UNITED STATES
SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
Commission File No. 001-10171
| KonaTel, Inc. |
| (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter) |
| Delaware | 80-0973608 | |
| (State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
500 N. Central Expressway, Ste. 202 Plano, Texas 75074 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
| -323-8410 |
| (Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o |
| Non-accelerated filer x | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
| Smaller reporting company x | Emerging Growth company o |
| 1 |
Our website is KonaTel.com.
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
On June 30, 2021, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $14,735,983, based upon 18,842,286 shares of the Registrant’s common stock being currently owned by such persons, and based upon the closing price of the common stock of the Registrant on the OTC Markets Group Inc. (“OTC Markets”) “OTC Pink Tier” (“KTEL”) of $0.78 per share on June 30, 2021.
As of December 31, 2021, the Registrant had shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding.
REFERENCES
In this Annual Report, references to “KonaTel, Inc.,” “KonaTel,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and words of similar import, refer to KonaTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, formerly named Dala Petroleum Corp., which is the Registrant, and our wholly owned subsidiaries, KonaTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“KonaTel Nevada”), Apeiron Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Apeiron Systems” or “Apeiron”), IM Telecom, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company doing business as “Infiniti Mobile” (sometimes called “IM Telecom” or “Infiniti Mobile”).
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time the statements are made and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report. We cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate, and therefore, prospective investors are encouraged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. You should carefully read this Annual Report completely, and it should be read and considered with all other reports filed by us with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Summaries of all agreements or other documents referenced herein and attached hereto by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15, or otherwise, do not purport to be all inclusive of the terms, conditions and other provisions of such agreements or documents, and accordingly, all such summaries are modified in their entirety to the referenced and Hyperlinked respective agreement or document in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.
| 2 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| 3 |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Corporate History and Business Development
We were incorporated as “Light Tech, Inc.” under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 24, 1984. A subsidiary in the name “Westcott Products Corporation” was organized by us under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 24, 1986, for the purpose of changing our name and domicile to the State of Delaware. On June 27, 1986, we merged with the Delaware subsidiary, with the survivor being Westcott Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation. At that time, all of our prior operations were conducted through Lee Building Products and T. A. Kilgore & Company, which owned and operated a home center in League City, Texas, about 30 miles southeast of downtown Houston, Texas. During 1990, we ceased these operations, and the secured lenders took possession our assets.
We changed our name to “Dala Petroleum Corp.” on August 29, 2014; and then to “KonaTel, Inc.” on February 5, 2018, following the closing of two respective mergers that are discussed below.
On March 11, 2000, our Board of Directors began the process of re-entering the development stage, and on June 2, 2014, we completed a merger with Dala Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (respectively, “Dala Nevada” and the “Dala Merger”). Dala Nevada was wholly owned by Chisholm Partners II, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (“Chisholm II”). We operated as an early-stage oil exploration company focused on our leased acreage acquired by Dala Nevada until 2016, when Chisholm II returned a total of 8,567,800 shares of the 10,000,000 shares of our common stock exchanged under the Dala Merger to us for cancellation in exchange for our assignment of approximately 55,000 acres, more or less, of our leased acreage or approximately 68.75% of our total holdings, to Chisholm II. All of our remaining oil and gas leasehold interests, comprising leases covering approximately 7,489 and 403 acres, more or less, expired in 2017 and 2018, respectively.
On July 20, 2017, pursuant to a Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 19, 2017, M2 Equity Partners, LLC, a privately held Minnesota limited liability company (“M2”), acquired 12,100,000 shares of our common stock in consideration of the sum of $367,500, which resulted in a change in control of our Company.
On November 13, 2017, we filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware, which removed all of the designations of our preferred stock from our Certificate of Incorporation, while reserving our 50,000,000 authorized and unissued one mill ($0.01) par value shares of preferred stock for future issuance as the Board of Directors may designate and approve. See Part IV, Item 15, Exhibit 3(i).
Effective December 18, 2017, we completed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “KonaTel Merger Agreement”) with KonaTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “KonaTel Nevada”), under which KonaTel Nevada became our wholly owned subsidiary on the closing of the merger (the “KonaTel Nevada Merger”), and we succeeded to the business operations of KonaTel Nevada.
Effective February 7, 2018 (dated as of February 5, 2018), we entered into an Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Membership Interest (the “PSMI”), with the transaction documents being deposited in escrow on February 7, 2018, respecting the acquisition of 100% of the membership interest in IM Telecom, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, (doing business as “Infiniti Mobile”) (“IM Telecom” or “Infiniti Mobile), from its sole owner, Trevan Morrow (“Mr. Morrow”). The principal asset of IM Telecom, at that time, was a “Lifeline Program” license of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) (an FCC approved wireless Compliance Plan).
On August 9, 2018, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Telecon Wireless Agreement”) with Telecon Wireless Resources, Inc., a New York corporation (the “Telecon Wireless”), whereby we sold various assets, including furniture, fixtures, equipment, account receivable and a customer list, among other assets and liabilities. Additional information on the Telecon Agreement can be accessed in Part IV, Item 15 hereof, under the heading “Telecon Wireless Sale Current Report.”
Effective December 31, 2018, we completed an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Apeiron Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (respectively, “Apeiron Systems” and the “Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement”), under which Apeiron Systems became our wholly owned subsidiary on the closing of the merger (the “Apeiron Systems Merger”). We issued 7,000,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Apeiron Systems, to Apeiron Systems’ two (2) shareholders, Joshua Ploude (6,300,000 shares) and Vyacheslav Yanson (700,000 shares), pro rata, in accordance with their respective equity interests in Apeiron Systems. Closing conditions to the Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement included, among other conditions, that the Apeiron Systems shareholders would have a $1.00 per share “Guaranteed Value” on the KonaTel shares they received under the Apeiron
| 4 |
Systems Merger if the KonaTel shares do not trade at or above $1.00 for ten (10) consecutive days during the period commencing on December 31, 2020, and ending December 31, 2021, on the applicable trading market for our common stock during that period, and subject to such shares being continuously owned of record by the Apeiron Systems shareholders, as outlined in Section 5.10 of the Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement. This condition was fully satisfied effective June 16, 2021. See the Company’s 8-KA Current Report dated and filed with the SEC on that date and which is available by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15.
On April 14, 2020, our operating subsidiaries made loan applications to participate in the Small Business Administration’s (the “SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) created under the “Cares Act” as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 15, 2020, the loan applications of Apeiron Systems, IM Telecom and KonaTel Nevada were approved and loan proceeds in the amounts of $101,800, $20,900 and $186,300, respectively, were received. We followed all prescribed loan forgiveness guidelines provided by our local bank and the SBA by using these loan proceeds to fund employee payroll through the 60-day period ending on June 15, 2020. All PPP loans were forgiven by the SBA in 2021.
On December 14, 2020, the shares of the Company’s common stock were approved for up listing to the OTC Markets OTCQB® Venture Market (“OTCQB”). OTCQB is a venture market operated by the OTC Markets. To be eligible for quotation on the OTCQB, companies must be current in their reporting obligations under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and undergo an annual verification and management certification process. Companies must also meet a minimum bid price test and other financial conditions. The OTC Markets is recognized by the SEC as a “Qualified Interdealer Quotation System” (“IDQS”) under SEC Rule 15c2-11(e)(6); and the OTCQB is an established public market that provides current public information to investors that need to analyze, value and trade securities.
On August 25, 2021, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC on Form S-8 to register 5,901,884 shares of its common stock underlying granted and unexercised employee incentive stock options under its 2018 Incentive Stock Option Plan.
BUSINESS
KonaTel Nevada was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 14, 2014, by its founder and then sole shareholder, D. Sean McEwen, to conduct the business of a full-service cellular provider that delivered cellular products and services to individual and business customers in various retail and wholesale markets. Through its sales network, it provided these services nationwide. In furtherance of its proposed business, on November 1, 2014, it acquired most of the assets of Coast to Coast Cellular, Inc. (“Coast to Coast”), including inventories, property, plant and equipment and its customer list, all valued at approximately $950,000 net of liabilities in the approximate amount of $415,000; and on November 1, 2016, it acquired the assets of CS Agency LLC (“CS Agency”), consisting of contract rights related to the cellular industry, in consideration of assuming liabilities of CS Agency in the approximate amount of $300,000. With the completion of the KonaTel Nevada Merger, we succeeded to the current and intended business operations of KonaTel Nevada.
On December 31, 2018, we acquired Apeiron Systems (www.apeiron.io) (“Apeiron Systems” or “Apeiron”), which is also our wholly owned subsidiary. Apeiron was organized in 2013 and is an international hosted services Communications Platform as a Service (“CPaaS”) provider that designed, built, owns and operates its national private core network, supporting a suite of business communications services, all accessible via proprietary Applications Programming Interfaces (“APIs”). As an FCC licensed Internet Telephony Service Provider (“ITSP”), Apeiron also holds an FCC numbering authority license. Some of Apeiron’s hosted services include Voice over IP (“VoIP”), cellular and Over-The-Top (“OTT”) telephony, SMS/MMS messaging and broadcast services, numbering features, including Cloud IVRs, Voicemail, Fax, Call Recording and other services through local, toll-free and international phone numbers. Supported by its national redundant network, Apeiron also provides public and private IP network services, including Multiprotocol Label Switching (“MPLS”), Dedicated Internet and LTE Wireless WAN solutions. Apeiron’s cloud services include Information Data Dips, Software-Defined Wide Area Networking (“SD-WAN”) and Internet of Things (“IoT”) data and device management. Apeiron primarily distributes its services nationally through its website, its sales staff, independent sales agents, and Independent Sales Organizations (“ISOs”).
On February 5, 2018, we entered into a purchase agreement to acquire IM Telecom (www.infinitimobile.com), doing business as Infiniti Mobile (“IM Telecom” or “Infiniti Mobile”). On October 23, 2018, the FCC approved our acquisition of IM Telecom, and on January 31, 2019, we completed the purchase of IM Telecom. IM Telecom operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of KonaTel. It is an FCC licensed Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (“ETC”) and is one of twenty-two (22) original FCC licensed wireless cellular resellers to hold an FCC approved Lifeline Compliance Plan since 2012, of which approximately twelve (12) license holders remain active today. The FCC has not approved (granted) a new wireless reseller Lifeline Compliance Plan since 2012. As a licensed ETC, IM Telecom is currently authorized to distribute Lifeline subsidized mobile voice/data service in nine (9) states. In addition to Lifeline, IM Telecom is also an FCC licensed Emergency Broadband Benefit (“EBB”) provider, authorized to distribute EBB subsidized high-speed mobile data service in the forty-eight (48) contiguous states plus Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico. EBB is expected to be replaced by the Affordable Connectivity Program (“ACP”) in 2022 under new terms and conditions. Lifeline is an FCC program that provides subsidized, fixed or mobile telecommunications services to low-income Americans. EBB is an FCC program that provides subsidized
| 5 |
high-speed wireless data services to low-income Americans. IM Telecom distributes Lifeline and EBB services under its Infiniti Mobile brand name through its website, sales staff, retail location and ISOs. IM Telecom also offers non-Lifeline and non-EBB services throughout the United States.
Apeiron Systems is headquartered in Los Angeles, California. It also has some management staff in Plano, Texas, customer service and software engineering resources staffed in Johnstown, Pennsylvania and software engineering services staffed in Europe and Asia. IM Telecom is headquartered in Plano, Texas, and operates a retail operation in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
We are headquartered in Plano, Texas, shared with IM Telecom’s offices. Apeiron Systems has thirteen (13) full-time employees; IM Telecom has four (4) full-time employees and two (2) part-time employees; and we have four (4) full-time employees.
Principal Products or Services and their Markets
Our principal products and services, across our two wholly owned subsidiaries, Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom, include our CPaaS suite of services (SIP/VoIP, SMS/MMS), wholesale and retail mobile voice and mobile data IoT services, wholesale voice termination services, and our ETC and EBB subsidized services for low-income Americans. Except for our ETC Lifeline services distributed in up to nine (9) states and our EBB services distributed in the forty-eight (48) contiguous states, Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, our Apeiron Systems’ products and services are available worldwide and subject to U.S., international and local/national regulations.
We generate revenue from two (2) primary sources, Hosted Services and Mobile Services:
| · | Our Hosted Services include a suite of hosted CPaaS services within the Apeiron Systems’ cloud platform, including Cloud IVRs, Voicemail, Fax, Call Recording and other services provided with local, toll-free and international phone numbers. Apeiron also delivers public and private IP network services from its national redundant network backbone, including MPLS, Dedicated Internet and LTE Wireless WAN solutions. Additionally, Apeiron’s Cloud Services include Information Data Dips, SD-WAN and IoT data and device management. These Hosted Services are marketed nationally and internationally through the Apeiron website, its sales staff, independent sales agents and ISOs. |
| · | Our Mobile Services include retail and wholesale cellular voice/text/data services and IoT mobile data services through our subsidiaries Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom. Mobile voice/text/data and IoT mobile data services are supported by a blend of reseller agreements with select national wireless carriers and national wireless wholesalers. A wireless communications service reseller typically does not own the wireless network infrastructure over which services are provided to its customers. Mobile voice/text/data and mobile data solutions are generally sold as traditional post-paid service plans that may include voice/text/data or wireless data only plans. Sometimes equipment is provided, which can include, but is not limited to, phones, tablets, modems, routers and accessories. Also included in our Mobile Services segment is the distribution of government subsidized mobile voice service and mobile data service by IM Telecom under its Infiniti Mobile brand and FCC license to low-income American households that qualify for the FCC’s Lifeline mobile voice service program and/or the FCC’s temporary EBB mobile data program, with EBB to eventually be replaced by FCC’s ACP program in 2022. Even though government programs like Lifeline have existed since 1985, these programs, along with newer programs like the temporary EBB program and future ACP program, are subject to change and may have a material impact on our Mobile Services business if changed, reduced or eliminated. |
Distribution Methods of the Products or Services
We primarily distribute our Hosted Services through our website, sales staff, independent sales agents and ISOs. We primarily distribute our Mobile Services through our website, sales staff, retail location, independent sales agents and ISOs. In early 2021, we increased our Mobile Service online marketing effort and by the end of 2021, online mobile service distribution increased by approximately 320% compared to 2020 online distribution.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and the Names of Principal Suppliers
Wholesale wireless services are sourced either directly from the wireless carrier or from wholesalers that sit between us (Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom) and the wireless carrier. Carriers can include Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T. Wholesalers can include Prepaid Wireless Group (“PWG”) and Telispire.
Wireless resellers like us traditionally do not own the wireless infrastructure over which services are provided. We purchase services from the following sources:
| · | Telispire: Verizon voice, text and data service. Telispire, through a contract with us, has set per unit pricing for voice, text, and data wireless services. Pricing per unit is in the form of a monthly recurring charge (“MRC”) that may or may not include minutes of use, text units or data units. Additional data units are available for purchase; |
| 6 |
| · | AT&T: AT&T voice, text or data service and AT&T IoT service under a contract with us, has set “unit based” pricing for voice, text, and data and IoT wireless services. Pricing per unit is in the form of an MRC that may or may not include minutes of use, text units or data units. Additional data units are available for purchase; |
| · | Verizon Wireless VPP, a Verizon IoT product: Verizon VPP, also through a contract with us, has set per unit pricing for IoT wireless services. Pricing per unit is in the form of an MRC that includes data units with defined over plan use pricing; |
| · | Sprint: Sprint voice, text or data service. Sprint, through a contract with us, has set pricing for bundled voice, text and data wireless services. Pricing bundles are in the form of an MRC that include minutes of use, text units or data units. Bundled plans include unlimited talk, text and a set amount of data. Larger data plans are available for purchase for consumers requiring larger data packages; and |
| · | Prepaid Wireless Group (“PWG”): T-Mobile voice, text or data Lifeline service. PWG, through a contract with us, has set pricing for bundled voice, text and data wireless services. Pricing bundles are in the form of an MRC that include minutes of use, text units or data units. Larger data plans are available for purchase for consumer requiring larger voice and data packages. |
Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts
Our wholly owned subsidiary, IM Telecom, is an FCC licensed ETC and is one of the original twenty-two (22) FCC licensed wireless cellular resellers to hold an FCC approved wireless Lifeline Compliance Plan in the United States since 2012, of which approximately twelve (12) license holders remain active today. As a licensed ETC, IM Telecom is currently authorized to distribute Lifeline subsidized mobile voice/data service in nine (9) states. IM Telecom is also an FCC licensed EBB carrier, authorized to distribute EBB subsidized mobile data services in the forty-eight (48) contiguous states and Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico. Infiniti Mobile also offers non-Lifeline and non-EBB services.
We hold a United States Patent and Trademark Office registered trademark “Lifeline+®” and use this Trademark in our marketing materials.
Competition
The telecommunications industry is highly competitive. Our primary cellular competitors include other resellers and national carriers, such as AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile. These national cellular carriers are facility-based, are significantly larger than us and enjoy trade name and trademark public recognition, as well as greater resources, scale, and competitive advantages, among other substantial factors, as compared to us. In addition, our cellular competitors also include numerous smaller regional carriers, existing MVNOs and ETCs, such as Metro PCS, Cricket Wireless, TracFone Wireless, QLink Wireless, TruConnect, and Assurance Wireless, many of which offer or may offer cellular, mobile data, Lifeline and EBB services along with no-contract postpaid and prepaid service plans. Our CPaaS competitors include, but are not limited to, Twilio, Plivo, Bandwidth, Thinq, VoIP Innovations, Telnyx, Coredial, Vonage/Nexmo, CLX Comm, Genband Kandy, Tropo, Telestax, 2600Hz, and Signal Wire. Competitive factors within the telecommunications industry include pricing, market saturation, service and product offerings, customer experience, network investment and quality, development and deployment of technologies, and regulatory changes. Some competitors have shown a willingness to use aggressive pricing as a source of differentiation. Other competitors have sought to add ancillary services, like mobile video, to enhance their offerings. Taken together, the competitive factors we face continue to put pressure on margins as companies compete to retain their current customer base and continue to add new developments, many proprietary or patented, and customers.
Need for any Governmental Approval of Principal Products or Services
On October 23, 2018, the FCC approved our acquisition of IM Telecom, an FCC licensed wireless Lifeline carrier. In 1985, during the Reagan administration, the FCC established the Lifeline Assistance program through generic powers afforded the FCC under Communications Act of 1934. Cellular service was added to the Lifeline program in 2009. Approximately nineteen (19) ETCs hold an FCC approved wireless reseller Lifeline Compliance Plan, but only about twelve (12) are active today. The FCC has not approved any new wireless reseller Lifeline Compliance Plans since 2012. Approximately one-half of our future gross revenues may come from government subsidized mobile voice and mobile data service.
Existing and Probable Government Regulation to Our Current and Intended Business
The FCC has a number of complex requirements and proceedings that affect our operations and that could increase our costs or diminish our revenues. For example, the FCC has rules regarding provision of 911 and E-911 services, porting telephone numbers, roaming, disabilities access, privacy and cyber security, consumer protection, and the universal service and Lifeline programs, including eligibility, reimbursement and program requirements. Many of these and other issues are being considered in ongoing
| 7 |
proceedings, and we cannot predict whether or how such actions will affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Our ability to provide services and generate revenues could be harmed by adverse regulatory action or changes to existing laws and regulations. In addition, regulation of companies that offer competing services can impact our business indirectly.
Smaller Reporting Company
We are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act, and we are subject to the disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K of the SEC, as a “smaller reporting company.” That designation will relieve us of some of the informational requirements of Regulation S-K and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the SEC.
Emerging Growth Company
In 2020, our “emerging growth company” designation as defined in the “Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012,” or the “JOBS Act,” expired as of the fifth anniversary of our initial registered public offering. During our “emerging growth company” designation we did not utilize any financial statement waivers as a result of that designation.
Sarbanes/Oxley Act
We are also subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes/Oxley Act created a strong and independent accounting oversight board to oversee the conduct of auditors of public companies and strengthens auditor independence. It also requires steps to enhance the direct responsibility of senior members of management for financial reporting and for the quality of financial disclosures made by public companies; establishes clear statutory rules to limit, and to expose to public view, possible conflicts of interest affecting securities analysts; creates guidelines for audit committee members’ appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of public companies’ auditors; management assessment of our internal controls; auditor attestation to management’s conclusions about internal controls; prohibits certain insider trading during pension fund blackout periods; requires companies and auditors to evaluate internal controls and procedures; and establishes a federal crime of securities fraud, among other provisions. Compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act could substantially increase our legal and accounting costs.
Exchange Act Reporting Requirements
Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act requires all companies with securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC regarding proxy solicitations, as outlined in Regulation 14A. Matters submitted to our shareholders at a special or annual meeting thereof or pursuant to a written consent will require us to provide our shareholders with the information outlined in Schedules 14A or 14C of Regulation 14; preliminary copies of this information must be submitted to the SEC at least 10 days prior to the date that definitive copies of this information are forwarded to our shareholders.
We are required to file annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the SEC on a regular basis, and are required to timely disclose certain material events (e.g., changes in corporate control; acquisitions or dispositions of a significant amount of assets other than in the ordinary course of business; and bankruptcy) in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Number of Total Employees and Number of Full-Time Employees
Across our companies, we have a total of twenty-three (23) employees; twenty-one (21) full-time employees and two (2) part-time employees.
Subsidiaries
We have three (3) wholly owned operating subsidiaries: KonaTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation; IM Telecom, LLC (d/b/a Infiniti Mobile) an Oklahoma limited liability company; and Apeiron Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation. Our subsidiary KonaTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation, has remained inactive since the start of 2021.
Additional Information
You may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also find all the reports or registration statements that we have previously filed electronically with the SEC at its Internet site at www.sec.gov in the Edgar Archives of the SEC.
| 8 |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
As we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Section 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information under this Item or in our annual or quarterly reports filed with the SEC; however, we believe this information may be of value to our shareholders or potential investors in our Company for this filing. These risk factors should be considered in light of the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” at the forepart of this Annual Report. We reserve the right not to provide risk factors in our future filings. Our primary risk factors and other considerations include:
Risks Related to the Company
We have a limited operating history and cannot ensure the long-term successful operation of our business or the execution of our business plan.
We have a limited operating history, having commenced our business operations in November of 2014, and our wireless marketing technology and solutions are an evolving business offering. As a result, investors have a limited track record by which to evaluate our future performance. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by growing companies in new and rapidly evolving markets. We may be unable to successfully accomplish and fund our current endeavors, which would materially impact our ability to implement our business plan, including:
| · | establishing and maintaining broad market acceptance of our technology, solutions, services and platforms, and converting that acceptance into direct and indirect sources of revenue; |
| · | establishing and maintaining adoption of our technology, solutions, services and platforms in and on a variety of environments, experiences and types of devices; |
| · | timely and successfully developing new technologies, solutions, services and platform features, and increasing the functionality and features of our existing technologies, solutions, services and platform offerings; |
| · | developing technologies, solutions, services and platforms that result in a high degree of customer satisfaction and a high level of end-customer usage; |
| · | successfully responding to competition, including competition from emerging technologies and solutions; |
| · | developing and maintaining strategic relationships to enhance the distribution, features, content and utility of our technologies, solutions, services and platforms; |
| · | identifying, attracting and retaining talented engineering, network operations, program management, technical services, creative services and other personnel at reasonable market compensation rates in the markets in which we employ such personnel; and |
| · | integration of potential evolving offerings of products and acquisitions. |
Our business strategy may be unsuccessful, and we may be unable to address the risks we face in a cost-effective manner, if at all. If we are unable to successfully accomplish these tasks, our business will be harmed, and we may fail.
For the year end December 31, 2021, we reported gross revenues of $12,834,844, cost of revenues of $7,105,464, operating expenses of $5,091,033, other expenses of ($15,361) and net income of $622,986. We anticipate additional revenue and net income growth in 2022, further reducing our accumulated deficit balance.
For the prior year ended December 31, 2020, we reported gross revenues of $9,358,999, cost of revenues of $5,823,552, operating expenses of $3,895,466, other income of $598,637 and net income of $238,618.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had $833,016 in non-cash depreciation/amortization expense, which was mostly exhausted at the end 2021. As of December 31, 2021, our accumulated deficit was $5,345,504.
| 9 |
The United States Government’s dissolution or reduction of the Lifeline Program or the elimination of “resellers” of these services would have a substantial adverse effect on our current and planned business operations.
| · | Considering there are approximately 6,600,000 current Lifeline users and approximately 34,300,000 eligible Lifeline customers (according to USAC), this would be a draconian move; however, it is a possibility. Federal or state governmental agencies could also significantly reduce or delay Lifeline reimbursement payments to Lifeline carriers, forcing Lifeline carriers to continue to provide minimum Lifeline services and at a reduced reimbursement rate. Depending on any reimbursement reduction, a reduction would diminish earnings and could make Lifeline unprofitable. The FCC established the Lifeline program in 1985 to ensure that qualifying low-income consumers could afford phone service and the opportunities and security it provides. Congress supported and strengthened Lifeline in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, requiring that affordable service and advanced communications be available to low-income consumers across the country. |
| · | Lifeline and EBB require several factors to be successful. The impact of negative governmental changes and negative national carrier pricing have been outlined above. In addition to those two risks, an interruption to the supply of low-cost phones and/or a reduction of Lifeline agents (no access to or not enough access to agents) would have a negative impact on Lifeline and/or EBB. |
| · | Adequate equipment financing and available cash resources to pay up-front commission payments (sometimes required) is critical to facilitate Lifeline, EBB, B2B and retail sales, and the lack of these resources would have a negative impact on our business. |
The increase in the number of resellers of services and products that we provide by any national carrier could saturate the markets and market segments of our targeted customers, which could affect our business adversely.
Market saturation could occur when a national carrier allows too many resellers into the market and margins drop so low where the reseller business model is no longer profitable, and our business may suffer and fail.
A decrease in the amount of wholesale voice and mobile data available to purchase from wholesale aggregators could cause a substantial reduction in our business and customers.
We purchase a portion of our mobile data service (“IOT”) directly from national carriers and purchase the remainder of our wholesale voice and mobile data from wholesale aggregators or MVNEs like PWG and Telispire. If one of these aggregators vacated the market, such action could strand many resellers of these services, like us, and could substantially reduce our current and anticipated revenues from our IoT or cellular service.
A wireless reseller could gain a significant price advantage over other wireless resellers by entering into a special national carrier pricing agreement not available to other resellers.
Any special national carrier pricing agreement that was not available to us would allow that particular reseller to “undercut” all other resellers. This scenario could also apply to a national wireless carrier acquiring a reseller then allowing that reseller to operate with special wholesale pricing not available to other resellers. This scenario has happened in the past with Cricket Communications, Inc. and Ultra Mobile, resellers that were acquired by a national carrier. Any such event could have a substantial adverse impact on our business and revenues.
Adequate funds for our current and intended operations may not be available, requiring us to raise additional financing or curtail our current and planned operations significantly.
We might be required to raise additional funding through public or private debt or equity financings. Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to our current shareholders and may be completed at a discount to the then-current market price of our common stock. Debt financing, if available, would likely involve restrictive covenants on our operations or pertaining to future debt or equity financing arrangements. Nevertheless, we may not successfully complete any future equity or debt financing. Adequate funds for our operations, whether from financial markets, collaborative or other arrangements, may not be available when needed or on terms attractive to us. If adequate funds are not available, our plans to operate our business may be adversely affected, and we could be required to curtail our activities significantly and/or cease operations.
We will be unable to implement our business plan if we cannot raise sufficient capital and may be required to pay higher prices for capital based on the current illiquid market for our common stock, among other factors.
| 10 |
We may need to raise additional capital to implement our business plan and meet financial obligations as they come due. If we do need to raise additional capital, and cannot attract sufficient capital from customary sources, we may be required to pay a higher price for capital.
Factors affecting the availability and price of capital may include the following:
| · | the availability and cost of capital generally; |
| · | our financial results; |
| · | the experience and reputation of our management team; |
| · | market interest, or lack of interest, in our industry, industry segments and our business plan; |
| · | the trading volume of, and volatility in, the market for our common stock, assuming there is a reasonable trading market for our common stock; |
| · | our ongoing success, or failure, in executing our business plan; |
| · | the amount of our capital needs; and |
| · | the amount of debt, options, warrants and convertible securities that may be outstanding in our Company at any time. |
A national carrier (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile or Sprint) could dissolve, reduce or restrict any wholesale program, agent program or reseller program. This includes both voice and data IoT, which would adversely affect our business.
We, like all voice and data resellers, are dependent on the FCC licensed national carriers to provide services that can be resold for a profit. The wireless carriers own/control their respective network (towers) and provide the wireless service. Resellers do not own their own network and are dependent on the national carriers to provide a reseller program. These carriers could eliminate a reseller program or implement new policies that could reduce profit margins making any applicable program unprofitable. They could also implement market restorations reducing markets we could sell into, which would have a direct adverse effect on our current and future prospects.
Similarly, one of these national carriers could reduce their own retail pricing, with no corresponding reduction in their wholesale pricing, which could create a situation where a reseller is unable to make enough profit to sustain operations. This has happened in the past with Verizon until Verizon’s wholesale (reseller) division finally reduced wholesale prices.
We may be unable to meet our current or future obligations or to adequately exploit existing or future opportunities if we cannot raise sufficient capital. If we are unable to obtain any required capital for an extended period of time, we may be forced to discontinue or curtail our business operations and we may fail.
We expect that there will be significant consolidation in our industry. Our failure or inability to lead that consolidation would have a severe adverse impact on our access to financing, customers, technologies, and human resources.
Our industry is currently composed of a small number of substantial entities, and a relatively large number of small businesses, no single one of which is dominant, or which provides integrated solutions and product offerings incorporating much of the available technology. Accordingly, we believe that substantial consolidation of the smaller companies may occur in our industry in the near future as has occurred with many larger participants. If we do not play a positive role in that consolidation, either as a leader or as a participant whose capabilities and offerings are merged into a larger entity, we may be left out of this process, with product and service offerings of limited value compared with those of our competitors. Moreover, even if we lead the consolidation process, the market may not validate the decisions we make in that process and our business will suffer and may fail.
Our success depends on our product and service technologies achieving and maintaining widespread acceptance in our targeted markets.
Our success will depend to a large extent on broad market acceptance of our telecommunications solutions among our current and prospective customers. Our prospective customers may be unwilling to use our solutions for a number of other reasons, including preference for static advertising, lack of familiarity with our technologies, preference for competing technologies or perceived lack of reliability. We believe that the acceptance of our technologies by prospective customers will depend primarily on the following factors:
| · | our ability to demonstrate the economic and other benefits attendant to our products and services; |
| 11 |
| · | our customers becoming comfortable with using our telecommunications technologies; and |
| · | the reliability of these services and technologies. |
Because we do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, the failure to obtain anticipated orders or the deferral or cancellation of commitments could have an adverse effect on our business and future prospects.
Our business is characterized by short-term purchase orders and contracts that do not require that purchases be made. This makes forecasting our sales difficult. The failure to obtain anticipated orders and deferrals or cancellations of purchase commitments because of changes in customer requirements, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have experienced such challenges in the past and may experience such challenges in the future.
Most of our contracts are terminable by our customers with limited notice and without penalty payments, and early terminations could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Most of our contracts are terminable by our customers following limited notice and without early termination payments or liquidated damages due from them. In addition, each stage of a project often represents a separate contractual commitment, at the end of which the customer may elect to delay or not to proceed to the next stage of the project. We cannot assure you that one or more of our customers will not terminate a material contract or materially reduce the scope of any large project. The delay, cancellation, or significant reduction in the scope of a large project or a number of projects could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our industry is characterized by frequent technological change. If we are unable to adapt our products and services and develop new products and services to keep up with these rapid changes, we will not be able to obtain or maintain market share and our business may fail.
We must respond to changing technology and industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner. We may not be successful in using new technologies, developing new products and services or enhancing existing products and services in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Furthermore, even if we successfully adapt our products and services, these new technologies or enhancements may not achieve market acceptance. The market for our products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, heavy competition, and frequent new product and service introductions. If we fail to develop new products and services or modify or improve our existing products and services in response to these changes in technology, customer demands or industry standards, our products and services could become less competitive or obsolete.
A portion of our business involves the use of software technologies that we have developed or licensed. Industries involving the ownership and licensing of software-based intellectual property are characterized by frequent intellectual property litigation, and we could face claims of infringement by others in the industry. Such claims are costly and add uncertainty to our operational results.
A portion of our business involves our ownership and/or licensing of software. This market space is characterized by frequent intellectual property claims and litigation. We could be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights resulting in significant expense and the potential loss of our own intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties may assert copyright, trademark, patent, or other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business.
Any litigation to determine the validity of these claims, including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our business partners, regardless of their merit or resolution, would likely be costly and time consuming and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. If any such litigation resulted in an adverse ruling, we could be required to:
| · | pay substantial damages; |
| · | cease the development, use, licensing or sale of infringing products; |
| · | discontinue the use of certain technologies; or |
| · | obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third-party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. |
| 12 |
Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that interfere with, or exploit security flaws in, our products and services.
Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that make changes to our customers’ computer systems and interfere with the operation and use of our products or products that impact our business. These applications may attempt to interfere with our ability to communicate with our customers’ devices. The interference may occur without disclosure to or consent from our customers, resulting in a negative experience that our customers may associate with our products and services. These applications may be difficult or impossible to uninstall or disable, may reinstall themselves and may circumvent other applications’ efforts to block or remove them. The ability to provide customers with a superior interactive marketing technology experience is critical to our success. If our efforts to combat these malicious applications fail, or if our products and services have actual or perceived vulnerabilities, there may be claims based on such failures and our reputation may be harmed, which would damage our business and financial condition and our ability to continue our business.
We compete with other companies that have substantially greater resources, and we are at a distinct competitive disadvantage in our chosen industry.
The market for our products and service solution technologies is generally highly competitive, and we expect competition to increase in the future. Some of our competitors or potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we have. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of their products than we do.
We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products, services, and technologies. Successful new product and service introductions or enhancements by our competitors could reduce sales and the market acceptance of our products and services, cause intense price competition or make our products and services obsolete. To be competitive, we must continue to invest significant resources in research and development, sales and marketing and customer support. If we do not have sufficient resources to make these investments or are unable to make the technological advances necessary to be competitive, our competitive position will suffer, and we may fail. Increased competition could result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced margins, and loss of market share. Our failure to compete successfully against current or future competitors could also adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Our future success depends on key personnel and our ability to attract and retain additional personnel.
Our success is dependent upon attracting and maintaining key personnel, including our founder, Chairman and CEO, D. Sean McEwen, and various key executive employees, including Joshua Ploude from whom we acquired Apeiron Systems and who serves as CEO of Apeiron Systems, and Charles D. Griffin, our President and COO, among others, some of whom are listed in Part III, Item 10 of this Annual Report.
Further, if we fail to retain our key personnel or to attract, retain, and motivate other qualified employees, our ability to maintain and develop our business may be adversely affected. Our future success depends significantly on the continued service of our key technical, sales, and senior management personnel and their ability to execute our growth strategy. The loss of the services of our key employees could harm our business. We may be unable to retain our employees or to attract, assimilate, and retain other highly qualified employees who could migrate to other employers who offer competitive or superior compensation packages.
Unpredictability in financing markets could impair our ability to grow our business through acquisitions.
We anticipate that opportunities to acquire similar businesses will materially depend on the availability of financing alternatives with acceptable terms. As a result, poor credit and other market conditions or uncertainty in financial markets could materially limit our ability to grow through acquisitions since such conditions and uncertainty make obtaining financing more difficult.
Our reliance on information management and transaction systems to operate our business exposes us to cyber incidents and hacking of our sensitive information if our outsourced service provider experiences a security breach.
Effective information security internal controls are necessary for us to protect our sensitive information from illegal activities and unauthorized disclosure, in addition to preventing service attacks and corruption of our data. Further, we rely on the information security internal controls maintained by our outsourced service provider. Breaches of our information management system could also adversely affect our business reputation. Finally, significant information system disruptions could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage operations or reliably report results.
| 13 |
Because our technology, products, platforms, and services are complex and are deployed in and across complex environments, they may have errors or defects that could seriously harm our business.
Our technology, proprietary platforms, products, and services are highly complex and are designed to operate in and across data centers, large and complex networks and other elements of the digital media workflow that we do not own or control. On an ongoing basis, we need to perform proactive maintenance services on our platform and related software services to correct errors and defects. In the future, there may be additional errors and defects in our software that may adversely affect our services. We may not have in place adequate reporting, tracking, monitoring, and quality assurance procedures to ensure that we can detect errors in our software in a timely manner. If we are unable to efficiently and cost-effectively correct errors or other problems that may be identified, or if there are unidentified errors that allow persons to improperly access our services, we could experience loss of revenues and market share, damage to our reputation, increased expenses and legal actions by our customers and our business may fail.
We may have insufficient network or server capacity for our current and planned business, which could result in interruptions in our services and the loss of revenues resulting in a negative impact on our business.
Our operations are dependent, in part, upon network capacity provided by our telecommunications network and third-party telecommunications networks; data center services provider owned and leased infrastructure and capacity; server capacity located at the data center services provider partner or partners; and our own infrastructure and equipment. Collectively, this infrastructure, equipment and capacity must be sufficiently robust to handle all of our customers’ wireless requirements, particularly in the event of unexpected surges in high-definition video traffic and network services incidents. We may not be adequately prepared for unexpected increases in bandwidth and related infrastructure demands from our customers. In addition, the bandwidth we have contracted to purchase may become unavailable for a variety of reasons, including payment disputes, outages, or such service providers going out of business. Any failure of these service providers or our own infrastructure to provide the capacity we require due to financial or other reasons may result in a reduction in or the interruption of service to our customers, leading to an immediate decline in revenue and possible additional decline in revenue, as a result of subsequent customer losses, which could result in the cessation of all or part of our business operations.
We do not have sufficient capital to engage in substantial research and development, which may harm our long-term growth.
In light of our limited resources in general, we have made no substantial investments in research and development. This conserves capital in the short term. In the long term, as a result of our limited investment in research and development, our technologies and product offerings may not keep pace with the market, and we may lose any existing competitive advantage. Over the long term, this may harm our revenue growth and our ability to be profitable.
Our business operations are susceptible to interruptions caused by events beyond our control.
Our business operations are susceptible to interruptions caused by events beyond our control. We are vulnerable to the following potential problems, among others:
| · | our platform, technologies, products, services and underlying infrastructure, or that of our key suppliers, may be damaged or destroyed by events beyond our control, such as fires, earthquakes, pandemics, war, floods, power outages or telecommunications failures; |
| · | we and our customers and/or partners may experience interruptions in service as a result of the accidental or malicious actions of Internet users, hackers, hostile nation states or current /former employees; |
| · | we may face liability for transmitting viruses to third parties that damage or impair their access to computer networks, programs, data or information. Eliminating computer viruses and alleviating other security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessation of service to our customers; and |
| · | the failure of our systems or those of our suppliers may disrupt service to our customers (and from our customers to their customers), which could materially impact our operations (and the operations of our customers), adversely affecting our relationships with our customers and lead to lawsuits and contingent liabilities. |
The occurrence of any of the foregoing could result in claims for consequential and other damages, significant repair and recovery expenses and extensive customer losses and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
| 14 |
Our business operations could be impacted by the current world health crisis.
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus (the “Covid-19”) outbreak a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” and on March 10, 2020, declared it to be a pandemic. Actions taken around the world to help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus include restrictions on travel, and quarantines in certain areas, and forced closures for certain types of public places and businesses. The coronavirus and actions taken to mitigate it have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the geographical areas in which we operate. While it is unknown how long these conditions will last and what the complete financial affect will be on us, to date, and as a result of actions taken by management to mitigate a material impact to our financial statements or our operational results, we are not currently experiencing a material impact to our financial statements or our results of operations; however, a pandemic typically results in social distancing, travel bans and quarantines, which may result in limited access to our facilities, customers, management, support staff and professional advisors. These, in turn, may not only impact our operations, financial condition and demand for our services, but our overall ability to react timely to mitigate the impact of this event. Given our small staff, if a key member of our team were disabled by COVID-19, it could have a material negative impact on our business. Also, it may substantially hamper our efforts to provide our investors with timely information and to comply with our filing obligations under the Exchange Act with the SEC. If this pandemic were to last a prolonged period of time, we could see a decline in revenue due to the closure of customer businesses, which could then impact our ability to pay our short-term debts. Our concentration of revenue from a small group of Apeiron Systems’ customers makes it reasonably possible that we are vulnerable to the risk of a long-term severe impact. Our dependence on certain suppliers to provide equipment to be distributed or sold to our customers could also be impacted if inventory shortages occur due to import or export restrictions resulting from the pandemic.
General global market and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and results of operations.
Our business has been and could continue to be affected by general economic and market conditions. Weakness in the United States and worldwide economy could have a negative effect on our operating results. Additionally, in a down-cycle economic environment, we may experience the negative effects of increased competitive pricing pressure, customer loss, slowdown in commerce over the Internet and corresponding decrease in traffic delivered over our network and failures by our customers to pay amounts owed to us on a timely basis or at all. Suppliers on which we rely for equipment, field services, servers, bandwidth, co-location, and other services could also be negatively impacted by economic conditions that, in turn, could have a negative impact on our business operations or revenues. Flat or worsening economic conditions may harm our operating results and financial condition.
The markets in which we operate are rapidly emerging, and we may be unable to compete successfully against existing or future competitors to our business.
The markets in which we operate are becoming increasingly competitive. Our current competitors generally include those that offer similar products and services. These competitors, including future new competitors who may emerge, may be able to develop comparable or superior solution capabilities, platforms, services, products and/or a series of services that provide a similar or more robust set of features and functionality than the technologies, products, and services we offer. If this occurs, we may be unable to grow as necessary to make our business profitable.
Regardless of whether we have superior products, many of these current and potential future competitors have a longer operating history in their current respective business areas and greater market presence, brand recognition, engineering, and marketing capabilities, and financial, technological and personnel resources than we do. Existing and potential competitors with an extended operating history, even if not directly related to our business, have an inherent marketing advantage because of the reluctance of many potential customers to entrust key operations to a company that may be perceived as unproven or in the early stage of its development. In addition, our existing and potential future competitors may be able to use their extensive resources:
| · | to develop and deploy new products and services more quickly and effectively than we can; |
| · | to develop, improve and expand their platforms and related infrastructures more quickly than we can; |
| · | to reduce costs, particularly hardware costs, because of discounts associated with large volume purchases and longer-term relationships and commitments; |
| · | to offer less expensive products, technologies, platforms and services as a result of a lower cost structure, greater capital reserves or otherwise; |
| 15 |
| · | to adapt more swiftly and completely to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements; |
| · | to take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more readily; and |
| · | to devote greater resources to the marketing and sales of their products, technology, platform, and services. |
If we are unable to compete effectively in our various markets, or if competitive pressures place downward pressure on the prices at which we offer our products and services, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer and our business may fail.
Compliance with the reporting requirements of federal securities laws can be expensive.
We are a public “reporting company” in the United States, and accordingly, subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and other federal securities laws, rules and regulations, including compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited and reviewed financial statements in reports filed with the SEC, along with required communications with our shareholders, are substantial. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur costs associated with becoming and continuing as a public company, including, but not limited to, legal, accounting, filing, and other related costs and expenses. Failure to comply with the applicable securities laws could result in private or governmental legal action against us or our officers and directors, which could have a detrimental impact on our business and financial condition, the value of our common stock and the ability of our shareholders to resell their common stock.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.
All future revenues are anticipated to be utilized for research, development, and the furtherance of our business plan and our technologies, products, services and platform, and accordingly, it is highly unlikely that you will receive any dividends from us in the near future, if ever.
We do not intend to provide guidance about future events in the foreseeable future.
Our Board of Directors anticipates adopting a policy that will preclude us from providing guidance about matters that may happen in the foreseeable future, though any such policy will not prohibit our responsibilities to provide forward-looking information to our shareholders and to the public in our Exchange Act filings with the SEC, including our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” required in a number of SEC reports and registration statements.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
There is a limited active trading market for our shares of common stock.
In general, there has been a limited trading volume in our common stock. The small trading volume will likely make it difficult for shareholders to sell their shares as and when they choose. Furthermore, small trading volumes are generally understood to depress market prices. As a result, you may not always be able to resell shares of our common stock publicly at the time and prices that you feel are fair or appropriate.
Additionally, if we do not timely file our reports required to be filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act, broker-dealers may not be able or willing to trade our common stock, and the OTC Markets will post adverse warnings on its website about such failures, which, unless such failures are corrected by us, could have an additional adverse impact on the viability of any market that may develop for our common stock. Other adverse warnings of the OTC Markets under their current and future policies could similarly have an adverse effect on any market for our common stock, and there is no assurance that we will be able to satisfy comments or concerns of the OTC Markets, if any are expressed.
If an active market for our common stock develops, there is a significant risk that the Company’s common stock price may fluctuate dramatically in the future in response to any of the following factors, some of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:
| · | variations in our quarterly operating results; |
| · | announcements that our revenue or income are below analysts’ expectations; |
| · | general economic slowdowns; |
| 16 |
| · | sales of large blocks of our common stock by insiders and others; and |
| · | announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital raises. |
Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC, which may make it more difficult for shareholders to sell our common stock.
The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9, which established the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of the Company’s common stock if and when such shares are eligible for sale and may cause a decline in the market value of its stock.
Because of increased regulatory efforts of governmental and quasi-governmental agencies regarding the trading of securities that are deemed to be penny stocks, the cost and expense of depositing and inducing a broker-dealer to effect sales of these shares is very costly, which can be in excess of value of the shares sought to be sold, and often includes requirements of legal opinions of both the selling shareholder’s counsel and the broker-dealer’s counsel, both at the expense of the selling shareholder.
Currently, broker-dealers require legal opinions of shareholders of almost all over-the-counter stocks to deposit and sell these shares, and all of these legal opinions are required to be paid for by the shareholder; and often, two (2) legal opinions are required, one (1) from the shareholder’s legal counsel and one (1) from the broker-dealer’s legal counsel. This policy has been required of mostly all low-priced over-the-counter shares, regardless of whether the shares have been registered with the SEC, or whether there is no legend on the stock certificate representing the shares and always if the shares are designated as “restricted securities.” Larger, national broker-dealers will generally not even trade these securities. The high cost of these types of legal opinions is often more than the value of the shares sought to be sold, and the process can take two (2) to three (3) weeks or more. Accordingly, shareholders with limited shares of low-priced stocks will be unable to economically sell their shares, regardless of whether an “established trading market” for the shares exists, and if they could sell their shares, the required selling process will inhibit their ability to sell the shares when they desire to sell their shares.
Because we became public by means of a reverse acquisition, we may not be able to attract the attention of brokerage firms.
Because we became public through a “reverse acquisition,” securities analysts of brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is little incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. Moreover, no assurance can be given that brokerage firms will want to conduct capital raises on our behalf, presently or in the future.
Our investors’ ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future.
In the future, we may issue additional authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of ownership interests of our present shareholders. We expect to need to issue a substantial number of shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exercisable for our common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, raising additional capital in the future to fund our operations and other business purposes. We currently offer incentive stock options for our officers, directors and certain significant employees and may extend this policy to others. Additional shares of common stock issued by us in the future will dilute an investor’s investment in the Company.
| 17 |
Directors, executive officers, principal shareholders, and affiliated entities own a significant percentage of our capital stock, and they may make decisions that our shareholders do not consider to be in their best interests.
As of the date of this Annual Report, D. Sean McEwen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns approximately 38% of our issued and outstanding shares of common voting stock by reason of his personal holdings. This percentage does not include certain vested incentive stock options that can be exercised within sixty (60) days of the date of this Annual Report, all of which options are described under the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards” of the caption “Executive Compensation” in Part III, Item 11, below, and a portion of which are reflected in Mr. McEwen’s beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in Part III, Item 12 hereof. As a result, Mr. McEwen may have the ability to substantially control the election of our board of directors, the outcome of issues requiring approval by our shareholders and other corporate actions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company that may be favored by other shareholders; and could prevent transactions in which shareholders might otherwise recover a premium for their shares over current market prices. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and board decision making could also harm the price of our capital stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our capital stock, whether by making a tender offer or attempting to obtain control of our Company. See the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” of Part III, Items 11 and 12, respectively, hereof.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner or detect fraud. Consequently, investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting, and this may adversely affect any trading price of our common stock that may then exist.
We must maintain effective internal controls to provide reliable financial reports and to detect and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as would be possible with an effective control system in place. We have not performed an in-depth analysis to determine if historical undiscovered failures of internal controls exist and may in the future discover areas of our internal controls that need improvement.
We are continually in the process of evaluating our internal controls for effectiveness as well as evaluating the need for additional internal controls. Failure to implement changes to our internal controls that we may deem to be ineffective or any others that we may identify as necessary to maintain an effective system of internal controls could harm our operating results and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. Any such loss of confidence could have a substantial negative affect on the trading price of our common stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
We do not own any property.
KonaTel, Inc. has a lease on the following property:
On December 18, 2020, we entered into a lease of an office suite in Plano, TX, which commenced on January 25, 2021. Lease payments were deferred until May 1, 2021. Commencing on May 1, 2021, lease payments are $3,650 per month for the twelve (12)-month period ended April 30, 2022. The lease term is for five (5) years.
Through our wholly owned subsidiary, IM Telecom, we have a lease on the following property:
Our Tulsa, Oklahoma retail storefront and office consisting of approximately 1,100 square feet and located at 3401 East Admiral Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74115, is under a lease that commenced February 1, 2019, and expires on November 30, 2021, at monthly rent of $950 for 2019 and $1,000 for 2020 and 2021. This lease is currently on a month-to-month term at a rate of $1,000 per month.
Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Apeiron Systems, we have leases on the following properties:
Our Culver City, California office is subleased from Chambers Design Group, consisting of approximately 1,636 feet, located at 5855 Green Valley Circle, Culver City, CA 90230, and expires May14, 2022, at a monthly rent of $4,663.
Our Johnstown, Pennsylvania office, consisting of approximately 1,500 square feet and located at 112 Lindberg Ave, Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15905, is under a lease that commenced April 15, 2019, and is under a month-to-month term at a monthly rent of $1,073.
| 18 |
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not party to any material legal proceedings
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None; not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Until December 14, 2020, our common stock was quoted on the OTC Pink Tier of the OTC Markets under the symbol “KTEL.” On December 14, 2020, our common was approved for up-listing on the OTC Markets’ OTCQB® Venture Market or the OTCQB Tier. No assurance can be given that any established trading market for our common stock will develop or be maintained.
For any market that develops for our common stock, the sale of shares of our common stock comprised of “restricted securities” pursuant to Rule 144 of the SEC, any other available exemption from registration under the Securities Act or by registration under the Securities Act by members of management or others, including any person to whom any such securities may be issued in the future, may have a substantial adverse impact on any such public market. For information regarding the requirements of resales under Rule 144, see the heading “Rule 144” of this Item below
The common stock that can be acquired under vested and exercised incentive stock options that we have granted may also have an impact on any public trading market in our common stock. See the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards” of the caption “Executive Compensation” in Part III, Item 11 hereof, for a description of all of our outstanding incentive stock options.
Also, see the heading “Risks Related to Our Common Stock” of the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A hereof.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated over the last two (2) years, the high and low closing bid quotations, as reported by the OTC and OTCQB Markets, and represents prices between dealers, does not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions:
These prices were obtained from OTC Markets and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions, retail markups, mark downs or commissions.
| 19 |
Rule 144
The following is a summary of the current requirements of Rule 144, excluding issues related to companies that are or have ever been a “shell company”:
| Securities | Affiliate or Person Selling on Behalf of an Affiliate | Non-Affiliate (and has not been an Affiliate During the Prior Three Months) | |||||
| Restricted Securities of Reporting Issuers |
During six-month holding period – no resales under Rule 144 Permitted.
After six-month holding period – may resell in accordance with all Rule 144 requirements including: *Current public information, Volume limitations, Manner of sale requirements for equity securities, and Filing of Form 144. *Current public information is continually required for resales under Rule 144 because the Company was a former “shell company.”
|
During six-month holding period – no resales under Rule 144 permitted.
After six-month holding period but before one year – unlimited public resales under Rule 144 except that the current public information requirement still applies.
After one-year holding period – unlimited public resales under Rule 144; need not comply with any other Rule 144 requirements. |
|||||
| Restricted Securities of Non-Reporting Issuers |
During one-year holding period – no resales under Rule 144 permitted.
After one-year holding period – may resell in accordance with all Rule 144 requirements including: Current public information, Volume limitations, Manner of sale requirements for equity securities, and Filing of Form 144. |
During one-year holding period – no resales under Rule 144 permitted.
After one-year holding period – unlimited public resales under Rule 144; need not comply with any other Rule 144 requirements. |
Holders
We currently have 561 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2021, not including an indeterminate number of shareholders who may hold their shares in “street name.”
Dividends
We have not declared any cash dividends with respect to our common stock, and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. All future earnings are anticipated to be utilized for research, development and the furtherance of our business plan and our technologies, products, services, and platform, and accordingly, it is highly unlikely that you will receive any dividends from us in the near future, if ever.
There are no material restrictions limiting, or that are likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our securities.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
There have been no sales by us of any unregistered securities during the past two (2) years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020.
Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities
None; not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Us and Affiliated Purchasers
None; not applicable.
ITEM 6: [RESERVED]
| 20 |
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
When used in this Annual Report, the words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27a of the Securities Act and Section 21e of the Exchange Act regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, operating results, and financial position. Persons reviewing this Annual Report are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those included within the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Such factors are discussed further below under “Trends and Uncertainties,” and also include general economic factors and conditions that may directly or indirectly impact our financial condition or results of operations.
Overview of Current and Planned Business Operations
We continue to pursue market opportunities for the distribution of our current products and services described in our “Principal Products or Services and their Markets” summary on page 6 of this Annual Report. In addition, we continue to pursue expanded market distribution opportunities, development of new products and services, the addition of new lines of business (i.e., the FCC’s anticipated ACP service expansion), and accretive acquisition opportunities that may enhance or expand our current product and service offerings.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2021, to the Year ended December 31, 2020
Results of Operations
In comparing our Statements of Operations between the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, we grew revenue, realized increased costs of revenue and operating expenses, and increased net income.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had $12,834,844 in revenues from operations compared to $9,358,999 in the prior year ended December 31, 2020, for a total revenue increase of $3,475,845 in 2021. The increase in 2021 revenue was caused by an increase in both our Hosted Services and Mobile Services segments, with Mobile Services expanding largely due to the introduction of the EBB program that added additional revenues for the distribution of high-speed mobile data service to low-income consumers.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, our cost of revenue was $7,105,464 compared to $5,823,552 in the prior year ended December 31, 2020, for a cost of revenue increase of $1,281,912 in 2021. Our 2021 cost of revenue increase was primarily the result of increased network, handset and sales commission costs related to distributing additional services.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had a gross profit of $5,729,380 compared to $3,535,447 in the prior year ended December 31, 2020, for a gross profit increase of $2,193,933 in 2021.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, total operating expenses were $5,091,033 compared to $3,895,466 in the prior the year ended December 31, 2020, for an increase of $1,195,567 in 2021. This increase was due primarily to increases in payroll and related expenses resulting mostly from the hiring of management level operations positions in both Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, other income (expense) was ($15,361) compared to $598,637 in the prior year ended December 31, 2020 (see Note to of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report).
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had net income of $622,986 compared to $238,618 in the prior year ended December 31, 2020.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2021, we had $932,785 in cash and cash equivalents on hand.
The ability to continue as a business is dependent upon our generating profitable operations in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve (12) months with revenues from our operations.
In comparing liquidity between the years ending December 31, 2021, and 2020, cash increased by 30.4%. The increase was the result of improved revenues and margins. Liabilities and total overall debt showed a 10% decrease in 2021 when compared to 2020. Our revolving lines of credit were eliminated through payments in 2020. Going forward, growth from new service offerings is expected to
| 21 |
provide additional liquidity for our business. Working capital increased by $1,943,386 for the year ended December 31, 2021, resulting from increases in cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
Our current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) was 2.91 as of December 31, 2021, and 0.94 in 2020.
Cash Flow from Operations
During the year ended December 31, 2021, and the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flow provided by operating activities was $211,929 and $571,546, respectively. Decreased cash flows provided by operating activities were primarily attributable to a material increase in inventory purchases to support increased distribution of Mobile Services.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, and the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flow used in investing activities was $(10,000) and ($10,833), respectively. The cash used in investing activities during 2021 was the result of the purchase of assets.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, and the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities was $15,661 and ($36,992), respectively. The funds provided by financing were comprised of cash received from the exercise of incentive stock options in 2021 of $110,000 and proceeds received from the PPP loans and notes payable of $548,900 in 2020. Cash flow used in financing activities in 2021 was ($94,339) for repayments of notes payable and repayments of amounts due to a related party ($151,357); repayment of revolving lines of credit ($12,237); repayment of notes payable ($112,168), and as part of the Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement’s “surplus net working capital settlement provision,” a paid-in-full payment paid as a dividend to the two (2) former Apeiron Systems shareholders of ($310,130) in 2020.
Going Concern
The Company generated net income of $622,986 during the year ended December 31, 2021. We had two (2) consecutive years of net income, in 2021 and 2020. The Company experienced positive cash flow of $217,590 and $523,721 in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2021, was $5,345,504, which continues to decline.
The Company has continued to ameliorate any substantial going concern doubt by generating additional cash flow in 2021 and 2020, respectively, and generating net income in 2021 and 2020. Reduction of costs in our Hosted Services and Mobile Services businesses and increase in revenues from the growth of our Mobile Services customer base has allowed the Company to retire debt and other lines of credit, all of which have contributed to an improvement in our working capital, without the use of lines of credit, borrowings or shareholder dilution.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company entered into an off-balance sheet arrangement as a result of the purchase of Apeiron Systems. The former Apeiron Systems stockholders had a $1.00 “Guaranteed Value” if the Company’s common stock trading price did not reach or exceed $1.00 per share over a ten (10) consecutive day period between December 31, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2021. This condition was fully satisfied effective June 16, 2021. See the Company’s 8-KA Current Report dated and filed with the SEC on that date and which is available by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the accompanying financial statements include the amortization period for intangible assets, valuation and impairment valuation of intangible assets, depreciable lives of the website and property and equipment, valuation of warrant and beneficial conversion feature debt discounts, valuation of share-based payments and the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
| 22 |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 360-10, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
We measure their financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses escrow liability and short-term loans the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
We have adopted accounting guidance for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices which are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB updated the accounting guidance related to leases. The most significant change in the updated accounting guidance requires lessees to recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all operating leases with the exception of short-term leases. The standard also expands the disclosures regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For a lessee, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease did not significantly change from previous guidance. We adopted the updated guidance on January 1, 2019 on a prospective basis and as a result, prior period amounts were not adjusted to reflect the impacts of the updated guidance. In addition, as permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, prior scoping and classification conclusions were carried forward for leases existing as of the adoption date.
Revenue Recognition
We earn revenue from contracts with customers, primarily through the provision of telecommunications and other services. We account for these revenues under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This standard update, along with related subsequently issued updates, clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard U.S. GAAP. The standard update also amends current guidance for the recognition of costs to obtain and fulfill contracts with customers such that incremental costs of obtaining and direct costs of fulfilling contracts with customers will be deferred and amortized consistent with the transfer of the related good or service. Revenue from these services is generally recognized monthly as the services are provided. Such revenue is recognized based on usage, which can vary from month to month or at a contractually committed amount, net of credits or other billing adjustments. Advance billings for future service in the form of monthly recurring charges are not recognized as revenue until the service is provided.
Stock-Based Compensation
We record stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC 718 which requires the Company to recognize expenses related to the fair value of its employee stock option awards. This requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award.
| 23 |
We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with ASC 718-10 and the conclusions reached by the ASC 505-50. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and loss carryforwards and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income (loss) in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect of a change in tax rules on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in operations in the year of change. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Tax benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized only if it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to sustain a position taken on an income tax return. We had no liability for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2021, and 2020. Interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized as interest expense. We do not have any accrued interest or penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits, nor was any significant interest expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020.
Earnings Per Share
We follow ASC Topic 260 to account for the earnings per share. Basic earnings per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation.
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 305 of SEC Regulation S-K provides that certain registrants are required to categorize market risk sensitive instruments into instruments entered into for trading purposes and instruments entered into for purposes other than trading purposes. Within both the trading and other than trading portfolios, separate quantitative information shall be presented, to the extent material, for each market risk exposure category (i.e., interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, and other relevant market risks, such as equity price risk). These requirements are not applicable to smaller reporting companies under subsection thereof.
(This space intentionally left blank)
| 24 |
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
KONATEL, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021, and 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(This space intentionally left blank)
| 25 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of KonaTel, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of KonaTel, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Stock Based Compensation
Description of the Matter:
As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements, the Company offers stock option awards that involve complex accounting estimates. Management evaluates the stock option awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation” and uses the Black Scholes Model to value the stock option awards. This model requires management to make assumptions, use judgment, and can be complex.
Auditing management's assessments and valuations can be complex, involves judgment, and requires a thorough understanding of award terms.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit.
We reviewed all contracts to obtain a thorough understanding of the terms. We tested the inputs and assumptions management used in the Black-Scholes Model. We reperformed the calculation of the stock-based compensation to test management’s valuations.
/s/ Haynie & Company
Haynie
& Company
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 14, 2022
PCAOB #457
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
| F-1 |
KONATEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 932,785 | $ | 715,195 | ||||
| Accounts Receivable, net | 1,274,687 | 434,801 | ||||||
| Inventory, Net | 566,839 | 17,786 | ||||||
| Prepaid Expenses | 79,467 | 2,365 | ||||||
| Other Current Asset | 164 | 194 | ||||||
| Total Current Assets | 2,853,942 | 1,170,341 | ||||||
| Property and Equipment, Net | 48,887 | 79,571 | ||||||
| Other Assets | ||||||||
| Intangible Assets, Net | 807,775 | 1,517,163 | ||||||
| Other Assets | 154,297 | 172,065 | ||||||
| Investments | 10,000 | |||||||
| Total Other Assets | 972,072 | 1,689,228 | ||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 3,874,901 | $ | 2,939,140 | ||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Current Liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses | $ | 930,449 | $ | 1,042,567 | ||||
| Note Payable - current portion | 94,339 | |||||||
| Right of Use Operating Lease Obligation - current | 50,672 | 66,323 | ||||||
| Deferred Revenue | 37,677 | |||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 981,121 | 1,240,906 | ||||||
| Long Term Liabilities | ||||||||
| Right of Use Operating Lease Obligation - long term | 136,445 | 15,399 | ||||||
| Note Payable - long term | 150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
| Total Long Term Liabilities | 286,445 | 165,399 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities | $ | 1,267,566 | $ | 1,406,305 | ||||
| Commitments and contingencies - Footnote 8 | ||||||||
| Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Common stock, $ par value, shares authorized, outstanding and issued at December 31, 2021 and outstanding and issued at December 31, 2020 | 41,615 | 40,692 | ||||||
| Additional Paid In Capital | 7,911,224 | 7,460,632 | ||||||
| Accumulated Deficit | (5,345,504 | ) | (5,968,489 | ) | ||||
| Total Stockholders’ Equity | 2,607,335 | 1,532,835 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 3,874,901 | $ | 2,939,140 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| F-2 |
KONATEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Revenue | $ | 12,834,844 | $ | 9,358,999 | ||||
| Cost of Revenue | 7,105,464 | 5,823,552 | ||||||
| Gross Profit | 5,729,380 | 3,535,447 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Payroll and Related Expenses | 2,702,495 | 2,117,713 | ||||||
| Professional and Other Expenses | 965,671 | 553,940 | ||||||
| Bad Debt | 31,318 | 2,313 | ||||||
| Utilities and Facilities | 146,254 | 129,396 | ||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | 833,016 | 848,865 | ||||||
| General and Administrative | 157,344 | 117,570 | ||||||
| Marketing and Advertising | 89,678 | 15,840 | ||||||
| Taxes and Insurance | 165,257 | 109,829 | ||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 5,091,033 | 3,895,466 | ||||||
| Operating Income/(Loss) | $ | 638,347 | $ | (360,019 | ) | |||
| Other Income and Expense | ||||||||
| Other Income | 625,591 | |||||||
| Interest Expense | (15,361 | ) | (26,954 | ) | ||||
| Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Total Other Income and Expenses | (15,361 | ) | 598,637 | |||||
| Net Income | 622,986 | 238,618 | ||||||
| Earnings per Share | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
| Weighted Average Outstanding Shares | ||||||||
| Basic | 40,909,085 | 40,692,286 | ||||||
| Diluted | 42,891,011 | 44,092,286 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
(This space intentionally left blank)
| F-3 |
KONATEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
| Common Shares | Additional | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Paid-in Capital | Deficit | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of January 1, 2020 | 40,692,286 | $ | 40,692 | $ | 7,380,029 | $ | (5,896,977 | ) | $ | 1,523,744 | ||||||||||
| Stock Based Compensation | — | 80,603 | 80,603 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dividends Paid to Apeiron Systems shareholders | — | (310,130 | ) | (310,130 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | — | 238,618 | 238,618 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2020 | 40,692,286 | $ | 40,692 | $ | 7,460,632 | $ | (5,968,489 | ) | $ | 1,532,835 | ||||||||||
| Exercised Stock Options | 923,120 | 923 | 109,077 | 110,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Stock Based Compensation | — | 341,515 | 341,515 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net Income | — | 622,986 | 622,986 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2021 | 41,615,406 | $ | 41,615 | $ | 7,911,224 | $ | (5,345,503 | ) | $ | 2,607,335 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
(This space intentionally left blank)
| F-4 |
KONATEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| For Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 622,986 | $ | 238,618 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | 833,016 | 838,003 | ||||||
| Bad Debt | 31,318 | 2,313 | ||||||
| Stock-based Compensation | 341,515 | 80,603 | ||||||
| Change In Right of Use Assets | (92,947 | ) | (1,994 | ) | ||||
| Change in Lease Liability | 105,395 | (368 | ) | |||||
| Amount recorded as loan forgiveness of SBA Covid-19 Loans | (319,000 | ) | ||||||
| Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts Receivable | (871,204 | ) | (59,629 | ) | ||||
| Inventory | (549,053 | ) | (13,127 | ) | ||||
| Prepaid Expenses | (77,102 | ) | (621 | ) | ||||
| Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses | (112,117 | ) | (182,443 | ) | ||||
| Deferred Revenue | (37,677 | ) | (15,397 | ) | ||||
| Customer Deposits | (31,087 | ) | ||||||
| Other Assets | 17,800 | 35,675 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 211,930 | 571,546 | ||||||
| Cash Flows from Investing Activities | ||||||||
| Purchase of Assets | (10,000 | ) | (10,833 | ) | ||||
| Net cash (used in) investing activities | (10,000 | ) | (10,833 | ) | ||||
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities | ||||||||
| Repayment on Revolving Lines of Credit | (12,237 | ) | ||||||
| Cash received from Stock Options Exercised | 110,000 | |||||||
| Proceeds from Federal SBA Covid-19 Loans | 468,900 | |||||||
| Repayments of amounts due to Related Party | (151,357 | ) | ||||||
| Repayments of amounts of Notes Payable | (94,339 | ) | (112,168 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from Notes Payable | 80,000 | |||||||
| Dividends Paid to Apeiron shareholders | (310,130 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 15,661 | (36,992 | ) | |||||
| Net Change in Cash | 217,591 | 523,721 | ||||||
| Cash - Beginning of Year | 715,195 | 191,474 | ||||||
| Cash - End of Period | $ | 932,785 | $ | 715,195 | ||||
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | ||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | 6,796 | 21,591 | ||||||
| Cash paid for taxes | ||||||||
| Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
| Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities | 199,245 | 28,576 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| F-5 |
KONATEL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Overview of Company
KonaTel Nevada (as defined below) was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 14, 2014, by its founder and then sole shareholder, D. Sean McEwen, to conduct the business of a full-service MVNO (“Mobile Virtual Network Operator”) provider that delivered cellular products and services to individual and business customers in various retail and wholesale markets.
KonaTel Inc., formerly known as Dala Petroleum Corp. (“KonaTel,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), also formerly known as “Westcott Products Corporation,” was incorporated as “Light Tech, Inc.” under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 24, 1984. A subsidiary in the name “Westcott Products Corporation” was organized by us under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 24, 1986, for the purpose of changing our name and domicile to the State of Delaware. On June 27, 1986, we merged with the Delaware subsidiary, with the survivor being Westcott Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Westcott”). On December 18, 2017, we acquired KonaTel, Inc, a Nevada sub S-Corporation (“KonaTel Nevada”), in a merger with our acquisition subsidiary under which KonaTel Nevada became our wholly owned subsidiary. At the closing of this merger, our IRS Federal EIN number was changed from 80-0000245 through customary processing, and EIN number 80-0973608 was assigned to us by the IRS on March 5, 2019.
On December 31, 2018, we acquired Apeiron Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation d/b/a “Apeiron” (“Apeiron Systems”), which is also our wholly owned subsidiary. Apeiron Systems was organized in 2013 and is an international hosted services CPaaS (“Communications Platform as a Service”) provider that designed, built, owns, and operates its private core network, supporting a suite of real-time business communications services and Applications Programming Interfaces (“APIs”). As an Internet Telephony Service Provider (“ITSP”), Apeiron Systems holds a Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) numbering authority license. Some of Apeiron Systems’ hosted services include SIP/VoIP services, SMS/MMS processing, BOT integration, NLP (“Natural Language Processing”), ML (“Machine Learning”), number services including mobile, toll free and DID landline numbers, SMS to Email services, Database Dip services, SD-WAN, voice termination, and numerous API driven services including voice, messaging, and network management.
On January 31, 2019, we acquired IM Telecom, an Oklahoma limited liability company, d/b/a Infiniti Mobile, (“IM Telecom” or “Infiniti Mobile”), which became our wholly owned subsidiary. Infiniti Mobile is an FCC licensed ETC (“Eligible Telecommunications Carrier”) and is one of nineteen (19) FCC licensed carriers to hold an FCC approved Lifeline Compliance Plan in the United States. Under the Lifeline program, Infiniti Mobile is currently authorized to provide government subsidized mobile telecommunications services to eligible low-income Americans currently in eight (8) states.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these financial statements include the allowance for doubtful receivables, allowance for inventory obsolescence, the estimated useful lives of property and equipment, and customer lists. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, include the Company and its three (3) wholly owned corporate subsidiaries, KonaTel Nevada, Apeiron Systems, and Infiniti Mobile (January through December). The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, include the Company and its three (3) wholly owned corporate subsidiaries, KonaTel Nevada, Apeiron Systems, and Infiniti Mobile (February through December). All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents include cash on hand and all short-term investments with maturities of three months or less.
| F-6 |
Trade Accounts Receivable
The Company accounts for trade receivables based on amounts billed to customers. Past due receivables are determined based on contractual terms. The Company does not accrue interest and does not require collateral on any of its trade receivables.
Allowance for Doubtful Receivables
The allowance for doubtful receivables is determined by management based on customer credit history, specific customer circumstances and general economic conditions. Periodically, management reviews our accounts receivable and adjusts the allowance based on current circumstances and charges off uncollectible receivables against the allowance when all attempts to collect the receivable have failed. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, management has determined that no allowance for doubtful receivables is necessary.
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of the cost of cellular phones and cellular accessories. Inventory is reported at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. As of December 31, 2021, total inventory owned by the company was $566,839.
Due to the rapidly changing technology within the industry, inventory is evaluated on a regular basis to determine if any obsolescence exists. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, the allowance for inventory obsolescence was $0.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful life, furniture and fixtures, equipment, and vehicles are depreciated over periods ranging from five to seven (5-7) years, and billing software is depreciated over three (3) years which represents the estimated useful life of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred while major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or sold, the cost and applicable accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the related gain or loss is recognized.
The Company recognizes impairment losses for long-lived assets whenever changes in circumstances result in the carrying amount of the assets exceeding the sum of the expected future cash flows associated with such assets. Management has concluded that no impairment reserves are required as of December 31, 2021, and 2020.
Intangible Assets – Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 360-10, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Other Intangibles
The Company accounts for other intangibles in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 360-10, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. During 2019, the Company, through the acquisition of IM Telecom, recorded, at fair market value, an FCC License in the amount of $634,251. Other Intangible Assets are not amortized. As of December 31, 2021, there is no impairment of the value of the license.
Other Assets
Other Assets represent items classified as long-term assets in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 210-10-45. Other Assets include vendor deposits and security deposits that the Company is required to maintain.
| F-7 |
Customer Deposits
Before entering into a contract with a sub-reseller customer, the Company requires the customer to either secure a formal letter of credit with a bank or require a certain level of cash collateral deposits from the customer. These collateral requirements are determined by management and may be adjusted upward or downward depending on the volume of business with the sub-reseller customer, or if management’s assessment of credit risk for a sub-reseller customer would change.
The Company held $0 in collateral deposits from various sub-reseller customers at December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Such amounts represent collateral received from the sub-resellers in order to contract with the Company. The related contracts have an option to terminate within a period of less than one (1) year, and accordingly, these collateral deposits are classified as current liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet.
Fair Market Value of Assets
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deposits received from customers for receivables and short-term loans the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Long-term assets purchased through acquisitions are valued at the Fair Market Value of the asset at the time of acquisition. The Fair Market Value is based on observable inputs of assets in active market- places for fixed assets, and estimations and assumptions developed by us for Other Intangibles.
The Company follows accounting guidance for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices, which are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB updated the accounting guidance related to leases. The most significant change in the updated accounting guidance requires lessees to recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all operating leases with the exception of short-term leases. The standard also expands the disclosures regarding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For a lessee, the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease did not significantly change from previous guidance. See NOTE 4.
Upon adoption, we recorded $151,471 for operating lease assets and liabilities, which includes the impact of fair value adjustments, prepaid and deferred rent. As of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, our operating lease assets and liabilities were $187,117 and $81,723, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Services revenues are generated from cellular and telecommunication services. The revenue is derived from wholesale and retail services. Telecommunications and mobile telecommunication services include network platforms, voice, data, and text services. The Company recognizes revenue as telecommunications and mobile services are provided in service revenue. Telecommunications and mobile services are billed and paid on a monthly basis. Services are billed and paid on a monthly basis. These bills include an amount for the monthly recurring charge and a usage charge.
We earn revenue from contracts with customers, primarily through the provision of telecommunications and other services. We account for these revenues under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This standard update, along with related subsequently issued updates, clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard U.S. GAAP. The standard update also amends current guidance for the recognition of costs to obtain and fulfill
| F-8 |
contracts with customers such that incremental costs of obtaining and direct costs of fulfilling contracts with customers will be deferred and amortized consistent with the transfer of the related good or service. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Deferred Revenue
Services for cellular and telecommunication services have a monthly recurring charge that is billed in advance. This charge covers a thirty (30) or thirty-one (31)-day period. This charge is deferred for the period in which it was received and recorded as revenue at the conclusion of this period. Costs, mainly from outside providers, associated with the deferred revenue are recognized in the same period as revenue is recognized.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of Revenue includes the cost of communication services, equipment and accessories, shipping costs, and commissions of sub-agents.
Advertising
Costs for advertising products and services, as well as other promotional and sponsorship costs, are charged to Selling, general and administrative expense in the periods in which they are incurred. Advertising expense was $89,678 and $15,840 for 2021 and 2020 respectively. The increase in advertising costs was a result of the expansion of the marketing of Infiniti Mobile via independent agents and local advertising efforts in Oklahoma.
Professional and Other Expenses
Previously for 2020, the Company presented certain professional fees and other expenses under the category of “Operating and Maintenance.” These expenses are now being presented under the category of “Professional and Other Expenses” as this change better represents the types of expenses that were incurred during 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC 718 which requires the Company to recognize expenses related to the fair value of its employee stock option awards. This requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award.
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from nonemployees in accordance with ASC 718-10 and the conclusions reached by the ASC 505-50. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services.
Income Taxes
Provisions for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated financial statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rate are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
The benefits of uncertain tax positions are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the uncertain tax positions will withstand challenge, if any, from taxing authorities. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Basic net income / loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income / loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income / loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income / loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. As of December 31, 2021, there are potentially dilutive common shares.
| F-9 |
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Numerator | ||||||||
| Net Income/Loss | $ | 622,986 | $ | 238,618 | ||||
| Denominator | ||||||||
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 40,909,085 | 40,692,286 | ||||||
| Dilutive impact of stock options | 1,981,926 | 3,400,000 | ||||||
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted | 42,891,011 | 44,092,286 | ||||||
| Net income per common share | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, cash, and cash equivalents.
All cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents are held at high credit financial institutions. These deposits are generally insured under the FDIC’s deposit insurance coverage; however, from time to time, the deposit levels may exceed FDIC coverage levels.
The Company has a concentration of risk with respect to trade receivables from customers and cellular providers. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had a significant concentration of receivables (defined as customers whose receivable balances are greater than 10% of total receivables) due from two (2) customers in the amounts of $783,431 or 63.9% and $194,647 or 15.9%. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a significant concentration of receivables from two (2) customers in the amounts of $194,509, or 52.4%, and $52,843, or 14.2%.
Concentration of Major Customer
A significant amount of the revenue is derived from contracts with major customers. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had two (2) customers that accounted for $5,494,625 or 42.8% of revenue and $3,617,833 or 28.2%, of the revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company had two (2) customers that accounted for $3,337,262 or 35.7% and $1,472,962 or 15.7% of revenue. The loss of a major customer would create a very negative impact on the Company, which would require the Company to make significant changes to reduce expenses. It should be noted that the primary major customer is the FCC through the federal Lifeline and EBB programs.
Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has evaluated all other recent accounting pronouncements and believes that none will have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statement.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS
Glosser Arbitration Settlement
In August 2019, the Company won an arbitration award (ratified by the court) from Mr. Glosser in the amount of $357,914, together with arbitrator’s compensation of $4,957, for a total award of $362,871; and Mr. Glosser’s counterclaim was found to be without merit. The Company and Mr. Glosser entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release on February 24, 2020, pursuant to which this matter was fully settled, resolving all claims, and Mr. Glosser paid the Company $300,000.
| F-10 |
Apeiron Systems Working Capital Settlement
On December 31, 2018, the Company and the shareholders of Apeiron Systems entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger. Section 2.2 Estimated Net Working Capital and Section 2.3 Final Settlement of that agreement provided for a method to calculate and reconcile any surplus or deficit in net working capital amounts as of December 31, 2018. On November 22, 2019, the Company, Apeiron Systems and the Apeiron Systems’ shareholders reached an agreement on the final surplus net working capital amount of $310,130 owed by Apeiron Systems to the Apeiron Systems shareholders under the Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement. The net working capital amount was deemed to be payable by Apeiron Systems to the Apeiron Systems shareholders pro rata: 90% or $279,117 to Joshua Ploude and 10% or $31,013 to Vyacheslav Yanson.
On February 14, 2020, the Company, on behalf of Apeiron Systems, made a partial payment of $5,000 towards the surplus net working capital balance of $31,013 Apeiron Systems owed to one (1) of its officers, Vyacheslav Yanson. On March 5, 2020, the Company, on behalf of Apeiron Systems, paid Mr. Yanson $26,013, representing the final payment of the surplus net working capital balance owed to Mr. Yanson. On March 8, 2020, the Company, on behalf of Apeiron Systems, paid another of its officers, Joshua Ploude, $225,000 towards the surplus net working capital balance owned to Mr. Ploude. The remaining surplus net working capital balance of $54,117 owed to Mr. Ploude was paid to Mr. Ploude during 2020. With the final payment of $54,117 paid to Mr. Ploude, the Company has fully satisfied its surplus net working capital obligation under the Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement.
Euler Hermes/Sky Phone Settlement
Between March and July of 2019, IM Telecom purchased wireless handsets from Sky Phone, LLC in the amount of $192,293. Subsequently, a dispute arose between the parties regarding the amount of the debt, a lack of sufficient transaction documentation and problems with some of the handsets. On or about December 2019, the debt was transferred to Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company. On April 22, 2020, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the matter whereby IM Telecom agreed to pay $80,000 in monthly payments of $4,000 over twenty (20) months. The first payment was made on May 20, 2020. As of August 2021, the settlement had been paid in full.
SBA Paycheck Protection Program
On April 14, 2020 the operating companies of the Company made loan applications to participate in the Small Business Administration’s (SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) created as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 15, 2020, the PPP loan applications of Apeiron Systems, IM Telecom and KonaTel Nevada were approved and loan proceeds in the amounts of $101,800, $20,900 and $186,300, respectively, were received. The Company followed all prescribed PPP loan forgiveness guidelines provided by our local bank and the SBA. As of December 31, 2021, all PPP loans have been forgiven by the SBA.
EIDL Loan
In 2020, the Company was granted a $150,000 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) from the SBA. The term of the loan is thirty (30) years, at an interest rate of 3.75% on advanced funds. Installment payments were to begin twelve (12) months following the loan date. The SBA has subsequently granted automatic deferments of payments through March of 2022.
NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of the following major classifications as of December 31, 2021, and 2020:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Leasehold Improvements | $ | 46,950 | $ | 46,950 | ||||
| Furniture and Fixtures | 102,946 | 102,946 | ||||||
| Billing Software | 217,163 | 217,163 | ||||||
| Office Equipment | 94,552 | 94,552 | ||||||
| 461,611 | 461,611 | |||||||
| Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (412,724 | ) | (382,040 | ) | ||||
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 48,887 | $ | 79,571 | ||||
Depreciation expense amounted to $30,683 and $30,783 for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Depreciation expense is included as a component of operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
| F-11 |
NOTE 4 – RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS
Right-of-Use Assets consist of assets accounted for under ASC 842. The assets are recorded at present value using implied interest rates between 3.29% and 5.34%. The Right-of-Use Assets were $173,524 and $80,578 in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company has right-of-use assets through leases of properties under non-cancelable leases. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had one (1) property with lease terms in excess of (1) year. This lease liability expires December 31, 2026. Lease payables as of December 31, 2020, are $81,722. Future lease liability payments under the terms of these leases are as follows:
| 2022 | $ | 58,547 |
| 2023 | $ | 45,578 |
| 2024 | $ | 46,596 |
| 2025 | $ | 47,615 |
| 2026 | $ | 11,967 |
| Total | $ | 210,304 |
| Less Interest | $ | 23,186 |
| Present value of minimum lease payments | $ | 187,117 |
| Less Current Maturities | $ | 50,672 |
| Long Term Maturities | $ | 136,445 |
The weighted average term of the right-to-use leases is 15.4 months recorded with a weighted average discount of 3.53%.
The Company also leases two (2) office spaces on a month-to-month basis. Total rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, amounted to $123,843 and $109,960, respectively.
NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible Assets with definite useful life consist of licenses, customer lists and software that were acquired through acquisitions:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Customer List | $ | 1,135,962 | $ | 1,135,962 | ||||
| Software | 2,407,001 | 2,407,001 | ||||||
| ETC License | 634,251 | 634,251 | ||||||
| Less: Amortization | (3,542,963 | ) | (2,740,629 | ) | ||||
| Net Amortizable Intangibles | 634,251 | 1,436,585 | ||||||
| Right of Use Assets - net | 173,524 | 80,578 | ||||||
| Intangible Assets net | $ | 807,775 | $ | 1,517,163 | ||||
Amortization expense amounted to $802,334 and $802,334 for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Amortization expense is included as a component of operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. With the exception of the license granted by the FCC, all intangible assets are fully amortized as of December 31, 2021.
Intangible Assets with indefinite useful life consist of the Lifeline license granted by the FCC. The license, because of the nature of the asset and the limitation on the number of granted Lifeline licenses by the FCC, will not be amortized. The license was acquired through an acquisition. The fair market value of the license as of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, was $634,251.
NOTE 6 – LINES OF CREDIT
The Company previously had two (2) lines of credit with a bank, which provided aggregate maximum borrowing availability of $1,050,000 as of 2020. The lines of credit were payable on demand and bore interest at a variable rate with rate ranges from 7.5% to 8.0%. The lines of credit matured in 2020 and were paid in full on January 5, 2020, and February 14, 2020, respectively. The Company had no outstanding lines of credit as of December 31, 2021.
| F-12 |
NOTE 7 – AMOUNT DUE TO STOCKHOLDER
The Company received a $200,000 advance from a shareholder in 2019, who is also the CEO of Apeiron Systems. The loan accrued interest at a range rate between 10% and 12%. As of October, 2020, the loan had been repaid.
NOTE 8 – CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
Litigation
From time to time, the Company may be subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2021, there are no such legal proceedings.
Contract Contingencies
The Company has the normal obligation for the completion of its cellular provider contracts in accordance with the appropriate standards of the industry and that may be provided in the contractual agreements.
Pursuant to an Independent Contractor Agreement (the “ICA”) effective October 17, 2019, between the Company and Charles L. Schneider, Jr., in the event that Infiniti Mobile was granted its request for ETC status from the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) to distribute Lifeline cellular phone service within the State of California, Mr. Schneider was to be granted a one (1) year warrant, with a customary “cashless” exercise feature, to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price to be determined on the date of any such approval. The ICA was for a term of one (1) year, and extendable by the parties yearly. This agreement expired prior to December 31, 2020.
Regulatory Determination
On May 17, 2019, IM Telecom was notified by USAC of an over-payment of Universal Service Fund reimbursements in the amount of $168,277. On July 25, 2019, the Company entered into a Letter of Acknowledgement with the FCC and requested a twenty-four (24)-month payment plan regarding the repayment of the over-payment amounts. While awaiting approval of this repayment plan, the Company continued to make monthly payments against the outstanding balance. On October 15, 2020, the Company received approval of the payment plan and signed a promissory note with USAC to repay the remainder of the unpaid balance in the amount of $67,105. The loan had a commencement date of November 13, 2020, a term of twelve (12) months, with an annual interest rate of 12.75%. The Company agreed to pay USAC $5,986 per month for twelve (12) months, and a $1,000 Administrative Fee due on October 15, 2020. The promissory note was paid in full in August of 2021.
Letters of Credit
The Company had no outstanding letters of credit as December 31, 2021.
NOTE 9 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates within two (2) reportable segments. The Company’s management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the profit or loss from operations. Because the Company is a recurring revenue service business with very few physical assets, management does not use total assets by segment to make decisions regarding operations, and therefore, the total assets disclosure by segment has not been included.
The reportable segments consist of Hosted Services and Mobile Services. Mobile Services reporting will now consist of our post-paid and pre-paid cellular business.
Hosted Services – This segment includes a suite of hosted CPaaS services within the Apeiron Systems’ cloud platform, including Cloud IVRs, Voicemail, Fax, Call Recording and other services provided with local, toll-free, and international phone numbers. Apeiron also delivers public and private IP network services from its national redundant network backbone including MPLS, Dedicated Internet and LTE Wireless WAN solutions. Additionally, Apeiron’s Cloud Services include Information Data Dips, SD-WAN, and IoT data and device management. These Hosted Services are marketed nationally through Apeiron’s website, its own sales staff, independent sales agents, and ISOs.
Mobile Services – This segment includes retail and wholesale cellular voice/text/data services and IoT mobile data services through our subsidiaries Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom. Mobile voice/text/data and IoT mobile data services are supported by a blend of reseller agreements with select national wireless carriers and national wireless wholesalers. A wireless communications service reseller typically does not own the wireless network infrastructure over which services are provided to its customers. Mobile voice/text/data and mobile data solutions are generally sold as traditional post-paid service plans that may include voice/text/data or wireless data only
| F-13 |
plans. Sometimes equipment is provided, which can include, but is not limited to, phones, tablets, modems, routers and accessories. Also included in our Mobile Services segment is the distribution of cellular voice service and mobile data service by IM Telecom under its Infiniti Mobile brand to low-income American households that qualify for the FCC’s Lifeline voice service program and the FCC’s temporary EBB mobile data program, with EBB to eventually be replaced by FCC’s ACP in 2022. Even though government programs like Lifeline have existed since 1985, these programs, along with newer programs like the temporary EBB program and future ACP program, are subject to change and may have a material impact on our Mobile Services business if changed, reduced, or eliminated.
The following table reflects the result of operations of the Company’s reportable segments:
| Hosted Services | Mobile Services | Total | ||||||||||
| For the year ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 5,740,728 | $ | 7,094,116 | $ | 12,834,844 | ||||||
| Gross Margin | $ | 2,013,459 | $ | 3,715,921 | $ | 5,729,380 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 805,469 | $ | 27,547 | $ | 833,016 | ||||||
| Additions to property and equipment | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Gross Margin % | 35.1 | % | 52.4 | % | 44.6 | % | ||||||
| For the year ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 5,296,151 | $ | 4,062,847 | $ | 9,358,999 | ||||||
| Gross Margin | $ | 1,927,060 | $ | 1,608,387 | $ | 3,535,447 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 820,794 | $ | 28,071 | $ | 848,865 | ||||||
| Additions to property and equipment | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Gross Margin % | 36.4 | % | 39.6 | % | 37.8 | % |
NOTE 10 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Compensation
The Company offers incentive stock option equity awards to directors and key employees. Options vest in tranches and expire in five (5) years, subject to conditions of their grant. During the year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, the Company recorded vested options expense of $341,515 and $80,603, respectively. The option expense not taken as of December 31, 2021, is $, with a weighted average term of years.
In 2021, share incentive stock options were granted to two (2) independent members of the Board of Directors and six (6) key employees. Each independent Board member was granted 25,000 shares per quarter of service for 2020 and 2021 for a total of 200,000 shares each. The key employees were granted 1,435,000 share options as part of their employment agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2021, 923,210 shares were exercised. 250,000 of these options were exercised by one (1) former Board member who received his options at the time of the KonaTel Nevada merger in 2017 and who was not an independent director, and 250,000 of these options were exercised by an officer who also received his options at the time of the KonaTel Nevada merger; the remaining 423,120 options were exercised by a former key employee. During the year, 251,880 share options were forfeited. The forfeited options were 76,880 granted to a former key employee and 175,000 granted to former independent Board members. The Aggregate Intrinsic Value is based on the market value of the Company’s common stock of $1.75 on December 31, 2021.
Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Potentially dilutive shares, which are based on the weighted-average shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock-based awards using the treasury stock method or the if-converted method, as applicable, are included when calculating diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common stockholders when their effect is dilutive.
| Weighted average | 231.59 | % | 280.02 | % | ||||
| Weighted average expected term (years) | ||||||||
| Risk free interest rate | 0.78 | % | % | |||||
| Expected dividend yield |
| F-14 |
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Life | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||||
| Options Outstanding: December 31, 2020 | 3,800,000 | $ | .21 | $ | 812,350 | ||||||||||||
| Granted | 1,635,000 | $ | .75 | 4.65 | |||||||||||||
| Exercised | (923,120 | ) | $ | .21 | |||||||||||||
| Forfeited | (251,880 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Options Outstanding: December 31, 2021 | 4,260,000 | $ | .37 | 2.25 | $ | 5,862,938 | |||||||||||
| Exercisable and Vested: December 31, 2021 | 1,981,926 | $ | .25 | $ | 2,970,907 | ||||||||||||
The following table represents stock option activity as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020:
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Life | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||||
| Options Outstanding: December 31, 2019 | 3,800,000 | $ | .20 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
| Granted | 400,000 | $ | .15 | 4.50 | |||||||||||||
| Exercised | |||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | (400,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Options Outstanding: December 31, 2020 | 3,800,000 | $ | .21 | 3.60 | $ | 812,350 | |||||||||||
| Exercisable and Vested: December 31, 2020 | 3,600,000 | $ | .22 | $ | 698,475 | ||||||||||||
In 2020, share options were granted to two (2) independent members of the Board of Directors. Each member was granted 25,000 shares per quarter of service for 2019 and 2020 for a total of 200,000 shares each. During the year 2020, 400,000 share options were forfeited. The forfeited options were 300,000 from a key employee and 100,000 from an independent Board member who had resigned and had not exercised his options prior to their expiration following resignation. The Aggregate Intrinsic Value is based on the market value of the Company’s common stock of $0.421 on December 31, 2020.
(This space intentionally left blank)
| F-15 |
NOTE 11 – INCOME TAX
For the years ending December 31, 2021, and 2020, there was no provision for income taxes and deferred tax assets have been entirely offset by valuation allowances.
The components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020 consisted of the following:
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Current: | |||||
| Federal | |||||
| State | |||||
| Total Current | |||||
| Deferred: | |||||
| Federal | |||||
| State | |||||
| Total Deferred | |||||
| Deferred tax assets: | |||||
| Net loss carryforward | $ | 318,892 | $ | 333,393 | |
| Depreciation | $ | 269,166 | $ | 204,362 | |
| Directors' fees | $ | 124,000 | |||
| Stock option expense | $ | 819,341 | $ | 1,008,761 | |
| Total deferred tax assets | $ | 1,407,399 | $ | 1,670,516 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||
| Amortization | $ | 153,499 | $ | 63,291 | |
The reconciliation of taxes at the federal statutory rate to our provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Tax at statutory federal rate | $ | 130,827 | $ | 50,110 | |
| Loss carryforward at statutory tax federal rate | $ | (130,827) | $ | (50,110) | |
| Provision for income tax |
(This space intentionally left blank)
| F-16 |
The tax effect of significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively, are as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Net operating loss carryforward | $ | 318,892 | $ | 333,393 | ||||
| Total gross deferred tax assets | 318,892 | 333,393 | ||||||
| Less: Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | (318,892 | ) | (333,393 | ) | ||||
| Total net deferred tax assets | ||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | $ | ||||||
| State - California | ||||||||
| Total net deferred taxes | $ | $ | ||||||
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
The total NOL as of December 31, 2021, is $1,518,534, represented below based on year of expiration;
| Expiration | NOL Amount | ||||
| 2037 | $ | 570,143 | |||
| 2038 | $ | 463,895 | |||
| 2039 | $ | 484,496 | |||
| $ | 1,518,534 | ||||
NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing, and with the exception of the following, no material subsequent events have occurred:
Changes of Officers and Directors
Effective January 1, 2022, Charles D. Griffin was hired as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Griffin will lead the Company’s sales and marketing divisions and all Company operations, subject to advice and consultation with the Chairman and CEO, D. Sean McEwen.
Mr. McEwen and the Company executed a third amendment to his Employment Agreement, effective April 12, 2022.
Effective February 4, 2022, Paul LaPier resigned his position as Vice President of Finance and Secretary of the Company. Mr. LaPier has agreed to continue to assist the Company as a consultant through December 31, 2022.
Effective January 24, 2022, the Company elected Todd Murcer as Executive Vice President of Finance and Secretary to replace Mr. LaPier.
Jason N. Welch was elected as the President of IM Telecom, effective February 14, 2022.
The Company entered into Employment Agreements with Messrs. Murcer and Welch, effective January 24, 2022, and February 14, 2022, respectively, or the effective dates of their respective Employment Agreements.
Effective February 28, 2022, Nicholas Metherd resigned as the COO of IM Telecom. Mr. Metherd has agreed to continue to assist the Company as a consultant through December 21, 2022
Increase in Common Stock reserved for Employee Stock Option Grants
Effective February 10, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company increased the shares reserved for issuance under its 2018 Incentive Stock Option Plan by an additional shares.
| F-17 |
Employee Stock Option Grants
Mr. Murcer was granted incentive stock options as of the effective date of his Employment Agreement at an exercise price of $ per share, vesting on the four (4) year anniversary dates of the grants, at the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant or January 24, 2022.
Jeffrey Pearl, an independent Board member, was granted quarterly incentive stock options on January 28, 2022, at an exercise price of $, fully vested, which was 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Robert Beaty, an independent Board member, was granted quarterly incentive stock options on February 12, 2022, at an exercise price of $, fully vested, which was 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Mr. Welch was granted incentive stock options as of the effective date of his Employment Agreement at an exercise price of $ per share, vesting on the four (4) year anniversary dates of the grants, at the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant or February 12, 2022.
SBA EIDL Loan
The Company received notice on March 16, 2022, of an additional six (6) month automatic repayment deferment on its $150,000 SBA EIDL loan, with monthly loan payments to commence on or about September 2022.
| F-18 |
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
During our two (2) most recent fiscal years, no independent accountant who was previously engaged as the principal accountant to audit our financial statements, or an independent accountant who was previously engaged to audit a significant subsidiary and on whom the principal accountant expressed reliance in its report, has resigned (or indicated it has declined to stand for re-election after the completion of the current audit) or was dismissed.
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act that are designed to ensure that material information relating to us is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of December 31, 2021, of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal controls over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records, which in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, management used the criteria established in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on the criteria established by COSO, management (with the participation of the CEO and the CFO) determined that the internal controls over financial reporting are effective as of December 31, 2021, and that there are no material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of such date.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to satisfy these requirements by providing the management’s report only.
| 26 |
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of the control system must reflect that there are resource constraints and that the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C: DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
None, not applicable.
(This space intentionally left blank)
| 27 |
PART III
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Identification of Directors and Executive Officers
Our executive officers and directors and their respective ages, positions and biographical information are set forth below.
| Name | Age | Positions Held | Since | |||
| D. Sean McEwen | 60 | Chairman, President and CEO | December 2017 | |||
| Charles D. Griffin | 57 | President and COO | January 2022 | |||
| Brian R. Riffle | 62 | Chief Financial Officer | December 2017 | |||
| Paul LaPier | 63 | Vice President of Finance | November 2018 | |||
| Secretary | April 2020 (1) | |||||
| B. Todd Murcer | 52 | EVP, Finance and Secretary | January 2022 | |||
| D. Sean McEwen | 60 | Director | December 2017 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 52 | Director | February 2018 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 58 | Director | October 2018 | |||
| Joshua Ploude | 45 | CEO of Apeiron Systems | December 2018 | |||
| Jason N. Welch | 51 | President of IM Telecom | February 2022 | |||
| Nicholas Metherd | 38 | Vice President of IM Telecom | October 2019 (2) |
| (1) | Mr. LaPier resigned effective February 4, 2022, and has agreed to continue as a consultant to the Company through December 31, 2022. |
| (2) | Mr. Metherd resigned effective February 28, 2022, and has agreed to continue as a consultant to the Company through December 31, 2022. |
Background and Business Experience
D. Sean McEwen
Mr. McEwen is 60 years of age and founded KonaTel Nevada in 2014, a wireless data and voice service reseller, and currently focuses his efforts exclusively on our current and planned business operations. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. McEwen consulted with multiple international Mobile virtual network operators (“MVNOs”) in the U.S., Peru, Croatia and China. From 2010 to 2011, he served as a founding board member of One Fund, a NYSE listed (NYSE: ONEF) exchange traded fund. One Fund pioneered the “ETF of ETFs” concept, and in 2011, came to the attention of Russell Investments, known for their stock indices (i.e., the Russell 2000). Russell Investments purchased One Fund in 2011. In 2008, Mr. McEwen became a member of the venture/angel investment group, Sierra Angels (www.sierraangels.com) serving on several high-tech due diligence committees and participating in early-stage funding transactions. In early 1983, he co-founded Online Data Corp. Through a series of acquisitions/mergers, this company was eventually renamed “TriTech Software Systems” (www.tritech.com) “TriTech”. From 1983 to 1990, it developed custom strategic software applications for numerous businesses, including E. F. Hutton Life Insurance, Travel Lodge Hotels, Foodmaker (Jack in the Box restaurants), AT&T, UCSD’s Scripps Institute of Oceanography and Visa’s Plus Systems national ATM network.
In 1991, TriTech transformed from a custom software development firm to an enterprise software development and systems integration company specializing in mission critical public safety (e.g., police, fire, and EMS) software solutions. TriTech’s flagship product, VisiCAD, was the world’s first 9-1-1 emergency dispatching system based on Microsoft technology with integrated GPS based tracking and predictive routing technology. In 1995, TriTech won the Microsoft Most Innovative Windows Application award competing against all Windows applications worldwide. In 1998, while Mr. McEwen was CEO, TriTech was named to the Inc. 500 as the 344th fastest growing privately held company in the United States. The following year, Bill Gates cited TriTech and VisiCAD in his book Business at the Speed of Thought as an example of a mission critical Windows based telecom system utilizing GPS.
Mr. McEwen served as Vice President of TriTech from 1983 to 1988, President from 1988 to 1996, Chairman/CEO from 1996 to 2000, and finally as a member of the Board of Directors, until controlling interest was sold to Westview Capital Partners in 2006.
| 28 |
Charles D. Griffin
Mr. Griffin is 57 years of age. Prior to joining us, Mr. Griffin served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lingo Communications, a provider of IP-based Cloud voice and data solutions, following its merger with Impact Telecom, Inc. (“Impact Telecom”) in 2018. In this role, he led the successful integration of Impact Telecom into Lingo Communications (“Lingo”) under a private equity purchase and facilitated the financing of the transaction in collaboration with a private equity investor.
Impact Telecom and Lingo continue to operate as global providers of voice and data communications services spanning Residential, SMB, Enterprise and Wholesale markets. Prior to the merger of Lingo and Impact Telecom, Mr. Griffin served as Chief Executive Officer of Impact Telecom, where he completed eleven (11) accretive M&A transactions and led the successful restructuring of multiple technology portfolio companies, including PacWest, TNCI and Unipoint Holdings, which resulted in record high net income. As one of the original founders of Impact Telecom, Mr. Griffin led it from a start-up to a company with annual revenues of over $290 million and more than 300 employees servicing 250,000 customers worldwide.
Mr. Griffin ultimately guided the Impact Telecom to a successful exit in 2020. Previously, Mr. Griffin served as Chief Executive Officer of Ipath Communications, where he was responsible for building a Class V Broadsoft VoIP network for SMB direct sales distribution with over 5,000 subscribers nationwide. In this role, he also led the successful merger with Impact Telecom. Prior to his time with Ipath, Mr. Griffin served in a number of business development, operations and sales roles where he was involved in product development, sales strategy and distribution and installations, all within the telecommunications industry.
Mr. Griffin graduated Summa Cum Laude in business communications from Metropolitan State University of Colorado. A lover of the outdoors, Mr. Griffin is a commercial pilot, alpinist, and lives in Colorado with his wife of over 32 years.
Brian R. Riffle
Mr. Riffle is 62 years of age and the founder of CFO Strategies LLC of Johnstown, Pennsylvania (“CFO Strategies”), an accounting firm and consulting firm, which he founded in May 2008. CFO Strategies has thirteen (13) employees; approximately 180 small business clients and approximately 650 tax clients. It provides consulting, CFO, accounting, bookkeeping, payroll and tax services, including: CFO for businesses; entire accounting department for businesses; temporary staffing for businesses; complete payroll processing; CFO consulting and small business start-up services; and prepares taxes for corporations, small businesses, non-profits and individuals. Mr. Riffle is the Managing Partner and has extensive experience in various industries, including: Chief Financial Officer, healthcare industry; telecommunications, security, manufacturing and non-profit industries experience; Chief Executive Officer in the financial services industry and healthcare; Assistant Controller in the retail industry; Consultant in non-profit, healthcare and event management arenas; governmental treasurer and board member for over thirty (30) years; and as a masters level college instructor at Mount Aloysius College since 1994. He is also a Certified Public Accountant (May 1987).
B. Todd Murcer
Mr. Murcer is 52 years of age. Prior to joining us, Mr. Murcer served as Executive Vice President, FP&A and Treasury of Lingo Communications, a provider of IP-based Cloud voice and data solutions, following its merger with Impact Telecom, Inc. (“Impact”) in 2018. In this key leadership position, he directed procedures and policies for the financial operations of the business and had responsibility for planning and implementing financial projections and reporting activities for the U.S. and its Canadian subsidiary, Vancouver Telephone Company, Limited. As owner of treasury operations, Mr. Murcer managed the use and sourcing of the company’s cash and banking activities with additional oversight to credit and collections risk management. Mr. Murcer has been in the telecommunication industry for more than 20 years, and got his start with Matrix Telecom, Inc. (“Matrix”), a Platinum Equity portfolio company that ultimately divested to Impact. At Matrix, he helped the company grow annual revenues from $10 million to $400 million, serving in a number of business development and financial roles and leading teams through numerous M&A transactions. Mr. Murcer holds a B.S. in Economics from the University of Oklahoma and an M.S.M. from Boston University’s Brussels Graduate Center.
Robert Beaty
Mr. Beaty is 52 years of age and currently the President of AGS Construction Inc., a premier reconstruction company in the Denver metropolitan area. Previously, he was the founder and CEO of Impact Telecom, a leader in the telecommunications market, which focused on delivering flexible and effective solutions to carriers, businesses and homes. Impact Telecom is comprised of a family of brands all dedicated to innovation, affordability and execution.
Mr. Beaty brings twenty-four (24) years of experience in telecommunications and managing wholesale and commercial customer bases. Prior to starting Impact Telecom in 2005, he served as the Senior Vice President of Sales for ICG Communications. He helped guide ICG through bankruptcy and was a valued member of the senior executive team tasked with growing and managing the customer base.
| 29 |
He earned a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Kansas and his M.B.A. in Business Administration from Webster University.
Jeffrey Pearl
Mr. Pearl is 58 years of age and brings more than thirty-one (31) years of Telecommunications/Cloud Service Provider experience to our Board of Directors. Jeffrey has experience in both the startup environment as well as working inside of some of the larger incumbent players, both privately held as well as publicly traded companies. This experience will assist us in building out our go to market strategy, focusing both on direct sales as well as the alternative channels of distribution. His extensive sales and marketing experience, knowledge of the marketplace and personal connections in the industry are valuable to us at this stage and throughout our evolution.
Mr. Pearl currently is involved in running three companies:
Mr. Pearl is currently CEO and Co-founder of OTG Consulting, which was founded in May 2016. OTG Consulting is a sales agency formed by a group of industry leaders in order to fill a gap in the marketplace. The group assists executives of SMB and Enterprise businesses as they make the move to cloud-based services. OTG Consulting works with most carriers and service providers delivering solutions for voice and data communications, internet, hosting, managed services and other cloud offerings
Mr. Pearl also consults under PearlCom, a consulting practice focusing on telecom companies and service providers which was founded in January 2016. PearlCom offers strategic advice, providing direction on sales management, technology implementation, product pricing and positioning, bringing his thirty (30) plus years of experience to the table, accelerating timelines and creating efficiencies.
Mr. Pearl also co-founded Secure View, where he is Chief Revenue Officer and Partner, which was founded in December 2016. Secure View is focused on delivering “best in class” unified IP-based security solutions. Its systems are designed to be more accessible and simpler to use allowing customers to feel that their security needs are 100% covered providing peace of mind allowing them to focus elsewhere on their business. Secure View offers the experience, knowledge and technical understanding coupled with relationships with the players/partners needed to move security systems to the cloud.
Prior to starting and running these three (3) companies, Jeffrey worked at Broadsoft (recently acquired by Cisco) July 2013 to May 2016, where he successfully ran North America Carrier Sales. In this role he cultivated strong relationships with C-Level executives within the major telcos and service providers utilizing BroadSoft in the US. Under his guidance, his organization also pursued new relationships with startups and providers not utilizing BroadSoft. After successfully fulfilling those duties, Jeffrey was next tasked with starting an entirely new division: Channel Acceleration, focusing on some of the largest customers in and outside the US. In this role, Jeffrey and his teams engaged with executives and sales organizations to productively assist in accelerating their efforts around “Go to Market” strategies, sales training and sales assistance in the area of Hosted VoIP and SIP Trunking services. Prior to Broadsoft Jeffrey successfully started, operated and sold two VoIP companies.
Joshua Ploude
Mr. Ploude is 45 years old. He is the President and CEO and Co-Founder of Apeiron Systems, and since 2013, he has been responsible for defining the product vision and operational strategy for Apeiron Systems. He has worked directly with software, hardware and carrier network vendors to oversee the development of Apeiron Systems’ product set; and has also had the responsibility to work with internal software development teams to ensure Apeiron Systems’ software provides the requisite function to support product and operational initiatives.
He has also been responsible for planning and building Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) and Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) facilities-based networks since 2001 and has managed 5+ “Greenfield network” (the installation of a network where there was not previously one in use) builds across all types of wireline and wireless network infrastructures.
Mr. Ploude holds a Bachelor of Science in Political Science from UCLA and a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management from Golden Gate University. He has had the following business experience since 1999: 1999-2005 - CTO of PCS1/Datavo - A facilities-based CLEC serving a California-wide footprint; 2006-2010 - President/CEO of Ethos Communications - A consultancy helping CLECs and ISPs with operational and technology development; 2010-2013 - CTO of TNCI - A facilities-based CLEC & ISP, serving a forty-eight (48)-state footprint; and 2013-Present - Co-Founder, CEO and President of Apeiron Systems.
Jason N. Welch
Mr. Welch is 51 years of age, President of IM Telecom. Prior to joining us, Mr. Welch served as Chief Operations Officer of 46 Labs LLC, a provider of SaaS, voice and data solutions servicing large enterprise and communications providers internationally. In this key leadership position, he directed procedures and policies for the operations of the business and had responsibility for service delivery, customer care and vendor management. Prior to joining 46 Labs, Mr. Welch served as Executive Vice President of Impact Telecom, a
| 30 |
Lingo Company. In this function, he provided oversight to carrier wholesale sales acquisition, product strategy, account management, agent channel management, vendor management, pricing, routing and business analytics. He successfully managed the growth of the carrier wholesale business unit to $40m+ in annual revenues, processing 18b+ voice minutes annually through hundreds of domestic and international carrier partnerships. Mr. Welch has been in the telecommunication industry for more than 25 years and has successfully served in management roles across companies such as Frontier Communications, Global Crossing, Telco Group Inc., KDDI Global, XO Communication and Impact Telecom.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between any of our officers and directors.
Involvement in Other Public Companies
Except as may be indicated above, none of our officers or directors is an “affiliate” of any other publicly held companies.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
During the past ten (10) years, none of our directors, executive officers or persons nominated to become directors or executive officers (or those in similar positions with us) has been the subject of any of the following:
(1) A petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two (2) years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two (2) years before the time of such filing
(2) Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(3) Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him or her from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:
| (i) | Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity; |
| (ii) | Engaging in any type of business practice; or |
| (iii) | Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws; |
(4) Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than sixty (60) days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
(5) Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any federal or state securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;
(6) Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;
(7) Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:
(i) Any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or
| 31 |
(ii) Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or
(iii) Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
(8) Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26)), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29)), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
The common stock of the Company is registered under the Exchange Act, and therefore, the officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our outstanding shares are subject to the provisions of Section 16(a) which requires them to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely upon review of the copies of such forms furnished to us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and based upon a review of the filings contained in the Edgar Archives, all such required reports were believed to be timely filed.
Delinquent Reports
Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reports filed by Messrs. Beaty and Pearl during the year ended December 31, 2021, both of whom are independent directors and each of whom receive quarterly incentive stock options grants for their service, were not timely filed for each of the quarterly incentive stock option grants they received. The late filings of these reports were not due to any act or lack of action by these persons, and was primarily due to the lack of coordination between the preparation of the incentive stock option grant documents, obtaining the requisite signatures, completing the beneficial reporting forms and getting all of them signed and timely filed. We have implemented a pre-timed system to ensure that all applicable documents necessary for the grants of incentive stock options and documentation of these grants, along with the timely filing of all of these required reports, are prepared, executed and filed.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics for our principal executive and financial officers. See Exhibit 14 in Part IV, Item 15. We anticipate that our Code of Ethics will be updated by our Board of Directors as the Board deems necessary.
Corporate Governance
Nominating Committee
We have not established a Nominating Committee because until our closing of the KonaTel Nevada Merger, we had only one (1) director and two (2) executive officers, and we believed that we were able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by a Nominating Committee and currently believe we can do without a Nominating Committee.
If we do establish a Nominating Committee, we will disclose our procedures in recommending nominees by our Board of Directors.
Audit Committee
We have not established an Audit Committee for the same reasons why we have not established a Nominating Committee, and a further review of this issue will no doubt be necessitated and undertaken by our management in the future.
Insider Trading Policy
During the year ended December 31, 2021, our Board of Directors adopted an Insider Trading Policy, which is Exhibit 99.1 hereto. See Item IV, Part 15.
The Insider Trading Policy was adopted by the Company to satisfy its obligations to prevent insider trading and to help its personnel avoid the consequences associated with violations of applicable federal and state securities laws, rules and regulations regarding insider trading of our securities when they have material non-public information related to the Company. It is also intended to prevent even the appearance of improper conduct on the part of anyone employed by or associated with us, not just so-called “insiders.” It contains four (4) “Black-Out Periods”, which are as follows: twenty (20) days prior to the release of financial results for the periods ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year and end after three (3) full trading days of our securities on the OTCQB (or any other recognized nation medium on which our securities publicly trade [“Other Medium”]) after financial results are announced for the preceding fiscal period. If the last day of the month falls on a weekend, the Black-Out Period will start at the close of business on the last trading day prior to the weekend. Additional Black-Out Periods may occur when other material events occur, such as a press release sent out to the public, wherein only a select few persons have knowledge of the event. The Black-Out Periods do not apply to the exercise of outstanding and vested ISOs issued by the Company or other stock issuances approved by the Board of Directors; however, they do apply to all of our securities that are the subject of a registration statement filed with the SEC. This summary is modified in its entirely by reference to Exhibit 99.1.
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
All Compensation
| 32 |
The following Employment Agreements of our officers and directors (with the exception of Mr. Metherd, for which there is no written Employment Agreement), which are discussed below under the caption “Executive Compensation” in Part III, Item 11 hereof, can be accessed by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof:
D. Sean McEwen-Chairman and CEO-8-K Current Report dated January 1, 2022, filed with the SEC January 14, 2022, along with the third amendment to Mr. McEwen’s Employment Agreement that is Exhibit 10.1 filed herewith.
Charles D. Griffin, President-8-K Current Report dated January 1, 2022, filed with the SEC January 14, 2022.
Todd C. Murcer-8-K Current Report dated February 4, 2022, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022.
Joshua Ploude, President of Apeiron Systems-8-K Current Report dated December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 31, 2018.
Jason N. Welch, President of IM Telecom-8-KA-1 Current Report dated February 4, 2022, filed with the SEC on April 8, 2022.
Summary Compensation Table
| Option | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred | and | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Name and | Compen- | Stock | Warrant | Compen- | |||||||||||||||||||
| Principal Position | Salary | sation | Bonus | Awards | Awards* | sation | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| D Sean McEwen, Chairman and CEO | 2021 | $ | 66,186 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 66,186 | ||||||||
| 2020 | $ | 198,491 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 198,491 | |||||||||
| Robert Beaty, Director | 2021 | $ | 31,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 89,334 | $ | — | $ | 120,334 | ||||||||
| 2020 | $ | 24,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,075 | $ | — | $ | 38,075 | |||||||||
| Jeffrey Pearl, Director | 2021 | $ | 31,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 78,876 | $ | — | $ | 109,876 | ||||||||
| 2020 | $ | 24,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12,602 | $ | — | $ | 36,602 | |||||||||
| Brian R. Riffle, Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 37,160 | $ | 37,160 | ||||||||
| 2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 18,954 | $ | 18,954 | |||||||||
| Paul LaPier, Secretary | 2021 | $ | 182,442 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,513 | $ | — | $ | 202,955 | ||||||||
| and Vice President of Finance | 2020 | $ | 140,102 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,513 | $ | — | $ | 160,615 | ||||||||
| Joshua Ploude, President, | 2021 | $ | 219,679 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 219,679 | ||||||||
| Apeiron Systems | 2020 | $ | 200,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||
| Nick Metherd, Vice President, IM Telecom | 2021 | $ | 180,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,513 | $ | — | $ | 200,513 | ||||||||
| 2020 | $ | 119,388 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,513 | $ | — | $ | 139,901 | |||||||||
*See the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards” below.
Employment Agreement of D. Sean McEwen
At the Effective Time of the KonaTel Merger, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. McEwen for a term of two (2) years, under which he served as the Chairman, President and CEO of our Company, with customary duties applicable to these positions, which are described in his McEwen Employment Agreement that can be viewed under the heading “KonaTel Merger Current Reports” in Part IV, Item 15. After the initial term, the McEwen Employment Agreement provided that it will continue on a year-to-year basis as specified under Section 3.0 thereof. During the initial term (2018-2019), Mr. McEwen received the following compensation under his Employment Agreement: $1,000 per month base salary; and inclusion in our healthcare plan for employees, including medical, dental and vision, which coverage also includes his spouse. Effective January 1, 2020, McEwen’s Employment Agreement was amended to adjust his monthly base salary to $16,667, including a monthly bonus program tied to a percentage of EBITDA. Effective January 1, 2022, McEwen’s Employment Agreement was amended a second time to adjust his monthly base salary to $22,916.66, including a twenty-four (24) month severance compensation package equal to his then current base salary, together with any accrued and untaken vacation, in the event any employment departure is not “for cause” as defined in the McEwen Employment Agreement. Additionally, at the time of the second amendment to his Employment Agreement, Mr. McEwen resigned as President of the Company to allow for Charles D. Griffin to assume the role of President and COO of the Company. Mr. McEwen remains as Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company. Mr. McEwen has never claimed the “percentage of EBITDA” bonus program provision of his Employment Agreement; accordingly, effective April 12, 2022, Mr. McEwen suggested, and the Board of Directors agreed, to a third amendment of his Employment Agreement thereby eliminating the percentage of EBITDA bonus provision. Mr. McEwen volunteered this third amendment to his Employment Agreement without receipt of any current or future consideration, and all other terms and conditions of the McEwen Employment Agreement along with its three amendments remain the same. The third amendment to Mr. McEwen’s Employment Agreement is filed herewith as Exhibit 10.1, in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.
| 33 |
Charles D. Griffin Employment Agreement
The Griffin Employment Agreement covers customary duties performed by persons serving in the capacities of President and COO, and Mr. Griffin, with the guidance of Mr. McEwen, our Chairman and CEO, will assist in the management and leadership of the Company and is accountable to our CEO; he will also act as a liaison between the Company, our subsidiaries and our CEO. A complete description of his duties is contained in Exhibit A of the Griffin Employment Agreement, which provides, among other customary terms and provisions: (i) a monthly base salary of $20,833.33, along with inclusion in our healthcare plan for employees and spouse, including medical, dental and vision coverage, effective January 1, 2022, and termination can occur on thirty (30) days’ notice by either party; (ii) customary trade secret, non-competition and dispute resolution provisions, among other provisions; and (iii) he shall be paid a twelve (12) months’ severance compensation package equal to his then current base salary, together with any accrued and untaken vacation, in the event any employment departure is not “for cause” as defined in the Griffin Employment Agreement.
The Employment Agreement has customary termination, trade secret and dispute resolution clauses, among others.
B. Todd Murcer Employment Agreement
On January 24, 2022, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Murcer (the “Murcer Employment Agreement”), under which Mr. Murcer will serve as our Executive Vice President of Finance and Secretary of the Company, with customary duties applicable to these positions, and which are described in Exhibit A thereof. Under the Murcer Employment Agreement, Mr. Murcer will receive the following compensation: $18,750 per month base salary; and inclusion in our healthcare plan for employees, including medical, dental and vision, which coverage also includes his immediate family. The monthly base salary may be increased or decreased from time to time in the sole discretion of the Company, but in no event shall the monthly base salary be less than the amount stated in this section. Mr. Murcer entitled to four (4) weeks of paid vacation during each year of his employment in accordance to the Company’s vacation accrual policy as defined by our Company handbook; and he may also receive an annual bonus under the Company’s bonus program established by us and as approved by our Board of Directors each calendar year.
The Murcer Employment Agreement also contained customary termination, trade secret and dispute resolution clauses, among others.
Joshua Ploude Employment Agreement
Effective December 31, 2018, Apeiron and Mr. Ploude executed and delivered a 36-month Employment Agreement under which Mr. Ploude will be the Chief Executive Officer of Apeiron, with the attendant duties and responsibilities outlined in his Employment Agreement, at a monthly salary of $16,667 (the “Ploude Employment Agreement”). On September 1, 2021, Mr. Ploude’s monthly salary was increased to $20,883.33. The Ploude Employment Agreement has customary provisions regarding trade secrets; a one (1) year covenant not to compete; confidentiality; Apeiron’s continued ownership of intellectual property; a duty to cooperate; free, fully-paid licensing to Apeiron of inventions created by Mr. Ploude that he provides or incorporates into any Employer product or system during his employment with Apeiron; and an assignment of Mr. Ploude’s interest in all relevant intellectual property utilized by Apeiron, among other terms and conditions.
Jason N. Welch Employment Agreement
On February 2, 2022 (effective February 14, 2022), we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Welch (the “Welch Employment Agreement”), under which Mr. Welch will serve as the President of IM Telecom, with customary duties applicable to this position, and which are described in Exhibit A thereof. Under the Welch Employment Agreement, Mr. Welch will receive the following compensation: $20,833.33 per month base salary; and inclusion in our healthcare plan for employees, including medical, dental and vision, which coverage also includes his immediate family. The monthly base salary may be increased or decreased from time to time in the sole discretion of the Company, but in no event shall the monthly base salary be less than the amount stated in this section. Mr. Welch is entitled to four (4) weeks of paid vacation during each year of his employment in accordance to the Company’s vacation accrual policy as defined by our Company handbook; and he may also receive an annual bonus under the Company’s bonus program established by us and as approved by our Board of Directors each calendar year.
The Welch Employment Agreement also contained customary termination, trade secret and dispute resolution clauses, among others.
| 34 |
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Outstanding Equity Awards
| Name | Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable |
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) not exercisable |
Equity incentive plan awards; number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options (#) |
Option exercise price ($) |
Option expiration date |
Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#) |
Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#) |
Equity incentive plan awards; number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (3) |
Equity incentive plan awards; market or payout value of unearned shares, united or other rights that have not vested | |
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) |
| D. Sean McEwen | 1,500,000 | 0 | $0.2200 | (1) | 0 | 0 | |||
| John Shadek | 50,000 | 0 | $0.2000 | (2) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 100,000 | 0 | $0.3300 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1771 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 50,000 | 0 | $0.1672 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1650 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.2618 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1309 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.0627 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.4400 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.6600 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $0.9350 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 25,000 | 0 | $1.9250 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Robert Beaty | 0 | 25,000 | $1.1440 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 100,000 | 0 | $0.4950 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1650 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1232 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1672 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.1001 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.4895 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.5970 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $0.8130 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 25,000 | 0 | $1.5950 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | 0 | 25,000 | $1.3420 | (3) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Nick Metherd | 300,000 | 0 | $0.1500 | (4) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Paul LaPier | 300,000 | 0 | $0.1500 | (4) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jonathan So | 0 | 150,000 | $0.3200 | (5) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Cynthia Collins | 0 | 75,000 | $0.7300 | (6) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Edward Archuleta | 0 | 30,000 | $0.7300 | (7) | 0 | 0 | |||
| James Connolly | 0 | 30,000 | $0.7300 | (7) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Charles D. Griffin | 0 | 1,100,000 | $0.7800 | (8) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Amy Pearson | 0 | 50,000 | $0.7500 | (9) | 0 | 0 | |||
| B. Todd Murcer | 0 | 350,000 | $1.1650 | (10) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Jason N. Welch | 0 | 350,000 | $1.0400 | (11) | 0 | 0 | |||
| (1) | These options vested on the following dates and are exercisable in the following tranches, as vested, and expire December 18, 2022: 187,500 shares exercisable March 18, 2018; June 18, 2018; September 18, 2018; December 18, 2018; March 18, 2019; June 18, 2019; September 18, 2019; and December 18, 2019. |
| 35 |
| (2) | These options all vested on December 18, 2017 and expire December 18, 2022. |
| (3) | As part of their designation as directors, Messrs. Addington, Beaty and Pearl (commencing with the quarter beginning on January 28, 2019) were granted quarterly stock option grants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock, with the shares being valued at 110% of the fair market value or the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant for the first year, and thereafter at 110% of the fair market value or the closing price of our common stock on the quarterly date of vesting for the remaining quarters of service as a director. These options expire at the earlier of five (5) years from the date of grant or one (1) year from termination or resignation as a director. These directors were also paid $2,000 per month for their service on the Board of Directors until June of 2021 when the amount was increased to $3,000 per month. See the “Summary Compensation Table” above. Mr. Addington resigned as a director of the Company on January 1, 2020, and he forfeited 175,000 options that were not exercised within the one (1) year period of his resignation on January 1, 2021. |
| (4) | These options were granted on October 24, 2019, and vest 100,000 shares on December 31, 2019; 100,000 shares on December 31, 2020; and 100,000 shares on December 31, 2021; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years or three (3) months from the termination of employment. |
| (5) | These options were granted on April 1, 2021, and vest 50,000 shares on April 1, 2022; 50,000 shares on April 1, 2023; and 50,000 shares on April 1, 2024; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years or three (3) months from the termination of employment. |
| (6) | These options were granted on May 17, 2021, and vest 25,000 shares on May 17, 2022; 25,000 shares on May 17, 2023; and 25,000 shares on May 17, 2024; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years or three (3) months from the termination of employment. |
| (7) | These options were granted on May 17, 2021, and vest 10,000 shares on May 17, 2022; 10,000 shares on May 17, 2023; and 10,000 shares on May 17, 2024; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years or three (3) months from the termination of employment. |
| (8) | These options were granted on July 6, 2021, and vest 275,000 shares on January 7, 2023; 275,000 shares on January 7, 2024; 275,000 shares on January 7, 2025; and 275,000 shares on January 7, 2026; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years or three (3) months from the termination of employment. |
| (9) | These options were granted on September 27, 2021, and vest 16,667 shares on September 27, 2022; 16,667 shares on September 27, 2023, and 16,666 shares on September 27, 2024; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years or three (3) months from the termination of employment. |
| (10) | These options were granted on January 24, 2022, and vest 87,500 shares on January 24, 2023, 87,500 shares on January 24, 2024, 87,500 shares on January 24, 2025 and 87,500 shares January 24, 2026; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years. |
| (11) | These options were granted on February 14, 2022, and vest 87,500 shares February 14, 2023, 87,500 shares on February 14, 2024, 87,500 shares on February 14, 2025 and 87,500 shares on February 14, 2026; and they expire on the earlier of five (5) years. |
Compensation of Directors
Mr. McEwen receives no compensation to serve as a Director and Chairman of the Board. Currently, and except for compensation of Mr. McEwen under his Employment Agreement and the $3,000 monthly compensation set out above for certain directors, our directors do not receive any other compensation other than the incentive stock options outlined above in this Item under the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards.”
Transactions with Related Persons
For information regarding transactions with related persons, see the heading “Transactions with Related Persons,” in Part III, Item 13 below.
Promoters and Certain Control Persons
See the heading “Transactions with Related Persons,” under Item 13 below.
| 36 |
Parents of the Smaller Reporting Company
We have no parents.
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth the ownership by any person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of any of our outstanding voting securities as of the filing of this Annual Report with the SEC. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Other than as indicated below in footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table below have sole voting power and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners
|
Name and Address* of Beneficial Owner |
Title of Class |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1), (2) & (3) |
Percent of Class (1), (2) & (3) | |||
| D. Sean McEwen | Common | 17,000,000 | 38.21% | |||
| Joshua Ploude | Common | 6,300,000 | 14.16% | |||
| Shawnee Communications, Inc. | Common | 2,500,000 | 5.62% |
Security Ownership of Officers and Directors
|
Name and Address* of Officer or Director |
Title of Class |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1), (2) & (3) |
Percent of Class (1), (2) & (3) | |||
| D. Sean McEwen | Common | 17,000,000 | 38.21% | |||
| Brian R. Riffle | Common | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Paul LaPier | Common | 300,000 | 0.67% | |||
| B. Todd Murcer | Common | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Robert Beaty | Common | 450,000 | 1.01% | |||
| Jeffrey Pearl | Common | 350,000 | 0.79% | |||
| Joshua Ploude | Common | 6,300,000 | 14.16% | |||
| Jason N. Welch | Common | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Nicholas Metherd | Common | 300,000 | 0.67% | |||
| All Officers and Directors as a Group | Common | 24,700,000 | 55.52% |
*The Company’s principal executive office address on the cover page.
(1) The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares, which the individual has the right to acquire within sixty (60) days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table.
(2) Based on 41,615,406 issued and outstanding shares of common stock, together with 2,875,000 vested options, comprised of 1,500,000 for Sean McEwen, 425,000 for Robert Beaty, 350,000 Jeffrey Pearl, 300,000 for Nick Metherd and 300,000 for Paul LaPier, for a total of 44,490,406 issued (or issuable with respect to such options within sixty [60] days) and outstanding shares of common stock, as of the date of this Annual Report. SEC Rule 13d-3 generally provides that management’s beneficial ownership of securities includes any such security that can be acquired within sixty (60) days. Accordingly, any securities not outstanding, which are subject to such options, warrants or conversion privileges and exercisable within sixty (60) days, are treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding securities owned by that person, and are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class owned by any such person.
(3) Joshua Ploude acquired 6,300,000 shares of our common stock under the Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement outlined in our 8-K Current Report dated December 31, 2018 and filed with the SEC on December 31, 2018. See the heading “Apeiron Systems Merger Current Reports” in Part IV, Item 15 hereof. The beneficial ownership of Mr. McEwen in the “Beneficial Owners” table includes 15,500,000 shares directly owned; and 1,500,000 shares underlying personally owned vested options, all of which vested options can be exercised within sixty (60) days of the filing of this Annual Report.
| 37 |
Changes in Control
There are no additional present arrangements or pledges of our securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Transactions with Related Persons
Transactions with Shareholders
During 2019, Apeiron System’s CEO, Joshua Ploude, advanced $200,000 to the Company. This amount was fully repaid as of October, 2020.
During 2017, three of the Company’s shareholders, D. Sean McEwen, Matthew Atkinson, and Mark Savage advanced $191,500, $15,063 and $7,564, respectively, to the Company. The amounts advanced were used for working capital purposes and did not bear any interest and had no maturity date. All advances were fully repaid as of December 31, 2019.
Transactions with CFO Strategies LLC
Brian R. Riffle, the CFO of the Company, is the Managing Partner of CFO Strategies, LLC. Payments of $37,160 were made to CFO Strategies LLC as compensation for the CFO services of Mr. Riffle.
Promoters and Certain Control Persons
See the heading “Transactions with Related Persons” of this Item above, and Part III, Item 12 hereof for identification of control persons.
Director Independence
For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15), which states that “Independent director” means “a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.” None of the following named directors come within any of the exceptions to this definition regarding: being or having been an executive officer; having an employee-employer relationship with us; having received compensation from us in an amount in excess of $100,000; and having certain relationships with us, in the case of membership of a director on an audit committee, including applicable family relationships. Accordingly, Messrs. Robert Beaty and Jeffrey Pearl, two (2) of our current directors, are independent directors.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
We have not adopted an Audit Committee; therefore, there is no Audit Committee policy in this regard. However, we do require approval in advance of the performance of professional services to be provided to us by our principal accountant. Additionally, all
services rendered by our principal accountant are performed pursuant to a written engagement letter between us and the principal accountant.
ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by our principal accountants, Haynie & Company, CPAs, during the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively:
| Fee Category | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 106,156 | $ | 92,525 | ||||
| Audit-related Fees | — | — | ||||||
| Tax Fees | — | — | ||||||
| All Other Fees | — | — | ||||||
| Total Fees | $ | 106,156 | $ | 92,525 | ||||
Audit Fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements for our 10-K Annual Reports and review of the financial statements included in our 10-Q Quarterly Reports or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
| 38 |
Audit-related Fees - Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit fees.”
Tax Fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees - Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-related Fees,” and “Tax Fees” above.
(This space intentionally left blank)
| 39 |
PART IV
ITEM 15: EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1)(2)
Financial Statements. See the audited financial statements of the Company contained in Part II, Item 8 above, of this Annual Report, which are incorporated herein by this reference.
(a)(3)
Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:
(a) Exhibits.
| Exhibit | Description of Exhibit | Filing | ||
| Number | ||||
| 3(i) | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | Filed with the Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
| 3(ii) | Amended and Restated Bylaws | Filed with the Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
| 10.1 | Third Amended Employment Agreement with D. Sean McEwen | Filed herewith. | ||
| 14 | Code of Ethics | Filed with the Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith. | ||
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith. | ||
| 99.1 | Insider Trading Policy | Filed herewith. | ||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
Exhibits incorporated by reference:
Apeiron Systems Merger Current Reports
8-K Current Report dated December 31, 2018, and filed with the SEC on December 31, 2018.
8-K/A-2 Current Report dated December 31, 2018, and filed with the SEC on June 21, 2021
| 40 |
Telecon Wireless Sale Current Report
8-K Current Report dated August 9, 2018, and filed with the SEC on August 15, 2018.
IM Telecom Current Reports
8-KA-2 Current Report of the same February 7, 2018, and filed with the SEC on February 6, 2019.
IM Telecom PSMI (First Amendment)
IM Telecom PSMI (Second Amendment)
Morrow Independent Contractor Agreement and Incentive Stock Option Agreement
Morrow Incentive Stock Option Agreement
Morrow Lock-Up/Leak-Out Agreement
Closing Memorandum (without Exhibits)
8-KA-1 Current Report of the February 7, 2018, and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2019.
8-K Current Report dated February 19, 2019 and filed with the SEC on February 19, 2019.
8-K Current Report dated September 4, 2019, filed with the SEC on September 6, 2019.
Morrow Settlement Agreement and Release
8-K Current Report dated January 1, 2022, and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2022.
First Amended Employment Agreement with D. Sean McEwen
2nd Amended Employment Agreement with D. Sean McEwen
Charles D. Griffin Employment Agreement
8-K/A-1 Current Report dated February 4, 2022, and filed with the SEC on April 8, 2022.
Jason N. Welch Employment Agreement
8-K Current Report dated February 4, 2022, and filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
| 41 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
KonaTel, Inc.
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ D. Sean McEwen | |
| D. Sean McEwen | ||||
| Chairman and CEO |
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ Brian R. Riffle | |
| Brian R. Riffle | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ D. Sean McEwen | |
| D. Sean McEwen | ||||
| Chairman, CEO and a Director |
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ Brian R. Riffle | |
| Brian R. Riffle | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ Robert Beaty | |
| Robert Beaty | ||||
| Director |
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ Jeffrey Pearl | |
| Jeffrey Pearl | ||||
| Director |
42
Exhibit 10.1
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
MCEWEN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE MCEWEN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made, effective as of April 12, 2022, by and between David Sean McEwen, an individual (“Employee”), and KonaTel, Inc, a Delaware corporation (a successor to Dala Petroleum Corp.) (“Employer”), with reference to the following facts and objectives:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on or about December 1, 2017, Employee and Employer entered into the McEwen Employment Agreement (the “McEwen Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2019, the Board of Directors voted to amend the McEwen Employment Agreement to provide Employee with an annual salary of $200,000, commencing January 1, 2020, and with all other terms and conditions thereof to remain the same (the “McEwen First Amended Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2022, Employer and Employee amended the McEwen Employment Agreement to increase Employee’s annual compensation to $275,000 (the “Base Salary”) and to provide for a two (2) year severance compensation package equal to Employee’s Base Salary or an aggregate of $550,000, together with any accrued and untaken vacation, in the event of Employee’s departure from Employer, if any termination of employment is not “for cause” as defined in the McEwen Employment Agreement (respectively, the “McEwen Second Amended Employment Agreement” and the “Severance Compensation”); and
WHEREAS, Employee also resigned as the President of Employer, effective on January 1, 2022, and continues to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) of Employer as provided in the McEwen Employment Agreement; and
WHEREAS, effective April 12, 2022, Employer and Employee desire to amend the McEwen Employment Agreement to retroactively delete the “Combined EBITDA” provisions of subparagraph (i) of Section 2.0 of the McEwen Employment Agreement (the “McEwen Third Amended Employment Agreement”).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree to the following amendment to the McEwen Employment Agreement:
Deletion of Combined EBITDA Provisions of the McEwen Employment Agreement. All provisions of the McEwen Employment Agreement that pertain to the payment to Employee of any amount based upon the Combined EBITDA provisions thereof contained in subparagraph (i) of Section 2.0 are hereby deleted from the McEwen Employment Agreement.
All remaining terms and conditions of the McEwen Employment Agreement and the McEwen First Amended Employment Agreement and the McEwen Second Amended Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have duly executed this Agreement effective as of the 12th day of April, 2022.
| EMPLOYEE: | EMPLOYER: | ||
| KONATEL, INC., a Delaware corporation | |||
| /s/ D. Sean McEwen | By: | /s/ Chuck Griffin | |
| D. Sean McEwen | Chuck Griffin, President/COO | ||
2
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, D. Sean McEwen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of KonaTel, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ D. Sean McEwen | |
| D. Sean McEwen | ||||
| Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Brian R. Riffle, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of KonaTel, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ Brian R. Riffle | |
| Brian R. Riffle | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of KonaTel, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), we, D. Sean McEwen, Chief Executive Officer, and Brian R. Riffle, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ D. Sean McEwen | |
| D. Sean McEwen | ||||
| Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: | April 14, 2022 | By: | /s/ Brian R. Riffle | |
| Brian R. Riffle | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 99.1
INSIDER TRADING POLICY
KonaTel, Inc. (“KTEL”)
1. General Purpose
Federal securities laws prohibit the purchase
or sale of securities by persons who are aware of material nonpublic information about a company, as well as the disclosure of material,
nonpublic information about a company to others who then trade in the company’s securities. These transactions are commonly known
as “insider trading.”
Insider trading violations are heavily pursued
by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Attorney Offices and are punished. While the regulatory authorities concentrate
their efforts on individuals who trade, or who provide inside information to others who trade, the Federal securities laws also impose
potential liability on companies and other “controlling persons” if they fail to take reasonable steps to prevent insider
trading by company personnel.
The Board of Directors of KonTel, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, has adopted this Insider Trading Policy (the “Policy”) both to satisfy its obligation to prevent insider trading
and to help its personnel avoid the consequences associated with violations of the insider trading laws. For purposes of this policy,
the “Company” includes KonaTel, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“KonaTel”).
This Policy is also intended to prevent even the appearance of improper conduct on the part of anyone employed by or associated with us, not just so-called “insiders.” Everyone within KonaTel has worked very hard to establish KonaTel as a company known for integrity and ethical conduct, and therefore cannot afford to have that reputation damaged.
A copy of this Policy is to be delivered to all current and new employees and consultants upon the commencement of their relationships with KonaTel and its subsidiaries.
2. Persons Covered
This Policy refers to an “insider” and we wish to define it herein. Insiders of KonaTel, Inc. are defined as (a) members of our Board of Directors, corporate officers and employees; (b) consultants to KonaTel and subsidiaries or other persons associated with KonaTel and/or its subsidiaries, including distributors, sales agents or other partners that may, in the course of their work with KonaTel, receive access to confidential, material non-public information; and (c) household and immediate family members of those listed in (a) and (b) above.
| 1 |
3. Definitions
A) Material non-public information: Material non-public information is defined to be information that is not known to persons outside the immediate company that could be relied upon or considered significant to an investor making a decision to buy or sell KonaTel securities. It is currently very difficult to define each and every category under this heading. However, any information that should be considered sensitive and non-public material includes but is not limited to the following:
| i) | Financial results; |
| ii) | Future Earnings or Losses; |
| iii) | News of a pending or proposed sale, merger or acquisition; |
| iv) | Acquisitions, Mergers or Divestitures; |
| v) | Impending bankruptcy or financial liquidity problems; |
| vi) | Major changes in senior management; |
| vii) | Stock dividends or splits; |
| viii) | New equity or debt offerings; |
| ix) | Large contracts in a pending status or in discussion. |
Remember, anyone who is reviewing your securities transactions will be doing so after the fact, with the benefit of hindsight. As such, before engaging in any transaction, you should carefully consider how the others might view the transaction.
B) Black-Out Periods: A “Black-Out Period” is a time before and after a significant event wherein an insider may not buy or sell KonaTel securities without violating this Policy.
There are four Black-Out Periods for insiders of KonaTel. These include twenty (20) days prior to the release of financial results for the periods ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year and end after three (3) full trading days of KonaTel (KTEL) securities on the OTCQB (or any other recognized nation medium of which KonaTel (KTEL) securities publicly trade [“Other Medium”]) after the results are announced for the preceding fiscal period. If the last day of the month falls on a weekend, the Black-Out Period will start at the close of business on the last trading day prior to the weekend.
Additional Black-Out Periods may occur when other
material events occur, such as a press release sent out to the public, wherein only a select few persons have knowledge of the event.
If you are one of these individuals, or if it would appear to an outsider that you were likely to have had access to such information
related to the event, then you will not be allowed to purchase or sell KonaTel securities so long as the event remains non-public information
and for three (3) full trading days of KonaTel, Inc. securities on the OTCBB or Other Medium after the event is made public.
Also, KonaTel may occasionally issue interim earnings guidance or other potentially material information by filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Form 8-K or by other means designed to achieve widespread dissemination of the information. You should anticipate that trades are unlikely to be pre-cleared while KonaTel is in the process of
| 2 |
assembling the information to be released and until the information has
been released and fully absorbed by the public market. The existence of an additional Black-Out Period will not be announced. If you request
pre-clearance of a transaction in KonaTel’s securities during an additional Black-Out Period, you will be informed of the existence
of a Black-Out Period, but you may not be advised of the reason for the Black-Out Period.
If you are made aware of the existence of an additional Black-Out Period, you should not disclose the existence of the Black-Out Period to any other person. Whether or not you are designated as being subject to an additional Black-Out Period, you still have the obligation not to purchase or sell KonaTel securities while you are aware of the material non-public information.
C) Securities: Securities of KonaTel are defined as common stock, preferred stock, options to purchase stock, warrants, convertible debt and/or derivative securities.
These Black-Out Periods do not apply to the exercise of Stock Option Agreements for Rule 144 common stock of KonaTel that are issued by KonaTel, or other stock issuances approved by the Board of Directors; however, they do apply to all KonaTel securities that are the subject of a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4. Policy
| v | No insider may buy or sell KonaTel securities at any time when they have material non-public information relating to KonaTel. |
| v | No insider may buy or sell securities of another company at any time when they have material non-public information about that company, including, without limitation, any company that we conduct ordinary business with, such as customers, vendors, or suppliers, when that information is obtained during the course of his/her employment with KonaTel or its subsidiaries. |
| v | No insider may disclose material non-public information to third parties, to any other person, including family members, or make recommendations or express opinions on the basis of material non-public information with regard to trading securities. |
| v | No insider who receives or has access to our material non-public information may comment on the stock price movement or rumors of other corporate developments that are of possible significance to the investing public, unless it is part of his/her job description (e.g., Investor Relations) or you have been specifically pre-authorized by the KonaTel CEO or CFO in each instance. |
| v | If you comment on stock price movement or rumors and/or disclose material non-public information, you should immediately contact KonaTel’s Chief Compliance Officer. |
| v | No insider may buy or sell our securities during any of the four Black-Out Periods that occur each fiscal year or any other Black-Out Period. |
| v | This Policy continues in effect until the end of the first Black-Out Period after termination of employment or other relationship with KonaTel or its subsidiaries. |
| 3 |
5. Special Rules
If a concern or question relating to your status within KonaTel (insider or not, etc.) should arise, please contact the Chief Compliance Officer.
| A) | Special Rules applicable to the Board of Directors, those officers of KonaTel who are subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (persons subject to reports on Forms 3, 4, and 5), and other employees who may be designated from time to time by KonaTel’s Compliance Officer. |
| a. | In addition to the restrictions related to the trading of KonaTel securities as defined in Section 4 above, insiders shall not purchase or sell any KonaTel securities, except: |
| i. | After first consulting with and pre-clearing such transaction with the KonaTel’s Compliance Officer; |
| ii. | Only during the period commencing at the opening of the fourth (4th) full day after earnings are released with respect to the preceding fiscal quarter and ending twenty (20) days prior to the end of the current fiscal quarter. |
| b. | In addition to the restrictions related to the trading of KonaTel securities as defined in Section 4 above, insiders shall: |
| i. | Not engage in short sales of KonaTel securities; |
| ii. | Not buy or sell put options, call options or other derivatives of the KonaTel’s securities. |
| c. | In addition to the restrictions related to the trading of KonaTel securities as defined in Section 4 above, insiders shall: |
| i. | Comply with SEC Rule 10b-5 with his/her broker when placing sales of KonaTel securities near a Black-Out Period date. |
| B) | Special Rules applicable to officers of KonaTel that are not subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and assistants and secretaries of insiders, and certain other employees that may be designated from time to time by KonaTel’s Compliance Officer. |
| a. | In addition to the restrictions related to the trading of KonaTel securities as defined in Section 4 above, insiders shall not: |
| 4 |
| i. | Purchase or sell any KonaTel securities except during the period commencing at the opening of the fourth (4th) full day after earnings are released with respect to the preceding fiscal quarter and ending twenty (20) days prior to the end of the current fiscal quarter; |
| ii. | Not engage in short sales of KonaTel securities. |
6. Exceptions to the Policy
The restriction related to the trading of KonaTel securities as defined in Section 4 above does not apply to the following item:
| A) | The exercise of stock options for cash under any equity, pension or stock option plan or any other plan later defined (but not the sale of such shares), since the market price does not affect the exercise price stated in the agreement. |
7. Potential Criminal and/or Civil Liability and/or Disciplinary Action
The items set forth in this Policy are simply to be viewed as guidelines, not as comprehensive coverage of all potential instances. Appropriate judgment should be exercised by each individual in connection with the purchase or sale of securities.
Insiders found liable for insider trading may be subject to criminal penalties of up to $1,000,000 and up to ten (10) years in jail for trading of securities based on material non-public information. In addition, insiders may also be liable for conducting transactions improperly by any person to whom they have disclosed the material non-public information. The Securities and Exchange Commission has imposed large penalties even when the disclosing person did not profit, directly or indirectly, from the trade(s). There are also civil penalties of up to three (3) times the profit gained, or loss avoided, that may be imposed.
KonaTel and controlling persons of KonaTel may also be found liable for insider trading by any insider, and accordingly all purchases and sale of KonaTel by insiders must be made within the terms and conditions of this Policy and must be first submitted to the Chief Compliance Officer.
Furthermore, any employees who are found in violation of this Policy will be subject to disciplinary action as outlined in the Employee Handbook, including ineligibility of future participation in equity incentive plans or termination of employment.
For all purposes of this Policy, Paul LaPier shall be designated as the “Chief Compliance Officer.” Mr. LaPier’s telephone number is 214-323-8430; and his e-mail address is paul@konatel.com.
All communications of every kind hereunder shall be in writing or shall be of no effect.
| 5 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT CONCERNING INSIDER TRADING POLICY
I, , acknowledge that I have read and understand the Insider Trading Policy of KonaTel and that I agree to abide by the provisions stated therein. I further certify that I understand that failure to adhere to these rules will result in serious consequences and may result in termination of my employment with KonaTel or its subsidiaries.
Dated this ____ day of 202_.
| Signature: | |
| Name: |
6