NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Organization and Nature of Business

Blow & Drive Interlock (“the Company”) was incorporated on July 2, 2013 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company markets and rents alcohol ignition interlock devices to DUI/DWI offenders as part of their mandatory court or motor vehicle department programs. The Company has approval for its device in the following states: California, Colorado, Kansas, New York, Tennessee, Arizona, Oregon, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Texas.

In 2015, the Company formed BDI Manufacturing, Inc., an Arizona corporation which is a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation. The Company markets, installs and monitors a breath alcohol ignition interlock device (BAIID) called the BDI-747/1, which is a mechanism that is installed on the steering column of an automobile and into which a driver exhales. The device in turn provides a blood-alcohol concentration analysis. If the driver’s blood-alcohol content is higher than a certain pre-programmed limit, the device prevents the ignition from engaging and the automobile from starting. These devices are often required for use by DUI or DWI (“driving under the influence” or “driving while intoxicated”) offenders as part of a mandatory court or motor vehicle department program.

The Company licenses the rights to third party distributors to promote the BDI-747/1 and provide services related to the device. The distributorships are for specific geographical areas (either entire states or certain counties within states). The Company currently has entered into six distributorship agreements. Under the distribution agreements the Company typically receives a onetime fee, and then is entitled to receive a per unit registration fee and a per unit monthly fee for each BDI-747/1 unit the distributor has in inventory or on the road beginning thirty (30) days after the distributor receives the unit.

On December 31, 2018, Laurence Wainer, CEO of the Company, and The Doheny Group, a major note holder of the Company, reached an agreement in which Laurence Wainer sold 8,924,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock for a total of $30,000. Upon completion of the sale, David Haridim, managing member of The Doheny Group, assumed the position of CEO of Blow and Drive.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of BDI Manufacturing (the Subsidiary). All material intercompany accounts and transactions between the Company and the Subsidiary have been eliminated in consolidation.

Going Concern

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $4,775,267. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease or reduce its operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. The Company will continue to raise funds through the sale of its equity securities or issuance of notes payable to obtain additional operating capital. The Company is dependent upon its ability to, and will continue to attempt to, secure additional equity and/or debt financing until the Company can earn revenue and realize positive cash flow from its operations. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in earning revenue and realizing positive cash flow from its operations. Without sufficient financing it would be unlikely that the Company will continue as a going concern.

Based on the Company’s current rate of cash outflows, cash on hand and proceeds from the prior sale of equity securities and issuance of notes payable, management believes that its current cash will not be sufficient to meet the anticipated cash needs for working capital for the next 12 months. The Company’s plans with respect to its liquidity issues include, but are not limited to, the following:

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and achieve profitable operations. These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

Restatements

The Company has restated its March 31, 2017 financial statements. The original March 31, 2017 financial statements erroneously recognized the entire upfront fees from two of its independent distributors in revenue at the time the Company delivered the exclusive license to the distributors rather than over the term of the agreements (5 years). To correct that error, the Company has shown the portion of the upfront fees attributable to that period only.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. All reclassifications have been applied consistently to the periods presented.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when earned and related costs of sales and expenses when incurred. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-10-S99, Revenue Recognition, Overall, SEC Materials (“Section 605-10-S74”). Section 605-10-S99 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Cost of revenue consists of the cost of the purchased goods and labor related to the corresponding sales transaction. When a right of return exists, the Company defers revenues until the right of return expires. The Company recognizes revenue from services at the time the services are completed. Monthly per unit fee revenue is earned and recognized over the term of the contract as support services are provided. Revenues from territory exclusivity are earned when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the sales price has been determined and collectability has been reasonably assured.

Deferred revenue

Deferred revenue consists of customer orders paid in advance of the delivery of the order. Deferred revenue is classified as short-term as the typical order ships within approximately three weeks of placing the order. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when the product is shipped to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are recorded as general and administrative expenses when they are incurred. Advertising and marketing expenses were $16,861 and $14,231 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company’s accounts receivable primarily consist of trade receivables. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts that is based on historical trends, customer knowledge, any known disputes, and the aging of the accounts receivable balances combined with management’s estimate of future potential recoverability. Receivables are written off against the allowance after all attempts to collect a receivable have failed. The Company believes its allowance for doubtful accounts as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is adequate, but actual write-offs could exceed the recorded allowance.

Royalty Accrual

The Company entered into royalty agreement to be paid out in perpetuity based on number of units sold for specified product model in years 2018, 2017 and 2016 in connection with notes payable as discussed in Note 12. These estimates were performed at the inception for the notes to reflect the associated debt discount. The Company accruals royalties and is reduced by payments.

Derivative Liability

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 815-40, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC Topic 815-40”), under which convertible instruments, which contain terms that protect holders from declines in the stock price, may not be exempt from derivative accounting treatment. As a result, embedded conversion options (whose exercise price is not fixed and determinable) in convertible debt (which is not conventionally convertible due to the exercise price not being fixed and determinable) are initially recorded as a liability and are revalued at fair value at each reporting date using the Black Sholes Model. The Company revalues these derivatives each quarter using the Black Sholes Model. The change in valuation is accounted for as a gain or loss in derivative liability.

Convertible Debt and Warrants Issued with Convertible Debt

Convertible debt is accounted for under the guidelines established by ASC 470, Debt with Conversion and Other Options and ASC 740, Beneficial Conversion Features . The Company records a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) when convertible debt is issued with conversion features at fixed or adjustable rates that are below market value when issued. If, however, the conversion feature is dependent upon a condition being met or the occurrence of a specific event, the BCF will be recorded when the related contingency is met or occurs. The BCF for the convertible instrument is recorded as a reduction, or discount, to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the fair value of the conversion feature. The discount is then amortized to interest over the life of the underlying debt using the effective interest method.

The Company calculates the fair value of warrants issued with the convertible instruments using the Black-Scholes valuation method, using the same assumptions used for valuing employee options for purposes of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation , except that the contractual life of the warrant is used. Under these guidelines, the Company allocates the value of the proceeds received from a convertible debt transaction between the conversion feature and any other detachable instruments (such as warrants) on a relative fair value basis. The allocated fair value is recorded as a debt discount or premium and is amortized over the expected term of the convertible debt to interest expense.

For modifications of convertible debt, the Company records a modification that changes the fair value of an embedded conversion feature, including a BCF, as a debt discount which is then amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the debt. If modification is considered substantial (i.e. greater than 10% of the carrying value of the debt), an extinguishment of debt is deemed to have occurred, resulting in the recognition of an extinguishment gain or loss.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure, for valuing financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The table below describes the Company’s valuation of financial instruments using guidance from ASC 820-10:

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the period.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 Stock Compensation , which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to an employee stock purchase plan based on the estimated fair values.

For non-employee stock-based compensation, the Company applies FASB ASC Topic 505 Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees , which requires stock-based compensation related to non-employees to be accounted for based on the fair value of the related stock or options or the fair value of the services on the grant date, whichever is more readily determinable in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Related Parties

Related parties are any entities or individuals that, through employment, ownership or other means, possess the ability to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Company.

Concentrations

All of the Company’s ignition interlock devices are purchased from one supplier in China. The loss of this supplier could have a material impact on the Company’s ability to timely obtain additional units.

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, one distributor, licensed in four states, makes up approximately 72% percent of all revenues from distributors at March 31, 2018. The loss of this distributer would have a material impact on the Company’s revenues. Per an agreement dated January 21, 2018 that memorialized a September 30, 2017 oral agreement, the Company and its largest distributor cancelled their distributorship agreement dated September 5, 2015. See Note 18 below.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC 740, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company also follows ASC 740-10-25, which provides detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “ Accounting for Income Taxes” . ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company assessed the classification of its derivative financial instruments as of March 31, 2018, which consist of convertible instruments and rights to shares of the Company’s common stock, and determined that such derivatives meet the criteria for liability classification under ASC 815.

ASC 815 generally provides three criteria that, if met, require companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free-standing derivative financial instruments. These three criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument subject to the requirements of ASC 815. ASC 815 also provides an exception to this rule when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as defined.

Convertible Instruments

The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in its convertible instruments in accordance with professional standards for “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”.

ASC 815-40 provides that, among other things, generally, if an event is not within the entity’s control or could require net cash settlement, then the contract shall be classified as an asset or a liability.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2018 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 changes existing tax law and includes numerous provisions that will affect businesses. This guidance addresses the recognition of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have an impact as the Company has been in a loss position and has not recognized federal taxes payable or refundable or deferred tax liabilities or deferred tax assets.

In November 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-14, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The ASU modified Topic 220 such that an operating-differential subsidy must be set forth as a separate line item in the statement of comprehensive income either under a revenue caption presented separately from revenue from contracts with customers accounted for under ASC Topic 606 or as credit in the costs and expenses section. The ASU essentially deleted Topic 605 and noted that it was superseded by Topic 606. The ASU modified Topic 606 for vaccine manufacturers to recognize revenue when vaccines are placed into Federal Governmental stockpile programs because control of the enumerated vaccines will have been transferred to the customer and the criteria to recognize revenue in a bill-and-hold arrangement under ASC Topic 606 will have been met. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Leases. The ASU adds SEC paragraphs to the new revenue and leases sections of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC or Codification) on the announcement the SEC Observer made at the 20 July 2017 EITF meeting. The SEC Observer said that the SEC staff would not object if entities that are considered public business entities only because their financial statements or financial information is required to be included in another entity’s SEC filing use the effective dates for private companies when they adopt ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and ASC 842, Leases. This would include entities whose financial statements are included in another entity’s SEC filing because they are significant acquirees under Rule 3-05 of Regulation S-X, significant equity method investees under Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X and equity method investees whose summarized financial information is included in a registrant’s financial statement notes under Rule 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share; Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity; Derivatives and Hedging; Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. An entity will no longer have to consider “down round” features (i.e., a provision in an equity-linked financial instrument or an embedded feature that reduces the exercise price if the entity sells stock for a lower price or issues an equity-linked instrument with a lower exercise price) when determining whether certain equity-linked financial instruments or embedded features are indexed to its own stock. An entity that presents earnings per share (EPS) under ASC 260 will recognize the effect of a down round feature in a freestanding equity-classified financial instrument only when it is triggered. The effect of triggering such a feature will be recognized as a dividend and a reduction to income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. The new guidance will require new disclosures for financial instruments with down round features and other terms that change conversion or exercise prices. The ASU also replaces today’s indefinite deferral of the guidance in ASC 480-10 for certain mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests with a scope exception. This change does not require any transition guidance because it does not have an accounting effect. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Asset Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory. The ASU eliminates the deferral of the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers other than inventory. As a result, the tax expense from the intercompany sale of assets, other than inventory, and associated changes to deferred taxes will be recognized when the sale occurs even though the pre-tax effects of the transaction have not been recognized. The effect of the adoption of the standard will depend on the nature and amount of any future transactions.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows; Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new standard addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The eight issues are: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned insurance policies; distribution received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new standard clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Topic 606 addresses that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. When an entity is a principal (that is, if it controls the specific good or service before that good or service is transferred to a customer) and satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the gross amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for the specific good or service transferred to the customer. When an entity is an agent and satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the amount of any fee or commission to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for arranging for the specific good or service to be provided by the other party. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-2, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition. Similarly, lessors will be required to classify leases as sales-type, finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of income recognition. Classification for both lessees and lessors will be based on an assessment of whether risks and rewards as well as substantive control have been transferred through a lease contract. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for leases for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

Below are the restated December 31, 2016 financial statements. The original December 31, 2016 financial statements erroneously recognized the entire upfront fees from two of its independent distributors in revenue at the time the Company delivered the exclusive license to the distributors rather than over the term of the agreements (5 years). To correct that error, the Company has shown the portion of the upfront fees attributable to that period only.

Note 4 – Segment Reporting

The Company has two reportable segments: (1) Monitoring and (2) Distributorships.

Monitoring fees on Company installed units

The Company rents units directly to customers and installs the units in the customer’s vehicles. The rental periods range from a few months to 2 years and include a combination of down payments made by the customer and monthly payments paid under the agreements with the Company. Revenue is recognized from these companies on the straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. Amounts collected in excess of those earned are classified as deferred revenue in the balance sheet, and amounts earned in excess of amounts collected are reflected in accounts receivable in the balance sheet at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Distributorships

The Company enters into arrangements that include multiple deliverables, which typically consist of the sale of exclusive distributorship territory rights, startup supplies package, promotional material, three weeks of onsite training and ongoing monthly support services. The Company accounts for each material element within an arrangement with multiple deliverables as separate units of accounting. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting under the guidance of ASC Topic 605-25, Multiple-Element Revenue Arrangements, which provides criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable is based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available, third-party evidence if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor third-party evidence is available. The Company is required to determine the best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. The Company generally does not separately sell distributorships or training on a standalone basis. Therefore, the Company does not have VSOE for the selling price of these units nor is third party evidence available and thus management uses its best estimate of selling prices in their allocation of revenue to each deliverable in the multiple element arrangement.

The following table summarizes net sales and identifiable operating income by segment:

(a)  Segment gross profit includes segment net sales less segment cost of sales

(b)  Identifiable segment operating expenses consists of identifiable depreciation expense

(c)  Identifiable segment operating incomes consists of segment gross profit less identifiable operating expense

(d)  General corporate expense consists of all other non-identifiable expenses    

Note 5 – Deposits

Deposits consist of the following:

Note 7 - Deferred Revenue

The Company classifies income as deferred until the terms of the contract or time frame have been met within the Company’s revenue recognition policy. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, deferred revenue consists of the following:

January 2016 - $65,000

On January 20, 2016, the Company entered into a non-interest bearing note payable and royalty agreement with a third party. Under the note, the Company borrowed $65,000 and began to repay the principal amount at a rate of approximately $937 per month with escalations to approximately $3,531 per month as of February 2017 until the note is paid in full. In addition, starting in February 2018, the Company will pay the lender a royalty fee of five ($5) dollars per month for every ignition interlock devise that the Company has on the road in customers’ vehicles up to eight hundred (800) in perpetuity, and for every unit over 800, the Company will owe the lender $1 per month per device in perpetuity. In connection with this note, the Company recorded a debt discount of $65,000 relating to the future royalty payments, to be amortized over the life of the note.

On September 30, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to Royalty note #1 in order to remove a security interest in the Company’s assets to secure repayment of the original note and amend the royalty provisions of the original note to be $1 for each Device on the road beginning in the 25th month after the date of the original note. In connection with this amendment, the Company issued 425,000 shares of restricted common stock. Pursuant to ASC 470 this amendment is a deemed extinguishment of the debt and the resulting revised debt is set up as a new note. In connection therewith, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of $116,541 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Total interest expense was $0 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

April 2016 - $50,000

On March 30, 2016, the Company entered into a borrowing agreement with a third party. The note was for a principal balance of $50,000 and included 50,000 restricted common shares. The promissory note has a maturity date of June 30, 2018 and bears interest at 18% per annum. The purchaser did not sign the agreement nor deliver the proper consideration prior to March 31, 2016. The exchange of the $50,000 in cash consideration by the purchaser and the issuance of the 50,000 restricted common shares by the Company was made in conjunction with delivery of the signed purchase agreement and promissory note on April 5, 2016. The Company recorded a debt discount of $50,000 related to the relative fair value of the issued shares associated with the note to be amortized over the life of the note.

Total interest expense was $2,250 and $2,250 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

September 2016 - $10,000

On September 23, 2016, the Company provided an agreement to a third party to obtain a $10,000 promissory note in exchange for 100,000 restricted common shares and $10,000 in cash. The promissory note had a maturity date of October 31, 2017 and bears interest at 24% per annum. On October 31, 2017, the note was amended to extend the maturity date to October 31, 2018. There are no other changes to the note. The Company recorded a debt discount of $10,000 related to the relative fair value of the issued shares associated with the note to be amortized over the life of the note.

Total interest expense was $600 and $600 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

December 2017 - $50,000

On December 1, 2017, the Company provided an agreement to a third party to obtain a $50,000 promissory note in exchange for $50,000 in cash. The promissory note had a maturity date of December 1, 2020 and bears interest at 15% per annum. The note required total payments of $1,733 per month. The Company recorded a debt discount of $22,650 related to the value of the issued shares associated with the process of obtaining the note to be amortized over the life of the note.

Total interest expense was $1,833 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

January 2018 - $9,100

On January 4, 2018, the Company provided an agreement to a third party to obtain a $9,100 promissory note in exchange for $9,100 cash. The promissory note had a maturity date of July 17, 2018 and includes fees of $2,184. The note required payments of $2,427 for each of the first two months and $1,608 for each of the next five months.

Total fees were $1,161 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

January 2018 - $12,500

On January 1, 2018, the Company provided an agreement to a third party to obtain a $12,500 promissory note in exchange for $12,500 cash. The promissory note had a maturity date of April 18, 2018 and includes fees of $1,027. The note required payments of $1,127 per week until paid in full.

Total fees were $819 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

January 2016 - $55,000

On March 29, 2016, the Company consummated a non-interest bearing note payable and royalty agreement with a relative of the CEO with terms almost identical to the note referenced above. Under the note, the Company borrowed $55,000 and began to repay the principal amount at a rate of approximately $937 per month with escalations to approximately $3,531 per month as of April 2017 until the note is paid in full. In addition, starting in February 2018, the Company will pay the lender a royalty fee of five ($5) dollars per month for every ignition interlock devise that the Company has on the road in customers’ vehicles up to eight hundred (800) in perpetuity, and for every unit over 800, the Company will owe the lender $1 per month per device in perpetuity. In connection with this note, the Company recorded a debt discount of $55,000 relating to the future royalty payments, to be amortized over the life of the note.

On September 30, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to Royalty note #2 to amend the royalty provisions of the original note to be $1 for each Device on the road beginning in the 25th month after the date of the Royalty note #2. In connection with this amendment, the Company issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock and recorded an additional debt discount of $8,959. This amendment was accounted for as a debt modification pursuant to ASC 470.

Total interest expense was $0 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

November 2017 - $900,000

On November 1, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a related third party to exchange the September 2016 $36,100 note, the September 2016 $192,000 note, the October 2016 $24,960 note, the November 2016 $5,040 note, the November 2016 $50,000 note, the November 2016 $325,000 note, the January 2017 $50,400 note, the February 2017 $70,000 note, and the March 2017 $75,000 note for a new promissory note for $900,000. The new promissory note also included accrued interest payable and payment of Company expenses. The term of the loan is sixty months and payments are to be $25,000 per month with $15,000 in principal payment and $10,000 in interest payment. The first payment is to be on December 1, 2017 and the final payment on November 1, 2022.

Total interest expense was $56,066 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

February 2018 - $100,000

On February 1, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with a related third party to obtain a $100,000 promissory note in exchange for $100,000 cash. The note calls for a monthly fee of $2,500 and the principal is due February 1, 2019.

Total interest expense was $5,000 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

March 2018 - $500,000

On March 1, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with a related third party to obtain a $500,000 promissory note in exchange for $500,000 cash. The note calls for a monthly fee of $12,500 per month for the first year, $12,000 per month for the second year, $11,500 for the third year, $11,000 for the fourth year, and $10,500 for the fifth year, and the principal is due March 1, 2023.

Total interest expense was $11,695 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.