RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our common stock involves a number of very significant risks. You should carefully consider the following known material risks and uncertainties in addition to other information in this prospectus in evaluating our company and its business before purchasing shares of our company’s common stock. You could lose all or part of your investment due to any of these risks.

 

RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMPANY

 

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Our financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2013 were prepared assuming that we will continue our operations as a going concern. We were incorporated on September 14, 2009 and do not have a history of earnings. As a result, our independent accountants in their audit report have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Continued operations are dependent on our ability to complete equity or debt financings or generate profitable operations. Such financings may not be available or may not be available on reasonable terms. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

This prospectus relates to shares of our common stock that may be offered and sold from time to time by the selling stockholders. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the common shares being offered for sale by the selling security holders.

 

DETERMINATION OF THE OFFERING PRICE

 

The selling shareholders will sell our shares at $0.10 per share until our shares are quoted on the OTCBB, and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices. This price was arbitrarily determined by us.

SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

 

The following table sets forth the shares beneficially owned, as of May 13, 2013, by the selling security holders prior to the offering by existing shareholders contemplated by this prospectus, the number of shares each selling security holder is offering by this prospectus and the number of shares which each would own beneficially if all such offered shares are sold.

 

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

 

Each of the selling security holders acquired their shares of common stock being resold hereunder directly from the Company for a purchase price of $0.025 per share. The percentages below are calculated based on 6,850,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this prospectus. We do not have any outstanding options, warrants or other securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of our common stock.

 

 

11

---

 

Name of Selling Shareholder		Purchase Price per Share, as Purchased from the Company			Shares Owned Before the Offering				Total Number of Shares to be Offered for the Security Holder’s Account				Total Shares Owned After the Offering is Complete				Percentage of Shares owned After the Offering is Complete
Dan Hoffman		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Tane Taylor		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Sam Young		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Kevin Turner		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Ingred Vernoon		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
John Woods		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
John Visser		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Bill Wolfe		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Mike Olson		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Art Deel		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Ivan Catterill		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Fred White		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Mary Wilson		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Helen Truner		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Tom Peel		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Ken Hay		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Bruce Wood		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Chris Hammer		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Ian Meek		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Ken Ulrich		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
John Oliver		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Karen Lein		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Terry Muir		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Tim Gambrill		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Brad Baggott		$0.01				50,000				50,000				0				0
Kathy Fuller		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Jim Kelly		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
John Andrews		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Collin Duncan		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Karen Wilson		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Ed Thomas		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Steve Little		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Sharon Wilson		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
George Williams		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
Allan Upland		$0.05				40,000				40,000				0				0
John Chase		$0.10				50,000				50,000				0				0
Tim Brown		$0.10				50,000				50,000				0				0
Nance Nunn		$0.10				50,000				50,000				0				0
Colin Harper		$0.10				50,000				50,000				0				0
Totals						1,850,000				1,850,000				0				0

 

 

12

---

 

 

None of the selling shareholders has a relationship with us other than as a shareholder, has ever been one of our officers or directors, or is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or an affiliate of such a broker-dealer.

 

We may require the selling stockholders to suspend the sales of the securities offered by this prospectus upon the occurrence of any event that makes any statement in this prospectus, or the related registration statement, untrue in any material respect, or that requires the changing of the statements in these documents in order to make statements in those documents not misleading. We will file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement to reflect any such material changes to this prospectus.

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

 

GENERAL

 

There is no established public trading market for our common stock. Our authorized capital stock consists of 75,000,000 shares of common stock, with $0.001 par value per share. As of May 13, 2013, there were 6,850,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding that were held by 41 stockholders of record, and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

 

COMMON STOCK

 

The following is a summary of the material rights and restrictions associated with our common stock. This description does not purport to be a complete description of all of the rights of our stockholders and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the provisions of our most current Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, which are included as exhibits to this Registration Statement.

 

The holders of our common stock currently have (i) equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available therefore, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Company; (ii) are entitled to share ratably in all of the assets of the Company available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company

 

(iii) do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights applicable thereto; and (iv) are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which stock holders may vote.

 

Our Bylaws provide that at all meetings of the stockholders for the election of directors, a plurality of the votes cast shall be sufficient to elect. On all other matters, except as otherwise required by Nevada law or the Articles of Incorporation, a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the stockholders shall be necessary to authorize any corporate action to be taken by vote of the stockholders. A “plurality” means the excess of the votes cast for one candidate over any other. When there are more than two competitors for the same office, the person who receives the greatest number of votes has a plurality.

 

We do not have any preferred stock authorized in our Articles of Incorporation, and we have no warrants, options or other convertible securities issued or outstanding.

 

 

13

---

 

 

NEVADA ANTI-TAKEOVER LAWS

 

The Nevada Business Corporation Law contains a provision governing “Acquisition of Controlling Interest.” This law provides generally that any person or entity that acquires 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of a publicly-held Nevada corporation in the secondary public or private market may be denied voting rights with respect to the acquired shares, unless a majority of the disinterested stockholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights in whole or in part. The control share acquisition act provides that a person or entity acquires “control shares” whenever it acquires shares that, but for the operation of the control share acquisition act, would bring its voting power within any of the following three ranges: (1) 20 to 33 1/3%, (2) 33 1/3 to 50%, or (3) more than 50%. A “control share acquisition” is generally defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of either ownership or voting power associated with issued and outstanding control shares. The stockholders or board of directors of a corporation may elect to exempt the stock of the corporation from the provisions of the control share acquisition act through adoption of a provision to that effect in the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the corporation. Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws do not exempt our common stock from the control share acquisition act. The control share acquisition act is applicable only to shares of “Issuing Corporations” as defined by the act. An Issuing Corporation is a Nevada corporation, which; (1) has 200 or more stockholders, with at least 100 of such stockholders being both stockholders of record and residents of Nevada; and (2) does business in Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation.

 

At this time, we do not have 100 stockholders of record resident of Nevada. Therefore, the provisions of the control share acquisition act do not apply to acquisitions of our shares and will not until such time as these requirements have been met. At such time as they may apply to us, the provisions of the control share acquisition act may discourage companies or persons interested in acquiring a significant interest in or control of the Company, regardless of whether such acquisition may be in the interest of our stockholders.

 

The Nevada “Combination with Interested Stockholders Statute” may also have an effect of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of the Company. This statute prevents an “interested stockholder” and a resident domestic Nevada corporation from entering into a “combination,” unless certain conditions are met. The statute defines “combination” to include any merger or consolidation with an “interested stockholder,” or any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition, in one transaction or a series of transactions with an “interested stockholder” having; (1) an aggregate market value equal to 5 percent or more of the aggregate market value of the assets of the corporation; (2) an aggregate market value equal to 5 percent or more of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the corporation; or (3) representing 10 percent or more of the earning power or net income of the corporation. An “interested stockholder” means the beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of the voting shares of a resident domestic corporation, or an affiliate or associate thereof. A corporation affected by the statute may not engage in a “combination” within three years after the interested stockholder acquires its shares unless the combination or purchase is approved by the board of directors before the interested stockholder acquired such shares. If approval is not obtained, then after the expiration of the three-year period, the business combination may be consummated with the approval of the board of directors or a majority of the voting power held by disinterested stockholders, or if the consideration to be paid by the interested stockholder is at least equal to the highest of: (1) the highest price per share paid by the interested stockholder within the three years immediately preceding the date of the announcement of the combination or in the transaction in which he became an interested stockholder, whichever is higher; (2) the market value per common share on the date of announcement of the combination or the date the interested stockholder acquired the shares, whichever is higher; or (3) if higher for the holders of preferred stock, the highest liquidation value of the preferred stock. The effect of Nevada’s business combination law is to potentially discourage parties interested in taking control of the Company from doing so if they cannot obtain the approval of our board of directors.

 

RULE 144

 

All 6,850,000 shares of our issued and outstanding shares of our common stock are “restricted securities” under Rule 144, promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, but none of those 6,850,000 shares can be resold under Rule 144.

 

DIVIDEND POLICY

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business. As a result, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

 

14

---

 

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

As of the date of this prospectus, there is no market for our securities. After the date of this prospectus, we expect to have an application filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for our common stock to be eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. Until our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, the selling security holders will be offering our shares of common stock at a fixed price of $0.10 per common share. After our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, the selling security holders may, from time to time, sell all or a portion of the shares of common stock on OTC Bulletin Board, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. After our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such sales may be at fixed prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the market prices or at negotiated prices.

After our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, the shares of common stock being offered for resale by this prospectus may be sold by the selling security holders by one or more of the following methods, without limitation:

·	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker solicits purchasers;

·	privately negotiated transactions;

·	market sales (both long and short to the extent permitted under the federal securities laws);

·	at the market to or through market makers or into an existing market for the shares;

·	through transactions in options, swaps or other derivatives (whether exchange listed or otherwise); and

·	a combination of any of the aforementioned methods of sale.

In the event of the transfer by any of the selling security holders of its shares of common stock to any pledgee, donee or other transferee, we will amend this prospectus and the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part by the filing of a post-effective amendment in order to have the pledgee, donee or other transferee in place of the selling security holder who has transferred his, her or its shares.

 

In effecting sales, brokers and dealers engaged by the selling security holders may arrange for other brokers or dealers to participate. Brokers or dealers may receive commissions or discounts from a selling security holder or, if any of the broker-dealers act as an agent for the purchaser of such shares, from a purchaser in amounts to be negotiated which are not expected to exceed those customary in the types of transactions involved. Before our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, broker-dealers may agree with a selling security holder to sell a specified number of the shares of common stock at a price per share of $0.10. After our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, broker-dealers may agree with a selling security holder to sell a specified number of the shares of common stock at a stipulated price per share. Such an agreement may also require the broker-dealer to purchase as principal any unsold shares of common stock at the price required to fulfill the broker-dealer commitment to the selling security holder if such broker-dealer is unable to sell the shares on behalf of the selling security holder. Broker-dealers who acquire shares of common stock as principal may thereafter resell the shares of common stock from time to time in transactions which may involve block transactions and sales to and through other broker-dealers, including transactions of the nature described above. After our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such sales by a broker-dealer could be at prices and on terms then prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the then-current market price or in negotiated transactions. In connection with such re-sales, the broker-dealer may pay to or receive from the purchasers of the shares commissions as described above.

 

 

15

---

 

 

The selling security holders and any broker-dealers or agents that participate with the selling security holders in the sale of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with these sales. In that event, any commissions received by the broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares of common stock purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.

 

From time to time, any of the selling security holders may pledge shares of common stock pursuant to the margin provisions of customer agreements with brokers. Upon a default by a selling security holder, their broker may offer and sell the pledged shares of common stock from time to time. After our common stock becomes eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, upon a sale of the shares of common stock, the selling security holders intend to comply with the prospectus delivery requirements under the Securities Act by delivering a prospectus to each purchaser in the transaction. We intend to file any amendments or other necessary documents in compliance with the Securities Act that may be required in the event any of the selling security holders defaults under any customer agreement with brokers.

 

To the extent required under the Securities Act, a post effective amendment to this registration statement will be filed disclosing the name of any broker-dealers, the number of shares of common stock involved, the price at which the shares of common stock is to be sold, the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealers, where applicable, that such broker-dealers did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and other facts material to the transaction.

 

We and the selling security holders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations under it, including, without limitation, Rule 10b-5 and, insofar as a selling security holder is a distribution participant and we, under certain circumstances, may be a distribution participant, under Regulation M. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of common stock.

 

All expenses of the registration statement including, but not limited to, legal, accounting, printing and mailing fees are and will be borne by us. Any commissions, discounts or other fees payable to brokers or dealers in connection with any sale of the shares of common stock will be borne by the selling security holders, the purchasers participating in such transaction, or both.

 

Any shares of common stock covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, as amended, may be sold under Rule 144 rather than pursuant to this prospectus.

 

PENNY STOCK RULES

 

The Securities Exchange Commission has also adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks” as such term is defined by Rule 15g-9. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system).

 

The shares offered by this prospectus constitute penny stock under the Securities and Exchange Act. The shares will remain penny stock for the foreseeable future. The classification of penny stock makes it more difficult for a broker-dealer to sell the stock into a secondary market, which makes it more difficult for a purchaser to liquidate his or her investment. Any broker-dealer engaged by the purchaser for the purpose of selling his or her shares in our company will be subject to the penny stock rules.

 

 

16

---

 

 

The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, which: (i) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (ii) contains a description of the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities’ laws; (iii) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (iv) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (v) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (vi) contains such other information and is in such form as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation. The broker-dealer also must provide to the customer, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, (i) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (ii) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (iii) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (iv) monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.

 

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements will have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock because it will be subject to these penny stock rules. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling those securities.

 

REGULATION M

 

During such time as we may be engaged in a distribution of any of the shares we are registering by this registration statement, we are required to comply with Regulation M. In general, Regulation M precludes any selling security holder, any affiliated purchasers and any broker-dealer or other person who participates in a distribution from bidding for or purchasing, or attempting to induce any person to bid for or purchase, any security which is the subject of the distribution until the entire distribution is complete. Regulation M defines a “distribution” as an offering of securities that is distinguished from ordinary trading activities by the magnitude of the offering and the presence of special selling efforts and selling methods. Regulation M also defines a “distribution participant” as an underwriter, prospective underwriter, broker, dealer, or other person who has agreed to participate or who is participating in a distribution.

 

Regulation M under the Exchange Act prohibits, with certain exceptions, participants in a distribution from bidding for or purchasing, for an account in which the participant has a beneficial interest, any of the securities that are the subject of the distribution. Regulation M also governs bids and purchases made in order to stabilize the price of a security in connection with a distribution of the security. We have informed the selling shareholders that the anti-manipulation provisions of Regulation M may apply to the sales of their shares offered by this prospectus, and we have also advised the selling shareholders of the requirements for delivery of this prospectus in connection with any sales of the common stock offered by this prospectus.

 

 

17

---

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

ORGANIZATION WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS

 

On September 14, 2009, the Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. We are engaged in the business of acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties.

 

Art Kerry has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, from September 14, 2009, until the current date. Our board of directors is comprised of two persons: Art Kerry and Ivan Arredondo.

 

We are authorized to issue 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share. On October 6, 2009, we offered, sold and issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Art Kerry, and on the same date we also offered, sold and issued 2,500,000 shares of our common stock to Ivan Arredondo. The purchased were paid at a purchase price of the par value per share of $0.001 per share, for total proceeds of $5,000.

 

On March 3, 2012 we entered into a Mineral Property Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with Brian Fowler, William Roberts and Jason Shaver (collectively, “Optionors”), whereby we have the right to acquire a 100% interest in three mining claims , claims numbers 4263523, 4263524 and 4266933 (collectively, the “Johnny Lake Property”), located in the Thunder Bay Mining District of the Province of Ontario, Canada. In order exercise our option to acquire 100% of the claims underlying the Johnny Lake Property, the Option Agreement requires us to make a total of $30,000 in payments to the Optionors, in four payments, as follows: (i) an initial cash payment of $15,000, which we paid on March 3, 2012, (ii) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2013, which $5,000 we paid on March 3, 2013, (iii) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2014, and (iv) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2015. A net smelter royalty (“NSR”) of 2% is carried by the Optionors through the life of mine on the property. The Company has the right to purchase at any time 1% of the NSR from the Optionors for $1,000,000, and the option expires July 6, 2015. We retained a consulting geologist, Caitlin Jeffs, P.Geo., to prepare an evaluation report on the Johnny Lake Property. We intend to conduct exploratory activities on the Johnny Lake Property and if feasible, develop the prospects.

 

IN GENERAL

 

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. We currently hold an option, under the Option Agreement, to acquire a 100% undivided interest the Johnny Lake Property located in the Thunder Bay Mining District of the Province of Ontario, Canada. We are currently conducting mineral exploration activities on the Johnny Lake Property in order to assess whether it contains any commercially exploitable mineral reserves. Currently there are no known mineral reserves on the Johnny Lake Property.

Since our inception, we have not earned any revenues to date and our net losses are $5,352 at March 31, 2013. Our independent auditor has issued an audit opinion which includes a statement expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The source of information contained in this discussion is our geology report prepared by Caitlin Jeffs, P.Geo., dated March 18, 2013.

While we intend to test for commercially viable reserves of gold, sulphur and pyrite occurrence with secondary silver, there is the likelihood of our mineral claim containing little or no economic mineralization or reserves of gold and other minerals. We are presently in the exploration stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that any commercially viable mineral deposits exist on our mineral claims, that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our property, or, if such deposits are discovered, that we will enter into further substantial exploration programs. Further exploration is required before a final determination can be made as to whether our mineral claims possess commercially exploitable mineral deposits. If our claim does not contain any reserves all funds that we spend on exploration will be lost.

We have no current plans, proposals or arrangements, written or otherwise, to seek a business combination with another entity in the near future.

 

 

18

---

 

POTENTIAL ACQUISITION OF THE JOHNNY LAKE PROPERTY

On March 3, 2012, we purchased an option to acquire a 100% undivided interest in three mineral claims, known as the Johnny Lake Property, located in the Thunder Bay Mining District of the Province of Ontario, Canada, under the terms of the Option Agreement. The mineral claims underlying the option were granted by the Ministry of Northern development and Mines, Province of Ontario, Canada, on March 5, 2012.

We engaged Fladgate Exploration Consulting Corporation to prepare a geological evaluation report on the Johnny Lake Property. Caitlin Jeffs, HBSc, P.Geo. is the professional geologist who authored the report. Ms. Jeffs graduated from the University of British Columbia in 2002 with an honors bachelor of science in geology. She is a professional geologist on the register of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario.

The work completed by Ms. Jeffs in preparing the geological report consisted of a review of geological data from previous exploration within the region. The acquisition of this data involved the research and investigation of historical files to locate and retrieve data information acquired by previous exploration companies in the area of the mineral claims.

We received the geological evaluation report on the Johnny Lake Property entitled “Johnny Lake Property; Property Review Report” prepared by Ms. Jeffs on March 18, 2013. The geological report summarizes the results of the history of the exploration of the mineral claims, the regional and local geology of the mineral claims and the mineralization and the geological formations identified as a result of the prior exploration. The geological report also gives conclusions regarding potential mineralization of the mineral claims and recommends a further geological exploration program on the mineral claims. The description of the Johnny Lake Property provided below is based on Ms. Jeffs’s report.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The Johnny Lake Property is located in the Thunder Bay South District of the Thunder Bay Mining Division and the Thunder Bay Ministry of Natural Resources District, Ontario, Canada, approximately 55 km west of Marathon, Ontario and 28 km east of Terrace Bay, Ontario. The Johnny Lake Property is accessible via a trappers trail from the Trans-Canada Highway, then by boat to the north end of Johnny Lake.

 

The Johnny Lake Property consists of 3 contiguous claims blocks known as the Johnny Lake Property. The claims are comprised of 3 mining claims totaling 34 units and covering 543.9 hectares. It is approximately 3.2 km long by 2.0 km wide in an irregular shape. The Johnny Lake Property is covered by National Topographic System (NTS) map sheet 42D/15SW. The center of the Johnny Lake Property has approximate geographic coordinates of Latitude 48 o 47’43” North, Longitude 86 o 52’44” West, UTM NAD 83, Zone 16, 508894.6 mE, 5404705.3 mN.

ACCESSIBILITY

The Johnny Lake Property is located in the Thunder Bay South District of the Thunder Bay Mining Division and the Thunder Bay Ministry of Natural Resources District, Ontario, Canada, approximately 55 km west of Marathon, Ontario and 28 km east of Terrace Bay, Ontario (Figure 1). The property is accessable from the north shore of Johnny Lake and the northeast shore of Foxxe Lake, both lakes are located on the north side of Highway 11/17.

 

 

19

---

 

 

 

Figure 1 – Johnny Lake Johnny Lake Property Location Map

 

 

20

---

 

PHYSIOGRAPHY, CLIMATE, VEGETATION & INFRASTRUCTURE

The Property lies on the northern shore of Lake Superior. Relief around the area of the properties varies from approximately 200 m (Lake Superior mean level at 180 m ASL) to 400 m above sea level. Topography in the region is highly variable, generally rising from Lake Superior in the south to a rugged Precambrian shield terrain characterized by large hills and rapid elevation changes.

 

The area is characterized by generally cooler spring and summer temperatures with relatively warmer fall and winter temperatures. Average spring and summer daily temperatures range from 1.7 o C in April to 15.9 o C in July. Fall and winter temperatures range from highs of 4.9 o C in October to lows of -15.1 o C in January. The moderate temperatures are a function of proximity to Lake Superior; the degree of moderation diminishes relative to the distance inland from the lake. Despite the moderating effect of the lake, temperatures of 33 o C in July and -38 o C in January have been recorded. The total annual precipitation is 892 mm of which 468 mm is in the form of rain, and the remaining 424 mm as snowfall. There are no guaranteed frost-free days, meaning that frost can occur at any time, even during the summer season.

The region is characterized by mid boreal forest which typically includes aspen, white birch, white spruce and balsam fir stands with abundant jack, red and white pine, particularly on rocky, topographic highs. Black spruce, balsam fir and alder are common in marshy areas and along drainage arteries. The forest also contains hundreds of plant species such as ferns, moss, fungi, shrubs and herbs.

 

Larger mammals in the area include moose, black bear and grey wolf. Smaller mammals include red fox, snowshoe hare, rabbits, beavers, otter, pine martins, porcupine and squirrels. Prominent Caribou herds exist on Slate Island, approximately 12 km south of the property with few Caribou documented on the mainland. Other wildlife of note include an increasing number of sandhill cranes, bald eagles (endangered in Ontario), loons, Ruffed and Spruce Grouse, a variety of ducks and smaller song birds.

Infrastructure proximal to the Property includes all season access roads and trails which connect to the Trans-Canada Highway. Skilled labor forces are available from both the community of Marathon and Terrace Bay. Access to hydro-electrical grid is also readily available. The city of Thunder Bay, Ontario, approximately 244 km west of the Johnny Lake Property, provides logistical and industrial support in addition to skilled labor. It is also the closest port to the property and provides seaboard access via Lake Superior.

 

 

21

---

 

 

 

Figure 2 – Johnny Lake Property Contiguous Land Tenure

 

 

22

---

 

PROPERTY HISTORY

The area has been explored for precious metals, base metals and magmatic sulphides since the first recorded gold discovery by W.H. Arnold in 1896. Known as Fire Mountain Occurrence (MDI42D15SW00027), the discovery is described as a large gossan, thought to be sulphide facies iron formation hosting auriferous quartz veins. According to MDI information, a December 5 th , 1896 Daily Journal article reported: “the ore is of a slate formation, highly mineralized and carrying galena, copper and iron pyrites in good quantities. Assays have been made and they run from $1.50 (0.08 oz./ton) to $40 (2.12 oz./ton) per ton gold”. It is estimated that gold values at that time were $18.83 per ounce in 1896 (Resident Geologist’s Mineral Deposit Files, Schreiber-Hemlo District, Thunder Bay). Grab samples collected from the vicinity of the adit in 1991 by OGS Resident Geologist staff returned assay values which varied from nil to 0.012 opt Au, 56 to 296 ppm Cu and 76 to 324 ppm Zn.

 

The Johnny Lake Property is composed of three contiguous claims which contain two historic Mineral Deposit Inventory (“MDI”) occurrences. Occurrences in the Johnny Lake Property area include:

·

MDI42D15SW00034 - Kingdom Occurrence. Described as a gold, sulphur and pyrite occurrence with secondary silver. The occurrence is located at NAD 83, Z 16, 507901 mE, 5405104 mN. Occurs in an Algoman-type sulphide facies iron formation which strikes northeast, dips sub-vertically and is up to 10 metres wide.

·	MDI42D15SW00018 – Steel Mountain Occurrence. Described as a sulphur and pyrite occurrence. Located at NAD 83, Z 16, 509140 mE, 5405668 mN. No description provided however probably represents Algoman-type sulphide facies iron formation, a potential target for economic gold mineralization.

The Johnny Lake Property has been explored for precious and base metals since the first discoveries in the area ca. 1950. Initial exploration efforts were for base metal deposits in light of the discovery of the Geco mine in Manitouwadge, Ontario. After Hemlo was discovered in the 1980’s, exploration focused on gold mineralization. Due to the numerous discoveries in the Steel Mountain area, the Ontario Geological Survey (“OGS”) commenced “Operation Treasure Hunt”, a lake sediment sampling program published in 1997 by Dyer in OGS Open File Report 5964.

Results of the high density regional lake sediment and water survey were plotted, outlining high, moderate and low priority target areas. In the Steel River area, target 17 was identified as a high priority target with anomalous Ni, Cr, Sb and Ag values indicating a magmatic sulphide signature on the Johnny Lake Property. North of the Johnny Lake Property in the Spider Lake area, target 21 outlined a medium priority target with anomalous Cu, Zn and Mo values indicating a base metal signature.

Though the OGS work did not highlight potential gold targets, the two historical MDI occurrences are described as gold in iron formation. The gold model suggests targeting dilatant zones where they intersect chemical traps such as at the Kingdom occurrence, where sulphide facies iron formation hosts gold mineralization. Base metal targets include magmatic Ni-Cu-Cr associated with mafic intrusions and Pb-Zn-Ag associated with meta-sedimentary and meta-volcanic rocks on the property. In general, the lithologic variability on the property should be explored for dilatant shear zone development along lithologic contacts as possible sites for Au and poly-metallic mineralization.

Historical assessment work on the property has been documented by the government since 1983 and includes a number of geophysical airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys between 1983 and 1985 followed by geological mapping and prospecting between 1995 and as recently as 2008 (Table 2). This work has yielded gold values up to 0.10 oz/t (3.1 g/t) Au at the Kingdom occurrence but no major discoveries have yet been made in the area. Table 2 lists the Johnny Lake Property’s exploration history since 1983.

 

 

23

---

 

Table 2 – Exploration History in the Johnny Lake Property Area

 

Year	Operator	Work	Principal Reference
1983	Douglas Collingwood	Steel River Claims Report on combined Heli-borne Mag, EM and VLF-EM Surveys	F. Scott
1983	Cumberland Resources	Steel River Area Heli-borne Mag & EM Survey	G. Boustead/R.L.S. Hogg
1983	Decker Lake Mines Ltd	Santoy Bay Claims Heli-borne Mag, EM & VLF-EM Survey	F. Scott
1984	Cumberland Resources	West Hemlo Project Geochemical Soil Sampling and Geological Mapping Program	G. Steinert
1984	Decker Resources Ltd.	Little Santoy Lake Property Geological Report	I. Coster, N. Caira
1984	Grandview Resources Inc.	Steel River Property Geophysical Report	R.J. Meikle
1995	Echo Bay Mines Ltd.	Steel River Property Reconnaissance Geological Program	J.G. Clark
2000	Michano/Gionet/Courtney Prospectors	Black Fox Lake Gold Property Geological Mapping and Prospecting Report	D. Courtney
2002	Michano/Gionet/Courtney Prospectors	Black Fox Lake Gold Property Prospecting Report	D. Michano
2002	Cairngorn Mines Ltd.	Steel Mountain Property Geological Mapping and Prospecting	D. Courtney
2004	Russel Renner Prospector	Fire Mountain West Property Geological Mapping, Prospecting and Lithogeochemical report	R. Renner
2005	Phoenix Matachewan Mines	Steel River Project Linecutting, Prospecting and Mapping Report	J.M. Franklin/L.A. Giroux/C.A. Wagg
2006	Phoenix Matachewan Mines	Terrace Bay Project Heli-borne TDEM Survey	S. Grant
2008	Lund Gold	Black Fox Property Assessment Report	A. Banas/D. Besserer/K. Raffle

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Johnny Lake Property is underlain by Archaen supracrustal and plutonic rocks of the Wawa-Abitibi Sub-Province of the Superior Province (Figure 3). The Johnny Lake area is underlain by the east-west trending Hemlo-Schreiber Greenstone Belt which hosts the prolific Hemlo Gold Camp, a producer of in excess of 25M oz Au. Past producers in the belt include the Winston Lake Cu-Zn-Ag mine in the northwest, north of Schreiber, Ontario, and the Geco mine in the northeast near Manitouwadge, Ontario. The central portion of the belt, east of the Johnny Lake Property, has been subdivided by the Proterozoic aged Coldwell Complex. The Coldwell Complex is a silica undersaturated felsic to mafic intrusion which hosts the high tonnage, low grade, Marathon Deposit. The deposit consists of Cu-PGE-Au mineralization host in vari-textured gabbroic phases of the intrusion, and is currently being developed by Stillwater Mining Canada.

 

 

24

---

 

 

Figure 3 – Geologic Sub-Provinces of the Superior Province

 

 

25

---

 

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The felsic volcanic sequences in the Steel River area form the core of an anticlinal sequence of rhyolite domes, coarse epiclastic breccias and thin, laterally discontinuous tuffaceous horizons that are intruded by felsic to mafic dykes. The southern portion of the belt is characterized by mafic volcanic rocks with intercalated sedimentary units, including Algoma-type iron formation, which have all been intruded by mafic to ultramafic intrusive bodies (Figure 4). The geology of the Kingdom occurrence is described as Algoma-type sulphide facies ironstone that strikes northeast, has a near vertical dip, and varies up to 10 m in width. The ironstone consists of interlaminated pyrite, graphitic slate, and minor chert. It is situated between graded turbidite sequences (and a possible tuffaceous unit) to the northwest and pillowed metavolcanics to the southeast. The metasediments have been folded and have a well-developed axial planar cleavage, especially in the graphitic slates. Late diabase dikes and a felsic porphyry intrude the sequence in the vicinity of the ironstone. Narrow quartz veins parallel to the cleavage are present (Patterson, 1984).

MINERALIZATION

A complex structural history exists in the belt that has never been adequately documented. A major antiform/synform exists north of the property, the axial plane trending east-west with felsic and meta-sedimentary horizons at the core and mafic volcanic horizons on the periphery. Numerous minor north-south trending faults are interpreted to offset felsic tuff and meta-sedimentary horizons. Late Riedel shears appear to develop locally along lithologic contacts and within chemical precipitate horizons creating en-echelon quartz veining and depositing gold.

 

 

Figure 4 – Geology of the Schreiber-Hemlo Greenstone Belt, Johnny Lake Project Area

 

 

26

---

 

EXPLORATION POTENTIAL

The Johnny Lake Property lies in a rugged and underexplored portion of the Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt. Based on historic work completed in the Johnny Lake Property area, Fladgate recommends a two phase exploration program designed to further examine the potential for economically viable gold or magmatic Ni-Cu-Co mineralization that may exist on the property. Phase one would consist of line-cutting and soil sampling followed by a phase two program of geological mapping, prospecting and litho-geochemical sampling. Fladgate suggests a total budget of approximately $115,459.00 to complete the work programs.

 

Phase 1 Line-cutting & Soil Sampling

 

The phase one soil sampling program would include cutting a 200m spaced grid across high priority portions of the Property. Soil geochemical samples would be taken every 25m to evaluate targets obscured by areas of thick overburden. The Johnny Lake Property would require approximately 17 line kilometres in two separate grids and 300 soil samples. Fladgate suggests $40,422 to complete this work.

Table 3 – Phase One Budget Recommendations – Johnny Lake Property

 

Item	Units	Unit Cost ($/unit)	Units	Cost
Line-cutting	Ln-km	$700	17	$11,900
Soil Geochemical Assays	Sample	$20	600	$12,000
Transportation	Month	$2,000	1/2	$1,000
Accommodation & Meals	Month	$4,500	1/2	$2,250
Soil Sampling Labor	Day	$800	5	$4,000
Compilation & Reporting	Day	$800	5	$4,000
Sub-Total				$35,150
15% Contingency				$5,272
Total				$40,422

The basis of the foregoing cost estimates are from the geological exploration advice of Caitlin Jeffs, our professional consulting geologist.

 

 

27

---

 

 

Phase 2 Geological Mapping, Litho-geochemical Sampling & Prospecting

The phase two program would include geological mapping and litho-geochemical sampling of the grid to outline high priority exploration targets. Property wide prospecting will also be useful to generate targets and develop current targets. The Johnny Lake Property would require two field mapping crews and one prospecting crew for approximately 15 days to map and prospect the Property. Fladgate suggests $75,037 to complete this work.

Table 4 – Phase Two Budget Recommendations – Johnny Lake Property

 

Item	Units	Unit Cost ($/unit)	Units	Cost
Prospecting Samples	Sample	$30	300	$9,000
Litho-Geochemical Assays	Sample	$80	50	$4,000
Transportation	Month	$2,000	1/2	$1,000
Accommodation & Meals	Month	$4,500	1/2	$2,250
Prospecting Labor	Day	$400	60	$24,000
Geological Mapping	Day	$700	30	$21,000
Compilation & Reporting	Day	$800	5	$4,000
Sub-Total				$65,250
15% Contingency				$9,787
Total				$75,037

The basis of the foregoing cost estimates are from the geological exploration advice of Caitlin Jeffs, our professional consulting geologist. Such costs will not differ depending on the minerals we find in Phase I.

CONDITIONS TO RETAIN TITLE TO THE CLAIM

Under the laws and regulations of the Province of Ontario, Canada, the mining claims underlying the Property are subject to annual exploration expenditures. Minimum annual exploration expenditures for the 3 claims in the Johnny Lake Property are $13,600.

 

 

28

---

 

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

 

The mineral exploration business is an extremely competitive industry. We are competing with many other exploration companies looking for minerals. We are a very early stage mineral exploration company and a very small participant in the mineral exploration business. Being a junior mineral exploration company, we compete with other companies like ours for financing and joint venture partners. Additionally, we compete for resources such as professional geologists, camp staff, helicopters and mineral exploration supplies.

 

GOVERNMENT APPROVALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the exploration of minerals in Canada and the Province of Ontario.

 

COSTS AND EFFECTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

 

We currently have no costs to comply with environmental laws concerning our exploration program. We will also have to sustain the cost of reclamation and environmental remediation for all work undertaken which causes sufficient surface disturbance to necessitate reclamation work. Both reclamation and environmental remediation refer to putting disturbed ground back as close to its original state as possible. Other potential pollution or damage must be cleaned-up and renewed along standard guidelines outlined in the usual permits. Reclamation is the process of bringing the land back to a natural state after completion of exploration activities. Environmental remediation refers to the physical activity of taking steps to remediate, or remedy, any environmental damage caused, i.e. refilling trenches after sampling or cleaning up fuel spills. Our initial programs do not require any reclamation or remediation other than minor clean up and removal of supplies because of minimal disturbance to the ground. The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the extent of the exploration program we will undertake, beyond completion of the recommended three phases described in the chart below. Because there is presently no information on the size, tenor, or quality of any resource or reserve at this time, it is impossible to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on our earnings or competitive position in the event a potentially economic deposit is discovered.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

We currently have no employees other than our directors and officers. We intend to retain the services of geologists, prospectors and consultants on a contract basis to conduct the exploration programs on our mineral claims and to assist with regulatory compliance and preparation of financial statements.

 

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICES

 

Our executive offices are located at Loma de Bernal 3, Loma Dorada C.P. 76060, Queretaro, Quetaro, Mexico.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company. The Company’s mineral claim is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

 

 

29

---

 

 

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

MARKET INFORMATION

 

ADMISSION TO QUOTATION ON THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD

 

We intend to have our common stock be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. If our securities are not quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, a security holder may find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our securities. The OTC Bulletin Board differs from national and regional stock exchanges in that it:

 

(1) is not situated in a single location but operates through communication of bids, offers and confirmations between broker-dealers, and (2) securities admitted to quotation are offered by one or more Broker-dealers rather than the “specialist” common to stock exchanges.

 

To qualify for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, an equity security must have one registered broker-dealer, known as the market maker, willing to list bid or sale quotations and to sponsor the company listing. We do not yet have an agreement with a registered broker-dealer, as the market maker, willing to list bid or sale quotations and to sponsor the Company listing. If the Company meets the qualifications for trading securities on the OTC Bulletin Board our securities will trade on the OTC Bulletin Board until a future time, if at all. We may not now and it may never qualify for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.

 

TRANSFER AGENT

 

We have not retained a transfer agent to serve as transfer agent for shares of our common stock. Until we engage such a transfer agent, we will be responsible for all record-keeping and administrative functions in connection with the shares of our common stock.

 

HOLDERS

 

As of May 13, 2013, the Company had 6,850,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding held by 30 holders of record. The selling stockholders are offering hereby up to 1,850,000 shares of common stock at fixed price of $0.10 per share.

 

DIVIDEND POLICY

 

We have not declared or paid dividends on our common stock since our formation, and we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Declaration or payment of dividends, if any, in the future, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our then current financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. There are no contractual restrictions on our ability to declare or pay dividends. See the Risk Factor entitled, “Because we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.”

 

 

30

---

 

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

We have no equity compensation or stock option plans. We may in the future adopt a stock option plan as our mineral exploration activities progress.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Certain statements contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our intent, belief or current expectations, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of the Company and the products we expect to offer and other statements contained herein regarding matters that are not historical facts, are “forward-looking” statements. Future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, future press releases and future oral or written statements made by us or with our approval, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain forward-looking statements, because such statements include risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.

PLAN OF OPERATION

Our plan of operation for the twelve months following the date of this prospectus is to complete the first and second phases of the exploration program on our prospects. In addition to the $115,459 we anticipate spending for the first two phases of the exploration program as outlined below, we anticipate spending an additional $12,525 on general and administration expenses including fees payable in connection with the filing of our registration statement and complying with reporting obligations, and general administrative costs. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be approximately $127,967. We will experience a shortage of funds prior to funding and we may utilize funds from our president, however he has no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to the company.

 

PHASE 1

Item	Units	Unit Cost ($/unit)	Units	Cost
Line-cutting	Ln-km	$700	17	$11,900
Soil Geochemical Assays	Sample	$20	600	$12,000
Transportation	Month	$2,000	1/2	$1,000
Accommodation & Meals	Month	$4,500	1/2	$2,250
Soil Sampling Labor	Day	$800	5	$4,000
Compilation & Reporting	Day	$800	5	$4,000
Sub-Total				$35,150
15% Contingency				$5,272
Total				$40,422

 

 

31

---

 

 

PHASE 2

Item	Units	Unit Cost ($/unit)	Units	Cost
Prospecting Samples	Sample	$30	300	$9,000
Litho-Geochemical Assays	Sample	$80	50	$4,000
Transportation	Month	$2,000	1/2	$1,000
Accommodation & Meals	Month	$4,500	1/2	$2,250
Prospecting Labor	Day	$400	60	$24,000
Geological Mapping	Day	$700	30	$21,000
Compilation & Reporting	Day	$800	5	$4,000
Sub-Total				$65,250
15% Contingency				$9,787
Total				$75,037

 

We plan to commence Phase 1 of the exploration program on the prospects in the fall of 2013. We expect this phase to take 10 days to complete and an additional one to two months for the geologist to prepare her report.

 

The above program costs are management’s estimates based upon the recommendations of the consulting geologist’s report and the actual project costs may exceed our estimates. To date, we have not commenced exploration.

 

Following Phase 1 of the exploration program, if it proves successful in identifying mineral deposits, we intend to proceed with Phase 2 of our exploration program. Management will rely on the consulting geologist’s recommendations in making a decision to proceed with Phase 2. Subject to the results of Phase 1, we anticipate commencing with Phase 2 in the winter of 2014. We will require additional funding to commence with Phase 1 work on the prospects; we have no current plans on how to raise the additional funding. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to proceed with any work after the first phase of the exploration program.

 

 

32

---

 

 

On March 3, 2012 we entered into a Mineral Property Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with Brian Fowler, William Roberts and Jason Shaver (collectively, “Optionors”), whereby we have the right to acquire a 100% interest in three mining claims , claims numbers 4263523, 4263524 and 4266933 (collectively, the “Johnny Lake Property”), located in the Thunder Bay Mining District of the Province of Ontario, Canada. In order exercise our option to acquire 100% of the claims underlying the Johnny Lake Property, the Option Agreement requires us to make a total of $30,000 in payments to the Optionors, in four payments, as follows: (i) an initial cash payment of $15,000, which we paid on March 3, 2012, (ii) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2013, which $5,000 we paid on March 3, 2013, (iii) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2014, and (iv) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2015. A net smelter royalty (“NSR”) of 2% is carried by the Optionors through the life of mine on the property. The Company has the right to purchase at any time 1% of the NSR from the Optionors for $1,000,000, and the option expires July 6, 2015.

 

If we fail to pay the exercise price, we will not have the right to conduct exploration activities at all. Currently, we do not have sufficient funds to pay the exercise price. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds pay the exercise price, and we have no current plans on how to raise the additional funding. In terms of exploratory work we will be able to conduct before we exercise the option, we anticipate completing Phases 1 and 2 of our Plan of Operation, subject to our ability to raise sufficient funds to complete Phases 1 and 2, and depending on the results of Phases 1 and 2, commencement of drilling of any significant targets generated during Phase 2 work.

 

BUDGET

 

ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT PLAN

 

We intend to continue to have our President prepare our quarterly and annual financial statements and have these financial statements reviewed or audited by our independent auditor. Our independent auditor is expected to charge us approximately $1,500 to review our quarterly financial statements and approximately $3,000 to audit our annual financial statements. In the next twelve months, we anticipate spending approximately $11,000 to pay for our accounting and audit requirements.

 

SEC FILING PLAN

 

We intend to become a reporting company in 2013 after our registration statement on Form S-1 is declared effective. This means that we will file documents with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on a quarterly basis.

 

We expect to incur filing costs of approximately $1,000 per quarter to support our quarterly and annual filings. In the next twelve months, we anticipate spending approximately $10,000 for legal costs in connection with our three quarterly filings, annual filing, and costs associated with filing the registration statement to register our common stock.

 

 

33

---

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

We have had no operating revenues since our inception on September 14, 2009, through March 31, 2013. Our activities have been financed from the proceeds of share subscriptions. From our inception to March 31, 2013 we have raised a total of $57,500 from private offerings of our common stock. All such private offerings were made in reliance on the exemption from registration afforded by Rule 903(b)(3) of Regulation S, promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company made all offers and sales offshore of the US, to non-US persons, with no directed selling efforts in the US, and where offering restrictions were implemented.

 

For the year ended March 31, 2013, we incurred operating costs of $4,932, consisting of $4,867 of Mineral property pre-exploration consulting fees and $65 of general and administrative expenses, and we had $26 of interest income and $14 of interest expense. For the year ended March 31, 2012, we incurred operating costs of $24, consisting entirely of general and administrative expenses, and we had $37 of interest income and $2 of interest expense.

 

For the period from inception on September 14, 2099 to March 31, 2013, we incurred total operating costs of $5,431, consisting of mineral property pre-exploration consulting fees of $4,867 and general and administrative expenses of $564 , and we incurred a net loss of $5,352.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

At March 31 and May 16, 2013, we had a cash balance of $32,164. Our expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $137,967, consisting of approximately $127,967 for the work program under our plan of operation, and approximately $10,000 for the exercise of our option to acquire a 100% interest in the Johnny Lake Property prior to July 6, 2015.

 

Based on our current cash position, we will be able to continue operations for approximately 12 months, assuming we do not raise additional funding. We believe our current cash and net working capital balance is only sufficient to cover our expenses for filing required quarterly and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our status as a corporation in the State of Nevada for the next 12 months. We must raise approximately $127,967, to complete our plan of operation for the next 12 months. Additional funding will likely come from equity financing from the sale of our common stock, if we are able to sell such stock. If we are successful in completing an equity financing, existing shareholders will experience dilution of their interest in our Company. We do not have any financing arranged and we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund our exploration activities. In the absence of such financing, our business will fail. There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our exploration of the Johnny Lake Property and our business will fail.

 

GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATION

 

We have not generated any revenues since inception. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had accumulated losses of $5,352. Our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the accompanying financial statements regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability or classification of asset-carrying amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

 

34

---

 

 

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS.

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect our liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s financial statements are presented in United States dollars and are prepared using the accrual method of accounting which conforms to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

Going Concern

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company anticipates future losses in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods presented. The Company is required to make judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, deferred income tax asset valuations and loss contingences. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although, we believe our judgments and estimates are appropriate, actual future results may be different; if different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, the results could be materially different from our reported results.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Codification topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments when it is practicable to estimate that value. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 approximate their respective fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

 

35

---

 

Mineral Properties

Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized in accordance with Codification topic 930 “Extractive Activities - Mining”. Mineral property pre-exploration and exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property are capitalized. To date the Company has not established any reserves on its mineral properties.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-Lived assets, such as property and equipment, mineral properties, and purchased intangibles with finite lives (subject to amortization), are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable in accordance with Codification topic 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment”. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of its estimated useful life.

Recoverability of assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by an asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. The estimated fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. Any impairment in value is recognized as an expense in the period when the impairment occurs. The Company’s management has considered the conditions outlined in Codification topic 360 and has concluded no impairment of the $19,984 mineral claim acquisition costs has taken place for the year ended March 31, 2013.

Rehabilitation Provisions

The Company is subject to various government laws and regulations relating to environmental disturbances which are caused by exploration and evaluation activities. The Company will record the present value for the estimated costs of legal and constructive obligations required to restore the exploration sites in the period in which the obligation is incurred. The nature of the rehabilitation activities includes restoration, reclamation and re-vegetation of the affected exploration sites. The Company has determined that there are no rehabilitation provisions at March 31, 2013.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided in accordance with Codification topic 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires an asset and liability approach for the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Current income tax expense (benefit) is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable (receivable) for the current year. A deferred tax asset and/or liability is computed for both the expected future impact of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred income tax expense is generally the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset and liability. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be “more likely than not” realized in future tax returns. Tax rate changes and changes in tax laws are reflected in income in the period such changes are enacted.

 

 

36

---

 

Uncertain Tax Positions

Codification topic 740 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes is addressed by a two-step method of first evaluating whether a tax position has met a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and second, measuring that tax position to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with Codification topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” for the periods presented. Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share has not been presented because there are no dilutive items. Diluted earnings loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive stock options, warrants, and convertible debt are converted or exercised by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Options, warrants and/or convertible debt will have a dilutive effect, during periods of net profit, only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise or conversion price of the items.

Share-based Compensation

Codification topic 718 “Stock Compensation” requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements and establishes fair value as the measurement objective for share-based payment transactions with employees and acquired goods or services from non-employees. The codification also provides guidance on valuing and expensing these awards, as well as disclosure requirements of these equity arrangements. The Company adopted the codification upon creation of the company and will expense share based costs in the period incurred. The Company has not adopted a stock option plan or completed a share-based transaction; accordingly no stock-based compensation has been recorded to date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangibles asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impairs, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification subtopic 350-30, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The Company elected early adoption of this update and it had no impact on its financial statements.

 

 

37

---

 

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

Our executive officer’s and director’s and their respective ages are as follows:

Name		Age		Positions
Art Kerry		64		President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Ivan Arredondo		36		Director

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officers and directors for the past five years.

 

ART KERRY

 

Art Kerry has served as our President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director since September 14, 2009. From 1987 until 2007 Mr. Kerry was a Manager in the Human Resources division of Imperial Oil. He obtained his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from McGill University in 1975. Mr. Kerry’s background as a manager in a large oil and gas company and his desire to form our Company led to our conclusion that she should be serving as a member of our board of directors in light of our business and structure.

 

IVAN ARREDONDO

 

Ivan Arredondo has served as a Director since April 17, 2008. Mr. Arredondo has worked as an independent mortgage broker in Queretaro, Mexico since 2007. In 2005, he obtained a degree in Computer Engineering from the Institute Technological in Queretaro, Mexico. Mr. Arredondo’s background as a manager led to our conclusion that she should be serving as a member of our board of directors in light of our business and structure.

TERM OF OFFICE

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Company’s Bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will consist of no less than three members. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

 

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Our board of directors is currently composed of two members, neither of whom qualifies as an independent director in accordance with the published listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market (the Company has no plans to list on the NASDAQ Global Market). The NASDAQ independence definition includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees and that neither the director, nor any of her family members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, our board of directors has not made a subjective determination as to our director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, though such subjective determination is required by the NASDAQ rules. Had our board of directors made these determinations, our board of directors would have reviewed and discussed information provided by directors and us with regard to our director’s business and personal activities and relationships as they may relate to us and our management.

 

 

38

---

 

 

SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES AND CONSULTANTS

 

We currently have no employees, other than our sole officer and directors, Art Kerry and Ivan Arredondo.

AUDIT COMMITTEE AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors. The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert, nor has the Board of Directors established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committees are not necessary since the Company is an early exploration stage company and has only two directors, and to date, such directors have been performing the functions of such committees. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, nominations, and audit issues that may affect management decisions.

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers. Other than as described above, we are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executive officers or directors.

 

INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

No director, person nominated to become a director, executive officer, promoter or control person of our company has, during the last ten years: (i) been convicted in or is currently subject to a pending a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (ii) been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to any federal or state securities or banking or commodities laws including, without limitation, in any way limiting involvement in any business activity, or finding any violation with respect to such law, nor (iii) any bankruptcy petition been filed by or against the business of which such person was an executive officer or a general partner, whether at the time of the bankruptcy or for the two years prior thereto.

 

STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

We have not implemented a formal policy or procedure by which our stockholders can communicate directly with our board of directors. Nevertheless, every effort will be made to ensure that the views of stockholders are heard by the board of directors, and that appropriate responses are provided to stockholders in a timely manner. During the upcoming year, our board of directors will continue to monitor whether it would be appropriate to adopt such a process.

 

 

39

---

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The following table sets forth information regarding each element of compensation that we paid or awarded to our named executive officers for fiscal 2013 and 2012:

 

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)				Stock Awards ($) *				Option Awards ($) *				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)				Nonqualified Deferred Compensation ($)				All Other Compensation ($)				Total ($)
Art Kerry; President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director (1)			2013 2012				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-
Ivan Arredondo; Director (2)			2013 2012				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-				-0- -0-

(1) Appointed President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director September 14, 2009.

(2) Appointed Director April 17, 2008.

Our officers and directors have not received monetary compensation since our inception to the date of this prospectus. We currently do not pay any compensation to any officer or any member of our board of directors.

 

STOCK OPTION GRANTS

We had no outstanding equity awards as of the end of the fiscal periods ended March 31, 2013 or 2012, or through the date of filing of this prospectus. The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding stock awards held by our officers and our directors as of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013:

		Option Awards																				Stock Awards
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Art Kerry (1)			-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				N/A				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-
Ivan Arredondo (2)			-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				N/A				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-

(1) Appointed President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director September 14, 2009.

(2) Appointed Director April 17, 2008.

 

 

40

---

 

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

 

The Company is not a party to any employment agreement and has no compensation agreement with any officer or director.

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The following table sets forth director compensation as of March 31, 2013:

 

Name		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)				Stock Awards ($)				Option Awards ($)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)				Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)				All Other Compensation ($)				Total ($)
Art Kerry (1)			-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-
Ivan Arredondo (2)			-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-				-0-

(1) Appointed President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director September 14, 2009.

(2) Appointed Director April 17, 2008.

We have not compensated our directors for their service on our Board of Directors since our inception. There are no arrangements pursuant to which directors will be compensated in the future for any services provided as a director.

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table lists, as of the date of this prospectus, the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

 

 

41

---

 

 

The percentages below are calculated based on 6,850,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of May 13, 2013. We do not have any outstanding warrant, options or other securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of our common stock.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (2)		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percent of Common Stock (1)
Common Stock	Art Kerry (2)			2,500,000	(3)			36.4	%
Common Stock	Ivan Arredondo (4)			2,500,000	(5)			36.4	%
All directors and executive officers as a group (2 persons)				5,000,000				72.9	%

(1) The percentages below are based on 6,850,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.

(2) c/o Madison Ventures Inc., Loma de Bernal 3, Loma Dorada C.P. 76060, Queretaro, Quetaro.

(3) Appointed President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director September 14, 2009.

(4) Appointed Director April 17, 2008.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

On October 6, 2009, we offered and sold 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Art Kerry, our President, Secretary and a Director, at a purchase price of $0.001 per share, for aggregate proceeds of $2,000.

 

On October 6, 2009, we offered and sold 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Ivan Arredondo, our President, Secretary and a Director, at a purchase price of $0.001 per share, for aggregate proceeds of $2,000.

 

DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

 

Our Bylaws provide to the fullest extent permitted by law that our directors or officers, former directors and officers, and persons who act at our request as a director or officer of a body corporate of which we are a shareholder or creditor shall be indemnified by us. We believe that the indemnification provisions in our By-laws are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Company pursuant to provisions of the State of Nevada, the Company has been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

 

 

42

---

 

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We have filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-1, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the securities offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of the registration statement, does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Commission. For further information with respect to us and the securities offered by this prospectus, reference is made to the registration statement. We do not file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and we will not otherwise be subject to the proxy rules. The registration statement and other information may be read and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission.

INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

No expert or counsel named in this prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this prospectus or having given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering of the common stock was employed on a contingency basis, or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries. Nor was any such person connected with the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, or employee.

 

The financial statements included in this prospectus and in the registration statement have been audited by Goldman Accounting Services CPAS, PLLC, and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

 

The validity of the issuance of the common stock hereby will be passed upon for us by Law Offices of Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC. 

 

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

Goldman Accounting Services CPAS, PLLC, is our registered independent public registered accounting firm. There have not been any changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure or any other matter.

 

 

43

---

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Our audited financial statements for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are included herewith.

 

		Page
Audited Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-2
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 and 2012			F-3
Statements of Operations for the Years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and from Inception on September 14, 2009 through March 31, 2013			F-4
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity from Inception on September 14, 2009 through March 31, 2013			F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and from Inception on September 14, 2009 through March 31, 2013			F-6
Notes to the Financial Statements			F-7

 

 

F-1

---

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Madison Ventures Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Madison Ventures Inc. (the “Company” – An Exploration Stage Company) as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended and for the period September 14, 2009 (date of inception) to March 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Madison Ventures Inc. as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period September 14, 2009 (date of inception) to March 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, these conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

 

/s/ Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC
Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC
Suffern, NY
May 20, 2013

 

 

F-2

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

 

		March 31,				March 31,
		2013				2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash		$	32,164			$	37,070
Total current assets			32,164				37,070
Mineral Claim			19,984				14,984
Total assets		$	52,148			$	52,054
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Deferred mineral option		$	-			$	14,986
Total current liabilities			-				14,986
Total Liabilities			-				14,986
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock: 75,000,000 shares authorized of $0.001 par value;
6,850,000 and 6,650,000 shares issued and outstanding as of
March 31, 2013 and 2012			6,850				6,650
Additional paid-in capital			50,650				30,850
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage			(5,352	)			(432	)
Total shareholders' equity			52,148				37,068
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity		$	52,148			$	52,054

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

 

 

F-3

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

 

		Years Ended March 31,								Period from September 14, 2009 (Inception) to March 31,
		2013				2012				2013
Operating costs:
Mineral property exploration consulting fees		$	4,867			$	-			$	4,867
Other general & administrative expenses			65				24				564
Total operating costs			4,932				24				5,431
Other income (expenses)
Interest income			26				37				95
Interest (expense)			(14	)			(2	)			(16	)
Total other income (expenses)			12				35				79
Net (loss) income		$	(4,920	)		$	11			$	(5,352	)
Loss per common share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.00	)		$	(0.00	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted			6,661,096				6,650,000

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

 

 

F-4

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

 

														Accumulated
														deficit
						Common				Additional				during
		Common				stock				paid-in				exploration
		stock				amount				capital				stage				Total
Balance, September 14, 2009 (inception)			-			$	-			$	-			$	-			$	-
Shares issued to founders for cash			5,000,000				5,000				-				-				5,000
Shares issued for cash			1,250,000				1,250				11,250				-				12,500
Net loss, March 31, 2010			-				-				-				(14	)			(14	)
Balance, March 31, 2010			6,250,000				6,250				11,250				(14	)			17,486
Shares issued for cash			400,000				400				19,600				-				20,000
Net loss, March 31, 2011															(429	)			(429	)
Balance, March 31, 2011			6,650,000				6,650				30,850				(443	)			37,057
Net income, March 31, 2012			-				-				-				11				11
Balance, March 31, 2012			6,650,000				6,650				30,850				(432	)			37,068
Shares issued for cash			200,000				200				19,800				-				20,000
Net loss, March 31, 2013			-				-				-				(4,920	)			(4,920	)
Balance, March 31, 2013			6,850,000			$	6,850			$	50,650			$	(5,352	)		$	52,148

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

 

 

F-5

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

 

		For the Years Ended March 31,								Period from September 14, 2009 (Inception) to March 31,
		2013				2012				2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income		$	(4,920	)		$	11			$	(5,352	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Deferred mineral option			(14,986	)			14,986				-
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities			(19,906	)			14,997				(5,352	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of mineral claim			(5,000	)			(14,984	)			(19,984	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities			(5,000	)			(14,984	)			(19,984	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock issuances			20,000				-				57,500
Net cash provided by financing activities			20,000				-				57,500
Net (decrease) increase in cash			(4,906	)			13				32,164
Cash, beginning of the period			37,070				37,057				-
Cash, end of the period		$	32,164			$	37,070			$	32,164
Non-cash investing and financing activities		$	-			$	-			$	-
Supplement cash flow disclosure:
Interest paid		$	16			$	-			$	16
Income tax paid		$	-			$	-			$	-

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

 

 

F-6

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

As of March 31, 2013

 

1.      Nature of operations

Madison Ventures Inc. (“Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada as a for-profit company on September 14, 2009 and established a fiscal year end of March 31. The Company is an Exploration Stage Company, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification TM (the “Codification”) topic 915 “Development Stage Entities”. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties. The Company has no revenues and limited operating history.

The Company is in the process of evaluating its properties and has not yet determined whether these properties contain reserves that are economically recoverable. The success of the Company and the recoverability of the amounts shown for mineral properties are dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete exploration and development of the reserves, and upon future profitable production or proceeds from disposition of the properties.

2.      Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of Presentation

The Company's financial statements are presented in United States dollars and are prepared using the accrual method of accounting which conforms to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company anticipates future losses in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company’s operating expenditure plan for the following twelve months will require cash of approximately $65,000. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and from the issuance of common shares.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods presented. The Company is required to make judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, deferred income tax asset valuations and loss contingences. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although, we believe our judgments and estimates are appropriate, actual future results may be different; if different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, the results could be materially different from our reported results.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Codification topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments when it is practicable to estimate that value. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 approximate their respective fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

 

F-7

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

As of March 31, 2013

 

2.      Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Mineral Properties

Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized in accordance with Codification topic 930 “Extractive Activities - Mining”. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property are capitalized. To date the Company has not established any reserves on its mineral properties.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-Lived assets, such as property and equipment, mineral properties, and purchased intangibles with finite lives (subject to amortization), are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable in accordance with Codification topic 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment”. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of its estimated useful life.

Recoverability of assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by an asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. The estimated fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. Any impairment in value is recognized as an expense in the period when the impairment occurs. The Company’s management has considered the conditions outlined in Codification topic 360 and has concluded no impairment of the $19,984 mineral claim acquisition costs has taken place for the year ended March 31, 2013.

Rehabilitation Provisions

The Company is subject to various government laws and regulations relating to environmental disturbances which are caused by exploration and evaluation activities. The Company will record the present value for the estimated costs of legal and constructive obligations required to restore the exploration sites in the period in which the obligation is incurred. The nature of the rehabilitation activities includes restoration, reclamation and re-vegetation of the affected exploration sites. The Company has determined that there are no rehabilitation provisions at March 31, 2013.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided in accordance with Codification topic 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires an asset and liability approach for the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Current income tax expense (benefit) is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable (receivable) for the current year. A deferred tax asset and/or liability is computed for both the expected future impact of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred income tax expense is generally the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset and liability. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be “more likely than not” realized in future tax returns. Tax rate changes and changes in tax laws are reflected in income in the period such changes are enacted.

 

 

F-8

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

As of March 31, 2013

 

2.      Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Uncertain Tax Positions

Codification topic 740 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes is addressed by a two-step method of first evaluating whether a tax position has met a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and second, measuring that tax position to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with Codification topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” for the periods presented. Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share has not been presented because there are no dilutive items. Diluted earnings loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive stock options, warrants, and convertible debt are converted or exercised by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Options, warrants and/or convertible debt will have a dilutive effect, during periods of net profit, only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise or conversion price of the items.

Share-based Compensation

Codification topic 718 “Stock Compensation” requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements and establishes fair value as the measurement objective for share-based payment transactions with employees and acquired goods or services from non-employees. The codification also provides guidance on valuing and expensing these awards, as well as disclosure requirements of these equity arrangements. The Company adopted the codification upon creation of the company and will expense share based costs in the period incurred. The Company has not adopted a stock option plan or completed a share-based transaction; accordingly no stock-based compensation has been recorded to date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangibles asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impairs, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification subtopic 350-30, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The Company elected early adoption of this update and it had no impact on its financial statements.

 

 

F-9

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

As of March 31, 2013

 

3.      Mineral claim

 

On March 3, 2012, the Company entered into a Revised and Restated Mineral Property Option Agreement with 3 individuals (the “Optionors”) for an exclusive and irrevocable three year option to acquire a 100% undivided interest in three contiguous unpatented mining claims comprising 34 units (the “Claim” or the “Property”) situated in the Thunder Bay Mining Division in the province on Ontario, Canada (the “Agreement”). The option payments aggregating $30,000 (U.S. Dollars) (the “Option Price”) are due: i) $15,000 upon signing but deferred for eight months, ii) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2013, iii) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2014, and iv) $5,000 on or before March 3, 2015 (the “Option Payments”). During the term of the Agreement the Company is granted free and unrestricted access and use of the Property to act as the operator of the Property with the right to bring buildings, plant, equipment, machinery, tools, appliances and supplies onto the Property. The Optionors hold title to the Property until the full payment of the Option Price. Upon full payment of the Option Price the Optionors will deliver a duly executed transfer of mining claims in respect of the Property to transfer a 100% undivided interest in the Property to the Company free and clear of all encumbrances except for a retained net smelter return royalty (the “NSR”). The NSR is a 2% royalty paid within 30 days of each calendar month calculated, as defined, from gross Property revenues less permissible deductions. The Company has the right, at any time, to reduce the NSR to a 1% royalty by a One Million Dollar payment to the Optionors.

If the Company terminates the Agreement it is responsible to remove all buildings, plant, equipment, machinery, tools, appliances and supplies that it brought onto the Property not later than twelve months after termination of the Agreement unless arrangements are made with the Optionors to retain some or all of the items brought onto the Property.

The Company deferred the first option payment for an eight month term and made the $15,000 payment on October 27, 2012. Upon execution of the Agreement, the Company recorded the first option payment net of imputed interest as $14,984 and accrued the imputed interest ratably over the period of deferral. Annually the Company has the option to retain the mineral claim and make the next contractual Option Payment or to terminate the Agreement. The Company made the March 3, 2013 Option Payment on March 1, 2013. The aggregate total of $19,984 is included in the mineral claim as of March 31, 2013.

4.      Income taxes

Due to the Company’s net loss position from inception on September 14, 2009 to March 31, 2013, there was no provision for income taxes recorded. As a result of the Company’s losses to date, there exists doubt as to the ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets. Accordingly, a valuation allowance equal to the total deferred tax assets has been recorded at March 31, 2013 and 2012.

The components of net deferred tax assets are as follows:

		March 31,				March 31,
		2013				2012
Net operating loss carry-forward		$	5,352			$	432
Effective tax rate			34	%			34	%
Deferred tax asset		$	1,820			$	147
Less: Valuation allowance			(1,820	)			(147	)
Net deferred tax asset		$	-			$	-

The Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $5,352 and $432 at March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which may be available to offset future taxable income and which, if not used, begin to expire in 2027. Utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards may be subject to substantial annual limitations due to the ownership change limitations provided by Section 381 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating loss carry forwards before utilization

 

 

F-10

---

 

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

As of March 31, 2013

 

5.      Capital stock

The Company’s capitalization is 75,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share, with 6,850,000 and 6,650,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company has not granted any stock options and has not recorded any stock-based compensation.

6.      Stock issuances

On October 6, 2009, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to each of two Directors at $0.001 per share for cash proceeds of $2,500 from each Director.

On October 27, 2009, pursuant to the terms of seven stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 350,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On November 12, 2009, pursuant to the terms of nine stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 450,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On February 23, 2010, pursuant to the terms of seven stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 350,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On March 26, 2010, pursuant to the terms of two stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On April 22, 2010, pursuant to the terms of five stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.05 per share for cash proceeds of $2,000 from each subscriber.

On May 28, 2010, pursuant to the terms of five stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.05 per share for cash proceeds of $2,000 from each subscriber.

During March 2013, pursuant to the terms of four stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.10 per share for cash proceeds of $5,000 from each subscriber.

7.      Subsequent events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements were issued.

 

 

F-11

---

 

 

[OUTSIDE BACK COVER PAGE]

 

PROSPECTUS

 

MADISON VENTURES INC.

 

1,850,000 SHARES OF

 

COMMON STOCK

 

TO BE SOLD BY CURRENT SHAREHOLDERS

 

We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to give you written information other than this prospectus or to make representations as to matters not stated in this prospectus. You must not rely on unauthorized information. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities or a solicitation of your offer to buy the securities in any jurisdiction where that would not be permitted or legal. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sales made hereunder after the date of this prospectus shall create an implication that the information contained herein nor the affairs of the Issuer have not changed since the date hereof.

 

Until __________, 2013 (90 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that effect transactions in these shares of common stock may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

 

THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS ___________, 2013

 

 

44

---

 

 

PART II - INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

The following table sets forth the estimated expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered hereby. All such expenses will be borne by the Company; none shall be borne by any selling security holders

Item		Amount ($)
SEC Registration Fee		$	25.23
Transfer Agent Fees			1,000.00
Legal Fees			5,000.00
Accounting Fees			5,000.00
Printing Costs			500.00
Miscellaneous			1,000.00
TOTAL		$	12,525.23

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

 

The Company’s Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation provide that we shall, to the full extent permitted by the Nevada General Business Corporation Law, as amended from time to time (the “Nevada Corporate Law”), indemnify all of our directors and officers. Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Corporate Law provides in part that a corporation shall have the power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe her conduct was unlawful.

 

Similar indemnity is authorized for such persons against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred in defense or settlement of any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and provided further that (unless a court of competent jurisdiction otherwise provides) such person shall not have been adjudged liable to the corporation. Any such indemnification may be made only as authorized in each specific case upon a determination by the stockholders or disinterested directors that indemnification is proper because the indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct. Under our Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation, the indemnitee is presumed to be entitled to indemnification and we have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption. Where an officer or a director is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action referred to above, we must indemnify him against the expenses which such officer or director actually or reasonably incurred. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

 

II-1

---

 

 

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

 

Within the past two years we have issued and sold the following securities without registration.

 

On October 6, 2009, we issued, pursuant to the terms of a stock subscription agreement, 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Art Kerry, our President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director, at a purchase price of $0.0001 per share, for aggregate proceeds of $2,500.

 

On October 6, 2009, we issued, pursuant to the terms of a stock subscription agreement, 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Ivan Arredondo, our President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director, at a purchase price of $0.0001 per share, for aggregate proceeds of $2,500.

On October 27, 2009, pursuant to the terms of seven stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 350,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On November 12, 2009, pursuant to the terms of nine stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 450,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On February 23, 2010, pursuant to the terms of seven stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 350,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On March 26, 2010, pursuant to the terms of two stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $500 from each subscriber.

On April 22, 2010, pursuant to the terms of five stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.05 per share for cash proceeds of $2,000 from each subscriber.

On May 28, 2010, pursuant to the terms of five stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.05 per share for cash proceeds of $2,000 from each subscriber.

During March 2013, pursuant to the terms of four stock subscription agreements the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.10 per share for cash proceeds of $5,000 from each subscriber.

 

All of the foregoing offerings were made to non-U.S. persons, offshore of the U.S., with no directed selling efforts in the U.S., where offering restrictions were implemented in transactions pursuant to the exclusion from registration provided by Rule 903(b)(3) of Regulation S of the Securities Act.

 

 

II-2

---

 

 

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

The following exhibits are filed as part of this registration statement:

Exhibit		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Registrant
3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant
5.1		Opinion of Law Offices of Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC, regarding the legality of the securities being registered
10.1		Mineral Property Option Agreement, dated March 3, 2013, by and between Registrant, on the one hand, and Brian Fowler, William Roberts and Jason Shaver on the other hand
23.1		Consent of Law Offices of Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC (included in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2		Consent of Goldman Accounting Services CPAS, PLLC
23.3		Consent of Caitlin Jeffs, P. Geo.

 

UNDERTAKINGS

 

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:

 

(a)(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales of securities are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:

 

(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

 

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) (ss.230.424(b) of this chapter) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.

 

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

 

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

 

II-3

---

 

 

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

 

(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:

 

(i) If the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

 

(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

 

(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

 

(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

 

(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or our securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

 

(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the provisions above, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.

 

In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

II-4

---

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-1 and has authorized this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in Queretaro, Mexico, on the 22nd day of May, 2013.

 

		MADISON VENTURES INC. (Registrant)
	By:	/s/ Art Kerry
	Name:	Art Kerry
	Title:	President, Secretary and Treasurer
		(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Art Kerry, as her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Madison Ventures Inc., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, grant unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the foregoing, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or her substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated.

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Art Kerry		President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director		May 22, 2013
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

/s/ Ivan Arredondo		President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director		May 22, 2013
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

45

---

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Registrant
3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant
5.1		Opinion of Law Offices of Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC, regarding the legality of the securities being registered
10.1		Mineral Property Option Agreement, dated March 3, 2013, by and between Registrant, on the one hand, and Brian Fowler, William Roberts and Jason Shaver on the other hand
23.1		Consent of Law Offices of Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC (included in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2		Consent of Goldman Accounting Services CPAS, PLLC
23.3		Consent of Caitlin Jeffs, P. Geo.

 

 

46

---