Item 1. Financial Statements.

GLOBAL NET LEASE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Organization

Global Net Lease, Inc. (the "Company"), which incorporated on July 13, 2011 , is a Maryland corporation that elected and qualified to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for United States ("U.S.") federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2013. On June 2, 2015 (the "Listing Date"), the Company listed shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share ("Common Stock") on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "GNL" (the "Listing"). The Company invests in commercial properties, with an emphasis on sale-leaseback transactions involving single tenant net-leased commercial properties.

The Company and American Realty Capital Global Trust II, Inc. ("Global II"), an entity formerly sponsored by an affiliate of AR Capital Global Holdings, LLC, the Company's sponsor (the “Sponsor”), entered into an agreement and plan of merger on August 8, 2016 (the "Merger Agreement"). The Company and Global II each are, or were sponsored, directly or indirectly, by the Sponsor. The Sponsor and its affiliates provide or provided asset management services to the Company and Global II pursuant to advisory agreements. On December 22, 2016 (the "Merger Date"), pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Global II merged with and into Mayflower Acquisition LLC (the "Merger Sub"), a Maryland limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, at which time the separate existence of Global II ceased and the Company became the parent of the Merger Sub (the "Merger").

In addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, American Realty Capital Global II Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and the operating partnership of Global II (the "Global II OP"), merged with Global Net Lease Operating Partnership, L.P. (the "OP"), a Delaware limited partnership, with the OP being the surviving entity (the "Partnership Merger" and together with the Merger, the "Mergers"). As a result of the Mergers, the Company acquired the business of Global II, which immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, owned a portfolio of commercial properties, including single tenant net-leased commercial properties two of which were located in the U.S., three of which were located in the United Kingdom, and 10 of which were located in continental Europe (see Note 3 — Merger Transaction ).

As of September 30, 2017 , the Company owned 313 properties consisting of 22.3 million rentable square feet, which were 99.4% leased, with a weighted average remaining lease term of 9.1 years. Based on original purchase price or acquisition value with respect to properties acquired in the Mergers, 50.4% of the Company's properties are located in Europe and 49.6% of the Company's properties are located in the U.S. and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Company may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity or securitized loans secured by real estate. As of September 30, 2017 , the Company did not own any first mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity or securitized loans.

Substantially all of the Company's business is conducted through the OP. The Company has retained Global Net Lease Advisors, LLC (the "Advisor") to manage the Company's affairs on a day-to-day basis. The properties are managed and leased by Global Net Lease Properties, LLC (the "Property Manager"). The Advisor, Property Manager, and Global Net Lease Special Limited Partner, LLC (the "Special Limited Partner") are under common control with AR Global Investments, LLC (the successor business to AR Capital, LLC (the "Former Parent of the Sponsor"), "AR Global"), the parent of the Company's Sponsor, as a result of which they are related parties. These related parties receive compensation and fees for various services provided to the Company. The Advisor has entered into a service provider agreement with Moor Park Capital Partners LLP (the "Service Provider"), pursuant to which the Service Provider provides, subject to the Advisor's oversight, certain real estate related services, as well as sourcing and structuring of investment opportunities, performance of due diligence, and arranging debt financing and equity investment syndicates, solely with respect to investments in Europe.

On February 28, 2017 , the Company completed a reverse stock split of Common Stock, limited partnership units in the OP ("OP Units") and long term incentive plan units in the OP ("LTIP Units"), at a ratio of 1 -for- 3 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). No OP Units were issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split and the Company repurchased any fractional shares of Common Stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split for cash. No payments were made in respect of any fractional OP Units. The Reverse Stock Split was applied to all of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and therefore did not affect any stockholder’s relative ownership percentage. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock was reduced from 198.8 million to 66.3 million .

Effective May 24, 2017, following approval by the Company's board of directors, the Company filed an amendment to the Company's charter with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation, to decrease the total number of shares that the Company has authority to issue from 350.0 million to 116.7 million shares, of which (i) 100.0 million is designated as Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share; and (ii) 16.7 million is designated as preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share.

All references made to share or per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and applicable disclosures have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this Reverse Stock Split.

On September 7, 2017 , the Company and the OP, entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with BMO Capital Markets Corp. and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as representatives of the underwriters listed on Schedule I thereto pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s new class of 7.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), in an underwritten public offering at a public offering price equal to the liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company also granted the underwriters a 30 -day option to purchase up to an additional 600,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. On September 12, 2017, the Company completed the initial issuance and sale of 4,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which generated gross proceeds of $100.0 million and net proceeds of $96.3 million , after deducting underwriting discounts and offering costs paid by the Company. On October 11, 2017, the underwriters exercised an option to purchase additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and the Company sold an additional 259,650 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which generated gross proceeds of $6.5 million after adjusting for the amount of dividends declared per share for the period from September 12, 2017 to September 30, 2017 and payable to holders of record as of October 6, 2017, and resulted in net proceeds of $6.3 million , after deducting underwriting discounts and offering costs paid by the Company.

The Company has entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with UBS Securities LLC, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Capital One Securities, Inc., Mizuho Securities USA Inc., FBR Capital Markets & Co. and KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. (together, the “Agents”) to sell shares of Common Stock, to raise aggregate sales proceeds of $175.0 million , from time to time, pursuant to an “at the market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”). Common Stock issued under the ATM Program is registered pursuant to the Company's shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-214579 ). During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Company sold 0.8 million shares of Common Stock through the ATM Program for net sales proceeds of $18.5 million .

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.

These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 , which are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on February 28, 2017 . There have been no significant changes to the Company's significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , other than the updates described below and the subsequent notes.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the OP and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. In determining whether the Company has a controlling financial interest in a joint venture and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, management considers factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions and contractual and substantive participating rights of the other partners or members as well as whether the entity is a variable interest entity ("VIE") for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company has determined that the OP is a VIE of which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Substantially all of the Company's assets and liabilities are held by the OP.

Income Taxes

The Company qualified to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2013. Commencing with such taxable year, the Company was organized to operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code. The Company intends to continue to operate in such a manner to continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, but no assurance can be given that it will operate in a manner so as to remain qualified as a REIT. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent it distributes annually all of its REIT taxable income. REIT's are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. The Company conducts business in various states and municipalities within the U.S. (including Puerto Rico), United Kingdom and continental Europe and, as a result, the Company or one of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and certain foreign jurisdictions. As a result, the Company may be subject to certain federal, state, local and foreign taxes on its income and assets, including alternative minimum taxes, taxes on any undistributed income and state, local or foreign income, franchise, property and transfer taxes. Any of these taxes decrease Company's earnings and available cash.

In addition, the Company's international assets and operations, including those designated as direct or indirect qualified REIT subsidiaries or other disregarded entities of a REIT, continue to be subject to taxation in the foreign jurisdictions where those assets are held or those operations are conducted. During the period from July 13, 2011 (date of inception) to December 31, 2012, the Company elected to be taxed as a corporation, pursuant to which income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and income tax basis of assets and liabilities and the expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, using expected tax rates in effect for each taxing jurisdiction in which the Company operates for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more-likely-than-not, based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Because, the Company elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2013, it does not anticipate that any applicable deferred tax assets or liabilities will be realized.

Significant judgment is required in determining the Company's tax provision and in evaluating its tax positions. The Company establishes tax reserves based on a benefit recognition model, which the Company believes could result in a greater amount of benefit (and a lower amount of reserve) being initially recognized in certain circumstances. Provided that the tax position is deemed more likely than not of being sustained, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being ultimately realized upon settlement. The Company derecognizes the tax position when the likelihood of the tax position being sustained is no longer more likely than not.

The Company recognizes deferred income taxes in certain of its subsidiaries taxable in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions. Deferred income taxes are generally the result of temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for GAAP purposes). In addition, deferred tax assets arise from unutilized tax net operating losses, generated in prior years. The Company provides a valuation allowance against its deferred income tax assets when it believes that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Whenever a change in circumstances causes a change in the estimated realizability of the related deferred income tax asset, the resulting increase or decrease in the valuation allowance is included in deferred income tax expense (benefit).

The Company derives most of its REIT taxable income from its real estate operations in the U.S. and has historically distributed all of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders. As such, the Company's real estate operations are generally not subject to federal tax, and accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes in the consolidated financial statements for these operations. These operations may be subject to certain state, local, and foreign taxes, as applicable.

The Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are primarily the result of temporary differences related to the following:

The Company recognizes current income tax expense for state and local income taxes and taxes incurred in its foreign jurisdictions. The Company's current income tax expense fluctuates from period to period based primarily on the timing of its taxable income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Company recognized an income tax expense of $0.8 million and $2.2 million , respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the Company recognized an income tax expense of $0.4 million and $1.4 million , respectively. Deferred income tax (expense) benefit is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences and the utilization of net operating losses generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets from state and local taxes in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions.

Out-of-period adjustment

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Company recorded $0.5 million of additional rental income and unbilled straight-line rent due to an error in the calculation of straight-line rent for one of the Company's properties acquired during 2014. The Company concluded that this adjustment was not material to the financial position or results of operations for the current period or any prior period.

Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement

Concurrent with the Listing and modifications to the Fourth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (the "Advisory Agreement") by and among the Company, the OP and the Advisor, the Company entered into a Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement (the “OPP”) with the OP and the Advisor (see Note 13 — Share-Based Compensation ). The Company records equity based compensation expense associated with the awards over the requisite service period of five years . The cumulative equity-based compensation expense is adjusted each reporting period for changes in the estimated market-related performance.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted:

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) , Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships . Under the new guidance, the novation of a derivative contract in a hedge accounting relationship does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedge accounting relationship. The hedge accounting relationship could continue uninterrupted if all of the other hedge accounting criteria are met, including the expectation that the hedge will be highly effective when the creditworthiness of the new counterparty to the derivative contract is considered. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2017, and has applied the provisions prospectively. The adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued an update on ASU 2016-09 Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The guidance changes the accounting for certain aspects of share-based compensation. Among other things, the revised guidance allows companies to make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. The revised guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2017, and has applied the provisions prospectively. The adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17 Interest Held through Related Parties that Are under Common Control (Topic 810) guidance where a reporting entity will need to evaluate if it should consolidate a VIE. The amendments change the evaluation of whether a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE by changing how a single decision maker of a VIE treats indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity. The revised guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2017, and has applied the provisions prospectively. The adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01 Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805) guidance that revises the definition of a business. Amongst other things, this new guidance is applicable when evaluating whether an acquisition (disposal) should be treated as either a business acquisition (disposal) or an asset acquisition (disposal). Under the revised guidance, when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset or group of similar assets, the assets acquired would not be considered a business. The revised guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and the amendments will be applied prospectively. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2017, and has applied the provisions prospectively. While the Company's acquisitions have historically been classified as either business combinations or asset acquisitions, certain acquisitions that were classified as business combinations by the Company likely would have been considered asset acquisitions under the new standard. As a result, future transaction costs are more likely to be capitalized since the Company expects most of its future acquisitions to be classified as asset acquisitions under this new standard. All four of the Company's acquisitions during 2017 have been classified as asset acquisitions.

Pending Adoption:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update (“ASU 2014-09”) establishing Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. Under ASC 606, an entity is required to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in ASC 606 using either a modified retrospective approach, by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption or a full retrospective approach. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and currently expects to utilize the modified retrospective approach upon adoption and does not expect that this will result in a significant cumulative-effect adjustment to equity.

The Company has progressed in its project plan in evaluating our various revenue streams in order to identify any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition under ASC 606 and ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”). Based on the Company’s evaluation of its various revenue streams, the Company believes that gains on sales of real estate could be affected by adoption of ASC 606. The Company expects that this standard could have an impact on the timing of gains on certain sales of real estate as a result of more transactions generally qualifying as sales of real estate and revenue being recognized at an earlier date than under current accounting guidance. Specifically, the Company expects that this would impact partial sales of real estate in situations where the Company no longer retains a controlling financial interest. If the Company were to enter into partial sales of real estate, the Company would derecognize the real estate asset consistent with the principles outlined in ASC 606 and any retained non-controlling ownership interest would be measured at fair value consistent with the guidance on noncash consideration in ASC 606.

The Company is continuing to evaluate any differences in the timing, measurement, or presentation of revenue recognition and the impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and internal accounting processes resulting from ASC 606 as well as ASC Topic 842, Leases as discussed below.

In February 2016, the FASB issued an update ASU 2016-02 establishing ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. ASC 842 supersedes previous leasing standards and is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. ASC 842 will impact the lease accounting model for both lessees and lessors. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019.

The Company is a lessee for some properties in which it has ground leases as of September 30, 2017. For these leases, the Company will be required to record a right-of-use asset and lease liability equal to the present value of the remaining lease payments upon adoption of this update. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual lease classification approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today.

From a lessor perspective the Company expects that the new standard will impact the presentation of lease and non-lease components of revenue such as rent, and operating expense reimbursements including common area maintenance, taxes, and insurance from leases for which the Company is a lessor. The Company does not expect this guidance to impact its existing lessor revenue recognition pattern. The Company anticipates that it will elect the following practical expedients, which must be elected

as a package and applied consistently by an entity to all of its leases, which allow the Company to not have to reassess the following upon adoption: (i) whether any expired or existing contract contains a lease, (ii) lease classification related to expired or existing leases, or (iii) whether costs incurred on existing leases qualify as initial direct costs. The Company is continuing to evaluate any differences in the timing, measurement, or presentation of lessor revenues as well as the impact of the new lessee accounting model on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). The revised guidance amends the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The new guidance significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to equity investments and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. Among other things, it also amends the presentation and disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company expects that there will be no impact from this adoption to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) guidance on how certain transactions should be classified and presented in the statement of cash flows as either operating, investing or financing activities. Among other things, the update provides specific guidance on where to classify debt prepayment and extinguishment costs, payments for contingent consideration made after a business combination and distributions received from equity method investments. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company expects that there will be no impact from this adoption to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (Topic 230) guidance on the classification of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The amendment requires restricted cash to be included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total cash amounts. Therefore, transfers between cash and restricted cash will no longer be shown on the statement of cash flows. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018, using a retrospective transition method. As a result, the Company will restate its statements of cash flows for all periods presented to include restricted cash in the beginning and ending cash balances and remove all transfers between cash and restricted cash from operating, investing and financing activities.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) guidance on simplifying subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this update modify the concept of impairment from the condition that exists to when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. An entity no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The revised guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and the amendments will be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05 Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets guidance related to partial sales of non-financial assets, eliminates rules specifically addressing the sales of real estate, clarifies the definition of in substance non-financial assets, removes exception to the financial asset derecognition model and clarifies the accounting for contributions of non-financial assets to joint ventures. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company expects that any future sales of real estate in which the Company retains a non-controlling interest in the property would result in the full gain amount being recognized at the time of the partial sale. Historically, the Company has not retained any interest in properties it has sold.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) guidance that clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The update states that modification accounting should be used unless the fair value of the award, the vesting terms of the award, and the classification of the award as either equity or liability, all do not change as a result of the modification. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company expects that any future modifications to the Company's issued share-based awards will be accounted for using modification accounting, unless the modification meets all of the exception criteria noted above. As a result, the modification would be treated as an exchange of the original award for a new award, with any incremental fair value being treated as additional compensation cost.

I n July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11 Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) : (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception guidance that changes the method to determine the classification of certain financial instruments with a down round feature as liabilities or equity instruments and clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. A down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability, rather, an entity that presents earnings per share is required to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features. The revised guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Adoption should be applied retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down round feature with a cumulative-effect adjustment to the statement of financial position. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities . The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The transition guidance provides companies with the option of early adopting the new standard using a modified retrospective transition method in any interim period after issuance of the update, or alternatively requires adoption for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. This adoption method will require the Company to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that the Company adopts the update. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, the Company currently expects adoption to have an immaterial impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 —  Merger Transaction

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of Global II's common stock, including restricted shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Global II Common Stock"), other than shares owned by the Company, any subsidiary of the Company or any wholly owned subsidiary of Global II, was converted into the right to receive 2.27 shares of Common Stock (such consideration, the “Stock Merger Consideration”), and each outstanding unit of limited partnership interest and Class B interest of Global II OP (collectively, “Global II OP Units”) was converted into the right to receive 2.27 shares of Common Stock (the “Partnership Merger Consideration” and, together with the Stock Merger Consideration, the “Merger Consideration”), in each case with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares.

In addition, as provided in the Merger Agreement, all outstanding restricted shares of common stock of Global II became fully vested and entitled to receive the Merger Consideration.

The Company issued 9.6 million shares of its Common Stock as consideration in the Merger. Based upon the closing price of the shares of Common Stock of $23.10 on December 21, 2016 , as reported on the NYSE, and the number of shares of Global II Common Stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares of common stock and OP Units, net of any fractional shares on December 21, 2016 , the aggregate fair value of the Merger Consideration paid to former holders of Global II Common Stock and former holders of units of Global II OP Units was $220.9 million .

On December 22, 2016, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Global II merged with and into the Merger Sub. In addition, Global II OP, merged with the OP (see Note 1 — Organization for details). The fair value of the consideration transferred for the Mergers totaled $220.9 million and consisted of the following:

Accounting Treatment of the Mergers

The Mergers were accounted for under the acquisition method for business combinations pursuant to GAAP, with the Company as the accounting acquirer of Global II. The consideration transferred by the Company to acquire Global II established a new accounting basis for the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interests, measured at their respective fair value as of the Merger Date. The actual value of the Merger Consideration was based upon the market price of Common Stock at the time of closing of the Merger.

Acquired Related Party Receivable

On December 16, 2016, Global II entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) with American Realty Capital Global II Advisors, LLC (“Global II Advisor”) and AR Global, the parent of the Global II Advisor, pursuant to which the Global II Advisor agreed to reimburse Global II $6.3 million in organization and offering costs incurred by Global II in its IPO (the “Global II IPO”) that exceeded 2.0% of gross offering proceeds in the Global II IPO (the “Excess Amount”). Global II's IPO was suspended in November 2015 and lapsed in accordance with its terms in August 2016. The Letter Agreement was negotiated on behalf of Global II, and approved, by the independent directors of Global II.

The Letter Agreement provided for reimbursement of the Excess Amount to Global II through (1) the tender of 22,115 Class B Units of limited partnership interest of Global II’s OP ("Global II Class B Units"), previously issued to the Global II Advisor as payment in lieu of cash for its provision of asset management services, and (2) the payment of the balance of the Excess Amount in equal cash installments over an eight -month period. The value of the Excess Amount was determined using a valuation for each Global II Class B Unit based on the 30 -day volume weighted average price of each share of Common Stock on the Merger Date.

Upon consummation of the Merger, Class B Units were tendered to Global II and the balance of the excess amount of $5.1 million was payable in eight equal monthly installments beginning on January 15, 2017 . Such receivable was acquired by the Company in the Merger. As of September 30, 2017 , the Company had received the full amount of $5.1 million in payments with respect to the excess organization and offering costs incurred by Global II.

Note 4 —  Real Estate Investments, Net

Property Acquisitions

The following table presents the allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 based on contract purchase price and exchange rate at the time of purchase. All of the Company's acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were asset acquisitions. There were no acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 .