ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Revance is a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative aesthetic and therapeutic offerings. Revance’s portfolio includes DAXXIFY® (DaxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm) for injection and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers in the U.S. Revance has also partnered with Viatris to develop a biosimilar to onabotulinumtoxinA for injection and Fosun to commercialize DAXXIFY® in China.
Key 2023 Developments
Revance Aesthetics
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we generated $224.9 million in revenue from the sale of our Products and our Services. As of December 31, 2023, we had over 7,000 aesthetic accounts across our Products business, and of those accounts, over 3,000 accounts ordered DAXXIFY®.
DAXXIFY®
In September 2022, we received DAXXIFY® GL Approval. DAXXIFY® is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and neuromuscular blocking agent indicated for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with corrugator and/or procerus muscle activity in adult patients.
Following DAXXIFY® GL Approval, we trained a group of faculty members on DAXXIFY® as part of PrevU, our early experience program for the product, which we initiated in December 2022. PrevU focused on providing practices with product education, tools for practice integration, and the opportunity to gain real-world clinical insights for DAXXIFY® with the goal of optimizing aesthetic outcomes. We completed the PrevU program in March 2023, which was followed by the targeted commercial launch of DAXXIFY®. Based on real-world learnings and customer feedback, in September 2023, we introduced new pricing for DAXXIFY®, which priced the product to be more competitive with BOTOX®. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized $84.0 million in product revenue from the sale of DAXXIFY®.
RHA® Collection of Dermal Fillers
In July 2023, the FDA approved the expansion of RHA® 4’s label to include cannula use. In October, the FDA approved Teoxane’s PMA to expand the indication for RHA 3® to include injection into the vermillion body, vermillion border and oral commissure for lip augmentation and lip fullness in adults aged 22 years and older. RHA® 3 was previously approved for the correction of moderate to severe dynamic wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds. The Company anticipates launching the new indication in mid-year 2024.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized $128.6 million in product revenue from the sale of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers.
Revance Therapeutics
In August 2023, the FDA approved DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults, and in September 2023, we initiated PrevU, our early experience program for the product. As with our early experience program for aesthetics, PrevU focuses on providing practices with product education, tools for practice integration, and the opportunity to gain real-world clinical insights for DAXXIFY® with the goal of optimizing therapeutic outcomes. As of the date of this Report, coverage for DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia has been secured for more than 140 million commercial lives, which includes 25 of the top 30 payors in the country, representing over 50% of commercial lives covered. In January 2024, the Company received a permanent J-Code for DAXXIFY®. We expect the commercial launch to begin in mid-year 2024.
CMO Partnerships
In March 2023, the FDA approved our PAS submission for the ABPS manufacturing facility. Following approval, the ABPS manufacturing facility began serving as our primary commercial drug product supply source for DAXXIFY®. In February 2024, we entered into an amendment to the ABPS Services Agreement, which extended the term of the ABPS Services Agreement through December 31, 2027.
Fosun Partnership
In April and July 2023, the NMPA accepted Fosun’s BLA for DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the improvement of glabellar lines and treatment of cervical dystonia, respectively. The anticipated approvals for both indications are expected in 2024.
Exit of the Fintech Platform Business
In September 2023, we commenced a plan to exit the Fintech Platform business because the significant costs and resources required to support OPUL® no longer aligned with the Company’s capital allocation priorities. The exit and restructuring activities predominantly included a reduction in OPUL® personnel headcount, the termination of OPUL® research and development activities and a reduction of outside services expenses related to OPUL®. Substantially all payment processing activities for OPUL® customers ended on January 31, 2024. We are currently in the process of completing activities to wind-down the remaining OPUL® platform operations, which we expect to be complete by March 31, 2024.
Disciplined Capital Allocation
In 2023, our capital resources were focused on supporting our strategic priorities, which included: (i) continuing to drive revenue growth by increasing adoption of DAXXIFY® and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers; (ii) initiating DAXXIFY® cervical dystonia PrevU program and pre-launch activities; and (iii) maximizing supply chain efficiencies by leveraging and scaling commercial production of DAXXIFY® through ABPS. To align our operations with our capital allocation priorities, the Company made the decision to exit its Fintech Platform business. We will continue to assess expense management and the timing of capital allocation measures as it relates to our therapeutics pipeline activities and international regulatory investments for DAXXIFY®.
For additional information, see Part II, Item 7. “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Our Strategy
Our objective is to set a new standard in healthcare by elevating patient and physician experiences through the development, acquisition and commercialization of innovative aesthetic and therapeutic offerings, including DAXXIFY® and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers.
Key elements of our strategy are:
•We aim to leverage the unique formulation and clinical profile of DAXXIFY® to build valuable aesthetic and therapeutic franchises.
•We aim to grow market share by utilizing our innovative and differentiated portfolio of Products to appeal to consumers seeking elevated aesthetic outcomes.
•We aim to leverage DAXXIFY® to pursue a therapeutics program that will advance the treatment of multiple indications, with a current focus on muscle movement disorders, including cervical dystonia and upper limb spasticity. We also plan to evaluate our pipeline for other indications, such as migraine.
•We have and will continue to selectively evaluate partnerships, distribution opportunities, joint development agreements and acquisitions to expand our aesthetic and therapeutic franchises and enhance our competitive position:
◦Our Teoxane partnership enabled us to enter the U.S. dermal filler market and has provided the foundation for DAXXIFY® and potential future product commercialization.
◦We have the potential to enter the second largest neuromodulator market, China, as a result of our Fosun License Agreement.
◦We have entered into the Viatris Agreement, which provides us with the potential to participate in the short-acting neuromodulator market.
The Botulinum Toxin Opportunity
Botulinum toxin is a protein and neurotoxin produced by clostridium botulinum. Since 1989, botulinum toxin has been used to treat a variety of aesthetic and therapeutic indications in the U.S. and globally. Botulinum toxin blocks neuromuscular transmission by binding to receptor sites on motor or sympathetic nerve terminals, entering the nerve terminals, and inhibiting the release of acetylcholine. This inhibition occurs as the neurotoxin cleaves SNAP-25, a protein integral to the successful docking and release of acetylcholine from vesicles situated within nerve endings. When injected intramuscularly at therapeutic doses, botulinum toxin produces partial chemical denervation of the muscle resulting in a localized reduction in muscle activity. Throughout this Report, we use neuromodulators to refer to botulinum toxins and neurotoxins.
According to DRG, the global market opportunity for neuromodulators was estimated to be $8.1 billion in 2023 compared to $7.4 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach approximately $12.0 billion by 2028, registering a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 8.1% from 2023 to 2028. DRG estimates that the market opportunity for aesthetic indications and therapeutic indications in 2023 is approximately 60% and 40%, respectively. We expect continued growth to be driven by demographics, changing lifestyle, new indications and product launches in new geographies.
For information on competition we face in these markets, please see “—Product Competition” below.
The Opportunity for Neuromodulators for Aesthetic Indications
Injectable neuromodulator treatments are the single largest cosmetic procedure in the U.S. and globally. In the U.S., neuromodulators have been approved to treat three aesthetic indications, glabellar lines, forehead lines and LCLs. According to DRG, in 2023, 16.1 million neuromodulator aesthetic procedures were performed in the U.S. and 49 million neuromodulator aesthetic procedures were performed globally, which represents an increase of 8.2% and 8.65%, respectively, over 2022. Also, according to DRG, the aesthetic neuromodulator market opportunity was estimated to be $2.8 billion in the U.S. and $4.9 billion globally in 2023, compared to $2.5 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively, in 2022. The aesthetic neuromodulator market is projected to reach approximately $4.4 billion in the U.S. and $7.3 billion globally by 2028, registering five-year compounded annual growth rates of approximately 9.2% and 8.3%, respectively, from 2023 to 2028.
We believe that we are positioned to take advantage of this growing market opportunity due to the performance profile of DAXXIFY®, which has been shown to include long duration, fast-onset and the appearance of improved skin quality. In our SAKURA Phase 3 clinical program for the treatment of glabellar lines, DAXXIFY® demonstrated a median time to the loss of none or mild wrinkle severity of 24 weeks (6 months) and a median time to return to baseline wrinkle severity of approximately 28 weeks (7 months), as documented on the prescribing information. According to the prescribing information from other neuromodulators on the market, median duration of effect of these products ranges between three to four months. We believe that DAXXIFY®’s attributes will provide more satisfaction and value to consumers, and ultimately drive increased adoption of DAXXIFY®.
The Opportunity for Neuromodulators for Therapeutic Indications
In the U.S., neuromodulators have been approved for the treatment of cervical dystonia, upper limb spasticity (adult and pediatric), lower limb spasticity, chronic migraine headache, urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, blepharospasm, strabismus, hyperhidrosis and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (adult and pediatric). In addition, neuromodulator products are being evaluated in clinical trials for other therapeutic indications, including acne, rosacea, skin and wound healing, scar reduction, hair loss, major depressive disorder, atrial fibrillation and several musculoskeletal and neurological conditions.
We are currently pursuing the commercialization of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia and the development of DAXXIFY® for upper limb spasticity because we believe there is opportunity to improve injectable neuromodulator outcomes and overall health system costs in muscle movement disorders. Muscle movement disorders are neurological conditions that affect a person’s ability to control muscle activity in one or more areas of the body. Cervical dystonia is a painful and disabling chronic condition in which the neck muscles contract involuntarily, causing abnormal movements and awkward posture of the head and neck. Cervical dystonia affected approximately 60,000 people in the U.S. According to DRG, the U.S. market opportunity for cervical dystonia in 2023 was approximately $372.8 million and is expected to grow to approximately $521.2 million by 2028, registering a five-year compounded annual growth rate of approximately 6.93% from 2023 to 2028.
Muscle spasticity happens after the body’s nervous system has been damaged, most commonly by a stroke, trauma or disease. Muscle spasticity can be painful and may have a significant effect on a person’s quality of life. Certain tasks, like getting dressed or bathing, become difficult, and a person’s self-esteem may be affected by an abnormal posture. Spasticity affected approximately 500,000 people in the U.S. and approximately 12 million people globally. According to DRG, the global spasticity market in 2023 was approximately $906 million and is expected to grow to $1.4 billion by 2028.
Although currently approved neuromodulators have demonstrated safety and efficacy in clinical trials for the treatment of muscle movement disorders, such neuromodulator injections must be repeated every three to four months. According to the peer-reviewed article Patient Perspectives on the Therapeutic Profile of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Cervical Dystonia, published in the Journal of Neurology in 2020, out of cervical dystonia patients surveyed, 88% of patients treated with botulinum neurotoxin type A products experienced symptom reemergence between treatment sessions, with a mean time to reemergence of approximately 10.5 weeks. In addition, most botulinum neurotoxin type A labels recommend waiting at least 12 weeks prior to re-treatment. We believe there is a significant need for a long-lasting injectable neuromodulator, which has the potential to offer consumers and payors more value by reducing the frequency of visits while also allowing consumers to achieve more durable symptom relief between injection cycles. We believe that DAXXIFY® has the potential to provide these benefits. In 2021, we completed the ASPEN-1 Phase 3 clinical program for the treatment of cervical dystonia and the JUNIPER Phase 2 clinical trial for the treatment of upper limb spasticity. In the ASPEN-1 Phase 3 clinical trial, DAXXIFY® demonstrated a median duration of effect of 24.0 weeks in one treatment group and 20.3 weeks in another treatment group. In the JUNIPER Phase 2 clinical trial, DAXXIFY® demonstrated a median duration of at least 24 weeks across all three doses. See “—Our Product — DAXXIFY for Therapeutic Indications.” The Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Opportunity
Dermal fillers are injected into the superficial and deep layers of the skin to restore volume, smooth lines, provide facial lift and contour, plump the lips or improve the appearance of facial scars commonly caused by acne. Hyaluronic acid dermal fillers represent approximately 91% of the total U.S. dermal filler market, and according to the 2022 ASPS, hyaluronic acid dermal fillers were the second most common aesthetic injectable procedure in United States in 2022. Hyaluronic acid is naturally found in the body, primarily in the skin, joints and connective tissue. With age, human skin loses its ability to produce hyaluronic acid, resulting in the loss of volume, firmness and elasticity. Hyaluronic acid dermal fillers are manufactured from synthesized hyaluronic acid cross-linked to significantly enhance durability in the skin. These products can restore lost volume for six to 12 months or longer before the body gradually and naturally absorbs the hyaluronic acid. Most hyaluronic acid dermal fillers also contain lidocaine to help minimize discomfort during and after treatment.
DRG estimated that 3.3 million dermal filler procedures were performed in the U.S. in 2023. According to DRG, the U.S. market opportunity for hyaluronic acid dermal fillers was estimated to be $1.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach approximately $2.1 billion by 2028, registering a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 7.5% from 2023 to 2028.
Access to the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers not only enables us to compete in the U.S. dermal filler market, but also supports the launch of DAXXIFY® and provides a foundation for other potential aesthetic product offerings. We believe there are long term revenue and cost synergy opportunities with neuromodulators and hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. We believe our ability to offer a comprehensive aesthetics portfolio, including DAXXIFY® and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, positions us to compete with established competitors.
For information on competition we face in this market, please see “—Product Competition” below.
Product Pipeline Summary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product/Product Candidate | | Indication | | Phase |
DAXXIFY® | | Glabellar lines | | FDA approved September 2022 |
|
DAXXIFY® | | Cervical dystonia | | FDA approved August 2023 |
|
RHA® Redensity | | Perioral rhytids | | FDA approved December 2021 |
|
RHA® 2 | | Facial wrinkles and folds (such as nasolabial folds) | | FDA approved October 2017 |
|
RHA® 3 | | Facial wrinkles and folds (such as nasolabial folds | | FDA approved October 2017 |
| Vermillion body, vermillion border and oral commissure | | FDA approved January 2024 |
RHA® 4 | | Facial wrinkles and folds (such as nasolabial folds) | | FDA approved October 2017 |
|
DAXXIFY® | | Forehead lines, lateral canthal lines, upper facial lines | | Phase 2 completed |
|
DAXXIFY® | | Upper limb spasticity | | End of Phase 2 meeting with FDA completed Q4 2021 |
|
onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar | | N/A | | Pre-clinical |
|
Our Products
DAXXIFY®
DAXXIFY®, our first commercially approved product, is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and neuromuscular blocking agent indicated for the (i) temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with corrugator and/or procerus muscle activity in adult patients and (ii) treatment of cervical dystonia in adult patients. DAXXIFY® GL Approval was granted in the U.S. based on the results of the SAKURA Phase 3 clinical program in glabellar lines where DAXXIFY® demonstrated high response rates, long duration of effect and a safety profile consistent with other approved neuromodulator products. DAXXIFY® was also evaluated in Phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of UFLs, forehead lines and LCLs. DAXXIFY® CD Approval was granted in the U.S. based on the results of the ASPEN-1 and ASPEN OLS Phase 3 clinical program for the treatment of cervical dystonia where DAXXIFY® demonstrated durable symptom relief, long duration of effect and a safety profile consistent with other approved neuromodulator products. DAXXIFY® was also evaluated in Phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of additional therapeutic indications, including upper limb spasticity.
The DAXXIFY® formulation incorporates our proprietary stabilizing peptide excipient along with the other excipients: polysorbate-20, buffers and a sugar. DAXXIFY® is supplied as a lyophilized powder, which requires reconstitution with saline prior to injection. The highly positively charged peptide excipient has been shown to bind non-covalently to the daxibotulinumtoxinA molecule. The unique formulation of DAXXIFY® has enabled us to create a drug product without human serum albumin or animal-derived components, which are contained in all other FDA approved neuromodulator products.
Please see www.revance.com for the Full Prescribing Information including the Boxed Warning and Medication Guide for DAXXIFY®.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Aesthetic Indications
DAXXIFY® has been studied in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of glabellar lines and in Phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of UFL, forehead lines and LCL. For a summary of the DAXXIFY® aesthetics clinical program, please see our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines
Glabellar Lines, often called “frown lines,” are vertical lines that develop between the eyebrows and may appear as a single vertical line or as two or more lines. When one frowns, the muscles of the glabella contract causing vertical creases to form between the eyebrows. Neuromodulators are used to temporarily block the ability of nerves to trigger contraction of the injected muscle, inhibiting movement of the muscles that cause the frown lines, resulting in a smoother, more refreshed appearance. Current treatments include neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers, laser treatments and topical creams.
In December 2018, we completed a Phase 3 clinical program for glabellar lines, which included three studies: two 36-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled pivotal trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single administration of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adults (SAKURA Phase 1 and SAKURA Phase 2) and an 84-week, open-label safety trial designed to evaluate the long term safety of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adults following both single and repeat treatment administration (SAKURA Phase 3). Based on the results of the SAKURA clinical program, DAXXIFY® was approved for the temporary improvement of glabellar lines.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines
UFL is the name commonly given to the combination of the three most commonly treated facial areas with neuromodulators; specifically, glabellar lines, LCLs and forehead lines. In clinical practice, a large proportion of patients seek treatment in all three areas to address signs of aging.
In December 2020, we completed a multicenter, open-label Phase 2 trial for the treatment of the UFL to understand the safety and efficacy, including potential dosing and injection patterns, of DAXXIFY®, covering the UFL.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Forehead Lines
Forehead lines are produced by the action of the frontalis muscle, a large, thin, vertically-oriented muscle which lifts the eyebrows. The frontalis muscle serves as an antagonist to the glabellar musculature, a natural depressor that is responsible for frowning and associated eyebrow movement. As the eyebrow is considered the aesthetic center of the upper face, forehead lines can significantly impact the aesthetic appearance of the face, contribute to increased signs of aging and convey unwanted social signals. Current treatments include neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers, laser treatments and topical creams.
In June 2020, we completed a Phase 2 multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate the treatment of moderate or severe dynamic forehead lines in conjunction with treatment of the glabellar complex. The objective was to understand the potential dosing and injection patterns of DAXXIFY® in other areas of the upper face.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Lateral Canthal Lines
Crow’s feet or LCLs are the spider-like fine lines around the outside corners of the eyes that become more obvious when someone smiles. These lines (also referred to as periorbital wrinkles, laugh lines or smile lines), fan out across the skin from the outer corner of each eye. Repetitive motions, such as squinting and smiling, can lead to the increase of wrinkles and contribute to the severity and onset of crow’s feet. Age and exposure to sun also play significant roles in development of these lines, which can deepen over time. Current treatments include eye creams and moisturizers, topical tretinoins, neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers and laser treatments.
In June 2020, we completed a Phase 2 multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate the treatment of moderate or severe LCLs. The objective was to understand the potential dosing of DAXXIFY® in the lateral canthal area.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Therapeutic Indications
DAXXIFY® has been studied in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of cervical dystonia and Phase 2 studies for upper limb spasticity and plantar fasciitis. Although we previously evaluated DAXXIFY® for the treatment of plantar fasciitis, we are not currently pursuing the plantar fasciitis indication due to the results of the Phase 2 study. We will continue to evaluate development for other therapeutic indications, such as migraine, informed by the results of the commercialization of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia and preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by Revance and competitors.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
Cervical dystonia is a chronic neurologic disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions of the head, neck, and shoulders, resulting in pain, abnormal movements and/or postural changes. While not life-threatening, cervical dystonia can be painful and may have a significant effect on a person’s quality of life. The cause of cervical dystonia is often unknown, and treatment with a neuromodulator is the current standard of care.
In November 2021, we completed the ASPEN Phase 3 clinical program for the treatment of cervical dystonia. The ASPEN Phase 3 program included a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing two doses of DAXXIFY® (125 units and 250 units) to placebo designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single treatment of either 125 units or 250 units of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia (ASPEN-1) and a Phase 3, open-label, multi-center trial to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of repeat treatments of DAXXIFY® in adults with cervical dystonia (ASPEN-OLS). Based on the results of the ASPEN Phase 3 clinical program, DAXXIFY® was approved for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults in August 2023. For a summary of the DAXXIFY® ASPEN clinical program, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
Spasticity is a motor symptom characterized by rigidity, muscle tightness, joint stiffness, involuntary jerky movements, exaggeration of reflexes, unusual posture, abnormal positioning and muscle spasms and can affect the hands, fingers, wrists, arms, elbows or shoulders. Muscle spasticity happens after the body’s nervous system has been damaged, most commonly by a stroke or brain injury. While not life-threatening, spasticity can be painful and may have a significant effect on a person’s quality of life. Neuromodulators are one of several approved therapies for the treatment of adult upper limb spasticity. Other treatments include oral and intrathecal muscle relaxants, physical therapy, splints, casts & braces, electrical stimulation, and surgery.
In December 2018, we initiated the JUNIPER Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAXXIFY® for adults with moderate to severe upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury. In February 2021, we announced topline data from the JUNIPER Phase 2 trial. Subjects were assigned to one of three doses of DAXXIFY® (250 units, 375 units, or 500 units) or to placebo. The trial was originally designed to enroll 128 subjects. Due to COVID-19 challenges related to continued subject enrollment and the scheduling of in-person study visits, we made the decision in June 2020 to complete study enrollment at 83 subjects.
The study’s co-primary endpoints were improvement from baseline in the MAS and the PGIC score at Week 6. One co-primary endpoint was achieved in the 500-unit treatment group, which evaluated the change in the MAS score from baseline, with demonstration of a clinically meaningful and statistically significant reduction from baseline in muscle tone versus placebo (p=0.0488). Proof of concept was demonstrated with all three doses being numerically higher than placebo for the improvement in the MAS score. Statistical significance was not achieved on the second co-primary endpoint, however numerical improvement compared with placebo in all three doses on the PGIC assessment was achieved.
The study was designed to run for up to 36 weeks, with the co-primary measures: mean change from baseline in muscle tone measured with the MAS in the SMG of the elbow, wrist, or finger flexors at Week 6; and mean score of the PGIC at Week 6. The first 73 subjects, who were dosed before enrollment was paused in March due to the COVID-19 pandemic, were followed for up to 36 weeks, and the succeeding 10 subjects were followed up to Week 12.
On a key secondary endpoint, DAXXIFY® delivered a median duration of at least 24 weeks across all three doses. Duration of effect was defined as the time from injection (in weeks) until the loss of improvement as measured by the MAS (for the SMG) and the PGIC, or a request for retreatment by the subject.
All three doses of DAXXIFY® were generally safe and well tolerated with no increase in the incidence of adverse events observed in the higher dose treatment groups. The majority of treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.
The JUNIPER Phase 2 trial generated sufficient data for progression to a Phase 3 study and to inform our dosing strategy and design for our Phase 3 program. In October 2021, we concluded our end-of-Phase 2 meeting with the FDA, which informed the study design for our JUNIPER Phase 3 program in upper limb spasticity.
DAXXIFY® for the Treatment of Migraine
Migraine headache is a central nervous system disorder characterized as moderate to severe headache and often includes other symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. In 2019, migraine headache affected more than 37 million people in the U.S., of which, it is estimated that more than 3 million suffered from chronic migraine headache. Chronic migraine headache is both under treated and under diagnosed and is defined as more than fifteen headache days per month over a three-month period of which more than eight are migrainous, in the absence of medication overuse.
We continue to evaluate the timing of the initiation of migraine clinical trials.
Topical
We previously evaluated preclinically and clinically a topical program for indications currently served by neuromodulator treatments. A topical product presents several potential advantages over injectable treatments, including
painless topical administration, no bruising, ease of use and limited dependence on administration technique by injectors and other medical staff. We believe these potential advantages may improve the experience of consumers undergoing neuromodulator procedures and could make a topical product candidate suitable for multiple indications in the future. We may conduct additional preclinical work for a topical product candidate in therapeutic and aesthetic applications where neuromodulators have shown efficacy and are particularly well suited for injection-free treatments.
Our Strategic Collaborations
The RHA® Collection of Dermal Fillers
In January 2020, we entered into the Teoxane Agreement, as amended on September 2020, January 2021 and December 2022, pursuant to which Teoxane granted us the exclusive right to import, market, promote, sell and distribute Teoxane’s line of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid® dermal fillers, which include: (i) the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers and (ii) the RHA® Pipeline Products in the U.S., U.S. territories and possessions, in exchange for 2,500,000 shares of our common stock and certain other commitments by us.
In September 2020, we launched the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, which initially included RHA® 2, RHA® 3 and RHA® 4. In July 2022, we added RHA® Redensity to the portfolio of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. In July 2023, the FDA approved the expansion of RHA 4’s label to include cannula use.
The RHA® Collection of dermal fillers represents the latest advancements in hyaluronic acid filler technology. The dermal filler collection is created using a novel and gentle manufacturing process called preserved network technology that has few chemical modifications. The PNT process helps preserve the natural structure of the hyaluronic acid, allowing it to more closely mimic the natural hyaluronic acid found in the skin. The result is a hyaluronic acid dermal filler that is easy to inject and gives consumers a natural look.
The Teoxane Agreement is effective for a term of ten years from product launch and may be extended for a two-year period upon the mutual agreement of the parties. In September 2020, we amended the Teoxane Agreement to memorialize a revised launch date from April to September as a result of delays related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In January 2021 and December 2022, we amended the Teoxane Agreement by amending the innovation plan annex and quality agreement annex, respectively. Pursuant to the Teoxane Agreement, we are required to meet certain minimum purchase obligations and certain minimum expenditure requirements, which are discussed in Part IV, Item 15. “Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules—Notes to consolidated financial statements— Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies.” If Teoxane pursues regulatory approval for certain new indications or filler technologies, including innovations with respect to existing products in the U.S., we will be subject to certain specified cost-sharing arrangements for third party expenses incurred in achieving regulatory approval for such products. We also have a right of first negotiation with respect to any cosmeceutical products that Teoxane wishes to distribute in the U.S, and Teoxane will have a right of first negotiation in connection with the distribution of DAXXIFY® for aesthetic use outside the U.S. and U.S. territories where Teoxane has an affiliate. OnabotulinumtoxinA Biosimilar
We entered into the Viatris Agreement in February 2018, under which Revance and Viatris are collaborating exclusively, on a worldwide basis (excluding Japan), to develop, manufacture, and commercialize a biosimilar to the branded biologic product (onabotulinumtoxinA) marketed as BOTOX®. In February 2019, we had a BIAM with the FDA and Viatris on a proposed onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar product candidate. Based on the FDA’s feedback, Revance and Viatris believe that a 351(k) pathway for the development of an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar is viable.
In August 2019, we entered into the Viatris Amendment which, among other things, extended the period of time for Viatris to make the Continuation Decision as to whether to continue the biosimilar development program beyond the initial development plan and the BIAM. In accordance with the Viatris Amendment, Viatris was required to notify us of the Continuation Decision on or before the later of (i) April 30, 2020 or (ii) 30 calendar days from the date that we provide Viatris with certain deliverables. Pursuant to the Viatris Amendment, Viatris agreed to pay us an additional $5.0 million above the previously agreed non-refundable upfront payment of $25.0 million with contingent payments of up to $100.0 million, in the aggregate, upon the achievement of specified clinical and regulatory milestones, tiered sales milestones of up to $225.0 million, and royalties on sales of the biosimilar in the Viatris territories previously disclosed from the Viatris
Agreement. In June 2020, we announced that Viatris provided us its written notice of its Continuation Decision and paid us a $30 million milestone payment in connection with the Continuation Decision. We began the continuation phase of the onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar program and are moving forward with characterization and product development work, followed by an anticipated filing of an IND with the FDA. Viatris has paid us an aggregate of $60 million in non-refundable fees as of December 31, 2023.
Fosun License Agreement
In December 2018, we entered into the Fosun License Agreement with Fosun, whereby we granted Fosun the exclusive rights to develop and commercialize DAXXIFY® in the Fosun Territory and certain sublicense rights. Fosun has paid us non-refundable fees upfront and other payments totaling $41.0 million before foreign withholding taxes as of December 31, 2023. We are also eligible to receive (i) additional remaining contingent payments of up to$219.5 million upon the achievement of certain milestones based on first calendar year net sales and tiered royalty payments in low double digits to high teen percentages on annual net sales. The royalty percentages are subject to reduction in the event that (i) we do not have any valid and unexpired patent claims that cover the product in the Fosun Territory, (ii) biosimilars of the product are sold in the Fosun Territory or (iii) Fosun needs to pay compensation to third parties to either avoid patent infringement or market the product in the Fosun Territory.
In April and July 2023, the NMPA accepted Fosun’s BLA for DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the improvement of glabellar lines and treatment of cervical dystonia, respectively. The anticipated approvals for both indications are expected in 2024. We are entitled to receive additional milestone payments from Fosun upon approval of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in China, as well as milestones based on future commercial sales in Fosun territories.
Manufacturing and Supply Chain
DAXXIFY® Manufacturing
Drug Substance
In our northern California manufacturing facility, we manufacture and perform testing for the botulinum toxin, the active pharmaceutical ingredient in our bulk drug substance. Manufacture of the drug substance for DAXXIFY® is based on microbial fermentation followed by product recovery and purification steps. The process is entirely free of animal and human-derived materials and depends on standard raw materials available commercially. The process is scaled to support expected future commercial demand. Bulk drug substance is stable when stored under required conditions, which allows us to manage risk with reserves of drug substance and allows periodic drug substance production to replenish inventories as needed.
Drug Product
In March 2023, the FDA approved our PAS submission for the ABPS manufacturing facility. Following approval, the ABPS manufacturing facility began serving as our primary commercial drug product supply source for DAXXIFY®. Our northern California aseptic fill-and-finish manufacturing facility is available for commercial and clinical production of DAXXIFY® to support the development and commercialization of DAXXIFY® for the Fosun partnership. The manufacturing process consists of bulk compounding, liquid fill and freeze-drying to support acceptable shelf-life duration. We also perform testing for DAXXIFY® in our northern California facility and at the ABPS facility.
In March 2017, we entered into the ABPS Services Agreement, pursuant to which ABPS would serve as a supply source and provide drug product manufacturing services for us at its aseptic manufacturing facility in San Diego, California. Under the ABPS Services Agreement, until May 2022, we were subject to minimum purchase obligations of up to $30.0 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024. In May 2022, we amended a statement of work under the ABPS Services Agreement pursuant to which the minimum purchase obligations of $30.0 million per year were eliminated, and instead the minimum purchase obligations would be based on available manufacturing weeks and negotiated prior to the beginning of each year over the term of the agreement. In February 2024, we entered into the second amendment to the ABPS Services Agreement, which extended the term of the ABPS Services Agreement through December 31, 2027
and modified our remedies with respect to non-conforming products and delays. The minimum payments for the year ending December 31, 2024 have not been established.
In order to support the anticipated commercial demand and manage potential supply chain risks, we have also entered into an agreement with PCI, another third-party manufacturer. In April 2021, we entered into the PCI Supply Agreement, pursuant to which PCI would serve as a non-exclusive manufacturer and supplier of our products and product candidates. Pursuant to the PCI Supply Agreement, we will be responsible for an estimated $28 million in costs associated with the design, equipment procurement and validation and facilities-related costs, which are paid in accordance with a payment schedule based on the completion of specified milestones.
The initial term of the obligations underlying the PCI Supply Agreement is dependent upon the date of regulatory submission for the applicable product and may be sooner terminated by either party in accordance with the terms of the PCI Supply Agreement. The term of the PCI Supply Agreement may also be extended by mutual agreement of the parties. The PCI Supply Agreement also sets forth, among other things, the Company's purchase requirements, pricing and payment information, deliverables, timelines, milestones, payment schedules, manufacturing facility obligations and development of a drug manufacturing process. The parties would also enter into quality agreements and other supplements which detail the process and product specifications for the applicable Product. The PCI Supply Agreement also contains provisions relating to compliance with cGMPs and applicable laws and regulations, and to intellectual property, indemnification, confidentiality, representations and warranties, dispute resolution and other customary matters for an agreement of this kind.
We anticipate the potential approval of the PAS for the PCI manufacturing site in 2025.
Outsourced Components of Drug Product
We also contract with third parties for the manufacture of the additional components required for DAXXIFY®, including the manufacture of bulk peptide. We currently rely on a single source supplier for the development, manufacture and supply of peptide. To decrease the risk of an interruption to our drug supply, we maintain an inventory of peptide.
Supply of the RHA® Collection of Dermal Fillers
We are a distributor of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers and are not involved in the manufacturing process. We rely on Teoxane to supply us with the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
Sales and Marketing of our Aesthetics Portfolio
In August 2020, we became a commercial company with the launch of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers in the U.S., which included RHA® 2, RHA® 3 and RHA® 4. Since the initial launch of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, we have added RHA® Redensity to our portfolio offering as a part of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. In September 2022, we expanded our aesthetic Product portfolio to include DAXXIFY®.
We initiated the launch of DAXXIFY® in the U.S. in December 2022 by training a group of faculty members on the product as a part of PrevU, our early experience program for the product. PrevU focused on providing practices with product education, tools for practice integration, and the opportunity to gain real-world clinical insights with the goal of optimizing aesthetic outcomes. We completed the PrevU program in March 2023, which was followed by the targeted commercial launch of DAXXIFY®.
Based on real-world learnings and customer feedback, in September 2023, we introduced a new pricing strategy for DAXXIFY® that allows the product to be priced more competitively to BOTOX®. Revenue increased from $22.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 to $24.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2023, and the volume sold during the three months ended December 31, 2023 increased by 22% compared to the three months ended September 30, 2023. Further, the majority of total DAXXIFY® sales revenue for the three months ended September 30 and December 31, 2023 were attributable to reordering accounts.
We acquired HintMD in July of 2020, pursuant to which we commercialized the Fintech Platform. In September 2023, we commenced a plan to exit the Fintech Platform business and halted any additional commercialization activities for the Fintech Platform because the significant costs and resources required to support the Fintech Platform no longer aligned with the Company’s capital allocation priorities. As of January 31, 2024, we ceased substantially all payment processing activity.
Sales and Marketing of our Therapeutics Portfolio
In August 2023, the FDA approved DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults, which was followed by PrevU, our early experience program for the product. We have also begun to establish our commercial sales and marketing organization to support the launch of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia, with commercial launch expected to begin in mid-year 2024. Our therapeutics sales team will be supported by our marketing, market access and medical affairs teams. Our therapeutics sales and national account teams will initially target high volume cervical dystonia injectors in private practice, targeted academic medical centers, integrated delivery networks, and government accounts. As of the date of this Report, coverage for DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia has been secured for more than 140 million commercial lives, which includes 25 of the top 30 payors in the country, representing over 50% of commercial lives covered.
Distribution
We rely on one or more third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions related to the packaging, storage and distribution of DAXXIFY® and the storage and distribution of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. We recognize revenue from the sales of our Products once they are delivered to our customers. We rely on one third-party service provider to distribute our Products to our customers, which could expose us to shipping delays and delays in revenue recognition to the extent we experience a sudden loss of that third-party service provider or that third-party service provider’s operations are disrupted or impacted. See Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors—We generally rely on one third-party service provider for the distribution of our Products to our customers. If we experienced a sudden loss of our third-party distributor or such distributor experiences a disruption in its operations, it would affect the delivery of our Products to our customers, which could negatively impact our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations.” Seasonality
Sales of DAXXIFY® and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers have been subject to the impact of traditional seasonality in the aesthetic facial injectables market, which historically has experienced higher sales in the second and fourth calendar quarters as compared to the first and third calendar quarters.
Intellectual Property
Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our drug candidates, novel biological discoveries, drug development technology and other know-how, to operate without infringing on the proprietary or intellectual property rights of others and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary and intellectual property rights. We seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development and implementation of our business. We also rely on know-how, copyright, trademarks and trade secret laws, continuing technological innovation and potential in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position. Such protection is also maintained using confidential non-disclosure agreements. Protection of our technologies is important for us to offer our customers proprietary products unavailable from our competitors, and to exclude our competitors from using technology that we have developed. If competitors in our industry have access to the same technology, our competitive position may be adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2023, Revance and its subsidiaries held approximately 305 issued patents and approximately 124 pending patent applications, including foreign counterparts of U.S. patents and applications. 57 of our patents are issued in the U.S., with the rest issued in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, various countries in Europe, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea. In addition, we have pending patent applications in the U.S. as well as in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Europe, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines,
Singapore and South Korea. We will continue to pursue additional patent protection as well as take appropriate measures to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for our innovative technologies.
It is possible that our current patents, or patents which we may later acquire or develop, may be successfully challenged or invalidated in whole or in part. For example, in May 2019, our European Patent No. EP 2 490 986 B1 for “Methods and Systems For Purifying Non-Complexed Botulinum Neurotoxin” was opposed. At a hearing in June 2021, the Opposition Division granted amended claims in our patent. The opponent appealed our successful opposition defense to the Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office. We subsequently filed an appeal to preserve our ability to use all arguments throughout the appeal process. Following an Appeal Hearing in December 2023, the patent was upheld with the claims, as amended during the opposition, and the appeals were dismissed. In November 2022, Ipsen Biopharm Limited filed an Opposition in the European Patent Office against our European Patent No. EP 3 368 071 titled “Injectable botulinum toxin formulations and methods of use thereof having long duration of therapeutic or cosmetic effect.” We will vigorously defend this patent in the European Patent Office.
It is also possible that we may not obtain issued patents from our pending patent applications or for other inventions we seek to protect. Due to uncertainties inherent in prosecuting patent applications, sometimes patent applications are rejected and we subsequently abandon them. It is also possible that we may develop proprietary products or technologies in the future that are not patentable or that the patents of others will limit or altogether preclude our ability to do business. In addition, any patent issued to us, or any of our pending patent applications, may provide us with little or no competitive advantage, in which case we may abandon such patent, or patent applications, or license them to another entity. Please refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Intellectual Property” for more information.
Our registered U.S. trademarks include REVANCE®, DAXXIFY® and the Revance logo.
Product Competition
The pharmaceutical and medical device markets are highly competitive. Our competitors are engaged in the development, research, manufacture and marketing of healthcare products. While we believe that our innovative Products provide us with a competitive advantage, possible competitors may also have an ability to discover, develop, test and obtain regulatory approvals for products, as well as the ability to commercialize, market and promote approved products more effectively than us. Our competitors may be able to develop competing technologies and processes that compete more aggressively and sustain that competition over a longer period of time. Our technologies and Products may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances, products with longer duration or entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors. Additionally, our competitors have greater existing market share in the aesthetic market and long-standing consumer loyalty programs and sales contracts with large customers and further established business and financial relationships with customers. Competitors may also try to compete with us on price both directly, through rebates and promotional programs to high volume injectors and coupons to consumers, and indirectly, through attractive product bundling with complementary products, such as dermal fillers, that offer convenience and an effectively lower price compared to the total price of purchasing each product separately. In addition, as more companies develop new intellectual property in our markets, the possibility of a competitor acquiring patent or other rights that may limit our Products or potential indications for our products increases, which could lead to litigation. Current competitors have asserted and competitors in the future could assert patent infringement claims against us, which could require us to pay damages, halt or delay commercialization, suspend the manufacture of our Products or reengineer or rebrand our Products. See “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.” We expect to compete directly with competitors that sell injectable neuromodulator products or dermal fillers in the markets where we have a labeled indication and/or regulatory clearance. We may also indirectly compete with approved neuromodulators in other markets which are able to offer neuromodulator products and dermal fillers at lower costs.
Injectable Botulinum Toxin Neuromodulators
Our primary competitors for DAXXIFY® globally are companies offering injectable dose forms of neuromodulators. DAXXIFY® is currently competing in the U.S. aesthetics market and has begun to compete in the therapeutics market. Current and potential future competitors include:
•BOTOX® and BOTOX® Cosmetic, which are marketed by AbbVie. BOTOX® and BOTOX® Cosmetic have been approved for multiple indications, including glabellar lines, forehead lines, crow's feet, spasticity, cervical dystonia and chronic migraine in the U.S. and globally.
•Dysport®, which is marketed by Ipsen Ltd. and Galderma. Dysport® has been approved for multiple indications, including glabellar lines, cervical dystonia and upper and lower limb spasticity in the U.S. and certain other countries. Dysport® is also marketed as Azzalure® for glabellar lines in certain European countries.
•Xeomin®, which is marketed by Merz. Xeomin® has been approved for multiple indications, including glabellar lines, cervical dystonia and upper limb spasticity in the U.S. and certain other countries. Xeomin® is also marketed as Bocouture® for glabellar lines in certain European countries.
•Jeuveau®, which is marketed by Evolus, Inc. Jeuveau® has only been approved for the treatment of glabellar lines in the U.S. Jeuveau® is also known as NABOTA® or Nuceiva™ in certain other countries.
•Myobloc® (rimabotulinumtoxinB), which is marketed by US Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Myobloc® has been approved for multiple indications, including the treatment of cervical dystonia in the U.S. and in certain other countries.
In addition, there are other competing neuromodulators currently being developed, going through the regulatory approval process and to be commercialized in the U.S. and other markets, including neuromodulators with extended duration claims. If other neuromodulators are approved, especially with extended duration claims, it would increase competition for DAXXIFY® and potentially limit adoption of DAXXIFY®. In addition, markets outside of the U.S. may or may not require adherence to cGMPs or the regulatory requirements of the EMA or other regulatory agencies in countries that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. While some of these products may not meet U.S. regulatory standards, the companies operating in these markets may be able to produce products at a lower cost than U.S. and European manufacturers.
Dermal Fillers
Our primary competitors for the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers in the U.S. include:
•the Juvéderm® family of fillers, which are marketed by AbbVie. The Juvéderm® family of fillers have been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe loss of jawline definition, augmentation of the chin region, moderate to severe, facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds, lip augmentation and perioral lines.
•the Restylane® family of fillers, which are marketed by Galderma. The Restylane® family of fillers have been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds, age-related midface contour deficiencies, volume loss of the dorsal hand, upper perioral wrinkles, and for cheek and chin augmentation.
•RADIESSE® and RADIESSE® (+), which are marketed by Merz. RADIESSE® and RADIESSE® (+) have been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds, and for volume loss of the hand.
•Sculptra® Aesthetic, which is marketed by Galderma. Sculptra® Aesthetic is approved for the treatment of shallow to deep nasolabial folds and facial fat loss.
•Belotero Balance® and Belotero Balance® (+), which is marketed by Merz. Belotero Balance® and Belotero Balance® (+) are approved for the treatment of moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds.
We are aware of competing dermal fillers currently commercialized or under development in the U.S. and are monitoring the competitive pipeline environment.
Government Regulations
Product Approval Process in the U.S.
In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs and biologic products under the FDCA, its implementing regulations, and other laws, including, in the case of biologics, the Public Health Service Act. Our products and product candidates, including DAXXIFY® and an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, are subject to regulation by the FDA as biologics. Biologics require the submission of a BLA to the FDA and approval of the BLA by the FDA before marketing in the U.S.
The process of obtaining regulatory approvals for commercial sale and distribution and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial civil or criminal sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, license suspension or revocation, withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold on clinical trials, warning or untitled letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, debarment, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties. The process required by the FDA before a biologic may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves the following:
•completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies performed in accordance with the GLPs;
•submission to the FDA of an IND which must become effective before human clinical trials in the U.S. may begin;
•approval by an IRB, at each clinical trial site before each trial may be initiated;
•performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with the GCP regulations to establish the safety and efficacy of the product candidate for its intended use;
•submission to the FDA of a BLA;
•satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection, if the FDA deems it as a requirement, of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the product is produced to assess compliance with cGMP regulations to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, potency, quality and purity, as well as compliance with applicable QSR for devices;
•potential inspections by the FDA of the nonclinical and clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the BLA;
•potential review of the BLA by an external advisory committee to the FDA, whose recommendations are not binding on the FDA; and
•FDA review and approval of the BLA prior to any commercial marketing or sale.
Preclinical Studies
Before testing any compounds with potential therapeutic value in humans, the product candidate enters the preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, stability and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess the potential toxicity and activity of the product candidate. The conduct of the preclinical tests must comply with federal regulations and requirements including GLPs. The sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and a proposed clinical protocol, to the FDA as part of the IND. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA raises concerns or questions about the conduct of the clinical trial, including concerns that human research subjects will be exposed to unreasonable health risks. In such cases, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any
outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. The FDA may also impose clinical holds on a product candidate at any time before or during clinical trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance, or for other reasons.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials involve the administration of the product candidate to human patients under the supervision of qualified investigators, generally physicians not employed by or under the clinical trial sponsor’s control. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria, and the parameters to be used to monitor subject safety and effectiveness. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with GCPs. Further, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an IRB at or servicing each institution at which the clinical trial will be conducted. An IRB is charged with protecting the welfare and rights of clinical trial participants and considers such items as whether the risks to individuals participating in the clinical trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB also approves the form and content of the informed consent that must be signed by each clinical trial subject or his or her legal representative and must monitor the clinical trial until completed. Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:
•Phase 1. The product candidate is initially introduced into a limited population of healthy human subjects and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. In the case of some products for some diseases, or when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients with the disease or condition for which the product candidate is intended to gain an early indication of its effectiveness.
•Phase 2. The product candidate is evaluated in a limited patient population, but larger than in Phase 1, to identify possible adverse events and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted indications and to assess dosage tolerance, optimal dosage and dosing schedule.
•Phase 3. Clinical trials are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, and provide substantial evidence of clinical efficacy and safety in an expanded patient population, such as several hundred to several thousand, at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. Phase 3 clinical trials are typically conducted when Phase 2 clinical trials demonstrate that a dose range of the product candidate is effective and has an acceptable safety profile. These trials typically have at least 2 groups of patients who, in a blinded fashion, receive either the product or a placebo. Phase 3 clinical trials are intended to establish the overall risk/benefit ratio of the product and provide an adequate basis for product labeling. Generally, two adequate and well-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials are required by the FDA for approval of a BLA.
Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication to further assess the biologic’s safety and effectiveness after BLA approval. Phase 4 trials can be initiated by the drug sponsor or as a condition of BLA approval by the FDA.
Annual progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted to the FDA and written IND safety reports must be promptly submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events or any finding from tests in laboratory animals that suggests a significant risk for human subjects.
Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the biologic and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final biologic product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
U.S. Review and Approval Processes
The results of product development, preclinical studies and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests, proposed labeling and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA in the form of a BLA requesting approval to market the product for one or more specified indications. The submission of a BLA is subject to the payment of substantial user fees.
Once the FDA receives a BLA, it has 60 days to review the BLA to determine if it is substantially complete and the data are readable, before it accepts the BLA for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the BLA. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under the PDUFA, the FDA has twelve months from submission in which to complete its initial review of a standard BLA and make a decision on the application, and eight months from submission for a priority BLA, and such deadline is referred to as the PDUFA date. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA dates for either standard or priority BLAs. The review process and the PDUFA date may be extended by three months if the FDA requests or the BLA sponsor otherwise provides major additional information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission at any time before the PDUFA date.
After the BLA submission is accepted for filing, the FDA reviews the BLA to determine, among other things, whether the proposed product is safe and effective for its intended use, and whether the product is being manufactured in accordance with cGMP to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, potency, quality and purity. The FDA may refer applications for novel drug or biological products or drug or biological products which present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions. During the approval process, the FDA also will determine whether a REMS is necessary to assure the safe use of the product. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor of the BLA must submit a proposed REMS; in such cases, the FDA will not approve the BLA without an approved REMS. A REMS can substantially increase the costs of obtaining approval and limit commercial opportunity.
Before approving a BLA, the FDA can inspect the facilities at which the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve the BLA unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving a BLA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure that the clinical trials were conducted in compliance with GCP requirements. If the FDA determines that the application, manufacturing process or manufacturing facilities are not acceptable, it will outline the deficiencies in the submission and often will request additional clinical testing or information before a BLA can be approved.
The FDA will issue a complete response letter if the agency decides not to approve the BLA. The complete response letter describes all of the specific deficiencies in the BLA identified by the FDA during review. The deficiencies identified may be minor, for example, requiring labeling changes, or major, for example, requiring additional clinical trials. Additionally, the complete response letter may include recommended actions that the applicant might take to place the application in a condition for approval. If a complete response letter is issued, the applicant may either resubmit the BLA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter, or withdraw the application.
If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may require post marketing studies, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 testing, which involves clinical trials designed to further assess drug safety and effectiveness and may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized. After approval, certain changes to the approved biologic, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes or additional labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval. Depending on the nature of the change proposed, a BLA supplement must be submitted and approved before the change may be implemented and may require the development of additional data, including preclinical studies, clinical trials or other studies. For certain proposed post-approval changes to a BLA, the FDA has up to 10 months to review the supplement. As with new BLAs, the review process is often significantly extended by the FDA requests for additional information or clarification.
Post-Approval Requirements
Any biologic products for which we receive FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information, product sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements, which include, among others, restrictions on direct-to-consumer advertising, promoting biologics for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the product’s approved labeling, known as “off-label use,” industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, and promotional activities involving the internet. The FDA and other agencies closely regulate the post-approval marketing and promotion of biologics, and although physicians may prescribe legally available drugs for off-label uses, manufacturers may not market or promote such off-label uses. The FDA does not regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments but the FDA does restrict manufacturers' communications on the subject of off-label use of their products. Failure to comply with these or other FDA requirements can subject a manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, such as warning letters, suspension of manufacturing, seizure of product, injunctive action, mandated corrective advertising or communications with healthcare professionals, possible civil or criminal penalties or other negative consequences, including adverse publicity.
We currently manufacture drug supplies using a combination of third-party manufacturers and our own manufacturing facility. Our future collaborators may also utilize third parties for some or all of a product we are developing with such collaborator. We and our third-party manufacturers are required to comply with applicable FDA manufacturing requirements contained in the cGMP regulations. cGMP regulations require among other things, quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation. Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved biologics are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
U.S. Patent Term Restoration and Marketing Exclusivity
Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of the FDA approval of our biologic product candidate, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible to be the basis for an application for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. Such Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process, which coincides with the period of product development and regulatory review. However, patent term restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term restoration period is generally one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of a BLA plus the time between the submission date of a BLA and the approval of that application. Each phase of the patent term restoration period is reduced by any time that the applicant did not act with due diligence during that phase. Only one patent applicable to an approved product may be extended, and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent and within 60 days after drug approval. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension. We have applied for extension of patent term for three of our currently owned or licensed patents to add patent term beyond the current expiration date of one of the patents.
Market exclusivity provisions under the FDCA can also delay the submission or the approval of certain applications of other companies seeking to reference another company’s BLA. Specifically, the BPCIA established an abbreviated pathway for the approval of biosimilar and interchangeable biological products. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product cannot be approved by the FDA until twelve years after the original branded product was approved under a BLA. However, an application may be submitted after four years, which initiates a process in which the innovator BLA holder and the biosimilar applicant identify patents that could be litigated and resolve patent disputes.
Product Approval Process Outside the U.S.
In addition to regulations in the U.S., we will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing manufacturing, clinical trials, commercial sales and distribution of our future products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product
candidate, we must obtain approval of the product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before commencing clinical trials or marketing in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from country to country.
Federal and State Fraud and Abuse and Data Privacy and Security Laws and Regulations
There are also healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations that extensively govern how pharmaceutical companies, like Revance, operate. Applicable federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws include:
•The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid;
•The federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the civil False Claims Act, and civil monetary penalties laws, which prohibit individuals or entities from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;
•The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the ACA), commonly known as the Sunshine Act or Open Payments, requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies to disclose certain payments and financial relationships with healthcare providers directly to CMS. Failure to comply with these laws can result in significant civil monetary penalties;
•HIPAA mandates, among other things, the adoption of uniform standards for the electronic exchange of information in common health care transactions as well as standards relating to the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information. These standards require the adoption of administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect such information. In addition, many states have enacted comparable laws addressing the privacy and security of health information, some of which are more stringent than HIPAA. Failure to comply with these laws can result in the imposition of significant civil and criminal penalties;
•Other analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, may apply to healthcare related items or services that are reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers.
In General
The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of available statutory and regulatory exemptions, it is possible that some of our business activities now and in the future could be subject to challenge under one or more of these laws. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the federal and state laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to legal or administrative actions, which may include orders to cease any con-compliant activities, warning letters, investigations, product recalls or seizures, delays in product approvals and significant penalties, including criminal and civil monetary penalties, damages, charges, fines, imprisonment, exclusion of products from reimbursement under government healthcare programs, integrity oversight, limitations on conducting business in applicable jurisdictions and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. To the extent that any of our products are sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws and regulations, which may include, for instance, applicable post-marketing requirements, including safety surveillance, anti-fraud and abuse laws and implementation of corporate compliance programs and reporting of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.
U.S. and Foreign Privacy and Security Laws and Regulations
In the ordinary course of our business, we may process personal data. Accordingly, we are, or may become, subject to numerous data privacy and security obligations, including federal, state and local laws, regulations, guidance, and industry standards related to data privacy, security, and protection.
HIPAA Privacy and Security Requirements
HIPAA imposes strict privacy, security, and breach notification obligations and standards on “covered entities” related to their use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information, defined by HIPAA as PHI. Covered entities are defined under HIPAA to include healthcare providers that undertake certain electronic transmissions of PHI, such as submitting electronic claims for reimbursement for the treatment of patients. Many of our healthcare provider customers are considered to be covered entities. HIPAA also applies to Business Associates, which are entities that perform certain functions or activities that involve the use or disclosure of PHI on behalf of a covered entity or entities that provide services to a covered entity. Even though we are generally not a covered entity or a Business Associate in our product-related activities, HIPAA limits the amount of data including PHI that can be shared between our business and our healthcare provider customers. In certain of our activities, including our Services-related activities, which we are in the final stages of winding down, Revance or OPUL® may be considered a Business Associate of OPUL®'s aesthetic practice customers and directly subject to HIPAA. For instance we have entered into Business Associate agreements with covered entities related to OPUL®, as discussed more below. We also may be subject to certain of HIPAA’s provisions as a covered entity related to our Company health plan. HIPAA is generally enforced by the OCR, which can bring enforcement actions against companies that violate HIPAA’s privacy, security or breach notification rules and levy significant civil fines and/or require changes to the manner in which PHI is used and disclosed. The U.S. Department of Justice has authority under HIPAA to bring criminal enforcement actions against covered entities, Business Associates and other entities for certain misuses of PHI and other criminal acts. Further, HIPAA authorizes state attorneys general to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. If we are in possession of PHI as a Business Associate or in connection with our employee health plan covered entity and we have an unauthorized use or disclosure of the PHI, we may be required pursuant to the HIPAA breach notification rule, to notify our covered entity customer(s), impacted individuals, and/or OCR.
Our aesthetic practice customers have used OPUL® to process personal data and PHI. Where we are determined to be a Business Associate of our aesthetic practice customers who are covered entities pursuant to HIPAA, the HIPAA Security and Breach Notification Rules may apply directly to our Business Associate activities. Further, the terms of the Business Associate agreements we entered into with covered entities also generally obligate Revance to comply with the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Other Privacy and Security Requirements
In addition to HIPAA, we may be subject to other federal and state laws that govern the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data.
Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices directed toward consumers. The FTC has brought aggressive enforcement actions against companies they believe have made material misrepresentations on their website or mobile app privacy statements with respect to their processing of personal data of consumers. In addition, state privacy laws include consumer protection laws that are very similar to the FTC Act and that are enforced by state attorneys general.
Additionally, the TCPA governs the manner in which we send mobile phone marketing and commercial messages to consumers. The U.S. Federal Communication Commission enforces the TCPA, however, the TCPA includes a private right of action with statutory damages and there have been lawsuits brought by private plaintiffs against biopharmaceutical and medical device companies. While a 2021 Supreme Court decision narrowed the applicability of the TCPA’s restrictions, plaintiffs continue to test the boundaries of the decision, and a few states, including Florida and Oklahoma, have adopted TCPA-like laws that similarly provide for statutory damages and a private right of action. Additional states may follow suit.
Several states, including, but not limited to, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah and Virginia, have adopted generally applicable and comprehensive privacy laws, although most have an exception for information regulated by HIPAA. These new and developing state laws provide a number of new privacy rights for residents of these states and impose
corresponding obligations on organizations doing business in these states. For example, the CCPA imposes obligations on covered businesses to provide specific disclosures related to a business’s collection, use, sale, and disclosure of personal data and to respond to certain requests from California residents related to their personal data (for example, requests to know of the business’s personal data processing activities, to delete the individual’s personal data, and to opt out of certain personal data disclosures). The CCPA provides for civil penalties and a private right of action for data breaches which may include an award of statutory damages. In addition, the CPRA, which took effect January 1, 2023, expanded the CCPA, giving California residents the ability to limit use of certain sensitive personal data, established restrictions on personal data retention, expanded the types of data breaches that are subject to the CCPA’s private right of action, and established a new California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the CCPA, among other things. Revance may be required to comply with other states’ privacy and data protection laws as they come into effect during 2024.
Our operations abroad may also be subject to increased scrutiny or attention from data protection authorities. Many countries in the regions where we operate have established or are in the process of establishing privacy laws with which we, our customers, and our vendors must comply. For example, while not currently applicable to Revance, European data privacy and security laws (including the EU GDPR and the UK GDPR) impose significant and complex compliance obligations on entities that are subject to those laws. For example, the EU GDPR applies to any company established in the EEA and to companies established outside the EEA that process personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to data subjects in the EEA or the monitoring of the behavior of data subjects in the EEA. These obligations may include limiting personal data processing to only what is necessary for specified, explicit, and legitimate purposes; requiring a legal basis for personal data processing; requiring the appointment of a data protection officer in certain circumstances; increasing transparency obligations to data subjects; requiring data protection impact assessments in certain circumstances; limiting the collection and retention of personal data; increasing rights for data subjects; formalizing a heightened and codified standard of data subject consents; requiring the implementation and maintenance of technical and organizational safeguards for personal data; mandating notice of certain personal data breaches to the relevant supervisory authority(ies) and affected individuals; and mandating the appointment of representatives in the United Kingdom and/or the European Union in certain circumstances. The processing of ‘special categories of personal data’ (such as data concerning health, biometric data used for unique identification purposes and genetic information) imposes further heightened compliance burdens under the UK GDPR and EU GDPR and is a topic of active interest among foreign regulators.
Compliance with HIPAA, federal and state privacy laws and breach notification laws, the GDPR and other foreign privacy laws, and other non-harmonized laws can be costly and time consuming and failure to comply may result in significant fines, penalties, or other liabilities. Moreover, if our employees fail to adhere to the Company’s processes and practices for the protection and/or appropriate use of personal data or PHI, or in other ways violate privacy laws or breach notification laws, it may damage our reputation and brand. Finally, any failure by our vendors to comply with the terms of our contractual provisions or the applicable privacy laws or breach notification laws, could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others.
As our business continues to expand in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, and as laws and regulations continue to be passed and their interpretations continue to evolve in numerous jurisdictions, additional laws and regulations may become relevant to us. See the section titled “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Government and Industry Regulation” for additional information about the laws and regulations to which we are or may become subject and about the risks to our business associated with such laws and regulations. Security Failures and Breach Notification Laws
Our information technology systems, cloud-based computing services and those of our current and any future vendors, collaborators, contractors, or consultants may be subject to interruption and compromise. We and the third parties upon which we rely may be subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, and other similar threats.
We are required to comply with laws, rules and regulations that require us to maintain the security of personal data. In the event of a security incident, we may have contractual and other legal obligations to notify relevant stakeholders. In
addition to the breach notification obligations under HIPAA, every state in the U.S. now has similar breach notification laws. Breach notification laws vary from state to state but upon an unauthorized access or disclosure of certain sensitive personal data, generally require notification to data subjects as well as notification in some circumstances to state agencies, such as the state attorneys general or the consumer protection bureau, and in some circumstances, notification to media.
See the section titled “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Business and Strategy” for additional information about our use of information technology systems and about the risks to our business associated with such information technology systems.
Medical Device Distribution
As the distributor of Teoxane’s RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, we are required to maintain certain licenses, registrations, permits, authorizations, approvals or other types of state and local permissions in order to comply with various regulations regarding the distribution of medical devices, and we are contractually obligated to cooperate with Teoxane in the event of any medical device reports (adverse events) or product recalls. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements may take many months, and may require the expenditure of substantial resources. Failure to comply with such regulatory requirements can result in enforcement actions, including the revocation or suspension of licenses, registrations or accreditations, and can also subject us to plans of correction, monitoring, civil monetary penalties, civil injunctive relief and/or criminal penalties. Failure to obtain state regulatory approval will also prevent distribution of products where such approval is necessary and will limit our ability to generate revenue. Maintaining the necessary compliance infrastructure to support these activities will result in increased expense.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Patients in the United States and elsewhere generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse part or all of the costs associated with their prescription drugs. Accordingly, our ability to commercialize DAXXIFY® or any future product candidates for therapeutic indications such as cervical dystonia and adult upper limb spasticity will depend in part on the coverage and reimbursement levels set by governmental authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors. As a threshold for coverage and reimbursement, third-party payors generally require that drug products have been approved for marketing by the FDA. Third-party payors also are increasingly challenging the effectiveness of and prices charged for medical products and services. We may not obtain adequate third-party coverage or reimbursement for DAXXIFY® or any future product candidates for therapeutic indications, or we may be required to sell them at a discount.
We expect that third-party payors will consider the efficacy, cost effectiveness and safety of DAXXIFY® in determining whether to approve reimbursement for DAXXIFY® for therapeutic indications and at what level. Our business would be materially adversely affected if we do not receive coverage and adequate reimbursement of DAXXIFY® for therapeutic indications from private insurers on a timely or satisfactory basis. No uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors in the U.S.; therefore, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. Further, coverage under certain government programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, may not be available for certain of our product candidates. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new product will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare, and private third-party payors often follow CMS’s decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement to a substantial degree. However, one third-party payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product candidate does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product candidate. As a result, the coverage determination process will likely be a time-consuming and costly process, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. Further, coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which the Company receives regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
In some foreign countries, particularly Canada and European countries, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to strict governmental control. In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some countries provide that products may be marketed only after a reimbursement price has been agreed. Some countries may require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies, and so we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our products, including DAXXIFY®, to other available therapies. European Union member states may
approve a specific price for a product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the Company placing the product on the market. Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for products, but monitor and control Company profits.
U.S. Healthcare Reform
The ACA was passed in March 2010, and substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers and continues to significantly impact the U.S. biotechnology industry. There have been challenges by the executive, judicial and legislative branches of government to certain aspects of the ACA. The U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would repeal or repeal and replace all or part of the ACA. While the U.S. Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, it has enacted laws that modify certain provisions of the ACA such as removing penalties, which began January 1, 2019, for not complying with the ACA’s individual mandate to carry health insurance. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by the U.S. Congress. Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, the current administration issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. In addition, on August 16, 2022, the IRA was signed into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost through a newly established manufacturer discount program. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how such challenges and the healthcare reform measures of the current administration will impact the ACA and our business.
In addition, there have been several recent U.S. congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted state and federal legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, reduce the costs of drugs under Medicare and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. In July 2021, the current administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to the executive order, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that the U.S. Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA, among other things, (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although they may be subject to legal challenges. Further, the current administration released an additional executive order on October 14, 2022, directing HHS to submit a report within ninety (90) days on how the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation can be further leveraged to test new models for lowering drug costs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. As of August 29, 2023, CMS announced its selection of the first 10 drugs covered under Medicare Part D set for negotiation. CMS will publish any agreed-upon negotiated prices for the selected drugs by September 1, 2024; those prices will come into effect starting January 1, 2026. In future years, CMS will select for negotiation up to 15 more drugs covered under Part D for 2027, up to 15 more drugs for 2028 (including drugs covered under Part B and Part D), and up to 20 more drugs for each year after that, as outlined in the IRA.
At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
Environment, Health and Safety
We are also subject to other federal, state and local regulations regarding workplace safety and protection of the environment. We use hazardous materials, chemicals, and various compounds in our research and development activities and cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. Certain misuse or accidents involving these materials could lead to significant litigation, fines and penalties. We have implemented proactive programs to reduce and minimize the risk of hazardous materials incidents.
Human Capital Management
As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 597 employees, all of which are located in the U.S. Our employee base grew from 534 as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2023, there were no unions represented within our employee base. We may need to expand our workforce as our company grows.
We believe that empowered employees make a difference in our ability to execute our strategy. As such, we strive to provide an inclusive, rewarding and engaging environment for employees to develop professionally and contribute to our success.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
We believe in equal opportunity employment and do not tolerate discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin/ancestry, age, disability, marital or veteran status. In addition, because we believe that a diverse workforce is critical to our success, in mid-2020, we formed a Diversity and Inclusion Committee, comprised of employees and led by our Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary. This committee had a mission to foster inclusivity, diversity and equity by actively educating and empowering employees to help dismantle systems of oppression, which include racism and other explicit or implicit bias at the Company and within our communities. As a reflection of this commitment, for the past three years we established Company performance goals, which are also included as performance measures in the 2023 bonus program for our executive officers, tied to the achievement of specified diversity and inclusion initiatives. In 2023, we formed the Revance Inclusion, Support and Empowerment (RISE) team, comprised of various employee resource groups and led by our Chief People Officer, which replaced the Diversity and Inclusion Committee, in order to enhance the Company's diversity, equity and inclusion programming.
As of December 31, 2023, women represented 58% of our workforce and 46% of our leadership team (defined as our management team and executive employees), and ethnic minorities represented 41% of our workforce and 43% of our leadership team.
Training and Talent Development
We believe that our employees are the key to our success, and we believe their development is what supports our growth and prosperity as a company. To support employee development and growth, we offer development training and workshops to all full-time employees. In addition, personal development plans for full-time employees are discussed and reviewed each year with their supervisor. We also offer an education tuition reimbursement program.
Upon joining the Company, all new employees are required to become familiar with our policies and complete compliance training, and existing employees are required to acknowledge certain policies annually.
Compensation and Benefits
Our objective is to provide our employees with a choice in quality benefits that are competitive and cost-efficient with the flexibility to meet employees’ life needs. Our compensation package includes market-competitive pay, an annual bonus program, an employee stock purchase plan, long-term incentive awards, rewards and recognition opportunities, an education assistance program, health care and retirement benefits, paid time off and family leave, among others. We grant equity as part of our new hire and annual compensation programs. We are committed to fair wages and benefits for employees at all locations and use appropriate national and local external surveys to provide highly competitive wages and benefits to attract high quality talent.
Health and Safety
We are committed to the safety of our employees and communities. We provide regular health and safety training programs for employees, which includes, upon on-boarding, an overview during new hire orientation, personal protective equipment training, ergonomics evaluation procedures and first aid training. All employees are trained on workplace safety, including security and inspection, work related injuries and emergency protocols. We also conduct special additional training for laboratory staff.
ESG
As our business continues to grow and develop, we are focused on building a sustainable enterprise for all of our stakeholders while driving a positive impact on the communities in which we serve. In 2020, we made a formal commitment to ESG and published our inaugural ESG report in January 2021, which was guided by the SASB framework for our sector. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees Revance’s ESG strategy and initiatives. In addition, the Company’s ESG Steering Committee, which is comprised of leadership across key business units including investor relations, communications, legal, finance and accounting, manufacturing and supply chain, human resources, enterprise risk management and compliance, leads the planning and execution of the company’s ESG program.
Building on our long-term commitment to ESG, we have continued to advance our program and further refined our ESG framework to better align with our corporate strategy and values. Our ESG strategy is centered on three pillars, which we believe are essential to creating long-term value for all our stakeholders:
•Innovation and Access: We are committed to setting new standards for patient care and physician experience, while simultaneously helping optimize the overall healthcare system. The cornerstone of this effort is delivering innovation to address unmet consumer, patient, injector and HCP needs through our portfolio of Products.
•Strong Workplace Culture: We aspire to attract and retain a diverse and highly skilled workforce to foster a culture of innovation. Through efforts to ensure diversity, equality and inclusivity, we hope to unlock the tremendous potential of our team and its impact on the communities in which we serve.
•Responsible Business: We seek to build trust with our stakeholders and identify and mitigate risks to the Company by implementing strong corporate governance practices and utilizing clear and actionable policies to support product quality and safety and minimize our environmental footprint where possible.
Our 2022 ESG report, published in March 2023, reflects our focus on these pillars. It also detailed the results of our first materiality assessment and progress across the environmental, social, and governance issues it identified. The materiality assessment was developed in response to stockholder feedback, and was led by our ESG Steering Committee, with oversight from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the ESG Steering Committee. The assessment enabled us to understand the importance level of various ESG matters to Revance and our stakeholders.
Our ESG initiatives going forward will continue to be guided by our three pillars of innovation, in addition to our materiality assessment. For additional information, please refer to our 2022 ESG Report, which is found on the Corporate Governance page of our company website at www.revance.com.
Corporate Information
We were incorporated in Delaware in August 1999, under the name Essentia Biosystems, Inc. We commenced operations in June 2002 and, in April 2005, changed our name to Revance Therapeutics, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 1222 Demonbreun Street, Suite 2000, Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, and our telephone number is (615) 724-7755.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge through our website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and any amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to
Sections 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC at www.sec.gov. Our website address is www.revance.com. Information contained on or accessible through these websites is not incorporated by reference nor otherwise included in this Report, and any references to these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as all other information included in this Report, including our consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before you decide to purchase shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be materially harmed. As a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations and stock price.
Risks Related to Our Business and Strategy
We are substantially dependent on the clinical and commercial success of our Products.
Our near-term prospects and our future growth, including our ability to finance our business and generate revenue, is substantially dependent on the clinical and commercial success of DAXXIFY® and our ability to continue to generate revenue from the sales of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers.
In September 2022, we announced the DAXXIFY® GL Approval. In addition, in September 2023, we introduced new pricing for DAXXIFY®, which priced the product more competitively with BOTOX®. As of December 31, 2023, we have generated $95.0 million in revenue from the commercial sale of DAXXIFY® since the DAXXIFY® GL Approval in September 2022. If our aesthetics strategy, including the new pricing for DAXXIFY®, does not lead to additional product adoption as expected or we are unable to continue or increase the commercial success of DAXXIFY® as expected, our revenues may not be sufficient to support our existing operating plan, which may require us to refinance our debt, conduct additional financings, restructure operations, sell assets or reduce our operating expenses. In August 2023, we announced the approval of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia, which is our first therapeutics indication. We have limited experience in commercializing products in the therapeutics space and have not yet demonstrated that DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia will be commercially successful. In addition we have not received regulatory approval for or completed the clinical development process for DAXXIFY® for indications other than glabellar lines and cervical dystonia. Although the commercialization of our Products has generated significant revenue to date, we cannot predict the extent to which they will continue to generate revenue.
The success of our Products will depend on a number of factors, including the risks identified in this “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” These factors include, among other things:
•the rate and degree of commercial acceptance, potential market size, opportunity and growth potential of our Products;
•our ability to effectively and reliably manufacture or obtain adequate and timely supplies of DAXXIFY® and obtain adequate and timely supply of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers to meet commercial demand;
•the timing, success, and cost of commercialization activities and other activities needed to operate our business;
•our ability to demonstrate in the medical community the safety, efficacy and duration of our Products and their potential advantages over and side effects compared to competing Products;
•our ability to establish and maintain relationships with injectors and HCPs who will be treating the consumers and patients who may receive our products;
•our ability to obtain adequate pricing and reimbursement for DAXXIFY® in therapeutics;
•our ability to continue to expand our own sales, marketing and other capabilities and infrastructure, or seek collaborative partners, to commercialize our Products as needed, including with respect to therapeutics;
•reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving our Products and the impact of any such reports on their commercialization;
•enforcing our intellectual property rights in and to our Products;
•avoiding third-party patent interference or intellectual property infringement claims;
•our ability to comply with the terms of the Teoxane Agreement, including our obligations with respect to purchase quantities and marketing efforts, which noncompliance could result in termination of the Teoxane Agreement;
•our ability to collaborate with Teoxane to research, develop and obtain necessary approvals from the FDA and similar regulatory authorities for the RHA® Pipeline Products;
•our ability to comply with the legal and regulatory requirements for our Products, including regarding the sales, marketing, manufacturing, price reporting, registration and permitting of our Products, as applicable;
•our ability to adapt to any changes to the labels for our Products that could place restrictions on how we market and sell the Products; and
•maintaining or establishing arrangements with third party logistics providers to distribute our Products to customers.
One or more of these factors, or other factors identified in this “Item 1A. Risk Factors”, many of which are beyond our control, could impact the commercialization of and our ability to generate revenue from the sales of our Products, and any future products we may develop or acquire, which would materially impact the success of our business.
We have incurred significant losses since our inception and we anticipate that we will continue to incur GAAP operating losses for the foreseeable future and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.
We are not profitable and have incurred losses each year since we commenced operations in 2002. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to increase our revenue to offset our operating expenses. Our revenue may not increase or could decline for a number of other reasons, including reduced demand for our Products, increased competition, a decrease in the growth or reduction in size of the overall market for our Products, or if we cannot maintain our strategic partnerships, including with Teoxane, ABPS, PCI, Viatris and Fosun. In addition, we may not receive or generate anticipated revenue on the timeframe expected. If we cannot generate sufficient revenue from the sale of our Products to fulfill our existing operating plan, we may be required to refinance our debt, conduct additional financings, restructure operations, sell assets or reduce our operating expenses.
In addition, our operating expenses may increase in the future as we optimize and grow our business, including as a result of our commercialization efforts across aesthetics and therapeutics and continuing to invest in research, development, regulatory approvals and the manufacturing and supply of DAXXIFY® for commercialization. Further, our estimates regarding the amounts necessary to accomplish our business objectives may be inaccurate; other unanticipated costs may arise; and, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional capital sooner than planned, through public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, such as strategic collaborations. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans.
Additional capital may not be available when needed, on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, or at all, we may be required to take capital preservation measures, including to reduce operating expense and delay, reduce the scope of, discontinue or alter our research and development activities; our sales and marketing capabilities or other activities that may be necessary to continue to commercialize our Products and other aspects of our business plan. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue to fulfill our operating plan or we are unable to secure additional capital when needed or sufficiently reduce our operating expenses, we may be unable to comply with the Minimum Cash Covenant, which would raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our inability to secure additional financing or sufficiently reduce our operating expenses may otherwise limit our ability to capitalize on business opportunities or compete effectively, and our business may be harmed.
If we raise additional capital through marketing and distribution arrangements, royalty financings or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may need to relinquish certain valuable rights to our product candidates, technologies, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings, the ownership interest of our existing stockholders will be diluted and the terms of any new equity securities may have a preference over our common stock. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to specified financial covenants or covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or pursuing certain transactions, any of which could restrict our ability to commercialize our product candidates or operate as a business; and our assets may be subject to liens. In addition, our ability to raise capital may be limited by restrictions under the Note Purchase Agreement, including our ability to sell or license intellectual property, and other reasons like the global economy, inflation or other macroeconomic factors.
Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Our prior losses, combined with expected future losses, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations.
If we fail to maintain FDA approval to market and sell DAXXIFY® or if we or Teoxane fail to maintain the approval of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, we would be unable to continue to commercially distribute and market such Product. Further, our ability to market our Products are limited to approved indications, which may restrict how we market our Products.
Our Products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA. While we received DAXXIFY® GL and DAXXIFY® CD Approval and Teoxane has received approval of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers for certain indications, there can be no assurance that such approvals will be maintained. For example:
•we or Teoxane may not be able to maintain to the FDA’s satisfaction that the applicable Product is safe and effective for its intended use;
•we or Teoxane may fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations to maintain approval; and
•the manufacturing processes and facilities we and our vendors use may not meet applicable requirements to maintain approval.
Failing to maintain FDA approval could result in unexpected and significant costs for us and consume management’s time and other resources. The FDA could ask us to improve or augment manufacturing processes, collect and provide data on the quality or safety of a Product or issue us warning letters relating to matters that may result in removal of a Product from the market.
Further, we have received approval for DAXXIFY® solely for the glabellar line and cervical dystonia indications. Many of our competitors have received approval of multiple aesthetic and therapeutic indications for their neuromodulator products and are able to market such products for use in a way that we cannot. The restrictions on how we can market DAXXIFY® in comparison to competitors could limit injector, HCP and consumer adoption.
We may use third-party collaborators to help us develop, validate and commercialize our Products and product candidates, and our ability to commercialize such Products and product candidates could be impaired or delayed if these collaborations are unsuccessful.
We may continue to license or selectively pursue strategic collaborations for the development, validation and commercialization of DAXXIFY®, an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, hyaluronic acid filler products, and any future product candidates. Examples of such strategic collaborations include the ABPS Services Agreement, PCI Supply Agreement, Viatris Agreement, Fosun License Agreement and Teoxane Agreement. In any third-party collaboration, we are dependent upon the success of the collaborators to perform their responsibilities with continued cooperation. Our collaborators may not cooperate with us or perform their obligations under our agreements with them. We cannot control the amount and timing of our collaborators’ resources that will be devoted to performing their responsibilities under our agreements with them. Our collaborators may choose to pursue alternative technologies in preference to those being developed in collaboration with us. The development, validation and commercialization of our product candidates will be delayed if collaborators fail to conduct
their responsibilities in a timely manner or in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements or if they breach, terminate or choose not to renew their collaboration agreements with us. The breach, termination or non-renewal of any of our collaboration agreements could materially and adversely impact our financial and operating results. Disputes with our collaborators could also impair our reputation or result in development delays, decreased revenues and litigation expenses.
The Teoxane Agreement requires us to make specified annual minimum purchases of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers and to meet specified expenditure levels in connection with our marketing of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers in furtherance of the commercialization of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, regardless of whether our commercialization efforts are successful. Such expenditure requirements may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business and our prospects for future growth, or may result in the termination of the Teoxane Agreement.
If we fail to meet the annual minimum purchase amount or the annual minimum marketing spending requirements specified in the Teoxane Agreement, Teoxane has the right to terminate the Teoxane Agreement. Termination of the Teoxane Agreement could materially impact our financial and operating results.
If our commercialization efforts of our Products are unsuccessful, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient cash flow to comply with such minimum purchase and expenditure requirements. Our obligation to Teoxane to meet such requirements could:
•make it more difficult for us to satisfy obligations with respect to our indebtedness, including the 2027 Notes and the Notes Payable, and any failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt instruments, including financial and other restrictive covenants, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing such indebtedness;
•require us to dedicate a substantial portion of available cash flow to meet the minimum expenditure requirements, which will reduce the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
•limit flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;
•limit our ability to engage in strategic transactions or implement our business strategies;
•limit our ability to borrow additional funds; and
•place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors.
Any of the factors listed above could materially and adversely affect our business and our results of operations.
Worldwide economic and market conditions, an unstable economy, a decline in consumer-spending levels and other adverse developments, including inflation, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and liquidity, and stock price.
As widely reported, in recent years, global credit and financial markets have experienced volatility and disruptions, including declines in consumer confidence, concerns about declines in economic growth and unemployment, increases in the rate of inflation, increases in borrowing rates and changes in liquidity and credit availability, and uncertainty about geopolitical events and other challenges affecting the global economy, including most recently in connection with actions undertaken by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board to address inflation, the Ukraine-Russia and Israel-Hamas conflicts, the continuing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain disruptions. These factors could lead to further disruption, instability, and volatility in global markets, continue to increase inflation, disrupt supply chains, adversely affect consumer confidence and disposable income levels and have other impacts on our business. For example, inflation has impacted the cost of supplies to manufacture DAXXIFY® and other aspects of our business. In addition, if the current equity and credit markets deteriorate, or do not improve, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive. Furthermore, our stock price may decline due in part to the volatility of the stock market and the general economic downturn.
The discretionary nature of aesthetic medical procedures may be vulnerable to unfavorable economic conditions. Due to the cash pay market for aesthetic procedures, demand for our aesthetic Products is tied to discretionary spending levels of our target consumers. Although the facial injectable market has been generally resilient and recovered relatively quickly during past economically challenging times, a severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including a decline in the discretionary spending of our target consumers and financial hardships for injectors which may reduce demand for our aesthetic Products and adversely affect distribution channels for our aesthetic Products. Our business strategy relies on projections related to demand, which projections are inherently uncertain and could be more significantly impacted by an economic downturn.
Changes in U.S. and foreign trade policies or border closures, including as a result of geopolitical crises or the COVID-19 pandemic, could delay or prevent the export of Products internationally or trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries, resulting in “trade wars”, which may reduce consumer demand for goods exported out of the U.S. if the parties having to pay those retaliatory tariffs increase their prices, or if trading partners limit their trade with the U.S. If these consequences are realized, the price to the consumer of aesthetic or therapeutic medical procedures from products exported out of the U.S. may increase, resulting in a material reduction in the demand for those products. In particular, under our Fosun License Agreement, we are responsible for manufacturing DAXXIFY® and supplying it to Fosun, which would then develop, commercialize, market and sell it in the Fosun Territory. If this arrangement is restricted in any way due to the U.S.–China trade relationship or border closures, the contingent payments we are entitled to receive under the agreement, which are based on product sales, among other things, may be adversely affected.
More recently, the closure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and other financial institutions and their placement into receivership with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) created bank-specific and broader financial institution liquidity risk and concerns. Although the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC jointly released a statement that depositors at SVB would have access to their funds, even those in excess of the standard FDIC insurance limits, under a systemic risk exception, future adverse developments with respect to specific financial institutions or the broader financial services industry may lead to market-wide liquidity shortages, impair the ability of companies to access near-term working capital needs, and create additional market and economic uncertainty. Promptly following the collapse of SVB, we consolidated substantially all of our operating cash activities to our existing Bank of America (BofA) accounts and with the exception of the cash collateral associated with our existing letters of credit, we have transferred substantially all of our cash held at SVB to BofA without any loss. We also transferred our short-term investments managed by SVB to J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM), which was completed without any loss. While we did not hold a material amount of cash at SVB and, as a result, the closure of SVB did not have a material direct impact on our business, continued instability in the global banking system may result in additional bank failures, as well as volatility of global financial markets, either of which may adversely impact our business and financial condition.
These factors could have a negative impact on our potential sales and operating results.
The COVID-19 pandemic has and may continue to, and other actual or threatened epidemics, pandemics, outbreaks, or public health crises may, adversely affect our financial condition and our business.
Our business has been and could in the future be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to an epidemic, pandemic, outbreak, or other public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will further directly or indirectly impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and global economic activity and consumer behavior will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain, including variant strains of the virus and the degree of their vaccine resistance, a rise in infection rates and as a result of new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19, the actions taken to contain or treat it, and the duration and intensity of the related effects.
An epidemic, pandemic, outbreak or other public health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, or the public perception of such a risk, could:
•cause delays in the regulatory approval process or interfere with enrollment and our ability to complete ongoing clinical trials on schedule or at all;
•cause consumers to cancel or defer aesthetic and elective procedures, and cause consumers and patients to avoid public places, including hospitals and injector and HCP offices;
•cause temporary or long-term disruptions in our supply chain, manufacturing and/or delays in the delivery of our inventory; and
•cause a complete or partial closure of one or more of our facilities and offices, or cause employees to avoid our properties, which could adversely affect our ability to adequately staff and manage our businesses.
Risks related to an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could also negatively impact the business or operations of our sourcing or manufacturing partners, CROs, customers or other third parties with whom we conduct business. These and other potential impacts of an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, has and could in the future materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving our Products could result in a loss of regulatory approval for such Products and delay or prevent us or Teoxane from obtaining additional regulatory approvals.
Reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving our Products could result in the FDA or other regulatory authorities withdrawing approval of those Products for any or all indications that have approval, and delay or prevent us or Teoxane from obtaining additional regulatory approvals. We cannot assure you that consumers receiving our Products will not experience serious adverse events that require submission of post-marketing safety or medical device reports to the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Adverse events, including with respect to neurotoxin products and dermal fillers generally, may also negatively impact demand for our Products, which could result in reduced sales. We or Teoxane may also be required to update package inserts and consumer information brochures for our Products based on reports of adverse events or safety concerns, which could adversely affect acceptance of these Products in the market, make them less competitive or make commercialization of these Products more difficult or expensive.
We are currently, and in the future may be, subject to securities class action and stockholder derivative actions. These, and potential similar or related litigation, could result in substantial damages and may divert management’s time and attention from our business.
We are currently, and may in the future be, the target of securities class actions or stockholder derivative claims. On December 10, 2021, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain of its officers on behalf of a class of stockholders who acquired the Company’s securities from November 25, 2019 to October 11, 2021. The complaint alleges that the Company and certain of its officers violated sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making false or misleading statements regarding the manufacturing of DAXXIFY® and the timing and likelihood of regulatory approval and seeks unspecified monetary damages on behalf of the putative class and an award of costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. On January 23, 2023, we filed a motion to dismiss, but we cannot be certain of whether that motion to dismiss will be granted. We maintain director and officer’s insurance coverage and continue to engage in vigorous defense of the complaint. If we are not successful in our defense of the complaint, we could be forced to make significant payments to or other settlements with our stockholders and their lawyers outside of our insurance coverage, and such payments or settlement arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. This and any such other actions or claims could result in substantial damages and may divert management’s time and attention from our business and otherwise harm our business.
If product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our Products and any future products we develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability lawsuits as a result of commercializing our Products and the clinical testing of our Products, an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, or any other product candidates. For example, we may be sued if any product we develop allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we
may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our products. Even a successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims would require significant financial and management resources and may result in decreased demand for our Products or any future products we may develop and a loss of revenue; regulatory investigations, product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions; termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs; injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention; withdrawal of clinical trial participants or cancellation of clinical trials; and significant costs and diversion of management’s time to defend the related litigation.
Our inability to obtain and maintain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost and scope of coverage to protect against potential product liability claims could halt or inhibit the commercialization of our Products or any future products we develop. Although we maintain product liability insurance, any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our insurance policies also have various exclusions and deductibles, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. We will have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or that are not covered by our insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts. Moreover, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses.
As our business and operations continue to grow, we may need to expand our development, manufacturing, regulatory, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities. If and when we expand such capabilities, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.
In the future we may need to grow the number of employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of manufacturing, sales, marketing, distribution and other departments integral to growing our commercial infrastructure, including for potential expansion into the therapeutics market and internationally. If and when we experience such growth, we may be required to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such growth, if and when we determine to grow the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Any such expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.
As our operations expand, we will also need to manage additional relationships with various strategic partners, suppliers and other third parties. Our future financial performance and our ability to commercialize our Products and to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to manage any future growth effectively. Our failure to do so could prevent us from successfully growing our company.
We have, and may in the future, undertake restructuring plans to adjust our investment priorities and manage our operating expenses, which plans may not result in the savings or operational efficiencies anticipated and could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected.
In September 2023, we announced a plan to exit the Fintech Platform business. This plan was adopted because the significant costs and resources required to support the Fintech Platform no longer aligned with the Company’s capital allocation priorities. We announced that this plan would free up capital for reinvestment in other areas of our business. We may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits and savings from the exit of the Fintech Platform business due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs.
Our restructuring plans, including the exit of the Fintech Platform business, may adversely affect our ability to recruit and retain skilled and motivated personnel, may result in a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge, or inefficiency during transitional periods, may require a significant amount of employees’ time and focus, and may be distracting to employees, which may divert attention from operating and growing our business. The exit of the Fintech Platform business may also negatively impact relationships with our customers.
If we fail to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of any restructuring plans, including the exit of the Fintech Platform, if such activities negatively impact relationships with our customers or other stakeholders, or we are unable to
manage the related transition effectively, which may be impacted by factors outside of our control, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
If we are not successful in discovering, developing, acquiring and commercializing additional product candidates other than our Products, our ability to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives may be impaired.
Although a substantial amount of our effort has focused on the commercialization of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, and the continued clinical testing, regulatory approval and commercialization for DAXXIFY®, our strategy also includes the discovery, development and commercialization of other neuromodulator products for both aesthetic and therapeutic indications, including the onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar. We may seek to do so through our internal research programs, strategic collaborations and product acquisitions.
Even if we identify an appropriate collaboration or product acquisition, we may not be successful in negotiating the terms of the collaboration or acquisition, or effectively integrating the collaboration or acquired product into our existing business and operations. Moreover, we may not be able to pursue such opportunities if they fall within the non-compete provision of the Teoxane Agreement, which prohibits us from developing, manufacturing, marketing, selling, detailing or promoting any hyaluronic acid dermal filler (other than the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers) in the U.S. during the term of the Teoxane Agreement. We have limited experience in successfully acquiring and integrating products and technologies into our business and operations, and even if we are able to consummate an acquisition or other investment, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments. We may face risks, uncertainties and disruptions, including difficulties in the integration of the operations and services of these acquisitions. If we fail to successfully integrate collaborations, assets, products or technologies that we enter into or acquire, or if we fail to successfully exploit acquired product distribution rights and maintain acquired relationships with customers, our business could be harmed. In addition, in any collaboration, we would be dependent upon the success of the collaborators in performing their responsibilities and their continued cooperation. Our collaborators may not cooperate with us or perform their obligations under our agreements with them. Our collaborators may choose to pursue alternative technologies in preference to those being developed in collaboration with us. Furthermore, we may have to incur debt or issue equity securities in connection with proposed collaborations or to pay for any product acquisitions or investments, the issuance of which could be dilutive to our existing stockholders. Identifying, contemplating, negotiating or completing a collaboration or product acquisition and integrating an acquired product or technology could significantly divert management and employee time and resources.
Our onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar program is still in the preclinical stage and our other programs are in the discovery or preclinical state. Research programs to identify product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, whether or not any product candidates are ultimately identified. Our research and preclinical programs may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for many reasons, including the following:
•the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential product candidates;
•competitors may develop alternatives that render our product candidates obsolete or less attractive;
•product candidates we develop may nevertheless be covered by third parties’ patents or other exclusive rights;
•a product candidate may on further study be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate it is unlikely to be effective or otherwise does not meet applicable regulatory criteria;
•a product candidate may not be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all;
•a product candidate may not be accepted as safe and effective by consumers, the medical community or third-party payors, if applicable; and
•intellectual property rights of third parties may potentially block our entry into certain geographies or make such entry economically impracticable.
If we fail to develop and successfully commercialize products other than our Products, our future growth prospects may be harmed and our business will be more vulnerable to problems that we encounter in commercializing our Products, and in the continuing development of DAXXIFY®.
We have experienced and may experience in the future compromises or failures of our information technology systems or data, or those of third parties upon which we rely, which could adversely affect our business, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse consequences.
In the ordinary course of our business, we may collect, receive store, process, generate, use, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, share or otherwise process (collectively, “process”) proprietary, confidential, and sensitive data, including personal data (such as health-related data), intellectual property, and trade secrets (collectively, “sensitive information”).
We may rely upon and may share or receive sensitive data with or from third party service providers and technologies to operate critical business systems to process sensitive information in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, third-party providers of cloud-based infrastructure, encryption and authentication technology, employee email and other functions. We may also rely on third-party service providers to provide other products, services, parts, or otherwise to operate our business. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ cybersecurity practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place.
Our information technology systems could be damaged or interrupted by earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, power losses, computer system or data network failures, data corruption and security breaches or other cyber-based incidents, which we monitor and for which we maintain disaster recovery plans. Cyber incidents can include ransomware, and extortion, denial-of-service attacks, worms, and other malicious software programs introduced to our computers and networks, including intrusions that are disguised and evade detection for an extended period of time, phishing attacks, impersonation of authorized users, and efforts to discover and exploit any design flaws, bugs, security vulnerabilities or security weaknesses, as well as intentional or unintentional acts by employees or other insiders with access privileges, intentional acts of vandalism or fraud by third parties and sabotage. In addition, a variety of our software systems are cloud-based data management applications, hosted by third-party service providers whose security and information technology systems are subject to similar risks. Despite significant efforts to secure against such threats, it is impossible to entirely mitigate these risks. In the normal course of our business, we have experienced cyber-based incidents and expect we will experience them in the future. While to date, we do not believe such identified security events have been material to us, including to our reputation or business operations, or had a material financial impact, we cannot be certain that such incidents or future cyber incidents will not expose us to material costs and liability. These incidents and the failure to protect either our or our service providers’ information technology infrastructure could disrupt our operations or result in the loss or misuse of proprietary or confidential information, intellectual property or sensitive or personal information, harm to our employees, decreased sales, increased overhead costs, and product shortages, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.
We may expend significant resources or modify our business activities in an effort to protect against security incidents. Certain data privacy and security obligations may require us to implement and maintain specific security measures, industry-standard or reasonable security measures to protect our information technology systems and sensitive information. While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against security incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We may be unable to detect vulnerabilities in our information technology systems because such threats and techniques change frequently, are often sophisticated in nature, and may not be detected until after a security incident has occurred. Despite our efforts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities, if any, in our information technology systems, our efforts may not be successful. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities.
Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require us to notify relevant stakeholders of security incidents. Such notifications are costly, and the notifications or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences. If we (or a third party upon whom we rely) experience a security incident or are perceived to have experienced a security incident, we may experience adverse consequences. These consequences may include: government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or
oversight; restrictions on processing data (including personal data); litigation (including class action claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary expenditures; interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. Security incidents and attendant consequences may cause delays in the development of our product candidates, cause customers to stop using our Products, deter new customers from using our Products, and negatively impact our ability to grow and operate our business.
If we fail to attract and retain qualified management, clinical, scientific, technical and sales personnel, we may be unable to successfully execute our objectives.
Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical, scientific, technical and sales personnel. There is intense competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and we cannot be sure that we will be able to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary, particularly as business prospects change. The inability to recruit or loss of the services of key employees might impede the progress of our research, development and commercialization objectives.
Leadership transitions can be inherently difficult to manage. Resignations of executive officers may cause disruption in our business, strategic and employee relationships, which may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives. Leadership changes may also increase the likelihood of turnover of other key officers and employees and may cause declines in the productivity of existing employees. The search for a replacement officer may take time, further exacerbating these factors. Identifying and hiring an experienced and qualified executive officer are typically difficult. Periods of transition in senior management leadership are often difficult as the new executives gain detailed knowledge of our operations and may result in cultural differences and friction due to changes in strategy and style. During the transition periods, there may be uncertainty among investors, employees, creditors and others concerning our future direction and performance.
Risks Related to Marketing and Commercialization
Our Products may never achieve market acceptance or long-term commercial success.
Our Products may not continue to be commercially successful, which could harm our financial results and future prospects. The degree and rate of market acceptance of our Products depends on a number of factors, including:
•the safety, efficacy and duration of the product as compared to existing and future therapies;
•the clinical indications for which the product is approved and consumer demand or need for the treatment of those indications;
•our ability to establish or maintain a sufficient supply of approved products;
•acceptance by injectors, HCPs, major operators of clinics and consumers of the product as a safe and effective treatment;
•the extent to which injectors recommend the products to their consumers;
•the willingness of third-party payors to reimburse HCPs or patients for DAXXIFY® and any future products we may commercialize for therapeutic indications;
•the proper training and administration of the products by injectors, HCPs and medical staff such that consumers and patients do not experience excessive discomfort during treatment or adverse side effects;
•consumer and patient satisfaction with the results and administration of the product and overall treatment experience;
•the potential and perceived advantages and cost of the product over alternative treatments;
•the willingness of consumers to pay for the product and other aesthetic treatments in general, relative to other discretionary items, especially during economically challenging times;
•the revenue and profitability that the product will offer an injector and HCP as compared to alternative therapies;
•the relative convenience and ease of administration;
•the prevalence and severity of adverse events;
•the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts, including efforts by any third parties we engage;
•consumer sentiment about the benefits and risks of aesthetic procedures generally and our products in particular; and
•general consumer, patient, injector and HCP confidence with respect to our Products; and
•availability of practicing injectors for administration of our Products for aesthetic indications, which may be impacted by general economic and political conditions, including challenges affecting the global economy.
In addition, DAXXIFY®’s duration, safety and efficacy profile, as well as prescribing information, are based on the results achieved during clinical trials. Clinical trials are conducted in representative samples of the potential patient population and we have only conducted Phase 3 clinical trials for glabellar lines and cervical dystonia and Phase 2 trials for UFL, LCL, adult upper limb spasticity and plantar fasciitis. Therefore, the commercial experiences may yield different outcomes or consumer and patient experiences due to variations in injection techniques, dilution approaches and dosing levels employed by different injectors and HCPs or for other reasons. As a result, consumers and patients treated with DAXXIFY® may experience different duration, efficacy and safety results from what was experienced during clinical trials, which could negatively impact adoption.
Any failure by DAXXIFY® or any approved products to achieve and maintain market acceptance or commercial success would materially adversely affect our results of operations and delay, prevent or limit our ability to generate revenue and continue our business.
Our Products will face significant competition, and our failure to effectively compete may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration and expansion. In addition, our competitors may develop products that are safer, more effective, more convenient or less expensive than our Products, which could reduce or eliminate our commercial opportunity.
Successful competitors in the pharmaceutical and medical device markets have the ability to efficiently and effectively discover therapies, obtain patents, develop, test and obtain regulatory approvals for products, and effectively commercialize, market and promote approved products, including communicating the effectiveness, safety and value of products to actual and prospective customers and medical staff. Numerous companies are engaged in developing, patenting, manufacturing and marketing healthcare products which we expect will compete with our Products. Many of these competitors are large, experienced companies that enjoy significant competitive advantages, such as substantially greater financial, research and development, manufacturing, testing, personnel and marketing resources, greater brand recognition and more experience and expertise in obtaining marketing approvals from the FDA and other regulatory authorities. It is possible that competitors will succeed in developing technologies that are safer, more effective, more convenient, longer-lasting or that have a lower cost of goods and price than our Products, or that would render our technology obsolete or noncompetitive. Additionally, our competitors have greater existing market share in the aesthetics and therapeutics markets and long-standing practice and consumer loyalty and sales contracts with large practices which furthers their established business and financial relationships with practices, consumers and patients.
In the aesthetics market, competition is significant and dynamic and is characterized by substantial technological development and product innovations, and our competitors include large, fully-integrated pharmaceutical companies and more established biotechnology and medical device companies. We anticipate that DAXXIFY® will face significant competition from existing injectable neuromodulators as well as unapproved and off-label treatments in the U.S. and abroad. Further, in the future we may face competition for DAXXIFY® from biosimilar products and products based upon botulinum
toxin. The RHA® Collection of dermal fillers also competes with other approved dermal filler products in a marketplace characterized by the continuous introduction of products with new intended uses and expanded labels. Competitors may also try to compete with us on price both directly, through rebates and promotional programs to high volume injectors and coupons or loyalty programs to consumers, and indirectly, through attractive product bundling with complementary products, such as dermal fillers that offer convenience and an effectively lower price compared to the total price of purchasing each product separately. For a variety of reasons, including less stringent regulatory requirements, there are significantly more aesthetic products and procedures available for use in a number of foreign countries than are approved for use in the U.S. There are also fewer limitations on the claims that our competitors in certain countries can make about the effectiveness of their products and the manner in which they can market them. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to compete with aesthetic products available in these markets.
In the therapeutics market, the key competitive factors affecting the success of DAXXIFY®, are likely to include efficacy, duration of effect, safety, convenience, availability, price and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors.
If we are unable to compete effectively, our future sales growth may be affected, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be successful in executing our sales and marketing strategy for the commercialization of our Products.
We have limited prior experience in the marketing, sale and distribution of aesthetic products and no experience with the marketing, sale and distribution of therapeutic products or any products internationally. Establishing and maintaining sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities involve significant risks, including our ability to retain and incentivize qualified individuals, provide adequate training to sales and marketing personnel, generate sufficient sales leads, effectively manage a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team, and handle any unforeseen costs and expenses.
We have established and scaled a commercial sales and marketing organization to support the commercialization of our Products for aesthetics. We are also expanding our commercial team to support the commercialization of DAXXIFY® for the treatment of cervical dystonia. Any failure or delay in or complications from the expansion of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities could adversely impact the commercialization of our Products and to the extent such failure, delay or complications impact the commercialization of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers may result in a breach of our obligations to Teoxane under the Teoxane Agreement.
We also have to compete with other pharmaceutical and life sciences companies to recruit, hire, train and retain sales and marketing personnel, and turnover in our sales force and marketing personnel could negatively affect the commercialization of our Products. We may not be able to attract and retain quality personnel on acceptable terms, or at all. Also, to the extent we hire personnel from our competitors, such personnel will usually be subject to restrictive covenants with their former employers, including non-competition, non-solicitation and/or confidentiality provisions. As a result, we may have to wait until applicable non-competition provisions have expired before deploying such personnel in restricted territories or incur costs to relocate personnel outside of such territories. We may be subject to allegations and litigation that these personnel have violated the non-competition clauses, been improperly solicited or divulged to us proprietary or other confidential information of their former employers. Any of these risks may adversely affect our business.
We will also need to increase our commercial team or contract with distributors and partners to expand internationally. If we are unable to effectively expand our commercial team or enter into such arrangements on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize DAXXIFY® internationally.
Establishing and maintaining sales, marketing and distribution capabilities may be expensive and time consuming. Such expenses may be disproportionate compared to the revenues we may be able to generate on sales of our Products, which could cause our commercialization efforts to be unprofitable or less profitable than expected.
We are subject to uncertainty relating to pricing and reimbursement. Failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage, pricing and reimbursement for DAXXIFY for therapeutics uses, or our other future approved products, if any, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to commercialize such products.
The availability and extent of coverage and reimbursement from governmental and private healthcare payors for DAXXIFY® for therapeutic uses or any future approved product for therapeutic indications, and our ability to obtain adequate pricing for such products are key factors that will affect our future commercial prospects. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which drugs they will cover and establish payment levels. Sales of our products depend and will depend substantially on the extent to which their cost will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar healthcare management organizations or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payors. Accordingly, the coverage and reimbursement decisions of such governmental and private healthcare payors could reduce the demand for, or the price paid for, our products. If these payors do not consider our products to be cost-effective alone, or relative to other approved therapies, they may not cover our products or, if they do, they may apply utilization management restrictions, high patient cost-sharing obligations, or restrict the level of reimbursement. The approved reimbursement amount may be insufficient to establish or maintain pricing sufficient to realize a return on our investment.
Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for pharmaceuticals products, and many also limit reimbursement for newly-approved products and indications. Third-party payors often attempt to contain healthcare costs by demanding price discounts or rebates and limiting both the types and variety of drugs that they will cover and the amounts that they will pay for drugs. As a result, they may not provide adequate payment for our products. Similarly, the containment of healthcare costs has become a priority for federal and state governments and the pricing of pharmaceutical products has been a focus in this effort. The U.S. government and state legislatures have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement, requirements for substitution of generic products and requirements to demonstrate a specific degree of improvement in terms of medical benefit compared to existing therapies. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures could adversely affect our ability to successfully commercialize our products. In addition, we may be required to conduct post-marketing studies in order to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of our products to payors’ satisfaction. Such studies might require us to commit a significant amount of management’s time and our financial and other resources and our products might not ultimately be considered cost-effective.
The IRA makes significant changes to how drugs are covered and paid for under the Medicare program, including the creation of financial penalties for drugs whose prices rise faster than the rate of inflation, redesign of the Medicare Part D program to require manufacturers to bear more of the liability for certain drug benefits, and government price-setting for certain Medicare Part D drugs, starting in 2026, and Medicare Part B drugs starting in 2028. We have evaluated, and will continue to evaluate, the effect of the IRA on our business. At this time, we do not expect the IRA to have a material effect.
We do not know if DAXXIFY® for therapeutic purposes will obtain and maintain broad acceptance from third-party payors. The coverage determination process is a time-consuming and costly process that requires us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of DAXXIFY® to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage will be obtained or maintained. The market for a drug depends significantly on access to third party payors’ drug formularies, or lists of medications for which third-party payors provide coverage and reimbursement. Third-party payors may refuse to include a particular drug in their formularies or restrict patient access to a branded drug when a less costly generic equivalent or other alternative is available, even if not approved for the indication for which the branded drug is approved. Due to there being no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement in the U.S. among commercial payors, coverage and reimbursement for pharmaceutical products may differ significantly from payor to payor. If we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate coverage from third-party payors, the adoption of DAXXIFY® by HCPs and patients may be limited. This in turn could affect our ability to successfully commercialize DAXXIFY® and have a material adverse impact on our profitability, results of operations, financial condition and future success.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain and maintain adequate coverage, pricing and reimbursement for DAXXIFY®, or our other future approved products, if any. If coverage or reimbursement is not available or is available on a limited basis, or if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate pricing, we may not be able to successfully commercialize DAXXIFY® or our other future approved products, if any.
Even if coverage and reimbursement from governmental and private healthcare payors for therapeutic uses of DAXXIFY® or any future approved product for therapeutic indications is provided, acceptance of any approved product may vary among HCPs, healthcare organizations and administrators and others in the healthcare
community, which could impact our ability to realize a return on our investment and reduce demand for our products.
The market acceptance of any approved product, including DAXXIFY®, may vary among HCPs, patients, administrators, or others in the healthcare community. In addition, regional hospitals and healthcare organizations are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine which suppliers as well as which pharmaceutical and therapeutic products will be included in their drug formularies or lists of medications approved for use in their facility. The administration of regional hospitals and healthcare organizations may refuse to include a particular drug in their formularies or restrict patient access to a branded drug when a less costly generic equivalent or other alternative is available. These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products or put pressure on our product pricing.
HCPs play a significant role in determining the course of a patient’s treatment and the type of pharmaceutical and therapeutic products that are included on drug formularies and lists of medications approved for use within their healthcare organizations. An important part of our commercialization process includes the education of HCPs on the safe and effective use of any approved product, including DAXXIFY®, as applicable. Acceptance of any approved product, including DAXXIFY®, depends on educating HCPs regarding the distinctive characteristics, perceived benefits, safety, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness of the product as compared to our competitors’ products. If an HCP experiences difficulties during an initial procedure or otherwise, that HCP may be less likely to continue to use our product or to recommend it to other HCPs and healthcare administrators. Our efforts to educate HCPs, patients, administrators, and others in the healthcare community on the proper use of any approved product, including DAXXIFY®, have required, and will continue to require, significant resources, and these efforts may never be successful. If we are not successful in educating HCPs, we may be unable to increase sales, sustain growth, or achieve profitability.
Unfavorable publicity relating to one or more of our product offerings, whether related to aesthetic or therapeutic indications, may affect the public perception of our entire portfolio of Products.
DAXXIFY® has been approved for both aesthetic and therapeutic indications. Concerns about product safety, efficacy or duration for any DAXXIFY® indication or the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, whether raised by an injector, HCP, consumer, patient, litigant, regulator or consumer advocate, can result in safety alerts, product recalls, governmental investigations, regulatory action, private claims and lawsuits, payment of fines and settlements, declining sales and reputational damage for the entire portfolio of our Products, potentially impacting any approved DAXXIFY® indications and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. If any such events occur, the negative publicity could negatively impact our brand and results of operations.
If we are found to have improperly promoted off-label uses for our Products that are approved for marketing, or if HCPs or injectors misuse our Products or use our Products off-label, we may become subject to prohibitions on the sale or marketing of our Products, significant fines, penalties, and sanctions, product liability claims, and our image and reputation within the industry and marketplace could be harmed.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate the marketing and promotional claims that are made about regulated products. In particular, a product may not be promoted for uses or indications that are not approved by the FDA or such other regulatory agencies as reflected in the product’s approved labeling. We train our sales and marketing personnel against improperly promoting off-label uses for our Products. However, if we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may receive warning letters, become subject to significant liability and be subject to FDA prohibitions on the sale or marketing of our Products, which could affect our reputation within the industry and materially harm our business. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. If we become the target of such an investigation or prosecution based on our marketing and promotional practices, we could face similar sanctions, which would materially harm our business. In addition, management’s attention could be diverted from our business operations, significant legal expenses could be incurred, and our reputation could be damaged. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed.
Injectors and HCPs may, in their independent professional judgment, use legally available products for off-label uses. However, injectors and HCPs may also misuse our Products, or use improper techniques, potentially leading to adverse results, side effects or injury, which may lead to product liability claims. If our Products are misused or used with improper
technique, we may become subject to costly litigation by our customers, consumers or patients. Product liability claims could divert management’s attention from our core business, be expensive to defend, and result in sizable damage awards against us that may not be covered by insurance. Furthermore, the use of these products for indications other than those cleared by the FDA may not effectively treat such conditions, which could harm our reputation in the marketplace among injectors, HCPs and consumers.
Any of these events could harm our business and results of operations and cause our stock price to decline.
We generally rely on one third-party service provider for the distribution of our Products to our customers. If we experienced a sudden loss of our third-party distributor or such distributor experiences a disruption in its operations, it would affect the delivery of our Products to our customers, which could negatively impact our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
We currently rely on third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions related to the packaging, storage and distribution of DAXXIFY® and the storage and distribution of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. Traditionally, we have relied on one third-party service provider for inventory and shipment of Product to our customers, and we generally expect the sole service provider arrangement to continue in the near term. We cannot guarantee that any existing relationship will be maintained or that the third-party service provider will continue to be available to us. The sudden loss of our third-party service provider or disruptions in their operations, could impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, we may not be able to find a replacement third-party service provider in a timely fashion or on commercially reasonably terms.
A significant disruption to the business of our third-party service provider or interruption in the operation of their facility used for our Products due to public health crises, changes to existing systems, use of other facilities, natural disasters, severe weather, accidents, system failures, cybersecurity incidents, capacity constraints or other unforeseen causes could delay, impair or prevent our third-party service provider from delivering our Products to our customers. The delay could negatively impact customer satisfaction and the extent to which customers use our Products, which could impact our commercial success.
Additionally, we recognize revenue from the sale of our Products once they are delivered to our customers. Any delay in the delivery of our Products could push the revenue recognition for those Products to the following quarter, impacting the financial results of the current quarter. Further, due to seasonality trends, a significant portion of our revenue is received in the fourth quarter of the year. Any disruption or delay in the delivery of our Products during the fourth quarter could impact our year end results in addition to quarterly performance.
Risks Related to the Manufacturing and Supply Chain
We face certain risks associated with manufacturing DAXXIFY® to support commercial production for any approved indications.
Our success depends in part on our ability to effectively and reliably forecast the demand and manufacture or source supplies of DAXXIFY® to meet commercial demand, and for us and our third-party manufacturers to maintain a commercially viable manufacturing process. We have developed an integrated manufacturing, research and development facility located at our Newark, California office, which is available for commercial and clinical production of DAXXIFY®, to support the development and commercialization of DAXXIFY®, for the Fosun partnership. We also manufacture drug substance at this facility, which is used for research and development purposes, clinical trials and/or commercial production.
In support of the commercialization of DAXXIFY®, we are outsourcing some manufacturing responsibilities to our third-party manufacturers. In April 2023, the FDA approved our PAS submission for the ABPS manufacturing facility. Following approval, the ABPS manufacturing facility began serving as our primary commercial drug product supply source for DAXXIFY®. In addition, the PCI manufacturing facility will need regulatory approval before it can be used to support commercialization. There are no assurances that the PCI manufacturing facility will get approved on a timely basis, or at all, or that either or both ABPS and PCI will continue to be available to us at the required commercial scale, or at all. In addition, there are risks associated with commercial manufacturing including, among others, cost overruns, process reproducibility, stability issues, lot consistency and timely availability of raw materials. If these or other risks materialize or we are unable to utilize our third-party manufacturers, we may encounter delays or additional costs in achieving our commercialization objectives, which could materially damage our business and financial position.
We use our internal manufacturing facility and an external manufacturing facility to make our DAXXIFY® drug substance and drug product. We plan to utilize these facilities and potentially additional external facilities to support clinical and commercial production of DAXXIFY® and any product candidates. If we experience a significant disruption in our manufacturing operations or our third-party manufacturers experience a significant disruption in their operations for any reason, our ability to continue to operate our business would be materially harmed.
We use our internal manufacturing facility and the ABPS manufacturing facility to manufacture DAXXIFY® drug substance and drug product. We plan to utilize our internal and the external ABPS facility, as well as PCI facility, if approved for the clinical and commercial production of DAXXIFY® and any product candidates. If these or any future facility were to be damaged, destroyed or otherwise unable to operate, whether due to earthquakes, fire, floods, hurricanes, storms, tornadoes, other natural disasters, employee malfeasance, terrorist acts, power outages, actual or threatened epidemics, pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic), outbreaks, or public health crises, equipment failures or otherwise, or if performance of such manufacturing facilities is disrupted for any other reason, such an event could make it difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us or our third-party manufacturers to continue to manufacture our drug product and/or drug substance for a substantial period of time. In particular, because we manufacture botulinum toxin in our facilities, we would be required to obtain further clearance and approval by state, federal or other applicable authorities to continue or resume manufacturing activities. Although we have disaster recovery and business continuity plans in place, they may not be adequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which, particularly when taken together with our lack of earthquake insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may also need to halt manufacturing operations, which could impact FDA inspections, halt or delay our clinical trials or prevent the manufacture of DAXXIFY® for commercialization. If we experience delays in achieving our development or regulatory objectives, or if we are unable to manufacture an approved product within a timeframe that meets market demands, our business, prospects, financial results and reputation could be materially harmed.
We currently contract with third-party manufacturers for certain components and services necessary to produce our products and expect to continue to do so to support further clinical trials and commercial scale production. This increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our products or be able to obtain such quantities or services at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.
We plan to utilize our internal and the external ABPS and PCI manufacturing facilities for drug product and drug substance production and testing, and we use other service providers for testing and the production of raw materials and
excipients to support the clinical and commercial production of our products. For example, we and our manufacturers purchase the materials necessary to produce DAXXIFY® from single-source third-party suppliers, which includes the development, manufacture and supply of bulk peptide. There are no assurances that the bulk peptide manufacturer will continue to be available to us or be able to continue to supply us at the required commercial scale, or at all. There are a limited number of suppliers for the bulk peptide and raw materials that we use to manufacture our products. Any significant delay in the supply of such components or the inability to purchase these components on acceptable terms and at sufficient quality levels or in adequate quantities could delay or halt commercial activities, clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval. We may need to assess alternate suppliers to prevent a possible disruption of the manufacture of the materials necessary to produce a product for commercial sale or clinical trials.
There is no guarantee as to if or when we may establish or rely on new and additional suppliers or service providers to support clinical development or commercialization of our products, or whether they will be adequate in all circumstances we may encounter. Even where alternative sources of supply or other service providers are available, qualifying alternate suppliers and service providers and establishing reliable supplies could cost more or could result in delays and a loss of revenues. For instance, we outsource the manufacture of bulk peptide through an agreement with a single supplier. Although we have multiple years of released inventory on hand, we do not know whether such stock will be sufficient to meet projected demand and may need to identify a second source of supply. Even if we are able to identify and qualify a suitable second source to replace the peptide supplier, if necessary, that replacement supplier would not have access to our previous supplier’s proprietary processes and would therefore be required to develop its own, which could result in further delay. As a result, we are dependent on a limited number of suppliers and service providers for our products and the loss of one of our suppliers or service providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails other additional risks, including the reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance, the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party, and the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us. In addition, third-party manufacturers may not be able to comply with cGMP or QSR, or similar regulatory requirements outside the U.S. Our failure or the failure of our third-party manufacturers to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our product candidates or products that we may develop. Any failure or refusal to supply the components or services for our product candidates or products that we may develop could delay, prevent or impair our clinical development, regulatory approval or commercialization efforts.
We rely on Teoxane for the manufacture and supply of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, and our dependence on Teoxane may impair our ability to commercialize the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers.
Pursuant to the Teoxane Agreement, we are not entitled to manufacture the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. Instead, Teoxane is responsible for supplying our entire supply of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers. If Teoxane were to cease production or otherwise fail to timely supply us with an adequate supply of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, our ability to continue to commercialize the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers would be adversely affected.
Teoxane is required to produce the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers under QSR in order to meet acceptable standards for commercial sale. Teoxane is subject to pre-approval inspections and periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign authorities to ensure strict compliance with QSR and other applicable government regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We do not have control over Teoxane’s compliance with these regulations and standards. Any difficulties or delays in Teoxane’s manufacturing and supply of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers or any failure of Teoxane to maintain compliance with the applicable regulations and standards could increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue, prevent the import and/or export of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, impair Teoxane’s ability to produce the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers on the schedule we require to meet commercialization goals, or cause the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers to be the subject of field alerts, recalls or market withdrawals.
Our business involves the use of hazardous materials and we and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers must comply with environmental laws and regulations, which can be expensive and restrict how we do business.
Our sales, marketing, research and development and manufacturing activities and our third-party manufacturers’ and suppliers’ activities involve the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials owned by us, including botulinum toxin type A, a key component of our product candidates, and other hazardous compounds. In some cases, these hazardous materials and various wastes resulting from their use are stored at our facilities and our manufacturers' facilities pending their use and disposal. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are subject to laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. We are licensed with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and with the California Department of Health, Food and Drug Branch for use of botulinum toxin and to manufacture both the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the finished product in topical and injectable dose forms.
Although we believe that our safety procedures are sufficient and comply with the standards prescribed by applicable laws and regulations, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury, which may cause an interruption of our commercialization efforts, research and development efforts or business operations, as well as environmental damage resulting in costly clean-up and liabilities. Such damages and liability could exceed our resources and federal or state, local or other applicable authorities may curtail our use of certain materials and interrupt our business operations.
Furthermore, environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent. We cannot predict the impact of such changes and cannot be certain of our future compliance.
Risks Related to Research and Development
Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results.
Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Furthermore, we rely on CROs, and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials. While we have agreements governing the committed activities of our CROs, we have limited influence over their actual performance. A failure of one or more of our clinical trials can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Furthermore, final results may differ from interim results.
Clinical trials can be prevented, delayed or aborted for a variety of reasons, including delay or failure to:
•obtain regulatory approval to commence a trial;
•reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
•obtain IRB approval at each site;
•recruit suitable subjects to participate in a trial;
•have subjects complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;
•ensure clinical sites observe trial protocol or continue to participate in a trial;
•address any patient safety concerns that arise during the course of a trial;
•address any conflicts with new or existing laws or regulations;
•add a sufficient number of clinical trial sites;
•manufacture sufficient quantities of a product candidate for use in clinical trials; or
•lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.
We have and may again experience delays in our clinical trials, and we do not know whether future clinical trials, if any, will begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll an adequate number of subjects on time or be completed on schedule, if at all. Subject enrollment is a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials and is affected by many factors, including the size and nature of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, competing clinical trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs or treatments that may be approved for the indications we are investigating. There is no guarantee that we can identify, recruit and maintain subjects as participants in a clinical trial in order for the trial to be completed.
We could also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by the data safety monitoring board for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may suspend or terminate a clinical trial due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, failure of inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, discovery of unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions, risks related to conducting clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.
Delays in the completion or termination of any clinical trial of our product candidates will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. In addition, many of the factors that cause or lead to a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects.
We have historically relied on third parties and consultants to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties or consultants do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize DAXXIFY® for additional indications or any future product candidates, on a timely basis, or at all.
We rely on medical institutions, clinical investigators, contract laboratories, collaborative partners and other third parties, such as CROs and clinical data management organizations, to conduct clinical trials on our product candidates. The third parties with whom we contract for execution of our clinical trials play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. However, these third parties are not our employees, and except for contractual duties and obligations, we have limited ability to control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. Although we typically rely on these third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with its investigational plan and protocol. Moreover, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with GCPs and good laboratory practices for conducting, monitoring, recording and reporting the results of clinical and preclinical trials to ensure that the data and results are scientifically credible and accurate, and that the trial subjects are adequately informed of the potential risks of participating in clinical trials. We also rely on consultants to assist in the execution, including data collection and analysis, of our clinical trials.
In addition, the execution of preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the subsequent compilation and analysis of the data produced, requires coordination among various parties. In order for these functions to be carried out effectively and efficiently, it is imperative that these parties communicate and coordinate with one another. Moreover, these third parties may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. These third parties may terminate their agreements with us upon as little as 30 days’ prior written notice of a material breach by us that is not cured within 30 days. Many of these agreements may also be terminated by such third parties under certain other circumstances, including our insolvency or our failure to comply with applicable laws. In general, these agreements require such third parties to reasonably cooperate with us at our expense for an orderly winding down of services of such third parties under the agreements. If the third parties or consultants conducting our clinical trials do not perform their contractual duties or obligations, experience work stoppages, do not meet expected deadlines, terminate their agreements with us or need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical trial protocols or GCPs, or for any other reason, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials or enter into new arrangements, which could be difficult, costly or impossible, and our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated or
may need to be repeated. We may be unable to recover unused funds from these third-parties. If any of the foregoing were to occur, we may not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, regulatory approval for, and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize the product candidate being tested in such trials.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
If our efforts to protect our intellectual property related to our Products or any future products are not adequate, we may not be able to compete effectively.
Our success and ability to compete depends significantly upon our ability to obtain, maintain and protect our proprietary rights and licensed intellectual property rights to the technologies and inventions used in or embodied by our Products. We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to DAXXIFY® and the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, our onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, and our development programs. We also have not pursued or maintained, and may not pursue or maintain in the future, patent protection for our products in every country or territory in which we sell or will in the future sell our products. Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thereby eroding our competitive position.
The strength of patents in the biotechnology field involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. This uncertainty includes changes to the patent laws through either legislative or court action that may reinterpret existing law in ways affecting the scope or validity of issued patents. The evolving law relating to patent eligibility for patents related to our business may be relevant to the scope of protection available to us. The patent applications that we own or license may fail to result in issued patents in the U.S. or foreign countries. Competitors and academic scientists in the field of cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and neuromodulators, for example, have created a substantial amount of prior art, including scientific publications, patents and patent applications. Our ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents depends on whether the differences between our technology and the prior art allow our technology to be patentable over the prior art. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties are currently challenging and may again challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of such issued patents or any other issued patents we own or license, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. For example, in November 2022, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. opposed our European Patent No. EP 3 368 071 for “Injectable botulinum toxin formulations and methods of use thereof having long duration of therapeutic or cosmetic effect.” We responded to their opposition in March 2023.We will vigorously defend this patent in the European Patent Office; however, we cannot guarantee that it will be upheld.
Third parties may challenge the validity of any issued U.S. Patent in the USPTO through the post-grant review process on the basis of prior art patents or printed publications. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in the USPTO compared to district courts, third parties may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our patent claims that would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to DAXXIFY®, an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar or any future product candidates is challenged, then it could threaten our ability to prevent competitive products from being marketed.
Even where laws provide protection, costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce, defend and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and the outcome of such litigation would be uncertain. Moreover, any actions we may bring to enforce our intellectual property against our competitors could provoke them to bring counterclaims against us. Some of our competitors have substantially greater intellectual property portfolios and financial resources than we have. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors—If we infringe or are alleged to infringe intellectual property rights of third parties, our business could be harmed” for more information. Furthermore, even if our patents and applications are unchallenged, they may not adequately protect our intellectual property or prevent others from designing around our claims.
We also rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that may not be patentable, processes for which patents may be difficult to obtain or enforce and any other elements of our product development and manufacturing processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents.
In an effort to protect our trade secrets and other confidential information, we require our employees, consultants, collaborators and advisers to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of their relationships with us. These agreements require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not be disclosed to third parties. These agreements, however, may not provide us with adequate protection against improper use or disclosure of confidential information, and these agreements may be breached. Adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information. A breach of confidentiality could significantly affect our competitive position. In addition, in some situations, these agreements may conflict with, or be subject to, the rights of third parties with whom our employees, consultants, collaborators or advisers have previous employment or consulting relationships. To the extent that our employees, consultants or contractors use any intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in any related or resulting know-how and inventions. Also, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and other confidential information.
If we infringe or are alleged to infringe intellectual property rights of third parties, our business could be harmed.
Our research, development, manufacturing and commercialization activities may infringe or otherwise violate or be claimed to infringe or otherwise violate patents owned or controlled by other parties. Competitors in the field of cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and botulinum toxin have developed large portfolios of patents and patent applications in fields relating to our business. For example, there are patents held by third parties that relate to the treatment with botulinum toxin-based products for indications we are currently developing. There may also be patent applications that have been filed but not published that, when issued as patents, could be asserted against us. These third parties could bring claims against us that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successful against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement suit were brought against us, we could be forced to stop or delay research, development, manufacturing or sales of the product or product candidate that is the subject of the suit.
For example, in October 2021, Allergan filed a complaint against us and ABPS, one of our manufacturing sources of DAXXIFY®, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of the following patents assigned and/or licensed to Allergan, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,033,625; 7,354,740; 8,409,828; 11,124,786; and 7,332,567. Allergan later amended its complaint alleging infringement of four additional patents assigned and/or licensed to Allergan, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,147,878; 11,203,748; 11,326,155; and 11,285,216. On September 15, 2023, U.S. Patent No. 7,332,567 was dismissed from the case. See Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” for more information. Allergan claims that our formulation for DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection and our and ABPS’s manufacturing process used to produce DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection infringes its patents. We dispute the claims in this lawsuit and intend to defend the matter vigorously. However, there can be no assurance that the court will not rule against us in these proceedings. Even if we are successful in defending against such claim, this litigation could divert management’s attention, as well as our resources, from our business and any claims paid out of our cash reserves would harm our financial condition and operating results. As a result of patent infringement claims, or to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be required to seek licenses from third parties. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we are able to obtain a license, the license would likely obligate us to pay license fees or royalties or both, and the rights granted to us might be nonexclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a product based on our current or future indications, or be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations, if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms.
There has been substantial litigation and other proceedings regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry. In addition to infringement claims against us, we may become a party to other patent litigation and other proceedings, including interference, derivation or post-grant proceedings declared or granted by the USPTO and similar proceedings in foreign countries, regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our current or future products. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could impair our
ability to compete in the marketplace. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If Teoxane fails to obtain and maintain patents, licensing arrangements or other protection for the proprietary intellectual property that we have exclusive distribution rights to in the U.S., we could lose our rights related to the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, which would have a material adverse effect on our potential to generate revenue, our business prospects, and our results of operations.
If Teoxane fails to obtain and maintain patent, licensing arrangements or other protection for the proprietary intellectual property that we have exclusive distribution rights to in the U.S., we could lose our rights to the intellectual property or our exclusivity with respect to those rights, and our competitors could market competing products using the intellectual property. The intellectual property underlying the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers is of critical importance to our business and involves complex legal, business and scientific issues and is complicated by the rapid pace of scientific discovery in our industry. Disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to the Teoxane Agreement, including:
•the scope of rights granted under the Teoxane Agreement and other interpretation-related issues;
•the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of Teoxane that is not subject to the Teoxane Agreement;
•the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our collaborative development relationships; and
•the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the development of intellectual property under the Teoxane Agreement.
If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected products or product candidates.
We may become involved in lawsuits or administrative proceedings to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property or the patents of our licensors, or to challenge patent claims of third party patents which could be expensive and time-consuming.
Competitors may infringe upon our intellectual property, including our patents or the patents of our licensors. As a result, we may in the future be required to file infringement claims to stop third-party infringement or unauthorized use of our own or licensed intellectual property. This can be expensive, particularly for a company of our size, and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patent claims do not cover its technology or that the factors necessary to grant an injunction against an infringer are not satisfied.
An adverse determination of any litigation or other proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing.
Interference, derivation, inter partes review, post-grant review or other proceedings brought at the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priority or patentability of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors or collaborators, or those of our competitors. However, we cannot guarantee that those proceedings will be successful. For example, we filed two petitions (IPR2021-01203 and IPR2021-01204) requesting IPR of Medy-Tox’s U.S. Patent No. 9,480,731, titled “Long Lasting Effect of New Botulinum Toxin Formulations” and the USPTO Trial and Appeal Board denied institution of the IPRs. Although the IPR proceedings were not successful, we continue to take appropriate measures to defend our patent position, which may include future IPR proceedings, litigation or other USPTO proceedings, any of which may fail or may be invoked against us by third parties.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation or other proceedings, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation or proceeding. In addition, during the course of this kind of litigation or proceeding, there could
be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments or public access to related documents. If investors perceive these results to be negative, the market price for our common stock could be significantly harmed.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
We do not have intellectual property rights in all foreign countries in which a market may exist. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the U.S. can be less extensive than those in the U.S. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the U.S. and in some cases may even force us to grant a compulsory license to competitors or other third parties. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the U.S., or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the U.S. or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies to develop their own products in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the U.S. These products may compete with our products and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing. Periodically, we may review the patents and patent applications we have pending throughout the world and decide to abandon one or more of them if we determine such patents or applications would not make a strategic contribution to our business.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful.
Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.
In addition, our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights may be adversely affected by unforeseen changes in domestic and foreign intellectual property laws.
Risks Related to Government and Industry Regulation
Our business and Products are subject to extensive government regulation.
We are subject to extensive, complex, costly and evolving regulation by federal, state, and local governmental authorities in the U.S., principally the FDA, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as foreign regulatory authorities. Compliance with laws affecting the manufacture, promotion, and sale of current Products and the discovery, development, and introduction of new products or new Product uses requires substantial ongoing effort and expense. Failure to comply with applicable requirements, including those promulgated under the FDCA, the Public Health Service Act, and the Controlled Substances Act in the U.S., and similar laws that vary by country, may subject us to delay, remediation costs, adverse publicity, operating or distribution restrictions, disciplinary actions including warning letters or similar communications of admonition, Product seizures, recalls, monetary penalties, injunctions, suspension or revocation of approvals, criminal prosecution, or exclusion from future participation in federal healthcare programs.
The regulatory approval process is highly uncertain and we or any collaboration partner may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for the manufacture or commercialization of DAXXIFY® for new indications, the RHA® Pipeline Products or any future product candidates, or to obtain regulatory approval on our desired timelines.
The research, development, testing, regulatory review, and approval of new products and new product uses are subject to extensive regulation. In addition to the regulatory authorities described above, product development may be subject to requirements for authorization and continuing oversight by institutional review boards/ethics committees and other local boards. Generally, relevant regulatory and institutional authorities must approve a nonclinical study or clinical research before it may commence. Then a regulatory authority must authorize a product for proposed conditions of use before it may be commercialized. Obtaining regulatory approvals can be a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process, requirements can change over time, and delay or failure can occur at any stage of the process.
Failure to comply with FDA and other applicable U.S. and foreign regulatory requirements may subject us to the range of administrative or judicially imposed sanctions or other actions. See the section titled “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Government and Industry Regulation – Our business and Products are subject to extensive government regulation” for additional information about consequences of non-compliance.
Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a product in the U.S. or abroad, we or our collaborators must demonstrate with substantial evidence from well controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory agencies, that such product candidates are safe and effective, or safe, pure and potent, for their intended uses. Results from nonclinical studies and clinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Deficiencies can occur in the conduct of nonclinical studies and clinical trials. Even if we believe the data for our product candidates are reliable and promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, or approval to the extent desired. Furthermore, administering product candidates to humans may produce unexpected results or undesirable side effects, which could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials or result in the FDA or other regulatory authorities denying approval of a product candidate for any or all targeted indications.
Even with positive clinical trial results, there is risk that the FDA or other regulatory authority identifies deficiencies or questions related to the manufacturing process of our products. For example, in 2021, the FDA delayed DAXXIFY® GL Approval following its identification of observations at its onsite inspection at our manufacturing facility. Although we were subsequently granted DAXXIFY® GL Approval, in order to meet future commercial demand, we will need to rely on one or more third-party manufacturing partners, which requires their successful completion of an inspection and FDA prior approval of a supplemental filing to our BLA. Although the ABPS facility has received FDA approval, we cannot be certain of how quickly or successfully the regulatory approval process will proceed for additional manufacturing sites.
In addition, we could experience issues during manufacturing inspections that could cause us or our manufacturing partners to undergo reinspections, as was the case with the process for the DAXXIFY® GL Approval. Depending on the circumstances, the timing to complete remediation of issues identified and then a reinspection can be lengthy. Even upon reinspection, it is not guaranteed that a facility or its systems and processes will be found adequate.
Regulators can delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons, including the following:
•our inability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory body that the product candidate is safe and effective, or safe, pure and potent, for the requested conditions of use;
•our inability to establish that our data, including data collected for us by third parties, are properly collected, reliable, and reproducible;
•our inability to remedy identified deficiencies or demonstrate viable manufacturing processes, or similar issues affecting third-party manufacturers with which we contract;
•the FDA’s or foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement with the trial protocol or the interpretation of data from nonclinical studies or clinical trials;
•our inability to demonstrate that clinical and other benefits of the product candidate outweigh any safety or other perceived risks;
•the FDA’s or applicable foreign regulatory agency’s requirement for additional preclinical or clinical studies;
•the FDA’s or applicable foreign regulatory agency’s non-approval of the formulation, quality control, labeling, or the specifications of the product candidate;
•the inability of the FDA to audit key clinical sites used in the development of the product for unapproved indications;
•competitor products may secure data or marketing exclusivity that delays our product approval or market entry; or
•the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory agency significantly change in a manner rendering our data insufficient for approval.
The RHA® Collection of dermal fillers are Class III medical devices that require PMA approval before they may be commercialized in the U.S. Although our partner Teoxane has received PMA approval for the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, any future development of RHA® Pipeline Products will require approval.
If we are unable to gain approval of DAXXIFY® for additional indications or any future product candidates on a timely basis or at all, or if our prior approval supplement filing for our third-party manufacturing partner is not approved on a timely basis or at all, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely harmed.
Our Products remain subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory oversight even though approved, which may result in significant additional expense, may limit or delay additional regulatory approvals, may subject us to penalties, and may result in withdrawal of regulatory approval if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements.
After our products receive regulatory approval, we, Teoxane and our manufacturing partners, remain subject to the applicable laws as well as post-marketing surveillance. We must perform periodic inspection of facilities, continuing review of production processes, testing of products, and monitoring and reporting obligations to confirm that we are in compliance with all applicable requirements, including product specifications. New information is expected to be developed post-approval, following more diverse consumer exposures and longer time in use, as well as due to changes in manufacturing and production experience over time. Adverse findings may result in quality or other investigations, labeling revisions, the implementation of REMS or other control programs, completion of government mandated clinical trials or other assessments, specification revisions, and government enforcement action relating to labeling, advertising, marketing and promotion, as well as regulations governing manufacturing controls noted above. If supplies or products are imported or exported, detention or other restrictions may be imposed if there appears to be a violation, potentially disrupting supply chains. New suppliers must be tested and authorized prior to use.
The FDA may withdraw approval of a product if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems occur after a product reaches the market. The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising, and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Pharmaceutical products may be promoted only for the approved indications and consistent with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses.
Our Products and any future products will be subject to continual regulatory review by the FDA and/or (if applicable) non-U.S. regulatory authorities. Conditions may be imposed for continuing approval, potentially including costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate and requirements related to manufacturing and testing. For example, in connection with the DAXXIFY® GL Approval, the FDA required us to transition to a cell-based potency assay as a part of our quality control testing process to align with evolving industry standards. If we are unable to meet our post approval commitments, we may be subject to citations from the FDA, and as a result, negative publicity. In addition, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for our Products and any future products will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP and GCPs for any clinical trials conducted post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with such Products and any future products, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, including conditions of approval, may result in, among other things:
•restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, withdrawal of the product from the market, or voluntary or mandatory product recalls;
•holds or other adverse impacts on ongoing or future clinical trials;
•refusal by the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us or our strategic collaborators, or suspension or revocation of product license approvals;
•product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; and
•injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties;
any of which could be harmful to our ability to generate revenues and our stock price.
In addition, we and Teoxane are subject to ongoing regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the manufacture, marketing, advertising, medical device reporting, sale, promotion, registration, and listing of Class III medical devices. The medical device regulations to which we and Teoxane are subject are complex and have become more stringent over time. Any failure by us or Teoxane to maintain compliance with the applicable regulations and standards for the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers and reports of adverse events or safety concerns could increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue, prevent the import and/or export of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, result in enforcement action by regulatory agencies, cause the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers to be recalled or withdrawn, result in negative publicity and prevent us from successfully commercializing the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers.
Further, as the manufacturer of DAXXIFY® and the distributor of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers, we are required to maintain certain licenses, registrations, permits, authorizations, approvals or other types of state and local permissions in order to comply with various regulations regarding the distribution of drugs and medical devices. Failure to maintain such licenses and approvals will also prevent distribution of Products, which would limit our ability to generate revenue.
Our ongoing regulatory requirements may also change from time to time, potentially harming or making costlier our commercialization efforts. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the U.S. or other countries. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory
compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business.
Our Products and product candidates are subject to ongoing FDA and foreign regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review with respect to manufacturing.
We and any third-party contract development and manufacturers or suppliers are required to comply with applicable cGMP regulations and other international regulatory requirements. The regulations require that our Products and product candidates be manufactured and records maintained in a prescribed manner with respect to manufacturing, testing and quality control/quality assurance activities. The RHA® Collection of dermal fillers are subject to the FDA’s QSR for medical devices. Additionally, third party manufacturers and suppliers and any manufacturing facility typically must undergo a pre-approval inspection before we can obtain marketing authorization for any of our Products or product candidates. Even after a manufacturer has been qualified by the FDA, the manufacturer must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to ensure full compliance with cGMP and QSR, as applicable. Manufacturers are subject to regular, periodic inspections by the FDA following initial approval. Further, to the extent that we contract with third parties for the supply and/or manufacture of our Products (for example, Teoxane with respect to the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers and ABPS and PCI with respect to DAXXIFY®), our ability to control third party compliance with FDA requirements will be limited to contractual remedies and rights of inspection.
If, as a result of the FDA’s inspections, it determines that the equipment, facilities, laboratories or processes do not comply with applicable FDA regulations and conditions of Product approval, the FDA may require remediation, not approve subsequent supplements, may withdraw approval or may suspend the manufacturing operations. If the manufacturing operations of any of the suppliers for our Products or product candidates are suspended, we may be unable to generate sufficient quantities of commercial or clinical supplies of such products to meet market demand or satisfy clinical trial needs, which would harm our business. In addition, if delivery of material from our suppliers were interrupted for any reason, we might be unable to ship our Products for commercial supply or to supply our products in development for clinical trials. Significant and costly delays can occur if the qualification of a new supplier is required.
We are also subject to a variety of federal, state, local, and foreign environmental, health and safety, and other laws and regulations that may affect our research, development and production efforts.
We are subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm, loss of revenue or profits, loss of customers or sales and other adverse business consequences.
We process personal data and other sensitive data; proprietary and confidential business data; trade secrets; intellectual property; and sensitive third-party data. Our data processing activities subject us to numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements, and other obligations that govern the processing of personal data by us and on our behalf.
We are subject to state, federal and foreign laws relating to data privacy and security in the conduct of our business, including state breach notification laws, HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, CCPA, and the TCPA, among others. These laws affect how we collect, use and otherwise process data of our employees, consultants, customers, consumers and other parties. These laws, as well as similar laws being enacted by other states and countries, impose substantial requirements that involve the expenditure of significant resources and the investment of significant time and effort to comply. Our failure to comply with these laws or prevent security breaches of such data could result in significant liability under applicable laws, cause disruption to our business, harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business. We also rely on third parties to host or otherwise process some of this data. In some instances, these third parties have experienced failures to protect data privacy. Any failure by a third party to prevent security breaches could have adverse consequences for us.
We may also be bound by contractual obligations related to data privacy and security, which limit our ability to use and disclose information provided to us, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful. For example, certain privacy laws, such as the CCPA, require our customers to impose specific contractual restrictions on their service
providers. Additionally, some of our customer contracts may require us to host personal data locally. We may publish privacy policies, marketing materials and other statements, such as compliance with certain certifications or self-regulatory principles, regarding data privacy and security. If these policies, materials or statements are found to be deficient, lacking in transparency, deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our practices, we may be subject to investigation, enforcement actions by regulators or other adverse consequences.
Our obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating uncertainty as to the applicable future legal frameworks. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or in conflict among jurisdictions. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources (including, without limitation, financial and time-related resources). These obligations may necessitate changes to our information technologies, systems, and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal data on our behalf. In addition, these obligations may require us to change our business model.
Although we endeavor to comply with all applicable data privacy and security obligations, we may at times fail (or be perceived to have failed) to do so. In addition, despite our efforts, our personnel or third parties upon whom we rely may fail to comply with such obligations.
If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with data privacy and security obligations, we could face significant consequences, including, but not limited to, government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class action-related claims); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal data; and orders to destroy or not use personal data. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations; inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or revision or restructuring of our operations.
If we fail to obtain regulatory approvals in foreign jurisdictions for DAXXIFY®, or any future product candidates, including an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, we will be unable to market our products outside of the U.S.
In addition to regulations in the U.S., we will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing manufacturing, clinical trials, commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product candidate, we must obtain approval of the product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before commencing clinical trials or marketing in those countries. The approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional clinical testing, or the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. Clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries, and approval by one or more foreign regulatory authorities does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals or to do so on a timely basis, and even if we do file, we may not receive the necessary approvals to commercialize our products in geographies outside of the U.S.
Further, interruption or delays in the operations of applicable foreign regulatory agencies may affect the review and approval timelines of such agencies for DAXXIFY®, an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, or the RHA® Pipeline Products or any future product candidates.
Legislative and regulatory healthcare reform may adversely affect our business.
From time to time, legislation is drafted that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the regulatory clearance or approval, manufacture, and marketing of regulated products or the reimbursement thereof. In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “MMA”) changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The legislation established Medicare Part D, which expanded Medicare coverage for outpatient prescription drug purchases by the elderly but provided authority for limiting the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class. The MMA also introduced a new reimbursement methodology based on
average sales prices for physician-administered drugs. Any negotiated prices for our products covered by a Part D prescription drug plan will likely be lower than the prices we might otherwise obtain. Moreover, while the MMA applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates. Any reduction in payment that results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments from non-governmental payors.
In March 2010, the ACA became law in the United States. Among other things, the purpose of the ACA was to reduce the cost of healthcare and substantially change the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. The ACA requires discounts under the Medicare drug benefit program and increased the rebates paid by pharmaceutical companies on drugs covered by Medicaid. The ACA also imposes an annual fee, which increases each year, on sales by branded pharmaceutical manufacturers. The ACA has been challenged repeatedly in court, and its future may be uncertain. If the ACA is ultimately overturned or repealed, the effect on our business could be material.
In August 2022, the current administration signed the IRA into law, which among other things, (1) directs U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare, and (2) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although they may be subject to legal challenges. As of August 29, 2023, CMS announced its selection of the first 10 drugs covered under Medicare Part D set for negotiation. CMS will publish any agreed-upon negotiated prices for the selected drugs by September 1, 2024; those prices will come into effect starting January 1, 2026. In future years, CMS will select for negotiation up to 15 more drugs covered under Part D for 2027, up to 15 more drugs for 2028 (including drugs covered under Part B and Part D), and up to 20 more drugs for each year after that, as outlined in the IRA.
The United States and several other jurisdictions are considering, or have already enacted, a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change their healthcare systems in ways that could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. Among policy makers and payors in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access to healthcare. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of DAXXIFY® and our other future approved products, if any, due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative proposals. Pricing pressures recently experienced by the pharmaceutical industry may be further exacerbated by legislative and policy changes proposed or considered by the executive branch and the United States Congress. We cannot predict the success or impact of any such current or future federal or state legislative efforts.
In addition, regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. Any new regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of any future product candidates. Such changes could, among other things, require changes to manufacturing or marketing methods, changes to product labeling or promotional materials, recall, replacement, or discontinuance of one or more of our products; and additional recordkeeping. Each of these would likely entail substantial time and cost and could materially harm our business and our financial results.
If we market products in a manner that violates healthcare fraud and abuse laws, or if we violate government price reporting or physician payment disclosure laws, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties.
In addition to FDA restrictions on the marketing of pharmaceutical products, several other types of state and federal healthcare laws, commonly referred to as “fraud and abuse” laws, have been applied in recent years to restrict certain marketing practices in the pharmaceutical industry. These laws include false claims and anti-kickback statutes. It is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of these laws.
Federal false claims laws generally prohibit anyone from knowingly and willingly presenting, or causing to be presented, any claims for the payment for goods (including drugs) or services to third-party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid) that are false or fraudulent. The federal civil monetary penalties statute, likewise, imposes penalties against any person or entity that, among other things, is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or
fraudulent. The FCA has been used to prosecute persons submitting claims for payment that are inaccurate or fraudulent, for services not provided as claimed, or for services that are not medically necessary. The FCA includes a whistleblower provision that allows individuals to bring actions on behalf of the federal government and share a portion of the recovery of successful claims.
The federal healthcare program anti-kickback statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to generate business, including the purchase or prescription of a particular product covered by Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers or formulary managers on the other. Although there are several statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchasing or recommending may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exemption or safe harbor. In addition, such exemptions and safe harbors are subject to change from time to time. Additionally, the intent standard under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute does not require that a person or entity have actual knowledge of the statute or a specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. Further, the ACA codified case law that a claim submitted for reimbursement that includes items or services resulting from an arrangement that violates the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA. Many states have similar laws that apply to their state healthcare programs as well as private payors.
HIPAA created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false statement, in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services.
In addition, the federal transparency requirements under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act require certain manufacturers of drugs, including us, for which payment is available under certain federal healthcare programs annually to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, and physician ownership and investment interests. In addition, several states now require prescription drug companies to report expenses relating to the marketing and promotion of drug products.
Further, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or negligent acts committed by our employees, future distributors, partners, collaborators or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could result in fines, penalties or prosecution and have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and reputation.
Finally, we may offer discounted pricing or rebates on DAXXIFY® and our future approved products, if any, under various federal and state healthcare programs, and report specific prices to government agencies under healthcare programs. The calculations necessary to determine the prices reported are complex and the failure to report prices accurately may expose us to significant penalties.
There are state law equivalents of these laws and regulations, such as anti-kickback, false claims and transparency laws, to which we are currently and/or may in the future be subject. We may also be subject to state laws that require manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures. Many of these laws differ from each other in significant ways, thus increasing the cost and complexity of our compliance efforts.
State and federal authorities, in addition to whistleblowers, have aggressively targeted pharmaceutical manufacturers for alleged violations of these anti-fraud statutes for a range of activities, such as those based on improper research or consulting contracts with physicians and other healthcare professionals, certain marketing arrangements that rely on volume-based pricing, off-label marketing schemes, inappropriate billing and other improper promotional practices. A number of pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for a variety of promotional and
marketing activities, including providing free trips, free goods, sham consulting fees and grants and other monetary benefits to prescribers; reporting inflated average wholesale prices that were then used by federal programs to set reimbursement rates; engaging in improper promotional activities; and submitting inflated best price information to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to reduce liability for Medicaid rebates. Companies targeted in such prosecutions have paid substantial fines in the hundreds of millions of dollars or more, have been forced to implement extensive corrective action plans, and have often become subject to consent decrees severely restricting the manner in which they conduct business. Further, defending against any such actions can be costly, time-consuming and may require significant financial and personnel resources.
If we or our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including criminal and significant civil penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion of products from reimbursement under United States federal or state healthcare programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, curtailment or restructuring of our operations could materially and adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. Although compliance programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws, the risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. Moreover, achieving and sustaining compliance with these laws may prove costly.
Our Products and any future approved products may cause or contribute to adverse medical events that we are required to report to regulatory agencies and if we fail to do so, we could be subject to sanctions that would materially harm our business.
As we continue commercialization of the RHA® Collection of dermal fillers and DAXXIFY®, or if we commercialize any future approved products, including an onabotulinumtoxinA biosimilar, the FDA and foreign regulatory agency regulations require that we report certain information about adverse medical events if those products may not have caused or contributed to those adverse events. The timing of our obligation to report would be triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event. We may fail to report adverse events we become aware of within the prescribed timeframe. We may also fail to appreciate that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the use of our products. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, we may be subjected to various sanctions or other actions or outcomes described above. Failure to properly consider adverse event information may also lead us to delay use evaluations and potential labeling updates, which could lead to the initiation of tort litigation for failure to warn.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
Our level of indebtedness and debt service obligations could adversely affect our financial condition, and may make it more difficult for us to fund our operations.
Under the Note Purchase Agreement, drawdowns are available in three tranches, subject to certain terms and conditions, including, with respect to the Third Tranche, the achievement of greater than or equal to $50 million in trailing twelve months revenue for DAXXIFY® preceding the date of the draw request for the Third Tranche and prior approval from Athyrium. To date, we have borrowed the full $100.0 million of the First Tranche and the full $50.0 million of the Second Tranche. However, if we do not achieve the specified conditions and milestones, we will not be eligible to draw funds under the Third Tranche of the Note Purchase Agreement, and we may need to obtain additional or alternative financing to advance our research and development efforts, our regulatory approvals, our commercialization efforts and other aspects of our business plan. Such additional or alternative financing may not be available on attractive terms, if at all, and could be more costly for us to obtain. The Note Purchase Agreement may also limit our ability to raise capital, including our ability to sell or license intellectual property. In addition, before we can draw down the Third Tranche of the Note Purchase Agreement, if available, we must first satisfy ourselves that we will have access to sufficient cash flow from operations and/or future alternate sources of capital, in order to repay any additional principal borrowed, which we may be unable to do, in which case, our liquidity and ability to fund our operations may be substantially impaired.
All obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement are secured by substantially all of our existing property and assets. This indebtedness may create additional financing risk for us, particularly if our business or prevailing financial market conditions are not conducive to paying off or refinancing the outstanding debt obligations at maturity. If we are able
to drawdown any of the Third Tranche, our indebtedness will increase, which would further increase our risk of being unable to pay off or refinance our outstanding debt obligations at maturity. Our indebtedness could also have important negative consequences, including:
•we will need to repay the indebtedness by making payments of interest and principal, which will reduce the amount of cash available to finance our operations, our research and development efforts, our regulatory approvals, our commercialization efforts and other aspects of our business plan;
•our failure to comply with the obligations of our affirmative and restrictive covenants in the Note Purchase Agreement could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, would accelerate our obligation to repay this indebtedness, and Athyrium could seek to enforce its security interest in the assets securing such indebtedness;
•limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry, or our ability to take specified actions to take advantage of certain business opportunities that may be presented to us;
•expose us to the risk of increased interest rates, as our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement are at variable rates of interest;
•place us at a competitive disadvantage; and
•increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions.
To the extent additional debt is added to our current debt levels, the risks described above could increase.
The terms of the Note Purchase Agreement place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility, and if we fail to comply with these restrictions, our business, business prospects, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
The Note Purchase Agreement imposes operating and other restrictions on us. Such restrictions will affect, and in many respects limit or prohibit, our ability and the ability of any future subsidiaries to, among other things:
•dispose of certain assets;
•sell, transfer or exclusively license certain assets, including material intellectual property and capital stock of certain subsidiaries;
•change our line of business;
•engage in mergers, acquisitions or consolidations;
•incur additional indebtedness;
•prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt;
•create liens on assets;
•engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
•pay dividends and make contributions or repurchase our capital stock; and
•make certain loans and investments.
The Note Purchase Agreement also contains financial covenants requiring us to (i) maintain at least $30.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in accounts subject to a control agreement in favor of Athyrium at all times and (ii)
upon the occurrence of certain specified events set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement, achieve at least $70.0 million of Consolidated Teoxane Distribution Net Product Sales on a trailing twelve months basis.
As a result of these restrictions, we may be limited in how we conduct our business; unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate as needed; or unable to compete effectively, take advantage of new business opportunities or grow in accordance with our plans.
The breach of any of these restrictive covenants or any other terms of the Note Purchase Agreement could result in a default under the Note Purchase Agreement, which would allow Athyrium to accelerate our obligation to repay our indebtedness under the Note Purchase Agreement, and result in a cross-acceleration or cross-default with our convertible notes or other indebtedness. In addition, an event of default may prevent us from drawing funds under the Third Tranche of the Note Purchase Agreement and may result in an increased interest rate for all amounts outstanding under the Note Purchase Agreement.
Furthermore, if we are unable to repay the amounts due and payable under the Note Purchase Agreement, Athyrium could also exercise its rights to take possession and dispose of the collateral securing the Note Purchase Agreement, which collateral includes substantially all of our property. The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events could have a material adverse effect on our business, business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not have cash available in an amount sufficient to enable us to make interest or principal payments on our indebtedness when due.
All principal under the Note Purchase Agreement is repayable upon the Maturity Date. And, pursuant to the First Amendment, the Company is required to repay Athyrium the outstanding principal amount of the Second Tranche notes based on a principal amortization schedule. In addition, upon the occurrence of an Amortization Trigger, we are required to repay the principal of the Third Tranche in equal monthly installments beginning on the last day of the month in which the Amortization Trigger occurred and continuing through the Maturity Date. Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance and ability to raise additional sources of cash, which is subject to economic, financial, market, competitive, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash to service our debt, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring our debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive, to the extent permitted by the Note Purchase Agreement. If we desire to refinance our indebtedness, our ability to do so will depend on the capital and lending markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.
Failure to satisfy our current and future obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement could result in an event of default. In addition, the Note Purchase Agreement includes customary affirmative and negative covenants and other events of default, the occurrence and continuance of which provide Athyrium with the right to demand immediate repayment of all principal and unpaid interest under the Note Purchase Agreement, and to exercise remedies against us and the collateral securing the Note Purchase Agreement. These events of default include, among other things:
•insolvency, liquidation, bankruptcy or similar events;
•failure to observe any covenant or secured obligation under the Note Purchase Agreement, subject to a cure period for some covenants and obligations;
•occurrence of an event that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect;
•material misrepresentations;
•occurrence of any default under any other agreement involving indebtedness in excess of specified amounts, or the occurrence of a default under any agreement that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on us;
•certain judgments being entered against us or any portion of our assets are attached or seized; and
•certain governmental and regulatory actions.
In the event of default, Athyrium could accelerate all of the amounts due under the Note Purchase Agreement. Under such circumstances, we may not have enough available cash or be able to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other strategic transactions to repay such indebtedness at the time of such acceleration, which would adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to continue operations. Athyrium could also exercise other rights as discussed above in “—We may not have cash available in an amount sufficient to enable us to make interest or principal payments on our indebtedness when due.” Our business, business prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected as a result of any of these events.
Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness, including the 2027 Notes and Notes Payable, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control, including global macroeconomic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our business may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.
We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the 2027 Notes in cash or to repurchase the 2027 Notes upon a fundamental change, and our future debt may contain limitations on our ability to pay cash upon conversion or repurchase of the 2027 Notes.
Holders of the 2027 Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their 2027 Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture for the 2027 Notes) at a fundamental change repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2027 Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, upon conversion of the 2027 Notes, unless we elect to deliver solely shares of our common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the 2027 Notes being converted. However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of the 2027 Notes surrendered therefor or notes being converted. In addition, our ability to repurchase the 2027 Notes or to pay cash upon conversions of the 2027 Notes may be limited by law, by regulatory authority, by the Note Purchase Agreement or by agreements governing our future indebtedness. Our failure to repurchase the 2027 Notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the Indenture or to pay any cash payable on future conversions of the 2027 Notes as required by the Indenture would constitute a default under the Indenture. A default under the Indenture or the fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under agreements governing our future indebtedness. If the repayment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase the 2027 Notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof.
The conditional conversion feature of the 2027 Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
In the event the conditional conversion feature of the 2027 Notes is triggered, holders of 2027 Notes will be entitled to convert the 2027 Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their 2027 Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their 2027 Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the 2027 Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.
Conversion of the 2027 Notes may dilute the ownership interest of our stockholders or may otherwise depress the price of our common stock.
The conversion of some or all of the 2027 Notes may dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders. Upon conversion of the 2027 Notes, we have the option to pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. If we elect to settle our conversion obligation in shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the 2027 Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the 2027 Notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the 2027 Notes into shares of our common stock could depress the price of our common stock.
General Risk Factors
The trading price of our common stock is volatile, and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
The trading price of our common stock is highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. For example, the closing price of our common stock from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023 has ranged from a low of $5.81 to a high of $37.61. The stock markets in general and the markets for pharmaceutical biopharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular have experienced extreme volatility that may have been for reasons that are related or unrelated to the operating performance of the issuer. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:
•announcements of regulatory approval or disapproval of DAXXIFY® in additional indications, the RHA® Pipeline Products or any future product candidates;
•regulatory or legal actions, developments and guidance in the U.S. and foreign countries, such as the receipt of the CRL related to the BLA for DAXXIFY® GL Approval;
•our success or lack of success in commercializing our Products;
•pricing and reimbursement decisions with respect to our Products;
•results from or delays in clinical trials of our product candidates;
•introductions and announcements of new products by us, any commercialization partners or our competitors, and the timing of these introductions and announcements;
•variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
•changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;
•announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, restructuring activities, licenses, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
•the occurrence of adverse consequences pursuant to our financing arrangements;
•market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors and issuance of securities analysts’ reports or recommendations;
•quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our future competitors;
•changes in financial estimates or guidance, including our ability to meet our future revenue, operating profit or loss and operating expenses estimates or guidance;
•sales of substantial amounts of our stock by insiders and large stockholders, or the expectation that such sales might occur;
•general economic, industry and market conditions;
•adverse tax laws or regulations enacted or existing laws applied to us or our customers;
•additions or departures of key personnel;
•intellectual property, product liability or other litigation against us;
•unanticipated safety concerns related to the use of our Products or any of our future products;
•expiration or termination of our potential relationships with customers and strategic partners;
•the occurrence of trade wars or barriers, or the perception that trade wars or barriers will occur;
•any buying or selling of shares of our common stock or other hedging transactions in our common stock in connection with the 2027 Notes or the capped call transactions;
•widespread public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic; and
•other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section.
These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price or liquidity of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, stockholders have initiated class actions against pharmaceutical companies, including us, following periods of volatility in their stock prices. Such litigation instituted against us could cause us to incur substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Securities and industry analysts may cease to publish research on our company at any time in their discretion. A lack of research coverage may adversely affect the liquidity and market price of our common stock. We will not have any control of the equity research analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our stock could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our stock or issue other unfavorable commentary or research. If one or more equity research analysts ceases coverage of our company, or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public markets, or the perception that such sales might occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. From January 1, 2022 through May 10, 2022, we sold 1.7 million shares of common stock under the 2020 ATM Agreement at a weighted average price of $18.71 per share resulting in net proceeds of $31.6 million after sales agent commissions and offering costs. The 2020 ATM Agreement was terminated on May 10, 2022. On May 10, 2022, we entered into the 2022 ATM Agreement with Cowen. Under the 2022 ATM Agreement, we may sell up to $150.0 million of our common stock. As of both December 31, 2023 and the filing date of this Report, we have sold 3.2 million of shares of common stock under the 2022 ATM Agreement.
On September 15, 2022, we completed an underwritten follow-on offering, pursuant to which we issued 9.2 million shares of common stock at an offering price of $25.00 per share, including the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase 1.2 million additional shares of common stock, for aggregate net proceeds of $215.9 million, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses.
If our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our stockholders intend to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly.
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage takeover attempts and lead to management entrenchment, and the market price of our common stock may be lower as a result.
Certain provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may make it difficult for a third party to acquire, or attempt to acquire, control of the Company, even if a change in control was considered favorable by you and other stockholders. For example, our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board of directors can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of the preferred stock without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The issuance of shares of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control transaction. As a result, the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of our stockholders may be adversely affected. An issuance of shares of preferred stock may result in the loss of voting control to other stockholders.
Our charter documents also contain other provisions that could have an anti-takeover effect, including:
•only one of our three classes of directors will be elected each year;
•no cumulative voting in the election of directors;
•the ability of our board of directors to issues shares of preferred stock and determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval;
•the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy or newly created directorship;
•stockholders will not be permitted to take actions by written consent;
•stockholders cannot call a special meeting of stockholders;
•stockholders must give advance notice to nominate directors or submit proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings;
•the ability of our board of directors, by a majority vote, to amend the bylaws; and
•the requirement for the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3 percent or more of the outstanding common stock to amend many of the provisions described above.
Also, our amended and restated bylaws provide advance notice procedures for stockholders seeking to bring business before our annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at our annual meeting of stockholders. Our amended and restated bylaws also specify certain requirements regarding the form and content of a stockholder's notice. In addition, any stockholder nomination must meet the requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act. These provisions might preclude our stockholders from bringing matters before our annual meeting of stockholders or from making nominations for directors at our annual meeting of stockholders if the proper procedures are not followed. We expect that these provisions might also discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer's own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company.
In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL, which regulates corporate acquisitions. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock, including transactions that may be in your best interests. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management or limit the price that certain investors are willing to pay for our stock.
Our amended and restated bylaws and amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provide that the Delaware Court of Chancery (or, if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, any state court located in
Delaware or if all the state courts lack jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) and any appellate court therefrom will be the exclusive forum for the following types of actions or proceedings under Delaware statutory or common law:
•any derivative action, suit or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company;
•any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, other employee or stockholder of the Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders or any action asserting a claim for aiding and abetting any such breach of fiduciary duty;
•any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against the Company or any current or former director, officer, or other employee of the Company arising out of or pursuant to, or seeking to enforce any right, obligation or remedy under, or to interpret, apply, or determine the validity of, any provision of the DGCL, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or the amended and restated bylaws (as each may be amended from time to time);
•any action, suit, or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Delaware Court of Chancery, and
•any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against the Company or any current or former director, officer, or other employee of the Company governed by the internal-affairs doctrine.
This provision would not apply to actions, suits or proceedings brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws provide that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any claims arising under the Securities Act. The exclusive forum provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. If a court were to find the exclusive-forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business.
Claims for indemnification by our directors and officers may reduce our available funds to satisfy successful third-party claims against us and may reduce the amount of money available to us.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL, our amended and restated bylaws and our indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our directors and officers provide that:
•We will indemnify our directors and officers for serving us in those capacities, or for serving other business enterprises at our request, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that a corporation may indemnify such person if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the registrant and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful.
•We may, in our discretion, indemnify employees and agents in those circumstances where indemnification is permitted by applicable law.
•We are required to advance expenses, as incurred, to our directors and officers in connection with defending a proceeding, except that such directors or officers shall undertake to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification.
•We will not be obligated pursuant to our amended and restated bylaws to indemnify a person with respect to proceedings initiated by that person against us or our other indemnitees, except with respect to proceedings authorized by our board of directors or brought to enforce a right to indemnification.
•The rights conferred in our amended and restated bylaws are not exclusive, and we are authorized to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors, officers, employees and agents and to obtain insurance to indemnify such persons.
•We may not retroactively amend our amended and restated bylaw provisions to reduce our indemnification obligations to directors, officers, employees and agents.
As a result, claims for indemnification by our directors and officers may reduce our available funds to satisfy successful third-party claims against us and may reduce the amount of money available to us.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gains.
We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock to date. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement and any future debt agreements may contain similar restrictions. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased it and it is possible that you may never receive a return on your investment.