offset by $10.1 million in lower origination fee income resulting from lower fees charged to borrowers for refinancing loans. Origination fee income was $6.8 million and $16.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Other revenues increased $36.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to $34.2 million in asset management performance fees as discussed above, and $7.5 million in income for our beneficial interest that did not exist in the prior year period, partially offset by $7.9 million in lower origination fee income resulting from lower fees charged to borrowers for refinancing loans. Origination fee income was $12.7 million and $20.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense remained relatively flat during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 . Salaries and benefits increased $29.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to employees acquired in connection with our recent acquisitions and hiring to support the growth of our business. Headcount increased by approximately 400 full-time employees from approximately 6,200 at June 30, 2013 to approximately 6,600 at June 30, 2014 .
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased $16.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due mainly to higher direct expenses of $26.8 million in our Servicing segment, partially offset by lower direct expenses of $7.4 million in our Originations segment. Our Servicing segment had additional costs associated with growth in the servicing portfolio, including a higher provision on advances of $15.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , resulting from a higher level of advances. In addition, our Servicing segment had $13.7 million in higher legal fees due to litigation and regulatory matters. Our Origination segment had lower expenses due primarily to the decline in funded volume and the management of expenses to align with the scope and scale of current operations.
General and administrative expenses increased $38.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to higher direct expenses in our Servicing and Originations segments of $38.1 million and $8.2 million , respectively, offset by lower direct costs in our Other non-reportable segment of $8.7 million . Our Servicing segment had additional costs associated with growth in the servicing portfolio, including a higher provision on advances of $21.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , resulting from a higher level of advances. In addition, there were $16.4 million in higher legal fees due to litigation and regulatory matters. Our Originations segment had larger expenses primarily as a result of the ramp-up in business following the acquisition of the capital markets and originations platforms from ResCap on January 31, 2013 and the correspondent lending business from Ally Bank on March 1, 2013. Our Other non-reportable segment experienced a decline in expenses due to debt issuance costs incurred in the prior year for debt financing transactions. These expenses were not incurred in the current year.
Interest Expense
We incur interest expense on our corporate debt, mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts, master repurchase agreements and servicing advance liabilities, all of which are accounted for at amortized cost. Interest expense increased $6.4 million and $27.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to corporate debt transactions throughout 2013, which included incremental borrowings under our 2012 Term Loan and related subsequent refinancing activities under our 2013 Term Loan and the issuance of our Senior Notes. The increase in the average balance of our corporate debt was partially offset by a decrease in the average rate during the three and six months ended

61



June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 as a result of corporate debt activities addressed above. These financing transactions resulted in a lower cost of debt. In addition, interest expense increased as a result of higher average balances of servicing advance liabilities, which are utilized to finance servicer and protective advances, due to our growing servicing business. For the three months ended June 30, 2014 , these increases were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense related to master repurchase agreements as a result of lower average outstanding balances and a lower average interest rate. The average balance of master repurchase agreements, which are utilized to fund purchases and originations of forward and reverse loans, decreased as a result of a decrease in funded loan originations during the second quarter of 2014. Refer to additional information on our corporate debt activity within the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.
Provided below is a summary of the average balances of our debt, mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts, and servicing advance liabilities, as well as the related interest expense and average rates (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Corporate debt (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
36,836

 
$
30,567

 
$
6,269

 
$
73,319

 
$
55,785

 
$
17,534

Average balance
 
2,272,029

 
1,744,319

 
527,710

 
2,272,642

 
1,592,046

 
680,596

Annualized average rate
 
6.49
%
 
7.01
%
 
(0.52
)%
 
6.45
%
 
7.01
%
 
(0.56
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
19,860

 
$
21,800

 
$
(1,940
)
 
$
40,163

 
$
44,096

 
$
(3,933
)
Average balance
 
1,164,344

 
1,273,822

 
(109,478
)
 
1,177,257

 
1,287,696

 
(110,439
)
Annualized average rate
 
6.82
%
 
6.85
%
 
(0.03
)%
 
6.82
%
 
6.85
%
 
(0.03
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Servicing advance liabilities (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
10,599

 
$
5,166

 
$
5,433

 
$
20,980

 
$
7,576

 
$
13,404

Average balance
 
997,350

 
435,183

 
562,167

 
985,991

 
324,920

 
661,071

Annualized average rate
 
4.25
%
 
4.75
%
 
(0.50
)%
 
4.26
%
 
4.66
%
 
(0.40
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Master repurchase agreements (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
7,395

 
$
10,757

 
$
(3,362
)
 
$
15,077

 
$
14,975

 
$
102

Average balance
 
874,708

 
1,048,023

 
(173,315
)
 
852,499

 
700,616

 
151,883

Annualized average rate
 
3.38
%
 
4.11
%
 
(0.73
)%
 
3.54
%
 
4.27
%
 
(0.73
)%
__________
(1)
Corporate debt includes our secured term loans, Senior Notes, and Convertible Notes. Corporate debt activities are included in the Other non-reportable segment.
(2)
Mortgage-backed debt of the Residual Trusts is held by our Loans and Residuals segment.
(3)
Servicing advance liabilities are held by the Servicing segment.
(4)
Master repurchase agreements are held by the Originations and Reverse Mortgage segments.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of amortization of intangible assets other than goodwill and depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment including amortization of capitalized software. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.8 million and $3.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, primarily as a result of the acquisition of premises and equipment, partially offset by a decline in amortization of intangible assets acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of Green Tree on July 1, 2011. Certain of these intangible assets are now fully amortized.
Goodwill Impairment
We incurred a $82.3 million impairment charge as a result of a goodwill evaluation performed in the second quarter of 2014 . The evaluation indicated the estimated implied fair value of the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit’s goodwill was less than its book

62



value, therefore requiring the impairment charge. Refer to Note 12 in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Other Expenses, Net
Included in other expenses, net is the provision for loan losses on our residential loan portfolio accounted for at amortized cost, real estate owned expenses, net and claims expense. The provision for loan losses increased by $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to a $1.6 million decrease in the allowance for loan losses requirement for the three months ended June 30, 2013 resulting from severity improvements realized during that quarter. The allowance for loan losses requirement for the three months ended June 30, 2014 was generally flat compared to the beginning of the quarter due to stabilized loss severities.
The provision for loan losses decreased $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to reduced charge-offs which have resulted from lower loss severities, which improved throughout 2013 and continued into 2014 from higher average home selling prices in our markets, and a decrease in the default frequency rate used to calculate the allowance for loan losses based on favorable foreclosure trends.
Other Net Fair Value Gains (Losses)
Other net fair value gains (losses) consists primarily of fair value gains and losses on the Non-Residual Trust assets and liabilities and fluctuates generally based on changes in LIBOR rates. In addition, we had an increase in the estimated liability for a contingent earn-out payment related to the acquisition of S1L of $1.1 million and $4.8 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 , respectively.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Income tax expense (benefit) decreased $134.3 million and $141.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to the impairment of goodwill and the decrease in income before income taxes to a loss before income taxes. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded an impairment of goodwill related to the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit. This goodwill is not deductible for tax and as such, no tax benefit was recorded for this impairment. For the second quarter of 2014, we calculated the tax benefit related to loss before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2014 based on its estimated annual effective tax rate which takes into account all expected ordinary activity for the 2014 year. Due to the significant nature of the non-deductible expense related to the impairment of goodwill compared to expected ordinary income for the year ended December 31, 2014, our estimated annual effective tax rate for the year is approximately 119% . This effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of the non-deductible goodwill impairment as well as the impact of state taxes. As we report income tax expense (benefit) on an interim basis using an estimated annual effective tax rate, the expected tax rate for the remainder of 2014 is anticipated to approximate the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2014 of 119% .
Financial Condition — Comparison of Consolidated Financial Condition at June 30, 2014 to December 31, 2013
Our total assets and total liabilities increased $998.4 million and $980.2 million , respectively, at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 .
Residential loans at fair value increased by $927.0 million primarily as a result of reverse loan purchases and originations and, to a lesser extent, forward loan purchases and originations.
Servicing rights increased by $343.6 million due primarily to $398.0 million in MSR portfolio acquisitions, which included servicing rights from EverBank and an affiliate of a national bank which were recorded upon receipt of investor approval during the current period, and $98.2 million in servicing rights capitalized upon sales of loans with servicing retained, partially offset by a $131.2 million unfavorable change in fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value.
Servicer and protective advances increased by $214.5 million primarily as a result of advances acquired in conjunction with the acquisitions of servicing rights from EverBank and an affiliate of a national bank as discussed above as well as other growth in the servicing portfolio.

63



Goodwill at June 30, 2014 was $575.5 million as compared to $657.7 million at December 31, 2013 . The decrease was driven by a $82.3 million second quarter 2014 non-cash impairment charge to the asset carrying value. The impairment testing is performed on each of our reporting units on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. At June 30, 2014 , our analysis indicated impairment in the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit’s goodwill, therefore resulting in the goodwill impairment charge. The primary cause of the goodwill impairment in the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit was the decline in the estimated fair value of the unit as a result of recent regulatory developments and reverse mortgage product changes including the deferral of cash flows to future periods as a result of those product changes, changes in servicing protocols to meet regulatory requirements and other changes negatively impacting the operating results of the Reverse Mortgage segment. We have revised our strategy and approach to the market as a result of these changes. Refer to Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Payables and accrued liabilities increased by $128.1 million primarily as a result of payables for servicing rights and related advances as we received GSE investor approvals to transfer servicing from EverBank and an affiliate of a national bank as discussed above.
HMBS related obligations increased by $819.9 million , which is an offset to the increase in reverse loans at fair value resulting from the securitization of these loans.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We manage our Company in six reportable segments: Servicing, Originations, Reverse Mortgage, ARM, Insurance and Loans and Residuals. We measure the performance of our business segments through the following measures: income (loss) before income taxes, Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings, and Adjusted EBITDA. Management considers Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA, both non-GAAP financial measures, to be important in the evaluation of our business segments and of the Company as a whole, as well as for allocating capital resources to our segments. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are utilized to assess the underlying operational performance of the continuing operations of the business. In addition, analysts, investors, and creditors may use these measures when analyzing our operating performance. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP and our use of these terms may vary from other companies in our industry.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings is a metric that is used by management as a supplemental metric to evaluate our Company’s underlying key drivers and operating performance of the business. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes plus certain depreciation and amortization costs related to the increased basis in assets, including servicing and sub-servicing rights, acquired within business combination transactions, or step-up depreciation and amortization, transaction and integration costs, share-based compensation expense, non-cash interest expense, the net impact of the Non-Residual Trusts, fair value to cash adjustments for reverse loans, and certain other cash and non-cash adjustments, primarily including severance expense and certain other non-recurring start-up costs. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings excludes unrealized changes in fair value of MSRs that are based on projections of expected future cash flows and prepayments. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings includes both cash and non-cash gains from forward mortgage origination activities. Non-cash gains are net of non-cash charges or reserves provided. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings includes cash generated from reverse mortgage origination activities. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings may also include other adjustments, as applicable based upon facts and circumstances, consistent with the intent of providing investors a supplemental means of evaluating our operating performance.
Adjusted EBITDA eliminates the effects of financing, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, interest expense on corporate debt, transaction and integration related costs, the net impact of the Non-Residual Trusts and certain other cash and non-cash adjustments primarily including severance expense, the net provision for the repurchase of loans sold and certain other non-recurring start-up costs. Adjusted EBITDA includes both cash and non-cash gains from forward mortgage origination activities. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the impact of fair value option accounting on certain assets and liabilities and includes cash generated from reverse mortgage origination activities. Adjusted EBITDA may also include other adjustments, as applicable based upon facts and circumstances, consistent with the intent of providing investors a supplemental means of evaluating our operating performance.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to (1) net income (loss) or any other performance measures determined in accordance with GAAP or (2) operating cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA have important limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations are:

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect cash expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

64



Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect certain tax payments that may represent reductions in cash available to us;
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future;
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our corporate debt, although they do reflect interest expense associated with our master repurchase agreements, mortgage-backed debt, and HMBS related obligations;
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect non-cash compensation which is and will remain a key element of our overall long-term incentive compensation package; and
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions.
Because of these limitations, Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA only as supplements. Users of our financial statements are cautioned not to place undue reliance on Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA.
The following tables reconcile Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA to income (loss) before income taxes, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30, 2014
Loss before income taxes
 
$
(22,961
)
Adjustments:
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
68,994

Step-up depreciation and amortization  (1)
 
39,377

Litigation and regulatory matters (2)
 
13,192

Goodwill impairment
 
82,269

Share-based compensation expense
 
8,301

Non-cash interest expense
 
7,349

Transaction and integration costs  (3)
 
5,057

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts (4)
 
3,434

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans (5)
 
(1,222
)
Other (6)
 
6,190

Sub-total
 
232,941

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings
 
$
209,980

_________
(1)
Represents depreciation and amortization costs related to the increased basis in assets, including servicing and sub-servicing rights, acquired within business combination transactions.
(2)
Represents accruals for probable losses and cost of external advisors related to certain significant litigation and regulatory matters that are not considered ordinary course of business.
(3)
Represents legal and professional expenses associated with our acquisitions and potential future growth initiatives.
(4) Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments related to the Non-Residual Trusts net of the cash servicing fee earned on the underlying residential loans.
(5)
Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments to arrive at cash generated from reverse mortgage origination activities.
(6) Represents other cash and non-cash adjustments primarily including severance expense and non-recurring charges such as costs to exit the mortgage wholesale channel acquired from Ally Bank in 2013.

65



Adjusted EBITDA
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30, 2014
Loss before income taxes
 
$
(22,961
)
Adjustments:
 
 
Amortization and fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
152,491

Interest expense on debt
 
75,956

Depreciation and amortization
 
37,035

Litigation and regulatory matters (1)
 
13,192

Goodwill impairment
 
82,269

Servicing fee economics (2)
 
9,750

Share-based compensation expense
 
8,301

Non-cash interest income
 
(7,940
)
Residual Trusts cash flows (3)
 
5,390

Transaction and integration costs (4)
 
5,057

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts (5)
 
3,434

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans (6)
 
(1,222
)
Provision for loan losses
 
517

Other (7)
 
5,928

Sub-total
 
390,158

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
367,197

_________
(1)
Represents accruals for probable losses and cost of external advisors related to certain significant litigation and regulatory matters that are not considered ordinary course of business.
(2)
Represents economics received on MSRs associated with EverBank and those acquired from an affiliate of a large national bank.
(3) Represents cash flows in excess of overcollateralization requirements that have been released to us from the Residual Trusts.
(4) Represents legal and professional expenses associated with our acquisitions and potential future growth initiatives.
(5) Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments related to the Non-Residual Trusts net of the cash servicing fee earned on the underlying residential loans.
(6)
Represents the non-cash fair value adjustments to arrive at cash generated from reverse mortgage origination activities.
(7)
Represents other cash and non-cash adjustments primarily including the net provision for the repurchase of loans sold, severance expense and non-recurring charges such as costs to exit the mortgage wholesale channel acquired from Ally Bank in 2013.
Business Segment Results
In calculating income (loss) before income taxes for our segments, we allocate indirect expenses to our business segments and include these expenses in other expenses, net. Indirect expenses are allocated to our Insurance segment based on the ratio of the number of policies to the number of accounts serviced and to our Originations, Reverse Mortgage, ARM and certain non-reportable segments based on headcount. All remaining indirect expenses are allocated to our Servicing segment. We do not allocate indirect expenses to our Loans and Residuals segment.
We reconcile our income (loss) before income taxes for our business segments to our GAAP consolidated income (loss) before taxes and report the financial results of our Non-Residual Trusts, other non-reportable operating segments and certain corporate expenses and amounts to eliminate intercompany transactions between segments as other activity. For a reconciliation of our income (loss) before income taxes for our business segments to our GAAP consolidated income (loss) before income taxes, refer to Note 21 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer below for further information on results of operations for our Servicing, Originations and Reverse Mortgage segments. Results for our ARM, Insurance and Loans and Residuals segments are included in the Results of Operations section as there has been no material change in these segments period over period.

66



Reconciliation of GAAP Consolidated Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes to Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) and Adjusted EBITDA
Provided below is a reconciliation of our consolidated income (loss) before income taxes under GAAP to our Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other (1)
 
Total
Consolidated
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
(51,551
)
 
$
64,346

 
$
(86,631
)
 
$
4,826

 
$
10,943

 
$
7,469

 
$
(1,328
)
 
$
(51,926
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill impairment
 

 

 
82,269

 

 

 

 

 
82,269

Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
43,376

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
43,376

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
4,965

 
2,443

 
1,781

 
1,006

 
1,130

 

 
7

 
11,332

Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
7,682

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
7,682

Litigation and regulatory matters
 
13,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
13,192

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 

 

 
(5,883
)
 

 

 

 

 
(5,883
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
2,370

 
1,157

 
829

 
88

 
382

 

 
(18
)
 
4,808

Non-cash interest expense
 
168

 

 

 

 

 
1,472

 
2,399

 
4,039

Transaction and integration costs
 
752

 

 
3,500

 
56

 

 

 
(781
)
 
3,527

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(701
)
 
(701
)
Other
 

 
2,797

 
407

 

 

 

 
7

 
3,211

Total adjustments
 
72,505

 
6,397

 
82,903

 
1,150

 
1,512

 
1,472

 
913

 
166,852

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss)
 
20,954

 
70,743

 
(3,728
)
 
5,976

 
12,455

 
8,941

 
(415
)
 
114,926

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
41,989

 

 
693

 

 

 

 

 
42,682

Interest expense on debt
 
19

 

 
8

 

 

 

 
34,410

 
34,437

Depreciation and amortization
 
4,014

 
2,314

 
521

 
207

 

 

 
3

 
7,059

Non-cash interest income
 
(270
)
 

 
(32
)
 

 

 
(3,651
)
 

 
(3,953
)
Residual Trusts cash flows
 

 

 

 

 

 
3,820

 

 
3,820

Provision for loan losses
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,521

 

 
1,521

Other
 
726

 
(1,292
)
 
(14
)
 
5

 
5

 
(444
)
 
(82
)
 
(1,096
)
Total adjustments
 
46,478

 
1,022

 
1,176

 
212

 
5

 
1,246

 
34,331

 
84,470

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
67,432

 
$
71,765

 
$
(2,552
)
 
$
6,188

 
$
12,460

 
$
10,187

 
$
33,916

 
$
199,396

__________
(1)
Our Other non-reportable segment includes $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned in connection with the investment management of a fund. Refer to Note 2 in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on this transaction.


67



 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other (1)
 
Total
Consolidated
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
(17,780
)
 
$
84,556

 
$
(96,431
)
 
$
7,325

 
$
25,610

 
$
17,724

 
$
(43,965
)
 
$
(22,961
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill impairment
 

 

 
82,269

 

 

 

 

 
82,269

Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
68,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
68,994

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
9,833

 
5,296

 
3,674

 
2,100

 
2,313

 

 
14

 
23,230

Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
16,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
16,147

Litigation and regulatory matters
 
13,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
13,192

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 

 

 
(1,222
)
 

 

 

 

 
(1,222
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
3,911

 
1,986

 
1,319

 
151

 
686

 

 
248

 
8,301

Non-cash interest expense
 
346

 

 

 

 

 
2,291

 
4,712

 
7,349

Transaction and integration costs
 
863

 

 
3,500

 
92

 

 

 
602

 
5,057

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,434

 
3,434

Other
 
5

 
5,775

 
355

 

 

 

 
55

 
6,190

Total adjustments
 
113,291

 
13,057

 
89,895

 
2,343

 
2,999

 
2,291

 
9,065

 
232,941

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss)
 
95,511

 
97,613

 
(6,536
)
 
9,668

 
28,609

 
20,015

 
(34,900
)
 
209,980

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
65,907

 

 
1,443

 

 

 

 

 
67,350

Interest expense on debt
 
51

 

 
18

 

 

 

 
68,538

 
68,607

Depreciation and amortization
 
7,851

 
4,456

 
1,077

 
415

 

 

 
6

 
13,805

Servicing fee economics
 
9,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
9,750

Non-cash interest income
 
(566
)
 

 
(97
)
 

 

 
(7,277
)
 

 
(7,940
)
Residual Trusts cash flows
 

 

 

 

 

 
5,390

 

 
5,390

Provision for loan losses
 

 

 

 

 

 
517

 

 
517

Other
 
1,553

 
(199
)
 
54

 
12

 
26

 
(1,610
)
 
(98
)
 
(262
)
Total adjustments
 
84,546

 
4,257

 
2,495

 
427

 
26

 
(2,980
)
 
68,446

 
157,217

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
180,057

 
$
101,870

 
$
(4,041
)
 
$
10,095

 
$
28,635

 
$
17,035

 
$
33,546

 
$
367,197

__________
(1)
Our Other non-reportable segment includes $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned in connection with the investment management of a fund. Refer to Note 2 in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on this transaction.


68



 
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Total
Consolidated
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
113,185

 
$
145,879

 
$
(9,817
)
 
$
3,835

 
$
8,954

 
$
10,750

 
$
(34,215
)
 
$
238,571

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
(93,311
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(93,311
)
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
6,029

 
1,933

 
2,353

 
1,483

 
1,018

 

 
5

 
12,821

Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
8,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8,125

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 

 

 
16,886

 

 

 

 

 
16,886

Share-based compensation expense
 
1,895

 
885

 
436

 
151

 
311

 

 
174

 
3,852

Non-cash interest expense
 
210

 

 

 

 
(19
)
 
(40
)
 
2,163

 
2,314

Transaction and integration costs
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,658

 
3,658

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
33

 
33

Debt issuance costs not capitalized
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
343

 
343

Other
 

 

 
6,000

 

 

 

 
(63
)
 
5,937

Total adjustments
 
(77,052
)
 
2,818

 
25,675

 
1,634

 
1,310

 
(40
)
 
6,313

 
(39,342
)
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss)
 
36,133

 
148,697

 
15,858

 
5,469

 
10,264

 
10,710

 
(27,902
)
 
199,229

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
30,443

 

 
875

 

 

 

 

 
31,318

Interest expense on debt
 

 

 
9

 

 

 

 
28,395

 
28,404

Depreciation and amortization
 
3,416

 
756

 
338

 
131

 
150

 

 
2

 
4,793

Non-cash interest income
 
(359
)
 

 
(135
)
 

 
7

 
(4,085
)
 

 
(4,572
)
Residual Trusts cash flows
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,077

 

 
1,077

Provision for loan losses
 

 

 

 

 

 
95

 

 
95

Other
 
687

 
2,266

 
(51
)
 
10

 
26

 
(747
)
 
(389
)
 
1,802

Total adjustments
 
34,187

 
3,022

 
1,036

 
141

 
183

 
(3,660
)
 
28,008

 
62,917

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
70,320

 
$
151,719

 
$
16,894

 
$
5,610

 
$
10,447

 
$
7,050

 
$
106

 
$
262,146



69



 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Servicing
 
Originations
 
Reverse
Mortgage
 
Asset
Receivables
Management
 
Insurance
 
Loans and
Residuals
 
Other
 
Total
Consolidated
Income (loss) before income taxes
 
$
135,214

 
$
180,138

 
$
2,272

 
$
6,203

 
$
16,673

 
$
19,363

 
$
(74,768
)
 
$
285,095

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
(89,331
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(89,331
)
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
12,218

 
3,210

 
4,804

 
2,956

 
2,482

 

 
11

 
25,681

Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
16,235

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
16,235

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 

 

 
20,422

 

 

 

 

 
20,422

Share-based compensation expense
 
3,392

 
1,153

 
723

 
289

 
650

 

 
335

 
6,542

Non-cash interest expense
 
430

 

 

 

 

 
637

 
4,250

 
5,317

Transaction and integration costs
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
15,285

 
15,285

Net impact of Non-Residual Trusts
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(446
)
 
(446
)
Debt issuance costs not capitalized
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
5,043

 
5,043

Other
 

 

 
6,000

 

 

 

 
(52
)
 
5,948

Total adjustments
 
(57,056
)
 
4,363

 
31,949

 
3,245

 
3,132

 
637

 
24,426

 
10,696

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss)
 
78,158

 
184,501

 
34,221

 
9,448

 
19,805

 
20,000

 
(50,342
)
 
295,791

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
49,834

 

 
1,793

 

 

 

 

 
51,627

Interest expense on debt
 

 

 
26

 

 

 

 
51,509

 
51,535

Depreciation and amortization
 
6,084

 
1,156

 
610

 
414

 

 

 
2

 
8,266

Non-cash interest income
 
(820
)
 

 
(286
)
 

 

 
(8,034
)
 

 
(9,140
)
Residual Trusts cash flows
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,477

 

 
1,477

Provision for loan losses
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,821

 

 
1,821

Other
 
1,130

 
2,307

 
(14
)
 
18

 
44

 
(2,439
)
 
(285
)
 
761

Total adjustments
 
56,228

 
3,463

 
2,129

 
432

 
44

 
(7,175
)
 
51,226

 
106,347

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
134,386

 
$
187,964

 
$
36,350

 
$
9,880

 
$
19,849

 
$
12,825

 
$
884

 
$
402,138




70



Servicing
Provided below is a summary of results of operations, Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA for our Servicing segment (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Third parties
 
$
121,648

 
$
239,687

 
$
(118,039
)
 
$
277,909

 
$
359,965

 
$
(82,056
)
Intercompany
 
4,992

 
4,745

 
247

 
9,557

 
9,594

 
(37
)
Total net servicing revenue and fees
 
126,640

 
244,432

 
(117,792
)
 
287,466

 
369,559

 
(82,093
)
Other revenues
 
1,157

 
457

 
700

 
9,711

 
919

 
8,792

Total revenues
 
127,797

 
244,889

 
(117,092
)
 
297,177

 
370,478

 
(73,301
)
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
102,938

 
69,224

 
33,714

 
168,835

 
118,709

 
50,126

Salaries and benefits
 
56,645

 
47,690

 
8,955

 
107,065

 
90,253

 
16,812

Interest expense
 
10,619

 
5,166

 
5,453

 
21,032

 
7,576

 
13,456

Depreciation and amortization
 
8,979

 
9,445

 
(466
)
 
17,684

 
18,302

 
(618
)
Total expenses
 
179,181

 
131,525

 
47,656

 
314,616

 
234,840

 
79,776

Other net fair value losses
 
(167
)
 
(179
)
 
12

 
(341
)
 
(424
)
 
83

Income (loss) before income taxes
 
(51,551
)
 
113,185

 
(164,736
)
 
(17,780
)
 
135,214

 
(152,994
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of servicing rights due to changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions
 
43,376

 
(93,311
)
 
136,687

 
68,994

 
(89,331
)
 
158,325

Litigation and regulatory matters
 
13,192

 

 
13,192

 
13,192

 

 
13,192

Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
4,965

 
6,029

 
(1,064
)
 
9,833

 
12,218

 
(2,385
)
Step-up amortization of sub-servicing rights
 
7,682

 
8,125

 
(443
)
 
16,147

 
16,235

 
(88
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
2,370

 
1,895

 
475

 
3,911

 
3,392

 
519

Non-cash interest expense
 
168

 
210

 
(42
)
 
346

 
430

 
(84
)
Transaction and integration costs
 
752

 

 
752

 
863

 

 
863

Other
 

 

 

 
5

 

 
5

Total adjustments
 
72,505

 
(77,052
)
 
149,557

 
113,291

 
(57,056
)
 
170,347

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings
 
20,954

 
36,133

 
(15,179
)
 
95,511

 
78,158

 
17,353

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization and other fair value adjustments of servicing rights
 
41,989

 
30,443

 
11,546

 
65,907

 
49,834

 
16,073

Servicing fee economics
 

 

 

 
9,750

 

 
9,750

Interest expense on debt
 
19

 

 
19

 
51

 

 
51

Depreciation and amortization
 
4,014

 
3,416

 
598

 
7,851

 
6,084

 
1,767

Non-cash interest income
 
(270
)
 
(359
)
 
89

 
(566
)
 
(820
)
 
254

Other
 
726

 
687

 
39

 
1,553

 
1,130

 
423

Total adjustments
 
46,478

 
34,187

 
12,291

 
84,546

 
56,228

 
28,318

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
67,432


$
70,320


$
(2,888
)
 
$
180,057

 
$
134,386

 
$
45,671


71



Forward Mortgage Servicing Portfolio
Our Servicing segment services loans where we own the servicing right and on behalf of other servicing right or mortgage loan owners, which we refer to as “sub-servicing.” A sub-servicing asset (or liability) is recognized on our consolidated balance sheet when the sub-servicing fee is deemed to be greater (or lower) than adequate compensation for the servicing activities performed by the Company. No sub-servicing asset or liability is recorded if the amounts earned represent adequate compensation. Generally, no servicing asset or liability is recognized when we enter into new sub-servicing contracts; however, previously existing contracts acquired in a business combination may be deemed to provide greater (or lower) than adequate compensation.
Provided below are summaries of the activity in our third-party servicing portfolio for our forward mortgage business, which includes accounts serviced for third parties for which we earn servicing revenue and, thus, excludes servicing performed related to residential loans and real estate owned that have been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Capitalized (1)
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Not Capitalized
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
1,894,446

 
$
143,365,961

 
$
10,428,980

 
$
45,033,529

 
$
198,828,470

Acquisition of pool of Fannie Mae MSRs
 
254,960

 
27,559,108

 

 

 
27,559,108

Acquisition of EverBank net assets
 
72,176

 
9,756,509

 

 

 
9,756,509

Loan sales with servicing retained (2)
 
30,465

 
3,716,570

 

 

 
3,716,570

Other new business added (2)
 
89,416

 
2,335,791

 

 
6,972,516

 
9,308,307

Payoffs, sales and curtailments, net (3)
 
(167,067
)
 
(13,115,847
)
 
(1,373,751
)
 
(2,734,581
)
 
(17,224,179
)
Ending balance
 
2,174,396

 
$
173,618,092

 
$
9,055,229

 
$
49,271,464

 
$
231,944,785

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At June 30, 2014
Ending number of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
1,544,617

 
200,358

 
429,421

 
2,174,396

_______
(1)
Consists of sub-servicing contracts acquired through business combinations whereby the benefits from the contract are greater than “adequate compensation” for performing the servicing.
(2)
Loan sales with servicing retained comprised 8,212 accounts and $1.8 billion in unpaid principal balance and other new business comprised 87,157 accounts and $8.9 billion in unpaid principal balance for the three months ended June 30, 2014 .
(3)
Payoffs, sales and curtailments, net comprised 86,665 accounts and $9.8 billion in unpaid principal balance for the three months ended June 30, 2014 . Amounts presented are net of loan sales associated with servicing retained multi-channel recapture activities of $2.6 billion and $4.8 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , respectively.

72



 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Servicing
Rights
Capitalized
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Capitalized (1)
 
Sub-Servicing
Rights
Not Capitalized
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
902,405

 
$
20,437,051

 
$
13,309,915

 
$
40,912,250

 
$
74,659,216

Acquisition of ResCap net assets
 
381,540

 
42,287,026

 

 

 
42,287,026

Acquisition of BOA assets
 
607,434

 
84,438,119

 

 

 
84,438,119

Loan sales with servicing retained (2)
 
4,939

 
1,148,928

 

 

 
1,148,928

Other new business added (2)
 
57,179

 
6,326,390

 

 
2,809,965

 
9,136,355

Payoffs, sales and curtailments, net (3)
 
(145,985
)
 
(16,979,342
)
 
(1,463,294
)
 
(515,271
)
 
(18,957,907
)
Ending balance
 
1,807,512

 
$
137,658,172

 
$
11,846,621

 
$
43,206,944

 
$
192,711,737

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At June 30, 2013
Ending number of accounts associated with our forward loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
1,299,955

 
248,509

 
259,048

 
1,807,512

_______
(1)
Consists of sub-servicing contracts acquired through business combinations whereby the benefits from the contract are greater than “adequate compensation” for performing the servicing.
(2)
Loan sales with servicing retained comprised 4,923 accounts and $1.1 billion in unpaid principal balance and other new business comprised 34,721 accounts and $5.1 billion in unpaid principal balance for the three months ended June 30, 2013 .
(3)
Payoffs, sales and curtailments, net comprised 87,242 accounts and $11.9 billion in unpaid principal balance for the three months ended June 30, 2013 . Amounts presented are net of loan sales associated with servicing retained multi-channel recapture activities of $6.1 billion and $12.3 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 , respectively.

Provided below are summaries of the number of accounts, unpaid principal balance, weighted average contractual servicing fee and past due status of our third-party servicing portfolio and on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned, all of which are associated with forward mortgages (dollars in thousands). The Servicing segment receives intercompany servicing fees related to on-balance sheet assets.
 
 
At June 30, 2014
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual Servicing Fee
 
30 Days or
More Past Due (1)
Third-party servicing portfolio composition of accounts serviced associated with forward mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien mortgages
 
1,631,629

 
$
215,731,071

 
0.24
%
 
10.48
%
Second lien mortgages
 
253,957

 
8,056,546

 
0.55
%
 
2.81
%
Manufactured housing
 
269,414

 
8,055,460

 
1.07
%
 
3.95
%
Other
 
19,396

 
101,708

 
0.93
%
 
13.89
%
Total accounts serviced for third parties
 
2,174,396

 
231,944,785

 
0.28
%
 
9.99
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages (2)
 
58,625

 
3,248,985

 
 
 
4.85
%
Total servicing portfolio associated with forward mortgages
 
2,233,021

 
$
235,193,770

 
 
 
9.92
%


73



 
 
At December 31, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual Servicing Fee
 
30 Days or
More Past Due (1)
Third-party servicing portfolio composition of accounts serviced associated with forward mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien mortgages
 
1,294,343

 
$
181,208,279


0.23
%
 
12.30
%
Second lien mortgages
 
286,992

 
8,873,955


0.58
%
 
3.78
%
Manufactured housing
 
286,934

 
8,602,932


1.07
%
 
4.00
%
Other
 
26,177

 
143,304


0.93
%
 
28.21
%
Total accounts serviced for third parties
 
1,894,446

 
198,828,470


0.28
%
 
11.57
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages (2)
 
60,491

 
3,274,846

 
 
 
5.26
%
Total servicing portfolio associated with forward mortgages
 
1,954,937

 
$
202,103,316

 
 
 
11.47
%
_______  
(1)
Past due status is measured based on either the MBA method or the OTS method as specified in the servicing agreement. Under the MBA method, a loan is considered past due if its monthly payment is not received by the end of the day immediately preceding the loan's next due date. Under the OTS method, a loan is considered past due if its monthly payment is not received by the loan's due date in the following month. Past due status, specifically related to loans within the Residual Trusts and loans collateralized by manufactured housing, is based on the current contractual due date of the loan. In the case of an approved repayment plan, including a plan approved by the bankruptcy court, or a completed loan modification, past due status is based on the modified due date or status of the loan.
(2)
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned primarily includes loans of the Loans and Residuals Segment and the Non-Residual Trusts as well as forward loans held for sale.
The unpaid principal balance associated with first lien forward mortgages within our third-party servicing portfolio increased $34.5 billion at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 . This increase was primarily due to bulk servicing right acquisitions and our originations and related loan sales activities. The decrease in the second lien forward mortgages, manufactured housing and other loans within our third-party servicing portfolio of $1.4 billion at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 was primarily due to run-off of the portfolio. The decrease in the unpaid principal balance of our on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages of $25.9 million at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 can be attributed to an increase in forward loans held for sale of $129.4 million offset by portfolio run-off of the assets held by the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts. At June 30, 2014 , we had $1.1 billion in unpaid principal balance associated with loans held for sale as compared to $976.8 million at December 31, 2013 . The annualized portfolio disappearance rate, consisting of contractual payments, voluntary prepayments, and defaults, was 13.52% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 .
The decrease of 1.82% in delinquencies associated with the first lien forward mortgages within our third-party servicing portfolio at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 was primarily due to current year servicing right acquisitions of better performing loans and newly originated mortgages resulting in lower on-average delinquencies than those of the portfolio at December 31, 2013 . The delinquencies associated with the second lien forward mortgages and manufactured housing within our third-party servicing portfolio decreased 0.97% and 0.05% at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 , respectively, primarily due to seasonality. In addition to seasonality, delinquencies associated with the other loans category decreased by 14.32% due to increased collections and liquidations for loans that transferred to our servicing portfolio during the three months ended December 2013. Delinquencies for our on-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with forward mortgages declined by 0.41% at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 due also to seasonality as well as lower real estate owned resulting primarily from reduced foreclosure volumes combined with favorable real estate owned liquidation trends resulting from continued strength in existing home sales in the southeastern U.S.

74



Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
A summary of net servicing revenue and fees for our Servicing segment is provided below (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing fees
$
174,906

 
$
145,425

 
$
29,481

 
$
342,287

 
$
267,281

 
$
75,006

Incentive and performance fees
25,571

 
26,319

 
(748
)
 
55,418

 
46,694

 
8,724

Ancillary and other fees
19,210

 
17,945

 
1,265

 
40,809

 
32,322

 
8,487

Servicing revenue and fees
219,687

 
189,689

 
29,998

 
438,514

 
346,297

 
92,217

Changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions (1)
(43,376
)
 
93,311

 
(136,687
)
 
(68,994
)
 
89,331

 
(158,325
)
Other changes in fair value (2)
(40,176
)
 
(28,234
)
 
(11,942
)
 
(62,192
)
 
(45,329
)
 
(16,863
)
Change in fair value of servicing rights
(83,552
)
 
65,077

 
(148,629
)
 
(131,186
)
 
44,002

 
(175,188
)
Amortization of servicing rights
(9,495
)

(10,334
)
 
839

 
(19,862
)
 
(20,740
)
 
878

Net servicing revenue and fees
$
126,640

 
$
244,432

 
$
(117,792
)
 
$
287,466

 
$
369,559

 
$
(82,093
)
_______
(1)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.
(2)
Represents the net change in the servicing rights carried at fair value due to the realization of expected cash flows over time.
Servicing fees increased primarily due to growth in the third-party servicing portfolio resulting mainly from bulk MSR portfolio acquisitions and servicing rights capitalized as a result of our loan origination activities, partially offset by normal run-off of the servicing portfolio. Additionally, $13.1 million of the increase during the six months ended June 30, 2014 resulted from a benefit due to the settlement of differences in views between a prior servicer and the Company on how certain fees were recognized under a contract. Average loans serviced increased by $35.1 billion , or 17% , and $38.7 billion , or 21% , for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively.
Incentive and performance fees include modification fees, fees earned under HAMP and other incentives. Modification fees and fees earned under HAMP increased by $2.9 million and $16.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due to a higher volume of completed modifications as well as successful maintenance of the modified loans under performing status. We also periodically receive incentive fees for exceeding pre-defined performance hurdles in servicing various loan portfolios. Performance driven incentive fees decreased $3.7 million and $8.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively.
Ancillary and other fees increased by $1.3 million and $ 8.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due to growth in the servicing portfolio. The change in fair value of servicing rights relate to the risk-managed forward loan class discussed below.
Provided below is a summary of the average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced and the related average servicing fee for our Servicing segment (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced (1)
 
$
236,727,134

 
$
201,609,332

 
$
35,117,802

 
$
220,415,578

 
$
181,728,875

 
$
38,686,703

Annualized average servicing fee  (2)
 
0.30
%
 
0.29
%
 
0.01
%
 
0.31
%
 
0.29
%
 
0.02
%
_______  
(1)
Average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced is calculated as the average of the average monthly unpaid principal balances.
(2)
Average servicing fee is calculated by dividing gross servicing fees by the average unpaid principal balance of loans serviced.
The increase in average servicing fee of two basis points earned for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 includes one basis point associated with a benefit of $13.1 million due to the settlement of differences in views between a prior servicer and the Company on how certain fees were recognized under a contract. This benefit did not exist in the prior year period.

75



Servicing Rights Carried at Fair Value
Changes in the fair value of servicing rights, which are driven by our quarterly re-estimation, have a significant effect on net servicing revenue and fees. As our servicing right balance grows, we expect that changes in fair value of servicing rights will have an increasing impact on our net income.
A summary of key economic inputs and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of servicing rights carried at fair value is presented below (dollars in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,  
 2013
Servicing rights at fair value
 
$
1,496,073

 
$
1,513,830

 
$
1,131,124

Unpaid principal balance of accounts serviced
 
161,917,557

 
164,433,072

 
130,123,288

Inputs and assumptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average remaining life in years
 
6.5

 
6.6

 
6.8

Weighted-average stated borrower interest rate on underlying collateral
 
4.87
%
 
5.00
%
 
5.20
%
Weighted-average discount rate
 
9.59
%
 
9.59
%
 
9.76
%
Conditional prepayment rate
 
8.05
%
 
7.54
%
 
7.06
%
Conditional default rate
 
2.44
%
 
2.68
%
 
2.90
%
At June 30, 2014 , servicing rights carried at fair value predominantly related to acquisitions completed since January 1, 2013, including bulk and flow MSR portfolio acquisitions and servicing rights capitalized as a result of our loan origination activities. The increase in servicing rights carried at fair value at June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 relates to $398.0 million in MSR portfolio acquisitions and $98.2 million in servicing rights capitalized upon sales of loans, partially offset by an unfavorable change in fair value. The unfavorable change in fair value of these servicing rights is attributed to $69.0 million in changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions and $62.2 million in other changes in fair value which reflect the impact on servicing rights for the realization of expected cash flows resulting from both regularly scheduled and unscheduled payments and payoffs of principal of loans.
The changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions of $43.4 million and $69.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , respectively, were due primarily to a higher assumed conditional prepayment rate at June 30, 2014 as compared to both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 which resulted primarily from a lower interest rate environment and an increase in the FHFA’s housing price index, partially offset by reductions in expected prepayment speeds on HARP refinanced loans. The decline in the assumed conditional default rate at June 30, 2014 as compared to both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was driven by new portfolio acquisitions that have lower risk profiles, and accordingly, lower assumed conditional default rates and discount rates. The weighted-average remaining life in years assumption declined at June 30, 2014 as compared to both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 due primarily to increased prepayment speeds related to lower interest rates.
The decline in changes in valuation inputs or other assumptions from gains in 2013 to losses in 2014 of $136.7 million and $158.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013, respectively, is primarily due to a lower interest rate environment in the current period, partially offset by an increase in FHFA’s house pricing index as well as lower overall delinquencies.
The growth in realization of expected cash flows of $11.9 million and $16.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, is due largely to a larger servicing portfolio as a result of current period acquisitions, including servicing rights acquired through loan sales with servicing retained, offset partially by changes to assumptions resulting in lower recognition of modeled cash flows. 
Other Revenues
Other revenues increased $8.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to $7.5 million in income for our beneficial interest in a servicing asset that did not exist in the prior year.
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses increased $33.7 million and $50.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, resulting primarily from additional costs associated with growth in the servicing portfolio, including a higher provision on advances of $15.0 million and $21.3 million during the same periods, respectively, resulting from a higher level of advances. In addition, there were $13.7 million and $16.4 million in higher legal

76



fees due to litigation and regulatory matters during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense increased $9.0 million and $16.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due to hiring to support the growth of our business including employees added in conjunction with the acquisition of certain assets of MetLife Bank, N.A. in March 2013 and hiring of EverBank employees in 2014. Headcount assigned directly to our Servicing segment increased by approximately 500 full-time employees from 3,100 at June 30, 2013 to 3,600 at June 30, 2014 .
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $5.5 million and $13.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, as a result of higher average balances of servicing advance liabilities, which are utilized to finance servicer and protective advances, due to growth of our servicing business as a result of the recent portfolio acquisitions.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings decreased by $15.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from higher expenses, offset partially by increased gross servicing revenues as discussed above. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings was also impacted by reductions in servicing rights fair value driven by changes in market assumptions resulting in a higher realization of expected cash flows which reduced gross servicing revenues.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings increased by $17.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from a larger growth in gross revenues in relation to higher expenses. Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings was also impacted by a higher realization of cash flows in 2014.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 resulting primarily from higher expenses, offset partially by increased gross servicing revenues as discussed above.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $45.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , resulting primarily from a larger growth in gross revenues in relation to higher expenses. The increase also resulted from $9.8 million in servicing fee economics related to MSRs associated with EverBank and those acquired from an affiliate of a large national bank.

77



Originations
Provided below is a summary of results of operations, Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA for our Originations segment (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net gains on sales of loans
 
$
144,611

 
$
235,699

 
$
(91,088
)
 
$
248,645

 
$
309,761

 
$
(61,116
)
Other revenues
 
5,688

 
15,527

 
(9,839
)
 
10,868

 
17,524

 
(6,656
)
Total revenues
 
150,299

 
251,226

 
(100,927
)
 
259,513

 
327,285

 
(67,772
)
Salaries and benefits
 
40,063

 
50,844

 
(10,781
)
 
83,299

 
75,432

 
7,867

General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
34,506

 
43,214

 
(8,708
)
 
68,446

 
58,043

 
10,403

Interest expense
 
6,627

 
8,600

 
(1,973
)
 
13,460

 
9,306

 
4,154

Depreciation and amortization
 
4,757

 
2,689

 
2,068

 
9,752

 
4,366

 
5,386

Total expenses
 
85,953

 
105,347

 
(19,394
)
 
174,957

 
147,147

 
27,810

Income before income taxes
 
64,346

 
145,879

 
(81,533
)
 
84,556

 
180,138

 
(95,582
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
2,443

 
1,933

 
510

 
5,296

 
3,210

 
2,086

Share-based compensation expense
 
1,157

 
885

 
272

 
1,986

 
1,153

 
833

Other
 
2,797

 

 
2,797

 
5,775

 

 
5,775

Total adjustments
 
6,397

 
2,818

 
3,579

 
13,057

 
4,363

 
8,694

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings
 
70,743

 
148,697

 
(77,954
)
 
97,613

 
184,501

 
(86,888
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
2,314

 
756

 
1,558

 
4,456

 
1,156

 
3,300

Other
 
(1,292
)
 
2,266

 
(3,558
)
 
(199
)
 
2,307

 
(2,506
)
Total adjustments
 
1,022

 
3,022

 
(2,000
)
 
4,257

 
3,463

 
794

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
71,765

 
$
151,719

 
$
(79,954
)
 
$
101,870

 
$
187,964

 
$
(86,094
)
The volume of our originations activity and changes in market rates primarily govern the fluctuations in revenues and expenses of our Originations segment. Locked applications were $3.4 billion at June 30, 2014 . Provided below is a summary of our locked volume, adjusted for anticipated loan funding probability, funded volume and sold volume by channel (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
Locked
Volume  (1)
 
Funded
Volume
 
Sold
Volume
 
Locked
Volume  (1)
 
Funded
Volume
 
Sold
Volume
Retention
$
2,524,473

 
$
2,256,564

 
$
2,033,924

 
$
3,660,095

 
$
2,965,251

 
$
2,114,401

Correspondent
3,004,149

 
2,053,077

 
1,756,367

 
1,543,246

 
957,399

 
693,350

Wholesale

 
11,528

 
43,692

 
667,257

 
522,532

 
328,187

Retail
23,487

 
29,950

 
23,857

 
276,122

 
280,669

 
222,705

Consumer Direct
4,794

 
394

 

 

 

 

Total
$
5,556,903

 
$
4,351,513

 
$
3,857,840

 
$
6,146,720

 
$
4,725,851

 
$
3,358,643

_______  
(1)
Volume has been adjusted by the percentage of mortgage loans not expected to close based on previous historical experience and change in interest rates.


78



 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
Locked
Volume
(1)
 
Funded
Volume
 
Sold
Volume
 
Locked
Volume
(1)
 
Funded
Volume
 
Sold
Volume
Retention
$
4,364,269

 
$
4,010,133

 
$
3,989,554

 
$
5,152,842

 
$
3,284,668

 
$
2,228,439

Correspondent
4,501,338

 
3,520,227

 
3,327,890

 
1,711,346

 
968,622

 
693,350

Wholesale
194,402

 
269,619

 
365,210

 
754,673

 
527,376

 
328,187

Retail
56,393

 
66,440

 
71,302

 
401,972

 
320,953

 
228,221

Consumer Direct
4,794

 
394

 

 

 

 

Total
$
9,121,196

 
$
7,866,813

 
$
7,753,956

 
$
8,020,833

 
$
5,101,619

 
$
3,478,197

_______  
(1)
Volume has been adjusted by the percentage of mortgage loans not expected to close based on previous historical experience and change in interest rates.
Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Net gains on sales of loans includes realized and unrealized gains and losses on loans, the initial fair value of the capitalized servicing rights upon loan sales, as well as the changes in fair value of our IRLCs and freestanding derivatives. The amount of net gains on sales of loans is a function of the volume of our originations activity. A substantial portion of our gain on sales of loans is recognized at the time we commit to originate or purchase a loan at specified terms as we recognize the value of the IRLC at the time of commitment. The fair value of the IRLC includes our estimate of the fair value of the MSR we expect to receive upon sale of the loan. We recognize loan origination costs as incurred, which typically aligns with the date of loan funding. These expenses are primarily included in general and administrative expenses and salaries and benefits on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
The volatility in the gain on sale spread is attributable to market pricing, which changes with demand, channel mix, and the general level of interest rates. While many factors may affect consumer demand for mortgages, generally, pricing competition on mortgage loans is lower in periods of low or declining interest rates, as consumer demand is greater. This provides opportunities for originators to increase volume and earn wider margins. Conversely, pricing competition increases when interest rates rise as consumer demand lessens. This reduces overall origination volume and may lead originators to reduced margins. The level and direction of interest rates however are not the sole determinant of consumer demand for mortgages and other factors such as secondary market conditions, home prices, credit spreads or legislative activity may impact consumer demand more significantly than interest rates in any given period.
Net gains on sales of loans for our Originations segment consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Realized gains on sales of loans
 
$
102,517

 
$
67,089

 
$
35,428

 
$
189,350

 
$
71,287

 
$
118,063

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on loans held for sale
 
23,353

 
(15,897
)
 
39,250

 
19,177

 
(2,271
)
 
21,448

Gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments
 
37,969

 
(17,217
)
 
55,186

 
36,363

 
41,404

 
(5,041
)
Gains (losses) on forward sales commitments (1)
 
(63,956
)
 
183,625

 
(247,581
)
 
(99,812
)
 
179,688

 
(279,500
)
Losses on MBS purchase commitments (1)
 
(7,709
)
 
(24,662
)
 
16,953

 
(7,642
)
 
(24,662
)
 
17,020

Capitalized servicing rights
 
45,554

 
36,305

 
9,249

 
98,167

 
37,595

 
60,572

Provision for repurchases
 
(1,838
)
 
(2,008
)
 
170

 
(4,024
)
 
(2,169
)
 
(1,855
)
Interest income
 
8,721

 
8,464

 
257

 
17,066

 
8,889

 
8,177

Net gains on sales of loans
 
$
144,611

 
$
235,699

 
$
(91,088
)
 
$
248,645

 
$
309,761

 
$
(61,116
)
_______  
(1)
Realized gains (losses) on hedging activities were $(44.1) million and $25.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and $(64.4) million and $25.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.

The decrease in net gains on sales of loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 is due primarily to the effect of the change in locked volume; a shift in volume from the higher margin retention channel to the lower margin correspondent channel; and reduced fair value of servicing rights included in IRLCs and loans held for sale. Locked volume was lower during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 . This, along with unfavorable changes in product mix contributed to the decline in gains on sales of loans. Higher locked volume during the six months ended June

79



30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 , which resulted from having a full six months of activity in 2014 as opposed to a condensed period in 2013, was more than offset by the unfavorable change in product mix and reduced fair value of servicing rights included in IRLCs. The condensed period in 2013 results from the acquisition of the capital markets and originations platforms from ResCap on January 31, 2013 and the correspondent lending business from Ally Bank on March 1, 2013.
Other Revenues
Other revenues, which consists primarily of origination fee income and interest on cash equivalents, decreased $9.8 million and $6.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, primarily as a result of lower fees charged to borrowers refinancing loans.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense decreased $10.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to a reduction in workforce in order to align the employee base to match the scope and scale of current operations which included our exit from the mortgage wholesale channel.
Salaries and benefits expense increased $7.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of the ramp-up in business following the acquisitions during the first quarter of 2013 described above.
General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses decreased $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to the decline in funded volume and the management of expenses to align with the scope and scale of current operations.
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses increased $10.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of the ramp-up in business following the acquisitions during the first quarter of 2013 described above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to lower average balances outstanding on master repurchase agreements as a result of a lower volume of loan fundings as well as lower average cost of debt.
Interest expense increased $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 as a result of higher average balances outstanding on master repurchase agreements due to higher volume of loan fundings offset partially by lower average cost of debt.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings decreased $78.0 million and $86.9 million and Adjusted EBITDA decreased $80.0 million and $86.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to reduced net gains on sales of loans. The decline in net gains on sales of loans for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 was partially offset by lower expenses related to both reduced funded volume and cost saving initiatives. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the business substantially ramped up operations due to first quarter 2013 acquisitions; therefore locked volume was significantly larger than funded volume. As a result, the six months ended June 30, 2013 had higher revenues in relation to expenses. In the current year period, the relationship of locked volume to funded volume normalized.


80



Reverse Mortgage
Provided below is a summary of results of operations, Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) and Adjusted EBITDA for our Reverse Mortgage segment (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
$
26,936

 
$
26,731

 
$
205

 
$
44,172

 
$
63,519

 
$
(19,347
)
Net servicing revenue and fees
 
8,777

 
6,624

 
2,153

 
16,387

 
13,372

 
3,015

Net gains on sales of loans
 

 
250

 
(250
)
 

 
4,633

 
(4,633
)
Other revenues
 
3,005

 
2,366

 
639

 
6,027

 
5,311

 
716

Total revenues
 
38,718

 
35,971

 
2,747

 
66,586

 
86,835

 
(20,249
)
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses
 
21,478

 
22,335

 
(857
)
 
38,649

 
37,533

 
1,116

Salaries and benefits
 
18,361

 
18,318

 
43

 
35,394

 
35,643

 
(249
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
2,302

 
2,691

 
(389
)
 
4,751

 
5,414

 
(663
)
Interest expense
 
775

 
2,166

 
(1,391
)
 
1,634

 
5,695

 
(4,061
)
Goodwill impairment
 
82,269

 

 
82,269

 
82,269

 

 
82,269

Other expenses, net
 
164

 
278

 
(114
)
 
320

 
278

 
42

Total expenses
 
125,349

 
45,788

 
79,561

 
163,017

 
84,563

 
78,454

Income (loss) before income taxes
 
(86,631
)
 
(9,817
)
 
(76,814
)
 
(96,431
)
 
2,272

 
(98,703
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill impairment
 
82,269

 

 
82,269

 
82,269

 

 
82,269

Fair value to cash adjustment for reverse loans
 
(5,883
)
 
16,886

 
(22,769
)
 
(1,222
)
 
20,422

 
(21,644
)
Step-up depreciation and amortization
 
1,781

 
2,353

 
(572
)
 
3,674

 
4,804

 
(1,130
)
Transaction and integration costs
 
3,500

 

 
3,500

 
3,500

 

 
3,500

Share-based compensation expense
 
829

 
436

 
393

 
1,319

 
723

 
596

Other
 
407

 
6,000

 
(5,593
)
 
355

 
6,000

 
(5,645
)
Total adjustments
 
82,903

 
25,675

 
57,228

 
89,895

 
31,949

 
57,946

Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss)
 
(3,728
)
 
15,858

 
(19,586
)
 
(6,536
)
 
34,221

 
(40,757
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of servicing rights
 
693

 
875

 
(182
)
 
1,443

 
1,793

 
(350
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
521

 
338

 
183

 
1,077

 
610

 
467

Non-cash interest income
 
(32
)
 
(135
)
 
103

 
(97
)
 
(286
)
 
189

Interest expense on debt
 
8

 
9

 
(1
)
 
18

 
26

 
(8
)
Other
 
(14
)
 
(51
)
 
37

 
54

 
(14
)
 
68

Total adjustments
 
1,176

 
1,036

 
140

 
2,495

 
2,129

 
366

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
(2,552
)
 
$
16,894

 
$
(19,446
)
 
$
(4,041
)
 
$
36,350

 
$
(40,391
)

81



Reverse Mortgage Servicing Portfolio
Provided below are summaries of the activity in our third-party servicing portfolio for our reverse mortgage business, which includes accounts serviced for third parties for which we earn servicing revenue and, thus, excludes servicing performed related to residential loans and real estate owned that have been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets, as the reverse loan transfer was accounted for as a secured borrowing (dollars in thousands):
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30, 2014
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Total
 
Number
of Accounts
 
Total
Unpaid principal balance of accounts associated with our reverse loan third-party servicing portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
44,663

 
$
7,690,304

 
42,855

 
$
7,454,306

New business added
 
4,084

 
509,546

 
293

 
54,029

Other additions (1)
 

 
232,887

 

 
214,486

Payoffs, sales and curtailments
 
(1,696
)
 
(347,301
)
 
(1,679
)
 
(407,651
)
Ending balance
 
47,051

 
$
8,085,436

 
41,469

 
$
7,315,170

_________
(1)
Other additions include additions to the principal balance serviced related to interest, servicing fees, mortgage insurance and advances owed by the existing borrower.
Provided below is a summary of the number of accounts, unpaid principal balance and weighted average contractual servicing fee rate related to our servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages (dollars in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
 
Number of
Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual
Servicing Fee
Third-party servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
47,051

 
$
8,085,436

 
0.16
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with reverse mortgages
 
56,493

 
8,801,460

 
 
Total servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
103,544

 
$
16,886,896

 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Number of
Accounts
 
Unpaid Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average
Contractual
Servicing Fee
Third-party servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
44,663

 
$
7,690,304

 
0.16
%
On-balance sheet residential loans and real estate owned associated with reverse mortgages
 
52,196

 
8,167,516

 
 
Total servicing portfolio associated with reverse mortgages
 
$
96,859

 
$
15,857,820

 
 

82



Net Fair Value Gains on Reverse Loans and Related HMBS Obligations
Provided in the table below is a summary of the components of net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations which are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Net fair value gains (losses) on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income on reverse loans
 
$
98,258

 
$
86,514

 
$
11,744

 
$
195,139

 
$
163,781

 
$
31,358

Change in fair value of reverse loans
 
(8,687
)
 
14,570

 
(23,257
)
 
99,841

 
16,108

 
83,733

Net fair value gains on reverse loans
 
89,571

 
101,084

 
(11,513
)
 
294,980

 
179,889

 
115,091

Interest expense on HMBS related obligations
 
(91,470
)
 
(79,545
)
 
(11,925
)
 
(182,030
)
 
(149,220
)
 
(32,810
)
Change in fair value of HMBS related obligations
 
28,835

 
5,192

 
23,643

 
(68,778
)
 
32,850

 
(101,628
)
Net fair value losses on HMBS related obligations
 
(62,635
)
 
(74,353
)
 
11,718

 
(250,808
)
 
(116,370
)
 
(134,438
)
Net fair value gains on reverse loans and related HMBS obligations
 
$
26,936

 
$
26,731

 
$
205

 
$
44,172

 
$
63,519

 
$
(19,347
)
Net contractual interest declined by $0.2 million and $1.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to an increase in due and payable reverse loans which have a lower interest rate than those loans that are active. Cash generated by origination, purchase and securitization of HECMs included in the change in fair value decreased by $22.4 million and $39.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, primarily as a result of lower new origination volume, partially offset by a higher volume of securitizations of borrower draws on existing reverse loans. Total securitization volume for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to 2013 declined by 55% . Non-cash fair value gains included in the change in fair value increased by $22.8 million and $21.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due to the change in market pricing for newly securitized HECMs and HMBS.
Net Servicing Revenue and Fees
Net servicing revenue and fees for the reverse mortgage business consists of contractual servicing fees and ancillary and other fees related to our third-party reverse mortgage portfolio offset by amortization of servicing rights. The growth in net servicing revenue and fees of $2.2 million and $3.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, was due primarily to the growth in the servicing portfolio and an increase in incentive and performance fees, primarily real estate owned management fees. A summary of net servicing revenue and fees for our Reverse Mortgage segment is provided below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Servicing fees
 
$
3,233

 
$
2,792

 
$
441

 
$
6,450

 
$
5,657

 
$
793

Incentive and performance fees
 
5,380

 
4,097

 
1,283

 
9,486

 
7,497

 
1,989

Ancillary and other fees
 
857

 
610

 
247

 
1,894

 
2,011

 
(117
)
Servicing revenue and fees
 
9,470

 
7,499

 
1,971

 
17,830

 
15,165

 
2,665

Amortization of servicing rights
 
(693
)
 
(875
)
 
182

 
(1,443
)
 
(1,793
)
 
350

Net servicing revenue and fees
 
$
8,777

 
$
6,624

 
$
2,153

 
$
16,387

 
$
13,372

 
$
3,015

Net Gains on Sales of Loans
Beginning in May 2013, we no longer sell reverse loans to third parties and all reverse loans purchased and originated are securitized by RMS and as such remain on the consolidated balance sheet as collateral for HMBS related obligations. No gain or loss is recognized upon securitization of reverse loans. As a result, there were no gains on sales of loans recognized by our Reverse Mortgage segment subsequent to April 30, 2013.

83



General and Administrative and Allocated Indirect Expenses
General and administrative and allocated indirect expenses decreased $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 and increased $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013 . The decrease in expenses during the three month period ended June 30, 2014 was due primarily to the $5.5 million provision in the prior year period for our curtailment obligation liability partially offset by the an increase in transaction costs resulting from an unsuccessful acquisition of $3.5 million in the current year and an increase of $1.1 million in the provision for uncollectible advances resulting from the aging of the advances. The increase in expenses during the six month period ended June 30, 2014 was due primarily to the transaction costs discussed above of $3.5 million in the current year and an increase of $3.6 million in the provision for uncollectible advances resulting from the aging of the advances, which were partially offset by $6.0 million for the provision associated with our curtailment obligation liability in the prior year period.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $1.4 million and $4.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to lower average borrowings on master repurchase agreements resulting from a lower amount of unsecuritized HECMs and lower cost of debt.
Goodwill Impairment
We incurred a $82.3 million impairment charge as a result of a goodwill evaluation performed in the second quarter of 2014 . The evaluation indicated the estimated implied fair value of the Reverse Mortgage reporting unit’s goodwill was less than its book value, therefore requiring the impairment charge. Refer to Note 12 in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) and Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) decreased by $19.6 million and $40.8 million and Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $19.4 million and $40.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively. The decrease in these Non-GAAP measures was due to primarily to the decline in cash gains discussed above.
Other Non-Reportable
Other Revenues
Other revenues for our Other non-reportable segment consist primarily of asset management performance fees, and to a lesser extent, other interest income. Other revenues increased $32.9 million and $31.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to $34.2 million in asset management performance fees collected and earned in connection with the investment management of a fund during the current quarter.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for our Other non-reportable segment relates to our corporate debt. Interest expense on corporate debt increased $6.3 million and $17.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , respectively, due primarily to a higher average balance of our corporate debt due to corporate debt transactions throughout 2013. These transactions increased average corporate debt by $527.7 million and $680.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same periods of 2013 , and included incremental borrowings under our 2012 Term Loan and related subsequent refinancing activities under our 2013 Term Loan and the issuance of our Senior Notes. The increase in the average balance of our corporate debt was partially offset by a decrease in the average rate of 0.52% and 0.56% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 in comparison to 2013 , respectively, related to the financing transactions which resulted in a lower cost of debt.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay debt and meet the financial obligations of our operations including funding acquisitions; forward and reverse loan servicing advances; obligations associated with the repurchase of reverse loans from securitization pools; funding additional borrowing capacity on reverse loans; origination of mortgage loans; and other general business needs, including the cost of changes to legislation and related rules. Our liquidity is measured as our and our subsidiaries’ cash and cash equivalents excluding subsidiary minimum cash requirement balances, which are typically associated with our servicing or financing agreements with third parties. This measure also includes our borrowing capacity available under the 2013 Revolver, as described under the Corporate Debt section below. At June 30, 2014 , our liquidity was

84



$364.8 million . At June 30, 2014 , we had earmarked approximately $120 million of our liquidity to fund previously announced acquisitions of MSRs, including related servicer and protective advances, as well as $20 million for our capital contribution to WCO.
Our policy is to maintain our liquidity at a level sufficient to fund certain known or expected payments and to fund our working capital needs. Our principal sources of liquidity are the cash flows generated from our Servicing and Originations segments and funds available from our 2013 Revolver, master repurchase agreements, forward loan servicing advance facilities, issuance of HMBS and sales of excess servicing spread.
We believe that, based on current forecasts and anticipated market conditions, our current liquidity, along with the funds generated from our principal sources of liquidity discussed above, will allow for financial flexibility to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund operating needs and expenses, servicing advances, loan originations, planned capital expenditures, current committed business and asset acquisitions, and all required debt service obligations for the next 12 months. We expect to generate adequate cash flows to fund our operations principally from our servicing and origination operations and expect to fund future growth opportunities with capital obtained from external sources. Our operating cash flows and liquidity are significantly influenced by numerous factors, including interest rates and continued availability of financing, including the renewal of existing forward loan servicing advance facilities and forward and reverse loan master repurchase agreements. We may access the capital markets from time to time to augment our liquidity position as our business dictates, which includes our ability to offer and sell securities under our shelf registration statement described below. We continually monitor our cash flows and liquidity in order to be responsive to these changing conditions.
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC for an indeterminate number of securities that is effective for three years (expires February 6, 2015), after which time we expect to be able to file another shelf registration statement that would be in place for another three year term. Under this universal shelf registration statement, we have the capacity to offer and sell from time to time securities, including common stock, debt securities, preferred stock, warrants and units.
Forward Mortgage Servicing Business
Our servicing agreements impose on us various rights and obligations that affect our liquidity. Among the most significant of these obligations is the requirement that we advance our own funds to meet contractual payment requirements for investors and to pay taxes, insurance and foreclosure costs and various other items, referred to as protective advances, which are required to preserve the collateral underlying the residential loans being serviced. In the normal course of business, we borrow money from various counterparties who provide us with financing to fund a portion of our forward loan related servicing advances on a short-term basis or provide for reimbursement within an agreed-upon period. Our ability to fund servicing advances is a significant factor that affects our liquidity and we depend upon our ability to secure these types of arrangements on acceptable terms and to renew or replace existing financing facilities as they expire. However there can be no assurance that these facilities will be available to us in the future. The servicing advance financing agreements that support our servicing operations are discussed below.
Servicing Advance Facilities
Our subsidiaries have servicing advance facilities with several lenders and an Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae which, in each case, are used to fund certain principal and interest, servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of certain subsidiaries under certain servicing agreements. The servicing advance facilities and the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement had an aggregate capacity amount of $1.2 billion at June 30, 2014 . The interest rates on these facilities and the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement are primarily based on LIBOR plus between 1.25% and 5.5% and have various expiration dates through July 2015 . Payments on the amounts due under these agreements are paid from the recoveries or repayment by third party borrowers of underlying advances made by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, repayment of the facilities and amounts due under the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement are dependent on the recoveries or repayments by third party borrowers that are received on the underlying advances associated with the agreements. We had $111.6 million outstanding under the servicing advance facilities at June 30, 2014 . At June 30, 2014 we had borrowings of $928.9 million under the Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement which has a capacity of $950.0 million.

Green Tree Servicing's Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae is used exclusively to fund certain principal and interest, servicer and protective advances that are the responsibility of Green Tree Servicing under its Fannie Mae servicing agreements. The Fannie Mae Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement expires on March 31, 2015 . If not renewed, there will be no additional funding by Fannie Mae of new advances under the agreement. In addition, collections recovered during the 18 months following the expiration of the agreement are to be remitted to Fannie Mae to settle any remaining outstanding balance due under such agreement. Upon expiration of the 18 month period, any remaining balance would become due and payable.

The Early Advance Reimbursement Agreement with Fannie Mae also includes certain “Stop Events,” such as: (i) the failure of Green Tree Servicing to comply with the terms of the agreement; (ii) the failure of Green Tree Servicing to be an approved Fannie Mae

85



servicer; and (iii) the occurrence of an event of default under Green Tree Servicing’s mortgage selling and servicing contract or any master agreement with Fannie Mae which has not been waived by Fannie Mae or cured as may be allowed under the applicable agreement. Fannie Mae may also declare a “Stop Event” 120 days after providing Green Tree Servicing with written notice of its intent to do so. Were a Stop Event to occur and not be waived by Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae would have the option to terminate the Servicing Advance Reimbursement Agreement. In the event Fannie Mae elected to terminate the Servicing Advance Reimbursement Agreement, collections recovered during the 18 months following the occurrence of the Stop Event would be required to be remitted to Fannie Mae to settle any remaining outstanding balance due under such agreement. Upon expiration of the 18 month period, any remaining balance would become due and payable.

The servicing advance agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants most sensitive to our operating results and financial position are the requirements that certain of its subsidiaries maintain minimum tangible net worth, indebtedness to tangible net worth and minimum liquidity. During the first quarter of 2014, the Receivables Loan Agreement was amended to remove the covenant relating to the Company's requirement to maintain a minimum annual net cash provided by operating activities and to add other customary financial covenants, including indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity. Our subsidiaries were in compliance with these financial covenants at June 30, 2014.
Reverse Mortgage Servicing Business
Similar to our forward mortgage servicing business, our servicing agreements impose on us obligations to advance our own funds to meet contractual payment requirements for investors and to pay protective advances, which are required to preserve the collateral underlying the residential loans being serviced. We rely upon operating cash flows to fund these obligations.
Ginnie Mae Buyout Facility
As an HMBS issuer, we assume certain obligations related to each security issued. As discussed below, the most significant obligation is the requirement to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance of the related HECM is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount.
In March 2014, we entered into a revolving line of credit facility for the repurchase of HECM loans. The facility has a committed capacity of $25.0 million . The interest rate on this facility is based on the prime rate plus 0.50% . The maturity date of this facility is February 28, 2015 . Borrowings under this facility are secured by the underlying HECMs. We had $19.3 million of borrowings and $24.2 million of collateral pledged under this facility at June 30, 2014 . Borrowings at June 30, 2014 are classified as borrowings under master repurchase agreements within warehouse borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet.
Forward Mortgage Originations Business
Master Repurchase Agreements
We utilize master repurchase agreements to support our origination or purchase of forward loans. These agreements were entered into by Green Tree Servicing and Ditech. The facilities had an aggregate capacity of $2.0 billion at June 30, 2014 . At June 30, 2014 , the interest rates on the facilities were primarily based on LIBOR plus between 2.10% and 2.95% and have various expiration dates through May 2015 . These facilities provide creditors a security interest in the mortgage loans that meet the eligibility requirements under the terms of the particular facility in exchange for cash proceeds used to originate or purchase forward loans. The source of repayment of these facilities is typically from the sale or securitization of the underlying loans into the secondary mortgage market. We evaluate our needs under these facilities based on forecasted mortgage loan origination volume, however, there can be no assurance that these origination funding facilities will be available to us in the future. The aggregate capacity includes $1.15 billion of committed funds and $850.0 million of uncommitted funds. To the extent uncommitted funds are requested to purchase or originate mortgage loans, the counterparties have no obligation to fulfill such request. All obligations of Green Tree Servicing and Ditech under the master repurchase agreements are guaranteed by the Company. We had $1.06 billion of borrowings under these master repurchase agreements at June 30, 2014 , which included $94.5 million of borrowings utilizing uncommitted funds.

All of our master repurchase agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants that are most sensitive to the operating results and resulting financial position are minimum tangible net worth requirements, indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity and profitability requirements. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at June 30, 2014 .
Representations and Warranties
In conjunction with our originations business, we provide representations and warranties on loan sales. We sell substantially all of our originated or purchased forward loans into the secondary market for securitization or to private investors as whole loans. We sell

86



conventional conforming and government-backed forward loans through agency-sponsored securitizations in which mortgage-backed securities are created and sold to third-party investors. We also sell non-conforming forward loans to private investors. In doing so, representations and warranties regarding certain attributes of the loans are made to the third-party investor. Subsequent to the sale, if it is determined that the loans sold are in breach of these representations or warranties, we generally have an obligation to either: (i) repurchase the loan for the unpaid principal balance, accrued interest, and related advances, (ii) indemnify the purchaser, or (iii) make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of the loan.
Our representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits of exposure. However, we believe that the current unpaid principal balance of loans sold by the Company to date represents the maximum exposure to repurchases related to representations and warranties.
Our obligations vary based upon the nature of the repurchase demand and the current status of the residential loan. Our estimate of the liability associated with representations and warranties exposure is recorded in payables and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. A rollforward of this liability is included below (in thousands):
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30,
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
11,176

 
$
439

 
$
9,135

 
$
395

Provision for new sales
 
1,838

 
2,010

 
4,024

 
2,181

Provision for change in estimate of existing reserves
 
(2,591
)
 

 
(2,736
)
 

Net realized losses on repurchases
 
(162
)
 
(200
)
 
(162
)
 
(327
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
10,261

 
$
2,249

 
$
10,261

 
$
2,249

A rollforward of loan repurchase requests is included below (dollars in thousands). Activity during 2013 was insignificant.
 
 
For the Three Months  
 Ended June 30, 2014
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
No. of Loans
 
Unpaid Principal Balance
 
No. of Loans
 
Unpaid Principal Balance
Balance at beginning of period
 
2

 
$
280

 
10

 
$
2,324

Repurchases and indemnifications
 
(3
)
 
(917
)
 
(3
)
 
(917
)
Claims initiated
 
33

 
9,045

 
35

 
9,325

Rescinded
 
(19
)
 
(4,972
)
 
(29
)
 
(7,296
)
Balance at end of period
 
13

 
$
3,436

 
13

 
$
3,436


Reverse Mortgage Origination Business
Master Repurchase Agreements
Through RMS we finance the origination or purchase of reverse loans through master repurchase agreements. The facilities have an aggregate capacity amount of $250.0 million . The interest rates on the facilities are primarily based on LIBOR plus between 2.38% and 3.25% , in some cases are subject to a LIBOR floor or other minimum rates and have various expiration dates through July 2015 . These facilities are secured by the underlying originated or purchased reverse loans and provide creditors a security interest in the reverse loans that meet the eligibility requirements under the terms of the particular facility. The source of repayment of these facilities is from the securitization of the underlying reverse loans and sale of the HMBS through Ginnie Mae as discussed in the section below. We evaluate our needs under these facilities based on forecasted reverse loan origination volume; however, there can be no assurance that these origination funding facilities will be available to us in the future. The aggregate capacity of $250.0 million is uncommitted. To the extent uncommitted funds are requested to purchase or originate reverse loans, the counterparties have no obligation to fulfill such request. All obligations of RMS under the master repurchase agreements are guaranteed by the Company. We had $70.4 million of borrowings under these master repurchase agreements at June 30, 2014 .
All of our master repurchase agreements contain customary events of default and covenants, the most significant of which are financial covenants. Financial covenants that are most sensitive to the operating results and resulting financial position are minimum tangible net worth requirements, indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio requirements, and minimum liquidity and profitability requirements.

87



At June 30, 2014 , absent a waiver received from its counterparty, RMS would not have been in compliance with its minimum profitability covenant contained in one of its master repurchase agreements. In July 2014, RMS obtained waivers of compliance effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and the quarters ending September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The waiver of compliance for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 waived certain rights and remedies that otherwise would have been available under the master repurchase agreement and confirmed that no default or event of default had occurred. The waiver of compliance for the quarters ending September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 are conditioned on RMS being in compliance with all other covenants set forth in the master repurchase agreement and related documents. So long as RMS is in compliance with all other covenants within the master repurchase agreement and related documents, the waiver of compliance waives certain rights and remedies that otherwise would have been available under the master repurchase agreement and confirms that no default or event of default had occurred.  As a result of the waiver obtained by RMS relating to the quarter ended June 30, 2014, RMS was in compliance with its financial covenants at June 30, 2014.
Reverse Loan Securitizations
We fund reverse loans through the Ginnie Mae HMBS issuance process. The proceeds from the transfer of the HMBS are accounted for as a secured borrowing and are classified on the consolidated balance sheet as HMBS related obligations. The proceeds from the transfer are used to repay borrowings under our master repurchase agreements. At June 30, 2014 , we had $8.6 billion in unpaid principal balance outstanding on the HMBS related obligations. At June 30, 2014 , $8.6 billion of reverse loans and real estate owned was pledged as collateral to the HMBS beneficial interest holders, and are not available to satisfy the claims of our creditors. Ginnie Mae, as guarantor of the HMBS, is obligated to the holders of the HMBS in an instance of RMS default on its servicing obligations, or when the proceeds realized on HECMs are insufficient to repay all outstanding HMBS related obligations. Ginnie Mae has recourse to RMS to the extent of the collateralized participation interests in the HECMs, but does not have recourse to the general assets of the Company, except for obligations as servicer.
Borrower remittances received on the reverse loans, if any, and proceeds received from the sale of real estate owned and our funds used to repurchase reverse loans are used to reduce the HMBS related obligations by making payments to Ginnie Mae, who will then remit the payments to the holders of the HMBS. The maturity of the HMBS related obligations is directly affected by the liquidation of the reverse loans or liquidation of real estate owned and events of default as stipulated in the reverse loan agreements with borrowers.
HMBS Issuer Obligations
As an HMBS issuer, we assume certain obligations related to each security issued. The most significant obligation is the requirement to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance of the related HECM is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount. Performing repurchased loans are conveyed to HUD, and nonperforming repurchased loans are generally liquidated through foreclosure and subsequent sale of real estate owned. Loans are considered nonperforming upon events such as, but not limited to, the death of the mortgagor, the mortgagor no longer occupying the property as their principal residence, or the property taxes or insurance not being paid. We rely upon our Ginnie Mae Buyout Facility and operating cash flows, to the extent necessary, to repurchase loans. The timing and amount of our obligation to repurchase HECMs is indeterminable as repurchase is predicated on certain factors, the most significant of which is whether or not a borrower event of default occurs prior to the HECM reaching the mandatory repurchase threshold under which we are obligated to repurchase the loan.
Unfunded Commitments
We, as servicer of reverse loans, are obligated to fund additional borrowing capacity in the form of undrawn lines of credit on floating rate and fixed rate reverse loans. We rely upon our operating cash flows to fund these additional borrowings on a short-term basis prior to securitization (when performing services of the both the issuer and servicer) or reimbursement by the issuer (when providing third-party servicing). The additional fundings made by us, as issuer and servicer, are generally securitized within 30 days after funding. Similarly, the additional fundings made by us, as third-party servicer, are typically reimbursed by the issuer within 30 days after funding. Our commitment to fund additional borrowing capacity was $905.8 million at June 30, 2014 . The obligation to fund these additional borrowings could have a significant impact on our liquidity.
Corporate Debt
Term Loans and Revolver
At January 1, 2013, we had our $700 million 2012 Term Loan outstanding and our $125 million 2012 Revolver.
We entered into several amendments to the 2012 Term Loan during 2013. These amendments provided for, among other things, an increase to certain financial ratios that govern our ability to incur additional indebtedness and incremental secured term loans of $1.1 billion in the aggregate.

88



On December 19, 2013, we refinanced our 2012 Term Loan with the $1.5 billion 2013 Term Loan, and refinanced our 2012 Revolver with a $125 million 2013 Revolver.
Our obligations under the 2013 Secured Credit Facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of our subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of our assets and substantially all assets of the guarantor subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions such as the assets of the consolidated Residual and Non-Residual Trusts and the residential loans and real estate owned of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools that have been recorded in our consolidated balance sheets.
The material terms of our 2013 Secured Credit Facilities are summarized in the table below:
Debt Agreement
 
Interest Rate
 
Amortization
 
Maturity/Expiration
$1.5 billion 2013 Term Loan
 
LIBOR plus 3.75%
LIBOR floor of 1.00%

 
1.00% per annum beginning 1st quarter of 2014; remainder at final maturity
 
December 18, 2020
$125 million 2013 Revolver
 
LIBOR plus 3.75%
 
Bullet payment at maturity
 
December 19, 2018
An amount of up to $25.0 million under the 2013 Revolver is available to be used for the issuance of LOCs. Any amounts outstanding in issued LOCs reduce availability for cash borrowings under the 2013 Revolver. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 , there were no borrowings or repayments under the 2013 Revolver. At June 30, 2014 , we had $0.3 million outstanding in an issued LOC with remaining availability under the 2013 Revolver of $124.7 million . The commitment fee on the unused portion of the 2013 Revolver is 0.50% per year.
The 2013 Secured Credit Facilities contain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase the Company’s capital stock, make certain types of investments, create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to the Company from its restricted subsidiaries, incur certain liens, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and consolidate or merge with or into, or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to, another person. These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. The 2013 Secured Credit Facilities also contain customary events of default, including the failure to make timely payments on the 2013 Term Loan and 2013 Revolver or other material indebtedness, the failure to satisfy certain covenants and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency. We were in compliance with all covenants contained in our 2013 Secured Credit Facilities at June 30, 2014 .
Senior Notes
In December 2013, we completed the sale of the $575.0 million Senior Notes, which generated cash proceeds of $561.3 million after debt issuance costs. We used the net proceeds to make deposits on the acquisition of MSRs, to repay $300.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under our then existing 2012 Term Loan, to pay related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The Senior Notes pay interest semi-annually at an interest rate of 7.875% accruing from December 17, 2013 with payments commencing in June 2014. The Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2021. The Senior Notes were offered and sold in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements under the Securities Act, and resold to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of December 17, 2013, among the Company, the guarantor parties thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of our current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantee our obligations under our 2013 Term Loan.
On or prior to December 15, 2016, we may on any one or more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at 107.875% of their aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption date. Prior to December 15, 2016, we may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at a make-whole premium plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the redemption date.
On or after December 15, 2016, we may on any one or more occasions redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 105.906% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the redemption date, such optional redemption prices decreasing to 103.938% on or after December 15, 2017, 101.969% on or after December 15, 2018 and 100.000% on or after December 15, 2019.
If a change of control occurs, the holders of our Senior Notes may require that we purchase with cash all or a portion of these Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
The Senior Notes Indenture contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase the Company’s capital

89



stock, make certain types of investments, create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to the Company from its restricted subsidiaries, incur certain liens, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and consolidate or merge with or into, or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to, another person. These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. The Senior Notes Indenture also contains customary events of default, including the failure to make timely payments on the Senior Notes or other material indebtedness, the failure to satisfy certain covenants and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency.
On December 17, 2013, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the guarantors and Barclays Capital Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers named therein. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company and the guarantors agreed to use their commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act so as to allow holders of the Senior Notes to exchange their Senior Notes for the same principal amount of a new issue of notes, or the Exchange Notes, with identical terms, except that the Exchange Notes will not be subject to certain restrictions on transfer or to any increase in annual interest rate. If the exchange offer is not completed on or before the date that is 365 days after December 17, 2013, we will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the Senior Notes. We were in compliance with all covenants contained in the Senior Notes Indenture at June 30, 2014.
Convertible Notes
In October 2012, we closed on a registered underwritten public offering of $290.0 million Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes pay interest semi-annually on May 1 and November 1, commencing on May 1, 2013, at a rate of 4.50% per year, and mature on November 1, 2019. 
Prior to May 1, 2019, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only upon specified events and during specified periods, and, on or after May 1, 2019, at any time. The Convertible Notes will initially be convertible at a conversion rate of 17.0068 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $58.80 per share. Upon conversion, we may pay or deliver, at our option, cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock. It is our intent to settle all conversions through combination settlement, which involves repayment of an amount of cash equal to the principal amount and any excess of conversion value over the principal amount in shares of common stock.
We generated net proceeds of approximately $280.4 million from the Convertible Notes after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. We used the net proceeds from the Convertible Notes, together with cash on hand, to repay and terminate $265.0 million outstanding under our 2011 Second Lien Term Loan and to pay certain fees, expenses and premiums in connection therewith.
As market conditions warrant, we may from time to time, subject to limitations as stated in our 2013 Secured Credit Facilities, repurchase debt securities issued by us, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.
Residual and Non-Residual Trusts
The cash proceeds from the repayment of the collateral held in the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts are owned by the trusts and serve to only repay the obligations of the trusts unless, for the Residual Trusts, certain overcollateralization or other similar targets are satisfied, in which case, the excess cash is released to us assuming no triggering event has occurred.
The Residual Trusts, with the exception of Trust 2011-1 contain delinquency and loss triggers, that, if exceeded, allocate any excess cash flows to paying down the outstanding mortgage-backed notes for that particular trust at an accelerated pace. Assuming no servicer triggering events have occurred and the overcollateralization targets have been met, any excess cash from these trusts is released to us. For Trust 2011-1, principal and interest payments are not paid on the subordinate note or residual interests, which are held by us, until all amounts due on the senior notes are fully paid.

90



Since January 2008 and February 2014, respectively, Trust 2006-1 and Trust VII have exceeded certain triggers and have not provided any excess cash flow to us. However, in April 2014, Trust 2006-1 passed the delinquency rate trigger while Trust VII began to pass the cumulative loss rate trigger. Nonetheless, Trust 2006-1 continued to fail the cumulative loss rate trigger and, therefore, can not provide excess cash flow to us. However, residual cash flow from Trust VII is allowed to flow to us. In addition, from September 2012 to February 2013, Trust 2005-1 exceeded the delinquency trigger level of 8.00% . At March 31, 2013, the delinquency rate for Trust 2005-1 was cured and remains cured at June 30, 2014 allowing residual cash flows to now flow to us. Provided below is a table summarizing the unpaid principal balance of the outstanding mortgage-backed debt and the actual delinquency and cumulative loss rates in comparison to the trigger rates for our Residual Trusts (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Unpaid Principal Balance (1)
 
Delinquency
Trigger
 
Delinquency Rate
 
Cumulative
Loss Trigger
 
Cumulative Loss Rate
 
 
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
June 30, 
 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Mid-State Trust IV
 
$
47,356

 
(2)  
 
 
 
10.00%
 
4.39%
 
4.38%
Mid-State Trust VI
 
69,418

 
8.00%
 
2.44%
 
3.15%
 
8.00%
 
5.41%
 
5.36%
Mid-State Trust VII
 
74,244

 
8.50%
 
2.69%
 
2.98%
 
1.50%
 
0.72%
 
1.43%
Mid-State Trust VIII
 
81,297

 
8.50%
 
3.00%
 
3.66%
 
1.50%
 
0.46%
 
1.37%
Mid-State Trust X
 
140,878

 
8.00%
 
3.46%
 
3.70%
 
8.00%
 
7.42%
 
7.60%
Mid-State Trust XI
 
124,168

 
8.75%
 
3.46%
 
3.55%
 
8.75%
 
6.75%
 
6.52%
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2004-1 Trust
 
111,043

 
8.00%
 
4.18%
 
4.67%
 
8.00%
 
3.81%
 
3.67%
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust
 
125,712

 
8.00%
 
6.31%
 
6.66%
 
7.00%
 
4.75%
 
4.46%
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust
 
138,947

 
8.00%
 
7.79%
 
8.85%
 
7.00%
 
8.45%
 
8.02%
Mid-State Capital Trust 2010-1
 
169,659

 
10.50%
 
8.32%
 
8.69%
 
5.50%
 
3.41%
 
2.78%
WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1
 
70,130

 
(2)  
 
 
 
(2)  
 
 
_________
(1)
Represents unpaid principal balance of the outstanding mortgage-backed debt.
(2)
Relevant trigger is not applicable per the underlying trust agreements.
Mortgage-Backed Debt
We funded the residential loan portfolio in the consolidated Residual Trusts through the securitization market. We record on our consolidated balance sheets the assets and liabilities, including mortgage-backed debt, of the Non-Residual Trusts as a result of certain obligations to exercise mandatory clean-up calls for each of these trusts at their earliest exercisable dates. The mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts is accounted for at amortized cost. The mortgage-backed debt of the Non-Residual Trusts is accounted for at fair value. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , the total unpaid principal balance of mortgage-backed debt was $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion , respectively.
At June 30, 2014 , mortgage-backed debt was collateralized by $2.3 billion of assets including residential loans, receivables related to the Non-Residual Trusts, real estate owned and restricted cash and cash equivalents. All of the mortgage-backed debt is non-recourse and not cross-collateralized and, therefore, must be satisfied exclusively with the proceeds from the residential loans and real estate owned held in each securitization trust and also from draws on the LOCs of certain Non-Residual Trusts.
Borrower remittances received on the residential loans of the Residual and Non-Residual Trusts collateralizing this debt and draws under LOCs issued by a third-party and serving as credit enhancements to certain of the Non-Residual Trusts are used to make payments on the mortgage-backed debt. The maturity of the mortgage-backed debt is directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on the collateral. As a result, the actual maturity of the mortgage-backed debt is likely to occur earlier than the stated maturity. Certain of our mortgage-backed debt issued by the Residual Trusts is also subject to voluntary redemption according to the specific terms of the respective indenture agreements, including an option by us to exercise a clean-up call. The mortgage-backed debt issued by the Non-Residual Trusts is subject to mandatory clean-up call provisions at the earliest of their exercisable call dates, which is the date each loan pool falls to 10% of the original principal amount. We anticipate the mandatory call obligations to settle beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019 based upon our current cash flow projections for the Non-Residual Trusts. The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the respective call dates is $417.9 million . We expect to finance the capital required to exercise the mandatory clean-up call primarily through asset-backed financing alone or in combination with additional issuances of equity and/or corporate indebtedness; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain

91



financing through the capital markets when needed. Our obligation for the mandatory clean-up call could have a significant impact on our liquidity.
Regulatory Compliance
We, including our subsidiaries, are required to maintain regulatory compliance with GSE and other agency and state program requirements, some of which are financial covenants related to minimum levels of net worth and other financial requirements. To the extent that these mandatory, imposed capital requirements are not met, the Company’s selling and servicing agreements could be terminated.
Due to the accounting treatment for reverse loans as secured borrowings when transferred, RMS has obtained an indefinite waiver for certain of these requirements from Ginnie Mae and a waiver through July 2015 from Fannie Mae. In addition, we have provided a guarantee whereby we guarantee the performance and obligations of RMS under the Ginnie Mae HMBS Program. In the event that we fail to honor this guarantee, Ginnie Mae could terminate RMS’ status as a qualified issuer of HMBS as well as take other actions permitted by law that could impact the operations of RMS, including the termination or suspension of RMS’ servicing rights associated with reverse loans guaranteed by Ginnie Mae HMBS. Ginnie Mae has continued to affirm RMS’ current commitment authority to issue HMBS.
We have also provided guarantees dated May 31, 2013 for RMS and March 17, 2014 for Green Tree Servicing.  Pursuant to the RMS guarantee, we agreed to guarantee all of the obligations required to be performed or paid by RMS under RMS's mortgage selling and servicing contract or any other agreement between Fannie Mae and RMS relating to mortgage loans or participation interests that RMS delivers or has delivered to Fannie Mae or services or has serviced for, or on behalf of, Fannie Mae. RMS does not currently sell loans to Fannie Mae. Pursuant to the Green Tree Servicing guarantee, we agreed to guarantee all of the servicing obligations required to be performed or paid by Green Tree Servicing under Green Tree Servicing's mortgage selling and servicing agreement, the Fannie Mae selling and servicing guides, or any other agreement between Fannie Mae and Green Tree Servicing. We also agreed to guarantee all selling representations and warranties Green Tree Servicing has assumed, or may in the future assume, in connection with Green Tree Servicing's purchase of mortgage servicing rights related to Fannie Mae loans. We do not guarantee Green Tree Servicing's obligations relating to the selling representations and warranties made or assumed by Green Tree Servicing in connection with the sale and/or securitization of mortgage loans to and/or by Fannie Mae.
Noncompliance with those requirements for which the Company has not received a waiver could have a negative impact on our company which could include suspension or termination of the selling and servicing agreements which would prohibit future origination or securitization of mortgage loans or being an approved seller or servicer for the applicable GSE.
Dividends
We have no current plans to pay any cash dividends on our common stock and instead may retain earnings, if any, for future operation and expansion or debt repayment, among other things. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants in our 2013 Credit Agreement and the Senior Notes Indenture. See “Corporate Debt” above.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table sets forth selected consolidated cash flow information for the periods indicated (in thousands):
 
 
For the Six Months 
 Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Variance
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income adjusted for non-cash operating activities
 
$
26,808

 
$
(149,144
)
 
$
175,952

Changes in assets and liabilities
 
(103,704
)
 
(399,466
)
 
295,762

Net cash provided by (used in) originations activities (1)
 
3,054

 
(1,505,870
)
 
1,508,924

Cash flows used in operating activities
 
(73,842
)
 
(2,054,480
)
 
1,980,638

Cash flows used in investing activities
 
(712,851
)
 
(2,682,985
)
 
1,970,134

Cash flows provided by financing activities
 
598,149

 
4,828,031

 
(4,229,882
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
$
(188,544
)
 
$
90,566

 
$
(279,110
)
_________
(1)
Represents purchases and originations of residential loans held for sale, net of proceeds from sale and payments.

92



Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities of $73.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 decreased $2.0 billion from $2.1 billion in 2013 . The primary uses of cash for operating activities in 2014 were purchases, originations and sales activity of residential loans held for sale, changes in assets and liabilities, or operating working capital, and net income adjusted for non-cash items. Net cash of $3.1 million was provided by purchases, originations and sales activity of residential loans held for sale related to the forward loans originations business. We used $103.7 million in operating working capital largely as a result of an increase in servicer and protective advances during the first six months of 2014 .
Net cash used in operating activities was $2.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013 . The primary uses of cash from operating activities were purchases, originations and sales activity of residential loans held for sale and net income adjusted for non-cash items. The net cash used in operating activities in 2013 was primarily due to the ramp up of our originations activities which resulted in $5.3 billion used in originations and acquisitions of residential loans offset by $3.8 billion in proceeds from sales of residential loans.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $712.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 decreased $2.0 billion from $2.7 billion in 2013 . Our Reverse Mortgage segment purchases, originates, and securitizes reverse mortgage loans. We fund these activities through master repurchase agreements, which are presented as financing activities as required by GAAP. The securitizations of reverse mortgages are legally structured as sales, but for accounting purposes are treated as financings under the applicable accounting guidance. As a result, the HMBS related obligation is also presented as a financing activity as required by GAAP. Cash used for purchases and originations of reverse loans held for investment, net of payments received decreased during the first six months of 2014 compared to 2013 by $1.2 billion as a result of a decrease in new origination volume in our reverse mortgage operations. Cash paid for business acquisitions and purchases of servicing rights also decreased $746.2 million during the first six months of 2014 compared to 2013 .
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013 . For the six months ended June 30, 2013 , the primary uses of cash were $1.9 billion for purchases and originations of reverse residential loans held for investment, $478.1 million in payments for the acquisitions of the ResCap net assets and the Ally Bank net assets as well as acquisitions of servicing rights of $537.3 million , which includes the BOA asset purchase. During the same period, the primary sources of cash provided by investing activities were the principal payments received from borrowers on our residential loans held for investment of $225.7 million and net cash proceeds from sales of real estate owned of $13.8 million .
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities of $598.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 decreased $4.2 billion from $4.8 billion in 2013 . The primary sources of cash in 2014 related to securing cash for our originations, reverse mortgage and servicing businesses. Cash generated from the securitization of reverse loans, net of payments on HMBS related obligations decreased $1.3 billion as a result of a decrease in new origination volume in our reverse mortgage operations. Net cash borrowings from servicing advance liabilities used to fund advances for our servicing business decreased $568.3 million primarily as a result of the lack of funding of advances associated with bulk servicing right acquisitions in the first six months of 2014 compared to 2013 . Net cash borrowings on master repurchase agreements decreased $1.4 billion due to a decline in origination volumes in both our forward mortgage originations business and reverse mortgage originations business. As discussed above, the originations of forward and reverse loans are included in operating and investing activities, respectively. Net cash generated from corporate debt financing activities decreased $982.5 million as a result of additional incremental borrowings under our 2012 Term Loan during the first six months of 2013 with no comparable borrowings during the first six months of 2014 .
Net cash provided by financing activities was $4.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013 . For the six months ended June 30, 2013 , the primary sources of cash were $1.0 billion in proceeds from issuance of corporate debt, net of debt issuance costs, $2.0 billion in proceeds from securitizations of reverse loans, $637.5 million in issuances of servicing advance liabilities, net of related payments, and $1.5 billion in net borrowings of master repurchase agreements. During the same period, the primary uses of cash for financing activities were the payments on HMBS related obligations of $155.3 million and $100.0 million in payments on mortgage-backed debt.
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk that we will not fully collect the principal we have invested due to borrower defaults. We manage the credit risk associated with our residential loan portfolio through monitoring of existing loans, early identification of problem loans, and timely resolution of problems.

93



Residential Loans Held For Investment
We are subject to credit risk associated with the residual interests that we own in the consolidated Residual Trusts as well as with the unencumbered forward loans held in our portfolio, both of which are recognized as residential loans at amortized cost, net on our consolidated balance sheets. We do not currently own residual interests in the Non-Residual Trusts and we consider our credit risk with regard to these trusts to be insignificant. However, we have assumed mandatory call obligations related to the Non-Residual Trusts and will be subject to a certain amount of credit risk associated with the purchased residential loans when the calls are exercised, which is when each loan pool falls to 10% of the original principal amount. We anticipate the mandatory call obligations to settle beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019 based upon our current cash flow projections for the Non-Residual Trusts. The total outstanding balance of the residential loans expected to be called at the respective call dates is $417.9 million .
Our reverse loans are insured by the FHA. Although performing and nonperforming loans are covered by FHA insurance, we may incur expenses and losses in the process of repurchasing and liquidating these loans that are not reimbursable by FHA in accordance with program guidelines. However we consider these amounts to be insignificant. Refer to additional information on reverse loan securitizations in the Liquidity and Capital Resources – Reverse Mortgage Origination Business section above and foreclosures of reverse loans at the Real Estate Market Risk section below. As a result of minimal or no severity, credit risk associated with the Non-Residual Trusts and reverse loans is not discussed further in this section.
At June 30, 2014 , the carrying value of our held for investment residential loan portfolio that exposes us to credit risk was $1.4 billion . These loans are held primarily by our Loans and Residuals segment. The carrying value of residential loans and other collateral of the Residual Trusts total $1.4 billion and is permanently financed with $1.2 billion of mortgage-backed debt. Our credit exposure of $270.8 million associated with the Residual Trusts, which is calculated as the difference between the assets and liabilities of these VIEs, approximates our residual interests in these trusts.
The residential loans that expose us to credit risk are predominantly credit-challenged, non-conforming loans. These loans had an unpaid principal balance of $ 1.5 billion at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 . In addition, 3.90% and 4.07% of these loans were 90 days or more past due at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively. While we feel that our underwriting and servicing with regard to these loans will help to mitigate the risk of significant borrower default on these loans, we cannot assure you that all borrowers will continue to satisfy their payment obligations under these loans, thereby avoiding default.
Residential Loans Held For Sale
We are subject to credit risk associated with forward loans that we purchase and originate during the period of time prior to the sale of these loans. We consider our credit risk associated with these loans to be insignificant as we hold the loans for a short period of time, typically less than 20 days, and the market for these loans continues to be highly liquid.
We sell our loans on a nonrecourse basis. We also provide representations and warranties to purchasers and insurers of the loans sold that typically are in place for the life of the loan. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, we may be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or indemnify the purchaser, and any subsequent loss on the mortgage loan may be borne by us. If there is no breach of a representation and warranty provision, we have no obligation to repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor against loss. The outstanding unpaid principal balance of loans sold by us represents the maximum potential exposure related to representation and warranty provisions. Refer to additional information regarding sales of forward loans in Note 5 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We maintain a reserve for losses on loans repurchased or indemnified as a result of breaches of representations and warranties on our sold loans. Our reserve is based on assumptions related to defect rates, repurchase rates and ultimate credit losses on potential repurchases. These assumptions are based on market information where available and historical experience with similar loan portfolios. Our assumptions are affected by factors both internal and external in nature. Internal factors include, among other things, level of loan sales, as well as to whom the loans are sold, the expectation of credit loss on repurchases and indemnifications, our success rate at appealing repurchase demands and our ability to recover any losses from third parties. External factors that may affect our estimate include, among other things, the overall economic condition in the housing market, secondary market conditions, home prices, the economic condition of borrowers, the political environment at investor agencies and the overall U.S. and world economy. Many of the factors are beyond our control and may lead to judgments that are susceptible to change.
Real Estate Market Risk
We include on our consolidated balance sheets assets secured by real property and property obtained directly as a result of foreclosures. Residential property values are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; and retroactive changes to building or similar codes. In addition, decreases

94



in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses.
The Company held real estate owned, net of $43.8 million , $34.2 million and $1.1 million in the Reverse Mortgage and Loans and Residuals segments, and Other non-reportable segment, respectively, at June 30, 2014 . The Company held real estate owned, net of $27.0 million , $45.3 million and $1.3 million in the Reverse Mortgage and Loans and Residuals segments, and Other non-reportable segment, respectively, at December 31, 2013 .
A nonperforming reverse loan whose maximum claim amount has not been met is generally foreclosed upon on behalf of Ginnie Mae with the real estate owned remaining in the securitization pool until liquidation. Although performing and nonperforming loans are covered by FHA insurance, we may incur expenses and losses in the process of repurchasing and liquidating these loans that are not reimbursable by FHA in accordance with program guidelines. However, we consider these amounts to be insignificant. The growth in the real estate owned portfolio held by the Reverse Mortgage segment was due to growth in our business and the typical flow of HECMs that move through the foreclosure process.
Counterparty Credit Risk
We are exposed to counterparty credit risk from the inability of counterparties to our forward loan and mortgage backed security purchase and loan sale agreements to meet the terms of those agreements. We minimize this risk through monitoring procedures and collateral requirements. Counterparty credit risk is taken into account when determining fair value, although its impact is diminished by daily margin posting on all forward sales and purchase derivatives.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have interests in VIEs that we do not consolidate as we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. In addition, we have interests in forward loans that have been sold with servicing retained. Refer to Note 4 and Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Other than the arrangements described in the footnotes referenced above, we do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose or VIEs, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not have any undisclosed borrowings or debt, and have not entered into any synthetic leases. We are, therefore, not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships other than those described above.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The critical accounting estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described in the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014 . There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies or estimates and the methodologies or assumptions we apply under them.

95



Glossary of Terms
This Glossary of Terms includes acronyms and defined terms that are used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
2012 Revolver
$125 million senior secured revolving credit facility entered into on November 28, 2012
2012 Term Loan
$700 million senior term loan facility entered into on November 28, 2012
2013 Revolver
$125 million senior secured revolving credit facility entered into on December 19, 2013
2013 Term Loan
$1.5 billion senior secured first lien term loan entered into on December 19, 2013
2013 Secured Credit Facilities
2013 Term Loan and 2013 Revolver, collectively
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, a non-GAAP measure
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss)
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings or Loss, a Non-GAAP measure
Advisers Act
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended
ARM
Asset Receivables Management
ASIC
American Security Insurance Company
BOA
Bank of America, N.A.
Borrowers
Borrowers under residential mortgage loans and installment obligors under residential retail installment agreements
CFE
Collateralized financing entity
CFPB
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Charged-off loans
Also referred to as "post charge-off deficiency balances"
CID
Civil investigative demand
Convertible Notes
$290 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible senior subordinated notes sold in a registered underwritten public offering on October 23, 2012
Ditech
Ditech Mortgage Corp, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
Dodd-Frank Act
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Early Advance Reimbursement
Formerly referred to as Servicing Advance Reimbursement Agreement
EITF
Emerging Issues Task Force
EverBank
EverBank Financial Corp
Fannie Mae
Federal National Mortgage Association
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FHA
Federal Housing Administration
FHFA
Federal Housing Finance Agency
FinCEN
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
Forward loans/mortgages
Forward mortgage loans and residential retail installment agreements
Freddie Mac
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FTC
Federal Trade Commission
GAAP
United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Ginnie Mae
Government National Mortgage Association
Green Tree
GTCS Holdings LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
Green Tree Servicing
Green Tree Servicing LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
GSE
Government-sponsored entity
GTIM
Green Tree Investment Management LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
HAMP
Home Affordable Modification Program
HARP
Home Affordable Refinance Program
HECM
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage
HMBS
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage-Backed Securities
HUD
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
IRLC
Interest rate lock commitment

96



IRS
Internal Revenue Service
Lender-placed
Also referred to as "force-placed"
LIBOR
London Interbank Offered Rate
LOC
Letter of Credit
Marix
Marix Servicing, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
MBA
Mortgage Bankers Association
MBS
Mortgage-backed securities
MetLife Bank
MetLife Bank, N.A.
Monitor
Monitor under the National Mortgage Settlement
MSR
Mortgage servicing rights
Non-Residual Trusts
Securitization trusts that the Company consolidates and in which the Company does not hold residual interests
NY DFS
New York State Department of Financial Services
NYSE
New York Stock Exchange
OTS
Office of Thrift Supervision
Receivables Loan Agreement
$75 million facility entered into on May 2, 2012
REIT
Real estate investment trust
ResCap
Residential Capital LLC
Residential loans
Residential mortgage loans, including forward mortgage loans, reverse mortgage loans and residential retail installment agreements, which include manufactured housing loans
Residual Trusts
Securitization trusts that the Company consolidates and in which it holds a residual interest
Reverse loans/mortgages
Reverse mortgage loans, including HECMs
RMS
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
RMSA
Reverse Mortgage Stabilization Act of 2013
RSU
Restricted stock units
S1L
Security One Lending, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, now known as Ditech
SEC
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Senior Notes
$575 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes issued on December 17, 2013
Servicer and Protective Advance
Financing Facilities
The Company's interests in financing entities that acquire servicer and protective advances from certain wholly-owned subsidiaries
Trust 2005-1
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust
Trust 2006-1
Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust
Trust VII
Mid-State Trust VII
Trust Notes
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed notes issued by the Residual Trusts, which consist of both public debt offerings and private offerings
TBAs
To-be-announced securities
TSR
Total shareholder return
UPB
Unpaid principal balance
U.S.
United States of America
VIE
Variable interest entity
Walter Energy
Walter Energy, Inc.
WCO
Walter Capital Opportunity Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries
WCO Target Assets
Assets in which WCO can invest, including excess servicing spread related to MSRs, forward MSRs, forward and reverse residential whole loans, reverse MSRs (to the extent available and consistent with the real estate investment trust rules), agency reverse mortgage backed securities and other real estate related securities and related derivatives
York
York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC

97



ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We seek to manage the risks inherent in our business — including but not limited to credit risk, liquidity risk, real estate market risk, and interest rate risk — in a prudent manner designed to enhance our earnings and preserve our capital. In general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from historical experience, to actively manage such risks, and to maintain capital levels consistent with these risks. For information regarding our credit risk, real estate market risk and liquidity risk refer to the Credit Risk Management, Real Estate Market Risk and Liquidity and Capital Resources sections above in Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk of changing interest rates in the market place. Our primary interest rate risk exposure relates to servicing rights carried at fair value, loans held for sale and related derivatives, and other variable rate assets and liabilities.
Servicing Rights, Loans Held for Sale and Related Freestanding Derivatives
Sensitivity Analysis
The following table summarizes the estimated change in the fair value of our servicing rights carried at fair value and residential loans held for sale and related derivatives given hypothetical instantaneous parallel shifts in the interest rate yield curve (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
Down 50 bps
 
Down 25 bps
 
Up 25 bps
 
Up 50 bps
Increase (decrease) in assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential loans held for sale
$
26,238

 
$
14,396

 
$
(15,953
)
 
$
(33,481
)
Servicing rights carried at fair value
(184,143
)
 
(90,277
)
 
88,362

 
173,522

Other assets (freestanding derivatives) (1)
41,124

 
24,533

 
(30,046
)
 
(64,295
)
Total change in assets
(116,781
)
 
(51,348
)
 
42,363

 
75,746

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accrued liabilities (freestanding derivatives) (1)
72,321

 
39,974

 
(44,593
)
 
(93,945
)
Total change in liabilities
72,321

 
39,974

 
(44,593
)
 
(93,945
)
Net change
$
(189,102
)
 
$
(91,322
)
 
$
86,956

 
$
169,691

_______
(1) Consists of IRLCs, forward sales commitments and MBS purchase commitments.
We used June 30, 2014 market rates on our instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis. These sensitivities are hypothetical and presented for illustrative purposes only. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in fair value may not be linear.
Servicing Rights
Servicing rights are subject to prepayment risk as the mortgage loans underlying the servicing rights permit the borrowers to prepay the loans. Consequently, the value of these servicing rights generally tend to diminish in periods of declining interest rates (as prepayments increase) and tend to increase in periods of rising interest rates (as prepayments decrease). Although the level of interest rates is a key driver of prepayment activity, there are other factors that influence prepayments, including home prices, underwriting standards and product characteristics.
Loans Held for Sale and Related Freestanding Derivatives
We are subject to interest rate and price risk on forward loans held for sale during the short time from the loan funding date until the date the loan is sold into the secondary market. Interest rate lock commitments represent an agreement to extend credit to a mortgage loan applicant or to purchase loans from a third-party originator, collectively referred to as IRLC, whereby the interest rate of the loan is set prior to funding or purchase. Outstanding IRLCs are subject to interest rate risk and related price risk during the period from the date of the commitment through the loan funding date or expiration date. Loan commitments generally range from 35 to 50 days from lock to funding, and our holding period of the mortgage loan from funding to sale is typically less than 20 days.

98



An integral component of our interest rate risk management strategy is our use of freestanding derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in interest rates that affect the value of our IRLCs and forward loans held for sale. The derivatives utilized to hedge the interest rate risk are forward sales commitments, which are forward sales of agency TBAs. These TBAs are primarily used to fix the forward sales price that will be realized upon the sale of the mortgage loans into the secondary market.
Other Variable Rate Assets and Liabilities
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about interest rate risk on other variable rate assets and liabilities, refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014 . These risks have not changed materially since December 31, 2013 .
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2014 . Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2014 , the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

99



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We and our current and former officers and employees are involved in litigation, investigations and claims arising out of the normal conduct of our business. We estimate and accrue liabilities resulting from such matters based on a variety of factors, including outstanding legal claims, proposed settlements and assessments of pending or threatened litigation. These accruals are recorded when the costs are determined to be probable and are reasonably estimable. Facts and circumstances may change that could cause the actual liabilities to exceed the accrued amounts or that may require adjustments to the recorded liability balances in the future. The following is a description of certain litigation and regulatory matters:
In response to a CID from the FTC issued in November 2010 and a CID from the CFPB in September 2012, Green Tree Servicing has produced documents and other information concerning a wide range of its loan servicing operations. On October 7, 2013, the CFPB notified Green Tree Servicing that the CFPB’s staff was considering recommending that the CFPB take action against Green Tree Servicing for alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. On February 20, 2014, the FTC and CFPB staff advised Green Tree Servicing that they had sought authority to bring an enforcement action and negotiate a resolution related to alleged violations of various federal consumer financial laws. Our understanding is that the CFPB staff now has authority to commence an action against Green Tree Servicing and that the FTC staff has authority to negotiate and would need further FTC approval to file such an action. In April 2014, Green Tree Servicing began discussions with the FTC and CFPB staffs to determine if a settlement of the proposed action can be achieved. Those discussions are ongoing. The FTC and CFPB staffs have indicated that as part of a settlement, they will seek injunctive relief in relation to Green Tree Servicing’s business practices, civil money penalties and equitable monetary relief of an undetermined amount. We are unable to predict whether a settlement of the proposed action can be achieved on terms acceptable to us, the FTC and the CFPB, and cannot predict the final terms of any such settlement. We cannot provide any assurance that the FTC and/or CFPB will not take legal action against us or that the allegations made by the FTC and/or CFPB or the commencement, settlement or other outcome of any such action will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, business practices, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
On October 2, 2013, we received a subpoena from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General requesting documents and other information concerning (i) the curtailment of interest payments on HECMs serviced or sub-serviced by RMS, and (ii) RMS’ contractual arrangements with a third-party vendor for the management and disposition of real estate owned properties. We have produced certain materials to HUD in response to the subpoena. In May 2014, the Department of Justice informed us that it is working with HUD in investigating possible violations by RMS of federal law, including the False Claims Act. We are cooperating with this investigation and have been in contact with representatives of the Department of Justice and HUD. Resolutions of investigations or lawsuits, or findings of liability, under the False Claims Act may result in potentially significant financial consequences, including the payment of up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government and civil penalties. We cannot provide any assurance as to the outcome of the investigations by the Department of Justice and HUD or that any consequences will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
On March 7, 2014, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Mark O’Brien, Charles Cauthen, Denmar Dixon, Marc Helm and Robert Yeary captioned Beck v. Walter Investment Management Corp., et al., No. 1:14-cv-20880 (S.D. Fla.). On July 7, 2014, an amended class action complaint was filed. The amended complaint names as defendants the Company, Mark O’Brien, Charles Cauthen, Denmar Dixon, Keith Anderson, Brian Corey and Mark Helm, and is captioned Thorpe, et al. v. Walter Investment Management Corp., et al. No. 1:14-cv-20880-UU. The amended complaint asserts federal securities law claims against the Company and the individual defendants under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Additional claims are asserted against the individual defendants under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The amended complaint alleges that between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014 the Company and the individual defendants made material misstatements or omissions relating to the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting, the processes and procedures for compliance with applicable regulatory and legal requirements by Green Tree Servicing (including certain of the Company’s business practices that are being reviewed by the FTC and the CFPB), the liabilities associated with the Company’s acquisition of RMS, and RMS's internal controls. The complaint seeks class certification and an unspecified amount of damages on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s securities between May 9, 2012 and February 26, 2014. We cannot provide any assurance as to the disposition of the complaint or that such disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
As various federal and state regulators continue to investigate perceived causes and consequences of the financial crisis, we expect that we may receive general information requests from other agencies. During the second quarter of 2014, we met with a working group representing the attorneys general and regulators of several states as well as representatives of the

100



Office of the United States Trustee to discuss the business practices of Green Tree. At the meeting, we were informed of concerns about various loan servicing practices, including certain bankruptcy-related matters. We understand that members of this group have initiated an investigation of Green Tree’s loan servicing practices and we expect to receive a CID in the near future. We cannot predict the timing, direction or outcome of any such investigations.
As discussed in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report, Walter Energy is in disputes with the IRS on a number of federal income tax issues. Walter Energy has stated in its public filings that it believes that all of its current and prior tax filing positions have substantial merit and that Walter Energy intends to defend vigorously any tax claims asserted. Under the terms of the tax separation agreement between us and Walter Energy dated April 17, 2009, Walter Energy is responsible for the payment of all federal income taxes (including any interest or penalties applicable thereto) of the consolidated group, which includes the aforementioned claims of the IRS. However, to the extent that Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, we could be responsible for any unpaid amounts.
We are, and expect that we will continue to be, involved in litigation, arbitration, investigations, and claims in the ordinary course of business, including purported class actions and other legal proceedings challenging whether certain of our loan servicing practices and other aspects of our business comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements. These legal proceedings include, among other things, putative class action claims concerning "force-placed insurance," the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and other federal and state laws and statutes. The outcome of these legal proceedings is uncertain, and it is possible that adverse results in such proceedings (which could include penalties, punitive damages and injunctive relief affecting our business practices) and the terms of any settlements of such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, cooperating in, defending and resolving these legal proceedings may consume significant amounts of management time and attention and could cause us to incur substantial legal, consulting and other expenses and to change our business practices, even in cases where there is no determination that our conduct failed to meet applicable legal or regulatory requirements.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in, or incorporated by reference in, this report, you should carefully review and consider the risks and uncertainties described below and in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which are the risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, cash flows, liquidity, results of operations, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders and/or our stock price. In addition, to the extent that any of the information contained in this report or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 constitutes forward-looking information, the risk factors set forth below and in such Annual Report are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results for various financial reporting periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf.
We are required to service some of our mortgage loans in accordance with the National Mortgage Settlement standards, and our failure to meet those standards has harmed, and may continue to harm, our reputation and business.
In connection with our purchase of Fannie Mae MSRs from ResCap on January 31, 2013, we agreed to service the mortgage loans for which the MSRs were acquired in accordance with the servicing standards set forth in a Consent Judgment, the National Mortgage Settlement, filed on April 4, 2012 in a legal proceeding involving ResCap as a party. During initial testing of our adherence to these servicing standards in the calendar quarter ended December 31, 2013, we determined that we had exceeded threshold error rates for certain servicing metrics. We have reported our findings to the Monitor, who was appointed under the Consent Judgment and charged with responsibility to determine whether the servicers subject to the NMS are complying with the standards and satisfying the requirements of the Consent Judgment. On May 14, 2014, the Monitor filed a report with the Consent Judgment court, stating that we had potential violations in respect of 8 of the 28 metrics tested (including two relating to bankruptcy filings, two relating to pre-foreclosure matters, and one relating to each of the following: waived fees; vendor management; complaints; and loan modifications). We have since submitted to the Monitor corrective action plans designed to address and cure the root causes of the failed metrics and to prevent future recurrences. These plans have been approved by the Monitor and retesting of the 8 metrics will take place in the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2014. In approving the corrective action plans, the Monitor reached the preliminary conclusion that 3 of our potential violations were widespread, and in accordance with the NMS procedures we have submitted for the Monitor’s review remediation plans for all borrowers affected by the potential violations. We believe this incident has caused us reputational damage and may have adversely affected our business development activities. We cannot predict whether or to what extent our business will be adversely affected by these events, if at all. Further, although we are devoting considerable resources to ensuring that in subsequent testing periods we will be found to have met the NMS requirements, there is no assurance that our corrective action plans will be successful and that we will meet all other NMS requirements. In addition, if in the future we again fail any of the 8 servicing metrics failed in the Monitor's May 14, 2014 report, we may be obligated to indemnify ResCap in the event ResCap is fined or penalized as a result of our conduct.

101



If we fail to operate our business in compliance with both existing and future requirements, our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our business is subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governmental authorities, including the CFPB, the FTC, HUD, the SEC and various state agencies that license, audit and conduct examinations of our mortgage servicing, origination, insurance and collection activities. The GSEs, Ginnie Mae, our business partners and others also subject us to periodic reviews and audits, and we routinely conduct our own internal reviews and audits. These various audits, reviews and examinations of our business and related activities sometimes uncover deficiencies in our compliance with our policies and other requirements to which we are subject. While it is our policy to investigate and remediate any such deficiencies, there can be no assurance that any remedial measures we implement will ensure compliance with applicable policies, laws and regulations or be deemed sufficient by the GSEs, governmental authorities or other interested parties.
In addition, we currently devote substantial resources (including senior management time and attention) to regulatory compliance and regulatory inquiries, and we incur, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs in connection therewith. Our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by the substantial resources (including senior management time and attention) we devote to, and the significant compliance costs we incur in connection with, compliance and regulatory inquiries, and any fines, penalties or similar payments we make in connection with resolving such matters.
Furthermore, our failure to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations or to implement and adhere to adequate remedial measures designed to address any identified compliance deficiencies could lead to:
the loss of licenses and approvals necessary to operate our business;
damage to our reputation in the industry;
governmental investigations and enforcement actions;
administrative fines and penalties and litigation;
civil and criminal liability, including class action lawsuits;
a significant increase in compliance costs;
a significant increase in the resources (including senior management time and attention) we devote to regulatory compliance and regulatory inquiries;
an inability to access new, or a loss of current, liquidity and funding sources necessary to operate our business; and
an inability to execute on our business strategy.
Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our reputation, business and operations could be adversely affected if there are regulatory compliance failures related to our investment adviser activities.
One of our subsidiaries, GTIM, is a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act. GTIM provides investment advisory and related services to investment advisory clients. A failure by GTIM to comply with the requirements of the Advisers Act, including record-keeping, advertising and operating requirements, disclosure obligations and prohibitions on fraudulent activities, could result in investigations, sanctions and reputational damage.

We will have to manage the conflicts of interests inherent in the investment allocation commitments we have made to WCO and our own investment objectives. Our failure to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest could damage our reputation, expose us to regulatory risks, and adversely affect our business.

WCO’s investment objectives include the acquisition of WCO Target Assets, which include servicing-related assets of the type that we have historically acquired (or retained) and that we may be interested in acquiring (or retaining) in the future. We have agreed to provide WCO with certain rights of first offer in certain investment opportunities in WCO Target Assets, which could limit our ability to acquire (or retain) such assets ourselves. We have adopted an allocation policy pursuant to which WCO will have certain rights of first offer to invest in certain percentages of WCO Target Assets identified by us or our affiliates while WCO’s management agreement with GTIM is in effect. In addition, we have specific contractual commitments with WCO relating to certain WCO Target Assets we may originate or otherwise create in the future. In order to comply with the allocation policy and these contractual commitments to WCO, we have adopted internal compliance policies and procedures.

102




Mr. O’Brien, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also serves as WCO’s Nonexecutive Chairman, and Mr. Dixon, our Vice Chairman and Chief Investment Officer also serves as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and a member of the board of directors of WCO. Messrs O'Brien and Dixon may have conflicts between their duties to us and our subsidiaries and their duties to WCO. Messrs. Dixon and O’Brien also own shares of us but not WCO, which could create the perception of additional conflicts of interest regarding investment decisions for WCO and us. We have attempted to address these potential conflicts through our internal compliance policies and procedures, our allocation policy and the agreements we negotiated with WCO, although no assurance can be given that conflicts will not nevertheless arise.

Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential or actual conflicts of interest. It is possible that potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to disagreements with WCO or regulatory enforcement actions as a result of GTIM’s obligations as the investment advisor to WCO. Conflicts of interest may also exist or develop regarding various matters, including decisions about the allocation of specific investment opportunities between us on the one hand and WCO on the other, in situations involving sales of assets by us to WCO, and in situations where we may seek to service mortgage assets held by WCO. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, hamper our ability to raise additional funds, discourage counterparties to do business with us, and damage our investment in WCO. Any such development could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The owners of loans we service or sub-service may, under certain circumstances, transfer our servicing rights or sub-servicing or otherwise terminate our MSR or sub-servicing contracts.
Under the terms of our master servicing agreements (including any amendments and addendums thereto) with GSEs and other customers, our customers have the right to terminate us as the servicer of the loans we service on their behalf if we default pursuant to the terms and conditions of the applicable servicing agreement. In addition, under certain of our agreements the servicing on some or all of the loans can be transferred by our customer, either with or without cause, and in certain of these  instances without us receiving consideration for the transferred servicing rights.
Under our sub-servicing contracts (including any amendments and addendums thereto), the primary servicers for whom we conduct sub-servicing activities have the right to terminate our sub-servicing rights with or without cause, with generally 60 to 90 days’ notice to us. In some instances, the sub-servicing contracts require payment to us of a deboarding fee upon transfer, while in other instances there is little to no consideration paid to us in connection with any transfer or other termination of sub-servicing rights. We expect to continue to seek additional sub-servicing opportunities under terms and conditions which could exacerbate these risks.
If we were to have our servicing or sub-servicing rights transferred or otherwise terminated on a material portion of our servicing portfolio, this could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
a)
Not applicable.
b)
Not applicable.
c)
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
On August 8, 2014, we announced that Keith A. Anderson, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, will be separating from the Company on mutually agreed terms. Pursuant to a separation agreement, described in more detail below, Mr. Anderson is expected to remain in his current position with us until the date that is ninety days from the date of the agreement or an earlier date determined by us in our discretion (the “Termination Date”).

103



In accordance with the terms of the separation agreement, Mr. Anderson has agreed to enter into a consultancy agreement with us for the one-year period after the Termination Date, pursuant to which he will provide requested services to the Company pertaining to the management and operations of our mortgage servicing and origination businesses for a consulting fee of $35,833 per month. The separation agreement provides for the following compensation and benefits, subject to Mr. Anderson’s execution of a general release of claims:
an amount, to be pro-rated to the Termination Date, which will be, before pro-ration, equal to no less than the lesser of (i) a fraction of $860,000 which is relative to the 2014 MIP bonuses awarded to certain other executive officers of the Company and (ii) $860,000;
a series of lump sum payments to be made in 2015 and 2016 totaling $800,000 in the aggregate;
a legacy payment of $50,093.96;
the consultancy agreement; and
continued vesting with respect to certain equity awards held by Mr. Anderson, as set forth below (the remainder of Mr. Anderson’s equity awards, including 43,859 stock options granted on April 3, 2013 and 49,835 performance shares granted on March 24, 2014, will be forfeited by Mr. Anderson):
Award Date
No. Shares
Award/Option Price
Vest Date
2/28/12
15,857
$20.57
2/28/15
11/1/11
20,000
RSU
11/1/15
3/24/14
8,305
RSU
3/24/16
3/24/14
8,306
RSU
3/24/17

Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Anderson will be bound by customary restrictive covenants, including an agreement not to compete with us during, and for a period of twelve months after, the termination of the consultancy agreement.

The foregoing description of the separation agreement is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the separation agreement, which is incorporated by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 10.4.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index, which appears immediately following the signature page below, are included or incorporated by reference herein.

104



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP.
 
 
 
 
 
Dated: August 11, 2014
 
By:
 
/s/ Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
 
Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Authorized Signatory)
 
 
 
 
 
Dated: August 11, 2014
 
By:
 
/s/ Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
 
Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 

105



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
 
Note
 
Description
 
 
 
 
 
10.1*
 
(1)
 
Addendum, effective June 6, 2014, to Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract, dated March 23, 2005, by and between Fannie Mae and Green Tree Servicing LLC.
 
 
 
 
 
10.2
 
(1)
 
First Amendment, effective June 1, 2014, to Addendum, effective as of April 1, 2014, to Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract, dated March 23, 2005, by and between Fannie Mae and GreenTree Servicing LLC.
 
 
 
 
 
10.3
 
(1)
 
Amendment No. 6 to Amended and Restated Receivables Loan Agreement, dated May 2, 2012, among Green Tree Advance Receivables II LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Green Tree Servicing LLC, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, and various other parties.
 
 
 
 
 
10.4
 
(1)
 
Separation Agreement, dated August 8, 2014, by and between Walter Investment Management Corp. and Keith A. Anderson.
 
 
 
 
 
31.1
 
(1)
 
Certification by Mark J. O’Brien pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
31.2
 
(1)
 
Certification by Gary L. Tillett pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
32
 
(1)
 
Certification by Mark J. O’Brien and Gary L. Tillett pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1352, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
99
 
(1)
 
Walter Investment Management Corp. Press Release dated August 8, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
101
 
(1)
 
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) — The following materials from Walter Investment Management Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
*
Certain information has been omitted from this exhibit and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Note
 
Notes to Exhibit Index
 
 
 
(1)
 
Filed herewith.


106


EXHIBIT 10.1
Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as [***]. A complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ADDENDUM TO
MORTGAGE SELLING AND SERVICING CONTRACT

This Addendum modifies that Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated March 23,
2005 (the "MSSC") by and between Fannie Mae ("Fannie Mae"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States, and Green Tree Servicing LLC ("Servicer"), a Delaware limited liability company. This Addendum is effective on the date executed by Fannie Mae.
In consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and conditions contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
I. [***] - Subsequent Transfers . If at any time after the effective date of this Addendum, (i) a borrower under any mortgage loan serviced by Servicer is delinquent with respect to payment for [***] and (ii) Servicer (or any subservicer of the applicable mortgage loan) at the time of such determination has failed to sustain performance [***], Fannie Mae reserves the right to acquire from Servicer, [***], the servicing rights to the applicable mortgage loan, including the right to transfer such servicing rights to a provider of its choice at any time. If Servicer, at any time thereafter, sustains performance [***], Fannie Mae's right to acquire the servicing rights to mortgage loans pursuant to this Addendum shall expire, provided that the terms of this Addendum shall remain in full force and effect.
II. Entire Agreement . All other terms, conditions, provisions, and covenants in the MSSC, as amended, shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.
III. Counterparts . This Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute a single agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties to this Addendum has caused this Addendum to be duly executed in its name by one of its duly authorized officers.
Fannie Mae                          Green Tree Servicing LLC
(Servicer)
By:      /s/ Tara Malone _________________      By:      /s/ Thomas J. Franco ____________
Name:      Tara Malone ____________________      Name:      Thomas J. Franco ______________
Title:      Vice President __________________      Title:      President _____________________
Date:      6/6/14 _________________________      Date:      6/6/14 _______________________


*** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

EXHIBIT 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO MORTGAGE SELLING AND SERVICING
CONTRACT (EAR Agreement)

This First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to that Addendum To Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated effective as of April 1, 2014 (the “EAR Agreement”) by and between FANNIE MAE, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States (“Fannie Mae”) and Green Tree Servicing LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (“Servicer”), is hereby mutually agreed upon and entered into effective June 1, 2014.

WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS , Fannie Mae and Servicer desire to include as Eligible Advances under the EAR
Agreement certain advances applicable to those mortgage serving rights relating to Fannie Mae loans acquired by Servicer from EverBank pursuant to that certain Mortgage Servicing
Purchase and Sale Agreement between dated and effective as of October 30, 2013 and with a transfer date of May 1, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and conditions and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and upon terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, the
Fannie Mae and Servicer agree as follows:

Section 1.      Defined Terms . Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms which are defined in the EAR Agreement, as amended hereby, are used herein as therein defined.

Section 2.      Schedule 1 . Schedule 1 to the EAR Agreement shall be amended and replaced with the attached revised Schedule 1.

Section 3.      Schedule 2 . Schedule 2 to the EAR Agreement shall be shall be amended and replaced with the attached revised Schedule 2. The total early reimbursement of
Legacy Servicing Advances applicable to the EverBank portfolio (Seller Servicer ID’s referenced in Schedule 1 and 2) shall not exceed Sixty million ($60,000,000) dollars and
Servicer may request early reimbursement of such Legacy Servicing Advances through August 1, 2014.

Section 4.      Continuing Effect of the EAR Agreement . Except as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the EAR Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 5.      Counterparts . This First Amendment to EAR Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

[Signatures Follow]




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties has caused this First Amendment to EAR Agreement to be duly executed in its name by one of its duly authorized officers, all as of the date first written above.

FANNIE MAE                    GREEN TREE SERVCIING LLC

By:      /s/ Tara Malone_________             By:     /s/ Cheryl Collins___________

Name:     Tara Malone___________             Name:     Cheryl Collins______________

Title:     Vice President__________             Title:     SVP and Treasurer__________

Date:     6/1/14________________             Date:     6/1/14____________________





SCHEDULE 1


Original Advancing Servicer
or Originator
SSID Number
Transfer Date
Bank of America, N.A.
261840154
261840197
261847000
261840200
261840812
April 1, 2013
May 1, 2013
June 1, 2013
September 1, 2013
December 1, 2013
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
261840111
261840120
261840138
261840146
261840804
261840855
January 31, 2013

Flagstar Capital Markets
Corporation
261840103
January 1, 2013
National City Bank and
National City Mortgage
Services
261840057
November 1, 2009
Bank United
261840049
April 1, 2009
Hayhurst Mortgage, Inc
261840073
February 1, 2010
Option One
261840022
July 1, 2008
Franklin Bank
261840065
December 1, 2009
Green Tree Servicing LLC
261840006
N/A
EverBank
261840235
261840243
261840251
261840260
May 1, 2014
Advances made by Servicer relating to Mortgage Loans in each of the above referenced acquired portfolios after the applicable Transfer Date shall be Eligible Advances.




SCHEDULE 2


Original Advancing Servicer
Legacy Advance Type; Early
Reimbursement rate
Transfer Date
Bank of America, N.A.
P&I Delinquency Advance: 100%
T&I Escrow Advances: 80%
Corporate Servicing Advances: 80%
April 1, 2013
May 1, 2013
June 1, 2013
September 1, 2013
December 1, 2013
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
P&I Delinquency Advance: 100%
T&I Escrow Advances: 80%
Corporate Servicing Advances: 80%
January 31, 2013
Flagstar Capital Markets
Corporation

P&I Delinquency Advance: 100%
T&I Escrow Advances: 80%
Corporate Servicing Advances: 80%
January 1, 2013
National City Bank and
National City Mortgage
Services
P&I Delinquency Advance: 100%
T&I Escrow Advances: 80%
Corporate Servicing Advances: 80%
November 1, 2009
EverBank**
P&I Delinquency Advance: 100%
T&I Escrow Advances: 80%
Corporate Servicing Advances: 80%
May 1, 2014
** Legacy Servicing Advances applicable to servicing transferred from EverBank shall not exceed Sixty million ($60,000,000) dollars and Servicer may request early reimbursement of such Legacy Servicing Advances through August 1, 2014.




EXHIBIT 10.3

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED RECEIVABLES LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED RECEIVABLES LOAN AGREEMENT (this “ Amendment ”), dated as of March 28, 2014, is by and among GREEN TREE ADVANCE RECEIVABLES II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “ Borrower ”), GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as administrator (in such capacity, the “Administrator”), THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FROM TIME TO TIME PARTY HERETO, as Lenders (each, a “Lender”), WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (“WFB”) as “Calculation Agent”, “Account Bank”, “Verification Agent” and “Securities Intermediary” and WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, formerly known as Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC (“WFCF”), as agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, together with any successor thereto in such capacity, the “Agent”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Receivables Loan Agreement (defined below).
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Administrator, WFB, as Calculation Agent, Account Bank, Verification Agent and Securities Intermediary, the Lenders and WFCF, as Agent and Lender, are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Receivables Loan Agreement dated as of May 2, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Receivables Loan Agreement ”);
WHEREAS, Section 11.01 of the Receivables Loan Agreement provides that the Receivables Loan Agreement may be amended as follows;
WHEREAS, the Agent represents Lenders whose Commitments are greater than fifty percent (50%) of the Maximum Facility Limit as of the date hereof;
WHEREAS, the parties to the Receivables Loan Agreement hereto have agreed to amend the Receivables Loan Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above, the terms and conditions contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiently of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Amendments to the Receivables Loan Agreement . Effective as of the date hereof and subject to the execution of this Amendment by the parties hereto, the Receivables Loan Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.1      In Section 1.01, the definition of “Tangible Net Worth” is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
Tangible Net Worth ” means, for the Administrator, as of any date of determination, (i) the net worth of the Administrator determined in accordance with GAAP, minus (ii) all intangibles

097231-0021-14963-Active.16114466.1        



determined in accordance with GAAP (including goodwill but excluding originated and purchased mortgage servicing rights) and any and all advances to, investments in and receivables held from Affiliates.”
1.1      Section 8.01(g) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“(g) RESERVED.”
1.2      Section 8.01(h) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“(h) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of the Administrator:
(i)
the Tangible Net Worth of the Administrator shall be less than the greater of (x) $200,000,000 or (y) 5.00% of the Administrator’s outstanding recourse Indebtedness (excluding non-recourse Indebtedness and Indebtedness of Parent, including, without limitation, Indebtedness of the Parent with respect to which the Administrator has provided a guaranty or has granted a Lien of any kind in any of the Administrator’s property or assets);
(ii)
the Administrator shall have unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in an amount that is less than the greater of (x) $25,000,000 or (y) 1.00% of the Administrator’s outstanding recourse Indebtedness (excluding non-recourse Indebtedness and Indebtedness of Parent, including, without limitation, Indebtedness of the Parent with respect to which the Administrator has provided a guaranty or has granted a Lien of any kind in any of the Administrator’s property or assets); or
(iii)
the ratio of Administrator’s Indebtedness (excluding non-recourse Indebtedness and Indebtedness of Parent, including, without limitation, Indebtedness of the Parent with respect to which the Administrator has provided a guaranty or has granted a Lien of any kind in any of the Administrator’s property or assets) to Tangible Net Worth exceeds 12:1.”
Section 2.      Reference to and Effect on the Receivables Loan Agreement . From and after the date hereof, each reference in the Receivables Loan Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof,” “herein,” “hereby” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Receivables Loan Agreement as amended hereby, and each reference to the Receivables Loan Agreement in any other document, instrument or agreement executed and/or delivered in connection with the Receivables Loan Agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Receivables Loan Agreement as amended hereby.
Section 3.      CHOICE OF LAW . THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH , THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (INCLUDING SECTIONS 5-1401 OF THE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAWS OF

097231-0021-14963-Active.16114466.1        



THE STATE OF NEW YORK BUT OTHERWISE WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES).
Section 4.      Execution of Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
Section 5.      Headings . Section headings in this Amendment are included herein for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Amendment for any other purpose.
[signatures appear on the following pages]


097231-0021-14963-Active.16114466.1        



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date hereof.
GREEN TREE ADVANCE RECEIVABLES II LLC, As Borrower
By: /s/ Brian F. Corey    
Name: Brian F. Corey
Title:    Sr. Vice President
& Secretary
GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC,
As Administrator
By: /s/ Brian F. Corey    
Name: Brian F. Corey
Title:    Sr. Vice President
General Counsel
        & Secretary

Signature Page to Amendment No. 6
to A&R Receivables Loan Agreement




097231-0021-14963-Active.16114466.1        




WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
As Calculation Agent, Account Bank and
Securities Intermediary
By: /s/ Mark DeFabio    
Name: Mark DeFabio
Title:    Vice President
WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC,
As Agent and as Lender
By: /s/ Mark Weide    
Name: Mark Weide
Title:    Assistant Vice President

Signature Page to Amendment No. 6
to A&R Receivables Loan Agreement




097231-0021-14963-Active.16114466.1        

EXHIBIT 10.4


EXECUTION COPY
SEPARATION AGREEMENT
This Separation Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into this 8th day of August, 2014 by and between Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Company”) and Keith A. Anderson (“Employee”).
WHEREAS , Employee entered into an employment agreement with the Company effective July 1, 2011 (“Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS , Employee has indicated his desire to terminate his employment with the Company; and
WHEREAS , the Company wishes for Employee to remain in his current position with the Company until the earlier of ninety days from the date of this Agreement and such date as the Company, at its discretion, shall determine (the “Termination Date”); and
WHEREAS , following the Termination Date, the Company wishes to retain Employee as a consultant to the Company for a period of one year; and
WHEREAS , Employee has agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, to remain with the Company as provided herein and thereafter to enter into a consultancy agreement with the Company substantially in the form attached hereto as Appendix 1 (the “Consultancy Agreement”); and
WHEREAS , the parties desire to provide for certain payments and benefits as consideration for Employee’s agreement to remain with the Company, accept certain restrictive covenants, execute a general release of claims, and enter into the Consultancy Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual promises and consideration set forth herein, it is hereby agreed:
1.
Employee shall remain in the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, reporting to the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and shall continue to perform Employee’s current duties in good faith, to the best of Employee’s abilities and consistent with past practice until the Termination Date.
2.
In consideration of Employee continuing in Employee’s current position as set forth in Section 1 and his compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, Employee’s execution of, and failure to revoke the General Release (as defined and further discussed in Section 3), and execution of the Consultancy Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto, Employee shall receive the following compensation (“Compensation Benefits”) at the times and in the manner specified (all payments to be net of applicable withholding and paid in accordance with the Company’s ordinary payroll practices):
(a)
From the date of this Agreement through the Termination Date:
(i)
Employee’s base salary at a rate of $430,000 per year (“Base Salary”),
(ii)
Continued participation in Company health, dental and vision benefits (subject to the payment of ordinary Employee contributions), and
(iii)
Payment for accrued but unused vacation in accordance with Company policy.
(b)
The Legacy Payment in the amount of $50,093.96 to be paid in the first regular payroll after the Termination Date.
(c)
Lump sum payments to be paid in the years designated below, and except as expressly provided by Section 2(c)(iii) and Exhibit 2, at the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company pays bonuses to its executives pursuant to the Company’s Management Incentive Plan for the prior year, or (ii) March 15 of the year of payment.



(i)
An amount, to be pro-rated to the Termination Date, which shall be, before pro-ration, no less than the lesser of (A) the product of a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the 2014 MIP bonuses awarded to Mark O’Brien, Gary Tillett, Denmar Dixon and Patricia Cook and the denominator of which is $3,200,000 (subject to adjustment if any of the foregoing’s target is adjusted) multiplied by $860,000 and (B) $860,000 (referred to herein as “Lump Sum No. 1,” see example of the calculation in Subsection (A) in Exhibit 1 hereto). In the event bonuses to be awarded to those listed in subsection (A) above have not been determined by March 15, then payment shall be made pursuant to Subsection (B). In the event that thereafter, payments to those mentioned in Subsection (A) result in a lower amount due to Employee, then the difference shall be deducted from future payments.
(ii)
An amount equal to the product of (A) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days remaining in 2014 following the Termination Date and the denominator of which is 365, and (B) $800,000, to be paid in 2015 (“Lump Sum No. 2”), and
(iii)
An amount equal to $800,000 less the amount of Lump Sum No. 2, to be paid partly in 2015 (“Lump Sum No. 3”) and partly in 2016 (“Lump Sum No. 4”) as provided in the example in Exhibit 2.
(d)
Treatment of equity awards:
(i)
All equity awards vested as of the date of the Termination Date shall remain vested and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the respective award agreements.
(ii)
The following equity awards are unvested as of the date of this Agreement and shall, subject to Employee’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, the provisions of Sections 3 and 7, and the terms and conditions of the Consultancy Agreement, be treated as set forth in the following table:
            
Award Date
No. Shares
Award/Option Price
Vest Date
Treatment
2/28/12
15,857
$20.57
2/28/15
Retain - Vest 2/28/15
11/1/11
20,000
RSU
11/1/15
Retain - Vest 11/1/15
4/3/2013
43,859
$33.59
4/3/16
Forfeit
3/24/14
8,305
RSU
3/24/16
Retain - Vest 3/24/16
3/24/14
49,835
Perf Sh
12/31/16
Forfeit
3/24/14
8,306
RSU
3/24/17
Retain - Vest 3/24/17

(iii)
Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (d)(ii), the foregoing awards shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in their respective award agreements.
(e)
Commencing on the Termination Date, Employee and the Company shall enter into the Consultancy Agreement which shall include the following terms:
(i)
Term - 12 months;
(ii)
Consulting fee - $35,833 per month;
(iii)
An amount equal to the monthly excess of the cost of COBRA continuation coverage and the amount that Company employees pay for similar coverage.
3.
Employee’s right to Compensation Benefits following the Termination Date is subject to Employee’s execution and delivery of a general release within thirty days following the Termination Date (the “General Release”). The General Release shall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Appendix 2. No Compensation Benefits shall be paid or provided to Employee, unless and until such time as (i) Employee has executed the General Release and delivered it to the Company, and (ii) the revocation period in the General Release has expired without an exercise of the revocation rights by Employee.



4.
Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement or the release attached as Appendix 2 to the contrary, Employee shall remain liable for any obligations incurred as a result of violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
5.
Employee agrees to resign as an officer and/or director of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, effective as of the Termination Date, or such earlier date as the Company may request.
6.
Employee agrees that all inventions, improvements, trade secrets, reports, manuals, computer programs, systems, tapes and other ideas and materials developed or invented by Employee during the period of Employee’s employment with the Company, either solely or in collaboration with others, which relate to the actual or anticipated business or research of the Company, which result from or are suggested by any work Employee may do for the Company, or which result from use of the Company's premises or the Company's or its customers' property (collectively, the "Developments") shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. Employee hereby assigns to the Company Employee’s entire right and interest in any such Developments, and will hereafter execute any documents in connection therewith that the Company may reasonably request.
7.
It is understood and agreed that Employee has had substantial relationships with specific businesses and personnel, prospective and existing, vendors, contractors, customers, and employees of the Company that are valuable and result in the creation of goodwill, and that the protection of those relationships is a material component of the consideration provided by the Company hereunder. Therefore, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Company’s Board of Directors, during, and for a period of 12 months following the termination of the Consultancy Agreement, Employee agrees that Employee shall not, directly or indirectly:
(a)
Solicit, divert, or accept business (either directly or indirectly) from any customer or prospective customer of the Company or any corporation controlling, controlled by, under common control with, or otherwise related to the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliated companies (collectively “Affiliates”);
(b)
Accept employment with, or become an independent contractor for, or accept any consideration for services rendered to or on behalf of any Competitor of the Company or its Affiliates, within the United States of America, or acquire any ownership interest in a Competitor of the Company, provided that the foregoing shall not prohibit ownership of stock in any publicly traded corporation where Employee holds less than 1% of the stock of the corporation (for purposes of this Agreement “Competitor” shall mean any business or division or unit of any business which provides, in whole or in part, in the United States of America, the same or similar services and/or products offered by the Company as described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2014); or
(c)
Hire any employees or independent contractors of the Company and/or solicit or entice any such persons to leave the employ of the Company or its Affiliates.
Employee agrees and acknowledges that the promises and covenants not to compete set forth above have a unique, very substantial and immeasurable value to the Company, that the Company is engaged in a highly competitive industry, and that Employee is receiving significant consideration in exchange for these promises and covenants. Employee acknowledges that the promises and covenants set forth above are necessary for the reasonable and proper protection of the Company’s legitimate business interests; and that each and every promise and covenant is reasonable with respect with respect to the activities restricted, geographic scope and length of time.
8.
Following the termination of Employee’s employment with the Company for any reason, neither Employee nor any director or executive officer of the Company shall, directly or indirectly, by or on the Employee’s behalf, or by or on the Company’s behalf, or in conjunction with any other person, persons, company, partnership, corporation, business entity or otherwise:
(a)
Make any statements or announcements or permit anyone to make any public statements or announcements concerning the termination of Employee’s employment with the Company other than mutually agreed upon press release(es), required public filings or other ordinary course disclosures or discussions, or



(b)
Make any statements that are inflammatory, detrimental, slanderous, or negative in any way to the interests of Employee or the Company or its subsidiaries, or their respective officers, directors employees, business(es) or operations.
(c)
Nothing in this section shall prevent either party from testifying or responding truthfully to any request for discovery or giving testimony in any judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding or any government inquiry, investigation or other proceeding or from making any public statements or filings required by law.
9.
Employee acknowledges and agrees that Employee will respect and safeguard the Company’s property, trade secrets and confidential information. Employee will not disclose any Company trade secrets or confidential information acquired while an employee of the Company to any other person or entity, including without limitation, a subsequent employer, or use such information in any manner. Employee understands and agrees that he will remain subject to United States insider trading laws subsequent to the Termination Date and agrees to provide the Company’s Secretary, after the close of the market on any day on which Employee trades in Company stock, the details of such trade(s), for a period of six months following the Termination Date and the Company will file appropriate Form 4’s with the SEC on Employee’s behalf. Should Employee fail to timely provide such information, Employee shall be responsible for any such filings.
10.    Section 409A and Potential Delay in Payment.
(a)
The intent of the parties is that payments and benefits under this Agreement comply with Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder (except to the extent exempt as short-term deferrals or otherwise) and, accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted, this Agreement shall be interpreted to be in compliance therewith. Attached as Exhibit 2 to this Agreement is a Schedule of payments which the Company and Employee believes, after consultation with counsel, complies with Section 409A of the Code. If the Company reasonably determines that any payment or benefit due under this Agreement, or any other amount that may become due to Employee after the Termination Date, is subject to Section 409A of the Code, and also determines that Employee is a “specified employee,” as defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, upon Employee’s termination of employment for any reason other than death (whether by resignation or otherwise), no amount may be paid to Employee or on Employee’s behalf earlier than six months after the Termination Date (or, if earlier, Employee’s death) if such payment would violate the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder, and payment shall be made, or commence to be made, as the case may be, on the date that is six months and one day after the Termination Date (or, if earlier, one day after Employee’s death). For this purpose, Employee will be considered a “specified employee” if Employee is a “key employee”, within the exact meaning of “specified employee” and “key employee” defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. Notwithstanding the above, the Company hereby retains discretion to make determinations regarding the identification of “specified employees” and to take any necessary corporate action in connection with such determination.
(b)
A termination of employment shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of any provision of this Agreement providing for the payment of any amounts or benefits subject to Section 409A of the Code upon or following a termination of employment unless such termination is also a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and, for purposes of any such provision of this Agreement, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment,” or like terms shall mean “separation from service.” The determination of whether and when a separation from service has occurred shall be made in a manner consistent with, and based on the presumptions set forth in, U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h) or any successor provision thereto. It is intended that each installment, if any, of the payments and benefits provided hereunder shall be treated as a separate “payment” for purposes of Section 409A of the Code. Neither the Company nor Employee shall have the right to accelerate or defer the



delivery of any such payments or benefits except to the extent specifically permitted or required by Section 409A of the Code. All reimbursements and in-kind benefits provided under this Agreement or otherwise to Employee shall be made or provided in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code to the extent that such reimbursements or in-kind benefits are subject to Section 409A of the Code.
11.
It is agreed and understood that this Agreement, the Appendices hereto, and the documents incorporated herein by reference shall constitute the entire agreement between Employee and the Company with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede all prior agreements, discussions, understandings and proposals (written or oral) relating to Employee’s employment with the Company, including without limitation, the Employment Agreement, as amended. This Agreement shall be interpreted under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to conflicts of laws. Any dispute over the terms and conditions or application of this Agreement shall be resolved through non-binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”). The arbitration will be heard by one arbitrator to be chosen as provided by the rules of the AAA and shall be held at a mutually acceptable location as designated by the parties. In the event the dispute is not resolved through arbitration, either party may submit the matter to the court having jurisdiction over the dispute. The parties expressly submit to the jurisdiction of those courts, and their appellate courts, for adjudication of all such disputes, claims, actions and lawsuits arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or for alleged breach of this Agreement, and agree not to bring any such action or proceeding in any other court. Both parties waive any defense of inconvenient forum as to the maintenance of any action or proceeding brought pursuant to this Section 11 in those courts, and waive any bond, surety, or other security that might be required of the other party with respect to any aspect of such action, to the extent permitted by law. Provided, however, that either party may bring a proceeding in a different court, jurisdiction or forum to obtain collection of any judgment, or to obtain enforcement of any injunction or order, entered against the other party.
12. Employee agrees and acknowledges that in the event of a breach or threatened breach by Employee of one or more of the covenants and promises described in Sections 7 - 9, the Company will suffer irreparable harm that is not compensable solely by damages. Employee agrees that under such circumstances, no further payments, rights or benefits provided under Section 2 of this Agreement will be due to Employee, and, in the event the breach or threatened breach occurs subsequent to the Termination Date, Employee must repay to the Company any amounts described in Section 2(b) paid to him. Notwithstanding the arbitration provisions of Section 11, the Company shall be entitled, upon application to a court of the State of Minnesota, to obtain injunctive or other relief to enforce these promises and covenants. The Company shall, in addition to the remedies provided in this Agreement, be entitled to avail itself of all such other remedies as may now or hereafter exist at law or in equity for compensation and for the specific enforcement of the covenants in this Agreement. Resort to any remedy provided for in this Agreement or provided by law will not prevent the concurrent or subsequent employment of any other appropriate remedy or remedies or preclude the Company or the Company’s recovery of monetary damages and compensation.
13. Employee agrees that, subject to reimbursement of Employee’s reasonable expenses, he will fully cooperate with the Company and any of its Affiliates and their counsel with respect to any matter (including any pending or future litigation, investigations, or governmental proceedings) which relates to matters with which Employee was involved during his employment with the Company. Employee will render such cooperation in a timely manner upon reasonable notice from the Company. In the event the Company seeks Employee cooperation after the term of the Consulting Agreement, the Company shall pay Employee a mutually acceptable per diem rate for Employee’s cooperation hereunder.
14. This Agreement is not to be construed as an admission of liability of any violation of any federal, state or local statute, ordinance or regulation or of any duty owed by the Company or any other person to Employee, or by Employee or any other person to the Company. There have been no such violations, and both the Company and Employee specifically deny any such violations.



15. Employee acknowledges that Employee has retained legal counsel to provide advice on the terms and conditions of this Agreement and that in agreeing to this Agreement Employee has not relied in any way upon representations or statements of the Company other than those representations or statements set forth in this Agreement.
16. Employee agrees that Employee will not apply for reinstatement with the Company or its Affiliates or seek in any way to be reinstated, reemployed or hired by the Company in the future.
17. This Agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Company and Employee and their respective successors, executors, administrators and heirs. Employee may not make any assignment of this Agreement or any interest herein, by operation of law or otherwise. The Company may assign this Agreement to any successor to all or substantially all of its assets and business by means of liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, transfer of assets, or otherwise. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Employee’s legal representatives. To the extent permitted by law, the Company will require any successor who acquires all or substantially all of the assets and business by means of liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, transfer of assets or otherwise to expressly assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company will be required to perform it is no such succession had taken place.
18.
Notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement, the Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Employee and the Company on August 3, 2011 continues to remain in full force and effect and is not superseded, replaced and or otherwise modified by the Separation Agreement including Appendices 1 and 2 thereof.
19. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid and effective under applicable law. However, if any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this Agreement shall be reformed, construed and enforced as though the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Employee and the Company have executed this Agreement as of the dates specified below.
WALTER INVESTMENT                      KEITH A. ANDERSON
MANAGEMENT CORP.



By: _/s/ Mark O'Brien_________________              _____/s/ Keith A. Anderson_____
Mark O’Brien                                
Title: Chairman and CEO                    Date:_ __8/8/14_____ __________

Date:__ 8/8/14_ ______________________



EXHIBIT 1

Sample Calculation for Purposes of Subsection 2(c)(i)(A)
Name
Target Bonus
Bonus Awarded
O’Brien
1,000,000
750,000
Tillett
850,000
850,000
Dixon
750,000
800,000
Cook
600,000
650,000
Total
3,200,000
3,050,000

Anderson Lump Sum No. 1 = 3,050,000/3,200,000 x 860,000 = $819,688 (before pro ration)
Name
Target Bonus
Bonus Awarded
O’Brien
1,000,000
1,500,000
Tillett
850,000
850,000
Dixon
750,000
600,000
Cook
600,000
650,000
Total
3,200,000
3,600,000

Anderson Lump Sum No. 1 = 3,600,000/3,200,000 x 860,000 = $967,500 (before pro ration),
Lump Sum Number 1 cap = $860,000 (before pro ration)



EXHIBIT 2

Example: October 31 Termination Date this would result in the following payments:

Consulting fees totaling $430,000 paid bi-weekly for twelve months.
Legacy Payment of $50,093.96 paid with first consulting fee payment.
Assuming Lump Sum No. 1 before pro-ration equals $860,000, Lump Sum No. 1 after pro-ration equals $860,000/12*10 = $716,667 paid before March 15, 2015.
Lump Sum No. 2 equals $800,000/12*2 = $133,333 paid before March 15, 2015.
Remaining $666,667 to be paid:
Lump Sum No. 3: $666,667 - ($520,000-$215,000-$50,093.96-$133,333) = $545,093.96 paid no later than December 31, 2015
Lump Sum No. 4: $666,667 - $545,093.96 = $121,573.04 paid by March 15, 2016




APPENDIX 1             
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

This Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of ___________, 2014 by and between Keith A. Anderson (the "Consultant") and Walter Investment Management Corp. (“WIMC” or the “Company”).

WHEREAS , WIMC and Consultant entered into a Separation Agreement dated August 5, 2014 (the “Separation Agreement”) to which this Agreement was attached as Appendix 1 and General Release of Claims (the “Release”) was attached as Appendix 2; and

WHEREAS , WIMC desires to retain the services of the Consultant for a limited period of time of one year to assist WIMC on an as needed basis with the management and operations of its mortgage servicing and originations businesses (the “Services” as further defined below) and the Consultant is willing to provide the Services to and advise WIMC on an agreed basis as hereinafter specified.

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE I
PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES

1.1    WIMC hereby engages the Consultant to perform the Services and the Consultant hereby accepts such engagement. “Services” as referred to in this Agreement shall mean (a) the provision of advice and consultation pertaining to the management and operations of the Company’s mortgage servicing and originations businesses as the Company may reasonably request, (b) assistance with any past or future litigation and/or regulatory or similar investigations, including, without limitation providing testimony to the extent deemed appropriate by Company counsel and meeting with regulators, and (c) such other matters related to the Company’s business as the Company may reasonably request.  Consultant agrees not to accept any third party employment that would materially impact his availability to perform the Services, and further agrees to be available to perform the Services upon reasonable notice provided by the Company.  Travel may be required in connection with the performance of the Services.

1.2    All Services under this Agreement shall be performed by the Consultant.

1.3    The Consultant represents and warrants that he shall perform the Services with the care, skill and diligence customarily provided by a professional consultant in the performance of services similar to the Services to be provided hereunder.

ARTICLE II
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND WORK PRODUCT

2.1     The Consultant shall at all times maintain the confidentiality of all Confidential Information. The Consultant shall take all such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no Confidential Information is published, disclosed, communicated or otherwise provided or made available to any other person by the Consultant, except with the prior consent of WIMC. The Consultant shall keep the Confidential Information in a secure place at all times and shall comply with WIMC’s instructions with regard to copying, recording or otherwise reproducing any of the Confidential Information.

2.2     “Confidential Information” as referred to in this Agreement shall mean all information, in any form, emanating from the Company or any of its subsidiaries or provided to WIMC or the Consultant by any of the Company’s existing or prospective agents, contractors, customers, suppliers or licensees and relating to any of their practices, services or products, which is used in the business of WIMC. Confidential Information may include, but is not limited to, all data, technical information, documents, and materials, work product, reports, studies, memoranda, statistics, photographs, films, audio and video tapes, drawings, designs, sketches, specifications,



equipment, techniques, computer programs, software and printouts, trade secrets, know-how, financial data and other business information made available or provided to the Consultant by WIMC in connection with the work product developed, prepared or produced by the Consultant as part of the Services, except information which are, or later become, a part of the public domain through publication or communication by persons other than the Consultant.

2.3    The Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Confidential Information and any and all documents, materials and other tangible items prepared or assembled by the Consultant in connection with Services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement (“Work Product”) are and shall remain the property of WIMC. Upon request by WIMC, the Consultant shall deliver the Confidential Information and the Work Product to WIMC, and the Consultant may retain only a copy for his business records, which shall continue to be subject to the provisions of Section 2.1.

2.4    The Consultant acknowledges that material conditions of his Agreement with WIMC include the following: (i) all inventions, including, but not limited to, development, discoveries, concepts, ideas, processes, software, techniques, formulae and products, as well as improvements or know-how related thereto (whether or not patentable or copyrightable and collectively referred to as "Inventions"), relating to any activities of WIMC during the Consultant's consultancy are the sole property of WIMC; and (ii) all Inventions related to the products of WIMC made or conceived by the Consultant, solely or jointly with others during the period that he/she is working as a Consultant for WIMC, or with the use of WIMC facilities, materials or personnel, or which result from or are suggested by or otherwise arise out of Consultant's work at WIMC, shall be the sole property of WIMC. Without royalty or other consideration except as set forth herein, the Consultant agrees that he:

2.4.1    Shall inform WIMC promptly and fully of each such invention in writing, and upon request by WIMC, shall provide a written report, setting forth in detail the procedures employed and the results achieved; and

2.4.2    Shall apply, at WIMC 's request and expense, or assist WIMC in applying for United States and/or foreign letters patent or for copyrights either in the Consultant's name or as designated by WIMC; and

2.4.3    Shall assign (and does hereby assign) to WIMC all of Consultant's rights, title and interest in and to such inventions, and to applications for United States and/or foreign letters patent or copyrights granted upon such inventions; and

2.4.4    Shall execute and deliver promptly to WIMC such written instruments and do such other acts, as may be necessary in the opinion of WIMC to obtain and maintain United States and/or foreign letters patent or copyrights and to vest the entire right and title for such patents or copyrights in WIMC.

ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT

3.1    The Consultant shall be compensated for Services authorized under this Agreement, in the total amount of $430,000 paid bi-weekly. In the event this Agreement is terminated by WIMC prior to the one-year Term identified in Section 4.1 below, and Consultant has not violated the terms of this Agreement or the Separation Agreement or the Release during the Term, the Company shall remain obligated to continue to pay Consultant on a bi-weekly basis through the remainder of the original Term.
  
3.2    WIMC will reimburse the Consultant for all reasonable travel and extraordinary expenses (in accordance with WIMC’s policy) incurred at the request of WIMC and in relationship to the Services, provided such expenses are approved in advance by WIMC. The Consultant will provide WIMC with the pertinent expense vouchers or receipts and upon receipt WIMC will remit the reimbursement to the Consultant forthwith.




3.3    Consultant hereby represents and warrants that no part of the fee paid by WIMC will be used directly or indirectly to make payments, gratuities, emoluments or to confer any other benefit to an official of any government or any political party.

ARTICLE IV
TERM

4.1    The Agreement shall commence on the date set forth above and shall extend for a period of one year (“Term”) unless earlier terminated by WIMC pursuant to Section 3.1. The provisions of Articles II, III and V shall survive the termination of this Agreement without regard to the reason for the termination; such termination shall not alter or affect WIMC’s rights and obligations created by those sections.

4.2    Upon expiration or termination, the Consultant shall immediately assemble all Work Product and all Confidential Information in the Consultant’s possession or control and shall return them to WIMC. WIMC shall thereafter have the right to use any Work Product produced under this Agreement without any further compensation to the Consultant.

ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS

5.1     Independent Contractor . The Consultant is retained by WIMC only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement. The Consultant undertakes the performance of the Services under this Agreement as an independent contractor, and not as an employee of WIMC. As such, the Consultant is not entitled to benefits and privileges accorded to staff and personnel by virtue of their status as employees. Nothing in this Agreement authorizes the Consultant to make any contract, agreement, warranty or representation on behalf of WIMC or to incur any debt in the name of WIMC. The Consultant shall maintain all permits, licenses and certifications necessary for the conduct of his business and all fees and expenses for same shall not be reimbursable as expenses under Section 2.2. Any and all taxes, insurance, employee benefits and other costs of doing business shall be paid by the Consultant and shall not be reimbursable as expenses under Section 2.2.

    5.2     Indemnification .    The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless WIMC, against any and all loss, damage, lien and liability, and from any and all claims and demands, suits, actions and judgments for damages on account of or by reason of bodily injury (including death) which may be sustained by any person, including Consultant , and from all costs and expenses in any such suits, demands, actions, claims or proceedings, which may be brought against WIMC to the extent caused by or arising out of or in connection with (1) the negligence of Consultant in connection with any work done or performed by Consultant or Consultant’s failure to do or perform any work required to be done under the terms of this Agreement, (2) Consultant’s failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement, or (3) Consultant’s failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations. Provided, however, that Consultant shall have no indemnification obligation pursuant to this Section 5.2 with respect to any loss, damage, lien, liability, claim, demand, suit, action or judgment that is caused by or arises out of a negligent act or omission by WIMC.

5.3     Non-Competition . Consultant agrees that the terms and conditions of Paragraphs 7(a) and (b) of the Separation Agreement shall be incorporated herein by reference during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of one year thereafter.

5.4     Non-Solicitation . Consultant agrees that the terms and conditions of Paragraph 7(c) of the Separation Agreement shall be incorporated herein by reference during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of one year thereafter.

5.5     Governing Law and Jurisdiction . The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. The parties agree that any action arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be resolved in the federal or state courts in the State of Minnesota.




5.6     Notices .    All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered to the parties at the addresses provided below:

WIMC:
Walter Investment Management Corp.
3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 1100
Tampa, Florida 33647
Attn: General Counsel

CONSULTANT:
        
Keith A. Anderson
9606 Whistling Valley Road
Lake Elmo, MN 55042

5.7     No Conflict . As an inducement to WIMC to retain Consultant, Consultant represents and warrants that there exists no impediment or restraint, contractual or otherwise on Consultant’s power, right or ability to perform the Services for WIMC.

5.8     Execution in Counterparts .    This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original and which counterparts together shall constitute a single instrument.

5.9     Entire Agreement . This Agreement and any Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement between the Consultant and WIMC with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor any part hereof may be changed, modified, supplemented or deleted except as agreed in writing by the Consultant and WIMC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers or representatives.

CONSULTANT
WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP.


__________________________            By:__________________________
Keith A. Anderson    
  
Date:________________________            Date:_________________________






APPENDIX 2
GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
This    General Release of Claims ("Release") is entered into by and between Walter Investment Management Corp., and its subsidiaries, predecessors, successors, assigns, affiliates, insurers and related entities, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Employer”) and Keith A. Anderson (hereinafter “Employee”). In consideration for the mutual promises set forth below, Employer and Employee agree as follows:
1. Employer and Employee are parties to a Separation Agreement to which this Release has been attached and incorporated by reference. Employee’s employment with Employer has been terminated and, pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement, Employee must execute this Release in order to receive certain severance benefits and compensation described more fully in the Separation Agreement.
2. In consideration for the promises and covenants set forth in the Separation Agreement and this Release, including, specifically but without limitation, the general release set forth in paragraph 3 below, Employee shall receive the benefits set forth in Section 2 of the Separation Agreement. Payments to Employee will be made at such times as are set forth in the Separation Agreement.
3. Employee agrees, on behalf of himself, and his heirs, successors in interest and assigns that, except as specifically provided herein, Employee will not file, or cause to be filed, any charges, lawsuits, or other actions of any kind in any forum against Employer and/or its officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns and does hereby further release and discharge Employer and its officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns from any and all claims, causes of action, rights, demands, and obligations of whatever nature kind or character which Employee may have, known or unknown, against them (including those seeking equitable relief) alleging, without limitation, (a) breach of contract, (b) any tort claims, (c) any claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1966, as amended, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, (the “ADEA”) (except to the extent claims under the ADEA arise after the date on which this Release is signed by Employee), or the Americans with Disability Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, or under any other federal law, (d) any claims under any State law including the Florida Civil Rights Act, or under any local law or municipal ordinance, (e) any other claims relating in any way to Employer or the termination of that employment; and (f) any other claims alleging any violation of any constitution, statute, regulation, or the common law; provided, however, that this Release is not intended to waive or release any claim arising under the Separation Agreement, any right to workers compensation or unemployment compensation benefits, or any claim for the group insurance benefits accruing prior to the Termination Date, or any rights identified in Section 4 of this Release.
4. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Release to the contrary, the general release set forth in paragraph 3 shall not apply to any rights or claims under any equity, option or other Employer incentive plan or award, including, without limitation, those awards reflected in the table set forth in Section 2d(ii) of the Separation Agreement, which shall be governed by the terms and conditions of such plan(s) or award; nor shall it affect any rights or obligations that Employee or Employer may have pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement entered into between Employee and Employer as of August 3, 2011.
5. This Release shall not in any way be construed as an admission by Employer or Employee that they have acted wrongfully with respect to each other or that one party has any rights whatsoever against the other or the other released parties.
6. Employee and Employer specifically acknowledge the following:
a.
Employee does not release or waive any right or claim which Employee may have which arises after the date of this Release.
b.
In exchange for this general release, Employee acknowledges that Employee has received separate consideration beyond that which Employee is otherwise entitled to under Employer’s compensation policies or applicable law.



c.
Employee is releasing, among other rights, all claims and rights under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") and the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act ("OWBPA"), 29 U.S.C. §621, et seq .
d.
This Release shall not effect the Company or the Employee’s respective rights and obligations under the Indemnification Agreement between the parties dated August 3, 2011.
e.
Employee has twenty-one (21) days to consider this Release.
f.
Employee has fifteen (15) days to revoke this Release after executing it. However, no consideration will be paid after the Termination date until after the revocation of the acceptance period has expired. For the revocation to be effective, Employee must give written notice of Employee’s revocation to Employer’s General Counsel.
7. Should Employee breach any provision of this Release, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to Employer, (a) the Employer’s obligation to continue to pay the consideration set forth herein shall cease, Employer shall have no further obligation to Employee, and (c) Employer shall have the right to re-coup any amounts paid pursuant to the Separation Agreement. All other terms and conditions of this Release, including, but not limited to, the general release in paragraph 3 shall remain in full force and effect.
8. This Release shall be binding upon Employer, Employee and upon Employee's heirs, administrators, representatives, executors, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of Employer and the other released parties and their successors and assigns.
9. Employee and Employer acknowledge that this Release, the Separation Agreement, and the Indemnification Agreement between the parties dated August 3, 2011, shall be considered as one document and that, except as set forth herein and therein, completely express the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
10. Should any provision of this Release be declared or be determined by any Court to be illegal or invalid, the validity of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby and said illegal or invalid part, term or provision shall be deemed not to be a part of this Release.
11. This Release may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP.

__________________________________        By: _______________________________________        
Keith A. Anderson

Date: _____________________________        Name Printed: _______________________________        

Title: _______________________________

Date: _______________________________
                        





EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION BY MARK J. O’BRIEN
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark J. O’Brien, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the “Report”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
/s/ Mark J. O’Brien
Mark J. O’Brien
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2014



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION BY GARY L. TILLETT
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Gary L. Tillett, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the “Report”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
/s/ Gary L. Tillett
Gary L. Tillett
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 11, 2014





EXHIBIT 32
WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Mark J. O’Brien, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary L. Tillett, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Walter Investment Management Corp. (the “Company”), each certify to such officer’s knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
Date: August 11, 2014
By:
 
/s/ Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
Mark J. O’Brien
 
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
Date: August 11, 2014
By:
 
/s/ Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
Gary L. Tillett
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





EXHIBIT 99

                    
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 8, 2014

Investor and Media Contact : Whitney Finch
Vice President of Investor Relations
813.421.7694
wfinch@walterinvestment.com

WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. ANNOUNCES
RETIREMENT OF ITS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER



(Tampa, Fla.) – Walter Investment Management Corp. (NYSE: WAC) (“Walter Investment” or the “Company”) today announced the retirement of its Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Keith Anderson. Mr. Anderson will remain in his present position with the Company for ninety days to assist with the search for a successor and to transition the position. Thereafter, Mr. Anderson will continue as a consultant to the Company for one year.
Mr. Anderson joined Green Tree Servicing in 1996, holding various positions of increasing responsibility, before becoming EVP and COO of Walter Investment in 2012. During his tenure with Walter Investment, Mr. Anderson has been a key member of the Company’s management team, as Walter Investment’s strategic initiatives were defined and executed.
Mark J. O’Brien, Walter Investment’s Chairman and CEO said, “On behalf of our Board of Directors and the entire Walter Investment team, I want to thank Keith for his many contributions to Green Tree and to Walter Investment over the years. We are grateful for the thoughtful guidance and contributions provided by Keith during his tenure with the Company and we wish him the best in his well-deserved retirement.”
“I have great admiration and respect for the Walter Investment team which has made this decision very difficult for me,” said Mr. Anderson. “I would like to thank each of Walter Investment’s more than 6,600 employees who have helped ensure the success of the Company and I feel fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with so many remarkable individuals throughout the years. I will miss working with my many friends, peers and associates.”
The Company also announced it has commenced the search for a successor to Mr. Anderson which will include the assessment of internal as well as external candidates. Mr. O’Brien added, “We are pleased to have Keith remain with us and to assist with the orderly transition to a new COO.”
As previously announced, the Company plans to release second quarter earnings results and host a conference call and audio webcast to discuss the financial results at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 11, 2014.
About Walter Investment Management Corp.

Walter Investment Management Corp. is an asset manager, mortgage servicer and originator focused on finding solutions for consumers and credit owners. Based in Tampa, Fla., the Company has over 6,600 employees and


    

services a diverse loan portfolio. For more information about Walter Investment Management Corp., please visit the Company’s website at www.walterinvestment.com.