WPX Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2019
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
3
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
505
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
81
|
|
174
|
Inventories
|
45
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
Assets classified as held for sale
|
—
|
|
79
|
Other
|
34
|
|
30
|
Total current assets
|
774
|
|
739
|
Investments
|
55
|
|
167
|
Properties and equipment (successful efforts method of accounting)
|
10,713
|
|
9,949
|
Less—accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(3,158)
|
|
(2,683)
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
7,555
|
|
7,266
|
Derivative assets
|
42
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets (Note 1)
|
127
|
|
27
|
Total assets
|
$
|
8,553
|
|
$
|
8,203
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
721
|
|
$
|
514
|
Accrued and other current liabilities (Note 1)
|
225
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
80
|
|
23
|
Total current liabilities
|
1,026
|
|
715
|
Deferred income taxes
|
270
|
|
201
|
Long-term debt, net
|
2,157
|
|
2,485
|
Derivative liabilities
|
29
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities (Note 1)
|
510
|
|
487
|
Contingent liabilities and commitments (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (100 million shares authorized at $0.01 par value; no shares outstanding)
|
—
|
|
—
|
Common stock (2 billion shares authorized at $0.01 par value; 422.3 million and 420.6 million shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018)
|
4
|
|
4
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
7,737
|
|
7,734
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(3,180)
|
|
(3,437)
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
4,561
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
8,553
|
|
$
|
8,203
|
See accompanying notes.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Revenues:
|
(Millions, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales
|
$
|
511
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
$
|
828
|
Natural gas sales
|
16
|
|
16
|
|
41
|
|
33
|
Natural gas liquid sales
|
31
|
|
36
|
|
64
|
|
66
|
Total product revenues
|
558
|
|
520
|
|
1,065
|
|
927
|
Net gain (loss) on derivatives
|
78
|
|
(154)
|
|
(129)
|
|
(223)
|
Commodity management
|
58
|
|
64
|
|
117
|
|
100
|
Other
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
Total revenues
|
695
|
|
430
|
|
1,054
|
|
804
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
221
|
|
197
|
|
440
|
|
358
|
Lease and facility operating
|
94
|
|
59
|
|
180
|
|
114
|
Gathering, processing and transportation
|
40
|
|
20
|
|
82
|
|
38
|
Taxes other than income
|
43
|
|
41
|
|
82
|
|
71
|
Exploration (Note 4)
|
24
|
|
17
|
|
48
|
|
36
|
General and administrative (including equity-based compensation of $8 million, $10 million, $16 million and $17 million for the respective periods)
|
48
|
|
44
|
|
95
|
|
87
|
Commodity management
|
41
|
|
54
|
|
90
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other—net
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
5
|
|
4
|
Total costs and expenses
|
514
|
|
433
|
|
1,022
|
|
801
|
Operating income (loss)
|
181
|
|
(3)
|
|
32
|
|
3
|
Interest expense
|
(40)
|
|
(39)
|
|
(81)
|
|
(85)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
(71)
|
|
—
|
|
(71)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on equity method investment transactions
|
247
|
|
—
|
|
373
|
|
—
|
Investment income (loss) and other
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
389
|
|
(112)
|
|
327
|
|
(153)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
84
|
|
(33)
|
|
70
|
|
(48)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
305
|
|
(79)
|
|
257
|
|
(105)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
(91)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
305
|
|
(81)
|
|
257
|
|
(196)
|
Less: Dividends on preferred stock
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to WPX Energy, Inc. common stockholders
|
$
|
305
|
|
$
|
(85)
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(204)
|
Amounts available to WPX Energy, Inc. common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
305
|
|
$
|
(83)
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(113)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
(91)
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
305
|
|
$
|
(85)
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(204)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
$
|
(0.21)
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
$
|
(0.28)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.23)
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
$
|
(0.21)
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
$
|
(0.51)
|
Basic weighted-average shares
|
422.5
|
|
400.0
|
|
421.8
|
|
399.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares
|
423.5
|
|
400.0
|
|
423.6
|
|
399.3
|
See accompanying notes.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-In-
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,729
|
|
$
|
(3,485)
|
|
$
|
4,248
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
305
|
|
305
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax impact
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,737
|
|
$
|
(3,180)
|
|
$
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2018
|
$
|
232
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,473
|
|
$
|
(3,703)
|
|
$
|
4,006
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(81)
|
|
(81)
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax impact
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4)
|
|
—
|
|
(4)
|
Balance at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
232
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,483
|
|
$
|
(3,784)
|
|
$
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-In-
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,734
|
|
$
|
(3,437)
|
|
$
|
4,301
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
257
|
|
257
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax impact
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,737
|
|
$
|
(3,180)
|
|
$
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
232
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,479
|
|
$
|
(3,588)
|
|
$
|
4,127
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(196)
|
|
(196)
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax impact
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(8)
|
|
—
|
|
(8)
|
Balance at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
232
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
7,483
|
|
$
|
(3,784)
|
|
$
|
3,935
|
See accompanying notes.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Operating Activities(a)
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(196)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
440
|
|
365
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
69
|
|
(75)
|
Provision for impairment of properties and equipment (including certain exploration expenses)
|
41
|
|
37
|
Gains related to equity method investment transactions
|
(373)
|
|
—
|
Net (gain) loss on derivatives
|
129
|
|
223
|
Net settlements related to derivatives
|
(1)
|
|
(133)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of stock-based awards
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
71
|
Net (gain) loss on sales of assets including discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
151
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
(145)
|
|
(16)
|
Inventories
|
2
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
(1)
|
|
4
|
Accounts payable
|
203
|
|
73
|
Federal income taxes receivable
|
38
|
|
—
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
(17)
|
|
(59)
|
Liabilities accrued in prior years for retained transportation and gathering contracts related to discontinued operations
|
(15)
|
|
(28)
|
Other, including changes in other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
(10)
|
|
4
|
Net cash provided by operating activities(a)
|
634
|
|
428
|
Investing Activities(a)
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures(b)
|
(774)
|
|
(660)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets and equity method investment transactions
|
590
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to or purchases of equity method investments
|
(18)
|
|
(23)
|
Distributions from equity method investments
|
7
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(a)
|
(195)
|
|
3
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from common stock
|
1
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock
|
—
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on credit facility
|
1,002
|
|
303
|
Payments on credit facility
|
(1,332)
|
|
(303)
|
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of discount
|
—
|
|
494
|
Payments for retirement of long-term debt, including premium
|
—
|
|
(986)
|
Taxes paid for shares withheld
|
(15)
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt issuance costs and credit facility amendment fees
|
—
|
|
(10)
|
Other
|
14
|
|
1
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(330)
|
|
(516)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
109
|
|
(85)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
|
18
|
|
201
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
|
$
|
127
|
|
$
|
116
|
__________
|
|
|
|
(a) Amounts reflect continuing and discontinued operations unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
|
(b) Increase to properties and equipment
|
$
|
(766)
|
|
$
|
(705)
|
Changes in related accounts payable and accounts receivable
|
(8)
|
|
45
|
Capital expenditures
|
$
|
(774)
|
|
$
|
(660)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
Operations of our company include oil, natural gas and NGL development and production primarily located in Texas, New Mexico and North Dakota. We specialize in development and production from tight-sands and shale formations in the Delaware and Williston Basins. Associated with our commodity production are sales and marketing activities, referred to as commodity management activities, that include oil and natural gas purchased from other third-parties in our operating areas in conjunction with the management of various commodity related contracts such as transportation.
We have sold certain operations which are reported as discontinued operations and are discussed in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The consolidated businesses represented herein as WPX Energy, Inc. is also referred to as “WPX,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our.”
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements do not include all the notes included in our annual financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our financial position at June 30, 2019, results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, changes in equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The Company has no element of comprehensive income (loss) other than net income (loss).
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Our continuing operations comprise a single business segment, which includes the development, production and commodity management activities of oil, natural gas and NGLs in the United States.
Discontinued Operations
See Note 2 for a discussion of discontinued operations. Unless indicated otherwise, the information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements relates to continuing operations.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases, effective January 1, 2019. The standard requires the recognition of right of use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. Under the new standard, a determination is made at the inception of a contract as to whether the contract is, or contains a lease. Leases convey the right to control the use of an identified asset in exchange for consideration. We used a transition method that applies the new lease standard at January 1, 2019, and recognizes any cumulative-effect adjustments to the opening balance of 2019 retained earnings. The cumulative effect adjustment was not material. Upon adoption, we recorded initial right of use assets of $90 million in other noncurrent assets, noncurrent lease liabilities of $46 million in other noncurrent liabilities and current lease liabilities of $44 million in accrued and other current liabilities. The Company applied a policy election to exclude short-term leases (leases with a term of 12 months or less) from balance sheet recognition and also elected certain practical expedients at adoption including the treatment of lease and non-lease components as a single lease component for all asset classes. As permitted, we applied certain other practical expedients in which we elected not to reassess:
•whether existing contracts are or contain leases;
•lease classification for any expired or existing leases;
•initial direct costs for any existing lease; and
•whether existing land easements and rights of way, that were not previously accounted for as leases, are or contain a lease.
See Note 9 for additional information related to our contracts that are or contain leases.
We adopted ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) effective January 1, 2019. This ASU provides guidance for various components of hedge accounting including hedge ineffectiveness, the expansion of types of permissible hedging
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
strategies, reduced complexity in the application of the long-haul method for fair value hedges and reduced complexity in assessment of effectiveness. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company. However, we would be impacted if we were to apply hedge accounting in a future period.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. This ASU, as further amended, affects trade receivables, financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. This ASU will replace the currently required incurred loss approach with an expected loss model for instruments measured at amortized cost and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU will be applied using a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the Company does not have a history of credit losses.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose additional information about significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 measurements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The Company does not expect any significant impact on its consolidated financial statements from the adoption of this standard.
Note 2. Discontinued Operations
In first-quarter 2018, we sold our properties in the San Juan Gallup oil play and we received approximately $667 million (subject to post-closing adjustments). In addition, the purchaser assumed approximately $309 million of gathering and processing commitments; however, WPX has left in place a performance guarantee with respect to these commitments. We believed and continue to believe that any future performance under this guarantee obligation is highly unlikely given our understanding of the buyer’s credit position, the indemnity arrangement between the Company and the purchaser, and the declining size of the obligations subject to the guarantee over time. As part of the divestiture, we had to determine the fair value of the guarantee that was provided. We estimated the fair value of the guarantee to be approximately $9 million based on the factors mentioned above along with projections of estimated future volume throughputs and risk adjusted discount rates, all of which are Level 3 inputs. This amount is included in our calculation of the loss on sale. We recorded a total loss on the sale of $147 million in 2018.
Our discontinued operations consist of the previously owned properties in the San Juan Basin and accretion on certain transportation and gathering obligations retained and recognized in prior years associated with our exit from the Powder River Basin.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations
The following table presents the results of our discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and the three months ended June 30, 2018, our discontinued operations activity was minimal and therefore is not included in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
Lease and facility operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Gathering, processing and transportation
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion for transportation and gathering obligations retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Other—net
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150)
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(91)
|
Cash Flows Attributable to Discontinued Operations
Cash outflows related to previous accruals for the Powder River Basin gathering and transportation contracts retained by WPX were $15 million and $28 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. In addition, cash flows related to San Juan Gallup includes $45 million of cash provided by operating activities, excluding income taxes and changes in working capital items, and $29 million of cash capital expenditures within investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 3. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share from Continuing Operations
The following table summarizes the calculation of earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
305
|
|
$
|
(79)
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(105)
|
Less: Dividends on preferred stock
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to WPX Energy, Inc. common stockholders for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
$
|
305
|
|
$
|
(83)
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(113)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares
|
422.5
|
|
400.0
|
|
421.8
|
|
399.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities(a)
|
1.0
|
|
—
|
|
1.8
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares
|
423.5
|
|
400.0
|
|
423.6
|
|
399.3
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
$
|
(0.21)
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
$
|
(0.28)
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
$
|
(0.21)
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
$
|
(0.28)
|
__________
(a) Certain amounts of nonvested restricted stock units and awards and stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share as their inclusion would be antidilutive due to (i) a loss from continuing operations attributable to WPX Energy, Inc. available to common stockholders; (ii) application, in 2018, of the if-converted method to common shares issuable upon assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock; or (iii) application of the treasury stock method to certain nonvested restricted stock units and awards. The remaining Series A mandatory convertible preferred stock converted to common shares in third-quarter 2018. The excluded amounts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average nonvested restricted stock units and awards
|
—
|
|
2.9
|
|
—
|
|
3.0
|
Weighted-average stock options
|
—
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
0.2
|
Common shares issuable upon assumed conversion of 6.25% Series A mandatory convertible preferred stock
|
Not
Applicable
|
|
19.8
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
|
19.8
|
Nonvested restricted stock units and awards antidilutive under the treasury stock method
|
2.6
|
|
0.7
|
|
2.6
|
|
0.7
|
Stock options of approximately 0.9 million and 0.6 million that were outstanding at June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of weighted-average stock options due to the option exercise price exceeding the respective second quarter weighted-average market price of our common shares.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 4. Asset Sale, Equity Method Investment Transactions and Exploration Expenses
Asset Sale
During the first quarter of 2019, we closed on the sale of certain non-core properties, primarily proved, in the Delaware Basin which were held for sale at December 31, 2018. We received approximately $83 million in proceeds. No gain or loss was recorded on this transaction.
Equity Method Investment Transactions
During the first quarter of 2019, we closed on the sale of our 20 percent equity interest in the Whitewater natural gas pipeline. The net book value of this equity method investment at the time of disposition was approximately $15 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a $126 million gain.
During the second quarter of 2019, we received a distribution of approximately $357 million related to our 25 percent equity interest in the Oryx pipeline partnership after the underlying assets were sold. This transaction is subject to post-closing adjustments. The net book value of this equity method investment was approximately $110 million as of the closing date. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of $247 million.
Exploration Expenses
The following table presents a summary of exploration expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved leasehold property amortization
|
$
|
21
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
$
|
33
|
Geologic and geophysical costs
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exploration expenses
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
$
|
36
|
Note 5. Inventories
The following table presents a summary of our inventories as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2019
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Material, supplies and other
|
$
|
41
|
|
$
|
46
|
Commodity production in transit or storage
|
4
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
$
|
45
|
|
$
|
48
|
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 6. Debt and Banking Arrangements
The following table presents a summary of our debt as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2019
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Credit facility agreement
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
330
|
6.000% Senior Notes due 2022
|
529
|
|
529
|
8.250% Senior Notes due 2023
|
500
|
|
500
|
5.250% Senior Notes due 2024
|
650
|
|
650
|
5.750% Senior Notes due 2026
|
500
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
$
|
2,509
|
Less: Debt issuance costs on long-term debt(a)
|
22
|
|
24
|
Total long-term debt, net(a)
|
$
|
2,157
|
|
$
|
2,485
|
__________
(a)Debt issuance costs related to our Credit Facility are recorded in other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Credit Facility
As of June 30, 2019, we had no borrowings outstanding and $42 million of letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility and we were in compliance with our financial covenants with full access to the Credit Facility.
On April 22, 2019, the Company entered into a Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, the Swingline Lender and each of the issuing banks party thereto (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility, as amended, gives the Company the option, if certain conditions are met, to elect during any Collateral Trigger Period that scheduled redeterminations of the Borrowing Base be made annually on April 1 instead of semi-annually.
Additionally in April 2019, the Borrowing Base was increased to $2.1 billion and will remain in effect until the next Redetermination Date as described above. At this time, the Credit Facility Agreement is limited by the total commitments which remained at $1.5 billion.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for additional information on covenants related to our Credit Facility. As of the date of this filing, we are in compliance with all terms, conditions and financial covenants of the Credit Facility, as amended.
Senior Notes
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for additional discussion related to our senior notes.
Note 7. Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The following table presents the provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
State
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
75
|
|
(28)
|
|
63
|
|
(37)
|
State
|
7
|
|
(5)
|
|
6
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
(33)
|
|
69
|
|
(48)
|
Total provision (benefit)
|
$
|
84
|
|
$
|
(33)
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
$
|
(48)
|
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2019, differs slightly from the federal statutory rate of 21 percent due to to the effect of state income taxes and equity-based compensation, partially offset by the reversal of the valuation allowance on capital loss carryovers resulting from the expected capital gain from a 2019 transaction involving an equity interest in a partnership.
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2018, differs from the federal statutory rate of 21 percent due to the impact of equity-based compensation and the effect of state income taxes.
The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2019, differs slightly from the federal statutory rate of 21 percent due to to the effect of state income taxes and equity-based compensation, partially offset by the reversal of the valuation allowance on capital loss carryovers resulting from the expected capital gains from the 2019 transactions involving equity interests in partnerships.
The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2018, differs from the federal statutory rate of 21 percent due to the impact of equity-based compensation and the effect of an adjustment to state deferred taxes as a result of a decrease in the blended state income tax rate due to changes in state apportionment factors resulting from the divestment of our San Juan Basin assets.
We have recorded valuation allowances against deferred tax assets attributable primarily to certain state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers. When assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we primarily consider future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. To a lesser extent we may also consider future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryovers, and tax-planning strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented to accelerate taxable amounts to utilize expiring carryovers. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be materially different from those recorded, as influenced by future operational performance, potential changes in jurisdictional income tax laws and other circumstances surrounding the actual realization of related tax assets. Valuation allowances that we have recorded are due to our expectation that we will not have sufficient income, or income of a sufficient character, in those jurisdictions to which the associated deferred tax asset applies. We have not recorded a valuation allowance against our federal NOL carryover, but a valuation allowance could be required in future periods if the federal NOL carryover continues to increase or circumstances change.
The ability of WPX to utilize loss carryovers or minimum tax credits to reduce future federal taxable income and income tax could be subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. The utilization of such carryovers may be limited upon the occurrence of certain ownership changes during any three-year period resulting in an aggregate change of more than 50 percent in beneficial ownership (an “Ownership Change”). As of June 30, 2019, we do not believe that an Ownership Change has occurred for WPX, but an Ownership Change did occur for the company we acquired in 2015 (“RKI”). Therefore, there is an annual limitation on the benefit that WPX can claim from RKI carryovers that arose prior to the acquisition.
Pursuant to our tax sharing agreement with The Williams Companies, Inc. ("Williams"), we remain responsible for the tax from audit adjustments related to our business for periods prior to our spin-off from Williams on December 31, 2011. The 2011 consolidated tax filing by Williams is currently being audited by the IRS and is the only pre-spin-off period for which we continue to have exposure to audit adjustments as part of Williams. In 2017, the IRS proposed an adjustment related to our business for which a payment to Williams could be required. We, along with Williams, have evaluated the issue and are in the process of protesting the adjustment within the normal Appeals process of the IRS. In addition, the alternative minimum tax credit deferred tax asset that was allocated to us by Williams at the time of the spin-off could change due to audit adjustments unrelated to our business. Any such adjustments to this allocated deferred tax asset will not be known until the IRS examination is completed but is not expected to result in a cash settlement with Williams. However, if the Company has to amend filed returns whereby a refund of AMT credits are received, the Company may have to remit cash to the IRS.
As of June 30, 2019, the Company has approximately $8 million of unrecognized tax benefits which is offset by an increase in deferred tax assets of approximately $7 million. Currently, we do not expect ultimate resolution of our uncertain tax position during the next 12 months.
Note 8. Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Contingent Liabilities
Royalty litigation
In October 2011, a potential class of royalty interest owners in New Mexico and Colorado filed a complaint against us in the County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico. The complaint presently alleges failure to pay royalty on hydrocarbons including drip
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
condensate, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, fraudulent concealment, conversion, misstatement of the value of gas and affiliated sales, breach of duty to market hydrocarbons in Colorado, breach of implied duty to market, violation of the New Mexico Oil and Gas Proceeds Payment Act, and bad faith breach of contract. Plaintiffs sought monetary damages and a declaratory judgment enjoining activities relating to production, payments and future reporting. This matter was removed to the United States District Court for New Mexico where the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. In March 2017, plaintiffs appealed the denial of class certification to the Tenth Circuit and on September 21, 2018 the Tenth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. On January 22, 2019, plaintiffs’ filed a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, which was denied on April 1, 2019. At this time, we believe that our royalty calculations were properly determined in accordance with the appropriate contractual arrangements and applicable laws.
Other producers have been pursuing administrative appeals with a federal regulatory agency and have been in discussions with a state agency in New Mexico regarding certain deductions, comprised primarily of processing, treating and transportation costs, used in the calculation of royalties. Although we are not a party to those matters, we are monitoring them to evaluate whether their resolution might have the potential for unfavorable impact on our results of operations. Certain outstanding issues in those matters could be material to us. We received notice from the U.S. Department of Interior Office of Natural Resources Revenue (“ONRR”) in the fourth quarter of 2010, intending to clarify the guidelines for calculating federal royalties on conventional gas production applicable to many of our federal leases in New Mexico. The guidelines for New Mexico properties were revised slightly in September 2013 as a result of additional work performed by the ONRR. The revisions did not change the basic function of the original guidance. The ONRR’s guidance provides its view as to how much of a producer’s bundled fees for transportation and processing can be deducted from the royalty payment. We believe using these guidelines would not result in a material difference in determining our historical federal royalty payments for our leases in New Mexico. Similar guidelines were recently issued for certain leases in Colorado and, as in the case of the New Mexico guidelines, we do not believe that they will result in a material difference to our historical federal royalty payments. ONRR has asked producers to attempt to evaluate the deductibility of these fees directly with the midstream companies that transport and process gas.
Environmental matters
The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), other federal agencies, and various state and local regulatory agencies and jurisdictions routinely promulgate and propose new rules, and issue updated guidance to existing rules. These new rules and rulemakings include, but are not limited to, new air quality standards for ground level ozone, methane, green completions, and hydraulic fracturing and water standards. We are unable to estimate the costs of asset additions or modifications necessary to comply with these new regulations due to uncertainty created by the various legal challenges to these regulations and the need for further specific regulatory guidance.
Matters related to Williams’ former power business
In connection with a Separation and Distribution Agreement between WPX and Williams, Williams is obligated to indemnify and hold us harmless from any losses arising out of liabilities assumed by us for the pending litigation described below relating to the reporting of certain natural gas-related information to trade publications.
Civil suits based on allegations of manipulating published gas price indices have been brought against us and others, seeking unspecified amounts of damages. We are currently a defendant in class action litigation and other litigation originally filed in state court in Colorado, Kansas, Missouri and Wisconsin and brought on behalf of direct and indirect purchasers of natural gas in those states. These cases were transferred to the federal court in Nevada. In 2008, the court granted summary judgment in the Colorado case in favor of us and most of the other defendants based on plaintiffs’ lack of standing. On January 8, 2009, the court denied the plaintiffs’ request for reconsideration of the Colorado dismissal and entered judgment in our favor. On August 6, 2018, the Ninth Circuit reversed the orders denying class certification and remanded to the MDL Court. On September 7, 2018, those plaintiffs filed a motion seeking remand to the originally filed district courts of Missouri, Kansas and Wisconsin. In February, 2019, settlement agreements with the Kansas and Missouri class claimants were executed. A final fairness hearing seeking the court's approval of the settlement is set for August 5, 2019. In the Wisconsin class action, defendants' motion for entry of their proposed order denying class certification remains pending, along with the plaintiffs' motion to remand the case to the originally filed district court.
In the other cases, on July 18, 2011, the Nevada district court granted our joint motions for summary judgment to preclude the plaintiffs’ state law claims because the federal Natural Gas Act gives the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission exclusive jurisdiction to resolve those issues. The court also denied the plaintiffs’ class certification motion as moot. The plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On April 10, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in the In re: Western States Wholesale Antitrust Litigation, holding that the Natural Gas Act does not preempt the plaintiffs’ state antitrust claims and reversing the summary judgment previously entered
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
in favor of the defendants. The U.S. Supreme Court granted Defendants’ writ of certiorari. On April 21, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the state antitrust claims are not preempted by the federal Natural Gas Act. On March 7, 2016, the putative class plaintiffs in several of the cases filed their motions for class certification. On March 30, 2017, the court denied the motions for class certification, which decision was appealed on June 20, 2017. On May 24, 2016, in Reorganized FLI Inc. v. Williams Companies, Inc., the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety, and an agreed amended judgment was entered by the court on January 4, 2017. Reorganized FLI, Inc. appealed this decision and on March 27, 2018, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case to the MDL Court, and the MDL Court has now remanded the case to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The parties have filed numerous motions for summary judgment, reconsideration and remand. Because of the uncertainty around pending unresolved issues, including an insufficient description of the purported classes and other related matters, we cannot reasonably estimate a range of potential exposure at this time.
Other Indemnifications
Pursuant to various purchase and sale agreements relating to divested businesses and assets, including the agreements pursuant to which we divested our Piceance and San Juan Basin operations, we have indemnified certain purchasers against liabilities that they may incur with respect to the businesses and assets acquired from us. The indemnities provided to the purchasers are customary in sale transactions and are contingent upon the purchasers incurring liabilities that are not otherwise recoverable from third parties. The indemnities generally relate to breaches of representations and warranties, tax liabilities, historic litigation, personal injury, environmental matters and rights-of-way. Additionally, Federal and state laws in areas of former operations may require previous operators to perform in certain circumstances where the buyer/operator may no longer be able to perform. Such duties may include plugging and abandoning wells or responsibility for surface agreements.
The indemnity provided to the purchaser of the entity that held our Piceance Basin operations relates in substantial part to liabilities arising in connection with litigation over the appropriate calculation of royalty payments. Plaintiffs in such litigation have asserted claims regarding, among other things, the method by which we took transportation costs into account when calculating royalty payments.
As of June 30, 2019, we have not received any additional significant claims against any of these indemnities and thus have no basis from which to estimate any reasonably possible loss beyond any amount already accrued. Further, we do not expect any of the indemnities provided pursuant to the sales agreements to have a material impact on our future financial position. However, if a claim for indemnity is brought against us in the future, it may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the claim is made.
In connection with the separation from Williams, we agreed to indemnify and hold Williams harmless from any losses resulting from the operation of our business or arising out of liabilities assumed by us. Similarly, Williams has agreed to indemnify and hold us harmless from any losses resulting from the operation of its business or arising out of liabilities assumed by it.
Summary
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had accrued approximately $11 million for loss contingencies associated with royalty litigation and other contingencies. In certain circumstances, we may be eligible for insurance recoveries, or reimbursement from others. Any such recoveries or reimbursements will be recognized only when realizable.
Management, including internal counsel, currently believes that the ultimate resolution of the foregoing matters, taken as a whole and after consideration of amounts accrued, insurance coverage, recovery from customers or other indemnification arrangements, is not expected to have a materially adverse effect upon our future liquidity or financial position; however, it could be material to our results of operations in any given year.
Commitments
During 2019, primarily in the second quarter, we contracted for additional oil and natural gas transportation capacity to other locations in attempts to avoid location constraints and obtain more favorable pricing differentials. This capacity is associated with projects for which the counterparties have not yet begun construction. Related minimum commitments, when construction is complete and facilities are in service, total approximately $800 million over a five to ten year period with annual demand payments, beginning in 2021, ranging from approximately $38 million to $97 million.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 9. Leases
Our contracts that are leases or contain leases primarily relate to drilling rigs, compression units and office space. Leases are recorded on the balance sheet when the lease term exceeds one year and we direct the use of an identified asset while receiving substantially all of the economic benefit of the asset. Right-of-use assets are included in other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Lease liabilities are included in accrued and other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We have elected to include both lease and non-lease components for all significant asset classes as a single lease component for measurement purposes. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet and lease expense for these leases is recognized as incurred. We have elected to include lease costs associated with lease terms of one month or less in our short-term lease disclosure below.
We use judgments and assumptions to determine our discount rate and whether a contract contains a lease. The discount rate used to determine the lease payment liability is based on our estimated incremental borrowing rate.
Certain of our leases include rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. From time to time we may enter into lease contracts that commence in future periods. Lease contracts that will commence subsequent to June 30, 2019 are not significant.
The following tables include quantitative disclosures related to our leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2019
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Lease Costs:
|
|
|
Leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
Operating lease cost—drilling rigs(a)
|
$
|
20
|
|
Operating lease cost—other(a)
|
9
|
|
Variable lease cost—drilling rigs(a)
|
3
|
|
Variable lease cost—other(a)
|
2
|
|
Short-term leases:
|
|
|
Drilling rigs(b)
|
20
|
|
Other(b)
|
59
|
|
Total lease cost
|
$
|
113
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
Cash paid for amount included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
|
|
|
Operating cash flows used for operating leases(a)
|
$
|
9
|
|
Investing cash flows used for operating leases(a)
|
$
|
20
|
|
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
|
$
|
32
|
|
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)
|
1.81 years
|
|
Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases
|
5
|
%
|
|
__________
(a)Amounts are presented before recovery of amounts billed to or reimbursed by other working interest owners.
(b)Includes variable lease costs on short-term leases.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The following tables include quantitative disclosures related to our leases as of June 30, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Rigs
|
|
Real Estate, Compression and Other
|
|
Total Undiscounted Cash Flows
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity of Lease Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2019 through December 2019
|
$
|
20
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
30
|
2020
|
36
|
|
17
|
|
53
|
2021
|
4
|
|
10
|
|
14
|
2022
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
2023
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
Current lease liabilities
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
$
|
54
|
Noncurrent lease liabilities
|
21
|
|
19
|
|
40
|
Total lease liabilities
|
$
|
57
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
$
|
94
|
Difference between undiscounted cash flows and discounted cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
Total right-of-use assets on Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
Note 10. Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents, by level within the fair value hierarchy, certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis for disclosure. The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value due to the nature of the instrument and/or the short-term maturity of these instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy derivative assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
178
|
Energy derivative liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
37
|
Total debt(a)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
__________
(a)The carrying value of total debt, excluding debt issuance costs, was $2,179 million and $2,509 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The fair value of our debt, which also excludes debt issuance costs, is determined on market rates and the prices of similar securities with similar terms and credit ratings.
Energy derivatives include commodity-based exchange-traded contracts and over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts. Exchange-traded contracts include futures, swaps and options. OTC contracts may include forwards, swaps, options or swaptions. These are carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Many contracts have bid and ask prices that can be observed in the market. Our policy is to use a mid-market pricing (the mid-point price between bid and ask prices) convention to value individual positions and then adjust on a portfolio level to a point within the bid and ask range that represents our best estimate of fair value. For offsetting positions by location, the mid-market price is used to measure both the long and short positions.
The determination of fair value for our derivative assets and liabilities also incorporates the time value of money and various credit risk factors which can include the credit standing of the counterparties involved, master netting arrangements, the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash collateral posted and letters of credit) and our nonperformance risk on our liabilities. The determination of the fair value of our derivative liabilities does not consider noncash collateral credit enhancements.
Forward, swap, option and swaption contracts are considered Level 2 and are valued using an income approach including present value techniques and option pricing models. Option contracts, which hedge future sales of our production, are structured
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
as calls and collars that are financially settled. All of our financial options are valued using an industry standard Black-Scholes option pricing model. In connection with swaps, we may sell call options or swaptions to the swap counterparties in exchange for receiving premium hedge prices on the swaps. The sold calls or swaptions establish a maximum price we will receive for the volumes under contract and are financially settled. Significant inputs into our Level 2 valuations include commodity prices, implied volatility and interest rates, as well as considering executed transactions or broker quotes corroborated by other market data. These broker quotes are based on observable market prices at which transactions could currently be executed. In certain instances where these inputs are not observable for all periods, relationships of observable market data and historical observations are used as a means to estimate fair value. Also categorized as Level 2 is the fair value of our debt, which is determined on market rates and the prices of similar securities with similar terms and credit ratings. Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2.
Our energy derivatives portfolio is largely comprised of over-the-counter products or like products and the tenure of our derivatives portfolio extends through the end of 2023. Due to the nature of the products and tenure, we are consistently able to obtain market pricing. All pricing is reviewed on a daily basis and is formally validated with broker quotes or market indications and documented on a quarterly basis.
Certain instruments trade with lower availability of pricing information. These instruments are valued with a present value technique using inputs that may not be readily observable or corroborated by other market data. These instruments are classified within Level 3 when these inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value. We had instruments totaling less than $1 million and $3 million included in Level 3 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Reclassifications of fair value between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, if applicable, are made at the end of each quarter. No significant transfers occurred during the periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
There have been no material changes in the fair value of our net energy derivatives and other assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Note 11. Derivatives and Concentration of Credit Risk
Energy Commodity Derivatives
Risk Management Activities
We are exposed to market risk from changes in energy commodity prices within our operations. We utilize derivatives to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted sales of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids attributable to commodity price risk.
We produce, buy and sell crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids at different locations throughout the United States. To reduce exposure to a decrease in revenues from fluctuations in commodity market prices, we enter into futures contracts, swap agreements and financial option contracts to mitigate the price risk on forecasted sales of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. We have also entered into basis swap agreements to reduce the locational price risk associated with our producing basins. Our financial option contracts are either purchased or sold options, or a combination of options that comprise a net purchased option, zero-cost collar or swaption.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Derivatives related to production
The following table sets forth the derivative notional volumes of the net long (short) positions that are economic hedges of production volumes, which are included in our commodity derivatives portfolio as of June 30, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Period
|
|
Contract Type (a)
|
|
Location
|
|
Notional Volume (b)
|
|
Weighted Average
Price (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
WTI
|
|
(53,000)
|
|
$
|
54.62
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Midland/Cushing
|
|
(22,000)
|
|
$
|
(1.37)
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Nymex CMA Roll
|
|
(16,630)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Magellan East Houston
|
|
(1,663)
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Magellan East Houston/Midland
|
|
(5,652)
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Argus LLS/Midland
|
|
(1,663)
|
|
$
|
8.60
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Magellan East Houston/Argus LLS
|
|
(1,663)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Clearbrook
|
|
(8,000)
|
|
$
|
(3.23)
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Fixed Price Calls
|
|
WTI
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
$
|
54.08
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Fixed Price Collars
|
|
WTI
|
|
(8,000)
|
|
$50.00 - $60.19
|
Crude Oil
|
|
2020
|
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
WTI
|
|
(20,000)
|
|
$
|
59.03
|
Crude Oil
|
|
2020
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Midland/Cushing
|
|
(7,486)
|
|
$
|
(1.31)
|
Crude Oil
|
|
2020
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Brent/WTI Spread
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
$
|
8.36
|
Crude Oil
|
|
2020
|
|
Fixed Price Collars
|
|
WTI
|
|
(20,000)
|
|
$53.33 - $63.48
|
Crude Oil
|
|
2021
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Brent/WTI Spread
|
|
(1,000)
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
Crude Oil
|
|
2022
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Brent/WTI Spread
|
|
(1,000)
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Henry Hub
|
|
(110)
|
|
$
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Permian
|
|
(25)
|
|
$
|
(0.39)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Waha
|
|
(15)
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Houston Ship Channel
|
|
(30)
|
|
$
|
(0.09)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2020
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Waha
|
|
(60)
|
|
$
|
(0.79)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2021
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Waha
|
|
(70)
|
|
$
|
(0.59)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2022
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Waha
|
|
(70)
|
|
$
|
(0.57)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2023
|
|
Basis Swaps
|
|
Waha
|
|
(70)
|
|
$
|
(0.51)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
(a)Derivatives related to crude oil production are fixed price swaps settled on the business day average, basis swaps, fixed price calls, collars or swaptions. The derivatives related to natural gas production are fixed price swaps, basis swaps, fixed price calls or swaptions. In connection with swaps, we may sell call options or swaptions to the swap counterparties in exchange for receiving premium hedge prices on the swaps. The sold call or swaption establishes a maximum price we will receive for the volumes under contract and are financially settled. Basis swaps for the Nymex CMA (Calendar Monthly Average) Roll location are pricing adjustments to the trade month versus the delivery month for contract pricing. Basis swaps for the Brent/WTI location are priced off the Brent and WTI futures spread.
(b)Crude oil volumes are reported in Bbl/day and natural gas volumes are reported in BBtu/day.
(c)The weighted average price for crude oil is reported in $/Bbl and natural gas is reported in $/MMBtu.
Fair values and gains (losses)
Our derivatives are presented as separate line items in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as current and noncurrent derivative assets and liabilities. Derivatives are classified as current or noncurrent based on the contractual timing of expected future net cash flows of individual contracts. The expected future net cash flows for derivatives classified as current are expected to occur within the next 12 months. The fair value amounts are presented on a gross basis and do not reflect the netting of asset and liability positions permitted under the terms of our master netting arrangements. Further, the amounts below do not include cash held on deposit in margin accounts that we have received or remitted to collateralize certain derivative positions.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
We enter into commodity derivative contracts that serve as economic hedges but are not designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes as we do not utilize this method of accounting for derivative instruments. Net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations includes net settlements to be paid of $10 million and $1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $78 million and $133 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.
The cash flow impact of our derivative activities is presented as separate line items within the operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Offsetting of derivative assets and liabilities
The following table presents our gross and net derivative assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount Presented on Balance Sheet
|
|
Netting Adjustments (a)
|
|
|
|
Net Amount
|
June 30, 2019
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets with right of offset or master netting agreements
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
(72)
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
Derivative liabilities with right of offset or master netting agreements
|
$
|
(109)
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
$
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets with right of offset or master netting agreements
|
$
|
178
|
|
$
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
Derivative liabilities with right of offset or master netting agreements
|
$
|
(37)
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
__________
(a)With all of our financial trading counterparties, we have agreements in place that allow for the financial right of offset for derivative assets and derivative liabilities at settlement or in the event of a default under the agreements. Additionally, we have negotiated master netting agreements with some of our counterparties. These master netting agreements allow multiple entities that have multiple underlying agreements the ability to net derivative assets and derivative liabilities at settlement or in the event of a default or a termination under one or more of the underlying contracts.
Credit-risk-related features
Certain of our derivative contracts contain credit-risk-related provisions that would require us, under certain events, to post additional collateral in support of our net derivative liability positions. These credit-risk-related provisions require us to post collateral in the form of cash or letters of credit when our net liability positions exceed an established credit threshold. The credit thresholds are typically based on our senior unsecured debt ratings from Standard and Poor’s and/or Moody’s Investment Services. Under these contracts, a credit ratings decline would lower our credit thresholds, thus requiring us to post additional collateral. We also have contracts that contain adequate assurance provisions giving the counterparty the right to request collateral in an amount that corresponds to the outstanding net liability.
As of June 30, 2019, we had no collateral posted to derivative counterparties, to support the aggregate fair value of our net $37 million derivative liability position (reflecting master netting arrangements in place with certain counterparties), which includes a reduction of less than $1 million to our liability balance for our own nonperformance risk. Assuming our credit thresholds were eliminated and a call for adequate assurance under the credit risk provisions in our derivative contracts was triggered, the additional collateral that we would have been required to post at June 30, 2019 was $37 million.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Cash equivalents
Our cash equivalents are primarily invested in funds with high-quality, short-term securities and instruments that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are carried on a gross basis, with no discounting, less the allowance for doubtful accounts. We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts based on existing economic conditions, the financial conditions of the customers and the amount and age of past due accounts. Receivables are considered past due if full payment is not received by the contractual due date. Past due accounts are generally written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts only after all collection attempts have been exhausted. A portion of our receivables are from joint interest owners of properties we operate. Thus, we may have the ability to withhold future revenue disbursements to recover any non-payment of joint interest billings.
WPX Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Derivative assets and liabilities
We have a risk of loss from counterparties not performing pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. Counterparty performance can be influenced by changes in the economy and regulatory issues, among other factors. Risk of loss is impacted by several factors, including credit considerations and the regulatory environment in which a counterparty transacts. We attempt to minimize credit-risk exposure to derivative counterparties and brokers through formal credit policies, consideration of credit ratings from public ratings agencies, monitoring procedures, master netting agreements and collateral support under certain circumstances. Collateral support could include letters of credit, payment under margin agreements and guarantees of payment by credit worthy parties.
We also enter into master netting agreements to mitigate counterparty performance and credit risk. During 2019 and 2018, we did not incur any significant losses due to counterparty bankruptcy filings. We assess our credit exposure on a net basis to reflect master netting agreements in place with certain counterparties. We offset our credit exposure to each counterparty with amounts we owe the counterparty under derivative contracts.
Our gross and net credit exposure from our derivative contracts were $123 million and $51 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2019. All of our credit exposure is with investment grade financial institutions. We determine investment grade primarily using publicly available credit ratings. We include counterparties with a minimum S&P’s rating of BBB- or Moody’s Investors Service rating of Baa3 to be investment grade.
Our six largest net counterparty positions represent approximately 99 percent of our net credit exposure. Under our marginless hedging agreements with key banks, neither party is required to provide collateral support related to hedging activities.
One of our senior officers is on the board of directors of NGL Energy Partners, LP ("NGL Energy"). In the normal course of business, we sell crude oil to NGL Energy. For the first six months of 2019, sales to NGL Energy were approximately 14 percent of our total consolidated revenues adjusted for loss on derivatives. In addition, a subsidiary of NGL Energy provides water disposal services for WPX that represent approximately 1 percent of operating expenses.
Other
Collateral support for our commodity agreements could include margin deposits, letters of credit, surety bonds and guarantees of payment by credit worthy parties.
Note 12. Subsequent Event
On August 5, 2019, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase up to $400 million of our outstanding shares over the next 24 months. Under the stock repurchase program, we may repurchase shares at management’s discretion in accordance with applicable securities laws, including through open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions or any combination thereof. The amount and timing of repurchases are subject to a number of factors, including stock price, trading volume, general market conditions, legal requirements, general business conditions and corporate considerations determined by WPX’s management, such as liquidity and capital needs. This stock repurchase program may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time by our Board of Directors.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the selected historical consolidated financial data and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The matters discussed below may contain forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless indicated otherwise, the following discussion relates to continuing operations. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of discontinued operations.
Overview
Composition of production (based on MBoe) and product revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
Overall quarter volumes increased 28 percent with oil leading the increase at 21 percent for the quarter. Our oil production as a percent of total production declined compared to 2018 due to Delaware production growth which has a higher natural gas component than our Williston production. The following table presents our production volumes and financial highlights for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Production Sales Volume Data(a):
|
|
|
Per day
|
|
|
|
Per day
|
|
|
|
Per day
|
|
|
|
Per day
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
8,905
|
|
97.9
|
|
7,352
|
|
80.8
|
|
17,552
|
|
97.0
|
|
13,271
|
|
73.3
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
18,736
|
|
205.9
|
|
13,854
|
|
152.2
|
|
36,947
|
|
204.1
|
|
25,763
|
|
142.3
|
NGLs (MBbls)
|
2,493
|
|
27.4
|
|
1,713
|
|
18.8
|
|
4,781
|
|
26.4
|
|
3,053
|
|
16.9
|
Combined equivalent volumes (MBoe)(b)
|
14,520
|
|
159.6
|
|
11,374
|
|
125.0
|
|
28,491
|
|
157.4
|
|
20,618
|
|
113.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Data (millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
695
|
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
$
|
804
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
Capital expenditure activity(c)
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
|
__________
(a)Excludes production from our discontinued operations.
(b)MBoe are calculated using the ratio of six Mcf to one barrel of oil.
(c)Includes capital expenditures activity related to discontinued operations of $1 million and $27 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.
Our second quarter 2019 operating results were $184 million favorable compared to second quarter 2018. The primary items impacting the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 include:
•$38 million increase in product revenues, primarily oil sales, of which $98 million related to higher production sales volumes offset by $55 million related to lower sales prices; and
•$232 million favorable change in net gain (loss) on derivatives.
Offset by:
•$81 million higher operating costs including depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease and facility, gathering, processing and transportation, and taxes other than income.
Our year-to-date 2019 operating results were $29 million favorable compared to year-to-date 2018. The primary items impacting the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 include:
•$138 million increase in product revenues, primarily oil sales, of which $267 million related to higher oil volumes, offset by $135 million related to lower oil prices; and
•$94 million favorable change in net gain (loss) on derivatives.
Offset by:
•$203 million higher operating costs including depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease and facility, gathering, processing and transportation, and taxes other than income.
Outlook
After our multi-year transformation of WPX, our oil-prone positions in the Delaware (Permian) and Williston Basins now form the foundation of WPX. Our acreage positions in each of these basins contains some of the top geology in the plays and in North America. Over the same period, we have also assembled an attractive infrastructure portfolio in the Permian which will help flow our production out of the basin and will create additional value either through monetization of our midstream investments or lower operating costs. In addition to our joint venture with Howard Energy Partners LLC, we made additional investments during 2018 in our equity positions in Whitewater and Oryx pipeline systems. In 2019, we closed on transactions and monetized the value in Whitewater and Oryx totaling approximately $500 million. Overall, we believe we are well positioned for prudent and disciplined growth assuming a constructive commodity price environment. For 2019, we currently expect our operating cash flows to exceed our base capital expenditures plan. However, the challenging and dynamic environment of oil and gas industry, along with future market conditions, may alter these expectations or plans. We would make appropriate adjustments to our plans if we foresee other-than-temporary changes in market conditions, including significant fluctuation in expected commodity prices.
Our expected base capital budget for full-year 2019 is $1.1 billion to $1.275 billion excluding land purchases. Planned capital for drilling and completions, including non-operated wells, is $1.050 billion to $1.175 billion for the full year 2019, with an additional $50 million to $100 million in midstream opportunities in the Delaware Basin.
Our June 30, 2019 liquidity totaled approximately $1.6 billion, reflecting amounts available under the Credit Facility Agreement and cash on hand. Our next Senior Note maturity of $529 million is not due until 2022. As of this filing, our Credit Facility Agreement is subject to a $2.1 billion borrowing base with aggregate elected commitments of $1.5 billion and a maturity date of April 17, 2023, subject to a springing maturity on October 15, 2021 (see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). We believe our current liquidity position will provide the necessary capital to develop our assets or should sustain us if there is a downturn.
As we execute on our long-term strategy, we continue to operate with a focus on increasing shareholder value and investing in our businesses in a way that enhances our competitive position by:
•value driven development of our positions in the Delaware and Williston Basins;
•continuing to pursue cost improvements and efficiency gains;
•employing new technology and operating methods;
•continuing to invest in projects to assess resources and add new development opportunities to our portfolio;
•retaining the flexibility to make adjustments to our planned levels and allocation of capital investment expenditures in response to changes in economic conditions or business opportunities; and
•continuing to maintain an active economic hedging program around our commodity price risks.
Potential risks or obstacles that could impact the execution of our plan include:
•lower than anticipated energy commodity prices;
•increase in the cost of, or shortages or delays in the availability of, drilling rigs and equipment supplies, skilled labor or transportation;
•higher capital costs of developing our properties, including the impact of inflation;
•lower than expected levels of cash flow from operations;
•counterparty credit and performance risk;
•general economic, financial markets or industry downturn;
•unavailability of capital either under our revolver or access to capital markets;
•changes in the political and regulatory environments; and
•decreased drilling success.
We continue to address certain of these risks through utilization of commodity hedging strategies, disciplined investment strategies and maintaining adequate liquidity. In addition, we use master netting agreements and collateral requirements with our counterparties to reduce credit risk and liquidity requirements. Further, we continue to monitor the long-term market outlooks and forecasts for potential indicators of needed changes to our forecasted oil and natural gas prices. Commodity prices are volatile and prices for a barrel of oil ranged from over $100 per barrel to less than $30 per barrel over the past five years. Our forecasted price assumptions reflect a long-term view of pricing but also consider current prices and are consistent with pricing assumptions generally used in evaluating our drilling decisions and acquisition plans. If forecasted oil and natural gas prices were to decline, we would need to review the producing properties net book value for possible impairment. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these factors, we cannot predict when or if future impairment charges will be recorded. If impairments were required, the charges could be significant. The net book value of our proved properties is $5.8 billion. In addition, the net book value associated with unproved leasehold is approximately $1.7 billion and is primarily associated with our Delaware Basin properties. See our discussion of impairment of long-lived assets in our Critical Accounting Estimates discussion in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
Three Month-Over-Three Month Results of Operations
Revenue analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) $ Change
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) % Change
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales
|
$
|
511
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
9
|
%
|
Natural gas sales
|
16
|
|
16
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
Natural gas liquid sales
|
31
|
|
36
|
|
(5)
|
|
(14)
|
%
|
Total product revenues
|
558
|
|
520
|
|
38
|
|
7
|
%
|
Net gain (loss) on derivatives
|
78
|
|
(154)
|
|
232
|
|
NM
|
|
Commodity management
|
58
|
|
64
|
|
(6)
|
|
(9)
|
%
|
Other
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
NM
|
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
695
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
62
|
%
|
__________
NM: A percentage calculation is not meaningful due to change in signs, a zero-value denominator or a percentage change greater than 200.
Significant variances in the respective line items of revenues are comprised of the following:
•$43 million increase in oil sales reflects $98 million related to higher production sales volumes partially offset by $55 million related to lower sales prices for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. The increase in production sales volumes was driven by both our Delaware and Williston Basins. The Delaware Basin volumes were 46.5 MBbls per day compared to 39.1 MBbls per day for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Williston Basin volumes were 51.4 MBbls per day compared to 41.7 MBbls per day for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The following table reflects oil production prices, the price impact of our derivative settlements and volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales (per barrel)
|
57.42
|
|
$
|
63.63
|
Impact of net cash received (paid) related to settlement of derivatives (per barrel)(a)
|
(2.98)
|
|
(11.47)
|
Oil net price including derivative settlements (per barrel)
|
$
|
54.44
|
|
$
|
52.16
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production sales volumes (MBbls)
|
8,905
|
|
7,352
|
Per day oil production sales volumes (MBbls/d)
|
97.9
|
|
80.8
|
__________
(a) Included in net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
•Natural gas sales reflects $5 million related to higher production sales volumes offset by $5 million related to lower sales prices for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. The increased production primarily relates to the Delaware Basin. The Delaware Basin volumes were 170.9 Mmcf per day compared to 126.7 Mmcf per day for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The following table reflects natural gas production prices, the price impact of our derivative settlements and volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales (per Mcf)
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
Impact of net cash received (paid) related to settlement of derivatives (per Mcf)(a)
|
0.88
|
|
0.75
|
Natural gas net price including derivative settlements (per Mcf)
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas production sales volumes (MMcf)
|
18,736
|
|
13,854
|
Per day natural gas production sales volumes (MMcf/d)
|
205.9
|
|
152.2
|
__________
(a) Included in net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
•$5 million decrease in natural gas liquids sales primarily reflect $21 million related to lower sales price partially offset by $16 million related to higher production sales volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. The increased production primarily relates to the Delaware Basin. The Delaware Basin volumes were 21.7 MBbls per day compared to 14.2 MBbls per day for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The following table reflects NGL production prices, the price impact of our derivative settlements and volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL sales (per barrel)
|
$
|
12.21
|
|
$
|
20.94
|
Impact of net cash received (paid) related to settlement of derivatives (per barrel)(a)
|
—
|
|
(2.06)
|
NGL net price including derivative settlements (per barrel)
|
$
|
12.21
|
|
$
|
18.88
|
|
|
|
|
NGL production sales volumes (MBbls)
|
2,493
|
|
1,713
|
Per day NGL production sales volumes (MBbls/d)
|
27.4
|
|
18.8
|
__________
(a) Included in net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
•$232 million favorable change in net gain (loss) on derivatives primarily reflects favorable change in crude oil derivatives which was a result of gains in 2019 due to decreases in 2019 of forward commodity prices relative to our hedge positions as opposed to losses in 2018 due to increases in 2018 of forward commodity prices relative to our hedge positions at that time. Settlements to be paid on derivatives totaled $10 million and $78 million for three months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, respectively.
•$6 million decrease in commodity management revenues is primarily due to lower natural gas prices on downstream sales, as well as lower crude sales prices and sales volumes. These decreases are partially offset by higher natural gas sales volumes. Crude sales volumes in 2018 included crude purchases to fulfill certain sales commitments. The increase in 2019 natural gas volumes resulted from additional excess pipeline capacity in the Delaware Basin we utilized to purchase natural gas at depressed Delaware Basin pricing and transport to sales points outside the Basin. Related commodity management costs and expenses decreased $13 million and are discussed below.
Cost and operating expense and operating income (loss) analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) $ Change
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) % Change
|
|
|
Per Boe Expense
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
$
|
221
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
$
|
(24)
|
|
(12)
|
%
|
|
$15.24
|
|
$17.31
|
Lease and facility operating
|
94
|
|
59
|
|
(35)
|
|
(59)
|
%
|
|
$6.50
|
|
$5.20
|
Gathering, processing and transportation
|
40
|
|
20
|
|
(20)
|
|
(100)
|
%
|
|
$2.78
|
|
$1.79
|
Taxes other than income
|
43
|
|
41
|
|
(2)
|
|
(5)
|
%
|
|
$2.95
|
|
$3.67
|
Exploration
|
24
|
|
17
|
|
(7)
|
|
(41)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
40
|
|
34
|
|
(6)
|
|
(18)
|
%
|
|
$2.73
|
|
$3.06
|
Equity-based compensation
|
8
|
|
10
|
|
2
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$0.56
|
|
$0.83
|
Total general and administrative
|
48
|
|
44
|
|
(4)
|
|
(9)
|
%
|
|
$3.29
|
|
$3.89
|
Commodity management
|
41
|
|
54
|
|
13
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other—net
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
(2)
|
|
(200)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
$
|
514
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
$
|
(81)
|
|
(19)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
181
|
|
$
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
NM: A percentage calculation is not meaningful due to change in signs, a zero-value denominator or a percentage change greater than 200.
Significant variances in our costs and expenses are comprised of the following:
•$24 million increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization is primarily due to higher production volumes partially offset by a $2.07 per Boe decrease in rate which was impacted by higher estimated proved reserves as compared to June 30, 2018 primarily due to a higher 12-month average price and favorable technical revisions in the Willistion Basin. The decrease in rate was also a result of the addition of new wells in the Williston Basin with lower relative cost per Boe.
•$35 million increase in lease and facility operating expenses primarily related to increased production volumes and higher water management costs.
•$20 million increase in gathering, processing and transportation primarily due to growth in production volumes and the impact of new or modified contracts in the Delaware and Williston Basins.
•$7 million increase in exploration expense relates to higher unproved leasehold amortization in 2019.
•$13 million decrease in commodity management expenses is primarily due to depressed Delaware Basin pricing on physical natural gas cost of sales and lower crude oil purchase volumes. These decreases were partially offset by higher natural gas purchase volumes as discussed above.
Results below operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) $ Change
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) % Change
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
181
|
|
$
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
NM
|
|
Interest expense
|
(40)
|
|
(39)
|
|
(1)
|
|
(3)
|
%
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
(71)
|
|
71
|
|
100
|
%
|
Gain on equity method investment transaction
|
247
|
|
—
|
|
247
|
|
NM
|
|
Investment income and other
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes
|
389
|
|
(112)
|
|
501
|
|
NM
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
84
|
|
(33)
|
|
(117)
|
|
NM
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
305
|
|
(79)
|
|
384
|
|
NM
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
(2)
|
|
2
|
|
100
|
%
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
305
|
|
$
|
(81)
|
|
386
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
NM: A percentage calculation is not meaningful due to change in signs, a zero-value denominator or a percentage change greater than 200.
In the second-quarter of 2018, we used proceeds form the San Juan Gallup disposition and proceeds from the issuance of $500 million Senior Notes due in 2026 to retire $921 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes. As a result of the early retirement of these Senior Notes, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $71 million in second-quarter 2018.
During the second quarter of 2019, we recorded a gain related to our equity method investment in the Oryx pipeline. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for detail of this transaction.
Provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to benefit for income taxes for the same period for 2018. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the effective tax rates compared to the federal statutory rate for both periods.
Six Month-Over-Six Month Results of Operations
Revenue analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) $ Change
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) % Change
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales
|
$
|
960
|
|
$
|
828
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
16
|
%
|
Natural gas sales
|
41
|
|
33
|
|
8
|
|
24
|
%
|
Natural gas liquid sales
|
64
|
|
66
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
%
|
Total product revenues
|
1,065
|
|
927
|
|
138
|
|
15
|
%
|
Net loss on derivatives
|
(129)
|
|
(223)
|
|
94
|
|
42
|
%
|
Commodity management
|
117
|
|
100
|
|
17
|
|
17
|
%
|
Other
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
NM
|
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
$
|
804
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
31
|
%
|
__________
NM: A percentage calculation is not meaningful due to change in signs, a zero-value denominator or a percentage change greater than 200.
Significant variances in the respective line items of revenues are comprised of the following:
•$132 million increase in oil sales reflects $267 million related to higher production sales volumes offset by $135 million related to lower sales prices for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. The Delaware Basin volumes were 45.4 MBbls per day compared to 36.5 MBbls per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Williston Basin volumes were 51.6 MBbls per day compared to 36.8 MBbls per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The following table reflects oil production prices, the price impact of our derivative settlements and volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales (per barrel)
|
$
|
54.71
|
|
$
|
62.42
|
Impact of net cash received (paid) related to settlement of derivatives (per barrel)(a)
|
(1.50)
|
|
(10.78)
|
Oil net price including derivative settlements (per barrel)
|
$
|
53.21
|
|
$
|
51.64
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production sales volumes (MBbls)
|
17,552
|
|
13,271
|
Per day oil production sales volumes (MBbls/d)
|
97.0
|
|
73.3
|
__________
(a) Included in net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
•$8 million increase in natural gas sales reflects $14 million in higher production sales volumes partially offset by $6 million related to lower sales prices for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. The increase in our production sales volumes primarily relates to our Delaware Basin which had production volumes of 168.7 MMcf per day compared to 119.0 MMcf per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018, respectively. The following table reflects natural gas production prices, the price impact of our derivative settlements and volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales (per Mcf)
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
Impact of net cash received (paid) related to settlement of derivatives (per Mcf)(a)
|
0.65
|
|
0.58
|
Natural gas net price including derivative settlements (per Mcf)
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas production sales volumes (MMcf)
|
36,947
|
|
25,763
|
Per day natural gas production sales volumes (MMcf/d)
|
204.1
|
|
142.3
|
__________
(a) Included in net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
•$2 million decrease in natural gas liquids sales primarily reflects $39 million related to lower sales prices offset by $37 million related to higher production sales volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. The primary increase in natural gas liquids production volumes was in the Delaware Basin, the volumes were 20.8 MBbls per day compared to 12.6 MBbls per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The following table reflects NGL production prices, the price impact of our derivative settlements and volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL sales (per barrel)
|
$
|
13.29
|
|
$
|
21.47
|
Impact of net cash received (paid) related to settlement of derivatives (per barrel)(a)
|
—
|
|
(1.46)
|
NGL net price including derivative settlements (per barrel)
|
$
|
13.29
|
|
$
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
|
NGL production sales volumes (MBbls)
|
4,781
|
|
3,053
|
Per day NGL production sales volumes (MBbls/d)
|
26.4
|
|
16.9
|
__________
(a) Included in net gain (loss) on derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
•$94 million favorable change in net gain (loss) on derivatives primarily reflects favorable change in crude oil derivatives which was a result of gains in 2019 due to decreases in 2019 of forward commodity prices relative to our hedge positions as opposed to losses in 2018 due to increases in 2018 of forward commodity prices relative to our hedge position at that time. Settlements to be paid on derivatives totaled $1 million and $133 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
•$17 million increase in commodity management revenues primarily due to higher natural gas sales volumes. The increase in 2019 natural gas volumes resulted from additional excess pipeline capacity in the Delaware Basin we utilized to purchase natural gas at depressed Delaware Basin pricing and transport to sales points outside the Basin. Related commodity management costs and expenses decreased $3 million and are discussed below.
Cost and operating expense and operating income (loss) analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) $ Change
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) % Change
|
|
|
Per Boe Expense
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
$
|
440
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
$
|
(82)
|
|
(23)
|
%
|
|
$15.46
|
|
$17.34
|
Lease and facility operating
|
180
|
|
114
|
|
(66)
|
|
(58)
|
%
|
|
$6.32
|
|
$5.55
|
Gathering, processing and transportation
|
82
|
|
38
|
|
(44)
|
|
(116)
|
%
|
|
$2.88
|
|
$1.85
|
Taxes other than income
|
82
|
|
71
|
|
(11)
|
|
(15)
|
%
|
|
$2.87
|
|
$3.46
|
Exploration
|
48
|
|
36
|
|
(12)
|
|
(33)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
79
|
|
70
|
|
(9)
|
|
(13)
|
%
|
|
$2.77
|
|
$3.41
|
Equity-based compensation
|
16
|
|
17
|
|
1
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
$0.56
|
|
$0.82
|
Total general and administrative
|
95
|
|
87
|
|
(8)
|
|
(9)
|
%
|
|
$3.33
|
|
$4.23
|
Commodity management
|
90
|
|
93
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other—net
|
5
|
|
4
|
|
(1)
|
|
(25)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
$
|
(221)
|
|
(28)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$
|
32
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
NM: A percentage calculation is not meaningful due to change in signs, a zero-value denominator or a percentage change greater than 200.
Significant variances in our costs and expenses are comprised of the following:
•$82 million increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization is primarily due to higher production volumes partially offset by a $1.88 per Boe decrease in rate which was impacted by higher estimated reserves as compared to June 30, 2018 due to a higher 12-month average price and favorable technical revisions in the Williston Basin. The decrease in rate was also a result of the addition of new wells with lower relative cost per Boe.
•$66 million increase in lease and facility operating expenses primarily related to increased production volumes and higher water management costs.
•$44 million increase in gathering, processing and transportation is due to growth in production volumes and the impact of new or modified contracts in the Delaware and Williston Basins.
•$11 million increase in taxes other than income related to increased product revenues, previously discussed.
•$12 million increase in exploration expense relates to higher unproved leasehold amortization in 2019.
•$8 million increase in general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 2018. Our general and administrative expenses per BOE decreased to an average $3.33 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $4.23 for the same period in 2018.
•$3 million decrease in commodity management expenses is primarily due to depressed Delaware Basin pricing on physical natural gas cost of sales and lower average prices for crude oil. These decreases are substantially offset by higher natural gas purchase volumes as discussed above.
Results below operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) $ Change
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) % Change
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$
|
32
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
NM
|
|
Interest expense
|
(81)
|
|
(85)
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
%
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
(71)
|
|
71
|
|
100
|
%
|
Gains on equity method investment transactions
|
373
|
|
—
|
|
373
|
|
NM
|
|
Investment income (loss) and other
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
NM
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
327
|
|
(153)
|
|
480
|
|
NM
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
70
|
|
(48)
|
|
(118)
|
|
NM
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
257
|
|
(105)
|
|
362
|
|
NM
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
(91)
|
|
91
|
|
100
|
%
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
257
|
|
$
|
(196)
|
|
453
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
NM: A percentage calculation is not meaningful due to change in signs, a zero-value denominator or a percentage change greater than 200.
The decrease in interest expense primarily relates to lower level of debt outstanding in 2019 compared to 2018.
In the second-quarter of 2018, we used proceeds form the San Juan Gallup disposition and proceeds from the issuance of $500 million Senior Notes due in 2026 to retire $921 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes. As a result of the early retirement of these Senior Notes, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $71 million in second-quarter 2018.
Gains on equity method investment transactions in 2019 related to the sales of our equity interest in the Whitewater natural gas pipeline and a distribution received related to our 25 percent equity interest in the Oryx pipeline. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details of these sales.
Provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to benefit for income taxes for the same period for 2018. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the effective tax rates compared to the federal statutory rate for 2019 and 2018.
Loss from discontinued operations in 2018 included a $147 million pretax loss on the sale of our San Juan Gallup operations which was sold in the first quarter of 2018. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for detail of amounts included in discontinued operations.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Liquidity
Overview and Liquidity
We expect our capital structure will provide us financial flexibility to meet our requirements for working capital and capital expenditures while maintaining a sufficient level of liquidity. Our primary sources of liquidity in 2019 are cash on hand, expected cash flows from operations, anticipated proceeds from the sales of non-core assets, and, if necessary, borrowings on our credit facility. We anticipate that the combination of these sources should be sufficient to allow us to pursue our business strategy and goals through at least 2019. Additional sources of liquidity, if needed and if available, include proceeds from asset sales, bank financings and proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and equity securities.
We note the following assumptions for 2019 capital expenditures:
•our planned capital expenditures for full-year 2019, excluding acquisitions, are estimated to be approximately $1.1 billion to $1.275 billion of which $1.050 billion to $1.175 billion relates to drilling and completions, including facilities. As of June 30, 2019, we have incurred $587 million of drilling and completion capital expenditures including facilities; and
•we have hedged a portion of our anticipated 2019 oil and gas production as disclosed in Commodity Price Risk Management following this section.
Potential risks associated with our planned levels of liquidity and the planned capital and investment expenditures discussed above include:
•lower than expected levels of cash flow from operations, primarily resulting from lower energy commodity prices or inflation on operating costs;
•lower than anticipated proceeds from asset sales;
•significantly lower than expected capital expenditures could result in the loss of undeveloped leasehold;
•reduced access to our credit facility pursuant to our financial covenants; and
•higher than expected development costs, including the impact of inflation.
Credit Facility
Our Credit Facility, as amended, includes total commitments of $1.5 billion on a $2.1 billion Borrowing Base with a maturity date of April 17, 2023, subject to a springing maturity on October 15, 2021 if available liquidity minus outstanding 2022 notes is less than $500 million (see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on our current credit ratings, a Collateral Trigger Period applies which makes the Credit Facility subject to certain financial covenants and a Borrowing Base. The Credit Facility may be used for working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The financial covenants in the Credit Facility may limit our ability to borrow money, depending on the applicable financial metrics at any given time. For additional information regarding the terms of our Credit Facility see Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of June 30, 2019, WPX had no borrowings outstanding and $42 million of letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility and we were in compliance with our covenants under the credit agreement. Our unused borrowing availability was $1,458 million as of June 30, 2019. As of the date of this filing, we are in compliance with all terms, conditions and financial covenants of the Credit Facility, as amended.
Commodity Price Risk Management
To manage the commodity price risk and volatility of owning producing oil and gas properties, we enter into derivative contracts for a portion of our future production (see Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). We chose not to designate our derivative contracts associated with our future production as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The following table sets forth, as of the date of this filing, the derivative notional volumes of the net (long) short positions for the remainder of 2019 and 2020 that are economic hedges of our production volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
Volume
(Bbls/d)
|
|
Weighted Average
Price ($/Bbl)
|
|
Volume
(Bbls/d)
|
|
Weighted Average
Price ($/Bbl)
|
Fixed Price Swaps—WTI(a)
|
60,500
|
|
$
|
55.29
|
|
40,000
|
|
$
|
57.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Price Calls—WTI
|
5,000
|
|
$
|
54.08
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Fixed Price Costless Collars—WTI
|
8,000
|
|
$50.00 - $60.19
|
|
20,000
|
|
$53.33 - $63.48
|
Basis swaps—Midland/Cushing
|
22,000
|
|
$
|
(1.37)
|
|
7,486
|
|
$
|
(1.31)
|
Basis swaps—Nymex Calendar Monthly Avg Roll
|
16,630
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Basis swaps—Magellan East Houston
|
1,663
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
|
Basis swaps—Magellan East Houston/Midland
|
5,652
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Basis swaps—Argus LLS/Midland
|
1,663
|
|
$
|
8.60
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Basis swaps—Magellan East Houston/Argus LLS
|
1,663
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Basis swaps—Clearbrook
|
8,000
|
|
$
|
(3.23)
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Basis swaps—Brent/WTI Spread
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
5,000
|
|
$
|
8.36
|
__________
(a)Average notional volumes for 2019 are 53,000 Bbls/day for third quarter and 68,000 Bbls/day for fourth quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
Jul - Dec 2019
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
Volume
(BBtu/d)
|
|
Weighted Average
Price ($/MMBtu)
|
|
Volume
(BBtu/d)
|
|
Weighted Average
Price ($/MMBtu)
|
Fixed Price Swaps—Henry Hub
|
110
|
|
$
|
3.07
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis swaps—Permian
|
25
|
|
$
|
(0.39)
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis swaps—Waha
|
15
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
60
|
|
$
|
(0.79)
|
Basis swaps—Houston Ship Channel
|
30
|
|
$
|
(0.09)
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources (Uses) of Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
$
|
634
|
|
$
|
428
|
Investing activities
|
(195)
|
|
3
|
Financing activities
|
(330)
|
|
(516)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
(85)
|
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to higher production volumes in 2019 and realizations on our derivatives, partially offset by higher operating costs and lower commodity prices. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 also includes the receipt of approximately $38 million related to an AMT credit refund which represents approximately half of our AMT credit carryforwards. Excluding changes in working capital, total cash provided by operating activities related to discontinued operations was approximately $45 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. In addition, cash outflows related to Powder River Basin gathering and transportation contracts retained by WPX were $15 million and $28 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Investing activities
The table below includes cash and incurred capital expenditures for drilling and completions and capital expenditures excluding facilities for land acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash capital expenditures for drilling and completions:
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
588
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
—
|
|
25
|
Total
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures incurred for drilling and completions:
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
$
|
624
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
—
|
|
23
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land acquisitions
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
$
|
10
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 includes the proceeds from the sale of certain non-core properties and proceeds related to transactions involving our equity method investments including our 20 percent equity interest in Whitewater natural gas pipeline and our 25 percent equity interest in the Oryx pipeline (see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 includes $648 million of net proceeds from the sale of San Juan Gallup (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Financing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 includes payment for shares withheld for taxes of $15 million and $12 million, respectively.
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 includes $986 million of payments for retirement of long-term debt, including approximately $63 million of premium partially offset by $494 million net proceeds from a debt issuance in the second quarter of 2018.
Contractual Obligations
See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of additional transportation commitments.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
We had no guarantees of off-balance sheet debt to third parties or any other off-balance sheet arrangements at June 30, 2019 or at December 31, 2018. Although not a financing arrangement, we have provided a guarantee for certain obligations transferred as part of a divestment.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Our current interest rate risk exposure is primarily related to our debt portfolio and has not materially changed during the first six months of 2019.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to the impact of fluctuations in the market price of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids as well as other market factors, such as market volatility and energy commodity price correlations. We are exposed to these risks in connection with our owned energy-related assets, our long-term energy-related contracts and our marketing trading activities. We manage the risks associated with these market fluctuations using various derivatives and nonderivative energy-related contracts. The fair value of derivative contracts is subject to many factors, including changes in energy commodity market prices, the liquidity and volatility of the markets in which the contracts are transacted and changes in interest rates. See Notes 10 and 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
An assumed increase in the forward prices used in the valuation of our crude oil and natural gas fixed price swap and option derivatives of $5.00 per Bbl and $0.25 per MMBtu would decrease our derivative valuation by approximately $125 million and $82 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Conversely, an assumed decrease in forward prices of $5.00 per Bbl and $0.25 per MMBtu would increase our derivative valuation by $122 and $81 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. However, any cash derivative gain or loss would be substantially offset by a decrease or increase, respectively, in the actual sales value of production economically hedged by the derivative instruments. Contracts designated as normal purchases or sales and nonderivative energy contracts have been excluded from this sensitivity analysis.
We have previously disclosed the value-at-risk; however, a sensitivity analysis is predominately the disclosure used by our peers. The value-at-risk information below is included for comparative purposes to our 2018 Form 10-K disclosures.
Our portfolio consists of derivative contracts that hedge or could potentially hedge the price risk exposure from our energy commodity purchases and sales. The fair value of our derivatives not designated as hedging instruments was a net asset of $14 million and $141 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
The value at risk for derivative contracts held for nontrading purposes was $33 million at June 30, 2019 and $26 million at December 31, 2018. During the last 12 months, our value at risk for these contracts ranged from a high of $42 million to a low of $26 million. See Item 7A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for additional discussion regarding our value at risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act) (“Disclosure Controls”) or our internal control over financial reporting (“Internal Controls”) will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We monitor our Disclosure
Controls and Internal Controls and make modifications as necessary; our intent in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls will be modified as systems change and conditions warrant.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Disclosure Controls was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these Disclosure Controls are effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the first half of 2019, we implemented a major portion of a new enterprise resource planning ("ERP") accounting and reporting system in order to upgrade our technology and improve the timeliness and processing of our financial and operational information. The overall implementation will be ongoing throughout 2019 and will be substantially complete by December 31, 2019. Although the ERP functions as an integral part of our processes and system of internal controls, we concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, there have been no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.