Table of Contents

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

​

Commission file number 001-33404

(303) 531-0516

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐  No ☒

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant at June 30, 2021 was approximately $159,632,860. Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of February 10, 2022 was 35,371,336 shares.

Documents incorporated by reference:  specified portions of Westwater Resources, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to its 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

WESTWATER RESOURCES, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

2

Table of Contents

3

Table of Contents

USE OF NAMES

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, “WWR”, “Westwater”, “Corporation”, or the “Company” refer to Westwater Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company changed its name from “Uranium Resources, Inc.” to “Westwater Resources, Inc.” effective August 21, 2017.

CURRENCY

The accounts of the Company are maintained in U.S. dollars. All dollar amounts referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars.

​

​

4

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed in this report are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projections or estimates contained herein. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, strategic goals of the business, expected permits and regulatory approvals, statements regarding the construction of the Coosa Plant and the expected schedule of completion and construction costs, statements regarding the operation of the Coosa Plant and the anticipated output products and quantities, statements regarding the adequacy of funding, liquidity, and access to capital, any future drilling or production from the Company’s properties, including the expected mining operations at the Coosa Deposit, expected mineralization at the Coosa Deposit, expected date of the technical report for the Coosa Deposit and the expected commencement date of drilling at the Coosa Deposit, and the Company’s anticipated cash burn rate and capital requirements. Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “forecast,” “potential,” “intend,” “continue,” “project” and variations of these words, comparable words and similar expressions generally indicate forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, among others:

5

Table of Contents

For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” below in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that these statements will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in the statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

STATEMENT REGARDING THIRD PARTY INFORMATION

Certain information provided in this report has been provided to us by the third parties or is publicly available information published or filed with applicable securities regulatory bodies, including the SEC and SEDAR. WWR has not verified, and is not in a position to verify, and expressly disclaims any responsibility for, the accuracy, completeness or fairness of such third-party information and refers the reader to the information publicly published or filed by the third parties for additional information.

​

6

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

We believe that our broad base of mining and processing and manufacturing expertise from graphite, base and precious metals to energy materials is one of our key competitive advantages. We also believe that Westwater possesses a unique combination of battery-materials knowledge and extensive project-execution experience, coupled with decades of capital markets expertise which makes our business a powerful presence in the new energy marketplace. We intend to advance the Company’s project towards production, while prudently managing our cash and liquidity position for financial flexibility.

KEY BUSINESS AND CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS IN 2021

Graphite Processing Pilot Programs

During 2021, the Company completed its pilot program at Dorfner Anzaplan’s facilities near Amberg, Germany, as well as at facilities in Frankfurt, Germany, Chicago, Illinois and Buffalo, New York. The combined effort at these facilities produced approximately 13 metric tonnes of Westwater’s three battery-grade graphite products: ULTRA-PMG™, ULTRA-CSPG™ and ULTRA-DEXDG™, which were previously produced at a bench scale.

As of December 31, 2021, Westwater had produced through the pilot program:

Westwater undertook its pilot program operations to inform and enhance design work for the Coosa Plant and to produce products for testing by potential customers. The information from the pilot program was incorporated into the DFS. Due to market interest and demand, we are focusing on the production of ULTRA-CSPG™ and SPG Fines during Phase I of the Coosa Plant.

Coosa Plant Site Selection

On June 22, 2021, AGP entered into incentive agreements with the State of Alabama and local municipalities for the siting of the Coosa Plant in Coosa County, Alabama.  The incentive agreements provide certain tax credits and incentives under the Alabama Jobs Act in connection with the construction of the processing facility. The estimated tax credits and incentives pursuant to the incentive agreements are estimated by the State of Alabama at approximately $36 million.  However, our ability to realize the tax credits and incentives is dependent upon actual capital invested, creating and maintaining jobs in Alabama, and the generation of future taxable income in Alabama.

On July 23, 2021, AGP entered into a land lease with the Lake Martin Area Industrial Development Authority, providing AGP rights to approximately 70 acres to construct and operate the Coosa Plant.  The lease has a term of 10-years, a nominal lease payment, and transfer of title to AGP at the end of the lease term.  Further, the lease provides AGP the option to purchase the land for a nominal amount during the term of the lease.  At lease inception, the Company estimated the fair value of the land to be approximately $1.4 million.

8

Table of Contents

Definitive Feasibility Study on the Coosa Plant

On October 11, 2021, the Company announced the results of the DFS pertaining to Phase I of its Coosa Plant.  The Company intends to develop the Coosa Plant to purify natural graphite concentrates and to produce battery ready graphite products in two phases.  As of the date of the DFS, the capital costs of Phase I of the Coosa Plant are estimated at $202 million.  Beginning in the first half of 2023, the Coosa Plant is expected to begin producing from purchased feedstock from outside sources until at least 2028, after which the Company expects to produce graphite feedstock from its Coosa Deposit.  After processing and purification, the Company expects approximately 7,500 mt per year of two products to be commercially available in the following quantities:

Also on October 11, 2021, the Company announced a plan and design for Phase II of the Coosa Plant at a pre-feasibility study level (“PFS”). As of the date of the DFS, the PFS for Phase II of the Coosa Plant estimates additional capital costs of $464 million, and after processing and purification, the Company expects approximately 32,400 mt per year of two products will be available in the following quantities:

The Company intends to initiate a definitive feasibility study for Phase II upon, or before, the completion and commissioning of Phase I of the Coosa Plant.

Approval of Construction of Phase I

On October 11, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors approved estimated expenditures of $202 million to execute the construction and commissioning plan for Phase I of the Coosa Plant. 

Construction Progress on Phase I of the Coosa Plant

On October 13, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of two buildings by its subsidiary AGP that total 90,000 sq. ft. in size, to support the development of the Coosa Plant.  These buildings will be used for administrative offices, a laboratory, and warehousing space, and each are adjacent to the Coosa Plant site. The purchase of these two buildings avoids the need for certain construction activities.  During the fourth quarter of 2021, Westwater began design and construction activities related to the future administrative offices for the Coosa Plant.

In November 2021, Westwater established the construction management process and team for Phase I of the Coosa Plant. Key partners in the team were hired:  Fite Construction as the construction manager; and Samuels Engineering for engineering and procurement. Construction activities began in December 2021.   We are working to secure other contractors and have focused on ordering specialized equipment that have long lead times from manufacturers that were identified in, and were part of, the DFS.

9

Table of Contents

Vanadium Target Identification

In late November 2018, Westwater announced the discovery of a concentration of vanadium mineralization at several locations in the graphitic schists at the Coosa Deposit. Westwater subsequently commenced the first of a four-phase exploration program designed to determine the extent, character and quality of the vanadium mineralization at the Coosa Deposit. The first phase demonstrated widespread positive values for vanadium that extended beyond the graphite deposit.

OVERVIEW OF THE BATTERY GRAPHITE INDUSTRY

Graphite is the name given to a common form of the element carbon. Occurring naturally as a mineral in deposits around the world, graphite is used in many industrial applications. These end uses take advantage of graphite’s natural characteristics, which include high lubricity, high resistance to corrosion, ability to withstand high temperatures while remaining highly stable, and excellent conductivity of heat and electricity.

In recent years, graphite has become an essential component in the production of all types of electrical storage batteries. Graphite’s role will continue to be important as demand for these batteries increases and with the world’s growing electric-vehicle and energy-storage needs. Natural battery-ready graphite products are derived from flake graphite that has been transformed through a series of specialty downstream processes into various battery graphite products. These processes include, but are not limited to:

Natural flake graphite is increasingly supplanting the use of synthetic graphite in battery applications, for cost and performance reasons. Through a series of sophisticated and precise processing steps, flake-graphite concentrates are transformed into high-value end products for the battery industry. Coated spherical purified graphite is used as graphite anode or anode active material in lithium-ion batteries.

The global battery market consumed 217,000 tonnes of natural graphite in 2020 (Roskill, 2020). The greatest share of this market is made up of four battery-market segments that require advanced battery-grade graphite products:

10

Table of Contents

All of these batteries use graphite as a critical, non-substitutable constituent. According to Roskill, batteries accounted for an estimated 290,000 tonnes of natural and synthetic graphite consumption in 2020, and was growing at a CAGR of 21.3% over the previous 10 years (Roskill, 2020). Based on Roskill’s base case scenario, this rate of growth could continue over the next decade, with graphite consumption in batteries reaching 1,800,000 tonnes in 2030, of which over 1,200,000 tonnes is projected to be natural graphite. According to Benchmark, spherical graphite demand is expected to increase to approximately 2,500,000 tonnes per year in 2035, compared to a forecasted supply in 2035 of approximately 500,000 tonnes per year.

Competition between natural and synthetic graphite is expected to continue in lithium-ion batteries with price, performance and availability affecting the choice between them.  Common precursor materials in the production of synthetic graphite come from either petroleum needle coke, or coal needle coke. However, synthetic graphite and natural graphite blends are becoming a popular choice for EV applications to optimize performance and cost by taking advantage of each graphite attribute such as cycle life, energy density and cost.  Synthetic graphite consumption by anode manufacturers is expected to grow because of the concentration of the industry in China; however, natural flake graphite demand is forecast to grow at a higher rate because of natural graphite’s performance and cost efficiencies.

In addition, natural graphite flake costs and purification costs in China have increased due to environmental costs (hydrofluoric acid handling cost).  In fact, China has become one of the major importers for natural graphite flake relying upon less expensive African sources.  China also poses a geopolitical risk particularly to EU and US regions.

Overall battery consumption is rising at an accelerated growth rate due to recent and robust developments in electric-automobile markets, personal electronic devices, electrical grid storage, and an enabling technology for wind and solar power installation. The global shift towards low- and zero-emissions vehicles and power sources will continue to drive increasing demand for graphite-battery materials for the foreseeable future. Recent developments in this sector include:

11

Table of Contents

A significant challenge for battery manufacturers is that the primary source of battery-grade graphite is from China, presenting the global battery industry with significant risks, including supply chain management risks, economic risks and environmental unsustainability. Also, critical domestic production is absent in the United States. A Presidential Executive Order signed September 30, 2020 includes graphite on its list of minerals critical to the safety and security of the United States. With little current domestic natural graphite production of any kind, the United States is presently required to source most of its battery graphite from China. On February 24, 2021, the President signed an Executive Order that seeks to provide for more resilient supply chains to revitalize and rebuild domestic manufacturing capacity and maintain America’s competitive edge in research and development. The President’s declaration asked the Secretary of Energy, as part of larger study involving several branches of the United States government, to submit a report identifying risks to the supply chain for high-capacity batteries including those that power electric vehicles. On June 8, 2021, the White House released a response to the findings of this study in support of securing an end-to-end domestic supply chain for advanced batteries, including investment in domestic production and processing of critical minerals.  Key recommendations in the June 8, 2021 release include, among other things, providing funding and financial incentives to encourage consumer adoption of electric vehicles, providing financing to support advanced battery production, and investing in the development of next generation batteries.

Westwater has developed graphite-purification technology and advanced product-development processes to meet the demands of potential customers for battery-grade graphite materials. Westwater is developing methodologies and facilities to produce high-purity, battery-grade graphite products at its Coosa Plant. These products are designed to address all major battery sectors. In addition, the processes we intend to use are environmentally sustainable and permittable in the United States, where a robust regulatory environment complements our core values to reliably deliver safe, well-made products to our customers.

OVERVIEW OF THE VANADIUM INDUSTRY

Vanadium is a lightweight metal used in the construction industry, in high strength steel alloys, and in some large grid storage batteries. A majority of annual vanadium consumption is utilized by the steel industry, where additions of the metal to conventional steel materials adds strength and corrosion resistance. Importantly for Westwater, demand for vanadium flow batteries is increasing as solar and wind power generators seek to make their installations more reliable electricity providers.  

Currently, the majority of all vanadium is produced in South Africa, China and Russia. There is no significant production of vanadium currently in the United States.

COMPETITION

In the production and marketing of graphite, there are a number of producing entities globally, some of which are government controlled and several of which have significant capitalization. For instance, approximately 80% of natural graphite global supply comes from China.

With respect to sales of graphite, the Company expects to compete primarily based on price. We intend to market graphite directly to users of the product. We are in direct competition with supplies available from various sources worldwide. We compete with multiple graphite exploration, development and production companies.

WESTWATER’S COOSA PROJECT

Coosa Plant

On June 22, 2021, AGP entered into incentive agreements with the State of Alabama and local municipalities for the siting of the Coosa Plant near Kellyton, Alabama. The incentive agreements provide certain tax credits and incentives under the Alabama Jobs Act in connection with the construction of the Coosa Plant.

On July 23, 2021, AGP executed a land lease with the Lake Martin Area Industrial Development Authority, providing AGP rights to approximately 70 acres to construct and operate the Coosa Plant. The lease has a term of 10 years,

12

Table of Contents

a nominal lease payment, and transfer of title to AGP at the end of the lease term. Further, the lease provides AGP the option to purchase the land for a nominal amount during the term of the lease.

On October 13, 2021, AGP completed the purchase of two buildings that total approximately 90,000 sq. ft. to support the development of the Coosa Plant.  These buildings will be used for administrative offices, a laboratory, and warehousing space, and each are adjacent to the Coosa Plant. 

Westwater plans to develop the Coosa Plant in two phases (Phases I and II).

Phase I: Beginning in the first half of 2023, the Coosa Plant is expected to produce approximately 7,500 mt of two products, ULTRA-CSPG™, and SPG Fines, which is a precursor product for ULTRA-PMG™.  After processing and purification, the two products are expected to be available in the following quantities:

●ULTRA-CSPG™:  3,700 mt per year

●SPG Fines:3,800 mt per year

Phase II: Upon completion of Phase II, after processing and purification, approximately 32,400 mt of two products are expected to be available in the following quantities:

●ULTRA-CSPG™:  15,800 mt per year

●SPG Fines:  16,600 mt per year

Construction activities for Phase I of the Coosa Plant began in the fourth quarter of 2021 and construction is expected to be completed in the first half of 2023. The Company intends to initiate a definitive feasibility study for Phase II upon, or before, the completion of Phase I.

Purification and Post-Processing Activities

The purification of the graphite concentrate at the Coosa Plant is expected to be performed using a proprietary, patent pending purification process that was developed and tested during our pilot program by Dorfner Anzaplan and other engineering consultants. Once the graphite is purified to a minimum graphite carbon content of 99.95%, we will then process it through a combination of sizing, shaping, spheronization, classification and coating to the advanced graphite products we intend to sell.

The Company has developed a new method for the purification of graphite concentrate. The process uses a combination of technologies including a caustic bake, acid leach and thermal finishing, a process that allows for a smaller and more sustainable environmental footprint than that of a hydrofluoric acid leaching system as used by other graphite processing companies.   This unique application developed by Westwater is the subject of patent applications that have been filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

We intend to purchase readily available graphite flake from a qualified supplier, for which a procurement contract is currently in place, to serve as plant feedstock for the Coosa Plant while the Coosa Deposit is being evaluated, permitted, and developed for future mining operations. Development of a mine at the Coosa Deposit, planned for start-up in 2028, will serve as an in-house source of graphite feedstock and will provide in-house QA/QC for raw-material inputs.

Description of the Coosa Deposit

Westwater acquired Alabama Graphite in 2018 as part of a strategic decision to refocus the Company to supply battery manufacturers with low-cost, high-quality, and high-margin graphite products. As a result of that business transaction, Westwater became the owner of the Coosa Deposit, located near Rockford, Alabama, 50 miles southeast of Birmingham.

13

Table of Contents

The Coosa Deposit is located at the southern end of the Appalachian Mountain range, in Coosa County, Alabama. The Coosa Deposit is located in an area that has been a past producer of graphite, utilizing a geology trend spanning tens of thousands of acres, known as the “Alabama Graphite Belt.”

The Coosa Deposit is comprised of approximately 41,965 acres of privately-owned mineral rights that the Company holds under a long-term lease.

The Coosa Deposit is hosted in high-grade metamorphic rocks. Graphitic material is present in two types of schist, a quartz-graphite schist that generally has grades greater than 1% Cg and a quartz-biotite-graphite-schist that has grades generally less than 1% Cg. The uppermost 60-100 feet of the graphite-bearing rocks have been weathered and oxidized such that they could be easily mined by simple excavation equipment without any blasting. As currently defined, mining will mainly be centered on these weathered units.

Prior to the acquisition of Alabama Graphite by Westwater, a mineral resource estimate for the Coosa Deposit, as set forth in a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) was prepared by Alabama Graphite. This assessment was prepared and published in accordance with the National Instrument 43-101 Standard of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) on Number 27, 2015. As noted, during 2021, Westwater has continued its exploration program to further investigate the size and extent of both graphite and vanadium mineral concentrations at the Coosa Deposit drilling 54 holes totaling 4,461 feet drilled. Westwater anticipates completing its exploration program during the first quarter of 2022.  Following the completion of its exploration program on the Coosa Deposit, Westwater intends to complete a technical report in accordance with subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K – Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (“S-K 1300”). The new S-K 1300 requirements of the SEC are similar to NI 43-101, but not identical.  The results of the technical report are expected by the end of 2022.

Mining Method

The Coosa Deposit is expected to be mined by conventional small-scale open-pit mining methods.

Concentrate Plant

Mineralized material from the Coosa Deposit is projected to have an average grade of 3.2% Cg, and is expected to contain impurities consisting of quartz, muscovite, iron oxides and calcite. Most of the impurities are present on the surfaces of the graphite flakes and can be easily removed during a metallurgical process known as flotation. Flotation processing maximizes the removal of these impurities while avoiding degradation of graphite flakes.

Further development work at the Coosa Deposit is expected to result in the design and a construction of a milling and concentration plant.

Products and Business Development

The Company is working to develop products for potential major battery markets. Based on discussions with potential customers, Westwater will focus on the production of ULTRA-CSPG™ and SPG fines during Phase I of the Coosa Plant and expects to evaluate the production of additional products in Phase II, subject to market demand and customer interest.

The Company plans to focus on several different battery manufacturers, including lithium-ion batteries, lead-acid batteries, alkaline batteries, and primary-lithium batteries. The Company has initiated discussions with several battery manufacturers (including automobile manufacturers), with the goal of executing multi-year supply agreements. To date, the Company has executed Non-Disclosure Agreements with potential customers and placed test samples with certain potential customers. On November 17, 2021, the Company announced that it signed a letter of intent to sell 125-250 metric tons of ULTRA-CSPG™ for lithium-ion batteries in 2023 with an option to sell an additional 16,000 metric tons in 2025.  This letter of intent is subject to the commissioning and operation of a pilot plant and a full-scale plant by the counter-party, the Company meeting certain quality and packaging specifications, and customary conditions.

14

Table of Contents

Regulation

Graphite extraction and processing is regulated by the federal and state governments. Compliance with such regulations has a material effect on the economics of our operations and the timing of project development. Our primary regulatory costs have been, and are expected to relate to, obtaining licenses and operating permits from federal and state agencies before the commencement of production activities, as well as the cost for maintaining compliance with licenses and permits once they have been issued. The current environmental and technical regulatory requirements for the graphite extraction and processing industry are well established.  However, the regulatory process can make permitting difficult and timing unpredictable.

U.S. regulations pertaining to graphite extraction and processing may evolve in the U.S. However, at this time we do not anticipate any adverse impact from these regulations that would be unique to our operations.

Coosa Deposit

Graphite mining and processing in Alabama requires various permits, including those for any emissions to air, water, or other aspects of the environment.   Permits may be required from the State of Alabama, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Army Corps of Engineers, and other State and Federal Agencies as identified in the Company’s DFS.  Specifically for the mine, permits may be required in accordance with the Alabama Surface Mining Act of 1969, which is administrated by the Alabama Department of Labor (“DoL”). DoL issues mining permits, ensures that mine sites are properly bonded for reclamation purposes, and makes periodic inspections. The Company is currently in the process of determining the requirements for posting surety or negotiable bonds related to the area to be disturbed.  Future mining operations at the Coosa Deposit may be subject to the US National Environmental Policy Act process, with potential review by various federal agencies that may include US Environmental Protection Agency, the Army Corp of Engineers, and others.

In Alabama, any surface or groundwater withdrawals are managed through the Alabama Water Use Reporting Program. The Alabama Water Resources Act and associated regulations establish the requirements for water withdrawals. The process begins with the submittal of an application form called a “Declaration of Beneficial Use” and other required information to the Office of Water Resources (“OWR”) within the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs. Once application information is reviewed and determined to be complete, OWR will issue a Certificate of Use (“COU”) that lists the applicant’s name and information concerning all registered surface and/or groundwater withdrawal points and their withdrawal information. Entities with a capacity to withdraw more than 100,000 gallons per day are required to register with OWR and obtain a COU. The COU certifies that proposed water use will not interfere with an existing water use and is beneficial.

Coosa Plant

For construction and operations of the Coosa Plant, the Company is required to obtain permits related to air emissions, water discharge, storm water drainage, and possibly other regulated waste.  On January 31, 2022, Westwater announced that it has received its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) construction stormwater permit, which is required to commence site grading for the Coosa Plant. The NPDES permit has been issued by the State of Alabama under NPDES to ensure Westwater’s construction efforts comply with the Federal Clean Water Act as it relates to regulated disturbances and any stormwater runoff from the Coosa Plant site. The NDPES permit, when coupled with the Company’s best Management Practices, allows Westwater to commence site grading activities at the Coosa Plant.  

In the fourth quarter of 2021, we submitted our air emission permit application for a synthetic minor source operating permit to Alabama Department of Environmental Management (“ADEM”).  The minor source air emission permit will allow the Company to begin vertical construction at the Coosa Plant site, and operate in compliance with the Federal Clean Air Act.  The Company expects ADEM to complete its review and issue the air emissions permit during the first half of 2022.

15

Table of Contents

The Company is also required to obtain a Surface Indirect Discharge permit, which will allow the Company to utilize the municipal water treatment facility for wastewater discharges from the Coosa Plant.  This permit is expected to be applied for and received in 2022.  

CORE VALUES AND ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (“ESG”) CONSIDERATIONS

Westwater operates according to its core values which incorporates ESG principles:

The Company works to be a good corporate citizen and to safeguard our employees, operations, neighbors and local communities where our employees and stakeholders live and work.

As these core values apply to our daily work, ESG criteria are applied to our decisions and actions.  Further, Westwater intends to report its sustainability in accordance with the applicable guidelines established by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”).  The SASB is an independent, private sector standards-setting organization dedicated to enhancing the efficiency of the capital markets by fostering high-quality disclosure of material sustainability information.

Environmental Criteria and Actions

The DFS for Phase I of the Coosa Plant was completed in October 2021. As part of the DFS, we have defined the raw material inputs, energy inputs, product streams, and waste streams, including air, water, solids and heat, for processing our graphite into battery products.  Integrated into these input and output streams, we are defining methods of minimizing impacts to our environment, including:

Greenhouse gas emissions: Estimates are being quantified and are expected to be finalized through detailed design work.  Operations for Phase I of the Coosa Plant are expected to begin during the first half of 2023.  At that time, Westwater will begin monitoring, measuring, and continuous improvement efforts related to its greenhouse gas emissions.  

Air quality: Estimates are being quantified and are expected to be finalized through detailed design work.

Energy consumption: Estimates are being quantified and are expected to be finalized through detailed design work.

16

Table of Contents

Wastewater management: We expect that the Coosa Plant will not have surface water connections to waters of the United States, nor are there any such jurisdictional waters of the United States at the Coosa Plant.  Westwater plans to pretreat the wastewater from the Coosa Plant through recycling, neutralizing and filtering to ensure it meets local wastewater disposal requirements.  Estimates are being quantified and are expected to be finalized through detailed design work.

Social Criteria and Actions

Westwater has a strong history in social license.  The Company has spent the last eight years providing scholarships to family members of the Cebolleta and Juan Tafoya Land Grants in New Mexico.  We have supported this scholarship effort over the years to ensure that young people are afforded an opportunity to attend colleges and universities.  As a result of this work, students in Veterinary Medicine, Mining Engineering, Nursing, Pharmacology, Criminal Justice and Business Management have been able to further their education.

As part of our Coosa Project design and analysis we are evaluating community needs, with input from the local stakeholders, and our ability to satisfy them – whether in education, infrastructure, or in other ways applicable to community needs.  Through the Alabama Industrial Training (“AIDT”) program, the Company is eligible to receive a cash reimbursement for the design of a customized training plan and process for recruitment, screening, and training new employees. In addition to the cash reimbursement for training, AIDT offers in-kind services, which includes items such as assistance with a pre-employment selection system, maintenance assessments, safety assistance and training, and robotic and programable logic controller automation training.  We seek to understand and minimize negative impacts to all of our stakeholders.  During 2021, Westwater has held a number of “townhall” meetings with the local community in Coosa County, Alabama, to maintain open and transparent communication as well as to hear and address any concerns of the community.  Westwater team members also hold memberships in the Coosa Riverkeepers and the Lake Martin Watch community group.

Westwater Team and Culture (Human Capital)

Our team and culture are keys to our success. Management aims to foster a diverse, equitable and inclusive culture.  We believe that a diverse workforce provides different viewpoints on business strategy, risk and innovation. We are committed to fostering solid relationships with all members of our workforce based on trust, treating workers fairly and providing them with safe and healthy working conditions. Our team is defined by a commitment to our mission, vision, and values, which includes providing a great place to work for teammates, being a good neighbor in the communities where we work and live, and being a good steward for our investors.

Westwater’s Board of Directors and management team has focused on hiring, succession planning and talent development to produce a strong and stable team. To that end, after a comprehensive search process that yielded many highly qualified candidates, Westwater hired Chad M. Potter as Westwater’s Chief Operating Officer on August 2, 2021. On February 7, 2022, following the announced retirement of Christopher M. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Board of Directors elected Mr. Potter President and Chief Executive Officer effective February 26, 2022.  Mr. Potter is a proven operations leader, whose unique skills and experience will be instrumental in leading Westwater and its subsidiaries through the construction, development, and future operation the Coosa Project. The addition of Mr. Potter will help position Westwater’s American-made battery graphite operations as best in class with a focus on safety, quality, integrity, and the protection of our environment.

Further, on May 10, 2021, after completing a comprehensive search process, Westwater hired Steven M. Cates as Westwater’s Chief Accounting Officer and Controller.  Mr. Cates is a proven financial manager whose skills and experience will be instrumental in this stage of anticipated growth and value creation at Westwater.

As of December 31, 2021, approximately 15 people were employed at Westwater.  

Consistent with our core value of safety for each other, Westwater offers employment benefits including medical insurance, paid time off, sick leave, retirement plans for all teammates, and a bonus structure at all salaried levels of the organization. Additionally, we have a history of supporting the professional development of members of our workforce

17

Table of Contents

including financial support to those wishing to obtain advance degrees, and leadership seminars and training. We have, to date, provided key financial support that resulted in college degrees for three of our employees, or about 10% of our workforce.

Governance Criteria and Factors

Board of Directors

The Company’s business and affairs are overseen by the Board pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”). Members of the Board are kept informed of the Company’s business through discussions with the President and Chief Executive Officer and key members of management, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in Board and Committee meetings. All members of the Board are elected annually by the stockholders.

Regular attendance at Board meetings and the Annual Meeting is expected of each director. Our Board held 15 meetings during 2021. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of Board and applicable Committee meetings (held during the period that such director served) in 2021. The independent directors met in executive session at several of the Board meetings held in 2021. All of the directors at the time attended the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

The Company’s governing documents allow the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to be filled by the same or different individuals. This approach allows the Board flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be separate or combined based upon the Company’s needs and the Board’s assessment of the Company’s leadership from time to time. Currently, Mr. Cryan serves as Chairman and Mr. Jones serves as Chief Executive Officer. Effective February 26, 2022, Mr. Cryan will become Executive Chairman of the Company.

Safety and Sustainability Committee (previously the Health, Safety, and Environmental Committee)

We have methods in place to ensure we do our job to integrate and govern ESG work in our business.  We have a Safety and Sustainability Committee reporting directly to the entire Board of Directors of Westwater.  The Safety and Sustainability Committee held one meeting in 2021.  On May 21, 2021, the former Health, Safety and Environmental Committee was renamed by the Board as the Safety and Sustainability Committee, and a new charter was adopted that reads, in part:

The Committee’s primary purposes are to:

18

Table of Contents

We have direct experience in managing ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems (“EMS”). These systems are designed to provide for reliable performance in sustainable management of businesses.  We are committed to the continual improvement of the EMS, according to compliance obligations, by following the principles and requirement of ISO 14001.  After the completion of our Phase I DFS, management has designed ISO 14001 based management systems to facilitate and govern our environmental performance.  This effort includes the establishment of a preliminary set of metrics for measuring that performance.

Audit Committee

We have a separately-designated Audit Committee composed solely of independent directors. The Audit Committee held four meetings in 2021.

The Audit Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2021. The Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in setting the compensation of the Company’s directors and executive officers and administering and implementing the Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. See Item 11. Executive Compensation in this annual report for further discussion of the Compensation Committee’s roles and responsibilities as well as the Company’s compensation philosophy.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting during 2021, and its duties and responsibilities are to:

19

Table of Contents

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board identifies director candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other directors, our stockholders, members of management and third parties. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not distinguish between nominees recommended by our stockholders and those recommended by other parties. Any stockholder recommendation must be sent to the Secretary of Westwater Resources, Inc. at 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112, and must include detailed background information regarding the suggested candidate that demonstrates how the individual meets the Board membership criteria discussed below. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to consult with or retain advisors or search firms to assist in the identification of qualified director candidates.

As part of the identification process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account each candidate’s business and professional skills, experience serving in management or on the board of directors of companies similar to the Company, financial literacy, independence, personal integrity and judgment. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will, in connection with its assessment and recommendation of candidates for director, consider diversity (including, but not limited to, gender, race, ethnicity, age, experience and skills) and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the then-current and anticipated future needs of the Board and the Company, and to maintain a balance of perspectives, qualifications, qualities and skills on the Board. The Board does not have a formal diversity policy for directors. However, the Board is committed to an inclusive membership. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek candidates that have different qualities and experiences at different times in order to maximize the aggregate experience, qualities and strengths of the Board members, nominees for each election or appointment of directors will be evaluated using a substantially similar process. Incumbent directors who are being considered for re-nomination are re-evaluated both on their performance as directors and their continued ability to meet the required qualifications.

Board Diversity

Westwater’s Board of Directors is comprised of four independent directors, and currently has a 50/50 gender representation of the independent directors.  In 2021, Westwater was acknowledged by, and received an award, from BoardConnect by the Women’s Leadership foundation for achieving gender balance on its Board of Directors.  Westwater is currently one of only eight public companies in Colorado to have achieved this balance.

Covid-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has not had a significant impact on Westwater’s corporate business activities. Prior to March 1, 2021, Westwater reduced utilization of its offices and instituted remote working arrangements to ensure that some employees were able to work remotely using systems that already were in place. On March 1, 2021, Westwater reopened its Centennial corporate facility and allowed employees to return to the office to work together with appropriate health protocols in place. Westwater’s continued focus on the health and safety of employees, the safety of operations, and the safety of the communities in which our employees live and work remains paramount. To that end, Westwater has continued to restrict unnecessary travel, and ensured that employees are permitted to take time off due to illness or the illness of those around them without penalty.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Our internet website address is www.westwaterresources.net. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available free of charge through our website under the tab “Investor” as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. We also make available on our website copies of materials regarding our corporate governance policies and practices, including our Code of Ethics, Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, Audit Committee Charter and Compensation Committee Charter. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a printed copy of the foregoing materials by sending a written request to: Westwater Resources, Inc., 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112, Attention: Information Request, or by calling 303.531.0516. The information found on our internet website is not part of this or any report filed or furnished to the SEC.

20

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

approvals, pollution discharge permits, work safety approvals and the completion of inspection and acceptance by relevant authorities. As a result, we may be subject to administrative uncertainty, fines or the suspension of work on such projects.

Construction delays related to the Coosa Plant or failure to operate the Coosa Plant in accordance with agreements with the State of Alabama and local municipalities could result in the loss of otherwise available tax credits and incentives.  

To the extent we are unable to successfully complete construction on time or at all, our ability to develop the Coosa Project could be adversely affected, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, growth prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company may incur unexpected costs or delays in the construction of the Coosa Plant.

The Company is in the process of developing and constructing the Coosa Plant.  The completion of the Coosa Plant without delays or significant cost overruns involves substantial risks that may occur, including the accuracy of the estimates and findings in the DFS; successful negotiation of construction contracts; challenges with managing contractors and vendors; subcontractor performance; adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; contractor and/or vendor delays; increased costs, shortages, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor; delays due to judicial or regulatory action; nonperformance under construction or other agreements; engineering or design problems; negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic or future pandemic health events; work stoppages; continued public and policymaker support for the project; environmental and geological conditions; and challenges with start-up activities and operational performance.  Additionally, the Coosa Plant includes the Company’s improved method for purification of graphite concentrate and is a design process that has not previously been constructed.

The Company is not producing any products at a commercial scale at this time. As a result, we do not currently have a reliable source of operating cash. If we cannot successfully transition to commercial scale production of graphite and vanadium, partner with another company that has cash resources, find other means of generating and/or access additional sources of private or public capital, we may not be able to remain in business.

We do not have a committed source of financing for the development of our graphite or vanadium projects. Pursuant to our DFS, the remaining capital expenditures to construct Phase I of the Coosa Plant are estimated at approximately $198 million, and delays in constructing the commercial scale processing facility and other cost overruns may increase that estimate significantly. As of December 31, 2021, we have approximately $115.3 million in cash, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, for the remainder of the amount needed to construct Phase I of the Coosa Plant or develop our properties. Our inability to construct the Coosa Plant or develop our properties would have a material adverse effect on our future operations.

We have incurred losses and have had no revenue from operations since 2009, and we expect to continue to incur losses in the foreseeable future. We have no way to generate cash inflows outside of financing activities and we will continue to incur operating losses until we begin graphite and/or vanadium production on a scale sufficient to generate revenues to fund continuing operations, which cannot be assured. Our future graphite production is dependent on completion of the Coosa Plant and successful implementation of graphite purification technology. Our future vanadium production is dependent upon the completion of an evaluation plan that will assess the amount, location and size of vanadium concentrations at our Coosa Deposit in Alabama. We can provide no assurance that we will successfully produce graphite on a commercial scale, that our properties will be placed into production or that we will be able to continue to find, develop, acquire and finance additional mineral resources or reserves. If we fail to reach commercial scale production and cannot find other means of generating revenue other than producing graphite and vanadium and/or access additional sources of private or public capital, we may not be able to remain in business and holders of our securities may lose their entire investment.

Volatility in graphite and vanadium prices may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

Unless and until the Company produces natural graphite from the Coosa Deposit in Alabama, which is not projected to occur until the next six to eight years at the earliest, the Company will be exposed to fluctuations in the price

22

Table of Contents

of natural flake graphite, which may increase substantially as the demand for graphite increases. In addition, the Company’s graphite and vanadium exploration and development activities may be significantly adversely affected by volatility in the price of graphite or vanadium. The success of our mining operations and ability to achieve positive cash flow is dependent on our ability to develop our properties and then operate them at a profit sufficient to finance further mining activities and for the acquisition and development of additional properties. Any profit will necessarily be dependent upon, and affected by, the long and short-term market prices of graphite and vanadium. Mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control such as global and regional supply and demand, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, and the political and economic conditions of mineral-producing countries throughout the world. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company’s graphite and vanadium activities not producing an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable. In addition, a significant, sustained drop in graphite and vanadium prices would cause us to recognize impairment of the carrying value of our graphite and vanadium or other assets, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial conditions and results of operations

Our operations are subject to environmental risks.

We are required to comply with environmental protection laws, regulations and permitting requirements in the United States, and we anticipate that we will be required to continue to do so in the future in connection with our Coosa Project. We have expended significant resources, both financial and managerial, to comply with environmental protection laws, regulations and permitting requirements, and we anticipate that we will be required to continue to do so in the future. The material laws and regulations within the U.S. include the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, Federal Land Policy Management Act, National Park System Mining Regulations Act, the State Mined Land Reclamation Acts or State Department of Environmental Quality regulations and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the rules and regulations of the NEPA, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) as applicable.

We cannot predict what environmental legislation, regulation or policy will be enacted or adopted in the future or how future laws and regulations will be administered or interpreted. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation, generally, is toward stricter standards, and this trend is likely to continue in the future. This recent trend includes, without limitation, laws and regulations relating to air and water quality, reclamation, waste handling and disposal, the protection of certain species, the preservation of certain lands, and epidemics and pandemics to the degree they impact us or our activities. These regulations may require the acquisition of permits or other authorizations for certain activities. These laws and regulations may also limit or prohibit activities on certain lands. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations, as well as potentially more vigorous enforcement policies or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may necessitate significant capital outlays, may materially affect our results of operations and business or may cause material changes or delay to our intended activities.

Our operations may require additional analysis in the future including environmental, cultural and social impact and other related studies. Certain activities require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers and employees. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary permits that may be required to continue our operation or exploration of our properties or, if feasible, to commence development, construction or operation of mining facilities at such properties on terms which enable operations to be conducted at economically justifiable costs. If we are unable to obtain or maintain permits or water rights for development of our properties or otherwise fail to manage adequately future environmental issues, our operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Competition from better-capitalized companies affects prices and our ability to acquire both properties and personnel.

There is global competition for capital, graphite and vanadium customers and the employment and retention of qualified personnel. In the production and marketing of graphite and vanadium, there are a number of producing entities, some of which are government controlled and most of which are significantly larger and better capitalized than we are.

23

Table of Contents

Many of these organizations also have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing and distribution resources than we have.

Because we have limited capital, inherent manufacturing and mining risks pose a significant threat to us compared with our larger competitors.

Because we have limited capital, we may be unable to withstand significant losses that can result from inherent risks associated with manufacturing and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, flooding, earthquake, pandemics, interruptions due to weather conditions and other acts of nature which larger competitors could withstand. Such risks could result in damage to or destruction of our infrastructure and production facilities, as well as to adjacent properties, personal injury, environmental damage and processing and production delays, causing monetary losses and possible legal liability.

We are dependent on experts and subject to workforce factors that could affect operations.

Our business and mineral exploration and processing programs depend upon our ability to employ the services of geologists, engineers and other experts. In operating our business and in order to continue our projects, we compete for the services of professionals with other mineral exploration and processing companies and businesses. Our ability to maintain and expand our business and continue our development of the Coosa Project may be impaired if we are unable to continue to engage those parties currently providing services and expertise to us or identify and engage other qualified personnel to do so in their place.

We must attract, train and retain a workforce to meet future needs for the development of the Coosa Project.  To retain key employees, we may face increased compensation costs, including potential new stock incentive grants and there can be no assurance that the incentive measures we implement will be successful in helping us retain our key personnel.  Increased costs and reduced supply of labor may lead to operating challenges.  Failure to hire and adequately train employees and retain key employees may adversely affect the Company’s ability to manage and operate its business.

Our patents and other protective measures may not adequately protect our proprietary intellectual property, and we may be infringing on the rights of others.

Our intellectual property, particularly our proprietary rights to an improved method for the purification of graphite concentrate, is critical to our success. We have filed patent applications in the United States, and we generally enter into confidentiality and invention agreements with our employees and consultants. We cannot assure that a patent application will result in an issued patent and our failure to secure rights under the patent application may limit our ability to protect the intellectual property rights at the core of our proposed graphite production business. In addition, such patent protection and agreements and various other measures we take to protect our intellectual property from use by others may not be effective for various reasons generally applicable to patents and their granting and enforcement. In addition, the costs associated with enforcing patents, confidentiality and invention agreements or other intellectual property rights may be expensive. Our inability to protect our proprietary intellectual property rights or gain a competitive advantage from such rights could harm our ability to generate revenues and, as a result, our business and operations.

We could also become subject to litigation claiming that our intellectual property or proprietary information infringes the rights of a third party. In that event, we could incur substantial defense costs and, if such litigation is successful, we could be required to pay the claimant damages and royalties for our past and future use of such intellectual property or proprietary information, or we could be prohibited from using it in the future, which could prevent us from pursuing our graphite production business, or we could be required to modify our process and facilities. Our inability to use our intellectual property and proprietary information on a cost-effective basis in the future could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, cash flow and profitability.

24

Table of Contents

Pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks, including the novel coronavirus (COVID-19 virus), may disrupt our business, supply chains and the business of our business partners, which could materially affect our operations, liquidity and results of operations.

We face various risks related to health epidemics, pandemics and similar outbreaks, including the global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”). The continued spread of COVID-19 has led to disruption and volatility in the global capital markets, which increases the cost of capital and adversely impacts access to capital. If significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, facility closures or other restrictions in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, our operations will likely be impacted. In addition, our costs may increase as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. These cost increases may not be fully recoverable or adequately covered by insurance.

It is possible that the continued spread of COVID-19 could also further cause disruption in our supply chains, adversely affect our business partners, delay our plans to advance our commercial facilities or cause other unpredictable events. We continue to work with our stakeholders to address this global pandemic responsibly. In addition, we continue to monitor the situation, to assess further possible implications to our business, and to take actions in an effort to mitigate adverse consequences. We cannot at this time predict the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it could have material adverse effects on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.

The timing and amount of compensation relating to the revocation of the mining and exploration licenses for our Temrezli and Sefaatli projects is yet to be determined.

On June 20, 2018, the General Directorate of Mining Affairs, a department of the Turkish Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, notified the Company that the mining and exploration licenses for its Temrezli and Sefaatli projects located in Turkey had been revoked and potential compensation would be proffered. Westwater has reached out on numerous occasions to the Turkish government to resolve this dispute amicably, to reinstate the licenses and to remedy its unlawful actions, but to no avail. As a result, on December 13, 2018 Westwater filed a Request for Arbitration against the Republic of Turkey before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”), pursuant to the Treaty between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investments, seeking damages and other relief. On December 21, 2018, ICSID advised that it had formally “registered” the Request for Arbitration. On March 11, 2020, Turkey filed a request to bifurcate the arbitration proceeding, and on March 30, 2020, Westwater filed a response in opposition to Turkey’s request for bifurcation. On April 28, 2020, the arbitral tribunal denied Turkey’s bifurcation request. On May 13, 2020, Turkey filed with the arbitral tribunal a request, which Westwater elected not to oppose, to extend the date on which their Counter-Memorial must be filed (and to change dates for subsequent pleadings as well as document production and witness identification deadlines), which the tribunal approved on June 3, 2020. As a result of these decisions by the tribunal, Turkey filed its Counter-Memorial on September 14, 2020. The hearing on the substantive issues and damages occurred in the third quarter of 2021.  The Company does not expect a formal ruling on the matter until the second half of 2022.

While the Company intends to continue to seek full and fair compensation for the licenses through arbitration with ICSID, the timing of such compensation is yet to be determined. In addition, the Company can provide no assurance about the amount of compensation, if any and an adverse result could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial conditions and results of operations.

Risks Related to Exploration and Mining Activities

Exploration and development of graphite and vanadium properties are risky and subject to great uncertainties.

The exploration for and development of graphite and vanadium deposits involves significant risks. It is impossible to ensure that the current and future exploration programs on our existing properties will establish reserves. Whether an ore body will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; graphite and  vanadium prices, which cannot be predicted and which have been highly volatile in the past; mining, processing and transportation costs; perceived levels of political risk and the willingness of lenders and investors to provide project financing; availability of labor, labor costs and possible

25

Table of Contents

labor strikes; availability of drilling rigs; and governmental regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting materials, foreign exchange, environmental protection, employment, worker safety, transportation, and reclamation and closure obligations. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable deposits of minerals and there can be no assurance that any of our exploration stage properties will be commercially mineable or can be brought into production.

The size and extent of the Company’s vanadium mineral reserves at the Coosa Project is unknown and may not be in sufficient quantities to make its extraction and processing economically feasible.

The Company discovered vanadium concentrations at the Coosa Deposit and is executing an exploration plan to further investigate the size and extent of those concentrations. While there can be no assurance that the size and extent of those concentrations will end up being economically feasible, even if the Company finds vanadium in sufficient quantities to warrant recovery, it ultimately may not be recoverable. Finally, even if any vanadium is recoverable, the Company does not know whether recovery can be done at a profit. Our vanadium activities are highly prospective, face a high risk of failure and may not result in any benefit to the Company.

Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration ventures and the high rate of failure of such ventures. The likelihood of success of the Company’s vanadium exploration activities must be considered in light of the potential problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of new mineral properties. These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates. The expenditures to be made by the Company in the exploration of its new vanadium claims may not result in the discovery of new vanadium deposits. Problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions are involved in new mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. If the results of the Company’s new exploration ventures do not reveal viable commercial mineralization, it may decide to abandon its claims. If this happens, the Company will not benefit from any of the expenditures it will incur in pursuing the claims.

The Company does not have and may not be able to obtain surface or access rights to all or a portion of the Coosa Deposit.

Although the Company has rights to the minerals in the ground at the Coosa Deposit, the Company does not have rights to, or ownership of, the surface to the areas covered by its mineral rights. While applicable mining laws usually provide for rights of access to the surface for the purpose of carrying on mining activities, the enforcement of such rights through the courts can be costly and time consuming. It may be necessary for the Company to negotiate surface access or to purchase the surface rights if long-term access is required. There can be no guarantee that, despite having the right at law to access the surface and carry-on mining activities, the Company will be able to negotiate satisfactory agreements with any such existing landowners/occupiers for such access or purchase such surface rights, and therefore it may be unable to carry out planned exploration or mining activities at the Coosa Deposit. In addition, in circumstances where such access is denied, or no agreement can be reached, the Company may need to rely on the assistance of local officials or the courts in such jurisdiction, the outcomes of which cannot be predicted with any certainty. The inability of the Company to secure surface access or purchase required surface rights could materially and adversely affect the timing, cost or overall ability of the Company to develop any mineral deposits it may locate at the Coosa Deposit.

Because mineral exploration and development activities are inherently risky, we may be exposed to environmental liabilities and other dangers. If we are unable to maintain adequate insurance, or liabilities exceed the limits of our insurance policies, we may be unable to continue operations.

The business of mineral exploration and extraction involves a high degree of risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into production. Unusual or unexpected formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labor disruptions, flooding, explosions, cave-ins, landslides and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor are other risks involved in extraction operations and the conduct of exploration programs. Previous mining operations may have caused environmental damage at certain of our properties. It may be difficult or impossible to assess the extent to which such damage was caused by us or by the activities of previous operators, in which case, any

26

Table of Contents

indemnities and exemptions from liability may be ineffective. If any of our properties are found to have commercial quantities of minerals, we would be subject to additional risks respecting any development and production activities.

Although we carry property and liability insurance with respect to our mineral development and exploration operations, we may become subject to liability for damage to life and property, environmental damage, cave-ins or hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure because of cost or other business reasons. In addition, the insurance industry is undergoing change and premiums are being increased. If we are unable to procure adequate insurance because of cost, unavailability or otherwise, we might be forced to cease operations.

Title to the Coosa Deposit may be subject to defects in title or other claims, which could affect our property rights and claims.

There are risks that title to the Coosa Deposit may be challenged or impugned. There may be valid challenges to the title of the Coosa Deposit which, if successful, could impair development or operations. This is particularly the case because we hold our interest solely through a lease, as such interest is substantially based on contract as opposed to a direct interest in the property.

The lease agreements pursuant to which the Company has interests in the Coosa Deposit provide that the Company must make a series of cash payments over certain time periods. Failure by the Company to make such payments in a timely fashion may result in the Company losing its interest in the Coosa Deposit. There can be no assurance that the Company will have, or be able to obtain, the necessary financial resources to be able to maintain the lease agreements in good standing, or to be able to comply with all of its obligations thereunder, which could result in the Company forfeiting its interest in the Coosa Deposit.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile and may fluctuate significantly, which may adversely impact investor confidence and results and increase the likelihood of securities class action litigation.

Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain volatile in the future. During 2021, the sale price of our common stock ranged from a high of $10.71 per share to a low of $2.12 per share. Volatility in our stock price can be driven by many factors including, but not limited to, market conditions in the energy materials industry, announcements that we may make regarding our business plans or strategy, including announcements concerning our anticipated battery-graphite business, the substantial increase in the sale and issuance of shares of our common stock to finance our operations and the accuracy of expectations and predictions of analysts and the market as they pertain to our future business prospects. In addition, the price of our common stock may increase or decrease substantially for reasons unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. If our common stock continues to experience substantial price volatility, any shares investors purchase may rapidly lose some or substantially all of their value.

Shareholders of a public company sometimes bring securities class action suits against the company following periods of instability in the market price of that company’s securities.  If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations, which could harm our results of operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit.  Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future.  In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Furthermore, our ability to raise funds through the issuance of equity or otherwise use our common stock as consideration is impacted by the price of our common stock.  A low stock price may adversely impact our ability to fund our operating and growth plans, including Phase I of the Coosa Plant, which would harm our business and prospects.

27

Table of Contents

The Company has no history of paying dividends on its common stock, and we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company has not previously paid dividends on its common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all of our available cash, if any, for use as working capital and for other general corporate purposes. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends and other considerations that our Board of Directors deems relevant. Investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize a return on their investment.

Terms of subsequent financings may adversely impact holders of our securities.

In order to finance our future production plans and working capital needs, we may have to raise funds through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Depending on the type and the terms of any financing we pursue, holders of our securities’ rights and the value of their investment in our common stock could be reduced. A financing could involve one or more types of securities including common stock, convertible debt or warrants to acquire common stock. These securities could be issued at or below the then prevailing market price for our common stock. We currently have no authorized preferred stock. In addition, if we issue secured debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim to our assets that would be prior to the rights of holders of our other securities until the debt is paid. Interest on these debt securities would increase costs and negatively impact operating results. If the issuance of new securities results in diminished rights to holders of our common stock, the market price of our common stock could be negatively impacted.

Shareholders would be diluted if we use common stock to raise capital, and the perception that such sales may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fall.

We plan to seek additional capital to carry out our business plan. This financing could involve one or more types of securities including common stock, convertible debt or warrants to acquire common stock. These securities could be issued at or below the then prevailing market price for our common stock. Any issuance of additional shares of our common stock could be dilutive to existing holders of our securities and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

28

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

$10,000 for the original lease in order to maintain our property rights. The Company is obligated to pay the owner of the mineral estate a net smelter return royalty of 2.00% for any production and sale of graphite, vanadium and other minerals derived from the leased lands. There is a further obligation to pay a 0.50% net smelter return royalty, not to exceed $150,000, and make payments of $100,000 at the time of completion of a “bankable feasibility study” and an additional $150,000 upon completion of “full permitting” of the leased property. These payments are payable to an unaffiliated third-party. The Company does not hold any surface rights in the project area.

Accessibility. Access to the Coosa Deposit is good. The general area of the Coosa Deposit is accessible from local and regional population centers via a network of paved federal, state and county two-lane highways. Various parts of the project lands are traversed by numerous partially maintained dirt and gravel logging roads.

History. The Coosa Deposit is situated near the southwestern end of the Alabama Graphite Belt, which is a northeast-trending group of graphite deposits and occurrences that are situated in the central and eastern parts of the state. The initial attempt to produce graphite mineralization in the Alabama Graphite Belt commenced in 1888, with efforts focusing upon prospects located to the northeast of the region of the Coosa Deposit. The first commercial production of graphite from deposits in the Alabama Graphite Belt was in 1899 and limited activities continued at least into the 1940s. Within the lands that comprise the Coosa Deposit, graphite production was carried out at the Fixico mine, which operated intermittently between 1902 and 1908. Other graphite prospects in the project area were evaluated but no efforts were made to mine any other prospects in the project area. Alabama Graphite acquired property rights that comprise the Coosa Deposit and carried out trenching and drilling programs and completed an aerial geophysical survey of a portion of the project area between 2012 and 2015.

Project Geology. The Coosa Deposit is located at the southern-most end of the Appalachian mountain range in east-central Alabama. Within the Appalachian Mountains a group of Precambrian to Paleozoic age metamorphic rocks host scattered graphite deposits, in an area known as the Alabama Graphite Belt. At the Coosa Deposit, graphite mineralization, sometimes associated with vanadium mineralization, is hosted within the Higgins Ferry Group, which is comprised of coarse to fine-grained biotite-feldspar-quartz gneiss, various quartz-muscovite and quartz-muscovite-graphite schist, quartzite and altered mafic rocks. The rocks of the Higgins Ferry Group are thought to be Precambrian to Paleozoic in age. In the project area, graphite (and vanadium) mineralization is hosted in a series of quartz-muscovite-biotite-graphite and quartz-graphite schists that are generally medium to coarse grained, and are moderately foliated and somewhat contorted. The graphitic schist units are occasionally cut by pegmatites, which are unmineralized with respect to graphite and vanadium. Graphite grades in the quartz-muscovite-biotite-graphite schist are generally 1 percent graphite or less, while graphite grades in the quartz-graphite schist commonly exceed 1 percent. The graphitic schists are moderately to strongly weathered to depths that may extend 10s of feet to occasionally more than 100 feet, and can generally be considered to be surface minable.

Project Activities. Prior to its acquisition by Westwater, Alabama Graphite carried out several exploration programs to identify and partially define the potential extent and magnitude of graphite mineralization at the Coosa Deposit, including core and sonic drilling, trenching and sampling, and an airborne geophysical survey. As a result of this exploration, a near-surface graphite deposit was partially defined in the central portion of the project area. A study of the potential magnitude and extent of the graphite resources of the Coosa Deposit was completed by an independent third-party engineering firm, as was the preparation of a preliminary mine plan for possible future development of the deposit, which were both completed by Alabama Graphite prior to its acquisition by Westwater.

30

Table of Contents

Permitting Status. The Company holds an exploration license from the State of Alabama for the Coosa Deposit, and is currently reviewing and applying for local, State, and federal permits for future development.

Coosa Plant

The Coosa Plant is located near Kellyton, Alabama and five miles northwest of Alexander City, Alabama. AGP executed a land lease with the Lake Martin Area Industrial Development Authority, providing AGP rights to approximately 70 acres to construct and operate the Coosa Plant.  Westwater plans to develop the Coosa Plant in two phases (Phases I and II).  

Construction activities for Phase I of the Coosa Plant began in the fourth quarter of 2021 with completion expected in the first half of 2023. A plan and design for Phase II is in place at a pre-feasibility level (“PFS”). The future estimated costs to develop and expected production for each phase of the Coosa Plant development is based on Westwater’s completed DFS, for Phase I, and the PFS for Phase II.

​

31

Table of Contents

Production Pilot Operations

The Company completed its pilot program in 2021 and produced approximately 13 metric tonnes of battery-grade graphite products. During the pilot scale program, graphite concentrates were purified and turned into battery grade advance products.  The majority of the pilot program was performed at contracted laboratories. The purified material was manufactured into our three products, purified micronized graphite, coated spherical purified graphite and delaminated expanded graphite. The results of the pilot program were used to inform the results of the Company’s DFS, and to provide samples to potential customers.

Project Development Plan

Phase I: Beginning in the first half 2023, the Coosa Plant is expected to process graphite concentrate to produce approximately 3,700 mt of ULTRA-CSPG™ and 3,800 mt of SPG fines, annually. Graphite concentrate feedstock is anticipated to be supplied from outside sources until at least 2028.

Phase II: Upon completion of Phase II, the Company expects to produce approximately 15,800 mt of ULTRA-CSPG™ and 16,600 mt of SPG fines.

​

32

Table of Contents

INSURANCE

Our properties are covered by various types of insurance including property and casualty, liability and umbrella coverage. We have not experienced any material uninsured or under insured losses related to our properties in the past and believe that sufficient insurance coverage is in place.

33

Table of Contents

On January 27, 2020, Westwater filed its Memorial, which is a document that sets out Westwater’s case. On March 11, 2020, Turkey filed a request to bifurcate the arbitration proceeding, and on March 30, 2020, Westwater filed a response in opposition to Turkey's request for bifurcation. In Procedural Order #2 issued on April 28, 2020, the arbitral tribunal denied Turkey’s bifurcation request. On May 13, 2020, Turkey filed with the arbitral tribunal a request which Westwater elected not to oppose, to extend the date on which their Counter-Memorial must be filed (and to change dates for subsequent pleadings as well as document production and witness identification deadlines), which the arbitral tribunal approved on June 3, 2020. As a result of these decisions by the tribunal, Turkey filed its Counter-Memorial on September 14, 2020. Westwater filed its reply to the Counter-Memorial on March 17, 2021. The hearing on the substantive issues was conducted during the week of September 13-17, 2021.  The Company does not expect a formal ruling on the matter until the second half of 2022.

OTHER

The Company is subject to periodic inspection by certain regulatory agencies for the purpose of determining compliance by the Company with the conditions of its permits and licenses. In the ordinary course of business, minor violations may occur; however, these are not expected to result in material expenditures or have any other material adverse effect on the Company.

34

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

Westwater Resources, Inc. is a 44-year-old public company focused on developing battery-grade natural graphite materials. Westwater now is focused on battery-grade natural graphite materials after its acquisition of Alabama Graphite in April 2018. Combined with the anticipated construction of the Coosa Plant near Kellyton, Alabama, the Company is executing an exploration plan to further investigate the size and extent of mineral concentrations at the Coosa Deposit, located near Rockford, Alabama, and to increase our knowledge of the deposit as a whole.

SUMMARY OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

In October 2021, Westwater completed the DFS for Phase I of the Coosa Plant.  The DFS defined the key technological components for the Phase I of the Coosa Plant, assessed the processes, equipment and facilities required, and provided the design of Phase I of the Coosa Plant. The DFS also affirmed management’s evaluation and assessment of the entire project and its associated financial investment. Phase I of the Coosa Plant is expected to produce 3,700 mt of ULTRA-CSPG™ per year, and 3,800 mt of SPG Fines per year for 35 years.  Phase I production is anticipated to commence in 2023.  Phase II of the Coosa Plant is expected to increase production to 15,800 mt of ULTRA-CSPG™  and 16,600 mt of SPG Fines per year.   Phase II will be the subject of an updated definitive feasibility study, upon completion and commissioning of Phase I of the Coosa Plant. 

Westwater has contracted with several world-renowned engineering and technology organizations to engineer, procure and construct Phase I of the Coosa Plant, notably:

In November 2021, Westwater established the construction management process and team. Key partners in the team were hired:  Fite Construction as the construction manager; and Samuels Engineering for engineering and procurement. Construction activities began in December 2021.   We are working to secure other contractors and have focused on ordering specialized equipment that have long lead times from manufacturers that were identified in, and were part of, the DFS.

On October 11, 2021, Westwater announced that its Board of Directors approved the purchase of two buildings adjacent to the plant.   The two structures total 90,000 square feet of enclosed space, and will be used for administration, training, lab work and warehousing.  The two structures saved Westwater money and construction time as compared to building them from the ground-up.

Westwater continued exploration activities through 2021 with a drilling program on the Coosa Deposit, which is also designed to evaluate the economic viability of vanadium. Core test samples were sent to independent laboratories for analysis, and the results from the drilling will be analyzed and evaluated for inclusion in our resource estimate in 2022.

Also, in 2021 Westwater completed the production of over 13 mt of purified graphite from its pilot program for performance testing. Westwater sent samples to a number of potential customers, and those samples are under evaluation. The Westwater sales and marketing team engaged with a number of potential customers, and on November 17, 2021 Westwater announced a Letter of Intent to negotiate the terms for the potential sale of 125-150 mt of CSPG for lithium-ion batteries to a battery materials manufacturer, with delivery currently expected in 2023, subject to the commissioning and operation of a pilot plant and a full-scale plant by the counterparty, the Company meeting certain quality and packaging specifications, and customary conditions.

For additional information related to the recent development above and other 2021 business developments please see “Key Business and Corporate Developments in 2021” under Item 1. Description of Business in this Annual Report.

35

Table of Contents

The COVID-19 Pandemic and our Actions to Ensure Safety

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization designated COVID-19 as a global pandemic. The pandemic spread outside of China during the first quarter of 2020 and has impacted businesses and economies throughout the world. In the U.S., many state and local governments have, based on local conditions, either recommended or mandated actions to slow the transmission of COVID-19. These measures range from limitations on crowd size to masking to mandatory orders for non-essential citizens to test and quarantine. Borders between many countries have been closed to contain the spread of COVID-19. Uncertainty with respect to the economic effects of the pandemic has introduced significant volatility in the financial markets.

To the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic continues or worsens, including by reason of the emergence of variant strains of the virus, local governments or governmental agencies may impose additional restrictions. The result of COVID-19 and those restrictions could result in a number of adverse impacts to Westwater’s business, including but not limited to additional disruption to the economy, additional work restrictions, and supply chains being interrupted, slowed, or rendered inoperable. As a result, it may be challenging to obtain and process raw materials to support business needs, and individuals could become ill, quarantined, or otherwise unable to work and/or travel due to health reasons or governmental restrictions. Governments may also impose other laws, regulations or taxes which could adversely impact Westwater’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The potential effects of COVID-19 could also impact Westwater in a number of other ways including, but not limited to, laws and regulations affecting business, the availability of future borrowings, the cost of borrowings, and potential impairment of the carrying value of long-lived tangible assets.

This pandemic, and the uncertain economic conditions it has created, could adversely affect our operations, major facilities, or employees’ health. Westwater has the following priorities while managing business activities during this period of volatility and uncertainty:

Westwater’s corporate business activities are largely unaffected at this time by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to March 1, 2021, Westwater reduced utilization of its offices and initiated remote working arrangements to ensure that some employees were able to work remotely using systems that already were in place. On March 1, 2021, Westwater reopened its Centennial corporate facility and allowed employees to return to the office to work together with appropriate health protocols in place. Westwater’s continued focus on the health and safety of employees, the safety of operations, and the safety of the communities in which our employees live and work remains paramount. To that end, Westwater has continued to restrict unnecessary travel, and ensured that employees are permitted to take time off due to illness or the illness of those around them without penalty.

Equity Financings

Capital Raises during the Year ended December 31, 2021

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold approximately 6.1 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $34.6 million pursuant to the 2020 Lincoln Park PA. Additionally, the Company sold approximately 10.0 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $49.5 million pursuant to the ATM Offering Agreement with Cantor. These shares were sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement filed on August 20, 2021, and in accordance with Rule 424(b)(5) as a takedown off the Company’s shelf registration statement, which had been declared effective by the Commission on July 8, 2021.

36

Table of Contents

As a result of the equity financing activities above, the Company received total net proceeds of $84.1 million, resulting in a cash balance of approximately $115.3 million at December 31, 2021. The significant treasury balance is sufficient to fund the Company’s 2022 operating budget as well the Company’s remaining product development costs, and the Company anticipates making a continued investment in Phase I of the Coosa Plant throughout 2022.

Transfer of Common Stock Listing to the NYSE American Stock Exchange

On March 8, 2021, the Company, acting pursuant to authorization from its Board of Directors, determined to voluntarily withdraw the listing of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per share, from The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) and transfer the listing to the NYSE American. The Company informed Nasdaq on March 8, 2021, of its intent to transfer the listing of its common stock to the NYSE American. The Company’s listing and trading of its common stock on Nasdaq ended at market close on March 18, 2021, and trading began on the NYSE American on March 19, 2021. The Company’s common stock continues to trade under the ticker symbol “WWR” on the NYSE American.

37

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses

Significant expenditures for general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were:

​

​

General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $3.2 million as compared with 2020. The primary drivers of this increase is due to higher costs related to an increase in stock compensation, higher public company expenses related to the annual shareholder meeting and moving to the NYSE American from the NASDAQ, and higher costs related to the Company’s sales and marketing efforts that began in the third quarter of 2020. The increase is offset partially by lower personnel costs due to the sale of our uranium business at December 31, 2020.

Arbitration Costs

During the year ended December 31, 2021, Westwater incurred legal and expert consulting costs of $2.2 million associated with the Request for Arbitration against the Republic of Turkey. This represents an increase of $0.7 million compared to the prior year. For further reference, see discussion at Part I, Item 3 of this annual report on Form 10-K.  

Mineral property expenses

Mineral property expenses were $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of approximately $0.1 million compared to the prior year.  The increase in mineral property expenses was due to higher payments to land and surface owners for increased activities related to our exploration program.

Non-operating income and expenses

The Company recorded a $2.1 million gain on the sale of enCore shares during the year ended December 31, 2021.  As part of the sale of uranium assets to enCore on December, 31, 2020, Westwater received shares of enCore common stock.  The enCore common stock was originally valued at $1.5 million at December 31, 2020, and sold during the fourth quarter of 2021 for net proceeds of $3.6 million.

Net Loss from Discontinued Operations

Westwater sold its uranium business on December 31, 2020. As a result, the net loss from discontinued operations was $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. See Note 3 and Note 12 to the financial statements for additional information.

38

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL POSITION

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was ($16.9) million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared with ($15.2) million for the prior year. The $1.7 million increase in cash used in operating activities was due primarily to increased graphite product development, exploration, general and administrative, and arbitration costs.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was ($2.1) million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared with ($4.1) million of cash used in investing activities for the prior year. The decrease was primarily a result of cash received of $3.6 million, net of fees, related to the sale of enCore common shares in the fourth quarter of 2021; offset by capital expenditures related to Phase I of the Coosa Plant of ($3.4) million and deposits on processing equipment related to Phase I of Coosa Plant of ($2.7) million. The ($4.1) million in cash used in 2020 was primarily related to cash transferred upon the sales of the uranium assets.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $84.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared with $63.9 million in 2020. Cash inflow for both years was from the sales of common stock through the Company’s ATM Offering Agreement, and the 2020 Lincoln Park PA, and a previous purchase agreement with Lincoln Park which terminated in May 2020. The $20.0 million increase in 2021 was primarily due to greater shelf registration capacity with which to offer registered shares under the ATM Offering Agreement.

39

Table of Contents

future sales under the ATM Offering Agreement and has 9,700,252 shares of common stock available for future sales pursuant to the 2020 Lincoln Park PA.

Management believes the Company’s current cash balance is sufficient to fund its planned non-discretionary expenditures through 2022. The Company may use the ATM Offering Agreement and the 2020 Lincoln Park PA to support construction of Phase I of the Coosa Plant.

While the Company has been successful in the past in raising funds through equity and debt financings as well as through the sale of non-core assets, no assurance can be given that additional financing will be available in amounts sufficient to meet its needs, or on terms acceptable to the Company. Stock price volatility and uncertain economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the recent emergence of variant strains of the virus, could significantly impact the Company’s ability to raise funds through equity financing. Market conditions, including but not limited to, inflation and supply chain disruptions could adversely impact the planned cost of Phase I of the Coosa Plant. Along with evaluating the continued use of the ATM Offering Agreement and the 2020 Lincoln Park PA, the Company may consider project financing for additional funding needed to complete Phase I of the Coosa Plant. The alternative sources of project financing could include, but are not limited to, convertible debt or pursuing a partnership or joint venture. In the event funds are not available for project financing to complete construction of Phase I of the Coosa Plant in 2023, the Company expects to be able to fund its non-discretionary expenditures, however, the Company may be required to change its planned business development strategies.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe our most critical accounting policies involve those requiring the use of significant estimates and assumptions in determining values or projecting future costs.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The Company reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows or upon an estimate of fair value that may be received in an exchange transaction. Future cash flows are estimated based on quantities of recoverable minerals, expected commodity prices, production levels and operating costs of production and capital, based upon the projected remaining future graphite or vanadium production from each project. Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization that is not part of the measured, indicated or inferred resource base, are included when determining the fair value of mine site reporting units at acquisition and, subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of graphite or vanadium that will be obtained after taking into account losses during processing and treatment. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows are based on numerous assumptions and it is likely that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as actual future quantities of recoverable minerals, graphite prices, production levels and operating costs of production and availability and cost of capital are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties.

No impairment was recorded in 2021.  During 2020, we recorded impairments of $5.2 million to reduce the Company’s former uranium assets which were sold in December 2020.  The $5.2 million impairment is included in net loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.

40

Table of Contents

ACCOUNTING FOR GOVERNMENT GRANTS

On June 22, 2021, AGP entered into incentive agreements with the State of Alabama and local municipalities for the siting of the Coosa Plant. The incentive agreements provide certain tax credits and incentives under the Alabama Jobs Act in connection with the construction of the processing facility. Additionally, in connection with and in contemplation of the incentive agreements, on July 23, 2021, AGP entered into a land lease with the Lake Martin Area Industrial Development Authority. The lease provides AGP rights to approximately 70 acres to construct and operate its commercial graphite processing facility in Coosa County, Alabama. The lease has a term of 10-years, a nominal lease payment, and transfer of title to AGP at the end of the lease term. Further, the lease provides AGP the option to purchase the land for a nominal amount during the term of the lease. The incentive agreements and the lease are accounted for by the Company as a government grant.

U.S. GAAP does not contain authoritative accounting standards for incentives and grants provided by governmental entities to a for-profit entity. Absent authoritative accounting standards, interpretative guidance issued and commonly applied by financial statement preparers allows for the selection of accounting policies amongst acceptable alternatives. Based on facts and circumstances outlined below, the Company determined it most appropriate to account for the land received from the local municipality as an in-substance government grant by analogy to International Accounting Standards 20 (“IAS 20”), Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance. Under the provisions of IAS 20, government grants “are assistance by government in the form of transfers of resources to an entity in return for past or future compliance with certain conditions relating to the operating activities of the entity.” A government grant is recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will meet the terms for receiving and realizing the benefit of the grant. IAS 20 does not define “reasonable assurance”, however, based on certain interpretations, it is analogous to “probable” as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 450-20-20 under U.S. GAAP, which is the definition the Company has applied to its determination of recognizing the land grant as of December 31, 2021. Under IAS 20, government grants are recognized in earnings on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Company recognizes costs for which the grant is intended to compensate (i.e. qualified expenses). Further, IAS 20 permits for the recognition in earnings either separately under a general heading such as other income, or as a reduction of the related expenses. The Company has elected to recognize government grant income separately within other income to present a clearer distinction in its financial statements between its operating income and the amount of net income resulting from the land grant.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company realized the fair value of the land of $1.4 million as an increase to Property, Plant, and Equipment with a corresponding obligation recorded in Other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The land represents a non-depreciable asset on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and will evaluate the land for impairment according to its policy on long-lived assets discussed above. The corresponding obligation recorded in Other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet will be amortized to other income over the life of the Coosa Plant once placed in service.

41

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Critical Audit Matter

​

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

​

Accounting Policy for the Land Lease and Incentive Agreements

​

As described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, on June 22, 2021, Alabama Graphite Products, LLC (APG), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into incentive agreements with the State of Alabama and local municipalities for the siting of the Company’s planned graphite processing plant in Coosa County, Alabama. The incentive agreements provide certain tax credits and incentives under the Alabama Jobs Act in connection with the construction of the processing facility. Additionally, in connection to, and in contemplation of the incentive agreements, on July 23, 2021, AGP entered into a land lease with the Lake Martin Area Industrial Development Authority. The lease provides AGP rights to approximately 70 acres to construct and operate its commercial graphite processing facility in Coosa County, Alabama. The lease has a term of 10-years, a nominal lease payment, and transfer of title to AGP at the end of the lease term. Further, the lease provides AGP the option to purchase the land for a nominal amount during the term of the lease. As described in the Company’s accounting policy in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the incentive agreements and the lease are accounted for by the company as a government grant; whereby the Company realized the fair value of the land of $1.4 million as in increase to property, plant, and equipment with a corresponding obligation recorded in Other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2021.

​

We identified the Company’s determination of the appropriate accounting policy for the land lease and incentive agreements to be a critical audit matter. The determination of the accounting policy required significant management judgment given the lack of authoritative guidance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America related to grants for for-profit entities.  A high degree of auditor judgment and increased extent of effort was required when performing audit procedures to evaluate the appropriateness of the accounting policy.

​

​

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

​

-We read the executed incentive agreements and land lease, including all amendments and evaluated the Company’s disclosures.

-We obtained management’s accounting analysis and supporting documentation and agreed key terms to the executed agreements and amendments.

-We evaluated management’s application of the accounting literature to the incentive agreements and land lease and the related accounting conclusions, including performing an accounting consultation with our professional practice group.

-We evaluated management’s assumptions about the achievement of conditions for recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

​

​

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

​

Denver, Colorado

February 11, 2022

​

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

​

43

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

​

44

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

​

​

45

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

​

​

​

46

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

​

47

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Gain or loss on disposal of such assets is recorded as other income or expense upon disposition of such assets.

Accounting for Government Grants

U.S. GAAP does not contain authoritative accounting standards for incentives and grants provided by governmental entities to a for-profit entity. Absent authoritative accounting standards, interpretative guidance issued and commonly applied by financial statement preparers allows for the selection of accounting policies amongst acceptable alternatives. Based on facts and circumstances outlined below, the Company determined it most appropriate to account for the land received from the local municipality as an in-substance government grant by analogy to International Accounting Standards 20 (“IAS 20”), Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance. Under the provisions of IAS 20, government grants “are assistance by government in the form of transfers of resources to an entity in return for past or future compliance with certain conditions relating to the operating activities of the entity.” A government grant is recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will meet the terms for receiving and realizing the benefit of the grant. IAS 20 does not define “reasonable assurance”, however, based on certain interpretations, it is analogous to “probable” as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 450-20-20 under U.S. GAAP, which is the definition the Company has applied to its determination of recognizing the land grant as of December 31, 2021. Under IAS 20, government grants are recognized in earnings on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Company recognizes costs for which the grant is intended to compensate (i.e. qualified expenses). Further, IAS 20 permits for the recognition in earnings either separately under a general heading such as other income, or as a reduction of the related expenses. The Company has elected to recognize government grant income separately within other income to present a clearer distinction in its financial statements between its operating income and the amount of net income resulting from the land grant.

For further information related to government grants recognized by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2021, see Note 4 to these consolidated financial statements.

Asset Impairment

The Company reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows or upon an estimate of fair value that may be received in an exchange transaction. Future cash flows are estimated based on quantities of recoverable minerals, expected commodity prices, production levels and operating costs of production and capital, based upon the projected remaining future mineral production from each project. Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization that is not part of the measured, indicated or inferred resource base, are included when determining the fair value of mine site reporting units at acquisition and, subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of mineral that will be obtained after taking into account losses during processing and treatment. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows are based on numerous assumptions and it is likely that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as actual future quantities of recoverable minerals, mineral prices, production levels and operating costs of production and availability and cost of capital are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties.

49

Table of Contents

Funds deposited by the Company for collateralization of performance obligations are not available for the payment of general corporate obligations and are not included in cash equivalents. Restricted cash consists of cash held in escrow by escrow agents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash equivalents and restricted cash and short-term investments. U.S. GAAP defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price) and establishes a fair-value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value using the following definitions (from highest to lowest priority):

● Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

● Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

● Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques requiring inputs that are both significant to the fair-value measurement and unobservable.

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests. Periodically throughout the year, the Company has maintained balances in various U.S. operating accounts in excess of U.S. federally insured limits.

The following table presents information about financial instruments recognized at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and indicates the fair value hierarchy:

​

​

50

Table of Contents

​

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Assets that are measured on a recurring basis include the Company’s marketable securities and restricted cash. The Company determined the fair value of the equity securities (enCore shares) at December 31, 2020 using the Black-Scholes valuation methodology.  As discussed in Note 3, this resulted in a discount for lack of marketability of $375,000 due to the 4-month holding period before shares could be sold.  Key inputs included a risk-free rate of 0.09% based on 3-month US Treasury Bond yields and a volatility factor of 89.1.  During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company sold 100% of the enCore shares for net proceeds of $3.6 million.

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

As discussed in Note 4, on July 23, 2021, the Company received a land grant from local municipalities related to the Coosa Plant in Coosa County, Alabama. At inception, the Company estimated the fair value of the land to be approximately $1.4 million. The fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs using the market approach, by considering comparable sales in the area, adjusted for property specific items; such as lot size, location and access to major highways and distribution channels. The Company recorded the fair value of the land granted as an increase to Property, Plant and Equipment with an offsetting obligation recorded in Other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. The Company will begin amortizing the obligation to income over the estimated useful life of the Coosa Plant when the plant is placed into service.

Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is not presented as the effect on the basic loss per share would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had 662,580 and 421,457 respectively, in potentially dilutive securities.

Foreign Currency

The functional currency for all foreign subsidiaries of the Company was determined to be the U.S. dollar since its foreign subsidiaries are direct and integral components of Westwater Resources and are dependent upon the economic environment of Westwater Resources’ functional currency. Accordingly, the Company has translated its monetary assets and liabilities at the period-end exchange rate and the non-monetary assets and liabilities at historical rates, with income and expenses translated at the average exchange rate for the current period. All translation gains and losses have been included in the current period loss.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740)” which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. ASU 2019-12 became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 did not result in a material impact to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

51

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU 2016-13 will change how companies account for credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade receivables, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, companies will be required to estimate lifetime expected credit losses and recognize an allowance against the related instruments. For available for sale debt securities, companies will be required to recognize an allowance for credit losses rather than reducing the carrying value of the asset. The adoption of this update, if applicable, will result in earlier recognition of losses and impairments.

In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, “Codification Improvements to ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses.” ASU 2016-13 introduced an expected credit loss methodology for the impairment of financial assets measured at amortized cost basis. That methodology replaces the probable, incurred loss model for those assets. ASU 2018-19 is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2018-270, which has been deleted. Additionally, the amendments clarify that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of Subtopic 326-20. Instead, impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with ASC 842, Leases.

These updates are effective beginning January 1, 2023, and the Company is currently evaluating ASU 2016-13 and ASU 2018-19 and the potential impact of adopting this guidance on its financial reporting.

​

The Company last recorded revenues from operations in 2009. Since 2009, the Company has relied on equity financings, debt financings and asset sales to fund its operations. The Company expects to rely on debt and equity financing to fund its operations into the near future. The Company will also continue its cost reduction initiatives to identify ways to reduce its cash expenditures.

In 2016, the Company began to expand its business plan into acquisition and development of energy-related materials. Between 2016 and 2020 the Company obtained mineral leases in Nevada and Utah and evaluated a green-fields exploration program for lithium.  In 2018, the Company acquired Alabama Graphite for the purpose of developing the only commercial sized graphite mineral deposit in the contiguous United States and production of advanced graphite products for use in batteries. In the third quarter of 2020, the Company made the strategic decision to focus most of its resources on its graphite business, discontinuing its investment in its lithium mineral properties and selling its uranium business.

As of December 31, 2021, execution of the business plan for development of the Coosa Project was underway, with the completion of the pilot program for processing flake graphite into battery-grade graphite products. The start-up of operations for the pilot program commenced in the fourth quarter of 2020 and was completed during the fourth quarter of 2021. The Company used the data generated from the pilot program to inform the DFS and the requirements and specifications for building the Coosa Plant. Subject to financing, the Company expects the construction phase for Phase I of the Coosa Plant to continue throughout 2022 and to be completed in the first half of 2023, at which time the Company expects to begin generating revenues from sales of battery-grade graphite products.

At December 31, 2021 the Company’s cash balances were $115.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold approximately 10.0 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $49.5 million pursuant to the ATM Offering Agreement and 6.1 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $34.6 million pursuant to the 2020 Lincoln Park PA. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has $47.7 million remaining available for future sales under the ATM Offering Agreement and has 9,700,252 shares of common stock available for future sales pursuant to the 2020 Lincoln Park PA.

In furtherance of the Company’s strategic shift to graphite battery materials, on December 31, 2020 the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) to sell its U.S. uranium business, including its U.S. uranium exploration assets in New Mexico and idled production assets in Texas to enCore Energy Corp. (“enCore”) (see Note 3). The transaction closed on December 31, 2020. The sale included the elimination of a $9.3 million bonding

52

Table of Contents

liability, the elimination of $5.2 million in asset retirement obligations, and the elimination of more than $4.0 million in annual expenditures related to reclamation and compliance costs at the Company’s Kingsville, Vasquez, and Rosita sites in South Texas and its New Mexico land holding costs. The Company received approximately $1.8 million of enCore common stock and retained royalty interests on the New Mexico uranium properties as consideration for the sale. The Company retained its uranium interests in Turkey, which are subject to ongoing international arbitration proceeding. The Company’s strategic shift to focus solely on its graphite business also resulted in its decision not to renew its lithium mineral leases in Nevada and Utah when the annual rentals of approximately $0.2 million came due in late August 2020.

Management believes the Company’s current cash balance is sufficient to fund its planned non-discretionary expenditures through 2022. The Company may use of the ATM Offering Agreement and the 2020 Lincoln Park PA to support construction of Phase I of the Coosa Plant.

While the Company has been successful in the past in raising funds through equity and debt financings as well as through the sale of non-core assets, no assurance can be given that additional financing will be available in amounts sufficient to meet its needs, or on terms acceptable to the Company. Stock price volatility and uncertain economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the recent emergence of variant strains of the virus, could significantly impact the Company’s ability to raise funds through equity financing. Market conditions, including but not limited to, inflation and supply chain disruptions, could adversely impact the planned cost of Phase I of the Coosa Plant. Along with evaluating the continued use of the ATM Offering Agreement and the 2020 Lincoln Park PA, the Company may consider project financing for additional funding needed to completed Phase I of the Coosa Plant. The alternative sources of project financing could include, but are not limited to, convertible debt or pursuing a partnership or joint venture. In the event funds are not available for project financing to complete construction of Phase I of the Coosa Plant in 2023, the Company expects to be able to fund its non-discretionary expenditures, however, the Company may be required to change its planned business development strategies.

Sale of Uranium Business to enCore Energy

On December 31, 2020, Westwater, its wholly owned subsidiary URI Neutron Holdings II, Inc. (“Neutron Holdings”), and enCore Energy Corp. (“enCore”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to sell their subsidiaries engaged in the uranium business in Texas and New Mexico (the “Uranium Subsidiaries”) to enCore. The transaction closed December 31, 2020.

At the closing of the transaction, enCore delivered $0.7 million in cash and issued $1.8 million worth of its common shares to Westwater. EnCore shares received by Westwater totaled 2,571,598 common shares.  The number of shares was determined by a pricing formula based on the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of enCore’s common shares for the ten trading days ending on and including December 30, 2020.  The VWAP formula resulted in a price of $0.698. For purposes of determining the fair value of the enCore shares, the Company used the closing price for enCore shares on December 31, 2020 which was $0.736, resulting in a value of approximately $1.9 million.  The Company then determined that a discount for lack of marketability should be considered because (1) the shares were not eligible for sale by Westwater until May 1, 2021, and (2) after May 1, 2021, the terms of the purchase agreement require WWR to offer enCore a first right to buy the shares if the amount to be sold in a single transaction is greater than 250,000 shares.  Utilizing a precedent comparable transaction and Black-Scholes valuation methodology for fair value evaluation, the Company determined that a discount of 21% should be applied to the shares.  Accordingly, the carrying value of the shares was adjusted to reflect a fair value of $1.5 million as of December 31, 2020, and the discount was charged to loss on sale of uranium assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Westwater and Neutron Holdings transferred all of the equity interests in the Uranium Subsidiaries to enCore along with a copy of a database relating to the Grants Mineral Belt located in New Mexico. In addition, enCore delivered to Westwater a 2% net smelter return royalty (“NSR Royalty”) on production from the uranium properties held by Uranco, Inc. in New Mexico, and a 2.5% net profits interest (“NPI”) on the profits from operations of Neutron Energy, Inc.’s Juan Tafoya and Cebolleta Projects. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, enCore has also agreed to replace the

53

Table of Contents

indemnification obligations of Westwater for certain reclamation surety bonds held in the name of URI, Inc., and Westwater transferred to enCore all rights to $3.8 milion in cash collateral held to secure such indemnity obligations.

Also, at closing, in accordance with the terms of the Side Letter executed by the parties, Westwater delivered $0.3 million in cash to enCore, which amount was delivered in escrow upon the request of the lender, Celtic Bank, under the loan made to URI, Inc. in May 2020 pursuant to the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP Loan”).  The escrowed amount was to be released to Westwater upon, and subject to, forgiveness of the PPP Loan under the terms of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. The PPP Loan forgiveness application was filed on January 25, 2021, and Westwater received a notification from the SBA on March 31, 2021 that 100% of the loan had been forgiven. As a result, on March 31, 2021, the escrowed funds were returned to Westwater.

Finally, due to the high degree of uncertainties surrounding future mine development and uranium prices, as well as limited marketability, the Company determined the fair value of the NSR Royalty and NPI to be nil.

The following fair value amounts were recorded as purchase consideration at December 31, 2020:

​

​

The Company recorded the following loss on disposal of uranium properties within its Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020:

​

​

The loss was primarily related to resolution of transaction issues and final negotiations in the fourth quarter leading up to the transaction closing on December 31, 2020.

​

​

54

Table of Contents