UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2015

 

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

 

Commission File Number: 000-51030

 

TearLab Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

  Delaware     59 343 4771
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

9980 Huennekens Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(858) 455-6006

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [X]
   
Non-accelerated filer [  ]  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 33,712,364 as of August 3, 2015.

 

 

 

 
 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
     
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) F-1
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 4
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 13
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 13
     
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION  
     
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 14
Item 1A. Risk Factors 14
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 28
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 28
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 28
Item 5. Other Information 28
Item 6. Exhibits 29

 

2
 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements relating to future events and our future performance within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “pursue,” “potential” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to future events, future results, and future economic conditions in general and statements about:

  

  Our future strategy, structure, and business prospects;
     
  The planned commercialization of our current product;
     
  The size and growth of the potential markets for our product and technology;
     
 

The adequacy of current, and the development of new distributor, reseller, and supplier relationships, and our efforts to expand relationships with distributors and resellers in additional countries;

     
  Our anticipated expansion of United States and international sales and operations;
     
  Our ability to obtain and protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights;
     
  The results of our clinical trials;
     
 

Our plan to continue to develop and execute our conference and podium strategy to ensure visibility and evidence-based positioning of the TearLab® Osmolarity System among eye care professionals;

     
  Our anticipated sales to customers in the United States;
     
  Our ability to obtain reimbursement for patient testing with the TearLab® System;
     
 

Our efforts to assist our customers in obtaining their CLIA waiver certifications or providing them with support from certified professionals;

     
 

The adequacy of our funding and our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations; and

     
  Use of cash, cash needs and ability to raise capital.

 

These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks described in Part II, Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances, time frames or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on academic and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. We have not reviewed or included data from all sources and cannot assure you of the accuracy of the market and industry data we have included.

 

Unless the context indicates or requires otherwise, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to the “Company” shall mean TearLab Corporation or TearLab Corp. and its subsidiaries. References to “$” or “dollars” shall mean U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.

 

3
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(expressed in U.S. dollars )

($ 000’s)

 

    June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
    (Unaudited)        
ASSETS                
Current assets                
Cash   $ 15,891     $ 16,338  
Accounts receivable, net     2,231       2,480  
Inventory     3,753       2,986  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     842       890  
Total current assets     22,717       22,694  
                 
Fixed assets, net     5,062       4,504  
Patents and trademarks, net     66       80  
Intangible assets, net     2,833       3,596  
Other non-current assets     183       157  
Total assets   $ 30,861     $ 31,031  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable   $ 1,893     $ 2,202  
Accrued liabilities     3,140       3,765  
Deferred rent and revenue     132       174  
Obligations under warrants     139       256  
Total current liabilities     5,304       6,397  
                 
Long-term debt     14,796        
                 
Total liabilities     20,100       6,397  
                 
Exchange right     250       250  
                 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)                
                 
Stockholders’ equity                
Capital stock                
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 10,000,000, none outstanding            
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 65,000,000 authorized, 33,712,364 and 33,641,302 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively     34       34  
Additional paid-in capital     486,276       483,909  
Accumulated deficit     (475,799 )     (459,559 )
Total stockholders’ equity     10,511       24,384  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 30,861     $ 31,031  

 

See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements

 

F- 1
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(expressed in U.S. dollars except number of shares)

(Unaudited)

($ 000’s except number of shares and (loss) per share)

 

    Three months ended  
    June 30,  
    2015     2014  
             
Product sales   $ 4,920     $ 4,058  
Reader equipment rentals     1,425       941  
Total revenue   $ 6,345     $ 4,999  
Costs and operating expenses                
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of intangible assets)     2,812       2,128  
Cost of goods sold - reader equipment depreciation     404       337  
General and administrative     3,673       3,591  
Clinical, regulatory and research & development     1,711       608  
Sales and marketing     5,065       3,825  
Amortization of intangible assets     382       395  
Total operating expenses     14,047       10,884  
Loss from operations     (7,702 )     (5,885 )
Other income (expense)                
Interest income (expense)     (488 )     9  
Amortization of deferred financing charge     (16 )     -  
Changes in fair value of warrant obligations     4       415  
Other, net     130       22  
Total other income (expense)     (370 )     446  
Net loss and comprehensive loss   $ (8,072 )   $ (5,439 )
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic     33,658,153       33,584,980  
Net loss per share – basic   $ (0.24 )   $ (0.16 )
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted     33,703,584       33,720,896  
Net loss per share – diluted   $ (0.24 )   $ (0.17 )

 

See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements

 

F- 2
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(expressed in U.S. dollars except number of shares)

(Unaudited)

($ 000’s except number of shares and (loss) per share)

 

    Six months ended  
    June 30,  
    2015     2014  
             
Product sales   $ 9,011     $ 7,510  
Reader equipment rentals     2,741       1,699  
Total revenue   $ 11,752     $ 9,209  
Costs and operating expenses                
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of intangible assets)     5,246       4,055  
Cost of goods sold - reader equipment depreciation     749       609  
General and administrative     7,309       6,718  
Clinical, regulatory and research & development     3,115       1,183  
Sales and marketing     10,343       7,753  
Amortization of intangible assets     764       698  
Total operating expenses     27,526       21,016  
Loss from operations     (15,774 )     (11,807 )
Other income (expense)                
Interest income (expense)     (628 )     16  
Amortization of deferred financing charge     (31 )     -  
Changes in fair value of warrant obligations     116       722  
Other, net     77       72  
Total other income (expense)     (466 )     810  
Net loss and comprehensive loss   $ (16,240 )   $ (10,997 )
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic     33,650,479       33,567,787  
Net loss per share – basic   $ (0.48 )   $ (0.33 )
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted     33,697,938       33,729,222  
Net loss per share – diluted   $ 0.49     $ (0.35 )

 

See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements

 

F- 3
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

($ 000’s)

 

    Six months ended  
    June 30,  
    2015     2014  
             
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                
Net loss for the period   $ (16,240 )   $ (10,997 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:                
Stock-based compensation     2,231       1,900  
Depreciation of fixed assets     892       668  
Amortization of patents and trademarks     14       14  
Amortization of intangible assets     764       698  
Changes in fair value of warrant obligations     (116 )     (722 )
Loss on disposal of fixed assets     -       2  
Amortization of deferred financing charges     31       -  
Interest accrued     221       -  
Net change in working capital and non-current asset balances related to operations     (1,532 )     (739 )
Cash used in operating activities     (13,735 )     (9,176 )
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                
Additions to fixed assets, net of proceeds     (1,392 )     (1,776 )
Cash paid for business acquisition     -       (1,400 )
Cash used in investing activities     (1,392 )     (3,176 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                
Term loan     14,544       -  
Proceeds from the issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares     98       -  
Proceeds from the exercise of options     38       175  
Cost of issuance of shares     -       (30 )
Cash provided by financing activities     14,680       145  
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period     (447 )     (12,207 )
Cash, beginning of period     16,338       37,778  
Cash, end of period   $ 15,891     $ 25,571  

 

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements

 

F- 4
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(expressed in U.S. dollars except as otherwise stated)

(Unaudited)

 

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

Nature of Operations

 

TearLab Corporation (formerly OccuLogix, Inc.) (“TearLab” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is an ophthalmic device company that is commercializing a proprietary in vitro diagnostic tear testing platform, the TearLab® test for dry eye disease, or DED, which enables eye care practitioners to test for highly sensitive and specific biomarkers using nanoliters of tear film at the point-of-care.

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

 

Liquidity and Going Concern

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will continue to operate as a going concern and which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. However, the Company has sustained substantial losses of $16.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company's working capital surplus at June 30, 2015 is $17.4 million, which represents a $1.1 million increase from its working capital at December 31, 2014.  As a result of the Company’s history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.  The Company’s existing cash as of June 30, 2015 plus the ability to access the second tranche from CRG (gross proceeds of $10.0 million) may not be sufficient to cover the Company’s operating and other cash demands through the end of the second quarter of 2016, if it does not successfully complete additional fund raising activities including achievement of the third tranche revenue milestone to access an additional $10.0 million of debt financing, or decrease the cash consumed by operating activities.

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company entered into an amendment of the term loan agreement with CRG on August 6, 2015. The Company received $15,000,000 in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015, and additional amounts up to $10,000,000 are available to TearLab, through November 2015. A third tranche of $10,000,000 is available to the Company subject to the satisfaction of a revenue milestone and other borrowing conditions. The third tranche is contingent on the Company achieving $38,000,000 in twelve-month sales revenue prior to June 30, 2016. The Company also has a shelf registration statement available which can be used to raise up to $25 million in equity capital, contingent upon market conditions. The Company can make no assurance that it will be able to raise either additional debt financing or additional equity capital beyond the second tranche funding of $10.0 million from CRG. There can be no assurances that there will be adequate financing available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all.

 

A successful transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon obtaining sufficient financing to fund the Company’s planned expenses and achieving a level of revenues adequate to support the Company’s cost structure. If events or circumstances occur such that we do not meet our operating plan during the second half of 2015, we may be required to reduce operating expenses and reduce the planned levels of inventory and fixed assets which could have an adverse impact on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts classified as liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be forced to take any such actions.

 

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. These consolidated condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

 

F- 5
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited consolidated condensed financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared using significant accounting policies that are consistent with the policies used in preparing the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014. Management believes that all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results, consisting of normally recurring items, have been included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgment relate to revenue and inventory reserves, impairment of long-lived and intangible assets, and the fair value of stock options and warrants.

 

Revenue recognition

 

Revenue is recognized when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s timing of revenue recognition is impacted by factors such as passage of title, payments and customer acceptance. Amounts received in excess of revenue recognizable are deferred.

 

Our revenues are primarily derived from the sale of disposable test cards. We sell our proprietary TearLab® Osmolarity System and related test cards to our customers, who are primarily eye care professionals, for use in osmolarity testing procedures. Our products are generally shipped from our primary distribution and warehousing operations facility located in San Diego, California. The Company’s sales are currently direct to customers in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom and to distributors in South America, Europe and Asia.

 

The Company enters into contracts where revenue is derived either from agreements whereby the customer is provided the right to use the TearLab® Osmolarity System (reader equipment) at no separate cost to the customer in consideration for a minimum purchase commitment of disposables over the related contract term (referred to as either “Use Agreements”, “Masters Agreements” or “Flex Agreements”), or from agreements with sales of multiple deliverables, such as the reader equipment and disposable test cards (referred to as “Purchase Agreements”).

 

The Company recognizes its revenue as being either product sales revenue (primarily for the sale of test cards) or reader equipment rental revenue (for either the explicit or the implicit lease of the reader to the customer). For the implicit lease revenue, revenue is calculated based on the fair value of the readers, recognized proportionately with respect to the fair value of the test cards. Purchase commitments for Use Agreements and Flex Agreements are expressed in the agreement for a specified period of time (generally one to three years), and the purchase commitment for Masters Agreements is implied for large physician practices with an expectation of purchasing certain levels of test cards. The Company recovers the cost of providing the reader equipment in the amount charged for disposables. These agreements are treated as operating leases as collectability of the minimum lease payments is not reasonably predictable at the outset of the arrangement. Accordingly, revenue is recognized over the defined contract term as disposable test cards are shipped. When reader equipment is placed with a customer at no separate cost, the Company retains title to the equipment and it remains capitalized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as equipment classified within fixed assets, net. The equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis once shipped to a customer location over its estimated useful life and depreciation expense is included in Cost of Goods Sold within the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

Revenue recognition for Purchase Agreements with multiple deliverables is based on the individual units of accounting determined to exist in the contract. A delivered item is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Items are considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the item on a stand-alone basis. Considering that test cards are essential to the operation of a TearLab reader, there is no alternative vendor for the test cards and no indication that a secondary market for the TearLab readers is established, the deliverables under the contracts entered into during 2014 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 do not meet criteria for separation under the multiple-element arrangements guidance. Consideration is allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables based on their relative selling price. The relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price or third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the deliverable. The Company recognizes revenue for each of the elements only when it determines that all applicable recognition criteria have been met.

 

F- 6
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Although the Company typically has a no return policy for its products, the Company has established a reserve for product sales that contain an implicit right of return. The Company reserves for estimated returns or refunds by reducing revenues at the time of shipment based on historical experience. The reserve of $64,000 and $77,000 as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, has reduced revenue and is included in accounts receivable.

 

Warrant liabilities

 

The Company issued several rounds of warrants related to various debt and equity transactions which occurred in 2011. The Company accounts for its warrants issued in accordance with the US GAAP accounting guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815 applicable to derivative instruments, which requires every derivative instrument within its scope to be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Based on this guidance, the Company determined that the Company’s warrants do not meet the criteria for classification as equity. Accordingly, the Company classified the warrants as current liabilities. The warrants are subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date, with any change in fair value recognized as a component of other income (expense), net in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company estimated the fair value of these warrants at the respective balance sheet dates using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the market value of the underlying common stock at the valuation measurement date, the remaining contractual term of the warrant, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends on and expected volatility of the price of the underlying common stock. There is a degree of subjectivity involved when using option pricing models to estimate warrant liability and the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model are judgmental.

 

Acquisition

 

On March 14, 2014, the Company acquired the net assets of the OcuHub business unit from AOAExcel, Inc., the for-profit subsidiary of the American Optometric Association (“AOA”) in an all cash transaction for $1.4 million and a working capital deficit of $201,000. Of the net purchase price, $1,564,000 was allocated to intangible assets, $38,000 to property, plant and equipment, $30,000 to prepaid expense and $230,000 to accrued liabilities. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with the authoritative guidance. The allocation of initial purchase price is based on our valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the closing. The fair value assigned to intangible assets has been determined primarily by using a variation of the income approach known as the discounted cash flow method, which estimates the value based on the present value of the after-tax free cash flows attributable to owning the intangible asset.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accountings Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASU 2014-09, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. Early application is not permitted. On April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to propose a deferral of the effective date of the standard by one year which would result in the new standard being effective for the Company at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of the new standard, including possible transition alternatives, on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the Financial Accountings Standards Board issued guidance which requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related disclosures in certain circumstances. Under the new guidance, disclosures are required when conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the financial statement issuance date. The guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and all annual and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have any impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations and, at this time, the Company does not expect any impact on its disclosures.

 

F- 7
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset. While adoption of this guidance is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, the Company elected to adopt this guidance early, as of March 31, 2015.

 

3. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS

 

A ccounts Receivable

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
             
Trade receivables   $ 2,640     $ 2,904  
                 
Allowance for doubtful accounts     (409 )     (424 )
    $ 2,231     $ 2,480  

 

Inventory

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
             
Finished goods   $ 3,779     $ 2,990  
Inventory reserves     (26 )     (4 )
                 
    $ 3,753     $ 2,986  

 

Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market and consists of finished goods. Inventory is accounted for on a first-in, first-out basis.

 

The Company evaluates inventory for estimated excess quantities and obsolescence, based on expected future sales levels and projections of future demand, and establishes inventory reserves for obsolete and excess inventories. In addition, the Company assesses the impact of changing technology and market conditions. The Company has entered into a long-term purchase commitment to buy the test cards from MiniFAB (Note 13). The purchase commitment contains required minimum annual purchases and a total purchase commitment under the manufacturing agreement. As part of its analysis of excess or obsolete inventories, the Company considers future annual minimum purchases, estimated future usage and the expiry dating of the cards to determine if any inventory reserve is needed.

 

F- 8
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Prepaid Expenses

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
Prepaid trade shows   $ 191     $ 177  
Prepaid insurance     119       301  
Manufacturing deposits     152       182  
Subscriptions     1       82  
Other fees and services     333       142  
Other current assets     46       6  
    $ 842     $ 890  

 

Fixed Assets

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
Capitalized TearLab equipment   $ 6,917     $ 5,655  
Leasehold improvements     64       51  
Computer equipment and software     952       819  
Furniture and office equipment     312       267  
Medical equipment     425       426  
    $ 8,670     $ 7,218  
Less accumulated depreciation     (3,608 )     (2,714 )
    $ 5,062     $ 4,504  

 

Depreciation expense was $892,000 and $668,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $478,000 and $370,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

Patents and trademarks

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
Patents   $ 236     $ 236  
Trademarks     32       32  
      268       268  
Accumulated amortization     (203 )     (188 )
    $ 66     $ 80  

 

Amortization expense of patents and trademarks was $14,000 and $14,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $7,000 and $7,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

Accrued liabilities

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
Due to professionals   $ 315     $ 787  
Due to employes and directors     1,527       1,589  
Goods received but not yet invoiced     1       17  
Sales and use tax liabilities     246       221  
Royalty liability     367       330  
Readers and tests cards in transit     212       -  
Other     472       821  
    $ 3,140     $ 3,765  

 

F- 9
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

The Company’s intangible assets consist of the value of TearLab® Technology acquired in the acquisition of TearLab Research and the value of the OcuHub platform technology acquired in the acquisition of the OcuHub business unit from AOAExcel. The TearLab Technology consists of a disposable lab card and card reader, supported by an array of patents and patent applications that are either held or in-licensed by the Company. The TearLab Technology is being amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 10 years. The OcuHub platform technology consists of the right to access and commercialize the OcuHub cloud-based technology platform which facilitates an effective and efficient shared care model providing secure connectivity between doctors, patients, institutions and payers. The OcuHub platform technology is being amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 5 years. Amortization expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $382,000, $395,000, $764,000 and $698,000, respectively.

 

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following:

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014  
          Accumulated           Accumulated  
    Cost     Amortization     Cost     Amortization  
                         
TearLab® technology   $ 12,172     $ 10,499     $ 12,172     $ 9,892  
OcuHub platform technology     1,564       404       1,564       248  
    $ 13,736     $ 10,903     $ 13,736     $ 10,140  

 

The estimated amortization expense for the intangible assets for the remainder of 2015 and each of the remaining five years is as follows:

 

      Amortization of  
(in thousands)     intangible assets  
         
Remainder of 2015     $ 763  
2016       1,379  
2017       313  
2018       313  
2019       65  
      $ 2,833  

 

5. TERM LOAN

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG LP and certain of its affiliate funds (“CRG”) as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company entered into an amendment of the term loan agreement with CRG on August 6, 2015. The Company received $15,000,000 in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015, and additional amounts up to $10,000,000 are available to TearLab, through November 2015. A third tranche of $10,000,000 is available to the Company subject to the satisfaction of a revenue milestone and other borrowing conditions. The third tranche is contingent on the Company achieving $38,000,000 in twelve-month sales revenue prior to June 30, 2016.

 

The agreement has a term of six years and bears interest at 13% per annum, with quarterly payments of interest only for the first four years. While interest on the loan is accrued at 13% per annum, the Company may elect to make interest-only payments at 8.5% per annum. The unpaid interest of 4.5% is added to the principal of the loan and is subject to additional accrued interest. The accrued interest can be deferred and paid together with the principal in the fifth and sixth years. As part of the amended agreement, CRG received 350,000 warrants when the $10.0 million is received to purchase common shares of the Company at a price of $5.00 per share. The warrants have a five- year life.

 

At June 30, 2015, the principal balance outstanding under the CRG LP Term Loan was $15,221,000. Financing and legal fees were recorded as a $456,000 direct discount to the long-term debt which is being amortized with the effective interest method. The Company has elected early adoption of the authoritative accounting guidance that requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset.

 

F- 10
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The agreement provides for prepayment fees of 5% of the outstanding balance of the loan if the loan is repaid prior to December 31, 2015. The prepayment fee is reduced 1% per year for each subsequent year until maturity.

 

The loan is collateralized by all assets of the Company. Additionally, the terms of the Term Loan Agreement contain various affirmative and negative covenants agreed to by the Company. Among them, the Company must attain minimum certain annual revenues and minimum cash threshold levels. The minimum annual revenue threshold level required by the Term Loan is $25.0 million for calendar year 2015. The minimum cash balance required is $5.0 million, subject to certain conditions.

 

If the Company does not have annual revenues greater or equal to the annual minimum revenue covenant in a calendar year, the Company will have the right within 90 days of the end of the respective calendar year to raise subordinated debt or equity ( the “CRG Equity Cure”) equal to twice the difference between the annual revenue and the revenue covenant, with the total proceeds from this financing to be used to reduce the principal of the CRG LP Term Loan. In the event the Company does not achieve the minimum revenue threshold and it cannot complete the CRG Equity Cure, it may be in default of the Term Loan. In the event of a default, we may be required to repay any outstanding amounts earlier than anticipated, and the lenders may foreclose on their security interest in our assets.

 

Borrowings under the term loan are subject to certain conditions, including the non-occurrence of a material adverse change in our business or operations (financial or otherwise), or a material impairment of the prospect of repayment of obligations.

 

As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants.

 

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

On August 20, 2009, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Science with Vision Inc., pursuant to which Science with Vision obtained exclusive Canadian distribution rights with respect to the Company’s products. The Company began selling products through the Canadian distributor in 2010. On September 3, 2013, the Company and Science with Vision Inc. agreed to terminate the distribution agreement including exclusive distribution rights of TearLab products in Canada. In consideration of the termination agreement, the Company agreed to a one-time payment to Science with Vision Inc. of $200,000 Canadian dollars and a royalty on all sales in Canada of products for which Science with Vision Inc. had exclusive distribution rights. Royalties are recorded as cost of goods sold in the income statement in the period in which revenue is recognized for the associated products sold. The Company’s chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer has a material financial interest in Science with Vision. Royalty expense related to the termination agreement with this distributor for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $4,000, $3,000, $6,000 and $5,000, respectively, and the outstanding accrued liability balances at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $3,000.

 

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company measures certain assets and liabilities in accordance with authoritative guidance which requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

 

  Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
     
  Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
     
  Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available.

 

Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the ability to observe valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy. The Company did not have any assets or liabilities in Level 1 and Level 2 and no transfers to or from Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

 

At June 30, 2015, the Company has a liability for warrants to purchase 219,604 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.86 per share valued at $139,000 (Note 8). The warrant liability is classified as a Level 3 fair value measurement.

 

F- 11
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The following table provides a reconciliation for the warrant liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2015 (in thousands):

 

    Fair Value Measurements  
    Using Significant  
    Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)  
Balance of warrant liability at January 1, 2015   $ 256  
Warrant exercises     -  
Change in fair value of warrant liability included in other (income) / expense     (117 )
Balance of warrant liability at June 30, 2015   $ 139  

 

8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

(a) Authorized share capital

 

The total number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company is 65,000,000. Each share of common stock has a par value of $0.001 per share. The total number of authorized shares of preferred stock of the Company is 10,000,000. Each share of preferred stock has a par value of $0.001 per share.

 

(b) Common stock

 

The Company has funded operations over the years through the issuance of equity in public and private offerings including on July 30, 2013, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 2.99 million shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $13.50 per share. The Company received gross proceeds of $40,365,000, with associated costs of $3,055,000.

 

(c) Stock Option Plan

 

The Company has a stock incentive plan, the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). Under the Stock Incentive Plan, up to 7,200,000 options are available for grant to employees, directors and consultants. Options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan may be either incentive stock options or non-statutory stock options. Under the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan, the exercise price per share for an incentive stock option shall not be less than the fair market value of a share of stock on the effective date of grant and the exercise price per share for non-statutory stock options shall not be less than 85% of the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of grant. No option granted to a holder of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock shall have an exercise price per share less than 110% of the fair market value of a share of stock on the effective date of grant.

 

Options granted are typically service-based options. Generally, options expire 10 years after the date of grant. No incentive stock options granted to a 10% owner optionee shall be exercisable after the expiration of five years after the effective date of grant of such option, no option has been granted to a prospective employee, prospective consultant or prospective director prior to the date on which such person commences service, and with the exception of an option granted to an officer, director or consultant, no option shall become exercisable at a rate less than 20% per annum over a period of five years from the effective date of grant of such option unless otherwise approved by the Board.

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the authoritative guidance which requires that share-based payment transactions with employees be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value and recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period. The amount of expense recognized during the period is affected by subjective assumptions, including: estimates of the Company’s future volatility, the expected term for its stock options, option exercise behavior, the number of options expected to ultimately vest, and the timing of vesting for the Company’s share-based awards.

 

F- 12
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss (in thousands):

 

    Three months ended     Six months ended  
(in thousands)   June 30,     June 30,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
                         
General and administrative   $ 600     $ 819     $ 1,107     $ 1,346  
Clinical, regulatory and research and development     120       37       223       78  
Sales and marketing     450       231       901       476  
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes   $ 1,170     $ 1,087     $ 2,231     $ 1,900  

 

(d) Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

In July 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, which was approved by the Company’s stockholders in June 2014 at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A total of 671,500 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved for issuance under the plan, which permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll deductions.

 

The price at which stock is purchased under the ESPP is equal to 90% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or the last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. Generally, each offering under the ESPP will be for a period of six months as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. Employees may invest up to 20% of their gross compensation through payroll deductions. In no event may an employee invest more than $25,000 worth of stock in the plan during each calendar year or more than 5,000 shares per offering period. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company received employee contributions totaling $98,000 and issued 54,211 shares of common stock.

 

As the ESPP is a compensatory plan as defined by the authoritative guidance for stock compensation, stock-based compensation expense of $20,000 and $39,000 is applicable to the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The fair value of each purchase option under the ESPP is estimated at the beginning of each six-month offering period using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions.

 

Volatility     73.8 %
Expected life     0.5 years  
Risk-free interest rate     0.13 %
Dividend yield     0 %

 

(e) Warrants

 

On June 13, 2011, the Company issued shares of its common stock as well as warrants (“Financing Warrants”) to purchase 109,375 shares of its common stock in consideration of conversion and retirement of the Company’s outstanding July and August 2009 debt obligations. The exercise price of the Financing Warrants is $1.60 per common share representing the price per share equal to the closing bid price per share of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ stock market on July 15, 2009. There were 74,063 of these warrants outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On June 30, 2011, the Company closed a private placement financing in which 3,846,154 shares of common stock and warrants (“2011 Warrants”) to purchase 3,846,154 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 were issued. The investors purchased the shares and warrants for $1.82 per unit (each unit consisting of one share and one warrant to purchase shares of common stock). The exercise price of the warrants is $1.86 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time from the date of issuance until June 30, 2016. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants at the date of issuance using the Black Scholes option model with a 101% volatility, 5.0 years expected life and a risk-free interest rate of 1.76%. The fair value of $5,518,000 was classified as a current liability as the Company determined that these warrants do not meet the criteria for classification as equity.

 

F- 13
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The Company initially allocated the total proceeds received, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, to the shares of common stock and warrants issued based on their relative fair values. This resulted in an allocation of $3,012,000 of proceeds to warrant liability. The Company remeasures the fair value of the warrants at the end of each reporting period, resulting in an adjustment to the warrant obligations, with any gain or loss recorded in earnings of the applicable reporting period.

 

The estimated fair value of the 2011 Warrants at June 30, 2015 was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

Volatility     72.5 %
Expected life of Warrants     1.0 years  
Risk-free interest rate     0.28 %
Dividend yield     0 %

 

The fair value of the 2011 warrants is highly sensitive to the changes in the Company’s stock price and stock price volatility.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 certain holders of 2011 Warrants exercised 0 and 304,945 warrants, respectively. The Company received $0 in proceeds from the cashless exercises during the six month period ended June 30, 2014. The Company is required to record the outstanding warrants at fair value at the time of exercise, before moving the fair value into additional paid-in capital, resulting in an adjustment to the warrant obligations, with any gain or loss recorded in earnings of the applicable reporting period. The Company, therefore, estimated the fair value of the exercised 2011 Warrants in the first quarter of 2014 at their respective exercise dates to be $2,616,000, an increase in value of $263,000 from the previous value at December 31, 2013. This increase was recorded as an expense in other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

The Company recorded the outstanding warrants at fair value at the end of each reporting period, resulting in an adjustment to the warrant obligations, with any gain or loss recorded in earnings of the applicable reporting period. The Company estimated the fair value of the remaining warrants as of June 30, 2015 to be $139,000, a decrease of $4,000 and $116,000 from the previous values at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. These amounts were recorded as income to other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. No warrants have been exercised to date in 2015.

 

F- 14
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The following table provides activity for the warrants outstanding through June 30, 2015 (in thousands, except weighted average exercise prices):

 

      Number of      
      warrants     Weighted average  
      outstanding     exercise price  
               
Outstanding, December 2013       599     $ 1.83  
Exercised       (305 )     1.86  
Expired       -       -  
                   
Outstanding, June 30, 2014       294       1.79  
Exercised       -       -  
Expired       -       -  
Outstanding, June 30, 2015       294     $ 1.79  

 

(f) Exchange Right

 

In August 2014, the Company sold membership units in OcuHub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of TearLab Corporation. The membership units sold generated cash proceeds of $250,000 in exchange for 2% ownership of OcuHub LLC. In connection with the sale of the membership units, the new members received an exchange right allowing the units to be exchanged upon written notice and during a specified exchange window for shares in our common stock. The first available exchange window follows the one year anniversary date of the purchase of membership units. The variable number of shares of common stock provided upon exchange is equal to the initial capital contribution amount received for the membership units sold divided by the closing sales price of TearLab Corporation common stock during the respective exchange window. Due to the exchange right option available to the membership unit holders, the entire loss from continuing operations related to OcuHub LLC of $984,000 and $1,771,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, has been attributed to TearLab Corporation within the consolidated financial statements.

 

9. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, comprehensive loss was equal to net loss for each period.

 

10. NET LOSS PER SHARE

 

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and vested restricted stock units outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss), less any dilutive amounts recorded during the period for the change in fair value of warrant liabilities, by the weighted average number of common shares and vested restricted stock units outstanding and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, from stock options, warrants, and non-vested restricted stock units. Common stock equivalents are only included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when their effect is dilutive. Diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 includes the dilutive impact of the gain recorded from the Company’s June 30, 2011 warrants increasing the loss in the numerator by $4,000 and $116,000 for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2015 and includes the additional common stock equivalents related to the warrants of 45,431 and 47,459 in the denominator for the respective periods. Diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 includes the dilutive impact of the gain recorded from the Company’s June 30, 2011 warrants increasing the loss in the numerator by $415,000 and $722,000 for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2014 and includes the additional common stock equivalents related to the warrants of 135,916 and 161,435 in the denominator for the respective periods.

 

The following securities were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effects were anti-dilutive (in thousands) :

 

    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
Stock options     6,471       5,995       6,471       5,995  
Warrants     74       74       74       74  
                                 
Total     6,545       6,069       6,545       6,069  

 

F- 15
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

11. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

The net change in working capital and non-current asset balances related to operations consists of the following (in thousands) :

 

    Six Months Ended  
(in thousands)   June 30,  
    2015     2014  
Accounts receivable, net   $ 249     $ 521  
Inventory     (768 )     (1,387 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets     48       189  
Other non-current assets     (26 )     (12 )
Accounts payable     (309 )     (195 )
Accrued liabilities     (684 )     79  
Deferred rent and revenue     (42 )     66  
    $ (1,532 )   $ (739 )

 

The following table lists those items that have been excluded from the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as they relate to non-cash transactions and additional cash flow information (in thousands) :

 

    Six months ended  
    June 30,  
(in thousands)   2015     2014  
             
Reclass of warrant liabilities to Stockholders Equity upon exercise of warrants     -     $ 2,616  
Additions to fixed assets included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ (59 )   $ 192  

 

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

On August 1, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary, TearLab Research, Inc., entered into a manufacturing and development agreement, or the Manufacturing Agreement, with MiniFAB (Aust) Pty Ltd, or MiniFAB. Pursuant to the terms of the Manufacturing Agreement, MiniFAB will manufacture and supply test cards for the Company. The Manufacturing Agreement specifies minimum order quantities that will require the Company to purchase approximately $7.9 million (AUD$10.3 million) in test cards from MiniFAB through the end of 2015 of which $3.5 million (AUD $4.6 million) has been on order as of June 30, 2015. The Company is also subject to annual minimum order commitments under the Manufacturing Agreement. The Manufacturing Agreement has a ten-year initial term and may be terminated by either party if the other party is in breach or becomes insolvent. If terminated for any reason other than default by MiniFAB, the Company will be obligated to pay a termination fee based on the cost of products manufactured by MiniFAB, but not yet invoiced, repayment of capital invested by MiniFAB, less depreciation calculated in accordance with Australian accounting standards, and the expected profit to MiniFAB had the remaining minimum order quantities been purchased by the Company.

 

The Company has evaluated its 2015 outstanding purchase commitment with MiniFab to determine the potential amount of liability the Company may be obligated to pay if it doesn’t meet its annual order commitment. Having reviewed the submitted orders for test cards to MiniFAB for the six months ended June 30, 2015, if the Company does not: 1) order the sufficient additional test cards to meet the 2015 minimum order commitment under the agreement or 2) seek to modify the existing minimum order quantity with MiniFab, the Company will be subject to liquidated damages estimated at $4.4 million (AUD $5.7 million). The Company is currently in discussions with MiniFAB negotiating a new agreement.

 

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On July 6, 2015, the Company announced the appointment of Wes Brazell as its chief financial officer. In this announcement, the Company also announced its intention to move its corporate headquarters to Dallas, Texas from San Diego, California before the end of 2015. This move will involve certain severance charges and transition expenses.

 

On Aug 6, 2015, the Company announced that it had entered into an amended and restated term loan agreement with CRG LP and certain of its affiliate funds (“CRG”) which modified certain provisions of the original term loan agreement dated March 4, 2015. Under the amended terms, the revenue milestones required to access the second tranche borrowing of $10.0 million have been removed, which gives the Company immediate access to an additional $10.0 million of debt financing as needed through November 2015. As consideration, CRG will receive when the $10.0 million is received, 350,000 warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at a price of $5.00 per share. The warrants have a five year life from the date of the agreement. All other terms and conditions of the term loan agreement remain unchanged including the repayment and interest payment provisions. The revenue milestone to gain access to the third borrowing tranche of $10.0 million remains unchanged and requires the Company to achieve 12 month revenue of $38.0 million by June 30, 2016.

 

F- 16
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes, included in Item 1 of this Report. Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are U.S. dollars.

 

Overview

 

We are an in vitro diagnostic company that has developed a proprietary tear testing platform, the TearLab® Osmolarity System. The TearLab test measures tear film osmolarity for diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease, or DED. Tear osmolarity is a quantitative and highly specific biomarker that has been shown to correlate with DED. The TearLab test enables the rapid measurement of tear osmolarity in a doctor’s office. Commercializing our Point-of-Care tear testing platform is now the focus of our business.

 

In October 2008, the TearLab Osmolarity System received CE mark approval, clearing the way for sales in the European Union and all countries recognizing the CE mark. In connection with the CE mark clearance, we have entered into multi-year agreements with numerous distributors for distribution of the TearLab Osmolarity System. Currently, we have signed distribution agreements in each of the following countries: Spain, Portugal, Germany, France, Turkey, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, South Korea, Australia, Russia, Hungary, Greece, Slovakia, Argentina, the Czech Republic, a sales representation agreement in Japan and are selling directly to the customer in Canada and the United Kingdom.

 

On May 19, 2009, we announced that we received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. The 510(k) clearance allows us to market the TearLab Osmolarity System to those reference and physician operated laboratories with CLIA certifications allowing them to perform moderate and high complexity tests. Our efforts were then focused on obtaining a CLIA waiver from the FDA for the TearLab Osmolarity System as a CLIA waiver greatly reduces the regulatory compliance for our customers.

 

On October 19, 2010 we announced that a unique new Current Procedural Terminology, or CPT, code that will apply to the TearLab Osmolarity test had been published by the American Medical Association, or AMA. The new code became effective January 1, 2011. The new CPT code for the TearLab Osmolarity test is: 83861; Microfluidic analysis utilizing an integrated collection and analysis device, tear osmolarity (For microfluidic tear osmolarity of both eyes, report 83861 twice). This code falls under the Chemistry sub-section of the Pathology and Laboratory section of the CPT Codebook and was listed under the 2010 Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS. The payment code of 83861 that currently applies to the TearLab Osmolarity Test will be cross-walked or paired with code 84081. At current 2014 reimbursement rates, payment code 83861 would be reimbursed in every state by CMS at $22.54 per eye. This decision by CMS provides level reimbursement for and equal access to the TearLab Osmolarity Test across all of the United States.

 

4
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

On January 23, 2012, we announced that after reviewing and accepting labeling submitted to it by the Company, the FDA had granted the waiver categorization under CLIA for the TearLab Osmolarity System.

 

On March 14, 2014, we announced the closing of the acquisition of the assets of the OcuHub business unit from AOAExcel, Inc., the for-profit subsidiary of the American Optometric Association (“AOA”) in an all cash transaction for $1.4 million. OcuHub, powered by AT&T and Covisint, facilitates an effective and efficient shared care model with a single sign-on portal, which simplifies secure connectivity between doctors, patients, institutions and payers. It is a subscription-based service that is HIPAA compliant and eliminates the need for a complex and expensive IT structure. The OcuHub platform will be a competitive advantage for EHR incentive payments, access to insured patients, participation in ACOs and other new payment systems and represents another important step toward TearLab creating an unprecedented partnership within the eye care community.

 

Our success is highly dependent on our ability to increase sales of our testing platform in the United States as well as Europe and other countries recognizing the CE mark and in Canada where we have a Medical Device License. Meeting these objectives requires that we have sufficient capital to fund our operations. However, the Company has sustained substantial losses of $16.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. As a result of the Company’s history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The Company’s existing cash as of June 30, 2015 plus the ability to access the second tranche from CRG (gross proceeds of $10.0 million) may not be sufficient to cover the Company’s operating and other cash demands through the end of the second quarter of 2016, if it does not successfully complete additional fund raising activities including achievement of the third tranche revenue milestone to access an additional $10.0 million of debt financing, or decrease the cash consumed by operating activities.

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG LP and certain of its affiliate funds (“CRG”) as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company entered into an amendment of the term loan agreement with CRG on August 6, 2015. The Company received $15,000,000 in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015, and additional amounts up to $10,000,000 are available to TearLab, through November 2015. A third tranche of $10,000,000 is available to the Company subject to the satisfaction of a revenue milestone and other borrowing conditions. The third tranche is contingent on the Company achieving $38,000,000 in twelve-month sales revenue prior to June 30, 2016. The Company also has a shelf registration statement available which can be used to raise up to $25 million in equity capital, contingent upon market conditions. The Company can make no assurance that it will be able to raise either additional debt financing or additional equity capital beyond the second tranche funding of $10.0 million from CRG. There can be no assurances that there will be adequate financing available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all.

 

5
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Revenue, Cost of Sales and Gross Margin

 

Revenues

 

    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
(in thousands)   2015     2014     Change     2015     2014     Change  
                                     
TearLab revenue   $ 6,345     $ 4,999     $ 1,346     $ 11,752     $ 9,209     $ 2,543  
                                                 
TearLab – cost of sales     3,216       2,465       751       5,995       4,664       1,331  
                                               
TearLab gross profit     3,129       2,534       595       5,757       4,545       1,212  
                                                 
Gross profit percentage     49 %     51 %             49 %     49 %        

 

TearLab Revenue

 

TearLab revenue consists of sales of the TearLab® Osmolarity System, which is a hand-held tear film test for the measurement of tear osmolarity, a quantitative and highly specific biomarker that has shown to correlate with dry eye disease (“DED”).

 

The TearLab Osmolarity System consists of the following three components: (1) the TearLab disposable, which is a single-use microfluidic lab test card; (2) the TearLab pen, which is a hand-held device that interfaces with the TearLab disposable; and (3) the TearLab reader, which is a small desktop unit that allows for the docking of the TearLab disposable and the TearLab pen and provides a quantitative reading for the operator.

 

TearLab revenue increased by $1,346,000 or 27% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year quarter. The increase is primarily driven from test card sales volume representing $1,247,000 of the total increase from the prior year quarter as well as an increase in reader revenue of $99,000. Test card volume increase is consistent with the increase of new customers signed onto the Company’s annual test card commitment programs and its high volume large multi-doctor practice programs for domestic customer.

 

TearLab revenue increased by $2,543,000 or 28% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year period. The increase is primarily driven from test card sales volume representing $2,487,000 of the total increase from the prior year period as well as an increase in reader revenue of $56,000. Test card volume increase is consistent with the increase of new customers signed onto the Company’s annual test card commitment programs and its high volume large multi-doctor practice programs for domestic customers.

 

TearLab Cost of Sales

 

TearLab cost of sales includes costs of goods sold, depreciation, warranty, and royalty costs. Our cost of goods sold consists primarily of costs for the manufacture of the TearLab test, including the costs we incur for the purchase of component parts from our suppliers, applicable freight and shipping costs, fees related to warehousing and logistics inventory management.

 

TearLab cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased by $751,000 or 30% compared to the same prior year fiscal period of which $635,000 was due to increased volumes of TearLab test cards in the overall sales product mix, as the Company focuses its sales activities to its domestic customers on its annual test card commitment programs and its high volume large multi-doctor practice programs and the fixed costs related to our OcuHub subsidiary of $166,000 for which there was no comparative cost for 2014.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, TearLab cost of sales increased by $1,331,000 or 29% over the same prior year fiscal period of which $1,215,000 was due to increased volumes of TearLab test cards in the overall sales product mix, as the Company focuses its sales activities to its domestic customers on its annual test card commitment programs and its high volume large multi-doctor practice programs and the fixed costs related to our OcuHub subsidiary of $166,000 for which there was no comparative cost for 2014.

 

6
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

TearLab Gross Margin

 

TearLab gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased by $595,000 or 23% compared to the same prior year fiscal period. The increase is mainly due to higher sales volume. The gross margin percentage of revenue for the quarter ending June 30, 2015 was 49% as compared to 51% for the prior year fiscal period which is primarily due to the fixed cost related to OcuHub activities slightly offset by the lower cost associated with test cards sold during the period including the impact of the weakening Australian dollar at the time of purchasing test card inventory.

 

TearLab gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased by $1,212,000 or 27% compared to the same prior year fiscal period. The increase is mainly due to higher sales volume. The gross margin percentage of revenue for the six month period ending June 30, 2015 was 49% as compared to 49% for the prior year fiscal period which is primarily due to the fixed cost related to OcuHub activities offset by the lower cost associated with test cards sold during the period including the impact of the weakening Australian dollar at the time of purchasing test card inventory.

 

    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(in thousands)   2015     2014     Change     2015     2014     Change  
                                     
Amortization of intangible assets   $ 382     $ 395     $ (13 )   $ 764     $ 698     $ 66  
                                                 
General and administrative     3,673       3,591       82       7,309       6,718       591  
                                                 
Clinical, regulatory and research and development     1,711       608       1,103       3,115       1,183       1,932  
                                                 
Sales and marketing     5,065       3,825       1,240       10,343       7,753       2,590  
                                                 
Operating expenses   $ 10,831     $ 8,419     $ 2,412     $ 21,531     $ 16,352     $ 5,179  

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, general and administrative expense increased by $82,000 or 2% as compared with the corresponding same prior year period primarily due to an increase of $280,000 in professional fees, and an increase of $114,000 in administrative expenses, travel and public company costs offset by a decrease of $216,000 in stock-based compensation expense primarily related to the decrease in the valuation of annual options granted to the Board of Directors and a decrease of $96,000 in employee costs and travel.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, general and administrative expenses increased by $591,000 or 9%, as compared with the corresponding prior year period primarily due to an increase of $357,000 increase in professional and legal fees, an increase of $189,000 in administrative costs, an increase of $282,000 in employee costs, travel, depreciation and public company costs offset by a decrease of $236,000 in stock-based compensation expense primarily related to the decrease in the valuation of annual options granted to the Board of Directors.

 

We are continuing to focus our efforts on controlling costs by reviewing and improving upon our existing business processes and cost structure.

 

Clinical, Regulatory and Research and Development Expenses

 

Total clinical, regulatory and research and development expenses increased by $1,103,000 or 181% during the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared with the corresponding prior year period. The increase was primarily due to a $911,000 increase in research and development expenses related to next generation diagnostic products as well as an increase of $209,000 in employee costs, stock-based compensation expense, clinical trials, travel and administrative expenses.

 

Total clinical, regulatory and research and development expenses increased by $1,932,000 or 163% during the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared with the corresponding prior year period. The increase was mainly due to a $1,573,000 increase in research and development expenses related to next generation diagnostic products, as well as an increase of $316,000 in employee costs, stock-based compensation expense, clinical trials, travel and administrative expenses.

 

7
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Sales and Marketing Expense

 

Sales and marketing expenses increased by $1,240,000 or 32% during the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared with the comparable period in the corresponding prior year period primarily due to a $784,000 increase related to employee costs arising from increased staffing to meet expanded sales territories, $253,000 increase in travel costs associated with the continued focus on commercialization of the TearLab product in the United States, and a $223,000 increase in stock-based compensation expense.

 

Sales and marketing expenses increased by $2,590,000 or 33% during the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared with the comparable period in the corresponding prior year period primarily due to a $1,720,000 increase related to employee costs arising from increased staffing to meet expanded sales territories, a $339,000 increase in marketing costs, a $266,000 increase in travel costs associated with the continued focus on commercialization of the TearLab product in the United States, and a $423,000 increase in stock-based compensation expense offset by a reduction of $133,000 in professional services.

 

The cornerstone of our sales and marketing strategy to date has been to increase awareness of our products among eye care professionals and, in particular, the key opinion leaders in the eye care professions. We assist key opinion leaders in performing clinical trials to generate increased data to provide an increased understanding in the use of the TearLab Osmolarity System for diagnostic, treatment and monitoring of patients. Presently we are primarily focused on increasing sales in North America and we continue to develop and execute our conference and podium strategy to ensure visibility and evidence-based positioning of the TearLab® Osmolarity System among eye care professionals.

 

Amortization of Intangible Assets

 

Amortization expense of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was $382,000 and $764,000, as compared to $395,000 and $698,000 in the prior year fiscal periods, with the change related to the intangible assets acquired in the OcuHub business unit purchase from AOAExcel, Inc.in March 2014.

 

Other Income (Expense)

 

    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
(in thousands)   2015     2014     Change     2015     2014     Change  
                                     
Interest income (expense)   $ (488 )   $ 9     $ (497 )   $ (628 )   $ 16     $ (644 )
                                                 
Amortization of deferred financing charge     (16 )     -       (16 )     (31 )     -       (31 )
                                                 
Changes in fair value of warrant obligations     4       415       (411 )     116       722       (606 )
                                                 
Other (net )     130       22       108       77       72       5  
                                                 
Other income   $ (370 )   $ 446     $ (816 )   $ (466 )   $ 810     $ (1,276 )

 

Interest Income (Expense)

 

For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, interest expense of $493,000 and $640,000, respectively, represented the interest for the CRG term loan; of which at June 30, 2015, $419,000 had been paid in cash and $221,000 was deferred interest included on the balance sheet as long-term debt; offset in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 by $5,000 and 11,000 in interest received for the Company’s cash and cash equivalents. Interest income of $9,000 and $16,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of interest received for the Company’s cash and cash equivalents.

 

8
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Amortization of Deferred Financing Charge

 

In recording the CRG term loan, the Company recorded a discount on long-term debt, representing a loan financing fee and certain legal expenses associated with the financing. This discount is being amortized using the effective interest method. The amortization expense in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 was $15,000 and $31,000, respectively. There was no comparable cost in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Changes in Fair Value of Warrants Obligations

 

The Company is required to record the outstanding warrants at fair value at the end of each reporting period, resulting in an adjustment to the warrant obligations, with any gain or loss recorded in earnings for the applicable period. The Company recorded income related to a decrease in the fair value of warrant obligations of $4,000 and $116,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015. The amount was recorded as income to other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015.

 

At the beginning of the six month period ended June 30, 2014, the Company had a total of 524,549 warrants subject to fair value re-measurement each quarter. During the first quarter of 2014 certain holders of warrants exercised 304,945 warrants. The Company is required to record the outstanding warrants at fair value at the time of exercise, resulting in an adjustment to the warrant obligations, with any gain or loss recorded in earnings of the applicable reporting period. The Company, therefore, estimated the fair value of the exercised warrants during the first quarter 2014 to be $2,616,000, an increase of $263,000 from the previous value at December 31, 2013. This increase was recorded as a charge to other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014. There were no warrant exercises during the second quarter of 2014.

 

In addition, the Company is also required to record the outstanding warrants at fair value at the end of each reporting period, resulting in an adjustment to the warrant obligations, with any gain or loss recorded in earnings of the applicable reporting period. The Company, therefore, estimated the fair value of the remaining warrants as of June 30, 2014 to be $709,000, a decrease of $985,000 from the previous value at December 31, 2013; including a decrease of $570,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and a decrease of $415,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. These amounts were recorded as income to other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the primary driver of this change being a change in Black-Scholes valuation inputs for our decreased stock price.

 

Other

 

Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses, based on fluctuations of the Company’s foreign denominated currencies. In addition, in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company realized a one-time gain of $147,000 on the cancellation of an accrued liability related to the acquisition of the net assets of the OcuHub business unit from AOAExcel on March 14, 2014.

 

9
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

(in thousands)   June 30, 2015     December 31, 2014     Change  
                   
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 15,891     $ 16,338     $ (447 )
Percentage of total assets     51 %     53 %        
                         
Working capital   $ 17,413     $ 16,297     $ 1,116  

 

Cash decreased from $16.3 million to $15.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35.0 million under the arrangement. The Company received $15.0 million in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015.

 

Financial Condition

 

Based on our current run rates of cash consumption and our ability to access the 2nd tranche $10.0 million from the CRG term loan agreement, we will need additional capital sometime in the second quarter of 2016, and our prospects for obtaining that capital are uncertain. The Company may be able to raise either additional debt financing or additional equity financing. The CRG term loan agreement provides for an increase in the term loan of up to $10.0 million, provided that the Company achieves twelve-month sales revenues of at least $38.0 million prior to June 30, 2016. The Company also has a shelf registration statement available which can be used to raise up to $25 million in equity capital, contingent upon market conditions. The Company can make no assurance that it will be able to raise either additional debt financing or additional equity capital. There can be no assurances that there will be adequate financing available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all. However, unless we succeed in raising additional capital, or significantly decrease the cash consumed in operating the business we anticipate that we will be unable to continue our operations through the end of the second quarter of 2016. As a result of the Company’s history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

 

Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement and involves risks and uncertainties. Actual results could vary as a result of a number of factors. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including but not limited to:

 

  whether government and third-party payers agree to reimburse the TearLab Osmolarity System;
     
  whether eye care professionals engage in the process of obtaining their CLIA waiver certification;
     
  the costs and timing of building the infrastructure to market and sell the TearLab® Osmolarity System;
     
  the cost and results of continuing development of the TearLab Osmolarity System;
     
  the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
     
  the effect of competing technological and market developments; and
     
  our purchases of test cards are in Australian dollars and fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar and Australian dollar may be material. In the 12 months ended June 30, 2015, the exchange rate incurred to purchase Australian dollars to pay our Australian supplier fluctuated from $0.76 USD to $0.94 USD per $1.00 AUD.

 

Further, a successful transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon obtaining sufficient financing to fund the Company’s planned expenses and achieving a level of revenues adequate to support the Company’s cost structure. If events or circumstances occur such that we do not meet our operating plan during the first nine months of 2015, we may be required during the fourth quarter of 2015 to reduce operating expenses and reduce the planned levels of inventory and fixed assets which could have an adverse impact on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives.

 

10
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Indebtedness

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG LP and certain of its affiliate funds (“CRG”) as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company entered into an amendment of the term loan agreement with CRG on August 6, 2015. The Company received $15,000,000 in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015, and additional amounts up to $10,000,000 are available to TearLab, through November 2015. A third tranche of $10,000,000 is available to the Company subject to the satisfaction of a revenue milestone and other borrowing conditions. The third tranche is contingent on the Company achieving $38,000,000 in twelve-month sales revenue prior to June 30, 2016. As part of the amendment in the term loan agreement, CRG will receive 350,000 warrants to purchase an equal number of common shares in the Company at a price of $5.00 per share when the $10.0 million is received by TearLab. The warrants have a life of five years. The agreement has a term of six years and bears interest at 13% per annum, with quarterly payments of interest only for the first four years. At the Company’s option, during the first four years a portion of the interest payments may be deferred and paid together with the principal in the fifth and sixth years.

 

The minimum annual revenue threshold level required by the Term Loan for calendar year 2015 is $25.0 million. The minimum cash balance required is $5.0 million, subject to certain conditions.

 

If the Company does not have annual revenues greater or equal to the annual revenue covenant in a calendar year, the Company will have to raise subordinated debt or equity (the “CRG Equity Cure”) equal to twice the difference between the annual revenue and the revenue covenant, with the total proceeds from this financing to be used to reduce the principal of the CRG LP Term Loan. In the event the Company does not achieve the minimum revenue threshold and it cannot complete the CRG Equity Cure, it may be in default of the Term Loan. In the event of a default, we may be required to repay any outstanding amounts earlier than anticipated, and the lenders may foreclose on their security interest in our assets.

 

Ongoing Sources and Uses of Cash

 

We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents cash from the 2nd tranche of CRG funding of $10.0 million and cash generated from increased revenues, will be sufficient to sustain our operations until approximately the second quarter of 2016. We continually evaluate various financing possibilities but we typically expect our primary sources of cash will be related to the collection of accounts receivable and, to a lesser degree, interest income on our cash balances. Our accounts receivable collections will be impacted by our ability to grow our point-of-care revenue.

 

We expect our primary uses of cash will be to fund our operating expenses and pursuing and maintaining our patents and trademarks. In addition, dependent on available funds, we expect to expend cash to improve production capability of the TearLab test, to further improve the performance of the TearLab test, and to pursue additional applications for the lab-on-a-chip technology.

 

Changes in Cash Flows

 

    Six months ended June 30,
(in thousands)
 
    2015     2014     Change  
Cash used in operating activities   $ (13,735 )   $ (9,176 )   $ (4,559 )
Cash used in investing activities     (1,392 )     (3,176 )     1,784
Cash provided by financing activities     14,680       145       14,535
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the period   $ (447 )   $ (12,207 )   $ 11,760

 

Cash Used in Operating Activities

 

Net cash used to fund our operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $13,735,000. Net loss during the six-month period was $16,240,000. The non-cash items which comprise a portion of the net loss during that period consist primarily of the amortization of intangible assets, patents and trademarks, depreciation of fixed assets, stock-based compensation and changes in the fair value of warrant obligations in the aggregate total of $4,037,000. The unfavorable overall working capital change is primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable as a result of cash collected from customers and an increase in inventory due to restocking for anticipated demand for our products.

 

11
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The net change in working capital balances related to operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 consists of the following:

 

    Six months ended June 30,
(in thousands)
 
Cash provided (used)   2015     2014  
Amounts receivable, net   $ 249     $ 521  
Inventory     (768 )     (1,387 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets     48       189  
Other non-current assets     (26 )     (12 )
Accounts payable     (309 )     (195 )
Accrued liabilities     (684 )     79  
Deferred rent / revenue     (42 )     66  
    $ (1,532 )   $ (739 )

 

Cash Used in Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $1,392,000 and $3,176,000, respectively, to acquire fixed assets, primarily readers related to the Company’s annual test card commitment programs or its high volume large multi doctor practice programs, as well as $1,400,000 of cash used to acquire the net assets of the OcuHub business unit from AOAExcel, Inc in the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG LP and certain of its affiliate funds (“CRG”) as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company received $14,544,000 in net proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued 71,062 shares of common stock as a result of the exercise of options and ESPP for gross proceeds of $136,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company issued 53,097 shares of common stock as a result of the exercise of options for gross proceeds of $175,000.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles that are generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We continually evaluate our estimates and judgments, the most critical of which are those related to revenue recognition and inventory valuation. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known.

 

There were no significant changes during the six months ended June 30, 2015 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. For further clarification with regards to the Company’s specific policies for revenue recognition, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2015 included in Item 1.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

For information on the recent accounting pronouncements impacting our business, see Note 2 of the Notes to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2015 included in Item 1.

 

12
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Currency Fluctuations and Exchange Risk

 

Our sales are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars with minimal sales in Euros and pounds sterling, while a minor portion of our expenses are in Canadian dollars, Australian dollars and Pounds sterling. Our purchases of test cards are in Australian dollars. We cannot predict any future trends in the exchange rate of the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Euro or Pound sterling against the U.S. dollar. Any strengthening of the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Euro or Pound sterling in relation to the U.S. dollar would increase the U.S. dollar cost of our operations, and affect our U.S. dollar measured results of operations. We maintain bank accounts in Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, Euros and Pound sterling to meet short term operating requirements. Based on the balances in the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Euro and Pound sterling denominated bank accounts at June 30, 2015, hypothetical increases of $0.01 in the value of the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar, the Euro and the Pound sterling in relation to the U.S. dollar would impact our results of our operations by less than $15,000. We do not engage in any hedging or other transactions intended to manage these risks. In the future, we may undertake hedging or other similar transactions or invest in market risk sensitive instruments if we determine that is advisable to offset these risks.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

The primary objective of our investment activity is to preserve principal while maximizing interest income we receive from our cash resources, without increasing risk. We believe this will minimize our market risk. We do not use interest rate derivative transactions to manage our interest rate risk. We reduce our exposure to interest rate risk by investing in savings or money market accounts. Declines in interest rates over an extended period of time will reduce our interest income while an increase over an extended period of time will increase our interest income. A reduction of interest rate by 100 basis points over the 12 months ended June 30, 2015 would reduce interest income by $11,000.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefit of controls must be considered relative to their costs. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as at June 30, 2015 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

 

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

During the second quarter of 2015, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

13
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

We are not aware of any material litigation involving us that is outstanding, threatened or pending.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

 

Risks Relating to our Business

 

Our near-term success is highly dependent on the continued success of the TearLab® Osmolarity System, and we cannot be certain that it will be successfully commercialized in the United States.

 

The TearLab Osmolarity System is currently our only product. Our product is currently sold outside of the United States pursuant to CE mark approval; in Canada pursuant to a Health Canada Medical Device License; and in the United States as a result of having received 510(k) approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, to market the TearLab Osmolarity System to those reference and physician operated laboratories with Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act, or CLIA, waiver certifications. Even though the TearLab Osmolarity System has received all regulatory approvals in the United States, it may never be successfully commercialized sufficiently to sustain our commercial operations. If the TearLab Osmolarity System is not as successfully commercialized as expected, we may not be able to generate revenue, become profitable or continue our operations. Any failure of the TearLab Osmolarity System to be successfully commercialized in the United States would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows and could result in a substantial decline in the price of our common stock.

 

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness, which currently consists of our credit facility with CRG LP. We may not be able to satisfy our minimum revenue and cash covenants, as required by the CRG LP term loan. If our annual sales revenue levels do not meet or exceed the levels required by the CRG covenants, we will be required to raise additional equity or subordinated debt, with the proceeds paid to reduce the outstanding principal of the CRG term loan. This financing could dilute existing shareholders and impact the value of their investment.

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company entered into an amendment of the term loan agreement with CRG on August 6, 2015. The Company received $15,000,000 in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015, and additional amounts up to $10,000,000 are available to TearLab, through November 2015. A third tranche of $10,000,000 is available to the Company subject to the satisfaction of a revenue milestone and other borrowing conditions. The third tranche is contingent on the Company achieving $38,000,000 in twelve-month sales revenue prior to June 30, 2016. The Company also has a shelf registration statement available which can be used to raise up to $25 million in equity capital, contingent upon market conditions. The Company can make no assurance that it will be able to raise either additional debt financing or additional equity capital beyond the second tranche funding of $10.0 million from CRG. There can be no assurances that there will be adequate financing available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all. 

 

The agreement has a term of six years and bears interest at 13% per annum, with quarterly payments of interest only for the first four years. While interest on the loan is accrued at 13% per annum, the Company may elect to make interest-only payments at 8.5% per annum. The unpaid interest of 4.5% is added to the principal of the loan and is subject to additional accrued interest. The accrued interest can be deferred and paid together with the principal in the fifth and sixth years. As part of the amended agreement, CRG received 350,000 warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at a price of $5.00. The warrants have a five year life.

 

14
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on numerous factors, including the amount of our cash reserves and our actual and projected financial and operating performance. These amounts and our performance are subject to certain financial and business factors, as well as prevailing economic and competitive conditions, some of which may be beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will maintain a level of cash reserves or cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our existing or future indebtedness. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot assure you that we would be able to take any of these actions, or that these actions would permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition, in the event of our breach of the term loan agreement with CRG, we may not be allowed to draw additional amounts under the agreement, we may be required to repay any outstanding amounts earlier than anticipated, and the lenders may foreclose on their security interest in our assets.

 

The loan is collateralized by all assets of the Company. Additionally, the terms of the Term Loan Agreement contain various affirmative and negative covenants agreed to by the Company. Among them, the Company must attain minimum certain annual revenues and minimum cash threshold levels. The minimum annual revenue threshold levels required by the Term Loan are $25.0 million, $35.0 million, $45.0 million, $60.0 million, $75.0 million and $85.0 million for calendar years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 2019 and 2020, respectively. The minimum cash balance required is $5.0 million, subject to certain conditions.

 

If the Company does not have annual revenues greater or equal to the annual revenue covenant in a calendar year, the Company will have to raise subordinated debt or equity (the “CRG Equity Cure”) equal to twice the difference between the annual revenue and the revenue covenant, with the total proceeds from this financing to be used to reduce the principal of the CRG LP Term Loan. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve the annual revenue thresholds and the daily cash threshold. We cannot assure you that we would be able to raise the financing for the CRG Equity Cure, if required. In addition, in the event of our breach of the term loan agreement with CRG, we may not be allowed to draw additional amounts under the agreement, we may be required to repay any outstanding amounts earlier than anticipated, and the lenders may foreclose on their security interest in our assets.

 

Borrowings under the term loan are subject to certain conditions, including the non-occurrence of a material adverse change in our business or operations (financial or otherwise), or a material impairment of the prospect of repayment of obligations.

 

Our existing term loan agreement contains restrictive and financial covenants that may limit our operating flexibility.

 

Our existing term loan agreement with CRG contains certain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness and liens, merge with other companies or consummate certain changes of control, acquire other companies, engage in new lines of business, make certain investments, pay dividends, transfer or dispose of assets, amend certain material agreements or enter into various specified transactions. We therefore may not be able to engage in any of the foregoing transactions unless we obtain the consent of the lender or terminate the term loan agreement. There is no guarantee that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow or sales to meet the financial covenants or pay the principal and interest under the agreement. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that future working capital, borrowings or equity financing will be available to repay or refinance the amounts outstanding under the agreement.

 

15
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Our financial condition and history of losses have caused our auditors to express doubt as to whether we will be able to continue as a going concern.

 

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using US GAAP applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

 

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. On March 4, 2015, the Company executed a term loan agreement with CRG LP and certain of its affiliate funds (“CRG”) as lenders providing the Company with access of up to $35,000,000 under the arrangement. The Company entered into an amendment of the term loan agreement with CRG on August 6, 2015. The Company received $15,000,000 in gross proceeds under the arrangement on March 4, 2015, and additional amounts up to $10,000,000 are available to TearLab, through November 2015. A third tranche of $10,000,000 is available to the Company subject to the satisfaction of a revenue milestone and other borrowing conditions. The third tranche is contingent on the Company achieving $38,000,000 in twelve-month sales revenue prior to June 30, 2016. The Company also has a shelf registration statement available which can be used to raise up to $25 million in equity capital, contingent upon market conditions. The Company can make no assurance that it will be able to raise either additional debt financing or additional equity capital beyond the second tranche funding of $10.0 million from CRG. There can be no assurances that there will be adequate financing available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all.

 

There are no assurances that the Company will be successful and without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if we were not able to continue as a going concern.

 

16
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

We are leveraged financially, which could adversely affect our ability to adjust our business to respond to competitive pressures and to obtain sufficient funds to satisfy our future research and development needs, and to defend our intellectual property.

 

As of June 30, 2015, our total indebtedness was approximately $15,200,000. Our significant debt and debt service requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. For example, our high level of debt presents the following risks:

 

  our substantial leverage increases our vulnerability to economic downturns and adverse competitive and industry conditions and could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors that are less leveraged;
     
  our debt service obligations could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry and could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities, borrow more money for operations or capital in the future and implement our business strategies; and
     
  our level of debt may restrict us from raising additional financing on satisfactory terms to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements.

 

If we are at any time unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our indebtedness when payment is due, we may be required to attempt to renegotiate the terms of the instruments relating to the indebtedness, seek to refinance all or a portion of the indebtedness or obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully renegotiate such terms, that any such refinancing would be possible or that any additional financing could be obtained on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us.

 

We may not achieve the revenue objectives in the CRG term loan. If these levels are not achieved, we may not be able to increase its borrowings under the term loan and may need to raise equity in order to repay portions of this balance.

 

The minimum annual revenue threshold levels required by the Term Loan are $25.0 million, $35.0 million, $45.0 million, $60.0 million, $75.0 million and $85.0 million for calendar years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 2019 and 2020, respectively. The CRG term loan agreement; subsequent to the amendment to eliminate the revenue covenant to obtain the second tranche; provides for an increase in the term loan of up to $10.0 million, as required by the Company. The CRG term loan agreement provides for an additional increase of $10.0 million, provided that the Company achieves twelve-month sales revenues of at least $38.0 million prior to June 30, 2016. There can be no assurances that the Company can achieve these revenue thresholds in order to qualify for the increases in the CRG term loan.

 

If the Company does not have annual revenues greater or equal to the annual revenue covenant in a calendar year, the Company will have to raise subordinated debt or equity (the “CRG Equity Cure”) equal to twice the difference between the annual revenue and the revenue covenant, with the total proceeds from this financing to be used to reduce the principal of the CRG LP Term Loan. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve the annual revenue thresholds and the daily cash threshold. We cannot assure you that we would be able to raise the financing for the CRG Equity Cure, if required. In addition, in the event of our breach of the term loan agreement with CRG, we may not be allowed to draw additional amounts under the agreement, we may be required to repay any outstanding amounts earlier than anticipated, and the lenders may foreclose on their security interest in our assets.

 

Borrowings under the term loan are subject to certain conditions, including the non-occurrence of a material adverse change in our business or operations (financial or otherwise), or a material impairment of the prospect of repayment of obligations.

 

Our near-term success is dependent on increasing sales of the TearLab Osmolarity System outside the United States, and we cannot be certain that we will successfully increase such sales.

 

Our product is currently sold outside of the United States pursuant to CE mark approval and Health Canada Approval in Canada. Our near-term success is dependent on increasing our international sales. We may also be required to register our product with health departments in our foreign market countries. A failure to successfully register in such markets would negatively affect our sales in any such markets. In addition, import taxes are levied on our product in certain foreign markets. These foreign markets include Turkey, Spain, Italy and France. Other countries may adopt taxation codes on imported import, distribute and price our product.

 

17
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Our commitment to purchase minimum levels of product from our suppliers may result in the purchase of excess quantities of product if we are not able to successfully commercialize the TearLab Osmolarity System.

 

On August 1, 2011, we entered into a manufacturing and development agreement, or the Manufacturing Agreement, with MiniFAB (Aust.) Pty Ltd, or MiniFAB. Pursuant to the terms of the Manufacturing Agreement, MiniFAB will manufacture and supply test cards for us. The Manufacturing Agreement specifies minimum order quantities that will require us to purchase approximately USD $7.9 million (AUD$10.3 million) in test cards from MiniFAB for the years 2014 and 2015. Each year, we must purchase the covered test cards exclusively from MiniFAB until the minimum order quantity for such year has been met. The Manufacturing Agreement has a ten-year initial term and may be terminated by either party if the other party is in breach or becomes insolvent. If terminated for any reason other than a default by MiniFAB, we will be obligated to pay a termination fee based on the cost of products manufactured by MiniFAB, but not yet invoiced, repayment of capital invested by MiniFAB, less depreciation calculated in accordance with Australian accounting standards, and the expected profit to MiniFAB had the remaining minimum order quantities been purchased by us.

 

The usage of test cards purchased under the minimum purchase commitment with MiniFAB is predicated upon significant increases in revenue from the TearLab products as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 and prior periods. If we are not able to commercialize the TearLab ® Osmolarity System sufficiently to sell the minimum order quantities required by the MiniFab Agreement, we will be required to purchase test cards that we may be unable to use and that may become obsolete, which would have a potentially adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Our limited working capital and history of losses have resulted in doubts as to whether we will be able to continue as a going concern.

 

In the years ended December 31, 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2015, we have prepared our consolidated financial statements on the basis that we would continue as a going concern. However, we have incurred losses in each year since our inception. Our net working capital balance at June 30, 2015 was $17.4 million, which represents a $1.1 million increase in the balance from our working capital of $16.3 million at December 31, 2014.

 

Although current levels of cash flows are negative, management believes the Company’s existing cash will be sufficient to cover its operating and other cash demands until the second quarter of 2016.

 

Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if we were not able to continue as a going concern.

 

18
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

We have incurred losses since inception and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future.

 

We have incurred losses in each year since our inception. As of June 30, 2015, we had an accumulated deficit of $475.8 million. Our losses have resulted primarily from expenses incurred in research and development of our product candidates from the former retina and glaucoma business divisions. We do not know when or if we will successfully commercialize the TearLab Osmolarity System in the United States to the extent that operations are sustainable. As a result, and because of the numerous risks and uncertainties facing us, it is difficult to provide the extent of any future losses or the time required to achieve profitability, if at all. Any failure of our product to become and remain profitable would adversely affect the price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations.

 

We have outstanding liabilities, which could adversely affect our ability to adjust our business to respond to competitive pressures and to obtain sufficient funds to satisfy our future research and development needs, and to defend our intellectual property.

 

As of June 30, 2015, our total liabilities were approximately $20.1 million. Our significant liability service requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. For example, our high level of liability presents the following risks:

 

  our liabilities increase our vulnerability to economic downturns and adverse competitive and industry conditions and could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors that are less leveraged;
     
  our liability obligations could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry and could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities, borrow money for operations or capital in the future and implement our business strategies; and
     
  our level of liabilities may restrict us from raising additional funds on satisfactory terms to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements.

 

If we are at any time unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our liabilities when payment is due, we may be required to attempt to renegotiate the terms of the instruments relating to the liabilities, seek to refinance all or a portion of the liabilities or obtain financing. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully renegotiate such terms, that any such refinancing would be possible or that any additional financing could be obtained on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us.

 

We may not be able to raise the capital necessary to fund our operations.

 

Since inception, we have funded our operations through debt and equity financings, including the exercise of warrants and options in 2013, the underwritten public offering in July 2013, as well as the senior term debt agreement in March 2015. However, our prospects for obtaining additional financing are uncertain. Additional capital may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all.  If financing is available, it may not be sufficient for us to continue as a going concern and it may be on terms that adversely affect the interest of our existing stockholders.  In addition, future financings could result in significant dilution of existing stockholders and adversely affect the economic interests of existing stockholders.

 

19
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

We will face challenges in bringing the TearLab® Osmolarity System to market in the United States and may not succeed in executing our business plan.

 

There are numerous risks and uncertainties inherent in the development of new medical technologies. In addition to our requirement for additional capital, our ability to bring the TearLab® Osmolarity System to market in the United States and to execute our business plan successfully is subject to the following risks, among others:

 

  Our current and future clinical trials may not succeed. Clinical testing is expensive and can take longer than originally anticipated. The outcomes of clinical trials are uncertain, and failure can occur at any stage of the testing. We could encounter unexpected problems, which could result in a delay in efforts to complete clinical trials supporting our commercialization efforts.
     
  The TearLab® Osmolarity System is rated under a CLIA waiver certification which requires our customers to be certified under the CLIA waiver requirements to be reimbursed under Medicare, including certain parallel state requirements. If our customers are unwilling or unable to comply with such requirements, it could have an adverse effect on their acceptance of and on our ability to market the TearLab® Osmolarity System in the United States.
     
  Our suppliers and we will be subject to numerous FDA requirements covering the design, testing, manufacturing, quality control, labeling, advertising, promotion and export of the TearLab® Osmolarity System and other matters. If our suppliers or we fail to comply with these regulatory requirements, the TearLab® Osmolarity System could be subject to restrictions or withdrawals from the market and we could become subject to penalties.
     
  Even though we successfully obtained the sought-after FDA approvals, we may be unable to commercialize the TearLab® Osmolarity System successfully in the United States to the extent the operations are sustainable. Successful commercialization will depend on a number of factors, including, among other things, achieving widespread acceptance of the TearLab® Osmolarity System among physicians, establishing adequate sales and marketing capabilities, addressing competition effectively, the ability to obtain and enforce patents to protect proprietary rights from use by would-be competitors, key personnel retention and ensuring sufficient manufacturing capacity and inventory to support commercialization plans.

 

Our business is subject to health care industry cost-containment measures that could result in reduced sales of our TearLab® Osmolarity System.

 

Most of our customers rely on third-party payers, including government programs and private health insurance plans, to reimburse some or all of the cost of the procedures which use our TearLab® Osmolarity System. The continuing efforts of governmental authorities, insurance companies, and other health care payers to contain or reduce these costs could lead to patients being unable to obtain approval for payment from these third-party payers. If patients cannot obtain third-party payer payment approval, the use of our TearLab® Osmolarity System may decline significantly and our customers may reduce or eliminate the use of our system. The cost-containment measures that health care providers are instituting, both in the U.S. and internationally, could harm our ability to operate profitably. For example, managed care organizations have successfully negotiated volume discounts for pharmaceuticals. While this type of discount pricing does not currently exist for the medical systems we supply, if managed care or other organizations were able to affect discount pricing for such systems, it could result in lower prices to our customers from their customers and, in turn, reduce the amounts we can charge our customers for our products.

 

20
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

If we are subject to regulatory enforcement action as a result of our failure to comply with regulatory requirements, our commercial operations would be harmed.

 

While we received the 510(k) clearance and CLIA waiver that we were seeking, we will be subject to significant ongoing regulatory requirements, and if we fail to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to enforcement action by the FDA or state agencies, including:

 

  adverse publicity, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
     
  repair, replacement, refunds, recall or seizure of our product;
     
  operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
     
  delay or refusal of our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products or of new intended uses or modifications to our existing product;
     
  refusal to grant export approval for our products;
     
  withdrawing 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals that have already been granted; and
     
  criminal prosecution.

 

If the government initiated any of these enforcement actions, our business could be harmed.

 

We are required to demonstrate and maintain compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or the QSR. The QSR is a complex regulatory scheme that covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, control, manufacturing, labeling, quality assurance, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. The FDA must determine that the facilities which manufacture and assemble our products that are intended for sale in the United States, as well as the manufacturing controls and specifications for these products, are compliant with applicable regulatory requirements, including the QSR. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic unannounced inspections. The FDA has not yet inspected our facilities, and we cannot assure you that we will pass any future FDA inspection. Our failure, or the failure of our suppliers, to take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse QSR inspection could result in enforcement actions, including a public warning letter, a shutdown of our manufacturing operations, a recall of our product, civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions, which would significantly harm our available inventory and sales and cause our business to suffer.

 

If we are unable to fully comply with federal and state “fraud and abuse laws,” we could face substantial penalties, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are subject to various laws pertaining to health care fraud and abuse, including the U.S. Anti- Kickback Statute, physician self-referral laws (the “Stark Law”), the U.S. False Claims Act, the U.S. False Statements Statute, the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, and state law equivalents to these U.S. federal laws, which may not be limited to government-reimbursed items and may not contain identical exceptions. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, in some instances, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from participation in U.S. federal and state health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of operations. Any action against us for violation of these laws could have a significant impact on our business. In addition, we are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Any action against us for violation by us or our agents or distributors of this act could have a significant impact on our business.

 

21
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

If we fail to comply with contractual obligations and applicable laws and regulations governing the handling of patient identifiable medical information, we could suffer material losses or be adversely affected by exposure to material penalties and liabilities.

 

Many, if not all of our customers, are covered entities under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of August 1996 or HIPAA. As part of the operation of our business, we provide reimbursement assistance to certain of our customers and as a result we act in the capacity of a business associate with respect to any patient-identifiable medical information, or PHI, we receive in connection with these services. We and our customers must comply with a variety of requirements related to the handling of patient information, including laws and regulations protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of PHI. The provisions of HIPAA require our customers to have business associate agreements with us under which we are required to appropriately safeguard the PHI we create or receive on their behalf. Further, we and our customers are required to comply with HIPAA security regulations that require us and them to implement certain administrative, physical and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic PHI, or EPHI. We are required by regulation and contract to protect the security of EPHI that we create, receive, maintain or transmit for our customers consistent with these regulations. To comply with our regulatory and contractual obligations, we may have to reorganize processes and invest in new technologies. We also are required to train personnel regarding HIPAA requirements. If we, or any of our employees or consultants, are unable to maintain the privacy, confidentiality and security of the PHI that is entrusted to us, we and/or our customers could be subject to civil and criminal fines and sanctions and we could be found to have breached our contracts with our customers. Under the HITECH Act and recent omnibus revisions to the HIPAA regulations, we are directly subject to HIPAA’s criminal and civil penalties for breaches of our privacy and security obligations and are required to comply with security breach notification requirements. The direct applicability of the HIPAA privacy and security provisions and compliance with the notification requirements requires us to incur additional costs and may restrict our business operations.

 

Our patents may not be valid, and we may not obtain and enforce patents to protect our proprietary rights from use by would-be competitors. Companies with other patents could require us to stop using or pay to use required technology.

 

Our owned and licensed patents may not be valid, and we may not obtain and enforce patents and to maintain trade secret protection for our technology. The extent to which we are unable to do so could materially harm our business.

 

We have applied for, and intend to continue to apply for, patents relating to the TearLab® Osmolarity System and related technology and processes. Such applications may not result in the issuance of any patents, and any patents now held or that may be issued may not provide adequate protection from competition. Furthermore, it is possible that patents issued or licensed to us may be challenged successfully. In that event, if we have a preferred competitive position because of any such patents, any preferred position would be lost. If we are unable to secure or to continue to maintain a preferred position, the TearLab® Osmolarity System could become subject to competition from the sale of generic products.

 

Patents issued or licensed to us may be infringed by the products or processes of others. The cost of enforcing patent rights against infringers, if such enforcement is required, could be significant and the time demands could interfere with our normal operations. There has been substantial litigation and other proceedings regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical technology industries. We could become a party to patent litigation and other proceedings. The cost to us of any patent litigation, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our would-be competitors may sustain the costs of such litigation more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Litigation also may absorb significant management time.

 

22
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Unpatented trade secrets, improvements, confidential know-how and continuing technological innovation are important to our future scientific and commercial success. Although we attempt, and will continue to attempt, to protect our proprietary information through reliance on trade secret laws and the use of confidentiality agreements with corporate partners, collaborators, employees and consultants and other appropriate means, these measures may not effectively prevent disclosure of our proprietary information, and, in any event, others may develop independently, or obtain access to, the same or similar information.

 

Certain of our patent rights are licensed to us by third parties. If we fail to comply with the terms of these license agreements, our rights to those patents may be terminated, and we will be unable to conduct our business.

 

It is possible that a court may find us to be infringing upon validly issued patents of third parties. In that event, in addition to the cost of defending the underlying suit for infringement, we may have to pay license fees and/or damages and may be enjoined from conducting certain activities. Obtaining licenses under third-party patents can be costly, and such licenses may not be available at all.

 

We may face future product liability claims.

 

The testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of therapeutic and diagnostic products entail significant inherent risks of allegations of product liability. Our past use of the RHEO™ System and the components of the SOLX Glaucoma System in clinical trials and the commercial sale of those products may have exposed us to potential liability claims. Our use of the TearLab® Osmolarity System and its commercial sale could also expose us to liability claims. All of such claims might be made directly by patients, health care providers or others selling the products. We carry clinical trials and product liability insurance to cover certain claims that could arise, or that could have arisen, during our clinical trials or during the commercial use of our products. We currently maintain clinical trials and product liability insurance with aggregate annual coverage limits of $2,000,000. Such coverage, and any coverage obtained in the future, may be inadequate to protect us in the event of successful product liability claims, and we may not increase the amount of such insurance coverage or even renew it. A successful product liability claim could materially harm our business. In addition, substantial, complex or extended litigation could result in the incurrence of large expenditures and the diversion of significant resources.

 

We have entered into related party transactions with suppliers, creditors, stockholders, officers and other parties, each of which may have interests which conflict with those of our public stockholders.

 

We have entered into related party transactions with our suppliers, creditors, stockholders, officers and other parties, each of which may have interests which conflict with those of our public stockholders.

 

If we do not introduce new commercially successful products in a timely manner, our products may become obsolete over time, customers may not buy our products and our revenue and profitability may decline.

 

Demand for our products may change in ways we may not anticipate because of:

 

  evolving customer needs;
     
  the introduction of new products and technologies; and
     
  evolving industry standards.

 

Without the timely introduction of new commercially successful products and enhancements, our products may become obsolete over time, in which case our sales and operating results would suffer. The success of our new product offerings will depend on several factors, including our ability to:

 

  properly identify and anticipate customer needs;

 

23
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

  commercialize new products in a cost-effective and timely manner;
     
  manufacture and deliver products in sufficient volumes on time;
     
  obtain and maintain regulatory approval for such new products;
     
  differentiate our offerings from competitors’ offerings;
     
  achieve positive clinical outcomes; and
     
  provide adequate medical and/or consumer education relating to new products.

 

Moreover, innovations generally will require a substantial investment in research and development before we can determine the commercial viability of these innovations and we may not have the financial resources necessary to fund these innovations. In addition, even if we successfully develop enhancements or new generations of our products, these enhancements or new generations of products may not produce revenue in excess of the costs of development and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.

 

We rely on a limited number of suppliers of each of the key components of the TearLab® Osmolarity System and are vulnerable to fluctuations in the availability and price of our suppliers products and services.

 

We purchase each of the key components of the TearLab ® Osmolarity System from a limited number of third-party suppliers. Our suppliers may not provide the components or other products needed by us in the quantities requested, in a timely manner or at a price we are willing to pay. In the event we were unable to renew our agreements with our supplier or they were to become unable or unwilling to continue to provide important components in the required volumes and quality levels or in a timely manner, or if regulations affecting the components were to change, we would be required to identify and obtain acceptable replacement supply sources. We may not be able to obtain alternative suppliers or vendors on a timely basis, or at all, which could disrupt or delay, or halt altogether, our ability to manufacture or deliver the TearLab® Osmolarity System. If any of these events should occur, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

 

We face intense competition, and our failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

We face intense competition in the markets for ophthalmic products and these markets are subject to rapid and significant technological change. Although we have no direct competitors, we have numerous potential competitors in the United States and abroad. We face potential competition from industry participants marketing conventional technologies for the measurement of osmolarity and other in-lab testing technologies, and commercially available methods, such as the Schirmer Test and ocular surface staining. Many of our potential competitors have substantially more resources and a greater marketing scale than we do. If we are unable to develop and produce or market our products to effectively compete against our competitors, our operating results will materially suffer.

 

24
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

If we lose key personnel, or we do not attract and retain highly qualified personnel on a cost-effective basis, it would be more difficult for us to manage our existing business operations and to identify and pursue new growth opportunities.

 

Our success depends, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified scientific, clinical, manufacturing and management personnel. In addition, any difficulties in retaining key personnel or managing this growth could disrupt our operations. Future growth will require us to continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, and to continue to recruit, train and retain, additional qualified personnel, which may impose a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure. The competition for qualified personnel in the medical technology field is intense. We are highly dependent on our continued ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified management, clinical and scientific personnel.

 

Due to our limited resources, we may not effectively recruit, train and retain additional qualified personnel. If we do not retain key personnel or manage our growth effectively, we may not implement our business plan effectively.

 

Furthermore, we have not entered into non-competition agreements with our key employees. In addition, we do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our officers, employees or consultants. The loss of the services of existing personnel, the failure to recruit additional key scientific, technical and managerial personnel in a timely manner, and the loss of our employees to our competitors would harm our research and development programs and our business.

 

If we fail to establish and maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis could be impaired, which would adversely affect our consolidated operating results, our ability to operate our business and our stock price.

 

Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Failure on our part to maintain effective internal financial and accounting controls would cause our financial reporting to be unreliable, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows, and could cause the trading price of our common stock to fall dramatically.

 

Maintaining proper and effective internal controls will require substantial management time and attention and may result in our incurring substantial incremental expenses, including with respect to increasing the breadth and depth of our finance organization to ensure that we have personnel with the appropriate qualifications and training in certain key accounting roles and adherence to certain control disciplines within the accounting and reporting function. Any failure in internal controls or any errors or delays in our financial reporting would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and could have a substantial adverse impact on the trading price of our common stock.

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our management does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Our management has identified control deficiencies in the past and may identify additional deficiencies in the future.

 

We cannot be certain that the actions we are taking to improve our internal controls over financial reporting will be sufficient or that any changes processes and procedures can be completed in a timely manner. In future periods, if the process required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 reveals material weaknesses or significant deficiencies, the correction of any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies could require additional remedial measures which could be costly and time-consuming. In addition, we may be unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis. Any of the foregoing could cause investors to lose confidence in the reliability of our consolidated financial statements, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and make it more difficult for us to finance our operations and growth.

 

25
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

We may need to raise additional capital in the future. Such capital may not be available to us on reasonable terms, if at all, when or as we require additional funding. If we issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that may be convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, our common stock, our existing stockholders, would experience further dilution.

 

We expect that we will seek to raise additional capital from time to time in the future. Such financings may involve the issuance of debt, equity and/or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our equity securities. These financings may not be available to us on reasonable terms or at all when and as we require funding. Any failure to obtain additional working capital when required would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition, our ability to continue as a going concern and would be expected to result in a decline in our stock price. If we consummate such financings, the terms of such financings may adversely affect the interests of our existing stockholders. Any issuances of our common stock, preferred stock, or securities such as warrants or notes that are convertible into, exercisable or exchangeable for, our capital stock, would have a dilutive effect on the voting and economic interest of our existing stockholders.

 

Our financial results may vary significantly from year-to-year due to a number of factors, which may lead to volatility in the trading price of our common stock.

 

Our annual revenue and results of operations have varied in the past and may continue to vary significantly from year-to-year. The variability in our annual results of operations may lead to volatility in our stock price as research analysts and investors respond to these annual fluctuations. These fluctuations are due to numerous factors that are difficult to forecast, including:

 

  fluctuations in demand for our products;
     
  changes in customer budget cycles and capital spending;
     
  seasonal variations in customer operations that could occur during holiday or summer vacation periods;
     
  tendencies among some customers to defer purchase decisions to the end of the quarter;
     
  the large unit value of our systems;
     
  changes in our pricing and sales policies or the pricing and sales policies of our competitors;
     
  our ability to design, manufacture and deliver products to our customers in a timely and cost effective manner;
     
  quality control or yield problems in our manufacturing operations;
     
  our ability to timely obtain adequate quantities of the components used in our products;
     
  new product introductions and enhancements by us and our competitors;
     
  unanticipated increases in costs or expenses;
     
  our complex, variable and, at times, lengthy sales cycle;
     
  global economic conditions; and
     
  fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

In addition, we may experience seasonal variations in our customer operations such as could occur during holiday vacation periods. For example, one of our principal target markets consists of private ophthalmic and optometric practices, and our operating results in the quarter ending September 30 of each fiscal year could be adversely affected by summer vacation periods. The foregoing factors, as well as other factors, could materially and adversely affect our quarterly and annual results of operations. In addition, a significant amount of our operating expenses are relatively fixed due to our manufacturing, research and development, and sales and general administrative efforts. Any failure to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for a revenue shortfall could magnify the adverse impact of such revenue shortfall on our results of operations. We expect that our sales will continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis and our financial results for some periods may differ from those projected by securities analysts, which could significantly decrease the price of our common stock.

 

26
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile.

 

The market prices for, and the trading volumes of, securities of medical device companies, such as ours, have been historically volatile. The market has experienced, from time to time, significant price and volume fluctuations unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The market price of our common shares may fluctuate significantly due to a variety of factors, including:

 

  the results of pre-clinical testing and clinical trials by us, our collaborators and/or our competitors;
     
  technological innovations or new diagnostic products;
     
  governmental regulations;
     
  developments in patent or other proprietary rights;
     
  litigation;
     
  public concern regarding the safety of products developed by us or others;
     
  comments by securities analysts;
     
  the issuance of additional shares to obtain financing or for acquisitions;
     
  general market conditions in our industry or in the economy as a whole; and
     
  political instability, natural disasters, war and/or events of terrorism.

 

In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of individual companies. Broad market and industry factors may seriously affect the market price of our stock, regardless of actual operating performance. In the past, securities class action litigation often follows periods of volatility in the overall market and market price of a particular company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

 

Because we do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock, stockholders will benefit from an investment in our common stock only if it appreciates in value.

 

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention to pay any dividends in the future. We are not profitable and may not earn sufficient revenues to meet all operating cash needs for at least several years, if at all. As a result, we intend to use all available cash and liquid assets in the development of our business. Any future determination about the payment of dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our earnings, if any, our capital requirements, our operating and financial conditions and on such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. As a result, the success of an investment in our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in its value. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares.

 

27
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

Warrant holders will not be entitled to any of the rights of common stockholders, but will be subject to all changes made with respect thereto.

 

If you hold warrants, you will not be entitled to any rights with respect to our common stock (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to receive any dividends or other distributions on our common stock), but you will be subject to all changes affecting our common stock. You will have rights with respect to our common stock only if you receive our common stock upon exercise of the warrants and only as of the date when you become a record owner of the shares of our common stock upon such exercise. For example, if a proposed amendment to our charter or bylaws requires stockholder approval and the record date for determining the stockholders of record entitled to vote on the amendment occurs prior to the date that you are deemed to be the owner of the shares of our common stock due upon exercise of your warrants, you will not be entitled to vote on the amendment; although, you will nevertheless be subject to any changes in the powers, preferences or special rights of our common stock.

 

We can issue shares of preferred stock that may adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock.

 

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with designations, rights, and preferences determined from time to time by our board of directors. Accordingly, our board of directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights superior to those of holders of our common stock. For example, an issuance of shares of preferred stock could:

 

  adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common stock;
     
  make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of us;
     
  discourage bids for our common stock at a premium;
     
  limit or eliminate any payments that the holders of our common stock could expect to receive upon our liquidation; or
     
  otherwise adversely affect the market price or our common stock.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

 

As further consideration for the amendment to the CRG loan agreement and as a condition to the Company drawing down the second tranche under the CRG loan agreement of $10.0 million, the Company has agreed to issue the lenders under the CRG loan agreement warrants to purchase an aggregate of 350,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock of the Company and with a five year term from the date of issuance of such warrants. Such warrants would be issued by the Company at such time that the Company draws down the second tranche under the CRG loan agreement of $10.0 million. Such warrants would be issued to such lenders pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) afforded by Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Such warrants would not be registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold absent registration, or an applicable exemption from registration, under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

 

None.

 

28
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

Number

  Exhibit Description   Incorporated by Reference
         
3.1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant currently in effect.   Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 9, 2008 (file no. 000-51030)
         
3.2   Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant currently in effect.   Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A No. 3, filed with the Commission on November 16, 2004 (file no. 333-118024)
         
3.3   Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.   Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 9, 2008 (file no. 000-51030)
         
3.4   Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.   Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 19, 2010 (file no. 000-51030)
         
3.5   Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.   Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 filed with the Commission on July 15, 2013 (file no. 333-189372)
         
10.1#   2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended   Filed herewith
         
10.2#   2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.   Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 13, 2014 (file no. 000-51030)
         
10.3#  

Amendment 2 to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2015, by and among TearLab Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries from time to time party thereto as guarantors and CRG LP (formerly known as Capital Royalty) and certain of its affiliate funds, as lenders

  Filed herewith
         
31.1   CEO’s Certification required by Rule 13A-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  

Filed herewith

         
31.2   CFO’s Certification required by Rule 13A-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   Filed herewith
         
32.1+   CEO’s Certification of periodic financial reports pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. Section 1350.   Furnished herewith
         
32.2+   CFO’s Certification of periodic financial reports pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. Section 1350.  

Furnished herewith

         
101.INS*   XBRL Instance  

Filed herewith

         
101.SCH*   XBRL Taxonomy Schema  

Filed herewith

         
101.CAL*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation   Filed herewith
         
101.DEF*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition  

Filed herewith

         
101.LAB*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels   Filed herewith
         
101.PRE*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation   Filed herewith

 

# Management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

 

* XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section.

 

+ In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release No. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certifications furnished pursuant to this item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

29
 

 

TearLab Corporation

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  TearLab Corp.
  (Registrant)
   
Date: August 7, 2015 /s/ Elias Vamvakas
  Elias Vamvakas
  Chief Executive Officer
   
Date: August 7, 2015

/s/ Wes Brazell

  Wes Brazell
 

Chief Financial Officer

 

30
 

 

 

TEARLAB CORPORATION

 

(formerly OCCULOGIX, INC. and formerly VASCULAR SCIENCES CORPORATION)

 

2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE AS OF FEBRUARY 5, 2015

 

1. Establishment, Purpose and Term of Plan .

 

1.1 Establishment . The TearLab Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”) was originally established effective as of the effective date of the Delaware reincorporation of OccuLogix Corporation (the predecessor corporation to the Company) on June 5, 2002 (the “ Original Effective Date ”), and is hereby amended and restated effective as of February 5, 2015 (the “ Effective Date ”).

 

1.2 Purpose . The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Participating Company Group and its stockholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain and reward persons performing services for the Participating Company Group and by motivating such persons to contribute to the growth and profitability of the Participating Company Group.

 

1.3 Term of Plan . The Plan shall continue in effect until the earlier of its termination by the Board or the date on which all of the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan have been issued and all restrictions on such shares under the terms of the Plan and the agreements evidencing Awards granted under the Plan have lapsed. However, all Awards shall be granted, if at all, within ten (10) years from February 5, 2015.

 

2. Definitions and Construction .

 

2.1 Definitions . Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have their respective meanings set forth below:

 

(a) “ Award ” means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.

 

(b) “ Award Agreement ” means the written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to each Award granted under the Plan. The Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

 

(c) “ Board ” means the Board of Directors of the Company. If one or more Committees have been appointed by the Board to administer the Plan, “Board” also means such Committee(s).

 

(d) “ Code ” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.

 

(e) “ Committee ” means the Compensation Committee or other committee of the Board duly appointed to administer the Plan and having such powers as shall be specified by the Board. Unless the powers of the Committee have been specifically limited, the Committee shall have all of the powers of the Board granted herein, including, without limitation, the power to amend or terminate the Plan at any time, subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable limitations imposed by law.

 

(f) “ Company ” means TearLab Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or any successor corporation thereto.

 

 
 

 

(g) “ Consultant ” means any natural person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or a Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation to render bona fide services to such entity, provided the services (i) are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and (ii) do not directly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities, in each case, within the meaning of Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities Act, and provided, further, that a Consultant will include only those persons to whom the issuance of shares of Stock may be registered under Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities Act.

 

(h) “ Director ” means a member of the Board or of the board of directors of any other Participating Company.

 

(i) “ Disability ” means the inability of the Participant, in the opinion of a qualified physician acceptable to the Company, to perform the major duties of the Participant’s position with the Participating Company Group because of the sickness or injury of the Participant.

 

(j) “ Employee ” means any person treated as an employee (including an Officer or a Director who is also treated as an employee) in the records of a Participating Company and, with respect to any Incentive Stock Option granted to such person, who is an employee for purposes of Section 422 of the Code; provided, however, that neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee shall be sufficient to constitute employment for purposes of the Plan. The Company shall determine in good faith and in the exercise of its discretion whether an individual has become or has ceased to be an Employee and the effective date of such individual’s employment or termination of employment, as the case may be. For purposes of an individual’s rights, if any, under the Plan as of the time of the Company’s determination, all such determinations by the Company shall be final, binding and conclusive, notwithstanding that the Company or any court of law or governmental agency subsequently makes a contrary determination.

 

(k) “ Exchange Act ” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

(l) “ Fair Market Value ” means, as of any date, the value of a share of Stock or other property as determined by the Board, in its discretion, or by the Company, in its discretion, if such determination is expressly allocated to the Company herein, subject to the following:

 

(i) If, on such date, the Stock is listed on a national or regional securities exchange or market system, the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be the closing price of a share of Stock (or the mean of the closing bid and asked prices of a share of Stock if the Stock is so quoted instead) as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market, The Nasdaq SmallCap Market or such other national or regional securities exchange or market system constituting the primary market for the Stock, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Company deems reliable. If the relevant date does not fall on a day on which the Stock has traded on such securities exchange or market system, the date on which the Fair Market Value shall be established shall be the last day on which the Stock was so traded prior to the relevant date, or such other appropriate day as shall be determined by the Board, in its discretion.

 

(ii) If, on such date, the Stock is not listed on a national or regional securities exchange or market system, the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be as determined by the Board in good faith without regard to any restriction other than a restriction which, by its terms, will never lapse.

 

(m) “ Incentive Stock Option ” means an Option intended to be (as set forth in the Award Agreement) and which qualifies as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Code.

 

(n) “ Insider ” means an Officer, a Director of the Company or other person whose transactions in Stock are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

 

(o) “ Involuntary Termination ” means the termination of the Service of any individual which occurs by reason of:

 

- 2 -
 

 

(i) Such individual’s involuntary dismissal or discharge by the Company for reasons other than Misconduct, or

 

(ii) Such individual’s voluntary resignation following (A) a change in his or her position with the Company which materially reduces his or her duties and responsibilities or the level of management to which he or she reports, (B) a reduction in his or her level of compensation (including base salary, fringe benefits and target bonus under any corporate-performance based bonus or incentive programs) by more than fifteen percent (15%) or (C) a relocation of such individual’s place of employment by more than fifty (50) miles, provided and only if such change, reduction or relocation is effected without the individual’s consent.

 

(p) “ Misconduct ” means the commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty by the Participant, any unauthorized use or disclosure by such person of confidential information or trade secrets of the Company (or any Participating Company), or any other intentional misconduct by such person adversely affecting the business or affairs of the Company (or any Participating Company) in a material manner. The foregoing definition shall not in any way preclude or restrict the right of the Company (or any Participating Company) to discharge or dismiss any Participant or other person in the Service of the Company (or any Participating Company) for any other acts or omissions, but such other acts or omissions shall not be deemed, for purposes of the Plan, to constitute grounds for termination for Misconduct.

 

(q) “ Nonstatutory Stock Option ” means an Option not intended to be (as set forth in the Award Agreement) or which does not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.

 

(r) “ Officer ” means any person designated by the Board as an officer of the Company.

 

(s) “ Option ” means a right to purchase Stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Plan. An Option may be either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option.

 

(t) “ Parent Corporation ” means any present or future “parent corporation” of the Company, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.

 

(u) “ Participant ” means the holder of an outstanding Award.

 

(v) “ Participating Company ” means the Company or any Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation.

 

(w) “ Participating Company Group ” means, at any point in time, all corporations collectively which are then Participating Companies.

 

(x) “ Performance Goals ” means the goal(s) determined by the Committee (in its discretion) to be applicable to a Participant with respect to an Award. As determined by the Committee, the Performance Goals applicable to an Award may provide for a targeted level or levels of achievement using one or more of the following measures: (i) revenue, (ii) gross margin, (iii) operating margin, (iv) operating income, (v) pre-tax profit, (vi) pre-tax margin, (vii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, (viii) net income, (ix) cash flow, (x) operating expenses, (xi) the market price of Stock, (xii) earnings per share, (xiii) earnings yield, (xiv) earnings yield spread, (xv) total stockholder return, (xvi) return on capital, (xvii) return on assets, (xviii) product quality, (xix) economic value added, (xx) number of customers, (xxi) market share, (xxii) return on investments, (xxiii) profit after taxes, (xxiv) customer satisfaction, (xxv) business divestitures and acquisitions, (xxvi) supplier awards from significant customers, (xxvii) new product development, (xxviii) working capital, (xxix) time to market, (xxx) return on net assets, and (xxxi) sales. The Performance Goals may differ from Participant to Participant and from Award to Award. Any criteria used may be measured, as applicable, (i) in absolute terms, (ii) in relative terms (including, but not limited to, passage of time and/or against another company or companies), (iii) on a per-share basis, (iv) against the performance of the Company as a whole or a segment of the Company, and (v) on a pre-tax or after-tax basis.

 

- 3 -
 

 

(y) “ Period of Restriction ” means the period during which the transfer of shares of Restricted Stock are subject to restrictions and therefore, the shares of Stock are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Such restrictions may be based on Performance Goals, the passage of time, the achievement of target levels of performance, or the occurrence of other events as determined by the Board.

 

(z) “ Restricted Stock ” means shares of Stock issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award under Section 8 of the Plan.

 

(aa) “ Restricted Stock Unit ” means a bookkeeping entry representing the right to receive one share of Stock under Section 9 of the Plan. Each Restricted Stock Unit represents an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company.

 

(bb) “ Rule 16b-3 ” means Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor rule or regulation.

 

(cc) “ Securities Act ” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

(dd) “ Service ” means a Participant’s employment or service with the Participating Company Group, whether in the capacity of an Employee, a Director or a Consultant. A Participant’s Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Participant renders Service to the Participating Company Group or a change in the Participating Company for which the Participant renders such Service, provided that there is no interruption or termination of the Participant’s Service. Furthermore, a Participant’s Service with the Participating Company Group shall not be deemed to have terminated if the Participant takes any military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence approved by the Company; provided, however, that (i) if any such leave exceeds three (3) months, then three (3) months following the first (1st) day of such leave the Participant’s Service shall be deemed to have terminated unless the Participant’s right to return to Service with the Participating Company Group is guaranteed by statute or contract and (ii) for purposes of Incentive Stock Options, if reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company is not guaranteed by statute or contract and exceeds three (3) months, then six (6) months following the first (1st) day of such leave, any Incentive Stock Option held by the Participant will cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and will be treated for tax purposes as a Nonstatutory Stock Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise designated by the Company or required by law, a leave of absence shall not be treated as Service for purposes of determining vesting under the Participant’s Award Agreement. The Participant’s Service shall be deemed to have terminated either upon an actual termination of Service or upon the corporation for which the Participant performs Service ceasing to be a Participating Company. Subject to the foregoing, the Company, in its discretion, shall determine whether the Participant’s Service has terminated and the effective date of such termination.

 

(ee) “ Stock ” means the common stock of the Company, as adjusted from time to time in accordance with Section 4.2.

 

(ff) “ Stock Appreciation Right ” means a right to surrender to the Company all or a portion of an Option in exchange for an amount equal to the excess, if any, of: (i) the Fair Market Value as of the date such Option or portion thereof is surrendered of the Stock issuable on exercise of such Option or portion thereof over (ii) the exercise price of such Option or portion thereof relating to such stock.

 

(gg) “ Subsidiary Corporation ” means any present or future “subsidiary corporation” of the Company, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

 

(hh) “ Ten Percent Owner ” means a Participant who, at the time an Option is granted to the Participant, owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of a Participating Company within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code.

 

- 4 -
 

 

2.2 Construction . Captions and titles contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of the Plan. Except when otherwise indicated by the context, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. Use of the term “or” is not intended to be exclusive, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Where a Stock Appreciation Right has been granted in conjunction with an Option, the term “Option” shall include the related Stock Appreciation Right where the context permits.

 

3. Administration .

 

3.1 Administration by the Board . The Plan shall be administered by the Board. All questions of interpretation of the Plan or of any Award shall be determined by the Board, and such determinations shall be final and binding upon all persons having an interest in the Plan or such Award.

 

3.2 Authority of Officers . Any Officer shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Company with respect to any matter, right, obligation, determination or election which is the responsibility of or which is allocated to the Company herein, provided the Officer has apparent authority with respect to such matter, right, obligation, determination or election.

 

3.3 Powers of the Board . In addition to any other powers set forth in the Plan and subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have the full and final power and authority, in its discretion:

 

(a) to determine the persons to whom, and the time or times at which, Awards shall be granted and the number of shares of Stock to be subject to each Award;

 

(b) to designate Options as Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options;

 

(c) to determine the Fair Market Value of shares of Stock or other property;

 

(d) to determine the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to each Award (which need not be identical) and any shares acquired upon the exercise thereof, including, without limitation, (i) the exercise price of the Award, (ii) the method of payment for shares purchased upon the exercise of the Award, (iii) the method for satisfaction of any tax withholding obligation arising in connection with the Award, including by the withholding or delivery of shares of stock, (iv) the timing, terms and conditions of the exercisability of the Award or the vesting of any shares acquired upon the exercise thereof, (v) the time of the expiration of the Award, (vi) the effect of the Participant’s termination of Service with the Participating Company Group on any of the foregoing, and (vii) all other terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to the Award or such shares not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan;

 

(e) to approve one or more forms of Award Agreement;

 

(f) to amend, modify, extend, cancel, or renew any outstanding Award or to waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any outstanding Award or any shares acquired upon the exercise thereof;

 

(g) to accelerate, continue, extend or defer the exercisability of any Award or the vesting of any shares acquired upon the exercise thereof, including with respect to the period following a Participant’s termination of Service with the Participating Company Group;

 

(h) to prescribe, amend or rescind rules, guidelines and policies relating to the Plan, or to adopt supplements to, or alternative versions of, the Plan, including, without limitation, as the Board deems necessary or desirable to comply with the laws of, or to accommodate the tax policy or custom of, foreign jurisdictions whose citizens may be granted Awards; and

 

(i) to correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement and to make all other determinations and take such other actions with respect to the Plan or any Award as the Board may deem advisable to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan or applicable law.

 

- 5 -
 

 

3.4 Administration with Respect to Insiders . With respect to participation by Insiders in the Plan, at any time that any class of equity security of the Company is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the Plan shall be administered in compliance with the requirements, if any, of Rule 16b-3.

 

3.5 Indemnification . In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or officers or employees of the Participating Company Group, members of the Board and any officers or employees of the Participating Company Group to whom authority to act for the Board or the Company is delegated shall be indemnified by the Company against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any right granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct in duties; provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after the institution of such action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunity at its own expense to handle and defend the same.

 

4. Shares Subject to Plan .

 

4.1 Maximum Number of Shares Issuable . Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be seven million two hundred thousand (7,200,000). This share reserve shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any combination thereof. If an outstanding Award for any reason expires, is forfeited, or is terminated or canceled or if shares of Stock are acquired upon the exercise of an Award subject to a Company repurchase option and are repurchased by the Company at the Participant’s exercise price, the shares of Stock allocable to the unexercised portion of such Award or repurchased, forfeited or cancelled shares of Stock shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. However, except as adjusted pursuant to Section 4.2, in no event shall more than seven million two hundred thousand (7,200,000) shares of Stock be available for issuance pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options (the “ ISO Share Issuance Limit ”).

 

4.2 Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure . In the event of any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of Stock, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of shares of Stock or other securities of the Company, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the shares of Stock, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the number and class of shares subject to the Plan and to any outstanding Awards, in the ISO Share Issuance Limit set forth in Section 4.1, and in the exercise price per share of any outstanding Awards. If a majority of the shares which are of the same class as the shares that are subject to outstanding Awards are exchanged for, converted into, or otherwise become (whether or not pursuant to an Ownership Change Event, as defined in Section 11.1) shares of another corporation (the “ New Shares ”), the Board may unilaterally amend the outstanding Awards to provide that such Awards are exercisable for New Shares. In the event of any such amendment, the number of shares subject to, and the exercise price per share of, the outstanding Awards shall be adjusted in a fair and equitable manner as determined by the Board, in its discretion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any fractional share resulting from an adjustment pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and in no event may the exercise price of any Award be decreased to an amount less than the par value, if any, of the stock subject to the Award. The adjustments determined by the Board pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be final, binding and conclusive.

 

5. Eligibility and Award Limitations .

 

5.1 Persons Eligible for Awards . Awards may be granted only to Employees, Consultants, and Directors. Eligible persons may be granted more than one (1) Award. However, eligibility in accordance with this Section shall not entitle any person to be granted an Award, or, having been granted an Award, to be granted an additional Award.

 

- 6 -
 

 

5.2 Option Grant Restrictions . Any person who is not an Employee on the effective date of the grant of an Option to such person may be granted only a Nonstatutory Stock Option.

 

5.3 Fair Market Value Limitation . To the extent that options designated as Incentive Stock Options (granted under all stock option plans of the Participating Company Group, including the Plan) become exercisable by a Participant for the first time during any calendar year for stock having a Fair Market Value greater than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), the portions of such options which exceed such amount shall be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options. For purposes of this Section 5.3, options designated as Incentive Stock Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted, and the Fair Market Value of stock shall be determined as of the time the option with respect to such stock is granted. If the Code is amended to provide for a different limitation from that set forth in this Section 5.3, such different limitation shall be deemed incorporated herein effective as of the date and with respect to such Options as required or permitted by such amendment to the Code. If an Option is treated as an Incentive Stock Option in part and as a Nonstatutory Stock Option in part by reason of the limitation set forth in this Section 5.3, the Participant may designate which portion of such Option the Participant is exercising. In the absence of such designation, the Participant shall be deemed to have exercised the Incentive Stock Option portion of the Option first. Separate certificates representing each such portion shall be issued upon the exercise of the Option.

 

6. Terms and Conditions of Options .

 

Options shall be evidenced by Option Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock covered thereby, in such form as the Board shall from time to time establish. No Option or purported Option shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Option Agreement. Option Agreements may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

 

6.1 Exercise Price . The exercise price for each Option shall be established in the discretion of the Board; provided, however, that (a) the exercise price per share for an Incentive Stock Option shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option, (b) the exercise price per share for a Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option, and (c) no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Owner shall have an exercise price per share less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option (whether an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option) may be granted with an exercise price lower than the minimum exercise price set forth above if such Option is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another option in a manner qualifying under the provisions of Section 424(a) of the Code.

 

6.2 Exercisability and Term of Options . Options shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions as shall be determined by the Board and set forth in the Option Agreement evidencing such Option; provided, however, that (a) no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such Option and (b) no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Owner shall be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years after the effective date of grant of such Option. Subject to the foregoing, unless otherwise specified by the Board in the grant of an Option, any Option granted hereunder shall terminate ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of the Option, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its provisions.

 

6.3 Payment of Exercise Price .

 

(a) Forms of Consideration Authorized . Except as otherwise provided below, payment of the exercise price for the number of shares of Stock being purchased pursuant to any Option shall be made (i) in cash, by check or cash equivalent, (ii) by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Stock owned by the Participant having a Fair Market Value not less than the exercise price, (iii) by delivery of a properly executed notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker providing for the assignment to the Company of the proceeds of a sale or loan with respect to some or all of the shares being acquired upon the exercise of the Option (including, without limitation, through an exercise complying with the provisions of Regulation T as promulgated from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) (a “ Cashless Exercise ”), (iv) by such other consideration as may be approved by the Board from time to time to the extent permitted by applicable law, or (v) by any combination thereof. The Board may at any time or from time to time, by approval of or by amendment to the standard forms of Option Agreement described in Section 10, or by other means, grant Options which do not permit all of the foregoing forms of consideration to be used in payment of the exercise price or which otherwise restrict one or more forms of consideration.

 

- 7 -
 

 

(b) Limitations on Forms of Consideration .

 

(i) Tender of Stock . Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option may not be exercised by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Stock to the extent such tender or attestation would constitute a violation of the provisions of any law, regulation or agreement restricting the redemption of the Company’s stock. Unless otherwise provided by the Board, an Option may not be exercised by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Stock unless such shares either have been owned by the Participant for more than six (6) months (and not used for another Option exercise by attestation during such period) or were not acquired, directly or indirectly, from the Company.

 

(ii) Cashless Exercise . The Company reserves, at any and all times, the right, in the Company’s sole and absolute discretion, to establish, decline to approve or terminate any program or procedures for the exercise of Options by means of a Cashless Exercise.

 

(iii) Payment by Promissory Note . No promissory note shall be permitted if the exercise of an Option using a promissory note would be a violation of any law. Any permitted promissory note shall be on such terms as the Board shall determine. The Board shall have the authority to permit or require the Participant to secure any promissory note used to exercise an Option with the shares of Stock acquired upon the exercise of the Option or with other collateral acceptable to the Company. Unless otherwise provided by the Board, if the Company at any time is subject to the regulations promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other governmental entity affecting the extension of credit in connection with the Company’s securities, any promissory note shall comply with such applicable regulations, and the Participant shall pay the unpaid principal and accrued interest, if any, to the extent necessary to comply with such applicable regulations.

 

6.4 Repurchase Rights . Shares issued under the Plan may be subject to a right of first refusal, one or more repurchase options, or other conditions and restrictions as determined by the Board in its discretion at the time the Option is granted. The Company shall have the right to assign at any time any repurchase right it may have, whether or not such right is then exercisable, to one or more persons as may be selected by the Company. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Stock hereunder and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.

 

6.5 Effect of Termination of Service .

 

(a) Option Exercisability . Subject to earlier termination of the Option as otherwise provided herein and unless otherwise provided by the Board in the grant of an Option and set forth in the Option Agreement, an Option shall be exercisable after a Participant’s termination of Service only during the applicable time period determined in accordance with this Section 6.6 and thereafter shall terminate:

 

(i) Disability . If the Participant’s Service terminates because of the Disability of the Participant, the Option, to the extent unexercised and exercisable on the date on which the Participant’s Service terminated, may be exercised by the Participant (or the Participant’s guardian or legal representative) at any time prior to the expiration of twelve (12) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Board, in its discretion) after the date on which the Participant’s Service terminated, but in any event no later than the date of expiration of the Option’s term as set forth in the Option Agreement evidencing such Option (the “ Option Expiration Date ”).

 

- 8 -
 

 

(ii) Death . If the Participant’s Service terminates because of the death of the Participant, the Option, to the extent unexercised and exercisable on the date on which the Participant’s Service terminated, may be exercised by the Participant’s legal representative or other person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by reason of the Participant’s death at any time prior to the expiration of twelve (12) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Board, in its discretion) after the date on which the Participant’s Service terminated, but in any event no later than the Option Expiration Date. The Participant’s Service shall be deemed to have terminated on account of death if the Participant dies within three (3) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Board, in its discretion) after the Participant’s termination of Service.

 

(iii) Other Termination of Service . If the Participant’s Service terminates for any reason, except Disability or death, the Option, to the extent unexercised and exercisable by the Participant on the date on which the Participant’s Service terminated, may be exercised by the Participant at any time prior to the expiration of three (3) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Board, in its discretion) after the date on which the Participant’s Service terminated, but in any event no later than the Option Expiration Date.

 

(b) Extension if Exercise Prevented by Law . Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the exercise of an Option within the applicable time periods set forth in Section 6.6(a) is prevented by the provisions of Section 11 below, the Option shall remain exercisable until three (3) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Board, in its discretion) after the date the Participant is notified by the Company that the Option is exercisable, but in any event no later than the Option Expiration Date.

 

(c) Extension if Participant Subject to Section 16(b) . Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a sale within the applicable time periods set forth in Section 6.6(a) of shares acquired upon the exercise of the Option would subject the Participant to suit under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, the Option shall remain exercisable until the earliest to occur of (i) the tenth (10th) day following the date on which a sale of such shares by the Participant would no longer be subject to such suit, (ii) the one hundred and ninetieth (190th) day after the Participant’s termination of Service, or (iii) the Option Expiration Date.

 

(d) Extension during Blackout Period . Notwithstanding the foregoing, if there is in effect during the applicable time periods set forth in Section 6.6(a) a Company-imposed trading blackout to which the Participant is subject (including a Participant that is an Insider) and provided that neither Section 6.6(b) nor Section 6.6(c) is applicable to the circumstances at hand, the Option shall remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) the end of the tenth business day following the end of the trading blackout or (ii) the Option Expiration Date.

 

6.6 Transferability of Options . During the lifetime of the Participant, an Option shall be exercisable only by the Participant or the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. No Option shall be assignable or transferable by the Participant, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent permitted by the Board, in its discretion, and set forth in the Option Agreement evidencing such Option, a Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be assignable or transferable subject to the applicable limitations, if any, described in the General Instructions to Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act.

 

7. Terms and Conditions of Stock Appreciation Rights .

 

7.1 Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights . The Committee may, from time to time, grant Stock Appreciation Rights to any Participant in connection with the grant of any Option. Any such grant of Stock Appreciation Rights shall be included in the Option Agreement.

 

7.2 Specific Terms of Stock Appreciation Rights . Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable only at the same time, by the same person and to the same extent, that the Option related thereto is exercisable. Upon exercise of any Stock Appreciation Right, the corresponding portion of the related Option shall be surrendered to the Company.

 

7.3 Exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights . The Company has the absolute right, at any time and from time to time, to require a Participant to exercise an Option in lieu of the related Stock Appreciation Right.

 

- 9 -
 

 

8. Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock .

 

8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock . Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Board, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Employees, Consultants or Directors in such amounts as the Board, in its sole discretion, will determine.

 

8.2 Restricted Stock Agreement . Each Award of Restricted Stock will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will specify the Period of Restriction, the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted, and such other terms and conditions as the Board, in its sole discretion, will determine. Unless the Board determines otherwise, the Company as escrow agent will hold shares of Restricted Stock until the restrictions on such shares of Restricted Stock have lapsed.

 

8.3 Transferability . Except as provided in this Section 8 or the Award Agreement, shares of Restricted Stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction.

 

8.4 Other Restrictions . The Board, in its sole discretion, may impose such other restrictions on shares of Restricted Stock as it may deem advisable or appropriate.

 

8.5 Removal of Restrictions . Except as otherwise provided in this Section 8, shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant made under the Plan will be released from escrow as soon as practicable after the last day of the Period of Restriction or at such other time as the Board may determine. The Board, in its discretion, may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.

 

8.6 Voting Rights . During the Period of Restriction, Participants holding shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights with respect to those shares of Restricted Stock, unless the Board determines otherwise.

 

8.7 Dividends and Other Distributions . During the Period of Restriction, Participants holding shares of Restricted Stock will be entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to such shares of Restricted Stock, unless the Board provides otherwise. If any such dividends or distributions are paid in shares of Stock, the shares of Stock will be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid.

 

8.8 Return of Restricted Stock to Company . On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, the Restricted Stock for which restrictions have not lapsed will revert to the Company and again will become available for grant under the Plan.

 

9. Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Units .

 

9.1 Grant . Restricted Stock Units may be granted at any time and from time to time as determined by the Board. After the Board determines that it will grant Restricted Stock Units under the Plan, it will advise the Participant in an Award Agreement of the terms, conditions, and restrictions related to the grant, including the number of Restricted Stock Units.

 

9.2 Vesting Criteria and Other Terms . The Board will set vesting criteria in its discretion, which, depending on the extent to which the criteria are met, will determine the number of Restricted Stock Units that will be paid out to the Participant. The Board may set vesting criteria based upon the achievement of Performance Goals, Company-wide, business unit, or individual goals (including, but not limited to, continued employment), or any other basis determined by the Board in its discretion.

 

9.3 Earning Restricted Stock Units . Upon meeting the applicable vesting criteria, the Participant will be entitled to receive a payout as determined by the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time after the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Board, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any vesting criteria that must be met to receive a payout.

 

- 10 -
 

 

9.4 Form and Timing of Payment . Payment of earned Restricted Stock Units will be made as soon as practicable after the date(s) determined by the Board and set forth in the Award Agreement. The Board, in its sole discretion, may only settle earned Restricted Stock Units in cash, shares of Stock, or a combination of both.

 

9.5 Cancellation . On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, all unearned Restricted Stock Units will be forfeited to the Company.

 

10. Standard Forms of Award Agreement .

 

10.1 Award Agreement . Unless otherwise provided by the Board at the time the Award is granted, an Award shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the form of Award Agreement approved by the Board concurrently with its adoption of the Plan and as amended from time to time.

 

10.2 Authority to Vary Terms . The Board shall have the authority from time to time to vary the terms of any standard form of Award Agreement described in this Section 10 either in connection with the grant or amendment of an individual Award or in connection with the authorization of a new standard form or forms; provided, however, that the terms and conditions of any such new, revised or amended standard form or forms of Award Agreement are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.

 

11. Change in Control .

 

11.1 Definitions .

 

(a) An “ Ownership Change Event ” shall be deemed to have occurred if any of the following occurs with respect to the Company: (i) the direct or indirect sale or exchange in a single or series of related transactions by the stockholders of the Company of more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock of the Company; (ii) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is a party; (iii) the sale, exchange, or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iv) a liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

 

(b) A “ Change in Control ” shall mean an Ownership Change Event or a series of related Ownership Change Events (collectively, a “ Transaction ”) wherein the stockholders of the Company immediately before the Transaction do not retain immediately after the Transaction, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of shares of the Company’s voting stock immediately before the Transaction, direct or indirect beneficial ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company or, in the case of a Transaction described in Section 11.1(a)(iii), the corporation or other business entity to which the assets of the Company were transferred (the “ Transferee ”), as the case may be. For purposes of the preceding sentence, indirect beneficial ownership shall include, without limitation, an interest resulting from ownership of the voting securities of one or more corporations or other business entities which own the Company or the Transferee, as the case may be, either directly or through one or more subsidiary corporations or other business entities. The Board shall have the right to determine whether multiple sales or exchanges of the voting securities of the Company or multiple Ownership Change Events are related, and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive.

 

11.2 Effect of Change in Control on Awards . In the event of a Change in Control, the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing corporation or other business entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “ Acquiring Corporation ”), may, without the consent of the Participant, either assume the Company’s rights and obligations under outstanding Awards or substitute for outstanding Awards substantially equivalent awards for the Acquiring Corporation’s stock. In the event that the Acquiring Corporation does not assume or substitute for the outstanding Awards, the Participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding Awards, including shares of Stock as to which such Awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable. Any Awards which are neither assumed or substituted for by the Acquiring Corporation in connection with the Change in Control nor exercised as of the date of the Change in Control shall terminate and cease to be outstanding effective as of the date of the Change in Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares acquired upon exercise of an Award prior to the Change in Control and any consideration received pursuant to the Change in Control with respect to such shares shall continue to be subject to all applicable provisions of the Award Agreement evidencing such Award except as otherwise provided in such Award Agreement. Furthermore, notwithstanding the foregoing, if the corporation the stock of which is subject to the outstanding Awards immediately prior to an Ownership Change Event described in Section 11.1(a)(i) constituting a Change in Control is the surviving or continuing corporation and immediately after such Ownership Change Event less than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of its voting stock is held by another corporation or by other corporations that are members of an affiliated group within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Code without regard to the provisions of Section 1504(b) of the Code, the outstanding Awards shall not terminate unless the Board otherwise provides in its discretion. Additionally, and notwithstanding anything in this Section 11.2 to the contrary, if a Participant’s Service is terminated by reason of an Involuntary Termination within eighteen (18) months following the effective date of a Change in Control in which the Acquiring Corporation assumes or substitutes for outstanding Awards, the shares of Stock subject to such Participant’s outstanding Awards will automatically accelerate and vest in full as of the Participant’s termination of Service, including shares of Stock as to which such Awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable. Any Award so accelerated shall remain exercisable until the Award’s expiration or, if earlier, the termination of the Award, as provided in the Participant’s Award Agreement.

 

- 11 -
 

 

12. Tax Withholding .

 

The Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to deduct from the shares of Stock issuable pursuant to an Award, or to accept from the Participant the tender of, a number of whole shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value, as determined by the Company, equal to all or any part of the federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld by the Participating Company Group with respect to such Award or the shares acquired pursuant thereto. Alternatively or in addition, in its discretion, the Company shall have the right to require the Participant, through payroll withholding, cash payment or otherwise, including by means of a Cashless Exercise (as applicable), to make adequate provision for any such tax withholding obligations of the Participating Company Group arising in connection with the Award or the shares acquired pursuant thereto. The Fair Market Value of any shares of Stock withheld or tendered to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations shall not exceed the amount determined by the applicable minimum statutory withholding rates. The Company shall have no obligation to deliver shares of Stock or to release shares of Stock from an escrow established pursuant to the Award Agreement until the Participating Company Group’s tax withholding obligations have been satisfied by the Participant.

 

13. Compliance With Code Section 409A .

 

Awards will be designed and operated in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Code Section 409A, except as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Board. The Plan and each Award Agreement under the Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 409A and will be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent, except as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Board. To the extent that an Award or payment, or the settlement or deferral thereof, is subject to Code Section 409A the Award will be granted, paid, settled or deferred in a manner that will meet the requirements of Code Section 409A, such that the grant, payment, settlement or deferral will not be subject to the additional tax or interest applicable under Code Section 409A.

 

14. No Effect on Employment or Service .

 

Neither the Plan nor any Award will confer upon a Participant any right with respect to continuing the Participant’s Service with the Participating Company Group, nor will they interfere in any way with the Participant’s right or the right of any Participating Company to terminate such Service at any time, with or without cause, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

 

15. Compliance with Securities Law .

 

The grant of Awards and the issuance of shares of Stock upon exercise of Awards shall be subject to compliance with all applicable requirements of federal, state and foreign law with respect to such securities. Awards may not be exercised if the issuance of shares of Stock upon exercise would constitute a violation of any applicable federal, state or foreign securities laws or other law or regulations or the requirements of any stock exchange or market system upon which the Stock may then be listed. In addition, no Award may be exercised unless (a) a registration statement under the Securities Act shall at the time of exercise of the Award be in effect with respect to the shares issuable upon exercise of the Award or (b) in the opinion of legal counsel to the Company, the shares issuable upon exercise of the Award may be issued in accordance with the terms of an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority, if any, deemed by the Company’s legal counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares hereunder shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. As a condition to the exercise of any Award, the Company may require the Participant to satisfy any qualifications that may be necessary or appropriate, to evidence compliance with any applicable law or regulation and to make any representation or warranty with respect thereto as may be requested by the Company.

 

- 12 -
 

 

16. Termination or Amendment of Plan .

 

Without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, the Board may terminate or amend the Plan at any time. However, subject to changes in applicable law, regulations or rules that would permit otherwise, without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, there shall be (a) no increase in the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan (except by operation of the provisions of Section 4.2), (b) no change in the class of persons eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options, (c) no extension of the term of an Award granted to an Insider, other than as provided for in Section 6.6(d), (d) no reduction in the exercise price of an Award granted to an Insider, other than in connection with adjustments for changes in the Company’s capital structure as permitted pursuant to Section 4.2 and (e) no other amendment of the Plan that would require approval of the Company’s stockholders under any applicable law, regulation or rule. No termination or amendment of the Plan shall adversely affect any then outstanding Award unless expressly agreed to by the affected Participant or required by applicable law, legislation or rule. In any event, no termination or amendment of the Plan may adversely affect any then outstanding Award without the consent of the Participant, unless such termination or amendment is required to enable an Award designated as an Incentive Stock Option to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option or is necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule.

 

17. Stockholder Approval .

 

The Plan or any increase in the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock issuable thereunder as provided in Section 4.1 (the “ Authorized Shares ”) shall be approved by the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months of the date of adoption thereof by the Board. Awards granted prior to stockholder approval of the Plan or in excess of the Authorized Shares previously approved by the stockholders shall become exercisable no earlier than the date of stockholder approval of the Plan or such increase in the Authorized Shares, as the case may be.

 

- 13 -
 

 

PLAN HISTORY

 

June 2002   Board of Directors of OccuLogix Corporation, a Florida corporation (“OccuLogix”) adopts Plan, with an initial reserve of Two Million Six Hundred Seventy-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-Seven (2,678,997) shares. This share reserve includes the number of shares of stock underlying outstanding options and the number of shares available for grant as options under the OccuLogix Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan. However, this share reserve, at any time, shall be reduced by the number of shares subject to Prior Plan Options.
     
June 2002   Stockholders of OccuLogix approve Plan, with an initial reserve of Two Million Six Hundred Seventy-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-Seven (2,678,997) shares. This share reserve includes the number of shares of stock underlying outstanding options and the number of shares available for grant as options under the OccuLogix Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan. However, this share reserve, at any time, shall be reduced by the number of shares subject to Prior Plan Options.
     
June 2002   Effective date of Delaware reincorporation of OccuLogix.
     
December 2004   Board of Directors of OccuLogix, Inc. amends Plan to increase the share reserve to 4,456,000.
     
April 2007   Board of Directors of OccuLogix, Inc. resolves to submit to the stockholders of OccuLogix, Inc., for their authorization at the 2007 Annual Meeting, a proposal to increase the share reserve under the Plan by 2,000,000, from 4,456,000 to 6,456,000.
     
June 2007   Stockholders of OccuLogix, Inc. approve the proposal to increase the share reserve under the Plan by 2,000,000, from 4,456,000 to 6,456,000.
     
May 2008   Board of Directors of OccuLogix, Inc. resolves to submit to the stockholders of OccuLogix, Inc., for their authorization at the 2008 Annual and Special Meeting, a proposal to increase the share reserve under the Plan by 53,544,000, from 6,456,000 to 60,000,000.
     
September 2008   Stockholders of OccuLogix, Inc. approve the proposal to increase the share reserve under the Plan by 53,544,000, from 6,456,000 to 60,000,000.
     
October 2008   OccuLogix, Inc. effects a 1:25 reverse stock split, as a result of which every 25 issued and outstanding shares of common stock were combined into one share (and any fractional share was converted into a whole share) and the share reserve under the Plan was decreased to 2,400,000.
     
December 2009   Board of Directors of OccuLogix, Inc. resolves to submit to the stockholders of OccuLogix, Inc., for their authorization at the 2010 Annual Meeting, a proposal to increase the share reserve under the Plan by 800,000, from 2,400,000 to 3,200,000.
     
May 2010   Board of Directors of OccuLogix, Inc. approves the amendment of the Plan to provide for full vesting acceleration of all outstanding stock options in the event of a change in control in which the acquiring corporation does not assume or substitute for outstanding stock options under the Plan; and (ii) full vesting acceleration of all outstanding stock options held by an optionee in the event the optionee’s service with OccuLogix (or its successor) is involuntarily terminated within 18 months following a change in control in which the acquiring corporation assumes or substitutes for outstanding stock options under the Plan.
     
June 2010   Stockholders of TearLab Corporation (formerly OccuLogix, Inc.) approve the proposal to increase the share reserve under the Plan by 800,000, from 2,400,000 to 3,200,000.

 

 
 

 

April 2012   Board of Directors of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for (i) an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 3,200,000 to 4,200,000 and (ii) ability to grant Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.
     
June 2012   Stockholders of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for (i) an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 3,200,000 to 4,200,000 and (ii) ability to grant Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.
     
March 2013   Board of Directors of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 4,200,000 to 5,200,000.
     
June 2013   Stockholders of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 4,200,000 to 5,200,000.
     
February 2014   Board of Directors of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 5,200,000 to 6,200,000, to remove prospective service providers from the list of individuals eligible to participate in the Plan, to remove the limits on the number of awards that may be granted to an employee in a fiscal year, and to make certain other amendments to update the Plan.
     
June 2014   Stockholders of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 5,200,000 to 6,200,000, to remove prospective service providers from the list of individuals eligible to participate in the Plan, to remove the limits on the number of awards that may be granted to an employee in a fiscal year, and to make certain other amendments to update the Plan.
     
February 2015   Board of Directors of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 6,200,000 to 7,200,000 and to eliminate the ability of the Board to re-price options without stockholder approval.
     
June 2015   Stockholders of TearLab Corporation approve the amendment of the Plan to provide for an increase in the share reserve under the Plan by 1,000,000 from 6,200,000 to 7,200,000 and to eliminate the ability of the Board to re-price options without stockholder approval.

 

- 2 -
 

 

AMENDMENT 2 TO TERM LOAN AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT 2, dated as of August 6, 2015 (this “ Amendment ”) is made among TearLab Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“ Borrower ”), the subsidiary guarantors listed on the signature pages hereof under the heading “SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS” (each a “ Subsidiary Guarantor ” and, collectively, the “ Subsidiary Guarantors ”) and the lenders listed on the signature pages hereof under the heading “LENDERS” (each a “ Lender ” and, collectively, the “ Lenders ”), with respect to the Loan Agreement referred to below.

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Lenders are parties to a Term Loan Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2015, as amended by the Omnibus Amendment Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2015 (the “ Loan Agreement ”), with the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time party thereto.

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Loan Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements, provisions and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

 

SECTION 1. Definitions; Interpretation .

 

(a) Terms Defined in Loan Agreement . All capitalized terms used in this Amendment (including in the recitals hereof) and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Loan Agreement.

 

(b) Interpretation . The rules of interpretation set forth in Section 1.03 of the Loan Agreement shall be applicable to this Amendment and are incorporated herein by this reference.

 

SECTION 2. Amendment . Subject to Section 3 , the Loan Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

(a) The definition of “Loan Documents” in Section 1.01 of the Loan Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

Loan Documents ” means, collectively, this Agreement, the Fee Letter, the Notes, the Security Documents, each Warrant (other than for purposes of Section 5 hereof), any subordination agreement or any intercreditor agreement entered into by Lenders with any other creditors of Obligors and with any Obligors, and any other present or future document, instrument, agreement or certificate executed by Obligors for the benefit of Lenders in connection with this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, all as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified.

 

(b) The definition of “Obligations” in Section 1.01 of the Loan Agreement is amended by adding the following sentence as the final sentence of such definition:

 

 
 

 

“Obligations shall exclude Warrant Obligations.”

 

(c) Section 1.01 of the Loan Agreement is amended to add the following definitions thereto in the appropriate alphabetical order:

 

Warrant ” means each warrant to purchase Equity Interests of Borrower, issued by Borrower to the Lenders pursuant to Section 6.02(g) in connection with the Transactions.

 

Warrant Obligations ” means, with respect to any Obligor, all amounts, obligations, liabilities, covenants and duties of every type and description owing by such Obligor to any Lender, any other indemnitee hereunder or any participant arising out of, under or in connection with, any Warrant, whether or not evidenced by any instrument or for the payment of money.

 

(d) Section 6.02(a) of the Loan Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“(a) Borrowing Date . Such Borrowing shall occur on or before November 16, 2015.”

 

(e) Section 6.02(c) of the Loan Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“(c) [Reserved].”

 

(f) Section 6.02(d) of the Loan Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“(d) [Reserved].”

 

(g) Section 6.02(e) of the Loan Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“The Lenders shall have received a Notice of Borrowing at least 10 Business Days prior to the second Borrowing Date.”

 

2
 

 

(h) Section 6.02 of the Loan Agreement is amended by inserting “(f)” before the following language:

 

“Financing Fee. Each Lender shall have received its portion of the fees payable pursuant to the Fee Letter.”

 

(i) Section 6.02 of the Loan Agreement is amended by adding the following provision thereto:

 

“(g) Warrants . Borrower shall have issued to the Lenders in accordance with their Proportionate Shares, Warrants with a five (5) year term on the second Borrowing Date, to purchase 350,000 shares of the common stock of the Borrower, such shares to be apportioned as indicated on Schedule 1 . All Warrants issued pursuant to this Section 6.02(g) will have an initial exercise price per share of common stock equal to $5.00.”

 

(j) Section 13.01 of the Loan Agreement is amended by adding “(excluding the Warrants)” after each instance of “Loan Document” or “Loan Documents” contained therein.

 

(k) Schedule 1 of the Loan Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the Schedule 1 attached hereto.

 

SECTION 3. Conditions of Effectiveness . The effectiveness of Section 2 shall be subject to the following conditions precedent:

 

(a) The Borrower shall have paid or reimbursed Lenders for Lenders’ reasonable out of pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Amendment, including Lenders’ reasonable and documented out of pocket legal fees and costs, pursuant to Section 12.03(a)(i)(z) of the Loan Agreement.

 

(b) The representations and warranties in Section 4 shall be true in all material respects on the date hereof and on the first date on which the condition set forth in Section 3(a) shall have been satisfied.

 

SECTION 4. Representations and Warranties; Reaffirmation .

 

(a) The Borrower hereby represents and warrants to each Lender as follows:

 

(i) The Borrower has full power, authority and legal right to make and perform this Amendment. This Amendment is within the Borrower’s corporate powers and has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate and, if required, by all necessary shareholder action. This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower, enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws of general applicability affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights and (b) the application of general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). This Amendment (x) does not require any consent or approval of, registration or filing with, or any other action by, any Governmental Authority or any third party, except for such as have been obtained or made and are in full force and effect, (y) will not violate any applicable law or regulation or the charter, bylaws or other organizational documents of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries or any order of any Governmental Authority, other than any such violations that, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (z) will not violate or result in an event of default under any material indenture, agreement or other instrument binding upon the Borrower and its Subsidiaries or assets, or give rise to a right thereunder to require any payment to be made by any such Person.

 

(ii) No Default has occurred or is continuing or will result after giving effect to this Amendment.

 

3
 

 

(iii) The representations and warranties made by or with respect to the Borrower in Section 7 of the Loan Agreement are true in all material respects (taking into account any changes made to schedules updated in accordance with Section 7.21 of the Loan Agreement or attached hereto), except that such representations and warranties that refer to a specific earlier date were true in all material respects on such earlier date.

 

(iv) There has been no Material Adverse Effect since the date of the Loan Agreement.

 

(b) The Borrower hereby ratifies, confirms, reaffirms, and acknowledges its obligations under the Loan Documents to which it is a party and agrees that the Loan Documents remain in full force and effect, undiminished by this Amendment, except as expressly provided herein. By executing this Amendment, the Borrower acknowledges that it has read, consulted with its attorneys regarding, and understands, this Amendment.

 

SECTION 5. Governing Law; Submission to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial .

 

(a) Governing Law . This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws that would result in the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction; provided that Section 5-1401 of the New York General Obligations Law shall apply.

 

(b) Submission to Jurisdiction . The Borrower agrees that any suit, action or proceeding with respect to this Amendment or any other Loan Document to which it is a party or any judgment entered by any court in respect thereof may be brought initially in the federal or state courts in Houston, Texas or in the courts of its own corporate domicile and irrevocably submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of each such court for the purpose of any such suit, action, proceeding or judgment. This Section 5 is for the benefit of the Lenders only and, as a result, no Lender shall be prevented from taking proceedings in any other courts with jurisdiction. To the extent allowed by applicable Laws, the Lenders may take concurrent proceedings in any number of jurisdictions.

 

(c) Waiver of Jury Trial . The Borrower and each Lender hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any and all right to trial by jury in any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Amendment, the other Loan Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby .

 

SECTION 6. Miscellaneous .

 

(a) No Waiver . Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of compliance with any term or condition contained in the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents or constitute a course of conduct or dealing among the parties. Except as expressly stated herein, the Lenders reserve all rights, privileges and remedies under the Loan Documents. Except as amended hereby, the Loan Agreement and other Loan Documents remain unmodified and in full force and effect. All references in the Loan Documents to the Loan Agreement shall be deemed to be references to the Loan Agreement as amended hereby.

 

4
 

 

(b) Severability . In case any provision of or obligation under this Amendment shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions or obligations, or of such provision or obligation in any other jurisdiction, shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

 

(c) Headings . Headings and captions used in this Amendment (including the Exhibits, Schedules and Annexes hereto, if any) are included for convenience of reference only and shall not be given any substantive effect.

 

(d) Integration . This Amendment constitutes a Loan Document and, together with the other Loan Documents, incorporates all negotiations of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and is the final expression and agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.

 

(e) Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument and any of the parties hereto may execute this Amendment by signing any such counterpart.

 

(f) Controlling Provisions . In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of any other Loan Document, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern and prevail. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Loan Documents shall not be modified and shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 

5
 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment, as of the date first above written.

 

  BORROWER:
     
  TEARLAB CORPORATION
     
  By: /s/ Wes Brazell
  Name: Wes Brazell
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
     
  SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS:
     
  TEARLAB RESEARCH, INC.
     
  By: /s/ William Dumencu
  Name: William Dumencu
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
     
  OCUHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
     
  By: /s/ William Dumencu
  Name: William Dumencu
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
     
  OCUHUB LLC
     
  By: /s/ Barry Barresi
  Name: Barry Barresi
  Title: CEO
     
  OCCULOGIX CANADA CORP.
     
  By: /s/ William Dumencu
  Name: William Dumencu
  Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

[Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Term Loan Agreement]

 

 
 

 

LENDERS:

 

CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II L.P.

By CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II GP L.P., its General Partner

By CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II GP LLC, its General Partner

 

By : /s/ Nathan Hukill  
Name: Nathan Hukill  
Title: Authorized Signatory  

 

CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II – PARALLEL FUND “A” L.P.

By CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II – PARALLEL FUND “A” GP L.P., its General Partner

By CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II – PARALLEL FUND “A” GP LLC, its General Partner

 

By: /s/ Nathan Hukill  
Name: Nathan Hukill  
Title: Authorized Signatory  

 

PARALLEL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES PARTNERS II L.P.

By PARALLEL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES PARTNERS II GP L.P., its General Partner

By PARALLEL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES PARTNERS II GP LLC, its General Partner

 

By: /s/ Nathan Hukill  
Name: Nathan Hukill  
Title: Authorized Signatory  

 

CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II – PARALLEL FUND “B” (CAYMAN) L.P.

By CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II (CAYMAN) GP L.P., its General Partner

By CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II (CAYMAN) GP LLC, its General Partner

 

By /s/ Nathan Hukill  
Name: Nathan Hukill  
Title: Authorized Signatory  

 

WITNESS: /s/ Nicole Nesson  
Name: Nicole Nesson  

 

[Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Term Loan Agreement]

 

 
 

 

Schedule 1
to Term Loan Agreement

 

COMMITMENTS

 

Lender   Commitment     Proportionate Share  
Capital Royalty Partners II L.P.   $ 4,666,667       13.33 %
Capital Royalty Partners II – Parallel Fund “A” L.P.   $ 16,333,333       46.67 %
Parallel Investment Opportunities Partners II L.P.   $ 14,000,000       40.00 %
TOTAL   $ 35,000,000       100 %

 

WARRANT SHARES

 

Lender  

Number of Warrant Shares

of Common Stock

(Second Borrowing)

 
Capital Royalty Partners II L.P.     46,667  
Capital Royalty Partners II – Parallel Fund “A” L.P.     163,333  
Parallel Investment Opportunities Partners II L.P.     140,000  
TOTAL     350,000  

 

 
 

 

 

 

Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Elias Vamvakas, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TearLab Corporation ;
   
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
   
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
   
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
   
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
   
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report the Company’s conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
   
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
   
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the Company’s most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
   
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: August 7, 2015

 

  /s/ Elias Vamvakas
  Elias Vamvakas
  Chief Executive Officer

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Wes Brazell, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TearLab Corporation.;
   
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
   
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
   
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
   
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
   
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report the Company’s conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
   
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
   
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the Company’s most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
   
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: August 7, 2015

 

  /s/ Wes Brazell
  Wes Brazell
  Chief Financial Officer

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TearLab Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

  By: /s/ Elias Vamvakas
    Elias Vamvakas
    Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: August 7, 2015

 

 
 

 

 

 

Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TearLab Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wes Brazell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

  By: /s/ Wes Brazell
    Wes Brazell
    Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: August 7, 2015