As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2020
1933 Act Registration No. 333-210186
1940 Act Registration No. 811-23147
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-1A
Registration Statement Under the Securities Act of 1933 | [ ] |
Pre-Effective Amendment No. __ | [ ] |
Post-Effective Amendment No. 176 | [X] |
and/or | |
Registration Statement Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 | [ ] |
Amendment No. 178 | [X] |
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (800) 621-1675
W. Scott Jardine, Esq., Secretary
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
First Trust Advisors L.P.
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copy to:
Eric F. Fess, Esq.
Chapman and Cutler LLP
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):
[ ] immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
[X] on August 10, 2020 pursuant to paragraph (b)
[ ] 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
[ ] on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
[ ] 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
[ ] on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.
If appropriate, check the following box:
[ ] this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.
Contents of Post-Effective Amendment No. 176
This Registration Statement comprises the following papers and contents:
The Facing Sheet
Part A - Prospectus for FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs
Part B – Statement of Additional Information for FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs
Part C - Other information
Signatures
Index to Exhibits
Exhibits
First Trust
Exchange-Traded Fund VIII |
Ticker Symbol: | BUFR |
Exchange: | Cboe BZX |
Management Fees | 0.20% |
Distribution and Service (12b-1) Fees | 0.00% |
Other Expenses(1) | 0.00% |
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses | 0.85% |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | 1.05% |
(1) | "Other Expenses" and "Aquired Fund Fees and Expenses" are estimates based on the expenses the Fund expects to incur for the current fiscal year. |
1 Year | 3 Years |
$107 | $334 |
• |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) –
www.ftportfolios.com/retail/etf/EtfSummary.aspx?Ticker=FFEB |
• |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) –
www.ftportfolios.com/retail/etf/EtfSummary.aspx?Ticker=FMAY |
• |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) –
www.ftportfolios.com/retail/etf/EtfSummary.aspx?Ticker=FAUG |
• |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) –
www.ftportfolios.com/retail/etf/EtfSummary.aspx?Ticker=FNOV |
• | Karan Sood, Managing Director of Cboe Vest |
• | Howard Rubin, Managing Director of Cboe Vest |
• | If SPY appreciates over the Target Outcome Period, the combination of FLEX Options and cash held by the Underlying ETF provides upside participation that is intended to match that of the price return of SPY, up to a cap that is determined at the start of the Target Outcome Period. |
• | If SPY decreases over the Target Outcome Period, the combination of FLEX Options and cash held by the Underlying ETF provides a payoff at expiration that is intended to compensate for losses experienced by SPY (if any), in an amount not to exceed 10% before fees, expenses and taxes. |
• | If SPY has decreased in price by more than 10% over the Target Outcome Period, the Underlying ETF will experience all subsequent losses on a one-to-one basis. |
• | The combination of cash equivalents (a) and the FLEX Options (b) seek to replicate the price returns of SPY. At the expiration date, these positions should realize a value equal to that of the price of SPY. |
• | Taken together, positions (c) and (d) produce the 10% “buffer,” where position (c) is the top end of the buffer and position (d) is the bottom end. The payoff at expiration will compensate for losses experienced by SPY (if any), in an amount not to exceed 10% of SPY at the beginning of a Target Outcome Period. |
• | The strike level of the FLEX Option in position (e) produces the cap and is chosen so that the combined net investment in (a) through (e) is approximately equal to the Underlying ETF’s NAV. |
• | The combination of positions (a) through (e) creates a maximum growth opportunity equal to the return experienced by SPY at expiration, not to exceed the cap, while providing a 10% buffer from losses, before fees and expenses. |
• | FFEB: Remaining Outcome Period, ___; Remaining Cap, ___; Remaining Downside Before Buffer, ___; Remaining Buffer, ___. |
• | FMAY: Remaining Outcome Period, ___; Remaining Cap, ___; Remaining Downside Before Buffer, ___; Remaining Buffer, ___. |
• | FAUG: Remaining Outcome Period, ___; Remaining Cap, ___; Remaining Downside Before Buffer, ___; Remaining Buffer, ___. |
• | FNOV: Remaining Outcome Period, ___; Remaining Cap, ___; Remaining Downside Before Buffer, ___; Remaining Buffer, ___. |
• | Remaining Outcome Period - The number of days remaining until the end of the Target Outcome Period. |
• | Remaining Cap - Based on the Underlying ETF’s current bid/ask midpoint, the best potential return if held to the end of the Target Outcome Period, assuming SPY meets or exceeds the cap. |
• | Remaining Downside Before Buffer - The amount of Underlying ETF loss that can be incurred prior to the buffer taking effect. |
• | Remaining Buffer - The current amount of the Underlying ETF’s stated buffer remaining. |
• | Mr. Sood has over ten years of experience in derivative based investment strategy design and trading. Mr. Sood joined Cboe Vest in 2012. Prior to joining Cboe Vest Mr. Sood worked at ProShares Advisors LLC. Prior to ProShares, Mr. Sood worked as a Vice President at Barclays Capital. Last based in New York, he was responsible for using derivatives to design structured investment strategies and solutions for the firm’s institutional clients in the Americas. Prior to his role in New York, Mr. Sood worked in similar capacity in London with Barclays Capital’s European clients. Mr. Sood received a master’s degree in Decision Sciences & Operations Research from London School of Economics & Political Science. He also holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. |
• | Mr. Rubin has over twenty years of experience as a portfolio manager. Mr. Rubin joined Cboe Vest in 2017. Prior to joining Cboe Vest, Mr. Rubin served as Director of Portfolio Management at ProShares Advisors LLC from December 2007 to September 2013. Mr. Rubin also served as Senior Portfolio Manager of ProFund Advisors LLC from November 2004 to December 2007 and Portfolio Manager of ProFund Advisors LLC from April 2000 through November 2004. Mr. Rubin holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. Mr. Rubin received a master’s degree in Finance from George Washington University. He also holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Wharton School of Finance, University of Pennsylvania. |
First Trust
Exchange-Traded Fund VIII |
FUND NAME | TICKER SYMBOL | EXCHANGE | ||
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs | BUFR | Cboe BZX |
(1) | The Fund may not issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act. |
(2) | The Fund may not borrow money, except as permitted under the 1940 Act. |
(3) | The Fund will not underwrite the securities of other issuers except to the extent the Fund may be considered an underwriter under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), in connection with the purchase and sale of portfolio securities. |
(4) | The Fund will not purchase or sell real estate or interests therein, unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing or selling securities or other instruments backed by real estate or of issuers engaged in real estate activities). |
(5) | The Fund may not make loans to other persons, except through (i) the purchase of debt securities permissible under the Fund's investment policies, (ii) repurchase agreements, or (iii) the lending of portfolio securities, provided that no such loan of portfolio securities may be made by the Fund if, as a result, the aggregate of such loans would exceed 33⅓% of the value of the Fund's total assets. |
(6) | The Fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the Fund from purchasing or selling options, futures contracts, forward contracts or other derivative instruments, or from investing in securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities). |
(7) | The Fund may not invest 25% or more of the value of its total assets in securities of issuers in any one industry or group of industries except to the extent that the underlying referenced index of the Underlying ETFs invest more than 25% of its assets in an industry or group of industries. This restriction does not apply to obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or securities of other investment companies. |
(1) | The Fund may invest in U.S. government securities, including bills, notes and bonds differing as to maturity and rates of interest, which are either issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. government agencies or instrumentalities. U.S. government securities include securities that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury, by various agencies of the U.S. government, or by various instrumentalities that have been established or sponsored by the U.S. government. U.S. Treasury securities are backed by the “full faith and credit” of the United States. Securities issued or guaranteed by federal agencies and U.S. government-sponsored instrumentalities may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Some of the U.S. government agencies that issue or guarantee securities include the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Farmers Home Administration, the Federal Housing Administration, the Maritime Administration, the Small Business Administration and The Tennessee Valley Authority. An instrumentality of the U.S. government is a government agency organized under federal charter with government supervision. Instrumentalities issuing or guaranteeing securities include, among others, the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal Land Banks, the Central Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks and the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”). In the case of those U.S. government securities not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, the investor must look principally to the agency or instrumentality issuing or guaranteeing the security for ultimate repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event that the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitment. The U.S. government, its agencies and instrumentalities do not guarantee the market value of their securities; consequently, the value of such securities may fluctuate. |
(2) | The Fund may invest in certificates of deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or savings and loan association. Such certificates are for a definite period of time, earn a specified rate of return and are normally negotiable. If such certificates of deposit are non-negotiable, they will be considered illiquid securities and be subject to the Fund's 15% restriction on investments in illiquid securities. Pursuant to the certificate of deposit, the issuer agrees to pay the amount deposited plus interest to the bearer of the certificate on the |
date specified thereon. Under current FDIC regulations, the maximum insurance payable as to any one certificate of deposit is $250,000; therefore, certificates of deposit purchased by the Fund may not be fully insured. The Fund may only invest in certificates of deposit issued by U.S. banks with at least $1 billion in assets. | |
(3) | The Fund may invest in bankers’ acceptances, which are short-term credit instruments used to finance commercial transactions. Generally, an acceptance is a time draft drawn on a bank by an exporter or an importer to obtain a stated amount of funds to pay for specific merchandise. The draft is then “accepted” by a bank that, in effect, unconditionally guarantees to pay the face value of the instrument on its maturity date. The acceptance may then be held by the accepting bank as an asset or it may be sold in the secondary market at the going rate of interest for a specific maturity. |
(4) | The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements, which involve purchases of debt securities with counterparties that are deemed by the Sub-Advisor to present acceptable credit risks. In such an action, at the time the Fund purchases the security, it simultaneously agrees to resell and redeliver the security to the seller, who also simultaneously agrees to buy back the security at a fixed price and time. This assures a predetermined yield for the Fund during its holding period since the resale price is always greater than the purchase price and reflects an agreed-upon market rate. Such actions afford an opportunity for the Fund to invest temporarily available cash. The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements only with respect to obligations of the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, certificates of deposit or bankers’ acceptances in which the Fund may invest. Repurchase agreements may be considered loans to the seller, collateralized by the underlying securities. The risk to the Fund is limited to the ability of the seller to pay the agreed-upon sum on the repurchase date; in the event of default, the repurchase agreement provides that the affected Fund is entitled to sell the underlying collateral. If the value of the collateral declines after the agreement is entered into, however, and if the seller defaults under a repurchase agreement when the value of the underlying collateral is less than the repurchase price, the Fund could incur a loss of both principal and interest. The portfolio managers monitor the value of the collateral at the time the action is entered into and at all times during the term of the repurchase agreement. The portfolio managers do so in an effort to determine that the value of the collateral always equals or exceeds the agreed-upon repurchase price to be paid to the Fund. If the seller were to be subject to a federal bankruptcy proceeding, the ability of the Fund to liquidate the collateral could be delayed or impaired because of certain provisions of the bankruptcy laws. |
(5) | The Fund may invest in bank time deposits, which are monies kept on deposit with banks or savings and loan associations for a stated period of time at a fixed rate of interest. There may be penalties for the early withdrawal of such time deposits, in which case the yields of these investments will be reduced. |
(6) | The Fund may invest in commercial paper, which are short-term unsecured promissory notes, including variable rate master demand notes issued by corporations to finance their current operations. Master demand notes are direct lending arrangements between the Fund and a corporation. There is no secondary market for the notes. However, they are redeemable by the Fund at any time. The Fund's portfolio managers will consider the financial condition of the corporation (e.g., earning power, cash flow and other liquidity ratios) and will continuously monitor the corporation’s ability to meet all of its financial obligations, because the Fund's liquidity might be impaired if the corporation were unable to pay principal and interest on demand. The Fund may invest in commercial paper only if it has received the highest rating from at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if unrated, judged by the Sub-Advisor to be of comparable quality. |
(7) | The Fund may invest in shares of money market funds, as consistent with its investment objective and policies. Shares of money market funds are subject to management fees and other expenses of those funds. Therefore, investments in money market funds will cause the Fund to bear proportionately the costs incurred by the money market funds’ operations. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in the shares of other investment companies. It is possible for the Fund to lose money by investing in money market funds. |
Name and
Year of Birth |
Position
and Offices with Trust |
Term of
Office and Year First Elected or Appointed |
Principal Occupations
During Past 5 Years |
Number of
Portfolios in the First Trust Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |
Other
Trusteeships or Directorships Held by Trustee During the Past 5 Years |
TRUSTEE WHO IS AN INTERESTED PERSON OF THE TRUST | |||||
James A. Bowen (1)
1955 |
Chairman of the Board and Trustee |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Chief Executive Officer, First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P.; Chairman of the Board of Directors, BondWave LLC (Software Development Company) and Stonebridge Advisors LLC (Investment Advisor) | 185 Portfolios | None |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | |||||
Richard E. Erickson
1951 |
Trustee |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Physician; Officer, Wheaton Orthopedics; Limited Partner, Gundersen Real Estate Limited Partnership (June 1992 to December 2016); Member, Sportsmed LLC (April 2007 to November 2015) | 185 Portfolios | None |
Thomas R. Kadlec
1957 |
Trustee |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
President, ADM Investor Services, Inc. (Futures Commission Merchant) | 185 Portfolios | Director of ADM Investor Services, Inc., ADM Investor Services International, Futures Industry Association, and National Futures Association |
Robert F. Keith
1956 |
Trustee |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
President, Hibs Enterprises (Financial and Management Consulting) | 185 Portfolios | Director of Trust Company of Illinois |
Name and
Year of Birth |
Position and
Offices with Trust |
Term of Office and
Length of Service |
Principal Occupations
During Past 5 Years |
OFFICERS OF THE TRUST | |||
James M. Dykas
1966 |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer (January 2016 to present), Controller (January 2011 to January 2016), Senior Vice President (April 2007 to January 2016), First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P.; Chief Financial Officer (January 2016 to present), BondWave LLC (Software Development Company) and Stonebridge Advisors LLC (Investment Advisor) |
W. Scott Jardine
1960 |
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
General Counsel, First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P.; Secretary and General Counsel, BondWave LLC; and Secretary, Stonebridge Advisors LLC |
Daniel J. Lindquist
1970 |
Vice President |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Managing Director, First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P. |
Kristi A. Maher
1966 |
Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Deputy General Counsel, First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P. |
Donald P. Swade
1972 |
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Senior Vice President (July 2016 to Present), Vice President (April 2012 to July 2016), First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P. |
Roger F. Testin
1966 |
Vice President |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Senior Vice President, First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P. |
Stan Ueland
1970 |
Vice President |
• Indefinite term
• Since inception |
Senior Vice President, First Trust Advisors L.P. and First Trust Portfolios L.P. |
(1) | Mr. Bowen is deemed an “interested person” of the Trust due to his position as Chief Executive Officer of First Trust, investment advisor of the Fund. |
Name of Trustee |
Estimated Compensation from
the Fund (1) |
Total Compensation from
the First Trust Fund Complex (2) |
Richard E. Erickson | $2,205 | $458,125 |
Thomas R. Kadlec | $2,205 | $451,450 |
Robert F. Keith | $2,194 | $454,098 |
Niel B. Nielson | $2,216 | $440,930 |
(1) | The estimated compensation to be paid by the Fund to the Independent Trustees for one fiscal year for services to the Fund. |
(2) | The total compensation paid to the Independent Trustees for the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 for services to the 169 portfolios, which consisted of 6 open-end mutual funds, 15 closed-end funds and 148 exchange-traded funds. |
Trustee |
Dollar Range of
Equity Securities in the Fund (Number of Shares Held) |
Aggregate Dollar Range of
Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in the First Trust Fund Complex |
Interested Trustee | ||
James A. Bowen | None | Over $100,000 |
Independent Trustees | ||
Richard E. Erickson | None | Over $100,000 |
Thomas R. Kadlec | None | Over $100,000 |
Robert F. Keith | None | Over $100,000 |
Niel B. Nielson | None | Over $100,000 |
• | Mr. Sood has over ten years of experience in derivative based investment strategy design and trading. Mr. Sood joined Cboe Vest in 2012. Prior to joining Cboe Vest Mr. Sood worked at ProShares Advisors LLC. Prior to ProShares, Mr. Sood worked as a Vice President at Barclays Capital. Last based in New York, he was responsible for using derivatives to design structured investment strategies and solutions for the firm’s institutional clients in the Americas. Prior to his role in New York, Mr. Sood worked in similar capacity in London with Barclays Capital’s European clients. Mr. Sood received a master’s degree in Decision Sciences & Operations Research from London School of Economics & Political Science. He also holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. |
• | Mr. Rubin has over twenty years of experience as a portfolio manager. Mr. Rubin joined Cboe Vest in 2017. Prior to joining Cboe Vest, Mr. Rubin served as Director of Portfolio Management at ProShares Advisors LLC from December 2007 to September 2013. Mr. Rubin also served as Senior Portfolio Manager of ProFund Advisors LLC from November 2004 to December 2007 and Portfolio Manager of ProFund Advisors LLC from April 2000 through November 2004. Mr. Rubin holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. Mr. Rubin received a master’s degree in Finance from George Washington University. He also holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Wharton School of Finance, University of Pennsylvania. |
Portfolio Managers |
Registered
Investment Companies Number of Accounts ($ Assets in Thousands) |
Other Pooled
Investment Vehicles Number of Accounts ($ Assets in Thousands) |
Other Accounts
Number of Accounts ($ Assets in Thousands) |
Registered
Investment Companies With Performance Fees Number of Accounts ($ Assets in Thousands) |
Other Pooled
Investment Vehicles With Performance Fees Number of Accounts ($ Assets in Thousands) |
Other Accounts
With Performance Fees Number of Accounts ($ Assets in Thousands) |
Karan Sood | 12 ($1,384,940,009) | 5 ($61,456,071) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Howard Rubin | 12 ($1,384,940,009) | 5 ($61,456,071) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
(1) | Common stocks and other equity securities listed on any national or foreign exchange other than The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq") and the London Stock Exchange Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”) will be valued at the last sale price on the exchange on which they are principally traded, or the official closing price for Nasdaq and AIM securities. Portfolio securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price or official closing price, as applicable, on the Business Day as of which such value is being determined at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities. |
(2) | Shares of open-end funds are valued at fair value which is based on NAV per share. |
(3) | Securities traded in the OTC market are fair valued at the mean of their most recent bid and asked price, if available, and otherwise at their closing bid price. |
(4) | Exchange-traded options and futures contracts are valued at the closing price in the market where such contracts are principally traded. If no closing price is available, they will be fair valued at the mean of their most recent bid and asked price, if available, and otherwise at their closing bid price. OTC options and futures contracts are fair valued at the mean of their most recent bid and asked price, if available, and otherwise at their closing bid price. |
(5) | Forward foreign currency contracts are fair valued at the current day’s interpolated foreign exchange rate, as calculated using the current day’s spot rate, and the 30-, 60-, 90- and 180-day forward rates provided by an independent pricing service or by certain independent dealers in such contracts. |
(1) | Fixed-income securities, convertible securities, interest rate swaps, credit default swaps, total return swaps, currency swaps, currency-linked notes, credit-linked notes and other similar instruments will be fair valued using a pricing service. |
(2) | Fixed-income and other debt securities having a remaining maturity of 60 days or less when purchased are fair valued at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts (amortized cost), provided the Advisor’s Pricing Committee has determined that the use of amortized cost is an appropriate reflection of fair value given market and issuer specific conditions existing at the time of the determination. Factors that may be considered in determining the appropriateness of the use of amortized cost include, but are not limited to, the following: |
(i) | the credit conditions in the relevant market and changes thereto; |
(ii) | the liquidity conditions in the relevant market and changes thereto; |
(iii) | the interest rate conditions in the relevant market and changes thereto (such as significant changes in interest rates); |
(iv) | issuer-specific conditions (such as significant credit deterioration); and |
(v) | any other market-based data the Advisor’s Pricing Committee considers relevant. In this regard, the Advisor’s Pricing Committee may use last-obtained market-based data to assist it when valuing portfolio securities using amortized cost. |
(3) | Repurchase agreements will be valued as follows. Overnight repurchase agreements will be fair valued at cost when it represents the best estimate of fair value. Term repurchase agreements (i.e., those whose maturity exceeds seven days) will be fair valued by the Advisor’s Pricing Committee at the average of the bid quotations obtained daily from at least two recognized dealers. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for director nominees, except under the following circumstances (with new nominees1 considered on case-by-case basis): |
➤ | Independent directors comprise 50 percent or less of the board; |
➤ | The non-independent director serves on the audit, compensation, or nominating committee; |
➤ | The company lacks an audit, compensation, or nominating committee so that the full board functions as that committee; or |
➤ | The company lacks a formal nominating committee, even if the board attests that the independent directors fulfill the functions of such a committee. |
➤ | Medical issues/illness; |
➤ | Family emergencies; and |
➤ | Missing only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer). |
1 | A "new nominee" is a director who is being presented for election by shareholders for the first time. Recommendations on new nominees who have served for less than one year are made on a case-by-case basis depending on the timing of their appointment and the problematic governance issue in question. |
2 | In general, companies with a plurality vote standard use “Withhold” as the contrary vote option in director elections; companies with a majority vote standard use “Against”. However, it will vary by company and the proxy must be checked to determine the valid contrary vote option for the particular company. |
3 | Nominees who served for only part of the fiscal year are generally exempted from the attendance policy. |
➤ | Sit on more than five public company boards; or |
➤ | Are CEOs of public companies who sit on the boards of more than two public companies besides their own— withhold only at their outside boards4. |
➤ | Until Feb. 1, 2021, a firm commitment, as stated in the proxy statement, to appoint at least one woman to the board within a year; |
➤ | The presence of a woman on the board at the preceding annual meeting and a firm commitment to appoint at least one woman to the board within a year; or |
➤ | Other relevant factors as applicable. |
➤ | The board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received the support of a majority of the shares cast in the previous year or failed to act on a management proposal seeking to ratify an existing charter/bylaw provision that received opposition of a majority of the shares cast in the previous year. Factors that will be considered are: |
➤ | Disclosed outreach efforts by the board to shareholders in the wake of the vote; |
➤ | Rationale provided in the proxy statement for the level of implementation; |
➤ | The subject matter of the proposal; |
➤ | The level of support for and opposition to the resolution in past meetings; |
➤ | Actions taken by the board in response to the majority vote and its engagement with shareholders; |
➤ | The continuation of the underlying issue as a voting item on the ballot (as either shareholder or management proposals); and |
➤ | Other factors as appropriate. |
➤ | The board failed to act on takeover offers where the majority of shares are tendered; |
➤ | At the previous board election, any director received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast and the company has failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote. |
➤ | The company’s previous say-on-pay received the support of less than 70 percent of votes cast. Factors that will be considered are: |
➤ | The company's response, including: |
➤ | Disclosure of engagement efforts with major institutional investors, including the frequency and timing of engagements and the company participants (including whether independent directors participated); |
➤ | Disclosure of the specific concerns voiced by dissenting shareholders that led to the say-on-pay opposition; |
➤ | Disclosure of specific and meaningful actions taken to address shareholders' concerns; |
➤ | Other recent compensation actions taken by the company; |
➤ | Whether the issues raised are recurring or isolated; |
4 | Although all of a CEO’s subsidiary boards with publicly-traded common stock will be counted as separate boards, ISS will not recommend a withhold vote for the CEO of a parent company board or any of the controlled (>50 percent ownership) subsidiaries of that parent but may do so at subsidiaries that are less than 50 percent controlled and boards outside the parent/subsidiary relationships. |
➤ | The company's ownership structure; and |
➤ | Whether the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest degree of responsiveness. |
➤ | The board implements an advisory vote on executive compensation on a less frequent basis than the frequency that received the plurality of votes cast. |
➤ | The company has a poison pill that was not approved by shareholders5. However, vote case-by-case on nominees if the board adopts an initial pill with a term of one year or less, depending on the disclosed rationale for the adoption, and other factors as relevant (such as a commitment to put any renewal to a shareholder vote). |
➤ | The board makes a material adverse modification to an existing pill, including, but not limited to, extension, renewal, or lowering the trigger, without shareholder approval. |
➤ | A classified board structure; |
➤ | A supermajority vote requirement; |
➤ | Either a plurality vote standard in uncontested director elections, or a majority vote standard in contested elections; |
➤ | The inability of shareholders to call special meetings; |
➤ | The inability of shareholders to act by written consent; |
➤ | A multi-class capital structure; and/or |
➤ | A non-shareholder-approved poison pill. |
➤ | The board's rationale for adopting the bylaw/charter amendment without shareholder ratification; |
➤ | Disclosure by the company of any significant engagement with shareholders regarding the amendment; |
➤ | The level of impairment of shareholders' rights caused by the board's unilateral amendment to the bylaws/charter; |
➤ | The board's track record with regard to unilateral board action on bylaw/charter amendments or other entrenchment provisions; |
➤ | The company's ownership structure; |
5 | Public shareholders only, approval prior to a company’s becoming public is insufficient. |
➤ | The company's existing governance provisions; |
➤ | The timing of the board's amendment to the bylaws/charter in connection with a significant business development; and, |
➤ | Other factors, as deemed appropriate, that may be relevant to determine the impact of the amendment on shareholders. |
➤ | Classified the board; |
➤ | Adopted supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter; or |
➤ | Eliminated shareholders' ability to amend bylaws. |
➤ | Supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter; |
➤ | A classified board structure; or |
➤ | Other egregious provisions. |
➤ | The presence of a shareholder proposal addressing the same issue on the same ballot; |
➤ | The board's rationale for seeking ratification; |
➤ | Disclosure of actions to be taken by the board should the ratification proposal fail; |
➤ | Disclosure of shareholder engagement regarding the board’s ratification request; |
➤ | The level of impairment to shareholders' rights caused by the existing provision; |
➤ | The history of management and shareholder proposals on the provision at the company’s past meetings; |
➤ | Whether the current provision was adopted in response to the shareholder proposal; |
➤ | The company's ownership structure; and |
➤ | Previous use of ratification proposals to exclude shareholder proposals. |
➤ | The company’s governing documents impose undue restrictions on shareholders’ ability to amend the bylaws. Such restrictions include but are not limited to: outright prohibition on the submission of binding shareholder proposals or share ownership requirements, subject matter restrictions, or time holding requirements in excess of SEC Rule 14a-8. Vote against or withhold on an ongoing basis. |
➤ | The non-audit fees paid to the auditor are excessive; |
➤ | The company receives an adverse opinion on the company’s financial statements from its auditor; or |
➤ | There is persuasive evidence that the Audit Committee entered into an inappropriate indemnification agreement with its auditor that limits the ability of the company, or its shareholders, to pursue legitimate legal recourse against the audit firm. |
➤ | Poor accounting practices are identified that rise to a level of serious concern, such as: fraud; misapplication of GAAP; and material weaknesses identified in Section 404 disclosures. Examine the severity, breadth, chronological sequence, and duration, as well as the company’s efforts at remediation or corrective actions, in determining whether withhold/against votes are warranted. |
➤ | There is an unmitigated misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (pay for performance); |
➤ | The company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or |
➤ | The board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders. |
➤ | The company fails to include a Say on Pay ballot item when required under SEC provisions, or under the company’s declared frequency of say on pay; or |
➤ | The company fails to include a Frequency of Say on Pay ballot item when required under SEC provisions. |
➤ | The presence of an anti-pledging policy, disclosed in the proxy statement, that prohibits future pledging activity; |
➤ | The magnitude of aggregate pledged shares in terms of total common shares outstanding, market value, and trading volume; |
➤ | Disclosure of progress or lack thereof in reducing the magnitude of aggregate pledged shares over time; |
➤ | Disclosure in the proxy statement that shares subject to stock ownership and holding requirements do not include pledged company stock; and |
➤ | Any other relevant factors. |
➤ | Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight7, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company; |
➤ | Failure to replace management as appropriate; or |
➤ | Egregious actions related to a director’s service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company. |
➤ | General Recommendation: In cases where companies are targeted in connection with public “vote-no” campaigns, evaluate director nominees under the existing governance policies for voting on director nominees in uncontested elections. Take into consideration the arguments submitted by shareholders and other publicly available information. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Vote case-by-case on the election of directors in contested elections, considering the following factors: |
➤ | Long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry; |
➤ | Management’s track record; |
➤ | Background to the contested election; |
➤ | Nominee qualifications and any compensatory arrangements; |
➤ | Strategic plan of dissident slate and quality of the critique against management; |
➤ | Likelihood that the proposed goals and objectives can be achieved (both slates); and |
➤ | Stock ownership positions. |
7 | Examples of failure of risk oversight include but are not limited to: bribery; large or serial fines or sanctions from regulatory bodies; significant adverse legal judgments or settlement; or hedging of company stock. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for shareholder proposals requiring that the chair position be filled by an independent director, taking into consideration the following: |
➤ | The scope and rationale of the proposal; |
➤ | The company's current board leadership structure; |
➤ | The company's governance structure and practices; |
➤ | Company performance; and |
➤ | Any other relevant factors that may be applicable. |
➤ | A majority non-independent board and/or the presence of non-independent directors on key board committees; |
➤ | A weak or poorly-defined lead independent director role that fails to serve as an appropriate counterbalance to a combined CEO/chair role; |
➤ | The presence of an executive or non-independent chair in addition to the CEO, a recent recombination of the role of CEO and chair, and/or departure from a structure with an independent chair; |
➤ | Evidence that the board has failed to oversee and address material risks facing the company; |
➤ | A material governance failure, particularly if the board has failed to adequately respond to shareholder concerns or if the board has materially diminished shareholder rights; or |
➤ | Evidence that the board has failed to intervene when management’s interests are contrary to shareholders' interests. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for management and shareholder proposals for proxy access with the following provisions: |
➤ | Ownership threshold: maximum requirement not more than three percent (3%) of the voting power; |
➤ | Ownership duration: maximum requirement not longer than three (3) years of continuous ownership for each member of the nominating group; |
➤ | Aggregation: minimal or no limits on the number of shareholders permitted to form a nominating group; |
➤ | Cap: cap on nominees of generally twenty-five percent (25%) of the board. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote against management proposals to ratify provisions of the company’s existing charter or bylaws, unless these governance provisions align with best practice. |
➤ | The presence of a shareholder proposal addressing the same issue on the same ballot; |
➤ | The board's rationale for seeking ratification; |
➤ | Disclosure of actions to be taken by the board should the ratification proposal fail; |
➤ | Disclosure of shareholder engagement regarding the board’s ratification request; |
➤ | The level of impairment to shareholders' rights caused by the existing provision; |
➤ | The history of management and shareholder proposals on the provision at the company’s past meetings; |
➤ | Whether the current provision was adopted in response to the shareholder proposal; |
➤ | The company's ownership structure; and |
➤ | Previous use of ratification proposals to exclude shareholder proposals. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Vote for proposals to increase the number of authorized common shares where the primary purpose of the increase is to issue shares in connection with a transaction on the same ballot that warrants support. |
➤ | Past Board Performance: |
➤ | The company's use of authorized shares during the last three years |
➤ | The Current Request: |
➤ | Disclosure in the proxy statement of the specific purposes of the proposed increase; |
➤ | Disclosure in the proxy statement of specific and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request; and |
➤ | The dilutive impact of the request as determined relative to an allowable increase calculated by ISS (typically 100 percent of existing authorized shares) that reflects the company's need for shares and total shareholder returns. |
A. | Most companies: 100 percent of existing authorized shares. |
B. | Companies with less than 50 percent of existing authorized shares either outstanding or reserved for issuance: 50 percent of existing authorized shares. |
C. | Companies with one- and three-year total shareholder returns (TSRs) in the bottom 10 percent of the U.S. market as of the end of the calendar quarter that is closest to their most recent fiscal year end: 50 percent of existing authorized shares. |
D. | Companies at which both conditions (B and C) above are both present: 25 percent of existing authorized shares. |
➤ | General Recommendation: For U.S.-incorporated companies, and foreign-incorporated U.S. Domestic Issuers that are traded solely on U.S. exchanges, vote for management proposals to institute open-market share repurchase plans in which all shareholders may participate on equal terms, or to grant the board authority to conduct open-market repurchases, in the absence of company-specific concerns regarding: |
➤ | Greenmail, |
➤ | The use of buybacks to inappropriately manipulate incentive compensation metrics, |
➤ | Threats to the company's long-term viability, or |
➤ | Other company-specific factors as warranted. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote against shareholder proposals prohibiting executives from selling shares of company stock during periods in which the company has announced that it may or will be repurchasing shares of its stock. Vote for the proposal when there is a pattern of abuse by executives exercising options or selling shares during periods of share buybacks. |
➤ | Financial issues – company’s financial situation; degree of need of capital; use of proceeds; effect of the financing on the company’s cost of capital; |
➤ | Management efforts to pursue other alternatives; |
➤ | Control issues – change in management; change in control, guaranteed board and committee seats; standstill provisions; voting agreements; veto power over certain corporate actions; and |
➤ | Conflict of interest – arm’s length transaction, managerial incentives. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Vote case-by-case on mergers and acquisitions. Review and evaluate the merits and drawbacks of the proposed transaction, balancing various and sometimes countervailing factors including: |
➤ | Valuation - Is the value to be received by the target shareholders (or paid by the acquirer) reasonable? While the fairness opinion may provide an initial starting point for assessing valuation reasonableness, emphasis is placed on the offer premium, market reaction, and strategic rationale. |
➤ | Market reaction - How has the market responded to the proposed deal? A negative market reaction should cause closer scrutiny of a deal. |
➤ | Strategic rationale - Does the deal make sense strategically? From where is the value derived? Cost and revenue synergies should not be overly aggressive or optimistic, but reasonably achievable. Management should also have a favorable track record of successful integration of historical acquisitions. |
➤ | Negotiations and process - Were the terms of the transaction negotiated at arm's-length? Was the process fair and equitable? A fair process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders. Significant negotiation "wins" can also signify the deal makers' competency. The comprehensiveness of the sales process (e.g., full auction, partial auction, no auction) can also affect shareholder value. |
➤ | Conflicts of interest - Are insiders benefiting from the transaction disproportionately and inappropriately as compared to non-insider shareholders? As the result of potential conflicts, the directors and officers of the company may be more likely to vote to approve a merger than if they did not hold these interests. Consider whether these interests may have influenced these directors and officers to support or recommend the merger. The CIC figure presented in the "ISS Transaction Summary" section of this report is an aggregate figure that can in certain cases be a misleading indicator of the true value transfer from shareholders to insiders. Where such figure appears to be excessive, analyze the underlying assumptions to determine whether a potential conflict exists. |
➤ | Governance - Will the combined company have a better or worse governance profile than the current governance profiles of the respective parties to the transaction? If the governance profile is to change for the worse, the burden is on the company to prove that other issues (such as valuation) outweigh any deterioration in governance. |
1. | Maintain appropriate pay-for-performance alignment, with emphasis on long-term shareholder value: This principle encompasses overall executive pay practices, which must be designed to attract, retain, and appropriately motivate the key employees who drive shareholder value creation over the long term. It will take into consideration, among other factors, the link between pay and performance; the mix between fixed and variable pay; performance goals; and equity-based plan costs; |
2. | Avoid arrangements that risk “pay for failure”: This principle addresses the appropriateness of long or indefinite contracts, excessive severance packages, and guaranteed compensation; |
3. | Maintain an independent and effective compensation committee: This principle promotes oversight of executive pay programs by directors with appropriate skills, knowledge, experience, and a sound process for compensation decision-making (e.g., including access to independent expertise and advice when needed); |
4. | Provide shareholders with clear, comprehensive compensation disclosures: This principle underscores the importance of informative and timely disclosures that enable shareholders to evaluate executive pay practices fully and fairly; |
5. | Avoid inappropriate pay to non-executive directors: This principle recognizes the interests of shareholders in ensuring that compensation to outside directors is reasonable and does not compromise their independence and ability to make appropriate judgments in overseeing managers’ pay and performance. At the market level, it may incorporate a variety of generally accepted best practices. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Vote case-by-case on ballot items related to executive pay and practices, as well as certain aspects of outside director compensation. |
Vote against Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay or “SOP”) if: |
➤ | There is an unmitigated misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (pay for performance); |
➤ | The company maintains significant problematic pay practices; |
➤ | The board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders. |
➤ | There is no SOP on the ballot, and an against vote on an SOP would otherwise be warranted due to pay-for-performance misalignment, problematic pay practices, or the lack of adequate responsiveness on compensation issues raised previously, or a combination thereof; |
➤ | The board fails to respond adequately to a previous SOP proposal that received less than 70 percent support of votes cast; |
➤ | The company has recently practiced or approved problematic pay practices, such as option repricing or option backdating; or |
➤ | The situation is egregious. |
1. | Peer Group9 Alignment: |
➤ | The degree of alignment between the company's annualized TSR rank and the CEO's annualized total pay rank within a peer group, each measured over a three-year period. |
➤ | The rankings of CEO total pay and company financial performance within a peer group, each measured over a three-year period. |
➤ | The multiple of the CEO's total pay relative to the peer group median in the most recent fiscal year. |
2. | Absolute Alignment10– the absolute alignment between the trend in CEO pay and company TSR over the prior five fiscal years – i.e., the difference between the trend in annual pay changes and the trend in annualized TSR during the period. |
➤ | The ratio of performance- to time-based incentive awards; |
➤ | The overall ratio of performance-based compensation to fixed or discretionary pay; |
➤ | The rigor of performance goals; |
➤ | The complexity and risks around pay program design; |
➤ | The transparency and clarity of disclosure; |
➤ | The company's peer group benchmarking practices; |
➤ | Financial/operational results, both absolute and relative to peers; |
➤ | Special circumstances related to, for example, a new CEO in the prior FY or anomalous equity grant practices (e.g., bi-annual awards); |
8 | The Russell 3000E Index includes approximately 4,000 of the largest U.S. equity securities. |
9 | The revised peer group is generally comprised of 14-24 companies that are selected using market cap, revenue (or assets for certain financial firms), GICS industry group, and company's selected peers' GICS industry group, with size constraints, via a process designed to select peers that are comparable to the subject company in terms of revenue/assets and industry, and also within a market-cap bucket that is reflective of the company's. For Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels companies, market cap is the only size determinant. |
10 | Only Russell 3000 Index companies are subject to the Absolute Alignment analysis. |
➤ | Realizable pay11 compared to grant pay; and |
➤ | Any other factors deemed relevant. |
➤ | Any other factors deemed relevant. |
➤ | Problematic practices related to non-performance-based compensation elements; |
➤ | Incentives that may motivate excessive risk-taking or present a windfall risk; and |
➤ | Pay decisions that circumvent pay-for-performance, such as options backdating or waiving performance requirements. |
➤ | Repricing or replacing of underwater stock options/SARS without prior shareholder approval (including cash buyouts and voluntary surrender of underwater options); |
➤ | Extraordinary perquisites or tax gross-ups; |
➤ | New or materially amended agreements that provide for: |
➤ | Excessive termination or CIC severance payments (generally exceeding 3 times base salary and average/target/most recent bonus); |
➤ | CIC severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties ("single" or "modified single" triggers) or in connection with a problematic Good Reason definition; |
➤ | CIC excise tax gross-up entitlements (including "modified" gross-ups); |
➤ | Multi-year guaranteed awards that are not at risk due to rigorous performance conditions; |
➤ | Liberal CIC definition combined with any single-trigger CIC benefits; |
➤ | Insufficient executive compensation disclosure by externally-managed issuers (EMIs) such that a reasonable assessment of pay programs and practices applicable to the EMI's executives is not possible; |
➤ | Any other provision or practice deemed to be egregious and present a significant risk to investors. |
➤ | Failure to respond to majority-supported shareholder proposals on executive pay topics; or |
➤ | Failure to adequately respond to the company's previous say-on-pay proposal that received the support of less than 70 percent of votes cast, taking into account: |
➤ | Disclosure of engagement efforts with major institutional investors, including the frequency and timing of engagements and the company participants (including whether independent directors participated); |
➤ | Disclosure of the specific concerns voiced by dissenting shareholders that led to the say-on-pay opposition; |
➤ | Disclosure of specific and meaningful actions taken to address shareholders’ concerns; |
➤ | Other recent compensation actions taken by the company; |
11 | ISS research reports include realizable pay for S&P1500 companies. |
➤ | Whether the issues raised are recurring or isolated; |
➤ | The company's ownership structure; and |
➤ | Whether the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest degree of responsiveness. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Vote case-by-case on certain equity-based compensation plans12 depending on a combination of certain plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may counterbalance negative factors, and vice versa, as evaluated using an "Equity Plan Scorecard" (EPSC) approach with three pillars: |
➤ | Plan Cost: The total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers, measured by the company's estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) in relation to peers and considering both: |
➤ | SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and |
➤ | SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants. |
➤ | Plan Features: |
➤ | Quality of disclosure around vesting upon a change in control (CIC); |
➤ | Discretionary vesting authority; |
➤ | Liberal share recycling on various award types; |
➤ | Lack of minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan; |
➤ | Dividends payable prior to award vesting. |
➤ | Grant Practices: |
➤ | The company’s three-year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers; |
➤ | Vesting requirements in CEO's recent equity grants (3-year look-back); |
➤ | The estimated duration of the plan (based on the sum of shares remaining available and the new shares requested, divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years); |
➤ | The proportion of the CEO's most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance conditions; |
➤ | Whether the company maintains a sufficient claw-back policy; |
➤ | Whether the company maintains sufficient post-exercise/vesting share-holding requirements. |
➤ | Awards may vest in connection with a liberal change-of-control definition; |
➤ | The plan would permit repricing or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval (either by expressly permitting it—for NYSE and Nasdaq listed companies—or by not prohibiting it when the company has a history of repricing—for non-listed companies); |
➤ | The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a significant pay-for-performance disconnect under certain circumstances; |
➤ | The plan is excessively dilutive to shareholders' holdings; |
➤ | The plan contains an evergreen (automatic share replenishment) feature; or |
➤ | Any other plan features are determined to have a significant negative impact on shareholder interests. |
21 | Proposals evaluated under the EPSC policy generally include those to approve or amend (1) stock option plans for employees and/or employees and directors, (2) restricted stock plans for employees and/or employees and directors, and (3) omnibus stock incentive plans for employees and/or employees and directors; amended plans will be further evaluated case-by-case. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote case-by-case, examining primarily whether implementation of the proposal is likely to enhance or protect shareholder value. The following factors will be considered: |
➤ | If the issues presented in the proposal are more appropriately or effectively dealt with through legislation or government regulation; |
➤ | If the company has already responded in an appropriate and sufficient manner to the issue(s) raised in the proposal; |
➤ | Whether the proposal's request is unduly burdensome (scope or timeframe) or overly prescriptive; |
➤ | The company's approach compared with any industry standard practices for addressing the issue(s) raised by the proposal; |
➤ | Whether there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company's environmental or social practices; |
➤ | If the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether reasonable and sufficient information is currently available to shareholders from the company or from other publicly available sources; and |
➤ | If the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether implementation would reveal proprietary or confidential information that could place the company at a competitive disadvantage. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for resolutions requesting that a company disclose information on the financial, physical, or regulatory risks it faces related to climate change on its operations and investments or on how the company identifies, measures, and manages such risks, considering: |
➤ | Whether the company already provides current, publicly-available information on the impact that climate change may have on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or opportunities; |
➤ | The company’s level of disclosure compared to industry peers; and |
➤ | Whether there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company’s climate change-related performance. |
➤ | The company already discloses current, publicly-available information on the impacts that GHG emissions may have on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or opportunities; |
➤ | The company's level of disclosure is comparable to that of industry peers; and |
➤ | There are no significant, controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company's GHG emissions. |
➤ | Whether the company provides disclosure of year-over-year GHG emissions performance data; |
➤ | Whether company disclosure lags behind industry peers; |
➤ | The company's actual GHG emissions performance; |
➤ | The company's current GHG emission policies, oversight mechanisms, and related initiatives; and |
➤ | Whether the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines, litigation, or controversy related to GHG emissions. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for requests for reports on a company's efforts to diversify the board, unless: |
➤ | The gender and racial minority representation of the company’s board is reasonably inclusive in relation to companies of similar size and business; and |
➤ | The board already reports on its nominating procedures and gender and racial minority initiatives on the board and within the company. |
➤ | The degree of existing gender and racial minority diversity on the company’s board and among its executive officers; |
➤ | The level of gender and racial minority representation that exists at the company’s industry peers; |
➤ | The company’s established process for addressing gender and racial minority board representation; |
➤ | Whether the proposal includes an overly prescriptive request to amend nominating committee charter language; |
➤ | The independence of the company’s nominating committee; |
➤ | Whether the company uses an outside search firm to identify potential director nominees; and |
➤ | Whether the company has had recent controversies, fines, or litigation regarding equal employment practices. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote case-by-case on requests for reports on a company's pay data by gender, race, or ethnicity, or a report on a company’s policies and goals to reduce any gender, race, or ethnicity pay gap, taking into account: |
➤ | The company's current policies and disclosure related to both its diversity and inclusion policies and practices and its compensation philosophy and fair and equitable compensation practices; |
➤ | Whether the company has been the subject of recent controversy, litigation, or regulatory actions related to gender, race, or ethnicity pay gap issues; and |
➤ | Whether the company's reporting regarding gender, race, or ethnicity pay gap policies or initiatives is lagging its peers. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for proposals requesting that a company report on its policies, initiatives, and oversight mechanisms related to social, economic, and environmental sustainability, unless: |
➤ | The company already discloses similar information through existing reports or policies such as an environment, health, and safety (EHS) report; a comprehensive code of corporate conduct; and/or a diversity report; or |
➤ | The company has formally committed to the implementation of a reporting program based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines or a similar standard within a specified time frame. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Vote case-by-case on proposals requesting information on a company’s lobbying (including direct, indirect, and grassroots lobbying) activities, policies, or procedures, considering: |
➤ | The company’s current disclosure of relevant lobbying policies, and management and board oversight; |
➤ | The company’s disclosure regarding trade associations or other groups that it supports, or is a member of, that engage in lobbying activities; and |
➤ | Recent significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding the company’s lobbying-related activities. |
➤ | General Recommendation: Generally vote for proposals requesting greater disclosure of a company's political contributions and trade association spending policies and activities, considering: |
➤ | The company's policies, and management and board oversight related to its direct political contributions and payments to trade associations or other groups that may be used for political purposes; |
➤ | The company's disclosure regarding its support of, and participation in, trade associations or other groups that may make political contributions; and |
➤ | Recent significant controversies, fines, or litigation related to the company's political contributions or political activities. |
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
Part C – Other Information
Item 28. | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. Description
(2) Amended and Restated Establishment and Designation of Series to be filed by amendment.
(b) | By-Laws of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-210186) filed on March 14, 2016. |
(c) | Not applicable |
(d) | (1) Investment Management Agreement is incorporated by reference to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 filed on Form N-1A (File No. 333-210186) for Registrant on September 26, 2016. |
(2) Amended Schedule A to Investment Management Agreement between Registrant and First Trust Advisors L.P. is filed herewith
(3) Investment Sub-Adviosory Agreement relating to FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs is filed herewith.
(e) | (1) Distribution Agreement is incorporated by reference to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 filed on Form N-1A (File No. 333-210186) for Registrant on September 26, 2016. |
(2) Exhibit A to Distribution Agreement by and between the Registrant and First Trust Portfolios L.P. is filed herewith.
(f) | Not Applicable. |
(2) Schedule I to Custody Agreement between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation is filed herewith.
(2) Amendment to Exhibit A of the Administration and Accounting Agreement is filed herewith.
(4) Amendment to Exhibit A of the Transfer Agency Agreement is filed herewith.
(i) | (1) Opinion and Consent of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP is filed herewith. |
(2) Opinion and Consent of Chapman and Cutler LLP is filed herewith.
(j) | Not Applicable. |
(k) | Not Applicable. |
(l) | Not Applicable. |
(m) | (1) 12b-1 Service Plan is incorporated by reference to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 filed on Form N-1A (File No. 333-210186) for Registrant on September 26, 2016. |
(2) Exhibit A to 12b-1 Service Plan is filed herewith.
(n) | Not Applicable. |
(o) | Not Applicable. |
__________________
Item 29. | Persons Controlled By or Under Common Control with Registrant |
Not Applicable.
Item 30. | Indemnification |
Section 9.5 of the Registrant’s Declaration of Trust provides as follows:
Section 9.5. Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses. Subject to the exceptions and limitations contained in this Section 9.5, every person who is, or has been, a Trustee, officer, or employee of the Trust, including persons who serve at the request of the Trust as directors, trustees, officers, employees or agents of another organization in which the Trust has an interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise (hereinafter referred to as a "Covered Person"), shall be indemnified by the Trust to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability and against all expenses reasonably incurred or paid by him or in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he becomes involved as a party or otherwise by virtue of his being or having been such a Trustee, director, officer, employee or agent and against amounts paid or incurred by him in settlement thereof.
No indemnification shall be provided hereunder to a Covered Person to the extent such indemnification is prohibited by applicable federal law.
The rights of indemnification herein provided may be insured against by policies maintained by the Trust, shall be severable, shall not affect any other rights to which any Covered Person may now or hereafter be entitled, shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be such a Covered Person and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person.
Subject to applicable federal law, expenses of preparation and presentation of a defense to any claim, action, suit or proceeding subject to a claim for indemnification under this Section 9.5 shall be advanced by the Trust prior to final disposition thereof upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the recipient to repay such amount if it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to indemnification under this Section 9.5.
To the extent that any determination is required to be made as to whether a Covered Person engaged in conduct for which indemnification is not provided as described herein, or as to whether there is reason to believe that a Covered Person ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification, the Person or Persons making the determination shall afford the Covered Person a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person has not engaged in such conduct and that there is reason to believe that the Covered Person ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification.
As used in this Section 9.5, the words "claim," "action," "suit" or "proceeding" shall apply to all claims, demands, actions, suits, investigations, regulatory inquiries, proceedings or any other occurrence of a similar nature, whether actual or threatened and whether civil, criminal, administrative or other, including appeals, and the words "liability" and "expenses" shall include without limitation, attorneys' fees, costs, judgments, amounts paid in settlement, fines, penalties and other liabilities.
Item 31. | Business and Other Connections of the Investment Adviser |
First Trust Advisors L.P. (“First Trust”), investment adviser to the Registrant, serves as adviser or sub-adviser to various other open-end and closed-end management investment companies and is the portfolio supervisor of certain unit investment trusts. The principal business of certain of First Trust’s principal executive officers involves various activities in connection with the family of unit investment trusts sponsored by First Trust Portfolios L.P. (“FTP”). The principal address for all these investment companies, First Trust, FTP and the persons below is 120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400, Wheaton, Illinois 60187.
A description of any business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which the officers of First Trust who serve as officers or trustees of the Registrant have engaged during the last two years for his or her account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee appears under “Management of the Fund” in the Statement of Additional Information. Such information for the remaining senior officers of First Trust appears below:
Name and Position with First Trust | Employment During Past Two Years |
Andrew S. Roggensack, President | Managing Director and President, First Trust |
R. Scott Hall, Managing Director | Managing Director, First Trust |
Ronald D. McAlister, Managing Director | Managing Director, First Trust |
David G. McGarel, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Managing Director | Managing Director; Senior Vice President, First Trust |
Kathleen Brown, Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President | Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, First Trust |
Brian Wesbury, Chief Economist and Senior Vice President | Chief Economist and Senior Vice President, First Trust |
Item 32. | Principal Underwriter |
(a) FTP serves as principal underwriter of the shares of the Registrant, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund II, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund IV, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund V, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VI, First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VII, First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDEX® Fund, First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDEX® Fund II, First Trust Variable Insurance Trust and First Trust Series Fund. FTP serves as principal underwriter and depositor of the following investment companies registered as unit investment trusts: the First Trust Combined Series, FT Series (formerly known as the First Trust Special Situations Trust), the First Trust Insured Corporate Trust, the First Trust of Insured Municipal Bonds and the First Trust GNMA.
(b)
(c) Not Applicable.
Item 33. | Location of Accounts and Records |
First Trust, 120 East Liberty Drive, Wheaton, Illinois 60187, maintains the Registrant’s organizational documents, minutes of meetings, contracts of the Registrant and all advisory material of the investment adviser.
Item 34. | Management Services |
Not Applicable.
Item 35. | Undertakings |
Not Applicable.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this Registration Statement under rule 485(b) under the Securities Act and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized, in the City of Wheaton, and State of Illinois, on the 10th day of August, 2020.
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII | ||
By: | /s/ James M. Dykas | |
James M. Dykas, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated:
Signature | Title | Date | |
/s/ James M. Dykas |
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
August 10, 2020 | |
James M. Dykas | |||
/s/ Donald P. Swade |
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Accounting Officer |
August 10, 2020 | |
Donald P. Swade | |||
James A. Bowen* |
)
Trustee ) |
||
) | |||
Richard E. Erickson* |
)
Trustee ) |
||
) | |||
Thomas R. Kadlec* |
)
Trustee ) |
||
) | By: | /s/ W. Scott Jardine | |
Robert F. Keith* |
)
Trustee ) |
W. Scott Jardine
Attorney-In-Fact |
|
) | August 10, 2020 | ||
Niel B. Nielson * |
)
Trustee ) |
||
) |
* | Original powers of attorney authorizing James A. Bowen, W. Scott Jardine, James M. Dykas, Eric F. Fess and Kristi A. Maher to execute Registrant's Registration Statement, and Amendments thereto, for each of the trustees of the Registrant on whose behalf this Registration Statement is filed, were previously executed, filed as an exhibit and are incorporated by reference herein. |
Index to Exhibits
(d)(2) | Amended Schedule A to Investment Management Agreement between Registrant and First Trust Advisors L.P. |
(d)(3) | Investment Sub-Adviosory Agreement relating to FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs. |
(e)(2) | Exhibit A to Distribution Agreement by and between the Registrant and First Trust Portfolios L.P. |
(g)(2) | Schedule I to Custody Agreement between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. |
(h)(2) | Amendment to Exhibit A of the Administration and Accounting Agreement. |
(h)(4) | Amendment to Exhibit A of the Transfer Agency Agreement. |
(i)(1) | Opinion and Consent of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. |
(i)(2) | Opinion and Consent of Chapman and Cutler LLP. |
(m)(2) | Exhibit A to 12b-1 Service Plan. |
Schedule a
(as of August 7, 2020)
Fund
Series | ANNUAL RATE OF AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS | EFFECTIVE DATE |
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 0.20% | 12/19/2018 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 0.85% | 11/1/2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August | 0.85% | 11/1/2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November | 0.85% | 11/1/2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 0.85% | 11/1/2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – February | 0.85% | 02/05/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February | 0.85% | 02/05/2020 |
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF | 0.75% | 04/06/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – May | 0.85% | 05/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.85% | 05/01/2020 |
First Trust Multi Manager Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.85% | 05/15/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – June | 0.85% | 06/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – June | 0.85% | 06/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – July | 0.85% | 07/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July | 0.85% | 07/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – September | 0.85% | 08/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September | 0.85% | 08/01/2020 |
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs | 0.20% | 08/10/2020 |
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
This Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated June 8, 2020 is by and among First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII, a Massachusetts business trust (the “Trust”), First Trust Advisors L.P., an Illinois limited partnership (the “Manager”) and a registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and Cboe Vest Financial LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a registered investment adviser with the SEC (the “Sub-Adviser”).
Whereas, the Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”);
Whereas, the Trust intends to offer shares in the series set forth on Schedule A attached hereto and any other series as to which this Agreement may hereafter be made applicable and set forth on Schedule A, which may be amended from time to time (each such series being herein referred to as a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”);
Whereas, the Trust has retained the Manager to serve as the investment adviser for the Funds pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement between the Manager and the Trust dated December 18, 2018 and effective on behalf of the respective Fund beginning on the applicable date set forth on Schedule A of such agreement (as such agreement may be modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”);
Whereas, the Management Agreement provides that the Manager may, subject to certain requirements, appoint a sub-adviser at its own cost and expense for the purpose of furnishing certain services required under the Management Agreement for the respective Fund;
Whereas, pursuant to the Management Agreement, a Fund will pay to the Manager, at the end of each calendar month, and the Manager agrees to accept as full compensation therefor, an investment management fee equal to an annual rate of such Fund’s average daily net assets as set forth in the Management Agreement with respect to such Fund (the “Investment Management Fee”); and
Whereas, the Trust and the Manager desire to retain the Sub-Adviser to furnish investment advisory services for each Fund’s investment portfolio upon the terms and conditions hereafter set forth;
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Appointment. The Trust and the Manager hereby appoint the Sub-Adviser to serve as Sub-Adviser and to provide certain investment sub-advisory services to each Fund for the period and on the terms set forth in this Agreement and on Schedule A hereto. The Sub-Adviser accepts such appointment and agrees to furnish the services herein set forth for the compensation set forth in this Agreement and on Schedule A hereto. The Sub-Adviser shall, for all purposes herein provided, be deemed an independent contractor and, unless otherwise expressly provided or authorized, shall have no authority to act for nor represent the Trust, any Fund or the Manager in any way, nor otherwise be deemed an agent of the Trust, any Fund or the Manager.
2. Services to Be Performed. (a) Subject always to the supervision of the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board of Trustees” or the “Board”) and the Manager, the Sub-Adviser will act as sub-adviser for, and manage on a discretionary basis the investment and reinvestment of the assets of each Fund allocated to the Sub-Adviser from time to time, furnish an investment program in respect of, make investment decisions for, and place all orders (either directly or through the Manager) for the purchase and sale of securities and other assets for each Fund’s investment portfolio, all on behalf of such Fund and also as described in the Fund’s most current effective registration statement on Form N-1A, or any successor form thereto, and as the same may thereafter be amended from time to time. The Sub-Adviser will be responsible for the investment of only the assets which the Manager allocates to the Sub-Adviser for management under this Agreement, plus all investments, reinvestments and proceeds of the sale thereof, including, without limitation, all interest, dividends and appreciation on investments, less depreciation thereof and withdrawals by the Manager therefrom there being no minimum or maximum percentage of the Fund’s assets to be allocated to the Sub-Adviser from time to time hereunder. In the performance of its duties with regard to the assets allocated to the Sub-Adviser, the Sub-Adviser will (a) satisfy any applicable fiduciary duties it may have to each Fund, (b) monitor each Fund’s investments or other instruments, (c) comply with the provisions of the Trust’s Declaration of Trust and By-laws, as amended from time to time and communicated by a Fund or the Manager to the Sub-Adviser, (d) comply with (i) the respective investment objective(s), policies and restrictions stated in the applicable Fund’s most recently effective prospectus and statement of additional information, (ii) such other investment objectives, policies, restrictions or instructions as the Manager or the Trust’s Board of Trustees may communicate to the Sub-Adviser in writing, and (iii) any changes to the objectives, policies, restrictions or instructions required under the foregoing (i) and (ii) as communicated to the Sub-Adviser in writing and (e) assist in the valuation of portfolio assets held by each Fund as requested by the Manager or the respective Fund. The Sub-Adviser and the Manager will each make its officers and employees available to the other from time to time at reasonable times to review the investment objectives, policies and restrictions of the Funds and to consult with each other regarding the investment affairs of the Funds. Each Fund or the Manager will provide the Sub-Adviser with current copies of the Trust’s Declaration of Trust, the Trust’s By-laws, and any Fund objectives, policies or limitations not appearing in such Fund’s prospectus or statement of additional information as they may be relevant to the Sub-Adviser’s performance under this Agreement. Each Fund’s prospectus, each Fund’s statement of additional information and any amendments thereto are made available on such Fund’s public website.
(b) Unless otherwise agreed to with the Manager or the Board of Trustees, the Sub-Adviser shall have no right or responsibility for voting in respect of securities held in a Fund’s portfolio, it being understood that the Manager shall have such right and responsibility unless reserved by a Fund or another party designated by the Board of Trustees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Sub-Adviser will advise the Manager and/or the Fund and/or other designated party, as applicable, upon request, with respect to proxies and other corporate actions regarding securities or other assets in a Fund in sufficient time to permit the Manager, the Fund or other designated party, as applicable, to take appropriate action with respect to such portfolio investments.
(c) The Manager will select, and enter into agreements with, the brokers, dealers, futures commission merchants, banks or any other other agent or counterparty that will execute the purchases and sales of portfolio investments for the Funds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if and to the extent the Sub-Adviser is specifically authorized and directed by the Manager, the Sub-Adviser may undertake such activities on behalf of one or more Funds. If the Manager specifically authorizes and directs the Sub-Adviser to undertake such activities on behalf of one or more Funds, subject to the specific parameters of the Manager’s authorization and direction, the following provisions of this Section 2(c) will apply solely with respect to such Fund or Funds:
The Sub-Adviser is authorized to select, in consultation with the Manager, and enter into agreements with, the brokers, dealers, futures commission merchants, banks or any other agent or counterparty that will execute the purchases and sales of portfolio investments for the Funds, and is directed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain best execution, which includes most favorable net results and execution of each Fund’s orders, taking into account all appropriate factors, including among other things, price, dealer spread or commission, size and difficulty of the transaction and research or other services provided. Subject to approval by the Board of Trustees and compliance with the policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees for the respective Fund and to the extent permitted by and in conformance with applicable law (including, Rule 17e-1 under the 1940 Act), the Sub-Adviser may select brokers or dealers affiliated with the Sub-Adviser. It is understood that the Sub-Adviser will not be deemed to have acted unlawfully, or to have breached a fiduciary duty to the Trust or the Funds, or be in breach of any obligation owing to the Trust or the Funds under this Agreement, or otherwise, solely by reason of its having caused a Fund to pay a member of a securities exchange, a broker or a dealer a commission for effecting a securities transaction for the Fund in excess of the amount of commission another member of an exchange, broker or dealer would have charged if the Sub-Adviser determined in good faith that the commission paid was reasonable in relation to the brokerage or research services provided by such member, broker or dealer, viewed in terms of that particular transaction or the Sub-Adviser’s overall responsibilities with respect to its accounts, including the Fund, as to which it exercises investment discretion.
In addition, the Sub-Adviser may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, aggregate purchase and sale orders of securities or other instruments placed with respect to the assets of a Fund with similar orders being made simultaneously for other accounts managed by the Sub-Adviser or its affiliates, if in the Sub-Adviser’s reasonable judgment such aggregation shall result in an overall economic benefit to such Fund, taking into consideration the selling or purchase price, brokerage commissions and other expenses. In the event that a purchase or sale of an asset of a Fund occurs as part of any aggregate sale or purchase orders, the objective of the Sub-Adviser and any of its affiliates involved in such transaction shall be to allocate the assets so purchased or sold, as well as expenses incurred in the transaction, among such Fund and other accounts in a fair and equitable manner. Nevertheless, the Funds and the Manager acknowledge that under some circumstances, such allocation may adversely affect a Fund with respect to, among other things, the price or size of the assets obtainable or salable. Whenever a Fund and one or more other investment advisory clients of the Sub-Adviser have available funds for investment, investments suitable and appropriate for each will be allocated in a manner believed by the Sub-Adviser to be equitable to each, although such allocation may result in a delay in one or more client accounts being, or the inability of one or more accounts to be, fully invested that would not occur if such an allocation were not made. Moreover, it is possible that due to differing investment objectives or for other reasons, the Sub-Adviser and its affiliates may purchase securities or other instruments of an issuer for one client and at approximately the same time recommend selling or sell the same or similar types of securities, assets or instruments for another client.
The Sub-Adviser will not arrange purchases or sales of securities or other assets between any Fund and other accounts advised by the Sub-Adviser or its affiliates unless (a) such purchases or sales are in accordance with applicable law (including if applicable Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act) and the Fund’s policies and procedures, (b) the Sub-Adviser determines the purchase or sale is in the best interests of the Fund, and (c) the Board of Trustees has approved these types of transactions.
A Fund may adopt policies and procedures that modify or restrict the Sub-Adviser’s authority regarding the execution of such Fund’s portfolio transactions provided herein. The Manager agrees to notify the Sub-Adviser promptly of any such changes to policies and procedures in writing.
(d) For purposes of complying with Rule 10f-3, Rule 12d3-1, Rule 17a-10 and Rule 17e-1 under the 1940 Act, the Sub-Adviser hereby agrees that it will not consult with any other sub-adviser of an investment company or a series of an investment company that is advised by the Manager (the “First Trust Fund Complex”) or an affiliated person of a sub-adviser (including any sub-adviser that is a principal underwriter or an affiliated person of such principal underwriter), concerning transactions for the Fund or any fund in the First Trust Fund Complex in securities or other fund assets. In addition, with respect to a fund in the First Trust Fund Complex with multiple sub-advisers, the Sub-Adviser shall be limited to providing investment advice with respect to only the discrete portion of a fund’s portfolio as may be determined from time-to-time by the Board of Trustees or the Manager, and shall not consult with the sub-adviser (including any sub-adviser that is a principal underwriter or an affiliated person of such principal underwriter) as to any other portion of a fund’s portfolio concerning transactions for a fund in securities or other assets. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions in this paragraph do not apply to the consultations between the Sub-Adviser and any sub-adviser retained by the Sub-Adviser pursuant to Section 4 hereof.
(e) The Sub-Adviser will communicate to the officers and Trustees of the Trust such information relating to transactions for the Fund, as they may reasonably request. In no instance will any Fund’s portfolio assets be purchased from or sold to the Manager, the Sub-Adviser or any affiliated person of either the Trust, the Manager, or the Sub-Adviser, except as may be permitted under the 1940 Act, and under no circumstances will the Sub-Adviser select brokers or dealers for Fund transactions on the basis of Fund share sales by such brokers or dealers.
(f) The Sub-Adviser further agrees that it:
(i) will use the same degree of skill and care in providing such services as it uses in providing services to other fiduciary accounts for which it has investment responsibilities;
(ii) will (A) conform in all material respects to all applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and any other applicable regulatory authority, (B) comply in all material respects with all policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees for the Funds and communicated to the Sub-Adviser in writing, and (C) conduct its activities under this Agreement in all material respects in accordance with any applicable law and regulations of any governmental authority pertaining to its investment advisory activities and commodity trading advisory activities;
(iii) will report to the Manager and to the Board of Trustees on a quarterly basis and will make appropriate persons available for the purpose of reviewing with representatives of the Manager and the Board of Trustees on a regular basis at such times as the Manager or the Board of Trustees may reasonably request in writing regarding the management of the Funds, including, without limitation, review of the general investment strategies of the Funds, the performance of the Funds’ investment portfolios in relation to relevant standard industry indices and general conditions affecting the marketplace and will provide various other reports from time to time as reasonably requested by the Manager or the Board of Trustees;
(iv) will prepare and maintain such books and records with respect to its services under this Agreement, including records of all recommendations for each Fund’s investment portfolio made during its performance of services pursuant to this Agreement, and all such other records as required under applicable law, the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures or as otherwise requested by the Manager or the Board of Trustees and will prepare and furnish the Manager and the Board of Trustees such periodic and special reports as the Board or the Manager may request. Such records shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by the Manager or the Funds and any appropriate regulatory authorities. The Sub-Adviser further agrees that all records that it maintains for a Fund are the property of the respective Fund and the Sub-Adviser will surrender promptly to such Fund any such records upon the request of the Manager or such Fund (provided, however, that the Sub-Adviser shall be permitted to retain copies thereof); and shall be permitted to retain originals (with copies to the relevant Fund) to the extent required under Rule 204-2 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or other applicable law; and
(v) will monitor the pricing of portfolio assets, and events relating to the issuers of those assets and the markets in which the securities or other assets trade in the ordinary course of managing the portfolio investments of the Funds, and will notify the Manager promptly of any issuer-specific or market events or other situations that occur (particularly those that may occur after the close of a foreign market in which the investments may primarily trade but before the time at which the respective Fund’s investments are priced on a given day) that may materially impact the pricing of one or more securities or other assets in the Fund’s portfolio. In addition, the Sub-Adviser will at the Manager’s request assist the Manager in evaluating the impact that such an event may have on the net asset value of the Fund and in determining a recommended fair value of the affected investment or investments.
3. Expenses. During the term of this Agreement, the Sub-Adviser will pay one-half of all expenses of each Fund (including the cost of transfer agency, custody, fund administration, legal, audit and other services and license fees, if any) but excluding the fee payment under this Agreement, the Investment Management Fee, interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees, if any, and expenses and other expenses connected with the execution of portfolio transactions (such as dividend and distribution expenses from securities sold short and/or other investment related costs), distribution and service fees payable pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 plan, if any, and extraordinary expenses (collectively, the “Fund Expenses”) in the manner set forth in Section 5 below. In addition, during the term of this Agreement, the Sub-Adviser will pay all expenses incurred by it in connection with its activities under this Agreement, other than the cost of securities and other assets (including brokerage commissions, if any, and other expenses connected with the execution of portfolio transactions) purchased for the Funds. Each Fund shall be responsible for payment of brokerage commissions, transfer fees, registration costs, transaction-related taxes and transaction-related expenses and fees arising out of transactions effected on behalf of the Fund. Further, the Sub-Adviser agrees to bear its costs and expenses arising in connection with any actual, proposed, or possible assignment of this Agreement (even if a proposed, expected or possible assignment ultimately does not take place). For the avoidance of doubt, without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, if there is a termination (or possible or anticipated termination) of this Agreement as a result of an assignment (or possible or anticipated assignment), then the Sub-Adviser shall bear, without limitation, (a) the expenses and costs incurred in connection with preparing, printing, filing and mailing an information statement or proxy statement, as applicable and (b) if relevant, solicitation and other costs associated with the use of a proxy statement.
4. Additional Sub-Advisers. Subject to obtaining the initial and periodic approvals required under Section 15 of the 1940 Act (after taking into account any exemptive order, no-action assurances or other relief, rule or regulation upon which the respective Fund may rely) and the approval of the Manager, the Sub-Adviser may retain one or more additional sub-advisers at the Sub-Adviser’s own cost and expense for the purpose of furnishing one or more of the services described in Section 2 hereof with respect to a Fund. Retention of a sub-adviser hereunder shall in no way reduce the responsibilities or obligations of the Sub-Adviser under this Agreement and the Sub-Adviser shall be responsible to the Funds for all acts or omissions of any sub-adviser in connection with the performance of the Sub-Adviser’s duties hereunder.
5. Compensation. For the services provided and the expenses assumed pursuant to this Agreement, the Manager will pay the Sub-Adviser, and the Sub-Adviser agrees to accept as full compensation therefor, a sub-advisory fee (the “Sub-Advisory Fee”) for each respective Fund equal to the percentage set forth in Schedule A of the Investment Management Fee for such Fund; provided, however, such Sub-Advisory Fee payment shall be reduced by the amount of Fund Expenses owed by the Sub-Adviser pursuant to Section 3 above. The Sub-Advisory Fee net of Fund Expenses shall be payable monthly in arrears. If the Fund Expenses owed by the Sub-Adviser are greater than the Sub-Advisory Fee, the Sub-Adviser shall pay Manager the difference by the date the Sub-Advisory Fee would have been due. For the month and year in which this Agreement becomes effective or terminates, there shall be an appropriate proration on the basis of the number of days that the Agreement is in effect during the month and year, respectively. At the request of the Sub-Adviser, the Manager shall provide the Sub-Adviser with an accounting reasonably satisfactory to the Sub-Adviser of the calculation of the Sub-Advisory Fee. The Manager shall provide prompt advance notice to the Sub-Adviser of any change to the Manager’s compensation agreements with respect to the Fund, which change may require approval by the Board of Trustees.
6. Services to Others. The Trust and the Manager acknowledge that the Sub-Adviser’s services under this Agreement are not exclusive. Sub-Adviser now acts, or may in the future act, as an investment adviser to other managed accounts and as investment adviser or investment sub-adviser to one or more other investment companies that are not series of the Trust and may be similar to the Trust. In addition, the Trust and the Manager acknowledge that the directors, officers, stockholders, affiliates or persons employed by the Sub-Adviser to assist in the Sub-Adviser’s duties under this Agreement will not devote their full time to such efforts. It is also agreed that the Sub-Adviser may use any supplemental research obtained for the benefit of a Fund in providing investment advice to its other investment advisory accounts and for managing its own accounts.
7. Limitation of Liability. The Sub-Adviser shall not be liable for, and the Trust and the Manager will not take any action against the Sub-Adviser to hold the Sub-Adviser liable for, any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by any Fund or the Manager (including, without limitation, by reason of the purchase, sale or retention of any security or other asset) in connection with the performance of the Sub-Adviser’s duties under this Agreement, except for a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the Sub-Adviser in the performance of its duties under this Agreement, or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
8. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall become effective for each Fund on the date set forth in Schedule A for such Fund, provided that it has been approved in the manner required by the 1940 Act (after taking into effect any exemptive order, no-action assurances, or other relief, rule or regulation upon which any Fund may rely), and shall remain in full force until the two-year anniversary of the date of its effectiveness with respect to such Fund unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided. This Agreement shall continue in force from year to year thereafter, but only as long as such continuance is specifically approved for the respective Fund at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder (after taking into effect any exemptive order, no-action assurances, or other relief, rule or regulation upon which any Fund may rely); provided, however, that if the continuation of this Agreement is not approved for a Fund, the Sub-Adviser may continue to serve in such capacity for such Fund in the manner and to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of its assignment and may be terminated at any time without the payment of any penalty by the Manager or the Sub-Adviser upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to the other parties. This Agreement may also be terminated with respect to a Fund by such Fund by action of the Board of Trustees or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Fund upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to such Sub-Adviser by the Fund without payment of any penalty; for clarity, termination of this Agreement by one Fund will not terminate this Agreement for the other Funds.
This Agreement may be terminated at any time with respect to a Fund without the payment of any penalty by the Manager, the Board of Trustees or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund in the event that it shall have been established by a court of competent jurisdiction that the Sub-Adviser or any officer or director of the Sub-Adviser has taken any action that results in a breach of the material covenants of the Sub-Adviser set forth herein.
For clarity, termination of this Agreement with respect to one Fund will not automatically terminate this Agreement for the other Funds. The terms “assignment” and “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” shall have the meanings set forth in the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder subject to such exemptions as may be granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under that Act. This Agreement shall automatically terminate for a Fund in the event the Management Agreement between the Manager and the Trust on behalf of such Fund is terminated, assigned or not renewed.
Termination of this Agreement shall not affect the right of the Sub-Adviser to receive payments on any unpaid balance of the compensation described in Section 5 or the obligation of the Sub-Adviser to pay its share of Fund Expenses as described in Sections 3 and 5, earned or accrued prior to such termination and for any additional period during which the Sub-Adviser serves as such for the respective Fund, subject to applicable law.
9. Compliance Certification. From time to time the Sub-Adviser shall provide such certifications with respect to Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act as are reasonably requested by a Fund or the Manager. In addition, the Sub-Adviser will, from time to time, provide a written assessment of its compliance program in conformity with current industry standards that is reasonably acceptable to the respective Fund to enable such Fund to fulfill its obligations under Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act.
10. Confidentiality. The Sub-Adviser shall treat as confidential and use only in connection with the Funds in accordance with this Agreement all non-public information of the any Fund and the Manager delivered to the Sub-Adviser in the course of the Sub-Adviser’s performances under this Agreement. The Manager and the Funds shall treat as confidential and use only in connection with the Funds in accordance with this Agreement all non-public information of the Sub-Adviser delivered to a Fund or the Manager in the course of the Sub-Adviser’s performances under this Agreement, including for avoidance of doubt investment decisions, trading strategies, and investment advice for a Fund provided by or on behalf of the Sub-Adviser or any other sub-advisers appointed by the Sub-Adviser under Section 4 (“Recommendations”). The undertakings in the first two sentences of this paragraph shall not (a) limit disclosures that are required to be made under applicable laws and regulations; (b) apply to information that becomes public without a breach of this paragraph; or (c) prohibit disclosures on a confidential basis to lawyers, accountants, bankers, securities brokers, other sub-advisers appointed by the Sub-Adviser under Section 4, or other service providers to any of the parties to this Agreement related to the performances contemplated by this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that any breach of the undertakings in the first two sentences of this paragraph might result in immediate, irreparable injury to another party and that, accordingly, equitable remedies, including ex parte remedies, are appropriate in the event of any actual, apparent, or threatened breach of any such undertaking. The undertakings in this paragraph shall apply to derivative works.
The Fund and the Manager shall not use, or permit any of their affiliates to use, any Recommendations for any purpose other than the management of the Funds.
11. Use of Name and Trademarks. The Sub-Adviser permits the Manager and the Trust at no cost to use (a) the name “Cboe Vest” in the names of the Funds; and (b) the registered trademarks “TARGET OUTCOME INVESTMENTS”, “TARGET OUTCOME FUNDS”, and “TARGET OUTCOME ETF” in connection with the Funds, for the duration of this Agreement and any extensions or renewals thereof. Such permission will, upon termination of this Agreement, be automatically and without further action by the Sub-Adviser terminated, in which event the Funds shall promptly take whatever action may be necessary (including calling a meeting of the Board of Trustees) to change its name and to discontinue any further use of the name “Cboe Vest” in the names of the Funds or otherwise and to discontinue any further use of the registered trademarks listed in clause (b) above.
12. Notice. Any notice under this Agreement shall be sufficient in all respects if given in writing and delivered by commercial courier providing proof of delivery and addressed as follows or addressed to such other person or address as such party may designate for receipt of such notice.
13. Limitations on Liability. All parties hereto are expressly put on notice of the Trust’s Declaration of Trust and all amendments thereto, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the limitation of shareholder and trustee liability contained therein and a copy of which has been provided to the Sub-Adviser prior to the date hereof. This Agreement is executed by the Trust on behalf of each Fund by the Trust’s officers in their capacity as officers and not individually and is not binding upon any of the Trustees, officers or shareholders of the Trust individually but the obligations imposed upon the Trust or a Fund by this Agreement are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective Fund, and persons dealing with the Trust or a Fund must look solely to the assets of such Fund for the enforcement of any claims.
14. Miscellaneous. The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience of reference only and in no way define or delimit any of the provisions hereof or otherwise affect their construction or effect. This Agreement will be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors.
15. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with applicable federal law and (except as to Section 13 hereof, which shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts) the laws of the State of Illinois. For the avoidance of doubt, where the effect of a requirement of the 1940 Act reflected in any provision of this Agreement is relaxed by a rule, regulation, no action assurance, order (including amendment thereto) or other relief of the SEC, whether of special or general application, such provision shall be deemed to incorporate the effect of such rule, regulation, no-action assurance, order (including any amendment thereto) or other relief.
16. Amendment; Etc. This Agreement may only be amended, or its provisions modified or waived, in a writing signed by the party against which such amendment, modification or waiver is sought to be enforced.
17. Authority. Each party represents to the others that it is duly authorized and fully empowered to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement. The Trust represents that engagement of the Sub-Adviser has been duly authorized by the Trust and is in accordance with the Trust’s Declaration of Trust and other governing documents of the Fund.
18. Third Party Beneficiaries. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be for the benefit of, or enforceable by, any person or entity that is not a party hereto.
19. Forum Selection. Any action brought on or with respect to this Agreement or any other document executed in connection herewith or therewith by a party to this Agreement against another party to this Agreement shall be brought only in a court of competent jurisdiction in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, or if venue does not lie in any such court only in a court of competent jurisdiction within the State of Illinois (the “Chosen Courts”). Each party to this Agreement (a) consents to jurisdiction in the Chosen Courts; (b) waives any objection to venue in any of the Chosen Courts; and (c) waives any objection that any of the Chosen Courts is an inconvenient forum. In any action commenced by a party hereto against another party to the Agreement, there shall be no right to a jury trial. THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IS EXPRESSLY WAIVED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW.
20. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable from the others so that if any provision or term hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions and terms hereof; provided, however, that the provisions governing payment of the Sub-Advisory Fee described in Section 5 and the obligation of the Sub-Adviser to pay its share of Fund Expenses as described in Sections 3 and 5 are not severable.
21. Entire Agreement; Counterparts. This Agreement constitutes the sole and entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter expressly set forth herein. This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instrument.
In Witness Whereof, the Trust on behalf of the Fund, the Manager and the Sub-Adviser have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.
First Trust Advisors L.P. First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII, on behalf of the series listed on Schedule A
By /s/ James M. Dykas_________________ ___ By /s/ Donald P. Swade___________
Title: Chief Financial Officer_______________ Title: Treasurer and CFO_______
Cboe Vest Financial LLC
By /s/ Karan Sood_____________________
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Schedule A
as of August 7, 2020
Funds | Percentage of Investment Management Fee | Effective Date |
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs | 50% | August 10, 2020 |
Exhibit A
Series of the Trust
Series | Effective Date |
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | September 28, 2016 |
First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF | September 28, 2016 |
First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF | February 13, 2017 |
EquityCompass Risk Manager ETF | January 19, 2017 |
EquityCompass Tactical Risk Manager ETF | January 19, 2017 |
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF | May 29, 2018 |
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | December 18, 2018 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – August | November 1, 2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – August | November 1, 2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – November | November 1, 2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – November | November 1, 2019 |
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | November 24, 2019 |
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | November 24, 2019 |
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | November 24, 2019 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – February | February 5, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – February | February 5, 2020 |
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF | April 6, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – May | May 1, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – May | May 1, 2020 |
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | May 15, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – June | June 1, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – June | June 1, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – July | July 1, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – July | July 1, 2020 |
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs | August 10, 2020 |
SCHEDULE I
Funds of the Trust
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF
First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
EquityCompass Risk Manager ETF
EquityCompass Tactical Risk Manager ETF
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – August
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – August
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – November
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – November
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – February
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – February
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – May
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – June
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – June
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – July
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – July
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs
Exhibit A
(as of August 7, 2020)
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF
First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
EquityCompass Risk Manager ETF
EquityCompass Tactical Risk Manager ETF
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – August
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – August
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – November
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – November
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – February
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – February
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – May
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – May
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – June
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – June
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – July
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – July
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs
Exhibit A
Funds of First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF
First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
EquityCompass Equity Risk Manager ETF
EquityCompass Tactical Equity Risk Manager ETF
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – August
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – August
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – November
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – November
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – February
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – February
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – May
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – May
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – June
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – June
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – July
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – July
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs
|
August 7, 2020
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
120 E. Liberty Street
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
Chapman and Cutler LLP
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Re: First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special Massachusetts counsel to First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII (the "Trust") on behalf of its series FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (the "Fund") in connection with the Trust's Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement on Form N-1A to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about August 7, 2020 (as so amended, the "Registration Statement") with respect to the Fund’s shares of beneficial interest, par value $.01 per share (the "Shares"). You have requested that we deliver this opinion to you in connection with the Trust's filing of such Registration Statement.
In connection with the furnishing of this opinion, we have examined the following documents:
(a) a certificate of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as to the existence of the Trust;
(b) a copy, as filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 16, 2017, of the Trust's Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated as of June 12, 2017 (the "Declaration");
(c) a copy, as filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 13, 2020, of the Trust's Amended and Restated Establishment and Designation of Series of Shares of Beneficial Interest, effective as of May 12, 2020, and the written consent of the Trustees of the Trust dated August 7, 2020 changing the name of the Fund (collectively, the "Designation");
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius llp | |||
One Federal Street |
|||
Boston, MA 02110-1726 |
T +1.617.341.7700 |
||
United States |
F +1.617.341.7701 |
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
Chapman and Cutler LLP
August 7, 2020
Page 2
(d) a certificate executed by an Assistant Secretary of the Trust, certifying as to the Trust's Declaration, Designation, By-Laws, and certain resolutions adopted by Trust’s Trustees at a meeting held on June 8, 2020 and the written consent of the Trustees dated August 7, 2020 (the "Resolutions"); and
(e) a draft of the Registration Statement received on August 7, 2020.
In such examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the conformity to the originals of all of the documents reviewed by us as copies, the authenticity and completeness of all original documents reviewed by us in original or copy form and the legal competence of each individual executing any document. We have also assumed that the Registration Statement, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, will be in substantially the form of filing referred to in paragraph (e) above. We have further assumed that the Trust’s Declaration, Designation, By-Laws and the Resolutions will not have been amended, modified or withdrawn with respect to matters relating to the Shares and will be in full force and effect on the date of the issuance of such Shares.
This opinion is based entirely on our review of the documents listed above and such investigation of law as we have deemed necessary or appropriate. We have made no other review or investigation of any kind whatsoever, and we have assumed, without independent inquiry, the accuracy of the information set forth in such documents.
As to any opinion below relating to the existence of the Trust under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, our opinion relies entirely upon and is limited by the certificate of public officials referred to in (a) above.
This opinion is limited solely to the internal substantive laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, as applied by courts located in Massachusetts (other than Massachusetts securities laws, as to which we express no opinion), to the extent that the same may apply to or govern the transactions referred to herein. No opinion is given herein as to the choice of law which any tribunal may apply to such transaction. In addition, to the extent that the Trust’s Declaration, Designation or By-Laws refer to, incorporate or require compliance with the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or any other law or regulation applicable to the Trust, except for the internal substantive laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, as aforesaid, we have assumed compliance by the Trust with such Act and such other laws and regulations.
We understand that all of the foregoing assumptions and limitations are acceptable to you.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, please be advised that it is our opinion that:
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
Chapman and Cutler LLP
August 7, 2020
Page 3
1. The Trust is existing under the Trust's Declaration of Trust and the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as a voluntary association with transferable shares of beneficial interest commonly referred to as a "Massachusetts business trust."
2. The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the Resolutions and for the consideration described in the Registration Statement, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, except that, as set forth in the Registration Statement, shareholders of the Trust may under certain circumstances be held personally liable for its obligations.
This opinion is given as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update this opinion to reflect any changes in law or any other facts or circumstances which may hereafter come to our attention. We hereby consent to your reliance on this opinion in connection with your opinion to the Trust with respect to the Shares and to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. In rendering this opinion and giving this consent, we do not concede that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Very truly yours,
/s/ MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
|
111 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603-4080
T 312.845.3000 F 312.701.2361 www.chapman.com |
August 7, 2020
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
Re: |
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII |
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have served as counsel for the First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII (the “Trust”), which proposes to offer and sell shares of its series (the “Shares”), FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (the “Fund”), in the manner and on the terms set forth in Post-Effective Amendment No. 176 and Amendment No. 178 to its Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on or about August 7, 2020 (the “Amendment”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, respectively.
In connection therewith, we have examined such pertinent records and documents and matters of law, including the opinion of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP issued to the Trust or Trust’s counsel upon which we have relied as they relate to the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, as we have deemed necessary in order to enable us to express the opinion hereinafter set forth.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:
The Shares of the Fund may be issued from time to time in accordance with the Trust’s Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated June 12, 2017 and the Trust’s By-Laws, and subject to compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and applicable state laws regulating the sale of securities and the receipt by the Fund of the purchase price of not less than the net asset value per Share, and such Shares, when so issued and sold by the Fund, will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable, except that, as set forth in the Amendment, shareholders of the Fund may under certain circumstances be held personally liable for its obligations.
August 7, 2020
Page 2
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-210186) relating to the Shares referred to above, to the use of our name and to the reference to our firm in said Registration Statement.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Chapman and Cutler LLP
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Exhibit A
Funds | Dates | |
First Trust Exchange Traded Fund VIII | ||
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
EquityCompass Risk Manager ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
EquityCompass Tactical Risk Manager ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 12/31/2020 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – August | 11/1/2021 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – August | 11/1/2021 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – November | 11/1/2021 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – November | 11/1/2021 | |
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 11/24/2021 | |
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 11/24/2021 | |
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 11/24/2021 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – February | 02/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – February | 02/01/2022 | |
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF | 04/06/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – May | 05/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – May | 05/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – June | 06/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – June | 06/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – July | 07/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF – July | 07/01/2022 | |
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs | 08/07/2022 | |