PART I

The following table reconciles net loss to EBITDA for the periods presented:

Notes:

(i) The Company has initially applied IFRS 16 as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Under this approach, comparative information is not restated and the cumulative effect of initially applying IFRS 16 is recognized in retained earnings at the date of initial application. For further information, see Item 18. Financial Statements, Note 3 “Summary of significant accounting policies” to the consolidated financial statements.

(ii) Comparative figures for the year ended December 31, 2017 were restated for immaterial errors. For further information, see Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 28, 2019, Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements, Note 6 “Correction of errors” to the consolidated financial statements. 

(iii) The Company has initially applied IFRS 15 and IFRS 9 as of January 1, 2018. Under the transition methods chosen, comparative information has not been restated. For further information, see Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 28, 2019, Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements, Note 3  “Summary of significant accounting policies” to the consolidated financial statements. 

B.          CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not applicable.

C.          REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

D. RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

If we cannot meet the continued listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, our ADSs may be subject to delisting from the New York Stock Exchange, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects and liquidity and value of our ADSs.

Our ADSs are currently listed on the NYSE. On April 20, 2020, we received a notice (the “Notice”) from the NYSE stating that we were not in compliance with 802.01C of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, which requires that we maintain a minimum average closing price of at least $1.00 per share during a consecutive 30 trading-day period (the “$1.00 Price Standard”). As of April 17, 2020, the average closing price of our ADSs was less than $1.00 per share over a consecutive 30 trading-day period. While we intend to regain compliance with the $1.00 Price Standard by the end of the six-month cure period, there is no assurance we will be able to accomplish this. Regaining compliance with the $1.00 Price Standard may include revising the ratio of our ADSs to ordinary shares. Pursuant to the terms of our Depositary Agreement, such a change would not require approval of our ADS holders.

On August 23, 2019, we received a notice from the NYSE stating that we were not in compliance with Section 802.01B of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual due to the fact that our average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period was less than $50 million and, at the same time, our shareholders’ equity was less than $50 million (the “$50 Million Market Capitalization Standard”). Our ADSs are permitted to continue to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “VJET”, but will have an added designation of “.BC-FC” to indicate the status of the non-compliance with continued listing standards. 

We submitted a compliance plan to the NYSE on November 19, 2019 disclosing our plans to regain compliance with the $50 Million Market Capitalization Standard by February 23, 2021. While the NYSE has accepted our compliance plan on January 24, 2020, we are subject to periodic review by the NYSE on a quarterly basis to provide an

update of the current quarter’s progress versus the plan submitted. If we are not in compliance with the $50 Million Market Capitalization Standard by the end of the plan period, or if we do not make progress consistent with the plan during the plan period, the NYSE may initiate delisting proceedings and our ADSs may be delisted. While we intend to regain compliance with the $50 Million Market Capitalization Standard by the end of the cure period, there is no assurance we will be able to accomplish this.

Because the SEC declared effective on April 21, 2020 a COVID-19-triggered NYSE proposal to toll compliance with NYSE’s $50 Million Market Capitalization Standard and $1.00 Price Standard through June 30, 2020, the Company’s cure period for both the $50 Million Market Capitalization Standard and the $1.00 Price Standard will recommence on July 1, 2020. 

In addition, under Section 802.01B of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, if our average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less than $15 million (the “$15 Million Market Capitalization Standard”), the NYSE will promptly initiate suspension and delisting procedures; we will not have any opportunity to regain compliance and our ADSs will be delisted.  In light of market-wide declines caused by the COVID-19 (as defined below) pandemic, on March 20, 2020, the SEC granted the NYSE’s proposed suspension of the enforcement of the $15 Million Market Capitalization Standard until June 30, 2020. However, there is no assurance that the SEC will extend the suspension period beyond June 30, 2020 even if the market-wide declines continue. Accordingly, if we are below the $15 Million Market Capitalization Standard after June 30, 2020 and the SEC has not suspended application of the rule, the NYSE will commence suspension and delisting procedures in respect of our ADSs.

A delisting of our ADSs could negatively impact us by, among other things, reducing the liquidity and market price of our ADSs and reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our ADSs. A suspension or delisting could also adversely affect our relationships with our business partners and suppliers and customers’ and potential customers’ decisions to purchase our products and services, and would have a material, adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, a suspension or delisting would impair our ability to raise additional capital through equity or debt financing. Moreover, delisting from the NYSE might negatively impact our reputation and, as a consequence, our business.

Should the delisting occur and we are unable to list on another public exchange our ADSs could be traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board, or in the so-called “pink sheets.” In the event of such trading, it is highly likely that there would be: significantly less liquidity in the trading of our ADSs; decreases in institutional and other investor demand for our ADSs, coverage by securities analysts, market making activity and information available concerning trading prices and volume; and fewer broker-dealers willing to execute trades in our ADSs. The occurrence of any of these events could result in a further decline in the market price of our ADSs.

We have incurred losses to date and anticipate continuing to incur losses in the future, and there are material uncertainties which cast significant doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 have been prepared on the basis that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred significant losses since our IPO and we expect that we will continue to incur losses as we aim to successfully execute our business plan and will be dependent on additional public or private financings, collaborations or licensing arrangements with strategic partners, or additional credit lines or other debt financing sources to fund continuing operations. Based on our cash balances and recurring losses since inception, there are material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt upon our ability to continue as a going concern.

We expect that we will continue to incur losses and negative cash flows from operations for at least the next 12 months following the issuance of the financial statements. As of December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit of € 60.4 million and had cash and cash equivalents, short-term financial assets and restricted cash of total € 11.8 million. We have significant outstanding debt and contractual obligations related to interest payments and leases. As of December 31, 2019, our debt totaled € 17.5 million, of which € 11.3 million is classified as current. Our debt service obligations over the next twelve months are significant, including € 1.0 million of anticipated interest payments.  Furthermore, our debt agreement with the European Investment Bank (the “EIB”) contains financial  covenants, the breach of which could trigger the acceleration of our loan repayment obligations, which would put us at risk of default. In addition, as of December 31, 2019, we were in non-compliance with the financial covenants related to loan agreements with

Kreissparkasse Augsburg, Germany and consequently pledged € 2.0 million in favor of Kreissparkasse. The circumstance that those € 2.0 million have been pledged and therefore are restricted since then, has been considered within management’s assessment of going concern.

As of December 31, 2019, we were in breach of the Total Net Financial Debt to EBITDA financial covenant under the Finance Contract with the EIB, which requires that we maintain certain minimum ratios. In March 2020, we received a waiver for the covenant breaches in 2019 and a grace period ending March 31, 2021, during which (i) voxeljet can rectify such breaches and (ii) the EIB shall not demand immediate repayment. In return, in March 2020 we registered a first rank land charge amounting to € 10.0 million on our land and facility located in Friedberg (Germany) Paul-Lenz-Straße, 1a as collateral in favor of the EIB.

We expect to incur additional costs and expenses related to the continued development and expansion of our business, including the maintenance of operation of our manufacturing facilities, contract manufacturing and research and development operations. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

Our operating plans for 2020 contemplate a significant reduction in our net operating cash outflows as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 resulting from (i) revenue growth from sales of existing and new products with positive gross margins, (ii) reduced operating expenses through the restructuring of our subsidiary voxeljet UK as well as the initiated restructuring of the German operation, which will be completed within fiscal year 2020. In addition, we may need to obtain additional funding from equity or debt financings, which may require us to agree to burdensome covenants, grant further security interests in our assets, enter into collaboration and licensing arrangements that require us to relinquish commercial rights, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable. No assurance can be given at this time as to whether we will be able to achieve our expense reduction or fundraising objectives, regardless of the terms. If we are unable to raise additional financing, or if other expected sources of funding are delayed or not received, our ability to continue as a going concern would be jeopardized and we may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate some of our general and administrative, research and development, or production activities or other operations and reduce investment in new product and commercial development efforts in an effort to provide sufficient funds to continue our operations. If any of these events occurs, our ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals would be adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to continue as a going concern, we may be unable to meet our obligations under our existing debt facilities, which could result in an acceleration of our obligation to repay all amounts outstanding under those facilities, and we may be forced to liquidate our assets. In such a scenario, the value we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the value reflected in our financial statements. Please also refer to risk factor “We face risks related to health epidemics and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, such as coronavirus, which could significantly disrupt our operations and impact our operating results and/or cash flows.”.

Our consolidated financial statements assume the Company is a going concern and therefore do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and cause investors to suffer the loss of all or a substantial portion of their investment.

Matters relating to or arising from our Audit Committee investigation, including potential regulatory investigations and proceedings, litigation matters, and additional expenses, may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

As previously disclosed in our public filings with the SEC, the Audit Committee completed an internal investigation (the “Audit Committee Investigation”). The Company has self-reported to the Enforcement Division of the SEC on these matters and will fully cooperate in any review by the SEC, although we are unable at this time to predict what action, if any, it may take.

The Audit Committee Investigation concluded in April 2020. The Audit Committee did not find fraud or intentional misconduct by the Company’s management or accounting personnel. However, the Audit Committee did note certain weaknesses and a degree of informality with respect to certain processes pertaining to aspects of the review and tracking of financial reporting and disclosure. The Audit Committee proposed certain recommendations, including implementing additional training with respect to the Company’s reporting and auditing obligations and requirements and developing and documenting an enhanced risk assessment process and internal

controls system in corresponding areas. For more information on the Audit Committee Investigation, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Audit Committee Investigation.”

We may devote significant time and attention, and incur significant expenses, in connection with remediation of the deficiencies in our risk management and controls identified by the Audit Committee Investigation. For more information on our material weaknesses, see “—Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting have been identified, and if we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.” and “Item 15. Controls and Procedures.”

Any resulting SEC actions in connection with the Audit Committee Investigation cannot be predicted. If the SEC commences an investigative process, and/or initiates an enforcement proceeding, we could be required to pay civil penalties, which could be substantial, and/or be subject to other remedies. We can provide no assurances as to the outcome of any governmental investigation.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant expenses related to legal and other professional services in connection with the Audit Committee Investigation, which may continue to adversely affect our business and financial condition. In addition, the outcome of any regulatory proceedings, litigation or government enforcement actions that may result from these matters is difficult to predict, and the cost to defend, settle, or otherwise resolve these matters may be significant. Regulatory agencies or authorities, or other parties in these matters may seek very large or indeterminate amounts. An unfavorable resolution of litigations, proceedings or actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations and cash flows and also could result in a significant burden on management time and resources. Any future investigations or additional lawsuits may also adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.

We have a total debt of € 17.5 million outstanding as of December 31, 2019 out of which € 10.0 million is borrowed from the EIB. We are obliged to pay a Performance Participation Interest (“PPI”) to EIB based on the market price of our shares at the maturity of the Warrant Agreement. Payment of PPI to EIB may adversely affect our financial condition and have a significant negative impact on our cash flows. We have breached our Total Net Financial Debt to EBITDA ratio financial covenant under the Finance Contract with the EIB, as of December 31, 2019. However, in March 2020, we received a waiver for the covenant as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2019 and a grace period, ending March 31, 2021, within which the EIB cannot demand immediate repayment and we can rectify the breach. In return, we registered a first rank land charge on our land and facility located in Friedberg (Germany) Paul-Lenz-Straße, 1a as collateral in favor of the EIB in March 2020. While we have obtained a waiver and a grace period of our financial covenant breaches in 2019, our ability to meet the financial covenants or requirements in our debt arrangements going forward may be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will satisfy such covenants and requirements. A breach of these covenants or our inability to comply with the restrictions could result in an event of default under our debt arrangements which, in turn, could result in an event of default under the terms of our other indebtedness. If this were to happen, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full the payments due under those arrangements or our other indebtedness or that we could find alternative financing to replace that indebtedness.

Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate.

Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate from quarter‑to‑quarter and year‑to‑year and are likely to continue to vary due to a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. A significant portion of our 3D printer orders are typically received during the second and fourth quarters of the fiscal year as a result of the timing of capital expenditures of our customers. Our 3D printers typically are shipped between three and nine months after an order is received. Thus, revenues and operating results for any future period are not predictable with any significant degree of certainty. We also typically experience weaker demand for our 3D printers in the first and third quarters. For these reasons, comparing our operating results on a period‑to‑period basis may not be meaningful. Until our business grows more significantly, the timing of individual printer sales, because of the cost of our largest printers, can have

meaningful effects on our quarterly results. You should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Please also refer to risk factor “We face risks related to health epidemics and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, such as coronavirus, which could significantly disrupt our operations and impact our operating results and/or cash flows.”.

Fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition may occur due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those listed below and those identified throughout this annual report:

Our margins and EBIT may fluctuate.

Margins and EBIT in both our Systems and Services segments may fluctuate from quarter‑to‑quarter and year‑to‑year and are likely to continue to vary due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, increased competition and increased expenses. To pursue our growth strategy, we have expanded by establishing operations in different countries. While the subsidiary in China is in the start‑up phase, we may not be able to achieve our desired gross margin and EBIT targets for this subsidiary, which may lead to a weaker margin and EBIT contribution from these subsidiaries to us. At our German operation, gross margin and EBIT could also fluctuate significantly, for instance due to changes in demand and other economic factors.

We need to raise additional capital from time to time in order to meet our growth strategy as well as to support the continuation of our operation and may be unable to do so on attractive terms, or at all.

We intend to continue to make investments to support the growth of our business and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to implement our growth strategy, increase market share in our current markets or expand into other markets, or broaden our technology, intellectual property or service capabilities. Accordingly, we require additional investments of capital from time to time, and our existing sources of cash and any funds generated from operations may not provide us with sufficient capital. For various reasons, including material uncertainties that cast significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, any noncompliance with existing or future lending arrangements, additional financing, including raising capital through government or other grant funding, or issuing equity and lease financing for sale and leaseback transactions, may not be available when needed, or may not be available on terms favorable to us. If we fail to obtain adequate capital on a timely basis or if capital cannot be obtained on terms satisfactory to us, we may not be able to achieve our planned rate of growth, which will adversely affect our results of operations.    

Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting have been identified, and if we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.

The Sarbanes‑Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. As of December 31, 2019, we did not maintain an effective control environment attributable to certain identified material weaknesses. We describe these material weaknesses in Item 15. Controls and Procedures. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

Management has disclosed material weaknesses in each of its Forms 20-F over a period of seven years, from fiscal year 2013 through the current fiscal year 2019.

To remediate the material weaknesses, we will continue to develop and implement our remediation plan as described in “Item 15. Controls and Procedures”. Our remediation efforts are not yet complete. There can be no assurance as to when the remediation plan will be fully implemented or whether the remediation efforts will be successful.

Until our remediation plans are fully implemented, our management will continue to devote time and attention to these efforts. The existence of these or other material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could require us to restate our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and cause stockholders to lose confidence in our reported financial information, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and stock price.

Our strategic restructurings may not achieve intended benefits and the related restructuring cost could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In the third quarter of 2019, we started a restructuring for our subsidiary voxeljet UK, which includes the shut down of the service center in the UK accompanied by a reduction in headcount and disposal of certain assets.

Furthermore, we initiated a voluntary reduction in workforce program for our German operations in the first quarter of 2020, which was announced in November 2019. As required under German law, we consulted and negotiated in December 2019 with our German employees’ workers’ council in connection with the restructuring plan and began rolling out a voluntary termination program, which offers employees certain compensation for leaving the Company through a voluntary termination agreement. On April 16, 2020, the voluntary program expired with the result that the desired reduction in headcount has been completely achieved through the voluntary program, and therefore the cost saving targets have been fully implemented.

The Company’s success is dependent on the skills of our key personnel. Our restructuring plans involving workforce reduction may lead to an unintended loss of experienced employees or know-how. The loss of any member of our key personnel and actual or threatened work slowdowns or stoppages could lead to operational delays or cost increases. If these incidents occur or if we are unable to attract, retain and maintain productive relations with our employees and key professionals, our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected. There is also a risk that our restructuring plan will not capture all of the intended benefits or may not result in the expected cost savings. Further, the restructuring may yield unintended consequences such as attrition beyond our targeted workforce reduction. These risks may impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may not be able to introduce new 3D printers and related print materials acceptable to the market or to improve the technology and print materials used in our current 3D printers to meet customer demands.

Our revenues are derived from the sale of new or used and refurbished 3D printers and from the sale of products manufactured using, additive manufacturing. Our market is subject to innovation and technological change. A variety of technologies compete against one another in our market, which is, in part, driven by technological advances and end‑user requirements and preferences, as well as the emergence of new standards and practices. Our ability to compete in the industrial additive manufacturing market depends, in large part, on our success in enhancing and developing new 3D printers, enhancing and adding to our technology and developing and qualifying new materials in which we can print. Recently we developed the VX1300 X, which is characterized by a very fast layer time. Currently we are developing the VX1000 HSS which will upscale the HSS technology to one of our larger scale platforms. Presently the HSS technology is available on the VX200 HSS system. We believe that to remain competitive we must continuously enhance and expand the functionality and features of our products and technologies. However, we may not be able to:

Even if we successfully enhance our existing 3D printers or create new 3D printers, it is likely that new 3D printers and technologies that we develop will eventually supplant our existing 3D printers or that our competitors will create 3D printers that will replace our 3D printers. As a result, any of our products may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by our or others’ technological advances.

The long sales cycle for our products makes the timing of our revenues difficult to predict.

Generally, our 3D printers have a long sales cycle. Because our 3D printers are complex and typically involve significant capital investments by prospective purchasers, we and our sales agents generally need to invest a significant

amount of time educating prospective purchasers about the benefits of our products. As a result, before purchasing our products, potential purchasers may spend a substantial amount of time performing internal assessments before making a purchase. This may cause us to devote significant effort in advance of a potential sale without any guarantee of receiving any related revenues. Delays in sales could cause significant variability in our revenues and operating results for any particular period. In addition to that, delays in sales could lead to an increase in work in progress resulting in an allowance for slow-moving inventories.

Demand for our products may not increase adequately.

The marketplace for industrial manufacturing is dominated by conventional manufacturing methods that do not involve additive manufacturing technology. We may not be able to develop effective strategies to raise awareness among potential customers of the benefits of our additive manufacturing technology. If additive manufacturing technology does not gain market acceptance as an alternative for industrial manufacturing, or if the marketplace adopts additive manufacturing based on a technology other than our technology, we may not be able to increase or sustain the level of sales of our products and machines and our results of operations would be adversely affected as a result. If we are not able to manage the conversion from work in progress to sales, it could lead to an undesirable increase of inventory resulting in allowance for slow-moving inventory.

We may not be able to significantly increase the number of materials for use in our 3D printers quickly enough to meet our business plan, and, if we are successful, we may attract more competitors into our markets, some of which may be much larger than we are. Furthermore, we may not be able to develop our 3D printers to serve in a mass production environment.

Our business plan is dependent in part upon our ability to steadily increase the number of qualified materials in which our 3D printers can print, since this will increase our addressable market. However, qualifying new materials is a complicated engineering task, and there is no way to predict whether, or when, any given material will be qualified. If we cannot hire a sufficient number of skilled people to work on qualifying new materials for printing or if we lack the resources necessary to create a steady flow of new materials, we will not be able to meet our business goals and a competitor may emerge that is better at qualifying new materials, either of which would have an adverse effect on our business results.

If, however, we succeed in qualifying a growing number of materials for use in our 3D printers as well as developing our 3D printers to serve in a mass production environment, that should increase our addressable market, both as to customers and products for customers. However, as we create a larger addressable market, our market may become more attractive to other 3D printing companies or large companies that are not 3D printing companies but which may see an economic opportunity in the markets we have created. Similarly, if our focus on selling large 3D printers and 3D printed products to industrial companies proves successful, an increase in the number of competitors in that particular market is likely to adversely affect our business and financial results.

We are highly dependent upon sales to certain industries.

Our revenues of machines and products are relatively concentrated in companies in the automotive, foundry, aerospace and art and architecture industries and those industries’ respective suppliers. To the extent any of these industries experiences a downturn and we are unable to penetrate and expand into other industries, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Additionally, if any of these industries or their respective suppliers or other providers of manufacturing services develop new technologies or alternatives to manufacture the products that are currently manufactured using our 3D printers, it may adversely affect our results of operations. Recently, we have seen  a decrease in demand from the automotive industry in Europe, which has had a negative impact on our revenues.

If our relationships with suppliers, especially with limited source suppliers of components of and consumables for our products, were to terminate or our manufacturing arrangements were to be disrupted, our business could be adversely affected.

We purchase components and certain sub‑assemblies for our systems and consumables that are used in our print materials from third‑party suppliers. While there are several potential suppliers of most of the components and sub‑assemblies for our systems, and for most of the consumables for our print materials, we currently choose to use only

a limited number of suppliers for several of these components and materials. Our reliance on a limited number of vendors involves a number of risks, including:

In addition, we require any new supplier to become “qualified” pursuant to our internal procedures. The qualification process involves evaluations of varying durations, which may cause production delays if we were required to qualify a new supplier unexpectedly. We generally assemble our systems based on our internal forecasts and the availability of consumables, assemblies, components and finished goods that are supplied to us by third parties, which are subject to various lead times. If certain suppliers were to decide to discontinue production of an assembly, component or consumable that we use, the unanticipated change in the availability of supplies, or unanticipated supply limitations, could cause delays in or loss of sales, increased production or related costs and, consequently, reduced margins, and damage to our reputation. If we are unable to find a suitable supplier for a particular component, consumable or compound, we could be required to modify our existing products to accommodate substitute components, consumables or compounds. In addition, because we use a limited number of suppliers, increases in the prices charged by our suppliers may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, as we may be unable to find a supplier who can supply us at a lower price. As a result, the loss of a limited source supplier could adversely affect our relationships with our customers and our results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to manage the expansion of our operations effectively in order to achieve our projected levels of growth.

We have expanded our operations significantly in recent periods, including both our German and U.S. operations, and our business plan calls for further expansion over the next several years, including Asia and North America. After the restructuring of our UK operation, we are more focused in addressing the automotive and aerospace industry. Our expansion in Asia is proceeding through our subsidiaries in India and China. The legal, market and cultural environment in both India and China represent challenges for our management. We anticipate that further development of our infrastructure and an increase in the number of our employees will be required to achieve our planned broadening of our product offerings and client base, improvements in our 3D printers and materials used in our 3D printers, and our planned international growth. In particular, we must increase our marketing and services staff to support new marketing and service activities and to meet the needs of both new and existing customers. Our ability to successfully increase our marketing efforts is not guaranteed, and if we are not able to successfully increase our marketing efforts, we may not be able to grow our business as intended. Our future success will depend in part upon the ability of our management to manage our growth effectively. If our management is unsuccessful in meeting these challenges, we may not be able to achieve our anticipated level of growth, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Our operations could suffer if we are unable to attract and retain key management or other skilled employees.

Our success depends upon the continued service and performance of our senior management and other key personnel. Our senior management team is critical to the management of our business and operations, as well as to the development of our strategy. The loss of the services of any members of our senior management team could delay or prevent the successful implementation of our growth strategy, or the commercialization of new applications for our 3D printers or other products, or could otherwise adversely affect our ability to manage our Company effectively and carry out our business plan. Members of our senior management team may resign at any time. High demand exists for senior management and other key personnel in the additive manufacturing industry, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain such personnel. We do not carry key‑man insurance on any member of our senior management team.

Our growth and success will also depend on our ability to attract, retain and train additional highly‑qualified scientific, technical, sales, managerial and finance personnel, including qualified personnel with experience and knowledge of IFRS. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience intense competition for qualified personnel. While we intend to continue to provide competitive compensation packages to attract and retain key personnel, some of our competitors for these employees have greater resources and more experience, making it difficult for us to compete successfully for key personnel. If we cannot attract and retain sufficiently qualified technical employees for our research and development and manufacturing operations, we may be unable to develop and commercialize new products or new applications for existing products. Furthermore, possible shortages of skilled personnel, including engineers, in the regions surrounding our European facilities as well as our facilities in China and India could require us to pay more to hire and retain skilled personnel, thereby increasing our costs.

Declines in the prices of our products and services, or in our volume of sales, together with our relatively inflexible cost structure, may adversely affect our financial results.

Our business is subject to price competition. Such price competition may adversely affect our ability to maintain the same degree of profitability, especially during periods of decreased demand. Decreased demand also adversely impacts the volume of our systems sales. If our business is not able to offset price reductions resulting from these pressures, or decreased volume of sales due to contractions in the market, by improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, then our operating results will be adversely affected.

Certain of our operating costs are fixed and cannot readily be reduced, which diminishes the positive impact of our restructuring programs on our operating results. To the extent the market for our products slows, or the 3D printing market contracts, we may be faced with excess manufacturing capacity and excess related costs that cannot readily be reduced, which will adversely impact our results of operations.

Customers may decide to order parts rather than to purchase new or used and refurbished 3D printers. This may result in a significant loss of revenues in the Systems segment.

Our Systems segment revenues largely depend on our ability to sell new or used and refurbished 3D printers to customers. There may be various reasons why customers may choose to order parts from us rather than to purchase the full 3D printer equipment, such as increased convenience, lower maintenance costs, etc. If there is an increasing trend for our customers to place parts orders in lieu of equipment purchase orders and we are unable to reverse that trend, we may experience significant losses in revenues in the Systems segment, which in turn could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We need certain commercial success of the financed research and development project.

We entered into an investment loan commitment of a total of € 25.0 million with the EIB. This loan commitment is guaranteed by the European Union (or “EU”) under the European Fund for Strategic Investments and is limited to 50% of the total cost of a research and development project. The first loan tranche A of € 10.0 million was already disbursed, and further € 15.0 million disbursement of tranches B and C is dependent on achieving certain sales and EBITDA performance targets. However those sales and EBITDA targets have not been met and default has occurred, with an event of default delayed via waiver. We are currently in negotiations with the EIB over (i) an amendment to the Leverage Covenant under the Finance Contract with the EIB, the provision with which we are in non-compliance and (ii) the potential drawing down of tranche B, which may not be successful, and we cannot assure these negotiations will be successful.  The scheduled repayment of any disbursed loan tranches including interest will depend on the success of the financed research and development project.

We face significant competition in many aspects of our business, which could cause our revenues and gross profit margins to decline. Competition could also cause us to reduce sales prices or to incur additional marketing or production costs, which could result in decreased revenue, increased costs and reduced margins.

We compete for customers with a wide variety of producers of equipment for models, prototypes, other 3D objects and end‑use parts as well as producers of print materials and services for this equipment. Some of our existing and potential competitors are researching, designing, developing and marketing other types of competitive equipment, print materials and services. Many of these competitors have financial, marketing, manufacturing, distribution and other resources that are substantially greater than ours.

We also expect that future competition may arise from the development of allied or related techniques for equipment and print materials that are not encompassed by our patents, from the issuance of patents to other companies that may inhibit our ability to develop certain products, from our entry into new geographic markets and industries and from improvements to existing print materials and equipment technologies. In addition, a number of companies have announced beginning production of 3D printers, which will further enhance the competition we face.

We intend to continue to follow a strategy of continuing product development to enhance our position to the extent practicable. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our current position in the field or continue to compete successfully against current and future sources of competition. If we do not keep pace with technological change and introduce new products, our revenues and demand for our products may decrease.

If we are not able to convert our work in progress into sales, it could lead to an undesirable increase of inventory and consequently to an allowance for slow-moving inventory.

Our operations outside of Germany subject us to various risks, and our failure to manage these risks could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business is subject to certain risks associated with doing business globally. Our sales outside of Germany represented 82%, 75%, and 75% of our total sales in 2019,  2018, and 2017, respectively. We currently have subsidiaries in China, India, the UK and the United States. One of our growth strategies is to further pursue opportunities for our business in several areas around the world, both inside and outside of Germany and Europe, any or all of which could be adversely affected by the risks set forth below. Accordingly, we face significant operational risks as a result of doing business internationally, such as:

Our failure to manage the market and operational risks associated with our international operations effectively could limit the future growth of our business and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our international operations pose currency risks, which may adversely affect our operating results and net income.

Our operating results may be affected by volatility in currency exchange rates and our ability to effectively manage our currency transaction risks. Currency exchange rate fluctuations have had an impact on our results because voxeljet AG provided intercompany loans to its subsidiaries in foreign currency. As we realize our strategy to expand internationally, our exposure to currency risks will increase. We do not manage our foreign currency exposure in a manner that would eliminate the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates. Therefore, changes in exchange rates between these foreign currencies and the Euro will affect our revenues, cost of goods sold, and operating margins, and could result in exchange losses in any given reporting period.

We incur currency transaction risks whenever we enter into either a purchase or a sale transaction using a different currency from the currency in which we report revenues. In such cases we may suffer an exchange loss because we do not currently engage in currency swaps or other currency hedging strategies to address this risk.

Given the volatility of exchange rates, we can give no assurance that we will be able to effectively manage our currency transaction risks or that any volatility in currency exchange rates will not have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.

While we currently have no specific plans to acquire any other businesses, we may, in the future, engage in joint ventures with or make acquisitions of, or investments in, companies that we believe have products or capabilities that are a strategic or commercial fit with our current business or otherwise offer opportunities for our Company. In connection with these acquisitions or investments, we may:

We may not be able to complete future acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete an additional acquisition, we cannot assure you that it will ultimately strengthen our competitive position or that it will be viewed positively by customers, financial markets or investors. Furthermore, future acquisitions could pose numerous additional risks to our operations, including:

Global economic, political and social conditions have adversely impacted our sales and may continue to do so.

The recent declines in the global economy, difficulties in the financial services sector and credit markets, continuing geopolitical uncertainties and other macroeconomic factors all affect spending behavior of potential end-users of our products. The economic uncertainty in Europe, the United States, India, China and other countries may cause end-users to further delay or reduce technology purchases. In particular, a substantial portion of our sales are made to customers in countries in Europe, which has experienced a significant economic crisis beginning in 2007.

For example, the U.K. formally exited the EU on January 31, 2020 and has entered a transition period to negotiate future relation terms with the EU. The lack of clarity about Brexit and future U.K. laws and regulations creates uncertainty for us, as the outcome of these negotiations may affect our business and operations. For example, the imposition of tariffs following the Brexit may have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. Additionally, there also is a risk that other countries may decide to leave the EU. The uncertainty surrounding Brexit not only potentially affects our business in the U.K. and the EU, but may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In extreme cases, we could experience interruptions in production due to the processing of customs formalities or reduced customer spending in the wake of weaker economic performance.  If global economic conditions remain volatile for a prolonged period or if European economies experience further disruptions, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

We face risks related to health epidemics and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, such as coronavirus, which could significantly disrupt our operations and impact our operating results and/or cash flows.

We face various risks related to health epidemics, pandemics and similar outbreaks, including the global outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”). In recent months, the continued spread of COVID-19 has led to disruption and volatility in the global economy and capital markets, which increases the cost of capital and adversely impacts access to capital.

The continued spread of COVID-19 has and may continue to disrupt our supply chain. While we have been able to mitigate any significant disruption, any significant delay, or limit in the ability of customers to perform could impact investment performance and cause other unpredictable events. We currently anticipate customer payment delays for 3D printers sold in the fourth quarter 2019 which could negatively impact our results of operations, however we do not expect defaults. In addition, we expect adverse impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, including decline in revenues for the Services segment and service and maintenance business of the Systems segment mainly during the second quarter of 2020. Also, we expect some delays in installation of 3D printers at customers’ facilities, which could lead to postponed revenue recognition for those transactions. Furthermore, if significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, facility closures, remote working or other restrictions in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, our operations will likely be negatively impacted. Pursuant to government closure orders intended to contain or slow the spread of COVID-19, we may be required to close certain of our facilities in the regions voxeljet operates that perform work that is deemed non-essential. One or more additional facilities could become subject to similar orders, which could further disrupt our operations if the work performed at such facilities cannot be conducted remotely, potentially necessitating the furloughing of some of our employees or a permanent reduction in our workforce.

Our sales, installation and service of 3D printing machines in China and other countries have been and may continue to be disrupted and the future spread of COVID-19 has disrupted our commercial efforts in other countries. If the COVID-19 crisis continues for a prolonged duration, we or our customers may be unable to perform fully on our

contracts , which will likely result in increases in costs and reduction in revenue.  These cost increases may not be fully recoverable or adequately covered by insurance. If we experience difficulty in generating sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations and sustain our operations, which raises material uncertainties that cast significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, we may have difficulty accessing government and state aid.

Our operations in China through our subsidiary, voxeljet China Co. Ltd., have been and may continue to be adversely affected due to the delays in collection of receivables, loss of business and delays in production and fulfilling current or future orders. For example, the planned start of the production of the VX2000 at our Chinese subsidiary at the beginning of 2020 has been delayed due to COVID-19. We continue to work with our stakeholders (including customers, employees, suppliers and local communities) to address responsibly this global pandemic. The long-term effects of COVID-19 to the global economy and to us are difficult to assess or predict, and may include a further decline in the market prices of our ADSs, risks to employee health and safety, risks for the deployment of our products and services (including by limiting our customer support, among others effects resulting from government measures) and reduced sales in geographic locations impacted. Any prolonged restrictive measures put in place in order to control COVID-19 or other adverse public health development in any of our targeted markets may have a material and adverse effect on our business operations, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows. These material uncertainties may also cast significant doubt upon our management’s assumptions regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or other applicable anti‑corruption legislation could result in fines, criminal penalties and an adverse effect on our business.

We operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti‑corruption laws. We are subject, however, to the risk that our officers, directors, employees, agents and collaborators may take action determined to be in violation of such anti‑corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and the European Union Anti‑Corruption Act, as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties or curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business.

We rely on our information technology systems to manage numerous aspects of our business and customer and supplier relationships, and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our results of operations.

We rely on our information technology, or IT, systems to manage numerous aspects of our business and provide analytical information to management. Our IT systems allow us to efficiently purchase products from our suppliers, provide procurement and logistic services, ship products to our customers on a timely basis, maintain cost‑effective operations and provide service to our customers. Our IT systems are an essential component of our business and growth strategies, and a disruption to our IT systems could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business efficiently. In 2019, we had effective general information technology general controls (GITCs) over our Enterprise Resource Planning system that supports the Company’s financial reporting processes. We are required to further automate our processes and reduce the dependence on manual controls, specifically our process of Consolidation of Financial Statements. In late 2019, we launched a project to implement an automated consolidation process using our existing Enterprise Resource Planning system.  Although we assume this will not be the case, we could fail with the technical realization. Further, our computer systems are subject to damage and interruption from power outages,  computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cyber-attack or other security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism, and usage errors by our employees. If our computer systems are damaged or cease to function properly, or, if we do not replace or upgrade certain systems, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them and may experience an interruption of our normal business activities or loss of critical data. Any such disruption could adversely affect our reputation, brand and financial condition. 

Regulation in the areas of privacy, data protection and information security could increase our costs and affect or limit our business opportunities and how we collect and/or use personal information.

As privacy, data protection and information security laws, including data localization laws, are interpreted and applied, compliance costs may increase, particularly in the context of ensuring that adequate data protection and data

transfer mechanisms are in place. In recent years, there has been increasing regulatory enforcement and litigation activity in the areas of privacy, data protection and information security in the U.S., Germany, and in various other countries in which we operate.

In addition, state and federal legislators and/or regulators in the U.S., Germany, and other countries in which we operate are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, data protection and information security laws that potentially could have significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and/or employee information, and some of our current or planned business activities. New legislation or regulation could increase our costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce revenues from certain business initiatives. Moreover, the application of existing or new laws to existing technology and practices can be uncertain and may lead to additional compliance risk and cost.

Our European activities are subject to the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which has created additional compliance requirements for us. GDPR broadens the scope of personal privacy laws to protect the rights of EU citizens and requires organizations to report on data breaches within 72 hours and be bound by stringent rules for obtaining the consent of individuals on how their data can be used. GDPR became enforceable on May 25, 2018, and non-compliance exposes entities such as our company to significant fines or other regulatory claims.

Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws relating to consumer and/or employee data could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. Our failure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory and/or governmental investigations and/or actions, litigation, fines, sanctions, ongoing regulatory monitoring, customer attrition, decreases in the use or acceptance of our products and services and damage to our reputation and our brand.

Defects in new products or in enhancements to our existing products that give rise to product returns or warranty or other claims could result in material expenses, diversion of management time and attention, and damage to our reputation.

Our 3D printing systems may contain undetected defects or errors when first introduced or as enhancements are released that, despite testing, are not discovered until after a system has been used. This could result in delayed market acceptance of those systems or claims from sales agents, end‑users or others, which may result in litigation, increased end‑user service and support costs and warranty claims, damage to our reputation and business, or significant costs to correct the defect or error. We may from time to time become subject to warranty or product liability claims related to product quality issues that could lead us to incur significant expenses.

We could face liability if our 3D printers are used by our customers to print dangerous objects.

Customers may use our 3D printers to print parts that could be used in a harmful way or could otherwise be dangerous. For example, there have been news reports that 3D printers were used to print guns or other weapons. We have little, if any, control over what objects our customers print using our 3D printers, and it may be difficult, if not impossible, for us to monitor and prevent customers from printing weapons with our 3D printers. While we have never printed weapons in any of our service centers, there can be no assurance that we will not be held liable if someone were injured or killed by a weapon printed by a customer using one of our 3D printers.

A loss of a significant number of our sales agents would impair our ability to sell our products and services and could reduce our revenues and adversely impact our operating results.

We expect a significant portion of our sales of our products to be made with the assistance of our network of sales agents. We rely heavily on these sales agents to facilitate sales of our products to end‑users in their respective geographic regions. Furthermore, we rely on sales agents to service our products. These sales agents are generally not precluded from selling our competitors’ products in addition to ours. In addition, they may not be effective in selling our products or servicing our end‑users. Further, if a significant number of these sales agents were to terminate their relationships with us or otherwise fail or refuse to facilitate sales of our products, we may not be able to find replacements that are as qualified or as successful. If these sales agents do not perform as anticipated or if we are unable

to find qualified and successful replacements, our sales will suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues and operating results.

Workplace accidents or environmental damage could result in substantial remedial obligations and damage to our reputation.

Accidents or other incidents that occur at our facilities or involve our personnel or operations could result in claims for damages against us. In addition, in the event we are found to be financially responsible, as a result of environmental or other laws or by court order, for environmental damages alleged to have been caused by us or occurring on our premises, we could be required to pay substantial monetary damages or undertake expensive remedial obligations. The amount of any costs, including fines or damages payments that we might incur under such circumstances could substantially exceed any insurance we have to cover such losses. Any of these events, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could adversely affect our reputation.

Our operations are subject to environmental laws and other government regulations which could result in liabilities in the future.

We are subject to domestic and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing our operations, including, but not limited to, emissions into the air and water and the use, handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances. A certain risk of environmental liability is inherent in our production activities. Under certain environmental laws, we could be held solely or jointly and severally responsible, regardless of fault, for the remediation of any hazardous substance contamination at our facilities and at facilities where our products are used and the respective consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or other environmental damage. We may not have been and may not be at all times in complete compliance with environmental laws, regulations and permits, and the nature of our operations exposes us to the risk of liabilities or claims with respect to environmental and worker health and safety matters. If we violate or fail to comply with environmental laws, regulations and permits, we could be subject to penalties, fines, restrictions on operations or other sanctions, and our operations could be interrupted.

The cost of complying with current and future environmental, health and safety laws applicable to our operations, or the liabilities arising from past releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances, may result in future expenditures. Any of these developments, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities, including liabilities arising from litigation.

In the ordinary course of business, we have been, and in the future may be, subject to various product and non‑product related claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies arising out of our commercial operations, including litigation related to defects in our products. We maintain insurance to cover our potential exposure for most claims and losses. However, our insurance coverage is subject to various exclusions, self‑retentions and deductibles, may be inadequate or unavailable to protect us fully, and may be cancelled or otherwise terminated by the insurer. Furthermore, we face the following additional risks related to our insurance coverage:

Even a partially uninsured claim of significant size, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. However, even if we successfully defend ourselves against any such claim, we could be forced to spend a substantial amount of money in litigation expenses, our

management could be required to spend valuable time defending these claims and our reputation could suffer, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations.

If our manufacturing facility or any of our on‑demand parts service centers are disrupted, sales of our products may be affected, which could result in loss of revenues and unforeseen costs.

We manufacture our machines at our facility in Germany. We currently operate on‑demand parts service centers located in Germany, the United States, and China and plan to operate in other locations in the future. In the third quarter of 2019, we decided to consolidate 3D printing to serve all customers in Europe from the German service center and restructure the voxeljet UK entity. In this course, the UK service center was closed down in the fourth quarter of 2019, and consequently the lease of the Milton Keynes facility has been terminated early and will end in May 2020. voxeljet UK will expand its sales team and focus on selling 3D printed parts and 3D printers. If the operations of our production facilities are materially disrupted, whether by natural disasters, epidemics or pandemics like COVID-19, demonstrations, acts of terror, or otherwise, we would be unable to fulfill customer orders for the period of the disruption, we would not be able to recognize revenues on orders, we could suffer damage to our reputation, and we might need to modify our standard sales terms to secure the commitment of new customers during the period of the disruption and perhaps longer. Depending on the cause of the disruption, we could incur significant costs to remedy the disruption and resume product shipments. Such a disruption could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our future income taxes could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof, in jurisdictions around the world. In addition, there is a risk that amounts paid or received in transactions between us and one of our international subsidiaries could be deemed for transfer pricing purposes to be lower or higher than we previously recognized or expected to recognize, or that distributions to us from one of our international subsidiaries could be subject to withholding tax. Our determination of our tax liability is always subject to review by applicable tax authorities. Any negative outcome of such a review could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. In addition, the determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment, and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and could adversely affect our operating results.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain patent protection for our products or otherwise protect our intellectual property rights, our business could suffer.

We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets and confidentiality agreements and other contractual arrangements with our employees, end‑users and others to maintain our competitive position. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain patent protection for or maintain as trade secrets our proprietary products, technologies and inventions and to maintain the confidentiality of our trade secrets and know‑how, operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others and prevent others from infringing upon our business proprietary rights.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, it is possible that competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies, inventions, processes or improvements. We cannot assure you that any of our existing or future patents or other intellectual property rights will be enforceable, will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or will otherwise provide us with meaningful protection or any competitive advantage. In addition, our pending patent applications may not be granted, and we may not be able to obtain foreign patents or elect to file applications corresponding to our U.S. and EU patents. The laws of certain countries outside the United States and EU may not provide the same level of patent protection as in the United States and the EU, so even if we assert our patents or obtain additional patents in countries outside of the United States and the EU, effective enforcement of such patents may not be available. If our patents do not adequately protect our technology, our competitors may be able to offer additive manufacturing systems or other products similar to ours. Our competitors may also be able to develop similar technology independently or design around our patents, and we may not be able to detect the unauthorized use of our proprietary technology or take appropriate steps to prevent such use. Any of the foregoing events would lead to increased competition and lower revenues or gross margins, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We may not be able to protect our trade secrets and intellectual property.

While some of our technology is licensed under patents belonging to others or is covered by process patents which are owned or applied for by us, much of our key technology is not protected by patents. Furthermore, patents are jurisdictional in nature and therefore only protect us in certain markets, rather than globally. In particular, in fast‑growing markets such as China and India, our technology is not protected by patents. We have devoted substantial resources to the development of our technology, trade secrets, know‑how and other unregistered proprietary rights. While we enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements intended to protect such rights, such agreements can be difficult and costly to enforce or may not provide adequate remedies if violated. Such agreements may be breached and confidential information may be willfully or unintentionally disclosed, or our competitors or other parties may learn of the information in some other way. Since we cannot legally prevent one or more other companies from developing similar or identical technology to our unpatented technology, it is likely that, over time, one or more other companies may be able to replicate our technology, thereby reducing our technological advantages. If we do not protect our technology or are unable to develop new technology that can be protected by patents or as trade secrets, we may face increased competition from other companies, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We have license rights and exclusivity of certain patents and intellectual property and cannot adequately estimate the effects of their expiration upon the entrance or advancement of competitors into the additive manufacturing industrial market.

We have exclusive and non‑exclusive license rights to certain patents that we utilize in the industrial market. Some of these patents have already expired, and others will expire within the next one to three years. We cannot adequately estimate the effect that the expiration of these patents will have upon the entrance or advancement of other additive manufacturing manufacturers into the industrial market. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Intellectual Property.”

We may be subject to claims alleging patent infringement.

Our products and technology, including the technology that we license from others, may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties. Patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time until they are published, and the publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature typically lags actual discoveries by several months or more. As a result, the nature of claims contained in unpublished patent filings around the world is unknown to us, and we cannot be certain that we were the first to conceive inventions covered by our patents or patent applications or that we were the first to file patent applications covering such inventions. Furthermore, it is not possible to know in which countries patent holders may choose to extend their filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or other mechanisms. In addition, we may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims from individuals, vendors and other companies, including those that are in the business of asserting patents, but are not commercializing products in the field of 3D printing. Any claims that our products or processes infringe the intellectual property rights of others, regardless of the merit or resolution of such claims, could cause us to incur significant costs in responding to, defending and resolving such claims, and may prohibit or otherwise impair our ability to commercialize new or existing products. Any infringement by us or our licensors of the intellectual property rights of third parties may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Third‑party claims of intellectual property infringement successfully asserted against us may require us to redesign infringing technology or enter into costly settlement or license agreements on terms that are unfavorable to us, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our products, subject us to injunctions restricting our sale of products and use of infringing technology, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the markets in which we compete, impose costly damage awards or require indemnification of our sales agents and end‑users. In addition, as a consequence of such claims, we may incur significant costs in acquiring the necessary third‑party intellectual property rights for use in our products or developing non‑infringing substitute technology. Any of the foregoing developments could seriously harm our business.

We may incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual property rights and defending against third‑party claims as a result of litigation or other proceedings.

In connection with the enforcement of our intellectual property rights, opposing third parties from obtaining patent rights or disputes related to the validity or alleged infringement of our or third‑party intellectual property rights,

including patent rights, we have been and may in the future be subject or party to claims, negotiations or complex, protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and litigation, regardless of merit, can be costly and disruptive to our business operations by diverting attention and energies of management and key technical personnel, and by increasing our costs of doing business. We may not prevail in any such dispute or litigation, and an adverse decision in any legal action involving intellectual property rights, including any such action commenced by us, could limit the scope of our intellectual property rights and the value of the related technology. While we strive to avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to avoid any infringement claims.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, documentary, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non‑compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non‑compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non‑payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or our exclusive licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our products and processes, our competitive position would be adversely affected.

We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

Certain of our past and present employees were previously employed at other additive manufacturing companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees executed proprietary rights, non‑disclosure and non‑competition agreements in connection with such previous employment. Although we try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary information or know‑how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such employee’s former employer. We are not aware of any threatened or pending claims related to these matters, but in the future litigation may be necessary to defend against such claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable personnel or intellectual property rights. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management. As we expand our operations into the United States and elsewhere, we may face similar claims with regard to our future employees in these countries.

Certain of our employees and patents are subject to German law.

The majority of our employees work in Germany and are subject to German employment law. Ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions made by such employees and consultants are subject to the provisions of the German Act on Employees’ Inventions (Gesetz über Arbeitnehmererfindungen), which regulates the ownership of, and compensation for, inventions made by employees. We face the risk that disputes can occur between us and our employees or ex‑ employees pertaining to alleged non‑adherence to the provisions of this act that may be costly to defend and take up our management’s time and efforts whether we prevail or fail in such dispute. In addition, under the German Act on Employees’ Inventions, certain employees retained rights to patents they invented or co‑invented prior to 2009. Although most of these employees have subsequently assigned their interest in these patents to us, there is a risk that the compensation we provided to them may be deemed to be insufficient and we may be required under German law to increase the compensation due to such employees for the use of the patents. In those cases where employees have not assigned their interests to us, we may need to pay compensation for the use of those patents. If we are required to pay additional compensation or face other disputes under the German Act on Employees’ Inventions, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

If we fail to comply with our obligations under our intellectual property-related agreements or if we receive an adverse court decision in a lawsuit regarding these agreements, we could lose rights that are important to our business or be subject to restrictions on the conduct of our business.

We have license and co-ownership agreements with respect to certain intellectual property that is important to our business with both Z Corp and The ExOne Company, or ExOne, respectively, that impose restrictions on our use of certain intellectual property. We are party to other intellectual property-related agreements that also are important to our business. Disputes may arise between the counterparties to these agreements and us that could result in termination of these agreements, costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management’s attention and company resources, regulatory review or restrictions on the conduct of our business. If we fail to comply with our obligations under our intellectual property-related agreements or receive an adverse court decision in a lawsuit regarding these agreements, the counterparties may have the right to terminate these agreements or sue us for damages or equitable remedies, including injunctive relief. Termination of these agreements, the reduction or elimination of our rights under these agreements, or the imposition of restrictions under these agreements may result in our having to negotiate new or reinstated licenses with less favorable terms, or to cease commercialization of licensed technology and products. This could materially adversely affect our business. In March 2018, ExOne GmbH, a subsidiary of ExOne, notified us of their intent not to pay their annual license fees under an existing intellectual property-related agreement and asserted their rights to claim damages pursuant to an alleged material breach of the agreement. While we dispute these claims, the matter could result in one or more of the risks discussed herein.

Certain technologies and patents have been developed with partners and we may face restrictions on this jointly‑developed intellectual property.

We have entered into cooperation agreements with a number of industrial and commercial partners, as well as university partners. We have, in some cases individually and in other cases along with our partners, filed for patent protection for a number of technologies developed under these agreements and may in the future file for further intellectual property protection and/or seek to commercialize such technologies. Under some of these agreements, certain intellectual property developed by us and the relevant partner may be subject to joint ownership by us and the partner and our commercial use of such intellectual property may be restricted, or may require written consent from, or a separate agreement with, the partner. In other cases, we may not have any rights to use intellectual property solely developed and owned by the partner. If we cannot obtain commercial use rights for such jointly‑owned intellectual property or partner‑owned intellectual property, our future product development and commercialization plans may be adversely affected.

Risks related to our ADSs

The price of our ADSs may fluctuate significantly.

The stock market generally, including our ADSs, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of listed companies. Over the past few years, the market price of our ADSs has experienced a significant decline from which it has not fully recovered and may not fully recover.  Broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance. The market price and liquidity of the market for our ADSs may fluctuate and may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

For a discussion of the price of our ADSs and market capitalization, risk of delisting from the NYSE, and NYSE compliance plan, see “—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—“If we cannot meet the continued listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, our ADSs may be subject to delisting from the New York Stock Exchange, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects and liquidity and value of our ADSs.”

Substantial future sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the price of the ADSs to decline.

Future sales of a substantial number of our shares or ADSs, or the perception that such sales will occur, could cause a decline in the market price of the ADSs. We have filed a registration statement on Form F-3 with the SEC utilizing a "shelf" registration process, and such shelf registration statement was declared effective on August 28, 2017. Under this shelf registration process, subject to any applicable U.S. securities law rules and regulations, we may offer from time to time up to an aggregate of $75,000,000 of our ordinary shares, debt securities, warrants and rights to subscribe for ordinary shares, in one or more offerings. Pursuant to such shelf registration statement, in October 2018, we issued 972,000 ordinary shares, equivalent to 4,860,000 ADSs, in an underwritten public offering (the “October 2018 Issuance”). In November 2018, we issued additional 144,000 ordinary shares, equivalent to 720,000 ADSs, upon the exercise of the over-allotment option exercised by the underwriter (the “November 2018 Issuance” and together with the October 2018 Issuance, the “Issuance”).   

To the extent that we raise additional funds through the issuance and sale of equity or other securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, ordinary shares or substantially similar securities, the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect shareholder rights and the existing shareholders’ ownership interests will be diluted if the statutory shareholders’ subscription right is not exercised by the shareholders or is excluded by the general shareholders’ meeting or the Management Board.  

Under the German Stock Corporation Act, every shareholder is entitled to subscription rights for new ordinary shares to be issued or for other new securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, ordinary shares or substantially similar securities.

However, our shareholders at the general shareholders’ meeting can resolve to exclude such statutory subscription rights with an affirmative vote of a majority of at least three-quarters of the share capital represented at the meeting. An exclusion of subscription rights also requires a report from the Management Board to the effect that the interests of our Company in excluding the subscription rights outweigh the interests of the shareholders to be entitled to a subscription. An exclusion of subscription rights may be permissible without such justification if our Company is increasing the capital in return for cash contributions, the amount of the capital increase does not exceed 10 percent of the existing share capital of our Company, and the issue price of the new shares is not significantly lower than the trading price for shares in our Company of the same class and having the same features already listed at the time of the final determination of the issue

price. The trading price may also be determined by the market price of an ADS listed on the NYSE, multiplied by the number of ADSs which represent a share.

Shareholders at the general shareholders’ meeting may also authorize the Management Board to exclude the statutory shareholders’ subscription right for new ordinary shares to be issued or for other new securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, ordinary shares or substantially similar securities.

After the Issuance, the Management Board is utilizing the authorized share capital pursuant to Section 5 of the articles of association of our Company – which authorizes the Management Board, with the consent of the supervisory board, to increase our Company's registered share capital in one or more tranches by up to an additional EUR 2,418,000 by issuing up to 2,418,000 new shares (equivalent to 12,090,000 ADSs) against contributions in cash or in kind. The Management Board is authorized to exclude the statutory shareholders’ subscription rights with the consent of the supervisory board (i) to exclude fractional amounts resulting from the subscription ratio from the statutory shareholders’ subscription right, (ii) in case of capital increases in kind, in particular, but without limitation, to acquire companies, divisions of companies or interests in companies or (iii) in case of capital increases in cash provided that the issue price of the new shares is not substantially lower than the trading price for shares in our Company of the same class and having the same conditions already listed at the time of the final determination of the issue price (the trading price shall also be understood to mean the price of an ADS listed on the NYSE multiplied by the number of ADSs representing one share) and further provided that the amount of the share capital represented by the shares issued in this context under the exclusion of the statutory shareholders’ subscription tight does not exceed 10 percent of the share capital both at the time when such authorization came into effect and when it is utilized.

In addition, shareholders at the general shareholders’ meeting may from time to time cancel, amend or grant new authorizations to the Management Board to exclude the statutory shareholders’ subscription rights, also for capital increases in cash for the purpose of issuing shares that are to be placed on the U.S. capital market or with institutional investors from any jurisdiction by means of ADSs, and in the same context also to cover an over-allotment option granted to the issuing banks.

Our principal shareholders and management own a significant percentage of our ordinary shares and will be able to exert significant influence over matters subject to shareholder approval.

Members of our Management Board currently beneficially own 18.2% of our ordinary shares (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs). These shareholders have significant influence over the outcome of all matters requiring shareholder approval. For example, these shareholders may be able to influence the outcome of elections of members of our Supervisory Board, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transactions. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our ordinary shares or ADSs that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our shareholders. The interests of this group of shareholders may not always coincide with your interests or the interests of other shareholders, and they may act in a manner that advances their best interests and not necessarily those of other shareholders, including seeking a premium value for their ordinary shares, which might affect the prevailing market price for our ADSs.

Holders of our ADSs may not have the same voting rights as the holders of our ordinary shares and may not receive voting materials in time to be able to exercise your right to vote.

Except as described in this annual report and the deposit agreement relating to our ADSs, holders of the ADSs will not be able to exercise voting rights attaching to the ordinary shares evidenced by the ADSs on an individual basis. Under the terms of the deposit agreement, holders of the ADSs appoint the depositary or its nominee as their representative to exercise the voting rights attaching to the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs. You may not receive voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote, and it is possible that you, or persons who hold their ADSs through brokers, dealers or other third parties, will not have the opportunity to exercise a right to vote.

You may not receive distributions on our ordinary shares represented by the ADSs or any value for them.

Under the terms of the deposit agreement relating to our ADSs, the depositary for the ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends, if any, or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our ordinary shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the

number of our ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the deposit agreement, it may be unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to holders of ADSs. In addition, with respect to distributions of rights to subscribe for additional ordinary shares or ADSs, such distributions will only be made if we request such rights be made available to holders of the ADSs. We have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of the ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of the ADSs. This means that you may not receive the distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value from them. These restrictions may have a material adverse effect on the value of your ADSs.

We have no present intention to pay dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future and, consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment during that time is if the price of our ADSs appreciates.

We have no present intention to pay dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. Any recommendation by our Management and Supervisory Boards to pay dividends will depend on many factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, legal requirements and other factors. Accordingly, if the price of our ADSs declines in the foreseeable future, you will incur a loss on your investment, without the likelihood that this loss will be offset in part or at all by potential future cash dividends.

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of rules under the U.S. securities laws and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than U.S. companies. This may limit the information available to holders of ADSs.

We are a “foreign private issuer,” as defined in the SEC rules and regulations, and, consequently, we are not subject to all of the disclosure requirements applicable to companies organized within the United States. For example, we are exempt from certain rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that regulate disclosure obligations and procedural requirements related to the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations applicable to a security registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, members of our Management Board and Supervisory Board and our principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short‑swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our securities. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. public companies. Accordingly, there may be less publicly‑available information concerning our Company than there is for U.S. public companies.

As a foreign private issuer, we are required to file an annual report on Form 20‑F within four months of the close of each year ended December 31 and furnish reports on Form 6‑K relating to certain material events promptly after we publicly announce these events. In addition, under the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, we must submit to the SEC a Form 6-K that includes interim earnings reports on a semi-annual basis. Although we intend to issue quarterly financial information, because of the above exemptions for foreign private issuers, we are not required to do so and may not provide quarterly information if we are not able to do so. For example, because of delays described in our previously filed reports, we will not issue quarterly financial information for the first quarter ended March 31, 2020 and instead expect to provide financial results for the six-months ended June 30, 2020 in August 2020. Therefore, holders of our ADSs may not be afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States.

As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to certain New York Stock Exchange corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. listed companies.

We rely on provisions in the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual that permit us to follow our home country corporate governance practices with regard to certain aspects of corporate governance. This allows us to follow German corporate law and the German Corporate Governance Code, which differ in significant respects from the corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. companies listed on the NYSE.

In accordance with our NYSE listing, our Audit Committee is required to comply with or satisfy an exemption from the provisions of Section 301 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act and Rule 10A‑3 of the Exchange Act, both of which are also applicable to listed U.S. companies. Because we are a foreign private issuer, however, we generally are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the corporate governance standards provided in the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual. In particular, we are not required to comply with the requirements that the members of our Audit Committee satisfy financial literacy standards, that a majority of the members of our Supervisory Board must be independent, that our Audit Committee and Compensation and Nominating Committee adopt written charters and that we adopt and

disclose corporate governance guidelines. If some investors find the ADSs less attractive as a result of these differences, there may be a less active trading market for the ADSs and the price of the ADSs may be more volatile. See “Item 16.G Corporate Governance.”

We may lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, which could result in significant additional costs and expenses.

As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with all the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and related rules and regulations. The determination of foreign private issuer status is made annually on the last business day of an issuer’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Accordingly, we will next make a determination with respect to our foreign private issuer status on June 30, 2020. There is a risk that we will lose our foreign private issuer status in the future.

We would lose our foreign private issuer status if, for example, more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States and we continue to fail to meet additional requirements necessary to maintain our foreign private issuer status. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 13% of our assets were located in the United States, although this may increase as we expand our operations in the United States. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws as a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly greater than the costs we incur as a foreign private issuer. If we are not a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive in certain respects than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. We would be required under current SEC rules to prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and modify certain of our policies to comply with corporate governance practices associated with U.S. domestic issuers. Such conversion and modifications would involve additional costs. In addition, we may lose our ability to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements on the NYSE that are available to foreign private issuers such as the ones described above and exemptions from procedural requirements related to the solicitation of proxies.

We incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a company whose ADSs are publicly traded in the United States, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a company whose ADSs commenced trading in the United States in October 2013, we incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses that we did not incur before going public. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related rules implemented by the SEC and the NYSE have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls. Our management and other personnel must devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time‑consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations have made it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult and expensive for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Supervisory Board or its committees or on our Management Board. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of the ADSs, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.

U.S. investors may have difficulty enforcing civil liabilities against our Company or members of our Management and Supervisory Boards.

The members of our Management and Supervisory Boards are non‑residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of the assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible, or may be very difficult, to serve process on such persons or us in the United States or to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts against them or us based on civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States. In addition, awards of punitive damages in actions brought in the United States or elsewhere may be unenforceable in Germany. An award for monetary damages under the U.S. securities laws would be considered punitive if it does not seek to compensate the claimant for loss or damage suffered and is intended to punish the defendant. The enforceability of any judgment in Germany will depend on the particular facts of the case as well as the laws and treaties in effect at the time. Litigation in Germany is also subject to rules of procedure that differ from the U.S. rules, including with respect to the taking and admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the proceedings and the allocation of costs. Proceedings in Germany

would have to be conducted in the German language, and all documents submitted to the court would, in principle, have to be translated into German. For these reasons, it may be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original action in a German court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and the members of our Management and Supervisory Boards. The United States and Germany do not currently have a treaty providing for recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters, though recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Germany is possible in accordance with applicable German laws.

You may be subject to limitations on the transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems doing so expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with corporate events such as a rights offering, during which time the depositary needs to maintain an exact number of ADS holders on its books for a specified period. The depositary may also close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of our ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks that it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement. As a result, you may be unable to transfer your ADSs when you wish to.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they or anyone else gives negative recommendations regarding our ADSs, the market price for our ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our ADSs will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade our ADSs, the market price for our ADSs would likely decline. If other individuals, including short sellers, disseminate negative information regarding our business or our ADSs, the market price for our ADSs may also decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which, in turn, could cause the market price or trading volume for our ADSs to decline.

Your rights as a shareholder in a German corporation may differ from your rights as a shareholder in a U.S. corporation.

We are organized as a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) under the laws of Germany. You should be aware that the rights of shareholders under German law differ in important respects from those of shareholders in a U.S. corporation. These differences include, in particular:

For more information, we have provided summaries of relevant German corporation law and of our articles of association under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices” and “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.”

Exchange rate fluctuations may reduce the amount of U.S. dollars you receive in respect of any dividends or other distributions we may pay in the future in connection with your ADSs.

Under German law, the determination of whether we have been sufficiently profitable to pay dividends is made on the basis of our unconsolidated annual financial statements prepared under the German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Germany. Exchange rate fluctuations may affect the amount in U.S. dollars that our shareholders receive upon the payment of cash dividends or other distributions we declare and pay in Euros, if any. Such fluctuations could adversely affect the value of our ADSs and, in turn, the U.S. dollar proceeds that holders receive from the sale of our ADSs.

In the event we are or become treated as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, U.S. holders of our ADSs could be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

In the event we were treated as a PFIC, U.S. holders (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Taxation of ADSs”) of our ADSs could be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences. These consequences include the following: (i) if our ADSs are “marketable stock” for purposes of the PFIC rules and a U.S. holder makes a mark‑to‑market election with respect to its ADSs, the U.S. holder will be required to include annually in its U.S. federal taxable income an amount reflecting any year‑end increase in the value of its ADSs, (ii) if a U.S. holder does not make a mark‑to‑market election, it may incur significant additional U.S. federal income taxes on income resulting from distributions on, or any gain from the disposition of, our ADSs, as such income generally would be allocated over the U.S. holder’s holding period for its ADSs and subject to tax at the highest rates of U.S. federal income taxation in effect for such years, with an interest charge then imposed on the resulting taxes in respect of such income, and (iii) dividends paid by us would not be eligible for reduced individual rates of U.S. federal income tax. We do not intend to furnish holders with the information necessary to make a “qualified electing fund” election in lieu of a mark-to-market election. In addition, U.S. holders that own an interest in a PFIC are required to file additional U.S. federal tax information returns.

A U.S. holder may in certain circumstances mitigate adverse tax consequences of the PFIC rules by filing an election to treat the PFIC as a qualified electing fund, or a QEF. However, in the event that we are or become a PFIC, we do not intend to comply with the reporting requirements necessary to permit U.S. holders to elect to treat us as a QEF. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Additional United States Federal Income Tax Consequences—PFIC Rules.”

On October 23, 2013, we sold 5,600,000 ADSs in our initial public offering at a price of $13.00 per ADS, thereby raising $72.8 million (before underwriting discounts and costs). The ADSs we sold in the initial public offering represented new shares issued in a capital increase resolved by our shareholders for purposes of the initial public offering on October 11, 2013.

On April 16, 2014, we completed a follow‑on offering of 3,000,000 ADSs at a public offering price of $15.00 per ADS. Net proceeds from the follow‑on offering to the Company were approximately $41.4 million. On April 24, 2014, the underwriters in the follow‑on offering purchased 450,000 ADSs from certain of the Company’s shareholders (the “Selling Shareholders”) pursuant to the overallotment option they were granted in the follow‑on offering. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of ADSs by the Selling Shareholders.

On October 17, 2018, we issued 972,000 ordinary shares, equivalent to 4,860,000 ADSs, at an offering price of $2.57 per ADS (the “Public Offering Price”). The Company received net proceeds of approximately $10.6 million. Members of our Management Board, who are also significant shareholders, purchased an aggregate number of 233,462 ADSs in this offering at the Public Offering Price. On November 8, 2018, we closed the over-allotment option in which we issued additional 144,000 ordinary shares, equivalent to 720,000 ADSs. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $1.6 million. 

Our website is www.voxeljet.de. This website address is included in this annual report as an inactive textual reference only. The information and other content appearing on our website are not part of this annual report. Our principal executive offices are located at Paul‑Lenz‑Straße 1a, 86316 Friedberg, Germany, and our telephone number is +49 821 7483 100. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Corporation Service Company, located at 1090 Vermont Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005, telephone number (800) 927‑9800.

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures amounted to €1.1 million, €3.8 million and €3.6 million, for the years ended December 31, 2019,  2018, and 2017,  respectively. In 2019 the capital expenditures mainly comprised the final payment for the new office building and production facility located in Friedberg, Germany, which were completed in October 2017, as well as upgrades of our ERP-System. In 2018 the capital expenditures mainly comprised 3D printers to be used in our Services segment. In 2017, our principal capital expenditures were for the construction of a new office building and production facility located in Friedberg, Germany for approximately € 1.9 million. For further information about the property we purchased in Friedberg, Germany, see “—D. Property, Plants and Equipment.”

B.          BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Our Company

We are a leading provider of high‑speed, large‑format 3D printers and on‑demand parts services to industrial and commercial customers. Our 3D printers employ a powder binding, additive manufacturing technology to produce parts using various material sets, which consist of particulate materials and proprietary chemical binding agents. We offer our customers the highest volumetric output rate in the industry due to the combination of our large build boxes and print speeds. We provide our 3D printers and on‑demand parts services to industrial and commercial customers serving the automotive, aerospace, art and architecture, engineering and consumer product end markets.

We currently offer eight different 3D printer platforms, with build boxes that range from 300 × 200 × 150 millimeters to 4,000 × 2,000 × 1,000 millimeters and various print speeds, which produce volumetric output rates ranging from 0.4 liters per hour to 156.0 liters per hour. All of our platforms support our commercialized material sets, sand and plastics, along with their respective proprietary chemical binding agents. We develop our material sets according to the needs of our industrial and commercial customers, and we are currently in varying stages of developing new material sets, including shell molding and chromite sands, PMMA‑based plastics, ceramics, silicon carbide, tungsten carbide and cement.

Our business is divided into two principal segments: Systems and Services.

In our Systems segment, we focus on the sale, production and development of 3D printers. In addition, we sell refurbished 3D printers which were produced for and used in our Services segment and provide printers to customers

under operating lease agreements. We also provide consumables, including particulate materials and proprietary chemical binding agents, maintenance contracts and spare parts to our customers.

In our Services segment, we print on‑demand parts for our customers. We operate service centers in Germany, the United States and China. At our service centers, we create parts, molds, cores and models based on designs produced using 3D computer‑aided design, or CAD, software. Furthermore, there are customers who order casted parts directly from us. In those cases, we provide molds or models to external suppliers who then cast the parts for our customers. We believe our service center in Germany is one of the largest additive manufacturing service centers in Europe.

We sold our first 3D printer in 2002 and commenced our on‑demand parts services business in 2003. As of December 31, 2019,  we had an installed base of 188 printers worldwide, and we operated service centers in Germany, the United States and China. Our service centers in Germany and the United States each have approximately 43,000 square feet of production space. Our service center in China has approximately 26,000 square feet and approximately 15,000 square feet of production space, respectively.

Our Additive Manufacturing Technology

Our printers build or print parts from digital designs produced using 3D CAD software by successively depositing thin layers of particulate materials. A printhead passes over each layer and deposits our proprietary chemical binding agent in the selected areas where the finished product will be created.

The following is a graphical depiction illustrating our manufacturing process:

Our 3D Printers

We currently produce eight 3D printer platforms. Our 3D printers consist of a build box that includes a machine platform and a controller. Our 3D printers differ based on build box size and print speeds, but all utilize our technology and can support each of our existing material sets and each of our material sets that are currently in development. As of December 31, 2019, we had an installed base of 188 printers worldwide, which includes (i) printers in our service centers and (ii) printers which are no longer commercially available, but which we believe our customers continue to use.

The following table is a comparison of our 3D printer platforms:

Materials

Our commercialized material sets are comprised of sand and plastic particulate materials and their respective proprietary chemical binding agents. We believe these material sets are well suited for our commercial and industrial customers because these materials either (i) are commonly used in their existing manufacturing processes or (ii) match or exceed desired performance characteristics of existing materials being utilized in their manufacturing processes. Our sand material set offerings include four types of sands: (i) silica, (ii) kerphalite, (iii) zirconium oxide and (iv) chromite, with furan, inorganic, shell molding and phenol resins as proprietary chemical binding agents. Our plastics material set offering is based on Poly(methyl methacrylate), or PMMA, and Polypor B and C as the proprietary chemical binding agents.

We are currently in varying stages of development of new material sets which include the following particulate materials:

On‑demand Parts Services

At our service centers, we create parts, molds, cores and models for a variety of industrial and commercial customers based on designs produced using 3D CAD software. We receive orders directly from customers and indirectly through our sales agents.

Our service centers in Germany and the United States each have approximately 43,000 square feet of production space. On March 1, 2019, our Chinese service center moved into a new facility with more than 78,000 square feet of production space, storage and office space. In the third quarter of 2019, we decided to consolidate 3D printing to serve all customers in Europe from the German service center and restructure the voxeljet UK entity. In this course, the UK service center was closed down in the fourth quarter of 2019, and consequently the lease of the Milton Keynes facility has been terminated early and will end in May 2020. voxeljet UK will expand its sales team and will focus on selling 3D printed parts and 3D printers.   

We help our customers move from the design stage to the production stage by assisting them in evaluating the optimal design and material sets for their production needs. After printing parts, we employ a thorough cleaning, finishing, quality control review and packaging and shipping process to ensure the customer receives high‑quality and immediately‑usable parts. Based on our capacity utilization, the lead time required for us to print a part for a customer ranges from three to 21 days and is typically five business days. Due to the size of the printers’ build boxes utilized in our German service center, specifically the VX4000 printer, we are able to print more parts simultaneously on one printer than anyone else in the industry, resulting in cost‑effective and quick turnaround times for our customers’ print jobs and increased revenue and profitability for us.

Our technicians also train customers on operating, maintaining and troubleshooting our 3D printers through hands‑on experience at our German service center. Additionally, our technicians provide field support to our customers as needed. After the warranty period, we offer maintenance contracts to our customers. Those contracts include scheduled service visits where we maintain and clean the 3D printers as well as on demand visits and troubleshooting, in case of sudden problems.

Our Customers

We are in the market for industrial part production utilizing additive manufacturing and are one of the few providers of additive manufacturing solutions to industrial and commercial customers, including the foundry, automotive, heavy equipment, power fluid handling, aerospace and consumer product industries. Our mission is to re-define additive mass production. We believe we have a reputation for providing high‑quality systems and services in the marketplace with strong relationships with a number of leading multinational customers. Out of our broad customer portfolio we deal with customers including Daimler AG, BMW AG, Ford Motor Company, Volkswagen AG, Porsche SE, Evonik Industries AG as well as with other key users of additive manufacturing, and technical universities such as the ETH Zürich, and the Vaal University of Technology. Purchasers of our printers also include original equipment manufacturers, government agencies and independent service bureaus that provide rapid prototyping and manufacturing services to their customers. Many of our customers have been customers for over a decade. We also collaborate on research and development projects with a number of our automotive and technical university customers, including Daimler AG, BMW AG, Ford Motor Company, Volkswagen AG and the Technical University of Munich. As our customers integrate additive manufacturing into their production processes, they typically continue to utilize our on‑demand parts service center for a variety of reasons, including for incremental capacity and for parts printed from different material sets.

We conduct a significant portion of our business with a limited number of customers. Our top five customers represented 21%, 20% and 19% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. These customers primarily purchased 3D printers, while one of the top five customers primarily ordered printed parts. In the year ended December 31, 2019, there were no customers who accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. Sales of on‑demand parts and consumables tend to be from repeat customers that may utilize the capability of our on‑demand parts service centers for one month or longer. Sales of 3D printers are low volume and generate significant revenues, but the same customers do not necessarily buy printers in each period. Timing of customer purchases is dependent on the customer’s capital budgeting cycle, which may vary from period to period. The nature of the revenues from 3D printers does not leave us dependent upon a single or a limited number of customers. Rather, the timing of the sales can have a material effect on our period‑to‑period financial results.

Sales and Marketing

We sell our 3D printers and related consumables both through our direct sales force and with the assistance of our network of more than 20 third-party sales agents globally. Our sales organization, including our dedicated sales, service and application engineers, is responsible for worldwide sales of our 3D printers and on‑demand parts services, as well as for the management and coordination of our growing sales agent network. Our direct sales force focuses primarily on customers in Europe, North America and Asia Pacific, while our sales agents are responsible for facilitating sales in other areas of the world where we do not operate directly. We have entered into partnership agreements with each of our sales agents, which grant the sales agent the right to market our products in a specified territory on either an exclusive or non‑exclusive basis, depending on the sales agent; however, all sales contracts for our products are entered into between us and our customers. Certain of these sales agents also provide maintenance services to customers in their specified territories. Our application engineers provide professional services through pre‑sales support and assist existing customers so that they can take advantage of our latest consumables and techniques to improve part quality and machine productivity. This group also leverages our customer contacts to help identify new application opportunities that utilize our proprietary processes. As of December 31, 2019, our worldwide sales staff for systems and parts consisted of 45 employees. We also expect that our subsidiaries in Europe, North America and Asia Pacific will improve market access through local market development and allow the targeting of specific customers.

Educating our customers and raising awareness in our target markets about the many uses and benefits of our 3D printing technology is an important part of our sales process. We believe that customers who experience the efficiency gains, decreased lead times, increased design flexibility and reduced costs of 3D printing as compared to subtractive manufacturing are more likely to purchase our 3D printers and/or utilize our on‑demand parts services. We

encourage potential purchasers of our 3D printers to first utilize our on‑demand parts services so that they can experience firsthand the benefits of our 3D printing technology. We currently market our brand and our services at industry conferences, trade shows, and across various forms of digital and traditional media and plan to increasingly expand our marketing efforts in North America in conjunction with our geographic expansion to that region.

Services and Warranty

Our fully‑trained service technicians perform installations of our 3D printers. For the first year following the purchase of one of our 3D printers, we provide complimentary service and support under the statutory warranty. We also offer service contracts under which our customers can purchase maintenance and services beyond the one‑year term of the warranty. These service contracts contain varying degrees of support services and are priced accordingly. Finally, we sell spare parts which we maintain in stock to assist in providing service expeditiously to our customers. Historically, we have not experienced a high level of warranty claims.

Manufacturing and Suppliers

Manufacturing

We assemble our 3D printers at our facility in Friedberg, Germany using components sourced from distributors of standard electrical or mechanical parts, as well as from manufacturers which design custom parts tailored to the proprietary designs of our machines. We periodically review the quality and performance of our distributors and manufacturers. Upon completion of the assembly of our 3D printers, we perform tests to ensure that the printer is functioning properly before the system is shipped and again after the system is installed at the customer’s site. Starting in fiscal year 2020, we are going to assemble some of our 3D printers at our facility in China.

To provide customers with assurance regarding the quality and consistency of our systems, we obtained ISO 9001:2008 certification for our facility in Germany in 2010. ISO 9001:2008 provides a structure for a quality management system that strives for customer satisfaction, consistent quality and efficiency. In addition, there are internal benefits such as improved customer satisfaction, interdepartmental communications, work processes and customer‑and‑supplier partnerships. The ISO 9000 family of standards relates to quality management systems and is designed to help organizations ensure that they meet the needs of customers and other stakeholders.

Inventory and Suppliers

We maintain an inventory of certain parts to facilitate the timely assembly of products required by our production plan. While most components used in our 3D printers are available from multiple suppliers, certain of these components are only available from limited sources. We consider our limited‑source suppliers, including the suppliers of our printheads, to be reliable; however, the loss of one of these suppliers could result in a delay in our operations. This type of delay could require us to find and re‑qualify components supplied by one or more new vendors. Although we consider our relationships with our suppliers to be good, we continue to develop risk management plans for these critical suppliers. Regarding inventory we defined targets for raw materials as well as for work in progress. The strategy includes meeting customer expectation and demand for spare parts, wear parts as well as 3D printers with an attractive lead time.

Research and Development

We have an ongoing research and development program to develop new 3D printers and material sets and to improve and expand the capabilities of our existing 3D printers and related material sets. As of December 31, 2019, we had various active research and development projects in different stages of completion. All research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred, as the criteria set forth in IAS 38 for capitalizing such costs have not yet been met. Our development efforts are augmented by development arrangements with research institutions, customers and suppliers of material and hardware, among others.

In addition to our internally‑developed technology platforms and the related software, we have licensed the rights to intellectual property developed by third parties through licensing agreements that may obligate us to pay a license fee or royalty, typically based upon a dollar amount per unit or a percentage of the revenues generated by such products.

Our research and development expenses were € 7.2 million, € 6.3 million, and € 5.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019,  2018, and 2017, respectively.

A significant portion of our research and development expenditures has been focused upon developing proprietary systems, processes and materials, including:

We also regularly apply for research and development grants and subsidies under European and German grant rules for small and medium enterprises. The majority of these grants and subsidies are non‑refundable. We have received grants and subsidies from different authorities, including the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie), the Bavarian Research Foundation (Bayerische Forschungsstiftung) and the German Federal Foundation Environment (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt).

We expect to continue to invest significantly in research and development in the future.

Intellectual Property

We consider our proprietary technology to be important to the development, manufacture, and sale of our products and seek to protect such technology through a combination of patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. We also have in place confidentiality agreements and other contractual arrangements with our employees, consultants, customers and others.

Patents.  As of December 31, 2019, we owned or co-owned 65 issued U.S. patents and 35 pending U.S. patent applications. In addition, we own or co‑own patent rights in Europe, Asia, Brazil and Canada. In total, as of December 31,  2019 our patent portfolio consisted of over 423 patents and patent applications. Our currently issued patents will expire at different times in the future, with the earliest expiring in 2020 and the latest expiring in 2035. Our currently pending applications will generally remain in effect for 20 years from the date of the initial applications.

These patent assets are complemented by our marketing, business development and applications know‑how and our ongoing research and development efforts. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that our patents, licenses or other intellectual property rights will afford us a meaningful competitive advantage in the fast‑paced and innovative field in which we operate.

Trade Secrets.  As is true in our industry generally, the development of our products, processes and materials has involved a considerable amount of experience, manufacturing and processing know‑how and research and development techniques. We protect our proprietary processes and technologies with a blend of patent protection and trade secret protection. As part of our overall intellectual property strategy, we protect our non‑patented proprietary knowledge as trade secrets through confidentiality controls and through the use of nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements.

Licenses.    We are a party to various licenses and other arrangements that allow us to practice and improve our technology under a range of patents, patent applications and other intellectual property, including license agreements with ExOne, 3D Systems (Z Corp), Bego Medical GmbH, or Bego, and Evonik IP GmbH each described in more detail below.

In 2003, we entered into an agreement with Extrude Hone GmbH (now doing business as ExOne) related to patents and technologies using certain binders, methods and equipment for 3-D printing processes, including sand-based 3-D printing. Under the terms of this agreement, ExOne purchased an ownership share in certain patents and related technologies from us. Further, we granted ExOne certain rights to exploit these technologies and ExOne entered into an ongoing obligation to pay royalties to us. The parties also agreed to share revenues generated from any licenses granted by ExOne. The agreement states that we are permitted to use machines and provide services relating to these technologies, but not to make or sell machines utilizing these technologies without ExOne's consent, although ExOne has an obligation to consent if the machines do not compete with products engineered, manufactured or sold by ExOne or its affiliates. If we intend to sell any of the intellectual property that is the subject of this agreement, ExOne has the option to acquire it at fair market value. Similarly, ExOne has a right of first refusal regarding the purchase of any developments and improvements we make to such intellectual property and a set of six patents (including one U.S. patent) related to wax technologies, as well as the right to negotiate to receive a license to such developments and improvements. We later signed an amendment with ExOne specifically allowing us to use the subject patents for our 3D printers working with plastics in exchange for the payment of a license fee. The obligation of both parties to pay royalties under this agreement extends until the expiration of the last issued patent included in the list of transferred patent assets.

While the agreement states that our rights are limited regarding use of certain binders and sand-based casting methods in 3D printers with ExOne, we believe these limitations will not materially impact the growth of our business, as we are able to continue certain activities in compliance with the agreement and we have developed processes which do not rely upon the subject patent portfolio, associated agreements and related technologies. If needed, we will take steps to protect our ability to continue such activities including by challenging the validity or enforceability of certain provisions of the agreement. In March 2018, ExOne GmbH, a subsidiary of ExOne, notified us of their intent not to pay their annual license fees under this agreement and asserted their rights to claim damages pursuant to an alleged material breach of the agreement. We are vigorously disputing these claims, however, the outcome of this matter is uncertain.

In 2004, we entered into a non-exclusive license and sublicense agreement with Z Corp (acquired by 3D Systems in 2012), which allows us to make, use and sell 3D printing equipment for the fabrication of plastic parts utilizing organic powder binders under certain Z Corp and Massachusetts Institute of Technology patents. In return for these rights, we agreed to pay an initial license fee and ongoing tiered royalties. We later amended this agreement, expanding our permitted use of the licensed binder-jetting technology to include inorganic powder, ceramics, and concrete printing in a process that does not require post processing other than oven baking parts or liquid infiltration, but restricting us to monochromatic color configurations. The agreement extends until the expiration of the licensed patents; however, the parties may terminate the agreement under certain conditions.

In 2012, we entered into a cross licensing agreement with Bego pursuant to which each party granted to the other certain exclusive rights regarding each parties’ patents and applications directed to continuous additive manufacturing. We granted to Bego an exclusive license to market patent covered products in the field of laser sintering and other related technologies, while Bego granted to us an exclusive license to market patent covered products in the field of binder-jetting technology (other than for dental applications). We also agreed to pay to Bego a royalty and to pay a participation fee to Bego in the event that we grant any sublicenses to the technology (which, to date, we have not done). This agreement automatically terminates upon the expiration of the last patent subject to the agreement.

In March 2015, we entered into a non-exclusive technology license agreement with Evonik IP GmbH, in which voxeljet acquired a license for a 3D printing process using polymeric materials that we believe offers distinct speed and cost benefits. This powder bed fusion process allows for production of parts with thermoplastic properties. In return for these rights, we agreed to pay an upfront payment and ongoing royalties for each royalty period, subject to the payment of a fixed minimum annual royalty if higher. The agreement shall remain in force until the expiration of the last to expire patent of the licensed patents; however, either party may terminate the agreement under certain conditions.

In addition to the foregoing licenses, we have also licensed additional patents that we believe can be used to expand our material set offerings.

Trademarks.  We have secured word and figurative trademarks for voxeljet in Europe and have international (IR) applications covering the United States, Russia, Mexico and a number of countries in Asia.

Competition

Our principal competitors consist of other developers of 3D printing systems and providers of 3D printing services. These companies use a variety of additive manufacturing technologies, including:

Some of the companies that have developed and use one or more additive manufacturing technologies to compete with us include: ExOne, 3D Systems Corporation, Stratasys, Ltd., EOS GmbH and HP Inc.

These technologies, which compete for market share in the additive manufacturing industry, possess various competitive advantages and disadvantages relative to one another within key categories, including resolution, accuracy, surface quality, variety and properties of the materials they use and produce, capacity, speed, color, transparency and the ability to print multiple materials. Due to these multiple categories, we believe end-users usually make technology purchasing decisions based on the characteristics that they value most for a particular application. The competitive environment that has developed is therefore intense and dynamic, as market players often position their technologies to capture multiple vertical markets.

Despite the challenging competitive landscape, we believe that we have several competitive advantages, including the size of our build platforms, our printing speeds, the volumetric output rate of our 3D printers and the variety of qualified material sets that we offer to commercial and industrial customers.

We also compete with established subtractive manufacturers in the industrial products market. However, we believe that we are well positioned to expand our share of the industrial products market as additive manufacturing gains recognition and increases its cost effectiveness. As our technologies improve and our unit cost of production decreases, we expect to be able to better compete with subtractive manufacturing on a wide range of products, thereby expanding our addressable market.

Seasonality

Historically, our results of operations have been subject to seasonal factors. Purchases of our 3D printers often follow a seasonal pattern owing to the capital budgeting cycles of our customers. Generally, 3D printer sales are higher in our second and fourth fiscal quarters than in our first and third fiscal quarters. Sales in our Services segment generally are not affected by seasonality. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate.”

Regulatory/Environmental Matters

We are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations in Germany, as well as in the countries where our products and materials are used or sold.

Germany

Legal Requirements for Manufacturing Sites

Emissions Control Law.  We do require a permit granted under the Federal Emissions Control Act (Bundes‑Immissionsschutzgesetz, or BImSchG), as we use resins (Harze) to create models for customers. Therefore, the permit was granted for the buildings “Halle 1” “and Halle 2” to us in December 2013 by the District Administration (Landratsamt) of Aichach-Friedberg. The permit was granted under the condition (Auflage), that the amount of resins

processed by us does not exceed 25 kilograms per hour. For the building “Halle 3”, the permit was granted in July 2016 by the District Administration (Landratsamt) of Aichach- Friedberg. The permit was granted under the condition (Auflage), that the amount of resins processed by us does not exceed 10 kilograms per hour. Facilities that are subject to BImSchG are required to comply with the current state of the art (Stand der Technik) in emissions reduction and safety technology. We are therefore supervised by the Landesamt für Umweltschutz (LfU) and as well by the District Administration (Landratsamt)  of Aichach-Friedberg and have regularly give full reports about the emissions in our facilities.

Production, Possession and Handling of Waste and Dangerous Goods. Our business activities result in the generation, possession and handling of waste, including hazardous waste. Under the German Act on Recycling (Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz, or KrWG), the generation, possession and handling of waste is subject to several obligations, depending, among other things, on the waste concerned. As the producer (Erzeuger) and possessor (Besitzer) of waste, we are generally responsible for the proper handling of this waste.

Section 50 of the KrWG requires producers, possessors, collectors and transporters of waste and disposal firms to verify to the competent authority proper disposal of hazardous waste (gefährliche Abfälle). Whether a certain substance qualifies as hazardous waste is determined according to the German Ordinance on the European Waste List (Verordnung über das Europäische Abfallverzeichnis).

We further comply with the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, which is accepted as an international guideline for the safe transportation or shipment of dangerous goods or hazardous materials by water.

We also comply with the Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of December 18, 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).

We have trained and educated an employee to serve as our risk prevention officer (Gefahrgutbeauftragter). The risk prevention officer ensures that we comply with specific regulations and provisions when dangerous goods are shipped. In addition, we have two “Authorized Persons” (Beauftragte Personen), who are equally responsible for the risk prevention, and who are advised by the risk prevention officer. All of these persons (risk prevention officer and the authorized persons) do regularly take part in external trainings.

Legal Requirements Related to Products

Product Safety.  Our products are used in a wide range of industries. As some of our products may be used directly by customers, we are subject to the German Product Safety Act (Produktsicherheitsgesetz, or ProdSG).  The ProdSG is mainly based on Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of December 3, 2001 on general product safety (GPSD). Through the ProdSG and its predecessors, the GPSD was transformed into German law. With the ProdSG of November 8, 2011 and the ninth regulation to the ProdSG as amended (Neunte Verordnung zum Produktsicherheitsgesetz  (Maschinenverordnung)), the German legislature also transformed, among other European Directives, the Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of May 17, 2006 on machinery into German law. The ProdSG applies whenever products are made available on the market, exhibited or used for the first time in the context of a commercial activity, but only in the absence of other legal provisions that provide for corresponding or more far‑reaching provisions.

Under the ProdSG, a product may be made available on the market only if it complies with specific regulations for such product, or, in the absence of such specific regulations, if its intended or foreseeable use does not put the health and safety of persons at risk. In essence, under the ProdSG manufacturers may only place "safe" products on the market.

In addition to compliance with this safety requirement, if products are made available to consumers, manufacturers must provide consumers with the necessary information to enable them to assess the risks inherent in such product where such risks are not immediately obvious without adequate warnings.  In the event of potential product issues, manufacturers might be under an obligation to take precautions against such risks (for example, withdraw products from the market, inform consumers, recall products which have already been supplied to consumers, etc.). If manufacturers or distributors of consumer products discover that a product is potentially dangerous or unsafe, they must generally notify the competent authorities and, if necessary, cooperate with them. Unsafe products may also be listed in an EU-wide publicly-accessible database such as RAPEX or ICSMS.

Occupational Health and Safety Requirements.  Where the working environment may pose threats to employees, occupational health and safety laws are applicable. German law on occupational safety is heavily influenced by the requirements of EU law. The central rules on occupational safety in Germany are contained in the Act on Occupational Safety (Arbeitsschutzgesetz, or ArbSchG), which requires employers to provide for their employees’ safety. This general obligation is put into effect through several ordinances (Rechtsverordnungen) under the ArbSchG, which are defined in technical guidelines. One central element is the Workplaces Ordinance (Arbeitsstättenverordnung), which contains various regulations on workplace conditions relating to, for example, ventilation, temperature and illumination.

In addition, we are under surveillance of the employers' liability insurance association (Berufsgenossenschaft). All companies in Germany are obliged to be member of the Berufsgenossenschaft, who is monitoring the companies regarding compliance with the Health and Safety Requirements and who in general covers liability for accidents at work and occupational diseases.

Potential Liability for Products and Environmental Losses

Our business activities are such that product liability and liability for environmental damage are possible. Under general rules of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, or BGB), fault‑based compensation (Schadensersatz) is to be paid for breach of contract or unlawful infringements of legally protected rights. This obligation does not only apply to our own acts but may potentially extend to behavior of individuals that work or undertake tasks for us under Sections 278, and 831 of BGB.

In addition, we may be strictly liable (i.e., liable regardless of our fault), as a Producer under the Product Liability Act (Produkthaftungsgesetz, or ProdHaftG), for damages caused by a defective product. “Producer” generally means any participant in the production process, the importer of the defective product, any person putting a name, trademark or other distinguishing feature on the product, and any person supplying a product whose actual producer cannot be identified. A product is “defective” when it does not provide the safety which a person is entitled to expect when taking all circumstances into account, including among other things, the presentation of the product, the use to which it could reasonably be expected that the product would be put and the time when the product was put into circulation.

Additionally, in case of damage to persons or property caused by our facility, we may be strictly liable under the Act on Liability for Environmental Damage (Umwelthaftungsgesetz).  In case of environmental damages to species, natural habitats, water or soil we may be liable under the Environmental Damage Act (Umweltschadensgesetz). The Environmental Damage Act only applies if German Federal or State Legislation does not specify the prevention and restoration of environmental damage or does not comply with this Act in its requirements.

Worldwide

Our operations and the activities of our employees, contractors and agents around the world are subject to the laws and regulations of numerous countries, including the United States. These laws and regulations include data privacy requirements, labor relations laws, tax laws, anti‑competition regulations, prohibitions on payments to governmental officials, federal and state environmental regulations, import and trade restrictions and export requirements. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against our officers, our employees, or us and may result in prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could also result in prohibitions on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries and could materially damage our reputation, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business and our operating results.

Our operations (particularly in those countries with developing economies) are also subject to risks of violations of laws prohibiting improper payments and bribery, including the European Union Anti‑Corruption Act, U.K. Bribery Act, U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar regulations in other jurisdictions. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors, and agents may take actions in violation of such policies. Any such violations, even if prohibited by our policies, could subject us to civil or criminal penalties or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.