UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM  10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 0-54251
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland
 
27-2614444
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
405 Park Avenue, 14 th  Floor
New York, New York
 
10022
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
 
(Zip Code)

(212) 415-6500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes o
No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (check one):
Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer x
 
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  
 Yes o No x
The number of shares of the registrant's common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of November 13, 2013 was 55,318,382.




BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
FORM  10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  as of September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis  of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 




Item 1. Financial Statements.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(in thousands except share and per share data)
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
Investments, at fair value:
 
 
 
 Affiliate Investments, at fair value (amortized cost of $107,725 and $5,000, respectively)
$
111,728

 
$
5,137

 Non-affiliate Investments, at fair value (amortized cost of $318,974 and $129,925, respectively)
324,499

 
131,034

Total Investments, at fair value (amortized cost of $426,699 and $134,925, respectively)
436,227

 
136,171

 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
55,837

 
14,180

Cash collateral on deposit with custodian
58,126

 
19,157

Interest receivable
5,084

 
1,212

Due from affiliate, net
1,119

 
1,601

Deferred credit facility financing costs, net
2,411

 
735

Unrealized gain on total return swap
2,735

 
388

Receivable due on total return swap
3,515

 
1,286

Prepaid expenses and other assets
641

 
234

Receivable for unsettled trades
14,941

 
11,913

Receivable for common stock purchase
7

 

Total assets
$
580,643

 
$
186,877

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES
 

 
 

Revolving credit facility
$
61,687

 
$
33,907

Payable for unsettled trades
43,870

 
9,800

Management fees payable
1,829

 
546

Subordinated income incentive fees payable
442

 

Accrued capital gains incentive fees
2,245

 
358

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
288

 
191

Interest and credit facility fees payable
460

 
192

Payable for common stock repurchases
20

 
175

Stockholder distributions payable
3,275

 
1,023

Total liabilities
$
114,116

 
$
46,192

 
 
 
 
NET ASSETS
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
$

 
$

Common stock, $.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized, 47,532,948 and 14,943,215 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
48

 
15

Capital in excess of par value
454,514

 
138,340

Accumulated under/(over) distributed net investment income
(298
)
 
696

Net unrealized appreciation on investments and total return swap
12,263

 
1,634

Net assets
466,527

 
140,685

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and net assets
$
580,643

 
$
186,877

 
 
 
 
Net asset value per share
$
9.81

 
$
9.41


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

1



BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Investment income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest from investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Affiliate investments
 
$
1,744

 
$

 
$
2,182

 
$

Non-affiliate investments
 
6,111

 
1,959

 
14,944

 
3,677

Total interest from investments
 
7,855

 
1,959

 
17,126

 
3,677

Interest from cash and cash equivalents
 
2

 

 
6

 

Total interest income
 
7,857

 
1,959

 
17,132

 
3,677

Other income
 
538

 
14

 
794

 
63

Total investment income
 
8,395

 
1,973

 
17,926

 
3,740

Operating expenses:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Interest and credit facility financing expenses
 
590

 
192

 
1,359

 
420

Professional fees
 
662

 
137

 
1,474

 
364

Directors fees
 
18

 
18

 
51

 
57

Insurance
 
56

 
51

 
167

 
154

Management fees
 
1,829

 
402

 
3,866

 
730

Subordinated income incentive fees
 
1,768

 
273

 
3,597

 
552

Capital gains incentive fees
 
1,191

 
299

 
2,089

 
416

Other administrative
 
17

 
35

 
89

 
75

Expenses before expense waivers and reimbursements from Adviser
 
6,131

 
1,407

 
12,692

 
2,768

Waiver of management and incentive fees
 
(1,420
)
 
(798
)
 
(1,827
)
 
(1,522
)
Expense support reimbursements from Adviser
 

 

 

 
(266
)
Total expenses net of expense waivers and reimbursements from Adviser
 
4,711

 
609

 
10,865

 
980

Net investment income
 
3,684

 
1,364

 
7,061

 
2,760

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized and unrealized gain on investments and total return swap:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net realized gain from investments
 
429

 
344

 
2,163

 
926

Net realized gain from total return swap
 
4,045

 
390

 
8,715

 
390

Net unrealized appreciation on investments
 
5,524

 
1,184

 
8,282

 
1,154

Net unrealized appreciation on total return swap
 
33

 
580

 
2,347

 
580

Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and total return swap
 
10,031

 
2,498

 
21,507

 
3,050

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
13,715

 
$
3,862

 
$
28,568

 
$
5,810

Per share information - basic and diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
 
$
0.09

 
$
0.16

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.55

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
0.33

 
$
0.47

 
$
0.96

 
$
1.15

Weighted average common shares outstanding
 
41,498,369

 
8,297,178

 
29,615,011

 
5,042,363


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

2


BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)

 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Operations:
 
 
 
Net investment income
$
7,061

 
$
2,760

Net realized gain from investments
2,163

 
926

Net realized gain from total return swap
8,715

 
390

Net unrealized appreciation on investments
8,282

 
1,154

Net unrealized appreciation on total return swap
2,347

 
580

Net increase in net assets from operations
28,568

 
5,810

Stockholder distributions:
 

 
 

Net decrease in net assets from stockholder distributions
(18,932
)
 
(3,351
)
Capital share transactions:
 

 
 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
310,737

 
81,119

Reinvestment of stockholder distributions
6,261

 
981

Repurchases of common stock
(792
)
 
(86
)
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
316,206

 
82,014

 
 
 
 
Total increase in net assets
325,842

 
84,473

Net assets at beginning of period
140,685

 
8,207

Net assets at end of period
$
466,527

 
$
92,680

 
 
 
 
Net asset value per common share
$
9.81

 
$
9.44

Common shares outstanding at end of period
47,532,948

 
9,821,991

 
 
 
 
Accumulated (over) distributed net investment income
$
(298
)
 
$
(334
)



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)



 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Operating activities:
 
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
$
28,568

 
$
5,810

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
 

 
 

Paid-in-kind interest income
(437
)
 
(6
)
Net accretion of discount on investments
(418
)
 
(150
)
Amortization of deferred financing costs
211

 
88

Sales and repayments of investments
189,041

 
62,711

Purchase of investments
(477,799
)
 
(148,252
)
Net realized gain from investments
(2,163
)
 
(926
)
Net unrealized (appreciation) on investments
(8,282
)
 
(1,154
)
Net unrealized (appreciation) on total return swap
(2,347
)
 
(580
)
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
 

 
 

Cash collateral on deposit with custodian
(38,969
)
 
(11,417
)
Interest receivable
(3,872
)
 
(1,032
)
Receivable due on total return swap
(2,229
)
 
(348
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(407
)
 
(113
)
Receivable for unsettled trades
(3,028
)
 
(3,521
)
Receivable for common stock purchase
(7
)
 

Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
 

 
 

Payable for unsettled trades
34,070

 
15,639

Payable for common stock repurchases
(155
)
 

Management and incentive fees payable
3,612

 
176

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
97

 
(16
)
Interest and credit facility fees payable
268

 
72

Net cash used in operating activities
(284,246
)
 
(83,019
)
 
 
 
 
Financing activities:
 

 
 

Proceeds from issuance of shares of common stock, net of issuance costs
310,737

 
81,119

Repurchases of common stock
(792
)
 

(Increase) decrease in deferred offering costs receivable
1,919

 
(444
)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
57,500

 
18,918

Payments on revolving credit facility
(29,720
)
 
(10,000
)
Payments of financing cost
(1,887
)
 
(873
)
Payments to affiliate, net
(1,437
)
 
235

Stockholder distributions
(10,417
)
 
(1,794
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
325,903

 
87,161

 
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
41,657

 
4,142

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
14,180

 
828

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
55,837

 
$
4,970

 
 
 
 

4

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)



 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Supplemental information:
 
 
 
Interest paid during the period
$
871

 
$
215

Taxes, including excise tax, paid during the period
$
2

 
$

Supplemental non-cash information:
 
 
 
DRIP distribution payable
$
1,407

 
$
203

Cash distribution payable
$
1,868

 
$
429

DRIP distribution paid
$
6,261

 
$
717

Stock distribution payable
$

 
$
264


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Portfolio Company (a)
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate/Maturity
 
Principal / Number of Shares
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value ( c )
 
% of Net Assets
Senior Secured First Lien Debt - 43.5% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
American Dental Partners, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.00% (6.00%), 2/9/2018
 
$
3,910

 
$
3,847

 
$
3,831

 
0.8
%
American Importing Company, Inc.
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
 L+5.75% (7.00%), 5/23/2018
 
10,973

 
10,871

 
10,888

 
2.3
%
Avaya, Inc.
 
Telecommunications
 
 L+4.50% (4.79%),10/26/2017
 
3,944

 
3,609

 
3,527

 
0.8
%
BBTS Borrower LP
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
L+6.50% (7.75%), 6/4/2019
 
5,970

 
5,912

 
6,030

 
1.3
%
Clover Technologies Group, LLC
 
Environmental Industries
 
 L+5.50% (6.75%), 5/7/2018
 
4,288

 
4,238

 
4,283

 
0.9
%
Creative Circle, LLC
 
Services: Business
 
L+5.25% (6.50%), 9/28/2017
 
8,427

 
8,284

 
8,511

 
1.8
%
CST Industries, Inc.
 
Construction & Building
 
 L+6.25% (7.75%), 5/23/2017
 
3,750

 
3,714

 
3,722

 
0.8
%
EIG Investors Corp.
 
Services: Business
 
 L+5.00% (6.25%), 11/9/2019
 
3,315

 
3,287

 
3,325

 
0.7
%
EZE Trucking, Inc. (o)
 
Transportation: Cargo
 
 L+9.75% (10.00%), 7/31/2018
 
12,455

 
12,395

 
12,393

 
2.7
%
Expera Specialty Solutions, LLC
 
Forest Products & Paper
 
L+6.25% (7.50%), 7/28/2018
 
7,980

 
7,824

 
8,020

 
1.7
%
FairPay Solutions Inc. Term Loan A
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.75% (7.00%), 1/16/2015
 
2,350

 
2,334

 
2,350

 
0.5
%
FairPay Solutions Inc. Term Loan B
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+6.50% (8.00%), 1/16/2015
 
7,500

 
7,450

 
7,500

 
1.6
%
Global Telecom & Technology, Inc.
 
Telecommunications
 
L+5.50% (6.50%), 3/31/2016
 
7,800

 
7,722

 
7,715

 
1.7
%
Ikaria Acquisitions, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+6.00% (7.25%), 7/31/2018
 
5,925

 
5,839

 
5,925

 
1.3
%
Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
L+8.50% (10.00%), 10/16/2017
 
13,328

 
13,250

 
13,128

 
2.8
%
K2 Pure Solutions Nocal, L.P.
 
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
 
L+6.00% (7.00%), 8/19/2019
 
10,000

 
9,804

 
9,804

 
2.1
%
Miller Heiman
 
Services: Business
 
L+5.75% (6.75%), 9/30/2018
 
15,250

 
14,793

 
14,793

 
3.2
%
Mitel Networks Corp.
 
Telecommunications
 
L+5.75% (7.00%), 2/27/2019
 
3,980

 
3,943

 
4,000

 
0.9
%
NextCare - Acquisition (n)
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.50% (6.75%), 10/10/2017
 
976

 
961

 
961

 
0.2
%
NextCare
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.50% (6.75%), 10/10/2017
 
9,244

 
9,110

 
9,105

 
1.9
%
NXT Capital
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
L+5.25% (6.25%), 9/4/2018
 
10,000

 
9,901

 
9,900

 
2.1
%
PPT Management, LLC
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+7.00% (8.50%), 10/31/2016
 
2,047

 
2,039

 
2,039

 
0.4
%
Premier Dental Services Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+7.00% (8.25%), 11/1/2018
 
3,970

 
3,867

 
3,980

 
0.9
%
Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.
 
Services: Consumer
 
L+5.00% (6.25%), 7/1/2019
 
7,705

 
7,632

 
7,653

 
1.6
%
RedPrairie Corp
 
High Tech Industries
 
L+5.50% (6.75%), 12/21/2018
 
1,985

 
1,949

 
1,996

 
0.4
%
Riverboat Corp. of Mississippi
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+8.75% (10.00%), 11/29/2016
 
10,000

 
9,835

 
10,000

 
2.1
%

6

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Portfolio Company (a)
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate/Maturity
 
Principal / Number of Shares
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value ( c )
 
% of Net Assets
Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
L+5.25%, (6.75%), 4/30/2017
 
2,820

 
2,786

 
2,767

 
0.6
%
The Tennis Channel Holdings, Inc.(d)
 
Media: Broadcasting & Subscription
 
L+8.50%, (8.81%), 5/23/2017
 
15,055

 
14,636

 
14,641

 
3.1
%
Trinity Consultants Holdings, Inc.
 
Environmental Industries
 
L+5.00%, (6.25%), 4/15/2018
 
3,101

 
3,080

 
3,099

 
0.7
%
United Central Industrial Supply Company, LLC
 
Metals & Mining
 
L+6.25%, (7.50%), 10/12/2018
 
3,960

 
3,821

 
3,524

 
0.8
%
WBL SPE I, LLC (m)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
15.00%, 9/30/2016
 
3,750

 
3,713

 
3,600

 
0.8
%
Sub Total Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
202,446

 
$
203,010

 
43.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt 11.8% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CREDITCORP
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
12.00%, 7/15/2018
 
$
8,500

 
$
8,424

 
$
8,457

 
1.8
%
Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
12.50%, 8/16/2018
 
5,000

 
5,000

 
4,981

 
1.1
%
H.D. Vest, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
9.25%, 6/18/2019
 
8,750

 
8,646

 
8,641

 
1.8
%
Linc Energy Finance USA, Inc.
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
12.50%, 10/31/2017
 
9,000

 
8,858

 
9,826

 
2.1
%
MBLOX Inc.
 
Telecommunications
 
10.75%, 9/1/2016
 
7,000

 
6,969

 
6,986

 
1.5
%
NCP Finance Limited Partnership
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
L+9.75% (11.00%), 9/25/2015
 
8,000

 
7,840

 
7,920

 
1.7
%
Teleflex Marine, Inc. (d)
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
13.50%, 8/24/2017
 
3,332

 
$
3,269

 
$
3,320

 
0.7
%
Telligent Systems, Inc. (l)
 
Services: Business
 
10.75%, 7/10/2016
 
5,000

 
$
4,977

 
$
5,017

 
1.1
%
Sub Total Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
53,983

 
$
55,148

 
11.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subordinated Debt - 8.7% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold, Inc. (d)
 
Consumer Goods: Non-durable
 
15.00%, 12/31/2017
 
$
12,061

 
$
11,837

 
$
11,916

 
2.6
%
S.B. Restaurant Co., Inc. (d)
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
14.00%, 1/10/2018
 
4,040

 
3,964

 
3,885

 
0.8
%
Telligent Systems, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
12.00%, 7/10/2016
 
2,000

 
2,000

 
2,000

 
0.4
%
The SAVO Group, Ltd.
 
High Tech Industries
 
10.95%, 3/28/2017
 
5,000

 
4,976

 
4,997

 
1.1
%
Varel International Energy Mezzanine Funding Corp. (d)
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
14.00%, 1/15/2018
 
10,289

 
10,201

 
10,240

 
2.2
%
Vestcom Acquisition, Inc.
 
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
 
12.00%, 6/26/2019
 
7,500

 
7,432

 
7,477

 
1.6
%
Sub Total Subordinated Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
40,410

 
$
40,515

 
8.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collateralized Securities 16.0 % (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ALM VI, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
6/14/2023
 
$
2,000

 
$
1,794

 
$
1,941

 
0.4
%

7

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Portfolio Company (a)
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate/Maturity
 
Principal / Number of Shares
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value ( c )
 
% of Net Assets
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-1, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
4/20/2022
 
2,000

 
1,667

 
1,659

 
0.4
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-2, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
7/20/2023
 
1,000

 
788

 
965

 
0.2
%
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
1/27/2025
 
25,000

 
23,000

 
26,208

 
5.6
%
Garrison Funding 2013 - 1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes ( e ) (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
9/30/2023
 
15,000

 
15,000

 
15,000

 
3.2
%
JMP Credit Advisors CLO II Ltd. Subordinated Notes (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
4/30/2023
 
6,000

 
5,700

 
6,228

 
1.3
%
MC Funding Ltd. Preferred Shares
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
12/20/2020
 
4,000

 
3,534

 
2,709

 
0.6
%
Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, LTD. Subordinated Notes ( e ) (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
7/12/2014
 
20,000

 
20,000

 
20,000

 
4.3
%
Sub Total Collateralized Securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
71,483

 
$
74,710

 
16.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Other -13.4 % (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. ( e ) (j)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
$
2,097

 
$
2,097

 
$
2,020

 
0.4
%
MBLOX Inc. - Warrants ( e )
 
Telecommunications
 
 
 
1,531

 

 
531

 
0.1
%
NewStar Arlington Fund, LLC (i) (k)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
25,648

 
25,648

 
25,648

 
5.5
%
PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP (g) (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
10,000

 
10,000

 
10,287

 
2.2
%
Precision Dermatology, Inc. - Warrants ( e )
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
 
 
218

 

 

 
%
S.B. Restaurant Co., Inc. - Warrants ( e )
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
 
 

 

 
40

 
%
Telligent Systems, Inc. - Warrants (Second Lien Debt) ( e )
 
Services: Business
 
 
 
535

 

 
378

 
0.1
%
Telligent Systems, Inc. - Warrants (Third Lien Bridge Note) ( e )
 
Services: Business
 
 
 
1,000

 

 
1,544

 
0.3
%
Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P.( e ) (f)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
8,504

 
8,504

 
8,944

 
1.9
%
The SAVO Group, Ltd. - Warrants ( e )
 
High Tech Industries
 
 
 
104

 

 
1,345

 
0.3
%
THL Credit Greenway Fund II LLC (h) (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
8,378

 
8,378

 
8,357

 
1.8
%
World Business Lenders, LLC ( e )
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
3,750

 
3,750

 
3,750

 
0.8
%
Sub Total Equity/Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
58,377

 
$
62,844

 
13.4
%
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 93.4% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
426,699

 
$
436,227

 
93.4
%

8

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)



(a)
All of the Company's investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), except ALM VI, Ltd. Subordinated Notes, Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-1, Ltd. Subordinated Notes, Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-2, Ltd. Subordinated Notes, Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc., Catamaran CLO 2013-1Ltd. Subordinated Notes, Garrison Funding 2013 - 1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes, JMP Credit Advisors CLO II Ltd. Subordinated Notes, MC Funding Ltd. Preferred Shares, Mitel Networks Corp., NewStar Arlington Fund, LLC, PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP, Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, LTD. Subordinated Notes, Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P. and THL Credit Greenway Fund II LLC.
(b)
Percentages are based on net assets of $ 466,527 thousand as of September 30, 2013 .
(c)
Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is determined in good faith by the Company's board of directors as required by the 1940 Act. (See Note 3 to the financial statements).
(d)
Terms of loan include PIK interest.
(e)
Non-income producing at September 30, 2013.
(f)
The Company has committed to fund $10.0 million in Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P. over a period ending no later than September 2015. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $1.5 million.
(g)
The investment is subject to a three year lock-up restriction on withdrawals with a 3% fee charged on withdrawals in year 4.
(h)
The Company has committed to fund $20.0 million in THL Credit Greenway Fund II LLC over a period ending no later than March 2015. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $11.6 million.
(i)
The Company's investments are classified in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliated Investments” are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-affiliated Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments.
(j)
The Company has committed to fund $10.0 million in Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $7.9 million.
(k)
The Company has committed to fund $30.0 million in NewStar Arlington Fund, LLC. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $4.4 million.
(l)
The Company has committed to fund a delayed draw term loan of $1.0 million in Telligent Systems, Inc. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $1.0 million.
(m)
The Company has committed to fund a delayed draw term loan of $11.3 million in WBL SPE I, LLC. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $11.3 million.
(n)
The Company has committed to fund a delayed draw term loan of $5.7 million in NextCare. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $4.7 million.
(o)
The Company has committed to fund a delayed draw term loan of $2.0 million in EZE Trucking, Inc. The remaining commitment as of September 30, 2013 was $2.0 million.


The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping based on fair value at September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 
At September 30, 2013
 
Investments at
Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
$
163,593

 
37.5
%
Services: Business
60,103

 
13.8
%
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
35,691

 
8.2
%
Energy: Oil & Gas
31,077

 
7.1
%
Telecommunications
22,759

 
5.2
%
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
14,812

 
3.4
%
Media: Broadcasting & Subscription
14,641

 
3.4
%
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
13,320

 
3.1
%
Transportation: Cargo
12,393

 
2.8
%
Consumer Goods: Non-durable
11,916

 
2.7
%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
9,804

 
2.2
%
High Tech Industries
8,338

 
1.9
%
Forest Products & Paper
8,020

 
1.8
%
Services: Consumer
7,654

 
1.8
%
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
7,478

 
1.7
%
Environmental Industries
7,382

 
1.7
%
Construction & Building
3,722

 
0.9
%
Metals & Mining
3,524

 
0.8
%
Total
$
436,227

 
100.0
%


9

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)


December 31, 2012
Portfolio Company (a)
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate/Maturity
 
Principal / Number of Shares
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value ( c )
 
% of Net Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt - 59.9% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Airvana Network Solutions, Inc.
 
High Tech Industries
 
L+8.00% (10.00%), 3/15/2017
 
$
745

 
$
715

 
$
746

 
0.6
%
American Dental Partners, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.75% (7.25%), 2/9/2018
 
3,955

 
3,883

 
3,718

 
2.7
%
Avaya, Inc.
 
Telecommunications
 
 L+4.50% (4.94%),10/26/2017
 
3,979

 
3,588

 
3,502

 
2.5
%
Clover Technologies Group, LLC
 
Environmental Industries
 
 L+5.50% (6.75%), 5/7/2018
 
3,949

 
3,891

 
3,915

 
2.8
%
ConvergeOne Holdings Corp.
 
Telecommunications
 
L+7.00% (8.50%), 6/8/2017
 
3,900

 
3,842

 
3,876

 
2.8
%
Corner Investment Propco, LLC
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
 L+9.75% (11.00%), 11/2/2019
 
4,000

 
3,921

 
3,935

 
2.8
%
Creative Circle, LLC
 
Services: Business
 
 L+6.00% (7.25%), 9/28/2017
 
9,938

 
9,742

 
9,788

 
7.0
%
CST Industries, Inc.
 
Construction & Building
 
L+5.25% (8.50%), 5/23/2017
 
3,900

 
3,855

 
3,866

 
2.7
%
EIG Investors Corp.
 
Services: Business
 
 L+5.00% (6.25%), 11/9/2019
 
3,000

 
2,970

 
2,998

 
2.1
%
eResearch Technology, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
 L+6.50% (8.00%), 7/11/2018
 
499

 
480

 
493

 
0.4
%
Hudson Products Holdings, Inc.
 
Capital Equipment
 
L+5.75% (7.00%), 6/7/2017
 
4,000

 
3,960

 
4,005

 
2.8
%
Ikaria Acquisition, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+6.50% (7.75%), 9/15/2017
 
3,990

 
3,971

 
4,005

 
2.8
%
Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
L+8.50% (10.00%), 10/16/2017
 
5,000

 
4,806

 
4,825

 
3.4
%
K2 Pure Solutions Nocal, L.P.
 
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
 
L+7.75% (10.00%), 9/10/2015
 
3,434

 
3,445

 
3,400

 
2.4
%
Permian Tank & Manufacturing, Inc.
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
L+7.25% (9.00%), 3/16/2017
 
1,550

 
1,515

 
1,578

 
1.1
%
PPT Management, LLC
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+7.00% (8.50%), 10/31/2016
 
1,989

 
1,978

 
1,989

 
1.4
%
Precision Dermatology, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+9.00% (13.00%), 4/25/2017
 
5,000

 
4,978

 
4,995

 
3.6
%
Premier Dental Services, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+7.00% (8.25%), 11/1/2018
 
4,000

 
3,882

 
3,890

 
2.8
%
RedPrairie Corp.
 
High Tech Industries
 
L+5.00% (6.75%), 12/12/2018
 
2,000

 
1,960

 
2,002

 
1.4
%
Riverboat Corp. of Mississippi
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+8.75% (10.00%), 11/29/2016
 
10,000

 
9,802

 
9,900

 
7.0
%
Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
L+5.25% (6.75%), 4/30/2017
 
2,963

 
2,920

 
2,962

 
2.1
%
United Central Industrial Supply Company, LLC
 
Metals & Mining
 
L+6.25% (7.50%), 9/28/2018
 
4,000

 
3,844

 
3,840

 
2.7
%
Sub Total Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
83,948

 
$
84,228

 
59.9
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

10

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2012
Portfolio Company (a)
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate/Maturity
 
Principal / Number of Shares
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value ( c )
 
% of Net Assets
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt - 23.7% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EIG Investors Corp.
 
Services: Business
 
L+9.00% (10.25%), 5/9/2020
 
$
4,000

 
$
3,960

 
$
3,980

 
2.8
%
Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
12.50%, 8/16/2018
 
5,000

 
5,000

 
5,000

 
3.6
%
Plato Learning, Inc.
 
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
 
L+9.75% (11.25%), 5/10/2019
 
2,000

 
1,963

 
1,960

 
1.4
%
Linc Energy Finance USA, Inc.
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
12.50%, 10/31/2017
 
11,000

 
10,769

 
11,014

 
7.8
%
RedPrairie Corp.
 
High Tech Industries
 
L+10.00% (11.25%), 12/12/2019
 
8,000

 
7,840

 
8,147

 
5.8
%
Teleflex Marine, Inc. (d)
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
13.50%, 8/24/2017
 
3,332

 
3,259

 
3,258

 
2.3
%
Sub Total Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
32,791

 
$
33,359

 
23.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subordinated Debt - 2.8% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S.B Restaurant Co., Inc. (d)
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
14.00%, 1/10/2018
 
$
4,009

 
$
3,924

 
$
3,939

 
2.8
%
Sub Total Subordinated Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,924

 
$
3,939

 
2.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collateralized Securities - 6.1% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ALM VI, Ltd. Subordinated Notes (e)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
6/14/2023
 
$
2,000

 
$
1,980

 
$
2,030

 
1.4
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-1, Ltd. Subordinated Notes (e)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
4/20/2022
 
2,000

 
1,840

 
1,950

 
1.4
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-2, Ltd. Subordinated Notes (e) (f)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
7/20/2023
 
1,000

 
850

 
953

 
0.7
%
MC Funding Ltd. Preferred Shares (e)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
12/20/2020
 
4,000

 
3,840

 
3,600

 
2.6
%
Sub Total Collateralized Securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
8,510

 
$
8,533

 
6.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Other - 4.3% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PennantPark Credit Opportunities Fund, L.P. (f) (h) (i)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
$
5,000

 
$
5,000

 
$
5,137

 
3.6
%
Precision Dermatology, Inc., Warrants, Strike: $1.148 (f)
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
 
 
218

 

 

 
%
S.B Restaurant Co., Inc. - Warrants, Strike: $0.0001 (f)
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
 
 

 

 
223

 
0.2
%
Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P. (f) (g)
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
 
 
768

 
752

 
752

 
0.5
%
Sub Total Equity/Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,752

 
$
6,112

 
4.3
%
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 96.8% (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
134,925

 
$
136,171

 
96.8
%


11

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

(a)
All of the Company's investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, except ALM VI, Ltd. Subordinated Notes, Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-1, Ltd. Subordinated Notes, Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-2, Ltd. Subordinated Notes, MC Funding Ltd. Preferred Shares, PennantPark Credit Opportunities Fund L.P. and Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P.
(b)
Percentages are based on net assets of $ 140,685 thousand as of December 31, 2012 .
(c)
Because there is no readily available market value for these investments, the fair value of these investments is determined in good faith by the Company's board of directors as required by the Investment Company Act of 1940. (See Note 3 to the financial statements).
(d)
Terms of loan include PIK interest.
(e)
Investment coupon rate for the collateralized securities is based on interest income received for the year ended December 31, 2012.
(f)
Non-income producing at December 31, 2012.
(g)
The Company has committed to fund $10.0 million in Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P. over a period ending no later than September 2015. The remaining commitment as of December 31, 2012 was $9.2 million.
(h)
The investment is subject to a three year lock-up restriction on withdrawals with a 3% fee charged on withdrawals in year 4.
(i)
The Company's investments are classified in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliated Investments” are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-affiliated Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments.

    
The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping based on fair value at December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

 
At December 31, 2012
 
Investments at
Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
Services: Business
$
24,553

 
18.0
%
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
19,090

 
14.0

Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
17,093

 
12.6

Energy: Oil & Gas
17,592

 
12.9

Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
14,422

 
10.6

Beverage, Food & Tobacco
4,162

 
3.1

High Tech Industries
10,895

 
8.0

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
3,400

 
2.6

Environmental Industries
3,915

 
2.9

Metals & Mining
3,840

 
2.8

Capital Equipment
4,005

 
2.9

Telecommunications
7,378

 
5.4

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
1,960

 
1.4

Construction & Building
3,866

 
2.8

Total
$
136,171

 
100.0
%


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


12

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)


Note 1 — Organization and Business Purpose

Business Development Corporation of America (the “Company”), incorporated in Maryland on May 5, 2010, is an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and that has elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Company is, therefore, required to comply with certain regulatory requirements as promulgated under the 1940 Act. The Company is managed by BDCA Adviser, LLC (the “Adviser”) pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory and Management Services Agreement, as amended (the “Advisory Agreement”). The Adviser was formed in Delaware as a private investment management firm and is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The Adviser oversees the management of the Company's activities and is responsible for making investment decisions for its portfolio.

On January 25, 2011, the Company commenced its initial public offering (the “IPO”) on a “reasonable best efforts basis” of up to 150.0 million shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at an initial offering price of $10.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts, pursuant to a registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-166636) (the “Registration Statement”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  The Company sold 22,222 shares of common stock to its Adviser, an entity wholly owned by AR Capital, LLC (the “Sponsor”) on July 8, 2010 at $9.00 per share, which represents the initial public offering price of $10.00 per share minus selling commissions of $0.70 per share and dealer manager fees of $0.30 per share.  On August 25, 2011, the Company had raised sufficient funds to break escrow on its IPO and commenced operations as of that date. As of September 30, 2013 , the Company had issued 47.5 million shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $504.4 million including the shares purchased by the Sponsor and shares issued under the Company's distribution reinvestment plan ("DRIP"). As of September 30, 2013, the Company had repurchased 0.1 million shares of common stock for payments of $ 1.1 million.
    
On July 13, 2012, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, 405 TRS I, LLC (“405 Sub”), entered into a total return swap agreement (“TRS”) with Citibank, N.A. (“Citi”), which was subsequently amended on October 17, 2012, December 7, 2012, May 10, 2013 and July 18, 2013, increasing the maximum possible exposure under the TRS to $275.0 million.

On July 24, 2012, the Company, through a newly-formed, wholly-owned special purpose financing subsidiary, BDCA Funding I, LLC (“Funding I”), entered into a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as lender, Wells Fargo Securities, as administrative agent (together, “Wells Fargo”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent, account bank and collateral custodian. The Credit Facility, which was subsequently amended on September 9, 2013, provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million on a committed basis, with a term of 60 months.

The Company's investment objective is to generate both current income and to a lesser extent long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. The Company anticipates that during its offering period it will invest largely in first and second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt issued by middle market companies. The Company may also purchase interests in loans through secondary market transactions in the "over-the-counter" market for institutional loans. First and second lien secured loans generally are senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt and equity in bankruptcy priority and are generally secured by liens on the operating assets of a borrower which may include inventory, receivables, plant, property and equipment. Mezzanine debt is subordinated to senior loans and is generally unsecured. The Company defines middle market companies as those with annual revenues between $10 million and $1 billion. The Company may also invest in the equity and junior debt tranches of collateralized loan obligation investment vehicles (“Collateralized Securities”). Structurally, Collateralized Securities are entities that are formed to manage a portfolio of senior secured loans made to companies whose debt is rated below investment grade or, in limited circumstances, unrated. The senior secured loans within these Collateralized Securities are limited to senior secured loans which meet specified credit and diversity criteria and are subject to concentration limitations in order to create a diverse investment portfolio. The Company expects that each investment will range between approximately $1 million and $25 million, although this investment size will vary proportionately with the size of its capital base. As the Company increases its capital base during the offering period, it intends to have a substantial portion of its assets invested in customized direct loans to and equity securities of middle market companies. In most cases, companies to whom the Company provides customized financing solutions will be privately held at the time the Company invests in them.

13

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)


The Company has entered into a fund administration servicing agreement and a fund accounting servicing agreement with US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (the “Administrator”). The Administrator provides services, such as accounting, financial reporting, legal and compliance support and investor relations support, necessary for the Company to operate. On August 13, 2012, the Company entered into a custody agreement with U.S. Bank National Association (“US Bank”). Under the custody agreement, US Bank holds all of the portfolio securities and cash of the Company for certain of its subsidiaries, and transfers such securities or cash pursuant to the Company’s instructions. The custody agreement is terminable by either party, without penalty, on not less than ninety days prior notice to the other party.

Realty Capital Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an entity under common ownership with the Sponsor, serves as the dealer manager of the Company’s IPO. The Adviser and the Dealer Manager are related parties and receive compensation and fees for services related to the IPO and for the investment and management of the Company’s assets. The Adviser receives fees during the offering, operational and liquidation stages, and the Dealer Manager receives fees during the offering stage.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP").

The Company consolidates its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Funding I and 405 Sub. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company's interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Articles 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the Company's interim financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

Portfolio investments are reported on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities at fair value. On a quarterly basis the Company performs an analysis of each investment to determine fair value as follows:

Securities for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. The Company may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of the Company's investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value assets. When doing so, the Company determines whether the quote obtained is sufficient according to U.S. GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. If determined adequate, the Company uses the quote obtained.


14

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Investments without a readily determined market value are primarily valued using a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these approaches, the types of factors that the Company may take into account in fair value pricing the Company's investments include, as relevant: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A comparables, and enterprise values, among other factors. When available, broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services are considered as an input in the valuation process.
    
For an investment in an investment fund that does not have a readily determinable fair value, the Company measures the fair value of the investment predominately based on the net asset value per share of the investment fund if the net asset value of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Financial Accounting Standards Board, ("FASB"), Accounting Standards Codification, ("ASC"), Topic 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies, as of the Company's measurement date. However, in determining the fair value of the Company's investment, the Company may make adjustments to the net asset value per share in certain circumstances, based on the Company's analysis of any restrictions on redemption of the shares of the investment as of the measurement date. The value of our TRS is primarily based on the increase or decrease in the value of the loans underlying the TRS, as determined by Citi based upon indicative pricing by an independent third-party pricing service.

For investments in Collateralized Securities, the Company models both the assets and liabilities of each Collateralized Securities' capital structure.  The model uses a waterfall engine to store the collateral data, generate collateral cash flows from the assets, and distribute the cash flows to the liability structure based on the priority of payments. The waterfall cash flows are discounted using rates that incorporate risk factors such as default risk, interest rate risk, downgrade risk, and credit spread risk, among others. In addition, the Company considers broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services as an input to determining fair value when available. 

As part of the Company's quarterly valuation process, the Adviser may be assisted by an independent valuation firm engaged by the Company's board of directors. The audit committee of the Company's board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and the Adviser and an independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee. The board of directors then discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of the Adviser, the independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of the board of directors.

Because there is not a readily available market value for most of the investments in its portfolio, the Company values substantially all of its portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by its board of directors, as described herein. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company's investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of the Company's investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that the Company may ultimately realize. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If the Company was required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, the Company could realize significantly less than the value at which the Company has recorded it.
    

15

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Investment Classification

The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, "control" is defined as the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company, unless such power is solely the result of an official position with such company. In addition, any person "who owns beneficially, either directly or through one or more controlled companies, more than 25 per centum of the voting securities of a company shall be presumed to control such company. Any person who does not so own more than 25 per centum of the voting securities of any company shall be presumed not to control such company". Using this definition, the Company has determined to treat “Control Investments” as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities, maintains greater than 50% of the board representation or has the power to exercise control over the management or policies of such portfolio company. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliated Investments” are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-affiliated Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliated Investments.

Where appropriate, prior period financial statements have been reclassified to disclose the Company's Control Investments and Affiliate Investments as defined by the 1940 Act.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term, liquid investments such as money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value. Per section 12(d)(1)(a) of the 1940 Act, the Company may not invest in another registered investment company, including a money market fund, if any of the following occur:

the Company owns more than 3% of the money market fund;

the Company holds securities in the money market fund having an aggregate value in excess of 5% of the value of the total assets of the Company; or

the Company holds securities in money market funds and other registered investment companies having an aggregate value in excess of 10% of the value of the total assets of the Company.

Offering Costs

The Company has incurred certain costs in connection with the registration of shares of its common stock. These costs principally relate to professional fees, printing fees, fees paid to the SEC and fees paid to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Offering costs are recorded as a reduction to contributed capital.

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company and the Adviser have agreed that the Company will not be liable for offering costs to the extent that, together with all prior offering costs, the amounts exceed 1.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the Company’s on-going offering.

Deferred Credit Facility Financing Costs

Financing costs incurred in connection with the Company’s revolving Credit Facility are capitalized and amortized into expense using the straight-line method over the life of the respective facility. See Note 5 - Borrowings - for details on the Credit Facility.


16

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Distributions

The Company has declared and paid cash distributions to stockholders on a monthly basis since it commenced operations. The amount of each such distribution is subject to the discretion of the board of directors and applicable legal restrictions related to the payment of distributions. The Company will calculate each stockholder’s specific distribution amount for the month using record and declaration dates and accrue distributions on the date the Company accepts a subscription for shares of the Company’s common stock. From time to time, the Company may also pay interim distributions, including capital gains distributions, at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors. The Company’s distributions may exceed earnings, especially during the period before it has substantially invested the proceeds from the offering. As a result, a portion of the distributions made by the Company may represent a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A return of capital is a return of each stockholder’s investment rather than earnings or gains derived from the Company’s investment activities.

The Company may fund cash distributions to stockholders from any sources of funds available to the Company, including expense payments from the Adviser that are subject to reimbursement, as well as offering proceeds and borrowings. The Company has not established limits on the amount of funds it may use from available sources to make distributions.

Distribution Reinvestment Program

The Company has adopted an “opt in” DRIP pursuant to which investors may elect to have the full amount of their cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock. Participants in the Company’s DRIP are free to elect or revoke reinstatement in the DRIP within a reasonable time as specified in the plan. If an investor does not elect to participate in the plan, the investor will automatically receive any distributions the Company declares in cash. The Company expects to coordinate distribution payment dates so that the same price that is used for the closing date immediately following such distribution payment date will be used to calculate the purchase price for purchasers under the DRIP. The investors’ reinvested distributions will purchase shares at a price equal to 90% of the price that shares are sold in the offering at the closing immediately following the distribution payment date.

Revenue Recognition

Interest Income

Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the expected life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortizations of premium on investments.

The Company has a number of investments in Collateralized Securities. Interest income from investments in the "equity" class of these Collateralized Securities (in the Company's case, preferred shares or subordinated notes) is recorded based upon an estimation of an effective yield to expected maturity utilizing assumed cash flows in accordance with ASC Topic 325-40-35, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The Company monitors the expected cash inflows from its equity investments in Collateralized Securities, including the expected principal repayments. The effective yield is determined and updated quarterly.
Payment-in-Kind Interest

The Company holds debt investments in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity, is generally recorded on the accrual basis.


17

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Non-accrual income

Investments are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest/dividend payments are past due 30 days or more and/or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued cash and un-capitalized PIK interest is generally reversed when an investment is placed on non-accrual status. Previously capitalized PIK interest is not reversed when an investment is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual investments may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management's judgment of the ultimate outcome. Non-accrual investments are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in management's judgment, are likely to remain current.

Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation

Gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific identification method. The Company measures realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, but considering unamortized upfront fees and prepayment penalties. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation will reflect the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Generally, a RIC is exempt from federal income taxes if it distributes to stockholders at least 90% of ‘‘Investment Company Taxable Income,’’ as defined in the Code, each year. Distributions paid up to one year after the current tax year can be carried back to the prior tax year for determining the distributions paid in such tax year. The Company intends to make sufficient distributions to maintain its RIC status each year. The Company is also subject to nondeductible federal excise taxes if it does not distribute at least 98% of net ordinary income each calendar year, 98.2% of capital gain net income for the one year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year, if any, and any recognized and undistributed income from prior years for which it paid no federal income taxes. The Company will generally endeavor each year to avoid any federal excise taxes.

Share Repurchase Program

The Company’s board of directors has adopted a Share Repurchase Program (“SRP”) that enables the Company’s stockholders to sell their shares to the Company in limited circumstances.  On September 12, 2012, the Company commenced its first quarterly tender offer pursuant to the SRP. The Company intends to conduct tender offers on a quarterly basis on such terms as may be determined by its board of directors in its complete and absolute discretion unless, in the judgment of the independent directors of its board of directors, such repurchases would not be in the Company’s best interests or would violate applicable law.

The Company currently intends to limit the number of shares to be repurchased during any calendar year to the number of shares it can repurchase with the proceeds it receives from the sale of shares under its DRIP. At the discretion of the Company’s board of directors, the Company may also use cash on hand, cash available from borrowings and cash from liquidation of investments as of the end of the applicable period to repurchase shares. In addition, as of the date of this filing, the Company will limit the number of shares to be repurchased in any calendar year to 10% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding in the prior calendar year, or 2.5% in each quarter, though the actual number of shares that the Company offers to repurchase may be less in light of the limitations noted above. The Company will offer to repurchase such shares on each date of repurchase at a price equal to 92.5% of the public offering price in effect on each date of repurchase, which will be determined in the same manner that the Company determined the public offering price per share for purposes of its continuous public offering. The Company’s board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the repurchase program at any time upon 30 days’ notice.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had repurchased 0.1 million shares of common stock for payments of $ 1.1 million. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had not repurchased any shares.


18

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-08, Financial Services – Investment Companies (ASC Topic 946), which affects the scope, measurement and disclosure requirements for investment companies under GAAP. The amendments (i) change the approach to the investment company assessment in ASC Topic 946, clarify the characteristics of an investment company, and provide comprehensive guidance for assessing whether an entity is an investment company; (ii) require an investment company to measure non-controlling ownership interests in other investment companies at fair value rather than the equity method of accounting; and (iii) require the following additional disclosures (a) the fact that the entity is an investment company and is applying the guidance in ASC Topic 946, (b) information about changes, if any, in an entity’s status as an investment company, and (c) information about financial support provided or contractually required to be provided by an investment company to any of its investees. This guidance is effective for interim an annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013.

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance that expands the existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements, primarily for Level 3 measurements, which are measurements based on unobservable inputs such as the Company's own data. This guidance is largely consistent with current fair value measurement principles with few exceptions that do not result in a change in general practice. The guidance became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 and, accordingly, the Company has presented the required disclosures (see Note 3 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments). The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations as the guidance relates only to disclosure requirements.

  Note 3 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting guidance establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. This alternative approach also reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, if any, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the above hierarchy requires significant judgment and factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter.


19

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

All of the Company’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2013 was comprised of debt and equity instruments for which Level 1 inputs, such as quoted prices, are not available. Therefore, at September 30, 2013 , the investments were valued at fair value as determined in good faith using the valuation policy approved by the board of directors using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. The Company evaluates the source of inputs, including any markets in which the Company's investments are trading, in determining fair value. Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, the estimate of fair value of the Company’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2013 may differ materially from values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed.

In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Company continues to employ the valuation policy approved by the board of directors. Portfolio investments are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. On a quarterly basis the Company performs an analysis of each investment to determine fair value as follows:

Securities for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. The Company may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of the Company's investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value assets. When doing so, the Company determines whether the quote obtained is sufficient according to U.S. GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. If determined adequate, the Company uses the quote obtained.

Investments without a readily determined market value are primarily valued using a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these approaches, the types of factors that the Company may take into account in fair value pricing the Company's investments include, as relevant: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A comparables, and enterprise values, among other factors. When available, broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services are considered as an input in the valuation process.

For an investment in an investment fund that does not have a readily determinable fair value, the Company measures the fair value of the investment predominately based on the net asset value per share of the investment fund if the net asset value of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of ASC Topic 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies, as of the Company's measurement date. However, in determining the fair value of the Company's investment, the Company may make adjustments to the net asset value per share in certain circumstances, based on the Company's analysis of any restrictions on redemption of the shares of the investment as of the measurement date. The value of our TRS is primarily based on the increase or decrease in the value of the loans underlying the TRS, as determined by Citi based upon indicative pricing by an independent third-party pricing service.
    
For investments in Collateralized Securities, the Company models both the assets and liabilities of each Collateralized Securities' capital structure.  The model uses a waterfall engine to store the collateral data, generate collateral cash flows from the assets, and distribute the cash flows to the liability structure based on priority of payments. The waterfall cash flows are discounted using rates that incorporate risk factors such as default risk, interest rate risk, downgrade risk, and credit spread risk, among others. In addition, the Company considers broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services as an input to determining fair value when available. 

As part of the Company's quarterly valuation process, the Adviser may be assisted by an independent valuation firm engaged by the Company's board of directors. The audit committee of the board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and the Adviser and an independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee. The board of directors then discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of the Adviser, the independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of the board of directors.


20

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. Accordingly, the notes to the consolidated financial statements refer to the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any change in such valuations on the consolidated financial statements.
    
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of September 30, 2013 , according to the fair value hierarchy (dollars in thousands) :
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
$

 
$
116,148

 
$
86,862

 
$
203,010

Senior Secured Second Lien Debt

 
34,844

 
20,304

 
55,148

Subordinated Debt

 

 
40,515

 
40,515

Collateralized Securities

 

 
74,710

 
74,710

Equity/Other

 

 
62,844

 
62,844

Total Return Swap

 
2,735

 

 
2,735

Total
$

 
$
153,727

 
$
285,235

 
$
438,962

    
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of December 31, 2012, according to the fair value hierarchy (dollars in thousands):
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
$

 
$
59,038

 
$
25,190

 
$
84,228

Senior Secured Second Lien Debt

 
25,101

 
8,258

 
33,359

Subordinated Debt

 

 
3,939

 
3,939

Collateralized Securities

 

 
8,533

 
8,533

Equity/Other

 

 
6,112

 
6,112

Total Return Swap

 
388

 

 
388

Total
$

 
$
84,527

 
$
52,032

 
$
136,559


The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
Subordinated Debt
 
Collateralized Securities
 
Equity/Other
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2012
$
25,190

 
$
8,258

 
$
3,939

 
$
8,533

 
$
6,112

 
$
52,032

Net unrealized gains (losses)
(207
)
 
91

 
90

 
3,204

 
4,107

 
7,285

Purchases and other adjustments to cost
92,450

 
11,955

 
36,486

 
63,700

 
54,149

 
258,740

Sales and repayments
(21,186
)
 

 

 
(727
)
 
(1,524
)
 
(23,437
)
Net realized gain
403

 

 

 

 

 
403

Net transfers in and/or out
(9,788
)
 

 

 

 

 
(9,788
)
Balance as of September 30, 2013
$
86,862

 
$
20,304

 
$
40,515

 
$
74,710

 
$
62,844

 
$
285,235

Unrealized gains (losses) for the
     period relating to those Level 3
     assets that were still held by
     the Company at the end of the
     period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          Net change in unrealized
             gain (loss):
$
(92
)
 
$
91

 
$
90

 
$
3,204

 
$
4,107

 
$
7,400



21

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Purchases represent the acquisition of new investments at cost. Redemptions represent principal payments received during the period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there were no transfers out of Level 1 to Level 2 or out of Level 2 to Level 3.

As of September 30, 2013, an investment in 1 portfolio company was transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 as the number and/or reliability of market quotes became available for this investment and has been subsequently used for valuation purposes.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which transfers occur.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the year ended December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
Senior Unsecured Debt
 
Subordinated Debt
 
Collateralized Securities
 
Equity/Other
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2011
$
9,611

 
$
2,996

 
$
887

 
$
230

 
$

 
$

 
$
13,724

Net unrealized gains
215

 

 

 
15

 
22

 
360

 
612

Purchases and other adjustments to cost
27,642

 
9,247

 

 
3,924

 
9,306

 
5,752

 
55,871

Sales and repayments
(7,598
)
 
(1,466
)
 

 
(230
)
 
(827
)
 

 
(10,121
)
Net realized gain
35

 
18

 

 

 
32

 

 
85

Net transfers in and/or out
(4,715
)
 
(2,537
)
 
(887
)
 

 

 

 
(8,139
)
Balance as of December 31, 2012
$
25,190

 
$
8,258

 
$

 
$
3,939

 
$
8,533

 
$
6,112

 
$
52,032

Unrealized gains (losses) for the
     year relating to those Level 3
     assets that were still held by
     the Company at the end of the
     period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          Net change in unrealized
             gain:
$
215

 
$

 
$

 
$
15

 
$
22

 
$
360

 
$
612

    
For the year ended December 31, 2012, there were no transfers between Level 1 to Level 2 or out of Level 2 to Level 3.
Investments in 19 portfolio companies were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 in 2012 as the number and/or reliability of market quotes became available for these investments and have been subsequently used for valuation purposes.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which transfers occur.

The composition of the Company’s investments as of September 30, 2013 , at amortized cost and fair value, were as follows (dollars in thousands):


22

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

 
Investments at
Amortized Cost
 
Investments at
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
$
202,446

 
$
203,010

 
46.6
%
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
53,983

 
55,148

 
12.6
%
Subordinated Debt
40,410

 
40,515

 
9.3
%
Collateralized Securities
71,483

 
74,710

 
17.1
%
Equity/Other
58,377

 
62,844

 
14.4
%
Total
$
426,699

 
$
436,227

 
100.0
%

The composition of the Company’s investments as of December 31, 2012, at amortized cost and fair value, were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
Investments at
Amortized Cost
 
Investments at
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
$
83,948

 
$
84,228

 
61.9
%
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
32,791

 
33,359

 
24.5
%
Subordinated Debt
3,924

 
3,939

 
2.9
%
Collateralized Securities
8,510

 
8,533

 
6.3
%
Equity/Other
5,752

 
6,112

 
4.4
%
Total
$
134,925

 
$
136,171

 
100.0
%

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used to value the majority of the Level 3 investments as of September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands). The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead identifies the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the determination of fair values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Range
 
 
Asset Category
 
Fair Value
 
Primary Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Minimum
 
Maximum
 
Weighted Average
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
$
86,862

 
Yield Analysis
 
Market Yield
 
6.25
%
 
9.75
%
 
7.93
%
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
20,304

 
Yield Analysis
 
Market Yield
 
11.75
%
 
13.50
%
 
12.64
%
Subordinated Debt
 
40,515

 
Yield Analysis
 
Market Yield
 
12.00
%
 
17.00
%
 
14.08
%
Collateralized Securities
 
74,710

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Discount Rate
 
10.00
%
 
17.78
%
 
13.96
%
Equity/Other
 
7,588

 
Market Multiple Analysis
 
EBITDA Multiple
 
1.4x

 
4.3x

 
2.5x

Equity/Other
 
25,648

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Market Yield
 
12.33
%
 
12.33
%
 
12.33
%
 
 
$
255,627

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The remaining $29.6 million of our Level 3 investments consisted of equity investments in funds which were valued based on the net asset values published by the fund.

Significant increases or decreases in any of the above unobservable inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement for such assets.


23

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used to value the majority of the Level 3 investments as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands). The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead identifies the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the determination of fair values.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Range
 
 
Asset Category
 
Fair Value
 
Primary Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Minimum
 
Maximum
 
Weighted Average
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
$
25,190

 
Yield Analysis
 
Market Yield
 
6.75
%
 
14.50
%
 
10.15
%
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
8,258

 
Yield Analysis
 
Market Yield
 
13.25
%
 
14.25
%
 
13.64
%
Subordinated Debt
 
3,939

 
Yield Analysis
 
Market Yield
 
15.50
%
 
15.50
%
 
15.50
%
Equity/Other
 
223

 
Market Multiple Analysis
 
EBITDA Multiple
 
4.5x

 
4.9x

 
4.5x

 
 
$
37,610

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The remaining $14.4 million of our Level 3 investments consisted of $5.9 million of equity investments in funds which were valued based on the net asset values published by the fund and $8.5 million of collateralized securities. Since the Company used third party dealer marks to estimate the fair value of its collateralized securities owned at December 31, 2012, the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets as of December 31, 2012 have not been provided.

Significant increases or decreases in any of the above unobservable inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement for such assets.
    
Note 4 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements

The Sponsor, including its wholly owned subsidiary, the Adviser, owns 0.16 million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of September 30, 2013 .

Management and Incentive Fee Compensation to the Adviser
 
The Adviser and its affiliates receive fees for services relating to the investment and management of the Company’s assets. The Adviser is entitled to an annual base management fee calculated at an annual rate of 1.5% of the Company’s average gross assets. The management fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and is calculated based on the average value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters.
 
The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which is referred to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on 20% of “pre-incentive fee net investment income” but only after the payment of a certain preferred return rate to investors, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, for the immediately preceding quarter of 1.75%  per quarter, or an annualized rate of 7.0% , subject to a "catch-up" feature. The second part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, is an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the Company’s portfolio and is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Advisory Agreement). This fee equals 20.0% of the Company’s incentive fee capital gains, which equals the Company’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , the Company incurred $1.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, of management fees and waived none of such fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 , the Company incurred $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively of management fees, of which the Adviser waived $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
    

24

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , the Company incurred $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively of subordinated incentive fees on income of which the Adviser waived $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 , the Company incurred $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of subordinated incentive fees on income, all of which were waived by the Adviser.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company incurred $1.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of capital gains incentive fees under the Advisory Agreement, of which the Adviser waived $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company incurred $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively of capital gains incentive fees under the Advisory Agreement, all of which were waived by the Adviser.

For accounting purposes only, the Company is required under U.S. GAAP to also accrue a theoretical capital gains incentive fee based upon unrealized capital appreciation on investments held at the end of each period. The accrual of this theoretical capital gains incentive fee assumes all unrealized capital appreciation and depreciation is realized in order to reflect a capital gains incentive fee that would theoretically be payable to the Adviser as if the investments were liquidated on such date. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , the Company incurred $1.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of theoretical capital gains incentive fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company did not incur any theoretical capital gains incentive fees. The amounts actually paid to the Adviser will be consistent with the Advisers Act and formula reflected in the Advisory Agreement which specifically excludes consideration of unrealized capital appreciation.

Expense Support Agreement

The Adviser and its affiliates may incur and pay costs and fees on behalf of the Company. The Company and its Adviser have entered into the Expense Support Agreement, whereby the Adviser may pay the Company up to 100% of all operating expenses (“Expense Support Payment”) for any period beginning on the effective date of the Registration Statement, until the Adviser and the Company mutually agree otherwise. The Expense Support Payment for any month shall be paid by the Adviser to the Company in cash and/or offsets against amounts due from the Company to the Adviser.

Operating expenses subject to this agreement include expenses as defined by U.S. GAAP, including, without limitation, advisory fees payable and interest on indebtedness for such period, if any.

Pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement, the Company will reimburse the Adviser for Expense Support Payments within three years of the date that the expense support payment obligation was incurred by the Adviser, subject to the conditions described below. The amount of any reimbursement during any calendar quarter will be limited to an amount that does not cause the Company's other operating expenses to exceed 1.5% of its net assets attributable to common shares after taking such reimbursement payment into account.

In addition, the Company will only make reimbursement payments if its “operating expense ratio” (as described in footnote 1 to the table below) is equal to or less than its operating expense ratio at the time the corresponding expense payment was incurred and if the annualized rate of the Company's regular cash distributions to stockholders is equal to or greater than the annualized rate of its regular cash distributions to stockholders at the time the corresponding expense payment was incurred.


25

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Below is a table that provides information regarding expense support payment obligations incurred by the Adviser pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement as well as other information relating to the Company's ability to reimburse the Adviser for such payments. The amounts presented in the first column below are subject to reimbursement to the Adviser pursuant to the terms of the Expense Support Agreement (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended
 
Amount of Expense Payment Obligation
 
Operating Expense Ratio as of the Date Expense Payment Obligation Incurred (1)
 
Annualized Distribution Rate as of the Date Expense Payment Obligation Incurred (2)
 
Eligible for Reimbursement Through
March 31, 2011
 
$

 
%
 
%
 
N/A
June 30, 2011
 

 

 

 
N/A
September 30, 2011
 
571

 
2.88

 
8.11

 
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2011
 
131

 
1.97

 
7.90

 
December 31, 2014
March 31, 2012
 
78

 
0.90

 
7.88

 
March 31, 2015
June 30, 2012
 
189

 
0.30

 
7.75

 
June 30, 2015
______________    

(1)
"Operating Expense Ratio" is expressed as a percentage of net assets and includes all expenses borne by us, except for organizational and offering expenses, base management and incentive fees owed to our Adviser and interest expense.
(2)
"Annualized Distribution Rate" equals the annualized rate of distributions paid to stockholders based on the amount of the regular cash distribution paid immediately prior to the date the expense support payment obligation was incurred by our Adviser. "Annualized Distribution Rate" does not include special cash or stock distributions paid to stockholders.
(3)
"N/A"- Not Applicable

If an Expense Support Payment has not been reimbursed within three years of the date such Expense Support Payment was incurred, the Company’s obligation to pay such Expense Support Payment shall automatically terminate and be of no further effect.
 
The Company has recorded $1.1 million and $1.6 million as due from affiliate on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , respectively, which reflects the netting of amounts due from the Adviser and affiliates and amounts due from the Company. On August 24, 2012, the Adviser made a payment to the Company in the amount of $0.8 million for $1.0 million of operating expenses pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement netted against $0.2 million due from the Company to the Adviser as reimbursement for payments made by the Adviser on behalf of the Company. As of September 30, 2013, the Adviser had assumed on a cumulative basis, $1.0 million of operating expenses pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement.
    
Offering Costs

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company and the Adviser have agreed that the Company will not be liable for offering expenses to the extent that, together with all prior offering expenses, the amounts exceed 1.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the Company’s on-going offering. As of September 30, 2013 , offering costs in the amount of $1.1 million have been incurred in excess of the 1.5% limit and are the responsibility of the Adviser; however, the Company may, but is not obligated to, pay certain amounts back to the Adviser over time. As of December 31, 2012, offering costs in the amount of $1.6 million had been incurred in excess of the 1.5% limit and are the responsibility of the Adviser.


26

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Other Affiliates

The Company's transfer agent, American National Stock Transfer, LLC, is an entity under common ownership with the Sponsor. The business was formed on November 2, 2012 and began providing certain transfer agency services for the Company on March 15, 2013.

The Dealer Manager, an entity under common ownership with the Sponsor, serves as the dealer manager of the Company's IPO. The Dealer Manager receives fees for services related to the IPO during the offering stage. The investment banking and capital markets division of the Dealer Manager provides strategic advisory services and earns fees for these services.

The following table reflects the fees incurred and unpaid to our Dealer Manager, the Adviser and transfer agent as of and for the period presented (dollars in thousands):

 
 
Incurred
 
Unpaid
 
 
Year to Date September 30, 2013
 
As of September 30, 2013
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees
 
$
30,095

 
$

Offering costs
 
1,992

 
141

Management and incentive fees
 
7,725

 
4,516

Investment banking advisory fees
 
594

 

Total related party fees
 
$
40,406

 
$
4,657


Note 5 — Borrowings

In January 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to obtain a revolving line of credit in the amount of  $10.0 million with Main Street Capital Corporation ("Main Street"). The line was available to the Company until January 2013 and permitted the Company to periodically draw on the available funds to purchase securities or pay certain expenses. The line of credit had a variable interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 3.50% . On July 24, 2012, the Company used working capital and certain proceeds from the total return swap of its subsidiary, 405 Sub, to repay all of the obligations under the Company's credit facility with Main Street. The Company was not required to pay any prepayment penalty in connection with such repayment. The Company expensed all remaining deferred financing costs associated with the Company's credit facility with Main Street. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , the Company incurred no interest expense on the credit facility with Main Street since all of the obligations were repaid on July 24, 2012. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 , the Company incurred interest expense related to the outstanding borrowings on the credit facility with Main Street in the amount of $0.02 million and $0.02 million, respectively.

On July 24, 2012, the Company, through a newly-formed, wholly-owned special purpose financing subsidiary, Funding I, entered into the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent, account bank and collateral custodian. The Credit Facility, which was subsequently amended on September 9, 2013, provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million on a committed basis, with a term of 60 months.

The Company may contribute cash or loans to Funding I from time to time to retain a residual interest in any assets contributed through its ownership of Funding I or will receive fair market value for any loans sold to Funding I. Funding I may purchase additional loans from various sources. Funding I has appointed the Company as servicer to manage its portfolio of loans. Funding I's obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Funding I, including its portfolio of loans. The obligations of Funding I under the Credit Facility are non-recourse to the Company.


27

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

The Credit Facility will be priced at the one month maturity LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor, plus a spread ranging between 1.75% and 2.50% per annum, depending on the composition of the portfolio of loans owned by Funding I for the relevant period. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears. Funding I will be subject to a non-usage fee to the extent the aggregate principal amount available under the Credit Facility has not been borrowed. The non-usage fee per annum for the first six months is 0.50%; thereafter, the non-usage fee per annum is 0.50% for the first 20% of the unused balance and 2.0% for the portion of the unused balance that exceeds 20%. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , the Company incurred $0.2 million, and $0.5 million, respectively, of non-usage fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company incurred $0.04 million and $0.04 million of non-usage fees, respectively. Any amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable in April 2018.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility are subject to compliance with a borrowing base, pursuant to which the amount of funds advanced to Funding I varies depending upon the types of loans in Funding I's portfolio. As of September 30, 2013 , the Company was in compliance with regards to the Credit Facility covenants. The Credit Facility may be prepaid in whole or in part, subject to customary breakage costs. In the event that the Credit Facility is terminated prior to the first anniversary, an additional amount is payable to Wells Fargo equal to 2.00% of the maximum amount of the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility contains customary default provisions for facilities of this type pursuant to which Wells Fargo may terminate the rights, obligations, power and authority of the Company, in its capacity as servicer of the portfolio assets under the Credit Facility, including, but not limited to, non-performance of Credit Facility obligations, insolvency, defaults of certain financial covenants and other events with respect to the Company that may be adverse to Wells Fargo and the secured parties under the Credit Facility.

In connection with the Credit Facility, Funding I has made certain representations and warranties, is required to comply with various covenants, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities and is subject to certain customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, Wells Fargo may declare the outstanding advances and all other obligations under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable. During the continuation of an event of default, Funding I must pay interest at a default rate.

Borrowings of Funding I will be considered borrowings of the Company for purposes of complying with the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act, applicable to business development companies.
    
As of September 30, 2013 , the Company had gross deferred credit facility financing costs of $2.4 million, net of accumulated amortization of $0.3 million in connection with the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had deferred credit facility financing costs of $0.8 million, net of accumulated amortization of $0.09 million in connection with the Credit Facility. At September 30, 2013 , $ 61.7 million was drawn on the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2012, $33.9 million was drawn on the Credit Facility. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , the Company incurred interest expense related to the outstanding borrowings on the Credit Facility in the amount of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company incurred interest expense related to the outstanding borrowings on the Credit Facility in the amount of $0.05 million and $0.05 million.

The weighted average annualized interest cost for all borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 was 2.43% and 2.99%, respectively. The average debt outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 was $34.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively. The maximum debt outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $61.7 million and $14.8 million, respectively.

28

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)


The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The fair value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, due to affiliates and accounts payable approximate their carrying value on the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities due to their short-term nature. The fair value of the Company’s remaining financial instruments that are not reported at fair value on the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities are reported below (dollars in thousands):
 
Level
 
Carrying Amount at September 30, 2013
 
Fair Value at September 30, 2013
Revolving Credit Facility
3

 
$
61,687

 
$
61,687

 
Level
 
Carrying Amount at December 31, 2012
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2012
Revolving Credit Facility
3

 
$
33,907

 
$
33,907


Note 6 — Total Return Swap

On July 13, 2012, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, 405 Sub, entered into a TRS with Citi, which was amended on October 17, 2012, December 7, 2012, May 10, 2013 and July 18, 2013 to increase the aggregate market value of the portfolio of loans selected by 405 Sub.
 
A total return swap is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets underlying the TRS, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate. The TRS effectively adds leverage to the Company's portfolio by providing investment exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or investing directly in such market. The TRS enables the Company, through its ownership of 405 Sub, to obtain the economic benefit of owning the loans subject to the TRS, without actually owning them, in return for an interest-type payment to Citi.

The obligations of 405 Sub under the TRS are non-recourse to the Company and the Company's exposure to the TRS is limited to the amount that it contributes to 405 Sub in connection with the TRS. Generally, that amount will be the amount that 405 Sub is required to post as cash collateral for each loan (which in most instances is approximately 25% of the market value of a loan at the time that such loan is purchased). The cash collateral on deposit as of September 30, 2013 was $58.1 million. The cash collateral on deposit as of December 31, 2012 was $19.2 million. As amended, the TRS provides that 405 Sub may select a portfolio of loans with a maximum aggregate market value (determined at the time such loans become subject to the TRS) of $275.0 million.

405 Sub pays interest to Citi for each loan at a rate equal to one-month or three-month LIBOR, depending on the terms of the loan, plus 1.20% per annum. Upon the termination or repayment of any loan selected by 405 Sub under the Agreement, 405 Sub may deduct the appreciation of such loan's value from any interest owed to Citi or pay the depreciation amount to Citi in addition to remaining interest payments.

Citi may terminate any individual loan on or after July 13, 2015. However, if at any time, any particular loan fails to meet certain criteria set forth in the TRS, and such failure continues for 30 days, Citi will have the right to terminate that loan or the entire agreement with at least 10 days' notice and 405 Sub would be required to pay certain breakage costs to Citi. 405 Sub may terminate the TRS prior to July 13, 2015 but would be required to pay certain termination fees.
        

29

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

At September 30, 2013, the receivable and realized gain on the total return swap on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
Net Receivable
 
Net Realized Gains
Interest and other income from TRS portfolio
$
4,074

 
$
9,695

TRS interest expense
(702
)
 
(1,660
)
Gains on TRS asset sales
143

 
680

Net receivable/realized gain from TRS
$
3,515

 
$
8,715

    
At September 30, 2012, the receivable and realized gain on the total return swap on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
Net Receivable
 
Net Realized Gains
Interest and other income from TRS portfolio
$
379

 
$
427

TRS interest expense
(74
)
 
(81
)
Gains on TRS asset sales
43

 
44

Net receivable/realized gain from TRS
$
348

 
$
390

    
The Company values its TRS in accordance with the agreements between 405 Sub and Citi, which collectively establish the TRS and are collectively referred to herein as the TRS Agreement. Pursuant to the TRS Agreement, the value of the TRS is based on the increase or decrease in the value of the loans underlying the TRS, together with accrued interest income, interest expense and certain other expenses incurred under the TRS. The loans underlying the TRS are valued by Citi. Citi bases its valuation primarily on the indicative bid prices provided by an independent third-party pricing service. Bid prices reflect the highest price that market participants may be willing to pay. These valuations are sent to the Company for review and testing. The Company's management reviews and approves the value of the TRS, as well as the value of the loans underlying the TRS, on a quarterly basis as part of their quarterly valuation process. To the extent the Company's management has any questions or concerns regarding the valuation of the loans underlying the TRS, such valuations are discussed or challenged pursuant to the terms of the TRS.

The fair value of the TRS is reflected as an unrealized gain or loss on the total return swap on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. The change in value of the TRS is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the total return swap.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of the TRS was $2.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2013, 405 Sub had exposure to 30 underlying loans with a total notional amount of $230.8 million and posted $58.1 million in cash collateral held by Citibank, which is reflected in cash collateral on deposit with custodian on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2012, 405 Sub had exposure to 17 underlying loans with a total notional amount of $71.7 million and posted $19.2 million in cash collateral held by Citibank, which is reflected in cash collateral on deposit with custodian on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.

For purposes of the asset coverage ratio test applicable to the Company as a BDC, the Company has agreed with the staff of the SEC to treat the outstanding notional amount of the TRS, less the initial amount of any cash collateral posted by 405 Sub under the TRS, as a senior security for the life of that instrument. The Company may, however, accord different treatment to the TRS in the future in accordance with any applicable new rules or interpretations adopted by the staff of the SEC.

Further, for purposes of Section 55(a) under the 1940 Act, the Company has agreed with the staff of the SEC to treat each loan underlying the TRS as a qualifying asset if the obligor on such loan is an eligible portfolio company and as a non-qualifying asset if the obligor is not an eligible portfolio company. The Company may, however, accord different treatment to the TRS in the future in accordance with any applicable new rules or interpretations adopted by the staff of the SEC.


30

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of the underlying loans subject to the TRS as of September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

Underlying Loan
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate, Maturity Date
 
Principal
 
Notional Amount
 
Market Value
 
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AM General LLC
 
Aerospace and Defense
 
L+9.00%, 3/22/2018
 
$
6,825

 
$
6,620

 
$
6,253

 
$
(367
)
American Dental Partners, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.00%, 2/9/2018
 
3,401

 
3,197

 
3,333

 
136

BBTS Borrower LP
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
L+6.50%, 6/4/2019
 
18,905

 
18,781

 
19,094

 
313

CBAC Borrower, LLC
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+7.00%, 4/26/2020
 
3,000

 
2,970

 
3,083

 
113

Clover Technologies Group, LLC (aka 4L Holdings)
 
Environmental Industries
 
L+5.50%, 5/7/2018
 
7,188

 
7,141

 
7,180

 
39

Corner Investment Propco, LLC
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+9.75%, 11/2/2019
 
9,000

 
8,932

 
9,135

 
203

Expera Specialty Solutions, LLC
 
Forest Products & Paper
 
L+6.25%, 12/21/2018
 
6,983

 
6,843

 
7,017

 
174

Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
L+5.25%, 5/2/2018
 
5,458

 
5,432

 
5,458

 
26

Ikaria Acquisition, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+6.00%, 7/3/2018
 
13,825

 
13,618

 
13,825

 
207

Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
L+8.50%, 10/16/2017
 
9,266

 
9,008

 
9,127

 
119

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+5.00%, 10/29/2018
 
3,960

 
3,901

 
3,965

 
64

Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.
 
Automobile
 
L+5.75%, 8/8/2019
 
10,000

 
9,850

 
10,038

 
188

Liquidnet Holdings, Inc
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
L+8.00%, 5/3/2017
 
8,288

 
8,205

 
8,163

 
(42
)
Miller Heiman
 
Services: Business
 
L+5.75%, 9/30/2018
 
13,750

 
13,338

 
13,338

 

Mitel Networks Corp.
 
Telecommunications
 
L+5.75%, 2/27/2019
 
5,970

 
5,910

 
6,000

 
90

NXT Capital LLC
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
L+5.25%, 9/4/2018
 
10,000

 
9,900

 
9,900

 

Orchard Acquisition Company, LLC
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
L+7.50%, 2/4/2019
 
10,952

 
10,609

 
10,993

 
384

Plato Learning, Inc.
 
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
 
L+4.75%, 5/17/2018
 
2,406

 
2,398

 
2,414

 
16

Premier Dental Services, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+7.00%, 11/1/2018
 
4,963

 
4,814

 
4,975

 
161

Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.
 
Services: Consumer
 
L+5.00%, 7/1/2019
 
13,370

 
13,240

 
13,281

 
41

St. George's University Scholastic Services, LLC
 
Services: Consumer
 
L+7.00%, 12/20/2017
 
6,877

 
6,739

 
6,903

 
164

STG-Fairway Acquisitions, Inc.
 
Capital Equipment
 
L+5.00%, 2/28/2019
 
6,965

 
6,895

 
6,943

 
48

United Central Industrial Supply Company, LLC
 
Metals & Mining
 
L+6.25%, 10/12/2018
 
4,950

 
4,752

 
4,406

 
(346
)
US Shipping LLC
 
Transportation: Cargo
 
L+7.75%, 4/11/2018
 
11,970

 
11,888

 
12,209

 
321

Varel International Ind., LP
 
Energy: Oil & Gas
 
L+7.75%, 7/17/2017
 
4,888

 
4,790

 
4,985

 
195

Vestcom Acquisition, Inc.
 
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
 
L+5.75%, 12/26/2018
 
7,463

 
7,350

 
7,425

 
75

Sub Total Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
207,121

 
$
209,443

 
$
2,322

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

31

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Underlying Loan
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate, Maturity Date
 
Principal
 
Notional Amount
 
Market Value
 
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EIG Investors Corp.
 
Services: Business
 
L+9.00%, 5/8/2020
 
4,000

 
4,005

 
4,010

 
5

NCP Finance Limited Partnership
 
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
 
L+9.75%, 9/25/2018
 
10,000

 
9,800

 
9,900

 
100

Plato Learning, Inc.
 
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
 
L+9.75%, 5/17/2019
 
2,000

 
1,992

 
2,000

 
8

RedPrairie Corp.
 
High Tech Industries
 
L+10.00%, 12/14/2019
 
8,000

 
7,840

 
8,140

 
300

Sub Total Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23,637

 
24,050

 
413

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
230,758

 
$
233,493

 
$
2,735


The following is a summary of the underlying loans subject to the TRS as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Underlying Loan
 
Industry
 
Investment Coupon Rate, Maturity Date
 
Principal
 
Notional Amount
 
Market Value
 
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
American Dental Partners, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+5.75%, 2/9/2018
 
$
3,440

 
$
3,234

 
$
3,234

 
$

Clover Technologies Group, LLC
 
Environmental Industries
 
L+5.50%, 5/7/2018
 
4,936

 
4,899

 
4,893

 
(6
)
Corner Investment Propco, LLC
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+9.75%, 11/1/2019
 
5,000

 
4,900

 
4,919

 
19

DS Waters of America, Inc.
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
L+9.00%, 8/22/2017
 
2,487

 
2,509

 
2,550

 
41

eResearch Technology, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+6.50%, 7/11/2018
 
2,494

 
2,394

 
2,462

 
68

Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC
 
Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
L+5.25%, 5/30/2017
 
5,492

 
5,467

 
5,458

 
(9
)
Hudson Products Holdings, Inc.
 
Capital Equipment
 
L+5.75%, 6/7/2017
 
3,500

 
3,465

 
3,504

 
39

Ikaria Acquisition, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+6.50%, 9/15/2017
 
4,489

 
4,466

 
4,505

 
39

Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
 
Services: Business
 
L+8.50%, 9/27/2017
 
5,000

 
4,800

 
4,825

 
25

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+5.00%, 10/30/2018
 
3,990

 
3,930

 
3,950

 
20

K2 Pure Solutions Nocal, L.P.
 
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
 
L+7.75%, 9/10/2015
 
2,499

 
2,487

 
2,474

 
(13
)
Northfield Park Associates, LLC
 
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
 
L+7.75%, 11/1/2018
 
5,000

 
4,900

 
5,000

 
100

Pinnacle Operating Corp.
 
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
 
L+5.50%, 11/15/2018
 
3,990

 
3,870

 
3,900

 
30

Plato Learning, Inc.
 
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
 
L+6.00%, 5/10/2018
 
1,950

 
1,943

 
1,931

 
(12
)
Premier Dental Services, Inc.
 
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
 
L+7.00%, 11/1/2018
 
5,000

 
4,850

 
4,863

 
13

St. George's University Scholastic Services, LLC
 
Services: Business
 
L+7.00%, 12/15/2017
 
9,000

 
8,820

 
8,854

 
34

United Central Industrial Supply Company, LLC
 
Metals & Mining
 
L+6.25%, 10/12/2018
 
5,000

 
4,800

 
4,800

 

Sub Total Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
 
 
 
 

 
$
71,734

 
$
72,122

 
$
388

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
71,734

 
$
72,122

 
$
388




32

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into future funding commitments. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had unfunded commitments on delayed draw term loans of $19.0 million and unfunded equity commitments of $25.4 million. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had unfunded equity commitments of $9.2 million. The unfunded commitments are disclosed in the Company's Consolidated Schedule of Investments.

Litigation
 
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material legal proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company.
 
Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote.

Note 8 — Economic Dependency
 
Under various agreements, the Company has engaged or will engage the Adviser and its affiliates and entities under common ownership with the Adviser to provide certain services that are essential to the Company, including asset management services, asset acquisition and disposition decisions, transfer agency services, the sale of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance, as well as other administrative responsibilities for the Company including accounting services, transaction management and investor relations.
      
As a result of these relationships, the Company is dependent upon the Adviser and its affiliates. In the event that these companies were unable to provide the Company with the respective services, the Company would be required to find alternative providers of these services.

Note 9 — Common Stock

On August 25, 2011, the Company had raised sufficient funds to break escrow on its IPO and through September 30, 2013 , the Company sold 47.5 million shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $504.4 million , including shares purchased by the Sponsor and shares issued under the DRIP. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had repurchased 0.1 million shares of common stock for payments of $ 1.1 million.

The following table reflects the common stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands except share amounts):

 
 
Shares
 
Value
Shares Sold
 
32,032,968

 
$
346,448

Shares Issued through DRIP
 
634,705

 
6,262

Share Repurchases
 
(77,941
)
 
(792
)
 
 
32,589,732

 
$
351,918


    





33

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

The following table reflects the common stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands except share amounts):

 
 
Shares
 
Value
Shares Sold
 
8,679,752

 
$
88,007

Shares Issued through DRIP
 
102,185

 
981

 
 
8,781,937

 
$
88,988


Note 10 — Share Repurchase Program

The Company intends to conduct quarterly tender offers pursuant to its share repurchase program. The Company’s board of directors will consider the following factors, among others, in making its determination regarding whether to cause the Company to offer to repurchase shares and under what terms:

 
the effect of such repurchases on the Company's qualification as a RIC (including the consequences of any necessary asset sales);
 
the liquidity of the Company's assets (including fees and costs associated with disposing of assets);
 
the Company's investment plans and working capital requirements;
 
the relative economies of scale with respect to the Company's size;
 
the Company's history in repurchasing shares or portions thereof; and
 
the condition of the securities markets.
    
The Company currently intends to limit the number of shares to be repurchased during any calendar year to the number of shares it can repurchase with the proceeds it receives from the sale of shares under its DRIP. At the discretion of the Company’s board of directors, the Company may also use cash on hand, cash available from borrowings and cash from liquidation of securities investments as of the end of the applicable period to repurchase shares. In addition, as of September 30, 2013, the Company will limit the number of shares to be repurchased in any calendar year to 10% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding in the prior calendar year, or 2.5% in each quarter, though the actual number of shares that the Company offers to repurchase may be less in light of the limitations noted above. The Company will offer to repurchase such shares on each date of repurchase at a price equal to 92.5% of the public offering price in effect on each date of repurchase, which will be determined in the same manner that the Company determined the public offering price per share for purposes of its continuous public offering. The Company’s board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the repurchase program at any time upon 30 days’ notice. The first quarterly tender offer commenced on September 12, 2012 and was completed on October 8, 2012. Upon completion of its first quarterly tender offer, on October 8, 2012, the Company repurchased 0 shares at the offered price of $9.7125 per share for aggregate consideration totaling $0. The second quarterly tender offer commenced on December 13, 2012 and was completed on January 15, 2013. Upon completion of this tender offer on January 15, 2013, the Company repurchased 10,732 shares at the offered price of $9.8975 per share for aggregate consideration totaling $0.1 million. The third quarterly tender offer commenced on March 27, 2013, which was completed on April 25, 2013. Upon completion of this tender offer, the Company repurchased 29,625 shares at the offered price of $10.18 per share for aggregate consideration totaling $0.3 million. The fourth quarterly tender offer commenced on July 15, 2013, which was completed on August 13, 2013. Upon completion of this tender offer, the Company repurchased 30,365 shares at the offered price of $10.18 per share for aggregate consideration totaling $0.3 million.

Note 11 — Net Increase in Net Assets

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. The Company had no potentially dilutive securities as of September 30, 2013 and 2012.

34

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)


The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share from operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts):

 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Basic and diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
 
$
13,715

 
$
3,862

 
$
28,568

 
$
5,810

Weighted average common shares outstanding
 
41,498,369

 
8,297,178

 
29,615,011

 
5,042,363

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share - basic and diluted
 
$
0.33

 
$
0.47

 
$
0.96

 
$
1.15


On February 5, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared an increase to its public offering price per share from $10.70 to $10.80, which became effective for shares purchased in the semi-monthly closing on February 18, 2013. The Company's board of directors also approved an increase of the Company's annualized distribution, in order to sustain a 7.75% annualized distribution rate, based upon the increase to the Company's public offering price.


On February 25, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared an increase to its public offering price per share from $10.80 to $10.90, which became effective for shares purchased in the semi-monthly closing on March 1, 2013. The Company's board of directors also approved an increase of the Company's annualized distribution, in order to sustain a 7.75% annualized distribution rate, based upon the increase to the Company's public offering price.

On April 3, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared an increase of the Company's public offering price of its common shares from $10.90 to $11.00 per share. The increase became effective with the Company's semi-monthly closing scheduled on or about April 16, 2013. The Company's board of directors also approved an increase of the Company's annualized distribution, in order to sustain a 7.75% annualized distribution rate, based upon the increase to the Company's public offering price.

On August 15, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared an increase of the Company's public offering price of its common shares from $11.00 to $11.10 per share. The increase became effective with the Company's semi-monthly closing, which occurred on August 16, 2013 and is consistent with the Company's pricing policy, which ensures that its net offering price per share will not be less than its net asset value per share. The Company's board of directors also approved an increase of the Company's annualized distribution, in order to sustain a 7.75% annualized distribution rate, based upon the increase to the Company's public offering price.

Note 12 — Distributions

The Company has declared and paid cash distributions to stockholders on a monthly basis since it commenced operations. From time to time, the Company may also pay interim distributions at the discretion of its board of directors. The Company may fund its cash distributions to stockholders from any sources of funds available to it, including offering proceeds, borrowings, net investment income from operations, capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets and non-capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets. The Company’s distributions may exceed its earnings, especially during the period before the Company has substantially invested the proceeds from its IPO. As a result, a portion of the distributions the Company will make may represent a return of capital for tax purposes. As of September 30, 2013 , the Company had accrued $3.3 million in stockholder distributions that were unpaid. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued $1.0 million in stockholder distributions that were unpaid.
    

35

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

The following table reflects the cash distributions per share that we have paid on our common stock to date (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):

Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Per share
 
Distributions Paid in Cash
 
Distributions Paid Through the DRIP
 
Total Distributions Paid
2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2011
 
October 3, 2011
 
$
0.07

 
$
13

 
$
13

 
$
26

October 31, 2011
 
November 1, 2011
 
0.07

 
20

 
14

 
34

November 30, 2011
 
December 1, 2011
 
0.06

 
25

 
17

 
42

December 31, 2011
 
January 3, 2012
 
0.06

 
35

 
21

 
56

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
93

 
$
65

 
$
158

2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 31, 2012
 
February 1, 2012
 
$
0.06

 
$
47

 
$
26

 
$
73

February 29, 2012
 
March 1, 2012
 
0.06

 
80

 
34

 
114

March 31, 2012
 
April 2, 2012
 
0.06

 
118

 
48

 
166

April 30, 2012
 
May 1, 2012
 
0.06

 
157

 
65

 
222

May 31, 2012
 
June 1, 2012
 
0.07

 
289

 
91

 
380

June 30, 2012
 
July 2, 2012
 
0.06

 
313

 
113

 
426

July 31, 2012
 
August 1, 2012
 
0.07

 
361

 
146

 
507

August 31, 2012
 
September 4, 2012
 
0.07

 
394

 
173

 
567

September 30, 2012
 
October 1, 2012
 
0.06

 
429

 
203

 
632

October 31, 2012
 
November 1, 2012
 
0.07

 
505

 
247

 
752

November 30, 2012
 
December 3, 2012
 
0.07

 
612

 
287

 
899

December 17, 2012
 
December 27, 2012
 
0.09

 
917

 
462

 
1,379

December 31, 2012
 
January 2, 2013
 
0.07

 
682

 
341

 
1,023

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
4,904

 
$
2,236

 
$
7,140

2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 31, 2013
 
February 1, 2013
 
$
0.07

 
$
787

 
$
395

 
$
1,182

February 28, 2013
 
March 1, 2013
 
0.06

 
797

 
408

 
1,205

March 31, 2013
 
April 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,008

 
525

 
1,533

April 30, 2013
 
May 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,099

 
589

 
1,688

May 31, 2013
 
June 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,276

 
755

 
2,031

June 30, 2013
 
July 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,396

 
893

 
2,289

July 31, 2013
 
August 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,608

 
1,071

 
2,679

August 31, 2013
 
September 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,765

 
1,285

 
3,050

September 30, 2013
 
October 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
1,868

 
1,407

 
3,275

October 31, 2013
 
November 1, 2013
 
0.07

 
2,093

 
1,671

 
3,764

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
13,697

 
$
8,999

 
$
22,696


The following table reflects the stock distributions per share that the Company declared on its common stock to date:

Date Declared
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Per Share
 
Distribution Percentage
 
Shares Issued
March 29, 2012
 
May 1, 2012
 
May 2, 2012
 
$
0.05

 
0.49
%
 
25,709


36

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)


The Company has not established any limit on the extent to which it may use borrowings, if any, or proceeds from its IPO to fund distributions (which may reduce the amount of capital it ultimately invests in assets). There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sustain distributions at any particular level.

On March 1, 2012, the price for newly-issued shares under the DRIP issued to stockholders was changed from 95% to 90% of the stock price that the shares are sold in the offering as of the date the distribution is made.

Note 13 — Financial Highlights

The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 , and 2012:
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Per share data:
 
 
 
Net asset value, beginning of period
$
9.41

 
$
9.00

 
 
 
 
Results of operations (1)
       Net investment income
0.24

 
0.55

Net realized and unrealized appreciation on investments
0.36

 
0.41

Net realized and unrealized appreciation on total return swap
0.37

 
0.19

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
0.97

 
1.15

 
 
 
 
Stockholder distributions (2)
       Distributions from net investment income
(0.24
)
 
(0.55
)
Distributions from net realized capital gain on investments and total return swap
(0.40
)
 
(0.11
)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions
(0.64
)
 
(0.66
)
 
 
 
 
Capital share transactions
       Issuance of common stock (3)
0.25

 
0.18

Repurchases of common stock (4)

 

Offering costs
(0.18
)
 
(0.23
)
Net increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions
0.07

 
(0.05
)
Net asset value, end of period
$
9.81

 
$
9.44

Shares outstanding at end of period
47,532,948

 
9,821,991

Total return (6)
11.16
%
 
11.97
%
Ratio/Supplemental data:
 

 
 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)
$
466,527

 
$
92,680

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (5)(8)
3.28
%
 
7.85
%
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets (5)(8)
5.05
%
 
2.79
%
Ratio of incentive fees to average net assets (5)(8)
1.79
%
 
%
Ratio of credit facility related expenses to average net assets (8)
0.63
%
 
1.20
%
Portfolio turnover rate (7)
71.17
%
 
91.01
%







37

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)

_______________

(1)  
The per share data was derived by using the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Net investment income per share excluding the expense support reimbursement and waiver of management and incentive fees equals $0.18 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 . Net investment income per share excluding the expense support reimbursement and waiver of management and incentive fees equals $ 0.80 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 .

(2)  
The per share data for distributions reflects the actual amount of distributions declared per share during the period.

(3)  
The issuance of common stock on a per share basis reflects the incremental net asset value changes as a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Company’s continuous offering.

(4)  
The per share impact of the Company's repurchases of common stock is a reduction to net asset value of less than
$0.01 per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The Company had no repurchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

(5)  
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 , excluding the expense support reimbursements and waiver of management and incentive fees, the ratio of net investment income, operating expenses and incentive fees to average net assets was 2.43% , 5.90% and 2.64%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 , excluding the expense support reimbursement and waiver of management and incentive fees, the ratio of net investment income, operating expenses and incentive fees to average net assets was 2.76% , 7.88% and 2.06%, respectively.

(6)  
Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of shares of common stock at the current net asset value on the first day and a sale at the current net asset value on the last day of the periods reported. Distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the DRIP. The total return based on net asset value for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 , includes the effect of the expense support reimbursement and waiver of management and incentive fees which equaled 0.64% . The total return based on net asset value for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 , includes the effect of the expense support reimbursement and waiver of management and incentive fees which equaled 3.81% .

(7)  
Portfolio turnover rate is calculated using the lesser of year-to-date purchases or sales over the average of the invested assets at fair value.

(8)  
Ratios are annualized.

38

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)


Note 14 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Form 10-Q and determined that there have been no events that have occurred that would require adjustments to the Company’s disclosures in the consolidated financial statements except for the following:

Subsequent to September 30, 2013 through the date of issuance of the financial statements included herein, the Company has purchased 19 debt investments and 4 equity investments with an aggregate face value of $115.4 million for $114.8 million in cash and sold 8 debt investments and 3 equity investments with an aggregate carrying value of $12.3 million for an aggregate redemption value of $13.0 million in cash resulting in a realized gain of $0.7 million.
    
From October 1, 2013 to November 13, 2013, the Company has issued 7.8 million shares of common stock, including shares issued pursuant to the DRIP. Total gross proceeds from these issuances, including proceeds from shares issued pursuant to the DRIP were $85.3 million.

On October 15, 2013, the Company, through 405 Sub, amended and restated its total return swap agreement (the "Fifth Amended Agreement") with Citi. The Fifth Amended Agreement increases the maximum aggregate market value of the portfolio of loans that 405 Sub may select from $275.0 million to $350.0 million.

The fifth quarterly tender offer commenced on October 22, 2013 and is expected to be completed on November 21, 2013. The maximum expected consideration for the repurchased shares would be $1.8 million based upon the maximum repurchase of 174,682 shares at $10.36 which is 92.5% of the current public offering price of $11.20.

On October 29, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared, an increase of the Company's public offering price of its common shares from $11.10 to $11.20 per share. The increase became effective with the Company's semi-monthly closing, which occurred on November 1, 2013, and is consistent with the Company's pricing policy, which ensures that its net offering price per share will not be less than its net asset value per share. The Company's board of directors also approved an increase of the Company's annualized distribution, in order to sustain a 7.75% annualized distribution rate, based upon the increase to the Company's public offering price.


39

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)

Schedule 12-14

 
 
 
 
 
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
 
Portfolio Company
 
Investment
 
As of September 30, 2013 Number of Shares/Principal Amount
 
Amount of dividends and interest included in income
 
Amount of equity in net profit and loss
 
As of September 30, 2013 Fair Value
Affiliate Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
25,000

 
$
1,085

 
$

 
$
26,208

Garrison Funding 2013-1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
15,000

 

 

 
$
15,000

JMP Credit Advisors CLO II Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
6,000

 
333

 

 
$
6,228

NewStar Arlington Fund, LLC
 
Equity/Other
 
25,648

 
600

 

 
$
25,648

PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP
 
Equity/Other
 
10,000

 
284

 

 
$
10,287

Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, LTD. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
20,000

 

 

 
20,000

THL Credit Greenway Fund II LLC
 
Equity/Other
 
8,378

 
164

 

 
8,357

  Total Affiliate Investments
 

 

 
$
2,466

 
$

 
$
111,728


The table below represents the balance at the beginning of the year, December 31, 2012 and any gross additions and reductions and net unrealized gain (loss) made to such investments as well as the ending fair value as of September 30, 2013.

Gross additions represent increases in the investment from additional investments, payments in kind of interest or dividends.

Gross reductions represent decreases in the investment from sales of investments or repayments.

 
Beginning Fair Value December 31, 2012
 
Gross additions
 
Gross reductions
 
Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
Fair Value at September 30, 2013
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes
$

 
$
23,000

 
$

 
$
3,208

 
$
26,208

Garrison Funding 2013-1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes

 
15,000

 

 

 
15,000

JMP Credit Advisors CLO II Ltd. Subordinated Notes

 
5,700

 

 
528

 
6,228

NewStar Arlington Fund, LLC

 
25,648

 

 

 
25,648

PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP
5,137

 
5,000

 

 
150

 
10,287

Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, LTD. Subordinated Notes

 
20,000

 

 

 
20,000

THL Credit Greenway Fund II LLC

 
9,902

 
(1,524
)
 
(21
)
 
8,357






40


BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)


Schedule 12-14

 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
Portfolio Company
 
Investment
 
As of December 31, 2012 Number of Shares/Principal Amount
 
Amount of dividends and interest included in income
 
Amount of equity in net profit and loss
 
As of December 31, 2012 Fair Value
Affiliate Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP
 
Equity/Other
 
5,000

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,137

  Total Affiliate Investments
 
 
 
 
 
$

 
$

 
$
5,137


The table below represents the balance at the beginning of the year, December 31, 2011 and any gross additions and reductions and net unrealized gain (loss) made to such investments as well as the ending fair value as of December 31, 2012.

Gross additions represent increases in the investment from additional investments, payments in kind of interest or dividends.

Gross reductions represent decreases in the investment from sales of investments or repayments.

 
Beginning Fair Value December 31, 2011
 
Gross additions
 
Gross reductions
 
Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP
$

 
$
5,000

 
$

 
$
137

 
$
5,137





41



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Business Development Corporation of America and the notes thereto, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We are externally managed by our adviser, BDCA Adviser, LLC (the "Adviser").

The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may include statements as to:
•     our future operating results;
•     our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;
•     the impact of the investments that we expect to make;
•     the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
•     our expected financings and investments;
•     the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;
•     the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;
•     actual and potential conflicts of interest with our Adviser and its affiliates;
•     the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its effect on the industries in which we invest;
•     the ability to qualify and maintain our qualification as a RIC and a BDC; and
•     the impact on our business of Dodd-Frank and the rules and regulations issued thereunder.

In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect” and “intend” indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:

•     changes in the economy;
•     risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or the economy generally due to terrorism or natural
disasters; and
•     future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas.

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

We are a specialty finance company incorporated in Maryland in May 2010. We are an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). We are therefore required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. We have elected to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and intend to qualify annually, hereafter, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We are managed by BDCA Adviser, LLC (the "Adviser"), a private investment firm that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The Adviser oversees the management of our activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to our portfolio. Our Adviser is controlled by Nicholas S. Schorsch, our chairman and chief executive officer, and William M. Kahane, one of our directors, through their ownership of AR Capital, LLC (the "Sponsor").


42



On January 25, 2011, we commenced our initial public offering (the “IPO”) on a “reasonable best efforts basis” of up to 150.0 million shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at an initial offering price of $10.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts, pursuant to a registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-166636) (the “Registration Statement”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We sold 22,222 shares of common stock to our Adviser on July 8, 2010 at $9.00 per share, which represents the initial public offering price of $10.00 per share minus selling commissions of $0.70 per share and dealer manager fees of $0.30 per share. On August 25, 2011, we raised sufficient funds to break escrow on our IPO and commenced operations as of that date. As of September 30, 2013, we had issued 47.5 million shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $ 504.4 million including the shares purchased by the Sponsor and shares issued under our distribution reinvestment plan ("DRIP"). As of September 30, 2013, we had repurchased 0.1 million shares of common stock for payments of $ 1.1 million.

On July 13, 2012, we, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, 405 TRS I, LLC (“405 Sub”), entered into a total return swap agreement (“TRS”) with Citibank, N.A. (“Citi”), which was last amended July 18, 2013 to increase the aggregate market value of the portfolio of loans selected by 405 Sub to $275.0 million. 405 Sub is included within our consolidated financial statements. As amended, the TRS provides that 405 Sub may select a portfolio of loans with a maximum aggregate value (determined at the time such loans become subject to the TRS) of $275.0 million. The consolidated financial statements include both our accounts and the accounts of 405 Sub. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

On July 24, 2012, we, through a newly-formed, wholly-owned special purpose financing subsidiary, BDCA Funding I, LLC (“Funding I”), entered into a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as lender, Wells Fargo Securities, as administrative agent (together, “Wells Fargo”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent, account bank and collateral custodian. The Credit Facility which was last amended on September 9, 2013, provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million on a committed basis, with a term of 60 months. Funding I is included within our consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include both our accounts and the accounts of Funding I. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We anticipate that during our offering period we will invest largely in first and second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt issued by middle market companies. We may also purchase interests in loans through secondary market transactions in the "over-the-counter" market for institutional loans. First and second lien secured loans generally are senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt and equity in bankruptcy priority and are generally secured by liens on the operating assets of a borrower which may include inventory, receivables, plant, property and equipment. Mezzanine debt is subordinated to senior loans and is generally unsecured. We define middle market companies as those with annual revenues between $10 million and $1 billion. We expect that our investments will generally range between approximately $1 million and $25 million, although this investment size will vary proportionately with the size of our capital base. As we increase our capital base during our offering period, we will begin investing in, and ultimately intend to have a substantial portion of our assets invested in customized direct loans to and equity securities of middle market companies. In most cases, companies to whom we provide customized financing solutions will be privately held at the time we invest in them.

As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of U.S. operating companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange, U.S. operating companies with listed securities that have equity market capitalizations of less than $250 million, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. In addition, we are only allowed to borrow money such that our asset coverage, which, as defined in the 1940 Act, measures the ratio of total assets less total liabilities (excluding borrowings) to total borrowings, equals at least 200% after such borrowing, with certain limited exceptions.

Investment Advisory and Administration Agreements

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Services Agreement we have with the Adviser (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), we pay the Adviser a fee for its services consisting of two components - a management fee and an incentive fee. The management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.5% of our average gross assets and is payable quarterly in arrears.

The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which we refer to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding quarter. The payment of the subordinated incentive fee on income is subject to payment of a preferred return to investors each quarter, expressed as a quarterly rate of return on adjusted capital at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 1.75% (7.00% annualized), subject to a “catch up” feature.
    

43



The second part of the incentive fee, referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, is an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee equals 20.0% of our incentive fee capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.

We have entered into a fund administration servicing agreement and a fund accounting servicing agreement with US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (the “Administrator”). The Administrator provides services, such as accounting, financial reporting, legal and compliance support and investor relations support, necessary to operate. On August 13, 2012, we entered into a custody agreement with U.S. Bank National Association (“US Bank”). Under the custody agreement, US Bank will hold all of our portfolio securities and cash for certain of our subsidiaries, and will transfer such securities or cash pursuant to our instructions. The custody agreement is terminable by either party, without penalty, on not less than ninety days prior notice to the other party. The Dealer Manager, an entity under common ownership with the Sponsor, serves as the dealer manager of the IPO. The Adviser and the Dealer Manager are related parties and will receive compensation and fees for services related to the IPO and for the investment and management of our assets. The Adviser will receive fees during the offering, operational and liquidation stages while the Dealer Manager will receive fees during the offering stage. The Adviser will pay to the Administrator a portion of the fees payable to the Adviser for the performance of these support services.

Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. As our expected operating plans occur we will describe additional critical accounting policies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements in addition to those discussed below.

Set forth below is a summary of the significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies that management believes are important to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Certain of our accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. These significant accounting estimates include:

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

Portfolio investments are reported on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities at fair value. On a quarterly basis we perform an analysis of each investment to determine fair value as follows:

Securities for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at the reported closing price on the valuation date. We may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of our investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value assets. When doing so, we determine whether the quote obtained is sufficient according to GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. If determined adequate, we use the quote obtained.


44



Investments without a readily determined market value are primarily valued using a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these approaches, the types of factors that we may take into account in fair value pricing our investments include, as relevant: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A comparables, and enterprise values, among other factors. When available, broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services are considered as an input in the valuation process.

For an investment in an investment fund that does not have a readily determinable fair value, we measure the fair value of our investment predominately based on the net asset value per share of the investment fund if the net asset value of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), Accounting Standards Codification, ("ASC"), Topic 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies, as of our measurement date. However, in determining the fair value of our investment, we may make adjustments to the net asset value per share in certain circumstances, based on our analysis of any restrictions on redemption of our shares of our investment as of the measurement date. The value of our TRS is primarily based on the increase or decrease in the value of the loans underlying the TRS, as determined by Citi based upon indicative pricing by an independent third-party pricing service.

For investments in Collateralized Securities, we model both the assets and liabilities of each Collateralized Securities' capital structure.  The model uses a waterfall engine to store the collateral data, generate collateral cash flows from the assets, and distribute the cash flows to the liability structure based on priority of payments. The waterfall cash flows are discounted using rates that incorporate risk factors such as default risk, interest rate risk, downgrade risk, and credit spread risk, among others. In addition, we consider broker quotations and/or quotations provided by pricing services as an input to determining fair value when available. 

As part of our quarterly valuation process, our Adviser may be assisted by an independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our Adviser and an independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee. Our board of directors then discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of our Adviser, the independent valuation firm (to the extent applicable) and the audit committee of our board of directors.

Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. Accordingly, the notes to our consolidated financial statements refer to the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any change in such valuations on our consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes, and intend to qualify thereafter, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Generally, a RIC is exempt from federal income taxes if it distributes to stockholders at least 90% of its ‘‘investment company taxable income,’’ as defined in the Code, each year. Distributions paid to stockholders up to one year after the current tax year can be carried back to the prior tax year for determining the distributions paid in such tax year. We intend to make sufficient distributions to maintain our RIC status each year. We are also subject to nondeductible federal excise taxes if we do not distribute at least 98% of net ordinary income each calendar year and 98.2% of capital gain net income for the one year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year, if any, and any recognized and undistributed income from prior years for which we paid no federal income taxes. We will generally endeavor each year to avoid any federal excise taxes.


45



New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)2013-08, Financial Services – Investment Companies (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946), which affects the scope, measurement and disclosure requirements for investment companies under GAAP. The amendments (i) change the approach to the investment company assessment in ASC Topic 946, clarify the characteristics of an investment company, and provide comprehensive guidance for assessing whether an entity is an investment company; (ii) require an investment company to measure non-controlling ownership interests in other investment companies at fair value rather than the equity method of accounting; and (iii) require the following additional disclosures (a) the fact that the entity is an investment company and is applying the guidance in ASC Topic 946, (b) information about changes, if any, in an entity’s status as an investment company, and (c) information about financial support provided or contractually required to be provided by an investment company to any of its investees. This guidance is effective for interim an annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013.

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance that expands the existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements, primarily for Level 3 measurements, which are measurements based on unobservable inputs such as our own data. This guidance is largely consistent with current fair value measurement principles with few exceptions that do not result in a change in general practice. The guidance became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 and, accordingly, the Company has presented the required disclosures (see Note 3 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations as the guidance relates only to disclosure requirements.

Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation

We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, but considering unamortized upfront fees and prepayment penalties. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.


46



Portfolio and Investment Activity

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we made $477.8 million of investments in new portfolio companies and had $189.0 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments, resulting in net investments of $288.8 million for the period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we made $148.2 million of investments in new portfolio companies and had $62.7 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments, resulting in net investments of $85.5 million for the period.

Our portfolio composition, based on fair value, including the value of the TRS underlying loans, at September 30, 2013 was as follows:

 
At September 30, 2013
 
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio (1)
 
Weighted Average Current Yield for Total Portfolio (2)
 
Percentage of TRS Underlying Loans
 
Weighted Average Current Yield for TRS Underlying Loans
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio Including TRS Underlying Loans
 
Weighted Average Current Yield for Total Portfolio Including TRS Underlying Loans (2)
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
46.6
%
 
7.9
%
 
89.7
%
 
7.8
%
 
61.6
%
 
7.9
%
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
12.6

 
11.4

 
10.3

 
11.0

 
11.8

 
11.2

Subordinated Debt
9.3

 
13.5

 

 

 
6.0

 
13.5

Collateralized Securities (3)
17.1

 
12.4

 

 

 
11.2

 
12.4

Equity/Other
14.4

 

 

 

 
9.4

 

Total
100.0
%
 
9.7
%
 
100.0
%
 
8.1
%
 
100.0
%
 
9.0
%

_____________________  

(1) Does not include TRS underlying loans.

(2) Excludes the effect of the amortization or accretion of loan premiums or discounts.

(3) Weighted average current yield for Collateralized Securities is based on the estimation of effective yield to expected maturity for each security as calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 325-40-35, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets (see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).

Our portfolio composition, based on fair value, including the value of the TRS underlying loans, at December 31, 2012 was as follows:
 
At December 31, 2012
 
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio (1)
 
Weighted Average Current Yield for Total Portfolio (2)
 
Percentage of TRS Underlying Loans
 
Weighted Average Current Yield for TRS Underlying Loans
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio Including TRS Underlying Loans
 
Weighted Average Current Yield for Total Portfolio Including TRS Underlying Loans (2)
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
61.9
%
 
8.4
%
 
100.0
%
 
8.1
%
 
75.1
%
 
8.3
%
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
24.5

 
12.0

 

 

 
16.0

 
12.0

Subordinated Debt
2.9

 
14.0

 

 

 
1.9

 
14.0

Collateralized Securities (3)
6.3

 
25.9

 

 

 
4.1

 
25.9

Equity/Other
4.4

 

 

 

 
2.9

 
N/A

Total
100.0
%
 
10.6
%
 
100.0
%
 
8.1
%
 
100.0
%
 
9.7
%

47




_____________________  

(1) Does not include TRS underlying loans.

(2) Excludes the effect of the amortization or accretion of loan premiums or discounts.

(3) Weighted average current yield for collateralized securities is based on interest income received for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we received $1.0 million of interest income on the collateralized securities.
    
The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping, including the TRS underlying loans, based on fair value, at September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
 
At September 30, 2013
 
Investments at Fair Value (1)
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio (1)
 
Value of TRS Underlying Loans (2)
 
Percentage of TRS Underlying Loans
 
Total Investments at Fair Value including the value of TRS Underlying Loans
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio Including the value of TRS Underlying Loans
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
$
163,593

 
37.5
%
 
$
38,957

 
16.7
%
 
$
202,550

 
30.2
%
Services: Business
60,103

 
13.8

 
26,474

 
11.3

 
86,577

 
12.9

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
35,691

 
8.2

 
22,133

 
9.5

 
57,824

 
8.6

Energy: Oil & Gas
31,077

 
7.1

 
24,080

 
10.3

 
55,157

 
8.2

Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
13,320

 
3.1

 
16,182

 
6.9

 
29,502

 
4.4

Telecommunications
22,759

 
5.2

 
6,000

 
2.6

 
28,759

 
4.3

Services: Consumer
7,654

 
1.8

 
20,184

 
8.6

 
27,838

 
4.2

Transportation: Cargo
12,393

 
2.8

 
12,209

 
5.2

 
24,602

 
3.7

Beverage, Food & Tobacco
14,812

 
3.4

 
5,458

 
2.4

 
20,270

 
3.0

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
7,478

 
1.7

 
11,839

 
5.1

 
19,317

 
2.9

High Tech Industries
8,338

 
1.9

 
8,140

 
3.5

 
16,478

 
2.5

Forest Products & Paper
8,020

 
1.8

 
7,017

 
3.0

 
15,037

 
2.2

Media: Broadcasting & Subscription
14,641

 
3.4

 

 

 
14,641

 
2.2

Environmental Industries
7,382

 
1.7

 
7,180

 
3.1

 
14,562

 
2.2

Consumer Goods: Non-durable
11,916

 
2.7

 

 

 
11,916

 
1.8

Automobile

 

 
10,038

 
4.3

 
10,038

 
1.5

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
9,804

 
2.2

 

 

 
9,804

 
1.5

Metals & Mining
3,524

 
0.8

 
4,406

 
1.9

 
7,930

 
1.2

Capital Equipment

 

 
6,943

 
2.9

 
6,943

 
1.0

Aerospace & Defense

 

 
6,253

 
2.7

 
6,253

 
0.9

Construction & Building
3,722

 
0.9

 

 

 
3,722

 
0.6

Total
$
436,227

 
100.0
%
 
$
233,493

 
100.0
%
 
$
669,720

 
100.0
%

_____________________  

(1) Does not include TRS underlying loans.

(2) The TRS underlying loans are held by our counterparty to the TRS, Citi. The values of the TRS underlying loans shown are based primarily on the indicative bid prices provided by an independent third-party pricing service to Citi.


48



The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping, including the TRS underlying loans, based on fair value, at December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
 
At December 31, 2012
 
Investments at Fair Value (1)
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio (1)
 
Value of TRS Underlying Loans (2)
 
Percentage of TRS Underlying Loans
 
Total Investments at Fair Value including the value of TRS Underlying Loans
 
Percentage of Total Portfolio Including the value of TRS Underlying Loans
Services: Business
$
24,553

 
18.0
%
 
$
13,679

 
19.0
%
 
$
38,232

 
18.4
%
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
19,090

 
14.0

 
15,064

 
20.9

 
34,154

 
16.4

Hotel, Gaming & Leisure
17,093

 
12.6

 
13,869

 
19.2

 
30,962

 
14.9

Energy: Oil & Gas
17,592

 
12.9

 

 

 
17,592

 
8.5

Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
14,422

 
10.6

 

 

 
14,422

 
6.9

Beverage, Food & Tobacco
4,162

 
3.1

 
8,008

 
11.1

 
12,170

 
5.8

High Tech Industries
10,895

 
8.0

 

 

 
10,895

 
5.2

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
3,400

 
2.6

 
6,374

 
8.8

 
9,774

 
4.7

Environmental Industries
3,915

 
2.9

 
4,893

 
6.8

 
8,808

 
4.2

Metals & Mining
3,840

 
2.8

 
4,800

 
6.7

 
8,640

 
4.1

Capital Equipment
4,005

 
2.9

 
3,504

 
4.9

 
7,509

 
3.6

Telecommunications
7,378

 
5.4

 

 

 
7,378

 
3.5

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing
1,960

 
1.4

 
1,931

 
2.6

 
3,891

 
1.9

Construction & Building
3,866

 
2.8

 

 

 
3,866

 
1.9

Total
$
136,171

 
100.0
%
 
$
72,122

 
100.0
%
 
$
208,293

 
100.0
%

_______________

(1) Does not include TRS underlying loans.

(2) The TRS underlying loans are held by our counterparty to the TRS, Citi. The values of the TRS underlying loans shown are based primarily on the indicative bid prices provided by an independent third-party pricing service to Citi.


49



The following table presents the fair value measurements at September 30, 2013 for our Level 3 investments (dollars in thousands):

Portfolio Company
 
Type of Asset
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio
ALM VI, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
$
1,941

 
0.4
%
American Importing Company, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
10,888

 
2.5
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-1, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
1,659

 
0.4
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-2, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
965

 
0.2
%
Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc.
 
Equity/Other
 
2,020

 
0.5
%
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes

 
Collateralized Securities
 
26,208

 
6.0
%
Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
4,981

 
1.1
%
EZE Trucking, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
12,393

 
2.8
%
FairPay Solutions Inc. Term Loan A
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
2,350

 
0.5
%
FairPay Solutions Inc. Term Loan B
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
7,500

 
1.7
%
Garrison Funding 2013 - 1 Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
15,000

 
3.4
%
Global Telecom & Technology, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
7,715

 
1.8
%
Gold, Inc.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
11,916

 
2.7
%
JMP Credit Advisors CLO II Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
6,228

 
1.4
%
K2 Pure Solutions Nocal, L.P.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
9,804

 
2.2
%
MBLOX Inc.
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
6,986

 
1.6
%
MBLOX Inc. - Warrants
 
Equity/Other
 
531

 
0.1
%
MC Funding Ltd. Preferred Shares
 
Collateralized Securities
 
2,709

 
0.6
%
NewStar Arlington Fund, LLC
 
Equity/Other
 
25,648

 
5.9
%
NextCare - Acquisition
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
961

 
0.2
%
NextCare
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
9,105

 
2.1
%
PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund LP
 
Equity/Other
 
10,287

 
2.4
%
PPT Management, LLC
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
2,039

 
0.5
%
S.B. Restaurant Co., Inc. - Warrants
 
Equity/Other
 
40

 
%
S.B. Restaurant Co., Inc.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
3,885

 
0.9
%
Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, LTD. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
20,000

 
4.6
%
Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
2,767

 
0.6
%
Teleflex Marine, Inc.
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
3,320

 
0.8
%
Telligent Systems, Inc.
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
5,017

 
1.2
%
Telligent Systems, Inc.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
2,000

 
0.5
%
Telligent Systems, Inc. - Warrants
 
Equity/Other
 
378

 
0.1
%
Telligent Systems, Inc. - Warrants (Third Lien Bridge Note)
 
Equity/Other
 
1,544

 
0.4
%
Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P.
 
Equity/Other
 
8,944

 
2.1
%
The SAVO Group, Ltd.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
4,997

 
1.1
%
The SAVO Group, Ltd. - Warrants
 
Equity/Other
 
1,345

 
0.3
%
The Tennis Channel Holdings, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
14,641

 
3.4
%
THL Credit Greenway Fund II LLC
 
Equity/Other
 
8,357

 
1.9
%
Trinity Consultants Holdings, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
3,099

 
0.7
%
Varel International Energy Mezzanine Funding Corp.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
10,240

 
2.3
%
Vestcom Acquisition, Inc.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
7,477

 
1.7
%
WBL SPE I, LLC
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
3,600

 
0.8
%
World Business Lenders, LLC
 
Equity/Other
 
3,750

 
0.9
%
Total Level 3 investments
 
 
 
$
285,235

 
65.3
%
    

50



The following table presents the fair value measurements at December 31, 2012 for our Level 3 investments (dollars in thousands):

Portfolio Company
 
Type of Asset
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio
ALM VI, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
$
2,030

 
1.4
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-1, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
1,950

 
1.3
%
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2012-2, Ltd. Subordinated Notes
 
Collateralized Securities
 
953

 
0.6
%
ConvergeOne Holdings Corp.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
3,876

 
2.7
%
Creative Circle, LLC
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
9,788

 
7.2
%
Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
5,000

 
3.7
%
MC Funding Ltd. Preferred Shares
 
Collateralized Securities
 
3,600

 
2.6
%
PennantPark Credit Opportunity Fund, LP
 
Equity/Other
 
5,137

 
3.8
%
Permian Tank & Manufacturing, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
1,578

 
1.2
%
PPT Management, LLC
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
1,989

 
1.5
%
Precision Dermatology, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
4,996

 
3.7
%
Precision Dermatology, Inc. - Warrants
 
Equity/Other
 

 
%
S.B. Restaurant Co., Inc.
 
Subordinated Debt
 
3,939

 
2.9
%
S.B. Restaurant Co., Inc. - Warrants
 
Equity/Other
 
223

 
0.2
%
Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
 
Senior Secured First Lien Debt
 
2,963

 
2.2
%
Teleflex Marine, Inc.
 
Senior Secured Second Lien Debt
 
3,258

 
2.5
%
Tennenbaum Waterman Fund, L.P.
 
Equity/Other
 
752

 
0.7
%
Total Level 3 investments
 
 
 
$
52,032

 
38.2
%

The following table presents the percentage of amortized cost by loan market for investments, including the TRS underlying loans, as of September 30, 2013:

 
Amortized Cost as of September 30, 2013
 
Investments per Total Portfolio
 
TRS Underlying Loans
 
Total Portfolio including TRS Underlying Loans
Middle Market (1)
68.3
%
 
93.7
%
 
77.2
%
Large Corporate (2)
1.3

 
6.3

 
3.0

Other (3)
30.4

 

 
19.8

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%

______________

(1) Middle market represents companies whose annual revenues are between $10 million and $1 billion.
(2) Large corporate represents companies whose annual revenues are in excess of $1 billion.
(3) Other represents collateralized securities and equity investments.


51



The following table presents the percentage of amortized cost by loan market for investments, including the TRS underlying loans, as of December 31, 2012:
 
Amortized Cost as of December 31, 2012
 
Investments per Total Portfolio
 
TRS Underlying Loans
 
Total Portfolio including TRS Underlying Loans
Middle Market (1)
79.5
%
 
100.0
%
 
86.6
%
Large Corporate (2)
9.9

 

 
6.5

Other (3)
10.6

 

 
6.9

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
    
______________

(1) Middle market represents companies whose annual revenues are between $10 million and $1 billion.
(2) Large corporate represents companies whose annual revenues are in excess of $1 billion.
(3) Other represents collateralized securities and equity investments.
    
The following table presents the percentage of fair value by loan market for investments, including the TRS underlying loans, as of September 30, 2013:
 
Fair Value as of September 30, 2013
 
Investments per Total Portfolio
 
TRS Underlying Loans
 
Total Portfolio including TRS Underlying Loans
Middle Market (1)
67.2
%
 
93.8
%
 
76.5
%
Large Corporate (2)
1.3

 
6.2

 
3.0

Other (3)
31.5

 

 
20.5

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%

______________

(1) Middle market represents companies whose annual revenues are between $10 million and $1 billion.
(2) Large corporate represents companies whose annual revenues are in excess of $1 billion.
(3) Other represents collateralized securities and equity investments.

The following table presents the percentage of fair value by loan market for investments, including the TRS underlying loans, as of December 31, 2012:

 
Fair Value as of December 31, 2012
 
Investments per Total Portfolio
 
TRS Underlying Loans
 
Total Portfolio including TRS Underlying Loans
Middle Market (1)
79.2
%
 
100.0
%
 
86.4
%
Large Corporate (2)
10.0

 

 
6.6

Other (3)
10.8

 

 
7.0

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%

______________

(1) Middle market represents companies whose annual revenues are between $10 million and $1 billion.
(2) Large corporate represents companies whose annual revenues are in excess of $1 billion.
(3) Other represents collateralized securities and equity investments.


52



Portfolio Asset Quality

Our Adviser employs an investment rating system to categorize our investments. In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, our Adviser grades the credit risk of all debt investments on a scale of 1 to 5 no less frequently than quarterly. This system is intended primarily to reflect the underlying risk of a portfolio debt investment relative to the inherent risk at the time the original debt investment was made (i.e., at the time of acquisition), although it may also take into account under certain circumstances the performance of the portfolio company's business, the collateral coverage of the investment and other relevant factors.
 Loan Rating
 
Summary Description
1
  
Debt investment exceeding fundamental performance expectations and/or capital gain expected. Trends and risk factors since the time of investment are favorable.
 
 
2
  
Performing consistent with expectations and a full return of principal and interest expected. Trends and risk factors are neutral to favorable. All investments are initially rated a “2”.
 
 
3
  
Performing debt investment requiring closer monitoring. Trends and risk factors show some deterioration.
 
 
4
  
Underperforming debt investment. Some loss of interest or dividend expected, but still expecting a positive return on investment. Trends and risk factors are negative.
 
 
5
  
Underperforming debt investment with expected loss of interest and some principal.

The weighted average risk rating of our investments based on amortized cost was 2.02 as of September 30, 2013 and 2.03 as of December 31, 2012.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Total investment income
$
8,395

 
$
1,973

Total expenses, net
4,711

 
609

Net investment income
3,684

 
1,364

Net realized gain from investments
429

 
344

Net realized gain from total return swap
4,045

 
390

Net unrealized appreciation on investments
5,524

 
1,184

Net unrealized appreciation on total return swap
33

 
580

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
$
13,715

 
$
3,862


 


53



 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Total investment income
$
17,926

 
$
3,740

Total expenses, net
10,865

 
980

Net investment income
7,061

 
2,760

Net realized gain from investments
2,163

 
926

Net realized gain from total return swap
8,715

 
390

Net unrealized appreciation on investments
8,282

 
1,154

Net unrealized appreciation on total return swap
2,347

 
580

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
$
28,568

 
$
5,810


Investment Income

The increase in total investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, was primarily due to the increase in the size of the portfolio. Portfolio investments, at amortized cost, increased from $100.9 million at September 30, 2012 to $426.7 million at September 30, 2013.

Operating Expenses

The composition of our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Interest and credit facility financing expenses
$
590

 
$
192

Professional fees
662

 
137

Directors fees
18

 
18

Insurance
56

 
51

Management fees
1,829

 
402

Subordinated income incentive fees
1,768

 
273

Capital gains incentive fees
1,191

 
299

Other administrative
17

 
35

Expenses before expense waivers and reimbursements from Adviser
6,131

 
1,407

Waiver of management and incentive fees
(1,420
)
 
(798
)
Total expenses net of expense waivers and reimbursements from Adviser
$
4,711

 
$
609


    


54



 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Interest and credit facility financing expenses
$
1,359

 
$
420

Professional fees
1,474

 
364

Directors fees
51

 
57

Insurance
167

 
154

Management fees
3,866

 
730

Subordinated income incentive fees
3,597

 
552

Capital gains incentive fees
2,089

 
416

Other administrative
89

 
75

Expenses before expense waivers and reimbursements from Adviser
12,692

 
2,768

Waiver of management and incentive fees
(1,827
)
 
(1,522
)
Expense support reimbursements from Adviser

 
(266
)
Total expenses net of expense waivers and reimbursements from Adviser
$
10,865

 
$
980


Interest and credit facility expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased from the corresponding period in 2012 due to the increase in the average amount of debt outstanding from $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $34.8 million for the comparable period in 2013. Interest and credit facility expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were comprised of amortization of deferred financing costs related to our Credit Facility.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we incurred $1.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, of management fees, of which the Adviser waived none of such fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of management fees, of which the Adviser waived $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we incurred $1.8 million, and $3.6 million, respectively, of incentive fees, of which the Adviser waived $1.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, incentive fees of $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, were incurred but waived by the Adviser. The increase in management fees was driven by an increase in average assets from $77.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $397.5 million for the comparable period in 2013. The $3.0 million and $5.7 million of incentive fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was driven by $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively, of subordinated incentive fees which are based primarily on interest income. The remainder constituted capital gains incentive fees.

We have entered into the Expense Support Agreement with our Adviser, whereby the Adviser may pay up to 100% of all of our operating expenses (“Expense Support Payment”) for any period beginning on the effective date of the Registration Statement, until we and the Adviser mutually agree otherwise. The Expense Support Payment for any month shall be paid to us by the Adviser in cash and/or offsets against amounts due from us to the Adviser. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, no Expense Support Payment was made by our Adviser. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, $0.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in Expense Support Payments were made by our Adviser.

Net Realized Gain from Investments

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we sold $53.9 million and $189.0 million, respectively, of assets, resulting in $0.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of realized gains from investments. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we had $39.2 million and $62.7 million, respectively, of principal repayments, resulting in $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of realized gains from investments.

Net Realized Gain from Total Return Swap

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we had $4.0 million, and $8.7 million, respectively, of realized gains from the TRS. Please see Note 6 – Total Return Swap – in our consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information about the realized gains generated by loans held under the TRS. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we had $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of realized gains from the TRS.

55




At September 30, 2013, the receivable and realized gain on the total return swap on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
Net Receivable
 
Net Realized Gains
Interest and other income from TRS portfolio
$
4,074

 
$
9,695

TRS interest expense
(702
)
 
(1,660
)
Gains on TRS asset sales
143

 
680

Net receivable/realized gain from TRS
$
3,515

 
$
8,715

    
At September 30, 2012, the receivable and realized gain on the total return swap on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
Net Receivable
 
Net Realized Gains
Interest and other income from TRS portfolio
$
379

 
$
427

TRS interest expense
(74
)
 
(81
)
Gains on TRS asset sales
43

 
44

Net receivable/realized gain from TRS
$
348

 
$
390


Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation on Investments

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, our investments had $5.5 million and $8.3 million, respectively, of unrealized appreciation. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, our investments had $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of unrealized appreciation.

Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation on Total Return Swap

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, our investments in the TRS had $0.03 million and $2.3 million of unrealized appreciation. The appreciation of the investments in the TRS was driven by the decrease in yields on comparable assets in the market. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, our investments in the TRS had $0.6 million and $0.6 million of unrealized appreciation.

Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $284.2 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, redemptions and sales of portfolio investments, among other factors. The increase in cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to $477.8 million for purchases of investments partially offset by $189.0 million for sales and repayments of investments and $7.1 million from a net increase in net investment income. The purchase and sales activity is driven by the increase in investment activity resulting from the continuous equity capital raising and growing capital base.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $325.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 primarily related to net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $310.7 million and proceeds from the Credit Facility of $57.5 million. These inflows were partially offset by principal repayments on debt of $29.7 million and payments of stockholder distributions of $10.4 million. Consistent with the increase in investment activity, the proceeds from the issuance of common stock are the result of our increasing equity raise capabilities.


56



Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
    
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash used in operating activities was $83.0 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, redemptions and sales of portfolio investments, among other factors. Cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were mainly due to a net increase in net assets of $5.8 million adjusted for $148.3 million for purchases of investments, $3.5 million from increase in unsettled trades receivable, $0.9 million from net realized gain from investments, $1.2 million from net unrealized appreciation on investments, $0.6 million from net unrealized appreciation on total return swap, $0.3 million from increase in receivable due on total return swap, $11.4 million from increase in cash collateral on deposit with custodian, $0.1 million from increase in prepaid expenses and other assets, $0.02 million from decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses and $1.0 million from increase in interest receivable offset by cash provided by operating activities of $62.7 million for repayments of investments, $15.6 million from increase in unsettled trades payable, $0.1 million from increase in interest and credit facility fees payable and a non-cash item of $0.1 million (amortization of deferred credit facility financing costs).

Net cash provided by financing activities of $87.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 related to net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $81.1 million and proceeds from the Credit Facility of $18.9 million. These inflows were partially offset by payments of deferred offering costs of $0.4 million, payments of financing cost of $0.8 million, principal repayments of debt of $10.0 million and payments of stockholder distributions of $1.8 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We generate cash from the net proceeds of our ongoing continuous public offering and from cash flows from fees, interest and dividends earned from our investments, as well as proceeds from sales of our investments. The Registration Statement offering for sale up to approximately $1.5 billion of shares of our common stock (150.0 million shares at an initial offering price of $10.00 per share) (the "Offering"), was declared effective on January 27, 2011. As of September 30, 2013, we had issued 47.5 million shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of $ 504.4 million , including shares issued to the Sponsor and shares issued under the DRIP.
 
Our principal demands for funds in both the short-term and long-term are for portfolio investments, either directly or through investment interests, for the payment of operating expenses, distributions to our investors, repurchases under our share repurchase program, and for the payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. Generally, capital needs for investment activities will be met through net proceeds received from the sale of common stock through our public offering. We may also from time to time enter into other agreements with third parties whereby third parties will contribute to specific investment opportunities. Items other than investment acquisitions are expected to be met from a combination of the proceeds from the sale of common stock, cash flows from operations, and, during our IPO, reimbursements from the Adviser.

We have entered into the Expense Support Agreement with our Adviser, whereby the Adviser may pay the Expense Support Payment for any period beginning on the effective date of the Registration Statement, until we and the Adviser mutually agree otherwise. The purpose of the Expense Support Agreement was to reduce our offering and operating expenses until we had achieved economies of scale sufficient to ensure that we were able to bear a reasonable level of expense in relation to our investment income. The Expense Support Payment for any month shall be paid to us by the Adviser in cash and/or offsets against amounts due from us to the Adviser. Operating expenses subject to this agreement include expenses as defined by U.S. GAAP, including, without limitation, advisory fees payable and interest on indebtedness for such period, if any. As of September 30, 2013, the Adviser had made payments to the Company for $1.0 million of expenses pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement. See Note 4 - Related Party Transactions and Arrangements - Expense Support Agreement - in our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information on this arrangement, including Expense Payments made by our Adviser pursuant to the terms of this agreement and the ability of the Adviser to be reimbursed for Expense Payments made to us.

Other potential future sources of capital include proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from private offerings, proceeds from the sale of investments and undistributed funds from operations. However, our ability to incur additional debt will be dependent on a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions that may be imposed by lenders. Our ability to raise proceeds in our public offering will be dependent on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions for BDCs and market perceptions about us.


57



In January 2011, we entered into an agreement to obtain a revolving line of credit in the amount of $10.0 million with Main Street. The line of credit bore a variable interest rate based on LIBOR plus 3.50%. On July 24, 2012, we used working capital and certain proceeds from the total return swap of our subsidiary, 405 Sub, to repay all of the obligations under our credit facility with Main Street. We were not required to pay any prepayment penalty in connection with such repayment.

Total Return Swap

On July 13, 2012, we, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, 405 Sub, entered into a TRS with Citi, which was last amended on July 18, 2013, to increase the aggregate market value of the portfolio of loans selected by 405 Sub.     

A total return swap is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets underlying the total return swap, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate. The TRS effectively adds leverage to our portfolio by providing investment exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or investing directly in such market. The TRS enables us, through our ownership of 405 Sub, to obtain the economic benefit of owning the loans subject to the TRS, without actually owning them, in return for an interest type payment to Citi.

The obligations of 405 Sub under the TRS are non-recourse to us and our exposure to the TRS is limited to the amount that we contribute to 405 Sub in connection with the TRS. Generally, that amount will be the amount that 405 Sub is required to post as cash collateral for each loan (which in most instances is approximately 25% of the market value of a loan at the time that such loan is purchased). As amended, the TRS provides that 405 Sub may select a portfolio of loans with a maximum aggregate market value (determined at the time such loans become subject to the TRS) of $275.0 million.

405 Sub will pay interest to Citi for each loan at a rate equal to one-month or three-month LIBOR, depending on the terms of the underlying loan, plus 1.20% per annum. Upon the termination or repayment of any loan selected by 405 Sub under the Agreement, 405 Sub may deduct the appreciation of such loan's value from any interest owed to Citi or pay the depreciation amount to Citi in addition to remaining interest payments.

Citi may terminate any individual loan on or after July 13, 2015. However, if at any time, any particular loan fails to meet certain criteria set forth in the TRS, and such failure continues for 30 days, Citi will have the right to terminate that loan or the entire agreement with at least 10 days' notice and 405 Sub would be required to pay certain breakage costs to Citi. 405 Sub may terminate the TRS prior to July 13, 2015 but would be required to pay certain termination fees.

As of September 30, 2013, we had $58.1 million in cash held as collateral by Citi under the terms of the TRS.

Wells Fargo Credit Facility

On July 24, 2012, we, through a newly-formed, wholly-owned special purpose financing subsidiary, Funding I, entered into the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent, account bank and collateral custodian. The Credit Facility, which was last amended on September 9, 2013, provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million on a committed basis, with a term of 60 months.

We may contribute cash or loans to Funding I from time to time to retain a residual interest in any assets contributed through its ownership of Funding I or will receive fair market value for any loans sold to Funding I. Funding I may purchase additional loans from various sources. Funding I has appointed us as servicer to manage its portfolio of loans. Funding I's obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Funding I, including its portfolio of loans. The obligations of Funding I under the Credit Facility are non-recourse to us.

The Credit Facility will be priced at one month maturity LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor, plus a spread ranging between 1.75% and 2.50% per annum, depending on the composition of the portfolio of loans owned by Funding I for the relevant period. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears. Funding I will be subject to a non-usage fee to the extent the aggregate principal amount available under the Credit Facility has not been borrowed. The non-usage fee per annum for the first six months is 0.50%; thereafter, the non-usage fee per annum is 0.50% for the first 20% of the unused balance and 2.0% for the portion of the unused balance that exceeds 20%. Any amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable in April 2018.


58



Borrowings under the Credit Facility are subject to compliance with a borrowing base, pursuant to which the amount of funds advanced to Funding I varies depending upon the types of loans in Funding I's portfolio. As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with regards to the Credit Facility covenants. The Credit Facility may be prepaid in whole or in part, subject to customary breakage costs. In the event that the Credit Facility is terminated prior to the first anniversary, an additional amount is payable to Wells Fargo equal to 2.00% of the maximum amount of the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility contains customary default provisions for facilities of this type pursuant to which Wells Fargo may terminate our rights, obligations, power and authority, in our capacity as servicer of the portfolio assets under the Credit Facility, including, but not limited to, non-performance of Credit Facility obligations, insolvency, defaults of certain financial covenants and other events with respect to us that may be adverse to Wells Fargo and the secured parties under the Credit Facility.

In connection with the Credit Facility, Funding I has made certain representations and warranties, is required to comply with various covenants, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities and is subject to certain customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, Wells Fargo may declare the outstanding advances and all other obligations under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable. During the continuation of an event of default, Funding I must pay interest at a default rate.

Borrowings of Funding I will be considered our borrowings for purposes of complying with the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act applicable to BDCs.

Our cash is deposited in either commercial bank accounts or custody accounts and may be deposited in short-term, highly liquid investments that we believe provide appropriate safety of principal.

As of September 30, 2013, we had $61.7 million outstanding under the Credit Facility.

Distributions

We have declared and paid cash distributions to our stockholders on a monthly basis since we commenced operations. As of September 30, 2013, the annualized yield for distributions declared was 7.75% based on our then current public offering price of $11.00 per share. From time to time, we may also pay interim distributions at the discretion of our board of directors. Our distributions may exceed our earnings, especially during the period before we have substantially invested the proceeds from our IPO. As a result, a portion of the distributions we make may represent a return of capital for tax purposes. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we declared $9.0 million and $18.9 million, respectively, in cash distributions and paid distributions of $8.0 million and $16.7 million, respectively, which consists of $4.8 million and $10.4 million, respectively, in cash and $3.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively, issued pursuant to the DRIP. As of September 30, 2013, we had $3.3 million of distributions accrued and unpaid. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we declared $1.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively, in distributions and paid distributions of $1.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, which consists of $1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in cash and $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, issued pursuant to the DRIP.

On March 1, 2012, the price for newly-issued shares under the DRIP issued to stockholders was changed from 95% to 90% of the offering price that the shares are sold as of the date the distribution is made.

On March 29, 2012, we declared a special common stock distribution equal to $0.05 per share. The distribution was paid to stockholders of record on May 1, 2012.

On December 20, 2012, we announced that, pursuant to the authorization of our board of directors, we declared a special cash distribution equal to $0.0925 per share, to be paid to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 17, 2012, payable on December 27, 2012. This special cash distribution was paid exclusive of, and in addition to, our monthly distribution.


59



We may fund our cash distributions to stockholders from any sources of funds available to us including expense payments from our Adviser that are subject to reimbursement to it as well as offering proceeds and borrowings. We have not established limits on the amount of funds we may use from available sources to make distributions. Prior to June 30, 2012, a substantial portion of our distributions resulted from Expense Support Payments made by our Adviser that are subject to reimbursement by us within three years from the date such payment obligations were incurred. The purpose of this arrangement could be to avoid such distributions being characterized as returns of capital for GAAP or tax purposes. Despite this, we may still have distributions which could be characterized as a return of capital for tax purposes . However, during the year ended December 31, 2012, no portion of our distributions was characterized as a return of capital for tax purposes. You should understand that any such distributions were not based on our investment performance and can only be sustained if we achieve positive investment performance in future periods and/or our Adviser continues to make such reimbursements. You should also understand that our future reimbursements of such Expense Support Payments will reduce the distributions that you would otherwise receive. There can be no assurance that we will achieve the performance necessary to sustain our distributions or that we will be able to pay distributions at all. The Adviser has no obligation to make Expense Support Payments in future periods. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, if Expense Support Payments of $0.3 million were not made by our Adviser, approximately 4% percent of the distribution rate would have been a return of capital.

We consider our entire managed investment portfolio to include the investments in our portfolio included in our Consolidated Schedule of Investments as well as assets held in our TRS portfolio, which are considered off-balance sheet. Our Adviser selects and underwrites all of these investments and we measure their performance based on this managed portfolio. Our net investment income also does not include the interest income and expense related to the TRS portfolio. In accordance with GAAP, interest income and expense related to the TRS are accounted for as a component of “Net realized gain from total return swap.” The following table sets forth the computation of adjusted net investment income (loss) for the managed investment portfolio by adding the interest income from the TRS, the short-term realized gains, and the theoretical incentive fees on unrealized capital gains to the net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Net investment income
$
7,061

 
$
2,760

TRS net investment income (1)
8,034

 
346

Operating gains (short term) (2)
2,139

 
926

Incentive fees on unrealized gains (3)
1,887

 

Adjusted net investment income
$
19,121

 
$
4,032

______________

(1)  
TRS net investment income includes the interest income and expense related to the TRS portfolio. See Note 6 - Total Return Swap - in our consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information about the TRS.
(2)  
Operating gains include short-term realized gains that result primarily from active portfolio management activities. As a RIC, short-term capital gains represent operating income available for distribution and are considered ordinary income.
(3)  
Incentive fees on unrealized gains are the GAAP-required theoretical incentive fees accrued based upon unrealized portfolio appreciation. These fees reduce net investment income but are not contractually due to the Adviser. See Note 4 - Related Party Transactions and Agreements - in our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional details on the theoretical capital gains incentive fees.


60



The following table sets forth the distributions made during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Monthly distributions
$
18,932

 
$
3,087

Stock distributions

 
264

Total distributions
$
18,932

 
$
3,351


Election as a RIC

We have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2011, and intend to qualify as a RIC thereafter. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any income that we distribute to our stockholders from our tax earnings and profits. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. In addition, in order to obtain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of realized net short-term capital gain over realized net long-term capital loss, or the annual distribution requirement. Even if we qualify as a RIC, we generally will be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and could be subject to U.S. federal excise, state, local and foreign taxes. We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. Federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to 98% of net ordinary income each calendar year and 98.2% of capital gain net income for the one year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year, if any, and any recognized and undistributed income from prior years for which we paid no federal income taxes. We will generally endeavor each year to avoid any federal excise taxes.

Inflation

The impact of inflation on our portfolio depends on the type of securities we hold. When inflation occurs, the value of our equity securities may fall in the short term.  However in the long term, a company’s revenue and earnings and, therefore, the value of the equity investment, should at least increase at the same pace as inflation. The effect of inflation on debt securities is more immediate and direct as inflation may decrease the value of fixed rate debt securities. However, not all debt securities are affected equally, the longer the term of the debt security, the more volatile the value of the investment. The process through which we will value the investments in our portfolio on a quarterly basis, market quotations and our multi-step valuation process as described in our significant accounting policies, will take the effect of inflation into account.  

  Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
 
We have entered into agreements with affiliates of our Adviser, whereby we pay certain fees or reimbursements to our Adviser or its affiliates in connection with asset and service fees, reimbursement of operating costs and offering related costs. Our transfer agent, American National Stock Transfer, LLC, is a related party. The business was formed on November 2, 2012 and began providing certain transfer agency services for us on March 15, 2013. The Dealer Manager, an entity under common ownership with the Sponsor, serves as the dealer manager of our IPO. The Dealer Manager receives fees for services related to the IPO during the offering stage. See Note 4 - Related Party Transactions and Arrangements - in our consolidated financial statements included in this report for a discussion of the various related-party transactions, agreements and fees.


61










Contractual Obligations

The following table shows our payment obligations for repayment of debt and other contractual obligations at September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 
 
 
Payment Due by Period
 
Total
 
Less than 1 year
 
1 - 3 years
 
3- 5 years
 
More than 5 years
Revolving credit facility
$
61,687

 

 

 
$
61,687

 

Total contractual obligations
$
61,687

 

 

 
$
61,687

 


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources other than the TRS as discussed in the Liquidity and Capital Resources – Total Return Swap – section of Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this report.


62



ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to interest rate fluctuations. Many factors including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control contribute to interest rate risk. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes in earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, collars and treasury lock agreements, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments with fixed interest rates. During the periods covered by this report, we did not engage in interest rate hedging activities. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.

As of September 30, 2013, our debt included variable-rate debt, bearing a variable interest rate at the London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.17% at September 30, 2013 with a carrying value of $61.7 million. The following table quantifies the potential changes in interest income net of interest expense should interest rates increase by 100 or 200 basis points or decrease by 25 basis points assuming that our current balance sheet was to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity.

Change in Interest Rates
 
Estimated Percentage Change in Interest Income net of Interest Expense
(-) 25 Basis Points
 
0.33
 %
Base Interest Rate
 

(+) 100 Basis Points
 
(1.08
)
(+) 200 Basis Points
 
3.28


Because we may borrow money to make investments, our net investment income may be dependent on the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. In periods of increasing interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which may reduce our net investment income. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.
    
ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and determined that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 


63



PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Neither we nor our Adviser are currently subject to any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I., “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Other than the following, there have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

To the extent that our Adviser serves as a “joint bookrunner” in connection with the underwriting of a loan or other security to be acquired, it may be subject to underwriter liability under the federal securities laws. This liability can be managed principally through the exercise of due diligence regarding any such offering. In addition, if it acts as joint bookrunner for a loan or other securities offering and is not successful in syndicating the loan or offering, our Adviser may acquire a larger amount of the subject securities than it had planned, and it may be required to hold such loan or security for a longer period than it had anticipated.

It could be determined that our Adviser is serving as a joint bookrunner in connection with offerings of loans or other securities in connection with providing investment advisory services to us in connection with our ongoing operations and the management of our portfolio. A joint bookrunner is one of multiple lead managers of a securities issuance which syndicates the issuance of securities with other bookrunners and syndicate firms to lower the risk of selling the security for each syndicate member. In acting as a joint bookrunner, our Adviser may be required to perform due diligence on certain offerings before they are syndicated and sold, subjecting our Adviser to underwriter liabilities under federal securities laws in connection with the offer and sale of such securities. Furthermore, in leading an underwriting syndicate, our Adviser, in acting as a joint bookrunner, could be obligated to sell a large portion of an offering of securities should it be unable to put together a substantial enough underwriting syndicate, perhaps obligating it to hold such security for a longer period of time than it had originally anticipated. By being deemed a joint bookrunner, our Adviser would be obligated to perform duties for other issuers while still managing our portfolio, thus reducing the amount of time it allocates to us and subjecting it to liabilities and financial obligations.

American National Stock Transfer, LLC, our affiliated transfer agent, has a limited operating history and a failure by our transfer agent to perform its functions for us effectively may adversely affect our operations.

Our transfer agent is a related party which was recently launched as a new business. The business was formed on November 2, 2012 and has not had any significant operations to date. On March 15, 2013, our transfer agent began providing certain transfer agency services for programs sponsored directly or indirectly by AR Capital, LLC. Because of its limited experience, there is no assurance that our transfer agent will be able to effectively provide transfer agency and registrar services to us. Furthermore, our transfer agent will be responsible for supervising third party service providers who may, at times, be responsible for executing certain transfer agency and registrar services. If our transfer agent fails to perform its functions for us effectively, our operations may be adversely affected.


64



It is unclear how increased regulatory oversight and changes in the method for determining LIBOR may affect the value of the financial obligations to be held or issued by us that are linked to LIBOR, or how such changes could affect our results of operations or financial condition.
 
As a result of concerns about the accuracy of the calculation of LIBOR, a number of British Bankers' Association, or BBA, member banks entered into settlements with certain regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to the alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and there are ongoing investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions. Following a review of LIBOR conducted at the request of the U.K. government, on September 28, 2012, recommendations for reforming the setting and governing of LIBOR were released, which are referred to as the Wheatley Review. The Wheatley Review made a number of recommendations for changes with respect to LIBOR, including the introduction of S-5 statutory regulation of LIBOR, the transfer of responsibility for LIBOR from the BBA to an independent administrator, changes to the method of the compilation of lending rates and new regulatory oversight and enforcement mechanisms for rate-setting and a reduction in the number of currencies and tenors for which LIBOR is published. Based on the Wheatley Review and on a subsequent public and governmental consultation process, on March 25, 2013, the U.K. Financial Services Authority published final rules for the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority's regulation and supervision of LIBOR, which are referred to as the FCA Rules. In particular, the FCA Rules include requirements that (1) an independent LIBOR administrator monitor and survey LIBOR submissions to identify breaches of practice standards and/or potentially manipulative behavior, and (2) firms submitting data to LIBOR establish and maintain a clear conflicts of interest policy and appropriate systems and controls. The FCA Rules took effect on April 2, 2013. It is uncertain what additional regulatory changes or what changes, if any, in the method of determining LIBOR may be required or made by the U.K. government or other governmental or regulatory authorities. Accordingly, uncertainty as to the nature of such changes may adversely affect the market for or value of any LIBOR-linked securities, loans, derivatives and other financial obligations or extensions of credit held by or due to us or on our overall financial condition or results of operations. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for or value of any LIBOR-linked securities, loans, derivatives and other financial obligations or extensions of credit held by or due to us or on our overall financial condition or results of operations.



ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.


65



ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

    
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

Exhibit No.
Description
 
 
1.1
Dealer Manager Agreement with Realty Capital Securities, LLC, dated January 25, 2011 (previously filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed on March 21, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
1.2
Form of Soliciting Dealer Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit (h)(2) to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2/A filed on January 14, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
3.1
Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 13, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
3.2
Bylaws (previously filed as Exhibit (b) to the Company’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2/A filed on November 24, 2010 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.1
Second Amended and Restated Investment Advisory and Management Services Agreement dated June 5, 2013 by and between the Company and the Adviser (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 13, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.2
Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company and Main Street Capital Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit (k)(2) to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2/A filed on January 14, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.3
Revolving Promissory Note (previously filed as Exhibit (k)(3) to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2/A filed on January 14, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.4
Amended and Restated Subscription Escrow Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank (previously filed as Exhibit (k)(1) to the Company's Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2/A filed on November 4, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.5
Fund Administration Servicing Agreement by and between the Company and US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on March 31, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.6
Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement by and between the Company and US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on March 31, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference)
 
 
10.7
Distribution Reinvestment Plan (previously filed as Exhibit E to the Company's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2/A filed on November 24, 2010 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.8
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.9
Custody Agreement dated August 13, 2012 by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (previously filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference).

 
 
10.10
Expense Support Agreement dated November 9, 2011 by and between the Company and Adviser (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed on November 14, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.11
ISDA 2002 Master Agreement, together with the Schedule thereto and Credit Support Annex to such Schedule, by and between 405 TRS I, LLC and Citibank, N.A, each dated as of July 13, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference).

 
 

66



10.12
Confirmation Letter Agreement by and between 405 TRS I, LLC and Citibank, N.A., amended and restated as of May 10, 2013 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed on May 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).

 
 
10.13
Loan and Servicing Agreement, together with Exhibits thereto, among BDCA Funding I, LLC, the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Lenders and Lenders Agents from time to time party hereto and U.S. Bank National Association, each dated as of July 24, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference).

 
 
10.14
Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between the Company and BDCA Funding I, LLC, dated as of July 24, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference).

 
 
10.15
Collection Account Agreement by and among U.S. Bank National Association, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, BDCA Funding I, LLC and the Company, dated as of July 24, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2012 and herein incorporated by reference).

 
 
10.16
Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Servicing Agreement, among BDCA Funding I, LLC, the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated as of January 14, 2013 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2013 filed on May 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.17
Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Servicing Agreement, among BDCA Funding I, LLC, the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated as of April 26, 2013 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed on May 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.18
Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, entered into by and between BDCA Funding I, LLC, the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and U.S. Bank National Association, dated as of April 26, 2013 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed on May 15, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.19
Confirmation Letter Agreement by and between 405 TRS I, LLC and Citibank, N.A., amended and restated as of July 18, 2013 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 13, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
10.20
Amendment No. 3 to Loan and Servicing Agreement, among BDCA Funding I, LLC, the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated as of September 9, 2013 (filed herewith).
 
 
10.21
Confirmation Letter Agreement by and between 405 TRS I, LLC and Citibank, N.A., amended and restated as of October 15, 2013 (filed herewith and replaces Exhibits 10.12 and 10.19 presented herein.)
 
 
14
Code of Ethics (previously filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on March 31, 2011 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed on March 21, 2013 and herein incorporated by reference).
 
 
31.1
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
 
 
31.2
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
 
 
32
Written statement of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).


67



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
 
 
By: /s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
Name: Nicholas S. Schorsch
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
By: /s/ Nicholas Radesca
Name: Nicholas Radesca
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: November 13, 2013



68

Exhibit 10.20

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
LOAN AND SERVICING AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO LOAN AND SERVICING AGREEMENT , dated as of September 9, 2013 (this “ Amendment ”) is entered into by and among BDCA Funding I, LLC, as the borrower (in such capacity, the “ Borrower ”), Business Development Corporation of America, as the servicer (in such capacity, the “ Servicer ”), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the required lender (in such capacity, the “ Required Lender ”), and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as the administrative agent (in such capacity, the “ Administrative Agent ”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings provided in the Agreement (as defined below).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS , reference is made to the Loan and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2012 (as amended by certain Amendment No. 1 to the Loan and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 14, 2013 and certain Amendment No. 2 to the Loan and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2013, each by and among the Borrower, the Servicer, the Lender and the Administrative Agent and as further amended, modified, waived, supplemented or restated from time to time, the “ Agreement ”), by and among the Borrower, the Servicer, the Conduit Lenders, the Institutional Lenders, the Lender Agents, the Administrative Agent, and U.S. Bank National Association, as the collateral agent, the account bank and the collateral custodian; and
WHEREAS , the parties hereto desire to further amend the Agreement in certain respects as specified herein, pursuant to and in accordance with Section 11.01 of the Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE , based upon the above Recitals, the mutual premises and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT .
(a)    The cover page of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the figure “$100,000,000” immediately following the words “Up to” with the figure “$200,000,000”
(b)     Section 1.01 of the Agreement is hereby by amended as follows:
(i)    by amending the definition of “Adjusted Borrowing Value” by replacing the phrase “(x) $6,000,000 with respect to any Loan Asset that is a Broadly Syndicated Loan and (y) $8,000,000 with respect to any Loan Asset that is a Middle Market Loan” with the figure “$15,000,000”;
(ii)    by amending the definition of “Broadly Syndicated Loan” by removing the parenthetical phrase “(and, solely for purposes of the representations and warranties set forth in clause 41 of the Eligibility Criteria set forth in Schedule III hereto, $150,000,000)”;
(iii)    by amending the definition of “Maximum Facility Amount” by replacing the figure “$100,000,000” immediately following the words “shall not exceed” with the figure “$200,000,000”;
(iv)    by amending the definition of “Minimum Equity Amount” by replacing the figure “$32,000,000” with the figure “$50,000,000”;
(v)    by inserting the new definition “Third Amendment Effective Date” in the appropriate alphabetical order as follows:
Third Amendment Effective Date ” means September 9, 2013.
(vi)    by amending the definition of “Value Adjustment Event” by replacing clause (i)(A) in its entirety with the following:
“The Interest Coverage Ratio for any Relevant Test Period with respect to such Loan Asset is (I) less than or equal to 85% of the Interest Coverage Ratio with respect to such Loan Asset as calculated on the applicable Cut-Off Date and (II) less than 1.50 or”;
(c)    Section 2.09 of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the words “from the period beginning on April 26, 2013 to and including July 26, 2013” appearing in clause (i) of the second sentence thereof with the words “from the period beginning on September 9, 2013 to and including March 9, 2014”.
(d)    Schedule III to the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting in its entirety clause 41 of the Eligibility Criteria and renumbering the remaining clause as appropriate.
SECTION 2. AGREEMENT IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS AMENDED .
Except as specifically amended hereby, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. After this Amendment becomes effective, all references to the Agreement and corresponding references thereto or therein such as “hereof”, “herein”, or words of similar effect referring to the Agreement shall be deemed to mean the Agreement as amended hereby. This Amendment shall not be deemed to expressly or impliedly waive, amend or supplement any provision of the Agreement other than as expressly set forth herein.
SECTION 3. REPRESENTATIONS .
Each of the Borrower and the Servicer, severally for itself only, represents and warrants as of the date of this Amendment as follows:
(i) it is duly incorporated or organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization;
(ii) the execution, delivery and performance by it of this Amendment and the Agreement as amended hereby are within its powers, have been duly authorized, and do not contravene (A) its charter, by-laws, or other organizational documents, or (B) any Applicable Law;
(iii) no consent, license, permit, approval or authorization of, or registration, filing or declaration with any governmental authority, is required in connection with the execution, delivery, performance, validity or enforceability of this Amendment and the Agreement as amended hereby by or against it;
(iv) this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by it;
(v) each of this Amendment and the Agreement as amended hereby constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally or by general principles of equity; and
(vi) there is no Unmatured Event of Default, Event of Default or Servicer Termination Event.
SECTION 4. CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS .
The effectiveness of this Amendment is conditioned upon: (i) payment of the invoiced outstanding fees and disbursements of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders (if any); (ii) delivery of opinions of counsel as reasonably requested by, and in form and substance satisfactory to, the Administrative Agent and (iii) delivery of executed signature pages by all parties hereto to the Administrative Agent.
SECTION 5. MISCELLANEOUS .
(a) This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by facsimile or e-mail), and by the different parties hereto on the same or separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original instrument but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
(b) The descriptive headings of the various sections of this Amendment are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof.
(c) This Amendment may not be amended or otherwise modified except as provided in the Agreement.
(d) The failure or unenforceability of any provision hereof shall not affect the other provisions of this Amendment.
(e) Whenever the context and construction so require, all words used in the singular number herein shall be deemed to have been used in the plural number, and vice versa, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter and the neuter shall include the masculine and feminine.
(f) This Amendment and the Agreement represent the final agreement among the parties with respect to the matters set forth therein and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior, contemporaneous or subsequent oral agreements among the parties. There are no unwritten oral agreements among the parties with respect to such matters.
(g) THIS AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES UNDER THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHOICE OF LAW PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL AND NOTICE PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have caused this Amendment No. 3 to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.
BDCA FUNDING I, LLC,
as the Borrower

By: BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Member of
BDCA Funding I, LLC
By:     /s/ Nicholas Radesca     Name: Nicholas Radesca
    Title: Chief Financial Officer
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
as the Servicer
By:     /s/ Nicholas Radesca     Name: Nicholas Radesca
    Title: Chief Financial Officer


[SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as the Required Lender
By:     /s/ Raj Shah
    Name: Raj Shah
    Title: Managing Director
WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC,
as the Administrative Agent
By:     /s/ Mike Romanzo, CFA
    Name: Mike Romanzo, CFA
    Title: Director


Exhibit 10.21

 

Citibank, N.A.

390 Greenwich Street

New York, New York 10013

 

Execution Copy

 

Date: July 13, 2012 (amended and restated as of October 15, 2013)

 

To: 405 TRS I, LLC

106 York Rd.

Jenkintown, PA 19046

Attention: General Counsel

Facsimile: 646-861-7804

 

From: Citibank, N.A.
388 Greenwich Street
11th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Director Derivative Operations
Facsimile: 212-615-8594

 

Transaction Reference Number: [__________]

 

CONFIRMATION

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The purpose of this letter agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions of the Transactions entered into between Citibank, N.A. (" Citibank ") and 405 TRS I, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (" Counterparty "), on the Trade Date specified below (each, a " Transaction " and, collectively, the " Transactions "). This letter constitutes a "Confirmation" as referred to in the Master Agreement specified below.

 

The definitions and provisions contained in the 2000 ISDA Definitions (the " Definitions "), as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc., are incorporated into this Confirmation. In the event of any inconsistency between the Definitions and this Confirmation, this Confirmation shall govern. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Confirmation have the meanings assigned to them in Annex A. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Confirmation or in Annex A have the meanings assigned to them in the Definitions.

 

With effect from the Fourth Amendment Effective Date specified below, this Confirmation amends and restates the prior Confirmation dated July 13, 2012, amended and restated as of October 16, 2012, December 7, 2012, May 10, 2013, and July 18, 2013 relating to the Transactions described herein (the " Original Confirmation "), which Original Confirmation (with respect to the period from and after the Amendment Effective Date) is hereby superseded and shall be of no further force or effect.

 

1. Agreement

 

This Confirmation supplements, forms a part of and is subject to, the ISDA 2002 Master Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2012 (as amended, supplemented and otherwise modified and in effect from time to

 

  Page 1
 

time, the " Master Agreement "), between Citibank and Counterparty. All provisions contained in the Master Agreement govern this Confirmation except as expressly modified below.

 

2. Terms of Transactions

 

The terms of the particular Transactions to which this Confirmation relates are as follows:

 

General Terms:  
Trade Date: July 13, 2012
Effective Date: July 13, 2012
Amendment Effective Date: December 7, 2012
Second Amendment Effective Date: May 10, 2013
Third Amendment Effective Date: July 18, 2013
Fourth Amendment Effective Date: October 15, 2013
Scheduled Termination Date: The latest date for the final scheduled payment (or, if there is only one scheduled payment, for such scheduled payment) of principal of any Reference Obligation at any time included in the Reference Portfolio.
Termination Date: The final Scheduled Settlement Date (as defined in the Master Agreement) with respect to all Transactions (other than any Counterparty Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date).  The obligations of the parties to make payments required to be made hereunder shall survive the Termination Date.
Obligation Termination Date:

(a) In relation to any Repaid Obligation, the related Repayment Date; and

 

(b) In relation to any Terminated Obligation, the related Termination Settlement Date.

Reference Portfolio: As of any date of determination, all Reference Obligations with respect to all Transactions outstanding on such date.
Reference Obligation: Each obligation listed in Annex I as revised from time to time pursuant to this Confirmation having a Reference Amount equal to the "Reference Amount" indicated in Annex I for such obligation (and, in the case of a Committed Obligation, having an Outstanding Principal Amount equal to the "Outstanding Principal Amount" indicated in Annex I
  Page 2
 

 

 

for such Committed Obligation), in each case, subject to adjustment by the Calculation Agent in accordance with the terms of this Confirmation.

 

Counterparty may, by notice to Citibank on any Business Day on or after the Trade Date (each, an " Obligation Trade Date "), designate that any obligation (each, a " Reference Obligation " ) shall become the subject of a Transaction hereunder. Any such notice shall specify the proposed Reference Obligation and the proposed Reference Amount, Reference Entity and Initial Price in relation to such Transaction .

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such designation by Counterparty will be effective unless:

 

(a) Citibank, in its sole discretion, consents on or prior to the Obligation Trade Date to the relevant Reference Obligation becoming the subject of a Transaction hereunder with the effect set forth in the second and third paragraphs following subparagraph (c) below;

 

(b) on the Obligation Trade Date (i) the relevant Reference Obligation satisfies the Obligation Criteria set forth in Annex II and (ii) the Portfolio Criteria set forth in Annex II are satisfied (or, if any Portfolio Criterion is not satisfied immediately prior to such designation, then the extent of compliance with such Portfolio Criterion is improved); and

 

(c) if the relevant Reference Obligation would be a Non-Standard Reference Obligation, Counterparty gives notice of such fact to Citibank in such notice of designation (provided that any failure to give such notice shall not affect the effectiveness of such designation).

 

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing clause (a), Citibank may reasonably withhold its consent to any such designation based on any legal, accounting, tax or other similar issues that are adverse to Citibank in any material respect and that would or could reasonably be expected to arise as a result of the entry into such Transaction or any purchase by the Citibank Holder of such Reference Obligation as a hedge for such Transaction.

 

The " Obligation Settlement Date " for a Transaction shall be the date following the Obligation Trade Date

 

 

  Page 3
 

 

 

 for such Transaction that is customary for settlement of the related Reference Obligation substantially in accordance with the then-current market practice in the principal market for the related Reference Obligation (as determined by the Calculation Agent).

 

On the Obligation Trade Date for a Transaction, the Reference Amount of such Transaction shall, for all purposes hereof other than calculating Rate Payments, be increased by the "Reference Amount" specified in such notice from Counterparty. On the Obligation Settlement Date for a Transaction, the Reference Amount of such Transaction shall, solely for the purposes of calculating Rate Payments, be increased by the "Reference Amount" specified in such notice from Counterparty.

 

Once a Reference Obligation becomes the subject of a Transaction hereunder , Citibank shall promptly prepare and deliver to Counterparty a revised Annex I reflecting the Reference Portfolio as of the related Obligation Trade Date.

 

If any payment of interest on a Reference Obligation that would otherwise be made during the period from and including the Obligation Trade Date to but excluding the Termination Trade Date is not made but is capitalized as additional principal (without default), then the amount of interest so capitalized as principal shall become a new Transaction hereunder (a " PIK Transaction ") having the same terms and conditions as the Transaction relating to the Reference Obligation in respect of which such interest is capitalized, except that (1) the Initial Price in relation to such PIK Transaction shall be zero, (2) the Obligation Trade Date and Obligation Settlement Date for such PIK Transaction shall be the date on which such interest is capitalized and (3) the Reference Amount of such PIK Transaction will be the amount of interest so capitalized as principal. Citibank shall give notice to Counterparty after a PIK Transaction becomes outstanding as provided above, which notice shall set forth the information in the foregoing clauses (2) and (3).

Reference Entity: The borrower of the Reference Obligation identified as such in Annex I.  In addition, "Reference Entity", unless the context otherwise requires, shall also refer to any guarantor of or other obligor on the Reference Obligation.
  Page 4
 

 

Ramp-Up Period: The period from and including the Effective Date and ending on and including the date 90 days after the Amendment Effective Date.
Ramp-Down Period: The period from and including the date 60 days prior to the Scheduled Termination Date and ending on and including the Scheduled Termination Date.
Portfolio Notional Amount: As of any date of determination, the sum of the Notional Amounts for all Reference Obligations as of such date.
Notional Amount:

(a) In relation to any Transaction (other than with respect to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation), as of any date of determination, the Reference Amount of the related Reference Obligation as of such date multiplied by the Initial Price in relation to such Reference Obligation; and

 

(b) In relation to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, the amount of the reduction in the Reference Amount of the related Reference Obligation determined, in the case of a Terminated Obligation, pursuant to Clause 3 or, in the case of a Repaid Obligation, pursuant to Clause 5, in each case multiplied by the Initial Price in relation to the related Reference Obligation.

Outstanding Principal Amount: In relation to any Reference Obligation as of any date of determination, the outstanding principal amount of such obligation as shown in the then current Annex I, as increased pursuant to this Clause 2 (or, in the case of any Committed Obligation, pursuant to any borrowing in respect of such Committed Obligation after the Obligation Settlement Date) and reduced pursuant to Clauses 3 and 5.  Except as otherwise expressly provided below with respect to Counterparty First Floating Amounts, the Outstanding Principal Amount of any Committed Obligation on any date shall include the aggregate stated face amount of all letters of credit, bankers' acceptances and other similar instruments issued in respect of such Committed Obligation to the extent that the holder of such Committed Obligation is obligated to extend credit in respect of any drawing or other similar payment thereunder.
Commitment Amount: In relation to any Reference Obligation that is a Committed Obligation (and the related Transaction) as of any date of determination, the maximum outstanding principal amount of such Reference
  Page 5
 

 

Obligation that a registered holder thereof would on such date be obligated to fund (including all amounts previously funded and outstanding, whether or not such amounts, if repaid, may be reborrowed).
Notional Funded Amount:

In relation to any Reference Obligation that is a Committed Obligation (and to the related Transaction) as of any date of determination, the greater of (a) zero and (b) the sum of (i) the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Reference Obligation as of the Obligation Trade Date multiplied by the Initial Price in relation to such Reference Obligation minus (ii) the product of (x) the excess, if any, of the Commitment Amount of such Reference Obligation as of the Obligation Trade Date over the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Reference Obligation as of the Obligation Trade Date multiplied by (y) 100% minus the Initial Price in relation to such Reference Obligation plus (iii) any increase in the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Reference Obligation during the period from but excluding the Obligation Trade Date to and including such date of determination minus (iv) any decrease in the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Reference Obligation during the period from but excluding the Obligation Trade Date to and including such date of determination.

 

In relation to any Reference Obligation that is a Term Obligation (and the related Transaction) as of any date of determination, the Notional Amount of such Reference Obligation.

Portfolio Notional Funded Amount: As of any date of determination, the aggregate of all Notional Funded Amounts with respect to all Reference Obligations in the Reference Portfolio on such date of determination.
Reference Amount: In relation to (a) any Term Obligation (and the related Transaction), the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Term Obligation and (b) any Committed Obligation (and the related Transaction), the Commitment Amount of such Committed Obligation.
Utilization Amount: In relation to any Calculation Period, the daily average of the Portfolio Notional Amount during such Calculation Period.
Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount: USD350,000,000; provided that Counterparty may, by notice to Citibank given on the fifth Business Day following the last day of any Monthly Period (so long
  Page 6
 

 

as such fifth Business Day occurs prior to the six-month anniversary of the Third Amendment Effective Date) reduce the Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount to USD300,000,000; or, in either case, such greater amount as the parties may agree to in writing.
Minimum Portfolio Notional Amount An amount equal to (a) while the Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount is equal to USD350,000,000, 70% of the Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount; and (b) while the Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount is equal to USD300,000,000, 75% of the Maximum Portfolio Amount .
Business Day: New York
Business Day Convention:

Following (which shall apply to any date specified herein for the making of any payment or determination or the taking of any action which falls on a day that is not a Business Day).

 

If any anniversary date specified herein would fall on a day on which there is no corresponding day in the relevant calendar month, then such anniversary date shall be the last day of such calendar month.

Monthly Period: Each period from and including the 15th day of any calendar month to but excluding the same day of the immediately succeeding calendar month.
Calculation Agent: Citibank; provided that, if an Event of Default under Section 5(a)(i) or 5(a)(vii) with respect to Citibank shall have occurred and be continuing, then an Approved Buyer selected by Counterparty in good faith and acceptable to Citibank and that is not an Affiliate of either party shall be the Calculation Agent so long as no Event of Default with respect to Counterparty shall have occurred and be continuing.  Unless otherwise specified, the Calculation Agent shall make all determinations, calculations and adjustments required pursuant to this Confirmation in good faith and on a commercially reasonable basis.
Calculation Agent City: New York
Initial Price: In relation to any Reference Obligation (and the related Transaction), the Initial Price specified in Annex I.  The Initial Price (a) will initially be as specified by Counterparty in its notice to Citibank on the Obligation Trade Date, (b) will be determined exclusive of accrued interest and (c) will be expressed as a percentage of the Reference Amount.  The Initial
  Page 7
 

 

Price will be determined exclusive of Costs of Assignment that would be incurred by a buyer in connection with any purchase of the Reference Obligation and exclusive of any Delay Compensation.
   
Payments by Counterparty  
Counterparty First Floating Amounts:  
First Floating Amount Payer: Counterparty
First Floating Amount:

In relation to any First Floating Rate Payer Payment Date, the sum, for each Transaction, of the products of (a) the First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Amount for such Transaction for the related First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period multiplied by (b) the Floating Rate Option for such Transaction during the related First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period plus the Spread multiplied by (c) the Floating Rate Day Count Fraction; provided that, for purposes of the foregoing calculation, the percentage specified in the foregoing clause (b) shall be the Spread (and not the Floating Rate Option plus the Spread) with respect to any portion of a First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Amount constituting the undrawn stated face amount of all letters of credit, bankers' acceptances and other similar instruments issued in respect of a related Committed Obligation.

 

If the Floating Rate Option or the Spread in relation to any Transaction varies during any First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period, then the Floating Rate Option or the Spread, as the case may be, for such Calculation Period shall be equal to (a) the sum, for each day during such Calculation Period, of the products of the Notional Funded Amount of such Transaction for such day multiplied by the Floating Rate Option or the Spread, as the case may be, in effect on such day divided by (b) the sum of the Notional Funded Amount of such Transaction on each day during such Calculation Period.

 

First Floating Rate Payer

Calculation Amount:

 

In relation to any First Floating Rate Payer Payment Date and any Transaction, the daily average of the Notional Funded Amount of such Transaction during the related First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period.
First Floating Rate Payer In relation to any Transaction, each period from and
  Page 8
 

 

Calculation Period:

 

including any date upon which a payment of interest is scheduled or otherwise required to be made on the related Reference Obligation to but excluding the next such date, except that (a) the initial First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period will commence on, and include, the related Obligation Settlement Date and (b) the final First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period will end on, but exclude, the related Obligation Termination Date.

First Floating Rate

Payer Payment Date:

 

(a) In relation to any Transaction (other than with respect to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation), the fifth Business Day following the last day of any Monthly Period during which any payment of interest is scheduled or otherwise required to be made on the related Reference Obligation, commencing with the first such date after the Obligation Settlement Date for such Transaction and ending with the last such date occurring prior to the related Obligation Termination Date; and

 

(b) In relation to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, the related Total Return Payment Date.

Floating Rate Option: In relation to any Transaction, the floating rate index specified in the term loan agreement, revolving loan agreement or other similar credit agreement governing the related Reference Obligation (the " Reference Obligation Credit Agreement ") that is used to determine the rate of interest payable on such Reference Obligation; provided that (a) if more than one interest rate setting is at any time used to determine the rate of interest payable on a Reference Obligation ( i.e. , an interest rate election for a specific interest period relating to such Reference Obligation), then a separate First Floating Amount shall be calculated for each portion of such Reference Obligation as to which a separate interest rate setting has been effected, (b) any interest that has accrued to a specified date but is permitted under the Reference Obligation Credit Agreement to be capitalized or deferred as of such date (without default) shall be deemed to be scheduled to be paid on such date, (c) any Reference Obligation Credit Agreement that provides for the payment of interest less frequently than quarterly will be deemed to provide for a scheduled quarterly payment of interest on each date specified by Citibank, which date so specified shall be the calendar day of the month corresponding to other payment dates applicable to the related Reference
  Page 9
 

 

Obligation and (d) notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) if the floating rate index for such Reference Obligation (or any portion thereof) is the prime or base rate or is a fixed rate (or is otherwise not a rate determined on the basis of rates at which deposits in USD are offered to prime banks in the London interbank market), then the Floating Rate Option for such Reference Obligation (or such portion) shall equal USD-LIBOR-BBA and (ii) if the floating rate index for such Reference Obligation (or any portion thereof) is subject to the payment of a specified minimum rate regardless of the level of the relevant floating rate index, then the Floating Rate Option will be determined without regard to such specified minimum rate.
Designated Maturity: In relation to any Transaction and the related Reference Obligation, the Floating Rate Option will have a Designated Maturity and Reset Dates that correspond to the maturity and reset dates specified in the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement, except that, if the floating rate index specified in the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement that is used to determine the rate of interest payable on the Reference Obligation (or any portion thereof) is the prime or base rate or is a fixed rate (or is otherwise not a rate determined on the basis of rates at which deposits in USD are offered to prime banks in the London interbank market), then for purposes of determining USD-LIBOR-BBA the "Designated Maturity" shall be one month and the first day of each First Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period will be a Reset Date.
Spread: 1.20%
  Page 10
 

 

Floating Rate Day

Count Fraction:

 

In relation to any Transaction, the Floating Rate Day Count Fraction will be the day count basis for the computation of interest specified in the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement, except that, if the floating rate index specified in the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement that is used to determine the rate of interest payable on the Reference Obligation (or any portion thereof) is the prime or base rate or is a fixed rate (or is otherwise not a rate determined on the basis of rates at which deposits in USD are offered to prime banks in the London interbank market), then the Floating Rate Day Count Fraction will be Actual/360.
Reset Dates: As set forth in "Designated Maturity" above
Compounding: Inapplicable
   
Counterparty Second Floating Amounts:  
Second Floating Amount Payer: Counterparty
Second Floating Amount: In relation to any Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date, the product of (a) the Second Floating Rate Payer Calculation Amount for the related Second Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period multiplied by (b) the Spread multiplied by (c) the Floating Rate Day Count Fraction; provided that no Second Floating Amount shall be payable following the designation of an Early Termination Date by Counterparty as a result of the occurrence of an Event of Default under Section 5(a)(i) or 5(a)(vii) with respect to Citibank as Defaulting Party.

Second Floating Rate Payer

Calculation Amount:

 

In relation to any Second Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period, the excess, if any, of (a)  the Minimum Portfolio Notional Amount over (b) the Utilization Amount for such Second Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period.

Second Floating Rate Payer

Calculation Period:

 

Each Monthly Period; provided that (a) the initial Second Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period shall begin on the last day of the Ramp-Up Period and (b) the final Second Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period shall end on the last Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date.
Second Floating Rate The fifth Business Day following the last day of each Monthly Period; provided that (a) the initial Second
  Page 11
 

 

Payer Payment Dates:

 

Floating Rate Payer Payment Date will be the first such Business Day after the last day of the Ramp-Up Period and (b) the final Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date will be the Scheduled Termination Date (whether or not the Termination Date occurs prior to the final Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date).
Spread: 1.20%
Floating Rate Day Count Fraction: Actual/360.
Compounding: Inapplicable
   
Counterparty Third Floating Amount:  
Third Floating Amount Payer: Counterparty
Third Floating Amount: Each Expense or Other Payment.

Third Floating Rate

Payer Payment Dates:

 

In relation to any Transaction, (a) the fifth Business Day after the last day of each Monthly Period, beginning with the first such Business Day after the Obligation Settlement Date for such Transaction, (b) the related Obligation Termination Date and (c) after the related Obligation Termination Date, the fifth Business Day after notice of a Third Floating Amount from Citibank to Counterparty; provided that, prior to the fifth Business Day after the related Obligation Termination Date, if Counterparty has received less than five Business Days' notice from Citibank that such Third Floating Amount is due and payable, such Third Floating Rate Payer Payment Date shall be the fifth Business Day after the last day of the next succeeding Monthly Period.  The obligation of Counterparty to pay Third Floating Amounts in respect of any Transaction shall survive the related Obligation Termination Date.
   
Counterparty Fourth Floating Amounts:  
Fourth Floating Amount Payer: Counterparty
Fourth Floating Amount: In relation to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, Capital Depreciation, if any.
  Page 12
 

 

Fourth Floating Rate

Payer Payment Dates:

Each Total Return Payment Date.
   
Payments by Citibank:  
Citibank Fixed Amounts:  
Fixed Amount Payer: Citibank
Fixed Amount: In relation to any Transaction, the Interest and Fee Amount with respect to such Transaction for the related Fixed Amount Payer Payment Date.
Fixed Amount Payer Calculation Periods: In relation to each Reference Obligation in the Reference Portfolio, each period from and including any date upon which a payment of interest is made on such Reference Obligation to but excluding the next such date; provided that (a) the initial Fixed Amount Payer Calculation Period shall commence on and include the Obligation Settlement Date for such Reference Obligation and (b) the final Fixed Amount Payer Calculation Period shall end on, but exclude, the related Obligation Termination Date.
Fixed Amount Payer Payment Dates:

(a) In relation to any Transaction (other than with respect to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation), the fifth Business Day after the last day of any Monthly Period, commencing with the first such date after the Obligation Settlement Date for such Transaction and ending with the last such date occurring prior to the related Obligation Termination Date; and

 

(b) In relation to any Transaction with respect to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, the related Total Return Payment Date.

 

   
Citibank Floating Amounts:  
Floating Amount Payer: Citibank
Floating Amount: In relation to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, Capital Appreciation, if any.
Floating Rate Payer Payment Dates: Each Total Return Payment Date.
  Page 13
 

 

   

3. Reference Obligation Removal; Accelerated Termination.

 

Reference Obligation Removal

 

(a) A Transaction may be terminated in whole by either party (or in part by Counterparty) in accordance with this Clause 3 by the giving of notice (an " Accelerated Termination Notice ") to the other party (each such termination, an " Accelerated Termination ").

 

(i) Counterparty shall be entitled to terminate any Transaction or any portion thereof by delivering an Accelerated Termination Notice to Citibank that is given (i) on the proposed Termination Trade Date and (ii) no more than 30 days prior to the proposed Termination Settlement Date; provided that, except in the case of the termination of all Transactions, (x) the Portfolio Criteria set forth in Annex II would be satisfied on the proposed Termination Trade Date after giving effect to such termination and (y) the Net Collateral Value Percentage would be greater than or equal to the Termination Threshold (in each case, after giving effect to such termination). The Accelerated Termination Notice shall specify the Reference Obligation that is the subject of such Accelerated Termination, the amount of the Terminated Obligation, the proposed Termination Trade Date and the proposed Termination Settlement Date.

 

(ii) Following the occurrence of a Credit Event (as determined by the Calculation Agent) with respect to the related Reference Entity (including any guarantor or other obligor referred to in the definition thereof), Citibank shall, at any time after the Obligation Trade Date for the Reference Obligation, be entitled to propose, by notice to Counterparty, an increased Independent Amount Percentage with respect to the related Transaction. If Counterparty does not, by notice to Citibank within three Business Days after such notice from Citibank, agree to such increase, then Citibank may terminate the related Transaction by delivering an Accelerated Termination Notice to Counterparty that is given (i) on the Termination Trade Date and (ii) no less than 10 days prior to the proposed Termination Settlement Date. The Accelerated Termination Notice shall specify the Reference Obligation that is the subject of such Accelerated Termination, the amount of the Terminated Obligation, the Termination Trade Date and the Termination Settlement Date.

 

Elective Termination by Citibank due to Certain Events

 

(b) If:

 

(i) any Reference Obligation (including any Exchange Consideration) fails to satisfy the Obligation Criteria at any time,

 

(ii) the Portfolio Criteria are not satisfied at any time,

 

(iii) Counterparty fails to perform when due any obligation to Transfer Eligible Collateral under Clause 9(a), or

 

(iv) Counterparty fails to perform when due any obligation to Transfer Eligible Collateral under Clause 9(e) and such failure continues for one Business Day after notice of such failure is given to Counterparty,

 

then Citibank may notify Counterparty in writing of such event. In the case of the foregoing clause (i), if such event continues for 30 days following the delivery of such notice, then Citibank will have the right

 

  Page 14
 

but not the obligation to terminate the related Transaction. In the case of the foregoing clause (ii), if such event continues for 30 days following the delivery of such notice, then Citibank will have the right but not the obligation to terminate all (but not less than all) Transactions that are the subject of this Confirmation. In the case of the foregoing clause (ii), pending any action taken to correct or remedy non-compliance with one or both of clauses (iv) and (v) of the Portfolio Criteria (but without limiting Counterparty's obligation to remedy such non-compliance or Citibank's right under this Clause 3(b) to terminate the related Transaction), Citibank may in its sole discretion elect to treat all or any portion of the Transactions as Transactions relating to "Excess Concentration Obligations", in each case, to the extent such treatment would remedy such non-compliance. In the case of the foregoing clause (iii) or (iv), Citibank will have the immediate right but not the obligation to terminate all (but not less than all) Transactions that are the subject of this Confirmation. Citibank may exercise this termination right with respect to each Terminated Obligation by delivering an Accelerated Termination Notice to Counterparty that is given, as to any Terminated Obligation, (1) on the proposed Termination Trade Date and (2) no less than 10 days prior to the proposed Termination Settlement Date for the related Terminated Obligation. The Accelerated Termination Notice shall specify each Reference Obligation that is the subject of such Accelerated Termination and, with respect to each such Reference Obligation, the amount of the Terminated Obligation, the proposed Termination Trade Date and the proposed Termination Settlement Date.

 

Early Termination Date under Master Agreement

 

(c) If an Early Termination Date is designated under the Master Agreement, then (i) each Transaction will be terminated in its entirety, (ii) notwithstanding any contrary or otherwise inconsistent provision of the Master Agreement, the provisions set forth in Section 6(e) of the Master Agreement shall not apply to any Transaction (except that amounts that become due and payable on or prior to such Early Termination Date with respect to any Transaction as provided in this Confirmation will constitute Unpaid Amounts) and (iii) the Termination Trade Date for each Transaction will be the date specified by the Calculation Agent occurring on or promptly after such Early Termination Date; provided that, if such Early Termination Date is designated by reason of an Event of Default as to which Citibank is the Defaulting Party, Counterparty may specify the Termination Trade Date with respect to any Transaction as to which the Calculation Agent has not specified the Termination Trade Date within 10 days after such Early Termination Date. The Calculation Agent shall give notice (an " Accelerated Termination Notice ") to each party (such termination, an " Accelerated Termination ") on or prior to such Early Termination Date, which Accelerated Termination Notice shall specify each Reference Obligation that is the subject of such Accelerated Termination and, with respect to each such Reference Obligation, the amount of the Terminated Obligation, the proposed Termination Trade Date and the proposed Termination Settlement Date. The amount, if any, payable in respect of such Early Termination Date will be determined in accordance with Clause 4(a) or 4(b) of this Confirmation (as applicable) based upon the delivery of such Accelerated Termination Notice.

 

Effect of Termination

 

(d) With respect to any Transaction terminated in whole pursuant to this Clause 3, (i) as of the relevant Termination Trade Date the Reference Amount shall, for all purposes hereof other than calculating Rate Payments, be reduced to zero (and, in the case of a Committed Obligation, the Outstanding Principal Amount thereof shall be reduced to zero) and (ii) as of the relevant Termination Settlement Date the Reference Amount, for purposes of calculating Rate Payments, shall be reduced to zero (and, in the case of a Committed Obligation, the Outstanding Principal Amount thereof shall be reduced to zero). With respect to any Transaction terminated in part pursuant to this Clause 3, (i) as of the relevant Termination Trade Date the Reference Amount shall, for all purposes hereof other than calculating Rate Payments, be reduced by the amount of the reduction of the Reference Amount specified

 

  Page 15
 

in the Accelerated Termination Notice (and, in the case of a Committed Obligation, the Outstanding Principal Amount shall be reduced by an amount equal to the product of the Outstanding Principal Amount in effect immediately prior to such reduction multiplied by the amount of the reduction of the Reference Amount divided by the Reference Amount in effect immediately prior to such reduction) and (ii) as of the relevant Termination Settlement Date the Reference Amount shall, for purposes of calculating Rate Payments, be reduced by the amount of the reduction of the Reference Amount specified in the Accelerated Termination Notice (and, in the case of a Committed Obligation, the Outstanding Principal Amount shall be reduced by an amount equal to the product of the Outstanding Principal Amount in effect immediately prior to such reduction multiplied by the amount of the reduction of the Reference Amount divided by the Reference Amount in effect immediately prior to such reduction). Following any Termination Trade Date (other than the Termination Trade Date in respect of the Termination Date), Citibank shall promptly prepare and deliver to Counterparty a revised Annex I.

 

Citibank Call Date

 

(e) Citibank will have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate any Transaction that is the subject of this Confirmation or any portion thereof; provided that (i) no such termination shall have a Termination Trade Date that occurs prior to the date occurring 30 days prior to July 13, 2015 (the " Citibank Call Date ") or on a day other than a Business Day and (ii) any such termination shall be effected by Citibank giving notice to Counterparty on a Business Day occurring no less than 30 days prior to the proposed Termination Trade Date, which notice, in each case, shall specify the proposed Termination Trade Date. If Citibank does not exercise its right pursuant to this Clause 3(e) to terminate a Transaction with a Termination Trade Date occurring on the date 30 days prior to the Citibank Call Date, then Citibank will thereafter have the right, but not the obligation, to propose, by notice to Counterparty no fewer than 10 Business Days prior to the date on which such proposal is to be effective, to amend and restate one or more material terms of such Transaction, including, without limitation, the Spread, the Independent Amount Percentage and the application of the Obligation Criteria and Portfolio Criteria, with effect no earlier than the Citibank Call Date. If Citibank provides a notice to Counterparty proposing to amend and restate one or more material terms of a Transaction as provided above and Counterparty does not agree in writing to such amended and restated terms within 10 Business Days after Citibank provides such notice to Counterparty, each Transaction shall terminate, and the Termination Trade Date shall be such tenth Business Day. Even if a Termination Trade Date has been designated with respect to a Transaction or portion thereof pursuant to this Clause 3(e), such designation will not prevent Citibank or Counterparty from subsequently designating an earlier Termination Trade Date to the extent Citibank or Counterparty, as the case may be, is entitled to designate such earlier Termination Trade Date pursuant to this Confirmation. Notwithstanding anything in this Confirmation to the contrary:

 

(i) if Citibank elects to exercise its termination right under this Clause 3(e) with respect to all Transactions that are then the subject of this Confirmation, then each reference to the term "Scheduled Termination Date" in Clauses 4 (other than Clause 4(c)) and 5 and in the definitions of "Ramp-Down Period" and "Termination Trade Date" will instead be a reference to the date occurring 30 days after the Termination Trade Date specified in such notice from Citibank; and

 

(ii) whether or not Citibank elects to exercise its termination right under this Clause 3(e), each reference to the term "Scheduled Termination Date" in the definition of "Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date" (and in the provisions of Clause 4(c) dealing with the payment of the discounted present value of Second Floating Amounts) will be a reference to the Citibank Call Date.

 

  Page 16
 

4. Final Price Determination

 

Following the termination of any Transaction in whole or in part pursuant to Clause 3 or by reason of the occurrence of the Scheduled Termination Date (other than in connection with a Repayment), the Final Price for the relevant Terminated Obligation will be determined in accordance with this Clause 4.

 

Determination by Counterparty

 

(a) In order to determine the Final Price in relation to any Terminated Obligation then held by or on behalf of Citibank as a hedge for the related Transaction, Counterparty may arrange for the sale of such Terminated Obligation by giving notice of such sale to Citibank; provided that Counterparty shall have no right to arrange a sale of a Terminated Obligation pursuant to this Clause 4(a) in connection with the termination of a Transaction: (i) in the case of a termination pursuant to Clause 3(b); (ii) in the case of a termination pursuant to Clause 3(c) if the related Early Termination Date by reason of an Event of Default or Credit Event Upon Merger as to which Counterparty is the Defaulting Party or Affected Party; or (iii) if, as a result of such termination and the termination of all other Transactions as to which the Total Return Payment Date has not yet occurred, (x) the aggregate Value (as defined in the Credit Support Annex) of all Posted Credit Support (as so defined) held by Citibank as Secured Party (as so defined) plus the aggregate of all Citibank Floating Amounts payable in connection with such terminations would be less than (y) the aggregate of all Counterparty Fourth Floating Amounts payable in connection with such terminations. Such notice must be given at least three Business Days prior to the related Termination Settlement Date in the case of any Terminated Obligation and at least 30 days prior to the Scheduled Termination Date if all Transactions are to be terminated in connection with the Scheduled Termination Date. Any sale (i) must be to (x) an Approved Buyer or (y) another buyer approved in advance of the Termination Trade Date by Citibank, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, and (ii) must be scheduled to occur no later than the date customary for settlement, substantially in accordance with the then-current market practice in the principal market for such Terminated Obligation (as determined by the Calculation Agent), following the Termination Trade Date and on or prior to the Scheduled Termination Date if all Transactions are to be terminated in connection with the Scheduled Termination Date. If Counterparty so arranges any sale, the net cash proceeds received from the sale of any Terminated Obligation, net of the related Costs of Assignment and adjusted by any Delay Compensation as provided in Clause 6(b), shall be the " Final Price " in relation to that Terminated Obligation.

 

Determination by Calculation Agent

 

(b) If the Final Price for any Terminated Obligation is not determined according to Clause 4(a), the Calculation Agent shall attempt to obtain Firm Bids for such Terminated Obligation with respect to the applicable Termination Trade Date from three or more Dealers. The Calculation Agent will give Counterparty notice of its intention to obtain Firm Bids pursuant to this Clause 4(b) (such notice to be given telephonically and via electronic mail) not later than three hours prior to the bid submission deadline specified below. By notice to Citibank not later than one hour after such notice from the Calculation Agent, Counterparty may, but shall not be obligated to, designate a Dealer of credit standing acceptable to Citibank in the exercise of its reasonable discretion to provide a Firm Bid (and the Calculation Agent will seek a Firm Bid from such Dealer if so designated by Counterparty on a timely basis). A " Firm Bid " shall be a good and irrevocable bid for value, to purchase all or a portion of the applicable Terminated Obligation, expressed as a percentage of the Outstanding Principal Amount and exclusive of accrued interest, for scheduled settlement substantially in accordance with the then-current market practice in the principal market for such Terminated Obligation, as determined by the Calculation Agent, submitted by a Dealer as of 11 a.m. New York time or as soon as practicable thereafter. If there is more than one Terminated Obligation at any time, then the Calculation Agent may in its sole discretion

 

  Page 17
 

obtain Firm Bids with respect each separate Terminated Obligation or any group or groups of such Terminated Obligations. Citibank may, but is not obligated to, sell or cause the sale of any portion of any Terminated Obligation to any Dealer that provides a Firm Bid.

 

If the Calculation Agent is unable to obtain from Dealers at least one Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids for all of the Reference Amount of any Terminated Obligation with respect to the relevant Termination Trade Date, the Calculation Agent will attempt to obtain a Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids for all of the Reference Amount of such Terminated Obligation from three or more Dealers until the earlier of (i) the second Business Day (inclusive) following such Termination Trade Date and (ii) the date a Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids is obtained for all of the Reference Amount of such Terminated Obligation.

 

If the Calculation Agent is able to obtain at least one Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids for all of the Reference Amount of any Terminated Obligation, the Final Price for such Terminated Obligation shall be determined by reference to such Firm Bid or Firm Bids. If no Firm Bids are obtained on or before such second Business Day for all or a portion of the applicable Terminated Obligation, the Final Price shall be deemed to be zero with respect to such Terminated Obligation (or portion thereof) for which no Firm Bid was obtained. The Calculation Agent will conduct the bid process in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Clause 4(b) and otherwise in a commercially reasonable manner.

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein,

 

(i) the Calculation Agent shall be entitled to disregard any Firm Bid submitted by a Dealer if, in the Calculation Agent's commercially reasonable judgment, (x) such Dealer may be ineligible to accept assignment or transfer of the related Terminated Obligation or portion thereof, as applicable, substantially in accordance with the then-current market practice in the principal market for the Terminated Obligation, as determined by the Calculation Agent, or (y) such Dealer would not, through the exercise of its commercially reasonable efforts, be able to obtain any consent required under any agreement or instrument governing or otherwise relating to the related Terminated Obligation to the assignment or transfer of the related Terminated Obligation or portion thereof, as applicable, to it; and

 

(ii) if the Calculation Agent determines that the highest Firm Bid obtained in connection with any Termination Trade Date is not bona fide as a result of (x) the occurrence of an Event of Default described in Section 5(a)(vii) with respect to the bidder, (y) the inability, failure or refusal of the bidder to settle the purchase of the related Terminated Obligation or portion thereof, as applicable, or otherwise settle transactions in the relevant market or perform its obligations generally or (z) the Calculation Agent not having pre-approved trading lines with the bidder that would permit settlement of the purchase of the related Terminated Obligation or portion thereof, as applicable,

 

that Firm Bid shall be disregarded and the Calculation Agent shall designate a new Termination Trade Date; provided that the Calculation Agent shall designate a new Termination Trade Date pursuant to this paragraph only once. If the only Firm Bid for any portion of the related Terminated Obligation determined in connection with the second Termination Trade Date is disregarded pursuant to this paragraph, the Calculation Agent shall have no obligation to obtain further bids, and the applicable " Final Price " for the portion which was so disregarded shall be deemed to be zero. If one or more Firm Bids remains after disregarding any Firm Bid for any portion of the related Terminated Obligation determined in connection with the second Termination Trade Date pursuant to this paragraph, the Calculation Agent shall determine the Final Price for the Terminated Obligation by reference to such remaining Firm Bid or Firm Bids.

 

  Page 18
 

If Citibank transfers, or causes the transfer of, the Terminated Obligation to the Dealer or Dealers providing the highest Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids, the net cash proceeds received from the sale of such Terminated Obligation (which sale shall be scheduled to settle substantially in accordance with the then-current market practice in the principal market for the related Reference Obligation as determined by the Calculation Agent), net of the related Costs of Assignment and adjusted by any Delay Compensation as provided in Clause 6(b), shall be the " Final Price " for that Terminated Obligation (or the portion thereof that is sold).

 

If Citibank determines, in its sole discretion, not to sell or cause the sale of any portion of any Terminated Obligation to the entity or entities providing the highest Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids, the " Final Price " for such unsold portion shall be equal to the greater of (a) zero and (b) the sum of (i) the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Terminated Obligation as of the Termination Trade Date multiplied by the highest Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids for all of the Reference Amount of such Terminated Obligation minus (ii) the product of (x) the excess, if any, of the Commitment Amount of such Terminated Obligation as of the Termination Trade Date over the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Terminated Obligation as of the Termination Trade Date multiplied by (y) 100% minus the highest Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids for all of the Reference Amount of such Terminated Obligation. The Calculation Agent may perform any of its duties under this Clause 4(b) through any Affiliate designated by it, but no such designation shall relieve the Calculation Agent of its duties under this Clause 4(b).

 

Other than in the case of a termination pursuant to Clause 3(c), Citibank and Counterparty will make commercially reasonable efforts to accomplish the assignment to Counterparty (free of payment by Counterparty) of any Terminated Obligation or portion thereof held by or on behalf of Citibank as a hedge for the related Transaction for which the Final Price is deemed to be zero as provided in this Clause 4(b); provided that Citibank shall not be liable for any losses related to any delay in or failure of such assignment beyond its control.

 

The Calculation Agent will, with respect to each Terminated Obligation, provide to each party a statement showing, in reasonable detail, the calculation of the Final Price for such Terminated Obligation determined pursuant to this Clause 4(b) (including the identity of all Firm Bids obtained in connection with such calculation).

 

(c) For the avoidance of doubt, if the Termination Date occurs prior to the Scheduled Termination Date (other than by reason of the designation of an Early Termination Date by Counterparty as a result of the occurrence of an Event of Default under Section 5(a)(i) or 5(a)(vii) with respect to Citibank as Defaulting Party), each Counterparty Second Floating Amount shall continue to be payable by Counterparty on each subsequent Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date occurring on or prior to the Scheduled Termination Date; provided that, if either party shall so specify in writing to the other party prior to any final Termination Trade Date, then on such final Termination Trade Date (i) the obligation of Counterparty to continue to pay each Counterparty Second Floating Amount on each subsequent Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date occurring on or prior to the Scheduled Termination Date shall terminate and be replaced by the obligation in the following clause and (ii) Counterparty shall pay to Citibank an amount equal to the present value (as calculated by the Calculation Agent with discounting on a continuous basis) of each Counterparty Second Floating Amount payable (without regard to the termination of such obligation under the foregoing clause) on each subsequent Second Floating Rate Payer Payment Date occurring on or prior to the Scheduled Termination Date, discounted to such final Termination Trade Date at a discount rate per annum equal to the Discount Rate. For this purpose, the " Discount Rate " means the zero coupon swap rate (as determined by the Calculation Agent) implied by the fixed rate offered to be paid by Citibank under a fixed for floating interest rate swap transaction with a

 

  Page 19
 

remaining Term equal to the period from such final Termination Trade Date to the Scheduled Termination Date in exchange for the receipt of payments indexed to USD-LIBOR-BBA.

 

5. Repayment.

 

If all or a portion of the Reference Amount of any Reference Obligation is repaid or otherwise reduced (in the case of a Committed Obligation, only if the Reference Amount thereof is permanently reduced) (including, without limitation, through any exercise of any right of set-off, reduction, or counterclaim that results in the satisfaction of the obligations of such Reference Entity to pay any principal owing in respect of such Reference Obligation) on or prior to the Scheduled Termination Date (the amount of such repayment or other reduction, a " Repayment "; the portion of the related Reference Obligation so repaid or otherwise reduced, a " Repaid Obligation "; and the date of such Repayment, the " Repayment Date "):

 

(a) the Total Return Payment Date with respect to the Repaid Obligation will be the fifth Business Day next succeeding the last day of the Monthly Period in which the Repayment Date occurred;

 

(b) as of the related Repayment Date, the Reference Amount of such Reference Obligation shall be decreased by an amount equal to the principal amount of the Repaid Obligation; and

 

(c) the related Final Price of the Repaid Obligation shall be (i) in the case of a Committed Obligation, the portion of the Reference Amount that is permanently reduced on such Repayment Date and (ii) in the case of a Term Obligation, the amount of principal and premium in respect of principal paid by such Reference Entity on the Repaid Obligation to holders thereof on such Repayment Date. Following any Repayment Date, Citibank shall prepare and deliver to Counterparty a revised Annex I showing the revised Reference Amount for the related Reference Obligation.

 

6. Adjustments.

 

(a) If any Reference Obligation or any portion thereof is irreversibly converted or exchanged into or for any securities, obligations, cash or other assets or property (" Exchange Consideration "), thereafter such Exchange Consideration will constitute such Reference Obligation or portion thereof, and the Calculation Agent shall in good faith adjust the terms of any Transaction relating to such Reference Obligation as the Calculation Agent determines appropriate to preserve the theoretical value of such Transaction to the parties immediately prior to such exchange or, if such exchange results in a change in value, the proportionate post-exchange value, and determine the effective date of such adjustments. Any such adjustment of the terms of any Transaction relating to such Reference Obligation made by the Calculation Agent shall be consistent with any comparable adjustments made in relation to the related conversion or exchange into or for such Exchange Consideration by any authority or association that is generally recognized by nationally recognized dealers in bank loans as having power or authority to make binding determinations with respect to such adjustments.

 

(b) Delay Compensation (as defined below) shall result in an adjustment (i) as contemplated by the definition of "Interest and Fee Amount" in connection with the establishment by the Citibank Holder of a related hedge in respect of a Transaction, if the actual settlement of the purchase of the related hedge occurs after the date scheduled for the settlement of such purchase and (ii) of a Final Price with respect to a Terminated Obligation in connection with the termination by the Citibank Holder of a related hedge, if the actual settlement of the sale of the related hedge occurs after the date scheduled for the settlement of such sale; provided that Delay Compensation shall be payable in connection with any such termination only to the extent the related Final Price does not already reflect such adjustment for Delay Compensation. " Delay Compensation " shall accrue (x) in the case of clause (i) above, from and including the date scheduled for the settlement of the purchase effected to establish the related hedge to

 

  Page 20
 

but excluding the actual settlement of such purchase (and, during such period, (A) the Counterparty First Floating Amount shall be calculated by reference to the Spread and not the Floating Rate Option and (B) Interest and Fee Amounts will be determined without regard to payments in respect of the interest rate index used in the Reference Obligation Credit Agreement to calculate interest payments in respect of the related Reference Obligation and in effect during such period) and (y) in the case of clause (ii) above, from and including the date scheduled for the sale effected to terminate the related hedge to but excluding the actual settlement of such sale (and, during such period, (A) the Counterparty First Floating Amount shall be calculated by reference to the Floating Rate Option and not the Spread and (B) Interest and Fee Amounts shall be reduced by interest accrued during such period in excess of the interest rate index used in the Reference Obligation Credit Agreement to calculate interest payments in respect of the related Reference Obligation and in effect during such period). In connection with any adjustment by reason of Delay Compensation, (i) any initial Payment Date in this Confirmation determined by reference to the "Obligation Settlement Date" shall be determined as if the Obligation Settlement Date were the actual settlement of the purchase of the related hedge and (ii) any final Payment Date in this Confirmation determined by reference to the "Termination Settlement Date" shall be determined as if the Termination Settlement Date were the actual settlement of the termination of the related hedge. If Citibank elects to establish a hedge as a result of the addition or increase in the Reference Amount of any Reference Obligation that is the subject of a Transaction, or to sell or cause the sale of any portion of any Terminated Obligation in order to determine the Final Price thereof as contemplated by Clause 4(b), then Citibank will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the related purchase or sale to occur on the related Obligation Settlement Date or Termination Settlement Date, as the case may be.

 

(c) If (i) Citibank elects to establish a hedge as a result of the addition or increase in the Reference Amount of any Reference Obligation that is the subject of a Transaction and (ii) the Citibank Holder is unable after using commercially reasonable efforts to effect the settlement of such hedge, then, by notice to Counterparty, Citibank may in its sole discretion, specify that such addition or increase in the Reference Amount of such Reference Obligation will not be effective .

 

7. Representations, Warranties and Agreements.

 

(a)            Each party hereby agrees as follows, so long as either party has or may have any obligation under any Transaction:

 

(i) Non-Reliance . It is acting for its own account, and it has made its own independent decisions to enter into such Transaction and as to whether such Transaction is appropriate or proper for it based upon its own judgment and upon advice from such advisors as it has deemed necessary. It is not relying on any communication (written or oral) of the other party as investment advice or as a recommendation to enter into such Transaction; it being understood that information and explanations related to the terms and conditions of such Transaction shall not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to enter into such Transaction. It has not received from the other party any assurance or guarantee as to the expected results of such Transaction;

 

(ii) Evaluation and Understanding . It is capable of evaluating and understanding (on its own behalf or through independent professional advice), and understands and accepts, the terms, conditions and risks of such Transaction. It is also capable of assuming, and assumes, the financial and other risks of such Transaction;

 

(iii) Status of Parties . The other party is not acting as a fiduciary or an advisor for it in respect of such Transaction; and

 

  Page 21
 
(iv) Reliance on its Own Advisors . Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in making its decision to enter into, and thereafter to maintain, administer or terminate, such Transaction, it will not rely on any communication from the other party as, and it has not received any representation or other communication from the other party constituting, legal, accounting, business or tax advice, and it will consult its own legal, accounting, business and tax advisors concerning the consequences of such Transaction.

 

(b)            Each party acknowledges and agrees that, so long as either party has or may have any obligation under any Transaction:

 

(i) such Transaction does not create any direct or indirect obligation of any Reference Entity or any direct or indirect participation in any Reference Obligation or any other obligation of any Reference Entity;

 

(ii) each party and its Affiliates may deal in any Reference Obligation and may accept deposits from, make loans or otherwise extend credit to, and generally engage in any kind of commercial or investment banking or other business with any Reference Entity, any Affiliate of any Reference Entity, any other person or entity having obligations relating to any Reference Entity and may act with respect to such business in the same manner as if such Transaction did not exist and may originate, purchase, sell, hold or trade, and may exercise consensual or remedial rights in respect of, obligations, securities or other financial instruments of, issued by or linked to any Reference Entity, regardless of whether any such action might have an adverse effect on such Reference Entity, the value of the related Reference Obligation or the position of the other party to such Transaction or otherwise;

 

(iii) except as provided in Clause 7(d)(iv), each party and its Affiliates and the Calculation Agent may, whether by virtue of the types of relationships described herein or otherwise, at the date hereof or at any time hereafter, be in possession of information regarding any Reference Entity or any Affiliate of any Reference Entity that is or may be material in the context of such Transaction and that may or may not be publicly available or known to the other party. In addition, except as provided in Clause 7(b)(vii), this Confirmation does not create any obligation on the part of such party and its Affiliates to disclose to the other party any such relationship or information (whether or not confidential);

 

(iv) neither Citibank nor any of its Affiliates shall be under any obligation to hedge such Transaction or to own or hold any Reference Obligation as a result of such Transaction, and Citibank and its Affiliates may establish, maintain, modify, terminate or re-establish any hedge position or any methodology for hedging at any time without regard to Counterparty. Counterparty acknowledges and agrees that it is not relying on any representation, warranty or statement by Citibank or any of its Affiliates as to whether, at what times, in what manner or by what method Citibank or any of its Affiliates may engage in any hedging activities;

 

(v) notwithstanding any other provision in this Confirmation or any other document, Citibank and Counterparty (and each employee, representative, or other agent of Citibank or Counterparty) may each disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind, the U.S. tax treatment and U.S. tax structure of the transaction and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to them relating to such U.S. tax treatment and U.S. tax structure (as those terms are used in Treasury Regulations under Sections 6011, 6111 and 6112 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the " Code ")), other than any information for which nondisclosure is reasonably necessary in order to comply with applicable securities laws. To the extent not inconsistent with the previous sentence, Citibank and Counterparty will each keep

 

  Page 22
 

confidential (except as required by law) all information unless the other party has consented in writing to the disclosure of such information;

 

(vi) if Citibank chooses to hold a Reference Obligation as a result of any Transaction, Citibank shall hold such Reference Obligation directly or through an Affiliate (the " Citibank Holder "). The Citibank Holder may deal with such Reference Obligation as if the related Transaction did not exist, provided that, so long as the Citibank Holder remains the lender of record with respect to such Reference Obligation, upon any occasion permitting the Citibank Holder to exercise any right in relation to such Reference Obligation to give or withhold consent (an " Election ") to an action proposed to be taken (or to be refrained from being taken), the Citibank Holder shall, insofar as permitted under (x) applicable laws, rules and regulations and (y) each provision of any agreement or instrument evidencing or governing such Reference Obligation (and, in the case of any participation interest, governing such participation interest), give its consent to the action proposed to be taken (or to be refrained from being taken), unless (A) Counterparty, by timely notice to Citibank, requests (a " Counterparty Election Request ") that the Citibank Holder withhold such consent and (B) the Citibank Holder, in its sole discretion, elects to withhold such consent in accordance with the Counterparty Election Request. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (1) the Citibank Holder shall have no obligation to respond to, or consult with Counterparty in relation to, a Counterparty Election Request (failure to respond to a Counterparty Election Request being deemed a denial); (2) the Citibank Holder shall have no other duties or obligations to Counterparty of any nature with respect to any Election or any Counterparty Election Request; (3) the Citibank Holder shall not be liable to Counterparty or any of its Affiliates for the consequences of any consent given or withheld by the Citibank Holder in connection with such Reference Obligation (whether or not pursuant to a Counterparty Election Request); and (4) if the Citibank Holder elects in its sole discretion to withhold its consent in accordance with a Counterparty Election Request, the Citibank Holder may subsequently determine to give such consent at any time without notice to Counterparty; and

 

(vii) in connection with each Reference Obligation that is held by a Citibank Holder as a result of any Transaction, the Citibank Holder will promptly (and in any event within one Business Day after receipt) deliver or cause to be delivered to Counterparty the following information and documentation, in each case, to the extent actually received by the Citibank Holder from the Reference Entity or its agents under the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement: all notices of any borrowings, prepayments and interest rate settings, all amendments, waivers and other modifications (whether final or proposed) in relation to the terms of the Reference Obligation; and all notices given by the Reference Entity to the lenders or their agent or by the lenders or their agent to the Reference Entity in relation to the exercise of remedies.

 

(c)            Each of the parties hereby represents that, on each date on which a Transaction is entered into hereunder:

 

(i) it is entering into such Transaction for investment, financial intermediation, hedging or other commercial purposes; and

 

(ii) (x) it is an "eligible contract participant" as defined in Section 1a of the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the " CEA "), (y) the Master Agreement and each Transaction are subject to individual negotiation by each party, and (z) neither the Master Agreement nor any Transaction will be executed or traded on a "trading facility" within the meaning of Section 1a of the CEA.

 

  Page 23
 

(d)            Counterparty hereby represents to Citibank that:

 

(i) its financial condition is such that it has no need for liquidity with respect to its investment in any Transaction and no need to dispose of any portion thereof to satisfy any existing or contemplated undertaking or indebtedness. Its investments in and liabilities in respect of any Transaction, which it understands is not readily marketable, is not disproportionate to its net worth, and it is able to bear any loss in connection with any Transaction, including the loss of its entire investment in such Transaction;

 

(ii) it understands no obligations of Citibank to it hereunder will be entitled to the benefit of deposit insurance (except for any deposit insurance that may apply to Posted Collateral) and that such obligations will not be guaranteed by any Affiliate of Citibank or any governmental agency;

 

(iii) it is not an Affiliate of any Reference Entity;

 

(iv) as of (x) the relevant Obligation Trade Date and (y) any date on which a sale is effected pursuant to Clause 4(a) or on which the Calculation Agent solicits Firm Bids pursuant to Clause 4(b), neither Counterparty nor any of its Affiliates, whether by virtue of the types of relationships described herein or otherwise, is on such date in possession of information regarding any related Reference Entity or any Affiliate of such Reference Entity that is or may be material in the context of such Transaction or the purchase or sale of any related Reference Obligation unless such information either (x) is publicly available or (y) has been made available to each registered owner of such Reference Obligation on a basis that permits such registered owner to disclose such information to any assignee of or participant (whether on a funded or unfunded basis) in, or any prospective assignee of or participant (whether on a funded or unfunded basis) in, any rights or obligations under the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement;

 

(v) it is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, and it is a disregarded entity of a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware for U.S. Federal income tax purposes (which representation shall also be made for purposes of Section 3(f) of the Master Agreement);

 

(vi) it has delivered to Citibank on or prior to the Trade Date (and it will, prior to any expiration of any such form previously so delivered, deliver to Citibank) a United States Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 (or applicable successor form), properly completed and signed;

 

(vii) it could have received all payments on the Reference Obligation without U.S. Federal or foreign withholding tax if it owned the Reference Obligation (which representation shall also be made for purposes of Section 3(f) of the Master Agreement); and

 

(viii) it is not a tax-exempt organization for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

 

(e)            Except for disclosure authorized pursuant to Clause 7(b)(v), Counterparty agrees to be bound by the confidentiality provisions of the related Reference Obligation Credit Agreement with respect to all information and documentation in relation to a Reference Entity or a Reference Obligation delivered to Counterparty hereunder. Counterparty acknowledges that such information may include material non-public information concerning the Reference Entity or its securities and agrees to use such information in accordance with applicable law, including Federal and State securities laws.

 

  Page 24
 

(f)             Section 2(c)(ii) of the Master Agreement shall not apply to the Transactions to which this Confirmation relates. Multiple Transaction Payment Netting under Section 2(c) of the Master Agreement will apply to the Transactions to which this Confirmation relates.

 

(g)            Notwithstanding anything in the Master Agreement to the contrary, Citibank will not be required to pay any additional amount under Section 2(d)(i) of the Master Agreement in respect of any deduction or withholding for or on account of any Tax in relation to any payment under any Transaction that is determined by reference to interest or fees payable with respect to any Reference Obligation. If Citibank is required by any applicable law, as modified by the practice of any relevant governmental revenue authority, to make any deduction or withholding for or on account of any Tax in relation to any payment under any Transaction that is determined by reference to interest or fees payable with respect to any Reference Obligation and Citibank does not so deduct or withhold, then Section 2(d)(ii) of the Master Agreement shall be applicable.

 

8. Adjustments Relating to Certain Unpaid or Rescinded Payments.

 

(a)            If (i) Citibank makes any payment to Counterparty as provided under Clause 2 and the corresponding Interest and Fee Amount is not paid (in whole or in part) when due or (ii) any Interest and Fee Amount in respect of a Reference Obligation is required to be returned (in whole or in part) by a holder of such Reference Obligation (including, without limitation, the Citibank Holder) to the applicable Reference Entity or paid to any other person or entity or is otherwise rescinded pursuant to any bankruptcy or insolvency law or any other applicable law, then Counterparty will pay to Citibank, upon request by Citibank, such amount (or portion thereof) so not paid or so required to be returned, paid or otherwise rescinded. If such returned, paid or otherwise rescinded amount is subsequently paid, Citibank shall pay such amount (subject to Clause 8(c)) to Counterparty within five Business Days after the date of such subsequent payment.

 

(b)            If, with respect to any Repaid Obligation, the corresponding payment of principal of the Repaid Obligation is required to be returned (in whole or in part) by a holder thereof (including, without limitation, the Citibank Holder) to the applicable Reference Entity or paid to any other person or entity or is otherwise rescinded pursuant to any bankruptcy or insolvency law or any other applicable law, then (i) the parties hereto shall be restored severally and respectively to their former positions hereunder and thereafter all rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall continue as though no Repayment had occurred and (ii) without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if either party has made a payment to the other party in respect of Capital Appreciation or Capital Depreciation related to such Repayment as provided under Clause 2, then the party that received the payment in respect of such Capital Appreciation or Capital Depreciation, as applicable, shall repay such amount (subject to Clause 8(c)) to the other party. If such returned, paid or otherwise rescinded amount is subsequently paid by the related Reference Entity or any such other person or entity, then the relevant party shall pay the amount of such Capital Appreciation or Capital Depreciation, as applicable, within five Business Days after the date of such subsequent payment.

 

(c)            Amounts payable pursuant to this Clause 8 shall be subject to adjustment by the Calculation Agent in good faith and on a commercially reasonable basis, as agreed by Citibank and Counterparty, in order to preserve for the parties the intended economic risks and benefits of the relevant Transaction.

 

(d)            The payment obligations of Citibank and Counterparty pursuant to this Clause 8 shall survive the termination of all Transactions.

 

  Page 25
 

9. Credit Support.

 

Notwithstanding anything in the Credit Support Annex (the " Credit Support Annex ") to the Schedule to the Master Agreement to the contrary, the following collateral terms shall apply to each Transaction to which this Confirmation relates (capitalized terms used in this Clause 9 but not otherwise defined in this Confirmation have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Credit Support Annex):

 

(a) With respect to each Transaction to which this Confirmation relates, an "Independent Amount" shall be applicable to Counterparty on each date of determination in an amount in USD equal to the Notional Amount of such Transaction on such date of determination multiplied by the relevant Independent Amount Percentage (determined in accordance with the table set forth below).

 

Condition Independent Amount Percentage
(i) Except as provided in clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv)  below, with respect to any Transaction 25%
(ii) Except as provided in clause (iv) below, with respect to any Transaction relating to a Non-Standard Reference Obligation Such percentage as Citibank shall specify on or prior to the Obligation Trade Date for such Transaction
(iii) Except as provided in clause (iv) below, with respect to any Transaction relating to a Excess Concentration Obligation Such percentage as Citibank shall specify pursuant to Clause 3(b)
(iv) With respect to any Reference Obligation whose Independent Amount Percentage is agreed in writing as provided in Clause 3(a)(ii) Such Independent Amount Percentage as is agreed in writing as provided in Clause 3(a)(ii)

 

 

Not later than the close of business in New York City on (i) the Effective Date and (ii) the date of any increase in the Independent Amount Percentage applicable to any Transaction, Counterparty as Pledgor will Transfer to Citibank as Secured Party Eligible Collateral having a Value as of the date of Transfer equal to the related Independent Amount (or increase in the related Independent Amount) determined pursuant to this Clause 9(a).

 

(b) In no event shall Citibank as Secured Party be obligated to Transfer Posted Credit Support in respect of a Return Amount to Counterparty as Pledgor if the Value as of any Valuation Date of all Posted Credit Support held by Citibank as Secured Party would be less than the aggregate of all Independent Amounts determined pursuant to Clause 9(a).

 

(c) In no event shall Counterparty as a Secured Party have any positive "Exposure" to Citibank with respect to any Transaction to which this Confirmation relates.

 

(d) Without limiting Clause 3(b)(iv) or Clause 9(e), in no event shall Citibank as a Secured Party shall have any positive "Exposure" to Counterparty with respect to any Transaction to which this Confirmation relates.

 

  Page 26
 
(e) If (i) the Net Collateral Value Percentage on any Valuation Date is less than the Termination Threshold on such Valuation Date and (ii) Citibank gives notice thereof to Counterparty on any Business Day, Counterparty will, not later than the close of business on the Business Day following the date of such notice from Citibank, effect the Transfer to Citibank as Secured Party of Eligible Collateral such that the Net Collateral Value Percentage after giving effect to such Transfer is at least equal to the Cure Threshold. In addition, Counterparty may, on any Business Day, effect the Transfer to Citibank as Secured Party of any additional Eligible Collateral.

 

(f) If Counterparty enters into any Transaction under the Master Agreement other than the Transactions contemplated by this Confirmation (each, a " Separate Transaction "), then the Credit Support Amount with respect to Counterparty as Pledgor shall never be less than the "Credit Support Amount" with respect to Counterparty as Pledgor calculated (i) solely with reference to all Separate Transactions and (ii) without regard to the aggregate of all Independent Amounts applicable to Counterparty as Pledgor under this Confirmation.

 

(g) Each Business Day shall be a Valuation Date.

 

10. Notice and Account Details.

 

Notices to Citibank:
 

Citibank, N.A., New York Branch

390 Greenwich Street, 4th Floor

New York, New York 10013

Tel: (212) 723-6181

Fax: (646) 291-5779

Attn: Mitali Sohoni

 

with a copy to:

 

Office of the General Counsel

Fixed Income and Derivatives Sales and Trading

Citibank, N.A., New York Branch

388 Greenwich Street, 17th Floor

New York, New York 10013

Tel: (212) 816-2121

Fax: (646) 862-8431

Attn: Craig Seledee

 

Notices to Counterparty:
  As set forth in Part 4 of the Schedule to the Master Agreement
Payments to Citibank:
 

Citibank, N.A., New York

ABA No.: 021-000-089

Account No.: 00167679

Ref: Financial Futures

 

  Page 27
 

 

Payments to Counterparty:
  Any payment to be made by Citibank to Counterparty shall be subject to the condition that Citibank shall have received notice of the account to which such payment is to be made not less than three Local Business Days prior to the date of such payment.

 

 

11. Offices.

 

(a) The Office of Citibank for each Transaction:

 

New York

 

(b) The Office of Counterparty for each Transaction:

 

New York

  

  Page 28
 

Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms of our agreement by having a duly authorized officer of Counterparty execute this Confirmation and return the same by facsimile to the attention of the individual at Citibank indicated on the first page hereof.

 

Very truly yours,

 

CITIBANK, N.A.

 

 

 

By: /s/  David Santos
Name: David Santos

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

 

CONFIRMED AND AGREED
AS OF THE DATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:

 

405 TRS I, LLC

 

By: Business Development Corporation of America, its

sole member

 

By:  /s/ Nicholas Radesca
Name: Nicholas Radesca

Title: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

 

 

 

  Page 29
 

ANNEX A

 

ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS

 

" Affiliate ", for purposes of this Confirmation only, has the meaning given to such term in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

" Approved Buyer " means (a) any entity listed in Annex III (as such Annex may be amended by mutual written consent of the parties hereto from time to time) so long as its long-term unsecured and unsubordinated debt obligations on the "trade date" for the related purchase or submission of a Firm Bid contemplated hereby are rated at least "Baa1" by Moody's and at least "BBB+ " by S&P and (b) if an entity listed in Annex III is not the principal banking or securities Affiliate within a financial holding company group, the principal banking or securities Affiliate of such listed entity within such financial holding company group so long as such obligations of such Affiliate have the rating indicated in clause (a) above.

 

" Capital Appreciation " and " Capital Depreciation " mean, for any Total Return Payment Date, the amount determined according to the following formula for the applicable Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation:

 

Final Price – Applicable Notional Amount

 

where

 

" Final Price " means (a) in the case of any Terminated Obligation, the amount determined pursuant to Clause 4, and (b) in the case of any Repaid Obligation, the amount determined pursuant to Clause 5, and

 

" Applicable Notional Amount " means the Notional Funded Amount (determined immediately prior to the related Repayment Date or Termination Trade Date) for such Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, as applicable.

 

If such amount is positive, such amount is " Capital Appreciation " and if such amount is negative, the absolute value of such amount is " Capital Depreciation ".

 

" Committed Obligation " means (a) any Delayed Drawdown Reference Obligation and (b) any Revolving Reference Obligation.

 

" Costs of Assignment " means, in the case of any Terminated Obligation, the sum of (a) any actual costs of transfer or assignment paid by the seller under the terms of any Terminated Obligation or otherwise actually imposed on the seller by any applicable administrative agent, borrower or obligor incurred in connection with the sale of such Terminated Obligation and (b) any reasonable expenses incurred by the seller in connection with such sale and, if transfers of the Terminated Obligation are subject to the Standard Terms and Conditions for Distressed Trade Confirmations, as published by the LSTA and as in effect on the Obligation Trade Date, reasonable legal costs incurred by the seller in connection with such sale, in each case to the extent not already reflected in the Final Price.

 

" Credit Event " means the occurrence of a Bankruptcy or Failure to Pay. For purposes of the determination of whether a Credit Event has occurred, the Obligation Category will be Borrowed Money, the Payment Requirement will be USD1,000,000 and no Obligation Characteristics will be specified.

 

  Page 30
 

Capitalized terms used in this definition but not defined in this Confirmation shall have the meanings specified in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions.

 

" Cure Threshold " means, on any date of determination occurring from and including the Effective Date, a percentage equal to (a) the aggregate of all Independent Amounts under this Confirmation over (b) the Portfolio Notional Amount.

 

" Current Price " means, with respect to any Reference Obligation on any date of determination, the Calculation Agent's determination of the net cash proceeds that would be received from the sale on such date of determination of such Reference Obligation, net of the related Costs of Assignment. If Counterparty disputes the Calculation Agent's determination of the Current Price of any Reference Obligation, then Counterparty may, no later than three hours after Counterparty is given notice of such determination, designate two Dealers of credit standing acceptable to Citibank in the exercise of its reasonable discretion to provide a Firm Bid to Citibank within such three-hour period. The highest of such two Firm Bids will be the Current Price. The "Current Price" shall be expressed as a percentage of par and will be determined exclusive of accrued interest.

 

" Dealer " means (i) a nationally recognized independent dealer in the related Reference Obligation chosen by the Calculation Agent or its designated Affiliate (other than the Calculation Agent or any of its Affiliates), (ii) any Approved Buyer designated by Counterparty or (iii) any other entity (other than the Calculation Agent or any of its Affiliates) designated by the Calculation Agent or its designated Affiliate in its sole discretion as a "Dealer" for the purposes of this Confirmation.

 

" Delayed Drawdown Reference Obligation " means a Reference Obligation that (a) requires the holder thereof to make one or more future advances to the borrower under the instrument or agreement pursuant to which such Reference Obligation was issued or created, (b) specifies a maximum amount that can be borrowed on one or more fixed borrowing dates and (c) does not permit the re-borrowing of any amount previously repaid; provided that, on any date on which all commitments by the holder thereof to make advances to the borrower under such Delayed Drawdown Reference Obligation expire or are terminated or reduced to zero, such Reference Obligation shall cease to be a Delayed Drawdown Reference Obligation.

 

" Excess Concentration Obligation " means (a) any Reference Obligation whose inclusion in the Reference Portfolio (other than as an "Excess Concentration Obligation") would not on the related Obligation Trade Date satisfy one or more of clauses (iv) and (v) of the Portfolio Criteria (but only to the extent that such inclusion would not satisfy any such clause) and (b) any Reference Obligation deemed to be an Excess Concentration Obligation pursuant to Clause 3(b). Notwithstanding that the foregoing definition provides that only part of a Reference Obligation may be an "Excess Concentration Obligation" for all other purposes of this Confirmation, the entire Reference Obligation shall be deemed to be an "Excess Concentration Obligation" for purposes of determining pursuant to Clause 9(a) the Independent Amount Percentage for the Transaction relating to such Reference Obligation. Counterparty shall give notice to Citibank on or prior to the related Obligation Trade Date if any Reference Obligation would be an Excess Concentration Obligation pursuant to the foregoing clause (a).

 

" Expense or Other Payment " means the aggregate amount of any payments (other than extensions of credit) due from the lender(s) in respect of any Reference Obligation, including, without limitation, (a) any expense associated with any amendment, modification or waiver of the provisions of a credit agreement, (b) any reimbursement of any agents under the provisions of a credit agreement, and (c) any indemnity or other similar payment, including amounts owed on or after the related Obligation Termination Date in respect of amounts incurred or any event that occurred before the related Obligation Termination Date.

 

  Page 31
 

" Interest and Fee Amount " means, for any Citibank Fixed Amount Payer Payment Date and any Transaction, the aggregate amount of interest (including interest breakage costs), fees (including, without limitation, amendment, consent, tender, facility, letter of credit and other similar fees) and other amounts (other than in respect of principal and premium paid in respect of principal) paid with respect to the related Reference Obligation (after deduction of any withholding taxes for which the Reference Entities are not obligated to reimburse holders of the related Reference Obligation, if applicable) during the relevant Citibank Fixed Amount Payer Calculation Period; provided that Interest and Fee Amounts:

 

(a) in the case of "Interest and Accruing Fees" (as defined in the "Standard Terms and Conditions for Par/Near Par Trade Confirmations" or "Standard Terms and Conditions for Distressed Trade Confirmations", as applicable to the relevant Reference Obligation, most recently published by the LSTA prior to the Trade Date), shall not include any amounts that accrue prior to the Obligation Settlement Date for the related Reference Obligation or that accrue on or after the Obligation Termination Date for the related Reference Obligation or portion thereof,

 

(b) in the case of "Non-Recurring Fees" (as so defined), shall not include any amounts that (i) are paid on or after the Termination Trade Date for the related Reference Obligation or portion thereof or (ii) are paid with respect to the related Reference Obligation that is not held by or on behalf of Citibank as a hedge for the related Transaction,

 

(c) shall be determined after deducting all customary and reasonable expenses that would be incurred by a buyer in connection with any purchase of the Reference Obligation as a hedge for such Transaction and shall be adjusted by any Delay Compensation as provided in Clause 6(b); and

 

(d) in the case of any Transaction as to which the related Reference Obligation is a Committed Obligation, shall include only 75% of fees that are stated to accrue on or in respect of the unfunded portion of any Commitment Amount.

 

" Loan " means any obligation for the payment or repayment of borrowed money that is documented by a term loan agreement, revolving loan agreement or other similar credit agreement.

 

" LSTA " means The Loan Syndications and Trading Association, Inc. and any successor thereto.

 

" Moody's " means Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or any successor thereto.

 

" Moody's Rating " means, with respect to a Reference Obligation, as of any date of determination:

 

(i) if the Reference Obligation itself is rated by Moody's (including pursuant to any credit estimate), such rating,

 

(ii) if the foregoing paragraph is not applicable, then, if the Reference Obligation is a Loan and the related Reference Entity has a corporate family rating by Moody's, the rating specified in the applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Loan:

 

Loan Relevant Rating
The Loan is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is one rating subcategory above such corporate family rating

  Page 32
 

 

The Loan is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is one rating subcategory below such corporate family rating
The Loan is Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is two rating subcategories below such corporate family rating

 

 

(iii) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, but there is a rating by Moody's on a secured obligation of the Reference Entity that is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate (the "other obligation"), the rating specified in the applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Reference Obligation:

 

Reference Obligation Relevant Rating
The Reference Obligation is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is one rating subcategory below the rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is two rating subcategories below the rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation

 

 

(iv) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, but there is a rating by Moody's on an unsecured obligation of the Reference Entity (or, failing that, an obligation that is a Second Lien Obligation) but is not Subordinate (the "other obligation"), the rating specified in the applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Reference Obligation:

 

Reference Obligation Relevant Rating
The Reference Obligation is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is one rating subcategory above the rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is one rating subcategory below the rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation

 

 

(v) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, but there is a rating by Moody's on an obligation of the Reference Entity that is Subordinate (the "other obligation"), the rating specified in the

 

  Page 33
 

applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Reference Obligation:

 

Reference Obligation Relevant Rating
The Reference Obligation is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is two rating subcategories above the rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating by Moody's that is one rating subcategory above the rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is Subordinate The rating assigned by Moody's to the other obligation

 

 

(vi) if a rating cannot be assigned pursuant to clauses (i) through (v), the Moody's Rating may be determined using any of the methods below:

 

(A) for up to 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount, Counterparty may apply to Moody's for a shadow rating or public rating of such Reference Obligation, which shall then be the Moody's Rating (and Counterparty may deem the Moody's Rating of such Reference Obligation to be "B3" pending receipt of such shadow rating or public rating, as the case may be); provided that (x) a Reference Obligation will not be included in the 10% limit of the Portfolio Target Amount if Counterparty has assigned a rating to such Reference Obligation in accordance with clause (B) below and (y) upon receipt of a shadow rating or public rating, as the case may be, such Reference Obligation will not be included in the 10% limit of the Portfolio Target Amount;

 

(B) for up to 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount, if there is a private rating of an obligor that has been provided by Moody's to Citibank and Counterparty, Counterparty may impute a Moody's Rating that corresponds to such private rating; provided that a Reference Obligation will not be included in the 10% limit of the Portfolio Target Amount if Counterparty has applied to Moody's for a shadow rating; or

 

(C) for up to 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount, the Moody's Rating may be determined in accordance with the methodologies for establishing the S&P Rating except that the Moody's Rating of such obligation will be (1)  one sub-category below the Moody's equivalent of the S&P Rating if such S&P Rating is "BBB-" or higher and (2) two sub-categories below the Moody's equivalent of the S&P Rating if such S&P Rating is "BB+" or lower.

 

For purposes of the foregoing, a "private rating" shall refer to a rating obtained by Citibank, by Counterparty or by or on behalf of an obligor on a Reference Obligation that is not disseminated publicly; whereas a "shadow rating" shall refer to a credit estimate obtained upon application of Counterparty or a holder of a Reference Obligation. Any private rating or shadow rating shall be required to be refreshed annually. If Counterparty applies to Moody's for a shadow rating or public rating of a Reference Obligation, Counterparty shall provide evidence to Citibank of such application and shall notify Citibank of the expected rating. Counterparty shall notify Citibank of the shadow rating or public rating assigned by Moody's to a Reference Obligation.

 

  Page 34
 

" Net Collateral Value " means, as of any date of determination, an amount equal to (a) the aggregate Value (as defined in the Credit Support Annex) on such date of all Posted Credit Support (as so defined) held by Citibank as Secured Party (as so defined) plus (b) the aggregate of all Unrealized Capital Gains on such date with respect to the Reference Portfolio minus (c) the aggregate of all Unrealized Capital Losses on such date with respect to the Reference Portfolio.

 

" Net Collateral Value Percentage " means, as of any date of determination, an amount (expressed as a percentage) equal to (a) the Net Collateral Value on such date divided by (b) the Portfolio Notional Amount on such date.

 

" Non-Standard Reference Obligation " means any Reference Obligation whose inclusion in the Reference Portfolio (other than as a "Non-Standard Reference Obligation") would not on the related Obligation Trade Date satisfy one or more of clauses (viii) through (xii) of the Obligation Criteria.

 

" Portfolio Target Amount " means (a) during the Ramp-Up Period and the Ramp-Down Period, the Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount, (b) at any other time, the Portfolio Notional Amount; provided that, for purposes of clauses (iv) and (v) of the Portfolio Criteria, the Portfolio Target Amount on any date of determination shall be reduced by the sum of the Notional Amounts for all Excess Concentration Obligations as of such date.

 

" Rate Payments " means Counterparty First Floating Amounts, Counterparty Second Floating Amounts and Citibank Fixed Amounts.

 

" Revolving Reference Obligation " means a Reference Obligation that (a) requires the holder thereof to make one or more future advances to the borrower under the instrument or agreement pursuant to which such Reference Obligation was issued or created, (b) specifies a maximum aggregate amount that can be borrowed and (c) permits, during any period on or after the date on which the holder thereof acquires such Reference Obligation, the re-borrowing of any amount previously repaid; provided that, on the date that all commitments by the holder thereof to make advances to the borrower under such Revolving Reference Obligation expire or are terminated or reduced to zero, such Reference Obligation shall cease to be a Revolving Reference Obligation.

 

" S&P " means Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, or any successor thereto.

 

S&P Rating means, with respect to a Reference Obligation:

 

(i) if the Reference Obligation itself is rated by S&P (including pursuant to any credit estimate), such rating,

 

(ii) if the foregoing paragraph is not applicable, then, if the Reference Obligation is a Loan and the related Reference Entity has a corporate issuer rating by S&P, the rating specified in the applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Loan:

 

Loan Relevant Rating
The Loan is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating by S&P that is one rating subcategory above such corporate issuer rating

  Page 35
 

 

The Loan is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating by S&P that is one rating subcategory below such corporate issuer rating
The Loan is Subordinate The rating by S&P that is two rating subcategories below such corporate issuer rating

 

 

(iii) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, but there is a rating by S&P on a secured obligation of the Reference Entity that is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate (the "other obligation"), the rating specified in the applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Reference Obligation:

 

Reference Obligation Relevant Rating
The Reference Obligation is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating by S&P that is one rating subcategory below the rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is Subordinate The rating by S&P that is two rating subcategories below the rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation

 

 

(iv) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, but there is a rating by S&P on an unsecured obligation of the Reference Entity (or, failing that, an obligation that is a Second Lien Obligation) but is not Subordinate (the "other obligation"), the rating specified in the applicable row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Reference Obligation:

 

Reference Obligation Relevant Rating
The Reference Obligation is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating by S&P that is one rating subcategory above the rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is Subordinate The rating by S&P that is one rating subcategory below the rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation

 

 

(v) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, but there is a rating by S&P on an obligation of the Reference Entity that is Subordinate (the "other obligation"), the rating specified in the applicable

 

  Page 36
 

row of the table below under "Relevant Rating" opposite the row in the table below that describes such Reference Obligation:

 

Reference Obligation Relevant Rating
The Reference Obligation is a secured obligation, but is not a Second Lien Obligation and is not Subordinate The rating by S&P that is two rating subcategories above the rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is an unsecured obligation or is a Second Lien Obligation, but is not Subordinate The rating by S&P that is one rating subcategory above the rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation
The Reference Obligation is Subordinate The rating assigned by S&P to the other obligation

 

 

(vi) if the foregoing paragraphs are not applicable, then the S&P Rating shall be "CC"; provided that:

 

(A) if application has been made to S&P to rate a Reference Obligation and such Reference Obligation has a Moody's Rating, then the S&P Rating with respect to such Reference Obligation shall, pending the receipt of such rating from S&P, be equal to the S&P Rating that is equivalent to such Moody's Rating and (y) Reference Obligations in the Reference Portfolio constituting no more, by aggregate Notional Amount, than 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount may be given a S&P Rating based on a rating given by Moody's as provided in clause (x) (after giving effect to the addition of the relevant Reference Obligation, if applicable); and

 

(B) for up to 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount, the S&P Rating may be determined in accordance with the methodologies for establishing the Moody's Rating except that the S&P Rating of such obligation will be (1)  one sub-category below the S&P equivalent of the Moody's Rating if such Moody's Rating is "Baa3" or higher and (2) two sub-categories below the S&P equivalent of the Moody's Rating if such Moody's Rating is "Ba1" or lower

 

" Second Lien Obligation " means a Loan that is secured by collateral, but as to which the beneficiary or beneficiaries of such collateral security agree for the benefit of the holder or holders of other indebtedness secured by the same collateral (" First Lien Debt ") as to one or more of the following: (1) to defer their right to enforce such collateral security either permanently or for a specified period of time while First Lien Debt is outstanding, (2) to permit a holder or holders of First Lien Debt to sell such collateral free and clear of the security in favor of such beneficiary or beneficiaries, (3) not to object to sales of assets by the obligor on such Loan following the commencement of a bankruptcy or other insolvency proceeding with respect to such obligor or to an application by the holder or holders of First Lien Debt to obtain adequate protection in any such proceeding and (4) not to contest the creation, validity, perfection or priority of First Lien Debt.

 

" Subordinate " means, with respect to an obligation (the " Subordinated Obligation ") and another obligation of the obligor thereon to which such obligation is being compared (the " Senior Obligation "), a contractual, trust or similar arrangement (without regard to the existence of preferred creditors arising by operation of law or to collateral, credit support, lien or other credit enhancement arrangements or provisions regarding the application of proceeds of any of the foregoing) providing that (i) upon the liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or winding up of the obligor, claims of the holders of the Senior Obligation will be satisfied prior to the claims of the holders of the Subordinated Obligation or (ii) the holders of the Subordinated Obligation will not be entitled to receive or retain payments in respect of their

 

  Page 37
 

claims against the obligor at any time that the obligor is in payment arrears or is otherwise in default under the Senior Obligation.

 

" Term Obligation " means any Reference Obligation that is not a Committed Obligation.

 

" Terminated Obligation " means any Reference Obligation or portion of any Reference Obligation that is terminated pursuant to Clause 3.

 

" Termination Settlement Date " means, for any Terminated Obligation, the date customary for settlement, substantially in accordance with the then-current market practice in the principal market for such Terminated Obligation (as determined by the Calculation Agent), of the sale of such Terminated Obligation with the trade date for such sale occurring on the related Termination Trade Date.

 

" Termination Threshold " means, on any date of determination from and including the Effective Date, the Cure Threshold minus 5%.

 

" Termination Trade Date " means, with respect to any Terminated Obligation, the date so designated in the related Accelerated Termination Notice; provided that:

 

(a) except as provided in the following paragraph (b), if the related Final Price is not determined in accordance with Clause 4(a), the "Termination Trade Date" will be the bid submission deadline for the Firm Bid or combination of Firm Bids for all of the Reference Amount of such Terminated Obligation that are to be the basis for determining the Final Price of such Terminated Obligation as designated by the Calculation Agent in order to cause the related Total Return Payment Date to occur as promptly as practicable (in the discretion of the Calculation Agent) after the date originally designated as the "Termination Trade Date" pursuant to Clause 3; and

 

(b) in respect of the Scheduled Termination Date, if the related Final Price is not determined in accordance with Clause 4(a), the "Termination Trade Date" will be the date so designated by the Calculation Agent in its discretion, occurring during the 30 calendar days preceding the Scheduled Termination Date (or earlier in the case of any Terminated Obligation determined by the Calculation Agent in its sole discretion to be a distressed loan or other obligation) in a manner reasonably likely to cause the final Total Return Payment Date to occur on the Scheduled Termination Date.

 

The Calculation Agent shall notify the parties of any Termination Trade Date designated by it pursuant to the foregoing proviso.

 

" Total Return Payment Date " means, with respect to any Terminated Obligation or Repaid Obligation, the fifth Business Day next succeeding the last day of the Monthly Period during which the related Obligation Termination Date occurs.

 

" Unrealized Capital Gain " means, with respect to any Reference Obligation, if the Current Price of such Reference Obligation is greater than the Initial Price in relation to such Reference Obligation, then (a) such Current Price minus such Initial Price multiplied by (b) the Reference Amount of such Reference Obligation. For purposes of computing any Unrealized Capital Gain, a Repaid Obligation or Terminated Obligation will be deemed to continue to be outstanding in an amount equal to its Reference Amount until (but excluding) the related Total Return Payment Date (and after the determination of the related Final Price will have a Current Price equal to such Final Price).

 

  Page 38
 

" Unrealized Capital Loss " means, with respect to any Reference Obligation, if the Initial Price in relation to such Reference Obligation is greater than the Current Price of such Reference Obligation, then (a) such Initial Price minus such Current Price multiplied by (b) the Reference Amount of such Reference Obligation. For purposes of computing any Unrealized Capital Loss, a Repaid Obligation or Terminated Obligation will be deemed to continue to be outstanding in an amount equal to its Reference Amount until (but excluding) the related Total Return Payment Date (and after the determination of the related Final Price will have a Current Price equal to such Final Price).

 

  Page 39
 

ANNEX I

 

Reference Portfolio

 

 

Reference Obligation Reference Entity Reference Amount Outstanding Principal Amount Initial Price (%) Obligation Trade Date Obligation Settlement Date Independent Amount Percentage (%)
               

 

 

 

  Page 40
 

ANNEX II

 

Obligation Criteria

 

The " Obligation Criteria " are as follows:

 

(i) The obligation is a Loan.

 

(ii) The obligation is denominated in USD.

 

(iii) The obligation constitutes a legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligation of the applicable Reference Entity, enforceable against such person in accordance with its terms (subject to applicable bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and subject, as to enforceability, to equitable principles of general application (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law)).

 

(iv) Except for any Delayed Drawdown Reference Obligation or Revolving Reference Obligation, the obligation does not require any future advances to be made to the related issuer or obligor on or after the Obligation Trade Date.

 

(v) On the Obligation Trade Date, the obligation is in the form of, and is treated as, indebtedness for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

 

(vi) Transfers thereof on the Obligation Trade Date may be effected pursuant to the Standard Terms and Conditions for Par/Near Par Trade Confirmations and not the Standard Terms and Conditions for Distressed Trade Confirmations, in each case as published by the LSTA and as in effect on the Obligation Trade Date.

 

(vii) The obligation is not Subordinate.

 

(viii) Except for any Non-Standard Reference Obligation, the obligation is not a Second Lien Obligation.

 

(ix) Except for any Non-Standard Reference Obligation, the obligation has as of the Obligation Trade Date a Moody's Rating of at least "B2" and an S&P Rating of at least "B".

 

(x) Except for any Non-Standard Reference Obligation, on the Obligation Trade Date the obligation is part of a fungible class of debt obligations (as to issuance date and all economic terms) of at least USD150,000,000.

 

(xi) Except for any Non-Standard Reference Obligation, the obligation has an Initial Price as of the Obligation Trade Date of at least 80%.

 

(xii) Except for any Non-Standard Reference Obligation, the obligation on the Obligation Trade Date either (x) is the subject of at least two bid quotations from nationally recognized independent dealers in the related obligation as reported on a nationally recognized pricing service or (y) satisfies each of the following two conditions: (A) the obligation was originated not more than 30 days prior to the Obligation Trade Date and (B) the obligation is the subject of at least one bid quotation from a nationally recognized independent dealer in the related obligation as reported on a nationally recognized pricing service.

 

  Page 41
 

 

 

Portfolio Criteria

 

The " Portfolio Criteria " are as follows:

 

(i) The Portfolio Notional Amount does not exceed the Maximum Portfolio Notional Amount.

 

(ii) The sum of the Notional Amounts for all Reference Obligations that are Committed Obligations does not exceed 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount.

 

(iii) The sum of the Notional Amounts for all Reference Obligations that are Non-Standard Reference Obligations does not exceed 20% of the Portfolio Target Amount.

 

(iv) The sum of the Notional Amounts for Reference Obligations (other than any Excess Concentration Obligation so long as the sum of the Notional Amounts for Reference Obligations of any single Reference Entity or any of its Affiliates does not exceed 10% of the Portfolio Target Amount) of any single Reference Entity or any of its Affiliates does not exceed 5% of the Portfolio Target Amount.

 

(v) The sum of the Notional Amounts for Reference Obligations (other than any Excess Concentration Obligation) of Reference Entities in any single Moody's Industry Classification Group does not exceed 15% of the Portfolio Target Amount.

 

(vi) After the Ramp-Up Period and prior to the Ramp-Down Period, the Reference Portfolio has a Weighted Average Rating of at most 3,100.

 

For purposes hereof:

 

" Moody's Industry Classification Groups " means each of the categories set forth in Table 1 below.

 

" Weighted Average Rating " means, as of any date of determination, the number obtained by (a) multiplying the Notional Amount of each Reference Obligation by the applicable Rating Factor (as set forth in Table 2 below) for the related Reference Entity; (b) summing the products obtained in clause (a) for all Reference Obligations; and (c) dividing the sum obtained in clause (b) by the aggregate of the Notional Amounts of all Reference Obligations.

 

  Page 42
 

 

Table 1

 

Moody's Industry Classification Groups

 

Aerospace & Defense

Automotive

Banking, Finance, Insurance and Real Estate

Beverage, Food, & Tobacco

Capital Equipment

Chemicals, Plastics, & Rubber

Construction & Building

Consumer goods: durable

Consumer goods: non-durable

Containers, Packaging, & Glass

Energy: Electricity

Energy: Oil & Gas

Environmental Industries

Forest Products & Paper

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

High Tech Industries

Hotel, Gaming, & Leisure

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

Media: Broadcasting & Subscription

Media: Diversified & Production

Metals & Mining

Retail

Services: Business

Services: Consumer

Sovereign & Public Finance

Telecommunications

Transportation: Cargo

Transportation: Consumer

Utilities: Electric

Utilities: Oil & Gas

Utilities: Water

Wholesale

  Page 43
 

Table 2

 

Rating Factors

 

 

Moody's Rating Rating Factor
Aaa 1
Aa1 10
Aa2 20
Aa3 40
A1 70
A2 120
A3 180
Baa1 260
Baa2 360
Baa3 610
Ba1 940
Ba2 1,350
Ba3 1,766
B1 2,220
B2 2,720
B3 3,490
Caa1 4,770
Caa2 6,500
Caa3 8,070
Below Caa3 10,000

 

 

  Page 44
 

Annex III

 

Approved Buyers

 

Bank of America, NA

The Bank of Montreal

The Bank of New York Mellon, N.A.

Barclays Bank plc

BNP Paribas

Citibank, N.A.

Credit Agricole S.A.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

Credit Suisse

Deutsche Bank AG

Goldman Sachs & Co.

HSBC Bank

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Morgan Stanley & Co.

Natixis

Northern Trust Company

Royal Bank of Canada

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc

Scotia Capital

Societe Generale

The Toronto-Dominion Bank

UBS AG

U.S. Bank, National Association

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

 

 

  Page 45

 



Exhibit 31.1

I, Nicholas S. Schorsch, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 of Business Development Corporation of America;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
November 13, 2013
/s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
 
 
Nicholas S. Schorsch
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)




Exhibit 31.2
 
I, Nicholas Radesca, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 of Business Development Corporation of America;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
November 13, 2013
/s/ Nicholas Radesca
 
 
Nicholas Radesca
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




Exhibit 32
 
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.
 
The undersigned, who are the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Business Development Corporation of America (the “Company”), each hereby certify as follows:
 
To the best of his knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
Dated this  13 th day of November, 2013
 
/s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
Nicholas S. Schorsch
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
/s/ Nicholas Radesca
Nicholas Radesca
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)