UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
 
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file numbers: 001-35263 and 333-197780

VEREIT, Inc.
VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (VEREIT, Inc.)
 
45-2482685
Delaware (VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.)
 
45-1255683
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100, Phoenix, AZ
 
85016
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(800) 606-3610
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
Title of each class:
Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (VEREIT, Inc.)
New York Stock Exchange
6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (VEREIT, Inc.)
New York Stock Exchange
 
 
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
 
None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
VEREIT, Inc. Yes x No o VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
VEREIT, Inc. Yes o No x VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. VEREIT, Inc. Yes x No o VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). VEREIT, Inc. Yes x No o VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
VEREIT, Inc.
Large accelerated filer
x
 
Accelerated filer
o
 
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Smaller reporting company
o
 
Emerging growth company
o
 
 
VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Large accelerated filer
o
 
Accelerated filer
o
 
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
x
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Smaller reporting company
o
 
Emerging growth company
o
 
 



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. VEREIT, Inc. ¨ VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
VEREIT, Inc. Yes o No x VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of VEREIT, Inc. as of June 30, 2017 was approximately $7.9 billion based on the closing sale price for VEREIT, Inc.’s common stock on that day as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. Such value excludes common stock held by executive officers and directors.
There were 974,297,922 shares of common stock of VEREIT, Inc. outstanding as of February 20, 2018 .
There is no public trading market for the common units of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. As a result, the aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. cannot be determined.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of VEREIT, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than those portions of the Proxy Statement specifically incorporated by reference pursuant to Items 10 through 14 of Part III hereof, no other portions of the Proxy Statement shall be deemed so incorporated.





EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of VEREIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, of which VEREIT, Inc. is the sole general partner. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “VEREIT,” the “Company” or the “General Partner” mean VEREIT, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., and all references to the “Operating Partnership” or “OP” mean VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
As the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., VEREIT, Inc. has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management and control.
We believe combining the Annual Reports on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc. and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. into this single report results in the following benefits:
enhancing investors’ understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminating duplicative disclosure and providing a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and
creating time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
There are a few differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important to understand the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how we operate as an interrelated consolidated company. VEREIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust whose only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. As a result, VEREIT, Inc. does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing equity or debt from time to time and guaranteeing certain unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company and holds the ownership interests in the Company’s joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity or debt issuances by VEREIT, Inc., which are generally contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units. To help investors understand the significant differences between VEREIT, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, there are separate sections in this report that separately discuss VEREIT, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, including the consolidated financial statements and certain notes to the consolidated financial statements as well as separate disclosures in Item 4. Controls and Procedures and Exhibit 31 and Exhibit 32 certifications. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, VEREIT, Inc. consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of VEREIT, Inc. and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. are the same on their respective consolidated financial statements. The separate discussions of VEREIT, Inc. and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.



VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

 
Page

1

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the federal securities laws, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that reflect our expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. We have attempted to identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seek,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “targets,” “intends,” “should,” “estimates,” “could,” “continue,” “assume,” “projects,” “plans” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, those discussed below. We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable by law. We do not undertake publicly to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in underlying assumptions or new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required to satisfy our obligations under federal securities law.
The following are some, but not all, of the assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all.
We are subject to risks associated with tenant, geographic and industry concentrations with respect to our properties.
Our properties, goodwill and intangible assets and other assets may be subject to impairment charges.
We could be subject to unexpected costs or unexpected liabilities that may arise from potential dispositions.
We are subject to competition in the acquisition and disposition of properties and in the leasing of our properties and we may be unable to acquire, dispose of, or lease properties on advantageous terms.
We could be subject to risks associated with bankruptcies or insolvencies of tenants or from tenant defaults generally.
We are subject to risks associated with pending government investigations relating to the findings of the investigation conducted in 2014 by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the General Partner’s board of directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”) and related litigation, including the expense of such investigations and litigation and any potential payments upon resolution.
We have substantial indebtedness, which may affect our ability to pay dividends, and expose us to interest rate fluctuation risk and the risk of default under our debt obligations.
Our overall borrowing and operating flexibility may be adversely affected by the terms and restrictions within the indenture governing the Senior Notes (as defined in Note 10 – Debt ), and the terms of the Credit Facility (as defined in Note 10 – Debt ).
Our access to capital and terms of future financings may be affected by adverse changes to our credit rating.
We may be affected by the incurrence of additional secured or unsecured debt.
We may not be able to achieve and maintain profitability.
We may not generate cash flows sufficient to pay our dividends to stockholders or meet our debt service obligations.
We may be affected by risks resulting from losses in excess of insured limits.
We may fail to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Compliance with the REIT annual distribution requirements may limit our operating flexibility.
We may be unable to retain or hire key personnel.
All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 .
We use certain defined terms throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have the following meanings:
When we refer to “annualized rental income,” we mean the rental revenue under our leases on operating properties owned at the respective reporting date on a straight-line basis, which includes the effect of rent escalations and any tenant concessions, such as free rent, and excludes any bad debt allowances and any contingent rent, such as percentage rent. Management uses annualized rental income as a basis for tenant, industry and geographic concentrations and other metrics within the portfolio. Annualized rental income is not indicative of future performance.
When we refer to a “creditworthy tenant,” we mean a tenant that has entered into a lease that we determine is creditworthy and may include tenants with an investment grade or below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating

2

Table of Contents

agencies, or unrated tenants. To the extent we determine that a tenant is a “creditworthy tenant” even though it does not have an investment grade credit rating, we do so based on our management’s determination that a tenant should have the financial wherewithal to honor its obligations under its lease with us. As explained further below, this determination is based on our management’s substantial experience performing credit analysis and is made after evaluating all of a tenant’s due diligence materials that are made available to us, including financial statements and operating data.
When we refer to a “direct financing lease,” we mean a lease that requires specific treatment due to the significance of the lease payments from the inception of the lease compared to the fair value of the property, term of the lease, a transfer of ownership, or a bargain purchase option. These leases are recorded as a net asset on the balance sheet. The amount recorded is calculated as the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term.
When we refer to properties that are net leased on a “long term basis,” we mean properties with remaining primary lease terms of generally seven to 10 years or longer on average, depending on property type.
Under a “net lease,” the tenant occupying the leased property (usually as a single tenant) does so in much the same manner as if the tenant were the owner of the property. There are various forms of net leases, most typically classified as triple net or double net. Triple net leases typically require the tenant pay all expenses associated with the property ( e.g. , real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs). Double net leases typically require that the tenant pay all operating expenses associated with the property ( e.g. , real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance), but excludes some or all major repairs ( e.g. , roof, structure and parking lot). Accordingly, the owner receives the rent “net” of these expenses, rendering the cash flow associated with the lease predictable for the term of the lease. Under a net lease, the tenant generally agrees to lease the property for a significant term and agrees that it will either have no ability or only limited ability to terminate the lease or abate rent prior to the expiration of the term of the lease as a result of real estate driven events such as casualty, condemnation or failure by the landlord to fulfill its obligations under the lease.
When we refer to “operating properties” we mean properties owned by the Company and beginning in 2017 , omitting properties for which (i) the related mortgage loan is in default, and (ii) management decides to transfer the properties to the lender in connection with settling the mortgage note obligation. As of December 31, 2017 , our portfolio was comprised of 4,092 retail, restaurant, office and industrial real estate properties with an aggregate of 94.7 million square feet, of which 98.5% was leased, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years. As of December 31, 2017 , one vacant industrial property (the “Excluded Property”), comprised of 307,275 square feet, which secured a mortgage note payable with debt outstanding of $16.2 million , was not considered an operating property. Omitting the Excluded Property, we owned 4,091 operating properties with an aggregate of 94.4 million square feet, of which 98.8% was leased, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years as of December 31, 2017 .




3

Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1. Business.
Overview
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. The Company has 4,091 retail, restaurant, office and industrial operating properties with an aggregate of 94.4 million square feet, of which 98.8% was leased as of December 31, 2017 , with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties.
Substantially all of our real estate operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership. VEREIT, Inc. is the sole general partner and holder of 97.6% of the common partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (the “OP Units”) as of December 31, 2017 with the remaining 2.4% of the OP Units owned by certain non-affiliated investors and certain former directors, officers and employees of the Former Manager (defined below).
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented. The Company's continuing operations represent primarily those of the real estate investment segment. See Note 5 — Discontinued Operations , for further information on the sale of Cole Capital.
VEREIT, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Maryland on December 2, 2010 and has elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Operating Partnership was formed in the State of Delaware on January 13, 2011. We operate our business in a manner that permits us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). VEREIT, Inc.’s shares of common stock and 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the trading symbols “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively.
2017 Developments
Real Estate Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company acquired controlling financial interests in 88 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million .
Real Estate Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company disposed of 137 properties f or an aggregate sales price of $594.9 million , of which the Company’s share was $574.4 million after the profit participation payments related to the disposition of 31 Red Lobster properties and the consolidated joint venture partner’s share of the sales price, resulting in consolidated proceeds of $445.5 million after closing costs and a $66.0 million debt assumption.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
2017 Bond Offering
On August 11, 2017, the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 3.950% Senior Notes due 2027 , (the “2017 Bond Offering”). As discussed in Note 10 – Debt , the Company subsequently used the proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering to repay borrowings, including swap termination costs and accrued and unpaid interest under its $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan. The Company used the remaining proceeds to pay down secured debt.
Share Repurchase Program
On May 12, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock over the subsequent 12 months, as market conditions warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company repurchased 68,759 shares of Common Stock in multiple open market transactions for $0.5 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.

4

Table of Contents

Debt Reductions
The Company decreased total debt by $293.8 million , from $6.4 billion to $6.1 billion , partially due to the repayment of the Credit Facility Term Loan of $500.0 million and a $579.9 million reduction of secured debt. These reductions of debt were partially offset by the issuance of $600.0 million of unsecured notes and net borrowings on the revolving credit facility of $185.0 million .
Cole Capital Sale
On November 13, 2017, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement (as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale agreement, dated as of February 1, 2018, the “Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC. Under the terms of the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company agreed to sell to the Cole Purchaser all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. (“CCA”), our subsidiary that sponsors and manages non-listed real estate investment trusts, and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries. The sale closed (the “Cole Capital Closing Date”) on February 1, 2018 for total consideration of approximately $120 million paid in cash.

On the Cole Capital Closing Date, we entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with Cole Capital, pursuant to which we will continue to provide certain services to Cole Capital and its subsidiaries and to Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc. (“CCPT IV”), Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc. (“INAV”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”), and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V” and collectively with CCPT IV, INAV, CCIT II and CCIT III, the “Cole REITs”) including operational real estate support. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, we will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided and fees based on the future revenues of Cole Capital above a specified dollar threshold (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80 million in Net Revenue Payments.
Primary Investment Focus
We own and actively manage a diversified portfolio of single-tenant retail, restaurant, office and industrial real estate assets subject to long-term net leases with creditworthy tenants. Our focus is on single-tenant, net-leased properties that are strategically located and essential to the business operations of the tenant, as well as retail properties that offer necessity and value-oriented products or services. We actively manage the portfolio by considering several metrics including property type, tenant concentration, geography, credit and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity. We believe that actively managing our portfolio allows us to attain the best operating results for each asset and the overall portfolio through strategic planning, implementation of these plans and responding proactively to changes and challenges in the marketplace.
Investment Policies
When evaluating prospective investments in or dispositions of real property, our management considers relevant real estate and financial factors, including the location of the property, the leases and other agreements affecting the property and business operations of the tenant, the creditworthiness of major tenants, its income-producing capacity, its physical condition, its prospects for appreciation, its prospects for liquidity, tax considerations and other factors. In this regard, our management will have substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific investments, subject in certain instances to the approval of the Board of Directors.
As part of our overall portfolio strategy, we seek to lease space and/or acquire properties leased to creditworthy tenants that meet our underwriting and operating guidelines. Prior to entering into any transaction, our corporate credit analysis and underwriting professionals conduct a review of a tenant’s credit quality. In addition, we consistently monitor the credit quality of our portfolio by actively reviewing the creditworthiness of certain tenants, focusing primarily on those tenants representing the greatest concentration of our portfolio. This review primarily includes an analysis of the tenant’s financial statements either quarterly, or as frequently as the lease permits. We also consider tenant credit quality when assessing our portfolio for strategic dispositions. When we assess tenant credit quality, we, among other factors that we may deem relevant: (i) review relevant financial information, including financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity; (ii) evaluate the depth and experience of the tenant’s management team; and (iii) assess the strength/growth of the tenant’s industry. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts arising from estimated losses that could result from the tenant’s inability to make required current rent payments and an allowance against accrued rental income for future potential losses that we deem to be unrecoverable over the term of the lease. The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We are of the opinion that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants and mitigation options.

5

Table of Contents

Real Estate Investments
As of December 31, 2017 , omitting the Excluded Property, the Company owned 4,091 operating properties comprising 94.4 million square feet of retail and commercial space located in 49 states, Puerto Rico and Canada, which includes properties owned through consolidated joint ventures. The rentable space at these properties was 98.8% leased with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years. There were no tenants exceeding 10% of our consolidated annualized rental income as of  December 31, 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . As of December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , properties located in Texas represented  12.8% , 13.5% and 13.1%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. As of December 31, 2017 , tenants in the casual dining restaurant and manufacturing industries accounted for  13.8% and 10.1% , respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. As of  December 31, 2016 , tenants in the casual dining restaurant and manufacturing industries accounted for 15.6% and 10.1%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. As of  December 31, 2015 , tenants in the casual dining restaurant and manufacturing industries accounted for 16.6% and 10.1%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. 
Financing Policies
We rely on leverage to allow us to invest in a greater number of assets and enhance our asset returns. We expect our leverage metrics to improve over time.
We intend to finance future acquisitions with the most advantageous source of capital available to us at the time of the transaction, which may include a combination of public and private offerings of our equity and debt securities, secured and unsecured corporate-level debt, property-level debt and mortgage financing and other public, private or bank debt. In addition, we may acquire properties in exchange for the issuance of common stock or OP Units and we may acquire properties subject to existing mortgage indebtedness.
We also may obtain secured or unsecured debt to acquire properties, and we expect that our financing sources will include the public debt market, banks and institutional investment firms, including asset managers and life insurance companies. Although we intend to maintain a conservative capital structure, our charter does not contain a specific limitation on the amount of debt we may incur and the Board of Directors may implement or change target debt levels at any time without the approval of our stockholders.
We intend to continue to emphasize unsecured corporate-level or OP-level debt in our financing and to seek to reduce the percentage of our assets which are secured by mortgage loans. For information relating to our Credit Facility, see “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources .”
Competition
We are subject to competition in the acquisition and disposition of properties and in the leasing of our properties. We compete with a number of developers, owners and operators of retail, restaurant, office and industrial real estate, many of which own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located. We also may face new competitors and, due to our focus on single-tenant properties located throughout the United States, and because many of our competitors are locally or regionally focused, we do not expect to encounter the same competitors in each region of the United States. Our competitors may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments and may succeed in buying the properties that we have targeted for acquisition. We may also incur costs in connection with unsuccessful acquisitions that we will not be able to recover. Foreign investors may view the U.S. real estate market as being more stable than other international markets and may increase investments in high-quality single-tenant properties, especially in gateway cities.
Regulations
Our investments are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws, ordinances and regulations, including, among other things, health, safety and zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all material permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments.
Our properties are also subject to laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), which require that all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Some of our properties may currently not be in compliance with the ADA. If one or more of the properties in our portfolio is not in compliance with the ADA or any other regulatory requirements, we may be required to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance.
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current owner of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up contaminated property. Under these laws, courts and government agencies have the authority to impose cleanup

6

Table of Contents

responsibility and liability even if the owner did not know of and was not responsible for the contamination. For example, liability can be imposed upon us based on the activities of our tenants or a prior owner. In addition to the cost of the cleanup, environmental contamination on a property may adversely affect the value of the property and our ability to sell, rent or finance the property, and may adversely impact our investment in that property.
Prior to acquisition of a property, we will obtain Phase I environmental reports, or will rely on recent Phase I environmental reports. These reports will be prepared in accordance with an appropriate level of due diligence based on our standards and generally include a physical site inspection, a review of relevant federal, state and local environmental and health agency database records, one or more interviews with appropriate site-related personnel, review of the property’s chain of title and review of historic aerial photographs and other information on past uses of the property and nearby or adjoining properties. We may also obtain a Phase II investigation which may include limited subsurface investigations and tests for substances of concern where the results of the Phase I environmental reports or other information indicates possible contamination or where our consultants recommend such procedures.
Employees
As of December 31, 2017 , we had approximately 330 employees. Following the closing of the Cole Capital sale, approximately 100 of these employees were employed by the Cole Purchaser.
Available Information
We electronically file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and proxy statements, with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or you may access them through the EDGAR database at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from the website maintained for us at www.ir.vereit.com. We are providing our website address solely for the information of investors. We do not intend for the information contained on our website to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or other filings with the SEC.
Supplemental U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
This summary is for general information purposes only and is not tax advice. This discussion does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to particular holders of our securities in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances.
Recent Legislation
The recently enacted “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the “TCJA”), generally applicable for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 , made significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), including a number of provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that affect the taxation of businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders.
Among other changes, the TCJA made the following changes:  
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, (i) the U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income of individuals, trusts and estates have been generally reduced and (ii) non-corporate taxpayers are permitted to take a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received from REITs that are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, subject to certain limitations.
The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for corporations has been reduced from 35% to 21%, and corporate alternative minimum tax has been eliminated for corporations, which would generally reduce the amount of U.S. federal income tax payable by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and by us to the extent we were subject to corporate U.S. federal income tax (for example, if we distributed less than 100% of our taxable income or recognized built-in gains in assets acquired from C corporations). In addition, the maximum withholding rate on distributions by us to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a U.S. real property interest is reduced from 35% to 21%.
Certain new limitations on the deductibility of interest expense now apply, which limitations may affect the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by us or our TRSs. However, a taxpayer that qualifies as a real estate business may elect to be exempt from such limitations on the deductibility of interest expense.
Certain new limitations on net operating losses now apply, which limitations may affect net operating losses generated by us or our TRSs.
A U.S. tax-exempt stockholder that is subject to tax on its unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) will be required to separately compute its taxable income and loss for each unrelated trade or business activity for purposes of determining its UBTI.

7

Table of Contents

New accounting rules generally require us to recognize income items for federal income tax purposes no later than when we take the item into account for financial statement purposes, which may accelerate our recognition of certain income items.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investors should carefully consider the following factors, together with all the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating the Company and our business.  If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, the trading price of the General Partner's securities could decline and its stockholders and/or the Operating Partnership's unitholders may lose all or part of their investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.  This “Risk Factors” section contains references to our “capital stock” and to our “stockholders” and “unitholders.” Unless expressly stated otherwise, references to our “capital stock” represent the General Partner’s common stock and any class or series of its preferred stock, references to our “stockholders” represent holders of the General Partner’s common stock and any class or series of its preferred stock and references to our “unitholders” represent holders of the OP units and any class of series of the Operating Partnership’s preferred units.
Risks Related to Our Business
We are primarily dependent on single-tenant leases for our revenue and, accordingly, if we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We focus our investment activities on ownership of freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties that are net leased to a single tenant. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default by, a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, to the extent that we enter into a master lease with a particular tenant, a default specific to a particular property could result in a termination of the entire master lease, resulting in the loss of revenue from all such properties.
We cannot assure you that our leases will be renewed or that we will be able to lease or re-lease the properties on favorable terms, or at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the properties at a loss. Any of our properties that become vacant could be difficult to re-lease or sell. We have and may continue to experience vacancies either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. We typically must incur all of the costs of ownership for a property that is vacant. Upon or pending the expiration of leases at our properties, we may be required to make rent or other concessions to tenants, or accommodate requests for lower rents, remodeling and other improvements, in order to retain and attract tenants. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant ( e.g. , a retail bank branch or distribution warehouse) and major renovations and expenditures may be required in order for us to re-lease the space for other uses. If the vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues, resulting in less cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders. If we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to certain tenants, geographic areas or industries.
As of December 31, 2017 , we had derived approximately:
$75.4 million , or 6.5% , of our annualized rental income from Red Lobster®, a wholly owned subsidiary of Golden Gate Capital;
$343.8 million , or 29.8% , of our annualized rental income from properties located in the following four states: Texas ( 12.8% ), Ohio ( 5.9% ), Florida ( 5.6% ), and Illinois ( 5.5% ); and
$612.7 million , or 53.0% , of our annualized rental income from tenants in the following six industries: the casual dining restaurant industry ( 13.8% ), the manufacturing industry ( 10.1% ), the quick service restaurant industry ( 8.9% ), the discount retail industry ( 8.1% ), the pharmacy retail industry ( 7.1% ) and the grocery & supermarket retail industry ( 5.0% ).
Any adverse change in the financial condition of a tenant with whom we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, or any downturn of the economy in any state or industry in which we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.

8

Table of Contents

Our net leases may require us to pay property-related expenses that are not the obligations of our tenants.
Under the terms of the majority of our net leases, in addition to satisfying their rent obligations, our tenants are responsible for the payment or reimbursement of property expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. However, under the provisions of certain existing leases and leases that we may enter into in the future with our tenants, we may be required to pay some or all of the expenses of the property, such as the costs of environmental liabilities, roof and structural repairs, real estate taxes, insurance, certain non-structural repairs and maintenance. If our properties incur significant expenses that must be paid by us under the terms of our leases, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders may be reduced.
Our properties may be subject to impairment charges.
We routinely evaluate our real estate investments for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions and tenant performance. For example, the early termination of, or default under, a lease by a tenant may lead to an impairment charge. Since our investment focus is on properties net leased to a single tenant, the financial failure of, or other default by, a single tenant under its lease(s) may result in a significant impairment loss. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, we would be required to make a downward adjustment to the net carrying value of the property, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge is recorded. Management has recorded impairment charges related to certain properties in the year ended December 31, 2017 , and may record future impairments based on actual results and changes in circumstances. Negative developments in the real estate market may cause management to reevaluate the business and macro-economic assumptions used in its impairment analysis. Changes in management’s assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. See “ Note 9 – Fair Value Measures ” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of real estate impairment charges.
Our ownership of certain properties and other facilities are subject to ground leases or other similar agreements which limit our uses of these properties and may restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer such properties.
As of December 31, 2017 , we held interests in properties and other facilities through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located and we may acquire additional properties in the future that are subject to ground leases or other similar agreements. As of December 31, 2017 , the costs associated with these ground leases represented 2.0% of annualized rental revenue. Many of our ground leases and other similar agreements limit our uses of these properties and may restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer such properties without the ground landlord’s consent, which may impair their value.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and therefore we may not be able to dispose of properties when appropriate or on favorable terms.
Real estate investments are, in general, relatively illiquid and may become even more illiquid during periods of economic downturn. As a result, we may not be able to sell our properties quickly or on favorable terms in response to changes in the economy or other conditions when it otherwise may be prudent to do so. In addition, certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including debt service obligations, real estate taxes, and operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings. Further, as a result of the 100% prohibited transactions tax applicable to REITs, we intend to hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be favorable. Therefore, we may be unable to adjust our portfolio promptly in response to economic, market or other conditions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our investments in properties where the underlying tenant has a below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating agencies, or where the tenant is not rated may have a greater risk of default.
As of December 31, 2017 , approximately 60.4% of our tenants were not rated or did not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency or were not affiliates of companies having an investment grade credit rating. Our investments in properties leased to such tenants may have a greater risk of default and bankruptcy than investments in properties leased exclusively to investment grade tenants. When we invest in properties where the tenant does not have a publicly available credit rating, we will use certain credit-assessment tools as well as rely on our own estimates of the tenant’s credit rating which includes reviewing the tenant’s financial information ( e.g. , financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity, if applicable). If our ratings estimates are inaccurate, the default or bankruptcy risk for the subject tenant may be greater than anticipated. If our lender or a credit rating agency disagrees with our ratings estimates, we may not be able to obtain our desired level of leverage or

9

Table of Contents

our financing costs may exceed those that we projected. This outcome could have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and hence our operating results.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, including as a result of uncertain market conditions, which could adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
We expect to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our investment business objectives and REIT limitations. We generally intend to hold properties for an extended time, but our management or Board of Directors may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property to achieve investment objectives. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms or at all depends on certain factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell such properties at a profit or at all in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which our stockholders and unitholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will depend upon fluctuating market conditions. Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold.
Dividends paid from sources other than our cash flow from operations could affect our profitability, restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and dilute stockholders’ and unitholders’ interests in us.
We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to pay dividends and we may in the future pay dividends from sources other than from our cash flow from operations, such as borrowings and/or the sale of assets or the proceeds from offerings of securities. We have not established any limit on the amount of borrowings and/or the sale of assets or the proceeds from an offering of securities that may be used to fund dividends, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make dividend distributions that would: (1) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (2) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences; or (3) jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT.
Funding dividends from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding dividends with the sale of assets or the proceeds of offerings of securities may affect our ability to generate cash flows. In addition, funding dividends from the sale of additional securities could dilute your interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock or securities that are convertible or exercisable into shares of our common stock to third party investors. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced. Payment of dividends from these sources could affect our profitability, restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and dilute stockholders’ and unitholders’ interests in us, any or all of which may adversely affect your overall return.
We could face potential adverse effects from the bankruptcies or insolvencies of tenants or from tenant defaults generally.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. Under bankruptcy law, a tenant cannot be evicted solely because of its bankruptcy and has the option to assume or reject any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent will be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and it is unlikely that a bankrupt tenant that rejects its lease would pay in full amounts it owes us under the lease. Even if a lease is assumed and brought current, we still run the risk that a tenant could condition lease assumption on a restructuring of certain terms, including rent, that would have an adverse impact on us. Any shortfall resulting from the bankruptcy of one or more of our tenants could adversely affect our cash flows and results of operations and could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
In addition, the financial failure of, or other default by, one or more of the tenants to whom we have exposure could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations. While we evaluate the creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing available financial and other pertinent information, there can be no assurance that any tenant will be able to make timely rental payments or avoid defaulting under its lease. If any of our tenants’ businesses experience significant adverse changes, they may fail to make rental payments when due, close a number of stores, exercise early termination rights (to the extent such rights are available to the tenant) or declare bankruptcy. A default by a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, if a tenant defaults, we may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment.

10

Table of Contents

If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized in a tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We have entered and may continue to enter into sale-leaseback transactions. In a sale-leaseback transaction, we purchase a property and then lease it back to the third party from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as a sale-leaseback might possibly be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcomes could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows and the amount available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders.
If a sale-leaseback is re-characterized as a financing, we would not be considered the owner of the property and, as a result, would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback is re-characterized as a joint venture, our lessee and we could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the lessee relating to the property.
We have a history of operating losses and cannot assure you that we will maintain profitability.
Since our inception in 2010, we have experienced net losses (calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP) and as of December 31, 2017 , had an accumulated deficit of $4.78 billion . The extent of our future operating losses and the timing of when we will achieve profitability are uncertain, and together depend on the demand for, and value of, our portfolio of properties. We may never achieve or sustain profitability.
We may be unable to enter into and consummate property acquisitions on advantageous terms or our property acquisitions may not perform as we expect due to competitive conditions and other factors.
We may acquire properties in the future. The acquisition of properties entails various risks, including the risks that our investments may not perform as we expect and that our cost estimates for bringing an acquired property up to market standards may prove inaccurate. Further, we expect to finance any future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings under our unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), proceeds from equity or debt offerings by the General Partner, the Operating Partnership or their subsidiaries, funds from operations and proceeds from property contributions and dispositions which, if unavailable, could adversely affect our cash flows.
In addition, our ability to acquire properties in the future on satisfactory terms and successfully integrate and operate such properties is subject to the following significant risks:
we may be unable to acquire desired properties or the purchase price of a desired property may increase significantly because of competition from other real estate investors, including other real estate operating companies, REITs and investment funds;
we may acquire properties that are not accretive to our earnings upon acquisition;
we may be unable to obtain the necessary debt or equity financing to consummate an acquisition or, if obtainable, financing may not be on satisfactory terms;
we may need to spend more than budgeted amounts to make necessary improvements or renovations to acquired properties;
agreements for the acquisition of properties are typically subject to customary conditions to closing, including satisfactory completion of due diligence investigations, and we may spend significant time and money on potential acquisitions that we do not consummate;
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations; and
we may acquire properties without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, for liabilities, whether known or unknown, such as cleanup of environmental contamination, remediation of latent defects, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.
Any of the above risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

11

Table of Contents

We have assumed, and may in the future assume, liabilities in connection with our property acquisitions, including unknown liabilities.
We have assumed existing liabilities, some of which may have been unknown or unquantifiable at the time of the transaction. Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions, claims of tenants or other persons dealing with prior owners of the properties, tax liabilities, and accrued but unpaid liabilities whether incurred in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. If the magnitude of such unknown liabilities is high, either singly or in the aggregate, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
We face intense competition, which may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.
We are subject to competition in the leasing of our properties. We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of retail, restaurant, industrial and office real estate, many of which have greater financial and other resources than us. Many of our competitors own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located. If one of our properties is nearing the end of the lease term or becomes vacant and our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge or to offer substantial rent concessions in order to retain tenants when such tenants’ lease expire or attract new tenants. In addition, if our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in the same markets and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at all or at favorable pricing or on favorable terms. As a result of these actions by our competitors, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may be adversely affected.
The value of our real estate investments is subject to risks associated with our real estate assets and with the real estate industry.
Our real estate investments are subject to various risks, fluctuations and cycles in value and demand, many of which are beyond our control. Certain events may decrease our cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders, as well as the value of our properties. These events include, but are not limited to:
adverse changes in international, national or local economic and demographic conditions;
vacancies or our inability to lease space on favorable terms, including possible market pressures to offer tenants rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights or tenant-favorable renewal options;
adverse changes in financial conditions of buyers, sellers and tenants of properties;
inability to collect rent from tenants, or other failures by tenants to perform the obligations under their leases;
competition from other real estate investors, including other real estate operating companies, REITs and institutional investment funds;
reductions in the level of demand for commercial space generally, and freestanding net leased properties specifically, and changes in the relative popularity of our properties;
increases in the supply of freestanding single-tenant properties;
fluctuations in interest rates, which could adversely affect our ability, or the ability of buyers and tenants of our properties, to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all;
increases in expenses, including, but not limited to, insurance costs, labor costs, energy prices, real estate assessments and other taxes and costs of compliance with laws, regulations and governmental policies, all of which have an adverse impact on the rent a tenant may be willing to pay us in order to lease one or more of our properties;
loss of property rights, adverse impacts on our tenants’ business operations and/or increases in tenant vacancies resulting from eminent domain proceedings;
civil unrest, acts of God, including earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters, including extreme weather events from possible future climate change, which may result in uninsured losses, and acts of war or terrorism; and
changes in, and changes in enforcement of, laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety, environmental, zoning and tax laws, governmental fiscal policies and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Any or all of these factors could materially adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs.

12

Table of Contents

Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could materially adversely affect our financial condition and cash flows, and there can be no assurance as to future costs and the scope of coverage that may be available under insurance policies.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under one or more blanket insurance policies with policy specifications, limits and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. In addition, we carry professional liability and directors’ and officers’ insurance, and cyber liability insurance. We select policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, insurance coverages provided by tenants, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. There can be no assurance, however, that the insured limits on any particular policy will adequately cover an insured loss if one occurs. If any such loss is insured, we may be required to pay a significant deductible on any claim for recovery of such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us for the loss, or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage for the loss. In addition, we may reduce or discontinue terrorism, earthquake, flood or other insurance on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss. Our title insurance policies may not insure for the current aggregate market value of our portfolio, and we do not intend to increase our title insurance coverage as the market value of our portfolio increases.
Further, we do not carry insurance for certain losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by riots, war or nuclear explosions. Certain types of losses may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, riots or acts of war. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. In addition, we carry several different lines of insurance, placed with several large insurance carriers. If any one of these large insurance carriers were to become insolvent, we would be forced to replace the existing insurance coverage with another suitable carrier, and any outstanding claims would be at risk for collection. In such an event, we cannot be certain that we would be able to replace the coverage at similar or otherwise favorable terms. As a result of any of the situations described above, our financial condition and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
Our participation in joint ventures creates additional risks as compared to direct real estate investments, and the actions of our joint venture partners could adversely affect our operations or performance .
We have in the past participated, and may in the future participate, in transactions structured to purchase assets jointly with unaffiliated third parties (a “joint venture”). There are additional risks involved in joint venture transactions. As a co-investor in a joint venture, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority relating to the property, joint venture, or other entity. In addition, there is the potential of the third-party participant in the joint venture becoming bankrupt and the possibility of diverging or inconsistent economic or business interests of us and that participant. These diverging interests could result in, among other things, exposure to liabilities of the joint venture in excess of our proportionate share of these liabilities. The competing rights of each owner in a jointly-owned property could effect a reduction in the value of each owner’s interest in the subject property.
If we are unable to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and effective internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence and our stock price could be adversely affected.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, however, there can be no guarantee as to the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and we cannot assure you that our internal control over financial reporting will not be subject to material weaknesses in the future. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Government investigations relating to the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation may result in significant legal expenses, fines, and/or penalties, including indemnification obligations, and cause our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations to suffer.
On November 13, 2014, we received the first of two subpoenas relating to the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation from the staff of the SEC, each of which called for the production of certain documents. On December 19, 2014, we received a subpoena from the Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York also contacted counsel for the Company and counsel for the Audit Committee. We

13

Table of Contents

are cooperating with these regulators in their investigations. The amount of time needed to resolve these investigations is uncertain, and, although the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York has indicated that it does not intend to bring criminal charges against the Company arising from its investigation, we cannot predict the outcome of other investigations or whether we will face additional government investigations, inquiries or other actions related to these matters. Subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our current and former directors, officers and employees, among others in connection with the ongoing government investigations and potential future government inquiries, investigations or actions, including advancement of legal fees. These matters could result in actions seeking, among other things, injunctions against us and the payment of significant fines and/or penalties, as well as requiring payment of substantial legal fees and indemnification obligations, and cause our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations to suffer. We can provide no assurance as to the outcome of any government investigation.
The Company and certain of our former officers and directors, among others, have been named as defendants in various lawsuits related to the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation which have resulted in significant legal expenses which are expected to continue. Any resolution could require substantial payments by the Company, including indemnification obligations, and may materially impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Since the October 29, 2014 announcement of the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation and the subsequent restatement of the Company’s financial statements in March 2015, the Company and its former officers and directors (along with others) have been named as defendants in multiple putative securities class action complaints in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which were subsequently consolidated under the caption In re American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Litigation , 1:15-mc-00040-AKH, multiple individual securities lawsuits and multiple derivative lawsuits. See “Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding pending litigation matters related to the Audit Committee Investigation.
As a result of the various pending litigations, and subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to advance certain legal expenses to and indemnify our current and former directors, officers and employees, as well as certain outside individuals and entities. These lawsuits have resulted in significant ongoing legal expenses, which are expected to continue. The resolution of these matters, and the timing thereof, are uncertain. Any such resolution, whether through a judgment or a settlement, could require substantial payments by the Company, including potential indemnification obligations, which in large part are not expected to be covered by insurance, and may materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial position and results of operations, and they require management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial position and results of operations. We have identified several accounting policies as being critical to the presentation of our financial position and results of operations because they require management to make particularly subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be recorded under different conditions or using different assumptions. Because of the inherent uncertainty of the estimates, judgments, and assumptions associated with these critical accounting policies, we cannot provide any assurance that we will not make subsequent significant adjustments to our consolidated financial statements. If our judgments, assumptions, and allocations prove to be incorrect, or if circumstances change, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Changes in U.S. accounting standards regarding operating leases may make the leasing of our properties less attractive to our potential tenants, which could reduce overall demand for our leasing services.
Under current authoritative accounting guidance for leases, a lease is classified by a tenant as a capital lease if the significant risks and rewards of ownership are considered to reside with the tenant. Under capital lease accounting for a tenant, both the leased asset and liability are reflected on its balance sheet. If the lease does not meet the criteria for a capital lease, the lease is to be considered an operating lease by the tenant, and the obligation does not appear on the tenant’s balance sheet; rather, the contractual future minimum payment obligations are only disclosed in the footnotes thereto. Thus, entering into an operating lease can appear to enhance a tenant’s balance sheet in comparison to direct ownership. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”) conducted a joint project to re-evaluate lease accounting. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”) which will require that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability and the disclosure of key information about the entity's leasing arrangements. These and other potential changes to the accounting guidance could affect both our accounting for leases as well as that of our current and potential tenants. These changes may affect how our real estate leasing business is conducted. For example, with the ASU 2016-02 revision, companies may be less willing to enter into leases in general or desire to enter into

14

Table of Contents

leases with shorter terms because the apparent benefits to their balance sheets under current practice could be reduced or eliminated. This impact in turn could make it more difficult for us to enter into leases on terms we find favorable. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company expects the accounting for leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee to change and is currently evaluating the impact. Leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee primarily consist of corporate offices and ground leases.
We may not be able to maintain our competitive advantages if we are not able to attract and retain key personnel.
Our success depends to a significant extent on our ability to attract and retain key members of our executive team and staff. Our future success depends in part on the continued service of our senior management team. If there are changes in senior leadership, such changes could be disruptive and could compromise our ability to execute our strategic plan. While we have entered into employment agreements with certain key personnel, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain the services of individuals whose knowledge and skills are important to our businesses. Our success also depends on our ability to prospectively attract, integrate, train and retain qualified management personnel. Because the competition for qualified personnel is intense, costs related to compensation and retention could increase significantly in the future. If we were to lose a sufficient number of our key employees and were unable to replace them in a reasonable period of time, these losses could damage our business and adversely affect our results of operations.
Competition that traditional retail tenants face from e-commerce retail sales, or the integration of brick and mortar stores with e-commerce retailers, could adversely affect our business.
Our retail tenants face increasing competition from e-commerce retailers. E-commerce sales have accounted for an increasing percentage of retail sales over the past few years and this trend is expected to continue. These trends may have an impact on decisions that retailers make regarding their brick and mortar stores. Changes in shopping trends as a result of the growth in e-commerce may also impact the profitability of retailers that do not adapt to changes in market conditions. The continued growth of e-commerce sales could decrease the need for traditional retail outlets and reduce retailers' space and property requirements. These conditions could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows if we are unable to meet the needs of our tenants or if our tenants encounter financial difficulties as a result of changing market conditions.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant and investor relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results, operations, business relationships or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.
We may acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions, which could result in the dilution of our stockholders and unitholders, and limit our ability to sell or refinance such assets.
We have in the past and may in the future acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions in exchange for OP Units. Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding the OP Units for a period of one year, unless otherwise consented to by the General Partner, holders of OP Units have a right to redeem the OP Units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of the General Partner’s common stock or, at the option of the General Partner, a corresponding number of shares of the General Partner’s common stock. This could result in the dilution of our stockholders and unitholders through the issuance of OP Units that may be exchanged for shares of our common stock.  This acquisition structure may also have the effect of, among other things, reducing the amount of tax depreciation we could deduct over the tax life of the acquired properties, and may require that we agree to restrictions on our ability to dispose of, or refinance the debt on, the acquired properties in order to protect the contributors’ ability to defer recognition of taxable gain.  Similarly, we may be required to incur or maintain debt we would otherwise not incur so we can allocate the debt to the contributors to maintain their tax bases.  These restrictions could limit our ability to sell or refinance an asset at a time, or on terms, that would be favorable absent such restrictions.

15

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Financing
We intend to rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if we encounter difficulty in obtaining such capital, we may not be able to meet maturing obligations or make any additional investments.
In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required, among other things, to distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. Because of this dividend requirement, we may not be able to fund from cash retained from operations all of our future capital needs, including capital needed to refinance maturing obligations or make investments.
Market volatility and disruption could hinder our ability to obtain new debt financing or refinance our maturing debt on favorable terms or at all or to raise debt and equity capital. Our access to capital will depend upon a number of factors, including:
general market conditions;
the market’s perception of our future growth potential;
the extent of investor interest;
analyst reports about us and the REIT industry;
the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;
our financial performance and that of our tenants;
our current debt levels;
our current and expected future earnings;
our cash flow and cash dividends, including our ability to satisfy the dividend requirements applicable to REITs; and
the market price per share of our common stock.
If we are unable to obtain needed capital on satisfactory terms or at all, we may not be able to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature or make any additional investments.
We have substantial amounts of indebtedness outstanding, which may affect our ability to pay dividends, and may expose us to interest rate fluctuation risk and to the risk of default under our debt obligations.
As of December 31, 2017 , our aggregate indebtedness was $6.1 billion . We may incur significant additional debt in the future, including borrowings under our Credit Facility, for various purposes including, without limitation, the funding of future acquisitions, capital improvements and leasing commissions in connection with the repositioning of a property and litigation expenses. At December 31, 2017 , we had $2.1 billion of undrawn commitments under our Credit Facility. Our substantial outstanding indebtedness, and the limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements, could have significant adverse consequences, including as follows:
our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments;
we may be unable to borrow additional funds as needed or on satisfactory terms to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements, which could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to capitalize upon any acquisition opportunities or fund capital improvements and leasing commissions;
we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness;
payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to make the dividend payments necessary to maintain our REIT qualification or may otherwise impose restrictions on our ability to make distributions;
we may be forced to dispose of properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms;
we may violate restrictive covenants in our loan documents, which would entitle the lenders to accelerate our debt obligations;
certain of the property subsidiaries’ loan documents may include restrictions on such subsidiary’s ability to make dividends to us;
we may be unable to hedge floating-rate debt, counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under our hedge agreements, these agreements may not effectively hedge interest rate fluctuation risk, and, upon the expiration of any hedge agreements, we would be exposed to then-existing market rates of interest and future interest rate volatility;

16

Table of Contents

we may default on our obligations and the lenders or mortgagees may foreclose on our properties that secure their loans and exercise their rights under any assignment of rents and leases;
we may be vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and
we may be at a disadvantage compared to our competitors with less indebtedness.
If we default under a loan or indenture (including any default in respect of the financial maintenance and negative covenants contained in the Credit Agreement, or the indenture governing the Senior Notes, we may automatically be in default under any other loan or indenture that has cross-default provisions (including the credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”)), dated June 30, 2014, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as administrative agent, and other lender parties thereto, governing the Credit Facility), and (x) further borrowings under the Credit Facility will be prohibited, and outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, and our indenture (including the indenture governing the Senior Notes) or such other loans may be accelerated and (y) to the extent any such debt is secured, directly or indirectly, by any properties or assets, the lenders may foreclose on the properties or assets securing such indebtedness.
In addition, increases in interest rates may impede our operating performance and payments of required debt service obligations or amounts due at maturity, or creation of additional reserves under loan agreements or indentures, could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
Further, any foreclosure on our properties could create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, which could adversely affect our ability to meet the REIT dividend requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.
The indenture governing our Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement contain restrictive covenants that limit our operating flexibility.
The indenture governing our Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement require us to meet customary negative covenants and other financial and operating covenants. The indenture governing our Senior Notes requires us to maintain financial ratios for total leverage, secured debt, debt service coverage and total unencumbered assets. In addition, the Credit Agreement requires us, among other things, to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a secured leverage ratio, a total unencumbered asset value ratio, a minimum encumbered interest coverage ratio and a minimum encumbered asset value. These covenants restrict our ability to incur secured or unsecured indebtedness and may also restrict our ability to engage in certain business activities.
Our ability to comply with these and other provisions of the indenture governing our Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement may be affected by changes in our operating and financial performance, changes in general business and economic conditions, adverse regulatory developments or other events adversely impacting us. Any failure to comply with these covenants would constitute a default under the indenture governing our Senior Notes and/or the Credit Agreement, as applicable, and would prevent further borrowings under the Credit Agreement and could cause those and other obligations to become due and payable. If any of our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to repay it.
Our organizational documents have no limitation on the amount of indebtedness that we may incur. As a result, we may become more highly leveraged in the future, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our business strategy contemplates the use of both secured and unsecured debt to finance long-term growth. While we intend to limit our indebtedness, our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of debt that we may incur. Further, our financing decisions and related decisions regarding levels of debt may be determined by our Board of Directors in its discretion without stockholder approval. As a result, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, in the future, subject to us meeting the financial and operating covenants described above, which could result in us becoming more highly leveraged and adversely affecting our financial condition.
Increases in interest rates would increase our debt service obligations and may adversely affect the refinancing of our existing debt and our ability to incur additional debt, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Certain of our borrowings bear interest at variable rates, and we may incur additional variable-rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates would result in higher interest expenses on our existing unhedged variable rate debt, and increase the costs of refinancing existing debt or incurring new debt. Additionally, increases in interest rates may result in a decrease in the value of our real estate and decrease the market price of our capital stock and could accordingly adversely affect our financial condition.

17

Table of Contents

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to fund our operations, working capital and capital expenditures, depends on our ability to generate cash. To a certain extent, our cash flow is subject to general economic, industry, financial, competitive, operating, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future sources of cash will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay amounts due on our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Additionally, if we incur additional indebtedness in connection with any future acquisitions or development projects or for any other purpose, our debt service obligations could increase. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional financing will depend on, among other things:
our financial condition and market conditions at the time;
restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness;
general economic and capital market conditions;
the availability of credit from banks or other lenders;
investor confidence in us; and
our results of operations.
As a result, we may not be able to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and additional borrowings or refinancings or proceeds of asset sales or other sources of cash are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our obligations. Accordingly, if we cannot service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as seeking additional equity, or delaying any strategic acquisitions and alliances or capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.
Our Senior Notes are periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. Our current corporate credit and issue-level ratings for our Senior Notes are “BBB-” with a “stable” outlook from Standard & Poor’s Rating Services. Our corporate credit and issue-level ratings for our Senior Notes are “Baa3” with a “stable” outlook assigned by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. Our corporate credit and issue-level ratings for our Senior Notes are “BBB-“ with a “stable” outlook assigned by Fitch Ratings, Inc. The credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook in general. Our credit ratings can adversely affect the cost and availability of capital, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Since we depend in part on debt financing to fund our business, an adverse change in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and the trading price of our Senior Notes.
Risks Related to Equity
The Board of Directors may create and issue a class or series of common or preferred stock without stockholder approval.
Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the Board of Directors is empowered under our charter to amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue, to designate and issue from time to time one or more classes or series of stock and to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock without stockholder approval. The Board of Directors may determine the relative preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications or terms or conditions of redemption of any class or series of stock issued. As a result, we may issue series or classes of stock with voting rights, rights to dividends or other rights, senior to the rights of holders of our outstanding capital stock. The issuance of any such stock could also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control transaction that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, future sales of shares of our common stock or preferred stock may be dilutive to existing stockholders.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations.
The sales price of our common stock on the NYSE has fluctuated in recent quarters. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, including as a result of future offerings of our securities, as a result of the events described in this “ Risk Factors ” section or in our future filings with the SEC, and as a result of changes to our dividend yield relative to yields on other financial instruments (e.g., increases in interest rates resulting in higher yields on other financial instruments may adversely

18

Table of Contents

affect the sales price of our common stock). In addition, the trading volume and price of our common stock may fluctuate and be adversely impacted in response to a number of factors, including:
actual or anticipated variations in our operating results, earnings, or liquidity, or those of our competitors;
changes in our dividend policy;
publication of research reports about us, our competitors, our tenants, or the REIT industry;
changes in market valuations of companies similar to us;
speculation in the press or investment community;
our failure to meet, or changes to, our earnings estimates, or those of any securities analysts;
increases in market interest rates;
adverse market reaction to the amount of or the maturity of our debt and our ability to refinance such debt and the terms thereof;
adverse market reaction to any additional indebtedness we incur or equity or securities we may issue;
changes in our credit ratings;
changes in our key management;
the financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and prospects of our tenants;
litigation and government investigations;
failure to maintain our REIT qualification; and
general market and economic conditions, including the current state of the credit and capital markets.
The issuance of additional equity securities may dilute existing equity holders.
Giving effect to the issuance of common stock in future potential offerings, the receipt of future potential net proceeds and the use of those proceeds, additional equity offerings may have a dilutive effect on our expected earnings per share. Additionally, we are not restricted from issuing additional shares of our common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities in the future. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market or the perception that such sales could occur.
Future offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stock upon liquidation, or preferred equity securities that may be senior to our common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
In the future, we may issue debt or preferred equity securities. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings, including offerings of convertible preferred stock, may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or otherwise reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on distribution payments that could limit our ability to make distributions to holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their stock holdings in us.
The change of control conversion feature of the Series F Preferred Stock may make it more difficult for a party to take over the Company or discourage a party from taking over the Company.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the Articles Supplementary for the Series F Preferred Stock) the result of which is that our common stock or the common securities of the acquiring or surviving entity are not listed on a national stock exchange, holders of the Series F Preferred Stock will have the right (unless, prior to the change of control conversion date, we have provided or provide notice of our election to redeem the Series F Preferred Stock) to convert some or all of their Series F Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock (or equivalent value of alternative consideration). The change of control conversion feature of the Series F Preferred Stock may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for the Company or of delaying, deferring or preventing certain change of control transactions of the Company under circumstances that stockholders may otherwise believe are in their best interests.

19

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to our Real Estate Investments
Because we own real property, we are subject to extensive environmental regulation, which creates uncertainty regarding future environmental expenditures and liabilities.
Environmental laws regulate, and impose liability for, releases of hazardous or toxic substances into the environment. Under various provisions of these laws, an owner or operator of real estate, such as us, is or may be liable for costs related to soil or groundwater contamination on, in, or migrating to or from its property. In addition, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may be liable for the costs of cleaning up contamination at the disposal site. Such laws often impose liability regardless of whether the person knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances that caused the contamination. The presence of, or contamination resulting from, any of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate them, may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease our property or to borrow using such property as collateral. In addition, persons exposed to hazardous or toxic substances may sue us for personal injury damages. As a result, in connection with our current or former ownership, operation, management and development of real properties, we may be potentially liable for investigation and cleanup costs, penalties, and damages under environmental laws.
Although our properties are generally subjected to preliminary environmental assessments, known as Phase I assessments, by independent environmental consultants that identify certain liabilities, Phase I assessments are limited in scope, and may not include or identify all potential environmental liabilities or risks associated with the property. Further, any environmental liabilities that arose since the date the studies were done would not be identified in the assessments. Unless required by applicable laws or regulations, we may not further investigate, remedy or ameliorate the liabilities disclosed in the Phase I assessments.
We cannot assure you that these or other environmental studies identified all potential environmental liabilities, or that we will not incur material environmental liabilities in the future. If we do incur material environmental liabilities in the future, we may face significant remediation costs, and we may find it difficult to finance or sell any affected properties.
We are subject to risks relating to mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans.
Investing in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans involves risk of defaults on those loans caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. If there are defaults under these loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell quickly any properties securing such loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of any lawsuit brought in connection with the foreclosure if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan, which could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loan.
We are subject to risks relating to real estate-related securities, including commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”).
Real estate-related securities are often unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in real estate-related securities may be subject to risks of (1) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market in the case of unlisted or thinly traded securities, (2) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates in the case of traded equity securities, (3) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer, (4) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (5) the possibility that earnings of the issuer or that income from collateral may be insufficient to meet debt service and distribution obligations and (6) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic slowdown or downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding real estate-related securities and the ability of the obliged parties to repay principal and interest or make distribution payments.
CMBS are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, these securities are subject to the risks listed above and all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. CMBS are issued by investment banks and non-regulated financial institutions, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government. The value of CMBS may change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities market as a whole and may be negatively impacted by any dislocation in the mortgage-backed securities market in general.
CMBS are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate CMBS are paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes delinquent loans, there is a risk that interest payments on subordinate CMBS will not be fully paid. Subordinate CMBS are also subject to greater credit

20

Table of Contents

risk than those CMBS that are more highly rated. In certain instances, third-party guarantees or other forms of credit support can reduce the credit risk.
Our build-to-suit acquisitions are subject to additional risks related to properties under development.
From time to time, we engage in build-to-suit acquisitions and the acquisition of properties under development. In connection with these businesses, we enter into purchase and sale arrangements with sellers or developers of suitable properties under development or construction. In such cases, we are generally obligated to purchase the property at the completion of construction, provided that the construction conforms to definitive plans, specifications, and costs approved by us in advance, and if other conditions have been met such as there is an effective lease for the property, the tenant has accepted the property and commenced paying rent. We may also engage in development and construction activities involving existing properties, including the expansion of existing facilities (typically at the request of a tenant) or the development or build-out of vacant space at retail properties. We may advance significant amounts in connection with certain development projects.
As a result, we are subject to potential development risks and construction delays and the resultant increased costs and risks, as well as the risk of loss of certain amounts that we have advanced should a development project not be completed. To the extent that we engage in development or construction projects, we may be subject to uncertainties associated with obtaining permits or re-zoning for development, environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and the builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a developer or builder fails to perform, we may terminate the purchase, modify the construction contract or resort to legal action to compel performance (or in certain cases, we may elect to take over the project and pursue completion of the project ourselves). A developer’s or builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond that party’s control. Delays in obtaining permits or completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases.
We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased project costs or the loss of our investment. Although we rarely engage in construction activities relating to space that is not already leased to one or more tenants, to the extent that we do so, we may be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also will rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If these projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property and our return on our investment could suffer. If we contract with a development company for a newly developed property, there is a risk that money advanced to that development company for the project may not be fully recoverable if the developer fails to successfully complete the project.
Risks Related to the Services Agreement
Our continuing obligation to provide services to Cole Capital under the Services Agreement could have an adverse effect on our business operations.

In connection with the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we entered into the Services Agreement, pursuant to which we will continue to provide certain services, including operational real estate support, through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by CCA . Under the terms of the Services Agreement, we will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided and fees based on the future revenues of CCA above a specified dollar threshold (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments. There is no assurance that we will be successful in managing these services so that they do not have an adverse effect on our business operations and there can be no assurance that we will receive any Net Revenue Payments after February 1, 2018, under the Services Agreement.

We are subject to conflicts of interest relating to the Cole REITs.

During the initial term of the Services Agreement, property acquisition opportunities will be allocated among us and the real estate programs sponsored by CCA pursuant to an asset allocation policy and in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement. The Cole REITs have characteristics, including targeted investment types, and investment objectives and criteria substantially similar to our own. As a result, we may be seeking to acquire properties and real estate-related investments at the same time as the Cole REITs.
During the initial term of the Services Agreement, in the event that an investment opportunity is identified that may be suitable for more than one of us or the other programs sponsored by CCA and for which more than one of such entities has sufficient uninvested funds, then an allocation committee, which is comprised of employees of the Company and employees of CIM Group,

21

Table of Contents

LLC, CCA or their respective affiliates, will examine the following factors, among others, in determining the entity for which the investment opportunity is most appropriate:
the investment objective of each entity;
the anticipated operating cash flows of each entity and the cash requirements of each entity;
the effect of the acquisition both on diversification of each entity’s investments by type of property, geographic area and tenant concentration;
the amount of funds available to each entity and the length of time such funds have been available for investment;
the policy of each entity relating to leverage of properties;
the income tax effects of the purchase to each entity; and
the size of the investment.

If, in the judgment of the allocation committee, the investment opportunity may be equally appropriate for more than one program, then the entity that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was allocated an investment opportunity of a similar size and type ( e.g ., office, industrial, retail properties or anchored shopping centers) will be allocated such investment opportunity. If a subsequent development, such as a delay in the closing of the acquisition or a delay in the construction of a property, causes any such investment, in the opinion of the allocation committee, to be more appropriate for an entity other than the entity that committed to make the investment, the allocation committee may determine that the Company or a program sponsored by CCA will make the investment.

For programs sponsored by CCA that commenced operations on or after March 5, 2013, the Company retains a right of first refusal for all opportunities to acquire real estate and real estate-related assets or portfolios with a purchase price greater than $100 million. This right of first refusal applies to CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V, but does not apply to CCPT IV or INAV.

There can be no assurance that these policies will be adequate to address all of the conflicts that may arise or will address such conflicts in a manner that is favorable to us.

Risks Related to our Organization and Structure
We are a holding company with no direct operations. As a result, we rely on funds received from the Operating Partnership to pay liabilities and dividends, our stockholders’ claims will be structurally subordinated to all liabilities of the Operating Partnership and our stockholders do not have any voting rights with respect to the Operating Partnership’s activities, including the issuance of additional OP Units.
We are a holding company and conduct all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. We do not have, apart from our ownership of the Operating Partnership, any independent operations. As a result, we rely on distributions from the Operating Partnership to pay any dividends we might declare on shares of our common stock. We also rely on distributions from the Operating Partnership to meet our debt service and other obligations, including our obligations to make distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification. The ability of subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership to make distributions to the Operating Partnership, and the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions to us in turn, will depend on their operating results and on the terms of any loans that encumber the properties owned by them. Such loans may contain lockbox arrangements, reserve requirements, financial covenants and other provisions that restrict the distribution of funds. In the event of a default under these loans, the defaulting subsidiary would be prohibited from distributing cash. As a result, a default under any of these loans by the borrower subsidiaries could cause us to have insufficient cash to make distributions on our common stock required to maintain our REIT qualification.
In addition, because we are a holding company, stockholders’ claims will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations (whether or not for borrowed money) of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, claims of our stockholders will be satisfied only after all of our and the Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.
As of December 31, 2017 , we owned approximately 97.6% of the OP Units in the Operating Partnership. However, the Operating Partnership may issue additional OP Units in the future. Such issuances could reduce our ownership percentage in the Operating Partnership. Because our stockholders would not directly own any such OP Units, they would not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership-level activities of the Operating Partnership.

22

Table of Contents

Our charter and bylaws and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay or prevent a change of control transaction.
Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, limits any person to actual or constructive ownership of no more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock and not more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of our shares of stock. In addition, our charter provides that we may not consolidate, merge, sell all or substantially all of our assets or engage in a share exchange unless such actions are approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Board of Directors. The ownership limits and the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock and the Board approval requirements contained in our charter may delay or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Certain provisions in the LPA may delay, defer or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us.
Certain provisions in the LPA may delay or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions of us or changes in our control. These provisions could discourage third parties from making such proposals, although some stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable. These provisions include, among others:
redemption rights of qualifying parties;
the ability of the General Partner in some cases to amend the LPA without the consent of the limited partners;
the right of the limited partners to consent to transfers of the general partnership interest of the General Partner and mergers or consolidations of the Company under specified limited circumstances; and
restrictions relating to our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.
The LPA also contains other provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Tax protection provisions on certain properties could limit our operating flexibility.
We have agreed with ARC Real Estate Partners, LLC, an affiliate of ARC Properties Advisors, LLC (the “Former Manager”), to indemnify it against any adverse tax consequences if we were to sell, convey, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or any portion of the interests in the properties that were acquired by us in our formation transactions, in a taxable transaction. These tax protection provisions apply until September 6, 2021, which is the 10th anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering (“IPO”). Although it may be in our stockholders’ best interest that we sell one or more of these properties, it may be economically disadvantageous for us to do so because of these obligations. We have also agreed to make debt available for ARC Real Estate Partners, LLC to guarantee. We agreed to these provisions at the time of our IPO in order to assist ARC Real Estate Partners, LLC in preserving its tax position after its contribution of its interests in our initial properties. As a result, we may be required to incur and maintain more debt than we would otherwise.
The Company’s fiduciary duties as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership could create conflicts of interest.
The Company has fiduciary duties to the Operating Partnership and the limited partners in the Operating Partnership, the discharge of which may conflict with the interests of its stockholders. The LPA provides that, in the event of a conflict between the duties owed by the Company’s directors to the Company and the duties that the Company owes in its capacity as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership to the Operating Partnership’s limited partners, the Company’s directors are under no obligation to give priority to the interests of such limited partners. As a holder of OP Units, the Company will have the right to vote on certain amendments to the LPA (which require approval by a majority in interest of the limited partners, including the Company) and individually to approve certain amendments that would adversely affect the rights of the Operating Partnership’s limited partners, as well as the right to vote on mergers and consolidations of the Company in its capacity as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership in certain limited circumstances. These voting rights may be exercised in a manner that conflicts with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. For example, the Company cannot adversely affect the limited partners’ rights to receive distributions, as set forth in the LPA, without their consent, even though modifying such rights might be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders generally.
The Board of Directors may change significant corporate policies without stockholder approval.
Our investment, financing, borrowing and dividend policies and our policies with respect to other activities, including growth, debt, capitalization and operations, will be determined by the Board of Directors. These policies may be amended or revised at any time and from time to time at the discretion of the Board of Directors without a vote of our stockholders. In addition, the Board of Directors may change our policies with respect to conflicts of interest provided that such changes are consistent with applicable legal requirements. A change in these policies could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity

23

Table of Contents

and results of operations and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited under Maryland law.
Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (1) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (2) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our charter contains such a provision and limits the liability of our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Maryland law requires us to indemnify our directors and officers for liability actually incurred in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party, except to the extent that the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was either committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services, or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, our charter obligates us to advance the reasonable defense costs incurred by our directors and officers. Finally, we have entered into agreements with our directors and officers pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
U.S. Federal Income and Other Tax Risks
Our failure to remain qualified as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and potentially state and local tax, and would adversely affect our operations and the market price of our capital stock.
We elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and believe we have operated, and intend to operate, in a manner that has allowed us to qualify as a REIT and will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, we may terminate our REIT qualification if the Board of Directors determines that not qualifying as a REIT is in our best interests, or the qualification may be terminated inadvertently. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. We structured our activities in a manner designed to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT. However, the REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and interpretation of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT is limited. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we have been or will be successful in qualifying to be taxed as a REIT. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends on our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the annual income and quarterly asset requirements also depends on our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), such recharacterization would jeopardize our ability to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT. Furthermore, future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could result in our disqualification as a REIT for past or future periods.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT qualification. Losing our REIT qualification would reduce our net earnings because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions and, accordingly, distributions the Operating Partnership makes to its unitholders could be similarly reduced. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.

24

Table of Contents

Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, in certain circumstances, we may incur tax liabilities that would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders.
Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties that are considered held for sale and not for investment (a “prohibited transaction” under the Internal Revenue Code) will be subject to a 100% tax. In addition, we may not make sufficient distributions to avoid income and excise taxes on retained income. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property or other assets and pay U.S. federal income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated for federal income tax purposes as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We may, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax (which could be significant in amount) in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Internal Revenue Code to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS of the REIT. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. We may use TRSs generally to hold properties for sale in the ordinary course of business or to hold assets or conduct activities that we cannot conduct directly as a REIT. Our TRSs will be subject to applicable U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax on their taxable income. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to ensure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. These rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
Not all taxing jurisdictions recognize the favorable tax treatment afforded to REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. As such, we may be subject to regular corporate net income taxes in certain state, local or foreign taxing jurisdictions. In addition, we, the Operating Partnership, our TRSs, and/or other entities through which we conduct our business may also be subject to state, local or foreign income, franchise, sales, transfer, excise or other taxes. Any taxes that we incur directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders. Additionally, changes in state, local or foreign tax law could reduce the cash flow from certain investments made by us and could make such investments less attractive to potential buyers when we seek to liquidate such investments.
To qualify as a REIT we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may force us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities or borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions. This could delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce your overall return.
In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which dividends we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (a) 85% of our ordinary income, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income and (c) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on investments in real estate assets and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, possibly at unfavorable rates, or sell assets to fund these dividends or make taxable stock dividends. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our earnings while we qualify as a REIT, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.
If the Operating Partnership or certain other subsidiaries fail to qualify as a partnership or are not otherwise disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then we would cease to qualify as a REIT.
We intend to maintain the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership for such purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation. This would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT and would cause us to be subject to a corporate-level tax on our income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the yield on your investments. In addition, if one or more of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the Operating Partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership and is otherwise not disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the Operating Partnership. Such a recharacterization of a subsidiary entity could also threaten our ability to maintain our REIT qualification.

25

Table of Contents

Recent legislation substantially modified the taxation of REITs and their shareholders, and the effects of such legislation and related regulatory action are uncertain.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”). The TCJA makes major changes to the Code, including a number of provisions of the Code that affect the taxation of REITs and their stockholders. Among the changes made by the TCJA are permanently reducing the generally applicable corporate tax rate, generally reducing the tax rate applicable to individuals and other non-corporate taxpayers for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, eliminating or modifying certain previously allowed deductions (including substantially limiting interest deductibility and, for individuals, the deduction for non-business state and local taxes), and, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, providing for preferential rates of taxation through a deduction of up to 20% (subject to certain limitations) on most ordinary REIT dividends and certain trade or business income of non-corporate taxpayers. The TCJA also imposes new limitations on the deduction of net operating losses and requires us to recognize income for tax purposes no later than when we take it into account on our financial statements, which may result in us having to make additional taxable distributions to our stockholders in order to comply with REIT distribution requirements or avoid taxes on retained income and gains. The effect of the significant changes made by the TCJA is highly uncertain, and administrative guidance will be required in order to fully evaluate the effect of many provisions. The effect of any technical corrections with respect to the TCJA could have an adverse effect on us or our stockholders. Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the implications of the TCJA on their investment in our capital stock.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
Currently, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 20% (not including the net investment income tax). Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for this reduced rate. Although this does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock. Pursuant to the TCJA, non-corporate recipients of dividends from a REIT (other than capital gains dividends and dividends eligible for treatment as qualified dividends) may deduct up to 20% of such REIT dividends for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026. This deduction mitigates but does not eliminate the difference in effective tax rates between REIT dividends and dividends paid by C corporations.
If we were considered to have actually or constructively paid a “preferential dividend” to certain of our stockholders, our status as a REIT could be adversely affected.
For our taxable years that ended on or before December 31, 2014, and for any year in which we fail to be a “publicly offered” REIT within the meaning of Section 562 of the Code, in order for our distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions could not have been “preferential dividends.” We believe we qualify as a publicly offered REIT, but there can be no assurance that we will continue to so qualify. A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class, and in accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents. There is uncertainty as to the IRS’s position regarding whether certain arrangements that REITs have with their stockholders could give rise to the inadvertent payment of a preferential dividend. While we believe that our operations have been structured in such a manner that we will not be treated as inadvertently paying preferential dividends, there is no de minimis or reasonable cause exception with respect to preferential dividends under the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, if the IRS were to take the position that we inadvertently paid a preferential dividend prior to January 1, 2015 (or any later year in which we are not a publicly offered REIT), we may be deemed either to (a) have distributed less than 100% of our REIT taxable income and be subject to tax on the undistributed portion, or (b) have distributed less than 90% of our REIT taxable income and our status as a REIT could be terminated for the year in which such determination is made and for the four taxable years following the year of termination if we were unable to cure such failure.

26

Table of Contents

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or to offset certain other positions, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such TRS.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to forgo or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and stock of a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and stock of a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by certain debt securities of publicly offered REITs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
Re-characterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.
We may purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. The Internal Revenue Service could challenge our characterization of certain leases in any such sale-leaseback transactions as “true leases,” which allows us to be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that any sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and re-characterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or the “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of re-characterization. Alternatively, such a recharacterization could cause the amount of our REIT taxable income to be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year and thus lose our REIT status.
We may incur adverse tax consequences if ARCT III, CapLease, ARCT IV, Cole or CCPT failed to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
 The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the OP, the General Partner, American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. (“ARCT III”), CapLease, Inc. (“CapLease”), American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., (“ARCT IV”), Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc. (“Cole”) and Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. (“CCPT”) are subject. If any of ARCT III, CapLease, ARCT IV, Cole or CCPT failed to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time prior to such entity’s merger with us, we may inherit significant tax liabilities and could fail to qualify as a REIT.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability, reduce our operating flexibility and reduce the market price of our capital stock.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to qualify as a REIT or the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor

27

Table of Contents

with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares.
Although REITs generally receive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a regular corporation. As a result, our charter provides the Board of Directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. The Board of Directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interest of our stockholders.
Non-U.S. stockholders may be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax and may be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon the disposition of our shares.
Gain recognized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale or exchange of our common stock generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless such stock constitutes a “U.S. real property interest” (“USRPI”) under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (the “FIRPTA”). Our common stock will not constitute a USRPI so long as we are a “domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.” A domestically-controlled qualified investment entity includes a REIT if at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of such REIT’s stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. We believe that we are a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity. However, because our common stock is and will be publicly traded, no assurance can be given that we are or will be a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.
Even if we do not qualify as a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity at the time a non-U.S. stockholder sells or exchanges our common stock, gain arising from such a sale or exchange would not be subject to U.S. taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI if: (a) our common stock is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury regulations, on an established securities market, and (b) such non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually and constructively, 10% or less of our common stock at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale. We anticipate that our shares will be “regularly traded” on an established securities market for the foreseeable future, although, no assurance can be given that this will be the case. We encourage you to consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences applicable to you if you are a non-U.S. stockholder.
Our property taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which would impact our cash flows.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay some state and local taxes on our properties. The real property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase substantially. If the property taxes we pay increase and if any such increase is not reimbursable under the terms of our lease, then our cash flows will be impacted, and our ability to pay expected distributions to our stockholders and unitholders could be adversely affected.
The share ownership restrictions of the Internal Revenue Code for REITs and the 9.8% share ownership limit in our charter may inhibit market activity in our shares of stock and restrict our business combination opportunities.
In order to qualify as a REIT, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, may not own, actually or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding shares of stock at any time during the last half of each taxable year, other than the first year for which a REIT election is made. Attribution rules in the Internal Revenue Code determine if any individual or entity actually or constructively owns our shares of stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our shares of stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year, other than the first year for which a REIT election is made. To help insure that we meet these tests, among other purposes, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of our shares of stock.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT while we so qualify. Unless exempted by the Board of Directors, for so long as we qualify as a REIT, our charter prohibits, among other limitations on ownership and transfer of shares of our stock, any person from beneficially or constructively owning (applying certain attribution rules under the Internal Revenue Code) more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock and more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of our shares of stock. The Board of Directors, in its sole discretion and upon receipt of certain representations and undertakings, may exempt a person (prospectively or retrospectively) from the ownership limits. However, the Board of Directors may not, among other limitations, grant an exemption from these ownership restrictions to any proposed transferee whose ownership, direct or indirect, in excess of the 9.8% ownership limit would result in the termination of our qualification as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions is no longer required in order for us

28

Table of Contents

to continue to so qualify as a REIT. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Our principal corporate offices are located at 2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100, Phoenix, Arizona 85016. We have additional office space in New York, New York; Orlando, Florida; Alpharetta, Georgia; Austin, Texas, Washington, D.C.; Los Angeles, California; and Glenview, Illinois. We lease all of these offices, other than our office space in Glenview, Illinois, which was acquired in 2013. We believe these properties we own and lease are suitable for our operations for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2017 , omitting the Excluded Property, the Company owned 4,091 operating properties comprising 94.4 million square feet of retail and commercial space located in 49 states, Puerto Rico and Canada, which includes properties owned through consolidated joint ventures. The rentable space at these properties was 98.8% leased with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Real Estate Portfolio Metrics for a discussion of the properties we hold for rental operations and Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for a detailed listing of such properties.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The information contained under the heading “Litigation” in “ Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies ” to our consolidated financial statements is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3. Except as set forth therein, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

29

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Effective July 31, 2015, we transferred the listing of the General Partner’s common stock and Series F Preferred Stock to the NYSE from NASDAQ Global Select Market. The General Partner’s common stock and Series F Preferred Stock trade under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively.
Stock Price Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on the General Partner’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts All Equity REITs Index (“FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the period commencing December 31, 2012 and ending December 31, 2017 . The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2012.
CHART-B8799DFE0F8C9781694.JPG
The graph above and the accompanying text are not “soliciting material,” are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. In addition, the stock price performance in the graph above is not indicative of future stock price performance.
Stock Price and Distributions
For each quarter indicated, the following table reflects the respective high and low sales prices for the General Partner’s common stock as quoted by the NYSE, as applicable, and the dividend or distribution declared per share of common stock or OP Unit by the General Partner or the Operating Partnership, respectively, in each such period:
 
 
First Quarter 2016
 
Second Quarter 2016
 
Third Quarter 2016
 
Fourth Quarter 2016
 
First Quarter 2017
 
Second Quarter 2017
 
Third Quarter 2017
 
Fourth Quarter 2017
High
 
$
8.92

 
$
10.14

 
$
11.09

 
$
10.35

 
$
9.12

 
$
8.94

 
$
8.75

 
$
8.57

Low
 
$
6.68

 
$
8.67

 
$
9.76

 
$
7.99

 
$
8.18

 
$
7.44

 
$
7.90

 
$
7.64

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends or distributions declared on common stock or OP Units (1)
 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

 
$
0.1375

_______________________________________________
(1)
The dividend that the General Partner pays on its common stock is equal to the distributions that the Operating Partnership makes on its OP Units pursuant to the terms of the LPA. However, the Operating Partnership did not make distributions in respect of a substantial portion of the outstanding OP Units held by its limited partners beginning on October 15, 2015 and continuing through January 16, 2018 when the dividend on the General Partner’s common stock was paid, as further discussed in “Note 16 - Equity” in our consolidated financial statements.

30

Table of Contents

On February 21, 2018 , the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of  $0.55  per share) for the first quarter of 2018 to stockholders of record as of March 30, 2018, which will be paid on April 16, 2018 . An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP Unit. Our future distributions may vary and will be determined by the General Partner’s Board of Directors based upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results, estimated taxable income and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board.
As of February 20, 2018, the General Partner had approximately 3,700 registered stockholders of record of its common stock. This figure does not reflect the beneficial ownership of shares held in nominee name. There is no established trading market for the Operating Partnership's OP Units. As of February 20, 2018, there were 29 record holders of the OP Units.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company did not redeem any Limited Partner OP Units for shares of the General Partner's common stock.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table shows the amount of securities remaining available for future issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017 :
Plan Category
 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
Securities Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans  (1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 

 

 
91,295,800

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 

 

 

Total
 

 

 
91,295,800

_______________________________________________
(1)
The total number of shares of common stock reserved for the issuance of equity incentive awards under our Equity Plan is equal to 10.0% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock (on a fully diluted basis assuming the redemption of all OP Units for shares of common stock) at any time.  As such, the number of shares available for issuance under the Equity Plan changes automatically with changes in the total number of outstanding shares of common stock, outstanding OP Units, and dilutive securities. See “ Note 16 – Equity-based Compensation to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company’s equity plans.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
We are authorized to repurchase shares of the General Partner’s common stock to satisfy employee withholding tax obligations related to stock-based compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the General Partner and the Operating Partnership repurchased the following shares of common stock and corresponding OP Units that were issued to the General Partner, respectively, in order to satisfy the minimum tax withholding obligation for state and federal payroll taxes on employee stock awards:
Period
 
Total Number of Shares/ Units Purchased
 
Weighted Average Price Paid Per Share/Unit
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
 
October 1, 2017 - October 31, 2017
 
26,462

 
8.41

(1)  

 

 
November 1, 2017 - November 30, 2017
 
413

 
8.07

(1)  

 

 
December 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017
 
6,752

 
7.79

(1)  

 

 
Total
 
33,627

 
$
8.28

 


$

 
_________________________________________
(1)
With respect to these shares/units, the price paid per share/unit is based on the weighted average closing price on the respective vesting date.



31

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current presentation, as discussed in “ Note 2 –     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” to our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) presented below was derived from our consolidated financial statements:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014  (1)
 
2013 (1)
Balance sheet data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total real estate investments, at cost
 
$
15,615,375

 
$
15,584,442

 
$
16,784,721

 
$
18,292,560

 
$
7,459,142

Total assets
 
$
14,705,578

 
$
15,587,574

 
$
17,405,866

 
$
20,427,136

 
$
7,747,494

Total debt, net
 
$
6,073,444

 
$
6,367,248

 
$
8,059,802

 
$
10,425,778

 
$
4,286,619

Total liabilities
 
$
6,662,702

 
$
6,968,041

 
$
8,691,907

 
$
11,044,806

 
$
5,248,967

Temporary equity
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
269,299

Total equity
 
$
8,042,876

 
$
8,619,533

 
$
8,713,959

 
$
9,382,330

 
$
2,229,228

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014 (1)
 
2013 (1)
Operating data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
 
$
1,252,285

 
$
1,335,447

 
$
1,441,135

 
$
1,375,699

 
$
329,323

Impairments
 
50,548

 
182,820

 
91,755

 
100,547

 
3,346

Total other operating expenses
 
945,484

 
963,598

 
1,059,590

 
1,315,951

 
659,721

Operating income (loss)
 
256,253

 
189,029

 
289,790

 
(40,799
)
 
(333,744
)
Total other expenses, net
 
(259,412
)
 
(304,304
)
 
(351,882
)
 
(398,947
)
 
(171,876
)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
61,536

 
45,524

 
(72,311
)
 
(277,031
)
 

Provision for income taxes
 
(6,882
)
 
(7,136
)
 
(4,589
)
 
(7,313
)
 
(2,195
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
51,495

 
(76,887
)
 
(138,992
)
 
(724,090
)
 
(507,815
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
 
(286,822
)
 

Net income (loss)
 
32,378

 
(200,824
)
 
(323,492
)
 
(1,010,912
)
 
(507,815
)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (2)
 
(560
)
 
4,961

 
7,139

 
33,727

 
16,316

Net income (loss) attributable to General Partner
 
$
31,818

 
$
(195,863
)
 
$
(316,353
)
 
$
(977,185
)
 
$
(491,499
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flow data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
 
$
793,267

 
$
797,948

 
$
859,695

 
$
502,887

 
$
11,918

Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
 
$
(274,106
)
 
$
881,637

 
$
941,417

 
$
(2,527,726
)
 
$
(4,541,718
)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
 
$
(756,595
)
 
$
(1,506,985
)
 
$
(2,151,604
)
 
$
2,415,555

 
$
4,295,604

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.23
)
 
$
(1.01
)
 
$
(2.41
)
Basic and diluted net loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders
 
(0.02
)
 
(0.13
)
 
(0.20
)
 
(0.35
)
 

Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.29
)
 
$
(0.43
)
 
$
(1.36
)
 
$
(2.41
)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding - basic (3)
 
974,098,652

 
931,422,844

 
903,360,763

 
793,150,098

 
205,341,431

Cash dividends declared per common share
 
$
0.55

 
$
0.55

 
$
0.28

 
$
1.08

 
$
0.91

_______________________________________________
(1)
The Company’s operations were impacted by significant mergers with real estate businesses during these periods.
(2)
Represents income or loss attributable to limited partners and consolidated joint venture partners.
(3)
For all periods presented, the effect of certain OP Units outstanding, long-term incentive plan units of the Operating Partnership (“LTIP Units”), unvested restricted shares or units and convertible preferred shares were excluded from the weighted-average share calculation as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

32

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations .
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this report entitled “ Forward-Looking Statements .” Certain risks may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section in this report entitled “ Risk Factors .”
Overview
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. The Company has 4,091 retail, restaurant, office and industrial operating properties with an aggregate 94.4 million square feet, of which 98.8% was leased as of December 31, 2017 , with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, we operated through two business segments, our real estate investment segment and our investment management segment, Cole Capital, which sponsored and managed non-listed real estate investment trusts. On November 13, 2017, we entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented. See Note 5 — Discontinued Operations , for further information on the sale of Cole Capital.
Effective January 1, 2017, we determined that adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”), a non-GAAP measure, and our real estate portfolio and economic metrics, should exclude the impact of properties owned by the Company for the month beginning with the date that (i) the properties’ related mortgage loan is in default and (ii) management decides to transfer the properties to the lender in connection with settling the mortgage note obligation, and ending with the disposition date ("Excluded Properties"), to better reflect our ongoing operations. Excluded Properties during the year ended December 31, 2017 , were two vacant office properties and five industrial properties, two of which were vacant. Excluded Properties at December 31, 2017 , included one vacant industrial property, comprised of 307,275 square feet, which secured a mortgage note payable, with debt outstanding of $16.2 million . The Company did not update data presented for prior periods for this change as it determined the impact on our prior periods was immaterial.
Our Business Environment and Current Outlook
Current conditions in the global capital markets remain volatile as the world’s economic growth has been affected by geopolitical and economic events. In the United States, the overall economic environment continued to improve in 2017. During 2017, the U.S. real gross domestic product increased 2.3%, the unemployment rate decreased 0.6 percentage points to 4.1%, and Core CPI, a measure of inflation which removes food & energy prices and is seasonally adjusted, increased 1.8%, as compared to the same period a year earlier.
Economic trends and government policies affect global and regional commercial real estate markets as well as our operations directly. These include: overall economic activity and employment growth, interest rate levels, the cost and availability of credit and the impact of tax and regulatory policies.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management believes that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner and in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to the various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different assumptions or estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. We believe the following critical accounting policies govern the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements, which should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies and procedures included in “ Note 2 –   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” to our consolidated financial statements.

33

Table of Contents

Goodwill Impairment
We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Others (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test (comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill). The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to goodwill impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:
We estimate the fair value using discounted cash flows and relevant competitor multiples.
We monitor factors that may impact the fair value including market comparable company multiples, interest rates and global economic conditions.
We use a combined income and market approach in evaluations for potential impairment, which requires management to make key assumptions related to revenue growth rate, cash flow assumptions, discount rate and selection of comparable companies.
See “ Note 9 – Fair Value Measures for discussion regarding our sensitivity analysis performed around these assumptions.
Real Estate Investment Impairment
We invest in real estate assets and subsequently monitor those investments quarterly for impairment, including the review of real estate properties subject to direct financing leases. Additionally, we record depreciation and amortization related to our investments. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to real estate investments include, but are not limited to, the following:
The estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets affect the amount of depreciation and amortization recognized on our investments.
The review of impairment indicators and subsequent determination of the undiscounted future cash flows could require us to reduce the value of assets and recognize an impairment loss.
The fair value of held for sale assets is estimated by management. This estimated value could result in a reduction of the carrying value of the asset.
Changes in assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial results.
Loans Held for Investment Impairment
We evaluate loans held for investment on a quarterly basis. As a first step in the notes receivable impairment process, we must determine, based on current information and events, if it is probable that we will be unable to collect the amounts due in accordance with the loan agreement. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to notes receivable include, but are not limited to, the following:
Evaluating the financial condition and other current obligations of the borrower involves judgment in assessing their liquidity and financial stability.
Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
In connection with our acquisition of properties, we allocate the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities acquired based on their respective estimated fair values. Tangible assets consist of land, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements. Intangible assets consist of above- and below- market lease values and the value of in-place leases. Our purchase price allocations are developed utilizing third-party appraisal reports, industry standards and management experience. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to purchase price allocations include, but are not limited to, the following:
The value allocated to land as opposed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements affects the amount of depreciation expense we record. If more value is attributed to land, depreciation expense is lower than if more value is attributed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements;
Intangible lease assets and liabilities can be significantly affected by estimates, including market rent, lease term including renewal options at rental rates below estimated market rental rates, carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, and current market conditions and costs, including tenant improvement allowances and rent concessions; and
We determine whether any financing assumed is above- or below- market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar investment properties.

34

Table of Contents

Income Taxes
As a REIT, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its shareholders as long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains), with the exception of its TRS entities. However, the General Partner, including its TRS entities, and the Operating Partnership are still subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate.
We provide for income taxes in accordance with current authoritative accounting and tax guidance. The tax provision or benefit related to significant or unusual items is recognized in the quarter in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the quarter in which the change occurs. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to income taxes include, but are not limited to, the following:
Our calculations related to income taxes contain uncertainties due to judgment used to calculate tax liabilities in the application of complex tax laws and regulations across the tax jurisdictions where we operate;
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Canadian federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions, and are subject to routine examinations by the respective tax authorities. We may be challenged upon review by the applicable taxing authorities, and positions we have taken may not be sustained; and
The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for or benefit from income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently issued accounting pronouncements are described in “ Note 2 –   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements.
Operating Highlights and Key Performance Indicators
2017 Activity
Acquired controlling financial interests in 88 commercial properties and three land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million , which includes $3.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized and 22 properties acquired in a nonmonetary exchange.
Disposed of 137 properties, including six properties relinquished by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions, for an aggregate sales price of $594.9 million , of which our share was $574.4 million , resulting in consolidated proceeds of $445.5 million after a mortgage loan assumption and closing costs, including 15 properties disposed of in connection with a nonmonetary exchange.
Total secured debt decreased by $579.9 million , from $2.7 billion to $2.1 billion .
Closed 2017 Bond Offering of $600.0 million and repaid all of the outstanding borrowings under our $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan.
Declared a quarterly dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stock for each quarter of 2017, representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share.
Entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of Cole Capital.

35

Table of Contents

Real Estate Portfolio Metrics
In managing our portfolio, we are committed to diversification by property type, tenant, geography and industry. Below is a summary of our operating property type diversification and our top ten concentrations as of December 31, 2017 , based on annualized rental income of $1.2 billion ,
CHART-3CE86CC597EF534DA6C.JPG
CHART-E90B88D1670756BCBA5.JPG CHART-32200DF5C0855E1EA47.JPG
CHART-14DD16B4D26E5C0DAB4.JPG CHART-891C6E4B25655D5883A.JPG

36

Table of Contents

Our financial performance is influenced by the timing of acquisitions and dispositions and the operating performance of our real estate properties. The following table shows the property statistics of our operating properties, excluding properties owned through our unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 :
 
 
2017  (1)
 
2016
 
2015
Portfolio Metrics
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating properties
 
4,091
 
4,142
 
4,435
Rentable square feet (in millions)
 
94.4
 
93.3
 
99.6
Economic occupancy rate (2)
 
98.8%
 
98.3%
 
98.6%
Investment-grade tenants  (3)
 
39.6%
 
41.2%
 
42.5%
____________________________________
(1)
Omits the impact, if any, of the Excluded Properties.
(2)
Economic occupancy rate equals the sum of square feet leased (including space subject to month-to-month agreements) divided by total square feet.
(3)
Investment-grade tenants are those with a credit rating of BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or a credit rating of Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. The ratings may reflect those assigned by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. to the lease guarantor or the parent company, as applicable.
The following table shows the economic metrics of our operating properties, excluding properties owned through our unconsolidated joint ventures, as of December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 :
 
 
2017 (1)
 
2016
 
2015
Economic Metrics
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average lease term (in years) (2)
 
9.5
 
9.9
 
10.6
Lease rollover (2)(3) :
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annual average
 
4.8%
 
4.3%
 
3.8%
Maximum for a single year
 
7.3%
 
7.4%
 
4.5%
____________________________________
(1)
Omits the impact, if any, of the Excluded Properties.
(2)
Based on annualized rental income of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2017 .
(3)
Through the end of the next five years as of the respective reporting date.

37

Table of Contents

Operating Performance
In addition, management uses the following financial metrics to assess our operating performance (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts). Data presented includes both continuing operations, which primarily represent the Company's real estate operations, and discontinued operations, which represent substantially all of Cole Capital, except as otherwise indicated.
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Financial Metrics
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues  (1)

$
1,252,285

 
$
1,335,447

 
$
1,441,135

Operating income  (1)

$
256,253

 
$
189,029

 
$
289,790

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
51,495

 
$
(76,887
)
 
$
(138,992
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
$
(19,117
)
 
$
(123,937
)
 
$
(184,500
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders per diluted share (2)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.23
)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders per diluted share (2)
 
(0.02
)
 
(0.13
)
 
(0.20
)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per diluted share (2)
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.29
)
 
$
(0.43
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from continuing operations (3)
 
$
672,225

 
$
737,353

 
$
769,666

FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from discontinued operations (3)
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners (3)

$
653,108

 
$
613,416

 
$
585,166

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from continuing operations (3)
 
$
702,556

 
$
723,354

 
$
770,567

AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from discontinued operations (3)
 
36,213

 
18,103

 
11,491

AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners (3)

$
738,769

 
$
741,457

 
$
782,058

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from continuing operations per diluted share (3)
 
$
0.70

 
$
0.76

 
$
0.83

AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from discontinued operations per diluted share (3)
 
0.04

 
0.02

 
0.01

AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners per diluted share (3)
 
$
0.74

 
$
0.78

 
$
0.84

____________________________________
(1)
Represents continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP.
(2)
See “Note 18 – Net Income (Loss) Per Share/Unit” for calculation of net income (loss) per share.
(3)
See the “ Non-GAAP Measures ” section below for descriptions of our non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure.


38

Table of Contents

Property Financing
Our mortgage notes payable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Encumbered Properties
 
Outstanding Loan Amount
 
Weighted Average
Effective Interest Rate
(1)(2)
 
Weighted Average Maturity (3)
December 31, 2017 (4)
 
471

 
$
2,054,838

 
4.88
%
 
4.1

December 31, 2016
 
619

 
$
2,629,949

 
4.95
%
 
4.6

December 31, 2015
 
654

 
$
3,039,882

 
5.08
%
 
5.1

_______________________________________________
(1)
Mortgage notes payable have fixed rates or are fixed by way of interest rate swap arrangements. Effective interest rates ranged from 3.1% to 7.2% at December 31, 2017 , 2.00% to 7.75% at December 31, 2016, and 3.10% to 10.68% at December 31, 2015.
(2)
Weighted average interest rate is computed using the interest rate in effect until the anticipated repayment date. Should the loan not be repaid at the anticipated repayment date, the applicable interest rate would increase as specified in the respective loan agreement until the extended maturity date.
(3)
Weighted average years remaining to maturity is computed using the anticipated repayment date as specified in each loan agreement, where applicable.
(4)
Omits the Excluded Property and the related outstanding loan amount of $16.2 million and interest rate of 9.48% .

In addition, we have financing which is not secured by interests in real property, which is described under “ Liquidity and Capital Resources .”
Future Lease Expirations
The following is a summary of lease expirations for the next 10 years and beyond at the operating properties we owned as of  December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts and square feet in thousands):
Year of Expiration
 
Number of Leases
Expiring
(1)
 
Square Feet
 
Square Feet as a % of Total Portfolio
 
Annualized Rental Income Expiring
 
Annualized Rental Income Expiring as a % of Total Portfolio
2018
 
150

 
2,173

 
2.3
%
 
$
26,924

 
2.3
%
2019
 
171

 
2,769

 
2.9
%
 
45,237

 
3.9
%
2020
 
218

 
3,935

 
4.2
%
 
42,621

 
3.7
%
2021
 
188

 
10,523

 
11.1
%
 
84,081

 
7.3
%
2022
 
287

 
9,380

 
9.9
%
 
80,416

 
7.0
%
2023
 
247

 
6,036

 
6.4
%
 
75,240

 
6.5
%
2024
 
174

 
9,060

 
9.6
%
 
105,547

 
9.1
%
2025
 
266

 
4,197

 
4.4
%
 
60,209

 
5.2
%
2026
 
248

 
8,779

 
9.3
%
 
84,535

 
7.3
%
2027
 
367

 
7,661

 
8.1
%
 
103,552

 
9.0
%
Thereafter
 
1,009

 
28,812

 
30.6
%
 
446,194

 
38.7
%
Total
 
3,325

 
93,325

 
98.8
%
 
$
1,154,556

 
100.0
%
_______________________________________________
(1)
The Company has certain leases comprised of multiple properties.

39

Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented. The Company's continuing operations represent primarily those of the real estate investment segment.
Rental Income
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, rental income information and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 
2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Rental income
 
$
1,154,147

 
$
1,229,992

 
$
1,342,507

 
$
(75,845
)
 
$
(112,515
)

2017 vs 2016 – The decrease in rental income of $75.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to the disposition of 438 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – Rental revenue decreased $112.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 , of which $105.6 million was due to the disposition of 529 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2015. The decrease was also due to an increase in tenant vacancies, particularly Ovation Brands, Inc., which filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 7, 2016 (the “Ovation Bankruptcy”).
Operating Expenses
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, certain operating expense information and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 
2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Acquisition-related
 
$
3,402

 
$
1,321

 
$
6,243

 
$
2,081

 
$
(4,922
)
Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries
 
47,960

 
3,884

 
33,628

 
44,076

 
(29,744
)
Property operating
 
128,717

 
144,428

 
130,855

 
(15,711
)
 
13,573

General and administrative
 
58,603

 
51,927

 
67,137

 
6,676

 
(15,210
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
706,802

 
762,038

 
821,727

 
(55,236
)
 
(59,689
)
Impairments
 
50,548


182,820

 
91,755

 
(132,272
)
 
91,065

Total operating expenses
 
$
996,032

 
$
1,146,418

 
$
1,151,345

 
$
(150,386
)
 
$
(4,927
)
Acquisition-Related Expenses
Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 as discussed in “ Note 2 –   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” to our consolidated financial statements, acquisition-related expenses consist primarily of internal salaries allocated to acquisition-related activities and costs incurred for deals that were not consummated.
2017 vs 2016 - The increase of $2.1 million in acquisition-related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 , as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to an increase in allocated internal salaries resulting from time spent on acquiring commercial properties during the year ended December 31, 2017 . The Company resumed property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2016 and acquired 88 properties and three land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 .
2016 vs 2015 - The Company acquired an interest in eight commercial properties for a purchase price of $100.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared with the acquisition of 16 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $36.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 . The decrease in acquisition related expenses of $4.9 million during the year

40


ended December 31, 2016 was due to a decrease in costs incurred for deals that were not consummated and fewer properties acquired in 2016 .
Litigation, Merger and Other Non-routine Costs, Net of Insurance Recoveries
2017 vs 2016 - The increase  of $44.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was due to an increase of $25.2 million in legal fees incurred related to the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation and investigations during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 . Additionally, the Company recognized $21.2 million of insurance recoveries during the year ended December 31, 2016 , of which $10.5 million related to litigation resulting from prior mergers and $10.7 million related to the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation and investigations. No insurance recoveries were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the litigation resulting from prior mergers.
2016 vs 2015 - The decrease of $29.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to a $20 million decrease in legal fees incurred for litigation arising from the results of the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation and investigations. Additionally, the Company recognized insurance recoveries of $21.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $11.4 million in 2015.
Property Operating Expenses and Operating Expense Reimbursements
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, the property operating expenses, net of operating expense reimbursements, and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 
2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Property operating expenses
 
$
128,717

 
$
144,428

 
$
130,855

 
$
(15,711
)
 
$
13,573

Less: Operating expense reimbursements
 
98,138

 
105,455

 
98,628

 
(7,317
)
 
6,827

Property operating expenses, net of operating expense reimbursements
 
$
30,579


$
38,973

 
$
32,227

 
$
(8,394
)
 
$
6,746

2017 vs 2016  – Property operating expenses such as taxes, insurance, ground rent and maintenance include both reimbursable and non-reimbursable property expenses. Operating expense reimbursement revenue represents reimbursements for such costs that are reimbursable by the tenants per their respective leases. The decrease in net property operating expenses of $8.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to the disposition of vacant properties and certain properties subject to double-net or modified gross leases.
2016 vs 2015  – The net increase of $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to an increase in tenant vacancies, particularly related to Ovation Brands, Inc., which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 7, 2016.
General and Administrative Expenses
2017 vs 2016  – The increase of $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to an increase of $6.8 million of compensation and benefits, including equity based compensation.
2016 vs 2015  – The decrease of $15.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to a decrease of $8.2 million in consulting and other professional fees in 2016. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2016 , accounting fees decreased $2.1 million, primarily due to the work performed during the first quarter of 2015 in connection with the restatements, and legal fees decreased $2.7 million, primarily due to costs incurred in 2015 related to strategic, tax and regulatory matters.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
2017 vs 2016  – The decrease of $55.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to the disposition of 438 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016. The Company also recorded  $50.5 million and $182.8 million of impairment charges on real estate investments during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, which reduced the carrying value being depreciated and amortized.
2016 vs 2015  – The decrease of $59.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily related to the disposition of 529 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2015. The Company also recorded  $182.8 million and $91.8 million of impairment charges on real estate investments during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which reduced the carrying value being depreciated and amortized.

41


Impairments
2017 vs 2016  – The decrease in impairments of $132.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to a decrease in the number of properties impaired from 153 during the year ended December 31, 2016 to 69 properties during the year ended December 31, 2017 . In addition, the decrease was also due to management identifying certain properties for potential sale as part of its portfolio management strategy to reduce exposure to office properties during the year ended December 31, 2016 as well as the Ovation Bankruptcy during 2016.
2016 vs 2015  – The increase in impairments of $91.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to management identifying certain properties for potential sale as part of its portfolio management strategy to reduce exposure to office properties, as well as the Ovation Bankruptcy.
Other (Expense) Income, Income Tax (Provision) Benefit and Loss from Discontinued Operations
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, certain financial information and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 
2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Interest expense
 
$
(289,766
)
 
$
(317,376
)
 
$
(358,392
)
 
$
(27,610
)
 
$
(41,016
)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net
 
18,373

 
(771
)
 
4,812

 
19,144

 
(5,583
)
Other income, net
 
6,242

 
5,251

 
9,366

 
991

 
(4,115
)
Reserve for loan loss
 

 

 
(15,300
)
 

 
15,300

Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities
 
2,763

 
9,783

 
9,092

 
(7,020
)
 
691

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net
 
2,976

 
(1,191
)
 
(1,460
)
 
4,167

 
269

Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
61,536

 
45,524

 
(72,311
)
 
16,012

 
117,835

Provision for income taxes
 
(6,882
)
 
(7,136
)
 
(4,589
)
 
(254
)
 
2,547

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
 
104,820

 
60,563

Interest Expense
2017 vs 2016  – The decrease of $27.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily due to the repayment of the Credit Facility Term Loan of $500.0 million and a $579.9 million reduction of secured debt, partially offset by the issuance of $600.0 million of unsecured notes and net borrowings on the revolving credit facility of $185.0 million .
2016 vs 2015  – The decrease of $41.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily a result of a decrease in the total outstanding debt balance from $8.1 billion as of December 31, 2015 to $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2016 , largely due to the repayment of all outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, repayment of $0.5 billion of the Credit Facility Term Loan, as well as reducing secured debt with proceeds from the public equity offering and property dispositions.
Gain (Loss) on Extinguishment and Forgiveness of Debt, Net
2017 vs 2016  – The increase of $19.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily a result of three mortgage loans settled by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure for which the Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of $20.5 million, with no comparable gains resulting from foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure during the same period in 2016 .
2016 vs 2015  – During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded a loss of $0.8 million in relation to the write-off of deferred financing costs and net premiums consisting of losses relating to the early extinguishment of our 2017 Senior Notes of $13.2 million and the prepayment of a portion of the Credit Facility Term Loan of $4.3 million, as well as the 2016 Term Loan of $2.6 million, as discussed in “Note 10 – Debt” to our consolidated financial statements. These losses were partially offset by a gain on forgiveness of debt of $19.1 million related to a mortgage loan settled by foreclosure. During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company recorded a gain on forgiveness of debt of $4.8 million related to the foreclosure of one property.

42


Other Income, Net
2017 vs 2016  – The increase of $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to post-closing adjustments, of $1.6 million, recorded in accordance with the purchase and sale agreement during the year ended December 31, 2016 related to a multi-tenant asset portfolio sale completed in 2014, offset by a decrease in interest income related to the Company’s investment securities and mortgage notes receivable of $0.6 million.
2016 vs 2015  – The decrease of $4.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 was primarily a result of a decrease in disposition fees earned from 1031 real estate programs of $3.8 million.
Reserve for Loan Loss
The reserve for loan loss of $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to an unsecured note from RCS Capital Corporation in connection with the unconsummated sale of Cole Capital. During the three months ended December 31, 2015 , the Company assessed the collectability of the note, determined it was unlikely to be repaid and recorded the reserve equal to the carrying value of the note.
Equity in Income and Gain on Disposition of Unconsolidated Entities
2017 vs 2016  – The decrease of $7.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily the result of a gain of $10.2 million recognized on the disposition of one unconsolidated joint venture owning one property in 2016, with no comparable gain in 2017 .
2016 vs 2015  – Equity in income (loss) and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities increased $0.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 . During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded a gain of $10.2 million related to the disposition of one property, comprising 343 million square feet of office space, owned by an unconsolidated joint venture. During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company recorded a gain of $6.7 million related to the disposition of its interest in one consolidated joint venture, whose only assets consisted of investments in  three  unconsolidated joint ventures that owned three properties, comprising 752 million square feet of retail space. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recognized $0.9 million and $2.3 million of net income, respectively, from the unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company recorded equity in loss related to its investments in the Cole REITs of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 , as compared to equity in income of $0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 .
Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments, Net
2017 vs 2016  – The $4.2 million increase during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 , was primarily a result of the termination of six interest rate swaps in connection with the early repayment of the outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility Term Loan, as discussed in Note 11 –   Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements, which resulted in a gain of $1.1 million as compared to a loss of $3.3 million in 2016 .
2016 vs 2015  – The decrease during the year ended December 31, 2016 , is due to the termination of two interest rate swaps in connection with the early repayment of a portion of the Credit Facility Term Loan, which resulted in a loss of $3.3 million, offset by an increase in the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps.
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Assets Held For Sale, Net
2017 vs 2016  – The increase in gain on disposition of real estate and held for sale assets, net of $16.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 , was due to the Company’s disposition of 131 properties, excluding six properties transferred to the lender in either a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction, for an aggregate sales price of $594.9 million which resulted in a gain of $64.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 , as compared to the disposal of 301 properties for an aggregate sales price of $1.1 billion during the same period in 2016 for a gain of $50.6 million , which included $28.8 million of goodwill allocation related to the sales. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company also recognized a loss of $3.1 million related to assets classified as held for sale, as compared to a loss of $5.1 million during the same period in 2016 .
2016 vs 2015  – During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the change of $117.8 million from a net loss on dispositions of real estate to a net gain was due to the Company’s disposition of 301 properties for an aggregate sales price of $1.1 billion , which resulted in an aggregate gain of $50.6 million , as compared to the disposal of 228 properties for an aggregate sales price of $1.4 billion during the same period in 2015 for a loss of $69.1 million . During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company also recorded a loss of $5.1 million related to assets classified as held for sale, as compared to a loss of $3.2 million during the same period in 2015.

43


Provision for Income Taxes
2017 vs 2016  – The consolidated provision for income taxes of $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to a provision of $7.1 million for the same period in 2016 reflects an overall decrease in expense attributable to higher state taxes in 2016 and tax on net income from properties held in and sold by a TRS in 2016, which were partially offset by tax on the gain on the sale of certain Canadian properties in 2017.
2016 vs 2015  – The increase of $2.5 million is primarily due to the 2014 accrued state tax expense exceeding actual expenses incurred, resulting in a decrease to the provision for income taxes during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
2017 vs 2016  – During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The decrease in loss from discontinued operations of $104.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily due to decreases in impairment of goodwill of $120.9 million, in general and administrative expenses of $18.8 million and in amortization of intangible assets of $11.7 million , partially offset by the loss recognized on classification as held for sale of $20.0 million and an increase in the provision for income taxes of $24.7 million . Revenues, net of reallowed fees and commissions increased $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 , as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 .
2016 vs 2015  – The decrease in loss from discontinued operations of $60.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to a decrease in impairment of intangible assets and goodwill of $92.4 million, offset by a decrease in the benefit from income taxes.

44


Non-GAAP Measures
Our results are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We also disclose certain non-GAAP measures, as discussed further below. M anagement uses these non-GAAP financial measures in our internal analysis of results and believes these measures are useful to investors for the reasons explained below. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as substitutes for any measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”), an industry trade group, has promulgated a supplemental performance measure known as funds from operations (“FFO”), which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. FFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under U.S. GAAP.
NAREIT defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains or losses from disposition of property, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and impairment write-downs on depreciable real estate including the pro rata share of adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We calculated FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition described above.
In addition to FFO, we use adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”) as a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure to evaluate the operating performance of the Company. AFFO, as defined by the Company, excludes from FFO non-routine items such as acquisition-related expenses, litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries, held for sale loss on discontinued operations, gains or losses on sale of investment securities or mortgage notes receivable and legal settlements and insurance recoveries not in the ordinary course of business. We also exclude certain non-cash items such as impairments of goodwill and intangible assets, straight-line rent, net of bad debt expense related to straight-line rent, net direct financing lease adjustments, gains or losses on derivatives, reserves for loan loss, gains or losses on the extinguishment or forgiveness of debt, non-current portion of the tax benefit or expense, equity-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets, deferred financing costs, premiums and discounts on debt and investments, above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities. Effective January 1, 2017, we determined to omit the impact of the Excluded Properties and related non-recourse mortgage notes from FFO to calculate AFFO. We did not adjust AFFO during the years prior to January 1, 2017 as the impact was immaterial. Management believes that excluding these costs from FFO provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance models and analysis used by management, and provides investors a view of the performance of our portfolio over time. AFFO allows for a comparison of the performance of our operations with other publicly-traded REITs, as AFFO, or an equivalent measure, is routinely reported by publicly-traded REITs, and we believe often used by analysts and investors for comparison purposes.
For all of these reasons, we believe FFO and AFFO, in addition to net income (loss), as defined by U.S. GAAP, are helpful supplemental performance measures and useful in understanding the various ways in which our management evaluates the performance of the Company over time. However, not all REITs calculate FFO and AFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. FFO and AFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) and are not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs. Neither the SEC, NAREIT, nor any other regulatory body has evaluated the acceptability of the exclusions used to adjust FFO in order to calculate AFFO and its use as a non-GAAP financial performance measure.

45


The table below presents FFO and AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except share and per share data) and includes both continuing operations, which primarily represent the Company's real estate operations, and discontinued operations, which represent substantially all of Cole Capital.
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss)
 
$
32,378

 
$
(200,824
)
 
$
(323,492
)
Dividends on non-convertible preferred stock
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
(Gain) loss on disposition of real estate assets and interests in unconsolidated joint ventures, net
 
(61,536
)
 
(55,722
)
 
65,582

Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets
 
703,133

 
756,315

 
817,469

Impairment of real estate
 
50,548

 
182,820

 
91,755

Proportionate share of adjustments for unconsolidated entities
 
477

 
2,719

 
5,744

FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners
 
653,108

 
613,416

 
585,166

Acquisition-related expenses
 
3,402

 
1,321

 
6,243

Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries
 
51,762

 
3,884

 
33,628

Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
 

 
120,931

 
213,339

Held for sale loss on discontinued operations
 
20,027

 

 

Reserve for loan loss
 

 

 
15,300

Legal settlements
 

 

 
(1,250
)
Gain on early repayment of mortgage notes receivable and sale of investment securities
 
(65
)
 

 
(65
)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net
 
(2,976
)
 
1,191

 
1,460

Amortization of premiums and discounts on debt and investments, net
 
(4,616
)
 
(14,693
)
 
(19,183
)
Amortization of above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of amortization of below-market lease liabilities
 
5,366

 
5,396

 
4,522

Net direct financing lease adjustments
 
2,093

 
2,264

 
2,037

Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs
 
24,536

 
28,063

 
33,998

Amortization of management contracts
 
14,514

 
26,171

 
25,903

Deferred and other tax expense (benefit) (1)
 
8,671

 
(10,136
)
 
(52,242
)
(Gain) loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net
 
(18,373
)
 
771

 
(4,812
)
Straight-line rent, net of bad debt expense related to straight-line rent
 
(44,903
)
 
(54,190
)
 
(82,398
)
Equity-based compensation
 
16,751

 
10,728

 
14,500

Other amortization and non-cash charges
 
2,566

 
5,296

 
3,840

Proportionate share of adjustments for unconsolidated entities
 
378

 
1,044

 
2,072

Adjustments for Excluded Properties
 
6,528

 

 

AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners
 
$
738,769

 
$
741,457

 
$
782,058

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - basic
 
974,098,652

 
931,422,844

 
903,360,763

Effect of Limited Partner OP Units and dilutive securities (2)
 
24,059,312

 
24,626,646

 
26,013,303

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - diluted (3)
 
998,157,964

 
956,049,490

 
929,374,066

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners per diluted share  
 
$
0.74


$
0.78

 
$
0.84

____________________________________
(1)
This adjustment represents the non-current portion of the provision for or benefit from income taxes in order to show only the current portion of the provision for or benefit from income taxes as an impact to AFFO.  For the three months ended December 31, 2017, this adjustment is net of a current tax benefit due to the acceleration of a bonus compensation-related deduction to take advantage of the Company’s higher effective tax rate in 2017. As the Company already recognized the prior year bonus compensation-related tax deduction during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the acceleration of the 2018 benefit was not included in the computation of AFFO.
(2)
Dilutive securities include unvested restricted shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock units.
(3)
Weighted-average shares for all periods presented exclude the effect of the convertible debt as the Company would expect to settle the debt with cash.

46


Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our principal liquidity needs for the next twelve months and beyond are to:
fund normal operating expenses;
fund capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing costs
meet debt service and principal repayment obligations, including balloon payments on maturing debt;
pay dividends;
pay litigation costs and expenses; and
fund property and/or common stock acquisitions.
We expect to be able to satisfy these obligations using one or more of the following sources:
cash flow from operations;
proceeds from real estate dispositions;
utilization of existing line of credit;
cash and cash equivalents balance; and
issuance of VEREIT debt and equity securities.
2017 Bond Offering
On August 11, 2017, the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 3.950% Senior Notes due 2027 . As discussed in Note 10 – Debt , the Company subsequently used a portion of the proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering to repay borrowings, including swap termination costs and accrued unpaid interest under its $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan on August 11, 2017. The Company used the remaining proceeds to pay down secured debt.
Continuous Equity Offering Program
On September 19, 2016, the Company registered a continuous equity offering program (the “Program”) pursuant to which the Company can offer and sell, from time to time through September 19, 2019 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions, shares of common stock with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $750.0 million, through its sales agents. The Company intends to use the proceeds from any sale of shares for general corporate purposes, which may include funding potential acquisitions and repurchasing or repaying outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2017 , no shares of common stock have been issued pursuant to the Program.
Share Repurchase Program
On May 12, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock over the subsequent 12 months, as market conditions warrant. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 , the Company repurchased 68,759 shares of common stock in multiple open transactions for $0.5 million .
Disposition Activity
As part of our effort to optimize our real estate portfolio by focusing on holding core assets, during the year ended December 31, 2017 , we disposed of 137 properties and six properties transferred to the lender in either a deed-in-lieu foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction for an aggregate sales price of $594.9 million , of which our share was $574.4 million , resulting in consolidated proceeds of $445.5 million after mortgage loan assumption and closing costs. We expect to continue to explore opportunities to sell additional properties to provide us further financial flexibility and fund property acquisitions.
Credit Facility
Summary and Obligations
We, as guarantor, and the Operating Partnership, as borrower, are parties to the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto.

47


As of December 31, 2017 , the Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $185.0 million and allowed for maximum borrowings of $2.3 billion under its revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing availability. The maximum aggregate dollar amount of letters of credit that may be outstanding at any one time under the Credit Facility is $25.0 million . The Operating Partnership used a portion of the proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering to repay all of the outstanding borrowings, including swap termination costs and accrued and unpaid interest, under its $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan on August 11, 2017.
The revolving credit facility generally bears interest at an annual rate of London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.00% to 1.80% or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.80%  (based upon our then current credit rating). “Base Rate” is defined as the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or a floating rate based on one month LIBOR, determined on a daily basis. In addition, the Credit Agreement provides the flexibility for interest rate auctions, pursuant to which, at the Company’s election, the Company may request that lenders make competitive bids to provide revolving loans, which competitive bids may be at pricing levels that differ from the foregoing interest rates.
The Credit Agreement provides for monthly interest payments under the Credit Facility. In the event of default, at the election of a majority of the lenders (or automatically upon a bankruptcy event of default with respect to the OP or the General Partner), the commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility will mature, and payment of any unpaid amounts in respect of the Credit Facility will be accelerated. The Credit Facility terminates on June 30, 2018 , unless extended in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for a one-year extension option, exercisable at the Company’s election and subject to certain customary conditions, as well as certain customary “amend and extend” provisions. At any time, upon timely notice by the OP and subject to any breakage fees, the OP may prepay borrowings under the Credit Facility (subject to certain limitations applicable to the prepayment of any loans obtained through an interest rate auction, as described above). The OP incurs a fee equal to 0.15% to 0.25% per annum (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating) multiplied by the commitments (whether or not utilized) in respect of the revolving credit facility. In addition, the OP incurs customary administrative agent, letter of credit issuance, letter of credit fronting, extension and other fees.
Credit Facility Covenants
The Credit Facility requires restrictions on corporate guarantees, as well as the maintenance of certain financial covenants. The key financial covenants in the Credit Facility, as defined and calculated per the terms of the Credit Agreement include maintaining the following:
Unsecured Credit Facility Key Covenants
 
Required
Minimum tangible net worth
 
≥ $5.5 B
Ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value
 
≤ 60%
Ratio of adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges
 
≥ 1.5x
Ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value
 
≤ 45%
Ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value
 
≤ 60%
Ratio of unencumbered adjusted NOI to unsecured interest expense
 
≥ 1.75x
Minimum unencumbered asset value
 
≥ $8.0 B

For the purposes of determining unencumbered asset value, the Company is permitted to include restaurant properties representing up to 30% of its unencumbered asset value in such calculation.
The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the Credit Agreement and is not restricted from accessing any borrowing availability under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017 .

48


Corporate Bonds
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2017 , the OP had $2.85 billion aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes outstanding. The indenture governing the Senior Notes requires that the Company be in compliance with certain key financial covenants, including maintaining the following:
Corporate Bond Key Covenants
 
Required
Limitation on incurrence of total debt
 
≤ 65%
Limitation on incurrence of secured debt
 
≤ 40%
Debt service coverage ratio
 
≥ 1.5x
Maintenance of total unencumbered assets
 
≥ 150%
There were no changes to the financial covenants of our existing Senior Notes during the year ended December 31, 2017 . The covenants of our new Senior Notes issued in 2017 are materially the same as our then existing Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2017 , the Company believes that it was in compliance with these financial covenants based on the covenant limits and calculations in place at that time.
Convertible Debt
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2017 , the Company had  $1.0 billion  aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes (as defined in Note 10 – Debt ). The OP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the General Partner. There were no changes to the terms of the Convertible Notes and the Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2017 .
Mortgage Notes Payable and Other Debt
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2017 , we had non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of $2.1 billion , which was collateralized by 472 properties, reflecting a decrease from December 31, 2016 of $558.9 million derived primarily from our disposition activity during the year ended December 31, 2017 . Our mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the weighted-average rate of 4.92% per annum and had a weighted-average maturity of 4.1 years. We may in the future incur additional mortgage debt on the properties we currently own or use long-term non-recourse financing to acquire additional properties.
The payment terms of our loan obligations vary. In general, only interest amounts are payable monthly with all unpaid principal and interest due at maturity. Some of our loan agreements require that we comply with specific reporting and financial covenants mainly related to debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Each loan that has these requirements has specific ratio thresholds that must be met.
Restrictions on Loan Covenants
Our mortgage loan obligations generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios), as well as the maintenance of a minimum net worth. The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. At December 31, 2017 , the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements, except for the $16.2 million loan in default as described above and in “ Note 10 – Debt ” to our consolidated financial statements.
Other Debt
During the fourth quarter of 2017 , the Company repaid the remaining outstanding principal balance on the secured term loan from KBC Bank, N.V. (the “KBC Loan”).
Dividends
On November 7, 2017 , the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of  $0.1375  per share of common stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of $0.55  per share) for the fourth quarter of 2017 to stockholders of record as of December 29, 2017, which was paid on January 16, 2018 . An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP unit.

49


Our Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in “Note 15 – Equity” to our consolidated financial statements, will pay cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis). As of December 31, 2017 , there were approximately 42.8 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock (and approximately 42.8 million corresponding Series F Preferred Units that were issued to the General Partner) and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units that were issued and outstanding.
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
 
 
Total
 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3 years
 
4-5 years
 
More than
5 years
Principal payments - mortgage notes (1)
 
$
2,071,038

 
$
98,450

 
$
487,975

 
$
667,609

 
$
817,004

Interest payments - mortgage notes (1) (2) (3)
 
421,575

 
100,177

 
176,655

 
108,534

 
36,209

Principal payments - Credit Facility
 
185,000

 
185,000

 

 

 

Interest payments - Credit Facility   (3)
 
2,854

 
2,854

 

 

 

Principal payments - corporate bonds
 
2,850,000

 

 
750,000

 
400,000

 
1,700,000

Interest payments - corporate bonds
 
695,599

 
114,950

 
187,088

 
158,775

 
234,786

Principal payments - convertible debt
 
1,000,000

 
597,500

 
402,500

 

 

Interest payments - convertible debt
 
55,067

 
25,550

 
29,517

 

 

Operating and ground lease commitments
 
308,434

 
18,917

 
37,565

 
36,443

 
215,509

Total
 
$
7,589,567

 
$
1,143,398

 
$
2,071,300

 
$
1,371,361

 
$
3,003,508

____________________________________
(1)
For the loan in maturity default, as discussed in Note 10 – Debt , the payment obligations for future periods are based on an estimated extension of maturity to January 1, 2018.
(2)
As of  December 31, 2017 , we had  $78.9 million  of variable rate mortgage notes effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the effective interest rates fixed under our swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(3)
Interest payments due in future periods on the $14.9 million of variable rate debt and the Credit Facility payment obligations were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2017
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2017 , net cash provided by operating activities  decreased $4.7 million to $793.3 million from $797.9 million during the same period in 2016 . The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in rental receipts related to the disposition of 438 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016 and an increase in litigation and other non-routine costs paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 . This decrease was mostly offset by a decrease in interest payments and insurance recoveries received as compared to the same period in 2016 , the receipt of an income tax refund during the year ended December 31, 2017 , and an increase in rental receipts related to the acquisition of 96 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016.
Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 changed $1.2 billion to $274.1 million from cash provided by investing activities of $881.6 million during the same period in 2016 . The change was primarily related to an increase in investments in real estate assets of $598.8 million , a decrease in cash proceeds from dispositions of real estate and joint ventures of $555.2 million .
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $756.6 million decreased $750.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 from $1.5 billion during the same period in 2016 . The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in repayments of debt, net of proceeds, of $1.5 billion , which was partially offset by the 2016 common stock offering resulting in net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering costs, of $702.8 million and an increase in distributions paid of $28.1 million .
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities  decreased $61.7 million to $797.9 million from $859.7 million during the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in rental receipts related to the disposition of 529 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2015. This decrease was partially offset by a decrease in interest payments and payments related to the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation, net of insurance recoveries.

50


Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $59.8 million to $881.6 million from $941.4 million during the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily related to an increase in investments in real estate assets of $63.9 million , an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture of $25.8 million during 2016 and a decrease in uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets of $35.4 million . These decreases were partially offset by a decrease in real estate development payments of $40.3 million and the receipt of $50.0 million on the Affiliate Lines of Credit, as compared to $10.0 million in 2015.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $1.5 billion decreased $644.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 from $2.2 billion during the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the 2016 common stock offering resulting in net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering costs, of $702.5 million and an increase in proceeds from debt, net of repayments, of $306.3 million , which were partially offset by an increase in distributions paid of $345.0 million
Election as a REIT
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2017 .
The Operating Partnership is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the Operating Partnership is required to take into account its allocable share of the Operating Partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the Operating Partnership may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property. Under the LPA, the Operating Partnership is required to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
The Company conducted substantially all of its Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Canadian federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. However, net leases that require the tenant to pay its allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, may reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
Through the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we were contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis, identifying and making acquisitions and investments on the Cole REITs’ behalf, and recommending to each of the Cole REIT’s respective board of directors an approach for providing investors with liquidity. In addition, we distributed the shares of common stock for certain of the Cole REITs and advised them regarding offerings, managed relationships with participating broker-dealers and financial advisors, and provided assistance in connection with compliance matters relating to the offerings. We received compensation and reimbursement for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment, management and disposition of their respective assets, as applicable. See “ Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements ” to our consolidated financial statements in this report for a further explanation of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

51


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable-rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes in earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, collars and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We have limited operations in Canada and thus, are not exposed to material foreign currency fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2017 , our debt included fixed-rate debt, including debt that has interest rates that are fixed with the use of derivative instruments, with a fair value and carrying value of $6.1 billion and $5.9 billion , respectively. Changes in market interest rates on our fixed rate debt impact the fair value of the debt, but they have no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates rise 100 basis points and the fixed rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our debt to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2017 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of $224.9 million . A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of $279.1 million .
As of December 31, 2017 , our debt included variable-rate debt with a fair value and carrying value each of $200.1 million and $199.9 million . The sensitivity analysis related to our variable-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2017 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates on our variable-rate notes payable would increase or decrease our interest expense by $2.0 million annually. See “ Note 10 – Debt ” to our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2017 , our interest rate swaps had a fair value that resulted in assets of $0.6 million . See “ Note 11 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities ” to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2017 , it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company is subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, geographies or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs ( i.e. , expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this document.

52

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
I. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the General Partner
For purposes of the discussion in this Part I of Item 9A, the “Company” refers to the General Partner.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of  December 31, 2017  and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017 .
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of  December 31, 2017  has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
II. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the Operating Partnership
In the information incorporated by reference into this Part II of Item 9A, the term “Company” refers to the Operating Partnership, except as the context otherwise requires.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer

53

Table of Contents

and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of  December 31, 2017  and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017 .
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

54

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 21, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exist, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 2018



55

Table of Contents

Item 9B. Other Information.
The following disclosure would have otherwise been filed in a Current Report on Form 8-K under the heading “Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.”
 
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Glenn J. Rufrano
 
Effective February 21, 2018, the Company amended (the “Rufrano Amendment”) the Employment Agreement dated as of March 10, 2015 with Glenn J. Rufrano (the “Rufrano Employment Agreement”), to extend Mr. Rufrano’s term as Chief Executive Officer to April 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Rufrano Amendment, future annual long term incentive awards will not have a minimum guaranteed amount and the vesting of any unvested awards upon termination will be governed by the terms in the applicable award agreement.

The foregoing description of the Rufrano Amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such amendment a copy of which is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


56

Table of Contents

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

57

Table of Contents

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
The Financial Statements are included herein at pages F-1 through F-68.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included herein on page F-69.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included herein on pages F-70 through F-204.
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans Held for Investment is included herein on page F-205.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No.
 
Description
2.1
 
2.2
 
2.3
 
2.4
 
2.4.1
 
2.4.2
 
2.5
 
3.1
 
3.2
 
3.3
 
3.4
 
3.5
 
3.6
 
3.7
 

58

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.
 
Description
3.8
 
3.9
 
3.10
 
3.11
 
3.12
 
3.13
 
4.1
 
4.2
 
4.3
 
4.4
 
4.5
 
4.6
 
4.7
 
4.8
 
4.9
 
4.10
 
4.11
 
4.12
 
4.13
 
4.14
 
4.15
 
4.16
 
10.1
 
10.2
 

59

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.
 
Description
10.3
 
10.4
 
10.5
 
10.6
 
10.7
 
10.8
 
10.9
 
10.10
 
10.11
 
10.12
 
10.13
 
10.14
 
10.15
 
10.16
 
10.17
 
10.18
 
10.19
 
10.20
 
10.21
 
10.22
 
10.23
 

60

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.
 
Description
10.24
 
10.25
 
10.26
 
10.27
 
10.28
 
10.29
 
10.30
 
10.31
 
10.32
 
10.33
 
10.34*
 
10.35*
 
10.36*
 
10.37*
 
10.38*
 
10.39*
 
10.40*
 
10.41*
 
12.1*
 
21.1*
 
23.1*
 
23.2*
 
31.1*
 
31.2*
 
31.3*
 

61

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.
 
Description
31.4*
 
32.1**
 
32.2**
 
32.3**
 
32.4**
 
101.INS*
 
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
_____________________________
*
Filed herewith
**
In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

62

Table of Contents

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not Applicable


63

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
VEREIT, INC.
 
By:
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
 
By: VEREIT, Inc., its sole general partner
 
By:
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 21, 2018

64

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
 
Capacity *
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
February 21, 2018
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
February 21, 2018
Michael J. Bartolotta
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Gavin B. Brandon
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
 
February 21, 2018
Gavin B. Brandon
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Hugh R. Frater
 
Director, Non-Executive Chairman
 
February 21, 2018
Hugh R. Frater
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ David B. Henry
 
Director
 
February 21, 2018
David B. Henry
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Mary Hogan Preusse
 
Director
 
February 21, 2018
Mary Hogan Preusse
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Richard Lieb
 
Director
 
February 21, 2018
Richard Lieb
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Mark S. Ordan
 
Director
 
February 21, 2018
Mark S. Ordan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Eugene A. Pinover
 
Director
 
February 21, 2018
Eugene A. Pinover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Julie G. Richardson
 
Director
 
February 21, 2018
Julie G. Richardson
 
 
 
 
_________________________________
*
Each person is signing in his or her capacity as an officer and/or director of VEREIT, Inc., which is the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

65

Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Page
Financial Statements
F-69
F-70
F-205


F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards required that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.


F-2

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the partners of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P and subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 2018

We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.


F-3

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments, at cost:
 
 
 
 
Land
 
$
2,865,855

 
$
2,895,625

Buildings, fixtures and improvements
 
10,711,845

 
10,644,296

Intangible lease assets
 
2,037,675

 
2,044,521

Total real estate investments, at cost
 
15,615,375

 
15,584,442

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
2,908,028

 
2,331,643

Total real estate investments, net
 
12,707,347

 
13,252,799

Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
42,784

 
46,077

Investment in direct financing leases, net
 
19,539

 
39,455

Investment securities, at fair value
 
40,974

 
47,215

Mortgage notes receivable, net
 
20,294

 
22,764

Cash and cash equivalents
 
34,176

 
253,479

Restricted cash
 
27,662

 
45,018

Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net
 
304,989

 
314,305

Goodwill
 
1,337,773

 
1,337,391

Due from affiliates, net
 
6,041

 
15,904

Assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
163,999

 
213,167

Total assets
 
$
14,705,578


$
15,587,574

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net
 
$
2,082,692

 
$
2,671,106

Corporate bonds, net
 
2,821,494

 
2,226,224

Convertible debt, net
 
984,258

 
973,340

Credit facility, net
 
185,000

 
496,578

Below-market lease liabilities, net
 
198,551

 
224,023

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
136,474

 
134,861

Deferred rent and other liabilities
 
62,985

 
67,971

Distributions payable
 
175,301

 
162,578

Due to affiliates
 
66

 
16

Liabilities related to discontinued operations
 
15,881

 
11,344

Total liabilities
 
6,662,702

 
6,968,041

Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
 

 


Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
428

 
428

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 974,208,583 and 974,146,650 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
9,742

 
9,741

Additional paid-in-capital
 
12,654,258

 
12,640,171

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(3,569
)
 
(2,556
)
Accumulated deficit
 
(4,776,581
)
 
(4,200,423
)
Total stockholders’ equity
 
7,884,278

 
8,447,361

Non-controlling interests
 
158,598

 
172,172

Total equity
 
8,042,876

 
8,619,533

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
14,705,578


$
15,587,574


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-4

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
 
$
1,154,147

 
$
1,229,992

 
$
1,342,507

Operating expense reimbursements
 
98,138

 
105,455

 
98,628

Total revenues
 
1,252,285


1,335,447

 
1,441,135

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition-related
 
3,402

 
1,321

 
6,243

Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries
 
47,960

 
3,884

 
33,628

Property operating
 
128,717

 
144,428

 
130,855

General and administrative
 
58,603

 
51,927

 
67,137

Depreciation and amortization
 
706,802

 
762,038

 
821,727

Impairments
 
50,548

 
182,820

 
91,755

Total operating expenses
 
996,032


1,146,418

 
1,151,345

Operating income
 
256,253


189,029

 
289,790

Other (expense) income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
(289,766
)
 
(317,376
)
 
(358,392
)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net
 
18,373

 
(771
)
 
4,812

Other income, net
 
6,242

 
5,251

 
9,366

Reserve for loan loss
 

 

 
(15,300
)
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities
 
2,763

 
9,783

 
9,092

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net
 
2,976

 
(1,191
)
 
(1,460
)
Total other expenses, net
 
(259,412
)

(304,304
)
 
(351,882
)
Income (loss) before taxes and real estate dispositions
 
(3,159
)

(115,275
)
 
(62,092
)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
61,536

 
45,524

 
(72,311
)
Income (loss) before taxes
 
58,377


(69,751
)

(134,403
)
Provision for income taxes
 
(6,882
)
 
(7,136
)
 
(4,589
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
51,495


(76,887
)
 
(138,992
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
Net income (loss)
 
32,378

 
(200,824
)
 
(323,492
)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 
(560
)
 
4,961

 
7,139

Net income (loss) attributable to the General Partner
 
$
31,818


$
(195,863
)
 
$
(316,353
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.23
)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.20
)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.29
)
 
$
(0.43
)
Distributions declared per common share
 
$
0.55

 
$
0.55

 
$
0.28

_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents (income) loss attributable to limited partners and consolidated joint venture partners.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss)
 
$
32,378

 
$
(200,824
)
 
$
(323,492
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives
 
(18
)
 
(7,685
)
 
(15,694
)
Reclassification of previous unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives into net income (loss)
 
(70
)
 
9,397

 
11,706

Unrealized loss on investment securities, net
 
(951
)
 
(2,271
)
 
(997
)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net income (loss) as other income, net
 

 

 
110

Total other comprehensive loss
 
(1,039
)
 
(559
)
 
(4,875
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive income (loss)
 
31,339

 
(201,383
)
 
(328,367
)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 
(534
)
 
4,989

 
7,261

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the General Partner
 
$
30,805

 
$
(196,394
)

$
(321,106
)
_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents comprehensive (income) loss attributable to limited partners and consolidated joint venture partners.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-6

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for share data)

 
 
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number
of Shares
 
Par
Value
 
Number
of Shares
 
Par
Value
 
Additional Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total Stock-holders’ Equity
 
Non-Controlling Interests
 
Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2015
 
42,834,138

 
$
428

 
905,530,431

 
$
9,055


$
11,920,253


$
2,728


$
(2,778,576
)

$
9,153,888


$
228,442


$
9,382,330

Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligation
 

 

 
(268,414
)
 
(2
)
 
(2,225
)
 

 

 
(2,227
)
 

 
(2,227
)
Equity-based compensation, net
 

 

 
(377,623
)
 
(4
)
 
14,504

 

 

 
14,500

 

 
14,500

Tax shortfall from equity-based compensation
 

 

 

 

 
(764
)
 

 

 
(764
)
 

 
(764
)
Distributions declared on common stock
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(248,476
)
 
(248,476
)
 

 
(248,476
)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(45,594
)
 
(45,594
)
Distributions to participating securities
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(410
)
 
(410
)
 

 
(410
)
Distributions to preferred shareholders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(71,418
)
 
(71,418
)
 
(474
)
 
(71,892
)
Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
14,859

 
14,859

Net loss
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(316,353
)
 
(316,353
)
 
(7,139
)
 
(323,492
)
Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(4,753
)
 

 
(4,753
)
 
(122
)
 
(4,875
)
Balance, December 31, 2015

42,834,138

 
$
428

 
904,884,394

 
$
9,049

 
$
11,931,768

 
$
(2,025
)
 
$
(3,415,233
)

$
8,523,987


$
189,972


$
8,713,959

Issuance of common stock, net
 

 

 
69,000,000

 
690

 
701,786

 

 

 
702,476

 

 
702,476

Conversion of OP units to common stock
 

 

 
15,450

 

 
159

 

 

 
159

 
(159
)
 

Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligation
 

 

 
(481,261
)
 
(5
)
 
(4,647
)
 

 

 
(4,652
)
 

 
(4,652
)
Equity-based compensation, net
 

 

 
728,067

 
7

 
10,721

 

 

 
10,728

 

 
10,728

Contributions from non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
675

 
675

Distributions declared on common stock
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(516,703
)
 
(516,703
)
 

 
(516,703
)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(13,183
)
 
(13,183
)
Distributions to participating securities
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(492
)
 
(492
)
 

 
(492
)
Distributions to preferred shareholders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(71,748
)
 
(71,748
)
 
(144
)
 
(71,892
)
Cumulative effect adjustment for equity-based compensation forfeitures
 

 

 

 

 
384

 

 
(384
)
 

 

 

Net loss
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(195,863
)
 
(195,863
)
 
(4,961
)
 
(200,824
)
Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(531
)
 

 
(531
)
 
(28
)
 
(559
)
Balance, December 31, 2016
 
42,834,138


$
428


974,146,650


$
9,741


$
12,640,171


$
(2,556
)

$
(4,200,423
)

$
8,447,361


$
172,172


$
8,619,533

Repurchases of common stock under the Share Repurchase Program (1)
 

 

 
(68,759
)
 
(1
)
 
(517
)
 

 

 
(518
)
 

 
(518
)
Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligation
 

 

 
(268,550
)
 
(2
)
 
(2,146
)
 

 

 
(2,148
)
 

 
(2,148
)
Equity-based compensation, net
 

 

 
399,242

 
4

 
16,750

 

 

 
16,754

 

 
16,754

Contributions from non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
101

 
101

Distributions declared on common stock
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(535,737
)
 
(535,737
)
 

 
(535,737
)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(13,227
)
 
(13,227
)

F-7

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for share data)


 
 
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number
of Shares
 
Par
Value
 
Number
of Shares
 
Par
Value
 
Additional Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total Stock-holders’ Equity
 
Non-Controlling Interests
 
Total Equity
Distributions to participating securities
 

 
$

 

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(491
)
 
$
(491
)
 
$

 
$
(491
)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(71,748
)
 
(71,748
)
 
(144
)
 
(71,892
)
Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(838
)
 
(838
)
Net income
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
31,818

 
31,818

 
560

 
32,378

Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(1,013
)
 

 
(1,013
)
 
(26
)
 
(1,039
)
Balance, December 31, 2017
 
42,834,138

 
$
428

 
974,208,583

 
$
9,742

 
$
12,654,258

 
$
(3,569
)
 
$
(4,776,581
)
 
$
7,884,278

 
$
158,598

 
$
8,042,876

___________________________________
(1)
The Company’s Share Repurchase Program (as defined in Note 15 –  Equity ), which was authorized by the board of directors on May 12, 2017, allows for the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock over the next 12 months.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-8

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 

 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
32,378

 
$
(200,824
)
 
$
(323,492
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
745,499

 
806,548

 
866,549

(Gain) loss on real estate assets and joint venture, net
 
(61,536
)
 
(55,722
)
 
65,582

Held for sale loss on discontinued operations
 
20,027

 

 

Impairments
 
50,548

 
303,751

 
305,094

Equity-based compensation
 
16,751

 
10,728

 
14,500

Reserve for loan loss
 

 

 
15,300

Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated entities
 
(2,726
)
 
415

 
(2,361
)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
 
3,646

 
1,433

 
4,873

Gain on early repayment of mortgage notes receivable and sale of investment securities
 
(65
)
 

 
(65
)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net
 
(2,976
)
 
1,191

 
1,460

(Gain) loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net
 
(18,373
)
 
771

 
(4,812
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in direct financing leases
 
2,097

 
3,976

 
2,035

Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net
 
(21,394
)
 
(52,626
)
 
(63,195
)
Due from affiliates, net
 
1,163

 
(416
)
 
25,489

Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations
 
13,812

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
10,742

 
(3,323
)
 
(999
)
Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities
 
(395
)
 
(17,740
)
 
(45,934
)
Due to affiliates
 
50

 
(214
)
 
(329
)
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
 
4,019

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
793,267

 
797,948

 
859,695

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in real estate assets
 
(699,004
)
 
(100,194
)
 
(36,319
)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs
 
(21,694
)
 
(16,568
)
 
(18,569
)
Real estate developments
 
(14,850
)
 
(17,411
)
 
(57,682
)
Principal repayments received from borrowers
 
6,796

 
5,417

 
6,921

Investments in unconsolidated entities
 

 
(25,777
)
 

Return of investment from unconsolidated entities
 
1,972

 
2,580

 
6,479

Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture
 
445,525

 
1,000,700

 
1,009,107

Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets
 
(1,191
)
 
(2,259
)
 
(1,911
)
Deposits for real estate assets
 
(37,226
)
 
(17,856
)
 
(16,542
)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets
 
400

 

 
392

Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets
 
36,111

 
13,305

 
48,702

Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims
 
355

 

 
839

Line of credit advances to affiliates
 
(16,400
)
 
(10,300
)
 
(10,000
)
Line of credit repayments from affiliates
 
25,100

 
50,000

 
10,000

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
(274,106
)
 
881,637

 
941,417

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable
 
4,652

 
3,112

 
1,445

 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment and swap termination costs
 
(424,385
)
 
(337,022
)
 
(188,892
)
Proceeds from credit facility
 
329,000

 
1,033,000

 
60,000

Payments on credit facility, including swap termination costs
 
(645,107
)
 
(1,993,000
)
 
(1,784,000
)
Proceeds from corporate bonds
 
600,000

 
1,000,000

 

Payments on corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs
 

 
(1,311,203
)
 


F-9

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)


 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Payments of deferred financing costs
 
(9,575
)
 
(19,872
)
 
(2,436
)
Proceeds from 2016 Term Loan
 

 
300,000

 

Repayment of 2016 Term Loan
 

 
(300,000
)
 

Repurchases of common stock under the Share Repurchase Program
 
(518
)
 

 

Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligations
 
(2,148
)
 
(4,652
)
 
(2,227
)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount
 

 
702,765

 

Payments of equity issuance costs
 

 
(280
)
 

Contributions from non-controlling interest holders
 
101

 
675

 

Distributions paid
 
(608,615
)
 
(580,508
)
 
(235,494
)
Net cash used in financing activities
 
(756,595
)
 
(1,506,985
)
 
(2,151,604
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
 
(237,434
)
 
172,600

 
(350,492
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period
 
301,470

 
128,870

 
479,362

Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations
 
(2,973
)
 
(4,968
)
 
(5,850
)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period
 
298,497

 
123,902

 
473,512

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period
 
64,036

 
301,470

 
128,870

Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations
 
(2,198
)
 
(2,973
)
 
(4,968
)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period
 
$
61,838

 
$
298,497

 
$
123,902

Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
$
253,479

 
$
64,135

 
$
410,861

Restricted cash at beginning of period
 
45,018

 
59,767

 
62,651

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
 
298,497

 
123,902

 
473,512

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
34,176

 
253,479

 
64,135

Restricted cash at end of period
 
27,662

 
45,018

 
59,767

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
 
$
61,838

 
$
298,497

 
$
123,902


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-10

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)

 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments, at cost:
 
 
 
 
Land
 
$
2,865,855

 
$
2,895,625

Buildings, fixtures and improvements
 
10,711,845

 
10,644,296

Intangible lease assets
 
2,037,675

 
2,044,521

Total real estate investments, at cost
 
15,615,375


15,584,442

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
2,908,028

 
2,331,643

Total real estate investments, net
 
12,707,347


13,252,799

Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
42,784

 
46,077

Investment in direct financing leases, net
 
19,539

 
39,455

Investment securities, at fair value
 
40,974

 
47,215

Mortgage notes receivable, net
 
20,294

 
22,764

Cash and cash equivalents
 
34,176

 
253,479

Restricted cash
 
27,662

 
45,018

Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net
 
304,989

 
314,305

Goodwill
 
1,337,773

 
1,337,391

Due from affiliates, net
 
6,041

 
15,904

Assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
163,999

 
213,167

Total assets
 
$
14,705,578


$
15,587,574

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 

Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net
 
$
2,082,692

 
$
2,671,106

Corporate bonds, net
 
2,821,494

 
2,226,224

Convertible debt, net
 
984,258

 
973,340

Credit facility, net
 
185,000

 
496,578

Below-market lease liabilities, net
 
198,551

 
224,023

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
136,474

 
134,861

Deferred rent and other liabilities
 
62,985

 
67,971

Distributions payable
 
175,301

 
162,578

Due to affiliates
 
66

 
16

Liabilities related to discontinued operations
 
15,881

 
11,344

Total liabilities
 
6,662,702


6,968,041

Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
 


 


General Partner's preferred equity, 42,834,138 General Partner Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
782,073

 
853,821

General Partner's common equity, 974,208,583 and 974,146,650 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
7,102,205

 
7,593,540

Limited Partner's preferred equity, 86,874 Limited Partner Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
3,027

 
3,171

Limited Partner's common equity, 23,748,347 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
154,266

 
166,598

Total partners’ equity
 
8,041,571


8,617,130

Non-controlling interests
 
1,305

 
2,403

Total equity
 
8,042,876


8,619,533

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
14,705,578


$
15,587,574


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-11

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per unit data)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
 
$
1,154,147

 
$
1,229,992

 
$
1,342,507

Operating expense reimbursements
 
98,138

 
105,455

 
98,628

Total revenues

1,252,285


1,335,447

 
1,441,135

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition-related
 
3,402

 
1,321

 
6,243

Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries
 
47,960

 
3,884

 
33,628

Property operating
 
128,717

 
144,428

 
130,855

General and administrative
 
58,603

 
51,927

 
67,137

Depreciation and amortization
 
706,802

 
762,038

 
821,727

Impairments
 
50,548

 
182,820

 
91,755

Total operating expenses

996,032


1,146,418

 
1,151,345

Operating income

256,253


189,029

 
289,790

Other (expense) income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
(289,766
)
 
(317,376
)
 
(358,392
)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net
 
18,373

 
(771
)
 
4,812

Other income, net
 
6,242

 
5,251

 
9,366

Reserve for loan loss
 

 

 
(15,300
)
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities
 
2,763

 
9,783

 
9,092

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net
 
2,976

 
(1,191
)
 
(1,460
)
Total other expenses, net

(259,412
)

(304,304
)
 
(351,882
)
Income (loss) before taxes and real estate dispositions

(3,159
)

(115,275
)
 
(62,092
)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
61,536

 
45,524

 
(72,311
)
Income (loss) before taxes

58,377

 
(69,751
)
 
(134,403
)
Provision for income taxes
 
(6,882
)
 
(7,136
)
 
(4,589
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
51,495

 
(76,887
)
 
(138,992
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
Net income (loss)

32,378


(200,824
)
 
(323,492
)
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 
194

 
14

 
(1,274
)
Net income (loss) attributable to the OP

$
32,572


$
(200,810
)
 
$
(324,766
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.23
)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.20
)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.29
)
 
$
(0.43
)
Distributions declared per common unit
 
$
0.55

 
$
0.55

 
$
0.28

_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents (income) loss attributable to consolidated joint venture partners.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-12

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss)
 
$
32,378

 
$
(200,824
)
 
$
(323,492
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives
 
(18
)
 
(7,685
)
 
(15,694
)
Reclassification of previous unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives into net income (loss)
 
(70
)
 
9,397

 
11,706

Unrealized loss on investment securities, net
 
(951
)
 
(2,271
)
 
(997
)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net income (loss) as other income, net
 

 

 
110

Total other comprehensive loss
 
(1,039
)

(559
)
 
(4,875
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive income (loss)
 
31,339


(201,383
)
 
(328,367
)
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 
194

 
14

 
(1,274
)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the OP
 
$
31,533


$
(201,369
)
 
$
(329,641
)
_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents (income) loss attributable to consolidated joint venture partners.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-13

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for unit data)

 
 
Preferred Units
 
Common Units
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General Partner
 
Limited Partner
 
General Partner
 
Limited Partner
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Units
 
Capital
 
Number of Units
 
Capital
 
Number of Units
 
Capital
 
Number of Units
 
Capital
 
Total Partners' Capital
 
Non-Controlling Interests
 
Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2015
 
42,834,138

 
$
996,987

 
86,874

 
$
3,375

 
905,530,431

 
$
8,157,167


23,763,797


$
201,102


$
9,358,631


$
23,699


$
9,382,330

 Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation
 

 

 

 

 
(268,414
)
 
(2,227
)
 

 

 
(2,227
)
 

 
(2,227
)
 Equity-based compensation, net
 

 

 

 

 
(377,623
)
 
14,500

 

 

 
14,500

 

 
14,500

 Tax shortfall from equity-based compensation
 

 

 

 

 

 
(764
)
 

 

 
(764
)
 

 
(764
)
 Distributions to Common OP Units and non-controlling interests
 

 

 

 

 

 
(249,300
)
 

 
(7,619
)
 
(256,919
)
 
(37,975
)
 
(294,894
)
 Distributions to Preferred OP Units
 

 
(71,418
)
 

 
(60
)
 

 
 
 

 

 
(71,478
)
 

 
(71,478
)
 Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
14,859

 
14,859

 Net (loss) income
 

 

 

 

 

 
(316,353
)
 

 
(8,413
)
 
(324,766
)
 
1,274

 
(323,492
)
 Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(4,605
)
 

 
(270
)
 
(4,875
)
 

 
(4,875
)
Balance, December 31, 2015
 
42,834,138

 
$
925,569

 
86,874

 
$
3,315

 
904,884,394

 
$
7,598,418

 
23,763,797

 
$
184,800


$
8,712,102

 
$
1,857


$
8,713,959

Issuance of common units
 

 

 

 

 
69,000,000

 
702,476

 

 

 
702,476

 

 
702,476

Conversion of Limited Partners' Common OP Units to General Partner's Common OP Units
 

 

 

 

 
15,450

 
159

 
(15,450
)
 
(159
)
 

 

 

 Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation
 

 

 

 

 
(481,261
)
 
(4,652
)
 

 

 
(4,652
)
 

 
(4,652
)
 Equity-based compensation, net
 

 

 

 

 
728,067

 
10,728

 

 

 
10,728

 

 
10,728

 Contributions from non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
675

 
675

 Distributions to Common OP Units and non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 
(517,195
)
 

 
(13,068
)
 
(530,263
)
 
(115
)
 
(530,378
)
 Distributions to Preferred OP Units
 

 
(71,748
)
 

 
(144
)
 

 

 

 

 
(71,892
)
 

 
(71,892
)
 Net loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(195,863
)
 

 
(4,947
)
 
(200,810
)
 
(14
)
 
(200,824
)
 Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(531
)
 

 
(28
)
 
(559
)
 

 
(559
)
Balance, December 31, 2016
 
42,834,138


$
853,821


86,874


$
3,171


974,146,650


$
7,593,540


23,748,347


$
166,598


$
8,617,130


$
2,403


$
8,619,533

Repurchases of common OP Units under the Share Repurchase Program
 

 

 

 

 
(68,759
)
 
(518
)
 

 

 
(518
)
 

 
(518
)
 Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation
 

 

 

 

 
(268,550
)
 
(2,148
)
 

 

 
(2,148
)
 

 
(2,148
)
 Equity-based compensation, net
 

 

 

 

 
399,242

 
16,754

 

 

 
16,754

 

 
16,754

 Contributions from non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
101

 
101

 Distributions to Common OP Units and non-controlling interest holders
 

 

 

 

 

 
(536,228
)
 

 
(13,060
)
 
(549,288
)
 
(167
)
 
(549,455
)
 Distributions to Preferred OP Units
 

 
(71,748
)
 

 
(144
)
 

 

 

 

 
(71,892
)
 

 
(71,892
)
 Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(838
)
 
(838
)
 Net income (loss)
 

 

 

 

 

 
31,818

 

 
754

 
32,572

 
(194
)
 
32,378

 Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 
(1,013
)
 

 
(26
)
 
(1,039
)
 

 
(1,039
)
Balance, December 31, 2017
 
42,834,138


$
782,073


86,874


$
3,027


974,208,583


$
7,102,205


23,748,347


$
154,266


$
8,041,571


$
1,305


$
8,042,876


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-14

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
$
32,378

 
$
(200,824
)
 
$
(323,492
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
745,499

 
806,548

 
866,549

(Gain) loss on real estate assets and joint venture, net
 
(61,536
)
 
(55,722
)
 
65,582

Held for sale loss on discontinued operations
 
20,027

 

 

Impairments
 
50,548

 
303,751

 
305,094

Reserve for loan loss
 

 

 
15,300

Equity-based compensation
 
16,751

 
10,728

 
14,500

Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated entities
 
(2,726
)
 
415

 
(2,361
)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
 
3,646

 
1,433

 
4,873

Gain on early repayment of mortgage notes receivable and sale of investment securities
 
(65
)
 

 
(65
)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net
 
(2,976
)
 
1,191

 
1,460

(Gain) loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net
 
(18,373
)
 
771

 
(4,812
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in direct financing leases
 
2,097

 
3,976

 
2,035

Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net
 
(21,394
)
 
(52,626
)
 
(63,195
)
Due from affiliates, net
 
1,163

 
(416
)
 
25,489

Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations
 
13,812

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
10,742

 
(3,323
)
 
(999
)
Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities
 
(395
)
 
(17,740
)
 
(45,934
)
Due to affiliates
 
50

 
(214
)
 
(329
)
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
 
4,019

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
793,267


797,948


859,695

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in real estate assets
 
(699,004
)
 
(100,194
)
 
(36,319
)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs
 
(21,694
)
 
(16,568
)
 
(18,569
)
Real estate developments
 
(14,850
)
 
(17,411
)
 
(57,682
)
Principal repayments received from borrowers
 
6,796

 
5,417

 
6,921

Investments in unconsolidated entities
 

 
(25,777
)
 

Return of investment from unconsolidated entities
 
1,972

 
2,580

 
6,479

Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture
 
445,525

 
1,000,700

 
1,009,107

Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets
 
(1,191
)
 
(2,259
)
 
(1,911
)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets
 
400

 

 
392

Deposits for real estate assets
 
(37,226
)
 
(17,856
)
 
(16,542
)
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets
 
36,111

 
13,305

 
48,702

Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims
 
355

 

 
839

Line of credit advances to affiliates
 
(16,400
)
 
(10,300
)
 
(10,000
)
Line of credit repayments from affiliates
 
25,100

 
50,000

 
10,000

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
(274,106
)
 
881,637


941,417

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable
 
4,652

 
3,112

 
1,445

 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment and swap termination costs
 
(424,385
)
 
(337,022
)
 
(188,892
)
Proceeds from credit facility
 
329,000

 
1,033,000

 
60,000

Payments on credit facility, including swap termination costs
 
(645,107
)
 
(1,993,000
)
 
(1,784,000
)
Proceeds from corporate bonds
 
600,000

 
1,000,000

 

Payments on corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs
 

 
(1,311,203
)
 


F-15

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Payments of deferred financing costs
 
(9,575
)
 
(19,872
)
 
(2,436
)
Proceeds from 2016 Term Loan
 

 
300,000

 

Repayment of 2016 Term Loan
 

 
(300,000
)
 

Repurchases of common units under the Share Repurchase Program
 
(518
)
 

 

Repurchases of common units to settle tax obligations
 
(2,148
)
 
(4,652
)
 
(2,227
)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Units, net of underwriters’ discount
 

 
702,765

 

Payments of equity issuance costs
 

 
(280
)
 

Contributions from non-controlling interest holders
 
101

 
675

 

Distributions paid
 
(608,615
)
 
(580,508
)
 
(235,494
)
Net cash used in financing activities
 
(756,595
)

(1,506,985
)

(2,151,604
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
 
(237,434
)
 
172,600


(350,492
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period
 
301,470

 
128,870

 
479,362

Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations
 
(2,973
)
 
(4,968
)
 
(5,850
)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period
 
298,497

 
123,902

 
473,512

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period
 
64,036

 
301,470

 
128,870

Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations
 
(2,198
)
 
(2,973
)
 
(4,968
)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period
 
$
61,838

 
$
298,497


$
123,902

Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
$
253,479

 
$
64,135

 
$
410,861

Restricted cash at beginning of period
 
45,018

 
59,767

 
62,651

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
 
298,497

 
123,902

 
473,512

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
34,176

 
253,479

 
64,135

Restricted cash at end of period
 
27,662

 
45,018

 
59,767

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
 
$
61,838

 
$
298,497

 
$
123,902


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-16

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017


Note 1 –  Organization
VEREIT ® is a Maryland corporation, incorporated on December 2, 2010, that qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. The OP is a Delaware limited partnership of which the General Partner is the sole general partner. VEREIT’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and its 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to VEREIT, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP.
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties. The Company actively manages its portfolio considering a number of metrics including property type, concentration and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity.
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through the OP. VEREIT is the sole general partner and holder of 97.6% of the common equity interests in the OP as of December 31, 2017 with the remaining 2.4% of the common equity interests owned by unaffiliated investors and certain former directors, officers and employees of ARC Properties Advisors, LLC (the “Former Manager”). Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP Units”) for a period of one year , unless an earlier redemption is otherwise consented to by VEREIT, holders of OP Units have the right to redeem the OP Units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of VEREIT’s Common Stock or, at the option of VEREIT, a corresponding number of shares of VEREIT’s Common Stock. The remaining rights of the holders of OP Units are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the General Partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP’s assets.
The actions of the OP and its relationship with the General Partner are governed by the LPA. The General Partner does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the OP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the General Partner and the OP are the same. Additionally, pursuant to the LPA, all administrative expenses and expenses associated with the formation, continuity, existence and operation of the General Partner incurred by the General Partner on the OP’s behalf shall be treated as expenses of the OP. Further, when the General Partner issues any equity instrument that has been approved by the General Partner’s board of directors, the LPA requires the OP to issue to the General Partner equity instruments with substantially similar terms, to protect the integrity of the Company’s umbrella partnership REIT structure, pursuant to which each holder of interests in the OP has a proportionate economic interest in the OP reflecting its capital contributions thereto. OP Units issued to the General Partner are referred to as General Partner OP Units. OP Units issued to parties other than the General Partner are referred to as Limited Partner OP Units. The LPA also provides that the OP issue debt with terms and provisions consistent with debt issued by the General Partner. The LPA will be amended to provide for the issuance of any additional class of equivalent equity instruments to the extent the General Partner’s board of directors authorizes the issuance of any new class of equity securities.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment’s operations were conducted through Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. (“CCA”), an Arizona corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the OP. CCA was treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) under Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). As discussed further in Note 5 — Discontinued Operations , on November 13, 2017, the OP entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC. Under the terms of the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company agreed to sell to the Cole Purchaser all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCA and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. As the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement during the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company's financial results are reported as a single segment, and the assets, liabilities and related financial results of substantially all of the Cole Capital segment are reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations.
Note 2 –   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting
The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

F-17

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and consolidated joint venture arrangements. The portions of the consolidated joint venture arrangements not owned by the Company are presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. In addition, as described in  Note 1 –  Organization , certain third parties have been issued OP Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Upon conversion of OP Units to Common Stock, any difference between the fair value of shares of Common Stock issued and the carrying value of the OP Units converted is recorded as a component of equity. As of each of December 31, 2017  and  December 31, 2016 , there were approximately  23.7 million  Limited Partner OP Units outstanding.

For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity.
The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.
Reclassification
As described below, the following items previously reported have been reclassified to conform with the current period’s presentation.
Direct financing lease income has been reclassified to rental income for all periods presented.
The assets and liabilities to be transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement and related financial results are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In connection with the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18, discussed in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to current presentation in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-15, the Company reclassified a portion of distributions received from equity method investments which were previously reported in cash flows provided by operating activities to cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-18, transfers to or from restricted cash which have previously been shown in the Company’s investing activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows are now required to be shown as part of the total change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments, real estate investment impairment, allocation of purchase price of real estate asset acquisitions and income taxes.

F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Real Estate Investments
The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for intangible lease assets.
Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, fixtures and improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above-market and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases. In estimating fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the initial term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease, then the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to expense.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, including any bargain renewal periods. Above-market leases are amortized as a reduction to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may result in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.

In January 2017, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions were capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as described above. Prior to January 1, 2017, external costs related to property acquisitions were expensed as incurred. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Assets Held for Sale
Upon classifying a real estate investment as held for sale, the Company will no longer recognize depreciation expense related to the depreciable assets of the property. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. See Note 4 – Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles for further discussion regarding properties held for sale .
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Company will reclassify the property as held and used. The Company measures and records a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (i) its carrying value before the property was classified

F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (ii) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Development Activities
Project costs, which include interest expense, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives.
Discontinued Operations
The Company reports discontinued operations when a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 — Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations .
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements (the “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures”) using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the joint ventures’ earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 4 – Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles for further discussion on investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.
Cole REITs
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the Company owned equity investments in Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc. (“CCPT IV”), Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc. (“INAV”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”), and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V” and collectively with CCPT IV, INAV, CCIT II and CCIT III, the “Cole REITs”). The Company accounts for these investments using the equity method of accounting which requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the respective entity’s earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the Cole REITs in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements for further discussion on the Cole REITs .
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
The Company leases its corporate office facilities under operating leases. Leasehold improvements related to these are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life or remaining lease term.
Property and equipment, which typically include computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, among other items, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. The Company reassesses the useful lives of its property and equipment and adjusts the future monthly depreciation expense based on the new useful life, as applicable. If the Company disposes of an asset, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are written off upon disposal.
Goodwill
In the case of a business combination, after identifying all tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, the excess consideration paid over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and assumed, respectively, represents goodwill.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, as discussed in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” in the event the Company disposed of a property, or classified a property as an asset held for sale, that constituted a business under U.S. GAAP, the Company allocated a portion of the real estate investments reporting unit’s goodwill to that property in determining the gain or loss on the

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

disposal of the property. The amount of goodwill allocated to the business was based on the relative fair value of the business to the fair value of the reporting unit.
Impairments
Real Estate Assets
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators that the Company considers include, but are not limited to, decrease in net operating income, bankruptcy or other credit concerns of a property’s major tenant or tenants, such as history of late payments, rental concessions and other factors, as well as significant decreases in a property’s revenues due to lease terminations, vacancies, co-tenancy clauses or reduced lease rates. When impairment indicators are identified or if a property is considered to have a more likely than not probability of being disposed of within the next 12 to 24 months, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. U.S. GAAP requires us to utilize the Company’s expected holding period of our properties when assessing recoverability. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of real estate assets are discussed in Note 9 – Fair Value Measures . See also Note 4 – Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles for further discussion regarding real estate investment activity.
Goodwill
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company’s annual testing date is during the fourth quarter. In 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Others (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which allows the Company to test goodwill for impairment by comparing the carrying value of net assets to their respective fair value. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, an impairment charge will be recorded for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value. The Company estimates the fair value using discounted cash flows and relevant competitor multiples. The evaluation of goodwill for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. While the Company believes its assumptions are reasonable, there are no guarantees as to actual results. Changes in assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial results. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of goodwill are discussed in detail in Note 9 – Fair Value Measures . Goodwill activity is also discussed in Note 3 Goodwill and goodwill related to discontinued operations is discussed in Note 5 — Discontinued Operations .
Intangible Assets
The Company’s intangible assets primarily consisted of management and advisory contracts that the discontinued operations, Cole Capital, had with certain Cole REITs. There were no impairment indicators identified during the year ended December 31, 2017 .
The Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company tested intangible assets for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company adjusts the intangible assets to their respective fair values and recognized an impairment loss.


F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
The Company is required to determine whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of any of its investment in the unconsolidated entities. If an event or change in circumstance has occurred, the Company is required to evaluate its investment in the unconsolidated entity for potential impairment and determine if the carrying value of its investment exceeds its fair value. An impairment charge is recorded when an impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. The evaluation of an investment in an unconsolidated entity for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions.  The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. No impairments of unconsolidated entities were identified during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 .
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
Leasehold improvements and property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If this review indicates that the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, the Company records an impairment loss, measured at fair value by estimated discounted cash flows or market appraisals. The evaluation of leasehold improvements and property and equipment for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. No impairments of leasehold improvements and property and equipment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 .
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts, as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. The Company deposits cash with several high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit of $250,000. At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured levels. Although the Company bears risk on amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it has not experienced and does not anticipate any losses due to the high quality of the institutions where the deposits are held.
Restricted Cash
The Company had $27.7 million and $45.0 million , respectively, in restricted cash as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Restricted cash primarily consists of reserves related to lease expirations, as well as maintenance, structural and debt service reserves. In accordance with certain debt agreements, rent from certain of the Company’s tenants is deposited directly into a lockbox account, from which the monthly debt service payments are disbursed to the lender and the excess funds are then disbursed to the Company. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2017 was $26.4 million in lender reserves and $1.3 million held in restricted lockbox accounts. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2016 was $40.7 million in lender reserves and $4.3 million held in restricted lockbox accounts.
Investment in Direct Financing Leases
The Company has acquired certain properties that are subject to leases that qualify as direct financing leases in accordance with U.S. GAAP due to the significance of the lease payments from the inception of the leases compared to the fair value of the property or due to bargain purchase options. Investments in direct financing leases represent the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term. The fair value of the remaining lease payments is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates that would represent the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt. The expected residual property value at the end of the lease term is estimated using market data and assessments of the remaining useful lives of the properties at the end of the lease terms, among other factors. Income from direct financing leases is calculated using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the lease.

F-22

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Mortgage Notes Receivable
The Company classifies its mortgage notes receivable as long-term investments as the Company intends to hold the mortgage notes receivable for the foreseeable future or until maturity. Mortgage notes receivable investments are carried on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at amortized cost (unpaid principal balance adjusted for unearned discount or premium and mortgage notes receivable origination fees), net of any allowance for mortgage notes receivable losses. Discounts or premiums and mortgage notes receivable origination fees are amortized as a component of interest income using the effective interest method over the life of the respective mortgage notes receivable. From time to time, the Company may determine to sell a mortgage note receivable in which case it must reclassify the asset as held for sale. Mortgage notes receivable held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The Company also evaluates its mortgage notes receivable for possible impairment on a quarterly basis, as discussed in Note 7 – Mortgage Notes Receivable
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
The Company classifies all of its commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) as available for sale for financial accounting purposes. Under U.S. GAAP, securities classified as available for sale are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value with the net unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. Any premiums or discounts on securities are amortized as a component of interest income using the effective interest method.
The Company estimates fair value on all securities investments quarterly based on a variety of inputs. Under U.S. GAAP, securities where the fair value is less than the Company’s cost are deemed impaired and, therefore, must be measured for other-than-temporary impairment. If an impaired security ( i.e. , fair value is below cost) is intended to be sold or required to be sold prior to expected recovery of the impairment loss, the full amount of the loss must be recorded in earnings as an other-than-temporary impairment. Otherwise, temporary impairment losses are included in other comprehensive income (loss).
In estimating credit or other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers a variety of factors, including (1) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the credit, including credit rating of the security and the underlying tenant and an estimate of the likelihood, amount and expected timing of any default, (2) whether the Company expects to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value, (3) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below cost, (4) current market conditions, (5) expected cash flows from the underlying collateral and an estimate of underlying collateral values, and (6) subordination levels within the securitization pool. These estimates are highly subjective and could differ materially from actual results. From the period the Company acquired the CMBS through December 31, 2017 , the Company had no other-than-temporary impairment losses. See Note 6 –   Investment Securities, at Fair Value for further discussion.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing. Pursuant to t he Company’s adoption of the FASB ASU 2015-03, Interest Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs , the presentation of all deferred financing costs, other than those associated with the revolving credit facility, are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset . These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in connection with potential financial transactions that are not completed are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not be completed.
Convertible Debt
The Company has an outstanding aggregate balance of $1.0 billion related to the Convertible Notes (as defined in Note 10 – Debt ). The Convertible Notes are convertible into cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the Company’s option. In accordance with U.S GAAP, the Convertible Notes are accounted for as a liability with a separate equity component recorded for the conversion option. A liability was recorded for the Convertible Notes on the respective issuance date at fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current market rates for debt instruments with similar terms. The difference between the initial proceeds from the Convertible Notes and the estimated fair value of the debt instruments resulted in a debt discount, with an offset recorded to additional paid-in capital representing the equity component. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense over the respective term of the Convertible Notes.

F-23

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Derivative Instruments
The Company may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings. Certain of the techniques used to hedge exposure to interest rate fluctuations may also be used to protect against declines in the market value of assets that result from general trends in debt markets. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.
The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.
The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether each has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. If the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting treatment, any changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized immediately in loss on derivative instruments, net in the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). If the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, the change in the estimated fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent that it is effective. Any ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Revenue Recognition – Real Estate
The Company’s revenues, which primarily consist of rental income and include rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of each lease reported on a straight-line basis over the initial non-cancelable term of the lease, are recognized when earned and collectability is reasonably assured. When the Company acquires a property, the term of each existing lease is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. Since many of the leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting requires the Company to record a receivable, and include in revenues, straight-line rent receivables that the Company will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. Straight-line rent receivables are included in rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net, in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 – Rent and Tenant Receivables and Other Assets, Net . Cost recoveries from tenants are included in operating expense reimbursements in the consolidated statements of operations in the period the related costs are incurred. The Company defers the revenue related to lease payments received from tenants in advance of their due dates. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company had $56.6 million and $57.6 million , respectively, of deferred rental income, which is included in deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent and unbilled rent receivables and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of a receivable is uncertain, the Company will record an increase in the allowance for uncollectible accounts in the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of operations as a reduction to rental income. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company maintained an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $6.9 million and $6.0 million , respectively.
The Company owns certain properties that have associated leases that require the tenant to pay contingent rental income based on a percentage of the tenant’s sales after the achievement of certain sales thresholds, which may be monthly, quarterly or annual targets. As a lessor, the Company defers the recognition of contingent rental income until the specified target that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved, or until such sales upon which percentage rent is based are known.

F-24

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Revenue Recognition – Cole Capital
Revenue included securities sales commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution and stockholder servicing fees, real estate acquisition fees, financing coordination fees, property management fees, advisory fees, asset management fees and performance fees for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment and management of their respective assets, in accordance with the respective dealer manager and advisory agreements. The Company recorded dealer manager fees, excluding those related to INAV, and securities sales commissions as revenue upon the sale of Cole REIT shares. Dealer manager fees from the sale of INAV shares and distribution and stockholder servicing fees were recorded as revenue when the fees were fixed or determinable. The Company recorded revenue related to acquisition and financing coordination fees upon completion of a transaction and advisory, asset and property management fees as services were performed. The Company was also reimbursed for certain costs incurred in providing these services. Securities sales commissions and dealer manager reimbursements were recorded as revenue as the expenses were incurred, as long as reimbursement was reasonably assured. The Company, in its sole discretion, could reallow all or a portion of its dealer manager fee to such participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement, based on factors such as the volume of shares issued by such participating broker-dealers and the amount of marketing support provided by such participating broker-dealers. The Company also reallowed 100% of selling commissions earned to participating broker-dealers. Refer to Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements for further discussion.
As of December 31, 2017 , these revenues are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 — Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations .
Program Development Costs
The Company paid for organization, registration and offering expenses associated with the sale of common stock of the Cole REITs. The reimbursement of these expenses by the Cole REITs was limited to a certain percentage of the proceeds raised from their offerings, in accordance with their respective advisory agreements and charters. Such expenses paid by the Company on behalf of the Cole REITs in excess of these limits that were expected to be collected were recorded as program development costs. The Company assessed the collectability of the program development costs, considering the offering period and historical and forecasted sales of shares under the Cole REITs’ respective offerings and reserved for any balances considered not collectible. Additional reserves were generally recorded if actual proceeds raised from the offerings and corresponding program development costs incurred differed from management’s assumptions.
As of December 31, 2017 , program development costs are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 — Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations .
Acquisition-Related Expenses and Litigation, Merger and Other Non-routine Costs, Net of Insurance Recoveries
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to these asset acquisitions were capitalized. Prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, external costs related to real estate acquisitions were expensed as incurred. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Any costs incurred as a result of a business combination will be classified as acquisition-related expenses or other non-routine transaction related expenses and expensed as incurred.
External acquisition-related costs incurred in relation to prior mergers and litigation resulting therefrom are included in litigation and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company has also incurred legal fees and other costs associated with the Audit Committee Investigation (defined below) and the litigations and investigations resulting therefrom, which are considered non-routine. The Company has directors’ and officers’ insurance and the insurance carriers have paid certain defense costs subject to standard reservation of rights under the respective policies.

F-25

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries include the following costs (amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Merger Related Costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transfer taxes (1)
 
$
(1,595
)
 
$
562

 
$
(2,509
)
Litigation and other non-routine costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Audit Committee Investigation and related matters (2)
 
49,434

 
24,207

 
44,242

Legal fees and expenses (3)
 
421

 
311

 
2,704

Other fees and expenses
 

 

 
632

Total costs incurred
 
48,260


25,080

 
45,069

Insurance recoveries
 
(300
)
 
(21,196
)
 
(11,441
)
Total
 
$
47,960

 
$
3,884

 
$
33,628

___________________________________
(1)
The negative balance for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015 are a result of estimated costs accrued in prior periods that exceeded actual expenses incurred.
(2)
Includes all fees and costs associated with the previously-announced investigation conducted by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s board of directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”) and various litigations and investigations prompted by the results of the Audit Committee Investigation, including fees and costs incurred pursuant to the Company’s advancement obligations, litigation related there to and in connection with related insurance recovery matters.
(3)
Includes legal fees and expenses associated with litigation resulting from prior mergers.

Due from Affiliates
The Company received compensation and reimbursement for services primarily relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment, management, financing and disposition of their respective assets. Refer to Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements for further explanation. The amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets are receivables that will be settled directly with the respective Cole REITs and were not transferred pursuant the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement.
Equity-based Compensation
The Company has an equity-based incentive award plan for non-executive directors, officers, other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under U.S. GAAP for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met. See Note 16 – Equity-based Compensation for additional information on these plans.
Per Share Data
Income (loss) per basic share of Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) less dividends on unvested restricted shares of Common Stock and dividends on preferred stock by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted income (loss) per share of Common Stock considers the effect of potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period.
Reportable Segments
Prior to the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.

F-26

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Income Taxes
The General Partner currently qualifies and has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
The OP is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the OP is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the OP is required to take into account its allocable share of the OP’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the OP may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property.
As of December 31, 2017 , the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the OP, the General Partner, American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. (“ARCT III”), CapLease, Inc. (“CapLease”), American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., (“ARCT IV”), Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc. (“Cole”) and Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. are subject.
Under the LPA, the OP is to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
The Company conducted substantially all of its Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Canadian federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation. The provision for or benefit from income taxes attributable to Cole Capital are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 — Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations .
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with current authoritative accounting and tax guidance. The tax provision or benefit related to significant or unusual items is recognized in the quarter in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the quarter in which the change occurs. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for or benefit from income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition, Accounting Standards Codification  (“ASC”) (Topic 605) and will require an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For public business entities, the guidance should be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach, which  requires applying the new standard to all existing contracts not yet completed as of the effective date and recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company plans to use the modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. Once ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which, as discussed below, sets forth principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, goes into effect, ASU 2014-09 may apply to non-lease components in the lease agreements. In January 2018, the FASB proposed amending Topic 842 to allow lessors the option to combine lease and non-lease components when certain criteria are met. The Company has completed its evaluation of the standard’s impact on the Company’s revenue streams and does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

F-27

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which will require that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability and the disclosure of key information about the entity’s leasing arrangements. The lessor accounting model under ASU 2016-02 is similar to current guidance, however it limits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, such as internally generated costs. ASU 2016-02 retains a distinction between finance leases ( i.e., capital leases under current U.S. GAAP) and operating leases. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases will be substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases under current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required for existing leases that have not expired upon adoption and provides for certain practical expedients. The Company’s implementation team has developed an inventory of all leases and is identifying any non-lease components in the lease agreements and is evaluating the impact to the Company, both as lessor and lessee, and its consolidated financial statements. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company will record certain expenses paid directly by a tenant that protect the Company’s interests in its properties, such as real estate taxes, and the related operating expense reimbursement revenue, with no impact on net income. The Company currently does not record such expenses and the related operating expenses reimbursement revenues. The Company expects the accounting for leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee to change and is currently evaluating the impact. Leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee primarily consist of corporate offices and ground leases.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other such commitments. ASU 2016-13 requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminates the “incurred loss” methodology under current U.S. GAAP. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this amendment will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which is intended to address diversity in practice related to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, and requires retrospective adoption unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it is to be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 and determined that this standard impacts the Company’s classification of proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims and distributions received from equity method investments. Following the retrospective adoption of this standard, the Company reclassified $2.6 million and $6.5 million of distributions received from equity method investments from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company also reclassified $0.8 million of proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In accordance with ASU 2016-18, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The amendments of ASU 2016-18 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 during the fourth quarter of 2017 and applied the standard retrospectively for all periods presented. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , the Company included restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows and removed the change in restricted cash from cash flows from investing activities. This change resulted in a decrease in cash flows from investing activities of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 and an increase of $1.5 million in cash flows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-18, the Company also included $3.6 million and $4.4 million , during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively, of restricted cash outflows within the “payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment and swap termination costs’’ line item within cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

F-28

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be applied prospectively to any transactions occurring within the period of adoption. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2017. As the Company expects that a majority of its real estate acquisitions will be considered asset acquisitions, external acquisition costs related to these asset acquisitions will be capitalized. Prior to 2017, all acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred. The adoption of this pronouncement resulted in capitalization of $3.3 million of external acquisitions-related costs during the year ended December 31, 2017 . Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-01, the Company's real estate dispositions qualify as asset dispositions and as such, no portion of the Company’s goodwill was allocated to the cost basis of these assets in determining the gain or loss on disposition of real estate and held for sale assets. Prior to January 1, 2017, when the Company disposed of a property or classified a property as held for sale, it constituted a business per U.S. GAAP and the Company allocated a portion of goodwill to the cost basis of that property in determining the gain or loss on the disposition of real estate and held for sale assets.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test (comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill). ASU 2017-04 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard is applied prospectively and may result in a different impairment charge as compared to the existing standard. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 during the fourth quarter of 2017. ASU 2017-04 had no impact on the 2017 annual impairment test. Refer to “ Note 3 Goodwill ” for discussion regarding goodwill and “ Note 9 – Fair Value Measures ” regarding the annual goodwill impairment test.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASU 2017-05”), which clarifies the following: 1) nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty; 2) an entity should allocate consideration to each distinct asset by applying the guidance in Topic 606 on allocating the transaction price to performance obligations; and 3) requires entities to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial sale transaction when it (a) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset in accordance with Subtopic 810 and (b) transfers control of the asset in accordance with Topic 606. The adoption of this standard will result in higher gains on the sale of partial real estate interests, including contributions of nonfinancial assets to a joint venture or other noncontrolling investee, due to recognizing the full gain when the derecognition criteria are met and recording the retained noncontrolling interest at its fair value. ASU 2017-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard is applied prospectively to sales of nonfinancial assets on or after the adoption date. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-09 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The standard is applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-09 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The targeted amendments in this ASU help simplify certain aspects of hedge accounting and result in a more accurate portrayal of the economics of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. This ASU applies to the Company’s interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges. Upon adoption of this ASU, all changes in the fair value of highly effective cash flow hedges will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income rather than recognized directly in earnings. Under current U.S. GAAP, the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedges is recognized directly in earnings. This eliminates the requirement to separately measure and disclose ineffectiveness for qualifying cash flow hedges. ASU 2017-12 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The ASU is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

F-29

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 3 Goodwill
In connection with prior mergers, the Company recorded goodwill as a result of the merger consideration exceeding the net assets acquired. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the carrying value of goodwill was $1.3 billion . During the year ended December 31, 2017 , one property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 was classified as held and used, resulting in an increase to the goodwill allocated to the real estate investment reporting unit of $0.4 million . During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company allocated $73.2 million of goodwill to dispositions and held for sale assets, which included $2.3 million of goodwill allocated to the cost basis of two properties foreclosed upon as discussed in Note 10 – Debt . The allocated goodwill of $73.2 million was included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The analysis performed for the annual goodwill tests during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 resulted in no impairment charges. See Note 9 – Fair Value Measures for a discussion of the Company’s fair value measurements regarding goodwill. Goodwill related to discontinued operations is discussed in Note 5 — Discontinued Operations .
Note 4 – Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles
Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company acquired controlling financial interests in 88 commercial properties and three land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million (the “2017 Acquisitions”), which includes $3.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized in accordance with ASU 2017-01 and includes 22 properties acquired in a nonmonetary exchange discussed below. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, costs related to property acquisitions were expensed as incurred. During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company acquired a controlling interest in eight commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $100.2 million (the “2016 Acquisitions”). During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company acquired 16 commercial properties and nine land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $36.3 million (the “2015 Acquisitions”).
The following table presents the allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the periods presented (in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Real estate investments, at cost:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land
 
$
110,634

 
$
23,187

 
$
5,051

Buildings, fixtures and improvements
 
523,445

 
67,865

 
28,643

Total tangible assets
 
634,079

 
91,052

 
33,694

Acquired intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
In-place leases and other intangibles (1)
 
105,940

 
9,613

 
2,580

Above-market leases  (2)
 
10,445

 

 
153

Assumed intangible liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Below-market leases (3)
 
(1,680
)
 
(471
)
 
(108
)
Total purchase price of assets acquired
 
$
748,784

 
$
100,194

 
$
36,319

____________________________________
(1)
The weighted average amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles is 15.8 years , 13.8 years and 11.0 years for 2017 Acquisitions, 2016 Acquisitions and 2015 Acquisitions, respectively.
(2)
The weighted average amortization period for acquired above-market leases is 18.0 years and 14.1 years for 2017 Acquisitions and 2015 Acquisitions, respectively. There were no acquired above-market leases during the year ended December 31, 2016 .
(3)
The weighted average amortization period for acquired intangible lease liabilities is 13.8 years , 10.0 years and 15.0 years for 2017 Acquisitions, 2016 Acquisitions and 2015 Acquisitions, respectively.

F-30

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The Company has not included pro forma information for the Company's 2016 Acquisitions or 2015 Acquisitions, which were acquired prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 and met the definition of a business combination, as they did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Future Lease Payments
The following table presents future minimum base rent payments due to the Company over the next five years and thereafter. These amounts exclude contingent rent payments, as applicable, that may be collected from certain tenants based on provisions related to sales thresholds and increases in annual rent based on exceeding certain economic indexes among other items (in thousands):
 
 
Future Minimum Operating Lease
Base Rent Payments
 
Future Minimum
Direct Financing Lease Payments
(1)
2018
 
$
1,105,205

 
$
3,016

2019
 
1,082,111

 
2,397

2020
 
1,049,997

 
2,023

2021
 
1,009,474

 
1,899

2022
 
929,909

 
1,809

Thereafter
 
5,950,591

 
2,184

Total
 
$
11,127,287

 
$
13,328

____________________________________
(1)
29 properties are subject to direct financing leases and, therefore, revenue is recognized as direct financing lease income on the discounted cash flows of the lease payments. Amounts reflected are the minimum base rental cash payments due to the Company under the lease agreements on these respective properties.
Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company disposed of 137 properties, including one property owned by a consolidated joint venture, six properties transferred to the lender in either a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction as discussed in Note 10 – Debt , and 15 properties disposed of in connection with the nonmonetary exchange discussed below, for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9 million , of which our share was $574.4 million after the profit participation payments related to the disposition of 31 Red Lobster properties and the consolidated joint venture partner’s share of the sales price. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $445.5 million after a mortgage loan assumption of $66.0 million and closing costs. Additionally, the Company’s tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 included $1.7 million of Canadian tax on the gain on sale of certain Canadian properties. The Company recorded a gain of $64.7 million related to the sales which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company disposed of 301 properties, for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.08 billion , of which our share was  $1.04 billion  after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 70 Red Lobsters. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $958.4 million after a mortgage loan assumption of $55.0 million and closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $45.7 million , which included $67.8 million of goodwill allocated to the cost basis of such properties, which is included in  gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company also disposed of one property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture for a gross sales price of $113.5 million , of which our share was $102.1 million based on our ownership interest in the joint venture, resulting in proceeds of $42.3 million after debt repayments of $57.0 million and closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $10.2 million related to the sale, which is included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company disposed of 228 properties, including two properties owned by consolidated joint ventures, for an aggregate sales price of $1.4 billion , resulting in consolidated proceeds of $966.1 million after mortgage loan assumptions and closing costs. The Company recorded a loss of $69.1 million related to the sales, which included $96.7 million of goodwill allocated in the cost basis of such properties. The Company’s loss on the sales is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

F-31

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company also disposed of its interest in one consolidated joint venture, whose only assets consisted of investments in  three  Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, for an aggregate gross sales price of $77.5 million , of which the Company’s share was $69.8 million based on its ownership interest, resulting in consolidated proceeds of $43.0 million after mortgage loan repayment and closing costs. The mortgage loan obligation of the consolidated joint venture was held by an unconsolidated entity. The Company recorded a gain of $6.7 million related to the sale of the consolidated joint venture, which is included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2017 , there were 30 properties classified as held for sale with a carrying value of $38.3 million , included in assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet which are expected to be sold in the next 12 months as part of the Company’s portfolio management strategy. As of December 31, 2016 , there were 11 properties classified as held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company recorded a loss of $3.1 million related to held for sale properties. No goodwill was allocated to the cost basis of any additional properties classified as held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2017 . During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded a loss of $0.2 million related to properties classified as held for sale during the respective period, which included $3.2 million of goodwill allocated to the cost basis of such properties. The loss on properties held for sale is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Intangible Lease Assets and Liabilities
Intangible lease assets and liabilities of the Company consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands, except weighted-average useful life):
 
 
Weighted-Average Useful Life
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Intangible lease assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $599,680 and $494,131, respectively
 
15.2
 
$
1,091,433

 
$
1,192,756

Leasing commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $2,902 and $1,836, respectively
 
10.6
 
13,876

 
10,231

Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of accumulated amortization of $88,335 and $69,670, respectively
 
16.3
 
241,449

 
275,897

Total intangible lease assets, net
 
 
 
$
1,346,758

 
$
1,478,884

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible lease liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $73,916 and $56,891, respectively
 
18.7
 
$
198,551

 
$
224,023

The following table provides the projected amortization expense and adjustments to rental income related to the intangible lease assets and liabilities for the next five years as of December 31, 2017 (amounts in thousands) :
 
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
In-place leases and other intangibles:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total projected to be included in amortization expense
 
$
135,212

 
$
125,701

 
$
118,390

 
$
110,425

 
$
95,990

Leasing commissions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total projected to be included in amortization expense
 
1,186

 
1,172

 
1,150

 
1,112

 
1,056

Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total projected to be deducted from rental income
 
23,773

 
22,039

 
21,625

 
21,197

 
20,383

Below-market lease liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total projected to be included in rental income
 
19,097

 
18,392

 
17,244

 
16,045

 
15,201


F-32

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Nonmonetary Exchange
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company completed a nonmonetary exchange through the simultaneous acquisition of 22 Bob Evans properties and disposition of 15 Red Lobster properties. Pursuant to Nonmonetary Transactions, ASC (Topic 845), the cost of a nonmonetary asset acquired in exchange for another nonmonetary asset is the fair value of the asset surrendered to obtain the acquired nonmonetary asset, and a gain or loss should be recognized on the exchange. The fair value of the asset received should be used to measure the cost if the fair value of the asset received is more reliable than the fair value of the asset surrendered. The Company estimated the fair value of the Bob Evans and Red Lobster properties using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach and concluded that the fair value was $50.1 million . As the fair value of the assets received exceeded the book value of the assets surrendered, the Company recorded a gain of $7.4 million , which is included in  gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Impairment of Real Estate Investments
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable.
As part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures and considering the factors discussed regarding the Company’s policies on real estate impairment mentioned in  Note 2 –   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , real estate assets and an investment in a property subject to a direct financing lease with carrying values totaling $161.9 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to their estimated fair values of $111.4 million resulting in impairment charges of $50.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 . The majority of the 2017 impairment charges relate to certain office, restaurant and other properties that, during 2017, management identified for potential sale or determined, based on discussions with the current tenants, will not be re-leased.
During the  year ended December 31, 2016 , a majority of the impairment charges related to properties identified by management for potential sale as part of its portfolio management strategy to reduce exposure to office properties. Additionally, a tenant of  59  restaurants filed for bankruptcy. As part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures and considering the factors mentioned above, real estate assets with carrying values totaling  $668.2 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to their estimated fair values of $485.4 million , resulting in impairment charges of $182.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 .
During the year ended December 31, 2015 , real estate assets with carrying value totaling $340.1 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying value was reduced to their estimated fair value of $248.3 million , resulting in impairment charges of $91.8 million .
Consolidated Joint Ventures
The Company had an interest in one joint venture that owned one property as of December 31, 2017 and had total assets of $33.7 million , of which $30.7 million were real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 2016 , the Company had interests in two joint ventures that owned two properties and had total assets of $57.0 million , of which $50.8 million were real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , one property was secured by a mortgage note payable of $14.9 million and $11.6 million , respectively, which was non-recourse to the Company. The Company has the ability to control operating and financial policies of the consolidated joint ventures. There are restrictions on the use of these assets as the Company would generally be required to obtain the approval of each partner (the “Partner”) in accordance with the joint venture agreement for any major transactions. The Company and each Partner are subject to the provisions of each joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
The Partners’ share of the aggregate consolidated joint ventures’ loss was $0.2 million and $14,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. The Partners’ share of the aggregate consolidated joint ventures’ income was $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 . One joint venture disposed of its property during the year ended December 31, 2017 and the Company disposed of its interest in three consolidated joint ventures during the year ended December 31, 2015 , which included one consolidated joint venture, whose only assets were investments in three Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (as defined below).

F-33

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements (the “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures”) consisted of interests in two joint ventures that each owned one property as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company owned aggregate equity investments of $39.5 million and $41.3 million , respectively, in the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. The Company accounts for its investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in earnings and distributions from the joint ventures. As of December 31, 2017 , the Company’s maximum exposure to risk was $39.5 million , the carrying value of the investments, which is presented in investment in unconsolidated entities in the consolidated balance sheet. The Unconsolidated Joint Ventures had total debt outstanding of $20.4 million as of December 31, 2017 , none of which is recourse to the Company, as discussed in Note 10 – Debt . The Company and the respective unconsolidated joint venture partners are subject to the provisions of the applicable joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recognized $3.3 millions , $0.9 million and $2.3 million of net income, respectively, from the unconsolidated joint ventures.
The following is a summary of the Company’s percentage ownership and carrying amount related to each of the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Carrying Amount of Investment (2)
Name of Joint Venture
 
 Partner
 
Ownership % (1)
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Cole/Mosaic JV South Elgin IL, LLC
 
Affiliate of Mosaic Properties and Development, LLC
 
50%
 
$
5,382

 
$
5,891

Cole/Faison JV Bethlehem GA, LLC
 
Faison-Winder Investors, LLC
 
90%
 
34,138

 
35,438

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
39,520

 
$
41,329

_______________________________________________
(1)
The Company’s ownership interest in this table reflects its legal ownership interest. Legal ownership may, at times, not equal the Company’s economic interest in the listed properties because of various provisions in certain joint venture agreements regarding distributions of cash flow based on capital account balances, allocations of profits and losses and payments of preferred returns. As a result, the Company’s actual economic interest (as distinct from its legal ownership interest) in certain of the properties could fluctuate from time to time and may not wholly align with its legal ownership interests.
(2)
The total carrying amount of the investments was greater than the underlying equity in net assets by $8.6 million and $6.4 million as of December 31, 2017 . and December 31, 2016 , respectively. This difference relates to a purchase price allocation of goodwill and a step up in fair value of the investment assets acquired in connection with mergers. The step up in fair value was allocated to the individual investment assets and is being amortized in accordance with the Company’s depreciation policy.

F-34

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)


Note 5 — Discontinued Operations
On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCA and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries to the Cole Purchaser for approximately $120.0 million paid in cash at closing, subject to customary adjustments to reflect the operation of CCA and such subsidiaries prior to closing. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. At closing, the Company entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with the Cole Purchaser pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole Purchaser and the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support, over the next year. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Company will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided. The Company could also receive additional fees over the next six years if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Carrying amount of major classes of assets included in discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
Cash
 
$
2,198

 
$
2,973

Intangible assets, net (1)
 
9,892

 
24,383

Other assets, net (2)
 
6,975

 
16,626

Goodwill (3)
 
124,812

 
124,812

Due from Cole REITs, net
 
1,284

 
5,445

Loss recognized on classification as held for sale  (4)
 
(19,509
)
 

Assets related to discontinued operations, net
 
125,652

 
174,239

 
 
 
 
 
Real estate assets held for sale, net (5)
 
38,347

 
38,928

Assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net
 
$
163,999

 
$
213,167

 
 
 
 
 
Carrying amount of major classes of liabilities included in discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
$
14,269

 
$
11,276

Other liabilities
 
1,512

 
68

Due to Cole REITs
 
100

 

Liabilities related to discontinued operations
 
$
15,881

 
$
11,344

___________________________________
(1)
The intangible assets consisted of management and advisory contracts that the Company had with certain Cole REITs. Accumulated amortization was $44.1 million and $29.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.
(2)
Includes program development costs of $3.3 million and $3.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively, which were net of reserves of $7.6 million and $31.7 million , respectively.
(3)
The Company performed the annual goodwill test using the $120.0 million cash proceeds provided for under the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement, plus the estimated fair value of the Net Revenue Payments and determined the carrying amount exceeded the estimated fair value. As such, no goodwill impairment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017 .
(4)
The Company recognized a loss of $20.0 million on classification of the discontinued operations as held for sale, of which $0.5 million represents estimated costs to sell that were subsequently accrued in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2017. In determining the loss recognized on classification as held for sale, the Company elected to account for the future Net Revenue Payments as a gain contingency. Under this approach, the Company will not recognize any Net Revenue Payments until realized.
(5)
Real estate assets held for sale are not included in assets related to discontinued operations.







F-35

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following is a summary of the financial information and cash flows for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
Revenues:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Offering-related fees and reimbursements
 
$
16,096

 
$
36,526

 
$
24,412

Transaction service fees and reimbursements
 
13,929

 
12,533

 
25,256

Management fees and reimbursements
 
76,214

 
68,686

 
58,793

Total revenues
 
$
106,239

 
$
117,745

 
$
108,461

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 

Cole Capital reallowed fees and commissions
 
9,879

 
23,174

 
16,195

Transaction costs
 
3,802

 

 

General and administrative
 
63,783

 
82,558

 
79,602

Amortization of intangible assets
 
14,490

 
26,148

 
25,884

Goodwill and intangible asset impairments
 

 
120,931

 
213,339

Total operating expenses
 
91,954

 
252,811

 
335,020

Operating income (loss)
 
14,285

 
(135,066
)
 
(226,559
)
Other income (expense), net
 
464

 
292

 
1,167

Loss recognized on classification as held for sale
 
(20,027
)
 

 

Loss before taxes
 
(5,278
)
 
(134,774
)
 
(225,392
)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
 
(13,839
)
 
10,837

 
40,892

Loss from discontinued operations
 
$
(19,117
)
 
$
(123,937
)
 
$
(184,500
)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows related to discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flows from operating activities
 
$
33,232

 
$
35,251

 
$
31,431

Cash flows from investing activities
 
$

 
$

 
$

Income Taxes
Cole Capital’s business, substantially all of which was conducted through a TRS, recognized a provision of $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and a benefit of $10.8 million and $40.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-36

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table presents the reconciliation of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Loss before taxes
 
$
(5,278
)
 
$
(134,774
)
 
$
(225,392
)
Less: Income from non-taxable entities
 
(9,523
)
 
(9,008
)
 
(8,440
)
Loss attributable to taxable subsidiaries before income taxes
 
$
(14,801
)
 
$
(143,782
)
 
$
(233,832
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal provision at statutory rate (35%)
 
(5,180
)
 
(50,324
)
 
(81,841
)
Impairment of goodwill
 

 
42,327

 
48,880

Nondeductible portion of transaction costs and loss recognized on classification as held for sale
 
8,283

 

 

Impact of change in federal tax rate
 
3,481

 

 

Impact of valuation allowance
 
6,165

 

 

State income taxes and other
 
1,090

 
(2,840
)
 
(7,931
)
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes - Cole Capital
 
$
13,839

 
$
(10,837
)
 
$
(40,892
)
The following table presents the components of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Current
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
$
(120
)
 
$
2,244

 
$
9,058

State
 
602

 
(2,762
)
 
2,110

Total current provision for (benefit from) income taxes
 
482

 
(518
)
 
11,168

Deferred
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
12,016

 
(9,021
)
 
(45,255
)
State
 
1,341

 
(1,298
)
 
(6,805
)
Total deferred provision for (benefit from) income taxes
 
13,357

 
(10,319
)
 
(52,060
)
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes - Cole Capital
 
$
13,839

 
$
(10,837
)
 
$
(40,892
)
The components of the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of  December 31, 2017 and 2016 which are included in assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Intangible assets
 
$
(1,590
)
 
$
(7,858
)
 
Accrued compensation
 
1,253

 
6,163

 
Fixed assets
 
(1,568
)
 
(3,155
)
 
Product development costs
 
1,680

 
11,668

 
Equity-based compensation
 
4,772

 
4,249

 
Other
 
555

 
1,227

 
Total net deferred tax asset
 
5,102

 
12,294

 
Less: valuation allowance
 
(6,165
)
 

 
Net deferred tax (liability) asset
 
$
(1,063
)
 
$
12,294

 


F-37

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 6 –   Investment Securities, at Fair Value
Investment securities are considered available-for-sale and, therefore, increases or decreases in the fair value of these investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of equity in the consolidated balance sheets unless the securities are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired at which time the losses are reclassified to expense.
The following tables detail the unrealized gains and losses on investment securities as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
CMBS
 
$
43,006

 
$
895

 
$
(2,927
)
 
$
40,974

 
 
December 31, 2016

 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
CMBS
 
$
48,297

 
$
1,248

 
$
(2,330
)
 
$
47,215

As of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company owned eight CMBS with an estimated aggregate fair value of $41.0 million and $47.2 million , respectively. The Company generally receives monthly payments of principal and interest on the CMBS. As of December 31, 2017 , the Company earned interest on the CMBS at rates ranging between 5.9% and 9.0% . As of December 31, 2017 , the fair value of six CMBS were below their amortized cost. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers a variety of factors, including: (i) whether the Company has the intent to sell the security, (ii) whether the Company expects to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value, and (iii) whether the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The Company believes that none of the unrealized losses on investment securities are other-than-temporary as management expects the Company will fully recover the entire amortized cost basis of all securities. As of  December 31, 2017 , the Company had no other-than-temporary impairment losses.
During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company recorded a $0.1 million  gain on the sale of investment securities, which is included in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  No such gain was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016 .
The scheduled maturity of the Company’s CMBS as of December 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Due within one year
 
$

 
$

Due after one year through five years
 
17,895

 
18,445

Due after five years through 10 years
 
12,053

 
9,156

Due after 10 years
 
13,058

 
13,373

Total
 
$
43,006


$
40,974

Note 7 – Mortgage Notes Receivable
As of December 31, 2017 , the Company owned eight mortgage notes receivable with a weighted-average interest rate of 6.2% and weighted-average years to maturity of 12.6 years. During the  year ended December 31, 2017 one mortgage note with a carrying value of  $1.5 million at repayment was paid in full prior to the maturity date resulting in a $0.1 million gain, which is included in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The following table details the mortgage notes receivable as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Outstanding Balance
 
Carrying Value
 
Interest Rate Range
 
Maturity Date Range
$
22,496

 
$
20,294

 
5.9
%
6.8%
 
December 2026
January 2033

F-38

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The Company’s mortgage notes receivable are comprised primarily of fully-amortizing or nearly fully-amortizing first mortgage loans. The Company has one mortgage note receivable where the Company does not receive monthly payments of principal and interest but rather the interest is capitalized into the outstanding balance that is due at maturity. The mortgage notes receivable are primarily on commercial real estate, each leased to a single tenant. Therefore, the Company’s monitoring of the credit quality of its mortgage notes receivable is focused primarily on an analysis of the tenant, including review of tenant quality and ratings, trends in the tenant’s industry and general economic conditions and an analysis of measures of collateral coverage, such as an estimate of the loan-to-value ratio (principal amount outstanding divided by the estimated value of the property) and its remaining term until maturity.
The following table summarizes the scheduled aggregate principal payments due to the Company on the mortgage notes receivable subsequent to December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
 
 
Outstanding Balance
Due within one year
 
$
930

Due after one year through five years
 
4,422

Due after five years through 10 years
 
7,089

Due after 10 years (1)
 
13,837

Total
 
$
26,278

____________________________________
(1)
Includes additional $3.8 million of interest that will be capitalized into the outstanding balance of the mortgage note receivable subsequent to December 31, 2017 .
Unsecured Note Reserve
During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company assessed the collectability of an unsecured note held with an affiliate of the Former Manager after the December debt service payment was not paid. The Company assessed the liquidity of the borrower, the lien position of the note and the other obligations of the borrower. Based on the analysis, the Company concluded that it was unlikely that the unsecured note will be repaid and recorded a reserve for loan loss equal to the $15.3 million carrying value of the note for the three months ended December 31, 2015 . No principal or interest payments have been received relating to the unsecured note during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 .
Note 8 – Rent and Tenant Receivables and Other Assets, Net
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Accounts receivable, net  (1)
 
$
36,921

 
$
49,114

Straight-line rent receivable, net (2)
 
230,529

 
201,585

Deferred costs, net (3)
 
5,746

 
16,154

Prepaid expenses
 
6,493

 
6,452

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net (4)
 
12,089

 
14,702

Restricted escrow deposits
 
4,995

 
5,741

Income tax receivable
 
3,213

 
18,045

Interest rate swap assets, at fair value
 
627

 
199

Other assets, net (5)
 
4,376

 
2,313

Total
 
$
304,989


$
314,305

___________________________________
(1)
Allowance for doubtful accounts included in accounts receivable, net was $6.3 million and $6.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.
(2)
Allowance for doubtful accounts included in straight-line rent receivable, net was $2.0 million as of December 31, 2017 . No such allowance was included in the straight-line rent receivable at December 31, 2016 .
(3)
Amortization expense for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facility totaled $10.4 million , $10.4 million and $10.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Accumulated amortization for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facility was $40.3 million and $29.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.
(4)
Amortization expense for leasehold improvements totaled $1.2 million , $2.3 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and

F-39

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

2015 , respectively, inclusive of write offs of $1.0 million  for the year ended December 31, 2016 . Accumulated amortization was $4.7 million and $3.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. Depreciation expense for property and equipment totaled $1.8 million , $3.4 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , respectively, inclusive of write offs of $0.6 million and $1.2 million  for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.
(5)
Net of $1.8 million and  $1.6 million  of interest receivable reserves as of  December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .
Note 9 – Fair Value Measures
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. U.S. GAAP guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended December 31, 2017 . The Company expects that changes in classifications between levels will be infrequent.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based on market rates of the Company’s positions and other observable interest rates as discussed in Note 6 –   Investment Securities, at Fair Value and Note 11 –   Derivatives and Hedging Activities , as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall (in thousands):


Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Balance as of December 31, 2017
Assets:








CMBS
 
$

 
$

 
$
40,974

 
$
40,974

Derivative assets


 
627

 


627

Total assets
 
$

 
$
627

 
$
40,974

 
$
41,601




Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Balance as of December 31, 2016
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CMBS
 
$

 
$

 
$
47,215

 
$
47,215

Derivative assets
 

 
199

 

 
199

Total assets
 
$

 
$
199

 
$
47,215

 
$
47,414

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities
 
$

 
$
(3,547
)
 
$

 
$
(3,547
)
CMBS – The Company’s CMBS are carried at fair value and are valued using Level 3 inputs. The Company used estimated non-binding quoted market prices from the trading desks of financial institutions that are dealers in such securities for similar CMBS tranches that actively participate in the CMBS market. Broker quotes are only indicative of fair value and may not necessarily represent what the Company would receive in an actual trade for the applicable instrument. Management determines that the prices are representative of fair value through its knowledge and experience in the market. The significant unobservable input used in

F-40

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

valuing the CMBS is the discount rate or market yield used to discount the estimated future cash flows expected to be received from the underlying investment, which include both future principal and interest payments. Significant increases or decreases in the discount rate or market yield would result in a decrease or increase in the fair value measurement. The following risks are included in the consideration and selection of discount rates or market yields: risk of default, rating of the investment and comparable company investments.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities The Company’s derivative financial instruments relate to interest rate swaps, discussed in Note 11 –   Derivatives and Hedging Activities . The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2017 , the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, due to affiliates and accounts payable approximate their carrying value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets due to their short-term nature and are classified as Level 1 under the fair value hierarchy.
The following are reconciliations of the changes in assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
CMBS
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017
 
$
47,215

Total gains and losses
 
 
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income, net
 
(951
)
Purchases, issuance, settlements
 
 
Return of principal received
 
(4,388
)
Amortization included in net income, net
 
(902
)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2017
 
$
40,974

 
 
CMBS
Beginning balance, January 1, 2016
 
$
53,304

Total gains and losses
 
 
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive loss, net
 
(2,271
)
Purchases, issuance, settlements
 
 
Return of principal received
 
(4,077
)
Accretion included in net loss, net
 
259

Ending Balance, December 31, 2016
 
$
47,215


F-41

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not reported at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are reported below (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Level
 
Carrying Amount at December 31, 2017
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2017
 
Carrying Amount at December 31, 2016
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2016
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage notes receivable
 
3
 
$
20,294

 
$
28,272

 
$
22,764

 
$
30,460

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities  (1) :
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net
 
2
 
$
2,095,690

 
$
2,144,522

 
$
2,687,739

 
$
2,713,155

Corporate bonds, net
 
2
 
2,848,768

 
2,922,027

 
2,248,063

 
2,273,850

Convertible debt, net
 
2
 
992,218

 
1,012,349

 
987,106

 
1,004,733

Credit facility
 
2
 
185,000

 
185,000

 
500,000

 
500,000

Total liabilities
 
 
 
$
6,121,676

 
$
6,263,898

 
$
6,422,908

 
$
6,491,738

_______________________________________________
(1)
Current and prior period liabilities’ carrying and fair values exclude net deferred financing costs.
Mortgage notes receivable – The fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate loan portfolio is estimated with a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing scheduled cash flows and discount rates estimated by management to approximate market interest rates.
Debt – The fair value is estimated by an independent third party using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on management’s estimates of observable market interest rates. Corporate bonds and convertible debt are valued using quoted market prices in active markets with limited trading volume when available.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.
Real Estate Investments
As discussed in Note 4 – Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles , during the year ended December 31, 2017 , net real estate assets and an investment in a property subject to a direct financing lease representing 69 properties were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values totaling $161.9 million were reduced to their estimated fair value of $111.4 million , resulting in impairment charges of $50.5 million . During the  years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , net real estate assets related to 153 and 202 properties, respectively , with carrying values totaling $668.2 million and $340.1 million , respectively, were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to their estimated fair values of $485.4 million and $248.3 million , respectively, resulting in impairment charges of $182.8 million and $91.8 million , respectively. The Company estimates fair values using Level 3 inputs and using a combined income and market approach, specifically using discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. The evaluation of real estate assets for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain key assumptions, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) capitalization rate; (2) discount rates; (3) number of years property will be held; (4) property operating expenses; and (5) re-leasing assumptions including number of months to re-lease, market rental income and required tenant improvements. There are inherent uncertainties in making these estimates such as market conditions and performance and sustainability of the Company’s tenants. For the Company’s impairment tests for the real estate assets during the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company used a range of discount rates from 7.4% to 7.8% with a weighted-average rate of 7.5% and capitalization rates from 6.9% to 10.0% with a weighted-average rate of 8.0% .

F-42

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table presents the impairment charges by asset class recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Properties impaired
 
69

 
153

 
202

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset classes impaired:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in real estate assets, net
 
$
50,087

 
$
183,240

 
$
88,465

Investment in direct financing leases, net
 
553

 

 
4,020

Below-market lease liabilities, net
 
(92
)
 
(421
)
 
(730
)
Total impairment loss
 
$
50,548

 
$
182,819

 
$
91,755

Goodwill
The Company performed its annual test of the goodwill for impairment and determined an estimated fair value of $15.1 billion , $18.3 billion and $19.7 billion at the 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 measurement dates, respectively, which exceeded the carrying values by 8.1% , 21.0% , and 13.0% respectively. As such, no goodwill impairment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 in income (loss) from continuing operations. If all other assumptions were held constant, increasing the discount rate by 0.5% would decrease the amount that the 2017 fair value exceeds the 2017 carrying value from $1.1 billion to $385.0 million .

The Company estimated the fair value using both the income and market approach in evaluating goodwill for impairment. The assumptions utilized in the income approach include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates, future cash flows and discount rates. The assumptions utilized in the market approach include, but are not limited to, future cash flows, the selection of comparable companies and measures of operating results and pricing multiples. AFFO multiples for market comparable companies were used to estimate the fair value by applying those multiples to the projected financial information prepared by management. The uncertainties associated with the fair value assumptions for the goodwill are the same as the uncertainties for real estate assets.

F-43

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 10 – Debt
As of December 31, 2017 , the Company had $6.1 billion of debt outstanding, including net premiums and net deferred financing costs, with a weighted-average years to maturity of 4.3 years and a weighted-average interest rate of 4.2% . The following table summarizes the carrying value of debt as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and the debt activity for the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2016
 
Debt Issuances
 
Repayments, Extinguishment and Assumptions
 
Accretion and Amortization
 
Balance as of December 31, 2017
 
Mortgage notes payable:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding balance
 
$
2,629,949

 
$
4,652

 
$
(563,563
)

$

 
$
2,071,038

(1)  
 
Net premiums (2)
 
36,751

 

 
(526
)
 
(11,573
)
 
24,652

 
 
Deferred costs
 
(16,633
)
 
(88
)
 
883

 
2,840

 
(12,998
)
 
Other debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Outstanding balance
 
20,947

 

 
(20,947
)
 

 

 
 
Premium (2)
 
92

 

 
(17
)
 
(75
)
 

 
Mortgages and other debt, net
 
2,671,106


4,564


(584,170
)

(8,808
)

2,082,692

 
Corporate bonds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Outstanding balance
 
2,250,000

 
600,000

 

 

 
2,850,000

 
 
Discount (3)
 
(1,937
)
 

 

 
705

 
(1,232
)
 
 
Deferred costs
 
(21,839
)
 
(9,485
)
 

 
4,050

 
(27,274
)
 
Corporate bonds, net
 
2,226,224


590,515




4,755


2,821,494

 
Convertible debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Outstanding balance
 
1,000,000

 

 

 

 
1,000,000

 
 
Discount (3)
 
(12,894
)
 

 

 
5,112

 
(7,782
)
 
 
Deferred costs
 
(13,766
)
 

 

 
5,806

 
(7,960
)
 
Convertible debt, net
 
973,340






10,918


984,258

 
Credit facility:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Outstanding balance
 
500,000

 
329,000

 
(644,000
)
 

 
185,000

 
 
Deferred costs (4)
 
(3,422
)
 

 
2,030

 
1,392

 

 
Credit facility, net
 
496,578


329,000


(641,970
)

1,392


185,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Total debt
 
$
6,367,248


$
924,079


$
(1,226,140
)

$
8,257


$
6,073,444

 
____________________________________
(1)
Includes $16.2 million related to one mortgage note payable in default.
(2)
Net premiums on mortgage notes payable and other debt were recorded upon the assumption of the respective debt instruments in relation to the various mergers and acquisitions. Amortization of these net premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(3)
Discounts on the corporate bonds and convertible debt were recorded based upon the fair value of the respective debt instruments as of the respective issuance dates. Amortization of these discounts is recorded as an increase to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(4)
Deferred costs relate to the term portion of the credit facility, which was repaid during the year ended December 31, 2017 .

F-44

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Mortgage Notes Payable
The Company’s mortgage notes payable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Encumbered Properties
 
Gross Carrying Value of Collateralized Properties (1)
 
Outstanding Balance
 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate (6)
 
Weighted-Average Years to Maturity (5)
Fixed-rate debt (3)
 
471

 
$
4,119,850

 
$
2,056,097

 
4.92
%
 
4.1
Variable-rate debt
 
1

 
32,886

 
14,941

 
4.75
%
(2)  
0.6
Total (4)
 
472

 
$
4,152,736

 
$
2,071,038

 
4.92
%
 
4.1
____________________________________
(1)
Gross carrying value is gross real estate assets, including investment in direct financing leases, net of gross real estate liabilities.
(2)
Weighted-average interest rate for variable-rate debt represents the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2017 .
(3)
Includes $78.9 million of variable-rate debt fixed by way of interest rate swap arrangements. 
(4)
The table above does not include the loan amount associated with an Unconsolidated Joint Venture of  $20.4 million , none  of which is recourse to the Company. The loan has a secured fixed rate of 5.20% and a maturity of  July 2021 .
(5)
Weighted average years remaining to maturity is computed using the anticipated repayment date as specified in each loan agreement, where applicable.
(6)
Weighted average interest rate is computed using the interest rate in effect until the anticipated repayment date. Should the loan not be repaid at the anticipated repayment date, the applicable interest rate shall increase as specified in the respective loan agreement until the extended maturity date.
The Company’s mortgage loan agreements generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios). The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. At December 31, 2017 , except for the loan in default described below, the Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the Company repaid mortgage notes payable resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million in each year, due to the write-off of unamortized premiums, net of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties, which are included in (loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2017 , the Company had $16.2 million related to one outstanding mortgage note payable in default. The Company is engaged with the servicer to determine a method of settlement.
On August 31, 2017, the Company entered into a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement with the lender of a mortgage loan secured by one property, with an outstanding balance of $41.6 million on the date of agreement and conveyed its interest in the property to satisfy the mortgage loan. As a result of the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, the Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of  $6.7 million , which is included in  gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net  in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
On August 29, 2017, the Company completed the foreclosure sale of one property secured by a mortgage loan and was relieved of all obligations on the non-recourse loan. On the date of the foreclosure sale, the mortgage loan had an outstanding balance of $20.5 million . The Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of  $4.8 million , which is included in  gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net  in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as a result of the transaction.
On June 27, 2017, the Company entered into a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement with the lender of a mortgage loan, secured by four properties, with an outstanding balance of $38.3 million and conveyed all interests in the properties to satisfy the mortgage loan. As a result of the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, the Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of  $9.0 million , which is included in  gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net  in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
On December 30, 2016, the Company received a notice of default from the lender of a non-recourse loan secured by 16 properties, which had an outstanding balance of $11.6 million on the notice date, due to the Company's intentional non-repayment of the loan balance at maturity. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company cured the default by fully repaying the outstanding loan balance.

F-45

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table summarizes the scheduled aggregate principal repayments due on mortgage notes subsequent to December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
 
 
Total
2018 (1)
 
$
98,450

2019
 
222,789

2020
 
265,186

2021
 
352,770

2022
 
314,839

Thereafter
 
817,004

Total
 
$
2,071,038

___________________________________
(1)
Includes $16.2 million , excluding accrued interest, related to one mortgage note payable in default.
Other Debt
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company repaid the remaining outstanding principal balance of the secured term loan from KBC Bank, N.V. ( the “KBC Loan”).
Corporate Bonds
As of December 31, 2017 , the OP had $2.85 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Senior Notes”) outstanding comprised of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Outstanding Balance December 31, 2017
 
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
2019 Senior Notes
 
$
750,000

 
3.000
%
 
February 6, 2019
2021 Senior Notes
 
400,000

 
4.125
%
 
June 1, 2021
2024 Senior Notes
 
500,000

 
4.600
%
 
February 6, 2024
2026 Senior Notes
 
600,000

 
4.875
%
 
June 1, 2026
2027 Senior Notes
 
600,000

 
3.950
%
 
August 15, 2027
Total balance and weighted-average interest rate
 
$
2,850,000

 
4.033
%
 
 
On August 11, 2017, the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 3.950% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Senior Notes”) (the offering of the 2027 Senior Notes, the “2017 Bond Offering”).
On June 2, 2016, the Company closed its senior note offering, consisting of (i) $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% Senior Notes due June 1, 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) and (ii) $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due June 1, 2026 (the “2026 Senior Notes”) (the offering of the 2021 Senior Notes, collectively with the 2026 Senior Notes.
On July 5, 2016, the Company redeemed $1.3 billion aggregate principal amount of 2.000% senior notes due 2017 (the “2017 Senior Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon and the required make-whole premium. Upon consummation of these transactions, the Company had no 2017 Senior Notes outstanding. The Company recorded a loss related to the early extinguishment of $13.2 million which is included in (loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Senior Notes are guaranteed by the General Partner. The OP may redeem all or a part of any series of the Senior Notes at any time, at its option, for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Senior Notes. If the redemption date is 30 or fewer days prior to the maturity date with respect to the 2019 Senior Notes and the 2021 Senior Notes or is 90 or fewer days prior to the maturity date with respect to the 2024 Senior Notes, the 2026 Senior Notes and the 2027 Senior Notes, the redemption price will equal 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes of the applicable series to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. The Senior Notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) and are freely transferable.

F-46

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The indenture governing our Senior Notes requires us to maintain financial ratios which include maintaining (i) a maximum limitation on incurrence of total debt less than or equal to 65% of Total Assets (as defined in the indenture), (ii) maximum limitation on incurrence of secured debt less than or equal to 40% of Total Assets (as defined in the indenture), (iii) a minimum debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.5 x and (iv) a minimum unencumbered asset value of at least 150% of the aggregate principal amount of all of the outstanding Unsecured Debt (as defined in the indenture). The Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the Senior Notes as of December 31, 2017 .
Convertible Debt
The following table presents the Company’s $597.5 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2018 (the “2018 Convertible Notes”) and $402.5 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2020 Convertible Notes” and, together with the 2018 Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”) with their respective terms (dollar amounts in thousands). The OP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the General Partner.
 
 
Outstanding Balance (1)
 
Interest Rate

 
Conversion Rate (2)
 
Maturity Date
2018 Convertible Notes
 
$
597,500

 
3.00
%
 
60.5997

 
August 1, 2018
2020 Convertible Notes
 
402,500

 
3.75
%
 
66.7249

 
December 15, 2020
Total balance and weighted-average interest rate
 
$
1,000,000

 
3.30
%
 
 
 
 
____________________________________
(1)
Excludes the carrying value of the conversion options recorded within additional paid-in capital of $28.6 million and the unamortized discount of $7.8 million as of December 31, 2017 . The discount will be amortized over the remaining weighted average term of 1.5 years.
(2)
Conversion rate represents the amount of the General Partner OP Units per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes converted as of December 31, 2017 , as adjusted in accordance with the applicable indentures as a result of cash dividend payments.
The 2018 Convertible Notes may be converted into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof in limited circumstances prior to February 1, 2018 and may be converted into such consideration at any time on or after February 1, 2018. The 2020 Convertible Notes may be converted into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof, in limited circumstances prior to June 15, 2020, and may be converted into such consideration at any time on or after June 15, 2020. There were no changes to the terms of the Convertible Notes and the Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2017 .
Credit Facility
The General Partner, as guarantor, and the OP, as borrower, are parties to an unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) pursuant to a credit agreement, dated as of June 30, 2014, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as administrative agent and other lenders party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”).
As of December 31, 2017 , the Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $185.0 million and allowed for maximum borrowings of $2.3 billion under its revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing availability. The maximum aggregate dollar amount of letters of credit that may be outstanding at any one time under the Credit Facility is $25.0 million . The Operating Partnership used a portion of the proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering discussed above to repay all of the outstanding borrowings, swap termination costs and accrued and unpaid interest, under the Credit Facility’s $0.5 billion term loan facility (the "Credit Facility Term Loan”) on August 11, 2017, resulting in the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $2.0 million , which is included in gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The revolving credit facility generally bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 1.00% to 1.80% or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.80%  (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating). “Base Rate” is defined as the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or a floating rate based on one month LIBOR, determined on a daily basis. The Credit Facility Term Loan generally bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus  1.15% to 2.05% , or Base Rate plus  0.15% to 1.05%  (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating). In addition, the Credit Agreement provides the flexibility for interest rate auctions, pursuant to which, at the Company’s election, the Company may request that lenders make competitive bids to provide revolving loans, which competitive bids may be at pricing levels that differ from the foregoing interest rates.
The Credit Agreement provides for monthly interest payments under the Credit Facility. In the event of default, at the election of a majority of the lenders (or automatically upon a bankruptcy event of default with respect to the OP or the General Partner), the commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility will mature, and payment of any unpaid amounts in respect of the Credit Facility will be accelerated. The Credit Facility terminates on June 30, 2018 , unless extended in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for a one -year extension option, exercisable at the Company’s election and

F-47

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

subject to certain customary conditions, as well as certain customary “amend and extend” provisions. At any time, upon timely notice by the OP and subject to any breakage fees, the OP may prepay borrowings under the Credit Facility (subject to certain limitations applicable to the prepayment of any loans obtained through an interest rate auction, as described above). The OP incurs a fee equal to 0.15% to 0.25% per annum (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating) multiplied by the commitments (whether or not utilized) in respect of the revolving credit facility. In addition, the OP incurs customary administrative agent, letter of credit issuance, letter of credit fronting, extension and other fees.
The Credit Facility requires restrictions on corporate guarantees, as well as the maintenance of financial covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios) and the maintenance of a minimum net worth. The key financial covenants in the Credit Facility, as defined and calculated per the terms of the Credit Agreement, include maintaining (i) a maximum leverage ratio less than or equal to 60% , (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.5 x, (iii) a secured leverage ratio less than or equal to 45% , (iv) a total unencumbered asset value ratio less than or equal to 60% , (v) a minimum tangible net worth covenant of at least $5.5 billion , (vi) a minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratio of at least 1.75 x and (vii) a minimum unencumbered asset value of at least $8.0 billion (up to 30% of which may be comprised of restaurant properties from December 31, 2016 on). The Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the Credit Agreement and is not restricted from accessing any borrowing availability under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017 .
Note 11 –   Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company may use derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, options, floors and other interest rate derivative contracts, to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions. The Company does not intend to utilize derivatives for purposes other than interest rate risk management. The use of derivative financial instruments carries certain risks, including the risk that the counterparties to these contractual arrangements are not able to perform under the agreements. To mitigate this risk, the Company only enters into derivative financial instruments with counterparties with high credit ratings and with major financial institutions with which the Company and its affiliates may also have other financial relationships. The Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable-rate debt. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company reclassified previously unrealized losses of $0.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense as a result of the hedged forecasted transactions affecting earnings. The Company also reclassified unrealized losses of $0.8 million from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense associated with settled interest rate derivatives.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges is recognized directly in earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company recorded a gain of $1.6 million in earnings related to the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded a gain of $2.5 million in such earnings. Earnings related to the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges are included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The ineffectiveness is primarily attributable to the designation of acquired interest rate swaps with a non-zero fair value at inception associated with a prior merger.

F-48

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company terminated six of its interest rate swaps in connection with the early repayment of mortgage loans and borrowings under the Credit Facility Term Loan, as discussed in Note 10 – Debt , and accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive income to earnings as a result of a portion of the hedged forecasted transactions becoming probable not to occur. A gain of $1.1 million was recorded in relation to the acceleration, which is included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $0.3 million will be reclassified from other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 , loans associated with thirteen derivative instruments with an aggregate notional value of  $662.4 million at the respective settlement date, were repaid in full and one derivative previously designated as a cash flow hedge with a notional value of $27.8 million was de-designated as it was not probable the forecasted hedged transaction would occur. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollar amounts in thousands):
Interest Rate Swaps
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Number of Instruments
 

 
14

Notional Amount
 
$

 
$
690,816

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges as well as their classification in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Interest rate swaps
 
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net
 
$

 
$
3

Interest rate swaps
 
Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities
 
$

 
$
(3,547
)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the requirements to be classified as hedging instruments. A gain of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the change in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments was recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded a loss of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 .
As discussed above, during the year ended December 31, 2017 , one derivative previously designated as a cash flow hedge with a notional value of $27.8 million was de-designated as it was not probable the forecasted hedged transaction would occur. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were not designated as qualifying hedging relationships (dollar amounts in thousands):
Interest Rate Swap
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Number of Instruments
 
2

 
1

Notional Amount
 
$
78,949

 
$
51,400

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments not designated as a hedge as well as their classification in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Interest rate swaps
 
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net
 
$
627

 
$
196


F-49

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Tabular Disclosure of Offsetting Derivatives
The table below details a gross presentation, the effects of offsetting and a net presentation of the Company’s derivatives as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands). The net amounts of derivative assets or liabilities can be reconciled to the tabular disclosure of fair value.
 
 
Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
 
 
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
 
Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities
 
Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Financial Instruments
 
Cash Collateral Received
 
Net Amount
December 31, 2017
 
$
627

 
$

 
$

 
$
627

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
627

December 31, 2016
 
$
199

 
$
(3,547
)
 
$

 
$
199

 
$
(3,547
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(3,348
)
Credit Risk Related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision specifying that if the Company either defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
As of December 31, 2017 , the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements and was not in breach of any provisions in these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their aggregate termination value of $0.6 million at December 31, 2017 .
Note 12 Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
Supplemental cash flow information was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Supplemental Disclosures:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
 
$
260,951

 
$
317,170

 
$
343,854

Cash paid for income taxes
 
$
11,280

 
$
20,279

 
$
14,179

Cash received from federal income tax refund
 
$
16,686

 
$

 
$

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accrued capital expenditures and real estate developments
 
$
6,578

 
$
7,701

 
$
1,499

Accrued deferred financing costs
 
$

 
$
3

 
$

Distributions declared and unpaid
 
$
149,768

 
$
149,281

 
$
133,817

Accrued equity issuance costs
 
$

 
$
9

 
$

Mortgage note payable relieved by foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure
 
$
100,388

 
$
38,050

 
$
53,798

Mortgage notes payable assumed in real estate disposition
 
$
66,000

 
$
55,000

 
$
425,021

Real estate investments received from a ground lease expiration
 
$
259

 
$

 
$

Real estate investments received from a property-related legal settlement
 
$
775

 
$

 
$

Nonmonetary Exchanges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments received
 
$
50,204

 
$

 
$

Real estate investments relinquished and gain on disposition
 
$
(47,474
)
 
$

 
$

Rent and tenant receivables, intangible lease liability and other assets, net
 
$
(2,511
)
 
$

 
$


F-50

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 13 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Accrued interest
 
$
47,116

 
$
43,188

Accrued real estate taxes
 
26,131

 
38,433

Accrued legal fees
 
30,854

 
17,827

Accounts payable
 
2,570

 
4,524

Accrued other
 
29,803

 
30,889

Total
 
$
136,474

 
$
134,861

Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings and claims incidental to the ordinary course of its business. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Company, except as follows:
Government Investigations and Litigation Relating to the Audit Committee Investigation
As previously reported, on October 29, 2014, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “October 29 8-K”) reporting the Audit Committee’s conclusion, based on the preliminary findings of its investigation, that certain previously issued consolidated financial statements of the Company, including those included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, and related financial information should no longer be relied upon. The Company also reported that the Audit Committee had based its conclusion on the preliminary findings of its investigation into concerns regarding accounting practices and other matters that were first reported to the Audit Committee in early September 2014 and that the Audit Committee believed that an error in the calculation of adjusted funds from operations for the first quarter of 2014 had been identified but intentionally not corrected when the Company reported its financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. Prior to the filing of the October 29 8-K, the Audit Committee previewed for the SEC the information contained in the filing. Subsequent to that filing, the SEC provided notice that it had commenced a formal investigation and issued subpoenas calling for the production of various documents. In addition, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York contacted counsel for the Audit Committee and counsel for the Company with respect to this matter, and the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts issued a subpoena calling for the production of various documents. The Company has been cooperating with these regulators in their investigations.
In connection with these investigations, on September 8, 2016, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced the filing of criminal charges against the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and former Chief Accounting Officer (the “Criminal Action”), as well as the fact that the former Chief Accounting Officer pleaded guilty to the charges filed. Also on September 8, 2016, the SEC announced the filing of a civil complaint against the same two individuals in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SEC Civil Action”). On June 30, 2017, following a jury trial, the former Chief Financial Officer was convicted of the charges filed. Both the former Chief Accounting Officer and the former Chief Financial Officer have entered into settlement agreements with the SEC resolving the charges brought against them.
As discussed below, the Company and certain of its former officers and directors have been named as defendants in a number of lawsuits filed following the October 29 8-K, including class actions, derivative actions, and individual actions seeking money damages and other relief under the federal securities laws and state laws in both federal and state courts in New York, Maryland and Arizona.

F-51

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Between October 30, 2014 and January 20, 2015, the Company and certain of its former officers and directors, among other individuals and entities, were named as defendants in ten securities class action complaints filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The court consolidated these actions under the caption In re American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Litigation, No. 15-MC-00040 (AKH) (the “SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action”). The plaintiffs filed a second amended class action complaint on December 11, 2015, which asserted claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Certain defendants, including the Company and the OP, filed motions to dismiss the second amended class action complaint (or portions thereof), which were granted in part and denied in part by the court. The Company and the OP answered the second amended class action complaint on July 29, 2016. On September 8, 2016, the court issued an order directing plaintiffs to file a third amended complaint to reflect certain prior rulings by the court. The third amended complaint was filed on September 30, 2016 and the defendants were not required to file new answers. Discovery is ongoing. Plaintiffs in the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action filed a motion for class certification and a hearing on the motion was held on August 24, 2017. On August 31, 2017, the court issued orders granting plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and granting summary judgment to defendants with respect to one of plaintiffs’ claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. The defendants filed petitions seeking leave to appeal the court’s order granting class certification, which were denied on January 24, 2018. A status conference with the court is scheduled for June 11, 2018.
The Company, certain of its former officers and directors, and the OP, among others, have also been named as defendants in additional individual securities fraud actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: Jet Capital Master Fund, L.P. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-307; Twin Securities, Inc. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-1291; HG Vora Special Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-4107; BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08464; PIMCO Funds: PIMCO Diversified Income Fund, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08466; Clearline Capital Partners LP, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08467; Pentwater Equity Opportunities Master Fund Ltd., et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08510; Archer Capital Master Fund, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al, No. 16-cv-05471; Atlas Master Fund et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 16-cv-05475; Eton Park Fund, L.P. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 16-cv-09393; Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, et al, v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al, No. 17-cv-02796; and Fir Tree Capital Opportunity Master Fund, L.P. et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 17-cv-04975 (the “Fir Tree Action”) (collectively, the “Opt-Out Actions”). The Opt-Out Actions assert claims arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities. Discovery in the Opt-Out Actions is being coordinated with discovery in the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action.
On October 27, 2015, the Company and certain of its former officers, among others, were named as defendants in an individual securities fraud action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, captioned Vanguard Specialized Funds, et al. v. VEREIT, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-02157 (the “Vanguard Action”). The Vanguard Action asserts claims arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities. On January 21, 2016, the Company filed a motion to transfer the Vanguard Action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 29, 2016, the court entered an order denying the Company’s motion to transfer and granting in part and denying in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. The Company filed an answer to the complaint on November 4, 2016. Discovery is ongoing and in large part is being coordinated with discovery in the SDNY Consolidated Securities Action.
The Company was also named as a nominal defendant, and certain of its former officers and directors were named as defendants, in shareholder derivative actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: Witchko v. Schorsch, et al., No. 15-cv-06043 (the “Witchko Action”); and Serafin, et al. v. Schorsch, et al., No. 15-cv-08563 (the “Serafin Action”). The court consolidated the Witchko Action and the Serafin Action (together “the SDNY Derivative Action”) and the plaintiffs designated the complaint filed in the Witchko Action as the operative complaint in the SDNY Derivative Action. The SDNY Derivative Action seeks money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, among other claims. On February 12, 2016, the Company and other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the SDNY Derivative Action due to plaintiffs’ failure to plead facts demonstrating that the Board’s decision to refuse plaintiffs’ pre-suit demands was wrongful and not a protected business judgment. On June 9, 2016, the court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s and other defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on June 30, 2016, and the Company and other defendants filed answers to the amended complaint on July 22, 2016. Discovery in the Witchko Action is being coordinated with discovery in the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action.

F-52

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

On December 3, 2015, the Company was named as a nominal defendant and certain of its former officers and directors were named as defendants in a shareholder derivative action filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in Maryland, Frampton v. Schorsch, et al., No. 24-C-15-006269 (the “Frampton Action”). The Frampton Action seeks money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for, among other things, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and contribution and indemnification. By order dated November 4, 2016, the Frampton Action was stayed pending resolution of the SDNY Derivative Action.
On June 10, 2016, the Company was named as a nominal defendant, and certain of its former officers and directors, among others, were named as defendants, in a shareholder derivative action filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kosky v. Schorsch, et al., No. 653093/2016 (the “Kosky Action”). The Kosky Action seeks money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for, among other things, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, negligence, and breach of contract. On October 6, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation staying the Kosky Action until resolution of the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action.
On October 6, 2016, the Company was named as a nominal defendant, and certain of its former officers and directors, among others, were named as defendants, in a shareholder derivative action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, captioned Meloche v. Schorsch, et al., 16-cv-03366 (the “Meloche Action”). An amended complaint was filed on January 17, 2017. The Meloche Action seeks money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and negligence. By order dated May 16, 2017, the Meloche Action was stayed until resolution of the SDNY Derivative Action.
The Company has not reserved amounts for any of the litigation or investigation matters discussed above either because it has not concluded that a loss is probable in the particular matter or because for some matters, it believes that a loss is probable but that any probable loss or reasonably possible range of loss is not reasonably estimable at this time. The Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate a range of reasonably possible loss because these matters involve significant uncertainties, including the complexity of the facts, the legal theories and the nature of the claims, as well as the methodology for determining damages. The ultimate resolution of these matters, the timing and substance of which is unknown, may materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Cole Litigation Matter
In December 2013, Realistic Partners filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company and the then-members of its board of directors in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, captioned Realistic Partners v. American Realty Capital Partners, et al., No. 654468/2013. Cole was later added as a defendant. The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the board of the Company breached its fiduciary duties in connection with the transactions contemplated under the Cole Merger Agreement (in connection with the merger between a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole and Cole Holdings Corporation) and that Cole aided and abetted those breaches. In January 2014, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding settlement of all claims asserted on behalf of the alleged class of the Company’s stockholders. The proposed settlement terms required the Company to make certain additional disclosures related to the Cole Merger, which were included in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on January 17, 2014. The memorandum of understanding also contemplated that the parties would enter into a stipulation of settlement, which would be subject to customary conditions, including confirmatory discovery and court approval following notice to the Company’s stockholders, and provided that the defendants would not object to a payment of up to $625,000 for attorneys’ fees. If the parties enter into a stipulation of settlement, which has not occurred, a hearing will be scheduled at which the court will consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement. There can be no assurance that the parties will enter into a stipulation of settlement, that the court will approve any proposed settlement, or that any eventual settlement will be under the same terms as those contemplated by the memorandum of understanding.

F-53

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Contractual Lease Obligations
The following table reflects the minimum base rent payments due from the Company over the next five years and thereafter for certain ground lease obligations, which are substantially reimbursable by our tenants, and office lease obligations (in thousands):
 
 
Future Minimum Base Rent Payments
 
 
Ground Leases
 
Office Leases
2018
 
$
14,523

 
$
4,394

2019
 
14,467

 
4,359

2020
 
14,350

 
4,389

2021
 
13,721

 
4,368

2022
 
13,935

 
4,419

Thereafter
 
211,514

 
3,995

Total
 
$
282,510

 
$
25,924

Purchase Commitments
Cole Capital enters into purchase and sale agreements and deposits funds into escrow towards the purchase of real estate assets, most of which are expected to be assigned to one of the Cole REITs at or prior to the closing of the respective acquisition. As of December 31, 2017 , Cole Capital was a party to 13 purchase and sale agreements with unaffiliated third-party sellers to purchase a 100% interest in 13 properties, subject to meeting certain criteria, for an aggregate purchase price of $209.0 million , exclusive of closing costs. As of December 31, 2017 , Cole Capital had $4.8 million of property escrow deposits held by escrow agents in connection with these future property acquisitions, which may be forfeited if the transactions are not completed under certain circumstances. Cole Capital will be reimbursed by the assigned Cole REIT for amounts escrowed when the property is assigned to the respective Cole REIT.
Environmental Matters
In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. The Company has not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim, and is not aware of any other environmental condition, in each case, that it believes will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations.
Note 15 –  Equity
Common Stock and General Partner OP Units
The General Partner is authorized to issue up to 1.5 billion shares of Common Stock. As of December 31, 2017 , the General Partner had approximately 974.2 million shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.
Additionally, the Operating Partnership had approximately 974.2 million General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 , corresponding to the General Partner’s outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Common Stock Offerings
On August 10, 2016, the Company issued 69.0 million shares of Common Stock in a public offering for net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering costs, of $702.5 million , which were used in part to repay the 2016 Term Loan and amounts under the Credit Facility. Concurrently, the Operating Partnership issued the General Partner 69.0 million General Partner OP Units.
Common Stock Continuous Offering Program
On September 19, 2016, the Company registered a continuous equity offering program (the “Program”) pursuant to which the Company can offer and sell, from time to time through September 19, 2019 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions, shares of Common Stock with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $750.0 million , through its sales agents. As of December 31, 2017 , no shares of Common Stock have been issued pursuant to the Program.

F-54

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Preferred Stock and Preferred OP Units
Series F Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2017 , there were approximately 42.8 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock (and approximately 42.8 million corresponding General Partner Series F Preferred Units) and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding.
The Series F Preferred Stock pays cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis). The Series F Preferred Stock is not redeemable by the Company before January 3, 2019, the fifth anniversary of the date on which such Series F Preferred Stock was issued (the “Initial Redemption Date”), except under circumstances intended to preserve the General Partner’s status as a REIT for federal and/or state income tax purposes and except upon the occurrence of a change of control. On and after the Initial Redemption Date, the General Partner may, at its option, redeem shares of the Series F Preferred Stock, in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus, subject to exceptions, any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date fixed for redemption. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless the General Partner redeems or otherwise repurchases them or they become convertible and are converted into Common Stock (or, if applicable, alternative consideration). The Series F Preferred Stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “VER PRF”. The Series F Preferred Units contain the same terms as the Series F Preferred Stock.
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nontaxable distributions. Nontaxable distributions will reduce U.S stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares. The following table shows the character of the Series F Preferred Stock distributions paid on a percentage basis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 :
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Ordinary dividends
 
95.0
%
 
95.0
%
 
75.9
%
Nondividend distributions
 
%
 
%
 
%
Capital gain distributions
 
5.0
%
 
5.0
%
 
24.1
%
Total
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
Limited Partner OP Units
As of each December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Operating Partnership had approximately 23.75 million Limited Partner OP Units outstanding.
As of December 31, 2017 , the Company has received redemption requests totaling approximately 13.1 million Limited Partner OP Units from certain affiliates of the Former Manager, which would have been redeemable for a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock. The Company believes it has potential claims against recipients of those OP Units and has engaged in discussions with affiliates of the Former Manager regarding the redemption requests. Pending any resolution, the Company does not currently intend to satisfy any of the redemption requests. In light of the potential claims, since October 15, 2015, the OP has not paid distributions in respect of a substantial portion of the outstanding Limited Partner OP Units when the Common Stock dividends were otherwise paid.
Common Stock Dividends
The Company declared quarterly dividends to stockholders of record each quarter from the third quarter of the year ended December 31, 2015 through the third quarter of the year ended December 31, 2017 of $0.1375 per share of common stock (representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share). The Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of  $0.1375  per share of common stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of $0.55  per share) for the fourth quarter of 2017 on November 7, 2017 to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2017 , which was paid on January 16, 2018 . An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP unit.
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nontaxable distributions. Nontaxable distributions will reduce U.S stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares. The following table shows the character of the common stock distributions paid on a percentage basis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 :

F-55

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Ordinary dividends
 
60.0
%
 
95.0
%
 
75.9
%
Nondividend distributions
 
37.0
%
 
%
 
%
Capital gain distributions
 
3.0
%
 
5.0
%
 
24.1
%
Total
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
Share Repurchase Program
On May 12, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock over the subsequent 12 months, as market conditions warrant (the “Share Repurchase Program”). Repurchases may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, structured or derivative transactions, including accelerated stock repurchase transactions, or other methods of acquiring shares in accordance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements. The Share Repurchase Program does not obligate the Company to make any repurchases at a specific time or in a specific situation. Repurchases are subject to prevailing market conditions, the trading price of the stock, the Company’s financial performance and other conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company repurchased 68,759 shares of Common Stock in multiple open market transactions for $0.5 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program, which are currently deemed to be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Additional shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company under the Share Repurchase Program, if any, will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.
Common Stock Repurchases to Settle Tax Obligations
Under the General Partner’s Equity Plan (defined below), individuals have the option to have the General Partner repurchase shares vesting from awards made under the Equity Plan in order to satisfy the minimum federal and state tax withholding obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the General Partner repurchased 268,550 shares to satisfy the federal and state tax withholding obligations on behalf of employees.
Note 16 – Equity-based Compensation
Equity Plan
The General Partner has adopted an equity plan (the “Equity Plan”), which provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”), restricted stock units (“Restricted Stock Units”), deferred stock units (“Deferred Stock Units”), dividend equivalent rights and other stock-based awards to the General Partner’s and its affiliates’ non-executive directors, officers and other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the General Partner or its affiliates. To date, the General Partner has granted fully vested shares of Common Stock, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock Units under the Equity Plan. Restricted Shares provide for rights identical to those of Common Stock. Restricted Stock Units do not provide for any rights of a common stockholder prior to the vesting of such Restricted Stock Units. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, Restricted Shares are considered issued and outstanding. As is the case when fully vested shares of Common Stock are issued from the Equity Plan, for each Restricted Share awarded under the Equity Plan, the Operating Partnership issues a General Partner OP Unit to the General Partner with identical terms. Upon vesting of Restricted Stock Units or Deferred Stock Units, the Operating Partnership issues a General Partner OP Unit to the General Partner for each share of Common Stock issued as a result of such vesting.
The General Partner has authorized and reserved a total number of shares equal to 10.0% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (on a fully diluted basis assuming the redemption of all OP Units for shares of Common Stock) to be issued at any time under the Equity Plan for equity incentive awards. As of December 31, 2017 , the General Partner had cumulatively awarded under its Equity Plan approximately 4.0 million Restricted Shares, net of the forfeiture of 3.7 million Restricted Shares through that date, 4.2 million Restricted Stock Units, net of the forfeiture/cancellation of 1.2 million Restricted Stock Units through that date, and 0.3 million Deferred Stock Units, collectively representing approximately 8.5 million shares of Common Stock. Accordingly, as of such date, approximately 91.3 million additional shares were available for future issuance.
During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the General Partner awarded 5,634 shares of Common Stock. The fair value of the awards was determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and expensed in full on the grant date. The Company recorded $0.1 million of compensation expense related to the awards for the year ended December 31, 2015 . No such shares of Common Stock were awarded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 .

F-56

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Restricted Shares
The Company has issued Restricted Shares to certain employees and non-executive directors beginning in 2011. In addition, the Company issued Restricted Shares to employees of affiliates of the Former Manager prior to 2015. The fair value of the Restricted Shares granted to employees under the Equity Plan is generally determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and is expensed over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. The fair value of Restricted Shares granted to non-executive directors and employees of affiliates of the Former Manager under the Equity Plan was measured based upon the fair value of goods or services received or the equity instruments granted, whichever was more reliably determinable, and was expensed in full at the date of grant.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recorded $2.0 million , $2.7 million and $3.9 million , respectively, of compensation expense related to the Restricted Shares. As of  December 31, 2017 , there was  $0.7 million  of unrecognized compensation expense related to the Restricted Shares with a weighted-average remaining term of  1.2 years .
The following table details the activity of the Restricted Shares during the year ended December 31, 2017 :
 
 
Restricted Shares
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested shares, December 31, 2015
 
1,239,662

 
$
13.86

Granted
 

 

Vested
 
(586,863
)
 
13.91

Forfeited
 
(90,393
)
 
14.08

Unvested shares, December 31, 2016
 
562,406

 
$
13.78

Granted
 

 

Vested
 
(266,378
)
 
13.55

Forfeited
 
(61,600
)
 
13.98

Unvested shares, December 31, 2017
 
234,428

 
$
13.98

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units
Under the Equity Plan, the Company may award Restricted Stock Units to employees that will vest if the recipient maintains his/her employment over the requisite service period (the “Time-Based Restricted Stock Units”). The fair value of the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units granted to employees under the Equity Plan is generally determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and is expensed over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis, which is generally three years. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recorded $6.3 million , $3.4 million and $1.8 million , respectively, of compensation expense related to the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units. As of  December 31, 2017 , there was  $5.8 million  of unrecognized compensation expense related to the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units with a weighted-average remaining term of  1.7 years .
Deferred Stock Units
The Company may award Deferred Stock Units to non-executive directors under the Equity Plan (the “Deferred Stock Units”). Each Deferred Stock Unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock. The Deferred Stock Units provide for immediate vesting on the grant date and will be settled with Common Stock either on the earlier of the date on which the respective director separates from the Company, dies or the third anniversary of the grant date, or if granted pursuant to the director’s voluntary election to participate in the director’s deferred compensation program, on the date the director separates from the Company (or upon a change of control or death). The fair value of the Deferred Stock Units is determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and is expensed over the requisite service period or on the grant date for awards with no requisite service period. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , the Company recorded approximately $1.0 million of expense related to Deferred Stock Units. During each of the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015 , the Company recorded approximately $0.8 million of expense related to Deferred Stock Units. As of  December 31, 2017 , there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to the Deferred Stock Units.

F-57

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table details the activity of the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock Units during the year ended December 31, 2017 .
 
 
Time-Based Restricted Stock Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
Deferred Stock Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2015
 
589,138

 
$
9.61

 

 
$

Granted
 
736,427

 
7.82

 
87,513

 
9.18

Vested
 
(199,556
)
 
9.52

 
(87,513
)
 
9.18

Forfeited
 
(40,095
)
 
8.68

 

 

Unvested units, December 31, 2016
 
1,085,914

 
$
8.43

 

 
$

Granted
 
673,381

 
8.90

 
127,588

 
8.22

Vested
 
(425,967
)
 
8.61

 
(127,588
)
 
8.22

Forfeited
 
(20,463
)
 
8.54

 

 

Unvested units, December 31, 2017
 
1,312,865

 
$
8.61

 

 
$

Market-Based Restricted Stock Units
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the General Partner awarded Restricted Stock Units to certain employees under the Equity Plan that were contingent upon the Common Stock reaching a certain market price (the “Market-Based Restricted Stock Units”). The Market-Based Restricted Stock Units were contingent upon the closing price of the Common Stock equaling or exceeding $10 per share for 20 consecutive trading days (the “Market Condition”) and the grantee’s continued employment as of such date on which the Market Condition was met. On July 28, 2016,  610,839  Market-Based Restricted Stock Units vested, of which  199,858  shares were withheld to cover grantees’ tax withholding obligations, resulting in  410,981  shares being issued.
The fair value and derived service period of the Market-Based Restricted Stock Units as of their grant date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, which took into account multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the Market Condition. The method required the input of assumptions, including the future dividend yield and expected volatility of the Common Stock. Compensation expense was recognized on a straight-line basis over the derived service period regardless of whether the Market Condition was satisfied, provided that the requisite service condition had been achieved. The Market-Based Restricted Stock Units were fully expensed during the year ended December 31, 2015 ; however, the Company recorded contra-expense due to the forfeiture of such awards. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recorded contra-expense of $0.8 million related to forfeitures and expense of $6.0 million , respectively. There were  no  such expenses related to the Market-Based Restricted Stock Units for the  year ended December 31, 2017 . As of  December 31, 2017 , there was no  unrecognized compensation expense related to the Market-Based Restricted Stock Units.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
The General Partner may award long-term incentive-based Restricted Stock Units (the “LTI Target Awards”) to employees under the Equity Plan. Vesting of the LTI Target Awards is based upon the General Partner’s level of achievement of total stockholder return (“TSR”), including both share price appreciation and Common Stock dividends, as measured equally against a market index and against a peer group generally over a three year period.
The fair value and derived service period of the LTI Target Awards as of their grant date is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation which takes into account multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the required TSR, as outlined in the award agreements. This method requires the input of assumptions, including the future dividend yield, the expected volatility of the Common Stock and the expected volatility of the market index constituents and the peer group. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the derived service period regardless of whether the necessary TSR is attained, provided that the requisite service condition has been achieved. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recorded $7.4 million , $4.6 million and $1.9 million respectively, of expense related to the LTI Target Awards. As of  December 31, 2017 , there was $6.1 million  of unrecognized compensation expense related to the LTI Target Awards with a weighted-average remaining term of  1.7 years . During the year ended December 31, 2017 , 671,712 LTI Target Awards were canceled as a result of the awards not meeting the vesting criteria as of the measurement date.

F-58

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table details the activity of the LTI Target Awards during the year ended December 31, 2017 .
 
Market-Based Restricted Stock Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
LTI Target Awards
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2015
704,804

 
$
8.58

 
731,448

 
$
11.38

Granted

 

 
855,471

 
7.14

Vested
(610,839
)
 
8.58

 
(8,065
)
 
11.44

Forfeited
(93,965
)
 
8.58

 
(56,367
)
 
11.15

Unvested units, December 31, 2016

 
$

 
1,522,487

 
$
9.00

Granted

 

 
726,867

 
8.96

Forfeited or canceled

 

 
(675,125
)
 
11.34

Unvested units, December 31, 2017
$

 
$

 
1,574,229

 
$
7.98

Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements
Cole Capital
The Company was contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis, identifying and making acquisitions and investments on the Cole REITs’ behalf, and recommending to the respective board of directors of each of the Cole REITs an approach for providing investors with liquidity. In addition, the Company was responsible for raising capital for certain Cole REITs, advised them regarding offerings, managed relationships with participating broker-dealers and financial advisors, and provided assistance in connection with compliance matters relating to the offerings. The Company received compensation and reimbursement for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment, management and disposition of their respective assets, as applicable.
As discussed in Note 5 — Discontinued Operations , the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell substantially all of Cole Capital. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. The assets and liabilities transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement and related financial results are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. At closing, the Company entered into the Services Agreement with the Cole Purchaser pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole Purchaser and the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support, over the next year. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Company will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided. The Company could also receive Net Revenue Payments over the next six years if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold, up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
Offering-Related Revenue
The Company generally received a selling commission, dealer manager fee and/or a distribution and stockholder servicing fee based on the gross offering proceeds related to the sale of shares of the Cole REITs’ common stock in their primary offerings. The Company reallowed 100% of selling commissions earned to participating broker-dealers. The Company, in its sole discretion, could reallow all or a portion of its dealer manager and distribution and stockholder servicing fee to such participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement, based on factors such as the volume of shares issued by such participating broker-dealers and the amount of marketing support provided. No selling commissions or dealer manager fees were paid to the Company or other broker-dealers with respect to shares issued under the respective Cole REIT’s distribution reinvestment plan, under which the stockholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares.


F-59

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table shows the offering fee summary information for the Cole REITs conducting offerings as of December 31, 2017 :
 
 
Selling Commissions (1)
 
Dealer Manager Fees (2)
 
Annual Distribution and Stockholder Servicing Fee (2)
 
Open Programs (3)(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CCPT V (5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A Shares
 
7%
 
2%
 
—%
 
Class T Shares (6)
 
3%
 
2%
 
1%
(7)(8)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INAV
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wrap Class Shares
 
—%
 
0.55%
(8)  
—%
 
Advisor Class Shares
 
up to 3.75%
 
0.55%
(8)  
0.5%
(8)  
Institutional Class Shares
 
—%
 
0.25%
(8)  
—%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CCIT III (5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A Shares
 
7%
 
2%
 
—%
 
Class T Shares
 
3%
 
2%
 
1%
(8)  
_______________________________________________
(1)
The Company reallowed 100% of selling commissions to participating broker-dealers during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 .
(2)
The Company could reallow all or a portion of its dealer manager fee and/or distribution and stockholder servicing fee to participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement.
(3)
The Company received selling commissions, an asset-based dealer manager fee and/or an asset-based distribution and stockholder servicing fee, all based on the net asset value for each class of common stock.
(4)
CCIT II closed its offering during the three months ended September 30, 2016. The program’s fee structure was similar to that of CCPT V.
(5)
The maximum amount of the distribution and stockholder servicing fees with respect to sales of Class T shares was 4.0% of the gross offering proceeds for CCPT V and CCIT III. Distribution and stockholder servicing fees continue to be paid after the offering closes if the 4.0% maximum has not been met.
(6)
Commencing on April 29, 2016, CCPT V began offering Class T shares of common stock in addition to the class of shares of common stock previously offered (now referred to as Class A shares).
(7)
During the three months ended December 31, 2016 , the annual distribution and stockholder servicing fee was amended to be 1.0% . Prior to the amendment, the distribution and stockholder servicing fee was 0.8% per annum.
(8)
Fees were accrued daily in the amount of 1/365th of a percentage of the estimated per share NAV and payable monthly in arrears. Distribution and stockholder servicing fees continue to be paid after the offering closes.
Transaction Service Revenue
The Company earned acquisition fees related to the acquisition, development or construction of properties on behalf of certain of the Cole REITs. In addition, the Company was reimbursed for acquisition expenses incurred in the process of acquiring properties up to certain limits per the respective advisory agreement. The Company was not reimbursed for personnel costs in connection with services for which it receives acquisition fees or real estate commissions. In addition, the Company could earn disposition fees related to the sale of one or more properties, including those held indirectly through joint ventures, on behalf of a Cole REIT and other affiliates.

F-60

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table shows the transaction-related fees for the Cole REITs as of December 31, 2017 :
Program
 
Acquisition Fees (1)
 
Disposition Fees
 
Performance Fees (2)
 
Financing Coordination Fee (3)
Open Programs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CCPT V
 
2%
 
1%
 
15%
 
INAV
 
 
 
 
CCIT III
 
2%
 
1%
 
15%
 
1%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Closed Programs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CCIT II
 
2%
 
1%
 
15%
 
CCPT IV
 
2%
 
1%
 
15%
 
_______________________________________________
(1)
Percent was taken on gross purchase price.
(2)
Performance fee was paid only under the following circumstances: (i) if shares are listed on a national securities exchange; (ii) if the respective Cole REIT is sold or the assets are liquidated; or (iii) upon termination of the advisory agreement. In connection with such events, the performance fee will only be earned upon the return to investors of their net capital invested and a 6% annual cumulative, non-compounded return ( 8% in the case of CCIT II and CCPT IV).
(3)
Financing coordination fee payable for services in connection with the origination, assumption, or refinancing of any debt (other than loans advanced by the Company) to acquire properties or make other permitted investments.
Management Service Revenue
The Company earned advisory and asset and property management fees from certain Cole REITs. The Company was also reimbursed for expenses incurred in providing advisory and asset and property management services, subject to certain limitations. In addition, the Company earned a performance fee relating to INAV for any year in which the total return on stockholders’ capital exceeded 6% per annum on a calendar year basis.
The following table shows the management fees for the Cole REITs as of December 31, 2017 :
Program
 
Asset Management / Advisory Fees (1)
 
Performance Fees (2)
Open Programs
 
 
 
 
CCPT V
 
0.65% - 0.75%
 
INAV
 
0.90%
 
25%
CCIT III
 
0.65% - 0.75%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Closed Programs
 
 
 
 
CCIT II
 
0.65% - 0.75%
 
CCPT IV
 
0.65% - 0.75%
 
_______________________________________________
(1)    Annualized fee was based on the average monthly invested assets or average assets, as defined in the respective agreements, or net asset value, if available.
(2)    The performance fee was limited to 10% of the aggregate total return, for each class, for any individual year.

F-61

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The table below reflects the revenue earned from the Cole REITs (including closed programs, as applicable) and joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands).
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Offering-related fees and reimbursements
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling commissions (1)
 
$
7,746

 
$
19,943

 
$
14,101

Dealer manager and distribution fees (2)
 
5,021

 
8,300

 
5,133

Reimbursement revenue
 
3,329

 
8,283

 
5,178

Offering-related fees and reimbursements
 
16,096

 
36,526

 
24,412

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transaction service fees and reimbursements
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition fees
 
11,049

 
9,513

 
18,742

Financing coordination fee
 
100

 
220

 

Disposition fees (3)
 

 

 
4,974

Reimbursement revenues
 
2,780

 
2,800

 
2,164

Transaction service fees and reimbursements
 
13,929

 
12,533

 
25,880

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management fees and reimbursements
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset and property management fees and leasing fees
 
220

 
220

 
452

Advisory and performance fee revenue
 
57,765

 
51,099

 
44,948

Reimbursement revenues
 
18,449

 
17,587

 
13,845

Management fees and reimbursements
 
76,434

 
68,906

 
59,245

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income on Affiliate Lines of Credit
 
262

 
453

 
1,275

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total related party revenues   (4)
 
$
106,721

 
$
118,418

 
$
110,812

___________________________________
(1)
The Company reallowed 100% of selling commissions to participating broker-dealers during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 .
(2)
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , the Company reallowed $2.1 million , $3.2 million and $2.1 million , respectively, of dealer manager fees and/or distribution and stockholder servicing fees to participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement.
(3)
The Company earned a disposition fee of $4.4 million on behalf of CCIT when CCIT merged with Select Income REIT on January 29, 2015.
(4)
Total related party revenues excludes fees earned from 1031 real estate programs of $1.8 million , $1.4 million and $5.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , respectively.
Investment in the Cole REITs
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company owned aggregate equity investments of $3.3 million and $4.7 million , respectively, in the Cole REITs and other affiliated offerings, which are presented in investment in unconsolidated entities in the consolidated balance sheets, as the Company retained certain interests subsequent to the sale of Cole Capital. The Company accounts for these investments using the equity method of accounting which requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the respective Cole REIT’s earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income or loss from the Cole REITs in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the Company recognized a net loss of $0.5 million and $1.3 million , respectively, from the Cole REITs. During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company recorded net income of $0.1 million from the Cole REITs.
The table below presents certain information related to the Company’s investments in the Cole REITs as of December 31, 2017 (carrying amount in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
Cole REIT
 
% of Outstanding Shares Owned
 
Carrying Amount of Investment
CCPT V
 
0.76%
 
$
1,231

INAV
 
0.05%
 
125

CCIT II
 
0.44%
 
1,126

CCIT III
 
14.25%
 
675

CCPT IV
 
0.01%
 
107

Total
 
 
 
$
3,264


F-62

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Due to Affiliates
Due to affiliates was $66,000 and $16,000 as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively, related to amounts due to the Cole REITs.
Due from Affiliates, Net
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , $4.4 million and $5.2 million , respectively, was expected to be collected from affiliates, excluding any outstanding balances from a line of credit with one of the Cole REITs, discussed below, related to services provided by the Company and expenses subject to reimbursement by the Cole REITs in accordance with their respective advisory and property management agreements. These amounts will be settled with the respective Cole REIT and were not transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement.
On September 23, 2016, the Company entered into a $30.0 million revolving line of credit (the “Subordinate Promissory Note”) with Cole Corporate Income Operating Partnership III, LP (“CCI III OP”), the operating partnership of CCIT III (the “Subordinate Promissory Note Agreement”). The Subordinate Promissory Note bears variable interest rates of one-month LIBOR plus the Credit Facility Margin (as defined in the Subordinate Promissory Note Agreement), which ranges from 2.20% to 2.75% , plus 1.75% and matured on September 22, 2017. On March 28, 2017, CCI III OP entered into a modification agreement in order to extend the maturity date of the Subordinate Promissory Note from September 22, 2017 to September 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2017 , the Subordinate Promissory Note had an interest rate of 5.6% and $1.6 million and $10.3 million were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. The Subordinate Promissory Note was not transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement.
As of December 31, 2015 , the Company had revolving line of credit agreements in place with CCIT II and CCPT V (the “Affiliate Lines of Credit”) that provided for maximum borrowings of $60.0 million to each of CCIT II and CCPT V and bore variable interest rates of one month LIBOR plus 2.20% . As of December 31, 2015 , there was $50.0 million outstanding on the Affiliate Lines of Credit. During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Affiliate Lines of Credit matured and no amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 or 2016 .
Note 18 Net Income (Loss) Per Share/Unit
The General Partner’s unvested Restricted Shares contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered to be participating securities in accordance with U.S. GAAP and, therefore, are included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class computation method. Under the two-class computation method, net losses are not allocated to participating securities unless the holder of the security has a contractual obligation to share in the losses. The unvested Restricted Shares are not allocated losses as the awards do not have a contractual obligation to share in losses of the General Partner. The two-class computation method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of shares of Common Stock and participating securities according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings.

F-63

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computation for the General Partner for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017

2016
 
2015
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
$
51,495

 
$
(76,887
)
 
$
(138,992
)
Noncontrolling interests’ share in continuing operations
 
(1,005
)
 
1,908

 
2,341

Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the General Partner
 
50,490

 
(74,979
)
 
(136,651
)
Dividends to preferred shares and units
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
Net loss from continuing operations available to the General Partner
 
(21,402
)
 
(146,871
)
 
(208,543
)
Earnings allocated to participating securities
 
(491
)
 
(492
)
 
(410
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to limited partners
 
445

 
3,053

 
4,798

Net loss available to common stockholders used in basic and diluted net loss per share
 
$
(40,565
)
 
$
(268,247
)
 
$
(388,655
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted
 
974,098,652

 
931,422,844

 
903,360,763

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.23
)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.20
)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.29
)
 
$
(0.43
)
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders excludes approximately 0.3 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units and approximately 23.7 million OP Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2016 , diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders excludes approximately 0.9 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units and approximately 23.8 million OP Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2015 , diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders excludes approximately 3.3 million of unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units and approximately 23.8 million OP Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.


F-64

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Net Income (Loss) Per Unit
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders, which includes all common general partner unitholders and limited partner unitholders. The computation for the OP for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
$
51,495

 
$
(76,887
)
 
$
(138,992
)
Noncontrolling interests’ share in continuing operations
 
194

 
14

 
(1,274
)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Operating Partnership
 
51,689

 
(76,873
)
 
(140,266
)
Dividends to preferred units
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
Net loss from continuing operations available to the Operating Partnership
 
(20,203
)
 
(148,765
)
 
(212,158
)
Earnings allocated to participating units
 
(491
)
 
(492
)
 
(410
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
 
(19,117
)
 
(123,937
)
 
(184,500
)
Net loss available to common unitholders used in basic and diluted net loss per unit
 
$
(39,811
)
 
$
(273,194
)
 
$
(397,068
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average number of common units outstanding - basic and diluted
 
997,846,999

 
955,181,238

 
927,124,560

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.23
)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.20
)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.29
)
 
$
(0.43
)
For the year ended December 31, 2017 , diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders excludes approximately 0.3 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2016 , diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders excludes approximately 0.9 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2015 , diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders excludes approximately 3.3 million of unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
Note 19 – Income Taxes
The General Partner currently qualifies and has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. As a REIT, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax, with the exception of its TRS entities. However, the General Partner, including its TRS entities, and the Operating Partnership are still subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. The Company recognized state and local income and franchise tax expense of $6.9 million , $6.0 million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 , respectively, which are included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.1 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to a TRS entity, which are also included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No provision for income taxes related to a TRS entity was recorded for year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 . Any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Canadian federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions, and is subject to routine examinations by the respective tax authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal or state examinations by tax authorities for years before 2013.

F-65

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

As of December 31, 2017 , the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the OP, the General Partner, American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc., CapLease, Inc., American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc., and Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. are subject.
Note 20 Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2017 for the General Partner (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
 
March 31,
2017
 
June 30,
2017
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2017
Total revenues  (1)
 
$
320,898

 
$
308,245

 
$
306,543

 
$
316,599

Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
11,935

 
29,550

 
12,489

 
(2,479
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
2,855

 
4,636

 
4,005

 
(30,613
)
Net income (loss)
 
14,790

 
34,186

 
16,494

 
(33,092
)
Net income (loss) attributable to the General Partner
 
14,438

 
33,408

 
16,094

 
(32,122
)
Basic and diluted net loss (income) per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.01

(3)  
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.02
)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 
$
0.00

 
$
0.01

(3)  
$
0.00

 
$
(0.03
)
Basic and dilutive net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
0.02

(3)  
$
(0.00
)
 
$
(0.05
)
_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)
The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per share amounts. The Company calculates net income (loss) per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
(3)
Represents dilutive net income per share attributable to common stockholders and limited partners.
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2017 for the OP (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
 
March 31,
2017
 
June 30,
2017
 
September 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2017
Total revenues  (1)
 
$
320,898

 
$
308,245

 
$
306,543

 
$
316,599

Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
11,935

 
29,550

 
12,489

 
(2,479
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
2,855

 
4,636

 
4,005

 
(30,613
)
Net income (loss)
 
14,790

 
34,186

 
16,494

 
(33,092
)
Net income (loss) attributable to the OP
 
14,797

 
34,200

 
16,485

 
(32,910
)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.01

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.02
)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 
$
0.00

 
$
0.01

 
$
0.00

 
$
(0.03
)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
0.02

 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
(0.05
)
_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)
The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per unit amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per unit amounts. The Company calculates net loss per unit based on the weighted-average number of outstanding units during the reporting period. The average number of units fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.

F-66

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the General Partner (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
 
March 31,
2016
 
June 30,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2016
Total revenues  (1)
 
$
337,787

 
$
338,533

 
$
331,846

 
$
327,281

(Loss) income from continuing operations
 
(116,701
)
 
246

 
28,865

 
10,703

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
621

 
2,987

 
1,381

 
(128,926
)
Net (loss) income
 
(116,080
)
 
3,233

 
30,246

 
(118,223
)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner
 
(113,086
)
 
3,146

 
29,495

 
(115,418
)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 
$
(0.15
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
0.01

(3)  
$
(0.01
)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 
$
0.00

 
$
0.00

 
$
0.00

(3)  
$
(0.13
)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 
$
(0.15
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
0.01

(3)  
$
(0.14
)
_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)
The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per share amounts. The Company calculates net loss per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
(3)
Represents dilutive net income per share attributable to common stockholders and limited partners.
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the OP (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
 
March 31,
2016
 
June 30,
2016
 
September 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2016
Total revenues  (1)
 
$
337,787

 
$
338,533

 
$
331,846

 
$
327,281

(Loss) income from continuing operations
 
(116,701
)
 
246

 
28,865

 
10,703

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
621

 
2,987

 
1,381

 
(128,926
)
Net (loss) income
 
(116,080
)
 
3,233

 
30,246

 
(118,223
)
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP
 
(116,041
)
 
3,229

 
30,234

 
(118,232
)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 
$
(0.15
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
0.01

 
$
(0.01
)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 
$
0.00

 
$
0.00

 
$
0.00

 
$
(0.13
)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 
$
(0.15
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
0.01

 
$
(0.14
)
_______________________________________________
(1)
Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)
The sum of the quarterly net loss per unit amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per unit amounts. The Company calculates net loss per unit based on the weighted-average number of outstanding units during the reporting period. The average number of units fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.

F-67

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 21 – Subsequent Events
The following events occurred subsequent to December 31, 2017 :
Cole Sale
The Company closed on the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement on February 1, 2018. At closing, the Operating Partnership and Cole Capital entered into the Services Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to Cole Capital and its subsidiaries and to the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support. The Company will continue to provide such services through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by Cole Capital.
Real Estate Investment Activity
From January 1, 2018 through February 20, 2018, the Company disposed of seven properties for an aggregate gross sales price of $57.8 million , of which the Company’s share was $57.4 million and an estimated gain of $8.5 million . In addition, the Company acquired six properties for an aggregate purchase price of $66.3 million , excluding capitalized external acquisition-related expenses.
Common Stock Dividend
On February 21, 2018 , the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of  $0.55  per share) for the first quarter of 2018 to stockholders of record as of March 30, 2018, which will be paid on April 16, 2018 . An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP unit.
Preferred Stock Dividend
On February 21, 2018 , the Company’s board of directors declared a monthly cash dividend to holders of the Series F Preferred Stock for April 2018 through June 2018 with respect to the periods included in the table below. The corresponding record and payment dates for each month's Series F Preferred Stock dividend are also shown in the table below. The dividend for the Series F Preferred Stock accrues daily on a 360 -day annual basis equal to an annualized dividend rate of $1.675 per share, or $0.1395833 per 30 -day month.
Period
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
March 15, 2018 - April 14, 2018
 
April 1, 2018
 
April 16, 2018
April 15, 2018 - May 14, 2018
 
May 1, 2018
 
May 15, 2018
May 15, 2018 - June 14, 2018
 
June 1, 2018
 
June 15, 2018

F-68
 
VEREIT, INC. AND VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 2017 (in thousands)


Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Description
 
Balance at Beginning of Year
 
Additions
 
Deductions
 
Balance at End of Year
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Reserve for program development costs (1)
 
$
31,652

 
$
9,328

 
$
(33,348
)
(2  
)  
$
7,632

 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and other reserves
 
7,576

 
6,956

 
(1,849
)
 
12,683

(4  
)  
Unsecured note reserve
 
15,300

 

 

 
15,300

 
Total
 
$
54,528

 
$
16,284

 
$
(35,197
)
 
$
35,615

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Reserve for program development costs (1)
 
$
34,798

 
$
26,191

 
$
(29,337
)
(3  
)  
$
31,652

 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and other reserves
 
6,595

 
2,318

 
(1,337
)
 
7,576

 
Unsecured note reserve
 
15,300

 

 

 
15,300

 
Total
 
$
56,693

 
$
28,509

 
$
(30,674
)
 
$
54,528

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Reserve for program development costs (1)
 
$
13,109

 
$
21,689

 
$

 
$
34,798

 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and other reserves
 
2,475

 
4,564

 
(444
)
 
6,595

 
Unsecured note reserve
 

 
15,300

 

 
15,300

 
Total
 
$
15,584

 
$
41,553

 
$
(444
)
 
$
56,693

 
_______________________________________________
(1)
Classified as discontinued operations.
(2)
Deductions related to the return of the Company's interest in two funds not yet in offering ( $1.3 million ) and the closing of CCPT V's primary offering ( $32.0 million ).
(3)
Deductions related to the closing of CCIT II’s primary offering.
(4)
Includes $1.0 million classified as discontinued operations.


F- 69

VEREIT, INC. AND VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2017 (in thousands)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
24 Hour Fitness
 
Woodlands
 
TX
 
$

 
$
2,690

 
$
7,463

 
$
194

 
$
10,347

 
$
(2,251
)
 
9/24/2013
 
2002
7-Eleven
 
Sarasota
 
FL
 

 
1,312

 
1,312

 

 
2,624

 
(373
)
 
11/19/2012
 
2000
7-Eleven
 
Gloucester
 
VA
 

 
144

 
578

 

 
722

 
(163
)
 
12/24/2012
 
1985
7-Eleven
 
Hampton
 
VA
 

 
69

 
624

 

 
693

 
(176
)
 
12/24/2012
 
1986
7-Eleven
 
Hampton
 
VA
 

 
161

 
644

 

 
805

 
(182
)
 
12/24/2012
 
1959
AAA
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
3,639

 
32,567

 

 
36,206

 
(6,388
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Oneonta
 
AL
 
614

 
205

 
1,080

 

 
1,285

 
(234
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Oxford
 
AL
 

 
278

 
748

 

 
1,026

 
(150
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
Aaron Rents
 
Valley
 
AL
 
409

 
141

 
827

 

 
968

 
(169
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
El Dorado
 
AR
 

 
238

 
743

 

 
981

 
(168
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Aaron Rents
 
Springdale
 
AR
 
624

 
513

 
916

 

 
1,429

 
(205
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Auburndale
 
FL
 
2,647

 
1,351

 
5,127

 

 
6,478

 
(1,091
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Pensacola
 
FL
 

 
159

 
924

 

 
1,083

 
(189
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1979
Aaron Rents
 
Statesboro
 
GA
 

 
351

 
1,163

 

 
1,514

 
(244
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
235

 
1,071

 

 
1,306

 
(215
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Aaron Rents
 
Lafayette
 
IN
 
550

 
404

 
652

 

 
1,056

 
(161
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
Aaron Rents
 
Mansura
 
LA
 

 
81

 
497

 

 
578

 
(116
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Aaron Rents
 
Minden
 
LA
 

 
323

 
1,043

 

 
1,366

 
(255
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Battle Creek
 
MI
 

 
286

 
843

 

 
1,129

 
(176
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Aaron Rents
 
Benton Harbor
 
MI
 

 
217

 
924

 

 
1,141

 
(195
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Aaron Rents
 
Redford
 
MI
 
434

 
125

 
698

 

 
823

 
(166
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1972
Aaron Rents
 
Kennett
 
MO
 
319

 
203

 
473

 

 
676

 
(108
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Aaron Rents
 
Greenwood
 
MS
 

 
156

 
967

 

 
1,123

 
(212
)
 
2/19/2014
 
2006
Aaron Rents
 
Magnolia
 
MS
 
1,473

 
287

 
2,791

 

 
3,078

 
(546
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Aaron Rents
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 
579

 
308

 
1,201

 

 
1,509

 
(237
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Aaron Rents
 
Bowling Green
 
OH
 
564

 
326

 
928

 

 
1,254

 
(208
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Kent
 
OH
 
614

 
245

 
1,080

 

 
1,325

 
(247
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Aaron Rents
 
North Olmsted
 
OH
 
449

 
218

 
753

 

 
971

 
(178
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1960
Aaron Rents
 
Shawnee
 
OK
 

 
303

 
1,135

 

 
1,438

 
(247
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Bloomsburg
 
PA
 
400

 
224

 
856

 

 
1,080

 
(174
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Aaron Rents
 
Meadville
 
PA
 

 
237

 
1,224

 

 
1,461

 
(259
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994

F-70


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Aaron Rents
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
576

 
1,010

 

 
1,586

 
(206
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1977
Aaron Rents
 
Marion
 
SC
 
319

 
100

 
685

 

 
785

 
(141
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
480

 
1,075

 

 
1,555

 
(201
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
Aaron Rents
 
Copperas Cove
 
TX
 

 
423

 
1,341

 

 
1,764

 
(276
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Aaron Rents
 
Haltom City
 
TX
 

 
858

 
1,024

 

 
1,882

 
(232
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Humble
 
TX
 

 
548

 
1,146

 

 
1,694

 
(241
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Killeen
 
TX
 

 
815

 
3,244

 

 
4,059

 
(667
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1981
Aaron Rents
 
Kingsville
 
TX
 
599

 
345

 
1,040

 

 
1,385

 
(215
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Livingston
 
TX
 

 
173

 
1,498

 

 
1,671

 
(308
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Mexia
 
TX
 

 
126

 
1,186

 

 
1,312

 
(246
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Aaron Rents
 
Mission
 
TX
 
549

 
324

 
954

 

 
1,278

 
(196
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
99

 
768

 

 
867

 
(163
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Aaron Rents
 
Pasadena
 
TX
 

 
444

 
1,231

 

 
1,675

 
(258
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Aaron Rents
 
Port Lavaca
 
TX
 

 
160

 
1,274

 

 
1,434

 
(265
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Aaron Rents
 
Texas City
 
TX
 

 
275

 
2,156

 

 
2,431

 
(442
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Aaron Rents
 
Richmond
 
VA
 

 
508

 
1,435

 

 
1,943

 
(336
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Abbott Laboratories
 
Waukegan
 
IL
 

 
4,734

 
21,319

 
601

 
26,654

 
(4,771
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1980
Abuelo's
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
825

 
2,296

 

 
3,121

 
(598
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2003
Academy Sports
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
1,311

 
7,431

 

 
8,742

 
(1,474
)
 
11/1/2013
 
2012
Academy Sports
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
1,869

 
6,385

 

 
8,254

 
(1,432
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Academy Sports
 
Fayetteville
 
AR
 
7,290

 
1,900

 
7,601

 

 
9,501

 
(2,678
)
 
12/28/2012
 
2012
Academy Sports
 
Dalton
 
GA
 
4,965

 
998

 
5,656

 

 
6,654

 
(1,937
)
 
2/20/2013
 
2012
Academy Sports
 
Bossier City
 
LA
 

 
2,906

 
6,555

 

 
9,461

 
(1,353
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Academy Sports
 
Johnson City
 
TN
 

 
1,902

 
6,440

 

 
8,342

 
(203
)
 
12/19/2016
 
2015
Academy Sports
 
Smyrna
 
TN
 

 
2,109

 
8,434

 

 
10,543

 
(1,673
)
 
11/1/2013
 
2012
Academy Sports
 
Austin
 
TX
 
5,044

 
4,216

 
8,755

 

 
12,971

 
(1,538
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Academy Sports
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
2,072

 
8,329

 

 
10,401

 
(1,481
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Academy Sports
 
Killeen
 
TX
 
3,212

 
2,779

 
5,321

 

 
8,100

 
(1,007
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Academy Sports
 
Laredo
 
TX
 

 
2,782

 
8,111

 

 
10,893

 
(1,497
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 

 
455

 
373

 
6

 
834

 
(102
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1997
Advance Auto Parts
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 

 
330

 
494

 

 
824

 
(135
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1999
Advance Auto Parts
 
Calera
 
AL
 

 
723

 
723

 

 
1,446

 
(204
)
 
12/27/2012
 
2008

F-71


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts
 
Dothan
 
AL
 

 
326

 
326

 
(7
)
 
645

 
(91
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1997
Advance Auto Parts
 
Enterprise
 
AL
 

 
280

 
420

 
(6
)
 
694

 
(118
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1995
Advance Auto Parts
 
Opelika
 
AL
 

 
289

 
1,156

 

 
1,445

 
(306
)
 
4/24/2013
 
2013
Advance Auto Parts
 
Brooklyn
 
CT
 

 
324

 
1,429

 

 
1,753

 
(184
)
 
11/7/2014
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Bonita Springs
 
FL
 
1,561

 
1,219

 
1,552

 

 
2,771

 
(343
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Lehigh Acres
 
FL
 
1,425

 
379

 
2,016

 

 
2,395

 
(408
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Albany
 
GA
 

 
210

 
629

 
(1
)
 
838

 
(177
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1995
Advance Auto Parts
 
Cairo
 
GA
 

 
140

 
326

 
(24
)
 
442

 
(89
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1993
Advance Auto Parts
 
Hazlehurst
 
GA
 

 
113

 
451

 

 
564

 
(127
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1998
Advance Auto Parts
 
Hinesville
 
GA
 

 
352

 
430

 

 
782

 
(121
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1994
Advance Auto Parts
 
Perry
 
GA
 

 
209

 
487

 
(1
)
 
695

 
(137
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1994
Advance Auto Parts
 
Thomasville
 
GA
 

 
251

 
377

 
(30
)
 
598

 
(103
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1997
Advance Auto Parts
 
Auburn
 
IN
 

 
337

 
1,347

 

 
1,684

 
(408
)
 
3/29/2012
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Bedford
 
IN
 
760

 
100

 
1,386

 

 
1,486

 
(275
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Clinton
 
IN
 

 
182

 
729

 

 
911

 
(186
)
 
6/5/2013
 
2004
Advance Auto Parts
 
Fort Wayne
 
IN
 

 
193

 
450

 

 
643

 
(123
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1998
Advance Auto Parts
 
Fort Wayne
 
IN
 

 
200

 
371

 

 
571

 
(102
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1998
Advance Auto Parts
 
Franklin
 
IN
 
738

 
511

 
1,256

 

 
1,767

 
(242
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Advance Auto Parts
 
Mishawaka
 
IN
 

 
429

 
1,373

 

 
1,802

 
(272
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Richmond
 
IN
 

 
377

 
1,616

 

 
1,993

 
(315
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Salina
 
KS
 

 
195

 
782

 

 
977

 
(207
)
 
4/30/2013
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Barbourville
 
KY
 

 
194

 
1,098

 

 
1,292

 
(290
)
 
4/15/2013
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Bardstown
 
KY
 

 
272

 
1,090

 
236

 
1,598

 
(309
)
 
12/10/2012
 
2005
Advance Auto Parts
 
Brandenburg
 
KY
 

 
186

 
742

 

 
928

 
(209
)
 
12/10/2012
 
2005
Advance Auto Parts
 
Crestwood
 
KY
 
1,030

 
400

 
1,546

 

 
1,946

 
(297
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Advance Auto Parts
 
Florence
 
KY
 

 
550

 
1,280

 

 
1,830

 
(261
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Frankfort
 
KY
 

 
833

 
1,034

 

 
1,867

 
(202
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Georgetown
 
KY
 

 
510

 
1,323

 

 
1,833

 
(250
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Hardinsburg
 
KY
 

 
94

 
845

 

 
939

 
(238
)
 
12/10/2012
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Inez
 
KY
 

 
130

 
1,174

 

 
1,304

 
(342
)
 
8/22/2012
 
2010
Advance Auto Parts
 
Leitchfield
 
KY
 

 
104

 
939

 
(5
)
 
1,038

 
(263
)
 
12/10/2012
 
2005
Advance Auto Parts
 
Louisville
 
KY
 
740

 
336

 
1,289

 

 
1,625

 
(248
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009

F-72


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts
 
West Liberty
 
KY
 

 
249

 
996

 

 
1,245

 
(263
)
 
4/15/2013
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Rayne
 
LA
 

 
122

 
490

 
84

 
696

 
(129
)
 
5/21/2013
 
2000
Advance Auto Parts
 
Brownstown
 
MI
 

 
482

 
1,760

 

 
2,242

 
(342
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Caro
 
MI
 

 
117

 
665

 
(9
)
 
773

 
(206
)
 
11/23/2011
 
2002
Advance Auto Parts
 
Charlotte
 
MI
 

 
123

 
697

 
(6
)
 
814

 
(217
)
 
11/23/2011
 
2002
Advance Auto Parts
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
133

 
534

 
(3
)
 
664

 
(166
)
 
11/23/2011
 
2002
Advance Auto Parts
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 
657

 
368

 
1,296

 

 
1,664

 
(244
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Howell
 
MI
 
830

 
439

 
1,471

 

 
1,910

 
(283
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Livonia
 
MI
 

 
210

 
643

 

 
853

 
(199
)
 
12/12/2011
 
2003
Advance Auto Parts
 
Manistee
 
MI
 

 
348

 
1,043

 

 
1,391

 
(276
)
 
4/15/2013
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Monroe
 
MI
 

 
549

 
1,434

 

 
1,983

 
(280
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Romulus
 
MI
 

 
422

 
1,568

 

 
1,990

 
(313
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Sault Ste. Marie
 
MI
 

 
75

 
671

 
80

 
826

 
(215
)
 
11/23/2011
 
2003
Advance Auto Parts
 
South Lyon
 
MI
 

 
402

 
1,607

 

 
2,009

 
(310
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Tecumseh
 
MI
 

 
281

 
1,214

 

 
1,495

 
(227
)
 
5/27/2014
 
2009
Advance Auto Parts
 
Washington Twnshp
 
MI
 

 
645

 
1,711

 

 
2,356

 
(335
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Tupelo
 
MS
 

 
258

 
427

 

 
685

 
(109
)
 
2/20/2014
 
1998
Advance Auto Parts
 
Candler
 
NC
 

 
399

 
1,202

 

 
1,601

 
(237
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Advance Auto Parts
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
723

 
883

 

 
1,606

 
(180
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Advance Auto Parts
 
Eden
 
NC
 

 
320

 
746

 

 
1,066

 
(187
)
 
7/16/2013
 
2004
Advance Auto Parts
 
Granite Falls
 
NC
 

 
251

 
1,005

 

 
1,256

 
(293
)
 
8/9/2012
 
2010
Advance Auto Parts
 
Rocky Mount
 
NC
 

 
348

 
836

 

 
1,184

 
(194
)
 
2/21/2014
 
2005
Advance Auto Parts
 
Lakewood
 
NJ
 

 
750

 
1,750

 

 
2,500

 
(510
)
 
8/22/2012
 
2010
Advance Auto Parts
 
Woodbury
 
NJ
 

 
446

 
1,784

 

 
2,230

 
(528
)
 
6/20/2012
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Bethel
 
OH
 
730

 
234

 
1,305

 

 
1,539

 
(258
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Canton
 
OH
 
639

 
443

 
1,206

 

 
1,649

 
(251
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
470

 
1,349

 

 
1,819

 
(273
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Delaware
 
OH
 
706

 
502

 
1,274

 

 
1,776

 
(256
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Eaton
 
OH
 

 
157

 
471

 

 
628

 
(120
)
 
6/13/2013
 
1987
Advance Auto Parts
 
Franklin
 
OH
 

 
218

 
873

 

 
1,091

 
(254
)
 
8/9/2012
 
1984
Advance Auto Parts
 
Holland
 
OH
 
647

 
131

 
1,453

 

 
1,584

 
(282
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Massillon
 
OH
 

 
218

 
1,987

 

 
2,205

 
(392
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007

F-73


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts
 
Salem
 
OH
 
660

 
267

 
1,147

 

 
1,414

 
(227
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Advance Auto Parts
 
Springfield
 
OH
 

 
461

 
1,075

 

 
1,536

 
(303
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2005
Advance Auto Parts
 
Toledo
 
OH
 
619

 
116

 
1,375

 

 
1,491

 
(267
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Advance Auto Parts
 
Twinsburg
 
OH
 
619

 
486

 
1,004

 

 
1,490

 
(205
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Advance Auto Parts
 
Van Wert
 
OH
 

 
33

 
630

 

 
663

 
(161
)
 
6/13/2013
 
1995
Advance Auto Parts
 
Vermilion
 
OH
 

 
337

 
1,079

 

 
1,416

 
(228
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Warren
 
OH
 

 
83

 
745

 
(2
)
 
826

 
(223
)
 
4/12/2012
 
2003
Advance Auto Parts
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
208

 
1,178

 

 
1,386

 
(343
)
 
8/9/2012
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Sapulpa
 
OK
 
704

 
362

 
1,300

 

 
1,662

 
(245
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Chambersburg
 
PA
 

 
553

 
830

 

 
1,383

 
(227
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1997
Advance Auto Parts
 
Selinsgrove
 
PA
 

 
99

 
891

 

 
990

 
(227
)
 
6/3/2013
 
2003
Advance Auto Parts
 
Titusville
 
PA
 

 
207

 
1,172

 

 
1,379

 
(331
)
 
12/12/2012
 
2010
Advance Auto Parts
 
Chapin
 
SC
 

 
395

 
922

 

 
1,317

 
(273
)
 
6/20/2012
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Chesterfield
 
SC
 

 
131

 
745

 

 
876

 
(220
)
 
6/27/2012
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Greenwood
 
SC
 

 
210

 
630

 

 
840

 
(191
)
 
3/9/2012
 
1995
Advance Auto Parts
 
Rock Hill
 
SC
 

 
506

 
915

 
44

 
1,465

 
(182
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Advance Auto Parts
 
Sweetwater
 
TN
 

 
360

 
839

 

 
1,199

 
(239
)
 
11/29/2012
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Alton
 
TX
 

 
169

 
958

 
(3
)
 
1,124

 
(274
)
 
10/18/2012
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Deer Park
 
TX
 

 
295

 
1,507

 

 
1,802

 
(287
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 
800

 
343

 
1,029

 

 
1,372

 
(326
)
 
9/30/2011
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 
800

 
248

 
991

 

 
1,239

 
(314
)
 
9/30/2011
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
837

 
685

 

 
1,522

 
(199
)
 
8/21/2012
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
285

 
1,405

 

 
1,690

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Advance Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
225

 
1,293

 

 
1,518

 
(246
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
189

 
1,666

 

 
1,855

 
(316
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Humble
 
TX
 

 
420

 
1,404

 

 
1,824

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Huntsville
 
TX
 

 
327

 
1,278

 

 
1,605

 
(245
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Kingwood
 
TX
 

 
419

 
1,392

 

 
1,811

 
(267
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Advance Auto Parts
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
265

 
1,259

 

 
1,524

 
(243
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Pasadena
 
TX
 

 
382

 
1,146

 

 
1,528

 
(337
)
 
7/6/2012
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
Spring
 
TX
 

 
388

 
1,616

 

 
2,004

 
(290
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Webster
 
TX
 

 
385

 
1,452

 

 
1,837

 
(277
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008

F-74


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts
 
Appleton
 
WI
 

 
498

 
1,228

 

 
1,726

 
(248
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Fort Atkinson
 
WI
 

 
353

 
824

 

 
1,177

 
(203
)
 
8/26/2013
 
2004
Advance Auto Parts
 
Janesville
 
WI
 
939

 
299

 
1,695

 

 
1,994

 
(334
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Advance Auto Parts
 
Kenosha
 
WI
 

 
569

 
465

 

 
1,034

 
(125
)
 
3/13/2013
 
2004
Advance Auto Parts
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
610

 
1,473

 

 
2,083

 
(289
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Advance Auto Parts
 
St. Mary's
 
WV
 

 
309

 
928

 

 
1,237

 
(262
)
 
12/28/2012
 
2007
Aetna Life Insurance
 
Fresno
 
CA
 

 
3,405

 
22,343

 
(116
)
 
25,632

 
(1,472
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1969
AGCO
 
Duluth
 
GA
 
8,600

 
3,503

 
14,842

 
10

 
18,355

 
(2,474
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Albertson's
 
Lake Havasu City
 
AZ
 

 
1,275

 
5,396

 

 
6,671

 
(1,229
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Albertson's
 
Mesa
 
AZ
 

 
1,944

 
4,145

 

 
6,089

 
(910
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Albertson's
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
2,456

 
4,628

 

 
7,084

 
(1,008
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Albertson's
 
Scottsdale
 
AZ
 

 
2,872

 
7,943

 

 
10,815

 
(1,743
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Albertson's
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
2,710

 
7,704

 

 
10,414

 
(1,699
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Albertson's
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
1,642

 
3,587

 

 
5,229

 
(813
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Albertson's
 
Yuma
 
AZ
 

 
1,574

 
6,452

 

 
8,026

 
(1,432
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Albertson's
 
Denver
 
CO
 

 
2,058

 
5,286

 

 
7,344

 
(1,136
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Albertson's
 
Durango
 
CO
 

 
3,520

 
3,404

 

 
6,924

 
(788
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Albertson's
 
Fort Collins
 
CO
 

 
1,288

 
6,612

 

 
7,900

 
(1,443
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Albertson's
 
Alexandria
 
LA
 

 
1,423

 
6,024

 

 
7,447

 
(1,374
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Albertson's
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
1,711

 
7,061

 

 
8,772

 
(1,588
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Albertson's
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
1,681

 
5,673

 

 
7,354

 
(1,284
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1992
Albertson's
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
1,932

 
7,836

 

 
9,768

 
(1,791
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1985
Albertson's
 
Bossier City
 
LA
 

 
1,949

 
5,125

 

 
7,074

 
(1,129
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Albertson's
 
Lafayette
 
LA
 

 
1,556

 
7,926

 

 
9,482

 
(1,828
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Albertson's
 
Albuquerque
 
NM
 

 
2,834

 
3,682

 

 
6,516

 
(1,111
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Albertson's
 
Albuquerque
 
NM
 

 
2,950

 
3,388

 

 
6,338

 
(1,046
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1978
Albertson's
 
Clovis
 
NM
 

 
769

 
4,865

 

 
5,634

 
(1,253
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1984
Albertson's
 
Farmington
 
NM
 

 
1,442

 
2,505

 

 
3,947

 
(707
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Albertson's
 
Las Cruces
 
NM
 

 
1,588

 
5,719

 

 
7,307

 
(1,586
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Albertson's
 
Los Lunas
 
NM
 

 
1,105

 
4,770

 

 
5,875

 
(1,273
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Albertson's
 
Silver City
 
NM
 

 
591

 
3,824

 

 
4,415

 
(1,099
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1982

F-75



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Albertson's
 
Abilene
 
TX
 

 
1,187

 
6,373

 

 
7,560

 
(1,389
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1984
Albertson's
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
1,714

 
6,560

 

 
8,274

 
(1,429
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Albertson's
 
El Paso
 
TX
 

 
1,375

 
6,447

 

 
7,822

 
(1,458
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1978
Albertson's
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
2,146

 
4,678

 

 
6,824

 
(1,075
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Albertson's
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
1,833

 
7,311

 

 
9,144

 
(1,571
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Albertson's
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
1,833

 
4,528

 

 
6,361

 
(1,007
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Albertson's
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
1,174

 
6,255

 

 
7,429

 
(1,319
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Albertson's
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
1,002

 
9,885

 

 
10,887

 
(2,120
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1984
Albertson's
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
947

 
8,867

 

 
9,814

 
(1,879
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1985
Albertson's
 
Weatherford
 
TX
 

 
1,820

 
5,771

 

 
7,591

 
(1,280
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Ale House
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
290

 
3,647

 
(1,300
)
 
2,637

 
(244
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Ale House
 
St. Petersburg
 
FL
 

 
930

 
3,116

 

 
4,046

 
(797
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Aliberto's Mexican Food
 
Holbrook
 
AZ
 

 
32

 
96

 

 
128

 
(24
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1981
Allied Power Group
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
1,659

 
13,161

 
(7,475
)
 
7,345

 

 
6/12/2014
 
2009
Amazon
 
West Columbia
 
SC
 

 
3,112

 
53,103

 

 
56,215

 
(9,907
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Amazon
 
Charleston
 
TN
 
38,500

 
2,678

 
50,880

 

 
53,558

 
(9,387
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Amazon
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 
40,800

 
1,995

 
54,332

 

 
56,327

 
(10,267
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, Inc
 
Alhambra
 
CA
 

 
7,143

 
8,730

 

 
15,873

 
(2,640
)
 
1/24/2013
 
1966
AMEC Foster Wheeler Oil & Gas
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
2,524

 
30,398

 

 
32,922

 
(6,309
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1998
Amega West
 
West Alexander
 
PA
 

 
117

 
1,787

 

 
1,904

 
(299
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2010
Amega West
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
591

 
379

 

 
970

 
(67
)
 
6/12/2014
 
1979
Ameriprise
 
Ashwaubenon
 
WI
 
10,998

 
751

 
14,260

 

 
15,011

 
(3,412
)
 
1/25/2013
 
2000
Amesbury Truth
 
Statesville
 
NC
 

 
424

 
23,261

 

 
23,685

 
(130
)
 
10/24/2017
 
2017
AON
 
Lincolnshire
 
IL
 
92,517

 
5,336

 
124,777

 

 
130,113

 
(33,917
)
 
11/16/2012
 
1998
Apple Market
 
St. Joseph
 
MO
 

 
639

 
1,638

 

 
2,277

 
(322
)
 
3/28/2014
 
1981
Applebee's
 
Auburn
 
AL
 

 
1,155

 
1,732

 

 
2,887

 
(459
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Applebee's
 
Oxford
 
AL
 

 
1,162

 
2,157

 

 
3,319

 
(541
)
 
8/30/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Phenix City
 
AL
 

 
1,488

 
2,232

 

 
3,720

 
(592
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Applebee's
 
West Memphis
 
AR
 

 
388

 
1,536

 

 
1,924

 
(356
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Applebee's
 
Arvada
 
CO
 

 
754

 
1,760

 

 
2,514

 
(467
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Applebee's
 
Brighton
 
CO
 

 
657

 
1,972

 

 
2,629

 
(523
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Colorado Springs
 
CO
 

 
499

 
1,996

 

 
2,495

 
(529
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995

F-76



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Applebee's
 
Colorado Springs
 
CO
 

 
629

 
1,888

 

 
2,517

 
(501
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Greeley
 
CO
 

 
559

 
2,235

 

 
2,794

 
(593
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Northglenn
 
CO
 

 
578

 
1,734

 

 
2,312

 
(460
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Applebee's
 
Pueblo
 
CO
 

 
752

 
2,257

 

 
3,009

 
(587
)
 
8/30/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Pueblo
 
CO
 

 
960

 
2,879

 

 
3,839

 
(764
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Thornton
 
CO
 

 
681

 
2,043

 

 
2,724

 
(532
)
 
8/30/2013
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Bradenton
 
FL
 

 
2,475

 
3,713

 

 
6,188

 
(985
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Brandon
 
FL
 

 
2,453

 
3,647

 

 
6,100

 
(950
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Applebee's
 
Crestview
 
FL
 

 
943

 
1,752

 

 
2,695

 
(465
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Crystal River
 
FL
 

 
1,328

 
2,467

 

 
3,795

 
(654
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Applebee's
 
Davenport
 
FL
 

 
1,506

 
4,517

 

 
6,023

 
(1,198
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2007
Applebee's
 
Inverness
 
FL
 

 
1,977

 
2,965

 

 
4,942

 
(787
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
1,283

 
2,383

 

 
3,666

 
(632
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Applebee's
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
1,959

 
3,638

 

 
5,597

 
(965
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Largo
 
FL
 

 
2,334

 
3,501

 

 
5,835

 
(929
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
New Port Richey
 
FL
 

 
1,695

 
3,147

 

 
4,842

 
(835
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Plant City
 
FL
 

 
2,079

 
2,869

 

 
4,948

 
(747
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Applebee's
 
Riverview
 
FL
 

 
1,849

 
3,434

 

 
5,283

 
(911
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2006
Applebee's
 
St. Petersburg
 
FL
 

 
2,329

 
3,493

 

 
5,822

 
(927
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Temple Terrace
 
FL
 

 
2,396

 
3,594

 

 
5,990

 
(953
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Applebee's
 
Valrico
 
FL
 

 
1,202

 
3,274

 

 
4,476

 
(853
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Wesley Chapel
 
FL
 

 
3,272

 
3,272

 

 
6,544

 
(868
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Winter Haven
 
FL
 

 
2,130

 
2,603

 

 
4,733

 
(690
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Applebee's
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
1,254

 
2,329

 

 
3,583

 
(618
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Applebee's
 
Dublin
 
GA
 

 
1,171

 
1,431

 

 
2,602

 
(380
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Evans
 
GA
 

 
1,426

 
2,649

 

 
4,075

 
(703
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2004
Applebee's
 
Milledgeville
 
GA
 

 
1,174

 
1,761

 

 
2,935

 
(467
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Applebee's
 
Savannah
 
GA
 

 
1,329

 
2,468

 

 
3,797

 
(655
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Clinton
 
IA
 

 
490

 
1,184

 

 
1,674

 
(303
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Fort Dodge
 
IA
 

 

 
1,363

 

 
1,363

 
(549
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Marshalltown
 
IA
 

 
660

 
1,175

 

 
1,835

 
(300
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Mason City
 
IA
 

 
340

 
1,495

 

 
1,835

 
(382
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-77



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Applebee's
 
Muscatine
 
IA
 

 
330

 
1,266

 

 
1,596

 
(324
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Boise
 
ID
 

 
948

 
1,761

 

 
2,709

 
(467
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Garden City
 
ID
 

 
628

 
2,512

 

 
3,140

 
(654
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2003
Applebee's
 
Nampa
 
ID
 

 
729

 
2,915

 

 
3,644

 
(773
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Pocatello
 
ID
 

 
612

 
1,837

 

 
2,449

 
(487
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Marion
 
IL
 

 
855

 
1,527

 

 
2,382

 
(372
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Sterling
 
IL
 

 
390

 
1,291

 

 
1,681

 
(330
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Swansea
 
IL
 

 
727

 
1,741

 

 
2,468

 
(412
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Newton
 
KS
 

 
504

 
1,569

 

 
2,073

 
(408
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
Fall River
 
MA
 

 
275

 
1,558

 

 
1,833

 
(413
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Adrian
 
MI
 

 
407

 
2,351

 

 
2,758

 
(558
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Kalamazoo
 
MI
 

 
575

 
2,644

 

 
3,219

 
(549
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Farmington
 
MO
 

 
574

 
2,242

 

 
2,816

 
(528
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Applebee's
 
Joplin
 
MO
 

 
754

 
1,829

 

 
2,583

 
(467
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Applebee's
 
Rolla
 
MO
 

 
671

 
2,272

 

 
2,943

 
(536
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Applebee's
 
St. Charles
 
MO
 

 
781

 
1,075

 

 
1,856

 
(203
)
 
6/23/2014
 
1990
Applebee's
 
Horn Lake
 
MS
 

 
584

 
1,642

 

 
2,226

 
(376
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Applebee's
 
Ocean Springs
 
MS
 

 
673

 
1,708

 

 
2,381

 
(445
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Alamogordo
 
NM
 

 
271

 
2,438

 

 
2,709

 
(635
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Hobbs
 
NM
 

 
600

 
3,401

 

 
4,001

 
(902
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Applebee's
 
Rio Rancho
 
NM
 

 
645

 
3,654

 

 
4,299

 
(969
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Roswell
 
NM
 

 
405

 
2,295

 

 
2,700

 
(609
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Applebee's
 
North Canton
 
OH
 

 
152

 
838

 

 
990

 
(218
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Applebee's
 
Clackamas
 
OR
 

 
901

 
2,103

 

 
3,004

 
(558
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Applebee's
 
Gresham
 
OR
 

 
853

 
2,560

 

 
3,413

 
(666
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2004
Applebee's
 
Lake Oswego
 
OR
 

 
1,352

 
1,652

 

 
3,004

 
(438
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Applebee's
 
Roseburg
 
OR
 

 
717

 
1,673

 

 
2,390

 
(436
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Tualatin
 
OR
 

 
1,116

 
2,072

 

 
3,188

 
(550
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Applebee's
 
Chambersburg
 
PA
 

 
591

 
2,416

 

 
3,007

 
(499
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
600

 
2,166

 
(1,527
)
 
1,239

 
(15
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
Bartlett
 
TN
 

 
315

 
2,201

 

 
2,516

 
(489
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Applebee's
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
563

 
2,926

 

 
3,489

 
(762
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000

F-78



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Applebee's
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
898

 
2,058

 

 
2,956

 
(536
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2006
Applebee's
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 

 
1,114

 
1,988

 

 
3,102

 
(518
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Applebee's
 
New Braunfels
 
TX
 

 
566

 
1,486

 

 
2,052

 
(387
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Applebee's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
732

 
1,796

 

 
2,528

 
(468
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2003
Applebee's
 
Tyler
 
TX
 

 
696

 
2,904

 

 
3,600

 
(660
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Applebee's
 
Norton
 
VA
 

 
848

 
433

 

 
1,281

 
(236
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Applebee's
 
Wytheville
 
VA
 

 
564

 
923

 

 
1,487

 
(307
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Applebee's
 
Richland
 
WA
 

 
1,112

 
2,064

 

 
3,176

 
(548
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2003
Applebee's
 
Vancouver
 
WA
 

 
791

 
1,846

 

 
2,637

 
(481
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2001
Applebee's
 
Vancouver
 
WA
 

 
718

 
1,675

 

 
2,393

 
(444
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Apria Healthcare
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
981

 
3,922

 
423

 
5,326

 
(785
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1993
Arby's
 
Alexander City
 
AL
 

 
527

 
401

 

 
928

 
(101
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Arby's
 
Arab
 
AL
 

 
40

 
887

 

 
927

 
(219
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Guntersville
 
AL
 

 
142

 
503

 

 
645

 
(127
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Hampton Cove
 
AL
 

 
310

 
986

 

 
1,296

 
(244
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Bullhead City
 
AZ
 

 
550

 

 

 
550

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Arby's
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
559

 
618

 

 
1,177

 
(155
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Arvada
 
CO
 

 
190

 
1,465

 

 
1,655

 
(362
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Apopka
 
FL
 

 
464

 
697

 

 
1,161

 
(164
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Arby's
 
Merritt Island
 
FL
 

 
297

 
552

 

 
849

 
(130
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Arby's
 
Orange Park
 
FL
 

 
420

 
1,256

 

 
1,676

 
(310
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
251

 
585

 

 
836

 
(138
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Arby's
 
Rockledge
 
FL
 

 
381

 
571

 

 
952

 
(134
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Arby's
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
1,207

 
987

 

 
2,194

 
(232
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Arby's
 
Canton
 
GA
 

 
370

 
1,200

 

 
1,570

 
(297
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Douglasville
 
GA
 

 
370

 
1,692

 

 
2,062

 
(418
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Kennesaw
 
GA
 

 
583

 
840

 

 
1,423

 
(211
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Arby's
 
Richmond Hill
 
GA
 

 
430

 
755

 

 
1,185

 
(190
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Arby's
 
Savannah
 
GA
 

 
293

 
293

 

 
586

 
(69
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Arby's
 
Suwanee
 
GA
 

 
370

 
1,561

 

 
1,931

 
(386
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Mount Vernon
 
IL
 

 
911

 
764

 

 
1,675

 
(192
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Arby's
 
Avon
 
IN
 

 
500

 
812

 

 
1,312

 
(201
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-79



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Arby's
 
Fort Wayne
 
IN
 

 
529

 
647

 

 
1,176

 
(152
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Arby's
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
530

 
1,236

 

 
1,766

 
(305
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
370

 
1,130

 

 
1,500

 
(279
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
New Albany
 
IN
 

 
456

 
470

 

 
926

 
(118
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2005
Arby's
 
New Albany
 
IN
 

 
325

 
465

 

 
790

 
(117
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Scottsburg
 
IN
 

 
526

 
445

 

 
971

 
(112
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1989
Arby's
 
Winchester
 
IN
 

 
341

 
511

 

 
852

 
(120
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Arby's
 
Kansas City
 
KS
 

 
280

 
364

 

 
644

 
(90
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Salina
 
KS
 

 
540

 
300

 

 
840

 
(74
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Topeka
 
KS
 

 
270

 
433

 

 
703

 
(107
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Hopkinsville
 
KY
 

 
432

 
528

 

 
960

 
(124
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Arby's
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
336

 
625

 

 
961

 
(204
)
 
5/30/2013
 
1979
Arby's
 
Alma
 
MI
 

 
380

 
408

 

 
788

 
(101
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Chesterfield
 
MI
 

 
210

 
841

 

 
1,051

 
(208
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Davison
 
MI
 

 
420

 
631

 

 
1,051

 
(156
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
110

 
1,422

 

 
1,532

 
(351
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
230

 
1,428

 

 
1,658

 
(353
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Grandville
 
MI
 

 
1,133

 
755

 

 
1,888

 
(178
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Arby's
 
Midland
 
MI
 

 
340

 
753

 

 
1,093

 
(186
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Port Huron
 
MI
 

 
210

 
868

 

 
1,078

 
(214
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Saginaw
 
MI
 

 
310

 
1,110

 

 
1,420

 
(274
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
South Haven
 
MI
 

 
260

 
573

 

 
833

 
(142
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Walker
 
MI
 

 
360

 
1,002

 

 
1,362

 
(247
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Waterford
 
MI
 

 
180

 
962

 

 
1,142

 
(238
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Wyoming
 
MI
 

 
1,513

 
648

 

 
2,161

 
(152
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1970
Arby's
 
Corinth
 
MS
 

 
753

 
429

 

 
1,182

 
(108
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Arby's
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
420

 
2,001

 

 
2,421

 
(494
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Jonesville
 
NC
 

 
350

 
908

 

 
1,258

 
(224
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Kernersville
 
NC
 

 
280

 
774

 

 
1,054

 
(191
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Rochester
 
NY
 

 
128

 
384

 
(262
)
 
250

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Arby's
 
Columbus
 
OH
 

 
400

 
1,155

 

 
1,555

 
(285
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Willard
 
OH
 

 
230

 
599

 

 
829

 
(148
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-80



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Arby's
 
Allentown
 
PA
 

 
600

 
1,652

 

 
2,252

 
(408
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Carlisle
 
PA
 

 
200

 
472

 

 
672

 
(117
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Erie
 
PA
 

 
188

 
552

 
(470
)
 
270

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1966
Arby's
 
Hanover
 
PA
 

 
400

 
921

 

 
1,321

 
(228
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Arby's
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
201

 
469

 

 
670

 
(110
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Arby's
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
449

 
835

 

 
1,284

 
(196
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Arby's
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
260

 
627

 

 
887

 
(155
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Art Van Furniture
 
Avon
 
OH
 

 
925

 
10,031

 

 
10,956

 
(37
)
 
11/22/2017
 
2016
Art Van Furniture
 
Mentor
 
OH
 

 
1,090

 
9,582

 

 
10,672

 
(35
)
 
11/22/2017
 
2009
Art Van Furniture
 
Middleburg Heights
 
OH
 

 
1,440

 
5,529

 

 
6,969

 
(20
)
 
11/22/2017
 
1973
Art Van Furniture
 
North Canton
 
OH
 

 
545

 
8,636

 

 
9,181

 
(32
)
 
11/22/2017
 
2007
Art Van Furniture
 
Hanover
 
PA
 

 
703

 
4,108

 

 
4,811

 
(15
)
 
11/22/2017
 
1996
Art Van Furniture
 
Johnstown
 
PA
 

 
386

 
2,582

 

 
2,968

 
(10
)
 
11/22/2017
 
1969
Art Van Furniture
 
Lancaster
 
PA
 

 
2,156

 
6,030

 

 
8,186

 
(7
)
 
11/22/2017
 
1978
Ashley Furniture
 
Jeffersontown
 
KY
 

 
1,966

 
2,368

 

 
4,334

 
(450
)
 
9/26/2014
 
1970
At Home
 
Stockbridge
 
GA
 

 
2,057

 
8,967

 

 
11,024

 
(1,900
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
At Home & Gabes
 
Florence
 
KY
 

 
6,794

 
5,968

 

 
12,762

 
(372
)
 
12/14/2016
 
1992
AT&T
 
Schaumburg
 
IL
 

 
2,364

 
9,305

 
548

 
12,217

 
(1,813
)
 
9/24/2014
 
1989
AT&T
 
Richardson
 
TX
 
11,123

 
1,891

 
31,118

 
714

 
33,723

 
(6,484
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1986
Auto Pawn
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
170

 

 

 
170

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1987
AutoZone
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
698

 
1,047

 

 
1,745

 
(277
)
 
4/30/2013
 
1995
AutoZone
 
Yorkville
 
IL
 

 
383

 
1,534

 

 
1,917

 
(321
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2006
AutoZone
 
Pearl River
 
LA
 
719

 
239

 
1,193

 

 
1,432

 
(248
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
AutoZone
 
Hernando
 
MS
 

 
141

 
833

 

 
974

 
(154
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
AutoZone
 
Blanchester
 
OH
 
535

 
341

 
838

 

 
1,179

 
(172
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
AutoZone
 
Hamilton
 
OH
 
814

 
507

 
1,283

 

 
1,790

 
(259
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
AutoZone
 
Hartville
 
OH
 
614

 
197

 
1,156

 

 
1,353

 
(236
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
AutoZone
 
Mt. Orab
 
OH
 
679

 
258

 
1,219

 

 
1,477

 
(244
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
AutoZone
 
Trenton
 
OH
 
504

 
306

 
812

 

 
1,118

 
(165
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
AutoZone
 
Rapid City
 
SD
 
571

 
375

 
969

 

 
1,344

 
(191
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
AutoZone
 
Nashville
 
TN
 
861

 
555

 
1,270

 

 
1,825

 
(256
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Bahama Breeze
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
1,590

 
1,753

 

 
3,343

 
(218
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2004

F-81



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Bahama Breeze
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
2,370

 
1,313

 

 
3,683

 
(140
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1998
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant
 
Collinsville
 
IL
 

 
340

 
627

 

 
967

 
(160
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant
 
Arnold
 
MO
 

 
460

 
433

 

 
893

 
(111
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant
 
Fenton
 
MO
 

 
470

 
314

 

 
784

 
(82
)
 
8/30/2013
 
1986

F-82



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Bank of America
 
Merced
 
CA
 

 
512

 
2,195

 
212

 
2,919

 
(514
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1980
Bank of America
 
Asheville
 
NC
 

 
383

 
195

 

 
578

 
(45
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1993
Bank of America
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
62

 
642

 

 
704

 
(145
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1983
Banner Life Insurance
 
Urbana
 
MD
 
19,600

 
2,733

 
31,483

 

 
34,216

 
(5,661
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Beall's
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
2,033

 
4,809

 
18

 
6,860

 
(878
)
 
7/16/2014
 
2006
Becton, Dickinson and Company
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
9,313

 
1,666

 
19,092

 
71

 
20,829

 
(3,845
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2008
Bed Bath & Beyond
 
Stockton
 
CA
 
40,278

 
2,761

 
52,454

 

 
55,215

 
(16,726
)
 
8/17/2012
 
2003
Bed Bath & Beyond
 
Windsor
 
VA
 

 
3,032

 
59,649

 

 
62,681

 
(63
)
 
12/20/2017
 
2001
Benihana
 
Anchorage
 
AK
 

 
1,391

 
1,877

 

 
3,268

 
(460
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Benihana
 
Miami Beach
 
FL
 

 
3,775

 
433

 

 
4,208

 
(158
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1972
Benihana
 
Stuart
 
FL
 

 
1,661

 
1,917

 

 
3,578

 
(489
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1976
Benihana
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
1,151

 
1,485

 

 
2,636

 
(180
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Benihana
 
Schaumburg
 
IL
 

 
2,319

 
1,396

 

 
3,715

 
(357
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1992
Benihana
 
Wheeling
 
IL
 

 
1,896

 
1,273

 

 
3,169

 
(205
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Benihana
 
Farmington Hills
 
MI
 

 
2,025

 
2,049

 

 
4,074

 
(575
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Benihana
 
Maple Grove
 
MN
 

 
1,319

 
2,604

 

 
3,923

 
(631
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Benihana
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
2,988

 
1,275

 

 
4,263

 
(368
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1975
Best Buy
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 
3,148

 
1,370

 
5,749

 

 
7,119

 
(1,258
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Best Buy
 
Coral Springs
 
FL
 

 
2,715

 
4,843

 

 
7,558

 
(1,166
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Best Buy
 
Bourbonnais
 
IL
 

 
1,724

 
5,156

 

 
6,880

 
(1,245
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Best Buy
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
665

 
4,775

 

 
5,440

 
(1,009
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Best Buy
 
Richmond
 
IN
 

 
549

 
4,429

 

 
4,978

 
(958
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Best Buy
 
Marquette
 
MI
 

 
836

 
4,207

 
593

 
5,636

 
(1,067
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Best Buy
 
Norton Shores
 
MI
 

 
1,568

 
4,099

 

 
5,667

 
(865
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Best Buy
 
Southaven
 
MS
 

 
2,045

 
4,318

 

 
6,363

 
(983
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Best Buy
 
Tupelo
 
MS
 

 
484

 
1,934

 

 
2,418

 
(393
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2005
Best Buy
 
Pineville
 
NC
 

 
1,818

 
7,970

 

 
9,788

 
(1,687
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Best Buy
 
Findlay
 
OH
 

 
3,313

 
37,568

 
2,346

 
43,227

 
(903
)
 
2/15/2017
 
1996
Best Buy
 
Kenosha
 
WI
 

 
1,925

 
5,503

 

 
7,428

 
(1,162
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
BHC Marketing
 
The Woodlands
 
TX
 

 
4,724

 
40,332

 

 
45,056

 
(7,944
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2009
Big Lots
 
Chester
 
VA
 

 
335

 
3,373

 
169

 
3,877

 
(805
)
 
2/24/2014
 
2013
Big O Tires
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 
782

 
206

 
1,367

 

 
1,573

 
(265
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010

F-83



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Big O Tires
 
Los Lunas
 
NM
 

 
316

 
1,265

 

 
1,581

 
(392
)
 
6/1/2012
 
2006
Bi-Lo's Grocery
 
Greenwood
 
SC
 

 
533

 
4,212

 

 
4,745

 
(898
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Bi-Lo's Grocery
 
Mt Pleasant
 
SC
 

 
4,093

 
8,594

 

 
12,687

 
(1,845
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Boynton Beach
 
FL
 

 
5,569

 
10,931

 
(15
)
 
16,485

 
(2,220
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
5,929

 
16,348

 

 
22,277

 
(2,903
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Pembroke Pines
 
FL
 
8,446

 
5,104

 
7,661

 

 
12,765

 
(1,614
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Greenfield
 
MA
 
8,416

 
2,168

 
14,002

 

 
16,170

 
(2,383
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Leominster
 
MA
 

 
3,585

 
21,344

 

 
24,929

 
(3,609
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Uxbridge
 
MA
 
12,645

 
5,538

 
36,445

 

 
41,983

 
(5,686
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
California
 
MD
 

 
6,882

 
10,196

 

 
17,078

 
(2,027
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Westminster
 
MD
 
13,978

 
6,516

 
13,860

 

 
20,376

 
(2,724
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Auburn
 
ME
 

 
2,674

 
16,510

 

 
19,184

 
(2,707
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Portsmouth
 
NH
 

 
4,216

 
25,454

 

 
29,670

 
(4,163
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Deptford
 
NJ
 
11,004

 
6,558

 
12,490

 

 
19,048

 
(2,202
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
North Canton
 
OH
 
6,787

 
456

 
8,668

 
422

 
9,546

 
(2,989
)
 
2/20/2013
 
1998
BJ's Wholesale Club
 
Lancaster
 
PA
 
13,621

 
3,400

 
16,782

 

 
20,182

 
(3,182
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Black Angus
 
Dublin
 
CA
 

 
620

 
2,467

 

 
3,087

 
(631
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Black Bear Diner
 
Colorado Springs
 
CO
 

 
480

 
809

 

 
1,289

 
(207
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Black Meg 43
 
Copperas Cove
 
TX
 

 
151

 
151

 
(106
)
 
196

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1979
Blue Goose Cantina Mexican
 
Grapevine
 
TX
 

 
572

 
868

 

 
1,440

 
(226
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Bob Evans
 
Newark
 
DE
 

 
869

 
810

 

 
1,679

 
(13
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1996
Bob Evans
 
East Peoria
 
IL
 

 
717

 
1,142

 

 
1,859

 
(21
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1993
Bob Evans
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
430

 
708

 

 
1,138

 
(13
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2002
Bob Evans
 
Jackson
 
MI
 

 
980

 
1,305

 

 
2,285

 
(22
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2005
Bob Evans
 
Muskegon
 
MI
 

 
550

 
860

 

 
1,410

 
(15
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2001
Bob Evans
 
Amherst
 
OH
 

 
163

 
1,557

 

 
1,720

 
(27
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1987
Bob Evans
 
Brunswick
 
OH
 

 
1,147

 
1,088

 

 
2,235

 
(20
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1992
Bob Evans
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
563

 
1,706

 

 
2,269

 
(32
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2003
Bob Evans
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
601

 
1,529

 

 
2,130

 
(29
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2002
Bob Evans
 
Lancaster
 
OH
 

 
626

 
1,546

 

 
2,172

 
(28
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1998
Bob Evans
 
Lima
 
OH
 

 
366

 
1,631

 

 
1,997

 
(30
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2000
Bob Evans
 
Marion
 
OH
 

 
469

 
1,657

 

 
2,126

 
(30
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2008

F-84



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Bob Evans
 
Medina
 
OH
 

 
496

 
1,050

 

 
1,546

 
(20
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2000
Bob Evans
 
Mentor
 
OH
 

 
626

 
929

 

 
1,555

 
(17
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1999
Bob Evans
 
Mount Vernon
 
OH
 

 
343

 
1,338

 

 
1,681

 
(25
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2011
Bob Evans
 
Stow
 
OH
 

 
418

 
1,416

 

 
1,834

 
(27
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2002
Bob Evans
 
Troy
 
OH
 

 
512

 
1,255

 

 
1,767

 
(23
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1992
Bob Evans
 
Wapakoneta
 
OH
 

 
253

 
1,479

 

 
1,732

 
(28
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2001
Bob Evans
 
Willoughby
 
OH
 

 
675

 
1,262

 

 
1,937

 
(23
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2005
Bob Evans
 
Xenia
 
OH
 

 
337

 
1,433

 

 
1,770

 
(27
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1988
Bob Evans
 
Phoenixville
 
PA
 

 
495

 
438

 

 
933

 
(7
)
 
6/26/2017
 
1999
Bob Evans
 
Wilkes-Barre
 
PA
 

 
373

 
714

 

 
1,087

 
(12
)
 
6/26/2017
 
2003
Bob's Stores
 
Randolph
 
MA
 

 
2,840

 
6,826

 

 
9,666

 
(1,689
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1965
Bojangles
 
Winder
 
GA
 

 
645

 
1,198

 

 
1,843

 
(439
)
 
7/30/2012
 
2011
Bojangles
 
Biscoe
 
NC
 

 
247

 
986

 

 
1,233

 
(351
)
 
11/29/2012
 
2010
Bojangles
 
Boone
 
NC
 

 
278

 
833

 

 
1,111

 
(305
)
 
7/27/2012
 
1980
Bojangles
 
Denver
 
NC
 

 
1,013

 
1,881

 

 
2,894

 
(442
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Bojangles
 
Dobson
 
NC
 

 
251

 
1,004

 

 
1,255

 
(368
)
 
7/30/2012
 
2010
Bojangles
 
Hickory
 
NC
 

 
749

 
1,789

 

 
2,538

 
(450
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1973
Bojangles
 
Indian Trail
 
NC
 

 
655

 
1,217

 

 
1,872

 
(445
)
 
7/27/2012
 
2011
Bojangles
 
Morganton
 
NC
 

 
566

 
1,321

 

 
1,887

 
(484
)
 
7/27/2012
 
2010
Bojangles
 
Roanoke Rapids
 
NC
 

 
442

 
1,032

 

 
1,474

 
(378
)
 
7/27/2012
 
2011
Bojangles
 
Southport
 
NC
 

 
505

 
1,179

 

 
1,684

 
(431
)
 
7/30/2012
 
2011
Bojangles
 
Statesville
 
NC
 

 
646

 
1,937

 

 
2,583

 
(456
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Bojangles
 
Taylorsville
 
NC
 

 
436

 
1,108

 

 
1,544

 
(279
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Bojangles
 
Troutman
 
NC
 

 
718

 
1,077

 

 
1,795

 
(319
)
 
10/10/2013
 
2012
Bojangles
 
Chapin
 
SC
 

 
577

 
1,071

 

 
1,648

 
(389
)
 
8/9/2012
 
2009
Bojangles
 
Clinton
 
SC
 

 
397

 
926

 

 
1,323

 
(339
)
 
7/27/2012
 
2009
Bojangles
 
Fountain Inn
 
SC
 

 
287

 
1,150

 

 
1,437

 
(341
)
 
10/10/2013
 
2012
Bojangles
 
Greenwood
 
SC
 

 
440

 
1,320

 

 
1,760

 
(453
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1995
Bojangles
 
Moncks Corner
 
SC
 

 
505

 
1,179

 

 
1,684

 
(420
)
 
11/29/2012
 
2010
Bojangles
 
Walterboro
 
SC
 

 
454

 
1,363

 

 
1,817

 
(485
)
 
11/29/2012
 
2010
Bonefish Grill
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
750

 
1,897

 

 
2,647

 
(446
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Bonefish Grill
 
Independence
 
OH
 

 
895

 
2,252

 

 
3,147

 
(549
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006

F-85



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Bonefish Grill
 
Gainesville
 
VA
 

 
751

 
1,325

 

 
2,076

 
(465
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Boston Market
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
930

 

 
350

 
1,280

 
(46
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Boston Market
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
410

 
1,070

 

 
1,480

 
(264
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Boston Market
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
460

 
1,520

 

 
1,980

 
(376
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Boston Market
 
Raleigh
 
NC
 

 
280

 
1,015

 

 
1,295

 
(251
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Brick House Tavern & Tap
 
W. Windsor
 
NJ
 
1,043

 
1,307

 
1,498

 

 
2,805

 
(283
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Bridgestone Tire
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
651

 
1,954

 

 
2,605

 
(524
)
 
5/31/2013
 
2008
Bruegger's Bagels
 
Iowa City
 
IA
 

 
40

 
379

 
(8
)
 
411

 
(94
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Bruegger's Bagels
 
Durham
 
NC
 

 
312

 
728

 

 
1,040

 
(171
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1926
Bruegger's Bagels
 
Raleigh
 
NC
 

 
230

 
654

 

 
884

 
(162
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Buca di Beppo Italian
 
Wheeling
 
IL
 

 
450

 
1,272

 

 
1,722

 
(325
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Buca di Beppo Italian
 
Westlake
 
OH
 

 
370

 
887

 

 
1,257

 
(227
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Buffalo Wild Wings
 
Langhorne
 
PA
 

 
815

 
815

 

 
1,630

 
(216
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Bunge North America
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
1,100

 
8,433

 

 
9,533

 
(1,878
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2005
Burger King
 
Anchorage
 
AK
 

 
427

 
489

 

 
916

 
(123
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
Burger King
 
Andalusia
 
AL
 

 
181

 
1,025

 

 
1,206

 
(241
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Burger King
 
Atmore
 
AL
 

 
181

 
723

 

 
904

 
(170
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Burger King
 
Brewton
 
AL
 

 
307

 
920

 

 
1,227

 
(216
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Burger King
 
Dothan
 
AL
 

 
628

 
1,167

 

 
1,795

 
(274
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Burger King
 
Dothan
 
AL
 

 
594

 
1,104

 

 
1,698

 
(260
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Burger King
 
Enterprise
 
AL
 

 
437

 
655

 

 
1,092

 
(154
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
Evergreen
 
AL
 

 
172

 
689

 

 
861

 
(162
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Monroeville
 
AL
 

 
325

 
604

 

 
929

 
(142
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Opp
 
AL
 

 
214

 
857

 

 
1,071

 
(202
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Burger King
 
Troy
 
AL
 

 
461

 
1,383

 

 
1,844

 
(325
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Burger King
 
Sierra Vista
 
AZ
 

 
260

 
1,041

 

 
1,301

 
(245
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Burger King
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
300

 
1,307

 

 
1,607

 
(323
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Denver
 
CO
 

 
872

 
1,242

 

 
2,114

 
(313
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Burger King
 
Clearwater
 
FL
 

 
981

 
591

 

 
1,572

 
(149
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Burger King
 
Defuniak Springs
 
FL
 

 
362

 
1,087

 

 
1,449

 
(256
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Burger King
 
Largo
 
FL
 

 
683

 
412

 

 
1,095

 
(104
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Burger King
 
Niceville
 
FL
 

 
598

 
399

 

 
997

 
(94
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994

F-86



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Burger King
 
Panama City
 
FL
 

 
319

 
956

 

 
1,275

 
(225
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Springfield
 
FL
 

 
324

 
971

 

 
1,295

 
(228
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
720

 
720

 

 
1,440

 
(169
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
843

 
454

 

 
1,297

 
(107
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Burger King
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
635

 
865

 

 
1,500

 
(218
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
1,128

 
977

 

 
2,105

 
(246
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Burger King
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
795

 
943

 

 
1,738

 
(237
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
501

 
1,219

 

 
1,720

 
(307
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Burger King
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
380

 
499

 

 
879

 
(123
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
693

 
2,080

 

 
2,773

 
(489
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Burger King
 
Bainbridge
 
GA
 

 
347

 
1,042

 

 
1,389

 
(245
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Cairo
 
GA
 

 
245

 
981

 

 
1,226

 
(231
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Fort Oglethorpe
 
GA
 

 
170

 
2,175

 

 
2,345

 
(537
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Martinez
 
GA
 

 
909

 
1,350

 

 
2,259

 
(340
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Roswell
 
GA
 

 
495

 
1,156

 

 
1,651

 
(272
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Thomson
 
GA
 

 
748

 
876

 

 
1,624

 
(221
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
Valdosta
 
GA
 

 
564

 
376

 

 
940

 
(88
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Burger King
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
1,160

 
949

 

 
2,109

 
(223
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Burger King
 
Perry
 
IA
 

 
557

 
680

 

 
1,237

 
(160
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Red Oak
 
IA
 

 
334

 
1,002

 

 
1,336

 
(236
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
Shenandoah
 
IA
 

 
313

 
582

 

 
895

 
(137
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
Stuart
 
IA
 

 
607

 
911

 

 
1,518

 
(214
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Maywood
 
IL
 

 
860

 
1,051

 
(357
)
 
1,554

 
(119
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2003
Burger King
 
Springfield
 
IL
 

 
354

 
677

 

 
1,031

 
(170
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Gary
 
IN
 

 
544

 
606

 

 
1,150

 
(152
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Burger King
 
Cut Off
 
LA
 

 
726

 
1,088

 

 
1,814

 
(256
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Gonzales
 
LA
 

 
380

 
465

 

 
845

 
(109
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Lake Charles
 
LA
 

 
456

 
456

 

 
912

 
(107
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Burger King
 
Lake Charles
 
LA
 

 
610

 
746

 

 
1,356

 
(175
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Metairie
 
LA
 

 
728

 
392

 

 
1,120

 
(92
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Opelousas
 
LA
 

 
964

 
964

 

 
1,928

 
(227
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Burger King
 
Raceland
 
LA
 

 
356

 
533

 

 
889

 
(125
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000

F-87



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Burger King
 
Amesbury
 
MA
 

 
835

 
1,217

 

 
2,052

 
(306
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Burger King
 
Springfield
 
MA
 

 
983

 
516

 

 
1,499

 
(130
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1974
Burger King
 
Caribou
 
ME
 

 
770

 
440

 

 
1,210

 
(109
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Belding
 
MI
 

 
221

 
411

 

 
632

 
(97
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Burger King
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
614

 
331

 

 
945

 
(78
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
490

 
545

 

 
1,035

 
(135
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
260

 
780

 

 
1,040

 
(193
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
346

 
807

 

 
1,153

 
(190
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
Holland
 
MI
 

 
420

 
707

 

 
1,127

 
(175
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Hudsonville
 
MI
 

 
451

 
676

 

 
1,127

 
(159
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
L'Anse
 
MI
 

 
32

 
616

 

 
648

 
(145
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Burger King
 
Sparta
 
MI
 

 
640

 
570

 

 
1,210

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Spring Lake
 
MI
 

 
341

 
512

 
(222
)
 
631

 
(10
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Burger King
 
Walker
 
MI
 

 
305

 
711

 

 
1,016

 
(167
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1973
Burger King
 
Warren
 
MI
 

 
248

 
745

 

 
993

 
(175
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Burger King
 
Hastings
 
MN
 

 
328

 
608

 

 
936

 
(143
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
444

 
1,036

 

 
1,480

 
(244
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Burger King
 
Brandon
 
MS
 

 
649

 
1,513

 

 
2,162

 
(381
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1981
Burger King
 
Clarksdale
 
MS
 

 
865

 
865

 

 
1,730

 
(204
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
Cleveland
 
MS
 

 
688

 
1,606

 

 
2,294

 
(378
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
Greenville
 
MS
 

 
573

 
1,337

 

 
1,910

 
(314
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2004
Burger King
 
Greenville
 
MS
 

 
351

 
820

 

 
1,171

 
(193
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Burger King
 
Greenwood
 
MS
 

 
692

 
1,038

 

 
1,730

 
(244
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Burger King
 
Grenada
 
MS
 

 
536

 
805

 

 
1,341

 
(189
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Burger King
 
Philadelphia
 
MS
 

 
402

 
939

 

 
1,341

 
(221
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Burger King
 
Yazoo City
 
MS
 

 
489

 
909

 

 
1,398

 
(214
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Burger King
 
Asheville
 
NC
 

 
728

 
595

 

 
1,323

 
(140
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Burger King
 
Chadbourn
 
NC
 

 
353

 
797

 

 
1,150

 
(201
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Burger King
 
Claremont
 
NC
 

 
646

 
646

 

 
1,292

 
(162
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Burger King
 
Clinton
 
NC
 

 
494

 
801

 

 
1,295

 
(202
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Burger King
 
Durham
 
NC
 

 
170

 
352

 

 
522

 
(87
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Wilmington
 
NC
 

 
573

 
870

 

 
1,443

 
(219
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999

F-88



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Burger King
 
Blair
 
NE
 

 
272

 
1,087

 

 
1,359

 
(256
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Burger King
 
Wahoo
 
NE
 

 
196

 
1,109

 

 
1,305

 
(261
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Dover
 
NH
 

 
1,159

 
952

 

 
2,111

 
(240
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1970
Burger King
 
Nashua
 
NH
 

 
655

 
655

 

 
1,310

 
(154
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2008
Burger King
 
Edison
 
NJ
 

 
480

 
1,075

 

 
1,555

 
(266
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Elko
 
NV
 

 
260

 
1,001

 

 
1,261

 
(247
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Albany
 
NY
 

 
330

 
850

 

 
1,180

 
(210
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Central Square
 
NY
 

 
500

 
1,189

 

 
1,689

 
(294
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Cohoes
 
NY
 

 
270

 
563

 

 
833

 
(139
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Hamburg
 
NY
 

 
403

 
383

 

 
786

 
(96
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1974
Burger King
 
Irondequoit
 
NY
 

 
988

 
659

 

 
1,647

 
(155
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Burger King
 
Montgomery
 
NY
 

 
480

 
1,042

 

 
1,522

 
(258
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Schenectady
 
NY
 

 
380

 
936

 

 
1,316

 
(231
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Syracuse
 
NY
 

 
606

 
606

 

 
1,212

 
(142
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Burger King
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
569

 
466

 

 
1,035

 
(110
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Burger King
 
Mansfield
 
OH
 

 
191

 
766

 

 
957

 
(180
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
New Philadelphia
 
OH
 

 
419

 
779

 

 
1,198

 
(183
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Burger King
 
Willoughby
 
OH
 

 
410

 
1,005

 

 
1,415

 
(248
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Ardmore
 
OK
 

 
270

 
1,023

 

 
1,293

 
(253
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-89



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Burger King
 
Roseburg
 
OR
 

 
350

 
886

 

 
1,236

 
(219
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Harrisburg
 
PA
 

 
619

 
412

 

 
1,031

 
(97
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
Old Forge
 
PA
 

 
390

 
905

 
14

 
1,309

 
(12
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Gaffney
 
SC
 

 
370

 
880

 

 
1,250

 
(217
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
420

 
571

 

 
991

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
North Augusta
 
SC
 

 
256

 
1,451

 

 
1,707

 
(341
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
North Augusta
 
SC
 

 
450

 
1,050

 

 
1,500

 
(247
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Burger King
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
740

 
1,591

 

 
2,331

 
(393
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burger King
 
Gallatin
 
TN
 

 
199

 
463

 

 
662

 
(109
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Burger King
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
666

 
999

 
(517
)
 
1,148

 
(102
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Burger King
 
Laredo
 
TX
 

 
684

 
1,026

 

 
1,710

 
(241
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Burger King
 
Texas City
 
TX
 

 
421

 
782

 
300

 
1,503

 
(190
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Burger King
 
Spanaway
 
WA
 

 
509

 
1,628

 

 
2,137

 
(410
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Burger King
 
Germantown
 
WI
 

 
644

 
1,300

 

 
1,944

 
(327
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986
Burger King
 
Marshfield
 
WI
 

 
232

 
885

 

 
1,117

 
(223
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986
Burger King
 
Rhinelander
 
WI
 

 
260

 
606

 

 
866

 
(143
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Burger King
 
Weston
 
WI
 

 
329

 
718

 

 
1,047

 
(181
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Burger King
 
Bluefield
 
WV
 

 
210

 
1,163

 

 
1,373

 
(287
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Burlington
 
West Valley City
 
UT
 

 
2,331

 
5,821

 

 
8,152

 
(29
)
 
11/30/2017
 
2017
Cabela's
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
3,419

 
17,605

 

 
21,024

 
(148
)
 
9/25/2017
 
2012
Cabela's
 
Thornton
 
CO
 

 
3,677

 
19,099

 

 
22,776

 
(149
)
 
9/25/2017
 
2012
Cabela's
 
Grandville
 
MI
 

 
3,269

 
20,328

 

 
23,597

 
(165
)
 
9/25/2017
 
2013
Cabela's
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
3,383

 
11,590

 

 
14,973

 
(92
)
 
9/25/2017
 
2015
Cabela's
 
Lacey
 
WA
 

 
3,393

 
20,158

 

 
23,551

 
(146
)
 
9/25/2017
 
2007
Cactus Wellhead
 
Williston
 
ND
 

 
72

 
3,735

 

 
3,807

 
(553
)
 
7/24/2014
 
2011
Cactus Wellhead
 
Dubois
 
PA
 

 
129

 
2,542

 

 
2,671

 
(400
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2012
Cactus Wellhead
 
Center
 
TX
 

 
115

 
1,886

 

 
2,001

 
(296
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2011
Cactus Wellhead
 
Pleasanton
 
TX
 

 
144

 
2,908

 

 
3,052

 
(462
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2011
Cadbury Holdings
 
Whippany
 
NJ
 

 
2,767

 
38,018

 

 
40,785

 
(7,532
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2004
California Pizza Kitchen
 
Paradise Valley
 
AZ
 

 
2,285

 
1,480

 

 
3,765

 
(382
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
California Pizza Kitchen
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
1,279

 
3,249

 

 
4,528

 
(752
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
California Pizza Kitchen
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
2,307

 
1,857

 

 
4,164

 
(467
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993

F-90



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
California Pizza Kitchen
 
Schaumburg
 
IL
 

 
1,180

 
3,179

 

 
4,359

 
(738
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
California Pizza Kitchen
 
Grapevine
 
TX
 

 
1,544

 
2,250

 

 
3,794

 
(533
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Captain D's
 
Statesboro
 
GA
 

 
350

 
401

 

 
751

 
(99
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Captain D's
 
Florence
 
KY
 

 
248

 
325

 

 
573

 
(82
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1981
Captain D's
 
Southaven
 
MS
 

 
270

 
564

 

 
834

 
(139
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Captain D's
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
230

 
338

 

 
568

 
(84
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Captain D's
 
Duncanville
 
TX
 

 
295

 
246

 

 
541

 
(62
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
Cargill
 
Blair
 
NE
 
2,437

 
627

 
4,989

 

 
5,616

 
(859
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Carl's Jr.
 
Purcell
 
OK
 

 
77

 
513

 

 
590

 
(129
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
CarMax
 
Henderson
 
NV
 

 
8,542

 
10,396

 

 
18,938

 
(2,255
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
CarMax
 
Austin
 
TX
 
9,900

 
5,461

 
16,940

 

 
22,401

 
(3,305
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Carrabba's
 
Scottsdale
 
AZ
 

 
1,350

 
1,847

 

 
3,197

 
(317
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Carrabba's
 
Louisville
 
CO
 

 
1,083

 
1,400

 

 
2,483

 
(324
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Carrabba's
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
1,650

 
2,085

 

 
3,735

 
(502
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Carrabba's
 
Duluth
 
GA
 

 
836

 
2,881

 

 
3,717

 
(675
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Carrabba's
 
Bowie
 
MD
 

 
1,429

 
1,036

 

 
2,465

 
(448
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Carrabba's
 
Brooklyn
 
OH
 

 
1,187

 
2,212

 

 
3,399

 
(492
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Carrabba's
 
Washington Township
 
OH
 

 
906

 
1,859

 

 
2,765

 
(452
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Carrabba's
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
1,159

 
2,164

 

 
3,323

 
(497
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Carrabba's
 
Johnson City
 
TN
 

 
771

 
2,536

 

 
3,307

 
(632
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Cashland
 
Celina
 
OH
 

 
108

 
132

 

 
240

 
(35
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Castle Dental
 
Murfreesboro
 
TN
 

 
256

 
256

 

 
512

 
(68
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Cequent Trailer Products
 
Mosinee
 
WI
 

 
1,416

 
3,259

 

 
4,675

 
(318
)
 
2/21/2014
 
1992
Charleston's
 
Carmel
 
IN
 

 
140

 
3,016

 

 
3,156

 
(771
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Checkers
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
689

 

 

 
689

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Checkers
 
Hollywood
 
FL
 

 
160

 
2,220

 

 
2,380

 
(567
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Checkers
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
731

 
1,096

 

 
1,827

 
(258
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Checkers
 
Lauderhill
 
FL
 

 
280

 
1,951

 

 
2,231

 
(499
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Checkers
 
Miami
 
FL
 

 
621

 

 

 
621

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Checkers
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
1,033

 

 

 
1,033

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Checkers
 
Plantation
 
FL
 

 
220

 
1,461

 

 
1,681

 
(373
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Checkers
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
736

 

 

 
736

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-91



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Checkers
 
Fayetteville
 
GA
 

 
681

 

 

 
681

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Chedder's Casual Cafe
 
Brandon
 
FL
 

 
860

 
3,071

 
(2,203
)
 
1,728

 
(108
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2003
Chedder's Casual Cafe
 
Bolingbrook
 
IL
 

 
1,344

 
1,760

 

 
3,104

 
(458
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Chedder's Casual Cafe
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
1,053

 
2,345

 

 
3,398

 
(610
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Chevy's
 
Miami
 
FL
 

 
1,455

 
783

 

 
2,238

 
(208
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Chevy's
 
Greenbelt
 
MD
 

 
530

 
2,399

 

 
2,929

 
(613
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Chevy's
 
Lake Oswego
 
OR
 

 
590

 
1,693

 

 
2,283

 
(433
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Chicago Bridge & Iron
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
1,695

 
12,360

 
(1,567
)
 
12,488

 
(955
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2006
Children's Courtyard
 
Grand Prairie
 
TX
 

 
367

 
1,055

 

 
1,422

 
(220
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Childtime Childcare
 
Modesto
 
CA
 

 
280

 
1,524

 

 
1,804

 
(308
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Childtime Childcare
 
Bedford
 
OH
 

 
111

 
852

 

 
963

 
(191
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1979
Childtime Childcare
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
124

 
796

 

 
920

 
(177
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1985
Childtime Childcare
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
108

 
793

 

 
901

 
(170
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1986
Chilis
 
Fayetteville
 
AR
 

 
1,370

 
1,714

 

 
3,084

 
(438
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Chilis
 
East Peoria
 
IL
 

 
1,023

 
2,347

 

 
3,370

 
(611
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2003
Chilis
 
Flanders
 
NJ
 
1,508

 
1,402

 
842

 

 
2,244

 
(316
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Chilis
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
811

 
1,893

 

 
2,704

 
(502
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Chilis
 
Riverdale
 
UT
 

 
800

 
899

 

 
1,699

 
(230
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
China Buffet
 
Alvin
 
TX
 

 
110

 
299

 

 
409

 
(78
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
China Buffet
 
Angleton
 
TX
 

 
127

 
272

 

 
399

 
(71
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
China Town Buffet
 
Bismarck
 
ND
 

 
1,038

 
1,928

 

 
2,966

 
(511
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Chipper's Grill
 
Streator
 
IL
 

 
190

 
255

 

 
445

 
(65
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Church's Chicken
 
Atmore
 
AL
 

 
144

 
574

 

 
718

 
(135
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Church's Chicken
 
Bay Minette
 
AL
 

 
134

 
757

 

 
891

 
(178
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2003
Church's Chicken
 
Flomaton
 
AL
 

 
173

 
518

 

 
691

 
(122
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1981
Church's Chicken
 
Jackson
 
AL
 

 
127

 
719

 

 
846

 
(169
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Church's Chicken
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
254

 
380

 

 
634

 
(89
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Church's Chicken
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
178

 
533

 
(591
)
 
120

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1981
Church's Chicken
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
256

 
597

 

 
853

 
(140
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Church's Chicken
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
178

 
414

 
(525
)
 
67

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Church's Chicken
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
196

 
458

 

 
654

 
(108
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Church's Chicken
 
Anderson
 
SC
 

 
647

 
277

 
(648
)
 
276

 
(1
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1981

F-92



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Church's Chicken
 
Charleston
 
SC
 

 
421

 
344

 

 
765

 
(81
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1973
Church's Chicken
 
Charleston
 
SC
 

 
500

 
167

 

 
667

 
(39
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Church's Chicken
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
437

 
437

 
(486
)
 
388

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Church's Chicken
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
231

 
428

 
(393
)
 
266

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Church's Chicken
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
280

 
342

 
(482
)
 
140

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1970
Church's Chicken
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
254

 
472

 

 
726

 
(111
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2009
Church's Chicken
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
325

 
487

 
(458
)
 
354

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Church's Chicken
 
Greenwood
 
SC
 

 
188

 
349

 
(390
)
 
147

 
(1
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Church's Chicken
 
North Charleston
 
SC
 

 
302

 
302

 

 
604

 
(71
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Church's Chicken
 
North Charleston
 
SC
 

 
407

 
407

 

 
814

 
(96
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Church's Chicken
 
Orangeburg
 
SC
 

 
407

 
271

 
(322
)
 
356

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Church's Chicken
 
Spartanburg
 
SC
 

 
411

 
274

 
(528
)
 
157

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1972
Church's Chicken
 
Spartanburg
 
SC
 

 
350

 
525

 
(431
)
 
444

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Cigna
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
6,194

 
16,215

 

 
22,409

 
(3,018
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Cigna
 
Plano
 
TX
 

 
10,036

 
42,676

 

 
52,712

 
(8,036
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Circle K
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
344

 
1,377

 

 
1,721

 
(411
)
 
5/4/2012
 
1986
Circle K
 
Martinez
 
GA
 

 
348

 
813

 

 
1,161

 
(237
)
 
8/28/2012
 
2003
Circle K
 
Martinez
 
GA
 

 
293

 
329

 

 
622

 
(62
)
 
9/26/2014
 
1993
Circle K
 
Thomson
 
GA
 

 
637

 
340

 

 
977

 
(66
)
 
9/26/2014
 
1990
Circle K
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
675

 
1,254

 

 
1,929

 
(362
)
 
9/27/2012
 
1996
Citizens Bank
 
Colchester
 
CT
 

 
185

 
1,049

 

 
1,234

 
(290
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
Citizens Bank
 
Deep River
 
CT
 

 
453

 
1,812

 

 
2,265

 
(500
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1851
Citizens Bank
 
East Hampton
 
CT
 

 
312

 
935

 

 
1,247

 
(269
)
 
4/26/2012
 
1984
Citizens Bank
 
East Lyme
 
CT
 

 
258

 
1,032

 

 
1,290

 
(285
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1972
Citizens Bank
 
Hamden
 
CT
 

 
581

 
475

 

 
1,056

 
(131
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Higganum
 
CT
 

 
171

 
971

 

 
1,142

 
(338
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Montville
 
CT
 

 
413

 
2,342

 

 
2,755

 
(646
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1984
Citizens Bank
 
Stonington
 
CT
 

 
190

 
1,079

 

 
1,269

 
(298
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1984
Citizens Bank
 
Stonington
 
CT
 

 
104

 
937

 
(405
)
 
636

 

 
12/14/2012
 
1982
Citizens Bank
 
Lewes
 
DE
 

 
102

 
916

 

 
1,018

 
(239
)
 
2/22/2013
 
1968
Citizens Bank
 
Wilmington
 
DE
 

 
299

 
299

 

 
598

 
(86
)
 
4/26/2012
 
1967
Citizens Bank
 
Dorchester
 
MA
 

 
386

 
386

 

 
772

 
(111
)
 
4/26/2012
 
1960

F-93



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Citizens Bank
 
Ludlow
 
MA
 

 
810

 
540

 

 
1,350

 
(149
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Malden
 
MA
 

 
488

 
596

 

 
1,084

 
(165
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1920
Citizens Bank
 
Malden
 
MA
 
1,697

 
484

 
1,935

 

 
2,419

 
(534
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1988
Citizens Bank
 
Medford
 
MA
 
1,194

 
589

 
1,094

 

 
1,683

 
(302
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1938
Citizens Bank
 
Milton
 
MA
 
2,244

 
619

 
2,476

 

 
3,095

 
(666
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1968
Citizens Bank
 
New Bedford
 
MA
 

 
297

 
694

 

 
991

 
(191
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1983
Citizens Bank
 
Randolph
 
MA
 
1,383

 
480

 
1,439

 

 
1,919

 
(397
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1979
Citizens Bank
 
Somerville
 
MA
 

 
561

 
561

 

 
1,122

 
(155
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1940
Citizens Bank
 
South Dennis
 
MA
 

 

 
1,294

 

 
1,294

 
(348
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1986
Citizens Bank
 
Springfield
 
MA
 

 
187

 
747

 

 
934

 
(185
)
 
5/10/2013
 
1975
Citizens Bank
 
Winthrop
 
MA
 

 
390

 
724

 

 
1,114

 
(200
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1974
Citizens Bank
 
Woburn
 
MA
 

 
350

 
816

 

 
1,166

 
(220
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1991
Citizens Bank
 
Clinton Township
 
MI
 

 
574

 
3,250

 

 
3,824

 
(1,137
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Dearborn
 
MI
 

 
434

 
2,461

 

 
2,895

 
(809
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1977
Citizens Bank
 
Dearborn
 
MI
 

 
385

 
2,184

 

 
2,569

 
(718
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1974
Citizens Bank
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
112

 
636

 
(559
)
 
189

 
(2
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1958
Citizens Bank
 
Farmington
 
MI
 

 
303

 
707

 

 
1,010

 
(190
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1962
Citizens Bank
 
Grosse Pointe
 
MI
 

 
410

 
2,322

 

 
2,732

 
(800
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1975
Citizens Bank
 
Lathrup Village
 
MI
 

 
283

 
1,602

 

 
1,885

 
(558
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Livonia
 
MI
 

 
261

 
1,476

 

 
1,737

 
(519
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1959
Citizens Bank
 
Richmond
 
MI
 

 
168

 
951

 

 
1,119

 
(334
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Southfield
 
MI
 

 
283

 
1,605

 
(1,206
)
 
682

 
(4
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1975
Citizens Bank
 
St. Clair Shores
 
MI
 

 
309

 
1,748

 

 
2,057

 
(614
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Troy
 
MI
 

 
312

 
935

 

 
1,247

 
(252
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Utica
 
MI
 

 
376

 
2,133

 

 
2,509

 
(735
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1982
Citizens Bank
 
Warren
 
MI
 

 
178

 
1,009

 

 
1,187

 
(351
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1963

F-94



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Citizens Bank
 
Keene
 
NH
 
1,885

 
132

 
2,511

 

 
2,643

 
(676
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1900
Citizens Bank
 
Manchester
 
NH
 

 
640

 
782

 

 
1,422

 
(216
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1941
Citizens Bank
 
Manchester
 
NH
 

 

 
1,568

 

 
1,568

 
(422
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Pelham
 
NH
 

 
113

 
340

 

 
453

 
(98
)
 
4/26/2012
 
1983
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsfield
 
NH
 

 
160

 
908

 

 
1,068

 
(316
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1976
Citizens Bank
 
Rollinsford
 
NH
 

 
78

 
444

 

 
522

 
(154
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1977
Citizens Bank
 
Salem
 
NH
 

 
328

 
1,312

 

 
1,640

 
(353
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Haddon Heights
 
NJ
 

 
316

 
948

 

 
1,264

 
(226
)
 
7/23/2013
 
1965
Citizens Bank
 
Albany
 
NY
 

 
232

 
1,315

 

 
1,547

 
(432
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Amherst
 
NY
 

 
238

 
1,348

 

 
1,586

 
(450
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1965
Citizens Bank
 
East Aurora
 
NY
 

 
162

 
919

 

 
1,081

 
(307
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1996
Citizens Bank
 
Johnstown
 
NY
 

 
163

 
923

 

 
1,086

 
(303
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1973
Citizens Bank
 
Port Jervis
 
NY
 

 
143

 
811

 

 
954

 
(275
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Rochester
 
NY
 

 
166

 
943

 

 
1,109

 
(315
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1962
Citizens Bank
 
Vails Gate
 
NY
 

 
284

 
1,610

 

 
1,894

 
(529
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Whitesboro
 
NY
 

 
130

 
739

 

 
869

 
(243
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Alliance
 
OH
 

 
204

 
1,156

 

 
1,360

 
(408
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1972
Citizens Bank
 
Boardman
 
OH
 

 
280

 
1,589

 

 
1,869

 
(561
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1984
Citizens Bank
 
Broadview Heights
 
OH
 

 
201

 
1,140

 

 
1,341

 
(386
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1982
Citizens Bank
 
Brunswick
 
OH
 

 
186

 
1,057

 

 
1,243

 
(373
)
 
8/1/2010
 
2004
Citizens Bank
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
239

 
1,357

 

 
1,596

 
(479
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1973
Citizens Bank
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
210

 
1,190

 

 
1,400

 
(420
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1950
Citizens Bank
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
182

 
1,031

 

 
1,213

 
(364
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1930
Citizens Bank
 
Fairlawn
 
OH
 
1,885

 
511

 
2,045

 

 
2,556

 
(550
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1979
Citizens Bank
 
Lakewood
 
OH
 

 
196

 
1,111

 

 
1,307

 
(365
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1985
Citizens Bank
 
Louisville
 
OH
 

 
191

 
1,080

 

 
1,271

 
(381
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Massillon
 
OH
 

 
287

 
1,624

 

 
1,911

 
(573
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Northfield
 
OH
 

 
317

 
1,797

 

 
2,114

 
(625
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1969
Citizens Bank
 
Parma
 
OH
 

 
475

 
581

 

 
1,056

 
(156
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1971
Citizens Bank
 
Parma Heights
 
OH
 

 
426

 
638

 

 
1,064

 
(172
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1957
Citizens Bank
 
Rocky River
 
OH
 

 
283

 
1,602

 

 
1,885

 
(526
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1972
Citizens Bank
 
South Russell
 
OH
 

 
106

 
957

 

 
1,063

 
(257
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1981

F-95



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Citizens Bank
 
Wadsworth
 
OH
 

 
158

 
893

 

 
1,051

 
(315
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Willoughby
 
OH
 

 
395

 
2,239

 

 
2,634

 
(779
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1920
Citizens Bank
 
Aliquippa
 
PA
 

 
138

 
782

 

 
920

 
(210
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1953
Citizens Bank
 
Allison Park
 
PA
 

 
314

 
733

 

 
1,047

 
(202
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1972
Citizens Bank
 
Altoona
 
PA
 

 
153

 
459

 

 
612

 
(123
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1971
Citizens Bank
 
Ambridge
 
PA
 

 
215

 
1,217

 
(1,282
)
 
150

 
(4
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1925
Citizens Bank
 
Ashley
 
PA
 

 
225

 
675

 
(566
)
 
334

 

 
12/14/2012
 
1928
Citizens Bank
 
Beaver Falls
 
PA
 

 
138

 
553

 

 
691

 
(153
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Butler
 
PA
 

 
286

 
1,144

 

 
1,430

 
(308
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1966
Citizens Bank
 
Camp Hill
 
PA
 

 
430

 
645

 

 
1,075

 
(174
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1971
Citizens Bank
 
Carnegie
 
PA
 

 
73

 
1,396

 

 
1,469

 
(376
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1920
Citizens Bank
 
Dallas
 
PA
 

 
213

 
1,205

 

 
1,418

 
(332
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1949
Citizens Bank
 
Dillsburg
 
PA
 

 
232

 
926

 

 
1,158

 
(249
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1935
Citizens Bank
 
Drexel Hill
 
PA
 

 
266

 
1,064

 

 
1,330

 
(286
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1950
Citizens Bank
 
Erie
 
PA
 

 
168

 
671

 

 
839

 
(181
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1954
Citizens Bank
 
Ford City
 
PA
 

 
89

 
802

 
(468
)
 
423

 

 
12/14/2012
 
1975
Citizens Bank
 
Glenside
 
PA
 
1,257

 
343

 
1,370

 

 
1,713

 
(340
)
 
5/22/2013
 
1958
Citizens Bank
 
Greensburg
 
PA
 

 
45

 
861

 

 
906

 
(232
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1957
Citizens Bank
 
Havertown
 
PA
 

 
219

 
875

 

 
1,094

 
(242
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2003
Citizens Bank
 
Highspire
 
PA
 

 
216

 
649

 

 
865

 
(175
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1974
Citizens Bank
 
Homestead
 
PA
 

 
202

 
807

 

 
1,009

 
(223
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Kingston
 
PA
 

 
404

 
943

 

 
1,347

 
(254
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1977
Citizens Bank
 
Kittanning
 
PA
 

 
56

 
1,060

 

 
1,116

 
(285
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1889
Citizens Bank
 
Lancaster
 
PA
 

 
383

 
468

 

 
851

 
(129
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1967
Citizens Bank
 
Latrobe
 
PA
 

 
148

 
591

 

 
739

 
(159
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1969
Citizens Bank
 
Lower Burrell
 
PA
 

 
180

 
722

 

 
902

 
(194
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Matamoras
 
PA
 

 
509

 
946

 

 
1,455

 
(254
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1920
Citizens Bank
 
Mechanicsburg
 
PA
 
1,620

 
288

 
2,590

 

 
2,878

 
(715
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1900
Citizens Bank
 
Mercer
 
PA
 

 
105

 
314

 

 
419

 
(85
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1964
Citizens Bank
 
Milford
 
PA
 

 
513

 
769

 

 
1,282

 
(207
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1981
Citizens Bank
 
Monesson
 
PA
 

 
198

 
1,123

 
(1,222
)
 
99

 
(2
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1930
Citizens Bank
 
Mount Lebanon
 
PA
 
1,577

 
215

 
1,939

 

 
2,154

 
(535
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1960

F-96



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Citizens Bank
 
Mountain Top
 
PA
 

 
111

 
631

 

 
742

 
(170
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Narberth
 
PA
 

 
420

 
2,381

 

 
2,801

 
(782
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1935
Citizens Bank
 
Oakmont
 
PA
 

 
199

 
1,127

 

 
1,326

 
(303
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1967
Citizens Bank
 
Oil City
 
PA
 

 
110

 
623

 

 
733

 
(168
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1965
Citizens Bank
 
Philadelphia
 
PA
 

 
127

 
722

 
(543
)
 
306

 
(24
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1920
Citizens Bank
 
Philadelphia
 
PA
 

 
266

 
1,065

 

 
1,331

 
(287
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1971
Citizens Bank
 
Pitcairn
 
PA
 

 
46

 
867

 
(761
)
 
152

 

 
12/14/2012
 
1985
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
215

 
1,219

 

 
1,434

 
(336
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
256

 
767

 

 
1,023

 
(212
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
185

 
1,051

 

 
1,236

 
(283
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
389

 
1,168

 

 
1,557

 
(314
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1940
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
146

 
2,770

 

 
2,916

 
(745
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1900
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 
2,262

 
470

 
2,661

 

 
3,131

 
(716
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1979
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 
1,244

 
516

 
1,204

 

 
1,720

 
(324
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
206

 
1,852

 

 
2,058

 
(498
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1923
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 
918

 
196

 
1,110

 

 
1,306

 
(299
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
255

 
1,019

 

 
1,274

 
(274
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
268

 
2,413

 

 
2,681

 
(649
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Reading
 
PA
 

 
269

 
1,524

 

 
1,793

 
(384
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1904
Citizens Bank
 
Reading
 
PA
 

 
267

 
802

 

 
1,069

 
(216
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Temple
 
PA
 

 
268

 
626

 

 
894

 
(173
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1936
Citizens Bank
 
Turtle Creek
 
PA
 

 
308

 
923

 

 
1,231

 
(255
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1970
Citizens Bank
 
Tyrone
 
PA
 

 
146

 
583

 

 
729

 
(157
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1967
Citizens Bank
 
Upper Darby
 
PA
 

 
411

 
617

 

 
1,028

 
(166
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1966
Citizens Bank
 
Warrendale
 
PA
 

 
611

 
916

 

 
1,527

 
(246
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1981
Citizens Bank
 
West Hazleton
 
PA
 

 
279

 
2,509

 

 
2,788

 
(692
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1900
Citizens Bank
 
Wexford
 
PA
 

 
180

 
719

 

 
899

 
(194
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1975
Citizens Bank
 
Coventry
 
RI
 

 
559

 
559

 

 
1,118

 
(154
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1968
Citizens Bank
 
Cranston
 
RI
 

 
411

 
1,234

 

 
1,645

 
(332
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1967
Citizens Bank
 
East Greenwich
 
RI
 

 
227

 
680

 

 
907

 
(183
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1959
Citizens Bank
 
Johnston
 
RI
 

 
343

 
1,030

 

 
1,373

 
(284
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1972
Citizens Bank
 
N. Providence
 
RI
 
1,445

 
200

 
1,800

 

 
2,000

 
(484
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1971

F-97



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Citizens Bank
 
N. Providence
 
RI
 

 
223

 
892

 

 
1,115

 
(240
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1971
Citizens Bank
 
Providence
 
RI
 

 
300

 
899

 

 
1,199

 
(242
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1960
Citizens Bank
 
Rumford
 
RI
 

 
352

 
654

 

 
1,006

 
(176
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1977
Citizens Bank
 
Wakefield
 
RI
 

 
517

 
959

 

 
1,476

 
(265
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1976
Citizens Bank
 
Warren
 
RI
 

 
328

 
609

 

 
937

 
(168
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1980
Citizens Bank
 
Warwick
 
RI
 

 
1,870

 
8,828

 
697

 
11,395

 
(2,047
)
 
9/24/2013
 
1995
Citizens Bank
 
Middlebury
 
VT
 

 
363

 
544

 

 
907

 
(146
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1969
Citizens Bank
 
St. Albans
 
VT
 

 
141

 
798

 

 
939

 
(271
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1989
Coborn's Liquor Store
 
Stanley
 
ND
 

 
1,163

 
5,037

 

 
6,200

 
(997
)
 
2/21/2014
 
2014
Coborn's Liquor Store
 
Tioga
 
ND
 

 
1,065

 
4,581

 

 
5,646

 
(717
)
 
6/26/2014
 
2014
Comcast
 
Englewood
 
CO
 

 
1,490

 
5,060

 

 
6,550

 
(1,109
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1999
Community Bank
 
Lake Mary
 
FL
 

 
1,230

 
1,504

 
4

 
2,738

 
(340
)
 
10/1/2013
 
1990
Community Bank
 
Whitehall
 
NY
 

 
106

 
600

 

 
706

 
(197
)
 
8/1/2011
 
1995
CompUSA
 
Arlington
 
TX
 
1,770

 
2,437

 
1,467

 
127

 
4,031

 
(392
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1992
ConAgra Foods
 
Omaha
 
NE
 

 
6,451

 
30,697

 

 
37,148

 
(3,587
)
 
3/28/2014
 
1989
ConAgra Foods
 
Milton
 
PA
 
16,245

 
5,656

 
27,242

 

 
32,898

 
(4,943
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Conn's
 
Hurst
 
TX
 

 
497

 
1,990

 

 
2,487

 
(429
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1999
Cooper Tire & Rubber
 
Franklin
 
IN
 
15,355

 
4,438

 
33,994

 

 
38,432

 
(8,554
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2009
Cost Plus
 
La Quinta
 
CA
 

 
1,211

 
4,786

 

 
5,997

 
(997
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
County of Yolo, CA
 
Woodland
 
CA
 

 
2,640

 
13,681

 

 
16,321

 
(2,679
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2001
Cracker Barrel
 
Braselton
 
GA
 
2,935

 
1,294

 
2,403

 

 
3,697

 
(855
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2005
Cracker Barrel
 
Bremen
 
GA
 
2,677

 
1,012

 
2,361

 

 
3,373

 
(840
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2006
Cracker Barrel
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
912

 
3,153

 

 
4,065

 
(712
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Cracker Barrel
 
Greensboro
 
NC
 

 
1,632

 
2,495

 

 
4,127

 
(584
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Cracker Barrel
 
Mebane
 
NC
 
2,514

 
1,106

 
2,054

 

 
3,160

 
(731
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2004
Cracker Barrel
 
Rocky Mount
 
NC
 

 
1,274

 
2,334

 

 
3,608

 
(562
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Cracker Barrel
 
Fort Mill
 
SC
 

 
1,301

 
2,721

 

 
4,022

 
(644
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Cracker Barrel
 
Piedmont
 
SC
 

 
1,630

 
2,927

 

 
4,557

 
(691
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Cracker Barrel
 
Abilene
 
TX
 

 
1,374

 
2,933

 

 
4,307

 
(695
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Cracker Barrel
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
1,725

 
3,005

 

 
4,730

 
(668
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Cracker Barrel
 
Sherman
 
TX
 

 
557

 
3,744

 

 
4,301

 
(847
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Cracker Barrel
 
Bristol
 
VA
 

 
1,241

 
1,703

 

 
2,944

 
(489
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006

F-98



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Cracker Barrel
 
Emporia
 
VA
 
2,435

 
972

 
2,267

 

 
3,239

 
(807
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2004
Cracker Barrel
 
Waynesboro
 
VA
 

 
1,536

 
1,489

 

 
3,025

 
(519
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Cracker Barrel
 
Woodstock
 
VA
 
2,262

 
928

 
2,164

 

 
3,092

 
(770
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2005
Crest Production Services
 
Pleasanton
 
TX
 

 
519

 
7,949

 

 
8,468

 
(2,255
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2013
Crozer-Keystone Health
 
Ridley Park
 
PA
 
681

 

 
6,114

 

 
6,114

 
(1,374
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1976
CVS
 
Hoover
 
AL
 

 
1,239

 
2,890

 

 
4,129

 
(802
)
 
5/31/2013
 
2003
CVS
 
Meridianville
 
AL
 
1,927

 
1,045

 
3,057

 

 
4,102

 
(721
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 
5,025

 
1,511

 
4,533

 
4

 
6,048

 
(1,146
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 
3,015

 
901

 
2,704

 
15

 
3,620

 
(684
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
City Of Industry
 
CA
 
2,500

 
1,224

 
3,202

 

 
4,426

 
(651
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Fresno
 
CA
 
5,045

 
1,890

 
4,409

 
16

 
6,315

 
(1,115
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Palmdale
 
CA
 
5,226

 
2,493

 
4,630

 
17

 
7,140

 
(1,171
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Sacramento
 
CA
 
4,724

 
2,163

 
4,016

 
19

 
6,198

 
(1,016
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Norwich
 
CT
 
5,454

 
1,998

 
5,995

 
15

 
8,008

 
(1,515
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Dover
 
DE
 
2,046

 
4,081

 

 

 
4,081

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2010
CVS
 
Auburndale
 
FL
 
1,565

 
1,418

 
2,038

 

 
3,456

 
(443
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
CVS
 
Boca Raton
 
FL
 
2,625

 

 
3,560

 

 
3,560

 
(850
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Ft. Myers
 
FL
 
3,025

 
2,335

 
3,502

 

 
5,837

 
(838
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Gulf Breeze
 
FL
 
1,079

 
545

 

 

 
545

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 
3,715

 
2,240

 
4,323

 

 
6,563

 
(951
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 
2,258

 
587

 
2,347

 
16

 
2,950

 
(594
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Naples
 
FL
 
2,675

 

 
4,164

 

 
4,164

 
(914
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
New Port Richey
 
FL
 
1,618

 
1,149

 
2,966

 

 
4,115

 
(637
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
CVS
 
St. Augustine
 
FL
 

 
1,264

 
3,674

 

 
4,938

 
(804
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
St. Cloud
 
FL
 
2,626

 
1,534

 
1,875

 

 
3,409

 
(530
)
 
4/12/2013
 
2002
CVS
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
572

 
858

 
(12
)
 
1,418

 
(263
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1994
CVS
 
Ringgold
 
GA
 
1,948

 
1,346

 
2,939

 

 
4,285

 
(695
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
CVS
 
Stockbridge
 
GA
 

 
855

 
1,283

 

 
2,138

 
(375
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1998
CVS
 
Vidalia
 
GA
 

 
368

 
1,105

 

 
1,473

 
(341
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2000
CVS
 
Northbrook
 
IL
 
25,155

 
3,471

 
41,765

 
1,112

 
46,348

 
(7,467
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1980
CVS
 
Edinburgh
 
IN
 

 
420

 
1,530

 

 
1,950

 
(363
)
 
2/24/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Evansville
 
IN
 
1,850

 
227

 
3,060

 

 
3,287

 
(660
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000

F-99



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
CVS
 
Franklin
 
IN
 

 
310

 
2,787

 
(5
)
 
3,092

 
(902
)
 
3/29/2012
 
1999
CVS
 
Mishawaka
 
IN
 
2,258

 
409

 
4,532

 

 
4,941

 
(989
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
CVS
 
Tipton
 
IN
 

 
311

 
1,726

 

 
2,037

 
(408
)
 
2/24/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Lawrence
 
KS
 
2,908

 
837

 
4,392

 

 
5,229

 
(959
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Mandeville
 
LA
 
4,020

 
2,385

 
2,915

 
16

 
5,316

 
(738
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012

F-100



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
CVS
 
Metairie
 
LA
 
4,121

 
1,895

 
3,519

 
16

 
5,430

 
(890
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 
3,719

 
2,439

 
2,439

 
16

 
4,894

 
(618
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Slidell
 
LA
 
4,355

 
1,142

 
4,568

 
16

 
5,726

 
(1,155
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Hingham
 
MA
 
5,695

 
1,873

 
5,619

 
15

 
7,507

 
(1,420
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Malden
 
MA
 
5,360

 
1,757

 
5,271

 
14

 
7,042

 
(1,332
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
270

 
2,427

 
(5
)
 
2,692

 
(709
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1999
CVS
 
Harper Woods
 
MI
 

 
499

 
2,829

 

 
3,328

 
(827
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1999
CVS
 
Minneapolis
 
MN
 

 
266

 
4,693

 

 
4,959

 
(912
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Independence
 
MO
 

 
780

 
3,121

 

 
3,901

 
(686
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2000
CVS
 
St. Joseph
 
MO
 
3,015

 
1,022

 
3,067

 
16

 
4,105

 
(776
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Southaven
 
MS
 
3,030

 
1,849

 
3,217

 

 
5,066

 
(830
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Southaven
 
MS
 
4,270

 
1,281

 
4,100

 

 
5,381

 
(1,036
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Beaufort
 
NC
 
2,781

 
378

 
3,404

 
16

 
3,798

 
(861
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
1,185

 
2,176

 

 
3,361

 
(452
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
Eden
 
NC
 

 
836

 
1,450

 

 
2,286

 
(317
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Kernersville
 
NC
 

 
960

 
1,313

 

 
2,273

 
(285
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Weaverville
 
NC
 
3,098

 
1,998

 
4,307

 

 
6,305

 
(1,008
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Cherry Hill
 
NJ
 

 
2,255

 

 

 
2,255

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2011
CVS
 
Edison
 
NJ
 

 
3,318

 

 

 
3,318

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
Lawrenceville
 
NJ
 
5,170

 
2,674

 
6,412

 

 
9,086

 
(1,377
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Albuquerque
 
NM
 
3,719

 
975

 
3,899

 
16

 
4,890

 
(986
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Albuquerque
 
NM
 
3,920

 
1,029

 
4,118

 
17

 
5,164

 
(1,042
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Las Cruces
 
NM
 
4,925

 
1,295

 
5,178

 
17

 
6,490

 
(1,309
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
North Las Vegas
 
NV
 
3,268

 
1,374

 
3,207

 

 
4,581

 
(998
)
 
8/22/2012
 
2004
CVS
 
Sparks
 
NV
 

 
486

 
5,894

 

 
6,380

 
(1,298
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Henrietta
 
NY
 

 
965

 
1,180

 
(2
)
 
2,143

 
(358
)
 
11/8/2012
 
1997
CVS
 
Mineola
 
NY
 
2,280

 

 
5,120

 

 
5,120

 
(1,076
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
Warren
 
OH
 

 
560

 
1,622

 

 
2,182

 
(351
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
569

 
1,609

 

 
2,178

 
(331
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
CVS
 
The Village
 
OK
 
3,425

 
520

 
4,730

 

 
5,250

 
(1,026
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 
2,446

 
950

 
2,216

 
16

 
3,182

 
(561
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2010
CVS
 
Freeland
 
PA
 
982

 
122

 
1,096

 

 
1,218

 
(341
)
 
8/8/2012
 
2004

F-101



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
CVS
 
Mechanicsburg
 
PA
 
3,582

 
1,155

 
3,465

 

 
4,620

 
(1,052
)
 
11/29/2012
 
2008
CVS
 
New Castle
 
PA
 

 
412

 
2,337

 

 
2,749

 
(716
)
 
10/31/2012
 
1999
CVS
 
Shippensburg
 
PA
 
1,859

 
351

 
1,988

 

 
2,339

 
(582
)
 
2/8/2013
 
2002
CVS
 
Titusville
 
PA
 

 
670

 
683

 

 
1,353

 
(309
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Towanda
 
PA
 
878

 

 
877

 

 
877

 
(248
)
 
4/24/2013
 
2003
CVS
 
Anderson
 
SC
 

 
623

 
1,389

 

 
2,012

 
(291
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Cayce
 
SC
 

 
1,750

 
2,701

 

 
4,451

 
(651
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
CVS
 
Columbia
 
SC
 
2,278

 

 
2,811

 

 
2,811

 
(752
)
 
7/2/2013
 
2006
CVS
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
169

 
1,520

 

 
1,689

 
(445
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1997
CVS
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
1,108

 
1,816

 

 
2,924

 
(411
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Piedmont
 
SC
 

 
836

 
1,206

 

 
2,042

 
(249
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
CVS
 
Jackson
 
TN
 
3,082

 
1,209

 
2,822

 
16

 
4,047

 
(714
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 
2,613

 
1,190

 
2,210

 
16

 
3,416

 
(560
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
203

 
1,148

 
(4
)
 
1,347

 
(354
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1996
CVS
 
Converse
 
TX
 
3,538

 
1,390

 
3,243

 
15

 
4,648

 
(821
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Dumas
 
TX
 
2,312

 
846

 
2,537

 
16

 
3,399

 
(642
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Duncanville
 
TX
 

 
670

 
2,681

 

 
3,351

 
(594
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2000
CVS
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
1,179

 
3,060

 

 
4,239

 
(697
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
CVS
 
Elsa
 
TX
 
2,814

 
915

 
2,744

 
16

 
3,675

 
(694
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Ft . Worth
 
TX
 
4,147

 
2,453

 
3,679

 
15

 
6,147

 
(931
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Gainesville
 
TX
 
2,215

 
341

 
3,334

 

 
3,675

 
(701
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
CVS
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
3,806

 
1,996

 
2,993

 
15

 
5,004

 
(757
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
4,422

 
2,034

 
3,778

 
15

 
5,827

 
(955
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
2,660

 
868

 
2,605

 
16

 
3,489

 
(660
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
San Juan
 
TX
 
2,345

 
610

 
2,441

 
16

 
3,067

 
(618
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Hardy
 
VA
 
2,035

 
686

 
2,059

 

 
2,745

 
(571
)
 
5/16/2013
 
2005
CVS
 
Lynchburg
 
VA
 
1,748

 
914

 
2,987

 
70

 
3,971

 
(657
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
CVS
 
Madison Heights
 
VA
 
1,592

 
1,015

 
2,589

 
68

 
3,672

 
(561
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
CVS
 
Norfolk
 
VA
 
2,399

 
697

 
2,789

 
16

 
3,502

 
(706
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Portsmouth
 
VA
 
3,367

 
1,230

 
3,690

 
16

 
4,936

 
(933
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012
CVS
 
Roanoke
 
VA
 
2,269

 
825

 
2,474

 
14

 
3,313

 
(626
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
CVS
 
Virginia Beach
 
VA
 
3,114

 
683

 
3,868

 
14

 
4,565

 
(978
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2012

F-102



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
CVS
 
Williamsburg
 
VA
 
4,115

 
907

 
5,137

 
16

 
6,060

 
(1,299
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2011
Dahl's
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
628

 
3,947

 

 
4,575

 
(857
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1947
Dahl's
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
1,163

 
1,649

 

 
2,812

 
(361
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1959
Dahl's
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
2,871

 
11,761

 

 
14,632

 
(2,490
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Dahl's
 
Johnston
 
IA
 

 
3,202

 
6,644

 

 
9,846

 
(1,444
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Dairy Queen
 
Mauldin
 
SC
 

 
133

 

 

 
133

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Dairy Queen
 
Alto
 
TX
 

 
50

 
110

 

 
160

 
(27
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Dairy Queen
 
Pineland
 
TX
 

 
40

 
120

 

 
160

 
(30
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Dairy Queen
 
Silsbee
 
TX
 

 
60

 
100

 

 
160

 
(25
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Dairy Queen
 
Woodville
 
TX
 

 
98

 
65

 

 
163

 
(15
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
DaVita Dialysis
 
Osceola
 
AR
 

 
137

 
1,232

 

 
1,369

 
(277
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2009
DaVita Dialysis
 
Casselberry
 
FL
 

 
392

 
2,320

 

 
2,712

 
(427
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
DaVita Dialysis
 
Palatka
 
FL
 

 
207

 
1,173

 

 
1,380

 
(250
)
 
6/5/2013
 
2013
DaVita Dialysis
 
Sanford
 
FL
 

 
530

 
2,793

 

 
3,323

 
(478
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
DaVita Dialysis
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
118

 
1,818

 

 
1,936

 
(274
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
DaVita Dialysis
 
Douglasville
 
GA
 

 
119

 
1,858

 

 
1,977

 
(281
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
DaVita Dialysis
 
Ft. Wayne
 
IN
 

 
394

 
2,963

 
(7
)
 
3,350

 
(471
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
DaVita Dialysis
 
Hiawatha
 
KS
 

 
69

 
1,302

 

 
1,371

 
(283
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2012
DaVita Dialysis
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 

 
511

 
2,237

 

 
2,748

 
(301
)
 
9/30/2014
 
2010
DaVita Dialysis
 
Allen Park
 
MI
 

 
209

 
1,885

 

 
2,094

 
(512
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1955
DaVita Dialysis
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
215

 
1,794

 

 
2,009

 
(312
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
DaVita Dialysis
 
Clinton
 
MO
 

 
128

 
896

 

 
1,024

 
(168
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2003
DaVita Dialysis
 
St. Pauls
 
NC
 

 
138

 
1,246

 

 
1,384

 
(256
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2006
DaVita Dialysis
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
312

 
1,994

 

 
2,306

 
(342
)
 
3/31/2014
 
1932
DaVita Dialysis
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
219

 
878

 
(2
)
 
1,095

 
(197
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2008
DaVita Dialysis
 
Georgetown
 
OH
 

 
125

 
706

 
(1
)
 
830

 
(159
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2009
DaVita Dialysis
 
Willow Grove
 
PA
 

 
311

 
3,886

 
36

 
4,233

 
(616
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
DaVita Dialysis
 
Hartsville
 
SC
 

 
126

 
1,136

 

 
1,262

 
(247
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2013
DaVita Dialysis
 
Beeville
 
TX
 

 
99

 
1,879

 

 
1,978

 
(510
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1979
DaVita Dialysis
 
Federal Way
 
WA
 
17,751

 
1,929

 
22,357

 

 
24,286

 
(7,080
)
 
11/21/2012
 
2000
Del Monte
 
Lathrop
 
CA
 

 
3,414

 
41,318

 
526

 
45,258

 
(10,419
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1993
Denny's
 
Mesa
 
AZ
 

 
1,089

 
891

 

 
1,980

 
(236
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994

F-103



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Denny's
 
Peoria
 
AZ
 

 
310

 
457

 

 
767

 
(119
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
825

 
1,237

 

 
2,062

 
(328
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Denny's
 
Scottsdale
 
AZ
 

 
736

 
491

 

 
1,227

 
(130
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Denny's
 
Tempe
 
AZ
 

 
378

 
245

 

 
623

 
(60
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Denny's
 
Tempe
 
AZ
 

 
1,567

 
844

 

 
2,411

 
(224
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Idaho Falls
 
ID
 

 
196

 
432

 

 
628

 
(100
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Merriam
 
KS
 

 
390

 
1,150

 

 
1,540

 
(294
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Topeka
 
KS
 

 
630

 
446

 

 
1,076

 
(114
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Bloomington
 
MN
 

 
1,184

 

 

 
1,184

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Branson
 
MO
 

 
620

 
2,209

 

 
2,829

 
(565
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
750

 
686

 

 
1,436

 
(175
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
N. Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
630

 
937

 

 
1,567

 
(240
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Sedalia
 
MO
 

 
500

 
783

 

 
1,283

 
(200
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Black Mountain
 
NC
 

 
210

 
505

 

 
715

 
(129
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Mooresville
 
NC
 

 
250

 
841

 

 
1,091

 
(215
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Henrietta
 
NY
 

 
361

 
241

 

 
602

 
(64
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1970
Denny's
 
Watertown
 
NY
 

 
330

 
1,107

 

 
1,437

 
(283
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Fremont
 
OH
 

 
320

 
975

 

 
1,295

 
(249
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Marion
 
OH
 

 
115

 
390

 

 
505

 
(102
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1989
Denny's
 
Ontario
 
OR
 

 
240

 
1,067

 

 
1,307

 
(273
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
570

 
554

 

 
1,124

 
(142
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Denny's
 
Pasadena
 
TX
 

 
500

 
1,316

 

 
1,816

 
(336
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Dick's Sporting Goods
 
Fort Gratiot
 
MI
 

 
722

 
7,743

 

 
8,465

 
(1,680
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Dick's Sporting Goods
 
Moore
 
OK
 

 
1,243

 
10,426

 
13

 
11,682

 
(2,224
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dick's Sporting Goods
 
Charleston
 
SC
 

 
3,733

 
5,025

 

 
8,758

 
(1,128
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Dick's Sporting Goods
 
Jackson
 
TN
 

 
1,346

 
6,106

 

 
7,452

 
(1,314
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
DJO, LLC
 
Vista
 
CA
 

 
3,732

 
16,868

 

 
20,600

 
(8,012
)
 
8/15/2014
 
2006
Dollar General
 
Andalusia
 
AL
 

 
317

 
914

 

 
1,231

 
(85
)
 
7/24/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 

 
156

 
882

 

 
1,038

 
(261
)
 
6/6/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bremen
 
AL
 

 
59

 
1,017

 

 
1,076

 
(165
)
 
9/29/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Butler
 
AL
 

 
338

 
1,093

 

 
1,431

 
(235
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Childersburg
 
AL
 

 
328

 
986

 

 
1,314

 
(217
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013

F-104



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Chunchula
 
AL
 

 
174

 
697

 

 
871

 
(210
)
 
4/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Cullman
 
AL
 

 
331

 
780

 

 
1,111

 
(168
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Cullman
 
AL
 

 
221

 
861

 

 
1,082

 
(127
)
 
9/26/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Frisco City
 
AL
 

 
121

 
836

 

 
957

 
(184
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Gardendale
 
AL
 

 
142

 
805

 

 
947

 
(235
)
 
8/9/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Hartselle
 
AL
 

 
473

 
983

 

 
1,456

 
(217
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Headland
 
AL
 

 
387

 
1,091

 

 
1,478

 
(171
)
 
8/13/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
207

 
1,039

 

 
1,246

 
(226
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Moulton
 
AL
 

 
517

 
1,207

 

 
1,724

 
(363
)
 
4/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Mt. Vernon
 
AL
 

 
260

 
1,402

 

 
1,662

 
(307
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Ohatchee
 
AL
 

 
97

 
942

 

 
1,039

 
(163
)
 
4/17/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Phenix City
 
AL
 

 
267

 
929

 

 
1,196

 
(200
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Phenix City
 
AL
 

 
386

 
1,104

 

 
1,490

 
(242
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Red Level
 
AL
 
300

 
120

 
680

 

 
800

 
(214
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Sylacauga
 
AL
 

 
120

 
968

 

 
1,088

 
(208
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Tarrant
 
AL
 

 
217

 
869

 

 
1,086

 
(269
)
 
12/12/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Troy
 
AL
 

 
67

 
963

 

 
1,030

 
(209
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Tuscaloosa
 
AL
 
300

 
133

 
756

 

 
889

 
(234
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Vance
 
AL
 

 
191

 
731

 

 
922

 
(157
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Ash Flat
 
AR
 

 
44

 
132

 
(2
)
 
174

 
(39
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1997
Dollar General
 
Batesville
 
AR
 

 
32

 
285

 
7

 
324

 
(71
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1998
Dollar General
 
Batesville
 
AR
 

 
42

 
374

 
26

 
442

 
(94
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1999
Dollar General
 
Beebe
 
AR
 

 
51

 
478

 

 
529

 
(117
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1999
Dollar General
 
Bella Vista
 
AR
 

 
129

 
302

 

 
431

 
(94
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2005
Dollar General
 
Bergman
 
AR
 

 
113

 
639

 

 
752

 
(188
)
 
7/2/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Blytheville
 
AR
 

 
30

 
285

 

 
315

 
(70
)
 
7/25/2013
 
2000
Dollar General
 
Carlisle
 
AR
 

 
13

 
245

 
(2
)
 
256

 
(76
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2005
Dollar General
 
Des Arc
 
AR
 

 
56

 
508

 
53

 
617

 
(128
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1999
Dollar General
 
Dumas
 
AR
 

 
46

 
412

 
24

 
482

 
(103
)
 
7/25/2013
 
2000
Dollar General
 
Flippin
 
AR
 

 
53

 
64

 
(1
)
 
116

 
(19
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1994
Dollar General
 
Gassville
 
AR
 

 
54

 
325

 

 
379

 
(80
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1999
Dollar General
 
Green Forest
 
AR
 

 
52

 
303

 

 
355

 
(94
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2005

F-105



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Higden
 
AR
 

 
52

 
469

 
75

 
596

 
(117
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Lake Village
 
AR
 

 
64

 
362

 
29

 
455

 
(91
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Lepanto
 
AR
 

 
43

 
389

 

 
432

 
(97
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
73

 
412

 
13

 
498

 
(103
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Marvell
 
AR
 

 
40

 
364

 
107

 
511

 
(90
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Maynard
 
AR
 

 
73

 
654

 

 
727

 
(185
)
 
12/4/2012
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Mcgehee
 
AR
 

 
25

 
228

 
29

 
282

 
(57
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1998
Dollar General
 
Quitman
 
AR
 

 
45

 
426

 

 
471

 
(103
)
 
7/25/2013
 
2001
Dollar General
 
Searcy
 
AR
 

 
29

 
263

 
12

 
304

 
(66
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1998
Dollar General
 
Tuckerman
 
AR
 

 
49

 
280

 
80

 
409

 
(70
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1999
Dollar General
 
White Hall
 
AR
 

 
43

 
388

 

 
431

 
(97
)
 
7/25/2013
 
1999
Dollar General
 
Wooster
 
AR
 

 
74

 
664

 

 
738

 
(187
)
 
12/4/2012
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Grand Ridge
 
FL
 
300

 
76

 
684

 

 
760

 
(212
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Kissimmee
 
FL
 
970

 
643

 
1,071

 

 
1,714

 
(213
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
413

 
1,810

 

 
2,223

 
(385
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Molino
 
FL
 
400

 
178

 
1,007

 

 
1,185

 
(317
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Palatka
 
FL
 

 
113

 
1,196

 

 
1,309

 
(244
)
 
5/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Panama City
 
FL
 

 
139

 
312

 

 
451

 
(83
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1987
Dollar General
 
Guyton
 
GA
 

 
213

 
852

 

 
1,065

 
(217
)
 
6/3/2013
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Lyerly
 
GA
 

 
251

 
992

 

 
1,243

 
(213
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Shiloh
 
GA
 

 
150

 
743

 

 
893

 
(168
)
 
8/13/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Thomaston
 
GA
 

 
308

 
972

 

 
1,280

 
(213
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Cedar Falls
 
IA
 

 
96

 
862

 

 
958

 
(212
)
 
8/28/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Center Point
 
IA
 

 
136

 
772

 

 
908

 
(218
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Chariton
 
IA
 

 
165

 
934

 

 
1,099

 
(272
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Eagle Grove
 
IA
 

 
100

 
902

 

 
1,002

 
(226
)
 
7/9/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Estherville
 
IA
 

 
226

 
903

 

 
1,129

 
(259
)
 
10/25/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Hampton
 
IA
 

 
188

 
751

 

 
939

 
(229
)
 
2/1/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lake Mills
 
IA
 

 
81

 
728

 

 
809

 
(222
)
 
2/1/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Nashua
 
IA
 

 
136

 
768

 

 
904

 
(222
)
 
9/6/2012
 
2012

F-106



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Ottumwa
 
IA
 

 
143

 
812

 

 
955

 
(226
)
 
1/31/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Altamont
 
IL
 

 
211

 
844

 

 
1,055

 
(256
)
 
3/9/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Carthage
 
IL
 

 
48

 
908

 

 
956

 
(264
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Desoto
 
IL
 

 
138

 
784

 

 
922

 
(211
)
 
3/26/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Fairbury
 
IL
 

 
96

 
867

 

 
963

 
(221
)
 
6/7/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Galatia
 
IL
 

 
87

 
1,008

 

 
1,095

 
(144
)
 
7/29/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Henry
 
IL
 

 
104

 
934

 

 
1,038

 
(243
)
 
5/23/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Jacksonville
 
IL
 

 
145

 
823

 

 
968

 
(240
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Jonesboro
 
IL
 

 
77

 
309

 

 
386

 
(97
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2007
Dollar General
 
Lexington
 
IL
 

 
100

 
899

 

 
999

 
(260
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Mackinaw
 
IL
 

 
149

 
1,011

 

 
1,160

 
(223
)
 
2/25/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Mahomet
 
IL
 

 
292

 
877

 

 
1,169

 
(215
)
 
8/22/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Marion
 
IL
 

 
153

 
867

 

 
1,020

 
(251
)
 
9/24/2012
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Minonk
 
IL
 

 
56

 
1,034

 

 
1,090

 
(152
)
 
7/2/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Mount Morris
 
IL
 

 
97

 
877

 

 
974

 
(247
)
 
12/17/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Park Forest
 
IL
 

 
390

 
1,036

 

 
1,426

 
(141
)
 
8/1/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Pittsburg
 
IL
 

 
97

 
915

 

 
1,012

 
(196
)
 
3/31/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Rockford
 
IL
 

 
464

 
597

 
27

 
1,088

 
(97
)
 
6/18/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Roodhouse
 
IL
 

 
207

 
829

 

 
1,036

 
(234
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Savanna
 
IL
 

 
273

 
1,093

 

 
1,366

 
(308
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
South Pekin
 
IL
 

 
104

 
933

 

 
1,037

 
(229
)
 
8/14/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Bainbridge
 
IN
 

 
131

 
765

 

 
896

 
(111
)
 
9/22/2014
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Medaryville
 
IN
 

 
96

 
914

 

 
1,010

 
(212
)
 
7/31/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Monroeville
 
IN
 

 
112

 
636

 

 
748

 
(197
)
 
12/22/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Porter
 
IN
 

 
243

 
995

 

 
1,238

 
(97
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Rensselaer
 
IN
 

 
111

 
957

 

 
1,068

 
(157
)
 
7/30/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Richland
 
IN
 

 
156

 
887

 

 
1,043

 
(96
)
 
4/30/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Schneider
 
IN
 

 
124

 
1,010

 

 
1,134

 
(143
)
 
9/17/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Auburn
 
KS
 

 
42

 
801

 

 
843

 
(233
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Cottonwood Falls
 
KS
 

 
89

 
802

 

 
891

 
(234
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Erie
 
KS
 

 
42

 
790

 

 
832

 
(230
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Garden City
 
KS
 

 
136

 
771

 

 
907

 
(225
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010

F-107



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Harper
 
KS
 

 
91

 
818

 

 
909

 
(238
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Humboldt
 
KS
 

 
44

 
828

 

 
872

 
(241
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Kingman
 
KS
 

 
142

 
804

 

 
946

 
(234
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Medicine Lodge
 
KS
 

 
40

 
765

 

 
805

 
(223
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Minneapolis
 
KS
 

 
43

 
816

 

 
859

 
(238
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Pomona
 
KS
 

 
42

 
796

 

 
838

 
(232
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Sedan
 
KS
 

 
42

 
792

 

 
834

 
(231
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Syracuse
 
KS
 

 
43

 
817

 

 
860

 
(238
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Berea
 
KY
 

 
138

 
781

 

 
919

 
(203
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Coldiron
 
KY
 

 
187

 
747

 

 
934

 
(194
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
East Bernstadt
 
KY
 

 
141

 
799

 

 
940

 
(208
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Eubank
 
KY
 

 
137

 
775

 

 
912

 
(201
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Monticello
 
KY
 

 
251

 
867

 

 
1,118

 
(181
)
 
4/25/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Nancy
 
KY
 

 
81

 
733

 

 
814

 
(220
)
 
4/26/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Whitesburg
 
KY
 

 
211

 
845

 

 
1,056

 
(220
)
 
5/30/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bastrop
 
LA
 

 
148

 
838

 

 
986

 
(210
)
 
7/1/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Choudrant
 
LA
 
300

 
83

 
745

 

 
828

 
(228
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Converse
 
LA
 

 
84

 
756

 

 
840

 
(218
)
 
9/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Doyline
 
LA
 

 
88

 
793

 

 
881

 
(226
)
 
11/27/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Gardner
 
LA
 

 
138

 
784

 

 
922

 
(238
)
 
3/8/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Grambling
 
LA
 

 
597

 
719

 

 
1,316

 
(165
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Jonesville
 
LA
 

 
103

 
929

 

 
1,032

 
(269
)
 
9/27/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Keithville
 
LA
 

 
83

 
750

 

 
833

 
(220
)
 
7/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lake Charles
 
LA
 

 
102

 
919

 

 
1,021

 
(281
)
 
2/29/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lake Charles
 
LA
 

 
406

 
770

 

 
1,176

 
(169
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Mangham
 
LA
 
300

 
40

 
759

 

 
799

 
(232
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Monroe
 
LA
 
400

 
97

 
869

 

 
966

 
(265
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Mount Hermon
 
LA
 
400

 
94

 
842

 

 
936

 
(257
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
New Iberia
 
LA
 

 
315

 
736

 

 
1,051

 
(221
)
 
4/26/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Patterson
 
LA
 

 
259

 
1,035

 

 
1,294

 
(311
)
 
4/26/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Sarepta
 
LA
 

 
131

 
743

 

 
874

 
(217
)
 
8/9/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
St. Martinville
 
LA
 

 
175

 
1,028

 

 
1,203

 
(225
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012

F-108



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Thibodaux
 
LA
 

 
234

 
1,146

 

 
1,380

 
(253
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
West Monroe
 
LA
 

 
153

 
869

 

 
1,022

 
(263
)
 
3/9/2012
 
1995
Dollar General
 
Zachary
 
LA
 

 
248

 
743

 

 
991

 
(224
)
 
4/26/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Adams
 
MA
 

 
254

 
1,016

 

 
1,270

 
(240
)
 
10/10/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bangor
 
MI
 

 
173

 
691

 

 
864

 
(203
)
 
7/10/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bronson
 
MI
 

 
97

 
436

 

 
533

 
(163
)
 
8/6/2014
 
1965
Dollar General
 
Cadillac
 
MI
 

 
187

 
747

 

 
934

 
(226
)
 
3/16/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Camden
 
MI
 

 
138

 
781

 

 
919

 
(214
)
 
2/27/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Carleton
 
MI
 

 
222

 
666

 

 
888

 
(202
)
 
3/16/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Covert
 
MI
 

 
37

 
704

 

 
741

 
(205
)
 
8/30/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Durand
 
MI
 

 
181

 
726

 

 
907

 
(217
)
 
5/18/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
East Jordan
 
MI
 

 
125

 
709

 

 
834

 
(208
)
 
7/10/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
83

 
743

 

 
826

 
(222
)
 
5/18/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
91

 
820

 

 
911

 
(235
)
 
10/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Gaylord
 
MI
 

 
172

 
687

 

 
859

 
(202
)
 
7/10/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Iron River
 
MI
 

 
86

 
777

 

 
863

 
(226
)
 
8/30/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Manchester
 
MI
 

 
213

 
853

 

 
1,066

 
(234
)
 
2/27/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Manistique
 
MI
 

 
155

 
876

 

 
1,031

 
(240
)
 
2/27/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Melvindale
 
MI
 

 
242

 
967

 

 
1,209

 
(286
)
 
6/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Mount Morris
 
MI
 

 
110

 
988

 

 
1,098

 
(271
)
 
2/27/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Negaunee
 
MI
 

 
87

 
779

 

 
866

 
(227
)
 
8/30/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Rapid City
 
MI
 

 
179

 
716

 

 
895

 
(196
)
 
2/27/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Romulus
 
MI
 

 
199

 
794

 

 
993

 
(217
)
 
2/27/2013
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Roscommon
 
MI
 

 
87

 
781

 

 
868

 
(228
)
 
8/30/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Wakefield
 
MI
 

 
88

 
794

 

 
882

 
(224
)
 
12/19/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Albert Lea
 
MN
 

 
223

 
551

 
(46
)
 
728

 
(89
)
 
5/30/2014
 
1960
Dollar General
 
Annandale
 
MN
 

 
212

 
848

 

 
1,060

 
(208
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Barnesville
 
MN
 

 
86

 
841

 

 
927

 
(184
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Cohasset
 
MN
 

 
87

 
964

 

 
1,051

 
(196
)
 
5/2/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Ely
 
MN
 

 
174

 
944

 

 
1,118

 
(101
)
 
4/30/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Hawley
 
MN
 

 
89

 
803

 

 
892

 
(190
)
 
10/16/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Melrose
 
MN
 

 
96

 
863

 

 
959

 
(243
)
 
12/17/2012
 
2012

F-109



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Milaca
 
MN
 

 
102

 
916

 

 
1,018

 
(221
)
 
9/24/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Montgomery
 
MN
 

 
87

 
783

 

 
870

 
(221
)
 
12/17/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Olivia
 
MN
 

 
98

 
884

 

 
982

 
(246
)
 
1/31/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Pequot Lakes
 
MN
 

 
155

 
880

 

 
1,035

 
(216
)
 
8/22/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Richmond
 
MN
 

 
96

 
836

 

 
932

 
(182
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Roseau
 
MN
 

 
143

 
808

 

 
951

 
(191
)
 
10/30/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Rush City
 
MN
 

 
126

 
716

 

 
842

 
(210
)
 
7/25/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Springfield
 
MN
 

 
88

 
795

 

 
883

 
(224
)
 
12/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Staples
 
MN
 

 
150

 
848

 

 
998

 
(205
)
 
9/4/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Virginia
 
MN
 

 
147

 
831

 

 
978

 
(232
)
 
1/14/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Appleton City
 
MO
 

 
22

 
124

 

 
146

 
(39
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2004
Dollar General
 
Ash Grove
 
MO
 

 
35

 
315

 

 
350

 
(98
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2006
Dollar General
 
Ashland
 
MO
 

 
70

 
398

 
37

 
505

 
(123
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2006
Dollar General
 
Aurora
 
MO
 

 
98

 
881

 

 
979

 
(241
)
 
2/28/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Auxvasse
 
MO
 
300

 
72

 
650

 

 
722

 
(203
)
 
11/22/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Belton
 
MO
 

 
105

 
948

 

 
1,053

 
(276
)
 
8/3/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Berkeley
 
MO
 

 
132

 
748

 

 
880

 
(215
)
 
10/9/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bernie
 
MO
 

 
35

 
314

 

 
349

 
(98
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2007
Dollar General
 
Billings
 
MO
 

 
139

 
790

 

 
929

 
(187
)
 
10/17/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Bloomfield
 
MO
 

 
23

 
215

 

 
238

 
(66
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2005
Dollar General
 
Cardwell
 
MO
 

 
89

 
805

 

 
894

 
(235
)
 
8/24/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Carterville
 
MO
 

 
10

 
192

 

 
202

 
(60
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2004
Dollar General
 
Caruthersville
 
MO
 

 
98

 
878

 

 
976

 
(254
)
 
9/27/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Caulfield
 
MO
 

 
139

 
789

 

 
928

 
(223
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Clarkton
 
MO
 

 
19

 
354

 

 
373

 
(111
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2007
Dollar General
 
Clever
 
MO
 

 
136

 
542

 

 
678

 
(161
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Conway
 
MO
 
300

 
37

 
694

 

 
731

 
(217
)
 
11/22/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
De Soto
 
MO
 

 
101

 
912

 

 
1,013

 
(250
)
 
2/14/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Diamond
 
MO
 

 
44

 
175

 

 
219

 
(55
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2005
Dollar General
 
Doolittle
 
MO
 

 
137

 
778

 

 
915

 
(191
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Eagle Rock
 
MO
 

 
133

 
786

 

 
919

 
(172
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Edina
 
MO
 

 
127

 
722

 

 
849

 
(209
)
 
9/13/2012
 
2012

F-110



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Eldon
 
MO
 

 
52

 
986

 

 
1,038

 
(270
)
 
2/14/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Ellsinore
 
MO
 

 
30

 
579

 

 
609

 
(181
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Gower
 
MO
 

 
118

 
668

 

 
786

 
(195
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Hallsville
 
MO
 

 
29

 
263

 
(6
)
 
286

 
(81
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2004
Dollar General
 
Hawk Point
 
MO
 

 
177

 
709

 

 
886

 
(206
)
 
8/24/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Humansville
 
MO
 

 
69

 
277

 

 
346

 
(82
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2007
Dollar General
 
Jennings
 
MO
 

 
445

 
826

 

 
1,271

 
(243
)
 
7/13/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Joplin
 
MO
 

 
144

 
816

 

 
960

 
(189
)
 
11/12/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
313

 
731

 

 
1,044

 
(211
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
King City
 
MO
 
300

 
33

 
625

 

 
658

 
(195
)
 
11/22/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Laurie
 
MO
 

 
102

 
918

 

 
1,020

 
(213
)
 
11/15/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Lawson
 
MO
 

 
29

 
162

 
(3
)
 
188

 
(50
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2003
Dollar General
 
Lebanon
 
MO
 

 
177

 
708

 

 
885

 
(205
)
 
9/24/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lebanon
 
MO
 

 
278

 
835

 

 
1,113

 
(241
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lexington
 
MO
 

 
149

 
846

 

 
995

 
(204
)
 
9/13/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Licking
 
MO
 
300

 
76

 
688

 

 
764

 
(215
)
 
11/22/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Lilbourn
 
MO
 

 
62

 
554

 

 
616

 
(173
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Lonedell
 
MO
 

 
208

 
833

 

 
1,041

 
(220
)
 
4/26/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Malden
 
MO
 

 
108

 
974

 

 
1,082

 
(239
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Marble Hill
 
MO
 

 
104

 
935

 

 
1,039

 
(270
)
 
9/11/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Marionville
 
MO
 

 
89

 
797

 

 
886

 
(228
)
 
10/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Marthasville
 
MO
 
300

 
41

 
782

 

 
823

 
(239
)
 
2/1/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Maysville
 
MO
 
300

 
107

 
607

 

 
714

 
(191
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Morehouse
 
MO
 

 
87

 
783

 

 
870

 
(226
)
 
9/7/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
New Haven
 
MO
 

 
176

 
702

 

 
878

 
(211
)
 
4/27/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Oak Grove
 
MO
 

 
27

 
106

 
64

 
197

 
(32
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1999
Dollar General
 
Oran
 
MO
 

 
83

 
747

 

 
830

 
(226
)
 
3/30/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Osceola
 
MO
 

 
93

 
835

 

 
928

 
(229
)
 
2/19/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Ozark
 
MO
 

 
190

 
758

 

 
948

 
(228
)
 
4/27/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Ozark
 
MO
 

 
149

 
842

 

 
991

 
(243
)
 
9/24/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Pacific
 
MO
 

 
151

 
853

 

 
1,004

 
(253
)
 
6/6/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Palmyra
 
MO
 

 
40

 
225

 
(3
)
 
262

 
(66
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2003

F-111



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Plattsburg
 
MO
 

 
44

 
843

 

 
887

 
(246
)
 
8/9/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Qulin
 
MO
 

 
30

 
573

 
(8
)
 
595

 
(178
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Robertsville
 
MO
 

 
131

 
744

 

 
875

 
(217
)
 
8/24/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Rocky Mount
 
MO
 

 
88

 
789

 

 
877

 
(230
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Rolla
 
MO
 

 
209

 
835

 

 
1,044

 
(205
)
 
8/21/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Savannah
 
MO
 

 
270

 
811

 

 
1,081

 
(199
)
 
8/23/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Sedadia
 
MO
 

 
273

 
637

 

 
910

 
(184
)
 
9/7/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Senath
 
MO
 

 
61

 
552

 

 
613

 
(163
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Seneca
 
MO
 

 
47

 
189

 
180

 
416

 
(56
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1962
Dollar General
 
Shelbina
 
MO
 

 
101

 
911

 

 
1,012

 
(237
)
 
5/22/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Sikeston
 
MO
 

 
56

 
1,056

 

 
1,112

 
(322
)
 
2/24/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Sikeston
 
MO
 

 
144

 
819

 

 
963

 
(239
)
 
8/24/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Springfield
 
MO
 

 
378

 
702

 

 
1,080

 
(208
)
 
6/14/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
St. Clair
 
MO
 
400

 
220

 
879

 

 
1,099

 
(272
)
 
12/30/2011
 
1995
Dollar General
 
St. James
 
MO
 

 
81

 
244

 

 
325

 
(72
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1999
Dollar General
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
372

 
692

 

 
1,064

 
(202
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
260

 
606

 

 
866

 
(175
)
 
9/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
215

 
1,219

 

 
1,434

 
(322
)
 
4/30/2013
 
1995
Dollar General
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
445

 
1,039

 

 
1,484

 
(293
)
 
12/14/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Stanberry
 
MO
 
300

 
111

 
629

 

 
740

 
(197
)
 
11/22/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Steele
 
MO
 

 
31

 
598

 

 
629

 
(187
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Strafford
 
MO
 

 
51

 
471

 

 
522

 
(145
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Vienna
 
MO
 

 
78

 
704

 

 
782

 
(215
)
 
2/24/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
West Plains
 
MO
 

 
90

 
769

 

 
859

 
(168
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Willow Springs
 
MO
 

 
24

 
213

 
(4
)
 
233

 
(63
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2002
Dollar General
 
Windsor
 
MO
 

 
86

 
829

 

 
915

 
(181
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Edwards
 
MS
 
300

 
75

 
671

 

 
746

 
(208
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Greenville
 
MS
 
300

 
82

 
739

 

 
821

 
(229
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Hickory
 
MS
 

 
77

 
692

 

 
769

 
(203
)
 
7/2/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Jackson
 
MS
 

 
198

 
793

 

 
991

 
(229
)
 
9/27/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Meridian
 
MS
 

 
178

 
713

 

 
891

 
(206
)
 
9/13/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Meridian
 
MS
 

 
40

 
754

 

 
794

 
(218
)
 
9/13/2012
 
2011

F-112



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Moorhead
 
MS
 

 
107

 
606

 

 
713

 
(181
)
 
5/1/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Natchez
 
MS
 

 
166

 
664

 

 
830

 
(197
)
 
6/12/2012
 
2012

F-113



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Soso
 
MS
 

 
116

 
658

 

 
774

 
(198
)
 
4/12/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Stonewall
 
MS
 

 
116

 
655

 

 
771

 
(192
)
 
7/2/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Stringer
 
MS
 

 
116

 
655

 

 
771

 
(193
)
 
7/2/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Walnut Grove
 
MS
 
300

 
71

 
641

 

 
712

 
(199
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Edenton
 
NC
 

 
240

 
1,025

 

 
1,265

 
(225
)
 
2/28/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 
300

 
216

 
647

 

 
863

 
(198
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Hendersonville
 
NC
 

 
360

 
1,034

 

 
1,394

 
(224
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Hickory
 
NC
 

 
89

 
804

 

 
893

 
(234
)
 
8/13/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Morganton
 
NC
 

 
472

 
1,108

 

 
1,580

 
(243
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Ocean Isle Beach
 
NC
 
400

 
341

 
633

 

 
974

 
(193
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Tryon
 
NC
 

 
139

 
789

 

 
928

 
(230
)
 
8/13/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Vass
 
NC
 
300

 
226

 
528

 

 
754

 
(161
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Farmington
 
NM
 

 
269

 
807

 

 
1,076

 
(233
)
 
9/6/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Farmington
 
NM
 

 
224

 
898

 

 
1,122

 
(225
)
 
7/11/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Modena
 
NY
 

 
249

 
996

 

 
1,245

 
(235
)
 
10/10/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Fairfield
 
OH
 

 
131

 
1,272

 

 
1,403

 
(262
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Forest
 
OH
 
300

 
76

 
681

 

 
757

 
(214
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Gratis
 
OH
 

 
161

 
1,042

 

 
1,203

 
(229
)
 
2/18/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Greenfield
 
OH
 
400

 
110

 
986

 

 
1,096

 
(301
)
 
2/23/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Hicksville
 
OH
 

 
156

 
1,490

 

 
1,646

 
(309
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Loudonville
 
OH
 

 
236

 
945

 

 
1,181

 
(280
)
 
6/6/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lowell
 
OH
 

 
157

 
1,114

 

 
1,271

 
(232
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lucasville
 
OH
 

 
223

 
893

 

 
1,116

 
(267
)
 
5/16/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
New Charlisle
 
OH
 

 
215

 
860

 

 
1,075

 
(253
)
 
7/10/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
New Matamoras
 
OH
 
300

 
123

 
696

 

 
819

 
(219
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Payne
 
OH
 
300

 
81

 
729

 

 
810

 
(230
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Pemberville
 
OH
 

 
146

 
1,059

 

 
1,205

 
(224
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Pleasant City
 
OH
 
300

 
131

 
740

 

 
871

 
(233
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Powhatan Point
 
OH
 

 
138

 
784

 

 
922

 
(196
)
 
7/2/2013
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Sandusky
 
OH
 

 
210

 
1,700

 

 
1,910

 
(353
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Toledo
 
OH
 

 
252

 
1,149

 

 
1,401

 
(241
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Wheelersburg
 
OH
 

 
395

 
1,132

 

 
1,527

 
(247
)
 
2/25/2014
 
1925

F-114



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Broken Bow
 
OK
 

 
331

 
1,325

 

 
1,656

 
(242
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Calera
 
OK
 

 
136

 
770

 

 
906

 
(224
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Commerce
 
OK
 

 
38

 
341

 
(6
)
 
373

 
(106
)
 
11/10/2011
 
2006
Dollar General
 
Hartshorne
 
OK
 

 
100

 
898

 

 
998

 
(262
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Lexington
 
OK
 

 
85

 
761

 

 
846

 
(222
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Maud
 
OK
 

 
76

 
688

 

 
764

 
(200
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Maysville
 
OK
 

 
41

 
785

 

 
826

 
(229
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Ponca City
 
OK
 

 
145

 
1,161

 

 
1,306

 
(240
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Rush Spring
 
OK
 

 
87

 
779

 

 
866

 
(227
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Sand Springs
 
OK
 

 
143

 
811

 

 
954

 
(196
)
 
9/3/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Sand Springs
 
OK
 

 
43

 
819

 

 
862

 
(197
)
 
9/3/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Sand Springs
 
OK
 

 
198

 
791

 

 
989

 
(191
)
 
9/3/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Tahlequah
 
OK
 

 
123

 
1,101

 

 
1,224

 
(227
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Wagoner
 
OK
 

 
31

 
1,076

 

 
1,107

 
(223
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Pleasantville
 
PA
 

 
163

 
941

 

 
1,104

 
(201
)
 
3/24/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Sykesville
 
PA
 

 
68

 
1,075

 

 
1,143

 
(229
)
 
3/24/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Wattsburg
 
PA
 

 
96

 
1,031

 

 
1,127

 
(220
)
 
3/24/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Holly Hill
 
SC
 
1,983

 
259

 
2,333

 

 
2,592

 
(628
)
 
3/6/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
West Union
 
SC
 

 
46

 
868

 

 
914

 
(217
)
 
7/3/2013
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Doyle
 
TN
 

 
75

 
679

 

 
754

 
(198
)
 
8/22/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Manchester
 
TN
 

 
114

 
646

 

 
760

 
(190
)
 
7/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Mcminnville
 
TN
 

 
120

 
679

 

 
799

 
(199
)
 
7/12/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Pleasant Hill
 
TN
 
300

 
39

 
747

 

 
786

 
(232
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Adkins
 
TX
 

 
157

 
889

 

 
1,046

 
(251
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
97

 
877

 

 
974

 
(215
)
 
8/13/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
153

 
866

 

 
1,019

 
(213
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
198

 
794

 

 
992

 
(199
)
 
7/11/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Avinger
 
TX
 

 
44

 
830

 

 
874

 
(204
)
 
8/8/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Beeville
 
TX
 

 
90

 
810

 

 
900

 
(230
)
 
11/19/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Belton
 
TX
 

 
89

 
804

 

 
893

 
(220
)
 
2/28/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Belton
 
TX
 

 
145

 
821

 

 
966

 
(237
)
 
9/13/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Blessing
 
TX
 

 
83

 
745

 

 
828

 
(210
)
 
12/18/2012
 
2012

F-115



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Boling
 
TX
 

 
92

 
831

 

 
923

 
(204
)
 
8/13/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Brookeland
 
TX
 

 
93

 
840

 

 
933

 
(207
)
 
8/15/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Bryan
 
TX
 

 
148

 
840

 

 
988

 
(243
)
 
9/14/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bryan
 
TX
 

 
193

 
772

 

 
965

 
(223
)
 
9/14/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Bryan
 
TX
 

 
185

 
740

 

 
925

 
(216
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Buchanan Dam
 
TX
 

 
145

 
820

 

 
965

 
(237
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Canyon Lake
 
TX
 

 
149

 
843

 

 
992

 
(242
)
 
10/12/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Cedar Creek
 
TX
 

 
291

 
680

 

 
971

 
(193
)
 
11/16/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Como
 
TX
 

 
76

 
683

 

 
759

 
(205
)
 
4/20/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
270

 
809

 

 
1,079

 
(228
)
 
12/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Diana
 
TX
 

 
186

 
743

 

 
929

 
(183
)
 
8/27/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Donna
 
TX
 

 
136

 
768

 

 
904

 
(222
)
 
9/11/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Donna
 
TX
 

 
200

 
799

 

 
999

 
(229
)
 
10/12/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Donna
 
TX
 

 
145

 
820

 

 
965

 
(228
)
 
1/31/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
136

 
769

 

 
905

 
(222
)
 
9/7/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
102

 
914

 

 
1,016

 
(229
)
 
7/16/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Elmendorf
 
TX
 

 
94

 
847

 

 
941

 
(243
)
 
10/23/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Ganado
 
TX
 

 
95

 
857

 

 
952

 
(211
)
 
8/13/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Gladewater
 
TX
 

 
184

 
736

 

 
920

 
(214
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
Gordonville
 
TX
 

 
38

 
717

 

 
755

 
(216
)
 
4/20/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Kyle
 
TX
 

 
132

 
747

 

 
879

 
(216
)
 
9/26/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Kyle
 
TX
 

 
101

 
910

 

 
1,011

 
(207
)
 
12/6/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
La Marque
 
TX
 

 
102

 
917

 

 
1,019

 
(267
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Lacy Lakeview
 
TX
 

 
146

 
826

 

 
972

 
(235
)
 
11/16/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Laredo
 
TX
 

 
253

 
758

 

 
1,011

 
(223
)
 
7/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Littleriver Acdmy
 
TX
 

 
122

 
693

 

 
815

 
(209
)
 
4/27/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
267

 
801

 

 
1,068

 
(233
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
199

 
796

 

 
995

 
(196
)
 
8/28/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
148

 
841

 

 
989

 
(219
)
 
5/16/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
41

 
825

 

 
866

 
(180
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Lyford
 
TX
 
300

 
80

 
724

 

 
804

 
(225
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Lytle
 
TX
 

 
243

 
971

 

 
1,214

 
(230
)
 
10/30/2013
 
2013

F-116



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Mercedes
 
TX
 

 
215

 
859

 

 
1,074

 
(211
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Mission
 
TX
 

 
158

 
894

 

 
1,052

 
(241
)
 
3/27/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Moody
 
TX
 

 
41

 
781

 

 
822

 
(199
)
 
6/11/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Mount Pleasant
 
TX
 

 
214

 
858

 

 
1,072

 
(250
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2009
Dollar General
 
New Braunfels
 
TX
 

 
205

 
818

 

 
1,023

 
(238
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
New Braunfels
 
TX
 

 
95

 
855

 

 
950

 
(234
)
 
2/14/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
New Braunfels
 
TX
 

 
156

 
883

 

 
1,039

 
(209
)
 
10/30/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Orange
 
TX
 

 
277

 
1,150

 

 
1,427

 
(230
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Poteet
 
TX
 
400

 
96

 
864

 

 
960

 
(272
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Presidio
 
TX
 

 
72

 
1,370

 

 
1,442

 
(369
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Progreso
 
TX
 
400

 
169

 
957

 

 
1,126

 
(301
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Rio Grande City
 
TX
 
300

 
137

 
779

 

 
916

 
(245
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Rio Grande City
 
TX
 

 
163

 
652

 

 
815

 
(199
)
 
2/1/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Roma
 
TX
 
500

 
253

 
1,010

 

 
1,263

 
(318
)
 
10/31/2011
 
2010
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
252

 
756

 

 
1,008

 
(217
)
 
10/22/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
222

 
888

 

 
1,110

 
(255
)
 
10/22/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
163

 
926

 

 
1,089

 
(254
)
 
2/14/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
271

 
812

 

 
1,083

 
(211
)
 
5/23/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
239

 
956

 

 
1,195

 
(257
)
 
3/11/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
220

 
880

 

 
1,100

 
(220
)
 
7/9/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
333

 
776

 

 
1,109

 
(191
)
 
8/13/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Benito
 
TX
 

 
202

 
807

 

 
1,009

 
(198
)
 
8/23/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Juan
 
TX
 

 
169

 
956

 

 
1,125

 
(222
)
 
11/15/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
San Leon
 
TX
 

 
87

 
786

 

 
873

 
(227
)
 
9/25/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Silsbee
 
TX
 

 
43

 
810

 

 
853

 
(238
)
 
7/6/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Skidmore
 
TX
 

 
90

 
811

 

 
901

 
(222
)
 
2/14/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Sullivan City
 
TX
 

 
165

 
876

 

 
1,041

 
(191
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Dollar General
 
Texarkana
 
TX
 

 
136

 
772

 

 
908

 
(182
)
 
10/25/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Troy
 
TX
 

 
93

 
841

 

 
934

 
(243
)
 
9/12/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Tyler
 
TX
 

 
219

 
875

 

 
1,094

 
(255
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2010
Dollar General
 
Tyler
 
TX
 

 
602

 
956

 

 
1,558

 
(212
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Victoria
 
TX
 

 
91

 
817

 

 
908

 
(228
)
 
1/31/2013
 
2013

F-117



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dollar General
 
Vidor
 
TX
 

 

 
1,182

 

 
1,182

 
(237
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Waco
 
TX
 

 
192

 
767

 

 
959

 
(223
)
 
8/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Weslaco
 
TX
 

 
215

 
862

 

 
1,077

 
(249
)
 
9/24/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Weslaco
 
TX
 

 
205

 
822

 

 
1,027

 
(194
)
 
10/16/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Burkeville
 
VA
 

 
160

 
906

 

 
1,066

 
(270
)
 
5/8/2012
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Danville
 
VA
 
300

 
155

 
621

 

 
776

 
(190
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Hopewell
 
VA
 
500

 
584

 
713

 

 
1,297

 
(218
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Hot Springs
 
VA
 
400

 
283

 
661

 

 
944

 
(202
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Richmond
 
VA
 
400

 
242

 
726

 

 
968

 
(222
)
 
2/6/2012
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Mellen
 
WI
 
300

 
79

 
711

 

 
790

 
(221
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Minong
 
WI
 
300

 
38

 
727

 

 
765

 
(225
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Solon Springs
 
WI
 
300

 
76

 
685

 

 
761

 
(212
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Dollar General
 
Chelyan
 
WV
 

 
273

 
1,092

 

 
1,365

 
(263
)
 
9/27/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Cowen
 
WV
 

 
196

 
783

 

 
979

 
(218
)
 
1/16/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Elkview
 
WV
 

 
274

 
823

 

 
1,097

 
(202
)
 
8/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Mcmechen
 
WV
 

 
91

 
819

 

 
910

 
(228
)
 
1/9/2013
 
2012
Dollar General
 
Millwood
 
WV
 

 
98

 
881

 

 
979

 
(221
)
 
7/2/2013
 
2013
Dollar General
 
Oceana
 
WV
 

 
317

 
1,023

 

 
1,340

 
(146
)
 
11/20/2014
 
2014
Dollar Tree
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
476

 
1,092

 

 
1,568

 
(153
)
 
8/29/2014
 
2014
Dollar Tree
 
Beverly Hills
 
FL
 

 
409

 
965

 

 
1,374

 
(141
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Dollar Tree
 
Bonita Springs
 
FL
 

 
672

 
918

 

 
1,590

 
(207
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Dollar Tree
 
Chiefland
 
FL
 

 
322

 
1,123

 

 
1,445

 
(239
)
 
3/31/2014
 
2013
Dollar Tree
 
Ormond Beach
 
FL
 

 
573

 
860

 

 
1,433

 
(219
)
 
6/4/2013
 
2008
Dollar Tree
 
Oviedo
 
FL
 

 
469

 
848

 

 
1,317

 
(186
)
 
2/19/2014
 
2013
Dollar Tree
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
152

 
863

 
6

 
1,021

 
(213
)
 
8/30/2013
 
1995
Dollar Tree
 
Lombard
 
IL
 

 
1,008

 
543

 

 
1,551

 
(123
)
 
12/12/2013
 
1967
Dollar Tree
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
377

 
716

 

 
1,093

 
(160
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Dollar Tree
 
Burton
 
MI
 
866

 
131

 
1,164

 

 
1,295

 
(252
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Dollar Tree
 
Winona
 
MS
 

 
146

 
585

 

 
731

 
(172
)
 
7/31/2012
 
2012
Dollar Tree
 
Hoosick Falls
 
NY
 

 
181

 
724

 

 
905

 
(191
)
 
4/26/2013
 
2013
Duluth Trading Co
 
Avon
 
OH
 

 
1,088

 
3,671

 

 
4,759

 
(27
)
 
10/20/2017
 
2017
Duluth Trading Co
 
Waukesha
 
WI
 

 
857

 
4,067

 

 
4,924

 
(5
)
 
12/14/2017
 
2017

F-118



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Dunkin Donuts/Baskin-Robbins
 
Dearborn Heights
 
MI
 

 
230

 
846

 

 
1,076

 
(209
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Earhart Corporate Center
 
Ann Arbor
 
MI
 
27,070

 
3,520

 
39,639

 
(7,267
)
 
35,892

 
(2,366
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2006
Eastchase Central
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
1,480

 
9,117

 

 
10,597

 
(39
)
 
11/17/2017
 
2017
Eegee's
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
357

 
436

 

 
793

 
(102
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Einstein Bros. Bagels
 
Dearborn
 
MI
 

 
190

 
724

 

 
914

 
(179
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
El Chico
 
Killeen
 
TX
 

 
534

 
992

 
(803
)
 
723

 
(75
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Elite Production Services
 
Cuero
 
TX
 

 
127

 
982

 

 
1,109

 
(155
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2014
EMC Corporation
 
Bedford
 
MA
 
51,345

 
16,594

 
75,137

 
203

 
91,934

 
(13,547
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Emdeon Business Services
 
Nashville
 
TN
 
4,700

 
688

 
10,417

 

 
11,105

 
(1,690
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Energy Maintenance Services US
 
Pasadena
 
TX
 

 
393

 
2,878

 

 
3,271

 
(454
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2011
Evans Exchange
 
Evans
 
GA
 
6,517

 
3,452

 
9,821

 
18

 
13,291

 
(2,010
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Experian
 
Schaumburg
 
IL
 

 
5,935

 
26,003

 
(5,777
)
 
26,161

 
(1,911
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1986
Express Energy Services
 
Pleasanton
 
TX
 

 
413

 
5,541

 

 
5,954

 
(877
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2012
Express Scripts
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
5,706

 
32,333

 

 
38,039

 
(10,515
)
 
1/25/2012
 
2011
Exterran Energy Solutions
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
1,360

 
5,704

 

 
7,064

 
(895
)
 
9/5/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Bessemer
 
AL
 

 
295

 
1,301

 

 
1,596

 
(227
)
 
6/16/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Camden
 
AL
 

 
137

 
851

 

 
988

 
(162
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Grove Hill
 
AL
 

 
144

 
741

 

 
885

 
(108
)
 
7/24/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Hayneville
 
AL
 

 
172

 
722

 

 
894

 
(148
)
 
5/7/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Hoover
 
AL
 

 
368

 
1,153

 

 
1,521

 
(168
)
 
8/29/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
628

 
924

 

 
1,552

 
(115
)
 
1/12/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Jemison
 
AL
 
757

 
143

 
997

 

 
1,140

 
(217
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Marion
 
AL
 

 
247

 
780

 

 
1,027

 
(115
)
 
7/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Millbrook
 
AL
 

 
316

 
1,052

 

 
1,368

 
(152
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
218

 
847

 

 
1,065

 
(123
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 
959

 
533

 
936

 

 
1,469

 
(208
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Wilmer
 
AL
 

 
221

 
791

 

 
1,012

 
(149
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
El Dorado
 
AR
 

 
151

 
806

 

 
957

 
(136
)
 
8/28/2014
 
1988
Family Dollar
 
El Dorado
 
AR
 
663

 
49

 
1,003

 

 
1,052

 
(204
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Hot Springs
 
AR
 

 
247

 
845

 

 
1,092

 
(179
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Jacksonville
 
AR
 
571

 
155

 
758

 

 
913

 
(155
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 
467

 
125

 
629

 

 
754

 
(128
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002

F-119



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Ash Fork
 
AZ
 

 
123

 
1,015

 

 
1,138

 
(147
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Avondale
 
AZ
 
974

 
603

 
882

 

 
1,485

 
(197
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Casa Grande
 
AZ
 

 
454

 
313

 

 
767

 
(78
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Coolidge
 
AZ
 
603

 
126

 
785

 

 
911

 
(170
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
Duncan
 
AZ
 

 
98

 
895

 

 
993

 
(130
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Fort Mohave
 
AZ
 

 
302

 
571

 

 
873

 
(131
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Golden Valley
 
AZ
 

 
110

 
772

 

 
882

 
(131
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Guadalupe
 
AZ
 

 
400

 
584

 

 
984

 
(134
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Mohave Valley
 
AZ
 

 
302

 
281

 

 
583

 
(70
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
303

 
712

 

 
1,015

 
(118
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
416

 
1,229

 

 
1,645

 
(174
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013

F-120



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
1,109

 
767

 

 
1,876

 
(181
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 
1,040

 
504

 
1,079

 

 
1,583

 
(237
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Dacano
 
CO
 
757

 
155

 
959

 

 
1,114

 
(212
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Fort Lupton
 
CO
 
916

 
154

 
1,180

 

 
1,334

 
(259
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1961
Family Dollar
 
Rangely
 
CO
 

 
66

 
593

 

 
659

 
(177
)
 
5/4/2012
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
New Britain
 
CT
 

 
484

 
1,280

 
26

 
1,790

 
(176
)
 
10/14/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Wilmington
 
DE
 

 
540

 
1,218

 

 
1,758

 
(145
)
 
4/21/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Altha
 
FL
 

 
126

 
727

 

 
853

 
(163
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Anthony
 
FL
 

 
242

 
1,037

 

 
1,279

 
(154
)
 
10/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Apopka
 
FL
 
1,127

 
518

 
1,402

 

 
1,920

 
(282
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Auburndale
 
FL
 

 
314

 
951

 

 
1,265

 
(137
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Belleview
 
FL
 

 
332

 
829

 

 
1,161

 
(174
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Bristol
 
FL
 
631

 
202

 
727

 

 
929

 
(165
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Bunnell
 
FL
 

 
188

 
936

 

 
1,124

 
(137
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Cape Coral
 
FL
 

 
675

 
1,190

 

 
1,865

 
(255
)
 
3/5/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Citra
 
FL
 

 
47

 
1,038

 

 
1,085

 
(149
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Clearwater
 
FL
 

 
425

 
1,006

 

 
1,431

 
(141
)
 
8/22/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Deland
 
FL
 
1,057

 
492

 
1,293

 

 
1,785

 
(264
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Deltona
 
FL
 
686

 
171

 
1,074

 

 
1,245

 
(209
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Deltona
 
FL
 
1,042

 
206

 
1,578

 

 
1,784

 
(315
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Fort Meade
 
FL
 
417

 
211

 
606

 

 
817

 
(114
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
Fort Myers
 
FL
 
973

 
189

 
1,344

 

 
1,533

 
(281
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Fountain
 
FL
 

 
202

 
825

 

 
1,027

 
(121
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Gainesville
 
FL
 
1,002

 
423

 
1,263

 
(16
)
 
1,670

 
(256
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Graceville
 
FL
 

 
367

 
810

 

 
1,177

 
(171
)
 
4/30/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 
1,028

 
271

 
1,121

 

 
1,392

 
(221
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 
789

 
545

 
1,173

 

 
1,718

 
(241
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Family Dollar
 
Lake Alfred
 
FL
 

 
484

 
1,006

 

 
1,490

 
(114
)
 
12/23/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Lake City
 
FL
 
622

 
186

 
872

 

 
1,058

 
(178
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Lake Panasoffkee
 
FL
 

 
237

 
696

 

 
933

 
(150
)
 
3/25/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 
732

 
339

 
785

 

 
1,124

 
(172
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Largo
 
FL
 

 
844

 
962

 

 
1,806

 
(211
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013

F-121



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Middleburg
 
FL
 

 
274

 
822

 

 
1,096

 
(210
)
 
6/4/2013
 
2008
Family Dollar
 
Milton
 
FL
 
644

 
544

 
683

 

 
1,227

 
(130
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Mulberry
 
FL
 

 
131

 
1,156

 

 
1,287

 
(165
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Ocala
 
FL
 

 
108

 
816

 

 
924

 
(124
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Ocala
 
FL
 

 
344

 
1,251

 

 
1,595

 
(251
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Family Dollar
 
Ocala
 
FL
 
968

 
554

 
984

 

 
1,538

 
(212
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Okeechobee
 
FL
 
894

 
655

 
580

 

 
1,235

 
(148
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
349

 
1,294

 

 
1,643

 
(182
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
291

 
1,286

 

 
1,577

 
(181
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Ormond Beach
 
FL
 

 
675

 
1,152

 

 
1,827

 
(233
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Palatka
 
FL
 

 
316

 
1,054

 

 
1,370

 
(221
)
 
4/25/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Pembroke Park
 
FL
 
1,141

 
656

 
944

 

 
1,600

 
(225
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Family Dollar
 
Pensacola
 
FL
 

 
69

 
1,085

 

 
1,154

 
(153
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Pensacola
 
FL
 
559

 
146

 
907

 

 
1,053

 
(174
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Plant City
 
FL
 

 
279

 
1,040

 

 
1,319

 
(210
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Plant City
 
FL
 
1,173

 
712

 
1,113

 

 
1,825

 
(244
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Sebring
 
FL
 

 
492

 
1,063

 

 
1,555

 
(162
)
 
6/24/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
St Petersburg
 
FL
 
1,093

 
690

 
1,000

 

 
1,690

 
(222
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
632

 
871

 

 
1,503

 
(198
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Tampa
 
FL
 
1,005

 
531

 
1,062

 

 
1,593

 
(228
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Family Dollar
 
Tampa
 
FL
 
1,168

 
773

 
1,057

 

 
1,830

 
(231
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
552

 
792

 

 
1,344

 
(169
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Winter Haven
 
FL
 

 
534

 
942

 

 
1,476

 
(90
)
 
8/8/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Zellwood
 
FL
 

 
272

 
1,005

 

 
1,277

 
(141
)
 
8/22/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Abbeville
 
GA
 

 
163

 
768

 

 
931

 
(119
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Acworth
 
GA
 

 
489

 
901

 

 
1,390

 
(133
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Alma
 
GA
 

 
79

 
954

 

 
1,033

 
(137
)
 
8/28/2014
 
1982
Family Dollar
 
Claxton
 
GA
 

 
322

 
665

 

 
987

 
(137
)
 
5/14/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Cordele
 
GA
 

 
136

 
1,049

 

 
1,185

 
(161
)
 
4/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Fayetteville
 
GA
 

 
217

 
1,203

 

 
1,420

 
(158
)
 
11/20/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Helena
 
GA
 

 
242

 
790

 

 
1,032

 
(174
)
 
2/19/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Jeffersonville
 
GA
 

 
153

 
926

 

 
1,079

 
(132
)
 
8/15/2014
 
2014

F-122



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Lenox
 
GA
 

 
90

 
809

 

 
899

 
(230
)
 
11/9/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Lindale
 
GA
 

 
227

 
966

 

 
1,193

 
(142
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Macon
 
GA
 

 
300

 
893

 

 
1,193

 
(130
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Macon
 
GA
 
673

 
230

 
851

 

 
1,081

 
(183
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Marietta
 
GA
 

 
366

 
749

 

 
1,115

 
(165
)
 
2/19/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Marietta
 
GA
 

 
582

 
1,126

 

 
1,708

 
(162
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Omega
 
GA
 

 
167

 
716

 

 
883

 
(154
)
 
3/12/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Richland
 
GA
 

 
125

 
859

 

 
984

 
(125
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Riverdale
 
GA
 

 
310

 
1,188

 

 
1,498

 
(164
)
 
9/26/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Vienna
 
GA
 

 
62

 
721

 

 
783

 
(155
)
 
3/12/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 
822

 
411

 
871

 

 
1,282

 
(191
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Fort Dodge
 
IA
 
408

 
152

 
449

 

 
601

 
(104
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Arco
 
ID
 

 
76

 
684

 

 
760

 
(198
)
 
9/18/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Homedale
 
ID
 
973

 
59

 
1,387

 

 
1,446

 
(299
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Family Dollar
 
Kimberly
 
ID
 

 
219

 
657

 

 
876

 
(174
)
 
4/10/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Mount Vernon
 
IL
 

 
117

 
1,050

 

 
1,167

 
(263
)
 
7/11/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Pulaski
 
IL
 

 
31

 
588

 

 
619

 
(166
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
University Park
 
IL
 

 
295

 
688

 

 
983

 
(163
)
 
10/29/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Brookston
 
IN
 

 
126

 
715

 

 
841

 
(205
)
 
10/1/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 
613

 
375

 
707

 

 
1,082

 
(139
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Lake Village
 
IN
 

 
154

 
752

 

 
906

 
(309
)
 
4/30/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Mitchell
 
IN
 

 
101

 
1,119

 

 
1,220

 
(166
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Princeton
 
IN
 
526

 
300

 
486

 

 
786

 
(109
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
Seymour
 
IN
 

 
238

 
764

 

 
1,002

 
(169
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Terre Haute
 
IN
 
394

 
235

 
427

 

 
662

 
(91
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Greensburg
 
KS
 

 
80

 
718

 

 
798

 
(173
)
 
9/9/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Kansas City
 
KS
 

 
290

 
1,170

 
(5
)
 
1,455

 
(178
)
 
11/6/2014
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Kansas City
 
KS
 

 
352

 
1,026

 

 
1,378

 
(159
)
 
12/18/2014
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Kansas City
 
KS
 
982

 
154

 
1,367

 

 
1,521

 
(287
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Topeka
 
KS
 

 
177

 
1,405

 

 
1,582

 
(304
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Wichita
 
KS
 

 
216

 
1,035

 

 
1,251

 
(148
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Bowling Green
 
KY
 

 
334

 
951

 

 
1,285

 
(137
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013

F-123



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Carlisle
 
KY
 

 
157

 
871

 

 
1,028

 
(128
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Garrison
 
KY
 

 
134

 
737

 

 
871

 
(170
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Rockholds
 
KY
 

 
121

 
988

 

 
1,109

 
(147
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Abbeville
 
LA
 
740

 
141

 
949

 

 
1,090

 
(209
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Alexandria
 
LA
 
458

 
168

 
579

 

 
747

 
(123
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Arcadia
 
LA
 

 
51

 
704

 

 
755

 
(165
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Avondale
 
LA
 

 
381

 
1,255

 

 
1,636

 
(181
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Chalmette
 
LA
 

 
751

 
615

 

 
1,366

 
(183
)
 
5/3/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Farmerville
 
LA
 
722

 
110

 
968

 

 
1,078

 
(209
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Kentwood
 
LA
 
683

 
117

 
877

 

 
994

 
(194
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 
1,146

 
547

 
1,252

 

 
1,799

 
(268
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Shreveport
 
LA
 
892

 
177

 
1,177

 

 
1,354

 
(252
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Tickfaw
 
LA
 

 
181

 
543

 

 
724

 
(165
)
 
3/30/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Westwego
 
LA
 

 
332

 
1,052

 

 
1,384

 
(155
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Lynn
 
MA
 
1,222

 
400

 
1,547

 

 
1,947

 
(324
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Barryton
 
MI
 

 
32

 
599

 

 
631

 
(169
)
 
12/18/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Birch Run
 
MI
 

 
81

 
729

 
86

 
896

 
(189
)
 
7/11/2013
 
1950
Family Dollar
 
Brooklyn
 
MI
 

 
150

 
634

 

 
784

 
(140
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
130

 
1,169

 

 
1,299

 
(332
)
 
11/27/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
106

 
956

 

 
1,062

 
(248
)
 
5/2/2013
 
1964
Family Dollar
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
110

 
1,051

 

 
1,161

 
(159
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
162

 
1,027

 

 
1,189

 
(243
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Hudson
 
MI
 
833

 
108

 
1,020

 

 
1,128

 
(235
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Jackson
 
MI
 

 
93

 
525

 

 
618

 
(127
)
 
9/12/2013
 
2007
Family Dollar
 
Kentwood
 
MI
 
739

 
389

 
919

 

 
1,308

 
(181
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Monroe
 
MI
 

 
243

 
1,061

 

 
1,304

 
(155
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Newaygo
 
MI
 
689

 
317

 
677

 

 
994

 
(156
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Pontiac
 
MI
 
962

 
136

 
1,249

 

 
1,385

 
(276
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Remus
 
MI
 

 
49

 
992

 

 
1,041

 
(231
)
 
1/2/2014
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Saginaw
 
MI
 

 
164

 
1,086

 

 
1,250

 
(242
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Tustin
 
MI
 

 
33

 
633

 

 
666

 
(178
)
 
12/18/2012
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Crosby
 
MN
 

 
49

 
928

 

 
977

 
(232
)
 
7/11/2013
 
1985

F-124



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Ely
 
MN
 

 
231

 
1,008

 

 
1,239

 
(227
)
 
2/27/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Intrnatnl Falls
 
MN
 

 
32

 
608

 

 
640

 
(147
)
 
9/30/2013
 
1966
Family Dollar
 
St. Peter
 
MN
 
409

 
93

 
566

 

 
659

 
(116
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1960
Family Dollar
 
Berkeley
 
MO
 
969

 
179

 
1,391

 

 
1,570

 
(283
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 
683

 
277

 
812

 

 
1,089

 
(171
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 
1,211

 
119

 
1,705

 

 
1,824

 
(364
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 
970

 
142

 
1,338

 

 
1,480

 
(283
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Marble Hill
 
MO
 

 
38

 
719

 

 
757

 
(177
)
 
8/29/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Raytown
 
MO
 

 
415

 

 
1,287

 
1,702

 
(139
)
 
2/20/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
St Louis
 
MO
 

 
168

 
671

 
(4
)
 
835

 
(200
)
 
4/2/2012
 
2006
Family Dollar
 
St Louis
 
MO
 
972

 
215

 
1,357

 

 
1,572

 
(279
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
St Louis
 
MO
 

 
258

 
1,310

 

 
1,568

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
445

 
1,038

 

 
1,483

 
(298
)
 
10/23/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Bassfield
 
MS
 

 
96

 
752

 

 
848

 
(172
)
 
2/19/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Biloxi
 
MS
 

 
310

 
575

 

 
885

 
(174
)
 
3/30/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Canton
 
MS
 

 
210

 
1,142

 

 
1,352

 
(165
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Carriere
 
MS
 

 
200

 
599

 

 
799

 
(182
)
 
3/30/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
D'Iberville
 
MS
 

 
241

 
561

 
1

 
803

 
(168
)
 
5/21/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Drew
 
MS
 

 
11

 
1,039

 

 
1,050

 
(177
)
 
8/28/2014
 
1989
Family Dollar
 
Greenville
 
MS
 

 
125

 
872

 

 
997

 
(189
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Gulfport
 
MS
 

 
209

 
626

 

 
835

 
(187
)
 
5/21/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Gulfport
 
MS
 

 
270

 
629

 

 
899

 
(182
)
 
9/20/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Gulfport
 
MS
 

 
218

 
654

 

 
872

 
(186
)
 
11/15/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Gulfport
 
MS
 

 
312

 
1,237

 

 
1,549

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Family Dollar
 
Hattiesburg
 
MS
 

 
225

 
674

 

 
899

 
(188
)
 
1/30/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Horn Lake
 
MS
 

 
225

 
676

 

 
901

 
(197
)
 
8/22/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Kiln
 
MS
 

 
106

 
650

 

 
756

 
(185
)
 
11/14/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Laurel
 
MS
 

 
225

 
723

 

 
948

 
(166
)
 
2/19/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Natchez
 
MS
 

 
289

 
749

 

 
1,038

 
(142
)
 
8/28/2014
 
1982
Family Dollar
 
Okolona
 
MS
 

 
64

 
578

 

 
642

 
(170
)
 
7/31/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Pearl
 
MS
 

 
342

 
1,001

 

 
1,343

 
(143
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Philadelphia
 
MS
 

 
53

 
897

 

 
950

 
(132
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014

F-125



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Anaconda
 
MT
 

 
164

 
1,058

 

 
1,222

 
(159
)
 
9/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Ennis
 
MT
 

 
246

 

 
773

 
1,019

 
(142
)
 
1/8/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Three Forks
 
MT
 

 
250

 

 
953

 
1,203

 
(88
)
 
8/20/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Whitehall
 
MT
 

 
132

 

 
1,064

 
1,196

 
(194
)
 
3/19/2015
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Asheboro
 
NC
 

 
251

 
932

 

 
1,183

 
(139
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Boiling Springs
 
NC
 

 
322

 
767

 

 
1,089

 
(109
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Burlington
 
NC
 

 
291

 
694

 

 
985

 
(102
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
352

 
985

 

 
1,337

 
(206
)
 
4/15/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
490

 
1,066

 

 
1,556

 
(153
)
 
7/2/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
412

 
992

 

 
1,404

 
(145
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Ellerbe
 
NC
 

 
225

 
781

 

 
1,006

 
(146
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
267

 
682

 

 
949

 
(147
)
 
3/14/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Hickory
 
NC
 

 
215

 
785

 

 
1,000

 
(115
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Hiddenite
 
NC
 

 
221

 
832

 

 
1,053

 
(122
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Liberty
 
NC
 

 
243

 
802

 

 
1,045

 
(117
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Lumberton
 
NC
 

 
151

 
603

 

 
754

 
(145
)
 
9/11/2013
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Lumberton
 
NC
 

 
146

 
1,013

 

 
1,159

 
(152
)
 
6/20/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Parkton
 
NC
 

 
164

 
894

 

 
1,058

 
(127
)
 
9/19/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Raeford
 
NC
 

 
428

 
900

 

 
1,328

 
(189
)
 
4/17/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Raeford
 
NC
 

 
185

 
935

 

 
1,120

 
(174
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014

F-126



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Troy
 
NC
 

 
341

 
621

 

 
962

 
(100
)
 
6/17/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Fort Yates
 
ND
 

 
126

 
715

 

 
841

 
(220
)
 
1/31/2012
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
New Town
 
ND
 

 
105

 
942

 
24

 
1,071

 
(291
)
 
1/31/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Rolla
 
ND
 

 
83

 
749

 

 
832

 
(231
)
 
1/31/2012
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Madison
 
NE
 

 
37

 
703

 

 
740

 
(218
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Omaha
 
NE
 

 
196

 
1,334

 

 
1,530

 
(231
)
 
12/19/2014
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Omaha
 
NE
 

 
141

 
1,159

 
3

 
1,303

 
(190
)
 
12/18/2014
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Rushville
 
NE
 

 
125

 
499

 

 
624

 
(132
)
 
4/26/2013
 
2007
Family Dollar
 
Lancaster
 
NH
 

 
456

 
1,294

 
(2
)
 
1,748

 
(174
)
 
12/12/2014
 
1989
Family Dollar
 
Stratford
 
NJ
 

 
378

 
1,511

 
(174
)
 
1,715

 
(170
)
 
12/31/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Alamorgordo
 
NM
 
524

 
161

 
675

 

 
836

 
(139
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Belen
 
NM
 

 
350

 

 
969

 
1,319

 
(122
)
 
5/29/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Carrizozo
 
NM
 

 
250

 

 
1,113

 
1,363

 
(120
)
 
3/6/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Chimayo
 
NM
 

 
158

 
632

 
(15
)
 
775

 
(174
)
 
1/30/2013
 
2009
Family Dollar
 
Cloudcroft
 
NM
 

 
184

 
1,344

 

 
1,528

 
(212
)
 
12/18/2014
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Clovis
 
NM
 
657

 
119

 
854

 

 
973

 
(184
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Gallup
 
NM
 

 
221

 
1,366

 

 
1,587

 
(307
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Family Dollar
 
Hernandez
 
NM
 
1,152

 
140

 
1,434

 

 
1,574

 
(321
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Family Dollar
 
Logan
 
NM
 

 
80

 

 
1,147

 
1,227

 
(124
)
 
5/29/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Lovington
 
NM
 

 
54

 
722

 

 
776

 
(107
)
 
6/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Mountainair
 
NM
 

 
84

 
752

 

 
836

 
(221
)
 
7/16/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Roswell
 
NM
 
766

 
140

 
953

 

 
1,093

 
(209
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Springer
 
NM
 

 
106

 

 
1,199

 
1,305

 
(167
)
 
2/11/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Velarde
 
NM
 

 
183

 

 
1,122

 
1,305

 
(121
)
 
2/25/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Waterflow
 
NM
 

 
175

 

 
1,294

 
1,469

 
(85
)
 
2/5/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Battle Mountain
 
NV
 

 
116

 
1,431

 

 
1,547

 
(307
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Family Dollar
 
Carlin
 
NV
 

 
99

 
895

 

 
994

 
(216
)
 
9/13/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Cold Springs
 
NV
 

 
217

 
869

 

 
1,086

 
(209
)
 
9/13/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Hawthorne
 
NV
 

 
191

 
764

 

 
955

 
(226
)
 
6/1/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 
876

 
689

 
612

 

 
1,301

 
(153
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Lovelock
 
NV
 

 
185

 
742

 

 
927

 
(221
)
 
5/4/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Silver Spring
 
NV
 

 
202

 
808

 

 
1,010

 
(234
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2012

F-127



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Wells
 
NV
 

 
84

 
755

 

 
839

 
(225
)
 
5/11/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Altona
 
NY
 

 
94

 
923

 

 
1,017

 
(211
)
 
2/21/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Chateaugay
 
NY
 

 
133

 
910

 

 
1,043

 
(207
)
 
2/20/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Cincinnatus
 
NY
 

 
287

 
862

 

 
1,149

 
(196
)
 
12/30/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Penn Yan
 
NY
 
525

 
23

 
760

 

 
783

 
(161
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Sodus
 
NY
 

 
54

 
1,441

 

 
1,495

 
(296
)
 
5/7/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Wolcott
 
NY
 

 
197

 
1,193

 

 
1,390

 
(155
)
 
3/25/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Bethel
 
OH
 
852

 
139

 
1,099

 

 
1,238

 
(243
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Canal Winchester
 
OH
 

 
218

 
1,116

 

 
1,334

 
(160
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Canton
 
OH
 
460

 
93

 
766

 

 
859

 
(157
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
221

 
1,055

 

 
1,276

 
(163
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 
1,079

 
39

 
1,614

 

 
1,653

 
(338
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 
1,370

 
216

 
1,818

 

 
2,034

 
(392
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Family Dollar
 
Cortland
 
OH
 

 
188

 
963

 

 
1,151

 
(142
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
107

 
899

 

 
1,006

 
(164
)
 
8/28/2014
 
1940
Family Dollar
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
129

 
618

 

 
747

 
(105
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Hamilton
 
OH
 

 
131

 
1,215

 

 
1,346

 
(171
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Jackson Center
 
OH
 

 
97

 
764

 

 
861

 
(115
)
 
4/28/2014
 
1989
Family Dollar
 
Loveland
 
OH
 
798

 
179

 
986

 

 
1,165

 
(217
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Middleton
 
OH
 
660

 
137

 
869

 

 
1,006

 
(187
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Toledo
 
OH
 

 
306

 
917

 

 
1,223

 
(251
)
 
2/25/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Toledo
 
OH
 

 
226

 
905

 

 
1,131

 
(227
)
 
7/11/2013
 
1942
Family Dollar
 
Warren
 
OH
 

 
170

 
681

 
(2
)
 
849

 
(197
)
 
9/11/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Durant
 
OK
 

 
164

 
1,223

 

 
1,387

 
(184
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
El Reno
 
OK
 

 
225

 

 
968

 
1,193

 
(155
)
 
3/2/2015
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Geary
 
OK
 

 
167

 
882

 

 
1,049

 
(91
)
 
10/14/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Keota
 
OK
 

 
279

 
872

 

 
1,151

 
(133
)
 
10/16/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Kingston
 
OK
 

 
28

 
660

 

 
688

 
(131
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
403

 

 
988

 
1,391

 
(106
)
 
5/15/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
390

 
990

 

 
1,380

 
(144
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Porum
 
OK
 

 
18

 

 
995

 
1,013

 
(109
)
 
11/5/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Poteau
 
OK
 

 
310

 

 
924

 
1,234

 
(105
)
 
8/7/2015
 
2015

F-128



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Stilwell
 
OK
 

 
40

 
768

 

 
808

 
(236
)
 
1/6/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Texhoma
 
OK
 

 
150

 

 
912

 
1,062

 
(79
)
 
4/15/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
220

 
878

 

 
1,098

 
(258
)
 
7/30/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Broad Top
 
PA
 

 
196

 
954

 

 
1,150

 
(142
)
 
5/30/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Abbeville
 
SC
 

 
146

 
734

 

 
880

 
(116
)
 
5/23/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
429

 
719

 

 
1,148

 
(155
)
 
3/12/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
489

 
943

 

 
1,432

 
(114
)
 
2/3/2015
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Estill
 
SC
 

 
244

 
757

 

 
1,001

 
(117
)
 
6/4/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Lancaster
 
SC
 

 
249

 
725

 

 
974

 
(108
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Manning
 
SC
 

 
313

 
960

 

 
1,273

 
(137
)
 
9/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Mccormick
 
SC
 

 
167

 
791

 

 
958

 
(167
)
 
4/30/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Newberry
 
SC
 

 
231

 
935

 

 
1,166

 
(199
)
 
3/27/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
North
 
SC
 

 
193

 
979

 

 
1,172

 
(120
)
 
2/23/2015
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
St. Matthews
 
SC
 

 
175

 
828

 

 
1,003

 
(119
)
 
9/3/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Woodruff
 
SC
 

 
229

 
1,125

 

 
1,354

 
(160
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Blackhawk
 
SD
 

 
115

 
585

 

 
700

 
(90
)
 
8/6/2014
 
2006
Family Dollar
 
Custer
 
SD
 

 
32

 
617

 

 
649

 
(157
)
 
6/14/2013
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Lemmon
 
SD
 

 
140

 

 
1,021

 
1,161

 
(104
)
 
5/1/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Martin
 
SD
 

 
85

 
764

 

 
849

 
(235
)
 
1/31/2012
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Mclaughlin
 
SD
 

 
35

 

 
1,092

 
1,127

 
(93
)
 
5/12/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Parker
 
SD
 

 
117

 
828

 
1

 
946

 
(143
)
 
10/10/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Tyndall
 
SD
 

 
72

 

 
1,072

 
1,144

 
(125
)
 
3/31/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Harrison
 
TN
 

 
74

 
420

 

 
494

 
(105
)
 
7/23/2013
 
2006
Family Dollar
 
Lexington
 
TN
 

 
323

 
838

 

 
1,161

 
(123
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
248

 
1,039

 

 
1,287

 
(220
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Memphis
 
TN
 
638

 
215

 
811

 

 
1,026

 
(171
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Memphis
 
TN
 
1,251

 
376

 
1,508

 

 
1,884

 
(327
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Memphis
 
TN
 
973

 
336

 
1,156

 

 
1,492

 
(248
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
334

 
1,275

 

 
1,609

 
(200
)
 
8/28/2014
 
1976
Family Dollar
 
Piney Flats
 
TN
 

 
200

 
953

 

 
1,153

 
(139
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Alton
 
TX
 

 
134

 
908

 

 
1,042

 
(131
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
300

 

 
1,058

 
1,358

 
(101
)
 
12/4/2015
 
1995

F-129



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
425

 

 
1,112

 
1,537

 
(46
)
 
2/13/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Avinger
 
TX
 

 
40

 
761

 

 
801

 
(218
)
 
10/22/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Balch Springs
 
TX
 

 
318

 

 
1,209

 
1,527

 
(110
)
 
4/10/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Beaumont
 
TX
 

 
215

 
1,511

 

 
1,726

 
(290
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Beaumont
 
TX
 

 
235

 
810

 

 
1,045

 
(170
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Beaumont
 
TX
 
654

 
225

 
806

 

 
1,031

 
(168
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Blooming Grove
 
TX
 

 
70

 
753

 

 
823

 
(111
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Brazoria
 
TX
 

 
216

 
966

 

 
1,182

 
(201
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Broaddus
 
TX
 

 
75

 

 
922

 
997

 
(139
)
 
2/6/2015
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Caldwell
 
TX
 

 
138

 
552

 
22

 
712

 
(165
)
 
5/29/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Centerville
 
TX
 

 
226

 
679

 

 
905

 
(164
)
 
9/10/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Chireno
 
TX
 

 
50

 
943

 

 
993

 
(266
)
 
12/10/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Clarendon
 
TX
 

 
83

 
749

 

 
832

 
(181
)
 
9/17/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Cockrell Hill
 
TX
 
970

 
369

 
1,156

 

 
1,525

 
(245
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Converse
 
TX
 
409

 
148

 
469

 

 
617

 
(101
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Dallas
 
TX
 
627

 
292

 
676

 

 
968

 
(149
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Dickinson
 
TX
 
681

 
182

 
876

 

 
1,058

 
(185
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Donna
 
TX
 

 
194

 
855

 

 
1,049

 
(127
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Eagle Lake
 
TX
 

 
100

 
566

 
100

 
766

 
(170
)
 
7/6/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Etoile
 
TX
 

 
45

 
850

 

 
895

 
(209
)
 
8/6/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Floydada
 
TX
 

 
36

 
681

 

 
717

 
(211
)
 
12/30/2011
 
2010
Family Dollar
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
276

 
935

 

 
1,211

 
(97
)
 
8/21/2015
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
350

 

 
1,015

 
1,365

 
(81
)
 
11/3/2014
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
174

 
696

 

 
870

 
(184
)
 
4/26/2013
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 
886

 
297

 
1,081

 

 
1,378

 
(226
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
565

 
1,223

 

 
1,788

 
(260
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
138

 
1,052

 

 
1,190

 
(218
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
128

 
769

 

 
897

 
(148
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 
911

 
277

 
1,144

 

 
1,421

 
(238
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Houston
 
TX
 
920

 
1,355

 
95

 

 
1,450

 
(35
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1981
Family Dollar
 
Industry
 
TX
 

 
190

 

 
902

 
1,092

 
(110
)
 
1/5/2015
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Jacksonville
 
TX
 

 
195

 
1,003

 

 
1,198

 
(221
)
 
3/21/2014
 
2014

F-130



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
Kerens
 
TX
 

 
73

 
658

 

 
731

 
(201
)
 
2/29/2012
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
La Pryor
 
TX
 

 
74

 
817

 

 
891

 
(119
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Leander
 
TX
 
557

 
355

 
489

 

 
844

 
(108
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Lovelady
 
TX
 

 
82

 
740

 

 
822

 
(199
)
 
3/27/2013
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Lufkin
 
TX
 
1,153

 
198

 
1,600

 

 
1,798

 
(331
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Marshall
 
TX
 

 
85

 
662

 

 
747

 
(144
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 

 
445

 
896

 

 
1,341

 
(130
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 
857

 
219

 
1,093

 

 
1,312

 
(230
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Mesquite
 
TX
 

 
426

 

 
1,146

 
1,572

 
(129
)
 
5/29/2015
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Mesquite
 
TX
 

 
1,414

 

 
(8
)
 
1,406

 
(117
)
 
9/1/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Mesquite
 
TX
 

 
1,460

 

 
(184
)
 
1,276

 
(121
)
 
7/9/2015
 
2015
Family Dollar
 
Mexia
 
TX
 

 
112

 
495

 

 
607

 
(109
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
Noonday
 
TX
 
625

 
103

 
895

 

 
998

 
(188
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Oakhurst
 
TX
 

 
36

 
683

 

 
719

 
(193
)
 
12/12/2012
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Oakwood
 
TX
 

 
133

 
752

 

 
885

 
(174
)
 
11/20/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Ore City
 
TX
 

 
27

 
744

 

 
771

 
(109
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Palestine
 
TX
 
671

 
120

 
914

 

 
1,034

 
(195
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Family Dollar
 
Pharr
 
TX
 
969

 
219

 
1,253

 

 
1,472

 
(264
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Plano
 
TX
 

 
468

 
869

 

 
1,337

 
(214
)
 
8/1/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Port Arthur
 
TX
 
1,044

 
178

 
1,452

 

 
1,630

 
(299
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Family Dollar
 
Raymondville
 
TX
 
542

 
117

 
707

 

 
824

 
(149
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Refugio
 
TX
 

 
110

 
982

 

 
1,092

 
(141
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Rio Grande
 
TX
 

 
133

 
1,284

 

 
1,417

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Robstown
 
TX
 
550

 
44

 
852

 

 
896

 
(172
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Royse City
 
TX
 
972

 
411

 
1,078

 

 
1,489

 
(229
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
Sabinal
 
TX
 

 
35

 
952

 

 
987

 
(136
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 
891

 
232

 
1,118

 

 
1,350

 
(238
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
800

 
198

 
1,018

 

 
1,216

 
(215
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Family Dollar
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
864

 
299

 
1,039

 

 
1,338

 
(218
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
598

 
260

 
653

 

 
913

 
(140
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
506

 
211

 
567

 

 
778

 
(121
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004

F-131



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Family Dollar
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
728

 
214

 
911

 

 
1,125

 
(191
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
1,143

 
117

 
1,619

 

 
1,736

 
(338
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
San Benito
 
TX
 
598

 
132

 
772

 

 
904

 
(164
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
San Diego
 
TX
 
602

 
55

 
855

 

 
910

 
(180
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Family Dollar
 
Seadrift
 
TX
 

 
51

 
832

 

 
883

 
(121
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Somerville
 
TX
 

 
131

 
743

 

 
874

 
(209
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1995
Family Dollar
 
Sonora
 
TX
 

 
49

 
548

 

 
597

 
(96
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Tyler
 
TX
 
416

 
132

 
554

 

 
686

 
(116
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Victoria
 
TX
 

 
441

 
144

 

 
585

 
(38
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Waco
 
TX
 
440

 
125

 
544

 

 
669

 
(116
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Family Dollar
 
Weatherford
 
TX
 

 
218

 
1,057

 
(5
)
 
1,270

 
(174
)
 
10/10/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Beaver
 
UT
 
646

 
107

 
913

 

 
1,020

 
(194
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Family Dollar
 
Bristol
 
VA
 
608

 
104

 
837

 

 
941

 
(186
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1978
Family Dollar
 
Gretna
 
VA
 

 
131

 
744

 

 
875

 
(186
)
 
7/2/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Hopewell
 
VA
 

 
430

 
987

 

 
1,417

 
(222
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Petersburg
 
VA
 
948

 
142

 
1,209

 

 
1,351

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Stuart
 
VA
 

 
204

 
750

 

 
954

 
(82
)
 
4/18/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Wirtz
 
VA
 

 
148

 
919

 

 
1,067

 
(134
)
 
8/28/2014
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Green Bay
 
WI
 

 
304

 
1,072

 

 
1,376

 
(230
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Family Dollar
 
Markesan
 
WI
 

 
92

 
831

 

 
923

 
(189
)
 
12/12/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Mayville
 
WI
 

 
128

 
1,023

 

 
1,151

 
(228
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2014
Family Dollar
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 
970

 
161

 
1,397

 

 
1,558

 
(288
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Family Dollar
 
Thorp
 
WI
 

 
90

 
810

 

 
900

 
(199
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Webster
 
WI
 

 
43

 
808

 

 
851

 
(202
)
 
7/11/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Alderson
 
WV
 

 
166

 
663

 

 
829

 
(166
)
 
7/11/2013
 
2012
Family Dollar
 
Kemmerer
 
WY
 

 
45

 
853

 

 
898

 
(234
)
 
2/22/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Mountain View
 
WY
 

 
44

 
838

 

 
882

 
(202
)
 
9/13/2013
 
2013
Family Dollar
 
Torrington
 
WY
 

 
72

 
645

 

 
717

 
(167
)
 
5/9/2013
 
1995
Family Fare Supermarket
 
Battle Creek
 
MI
 

 
1,393

 
7,950

 

 
9,343

 
(1,716
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Farmers Insurance
 
Mercer Island
 
WA
 

 
24,285

 
28,210

 

 
52,495

 
(5,714
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1982
Fazoli's
 
Carmel
 
IN
 

 
427

 
522

 

 
949

 
(123
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
FedEx
 
Homewood
 
AL
 

 
522

 
779

 

 
1,301

 
(199
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000

F-132



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
FedEx
 
Tempe
 
AZ
 

 
2,914

 
12,300

 
133

 
15,347

 
(2,202
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2004
FedEx
 
Yuma
 
AZ
 

 

 
2,076

 

 
2,076

 
(658
)
 
10/17/2012
 
2011
FedEx
 
Chico
 
CA
 

 
308

 
2,776

 
123

 
3,207

 
(861
)
 
11/9/2012
 
2006
FedEx
 
Commerce City
 
CO
 

 
6,556

 
26,224

 
393

 
33,173

 
(8,779
)
 
3/20/2012
 
2007
FedEx
 
Melbourne
 
FL
 

 
159

 
1,433

 

 
1,592

 
(390
)
 
7/26/2013
 
2001
FedEx
 
Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
733

 
1,361

 
183

 
2,277

 
(403
)
 
4/18/2013
 
1986
FedEx
 
Ottumwa
 
IA
 

 
205

 
2,552

 
2,749

 
5,506

 
(1,019
)
 
10/30/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Waterloo
 
IA
 

 
152

 
2,882

 

 
3,034

 
(842
)
 
3/22/2013
 
2006
FedEx
 
Effingham
 
IL
 
6,811

 
1,875

 
14,827

 

 
16,702

 
(2,715
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
FedEx
 
Kankakee
 
IL
 

 
195

 
1,103

 
176

 
1,474

 
(377
)
 
5/31/2012
 
2003
FedEx
 
Quincy
 
IL
 

 
371

 
2,101

 
3,011

 
5,483

 
(934
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Evansville
 
IN
 

 
665

 
2,661

 

 
3,326

 
(873
)
 
5/31/2012
 
1998
FedEx
 
Kokomo
 
IN
 

 
186

 
3,541

 
3,442

 
7,169

 
(1,367
)
 
3/16/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Lafayette
 
IN
 
2,157

 
768

 
4,128

 

 
4,896

 
(734
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
FedEx
 
Independence
 
KS
 

 
114

 
2,166

 

 
2,280

 
(677
)
 
10/30/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Hazard
 
KY
 

 
215

 
4,085

 

 
4,300

 
(1,290
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
London
 
KY
 

 
350

 
3,151

 

 
3,501

 
(809
)
 
10/11/2013
 
2013
FedEx
 
Bossier City
 
LA
 

 
295

 
6,223

 

 
6,518

 
(1,198
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
FedEx
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
1,797

 
7,189

 

 
8,986

 
(2,337
)
 
6/14/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Port Huron
 
MI
 

 
125

 
1,121

 

 
1,246

 
(316
)
 
5/31/2013
 
2003
FedEx
 
Roseville
 
MN
 

 
1,462

 
8,282

 

 
9,744

 
(2,564
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Mccomb
 
MS
 

 
548

 
3,268

 
2,212

 
6,028

 
(736
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
FedEx
 
Butte
 
MT
 

 
403

 
7,653

 
2,763

 
10,819

 
(2,899
)
 
9/27/2011
 
2001
FedEx
 
Greenville
 
NC
 

 
363

 
6,903

 

 
7,266

 
(2,329
)
 
2/22/2012
 
2006
FedEx
 
Belmont
 
NH
 

 
265

 
2,386

 

 
2,651

 
(820
)
 
12/29/2011
 
1991
FedEx
 
Wendover
 
NV
 

 
262

 
1,483

 

 
1,745

 
(441
)
 
2/25/2013
 
2012
FedEx
 
Blauvelt
 
NY
 
26,100

 
14,420

 
26,779

 

 
41,199

 
(8,870
)
 
4/5/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Marcy
 
NY
 

 
339

 
5,795

 

 
6,134

 
(1,496
)
 
9/5/2014
 
2006
FedEx
 
Plattsburg
 
NY
 
2,614

 
801

 
3,982

 

 
4,783

 
(830
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
FedEx
 
Lebanon
 
OH
 

 
1,492

 
8,452

 

 
9,944

 
(2,381
)
 
8/26/2013
 
2013
FedEx
 
Northwood
 
OH
 
2,410

 
674

 
5,497

 
486

 
6,657

 
(995
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
FedEx
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
458

 
8,695

 

 
9,153

 
(2,934
)
 
2/22/2012
 
2008

F-133



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
FedEx
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
1,476

 
18,054

 
555

 
20,085

 
(4,470
)
 
3/31/2014
 
1999
FedEx
 
Tinicum
 
PA
 

 

 
32,180

 
549

 
32,729

 
(8,669
)
 
8/15/2013
 
2013
FedEx
 
Rapid City
 
SD
 

 
305

 
2,741

 
4,584

 
7,630

 
(1,162
)
 
5/8/2015
 
2007
FedEx
 
Blountville
 
TN
 

 
562

 
5,056

 

 
5,618

 
(1,706
)
 
2/3/2012
 
2009
FedEx
 
Humboldt
 
TN
 

 
239

 
4,543

 

 
4,782

 
(1,463
)
 
7/11/2012
 
2008
FedEx
 
Bryan
 
TX
 

 
1,422

 
4,763

 
41

 
6,226

 
(1,203
)
 
6/15/2012
 
1995
FedEx
 
Omak
 
WA
 

 
252

 
1,425

 

 
1,677

 
(450
)
 
9/27/2012
 
2012
FedEx
 
Wenatchee
 
WA
 

 
266

 
2,393

 

 
2,659

 
(756
)
 
9/27/2012
 
1995
FedEx
 
Menomonee Falls
 
WI
 

 
4,215

 
14,555

 

 
18,770

 
(1,315
)
 
2/18/2016
 
2015
FedEx
 
Parkersburg
 
WV
 

 
193

 
3,671

 

 
3,864

 
(1,159
)
 
9/20/2012
 
2012
Fire Mountain Buffet
 
Summerville
 
SC
 

 
245

 
1,308

 
(1,241
)
 
312

 
(47
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1997
Fire Mountain Buffet
 
Charleston
 
WV
 

 
243

 
1,305

 
(1,228
)
 
320

 
(58
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2000
First Bank
 
Pinellas Park
 
FL
 

 
630

 
1,470

 
4

 
2,104

 
(332
)
 
10/1/2013
 
1980
Fleming's Steakhouse
 
Englewood
 
CO
 

 
1,152

 
3,055

 

 
4,207

 
(719
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Flint Energy Technologies
 
Rhome
 
TX
 

 
284

 
1,752

 

 
2,036

 
(283
)
 
9/19/2014
 
2014
Floor & Decor
 
Mcdonough
 
GA
 

 
1,859

 
7,711

 

 
9,570

 
(248
)
 
12/13/2016
 
2015
Folsom Gateway II
 
Folsom
 
CA
 
21,600

 
10,314

 
27,983

 
141

 
38,438

 
(5,477
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Food Lion
 
Moyock
 
NC
 

 
1,269

 
2,950

 

 
4,219

 
(690
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Forum Energy Technology
 
Guthrie
 
OK
 

 
393

 
1,305

 

 
1,698

 
(219
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1979
Forum Energy Technology
 
Gainesville
 
TX
 

 
123

 
6,019

 

 
6,142

 
(973
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2008
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Fairhope
 
AL
 

 

 
2,035

 

 
2,035

 
(426
)
 
7/8/2013
 
2006
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Foley
 
AL
 

 
287

 
2,580

 

 
2,867

 
(541
)
 
7/8/2013
 
2009
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
278

 
2,505

 

 
2,783

 
(525
)
 
7/8/2013
 
2009
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Defuniak Springs
 
FL
 

 
115

 
2,180

 

 
2,295

 
(457
)
 
7/8/2013
 
2008
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Aurora
 
IL
 
2,294

 
287

 
2,584

 
15

 
2,886

 
(642
)
 
7/13/2012
 
1996
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
588

 
1,764

 

 
2,352

 
(438
)
 
7/31/2012
 
1960
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Waukegan
 
IL
 

 
94

 
1,792

 
61

 
1,947

 
(453
)
 
7/31/2012
 
1980
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Peru
 
IN
 

 
69

 
1,305

 

 
1,374

 
(327
)
 
6/27/2012
 
1982
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Bossier City
 
LA
 

 
120

 
682

 

 
802

 
(159
)
 
1/30/2013
 
2008
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Caro
 
MI
 

 
92

 
1,744

 

 
1,836

 
(437
)
 
6/5/2012
 
1995
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Jackson
 
MI
 
1,948

 
137

 
2,603

 

 
2,740

 
(653
)
 
6/5/2012
 
1995
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Albemarle
 
NC
 

 
139

 
1,253

 

 
1,392

 
(277
)
 
4/30/2013
 
2008

F-134



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Angiers
 
NC
 

 
203

 
1,152

 

 
1,355

 
(255
)
 
4/30/2013
 
2012
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Asheboro
 
NC
 
2,373

 
323

 
2,903

 

 
3,226

 
(642
)
 
4/30/2013
 
2012
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Clinton
 
NC
 

 
139

 
2,655

 
3

 
2,797

 
(566
)
 
6/28/2013
 
1995
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Fairmont
 
NC
 

 
201

 
1,819

 
6

 
2,026

 
(387
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2002
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
420

 
2,379

 

 
2,799

 
(508
)
 
6/28/2013
 
1995
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
134

 
2,551

 

 
2,685

 
(545
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2004
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
178

 
3,379

 

 
3,557

 
(721
)
 
6/28/2013
 
1999
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Lumberton
 
NC
 

 
117

 
2,216

 

 
2,333

 
(473
)
 
6/28/2013
 
1986
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Pembroke
 
NC
 

 
81

 
1,547

 

 
1,628

 
(330
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2009
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Red Springs
 
NC
 

 
101

 
1,913

 

 
2,014

 
(408
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2000
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Roseboro
 
NC
 

 
74

 
1,404

 

 
1,478

 
(300
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2010
Fresenius Medical Care
 
St. Pauls
 
NC
 

 
73

 
1,389

 

 
1,462

 
(296
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2008
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Taylorsville
 
NC
 

 
275

 
1,099

 

 
1,374

 
(243
)
 
4/30/2013
 
2011
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Warsaw
 
NC
 

 
75

 
1,428

 

 
1,503

 
(341
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2003
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Kings Mills
 
OH
 

 
399

 
598

 
6

 
1,003

 
(151
)
 
6/5/2012
 
1995
Fresenius Medical Care
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
377

 
1,132

 
(42
)
 
1,467

 
(246
)
 
2/28/2013
 
1958
The Fresh Market
 
Winston-Salem
 
NC
 

 
196

 
4,562

 

 
4,758

 
(843
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market
 
Canton
 
MI
 

 
1,361

 
6,976

 

 
8,337

 
(134
)
 
5/18/2017
 
2017
Front Range Community College
 
Longmont
 
CO
 

 
407

 
2,428

 
55

 
2,890

 
(601
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1987
Front Range Community College
 
Longmont
 
CO
 

 
1,150

 
9,067

 
609

 
10,826

 
(2,262
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1988
Furr's
 
Garland
 
TX
 

 
1,529

 
3,715

 

 
5,244

 
(967
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2008
Gainsville Fuel
 
Cleburne
 
TX
 

 
70

 

 

 
70

 

 
6/25/2014
 
2009
Gastro Pub
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 
27,604

 
1,253

 
70,274

 
1,869

 
73,396

 
(14,021
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
GE Aviation
 
Auburn
 
AL
 
24,133

 
1,627

 
30,920

 

 
32,547

 
(8,259
)
 
11/21/2012
 
1995
GE Engine
 
Winfield
 
KS
 

 
1,078

 
5,087

 

 
6,165

 
(3,207
)
 
5/6/2014
 
1951
General Electric
 
Longmont
 
CO
 

 
1,402

 
15,640

 
855

 
17,897

 
(4,002
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1993
General Mills
 
Geneva
 
IL
 

 
7,457

 
22,371

 

 
29,828

 
(7,340
)
 
5/23/2012
 
1998
General Mills
 
Fort Wayne
 
IN
 

 
2,533

 
48,130

 

 
50,663

 
(15,051
)
 
10/18/2012
 
2012
General Service Administration
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
268

 
5,095

 
49

 
5,412

 
(1,501
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1995
General Service Administration
 
Craig
 
CO
 

 
129

 
1,159

 
16

 
1,304

 
(362
)
 
12/30/2011
 
1995
General Service Administration
 
Cocoa
 
FL
 
500

 
253

 
1,435

 
15

 
1,703

 
(450
)
 
12/13/2011
 
1995

F-135



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
General Service Administration
 
Grangeville
 
ID
 
2,100

 
317

 
6,023

 
27

 
6,367

 
(1,824
)
 
3/5/2012
 
2007
General Service Administration
 
Freeport
 
NY
 

 
843

 
3,372

 

 
4,215

 
(1,040
)
 
1/10/2012
 
1995
General Service Administration
 
Plattsburgh
 
NY
 

 
508

 
4,572

 

 
5,080

 
(1,344
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2008
General Service Administration
 
Warren
 
PA
 

 
341

 
3,114

 

 
3,455

 
(919
)
 
6/19/2012
 
2008
General Service Administration
 
Ponce
 
PR
 

 
1,780

 
9,313

 
(4,560
)
 
6,533

 
(444
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
General Service Administration
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
477

 
4,294

 
(4
)
 
4,767

 
(1,274
)
 
5/9/2012
 
2010
General Service Administration
 
Gloucester
 
VA
 

 
287

 
1,628

 

 
1,915

 
(479
)
 
6/20/2012
 
1995
Giant Eagle
 
Gahanna
 
OH
 

 
3,549

 
16,736

 

 
20,285

 
(3,059
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Giant Eagle
 
Lancaster
 
OH
 

 
2,210

 
15,649

 

 
17,859

 
(2,780
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Glen's Market
 
Manistee
 
MI
 

 
294

 
6,694

 

 
6,988

 
(1,359
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Globe Energy Services
 
Hobbs
 
NM
 

 
358

 
1,129

 

 
1,487

 
(214
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2013
Globe Energy Services
 
Big Springs
 
TX
 

 
426

 
599

 

 
1,025

 
(117
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2012
Globe Energy Services
 
Levelland
 
TX
 

 
42

 
1,887

 

 
1,929

 
(353
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1997
Globe Energy Services
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
1,063

 
528

 

 
1,591

 
(103
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2009
Globe Energy Services
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
1,013

 
968

 

 
1,981

 
(167
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2010
Globe Energy Services
 
Monahans
 
TX
 

 
50

 
538

 

 
588

 
(102
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2011
Globe Energy Services
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
104

 
1,259

 

 
1,363

 
(194
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1963
Globe Energy Services
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
500

 
3,891

 

 
4,391

 
(741
)
 
6/12/2014
 
1963
Globe Energy Services
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
821

 
1,658

 

 
2,479

 
(284
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2012
Globe Energy Services
 
Snyder
 
TX
 

 
466

 
588

 

 
1,054

 
(119
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2005
Globe Energy Services
 
Snyder
 
TX
 

 
174

 
1,189

 

 
1,363

 
(189
)
 
6/12/2014
 
1975
GM Financial
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
7,901

 
35,553

 

 
43,454

 
(8,007
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1998
Golden Corral
 
Cullman
 
AL
 

 
847

 
2,390

 
(2,143
)
 
1,094

 
(96
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Golden Corral
 
Gilbert
 
AZ
 

 
871

 
2,910

 

 
3,781

 
(758
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2006
Golden Corral
 
Goodyear
 
AZ
 

 
686

 
1,939

 

 
2,625

 
(505
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2006
Golden Corral
 
Surprise
 
AZ
 

 
1,258

 
4,068

 

 
5,326

 
(1,059
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2007
Golden Corral
 
Bakersfield
 
CA
 

 
2,664

 
2,078

 

 
4,742

 
(533
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Golden Corral
 
Palatka
 
FL
 

 
853

 
1,048

 
(471
)
 
1,430

 
(120
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Golden Corral
 
Albany
 
GA
 

 
460

 
1,863

 

 
2,323

 
(476
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Brunswick
 
GA
 

 
390

 
2,093

 

 
2,483

 
(535
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Council Bluffs
 
IA
 

 
1,140

 
1,460

 

 
2,600

 
(373
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Clarksville
 
IN
 

 
1,061

 
1,344

 

 
2,405

 
(399
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002

F-136



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Golden Corral
 
Evansville
 
IN
 

 
670

 
2,707

 

 
3,377

 
(692
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Kokomo
 
IN
 

 
780

 
2,107

 

 
2,887

 
(539
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Richmond
 
IN
 

 
728

 
723

 

 
1,451

 
(185
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Golden Corral
 
Wichita
 
KS
 

 
560

 
1,306

 

 
1,866

 
(307
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Golden Corral
 
Henderson
 
KY
 

 
600

 
1,586

 

 
2,186

 
(405
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
1,020

 
1,173

 

 
2,193

 
(276
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Golden Corral
 
Owensboro
 
KY
 

 
1,244

 
1,656

 
(1,941
)
 
959

 
(71
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Golden Corral
 
Coon Rapids
 
MN
 

 
1,611

 
2,188

 
(2,893
)
 
906

 
(60
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Golden Corral
 
Independence
 
MO
 

 
1,425

 
2,437

 

 
3,862

 
(574
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Golden Corral
 
Flowood
 
MS
 

 
680

 
2,730

 

 
3,410

 
(698
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Horn Lake
 
MS
 

 
925

 
2,463

 
(2,319
)
 
1,069

 
(93
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Aberdeen
 
NC
 

 
690

 
1,566

 

 
2,256

 
(400
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Burlington
 
NC
 

 
840

 
2,319

 

 
3,159

 
(593
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Hickory
 
NC
 

 
260

 
2,658

 

 
2,918

 
(679
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Bellevue
 
NE
 

 
520

 
1,433

 

 
1,953

 
(366
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Lincoln
 
NE
 

 
300

 
2,930

 

 
3,230

 
(749
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Farmington
 
NM
 

 
270

 
3,174

 
(2,023
)
 
1,421

 
(106
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
640

 
2,133

 

 
2,773

 
(438
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Golden Corral
 
Beavercreek
 
OH
 

 
713

 
1,858

 

 
2,571

 
(367
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Golden Corral
 
Canton
 
OH
 

 
647

 
2,135

 

 
2,782

 
(465
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Golden Corral
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
694

 
2,066

 

 
2,760

 
(444
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Golden Corral
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
1,109

 
2,315

 

 
3,424

 
(462
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Golden Corral
 
Columbus
 
OH
 

 
770

 
2,476

 

 
3,246

 
(633
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
579

 
1,429

 

 
2,008

 
(308
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Golden Corral
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
774

 
2,766

 

 
3,540

 
(583
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002

F-137



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Golden Corral
 
Elyria
 
OH
 

 
1,167

 
1,599

 

 
2,766

 
(325
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Golden Corral
 
Fairfield
 
OH
 

 
859

 
1,135

 

 
1,994

 
(240
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Golden Corral
 
Grove City
 
OH
 

 
926

 
1,859

 

 
2,785

 
(380
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Golden Corral
 
Northfield
 
OH
 

 
947

 
1,061

 

 
2,008

 
(210
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Golden Corral
 
Ontario
 
OH
 

 
616

 
2,412

 

 
3,028

 
(518
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Golden Corral
 
Springfield
 
OH
 

 
619

 
1,142

 

 
1,761

 
(227
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Golden Corral
 
Toledo
 
OH
 

 
838

 
3,333

 

 
4,171

 
(664
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Golden Corral
 
Zanesville
 
OH
 

 
487

 
2,030

 

 
2,517

 
(529
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2002
Golden Corral
 
Midwest City
 
OK
 

 
1,175

 
1,708

 
(983
)
 
1,900

 
(172
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1991
Golden Corral
 
Norman
 
OK
 

 
345

 
2,107

 

 
2,452

 
(549
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Golden Corral
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
280

 
3,890

 

 
4,170

 
(994
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Monroeville
 
PA
 

 
1,647

 
849

 

 
2,496

 
(130
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1982
Golden Corral
 
Rock Hill
 
SC
 

 
320

 
2,130

 

 
2,450

 
(544
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Cookeville
 
TN
 

 
800

 
1,937

 

 
2,737

 
(495
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Baytown
 
TX
 

 
596

 
1,788

 

 
2,384

 
(421
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Golden Corral
 
College Station
 
TX
 

 
1,265

 
1,718

 

 
2,983

 
(447
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1990
Golden Corral
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
1,147

 
2,447

 
(64
)
 
3,530

 
(637
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
644

 
1,702

 

 
2,346

 
(379
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Golden Corral
 
Spring
 
TX
 

 
3,342

 
1,207

 

 
4,549

 
(331
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Golden Corral
 
Texarkana
 
TX
 

 
758

 
3,031

 

 
3,789

 
(713
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Golden Corral
 
Bristol
 
VA
 

 
750

 
2,276

 

 
3,026

 
(582
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Golden Corral
 
Beckley
 
WV
 

 
1,248

 
2,258

 
(2,507
)
 
999

 
(82
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Goodyear
 
Cumming
 
GA
 

 
534

 
2,516

 

 
3,050

 
(490
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Goodyear
 
Cumming
 
GA
 

 
1,085

 
1,915

 

 
3,000

 
(396
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Goodyear
 
Mcdonough
 
GA
 
11,033

 
1,797

 
21,264

 

 
23,061

 
(5,199
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1995
Goodyear
 
Stockbridge
 
GA
 
13,432

 
1,222

 
32,119

 

 
33,341

 
(8,117
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1995
Goodyear
 
Dekalb
 
IL
 
20,147

 
4,476

 
44,516

 

 
48,992

 
(11,245
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1999
Goodyear
 
Lockbourne
 
OH
 
13,144

 
3,107

 
28,868

 

 
31,975

 
(6,984
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Goodyear
 
York
 
PA
 
22,834

 
1,980

 
53,396

 

 
55,376

 
(12,766
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2001
Goodyear
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
656

 
2,077

 

 
2,733

 
(413
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Goodyear
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
753

 
1,737

 

 
2,490

 
(337
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Goodyear
 
Terrell
 
TX
 
15,350

 
2,516

 
34,804

 

 
37,320

 
(8,779
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998

F-138



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
The Gorilla Glue Company
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
5,563

 
34,887

 

 
40,450

 
(468
)
 
7/28/2017
 
1978
Grandy's
 
Ardmore
 
OK
 

 
454

 

 

 
454

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Moore
 
OK
 

 
320

 
428

 

 
748

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
260

 
380

 

 
640

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
320

 
289

 

 
609

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
734

 

 

 
734

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Carrollton
 
TX
 

 
773

 

 
(178
)
 
595

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Carrollton
 
TX
 

 
847

 

 

 
847

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1986
Grandy's
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
725

 

 

 
725

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1981
Grandy's
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
357

 

 

 
357

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Grandy's
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
777

 

 

 
777

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Grandy's
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
811

 

 

 
811

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Grandy's
 
Garland
 
TX
 

 
623

 

 

 
623

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Grandy's
 
Garland
 
TX
 

 
859

 

 

 
859

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Grandy's
 
Greenville
 
TX
 

 
847

 

 

 
847

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Grandy's
 
Irving
 
TX
 

 
871

 

 

 
871

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Grandy's
 
Lancaster
 
TX
 

 
780

 

 

 
780

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Grandy's
 
Mesquite
 
TX
 

 
871

 

 

 
871

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Grandy's
 
Plano
 
TX
 

 
871

 

 

 
871

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Greene's Energy Group
 
Broussard
 
LA
 

 
455

 
6,022

 

 
6,477

 
(833
)
 
6/12/2014
 
1980
Habanero's Mexican Grill
 
Hueytown
 
AL
 

 
60

 
639

 

 
699

 
(163
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Hanesbrands
 
Rural Hall
 
NC
 
18,100

 
1,798

 
41,214

 
(50
)
 
42,962

 
(7,406
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1992
Hanesbrands
 
Rural Hall
 
NC
 
17,990

 
1,082

 
22,565

 

 
23,647

 
(7,169
)
 
12/21/2012
 
1989
Hardee's
 
Morrilton
 
AR
 

 
175

 
937

 

 
1,112

 
(197
)
 
3/28/2014
 
1986
Hardee's
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
875

 
583

 

 
1,458

 
(137
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Hardee's
 
Pace
 
FL
 

 
419

 
435

 

 
854

 
(110
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1991
Hardee's
 
Williston
 
FL
 

 
395

 
553

 

 
948

 
(139
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Hardee's
 
Bremen
 
GA
 

 
129

 
518

 

 
647

 
(122
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Hardee's
 
Canton
 
GA
 

 
488

 
539

 

 
1,027

 
(136
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Hardee's
 
Mount Vernon
 
IA
 

 
320

 
480

 
(6
)
 
794

 
(121
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Hardee's
 
Indian Trail
 
NC
 

 
777

 
553

 

 
1,330

 
(134
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Hardee's
 
Old Fort
 
NC
 

 
300

 
904

 

 
1,204

 
(223
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-139



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Hardee's
 
Sparta
 
NC
 

 
372

 
346

 

 
718

 
(87
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Hardee's
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
207

 
483

 

 
690

 
(113
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Hardee's
 
Jefferson
 
OH
 

 
242

 
363

 

 
605

 
(85
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Hardee's
 
Minerva
 
OH
 

 
214

 
321

 

 
535

 
(76
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Hardee's
 
Seville
 
OH
 

 
151

 
454

 

 
605

 
(107
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Hardee's
 
Aiken
 
SC
 

 
220

 
450

 

 
670

 
(111
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Hardee's
 
Chapin
 
SC
 

 
380

 
741

 

 
1,121

 
(183
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Hardee's
 
Chester
 
SC
 

 
586

 
563

 

 
1,149

 
(104
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Hardee's
 
Bloomingdale
 
TN
 

 
270

 
844

 

 
1,114

 
(208
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Hardee's
 
Clinton
 
TN
 

 
390

 
893

 

 
1,283

 
(221
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Hardee's
 
Crossville
 
TN
 

 
300

 
689

 

 
989

 
(170
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Hardee's
 
Erwin
 
TN
 

 
346

 
406

 

 
752

 
(102
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
Hardee's
 
Morristown
 
TN
 

 
353

 
431

 

 
784

 
(101
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Hardee's
 
Springfield
 
TN
 

 
343

 
515

 

 
858

 
(121
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Hardee's / Red Burrito
 
Attalla
 
AL
 

 
220

 
896

 

 
1,116

 
(221
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Harley Davidson
 
Round Rock
 
TX
 

 
1,688

 
9,563

 

 
11,251

 
(2,537
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2008
Harps Grocery
 
Cabot
 
AR
 

 
270

 
4,664

 

 
4,934

 
(989
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2014
Harps Grocery
 
Haskell
 
AR
 

 
499

 
3,281

 

 
3,780

 
(685
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Harps Grocery
 
Hot Springs
 
AR
 

 
592

 
4,353

 

 
4,945

 
(904
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Harps Grocery
 
Hot Springs
 
AR
 

 
839

 
4,486

 

 
5,325

 
(887
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Harps Grocery
 
Searcy
 
AR
 

 
705

 
4,159

 

 
4,864

 
(835
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Harps Grocery
 
West Fork
 
AR
 

 
635

 
4,708

 

 
5,343

 
(951
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Harps Grocery
 
Poplar Bluff
 
MO
 

 
572

 
2,991

 
4

 
3,567

 
(290
)
 
2/21/2014
 
2014
Harps Grocery
 
Inola
 
OK
 

 
130

 
3,387

 

 
3,517

 
(680
)
 
3/5/2014
 
2014
Harris Teeter
 
Durham
 
NC
 
1,910

 
3,239

 

 

 
3,239

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2009
HD Supply
 
Santee
 
CA
 

 
2,400

 
7,312

 
430

 
10,142

 
(1,908
)
 
2/21/2014
 
1995
Healthnow
 
Buffalo
 
NY
 
41,555

 
2,569

 
89,399

 

 
91,968

 
(13,871
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Helmer Scientific
 
Noblesville
 
IN
 

 
1,431

 
10,699

 

 
12,130

 
(137
)
 
7/27/2017
 
2012
Hobby Lobby
 
Algonquin
 
IL
 

 
998

 
4,580

 

 
5,578

 
(76
)
 
6/23/2017
 
2012
Hobby Lobby
 
Avon
 
IN
 

 
1,439

 
5,855

 

 
7,294

 
(1,129
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Hobby Lobby
 
Kannapolis
 
NC
 

 
1,929

 
4,227

 

 
6,156

 
(849
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Hobby Lobby
 
Columbia
 
TN
 

 
951

 
2,467

 
38

 
3,456

 
(563
)
 
2/26/2014
 
1986

F-140



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Hobby Lobby
 
Logan
 
UT
 

 
2,683

 
3,079

 

 
5,762

 
(671
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Home Depot
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
6,251

 

 

 
6,251

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Home Depot
 
San Diego
 
CA
 
6,650

 
12,518

 

 

 
12,518

 

 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Home Depot
 
Evans
 
GA
 

 
4,583

 

 

 
4,583

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Home Depot
 
Kennesaw
 
GA
 

 
1,809

 
12,331

 
1

 
14,141

 
(2,203
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Home Depot
 
Slidell
 
LA
 
1,996

 
5,131

 

 

 
5,131

 

 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Home Depot
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
7,907

 

 

 
7,907

 

 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Home Depot
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
2,911

 
15,463

 

 
18,374

 
(4,986
)
 
11/9/2009
 
2009
Home Depot
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
1,599

 

 

 
1,599

 

 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Home Depot
 
Winchester
 
VA
 

 
3,955

 
18,405

 
1,136

 
23,496

 
(5,339
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Home Town Buffet
 
Rialto
 
CA
 

 
265

 
1,261

 
(1,046
)
 
480

 
(108
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Home Town Buffet
 
Santa Maria
 
CA
 

 
191

 
1,006

 
(763
)
 
434

 
(55
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2002
Home Town Buffet
 
Newark
 
DE
 

 
177

 
1,129

 
(739
)
 
567

 
(95
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1983
Home Town Buffet
 
Union Gap
 
WA
 

 
253

 
1,320

 
(1,223
)
 
350

 
(75
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2002
Houghton Town Center
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
1,176

 
8,565

 

 
9,741

 
(9
)
 
12/28/2017
 
2017
Huntington National Bank
 
Conneaut
 
OH
 

 
205

 
477

 
6

 
688

 
(108
)
 
10/1/2013
 
1971
Huntington National Bank
 
Jefferson
 
OH
 

 
255

 
765

 
7

 
1,027

 
(173
)
 
10/1/2013
 
1963
Hy-Vee
 
Vermillion
 
SD
 
2,922

 
409

 
3,684

 

 
4,093

 
(1,219
)
 
4/8/2013
 
1986
IFM Efectors
 
Malvern
 
PA
 

 
1,816

 

 
9,747

 
11,563

 
(840
)
 
8/27/2014
 
2014
Igloo
 
Katy
 
TX
 

 
5,617

 
38,470

 

 
44,087

 
(6,887
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
IHOP
 
Auburn
 
AL
 

 
1,111

 
933

 

 
2,044

 
(243
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
IHOP
 
Homewood
 
AL
 

 
610

 
1,762

 

 
2,372

 
(450
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
941

 

 
(517
)
 
424

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1998
IHOP
 
Castle Rock
 
CO
 

 
320

 
2,334

 

 
2,654

 
(597
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Greeley
 
CO
 

 
120

 
1,538

 

 
1,658

 
(393
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Loveland
 
CO
 

 
181

 
1,534

 

 
1,715

 
(53
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Pueblo
 
CO
 

 
330

 
1,589

 

 
1,919

 
(406
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Bossier City
 
LA
 

 
541

 
1,342

 

 
1,883

 
(349
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
IHOP
 
Natchitoches
 
LA
 

 
750

 
89

 

 
839

 
(23
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Roseville
 
MI
 

 
340

 
1,071

 
125

 
1,536

 
(275
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
630

 
1,002

 

 
1,632

 
(256
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Southaven
 
MS
 

 
350

 
2,108

 

 
2,458

 
(539
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-141



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
IHOP
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
610

 
1,551

 

 
2,161

 
(396
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Clarksville
 
TN
 

 
530

 
1,346

 

 
1,876

 
(344
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Murfreesboro
 
TN
 

 
600

 
1,687

 

 
2,287

 
(431
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Baytown
 
TX
 

 
698

 
1,297

 

 
1,995

 
(305
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
IHOP
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
1,176

 

 

 
1,176

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
560

 
1,879

 

 
2,439

 
(480
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
760

 
2,462

 

 
3,222

 
(629
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Killeen
 
TX
 

 
380

 
1,028

 

 
1,408

 
(263
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Lake Jackson
 
TX
 

 
370

 
2,018

 

 
2,388

 
(516
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Leon Valley
 
TX
 

 
650

 
2,055

 

 
2,705

 
(665
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
IHOP
 
Auburn
 
WA
 

 
780

 
1,878

 

 
2,658

 
(480
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Ingersoll Rand
 
Annandale
 
NJ
 

 
1,367

 
14,223

 
(90
)
 
15,500

 
(5,249
)
 
4/30/2014
 
1999
Ingram Micro
 
Amherst
 
NY
 

 
4,107

 
20,347

 

 
24,454

 
(4,068
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1986
Invensys Systems
 
Foxboro
 
MA
 

 
11,784

 

 
27,888

 
39,672

 
(3,504
)
 
6/27/2014
 
1965
Iron Mountain
 
Columbus
 
OH
 

 
405

 
3,642

 
1,263

 
5,310

 
(1,217
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1954
Iron Mountain
 
Mohnton
 
PA
 

 
197

 
6,152

 

 
6,349

 
(1,032
)
 
7/2/2014
 
1979
IRS Gateway Center
 
Covington
 
KY
 

 
3,120

 
80,689

 
1,561

 
85,370

 
(12,096
)
 
6/5/2014
 
1994
Irving Oil
 
Belfast
 
ME
 

 
339

 
698

 

 
1,037

 
(170
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Irving Oil
 
Bethel
 
ME
 

 
182

 
331

 

 
513

 
(83
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Irving Oil
 
Boothbay Harbor
 
ME
 

 
413

 
550

 

 
963

 
(143
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Irving Oil
 
Caribou
 
ME
 

 
187

 
404

 

 
591

 
(97
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Irving Oil
 
Fort Kent
 
ME
 

 
358

 
352

 

 
710

 
(100
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1973
Irving Oil
 
Kennebunk
 
ME
 

 
469

 
541

 

 
1,010

 
(146
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1980
Irving Oil
 
Lincoln
 
ME
 

 
360

 
360

 

 
720

 
(91
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Irving Oil
 
Orono
 
ME
 

 
228

 
272

 

 
500

 
(66
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1984
Irving Oil
 
Saco
 
ME
 

 
619

 
222

 

 
841

 
(78
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Irving Oil
 
Skowhegan
 
ME
 

 
541

 
492

 

 
1,033

 
(135
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Irving Oil
 
Conway
 
NH
 

 
173

 
525

 

 
698

 
(119
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Irving Oil
 
Dover
 
NH
 

 
380

 
717

 

 
1,097

 
(170
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Irving Oil
 
Rochester
 
NH
 

 
290

 
747

 

 
1,037

 
(171
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1970
Irving Oil
 
Dummerston
 
VT
 

 
185

 
353

 

 
538

 
(95
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Irving Oil
 
Rutland
 
VT
 

 
249

 
220

 

 
469

 
(54
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1984

F-142



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Irving Oil
 
Westminster
 
VT
 

 
108

 
437

 

 
545

 
(104
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Jack in the Box
 
Avondale
 
AZ
 

 
110

 
2,237

 

 
2,347

 
(553
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Chandler
 
AZ
 

 
450

 
1,447

 

 
1,897

 
(358
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Folsom
 
CA
 

 
280

 
2,423

 

 
2,703

 
(599
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Sacramento
 
CA
 

 
476

 
1,110

 

 
1,586

 
(261
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Jack in the Box
 
West Sacramento
 
CA
 

 
590

 
1,710

 

 
2,300

 
(422
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Burley
 
ID
 

 
240

 
1,430

 

 
1,670

 
(353
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Belleville
 
IL
 

 
200

 
966

 

 
1,166

 
(239
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Florissant
 
MO
 

 
502

 
1,515

 

 
2,017

 
(374
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
420

 
1,494

 

 
1,914

 
(369
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Salem
 
OR
 

 
580

 
1,301

 

 
1,881

 
(322
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Tigard
 
OR
 

 
620

 
1,361

 

 
1,981

 
(336
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
420

 
1,325

 

 
1,745

 
(327
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
420

 
1,365

 

 
1,785

 
(337
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Cleburne
 
TX
 

 
291

 
1,647

 

 
1,938

 
(387
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Jack in the Box
 
Corinth
 
TX
 

 
400

 
1,416

 

 
1,816

 
(350
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Farmers Branch
 
TX
 

 
460

 
1,640

 

 
2,100

 
(405
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
490

 
1,702

 

 
2,192

 
(421
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Georgetown
 
TX
 

 
600

 
1,508

 

 
2,108

 
(373
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Granbury
 
TX
 

 
380

 
1,449

 

 
1,829

 
(358
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Grand Prairie
 
TX
 

 
600

 
1,856

 

 
2,456

 
(459
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Grapevine
 
TX
 

 
470

 
1,344

 

 
1,814

 
(332
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Gun Barrel City
 
TX
 

 
300

 
961

 
(866
)
 
395

 
(9
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
460

 
1,437

 

 
1,897

 
(355
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
390

 
1,172

 

 
1,562

 
(290
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
330

 
1,845

 

 
2,175

 
(456
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
410

 
1,621

 

 
2,031

 
(401
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
450

 
1,396

 

 
1,846

 
(345
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-143



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Jack in the Box
 
Hutchins
 
TX
 

 
330

 
1,363

 

 
1,693

 
(337
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Lufkin
 
TX
 

 
440

 
1,544

 

 
1,984

 
(381
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Lufkin
 
TX
 

 
450

 
1,563

 

 
2,013

 
(386
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Mesquite
 
TX
 

 
560

 
1,652

 

 
2,212

 
(408
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Missouri City
 
TX
 

 
451

 
837

 

 
1,288

 
(197
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Jack in the Box
 
Nacogdoches
 
TX
 

 
340

 
1,320

 

 
1,660

 
(326
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Orange
 
TX
 

 
270

 
1,661

 

 
1,931

 
(410
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Port Arthur
 
TX
 

 
460

 
1,405

 

 
1,865

 
(347
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
400

 
1,244

 

 
1,644

 
(307
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
470

 
1,256

 

 
1,726

 
(310
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
350

 
1,249

 

 
1,599

 
(309
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Spring
 
TX
 

 
570

 
1,340

 

 
1,910

 
(331
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Spring
 
TX
 

 
450

 
1,487

 

 
1,937

 
(367
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Texas City
 
TX
 

 
454

 
844

 

 
1,298

 
(212
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1991
Jack in the Box
 
Tyler
 
TX
 

 
450

 
1,025

 

 
1,475

 
(253
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Weatherford
 
TX
 

 
480

 
1,329

 

 
1,809

 
(328
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jack in the Box
 
Enumclaw
 
WA
 

 
380

 
1,238

 

 
1,618

 
(306
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Jeremiah's Italian Ice
 
Winter Springs
 
FL
 

 
734

 

 

 
734

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Jiffy Lube
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
423

 
1,037

 

 
1,460

 
(180
)
 
6/9/2014
 
2008
Jo-Ann's
 
Shakopee
 
MN
 

 
994

 
1,807

 

 
2,801

 
(350
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Johnny Carinos
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
997

 
2,540

 

 
3,537

 
(661
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Johnny Carinos
 
Columbus
 
IN
 

 
809

 
1,888

 

 
2,697

 
(491
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2004
Johnny Carinos
 
Muncie
 
IN
 

 
540

 
2,160

 

 
2,700

 
(562
)
 
8/30/2013
 
2003
Johnny Carinos
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
1,328

 
2,656

 

 
3,984

 
(692
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2002
Johnny Carinos
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
998

 
2,329

 

 
3,327

 
(618
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Katun Corp.
 
Davenport
 
IA
 

 
454

 
7,485

 

 
7,939

 
(1,158
)
 
5/6/2014
 
1993
Keane Frac
 
Pleasanton
 
TX
 

 
328

 
4,804

 
(2,858
)
 
2,274

 
(148
)
 
9/25/2014
 
2014
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Bloomington
 
IL
 

 
576

 
1,466

 

 
2,042

 
(369
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2004
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Charleston
 
IL
 

 
282

 
1,514

 

 
1,796

 
(381
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2003
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Decatur
 
IL
 

 
276

 
1,619

 

 
1,895

 
(407
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Dolton
 
IL
 

 
167

 
946

 

 
1,113

 
(223
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1975
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Elmhurst
 
IL
 

 
242

 
969

 

 
1,211

 
(228
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990

F-144



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Hazel Crest
 
IL
 

 
153

 
1,376

 

 
1,529

 
(324
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Homewood
 
IL
 

 
660

 
1,541

 

 
2,201

 
(362
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Matteson
 
IL
 

 
399

 
2,259

 

 
2,658

 
(531
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Mattoon
 
IL
 

 
113

 
1,019

 

 
1,132

 
(240
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Oak Forest
 
IL
 

 
185

 
1,047

 

 
1,232

 
(246
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1955
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Rockford
 
IL
 

 
201

 
1,142

 

 
1,343

 
(268
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Springfield
 
IL
 

 
267

 
1,068

 

 
1,335

 
(251
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Springfield
 
IL
 

 
212

 
1,203

 

 
1,415

 
(283
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Westchester
 
IL
 

 
238

 
952

 

 
1,190

 
(224
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Crawfordsville
 
IN
 

 
159

 
1,068

 

 
1,227

 
(269
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1979
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Frankfort
 
IN
 

 
99

 
893

 

 
992

 
(210
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Franklin
 
IN
 

 
205

 
1,375

 

 
1,580

 
(346
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Greenwood
 
IN
 

 
339

 
1,405

 

 
1,744

 
(354
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Lebanon
 
IN
 

 
337

 
1,348

 

 
1,685

 
(317
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Deming
 
NM
 

 
220

 
691

 

 
911

 
(171
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Las Cruces
 
NM
 

 
270

 
498

 

 
768

 
(123
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Warren
 
OH
 

 
426

 
640

 
(421
)
 
645

 
(31
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
New Kensington
 
PA
 

 
324

 
487

 
(260
)
 
551

 
(26
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1967
Kentucky Fried Chicken
 
Appleton
 
WI
 

 
350

 
874

 

 
1,224

 
(216
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Granite City
 
IL
 

 
102

 
1,083

 

 
1,185

 
(273
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Allison Park
 
PA
 

 
246

 
683

 

 
929

 
(172
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Germantown
 
WI
 

 
368

 
913

 

 
1,281

 
(230
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1989
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Green Bay
 
WI
 

 
208

 
1,022

 

 
1,230

 
(257
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
396

 
773

 

 
1,169

 
(194
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
281

 
795

 

 
1,076

 
(200
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
89

 
750

 

 
839

 
(189
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1989
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
197

 
975

 

 
1,172

 
(245
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
138

 
924

 

 
1,062

 
(233
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
South Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
197

 
695

 

 
892

 
(175
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
Wauwatosa
 
WI
 

 
135

 
615

 

 
750

 
(155
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W
 
West Bend
 
WI
 

 
185

 
705

 

 
890

 
(177
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1972
Ker's WingHouse Bar and Grill
 
Brandon
 
FL
 

 
340

 
654

 

 
994

 
(167
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-145



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Ker's WingHouse Bar and Grill
 
Clearwater
 
FL
 

 
550

 
627

 

 
1,177

 
(160
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Kettle Restaurant
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
168

 
206

 

 
374

 
(48
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1965
Key Bank
 
Spencerport
 
NY
 

 
59

 
1,112

 

 
1,171

 
(271
)
 
6/5/2013
 
1960
Kirklands
 
Wilmington
 
NC
 

 
1,127

 
1,061

 

 
2,188

 
(222
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Kohl's
 
Monrovia
 
CA
 
8,700

 
8,052

 
7,891

 

 
15,943

 
(1,542
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1982
Kohl's
 
Tavares
 
FL
 
4,670

 
4,173

 

 

 
4,173

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Kohl's
 
Fort Dodge
 
IA
 

 
1,431

 
3,109

 

 
4,540

 
(609
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Kohl's
 
Salina
 
KS
 

 
964

 
5,009

 

 
5,973

 
(877
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Kohl's
 
Howell
 
MI
 
7,705

 
547

 
10,399

 

 
10,946

 
(3,501
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2003
Kohl's
 
Saginaw
 
MI
 

 
1,110

 
6,932

 

 
8,042

 
(1,212
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Kohl's
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
1,532

 
14,561

 

 
16,093

 
(2,413
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Kohl's
 
Spartanburg
 
SC
 

 
2,984

 
5,842

 

 
8,826

 
(1,089
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Kohl's
 
Brownsville
 
TX
 

 
2,756

 
3,423

 

 
6,179

 
(30
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Kohl's
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 
3,479

 
1,286

 
7,321

 

 
8,607

 
(1,319
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Kohl's
 
Rice Lake
 
WI
 

 
1,268

 
7,788

 

 
9,056

 
(1,365
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Kroger
 
Calhoun
 
GA
 

 

 
6,279

 

 
6,279

 
(1,293
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1996
Kroger
 
Lithonia
 
GA
 

 

 
6,250

 

 
6,250

 
(1,287
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
Kroger
 
Suwanee
 
GA
 

 

 
7,574

 

 
7,574

 
(1,560
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
Kroger
 
Suwanee
 
GA
 

 

 
7,691

 

 
7,691

 
(1,584
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1993
Kroger
 
Frankfort
 
KY
 

 

 
5,794

 

 
5,794

 
(1,193
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
Kroger
 
Madisonville
 
KY
 

 

 
5,715

 

 
5,715

 
(1,177
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1996
Kroger
 
Murray
 
KY
 

 

 
6,165

 

 
6,165

 
(1,269
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
Kroger
 
Owensboro
 
KY
 

 

 
6,073

 

 
6,073

 
(1,251
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1996
Kroger
 
Franklin
 
TN
 

 

 
7,782

 

 
7,782

 
(1,602
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1996
Kroger
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 

 
7,642

 

 
7,642

 
(1,574
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1996
Krystal
 
Greenville
 
AL
 

 
195

 
1,147

 
182

 
1,524

 
(306
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Krystal
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
348

 
811

 

 
1,159

 
(269
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1960
Krystal
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
352

 
654

 
125

 
1,131

 
(221
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1971
Krystal
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
305

 
712

 
125

 
1,142

 
(232
)
 
6/10/2013
 
1985
Krystal
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
259

 
1,036

 

 
1,295

 
(374
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1964
Krystal
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
560

 
829

 
175

 
1,564

 
(227
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Krystal
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
303

 
562

 
125

 
990

 
(191
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1962

F-146



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Krystal
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
502

 
613

 

 
1,115

 
(203
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1962
Krystal
 
Scottsboro
 
AL
 

 
20

 
1,157

 
172

 
1,349

 
(307
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Krystal
 
Tuscaloosa
 
AL
 

 
206

 
1,165

 

 
1,371

 
(420
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1976
Krystal
 
Valley
 
AL
 

 
297

 
694

 
125

 
1,116

 
(233
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1979
Krystal
 
Vestavia Hills
 
AL
 

 
342

 
513

 

 
855

 
(170
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1995
Krystal
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
574

 
574

 

 
1,148

 
(207
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1990
Krystal
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
372

 
372

 
125

 
869

 
(135
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1994
Krystal
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
669

 
446

 

 
1,115

 
(161
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1995
Krystal
 
Plant City
 
FL
 

 
355

 
533

 

 
888

 
(192
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2012
Krystal
 
St. Augustine
 
FL
 

 
411

 
411

 
125

 
947

 
(150
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2012
Krystal
 
Albany
 
GA
 

 
309

 
721

 

 
1,030

 
(260
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1962
Krystal
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
166

 
664

 

 
830

 
(240
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1973
Krystal
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
365

 
851

 

 
1,216

 
(307
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1979
Krystal
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
622

 
934

 

 
1,556

 
(337
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1977
Krystal
 
Decatur
 
GA
 

 
94

 
533

 

 
627

 
(192
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1965
Krystal
 
East Point
 
GA
 

 
221

 
664

 

 
885

 
(238
)
 
10/26/2012
 
1984
Krystal
 
Macon
 
GA
 

 
325

 
759

 

 
1,084

 
(274
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1962
Krystal
 
Milledgeville
 
GA
 

 
261

 
609

 

 
870

 
(220
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2011
Krystal
 
Snellville
 
GA
 

 
466

 
466

 

 
932

 
(168
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1981
Krystal
 
Corinth
 
MS
 

 
279

 
652

 
125

 
1,056

 
(219
)
 
4/23/2013
 
2007
Krystal
 
Gulfport
 
MS
 

 
215

 
861

 

 
1,076

 
(311
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2011
Krystal
 
Pearl
 
MS
 

 
426

 
638

 

 
1,064

 
(230
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1976
Krystal
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
336

 
784

 

 
1,120

 
(283
)
 
9/21/2012
 
2010
Krystal
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
186

 
328

 

 
514

 
(56
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Krystal
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
440

 
659

 

 
1,099

 
(219
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1983
Krystal
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
369

 
246

 

 
615

 
(89
)
 
9/21/2012
 
1970
Krystal
 
Lawrenceburg
 
TN
 

 
304

 
709

 

 
1,013

 
(235
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1980
Krystal
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
257

 
1,029

 

 
1,286

 
(341
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1975
Krystal
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
181

 
723

 

 
904

 
(240
)
 
4/23/2013
 
1972
Krystal
 
Murfreesboro
 
TN
 

 
465

 
698

 

 
1,163

 
(231
)
 
4/23/2013
 
2008
Kum & Go
 
Bentonville
 
AR
 

 
587

 
1,370

 
(13
)
 
1,944

 
(390
)
 
11/20/2012
 
2009
Kum & Go
 
Lowell
 
AR
 

 
774

 
1,437

 

 
2,211

 
(409
)
 
11/20/2012
 
2009

F-147



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Kum & Go
 
Paragould
 
AR
 

 
708

 
2,123

 

 
2,831

 
(614
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
668

 
1,559

 

 
2,227

 
(443
)
 
11/20/2012
 
2008
Kum & Go
 
Sherwood
 
AR
 

 
866

 
1,609

 

 
2,475

 
(465
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Fountain
 
CO
 

 
1,131

 
1,696

 

 
2,827

 
(478
)
 
12/24/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Monument
 
CO
 

 
1,192

 
1,457

 

 
2,649

 
(411
)
 
12/24/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Muscatine
 
IA
 

 
794

 
1,853

 

 
2,647

 
(522
)
 
12/27/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Ottumwa
 
IA
 

 
586

 
1,368

 

 
1,954

 
(389
)
 
11/20/2012
 
1998
Kum & Go
 
Sloan
 
IA
 

 
447

 
2,162

 

 
2,609

 
(531
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Kum & Go
 
Story City
 
IA
 

 
223

 
2,089

 

 
2,312

 
(457
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Kum & Go
 
Tipton
 
IA
 

 
507

 
1,945

 

 
2,452

 
(500
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Kum & Go
 
Waukee
 
IA
 

 
1,280

 
1,280

 

 
2,560

 
(344
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
West Branch
 
IA
 

 
219

 
1,089

 

 
1,308

 
(235
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Kum & Go
 
Joplin
 
MO
 

 
218

 
782

 

 
1,000

 
(225
)
 
2/11/2014
 
1987
Kum & Go
 
Joplin
 
MO
 

 
205

 
594

 

 
799

 
(173
)
 
2/11/2014
 
1986
Kum & Go
 
Neosho
 
MO
 

 
504

 
1,144

 

 
1,648

 
(256
)
 
2/11/2014
 
1997
Kum & Go
 
Tioga
 
ND
 

 
318

 
2,863

 

 
3,181

 
(814
)
 
11/8/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Muskogee
 
OK
 

 
423

 
1,691

 

 
2,114

 
(423
)
 
7/22/2013
 
2013
Kum & Go
 
Muskogee
 
OK
 

 
97

 
973

 

 
1,070

 
(161
)
 
9/30/2014
 
1999
Kum & Go
 
Cheyenne
 
WY
 

 
411

 
2,327

 

 
2,738

 
(656
)
 
12/27/2012
 
2012
Kum & Go
 
Gillette
 
WY
 

 
878

 
2,048

 

 
2,926

 
(522
)
 
6/28/2013
 
2013
L.A. Fitness
 
Avondale
 
AZ
 

 
2,253

 
9,040

 

 
11,293

 
(1,894
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
L.A. Fitness
 
Glendale
 
AZ
 
3,093

 
2,177

 
7,568

 
20

 
9,765

 
(1,721
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
L.A. Fitness
 
Marana
 
AZ
 

 
1,284

 
8,322

 

 
9,606

 
(1,814
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
L.A. Fitness
 
Highland
 
CA
 
4,547

 
2,274

 
8,673

 

 
10,947

 
(2,010
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
L.A. Fitness
 
Boynton Beach
 
FL
 

 
1,485

 
9,945

 

 
11,430

 
(334
)
 
11/22/2016
 
2005
L.A. Fitness
 
Miami
 
FL
 

 
2,730

 
8,671

 

 
11,401

 
(300
)
 
11/22/2016
 
2015
L.A. Fitness
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
1,084

 
6,500

 

 
7,584

 
(28
)
 
11/13/2017
 
2016
L.A. Fitness
 
Broadview
 
IL
 

 
3,345

 
8,763

 
276

 
12,384

 
(1,862
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
L.A. Fitness
 
Oswego
 
IL
 

 
3,163

 
8,749

 

 
11,912

 
(1,934
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
L.A. Fitness
 
Tinley Park
 
IL
 

 
1,722

 
8,976

 

 
10,698

 
(10
)
 
12/22/2017
 
2006
L.A. Fitness
 
Carmel
 
IN
 

 
1,457

 
9,562

 

 
11,019

 
(2,008
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
L.A. Fitness
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
1,279

 
8,970

 

 
10,249

 
(1,884
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009

F-148



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
L.A. Fitness
 
St. Clair Shores
 
MI
 

 
2,163

 
6,787

 

 
8,950

 
(254
)
 
11/22/2016
 
1982
L.A. Fitness
 
Oakdale
 
MN
 
4,749

 
2,315

 
8,315

 

 
10,630

 
(1,821
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
L.A. Fitness
 
Webster
 
NY
 

 
2,922

 
5,102

 

 
8,024

 
(62
)
 
8/1/2017
 
2014
L.A. Fitness
 
Edmond
 
OK
 

 
962

 
6,916

 

 
7,878

 
(1,320
)
 
3/31/2014
 
2014
L.A. Fitness
 
Easton
 
PA
 

 
938

 
10,600

 
152

 
11,690

 
(2,237
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1979
L.A. Fitness
 
Dallas
 
TX
 
4,712

 
2,629

 
10,413

 

 
13,042

 
(2,079
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
L.A. Fitness
 
Denton
 
TX
 
3,831

 
1,888

 
9,568

 
(6
)
 
11,450

 
(1,966
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
L.A. Fitness
 
Duncanville
 
TX
 

 
1,538

 
10,023

 

 
11,561

 
(2,025
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
L.A. Fitness
 
Mckinney
 
TX
 

 
2,039

 
7,787

 

 
9,826

 
(273
)
 
11/22/2016
 
2005
L.A. Fitness
 
Rowlett
 
TX
 

 
2,539

 
7,668

 
6

 
10,213

 
(163
)
 
4/11/2017
 
2006
L.A. Fitness
 
Spring
 
TX
 

 
1,970

 
9,290

 

 
11,260

 
(1,903
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Lamrite West
 
Strongsville
 
OH
 

 
3,078

 
34,076

 

 
37,154

 
(338
)
 
8/21/2017
 
1999
Leeann Chin
 
Blaine
 
MN
 

 
480

 
528

 

 
1,008

 
(130
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Leeann Chin
 
Chanhassen
 
MN
 

 
450

 
763

 

 
1,213

 
(189
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Leeann Chin
 
Golden Valley
 
MN
 

 
270

 
776

 

 
1,046

 
(192
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken
 
Florissant
 
MO
 

 
306

 
560

 

 
866

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken
 
St. Ann
 
MO
 

 
187

 
571

 

 
758

 
(144
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
107

 
874

 

 
981

 
(220
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Logan's Roadhouse
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
520

 
4,797

 
(1,363
)
 
3,954

 
(573
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Logan's Roadhouse
 
Fayetteville
 
AR
 

 
1,570

 
2,182

 
(953
)
 
2,799

 
(251
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Logan's Roadhouse
 
Hattiesburg
 
MS
 

 
890

 
4,012

 
(803
)
 
4,099

 
(533
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Logan's Roadhouse
 
Owasso
 
OK
 

 
1,449

 
2,173

 
(568
)
 
3,054

 
(291
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2006
Logan's Roadhouse
 
Clarksville
 
TN
 

 
1,010

 
4,424

 
(1,264
)
 
4,170

 
(540
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Logan's Roadhouse
 
Cleveland
 
TN
 

 
890

 
3,902

 
(1,225
)
 
3,567

 
(462
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Logan's Roadhouse
 
El Paso
 
TX
 

 
320

 
4,731

 
(1,558
)
 
3,493

 
(528
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Merced
 
CA
 

 
174

 
695

 

 
869

 
(163
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Collinsville
 
IL
 

 
220

 
940

 

 
1,160

 
(237
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2006
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Fairview Heights
 
IL
 

 
258

 
525

 

 
783

 
(132
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Jacksonville
 
IL
 

 
171

 
431

 

 
602

 
(109
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Litchfield
 
IL
 

 
194

 
996

 

 
1,190

 
(251
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986

F-149



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Marion
 
IL
 

 
305

 
1,059

 

 
1,364

 
(267
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Mount Carmel
 
IL
 

 
105

 
484

 

 
589

 
(122
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Vandalia
 
IL
 

 
101

 
484

 

 
585

 
(122
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
West Frankfort
 
IL
 

 
244

 
996

 

 
1,240

 
(251
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Wood River
 
IL
 

 
251

 
314

 

 
565

 
(79
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1975
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Garden City
 
KS
 

 
120

 
530

 

 
650

 
(133
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Hays
 
KS
 

 
160

 
624

 

 
784

 
(157
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Clovis
 
NM
 

 
210

 
705

 
(377
)
 
538

 
(40
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Fairborn
 
OH
 

 
103

 
300

 

 
403

 
(75
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Penn Hills
 
PA
 

 
438

 
656

 

 
1,094

 
(154
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Long John Silver's / A&W
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
459

 
477

 

 
936

 
(120
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Long John Silver's / KFC
 
Green Bay
 
WI
 

 
748

 
563

 

 
1,311

 
(142
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Long John Silver's / Taco Bell
 
Ashtabula
 
OH
 

 
440

 
1,640

 

 
2,080

 
(405
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Longhorn Steakhouse
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
370

 
1,852

 

 
2,222

 
(473
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Longhorn Steakhouse
 
Paducah
 
KY
 

 
1,121

 
1,443

 
(2,072
)
 
492

 
(2
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Los Tios Mexican Restaurant
 
Dalton
 
OH
 

 
18

 
30

 

 
48

 
(8
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1990
Lowe's
 
Jonesboro
 
AR
 

 
2,101

 
8,405

 
185

 
10,691

 
(1,567
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1994
Lowe's
 
Burlington
 
IA
 

 
2,775

 
8,191

 
819

 
11,785

 
(1,527
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Lowe's
 
Florence
 
KY
 

 
4,814

 
10,189

 
250

 
15,253

 
(1,877
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Lowe's
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 
13,069

 
10,315

 
20,728

 

 
31,043

 
(4,268
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2005
Lowe's
 
Sanford
 
ME
 
4,672

 
4,045

 

 

 
4,045

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Lowe's
 
Windham
 
ME
 
7,930

 
12,640

 

 

 
12,640

 

 
6/3/2013
 
2006
Lowe's
 
Benton Harbor
 
MI
 

 
1,011

 
7,851

 
245

 
9,107

 
(1,517
)
 
3/17/2014
 
1994
Lowe's
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 

 
3,729

 

 

 
3,729

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Lowe's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
11,499

 

 

 
11,499

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Lowe's
 
Ticonderoga
 
NY
 
4,345

 
1,812

 

 

 
1,812

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Lowe's
 
West Carrollton
 
OH
 
6,375

 
2,864

 
9,883

 

 
12,747

 
(1,715
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Lowe's
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
5,485

 

 

 
5,485

 

 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Lowe's
 
Texas City
 
TX
 

 
2,313

 
9,253

 

 
11,566

 
(2,336
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1995
Lube Stop
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
79

 
287

 

 
366

 
(44
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1988
Lube Stop
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
135

 
761

 

 
896

 
(120
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1995
Lube Stop
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 
205

 
1,043

 

 
1,248

 
(161
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1992

F-150



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Lube Stop
 
Bedford Heights
 
OH
 

 
156

 
529

 

 
685

 
(89
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1986
Lube Stop
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
127

 
559

 

 
686

 
(86
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1988
Lube Stop
 
Fairview Park
 
OH
 

 
205

 
179

 

 
384

 
(41
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1988
Lube Stop
 
Lakewood
 
OH
 

 
205

 
765

 

 
970

 
(121
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1993
Lube Stop
 
Mayfield Heights
 
OH
 

 
201

 
430

 

 
631

 
(71
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1988
Lube Stop
 
Medina
 
OH
 

 
135

 
414

 
(5
)
 
544

 
(70
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1995
Lube Stop
 
N. Barberton
 
OH
 

 
140

 
502

 

 
642

 
(77
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1998
Lube Stop
 
Painesville
 
OH
 

 
276

 
208

 

 
484

 
(43
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1988
Lube Stop
 
Parma
 
OH
 

 
124

 
390

 

 
514

 
(58
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1986
Lube Stop
 
Parma
 
OH
 

 
306

 
502

 

 
808

 
(86
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1986
Lube Stop
 
Seven Hills
 
OH
 

 
182

 
201

 

 
383

 
(39
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1987
Lube Stop
 
Solon
 
OH
 

 
233

 
487

 

 
720

 
(78
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1992
Lube Stop
 
South Euclid
 
OH
 

 
109

 
561

 

 
670

 
(80
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1986
Lube Stop
 
Stow
 
OH
 

 
230

 
132

 

 
362

 
(28
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1988
Lube Stop
 
Westlake
 
OH
 

 
85

 
525

 

 
610

 
(74
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1999
Lube Stop
 
Willoughby
 
OH
 

 
168

 
425

 

 
593

 
(66
)
 
9/2/2014
 
1986
Lumber Liquidators
 
Saginaw
 
MI
 

 
287

 
502

 

 
789

 
(101
)
 
5/28/2014
 
2000
Mars Petcare
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
1,875

 
19,591

 
(987
)
 
20,479

 
(2,878
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2014
Mastec
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
369

 
2,669

 

 
3,038

 
(435
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Daphne
 
AL
 

 
528

 
1,233

 

 
1,761

 
(291
)
 
10/1/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Dothan
 
AL
 

 
406

 
1,217

 

 
1,623

 
(316
)
 
5/14/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
321

 
1,284

 

 
1,605

 
(351
)
 
2/6/2013
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Destin
 
FL
 

 
693

 
1,287

 

 
1,980

 
(328
)
 
6/5/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Melbourne
 
FL
 

 
405

 
1,237

 

 
1,642

 
(259
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Mattress Firm
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
924

 
1,386

 

 
2,310

 
(360
)
 
5/14/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Boise
 
ID
 

 
335

 
1,339

 

 
1,674

 
(367
)
 
2/22/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Garden City
 
ID
 

 
492

 
1,305

 

 
1,797

 
(257
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2003
Mattress Firm
 
Fairview Heights
 
IL
 

 
231

 
958

 

 
1,189

 
(219
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1977
Mattress Firm
 
Columbus
 
IN
 

 
157

 
891

 

 
1,048

 
(253
)
 
11/6/2012
 
1964
Mattress Firm
 
Evansville
 
IN
 

 
117

 
2,227

 

 
2,344

 
(610
)
 
2/11/2013
 
1995
Mattress Firm
 
Goshen
 
IN
 

 
211

 
1,555

 

 
1,766

 
(301
)
 
3/20/2014
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Mishawaka
 
IN
 

 
375

 
1,500

 

 
1,875

 
(376
)
 
7/30/2013
 
2013

F-151



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Mattress Firm
 
South Bend
 
IN
 

 
289

 
2,445

 

 
2,734

 
(486
)
 
2/24/2014
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Bowling Green
 
KY
 

 
648

 
973

 

 
1,621

 
(257
)
 
4/25/2013
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Lafayette
 
LA
 
1,194

 

 
1,251

 

 
1,251

 
(325
)
 
5/2/2013
 
1995
Mattress Firm
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
467

 
1,323

 

 
1,790

 
(210
)
 
8/19/2014
 
2014
Mattress Firm
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
409

 
1,164

 

 
1,573

 
(159
)
 
10/3/2014
 
2014
Mattress Firm
 
Goldsboro
 
NC
 

 
349

 
1,385

 

 
1,734

 
(215
)
 
5/29/2014
 
2014
Mattress Firm
 
Greenville
 
NC
 

 
1,085

 
1,085

 

 
2,170

 
(306
)
 
12/12/2012
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Raleigh
 
NC
 

 
1,091

 
1,091

 

 
2,182

 
(315
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1997
Mattress Firm
 
Wilmington
 
NC
 

 
412

 
1,257

 

 
1,669

 
(341
)
 
3/29/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Wilson
 
NC
 

 
373

 
692

 

 
1,065

 
(200
)
 
9/28/2012
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Painesville
 
OH
 

 
437

 
1,318

 

 
1,755

 
(222
)
 
7/10/2014
 
2014
Mattress Firm
 
Johnstown
 
PA
 

 
389

 
906

 
745

 
2,040

 
(198
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Mattress Firm
 
Florence
 
SC
 

 
398

 
929

 
(8
)
 
1,319

 
(261
)
 
12/7/2012
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Rock Hill
 
SC
 

 
385

 
898

 

 
1,283

 
(221
)
 
8/21/2013
 
2008
Mattress Firm
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
586

 
1,088

 

 
1,674

 
(293
)
 
3/19/2013
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Nederland
 
TX
 

 
311

 
1,245

 

 
1,556

 
(360
)
 
9/26/2012
 
1997
Mattress Firm
 
Bountiful
 
UT
 

 
736

 
1,367

 

 
2,103

 
(385
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2012
Mattress Firm
 
Spokane
 
WA
 

 
409

 
1,685

 

 
2,094

 
(453
)
 
4/4/2013
 
2013
Mattress Firm
 
Spokane
 
WA
 

 
511

 
1,582

 

 
2,093

 
(434
)
 
3/28/2013
 
2013
McAlisters
 
Murfreesboro
 
TN
 

 
310

 
720

 

 
1,030

 
(184
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
McAlisters
 
Sherman
 
TX
 

 
563

 
1,223

 

 
1,786

 
(254
)
 
5/16/2014
 
2013
McAlisters
 
Waco
 
TX
 

 
429

 
791

 

 
1,220

 
(188
)
 
3/27/2014
 
2000
McDonald's
 
Scotland Neck
 
NC
 

 
320

 

 

 
320

 

 
6/27/2013
 
2005
MDC Holdings Inc.
 
Denver
 
CO
 

 
12,648

 
66,398

 
397

 
79,443

 
(14,281
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2001
MedAssets
 
Plano
 
TX
 

 
10,432

 
45,650

 

 
56,082

 
(7,870
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
The Medicines Co.
 
Parsippany
 
NJ
 
27,700

 
5,150

 
50,051

 
523

 
55,724

 
(8,992
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Melrose Park Center
 
Melrose Park
 
IL
 

 
6,143

 
10,515

 
597

 
17,255

 
(2,113
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Mercer Well Services
 
Cleburne
 
TX
 

 
262

 
369

 

 
631

 
(66
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2008
Merrill Lynch
 
Hopewell
 
NJ
 
74,250

 
17,619

 
108,349

 
(12,141
)
 
113,827

 
(9,953
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Metro PCS
 
Richardson
 
TX
 
7,655

 
1,292

 
19,606

 
769

 
21,667

 
(4,180
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1986
Mezcal Mexican Restaurant
 
Grafton
 
OH
 

 
64

 
191

 

 
255

 
(51
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Michael's
 
Lancaster
 
CA
 

 
7,744

 
33,872

 

 
41,616

 
(122
)
 
11/20/2017
 
1998

F-152



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Michael's
 
Lafayette
 
LA
 

 
1,831

 
3,631

 

 
5,462

 
(834
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Michelin
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
1,120

 
7,763

 
15

 
8,898

 
(1,953
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2011
Millenium Chem
 
Glen Burnie
 
MD
 

 
2,127

 
23,198

 
(3,894
)
 
21,431

 
(1,778
)
 
2/21/2014
 
1984
Miraca Life Sciences
 
Irving
 
TX
 

 
3,237

 
37,297

 
341

 
40,875

 
(7,129
)
 
4/28/2014
 
1997
Mister Car Wash
 
Florence
 
AL
 

 
198

 
1,376

 

 
1,574

 
(8
)
 
10/17/2017
 
2008
Mister Car Wash
 
Florence
 
AL
 

 
404

 
1,605

 

 
2,009

 
(12
)
 
10/17/2017
 
2016
Mister Car Wash
 
Muscle Shoals
 
AL
 

 
378

 
1,445

 

 
1,823

 
(9
)
 
10/17/2017
 
2008
Mister Car Wash
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
662

 
777

 

 
1,439

 
(14
)
 
5/16/2017
 
2002
Mister Car Wash
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
779

 
1,600

 

 
2,379

 
(32
)
 
4/18/2017
 
2001
Mister Car Wash
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
721

 
996

 

 
1,717

 
(17
)
 
5/16/2017
 
1984
Mister Car Wash
 
Grand Rapids
 
MI
 

 
458

 
938

 

 
1,396

 
(17
)
 
5/16/2017
 
1961
Mister Car Wash
 
Kentwood
 
MI
 

 
238

 
877

 

 
1,115

 
(16
)
 
5/16/2017
 
1979
Monro Muffler
 
Lewiston
 
ME
 

 
279

 
1,115

 

 
1,394

 
(299
)
 
5/10/2013
 
1976
Monro Muffler
 
Waukesha
 
WI
 

 
228

 
684

 

 
912

 
(177
)
 
7/23/2013
 
2002
Monterey's Tex Mex
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
135

 
406

 
(326
)
 
215

 
(13
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
MotoMart
 
St. Charles
 
MO
 

 
1,085

 
1,980

 

 
3,065

 
(473
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
MS Energy Service
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
1,165

 
948

 

 
2,113

 
(167
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2012
My Dentist
 
Chickasha
 
OK
 

 
100

 
186

 

 
286

 
(49
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
N/A - Billboard
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
33

 

 

 
33

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
N/A - Billboard
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
63

 

 

 
63

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
N/A - Billboard
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
73

 

 

 
73

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
N/A - Billboard
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
90

 

 

 
90

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1995
N/A - Parking Lot
 
Kingston
 
PA
 

 
29

 

 

 
29

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
National Tire & Battery
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
756

 
924

 

 
1,680

 
(275
)
 
10/31/2012
 
1998
National Tire & Battery
 
Nashville
 
TN
 
799

 
603

 
1,373

 

 
1,976

 
(268
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1978
Natural Grocers
 
Gilbert
 
AZ
 

 
2,113

 
3,211

 

 
5,324

 
(78
)
 
3/1/2017
 
2016
Natural Grocers
 
Gilbert
 
AZ
 

 
2,100

 
3,231

 

 
5,331

 
(79
)
 
3/1/2017
 
2016
Natural Grocers
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
1,571

 
3,637

 

 
5,208

 
(101
)
 
3/1/2017
 
2016
Natural Grocers
 
Salem
 
OR
 

 
1,339

 
3,886

 

 
5,225

 
(808
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Nestle Holdings
 
Breinigsville
 
PA
 

 
7,381

 
66,948

 

 
74,329

 
(16,846
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1994
Northern Tool & Equipment
 
Ocala
 
FL
 
1,598

 
1,693

 
2,727

 

 
4,420

 
(567
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Northrop Grumman
 
El Segundo
 
CA
 

 
15,935

 
67,908

 

 
83,843

 
(11,640
)
 
6/27/2014
 
1972

F-153



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
NTT Data
 
Lincoln
 
NE
 

 
2,812

 
25,566

 

 
28,378

 
(4,640
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
NTW
 
Morrow
 
GA
 

 
397

 
1,586

 

 
1,983

 
(491
)
 
6/5/2012
 
1992
O'Charley's
 
Dalton
 
GA
 

 
406

 
1,817

 

 
2,223

 
(473
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
O'Charley's
 
Tucker
 
GA
 

 
1,037

 
866

 

 
1,903

 
(225
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Old Country Buffet
 
Burbank
 
CA
 

 
246

 
1,309

 
(1,094
)
 
461

 
(71
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2001
Old Country Buffet
 
Fresno
 
CA
 

 
326

 
1,306

 
(1,282
)
 
350

 
(57
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2003
Olive Garden
 
Flagstaff
 
AZ
 

 
875

 
455

 

 
1,330

 
(62
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Olive Garden
 
Altamonte Springs
 
FL
 

 
699

 
4,023

 

 
4,722

 
(432
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2006
Olive Garden
 
Leesburg
 
FL
 

 
692

 
1,837

 

 
2,529

 
(185
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Olive Garden
 
Port Charlotte
 
FL
 

 
1,454

 
4,156

 

 
5,610

 
(385
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Olive Garden
 
Salisbury
 
MD
 

 
1,171

 
3,144

 

 
4,315

 
(301
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Olive Garden
 
Cary
 
NC
 

 
1,545

 
6,603

 

 
8,148

 
(598
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Olive Garden
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
819

 
4,053

 

 
4,872

 
(378
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Olive Garden
 
Langhorne
 
PA
 

 
970

 
3,717

 

 
4,687

 
(346
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Olive Garden
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
1,560

 
1,422

 

 
2,982

 
(181
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Olive Garden
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
973

 
2,902

 

 
3,875

 
(279
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Olive Garden
 
Chesapeake
 
VA
 

 
1,382

 
2,252

 

 
3,634

 
(224
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Olive Garden
 
Manassas
 
VA
 

 
1,965

 
2,585

 

 
4,550

 
(252
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Olive Garden
 
Silverdale
 
WA
 

 
1,752

 
2,015

 

 
3,767

 
(204
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Olive Garden
 
Morgantown
 
WV
 

 
1,765

 
2,199

 

 
3,964

 
(281
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2006
Omnipoint Communication
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 
49,838

 
5,770

 
64,073

 
2,108

 
71,951

 
(14,607
)
 
5/9/2013
 
2000
On the Border
 
Rogers
 
AR
 
950

 
655

 
1,500

 

 
2,155

 
(368
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
On the Border
 
Mesa
 
AZ
 
1,804

 
2,090

 
1,534

 

 
3,624

 
(378
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
On the Border
 
Peoria
 
AZ
 
1,562

 
2,129

 
1,352

 

 
3,481

 
(305
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
On the Border
 
Alpharetta
 
GA
 

 
1,771

 
1,842

 

 
3,613

 
(450
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
On the Border
 
Buford
 
GA
 

 
1,786

 
1,506

 

 
3,292

 
(374
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
On the Border
 
Naperville
 
IL
 

 
2,549

 
1,414

 

 
3,963

 
(409
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
On the Border
 
West Springfield
 
MA
 
2,000

 
413

 
4,173

 

 
4,586

 
(967
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
On the Border
 
Auburn Hills
 
MI
 

 
1,355

 
2,745

 

 
4,100

 
(623
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
On the Border
 
Novi
 
MI
 

 
444

 
3,176

 

 
3,620

 
(700
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
On the Border
 
Kansas City
 
MO
 
1,454

 
1,743

 
1,039

 

 
2,782

 
(313
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
On the Border
 
Lees Summit
 
MO
 
1,200

 
1,647

 
1,008

 

 
2,655

 
(297
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002

F-154



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
On the Border
 
Concord Mills
 
NC
 

 
1,903

 
1,456

 

 
3,359

 
(398
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
On the Border
 
Mount Laurel
 
NJ
 
713

 
1,446

 
1,938

 

 
3,384

 
(473
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
On the Border
 
W. Windsor
 
NJ
 
2,433

 
1,489

 
1,703

 

 
3,192

 
(549
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
On the Border
 
Columbus
 
OH
 
1,925

 
1,594

 
1,558

 

 
3,152

 
(442
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
On the Border
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
859

 
2,310

 

 
3,169

 
(572
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
On the Border
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
740

 
2,956

 

 
3,696

 
(714
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
On the Border
 
Burleson
 
TX
 

 
891

 
2,844

 

 
3,735

 
(680
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
On the Border
 
College Station
 
TX
 

 
2,218

 
1,471

 

 
3,689

 
(358
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
On the Border
 
Denton
 
TX
 

 
1,419

 
2,012

 

 
3,431

 
(490
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
On the Border
 
Desoto
 
TX
 

 
751

 
3,207

 

 
3,958

 
(734
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
On the Border
 
Ft. Worth
 
TX
 

 
1,222

 
2,991

 

 
4,213

 
(693
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
On the Border
 
Garland
 
TX
 

 
1,065

 
1,692

 

 
2,757

 
(403
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
On the Border
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
375

 
3,679

 

 
4,054

 
(818
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
On the Border
 
Rockwall
 
TX
 

 
693

 
3,244

 

 
3,937

 
(700
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
On the Border
 
Woodbridge
 
VA
 

 
1,799

 
899

 

 
2,698

 
(441
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Oneonta
 
AL
 

 
81

 
460

 

 
541

 
(134
)
 
8/2/2012
 
2000
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
573

 
794

 

 
1,367

 
(167
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Breaux Bridge
 
LA
 

 
139

 
738

 

 
877

 
(157
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Central
 
LA
 

 
104

 
915

 

 
1,019

 
(188
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
La Place
 
LA
 

 
342

 
819

 

 
1,161

 
(173
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
New Roads
 
LA
 

 
175

 
737

 

 
912

 
(158
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Ravenna
 
OH
 

 
144

 
1,137

 

 
1,281

 
(230
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Willard
 
OH
 

 
137

 
877

 

 
1,014

 
(173
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Highlands
 
TX
 
485

 
281

 
813

 

 
1,094

 
(153
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Houston
 
TX
 
560

 
340

 
895

 

 
1,235

 
(169
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 
703

 
439

 
1,030

 

 
1,469

 
(200
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Christiansburg
 
VA
 
646

 
562

 
793

 

 
1,355

 
(155
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Laramie
 
WY
 

 
144

 
1,297

 

 
1,441

 
(372
)
 
10/12/2012
 
1999
Outback Steakhouse
 
Fort Smith
 
AR
 

 
841

 
1,996

 

 
2,837

 
(492
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Outback Steakhouse
 
Centennial
 
CO
 

 
1,378

 
1,397

 

 
2,775

 
(351
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Outback Steakhouse
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
770

 
2,261

 

 
3,031

 
(497
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Outback Steakhouse
 
Sebring
 
FL
 

 
981

 
1,695

 

 
2,676

 
(421
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001

F-155



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Outback Steakhouse
 
Fort Wayne
 
IN
 

 
733

 
984

 

 
1,717

 
(406
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Outback Steakhouse
 
Lexington
 
KY
 

 
1,077

 
2,139

 

 
3,216

 
(511
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Outback Steakhouse
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
742

 
1,272

 

 
2,014

 
(301
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Outback Steakhouse
 
Southgate
 
MI
 

 
787

 
2,742

 

 
3,529

 
(620
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Outback Steakhouse
 
Lees Summit
 
MO
 

 
901

 
620

 

 
1,521

 
(169
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Outback Steakhouse
 
Garner
 
NC
 

 
1,088

 
1,817

 

 
2,905

 
(439
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Outback Steakhouse
 
Las Cruces
 
NM
 

 
536

 
1,549

 

 
2,085

 
(357
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Outback Steakhouse
 
Boardman Township
 
OH
 

 
575

 
2,742

 

 
3,317

 
(633
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995

F-156



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Outback Steakhouse
 
Independence
 
OH
 

 
901

 
2,268

 

 
3,169

 
(434
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Outback Steakhouse
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
1,370

 
932

 

 
2,302

 
(329
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Outback Steakhouse
 
Conroe
 
TX
 

 
959

 
2,063

 

 
3,022

 
(440
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Outback Steakhouse
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
964

 
2,321

 

 
3,285

 
(497
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Outback Steakhouse
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 

 
835

 
443

 

 
1,278

 
(108
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Outback Steakhouse
 
Colonial Heights
 
VA
 

 
1,297

 
746

 

 
2,043

 
(439
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Outback Steakhouse
 
Newport News
 
VA
 

 
600

 
1,356

 

 
1,956

 
(533
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Outback Steakhouse
 
Winchester
 
VA
 

 
704

 
1,310

 

 
2,014

 
(565
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Owens & Minor
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
755

 
6,077

 
(4
)
 
6,828

 
(989
)
 
9/30/2014
 
2014
Owens Corning
 
Newark
 
OH
 

 
725

 
13,013

 

 
13,738

 
(2,292
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Owens Corning
 
Wichita Falls
 
TX
 

 
231

 
847

 

 
1,078

 
(149
)
 
6/12/2014
 
1972
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
526

 
1,228

 

 
1,754

 
(346
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1998
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
1,332

 
1,332

 

 
2,664

 
(376
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2004
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
1,667

 
417

 

 
2,084

 
(118
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1982
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
1,191

 
1,787

 

 
2,978

 
(504
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1987
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Charlotte
 
NC
 

 
1,070

 
1,308

 

 
2,378

 
(369
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1997
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Conover
 
NC
 

 
1,144

 
936

 

 
2,080

 
(264
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1998
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Cornelius
 
NC
 

 
1,847

 
2,258

 

 
4,105

 
(637
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1999
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Lincolnton
 
NC
 

 
1,766

 
2,159

 

 
3,925

 
(609
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2000
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Matthews
 
NC
 

 
980

 
1,819

 

 
2,799

 
(513
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1987
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Thomasville
 
NC
 

 
1,175

 
1,436

 

 
2,611

 
(405
)
 
12/31/2012
 
2000
Pantry Gas & Convenience
 
Fort Mill
 
SC
 

 
1,311

 
1,967

 

 
3,278

 
(555
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1988
Pearson Education
 
Lawrence
 
KS
 

 
2,548

 
18,057

 
(3,435
)
 
17,170

 
(1,216
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1997
Penske
 
Bedford
 
OH
 

 
183

 

 

 
183

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Peraton
 
Herndon
 
VA
 

 
1,384

 
53,584

 
(20,560
)
 
34,408

 

 
11/5/2013
 
1999
Petco
 
Lake Charles
 
LA
 
2,145

 
690

 
4,072

 

 
4,762

 
(766
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Petco
 
Dardenne Prairie
 
MO
 

 
806

 
3,024

 

 
3,830

 
(556
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Petsmart
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 
51,250

 
7,308

 
97,510

 
36

 
104,854

 
(15,598
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Petsmart
 
Merced
 
CA
 

 
1,729

 
4,194

 

 
5,923

 
(785
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Petsmart
 
Redding
 
CA
 

 
1,312

 
4,133

 
207

 
5,652

 
(845
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
Petsmart
 
Westlake Village
 
CA
 

 
3,406

 
5,017

 

 
8,423

 
(904
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Petsmart
 
Boca Raton
 
FL
 

 
3,514

 
4,912

 

 
8,426

 
(953
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001

F-157



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Petsmart
 
Lake Mary
 
FL
 

 
2,430

 
2,556

 

 
4,986

 
(502
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Petsmart
 
Plantation
 
FL
 

 
965

 
5,302

 

 
6,267

 
(979
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Petsmart
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
1,468

 
1,387

 

 
2,855

 
(282
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Petsmart
 
Evanston
 
IL
 

 
1,120

 
6,007

 

 
7,127

 
(1,080
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Petsmart
 
Braintree
 
MA
 

 
2,805

 
8,398

 

 
11,203

 
(1,470
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Petsmart
 
Oxon Hill
 
MD
 

 
1,722

 
4,389

 

 
6,111

 
(815
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Petsmart
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
606

 
3,839

 

 
4,445

 
(710
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
PetSmart
 
Sedalia
 
MO
 

 
273

 
3,645

 

 
3,918

 
(14
)
 
11/1/2017
 
2017
Petsmart
 
Parma
 
OH
 

 
1,288

 
3,527

 

 
4,815

 
(650
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Petsmart
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
470

 
6,089

 

 
6,559

 
(1,053
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Petsmart
 
Southlake
 
TX
 

 
1,063

 
7,093

 

 
8,156

 
(1,253
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
PetSmart
 
Oak Creek
 
WI
 

 
906

 
3,578

 

 
4,484

 
(44
)
 
8/25/2017
 
2016
Physicians Dialysis
 
Lawrenceville
 
NJ
 

 
633

 
2,757

 

 
3,390

 
(467
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Physicians Immediate Care
 
Aurora
 
IL
 

 
1,043

 
1,346

 

 
2,389

 
(299
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Physicians Immediate Care
 
Glendale Heights
 
IL
 

 
487

 
2,256

 

 
2,743

 
(475
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Physicians Immediate Care
 
New Lenox
 
IL
 

 
535

 
1,884

 

 
2,419

 
(405
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Physicians Immediate Care
 
Plainfield
 
IL
 

 
590

 
1,747

 

 
2,337

 
(372
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Physicians Immediate Care
 
Mishawaka
 
IN
 

 
252

 
1,351

 

 
1,603

 
(314
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Pier 1 Imports
 
Victoria
 
TX
 

 
457

 
1,767

 

 
2,224

 
(375
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Pilot Flying J
 
Carnesville
 
GA
 

 
1,867

 
7,466

 

 
9,333

 
(2,674
)
 
1/31/2013
 
2000
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Page
 
AZ
 

 
66

 
263

 

 
329

 
(62
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Cooper City
 
FL
 

 
320

 
466

 

 
786

 
(119
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Marathon
 
FL
 

 
530

 
187

 

 
717

 
(48
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Ashburn
 
GA
 

 
102

 
233

 
(39
)
 
296

 
(31
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1988
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Eatonton
 
GA
 

 
353

 
353

 

 
706

 
(83
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Greensboro
 
GA
 

 
569

 
465

 

 
1,034

 
(109
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Jackson
 
GA
 

 
673

 
735

 

 
1,408

 
(185
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
539

 
499

 

 
1,038

 
(126
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Salisbury
 
MD
 

 
245

 
734

 

 
979

 
(173
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Dearborn
 
MI
 

 
284

 
528

 

 
812

 
(124
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Bozeman
 
MT
 

 
150

 
343

 

 
493

 
(88
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Glasgow
 
MT
 

 
120

 
217

 

 
337

 
(55
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995

F-158



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Livingston
 
MT
 

 
130

 
245

 

 
375

 
(63
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
East Syracuse
 
NY
 

 
137

 
185

 

 
322

 
(47
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Nedrow
 
NY
 

 
55

 
80

 

 
135

 
(20
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Bowling Green
 
OH
 

 
141

 
262

 

 
403

 
(62
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
87

 
175

 

 
262

 
(44
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Defiance
 
OH
 

 
114

 
197

 

 
311

 
(50
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Delaware
 
OH
 

 
270

 
721

 

 
991

 
(181
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Middleburg Hts
 
OH
 

 
128

 
156

 

 
284

 
(37
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
North Olmsted
 
OH
 

 
122

 
153

 

 
275

 
(38
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Norwalk
 
OH
 

 
77

 
115

 

 
192

 
(27
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Sandusky
 
OH
 

 
140

 
171

 

 
311

 
(40
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Strongsville
 
OH
 

 
74

 
108

 

 
182

 
(27
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Toledo
 
OH
 

 
58

 
173

 

 
231

 
(43
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Shamokin
 
PA
 

 
54

 
217

 

 
271

 
(51
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Batesburg
 
SC
 

 
261

 
484

 

 
745

 
(114
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Bishopville
 
SC
 

 
365

 
365

 

 
730

 
(86
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Cheraw
 
SC
 

 
415

 
507

 

 
922

 
(119
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
881

 
588

 

 
1,469

 
(138
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Edgefield
 
SC
 

 
221

 
410

 

 
631

 
(97
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Laurens
 
SC
 

 
454

 
371

 

 
825

 
(87
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Pageland
 
SC
 

 
344

 
420

 

 
764

 
(99
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Saluda
 
SC
 

 
346

 
346

 

 
692

 
(81
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Santee
 
SC
 

 
371

 
248

 

 
619

 
(58
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1972
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
St. George
 
SC
 

 
367

 
245

 

 
612

 
(58
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
West Columbia
 
SC
 

 
507

 
415

 

 
922

 
(97
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Box Elder
 
SD
 

 
68

 
217

 

 
285

 
(55
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
300

 
546

 

 
846

 
(140
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
339

 
1,016

 

 
1,355

 
(239
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
254

 
1,015

 

 
1,269

 
(239
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Crystal City
 
TX
 

 
148

 
453

 

 
601

 
(114
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1981
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Fort Stockton
 
TX
 

 
252

 
1,007

 

 
1,259

 
(237
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2008
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
414

 
506

 

 
920

 
(119
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1975

F-159



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
506

 
619

 

 
1,125

 
(145
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Monahans
 
TX
 

 
361

 
671

 

 
1,032

 
(158
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
456

 
847

 

 
1,303

 
(199
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
588

 
882

 

 
1,470

 
(207
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1972
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
572

 
572

 

 
1,144

 
(135
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
627

 
766

 

 
1,393

 
(180
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
457

 
685

 

 
1,142

 
(161
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Pecos
 
TX
 

 
387

 
719

 

 
1,106

 
(169
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1974
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
214

 
641

 
(183
)
 
672

 
(41
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
268

 
624

 
(266
)
 
626

 
(36
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Stamford
 
TX
 

 
38

 
115

 

 
153

 
(27
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Cedar City
 
UT
 

 
52

 
361

 

 
413

 
(91
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Kanab
 
UT
 

 
52

 
210

 

 
262

 
(49
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Ashland
 
VA
 

 
589

 
1,093

 

 
1,682

 
(257
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Bedford
 
VA
 

 
548

 
670

 

 
1,218

 
(158
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Chester
 
VA
 

 
473

 
1,104

 

 
1,577

 
(260
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Christiansburg
 
VA
 

 
494

 
918

 

 
1,412

 
(216
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Clifton Forge
 
VA
 

 
287

 
861

 

 
1,148

 
(202
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Colonial Heights
 
VA
 

 
311

 
311

 

 
622

 
(73
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Hampton
 
VA
 

 
641

 
345

 

 
986

 
(81
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Hopewell
 
VA
 

 
707

 
864

 

 
1,571

 
(203
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Newport News
 
VA
 

 
394

 
591

 

 
985

 
(139
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1969
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Newport News
 
VA
 

 
394

 
591

 

 
985

 
(139
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1970
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Petersburg
 
VA
 

 
378

 
701

 

 
1,079

 
(165
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Richmond
 
VA
 

 
666

 
814

 

 
1,480

 
(191
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Richmond
 
VA
 

 
311

 
311

 

 
622

 
(73
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Abbotsford
 
WI
 

 
159

 
195

 

 
354

 
(46
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Antigo
 
WI
 

 
45

 
252

 
100

 
397

 
(71
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Clintonville
 
WI
 

 
208

 
69

 

 
277

 
(16
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Eagle River
 
WI
 

 
28

 
159

 

 
187

 
(37
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Hayward
 
WI
 

 
51

 
205

 

 
256

 
(48
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Merrill
 
WI
 

 
83

 
531

 
(100
)
 
514

 
(93
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980

F-160



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Neillsville
 
WI
 

 
35

 
106

 

 
141

 
(25
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Plover
 
WI
 

 
85

 
199

 
100

 
384

 
(57
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Stevens Point
 
WI
 

 
130

 
390

 
100

 
620

 
(106
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Tomahawk
 
WI
 

 
35

 
81

 

 
116

 
(19
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Waupaca
 
WI
 

 
61

 
91

 
35

 
187

 
(29
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Beckley
 
WV
 

 
160

 
131

 

 
291

 
(31
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet
 
Huntington
 
WV
 

 
190

 
4

 

 
194

 
(1
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
PLS Check Cashers
 
Mesa
 
AZ
 

 
187

 
759

 

 
946

 
(208
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
PLS Check Cashers
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
288

 
677

 

 
965

 
(175
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
PLS Check Cashers
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
264

 
800

 

 
1,064

 
(227
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
PLS Check Cashers
 
Compton
 
CA
 

 
475

 
107

 

 
582

 
(70
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
PLS Check Cashers
 
Calumet Park
 
IL
 

 
306

 
1,003

 

 
1,309

 
(269
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
PLS Check Cashers
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
451

 
127

 

 
578

 
(85
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
PLS Check Cashers
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
197

 
1,356

 

 
1,553

 
(291
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1983
PLS Check Cashers
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
169

 
1,180

 

 
1,349

 
(256
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
PLS Check Cashers
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 
187

 
1,473

 

 
1,660

 
(306
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
PLS Check Cashers
 
Grand Prairie
 
TX
 

 
385

 
1,056

 

 
1,441

 
(227
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1971
PLS Check Cashers
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
158

 
1,293

 

 
1,451

 
(255
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
PLS Check Cashers
 
Mesquite
 
TX
 

 
261

 
1,388

 

 
1,649

 
(321
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
PLS Check Cashers
 
Kenosha
 
WI
 

 
190

 
693

 

 
883

 
(165
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
PNC Bank
 
Woodbury
 
NJ
 

 
465

 
2,633

 

 
3,098

 
(594
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1971
PNC Bank
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
195

 
538

 

 
733

 
(123
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1979
Pollo Tropical
 
Davie
 
FL
 

 
280

 
1,490

 

 
1,770

 
(368
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pollo Tropical
 
Fort Lauderdale
 
FL
 

 
190

 
1,242

 

 
1,432

 
(307
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Pollo Tropical
 
Lake Worth
 
FL
 

 
280

 
1,182

 

 
1,462

 
(292
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Ponderosa
 
Scottsburg
 
IN
 

 
430

 
141

 

 
571

 
(37
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Popeyes
 
Brandon
 
FL
 

 
776

 
961

 

 
1,737

 
(242
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Popeyes
 
Carol City
 
FL
 

 
423

 
1,090

 

 
1,513

 
(240
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1979
Popeyes
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
781

 
955

 

 
1,736

 
(225
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1955
Popeyes
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
830

 
830

 

 
1,660

 
(195
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Popeyes
 
Miami
 
FL
 

 
220

 
330

 

 
550

 
(78
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1962
Popeyes
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
782

 
955

 

 
1,737

 
(225
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2004

F-161



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Popeyes
 
Pensacola
 
FL
 

 
301

 
673

 

 
974

 
(149
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2001
Popeyes
 
Starke
 
FL
 

 
380

 

 
614

 
994

 
(20
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Popeyes
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
216

 
508

 

 
724

 
(112
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1981
Popeyes
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
673

 
1,065

 

 
1,738

 
(268
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Popeyes
 
Winter Haven
 
FL
 

 
484

 
1,001

 

 
1,485

 
(252
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Popeyes
 
Thomasville
 
GA
 

 
110

 
705

 

 
815

 
(174
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Popeyes
 
Valdosta
 
GA
 

 
240

 
599

 

 
839

 
(148
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Popeyes
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
323

 
394

 

 
717

 
(93
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Popeyes
 
Bayou Vista
 
LA
 

 
375

 
709

 

 
1,084

 
(179
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Popeyes
 
Eunice
 
LA
 

 
382

 
891

 

 
1,273

 
(209
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Popeyes
 
Franklin
 
LA
 

 
283

 
538

 

 
821

 
(135
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Popeyes
 
Lafayette
 
LA
 

 
434

 
899

 

 
1,333

 
(226
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Popeyes
 
Lafayette
 
LA
 

 
473

 
901

 

 
1,374

 
(227
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1996
Popeyes
 
Marksville
 
LA
 

 
487

 
1,129

 

 
1,616

 
(284
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Popeyes
 
Ferguson
 
MO
 

 
128

 
383

 

 
511

 
(90
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Popeyes
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
248

 
460

 

 
708

 
(116
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1959
Popeyes
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
288

 
431

 

 
719

 
(101
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Popeyes
 
Greenville
 
MS
 

 
513

 
977

 

 
1,490

 
(246
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Popeyes
 
Grenada
 
MS
 

 
77

 
458

 

 
535

 
(101
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2007
Popeyes
 
Omaha
 
NE
 

 
343

 
515

 

 
858

 
(121
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Popeyes
 
Omaha
 
NE
 

 
264

 
615

 

 
879

 
(145
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Popeyes
 
Eatontown
 
NJ
 

 
651

 
796

 

 
1,447

 
(187
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Popeyes
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
1,216

 
533

 

 
1,749

 
(134
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1996
Popeyes
 
Channelview
 
TX
 

 
220

 
401

 

 
621

 
(99
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Popeyes
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
190

 
452

 

 
642

 
(112
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Popeyes
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
295

 
241

 

 
536

 
(57
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Popeyes
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
111

 
166

 

 
277

 
(39
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Popeyes
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
278

 
227

 

 
505

 
(53
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Popeyes
 
Nederland
 
TX
 

 
445

 
668

 

 
1,113

 
(157
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Popeyes
 
Orange
 
TX
 

 
456

 
847

 

 
1,303

 
(199
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Popeyes
 
Port Arthur
 
TX
 

 
408

 
589

 

 
997

 
(148
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Popeyes
 
Newport News
 
VA
 

 
381

 
217

 

 
598

 
(55
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2002

F-162



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Popeyes
 
Portsmouth
 
VA
 

 
369

 
230

 

 
599

 
(58
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2002
Price Rite
 
Rochester
 
NY
 
3,080

 
569

 
3,594

 

 
4,163

 
(1,190
)
 
9/27/2012
 
1965

F-163



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Publix
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 

 
934

 
6,377

 
165

 
7,476

 
(1,341
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Pulte Mortgage
 
Englewood
 
CO
 

 
2,563

 
22,026

 

 
24,589

 
(4,568
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2009
Qdoba Mexican Grill
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
110

 
990

 

 
1,100

 
(334
)
 
3/29/2013
 
2006
Qdoba Mexican Grill
 
Grand Blanc
 
MI
 

 
165

 
935

 

 
1,100

 
(315
)
 
3/29/2013
 
2006
Quincy's Family Steakhouse
 
Monroe
 
NC
 

 
560

 
458

 
(245
)
 
773

 
(54
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
RaceTrac
 
Bessemer
 
AL
 

 
761

 
2,624

 

 
3,385

 
(556
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
RaceTrac
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
580

 
1,317

 

 
1,897

 
(279
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
RaceTrac
 
Bellview
 
FL
 

 
684

 
3,831

 

 
4,515

 
(844
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
RaceTrac
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
1,065

 
2,863

 

 
3,928

 
(680
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
RaceTrac
 
Leesburg
 
FL
 

 
1,188

 
2,711

 

 
3,899

 
(653
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
RaceTrac
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
1,025

 
1,511

 

 
2,536

 
(339
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
RaceTrac
 
Denton
 
TX
 

 
1,030

 
2,645

 

 
3,675

 
(534
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
RaceTrac
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
1,209

 
1,204

 

 
2,413

 
(250
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
RaceTrac
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
1,203

 
1,509

 

 
2,712

 
(314
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Rally's
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
210

 
1,514

 

 
1,724

 
(374
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Rally's
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
1,168

 

 

 
1,168

 

 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Rally's
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
1,168

 

 

 
1,168

 

 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Rally's
 
Kokomo
 
IN
 

 
290

 
548

 

 
838

 
(135
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Rally's
 
Muncie
 
IN
 

 
310

 
1,196

 

 
1,506

 
(295
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Rally's
 
Harvey
 
LA
 

 
420

 
870

 

 
1,290

 
(215
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Rally's
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 

 
450

 
1,691

 

 
2,141

 
(418
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Rally's
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 

 
220

 
1,018

 

 
1,238

 
(251
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Rally's
 
Hamtramck
 
MI
 

 
230

 
1,020

 

 
1,250

 
(252
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 

 

 
741

 

 
741

 
(136
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Decatur
 
AL
 

 
1,100

 
686

 

 
1,786

 
(147
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Dothan
 
AL
 

 
726

 
1,244

 

 
1,970

 
(168
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1979
Red Lobster
 
Florence
 
AL
 

 
974

 
908

 

 
1,882

 
(167
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 

 
1,098

 
2,330

 

 
3,428

 
(249
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Montgomery
 
AL
 

 
1,034

 
1,413

 

 
2,447

 
(187
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
Vestavia Hills
 
AL
 

 
1,257

 
1,417

 

 
2,674

 
(158
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Fort Smith
 
AR
 

 
1,643

 
1,228

 

 
2,871

 
(176
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Hot Springs
 
AR
 

 
928

 
1,593

 

 
2,521

 
(235
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Red Lobster
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
1,942

 
725

 

 
2,667

 
(118
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977

F-164



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
North Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
999

 
1,906

 

 
2,905

 
(229
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Pine Bluff
 
AR
 

 
226

 
1,194

 

 
1,420

 
(197
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
1,398

 
2,069

 

 
3,467

 
(272
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2008
Red Lobster
 
Chandler
 
AZ
 

 

 
252

 

 
252

 
(128
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2000
Red Lobster
 
Flagstaff
 
AZ
 

 
891

 
514

 

 
1,405

 
(141
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Gilbert
 
AZ
 

 

 
460

 

 
460

 
(164
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2007
Red Lobster
 
Surprise
 
AZ
 

 

 
565

 

 
565

 
(185
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 

 
676

 

 
676

 
(185
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2009
Red Lobster
 
Bakersfield
 
CA
 

 

 
731

 

 
731

 
(211
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Chico
 
CA
 

 
717

 
1,146

 

 
1,863

 
(187
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Red Lobster
 
Chula Vista
 
CA
 

 

 
1,671

 

 
1,671

 
(280
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1988
Red Lobster
 
Fremont
 
CA
 

 
1,638

 
564

 

 
2,202

 
(101
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1984
Red Lobster
 
Inglewood
 
CA
 

 

 
2,211

 

 
2,211

 
(418
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2007
Red Lobster
 
Oceanside
 
CA
 

 

 
1,529

 

 
1,529

 
(268
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2010
Red Lobster
 
Ontario
 
CA
 

 
1,304

 
2,238

 

 
3,542

 
(267
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Palm Desert
 
CA
 

 
1,132

 
1,321

 

 
2,453

 
(215
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2012
Red Lobster
 
Riverside
 
CA
 

 
914

 
2,459

 

 
3,373

 
(263
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1988
Red Lobster
 
San Bruno
 
CA
 

 

 
1,611

 

 
1,611

 
(372
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
San Diego
 
CA
 

 

 
1,113

 

 
1,113

 
(387
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1988
Red Lobster
 
Torrance
 
CA
 

 
1,850

 
1,579

 

 
3,429

 
(185
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1988
Red Lobster
 
Valencia
 
CA
 

 

 
841

 

 
841

 
(302
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1988
Red Lobster
 
Colorado Springs
 
CO
 

 

 
1,512

 

 
1,512

 
(267
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2004
Red Lobster
 
Bridgeport
 
CT
 

 

 
323

 

 
323

 
(133
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Danbury
 
CT
 

 

 
159

 

 
159

 
(96
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Newark
 
DE
 

 

 
1,515

 

 
1,515

 
(333
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2006
Red Lobster
 
Talleyville
 
DE
 

 
1,201

 
1,877

 

 
3,078

 
(241
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Altamonte Springs
 
FL
 

 
1,212

 
1,674

 

 
2,886

 
(212
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1986
Red Lobster
 
Boynton Beach
 
FL
 

 

 
1,631

 

 
1,631

 
(320
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2008
Red Lobster
 
Fort Pierce
 
FL
 

 
618

 
1,491

 

 
2,109

 
(220
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Hollywood
 
FL
 

 

 
2,282

 

 
2,282

 
(463
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Kissimmee
 
FL
 

 

 
1,364

 

 
1,364

 
(341
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2002
Red Lobster
 
Leesburg
 
FL
 

 
721

 
1,262

 

 
1,983

 
(190
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Miami
 
FL
 

 

 
1,062

 

 
1,062

 
(310
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003

F-165



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 

 
1,188

 

 
1,188

 
(331
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1989
Red Lobster
 
Panama City
 
FL
 

 

 
1,515

 

 
1,515

 
(296
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Pembroke Pines
 
FL
 

 
479

 
3,126

 

 
3,605

 
(346
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1987
Red Lobster
 
Plantation
 
FL
 

 
1,975

 
1,733

 

 
3,708

 
(229
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1989
Red Lobster
 
Port Charlotte
 
FL
 

 
1,476

 
1,516

 

 
2,992

 
(209
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Sebring
 
FL
 

 
1,003

 
1,487

 

 
2,490

 
(197
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Winter Haven
 
FL
 

 
1,055

 
2,217

 

 
3,272

 
(220
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Athens
 
GA
 

 
669

 
2,027

 

 
2,696

 
(206
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1971
Red Lobster
 
Austell
 
GA
 

 

 
1,092

 

 
1,092

 
(233
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2001
Red Lobster
 
Buford
 
GA
 

 
1,315

 
2,638

 

 
3,953

 
(317
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2000
Red Lobster
 
Cartersville
 
GA
 

 
594

 
1,386

 

 
1,980

 
(199
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
956

 
1,957

 

 
2,913

 
(256
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2005
Red Lobster
 
Conyers
 
GA
 

 
549

 
3,144

 

 
3,693

 
(361
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2000
Red Lobster
 
Dalton
 
GA
 

 
775

 
2,045

 

 
2,820

 
(243
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Decatur
 
GA
 

 
1,102

 
1,873

 

 
2,975

 
(200
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Douglasville
 
GA
 

 
1,356

 
1,161

 

 
2,517

 
(174
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Jonesboro
 
GA
 

 
1,049

 
1,678

 

 
2,727

 
(181
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Kennesaw
 
GA
 

 
1,382

 
1,802

 

 
3,184

 
(220
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1987
Red Lobster
 
Perry
 
GA
 

 
351

 
1,839

 

 
2,190

 
(244
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Rome
 
GA
 

 
961

 
911

 

 
1,872

 
(135
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1979
Red Lobster
 
Roswell
 
GA
 

 
2,358

 
354

 

 
2,712

 
(84
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Savannah
 
GA
 

 
475

 
2,236

 

 
2,711

 
(232
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1971
Red Lobster
 
Tucker
 
GA
 

 

 
1,718

 

 
1,718

 
(337
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Ames
 
IA
 

 
789

 
1,133

 

 
1,922

 
(188
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Cedar Rapids
 
IA
 

 

 
495

 

 
495

 
(190
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Davenport
 
IA
 

 
619

 
2,896

 

 
3,515

 
(301
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
West Des Moines
 
IA
 

 
1,033

 
2,358

 

 
3,391

 
(254
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Boise
 
ID
 

 

 
714

 

 
714

 
(203
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1988
Red Lobster
 
Pocatello
 
ID
 

 

 
773

 

 
773

 
(311
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Red Lobster
 
Alton
 
IL
 

 
1,251

 
1,854

 

 
3,105

 
(218
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
Aurora
 
IL
 

 
1,598

 
782

 

 
2,380

 
(116
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1979
Red Lobster
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
1,064

 
2,422

 

 
3,486

 
(260
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Danville
 
IL
 

 
253

 
1,580

 

 
1,833

 
(228
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991

F-166



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Fairview Heights
 
IL
 

 

 
1,806

 

 
1,806

 
(629
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Forsyth
 
IL
 

 

 
1,083

 

 
1,083

 
(252
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Gurnee
 
IL
 

 
1,735

 
2,286

 

 
4,021

 
(248
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Marion
 
IL
 

 
399

 
2,399

 

 
2,798

 
(293
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Matteson
 
IL
 

 
962

 
2,212

 

 
3,174

 
(231
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Norridge
 
IL
 

 

 
929

 

 
929

 
(349
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1979
Red Lobster
 
Oak Lawn
 
IL
 

 
1,825

 
2,316

 

 
4,141

 
(241
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Orland Park
 
IL
 

 
1,046

 
2,489

 

 
3,535

 
(270
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Peru
 
IL
 

 
339

 
1,169

 

 
1,508

 
(183
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Schaumburg
 
IL
 

 

 
665

 

 
665

 
(175
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Springfield
 
IL
 

 
1,205

 
1,253

 

 
2,458

 
(169
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
West Dundee
 
IL
 

 
197

 
2,195

 

 
2,392

 
(242
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Anderson
 
IN
 

 
813

 
1,272

 

 
2,085

 
(167
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Avon
 
IN
 

 

 
864

 

 
864

 
(251
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2001
Red Lobster
 
Columbus
 
IN
 

 
615

 
1,435

 

 
2,050

 
(202
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Elkhart
 
IN
 

 
616

 
1,657

 

 
2,273

 
(301
)
 
9/19/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Evansville
 
IN
 

 
587

 
3,357

 

 
3,944

 
(342
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Fort Wayne
 
IN
 

 
567

 
2,985

 

 
3,552

 
(305
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Kokomo
 
IN
 

 
394

 
1,835

 

 
2,229

 
(213
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Mishawaka
 
IN
 

 
593

 
2,205

 

 
2,798

 
(238
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
Muncie
 
IN
 

 
627

 
1,427

 

 
2,054

 
(146
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Richmond
 
IN
 

 
371

 
1,416

 

 
1,787

 
(212
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Terre Haute
 
IN
 

 
1,066

 
2,640

 

 
3,706

 
(275
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Topeka
 
KS
 

 
754

 
2,211

 

 
2,965

 
(234
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Elizabethtown
 
KY
 

 
866

 
401

 

 
1,267

 
(138
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Lexington
 
KY
 

 

 
1,094

 

 
1,094

 
(246
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2011
Red Lobster
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
893

 
1,350

 

 
2,243

 
(197
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Owensboro
 
KY
 

 
815

 
1,485

 

 
2,300

 
(194
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
St. Matthews
 
KY
 

 
1,640

 
1,841

 

 
3,481

 
(200
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 

 
1,535

 

 
1,535

 
(303
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2011
Red Lobster
 
Monroe
 
LA
 

 
455

 
2,022

 

 
2,477

 
(254
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Annapolis
 
MD
 

 

 
644

 

 
644

 
(147
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1985
Red Lobster
 
Frederick
 
MD
 

 

 
319

 

 
319

 
(144
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1997

F-167



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Lanham
 
MD
 

 

 
455

 

 
455

 
(156
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Owings Mills
 
MD
 

 

 
229

 

 
229

 
(99
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1989
Red Lobster
 
Salisbury
 
MD
 

 
1,070

 
1,868

 

 
2,938

 
(249
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Suitland
 
MD
 

 
1,090

 
3,112

 

 
4,202

 
(310
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Battle Creek
 
MI
 

 
202

 
1,827

 

 
2,029

 
(217
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1979
Red Lobster
 
Dearborn Heights
 
MI
 

 
822

 
2,156

 

 
2,978

 
(237
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Flint
 
MI
 

 
505

 
2,266

 

 
2,771

 
(252
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Fort Gratiot
 
MI
 

 
250

 
1,611

 

 
1,861

 
(245
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2002
Red Lobster
 
Jackson
 
MI
 

 
235

 
2,174

 

 
2,409

 
(241
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Kentwood
 
MI
 

 
819

 
1,606

 

 
2,425

 
(188
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Lansing
 
MI
 

 

 
1,534

 

 
1,534

 
(303
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Livonia
 
MI
 

 
635

 
1,824

 

 
2,459

 
(232
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1987
Red Lobster
 
Mt. Pleasant
 
MI
 

 
508

 
1,346

 

 
1,854

 
(202
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Novi
 
MI
 

 
2,061

 
1,847

 

 
3,908

 
(229
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
Portage
 
MI
 

 
396

 
2,496

 

 
2,892

 
(264
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Saginaw
 
MI
 

 
335

 
1,961

 

 
2,296

 
(222
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Southgate
 
MI
 

 
611

 
2,531

 

 
3,142

 
(301
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Sterling Heights
 
MI
 

 
759

 
3,215

 

 
3,974

 
(349
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1985
Red Lobster
 
Traverse City
 
MI
 

 
1,036

 
1,121

 

 
2,157

 
(190
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Warren
 
MI
 

 
349

 
2,656

 

 
3,005

 
(279
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Mankato
 
MN
 

 
867

 
1,642

 

 
2,509

 
(231
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Rochester
 
MN
 

 

 
1,674

 

 
1,674

 
(284
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1987
Red Lobster
 
Roseville
 
MN
 

 
1,291

 
1,298

 

 
2,589

 
(143
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
St. Cloud
 
MN
 

 
760

 
2,770

 

 
3,530

 
(301
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Branson
 
MO
 

 
1,496

 
1,074

 

 
2,570

 
(131
)
 
7/30/2014
 
2000
Red Lobster
 
Bridgeton
 
MO
 

 
1,128

 
2,003

 

 
3,131

 
(223
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Cape Girardeau
 
MO
 

 
1,412

 
1,103

 

 
2,515

 
(186
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Red Lobster
 
Chesterfield
 
MO
 

 

 
1,762

 

 
1,762

 
(379
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Crestwood
 
MO
 

 
518

 
1,466

 

 
1,984

 
(171
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Jefferson City
 
MO
 

 
593

 
1,092

 

 
1,685

 
(153
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Springfield
 
MO
 

 

 
1,510

 

 
1,510

 
(456
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
St. Joseph
 
MO
 

 
1,023

 
1,002

 

 
2,025

 
(139
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1979

F-168



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
St. Peters
 
MO
 

 

 
1,543

 

 
1,543

 
(476
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
St.Louis
 
MO
 

 
1,387

 
2,662

 

 
4,049

 
(271
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Jackson
 
MS
 

 
1,128

 
2,851

 

 
3,979

 
(304
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Meridian
 
MS
 

 

 
872

 

 
872

 
(207
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Southaven
 
MS
 

 
668

 
2,640

 

 
3,308

 
(265
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Asheville
 
NC
 

 
544

 
2,865

 

 
3,409

 
(303
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Burlington
 
NC
 

 
1,208

 
403

 

 
1,611

 
(150
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2011
Red Lobster
 
Cary
 
NC
 

 
1,933

 
1,118

 

 
3,051

 
(182
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Concord
 
NC
 

 

 
1,506

 

 
1,506

 
(359
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2002
Red Lobster
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
675

 
2,908

 

 
3,583

 
(276
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1978
Red Lobster
 
Greensboro
 
NC
 

 
1,372

 
1,785

 

 
3,157

 
(200
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Raleigh
 
NC
 

 
946

 
2,183

 

 
3,129

 
(224
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
Bismarck
 
ND
 

 
831

 
3,321

 

 
4,152

 
(339
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Fargo
 
ND
 

 
888

 
2,933

 

 
3,821

 
(312
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Grand Forks
 
ND
 

 
876

 
1,694

 

 
2,570

 
(233
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Kearney
 
NE
 

 
678

 
1,109

 

 
1,787

 
(186
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Lincoln
 
NE
 

 

 
254

 

 
254

 
(90
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Cherry Hill
 
NJ
 

 

 
2,274

 

 
2,274

 
(520
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1984
Red Lobster
 
Deptford
 
NJ
 

 

 
1,608

 

 
1,608

 
(390
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Vineland
 
NJ
 

 

 
1,779

 

 
1,779

 
(319
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Clovis
 
NM
 

 

 
318

 

 
318

 
(126
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Farmington
 
NM
 

 
855

 
2,287

 

 
3,142

 
(281
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Amherst
 
NY
 

 
1,344

 
1,271

 

 
2,615

 
(184
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Brooklyn
 
NY
 

 

 
5,897

 

 
5,897

 
(1,190
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Henrietta
 
NY
 

 
956

 
2,934

 

 
3,890

 
(315
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Hicksville
 
NY
 

 

 
870

 

 
870

 
(214
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Liverpool
 
NY
 

 
900

 
2,088

 

 
2,988

 
(237
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Poughkeepsie
 
NY
 

 
1,987

 
669

 

 
2,656

 
(111
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Rochester
 
NY
 

 
756

 
2,122

 

 
2,878

 
(268
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1985
Red Lobster
 
Ronkonkoma
 
NY
 

 

 
1,109

 

 
1,109

 
(268
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2005
Red Lobster
 
Valley Stream
 
NY
 

 

 
1,417

 

 
1,417

 
(354
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
Vestal
 
NY
 

 
1,027

 
2,255

 

 
3,282

 
(250
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976

F-169



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Watertown
 
NY
 

 
807

 
1,586

 

 
2,393

 
(231
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Yonkers
 
NY
 

 

 
894

 

 
894

 
(224
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2012
Red Lobster
 
Akron
 
OH
 

 

 
1,398

 

 
1,398

 
(324
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Beavercreek
 
OH
 

 
551

 
2,334

 

 
2,885

 
(285
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Red Lobster
 
Canton
 
OH
 

 
398

 
2,596

 

 
2,994

 
(262
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
1,484

 
1,687

 

 
3,171

 
(180
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
365

 
2,344

 

 
2,709

 
(243
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Columbus
 
OH
 

 

 
1,100

 

 
1,100

 
(284
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2002
Red Lobster
 
Columbus
 
OH
 

 
787

 
2,123

 

 
2,910

 
(222
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Cuyahoga Falls
 
OH
 

 
306

 
2,511

 

 
2,817

 
(254
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
Dublin
 
OH
 

 

 
873

 

 
873

 
(198
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Lancaster
 
OH
 

 
737

 
1,570

 

 
2,307

 
(204
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Lima
 
OH
 

 
843

 
658

 

 
1,501

 
(140
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Mansfield
 
OH
 

 
335

 
1,697

 

 
2,032

 
(192
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Mentor
 
OH
 

 
651

 
2,129

 

 
2,780

 
(232
)
 
7/30/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Miamisburg
 
OH
 

 
612

 
2,615

 

 
3,227

 
(251
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
New Philadelphia
 
OH
 

 
232

 
1,349

 

 
1,581

 
(195
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Niles
 
OH
 

 

 
1,799

 

 
1,799

 
(361
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
North Olmsted
 
OH
 

 

 
2,291

 

 
2,291

 
(402
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
Parma
 
OH
 

 
466

 
2,156

 

 
2,622

 
(227
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Sandusky
 
OH
 

 
1,290

 
1,126

 

 
2,416

 
(163
)
 
7/30/2014
 
1986
Red Lobster
 
St. Clairsville
 
OH
 

 

 
853

 

 
853

 
(300
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1997
Red Lobster
 
Wooster
 
OH
 

 
200

 
1,205

 

 
1,405

 
(188
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Youngstown
 
OH
 

 
214

 
2,477

 

 
2,691

 
(268
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Muskogee
 
OK
 

 
399

 
1,707

 

 
2,106

 
(233
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
610

 
2,681

 

 
3,291

 
(275
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Oklahoma City
 
OK
 

 
800

 
1,960

 

 
2,760

 
(235
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Shawnee
 
OK
 

 
437

 
1,744

 

 
2,181

 
(218
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
London
 
ON
 

 
1,502

 
649

 

 
2,151

 
(156
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1986
Red Lobster
 
Bartonsville
 
PA
 

 

 
2,389

 

 
2,389

 
(419
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2010
Red Lobster
 
Chambersburg
 
PA
 

 
694

 
1,212

 

 
1,906

 
(191
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Du Bois
 
PA
 

 
317

 
981

 

 
1,298

 
(168
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995

F-170



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Greensburg
 
PA
 

 
748

 
2,432

 

 
3,180

 
(266
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1989
Red Lobster
 
Hanover
 
PA
 

 
446

 
1,870

 

 
2,316

 
(246
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Lancaster
 
PA
 

 

 
2,968

 

 
2,968

 
(450
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Langhorne
 
PA
 

 
979

 
2,735

 

 
3,714

 
(328
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Mechanicsburg
 
PA
 

 
676

 
2,656

 

 
3,332

 
(280
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Philadelphia
 
PA
 

 

 
1,902

 

 
1,902

 
(301
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 

 
1,379

 

 
1,379

 
(328
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
1,352

 
1,190

 

 
2,542

 
(141
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
1,641

 
1,096

 

 
2,737

 
(146
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1987
Red Lobster
 
Pottstown
 
PA
 

 

 
1,115

 

 
1,115

 
(419
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Scranton
 
PA
 

 

 
1,563

 

 
1,563

 
(405
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2001
Red Lobster
 
Springfield
 
PA
 

 
1,571

 
2,344

 

 
3,915

 
(282
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
State College
 
PA
 

 

 
1,026

 

 
1,026

 
(340
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1999
Red Lobster
 
Washington
 
PA
 

 

 
694

 

 
694

 
(155
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Whitehall
 
PA
 

 

 
2,155

 

 
2,155

 
(530
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1977
Red Lobster
 
Aiken
 
SC
 

 
780

 
1,247

 

 
2,027

 
(183
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 

 
918

 

 
918

 
(210
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Florence
 
SC
 

 
779

 
1,506

 

 
2,285

 
(209
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Myrtle Beach
 
SC
 

 

 
462

 

 
462

 
(171
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2006
Red Lobster
 
Spartanburg
 
SC
 

 

 
1,136

 

 
1,136

 
(206
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Sumter
 
SC
 

 
988

 
1,117

 

 
2,105

 
(187
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
1,548

 
2,575

 

 
4,123

 
(247
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Clarksville
 
TN
 

 
543

 
2,223

 

 
2,766

 
(253
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1990
Red Lobster
 
Jackson
 
TN
 

 
822

 
1,427

 

 
2,249

 
(214
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
1,602

 
2,290

 

 
3,892

 
(237
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1972
Red Lobster
 
Sevierville
 
TN
 

 

 
1,062

 

 
1,062

 
(287
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2002
Red Lobster
 
Abilene
 
TX
 

 
209

 
1,976

 

 
2,185

 
(224
)
 
7/30/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
590

 
2,342

 

 
2,932

 
(248
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Burleson
 
TX
 

 

 
356

 

 
356

 
(147
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
College Station
 
TX
 

 

 
643

 

 
643

 
(156
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1983
Red Lobster
 
Conroe
 
TX
 

 

 
557

 

 
557

 
(177
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2011
Red Lobster
 
Denton
 
TX
 

 
832

 
2,044

 

 
2,876

 
(263
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991

F-171



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Duncanville
 
TX
 

 
361

 
2,658

 

 
3,019

 
(272
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
El Paso
 
TX
 

 

 
414

 

 
414

 
(162
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
El Paso
 
TX
 

 

 
883

 

 
883

 
(210
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2008
Red Lobster
 
Fort Worth
 
TX
 

 

 
239

 

 
239

 
(93
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 

 
399

 

 
399

 
(156
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
960

 
1,833

 

 
2,793

 
(209
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Humble
 
TX
 

 

 
1,087

 

 
1,087

 
(225
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1980
Red Lobster
 
Killeen
 
TX
 

 
732

 
1,935

 

 
2,667

 
(242
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1991
Red Lobster
 
Laredo
 
TX
 

 

 
819

 

 
819

 
(235
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Lewisville
 
TX
 

 
1,087

 
1,626

 
(106
)
 
2,607

 
(180
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1973
Red Lobster
 
Longview
 
TX
 

 
324

 
2,625

 

 
2,949

 
(284
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
1,103

 
1,494

 

 
2,597

 
(179
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1976
Red Lobster
 
Lufkin
 
TX
 

 
15

 
1,732

 

 
1,747

 
(232
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1996
Red Lobster
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 

 
1,175

 
2,280

 

 
3,455

 
(257
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Mcallen
 
TX
 

 
960

 
1,647

 

 
2,607

 
(248
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2010
Red Lobster
 
N. Richland Hills
 
TX
 

 
493

 
2,889

 

 
3,382

 
(302
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1978
Red Lobster
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 

 
963

 

 
963

 
(170
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1974
Red Lobster
 
Sugar Land
 
TX
 

 

 
708

 

 
708

 
(158
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1981
Red Lobster
 
Texarkana
 
TX
 

 
73

 
2,148

 

 
2,221

 
(257
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1986
Red Lobster
 
Tyler
 
TX
 

 
884

 
1,755

 

 
2,639

 
(209
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Victoria
 
TX
 

 
478

 
1,905

 

 
2,383

 
(224
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1984
Red Lobster
 
Layton
 
UT
 

 
1,577

 
1,333

 

 
2,910

 
(209
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Bristol
 
VA
 

 
816

 
1,175

 

 
1,991

 
(179
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2005
Red Lobster
 
Charlottesville
 
VA
 

 

 
1,021

 

 
1,021

 
(202
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1986
Red Lobster
 
Chesapeake
 
VA
 

 
1,262

 
1,374

 

 
2,636

 
(176
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Lobster
 
Harrisonburg
 
VA
 

 
465

 
1,369

 

 
1,834

 
(212
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Manassas
 
VA
 

 
1,800

 
941

 

 
2,741

 
(155
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993
Red Lobster
 
Midlothian
 
VA
 

 

 
655

 

 
655

 
(211
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Sterling
 
VA
 

 

 
646

 

 
646

 
(206
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2001
Red Lobster
 
Winchester
 
VA
 

 

 
357

 

 
357

 
(145
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2006
Red Lobster
 
Olympia
 
WA
 

 

 
596

 

 
596

 
(238
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1995
Red Lobster
 
Silverdale
 
WA
 

 
1,661

 
501

 

 
2,162

 
(127
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1993

F-172



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Red Lobster
 
Spokane
 
WA
 

 

 
1,427

 

 
1,427

 
(289
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2009
Red Lobster
 
Ashwaubenon
 
WI
 

 
1,270

 
1,116

 

 
2,386

 
(151
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Eau Claire
 
WI
 

 
527

 
1,534

 

 
2,061

 
(206
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1982
Red Lobster
 
Greenfield
 
WI
 

 
1,823

 
1,673

 

 
3,496

 
(191
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Mt. Pleasant
 
WI
 

 
856

 
1,773

 

 
2,629

 
(270
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2012
Red Lobster
 
Wauwatosa
 
WI
 

 
1,524

 
997

 

 
2,521

 
(138
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1975
Red Lobster
 
Charleston
 
WV
 

 

 
1,100

 

 
1,100

 
(288
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2003
Red Lobster
 
Huntington
 
WV
 

 
344

 
2,552

 

 
2,896

 
(297
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1985
Red Lobster
 
Morgantown
 
WV
 

 
1,252

 
1,477

 

 
2,729

 
(225
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2009
Red Lobster
 
Parkersburg
 
WV
 

 
654

 
1,447

 

 
2,101

 
(221
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1994
Red Lobster
 
Casper
 
WY
 

 
1,014

 
1,337

 

 
2,351

 
(233
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2011
Red Lobster
 
Cheyenne
 
WY
 

 
1,514

 
640

 

 
2,154

 
(79
)
 
7/28/2014
 
1992
Red Oak Village
 
San Marcos
 
TX
 
12,480

 
5,287

 
20,357

 
171

 
25,815

 
(4,006
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Reef Services, LLC
 
Gainesville
 
TX
 

 
86

 
285

 

 
371

 
(46
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2009
Ridley Pointe
 
Smyrna
 
TN
 

 
2,009

 
9,467

 
109

 
11,585

 
(103
)
 
8/25/2017
 
2016
Rite Aid
 
Talladega
 
AL
 

 
377

 
1,311

 

 
1,688

 
(316
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1997
Rite Aid
 
Bear
 
DE
 

 
851

 
2,702

 

 
3,553

 
(662
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
Tucker
 
GA
 

 
793

 
1,419

 

 
2,212

 
(341
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1996
Rite Aid
 
Jeffersonville
 
IN
 

 
824

 
2,472

 

 
3,296

 
(751
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2008
Rite Aid
 
Lawrenceburg
 
KY
 

 
567

 
2,267

 

 
2,834

 
(689
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2008
Rite Aid
 
Lexington
 
KY
 

 

 
1,943

 

 
1,943

 
(590
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2007
Rite Aid
 
Paris
 
KY
 

 
743

 
2,228

 

 
2,971

 
(677
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2008
Rite Aid
 
Scottsville
 
KY
 

 
153

 
2,904

 

 
3,057

 
(882
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2007
Rite Aid
 
Stanford
 
KY
 

 
152

 
2,886

 

 
3,038

 
(876
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2009
Rite Aid
 
Adams
 
MA
 

 
300

 
1,200

 

 
1,500

 
(321
)
 
7/30/2013
 
1958
Rite Aid
 
Bangor
 
ME
 

 
724

 
2,896

 

 
3,620

 
(643
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1998
Rite Aid
 
Buxton
 
ME
 

 

 

 
2,131

 
2,131

 
(375
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1997
Rite Aid
 
Dover-Foxcroft
 
ME
 

 
256

 
2,659

 

 
2,915

 
(653
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
Fort Fairfield
 
ME
 

 
117

 
1,821

 
76

 
2,014

 
(451
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Rite Aid
 
Fort Kent
 
ME
 

 
387

 
2,064

 

 
2,451

 
(496
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1999

F-173



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Rite Aid
 
Van Buren
 
ME
 

 
115

 
1,720

 

 
1,835

 
(425
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Rite Aid
 
Bay City
 
MI
 

 
463

 
1,629

 
62

 
2,154

 
(316
)
 
6/24/2014
 
1996
Rite Aid
 
Burton
 
MI
 

 
128

 
2,541

 
(50
)
 
2,619

 
(674
)
 
7/26/2013
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
West Branch
 
MI
 

 
418

 
1,280

 
70

 
1,768

 
(269
)
 
6/23/2014
 
1996
Rite Aid
 
Burlington
 
NC
 

 
973

 
2,726

 

 
3,699

 
(669
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2000
Rite Aid
 
Wilson
 
NC
 

 
573

 
1,337

 

 
1,910

 
(358
)
 
7/30/2013
 
2002
Rite Aid
 
Bristol
 
NH
 

 
395

 
1,461

 
52

 
1,908

 
(364
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1997
Rite Aid
 
Winchester
 
NH
 

 
343

 
1,868

 

 
2,211

 
(460
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Rite Aid
 
Cheektowaga
 
NY
 

 
436

 
3,466

 

 
3,902

 
(767
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Rite Aid
 
Genoa
 
OH
 

 
405

 
1,845

 

 
2,250

 
(442
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Rite Aid
 
Lima
 
OH
 

 
576

 
2,304

 

 
2,880

 
(700
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2006
Rite Aid
 
Louisville
 
OH
 

 
576

 
3,266

 

 
3,842

 
(1,000
)
 
10/31/2012
 
2008
Rite Aid
 
Marion
 
OH
 

 
508

 
2,877

 

 
3,385

 
(874
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2006
Rite Aid
 
St. Marys
 
OH
 

 
581

 
2,322

 

 
2,903

 
(501
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2005
Rite Aid
 
Warren
 
OH
 

 
668

 
2,670

 
62

 
3,400

 
(590
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
Wheelersburg
 
OH
 

 
361

 
1,444

 
65

 
1,870

 
(329
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1998
Rite Aid
 
Meadville
 
PA
 

 
193

 
2,521

 

 
2,714

 
(602
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
Philadelphia
 
PA
 

 
633

 
2,531

 

 
3,164

 
(567
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
Spartanburg
 
SC
 

 
894

 
3,575

 

 
4,469

 
(771
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2004
Rite Aid
 
Travelers Rest
 
SC
 

 
882

 
3,527

 

 
4,409

 
(761
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2005
Rite Aid
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
266

 
1,062

 
54

 
1,382

 
(244
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2000
Rite Aid
 
Murfreesboro
 
TN
 

 
454

 
1,817

 

 
2,271

 
(392
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1999
Rite Aid
 
Hayes
 
VA
 

 
812

 
3,247

 

 
4,059

 
(701
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2005
Rite Aid
 
Huntington
 
WV
 

 
964

 
2,250

 

 
3,214

 
(684
)
 
11/30/2012
 
2008
Road Ranger
 
Winnebago
 
IL
 

 
707

 
3,202

 

 
3,909

 
(716
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Rockwell Collins
 
Sterling
 
VA
 

 
4,285

 
29,802

 
823

 
34,910

 
(4,928
)
 
6/30/2014
 
2011
Ross
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
658

 
2,631

 
700

 
3,989

 
(726
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2002
Ross
 
Port Arthur
 
TX
 
8,077

 
3,331

 
14,992

 

 
18,323

 
(2,887
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Rubbermaid
 
Winfield
 
KS
 

 
819

 
15,555

 

 
16,374

 
(4,816
)
 
11/28/2012
 
2012
Rubbermaid
 
Winfield
 
KS
 

 
1,056

 
20,060

 

 
21,116

 
(6,644
)
 
4/25/2012
 
2008
Rubbermaid
 
Bowling Green
 
OH
 

 
714

 
13,564

 

 
14,278

 
(3,689
)
 
7/29/2013
 
2013
Rubbermaid
 
Brimfield
 
OH
 

 
1,552

 
29,495

 

 
31,047

 
(8,921
)
 
1/31/2013
 
2012

F-174



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Ruby Tuesday
 
Dillon
 
CO
 

 
400

 
1,628

 

 
2,028

 
(416
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Ruby Tuesday
 
Bartow
 
FL
 

 
270

 
1,916

 

 
2,186

 
(490
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Ruby Tuesday
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
1,286

 

 
(710
)
 
576

 

 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Ruby Tuesday
 
Somerset
 
KY
 

 
480

 
1,120

 

 
1,600

 
(286
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Ryan's Buffet
 
Commerce
 
GA
 

 
962

 
1,470

 
(647
)
 
1,785

 
(203
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Ryan's Buffet
 
Rome
 
GA
 

 
831

 
1,848

 
(919
)
 
1,760

 
(207
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1983
Ryan's Buffet
 
Asheville
 
NC
 

 
1,261

 
2,204

 
(1,179
)
 
2,286

 
(259
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Ryan's Buffet
 
Clarksburg
 
WV
 

 

 
1,639

 
(1,305
)
 
334

 
(48
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2001
Salty's
 
Jasper
 
AL
 

 
140

 
219

 

 
359

 
(56
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
The Salvation Army
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
2,640

 
10,559

 

 
13,199

 
(2,162
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2004
Sam's Club
 
Hoover
 
AL
 

 
2,253

 
9,606

 

 
11,859

 
(1,825
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
Sam's Club
 
Colorado Springs
 
CO
 

 
3,347

 
12,652

 

 
15,999

 
(2,366
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Sam's Club
 
Douglasville
 
GA
 

 
1,701

 
11,052

 

 
12,753

 
(1,926
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Sam's Southern Eatery
 
Kennesaw
 
GA
 

 
210

 
46

 

 
256

 
(12
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Santa Rosa Commons
 
Pace
 
FL
 
13,000

 
4,447

 
21,884

 
58

 
26,389

 
(4,110
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Savers
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
740

 
2,958

 

 
3,698

 
(609
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2002
Schlotzsky's
 
Colorado Springs
 
CO
 

 
530

 
530

 

 
1,060

 
(133
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997
Schmitz & Schmitz
 
Gainesville
 
TX
 

 
29

 
1,950

 

 
1,979

 
(262
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1930
Scotts Company
 
Orrville
 
OH
 

 
278

 
2,502

 

 
2,780

 
(790
)
 
9/28/2012
 
1950
Scotts Company
 
Orrville
 
OH
 

 
611

 
1,134

 

 
1,745

 
(365
)
 
7/30/2012
 
1950
Scotts Company
 
Orrville
 
OH
 

 
609

 
11,576

 

 
12,185

 
(3,727
)
 
7/30/2012
 
2006
SCP Distributors
 
North Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
258

 
1,665

 
(9
)
 
1,914

 
(229
)
 
11/20/2014
 
2006
SCP Distributors
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
251

 
900

 

 
1,151

 
(145
)
 
11/20/2014
 
2012
Sedwick Claims Management Serv
 
Dublin
 
OH
 

 
945

 
8,520

 

 
9,465

 
(1,451
)
 
6/26/2014
 
1997
Select Energy Services
 
Damascus
 
AR
 

 
530

 
800

 

 
1,330

 
(238
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2009
Select Energy Services
 
Frierson
 
LA
 

 
260

 
4,954

 

 
5,214

 
(787
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2010
Select Energy Services
 
Alderson
 
OK
 

 
260

 
1,150

 

 
1,410

 
(229
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2008
Select Energy Services
 
Big Wells
 
TX
 

 
353

 
1,820

 

 
2,173

 
(291
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2011
Select Energy Services
 
Chireno
 
TX
 

 
388

 
5,470

 

 
5,858

 
(861
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2011
Select Energy Services
 
Cleburne
 
TX
 

 
154

 
2,333

 

 
2,487

 
(374
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2008
Select Energy Services
 
Dilley
 
TX
 

 
308

 
1,416

 

 
1,724

 
(237
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2012
Select Energy Services
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
460

 
1,998

 

 
2,458

 
(353
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1982

F-175



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Senor Panchos
 
Orrville
 
OH
 

 
99

 
176

 

 
275

 
(46
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1990
Shale Tank Truck
 
Cleburne
 
TX
 

 
476

 
547

 

 
1,023

 
(96
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2007
Shale Tank Truck
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
757

 
939

 

 
1,696

 
(173
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2012
Sherwin-Williams
 
Angola
 
IN
 

 
249

 
996

 

 
1,245

 
(202
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2001
Sherwin-Williams
 
Muskegon
 
MI
 

 
187

 
1,524

 

 
1,711

 
(315
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Sherwin-Williams
 
Ashtabula
 
OH
 

 
176

 
704

 

 
880

 
(116
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2003
Sherwin-Williams
 
Boardman
 
OH
 

 
206

 
825

 

 
1,031

 
(136
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2003
Shoney's
 
Gadsden
 
AL
 

 
220

 
707

 

 
927

 
(181
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Oxford
 
AL
 

 
670

 
25

 

 
695

 
(6
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Grayson
 
KY
 

 
420

 
406

 

 
826

 
(104
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Grenada
 
MS
 

 
270

 
809

 

 
1,079

 
(190
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Hattiesburg
 
MS
 

 
730

 
618

 

 
1,348

 
(158
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Jackson
 
MS
 

 
360

 
572

 

 
932

 
(146
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Summerville
 
SC
 

 
350

 
800

 

 
1,150

 
(204
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Cookeville
 
TN
 

 
510

 
760

 

 
1,270

 
(194
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Lawrenceburg
 
TN
 

 
330

 
873

 

 
1,203

 
(223
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Charleston
 
WV
 

 
190

 
543

 

 
733

 
(139
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Lewisburg
 
WV
 

 
110

 
642

 

 
752

 
(164
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Princeton
 
WV
 

 
90

 
593

 

 
683

 
(152
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shoney's
 
Ripley
 
WV
 

 
200

 
599

 

 
799

 
(153
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Shopko Hometown
 
L'Anse
 
MI
 

 
382

 
1,736

 

 
2,118

 
(371
)
 
5/13/2014
 
2009
Sierra Pines
 
The Woodlands
 
TX
 
14,941

 
5,219

 
19,196

 
6,893

 
31,308

 
(1,974
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2014
Smokey Bones
 
Morrow
 
GA
 

 
390

 
2,184

 

 
2,574

 
(558
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Smokey Bones
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
1,490

 
390

 

 
1,880

 
(113
)
 
7/28/2014
 
2000
Sonic Drive-In
 
Wadesboro
 
NC
 

 
137

 
266

 

 
403

 
(67
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2007
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ
 
Venice
 
FL
 

 
338

 
507

 

 
845

 
(134
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ
 
Athens
 
GA
 

 
460

 
1,280

 

 
1,740

 
(327
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ
 
Conyers
 
GA
 

 
450

 
663

 

 
1,113

 
(169
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ
 
Marietta
 
GA
 

 
290

 
1,772

 

 
2,062

 
(453
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Southern Kitchen
 
Prattville
 
AL
 

 
1,038

 
1,802

 
(1,871
)
 
969

 
(79
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Sovereign Bank
 
Linden
 
NJ
 

 
601

 
2,329

 

 
2,930

 
(516
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1945
Sovereign Bank
 
Kennett Square
 
PA
 

 
837

 
2,412

 

 
3,249

 
(536
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1963

F-176



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Spaghetti Warehouse
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
630

 
1,400

 

 
2,030

 
(358
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Spaghetti Warehouse
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
1,140

 
1,434

 
(1,063
)
 
1,511

 
(53
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Sprouts
 
Centennial
 
CO
 

 
1,581

 
6,394

 

 
7,975

 
(1,407
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
St. Luke's Urgent Care
 
Creve Coeur
 
MO
 

 
1,644

 
4,497

 

 
6,141

 
(1,022
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Staples
 
Pensacola
 
FL
 

 
1,539

 
3,354

 

 
4,893

 
(598
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Staples
 
Helena
 
MT
 

 
1,159

 
2,452

 

 
3,611

 
(465
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Staples
 
Houston
 
TX
 
1,815

 
1,169

 
3,192

 

 
4,361

 
(573
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Starbucks
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
680

 
1,533

 

 
2,213

 
(379
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Steak 'n Shake
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
951

 

 
785

 
1,736

 
(39
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Stearns Crossing
 
Bartlett
 
IL
 
7,060

 
4,437

 
5,970

 
376

 
10,783

 
(1,517
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Stop & Shop
 
Levittown
 
PA
 

 
4,716

 
9,955

 

 
14,671

 
(2,050
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1995
Stop & Shop
 
Cranston
 
RI
 

 
4,309

 

 

 
4,309

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Stripes
 
Portales
 
NM
 

 
306

 
2,595

 

 
2,901

 
(610
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Andrews
 
TX
 

 
406

 
2,302

 

 
2,708

 
(630
)
 
2/15/2013
 
2008
Stripes
 
Brady
 
TX
 

 
203

 
3,205

 

 
3,408

 
(691
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Brownsville
 
TX
 

 
613

 
3,195

 

 
3,808

 
(707
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Carrizo Springs
 
TX
 

 
496

 
2,526

 

 
3,022

 
(610
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
681

 
2,047

 

 
2,728

 
(461
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
1,011

 
3,125

 

 
4,136

 
(696
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
803

 
3,109

 

 
3,912

 
(693
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Eagle Pass
 
TX
 

 
762

 
2,453

 

 
3,215

 
(555
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Stripes
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
1,286

 
1,546

 

 
2,832

 
(352
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Stripes
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
488

 
2,499

 

 
2,987

 
(598
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
450

 
2,818

 

 
3,268

 
(564
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
Fort Stockton
 
TX
 

 
1,237

 
3,812

 

 
5,049

 
(992
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Haskell
 
TX
 

 
143

 
2,554

 

 
2,697

 
(596
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
1,204

 
2,069

 

 
3,273

 
(450
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Stripes
 
La Feria
 
TX
 

 
219

 
1,970

 

 
2,189

 
(540
)
 
2/15/2013
 
2008
Stripes
 
Laredo
 
TX
 

 
581

 
2,367

 

 
2,948

 
(563
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Laredo
 
TX
 

 
626

 
2,338

 

 
2,964

 
(567
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
1,098

 
4,857

 

 
5,955

 
(1,070
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Stripes
 
Mission
 
TX
 

 
742

 
550

 

 
1,292

 
(117
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1986

F-177



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Stripes
 
Mission
 
TX
 

 
1,007

 
3,178

 
(33
)
 
4,152

 
(660
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Stripes
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
301

 
2,895

 

 
3,196

 
(647
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Stripes
 
Odessa
 
TX
 

 
803

 
3,596

 

 
4,399

 
(1,155
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Stripes
 
Pharr
 
TX
 

 
281

 
2,531

 

 
2,812

 
(693
)
 
2/15/2013
 
1995
Stripes
 
Ranchito
 
TX
 

 
498

 
2,671

 

 
3,169

 
(588
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Stripes
 
Rio Hondo
 
TX
 

 
293

 
2,640

 

 
2,933

 
(723
)
 
2/15/2013
 
2008
Stripes
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
772

 
4,025

 

 
4,797

 
(889
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Stripes
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
1,006

 
3,277

 

 
4,283

 
(728
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Subway
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
160

 
349

 

 
509

 
(86
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Sun Trust Bank
 
Coral Springs
 
FL
 

 
654

 
1,525

 

 
2,179

 
(385
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1996
Sun Trust Bank
 
Destin
 
FL
 

 
572

 
1,717

 

 
2,289

 
(433
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1998
Sun Trust Bank
 
Dunedin
 
FL
 

 
479

 
1,917

 

 
2,396

 
(492
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1995
Sun Trust Bank
 
Dunnellon
 
FL
 

 
82

 
463

 

 
545

 
(119
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1980
Sun Trust Bank
 
Kissimmee
 
FL
 

 
1,167

 
778

 

 
1,945

 
(196
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1981
Sun Trust Bank
 
Lakeland
 
FL
 

 
598

 
1,110

 

 
1,708

 
(280
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1988
Sun Trust Bank
 
North Port
 
FL
 

 
460

 
1,381

 

 
1,841

 
(355
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1982
Sun Trust Bank
 
Palm Harbor
 
FL
 

 
535

 
1,249

 

 
1,784

 
(315
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1994
Sun Trust Bank
 
Plant City
 
FL
 

 
751

 
1,753

 

 
2,504

 
(450
)
 
3/22/2013
 
2000
Sun Trust Bank
 
Port Orange
 
FL
 

 
590

 
1,095

 

 
1,685

 
(281
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1989
Sun Trust Bank
 
Port Orange
 
FL
 

 
563

 
1,314

 

 
1,877

 
(337
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1982
Sun Trust Bank
 
S. Daytona Beach
 
FL
 

 
592

 
1,099

 

 
1,691

 
(277
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1985
Sun Trust Bank
 
West Palm Beach
 
FL
 

 
1,026

 
1,026

 

 
2,052

 
(263
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1981
Sun Trust Bank
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
1,018

 
1,527

 

 
2,545

 
(385
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1965
Sun Trust Bank
 
Atlanta
 
GA
 

 
1,435

 
478

 

 
1,913

 
(121
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1970
Sun Trust Bank
 
Dunwoody
 
GA
 

 
1,784

 
1,460

 

 
3,244

 
(375
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1972
Sun Trust Bank
 
Jesup
 
GA
 

 
184

 
1,657

 

 
1,841

 
(425
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1964
Sun Trust Bank
 
St. Simons Island
 
GA
 

 
1,363

 
734

 

 
2,097

 
(188
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1975
Sun Trust Bank
 
Annapolis
 
MD
 

 
2,653

 
2,170

 

 
4,823

 
(518
)
 
7/23/2013
 
1976
Sun Trust Bank
 
Ellicott City
 
MD
 

 
1,728

 
931

 

 
2,659

 
(239
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1975
Sun Trust Bank
 
Frederick
 
MD
 

 
991

 
991

 

 
1,982

 
(250
)
 
4/26/2013
 
1880
Sun Trust Bank
 
Waldorf
 
MD
 

 
523

 
2,962

 

 
3,485

 
(761
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1964
Sun Trust Bank
 
Belmont
 
NC
 

 
616

 
924

 

 
1,540

 
(237
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1970

F-178



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Sun Trust Bank
 
Carrboro
 
NC
 

 
512

 
512

 

 
1,024

 
(129
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1980
Sun Trust Bank
 
Concord
 
NC
 

 
707

 
707

 

 
1,414

 
(178
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1988
Sun Trust Bank
 
Durham
 
NC
 

 
747

 
1,388

 

 
2,135

 
(350
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1973
Sun Trust Bank
 
Greensboro
 
NC
 

 
403

 
748

 

 
1,151

 
(189
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1962
Sun Trust Bank
 
Lexington
 
NC
 

 
447

 
831

 

 
1,278

 
(210
)
 
4/12/2013
 
2001
Sun Trust Bank
 
Matthews
 
NC
 

 
382

 
382

 

 
764

 
(98
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1971
Sun Trust Bank
 
Mocksville
 
NC
 

 
978

 
2,933

 

 
3,911

 
(753
)
 
3/22/2013
 
2000
Sun Trust Bank
 
Raleigh
 
NC
 

 
658

 
658

 

 
1,316

 
(169
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1977
Sun Trust Bank
 
Chattanooga
 
TN
 

 
223

 
1,263

 

 
1,486

 
(324
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1953
Sun Trust Bank
 
Madison
 
TN
 

 
286

 
1,143

 

 
1,429

 
(293
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1953
Sun Trust Bank
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
567

 
305

 

 
872

 
(73
)
 
7/23/2013
 
1954
Sun Trust Bank
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
1,598

 
1,308

 

 
2,906

 
(330
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1992
Sun Trust Bank
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
613

 
613

 

 
1,226

 
(155
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1970
Sun Trust Bank
 
Cheriton
 
VA
 

 
90

 
510

 

 
600

 
(131
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1975

F-179



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Sun Trust Bank
 
Lynchburg
 
VA
 

 
251

 
466

 

 
717

 
(120
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1973
Sun Trust Bank
 
Petersburg
 
VA
 

 
102

 
306

 

 
408

 
(77
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1975
Sun Trust Bank
 
Richmond
 
VA
 

 
277

 
416

 

 
693

 
(107
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1959
Sun Trust Bank
 
Richmond
 
VA
 

 
224

 
2,012

 

 
2,236

 
(507
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1909
Sun Trust Bank
 
Rocky Mount
 
VA
 

 
265

 
1,504

 

 
1,769

 
(373
)
 
5/22/2013
 
1961
Sunbelt Rental
 
Mabelvale
 
AR
 

 
240

 
894

 

 
1,134

 
(160
)
 
6/4/2014
 
2006
Sunbelt Rental
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
365

 
929

 
128

 
1,422

 
(173
)
 
9/26/2014
 
1995
Sunoco
 
Merritt Island
 
FL
 

 
540

 
2,162

 

 
2,702

 
(355
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2009
Sunset Valley Homestead
 
Sunset Valley
 
TX
 
16,894

 
14,283

 
28,351

 
47

 
42,681

 
(5,530
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Superior Energy Services
 
Gainesville
 
TX
 

 
284

 
10,475

 
(3
)
 
10,756

 
(5,380
)
 
7/24/2014
 
1982
Sweet Tomato
 
Coral Springs
 
FL
 

 
790

 
1,625

 

 
2,415

 
(415
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Synovus Bank
 
Tampa
 
FL
 

 
985

 
2,298

 

 
3,283

 
(618
)
 
12/31/2012
 
1959
Sysmex
 
Lincolnshire
 
IL
 
22,500

 
4,143

 
36,987

 
5

 
41,135

 
(6,983
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Taco Bell
 
Albertville
 
AL
 

 
419

 
778

 

 
1,197

 
(183
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Cullman
 
AL
 

 
375

 
1,053

 

 
1,428

 
(265
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Daphne
 
AL
 

 
180

 
1,278

 

 
1,458

 
(316
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Dora
 
AL
 

 
348

 
813

 

 
1,161

 
(191
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Foley
 
AL
 

 
360

 
1,460

 

 
1,820

 
(361
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Hartselle
 
AL
 

 
378

 
781

 

 
1,159

 
(196
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Jasper
 
AL
 

 
445

 
814

 

 
1,259

 
(205
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
160

 
1,973

 

 
2,133

 
(487
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Saraland
 
AL
 

 
150

 
1,063

 

 
1,213

 
(263
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Warrior
 
AL
 

 
364

 
675

 

 
1,039

 
(159
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Winfield
 
AL
 

 
278

 
834

 

 
1,112

 
(196
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Corona
 
CA
 

 
306

 
1,138

 

 
1,444

 
(286
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1990
Taco Bell
 
Fairfield
 
CA
 

 
500

 
1,327

 

 
1,827

 
(334
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Taco Bell
 
Fontana
 
CA
 

 
524

 
1,016

 

 
1,540

 
(256
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Taco Bell
 
Montclair
 
CA
 

 
322

 
900

 

 
1,222

 
(227
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1996
Taco Bell
 
Moreno Valley
 
CA
 

 
367

 
998

 

 
1,365

 
(251
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Taco Bell
 
Rancho Cucamonga
 
CA
 

 
415

 
1,210

 

 
1,625

 
(305
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Taco Bell
 
Rubidoux
 
CA
 

 
415

 
1,223

 

 
1,638

 
(308
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Taco Bell
 
Suisun City
 
CA
 

 
355

 
1,419

 

 
1,774

 
(334
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986

F-180



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Taco Bell
 
Vacaville
 
CA
 

 
522

 
1,513

 

 
2,035

 
(381
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Taco Bell
 
Vacaville
 
CA
 

 
1,184

 
1,375

 

 
2,559

 
(346
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Taco Bell
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
440

 
1,167

 

 
1,607

 
(288
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 

 
340

 
1,383

 

 
1,723

 
(342
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Pensacola
 
FL
 

 
140

 
1,897

 

 
2,037

 
(469
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Augusta
 
GA
 

 
220

 
1,292

 

 
1,512

 
(319
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Hephzibah
 
GA
 

 
330

 
930

 

 
1,260

 
(230
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Jesup
 
GA
 

 
230

 
715

 

 
945

 
(177
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Kennesaw
 
GA
 

 
162

 
601

 

 
763

 
(151
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Taco Bell
 
Waycross
 
GA
 

 
170

 
1,115

 

 
1,285

 
(275
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Crawfordsville
 
IN
 

 
234

 
934

 

 
1,168

 
(220
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Taco Bell
 
Hartford City
 
IN
 

 
99

 
889

 

 
988

 
(209
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Taco Bell
 
Kokomo
 
IN
 

 
199

 
798

 

 
997

 
(188
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Taco Bell
 
Lafayette
 
IN
 

 
304

 
912

 

 
1,216

 
(215
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Taco Bell
 
Marion
 
IN
 

 
496

 
921

 

 
1,417

 
(217
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Taco Bell
 
Noblesville
 
IN
 

 
363

 
545

 

 
908

 
(128
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Taco Bell
 
Tipton
 
IN
 

 
104

 
936

 

 
1,040

 
(220
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Taco Bell
 
North Corbin
 
KY
 

 
139

 
1,082

 

 
1,221

 
(272
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
124

 
704

 

 
828

 
(166
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Taco Bell
 
St. Louis
 
MO
 

 
190

 
1,951

 

 
2,141

 
(430
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Wentzville
 
MO
 

 
410

 
1,168

 

 
1,578

 
(289
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Brunswick
 
OH
 

 
400

 
1,267

 

 
1,667

 
(313
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
129

 
732

 

 
861

 
(172
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
North Olmstead
 
OH
 

 
390

 
904

 

 
1,294

 
(223
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Kingston
 
TN
 

 
280

 
714

 

 
994

 
(177
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
400

 
1,225

 

 
1,625

 
(303
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Texarkana
 
AR
 

 
111

 
630

 

 
741

 
(148
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Minden
 
LA
 

 
274

 
639

 

 
913

 
(150
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Shreveport
 
LA
 

 
343

 
514

 

 
857

 
(121
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Shreveport
 
LA
 

 
616

 
753

 

 
1,369

 
(177
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Shreveport
 
LA
 

 
427

 
522

 

 
949

 
(123
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Shreveport
 
LA
 

 
352

 
528

 

 
880

 
(124
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998

F-181



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Dunkirk
 
NY
 

 
800

 
978

 

 
1,778

 
(230
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Geneva
 
NY
 

 
569

 
695

 

 
1,264

 
(164
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Canonsburg
 
PA
 

 
176

 
1,586

 

 
1,762

 
(373
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Pittsburgh
 
PA
 

 
180

 
269

 
3

 
452

 
(60
)
 
10/1/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Mount Pleasant
 
TX
 

 
106

 
952

 

 
1,058

 
(224
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1992
Taco Bell / KFC
 
New Boston
 
TX
 

 
125

 
1,127

 

 
1,252

 
(265
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Green Bay
 
WI
 

 
470

 
574

 

 
1,044

 
(135
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
533

 
1,055

 

 
1,588

 
(266
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Taco Bell / KFC
 
Benwood
 
WV
 

 
123

 
287

 
4

 
414

 
(64
)
 
10/1/2013
 
1995
Taco Bell / Pizza Hut
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
420

 
1,582

 

 
2,002

 
(391
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Bueno
 
Hutchinson
 
KS
 

 
561

 
841

 

 
1,402

 
(198
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Taco Bueno
 
Belton
 
MO
 

 
476

 
701

 

 
1,177

 
(176
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2006
Taco Bueno
 
Springfield
 
MO
 

 
753

 
753

 

 
1,506

 
(177
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2006
Taco Bueno
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
597

 
895

 

 
1,492

 
(211
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Taco Bueno
 
Frisco
 
TX
 

 
601

 
577

 

 
1,178

 
(145
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Taco Bueno
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
228

 
561

 

 
789

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Taco Bueno
 
N. Richland Hills
 
TX
 

 
423

 
567

 

 
990

 
(143
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Taco Bueno
 
Waco
 
TX
 

 
595

 
892

 

 
1,487

 
(210
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Taco Bueno
 
Waco
 
TX
 

 
595

 
893

 

 
1,488

 
(210
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Taco Cabana
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
700

 
2,105

 

 
2,805

 
(520
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Cabana
 
Pasadena
 
TX
 

 
420

 
1,420

 

 
1,840

 
(351
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Cabana
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
600

 
1,955

 

 
2,555

 
(483
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Cabana
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
500

 
1,740

 

 
2,240

 
(430
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Cabana
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
280

 
1,695

 

 
1,975

 
(419
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Cabana
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
500

 
1,766

 

 
2,266

 
(436
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Taco Cabana
 
Schertz
 
TX
 

 
520

 
1,408

 

 
1,928

 
(348
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Lawrenceburg
 
IN
 

 
516

 
721

 

 
1,237

 
(13
)
 
6/8/2017
 
2017
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Alexandria
 
KY
 

 
294

 
677

 

 
971

 
(11
)
 
6/8/2017
 
1996
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Erlanger
 
KY
 

 
337

 
1,072

 

 
1,409

 
(16
)
 
6/8/2017
 
2003
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Florence
 
KY
 

 
279

 
896

 

 
1,175

 
(14
)
 
6/8/2017
 
1998
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Fort Wright
 
KY
 

 
179

 
816

 

 
995

 
(13
)
 
6/8/2017
 
1995
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Miamisburg
 
OH
 

 
246

 
486

 

 
732

 
(8
)
 
6/8/2017
 
1992

F-182



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Take 5 Oil Change
 
Moraine
 
OH
 

 
415

 
692

 

 
1,107

 
(11
)
 
6/8/2017
 
1995
Talbots
 
Hingham
 
MA
 
23,362

 
3,009

 
27,080

 

 
30,089

 
(6,043
)
 
5/24/2013
 
1980
Talbots
 
Lakeville
 
MA
 
22,509

 
6,302

 
25,209

 

 
31,511

 
(7,112
)
 
5/17/2013
 
1987
TCF Bank
 
Crystal
 
MN
 

 
640

 
642

 

 
1,282

 
(153
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
TD Bank
 
Falmouth
 
ME
 
19,607

 
4,057

 
23,689

 
(81
)
 
27,665

 
(5,393
)
 
3/18/2013
 
2002
Teva Pharmaceuticals
 
Malvern
 
PA
 

 
2,666

 
40,981

 
(7,009
)
 
36,638

 
(2,448
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1999
Texas Roadhouse
 
Cedar Rapids
 
IA
 

 
430

 
2,194

 

 
2,624

 
(561
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Ammon
 
ID
 

 
490

 
1,206

 

 
1,696

 
(308
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Shively
 
KY
 

 
540

 
2,055

 

 
2,595

 
(525
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Concord
 
NC
 

 
650

 
2,130

 

 
2,780

 
(544
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Gastonia
 
NC
 

 
570

 
1,544

 

 
2,114

 
(395
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Hickory
 
NC
 

 
580

 
1,831

 

 
2,411

 
(468
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
College Station
 
TX
 

 
670

 
2,299

 

 
2,969

 
(588
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Grand Prairie
 
TX
 

 
780

 
1,867

 

 
2,647

 
(477
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Texas Roadhouse
 
Kenosha
 
WI
 

 
1,061

 
1,835

 
(14
)
 
2,882

 
(478
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
TGI Fridays
 
Royal Palm Beach
 
FL
 

 
1,530

 
1,530

 

 
3,060

 
(406
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
TGI Fridays
 
Ann Arbor
 
MI
 

 
547

 
1,640

 

 
2,187

 
(435
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
TGI Fridays
 
Kentwood
 
MI
 

 
281

 
2,533

 

 
2,814

 
(672
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
TGI Fridays
 
Novi
 
MI
 

 
1,042

 
1,042

 

 
2,084

 
(277
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
TGI Fridays
 
Blasdell
 
NY
 

 
1,215

 
1,913

 

 
3,128

 
(498
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
TGI Fridays
 
Warwick
 
RI
 

 
1,228

 
2,775

 
(1,252
)
 
2,751

 
(295
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Thorntons Oil
 
Bloomington
 
IL
 

 
1,184

 
733

 

 
1,917

 
(191
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1992
Thorntons Oil
 
Franklin Park
 
IL
 

 
1,403

 
1,882

 

 
3,285

 
(435
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1989
Thorntons Oil
 
Joliet
 
IL
 

 
953

 
2,539

 

 
3,492

 
(583
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Thorntons Oil
 
Oaklawn
 
IL
 

 
1,203

 
898

 
278

 
2,379

 
(225
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Thorntons Oil
 
Ottawa
 
IL
 

 
565

 
2,003

 

 
2,568

 
(475
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Thorntons Oil
 
Plainfield
 
IL
 

 
862

 
1,338

 

 
2,200

 
(326
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Thorntons Oil
 
Roselle
 
IL
 

 
661

 
2,194

 

 
2,855

 
(488
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Thorntons Oil
 
South Elgin
 
IL
 

 
1,239

 
1,688

 

 
2,927

 
(427
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Thorntons Oil
 
Springfield
 
IL
 

 
926

 
2,514

 

 
3,440

 
(651
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Thorntons Oil
 
Summit
 
IL
 

 
2,233

 
109

 

 
2,342

 
(30
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Thorntons Oil
 
Waukegan
 
IL
 

 
875

 
1,421

 

 
2,296

 
(330
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999

F-183



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Thorntons Oil
 
Westmont
 
IL
 

 
760

 
3,069

 

 
3,829

 
(677
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Thorntons Oil
 
Clarksville
 
IN
 

 
1,319

 
687

 

 
2,006

 
(189
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Thorntons Oil
 
Edinburgh
 
IN
 

 
685

 
1,505

 

 
2,190

 
(352
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Thorntons Oil
 
Evansville
 
IN
 

 
467

 
1,479

 

 
1,946

 
(352
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1987
Thorntons Oil
 
Evansville
 
IN
 

 
602

 
1,398

 

 
2,000

 
(330
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Thorntons Oil
 
Jeffersonville
 
IN
 

 
1,233

 
1,533

 

 
2,766

 
(387
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Thorntons Oil
 
Terre Haute
 
IN
 

 
732

 
1,829

 

 
2,561

 
(441
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Thorntons Oil
 
Henderson
 
KY
 

 
659

 
3,271

 

 
3,930

 
(755
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1971
Thorntons Oil
 
Henderson
 
KY
 

 
483

 
1,778

 

 
2,261

 
(375
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Thorntons Oil
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
637

 
1,680

 

 
2,317

 
(351
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Thorntons Oil
 
Shelbyville
 
KY
 

 
299

 
2,036

 

 
2,335

 
(453
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Thorntons Oil
 
Galloway
 
OH
 

 
547

 
1,550

 

 
2,097

 
(349
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Tiffany & Co.
 
Parsippany
 
NJ
 

 
2,248

 
81,081

 

 
83,329

 
(20,402
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1997
Tilted Kilt
 
Hendersonville
 
TN
 

 
310

 
763

 

 
1,073

 
(195
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Time Warner Cable
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
3,081

 
22,512

 
979

 
26,572

 
(5,077
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2001
Tire Kingdom
 
Auburndale
 
FL
 
1,204

 
609

 
1,571

 

 
2,180

 
(334
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tire Kingdom
 
Dublin
 
OH
 

 
373

 
1,119

 

 
1,492

 
(353
)
 
4/30/2012
 
2003
Tire Kingdom
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
499

 
1,367

 

 
1,866

 
(301
)
 
3/28/2014
 
1997
Tire Warehouse
 
Fitchburg
 
MA
 

 
203

 
704

 

 
907

 
(180
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
Tire Warehouse
 
Bangor
 
ME
 

 
289

 
1,400

 

 
1,689

 
(357
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1977
Tires Plus
 
Duluth
 
GA
 

 
777

 
1,259

 

 
2,036

 
(287
)
 
2/21/2014
 
2001
TitleMax
 
Gainesville
 
GA
 

 
221

 
270

 

 
491

 
(72
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2007
TJ Maxx
 
Philadelphia
 
PA
 

 
9,889

 
84,953

 

 
94,842

 
(21,376
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2001
T-Mobile
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
1,190

 
15,847

 

 
17,037

 
(3,356
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2002
Toys R Us
 
Coral Springs
 
FL
 

 
4,264

 
5,289

 

 
9,553

 
(1,031
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Oneonta
 
AL
 

 
359

 
1,438

 

 
1,797

 
(323
)
 
4/18/2013
 
1983
Tractor Supply
 
Summerdale
 
AL
 
1,171

 
276

 
2,470

 

 
2,746

 
(427
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Tuscaloosa
 
AL
 

 
746

 
1,979

 

 
2,725

 
(341
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Tractor Supply
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 
1,500

 
930

 
2,035

 

 
2,965

 
(350
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Auburn
 
CA
 

 
1,175

 
2,901

 

 
4,076

 
(516
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Tractor Supply
 
Dixon
 
CA
 
2,962

 
1,619

 
4,044

 

 
5,663

 
(725
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Tractor Supply
 
Jackson
 
CA
 

 
1,209

 
3,640

 

 
4,849

 
(618
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012

F-184



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Tractor Supply
 
Los Banos
 
CA
 
3,468

 
1,213

 
3,638

 

 
4,851

 
(845
)
 
2/28/2013
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Buena Vista
 
CO
 

 
646

 
2,974

 

 
3,620

 
(49
)
 
6/16/2017
 
2014
Tractor Supply
 
Middletown
 
DE
 

 
1,487

 
3,293

 

 
4,780

 
(548
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Tractor Supply
 
Mims
 
FL
 

 
310

 
2,787

 

 
3,097

 
(559
)
 
10/10/2013
 
2012
Tractor Supply
 
Bainbridge
 
GA
 

 
687

 
2,445

 

 
3,132

 
(404
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Tractor Supply
 
Rincon
 
GA
 

 
978

 
2,016

 

 
2,994

 
(335
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Tractor Supply
 
Alton
 
IL
 
1,404

 
565

 
3,062

 
59

 
3,686

 
(519
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Tractor Supply
 
Mishawaka
 
IN
 

 
620

 
2,683

 

 
3,303

 
(457
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Tractor Supply
 
Sellersburg
 
IN
 
1,433

 
762

 
2,146

 

 
2,908

 
(378
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
St. John
 
IN
 
2,247

 
1,715

 
3,397

 

 
5,112

 
(614
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Tractor Supply
 
Lawrence
 
KS
 
1,377

 
361

 
2,637

 

 
2,998

 
(458
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Topeka
 
KS
 

 
446

 
1,785

 

 
2,231

 
(387
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2006
Tractor Supply
 
Glasgow
 
KY
 

 
453

 
1,812

 

 
2,265

 
(387
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2005
Tractor Supply
 
Grayson
 
KY
 

 
540

 
2,709

 

 
3,249

 
(468
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Tractor Supply
 
Paducah
 
KY
 

 
393

 
1,574

 

 
1,967

 
(345
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1995
Tractor Supply
 
Gray
 
LA
 
2,048

 
550

 
2,202

 

 
2,752

 
(553
)
 
8/7/2012
 
2011
Tractor Supply
 
Belchertown
 
MA
 
1,823

 
1,148

 
3,179

 

 
4,327

 
(570
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Millbury
 
MA
 

 
806

 
3,094

 

 
3,900

 
(500
)
 
6/26/2014
 
2013
Tractor Supply
 
Southwick
 
MA
 
2,428

 
1,601

 
3,583

 

 
5,184

 
(639
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Tractor Supply
 
Augusta
 
ME
 
1,423

 
530

 
2,756

 

 
3,286

 
(490
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Jonesville
 
MI
 

 
267

 
2,364

 

 
2,631

 
(447
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2005
Tractor Supply
 
Negaunee
 
MI
 

 
488

 
1,953

 

 
2,441

 
(501
)
 
6/12/2012
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Jefferson City
 
MO
 
1,125

 
490

 
1,877

 

 
2,367

 
(321
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Nixa
 
MO
 
1,346

 
476

 
2,040

 

 
2,516

 
(359
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Sedalia
 
MO
 
1,090

 
480

 
1,782

 

 
2,262

 
(321
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Troy
 
MO
 
1,286

 
730

 
2,587

 

 
3,317

 
(438
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Union
 
MO
 
1,404

 
589

 
3,012

 
13

 
3,614

 
(499
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Tractor Supply
 
Franklin
 
NC
 
1,479

 
434

 
2,629

 

 
3,063

 
(455
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Murphy
 
NC
 
1,402

 
990

 
2,090

 

 
3,080

 
(378
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
York
 
NE
 

 
326

 
2,452

 

 
2,778

 
(10
)
 
11/3/2017
 
2017
Tractor Supply
 
Plaistow
 
NH
 

 
638

 
2,552

 

 
3,190

 
(512
)
 
10/10/2013
 
2012

F-185



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Tractor Supply
 
Plymouth
 
NH
 
2,074

 
424

 
2,430

 
16

 
2,870

 
(586
)
 
11/29/2012
 
2011
Tractor Supply
 
Allentown
 
NJ
 

 
697

 
3,949

 

 
4,646

 
(1,069
)
 
1/27/2012
 
2008
Tractor Supply
 
Sicklerville
 
NJ
 

 
1,931

 
4,302

 

 
6,233

 
(720
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Farmington
 
NM
 

 
1,091

 
2,194

 

 
3,285

 
(415
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2012
Tractor Supply
 
Roswell
 
NM
 

 
947

 
2,181

 

 
3,128

 
(382
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Silver City
 
NM
 

 
716

 
2,380

 

 
3,096

 
(450
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2012
Tractor Supply
 
Macedon
 
NY
 

 
168

 
1,591

 

 
1,759

 
(295
)
 
4/29/2014
 
1992
Tractor Supply
 
Hamilton
 
OH
 
932

 
675

 
1,472

 

 
2,147

 
(368
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1975
Tractor Supply
 
Wauseon
 
OH
 
1,374

 
931

 
2,128

 

 
3,059

 
(390
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Tractor Supply
 
Chickasha
 
OK
 

 
599

 
2,056

 
538

 
3,193

 
(418
)
 
3/28/2014
 
2014
Tractor Supply
 
Glenpool
 
OK
 
1,180

 
359

 
2,447

 

 
2,806

 
(415
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Stillwater
 
OK
 
1,205

 
205

 
2,715

 

 
2,920

 
(458
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Gibsonia
 
PA
 
1,648

 
1,044

 
2,778

 

 
3,822

 
(488
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
952

 
2,222

 

 
3,174

 
(370
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Tractor Supply
 
Irmo
 
SC
 

 
725

 
2,171

 
62

 
2,958

 
(382
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Ballinger
 
TX
 
1,248

 
476

 
2,477

 

 
2,953

 
(407
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Del Rio
 
TX
 

 
927

 
2,044

 

 
2,971

 
(346
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Edinburg
 
TX
 

 
768

 
3,163

 

 
3,931

 
(516
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Kenedy
 
TX
 
1,180

 
309

 
2,372

 

 
2,681

 
(388
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Tractor Supply
 
Pearsall
 
TX
 
1,161

 
318

 
2,551

 

 
2,869

 
(422
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Tractor Supply
 
Rio Grande
 
TX
 

 
469

 
1,095

 

 
1,564

 
(281
)
 
6/19/2012
 
1993
Tractor Supply
 
Woodstock
 
VA
 

 
524

 
2,098

 

 
2,622

 
(436
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2004
Tractor Supply
 
Romney
 
WV
 

 
418

 
3,097

 

 
3,515

 
(11
)
 
11/29/2017
 
2017
Trader Joe's
 
Sarasota
 
FL
 

 
1,646

 
5,416

 

 
7,062

 
(1,108
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Trader Joe's
 
Lexington
 
KY
 

 
2,287

 
3,795

 

 
6,082

 
(811
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Tumbleweed
 
Terre Haute
 
IN
 

 
434

 
1,303

 

 
1,737

 
(346
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Tumbleweed
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
468

 
1,404

 

 
1,872

 
(372
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Tumbleweed
 
Mayesville
 
KY
 

 
353

 
823

 

 
1,176

 
(218
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Tumbleweed
 
Owensboro
 
KY
 

 
355

 
1,420

 

 
1,775

 
(377
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997
Tumbleweed
 
Bellefontaine
 
OH
 

 
234

 
938

 

 
1,172

 
(249
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Tumbleweed
 
Springfield
 
OH
 

 
549

 
1,280

 

 
1,829

 
(340
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Tumbleweed
 
Wooster
 
OH
 

 
342

 
799

 

 
1,141

 
(212
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997

F-186



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Tumbleweed
 
Zanesville
 
OH
 

 
639

 
1,491

 

 
2,130

 
(395
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Tutor Time
 
Downingtown
 
PA
 

 
205

 
2,788

 

 
2,993

 
(562
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Tutor Time
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
417

 
1,861

 

 
2,278

 
(396
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Ulta Salon
 
Jonesboro
 
AR
 

 
742

 
2,289

 

 
3,031

 
(422
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2013
Ulta Salon
 
Fort Gratiot
 
MI
 

 
164

 
2,083

 

 
2,247

 
(396
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Ulta Salon
 
Jackson
 
TN
 
1,454

 
547

 
2,123

 

 
2,670

 
(400
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
United Buffet and Grille
 
Hagerstown
 
MD
 

 
244

 
1,306

 
(1,505
)
 
45

 
(12
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2001
United Technologies
 
Bradenton
 
FL
 
10,050

 
2,692

 
17,973

 

 
20,665

 
(2,969
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
University Plaza
 
Flagstaff
 
AZ
 

 
4,727

 
18,087

 
491

 
23,305

 
(4,505
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1982
The UPS Store
 
Elizabethtown
 
KY
 

 
1,460

 
10,336

 
778

 
12,574

 
(2,686
)
 
9/24/2013
 
2001
US Bank
 
Alsip
 
IL
 

 
226

 
1,280

 

 
1,506

 
(445
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1981
US Bank
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
267

 
1,511

 

 
1,778

 
(526
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1923
US Bank
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
191

 
1,082

 

 
1,273

 
(376
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1979
US Bank
 
Chicago Heights
 
IL
 

 
182

 
1,637

 

 
1,819

 
(435
)
 
1/24/2013
 
1996
US Bank
 
Elmwood Park
 
IL
 

 
431

 
2,441

 

 
2,872

 
(815
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1984
US Bank
 
Evergreen Park
 
IL
 

 
167

 
944

 

 
1,111

 
(329
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1984
US Bank
 
Lyons
 
IL
 

 
214

 
1,212

 

 
1,426

 
(422
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1959
US Bank
 
Orland Hills
 
IL
 
2,646

 
1,253

 
2,327

 

 
3,580

 
(626
)
 
12/14/2012
 
1995
US Bank
 
Westchester
 
IL
 

 
366

 
853

 

 
1,219

 
(223
)
 
2/22/2013
 
1986
US Bank
 
Wilmington
 
IL
 

 
330

 
1,872

 

 
2,202

 
(615
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1966
US Bank
 
Fayetteville
 
NC
 

 
608

 
1,741

 

 
2,349

 
(322
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
US Bank
 
Garfield Height
 
OH
 

 
165

 
1,016

 

 
1,181

 
(243
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1958
VA Clinic
 
Oceanside
 
CA
 
27,749

 
9,489

 
33,812

 
105

 
43,406

 
(6,015
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Vacant
 
Andalusia
 
AL
 

 
94

 
251

 

 
345

 
(65
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2004
Vacant
 
Jasper
 
AL
 

 
577

 
2,545

 
(2,786
)
 
336

 
(34
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Vacant
 
Mobile
 
AL
 

 
127

 
276

 
(162
)
 
241

 
(18
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1974
Vacant
 
Tuscaloosa
 
AL
 

 
244

 
1,306

 
(1,549
)
 
1

 

 
1/8/2014
 
2001
Vacant
 
Arkadelphia
 
AR
 

 
225

 
633

 
(595
)
 
263

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1990
Vacant
 
Pine Bluff
 
AR
 

 
105

 
433

 
(409
)
 
129

 
(16
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Vacant
 
Searcy
 
AR
 

 
231

 
1,286

 
(1,318
)
 
199

 
(30
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Vacant
 
Fountain Hills
 
AZ
 

 
241

 
597

 
(228
)
 
610

 
(13
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Vacant
 
Peoria
 
AZ
 

 
837

 
1,953

 
(1,552
)
 
1,238

 
(28
)
 
2/27/2013
 
1996

F-187



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Vacant
 
Fresno
 
CA
 

 
190

 
1,810

 
(1,249
)
 
751

 
(167
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Gilroy
 
CA
 

 
249

 
986

 
(1,235
)
 

 

 
1/8/2014
 
2002
Vacant
 
San Luis Obispo
 
CA
 

 
195

 
1,013

 
(844
)
 
364

 
(61
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2000
Vacant
 
Santee
 
CA
 

 
265

 
1,261

 
(1,390
)
 
136

 
(27
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1995
Vacant
 
Vacaville
 
CA
 

 
195

 
1,044

 
(1,238
)
 
1

 

 
1/8/2014
 
2000
Vacant
 
Highlands Ranch
 
CO
 
3,475

 
2,850

 
4,795

 

 
7,645

 
(947
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Vacant
 
Lone Tree
 
CO
 

 
196

 
1,014

 
(1,070
)
 
140

 
(23
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1995
Vacant
 
New London
 
CT
 

 
94

 
534

 
(448
)
 
180

 
(2
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Vacant
 
Smyrna
 
DE
 

 
183

 
1,036

 
(994
)
 
225

 
(5
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1995
Vacant
 
Cocoa
 
FL
 

 
249

 
567

 

 
816

 
(143
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1979
Vacant
 
Davie
 
FL
 

 
193

 
1,009

 
(1,201
)
 
1

 

 
1/8/2014
 
1989
Vacant
 
Lake Wales
 
FL
 

 
671

 
671

 

 
1,342

 
(172
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1988
Vacant
 
Melbourne
 
FL
 

 
464

 
1,392

 

 
1,856

 
(351
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1987
Vacant
 
Pinellas Park
 
FL
 
16,200

 
4,538

 
23,842

 
(17,726
)
 
10,654

 
(810
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2001
Vacant
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
828

 
1,933

 

 
2,761

 
(488
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1991
Vacant
 
Titusville
 
FL
 

 
528

 
239

 

 
767

 
(60
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Vacant
 
Bowdon
 
GA
 

 
416

 
1,247

 
(1,457
)
 
206

 
(2
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1900
Vacant
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
1,307

 
2,529

 
(2,876
)
 
960

 
(66
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Vacant
 
Dawson
 
GA
 

 
131

 
274

 
(182
)
 
223

 
(16
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Vacant
 
Stockbridge
 
GA
 

 
422

 
2,391

 
(2,428
)
 
385

 
(15
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Vacant
 
Mason City
 
IA
 

 
290

 
1,255

 
(192
)
 
1,353

 
(175
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Joliet
 
IL
 

 
1,834

 
1,585

 

 
3,419

 
(415
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Vacant
 
Lombard
 
IL
 

 
84

 
100

 

 
184

 
(26
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1973
Vacant
 
Merrillville
 
IN
 

 
511

 
4,768

 

 
5,279

 
(1,042
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
Vacant
 
London
 
KY
 

 
370

 
1,493

 
(666
)
 
1,197

 
(47
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Nicholasville
 
KY
 

 
435

 
2,040

 
(939
)
 
1,536

 
(146
)
 
6/11/2014
 
2001
Vacant
 
Bossier City
 
LA
 

 
1,168

 
2,594

 
(2,882
)
 
880

 
(75
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Vacant
 
Detroit
 
MI
 

 
204

 
1,159

 
(1,248
)
 
115

 
(2
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1956
Vacant
 
Grosse Pointe Woods
 
MI
 

 
140

 
1,046

 
(785
)
 
401

 
(54
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Harper Woods
 
MI
 

 
207

 
1,171

 
(953
)
 
425

 
(5
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1982
Vacant
 
Highland Park
 
MI
 

 
150

 
848

 
(637
)
 
361

 
(4
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1967
Vacant
 
Ypsilanti
 
MI
 

 
85

 
483

 
(208
)
 
360

 

 
11/23/2011
 
2002

F-188



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Vacant
 
Blue Springs
 
MO
 

 
810

 
1,346

 
(1,515
)
 
641

 
(62
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Chesterfield
 
MO
 

 
1,537

 
4,123

 

 
5,660

 
(904
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Vacant
 
Joplin
 
MO
 

 
314

 
1,610

 

 
1,924

 
(359
)
 
2/11/2014
 
1984
Vacant
 
Joplin
 
MO
 

 
127

 
300

 

 
427

 
(89
)
 
2/11/2014
 
1973
Vacant
 
Pearl
 
MS
 

 
1,058

 
1,857

 
(1,893
)
 
1,022

 
(83
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Vacant
 
Albemarle
 
NC
 

 
483

 
457

 
(493
)
 
447

 
(33
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Burlington
 
NC
 

 
446

 
545

 
(403
)
 
588

 
(19
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Monroe
 
NC
 

 
204

 
1,837

 
(1,319
)
 
722

 
(61
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1920
Vacant
 
Oakboro
 
NC
 

 
360

 
540

 
(605
)
 
295

 
(2
)
 
7/23/2013
 
1970
Vacant
 
Yadkinville
 
NC
 

 
200

 
371

 
(368
)
 
203

 
(10
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1975
Vacant
 
Zebulon
 
NC
 

 
515

 
630

 
(680
)
 
465

 
(3
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1972
Vacant
 
Flanders
 
NJ
 
915

 
1,468

 
883

 

 
2,351

 
(175
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Vacant
 
Mt. Laurel
 
NJ
 
1,447

 
1,332

 
1,792

 

 
3,124

 
(286
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Vacant
 
Hobbs
 
NM
 

 
815

 

 
(543
)
 
272

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
East Greenbush
 
NY
 

 
404

 
269

 
(241
)
 
432

 
(5
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Vacant
 
Elmira
 
NY
 

 
199

 
370

 
(441
)
 
128

 
(4
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1975
Vacant
 
Greene
 
NY
 

 
216

 
1,227

 
(1,068
)
 
375

 
(7
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1981
Vacant
 
Schenectady
 
NY
 

 
292

 
1,655

 
(847
)
 
1,100

 
(19
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1974
Vacant
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
353

 
824

 
(572
)
 
605

 
(5
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1969
Vacant
 
Englewood
 
OH
 

 
547

 

 
(384
)
 
163

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1974
Vacant
 
Massillon
 
OH
 

 
212

 
1,202

 
(1,008
)
 
406

 
(5
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1958
Vacant
 
Mentor
 
OH
 

 
178

 
1,011

 

 
1,189

 
(352
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1976
Vacant
 
Moraine
 
OH
 

 
87

 
148

 

 
235

 
(28
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Youngstown
 
OH
 

 
139

 
232

 
(37
)
 
334

 
(32
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Vacant
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
530

 
1,174

 
225

 
1,929

 
(300
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
The Dalles
 
OR
 

 
201

 
802

 
(486
)
 
517

 
(172
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Vacant
 
Grants Pass
 
OR
 

 
393

 
2,979

 

 
3,372

 
(674
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1963
Vacant
 
Beaver Falls
 
PA
 

 
243

 
1,304

 
(1,489
)
 
58

 
(9
)
 
1/8/2014
 
2004
Vacant
 
Indiana
 
PA
 

 
676

 
1,255

 
(920
)
 
1,011

 
(105
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Vacant
 
North Fayette
 
PA
 

 
1,990

 
2,700

 

 
4,690

 
(521
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Vacant
 
Lexington
 
SC
 

 
244

 
1,307

 
(1,356
)
 
195

 
(37
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1998
Vacant
 
North Charleston
 
SC
 

 
2,193

 
4,636

 

 
6,829

 
(1,025
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008

F-189



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Vacant
 
Travelers Rest
 
SC
 

 
746

 
746

 
(990
)
 
502

 
(11
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
La Vergne
 
TN
 

 
171

 
209

 

 
380

 
(54
)
 
3/22/2013
 
1985
Vacant
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
100

 
283

 
167

 
550

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Sevierville
 
TN
 

 
1,443

 
430

 
(751
)
 
1,122

 
(66
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Vacant
 
Abilene
 
TX
 

 
803

 

 

 
803

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Amarillo
 
TX
 

 
993

 
2,317

 
(1,848
)
 
1,462

 
(84
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Vacant
 
Austin
 
TX
 

 
837

 
1,797

 

 
2,634

 
(468
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Vacant
 
Bay City
 
TX
 

 
229

 
124

 
(220
)
 
133

 
(5
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Vacant
 
Dallas
 
TX
 

 
810

 
1,656

 

 
2,466

 
(423
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Grand Prairie
 
TX
 

 
997

 
2,327

 

 
3,324

 
(617
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Vacant
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
900

 
1,749

 

 
2,649

 
(447
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
980

 
2,284

 
(1,575
)
 
1,689

 
(76
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Irving
 
TX
 

 
522

 
512

 
(235
)
 
799

 
(52
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
694

 

 
(301
)
 
393

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1979
Vacant
 
Plano
 
TX
 

 
540

 
1,060

 

 
1,600

 
(271
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
San Angelo
 
TX
 

 
769

 
2,306

 

 
3,075

 
(612
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Vacant
 
Texas City
 
TX
 

 
614

 
3,351

 
(2,351
)
 
1,614

 
(149
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Vacant
 
Midlothian
 
VA
 

 
230

 
1,300

 
(861
)
 
669

 
(27
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Vacant
 
Norfolk
 
VA
 

 
656

 
437

 

 
1,093

 
(110
)
 
4/12/2013
 
1990
Vacant
 
Poultney
 
VT
 

 
149

 
847

 
(777
)
 
219

 
(1
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1860
Vacant
 
White River Junction
 
VT
 

 
183

 
1,039

 
(836
)
 
386

 
(2
)
 
8/1/2010
 
1975
Vacant
 
Schofield
 
WI
 

 
106

 
196

 

 
302

 
(46
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Vanguard Car Rental
 
College Park
 
GA
 

 
1,561

 
6,244

 

 
7,805

 
(1,649
)
 
5/19/2014
 
2002
Velox Insurance
 
Woodstock
 
GA
 

 
155

 
127

 

 
282

 
(34
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1988
Verizon Wireless
 
Statesville
 
NC
 

 
207

 
459

 
27

 
693

 
(118
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
The Vitamin Shoppe
 
Evergreen Park
 
IL
 

 
476

 
1,427

 

 
1,903

 
(377
)
 
4/19/2013
 
2012
The Vitamin Shoppe
 
Ashland
 
VA
 

 
2,399

 
19,663

 

 
22,062

 
(4,948
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2013
Volusia Square
 
Daytona Beach
 
FL
 
16,557

 
4,598

 
28,511

 
269

 
33,378

 
(5,881
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1986
Waffle House
 
Cocoa
 
FL
 

 
150

 
279

 

 
429

 
(66
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Walgreens
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 
1,509

 
996

 
3,005

 

 
4,001

 
(700
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Walgreens
 
Wetumpka
 
AL
 

 
547

 
3,102

 

 
3,649

 
(1,012
)
 
2/22/2012
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Kingman
 
AZ
 
2,902

 
669

 
5,726

 

 
6,395

 
(1,230
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009

F-190



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Walgreens
 
Phoenix
 
AZ
 

 
1,037

 
1,927

 

 
2,964

 
(554
)
 
3/26/2013
 
1999
Walgreens
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 

 
1,234

 
5,143

 

 
6,377

 
(1,102
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Walgreens
 
Tucson
 
AZ
 
2,910

 
1,406

 
3,571

 

 
4,977

 
(782
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Walgreens
 
Coalinga
 
CA
 
2,800

 
396

 
3,568

 

 
3,964

 
(1,200
)
 
10/11/2011
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Lancaster
 
CA
 
2,719

 
859

 
4,246

 

 
5,105

 
(996
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Castle Rock
 
CO
 
3,953

 
1,581

 
3,689

 

 
5,270

 
(987
)
 
7/11/2013
 
2002
Walgreens
 
Denver
 
CO
 
3,350

 

 
4,050

 

 
4,050

 
(1,083
)
 
7/2/2013
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Pueblo
 
CO
 

 
519

 
2,971

 

 
3,490

 
(645
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Walgreens
 
Orlando
 
FL
 

 
1,007

 
1,869

 

 
2,876

 
(481
)
 
9/30/2013
 
1996
Walgreens
 
Acworth
 
GA
 

 
1,583

 
2,940

 

 
4,523

 
(875
)
 
1/25/2013
 
2012
Walgreens
 
Decatur
 
GA
 

 
1,746

 
3,337

 

 
5,083

 
(724
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Walgreens
 
Grayson
 
GA
 
2,720

 
947

 
3,747

 

 
4,694

 
(800
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Walgreens
 
Union City
 
GA
 

 
909

 
3,841

 

 
4,750

 
(818
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Walgreens
 
Dubuque
 
IA
 

 
638

 
3,905

 

 
4,543

 
(830
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Twin Falls
 
ID
 
2,355

 
1,156

 
3,896

 

 
5,052

 
(871
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Cahokia
 
IL
 

 
394

 
1,577

 
167

 
2,138

 
(417
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1994
Walgreens
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
1,212

 
2,829

 

 
4,041

 
(842
)
 
1/30/2013
 
1999
Walgreens
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
1,617

 
3,003

 

 
4,620

 
(893
)
 
1/30/2013
 
1995
Walgreens
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
952

 
3,235

 

 
4,187

 
(687
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Walgreens
 
Chicago
 
IL
 

 
911

 
4,830

 

 
5,741

 
(1,000
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Walgreens
 
Machesney Park
 
IL
 

 
822

 
3,727

 

 
4,549

 
(809
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Matteson
 
IL
 
2,450

 
416

 
4,070

 

 
4,486

 
(829
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
South Elgin
 
IL
 
2,189

 
1,710

 
3,208

 

 
4,918

 
(709
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Walgreens
 
St. Charles
 
IL
 
1,964

 
1,472

 
3,262

 

 
4,734

 
(691
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Walgreens
 
Anderson
 
IN
 

 
807

 
3,227

 

 
4,034

 
(1,012
)
 
7/31/2012
 
2001
Walgreens
 
Lafayette
 
IN
 
2,350

 
626

 
4,183

 

 
4,809

 
(801
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
South Bend
 
IN
 
3,022

 
1,240

 
5,014

 

 
6,254

 
(1,112
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Walgreens
 
Frankfort
 
KY
 

 
911

 
3,643

 

 
4,554

 
(1,189
)
 
2/8/2012
 
2006
Walgreens
 
Shereveport
 
LA
 

 
619

 
3,509

 

 
4,128

 
(1,145
)
 
2/22/2012
 
2003
Walgreens
 
Framingham
 
MA
 
2,951

 
2,103

 
4,770

 

 
6,873

 
(1,005
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Baltimore
 
MD
 

 
1,185

 
2,764

 

 
3,949

 
(726
)
 
8/6/2013
 
2000
Walgreens
 
Brooklyn Park
 
MD
 

 
1,416

 
4,160

 

 
5,576

 
(874
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008

F-191



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Walgreens
 
Augusta
 
ME
 
3,058

 
1,648

 
5,146

 

 
6,794

 
(1,157
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Clarkston
 
MI
 

 
2,768

 
3,197

 

 
5,965

 
(699
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Walgreens
 
Clinton
 
MI
 

 
1,463

 
3,413

 

 
4,876

 
(1,037
)
 
11/13/2012
 
2002
Walgreens
 
Dearborn Heights
 
MI
 

 
190

 
3,605

 

 
3,795

 
(1,018
)
 
4/1/2013
 
1998
Walgreens
 
Eastpointe
 
MI
 

 
668

 
2,672

 

 
3,340

 
(878
)
 
1/19/2012
 
1998
Walgreens
 
Lincoln Park
 
MI
 
5,494

 
1,041

 
5,896

 

 
6,937

 
(1,850
)
 
7/31/2012
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Livonia
 
MI
 

 
261

 
2,350

 

 
2,611

 
(664
)
 
4/1/2013
 
1998
Walgreens
 
Stevensville
 
MI
 
3,099

 
855

 
3,420

 

 
4,275

 
(1,141
)
 
11/28/2011
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Troy
 
MI
 

 

 
1,896

 

 
1,896

 
(571
)
 
12/12/2012
 
2000
Walgreens
 
Warren
 
MI
 

 
748

 
2,990

 

 
3,738

 
(908
)
 
11/21/2012
 
1999
Walgreens
 
North Mankato
 
MN
 
2,451

 
1,748

 
3,604

 

 
5,352

 
(795
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Country Club Hills
 
MO
 

 
997

 
4,204

 

 
5,201

 
(841
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Columbia
 
MS
 

 
452

 
4,072

 

 
4,524

 
(1,227
)
 
12/21/2012
 
2011
Walgreens
 
Greenwood
 
MS
 

 
561

 
3,181

 

 
3,742

 
(1,038
)
 
2/22/2012
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Cape Carteret
 
NC
 
2,400

 
919

 
3,087

 

 
4,006

 
(667
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Durham
 
NC
 
2,871

 
1,441

 
3,581

 

 
5,022

 
(863
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Walgreens
 
Durham
 
NC
 
2,760

 
2,201

 
2,923

 

 
5,124

 
(765
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Laurinburg
 
NC
 

 
355

 
3,577

 

 
3,932

 
(819
)
 
2/26/2014
 
2013
Walgreens
 
Leland
 
NC
 
2,472

 
1,226

 
3,681

 

 
4,907

 
(818
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Rocky Mount
 
NC
 
2,899

 
1,105

 
4,046

 

 
5,151

 
(994
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Winterville
 
NC
 
2,931

 
578

 
5,322

 

 
5,900

 
(1,214
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
North Platte
 
NE
 

 
935

 
4,291

 

 
5,226

 
(958
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Omaha
 
NE
 
2,496

 
1,316

 
4,122

 

 
5,438

 
(910
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Papillion
 
NE
 

 
1,239

 
3,212

 

 
4,451

 
(696
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Maplewood
 
NJ
 
4,700

 
1,071

 
6,071

 

 
7,142

 
(2,026
)
 
11/18/2011
 
2011

F-192



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Walgreens
 
Albuquerque
 
NM
 

 
1,173

 
2,287

 

 
3,460

 
(506
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1996
Walgreens
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 
6,566

 
1,528

 
6,114

 

 
7,642

 
(1,949
)
 
5/30/2012
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
700

 
2,801

 

 
3,501

 
(791
)
 
4/30/2013
 
2001
Walgreens
 
Lockport
 
NY
 

 
2,358

 
2,301

 

 
4,659

 
(514
)
 
4/21/2014
 
1998
Walgreens
 
Staten Island
 
NY
 
3,081

 

 
3,984

 

 
3,984

 
(1,340
)
 
10/5/2011
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Watertown
 
NY
 

 
2,937

 
2,664

 

 
5,601

 
(593
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Walgreens
 
Akron
 
OH
 
1,684

 
664

 
1,548

 
71

 
2,283

 
(430
)
 
5/31/2013
 
1994
Walgreens
 
Bryan
 
OH
 

 
219

 
4,154

 

 
4,373

 
(1,355
)
 
2/22/2012
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 

 
472

 
1,890

 
68

 
2,430

 
(417
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1994
Walgreens
 
Cleveland
 
OH
 
2,608

 
743

 
4,757

 

 
5,500

 
(1,057
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Eaton
 
OH
 
3,067

 
398

 
3,586

 

 
3,984

 
(1,134
)
 
6/27/2012
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Medina
 
OH
 

 
820

 
4,585

 

 
5,405

 
(961
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Walgreens
 
New Albany
 
OH
 

 
919

 
3,424

 

 
4,343

 
(716
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2006
Walgreens
 
Edmond
 
OK
 
2,240

 
697

 
4,287

 

 
4,984

 
(929
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Walgreens
 
Stillwater
 
OK
 

 
368

 
4,368

 
87

 
4,823

 
(941
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Walgreens
 
Tahlequah
 
OK
 

 
647

 
3,664

 

 
4,311

 
(1,090
)
 
1/2/2013
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
1,147

 
2,904

 

 
4,051

 
(629
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Walgreens
 
Aibonito Pueblo
 
PR
 
5,695

 
1,855

 
5,566

 

 
7,421

 
(1,600
)
 
3/5/2013
 
2012
Walgreens
 
Las Piedras
 
PR
 
5,293

 
1,726

 
5,179

 

 
6,905

 
(1,463
)
 
4/3/2013
 
1995
Walgreens
 
Anderson
 
SC
 

 
835

 
3,342

 

 
4,177

 
(1,090
)
 
2/8/2012
 
2006
Walgreens
 
Easley
 
SC
 
3,686

 
1,206

 
3,617

 

 
4,823

 
(1,144
)
 
6/27/2012
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Fort Mill
 
SC
 
2,180

 
1,300

 
2,760

 
(232
)
 
3,828

 
(671
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Walgreens
 
Greenville
 
SC
 
3,991

 
1,313

 
3,940

 

 
5,253

 
(1,246
)
 
6/27/2012
 
2006
Walgreens
 
Lancaster
 
SC
 
2,882

 
1,941

 
3,526

 

 
5,467

 
(867
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Myrtle Beach
 
SC
 

 

 
2,077

 

 
2,077

 
(688
)
 
12/29/2011
 
2001
Walgreens
 
N. Charleston
 
SC
 
3,379

 
1,320

 
3,081

 

 
4,401

 
(974
)
 
6/27/2012
 
2007
Walgreens
 
Spearfish
 
SD
 

 
1,116

 
4,158

 

 
5,274

 
(909
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Bartlett
 
TN
 

 
2,358

 
2,194

 

 
4,552

 
(472
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Walgreens
 
Cordova
 
TN
 

 
1,005

 
2,345

 

 
3,350

 
(712
)
 
11/9/2012
 
2002
Walgreens
 
Memphis
 
TN
 

 
896

 
2,687

 

 
3,583

 
(823
)
 
10/2/2012
 
2003
Walgreens
 
Anthony
 
TX
 

 
644

 
4,369

 

 
5,013

 
(893
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Baytown
 
TX
 
2,399

 
953

 
4,298

 

 
5,251

 
(915
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009

F-193



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Walgreens
 
Denton
 
TX
 

 
1,184

 
3,726

 

 
4,910

 
(793
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
Walgreens
 
Houston
 
TX
 

 
491

 
1,965

 

 
2,456

 
(495
)
 
5/19/2014
 
1993
Walgreens
 
Fredericksburg
 
VA
 

 
2,320

 
3,789

 

 
6,109

 
(938
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Portsmouth
 
VA
 
1,215

 
730

 
3,311

 

 
4,041

 
(820
)
 
11/5/2013
 
1998
Walgreens
 
Appleton
 
WI
 
1,819

 
975

 
3,047

 

 
4,022

 
(666
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Appleton
 
WI
 
2,651

 
1,198

 
4,344

 

 
5,542

 
(955
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Beloit
 
WI
 
2,184

 
721

 
3,653

 

 
4,374

 
(808
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Janesville
 
WI
 

 
1,039

 
5,315

 

 
6,354

 
(1,155
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Walgreens
 
Janesville
 
WI
 
2,164

 
593

 
4,009

 

 
4,602

 
(867
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2010
Walgreens
 
Bridgeport
 
WV
 

 
1,315

 
3,176

 

 
4,491

 
(732
)
 
2/18/2014
 
2011
Wal-Mart
 
Pueblo
 
CO
 
8,249

 
2,586

 
12,512

 

 
15,098

 
(2,775
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Wal-Mart
 
Douglasville
 
GA
 

 
3,559

 
17,588

 

 
21,147

 
(3,623
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Wal-Mart
 
Valdosta
 
GA
 

 
3,909

 
9,447

 

 
13,356

 
(2,007
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1998
Wal-Mart
 
Cary
 
NC
 

 
2,314

 
5,549

 

 
7,863

 
(1,162
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2005
Wal-Mart
 
Albuquerque
 
NM
 

 
10,991

 

 

 
10,991

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Wal-Mart
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
17,038

 

 

 
17,038

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Wal-Mart
 
Lancaster
 
SC
 

 
2,714

 
11,677

 

 
14,391

 
(2,481
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Wal-Mart
 
Oneida
 
TN
 

 
1,803

 
8,580

 

 
10,383

 
(1,778
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Waste Connections
 
Weatherford
 
TX
 

 
102

 
3,386

 
(2,911
)
 
577

 
(104
)
 
6/12/2014
 
2011
WaWa
 
Gap
 
PA
 

 
561

 
5,054

 

 
5,615

 
(1,044
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
WaWa
 
Portsmouth
 
VA
 
1,241

 
1,573

 

 

 
1,573

 

 
2/7/2014
 
2008
Weir Oil and Gas
 
Williston
 
ND
 

 
273

 
6,232

 

 
6,505

 
(968
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2012
Wells Fargo
 
Bristol
 
PA
 

 
114

 
81

 

 
195

 
(24
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1818
Wells Fargo
 
Lebanon
 
PA
 

 
80

 
435

 
89

 
604

 
(100
)
 
1/8/2014
 
1995
Welspun Global Trade
 
Houston
 
TX
 
19,524

 
2,356

 
36,347

 
18

 
38,721

 
(7,309
)
 
11/5/2013
 
2009
Wendy's
 
Anniston
 
AL
 

 
454

 
591

 

 
1,045

 
(149
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Wendy's
 
Auburn
 
AL
 

 
718

 
1,333

 

 
2,051

 
(314
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2000
Wendy's
 
Birmingham
 
AL
 

 
562

 
990

 

 
1,552

 
(249
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2005
Wendy's
 
Homewood
 
AL
 

 
995

 

 

 
995

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Phenix City
 
AL
 

 
529

 
1,178

 

 
1,707

 
(297
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Batesville
 
AR
 

 
155

 
878

 

 
1,033

 
(206
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Benton
 
AR
 

 
478

 
1,018

 

 
1,496

 
(256
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993

F-194



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Bentonville
 
AR
 

 
648

 
708

 

 
1,356

 
(178
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Bryant
 
AR
 

 
529

 
575

 

 
1,104

 
(145
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Cabot
 
AR
 

 
524

 
707

 

 
1,231

 
(178
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1991
Wendy's
 
Conway
 
AR
 

 
478

 
594

 

 
1,072

 
(150
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Conway
 
AR
 

 
482

 
833

 

 
1,315

 
(210
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Fayetteville
 
AR
 

 
408

 
830

 

 
1,238

 
(209
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Fayetteville
 
AR
 

 
463

 
463

 

 
926

 
(109
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Fort Smith
 
AR
 

 
195

 
1,186

 
(11
)
 
1,370

 
(299
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Fort Smith
 
AR
 

 
63

 
1,016

 

 
1,079

 
(256
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
278

 
878

 

 
1,156

 
(221
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1976
Wendy's
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
990

 
623

 

 
1,613

 
(386
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
Wendy's
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
605

 
463

 

 
1,068

 
(117
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
501

 
500

 

 
1,001

 
(118
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
773

 
773

 

 
1,546

 
(182
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Little Rock
 
AR
 

 
532

 
650

 

 
1,182

 
(153
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Pine Bluff
 
AR
 

 
221

 
1,022

 

 
1,243

 
(257
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Rogers
 
AR
 

 
579

 
912

 

 
1,491

 
(230
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Russellville
 
AR
 

 
356

 
638

 

 
994

 
(160
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Springdale
 
AR
 

 
323

 
896

 

 
1,219

 
(225
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Springdale
 
AR
 

 
410

 
821

 

 
1,231

 
(207
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Stuttgart
 
AR
 

 
67

 
1,038

 

 
1,105

 
(261
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Van Buren
 
AR
 

 
197

 
748

 

 
945

 
(188
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Payson
 
AZ
 

 
679

 
829

 
(769
)
 
739

 
(5
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Camarillo
 
CA
 

 
320

 
2,253

 

 
2,573

 
(557
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Groton
 
CT
 

 
1,099

 
900

 

 
1,999

 
(212
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Norwich
 
CT
 

 
703

 
937

 

 
1,640

 
(236
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Orange
 
CT
 

 
1,343

 
1,641

 

 
2,984

 
(386
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Indialantic
 
FL
 

 
592

 
614

 

 
1,206

 
(155
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Lake Wales
 
FL
 

 
975

 
1,462

 

 
2,437

 
(344
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Lynn Haven
 
FL
 

 
446

 
852

 

 
1,298

 
(214
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Melbourne
 
FL
 

 
550

 
680

 

 
1,230

 
(171
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Merritt Island
 
FL
 

 
720

 
589

 

 
1,309

 
(139
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990

F-195



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
New Smyrna Beach
 
FL
 

 
476

 
394

 

 
870

 
(99
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1982
Wendy's
 
Ormond Beach
 
FL
 

 
626

 
561

 

 
1,187

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Ormond Beach
 
FL
 

 
503

 
503

 

 
1,006

 
(118
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Panama City
 
FL
 

 
461

 
529

 

 
990

 
(133
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Panama City
 
FL
 

 
445

 
837

 

 
1,282

 
(211
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
Port Orange
 
FL
 

 
695

 
569

 

 
1,264

 
(134
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
South Daytona
 
FL
 

 
531

 
432

 

 
963

 
(109
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
952

 
514

 

 
1,466

 
(129
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Tallahassee
 
FL
 

 
855

 
505

 

 
1,360

 
(127
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Titusville
 
FL
 

 
415

 
761

 

 
1,176

 
(192
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Titusville
 
FL
 

 
414

 
770

 

 
1,184

 
(181
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
Albany
 
GA
 

 
414

 
1,656

 

 
2,070

 
(389
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Albany
 
GA
 

 
383

 
748

 

 
1,131

 
(157
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Austell
 
GA
 

 
383

 
506

 

 
889

 
(127
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Brunswick
 
GA
 

 
306

 
435

 

 
741

 
(110
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
701

 
1,787

 

 
2,488

 
(450
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
743

 
1,184

 

 
1,927

 
(298
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1988
Wendy's
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
478

 
2,209

 

 
2,687

 
(556
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2003
Wendy's
 
Columbus
 
GA
 

 
223

 
1,380

 

 
1,603

 
(290
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1982
Wendy's
 
Douglasville
 
GA
 

 
605

 
776

 

 
1,381

 
(195
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Eastman
 
GA
 

 
258

 
473

 

 
731

 
(119
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
Fairburn
 
GA
 

 
1,076

 
1,316

 

 
2,392

 
(309
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Wendy's
 
Hogansville
 
GA
 

 
240

 
1,359

 

 
1,599

 
(320
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Lithia Springs
 
GA
 

 
668

 
774

 

 
1,442

 
(195
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1988
Wendy's
 
Morrow
 
GA
 

 
755

 
922

 

 
1,677

 
(217
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1990
Wendy's
 
Savannah
 
GA
 

 
720

 
720

 

 
1,440

 
(169
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Sharpsburg
 
GA
 

 
649

 
1,299

 

 
1,948

 
(327
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2002
Wendy's
 
Stockbridge
 
GA
 

 
480

 
558

 

 
1,038

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
Bourbonnais
 
IL
 

 
346

 
1,039

 

 
1,385

 
(244
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Joliet
 
IL
 

 
642

 
963

 

 
1,605

 
(227
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Kankakee
 
IL
 

 
250

 
1,419

 

 
1,669

 
(334
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Wendy's
 
Mokena
 
IL
 

 
665

 
997

 

 
1,662

 
(235
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1992

F-196



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Normal
 
IL
 

 
443

 
991

 

 
1,434

 
(208
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Anderson
 
IN
 

 
872

 
736

 

 
1,608

 
(185
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Anderson
 
IN
 

 
859

 
707

 

 
1,566

 
(178
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Anderson
 
IN
 

 
505

 
757

 

 
1,262

 
(178
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Anderson
 
IN
 

 
584

 
713

 

 
1,297

 
(168
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
Wendy's
 
Avon
 
IN
 

 
538

 
407

 

 
945

 
(127
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Wendy's
 
Avon
 
IN
 

 
638

 
330

 

 
968

 
(139
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Carmel
 
IN
 

 
736

 
211

 

 
947

 
(72
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Carmel
 
IN
 

 
915

 
178

 

 
1,093

 
(89
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Connersville
 
IN
 

 
324

 
1,298

 

 
1,622

 
(305
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Fishers
 
IN
 

 
855

 
147

 

 
1,002

 
(75
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Fishers
 
IN
 

 
761

 
229

 

 
990

 
(94
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2012
Wendy's
 
Greenfield
 
IN
 

 
429

 
214

 

 
643

 
(74
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Indianapolis
 
IN
 

 
751

 
212

 

 
963

 
(90
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Lebanon
 
IN
 

 
1,265

 
108

 

 
1,373

 
(67
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1979
Wendy's
 
Noblesville
 
IN
 

 
590

 
42

 

 
632

 
(19
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1988
Wendy's
 
Pendleton
 
IN
 

 
448

 
894

 

 
1,342

 
(225
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2005
Wendy's
 
Richmond
 
IN
 

 
735

 
1,716

 

 
2,451

 
(404
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Richmond
 
IN
 

 
661

 
992

 

 
1,653

 
(233
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Benton
 
KY
 

 
252

 
926

 

 
1,178

 
(194
)
 
3/26/2014
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
834

 
1,379

 

 
2,213

 
(347
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
532

 
1,221

 

 
1,753

 
(307
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Wendy's
 
Louisville
 
KY
 

 
857

 
1,420

 

 
2,277

 
(358
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Wendy's
 
Mayfield
 
KY
 

 
242

 
779

 

 
1,021

 
(164
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Baton Rouge
 
LA
 

 
316

 
782

 
(522
)
 
576

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Wendy's
 
Minden
 
LA
 

 
182

 
936

 

 
1,118

 
(236
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Worcester
 
MA
 

 
370

 
1,288

 

 
1,658

 
(318
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Baltimore
 
MD
 

 
760

 
802

 

 
1,562

 
(202
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Baltimore
 
MD
 

 
904

 
1,035

 

 
1,939

 
(261
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2002
Wendy's
 
District Heights
 
MD
 

 
332

 
275

 

 
607

 
(69
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1979
Wendy's
 
Landover
 
MD
 

 
340

 
267

 

 
607

 
(67
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Pasadena
 
MD
 

 
1,049

 
1,902

 

 
2,951

 
(479
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1997

F-197



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Salisbury
 
MD
 

 
370

 
1,299

 

 
1,669

 
(321
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Madison Heights
 
MI
 

 
198

 
725

 
(477
)
 
446

 
(16
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1998
Wendy's
 
Picayune
 
MS
 

 
437

 
1,032

 

 
1,469

 
(217
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Kinston
 
NC
 

 
491

 
1,159

 

 
1,650

 
(236
)
 
5/1/2014
 
2004
Wendy's
 
Bellevue
 
NE
 

 
338

 
484

 

 
822

 
(122
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1981
Wendy's
 
Millville
 
NJ
 

 
373

 
1,169

 

 
1,542

 
(294
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Henderson
 
NV
 

 
933

 
842

 

 
1,775

 
(212
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1997
Wendy's
 
Henderson
 
NV
 

 
882

 
457

 

 
1,339

 
(114
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Henderson
 
NV
 

 
785

 
507

 

 
1,292

 
(138
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Wendy's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
398

 
589

 

 
987

 
(129
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1976
Wendy's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
919

 
562

 

 
1,481

 
(147
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1976
Wendy's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
789

 
583

 

 
1,372

 
(130
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
725

 
458

 

 
1,183

 
(118
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
915

 
724

 

 
1,639

 
(177
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1991
Wendy's
 
Las Vegas
 
NV
 

 
633

 
392

 

 
1,025

 
(90
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Auburn
 
NY
 

 
465

 
1,085

 

 
1,550

 
(255
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Binghamton
 
NY
 

 
293

 
879

 

 
1,172

 
(207
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Corning
 
NY
 

 
191

 
1,717

 

 
1,908

 
(404
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
Cortland
 
NY
 

 
635

 
952

 

 
1,587

 
(224
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Endicott
 
NY
 

 
313

 
1,253

 

 
1,566

 
(295
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
Fulton
 
NY
 

 
392

 
1,181

 

 
1,573

 
(248
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Horseheads
 
NY
 

 
72

 
1,369

 

 
1,441

 
(322
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Wendy's
 
Liverpool
 
NY
 

 
530

 
864

 

 
1,394

 
(82
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Oswego
 
NY
 

 
190

 
645

 

 
835

 
(135
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Owego
 
NY
 

 
101

 
1,915

 

 
2,016

 
(450
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Vestal
 
NY
 

 
488

 
878

 

 
1,366

 
(83
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Belpre
 
OH
 

 
297

 
1,194

 

 
1,491

 
(251
)
 
3/26/2014
 
2000
Wendy's
 
Bowling Green
 
OH
 

 
502

 
932

 
(926
)
 
508

 
(38
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Brookville
 
OH
 

 
448

 
1,072

 

 
1,520

 
(225
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Buckeye Lake
 
OH
 

 
864

 
877

 

 
1,741

 
(221
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2000
Wendy's
 
Centerville
 
OH
 

 
615

 
1,434

 

 
2,049

 
(337
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1997

F-198



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Cincinnati
 
OH
 

 
939

 
1,408

 

 
2,347

 
(331
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
723

 
1,343

 

 
2,066

 
(316
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
304

 
1,264

 

 
1,568

 
(265
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1974
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
288

 
813

 

 
1,101

 
(171
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
342

 
848

 

 
1,190

 
(178
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1973
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
274

 
1,029

 

 
1,303

 
(224
)
 
3/26/2014
 
2004
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
286

 
869

 

 
1,155

 
(183
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Dayton
 
OH
 

 
259

 
838

 

 
1,097

 
(176
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Eaton
 
OH
 

 
207

 
1,084

 

 
1,291

 
(103
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Englewood
 
OH
 

 
261

 
924

 

 
1,185

 
(194
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1976
Wendy's
 
Fairborn
 
OH
 

 
629

 
1,468

 

 
2,097

 
(345
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Fairborn
 
OH
 

 
604

 
1,408

 

 
2,012

 
(331
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1992
Wendy's
 
Fairborn
 
OH
 

 
271

 
828

 

 
1,099

 
(174
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1975
Wendy's
 
Fairfield
 
OH
 

 
794

 
970

 

 
1,764

 
(228
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1981
Wendy's
 
Hamilton
 
OH
 

 
655

 
1,848

 

 
2,503

 
(465
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Hamilton
 
OH
 

 
697

 
1,295

 

 
1,992

 
(305
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1974
Wendy's
 
Hamilton
 
OH
 

 
908

 
1,362

 

 
2,270

 
(320
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Wendy's
 
Hillsboro
 
OH
 

 
291

 
1,408

 

 
1,699

 
(354
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Lancaster
 
OH
 

 
552

 
1,025

 

 
1,577

 
(241
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Miamisburg
 
OH
 

 
888

 
1,086

 

 
1,974

 
(255
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Middletown
 
OH
 

 
755

 
1,133

 

 
1,888

 
(266
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Middletown
 
OH
 

 
752

 
920

 

 
1,672

 
(216
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Middletown
 
OH
 

 
494

 
1,481

 

 
1,975

 
(348
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Saint Bernard
 
OH
 

 
432

 
1,009

 

 
1,441

 
(237
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Springboro
 
OH
 

 
891

 
1,336

 

 
2,227

 
(314
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Wendy's
 
Swanton
 
OH
 

 
430

 
1,233

 

 
1,663

 
(305
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Sylvania
 
OH
 

 
300

 
799

 

 
1,099

 
(197
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
West Carrollton
 
OH
 

 
708

 
865

 

 
1,573

 
(203
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Wendy's
 
West Chester
 
OH
 

 
944

 
772

 

 
1,716

 
(182
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Wendy's
 
West Chester
 
OH
 

 
616

 
924

 

 
1,540

 
(217
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2005
Wendy's
 
Whitehall
 
OH
 

 
716

 
863

 

 
1,579

 
(217
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Wintersville
 
OH
 

 
621

 
1,449

 

 
2,070

 
(341
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977

F-199



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Edmond
 
OK
 

 
791

 
697

 

 
1,488

 
(146
)
 
3/27/2014
 
1979
Wendy's
 
Enid
 
OK
 

 
158

 
893

 

 
1,051

 
(210
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2003
Wendy's
 
Ponca City
 
OK
 

 
529

 
983

 

 
1,512

 
(231
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Wendy's
 
Sayre
 
PA
 

 
372

 
1,115

 

 
1,487

 
(262
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Anderson
 
SC
 

 
734

 
897

 

 
1,631

 
(346
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Columbia
 
SC
 

 
1,368

 

 

 
1,368

 

 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Greenville
 
SC
 

 
516

 
631

 

 
1,147

 
(148
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1975
Wendy's
 
N. Myrtle Beach
 
SC
 

 
464

 
861

 

 
1,325

 
(202
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Spartanburg
 
SC
 

 
699

 
572

 

 
1,271

 
(135
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Brentwood
 
TN
 

 
339

 
1,356

 

 
1,695

 
(319
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1982
Wendy's
 
Crossville
 
TN
 

 
190

 
760

 

 
950

 
(179
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
330

 
1,161

 

 
1,491

 
(287
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Knoxville
 
TN
 

 
330

 
1,132

 

 
1,462

 
(280
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Manchester
 
TN
 

 
245

 
1,390

 

 
1,635

 
(327
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Mcminnville
 
TN
 

 
255

 
1,443

 

 
1,698

 
(339
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2010
Wendy's
 
Millington
 
TN
 

 
380

 
1,208

 

 
1,588

 
(299
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Murfreesboro
 
TN
 

 
586

 
1,088

 

 
1,674

 
(256
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
592

 
1,100

 

 
1,692

 
(259
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Nashville
 
TN
 

 
328

 
1,313

 

 
1,641

 
(309
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Arlington
 
TX
 

 
1,322

 
1,546

 

 
2,868

 
(389
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Corpus Christi
 
TX
 

 
646

 
1,198

 

 
1,844

 
(282
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
El Paso
 
TX
 

 
630

 
1,889

 

 
2,519

 
(444
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
Kingwood
 
TX
 

 
304

 
1,724

 
(944
)
 
1,084

 
(76
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
268

 
630

 

 
898

 
(158
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
410

 
451

 

 
861

 
(114
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
707

 
603

 

 
1,310

 
(126
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1990
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
633

 
1,388

 

 
2,021

 
(268
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1992
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
1,007

 
546

 

 
1,553

 
(118
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
703

 
45

 

 
748

 
(19
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2000
Wendy's
 
San Antonio
 
TX
 

 
788

 
45

 

 
833

 
(19
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Wendy's
 
San Marcos
 
TX
 

 
714

 
1,024

 

 
1,738

 
(208
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2002
Wendy's
 
Schertz
 
TX
 

 
793

 
109

 

 
902

 
(27
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994

F-200



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Selma
 
TX
 

 
841

 
117

 

 
958

 
(25
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2003
Wendy's
 
Bluefield
 
VA
 

 
450

 
1,927

 

 
2,377

 
(476
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Christiansburg
 
VA
 

 
416

 
624

 

 
1,040

 
(147
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Dublin
 
VA
 

 
384

 
1,401

 

 
1,785

 
(353
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1993
Wendy's
 
Emporia
 
VA
 

 
631

 
1,424

 

 
2,055

 
(359
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Hayes
 
VA
 

 
304

 
859

 

 
1,163

 
(216
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1992
Wendy's
 
Hillsville
 
VA
 

 
324

 
973

 

 
1,297

 
(229
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Lebanon
 
VA
 

 
431

 
1,006

 

 
1,437

 
(237
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Mechanicsville
 
VA
 

 
521

 
704

 

 
1,225

 
(177
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
North Tazewell
 
VA
 

 
124

 
560

 

 
684

 
(141
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Pounding Mill
 
VA
 

 
296

 
1,404

 

 
1,700

 
(353
)
 
6/27/2013
 
2004
Wendy's
 
Woodbridge
 
VA
 

 
1,193

 
1,598

 

 
2,791

 
(402
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
Woodbridge
 
VA
 

 
521

 
615

 

 
1,136

 
(155
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1978
Wendy's
 
Wytheville
 
VA
 

 
598

 
897

 

 
1,495

 
(211
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2003
Wendy's
 
Bellingham
 
WA
 

 
502

 
477

 

 
979

 
(105
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Bothell
 
WA
 

 
687

 
292

 

 
979

 
(50
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2004
Wendy's
 
Burlington
 
WA
 

 
425

 
806

 

 
1,231

 
(203
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1994
Wendy's
 
Port Angeles
 
WA
 

 
422

 
502

 

 
924

 
(187
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Redmond
 
WA
 

 
969

 
123

 

 
1,092

 
(17
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Silverdale
 
WA
 

 
808

 
201

 

 
1,009

 
(122
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Beloit
 
WI
 

 
1,138

 
931

 

 
2,069

 
(219
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2002
Wendy's
 
Fitchburg
 
WI
 

 
662

 
1,230

 

 
1,892

 
(289
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2003
Wendy's
 
Germantown
 
WI
 

 
419

 
1,257

 

 
1,676

 
(296
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1989
Wendy's
 
Greenfield
 
WI
 

 
487

 
1,137

 

 
1,624

 
(267
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Janesville
 
WI
 

 
647

 
971

 

 
1,618

 
(228
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1991
Wendy's
 
Kenosha
 
WI
 

 
322

 
1,290

 

 
1,612

 
(303
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Kenosha
 
WI
 

 
965

 
1,447

 

 
2,412

 
(340
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Wendy's
 
Madison
 
WI
 

 
454

 
1,362

 

 
1,816

 
(320
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1998
Wendy's
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
810

 
810

 

 
1,620

 
(190
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Wendy's
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
338

 
1,351

 

 
1,689

 
(318
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1985
Wendy's
 
Milwaukee
 
WI
 

 
436

 
1,015

 

 
1,451

 
(239
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
New Berlin
 
WI
 

 
903

 
739

 

 
1,642

 
(175
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1983

F-201



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Wendy's
 
Oak Creek
 
WI
 

 
577

 
1,347

 

 
1,924

 
(317
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1999
Wendy's
 
Sheboygan
 
WI
 

 
676

 
1,014

 

 
1,690

 
(238
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
West Allis
 
WI
 

 
583

 
1,083

 

 
1,666

 
(255
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Beaver
 
WV
 

 
290

 
1,156

 

 
1,446

 
(286
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1995
Wendy's
 
Bridgeport
 
WV
 

 
273

 
818

 

 
1,091

 
(192
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Buckhannon
 
WV
 

 
157

 
890

 

 
1,047

 
(209
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1987
Wendy's
 
Clarksburg
 
WV
 

 
277

 
1,181

 

 
1,458

 
(248
)
 
3/26/2014
 
1980
Wendy's
 
Fairmont
 
WV
 

 
224

 
1,119

 

 
1,343

 
(282
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1983
Wendy's
 
Parkersburg
 
WV
 

 
295

 
885

 

 
1,180

 
(208
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1979
Wendy's
 
Parkersburg
 
WV
 

 
311

 
1,243

 

 
1,554

 
(292
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1977
Wendy's
 
Parkersburg
 
WV
 

 
241

 
964

 

 
1,205

 
(227
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1996
Wendy's
 
Ripley
 
WV
 

 
273

 
871

 

 
1,144

 
(219
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1984
Wendy's
 
Saint Marys
 
WV
 

 
70

 
1,322

 

 
1,392

 
(311
)
 
7/31/2013
 
2001
Wendy's
 
Vienna
 
WV
 

 
301

 
702

 

 
1,003

 
(165
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1976
West Marine
 
Anchorage
 
AK
 

 
1,220

 
2,531

 

 
3,751

 
(510
)
 
3/31/2014
 
1995
West Marine
 
Fort Lauderdale
 
FL
 

 
4,337

 
9,052

 

 
13,389

 
(1,669
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2011
West Marine
 
Harrison Township
 
MI
 

 
452

 
2,092

 

 
2,544

 
(538
)
 
2/7/2014
 
2009
West Marine
 
Deltaville
 
VA
 

 
425

 
2,409

 

 
2,834

 
(708
)
 
7/31/2012
 
2012
Western Refining
 
Foley
 
MN
 

 
72

 
276

 

 
348

 
(5
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1984
Western Refining
 
Pequot Lakes
 
MN
 

 
158

 
1,489

 

 
1,647

 
(29
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1983
Western Refining
 
Pierz
 
MN
 

 
67

 
411

 

 
478

 
(8
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1996
Western Refining
 
Sartell
 
MN
 

 
718

 
486

 

 
1,204

 
(10
)
 
3/27/2017
 
2000
Western Refining
 
Sauk Rapids
 
MN
 

 
419

 
753

 

 
1,172

 
(15
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1997
Western Refining
 
St. Cloud
 
MN
 

 
582

 
657

 

 
1,239

 
(13
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1987
Western Refining
 
St. Cloud
 
MN
 

 
104

 
136

 

 
240

 
(3
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1922
Western Refining
 
St. Cloud
 
MN
 

 
126

 
151

 

 
277

 
(3
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1968
Western Refining
 
St. Cloud
 
MN
 

 
330

 
365

 

 
695

 
(7
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1984
Western Refining
 
St. Cloud
 
MN
 

 
361

 
433

 

 
794

 
(9
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1987
Western Refining
 
Waite Park
 
MN
 

 
316

 
333

 

 
649

 
(7
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1999
Western Refining
 
Waite Park
 
MN
 

 
770

 
503

 

 
1,273

 
(10
)
 
3/27/2017
 
1999
Whataburger
 
Edna
 
TX
 

 
290

 
869

 

 
1,159

 
(204
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Whataburger
 
El Campo
 
TX
 

 
693

 
1,013

 

 
1,706

 
(255
)
 
6/27/2013
 
1986

F-202



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Costs (1)
 
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2)
 
Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property
 
City
 
State
 
Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 
Land
 
Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements
 
 
Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 
Date Acquired
 
Date of Construction
Whataburger
 
Ingleside
 
TX
 

 
1,106

 
474

 

 
1,580

 
(111
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1986
Whataburger
 
Lubbock
 
TX
 

 
432

 
647

 

 
1,079

 
(152
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1992
Whole Foods
 
Hinsdale
 
IL
 
5,709

 
5,499

 
7,388

 

 
12,887

 
(1,658
)
 
2/7/2014
 
1999
Wild Bill's Sports Salon
 
Rochester
 
MN
 

 
1,347

 
1,102

 

 
2,449

 
(292
)
 
7/31/2013
 
1993
Willbros Group, Inc.
 
Tulsa
 
OK
 

 
2,239

 
6,375

 

 
8,614

 
(935
)
 
6/25/2014
 
1982
Williams Sonoma
 
Olive Branch
 
MS
 

 
2,330

 
44,266

 

 
46,596

 
(14,115
)
 
8/10/2012
 
2001
Winn-Dixie
 
Jacksonville
 
FL
 
63,240

 
4,360

 
82,834

 

 
87,194

 
(19,318
)
 
4/24/2013
 
2000
Worrior Energy Services
 
Midland
 
TX
 

 
508

 
815

 

 
1,323

 
(146
)
 
6/25/2014
 
2012
Other
 
N/A
 
N/A
 

 

 
13,345

 

 
13,345

 
(2,975
)
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,071,038

 
$
2,907,509

 
$
10,769,845

 
$
(99,654
)
 
$
13,577,700

 
$
(2,217,108
)
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
(1)
Initial costs exclude subsequent impairment charges.
(2)
Consists of capital expenditures and real estate development costs, net of condemnations, easements and impairment charges.
(3)
Gross intangible lease assets of $2.04 billion and the associated accumulated amortization of $690.9 million are not reflected in the table above.
(4)
The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes of land, buildings, fixtures and improvements as of December 31, 2017 was $15.6 billion .
(5)
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements.

The following is a reconciliation of the gross real estate activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (amounts in thousands):
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Balance, beginning of year
 
$
13,539,921

 
$
14,566,343

 
$
15,857,507

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions
 
634,080

 
91,052

 
33,695

Improvements
 
28,503

 
25,781

 
60,321

Deductions/Other:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dispositions
 
(505,403
)
 
(878,552
)
 
(1,261,724
)
Impairments
 
(82,292
)
 
(228,750
)
 
(106,064
)
Reclassified to assets held for sale
 
(52,376
)
 
(36,722
)
 
(16,761
)
Other
 
15,267

 
769

 
(631
)
Balance, end of year
 
$
13,577,700

 
$
13,539,921

 
$
14,566,343


F-203




The following is a reconciliation of the accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (amounts in thousands):
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Balance, beginning of year
 
$
1,766,006

 
$
1,331,751

 
$
775,050

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation expense
 
548,901

 
586,321

 
630,347

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dispositions
 
(34,086
)
 
(77,987
)
 
(49,907
)
Impairments
 
(50,828
)
 
(69,040
)
 
(23,196
)
Reclassified to assets held for sale
 
(12,885
)
 
(5,039
)
 
(543
)
Balance, end of year
 
$
2,217,108

 
$
1,766,006

 
$
1,331,751




F-204

VEREIT, INC. AND VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT
December 31, 2017 (in thousands)

Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans Held For Investment
Description
 
Location
 
Interest Rate
 
Final Maturity Date
 
Periodic Payment Terms
 
Prior Liens
 
Face Amount of Mortgages
 
Carrying Amount of Mortgages
 
Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest
Long-Term Mortgage Loans
Bank Of America, N.A.
 
Mt. Airy, MD
 
6.42%
 
12/15/2026
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
$
2,418

 
$
2,618

 
$

CVS Caremark Corporation
 
Evansville, IN
 
6.22%
 
1/15/2033
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
2,571

 
2,812

 

CVS Caremark Corporation
 
Greensboro, GA
 
6.52%
 
1/15/2030
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
952

 
1,053

 

CVS Caremark Corporation
 
Shelby Twp., MI
 
5.98%
 
1/15/2031
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
1,928

 
2,067

 

Lowes Companies, Inc.
 
Framingham, MA
 
5.87%
 
9/15/2031
 
(1)
 
N/A
 
5,953

 
2,169

 

Walgreen Co.
 
Dallas, TX
 
6.46%
 
12/15/2029
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
2,390

 
2,636

 

Walgreen Co.
 
Nacogdoches, TX
 
6.80%
 
9/15/2030
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
2,633

 
2,953

 

Walgreen Co.
 
Rosemead, CA
 
6.26%
 
12/15/2029
 
P&I
 
N/A
 
3,651

 
3,986

 

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
22,496

 
$
20,294

 
$

_______________________________________________
(1) Zero coupon rate with balloon payment due at maturity.
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Beginning Balance
 
$
22,764

 
$
24,238

 
$
26,806

Deductions during the year:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Early payoff of loan investment
 
(1,502
)
 

 

Principal payments received on loan investments
 
(904
)
 
(1,339
)
 
(2,417
)
Amortization of unearned discounts and premiums
 
(64
)
 
(135
)
 
(151
)
Ending Balance
 
$
20,294

 
$
22,764

 
$
24,238



F-205
 
Exhibit 10.34




Mr. Glenn Rufrano
VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016


Dear Mr. Rufrano:

The following sets forth an amendment to the terms and conditions of your employment (the “Amendment”) with VEREIT, Inc. (the “Company”), as set forth in your employment agreement dated as of March 10, 2015, which became effective as of April 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”). This Amendment shall be effective as of the date set forth above (the “Effective Date”).

1.
Section 2 - “TERM” is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

“TERM . This Agreement and the Executive’s employment under the terms of this Agreement shall be effective as of April 1, 2015 (the “ Commencement Date ”) and shall continue in full force and effect thereafter until the third (3 rd ) anniversary of the Commencement Date (the “ Initial Term ”) and is hereby renewed for the period of April 1, 2018 through April 1, 2021 (the “ Second Term ”); and shall be automatically extended for a renewal term of one (1) additional year (a “ Renewal Term ”) at the end of the Second Term, and an additional one (1) year Renewal Term at the end of each Renewal Term (the last day of the Second Term and each such Renewal Term is referred to herein as a “ Term Date ”), unless either party notifies the other party of its non-renewal of this Agreement not later than ninety (90) days prior to a Term Date by providing written notice to the other party of such party’s intent not to renew, or if the Executive’s employment is sooner terminated pursuant to Section 5. For purposes of this Agreement, “ Term ” shall mean the actual duration of the Executive’s employment hereunder, taking into account any extensions pursuant to this Section 2 or early termination of employment pursuant to Section 5.”

2.
Section 3(c) - Annual Long Term Incentive Awards is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

“Annual Long Term Incentive Awards . You will be eligible to receive an annual long term incentive equity award with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock or other securities for each calendar year of your employment, subject to such terms and conditions, including types of award and vesting, as may be determined by the Compensation Committee. Such awards for each calendar year shall be granted by the Company to the Executive at the same time that annual equity awards are granted generally to other senior executives of the Company.”

3.
The final paragraph of each of Sections 6(a), and 6(b) and the final paragraph appearing before the defined terms in Section 6(c) are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

“In addition, upon any termination pursuant to this section, any then-outstanding and unvested portion of any Equity Award shall become vested in accordance with the terms set forth in the applicable award agreement.”

4.
Sections 6(e) and 6(f) are amended by inserting “, the Second Term” immediately following “the Initial Term”.





5.
Section 15(a) is amended by deleting the Company notice information contained therein and substituting as follows:

“If to the Company, to:      VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Attn: Lauren Goldberg, EVP General Counsel
Email: lgoldberg@vereit.com”     
                        






The Agreement remains in full force and effect in all other respects.


Sincerely,



/s/ Hugh Frater
Hugh Frater
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
VEREIT, Inc.

Accepted By:


/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
Glenn J. Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer, VEREIT, Inc.



Exhibit 10.35






VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016



January 31, 2018


Dear Bill:

This letter confirms our mutual understanding relating to the cessation of your employment with VEREIT, Inc. (“VEREIT”) and the transfer of such employment to the CIM Group (“CIM”) in connection with a Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2017, pursuant to which a wholly owned subsidiary of VEREIT agreed to sell its Cole Capital business to an affiliate of the CIM Group, and certain rights and obligations under your Employment Agreement with VEREIT dated as of February 23, 2016, as amended on February 22, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), and under various Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements with VEREIT. Capitalized terms in this letter have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.
    
1. Cessation of Employment . Your position with VEREIT as its Executive Vice President, Investment Management, President and CEO of Cole Capital (and any positions held at VEREIT’s subsidiaries) will end effective as of February 1, 2018, but only upon and subject to closing of the transaction contemplated by the Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Closing Date”).
2. Cash Payments . In full satisfaction of VEREIT’s obligations under the Employment Agreement, you agree that you will receive the Accrued Benefits and any earned and accrued but unpaid Annual Bonus for 2017 (payable at target). In addition to the cash payments identified in the previous sentence, you will receive a special bonus in the amount of $471,300 in recognition of your efforts to complete the anticipated transaction with CIM.
3. Equity Incentive Award . The unvested portions of the awards granted pursuant to the Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements dated as of April 1, 2015, February 23, 2016 and February 22, 2017 (collectively the “Time Based RSU Awards”), will become fully vested as of the Closing Date. The unvested portions of the awards granted pursuant to the Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements dated as of February 23, 2016 and February 22, 2017 (collectively the “Performance Based RSU Awards”), will remain subject to the performance criteria set forth in each award; however, the requirement that you be employed by VEREIT at the end of the Performance Period (as defined in the respective award agreement) will be eliminated.
4. Release of Claims . In accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement, receipt of the payments and benefits set forth in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this letter (other than the Accrued Benefits) are subject to your execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims within 21 days from the Closing Date.
5. Restrictive Covenants . In accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement, you will be bound by and subject to certain post-employment obligations, including without limitation, those set forth in the Employee Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement incorporated therein, provided, however, that VEREIT acknowledges that your employment with CIM shall not be considered a violation of any non-competition provision.              





In acknowledgement and agreement of the terms set forth in this letter, please sign below.


Sincerely,


/s/ Glenn Rufrano         
Glenn Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer




ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:



/s/William C. Miller, Jr.
William C. Miller, Jr.










Exhibit 10.36

        




VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016

February 21, 2018

Ms. Lauren Goldberg
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
VEREIT, Inc.

RE: Terms of Employment

Dear Ms. Goldberg:

The following sets forth an amendment to the terms and conditions of your employment (the “ Amendment ”) with VEREIT, Inc. (the “ Company ”), as set forth in your employment agreement dated May 21, 2015, which became effective as of May 26, 2015 (the “ Agreement ”), as amended thereafter.

The following paragraph is inserted prior to the paragraph on page 3 that begins “In the event of a Qualifying Termination.”

“In the event of a Qualifying Termination during a Change in Control Period, in addition to the Accrued Benefits and the Prior Year Bonus, you will be entitled to severance payments equal to the product of (x) two (2) multiplied by (y) the sum of (A) twelve (12) months’ Base Salary plus (B) an amount equal to your Target Bonus as in effect on the date of your termination, payable in a cash lump sum on the sixtieth (60 th ) day after the Date of Termination.”

The following paragraphs are inserted after the paragraph on page 4 containing the definition of “Cause”:

Change in Control ” shall mean (i) any one person or more than one person acting as a group (as defined under Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B)) (“ Person ”), acquires shares of the Company having more than 50% of the total voting power or total fair market value of the stock of the Company, not including any merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company where the shareholders of the Company are substantially the same as before such transaction, (ii) any Person acquires assets of the Company having a total gross fair market value equal to 40% or more of all of the assets of the Company immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions, or (iii) a majority of the members of the Board is replaced in any 12-month period by directors whose appointment is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; provided, however , that no Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred unless such event constitutes a “Change in Control” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

Change in Control Period ” shall mean the period beginning one hundred twenty (120) days prior to, and ending twenty-four (24) months following, a Change in Control.”





The Agreement remains in full force and effect in all other respects.


Sincerely,


/s/ Glenn Rufrano
Glenn Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

Accepted By:


/s/ Lauren Goldberg
Lauren Goldberg



Exhibit 10.37

    




VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016

February 21, 2018

Mr. Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

RE: Terms of Employment

Dear Mr. Bartolotta:

The following sets forth an amendment to the terms and conditions of your employment (the “ Amendment ”) with VEREIT, Inc. (the “ Company ”), as set forth in your employment agreement dated September 30, 2015, which became effective as of October 5, 2015 (the “ Agreement ”).

The following paragraph is inserted prior to the paragraph on page 4 that begins “In the event of a Qualifying Termination.”

“In the event of a Qualifying Termination during a Change in Control Period, in addition to the Accrued Benefits and the Prior Year Bonus, you will be entitled to severance payments equal to the product of (x) two (2) multiplied by (y) the sum of (A) twelve (12) months’ Base Salary plus (B) an amount equal to your Target Bonus as in effect on the date of your termination, payable in a cash lump sum on the sixtieth (60 th ) day after the Date of Termination.”

The following paragraphs are inserted after the paragraph on page 5 containing the definition of “Cause”:

Change in Control ” shall mean (i) any one person or more than one person acting as a group (as defined under Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B)) (“ Person ”), acquires shares of the Company having more than 50% of the total voting power or total fair market value of the stock of the Company, not including any merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company where the shareholders of the Company are substantially the same as before such transaction, (ii) any Person acquires assets of the Company having a total gross fair market value equal to 40% or more of all of the assets of the Company immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions, or (iii) a majority of the members of the Board is replaced in any 12-month period by directors whose appointment is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; provided, however , that no Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred unless such event constitutes a “Change in Control” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

Change in Control Period ” shall mean the period beginning one hundred twenty (120) days prior to, and ending twenty-four (24) months following, a Change in Control.”





The Agreement remains in full force and effect in all other respects.


Sincerely,


/s/ Glenn Rufrano
Glenn Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

Accepted By:


/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta



Exhibit 10.38

        




VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016

February 21, 2018

Mr. Paul McDowell
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

RE: Terms of Employment

Dear Mr. McDowell:

The following sets forth an amendment to the terms and conditions of your employment (the “ Amendment ”) with VEREIT, Inc. (the “ Company ”), as set forth in your employment agreement dated and effective as of February 23, 2016 (the “ Agreement ”).

The following paragraph is inserted prior to the paragraph on page 4 that begins “In the event of a Qualifying Termination.”

“In the event of a Qualifying Termination during a Change in Control Period, in addition to the Accrued Benefits and the Prior Year Bonus, you will be entitled to severance payments equal to the product of (x) two (2) multiplied by (y) the sum of (A) twelve (12) months’ Base Salary plus (B) an amount equal to the Target Bonus as in effect on the date of your termination, payable in a cash lump sum on the sixtieth (60 th ) day after the Date of Termination.”

The following paragraphs are inserted after the paragraph on page 5 containing the definition of “Cause”:

Change in Control ” shall mean (i) any one person or more than one person acting as a group (as defined under Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B)) (“ Person ”), acquires shares of the Company having more than 50% of the total voting power or total fair market value of the stock of the Company, not including any merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company where the shareholders of the Company are substantially the same as before such transaction, (ii) any Person acquires assets of the Company having a total gross fair market value equal to 40% or more of all of the assets of the Company immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions, or (iii) a majority of the members of the Board is replaced in any 12-month period by directors whose appointment is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; provided, however , that no Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred unless such event constitutes a “Change in Control” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

Change in Control Period ” shall mean the period beginning one hundred twenty (120) days prior to, and ending twenty-four (24) months following, a Change in Control.”





The Agreement remains in full force and effect in all other respects.


Sincerely,


/s/ Glenn Rufrano
Glenn Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

Accepted By:


/s/ Paul H. McDowell
Paul H. McDowell



Exhibit 10.39

        




VEREIT, Inc.
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100
Phoenix, AZ 85016

February 21, 2018

Mr. Thomas Roberts
Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

RE: Terms of Employment

Dear Mr. Roberts:

The following sets forth an amendment to the terms and conditions of your employment (the “ Amendment ”) with VEREIT, Inc. (the “ Company ”), as set forth in your employment agreement dated and effective as of February 23, 2016 (the “ Agreement ”).

The following paragraph is inserted prior to the paragraph on page 3 that begins “In the event of a Qualifying Termination.”

“In the event of a Qualifying Termination during a Change in Control Period, in addition to the Accrued Benefits and the Prior Year Bonus, you will be entitled to severance payments equal to the product of (x) two (2) multiplied by (y) the sum of (A) twelve (12) months’ Base Salary plus (B) an amount equal to your Target Bonus as in effect on the date of your termination, payable in a cash lump sum on the sixtieth (60 th ) day after the Date of Termination.”

The following paragraphs are inserted after the paragraph on page 4 containing the definition of “Cause”:

Change in Control ” shall mean (i) any one person or more than one person acting as a group (as defined under Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B)) (“ Person ”), acquires shares of the Company having more than 50% of the total voting power or total fair market value of the stock of the Company, not including any merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company where the shareholders of the Company are substantially the same as before such transaction, (ii) any Person acquires assets of the Company having a total gross fair market value equal to 40% or more of all of the assets of the Company immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions, or (iii) a majority of the members of the Board is replaced in any 12-month period by directors whose appointment is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; provided, however , that no Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred unless such event constitutes a “Change in Control” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

Change in Control Period ” shall mean the period beginning one hundred twenty (120) days prior to, and ending twenty-four (24) months following, a Change in Control.”





The Agreement remains in full force and effect in all other respects.


Sincerely,


/s/ Glenn Rufrano
Glenn Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer
VEREIT, Inc.

Accepted By:


/s/ Thomas Roberts
Thomas Roberts



Exhibit 10.40
Officer Option Award



        

NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
UNDER THE VEREIT, INC. EQUITY PLAN

Name of Optionee:     
 
 
 
No. of Option Shares:     
 
 
 
Option Exercise Price per Share:
$
 
 
 
[FMV on Grant Date]
 
 
Grant Date:     
 
 
 
Expiration Date:
 
 
 
Pursuant to the VEREIT, Inc. Equity Plan, as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), VEREIT, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby grants to the Optionee named above an option (this “Stock Option”) to purchase on or prior to the Expiration Date specified above all or part of the number of shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Stock”) of the Company specified above at the Option Exercise Price per Share specified above subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan (the “Option Shares”). This Stock Option is not intended to be an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
1. Exercisability Schedule . No portion of this Stock Option may be exercised until such portion shall have become exercisable. Except as set forth below, and subject to the discretion of the Board or the Committee (as set forth in Section 3 of the Plan) to accelerate the exercisability schedule hereunder, this Stock Option shall be exercisable with respect to the following number of Option Shares on the date indicated so long as Optionee remains an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary on such dates:

Incremental Number of
Option Shares Exercisable
Exercisability Date
_____________ (100%)
_____________
Once exercisable, this Stock Option shall continue to be exercisable at any time or times prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date, subject to the provisions hereof and of the Plan.
2. Manner of Exercise .

(a) The Optionee may exercise this Stock Option only in the following manner: from time to time on or prior to the Expiration Date of this Stock Option, the Optionee may give written notice to the Company of his or her election to purchase some or all of the Option Shares purchasable at the time of such notice. This notice shall specify the number of Option Shares to be purchased.




Officer Option Award



Payment of the purchase price for the Option Shares may be made by one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument acceptable to the Board or Committee, as applicable; (ii) through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that have been purchased by the Optionee on the open market or that are beneficially owned by the Optionee and are not then subject to any restrictions under any Company plan and that otherwise satisfy any holding periods as may be required by the Board or Committee, as applicable; (iii) by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; or (iv) a combination of (i), (ii) and (iii) above. Payment instruments will be received subject to collection.
The transfer to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the Option Shares will be contingent upon (i) the Company’s receipt from the Optionee of the full purchase price for the Option Shares, as set forth above, (ii) the fulfillment of any other requirements contained herein or in the Plan or in any other agreement or provision of laws, and (iii) the receipt by the Company of any agreement, statement or other evidence that the Company may require to satisfy itself that the issuance of Stock to be purchased pursuant to the exercise of Stock Options under the Plan and any subsequent resale of the shares of Stock will be in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In the event the Optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of shares of Stock transferred to the Optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the Shares attested to.
(b) The shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of this Stock Option shall be transferred to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent upon compliance to the satisfaction of the Board or Committee, as applciable with all requirements under applicable laws or regulations in connection with such transfer and with the requirements hereof and of the Plan. The determination of the Board or Committee as to such compliance shall be final and binding on the Optionee. The Optionee shall not be deemed to be the holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Stock subject to this Stock Option unless and until this Stock Option shall have been exercised pursuant to the terms hereof, the Company or the transfer agent shall have transferred the shares to the Optionee, and the Optionee’s name shall have been entered as the stockholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Optionee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such shares of Stock.

(c) The minimum number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option may be exercised at any one time shall be 100 shares, unless the number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option is being exercised is the total number of shares subject to exercise under this Stock Option at the time.

3. Acceleration of Exercisability .
  
(a) In the event of a termination of the Optionee’s employment as a result of the Optionee’s death or Disability (as defined in the Optionee’s Employment Agreement as in effect on the Grant Date, the “Employment Agreement”), a pro rata portion of the Optionee’s Stock Option shall automatically become exercisable, determined by multiplying the number of Option Shares by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of whole months elapsed from the Grant Date until the date of such termination, and the denominator of which is the number of full months from the Grant Date through the Exercisability Date, and the remainder of such Stock Option shall be forfeited.





Officer Option Award


(b) In the event of a termination of the Optionee’s employment by the Company without Cause or by the Optionee for Good Reason (each as defined in the Employment Agreement), this Stock Option shall automatically become exercisable in full as of the date of the Optionee’s termination of employment, provided, however, that the Optionee has timely executed, and not revoked, a fully effective release of claims in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement.

(c) Except as provided in Section 3(a) or 3(b) of this Stock Option , there shall be no proportionate or partial acceleration in the periods prior to the Exercisability Date and all vesting shall occur only on the Exercisability Date.

4. Termination of Employment . If the Optionee’s employment by the Company or a Subsidiary (as defined in the Plan) is terminated, the period within which to exercise the Stock Option may be subject to earlier termination as set forth below.

(a) Termination Due to Death . If the Optionee’s employment terminates by reason of the Optionee’s death, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of death, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee for a period of 12 months from the date of death or until the Expiration Date, if earlier.

(b) Termination Due to Disability . If the Optionee’s employment terminates by reason of the Optionee’s Disability, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of such termination of employment, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee for a period of 12 months from the date of Disability or until the Expiration Date, if earlier.

(c) Termination for Cause . If the Optionee’s employment terminates for Cause, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date shall terminate immediately and be of no further force and effect. For purposes hereof, “Cause” shall mean, unless otherwise provided in an Employment Agreement between the Company and the Optionee, a determination by the Administrator that the Optionee shall be dismissed as a result of (i) any material breach by the Optionee of any agreement between the Optionee and the Company; (ii) the conviction of, indictment for or plea of nolo contendere by the Optionee to a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude; or (iii) any material misconduct or willful and deliberate non-performance (other than by reason of disability) by the Optionee of the Optionee’s duties to the Company.

(d) Other Termination . If the Optionee’s employment terminates for any reason other than the Optionee’s death, the Optionee’s Disability or Cause, and unless otherwise determined by the Board or Committee, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date may be exercised, to the extent exercisable on the date of termination, for a period of three months from the date of termination or until the Expiration Date, if earlier.

The Board or Committee’s determination of the reason for termination of the Optionee’s employment shall be conclusive and binding on the Optionee and his or her representatives or legatees.
5. Incorporation of Plan . Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Stock Option shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions of the Plan, including, without limitation, the amendment provisions thereof, the powers of the Board and the Committee set forth in Section 3 of the Plan, and such rules, regulations and interpretations relating to the Plan as may be adopted thereunder and as may be in effect from time to time. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan, unless a different meaning is specified herein. The Plan is incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the Plan has been delivered to the Participant. If and to the extent that this Agreement




Officer Option Award


conflicts or is inconsistent with the terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan, the Plan shall control, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be modified accordingly. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof (other than any other documents expressly contemplated herein or in the Plan) and supersedes any prior agreements between the Company and the Optionee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) Section 8 (entitled “Excise Tax”) of the Plan shall not be applicable to the Participant with respect to the matters contemplated therein, and the section entitled “Code Section 280G” of the Employment Agreement shall instead apply for purposes of this Agreement, and (ii) Section 7 (entitled “Change in Control”) of the Plan shall not be applicable to the Participant with respect to the matters contemplated therein, and Section 3 of this Agreement shall instead apply for purposes of this Agreement.

6. Execution . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one contract.

7. Transferability . This Agreement is personal to the Optionee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Stock Option is exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee, and thereafter, only by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee.

8. Tax Withholding . The Optionee shall, not later than the date as of which the exercise of this Stock Option becomes a taxable event for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Board or Committee, as applicable, for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on account of such taxable event. The Company shall have the authority to cause the minimum required tax withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from shares of Stock to be issued to the Optionee a number of shares of Stock with an aggregate Fair Market Value that would satisfy the minimum withholding amount due.

9. No Obligation to Continue Employment . Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is obligated by or as a result of the Plan or this Stock Option to continue the Optionee in employment and neither the Plan nor this Stock Option shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate the employment of the Optionee at any time.

10. Integration . This Stock Option constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Stock Option and supersedes all prior agreements and discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

11. Data Privacy Consent . In order to administer the Plan and this Agreement and to implement or structure future equity grants, the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan and/or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Optionee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to the Relevant Companies all Relevant Information; (ii) waives any privacy rights the Optionee may have with respect to the Relevant Information; (iii) authorizes the Relevant Companies to store and transmit such information in electronic form; and (iv) authorizes the transfer of the Relevant Information to any jurisdiction in which the Relevant Companies consider appropriate. The Optionee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance with applicable law.





Officer Option Award


12. Notices . Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and directed to the Chief Financial Officer and shall be mailed or delivered to the Optionee at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

13. Consent to Electronic Delivery; Electronic Signature . In lieu of receiving documents in paper format, the Optionee agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to accept electronic delivery of any documents that the Company may be required to deliver (including, without limitation, prospectuses, prospectus supplements, grant or award notifications and agreements, account statements, annual and quarterly reports, and all other forms of communications) in connection with this and any other award made or offered by the Company. Electronic delivery may be via an electronic mail system or by reference to a location on the Company’s intranet to which the Optionee has access. The Optionee consents to any and all procedures the Company has established or may establish for an electronic signature system for delivery and acceptance of any such documents that the Company may be required to deliver, and agrees that his or her electronic signature is the same as, and shall have the same force and effect as, his or her manual signature.

[signature page(s) follows]





Officer Option Award


 
 
VEREIT, Inc.

 
 
By:
 
 
 
 
Title:
Dated:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Optionee’s Signature

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Optionee’s name and address:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

    



Exhibit 10.41
Management Option Award

        

NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
UNDER THE VEREIT, INC. EQUITY PLAN

Name of Optionee:     
 
 
 
No. of Option Shares:     
 
 
 
Option Exercise Price per Share:
$
 
 
 
[FMV on Grant Date]
 
 
Grant Date:     
 
 
 
Expiration Date:
 
 
 
Pursuant to the VEREIT, Inc. Equity Plan, as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), VEREIT, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby grants to the Optionee named above an option (this “Stock Option”) to purchase on or prior to the Expiration Date specified above all or part of the number of shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Stock”) of the Company specified above at the Option Exercise Price per Share specified above subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan (the “Option Shares”). This Stock Option is not intended to be an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
1. Exercisability Schedule . No portion of this Stock Option may be exercised until such portion shall have become exercisable. Except as set forth below, and subject to the discretion of the Board or the Committee (as set forth in Section 3 of the Plan) to accelerate the exercisability schedule hereunder, this Stock Option shall be exercisable with respect to the following number of Option Shares on the date indicated so long as Optionee remains an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary on such dates:

Incremental Number of
Option Shares Exercisable
Exercisability Date
_____________ (100%)
_____________

Once exercisable, this Stock Option shall continue to be exercisable at any time or times prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date, subject to the provisions hereof and of the Plan.
2. Manner of Exercise .

(a) The Optionee may exercise this Stock Option only in the following manner: from time to time on or prior to the Expiration Date of this Stock Option, the Optionee may give written notice to




Management Option Award


the Company of his or her election to purchase some or all of the Option Shares purchasable at the time of such notice. This notice shall specify the number of Option Shares to be purchased.

Payment of the purchase price for the Option Shares may be made by one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument acceptable to the Board or Committee, as applicable; (ii) through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that have been purchased by the Optionee on the open market or that are beneficially owned by the Optionee and are not then subject to any restrictions under any Company plan and that otherwise satisfy any holding periods as may be required by the Board or Committee, as applicable; (iii) by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; or (iv) a combination of (i), (ii) and (iii) above. Payment instruments will be received subject to collection.
The transfer to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the Option Shares will be contingent upon (i) the Company’s receipt from the Optionee of the full purchase price for the Option Shares, as set forth above, (ii) the fulfillment of any other requirements contained herein or in the Plan or in any other agreement or provision of laws, and (iii) the receipt by the Company of any agreement, statement or other evidence that the Company may require to satisfy itself that the issuance of Stock to be purchased pursuant to the exercise of Stock Options under the Plan and any subsequent resale of the shares of Stock will be in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In the event the Optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of shares of Stock transferred to the Optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the Shares attested to.
(b) The shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of this Stock Option shall be transferred to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent upon compliance to the satisfaction of the Board or Committee, as applciable with all requirements under applicable laws or regulations in connection with such transfer and with the requirements hereof and of the Plan. The determination of the Board or Committee as to such compliance shall be final and binding on the Optionee. The Optionee shall not be deemed to be the holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Stock subject to this Stock Option unless and until this Stock Option shall have been exercised pursuant to the terms hereof, the Company or the transfer agent shall have transferred the shares to the Optionee, and the Optionee’s name shall have been entered as the stockholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Optionee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such shares of Stock.

(c) The minimum number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option may be exercised at any one time shall be 100 shares, unless the number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option is being exercised is the total number of shares subject to exercise under this Stock Option at the time.

3. Acceleration of Exercisability .

(a) In the event of a termination of the Optionee’s employment as a result of the Optionee’s death or Disability (as defined below), or by the Company without Cause (as defined below) a pro rata portion of the Optionee’s Stock Option shall automatically become exercisable, determined by multiplying the number of Option Shares by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of whole months elapsed from the Grant Date until the date of such termination, and the denominator of which is the number of full months from the Grant Date through the Exercisability Date, and the remainder of such Stock Option shall be forfeited.




Management Option Award


  
(b) Except as provided in Section 3(a) of this Stock Option, there shall be no proportionate or partial acceleration in the periods prior to the Exercisability Date and all vesting shall occur only on the Exercisability Date.

(c) For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” shall have the meaning of such definition in any employment agreement between the Optionee and the Company, and if no such definition exists, then “Cause” shall mean (i) commission, with respect to the Company, an act of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, intentional misrepresentation or conversion of assets, (ii) conviction of, or entered a plea of guilty or “nolo contendere” to, a felony (excluding any felony relating to the negligent operation of an automobile), (iii) willfully failing to substantially perform (other than by reason of illness or temporary disability) the Optionee’s reasonably assigned material duties, (iv) engaging in willful misconduct in the performance of the Optionee’s duties, (v) engaging in conduct that violated the Company’s then existing written internal policies or procedures and which is materially detrimental to the business and reputation of the Company, or (vi) materially breached any non-competition, non-disclosure or other agreement in effect between the Optionee and the Company.

(d) For purposes of this Agreement, “Disability” shall have the meaning of such definition in any employment agreement between the Optionee and the Company, and if no such definition exists, then “Disability” shall mean that you are unable to perform your duties due to any sickness, injury or disability for a consecutive period of one hundred eighty (180) days or an aggregate of six (6) months in any twelve (12)-consecutive month period. A determination of “Disability” shall be made by a physician satisfactory to both you and the Company, provided that if you and the Company do not agree on a physician, you and the Company shall each select a physician and these two together shall select a third physician, whose determination as to Disability shall be binding on all parties. The appointment of one or more individuals to carry out your offices or duties during a period of your inability to perform such duties and pending a determination of Disability shall not be considered a breach of any agreement by the Company.

4. Termination of Employment . If the Optionee’s employment by the Company or a Subsidiary (as defined in the Plan) is terminated, the period within which to exercise the Stock Option may be subject to earlier termination as set forth below.

(a) Termination Due to Death . If the Optionee’s employment terminates by reason of the Optionee’s death, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of death, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee for a period of 12 months from the date of death or until the Expiration Date, if earlier.

(b) Termination Due to Disability . If the Optionee’s employment terminates by reason of the Optionee’s Disability, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of such termination of employment, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee for a period of 12 months from the date of Disability or until the Expiration Date, if earlier.

(c) Termination for Cause . If the Optionee’s employment terminates for Cause, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date shall terminate immediately and be of no further force and effect. For purposes hereof, “Cause” shall mean, unless otherwise provided in an Employment Agreement between the Company and the Optionee, a determination by the Administrator that the Optionee shall be dismissed as a result of (i) any material breach by the Optionee of any agreement between the Optionee and the Company; (ii) the conviction of, indictment for or plea of nolo contendere by the Optionee to a felony




Management Option Award


or a crime involving moral turpitude; or (iii) any material misconduct or willful and deliberate non-performance (other than by reason of disability) by the Optionee of the Optionee’s duties to the Company.

(d) Other Termination . If the Optionee’s employment terminates for any reason other than the Optionee’s death, the Optionee’s Disability or Cause, and unless otherwise determined by the Board or Committee, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date may be exercised, to the extent exercisable on the date of termination, for a period of three months from the date of termination or until the Expiration Date, if earlier.

The Board or Committee’s determination of the reason for termination of the Optionee’s employment shall be conclusive and binding on the Optionee and his or her representatives or legatees.
5. Incorporation of Plan . Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Stock Option shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions of the Plan, including, without limitation, the amendment provisions thereof, the powers of the Board and the Committee set forth in Section 3 of the Plan, and such rules, regulations and interpretations relating to the Plan as may be adopted thereunder and as may be in effect from time to time. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan, unless a different meaning is specified herein. The Plan is incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the Plan has been delivered to the Participant. If and to the extent that this Agreement conflicts or is inconsistent with the terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan, the Plan shall control, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be modified accordingly. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof (other than any other documents expressly contemplated herein or in the Plan) and supersedes any prior agreements between the Company and the Optionee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) Section 8 (entitled “Excise Tax”) of the Plan shall not be applicable to the Participant with respect to the matters contemplated therein, and (ii) Section 7 (entitled “Change in Control”) of the Plan shall not be applicable to the Participant with respect to the matters contemplated therein, and Section 3 of this Agreement shall instead apply for purposes of this Agreement.

6. Execution . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one contract.

7. Transferability . This Agreement is personal to the Optionee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Stock Option is exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee, and thereafter, only by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee.

8. Tax Withholding . The Optionee shall, not later than the date as of which the exercise of this Stock Option becomes a taxable event for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Board or Committee, as applicable, for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on account of such taxable event. The Company shall have the authority to cause the minimum required tax withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from shares of Stock to be issued to the Optionee a number of shares of Stock with an aggregate Fair Market Value that would satisfy the minimum withholding amount due.

9. No Obligation to Continue Employment . Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is obligated by or as a result of the Plan or this Stock Option to continue the Optionee in employment and neither the Plan nor this Stock Option shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate the employment of the Optionee at any time.





Management Option Award


10. Integration . This Stock Option constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Stock Option and supersedes all prior agreements and discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

11. Data Privacy Consent . In order to administer the Plan and this Agreement and to implement or structure future equity grants, the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan and/or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Optionee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to the Relevant Companies all Relevant Information; (ii) waives any privacy rights the Optionee may have with respect to the Relevant Information; (iii) authorizes the Relevant Companies to store and transmit such information in electronic form; and (iv) authorizes the transfer of the Relevant Information to any jurisdiction in which the Relevant Companies consider appropriate. The Optionee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance with applicable law.

12. Notices . Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and directed to the Chief Financial Officer and shall be mailed or delivered to the Optionee at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

13. Consent to Electronic Delivery; Electronic Signature . In lieu of receiving documents in paper format, the Optionee agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to accept electronic delivery of any documents that the Company may be required to deliver (including, without limitation, prospectuses, prospectus supplements, grant or award notifications and agreements, account statements, annual and quarterly reports, and all other forms of communications) in connection with this and any other award made or offered by the Company. Electronic delivery may be via an electronic mail system or by reference to a location on the Company’s intranet to which the Optionee has access. The Optionee consents to any and all procedures the Company has established or may establish for an electronic signature system for delivery and acceptance of any such documents that the Company may be required to deliver, and agrees that his or her electronic signature is the same as, and shall have the same force and effect as, his or her manual signature.

[signature page(s) follows]





Management Option Award



 
 
VEREIT, Inc.

 
 
By:
 
 
 
 
Title:
Dated:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Optionee’s Signature

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Optionee’s name and address:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

    
    



Exhibit 12.1
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

The following table sets forth the Company's consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the periods as shown (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before income (loss) from equity investees
 
$
55,614

 
$
(79,534
)
 
$
(143,495
)
 
$
(716,701
)
 
$
(505,620
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed charges
 
290,218

 
318,033

 
360,215

 
453,216

 
105,644

Amortization of capitalized interest
 
46

 
46

 
41

 
10

 
2

Distributed income of equity investees
 
5,618

 
46,305

 
11,352

 
8,335

 

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest capitalized
 
(11
)
 
(204
)
 
(1,208
)
 
(330
)
 
(82
)
Preference security dividend of subsidiaries
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(82,226
)
 
(3,313
)
Total earnings
 
$
279,593


$
212,754

 
$
155,013

 
$
(337,696
)
 
$
(403,369
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expensed and capitalized
 
270,823

 
304,085

 
344,777

 
367,870

 
64,397

Amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
 
18,699

 
13,186

 
14,823

 
85,108

 
41,233

Estimate of interest within rental expense
 
696

 
762

 
615

 
238

 
14

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
290,218

 
$
318,033

 
$
360,215

 
$
453,216

 
$
105,644

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
 
0.96
x
 
0.67
x
 
0.43
x
 
(0.75
)x
 
(3.82
)x
Deficiency
 
$
10,625


$
105,279

 
$
205,202

 
$
790,912

 
$
509,013





Exhibit 12.1
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS


The following table sets forth the Company's consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the periods as shown (dollars in thousands):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before income (loss) from equity investees
 
$
55,614

 
$
(79,534
)
 
$
(143,495
)
 
$
(716,701
)
 
$
(505,620
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed charges
 
362,110

 
389,925

 
432,107

 
535,442

 
108,957

Amortization of capitalized interest
 
46

 
46

 
41

 
10

 
2

Distributed income of equity investees
 
5,618

 
46,305

 
11,352

 
8,335

 

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest capitalized
 
(11
)
 
(204
)
 
(1,208
)
 
(330
)
 
(82
)
Preference security dividend of subsidiaries
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(71,892
)
 
(82,226
)
 
(3,313
)
Total earnings
 
$
351,485

 
$
284,646

 
$
226,905

 
$
(255,470
)
 
$
(400,056
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expensed and capitalized
 
270,823

 
304,085

 
344,777

 
367,870

 
64,397

Amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
 
18,699

 
13,186

 
14,823

 
85,108

 
41,233

Estimate of interest within rental expense
 
696

 
762

 
615

 
238

 
14

Preference security dividend of subsidiaries
 
71,892

 
71,892

 
71,892

 
82,226

 
3,313

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
362,110

 
$
389,925

 
$
432,107

 
$
535,442

 
$
108,957

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
 
0.97
x
 
0.73
x

0.53
x
 
(0.48
)x
 
(3.67
)x
Deficiency
 
$
10,625

 
$
105,279

 
$
205,202

 
$
790,912

 
$
509,013




Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of VEREIT, Inc.

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
257 W. Genesee, LLC
 
New York
 
ARC AAABNIN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC AACMBPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC AAGWDSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC AASLGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC AASNAKS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC AATVLPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC AAWRNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC ACAWBWI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC ACLSHIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC ASDTNGA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC ASFVLAR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC BBSTNCA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC BJMKCSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC BWNCNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CAFEHLD001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CAFEUSA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBALPPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBALYPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBAQAPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBATAPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBBFDOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBBMNGA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBBRFPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBBSNGA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBBTLPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBCCGIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBCLEPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBCNGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBCPHPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBCTCIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBDCRMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBDLBPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBDLSPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBDXHPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBEHNCT001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBEPRVA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBEREPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBFDCPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBFLNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBGBGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBGCYPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC CBGCYPA002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBGSDPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBHBGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBHSPPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBHSTPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBHTNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBKNENH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBKNGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBKSNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBKZNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBLBLPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBLCRPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBLCRPA002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBLTBPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBLTZPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMBGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMBNNC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMCRNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMCRNH002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMCRPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMDFMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMDNMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMFDPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMHLPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMLNNJ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMRSPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMTLPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMTNMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBMTPPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBNPRRI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBNSNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBOCYPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBOFSIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBOHLIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBOMTPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBOSPNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA003, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA004, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA005, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA006, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA007, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA008, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA009, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC CBPBGPA010, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPBGPA011, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPDAPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPDAPA002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPDAPA003, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPLMNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPMAOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBPTNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBRDGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBRDGPA002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBRNDMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBSCGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBSLMNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBSPGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBSVNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBTBYMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBTCKPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBTMPPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBTRNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBUDYPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBVRNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWBMMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWDLPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWFDPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWGVPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWHNPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWMNDE001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWMNDE002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBWSKVA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CBYRKPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CFMEZZ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CKAKNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CKMTZGA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVCOLSC002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVFLDPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVHDYVA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVLVGNV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVMCBPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVNCTPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVSCDFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVSPGPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC CVTDAPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DBPCFBR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DBPGDYR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DBPORBR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC DBPPROP001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGBCDTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGDRDMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGFLTMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGHHLSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGHPRKS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGLBKTX003, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGLBKTX004, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGMHDMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGNBFTX003, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGSNTTX003, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC DGSSOMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FDCWLTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FDHTNNV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FDLLKNV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FDRGYCO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FDTLSOK001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FDWLSNV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEDMSIA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEHBTTN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEHZDKY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEINDKS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FELBNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FELDNKY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FELWLAR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEMTPPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEOMKWA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEOTWIA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEPDAPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FERDCSD001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FERVLMN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEWTLIA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FEYMAAZ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FMABONC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FMARAIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FMCGOIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FMFLYAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FMFRHAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC FMJSNMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC GEAUBAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC GMGVAIL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC GSSPRMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC HBRHLNC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC HRPBPAA001 SPE, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC HRPBPAA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC HRPBPAA002, DST
 
Delaware
 
ARC HRPBPAB001 GP, L.L.C.
 
Delaware
 
ARC HRPBPAB001, LP
 
Illinois
 
ARC HRPBPAB002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC HRPBPCC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC HRPWARI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC HVVMNSD001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KFCPTCA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KGBTVAR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KGLWLAR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KHHWLMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KLORLFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KLPHCAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KLSNVGA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC KLTCLAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC LWWDMME001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC MFLFTLA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC PRRCRNY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC QBGBCMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC RALXNKY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC RBCSRNJ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC RMWFDKS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC RRINSIN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBANDSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBHDNFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBLWSFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBMDNTN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBMMIFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBODOFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBPCAFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SBRWLGA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC SEHPNVA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TBHGHMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TBLVLMA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TDFMTME001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TKDBNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TRSEAWA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TSGRYLA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TSLBSCA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TSNGNMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TSOCTAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TSPSWNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC TSPYMNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WDJKVFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGABOPR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC WGACWGA002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGAKNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGANDIN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGBPTWV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGBPTWV002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGCDVTN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGCLBMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGCSRCO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGDNVCO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGESYSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGETNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGGVLSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGJKNMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGLNPMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGLPSPR001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGLVSNV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGMEMTN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGNCNSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGPORAZ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGTLQOK001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WGTRYMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WSOLBMS001 Holder, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC WSOLBMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 AAHUSTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 AAHUSTX002, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGAMTIL01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGAVSMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGCADMI01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGCDTLA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGCFDVA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGCMOTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGCTNMI01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGCWYMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGDVLVA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGEDWMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGFSTOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGFYTNC01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGGDRFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGGDRLA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGGFDOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGGVLMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGGVLTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGHSGVA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGHWLVA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGKGCMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC3 DGLFDTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGLKGMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMGMLA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMHNLA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMLNWI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMLOFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMNGWI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMTLMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGMVLMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGNMSOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGOIBNC01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGORNMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGOZKMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGPGSTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGPLCOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGPTCTN001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGPTTTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGPYNOH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGRDLAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGRGCTX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGRMATX001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGRWDLA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGSBRMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGSCRMO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGSKNMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGSNSWI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGTLSAL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGVASNC01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGVNAMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 DGWGVMS001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FDBLXMS01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FDCRRMS01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FDGPTMS01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FDKNSTX01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FEBMTNH001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FEEWCWA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FEKKMIN01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FEORTNY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FEPBGWV001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 FEQNCIL01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 GSCOCFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 GSCRGCO001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 GSGRAID01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 GSSTUFL001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 TSATNNJ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARC3 WGCLACA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 WGMPWNJ001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 WGSTNNY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARC3 WGSTVMI001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCenters Operating Partnership, L.P.
 
Delaware
 
ARCP Canadian Withholding Agent ULC
 
Nova Scotia, Canada
 
ARCP CV Baton Rouge LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Bossier City LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Enterprise AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Greeneville TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Knoxville (Kingston) TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Metairie (David) LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Selma AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Slidell (Brownswitch) LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP CV Tunkhannock PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DG Monticello KY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DGGFDMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DGNWTOK01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DGPLSPA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DGSYKPA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DGWATPA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP DGWNAMO01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD 2014 SLB Portfolio II, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD 2014 SLB Portfolio III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD 2014 SLB Portfolio IV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD 2014 SLB Portfolio V, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD 2014 SLB Portfolio VI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD 2014 SLB Portfolio VII, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD Broad Top PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FD Portfolio IX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FDCCC1402, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FDCCC1404, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FDCCC1405, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FE Bel Aire KS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FE Columbia MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FE Marcy NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FE Tulsa OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP FEMGYNY01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP GP OFC El Segundo CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP GSFRENY001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP GSPLTNY01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP GSWARPA001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP ID Mesa Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP ID Mohnton PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP JDDPTIA01, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
ARCP MBDLSTX01, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Amherst NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Annandale NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Colorado Springs CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Covington KY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Dublin OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC El Segundo CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Foxboro MA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Malvern PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Mesa Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP OFC Schaumburg IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio II, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio IV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio IX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio V, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio VI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio VII, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio VIII, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL Portfolio X, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL/OG Edmonton (171st Street) AB, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL/OG Edmonton (Gateway Blvd NW) AB, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL/OG Langhorne PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL/OG Salisbury MD, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL/OG Winnipeg MB, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP RL/OG/BB/SB Pittsburgh PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP SN Mabelvale AR, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP Springing Member, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP TS Farmington NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP TS Silver City NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP WELET1401, LLC
 
Delaware
 
ARCP WGMRBSC001, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CA Portsmouth Investment Trust
 
Delaware
 
Capital Lease Funding Securitization LP
 
Delaware
 
Capital Property Associates Limited Partnership
 
Maryland
 
CapLease 2007-STL LLC
 
Delaware
 
Caplease Credit LLC
 
Delaware
 
Caplease Debt Funding, LP
 
Delaware
 
Caplease Investment Management, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CapLease Protective Trust
 
Virginia
 
Caplease Statutory Trust I
 
Delaware
 
CLF 1000 Milwaukee Avenue LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF 555 N. Daniels Way LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Ann Arbor LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
CLF Arlington GP LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Arlington LP
 
Delaware
 
CLF Breinigsville Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF Breinigsville Holding Company LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Cane Run Louisville, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Cane Run Member, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Cheyenne Tulsa Member, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Cheyenne Tulsa, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Columbia LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Cooper Franklin LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Elysian Fields LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Farinon San Antonio LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF FBI Albany LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Fort Wayne LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Fort Worth GP LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Fort Worth LP
 
Delaware
 
CLF Fresno Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF Grassmere Nashville LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Herndon LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Holding Company, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF JCI Florida LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Lakeside Richardson LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Landmark Omaha LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Lathrop Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF McCullough Drive Charlotte LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF New Falls Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF OP General Partner LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Park Ten Houston LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Parsippany LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Pulco One LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Pulco Two LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Real Estate LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Red Lion Road Philadelphia Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF Ridley Park Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF Sawdust Member, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Sierra LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Simi Valley Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF SSA Austin GP LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF SSA Austin LP
 
Delaware
 
CLF VA Ponce LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF WAG Rosemead LLC
 
Delaware
 
CLF Westbrook Malvern Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CLF Yolo County Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
CNL Funding 2000-A, LP
 
Delaware
 
CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, LP
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
CNL Net Lease Funding 2003, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Bedford IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Bethel OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Bonita Springs FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Canton OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Crestwood KY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Delaware OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Franklin IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Grand Rapids MI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Hillview KY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Holland OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Houston (Aldine) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Howell MI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Janesville WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Lehigh Acres FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Salem OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Sapulpa OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Sylvania OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AA Twinsburg OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Abilene TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Albuquerque (Lomas Blvd) NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Albuquerque NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Alexandria LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Arlington TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Baton Rouge (College Dr) LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Baton Rouge (George O'Neal Rd) LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Baton Rouge LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Bossier City LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Clovis NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Denver CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Durango CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB El Paso TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Farmington NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Fort Collins CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Fort Worth (Clifford St) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Fort Worth (Oakmont) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Fort Worth (Sycamore School Rd) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Fort Worth TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Lafayette LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Lake Havasu City AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Los Lunas NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Mesa AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Midland TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Odessa TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Phoenix AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole AB Scottsdale AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Silver City NM, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Tucson (Grant Rd) AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Tucson AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Weatherford TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AB Yuma AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Acquisitions I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AN Portfolio II, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AN Portfolio IV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AN Portfolio V, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AN Portfolio VI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Anchored Center Operating Partnership, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole Anchored Center REIT Advisors, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Anchored Center REIT Advisors, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Anchored Center Trust, Inc.
 
Maryland
 
Cole AP Chambersburg PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AP Horn Lake MS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AP Memphis TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AS Austin TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AS Killeen TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AS Montgomery AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AT Dallas TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AW Johnston IA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Blanchester OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Hamilton OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Hartville OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Mount Orab OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Nashville TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Pearl River LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Rapid City SD, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole AZ Trenton OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BB Montgomery AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BB Southaven MS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BF Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BJ Portfolio I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BJ Portfolio II, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BN North Bay Village FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole BO Phoenix AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CA Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Capital Advisors, Inc.
 
Arizona
 
Cole Capital Corporation
 
Arizona
 
Cole Capital Partners, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Cole CCPT III Acquisitions, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CG Blair NE, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CH/MG Flanders NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole CM Austin TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Collateralized Senior Notes II, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Cole Collateralized Senior Notes III, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Cole Collateralized Senior Notes IV, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Cole Collateralized Senior Notes, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Cole Corporate Income Advisors II, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Corporate Income Advisors III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Credit Property Trust VI, Inc.
 
Maryland
 
Cole Credit Property Trust VII, Inc.
 
Maryland
 
Cole CU Arlington TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Auburndale FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Boca Raton (Yamato) FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV City of Industry CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Dover DE, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Evansville IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Ft. Myers FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Gainesville TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Gulf Breeze FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Jacksonville FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Lawrence KS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Lawrenceville NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Lynchburg VA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Madison Heights VA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Meridianville AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Mineola NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Naples FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV New Port Richey FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Southaven (Goodman) MS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Southaven MS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV The Village OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Titusville PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Weaverville NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole CV Whiteville NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole DG Porter IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole DG Thomaston GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole DST Advisors, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole EK Philadelphia PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FD Portfolio I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FD Portfolio II, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FD Portfolio III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FD Portfolio IV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FD Portfolio VIII, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FE Beekmantown NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FE Dublin VA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FE Effingham IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole FE Lafayette IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole FE Northwood OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GC Monroeville PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GC Toledo OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GG Broken Arrow OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP CCPT I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP CCPT III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP CV City of Industry CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP LA Highland CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP MT Folsom CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP MT Redding CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP OF Oceanside CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP TS Dixon CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GP WG Lancaster CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Growth Opportunity Fund I GP, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole GY Cumming (Old Atlanta) GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HA Rural Hall NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HC Ft. Wayne IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HC Willow Grove PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HD San Diego CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole HD Slidell LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HD Tucson AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HG Hot Springs (Central) AR, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HG Hot Springs AR, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HH North Fayette PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HL Concord NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HL Logan UT, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HN Buffalo NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole HT Durham NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole ID Charleston TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole ID Chattanooga TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole ID Milton PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole IO Conway NH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole IO Dover NH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole IO Rochester NH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole KO Brownsville TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole KO Fort Dodge IA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole KO McAllen TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole KO Monrovia CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole KO Tavares FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LA Dallas TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LA Denton TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LA Duncanville TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LA Easton PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LA Glendale AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole LA Highland CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole LA Oakdale MN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LO Miamisburg OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LO Sanford ME, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole LO Ticonderoga NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MezzCo CCPT I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MezzCo CCPT III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MG/OB Mt. Laurel NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MG/OB W. Windsor NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MP PM Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Bartlett IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Bethlehem GA (JV), LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Chesterfield MI (JV), LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Cleveland TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Daytona Beach FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Evans GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Flagstaff AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Folsom CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Highland Ranch CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Hixson TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Lake Charles LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Las Vegas NV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Melrose Park IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Mishawaka IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Pace FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Port Arthur TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Redding CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Ringgold GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT San Marcos TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT South Bend IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT South Elgin IL (JV), LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Sunset Valley TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole MT Uniontown PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole NB Nashville TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole NT Ocala FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Columbus OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Concord Mills NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Kansas City MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Lee's Summit MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Lubbock TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Mesa AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Novi MI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Oklahoma City OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Peoria AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB Rockwall TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole OB Rogers AR, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OB W. Springfield MA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Bedford MA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Bradenton FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Duluth GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Glenview IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Hopewell Township NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Kennesaw GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Lincoln NE, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Lincolnshire IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Nashville TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Oceanside CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Parsippany NJ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Phoenix AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Plano (Legacy) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Plano TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Pleasanton CA (JV), LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OF Urbana MD, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OFC Baton Rouge LA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OFC Omaha NE, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Operating Partnership I, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole OR Christiansburg VA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OR Highlands TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OR Houston TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OR San Antonio TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole OU Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole PM Parma OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole PM Phoenix AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole PX Mountain Brook AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV) Advisors, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT Advisors III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT Advisors IV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT Advisors V, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT Advisors VI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT Advisors VII, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT Advisors, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole REIT III Operating Partnership, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole RT Houston TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole Springing Member, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole ST Houston TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TH Evansville (Rosenberger) IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TH Franklin Park IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TH Jeffersonville IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TH Oaklawn IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TH Terre Haute IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole TK Auburndale FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Alton IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Augusta ME, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Ballinger TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Belchertown MA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Dixon CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Franklin NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Gibsonia PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Glenpool OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Hamilton OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Irmo SC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Jackson CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Jefferson City MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Kenedy TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Lawrence KS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Little Rock AR, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Macedon NY Holdings, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Macedon NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Murphy NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Nixa MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Pearsall TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Sedalia MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Sellersburg IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Southwick MA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS St. John IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Stillwater OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Summerdale AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Topeka KS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Troy MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Union MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TS Wauseon OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TT Downingtown PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole TY Coral Springs FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole UL Jackson TN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole VS Corpus Christi (Padre Island) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole VS Mission (Highway 83) TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WF Hillsboro OR (JV), LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WF Hinsdale IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Appleton (Northland Avenue) WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Appleton WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Augusta ME, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Baytown TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Beloit WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Birmingham AL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Boulder CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole WG Cahokia IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Cape Carteret NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Cleveland (Clark) OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Durham (Highway 54) NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Durham NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Edmond OK, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Fayetteville NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Fort Mill SC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Framingham MA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Goose Creek SC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Grayson GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Greenville NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Independence MO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Janesville (West Court) WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Janesville WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Kingman AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Lafayette IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Lancaster CA, LP
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Lancaster SC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Lawrence KS, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Leland NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Loves Park IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Matteson IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Medina OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG North Mankato MN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Omaha NE, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Rocky Mount NC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG South Bend (Ironwood) IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG South Elgin IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG St. Charles IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Tucson (Harrison) AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Twin Falls ID, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Warner Robins GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Watertown NY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WG Xenia OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WM Lancaster SC, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WM Pueblo CO, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WW Gap PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WW Portsmouth VA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WY Portfolio NV, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole WY Portfolio WA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole/Faison JV Bethlehem GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole/Faison MT Bethlehem GA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole/Mosaic JV South Elgin IL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Cole/NAP Spring Hill FL (JV), LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
Cole/NFR JV Hillsboro OR, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Columbia Pike I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRE JV Mixed Five MI 6 Branch Holdings LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRE JV Mixed Five NH Branch Holdings LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRE JV Mixed Five PA Branch Holdings LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRE JV Mixed Five VT Branch Holdings LLC
 
Delaware
 
CREI Advisors, LLC
 
Arizona
 
CRI CACT, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRI REIT I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRI REIT VI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
CRI REIT VII, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Diamond Real Estate, LLC
 
Delaware
 
DRE Holdings, LLC
 
Delaware
 
EFA Asset Management, LLC
 
Delaware
 
EFA Investments, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Equity Fund Advisors, Inc.
 
Arizona
 
EVA LLC
 
Delaware
 
KDC Busch Boulevard LLC
 
Delaware
 
KDC Norman Woods Business Trust
 
Virginia
 
MC South Elgin, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Net Lease Funding 2005, LP
 
Delaware
 
PREFCO Dix-Neuf LLC
 
Connecticut
 
PREFCO Fifteen GP LLC
 
Connecticut
 
PREFCO Nineteen Limited Partnership
 
Connecticut
 
PREFCO Quinze LLC
 
Connecticut
 
Series A DST Depositor, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Series A, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Series B DST Depositor, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Series B, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Series C DST Depositor, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Series C, LLC
 
Arizona
 
Series D DST Depositor, LLC
 
Delaware
 
Series D, LLC
 
Arizona
 
SR/CLF Sawdust Venture LLC
 
Delaware
 
SWA Remainder IV LLC
 
Delaware
 
USRP Funding 2001-A, L.P.
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Acquisitions, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT BE Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT CAB Portfolio, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Canadian Withholding Agent, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT CNL Funding 2000-A GP, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT CNL Net Lease Funding 2001 GP, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT DU Avon OH, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT DU Waukesha WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT GF Weatherford TX, LLC
 
Delaware
 



Exhibit 21.1

Entity Name
 
Jurisdiction of Formation/Incorporation
VEREIT GSA Services, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT ID Mesa Portfolio (Carriage Point Drive), LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT ID Nicholasville KY, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Income Properties III, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Income Properties, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT LD Breinigsville PA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT LD Fort Wayne IN, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT LD Lathrop CA, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT MT Fort Myers FL, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT MT Oak Creek WI, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT MT Tucson (Houghton) AZ, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Net Lease Funding 2005 GP, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Partners, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Real Estate GP, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Real Estate, L.P.
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Realty Advisors, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Services, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT Springing Member, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT T5 Portfolio I, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT TRS Corp.
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT USRP Funding 2001-A GP, LLC
 
Delaware
 
VEREIT, Inc.
 
Maryland
 




Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-211204 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-176714 and 333-192587 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 21, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 2018



Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-211204-01 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 21, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2017.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 2018



Exhibit 31.1




VEREIT, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Glenn J. Rufrano, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)


Exhibit 31.2



VEREIT, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Bartolotta, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
 
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)



Exhibit 31.3


VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Glenn J. Rufrano, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Chief Executive Officer of VEREIT, Inc., the sole general partner
 
 
of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)




Exhibit 31.4

VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Bartolotta, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
 
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
 
 
VEREIT, Inc., the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)



Exhibit 32.1

VEREIT, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Glenn J. Rufrano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Exhibit 32.2

VEREIT, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Bartolotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
 
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Exhibit 32.3

VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Glenn J. Rufrano, Chief Executive Officer of VEREIT, Inc., the sole general partner of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
Chief Executive Officer of VEREIT, Inc., the sole general partner
 
 
of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Exhibit 32.4

VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Bartolotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VEREIT, Inc., the sole general partner of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
February 21, 2018
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 
 
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
 
 
VEREIT Inc., the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.