ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Spirit Airlines, Inc. ("Spirit"), headquartered in Dania Beach, Florida, is a leading low-fare carrier committed to offering an enhanced travel experience with flexible, affordable options. During 2024, we served 87 destinations in 15 countries throughout the United States, Latin America and the Caribbean. Our network is supported by an all-Airbus fleet that is one of the youngest and most fuel efficient in the United States. On November 19, 2024, our common stock began trading on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “SAVEQ”.
Our History
We were founded in 1964 as Clippert Trucking Company, a Michigan corporation. We began air charter operations in 1990 and renamed ourselves Spirit Airlines, Inc. in 1992. In 1994, we reincorporated in Delaware and in 1999 we relocated our headquarters to Miramar, Florida. In April 2024, we relocated to a new corporate campus in Dania Beach, Florida.
Our Corporate Information
Our mailing address and executive offices are located at 1731 Radiant Drive, Dania Beach, Florida 33004. We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and, in accordance therewith, file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC. Such periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are available on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. We also post on the Investor Relations page of our website, www.spirit.com, a link to our filings with the SEC, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors and all our employees, and the charters of our Audit, Compensation, Finance, Safety, Security and Operations and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. Our filings with the SEC are posted as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed electronically with the SEC. Please note that information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, this report.
Our Corporate Structure
In August 2020, Spirit formed several new subsidiaries; Spirit Finance Cayman 1 Ltd. (“HoldCo 1”), Spirit Finance Cayman 2 Ltd. (“HoldCo 2), Spirit IP Cayman Ltd. (“Spirit IP”) and Spirit Loyalty Cayman Ltd. (“Spirit Loyalty”). Each are Cayman Islands exempted companies incorporated with limited liability. Spirit IP and Spirit Loyalty are wholly-owned subsidiaries of HoldCo 2 (other than the special share issued to the special shareholder, who granted a proxy to vote such share to the collateral agent for the 8.00% senior secured notes (as defined herein)). HoldCo 1 and HoldCo 2 are special purpose holding companies. HoldCo 2 is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of HoldCo 1 (other than the special share issued to the special shareholder, who granted a proxy to vote such share to the collateral agent for the 8.00% senior secured notes). HoldCo 1 is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Spirit (other than the special share issued to the special shareholder, who granted a proxy to vote such share to the collateral agent for the 8.00% senior secured notes).
Chapter 11 Proceedings
Voluntary Filing under Chapter 11
On November 18, 2024 (the “Petition Date”), we commenced a voluntary case (the “Chapter 11 Case”) under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), and, on November 25, 2024, our subsidiaries (together with Spirit, the “Company Parties”) also filed voluntary petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and joined the Chapter 11 Case (collectively, the “Chapter 11 Cases”). Since the Petition Date, we have been operating our businesses as a debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. Spirit received approval from the Bankruptcy Court for a variety of “first day” motions to continue their ordinary course operations during the Chapter 11 Case. On February 20, 2025, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order (the “Confirmation Order”) confirming the Plan (as defined below).
Commencing the Chapter 11 Cases constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company Parties’ respective obligations under the revolving credit facility, the convertible notes due 2025, the convertible notes due 2026, the 8.00% senior secured notes, the fixed-rate term loans and enhanced equipment trust certificates (collectively, the “Debt Instruments”). The Debt Instruments provide that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the principal and interest due thereunder shall be
immediately due and payable. Any efforts to enforce such payment obligations under the Debt Instruments were automatically stayed as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, and the stakeholders’ rights of enforcement in respect of the Debt Instruments were subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
Restructuring Support Agreement
On November 18, 2024, Spirit entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (the “Restructuring Support Agreement” and the holders parties thereto, the “Supporting Stakeholders”), with certain holders of our 8.00% senior secured notes (the “Senior Secured Notes,” and the holders, the “Senior Secured Noteholders”) and certain holders of the convertible notes (the “Convertible Noteholders”). The Restructuring Support Agreement contemplates agreed-upon terms for a comprehensive restructuring with respect to the Company Parties’ capital structure (the “Restructuring”) to be implemented through a proposed pre-arranged plan of reorganization (the “Plan”).
Pursuant to the Restructuring Support Agreement and the Plan, the Supporting Stakeholders agreed, subject to certain terms and conditions, to the equitization of $410.0 million of outstanding Senior Secured Notes and $385.0 million of outstanding convertible notes, as well as a backstopped $350.0 million new money equity raise upon emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.
The material terms of the Restructuring are set forth in the term sheets attached to the Restructuring Support Agreement, which terms include, among other things:
•Vendors, aircraft lessors and holders of secured aircraft indebtedness will continue to be paid in the ordinary course and will not be impaired.
•The Supporting Stakeholders committed to provide a $300.0 million new money senior secured super-priority DIP Facility (as defined below), as further described under “Debtor-in-Possession Financing.” The DIP Facility is expected to be repaid in full in cash on the effective date of the Plan (the “Effective Date”).
•On the Effective Date, the Company (as reorganized, “Reorganized Spirit”) will issue a single class of common equity interests (the “New Common Equity”) and warrants to purchase New Common Equity (the “New Warrants”) to certain of our creditors as follows: (a) 76.0% pro rata to the Senior Secured Noteholders and (b) 24.0% pro rata to the Convertible Noteholders, subject to dilution on account of the Management Incentive Plan (as defined in the Plan), the $350.0 million Equity Rights Offering (as defined below), as further described under “Backstop Commitment Agreement,” and certain adjustments set forth in the Plan.
•On the Effective Date, Reorganized Spirit will issue $840.0 million of senior secured notes due 2030 (the “Exit Secured Notes”), at an interest rate of (x) 12.00% per annum, of which 8.00% per annum shall be payable in cash and 4.00% per annum shall be payable in-kind or (y) at 11.00% per annum payable in cash, to certain of our creditors as follows: (a) $700.0 million in the aggregate, pro rata, to the Senior Secured Noteholders and (b) $140.0 million in the aggregate, pro rata, to the Convertible Noteholders, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Plan.
•All of our existing common stock and other equity interests will be cancelled without any distributions to the holders of such common stock and other equity interests on account thereof.
Backstop Commitment Agreement
On November 18, 2024, Spirit entered into a Backstop Commitment Agreement (the “Backstop Commitment Agreement”), with the backstop parties named therein (the “Backstop Commitment Parties”). The terms of the Backstop Commitment Agreement are, in pertinent part, as follows:
•Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Backstop Commitment Parties agreed to backstop an equity rights offering of New Common Equity (the “Equity Rights Offering”) for an aggregate purchase price of $350.0 million at 70.0% of Plan Equity Value (as defined in the Backstop Agreement) (such New Common Equity, the “Offering Shares”), as contemplated by the Restructuring Support Agreement.
•Subject to adjustments described below, the Backstop Commitment Agreement provides that $175.0 million of the Offering Shares will be raised by soliciting commitments from certain of our creditors as follows: (a) $137.81 million from Senior Secured Noteholders (the “Senior Secured Notes Subscription Rights”) and (b) $37.19 million from Convertible Noteholders (the “Convertible Notes Subscription Rights”).
•Subject to adjustments described below, the Backstop Commitment Agreement provides that $175.0 million of the Offering Shares will be reserved for purchase by the Backstop Commitment Parties as follows: $137.81 million by the Senior Secured Backstop Commitment Parties (as defined in the Backstop Commitment Agreement) (the “Senior Secured Direct Allocation”) and $37.19 million by the Convertible Backstop Commitment Parties (as defined in the
Backstop Commitment Agreement) (the “Convertible Direct Allocation”, and together with the Senior Secured Direct Allocation, the "Direct Allocation").
•Because Senior Secured Noteholders holding, in the aggregate, at least 90.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes claims had executed the Restructuring Support Agreement by 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on November 25, 2024, the amount of the Senior Secured Notes Subscription Rights increased to $248.06 million and the Senior Secured Direct Allocation was reduced to $27.56 million.
•Because Convertible Noteholders holding, in the aggregate, at least 90.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes claims had executed the Restructuring Support Agreement by 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on November 25, 2024, the amount of the Convertible Notes Subscription Rights increased to $66.94 million and the Convertible Direct Allocation was reduced to $7.44 million.
•As consideration for the commitment by the Backstop Commitment Parties, and subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court: (i) a “Backstop Premium” will be paid to the Backstop Commitment Parties by us in an aggregate number of shares of New Common Equity equal to 10.0% of the total number of shares of New Common Equity issued by the us upon emergence from bankruptcy as distributions under the Plan. If the Backstop Commitment Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances as set forth therein, the Backstop Commitment Agreement provides for a cash payment of $35.0 million to the Backstop Commitment Parties. Since the Backstop Premium is fully earned as of November 18, 2024, the date the Backstop Commitment Agreement was executed, and is a non-refundable, non-avoidable premium, we recorded the entire commitment as of December 31, 2024. This amount was recorded within reorganization expense on our consolidated statement of operations and within other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
The transactions contemplated by the Backstop Commitment Agreement are conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver of customary conditions for transactions of this nature, including, among other things, (i) confirmation of the Plan by the Bankruptcy Court, (ii) the occurrence of the Effective Date and (iii) the Restructuring Support Agreement remaining in full force and effect.
Debtor-in-Possession Financing
Prior to the Petition Date, Spirit and certain lenders and note purchasers (collectively, the “DIP Lenders”) agreed to enter into an approximately $300.0 million senior secured super-priority debtor‑in‑possession facility (the “DIP Facility”) consisting of new money term loans and new money notes, which bears interest at a rate per annum equal to (a) term SOFR plus 7.00% per annum or (b) an alternate base rate plus 6.00% per annum.
The DIP Facility contains various representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default customary for debtor-in-possession financings of this type, including covenants mandating compliance by us with a 13-week budget, variance testing and other reporting requirements.
Spirit’s obligations under the proposed DIP Facility are guaranteed by each subsidiary of Spirit. In addition, the claims of the DIP Lenders are (i) entitled to super-priority administrative expense claim status, subject to certain customary exclusions in the credit documentation and (ii) secured by perfected senior security interests and liens on certain of our property, subject to certain exclusions, exceptions and carve-outs.
The proceeds of all or a portion of the DIP Facility may be used for, among other things, (i) prepetition obligations, (ii) adequate protection payments, (iii) the fees, costs, and expenses of administering the Chapter 11 Cases and (iv) working capital and other general corporate needs of Spirit in the ordinary course of business.
On December 23, 2024, in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, we entered into a Superpriority Secured Debtor In Possession Term Loan Credit and Note Purchase Agreement, (the “DIP Credit Agreement”), with Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Agent”), and the creditors from time to time party thereto (collectively, the “DIP Creditors”). Refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements— 13. Debt and Other Obligations” for additional information.
Equity Rights Offering
On December 30, 2024, we launched an equity rights offering (the “Equity Rights Offering”) of equity securities of the reorganized Company in an aggregate amount of $350.0 million at a purchase price of $14.00 per share. The final expiration date for the Equity Rights Offering occurred on February 20, 2025. We expect to close the Equity Rights Offering on the Effective Date. Pursuant to the terms of the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Backstop Commitment Parties would
receive a backstop premium in the amount of $35.0 million (payable in shares of reorganized Spirit common stock valued at $14.00 per share).
Exit Revolving Credit Facility
We secured a commitment from certain of our pre-petition debtholders (collectively, the “Exit RCF Lenders”) pursuant to that certain Commitment Letter, dated as of January 14, 2025 (the “Exit RCF Commitment Letter”), to provide up to $300.0 million in financing in the form of a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Exit Revolving Credit Facility”). We will enter into the Exit Revolving Credit Facility concurrently with emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases. The Exit Revolving Credit Facility is comprised of (i) commitments by the Exit RCF Lenders to provide revolving credit loans and letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to $275.0 million (the “Exit RCF Commitments”) and (ii) an uncommitted incremental revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount up to $25.0 million. Our uses of the proceeds of the Exit Revolving Credit Facility shall include, among other items, working capital and other general corporate needs of the Company and our subsidiaries.
Our obligations under the Exit Revolving Credit Facility will be guaranteed by each subsidiary of the Company (the “Guarantors”). In addition, the obligations under the Exit Revolving Credit Facility will be secured by perfected senior security interests and liens on certain property of the Company and the Guarantors, subject to certain exclusions, exceptions and carve-outs.
Subject to certain exceptions and conditions, we will be obligated to prepay or offer to prepay, as the case may be, all or a portion of the obligations under the Exit Revolving Credit Facility with the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, with cash from our balance sheet in order to remain in compliance with a collateral coverage ratio and concentration limits, in connection with a change of control and in connection with certain mergers with other airlines. The Exit Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at a variable rate equal to our choice of (a) adjusted term SOFR plus 3.25% per annum or (b) alternate base rate plus 2.25% per annum.
Senior Secured Notes
On November 19, 2024, Spirit began soliciting consents (the “Consent Solicitation”) with respect to the Senior Secured Notes to seek consents to remove certain bankruptcy remote provisions from the agreements governing the Senior Secured Notes. The Consent Solicitation expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on November 25, 2024, and as of the expiration date, Spirit had received valid consents from holders of 94.56% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes, which was sufficient to approve the proposed amendments. As a result of receiving the requisite consents to the proposed amendments, on November 25, 2024, Spirit entered into amendments to the agreements governing the Senior Secured Notes.
Automatic Stay and Other Protections
Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of Spirit’s Chapter 11 Case automatically stayed the continuation of most legal proceedings or the filing of other actions against or on behalf of Spirit or our property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date or to exercise control over property of Spirit’s bankruptcy estate, unless and until the Bankruptcy Court modifies or lifts the automatic stay as to any such claim. Notwithstanding the general application of the automatic stay described above and other protections afforded by the Bankruptcy Code, governmental authorities may determine to continue actions brought under their police and regulatory powers.
NYSE Delisting
On November 18, 2024, we received the Delisting Notice from the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) notifying us that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Case and in accordance with NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 802.01D, the NYSE had determined that our shares of common stock would be delisted from the NYSE and that trading of our shares of common stock on NYSE was suspended immediately. As a result of the suspension and expected delisting, our shares of common stock commenced trading on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “SAVEQ” on November 19, 2024. On December 5, 2024, NYSE filed a Form 25 for us in connection with the delisting of our shares of common stock from NYSE. The delisting became effective ten days after the Form 25 was filed. In accordance with Rule 12d2-2 of the Exchange Act, the deregistration of our shares of common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act will become effective 90 days after the date of the Form 25 filing.
Current Developments
Transformation Plan and Guest Experience Enhancements
In July 2024, we announced and began to execute on a significant transformation plan to de-risk our business, improve our financial performance and elevate the Guest experience with new enhanced benefits. Our transformation initiatives build on our longstanding commitment to deliver the best value in the sky. We are investing to improve every aspect of the Guest journey while delivering affordable prices and an exceptional Guest experience to value-conscious travelers.
As part of this significant transformation, we introduced four new travel options, ranging from elevated to economical to meet the needs of all travelers: Go Big, Go Comfy, Go Savvy and Go.
•Go Big offers a Big Front Seat®, snacks and drinks, including alcoholic beverages, one carry-on bag, one checked bag, priority check-in and boarding, and streaming Wi-Fi access. The Big Front Seat® features enhanced comfort with wider seats, extra legroom, additional seat cushioning and no middle seat.
•Go Comfy offers increased comfort and space with a guaranteed blocked middle seat, one carry-on bag, priority boarding and a snack and non-alcoholic beverage.
•Go Savvy includes one carry-on bag and standard seat selection during booking.
•Go offers the greatest affordability for those who want to keep it simple, with the flexibility to purchase any of the following options: checked bags, standard seat selection, Wi-Fi and snacks and beverages.
Additional initiatives we launched as part of our transformation plan include:
•Elimination of change or cancel fees for Guests who book our bundled travel options, providing them with greater flexibility;
•Increased weight allowance for checked bag to up to 50 pounds;
•Extension of the expiration of our future travel vouchers to 12 months (for vouchers issued on or after June 3, 2024);
•Debut of a priority check-in experience for Guests who purchase our Go Big travel option or our Free Spirit® Gold members or Free Spirit World Elite Mastercard holders at more than 20 airports, including Atlanta (ATL), Las Vegas (LAS), Los Angeles (LAX), Miami (MIA), New York-LaGuardia (LGA) and Orlando (MCO). This dedicated lane provides Guests with front-of-the-line access to the first available ticket counter agent;
•Introduction of a new boarding process, allowing for a more seamless journey for our Guests. The redesigned process includes five groups aimed to reduce boarding time and enhance operational performance. Priority boarding is available for Guests who choose the Go Big and Go Comfy options, Free Spirit Gold and Silver members, Free Spirit World Elite Mastercard holders and active-duty U.S. service members, and their spouses and children when traveling with the service member.
JetBlue Merger
On March 4, 2024, we announced that our merger agreement with JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) had been terminated by mutual agreement. This termination followed the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granting a permanent injunction against the merger on January 16, 2024.
As part of the termination, JetBlue paid us $69.0 million. While the merger agreement was in effect, our stockholders received approximately $425 million in total prepayments.
Pratt & Whitney
On July 25, 2023, RTX Corporation, parent company of Pratt & Whitney, announced that it had determined that a rare condition in the powdered metal used to manufacture certain engine parts will require accelerated inspection of the PW 1100G-JM geared turbo fan (“GTF”) fleet, which powers our A320neo family of aircraft.
On March 26, 2024, we entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with International Aero Engines, LLC (“IAE”), an affiliate of Pratt & Whitney, pursuant to which IAE provided us with a monthly credit, subject to certain conditions, as compensation for each of our aircraft unavailable for operational service due to GTF engine issues from October 1, 2023 through the end of 2024.
The credits were accounted for as vendor consideration in accordance with ASC 705-20 and were recognized as a reduction of the purchase price of the goods or services acquired from IAE during the period, which included the purchase of
maintenance, spare engines and short-term rentals of spare engines, based on an allocation that corresponds to our progress towards earning the credits. Pratt & Whitney agreed to issue us $150.6 million in credits related to the aircraft on ground ("AOG") days through December 31, 2024, of which the entire amount was recognized in 2024. As of December 31, 2024, we recorded $122.2 million of credits as a reduction in the cost basis of assets purchased from IAE within flight equipment and deferred heavy maintenance, net on our consolidated balance sheets. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, we recorded $28.4 million of these credits on our consolidated statements of operations within maintenance, materials and repairs and aircraft rent. In addition, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, we recognized lower depreciation expense of $11.4 million related to credits recognized as a reduction of the cost basis of assets purchased from IAE in depreciation and amortization within our consolidated statements of operations.
The temporary removal of engines from service is expected to continue through at least 2026. We are currently discussing arrangements with Pratt & Whitney for any of our aircraft that remain unavailable for operational service after December 31, 2024.
Aircraft Sale
On October 29, 2024, we entered into an aircraft sale and purchase agreement with GA Telesis, LLC (“GAT”) for the sale of 23 A320ceo and A321ceo aircraft to GAT, of which 2 were sold in December 2024. Currently these aircraft are not being utilized within the operation and are available for immediate sale. Refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements— 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.
Summary Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully in Item 1A. Risk Factors herein. These risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Our Chapter 11 reorganization cases under the Bankruptcy Code;
•The competitiveness of our industry;
•Volatility in fuel costs or significant disruptions in the supply of fuel;
•Adverse domestic or global economic conditions on our business, results of operations and financial condition, including our ability to obtain financing or access capital markets;
•Factors beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports, air traffic control inefficiencies, major construction or improvements at airports, adverse weather conditions, increased security measures, new travel related taxes or the outbreak of disease;
•Increased labor costs, union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruption;
•Our maintenance costs, which will increase as our fleet ages;
•The extensive regulation by the FAA, DOT, TSA and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies to which we are subject;
•Our reliance on technology and automated systems to operate our business;
•Our reliance on third-party service providers to perform functions integral to our operations, including ground handling, fuel, catering, passenger handling, engineering, maintenance, refueling, reservations and other services;
•Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers for our aircraft and engines;
•Reduction in demand for air transportation, or governmental reduction or limitation of operating capacity, in the domestic U.S., Caribbean or Latin American markets;
•The success of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club®;
•Our significant amount of aircraft-related fixed obligations and additional debt that we have incurred, and may incur in the future;
•Our ability to maintain relationships with our general unsecured creditors, employees, customers, vendors, suppliers, aircraft lessors, holders of secured aircraft indebtedness and other third parties;
•Our ability to attract and retain key personnel; and
•Our ability to compete effectively during the transition to a new board of directors.
Our Business Model
Our value-focused business model provides Guests with an enhanced experience and a range of travel options across price points. Our increased investment in the Guest experience and introduction of new premium options allow us to attract more travelers and compete in the premium category with our Go Big and Go Comfy options, while still serving travelers seeking the greatest affordability with our Go Savvy and Go options. Our transformation, launched in 2024, has led to our highest net promoter score (“NPS”) in our history, indicating increased Guest satisfaction.
We strive to be recognized by Guests and potential Guests as a leader in delivering a high-value experience, while providing exceptional Guest service and a variety of travel options. We use low fares to attract value-conscious travelers to help drive high passenger volumes and load factors on the flights we operate. We have high-density seating configurations on our aircraft, which contributes to keeping our unit costs among the lowest in the industry. High passenger volumes and high load factors help increase our sales of ancillary products and services, which, together with our premium travel options, drive increased revenue while still offering competitively priced fares.
We continue to evolve and transform our business model. Before shifting our focus to becoming a value carrier with a broader range of travel options, we operated with an ultra-low-cost structure, which historically allowed us to maintain high profit margins while offering low base fares. Operating at high fleet utilization levels was a primary contributor to our ultra-low-cost structure. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, lower fleet utilization as well as wage and other inflationary pressures increased our operating costs. In addition, following the COVID-19 pandemic, the industry has experienced large capacity increases, leading to increased competition in the markets we serve and resulting in a decrease of our average fares. Together, higher costs and lower fares produced large net losses. In 2024, we began to implement a significant transformation plan to improve our financial performance and elevate the Guest experience with new enhanced benefits.
We believe in being fully transparent and allow our Guests to see all available options and their respective prices prior to purchasing a ticket.
Through branded campaigns, we educate the public on how our transformation has elevated the Guest experience and how our new travel options provide a range of choices from premium to economical. Guests can choose from enhanced bundled options such as Go Big, Go Comfy and Go Savvy or choose our unbundled option, Go, with the greatest flexibility to choose only the options they want to purchase. We show our commitment to delivering enhanced value by continuing to improve every aspect of the Guest experience, including an updated cabin interior with ergonomically-designed seats, self-bag tagging in most airports to reduce check-in processing time, and the choice of increased flexibility with travel options that include no change and cancel fees.
Our Strengths
We believe our low unit operating costs combined with our enhanced travel options and high passenger volumes allow us to compete successfully in the airline industry.
Low Cost Structure. While we have experienced increased pressure on our unit costs over the last four years, our unit operating costs are still among the lowest of all airlines operating in the United States. We believe this unit cost advantage helps protect our market position and enables us to offer highly competitive pricing in our markets. Our operating costs per available seat mile ("CASM") of 11.35 cents in 2024 was significantly lower than those of the major domestic network carriers and among the lowest of the domestic low-cost carriers. We achieve these low unit operating costs in large part due to:
•high-density seating configurations on our aircraft;
•minimal hub-and-spoke network inefficiencies;
•highly productive workforce;
•opportunistic outsourcing of operating functions;
•operating a single-fleet type of Airbus A320-family aircraft that is one of the youngest and most fuel efficient in the United States and operated by common flight crews;
•reduced sales, marketing and distribution costs through direct-to-consumer marketing;
•efficient flight scheduling; and
•a company-wide business culture that is keenly focused on driving costs lower.
Innovative Revenue Generation. We offer a variety of travel options that enable our Guests to select the travel experience they want. They can choose one of our enhanced bundled options with the opportunity to buy additional products or services, or choose our unbundled option which provides Guests the greatest flexibility to identify, select and pay for only the products and services they want to use. We strive to maximize our revenue generation by:
•offering a variety of travel options;
•selling ancillary products and services such as checked and carry-on bags and advanced seat selections;
•applying dynamic pricing to all travel options as well as ancillary products and services;
•generating subscription revenue from our Spirit Saver$ Club®;
•deriving brand-based revenues from proprietary services, such as our Free Spirit affinity credit card program;
•offering third-party travel products (travel packages), such as hotel rooms, ground transportation (rental and hotel shuttle products) and attractions (show or theme park tickets) packaged with air travel on our website; and
•selling third-party travel insurance through our website.
Our Network. We have developed a substantial network of destinations in U.S. domestic markets, Latin America and the Caribbean, and high-volume routes flown by value-conscious travelers. Our network supports the company's business strategy based on current market and operating conditions, by focusing on the best performing, most profitable routes.
Experienced International Operator. We believe we have substantial experience in foreign aviation, security and customs regulations, local ground operations and flight crew training required for successful international and overwater flight operations. All of our aircraft are certified for overwater operations. We have been conducting international flight operations since 2003 and have developed substantial experience in complying with the various regulations and business practices in the international markets we serve. During 2024, 2023 and 2022, no revenue from any one foreign country represented greater than 4% of our total passenger revenue. We attribute operating revenues by geographic region based upon the origin and destination of each passenger flight segment.
Loyalty Programs
We operate the Spirit Saver$ Club®, which is a subscription-based loyalty program that allows members access to unpublished, extra-low fares as well as discounted prices on bags and seats, shortcut boarding and security, and exclusive offers on hotels, rental cars and other travel necessities. We also operate the Free Spirit loyalty program (the “Free Spirit Program”), which attracts members and partners and builds customer loyalty for us by offering a variety of awards, benefits and services. Free Spirit Program members earn and accrue points for dollars spent on our flights and services from non-air partners such as retail merchants, hotels or car rental companies or by making purchases with credit cards issued by partner banks and financial services providers. Points earned and accrued by Free Spirit Program members can be redeemed for travel awards such as free (other than taxes and government-imposed fees), discounted or upgraded travel.
Route Network
During 2024, our route network included over 440 markets served by 87 airports throughout the United States, Latin America and the Caribbean. For more details on the destinations to which we fly, refer to our route map on our website, www.spirit.com/en/route-map. As part of our business model, we employ a rigorous process to identify opportunities to grow our network where we believe we will be most profitable.
Competition
The airline industry is highly competitive. The principal competitive factors in the airline industry are fare pricing, total price, flight schedules, aircraft type, passenger amenities, number of routes served from a city, customer service, safety record and reputation, code-sharing relationships and loyalty programs and redemption opportunities. We typically compete in markets served by traditional U.S. network airlines, and other low-cost carriers, and, to a lesser extent, regional airlines.
As of December 31, 2024, our top three largest network overlaps, as measured by overlapping available seat miles in metro markets, are with American Airlines, Southwest Airlines and Frontier Airlines. Our principal competitive advantage is our relative cost advantage which allows us to offer all-in prices to our Guests at price levels where we can compete effectively.
The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting because, once a flight is scheduled, airlines incur only nominal incremental costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats. The expenses of a scheduled
aircraft flight do not vary significantly with the number of passengers carried and, as a result, a relatively small change in the number of passengers or in pricing could have a disproportionate effect on an airline’s operating and financial results. Price competition occurs on a market-by-market basis through price discounts, changes in pricing structures, fare matching, target promotions and loyalty initiatives. Airlines typically use discount fares and other promotions to stimulate traffic during normally slower travel periods to generate cash flow and to maximize TRASM. The prevalence of discount fares can be particularly acute when a competitor has excess capacity that it is unable to fill at higher rates. A key element to our competitive strategy is to maintain very low unit costs in order to permit us to compete successfully in price-sensitive markets.
Seasonality
Our business is subject to significant seasonal fluctuations. We generally expect demand to be greater in the second and third quarters each year due to more vacation travel during these periods, as compared to the rest of the year. The air transportation business is also volatile and highly affected by economic cycles and trends.
Distribution
The majority of our tickets are sold through direct channels, including online via www.spirit.com, our call center and our airport ticket counters, with www.spirit.com being the primary channel. We also partner with a number of third parties to distribute our tickets, including online and traditional travel agents and electronic global distribution systems.
Guests
We believe our Guests are primarily leisure travelers who make their purchase decision based largely on value. By maintaining a low-cost structure, we have historically been able to successfully sell tickets at lower fares while maintaining a strong profit margin. However, industry capacity increases have led to increased competition in the markets we serve and resulted in a decrease in our average fares.
Guest Service
We are committed to providing exceptional service for our Guests. By focusing on Guest service across all aspects of our operations, including personnel, flight equipment, in-flight amenities, ancillary services, on-time performance, flight completion ratios and baggage handling, we aim to foster customer loyalty and attract new travelers. We continuously work to enhance our operations, ensuring consistent improvement in the Guest experience.
Fleet
We fly only Airbus A320 family aircraft, which provides us significant operational and cost advantages compared to airlines that operate multiple aircraft types. By operating a single aircraft type, we avoid the incremental costs of training crews across multiple types. Flight crews are entirely interchangeable across all of our aircraft, and maintenance, spare parts inventories and other operational support remains highly simplified compared to those airlines with more complex fleets. Due to this commonality among Airbus single-aisle aircraft, we can retain the benefits of a fleet comprised of a single type of aircraft while still having the flexibility to match the capacity and range of the aircraft to the demands of each route.
As of December 31, 2024, we had a fleet of 213 Airbus single-aisle aircraft (including 21 aircraft recorded as assets held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024), which are commonly referred to as “A320 family” aircraft. Refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information on the 21 aircraft recorded as assets held for sale. A320 family aircraft include the A319, A320 and A321 models, which have broadly common design and equipment but differ most notably in fuselage length, service range and seat capacity. Within the A320 family of aircraft, models using existing engine technology may carry the suffix “ceo,” denoting the “current engine option,” while models equipped with new-generation engines may carry the suffix “neo,” denoting the “new engine option.” As of December 31, 2024, our fleet consisted of 2 A319ceos, 63 A320ceos, 91 A320neos, 29 A321ceos and 28 A321neos, and the average age of the fleet was approximately 5.8 years. As of December 31, 2024, we owned 49 aircraft, of which 22 aircraft were financed through fixed-rate long-term debt, 27 aircraft were financed through enhanced equipment trust certificates ("EETCs"). As of December 31, 2024, we had 164 leased aircraft, of which 146 aircraft were financed under operating leases and 18 aircraft would have been deemed finance leases resulting in failed sale leaseback transactions. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we had 5 spare engines financed under operating leases and owned 32 spare engines. Refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—13. Debt and Other Obligations” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—14. Leases” for additional information.
On December 20, 2019, we entered into an A320 NEO Family Purchase Agreement with Airbus S.A.S. ("Airbus") for the purchase of 100 new Airbus A320neo family aircraft, with options to purchase up to 50 additional aircraft. This agreement included a mix of Airbus A319neo, A320neo and A321neo aircraft with such aircraft scheduled for delivery through 2027.
On April 3, 2024, we entered into Amendment No. 7 (the “2024 Amendment”) to the A320 NEO Family Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2019 (the “Airbus Purchase Agreement”) with Airbus. The 2024 Amendment (i) defers all aircraft on order that are scheduled to be delivered in the second quarter of 2025 through the end of 2026 to 2030 through the end of 2031 and (ii) adjusts the delivery periods of option aircraft from 2027 through 2029 to 2029 through 2031.
On July 30, 2024, we entered into a direct lease transaction (the “Direct Lease Transaction”) with AerCap Holdings N.V. (“AerCap”) for 36 aircraft scheduled for delivery between 2027 and 2028 (the “Leased Aircraft”) which were originally part of our order book. Under the terms of the transaction, AerCap will assume the delivery positions for the Leased Aircraft and related pre-delivery payment ("PDP") obligations. AerCap agreed to lease each Leased Aircraft to us upon delivery by Airbus. Each of the leases will have fixed rent payments.
On October 29, 2024, the Company entered into an aircraft sale and purchase agreement with GAT for the sale of 23 A320ceo and A321ceo aircraft to GAT, of which 2 were sold in December 2024. Refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.
As of December 31, 2024, our firm aircraft orders consisted of 55 A320 family aircraft with Airbus, including A320neos and A321neos, with deliveries expected through 2031. As of December 31, 2024, we had secured financing for three aircraft, scheduled for delivery from Airbus through 2025 which will be financed through sale leaseback transactions. We did not have financing commitments in place for the remaining 52 Airbus aircraft currently on firm order through 2031. However, we signed a financing letter of agreement with Airbus which provides backstop financing for a majority of the aircraft included in the Airbus Purchase Agreement. The agreement provides a standby credit facility in the form of senior secured mortgage debt financing. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we had agreements in place for the delivery of 39 direct operating leases of A320neos and A321neos with third-party lessors, expected through 2028.
During the third quarter of 2021, we entered into an Engine Purchase Support Agreement which requires us to purchase a certain number of spare engines in order to maintain a contractual ratio of spare engines to aircraft in the fleet. As of December 31, 2024, we are committed to purchase 16 PW1100G-JM spare engines, with deliveries through 2031. The firm aircraft orders provide for capacity growth as well as the flexibility to add to, or replace, the aircraft in our present fleet. We may elect to supplement these deliveries by additional acquisitions from the manufacturer or in the open market if demand conditions merit. We also may adjust or defer deliveries, or change models of aircraft in our delivery stream, from time to time, as a means to match our future capacity with anticipated demand and growth trends.
Consistent with our business model, each of our aircraft is configured with a high-density seating configuration, which helps us maintain a lower unit cost. Our high-density seating configuration accommodates more passengers than those of most of our competitors when comparing the same type of aircraft.
Maintenance and Repairs
We maintain our aircraft in accordance with an FAA-approved maintenance program built from the manufacturers recommended maintenance schedule and maintained by our Technical Services department. Our maintenance technicians undergo extensive initial and recurrent training to ensure the safe operation of our aircraft. For the seventh year in a row, we have achieved the FAA’s highest award for Technical Training, the Diamond Award of Excellence. This award is only achieved if 100% of technicians receive the FAA’s Aircraft Maintenance Technician (“AMT”) Certificate of Training.
Aircraft maintenance and repair consists of routine and non-routine maintenance, and work performed is divided into three general categories: line maintenance, heavy maintenance and component service. Line maintenance consists of routine daily and weekly scheduled maintenance checks on our aircraft, including pre-flight, daily, weekly and overnight checks, and any diagnostics and routine repairs and any unscheduled items on an as needed basis. Additionally, maintenance program tasks that may take up to two years to fully complete are performed periodically in line maintenance at scheduled day visits or segmented into overnight work packages. Line maintenance events are currently serviced by in-house mechanics supplemented by contract labor and are primarily completed at airports we currently serve. Heavy airframe maintenance checks consist of a series of more complex tasks that generally can take from one to four weeks to accomplish and typically are required approximately every 36 months. Heavy engine maintenance is generally performed every six years and includes a more complex scope of work. Due to our relatively small fleet size and projected changes to our fleet, we believe outsourcing all of our heavy maintenance activity, such as engine servicing, heavy airframe maintenance checks, major part repair and component service repairs is more economical. Outsourcing eliminates the substantial initial capital requirements inherent in heavy aircraft maintenance. We have entered into a long-term flight hour agreement for the majority of our current fleet with IAE and Pratt &
Whitney for our engine overhaul services and with various maintenance providers on an hour-by-hour basis for component services. We outsource our heavy airframe maintenance to FAA-qualified maintenance providers.
Our maintenance costs are expected to increase as the scope of repairs increases with the increasing age of our fleet. As our aircraft age, scheduled scope of work and frequency of unscheduled maintenance events is likely to increase like any maturing fleet. Our aircraft utilization rate could decrease with the increase in aircraft maintenance.
We own and operate a 126,000-square-foot maintenance hangar facility, adjacent to the airfield at the Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW). In addition, we lease and operate a 63,700-square-foot maintenance hangar facility and 35,900-square-foot maintenance warehouse, adjacent to the airfield at the Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH). These hangars and warehouse allow us to reduce our dependence on third-party facilities and contract line maintenance. Please see “Properties—Ground Facilities.”
Employees
Our business is labor intensive, with labor costs representing approximately 28.1%, 27.6% and 22.1% of our total operating costs for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had 3,020 pilots, 5,001 flight attendants, 99 dispatchers, 385 ramp service agents, 315 passenger service agents, 628 aircraft maintenance technicians and 1,883 non-unionized personnel, including airport agents/other and employees in administrative roles, for a total of 11,331 active employees compared to 13,167 active employees as of December 31, 2023. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, there were 2,192 employee terminations, including both voluntary and involuntary terminations, for an overall employee turnover rate of 16.6%. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 84% of our employees were represented by six labor unions. On an average full-time equivalent basis, for the full year 2024, we had 11,941 employees, compared to 12,798 in 2023.
FAA regulations require pilots to have commercial licenses with specific ratings for the aircraft to be flown and be medically certified as physically fit to fly. FAA and medical certifications are subject to periodic renewal requirements, including recurrent training and recent flying experience. Flight attendants must have initial and periodic competency training and qualification. For the year ended December 31, 2024, paid training hours for our pilots and flight attendants were 114,536 and 72,780 hours, representing 7.6% and 2.3% of total crew block hours, respectively. Mechanics, quality-control inspectors and dispatchers must be certificated and qualified for specific aircraft. Training programs are subject to approval and monitoring by the FAA. Management personnel directly involved in the supervision of flight operations, training, maintenance and aircraft inspection must also meet experience standards prescribed by FAA regulations. All safety-sensitive employees are subject to pre-employment, random and post-accident drug testing.
Consistent with our core values, we focus on hiring highly productive and qualified employees and ensure they have comprehensive training. Our training programs focus on and emphasize the importance of safety, customer service, productivity, and cost control. We provide continuous training for our crew members including technical training as well as regular training focused on safety and front-line training for our customer service teams. Our training programs include classroom learning, extensive real-world flying experience, and instruction in full flight simulators, as appropriate.
We believe a direct relationship between Team Members and our leadership is in the best interests of our crew members, our customers, and our shareholders. Our leadership team communicates on a regular basis with all Team Members, including crew members, in order to maintain a direct relationship and to keep them informed about news, strategy updates, and challenges affecting the airline and the industry. Effective and frequent communication throughout the organization is fostered through various means including email messages from our CEO and other senior leaders, open forum meetings across our network, periodic leadership visits to our stations, and annual Team Member engagement surveys. Additionally, we strive to promote human rights awareness among both our Team Members and Guests, supported by our Human Rights Policy.
The Railway Labor Act, or RLA, governs our relations with labor organizations. Under the RLA, our collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) do not expire, but instead become amendable as of a stated date, subject to standard early opener provisions. If either party wishes to modify the terms of any such agreement, they must notify the other party in the manner agreed to by the parties. Under the RLA, after receipt of such notice, the parties must meet for direct negotiations. If no agreement is reached, either party may request the National Mediation Board, or NMB, appoint a federal mediator. The RLA prescribes no set timetable for the direct negotiation and mediation process. It is not unusual for those processes to last for many months, and even several years. If no agreement is reached in mediation, the NMB in its discretion may declare at some time that an impasse exists. If an impasse is declared, the NMB proffers binding arbitration to the parties. Either party may decline to submit to arbitration. If arbitration is rejected by either party, a 30-day “cooling off” period commences. During that period (or after), a Presidential Emergency Board, or PEB, may be established, which examines the parties’ positions and recommends a solution. The PEB process lasts for 30 days and is followed by another “cooling off” period of 30 days. At the end of the
“cooling off” periods, unless an agreement is reached or action is taken by Congress, the labor organization and the airline each may resort to “self-help,” including, for the labor organization, a strike or other labor action, and for the airline, the imposition of any or all of its proposed amendments and the hiring of new employees to replace any striking workers. Congress and the President have the authority to prevent “self-help” by enacting legislation that, among other things, imposes a settlement on the parties. The table below sets forth our employee groups and status of their collective bargaining agreements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee Groups | | Representative | | Amendable Date (1) |
Pilots | | Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) (2) | | March 2024 |
Flight Attendants | | Association of Flight Attendants (AFA-CWA) | | January 2026 |
Dispatchers | | Professional Airline Flight Control Association (PAFCA) | | August 2026 |
Ramp Service Agents | | International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW) | | November 2026 |
Passenger Service Agents | | Transport Workers Union of America (TWU) | | February 2027 |
Aircraft Maintenance Technicians | | Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA) (2) | | N/A |
(1) Subject to standard early opener provisions.
(2) Collective bargaining agreement is currently under negotiation.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, we reached an agreement with ALPA for a new two-year agreement, which was ratified by ALPA members on January 10, 2023. The ratified agreement includes increased pay rates and other enhanced benefits. In March 2024, ALPA provided notice to us that it intended to amend its CBA with its pilots. In July 2024, the parties began negotiations, and those discussions are ongoing.
In June 2021, the AFA-CWA notified us, as required by the RLA, that it intended to submit proposed changes to the collective bargaining agreement covering our flight attendants. We commenced negotiations with the AFA-CWA on September 27, 2021. In February 2023, we reached an agreement with our flight attendants which was ratified by the flight attendants on April 13, 2023 and becomes amendable in January 2026. The ratified agreement includes increased pay rates and other enhanced benefits.
In May 2023, PAFCA provided notice that it intends to amend its Collective Bargaining Agreement with our dispatchers. The parties began negotiating changes to the CBA on July 12, 2023. In July 2024, we reached an agreement with PAFCA for a new two-year agreement, which was ratified by PAFCA members on August 10, 2024. The ratified agreement includes increased pay rates.
Our ramp service agents are represented by IAMAW. Representation only applies to our Fort Lauderdale station where we have direct employees in the ramp service agent classification. In February 2020, the IAMAW notified us, as required by the RLA, that it intended to submit proposed changes to the collective bargaining agreement covering our ramp service agents which became amendable in June 2020. On September 28, 2021, we filed an “Application for Mediation Services” with the NMB. We were able to reach a tentative agreement with the IAMAW with the assistance of the NMB on October 16, 2021. Our ramp service agents ratified the five-year agreement in November 2021.
In June 2018, our passenger service agents voted to be represented by the TWU, but the representation only applies to our Fort Lauderdale station where we have direct employees in the passenger service classification. We began meeting with the TWU in late October 2018 to negotiate an initial collective bargaining agreement. During February 2022, we reached a tentative agreement with the TWU. Our passenger service agents ratified the five-year agreement on February 21, 2022.
In August 2022, our aircraft maintenance technicians (“AMTs”) voted to be represented by AMFA as their collective bargaining agent. In November 2022, AMFA notified us of its intent to negotiate a CBA and began negotiations. In October
2023, AMFA filed for mediation with the NMB. In May 2024, the parties began negotiations with a NMB mediation, and those discussions are ongoing. As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately 640 AMTs.
To ensure that we have the right level of resources to meet our reduced aircraft capacity levels, primarily due to increased AOG days from GTF engine issues and the sale of aircraft, we furloughed approximately 170 pilots, effective September 1, 2024, and announced in the fourth quarter of 2024 that, effective January 31, 2025, we would furlough approximately 300 additional pilots to match our projected flight volume for 2025. During the third and fourth quarters of 2024, we recorded $1.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively, in expenses related to these furloughs. These expenses were recorded within salaries, wages and benefits on our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, in January 2025, as part of our ongoing
efforts to optimize and enhance efficiencies, we made the decision to eliminate approximately 200 positions from various departments.
Safety and Security
We are committed to the safety and security of our passengers and employees. We strive to comply with or exceed health and safety regulation standards. In pursuing these goals, we maintain an active aviation safety program. All of our personnel are expected to participate in the program and take an active role in the identification, reduction and elimination of hazards.
Our ongoing focus on safety relies on training our employees to proper standards and providing them with the tools and equipment they require so they can perform their job functions in a safe and efficient manner. Safety in the workplace targets several areas of our business, including: flight operations, maintenance, in-flight, dispatch and station operations. The Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”), is charged with aviation security for both airlines and airports. We maintain active, open lines of communication with the TSA at all of our locations to ensure proper standards for security of our personnel, customers, equipment and facilities are exercised throughout our business.
Insurance
We maintain insurance policies we believe are customary in the airline industry and as required by the Department of Transportation (“DOT”). The policies principally provide liability coverage for public and passenger injury; damage to property; loss of or damage to flight equipment; fire and extended coverage; war risk (terrorism); directors’ and officers’ liability; advertiser and media liability; cyber risk liability; fiduciary; and workers’ compensation and employer’s liability. Renewing coverage could result in a change in premium and more restrictive terms. Although we currently believe our insurance coverage is adequate, there can be no assurance that the amount of such coverage will not be changed or that we will not be forced to bear substantial losses from accidents.
Management Information Systems
We have continued our commitment to technology improvements to support our ongoing operations and initiatives. In 2022, we targeted the modernization of our crew applications and technologies to accelerate the response to irregular operations. These improvements involved upgrades to the main flight operations system, enabling and enhancing chat functionality for our crews, improving crew scheduling voice response, and providing real time operational monitoring capabilities. In addition to operations, we have made significant improvements to our digital transformation for Guest experience through the implementation of our customer data platform. We have successfully migrated our maintenance and flight operation systems to the Azure cloud.
In 2023, we continued our technology modernization with a new mobile workplace application for the Flight Attendant team. This application improves the experience for streamlining daily tasks such as check-in, assigning positions, viewing manifests and personal work schedules. Our digital transformation journey added capabilities providing self-service options to our Guests and employees such as refund automation, flight status, employee benefits and more. In 2023, we matured our cyber security programs within the CIS v8 framework as we refined our environments to meet the rapidly changing cyber threat landscape. One major focus was providing a more frequent cycle of timely and consistent cyber security awareness to our team members. The cloud strategy continues to evolve as operational and cyber security imperatives guide us, migration of services and data continues in our multi-region footprint and we have begun planning for a diverse cloud provider strategy.
In 2024, we have continued our modernization and consolidation efforts for all crew applications, centralizing critical functions and information for our Gate Agents, Pilots and Flight Attendants into a single platform. This initiative has replaced multiple applications, manual processes and forms. Key releases include Flight Status, Manifest Improvements supporting our transformation, Gate View for turn optimization identifying connecting passengers and Jumpseat capabilities.
In a groundbreaking achievement, we leveraged our enterprise service bus architecture this year, making us the first airline to successfully collaborate with the TSA. This collaboration established a direct connection to the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) server for the Aviation Employee Vetting (“AEV”), Master Crew List (“MCL”), and Flight Crew Manifest (“FCM”) processes. As a result, our crew members can now pass through airport security much faster by eliminating the teletype communication methodology.
This year, we transformed our product model by rapidly delivering solutions in collaboration with our business teams. We implemented changes that promote brand consistency, offer new elevated options, and introduce streamlined processes both at airports and inflight. The standardization across all customer touchpoints and operations has simplified the management and adaptation of established reusable components.
Additionally, we have successfully migrated our core critical IT systems, including our hosted reservation system to the Azure cloud. This move enhances our disaster recovery capabilities and strengthens cybersecurity. We also completed our first DHS/TSA cybersecurity audit for critical infrastructure, with no findings.
Foreign Ownership
Under DOT regulations and federal law, we must be owned and controlled by U.S. citizens. In order to qualify, at least 75% of our stock must be voted by U.S. citizens, 51% of our outstanding equity must be owned by U.S. citizens, and our president and at least two-thirds of our board of directors (the “Board”) and senior management must be U.S. citizens.
We believe we are currently in compliance with such foreign ownership rules.
Government Regulation
Operational Regulation
The airline industry is heavily regulated, especially by the federal government. Two of the primary regulatory authorities overseeing air transportation in the United States are the DOT and the FAA. The DOT has jurisdiction over economic and consumer issues affecting air transportation, such as competition, route authorizations, advertising and sales practices, baggage liability, disabled passenger transportation, reporting of mishandled bags, tarmac delays and responding to customer complaints among other areas.
In July 2021, the DOT issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) requiring airlines to refund checked bag fees for delayed bags if they are not delivered to the passenger within a specified number of hours and refunding ancillary fees for services related to air travel that passengers did not receive.
In November 2021, the DOT reopened the comment period on an NPRM regarding short-term improvements to lavatory accessibility, including new proposed requirements for onboard wheelchairs (OBWs) (Part 1). This NPRM was to gather information about all aspects of OBW design, including stowage, before issuing any final binding regulation on the topic.
In March 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM (Part 2) requiring airlines to ensure that at least one lavatory on new single-aisle aircraft with at least 125 passenger seats is large enough to permit a passenger with a disability (with the help of an assistant, if necessary) to approach, enter and maneuver within the lavatory, as necessary, to use all lavatory facilities and to leave by means of the aircraft’s on-board wheel-chair. If enacted as currently proposed, this NPRM (Part 2) would apply to new aircraft ordered 18 years or delivered 20 years after the effective date of a final rule. The DOT published its Accessible Lavatories on Single-Aisle Aircraft final rule on August 1, 2023, which became effective October 2, 2023. Among other requirements, the final rule requires new single-aisle aircraft with 125 seats or more that are ordered 10 years after or delivered 12 years after October 2, 2023, or on new type-certificated aircraft designs filed 1 year after the effective date, to have accessible lavatories.
In July 2022, the DOT published its Airline Passengers with Disabilities Bill of Rights, applicable to U.S. and foreign carriers, and required airlines to publish the same on their websites with appropriate email notifications sent to passengers with disabilities. The DOT continues to review potential rules regarding disabled passengers, including a NPRM scheduled to be released next year regarding wheelchair handling and training initiatives.
In July 2022, the Office of Aviation Consumer Protection (“OACP”) issued a notice urging airlines to provide seats to children 13 years or younger with an adult on the same booking with no additional charge. In response to the OACP’s notice during 2023, the DOT added to their website a Child Seating dashboard comparing reporting carriers and their procedures on seating children 13 years or younger with an adult on a booking.
In August 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM requiring airlines and ticket agents to provide non-expiring travel vouchers or credits to consumers holding non-refundable tickets for scheduled flights to, from, or within the United States as a result of the carrier cancelling or making a significant change to a scheduled flight, a serious communicable disease or for several other reasons. The NPRM will further define the terms “significant change” and “cancellation” and will require airlines and ticket agents to provide refunds if they receive significant financial assistance from the government as a result of a public health emergency. The DOT published its final rule on April 26, 2024 and the effective date is June 25, 2024. The DOT requires automatic refunds to consumers when an air carrier cancels or makes a significant change to a scheduled flight to, from, or within the United States and the consumer is not offered or rejects alternative transportation and travel credits, vouchers, or other compensation. Subsequent to publication of the final rule, the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 (the “Act”) was signed into law on May 16, 2024, and on August 12, 2024 DOT issued an amended final rule consistent with the requirements of the Act.
At the end of August 2022, the DOT added an Airline Customer Service Dashboard to their website that compares what reporting carriers offer passengers during a significant controllable delay or cancellation.
In October 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM which would require airlines to increase disclosure of bag fees, change and cancellation fees, and family seating policies during the ticket purchase process in an effort to improve the transparency of airline pricing. The comment period closed on January 23, 2023. The DOT published its Enhancing Transparency of Airline Ancillary Services Fee final rule on April 30, 2024. A federal court of appeals has stayed the rule pending its review of legal challenges to the rule’s lawfulness. On January 28, 2025, the court of appeals ruled that the DOT failed to fully comply with requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act and remanded the rule to the DOT. Among other requirements, the final rule would require air carriers and ticket agents to clearly disclose on their websites, whenever fare and schedule information is provided for flights to, within and from the United States, passenger-specific or itinerary-specific prices for certain ancillary services if those services are not included in the advertised fare price. We cannot forecast the effect of this final rule, if it goes into effect, on our costs and operations.
Additional rules and executive orders, including those pertaining to disabled passengers, may be issued. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Industry—Restrictions on, or increased taxes applicable to, charges for ancillary products and services paid by airline passengers and burdensome consumer protection regulations or laws could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.”
The DOT has authority to issue certificates of public convenience and necessity required for airlines to provide air transportation. We hold a DOT certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing us to engage in scheduled air transportation of passengers, property and mail within the United States, its territories and possessions and between the United States and all countries that maintain a liberal aviation trade relationship with the United States (known as “open skies” countries). We also hold DOT certificates to engage in air transportation to certain other countries with more restrictive aviation policies.
The FAA is responsible for regulating and overseeing matters relating to air carrier flight operations, including airline operating certificates, aircraft certification and maintenance and other matters affecting air safety, including rest periods and work hours for all airlines certificated under Part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. The FAA requires each commercial airline to obtain and hold an FAA air carrier certificate. This certificate, in combination with operations specifications issued to the airline by the FAA, authorizes the airline to operate at specific airports using aircraft approved by the FAA. As of December 31, 2024, we had FAA airworthiness certificates for all of our aircraft, we had obtained the necessary FAA authority to fly to all of the cities we currently serve and all of our aircraft had been certified for overwater operations. Any new or revised operational regulations in the future could result in further increased costs. We believe we hold all necessary operating and airworthiness authorizations, certificates and licenses and are operating in compliance with applicable DOT and FAA regulations, interpretations and policies.
On June 6, 2023, the FAA issued a final rule which requires aircraft manufactured two years after August 25, 2023, which are operated in domestic commercial service by Part 121 airlines to have an installed physical secondary barrier that protects the flightdeck from unauthorized intrusion when the flightdeck door is opened. We are currently evaluating the impacts, if any, of the ruling, which we do not expect to be material.
On August 9, 2024, the DOT proposed a rule which would require airlines to seat children aged 13 and under adjacent to at least one accompanying adult at no additional cost beyond the fare, subject to limited exceptions. Under the proposed rule, an airline’s failure to provide family seating would subject it to civil penalties on a per passenger (child) basis, and if the carrier charged families a fee beyond the fare to secure family seating, the carrier would be subject to civil penalties for each fee imposed. The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on November 7, 2024, and no further action has been taken by DOT.
On December 5, 2024, the DOT announced a new rulemaking initiative to adopt and adhere to customer service plans identifying essential services and compensation. Under the rule, airlines would be required to mitigate passenger inconveniences when the cause of a cancellation or delay for flights to, within and from the United States was due to circumstances within the airline's control. Airlines would be required to pay passengers cash compensation, rebook them for free on the next available flight, and cover meals, overnight lodging, and related transportation expenses when a disruption is airline-caused, such as a mechanical issue or an IT system breakdown. The Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “ANPRM”) seeks public comment on the requirements.
On December 17, 2024, the DOT issued a final rule to increase access to safe and dignified air travel for individuals with disabilities, particularly those who use a wheelchair or scooter. The final rule became effective on January 16, 2025. The rule imposes requirements on airlines pertaining to how they assist passengers with disabilities and handle wheelchairs and other assistive devices. Under the final rule, airlines are required to provide information to passengers with wheelchairs or scooters prior to departure, upon arrival, and when their wheelchair or scooter is mishandled, and to reimburse passengers for certain costs and expenses if the airline delays the return of, mishandles, or causes damage to a passenger’s wheelchair or scooter.
International Regulation
All international service is subject to the regulatory requirements of the foreign government involved. We generally offer international service to Aruba, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru and St. Maarten, as well as Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. If we decide to increase our routes to additional international destinations, we will be required to obtain necessary authority from the DOT and the applicable foreign government. We are also required to comply with overfly regulations in countries that lay along our routes but which we do not serve.
International service is also subject to Customs and Border Protection, or CBP, immigration and agriculture requirements and the requirements of equivalent foreign governmental agencies. Like other airlines flying international routes, from time to time we may be subject to civil fines and penalties imposed by CBP if unmanifested or illegal cargo, such as illegal narcotics, is found on our aircraft. These fines and penalties, which in the case of narcotics are based upon the retail value of the seizure, may be substantial. We have implemented a comprehensive security program at our airports to reduce the risk of illegal cargo being placed on our aircraft, and we seek to cooperate actively with CBP and other U.S. and foreign law enforcement agencies in investigating incidents or attempts to introduce illegal cargo.
International Service is also subject to special federal aviation regulations (“SFARs”) and other restrictions issued by the FAA which prohibit flight operations in particular areas or situations due to safety or security concerns. On November 12, 2024, the FAA issued an SFAR prohibiting certain flights in the territory and airspace of Haiti for 30 days. On December 11, 2024, the FAA extended the Haiti flight prohibitions through March 12, 2025.
We will continue to comply with all contagious disease requirements issued by the US and foreign governments, but we cannot forecast what additional requirements may be imposed in the future or the costs or revenue impact that would be associated with complying with such requirements. See, “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We are subject to extensive and increasing regulation by the FAA, DOT, TSA and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies, compliance with which could cause us to incur increased costs and adversely affect our business and financial results.”
Security Regulation
The TSA was created in 2001 with the responsibility and authority to oversee the implementation and ensure the adequacy of security measures at airports and other transportation facilities. Funding for passenger security is provided in part by a per enplanement ticket tax (passenger security fee); which as of December 19, 2014, was limited to a round-trip fee of $11.20. We cannot forecast what additional security and safety requirements may be imposed in the future or the costs or revenue impact that would be associated with complying with such requirements.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and affecting matters such as aircraft engine emissions, aircraft noise emissions and the discharge or disposal of materials and chemicals, which laws and regulations are administered by numerous state and federal agencies. The Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, regulates operations, including air carrier operations, which affect the quality of air in the United States. We believe the aircraft in our fleet meet all emission standards issued by the EPA. Concern about climate change and greenhouse gases may result in additional regulation or taxation of aircraft emissions in the United States and abroad.
Federal law recognizes the right of airport operators with special noise problems to implement local noise abatement procedures so long as those procedures do not interfere unreasonably with interstate and foreign commerce and the national air transportation system. These restrictions can include limiting nighttime operations, directing specific aircraft operational procedures during takeoff and initial climb, and limiting the overall number of flights at an airport.
Other Regulations
We are subject to certain provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and are required to obtain an aeronautical radio license from the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC. To the extent we are subject to FCC requirements, we will take all necessary steps to comply with those requirements. We are also subject to state and local laws and regulations at locations where we operate and the regulations of various local authorities that operate the airports we serve. In addition, we are subject to the deployment of new 5G C-band service by wireless communications providers.
On May 26, 2023, the FAA issued a final rule for an airworthiness directive under which transport and commuter category airplanes, including those operated under 14 CFR Part 121, are required to have 5G C-Band-tolerant radio altimeters or filters installed by February 1, 2024.
The FAA, collaborating with the aviation sector and wireless providers, has completed work to ensure that radio signals from newly activated wireless telecommunications systems can coexist safely with flight operations in the United States until at least January 1, 2028. Voluntary mitigations by the telecommunication operators, combined with aircraft radio altimeter retrofits by aviation operators, have resulted in the fielding of 5G C-Band with minimized impacts that are acceptable to both industries.
Future Regulations
The U.S. and foreign governments may consider and adopt new laws, regulations, interpretations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters that could directly or indirectly affect our results of operations. We cannot predict what laws, regulations, interpretations and policies might be considered in the future, nor can we judge what impact, if any, the implementation of any of these proposals or changes might have on our business.
Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability
We recognize aviation’s impact on climate and our responsibility to help reduce the carbon footprint of air travel. Fuel burn is our greatest environmental and financial impact, and our greatest source of carbon emissions. To address the impact of our flights and operations over the short-term and long-term, our climate and emissions approach focuses on reducing emissions through both fleet and operational efficiencies that conserve fuel and improve overall fuel burn. Our all-Airbus fleet is one of the youngest in the United States and our dense seating configuration, along with our consistent focus on weight-saving measures, has made us consistently one of the most fuel-efficient carriers in the United States on both an absolute and per-seat basis.
Further illustrating our commitment, during the fourth quarter of 2023, we issued our 2021/2022 Sustainability Report, showing results of our longstanding commitment to meaningful advancements in environmental sustainability, Guest and community service, Team Member support, and governance. The report highlights our plan for continued progress in broadening ESG initiatives and improving communities. Refer to “Spirit’s 2021/2022 Sustainability Report” on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.spirit.com.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. All statements other than statements of historical facts are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential,” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements. Additional risks or uncertainties (i) that are not currently known to us, (ii) that we currently deem to be immaterial, or (iii) that could apply to any company, could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or future results. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this report. If any of the following risks materialize, our business could be materially harmed, and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. References in this report to “Spirit,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” shall mean Spirit Airlines, Inc., unless the context indicates otherwise.
Risk Factor Summary
Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that you should understand before making an investment
decision. These risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
•The competitiveness of our industry;
•Volatility in fuel costs or significant disruptions in the supply of fuel;
•Adverse domestic or global economic conditions on our business, results of operations and financial condition, including our ability to obtain financing or access capital markets;
•Factors beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports, air traffic control inefficiencies, major construction or improvements at airports, adverse weather conditions, increased security measures, new travel related taxes or the outbreak of disease;
•Increased labor costs, union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruption;
•Our maintenance costs, which will increase as our fleet ages;
•The extensive regulation by the FAA, DOT, TSA and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies to which we are subject;
•Our reliance on technology and automated systems to operate our business;
•Our reliance on third-party service providers to perform functions integral to our operations, including ground handling, fuel, catering, passenger handling, engineering, maintenance, refueling, reservations and other services;
•Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers for our aircraft and engines;
•Reduction in demand for air transportation, or governmental reduction or limitation of operating capacity, in the domestic U.S., Caribbean or Latin American markets;
•The success of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club®;
•Our significant amount of aircraft-related fixed obligations and additional debt that we have incurred, and may incur in the future;
•Our ability to maintain relationships with our general unsecured creditors, employees, customers, vendors, suppliers, aircraft lessors, holders of secured aircraft indebtedness and other third parties;
•Our ability to attract and retain key personnel; and
•Our ability to compete effectively during the transition to a new board of directors.
Risks Related to Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
We are in the process of Chapter 11 reorganization cases under the Bankruptcy Code, which has and will continue to cause our common stock to decrease in value and will eventually render our common stock worthless.
As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) on the Petition Date, we commenced a voluntary case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. Under the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement, certain of our subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 25, 2024. Any trading in our common stock during the pendency of our Chapter 11 Cases is highly speculative and poses substantial risks to purchasers of our common stock, as the price of our common stock has and will continue to decrease in value and become worthless. As contemplated under the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement, no recovery is expected for holders of our common stock in the Chapter 11 Cases.
We are subject to other risks and uncertainties associated with our Chapter 11 Cases.
Our operations and ability to develop and execute our business plan, our financial condition, our liquidity and our continuation as a going concern are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with our Chapter 11 Cases. These risks include the following:
•our ability to consummate a plan of reorganization with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases;
•the high costs of bankruptcy cases and related fees;
•the imposition of restrictions or obligations on the Company by regulators related to the bankruptcy and emergence from Chapter 11;
•our ability to obtain sufficient financing to allow us to emerge from bankruptcy and execute our business plan post-emergence;
•Bankruptcy Court rulings in the Chapter 11 Cases, as well as the outcome of all other pending litigation and the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases generally;
•our ability to maintain our relationships with our general unsecured creditors, employees, customers, vendors, suppliers, aircraft lessors, holders of secured aircraft indebtedness and other third parties;
•our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operations;
•our ability to execute competitive contracts with third parties;
•our ability to attract, motivate, and retain key employees;
•the ability of third parties to seek and obtain court approval to terminate contracts and other agreements with us;
•our ability to retain our current management team; and
•the actions and decisions of our stockholders, creditors and other third parties who have interests in our Chapter 11 Cases that may be inconsistent with our plans.
Delays in our Chapter 11 Cases increase the risks of us being unable to reorganize our business and emerge from bankruptcy and increase our costs associated with the bankruptcy process.
These risks and uncertainties could affect our business and operations in various ways. For example, negative events or publicity associated with our Chapter 11 Cases could adversely affect our relationships with our general unsecured creditors, employees, customers, vendors, suppliers, aircraft lessors, holders of secured aircraft indebtedness and other third parties, which, in turn, could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. Also, pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, we need the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court for transactions outside the ordinary course of business, which may limit our ability to respond timely to certain events or take advantage of certain opportunities. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with our Chapter 11 Cases, we cannot accurately predict or quantify the ultimate impact or timing of events that occur during our Chapter 11 Cases and the impact that those events will have on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, there is no certainty as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
If the Restructuring Support Agreement is terminated, our ability to consummate the Plan may be materially and adversely affected.
On November 18, 2024, Spirit and the Supporting Stakeholders entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement. The Restructuring Support Agreement contains a number of termination events, some of which would grant the Supporting Stakeholders the right to terminate such Restructuring Support Agreement, which could adversely affect our ability to consummate the Plan. Such termination events include, but are not limited to, for example: (i) the breach in any material respect by any Company Party of any of the representations, warranties, covenants or obligations of such party, (ii) a motion to avoid, disallow, subordinate, or recharacterize the Intercompany Claim (as defined in the Restructuring Support Agreement), (iii) a withdrawal from the Plan or Disclosure Statement (as defined in the Restructuring Support Agreement), (iv) any order approving the Plan or the Disclosure Statement is appealed, reversed, stayed, dismissed, vacated, reconsidered or modified as detailed in the Restructuring Support Agreement or (v) a failure to meet certain milestones as detailed in the Restructuring Support Agreement. If the Restructuring Support Agreement is terminated, we may be unable to consummate the Plan, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to enter into a new plan or that any new plan would be as favorable to holders of claims as the Plan. In addition, any Chapter 11 Cases may become protracted, which could significantly and detrimentally impact our relationships with our general unsecured creditors, employees, customers, vendors, suppliers, aircraft lessors, holders of secured aircraft indebtedness and other third parties. Even once the Plan is consummated, our operating results may be adversely affected by the possible reluctance of prospective lenders and other counterparties to do business with a company that recently emerged from Chapter 11 protection.
The Plan is based in large part upon assumptions and analyses developed by us. If these assumptions and analyses prove to be incorrect, we may not be able to achieve our stated goals and continue as a going concern.
The Plan will affect both our capital structure and the ownership, structure and operation of our business and reflects assumptions and analyses based on our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that we consider appropriate under the circumstances. In addition, the Plan relies upon financial projections developed by us with the assistance of our financial advisor, including with respect to fees, revenues, debt service, and cash flow. Financial forecasts are necessarily speculative, and it is likely that one or more of the assumptions and estimates that are the basis of these financial forecasts will not be accurate. Whether actual future results and developments will be consistent with our expectations and assumptions depends on a number of factors, including but not limited to (i) our ability to substantially change our capital structure, (ii) our ability to obtain adequate liquidity and financing sources, (iii) our ability to maintain customers’, vendors’, suppliers’, aircraft lessors’ and other third parties' confidence in our viability as a continuing enterprise and to attract and retain sufficient business from and partnership endeavors with them, (iv) our ability to retain key employees and (v) the overall strength and stability of general economic conditions. The failure of any of these factors could materially adversely affect the successful reorganization of our business and the value of the Company. Consequently, at this time, there can be no assurance that the results or developments that are contemplated the Plan, will occur or, even if they do occur, that they will have the anticipated effects on us and our subsidiaries or our businesses or operations. The failure of any such results or developments to materialize as anticipated could materially adversely affect the successful execution of the Plan.
Even if the Plan is consummated, we may not be able to achieve our stated goals and continue as a going concern.
Even if the Plan is consummated, we will continue to face a number of risks that are beyond our control, such as changes in economic conditions, changes in the financial markets, changes in investment values or the industry in general, changes in demand for our products and increasing expenses. Some of these risks typically become more acute when a case under the Bankruptcy Code continues for a protracted period of time without indication of how or when the transactions under a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will close.
Further, our corporate business strategy is subject to continued development, evaluation and implementation by our management and Board. In connection with the Plan, the Board is expected to be reconstituted, and, following emergence, the Board is expected to be made up of seven directors, of which six directors will not have served on the former Board and will be selected by the Senior Secured Noteholders and Convertible Noteholders pursuant to the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement. The new directors may have different backgrounds, experiences and perspectives from those individuals who previously served on the Board at the time of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases and, thus, may have different views on the issues that will determine our future, including our strategic plans and priorities. The Board, as reconstituted, may determine, from time to time, to implement changes in our business strategy which may affect our operations. There is, however, no guarantee that the strategic initiatives and plans, whether current or future, of the Board will be implemented in a timely manner or at all and, consequently, there is no guarantee that the operational and financial objectives of the reconstituted Board will be achieved in a timely manner or at all.
In addition, even after we emerge from bankruptcy, our having recently filed for bankruptcy could adversely affect our business and relationships with our general unsecured creditors, employees, customers, vendors, suppliers, aircraft lessors,
holders of secured aircraft indebtedness and other third parties. Due to uncertainties, many risks exist even after emergence from bankruptcy, including the following:
•the ability to attract, motivate and/or retain key executives and employees may be adversely affected;
•employees may be more easily attracted to other employment opportunities; and
•competitors may take business away from us, and our ability to retain customers may be negatively impacted.
The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material and adverse effect on our operations, financial condition and reputation, and we cannot assure you that having been subject to bankruptcy proceedings will not adversely affect our operations in the future. As a result of these and other risks, we cannot guarantee that the Plan will achieve our stated goals.
Finally, even if our current debts are reduced or discharged through the Plan, we expect to have substantial indebtedness following consummation of the Plan, which may limit our operating flexibility going forward. Our indebtedness following consummation of the Plan will also subject us to certain restrictive covenants. Failure by us to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us and result in amounts outstanding thereunder to be immediately due and payable. If we are unable to pay amounts due under our indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs, such as future capital expenditures or contingent liabilities as a result of adverse business developments, including expenses related to future legal proceedings and governmental investigations or decreased revenues, as well as increased pricing pressures or otherwise, we may need to raise additional funds through one or more public or private debt or equity financings or other means to fund our business after the completion of the Chapter 11 Cases. Our access to additional capital may be limited, if it is available at all, particularly in light of the recent bankruptcy proceedings. Therefore, adequate funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on favorable terms. As a result of these and other risks, we cannot guarantee that the Plan will achieve our stated goals, and, thus, we cannot assure you of our ability to continue as a going concern after our expected emergence from bankruptcy.
The DIP Facility has substantial restrictions and covenants and if we are unable to comply with the covenant requirements under the DIP Facility, it could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
If the Company Parties are unable to comply with the requirements under the DIP Facility, it could prevent them from drawing funds thereunder and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
We may be subject to claims that will not be discharged in the Chapter 11 Cases, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
The Bankruptcy Code provides that the confirmation of a plan of reorganization discharges a debtor from, among other things, substantially all debts arising prior to consummation of a plan of reorganization. Thus, while generally all claims against us that arose prior to the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases or before consummation of the Plan (i) would be subject to compromise and/or treatment under the Plan and/or (ii) would be discharged in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the terms of the Plan, certain exceptions may arise. Subject to the terms of the Plan and orders of the Bankruptcy Court, any claims not ultimately discharged pursuant to the Plan could be asserted against us and may have an adverse effect on our business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations on a post-reorganization basis.
Changes to our capital structure may have a material adverse effect on existing and future debt and security holders, and will adversely impact holders of our common stock.
Pursuant to the Plan, our post-bankruptcy capital structure will change significantly. The reorganization of our capital structure pursuant to the Plan includes exchanges of new debt or equity securities for our existing debt and claims against us. Such new debt will be issued at different interest rates, payment schedules and maturities than our existing debt securities. As contemplated under the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement, no recovery is expected for holders of our common stock in Chapter 11 Cases. There can be no guarantees regarding the success of changes to our capital structure. Holders of our debt or of claims against us may find their holdings no longer have any value or are materially reduced in value, or they may be converted to equity and be diluted or may be modified or replaced by debt with a principal amount that is less than the outstanding principal amount, longer maturities and reduced interest rates. Our existing equity securities will no longer have any value and holders of such existing equity securities will receive no recovery under the Plan. There can be no assurance that any new debt or equity securities will maintain their value at the time of issuance. If existing debt or equity holders are adversely affected by a reorganization, it may adversely affect our ability to issue new debt or equity in the future.
The negotiations regarding the Restructuring have consumed and will continue to consume a substantial portion of the time and attention of our management, which may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations, and we may face increased levels of employee attrition.
Our management has spent, and continues to be required to spend, a significant amount of time and effort focusing on the Restructuring. This diversion of attention may have a material adverse effect on the conduct of our business, and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations, particularly if the Restructuring and the Chapter 11 Cases are protracted. During the pendency of the Restructuring, our employees will face considerable distraction and uncertainty, and we may experience increased levels of employee attrition. A loss of key personnel or material erosion of employee morale could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to meet customer expectations, thereby adversely affecting our business and results of operations. The failure to retain or attract members of our management team and other key personnel could impair our ability to execute our strategy and implement operational initiatives, thereby having a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, we could experience losses of customers, vendors, suppliers and aircraft lessors who may be concerned about our ongoing long-term viability.
Our long-term liquidity requirements and the adequacy of our capital resources are difficult to predict at this time.
We face uncertainty regarding the adequacy of our liquidity and capital resources. In addition to the cash requirements necessary to fund ongoing operations, we have incurred significant professional fees and other costs in connection with preparation for the Chapter 11 Cases and expect that we will continue to incur significant professional fees and costs throughout our Chapter 11 Cases. We cannot assure that cash on hand, cash flow from operations and the DIP Facility will be sufficient to continue to fund our operations and allow us to satisfy our obligations related to the Chapter 11 Cases until we are able to emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases.
Our liquidity, including our ability to meet our ongoing operational obligations, is dependent upon, among other things: (i) our ability to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement governing the DIP Facility and associated agreements, (ii) our ability to comply with the terms and conditions of any cash collateral order that may be entered by the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, (iii) our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand, (iv) our ability to generate cash flow from operations, (v) our ability to develop, confirm and consummate a chapter 11 plan or other alternative restructuring transaction and (vi) the cost, duration and outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases.
Our actual financial results after emergence from bankruptcy may not be comparable to our projections filed with the Bankruptcy Court in the course of the Chapter 11 Cases.
In connection with the disclosure statement we filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan, we prepared projected financial information to demonstrate to the Bankruptcy Court the feasibility of the Plan and our ability to continue operations upon our emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases. Those projections were prepared solely for the purpose of the Chapter 11 Cases and have not been and will not be updated and should not be relied upon by investors. At the time they were prepared, the projections reflected numerous assumptions concerning our anticipated future performance with respect to then prevailing and anticipated market and economic conditions that were and remain beyond our control and that may not materialize. We have not updated the projections prepared solely for the purpose of the Chapter 11 Cases or the assumptions on which they were based after our emergence. Projections are inherently subject to substantial and numerous uncertainties and to a wide variety of significant business, economic and competitive risks, and the assumptions underlying the projections or valuation estimates may prove to be wrong in material respects. Actual results may vary significantly from those contemplated by the projections. As a result, investors should not rely on these projections.
As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, our historical financial information may not be indicative of our future financial performance, which may be volatile.
During the Chapter 11 Cases, we expect our financial results to be volatile as restructuring activities and expenses, contract terminations and rejections, and claims assessments significantly impact our consolidated financial statements. As a result, our historical financial performance is likely not indicative of our financial performance after the date of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases.
Our common stock has been delisted from NYSE and there is no guarantee that our common stock will be regularly traded on the over-the-counter markets.
On November 18, 2024, we received the Delisting Notice from the NYSE notifying us that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases and in accordance with the NYSE Listing company Manual Section 802.01D, NYSE had determined that our common stock will be delisted from NYSE and trading of our common stock was suspended immediately. On December 5, 2024, NYSE filed a Form 25 for us in connection with the delisting of our shares of common stock from NYSE. The delisting became effective ten days after the Form 25 was filed. Delisting has had an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock and, as a result, it is more difficult for you to sell or otherwise transact in our common stock. Delisting also reduces the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common stock and negatively impacts our ability to access equity markets and obtain financing.
In accordance with Rule 12d2-2 of the Exchange Act, the de-registration of our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act will become effective 90 days after the date the Form 25 was filed.
Following the suspension of trading on the NYSE, our common stock has been quoted in the OTC Pink Open Market. The OTC Pink Open Market is a significantly more limited market than NYSE, and quotation on the OTC Pink Open Market has resulted in a less liquid market for existing and potential holders of the common stock to trade our common stock and could further depress the trading price of our common stock. There is no guarantee that our common stock will continue to be traded on the over-the-counter markets, and accordingly, our common stock may become illiquid. We can provide no assurance as to whether broker-dealers will continue to provide public quotes of the common stock on this market, or whether the trading volume of the common stock will be sufficient to provide for an efficient trading market.
Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) may become subject to limitation, or may be reduced or eliminated, in connection with the implementation of the Plan. The Bankruptcy Court has entered an order that is designed to protect our NOLs until the Plan is consummated.
Under U.S. federal income tax law, a corporation is generally permitted to deduct from taxable income NOLs carried forward from prior years. To date, we have generated a significant amount of U.S. federal NOLs.
Our ability to utilize our NOLs to offset future taxable income and to reduce our U.S. federal income tax liability is subject to certain requirements and restrictions. If a corporation with NOLs undergoes an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), then such corporation's use of such “pre-change” NOLs to offset income incurred following such ownership change generally will be subject to an annual limitation specified in Section 382 of the Code. Such limitation also may apply to certain losses or deductions that are “built-in” (i.e., attributable to periods prior to the ownership change, but not yet taken into account for tax purposes) as of the date of the ownership change that are subsequently recognized. An ownership change generally occurs when there is either (i) a shift in ownership involving one or more “5% shareholders,” or (ii) an “equity structure shift” and, as a result, the percentage of stock of the corporation owned by one or more 5% shareholders (based on value) has increased by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of stock of the corporation owned by such shareholders during the “testing period” (generally the three years preceding the testing date). If we experience an “ownership change,” our ability to use our NOLs may be substantially limited, which could increase the taxes paid by the Company. Although we are taking steps to limit risk of an ownership change before consummation of the Plan, there can be no assurance that these steps will be successful. Moreover, we expect to undergo an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code in connection with the consummation of the Plan.
In addition, our NOLs (and other tax attributes) may be subject to use in connection with the implementation of the Plan or reduction as a result of any cancellation of indebtedness income arising in connection with the implementation of the Plan. As such, at this time, there can be no assurance that we will have NOLs to offset future taxable income.
Risks Related to Our Industry
We operate in an extremely competitive industry.
We face significant competition with respect to routes, fares and services. Within the airline industry, we compete with traditional network airlines, other low-cost airlines and regional airlines on many of our routes. Competition in most of the destinations we presently serve is intense, sometimes due to the large number of carriers in those markets. Furthermore, other airlines may begin service or increase existing service on routes where we currently face little competition. Most of our competitors are larger than us and have significantly greater financial and other resources than we do.
The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting because once a flight is scheduled, airlines incur only nominal additional costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats. Increased fare or other price competition has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, our revenue generation. Moreover, many other
airlines have begun to unbundle services by charging separately for services such as baggage and advance seat selection. This unbundling and other cost reducing measures could enable competitor airlines to reduce fares on routes that we serve.
Airlines increase or decrease capacity in markets based on perceived profitability, market share objectives, competitive considerations and other reasons. Decisions by our competitors that increase overall industry capacity, or capacity dedicated to a particular domestic or foreign region, market or route, could have a material adverse impact on our business. If a traditional network airline were to successfully develop a low-cost structure, compete with us on price or if we were to experience increased competition from other low-cost carriers, our business could be materially adversely affected.
Many of the traditional network airlines in the United States have on one or more occasions initiated bankruptcy proceedings in attempts to restructure their debt and other obligations and reduce their operating costs. They also have completed large mergers that have increased their scale and share of the travel market. The mergers between AMR Corporation and US Airways Group, Inc., between Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines, between United Airlines and Continental Airlines, between Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways, and between Alaska Airlines and Virgin America, have created five large airlines, with substantial national and international networks which create a more challenging competitive environment for smaller airlines like us. In the future, there may be additional consolidation in our industry. For example, on September 18, 2024, Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines announced the successful completion of their merger. Any business combination could significantly alter industry conditions and competition within the airline industry, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
As we continue to evolve and transform our business model to include premium options, we expect to continue to face significant competition, including from competitors that have significantly greater financial and other resources, have more comprehensive networks and have more established loyalty programs.
The extremely competitive nature of the airline industry could prevent us from attaining the level of passenger traffic or maintaining the level of fares or revenues required to sustain profitable operations in new and existing markets and could impede our network strategy, which could harm our operating results. Due to our relatively small size, we are susceptible to fare competition or other competitive activities in one or more of the markets we serve, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our low-cost structure is one of our primary competitive advantages, and many factors could affect our ability to control our costs.
Our low-cost structure is one of our primary competitive advantages. However, we have limited control over many of our costs. For example, we have limited control over the price and availability of aircraft fuel, aviation insurance, airport costs and related infrastructure taxes, the cost of meeting changing regulatory requirements and our cost to access capital or financing. In addition, the compensation and benefit costs applicable to a significant portion of our employees are established by the terms of our collective bargaining agreements. We cannot guarantee we will be able to maintain a cost advantage over our competitors. If our cost structure increases and we are no longer able to maintain a sufficient cost advantage over our competitors, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The airline industry is heavily influenced by the price and availability of aircraft fuel. Continued volatility in fuel costs or significant disruptions in the supply of fuel, including hurricanes and other events affecting the Gulf Coast in particular, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Aircraft fuel costs represented approximately 24.6%, 31.1% and 34.1% of our total operating expenses for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As such, our operating results are significantly affected by changes in the availability and the cost of aircraft fuel, especially aircraft fuel refined in the U.S. Gulf Coast region, on which we are highly dependent. Both the cost and the availability of aircraft fuel are subject to many meteorological, economic and political factors and events occurring throughout the world, which we can neither control nor accurately predict. For example, a major hurricane making landfall along the Gulf Coast could disrupt oil production, refinery operations and pipeline capacity in that region, possibly resulting in significant increases in the price of aircraft fuel and diminished availability of aircraft fuel supply. Any disruption to oil production, refinery operations, or pipeline capacity in the Gulf Coast region could have a disproportionate impact on our operating results compared to other airlines that have more diversified fuel sources. Fuel prices also may be affected by geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions and events that are outside of our control, including volatility in the relative strength of the U.S. dollar, the currency in which oil is denominated. Instability within major oil producing regions, such as the Middle East and Venezuela, Russia's ongoing conflict in Ukraine, ongoing conflicts throughout the Middle East, changes in demand from major petroleum users such as China, and secular increases in competing energy sources are examples of these trends.
Aircraft fuel prices have been subject to high volatility, fluctuating substantially over the past several years. For example, our fuel prices spiked at a high of $3.82 per gallon, in the third quarter of 2022, and fell as low as $1.05 per gallon in the second quarter of 2020. We cannot predict the future availability, price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel. Due to the large proportion of aircraft fuel costs in our total operating cost base, even a relatively small increase or decrease in the price of aircraft fuel can have a significant negative impact on our operating costs or revenues and on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Fuel derivative activity, if any, may not reduce fuel costs.
From time to time, we may enter into fuel derivative contracts in order to mitigate the risk to our business from future volatility in fuel prices, refining risk between the price of crude oil and the price of refined jet fuel, and to manage the risk of increasing fuel prices. Our derivatives may generally consist of United States Gulf Coast jet fuel swaps (“jet fuel swaps”) and United States Gulf Coast jet fuel options (“jet fuel options”). Both jet fuel swaps and jet fuel options can be used at times to protect the refining risk between the price of crude oil and the price of refined jet fuel, and to manage the risk of increasing fuel prices. As of December 31, 2024, we had no outstanding jet fuel derivatives, and we have not engaged in fuel derivative activity since 2015. There can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into fuel derivative contracts in the future if we are required or choose to do so. In the past we have not had, and in the future we may not have, sufficient creditworthiness or liquidity to post the collateral necessary to hedge our fuel requirements. Our liquidity and general level of capital resources impacts our ability to hedge our fuel requirements. Even if we are able to hedge portions of our future fuel requirements, we cannot guarantee that our derivative contracts will provide sufficient protection against increased fuel costs or that our counterparties will be able to perform under our derivative contracts, such as in the case of a counterparty’s insolvency. Furthermore, our ability to react to the cost of fuel, absent hedging, is limited because we set the price of tickets in advance of incurring fuel costs. Our ability to pass on any significant increases in aircraft fuel costs through fare increases could also be limited. In the event of a reduction in fuel prices compared to our hedged position, if any, our hedged positions could counteract the cost benefit of lower fuel prices and may require us to post cash margin collateral. In a falling fuel price environment, we may be required to make cash payments to our counterparties which may impair our liquidity position and increase our costs.
Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Trends and Uncertainties Affecting Our Business—Aircraft Fuel.”
Restrictions on, or increased taxes applicable to, charges for ancillary products and services paid by airline passengers and burdensome consumer protection regulations or laws could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The DOT has rules governing many facets of the airline-consumer relationship, including, for instance, price advertising, tarmac delays, bumping of passengers from flights, ticket refunds and the carriage of disabled passengers. If we are not able to remain in compliance with these rules, the DOT may subject us to fines or other enforcement action, including requirements to modify our passenger reservations system, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The U.S. Congress and federal administrative agencies have investigated the increasingly common airline industry practice of unbundling the pricing of certain products and services. If new taxes are imposed on ancillary products or if other laws or regulations are adopted that make ancillary products more cumbersome or expensive, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed. Congressional and other government scrutiny may also change industry practice or public willingness to pay for ancillary services. See also “Risks Related to Our Business—We are subject to extensive and increasing regulation by the FAA, DOT, TSA and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies, compliance with which could cause us to incur increased costs and adversely affect our business and financial results.”
We have not paid certain federal excise taxes on optional passenger seat selection charges (the “Excise Tax”). Following an audit by the IRS related to the collection of the Excise Tax on optional passenger seat selection charges covering the second quarter of 2018 through the fourth quarter of 2020, on March 31, 2022, we were assessed $34.9 million. On July 19, 2022, the assessment was reduced to $27.5 million. We believe we have defenses available and intend to challenge the assessment; therefore, we have not recognized a loss contingency.
The airline industry is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. Adverse economic conditions would negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business and the airline industry in general are affected by many changing economic conditions beyond our control, including, among others:
•changes and volatility in general economic conditions, including the severity and duration of any downturn in the U.S. or global economy and financial markets and the rate of inflation;
•changes in consumer preferences, perceptions, spending patterns or demographic trends, including any increased preference for higher-fare carriers offering higher amenity levels, and reduced preferences for low-fare carriers offering more basic transportation;
•higher levels of unemployment and varying levels of disposable or discretionary income in part due to the effect of high inflation rates and interest rates in the United States;
•depressed housing and stock market prices; and
•lower levels of actual or perceived consumer confidence.
These factors can adversely affect, and from time to time have adversely affected, our results of operations, our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and our liquidity. Unfavorable general economic conditions, such as higher unemployment rates, a constrained credit market, housing-related pressures and increased focus on reducing business operating costs, can reduce spending for price-sensitive leisure and business travel. For many travelers, in particular the price-sensitive travelers we serve, air transportation is a discretionary purchase that they may reduce or eliminate from their spending in difficult economic times. The overall decrease in demand for air transportation in the United States in 2008 and 2009 resulting from record high fuel prices and the economic recession required us to take significant steps to reduce our capacity, which reduced our revenues. Additionally, in 2020 and 2021, we were required to reduce our capacity as a result of a dramatic drop in demand due to, and restrictions imposed as a result of, the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfavorable economic conditions could also affect our ability to raise prices to counteract the effect of increased fuel, labor or other costs, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The airline industry faces ongoing security concerns and related cost burdens, furthered by threatened or actual terrorist attacks or other hostilities, that could significantly harm our industry and our business.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath negatively affected the airline industry. The primary effects experienced by the airline industry included:
•substantial loss of revenue and flight disruption costs caused by the grounding of all commercial air traffic in or headed to the United States by the FAA for days after the terrorist attacks;
•increased security and insurance costs;
•increased concerns about future terrorist attacks;
•airport shutdowns and flight cancellations and delays due to security breaches and perceived safety threats; and
•significantly reduced passenger traffic and yields due to the subsequent dramatic drop in demand for air travel.
Since September 11, 2001, the Department of Homeland Security and the TSA have implemented numerous security measures that restrict airline operations and increase costs, and are likely to implement additional measures in the future. For example, following the widely publicized attempt of an alleged terrorist to detonate plastic explosives hidden underneath his clothes on a Northwest Airlines flight on Christmas Day in 2009, passengers became subject to enhanced random screening, which included pat-downs, explosive detection testing and body scans. Enhanced passenger screening, increased regulation governing carry-on baggage and other similar restrictions on passenger travel may further increase passenger inconvenience and reduce the demand for air travel. In addition, increased or enhanced security measures have tended to result in higher governmental fees imposed on airlines, resulting in higher operating costs for airlines, which we may not be able to pass on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Any future terrorist attacks or attempted attacks, even if not made directly on the airline industry, or the fear of such attacks or other hostilities (including elevated national threat warnings or selective cancellation or redirection of flights due to terror threats) would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and on the airline industry in general.
Airlines are often affected by factors beyond their control, any of which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Like other airlines, our business is affected by factors beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports, air traffic control inefficiencies, major construction or improvements at airports at which we operate, adverse weather conditions, increased security measures, software or technology problems, new travel-related taxes, the outbreak of disease, new regulations or policies from the presidential administration and Congress, and supply chain disruptions, in particular those causing inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, aircraft or spare parts such as engines. Factors that cause flight delays frustrate passengers and increase costs, which in turn could adversely affect profitability. The federal government currently
controls all U.S. airspace, and airlines are completely dependent on the FAA to operate that airspace in a safe, efficient and affordable manner. The air traffic control system, which is operated by the FAA, faces challenges in managing the growing demand for U.S. air travel. U.S. and foreign air-traffic controllers often rely on outdated technologies that routinely overwhelm the system and compel airlines to fly inefficient, indirect routes resulting in delays. A significant portion of our operations is concentrated in markets such as South Florida, the Caribbean, Latin America and the Northeast and northern Midwest regions of the United States, which are particularly vulnerable to weather, airport traffic constraints and other delays. Adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes affecting southern Florida and the Caribbean (such as Hurricanes Irma and Maria in September 2017, Hurricane Dorian in August 2019, Hurricane Laura in August 2020, Hurricane Ian in September 2022, Hurricane Idalia in August 2023, Hurricane Helene in September 2024 and Hurricane Milton in October 2024) as well as southern Texas (such as Hurricane Harvey in August 2017 and Hurricane Beryl in July 2024), winter snowstorms or earthquakes (such as the September 2017 earthquakes in Mexico City, Mexico and the December 2019 and January 2020 earthquakes in Puerto Rico) can cause flight cancellations, significant delays and facility disruptions. For example, during 2017, the timing and location of Hurricanes Irma and Maria produced a domino effect on our operations, resulting in approximately 1,400 flight cancellations and numerous flight delays, which resulted in an adverse effect on our results of operations. Cancellations or delays due to adverse weather conditions or natural disasters, air traffic control problems or inefficiencies, breaches in security, software or technology problems, staffing shortages, or other factors may affect us to a greater degree than other, larger airlines that may be able to recover more quickly from these events, and therefore could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition to a greater degree than other air carriers. For example, during 2022, a number of adverse weather events, as well as increases in air traffic control programs and restrictions, led to a significant number of flight delays and cancellations. Similarly, the CrowdStrike IT outage in July 2024 caused a significant number of flight cancellations before the software issue was remedied. Because of our high utilization, point-to-point network, operational disruptions can have a disproportionate impact on our ability to recover. In addition, many airlines reaccommodate their disrupted passengers on other airlines at prearranged rates under flight interruption manifest agreements. We have been unsuccessful in procuring any of these agreements with our peers, which makes our recovery from disruption more challenging than for larger airlines that have these agreements in place. Similarly, outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as Ebola, measles, avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1 (swine) flu, Zika virus and COVID-19, could result in significant decreases in passenger traffic, the imposition of government restrictions in service, supply chain bottlenecks or issues, and staffing shortages and could have a material adverse impact on the airline industry. For example, in 2020 and 2021, the U.S. government and government authorities in other countries around the world implemented travel bans, testing requirements and other restrictions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and recommended against air travel, which drastically reduced consumer demand for air travel. Any resurgence of COVID-19 or another pandemic or public health crisis that results in similar or other restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Air travel is continuing its resurgence following widespread adoption of vaccines, but the situation is fluid and actual capacity adjustments could be different than what we currently expect. Any increases in travel-related taxes could also result in decreases in passenger traffic. Any general reduction in airline passenger traffic could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, U.S. federal government shutdowns may cause delays and cancellations or reductions in discretionary travel due to longer security lines, including as a result of furloughed government employees, or reductions in staffing levels, including air traffic controllers. U.S. government shutdowns may also impact our ability to take delivery of aircraft and commence operations in new domestic stations. Any extended shutdown like the one in January 2019 may have a negative impact on our operations and financial results. In addition, supply chain issues have led to delays in aircraft deliveries and negatively impacted our ability to source spare parts and complete maintenance on a timely basis, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Restrictions on or litigation regarding third-party membership discount programs could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We generate a relatively small but growing portion of our revenue from commissions, revenue share and other fees paid to us by third-party merchants for customer click-throughs, distribution of third-party promotional materials and referrals arising from products and services of the third-party merchants that we offer to our customers on our website. Some of these third-party referral-based offers are for memberships in discount programs or similar promotions made to customers who have purchased products from us, and for which we receive a payment from the third-party merchants for every customer that accepts the promotion. Certain of these third-party membership discount programs have been the subject of consumer complaints, litigation and regulatory actions alleging that the enrollment and billing practices involved in the programs violate various consumer protection laws or are otherwise deceptive. Any private or governmental claim or action that may be brought against us in the future relating to these third-party membership programs could result in our being obligated to pay damages or incurring legal fees in defending claims. These damages and fees could be disproportionate to the revenues we generate through these relationships. In addition, customer dissatisfaction or a significant reduction in or termination of the third-party membership discount offers on our website as a result of these claims could have a negative impact on our brand, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We face competition from air travel substitutes.
In addition to airline competition from traditional network airlines, other low-cost airlines and regional airlines, we also face competition from air travel substitutes. On our domestic routes, we face competition from some other transportation alternatives, such as bus, train or automobile. In addition, technology advancements may limit the demand for air travel. For example, video teleconferencing and other methods of electronic communication may reduce the need for in-person communication and add a new dimension of competition to the industry as travelers seek lower-cost substitutes for air travel. If we are unable to adjust rapidly in the event the basis of competition in our markets changes, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have changed our business strategy, and there can be no assurance that our current business strategy will be successful.
Our business strategy has changed substantially since embarking upon our comprehensive transformation plan, which is designed to realign our business model to evolved customer needs, such as premium leisure, while maintaining low costs. For additional information refer to “Business – Our Business Model.” Although we believe that our strategy will improve our business and mitigate risks, because of the risks described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, potentially greater than anticipated costs to support our business model or other unforeseen issues or problems that might arise, there can be no assurance that our transformation plan will succeed as intended or that we will be able to execute on our strategy effectively.
Increased labor costs, union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruption may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial conditions.
Our business is labor intensive, with labor costs representing approximately 28.1%, 27.6% and 22.1% of our total operating costs for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 84% of our workforce was represented by labor unions. We cannot assure that our labor costs going forward will remain competitive, because in the future our labor agreements may be amended or become amendable and new agreements could have terms with higher labor costs; one or more of our competitors may significantly reduce their labor costs, thereby reducing or eliminating our comparative advantages as to one or more of such competitors; or our labor costs may increase in connection with our network strategy. As further described below, our aircraft maintenance technicians (“AMTs”) voted to be represented by the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (the “AMFA”). In November 2022, AMFA notified us of its intent to negotiate a CBA and we began negotiations. In October 2023, AMFA filed for mediation with the National Mediation Board (“NMB”). In May 2024, the parties began negotiations with a NMB mediation, and those discussions are ongoing. Any such negotiation may cause us to incur higher labor costs for our AMTs over the term of the agreement than we would have incurred absent such agreement. We may also become subject to additional collective bargaining agreements in the future given the possibility that other non-unionized workers may unionize.
Relations between air carriers and labor unions in the United States are governed by the RLA. Under the RLA, collective bargaining agreements generally contain “amendable dates” rather than expiration dates, subject to standard opener provisions, and the RLA requires that a carrier maintain the existing terms and conditions of employment following the amendable date through a multi-stage and usually lengthy series of bargaining processes overseen by the NMB. This process continues until either the parties have reached agreement on a new collective bargaining agreement or the parties have been released to “self-help” by the NMB. In most circumstances, the RLA prohibits strikes; however, after release by the NMB, carriers and unions are free to engage in self-help measures such as lockouts and strikes.
During 2017, we experienced operational disruption from pilot-related work action which adversely impacted our results. We obtained a temporary restraining order to enjoin further illegal labor action. In January 2018, under the guidance of the NMB-assigned mediators, the parties reached a tentative agreement. In February 2018, the pilot group voted to approve the five-year agreement with us. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we reached an agreement with ALPA for a new two-year agreement, which was ratified by ALPA members on January 10, 2023. The ratified agreement includes increased pay rates and other enhanced benefits. In March 2024, ALPA provided notice to us that it intends to amend its CBA with its pilots. In July 2024, the parties began negotiations, and those discussions are ongoing.
In March 2016, under the supervision of the NMB, we reached a tentative agreement for a five-year contract with our flight attendants. Our flight attendants ratified the agreement in May 2016. In February 2021, we entered into a Letter of Agreement with the AFA-CWA to change the amendable date of the collective bargaining agreement from May 4, 2021 to September 1, 2021. All other terms of the collective bargaining agreement remained the same. In June 2021, the AFA-CWA
notified us, as required by the RLA, that it intended to submit proposed changes to the collective bargaining agreement covering our flight attendants. We commenced negotiations with the AFA-CWA on September 27, 2021. In February 2023, we reached an agreement with our flight attendants which was ratified by the flight attendants on April 13, 2023 and becomes amendable in January 2026. The ratified agreement includes increased pay rates and other enhanced benefits.
Our dispatchers are represented by the PAFCA. In October 2018, we reached a tentative agreement with PAFCA for a new five-year agreement, which was ratified by the PAFCA members in October 2018. In May 2023, PAFCA provided notice that it intends to amend its CBA with our dispatchers. The parties began negotiating changes to the CBA on July 12, 2023. In February 2024, PAFCA filed for mediation with the NMB. In April 2024, the parties began negotiations with a mediator. In July 2024, the Company reached an agreement with PAFCA for a new two-year agreement, which was ratified by PAFCA members on August 10, 2024. The ratified agreement includes increased pay rates.
Our ramp service agents are represented by IAMAW. Representation only applies to our Fort Lauderdale station where we have direct employees in the ramp service agent classification. In February 2020, the IAMAW notified us, as required by the RLA, that it intended to submit proposed changes to the collective bargaining agreement covering our ramp service agents which became amendable in June 2020. On September 28, 2021, we filed an “Application for Mediation Services” with the NMB. We were able to reach a tentative agreement with the IAMAW with the assistance of the NMB on October 16, 2021. Our ramp service agents ratified the five-year agreement in November 2021.
In June 2018, our passenger service agents voted to be represented by the TWU, but the representation only applies to our Fort Lauderdale station where we have direct employees in the passenger service classification. We began meeting with the TWU in late October 2018 to negotiate an initial collective bargaining agreement. During February 2022, we reached a tentative agreement with the TWU. Our passenger service agents ratified the five-year agreement on February 21, 2022.
In August 2022, our AMTs voted to be represented by AMFA as their collective bargaining agent. In November 2022, AMFA notified us of its intent to negotiate a CBA and began negotiations. In October 2023, AMFA filed for mediation with the National Mediation Board (“NMB”). In May 2024, the parties began negotiations with a NMB mediation, and those discussions are ongoing.
If we are unable to reach an agreement with any of our unionized work groups in current or future negotiations regarding the terms of their CBAs, we may be subject to work interruptions or stoppages, such as the strike by our pilots in June 2010 and the operational disruption from pilot-related work action experienced in 2017. A strike or other significant labor dispute with our unionized employees is likely to adversely affect our ability to conduct business. Any agreement we do reach could increase our labor and related expenses.
A deterioration in worldwide economic conditions may adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition, liquidity and ability to obtain financing or access capital markets.
The general worldwide economy has in the past experienced downturns due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the European debt crisis, unfavorable U.S. economic conditions and slowing growth in certain Asian economies, including general credit market crises, collateral effects on the finance and banking industries, energy price volatility, concerns about inflation, higher interest rates, slower economic activity, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions, geopolitical conflict, pandemic risks, government constraints on international trade and liquidity concerns. We cannot accurately predict the nature, extent, duration, effect or likelihood of any economic slowdown or the timing, strength or sustainability of a subsequent economic recovery worldwide or in the United States or the impact of the foregoing on the aviation industry.
Negative conditions in the general economy both in the United States and globally, including conditions resulting from changes in gross domestic product growth, declines in consumer confidence, labor shortages, inflationary pressures, high interest rates, and financial and credit market fluctuations could result in decreases in spending on air travel and otherwise, increases in labor costs and delayed deliveries of aircraft, all of which could materially and adversely affect the implementation of our business network strategy. In particular, although inflation in the United States had been relatively low for several decades, beginning in 2021, the U.S. economy experienced a significant inflationary effect from, among other things, supply chain disruptions and governmental stimulus or fiscal policies adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. While we cannot predict any future trends in the rate of inflation, there is currently significant uncertainty in the near-term economic outlook. Continued inflation would further raise our costs for labor, materials and services, which could negatively impact our profitability and cash flows. Additionally, we may be unable to raise our fares in amounts equal to the rate of inflation.
In addition, we have significant obligations for aircraft and spare engines that we have ordered from Airbus, IAE and Pratt & Whitney over the next several years, and we will need to finance these purchases. We may not have sufficient liquidity
or creditworthiness to fund the purchase of aircraft and engines, including payment of PDPs, or for other working capital. Factors that affect our ability to raise financing or access the capital markets include market conditions in the airline industry, economic conditions, the perceived residual value of aircraft and related assets, the level and volatility of our earnings, our relative competitive position in the markets in which we operate, our ability to retain key personnel, our operating cash flows and legal and regulatory developments. In addition, our current Chapter 11 Cases may limit our access to adequate capital. Regardless of our creditworthiness, at times the market for aircraft purchase or lease financing has been very constrained due to such factors as the general state of the capital markets and the financial position of the major providers of commercial aircraft financing.
We rely on maintaining a high daily aircraft utilization rate to implement our low-cost structure, which makes us especially vulnerable to flight delays or cancellations or aircraft unavailability.
We maintain a high daily aircraft utilization rate. During 2024, we operated our aircraft at a slightly lower daily average utilization level of 9.9 hours, compared to 11.1 hours for 2023 and 10.7 hours for 2022. This decrease was primarily due to the removal of aircraft from service prompted by a rare issue with the powdered metal used in certain engine parts which accelerated inspections of the PW 1100G-JM GTF engines that power our A320neo fleet. Aircraft utilization is the average amount of time per day that our aircraft spend carrying passengers. Our revenue per aircraft can be increased by high daily aircraft utilization, which is achieved in part by reducing turnaround times at airports so we can fly more hours on average in a day. Aircraft utilization is reduced by delays and cancellations from various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports or other air traffic control problems, adverse weather conditions, increased security measures or breaches in security, international or domestic conflicts, terrorist activity, outbreaks of pandemics or contagious diseases or other changes in business conditions. A significant portion of our operations are concentrated in markets such as South Florida, the Caribbean, Latin America and the Northeast and northern Midwest regions of the United States, which are particularly vulnerable to weather, airport traffic constraints and other delays. In addition, pulling aircraft out of service for unscheduled and scheduled maintenance, the occurrence of which will increase as our fleet ages, may materially reduce our average fleet utilization and require that we seek short-term substitute capacity at increased costs. Similarly, removing aircraft from service to inspect and repair the PW1100G engines could reduce our average fleet utilization. Due to the relatively small size of our fleet and high daily aircraft utilization rate, the unavailability of aircraft and resulting reduced capacity could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our maintenance costs will increase as our fleet ages, and we will periodically incur substantial maintenance costs due to the maintenance schedules of our aircraft fleet.
As of December 31, 2024, the average age of our aircraft was approximately 5.8 years. Our relatively new aircraft require less maintenance now than they will in the future. Our fleet will require more maintenance as it ages and our maintenance and repair expenses for each of our aircraft will be incurred at approximately the same intervals. For our leased aircraft, we expect that the final heavy maintenance events will be amortized over the remaining lease term rather than until the next estimated heavy maintenance event, because we account for heavy maintenance under the deferral method. This will result in significantly higher depreciation and amortization expense related to heavy maintenance in the last few years of the leases as compared to the costs in earlier periods. Moreover, because our current fleet was acquired over a relatively short period, significant maintenance that is scheduled on each of these planes is occurring at roughly the same time, meaning we will incur our most expensive scheduled maintenance obligations, known as heavy maintenance, across our present fleet around the same time. These more significant maintenance activities result in out-of-service periods during which our aircraft are dedicated to maintenance activities and unavailable to fly revenue service. In addition, the terms of some of our lease agreements require us to pay maintenance reserves to the lessor in advance of the performance of major maintenance, resulting in our recording significant prepaid deposits on our consolidated balance sheet. Depending on their recoverability, these maintenance reserves may be expensed as supplemental rent. We expect scheduled and unscheduled aircraft maintenance expenses to increase over the next several years. Any significant increase in maintenance and repair expenses would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our lack of marketing alliances could harm our business.
Many airlines, including the domestic traditional network airlines (American, Delta and United) have marketing alliances with other airlines, under which they market and advertise their status as marketing alliance partners. These alliances, such as OneWorld, SkyTeam and Star Alliance, generally provide for code-sharing, loyalty program reciprocity, coordinated scheduling of flights to permit convenient connections and other joint marketing activities. Such arrangements permit an airline to market flights operated by other alliance members as its own. This increases the destinations, connections and frequencies offered by the airline and provides an opportunity to increase traffic on that airline’s segment of flights connecting with alliance partners. We currently do not have any alliances with U.S. or foreign airlines. Our lack of marketing alliances puts us at a competitive disadvantage to traditional network carriers who are able to attract passengers through more widespread alliances,
particularly on international routes, and that disadvantage may result in a material adverse effect on our passenger traffic, business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to extensive and increasing regulation by the FAA, DOT, TSA and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies, compliance with which could cause us to incur increased costs and adversely affect our business and financial results.
Airlines are subject to extensive and increasing regulatory and legal compliance requirements, both domestically and internationally, that involve significant costs. In the last several years, Congress has passed laws, and the DOT, FAA and TSA have issued regulations, relating to the operation of airlines that have required significant expenditures. We expect to continue to incur expenses in connection with complying with government regulations. Additional laws, regulations, taxes and increased airport rates and charges have been proposed from time to time that could significantly increase the cost of airline operations or reduce the demand for air travel. If adopted, these measures could have the effect of raising ticket prices, reducing revenue and increasing costs.
The DOT has been aggressive in enforcing regulations for violations of the tarmac delay rules, passenger with disability rules, advertising rules and other consumer protection rules that could increase the cost of airline operations or reduce revenues. In December 2020, the DOT issued a Final Rule on Traveling by Air with Service Animals. This rule limits service animals to a dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability, and no longer considers an emotional support animal to be a service animal. This eliminates the requirement to carry emotional support animals for free and will likely reduce costs. Additionally, in December 2020, the DOT withdrew a Request for Information soliciting information on whether airline restrictions on the distribution or display of airline flight information constitute an unfair and deceptive business practice and/or an unfair method of competition. The DOT said that decisions on how and where to sell their services should be left to the airlines.
In its first day in office, the Biden Administration issued an executive order that froze review and approval of any new rulemaking. This freeze led the DOT to withdraw the Final Rule on Tarmac Delay and the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on Airfare Advertising. The ANPRM may not be reissued.
In May 2024, Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, which extends FAA funds through fiscal year 2028. The legislation contains provisions which could have effects on our results of operations and financial condition. Among other provisions, the new law requires the DOT to lift the payment cap on denied boarding compensation, create new requirements for the treatment of disabled passengers, and treble the maximum civil penalty for damage to wheelchairs and other assistive devices or for injuring a disabled passenger. Under the Act, the FAA is required to issue rules establishing minimum dimensions for passenger seats, including seat pitch, width and length. The Act also establishes new rest requirements for flight attendants and requires, within one year, that the FAA issue an order mandating installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on each new aircraft.
In December 2023, Congress passed the Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2023, Part II, which extends FAA funds through March 8, 2024, while Congress works to pass a long-term extension. A five-year extension of FAA funds has passed the House of Representatives, but remains stalled in the Senate. In the event that authorization of FAA funds lapses, our operations and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In January 2021, the DOT issued a final rule, effective April 2021, to clarify that the maximum amount of Denied Boarding Compensation (DBC) that a carrier may provide to a passenger denied boarding involuntarily is not limited. We cannot forecast how eliminating this maximum amount of payment will affect our costs.
In July 2023, the DOT issued a final rule, effective October 2, 2023, requiring airlines to ensure that at least one lavatory on new single-aisle aircraft with at least 125 passenger seats is large enough to permit a passenger with a disability (with the help of an assistant, if necessary) to approach, enter and maneuver within the lavatory, as necessary, to use all lavatory facilities and to leave by means of the aircraft’s on-board wheel chair. The final rule applies to new aircraft ordered 10 years or delivered 12 years after the effective date of the final rule, or on new type-certificated aircraft designs filed 1 year after the effective date of the final rule. We cannot forecast the effect these accessibility requirements will have on our costs and operations.
In 2021 and 2022, the DOT issued several NPRMs relating to air travel and airline ticketing and fees. In July 2021, the DOT issued a NPRM requiring airlines to refund checked bag fees for delayed bags if they are not delivered to the passenger within a specified number of hours and refunding ancillary fees for services related to air travel that passengers did not receive. In November 2021, the DOT reopened the comment period on a NPRM regarding short-term improvements to lavatory
accessibility, including new proposed requirements for OBWs (Part 1). This NPRM was to gather information about all aspects of OBW design, including stowage, before issuing any final binding regulation on the topic. In March 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM (Part 2) requiring airlines to ensure that at least one lavatory on new single-aisle aircraft with at least 125 passenger seats is large enough to permit a passenger with a disability (with the help of an assistant, if necessary) to approach, enter and maneuver within the lavatory, as necessary, to use all lavatory facilities and to leave by means of the aircraft’s on-board wheel chair. If enacted as currently proposed, this NPRM (Part 2) would apply to new aircraft ordered 18 years or delivered 20 years after the effective date of a final rule. In August 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM requiring airlines and ticket agents to provide non-expiring travel vouchers or credits to consumers holding non-refundable tickets for scheduled flights to, from or within the United States as a result of the carrier cancelling or making a significant change to a scheduled flight, a serious communicable disease or for several other reasons. The NPRM will further define the terms “significant change” and “cancellation” and will require airlines and ticket agents to provide refunds if they receive significant financial assistance from the government as a result of a public health emergency. As of December 31, 2024, a final rule has not been issued; however, it is our understanding that the DOT will combine this NPRM with the July 2021 NPRM, regarding the refunding of certain checked bag fees ancillary fees. If any of these NPRMs are enacted as proposed, they may increase our costs and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We cannot forecast the effect these refund requirements will have on our costs and operations.
In October 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM which would require airlines to increase disclosure of bag fees, change and cancellation fees, and family seating policies during the ticket purchase process in an effort to improve the transparency of airline pricing. The comment period closed on January 23, 2023. The DOT published its Enhancing Transparency of Airline Ancillary Services Fee final rule on April 30, 2024. A federal court of appeals has stayed the rule pending its review of legal challenges to the rule’s lawfulness. On January 28, 2025, the court of appeals ruled that the DOT failed to fully comply with requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act and remanded the rule to the DOT. Among other requirements, the final rule would require air carriers and ticket agents to clearly disclose on their websites, whenever fare and schedule information is provided for flights to, within and from the United States, passenger-specific or itinerary- specific prices for certain ancillary services if those services are not included in the advertised fare price. We cannot forecast the effect of this final rule, if it goes into effect, on our costs and operations.
On August 9, 2024, the DOT proposed a rule which would require airlines to seat children aged 13 and under adjacent to at least one accompanying adult at no additional cost beyond the fare, subject to limited exceptions. Under the proposed rule, an airline’s failure to provide family seating would subject it to civil penalties on a per passenger (child) basis, and if the carrier charged families a fee beyond the fare to secure family seating, the carrier would be subject to civil penalties for each fee imposed. The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on November 7, 2024, and no further action has been taken by DOT. We cannot forecast the effect of this final rule on our costs and operations.
On December 17, 2024, the DOT issued a final rule to increase access to safe and dignified air travel for individuals with disabilities, particularly individuals who use a wheelchair or scooter. The rule imposes requirements on airlines pertaining to how they assist passengers with disabilities and how airlines handle wheelchairs and other assistive devices. The final rule became effective on January 16, 2025. Under the final rule, airlines are also required to provide information to passengers with wheelchairs or scooters prior to departure, upon arrival, and if their wheelchair or scooter is mishandled. In the case of an airline delaying the return of, mishandling, or causing damage to a passenger’s wheelchair or scooter, the final rule requires airlines to reimburse passengers for certain costs and expenses. Pursuant to a Notification of Enforcement Discretion issued effective February 20, 2025, the DOT announced it would not take any enforcement action under this rule until March 20, 2025. We cannot forecast the effect of this final rule on our costs and operations.
We cannot assure that these and other laws or regulations enacted in the future will not harm our business. In addition, the TSA mandates the federalization of certain airport security procedures and imposes additional security requirements on airports and airlines, most of which are funded by a per ticket tax on passengers and a tax on airlines. We cannot forecast what additional security and safety requirements may be imposed in the future or the costs or revenue impact that would be associated with complying with such requirements.
Our ability to operate as an airline is dependent on our maintaining certifications issued to us by the DOT and the FAA. The FAA has the authority to issue mandatory orders relating to, among other things, the grounding of aircraft, inspection of aircraft, installation of new safety-related items and removal and replacement of aircraft parts that have failed or may fail in the future. A decision by the FAA to ground, or require time consuming inspections of or maintenance on, our aircraft, for any reason, could negatively affect our business and financial results. Federal law requires that air carriers operating large aircraft be continuously “fit, willing and able” to provide the services for which they are licensed. Our “fitness” is monitored by the DOT, which considers factors such as unfair or deceptive competition, advertising, baggage liability and disabled passenger transportation. While the DOT has seldom revoked a carrier's certification for lack of fitness, such an occurrence would render
it impossible for us to continue operating as an airline. The DOT may also institute investigations or administrative proceedings against airlines for violations of regulations.
The U.S. government is under persistent pressure to implement cost cutting and efficiency initiatives. In addition, the U.S. government has recently and may in the future experience delays in the completion of its budget process which could delay funding for government departments and agencies that regulate or otherwise are tied to the aviation industry, including the DOT and FAA. To the extent that any such initiatives or budgeting delays affect the operations of these government departments and agencies, including by forcing mandatory furloughs of government employees, our operations and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
International routes are regulated by treaties and related agreements between the United States and foreign governments. Our ability to operate international routes is subject to change because the applicable arrangements between the United States and foreign governments may be amended from time to time. Our access to new international markets may be limited by our ability to obtain the necessary certificates to fly the international routes. In addition, our operations in foreign countries are subject to regulation by foreign governments and our business may be affected by changes in law and future actions taken by such governments, including granting or withdrawal of government approvals and restrictions on competitive practices. We are subject to numerous foreign regulations based on the large number of countries outside the United States where we currently provide service. If we are not able to comply with this complex regulatory regime, our business could be significantly harmed. Please see “Business — Government Regulation.”
Government-imposed travel requirements and entry bans from certain countries based on emerging viruses or variants of existing viruses could be imposed in the future. We will continue to comply with all contagious disease requirements issued by the U.S. and foreign governments, but we cannot forecast what additional requirements may be imposed in the future or the extent of any pre-travel testing requirements that may be under consideration in the United States and that may be in place, or renewed, in any foreign jurisdiction we serve, including the effect of such requirements on passenger demand or the costs or revenue impact that would be associated with complying with such requirements.
Changes in legislation, regulation and government policy have affected, and may in the future have a material adverse effect on, our business.
Changes in, and uncertainty with respect to, legislation, regulation and government policy at the local, state or federal level have affected, and may in the future significantly impact, our business and the airline industry. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, limits deductions for borrowers for net interest expense on debt. Specific legislative and regulatory proposals that could have a material impact on us in the future include, but are not limited to, infrastructure renewal programs; changes to immigration policy; modifications to international trade policy, including withdrawing from trade agreements and imposing tariffs; changes to financial legislation, including the partial or full repeal of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) or the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; public company reporting requirements; environmental regulation and antitrust enforcement. Additionally, certain
Executive Orders could affect our business, operations, strategies and increase our costs of compliance. Any such changes may make it more difficult and/or more expensive for us to obtain new aircraft or engines and parts to maintain existing aircraft or engines or make it less profitable or prevent us from flying to or from some of the destinations we currently serve.
To the extent that any such changes have a negative impact on us or the airline industry, including as a result of related uncertainty, these changes may materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Any tariffs imposed on commercial aircraft and related parts imported from outside the United States may have a material adverse effect on our fleet, business, financial condition and our results of operations.
Certain of the products and services that we purchase, including our aircraft and related parts, are sourced from suppliers located in foreign countries, and the imposition of new tariffs, or any increase in existing tariffs, by the U.S. government on the importation of such products or services could materially increase the amounts we pay for them. In early October 2019, the World Trade Organization ruled that the United States could impose $7.5 billion in retaliatory tariffs in response to illegal European Union subsidies to Airbus. On October 18, 2019, the United States imposed these tariffs on certain imports from the European Union, including a 10% tariff on new commercial aircraft. In February 2020, the United States announced an increase to this tariff from 10% to 15%. These tariffs apply to aircraft that we are already contractually obligated to purchase. In June 2021, the United States Trade Representative announced that the United States and European Union had agreed to suspend reciprocal tariffs on large civilian aircraft for five years, pending discussions to resolve their trade dispute.
However, these tariffs are under continuing review and at any time could be increased, decreased, eliminated or applied to a broader range of products we use. The imposition of these tariffs may substantially increase the cost of, among other things, imported new Airbus aircraft and parts required to service our Airbus fleet, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations. We may also seek to postpone or cancel delivery of certain aircraft currently scheduled for delivery, and we may choose not to purchase as many aircraft as we intended in the future. Any such action could have a material adverse effect on the size of our fleet, business, financial condition and/or results of operations.
We also face uncertainty regarding increased tariffs under the second Trump Administration, which could result in retaliatory tariffs imposed on U.S. businesses from countries affected by such tariffs. For example, effective February 4, 2025,
the Trump Administration imposed 10% tariffs on all China exports from China, and, effective February 10, 2025, China
retaliated with 10-15% tariffs on certain U.S. exports including energy and agricultural machinery. While we cannot predict what actions may ultimately be taken with respect to tariffs or trade relations between the United States and such countries, the tariffs described above, the adoption and expansion of trade restrictions, the occurrence of a trade war, or other governmental action related to tariffs, trade agreements or related policies have the potential to adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We may not be able to implement our network strategy.
Effectively implementing our network strategy is critical for our business to sustain or increase our profitability. We face numerous challenges in implementing our network strategy, including our ability to:
•maintain profitability;
•acquire financing for new or used aircraft;
•access airports located in our targeted geographic markets where we can operate routes in a manner that is consistent with our cost strategy;
•obtain sufficient spare parts or related support services from our suppliers on a timely basis;
•gain access to international routes;
•access sufficient gates and other services at airports we currently serve or may seek to serve; and
•maintain efficient utilization and capacity of our existing aircraft.
Our ability to enter new markets is dependent upon our ability to maintain a safe and secure operation and requires additional personnel, equipment and facilities. An inability to hire and retain personnel, timely secure the required equipment and facilities in a cost-effective manner, efficiently operate our expanded facilities or obtain the necessary regulatory approvals may adversely affect our ability to achieve our network strategy, which could harm our business. In addition, expansion to new markets may have other risks due to factors specific to those markets. We may be unable to foresee all of the existing risks upon entering certain new markets or respond adequately to these risks, and our network strategy and our business may suffer as a result. In addition, our competitors may reduce their fares and/or offer special promotions to deter our entry into a new market or to stop our growth into existing markets or new markets. We cannot assure you that we will be able to profitably serve our existing markets or establish new markets.
Some of the markets we may target to enter in the Caribbean and Latin America include countries with less developed economies that may be vulnerable to unstable economic and political conditions, such as significant fluctuations in gross domestic product, interest and currency exchange rates, high inflation, civil disturbances, government instability, nationalization and expropriation of private assets and the imposition of taxes or other charges by governments. The occurrence of any of these events in markets served by us and the resulting instability may adversely affect our ability to implement our network strategy.
In 2008, in response to record high fuel prices and rapidly deteriorating economic conditions, we modified our growth plans by terminating our leases for seven aircraft. We incurred significant expenses relating to our lease terminations, and have incurred additional expenses to acquire new aircraft in place of those under the terminated leases as we expanded our network. In November 2023, we announced that we will discontinue service at Denver International Airport, effective January 9, 2024, as a result of underperforming routes and Pratt & Whitney’s GTF engine availability issues. See “—We depend on a limited
number of suppliers for our aircraft and engines.” In October 2024, we entered into an aircraft sale and purchase agreement with GAT for the sale of certain of our A320ceo and A321ceo aircraft. We may in the future determine to reduce further our future growth plans from previously announced levels, which may impact our business strategy and future profitability.
We rely heavily on technology and automated systems to operate our business and any failure of these technologies or systems or failure by their operators could harm our business.
We are highly dependent on technology and automated systems to operate our business and achieve low operating costs. These technologies and systems include our computerized airline reservation system, flight operations system, financial planning, management and accounting system, telecommunications systems, website, maintenance systems and check-in kiosks. The performance and reliability of our technology are critical to our ability to operate and compete effectively. The execution of our strategic plans could be negatively affected by (i) our ability to timely and effectively implement, transition, and maintain related information technology systems, networks and infrastructure; (ii) our ability to effectively balance our investment of incremental operating expenses and capital expenditures related to our strategies against the need to effectively control cost; and (iii) our dependence on third parties with respect to our ability to implement our strategic plans. We cannot assure you that our security measures, change control procedures and disaster recovery plans will be adequate to prevent disruptions or delays. Disruption in or changes to these systems and networks could result in an interruption to our operations or loss of important data. Any of the foregoing could result in a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.
In order for our operations to work efficiently, our website and reservation system must be able to accommodate a high volume of traffic, maintain secure information and deliver flight information with a high degree of reliability. Substantially all of our tickets are issued to passengers as electronic tickets. We depend on our reservation system, which is hosted and maintained under a long-term contract by a third-party service provider, to be able to issue, track and accept these electronic tickets. If our third-party service provider experiences operational failures or claims that it cannot perform as a result of a force majeure, due to the effects of COVID-19 or otherwise, we may not be able to operate our reservation system. If our reservation system fails or experiences interruptions, and we are unable to book seats for any period of time, we could lose a significant amount of revenue as customers book seats on competing airlines. We have experienced short duration reservation system outages from time to time and may experience similar outages in the future. For example, in November 2010, we experienced a significant service outage with our third-party reservation service provider on the day before Thanksgiving, one of the industry’s busiest travel days and in August 2013, we experienced a 13-hour outage that affected our sales and customer service response times. We also rely on third-party service providers of our other automated systems for technical support, system maintenance and software upgrades. If our automated systems are not functioning or if the current providers were to fail to adequately provide technical support or timely software upgrades for any one of our key existing systems, we could experience service disruptions, which could harm our business and result in the loss of important data, increase our expenses and decrease our revenues. For example, the CrowdStrike IT outage in July 2024, resulting from a faulty software update affecting Windows systems, caused a significant number of flight cancellations. In the event that one or more of our primary technology or systems’ vendors goes into bankruptcy, ceases operations or fails to perform as promised, replacement services may not be readily available on a timely basis, at competitive rates or at all and any transition time to a new system may be significant.
Artificial intelligence, including machine learning and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze or generate data or other materials (collectively, “AI”), and its current and potential future applications, as well as the legal and regulatory frameworks applicable to AI, continue to rapidly evolve. The use of AI could exacerbate existing risks or create new and unpredictable risks to our business, which could include significantly disrupting the markets in which we operate or subjecting us to increased competition and regulation. Any such risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We currently use AI functions to improve certain of our services and technical support capabilities, among others. Our use of AI may not yield the anticipated benefits, insights and efficiencies, and AI systems that we use could produce inaccurate, incomplete or ineffective results, which could result in operational and reputational harm. While we aim to develop and use AI responsibly and attempt to identify and mitigate technological, ethical and legal issues presented by its use, we may be unsuccessful in identifying or resolving such issues before they arise. Any failure to address concerns relating to the responsible use of AI technology may cause harm to our reputation or result in financial liability. Any such risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our AI systems cannot be completely protected against events that are beyond our control, including those caused by natural disasters, cyber-attacks, disruption of electrical grid or telecommunications failures, network failures or software bugs or errors. In particular, software bugs or errors may occur gradually and once in the code may be very hard to detect and can potentially affect results over a long period of time. Substantial or sustained system failures could cause service delays or failures and result in our customers purchasing tickets from other airlines. We have implemented security measures and change control procedures and have disaster recovery plans; however, we cannot assure you that these measures are
adequate to prevent disruptions. Disruption in, changes to or a breach of, these systems could result in a disruption to our business and the loss of important data. Moreover, in the event of system outages or interruptions, we may not be able to recover from our information technology and software providers all or any portion of the costs or business losses we may incur. Any of the foregoing could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to cyber security risks and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks.
Our business employs systems and websites that allow for the secure storage, transmission and other processing of proprietary or confidential information regarding our customers, employees, suppliers and others, including personal identification information, credit card data and other confidential information. Security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation and potential liability. Although we take steps to secure our management information systems and networks, and although auditors review and approve the security configurations and management processes of these systems and networks, including our computer systems, intranet and internet sites, email and other telecommunications and data networks, the security measures we have implemented may not be effective, and our systems and networks may be vulnerable to theft, loss, damage and interruption from a number of potential sources and events, including unauthorized access or security breaches, natural or man-made disasters, cyber-attacks (including ransom attacks in which malicious persons encrypt our systems, steal data, or both, and demand payment for decryption of systems or to avoid public release of data), computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering attacks, phishing attacks, power loss or other disruptive events. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks. Attacks may be targeted at us, our customers and suppliers, or others who have entrusted us with information. In addition, attacks not targeted at us, but targeted solely at suppliers, may cause disruption to our computer systems or a breach of the data that we maintain on customers, employees, suppliers and others.
Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us (and at times have caused us) to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees and engage third-party experts and consultants, or costs incurred in connection with the notifications to employees, suppliers or the general public as part of our notification obligations to the various governments that govern our business. Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries, or other developments may result in the breach or compromise of technology used by us to protect transaction or other data. In addition, data and security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including breaches by us or by persons with whom we have commercial relationships that result in the unauthorized release of personal or confidential information. Cyber security risks also may derive from fraud or malice on the part of our employees or third parties, or may result from human error, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failure or other technological failure. Such threats may be difficult to detect for long periods of time and also may be further enhanced in frequency or effectiveness through threat actors’ use of artificial intelligence.
Our reputation, brand and financial condition could be adversely affected if, as a result of a significant cyber event or other security issues: our operations are disrupted or shut down; our confidential, proprietary information is stolen or disclosed; we incur costs or are required to pay fines, sanctions or other penalties in connection with stolen customer, employee or other confidential information, (including personal data) or related regulatory enforcement or investigations; we must dedicate significant resources to system repairs or compliance measures or increase cyber security protection; or we otherwise incur significant litigation or other costs.
Our storage, use, disclosure and other processing of personal data could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation.
In the processing of our customer transactions, we receive, transmit, store and otherwise process a large volume of identifiable personal data, including financial data such as credit card information. This data is increasingly subject to complex and evolving legislation, regulation and standards, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (collectively, the “CCPA”), the Fair Accurate Credit Transparency Act, the rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the Federal Trade Commission and Payment Card Industry legislation, typically intended to protect the privacy and security of personal data that is collected, transmitted and otherwise processed. Numerous other U.S. states also have enacted, or are in the process of enacting or considering, comprehensive state-level data privacy and security laws and regulations that share similarities with the CCPA. Moreover, laws in all 50 U.S. states require businesses to provide notice under certain circumstances to consumers whose personal data has been disclosed as a result of a data breach. In addition, we may be subject to contractual obligations relating to the privacy and security of personal data that we collect, transmit and otherwise process. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to comply with existing privacy obligations or legislation or regulations are expanded to require changes in our business practices.
More generally, we rely on consumer confidence in the security of our system, including our website on which we sell the majority of our tickets. While we strive to publish and prominently display privacy policies that are accurate, comprehensive and compliant with applicable laws, regulations, rules and industry standards, we cannot ensure that our privacy policies and other statements regarding our practices will be sufficient to protect us from claims, proceedings, liability or adverse publicity relating to data privacy and security. Although we endeavor to comply with our privacy policies, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged to have failed to do so. The publication of our privacy policies and other documentation that provide promises and assurances about data privacy and security can subject us to potential government or legal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Any concerns about our data privacy and security practices, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business.
Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our privacy policies, or applicable data privacy and security laws, regulations, rules, standards or contractual obligations, or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access to, or unauthorized loss, destruction, use, modification, acquisition, disclosure, release or transfer of personal data, may result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices, the expenditure of substantial costs, time and other resources, proceedings or actions against us, legal liability, governmental investigations, enforcement actions, claims, fines, judgments, awards, penalties, sanctions and costly litigation (including class actions). Any of the foregoing could harm our reputation, distract our management and technical personnel, increase our costs of doing business, adversely affect the demand for our products and services, and ultimately result in the imposition of liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to maintain or grow our passenger revenues.
Our business strategy focuses on enhancing the Guest experience by introducing new benefits, including a range of travel options designed to meet the needs of all travelers, from premium to economical choices: Go Big, Go Comfy, Go Savvy, and Go. However, there can be no assurance that these offerings will be successful in driving higher passenger revenues. Factors such as changing customer preferences, economic conditions, increased competition or challenges in effectively executing our strategies could impact our ability to attract and retain passengers, potentially limiting our revenue growth. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in travel demand could further affect our ability to sustain or increase passenger revenues.
Our inability to expand or operate reliably or efficiently out of our key airports where we maintain a large presence could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are highly dependent on markets served from airports where we maintain a large presence. Our results of operations may be affected by actions taken by governmental or other agencies or authorities having jurisdiction over our operations at airports, including, but not limited to:
•increases in airport rates and charges;
•limitations on take-off and landing slots, airport gate capacity or other use of airport facilities;
•termination of our airport use agreements, some of which can be terminated by airport authorities with little notice to us;
•increases in airport capacity that could facilitate increased competition;
•international travel regulations such as customs and immigration;
•increases in taxes;
•changes in the law that affect the services that can be offered by airlines in particular markets and at particular airports;
•restrictions on competitive practices;
•the adoption of statutes or regulations that impact customer service standards, including security standards; and
•the adoption of more restrictive locally-imposed noise regulations or curfews.
In general, any changes or disruptions in airport operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on third-party service providers to perform functions integral to our operations.
We have entered into agreements with third-party service providers to furnish certain facilities and services required for our operations, including ground handling, catering, passenger handling, engineering, maintenance, refueling, reservations, technology upgrades, credit card processing and airports as well as other administrative and support services. We are likely to enter into similar service agreements as current service agreements expire and/or in new markets we decide to enter, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary services at acceptable terms and rates.
Prior to the expiration of agreements with third parties that provide us with our ground handling, catering, passenger handling, engineering, maintenance, refueling, reservations, technology upgrades, credit card processing, airports, and other service providers, we seek to negotiate the terms and conditions of new service agreements (with current or other eligible service providers) to avoid disruption or lapses in continued services provided to our operations. However, we cannot ensure that we will be able to obtain necessary services at acceptable terms and rates following the expiration of current agreements. For example, the term of our current credit card processing agreement expires on December 31, 2025 and our primary credit card processor is under no obligation to renew the agreement. There may not be alternative arrangements available to us from other credit card processors on comparable or better terms. Any lapses in continued services related to our operation or the failure to obtain the necessary services may have an adverse impact on our business and operations. In addition, although we seek to monitor the performance of third-party service providers, the efficiency, timeliness and quality of contract performance by third-party service providers are often beyond our control, and any failure by our service providers to perform their contracts, including as a result of operational failures or a force majeure, may have an adverse impact on our business and operations. For example, in 2008, our call center provider went bankrupt. Though we were able to quickly switch to an alternative vendor, we experienced a significant business disruption during the transition period and a similar disruption could occur in the future if we changed call center providers or if an existing provider ceased to be able to serve us. We expect to be dependent on such third-party arrangements for the foreseeable future.
We rely on third-party distribution channels to distribute a portion of our airline tickets.
We rely on third-party distribution channels, including those provided by or through global distribution systems, or GDSs, conventional travel agents and online travel agents, or OTAs, to distribute a portion of our airline tickets, and we expect in the future to rely on these channels to an increasing extent to collect ancillary revenues. Certain of these distribution channels also effectively restrict the manner in which we distribute our products generally. To remain competitive, we will need to successfully manage our distribution costs and rights, and improve the functionality of third-party distribution channels, while maintaining an industry-competitive cost structure. Negotiations with key GDSs and OTAs designed to manage our costs, increase our distribution flexibility, and improve functionality could be contentious, could result in diminished or less favorable distribution of our tickets, and may not provide the functionality we require to maximize ancillary revenues. Any inability to manage our third-party distribution costs, rights and functionality at a competitive level or any material diminishment in the distribution of our tickets could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position and our results of operations. Moreover, our ability to compete in the markets we serve may be threatened by changes in technology or other factors that may make our existing third-party sales channels impractical, uncompetitive or obsolete.
Our reputation and business could be materially adversely affected in the event of an emergency, accident or similar incident involving our aircraft.
We are exposed to potential significant losses in the event that any of our aircraft is subject to an emergency, accident, terrorist incident or other similar incident, and significant costs related to passenger claims, repairs or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its temporary or permanent loss from service. There can be no assurance that we will not be affected by such events
or that the amount of our insurance coverage will be adequate in the event such circumstances arise and any such event could cause a substantial increase in our insurance premiums. Please see “Risks Related to Our Business—Increases in insurance costs or significant reductions in coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.” In addition, any future aircraft emergency, accident or similar incident, even if fully covered by insurance or even if it does not involve our airline, may create a public perception that our airline or the equipment we fly is less safe or reliable than other transportation alternatives, or could cause us to perform time consuming and costly inspections on our aircraft or engines which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for our aircraft and engines.
One of the elements of our business strategy is to save costs by operating a single-family aircraft fleet - currently Airbus A320-family, single-aisle aircraft, powered by engines manufactured by IAE and Pratt & Whitney. If any of Airbus, IAE or Pratt & Whitney become unable to perform its contractual obligations, or if we are unable to acquire or lease aircraft or engines from these or other owners, operators or lessors on acceptable terms, we would have to find other suppliers for a similar type of aircraft or engine. In late 2022, we were notified by Airbus that a number of the aircraft we originally had scheduled for delivery in 2023 will be delayed into 2024 and beyond. These delays previously required us to reduce capacity expectations. If we have to lease or purchase aircraft from another supplier, we would lose the significant benefits we derive from our current single fleet composition. We may also incur substantial transition costs, including costs associated with retraining our employees, replacing our manuals and adapting our facilities and maintenance programs. Our operations could also be harmed by the failure or inability of aircraft, engine and parts suppliers to provide sufficient spare parts or related support services on a timely basis, particularly in connection with new-generation introductory technology. Our business would be significantly harmed if a design defect or mechanical problem with any of the types of aircraft, engines or components currently on order or that we operate were discovered that would halt or delay our aircraft delivery stream or that would ground any of our aircraft while the defect or problem was corrected, assuming it could be corrected at all. Starting in 2016, since the addition of A320neo aircraft, we had experienced introductory issues with the new-generation PW1100G engines, designed and manufactured by Pratt & Whitney, which had previously resulted in diminished service availability of such aircraft. Beginning in the second half of 2020, the A320neo aircraft fleet reliability had stabilized and the PW1100G engine technical issues had improved. However, beginning in the second half of 2022, we began experiencing reliability issues with the PW1100G engines once again resulting in diminished service availability of aircraft. Supply chain delivery issues and limited capacity at engine maintenance, repair, and overhaul (“MRO”) shops available to service PW1100G engines have resulted in extended turnaround time to perform these inspections and the modifications required to improve the reliability of these engines. These impacts are expected to continue, until supply chain and engine MRO shop capacity returns to required levels to support our network strategy. In addition, in July 2023, Pratt & Whitney announced that it had determined that a rare condition in the powdered metal used to manufacture certain engine parts will require accelerated inspection of the GTF fleet, which powers the A320neo aircraft. Pratt & Whitney notified us that all GTF engines in its fleet, including the engines slotted for future aircraft deliveries, for a yet to be determined period, may be subject to the removal and inspection, or replacement, of the powdered metal high-pressure turbine and compressor discs. We currently estimate these engines will require removal and inspection through at least 2026. Lower capacity resulting from manufacturer or supplier issues may lead to a significant impact on our business and operating results. For instance, partially as a result of the Pratt & Whitney engine issues, we have reduced, suspended or discontinued service in a number of cities. On March 26, 2024, we entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with IAE, an affiliate of Pratt & Whitney, pursuant to which IAE provided us with a monthly credit, subject to certain conditions, as compensation for each of our aircraft unavailable for operational service due to GTF engine issues from October 1, 2023 through the end of 2024. Pratt & Whitney agreed to issue us $150.6 million in credits related to the AOG days through December 31, 2024.
We cannot be certain that new technical issues may be mitigated given the relatively short life these engines have been in service. We continuously work with the engine manufacturer to secure support and relief in connection with possible engine related operation disruptions. Should appropriate design or mechanical modifications not be implemented or not be effective, this could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. These types of events, if appropriate design or mechanical modifications cannot be implemented, and related operations disruptions, including from required inspections, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, the use of our aircraft could be suspended or restricted by regulatory authorities in the event of actual or perceived mechanical or design problems. Our business would also be significantly harmed if the public began to avoid flying with us due to an adverse perception of the types of aircraft, engines or components that we operate stemming from safety concerns or other problems, whether real or perceived, or in the event of an accident involving those types of aircraft, engines or components. Carriers that operate a more diversified fleet are better positioned than we are to manage such events.
Reduction in demand for air transportation, or governmental reduction or limitation of operating capacity, in the domestic U.S., Caribbean or Latin American markets could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A significant portion of our operations are conducted to and from the domestic U.S., Caribbean or Latin American markets. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed if we lost our authority to fly to these markets, by any circumstances causing a reduction in demand for air transportation, or by governmental reduction or limitation of operating capacity, in these markets, such as adverse changes in local economic or political conditions, negative public perception of these destinations, unfavorable weather conditions, public health concerns or terrorist-related activities. Furthermore, our business could be harmed if jurisdictions that currently limit competition allow additional airlines to compete on routes we serve. Many of the countries we serve are experiencing either economic slowdowns or recessions, which may translate into a weakening of demand and could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Increases in insurance costs or significant reductions in coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We carry insurance for third-party liability, passenger liability, property damage and all-risk coverage for damage to our aircraft. As a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, aviation insurers significantly reduced the amount of insurance coverage available to commercial air carriers for liability to persons other than employees or passengers for claims resulting from acts of terrorism, civil unrest, war or similar events (war risk insurance). Accordingly, our insurance costs increased significantly and our ability to continue to obtain certain types of insurance remains uncertain. While the price of commercial insurance has declined since the period immediately after the terrorist attacks, in the event commercial insurance carriers further reduce the amount of insurance coverage available to us, or significantly increase its cost, we would be adversely affected. We currently maintain commercial airline insurance with several underwriters. However, there can be no assurance that the amount of such coverage will not be changed, or that we will not bear substantial losses from accidents. We could incur substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of related insurance coverage that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Renewing coverage may result in higher premiums and more restrictive terms. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to obtain adequate insurance.
Failure to comply with applicable environmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to increasingly stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of the environment, including those relating to emissions to the air, discharges to surface and subsurface waters, safe drinking water and the management of hazardous substances, oils and waste materials. Compliance with all environmental laws and regulations can require significant expenditures and any future regulatory developments in the United States and abroad could adversely affect operations and increase operating costs in the airline industry. For example, climate change legislation was previously introduced in Congress and such legislation could be re-introduced in the future by Congress and state legislatures, and could contain provisions affecting the aviation industry, compliance with which could result in the creation of substantial additional costs to us. Similarly, the EPA issued a rule that regulates larger emitters of greenhouse gases. Future operations and financial results may vary as a result of such regulations. Compliance with these regulations and new or existing regulations that may be applicable to us in the future could increase our cost base and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
There is also an increasing international focus on climate change, carbon emissions and environmental regulation. The principal deputy assistant secretary for aviation and international affairs at the DOT spent the last 25 years working on international aviation climate change policy at Environmental Defense Fund. This may signal increased emphasis on new environmental regulation on commercial aviation.
Members of the International Civil Aviation Organization (“ICAO”) have been negotiating a global agreement in greenhouse gas emissions for the aviation industry. In October 2016, the ICAO adopted the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (“CORSIA”), which is a global, market-based emissions offset program designed to encourage carbon-neutral growth beyond 2020. Further, in June 2018 the ICAO adopted standards pertaining to the collection and sharing of information in international aviation emissions beginning in 2019. We are a participant in the CORSIA program. The CORSIA will increase operating costs for Spirit and other U.S. airlines that operate internationally. The CORSIA is being implemented in phases beginning with two initial, voluntary phases from 2021 to 2023 and 2024 to 2026, with the mandatory phase beginning in 2027. The COVID-19 pandemic has depressed international aviation such that 2020 emissions will not be included in setting a baseline. Only flights between participating countries are subject to offsetting requirements until participation becomes mandatory for all countries starting in 2027. Certain details are still being developed and the impact cannot be fully predicted. Compliance with CORSIA could significantly increase our operating costs. The potential impact of CORSIA or other emissions-related requirements on our costs will ultimately depend on a number of factors, including baseline emissions, the price of emission allowances or offsets that we would need to acquire, the efficiency of our fleet and the number of flights subject to these requirements. These costs have not been completely defined and could fluctuate.
Governmental authorities in several U.S. and foreign cities are also considering or have already implemented aircraft noise reduction programs, including the imposition of nighttime curfews and limitations on daytime take-offs and landings. We have been able to accommodate local noise restrictions imposed to date, but our operations could be adversely affected if locally-imposed regulations become more restrictive or widespread.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel or fail to maintain our company culture, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.
Our business is labor intensive. We require large numbers of pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians and other personnel. The airline industry has from time to time experienced a shortage of qualified personnel, particularly with respect to pilots and maintenance technicians. In addition, we currently face, and may continue to face, high employee turnover, including with respect to our pilots. We may be required to increase wages and/or benefits in order to attract and retain qualified personnel. If we are unable to hire, train and retain qualified employees, our operations and business could be harmed and we may be unable to implement our network strategy.
In addition, we believe it may be increasingly challenging to continue to hire people who will maintain our company culture. Our company culture, which we believe is one of our competitive strengths, is important to providing high-quality customer service and having a productive, accountable workforce that helps keep our costs low. As we continue to grow, we may be unable to identify, hire or retain enough people who meet the above criteria, including those in management or other key positions. If we fail to maintain the strength of our company culture, our competitive ability and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed. For example, the pendency of the Chapter 11 restructuring may make it difficult to retain and hire qualified personnel. Please see “We are subject to other risks and uncertainties associated with our
Chapter 11 Cases.”
Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if we lose the services of our key personnel.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts and abilities of our senior management team and key financial and operating personnel. In particular, we depend on the services of our senior management team. Competition for highly qualified personnel is intense. The loss of any executive officer or other key employee without adequate replacement or the inability to attract new qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We do not maintain key-person life insurance on our management team.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified Board members.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements. We also have incurred and will continue to incur costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, the Dodd-Frank Act and related rules implemented or to be implemented by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. The expenses incurred by public companies generally for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board, our Board committees, or as our executive officers and may divert management’s attention. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our common stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.
Our results of operations fluctuate due to seasonality, weather, and other factors.
We expect our quarterly operating results to fluctuate due to seasonality and generally expect demand to be greater in the second and third quarters compared to the rest of the year. Actions of our competitors and travel restrictions may also contribute to fluctuations in our results. We are more susceptible to adverse weather conditions, than some of our competitors, since a significant portion of our operations are concentrated in markets such as South Florida, the Caribbean, Latin America and the Northeast and northern Midwest regions of the United States, which are particularly vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, airport traffic constraints and other delays. As we enter new markets, we could be subject to additional seasonal variations along with any competitive responses to our entry by other airlines. Price changes in aircraft fuel as well as the timing and amount of maintenance and advertising expenditures may also impact our operations. As a result of these factors, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indicator of our future performance. In addition, it is possible in any
future period that our operating results could be below the expectations of investors and any published reports or analysis regarding Spirit. In such an event, the price of our common stock could decline, perhaps substantially.
We may utilize artificial intelligence, which could expose us to liability or adversely affect our business.
We may, and may in the future, use artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, machine learning and similar tools and technologies (collectively, “AI”) in connection with our business. However, there are significant risks involved in utilizing AI and no assurance can be provided that our use will enhance our products or services or produce the intended results. For example, AI algorithms may be flawed, insufficient, of poor quality, reflect unwanted forms of bias, or contain other errors or inadequacies, any of which may not be easily detectable; AI has been known to produce false or “hallucinatory” inferences or outputs; AI can present ethical issues and may subject us to new or heightened legal, regulatory, ethical, or other challenges; and inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers and end-users, or other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI, could impair the acceptance of AI solutions, including those incorporated in our products and services. If the AI solutions that we create or use are deficient, inaccurate or controversial, we could incur operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, legal liability, brand or reputational harm, or other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. If we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which our AI solutions or other AI tools we use rely, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy or other rights, or contracts to which we are a party.
In addition, the regulatory framework for AI is rapidly evolving worldwide as legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. It is possible that new laws and regulations will be adopted in the United States and in non-U.S. jurisdictions, or that existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in ways that would affect the operation of our products and services and the way in which we use AI and similar technologies. We may not be able to adequately anticipate or respond to these evolving laws and regulations, and we may need to expend additional resources to adjust our offerings in certain jurisdictions if applicable legal frameworks are inconsistent across jurisdictions. Moreover, because these technologies are themselves highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all of the legal or regulatory risks that may arise relating to our use of such technologies. Further, the cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Programs
The success of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program depend on the success of the Company.
The Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program depend on our continued success as a commercial airline and our continued performance under certain Free Spirit Agreements. The success or failure of our business will have a direct impact the success and the value of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program.
Business decisions made by the Company, including with respect to ticket prices, routes, the location of hubs, cabin designs, safety procedures, any initiatives to retain customers and otherwise, could have an adverse impact on our appeal to air travelers, which could negatively affect participation in the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program, damage our reputation or harm our relationships with the Free Spirit Partners. For instance, certain business decisions may negatively adjust the rate at which points are purchased by third parties under the terms of the applicable Free Spirit Agreement, and decisions by the Company with respect to mergers, divestitures or other corporate events may provide for termination rights of third parties under Free Spirit Agreements, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the financial and operational success, as well as the appraised value of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program.
The success of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program may be harmed by decisions or actions of our partners that are beyond our control.
The Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program depend in part on the decisions or actions of our partners. For example, issuers of our co-branded credit cards have certain rights to alter terms and conditions of the credit card accounts of their customers, including finance charges and other fees and required minimum monthly payments, in order to maintain their competitive position in the credit card industry or to comply with, among other things, regulatory guidelines, relevant law or prudent business practices. Changes in the terms of such credit card accounts may reduce the number of new accounts, the volume of credit card spend or negatively impact account retention, which in turn may reduce the number of points accrued and sold or impact the Free Spirit Program. Although issuers of our co-branded credit cards may consult the Company prior to
implementing any such changes, no assurance can be given that issuers of our co-branded credit cards will not take actions that adversely affect the success of Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program.
Covenant restrictions on the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program in our debt agreements will impose restrictions on our operations, and if we are not able to comply with such covenants, our creditors could accelerate our indebtedness or exercise other remedies.
The covenants in the indenture governing the Secured Notes contains a number of provisions that impose restrictions on the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company to, among other things, amend the policies and procedures of the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program in a manner that would be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect, compete with the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® by establishing another mileage or loyalty program (subject to certain exceptions) and sell pre-paid miles in excess of $25.0 million annually and $125.0 million in the aggregate. The indenture contains additional restrictions on the Free Spirit Program and the Spirit Saver$ Club® program, including the ability to terminate or modify certain licenses and certain material Free Spirit Agreements. The indenture also requires Spirit to maintain a minimum liquidity of at least $400.0 million on a daily basis. Such covenants are in addition to the other restrictions in the indenture, such as restrictions on the ability of the issuers and guarantors of the Secured Notes to make restricted payments, incur additional indebtedness, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, create or incur certain liens on the collateral, merge, consolidate, or sell assets, sell, transfer or otherwise convey the collateral and designate certain subsidiaries as unrestricted.
Complying with these covenants and other restrictive covenants that may be contained in any future debt agreements will limit our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of business opportunities that are in our long-term interest.
The failure to comply with any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under the indenture governing the Secured Notes or any future debt agreement, which could lead to an acceleration of the debt under such instruments and, in some cases, the acceleration of debt under other instruments that contain cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In the case of an event of default, or in the event of a cross-default or cross-acceleration, we may not have sufficient funds available to make the required payments under our debt agreements.
Risks Related to Our Leverage and Liquidity
We have a significant amount of aircraft-related fixed obligations and we have incurred, and may incur in the future, significant additional debt, that could impair our liquidity and thereby harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to pay the fixed and other costs associated with our contractual obligations will depend on our operating performance, cash flow and our ability to secure adequate financing, which will in turn depend on, among other things, the success of our current business strategy, fuel price volatility, weakening or improvement in the U.S. economy, as well as general economic and political conditions and other factors that are beyond our control. From time to time and subject to market conditions and any applicable contractual requirements, we may refinance portions of our debt, including our 2025 maturities, which, at current interest rates and market conditions, may negatively impact our interest expense or result in higher dilution. The amount of our aircraft-related fixed obligations, our obligations under our other debt arrangements, and the related need to obtain financing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could:
•require a substantial portion of cash flow from operations for operating lease and maintenance deposit payments, and principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
•limit our ability to make required pre-delivery deposit payments, or PDPs, including those payable to our aircraft and engine manufacturers for our aircraft and spare engines on order;
•limit our ability to obtain additional financing to support our expansion plans and for working capital and other purposes on acceptable terms or at all;
•make it more difficult for us to pay our other obligations as they become due during adverse general economic and market industry conditions because any related decrease in revenues could cause us to have insufficient cash flows from operations to make our scheduled payments;
•reduce our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the airline industry and, consequently, place us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors with fewer fixed payment obligations or which are subject to fewer limitations or restrictions; and
•cause us to lose access to one or more aircraft and forfeit our rent deposits if we are unable to make our required aircraft lease rental and debt payments and our lessors or lenders exercise their remedies under the lease and debt agreements, including cross default provisions in certain of our leases and mortgages.
A failure to pay our operating lease, debt and other fixed cost obligations or a breach of our contractual obligations could result in a variety of adverse consequences, including the exercise of remedies by our creditors and lessors. In such a situation, it is unlikely that we would be able to cure our breach, fulfill our obligations, make required lease or debt payments or otherwise cover our fixed costs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Downgrades in, and withdrawals of, our credit ratings could increase future debt financing costs and limit the future availability of debt financing.
Our credit ratings are important to our cost and availability of capital. The major rating agencies routinely evaluate our credit profile and assign credit ratings to us. This evaluation is based on a number of factors, which include financial strength, business and financial risk, transparency with rating agencies, and timeliness of financial reporting, as well as overall industry risk. We have experienced downgrades in, and withdrawals of, our credit ratings based on our increased level of credit risk as a result of the financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and a continued lack of profitability.
Beginning in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and leading up to the Chapter 11 Cases, our corporate credit ratings have been downgraded by Fitch, S&P Global and/or Moody's. As of February 2025, following our Chapter 11 filing, our Fitch and S&P Global's credit ratings were D, respectively. Additionally, following our Chapter 11 filing, Moody's downgraded our credit rating and eventually withdrew it entirely.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain these credit ratings. If our credit ratings were to be further downgraded, or general market conditions were to ascribe higher risk to our ratings levels, the airline industry, or to us, it could increase future debt financing costs and limit the future availability of debt financing, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If our credit ratings were to be further downgraded, or general market conditions were to ascribe higher risk to our ratings levels, the airline industry, or us, it could increase future debt financing costs and limit the future availability of debt financing, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Despite our current indebtedness levels, we may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could further increase the risks associated with our leverage.
We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness, including the Exit Secured Notes, the Exit Revolving Credit
Facility and additional secured indebtedness, in the future. Our debt agreements do not prohibit us from incurring additional unsecured indebtedness or certain secured indebtedness. If other such indebtedness is incurred in the future, our debt service obligations will increase. The more leveraged we become, the more we will be exposed to the risks created by our current substantial indebtedness.
Our ability to incur secured indebtedness is subject to compliance with certain covenants in the indenture governing the Secured Notes and, upon the Effective Date will be subject to compliance with certain covenants in the agreements governing the Exit Secured Notes and the Exit Revolving Credit Facility, which may be more restrictive than the covenants that govern the Secured Notes, and, in certain circumstances, the liens securing such additional indebtedness will be permitted to be pari passu with the liens securing the Secured Notes and the Exit Secured Notes.
To the extent that the terms of our current or future debt agreements would prevent us from incurring additional indebtedness, we may be able to obtain amendments to those agreements that would allow us to incur such additional indebtedness, and such additional indebtedness could be material.
For additional information, refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—13. Debt and Other Obligations” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—10. Equity.”
We are highly dependent upon our cash balances and operating cash flows.
As of December 31, 2024, we have a DIP Facility for $300.0 million. For additional information, refer to “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—13. Debt and Other Obligations.” This facility is not adequate to finance our operations, and we will continue to be dependent on our operating cash flows and cash balances to fund our operations and to make scheduled payments on our aircraft-related fixed obligations. In addition, we have sought, and may continue to seek, financing from other available sources to fund our operations. For example, on the Effective Date, we will issue $840.0 million of the Exit Secured Notes and enter into the Exit Revolving Credit Facility providing up to $300.0 million in financing. We can give no assurances that we will be able to secure additional sources of funds to support our operations, or, if such funds are available to us, that such additional financing will be sufficient to meet our needs. In addition, our credit card processors are entitled to withhold receipts from customer purchases from us, under certain circumstances. If we fail to maintain certain liquidity and other financial covenants, their rights to holdback would become operative, which would result in a reduction of unrestricted cash that could be material. If we fail to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet our operating cash requirements or do not obtain a line of credit, other borrowing facility or equity financing, we could default on our operating lease and fixed obligations. Our inability to meet our obligations as they become due would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Relating to Our Securities
Future sales and issuances of our common stock or rights to purchase common stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our stock price to decline.
We may issue additional securities, including shares of new common equity. Future sales and issuances of our common stock or rights to purchase our common stock could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. We may issue and sell new common equity in a manner as we may determine from time to time. If we sell any such new common equity in subsequent transactions, investors may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our new common equity.
On the Effective Date, all of our existing Common Stock and other equity interests will be canceled without any distributions to the holders of our Common Stock and other equity interests on account thereof. In addition, after the Effective Date, we have agreed to register the resale of a significant number of shares of our common stock held by certain of our stockholders. As a result, common stock held by these stockholders may become eligible for future sale without restriction. Accordingly, these stockholders then may freely resell their shares in the open market, which could cause our stock price to decline.
The issuance or sale of shares of our common stock, or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, or warrants issued to the Treasury under the PSP1, PSP2 or PSP3, could depress the trading price of our common stock on the OTC Pink Market and Convertible Notes.
We may conduct future offerings of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock to finance our operations or fund acquisitions, or for other purposes. In connection with our participation in PSP1, PSP2 and PSP3, we issued to the Treasury 739,089 warrants which may be exercised for shares of our common stock in consideration for the receipt of funding from the Treasury. The warrants expire in five years from the date of issuance, are transferable, have no voting rights and contain customary terms regarding anti-dilution. If the Treasury or any subsequent warrant holder exercises the warrants, the interest of our holders of common stock would be diluted and we would be partially owned by the U.S. government, which could have a negative impact on our common stock price, and which could require increased resources and attention by our management. Additionally, in 2020 we issued 9,000,000 shares pursuant to our ATM Program and in 2021 we completed the registered direct placement of 10,594,073 shares of our voting common stock. Further, we reserve shares of our common stock for future issuance under our equity incentive plans, which shares are eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various agreements and, to the extent held by affiliates, the volume and manner of sale restrictions of Rule 144. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, into the public market, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. The indenture for the 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2025 (the “2025 Convertible Notes”) and the 1.00% convertible senior notes due 2026 (the “2026 Convertible Notes”, and together with the 2025 Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”) does not restrict our ability to issue additional
equity securities in the future. If we issue additional shares of our common stock or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, if any of our existing stockholders sells a substantial amount of our common stock, or if the market perceives that such issuances or sales may occur, then the trading price of our common stock on the OTC Pink Market, and, accordingly, the Convertible Notes, may significantly decline. In addition, any issuance of additional shares of common stock will dilute the ownership interests of our existing common stockholders, including holders of our Convertible Notes who have received shares of our common stock upon conversion of their Convertible Notes.
Conversion of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, including holders of the Convertible Notes who have previously converted their Convertible Notes.
At our election, we may settle Convertible Notes tendered for conversion partly or, in the case of the 2025 Convertible Notes, entirely, in shares of our common stock. As a result, the conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon such conversion of the Convertible Notes could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock and, in turn, the price of the Convertible Notes. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the Convertible Notes could depress the price of our common stock.
Provisions in the indenture governing the Convertible Notes could delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial takeover of us.
Certain provisions in the Convertible Notes and the indenture governing the Convertible Notes could make a third party attempt to acquire us more difficult or expensive. For example, if a takeover constitutes a fundamental change, then holders of the Convertible Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash. In addition, if a takeover constitutes a make-whole fundamental change, then we may be required to temporarily increase the conversion rate. In either case, and in other cases, our obligations under the Convertible Notes and the indenture governing the Convertible Notes could increase the cost of acquiring us or otherwise discourage a third party from acquiring us or removing incumbent management, including in a transaction that holders of the Convertible Notes or holders of our common stock may view as favorable.
The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, volatile, which could cause the value of an investment in our stock to decline.
On November 18, 2024, we received the Delisting Notice from the NYSE notifying us that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Case and in accordance with NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 802.01D, the NYSE had determined that our shares of common stock would be delisted from the NYSE and that trading of our shares of common stock on NYSE was suspended immediately. As a result of the suspension and expected delisting, our shares of Common Stock commenced trading on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “SAVEQ” on November 19, 2024. All of our existing Common Stock and other equity interests will be canceled without any distributions to the holders of our Common Stock and other equity interests on account thereof.
The market price of our common stock on the OTC Pink Market may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
•developments in the Chapter 11 Cases and approval of the Plan;
•announcements, media reports, analyst reports or other publications regarding the Chapter 11 restructuring;
•announcements concerning our competitors, the airline industry or the economy in general;
•strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
•increased price competition;
•media reports and publications about the safety of our aircraft or the aircraft type we operate;
•new regulatory pronouncements and changes in regulatory guidelines;
•changes in the price of aircraft fuel;
•announcements concerning the availability of the type of aircraft we use;
•general and industry-specific economic conditions, including the level of inflation;
•changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts or failure to meet analysts’ performance expectations;
•sales of our common stock or other actions by investors with significant shareholdings;
•trading strategies related to changes in fuel or oil prices; and
•general market, political and economic conditions.
The stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These types of broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Any significant future declines in the price of our common stock could have an adverse impact on investor confidence and employee retention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In the past, stockholders have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Any similar litigation against us could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources and harm our business or results of operations.
We may be unable to purchase the Secured Notes or the Convertible Notes upon the occurrence of an applicable change of control or other event.
Upon the occurrence of a Parent Change of Control, as defined in the indenture governing the Secured Notes, the issuers of the Secured Notes would be required to offer to purchase such notes for cash at a price equal to 101% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the repurchase date. Additionally, holders of the Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase their notes following a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture governing the Convertible Notes, at a cash repurchase price generally equal to the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, upon conversion, we will satisfy part or all of our conversion obligation in cash unless we elect to settle conversions solely in shares of our common stock.
Applicable law, regulatory authorities and the agreements governing our other indebtedness may restrict our ability to repurchase the Secured Notes or Convertible Notes or pay the cash amounts due upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. Moreover, the exercise by holders of the Secured Notes or Convertible Notes of the right to require the issuers to repurchase their respective notes, or the failure to repurchase such notes, could cause a default under our other debt, even if the event itself does not result in a default under such debt, due to the financial effect of such repurchase. In addition, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to repurchase the Convertible Notes or the Secured Notes, or pay the cash amounts due upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. Therefore, we cannot assure you that sufficient funds will be available when necessary to make any required repurchases.
In addition, the indenture governing the Secured Notes sets forth certain Mandatory Prepayment Events, as defined in the indenture governing the Secured Notes. Upon the occurrence of any such Mandatory Prepayment Event, we would be required to prepay the Secured Notes pro rata to the extent of any net cash proceeds received in connection with such event, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed plus an applicable premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to, but excluding, the prepayment date. Our failure to complete any such mandatory prepayment would result in a default under the indenture governing the Secured Notes. Such a default may, in turn, constitute a default under any other of our debt agreements that may then be outstanding.
Finally, the indenture governing the Secured Notes sets forth certain Mandatory Repurchase Offer Events, as defined in the indenture governing the Secured Notes. Upon the occurrence of any such Mandatory Repurchase Offer Event, we would be required to offer to repurchase the Secured Notes pro rata to the extent of any net cash proceeds received in connection with such event, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the repurchase date. Our failure to discharge this obligation would result in a default under the indenture governing the Secured Notes. Such a default may, in turn, constitute a default under other of our debt agreements that may then be outstanding.
The indenture governing the Secured Notes imposes certain restrictions which may adversely affect our business and liquidity.
The indenture governing the Secured Notes imposes certain restrictions on the issuers of the Secured Notes and certain guarantors. These restrictions limit their ability to, among other things: (i) make restricted payments, (ii) incur additional indebtedness, (iii) create certain liens on the collateral, (iv) sell or otherwise dispose of the collateral and (v) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the issuers’ assets, among other restrictions. As a result of these restrictions, we may be limited in how we conduct our business, in our ability to compete effectively or in our ability to implement changes or take advantage of business opportunities—including by making strategic acquisitions, investments or alliances, restructuring our organization or financing capital needs—that would be in our interest. We may also be unable to raise additional indebtedness or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
Our current anti-takeover provisions may delay or prevent a change of control, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Our current amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make it difficult to remove our Board and management and may discourage or delay “change of control” transactions, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock. These provisions include, among others:
•our Board is divided into three classes, with each class serving for a staggered three-year term, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new Board at an annual meeting;
•actions to be taken by our stockholders may only be effected at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders and not by written consent;
•special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by the Chairman of the Board or by our corporate secretary at the direction of our Board; and
•advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our Board and propose matters to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company.
On the Effective Date, we expect to file a new certificate of incorporation and adopt amended and restated bylaws, the governance provisions of which may vary from our existing governance practices.
Our corporate charter and bylaws include provisions limiting voting by non-U.S. citizens and specifying an exclusive forum for stockholder disputes.
To comply with restrictions imposed by federal law on foreign ownership of U.S. airlines, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws restrict voting of shares of our common stock by non-U.S. citizens. The restrictions imposed by federal law currently require that no more than 25% of our stock be voted, directly or indirectly, by persons who are not U.S. citizens, and that our president and at least two-thirds of the members of our Board and senior management be U.S. citizens. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that the failure of non-U.S. citizens to register their shares on a separate stock record, which we refer to as the “foreign stock record,” would result in a suspension of their voting rights in the event that the aggregate foreign ownership of the outstanding common stock exceeds the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law.
Our amended and restated bylaws further provide that no shares of our common stock will be registered on the foreign stock record if the amount so registered would exceed the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law. If it is determined that the amount registered in the foreign stock record exceeds the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law, shares will be removed from the foreign stock record in reverse chronological order based on the date of registration therein, until the number of shares registered therein does not exceed the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law. As of December 31, 2024, we believe we were in compliance with the foreign ownership rules.
As of December 31, 2024, there are no shares of non-voting common stock outstanding. When shares of non-voting common stock are outstanding, the holders of such stock may convert such shares, on a share-for-share basis, in the order reflected on our foreign stock record as shares of common stock are sold or otherwise transferred by non-U.S. citizens to U.S. citizens.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also specifies that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders. Because the applicability of the exclusive forum provision is limited to the extent permitted by applicable law, we do not intend for the exclusive forum provision to apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction, and acknowledge that federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act. We note that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce the provision as it applies to the Securities Act and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. This provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.
We do not intend to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the further development and expansion of our business and fund share repurchases under programs approved by our Board. We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions contained in current or future financing instruments, business prospects and such other factors as our Board deems relevant. The timing of any share repurchases under share repurchase programs will depend upon market conditions, our capital allocation strategy and other factors.