UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 333-249533
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Colorado | 85-2602691 |
(State of Other Jurisdiction of incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2886 Carriage Manor Point, Colorado Springs, CO | 80906 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (719) 717-9825
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Name Of Each Exchange | |||
Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | On Which Registered | ||
N/A | N/A |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.0405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 232.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ | Non-accelerated filer x | Smaller reporting company x Emerging growth company x |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☐ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2021 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $138,000,000. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each shareholder affiliated with a director or an executive officer have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of February 28, 2022 was 23,997,876.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Not applicable.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 2 is being filed for the purpose of to add or revise disclosures the following: (i) Item 1 Part 1 has been revised to include the information required by Item 101(h) of Regulation S-K and to clarify which properties are currently in production, under development, or undergoing exploration contained within Item 1; (ii) Item 1A of Part 1 to remove the risk factor “We are an Emerging Growth Company, subject to less stringent reporting and regulatory requirements of other publicly held companies and this status may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract interest in our common stock”; (iii) Item 2 of Part I is reorganized and includes additional disclosures, clarifications, and table tabulations, related to our properties as prescribed by Items 1300 through 1305 of Regulation S-K; (iv) Item 7 of Part II includes further details related to our increase in revenues and gross profits; and file amended versions of the Technical Report Summary of the Isabella Pearl Mine (“IP TRS”) and Initial Assessment Technical Summary for the Golden Mile Property (“GM TRS”).
Our original IP TRS was amended to: (i) include an opinion from the qualified persons as to adequacy of the metallurgical data used to prepare the Technical Report Summary in Section 10.7 Metallurgical Summary; (ii) clarify the location of the property in the Section 3 Property Description and Location; and (iii) disclose the $20 million revenue deduction for excise tax calculation in table 18.2 Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Operating Cash Cost per Tonne Processed (“Table 18.2”), update the calculation in years subsequent to 2022 in Table 18.2 as the deduction was inadvertently omitted in the original IP TRS, and update all tables correlating to Table 18.2. Our original GM TRS was amended to (i) include an opinion from the qualified persons as to adequacy of the metallurgical data used to prepare the Technical Report Summary in Section 10 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing; and (ii) clarification of cut-off grades in Section 11.12 Mineral Resource Estimate.
Item 15 of Part IV of Form 10-K has been amended to contain Exhibit 96.2 and Exhibit 96.6 IP TRS and GM TRS, respectively. The consents for the IP TRS are attached as Exhibit 96.3, 96.4, and 96.5 in Item 15 of Part IV of Form 10-K/A. The consents for the GM TRS are attached as Exhibit 96.7, 96.8, and 96.9 in Item 15 of Part IV of Form 10-K/A.
In addition, Item 15 of Part IV of Form 10-K has been amended to contain Exhibit 23.2 which was inadvertently omitted from the Original Filing.
Pursuant to the SEC rules, Item 15 of Part IV of Form 10-K has also been amended to contain the currently dated certificates from the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Sections 302, 303, and 308 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certificates of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are attached to this Amendment as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, and 32.
Other than as shown in this Form 10-K/A with respect to the information contained herein with respect to Item 1 of Part I, Item 1A of Part 1, Item 2 of Part 1, and Item 7 of Part II, this Amendment No. 2 does not change any of the information contained in the Original Filing or Amendment No. 1. Other than as specifically set forth herein, we have not updated or amended the disclosures contained in the Original Filing or Amendment 1 to reflect events that have occurred since the date thereof. Accordingly, this Amendment No. 2 should be read in conjunction with our Original Filing and Amendment No. 1. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Original Filing and Amendment No. 1.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Descriptions of agreements or other documents contained in this report are intended as summaries and are not necessarily complete. Please refer to the agreements or other documents filed or incorporated herein by reference as exhibits. Please see Item 15. Exhibits for a complete list of those exhibits.
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “plan,” “target,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend”, “expect,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “likely,” and similar expressions to future periods.
Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Rather, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. If you are risk-averse, you should NOT buy shares in Fortitude Gold Corporation. Unexpected events happen and are likely to change forecasts and targets. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
● | The extent of the impact of pandemics, such as COVID-19, including the duration, spread, severity, and any repeated resurgence, the duration and scope of related government orders and restrictions, the impact on our employees, and the extent of the impact of pandemics, such as COVID-19, on our mining operations; |
● | The Biden administration’s current and future stance on resource permitting and development; |
● | Supply chain shortages and inflationary pressures; |
● | Commodity price fluctuations; |
● | Adverse technological changes and cybersecurity threats; |
● | Unanticipated increases in our operating costs and other costs of doing business; |
● | Access to land and availability of materials, equipment, supplies, labor and supervision, power and water; |
● | Results of current and future feasibility studies; |
● | Interpretation of drill hole results and the geology, grade and continuity of mineralization; |
● | Litigation by private parties or regulatory action by governmental entities; |
● | Acts of God such as pandemics, floods, earthquakes and any other natural disasters; |
● | The uncertainty of reserve and mineralized material estimates; and |
● | Such other factors discussed below under “Risk Factors.” |
Any forward-looking statement made by us in this annual report on Form 10-K is based only on information currently available to us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
4
PART I
Item 1. Business
Fortitude Gold Corporation was organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on August 11, 2020. On August 18, 2020, Gold Resource Corporation (“GRC”) transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares of GRC Nevada (“GRCN”) to us. GRCN owns all of GRC’s former Nevada properties, including the Isabella Pearl Mine. On December 31, 2020 GRC completed the spin-off of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Fortitude Gold Corporation, and its subsidiaries (“FGC”), into a separate, public company (the “Spin-Off”). The Spin-Off was effected by the distribution of all of the outstanding shares of FGC common stock to GRC’s shareholders (the “Distribution”). GRC’s shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 28, 2020 (the “Record Date”) received one share of FGC common stock for every 3.5 shares of GRC’s common stock held as of the Record Date. In this report, “Company,” “our,” “us” and “we” refer to Fortitude Gold Corporation together with its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
We are a mining company which pursues gold and silver projects that are expected to have both low operating costs and high returns on capital. We are presently focused on mineral production from our Isabella Pearl Mine in Nevada. The ore mined at Isabella Pearl is processed on site at our processing facilities and sold to a refiner as doré, which contains precious metals of gold and silver. We also continue exploration and evaluation work on our portfolio of other precious metal properties in Nevada and continue to evaluate other properties for possible acquisition.
Effective December 31, 2020, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Company entered into a Management Services Agreement (“MSA” or “Agreement”) with GRC that governed the relationship of the parties following the Spin-Off. The MSA provided that the Company received services from GRC and its subsidiaries to assist in the transition of the Company as a separate company including, managerial and technical supervision, advisory and consultation with respect to mining operations, exploration, environmental, safety and sustainability matters. The Company also received certain administrative services related to information technology, accounting and financial advisory services, legal and compliance support and investor relation and shareholder communication services. The agreed upon charges for services rendered were based on market rates that align with the rates that an unaffiliated service provider would charge for similar services. The MSA’s initial term was to expire on December 31, 2021, would automatically renew annually and may be cancelled upon 30 days written notice by one party to the other during the term. On April 21, 2021, GRC provided the Company 30 days written notice to cancel the MSA effective May 21, 2021.
We own 100% of six properties in Nevada, totaling 1,724 unpatented mining claims covering approximately 32,178 acres, subject to the paramount title of the United States of America, under the administration of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). Under the Mining Law of 1872, which governs the location of unpatented mining claims on federal lands, the owner (locator) has the right to explore, develop, and mine minerals on unpatented mining claims without payments of production royalties to the U.S. government, subject to the surface management regulations of the BLM. Currently, annual claim maintenance fees are the only federal payments related to unpatented mining claims. Annual maintenance fees of $305,865 were paid during 2021.
In addition to the unpatented claims, we also own 26, and lease one, patented mining claims covering approximately 165 acres and an additional 201 acres of fee lands in Mineral County, Nevada. Patented claims and fee lands unlike unpatented claims, pass title to the holder. The patented claims and fee lands are subject to payment of annual property taxes made to the county where they are located. Annual property taxes on our patented claims and fee lands have been paid through June 30, 2022.
All our properties are located in Nevada, five are located in the Walker Lane Mineral Belt which is known for its significant and high-grade gold and silver production and one in west-central Nevada. Activities at our properties in Nevada range from exploration at East Camp Douglas, County Line and Ripper, mineral delineation at Mina Gold, resource definition, engineering and permitting at Golden Mile to production at Isabella Pearl. We believe that our Nevada properties have excellent potential for additional discoveries of both bulk tonnage replacement-type and bonanza-grade vein-type gold deposits, similar to other gold deposits historically mined by other companies in the Paradise Peak, Borealis, Bodie, Tonopah, Goldfield, and Rochester districts.
5
Condition of Physical Assets and Insurance
Our business is capital intensive and requires ongoing investment for the replacement, modernization or expansion of equipment and facilities. We maintain insurance policies against property loss and insure against risks that are typical in the operation of our business in amounts that we believe to be reasonable. Such insurance, however, contains exclusions and limitations on coverage, particularly with respect to property loss, environmental liability, and political risk. There can be no assurance that claims would be paid under such insurance policies in connection with a particular event.
Environmental Matters
We conduct our operations while protecting the environment and believe our operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. Our operating mine has a reclamation plan in place that we believe meets all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. At December 31, 2021, $4.7 million was accrued on our consolidated balance sheet for reclamation costs relating to our properties.
Competitive Business Conditions
The acquisition of gold and silver properties is subject to intense competition. Identifying and evaluating potential mining prospects is a costly and time-consuming endeavor. We may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to many other companies with regard to exploration and, if warranted, advancement of mining properties. We believe that competition for acquiring mineral prospects will continue to be intense in the future.
Government Regulations and Permits
In the U.S., an unpatented mining claim on unappropriated federal land may be acquired pursuant to procedures established by the Mining Law of 1872 and other federal and state laws. These acts generally provide that a citizen of the U.S. (including a corporation) may acquire a possessory right to develop and mine valuable mineral deposits discovered upon appropriate federal lands, provided that such lands have not been withdrawn from mineral location, e.g., national parks, military reservations and lands designated as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System. The validity of all unpatented mining claims is dependent upon inherent uncertainties and conditions. These uncertainties relate to such non-record facts as the sufficiency of the discovery of minerals, proper posting and marking of boundaries, and possible conflicts with other claims not determinable from descriptions of record. Prior to discovery of a locatable mineral on an unpatented mining claim, a mining claim may be open to location by others unless the owner is in possession of the claim.
To maintain an unpatented mining claims in good standing, the claim owner must file with the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) an annual maintenance fee ($165 for each claim, which may change year to year), a maintenance fee waiver certification, or proof of labor or affidavit of assessment work, all in accordance with the laws at the time of filing which may periodically change.
In connection with mining, milling and exploration activities, we are subject to United States federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, including laws and regulations relating to protection of air and water quality, hazardous waste management and mine reclamation as well as the protection of endangered or threatened species. The departments responsible for the environmental regulation include the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP), the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the Nevada Department of Wildlife (“NDOW”). Any of these and other regulators have broad authority to shut down and/or levy fines against facilities that do not comply with their environmental and operational regulations or standards. Potential areas of environmental consideration for mining companies, including ours, include but are not limited to, acid rock drainage, cyanide containment and handling, contamination of water sources, dust, and noise.
We have obtained the permits necessary to develop, construct, and operate our Isabella Pearl Mine. In connection with these permits and exploration activities in Nevada, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing protection of the environment, including, but not limited to, the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act; the Endangered Species Act; the Federal Land Policy and Management Act; the National
6
Environmental Policy Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; and related state laws. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive.
Customers
For both the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, one customer accounted for 96% of our revenue from our Isabella Pearl mine. In the event that our relationship with this customer is interrupted for any reason, we believe that we would be able to locate another entity to purchase our products. However, any interruption could temporarily disrupt the sale of our principal products and adversely affect our operating results. We periodically review our options for alternative sales outlets to mitigate the concentration of risk in case of any unforeseen disruptions.
Human Capital Resources
We have 68 full-time employees, four of which serve as our executive officers. These individuals devote all of their business time to our affairs.
We contract for the services of approximately 61 individuals employed by third parties in Nevada and also use various independent contractors for environmental permitting, mining, surface exploration drilling and trucking.
We believe we have a good morale and a dedicated workforce. Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and additional employees. The principal purposes of our Equity Incentive Plan are to attract, retain and motivate selected employees and directors through the granting of stock-based compensation awards. Competition to identify, hire and retain employees from the small pool of industry experienced professionals is and will continue to be a challenge.
Office Facilities
Our executive and administrative headquarters are located at 2886 Carriage Manor Point, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906 under a renewable one-year lease at a cost of $4,000 per month.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The price of our common stock may be materially affected by a number of risk factors, including those summarized below:
Financial Risks
Our results of operations, cash flows and the value of our properties are highly dependent on the market prices of gold and to a lesser extent silver and these prices can be volatile. The profitability of our gold and silver mining operations and the value of our mining properties are directly related to the market price of gold and silver. The price of gold and silver may also have a significant influence on the market price of our common stock. The market price of gold and silver historically has fluctuated significantly and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include supply and demand fundamentals, global or national political or economic conditions, expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and other currencies, interest rates, gold and silver sales and loans by central banks, forward sales by metal producers, accumulation and divestiture by exchange traded funds, and a number of other factors.
We derive our revenue from the sale of gold and silver and our results of operations will fluctuate as the prices of these metals change. A period of significant and sustained lower gold and silver prices would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. The volatility of mineral prices represents a substantial risk which no amount of planning or technical expertise can fully mitigate and/or eliminate. In the event mineral prices decline or remain low for prolonged periods of time, we may be unable to continue operations and/or develop our existing exploration
7
properties, which may adversely affect our results of operations, financial performance, and cash flows. An asset impairment charge may result from the occurrence of unexpected adverse events that impact our estimates of expected cash flows generated from our producing properties or the market value of our non-producing properties, including a material diminution in the price of gold or silver.
During 2021, the price of gold, as measured by the London P.M. fix, fluctuated from a low of $1,684 per ounce to a high of $1,943 per ounce while the price of silver fluctuated from a low of $21.52 per ounce to a high of $29.58 per ounce. As of February 28, 2022, gold and silver prices were $1,910 per ounce and $24.35 per ounce, respectively. The volatility in gold and silver prices is illustrated by the following table, which sets forth for each of the past five calendar years, the high, low, and average annual market prices in U.S. dollars per ounce of gold and silver based on the daily London P.M. fix:
We may not continue to be profitable. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we reported net income of $17.9 million. Precious metal prices, specifically gold, have a significant impact on our profit margin and there is no assurance that we will be profitable in the future. Unexpected interruptions in our mining business may cause us to incur losses, or the revenue that we generate from production may not be sufficient to fund continuing operations including exploration and mine construction costs. Our failure to generate future profits may adversely affect the price of our common stock and shareholders may lose all or part of their investment.
We may require significant additional capital to fund our business plans. We may be required to expend significant funds to determine if mineralized material, proven and probable mineral reserves and/or measured and indicated resources exist at any of our non-producing properties, to continue exploration, and if warranted, develop our existing properties and to identify and acquire additional properties to diversify our property portfolio. If we receive the necessary permits and make a positive development decision, we will require significant additional capital to bring the project into production. We have spent, and may be required to continue to expend, significant amounts of capital for drilling, geological and geochemical analysis, assaying, feasibility studies, engineering, mine construction and development, and mining and process equipment in connection with our exploration, development, and production activities.
Our ability to obtain necessary funding for these purposes, in turn, depends upon a number of factors, including our historical and current results of operations, the status of the national and worldwide economy, the price of gold, silver and other valuable metals, the condition of the debt and equity markets, and the costs associated with extracting minerals. We may need financing and if so, may not be successful in generating or obtaining the required financing, or if we can obtain such financing, such financing may not be on terms that are favorable to us. Not having the cash available and/or failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further mining operations or exploration and construction and the possible partial or total loss of our interest in our properties.
If we do not hedge our exposure to fluctuations in gold and silver prices, we may be subject to significant reductions in price. We do not use hedging transactions with respect to any of our gold and silver production and we do not expect to do so in the future. Accordingly, we are fully exposed to price fluctuations if precious metal prices decline. While the use of hedging transactions limits the downside risk of price declines, their use also may limit future revenues from price increases. Hedging transactions also involve the risk that the counterparty may be unable to satisfy its obligations.
Competition in the mining industry is intense, and we have limited financial and personnel resources with which to compete. Competition in the mining industry for desirable properties, investment capital and experienced industry
8
personnel is intense. Numerous companies headquartered in the United States (“U.S.”) and elsewhere throughout the world compete for properties and personnel on a global basis. We are a small participant in the precious metal mining industry due to our limited financial and personnel resources. We presently operate with a limited number of personnel and we anticipate operating in the same manner going forward. We compete with other companies in our industry to hire qualified personnel when needed to successfully operate our mine and processing facility. We may be unable to attract the necessary investment capital or personnel to fully explore and, if warranted, develop and operate our properties and we may be unable to acquire other desirable properties. We believe that competition for acquiring mineral properties, as well as the competition to attract and retain qualified personnel, is likely to continue to be intense in the future.
Our ability to recognize the benefits of net losses is dependent on future cash flows and taxable income. We recognize deferred tax assets when the tax benefit is considered to be more likely than not of being realized; otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied against deferred tax assets. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows from operations and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, our ability to realize the deferred tax assets could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws could limit our ability to obtain the future tax benefits represented by our deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2021, we have not recorded a valuation allowance for our net deferred tax assets.
Our accounting and other estimates may be imprecise. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosure of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reporting periods. The more significant areas requiring the use of management assumptions and estimates relate to:
● | Mineral reserves, mineralized material, and other resources that are the basis for future income and cash flow estimates and units-of-production depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; |
● | Future ore grades, throughput and recoveries; |
● | Future metals prices; |
● | Future capital and operating costs; |
● | Environmental, reclamation and closure obligations; |
● | Permitting and other regulatory considerations; |
● | Asset impairment; and |
● | Deferred tax asset valuation impairment. |
Future estimates and actual results may differ materially from these estimates as a result of using different assumptions or conditions. For additional information, see Critical Accounting Estimates in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and the risk factors set forth in this report.
Our continuing reclamation obligations at our operations could require significant additional expenditures. We are responsible for the reclamation obligations related to disturbances located on all our properties. We have a liability on our balance sheet to cover the estimated reclamation obligations. However, there is a risk that any reserve could be inadequate to cover the actual costs of reclamation. Continuing reclamation obligations will require a significant amount of capital. There is a risk that we will be unable to fund these additional obligations. In addition, regulatory authorities may increase reclamation requirements to such a degree that it would not be commercially reasonable to continue mining and exploration activities, which may adversely affect our results of operations, financial performance and cash flows.
Operational Risks
Our production is currently limited to a single mine and any interruptions or stoppages in our mining activities would adversely affect our revenue. We are entirely dependent on revenues from a single mine to fund our operations. Any interruption in our ability to mine this location, such as a labor strike, natural disaster, or loss of permits would negatively impact our ability to generate revenue following such interruption. Additionally, if we are unable to discover new deposits and economically develop additional mines, we will eventually deplete our reserves and will no longer
9
generate revenue sufficient to fund our operations. A decrease in, or cessation of, our mining operations at this mine would adversely affect our financial performance and may eventually cause us to cease operations.
Our current property portfolio is limited to one producing property and our ability to remain profitable over the long-term will depend on our ability to expand and /or discover new deposits on this property, and /or identify, explore, discover, delineate and develop additional properties. Gold and silver producers must continually replace reserves depleted by production to maintain production levels over the long term and provide a return on invested capital. Depleted reserves can be replaced in several ways, including expanding known ore bodies, locating new deposits, or acquiring interests in reserves from third parties. Exploration is highly speculative in nature, capital intensive, involves many risks and is frequently unproductive. Our current or future exploration programs may not result in new ore reserves. Even if significant mineralization is discovered, it will likely take many years from the initial phases of exploration until commencement of production, during which time the economic feasibility and projections of production may change.
From time to time, we may acquire mineral interests from other parties. Such acquisitions are based on an analysis of a variety of factors including historical exploration results, estimates of and assumptions regarding the extent of mineralized material, and/or reserves, the timing of production from such reserves and cash and other operating costs. In addition, we may rely on data and reports prepared by third parties (including the ability to permit and compliance with existing regulations) which may contain information or data that we are unable to independently verify or confirm. All these factors are uncertain and may have an impact on our ability to develop the properties.
As a result of these uncertainties, our exploration programs and any acquisitions which we may pursue may not result in the expansion or replacement of our current production with new ore reserves or operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position and price of our common stock.
Estimates of proven and probable reserves are uncertain and the volume and grade of ore recovered may vary from our estimates. The proven and probable reserves stated in this Form 10-K report represent the amount of gold and silver we estimated, on December 31, 2021, that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Estimates of proven and probable reserves are subject to considerable uncertainty. Such estimates are, to a large extent, based on the market prices of gold and silver, as well as interpretations of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other exploration techniques. These prices and interpretations are subject to change. If we determine that certain of our estimated reserves have become uneconomic, we may be forced to reduce our estimates. Actual production may be significantly less than we expect.
Any material changes in mineral estimates and grades of mineralization may affect the economic viability of our current operations, our decision to place a new property into production and/or such property’s return on capital. There can be no assurance that mineral recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in a large-scale on-site operation in a production environment. Extended declines in market prices for gold or silver may render portions of our mineralization estimates uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization or adversely affect the commercial viability of one or more of our properties. Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of our ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and stock price.
If we are unable to achieve anticipated gold and silver production levels, our financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected. We have proceeded with the processing of ore from the Isabella Pearl mine, based on estimates from our Proven and Probable Reserve report. However, risks related to reserve estimates, metallurgy, and/or mining dilution are inherent when working with extractable minerals. Future revenue from sales of gold and silver will be less than anticipated if the mined material does not contain the concentration of gold and silver predicted by our geological exploration, studies, and reports. If revenue from sales of gold and silver are less than anticipated, we may not be able to recover our investment in our properties and our operations may be adversely affected. Our inability to realize production based on quarterly or annual projections may also adversely affect the price of our common stock.
10
Revenue from the sale of doré may be adversely affected by loss or damage during shipment and storage at our buyer’s facilities. We rely on third-party transportation companies to transport our doré to the buyer’s facilities for processing and further refining. The terms of our sales contracts with the buyers require us to rely on assay results from samples of our doré to determine the final sales value for our metals. Once the doré leaves our processing facility, we no longer have direct custody and control of these products. Theft, loss, road accidents, improper storage, fire, natural disasters, tampering or other unexpected events while in transit or at the buyer’s location may lead to the loss of all or a portion of our doré production. Such losses may not be covered by insurance and may lead to a delay or interruption in our revenue and as a result, our operating results may be adversely affected.
A significant delay or disruption in sales of doré as a result of the unexpected disruption in services provided by smelters or refiners could have a material adverse effect on results of operations. We rely on third party refiners and smelters to refine and process and, in some cases, purchase, the gold and silver doré produced from our mine. Access to refiners and smelters on economic terms is critical to our ability to sell our products to buyers and generate revenues. We periodically enter into agreements with refiners and smelters, some of which operate their refining or smelting facilities outside the United States, and we believe we currently have contractual arrangements with a sufficient number of refiners and smelters so that the loss of any one refiner or smelter would not significantly or materially impact our operations or our ability to generate revenues. Nevertheless, services provided by a refiner or smelter may be disrupted by operational issues, new or increased tariffs, duties or other cross-border trade barriers, the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more refiners or smelters or the inability to agree on acceptable commercial or legal terms with a refiner or smelter. Such an event or events may disrupt an existing relationship with a refiner or smelter or result in the inability to create a contractual relationship with a refiner or smelter, which may leave us with limited, uneconomical or no access to refining or smelting services for short or long periods of time. Any such delay or loss of access may significantly impact our ability to sell doré. We cannot ensure that alternative refiners or smelters would be available or offer comparable terms if the need for them were to arise or that it would not experience delays or disruptions in sales that would materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Exploration and, if deemed feasible, development of mineral properties is inherently risky and could lead to unproductive properties and/or capital investments. Our long-term success depends on our ability to identify additional mineral deposits on our properties and any other properties that we may acquire and to develop one or more of those properties into commercially viable mining operations. Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently unproductive. These risks include unusual or unexpected geologic formations and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment, or labor. The success of gold exploration is determined in part by the following factors:
● | The identification of potential gold mineralization based on surface and drill analysis; |
● | Availability of government-granted exploration and construction permits; |
● | The quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise; and |
● | The capital available for exploration and development. |
Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves through detailed drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes to extract metal and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, which include, without limitation, the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade, metallurgy, rock competency, waste rock overburden, and proximity to infrastructure such as power, water and roads; metal prices, which fluctuate widely; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals, environmental protection and local and community support. We may invest significant capital and resources in exploration activities and abandon such projects if we are unable to identify
11
commercially exploitable mineral reserves. The decision to abandon a project may have an adverse effect on the market value of our common stock and our ability to raise future financing.
We may acquire additional exploration stage properties and our business may be negatively impacted if reserves are not located on acquired properties. We have in the past, and may in the future, acquire exploration stage properties. There can be no assurance that reserves will be identified on any properties that we acquire. We may experience negative reactions from the financial markets if we acquire additional properties and reserves are not located on acquired properties. These factors may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and our financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that we seek to expand our operations and increase our reserves through acquisitions, we may experience issues in executing acquisitions or integrating acquired operations. From time to time, we examine opportunities to make selective acquisitions in order to provide increased returns to our shareholders and to expand our operations and reported reserves and, potentially, generate synergies. The success of any acquisition depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
● | Identifying suitable candidates for acquisition and negotiating acceptable terms; |
● | Obtaining approval from regulatory authorities and potentially our shareholders; |
● | Implementing our standards, controls, procedures, and policies at the acquired business and addressing any pre-existing liabilities or claims involving the acquired business; and |
● | To the extent the acquired operations are in a state or country in which we have not operated historically, understanding the regulations and challenges of operating in that new jurisdiction. |
There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any acquisitions successfully, or that any acquisition will achieve the anticipated synergies or other positive results. Any material problems that we encounter in connection with such an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, or trading price of our common stock.
We rely on contractors to conduct a significant portion of our operations and construction projects. A significant portion of our operations and construction projects are currently conducted in whole or in part by third party contractors. As a result, our operations are subject to a number of risks, some of which are outside our control, including:
● | The difficulty and inherent delay in replacing a contractor and its operating equipment in the event that either party terminates the agreement; |
● | Reduced control and oversight over those aspects of operations which are the responsibility of the contractor; |
● | Failure of a contractor to perform under its agreement; |
● | Interruption of operations and construction or increased costs in the event that a contractor ceases its business due to insolvency or other unforeseen events; |
● | Injuries or fatalities on the job as a result of the failure to implement or follow adequate safety measures; |
● | Failure of a contractor to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, to the extent it is responsible for such compliance; and |
● | Problems of a contractor with managing its workforce, labor unrest or other related employment issues. |
12
In addition, we may incur liability to third parties as a result of the actions of our contractors. The occurrence of one or more of these risks could adversely affect our results of operation, financial position, or trading price of our common stock.
Increased operating and capital costs could adversely affect our results of operations. Costs at any particular mining location are subject to fluctuation due to a number of factors, such as variable ore grade, changing metallurgy and revisions to mine plans in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body, as well as the age and utilization rates for the mining and processing- related facilities and equipment. In addition, costs are affected by the price and availability of input commodities, such as fuel, electricity, labor, chemical reagents, explosives, steel, concrete and mining and processing related equipment and facilities. Commodity costs are, at times, subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. Further, changes in laws and regulations can affect commodity prices, uses and transport. Reported costs may also be affected by changes in accounting standards. A material increase in costs could have a significant effect on our results of operation and operating cash flow. We could have significant increases in capital and operating costs over the next several years in connection with the development of new projects and in sustaining and/or the expansion of existing mining and processing operations. Costs associated with capital expenditures may increase in the future as a result of factors beyond our control. Increased capital expenditures may have an adverse effect on the results of operation and cash flow generated from existing operations, as well as the economic returns anticipated from a new project.
Mining operations are subject to unique risks. The exploration for minerals, mine construction and mining operations, involve a high level of risk and are often affected by hazards outside of our control. Some of these risks include, but are not limited to, fires or floods, accidents, seismic activity and unexpected geological formations or conditions including noxious fumes or gases. The occurrence of one or more of these events in connection with our exploration, mine construction, or production activities may result in the death of, or personal injury to, our employees, other personnel or third parties, the loss of mining equipment, damage to or destruction of mineral properties or production facilities, monetary losses, deferral or unanticipated fluctuations in production, environmental damage and potential legal liabilities, all of which may adversely affect our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses. Exploration for and the production of minerals is highly speculative and involves greater risk than many other businesses. Many exploration programs do not result in the discovery of mineralization, and any mineralization discovered may not be of sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. Our operations are, and any future mining operations or construction we may conduct will be, subject to all the operating hazards and risks normally incident to exploring for and mining of mineral properties, such as, but not limited to:
● | Fluctuation in production costs that make mining uneconomic; |
● | Labor disputes; |
● | Unanticipated variations in grade and other geologic problems; |
● | Environmental hazards; |
● | Water conditions; |
● | Difficult surface or underground conditions; |
● | Industrial accidents; |
● | Metallurgic and other processing problems; |
● | Mechanical and equipment performance problems; |
13
● | Unusual or unexpected rock formations; |
● | Personal injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins and landslides; and |
● | Global pandemics such as the COVID-19 Coronavirus. |
Any of these risks can materially and adversely affect, among other things, the development of properties, production quantities and rates, costs and expenditures, potential revenues and targeted production dates. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur a write down of our investment in those interests and losses with respect to past or future expenses.
We do not, or cannot, insure against all of the risks to which we may be subject in our operations and development. While we currently maintain general commercial liability and property insurance in Nevada, we may be subject to liability for certain environmental, pollution or other hazards associated with mineral exploration and mine construction, and production for which insurance may not be available, which may exceed the limits of our insurance coverage, or which we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. We may also not be insured against all interruptions to our operations. Losses from these or other events may cause us to incur significant costs which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to fund activities on our properties. A significant loss could force us to reduce or suspend our operations and development.
Regulatory Risk Factors
Our operations are subject to permitting requirements which could result in the delay, suspension, or termination of our operations. Our operations, including our ongoing exploration drilling programs and production, require permits from numerous governmental authorities. If we cannot obtain or maintain the necessary permits or if there is a delay in receiving future permits, our timetable and business plan will be adversely affected. We have from time to time relied on third party environmental firms to assist in our efforts to obtain and remain current with required regulations and permits. While we attempt to manage and oversee third party firms, we are dependent on the firm to operate in a professional and knowledgeable manner.
Our activities are subject to significant environmental regulations, which could raise the cost of doing business or adversely affect our ability to develop our properties. Significant state and federal environmental laws and regulations in the U.S. may hinder our ability to explore, develop, and operate. Federal laws that govern mining claim location and maintenance and mining operations on federal lands are generally administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Additional federal laws, governing mine safety and health, also apply. State laws also require various permits and approvals before exploration, development or production operations can begin. Among other things, a reclamation plan must typically be prepared and approved with bonding in the amount of projected reclamation costs. The bond is used to ensure that proper reclamation takes place, and the bond will not be released until that time. Local jurisdictions may also impose permitting requirements (such as conditional use permits or zoning approvals).
Title to mineral properties can be uncertain. Our ability to explore and operate our properties depends on the validity of our title to that property. Our U.S. mineral properties include patented and unpatented mining claims. Unpatented mining claims provide only possessory title and their validity is often subject to contest by third parties or the federal government, which makes the validity of unpatented mining claims uncertain and generally riskier. Uncertainties inherent in mineral properties relate to such things as the sufficiency of mineral discovery, proper posting and marking of boundaries, assessment work and possible conflicts with other claims not determinable from public record. There may be valid challenges to the title to our properties which, if successful, could impair development and/or operations.
Changes in environmental regulations could adversely affect our cost of operations or result in operational delays. The regulatory environment in which we operate is evolving in a manner that will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. New environmental laws and regulations or changes in existing environmental laws and regulations could have a negative effect on exploration activities, operations, production levels and methods of production.
14
We cannot predict at this time what changes, if any, to federal laws or regulations may be adopted or imposed by the Biden Administration. We cannot provide any assurance that future changes in environmental laws and regulations will not adversely affect our current operations or future projects. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating constraints, technical criteria, fees or financial assurance requirements.
Construction of mine and process facilities is subject to all of the risks inherent in construction and start-up, including delays and costs of construction in excess of our projections. When applicable, many factors could delay or prevent the start or completion of, or increase the costs of, future projects or ongoing construction projects at our mine and process facility, including:
● | Design, engineering and construction difficulties or delays; |
● | Cost overruns; |
● | Inflation; |
● | Our failure or delay in obtaining necessary legal, regulatory and other approvals; |
● | Interruptions in the supply of the necessary equipment, or construction materials or labor or an increase in their price; |
● | Injuries to persons and property; |
● | Opposition of local and or non-governmental-organization interests; and |
● | Natural disasters, accidents, political unrest, or unforeseen events. |
If any of the foregoing events, or unforeseen others, were to occur, our financial condition could be adversely affected and we may be required to seek additional capital, which may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to complete such construction, we may not be able to recover any costs already incurred. Even if construction of a mine and processing facility is completed as scheduled, the costs could exceed our expectations and result in a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price may be volatile and as a result you could lose part or all of your investment. In addition to other risk factors identified and due to volatility associated with equity securities in general, our stock prices could decline due to the impact of numerous factors, including:
● | Changes in the worldwide price for gold and/or silver; |
● | Timely permit issuances; |
● | Adverse results from our exploration, development, or production efforts; |
● | Producing at rates lower than those targeted; |
● | Political and regulatory risks; |
● | Government freezes on issuing resource permits; |
● | Weather conditions, including earthquakes or unusually heavy rains; |
15
● | Failure to meet our revenue or profit goals or operating budget; |
● | Decline in demand for our common stock; |
● | Downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or changes in general market conditions; |
● | Decrease or elimination of our shareholder dividend; |
● | Technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies; |
● | Investor perception of our industry or our prospects; |
● | Lawsuits; |
● | Actions by government or central banks; and |
● | General economic trends. |
Stock markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of individual securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As a result, you may be unable to sell your shares at a desired price.
Issuances of our stock in the future could dilute existing shareholders and adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Our Directors have the authority to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, and to issue options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock without shareholder approval. As of February 28, 2022, there were 23,997,876 outstanding shares of common stock, 385,332 options issued and outstanding, no outstanding shares of preferred stock and no warrants. Future issuances of our securities could be at prices substantially below the price paid for our common stock by our current shareholders. The issuance of a significant amount of our common stock may have a disproportionately large impact on our share price compared to larger companies.
Awards of our shares and stock options to employees may not have their intended effect. A portion of our total compensation program for our executive officers and key personnel includes the award of shares and options to buy shares of our common stock. If the price of our common stock performs poorly, such performance may adversely affect our ability to retain or attract critical personnel. In addition, any changes made to our stock option policies or to any other of our compensation practices which are made necessary by governmental regulations or competitive pressures could affect our ability to retain and motivate existing personnel and recruit new personnel.
Our directors and officers may be protected from certain types of lawsuits. The laws of Colorado provide that our directors will not be liable to us or our shareholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as directors of the company. Our bylaws permit us to indemnify our directors and officers against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. The exculpation provisions of these items may have the effect of preventing shareholders from recovering damages against our directors caused by their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances. The indemnification provisions may require us to use our limited assets to defend our directors and officers against claims, including claims arising out of their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances.
We may issue shares of preferred stock that would have a liquidation preference to our common stock. Our Articles of Incorporation currently authorize the issuance of 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board of directors has the power to issue shares without shareholder approval, and such shares can be issued with such rights, preferences, and limitations as may be determined by our board of directors. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of any holders of preferred stock that may be issued in the future. As of February 28, 2022, there was no preferred stock outstanding.
16
Although we presently have no commitments or agreements to issue any shares of preferred stock, authorized and unissued preferred stock could delay, discourage, hinder or preclude an unsolicited acquisition of our Company, could make it less likely that shareholders receive a premium for their shares as a result of any such attempt, and could adversely affect the market prices of, and the voting and other rights, of the holders of our shares of common stock.
Our Shareholder Rights Agreement may not be in the best interest of our shareholders. On October 15, 2020, we adopted a Shareholders Rights Agreement, commonly called a "Poison Pill", and declared a dividend of one Series A Right and one Series B Right, or collectively the Rights, for each share of our common stock which was outstanding on October 15, 2020. The Rights have certain anti-takeover effects and will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The effect of the Rights may be to discourage a third party from attempting to obtain a substantial position in our common stock or seeking to obtain control of us. To the extent any potential acquisition is deterred by the Rights, the Rights may make the removal of management difficult even if the removal would be considered beneficial to our shareholders generally and may have the effect of limiting shareholder participation in certain transactions such as mergers or tender offers if these transactions are not favored by our management.
You may have difficulty depositing your shares with a broker or selling shares of our common stock. Many securities brokers will not accept securities for deposits and will not sell securities which trade in the over-the-counter market.
Further, for a securities broker which will accept deposit and agree to sell such securities in the over-the-counter market under certain circumstances, such broker may first require the customer to complete a questionnaire detailing how the customer acquired the shares, provide the securities broker with an opinion of an attorney concerning the ability of the shares to be sold in the public market, and pay a “legal review” fee which in some cases can exceed $1,000.
For these reasons, shareholders may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock.
General Risk Factors
We are dependent upon information technology systems, which are subject to disruption, damage, failure, and risks associated with implementation and integration. We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our operations. Our information technology systems are subject to disruption, damage, or failure from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, and defects in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and the corruption of data. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to information technology systems and network disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information technology disruptions, we could potentially be subject to production downtimes, operational delays, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations.
We may also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded information technology systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into our operations. If we are not able to successfully implement system upgrades or modifications, we may have to rely on manual reporting processes and controls over financial reporting that have not been planned, designed, or tested. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to the system upgrades and modifications, but system upgrades and modification failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could, if not successfully implemented, adversely impact the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.
The facilities and development of our mine and operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in development, construction, and operations. These risks include potential delays, cost overruns, shortages of material or labor, construction defects, breakdowns and injuries to persons and property. We expect to engage subcontractors and material
17
suppliers in connection with the continued mine activities at the Isabella Pearl Mine. While we anticipate taking all measures which we deem reasonable and prudent in connection with our operating facilities, construction of future mines and the operation of current and future processing facilities, there is no assurance that the risks described above will not cause delays or cost overruns in connection with such construction or operation. Any delays would postpone our anticipated generation of revenue and adversely affect our operations, which in turn may adversely affect our financial position and the price of our common stock.
We depend upon our management and key employees and the loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect our business. We are dependent on our executive officers and other key employees for our operations. If any of these individuals were to die, become disabled or leave our company, we would be forced to identify and retain individuals to replace them. There is no assurance that we can find suitable individuals to replace them or to add to our employee base if that becomes necessary. Competition for industry professionals is fierce. We have no life insurance on any individual, and we may be unable to hire a suitable replacement on favorable terms should that become necessary.
The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our operations depending on the severity and longevity of the pandemic. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a respiratory disease caused by a new novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a pandemic.
Precious metal mining is considered essential to support critical infrastructure under guidelines from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the State of Nevada. As a result, the Isabella Pearl Mine in Nevada has continued to operate at full capacity.
As of the date of this report, there have been no significant COVID-19 impacts, including impairments, to our operations and financial statements. However, the long-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the outbreak and related advisories and restrictions. These developments and the impact of COVID-19 on the financial markets and the overall economy are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. If the financial markets and/or the overall economy are impacted for an extended period, our results of operations, financial position and cash flows may be materially adversely affected. We are not able to estimate the duration of the pandemic and potential impact on our business if disruptions or delays in business developments and shipments of product occur. In addition, a severe prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including a decreased ability to raise capital when and if needed on acceptable terms, if at all.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
18
Item 2. Properties
Properties Overview
We classify our mineral properties into three categories: “Operating Properties”, “Development Properties”, and “Exploration Properties”. Operating Properties are properties with material extraction of mineral reserves. Development Properties are properties that have mineral reserves disclosed, but no material extraction. Exploration Properties are properties that have no mineral reserves disclosed. We consider Isabella Pearl and Golden Mile to be material properties under SK-1300 due to Isabella Pearl being our only operating property and Golden Mile being in the resource definition, engineering and permitting phase. Our other properties are not considered material under SK 1300 due to their earlier stages of exploration. As of the date of this report we did not have any Development Properties.
The map above shows the location of our properties within the state of Nevada.
19
Nevada
In Nevada, we are the owner of six properties totaling 1,724 unpatented mining claims covering approximately 32,178 acres, subject to the paramount title of the United States of America, under the administration of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). Under the Mining Law of 1872, which governs the location of unpatented mining claims on federal lands, the owner (locator) has the right to explore, develop, and mine minerals on unpatented mining claims without payments of production royalties to the U.S. government, subject to the surface management regulation of the BLM. Currently, annual claim maintenance fees are the only federal payments related to unpatented mining claims. Annual maintenance fees of $305,865 were paid during 2021.
In addition to the unpatented claims, we also own 26, and lease one, patented mining claims covering approximately 165 acres and an additional 201 acres of fee lands in Mineral County, Nevada. Patented claims and fee lands unlike unpatented claims, pass title to the holder. The patented claims and fee lands are subject to payment of annual property taxes made to the county where they are located. Annual property taxes on our patented claims and fee lands have been paid through June 30, 2022.
Activities at our properties in Nevada range from exploration at East Camp Douglas, County Line and Ripper, mineral delineation at Mina Gold, resource definition, engineering and permitting at Golden Mile to production at Isabella Pearl. We believe that our portfolio of Nevada properties has excellent potential for additional discoveries of both bulk tonnage replacement-type and bonanza-grade vein-type gold deposits, similar to other gold deposits historically mined in the nearby Paradise Peak, Borealis, Bodie, Tonopah, Goldfield and Rochester districts.
Our primary focus is to discover, delineate and advance potential open pit heap leach gold operations in Nevada and commence production on all properties where we discover economic deposits. We believe that our property portfolio is highly prospective based on geology, surface samples, and drill results. Our properties’ close proximity, especially between our producing and prospective Walker Lane Mineral Belt properties (approximately 50 kilometers or 30 miles or less in radius) may allow for equipment sharing and synergies whereby we may move equipment and business resources from one project to the next.
20
The map above shows our five properties located in the Walker Lane Mineral Belt which is known for its significant and high-grade gold and silver deposits.
Isabella Pearl, Nevada, USA. (100% owned) Isabella Pearl, located approximately 10 km (6 mi) north of the town of Luning in Mineral County, Nevada at latitude N38.60°, longitude W118.18° (UTM 397,665 E, 4,273,011 N, Zone 11) is an open pit operation. The Isabella Pearl operation covers an area of 9,777 acres (3,957 hectares) consisting of 568 unpatented mining claims. The Isabella Pearl deposits belong to the high-sulfidation class of epithermal mineral deposits. Processing facilities include a heap leach with a crushing circuit located on site. Gold production from Isabella Pearl for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 was 46,459, 29,479, and 10,883 ounces, respectively. Isabella Pearl reported 121,500 ounces of gold reserves as of December 31, 2021.
Golden Mile, Nevada, USA. (100% owned) Golden Mile is located in the Bell Mining District, Mineral County, Nevada, approximately 35 km (22 mi) east of the town of Luning in Mineral County, Nevada at latitude N38.51°, longitude W 117.77° (UTM 433,190 E, 4,262,848 N, Zone 11). The property covers an area of approximately 11,811 acres (4,780 hectares) consisting of 599 unpatented and 5 patented claims, 4 owned and one leased. Mineralization at Golden Mile is intrusion related, with primary gold and copper mineralization associated with skarn style replacement in carbonate units. Secondary mineralization is associated with structurally controlled stockwork and breccia zones. In November 2021, we disclosed our maiden Mineral Resource estimate for Golden Mile consisting of 78,500 Indicated gold ounces at 1.13 g/t Au and 84,500 Inferred gold ounces at 1.10 g/t Au.
Mina Gold, Nevada, USA. (100% owned) Mina Gold is also located in the Bell Mining District, Mineral County, Nevada, approximately 25 km (16 mi) east of the town of Luning in Mineral County, Nevada. Our current land position covers 1,624 acres (657 hectares) which includes 74 unpatented lode mining claims and 5 patented mining claims, which
21
we own. Gold mineralization at Mina Gold is hosted by epithermal quartz veins occurring along fault zones in volcanic host rock outcropping at the surface. Our drilling has encountered gold at shallow depths <60 m (197 ft) including 15.24 m (50 ft) of 3.34 g/t Au from surface and 12.19 m (40 ft) 2.98 g/t Au from 6.10 m (20 ft) downhole.
County Line, Nevada, USA. (100% owned) County Line is located approximately 30 km (19 mi) northeast of the town of Luning, Nevada. The property land package is 2,320 acres (939 hectares) consisting of 116 unpatented lode mining claims and 6 unpatented placer mining claims located in Mineral and Nye counties, Nevada. The property is part of the Paradise Peak district of high sulfidation epithermal deposits. The district historically produced a total of 1.5 million ounces of gold. County Line historically produced a total of 88,400 ounces of gold from two open pits.
East Camp Douglas, Nevada, USA. (100% owned) East Camp Douglas is located approximately 10 km (6 mi) southwest of the town of Mina in Mineral County, Nevada. The property covers an area of 5,571 acres (2,255 hectares) consisting of 289 unpatented claims, 16 patented claims and additional fee lands. Epithermal gold-silver mineralization at East Camp Douglas occurs as both widespread high sulfidation alteration areas and low sulfidation veins. Our exploration efforts have focused on understanding geologic structures associated with the silicified lithocap located on the southern end of the East Camp Douglas property.
The map above shows the location of our Ripper property.
Ripper, Nevada, USA. (100% owned) Ripper is located approximately 40 km (25 mi) from the town of Lovelock in west-central Nevada. The property is close to our other Walker Lane Mineral Belt properties and consists of 72 unpatented lode mining claims covering approximately 1,400 acres (567 hectares) in Pershing and Churchill counties, Nevada. Our initial exploration focus will be on understanding the lithological, structural and alteration characterization of historic gold mineralization occurring in the property’s Hughes Canyon target area.
22
Glossary
The following terms used in this report have the following meanings:
ADR | An adsorption, desorption, and recovery (“ADR”) facility which recovers gold from the leached pregnant solution. |
Dore: | Composite gold and silver bullion usually consisting of approximately 90% precious metals that will be further refined to separate pure metals. |
Epithermal: | Used to describe gold deposits found on or just below the surface close to vents or volcanoes, formed at low temperature and pressure. |
Exploration: | Prospecting, sampling, mapping, diamond-drilling and other work involved in locating the presence of economic deposits and establishing their nature, shape, and grade. |
Grade: | The concentration of an element of interest expressed as relative mass units (percentage, ounces per ton, grams per tonne (“g/t”), etc.). |
Heap Leaching: | Consists of stacking crushed or run-of-mine ore on impermeable pads, where a weak cyanide solution is applied to the surface of the heap to dissolve the gold. The gold-bearing solution is then collected and pumped to process facilities to remove the gold by collection on carbon. |
Mineral Deposit: | Rocks that contain economic amounts of minerals in them and that are expected to be profitably mined. |
Patented Claim: | A mining claim for which the U.S. Federal Government has passed its title to the claimant, making it private land. A person may mine and remove minerals from a mining claim without a mineral patent. However, a mineral patent gives the owner exclusive title to the locatable minerals and in most cases, grants title to the surface. |
Run-of-Mine ore: | Common lower grade ore in the deposit that does not warrant crushing. |
Ton: | One ton equals 2,000 pounds. |
Tonne: | One tonne equals 2,204.62 pounds. |
Unpatented Claim: | A particular parcel of U.S. Federal land, valuable or believed to be valuable for a specific mineral deposit or deposits. It is a parcel for which an individual has asserted a right of possession. The right is restricted to the extraction and development of a mineral deposit. |
Operating Property
Isabella Pearl
The Isabella Pearl Mine is our only operating property.
History: The Isabella Pearl mine is in the Santa Fe Mining District. Although the district was discovered in the late 19th century, no work on the Isabella Pearl mine area was done until the 1930’s when the Gilbert brothers completed a 120 m (400 ft) drift at Isabella. The brothers encountered up to one ounce of gold per ton in spots, but no economic material
23
was produced. Modern exploration and development of the general area around the Isabella Pearl mine began in the early 1970’s by various companies. The Isabella mine was held by B. Narkaus until 1978 and was subsequently leased by Joe Morris the same year. Mr. Morris and three partners re-located some of the Isabella claims and subsequently leased them to the Combined Metals Reduction Company (Combined Metals). From 1987 through 1990, Combined Metals Reduction Company drilled the Isabella Pearl mine area during its joint venture with Homestake Mining Company. A total of 22,427.3 m (73,587 ft) of reverse circulation and diamond core drilling has been performed at the Isabella Pearl property prior to acquisition by the Company.
Background: In August 2016, we purchased Walker Lane Minerals Corp., which owns a 100% interest in the Isabella Pearl Mine which covers an area of 8,891 acres consisting of 496 unpatented claims. Since acquisition, we have staked an additional 72 claims to expand our land holding to 9,777 acres. In April 2018, we released our maiden Proven and Probable mineral reserve estimate for the Isabella Pearl Mine totaling 192,600 gold ounces at an average grade of 2.22 g/t. In 2019, we commenced production of gold doré from an open pit heap leach operation. Based on metallurgical testing, we expect ultimate gold recoveries of approximately 81% for crushed ore and 60% for the run-of-mine (“ROM”) ore. The Isabella Pearl Mine is subject to a 2.75% net smelter return royalty.
Location and Access: The Isabella Pearl Mine is located in the Gabbs Valley Range in Mineral County, Nevada approximately 240 kilometers (150 miles) southeast of Reno, Nevada. Access to the project is by a paved road approximately 10-kilometer (6 miles) north of the town of Luning, Nevada. The project has good connections to the infrastructure of west-central Nevada, with access roads to the project site linking to Nevada state route 361 and U.S. Route 95, the main highway between Reno and Las Vegas, Nevada.
Geology and Mineralization: The Isabella Pearl Mine is located in the central portion of the Walker Lane Mineral Belt, a major northwest-trending zone on the western border of Nevada characterized by a series of closely spaced dextral strike-slip faults that were active throughout much of the middle to late Cenozoic period. Volcanic rocks of middle Tertiary age cover much of the property and include intermediate lava flows and ignimbrite ash-flow sheets. The volcanic rocks unconformably overlie Mesozoic strata including Triassic and Jurassic sedimentary units and Cretaceous and Jurassic igneous units. Within the regional Walker Lane tectonic setting, several major fault zones trend through the property and are dominated by various splays and offset branches that host the gold mineralization in the area.
The gold-silver mineralized zones mainly include the Isabella, Pearl, and Civit Cat deposits, collectively referred to as the Isabella Pearl deposit. Alteration and mineral assemblages at Isabella Pearl, including widespread argillic alteration and generally abundant alunite, indicate the deposits belong to the high-sulfidation class of epithermal mineral deposits. Potassium-Argon age determinations indicate the mineralization is about 19 million years, some 7 to 10 million years younger than the age of the host rocks. This early Miocene age conforms to the age of other high-sulfidation epithermal precious-metal deposits in the Walker Lane (e.g., Goldfield and Paradise Peak).
Facilities: We were granted a positive Record of Decision (“ROD”) from the BLM on the Environmental Assessment (“EA”) for the Isabella Pearl Mine in May 2018. This final permit allowed us to move the project forward into development and construction. Construction progress in 2018 included the completion of haul roads, office and laboratory buildings, construction of and liner placement on the heap leach pad, the pregnant and barren solution ponds, and connection of the water well. In 2018, we began installation of the Adsorption, Desorption and Recovery (ADR) processing facility, installed our crushing facility and commenced mining and waste removal of the first of several benches of the lower grade Isabella portion of the deposit with its estimated average grade of ~1 g/t gold. Power is currently supplied by three diesel-powered electric generators. Fuel for the generators is stored in two above-ground tanks on graded areas with HDPE-lined floors and berms for secondary containment to provide emergency capture of 110-percent of the largest fuel tank/vessel volume. Industrial water is supplied from three production water wells. We achieved first gold production approximately 10 months after breaking ground on the project. During the second quarter of 2020 our overburden removal reached the first benches in the high-grade Pearl portion of the deposit estimated at ~3.7 g/t average with a ~5.0 g/t gold core deeper in the deposit than currently in development. The net book value of the property at December 31, 2021 was $32.5 million.
Exploration Activities: In 2021, we continued to explore for additional mineral reserves at the Isabella Pearl Mine. During the year, we completed 92 holes totaling 8,391 meters of reverse circulation drilling. This mainly included in-fill
24
and step-out drill holes on the Scarlet, Isabella and Civit Cat targets. The majority of this drilling was conducted outside the current permitted mine plan.
Exploration Properties
Our exploration properties are all located in west-central Nevada with good connections to the infrastructure of west-central Nevada, with access roads to each project site. There is no plant or equipment on any of our exploration properties.
Golden Mile
History: The Golden Mile property is located within the Bell Mining District (also known as the Cedar Mountain District). The property has a long history which includes limited mining development, as well as a considerable amount of recent exploration activity including mapping, surface and underground sampling, geophysical surveys and drilling. This exploration activity was completed by several companies and has defined a significant area of gold mineralization associated with skarn development and gold stockwork mineralization along intrusive contact zones with surrounding sediments. A total of 20,156.7 m (66,131 ft) of air rotary, reverse circulation and diamond core drilling has been performed at the Golden Mile property prior to acquisition by the Company. This included work by Standard Slag, the Elmwood JV, Battle Mountain, USMX, Teck, Cordex, Roscan and Kinross companies. The vast majority of the drilling has been directed towards the Main Zone, located on the patented mineral claims.
Background: On June 15, 2020, we purchased a 100% interest in the Golden Mile property located in Nevada’s Walker Lane Mineral Belt. The property is subject to a 3% net smelter return royalty. The property covers an area of approximately 9,300 acres consisting of 451 unpatented and 5 patented claims, 4 owned and one leased. Since acquisition, we have staked an additional 148 unpatented claims to expand our land holding to 11,811 acres. The property is located in the Bell Mining District, Mineral County, Nevada, approximately 36 kilometers (22 miles) east of the town of Luning, Nevada. Mineralization at the property is intrusion related, with primary gold and copper mineralization associated with skarn style replacement in carbonate units. Secondary mineralization is associated with structurally controlled stockwork and breccia zones. The “Golden Mile Stock” quartz diorite-granodiorite body is believed to be responsible for the gold-copper skarn mineralization. The stock is only exposed on surface in three small areas because most of its northern extent is covered by Tertiary volcanics. In 2021, we continued our surface diamond drilling program in the mineral resource area on the patented claims. We completed seven diamond drill holes totaling 924 meters for collection of material for metallurgical testing and resource definition. In 2021, we also completed 58 reverse circulation (RC) holes totaling 8,327 meters for further resource definition. We continue to evaluate the known mineralized zones among a much larger conceptual project plan of multiple open pits along a trend at Golden Mile to the northwest and onto the Mina Gold property. We are evaluating the potential of at least three pits feeding ore to a strategically located heap leach and process facility. The conceptualized process plant is being evaluated to take the gold to the carbon stage and then haul the carbon for processing at our ADR facility at Isabella Pearl for final doré production. Base line and background studies are being evaluated and budgeted alongside exploration efforts to move this property forward. In 2021, we disclosed our maiden Mineral Resource estimate for Golden Mile conforming to the newly adopted Securities and Exchange Commission’s SK 1300 regulations. Our estimates of in-situ ounces consist of 78,500 Indicated gold ounces at 1.13 g/t and 84,500 Inferred gold ounces at 1.10 g/t. The initial Mineral Resource is located on patented claims and mineralization remains open both on strike and at depth, extending on to adjoining unpatented lode mining claims. Condemnation RC drilling commenced in 2021 to confirm locations for heap leach pad, process facilities and waste storage facilities. In 2022, we are planning further definition RC drilling to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves and test the depth and strike extent of the deposit.
Accessibility and Transportation to the Property: The Golden Mile property is accessible, in part, by highway and maintained county dirt and gravel roads. The property can be reached from Hawthorne via Highway 95 east to Luning, then northeast on Nevada Highway 361, then south on gravel Nevada State Road 89 about 24 mi to an unimproved dirt road which leads westward to the property. Alternatively, from Tonopah, travel 3 mi west on U.S. Highway 95 to gravel Road 89, then northwest to about 43 mi to the unimproved road leading west to the property. Both Hawthorne and Tonopah offer motel accommodations, restaurants, grocery stores and other services as well as fuel and other supplies. They are each the county seat for the respective counties of Mineral and Nye.
25
Infrastructure: The closest power lines are located 5 mi to the east in lone Valley. Future power needs for a proposed project at Golden Mile would likely require diesel powered generation. Perennial streams are not present in the Golden Mile property area; however, there are a number of springs within the project area. Drilling activities have identified potential groundwater sources for any future mine production and processing requirements. Hydrogeologic studies are currently ongoing to further characterize groundwater resources in the project area. Production water for the project will likely come from a groundwater well to be drilled on the Golden Mile property. Our exploration disturbance activities utilize existing roads and disturbed areas to the extent possible, including pre-existing drill roads utilized by prior exploration companies within the Golden Mile property area. Access roads, drill pads and sumps have been constructed with earthmoving equipment. The net book value of property at December 31, 2021 was $0.7 million.
Mina Gold
In August of 2016, we purchased a 100% interest in the Mina Gold property located in Nevada’s Walker Lane Mineral Belt. The property is subject to a net smelter return royalty ranging from 2% to 3%. The property has the potential to be a future open pit heap leach gold operation. In 2021, we continued to evaluate the known mineralized zone among a much larger conceptual plan of multiple open pits along a trend to the southeast onto the Golden Mile property which will feed ore to a strategically located heap leach and process facility. The conceptualized process plant is being evaluated to take the gold to carbon stage and then haul the carbon for processing at our ADR facility at Isabella Pearl for final doré production. Base line and background studies are being evaluated and budgeted.
County Line
In March 2018, we purchased a 100% interest in the County Line property. The property is located close to our other Nevada properties in central Nevada’s Walker Lane Mineral Belt in Mineral and Nye counties. The property is subject to a 3% net smelter return royalty. In addition, we staked additional unpatented claims around the property to strengthen the land position and exploration potential. During 2021, we continued to review historical geological, exploration and mining data in preparation for an initial surface drilling program at County Line.
East Camp Douglas
In January 2017, we purchased a 100% interest in the East Camp Douglas gold property located in Nevada’s Walker Lane Mineral Belt. The property is subject to a net smelter return royalty ranging from 1% to 3%. The property covers an area of 5,571 acres consisting of 289 unpatented claims, 16 patented claims and additional fee lands in Mineral County, Nevada. Precious metal epithermal mineralization at East Camp Douglas occurs as both widespread high sulfidation alteration areas and low sulfidation veins. Modern exploration by several mining and exploration companies has established modest gold resource potential in at least five separate areas on the property, with over 3,000 meters of drill core and a large exploration database. We believe this large property has numerous untested gold targets with open pit heap leach potential warranting an extensive exploration program. In 2020, we completed a reconnaissance drill program looking primarily for geologic structures with 11 holes totaling 1,565 meters targeting three general areas: Discovery Breccia, Gypsum Shaft and D2 Cliffs. These mineralized zones returned significant drill results including 17.92 meters grading 1.29 g/t gold hosted in brecciated vuggy silicified volcanic rock with a high degree of oxidation. In 2021, we evaluated drill results and commenced planning for follow-up drilling to evaluate the resource potential of the gold-bearing silicified volcanic rocks of the lithocap target area.
Ripper
In June 2021, we purchased a 100% interest in the Ripper property straddling the Pershing and Churchill county line in west-central Nevada. The property is subject to a 3% net smelter return royalty. The property is close to our other Walker Lane Mineral Belt properties and consists of 72 unpatented lode mining claims covering approximately 1,400 acres. Known gold mineralization at Ripper occurs in a Triassic package of limestones, limestone collapse breccias, and mudstones of the Auld Lang Syne group. Three principal types of alteration carrying gold values include jasperoidization and quartz veining within limestone beds, mudstone breccia with a quartz-calcite cement or en echelon quartz veins, and variably silicified and hematitic limestone collapse breccias. Recent surface rock chip samples have returned values up to
26
6.3 g/t gold. During 2021, we reviewed historical geological and exploration data in preparation for fieldwork in 2022 and a future initial surface drilling program.
Mineral Reserves and Resources
The SEC has adopted amendments to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, and related guidance, under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This report is prepared to comply with the new rule (17 CFR subpart 229.1300 Regulation S-K), generally known as the “SK-1300 rule”, requiring that a registrant with material mining operations must disclose specified information in Securities Act and Exchange Act filings concerning its Mineral Resources, in addition to its Mineral Reserves.
27
Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (metric units)
A Mineral reserve is an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted.
As of December 31, 2021, our estimate of Proven and Probable (“P&P”) reserves, all of which pertain to the Isabella Pearl Mine, was:
Notes to the 2021 P&P reserves:
1. | Metal prices used for P&P reserves were $1,738 per ounce of gold and $23.22 per ounce of silver. These prices reflect the consensus 2022-2024 average prices for gold and silver (CIBC Global Mining Group, Analyst Consensus Commodity Price Forecasts, November 30, 2021). |
2. | Gold equivalent is 74.85:1 determined by taking gold ounces produced or sold, plus silver ounces produced or sold converted to gold equivalent ounces using the gold to silver average price ratio for the period. |
3. | For the Isabella Pearl Mine, the quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cutoff grade of 0.33 Au g/t. |
4. | Mining, processing, energy, administrative and smelting/refining costs were based on 2021 actual costs for the Isabella Pearl Mine. |
5. | Metallurgical gold recovery assumptions used for the Isabella Pearl Mine were 81% for all ore which is currently being crushed. These recoveries reflect predicted average recoveries from metallurgical test programs. |
6. | Isabella Pearl P&P reserves are diluted and factored for expected mining recovery. |
7. | Figures in tables are rounded to reflect estimate precision and small differences generated by rounding are not material estimates. |
28
For comparison, at December 31, 2020, our estimate of P&P reserves was:
Notes to the 2020 P&P reserves:
1. | Metal prices used for P&P reserves were $1,477 per ounce of gold and $17.47 per ounce of silver. These prices reflect the three-year trailing average prices for gold and silver. |
2. | Gold equivalent is 84.54:1 determined by taking gold ounces produced or sold, plus silver ounces produced or sold converted to gold equivalent ounces using the gold to silver average price ratio for the period. |
3. | For the Isabella Pearl Mine, the quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cutoff grade of 0.38 Au g/t. |
4. | Mining, processing, energy, administrative and smelting/refining costs were based on 2020 actual costs for the Isabella Pearl Mine. |
5. | Metallurgical gold recovery assumptions used for the Isabella Pearl Mine were 81% for all ore which is currently being crushed. These recoveries reflect predicted average recoveries from metallurgical test programs. |
6. | Isabella Pearl P&P reserves are diluted and factored for expected mining recovery. |
7. | Figures in tables are rounded to reflect estimate precision and small differences generated by rounding are not material estimates. |
8. | 100% of the pit constrained Mineralized Material was converted to reserves. |
Mineral Resources Exclusive of Mineral Reserves (metric units)
A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. Confidence in the estimate of Inferred Mineral Resources is insufficient to allow the meaningful application of technical and economic parameters.
29
As of December 31, 2021, our estimate of Mineral Resources was:
Notes to the 2021 Mineral Resources:
1. | Metal prices used for P&P reserves were $1,738 per ounce of gold and $23.22 per ounce of silver. These prices reflect the consensus 2022-2024 average prices for gold and silver (CIBC Global Mining Group, Analyst Consensus Commodity Price Forecasts, November 30, 2021). |
2. | Gold equivalent is 74.85:1 determined by taking gold ounces produced or sold, plus silver ounces produced or sold converted to gold equivalent ounces using the gold to silver average price ratio for the period. |
3. | Reported at cutoffs of 0.33 g/t Au for Isabella Pearl Mine Oxide, 2.0 g/t Au for Isabella Pearl Mine Sulfide and 0.34 g/t Au for Golden Mile Property Oxide. |
4. | Whole block diluted estimates are reported within an optimized pit shell. |
30
5. | Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
6. | Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. |
7. | Mineral resources reported are exclusive of mineral reserves. |
No previous Mineral Resource estimates have been disclosed for comparison.
Future Exploration
Our properties are being explored at various stages at any given time. During the twelve months ending December 31, 2022, we anticipate spending approximately $5.7 million for exploration activities. Our primary focus in 2022 for our drill programs include testing exploration targets along the mineralized trend and structural corridor where our Isabella Pearl mine is located, planned delineation and expansion drilling of the known mineralized zones at Golden Mile and exploration drilling at our East Camp Douglas property. Exploration expenditures may be modified depending on exploration results, metal market conditions and available capital.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
The information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this Annual Report.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
At times, there may be a limited public market for our common shares. In February 2021, we began trading on the OTC Markets Operated by the OTC Markets Group under the ticker symbol "FRTT", subsequently the symbol was changed to “FTCO”. Our common stock was subsequently up listed to the OTCQB on March 5, 2021. Trading in stocks quoted on the OTC market is often thin and is characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may be unrelated to a company’s operations or business prospects.
OTC market securities are not listed or traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC market securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks. OTC market issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.
As of February 28, 2022 the closing price of our common stock was $6.36.
Number of Holders
As of February 28, 2022, we had 23,997,876 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, held by 252 shareholders of record, with others holding shares in street name.
31
Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. is the transfer agent for our common stock. The principal office of Computershare is located at 6200 S. Quebec St., Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 and its telephone number is (303) 262-0600.
Dividends
Since our inception, one of management’s primary goals has been to make cash dividend distributions to shareholders. We instituted a monthly dividend in April 2021 and we returned over $7.3 million to our shareholders in consecutive monthly dividends in 2021. Regular dividends should not be considered a prediction or guarantee of future dividends and payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors after considering various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and plans for expansion. At the present time, we are not party to any agreement that would limit our ability to pay dividends.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Other Stockholder Matters
None.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not applicable.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for the historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. See “Cautionary Statement” in the forepart of this report. Our actual future results or actions may differ materially from these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including but not limited to the risks described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report and other reports filed by us with the SEC. This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we currently expect.
Introduction
We were incorporated in Colorado, U.S.A. and our subsidiaries are GRC Nevada Inc. (“GRCN”), Walker Lane Minerals Corp. (“WLMC”), County Line Holdings Inc. (“CLH”), County Line Minerals Corp. (“CLMC”) and Golden Mile Minerals Corp. (“GMMC”). WLMC, CLH, CLMC, and GMMC are wholly-owned subsidiaries of GRCN. We are a mining company which pursues gold and silver projects that are expected to have both low operating costs and high returns on capital.
Spin-Off from Gold Resource Corporation
Prior to December 31, 2020, we were a subsidiary of Gold Resource Corporation (“GRC”). On December 31, 2020, GRC completed the spin-off of our shares of common stock, which separated our business, activities and operations into a separate, public company. The spin-off was effected by the distribution of all of our outstanding shares of common stock
32
to GRC’s shareholders. GRC’s shareholders received one share of our common stock for every 3.5 shares of GRC’s common stock held as of December 28, 2020.
In February 2021, we began trading on the OTC Market operated by the OTC Markets Group under the ticker symbol "FRTT". Subsequently the symbol was changed to “FTCO”. Our common stock was subsequently up listed to the OTCQB on March 5, 2021.
The following discussion summarizes our results of operations for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, including GRCN prior to it becoming Fortitude Gold’s wholly-owned subsidiary on August 18, 2020. It also analyzes our financial condition at December 31, 2021.
2021 Financial Results and Highlights
● | $17.9 million net income or $0.75 per share; |
● | $40.0 million cash balance on December 31, 2021; |
● | $82.1 million net sales; |
● | Exceeded annual outlook with record gold production; |
● | 46,459 gold ounces and 44,553 silver ounces produced; |
● | $7.3 million cash dividends, three successive increases; |
● | 3.76 g/t average open pit grade mined; |
● | $76.0 million working capital; |
● | $40.6 million mine gross profit; |
● | $24.7 million cash from operating activities; |
● | $705 per ounce total all in sustaining cost; |
● | 104% exploration spending increase; and |
● | Released initial resource on the Golden Mile Property. |
Operating Data: The following tables summarize certain information about our operations at our Isabella Pearl Mine for the periods indicated:
(1) | The difference between what we report as “metal production” and “metal sold” is attributable to the difference between the quantities of metals contained in the doré we produce versus the portion of those metals actually paid for according to the terms of our sales contracts. Differences can also arise from inventory changes incidental to shipping schedules, or variances in ore grades and recoveries which impact the amount of metals contained in doré produced and sold. |
33
(1) | Average metal prices realized vary from the market metal prices due to final settlement adjustments from our provisional invoices when they are settled. Our average metal prices realized will therefore differ from the market average metal prices in most cases. |
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we produced 46,459 and 29,479 ounces of gold. The increased production is primarily due to higher leach pad recoveries due to higher grade ore placed on the pad and under the leaching process. We reached high-grade zone of the Pearl Phase 1 in the third quarter of 2020 and continued mining the Pearl Phase 1 for the first half of 2021 which was stockpiled at the end of the second quarter of 2021. This high-grade ore was processed in the second half of 2021 while we were mining waste from Pearl Phase 2.
Our grade of ore mined increased 55% in 2021 from 2020 as a result of the mining of the high-grade Phase 1 Pearl which was reached in the third quarter of 2020 and fully mined and stockpiled by the end of second quarter 2021. We processed this higher-grade ore in the second quarter of 2021 which resulted in more ounces recovered and sold in 2021 over 2020.
Gold ore grades vary depending on the areas of the Isabella Pearl Mine being mined at any given time. We have seen an expected increase of gold ore grades as we have reached the Pearl Phase 1. We began mining Pearl Phase 2 in the third quarter of 2021 and reached the mineralization in fourth quarter of 2021. Pearl Phase 2 gold grades are expected to be slightly lower than Pearl Phase 1
Consolidated Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020
Sales, net. For the year ended December 31, 2021, net sales were $82.1 million as compared to $54.0 million for the same period in 2020. The $28.1 million or 52% increase is primarily attributable to a 53% increase in sales volumes and was slightly offset by a 1% decrease in the average realized price of gold. For the year ended December 31, 2021, gold sales volumes increased 53% from the same period in 2020 as a result of higher-grade ore mined and processed, as noted above in “Operating Data”. Although average realized sales price of gold did not significantly decrease from 2020, significant changes in gold price could have a material impact on operations.
Mine cost of sales. For the year ended December 31, 2021, mine cost of sales totaled $41.5 million compared to $37.8 million for the same period in 2020. The change is mainly attributable to higher depreciation and amortization expenses due to an increase in sales volumes in 2021 as compared to 2020. The increase in depreciation and amortization was slightly offset by lower production costs as there was no net realizable value expense related to our inventory in 2021, whereas in 2020, we recorded a $3.6 million adjustment.
34
Mine gross profit. For the year ended December 31, 2021, mine gross profit totaled $40.6 million compared to $16.2 million for the same period in 2020. The change is attributable to higher sales and lower cash cost per gold ounce sold due to mining efficiencies and higher-grade ore mined in 2021 as compared to 2020 as well as no net realizable value expense related to our inventory in 2021 as noted above.
General and administrative. For the year ended December 31, 2021, general and administrative expenses totaled $11.4 million as compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2020. The increase was primarily the result of non-recurring stock-based compensation and onboarding incentive compensation totaling $5.5 million relating to building out the Company’s staffing needs post Spin-Off which was recognized in the first quarter. While the Company anticipated working under the MSA for a longer period, the Company believed it would be prudent to fully staff up during the first quarter. On April 21, 2021, the Company was delivered official notice from GRC that the MSA was being canceled. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Exploration expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2021, property exploration expenses totaled $5.4 million as compared to $2.6 million for the same period of 2020. The increase of $2.8 million is the result of increased drilling and other exploration activities at the Golden Mile and Isabella Pearl (Scarlet target) projects.
Other expense, net. For the year ended December 31, 2021, other expense, net of $0.2 million did not materially change from $0.2 million for the same period in 2020.
Income and mining tax expense. For the year ended December 31, 2021, income and mining tax expense was $5.7 million as compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2020. The increase is the result of our increased income before income and mining taxes and increased Nevada net proceeds of minerals tax as a result of increases metal sales. See Note 5 in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Net income. For the year ended December 31, 2021 we recorded a net income of $17.9 million as compared to $10.2 million in the corresponding period for 2020. The increase is due to the changes in our consolidated results of operations as discussed above.
COVID-19 Update
In March 2020, the World Health Organization classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic based on the rapid increase in global exposure. In response to the pandemic, many jurisdictions, including the United States, instituted restrictions on travel, public gatherings, and certain business operations.
During 2021 and 2020, and as of the date of this report, the mining industry is listed as an essential business in the state of Nevada. Accordingly, we continue to operate the Isabella Pearl Mine while utilizing safety measures and protocols. In an effort to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and protect the health and safety of our employees, contractors, and communities, we have taken precautionary measures including specialized training, social distancing, screening workers before they enter facilities, a work from home mandate where possible, and close monitoring of national and regional COVID-19 impacts and governmental guidelines. As our non-mining workforce is able to work remotely using various technology tools, we have been able to maintain our operations and internal controls over financial reporting and disclosures.
The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including widely available and utilized vaccines, the duration and severity of the pandemic and related restrictions, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Non-GAAP Measures
Throughout this report, we have provided information prepared or calculated according to U.S. GAAP and have referenced some non-GAAP performance measures which we believe will assist with understanding the performance of our business. These measures are based on precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold and include cash cost before by-product credits per ounce, total cash cost after by-product credits per ounce, and total all-in sustaining cost per ounce
35
(“AISC”). Because the non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Accordingly, these measures should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP.
Revenue generated from the sale of silver is considered a by-product of our gold production for the purpose of our total cash cost after by-product credits for our Isabella Pearl Mine. We periodically review our revenues to ensure that our reporting of primary products and by-products is appropriate. Because we consider silver to be a by-product of our gold production, the value of silver continues to be applied as a reduction to total cash costs in our calculation of total cash cost after by-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold. Likewise, we believe the identification of silver as by-product credits is appropriate because of its lower individual economic value compared to gold and since gold is the primary product we produce.
Total cash cost, after by-product credits, is a measure developed by the Gold Institute to provide a uniform standard for comparison purposes. AISC is calculated based on the current guidance from the World Gold Council.
Total cash cost before by-product credits includes all direct and indirect production costs related to our production of metals (including mining, milling and other plant facility costs, royalties, and site general and administrative costs) plus treatment and refining costs.
Total cash cost after by-product credits includes total cash cost before by-product credits less by-product credits, or revenues earned from silver.
AISC includes total cash cost after by-product credits plus other costs related to sustaining production, including sustaining exploration expenses and sustaining capital expenditures. We determined sustaining capital expenditures as those capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain current production and execute the current mine plan.
Cash cost before by-product credits per ounce, total cash cost after by-product credits per ounce and AISC are calculated by dividing the relevant costs, as determined using the cost elements noted above, by precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold for the periods presented.
Reconciliations to U.S. GAAP
The following table provides a reconciliation of total cash cost after by-product credits to total mine cost of sales (a U.S. GAAP measure) as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||
2021 |
| 2020 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Total cash cost after by-product credits | $ | 26,942 | $ | 27,792 | ||
Treatment and refining charges |
| (281) | (297) | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 14,728 | 10,241 | |||
Reclamation and remediation | 156 | 48 | ||||
Total consolidated mine cost of sales | $ | 41,545 | $ | 37,784 |
36
The following table presents a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures of total cash cost and AISC:
(1) | Production cost plus treatment and refining charges. |
(2) | Please see the tables below for a summary of our by-product revenue and by-product credit per precious metal equivalent ounces sold. |
(3) | Sustaining capital expenditures and sustaining exploration expenses divided by gold ounces sold. |
The following tables summarize our by-product revenue and by-product credit per precious metal gold ounce sold:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
(in thousands) | ||||||
By-product credits by dollar value: |
| |||||
Silver sales | $ | 1,069 | $ | 615 | ||
Total sales from by-products | $ | 1,069 | $ | 615 |
Year ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
(in thousands) | ||||||
By-product credits: |
| |||||
Silver sales | $ | 23 | $ | 21 | ||
Total by-product credits | $ | 23 | $ | 21 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Through December 31, 2020, our primary source of liquidity during development, construction and ramp up stages of the Isabella Pearl Mine was cash contributions from GRC. Since December 31, 2020, our liquidity has largely been impacted through operating activities. As production and sales from Isabella Pearl have continued to increase, so has our cash position. As of December 31, 2021, we had a cash position of $40.0 million compared to $27.8 million at December 31, 2020. The increase is primarily due to increased cash from operations.
As of December 31, 2021, we had positive working capital of $76.0 million, representing an increase of $34.1 million from a working capital balance of $41.9 million at December 31, 2020. Our working capital balance fluctuates as we use cash to fund our operations, financing and investing activities, including exploration, mine development and income taxes. With our working capital balance as of December 31, 2021, we believe that our liquidity and capital resources are adequate to fund our operations, exploration, capital, and corporate activities for the next twelve months.
37
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021 increased to $40.0 million from $27.8 million as of December 31, 2020, a net increase in cash of $12.2 million. The increase is primarily due to cash from operations, which was offset by cash spent on capital expenditures at Isabella Pearl, including the heap leach pad expansion, as well as $7.3 million cash paid for shareholder dividends.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $24.7 million, compared to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The primary difference is due to increased net income.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $4.5 million compared to $6.5 million during the same period in 2020. The decrease is primarily due to the completion of phase one Pearl mine development in 2020.
Net cash used in financing activities was $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $20.4 million net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net change is due to dividend payments in 2021, whereas in 2020, financing activities were substantially comprised of capital contributions from GRC. No such contributions were made in 2021.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2021, we had a $7.5 million off-balance sheet arrangement consisting of a $12.2 million surety bond off-set by a $4.7 million Reclamation Liability for future reclamation obligations for Isabella Pearl.
Accounting Developments
Recently issued accounting pronouncements have been evaluated and do not presently impact our financial statements and supplemental data.
COVID-19 Assessment
In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have reviewed and evaluated our long-lived assets for events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. As of December 31, 2021, we determined that no impairment indicators existed at the balance sheet date, as the pandemic-related restrictions are viewed as temporary and are not expected to have a material impact on our ability to recover the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets.
We have been closely monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts and potential impacts on our business. However, because of the changing developments with respect to the spread of COVID-19 and the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we are unable to predict the extent and duration of any potential adverse financial impact of COVID-19 on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Future developments could impact our assessment and result in material impairments to our long-lived assets.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities and contingencies at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. As a result, management is required to routinely make judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different conditions or assumptions. The following discussion pertains to accounting estimates management believes are most critical to the presentation of our financial position and results of operations that require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments.
38
Revenue
Doré sales are recognized upon the satisfaction of performance obligations, which occurs when control of the doré transfers to the customer and price and quantity are agreed upon. Transfer of control occurs once the customer takes possession of the doré. Doré sales are recorded using quoted metal prices, net of refining charges.
Proven and Probable Reserves
Critical estimates are inherent in the process of determining our reserves. Our reserves are affected largely by our assessment of future metals prices, as well as by engineering and geological estimates of ore grade, accessibility, and production cost. Metals prices are estimated at three-year trailing averages. Our assessment of reserves occurs annually, and we may utilize external audits in the future. Reserves are a key component in the valuation of our property, equipment and mine development and related depreciation rates.
Reserve estimates are used in determining appropriate rates of units-of-production depreciation, with net book value of many assets depreciated over remaining estimated reserves. Reserves are also a key component in forecasts, with which we compare estimated future cash flows to current asset values in an effort to ensure that carrying values are reported appropriately. Reserves are a culmination of many estimates and are not guarantees that we will recover the indicated quantities of metals or that we will do so at a profitable level.
Depreciation and Amortization
Capitalized costs are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method or unit-of-production (“UOP”) method at rates sufficient to depreciate such costs over the shorter of estimated productive lives of such assets or the useful life of the individual assets. Significant judgment is involved in the determination of the estimated life of the assets. Our estimates for reserves are a key component in determining our UOP rates. Our estimates of proven and probable ore reserves may change, possibly in the near term, resulting in changes to depreciation, depletion and amortization rates in future reporting periods. Productive lives range from 3 to 7 years, but do not exceed the useful life of the individual asset.
Please see Note 1 in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for depreciation rates of major asset categories.
Carrying Value of Stockpiles
Stockpiles represent ore that has been extracted from the mine and is available for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained ounces (based on assay data), and the estimated metallurgical recovery rates. Stockpile ore tonnages are verified by periodic surveys. Costs are added to stockpiles based on current mining costs, including applicable overhead and depreciation and amortization relating to mining operations and removed at each stockpile’s average cost per recoverable unit as material is processed.
We record stockpiles at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price based on short-term and long-term metals price assumptions that are applied to expected short-term (12 months or less) and long-term sales from stockpiles, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale.
Carrying Value of Ore on Leach Pad
Ore on the leach pad represents ore that has been mined and placed on the leach pad where a solution is applied to the surface of the heap to dissolve the gold. Costs are added to ore on the leach pad based on current mining costs, including applicable depreciation and amortization relating to mining operations. Costs are removed from ore on the leach pad as ounces are recovered based on the average cost per estimated recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad. Estimates of recoverable ore on the leach pad is calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the leach pad (measured tonnes added to the leach pad), the grade of ore placed on the leach pad (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage (based on ore
39
type). In general, the leach pad is estimated to recover between 60% and 81% of the contained ounces placed on the leach pad, depending upon whether run-of-mine or crushed ore is placed on the leach pad.
The metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis. We recorded write-downs to reduce the carrying value of leach pad inventory at our Isabella Pearl Mine to net realizable value of $3.6 million in 2020, as a component of Production Costs. These write-downs were primarily due to the expected lower realized ore grade during the ramp-up stage of the mining and processing activities. No net realizable value write-downs occurred in 2021.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, using a fair-value based approach when events and circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount of our assets may not be recoverable. The economic environment and commodity prices may be considered as impairment indicators for the purposes of these impairment assessments. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows from such asset or asset group is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss will be recorded in our consolidated statements of operations based on the difference between book value and the estimated fair value of the asset or asset group computed using discounted estimated future cash flows, or the application of an expected fair value technique in the absence of an observable market price. Future cash flows include estimates of recoverable quantities to be produced from estimated proven and probable mineral reserves, commodity prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), production quantities, production costs, and capital expenditures, all based on life-of-mine plans and projections. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. It is possible that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as actual future quantities of recoverable minerals, gold and other commodity prices, production levels and costs and capital are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties.
Asset Retirement Obligation
Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations, including legal and contractual obligations to reclaim, remediate, or otherwise restore properties at the time the property is removed from service. Accounting for reclamation and remediation obligations requires management to make estimates of the future costs that we will incur to complete the work required to comply with existing laws and regulations. Actual costs may differ from the amounts estimated. Reclamation costs are allocated to expense over the life of the related assets and are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimated present value resulting from the passage of time and revisions to the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation and remediation costs. Also, future changes to environmental laws and regulations could increase the extent of reclamation and remediation work required.
Stock-based Compensation
We account for stock-based employee compensation under the fair value recognition and measurement provisions in accordance with applicable accounting standards, which require all stock-based payments to employees, including stock grants, and grants of stock options, to be measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the resulting expense generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the period during which the employee is required to perform service in exchange for the award.
Stock-based compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period of the award on a straight-line basis. We recognize forfeitures as they occur.
Income Taxes
The calculation of income tax expense, deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities involve significant management estimation and judgment involving a number of assumptions. In determining these amounts, management
40
interprets tax legislation and makes estimates of the expected timing of the reversal of future tax assets and liabilities. We also make assumptions about future earnings, tax planning strategies and the extent to which potential future tax benefits will be used. We are also subject to assessments by various taxation authorities which may interpret tax legislation differently, which could affect the final amount or the timing of tax payments.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
41
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to the Financial Statements
42
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Fortitude Gold Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Fortitude Gold Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Haynie and Company
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 1, 2022
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Fortitude Gold Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Fortitude Gold Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 2 Related Party Transactions to the financial statements, the Company has had expense allocations and capital contributions from Gold Resource Corporation. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2017 to 2021.
Denver, Colorado
March 24, 2021
44
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
| ||||||
ASSETS |
|
| ||||
Current assets: |
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 40,017 | $ | 27,774 | ||
Accounts receivable |
| 238 |
| 145 | ||
Inventories |
| 37,550 |
| 23,051 | ||
Prepaid taxes | 1,289 | — | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
| 2,228 |
| 1,962 | ||
Total current assets |
| 81,322 |
| 52,932 | ||
Property, plant and mine development, net |
| 37,226 |
| 50,990 | ||
Operating lease assets, net |
| 463 |
| 6,198 | ||
Deferred tax assets | 509 | 959 | ||||
Other non-current assets |
| 2,909 |
| 1,946 | ||
Total assets | $ | 122,429 | $ | 113,025 | ||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,127 | $ | 1,715 | ||
Loans payable, current |
| 87 |
| 665 | ||
Finance lease liabilities, current |
| 23 |
| 398 | ||
Operating lease liabilities, current |
| 463 |
| 6,198 | ||
Mining taxes payable |
| 1,699 |
| 1,001 | ||
Other current liabilities |
| 912 |
| 1,092 | ||
Total current liabilities |
| 5,311 |
| 11,069 | ||
Asset retirement obligations |
| 4,725 |
| 3,844 | ||
Loans payable, long-term |
| 30 |
| 117 | ||
Finance lease liabilities, long-term |
| 15 |
| 27 | ||
Total liabilities |
| 10,081 |
| 15,057 | ||
Shareholders' equity: |
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock - $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized and nil outstanding at December 31, 2021 and nil shares authorized and outstanding at December 31, 2020 |
|
| ||||
Common stock - $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized and 23,961,208 shares outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 21,211,208 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020 |
| 240 |
| 212 | ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 103,476 |
| 99,682 | ||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
| 8,632 |
| (1,926) | ||
Total shareholders' equity |
| 112,348 |
| 97,968 | ||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 122,429 | $ | 113,025 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
45
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Year ended | |||||||
December 31, | |||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||||
Sales, net | $ | 82,109 | $ | 53,967 | |||
Mine cost of sales: |
|
|
|
| |||
Production costs |
| 26,661 |
| 27,495 | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 14,728 |
| 10,241 | |||
Reclamation and remediation |
| 156 |
| 48 | |||
Total mine cost of sales |
| 41,545 |
| 37,784 | |||
Mine gross profit |
| 40,564 |
| 16,183 | |||
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
| |||
General and administrative expenses |
| 11,443 |
| 2,882 | |||
Exploration expenses |
| 5,396 |
| 2,648 | |||
Other expense, net |
| 190 |
| 233 | |||
Total costs and expenses |
| 17,029 |
| 5,763 | |||
Income before income and mining taxes |
| 23,535 |
| 10,420 | |||
Mining and income tax expense |
| 5,669 |
| 203 | |||
Net income | $ | 17,866 | $ | 10,217 | |||
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
| |||
Basic | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.48 | |||
Diluted | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.48 | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
| |||
Basic | 23,875,631 | 21,211,208 | |||||
Diluted |
| 24,108,365 |
| 21,211,208 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
| Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 | |||||||||||||
Par | Retained | |||||||||||||
Number of | Value of | Earnings | Total | |||||||||||
Common | Common | Additional Paid- | (Accumulated | Shareholders' | ||||||||||
| Shares |
| Shares |
| in Capital |
| Deficit) |
| Equity | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2019 (GRCN) | 10,000 | $ | — | $ | 78,083 | $ | (12,143) | $ | 65,940 | |||||
Capital contributions by Parent | — | — | 21,811 | — | 21,811 | |||||||||
Issuance of shares under private placement | 21,211,208 |
| 212 |
| (212) |
| — |
| — | |||||
Net income | — | — | — | 10,217 | 10,217 | |||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2020 (Fortitude) | 21,221,208 | $ | 212 | $ | 99,682 | $ | (1,926) | $ | 97,968 | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2020 (Fortitude) | 21,211,208 | $ | 212 | $ | 99,682 | $ | (1,926) | $ | 97,968 | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 2,250,000 |
| 23 |
| 3,382 |
| — |
| 3,405 | |||||
Issuance of shares under private placement | 500,000 |
| 5 |
| 495 |
| — |
| 500 | |||||
Dividends | — |
| — |
| — |
| (7,308) |
| (7,308) | |||||
True up from spin-off | — | — | (83) | — | (83) | |||||||||
Net income | — |
| — |
| — |
| 17,866 |
| 17,866 | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2021 (Fortitude) | 23,961,208 | $ | 240 | $ | 103,476 | $ | 8,632 | $ | 112,348 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
Year ended | ||||||
December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Net income | $ | 17,866 | $ | 10,217 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 14,859 |
| 10,377 | ||
Stock-based compensation | 3,405 | — | ||||
Deferred taxes | 450 | (959) | ||||
Reclamation and remediation accretion | 156 | 48 | ||||
Other operating adjustments |
| (303) |
| — | ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
| (93) |
| (145) | ||
Inventories |
| (10,866) |
| (2,300) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
| (266) |
| (1,643) | ||
Other non-current assets |
| 19 |
| (2,085) | ||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
| 29 |
| (1,508) | ||
Income and mining taxes payable |
| (591) |
| 1,001 | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| 24,665 |
| 13,003 | ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
| (4,546) |
| (6,488) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (4,546) |
| (6,488) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Contributions from GRC |
| — |
| 21,711 | ||
Dividends paid | (7,308) | — | ||||
Issuance of common stock | 500 | — | ||||
Repayment of loans payable |
| (665) |
| (879) | ||
Repayment of capital leases |
| (403) |
| (439) | ||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| (7,876) |
| 20,393 | ||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| 12,243 |
| 26,908 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| 27,774 |
| 866 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 40,017 | $ | 27,774 | ||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense paid | $ | 26 | $ | 86 | ||
Income and mining taxes paid | $ | 5,893 | $ | — | ||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Change in capital expenditures in accounts payable | $ | 503 | $ | (1,544) | ||
Change in estimate for asset retirement costs | $ | 794 | $ | 1,159 | ||
Stock contributed from Parent | $ | — | $ | 100 | ||
Equipment purchased under finance lease | $ | 16 | $ | — | ||
Right-of-Use assets acquired through operating lease | $ | 1,820 | $ | 7,265 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
48
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Fortitude Gold Corporation (the “Company,” “FGC,” or “Fortitude”) was organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on August 11, 2020. On August 18, 2020, Gold Resource Corporation (“GRC” or “Parent”) transferred all of the 10,000 issued and outstanding common stock shares of its wholly-owned subsidiary GRC Nevada Inc. (“GRCN”) to Fortitude in exchange for 21,211,208 shares of Fortitude’s common stock. With the share transfer, GRCN became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortitude and Fortitude became a wholly-owned subsidiary of GRC. The assets and liabilities were recorded at historical cost as the entities were under common control.
On December 31, 2020, GRC completed the spin-off of FGC, which separated FGC’s business, activities, and operations into a separate, public company. The Spin-Off was effected by the distribution of all of the outstanding shares of FGC common stock to GRC’s shareholders. GRC’s shareholders received one share of FGC common stock for every 3.5 shares of GRC’s common stock held as of December 28, 2020.
In February 2021, FGC began trading on the OTC Market under the ticker symbol “FRTT”. Subsequently the symbol was changed to “FTCO” and was up listed to the OTCQB in March 2021.
FGC is a mining company which pursues gold and silver projects that are expected to have both low operating costs and high returns on capital.
Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements included herein are expressed in United States dollars and conform to United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its subsidiaries GRCN, Walker Lane Minerals Corp. (“WLMC”), County Line Holdings, Inc., and County Line Minerals Corp. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 and statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 have been have been prepared on a “carve-out” basis to include allocations of certain expenses for human resources, accounting, and other services, plus share-based compensation allocated from GRC. The expense allocations have been determined on basis that the Company and GRC consider to be reasonable reflections of the utilization of services, or the benefits provided. In addition, the assets and liabilities include only those assigned to the carve-out entities. The allocations and related estimates and assumptions are described more fully in Note 2, Related Party Transactions. Further, the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 do not necessarily reflect what the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows would have been had the Company been a separate entity nor are they indicative of the future results of the Company. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020, reflects the consolidated balance sheet of FGC and its subsidiaries, while the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 have been derived from the accounting records of GRC and should be read with the accompanying notes thereto.
Risk and Uncertainties
As a mining company, the Company’s revenue, profitability and future rate of growth are substantially dependent on prevailing metal prices for gold and to a lesser extent silver. Historically, the commodity markets have been very volatile, and there can be no assurance that commodity prices will not be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. A substantial or extended decline in commodity prices could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial
49
position, results of operations, cash flows, access to capital and on the quantities of reserves that the Company can economically produce. The carrying value of the Company’s property, plant and mine development, net; inventories; stockpiles and ore on leach pads; and deferred income tax assets are particularly sensitive to the outlook for the market price for gold. A decline in the price of gold and silver from current levels could result in material impairment charges related to these assets.
In addition to changes in gold prices, other factors such as changes in mine plans, increases in costs, geotechnical failures, changes in social, environmental or regulatory requirements, impacts of global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and management’s decision to reprioritize or abandon a development project can adversely affect the Company’s ability to recover its investment in certain assets and result in impairment charges.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a material impact on the global economy, the scale and duration of which remain uncertain. The Company remained fully operational during 2021, however, the future impact of this pandemic could include temporary or sustained site closures, significant COVID-19 specific costs, volatility in the prices for gold and other metals, logistical challenges shipping the Company’s products, additional travel restrictions, other supply chain disruptions and workforce interruptions, including loss of life. Depending on the duration and extent of the impact of COVID-19 and the success of a widely available vaccine, this could materially impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and could result in material impairment charges to the Company’s property, plant and mine development, net; inventories; stockpiles and ore on leach pads; and deferred income tax assets. As the situation continues to evolve, the Company will continue to closely monitor market conditions and respond accordingly. The Company has completed various scenario planning analyses to consider potential impacts of COVID 19 on its business, including volatility in commodity prices, temporary disruptions and/or curtailments of operating activities (voluntary or involuntary). The Company believes that its operations will be sufficient for the foreseeable future, although there is no assurance that will be the case.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of-production depreciation calculations; future metal prices; environmental remediation, reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable gold and other minerals in stockpile and leach pad inventories; estimates of fair value related to asset impairment assessments; write-downs of inventory, stockpiles and ore on leach pads to net realizable value; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets; provisional amounts related to income tax effects of newly enacted tax laws. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain and bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all cash balances and highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased and are carried at cost.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable consists of trade receivables, which are recorded from the sale of doré.
50
Inventories
The major inventory categories are set forth below:
Stockpile Inventories: Stockpile inventories represent ore that has been mined and is available for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, an estimate of the contained metals (based on assay data) and the estimated metallurgical recovery rates. Costs are allocated to stockpiles based on relative values of material stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred, including applicable overhead, depreciation and amortization relating to mining operations. Material is removed at each stockpile’s average cost per ounce. Stockpiles are carried at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on current and long-term metals prices, less the estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. The current portion of stockpiles is determined based on the expected amounts to be processed within the next 12 months. Stockpiles not expected to be processed within the next 12 months are classified as long-term. See Note 4 for current and long-term balances as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Doré Inventory: Doré inventories includes gold and silver doré bars held at the Company’s facility. Doré inventories are carried at the lower of cost of production or net realizable value based on current metals prices.
Leach Pad: Ore on leach pad represents ore that has been mined and placed on the leach pad where a solution is applied to the surface of the heap to extract the gold or silver. Costs are added to ore on leach pads based on current mining costs, including applicable depreciation and amortization relating to mining operations. Costs are removed from ore on leach pads as ounces are recovered based on the average cost per estimated recoverable ounce of gold or silver on the leach pad.
Estimates of recoverable ore on the leach pad are calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the leach pad (measured tonnes added to the leach pad), the grade of ore placed on the leach pad (based on assay data) and a recovery percentage (based on ore type).
Although the quantities of recoverable ore placed on the leach pad are reconciled by comparing the grades of ore placed on pads to the quantities of metal actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. Changes in assumptions and estimates are accounted for on a prospective basis.
Materials and Supplies Inventories: Materials and supplies inventories consist of chemical reagents, fuels, and other materials and supplies. Cost includes applicable taxes and freight. Materials and supplies inventory is carried at lower of average cost or net realizable value.
Write-downs of inventory are charged to expense.
Property, Plant and Mine Development
Land and Mineral Rights: The costs of acquiring land and mineral rights are considered tangible assets. Administrative and holding costs to maintain an exploration property are expensed as incurred. If a mineable mineral deposit is discovered, such capitalized costs are amortized when production begins using the units of production (“UOP”) method. If no mineable mineral deposit is discovered or such rights are otherwise determined to have diminished value, such costs are expensed in the period in which the determination is made.
Mine Development: The costs include engineering and metallurgical studies, drilling and other related costs to delineate an ore body, the building of access ways, shafts, lateral access, drifts, ramps and other infrastructure. Costs incurred before mineralization is classified as proven and probable reserves are expensed and classified as exploration expenses. Capitalization of mine development project costs, that meet the definition of an asset, begins once mineralization is classified as proven and probable reserves.
51
Drilling costs incurred during the production phase for operational ore control are allocated to inventory costs and then included as a component of production costs. All other drilling and related costs are expensed as incurred.
Mine development costs are amortized using the UOP method based on estimated recoverable ounces in proven and probable reserves.
The cost of removing overburden and waste materials to access the ore body at an open pit mine prior to the production phase are referred to as “pre-stripping costs”. Pre-stripping costs are capitalized during the development of an open pit mine. Where multiple open pits exist at a mining complex utilizing common processing facilities, pre-stripping costs are capitalized at each pit. The removal, production, and sale of deminimis saleable materials may occur during the development phase of an open pit mine and are assigned incremental mining costs related to the removal of that material.
The production phase of an open pit mine commences when saleable minerals, beyond a de minimis amount, are produced. Stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are variable production costs that are included as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory.
Property and Equipment: All items of property and equipment are carried at cost. Normal maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred while expenditures for major maintenance and improvements are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposition are recognized in other (income) expense.
Construction in Progress: Expenditures for new facilities or equipment are capitalized and recorded at cost. Once completed and ready for its intended use, the asset is transferred to property and equipment to be depreciated or amortized.
Depreciation and Amortization: Capitalized costs are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line or UOP method at rates sufficient to depreciate such costs over the shorter of estimated productive lives of such assets or the useful life of the individual assets. The estimates for mineral reserves are a key component in determining the UOP depreciation rates. The estimates of reserves may change, possibly in the near term, resulting in changes to depreciation and amortization rates in future reporting periods. The following are the estimated economic lives of depreciable assets:
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If an impairment is indicated, a determination is made whether an impairment has occurred and any impairment losses are measured as the excess of carrying value over the total discounted estimated future cash flows, or the application of an expected fair value technique in the absence of an observable market price and are charged to expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups.
Existing reserves and other mineralized material are included when estimating the fair value in determining whether the assets are impaired. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows are based on numerous assumptions including expected gold and other commodity prices, production levels, capital requirements and estimated salvage values. It is possible that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as actual future quantities of
52
recoverable minerals, gold and other commodity prices, production levels and costs and capital requirements are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The recorded amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and loans payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Revenue Recognition
Gold doré sales are recognized upon the satisfaction of performance obligations, which occurs when price and quantity are agreed upon with the customer. Silver doré sales are immaterial. Doré sales are recorded using quoted metal prices, net of refining charges.
Production Costs
Production costs include labor and benefits, royalties, and doré shipping costs, mining subcontractors, fuel and lubricants, legal and professional fees related to mine operations, materials and supplies, repairs and maintenance, explosives, insurance, reagents, travel, medical services, security equipment, office rent, tools, and other costs that support mining operations.
Exploration Costs
Exploration costs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs to identify new mineral resources and to evaluate potential resources are considered exploration costs.
Asset Retirement Obligation
An asset retirement obligation is recognized when incurred and is recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, the asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the asset’s carrying value and amortized over the life of the related asset. Asset retirement costs are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimated present value resulting from the passage of time and revisions to the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation costs. The estimated asset retirement obligation is based on when spending for an existing disturbance is expected to occur. The Company reviews, on an annual basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the reclamation obligation in accordance with ASC guidance for asset retirement obligations.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes and the effect of net operating losses using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that they will be realized. Please see Note 5 for additional information.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income per share reflects the dilution that could occur if potentially dilutive securities, as determined using the treasury stock method, are converted into common stock. Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the calculation when their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, such as periods when a net loss is reported or when the exercise price of the instrument exceeds the average fair market value of the underlying common stock.
53
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation awards exchanged for employee services at fair value on the date of the grant and expenses the awards in the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite employee service period on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur. The Company's estimates may be impacted by certain variables including, but not limited to, stock price volatility, and related tax impacts.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company has considered and assessed the credit risk resulting from its doré sales arrangements with its customers. In the event that the Company’s relationships with its customers are interrupted for any reason, the Company believes that it would be able to locate another entity to purchase its doré bars; however, any interruption could temporarily disrupt the Company’s sale of its products and adversely affect operating results.
The Isabella Pearl Mine in Nevada, U.S.A. accounted for 100% of the Company’s 2021 and 2020 net sales with one customer accounting for 96% of net sales in both 2021 and 2020.
2. Related Party Transactions
Effective December 31, 2020, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Company entered into a Management Services Agreement (“MSA” or “Agreement”) with GRC that governed the relationship of the parties following the Spin-Off. The MSA provided that the Company received services from GRC and its subsidiaries to assist in the transition of the Company as a separate company including, managerial and technical supervision, advisory and consultation with respect to mining operations, exploration, environmental, safety and sustainability matters. The Company also received certain administrative services related to information technology, accounting and financial advisory services, legal and compliance support and investor relation and shareholder communication services. The agreed upon charges for services rendered were based on market rates that align with the rates that an unaffiliated service provider would charge for similar services. The MSA’s initial term was to expire on December 31, 2021, would automatically renew annually and may be cancelled upon 30 days written notice by one party to the other during the term. On April 21, 2021, GRC provided the Company 30 days written notice to cancel the MSA effective May 21, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $0.4 million of expense related to the MSA.
Prior to the Spin-Off, GRC provided human resources, information technology, accounting, legal, technical, and other services to the Company. The Company obtained its business insurance under GRC. The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, Shareholder’s Equity and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, include allocations of all of these expenses. The allocation method calculates the appropriate share of overhead cost to the Company by using time spent by GRC employees. The Company believes the allocation methodology used is reasonable, has been consistently applied, and results in an appropriate allocation of costs incurred. However, these allocations may not be indicative of the cost had the Company been a stand-alone entity or of future services. GRC allocated $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. These costs were treated as capital contributions from GRC in the accompanying 2020 financial statements. In addition, the Company received cash contributions from GRC to help fund its operations and mine development, which are not expected to be repaid and are treated as capital contributions. For year ended December 31, 2020, the Company received total capital contributions from GRC of $21.8 million inclusive of allocated costs described above.
54
3. Revenue
The following table presents the Company’s net sales disaggregated by source:
| Year ended | |||||
December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Sales, net |
|
| ||||
Gold doré sales | $ | 82,390 | $ | 54,264 | ||
Less: Refining charges |
| (281) |
| (297) | ||
Total sales, net | $ | 82,109 | $ | 53,967 |
4. Inventories
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, current inventories consisted of the following:
In addition to the inventory above, as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company has $2.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of low-grade ore stockpile inventory included in other non-current assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company recorded $3.6 million in net realizable value (“NRV”) inventory adjustments. No NRV adjustments were recorded in 2021.
5. Income Taxes
The Company files a consolidated U.S. income tax return. The Company also files a Nevada net proceeds of minerals tax return and such tax is treated as an income tax for purposes of ASC 740. At the federal level, the Company’s income (loss) in the U.S. is taxed at 21%, while a 5% net proceeds of minerals tax applies in Nevada. For financial reporting purposes, the Company recorded net income before income taxes of $23.5 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
55
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had $5.2 million and $1.2 million of current tax expense, respectively. As a result of the spinoff from GRC, $(0.1) million and $0.2 million in federal current tax (benefit)/expense resulted in an adjustment to additional paid in capital and did not generate a tax payable in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable United States statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax income from operations as a result of the following differences:
56
The following table sets forth deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Other Tax Disclosures
The Company evaluates the evidence available to determine whether a valuation allowance is required on the deferred tax assets. The Company removed the valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets in 2020 as a result of significant taxable income in the year and the strong likelihood of utilization of its net deferred tax assets as a result of continuing operations. The Company continues to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets.
As of both December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company believes that it has no uncertain tax positions. If the Company were to determine there was an uncertain tax position, the Company would recognize the liability and related interest and penalties within income tax expense.
6. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
| December 31, |
| December 31, | |||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
| (in thousands) | |||||
Contractor advances | $ | 1,831 | $ | 1,670 | ||
Prepaid insurance | 250 | 195 | ||||
Other current assets |
| 147 |
| 97 | ||
Total | $ | 2,228 | $ | 1,962 |
57
7. Property, Plant and Mine Development, net
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, property, plant and mine development consisted of the following:
(1) | Includes $0.1 million and $1.8 million of assets recorded under finance leases at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Please see Note 12 for additional information. |
(2) | Includes capital expenditures in accounts payable of $1.1 million and $0.6 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. |
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded depreciation and amortization expense of $14.9 million and $10.4 million, respectively.
8. Other Current Liabilities
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, other current liabilities consisted of the following:
| December 31, |
| December 31, | |||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
| (in thousands) | |||||
Accrued royalty payments | $ | 435 | $ | 718 | ||
Accrued property and excise taxes |
| 461 |
| 353 | ||
Other accrued expenses | 16 | 21 | ||||
Total | $ | 912 | $ | 1,092 |
58
9. Asset Retirement Obligation
The following table presents the changes in the Company’s asset retirement obligation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
As of December 31, 2021 the Company had a $7.5 million off-balance sheet arrangement consisting of a $12.2 million surety bond off-set by a $4.7 million asset retirement for future reclamation obligations for Isabella Pearl. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a $5.4 million off-balance sheet arrangement consisting of a $9.2 million surety bond off-set by a $3.8 million asset retirement obligation for future reclamation obligations for Isabella Pearl. The Company’s asset retirement obligations were discounted using a credit adjusted risk-free rate of 8%.
10. Loans Payable
The Company has financed certain equipment purchases on a long-term basis. The loans bear annual interest at rates ranging from 3% to 4.48%, are collateralized by the equipment, and require monthly principal and interest payments of $0.01 million. As of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, there was an outstanding balance of $0.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Scheduled remaining minimum repayments are $0.1 million in 2022. The fair value of the loans payable, based on Level 2 inputs, approximated the outstanding balance at both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. See Note 15 for the definition of a Level 2 input.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has a Contract Mining Agreement with a mining contractor relating to mining activities at its Isabella Pearl Mine. Included in this Agreement is an embedded lease for the mining equipment for which the Company has recognized a right-of-use asset and corresponding operating lease liability. Please see Note 12 for more information. In addition to the embedded lease payments, the Company pays the contract miner operational costs in the normal course of business. These costs represent the remaining future contractual payments for the Contract Mining Agreement over its term. The contractual payments are determined by rates within the Contract Mining Agreement, estimated tonnes moved and bank cubic yards for drilling and blasting. As of December 31, 2021, total estimated contractual payments remaining, excluding embedded lease payments, are $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
12. Leases
Operating Leases
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; the Company recognizes lease expense for these leases as incurred over the lease term. For leases beginning in 2019 and later, the Company accounts for lease components (e.g., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) separately from the non-lease components (e.g., common-area maintenance costs).
The depreciable life of assets are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s operating leases as of December 31, 2021 is 0.08 years.
59
The discount rate implicit within the Company’s leases is generally not determinable and therefore the Company determines the discount rate based on its incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate for the Company’s leases is determined based on the lease term adjusted for impacts of collateral. The weighted average discount rate used to measure the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 was 4.48%.
There are no material residual value guarantees and no restrictions or covenants imposed by the Company’s leases.
The Company has an embedded lease for its mining equipment in its Contract Mining Agreement for its Isabella Pearl Mine, which was renewed for a three-month period in October 2021 resulting in the recognition of a $1.8 million right-of-use asset and corresponding $1.8 operating lease liability. The Company’s lease payments for its mining equipment are determined by tonnage hauled. The payments, amortization of the right-of-use asset, and interest vary immaterially from forecasted amounts due to variable conditions at the mine. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company capitalized variable lease costs of $8.2 million to Inventory and nil to Property, plant, and mine development. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company capitalized variable lease costs of $6.4 million to Inventory and $1.5 million to Property, plant, and mine development.
Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands)
Year Ending December 31: |
|
| |
2022 | $ | 466 | |
Thereafter |
| — | |
Total lease payments |
| 466 | |
Less imputed interest |
| (3) | |
Present value of minimum payments |
| 463 | |
Less: current portion |
| (463) | |
Long-term portion of minimum payments | $ | — |
Finance Leases
The Company has finance lease agreements for certain equipment. The leases bear annual imputed interest of 4.48% and require monthly principal, interest, and sales tax payments of $0.04 million. The weighted average discount rate for the Company’s finance leases is 4.48%. Scheduled minimum annual payments as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31: |
|
| |
2022 | $ | 23 | |
2023 |
| 13 | |
2024 |
| 4 | |
2025 |
| — | |
Thereafter |
| — | |
Total minimum obligations |
| 40 | |
Less: interest portion |
| (2) | |
Present value of minimum payments |
| 38 | |
Less: current portion |
| (23) | |
Long-term portion of minimum payments | $ | 15 |
The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s finance leases as of December 31, 2021 is 1.88 years.
60
Supplemental cash flow information related to the Company’s operating and finance leases is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
13. Other Expense, Net
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, other expense, net consisted of the following:
Year ended | |||||||
December 31, | |||||||
2021 |
| 2020 | |||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Interest expense | $ | 129 | $ | 143 | |||
Charitable contributions | 71 | 100 | |||||
Other income | (10) | (10) | |||||
Total | $ | 190 | $ | 233 |
14. Net Income per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated based on the assumption that stock options and other dilutive securities outstanding, which have an exercise price less than the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the period, would have been exercised on the later of the beginning of the period or the date granted and that the funds obtained from the exercise were used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.
The effect of the Company’s dilutive securities is calculated using the treasury stock method and only those instruments that result in a reduction in net income per common share are included in the calculation. As of December 31, 2021, potentially dilutive securities representing 90,000 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.
Basic and diluted net income per common share is calculated as follows:
61
15. Fair Value Measurement
Fair value accounting establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
Level 2 | Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and |
Level 3 | Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). |
As required by accounting guidance, assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables set forth certain of the Company’s assets measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020:
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| Input Hierarchy Level | |||
| (in thousands) |
| ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 40,017 | $ | 27,774 | Level 1 | |||
Accounts receivable |
| 238 |
| 145 | Level 2 | |||
Loans payable | $ | 117 | $ | 782 | Level 2 |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash deposits and are valued at cost, which approximates fair value.
Accounts receivable include amounts due to the Company for deliveries of doré sold to customers, which approximates fair value.
Loans payable consist of obligations for equipment purchases financed on a long-term basis. Loans payable are recorded at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. See Note 10 for additional information.
16. Stock-Based Compensation
The Fortitude Gold Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) allows for the issuance of up to 5 million shares of common stock in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, stock grants, and stock units. The Company utilizes this Incentive Plan to attract, retain and incentivize staff.
Stock Grants
During the year ended December 31, 2021, in conjunction with its staffing process post Spin-Off, the Company issued 2,250,000 shares of its common stock to officers, directors, management and other key personnel. These shares immediately vested and had a weighted average fair value $1.45 per share. No shares were issued during year ended December 31, 2020.
62
Stock Options
A summary of stock option activity under the Incentive Plan for the year ended December 31, 2021 is presented below:
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Weighted Average |
| Aggregate |
| |||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020 | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||
Granted | 462,000 | 2.12 | - | - | |||||||
Forfeited | (40,000) | 1.00 | - | - | |||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 | 422,000 | $ | 2.23 | 4.11 | $ | 1,852 |
No options were vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2021.
The weighted-average fair value of options per share granted during the year ended December 31, 2021 was $1.24. No stock options were issued during the year ended December 31, 2020.
No stock options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The Company utilizes the simplified method to determine expected life because of a lack of sufficient exercise history. The weighted average assumptions used to determine the value of stock-based awards under the Black-Scholes method are summarized below:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.35 | % | - | % | ||
Dividend yield | 0.68 | % | - | % | ||
Expected volatility | 73.88 | % | - | % | ||
Expected life in years | 3.5 | - |
As of December 31, 2021, there was $0.4 million of total unrecognized expense related to stock options, which is being amortized through 2024.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2021:
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded $3.4 million of stock-based compensation. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized $0.7 million of stock-based compensation expenses allocated from GRC, as described in Note 2, for options and restricted stock units granted under GRC’s equity incentive plan.
63
17. Shareholder’s Equity
On January 11, 2021, the Company completed a private placement sale of 500,000 shares of its common stock at $1.00 per share to 20 individual investors. The shares have a restrictive legend with no registration rights. No commission or finder’s fee was paid in connection with the private placement.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company declared and paid dividends of $7.3 million or $0.30 per share.
See Note 16 for information concerning shares and options granted pursuant to the Company's Equity Incentive Plan.
64
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
On March 25, 2021, our Board of Directors dismissed Plante & Moran PLLC (“Plante Moran”) and engaged Haynie and Company (“Haynie”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. The audit reports of Plante Moran on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years December 31, 2020 and 2019, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and in the interim period up to March 25, 2021, there were no (1) disagreements between us and Plante Moran on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years, or (2) “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and in the interim period up to March 25, 2021, we have not consulted with Haynie regarding either (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided by Haynie to us that was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (2) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including our subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designated by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on our assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer both believe that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was not required to and did not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
65
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Fourth Quarter 2021 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
66
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
The name, age and position of our directors, executive officers and key employees as of March 1, 2022 are as follows:
Name | Age |
| Position | |
Jason Reid | 48 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Bill M. Conrad | 65 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||
John Labate | 73 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
Barry Devlin | 64 | Vice President of Exploration | ||
Gregory Patterson | 52 | Vice President of Corporate Development |
Jason D. Reid serves as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Fortitude Gold Corporation since the spin-off from Gold Resource Corporation (“GRC”) where Jason previously served for over 14 years including CEO, President and Director positions. Jason joined GRC in 2006 when it was a private Company and helped take it public with a self-underwritten IPO. Jason was part of a management team that took GRC from an exploration stage company, to a development stage company, to a gold and silver dividend paying producer. Under his tenure as CEO & President, GRC achieved over a decade of production, ten consecutive years of profitability, generated over $1 billion in revenue and returned over $116 million in dividends to shareholders. At GRC, he also co-created and initiated the first known cash to physical gold and silver dividend program whereby shareholders could take delivery of precious metals. As an entrepreneur prior to GRC, Jason was the founder and president of two successful businesses he ran for 13 years. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Fort Lewis College. Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Reid’s experience founding and operating his own business, as well as over fifteen years of mining industry experience, significant participation in the development of business strategy and decision-making for the Company provides him with the appropriate experience and qualifications to serve as a member of our Board.
Bill M. Conrad serves as Chairman of Fortitude Gold Corporation. He previously served on the Board of Directors of Gold Resource Corporation (NYSE American: GORO) for 15 years, where he held several positions including Lead Independent Director, Audit Committee Chairman, Compensation Committee Chairman, Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman as well as the Chairman of the Board of Directors from 2014 to 2021. Over the past 35 years, Mr. Conrad has served as an executive officer and director of numerous private and publicly traded companies. In 1990, Mr. Conrad cofounded MCM Capital Management, Inc., a private management consulting firm which assisted private and public companies with management, financial needs, mergers, acquisitions, public and private markets, and funding and finance sources. Mr. Conrad also served as a Director of Synergy Resources Corp. (NYSE American: SYRG & SRCI) from 2008 until 2017, an oil and gas company operating in the DJ Basin of Colorado. Mr. Conrad was a member of the Audit Committee, member of the Nominating Committee and Chairman of the compensation committee during his tenure at SYRG. Mr. Conrad's expertise is primarily focused in the areas of financial management, accounting principles, financial statements and corporate development. Our Board believes that the management and corporate finance experience developed by Mr. Conrad over 35 years serving as an executive officer and director of numerous private and publicly-traded companies, his extractive industry experience, as well as his familiarity with relevant accounting principles and financial statement presentation, qualifies Mr. Conrad to serve as a director.
John A. Labate was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2021. Mr. Labate is an experienced mining industry executive with over thirty-five years of financial management and accounting experience. His extensive experience includes previously serving as CFO for Gold Resource Corporation, Golden Star Resources Ltd., Constellation Copper Corporation and Crown Resources Corporation.
67
Barry D. Devlin joined the Company as our Vice President of Exploration on March 1, 2021. Mr. Devlin is an experienced mining industry executive with over thirty-nine years of exploration experience. He previously held positions at companies including Gold Resource Corporation, Endeavour Silver Corporation and Hecla Mining Company. He has participated in the discovery, acquisition and development of numerous mineral deposits including extensive experience in epithermal gold-silver (high and low sulfidation) systems and porphyry copper gold skarns. He has worked in a variety of geologic environments in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Guyana, Peru and Venezuela and has established a solid track record in generative exploration programs. He holds a BS degree with honors in Geology, 1981, and a Masters in Geology, 1987, from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Gregory A. Patterson was appointed as our Vice President of Corporate Development on March 1, 2021. Mr. Patterson was the Vice President of Corporate Development for Gold Resource Corporation ("GORO") between October 2013 and February 2021. In this capacity, he managed investor relations for GORO and participated in overall corporate strategy. Prior to joining GORO, Mr. Patterson spent fifteen years in marketing and territory sales management for two manufacturers of precision laboratory instruments. Mr. Patterson holds a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Biology (1991) from the University of Colorado and is the brother-in-law of Jason Reid, a Director of the Company and the Company's Chief Executive Officer.
Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight
The Board does not have a formal policy regarding the separation of the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board, as the Board believes it is in the best interest of our Company to make that determination periodically based on the position and direction of our Company and the membership of the Board. At the present time, our CEO and Chairman roles are separated. As the director with significant experience serving on boards for over thirty years, Mr. Conrad brings extensive knowledge of the Company’s history in addition to experience with various companies in natural resource industries. In his capacity as Chairman, he works closely with Mr. Reid, the Chief Executive Officer. The Board also does not have a formal policy that designates a lead independent director at this time; however, Mr. Conrad, as Chairman of the Board leads meetings of the board.
Companies such as ours face a variety of risks, including financial reporting, legal, credit, liquidity, operational, health, safety and cybersecurity risk. The Board believes an effective risk management system will (1) identify the material risks that we face in a timely manner, (2) communicate necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant board committee, (3) implement or oversee implementation of appropriate and responsive risk management and mitigation strategies consistent with our risk profile, and (4) integrate risk management into our decision-making.
The Board oversees risk management after receiving briefings from management and advisors and also based on its own analysis and conclusions regarding the adequacy of our risk management processes. The Board, with assistance and input from its committees, continuously evaluates and manages material risks including geopolitical and enterprise risk, financial risk, environmental risk, health and safety risk, and the effect of compensation structures on risk-taking behaviors. By virtue of the directors working closely with executive management, who in turn work closely with the operators of our mine, we have created an effective and efficient risk communication system that has increased collaboration and communication.
Board Diversity and Independence
The Company does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. The Company continues to strive to nominate individuals with a variety of backgrounds, industry experience and complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board possesses the appropriate talent, skills, and expertise to oversee our businesses. This assessment includes consideration of independence, expertise, mining and other industry background, age, gender, skills, geographic location and time availability, in the context of the needs of the Board and our Company.
68
As of February 28, 2022, we had the following directors:
Name | Type | |
Bill M. Conrad | Independent | |
Jason Reid | Non-Independent |
The following table summarizes the total compensation for all independent directors serving during 2021:
(1) | The value of all stock awarded during the periods covered by the table calculated in accordance with ASC 718-10-30-3 which represented the grant date fair value. |
(2) | The fair value of all stock options granted during the periods covered by the table calculated on the grant date in accordance with ASC 718-10-30-3 which represented the grant date fair value. |
Item 11. Executive Compensation
General Information
The Board of Directors takes seriously its role in the administration of the Company’s compensation programs and values input from shareholders.
Our named executive officers are compensated through the following three components:
● | Base Salary |
● | Short-Term Incentives (cash bonuses) |
● | Long-Term Incentives (equity-based awards) |
● | Benefits |
These components provide a balanced mix of base compensation and compensation that is contingent upon our executive officer’s individual performance. A goal of the compensation program is to provide executive officers with a reasonable level of security through base salary and benefits. We want to ensure that the compensation programs are appropriately designed to encourage executive officer retention and motivation to create shareholder value. We believe that our shareholders are best served when we can attract and retain talented executives by providing compensation packages that are competitive but fair. The pool of industry experienced individuals is relatively small and competition is fierce among the industry to identify, hire and retain personnel.
Base Salaries
Base salaries generally have been targeted to be competitive when compared to the salary levels of persons holding similar positions in other publicly traded mining companies of comparable size. The executive officer’s respective responsibilities, experience, expertise, and individual performance are considered.
Short-Term Incentives
Cash bonuses may be awarded at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors based upon a variety of factors that encompass both individual and company performance.
69
Long-Term Incentives
Equity incentive awards help to align the interests of our employees with those of our shareholders. Equity based awards are made under our Equity Incentive Plan. Options are granted with exercise prices equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and may be subject to a vesting schedule as determined by the Board of Directors which administers the plan.
We believe that grants of equity-based compensation:
● | enhance the link between the creation of shareholder value and long-term executive incentive compensation; |
● | provide focus, motivation, and retention incentive; and |
● | provide competitive levels of total compensation |
In addition to cash and equity compensation programs, named executive officers participate in the health and welfare benefit programs available to other employees.
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth in summary form the compensation received by our executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
Stock | Option | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal | Salary | Bonus | Awards | Awards | Compensation | |||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position |
| Year |
| (1) |
| (2) |
| (3) |
| (4) |
|
| Total | |||||||
Jason D. Reid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
CEO & President | 2021 | $ | 541,667 | $ | 1,463,587 | $ | 1,190,000 | $ | — | $ | 8,700 | $ | 3,203,954 | |||||||
2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
John A. Labate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | $ | 216,667 | $ | 387,257 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,700 | $ | 612,624 | |||||||
2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Barry D. Devlin | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vice President of Exploration | 2021 | $ | 288,750 | $ | 590,797 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,700 | $ | 888,247 | |||||||
2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Gregory A. Patterson | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vice President of Corporate Development | 2021 | $ | 195,833 | $ | 487,793 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,700 | $ | 692,326 | |||||||
2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
(1) | The dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned. |
(2) | The dollar value of bonus (cash and non-cash) earned. |
(3) | The value of all stock awarded during the periods covered by the table calculated in accordance with ASC 718-10-30-3 which represented the grant date fair value. |
(4) | The fair value of all stock options granted during the periods covered by the table calculated on the grant date in accordance with ASC 718-10-30-3 which represented the grant date fair value. |
Employment Contracts
We maintain written employment agreements with each of our named executive officers that became effective March 1, 2021. The employment agreements have a one-year term from their effective date and are automatically renewable for subsequent one-year terms on each successive anniversary of the commencement of employment unless either party gives notice to the other that they do not wish to renew the agreement, provided such notice is given not less than 60 days prior to expiration. In accordance with the terms of the employment agreements, each named executive officer receives base salary and is eligible for incentive compensation in the form of cash bonuses or equity awards. A portion of the short-term incentive compensation earned each year is determined with reference to achievement of certain performance metrics, and
70
the remainder of any incentive compensation earned shall be determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors. Base salaries may be increased from time to time in the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Pursuant to the terms of these employment agreements, our named executive officers would also be entitled to certain payments in the event their employment is terminated under for a “change in control.” In that event, the named executive officer will receive 24 months’ base salary plus the prior two years’ actual or targeted bonuses as a severance payment under the terms set forth in the agreement.
We presently know of no agreements regarding a change in control of the Company. In the event of a change in control in the future, our named executive officers are entitled to certain compensation benefits as described in “Employment Agreements” above.
2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
No plan-based awards were made to Named Executive Officer in fiscal 2021 other than a grant of 850,000 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $1,190,000 to Jason D. Reid on January 12, 2021. These shares vested immediately.
Equity Incentive Plan
Our Board of Directors has adopted the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) that reserves 5,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance to plan participants in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), and stock grants and units. Each stock option awarded allows the holder to purchase one share of our common stock.
The Plan is administered by our Board of Directors (or any committee subsequently appointed by the Board) and is vested with the authority to interpret the provisions of the Plan and supervise the administration of the Plan. In addition, the Board is empowered to select those persons who will participate in the Plan, to determine the number of shares subject to each award and to determine when, and upon what conditions, awards granted under the Plan will vest, terminate, or otherwise be subject to forfeiture and cancellation. The terms and conditions of any awards issued, including the price of the shares underlying each award are governed by the provisions of the Plan and any agreements with the Plan participants.
Incentive Stock Options
Employees are eligible to be granted incentive stock options pursuant to the Plan. Options granted pursuant to the Plan terminate at such time as may be specified when the option is granted.
The exercise price of each option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the granting of the option provided, however, if the optionee, at the time the option is granted, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, the purchase price of the option shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the stock at the time of the granting of the option.
The total fair market value of the shares of common stock (determined at the time of the grant of the option) for which any employee may be granted options which are first exercisable in any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.
At the discretion of the Board of Directors, options granted pursuant to the Plan may include installment exercise terms for any option such that the option becomes fully exercisable in a series of cumulating portions. The Board may also accelerate the date upon which any option (or any part of any option) is first exercisable. However, no option, or any portion thereof may be exercisable until one year following the date of grant. In no event shall an option granted to an employee then owning more than 10% of our common stock be exercisable by its terms after the expiration of five years from the date of grant, nor shall any other option granted pursuant to the Plans be exercisable by its terms after the expiration of ten years from the date of grant.
71
Non-Qualified Stock Options
Our employees, directors and officers, and consultants or advisors are eligible to receive non-qualified stock options pursuant to the Plan, provided however that bona fide services must be rendered by such consultants or advisors and such services must not be in connection with a capital-raising transaction or promoting our common stock.
At the discretion of our Board of Directors options granted pursuant to the Plan may include installment exercise terms for any option such that the option becomes fully exercisable in a series of cumulating portions. The Board may also accelerate the date upon which any option (or any part of any option) is first exercisable.
Stock Appreciation Rights
SARs give the participant the right to receive the appreciation in value of one share of common stock of the Company. Appreciation is calculated as the excess of (i) the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise over (ii) the base value fixed by the Board on the grant date, which may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. Payment for SARs shall be made in cash, stock, or a combination thereof. SARs are exercisable at the time and subject to the restrictions and conditions as the Board approves, provided that no SAR may be exercised more than ten (10) years following the grant date.
Restricted Stock
A restricted stock award gives the participant the right to receive a specified number of shares of common stock at a purchase price determined by the Board (including and typically zero). Restrictions limit the participant’s ability to transfer the stock and subject the stock to a substantial risk of forfeiture until specific conditions or goals are met. The restrictions will lapse in accordance with a schedule or other conditions as determined by the Board, which might include the achievement of specified performance targets and/or continued employment of the participant until a specified date. As a general rule, if a participant terminates employment when the restricted stock is subject to restrictions, the participant forfeits the unvested restricted stock.
Restricted Stock Units ("RSU")
An RSU award gives the participant the right to receive common stock, or a cash payment equal to the fair market value of common stock (determined as of a specified date), in the future, subject to restrictions and a risk of forfeiture. The restrictions typically involve the achievement of specified performance targets and/or the continued employment or service of the participant until a specified date. Participants holding restricted stock units have no rights as a shareholder with respect to the shares of stock subject to their restricted stock unit award prior to the issuance of such shares pursuant to the award.
Stock Grants
A stock grant award gives the participant the right to receive (or purchase at such price as determined by the Board) shares of stock, free of any vesting restrictions. The purchase price, if any, for a stock grant award shall be payable in cash or in any other form of consideration acceptable to the Board. A stock grant award may be granted or sold in respect of past services or other valid consideration, or in lieu of any cash compensation owed to a participant.
Stock Units
A stock unit award gives the participant the right to receive shares of stock, or a cash payment equal to the fair market value of a designated number of shares, in the future, free of any vesting restrictions. A stock unit award may be granted or sold in respect of past services or other valid consideration, or in lieu of any cash compensation owed to a participant.
72
Other Information Regarding the Plan
In the discretion of the Board, any option granted pursuant to the Plan may include installment exercise terms such that the option becomes fully exercisable in a series of cumulating portions. The Board may also accelerate the date upon which any option (or any part of any options) is first exercisable. Any shares issued pursuant to the Plan and any options granted pursuant to the Plan or will be forfeited if the "vesting" schedule established by the Board administering the Plan at the time of the grant is not met. For this purpose, vesting means the period during which the employee must remain as our employee or the period of time a non-employee must provide services to us. At the time an employee ceases working for us (or at the time a non-employee ceases to perform services for us), any shares or options not fully vested will be forfeited and cancelled. At the discretion of the Board payment for the shares of common stock underlying options may be paid through the delivery of shares of our common stock having an aggregate fair market value equal to the option price, provided such shares have been owned by the option holder for at least one year prior to such exercise. The exercise may be made through a "cashless" exercise or a combination of cash and shares of common stock at the discretion of the Board.
Awards are generally non-transferable except upon death of the recipient. Shares issued pursuant to the Plan will generally not be transferable until the person receiving the shares satisfies the vesting requirements imposed by the Board when the shares were issued.
Our Board of Directors may at any time, and from time to time, amend, terminate, or suspend the Plan in any manner it deems appropriate, provided that such amendment, termination or suspension will not adversely affect rights or obligations with respect to shares or options previously granted.
Summary
The following shows, as of February 28, 2022 concerning the stock options and stock bonuses granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan. Each option represents the right to purchase one share of our common stock.
Shares | ||||||||
Total Shares | Reserved for | Remaining | ||||||
Reserved | Outstanding | Shares | Options/Shares | |||||
Name of Plan |
| Under Plan |
| Options |
| Issued |
| Under Plan |
Equity Incentive Plan | 5,000,000 | 422,000 | 2,250,000 | 2,328,000 |
The following table shows the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive and Plan as of December 31, 2021.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
We do not have a compensation committee.
73
During the year ended December 31, 2021, no director was also an executive officer of another entity, which had one of our executive officers serving as a director of such entity or as a member of the compensation committee of such entity.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of February 28, 2022, of (i) each of our Officers and Directors; (ii) all Officers and Directors as a group; and (iii) each person known by us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. Unless indicated otherwise, each of the shareholders has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned. At February 28, 2022, there were 23,997,876 shares of our common stock outstanding. Shares of common stock issuable pursuant to stock options, warrants and restricted stock units exercisable or exchangeable within 60 days are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such options, warrants or restricted stock units for computing the percentage of the person holding such options, warrants or restricted stock units, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. There were no restricted stock units or common stock options or warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Jason D. Reid and Bill M. Conrad are the parents of the Company, as that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. See Item 12 of this report for information concerning the shares of common stock owned by these persons.
Item 14. Principal Accountant’s Fees and Services
Change in Independent Auditor
On March 25, 2021, we dismissed Plante & Moran, PLLC (“Plante Moran”) and engaged Haynie and Company (“Haynie”) after evaluating alternative engagements of independent registered public accounting firms, including retaining Plante Moran. The decision to change was not due to any disagreements with Plante Moran and was primarily driven by an effort to align audit costs with expectations for a company of our size. The audit reports of Plante Moran on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were no disagreements with Plante Moran on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which
74
disagreements if not resolved to Plante Moran’s satisfaction would have caused Plante Moran to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement, or reportable events.
During the two most recent years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the interim period up to March 25, 2021, the Company has not consulted with Haynie regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company by Haynie that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event.
Fees Paid to Independent Auditor
The following table sets forth the fees billed by our principal auditors in 2021 and 2020 for services rendered in connection with our annual audits and quarterly reviews, as well as for any other non-audit services provided by the firm:
Haynie | Plante Moran | |||||
Year Ended December 31, 2021 | Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||||
Audit Fees | $ | 100,491 | $ | 75,000 | ||
Audit Related Fees | — | — | ||||
Tax Fees | — | — | ||||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||||
Total | $ | 100,491 | $ | 75,000 |
Audit fees represent amounts billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Before Plante Moran and Haynie & Company were engaged by us to render audit or non-audit services, the engagements were approved by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is of the opinion that the Audit Fees charged by Plante Moran and Haynie & Company were compatible with maintaining the independence of the respective independent registered public accounting firm.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Exhibit Number |
| Description |
3.1 | ||
3.2 | ||
4.1.1 | ||
4.1.2 | ||
4.1.3 | ||
4.2 | ||
10.1 | ||
10.2 | ||
10.3 | Reserved | |
10.4 | ||
10.5 | ||
10.6 | ||
10.7 | ||
10.8 | ||
14 |
75
21† | ||
23.1† | Consent of Plante & Moran, PLLC, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
23.2* | Consent of Haynie and Company, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |
32* | ||
95† | ||
96.2* | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary of the Isabella Pearl Mine | |
96.3* | ||
96.4* | ||
96.5* | ||
96.6* | Amended Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property | |
96.7* | ||
96.8* | ||
96.9* | ||
101* | Inline XBRL Document Set for the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
104* | Inline XBRL for the cover page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, included in the Exhibit 101 Inline XBRL Document Set. |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with the Company's registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-249533).
(2) Incorporated by reference to same exhibit filed with the Company's 8-K report dated March 1, 2021 (File No. 333-249533).
*Filed with this Form 10-K/A.
†Previously filed with the Form 10-K on March 1, 2022.
The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32 hereto are deemed to be furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
76
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on December 15, 2022.
FORTITUDE GOLD CORPORATION | ||
/s/Jason D. Reid | ||
Jason D. Reid, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on December 15, 2022 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated:
Signature | Title | |
/s/ Jason D. Reid | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | |
Jason D. Reid | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
/s/ John A. Labate | Chief Financial Officer | |
John A. Labate | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |
/s/ Bill M. Conrad | Chairman of the Board of Directors | |
Bill M. Conrad | ||
Supplemental information to be furnished with reports filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants which have not registered securities pursuant to Section 12 of the Act
Every registrant which filed an annual report on this Form pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act shall furnish to the Commission for its information at the time of filing its report on this Form the following:
Every proxy statement, form of proxy statement or other proxy soliciting material sent to more than 10 of the registrant's security holders with respect to any annual or other meeting of security holders.
77
78
The undersigned stockholder of Fortitude Gold acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 18, 2022, 9:00 a.m. local time at Double Tree By Hilton Hotel, 1775 E Cheyenne Mountain Blvd., Colorado Springs, CO 80906. The undersigned stockholder of Fortitude Gold hereby appoints Jason Reid with the power of substitution, as Attorney and Proxy to vote all the shares of the undersigned at said annual meeting of stockholders and at all adjournments thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said Attorney and Proxy may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. The above named Attorney and Proxy is instructed to vote all of the undersigned’s shares as follows: | ||||||||
79
80
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE ‘FOR’ FOR PROPOSAL 1 AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE ‘FOR’ PROPOSAL 2. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DISCRETION IS INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF ALL NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND PROPOSAL 2. | MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE ◻ New Address (if applicable): ____________________________ IMPORTANT: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. Dated: ________________________, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Print Name of Stockholder and/or Joint Tenant) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Signature of Stockholder) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Second Signature if held jointly) |
81
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-259298) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 1, 2022, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Fortitude Gold Corporation as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and related notes, which report appears in the December 31, 2021 annual report on Form 10-K of Fortitude Gold Corporation.
/s/ Haynie & Company
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 1, 2022
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jason D. Reid, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Fortitude Gold Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors: |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: December 15, 2022 | /s/ Jason D. Reid |
| Jason D. Reid, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, John A. Labate, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Fortitude Gold Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors: |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: December 15, 2022 | /s/ John A. Labate |
| John A. Labate |
| Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
| |
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS REQUIRED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Fortitude Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
December 15, 2022 | /s/ Jason D. Reid | | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
| Jason D. Reid | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
December 15, 2022 | /s/ John A. Labate | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
| John A. Labate | | |
Exhibit 96.2
Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary
Isabella Pearl Mine
Mineral County, NV
Prepared for:
2886 Carriage Manor Pt
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
Project Number: 31403591
Effective Date: December 31, 2021
Report Date: February 25, 2022
Prepared by:
200 Union Boulevard, Suite 440
Lakewood, CO 80228
Qualified Persons:
Donald E. Hulse, P.E., SME-RM
Christopher Emanuel, SME-RM
Ian H. Crundwell, P. Geo.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | i |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table of Contents
1 | Executive Summary | 1 |
1.1 | Property Summary and Ownership | 1 |
1.1.1 | Property Description | 1 |
1.2 | Mineral Resource Statement | 1 |
1.3 | Mineral Reserve Statement | 3 |
1.4 | Geology and Mineralization | 4 |
1.4.1 | Geologic Setting, Mineralization, and Mineralization | 4 |
1.4.2 | Exploration | 5 |
1.5 | Metallurgy and Mineral Processing | 5 |
1.6 | Mine Design, Optimization and Scheduling | 6 |
1.7 | Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups | 6 |
1.8 | Capital Costs, Operating Costs and Financial Analysis | 8 |
1.8.1 | Capital and Operating Costs | 8 |
1.8.2 | Economic Analysis | 8 |
1.9 | Conclusions and Recommendations | 9 |
1.9.1 | Interpretation and Conclusions | 9 |
1.9.2 | Recommendations | 11 |
2 | Introduction | 12 |
2.1 | Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report | 12 |
2.2 | Source of Data and Information | 12 |
2.3 | Details of Inspection | 12 |
2.4 | Previous Reports on Mine | 12 |
3 | Property Description and Location | 13 |
3.1 | Location | 13 |
3.2 | Area of the Property | 15 |
3.3 | Mineral Titles, Claims, Rights, Leases and Options | 15 |
3.4 | Other Significant Factors and Risks | 17 |
3.5 | Royalties and Agreements | 17 |
4 | Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography | 18 |
4.1 | Topography, Elevation and Vegetation | 18 |
4.2 | Accessibility and Transportation to the Property | 18 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | ii |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | iii |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
8 | Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security | 52 |
8.1 | Historic Security Measures and Sample Preparation | 52 |
8.2 | WLMC (2016 to Present) | 52 |
8.2.1 | Security Measures | 52 |
8.2.2 | Sample Preparation and Analysis | 52 |
8.2.3 | Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures | 53 |
8.3 | Check Assays | 57 |
8.3.1 | Field Duplicates | 57 |
8.3.2 | 2021 Bureau Veritas vs ALS Gold Assay Comparison | 59 |
8.4 | Opinion of Adequacy | 60 |
9 | Data Verification | 61 |
9.1 | Opinion on Data Adequacy | 61 |
10 | Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing | 62 |
10.1 | Metallurgical Overview | 62 |
10.2 | Mineralogy and Metallurgical Ore Types | 62 |
10.3 | Previous Metallurgical Test Work Programs | 63 |
10.4 | WLMC Metallurgical Ore Characterization Test Work Programs | 64 |
10.4.1 | Results of WLMC Metallurgical Test Drill Hole Samples | 66 |
10.5 | Discussion of Metallurgical Test Gold Recovery Curves | 73 |
10.5.1 | Discussion of Bottle Roll Test Recovery Curves | 73 |
10.5.2 | Discussion of Column Leach Test Gold Recovery Curves | 74 |
10.6 | Process Selection and Design Parameters | 75 |
10.7 | Metallurgical Summary | 77 |
10.7.1 | Opinion on Adequacy | 78 |
11 | Mineral Resource Estimate | 78 |
11.1 | Introduction | 79 |
11.2 | Mineral Resources Definitions | 79 |
11.2.1 | Inferred Mineral Resources | 79 |
11.2.2 | Indicated Mineral Resources | 79 |
11.2.3 | Measured Mineral Resources | 80 |
11.3 | Database | 80 |
11.3.1 | Database Backup | 82 |
11.4 | Bulk Density | 82 |
11.5 | Wireframe Modeling | 83 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | iv |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
11.5.1 | Topography | 83 |
11.5.2 | Gridded Surfaces | 83 |
11.5.3 | Mineralization Envelopes | 84 |
11.6 | Compositing | 85 |
11.7 | Exploratory Data Analysis | 86 |
11.8 | Treatment of Extreme Values | 89 |
11.9 | Continuity Analysis | 91 |
11.10 | Block Model | 93 |
11.11 | Estimation and Classification | 93 |
11.12 | Mineral Resource Estimate | 95 |
11.13 | Risk Factors | 96 |
11.14 | Model to Production Reconciliation | 97 |
11.15 | Opinion on Adequacy | 98 |
12 | Mineral Reserve Estimate | 99 |
12.1 | Introduction | 99 |
12.2 | Mineral Reserve Definitions | 99 |
12.2.1 | Probable Mineral Reserve | 99 |
12.2.2 | Proven Mineral Resource | 99 |
12.3 | Previous Mineral Reserve Estimate | 99 |
12.4 | Mineral Reserve Estimation | 100 |
12.5 | Mineral Reserve Estimates | 100 |
12.6 | Conversion of Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserve | 102 |
12.6.1 | Dilution | 102 |
12.6.2 | Cut-off Grade | 102 |
12.7 | Relevant Factors | 103 |
13 | Mining Methods | 104 |
13.1 | Mining Methods Summary | 104 |
13.2 | Geotechnical Data, Testing and Analysis | 105 |
13.2.1 | Pit Slope Geotechnical Evaluation | 105 |
13.2.2 | South Highwall Geotechnical Assessment | 106 |
13.2.3 | Recommendations | 107 |
13.3 | Hydrogeology | 109 |
13.3.1 | Groundwater | 109 |
13.3.2 | Temporary and Permanent Diversion Channels | 110 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | v |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.4 | Mine and Waste Rock Storage Design, Production Rates and Mine Life | 110 |
13.4.1 | Mine Design | 110 |
13.5 | Waste Rock Storage Design | 114 |
13.6 | Haulage | 115 |
13.7 | Mine Production Schedule | 115 |
13.8 | Mining Operations | 117 |
13.8.1 | Ore Control | 118 |
13.8.2 | Shift Schedule | 118 |
13.8.3 | Manpower | 118 |
13.8.4 | Blasthole Drilling | 118 |
13.8.5 | Blasting | 118 |
13.8.6 | Loading | 119 |
13.8.7 | Hauling | 119 |
13.8.8 | Support Equipment | 119 |
13.8.9 | Ancillary Mining Operations | 120 |
14 | Processing and Recovery Methods | 121 |
14.1 | Process Description Summary | 121 |
14.2 | Plant Design and Equipment Characteristics | 123 |
14.2.1 | Primary Crushing and Fine Crushing | 123 |
14.2.2 | Heap Leach Pad and Solution Ponds | 123 |
14.2.3 | Adsorption-Desorption-Recovery (ADR) Facility | 126 |
14.2.4 | Major Process Equipment List | 128 |
14.2.5 | Assay Laboratory | 129 |
14.3 | Energy, Water, Material and Personnel Requirements | 129 |
14.3.1 | Power | 129 |
14.3.2 | Water Supply | 130 |
14.3.3 | Major Reagents | 130 |
14.3.4 | Labor Requirements | 130 |
15 | Infrastructure | 131 |
15.1 | Infrastructure Summary | 131 |
16 | Market Studies | 134 |
16.1 | Contracts and Status | 134 |
17 | Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact | 135 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | vi |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
17.1 | Environmental Liabilities and Permitting | 135 |
17.1.1 | Environmental Liabilities | 135 |
17.1.2 | Required Permits and Status | 135 |
17.1.3 | Federal Permitting | 139 |
17.1.4 | State Permitting | 139 |
17.1.5 | Local Permitting | 140 |
17.2 | Environmental Study Results | 140 |
17.3 | Environmental Issues | 141 |
17.4 | Operating and Post Closure Requirements and Plans | 141 |
17.5 | Post-Performance or Reclamation Bonds | 142 |
17.5.1 | Mine Closure Plan | 142 |
17.5.2 | Reclamation Measures During Operations and Mine Closure | 143 |
17.5.3 | Closure Monitoring | 143 |
17.5.4 | Reclamation and Closure Cost Estimate | 143 |
17.5.5 | 2021 Estimate of Current Closure Costs | 144 |
17.6 | Social and Community | 145 |
17.7 | Other Significant Factors and Risks | 145 |
17.8 | Adequacy of Plans to Address any Issues | 146 |
17.9 | Commitments to Local Procurement or Hiring | 146 |
18 | Capital and Operating Costs | 147 |
18.1 | Life-Of-Mine Capital Costs | 147 |
18.2 | Life-Of-Mine Operating Costs | 147 |
18.3 | Accuracy of Cost Estimate | 148 |
19 | Economic Analysis | 150 |
19.1 | Annual Production and Cash Flow Forecasts | 150 |
19.2 | Annual Production and Gross Sales Forecasts | 151 |
19.3 | Life-of-Mine Cash Flow Forecast | 151 |
19.4 | Nevada State Taxes | 152 |
19.5 | Sensitivity Analysis | 153 |
20 | Adjacent Properties | 154 |
20.1 | Registrant Properties | 154 |
20.1.1 | Isabella Pearl Mineralized Trend | 154 |
20.1.2 | Other Registrant Properties | 155 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
20.2 | Other Properties | 155 |
21 | Other Relevant Data and Information | 157 |
22 | Interpretation and Conclusions | 158 |
22.1 | Interpretation | 158 |
22.2 | Conclusion | 159 |
22.3 | Significant Opportunities | 160 |
23 | Recommendations | 161 |
23.1 | RC Drilling for Mineral Reserves | 161 |
24 | References | 163 |
25 | Reliance on Information Provided by Registrant | 166 |
List of Tables
Table 1 -1 : Mineral Resource Estimates (exclusive of Mineral Reserves) for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2021 | 2 |
Table 1 -2 : Mineral Reserve Estimates for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2021 | 4 |
Table 1 -3 : Drilling History at the Isabella Pearl Mine (1987 - 2021) | 5 |
Table 1 -4 : Summary of Costs for Optional Recommended Work | 11 |
Table 3 -1 : List of Mineral Claims for the Isabella Pearl Mine | 16 |
Table 5 -1 : Isabella Pearl Mine Production 2019 – 2021 | 23 |
Table 6 -1 : Approximate Extents of Gold-Silver Deposits in the Isabella Pearl Mine Area | 35 |
Table 7 -1 : Drilling History at the Isabella Pearl Mine (1987 - 2021) | 44 |
Table 7 -2 : Significant Results 2021 Drilling at Isabella Pearl Mine | 50 |
Table 8 -1 : WLMC 2020-2021 Standard Reference Materials | 54 |
Table 8 -2 : 2020 through 2021 SRM Failures | 55 |
Table 8 -3 : 2020 – 2021 Blank Material Failures | 57 |
Table 10 -1 : Summary Metallurgical Test Work Completed on Isabella Pearl Deposit | 63 |
Table 10 -2 : Summary of Isabella Pearl Mine Core Composites Assays, KCA 2017 Program | 66 |
Table 10 -3 Summary of Head Screen Analyses | 67 |
Table 10 -4 : Detailed Results of Head Screen Analysis | 67 |
Table 10 -5 : Summary of Mercury and Copper in Sample, KCA 2017 Program | 68 |
Table 10 -6 : Summary of Carbon and Sulfur Content, KCA 2017 Program | 69 |
Table 10 -7 : Summary Direct Agitated Cyanidation (Bottle Roll) Gold Test Results, KCA 2017 Program | 69 |
Table 10 -8 Summary Direct Agitated Cyanidation (Bottle Roll) Silver Test Results, KCA 2017 Program | 69 |
Table 10 -9 : Bureau Veritas vs ALS Gold Assay Comparison Plot | 71 |
Table 10 -10 Summary Column Leach Test Results, KCA 2017 Program | 72 |
Table 10 -11 Summary of All Bottle Roll Tests Completed on the Isabella Pearl Mine | 74 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | viii |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 10 -12 Summary of All Column Leach Tests Completed on the Isabella Pearl Mine | 75 |
Table 10 -13 : Summary of NaCN and Lime Consumption for the Column Leach Tests | 75 |
Table 10 -14 : Bottle Roll Gold Recovery Estimate by Size Fraction | 76 |
Table 10 -15 : Column Leach Gold Recovery Estimation by Size Fraction | 76 |
Table 10 -16 : Gold Recovery Estimate | 76 |
Table 10 -17 : NaCN and Lime Consumption | 77 |
Table 11 -1 Isabella Pearl Drill Hole Database Summary | 81 |
Table 11 -2 : Isabella Pearl Assay Database Summary | 81 |
Table 11 -3 : Isabella Pearl Assay Statistics Summary | 81 |
Table 11 -4 Constrained Composite Statistics | 86 |
Table 11 -5 Capping Thresholds | 91 |
Table 11 -6 Experimental Semi-Variograms and Modeled Rotations | 91 |
Table 11 -7 Block Model Setup | 93 |
Table 11 -8 Mineral Resource Inventory for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, December 31, 2021 | 96 |
Table 11 -9 : Estimation Risk Factors | 97 |
Table 12 -1 : Mineral Reserve Statement Isabella Pearl Mine, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2020 | 100 |
Table 12 -2 : Mineral Reserve Estimates for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2021 | 101 |
Table 12 -3 : Mineral Reserves by Deposit for the Isabella Pearl Mine as of December 31, 2021 | 101 |
Table 12 -4 : Isabella Pearl Marginal Cut-off Grade Assumptions | 102 |
Table 13 -1 Maximum Recommended Pit Slope Angles | 105 |
Table 13 -2 Location and Design of the 2021 Geotechnical Drilling Program | 107 |
Table 13 -3 Summary of FOS | 107 |
Table 13 -4 Designed Pit Parameters | 111 |
Table 13 -5 Initial Isabella Pearl Designed Pit Reserves | 113 |
Table 13 -6 Mine Production Schedule | 117 |
Table 13 -7 Approximate Production Shift Schedule | 118 |
Table 14 -1 Major Process Equipment for the Isabella Pearl Mine | 128 |
Table 14 -2 Major Reagent Consumption | 130 |
Table 14 -3 Labor Summary | 130 |
Table 15 -1 Infrastructure Items and Specifications | 132 |
Table 17 -1 : Permits, Licenses, and Issuing Authorities for the Isabella Pearl Mine | 136 |
Table 17 -2 : BLM Notice of Intent Summary for the Isabella Pearl Mine | 139 |
Table 17 -3 : Mine Closure and Reclamation Cost Summary for the Isabella Pearl Mine as of December 31, 2021 | 145 |
Table 18 -1 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Capital Cost Summary | 147 |
Table 18 -2 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Operating Cash Cost per Tonne Processed | 147 |
Table 18 -3 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Operating Cash Cost per Ounce Sold | 148 |
Table 19 -1 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Production Summary | 150 |
Table 19 -2 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Gross Sales | 151 |
Table 19 -3 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Free Cash Flow Summary | 151 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | ix |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 19-4 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Cash Flow | 152 |
Table 19-5 Isabella Pearl Mine Sensitivity to Capex & Au Price | 153 |
Table 20-1 Unpatented Mining Claims held by WLMC Adjacent to Isabella Pearl | 154 |
Table 23-1 Detailed Budget for Proposed Exploration Drilling at Isabella Pearl Mine | 162 |
List of Figures
Figure 3-1 : General Location Map of the Isabella Pearl Mine | 14 |
Figure 3-2 : Isabella Pearl Mine Area Mineral Claims Map | 15 |
Figure 4-1 : Isabella Pearl Mine Access | 19 |
Figure 6-1 : Isabella Pearl Mine Regional Geologic Map | 25 |
Figure 6-2 : Isabella Pearl Mine Stratigraphic Column | 27 |
Figure 6-3 Cross Section through the Isabella Pearl Mine; view NW. | 27 |
Figure 6-4 : Isabella Pearl Mine Geologic Map | 28 |
Figure 6-5 : High Sulfidation Characteristics of the Isabella Pearl Mineralization | 34 |
Figure 6-6 : Idealized Stratigraphic Section Highlighting Mineralization Controls for Isabella Pearl | 35 |
Figure 7-1 : Local rock chip sampling and spectral data modeling | 37 |
Figure 7-2 : Schematic image of regional magnetic contour data (after Lockwood et al., 1971) | 39 |
Figure 7-3 : Quartz Content (Upper), and Alunite Content (Lower) for Isabella Pearl, including Scarlet Area | 41 |
Figure 7-4 : Scarlet area Potential Target areas based on ASTER data analysis identified by TMS. | 42 |
Figure 7-5 : Isabella Pearl Mine (yellow star) and FGC land package on a Landsat image. | 43 |
Figure 7-6 : Isabella Pearl Mine Drill Hole Location Map | 45 |
Figure 7-7 : Location Map for Drill Holes Completed at Isabella Pearl Mine during 2021 | 49 |
Figure 8-1 : 2020 - 2021 SRM Performance | 56 |
Figure 8-2 : 2020 - 2021 Blank Material Performance | 57 |
Figure 8-3 : Au Field Duplicate Control Plot for 2020 - 2021 | 58 |
Figure 8-4 : Au Min Max Field Duplicate Control Plot for 2020 - 2021 | 58 |
Figure 8-5 : Cyanide Leach vs Fire Assay Comparison Plot | 59 |
Figure 8-6 : Bureau Veritas vs ALS Gold Assay Comparison Plot | 59 |
Figure 10-1 : Drill Hole Locations for 2017 WLMC Metallurgical Samples | 65 |
Figure 10-2 : Section of Sample Locations for WLMC Test Program in Relation to Ore Zone | 65 |
Figure 10-3 : Head Screen Analysis Showing Cumulative Weight Percent Passing Crush Size (in inches) | 68 |
Figure 10-4 : Bottle Roll Tests Showing % Gold Extraction During Leach Period | 70 |
Figure 10-5 : Bottle Roll Tests Showing % Silver Extraction during Leach Period | 70 |
Figure 10-6 : Column Leach Test Results Showing Cumulative Weight Percent Gold Extracted Over Days of Leach | 72 |
Figure 10-7 : Column Leach Gold Recovery Curves for Column Leach Tests Completed | 75 |
Figure 10-8 : Graph of Gold Ounces Placed vs. Gold Ounces Poured and Percent Gold Recovery | 77 |
Figure 11-1 : Plot of RQD vs. Elevation | 83 |
Figure 11-2 : Isometric View Looking North Showing Oxide Base (blue) and Granite (orange) Contacts | 84 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | x |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-3 : Isometric View of the Mineralization Domains comprising the Isabella Pearl Deposit | 85 |
Figure 11-4 : Histogram of Constrained Assay Sample Lengths | 86 |
Figure 11-5 : Log-Probability Plots of Au and Ag Composites | 87 |
Figure 11-6 : RC vs. DDH Drilling Results | 88 |
Figure 11-7 : Twin Hole Au Assay Grade Comparison | 89 |
Figure 11-8 : Log-Probability Plots of Composite Capping Thresholds | 90 |
Figure 11-9 : Experimental Semi-Variogams | 92 |
Figure 11-10 : Typical Cross-Section Looking NW Showing Gold Grades (g/t) and Classification | 94 |
Figure 13-1 Pit Slope Quadrants | 105 |
Figure 13-2 View looking South in the Pearl Pit showing continuous, moderately to shallowly-dipping shears of the Pearl Fault | 106 |
Figure 13-3 Water Monitoring Well Locations | 110 |
Figure 13-4 Isabella Pearl – Final Pit Plan View | 111 |
Figure 13-5 Isabella Pearl Designed Pits - Plan View | 112 |
Figure 13-6 Isabella Pearl Designed Pits - Section View | 113 |
Figure 13-7 Isabella Pearl Waste Rock Dump | 114 |
Figure 14-1 Simplified Schematic of Isabella Pearl Mine Flowsheet | 122 |
Figure 14-2 General Arrangement for the Isabella Pearl Heap Leach Pad and Ponds. | 125 |
Figure 14-3 ADR Plant General Arrangement | 127 |
Figure 15-1 : General Site Arrangement | 133 |
Figure 19-1 Graph of Isabella Pearl Sensitivity to Capex and Gold Price | 153 |
Figure 20-1 : WLMC’s regional land status highlighting Isabella Pearl, and other important mines and prospects. Outline shows FGC land position and red dots represent significant prospects or mines; blue stars indicate historic mines. | 155 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 1 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
1 | Executive Summary |
This is an Amended Technical Report Summary (TRS) for Walker Lane Minerals Corporation (WLMC), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortitude Gold Corporation (FGC), on its 100%-controlled Isabella Pearl mine, a producing open pit gold-silver heap leach operation in Mineral County, Nevada. The report was prepared by Gustavson Associates LLC, a Member of WSP, and provides a summary of the detailed assessments of mineral resources and mineral reserves and other relevant considerations of the Isabella Pearl mine.
On October 31, 2018, the SEC announced that it was adopting amendments to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, and related guidance, under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC, 2018 a, b). This report is prepared to comply with the new rule (17 CFR subpart 229.1300), requiring that a registrant with material mining operations must disclose specified information in Securities Act and Exchange Act filings concerning its mineral resources, in addition to its mineral reserves.
WLMC has received all regulatory permit approvals from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the Isabella Pearl mine. Construction of the Isabella Pearl mine was completed during 2019 and reached commercial production levels in October 2019.
1.1 | Property Summary and Ownership |
1.1.1 | Property Description |
The Isabella Pearl mine area covers approximately 436 hectares (1,078 acres) and consists of 61 unpatented lode mining claims on land owned by the U.S. government and administered by the BLM. WLMC controls 100% interest in the Isabella Pearl claims which are subject to a 3% NSR royalty.
WLMC also controls an additional 507 unpatented claims covering approximately 3,521 hectares (8,699 acres) along a nearly 30 km (19 mi) trend extending northwest of the Isabella Pearl mine.
1.2 | Mineral Resource Statement |
The modeling and estimation of mineral resources presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of December 31, 2021. WLMC models and estimates mineral resources from available technical information prior to the generation of mineral reserves.
As part of its modernization of the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, the SEC is adopting the Combined Reserves International Reporting Standards Committee (CRIRSCO) framework for reporting mineral resources. According to CRIRSCO, a mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of intrinsic economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust (a deposit) in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics, and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated, or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. Mineral resources are sub-divided, in order
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 2 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. Portions of a deposit that do not have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction must not be included in a mineral resource. The modeling and estimation of mineral resources utilized a portion of the drill hole database compiled by WLMC consisting of:
● | Air Track (AT): 6 drill holes for 82.0 m (269 ft) |
● | Reverse Circulation (RC): 513 drill holes for 46,229 m (151,670 ft) |
● | Diamond Drill (Core) Hole (DDH): 36 drill holes for 3,564.5 m (11,695 ft) |
Mineral resource modeling was carried out on capped composites using Inverse Distance Cubed (“ID3”), Ordinary Kriging (“OK”) and Nearest Neighbor (“NN”) estimation methods. A minimum of three and a maximum of twelve composites were used for estimation, within a search ellipsoid oriented parallel with each defined structure and extending 120 m (394 ft) x 120 m (394 ft) x 30 m (98 ft). The major and semi-major axes approximate the average strike and dip directions of the mineralization in each of the three estimation areas. Both gold and silver were estimated.
Mineral resources at Isabella Pearl are further defined by WLMC as mineral resources within a constraining pit shell and above a defined cut-off value. The mineral resources reported herein have been constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman (LG) optimized pit shell and reported at a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au (0.01 opst) for oxide mineral resources and 2.00 g/t Au (0.058 opst) for sulfide mineral resources.
The Measured and Indicated mineral resources reported for the Isabella Pearl deposit contain 598 thousand tonnes (659.2 thousand short tons) at an average gold grade of 2.12 g/t (0.062 opst) and 26 g/t silver (0.80 opst) (Table 1-1). Inferred mineral resources are estimated to be 288.2 thousand tonnes (317.7 thousand short tons) at an average gold grade of 1.55 g/t (0.045 opst) and 17 g/t silver (0.5 opst).
Table 1-1 : Mineral Resource Estimates (exclusive of Mineral Reserves) for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2021
Mea+Ind | 2.00 | 151,400 | 166,900 | 4.66 | 0.136 | 50 | 1.5 | 22,700 | 242,700 |
Inferred | 2.00 | 28,800 | 31,800 | 3.77 | 0.110 | 56 | 1.6 | 3,500 | 51,600 |
Total | Cut-off Au (g/t) | Tonnes | Short Tons | Au (g/t) | Au (opst) | Ag (g/t) | Ag (opst) | Au (oz) | Ag (oz) |
Measured | --- | 199,600 | 220,000 | 3.82 | 0.111 | 53 | 1.5 | 24,500 | 337,700 |
Indicated | --- | 398,400 | 439,200 | 1.27 | 0.037 | 12 | 0.4 | 16,300 | 158,900 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 3 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Mea+Ind | --- | 598,000 | 659,200 | 2.12 | 0.062 | 26 | 0.8 | 40,800 | 496,600 |
Inferred | --- | 288,200 | 317,700 | 1.55 | 0.045 | 17 | 0.5 | 14,400 | 154,400 |
Notes:
1. | Reported at a cut-off of 0.33 Au g/t (0.01 Au opst) for oxide mineral resources and 2.00 Au g/t (0.058 Au opst) for sulfide mineral resources. |
2. | Whole block diluted estimates reported within an optimized pit shell. |
3. | Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
4. | Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. |
5. | Mineral resources reported are exclusive of mineral reserves. |
1.3 | Mineral Reserve Statement |
Mineral reserves were prepared according to the guidelines of Regulation S-K part 1300. The reserve estimate is based on technical data and information available as of December 31, 2021.
The conversion of mineral resources to mineral reserves required accumulative knowledge achieved through LG pit optimization, detailed pit design, scheduling and associated modifying parameters. Detailed access, haulage, and operational cost criteria were applied in this process for the Isabella, Pearl and Civit Cat North deposits, the currently minable portions of the Isabella Pearl mine. The mine was built in metric units and all metal grades are in g/t.
The orientation, proximity to the topographic surface, and geological controls of the Isabella Pearl mineral reserves support mining with open pit mining techniques. To calculate the mineral reserve, pits were designed following an optimized LG pit based on a $1,738/oz Au sales price. This price was chosen to create the primary guide surface based on a price sensitivity and subsequent profitability study that showed that the $1,738 pit maximized profitability while reducing capital requirements. The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au (0.01 opst) which is based on the consensus 2022-2024 average price of $1,738/oz for gold (CIBC, 2021). The Isabella Pearl mine open pit mineral reserve statement is presented in Table 1-2.
The Proven and Probable mineral reserves reported for Isabella Pearl contain 1.36 million tonnes (1.50 million short tons) at an average gold grade of 2.78 g/t Au (0.081 opst) and 24 g/t Ag (0.7 opst) (Table 1-2). The high-grade and low-grade stockpiles of ore mined but not processed is included in the inventory of 2021 mineral reserves.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 4 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 1-2 : Mineral Reserve Estimates for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2021
Notes:
1. | Metal prices used for P&P reserves were $1,738 per ounce of gold and $23.22 per ounce of silver. These prices reflect the consensus 2022-2024 average prices for gold and silver (CIBC, 2021). |
2. | The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.33 Au g/t. |
3. | Mining, processing, energy, administrative and smelting/refining costs were based on 2021 actual costs for the Isabella Pearl mine. |
4. | Metallurgical gold recovery assumptions used were 81% for all ore which is currently being crushed. These recoveries reflect predicted average recoveries from metallurgical test programs. |
5. | P&P reserves are diluted and factored for expected mining recovery. |
6. | Figures in tables are rounded to reflect estimate precision and small differences generated by rounding are not material to estimates. |
1.4 | Geology and Mineralization |
1.4.1 | Geologic Setting, Mineralization, and Mineralization |
The Isabella Pearl mine is in the central portion of the Walker Lane, a major northwest-trending zone on the western border of Nevada characterized by a series of closely spaced dextral strike-slip faults that were active throughout much of the middle to late Cenozoic. It is a complex zone up to 300 km (186 mi) wide and 1,000 km (620 mi) long that lies on the western boundary of the Basin and Range Province.
Volcanic rocks of middle Tertiary age cover much of the property and include intermediate lava flows and ignimbrite ash flow sheets. The volcanic rocks unconformably overlie Mesozoic strata including Triassic and Jurassic sedimentary units and Cretaceous and Jurassic igneous units. Tectonic activity and erosion have left an irregular, dominantly buried surface of Mesozoic rocks. Within the regional Walker Lane tectonic setting, several major fault zones trend through the property and are dominated by various splays and off set branches. The Soda Springs Valley fault zone is a major host of mineralization in the area, and particularly along the Pearl fault strand.
The gold-silver mineralized zones include the Isabella, Pearl, Civit Cat North, Silica Knob, Scarlet North and South, and Crimson oxide deposits and the Pearl and Civit Cat North sulfide deposits, collectively referred to in this report as the Isabella Pearl deposit. Alteration and mineral assemblages at Isabella Pearl, including widespread argillic alteration and generally abundant alunite, indicate the deposits belong to the high-sulfidation class of epithermal mineral deposits. K-Ar age determinations indicate the mineralization is about 19 Ma, some 7 to 10 million years younger than the age of the host rocks. This
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 5 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
early Miocene age conforms to the age of other high-sulfidation epithermal precious-metal deposits in the Walker Lane area (e.g., Goldfield and Paradise Peak).
1.4.2 | Exploration |
Modern exploration of the general area around the Isabella Pearl mine began in the early 1970’s by various companies. From 1987 through 1990, Combined Metals Reduction Company (CMRC) drilled the Isabella Pearl area during its joint venture with Homestake Mining Company (Homestake). The joint venture drilled at least 175 reverse circulation (RC) and diamond drill (core) holes (DDH) before the joint venture was terminated. TXAU Investments, Inc. (TXAU), also known as TXAU Development Ltd. and Isabella Pearl LLC., conducted a DDH drilling program in early 2007 that consisted of 19 holes. This drilling was designed primarily to provide material for metallurgical testing and confirm the historic assay and geological data collected by the CMRC-Homestake joint venture. In 2008, TXAU completed 7 DDH’s in the Pearl deposit to address some issues concerning assays and insufficient quality assurance/quality control measures from prior drilling. From 2016 through 2021, WLMC executed RC and DDH drilling programs to collect representative mineralized ore grade samples in the mine area in sufficient quantity to conduct metallurgical testing and expand resources. In addition, WLMC completed a 5-hole RC condemnation drill program to ensure no mineral resources occurred where the mine/plant facilities are located. The Isabella Pearl mine drilling history is summarized in Table 1-3.
Table 1-3 : Drilling History at the Isabella Pearl Mine (1987 - 2021)
Company | Period | RC | DDH (Core) | Total | |||
No. | Meters | No. | Meters | No. | Meters | ||
Combined Metals-Homestake & Historical | 1987-1990 | 182 | 19,598.6 | 6 | 513 | 188 | 20,111.6 |
TXAU | 2007-2008 | - | - | 26 | 2,315.7 | 26 | 2,315.7 |
WLMC* | 2016-2021 | 350 | 28,298.9 | 1 | 249.9 | 351 | 28,548.8 |
WLMC Met Holes | 2016-2017 | - | - | 3 | 484.9 | 3 | 484.9 |
Totals | 532 | 47,897.5 | 36 | 3,564.50 | 568 | 51,462.0 | |
*Includes 6 Air Track (AT) drill holes |
1.5 | Metallurgy and Mineral Processing |
Metallurgical test work has validated that Isabella Pearl oxidized ores are amenable to gold and silver recovery by cyanidation. The most economically effective process has been identified as conventional heap leaching of crushed ore, and to a much lesser extent ROM, followed by absorption/desorption recovery (ADR) and refining to produce doré bars.
Cyanidation test work (bottle roll and column leach), performed on representative samples of the mineral resources, confirms the close relationship between particle size and gold recovery. The greater the fines
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 6 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
fraction the higher the gold recovery. Based on the metallurgical test work completed, total gold recovery is expected over a four-month period.
Mineral reserves above 0.61 g/t Au are being crushed to a P80 of 5/8 inch and placed directly on the heap. Mineral reserves between 0.33 and 0.61 g/t Au are being stockpiled for either future crushing or blending with the higher-grade material. The total predicted gold recovery for all ore is 81% ore which is currently being crushed. The gold recovery projection for ore is based primarily on column leach test work and partly on benchmarking other heap leach operations.
Over the life-of-mine (LOM), ore is delivered from the open pit, the majority being trucked to the crusher, and then transported to the heap leach pad via an overland conveyor and stacked onto the heap leach pad by a radial stacker. A minor amount of ROM ore was previously placed directly on the heap leach pad by truck.
1.6 | Mine Design, Optimization and Scheduling |
Isabella Pearl is a disseminated gold and silver deposit with mineralization close to the surface at an average head grade of 2.78 g/t Au and 24 g/t Ag. It was determined that mining would be performed with an open pit truck/loader operation. Initial costs were estimated, and a detailed feasibility study analysis performed to determine the optimum ultimate mining limit for the operation. Average operating costs at the property are approximately 2.6 $/t for mining, 2.8 $/t for crushing and 6.9 $/t for leaching and solution treatment at the Isabella Pearl processing facility.
The current mine design consists of one main pit and several smaller sub-pits accessing the Isabella, Pearl and Civit Cat North deposits. Open pit mining is by conventional diesel-powered equipment, utilizing a combination of blasthole drills, wheel loaders, and 91-tonne (100-short ton) trucks to handle ore and waste. Support equipment including of graders, track dozers, and water trucks also aid in the mining. High-grade ore (>0.61 g/t Au) is hauled to the crushing area and crushed before being placed on the leach pad. Low-grade ore between 0.33 and 0.61 g/t Au is hauled directly to the low-grade stockpile. Waste rock is stored in the waste rock facility designed near the pit to reduce haulage costs.
1.7 | Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups |
The Isabella Pearl mine is located on public lands administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, BLM. As such, the operation requires the identified federal permits, the most important of which are approvals of the Plan of Operations (POO) and its subsequent National Environmental Policy Act Evaluation (NEPA) analyses. WLMC submitted the POO and Reclamation Permit applications and the Environmental Assessment (EA). The BLM has reviewed baseline data and deemed the POO “complete” and authorized processing of the EA of the operations. The NEPA analysis was completed, and a Record of Decision (ROD) issued on May 15, 2018.
WLMC holds the following Federal Permits and Registrations:
● | EPA Hazardous Waste #NVR000092916 (BWM) |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 7 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | Explosive Permit #9-NV-009-20-8K-00321 (Ledcor CMI Inc. contract mining) |
● | POO and Reclamation Plan #NVN86663 (BLM) |
The mine also required permits from various State of Nevada agencies including: Bureau of Air Pollution Control (BAPC), Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation (BMRR), BWM, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), NDEP and Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW).
The State of Nevada requires operational mining permits regardless of land status of the mine (i.e., private, or public). The following are the state permits that are required for the Isabella Pearl mine:
● | Reclamation Permit #0387 (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | Hazardous Waste Generator #NVR000092916 (NDEP/BWM) |
● | Water Pollution Control Permit #NEV2009102 (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | Emergency Release, Response, and Contingency Plan (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit #NVG201000 (NDEP/BWPC) |
● | General Stormwater Permit #NVR300000 MSW-43292 (NDEP/BWPC) |
● | Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (NDEP/BWPC) |
● | Water Rights – #83484, 82498, 79096 and 83485 (changed to 89001T) (DCNR/NDWR); Permits to change the point of diversion and place of use of the water rights have been approved, for groundwater production wells |
● | Air Quality Class II Operating Permit #AP-1041-3853 (NDEP/BAPC) |
● | Air Quality Mercury Permit to Construct #AP-1041-3895 (NDEP/BAPC) |
● | Air Quality Class I Operating Permit to Construct #AP-1041-3897 (NDEP/BAPC) |
● | Industrial Artificial Pond Permit #467428 (NDOW) |
● | Bureau of Safe Drinking Water Public Water Source Permit NV0001178 |
WLMC has obtained a Special Use Permit and Building Permits issued by Mineral County to construct buildings at the Isabella Pearl mine including:
● | Mineral County Business License #17288 (Mineral County Sheriff’s Office) |
● | Special Use Permit #165957 (Mineral County Planning Commission) |
● | Septic Permit #7905 and 7906 (Mineral County Building Department) |
● | ADR Building Permit #5891 (Mineral County Fire Marshall) |
● | Office Building Permit #7888 (Mineral County Fire Marshall) |
● | Water Tank Building Permit #7921 (Mineral County Fire Marshall) |
By virtue of the mine’s location and current land ownership, the mine operations were subject to reclamation financial surety requirements set by the BLM and State of Nevada. The cost associated with final reclamation and closure of the Isabella Pearl mine is currently set at $12 million.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 8 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
1.8 | Capital Costs, Operating Costs and Financial Analysis |
1.8.1 | Capital and Operating Costs |
WLMC has provided an estimate of capital and operating costs in this report.
Total Isabella Pearl Mine LOM capital expenditures are estimated to be US$ 2.475 million. The capital costs are based on vendor and specialist quotations. Additional contingencies have been applied to these estimates for omissions. The support for capital and operating costs are based on quotations and estimates in 2021 dollars. No inflation factors have been used in the economic projections.
Mining costs are based on actual costs derived from the Isabella Pearl mine. These costs comprise ore and waste drilling and blasting, loading, and hauling and all the associated site maintenance including, pits, roads, stockpiles, dumps, tailings storage facilities, and storm water controls etc.
Processing costs are based on actual processing costs including but not limited to reagent consumption and current prices for wear and replacement parts.
Current supervisory and administrative support staff numbers are sufficient to efficiently handle the administrative, technical and management functions required for the mining operation. Provisions for training, and regulatory mandated safety functions are also included.
The Isabella Pearl Mine LOM Operating Cash Costs per Tonne Processed is estimated at US$44.13 per tonne. This is based on a total ore processed of 1.0 million tonnes (1.1 million short tons). The estimated remaining mine life is 3 years, with continued gold production from the leach pad for a 4th year.
Capital and operating costs are based on a production budget and realized costs to date, and are judged to be within 5% accuracy.
1.8.2 | Economic Analysis |
WLMC has provided an economic analysis in this report.
The Isabella Pearl mine has a 3-year mine-life given the mineral reserves described in this report. The financial results of this report have been prepared on an annual basis. Capital and operating costs are based on realized costs, quotations and estimates in 2021 dollars. No inflation factors have been used in the economic projections. The analysis assumes static conditions for the gold market price over the three-year mine-life. The gold and silver prices were set at $1,738/oz and $23.22/oz, respectively. These prices are based on the consensus 2022-2024 average prices.
This economic analysis is a post-tax evaluation and is based on a base case $1,738 per ounce gold price and an assumption that the gold would be recovered over the remaining 3-year mine-life.
The economic results, at a discount rate of 5%, indicate a Net Present Value (NPV) of $100.6 million (after estimated taxes). The following provides the basis of the Isabella Pearl LOM plan and economics:
● | A mine life of 3 years, with continued gold production from the leach pad for 4 years; |
● | An average operating cost of $483/ Au oz.-produced; |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 9 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | Sustaining capital costs of $2.475 million and a mine closure cost estimate of $12 million; |
● | The analysis does not include any allowance for end of mine salvage value. |
1.9 | Conclusions and Recommendations |
1.9.1 | Interpretation and Conclusions |
Isabella Pearl is a producing gold mine with a favorable economic projection based on current operating costs and detailed LOM mining and processing plan. The Isabella Pearl deposit has the grade and continuity required for on-going production.
The Isabella Pearl deposit geology is generally well understood, and structural geology and alteration are the primary controls on mineralization. The core of the deposit is relatively well-defined but recent infill and step-out drilling has materially changed the current mineral resource model, increasing the confidence level of the mineral resource estimate, and allowing conversion of a significant portion of this material to mineral reserve. Drilling to the northwest of the deposit also has the potential to extend the mineral resources. In addition, reconnaissance geological mapping and rock chip sampling have delineated new, surface high-grade gold target areas further along strike to the northwest of the Isabella Pearl deposit.
Certain factors pose potential risks and opportunities, of greater or lesser degree, to the estimate as the mineral resources are based on currently available data. The highest risks associated with key estimation parameters were identified as:
● | Core Recovery: Rock Quality Designation (RQD) results show a wide range of recoveries, which may bias assay grades. |
● | Bulk Density: Significant voids may reduce recoverable tonnage (Specific gravity is not well constrained). |
The predicted mineral resource grades are confirmed at the mining scale using blast-hole drilling results and grade control modeling.
Reconciliations are performed on a monthly basis by the operations department in order to track and compare actual tonnages and grades to the estimated values in the block model. To date, the reconciliations have proved that the estimated tonnages are in line with the values in the block model and that actual grades are slightly higher than estimated, especially in the Pearl deposit.
All refractory sulfide material has been treated as waste for the Isabella Pearl estimate of mineral resources. In addition, the bottom of the optimized pit shell is designed to stay above the water table.
The conversion of mineral resources to mineral reserves required accumulative knowledge achieved through LG pit optimization, detailed pit design, scheduling and associated modifying parameters. The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au which is based on the three-year trailing average $1,738/oz Au sales price used for this mineral reserve estimate. The Proven and Probable mineral reserves as of December 31, 2021, reported for the Isabella Pearl mine, using diluted grades, is 1.36 million tonnes (1.50 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 10 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
of 2.78 g/t Au (0.081 opst) and 24 g/t Ag (0.7 opst) containing 121,500 ounces of gold and 1,057,600 ounces of silver. The mineral reserve estimate presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of December 31, 2021.
Isabella Pearl is a disseminated gold and silver deposit with mineralization close to the surface. The mine design consists of one main pit accessing the Isabella Pearl deposit. Open pit mining is by conventional diesel-powered equipment, utilizing a combination of blasthole drills, wheel loaders, and 91-tonne (100-short ton) trucks to handle ore and waste.
The Isabella Pearl oxide ore is amenable to heap leach cyanidation with a high relative recovery and fast leaching kinetics.
The Isabella Pearl mine is economically viable at the consensus 2022-2024 average gold price of $1,738 per ounce gold as well as at the current higher gold prices and has significant economic potential given the possibility for gold price increases in the future. Additionally, there is opportunity to expand the mineral reserve through additional drilling. Cost improvements and further optimizations are also possible.
The Isabella Pearl mine’s economic viability is generally at risk from changes in external factors which would lead to increased input costs, or a fall in the price of gold which would reduce revenue. A decrease in gold price would not only reduce revenue but would also reduce the amount of economically mineable ore as a decrease in metal prices could result in a higher cut-off grade. Under the current gold price environment, the mineral reserves are considered robust.
Environmental and future permitting risks include items being discovered on the mine site such as sensitive or endangered botany, or cultural artifacts. No environmental and permitting risks have been identified.
Internal risks, specific to the Isabella Pearl mine, include:
● | Current drill spacing is considered adequate but there is a low risk of a decrease in mineral resources due to additional drilling and subsequent re-modeling and re-estimations. |
● | Poor operational execution, with resultant cost and schedule over-runs, scope creep, and increased operating costs. This is mitigated by management overseeing production. |
● | Predicted gold recovery from the Isabella Pearl ore is based on the results of column-leach tests and actual results could be lower than expected. This risk is deemed to be low, given the numerous metallurgical tests that have been conducted on the Isabella Pearl mineral resources during the past 30 years. |
● | Finding and keeping the skilled employees required to operate the Isabella Pearl mine has proven to be challenging, given its rural location. Inadequate staffing can increase operating costs by reducing operating efficiencies and increasing repair and maintenance costs. Recruiting costs might be higher than predicted. |
The Qualified Persons (QP’s) preparing this report for WLMC recommend continued open pit mining and processing the ore by screening, stacking, heap leaching and ADR to produce gold doré for sale.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 11 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
1.9.2 | Recommendations |
The QP’s preparing this report for WLMC recommend that the Isabella Pearl mine continue with open pit mining and processing the ore by screening, stacking, heap leaching, ADR and doré production. Some additional studies are recommended that may improve value and optimizations including additional drilling to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves.
Recommendations for mineral reserve drilling at the Isabella Pearl mine are shown in Table 1-4. The estimated cost of the recommendation for 6,096 m (20,000 ft) of RC drilling totals $1,460,000. The cost of this recommended work has not been included in the Isabella Pearl cash-flow model.
Table 1-4 : Summary of Costs for Optional Recommended Work
Description | Cost |
RC Drilling for Reserves | $1,460,000 |
Total | $1,460,000 |
Additional optimization could include an ore control methodology implementation that further minimizes sulfide material being placed on the leach pad. This sulfide material, mainly located at or near the bottom of the pit, is refractory and is treated as waste. A geometallurgical model to further characterize mineral resources should also be considered.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 12 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
2 | Introduction |
2.1 | Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report |
Gustavson Associates LLC (Gustavson), was contracted to produce a Technical Report Summary (TRS) on the Isabella Pearl mine, an open pit gold heap leach operation located in Mineral County, Nevada for the Walker Lane Minerals Company (WLMC). WLMC is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of FGC. The TRS is to support of the required annual reporting of FGC.
The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort by the QP’s, based on: 1) information available at the time of preparation, 2) data supplied by outside sources, and 3) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. The responsibility for this disclosure remains with WLMC.
This report provides mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, and a classification of mineral reserves prepared in accordance with §§ 229.1300 through 229.1305 (subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K) referred to simply as “S-K 1300” in this report.
2.2 | Source of Data and Information |
WLMC has relied on information and technical documents listed in the References section of this report which are assumed to be accurate and complete in all material aspects.
The reader is referred to earlier reports on mineral resources and reserves and the feasibility study for a more detailed description of the sources of information relied upon by the QP’s of WLMC (Brown et al., 2018, 2021).
2.3 | Details of Inspection |
Christopher Emanuel and Ian Crundwell are the QP’s who visited Isabella Pearl mine on December 14 and 15, 2021.
2.4 | Previous Reports on Mine |
This report updates a previous report titled “Report on the Estimate of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves for the Isabella Pearl Mine” dated March 24, 2021 (Brown et. al., 2021)
The effective date of this report is December 31, 2021.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 13 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
3 | Property Description and Location |
3.1 | Location |
The Isabella Pearl mine is located in the Gabbs Valley Range, approximately 10 km (6 mi) north of the town of Luning in Mineral County, Nevada. The closest town with full services is Hawthorne located 40 km (25 mi) to the west (Fig. 3.1). The mine is located within all or portions of the following Townships, Ranges, and Sections relative to the Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian:
● | Township 8 North, Range 34 East, Section 03; and |
● | Township 9 North, Range 34 East, Sections 26, 27, 34 and 35. |
The approximate center of the deposit areas is N38.60°, W118.18° (UTM 397,665 E, 4,273,011 N, Zone 11). The mine has good connections to the infrastructure of west-central Nevada, with access roads to the mine site linking to Nevada state route 361 and US Route 95, the main highway between Reno and Las Vegas.
Figure 3-1 : General Location Map of the Isabella Pearl Mine
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 14 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
3.2 | Area of the Property |
The Isabella Pearl mine area covers approximately 436 hectares (1,078 acres) and consists of 61 unpatented lode mining claims on land owned by the U.S. government and administered by the BLM. WLMC controls 100% interest in the Isabella Pearl claims which are subject to a 3% NSR royalty. WLMC also controls an additional 507 claims covering approximately 3,521 hectares (8,699 acres) along a nearly 30 km (19 mi) trend extending northwest of the Isabella Pearl mine.)
3.3 | Mineral Titles, Claims, Rights, Leases and Options |
Mineral claims in the mine area are shown in Figure 3-2. The claims within the mine area controlled by WLMC, its entities, or partners are listed in Table 3-1 and are current as of December 31, 2021.
Currently, annual claim maintenance fees are the only federal payments related to unpatented mining claims. Annual maintenance fees of $100,572 were paid to the BLM during 2021 to hold the 568 unpatented lode mining claims. In addition, fees for filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) totaling $6,852 were paid to Mineral County in order to hold the claims for another year.
There are no Tribal, State of Nevada or U.S. Forest Service lands within the mine area.
Figure 3-2 : Isabella Pearl Mine Area Mineral Claims Map
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 15 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 3-1 : List of Mineral Claims for the Isabella Pearl Mine
Claim Name & No. | Type | BLM Serial | Loc Date | Mineral Cnty Doc | Owner | Status | Acquisition History |
VULTURE DOG # 1 | Unpat Lode | NMC84621 | 7/17/1979 | 39154 | WLMC | 100% Owned | Acq from TXAU |
VULTURE DOG # 2 | Unpat Lode | NMC84622 | 7/17/1979 | 39155 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 3 | Unpat Lode | NMC84623 | 7/17/1979 | 39156 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 4 | Unpat Lode | NMC84624 | 7/17/1979 | 39157 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 5 | Unpat Lode | NMC84625 | 7/17/1979 | 39158 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 6 | Unpat Lode | NMC84626 | 7/17/1979 | 39159 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 7 | Unpat Lode | NMC84627 | 7/17/1979 | 39160 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 8 | Unpat Lode | NMC84628 | 7/17/1979 | 39161 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 9 | Unpat Lode | NMC84629 | 7/17/1979 | 39162 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 10 | Unpat Lode | NMC84630 | 7/17/1979 | 39163 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 11 | Unpat Lode | NMC84631 | 7/17/1979 | 39164 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 12 | Unpat Lode | NMC84632 | 7/17/1979 | 39165 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 13 | Unpat Lode | NMC84633 | 7/17/1979 | 39166 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 14 | Unpat Lode | NMC84634 | 7/17/1979 | 39167 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 15 | Unpat Lode | NMC84635 | 7/17/1979 | 39168 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 16 | Unpat Lode | NMC84751 | 7/17/1979 | 39169 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
VULTURE DOG # 22 | Unpat Lode | NMC315752 | 6/21/1984 | 68277 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 6 | Unpat Lode | NMC405057 | 2/27/1987 | 79813 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 7 | Unpat Lode | NMC405058 | 2/27/1987 | 79814 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 8 | Unpat Lode | NMC405059 | 2/27/1987 | 79815 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 9 | Unpat Lode | NMC405060 | 2/27/1987 | 79816 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 10 | Unpat Lode | NMC405061 | 2/27/1987 | 79817 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 11 | Unpat Lode | NMC405062 | 2/27/1987 | 79818 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 12 | Unpat Lode | NMC405063 | 2/27/1987 | 79819 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 13 | Unpat Lode | NMC405064 | 2/27/1987 | 79820 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 19 | Unpat Lode | NMC405070 | 2/27/1987 | 79826 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 23 | Unpat Lode | NMC405074 | 2/27/1987 | 79830 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 24 | Unpat Lode | NMC405075 | 2/27/1987 | 79831 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 25 | Unpat Lode | NMC405076 | 2/27/1987 | 79832 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 26 | Unpat Lode | NMC405077 | 2/27/1987 | 79833 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 36 | Unpat Lode | NMC405087 | 2/27/1987 | 79843 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 49 | Unpat Lode | NMC405100 | 2/27/1987 | 79856 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 50 | Unpat Lode | NMC405101 | 2/27/1987 | 79857 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 51 | Unpat Lode | NMC405102 | 2/27/1987 | 79858 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA # 52 | Unpat Lode | NMC405103 | 2/27/1987 | 79859 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA 37 | Unpat Lode | NMC602527 | 5/10/1990 |
| WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA 38 | Unpat Lode | NMC602528 | 5/10/1990 |
| WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA 5 | Unpat Lode | NMC636629 | 9/18/1991 |
| WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODA 32 | Unpat Lode | NMC636630 | 9/18/1991 |
| WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 20 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185560 | 11/16/2018 | 170004 | WLMC | 100% Owned | Acq from TXAU (WLMC reloc of SODA claims) |
SODAR 21 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185561 | 11/16/2018 | 170005 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 22 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185562 | 11/16/2018 | 170006 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 33 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185563 | 11/16/2018 | 170007 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 34 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185564 | 11/16/2018 | 170008 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 35 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185565 | 11/16/2018 | 170009 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 46 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185566 | 11/16/2018 | 170010 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 47 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185567 | 11/16/2018 | 170011 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
SODAR 48 | Unpat Lode | NMC1185568 | 11/16/2018 | 170012 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
ISABELLA # 12 | Unpat Lode | NMC170214 | 9/1/1980 | 45607 | WLMC | WLMC 50% Own WLMC 50% Lse | Acq From TXAU (WLMC 50% - Hayes et al 50%) |
ISABELLA # 13 | Unpat Lode | NMC170215 | 9/1/1980 | 45608 | WLMC | same | Acq from TXAU |
ISABELLA # 14 | Unpat Lode | NMC170216 | 9/1/1980 | 45609 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 15 | Unpat Lode | NMC170217 | 9/1/1980 | 45610 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 16 FRAC | Unpat Lode | NMC170218 | 9/1/1980 | 45611 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 17 FRAC | Unpat Lode | NMC170219 | 9/21/1980 | 45612 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 19 FRAC | Unpat Lode | NMC170221 | 9/28/1980 | 45614 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 1 | Unpat Lode | NMC235711 | 1/30/1982 | 56931 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 2 | Unpat Lode | NMC235712 | 1/30/1982 | 56932 | WLMC | same | |
ISABELLA # 3 | Unpat Lode | NMC235713 | 1/30/1982 | 56933 | WLMC | same | |
TDG 1 | Unpat Lode | NMC989539 | 3/23/2008 | 146107 | WLMC | 100% Owned | Acq From Gateway Gold (USA) Corp. |
TDG 2 | Unpat Lode | NMC989540 | 3/23/2008 | 146108 | WLMC | 100% Owned | |
TDG 3 | Unpat Lode | NMC989541 | 3/23/2008 | 146109 | WLMC | 100% Owned |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 16 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
3.4 | Other Significant Factors and Risks |
The mine is in production, and the QP’s are not aware of any factors or pending changes that would impact the continued operation or its profitability.
3.5 | Royalties and Agreements |
WLMC owns an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest and leases the remaining fifty percent (50%) interest in ten (10) claims from Natasha Matkin-Hayes et al. of Las Vegas, Nevada. This affects the following claims:
● | Isabella Claims 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14 and 15, and |
● | Isabella Fractions 16, 17, 19. |
The Matkin-Hayes lease, dated April 1, 1992, was recorded by memorandum dated June 15, 1992, in Book 146 OR, page 978 (Mineral County, Nevada), and executed by Sarah D. Narkus, Natasha Matkin-Hayes, William Longhurst, John Longhurst, Caroline Merrick, Marguerite Cole, and Combined Metals Reduction Company (CRMC). TXAU succeeded to CMRC’s interest in the lease pursuant to a Trustee’s Deed, dated August 13, 1999, recorded May 14, 2004, Doc # 131124, executed by First American Title Insurance Company in Favor of TXAU. WLMC purchased a 50% undivided interest in lessor’s interest in the lease including a 50% interest in a 6% gross receipts production royalty, and a 50% ownership of the subject property. WLMC received an assignment of the lessee’s interest in the lease. The assignment of the lessee’s interest in the lease transferred the benefit of advance royalty payments that had been paid to lessors through August 2016, in the amount of $459,800.
On October 23, 2018, Ely Gold Royalties Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary Nevada Select Royalty, Inc., entered into a binding letter agreement with a private individual to acquire 100% of all rights and interests in 0.75% (three quarters of one percent) of the 3% NSR royalty on the 10 Isabella claims controlled by the Matkin-Hayes Lease.
WLMC owns 100% interest in the remaining 26 of the 36 claims comprising the Isabella Pearl mine subject to a reservation of a 3% net smelter return (NSR) royalty and royalty agreement in favor of TXAU. This affects the following claims:
● | Vulture Dog 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 22, |
● | Soda 8, 32, 36, 37, 38, 49, 50, 51 and 52, and |
● | Sodar 21, 33, 34, 35, 46, 47 and 48. |
On March 6, 2019, WLMC acquired 100% of all rights and interests in the TDG-1, 2 and 3 claims held by Gateway Gold (USA) Corporation (Gateway) subject to a reservation of a 3% NSR royalty and royalty agreement in favor of Gateway. These 3 claims are within the Isabella Pearl mine area.
On October 29, 2020, Nevada Select Royalty Inc. assigned to Gold Resource Corporation (GRC), currently FGC, the parent company of WLMC, fifty percent (50%) of its one-fourth (25%) royalty interest of the 3% gross receipts royalty payable from production at the 10 Isabella claims controlled by the Matkin-Hayes Lease.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 17 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
4 | Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography |
4.1 | Topography, Elevation and Vegetation |
The mine is within the Basin and Range province, a major physiographic region of the western United States. The region is typified by north-northeast trending mountain ranges separated by broad, flat alluvium filled valleys. Locally, the mountain ranges trend northwesterly, making this area rather anomalous in relation to typical Nevada physiography. Elevations on the mine site range from a minimum of 1,597 m (5,240 ft) in the valley to a maximum of 1,777 m (5,829 ft) at the uppermost elevation.
Typical high desert vegetation, controlled in part by elevation, is present in the area, including Pinion Pine and Juniper trees, wild rosebush and several varieties of sagebrush, cacti, and short grasses.
4.2 | Accessibility and Transportation to the Property |
The mine site is in Mineral County and is accessible from Hawthorne, Nevada via well maintained paved roads and maintained dirt roads. From Hawthorne, travel east on U.S. Highway 95 40 km (25 mi) to Nevada State Route 361 which is just west of the town of Luning. Turn north on State Route 361 and travel approximately 8.4 km (5.2 mi) to the county-maintained Rabbit Springs road that turns off to the west. The mine site lies about 1.6 km (1 mi) to the north along a dirt road that turns off approximately 1.6 km (1 mi) west of State Route 361. Mine roads provide access within the mine site and are passable by high clearance two-wheel drive vehicles. The mine area, encompassing about 436 hectares (1,078 acres) (see Figure 4.1), is located at the west foot of the Gabbs Valley Range in all or parts of Sections 27, 34 and 35 of Township 9 North, Range 34 East and Section 3 of Township 8 North, Range 34 East, Mount Diablo Baseline & Meridian (MDB&M).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 18 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 4-1 : Isabella Pearl Mine Access
4.3 | Climate and Length of Operating Season |
The climate is dry, semi-arid, with annual precipitation of approximately 11.4 cm (4.5 in), as documented at the nearby Mina Meteorological Station. Average temperatures range from -3° to 10° C (26° to 50° F) in the winter to highs exceeding 32° C (90° F) in the summer. Historically, the record low temperature, recorded in January 2003, is -19° C (-3° F), and the record high temperature, recorded in July 2002, is 42° C (108° F). The general area is drained by numerous stream channels originating in the mountains. These are typically dry but carry some runoff onto alluvial fans and into playas during summer thunderstorms.
The mine is accessible and can be operated year-round.
4.4 | Sufficiency of Surface Rights |
All mineral resources and mineral reserves in this report are located on unpatented lode mining claims controlled by WLMC. WLMC has sufficient claims to cover all surface operations for the life of mine. As described elsewhere in this report, WLMC has secured and maintained the necessary permits for exploration and development of the Isabella Pearl mine.
4.5 | Infrastructure Availability and Sources |
4.5.1 | Power |
Power is currently supplied by three diesel-powered electric generators. One 1500 kW generator is on-line, one 1500 kW generator is on standby and another 200 kW generator is on standby for the production wells to generate power for the well pumps if the need arises. The total connected force in the plant, including the crushers, is approximately 1,567 hp. WLMC has installed 4,160 volt direct burial power lines
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 19 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
from the generator yard throughout the site and to the production wells, IPPW-1, IPPW-2, and IPPW-3. Fuel for the generators is stored in two above-ground tanks on graded areas with HDPE-lined floors and berms for secondary containment to provide emergency capture of 110-percent of the largest fuel tank/vessel volume.
4.5.2 | Water |
Industrial water is supplied from three production water wells. Production Well #2 (IPPW-2) was completed in September 2013 to a depth of 128 m (420 ft) and is upgradient from both the heap leach and open pit. Production Well #1 was installed in October 2016 to a depth of 396 m (1,300 ft) and is located south of the processing facility. Production Well #3 was installed in August 2019 to approximately the same depth as Well #1 and is also located south of the processing facility. Permits for the production water wells and a maximum of 484 acre-feet of water annually (300 gpm 24/7) have been issued by the Nevada State Engineer.
4.5.3 | Mining Personnel |
There is considerable expertise in mining operations and management available from population centers within about 240 km (150 mi) of the mine. Nevada is an active mining state, with emphasis on open-pit gold operations. Mining personnel have been drawn from the cities of Reno/Sparks, Carson, Fernley and Fallon, the towns of Hawthorne and Yerington, as well as from other smaller communities in west-central Nevada. WLMC manpower currently totals 56 full-time employees.
4.5.4 | Tailings Storage Area |
The current heap leach operation does not include any tailings. Spent ore from the heap leach pad remains on the synthetic liner upon which it was constructed. Heap closure is addressed in the plan of operations (POO).
4.5.5 | Waste Disposal Area |
The primary waste-rock disposal area is a valley fill located to the south of the Isabella Pearl main pit.
4.5.6 | Heap Leach Pad Area |
The heap leach pad site a has sufficient capacity for the planned operation and potential expansion. It is also proximal to a water source and the mining areas to optimize operational efficiency.
4.5.7 | Processing Plant Site |
The location of the processing plant is adjacent to and down-gradient of the heap leach pad facilitating gravity flow of solutions.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 20 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
5 | History |
The Isabella Pearl mine is in the Santa Fe Mining District which lies within the Walker Lane Mineral Belt. Although the district was discovered in the late 19th century, no work on the Isabella Pearl mine area was done until the 1930’s when the Gilbert brothers completed a 120 m (400 ft) drift at Isabella. The brothers encountered up to one ounce of gold per ton in spots, but no economic material was produced. The Gilbert brothers then worked the Civit Cat mine, located about 1.6 km (1 mi) to the west (different than the Civit Cat North portion of the Isabella Pearl mineral resources and reserves discussed herein), and were rumored to have produced $80,000 worth of gold.
5.1 | Prior Ownership and Ownership Changes |
The Isabella mine was held by B. Narkaus until 1978 and was subsequently leased by Joe Morris the same year. Mr. Morris and three partners re-located some of the Isabella claims and subsequently leased them to the Combined Metals Reduction Company (Combined Metals). In 1987, Combined Metals entered into a joint-venture with Homestake Mining Company (Homestake) to explore and develop the Isabella claims and surrounding areas. The Combined Metals-Homestake joint venture was terminated in 1990. Combined Metals continued to maintain the claims but encumbered the property by borrowing over two million dollars from Repadre International Corporation (Repadre). Repadre initiated foreclosure action in 2002, and Combined Metals immediately filed for bankruptcy to forestall the foreclosure. In March 2004, the note held by Repadre was purchased by TXAU Investments Ltd. and TXAU Development Ltd., both Texas corporations (TXAU). The Combined Metals bankruptcy action was dismissed in May 2004, the note was foreclosed on, and the Isabella Pearl mine mining claims (including the 36 claims covering the Isabella, Pearl and Civit Cat deposits) were transferred to TXAU.
On August 12, 2016, Walker Lane Mineral Corp.’s (WLMC) parent company GRC (predecessor company prior to spin-off to FGC) acquired all of the outstanding stock of WLMC, a private entity held by TXAU, which controlled the Isabella Pearl mine, in exchange for 2,000,000 shares of GRC’s common stock valued at $13.1 million and cash of $152,885. At the time of acquisition by WLMC, the Isabella Pearl mine was in the advanced stages of engineering and production permitting.
5.2 | Exploration and Development Results of Previous Owners |
In the early 1970’s, Ventures West Minerals Ltd. and Brican Resources formed a joint venture for exploration of the general area around the Isabella Pearl mine. Later in the decade, the joint venture with Westley Explorations, Inc., successor to Ventures West, discovered low-grade gold mineralization in the Santa Fe Mine area, just south of and across the highway from the Isabella Pearl mine. In 1983, the Santa Fe property was joint ventured with Lacana Gold Inc., and later 100% interest was acquired by Lacana’s successor, Corona Gold Inc. The Calvada deposit, just to the east was explored by a CoCa Mines Inc. - Amax Gold Inc. joint venture prior to purchase by Corona Gold. The Santa Fe and Calvada mines, along with two other satellite deposits, were subsequently developed by Corona Gold as the Santa Fe open pit mine and heap leach operation. In 1992, Corona Gold was acquired by Homestake which completed mining at Santa Fe in December 1994. In late 2008, the Santa Fe property was acquired and further explored by Victoria Gold Corp. (Victoria). In 2021, Victoria sold the Santa Fe property to Lahontan Gold Corp.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 21 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
In 1980, Fischer-Watt Mining Company acquired claims, northwestward from the Santa Fe mine property, for the purpose of exploring for bonanza gold-silver vein systems. They completed a stream sediment geochemical survey and a rock geochemical survey in portions of the property, fluid inclusion temperature determinations, some alteration mapping, and additional claim staking. Fischer-Watt subsequently joint-ventured the property with Ventures West Minerals, and additional work included geologic mapping at a scale of 1 inch = 500 feet, additional rock chip geochemistry, limited induced polarization and resistivity geophysical surveys, and nine rotary and DDH holes in the Copper Cliffs West exploration area. Although the drill holes did not encounter economic mineralization, Fischer-Watt concluded: “…the HY system clearly warrants further evaluation”. Combined Metals subsequently entered into a joint venture agreement with Fischer-Watt in 1982. That joint venture was dissolved during 1983 with Combined Metals acquiring Fischer-Watt’s interest in the claims. These claims, along with the acquisition of additional claims and leases, including the Isabella claim group assembled by Norsemont Mining Corporation in 1984, ultimately totaled more than 1,000 claims along the northwesterly trend.
Combined Metals drilled the Isabella deposit plus a limited number of exploration holes in a few of the other exploration areas during its joint venture with Homestake from 1988 through 1990. The joint venture drilled at least 175 RC and DDH holes before the joint venture was terminated.
TXAU conducted a DDH drilling program in early 2007 that consisted of 19 holes for a total of 1,187 m (3,894 ft) of HQ-sized core. This drilling was designed primarily to provide material for metallurgical testing and confirm the historic assay and geological data collected by the Combined Metals- Homestake joint venture at Isabella and Pearl. In 2008, TXAU completed an additional 7 DDH holes for a total of 1,129 m (3,704 ft) in the Pearl deposit in order to address some issues concerning assays and insufficient quality assurance/quality control measures from prior drilling.
5.3 | Historical Production |
In the late 1970’s, Joe Morris placed a small amount of crushed material onto a small pad with the intention of developing a heap-leach operation, but the venture was abandoned (Diner, 1983). No record of gold production from this heap leach operation is available.
5.4 | Isabella Pearl Mine Production |
Since production commenced at the Isabella Pearl mine in 2019, a total of 2,268,939 tonnes of open pit ore has been mined to produce 40,362 ounces of gold and 38,111 ounces of silver (Table 5-1). In May of 2019, WLMC began selling gold and silver doré from the Isabella Pearl mine.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 22 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 5-1 : Isabella Pearl Mine Production 2019 - 2021
Year | Ore Mined Tonnes | Gold Produced Oz | Silver Produced Oz |
2019 | 934,723 | 10,883 | 9,752 |
2020 | 643,518 | 29,479 | 28,359 |
2021 | 598,345 | 46,459 | 44,553 |
Totals | 2,176,586 | 86,821 | 82,664 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 23 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
6 | Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit |
The following description of geology and mineralization was mainly based on work by Ekrin and Byers (1985) with modifications and minor editing excerpts from Golden (2000), Hamm (2010) and Prenn & Gustin, 2008, 2011 & 2013).
6.1 | Regional Geology |
The Isabella Pearl mine is located in the central portion of the Walker Lane, a major northwest- trending zone on the western border of Nevada characterized by a series of closely spaced dextral strike-slip faults that were active throughout much of the middle to late Cenozoic. It is a complex zone up to 300 km (186 mi) wide and 1,000 km (620 mi) long that lies on the western boundary of the Basin and Range Province.
Volcanic rocks of middle Tertiary age cover much of the property and include intermediate lava flows and ignimbrite ash flow sheets. The volcanic rocks unconformably overlie Mesozoic strata including Triassic and Jurassic sedimentary units and Cretaceous and Jurassic igneous units. Tectonic activity and erosion have left an irregular, dominantly buried surface of Mesozoic rocks. Within the regional Walker Lane tectonic setting, several major fault zones trend through the property and are dominated by various splays and offset branches. The Soda Springs Valley fault zone is a major host of mineralization in the area and particularly along the Pearl fault strand. The combined right-lateral, post-mineral displacement along the regional faults is in excess of 10 km (6 mi).
A regional geologic map is presented in Figure 6-1 showing the location of the Isabella Pearl mine. A regional cross section also demonstrates the rotation of blocks like the Isabella Pearl setting.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 24 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 6-1 : Isabella Pearl Mine Regional Geologic Map
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 25 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
6.2 | Local and Property Geology |
The Isabella Pearl deposit is situated in the central portion of the Walker Lane geologic belt, which is a major structural zone, 90-300 km (60 to 190 mi) wide, that separates the Sierra Nevada and the Great Basin structural provinces, and which extends from the Las Vegas region northwestward, beyond Reno, for a total length of 800 km (500 mi). The Walker Lane zone is documented to be at least as old as 28 Ma (million years), with initial extension in a north to north-northeast direction and characterized by west-northwest to northwest-trending strike-slip faults that are primary controls for mineralization. These Tertiary-age faults are thought to be reactivated older structures present in the basement rocks.
The known pre-Tertiary basement rocks in the area include the Triassic Luning Formation, which is composed of medium to thick-bedded limestones with some dolomite and siliciclastic rocks. This formation was intruded by stocks and dikes of Jurassic or Cretaceous diorite, porphyritic quartz monzonite, and granite. These basement rocks are overlain by a thick sequence of late Oligocene ash flow tuffs that exceeds 1 km (3,300 ft) in thickness and includes minor associated lavas and intrusive rocks. From oldest to youngest, these Oligocene units include: (1) the Lavas of Giroux Valley; (2) the Mickey Pass Tuff, the Singatse Tuff, and the Petrified Spring Tuff, which are members of the Benton Spring Group; and (3) the Blue Sphinx Tuff. These units are overlain by the early to middle Miocene Lavas of Mount Ferguson, and they are locally crosscut by associated rhyolitic intrusions. The volcanic rocks range in age from 16 to 29 Ma. Other precious-metal districts of the central Walker Lane are temporally and spatially related to volcanic rocks of similar ages. See Figure 6-2 for a stratigraphic column of the Isabella Pearl mine area.
Figure 6-3 shows a representative section through the Isabella Pearl deposits, corresponding to Section A-A’ on Figure 6-4. Note that the ore bodies are controlled by faults that have opposing dips. Also highlighted in light blue is the tabular-style Isabella deposit. Figure 6-4 shows a map of the local and property geology.
The most active volcanism occurred 28-24 Ma and included tuff units that appear to be altered by the approximately 19 Ma mineralizing event(s). From youngest to oldest these locally hydrothermally altered units, which consequently are potential host rocks, are listed as follows:
● | Tbx brecciated tuff and lava unit Miocene or Oligocene Blue Sphinx Tuff Petrified Spring Tuff |
● | Singatse Tuff |
● | Mickey Pass Tuff |
● | Lavas of Giroux Valley |
The Lavas of Giroux Valley do not outcrop within the property boundaries.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 26 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 6-2 : Isabella Pearl Mine Stratigraphic Column
Figure 6-3 Cross Section through the Isabella Pearl Mine; view NW.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 27 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 6-4 : Isabella Pearl Mine Geologic Map
6.2.1 | Lithology |
Lithology plays a role in mineral control. Age dating suggests that any unit older than the Lavas of Mount Ferguson are potential host rocks. Altered and/or mineralized volcanic outcrop areas that have been recognized to date, listed from the youngest to the oldest rocks, are as follows:
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 28 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | The Singatse Tuff is present locally throughout the trend, and although it is not known to contain economic gold mineralization, it is commonly hydrothermally altered, particularly in the basal portion, and locally it may have acted as a cap for underlying mineralization. Alteration in this and the younger units described above may represent leakage of mineralization from the more receptive Guild Mine Member beneath. |
● | The Isabella deposit is hosted within moderately to poorly welded tuff in the upper rhyolitic portion, and the Pearl deposit is hosted dominantly within densely welded tuff in the lower, rhyodacite portion of the Guild Mine Member of the Mickey Pass Tuff. |
● | The basal air fall tuff unit of the Guild Mine Member is a potentially favorable host rock. Fragments of carbon and organic trash contained within the unit could react with mineralizing fluids and precipitate precious metals in a manner very similar to the carbon circuit of a cyanide recovery plant. |
● | The Pearl and Civit Cat sulfide mineral resources are hosted in part by the Cretaceous “granite”. |
6.2.2 | Structural Geology |
The Walker Lane zone is documented to be at least as old as 28 Ma (million years). The Walker Lane structures can be summarily described as consisting of numerous northwesterly trending strike-slip and normal faults, along with extensional oblique fractures and other faults that formed between the northwest striking faults, and dominantly pre-mineral detachment and associated listric normal faults. These structures provided both the ground preparation and the hydrothermal conduit systems necessary for economic mineralization.
Several regional and deep penetrating fault zones trend northwest through the area of interest including the Soda Springs fault. An example of the general density and trend of faulting is illustrated in Figure 6.3, which covers the area in the vicinity of the Isabella deposit. Many more faults are present than shown, but at all practical surface map scales individual faults and related fractures and joints are so numerous, and commonly obscured by alteration, that only the principal ones have been mapped. The importance of faults and fault zones for ore localization, particularly at intersections of and at bends along them cannot be over-emphasized.
Geologists who have worked in mineralized areas along the trend have observed the following: both pre-mineral and post-mineral faults are present, which respectively have structurally prepared the host rocks and displaced mineralization; post mineral faults are commonly characterized by unconsolidated breccias rather than by slickensides; tectonic, hydrothermal, and crackle breccias are present locally; and multiple episodes of breaking and healing are documented. At least some mineralization is reported to occur along the flanks of grabens and half-grabens formed by second and third order structures.
6.2.3 | Alteration |
In the mine area, argillized rocks have been described as dominantly an illite-montmorillonite assemblage, with kaolinite generally restricted to narrow bands up to a few yards wide around silicified zones. Weakly argillized rocks are variably bleached and locally contain areas of less altered, propylitized rock. Strongly to intensely argillized rocks are white and very incompetent, weather down readily, and the original rock type is unrecognizable in the field; pyrite is generally abundant, and where oxidized the rocks are yellowish
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 29 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
to greenish in color. Argillized rocks contain no silicification other than single quartz veinlets. Light pink alunite is present locally as replacements in feldspar sites. In some areas, this strong argillic alteration may be underlain by propylitic alteration. There may be a relationship between alteration features and the intrusions of rhyolite dikes and plugs.
At the Isabella deposit, weak to strong argillic alteration is pervasive in the upper, poorly to moderately welded ash flow tuff, while the lower, more densely welded tuff generally appears relatively “fresh” although varying degrees of propylitic alteration are common. In the upper, less welded tuff, narrow, structurally-controlled zones of silica-pyrite, as well as the more pervasive, near-horizontal, blanket-like silica replacement bodies, cut across the tilted host rock and generally grade outward into silica-kaolinite, with local alunite envelopes, and then into pervasive illite-montmorillonite zones.
Calcite, an alteration product of plagioclase, is present locally as pods and veinlets. Near silicified fault zones epidote is present as small granules both in plagioclase phenocrysts and in the groundmass.
Noteworthy is the fact that silicification and argillization features overlying the Isabella deposit are essentially identical to the alteration features present elsewhere along the structural trend.
Alunite is also commonly present in silicified areas, and silicified rocks generally grade outward into argillized and then into propylitically-altered rocks. Silicification is localized by fault and shear zones, and in many areas, silica has replaced large masses of both the volcanic and granitic rocks. Gold and silver are associated with this silicification within the Guild Mine Member of the Mickey Pass Tuff.
Geologic records indicate that, in many or most areas, the quartz-alunite mineral assemblage caps argillic alteration. It has been hypothesized that this assemblage may have resulted from a strong acid leaching stage originating in a vapor-dominated hydrothermal system. These silicified outcrops locally stand in bold relief as knobs and irregular ledges, and silicification can cover hundreds of square yards.
Silicified cap rocks are reddish to purplish in less altered areas and white (no sulfides) in the most intensely altered areas. Other geologic data distinguish two types of silicification that have been described: (1) strong to intense silicification is pervasive, with the rock matrix partially to completely replaced by silica and with the rock texture partially to completely destroyed; iron oxides are common, and alunite and occasional barite may be present, and (2) weak to moderate silicification described as “irregular”, with “case hardened”, goethite-stained rocks that form ledges in which the feldspars are bleached. Other types of silicification may indicate concealed faults.
6.3 | Isabella Pearl Mineralized Zone |
The gold-silver mineralized zones discussed in this report include the Isabella, Pearl, and Civit Cat oxide deposits and the Pearl and Civit Cat sulfide deposits, collectively referred to in this report as the Isabella Pearl deposit. Alteration and mineral assemblages at Isabella Pearl, including widespread argillic alteration and generally abundant alunite, indicate the deposits belong to the high-sulfidation class of epithermal mineral deposits. K-Ar age determinations indicate the mineralization is about 19 Ma, some 7 to 10 million years younger than the age of the host rocks. This early Miocene age conforms to the age of other high-sulfidation epithermal precious-metal deposits in the Walker Lane (e.g., Goldfield and Paradise Peak).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 30 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Silicification generally grades outward into argillization, which then grades into propylitically altered rocks. Silicification is localized by faults and shears, and in many areas, silica has replaced large masses of both the volcanic and granitic rocks. Gold is associated with this silicification, occurring primarily within the Guild Mine Member in the lower part of the Mickey Pass Tuff. This alteration assemblage is also present in the lower, more densely welded tuff characteristic of the Pearl deposit, but it is tightly confined around the mineralized core the deposit.
The Isabella mineralization is moderately argillized to highly siliceous, contains numerous vugs in former feldspar and pumice sites (vuggy-silica textures), and typically lacks any evidence of cross-cutting veinlets. Narrow, structurally controlled zones of silica-pyrite, as well as the more pervasive silica replacement bodies, generally grade outward into silica-kaolinite with local alunite envelopes, which in turn grade into pervasive illite-montmorillonite zones. The iron oxide minerals goethite, jarosite, and hematite are present in the siliceous groundmass. Gold occurs as very small (<10 microns) liberated particles in cavities and along fracture surfaces. Rare secondary minerals include barite, cinnabar, and scorodite. A near-horizontal zone of pervasive argillic and advanced-argillic alteration occurs above the Isabella deposit in the upper, poorly to moderately welded rhyolitic ash-flow tuff of the Guild Mine Member. Within this altered zone, alunite occurs as pseudomorphs after potassium feldspar phenocrysts and as replacements of pumice fragments.
The Pearl deposit is hosted by the lower, densely welded portion of the Guild Mine Member and, to a lesser extent, by Cretaceous granite. Mineralization is largely controlled by the northwest-striking, northeast-dipping contact zone between the granitic basement and the overlying Tertiary volcanic units. This contact may be partially or entirely faulted; this report assumes the contact is marked by the fault. Strong silicification accompanies gold mineralization and is associated with fracture fillings and replacement of the welded tuff. The mineralization is usually associated with strong brecciation. Multiple stages of fracturing and brecciation with associated silicification have been observed in drill core.
Sulfide minerals at Pearl commonly exceed ten percent (by volume) and are composed primarily of crystalline grains and aggregates of pyrite, colloform banded “melnikovite”-type pyrite, and bladed marcasite (or pyrite after marcasite) in dark microcrystalline quartz. This quartz has replaced both the volcanic and intrusive host rocks. In the granite, alteration has resulted in the complete leaching of feldspars and ferromagnesian silicates, and pyrite and marcasite have filled the voids left by the silicate dissolution. Rare sulfide minerals observed in thin and polished sections include arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite, galena, sphalerite, chalcocite, chalcopyrite, polybasite, and pyrargyrite. Other minerals include very minor magnetite, zircon, monazite, and rutile. Native gold has not been observed in the sulfide mineralization.
The oxidation boundary is depressed over and immediately around the Pearl deposit, with oxide mineralization extending to more than 150 m (500 ft) below the surface. Goethite, jarosite, and manganese oxide are common, and barite and chlorargyrite occur rarely in the siliceous groundmass. Gold within the oxide mineralization occurs both as locked and liberated particles, as well as electrum. Particles range in size from 2 to 34 microns, averaging 14 microns. The liberated particles occur as small wire-like grains in cavities, while the locked gold is encapsulated by silica or goethite.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 31 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The Civit Cat mineralization, which is relatively minor and poorly defined by drilling, lies to the northeast of Pearl, and is associated with the northwest-striking, southwest-dipping Civit Cat fault. The control on mineralization by the Pearl and Civit Cat faults, which have similar strikes but opposing dips, results in northwest-trending, roughly lens-shaped zones of mineralization that flank both sides of a graben-like structural trough.
6.3.1 | Fluid Inclusion Data |
Fluid inclusion studies document approximately 12 coarse-grained “vein” quartz bearing outcrops located north and east of the Isabella Pearl mine area (Diner, 1983). Investigation of polished sections yielded 234 inclusions (which were divided into two types: liquid and vapor dominated). The inclusions were measured for homogenization temperatures and indicated a range from 200 to 310 °C with most temperatures in the 220-230 °C range. These temperatures are consistent with boiling conditions.
Salinities were determined and reported in the range of 1-3.05 Wt% NaCl throughout the system with the average at 1.80 Wt% NaCl; this range is consistent with boiling conditions in mineralizing epithermal systems.
The liquid-dominated inclusions contained 2-50% vapor with the majority very low at 5%; however, the range is consistent with boiling if trapped at the same time. A rare occurrence of an abnormally high temperature (> 400 °C) was noted for one sample suggesting trapping of mixed phase fluids, again indicative of boiling. The vapor-dominated inclusions contained >90% vapor and one sample vaporized upon heating. This sample was collected from near the historic Santa Fe open pit mine and corresponded with an excessively high homogenization temperature; in addition, this sample reported the highest salinity at just over 3%.
Diner (1983) noted that fluid inclusion data were on par with deposits of similar style (e.g., Bodie, California 215-245 °C, Tonopah 250-300 °C and Comstock 250 °C) and the temperature range was consistent for this type of solution to exist in equilibrium with gold-quartz-pyrite and could carry enough gold in solution, as auriferous chloride complexes, to account for the hydrothermal gold ore deposit, at the given salinities.
In association with fluid inclusions, Diner (1983) considered pressure effects on the mineralizing system. It was concluded that mineralization could extend to depths of 850 to 320 m; with corresponding hydrostatic pressures of 106-67 bar (max) to 85-32 bar (min), and with corresponding lithostatic pressures of 365-167 bar (max) to 212-80 bar (min). The pressure range likely fluctuated due to sealing and breaching of the conduits thus lowering the pressure below hydrostatic. Diner went further, stating that normal boiling condition pressure at the top of the Mickey Pass Tuff was likely 30-60 bar; and concluded that the presence of the quartz-alunite ‘blanket” at the given pressure and temperature ranges was indicative of an acid leaching vapor phase environment.
6.4 | Deposit Type |
Alteration and mineral assemblages throughout the deposit are represented by widespread argillic alteration, generally abundant alunite, and the presence of minor amounts of base metals, all of which indicate the ore deposits to belong to the high sulfidation (acid sulfate) class of epithermal mineral
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 32 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
deposits. Fluid inclusion data indicates the solutions that deposited the coarse-grained quartz were dilute, with a salinity of 1-2 weight percent NaCl and temperatures ranging 200 to 300° C. Temporal relationships and the thickness of the tuff units suggest that the depth of formation was more than 900m. In Figure 6-5 a red circle highlights the high sulfidation characteristics of the Isabella Pearl ore classification including the Na-rich, moderate temperature, and acid phase minerals. The geometry of the deposit is controlled by two dominant geologic features; favorable stratigraphic horizon, and structural connectivity to mineralizing fluids. In high sulfidation environments the fluids ascend via structural feeders and under acid attack particularly replaces more favorable units; in the case of Isabella Pearl the Guild Mine member of the Mickey pass Tuff was this unit.
A local stratigraphic section shown in Figure 6-6 illustrates a specific model for mineralization at the Isabella deposit and elsewhere along the Walker Lane trend, where numerous fault zones provided the conduits necessary for hydrothermal fluids to transport gold into environments favorable for gold mineralization. The uppermost, Isabella-type deposit occurs in the upper portion of the Guild Mine Member tuff host rock. This deposit type is relatively large and of lower average grade because the tuff is less welded and consequently relatively porous, allowing the mineralizing fluids to spread beneath the overlying Singatse Tuff, which served as a relatively impermeable barrier (only the lower portion of the Singatse Tuff is altered in the vicinity of the Isabella Pearl deposit).
The stratigraphically lower Pearl-type deposit is limited to faults and fractures and is controlled in part by the basement rock contact with the overlying volcanic rocks. The deep sulfide and Pearl-type deposits are relatively high-grade because these environments were the first favorable environments encountered by ascending, mineralized, hydrothermal fluids.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 33 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 6-5 : High Sulfidation Characteristics of the Isabella Pearl Mineralization
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 34 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 6-6 : Idealized Stratigraphic Section Highlighting Mineralization Controls for Isabella Pearl
6.4.1 | Extents and Continuity |
Within the Isabella Pearl mine area, six primary gold deposits have been modeled: Isabella, Pearl, Civit Cat North, Scarlet South (excluding Scarlet North), Silica Knob and Crimson. The approximate pre-mining extents of each are summarized in Table 6-1. Each deposit shows internal geological and grade continuity, with a consistent direction of mineralization. The approximate dimensions of each deposit are based on grade shells constructed at a nominal 0.3 g/t Au (0.009 opst) used to limit grade interpolation in the 3D block model.
Table 6-1 : Approximate Extents of Gold-Silver Deposits in the Isabella Pearl Mine Area
Deposit | Tonnage | Strike Length | Dip Length |
Civit Cat North | 3.4 million tonnes | 290 m | 250 m |
Isabella | 7.1 million tonnes | 570 m | 20 m |
Pearl | 4.0 million tonnes | 400 m | 280 m |
Scarlet South | 0.5 million tonnes | 550 m | 100 m |
Silica Knob | 0.3 million tonnes | 300 m | 100 m |
Crimson | 1.2 million tonnes | 560 m | 70 m |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 35 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
7 | Exploration |
7.1 | Exploration by Previous Operator (TXAU) |
TXAU conducted two DDH drilling programs that were managed by HB Engineering. The first program was designed primarily to provide material for metallurgical testing, as well as to attempt to confirm the historic assay and geological data collected by the Combined Metals-Homestake joint venture. A total of 19 holes totaling 1,187 m (3,894 ft) were drilled in early 2007, including four holes into the Pearl deposit and the remaining holes into the Isabella deposit. Two holes, P-6 and P-16 were lost in bad ground and were re-drilled. P-16 recovered core to 10 m (33 ft), which was split and sampled; no core from P-6 was sampled.
The 2007 drill data were incorporated into the project database, and MDA was contracted to complete a mineral resource estimate, as well as an economic scoping study (Prenn and Gustin, 2008). These studies led to the identification of a number of deficiencies that precluded the classification of any of the resources as Measured. In order to address these deficiencies and lower project risk, TXAU completed the 2008 drill program, which consisted of 7 DDH holes for a total of 1,129 m (3,704 ft) of drilling. Since the Pearl deposit contributes approximately 75% of the total oxide resources at Isabella Pearl, and essentially all of the sulfide resources, the 2008 drilling concentrated on the Pearl deposit.
The 2008 program included an industry standard QA/QC program, down-hole surveys were conducted on all holes, care was taken during drilling and the removal of core from the core barrel in order to maximize sample recoveries, and further specific gravity determinations were obtained from samples of the drill core. Additional QA/QC work was also completed on the 2007 drill samples, and geologic mapping of portions of the Isabella-Pearl resource area was completed.
In addition to the drilling programs, TXAU commissioned McClelland Laboratories, Inc. (McClelland) to complete metallurgical testing on a bulk surface sample and DDH composites in 2007 and 2008. The results of this test work are summarized in Section 13.
7.2 | Exploration by WLMC |
7.2.1 | Surface Exploration |
The Isabella Pearl deposit geology is generally understood, with favorable stratigraphy, structural geology, and alteration as the primary controls on mineralization. The core of the deposit is also relatively well-defined but mining and additional drilling can be expected to increase the current mineral reserves and the confidence level of the mineral resource estimate. Potential exists to extend the mineral reserves by drilling along the periphery of the deposit to the south, northwest, and northeast.
WLMC has also conducted extensive rock-chip sampling and geological mapping adjacent to the current Isabella and Pearl deposits to the northwest of the deposits as well as minor sampling south of the Pearl deposit. A total of 196 rock chip samples were taken by WLMC in 2017 in the Scarlet anomaly
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 36 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
immediately northwest of Isabella and Pearl deposits and analyzed by Inspectorate - Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratory (Bureau Veritas) in Sparks, Nevada. Rock chip samples were analyzed for gold, silver, and a multi-element suite. A total of 67 of the 196 rock chip samples returned greater than 0.30 ppm Au and 22 of the 196 samples returned greater than 1.0 ppm Au with a high of 9.278 ppm Au.
Reconnaissance geological mapping and rock chip sampling has also identified new, surface high-grade gold target areas located along strike to the northwest of the Isabella Pearl mine into the Scarlet area (Figure 7-1), as well as the already defined Civit Cat North deposit to the northeast. Figure 7-1 also highlights exploration targeting near the Isabella Pearl mine at the Scarlet and Civit Cat North area. Here we can see the usefulness of spectral sample analysis as a tool for targeting in conjunction with rock chip sampling, which aided in delimiting local fault strands hosting potential gold mineralization. 3D modeling and interpretation of the data has identified additional targets. Historical drilling was widely spaced with favorable results that were not offset with additional drilling, and WLMC plans to offset these historical drill intercepts as well as test highly anomalous rock chip samples and targets generated in modeling.
Figure 7-1 : Local rock chip sampling and spectral data modeling
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 37 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
7.2.2 | Geophysics |
Geophysical targeting with regional magnetics offers another exploration tool for the Isabella Pearl mineralized trend. Figure 7.2 highlights contoured total magnetic response data. Target blocks identified in conjunction with the tectonic reconstruction are colorized in red. Block B shown in Figure 7.2 is interpreted as the offset, northwestern portion of the Isabella Pearl target (Block A).
The Isabella Pearl land position hosts many exceptional target areas. Based on indications by previous exploration and a good understanding of characteristics defining the Isabella Pearl deposit, further exploration can be targeted at prospects hosted along the same structural corridor and locally the fault strands, within same prospective rock units (i.e., Mickey Pass Tuff). In particular, future exploration targeting should focus on:
● | Silicification and quartz flooded zones along high angle faults, |
● | Silicification and quartz flooded zones with in favorable permeable units of the volcanic stratigraphy; especially where they are in contact with high angle faults, |
● | Silicification and quartz flooding associated with other less permeable volcanic sediments lying between the basement rocks and fed by high angle faults, |
● | Targeting alunite-dickite and other higher temperature clay alteration minerals, |
● | Exploration techniques including spectral analysis in conjunction with detailed field mapping, in combination with regional spectral data, and |
● | Geophysical data review and further geophysical studies regional targeting. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 38 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 7-2 : Schematic image of regional magnetic contour data (after Lockwood et al., 1971)
7.2.3 | Remote Sensing |
The use of spectral data in vectoring to higher temperature alteration can be very useful given the documented alteration footprint. In addition, to local targeting with grid sampling and spectral analysis, regional targeting for gold exploration can search for the products of hydrothermal alteration where mineral-bearing rocks were displaced by strong geothermal systems.
In April 2020, Terra Modelling Services Inc. (TMS) completed data acquisition, processing and analysis of an Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) data set for the Isabella Pearl mine, including the Scarlet area, shown in Figure 7.3. Analysis of the ASTER data included:
● | Granule ID from the raw data; |
● | Band identifiers, both ASTER band and USGS reference; |
● | Band ratios used and spatial resolution charts; |
● | Structural interpretation; |
● | Quartz content map; |
● | Differentiations of argillic, phyllic, propylitic, and silicic alterations; |
● | Characterization of areas for illite, crystalline kaolinite, dickite and possible vegetation anomalies; |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 39 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | All ferric and non-ferric oxides (jarosite, goethite, hematite). |
Anomalous high hydrothermal alteration spectral analysis identified 9 target areas for ground follow-up in the Isabella Pearl mine and Scarlet areas (Figure 7-4). Potential mineral targets are mostly aligned with major NW-trending structures and have spectral and vegetation anomalies.
Previous to the 2020 analysis of ASTER data by TMS, a computer enhanced Landsat image was analyzed by Analytical Imaging and Geophysics (Hamm, 1999). Figure 7.5 highlights enhanced regional spectral data on the Landsat image. The image represents a computer enhanced 2° X 2° Landsat image from an altitude of 708 km with a resolution of 78 km2 per pixel (Gabbs Valley Range, Nevada Landsat TM ratios 5/7, 3/1, ¾ RGB). Six discrete spectral wavelengths of reflected light from visible to mid-infrared, and one band in the thermal infrared was recorded simultaneously. Shades of red indicate vegetation, lakes are purple, valley soils are light blue and evaporative alkali flats appear white. White and light-yellow colors correspond to higher temperature alteration and presence of clays or silica (after Hamm, 1999). Historic mines of the Santa Fe district shown as blue stars. Anomalies corresponding to clays, silica and sulfate minerals produced by hydrothermal alteration are depicted as white to light yellow, and often can be found associated with precious metal occurrences.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 40 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 7-3 : Quartz Content (Upper), and Alunite Content (Lower) for Isabella Pearl, including Scarlet Area
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 41 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 7-4 : Scarlet area Potential Target areas based on ASTER data analysis identified by TMS.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 42 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Source: ENVI by Analytical Imaging and Geophysics, Boulder, Colorado 1997; WRS path 42, Row 33, 7, July 1984 UTM zone 11)
Figure 7-5 : Isabella Pearl Mine (yellow star) and FGC land package on a Landsat image.
7.2.4 | Drilling |
The mineral resources and mineral reserves reported herein were estimated using a drill hole database compiled by WLMC, as described below. The final mine database includes a total of 568 holes drilled by Combined Metals-Homestake, TXAU and WLMC at Isabella Pearl through 2021, including 532 RC, 33 DDH and three metallurgical DDH drill holes. Metallurgical drill holes were submitted in their entirety for metallurgical testing and do not have individual assay results. The Isabella Pearl mine drilling history is summarized in Table 7-1, which includes drill holes shown in Figure 7.6.
Most of the pre-TXAU and WLMC drilling was completed between 1987 and 1990 by the Combined Metals-Homestake joint venture (Golden, 2000). It should be noted that the database used by Sierra Mining reportedly included 178 Combined Metals-Homestake holes (Golden, 2000), three more than the MDA database; holes IC-34, 35, 37, and 175 are possibilities for missing holes in the MDA data based on the drill hole numbering sequence (Prenn & Gustin, 2008, 2011 & 2013).
Topographic surveying of collars was undertaken by registered professional surveyors from Nevada. All plots were delivered as stamped referenced plats along with corresponding digital data files. Verification of field locations were also validated with registered air photographs. The TXAU 2007 - 2013 drill hole collar locations were surveyed by David Rowe of Winnemucca, Nevada. Rowe also surveyed the collar
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 43 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
locations of 100 Combined Metals-Homestake holes that could be accurately located on the ground. The WLMC 2016 - 2018 drill holes were surveyed by Kevin Haskew of Reno, Nevada. The 2019-2021 drill hole collars were surveyed by the Isabella Pearl mine survey department.
Table 7-1 : Drilling History at the Isabella Pearl Mine (1987 - 2021)
Company | Period | RC | DDH (Core) | Total | |||
No. | Meters | No. | Meters | No. | Meters | ||
Combined Metals-Homestake | 1987-1990 | 182 | 19,598.6 | 6 | 513 | 188 | 20,111.6 |
TXAU | 2007-2008 | - | - | 26 | 2,315.7 | 26 | 2,315.7 |
WLMC* | 2016-2021 | 350 | 28,298.9 | 1 | 249.9 | 351 | 28,548.8 |
WLMC Met Holes | 2016-2017 | - | - | 3 | 484.9 | 3 | 484.9 |
Totals | 532 | 44,897.5 | 36 | 3,563.5 | 568 | 51,461.0 | |
*Includes 6 Air Track (AT) drill holes |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 44 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 7-6 : Isabella Pearl Mine Drill Hole Location Map
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 45 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
7.2.4.1 | RC Drilling Procedures |
Logs are available for all historic holes in the sequence IC-38 through IC-178, except IC-54. All historic holes are believed to have been completed by RC drill rigs, with the exception of DDH holes IC-136 through IC-141.
Drilling Services is identified as the drill contractor for 33 of the holes in the sequence from IC-142 through IC-174. A total of 43 logs from holes in this sequence note the drill type as being TH100 or TH100A. Holes IC-142 to IC-156 are noted as being drilled in 1989, while holes IC-158 through IC- 174 were drilled in 1990.
Hackworth is noted as the drill contractor for holes IC-176 through IC-178, the latest Combined Metals-Homestake holes in the database (IC-175 is not in the database). These holes were drilled in 1990 using a TH60 rig.
Drill-bit diameters are identified on 128 of the RC logs, which indicate 5.125, 5.25, 5.5, and 6 inch bit sizes. Most of the Hackworth holes were drilled with 5.5 inch bits, while most Drilling Services holes were drilled with 5.25 inch bits. Both drill contractors used hammer and tri-cone bits
WLMC 2016 - 2021 RC drilling was performed on diurnal shifts by New Frontier Drilling LLC (Frontier) Fallon, Nevada. Drilling equipment consisted of an RC track mounted Foremost MPD drill capable of drilling angle holes to 500 m (1,500 ft). The samples were recovered through the center of the double walled pipe and the sample discharged via a cyclone. Water/fluid was injected into the airflow on an intermitted to continuous basis to assist with recovery of the sample through the wet rotating splitter. Appropriate sample bags were provided by WLMC and they were collected and bagged and tagged under geologist supervision during the drilling. The contractor conducted all operations to industry standard practices.
In 2017, WLMC also utilized New Frontier Drilling to complete a 1,356 m (4,450 ft) RC condemnation drill program to ensure no mineral resources occurred where mine/plant facilities are currently located. The program consisted of 5 RC drill holes drilled to depths of up to 366 m (1,200 ft).
The air track (AT) drilling was completed by Merritt Construction Mina, NV utilizing an Atlas Copco portable blast hole rig modified to 4.5 inches for shallow drilling (less than 30m (99 ft)). The drill rig is supported by compressed air at a rate of 825 cubic feet per minute, with compressed air forced down the center of the rod and hammered materials returned up the outside of the rod. This drilling method was restricted to vertical hole orientation. The drilling method was dry, samples were taken for each 1.5m (5 ft), and the recovered chips were collected in 5-gallon pails and split with a portable riffle splitter. Samples were bagged at the site and transported to company’s secure storage location until submittal to ALS. The AT holes were not surveyed down-hole.
7.2.4.2 | DDH (Core) Drilling Procedures |
Combined Metals-Homestake completed a six-hole DDH drilling program in 1989. No further details concerning this program are available.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 46 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
TXAU conducted a 19-hole DDH drilling program in 2007 and drilled an additional seven DDH holes in 2008. HB Engineering managed the drilling programs for TXAU. Leroy Kay Drilling Co., Inc. of Yerington, Nevada (Kay Drilling) was the drilling contractor for the 2007 program. All recovered core was HQ size (2.5 in).
The drilling contractor for the 2008 program was Sierra Madre Exploration of West Point, California (Sierra Madre). Sierra Madre used a track-mounted Longyear Casa Grande C5S rig, made in Italy specifically for drilling long DDH holes from underground. The rig is capable of drilling HQ core to depths of greater than 600m (2,000ft) and can drill angle holes on very small drill pads, which was important for the 2008 campaign. To help increase recovery in loose, difficult drilling conditions, a Longyear’s HQ3 system was used instead of a standard core barrel. Water pressure was used to pump the core out of the core barrel (as opposed to jarring it out with hammer blows) onto a half-pipe tray, and the core was then boxed in standard wax-coated cardboard boxes.
KB Drilling Company (KB) of Mound House, Nevada provided services for the 2016 metallurgical DDH drilling program. Two sizes of DDH drill core were utilized: a large diameter “PQ” 8.5 cm (3.35 in) for metallurgical testing, and a smaller “HQ” 63.5 mm (2.5 in) for core sample and routine laboratory analyses. Core was pressure removed when possible (in fractured ground) otherwise handled traditionally with rubber mallet percussion to remove. Core was place in wax treated boxes. Depth, rod change, and loss zones were noted on wood blocks in place with the drill core. Core was shipped to a WLMC locked storage in Hawthorne, Nevada twice daily at drilling shift change. After drilling holes were surveyed with the Reflex tool (described in next section) and logged paper copies of the measurements were retained by the drill site geologist. The contractor conducted all operations to industry standard practices.
7.2.4.3 | Down Hole Surveying Procedures |
For the historical drilling the database contains down-hole survey data for the 11 DDH holes (including metallurgical drill holes), 5 RC holes and 6 AT holes as listed in Table 7-1. The remaining drill holes are limited to collar surveys only.
Seven DDH holes drilled by TXAU in 2008 were surveyed by the drillers upon completion of each hole using a Reflex EZ-SHOT tool. The holes tended to steepen by 1 to 2.5 degrees and change azimuth unsystematically up to 5.5 degrees. If the pre-2008 drill holes, which do not have down-hole survey data, deviated at similar magnitudes as the 2008 holes, the lack of surveys would have no material impact on the mineralization model.
The WLMC 2016 DDH program under KB utilized a Reflex EZ-shot camera and surveys were taken at approximately 50 ft intervals as per industry standard. The data was reviewed by the competent geologist and approved for entry into the company database.
The 2017 condemnation RC drilling program utilized the Reflex EZ-Gyro and surveys were taken every 15.2 m (50 ft) as per industry standard and included a QA/QC multi-shot optimization at approximately each 30.5 m (100 ft). This data was reviewed by competent geologist and approved for entry into the company database. No extreme or unusual deviation was noted with the survey results from either campaign.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 47 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
In 2016, WLMC also completed six (6) shallow AT drill holes totaling 82m (269 ft) targeting shallow oxide mineralization in the Isabella Pearl mine area. Holes were completed to maximum depth 30 m (99 ft.). In addition, the WLMC 2017 condemnation RC drilling program sterilized all near-surface ground in the areas tested with drill holes consisting of mainly alluvium or uneconomic mineralization to final drill hole depths.
During 2021, WLMC completed 95 in-fill and step-out RC drill holes to expand mineral resources at the Isabella Pearl mine. The drilling program utilized the New Frontier Drilling RC drill and the same industry accepted down hole Reflex surveying and laboratory analytical methods as previously. The campaign successfully intercepted additional mineralization both along known structures and increased confidence in other infill areas. Results included up to 2.23 g/t Au over 16.76 m including 4.52 g/t Au over 3.05 m in Hole IPRC-257, 1.60 g/t Au over 24.38 m including 3.94 g/t Au over 3.05 m in Hole IPRC-262 and 1.57 g/t Au over 19.81 m including 3.19 g/t Au over 4.57 m in Hole IPRC-302. All of these intercepts were returned from the newly discovered Crimson structure, concealed beneath alluvial cover, in the Scarlet area. Figure 7.7 shows drill holes completed during 2021 and Table 7-2 summarizes significant assay results. All of the information gained has been included in mineral resource and reserve estimates reported herein.
7.2.5 | Material Results and Interpretation |
The TXAU 2008 and WLMC 2016 - 2021 drill information allowed for the refinement in the modeling of the high-grade portions of the Pearl deposit, as well as the oxidized/unoxidized boundary and the contact between Tertiary volcanic and granitic rocks. These refinements are critical to the confidence in the resource estimation at Pearl. Down-hole surveys conducted on the 2008 holes indicated only minor deviations, which alleviated concerns related to the lack of down-hole survey data in the pre-2008 holes. The confirmatory drilling ultimately led to the definition of mineral resources and reserves within the Pearl deposit reported herein.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 48 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 7-7 : Location Map for Drill Holes Completed at Isabella Pearl Mine during 2021
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 49 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 7-2 : Significant Results 2021 Drilling at Isabella Pearl Mine
Hole # | Angle | Target |
| From | To | Interval | Au |
deg |
| Meters | Meters | Meters | g/t | ||
IPRC-251 | -50 | Crimson |
| 42.67 | 45.72 | 3.05 | 0.40 |
| 62.48 | 68.58 | 6.10 | 0.31 | |||
| 117.35 | 137.16 | 19.81 | 0.31 | |||
| 143.26 | 147.83 | 4.57 | 0.35 | |||
IPRC-252 | -45 | Crimson |
| 114.30 | 120.40 | 6.10 | 0.64 |
| 135.64 | 137.16 | 1.52 | 1.01 | |||
| 144.78 | 149.35 | 4.57 | 0.34 | |||
IPRC-253 | -50 | Crimson |
| 96.01 | 99.06 | 3.05 | 0.51 |
| 105.16 | 123.44 | 18.29 | 1.16 | |||
incl. | 114.30 | 115.82 | 1.52 | 2.02 | |||
| 134.11 | 144.78 | 10.67 | 0.40 | |||
IPRC-254 | -60 | Crimson |
| 67.06 | 86.87 | 19.81 | 1.56 |
incl. | 76.20 | 79.25 | 3.05 | 3.19 | |||
IPRC-255 | -60 | Crimson |
| 65.53 | 80.77 | 15.24 | 1.11 |
incl. | 76.20 | 77.72 | 1.52 | 2.07 | |||
IPRC-256 | -60 | Crimson |
| 64.01 | 82.30 | 18.29 | 1.16 |
incl. | 76.20 | 77.72 | 1.52 | 2.02 | |||
IPRC-257 | -50 | Crimson |
| 21.34 | 24.38 | 3.05 | 0.35 |
| 67.06 | 83.82 | 16.76 | 2.23 | |||
incl. | 76.20 | 79.25 | 3.05 | 4.52 | |||
IPRC-258 | -50 | Crimson |
| 132.59 | 138.68 | 6.10 | 0.31 |
IPRC-259 | -60 | Crimson |
| 21.34 | 39.62 | 18.29 | 0.34 |
IPRC-262 | -60 | Crimson |
| 32.00 | 56.39 | 24.38 | 1.60 |
incl. | 35.05 | 38.10 | 3.05 | 3.94 | |||
IPRC-265 | -90 | Silica Knob |
| 35.05 | 54.86 | 19.81 | 0.46 |
IPRC-266 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 27.43 | 32.00 | 4.57 | 0.70 |
incl. | 28.96 | 30.48 | 1.52 | 1.05 | |||
IPRC-267 | -80 | Silica Knob |
| 33.53 | 45.72 | 12.19 | 0.84 |
incl. | 33.53 | 35.05 | 1.52 | 1.41 | |||
incl. | 42.67 | 45.72 | 3.05 | 1.49 | |||
IPRC-268 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 36.58 | 57.91 | 21.34 | 0.58 |
IPRC-270 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 28.96 | 47.24 | 18.29 | 0.50 |
incl. | 38.10 | 39.62 | 1.52 | 1.01 | |||
IPRC-271 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 32.00 | 54.86 | 22.86 | 0.62 |
incl. | 44.20 | 45.72 | 1.52 | 1.09 | |||
incl. | 51.82 | 54.86 | 3.05 | 1.31 | |||
IPRC-273 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 38.10 | 44.20 | 6.10 | 0.52 |
|
| 57.91 | 60.96 | 3.05 | 0.53 | ||
IPRC-275 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 36.58 | 44.20 | 7.62 | 0.33 |
| 51.82 | 57.91 | 6.10 | 0.36 | |||
IPRC-276 | -60 | Silica Knob |
| 0.00 | 25.91 | 25.91 | 0.46 |
incl. | 16.76 | 19.81 | 3.05 | 1.12 | |||
IPRC-277 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 0.00 | 15.24 | 15.24 | 0.50 |
IPRC-278 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 30.48 | 36.58 | 6.10 | 0.35 |
IPRC-279 | -80 | Silica Knob |
| 47.24 | 50.29 | 3.05 | 0.60 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 50 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
IPRC-280 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 59.44 | 60.96 | 1.52 | 0.39 |
IPRC-283 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 6.10 | 9.14 | 3.05 | 0.33 |
| 19.81 | 22.86 | 3.05 | 0.33 | |||
| 38.10 | 45.72 | 7.62 | 0.94 | |||
incl. | 38.10 | 39.62 | 1.52 | 2.92 | |||
IPRC-284 | -70 | Silica Knob |
| 6.10 | 7.62 | 1.52 | 0.49 |
| 13.72 | 28.96 | 15.24 | 0.98 | |||
incl. | 21.34 | 27.43 | 6.10 | 1.67 | |||
IPRC-286 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 13.72 | 36.58 | 22.86 | 0.54 |
incl. | 16.76 | 19.81 | 3.05 | 1.10 | |||
| 51.82 | 57.91 | 6.10 | 0.42 | |||
IPRC-287 | -75 | Silica Knob |
| 36.58 | 48.77 | 12.19 | 0.54 |
IPRC-288 | -65 | Silica Knob |
| 45.72 | 48.77 | 3.05 | 0.35 |
IPRC-289 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 4.57 | 7.62 | 3.05 | 1.78 |
incl. | 4.57 | 6.10 | 1.52 | 3.24 | |||
| 35.05 | 42.67 | 7.62 | 0.43 | |||
| 48.77 | 50.29 | 1.52 | 0.40 | |||
| 51.82 | 57.91 | 6.10 | 0.42 | |||
IPRC-291 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 30.48 | 32.00 | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| 35.05 | 45.72 | 10.67 | 0.47 | |||
IPRC-292 | -50 | Silica Knob |
| 36.58 | 39.62 | 3.05 | 0.59 |
| 59.44 | 62.48 | 3.05 | 0.34 | |||
IPRC-293 | -90 | Silica Knob |
| 32.00 | 35.05 | 3.05 | 0.39 |
| 44.20 | 48.77 | 4.57 | 0.35 | |||
IPRC-297 | -76 | Crimson |
| 118.87 | 121.92 | 3.05 | 0.62 |
IPRC-299 | -90 | Crimson |
| 35.05 | 44.19 | 9.14 | 0.73 |
incl. | 38.1 | 41.15 | 3.05 | 1.28 | |||
IPRC-300 | -60 | Crimson |
| 21.34 | 28.96 | 7.62 | 0.58 |
| 68.58 | 79.25 | 10.67 | 0.81 | |||
incl. | 74.68 | 77.73 | 3.05 | 1.45 | |||
IPRC-301 | -75 | Crimson |
| 25.91 | 33.53 | 7.62 | 0.81 |
incl. | 27.43 | 28.95 | 1.52 | 2.78 | |||
| 38.1 | 41.15 | 3.05 | 0.42 | |||
| 76.2 | 80.77 | 4.57 | 0.87 | |||
incl. | 77.72 | 79.24 | 1.52 | 1.44 | |||
| 85.34 | 91.44 | 6.1 | 1.34 | |||
incl. | 86.87 | 89.92 | 3.05 | 1.68 | |||
IPRC-302 | -60 | Crimson |
| 62.48 | 82.29 | 19.81 | 1.57 |
incl. | 73.15 | 77.72 | 4.57 | 3.19 | |||
IPRC-306 | -65 | Crimson |
| 47.24 | 51.81 | 4.57 | 0.77 |
incl. | 48.77 | 50.29 | 1.52 | 1.06 | |||
IPRC-309 | -75 | Crimson |
| 22.86 | 28.96 | 6.1 | 0.66 |
incl. | 24.38 | 25.9 | 1.52 | 1.26 | |||
IPRC-311 | -60 | Crimson |
| 36.58 | 39.63 | 3.05 | 0.54 |
IPRC-313 | -45 | Crimson |
| 51.82 | 54.86 | 3.05 | 1.27 |
incl. | 51.82 | 53.34 | 1.52 | 1.99 | |||
| 71.63 | 76.20 | 4.57 | 1.35 | |||
incl. | 73.15 | 74.68 | 1.52 | 2.00 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 51 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
IPRC-314 | -75 | Crimson |
| 42.67 | 45.72 | 3.05 | 0.36 |
IPRC-315 | -50 | Crimson |
| 41.15 | 45.72 | 4.57 | 0.35 |
IPRC-316 | -75 | Crimson |
| 60.96 | 91.44 | 30.48 | 0.57 |
incl. | 62.48 | 65.53 | 3.05 | 1.23 | |||
| 111.25 | 135.64 | 24.38 | 0.75 | |||
incl. | 112.78 | 114.30 | 1.52 | 1.05 | |||
incl. | 117.35 | 120.40 | 3.05 | 1.26 | |||
IPRC-317 | -50 | Crimson |
| 47.24 | 59.44 | 12.19 | 0.43 |
IPRC-318 | -75 | Crimson |
| 53.34 | 67.06 | 13.72 | 0.45 |
incl. | 64.01 | 65.53 | 1.52 | 1.26 | |||
| 99.06 | 102.11 | 3.05 | 0.42 | |||
IPRC-320 | -75 | Crimson |
| 67.06 | 68.58 | 1.52 | 0.52 |
| 71.63 | 74.68 | 3.05 | 0.54 | |||
| 80.77 | 92.96 | 12.19 | 0.51 | |||
incl. | 89.92 | 91.44 | 1.52 | 1.09 | |||
| 99.06 | 102.11 | 3.05 | 0.43 | |||
IPRC-322 | -75 | Crimson |
| 59.44 | 60.96 | 1.52 | 0.49 |
| 70.10 | 73.15 | 3.05 | 0.39 | |||
| 89.92 | 92.96 | 3.05 | 0.52 | |||
IPRC-323 | -50 | Crimson |
| 56.39 | 62.48 | 6.10 | 0.38 |
IPRC-328 | -90 | Isabella West |
| 32.00 | 38.10 | 6.10 | 0.31 |
IPRC-330 | -90 | Isabella West |
| 18.29 | 21.34 | 3.05 | 0.50 |
IPRC-331 | -90 | Isabella West |
| 21.34 | 22.86 | 1.52 | 0.58 |
IPRC-333 | -60 | Civit Cat |
| 56.39 | 59.44 | 3.05 | 1.28 |
IPRC-335 | -64 | Civit Cat |
| 65.53 | 67.06 | 1.52 | 1.99 |
IPRC-336 | -45 | Civit Cat |
| 54.86 | 59.44 | 4.57 | 0.58 |
incl. | 56.39 | 57.91 | 1.52 | 1.01 | |||
| 96.01 | 97.53 | 1.52 | 0.51 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 52 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
8 | Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security |
8.1 | Historic Security Measures and Sample Preparation |
Historic security measures and sample preparation were reported by MDA (Prenn & Gustin, 2013). This includes descriptions excerpted from Sierra Mining (Golden, 2000) for drilling programs conducted at Isabella Pearl before TXAU took control of the project. For more details, the reader is referred to earlier reports on mineral resources and reserves and the feasibility study for the Isabella Pearl mine (Brown et al., 2018, 2021).
8.2 | WLMC (2016 to Present) |
8.2.1 | Security Measures |
Sample security procedures for WLMC sample materials were established according to industry standards and included (from generation of sample at the site) secured sample transport to a local locked storage facility for holding and/or directly shipped via secured transport to the laboratory for analysis. Samples were shipped by cargo truck in lots loaded into bins with top closures, enclosed trailer, or stacked and covered and secured to the bed of transport truck (in the case of whole DDH drill hole boxes). Chain of custody forms accompanied the shipments to the reception at the assigned laboratory. No breaches of the security were reported.
8.2.2 | Sample Preparation and Analysis |
For the WLMC 2016 drilling program, continuous sampling was done on 1.52 m (5 ft) intervals, contingent on drilling conditions. All assay samples were processed at ALS Laboratories in Reno, NV, with additional work carried out at ALS in Vancouver, BC, Canada. WLMC has no business relationship with ALS beyond being a customer for analytical services. ALS is an accredited ISO/IEC 17025 facility.
For the WLMC 2017 - 2021 drilling programs, continuous sampling was again done on 1.52 m (5 ft) intervals, contingent on drilling conditions. All assay samples during the 2017 – 2021 drilling programs were processed either at ALS or Bureau Veritas. WLMC has no business relationship with Bureau Veritas beyond being a customer for analytical services. Bureau Veritas is an accredited ISO/IEC 17025 facility.
The umpire laboratory used for check assaying of ALS analyses is Bureau Veritas and vice versa.
All assay samples were analyzed using a 30 g FA with an AAS finish for gold (ALS code AU-AA23; Bureau Veritas code FA430). This technique has a lower detection limit of 0.005 ppm and an upper detection limit of 10.00 ppm. Samples with greater than 10.00 ppm Au were re-analyzed using a 30 g FA with a gravimetric finish (ALS code Au-GRA21; Bureau Veritas code FA530).
All assay samples were also analyzed using a 0.5 g sample with aqua regia for silver (ALS code Ag-AA45; Bureau Veritas code AQ-400). This technique has a lower detection limit of 0.1 ppm for silver and an upper detection limit of 200 ppm for silver.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 53 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
8.2.3 | Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures |
All Standard Reference Materials (SRM) and blanks used for the QA/QC program were obtained from Shea Clark Smith / MEG, Inc., Reno, Nevada. The variation from the SRM mean value defines the QA/QC variance and is used to determine acceptability of the standard sample assay. Approximately 60 g of sample material was submitted per QA/QC sample. Blank material was sourced as “Lava Rock” (pumice) from Oxborrow Landscaping, Sparks, Nevada.
The 2020 through 2021 WLMC drilling program consisted of 180 RC drill holes. All SRM samples from Shea Clark Smith / MEG, Inc. are listed in Table 8-1.
Table 8-1 : WLMC 2020-2021 Standard Reference Materials
Standard | Au ppm | Au SD |
MEG-Au.12.32 | 0.62 | 0.017 |
MEG-Au.17.01 | 0.38 | 0.015 |
MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.41 | 0.014 |
MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.10 | 0.062 |
MEG-Au.17.22 | 0.72 | 0.021 |
MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.663 | 0.057 |
For the SRM, a failure was defined as an assay result outside 2 times the SRM standard deviation. For the 520 SRM samples submitted a total of 25 failures were noted, a failure rate of 5% (Table 8-2). More than one half of all failures were reported for MEG-Au.17.01 and no other failures were reported in those drill holes. The QP’s believe that the quality statistics for Au.17.01 are inadequate, and it is recommended that the use of this SRM sample be discontinued. Performance of the remaining samples was acceptable (Figure 8-1).
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 54 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 8-2 : 2020 through 2021 SRM Failures
SAMPLE ID | SRM | DHID | LAB | Au (g/t) | FAILURE |
3098680 | MEG-Au.12.32 | IPRC-260 | Inspectorate | 0.517 | LOW |
3099840 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-155 | Inspectorate | 0.327 | LOW |
3100360 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-164 | Inspectorate | 0.327 | LOW |
3100400 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-165 | Inspectorate | 0.278 | LOW |
3100540 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-167 | Inspectorate | 0.312 | LOW |
3100780 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-169 | Inspectorate | 0.433 | HIGH |
3101360 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-181 | Inspectorate | 0.329 | LOW |
3101820 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-196 | Inspectorate | 0.329 | LOW |
3102040 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-200 | Inspectorate | 0.460 | HIGH |
3102360 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-204 | Inspectorate | 0.458 | HIGH |
3103300 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-227 | Inspectorate | 1.116 | HIGH |
3103320 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-227 | Inspectorate | 0.426 | HIGH |
3104060 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-238 | Inspectorate | 0.448 | HIGH |
3104660 | MEG-Au.17.01 | IPRC-249 | Inspectorate | 0.429 | HIGH |
291000 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-326 | ALS | 0.482 | HIGH |
3105000 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-253 | Inspectorate | 0.317 | LOW |
3106040 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-269 | Inspectorate | 0.339 | LOW |
3106220 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-272 | Inspectorate | 0.362 | LOW |
3106320 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-275 | Inspectorate | 0.339 | LOW |
3106340 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-275 | Inspectorate | 0.351 | LOW |
3107460 | MEG-Au.17.08 | IPRC-313 | ALS | 0.462 | HIGH |
3103280 | MEG-Au.17.21 | IPRC-227 | Inspectorate | 0.347 | LOW |
3107520 | MEG-Au.17.21 | IPRC-314 | ALS | 0.836 | LOW |
291260 | MEG-Au.17.22 | IPRC-333 | ALS | 1.125 | HIGH |
3105640 | MEG-Au.19.05 | IPRC-258 | Inspectorate | 1.000 | HIGH |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 55 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 8-1 : 2020 - 2021 SRM Performance
For the blank material a failure was defined as an assay that exceeded five times the detection limit of 0.005 ppm (Figure 8.2). Of the 530 blanks submitted, a total of seven failures were received (Table 8-3). A check on the corresponding adjacent SRM sample results for these intervals indicated no issues associated with the individual assays. There was insufficient sample material remaining for re-assaying.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 56 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 8-2 : 2020 - 2021 Blank Material Performance
Table 8-3 : 2020 – 2021 Blank Material Failures
Sample Number | Hole ID | Au (g/t) |
3101541 | IPRC-186 | 0.031 |
3104501 | IPRC-245 | 0.027 |
3106841 | IPRC-285 | 0.167 |
310681 | IPRC-302 | 0.031 |
310821 | IPRC-303 | 0.033 |
290181 | IPRC-316 | 0.038 |
291181 | IPRC-331 | 0.036 |
8.3 | Check Assays |
8.3.1 | Field Duplicates |
For the 2020 - 2021 drilling campaign, a total of 950 field duplicates were taken and submitted for assay at the same laboratory as the primary sample. There is a strong correlation between the primary and secondary assays (Figs. 8.3 & 8.4)
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 57 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 8-3 : Au Field Duplicate Control Plot for 2020 - 2021
Figure 8-4 : Au Min Max Field Duplicate Control Plot for 2020 - 2021
For the 2020 - 2021 drilling campaign, a total of 1,109 coarse rejects from samples that assayed above 0.20 ppm were submitted for cyanide leach assay. Cyanide leach assay results from samples within the oxide zone demonstrated an average recovery of 93% percent compared to the corresponding fire assay results. Cyanide leach assay results from samples within the sulfide zone demonstrated an average recovery of 8% percent compared to the corresponding fire assay results (Figure 8-5).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 58 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 8-5 : Cyanide Leach vs Fire Assay Comparison Plot
8.3.2 | 2021 Bureau Veritas vs ALS Gold Assay Comparison |
A total of 60 pulp samples for the Crimson 2021 RC drilling, originally assayed for gold by Bureau Veritas, were re-submitted to ALS for check assay. The ALS check assays were nearly identical to the original Bureau Veritas assays (Figure 8-6).
Figure 8-6 : Bureau Veritas vs ALS Gold Assay Comparison Plot
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 59 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
8.4 | Opinion of Adequacy |
Gustavson considers that the 2020 - 2021 drilling programs and the historical drilling information as reported by MDA (Prenn & Gustin, 2013), meet industry standards and have been reviewed and confirmed in sufficient detail to permit inclusion of the information in the Isabella Pearl mineral resource and reserve database.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 60 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
9 | Data Verification |
Gustavson has used information and technical documents supplied by WLMC and prepared by MDA for the Data Verification sections with regards to the historical drilling programs at Isabella Pearl. For more details, the reader is referred to earlier reports on mineral resources and reserves and the feasibility study for the Isabella Pearl mine (Brown et al., 2018, 2021). During the site visit, Gustavson reviewed sufficient files and drill cores and cuttings to confirm the previous work.
9.1 | Opinion on Data Adequacy |
Investigations of all aspects of current and historical data quality indicates that the quality of the information is suitable for mineral reserve estimation.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 61 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
10 | Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing |
10.1 | Metallurgical Overview |
This section provides a description of Isabella Pearl mineralization and metallurgical characterization of the deposit. There have been nine individual test work programs by various operators. The correct identification of metallurgical properties of this material (the geo-metallurgical model) is key to project success.
The results of the cyanide leach test work demonstrate the straightforward and consistent nature of the Isabella Pearl metallurgy.
● | The economic minerals of interest are gold and to a minor degree silver. |
● | The results are not dependent on deposit lithology or zoning; The deposit is being mined only above the water table and so refractory sulfide material below the water table is not an issue. |
● | A single simple cyanidation process can be used to recover gold and to a lesser degree silver. |
● | Fast leaching kinetics. |
● | Economics improve by two-stage crushing of plus 1-gram gold to ½ inch. Further test work required to develop particle size gold recovery relationship. |
10.2 | Mineralogy and Metallurgical Ore Types |
The mineral resources of the mine include the Crimson, Scarlet North and South, Silica Knob, Civit Cat North, Isabella, and Pearl oxide deposits, collectively referred to as the Isabella Pearl deposits. The origin of all these deposits is similar, widespread argillic alteration and generally abundant alunite indicate the deposits are high-sulfidation epithermal mineral deposits. K-Ar age determinations demonstrate that the mineralization is about 19 Ma. Oxide mineralization at Isabella Pearl extends over 150 m (492 ft) below the surface and it should be noted that only oxidized ore is included in economics of the mine plan.
The gold-silver mineralization is closely associated with silicification, which generally grades outward into argillization, which then into propylitically altered rocks. Silicification is localized by faults and shears, and in many areas, silica has replaced large masses of both the volcanic and granitic rocks. Gold occurs as very small (<10 microns) liberated particles in cavities and along fracture surfaces. Jarosite, goethite, and hematite are present in the siliceous groundmass.
In the Isabella deposit, gold in mineral resources occur as very small (<10 microns) liberated particles in cavities and along fracture surfaces and iron oxide minerals jarosite, limonite, and goethite.
In the Pearl deposit, mineralization is very siliceous, and similar in mineralization to the Isabella material. The silver/gold ratio is higher than Isabella. The gold is contained both as locked and free particles, as native and electrum in an average size of 14 micron. The mineralization is associated with goethite, limonite, jarosite and psilomelane (manganese). Sulfide mineralization occurs beneath the Pearl oxide and mixed mineral resources. The underlying sulfide material contains pyrite, pyrrhotite, galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and silver as polybasite and pyrargyrite.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 62 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Natural weathering and fracture-controlled oxidation of sulfide mineralization causes formation of oxide ore (with low sulfide mineral). Gold is present as free gold, residing in iron oxide minerals or quartz, and adsorbed on clay minerals. Metallurgical test work has determined that gold is amenable to cyanidation and that the oxidized portion of these mineral deposits are metallurgically the same and yield similar metal recovery results when processed.
10.3 | Previous Metallurgical Test Work Programs |
The Isabella Pearl mine has been subjected to nine separate programs of modern metallurgical test work, the most relevant being the Combined Metals-Homestake joint venture undertaken in 1990, and TXAU in 2009. These two programs are considered of particular interest as the work was performed on drill hole samples and tested for cyanide leachability. There were many other programs where the work focused principally on alternative recovery methods such as flotation. Nonetheless, all cyanide leachability data from all test programs along with that completed by WLMC during 2017 was considered in the conclusions presented herein. A breakdown of the test work, including a study commissioned by WLMC in 2017, are summarized in Table 10-1 below:
Table 10-1 : Summary Metallurgical Test Work Completed on Isabella Pearl Deposit
| Test Program | |||
Report Date | Laboratory | Bottle | Column | Other Tests |
16-May-83 | Kappes Cassiday & Associates | 6 | 0 | 100M to 1/2 inch cyanidation |
15-May-89 | Dawson Metallurgical Laboratories | 6 | 0 | 100M to 1/4 inch cyanidation |
8-Dec-89 | Dawson Metallurgical Laboratories | 38 | 0 | Agitated leach and flotation test work, 21 oxide and 8 sulfide core samples |
10-Jan-90 | McClelland Laboratories | 2 | 4 | Mechanically agitated leach and Vat leach test work. Column leach at 4 inch crush size |
1-Feb-90 | Cosatech | 0 | 0 | Bioleach test work |
20-Jan-92 | Hazen Research | 0 | 0 | Agitated leach on 10M sulfide ore |
8-Oct-97 | Kappes Cassiday & Associates | 0 | 0 | Flotation test work on 4 sulfide samples |
29-Jun-09 | McClelland Laboratories | 17 | 2 | ADR & heap drain down test work |
8-Feb-17 | Kappes Cassiday & Associates | 8 | 4 | Head grade and screen analysis, QXRD clay identification, shake, bottle and column leach on 1/2” crush. |
For details of previous metallurgical test work programs, the reader is referred to earlier reports on mineral resources and reserves and the feasibility study for the Isabella Pearl mine (Brown et al., 2018, 2021). The most relevant results of these programs were those completed by Combined Metals-Homestake joint-venture and TXAU, both of which tested for the application of Heap Leach and the ADR process to Isabella Pearl mineral resources. The TXAU metallurgical program was completed on DDH and
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 63 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
a bulk surface sample. A complete description of this test work can be found in the report by MDA (Prenn and Gustin, 2013). The combined results of all the bottle roll tests and column tests completed, it can be concluded that:
● | There is very good repeatability between samples of any given particle size. |
● | Gold recovery for the finer size (200 mesh) was between 86% and 95% except for one sample which had 2.7% contained sulfide. |
● | At coarser particle size (>10 mm) gold recovery ranged from 64% to 89%. |
● | Column leach tests performed on P100 5/8 inch showed high gold recovery. |
10.4 | WLMC Metallurgical Ore Characterization Test Work Programs |
The basis of the latest WLMC metallurgical test program undertaken by KCA in February 2017 (KCA, 2017) was the clear definition of the metallurgical characteristics of the remaining ore reserves at Isabella Pearl. There were two main objectives:
1. | Confirm previous cyanide leach test work results and viability of Heap Leach, Carbon Adsorption/desorption, and Electrowinning gold recovery process to the Oxide mineral resources. |
2. | Establish that the high-grade core of the Pearl deposit would indeed yield previously determined, gold recovery levels. |
The program consisted of a PQ size DDH program consisting of 4 holes, in October and November of 2016, totaling 735 meters. Four samples for metallurgical testing were taken from 3 of these holes: IPDD-001 (2 sample intervals), IPDD-003 (1 sample interval) and IPDD-004 (1 sample interval). The metallurgical samples were sent to the KCA metallurgical testing facility in Reno. The main purpose of the test work program was to confirm that the high-grade core zone of the Pearl deposit indicates economic gold recovery as demonstrated in earlier work by others. Two holes intercepted the Pearl deposit, and one was drilled in the Isabella deposit. Figures 10.1 and 10.2 present the plan and section of the DDH holes completed by WLMC in late 2016 (Note: Hole IPDD-002 was a twin hole of IPDD-001 drilled for geology and assay information). Table 10-2 below presents the results the gold and silver values of the composites used in the metallurgical test program.
A total of 61 boxes of uncut DDH core representing 1,439 kilograms of material was delivered to KCA laboratories in Reno for sample preparation and testing. The work completed consisted of head analysis (including, whole rock and QXRD), screen analysis by size fraction, comminution, bottle roll, agglomeration, and column leach testing.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 64 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 10-1 : Drill Hole Locations for 2017 WLMC Metallurgical Samples
Figure 10-2 : Section of Sample Locations for WLMC Test Program in Relation to Ore Zone
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 65 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 10-2 : Summary of Isabella Pearl Mine Core Composites Assays, KCA 2017 Program
KCA | Description | Deposit | Assay | Assay | Avg. |
76584 B | IPDD-001, 240.5’ to 320.5’ | Pearl | 0.0274 | 0.024 | 0.0257 |
76585 B | IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ | Pearl | 1.2651 | 1.248 | 1.2566 |
76586 B | IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | Pearl | 9.2743 | 9.3257 | 9.3 |
76587 B | IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’ | Isabella | 0.744 | 0.7509 | 0.7474 |
KCA | Description | Deposit | Assay | Assay | Avg. |
76584 B | IPDD-001, 240.5’ to 320.5’ | Pearl | 0.411 | 0.411 | 0.411 |
76585 B | IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ | Pearl | 2.811 | 3.017 | 2.914 |
76586 B | IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | Pearl | 58.8 | 59.211 | 59.006 |
76587 B | IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’ | Isabella | 3.189 | 3.394 | 3.291 |
Notes:
1. | The detection limit for silver with FAAS finish is 0.006 opst. |
2. | Note - For the purpose of calculation a value of 1/2 the detection limit is utilized for assays less than the detection limit. |
10.4.1 | Results of WLMC Metallurgical Test Drill Hole Samples |
10.4.1.1 | Head Screen Analysis |
Head screen analysis was carried out on portions of each of the four sample composites at the as received crush sizes. The objective of the head screen analysis was to determine assay grade values from select crush size fractions.
A summary of the head screen analyses is presented in Table 10-3. The head screen analyses detail is presented in Table 10-4 and shown graphically in Figure 10-3.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 66 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 10-3 Summary of Head Screen Analyses
Description | Calc p80 | Weighted | Weighted | % | % | % |
IPDD-001, 240.5’ to 320.5’ | 0.170 | 0.021 | 0.343 | 62.6% | 19.2% | 15.9% |
IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ | 0.419 | 1.258 | 3.291 | 40.4% | 18.6% | 15.8% |
IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | 0.657 | 8.414 | 53.383 | 38.3% | 23.7% | 21.4% |
IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’ | 0.489 | 0.617 | 3.600 | 22.2% | 6.7% | 5.2% |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 67 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 10-4 : Detailed Results of Head Screen Analysis
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 68 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 10-3 : Head Screen Analysis Showing Cumulative Weight Percent Passing Crush Size (in inches)
In summary, the head screen analysis on the four samples exhibit similar distribution curves. The highest-grade sample IPDD-003 contained the most gold in the finest fraction as compared to the others.
Head analyses for mercury were also conducted utilizing cold vapor/atomic absorption methods. Total copper analyses were conducted utilizing inductively coupled argon plasma-optical emission spectrophotometer (ICAP-OES) as well as by fire assay – atomic adsorption (FA-AA) methods.
The results of the mercury and copper analyses are presented Figure 10-5.
Table 10-5 : Summary of Mercury and Copper in Sample, KCA 2017 Program
Description | Total | Total | Cyanide | Cyanide |
IPDD-001, 240.5’ to 320.5’ | 0.04 | 9 | 1.04 | 12% |
IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ | 0.07 | 10 | 4.58 | 46% |
IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | 0.04 | 21 | 7.46 | 36% |
IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’ | 0.05 | 16 | 3.50 | 22% |
Head analyses for carbon and sulfur were also conducted utilizing a LECO CS 230 unit. In addition to total carbon and sulfur analyses, speciation for organic and inorganic carbon and speciation for sulfide and sulfate sulfur, were conducted. The results of the carbon and sulfur analyses are presented in Figure 10-4.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 69 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 10-6 : Summary of Carbon and Sulfur Content, KCA 2017 Program
Description | Total | Organic | Inorganic | Total | Sulfide | Sulfate |
IPDD-001, 240.5’ to 320.5’ | 0.02 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.06 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ | 0.02 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 3 | 2.47 | 0.53 |
IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 2.45 | 0.83 | 1.62 |
IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’ | 0.02 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
10.4.1.2 | Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests |
Table 10-7 and Table 10-8 present the gold and silver recovery results of the four 96-hour bottle roll tests completed on 1,000-gram samples that were pulverized to a p80 size of 200 mesh Tyler. Figure 10-4 and Figure 10-5 show the graphical results of gold and silver extraction during the leach period for the metallurgical test samples.
In all samples tested leach kinetics were rapid, samples IPDD-003 and IPDD-004 achieved plus 93% of the total metal recovery in 2 hours. Sample IPDD-001 #1 had a low gold head grade of, 0.025 g/t Au and is therefore classified as waste. Sample IPDD-001 #2 contained 2.47% sulfides, its gold recovery did not surpass 62%.
Table 10-7 : Summary Direct Agitated Cyanidation (Bottle Roll) Gold Test Results, KCA 2017 Program
Table 10-8 Summary Direct Agitated Cyanidation (Bottle Roll) Silver Test Results, KCA 2017 Program
| Bottle Roll Test Results Gold | |||||||||||
Description | Zone | Type | Initial | Head | Calculated | Extracted | Avg. | Au | Leach | Final | Consumption | Addition |
IPDD-001, 240.5’ to 320.5’ | Pearl | Pulverized | 6.6 | 0.373 | 0.280 | 0.103 | 0.187 | 36% | 96 | 11 | 0.28 | 5.50 |
IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ | Pearl | Pulverized | 4 | 2.644 | 2.768 | 1.871 | 0.902 | 67% | 96 | 10 | 3.95 | 15.00 |
IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | Pearl | Pulverized | 5.2 | 53.53 | 54.244 | 28.466 | 25.785 | 52% | 96 | 11 | 1.48 | 5.50 |
IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’ | Isabella | Pulverized | 6.5 | 2.986 | 3.141 | 1.951 | 1.182 | 62% | 96 | 11 | 0.53 | 3.00 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 70 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 10-4 : Bottle Roll Tests Showing % Gold Extraction During Leach Period
Figure 10-5 : Bottle Roll Tests Showing % Silver Extraction during Leach Period
10.4.1.3 | Agglomeration Test Work |
Preliminary agglomeration test work was conducted on portions of the crushed material. For the test work, the material was agglomerated with various additions of lime or cement. In the preliminary
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 71 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
agglomeration testing, the agglomerated material was placed in a column with no compressive load and then tested for permeability. The purpose of the percolation tests was to examine the permeability of the material under various cement agglomeration levels. The percolation tests were conducted in small (3 inch inside diameter) columns at a range of cement levels with no compressive load applied. Two (2) tests (KCA Test Nos. 77513 F and 77513 J) failed the parameters utilized by KCA due to excessive pellet breakdown. All other tests passed the KCA parameters. However, it should be noted that the IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’ sample (KCA Sample No. 76585 B) showed overall low pH values. Once the agglomeration test work was complete, it was decided that the IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ material should be agglomerated with cement (KCA Test No. 77517). However, a second column was run with the same material without cement agglomeration (KCA Test No. 77565). The flow rates and percent (%) slump observed in the non- agglomerated column were similar to the agglomerated column. A comparison of the drain down values and % slumps of the column leach tests on IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ material is presented in Table 10-9.
Table 10-9 : Bureau Veritas vs ALS Gold Assay Comparison Plot
KCA | KCA | Description | 96hour Drain | Slump |
76586 B | 77517 | IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | 10.9 | 0.3% |
76586 B | 77565 | IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0’ | 9.4 | 0.4% |
10.4.1.4 | Column Leach Test Work |
The crushed material split out for column test work was blended with lime or agglomerated with cement as necessary and then loaded into a 4-inch diameter plastic column. Alkaline cyanide solution was continuously distributed onto the material through Tygon tubing. The flow rate of solution dripping onto the material was controlled with a peristaltic pump to 0.004 to 0.005 gallons per minute per square foot of column surface area.
After each cycle the solution was passed through activated carbon over a period of 24 hours to extract the gold and silver in solution. After passing through the bottle of activated carbon, the solution was re-assayed for pH, NaCN, Au and Ag. Sodium cyanide was then added, if necessary, to maintain the solution at “target” levels. The leach solution was then recycled to the material for another 24-hour leach period. Two (2) batches of leach solution were used so that while one batch was applied to each column, the other was run through carbon.
Three (3) column leach tests were conducted utilizing material crushed to 100% passing ⅝ inches (IPDD-001, 320.5’ to 469.5’, IPDD-003, 219.5’ to 422.0 and IPDD-004, 0.0’ to 211.0’). During testing, the material was leached for 46 days with a sodium cyanide solution. Additionally, a column leach test was conducted utilizing material crushed to 100% passing ⅝ inches. During testing, the material was leached for 28 days with a sodium cyanide solution. The material in the column was then washed for 30 days.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 72 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The column leach test results exhibited rapid leach kinetics. The highest-grade sample IPD-003 grading 9.3 g/t Au was tested twice, first under agglomeration and then without agglomeration, both results achieved gold recovery of 88% and 89% in 46 and 28 days respectively. Sample IDD-001 grading 1.25 g/t Au and 2.47% sulfide reached a gold recovery of 62% after 46 days. Sample IPDD-004 grading 0.74 g/t Au achieved 76% recovery after 46 days. The results of the column leach test work are presented in Table 10-10 and shown graphically in Figure 10-6.
Table 10-10 Summary Column Leach Test Results, KCA 2017 Program
Figure 10-6 : Column Leach Test Results Showing Cumulative Weight Percent Gold Extracted Over Days of Leach
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 73 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
10.5 | Discussion of Metallurgical Test Gold Recovery Curves |
10.5.1 | Discussion of Bottle Roll Test Recovery Curves |
Table 10-11Table 10-16 is a summary of all bottle roll tests completed on Isabella Pearl mine. These results present the very strong relationship between gold recovery and nominal particle size that is subjected to cyanidation. The relationship clearly demonstrates that the more work that is done on the mineral resources that is to be leached, i.e., crushing and grinding the greater the fines fraction, the greater the quantity of economic minerals to be liberated the greater the recovery and faster the recovery rate. This may be attributed to their very fine nature of the mineral grains and their encapsulation of gold within silica and weathering or oxidation resistant gangue minerals.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 74 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 10-11 Summary of All Bottle Roll Tests Completed on the Isabella Pearl Mine
10.5.2 | Discussion of Column Leach Test Gold Recovery Curves |
All 6 column leach tests performed on core samples from the Isabella Pearl mine are summarized in Table 10-12. The NaCN and Lime Consumption during the column leach tests are summarized in Table 10-13. Figure 10-7 presents column leach gold recovery curves for the 6 column leach tests.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 75 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The nature of the fast leach kinetics was recorded on every test, with 80 to 90 percent of total recovery occurring in the first 10 days of leaching.
Table 10-12 Summary of All Column Leach Tests Completed on the Isabella Pearl Mine
Table 10-13 : Summary of NaCN and Lime Consumption for the Column Leach Tests
Figure 10-7 : Column Leach Gold Recovery Curves for Column Leach Tests Completed
10.6 | Process Selection and Design Parameters |
Cyanidation test work (bottle roll and column leach), performed on representative mineral resources, confirms the close relationship between particle size and gold recovery. The greater the fines fraction the
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 76 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
higher the gold recovery. The results of all bottle roll and column leach tests performed are summarized by size fraction and presented in Table 10-14 and Table 10-15 below.
Table 10-14 : Bottle Roll Gold Recovery Estimate by Size Fraction
Table 10-15 : Column Leach Gold Recovery Estimation by Size Fraction
Interpreting these results, it was observed that:
● | A high level of gold recovery (plus 90 percent) could be achieved using a grinding and milling process. The capital cost and economics of milling, however, is prohibitive given the limited amount of mineral resources, leaving the most viable option to be a heap leach process with a carbon absorption/desorption and electrowinning given low silver to gold ratio. |
● | There exists a marked increase in gold recovery by decreasing the average size fraction of the mineral resources. Review of the combined gold recovery by bottle roll and column leach testing, determined that sizing the material to a p100 of 5/8 inch could reasonably expect a 25% increase in gold recovery (60 to 85%) over ROM size material. |
● | Based on the metallurgical test work completed, the recoveries presented in Table 10-16 are being used for the mine. Total gold recovery is expected over a four-month period. Considering the economic parameters used in the feasibility study, mineral resources above 0.61 g/t Au are currently being crushed to P80 of 5/8 inch and material between 0.33 and 0.61 g/t Au is being sent to a low-grade stockpile for either future crushing or direct placement on the heap as ROM. Total predicted gold recovery is 81% for all ore. No material is currently agglomerated. |
Table 10-16 : Gold Recovery Estimate
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 77 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Cyanide consumption is expected to average 0.75 kg/t (1.50 lb/ton) of leach material and lime consumption is estimated to average 3.0 kg/t (6.0 lb/ton) of leach material (Table 10-17).
Table 10-17 : NaCN and Lime Consumption
Material | Gold Recovery | NaCN Consumption | Lime Consumption |
ROM | 60 % | 0.75 kg/t | 6.0 kg/t |
5/8 Crush | 81 % | 0.75 kg/t | 6.0 kg/t |
10.7 | Metallurgical Summary |
In summary, lab test work is completed in a static state whereas production is in a dynamic state. Test work of the Isabella Pearl mine deposit samples are completed in column tests in a controlled environment and indicate ideal results.
Production heap leach is performed in a dynamic state where the ore is partially leached, then new ore is stacked above the previous lift, and placed under leach again. Once mining is complete the heap leach will continue to leach gold ounces. Based on the feasibility study column test work the estimated LOM achievable is 81% gold recovery.
Through December 2021, the mine has placed 146,993 gold ounces on the leach pad and has recovered 87,030 gold ounces. This includes gold ounces recovered from the overliner, ROM at beginning of mine life, and crushed ore. As of December 31, 2021, 59.2% of the gold placed has been recovered (Figure 10-8).
Figure 10-8 : Graph of Gold Ounces Placed vs. Gold Ounces Poured and Percent Gold Recovery
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 78 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The Isabella Pearl mine lab has confirmed fast gold extraction in 2021 Pearl column leach tests which are also noted in the Report of the Estimates of Reserves and Feasibility Study for the Isabella Pearl Project (December 31, 2017). Final gold extractions of the Pearl column tests varied from 78-87%, which is in line with the 81% estimated recovery shown in the Feasibility Study. Over the life of mine the gold ounces produced should achieve the estimated 81% feasibility study recovery.
Column test reagent consumptions correlated to predicted, 0.75 kg/t NaCN and 6.0 kg/t lime. The 2021 Pearl column leach tests NaCN consumptions were noted at 0.73 kg/ton for the November composite under leach to 2.26 kg/ton for a 12 ppm Au crusher stockpile grab sample. Caustic consumption varied widely due to unknown sample mineralogy.
Sodium Cyanide consumption during the first nine months of 2021 was 0.76 lb/ton vs 1.5 lb/ton (0.75 kg/t), closely reflecting consumption rates stated in the feasibility study.
10.7.1Opinion on Adequacy
The Qualified Persons have reviewed these results. The on-going column testing supports the planned metal recovery as well as the planned cyanide consumption. The comparison of feasibility results with continuous testing of mined ore demonstrates that the earlier work was representative of the deposit and the Qualified Persons consider that these data are appropriate and adequate for estimation of mineral reserves.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 79 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
11 | Mineral Resource Estimate |
11.1 | Introduction |
The modeling and estimation of mineral resources presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of December 31, 2021. WLMC models and estimates mineral resources from available technical information prior to the generation of mineral reserves. This estimate was prepared to comply with the new SEC regulations 17 CFR Subpart 229.1300 Regulation S-K, generally known as the “SK-1300” rule.
Modeling and estimation of mineral resources were carried out using the commercially available Maptek Vulcan software program, version 12.
Any statements and opinions expressed in this document are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements and opinions are true as of the effective date of this report.
11.2 | Mineral Resources Definitions |
According to S-K 1300, a mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, considering relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserve. Confidence in the estimate of Inferred mineral resources is insufficient to allow the meaningful application of technical and economic parameters.
11.2.1 | Inferred Mineral Resources |
An Inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated based on limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project and may not be converted to a mineral reserve.
11.2.2 | Indicated Mineral Resources |
An Indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 80 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable mineral reserve.
11.2.3 | Measured Mineral Resources |
A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section, in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve.
11.3 | Database |
Mineral resources described in this report are gold and silver bearing material that have been physically delineated by one or more methods including drilling, surface mapping, and other types of sampling. This material has been found to contain sufficient mineralization of an average grade to have potential that warrants further exploration evaluation. This material is reported as mineral resources only if the potential exists for reclassification into the mineral reserves category. Mineral resources cannot be classified in the mineral reserves category until technical, economic, and legal factors have been evaluated.
The modeling and estimation reported herein utilized the drill hole database compiled by WLMC. Drill holes with assay samples within the immediate mine area were imported into a Maptek Vulcan database. The extracted drill hole database contains 572 unique collar records (Table 11.1) and 29,523 assay records, broken down by drilling type as:
● | AT: 6 drill holes for 82.0 m (269 ft) |
● | RC: 513 drill holes for 46,229 m (151,670 ft) |
● | DDH: 36 drill holes for 3,564.5 m (11,695 ft) |
Industry standard validation checks of the database were carried out with minor corrections made where necessary. The database was reviewed for inconsistencies in naming conventions or analytical units, duplicate entries, interval, length, or distance values less than or equal to zero, blank or zero-value assay results, out-of-sequence intervals, intervals, or distances greater than the reported drill hole length, inappropriate collar locations, and missing interval and coordinate fields. No significant discrepancies with the data were noted.
Drill hole distance units are reported in meters and grade units are reported as either g/t or ppm. The collar coordinates were provided in the WGS 1984 UTM Zone 11N coordinate system. The observed nearest neighbor collar mean distance is 13.8 m. The Isabella Pearl drill hole and assay databases are
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 81 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
summarized in Table 11-1 and Table 11-2, respectively. Summary statistics were also tabulated for the assay data (Table 11-3).
Table 11-1 Isabella Pearl Drill Hole Database Summary
Description | DDH | RC | AT | Historical | Total |
Number of Drill Holes | 36 | 513 | 6 | 13 | 568 |
Total Length (m) | 3,564.5 | 46,229.0 | 82.0 | 1,586.5 | 51,462.0 |
Average Length (m) | 99.0 | 90.1 | 13.7 | 122.0 | 90.6 |
Meters Assayed | 1,950.6 | 41,638.7 | 82.0 | 1,575.8 | 45,247.1 |
Drill Holes with Downhole Surveys | 8 | 305 | 6 | 0 | 319 |
Table 11-2 : Isabella Pearl Assay Database Summary
Assay Summary | DDH | RC | AT | Historical | Total |
Number of Au Assays | 1,119 | 27,316 | 54 | 1,034 | 29,523 |
Total Length (m) | 1,950.6 | 41,638.7 | 82.0 | 1,575.8 | 45,247.1 |
Average Length (m) | 1.74 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.53 |
Average Au g/t | 2.30 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.30 |
Average Ag g/t | 12.07 | 2.51 | 1.04 | 0.77 | 2.78 |
Table 11-3 : Isabella Pearl Assay Statistics Summary
The Isabella Pearl assay database (Table 11-2) indicates that the mean gold grades of the DDH holes are significantly higher than the RC holes. The Combined Metals-Homestake and TXAU DDH were drilled primarily to collect metallurgical samples and verify important mineralized zones defined by previously drilled RC holes. The DDH therefore drilled a higher percentage of mineral resources than the RC holes, especially in the high-grade Pearl deposit. In addition, sampling of the DDH was primarily restricted to suspected mineralized intervals, while the RC holes were sampled over their entire lengths.
Drill hole logs are available for all holes except IC-1 through 37 (the earliest holes in the database) and IC-54, as well as copies of assay certificates for 147 of the holes, including all TXAU holes. A significant amount of information was collected from the drill logs and entered into spreadsheets and, where appropriate, the mine database, including the depth to water table, intervals drilled while injecting water, the amount of water returning with the RC sample cuttings, qualitative descriptions of RC sample recoveries, any comments regarding possible RC down-hole contamination noted on the drill logs, other comments written on the drill logs that pertain to water and recovery, alteration (degree of silicification), lithology
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 82 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
(overburden, welded and overlying unwelded Mickey Pass Tuff, granite), drill bit types and diameters, drill contractors, year of drilling, rig type, assay laboratory, analytical methods, and analytical detection limits. Although the database included oxidation codes, many of these codes were derived from the coding of the drill samples by an interpreted three-dimensional surface that conflicted with the oxidation notes in the drill logs in some cases. Oxidation data (oxide-mixed-sulfide) were therefore extracted from the drill logs and incorporated into the MDA digital database.
QA/QC data were also compiled by MDA from the paper copies of the Combined Metals-Homestake assay certificates. These data include internal laboratory check analyses of the original pulps and analyses of new pulps prepared from preparation rejects or duplicate samples.
An audit of the assay database by MDA led to the identification of data in the assay certificates that were not included in the TXAU database. Two RC holes, which had been re-entered and deepened sometime after the original holes were drilled, did not have the re-entry assay data in the database. Several intervals of other holes were also missing assay data. All missing assay data identified by MDA were added to the mine database.
11.3.1 | Database Backup |
WLMC and FGC company policy includes Windows personal computer folder backup that automatically syncs folders to a OneDrive cloud storage.
11.4 | Bulk Density |
MDA reported an average bulk density value of 2.20 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 14.6) for oxidized units and 2.40 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 13.4) for non-oxidized units in the Isabella Pearl deposit (Prenn & Gustin, 2013).
A total of 38 bulk density measurements were collected by HB Engineering from TXAU geotechnical DDH core, with values ranging from 1.58 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 20.5) to 3.20 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 10.0), with a median of 2.21 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 14.5) and an average value of 2.20 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 14.6). For the current update a conservative bulk density of 2.20 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 14.6) was assigned to the model for all units.
RQD data collected by HB Engineering from TXAU geotechnical DDH drill holes also suggests the presence of multiple zones of poor recovery, fractures, and voids (Figure 11-1). An additional factor may be required to accommodate the presence of voids and fractured rocks.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 83 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-1 : Plot of RQD vs. Elevation
11.5 | Wireframe Modeling |
11.5.1 | Topography |
The Isabella Pearl Mine Engineering department supplied a high-resolution georeferenced drone survey dated January 1, 2022, for topographic control.
11.5.2 | Gridded Surfaces |
Gridded surfaces were developed for the oxidation floor and lower granite contact based on logged lithology contacts (Figure 11-2).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 84 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-2 : Isometric View Looking North Showing Oxide Base (blue) and Granite (orange) Contacts
11.5.3 | Mineralization Envelopes |
Multiple geological structures directly influence the Isabella Pearl mineralization. Vein solids and fault traces were digitized and imported into Vulcan software. Three-dimensional surfaces of the Pearl, Civit Cat and Soda Springs fault, which separate the Mickey Pass Tuff and granitic basement, were created using the digitized fault traces and lithologic drill-hole data. A 3D representation of the colluvium was also generated from surface mapping and drill hole logs.
The Civit Cat North, Crimson, Silica Knob, Isabella, Scarlet North and South, and Pearl domains were modeled based on nominal 0.30 g/t Au (0.009 opst) grade shells using close spaced polygons snapped directly to drill hole assay intervals. To maintain consistency, lower grade assay intervals were incorporated into the modeled domains where appropriate. The interpreted polygons were then consolidated into three-dimensional triangulated wireframes, which were clipped to the updated topographic surface. Modeling of the domains also incorporated blasthole results and geological features exposed during mining, and the Pearl domain has been split into a lower grade “Vein” and higher grade “Main” sub-domain. The resulting mineralization domains were used to back-tag assay and composite intervals and provide reasonable volume constraints (Figure 11-3).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 85 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-3 : Isometric View of the Mineralization Domains comprising the Isabella Pearl Deposit
11.6 | Compositing |
The average length of assays intervals within the defined mineralization domains is 1.531 m (5.02 ft), with a mode of 1.524 m (5.00 ft) and a median length of 1.524 m (5.00 ft). 99% of the constrained assays are 1.524 m (5.00 ft) in length (Figure 11-4). Assays were therefore composited to 1.524 m (5.00 ft) within the defined domains. Residual composite lengths less than 0.762 m (2.50 ft) were merged with the adjacent interval. A small number of missing intervals were treated as nulls.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 86 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-4 : Histogram of Constrained Assay Sample Lengths
11.7 | Exploratory Data Analysis |
Summary statistics were calculated for the composite sample populations (Table 11-4). The Civit Cat North and Isabella sample populations demonstrate similar gold distributions as compared to the higher-grade Pearl mineralization. The highest average silver grade also occurs in the Pearl domain with very low average silver grades in the other domains (Figure 11-5).
Table 11-4 Constrained Composite Statistics
Au g/t | Civit Cat | Crimson | Isabella | Pearl Main | Pearl Veins | Scarlet South | Silica Knob |
Average | 0.69 | 1.09 | 0.50 | 3.97 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
Std Dev | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 6.70 | 2.54 | 0.77 | 0.38 |
CoV | 1.00 | 0.74 | 1.32 | 1.69 | 2.20 | 1.14 | 0.65 |
Minimum | 0.0001 | 0.0720 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.007 | 0.015 |
Maximum | 5.78 | 5.05 | 9.00 | 59.07 | 29.25 | 7.65 | 2.03 |
Count | 236 | 252 | 1487 | 855 | 416 | 183 | 148 |
Ag g/t | Civit Cat | Crimson | Isabella | Pearl Main | Pearl Veins | Scarlet South | Silica Knob |
Average | 9 | 10 | 2 | 44 | 7 | 3 | 3 |
Std Dev | 17 | 10 | 11 | 96 | 15 | 5 | 3 |
CoV | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Minimum | 0.0001 | 0.881 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.123 |
Maximum | 148 | 126 | 411 | 1214 | 130 | 51 | 16 |
Count | 236 | 252 | 1487 | 855 | 416 | 183 | 148 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 87 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-5 : Log-Probability Plots of Au and Ag Composites
The gold sample distributions for RC and DDH composites were also examined for evidence of bias in the Isabella and Pearl mineralization domains. The results suggest that RC drilling is in general slightly undervalued compared to the DDH (DH) drilling at Pearl (Figure 11-6), which may be due in part to the observed clustering of DDH drilling in the vicinity of the high-grade portion of the Pearl domain.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 88 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-6 : RC vs. DDH Drilling Results
A single true twin is available for grade comparison and analysis: IC-145 (a vertical RC drill hole) and IP-DD-002 (a vertical DDH). The separation between collars is 5.97 m (19.58 ft). Both drill holes penetrate the center of the Pearl domain.
Visual comparison of the composite grades between the two drill holes suggests the presence of localized downhole contamination below the oxide base, with elevated grades observed in the RC drill hole compared to the DDH drill hole (Figure 11-7). Potential contamination in RC drill holes appears to be limited to beneath the oxide base; to accommodate for a potential bias during estimation more restrictive estimation constraints were imposed on the Pearl model.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 89 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-7 : Twin Hole Au Assay Grade Comparison
11.8 | Treatment of Extreme Values |
The potential influence of extreme values during estimation was evaluated by grade capping analysis on the tagged and composited grade intervals in order. The presence of high-grade outliers was identified by disintegration analysis of the upper tails and examination of histograms and log-probability plots (Figure 11-8). Composite grades were reduced to the selected threshold prior to estimation. The Pearl capping threshold was then iteratively refined to minimize the relative difference between the resulting average Nearest Neighbor model and block grade estimates (Table 11-5). For the Pearl Veins, an additional range restriction of 60 m (197 ft) was placed on composites equal to or greater than 50% of the capping threshold.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 90 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-8 : Log-Probability Plots of Composite Capping Thresholds
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 91 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 11-5 Capping Thresholds
Gold | Civit Cat | Crimson | Isabella | Pearl Main | Pearl Veins | Scarlet S | Silica Knob |
Cap | 4.00 | 3.00 | NA | 50.00 | 10.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Minimum | 0.0001 | 0.072 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.007 | 0.015 |
Maximum | 5.78 | 5.05 | 9.00 | 59.07 | 29.25 | 7.65 | 2.03 |
Count | 236 | 252 | 1487 | 855 | 416 | 183 | 148 |
Number Capped | 2.00 | 9.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 |
Uncapped Mean | 0.69 | 1.09 | 0.50 | 3.97 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
Capped Mean | 0.68 | 1.07 | 0.50 | 3.93 | 1.04 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
Mean Above Cap | 5.22 | 3.58 | NA | 57.23 | 19.77 | 3.84 | 2.03 |
Percent Change | -2% | -2% | 0% | -1% | -10% | -9% | 0% |
Silver | Civit Cat | Crimson | Isabella | Pearl Main | Pearl Veins | Scarlet S | Silica Knob |
Cap | 100 | 100 | 100 | 250 | 100 | NA | NA |
Minimum | 0.0001 | 0.881 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.123 |
Maximum | 148 | 126 | 411 | 1214 | 130 | 51 | 16 |
Count | 236 | 252 | 1487 | 855 | 416 | 183 | 148 |
Number Capped | 2 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Uncapped Mean | 9 | 10 | 2 | 44 | 7 | 3 | 3 |
Capped Mean | 9 | 10 | 2 | 39 | 7 | 3 | 3 |
Mean Above Cap | 131 | 126 | 411 | 442 | 128 | NA | NA |
Percent Change | -3% | -1% | -11% | -12% | -2% | 0% | 0% |
11.9 | Continuity Analysis |
Continuity analysis was carried out on normal-score transformed variograms using composited grade intervals (Table 11-6). Only poorly defined experimental semi-variograms could be developed, but the variograms do provide information relevant to the definition of search ranges, anisotropy, and classification (Figure 11-9).
Table 11-6 Experimental Semi-Variograms and Modeled Rotations
Pearl Main | 90 > 0 | 0 > 249 | 0 > 150 |
C0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
C1 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
C2 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
R2 | 7 | 48 | 2 |
R3 | 54 | 85 | 21 |
Pearl Veins | -60 > 55 | 0 > 325 | 30 > 55 |
C0 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
C1 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 |
C2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
R2 | 53 | 115 | 10 |
R3 | 73 | 124 | 20 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 92 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 11-9 : Experimental Semi-Variogams
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 93 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
11.10Block Model
A rotated block model was established across the mine with the block model limits selected to cover the extent of the mineral resources and accommodate a potential pit shell (Table 11-7). A parent block size of 5.0 m x 5.0 m x 6.0 m (16.4 ft x 16.4 ft x 19.7 ft) was selected as representative of the pit shell configuration and selective mining unit.
Table 11-7 Block Model Setup
| Origin | Offset | Block Size | Sub-Cell | ||
X | 396,325.914 | 1760 | 5 | 0.5 | ||
Y | 4,273,503.559 | 850 | 5 | 0.5 | ||
Z | 1,400.000 | 462 | 6 | 0.5 | ||
Rotation | 125 degrees |
The block model contains variables for Au and Ag grade estimation, bulk density, classification, drill hole spacing and oxidation state. The modeled oxide floor was used to code blocks as either oxide or sulfide.
11.11Estimation and Classification
Inverse Distance Cubed (“ID3”) and Nearest Neighbor (“NN”) estimates were carried out using capped composites. A minimum of three and a maximum of twelve composites were used for estimation, within a search ellipsoid oriented parallel with each defined structure and extending 120 m (394 ft) x 120 m (394 ft) x 30 m (98 ft). The major and semi-major axes approximate the average strike and dip directions of the mineralization in each of the estimation areas. Based on preliminary mining results and analysis of blasthole grades, the orientation of the Isabella search ellipse was adjusted to impart a slight anisotropy with the principal axis oriented 040 degrees. Both gold and silver were modeled and estimated.
In order to provide a whole-block estimate suitable for open pit mine planning and reserve reporting, the block model was regularized after estimation to a 5.0 m (16.4 ft) x 5.0 m (16.4 ft) x 6.0 m (19.7 ft) whole block estimate by volume inclusion percent and diluted at zero grade. Blocks that intercepted the modeled colluvium were assigned a zero grade.
Classification parameters were derived from the original MDA criteria (Prenn & Gustin, 2013). The most relevant factors used in the classification process were:
● | Drill hole spacing density |
● | Level of confidence in the geological interpretation |
● | Observed continuity of mineralization |
● | Direct proximity to a drill hole |
Parent blocks were classified algorithmically by drill hole spacing geometry as follows:
● | A block within 15.0 m (49.0 ft) of a 2008 series DDH drill hole, or the IP-DD-002 DDH drill hole, was classified as a Measured mineral resource. Only blocks within the modeled Pearl domain were classified as Measured mineral resources. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 94 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | A block was classified as an Indicated mineral resource if five or more composites from at least two drill holes were used for estimation and the nearest composite was within 25.0 m (82.0 ft). |
● | All other estimated blocks are classified as Inferred. |
An example of a typical cross section showing the drill hole data and modeled mineral-domain envelopes in the most strongly mineralized portions of the Isabella, Pearl and Civit Cat deposits is in Figure 11-10.
WLMC is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other issues that could materially affect the estimation of mineral resources at Isabella Pearl.
Figure 11-10 : Typical Cross-Section Looking NW Showing Gold Grades (g/t) and Classification
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 95 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
11.12Mineral Resource Estimate
WLMC models and estimates mineral resources prior to establishing mineral reserves. Mineral resources at Isabella Pearl are further defined by WLMC as mineral resources within a constraining pit shell and above a defined cut-off value. Mineral resources reported herein has been constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman optimized pit shell and is reported at a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au (0.01 opst), derived from the unit costs and recoveries discussed in Section 12.6.2. The gold price is based on the average consensus forecast for 2022 through 2024 (CIBC, 2021). Other costs are based on actual Isabella Pearl production costs. The mining method is by open pit extraction and all Measured and Indicated mineral resources within the design pit shell and above cut-off have been converted to mineral reserves.
Measured and Indicated mineral resources reported for Isabella Pearl contain 598 thousand tonnes (659.2 thousand short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 2.12 g/t Au (0.062 opst) and 26 g/t Ag (0.8 opst) (Table 11-8). Inferred mineral resources reported for Isabella Pearl contain 288.2 thousand tonnes (317.7 thousand short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.55 g/t Au (0.045 opst) and 17 g/t Ag (0.5 opst).
Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Oxide mineral resources, and only sulfide mineralization within the Pearl pit pushback, are reported as mineral resources.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 96 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 11-8 Mineral Resource Inventory for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, December 31, 2021
Class | Cut-off Au | Phase | Tonnes | Short Tons | Au | Au | Ag | Ag | Au | Ag |
Measured | 0.33 | Pushback Oxide | 89,000 | 98,100 | 2.38 | 0.069 | 55 | 1.6 | 6,800 | 157,600 |
Measured | 2.00 | Pushback Sulfide | 110,600 | 121,900 | 4.98 | 0.145 | 51 | 1.5 | 17,700 | 180,100 |
Total Measured | --- | --- | 199,600 | 220,000 | 3.82 | 0.111 | 53 | 1.5 | 24,500 | 337,700 |
Indicated | 0.33 | Pushback Oxide | 14,800 | 16,300 | 2.32 | 0.068 | 45 | 1.3 | 1,100 | 21,200 |
Indicated | 2.00 | Pushback Sulfide | 40,800 | 45,000 | 3.79 | 0.111 | 48 | 1.4 | 5,000 | 62,700 |
Indicated | 0.33 | Scarlet S | 46,900 | 51,700 | 0.70 | 0.020 | 5 | 0.2 | 1,100 | 7,800 |
Indicated | 0.33 | Silica Knob | 80,600 | 88,900 | 0.56 | 0.016 | 3 | 0.1 | 1,400 | 8,200 |
Indicated | 0.33 | Crimson | 215,200 | 237,200 | 1.12 | 0.033 | 9 | 0.2 | 7,700 | 59,000 |
Total Indicated | --- | --- | 398,400 | 439,200 | 1.27 | 0.037 | 12 | 0.4 | 16,300 | 158,900 |
Mea + Ind | --- | --- | 598,000 | 659,200 | 2.12 | 0.062 | 26 | 0.8 | 40,800 | 496,600 |
Inferred | 0.33 | Pushback Oxide | 10,300 | 11,400 | 2.41 | 0.070 | 38 | 1.1 | 800 | 12,500 |
Inferred | 2.00 | Pushback Sulfide | 28,800 | 31,800 | 3.77 | 0.110 | 56 | 1.6 | 3,500 | 51,600 |
Inferred | 0.33 | Civit Cat | 66,100 | 72,900 | 0.58 | 0.017 | 5 | 0.1 | 1,200 | 10,200 |
Inferred | 0.33 | Pearl | 92,500 | 102,000 | 2.18 | 0.064 | 19 | 0.6 | 6,500 | 57,800 |
Inferred | 0.33 | Scarlet S | 900 | 1,000 | 0.51 | 0.015 | 3 | 0.1 | - | 100 |
Inferred | 0.33 | Silica Knob | 6,700 | 7,400 | 0.44 | 0.013 | 3 | 0.1 | 100 | 600 |
Inferred | 0.33 | Crimson | 82,800 | 91,300 | 0.83 | 0.024 | 8 | 0.2 | 2,200 | 21,600 |
Total Inf | --- | --- | 288,200 | 317,700 | 1.55 | 0.045 | 17 | 0.5 | 14,400 | 154,400 |
Notes:
1. | Reported at a cut-off of 0.33 Au g/t (0.01 Au opst) for oxide mineral resources and 2.00 Au g/t (0.058 opst) for sulfide mineral resources. |
2. | Whole block diluted estimates reported within an optimized pit shell. |
3. | Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
4. | Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. |
5. | Mineral resources reported are exclusive of reserves. |
11.13Risk Factors
Relevant factors which may affect the estimation of mineral resources include changes to the geological, geotechnical and geometallurgical models, infill drilling to convert material to a higher classification, drilling to test for extensions to known mineral resources, collection of additional bulk density data and significant changes to commodity prices. It should be noted that these and other factors pose potential risks and opportunities, of greater or lesser degree, to the estimate as the model is based on currently available data. Risks associated with key estimation parameters are tabulated in Table 11-9.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 97 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 11-9 : Estimation Risk Factors
Category | Description | Risk | Potential for |
Database | Database Integrity | Assay database is compiled from historical data. | Very Low |
Drilling | Technique | 6 AT drill holes included in estimate. | Low |
Drilling | Technique | Infill drilling and mining have confirmed the model. | Low |
Drilling | Contamination | Infill drilling and mining have confirmed the model. | Low |
Drilling | Logging | Infill drilling and mining have confirmed the model. | Low |
Drilling | Recovery | RQD results show a wide range of recoveries. Blast hole and infill grades confirm model. | Low |
Drilling | Data Density | Drill hole spacing is ~ 19 m. | Low |
Drilling | Survey | Only 10% of drill holes have downhole surveys. | Low |
Geology | Geological Interpretation | Based on drill holes and field mapping. | Low |
Geology | Oxide Base | WLMC has completed targeted drilling to determine the base of the oxide zone | Low |
Geology | Oxide Zone | CN leach assays have quantified the impact of transitional material. | Low |
Model | Estimation | ID3 is used for estimation. | Very Low |
Model | Bulk Density | Significant voids may reduce recoverable tonnage. Mining of deeper orebody reduces risk. | Low |
Model | Grade Continuity | Infill drilling and mining have confirmed the model. | Low |
Model | Economics | Reasonable cutoff grades have been applied. | Low |
Sampling | Predominantly 1.52m (5ft) samples | Sample size is based on RC drilling intervals. | Very Low |
Sampling | Quality of assay data | WLMC has relied on MDA for quality assessment of historical data. | Low |
11.14Model to Production Reconciliation
Gustavson reviewed the reconciliation data for the period November 2019 to December 2021. Gustavson noted local fluctuations where production from specific areas of the deposit was small and where
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 98 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
contributions to, or from, the low-grade stockpile occurred, but the overall production weighted reconciliations are considered reasonable. The overall weighted reconciliation for the Isabella area the is 103%, Pearl 117% and combined 108%. In other words, the production exceeded the model’s metal prediction by 3%, 17% and 8% respectively.
11.15Opinion on Adequacy
Gustavson considers that the WLMC 2021 mineral resource estimate meets industry standards. The reconciliation performance shows that in general the model is correctly predicting the metal production, and Gustavson considers that the sampling and estimation methodology permit the estimation of Measured and Indicated mineral resource estimates, and that sufficient technical information is available to convert mineral resources to Proven and Probable mineral reserves.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 99 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
12 | Mineral Reserve Estimate |
12.1 | Introduction |
The mineral reserve estimates presented herein were prepared according to the guidelines of Regulation S-K part 1300. The reserve estimate is based on technical data and information available as of December 31, 2021.
12.2 | Mineral Reserve Definitions |
A mineral reserve is an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted.
12.2.1 | Probable Mineral Reserve |
A Probable mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of an Indicated and, in some circumstances, Measured mineral resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses which may occur when the material is mined. Appropriate assessments, which may include feasibility studies, have been carried out and include considerations of and modifications by realistically assumed mining, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social, and governmental factors. These assessments demonstrate at the time of reporting that extraction is reasonably justified. A Probable mineral reserve has a lower level of confidence than a Proven mineral reserve.
12.2.2 | Proven Mineral Resource |
A Proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured mineral resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses which may occur when the material is mined. Appropriate assessments, which may include feasibility studies, have been carried out and include consideration of and modification by realistically assumed mining, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social, and governmental factors. These assessments demonstrate at the time of reporting that extraction is reasonably justified.
Proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource.
12.3 | Previous Mineral Reserve Estimate |
A previous estimate of Proven and Probable mineral reserves was released by WLMC with an effective date of December 31, 2020 (Table 12-1); previous mineral reserves were based on a gold price of $1,477/oz Au. Mineral reserves stated in the table below are contained within and engineered pit design following the $1,477/oz Au sales price Lerchs-Grossman pit.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 100 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 12-1 : Mineral Reserve Statement Isabella Pearl Mine, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2020
Notes:
1. | Metal prices used for P&P reserves were $1,477 per ounce of gold and $17.47 per ounce of silver. These prices reflect the three-year trailing average prices for gold and silver |
2. | The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.38 Au g/t. |
3. | Mining, processing, energy, administrative and smelting/refining costs were based on 2020 actual costs for the Isabella Pearl mine. |
4. | Metallurgical gold recovery assumptions used were 81% for all ore which is currently being crushed. These recoveries reflect predicted average recoveries from metallurgical test programs. |
5. | P&P reserves are diluted and factored for expected mining recovery. |
6. | Figures in tables are rounded to reflect estimate precision and small differences generated by rounding are not material to estimates |
7. | 100% of the pit constrained Measured & Indicated mineral resources were converted to reserves. |
12.4 | Mineral Reserve Estimation |
The conversion of mineral resources to mineral reserves is based on modifying factors applied to Lerchs-Grossmann (LG) pit optimization, detailed pit design, scheduling and associated modifying parameters. Detailed access, haulage, and operational cost criteria were applied in this process for each deposit (Isabella, Pearl, Civit Cat North, and Scarlet South). The mine was built in metric units and all metal grades are g/t.
The orientation, proximity to the topographic surface, and geological controls of the Isabella Pearl mineralization support mining of the mineral reserves with open pit mining techniques. To calculate the mineable reserve, pits were designed following an optimized LG pit based on a $1,738 oz Au sales price. This price was chosen to create the primary guide surface based on a price sensitivity and subsequent profitability study that showed that the $1,738 pit maximized profitability while reducing capital requirements. The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au which is based on the consensus 2022-2024 average price of $1,738/oz for gold (CIBC, 2021) observed at the time of this mineral reserve reporting.
12.5 | Mineral Reserve Estimates |
The Isabella Pearl mine open pit mineral reserve statement with an effective date of December 31, 2021, is presented in Table 12-2, and by deposit, in Table 12-3.
The Proven and Probable mineral reserves reported for Isabella Pearl contain 1.36 million tonnes (1.50 million short tons) at an average gold grade of 2.78 g/t Au (0.081 opst) and 24 g/t Ag (0.7 opst) (Table 12-2). The mine mineral reserves are based on a gold price of $1,738/oz Au. Mineral reserves stated in
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 101 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
the table below are contained within and engineered pit design following the $1,738/oz Au sales price Lerchs-Grossman pit. The high-grade and low-grade stockpiles of ore mined but not processed are included in the inventory of 2021 mineral reserves.
Table 12-2 : Mineral Reserve Estimates for the Isabella Pearl Deposit, Mineral County, Nevada, as of December 31, 2021
Table 12-3 : Mineral Reserves by Deposit for the Isabella Pearl Mine as of December 31, 2021
Notes:
1. | Metal prices used for P&P reserves were $1,738 per ounce of gold and $23.22 per ounce of silver. These prices reflect the consensus 2022-2024 average prices for gold and silver (CIBC, 2021). |
2. | The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.33 Au g/t. |
3. | Mining, processing, energy, administrative and smelting/refining costs were based on 2021 actual costs for the Isabella Pearl mine. |
4. | Metallurgical gold recovery assumptions used were 81% for all ore which is currently being crushed. These recoveries reflect predicted average recoveries from metallurgical test programs. |
5. | P&P reserves are diluted and factored for expected mining recovery. |
6. | Figures in tables are rounded to reflect estimate precision and small differences generated by rounding are not material to estimates. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 102 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
12.6 | Conversion of Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserve |
12.6.1 | Dilution |
The block model created and used for the estimation of reserves explicitly models dilution. The minimum mining unit is a 5m x 5m x 6m (vertical) block and the Au grade of economically mineralized zones is diluted accordingly to the amount of uneconomic material present within each block, as defined during the reblocking procedure.
In order to provide a whole-block estimate suitable for open pit mine planning and reserve reporting, the block model was regularized after estimation to a Selective Mining Unit (SMU) size of 5.0 m (16.4 ft) x 5.0 m (16.4 ft) x 6.0 m (19.7 ft) whole block grade by volume inclusion percent and diluted at zero grade. The regularization process calculates the average grade weighted by the volume of the sub-blocks or portions of sub-blocks falling within the SMU. If the total volume inclusion is less than 100% then the grade of the SMU block is diluted with zero grade for the remaining portion.
12.6.2 | Cut-off Grade |
For this reserve report, the gold cut-off grade for the deposit is estimated at 0.33 g/t Au based on 2021 actual costs and historical data. This is the cut-off grade that was applied to Measured and Indicated resources for conversion to Proven and Probable reserves. The internal or marginal gold cut-off grade estimated for high-grade crushed ore is currently less than the 0.33 g/t Au cut-off for low-grade (Table 12-4). In this case, all material should be crushed. Operationally, the previously defined cut-over grade of 0.61 g/t Au is being maintained to prioritize high-grade ore going on to the heap leach pad. Ore that is between a gold grade of 0.33 g/t and 0.61 g/t Au is being sent to the low-grade stockpile for future processing or blending with high-grade material.
Table 12-4 shows the marginal cut-off grade assumptions used for the mineral reserve estimate.
Table 12-4 : Isabella Pearl Marginal Cut-off Grade Assumptions
Gold Price: | $/Oz | $1,738 | $/gram | $55.8 |
Charges | % | 0.075 |
|
|
Royalty | % | 3.000 |
|
|
Selling Cost | $/Oz | $53.4 | $/gram | $1.72 |
| Unit | WASTE | LOW GRADE | HIGH GRADE |
Mining Cost: | $/tonne | $0.23 |
|
|
Rehandling Cost: | $/tonne |
| $1.00 | $1.00 |
Mining Labor | $/tonne |
|
|
|
Crushing | $/tonne |
|
| $2.71 |
Crush ore placement | $/tonne |
|
|
|
Processing Cost: | $/tonne |
| $6.80 | 6.80 |
Energy | $/tonne |
| $0.78 | 0.78 |
G&A Cost | $/tonne |
| $3.99 | 3.99 |
Rehabilitation Cost | $/tonne | $0.70 |
|
|
Processing Recovery |
|
| 60.0% | 81.0% |
Calculations | ||||
“Processing Cost” | $/tonne |
| $11.64 | $14.36 |
Marginal Cut-off | gram/tonne |
| 0.358 | 0.327 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 103 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
In summary, ore, low grade, and waste are currently being classified as follows:
Waste: 0.00 – 0.33 g/t
Low-Grade: 0.33 – 0.61 g/t
High-Grade: > 0.61 g/t
12.7 | Relevant Factors |
The QP’s are not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other issues that could materially affect the mineral reserves stated here.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 104 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13 | Mining Methods |
13.1 | Mining Methods Summary |
The Isabella Pearl mine design consists of one main pit and several smaller sub-pits accessing the Isabella, Pearl and Civit Cat North deposits. Open pit mining is conducted by conventional diesel-powered equipment, utilizing a combination of blasthole drills, wheel loaders, and 91-tonne (100-short ton) trucks to define, and handle ore and waste. Support equipment includes graders, track dozers, and water trucks. Higher-grade ore (>0.61 g/t Au) is hauled to the crushing area and crushed before being placed on the leach pad. Low-grade ore between 0.33 and 0.61 g/t Au is hauled directly to the low-grade stockpile. Waste rock is stored in the waste rock facility located near the pit to reduce haulage costs.
The final pit was designed using 6 m (20 ft) benches with a bench face angle of 68°, and an inter-ramp slope of 49.7° between a triple bench-catch of 8 m (26 ft). Haul roads were designed to 14 m (46 ft) widths for one-way traffic and 24 m (79 ft) widths for two-way traffic. These widths included an external safety berm in compliance with Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) regulations. The final location of the ramps was optimized to reduce the overall waste stripping in areas where the pit slope was required to be less than 50°.
Low-grade ROM ore was initially placed on the heap leach pad with only lime addition on pad areas protected by a minimum of four feet of cover over the leach pad liner and collector piping system. Currently, high-grade ore is hauled to the crusher pad stockpile to then fed to the crusher by a front-end loader, then delivered to the heap by a stacker conveyor system. Low-grade ore is currently being stored in the low-grade stockpile for either future crushing.
The mine pits will generate an estimated total of 3.66 million tonnes (4.1 million short tons) of waste rock. The dump face is at the estimated 40° angle of repose of the material. The Pearl dump is being built from the south toe upward, with the outer slopes concurrently graded to 3(Horizontal):1(Vertical). The outer faces of the graded waste are being contoured, compacted, overlain with growth medium and re-vegetated when it is practical. Contouring and re-vegetation of the top of the dump will occur during post-production reclamation.
Isabella Pearl mining operations are being conducted by a contractor. Isabella Pearl production is scheduled to mine up to 500,000 tonnes (551,000 short tons) of material (ore and waste) per month. The current plan targets WLMC to process an approximate average of 55,000 tonnes (60,600 short tons) of ore per month over the LOM. Major mining equipment currently includes one Caterpillar D8 dozer, one Caterpillar D9 dozer, two Caterpillar 14M motor graders, two 769 Caterpillar water trucks, two lube trucks and two mechanic’s trucks.
The mine is currently in operation 12 hours per day, 7 days per week (12/7). During production, mining operations require two crews operating on twelve-hour rotating shifts.
During mining operations, blasthole samples are collected and assayed to provide control for ore and waste segregation. The resulting information is used to assign a material type to the blocks representing
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 105 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
the active benches. Each block is assigned a destination code based on classification of the material (high-grade ore, low-grade ore, and waste). Following assay and ore/waste designation, visual identification of waste is made by the site geologist and compared to the mine block model. The tonnage of this material is tracked by WLMC geologists and the mine production reporting system.
13.2 | Geotechnical Data, Testing and Analysis |
13.2.1 | Pit Slope Geotechnical Evaluation |
Geotechnical studies completed for the estimation of stable pit-slope angles centered on the Pearl Ore Deposit sub-pit. Table 13-1 presents the targeted pit slopes for the mine. These are overall slope angles (pit crest to floor) which are estimated to be stable against mass (deep) circular failure. The applicable quadrants are illustrated on Figure 13-1
Table 13-1 Maximum Recommended Pit Slope Angles
*Based on Bishop Modified Method
Figure 13-1 Pit Slope Quadrants
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 106 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.2.2 | South Highwall Geotechnical Assessment |
In 2021, WLMC retained Tierra Group International Ltd. (Tierra) to conduct geotechnical assessments with an emphasis in the south highwall of the planned Phase II expansion of the Pearl pit at the Isabella Pearl mine. The south highwall will encroach and undercut the Pearl South Fault Zone Figure 13-2. A limited geotechnical drilling program was undertaken by WLMC in 2021 to provide rock mass characterization information that could be used for slope stability analysis.
Inspection of the Phase II Pit design resulted in the identification of a critical cross-section in the south highwall due to its adverse configuration with respect to the Pearl South Fault Zone and orientation of the WNW-striking shear fabric.
Figure 13-2 View looking South in the Pearl Pit showing continuous, moderately to shallowly-dipping shears of the Pearl Fault
Geotechnical information consists in the pit mapping structural database and the geotechnical core logging and core orientation conducted on 3-boreholes totaling 191 m (627 ft) undertaken by WLMC in January 2021 (Table 13-2).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 107 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 13-2 Location and Design of the 2021 Geotechnical Drilling Program
Hole ID | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | Elevation (m) | Total Depth (m) | Azimuth (°) | Inclination (°) |
GTDD-01 | 397,634.2 | 4,272,727 | 1711.4 | 51.5 | 225 | -70 |
GTDD-02 | 397,506.1 | 4,272,814 | 1686.1 | 71.2 | 218 | -71 |
GTDD-03 | 397,542.5 | 4,272,779 | 1687.4 | 68.3 | 230 | -70 |
Total | 191.0 | | |
Note - Metric system used, WGS84; - Reported azimuth and inclination based on downhole deviation surveys
Geotechnical core logging data was used to develop the following:
● | Rock mass ratings (RMR). |
● | Kinematic analyses to estimate the cumulative frequency of structural controls over wedges and planar failures for benches in the hanging wall (including north and east highwalls) and footwall (including south and west highwalls) of the Pearl Fault were also undertaken. |
● | Two-dimensional, limit equilibrium slope stability analysis to estimate factors of safety were completed. |
Tierra determined that Phase I of the Pearl Pit has performed outstandingly reaching heights of about 100 m (328 ft) and overall angles of 40° to 45°. Highwalls are formed by a sequence of stronger intrusive and weaker tuff units and benches generally comply with the design with exceptions in the stronger, structurally controlled units.
Kinematic and slope stability analyses were undertaken by Tierra to verify structural and rock mass instability mechanisms. Reconciliation between the kinematic analyses and observed bench performance would indicate that in general, discontinuities exhibit high strength.
Preliminary 2D limit equilibrium slope stability analysis suggests that as the south highwall of Phase I and Phase II Pits encroach the Pearl South Fault Zone instability mechanisms may be triggered as indicated by the calculated Factors of Safety (FOS) shown in Table 13-3. In relative terms, the FOS are lowered as the Phase I Pit deepens and in Phase II where the Pearl South Fault Zone is undercut.
Table 13-3 Summary of FOS
Material | Scenario 1: | Scenario 2: | Scenario 3: |
Case 1: All isotropic | 1.24 | 1.05 | 1.09 |
Case 2: HW and FW isotropic; PSFZ anisotropic | 1.30 | 1.08 | 1.17 |
Case 2: PSFZ and FW isotropic; HW anisotropic | 1.05 | --- | 0.99 |
13.2.3 | Recommendations |
The following are recommendation for consideration at Isabella Pearl:
● | Implement a Short-Term Monitoring Program to the south highwall. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 108 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | Reconcile core orientation results from GTDD-01 to 03 that show discrepancies with pit mapping structural data. This information is relevant to quantify rock anisotropy at depth. |
● | Develop a pit mapping program that captures the limits between intrusive bodies and tuff and the relevant RMR parameters and develop lithological models. This is relevant to planning drill and blast patterns. |
● | Investigate the absence of the SW-striking set in the Pearl Fault footwall that are observed in its hanging wall. This is relevant to characterize structural controls that could involve both the WNW and SW-striking rock anisotropy. |
● | Investigate further the steeper (67°) and flatter (41°) shear sets mapped in Phase I Pit. This is relevant as they could result in complex wedges mechanisms. |
● | Implement 3D analysis to verify stability conditions. |
● | Update the site’s Ground Control Monitoring Plan to incorporate monitoring and data collection considerations. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 109 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.3 | Hydrogeology |
A hydrogeological study was conducted by Aqua Hydrogeologic Consulting, LLC (Aqua) to determine regional hydrogeologic conditions underlying the Isabella Pearl mine area (Aqua, 2012, 2016). Groundwater movement within the mine area and surrounding area is dominated by the Walker Lane fault system. The faults within this system are primarily northwest-southeast trending faults. Water movement through the tuffs and underlying granitic rocks is through fractures associated with the fault system. The overall groundwater gradient is towards the south and southwest direction.
WLMC acquired the property in 2016 and drilled a production water well downgradient of the mine area in the historical Santa Fe corridor. WLMC drilled another production water well in the same corridor shortly after production commenced in early 2019.
13.3.1 | Groundwater |
Monitoring well drilling programs were conducted by the previous operator (TXAU) in the mine area resulting in 5 monitoring wells being active at the commencement of operations in 2018. All monitoring wells comply with Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) requirements. Because of fractured geology (compartmentalization) in the Isabella Pearl mine area, depth to groundwater varies. Within this area, the depth to groundwater varies from an elevation of 1,680 m (5,512 ft) approximately 305 m (1,000 ft) northwest of the main Isabella Pearl mine pit at IPMW- 2, to 1,565 m (5,134 ft) in the center of the proposed pit at PW-12-33 The locations of the monitoring wells IPMW-1, IPMW- 2, PW-12-33, PW-12-34 and 1973 Well are shown on Figure 13-3.
Aqua conducted a monitoring program to determine the depths to groundwater in the monitoring wells drilled in the vicinity of the proposed Isabella Pearl mine pit (Aqua, 2012). In 2012, three wells were drilled to the depth of 1,543.5 m (5,064 ft) (masl), 34.8 m (100 ft) below the lowest portion of the proposed mine pit bottom. A monitoring program was then initiated consisting of monthly water level readings and quarterly water chemistry analyses to characterize groundwater levels and flow patterns and to acquire baseline groundwater chemistry data.
Based on the monitoring well water level readings, groundwater was expected to not be encountered at the maximum depth of the proposed mine pit (1,574 m; 5,164 ft masl). The static groundwater level at monitoring well PW-12-33, which penetrates the deepest portion of the final Pearl Pit, was measured monthly from April through September 2012. After initial static water level stabilization in April, groundwater depths measured in May through September range from 1,564.5 m (5,133 ft) to 1,565.5 m (5,136 ft) masl.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 110 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 13-3 Water Monitoring Well Locations
Based on the groundwater level measurements, the deepest portion of the proposed mine pit would be 9.5 m (31.09 ft) to 8.5 m (27.96 ft) above the groundwater table and therefore, a pit lake would not develop during active mining operations or after final mine closure.
13.3.2 | Temporary and Permanent Diversion Channels |
Two sub-area watershed basins exist up-gradient of the Isabella Pearl mine and process facilities. The natural drainage path from the two watershed basins travels along the west and east sides of the process facilities. For further protection, drainage channels, berms, and ditches have been constructed on the east and west side of the facility to convey the existing drainage to its pre-development flow path.
13.4 | Mine and Waste Rock Storage Design, Production Rates and Mine Life |
13.4.1 | Mine Design |
The final pit was designed using 6 m (20 ft) benches, a bench face angle of 68° and an inter-ramp slope of 49.7° between a triple bench-catch of 8 m (26 ft). Haul roads were designed to 14 m (46 ft) widths for one-way traffic and 24 m (79 ft) widths for two-way traffic. These widths included an external berm. The
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 111 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
final location of the ramps was optimized to reduce the overall pit slopes in areas where the pit slope was required to be less than 50°. Table 13-4 provides the detailed parameters used for pit design.
Table 13-4 Designed Pit Parameters
13.4.1.1 | Pit Design Results |
Figure 13-4 shows the final pit for Isabella Pearl while Figure 13-5 and Figure 13-6 provide a plan and section view of the inner pits. Table 13-5 details the ore and waste tonnages, mineral reserves, reported here in more detail by pit.
Figure 13-4 Isabella Pearl – Final Pit Plan View
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 112 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 13-5 Isabella Pearl Designed Pits - Plan View
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 113 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 13-6 Isabella Pearl Designed Pits - Section View
Table 13-5 Initial Isabella Pearl Designed Pit Reserves
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 114 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.5 | Waste Rock Storage Design |
The mine pits will generate an estimated total of 23 million tonnes (25 million short tons) of waste rock. Waste is being deposited at the location south of the final pit as shown on Figure 13-7.
Preproduction and 1st year waste rock were end-dumped on natural ground first from near the crest elevation of the Pearl pit, falling southward toward a natural swale. The dump face is expected to advance at the estimated 40° angle of repose of the material. Starting in year 2 of production, the Pearl dump was built from the south toe upward, with the outer slopes concurrently graded to 3(Horizontal):1(Vertical). The outer faces of the graded waste will be contoured, compacted, overlain with growth medium and re-vegetated as soon as it is practical. Contouring and re-vegetation of the top of the dump will occur during post-production reclamation.
Figure 13-7 Isabella Pearl Waste Rock Dump
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 115 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.6 | Haulage |
Haulage requirements in this study were defined by WLMC. Utilizing detailed haulage profiles and production schedule information, cycle times and then equipment requirements were determined. The design width of 2-way haulage roads is 24 m (79 ft), including safety berm base widths. Roads have been designed in accordance with the Project Engineer’s recommendations. Protective shoulder berms have been constructed in compliance with Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) regulations. The waste rock dump location was selected to minimize disturbed acreage, haulage distance and the energy cost of construction.
Low-grade ROM ore was not crushed and was placed on the heap leach pad without preparation and only on pad areas protected by a minimum of four feet of cover over the leach pad liner and collector piping system. Most of such material was placed in interior portions of the leach heap to minimize the difficulty of re-grading for reclamation.
Higher-grade oxidized ore is hauled to a crusher pad stockpile to then be fed to the crusher by a front-end loader. Ore may be delivered to the heap by either haulage trucks or a conveyor system.
13.7 | Mine Production Schedule |
The production schedule was developed to mine up to 600,000 tonnes (661,400 short tonnes) of material per month from the four-phase pit over the remaining 4-year life. The Pearl zone is mined in two phases (Pearl Phase 1 & 2) to balance the high strip ratio of the upper benches and maintain and adequate cash flow balance. The mine production schedule is shown in Table 13-6.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 116 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 13-6 Mine Production Schedule
Description | Units | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | TOTAL |
Total Material Tonnes Mined (t) | t | 3,950,000 | 438,241 | - | - | 4,388,241 |
Waste Tonnes Mined (t) | t | 3,260,759 | 218,727 | - | - | 3,479,487 |
Ore Tonnes Mined (t) | t | 689,241 | 219,514 | - | - | 908,754 |
High Grade Tonnes Mined | t | 546,390 | 211,701 | - | - | 758,091 |
Low Grade Tonnes Mined | t | 142,851 | 7,813 | - | - | 150,664 |
Ore Gold Grade Mined | g/t | 3.43 | 4.77 | - | - | 3.75 |
High Grade Mined | g/t | 4.21 | 4.92 | - | - | 4.41 |
Low Grade Mined | g/t | 0.46 | 0.50 | - | - | 0.47 |
Gold Ounces Mined | oz. | 76,030 | 33,636 | - | - | 109,666 |
High Grade Ounces Mined | oz. | 73,900 | 33,509 | - | - | 107,409 |
Low Grade Ounces Mined | oz. | 2,130 | 127 | - | - | 2,257 |
Ore Tonnes Crushed (t) | t | 660,000 | 596,889 | 100,860 | - | 1,357,749 |
High Grade Tonnes Crushed | t | 416,065 | 255,160 | 100,860 | - | 772,086 |
Low Grade Tonnes Crushed | t | 243,935 | 341,729 | - | - | 585,664 |
Ore Gold Grade Crushed (g/t) | g/t | 2.73 | 2.47 | 5.00 | - | 2.78 |
High Grade Crushed | g/t | 4.04 | 5.09 | 5.00 | - | 4.51 |
Low Grade Crushed | g/t | 0.51 | 0.51 | - | - | 0.51 |
Gold Ounces Crushed (oz.) | oz. | 58,032 | 47,319 | 16,198 | - | 121,549 |
High Grade Ounces Crushed | oz. | 53,997 | 41,754 | 16,198 | - | 111,950 |
Low Grade Ounces Crushed | oz. | 4,035 | 5,565 | - | - | 9,600 |
13.8 | Mining Operations |
Mining Operations are conducted by a contractor. Current plans call for WLMC to mine and process an approximate average of 54,400 tonnes (60,000 short tons) of ore per month over a period of 48 months including approximately 4 months of pre-production development and construction and 3 months of residual leaching. The mine is in operation 24 hours per day, 7 days per week (24/7) for the duration of the mine.
Ore is conventionally drilled and blasted in 6 m (20 ft) benches. The ore is loaded with a 992 front-end loader into 91-tonne (100-short ton) capacity mine haulage trucks and hauled to the ore processing area or the waste rock dump facility
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 117 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.8.1 | Ore Control |
During mining operations, blasthole samples are collected and assayed to provide control for ore and waste segregation. The resulting information is used to assign a material type to the blocks representing the active benches. Each block is assigned a destination code based on classification of the material (ore, oxidized waste, or unoxidized waste). Following assay and ore/waste designation, visual identification of unoxidized waste is made by site geologists and compared to the mine block model. Waste blocks from the mine model that contain unoxidized waste are identified on the ore control maps and distinguished by ore control stakes in the pit. The tonnage of this material is tracked by WLMC geologists and the mine production reporting system.
13.8.2 | Shift Schedule |
Table 13-7 shows how the approximate number of shifts and hours per shift vary over the Life-of-Mine (LOM).
Table 13-7 Approximate Production Shift Schedule
13.8.3 | Manpower |
During production, mining operations require three crews operating on ten to twelve-hour rotating shifts. Mining crew manpower during the peak production years shall include a total of 42 equipment operators, 3 maintenance personnel and 7 salaried and 2 support personnel.
13.8.4 | Blasthole Drilling |
Blasthole drilling is done with track-mounted blasthole drills. Blasthole drilling in and around the ore zones is being performed with a Caterpillar MD5150 top hammer drill. It is assumed that the MD5150 shall continue drill all of the ore and an equivalent tonnage of waste material surrounding that ore with 14 cm (5.5 in) diameter holes in the Isabella Pearl mining area. This additional waste is included in the estimate as the ore and waste boundaries are more difficult to define. A second MD5150 shall be outfitted to drill a 14 cm (5.5 in) hole if needed.
Waste drilling with the MD5150 is planned with a 4.6 m (15 ft) 4.6 m (15 ft) pattern on the 6.1 m (20 ft) bench with 1.2 m (4 ft) of subdrilling. The hole diameter is 14 cm (5.5 in). Drilling is done with a 15 cm (6 in) downhole hammer on 14 cm (5.5 in) drill steel.
13.8.5 | Blasting |
A blasting contractor is responsible for loading the blastholes and initiating the blasts. The hole loading sequence starts by lowering a 0.45 or 0.91 kg (one or two-pound) booster (depending on hole size) attached to a non-electric blasting cap down the hole. The mine is dry and Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil (ANFO) are used as the primary blasting agent. Bulk ammonium nitrate prills are delivered to an on-site storage silo. A blasthole loading truck transports the prill to the shot pattern, mix the prill with fuel
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 118 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
oil (diesel) and a measured amount of powder is loaded into each hole. The remaining part of the hole is filled with drill cuttings or crushed rock (stemming) to control the blast energy and minimize fly rock. Once the holes are loaded, the lead lines to the blasting caps are tied together with a series of downhole and surface delays to control the blast.
To minimize operational delays, blasting occurs during the lunch break or between shifts.
The powder factor (pounds of explosives per short ton of rock) is 0.45 for waste drilled with the MD5150. When drilling the ore pattern, the MD5150 targets a 0.6 powder factor. The higher powder factor in ore is to maximize the gold recovery by achieving better fragmentation. Target size for blasted ore to achieve planned recovery is 80% finer than 15 cm (6 in).
In addition to loading the blastholes and initiating the blast, the blasting contractor supplies prill silos, explosive magazines, an ANFO mixing and loading truck, and a skid steer loader to stem the holes. The contractor also supplies inventory control for the blasting agents and supplies and be responsible for regulatory control of the blasting materials. Cost for these services was included in the economic analysis.
13.8.6 | Loading |
The primary waste loading unit is a Caterpillar 992K front-end loader or equivalent. The 992K is planned to be equipped with 16 yd3 bucket. A front-end loader was selected due to its versatility to handle multiple faces within a short period of time. The 992K is sized to load a 91-tonne (100-short ton) truck in five passes.
The primary ore loading unit is a Caterpillar 992K front-end loader with a 16 yd3 bucket. This loader is sized to load a 91-tonne (100-short ton) truck in five passes. Two Hitachi excavators (1200 and 850) serves as backup loader units or when ore is being mined concurrently from two areas. Due to its reach, it may require taking the bench down in two passes. A second 988K is used to feed the screen at the leach pad. This loader could also serve as a backup for the mining fleet.
13.8.7 | Hauling |
Primary waste haulage is performed with Caterpillar 777, 91-tonne (100-short ton), haul trucks. For the majority of the mine, five (5) 91 metric ton (100 ton) trucks are required.
Development waste, ore, and a portion of the waste surrounding the ore are hauled using Caterpillar 777 haul trucks.
The loading, hauling, dumping, delays and availability were calculated in Caterpillar’s Fleet Production and Cost Analysis (FPC) haulage toolkit.
13.8.8 | Support Equipment |
Major mining equipment is expected to include one Caterpillar D8 dozer, one Caterpillar D9 dozer, two Caterpillar 14M motor graders, two 769 Caterpillar water trucks, two lube trucks and two mechanic’s trucks.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 119 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
13.8.9 | Ancillary Mining Operations |
13.8.9.1 | Site Preparation |
Growth medium will be scalped from the site footprint, where growth medium occurs. It will be bulldozed into stockpiles where it can be loaded and trucked to designated areas for use in reclamation.
13.8.9.2 | Drainage Preparation |
WLMC facility design includes a system of stormwater diversion ditches to divert runoff around the crushing and process areas and into natural drainages. Stormwater diversion channels have been constructed to safely transport the peak flow from a 100-year/24-hour storm event.
The goal of the drainage and sediment control plan is to convey runoff from mine area and upstream undisturbed areas through the mine site in a manner that protects the site areas and prevents degradation of downstream water quality. The drainage and sediment control plan has been designed to require no maintenance through re-establishment and stabilization of natural drainages. All drainages crossed by haulage, exploration and vehicle access roads will be opened up during re-grading. The resulting channels will be of the same capacity as up and down-stream reaches, will be made non-erosive by the use of surface stabilization techniques (rip-rap) where necessary, and ultimately revegetated. Best Management Practices (BMPs) have been followed during construction and operation and shall continue during reclamation to minimize sedimentation from disturbed areas.
13.8.9.3 | Site Reclamation |
Reclamation of the major facilities on site shall be conducted using the mining fleet. Some opportunity for concurrent reclamation may be possible if doing so does not interfere with operations. Concurrent reclamation has been accounted for in the current production schedule.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 120 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
14 | Processing and Recovery Methods |
14.1 | Process Description Summary |
Metallurgical test work has validated that Isabella Pearl oxidized ores are amenable to gold and silver recovery by cyanidation. The most economically effective process has been identified as conventional heap leaching of crushed ore, and to a lesser extent ROM ore, followed by absorption/desorption recovery (ADR) and refining to produce doré bars. The estimated recovery of gold from all crushed ore is 81%. The estimated gold recovery of ROM ore previously placed on the heap leach is 60%.
The general layout consists of the heap leach pad area which covers about 114,000 m2 (1.5 million ft2) and provides containment for 3.1 million tonnes (3.4 million short tons) of ore. The leach pad is a modified valley fill with a double liner system. A berm ranging from 1 to 5 m (3.3 to 16.4 ft) has been constructed along the sides and downstream (south) edge of the pad. The ADR plant consists of five 2 m (7 ft) diameter vertical adsorption towers in series with a carbon screen on the barren discharge; a 2.7 tonne (3 short ton) carbon-stripping plant with a carbon conditioning and sizing screen; and barren and pregnant solution tanks. The ADR plant design flowrate is 88 liters per second (1,400 gpm). Electro-winning is done in a 150-ft3 electrolytic cell. Smelting is done in a T-200 melt furnace. Figure 14-1 shows a simplified schematic of the Isabella Pearl mine flowsheet.
The pad liner system consists of 15 cm (6 in) of prepared subgrade overlain by a geomembrane sandwiched clay liner (GCL) which in turn is covered by a 60-mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane. The heap distribution (leaching solution) system consists of two 1400 gpm pumps with variable speed controllers and a network of 15 cm (6 in), 8 cm (3 in) and 1.3 cm (½ in) piping connected to drip emitters. The ore is leached via emitters at a solution application rate of 0.005 gpm/ft2. The leachate flows by gravity through the heap and is gathered in collector piping and exits each side of the leach pad through 25.4 cm (10 in) solid HDPE pipes resting in double-lined exit notches (ditches).
The pregnant cyanide solution is pumped from the pregnant tank to a feed box in the carbon-in-column (CIC) circuit where it is contacted with activated carbon completing the extraction of the gold via carbon adsorption. The CIC circuit consists of five columns in a series. Solution from the last column overflows to the barren tank where liquid sodium cyanide, fresh water and anti-scalant is added on an as needed basis prior to the solution returning to the heap leach pad for additional leaching of the ore. The pregnant strip solution is electrolyzed at the on-site facility and the cathode sludge dried, blended with fluxes, and melted to produce doré bullion for shipment to a refiner.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 121 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 14-1 Simplified Schematic of Isabella Pearl Mine Flowsheet
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 122 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
14.2 | Plant Design and Equipment Characteristics |
14.2.1 | Primary Crushing and Fine Crushing |
The Isabella Pearl higher-grade ore above the 0.61 g/t Au cut-off is being crushed to P80 5/8”. This is accomplished with a two-stage portable crushing plant with a 250 tonne (276 short ton) per hour capacity.
The higher-grade ore is first be trucked from the open pit to a stockpile located close to the primary crushing circuit. A front-end loader then feeds the higher-grade ore to the crushing circuit. The ore is then be placed into a stationary grizzly located above the hopper that prevents oversize material from making its way into the crusher cavity. A 1.2 m (4 ft) x 6.1 m (20 ft) vibrating grizzly feeder draws ore into the jaw crusher. The minus 5 cm (2 in) grizzly feeder undersize material bypasses the crusher and combines with the crusher product on the crusher discharge belt conveyor.
Ore is crushed and screened with the final product 80 percent passing 1.6 cm (5/8 in) conveyed and stacked in a crushed ore stockpile or transported by a series of stacker conveyors to the heap leach pad. A series of several mobile, grasshopper-type conveyors are added or removed as required dependent upon the stacking location on the pad. The final conveyor is a radial-type mobile stacker that places ore in lifts of up to 8 m (26 ft) in height. Lime addition is at the first stacker conveyor by means of silo and screw feeder. All mechanical components of the crushing circuit are semi-mobile, which allows for a complete circuit relocation. Water sprays are utilized for dust suppression at the crusher feed hopper and at transfer points for the screen undersize material.
14.2.2 | Heap Leach Pad and Solution Ponds |
Detailed designs of the Isabella Pearl Heap Leach Pad were prepared under the Water Pollution Control Permit (WPCP) and was approved by the NDEP and BLM on June 23, 2017. The leach pad area covers about 114,000 m2 (1.2 million ft2) and provides containment for 3.1 million tonnes (3.4 million short tons) of ore. The leach pad is a modified valley fill with a double liner system. A berm ranging from 1 to 5 m (3.3 to 16.4 ft) has been constructed along the sides and downstream (south) edge of the pad.
The pad liner system consists of 15 cm (6 in) of prepared subgrade overlain by a geomembrane sandwiched clay liner (GCL) which in turn is covered by a 60-mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane. Leachate gathered in collector piping exits each side of the leach pad through 25 cm (10 in) solid HDPE pipes resting in double-lined exit notch (ditch). The primary 60-mil HDPE upper liner in the ditch has been welded to the leach pad primary liner. GCL installed for secondary containment beneath the leach pad overlaps the secondary liner of the exit notches by a minimum of 6 m (20 ft). Any seepage collected between the leach pad primary and secondary liners reports to the pregnant pond or the barren/stormwater pond via the pipe containment ditches. The heap design allows for direction of pregnant solution to the pregnant pond or from either the pregnant pond or the barren/stormwater pond to the barren tank or between ponds through the 0.9 m (3 ft) weir should the need arise. The heap distribution (leaching solution) system consists of two 600-1400 gpm pumps with variable speed controllers and a network of 15 cm (6 in), 8 cm (3 in) and 1 cm (½ in) piping connected to drip emitters.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 123 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The estimated recovery of gold from crushed material is 81%. The estimated gold recovery of ROM material placed on the leach heap is 60%.
The general arrangement of the heap leach pad and ponds is in Figure 14-2 (Note: view is rotated with north to left and scale is exaggerated 1:5).
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 124 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 14-2 General Arrangement for the Isabella Pearl Heap Leach Pad and Ponds.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 125 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
14.2.3 | Adsorption-Desorption-Recovery (ADR) Facility |
The pregnant cyanide solution passes through carbon adsorption columns and the barren solution is reconstituted with sodium cyanide and lime and returned to the heaps. The pregnant strip solution is electrolyzed at the on-site facility and the cathode sludge is dried, blended with fluxes, and melted to produce doré bullion for shipment to a refiner. The process plant and heaps at the Isabella Pearl mine are operated seven days per week and 24 hours daily.
The following process criteria were used for the design of the heaps and plant:
● | Adsorption plant design flowrate: 1,400 gpm |
● | Solution application rate: 0.005 gpm/ft2 using emitters |
● | Power: Diesel generators |
The plant consists of five 2 m (7 ft) diameter vertical adsorption towers in series with a carbon screen on the barren discharge; a 2.7 tonne (3 short ton) carbon-stripping plant with a carbon conditioning and sizing screen; and barren and pregnant solution tanks. Electro-winning is being done in a 150-ft3 electrolytic cell. Smelting is done in a T-200 melt furnace. The strip heater and the furnace are propane fired.
Scotia International of Nevada, Inc. (Scotia) designed and constructed the ADR plant for the Isabella Pearl mine. The ADR plant layout is illustrated on Figure 14-3.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 126 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 14-3 ADR Plant General Arrangement
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 127 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
14.2.4 | Major Process Equipment List |
The process equipment was selected and sized based on the process design criteria. Table 14-1 lists the major process equipment along with the number of units required and specifications.
Table 14-1 Major Process Equipment for the Isabella Pearl Mine
Equipment | Qty | Dimensions | hp | Manufacturer | Comment | |
Crushing/Screening/Stacking: | ||||||
Jaw Crusher | 1 | 25” x 50” | 150 | Telsmith | H2550 | |
Cone Crusher | 1 | 44” | 300 | Telsmith | T300 | |
Grizzly Feeder | 1 | 48” x 20’ | 50 | Telsmith | Portable | |
Vibrating Screen | 1 | 6’ x 20’ | 40 | Telsmith | Portable | |
Lime Silo | 1 | | | | | |
Grasshoppers | 15 | 30” x 125’ | 20 | Superior | Portable | |
Radial Stacker | 1 | 30” x 158’ | 77 | Superior | Portable | |
Control Room | 1 | 12’ x 40’ | | | Portable | |
Loader | 1 | 988 | | Caterpillar | | |
Dozer | 1 | D9 Dozer | | Caterpillar | | |
Leaching: | ||||||
Process Solution Pond Pump | 1 | 500-600 gpm | 25 | Flygt | | |
Barren/Stormwater Pond Pump | 1 | 500-600 gpm | 25 | Flygt | | |
Pregnant Solution Tank Pump | 1 | 1,400 gpm | 50 | | | |
Barren Solution Tank Pump | 2 | 1,300 gpm (each) | 125 | Birkley | | |
ADR Plant: | ||||||
Carbon -In-Column Circuit: | ||||||
Carbon Column | 5 | ¼ x 7’ dia. x 16’ ½” H w/Launder | | Scotia | 3 T Carbon Capacity | |
Carbon Safety Screen | 1 | 12’-3.5” x 3’-6.25” x 1’ | | Johnson | Static | |
Acid Wash & Regeneration: | ||||||
Acid Wash Vessel | 1 | 3 TM of carbon | | Scotia | | |
Regeneration Kiln | 1 | 29’-2-3/8” x 4’-1-5/8” x 6’4” | | Scotia | | |
Carbon Fines Filter Press | 1 | 185.13” x 56.85” x 64.55” | | Evoqua | | |
Carbon Sizing Screen | 1 | 15’ x 10’ | | Scotia | | |
Strip Circuit: | ||||||
Strip Vessel | 1 | 5’ x 12’ H | | Mark Steel | 3 T Carbon Capacity | |
Boiler | 1 | 70” x 76” 54” | | Lattner | | |
Heat Exchangers | 1 | 42” x 12.125” x 15.7” | | B&G | | |
Electrowinning Circuit: | ||||||
Electrowinning Tank | 1 | 1/4” x 3’9” x 12’ long x 3’2”H | | Scotia | | |
Rectifier | 1 | 3000 AMP | | Dynapower | | |
Filter Press | 1 | 127.55” x 34.64” x 51.38” | | Evoqua | | |
Smelting: | ||||||
Smelting Furnace | 1 | T200 | | Scotia | |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 128 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
14.2.5 | Assay Laboratory |
An assay facility capable of performing 100 atomic absorption spectrometry analyses (AAS) and 20 fire assay analyses per day have been installed at the Isabella Pearl mine office complex. The sample preparation area has drying ovens, crushing and pulverizing and splitting equipment and pulp weighing for up to 100 samples per day. The sample preparation area has a dedicated ventilation system for dust control. The fire assay section has one large electric furnace for fusion and one smaller furnace for cupellation. The fire assay section has a dedicated ventilation system. The AAS section has hot plates, centrifuges and an acid fuming hood for 3-acid digestion. A multi-element AAS machine has been installed for analyses of Au, Ag and other elements. The building also has metallurgical laboratory. The metallurgical laboratory has wet and dry screen sizing equipment, bottle rolling equipment, filtering equipment and equipment for up to six column tests. The ADR plant has an identical multi-element AAS machine for routine plant and heap solution assays. Samples requiring fire-assay check analyses for ore, waste and carbon are sent to an outside commercial lab.
The assay laboratory work schedule is five, ten-hour days. Fire assaying is done five days per week. AAS analysis and sample preparation works six days per week. The assay laboratory is staffed to provide five, ten-hour days for the personnel.
14.3 | Energy, Water, Material and Personnel Requirements |
14.3.1 | Power |
Power is supplied by three diesel-powered electric generators, one 1500 kW generator on-line, one 1500 kW generator on standby and one 200 kW generator on standby for the production wells to generate power for the well pumps if the need arises. The total connected force in the plant, including the crushers,
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 129 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
is approximately 1,567 hp. WLMC has installed 4160-volt direct burial power lines from the generator yard throughout the site and to the production wells.
14.3.2 | Water Supply |
The peak make-up water requirement for the mine is approximately 126 gpm. The water source for the mine is from two production wells located south of the mine site. Both wells are equipped with submersible pumps, pumping to a 757,100 to 946,400 liter (200,000 to 250,000 gallon) non-potable storage tank located near the contractor’s yard. The pumps are powered by a 1500 kW generator located near the ADR Plant.
14.3.3 | Major Reagents |
Reagents utilized at the Isabella Pearl mine processing facility include:
● | Hydrochloric acid |
● | Caustic soda |
● | Sodium cyanide |
● | Activated carbon |
● | Antiscalant |
● | Lime |
Liquid sodium cyanide, antiscalent, hydrochloric acid, and lime are received in bulk quantities and stored in tanks, totes or silos. The hydrochloric acid is delivered in totes, caustic soda delivered by truck and stored in a tank, the antiscalant shipped to the site in totes and the activated carbon arrives in super sacks. Mix systems are provided for the antiscalant and an attrition system is used for preparation of the activated carbon. Major reagent consumption is shown in Table 14-2.
Table 14-2 Major Reagent Consumption
Reagent | Use |
Sodium Cyanide | 0.75 kg/t (1.5 lb/T) |
Lime | 17.0 kg/t (6.0 lb/T) |
14.3.4 | Labor Requirements |
Labor requirements are divided into three sets: 1) 10 hours, 4 days per week, 2) 12 hours, 6 days per week, and 3) 12 hours, 7 days per week schedules. Management and technical labor are listed in Table 14-3. The total processing plant and analytical laboratory labor requirement is 31 workers.
Table 14-3 Labor Summary
Category | Roster | Per Shift | Total |
Management and Technical | 10 hr. / 4-day Schedule | 11 | 11 |
Hourly Scheduled Labor | 10 hr. / 4-day Schedule | 4 | 5 |
Hourly Scheduled Labor | 12 hr. / 6-day Schedule | 7 | 7 |
Hourly Scheduled Labor | 12 hr. / 7-day Schedule | 3 | 11 |
| | | |
| Totals | 25 | 34 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 130 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
15 | Infrastructure |
15.1 | Infrastructure Summary |
Access to most elements of the Isabella Pearl mine is provided by pre-existing gravel and paved roads. The main haulage road to the waste rock dump site and the ore preparation/heap leach site were designed to accommodate 91-tonne (100-short ton) capacity mine haulage trucks, requiring two-way traffic travel and safety berms.
The ADR plant, where gold and silver are stripped from pregnant solutions, are housed in a pre-engineered 21 m (69 ft) x 39 m (128.33 ft) structure consisting of steel ribs (struts) covered by insulation and tin siding, erected on a concrete slab. Two electric generators (plus fuel tanks) are in the ADR area. The west end of the ADR area is occupied by the ADR processing plant building. Pregnant solution and barren/stormwater ponds were designed to be near the center of the ADR area. The entire ADR area is enclosed by cyclone fencing.
An assay laboratory and preparation facilities are located are located east of the barren/stormwater pond. Nearby office trailers house on-site administrative staff including the general manager, mine, environmental and safety managers as well as accounting, engineering, geology, metallurgy, and surveying staff. Contractors utilize a site north of the ore preparation area on which they have placed their own shop. A septic system with a leach field services the ADR plant, laboratory, and offices. A second septic system services the ore preparation area, mine, and contractor’s shop. A pipeline with industrial water from a non-potable water storage tank services the ADR plant, laboratory, office, and contractor’s shop. Potable water for drinking is being supplied from bottles.
Power is supplied by three diesel-powered electric generators. One 1500 kW generator is on-line, one 1500 kW generator is on standby, and one 200 kW generator is on standby for the water production wells to generate power for the well pumps on an as-needed basis. The total connected electrical force in the plant, including the crushers, is approximately 1,567 hp. WLMC has installed 4,160-volt direct burial power lines from the generator yard throughout the site and to the production wells. Fuel for the generators is stored in two above-ground tanks on graded areas with HDPE-lined floors and berms for secondary containment to provide emergency capture of 110-percent of the largest fuel tank/vessel volume.
Industrial water is supplied from three production water wells. Production Well #2 (IPPW-2) was completed in September 2013 to a depth of 128 m (420 ft) and is upgradient from both the heap leach and open pit. Production Well #1 (IPPW-1) was installed in October 2016 to a depth of 396 m (1,300 ft) and is located south of the processing facility. A third production water well (Well #3) was installed in 2019, about 400 meters southwest of Well #1. Permits for the WLMC production water wells and a maximum of 484-acre feet of water annually (300 gpm 24/7) have been issued by the Nevada State Engineer. A 757,000 to 946,250 liter (200,000 to 250,000 gallon) non-potable water tank is located near contractor’s yard. The tank is approximately 13.4 m (44 ft) in diameter and 6.1 m (20 ft) high.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 131 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Specifications for the mine infrastructure are provided in Table 15-1. Figure 15-1 shows the general site arrangement layout of the facilities including location of the ADR plant to the heap leach pad, pit and waste dumps, water well locations, water supply line, and references to infrastructure items in Table 15-1.
Table 15-1 Infrastructure Items and Specifications
Mine Component | Acres Existing | Acres Proposed | Total Acres |
Roads | 27.4 | 34.4 | 61.8 |
Leach Pad, Mine Pits, Waste Rock Dump, Borrows and Stockpiles | 24.1 | 172.9 | 197 |
Yards | 2.6 | 23.8 | 26.4 |
Sediment & Drainage Control | 0 | 7.7 | 7.7 |
Grand Total | 54.1 | 238.8 | 292.9 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 132 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 15-1 : General Site Arrangement
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 133 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
16 | Market Studies |
16.1 | Contracts and Status |
A market study for the gold and silver products was not undertaken for this technical report. Gold and silver are publicly traded, and the price estimate for this report is based on the analysis by WLMC and available consensus 2022 – 2024 average pricing (CIBC, 2021). WLMC has determined that the best prices to use for Isabella Pearl mine planning is $1,738 per ounce of gold and $23.22 per ounce of silver. Gold and silver are the only metals for which WLMC is paid pursuant to refining contracts. Given the relatively short mine life and that the operation is already in production, Gustavson believes that this price correctly demonstrates the value of the project.
This study assumes a static price curve for the gold market price. In the economic evaluations, the gold price was set at $1,738/oz based on the consensus 2022 – 2024 average pricing (CIBC, 2021). This price was lower than the London PM Fix Price of $1,806 on December 31, 2021, the effective date of this mineral resource and reserve estimate.
Terms for an off-take and smelting agreement are based on refinery agreements established with highly respected, internationally accredited, precious metals refineries and mints located throughout the world. For the Isabella Pearl mine, the delivery terms, penalties and payment schedule are generally described as follows:
● | Upon pick up of the doré bars by the transport service, WLMC provides to refiner shipping documents with estimated quantities of contained gold and silver in the bars. Risk of loss transfers upon pick up at the mine site. |
● | Refiner provides provisional payments to WLMC on the majority of the ounces, generally within 2 days of shipment, and notifies WLMC of the total ounces available for early settlement. |
● | WLMC and refiner then agree on a transaction price for those ounces at the current spot price. The remaining ounces are not priced until final weights and assays are agreed upon, which is usually within 2 weeks from shipment. |
● | Once final content of gold and silver are agreed upon, refiner and WLMC price the ounces remaining at the current spot price. Contractual deductions are immaterial and WLMC is paid for nearly 100% of the agreed content of the bars. |
● | Penalties due to any deleterious elements have not been levied in the past and are not expected in the future. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 134 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
17 | Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact |
17.1 | Environmental Liabilities and Permitting |
17.1.1 | Environmental Liabilities |
Site investigations by Great Basin Ecology, Inc. (GBE), Elko, Nevada, in June 2009 and 2017 (Back, 2009; GBE, 2017) did not indicate any environmental liabilities or the presence of endangered plants or species.
Previous mining at the Isabella Pearl site was conducted in 1978 by a local resident, Mr. Joe Morris. A small heap leach facility was constructed with approximately 1,361 tonnes (1,500 short tons) of crushed material. All existing leach material and contaminated subgrade soil from the Joe Morris Heap Leach Pad has been placed on the WLMC heap leach pad as part of the 45.7 cm (18 in) of liner cover. As of 1 October 2019, the Final Closure Report of the Joe Morris Heap Leach was approved by the State of Nevada and the BLM, with all reclamation actions successfully performed by WLMC. The successful closure of the Joe Morris Heap Leach removed the facility as an environmental liability for WLMC.
WLMC has conducted mineral exploration activities at the Isabella Pearl site and is currently liable for reclamation of the associated disturbances. Liabilities associated with the exploration activities have been incorporated into the Plan of Operations and approved by both the BLM and the State of Nevada.
17.1.2 | Required Permits and Status |
The Isabella Pearl mine is located approximately 8.4 km (5.2 mi) northwest of the town of Luning, at the west foot of the Gabbs Valley Range located in Mineral County, Nevada. The location and current land ownership position (i.e., public land ownership) mean that the mine is being held to permitting requirements that are determined to be necessary by Mineral County, the State of Nevada, and the U.S. Department of the Interior BLM, Stillwater District Office, Stillwater Field Office.
To date, all of the primary permits for operation have been acquired. This includes the BLM 43 CFR § 3809 POO and State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), NDEP, BMRR NAC 519A Reclamation Permit application. The BLM has deemed the POO complete and authorized the NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) of the operations. The NEPA analysis was completed and WLMC received a Record of Decision (ROD) on May 15, 2018.
In 2021, WLMC submitted a POO Modification for the expansion of the existing heap leach facilities, open pit mine plan, and revised sulfide waste stockpile area. In August 2021 the BLM issued a Decision of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) for the POO Modification. As of September 2021, all necessary permit approvals were obtained from the BLM, the State of Nevada, and Mineral County in relation to the POO Modification.
Table 17-1 below lists the environmental permits that are applicable to the Isabella Pearl mine.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 135 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The newly approved changes were found to not result in a divergence of any exploration, mining, or processing operations, nor will the newly approved changes result in mining of ore and waste divergent from what has already been characterized. The newly approved changes would not result in a significant increase in proposed disturbance, nor would result in a significant increase in the overall area of the Plan Boundary. Therefore, the information, conclusions, studies, etc. contained within the Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan for the Isabella Pearl Project, that was compiled by Welsh Hagen on behalf of the Company in 2018, as well as subsequent studies that have been performed, are still relevant to the actions recently approved.
Table 17-1 : Permits, Licenses, and Issuing Authorities for the Isabella Pearl Mine
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 136 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Surface Area Disturbance Permit | Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP)/Bureau of Air Pollution Control (BAPC) | Regulates airborne emissions from surface disturbance activities | Not necessary (covered under Class II) |
Class II Air Quality Operating Permit | NDEP/BAPC | Regulates project air emissions from stationary sources | Completed; in good standing |
Mercury Operating Permit to Construct | NDEP/BAPC | Program to achieve mercury reduction via add-on control technologies | Completed; in good standing |
Class 1 Air Quality Operating Permit to Construct | NDEP/BAPC | Program to achieve mercury reduction via add-on control technologies | Completed; in good standing |
Mining Reclamation Permit | NDEP/Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation (BMRR) | Reclamation of surface disturbance due to mining and mineral processing; includes financial assurance requirements | Completed; in good standing |
Mineral Exploration Hole Plugging Permit or Waiver | Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR) | Prevents degradation of waters of the State | Completed; in good standing |
State Groundwater Permit | NDEP/BMRR | Prevents degradation of waters of the State from surface disposal, septic systems, mound septic systems, unlined ponds, and overland flow | Not necessary (covered under WPCP) |
Water Pollution Control Permit (WPCP) | NDEP/BMRR | Prevent degradation of waters of the state from mining, establishes minimum facility design and containment requirements | Completed; in good standing |
Approval to operate a Solid Waste System | NDEP/Bureau of Waste Management (BWM) | Authorization to operate an on-site landfill | NOT REQUIRED. No Solid Waste Systems are for operation. |
Hazardous Waste Management Permit | NDEP/BWM | Management and recycling of hazardous wastes | Completed; in good standing |
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit | NDEP/Bureau of Water Pollution Control (BWPC) | Management of site discharges | NOT REQUIRED. No point source discharges by operation. |
General Stormwater Discharge Permit | NDEP/BWPC | General permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from metals mining activities | Completed; in good standing |
Permit to Appropriate Water/Change Point of Diversion | NDWR | Water rights appropriation | Completed; in good standing |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 137 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Permit to Construct a Dam | NDWR | Regulate impoundment higher than 20 ft or impounding more than 20 acre-feet | NOT REQUIRED. No process water ponds will exceed the 20/20 height or impoundment thresholds. |
Potable Water System Permit | Nevada Bureau of Safe Drinking Water | Water system for drinking water and other domestic uses (e.g., lavatories) | Ongoing, with first year of testing complete |
Septic Treatment Permit Sewage Disposal System Permit | NDEP/Bureau of Water Pollution Control | Design, operation, and monitoring of septic and sewage disposal systems | Completed; in good standing |
Dredging Permit | Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) | Protection of Nevada waterways | NOT REQUIRED. No dredging. |
Industrial Artificial Pond Permit | NDOW | Regulate artificial bodies of water containing chemicals that threaten wildlife | Completed; in good standing |
Wildlife Protection Permit | NDOW | Stream and watershed wildlife habitat protection | NOT REQUIRED. No stream or watershed modification. |
Hazardous Materials Permit | Nevada Fire Marshall | Store a hazardous material in excess of the amount set forth in the International Fire Code, 2006 | Completed; in good standing |
License for Radioactive Material | Nevada State Health Division, Radiological Health Section | Radioactive material licensing | NOT REQUIRED. No radioactive equipment is used |
Encroachment Permit | Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) | Permits for permanent installations within State rights-of-way and in areas maintained by the State | NOT REQUIRED. No installations within State rights-of-way by operations. |
Temporary Permit to Work in Waterways | NDEP/BWPC | Covers temporary working or routine maintenance in surface waters of the State, such as channel clearing and minor repairs to intake structures. | NOT REQUIRED. No work in waterways by operations. |
Local Permits for Mineral County | |||
Building Permits Mineral County Building Planning Department | Mineral County Building Planning Department | Ensure compliance with local building standards/requirements | Completed; in good standing |
Special Use Permit | Mineral County Building Planning Department | Provided as necessary under applicable zoning ordinances | Completed; in good standing |
County Road Use and Maintenance Permit/Agreement | Mineral County Building Planning Department | Use and maintenance of county roads | NOT REQUIRED. WLMC will maintain their own roads. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 138 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
17.1.3 | Federal Permitting |
Federal permits and authorizations are required for mining operations located on public land administered by a federal land management agency, including, but not limited to the BLM, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Forest Service, and the National Parks Service. In the case of Isabella Pearl, the mine is located on public lands administered by the BLM. As such, the operation requires all of the identified federal permits, the most important of which are approvals of the 43 CFR § 3809 POO and its subsequent NEPA analyses. WLMC submitted the POO and Reclamation Permit application and the NEPA analysis was completed, and a ROD was issued on May 15, 2018. A DNA was issued to WLMC for the POO Modification in 2021.
WLMC has acquired the following Federal Permits and Registrations:
● | EPA Hazardous Waste #NVR000092916 (BWM) |
● | Explosive Permit #9-NV-009-20-8K-00321 (Ledcor CMI Inc. contract mining) |
● | POO and Reclamation Plan #NVN86663 (BLM) |
17.1.3.1 | BLM Exploration Notice of Intent (NOI) |
Upon completion of the POO and issuance of the ROD by the BLM, the existing exploration permit that was within the mine plan boundary was closed. The reclamation cost estimated for surface disturbance associated with ongoing exploration within the mine plan boundary is covered by the bond for the Isabella Pearl mine. This allows WLMC to continue its exploration activities within the mine plan boundary while active mining is in progress.
Surface disturbance associated with proposed exploration drilling to be conducted outside the mine plan boundary (the permitted mine area) is currently authorized under a separate BLM Notice of Intent, a summary of which, including the obligated bond amounts for reclamation, is provided in Table 17-2.
Table 17-2 : BLM Notice of Intent Summary for the Isabella Pearl Mine
Area | Serial | Name | Total | Bond Amount |
Scarlet Prospect | NVN-98794 | FGC Reclamation Cost Estimate | 4.30 | $17,897 |
| Total | 4.30 | $17,897 |
17.1.4 | State Permitting |
The State of Nevada requires operational mining permits regardless of land status of the mine (i.e., private, or public). The following are the state permits that are required for the Isabella Pearl mine:
● | Reclamation Permit #0387 (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | Hazardous Waste Generator #NVR000092916 (NDEP/BWM) |
● | Water Pollution Control Permit #NEV2009102 (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | Emergency Release, Response, and Contingency Plan (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan (NDEP/BMRR) |
● | National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit #NVG201000 (NDEP/BWPC) |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 139 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | General Stormwater Permit #NVR300000 MSW-43292 (NDEP/BWPC) |
● | Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (NDEP/BWPC) |
● | Water Rights – #83484, 82498, 79096 and 83485 (changed to 89001T) (DCNR/NDWR); Permits to change the point of diversion and place of use of the water rights have been approved, for groundwater production wells |
● | Air Quality Class II Operating Permit #AP-1041-3853 (NDEP/BAPC) |
● | Air Quality Mercury Permit to Construct #AP-1041-3895 (NDEP/BAPC) |
● | Air Quality Class I Operating Permit to Construct #AP-1041-3897 (NDEP/BAPC) |
● | Industrial Artificial Pond Permit #467428 (NDOW) |
● | Bureau of Safe Drinking Water Public Water Source Permit NV0001178 |
The State of Nevada has issued the above permits, which are all in good standing as of December 31, 2021.
17.1.5 | Local Permitting |
WLMC has obtained the necessary Building Permits and a Special Use Permit issued by Mineral County. These permits authorized WLMC to construct the buildings located at the Isabella Pearl mine.
The following are the Mineral County permits that are required for the Isabella Pearl mine:
● | Mineral County Business License #17288 (Mineral County Sheriff’s Office) |
● | Special Use Permit #165957 (Mineral County Planning Commission) |
● | Septic Permit #7905 and 7906 (Mineral County Building Department) |
● | ADR Building Permit #5891 (Mineral County Fire Marshall) |
● | Office Building Permit #7888 (Mineral County Fire Marshall) |
● | Water Tank Building Permit #7921 (Mineral County Fire Marshall) |
The Special Use Permit was approved when the ROD was issued by BLM in May 2018. Mineral County has issued the remaining permits, which are all in good standing as of December 31, 2021.
17.2 | Environmental Study Results |
The reader is referred to earlier reports on mineral resources and reserves for a more detailed description of environmental study results at the Isabella Pearl mine (Brown et al., 2018, 2021). Specific topics covered in earlier reports included:
● | Mine Waste Characterization and Management |
● | Waste Rock Management Plan |
● | Groundwater Characterization |
o | Groundwater Quality |
● | Surface Water Characterization |
● | Cultural Resources Inventory |
o | Native American Religious Concerns |
● | Biological Resources Inventory |
o | Vegetation |
o | Mammals |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 140 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
o | Reptiles |
o | Migratory Birds |
o | Sensitive Species |
◾ | BLM |
◾ | State of Nevada |
17.3 | Environmental Issues |
Following submission by TXAU of the plan of operations in 2010, public scoping was conducted from March 15 through April 15, 2011. In five letters and four telephone calls received by the BLM, the following issues and concerns were identified:
● | Wildlife—Potential disturbance of habitat for mule deer, pronghorn antelope, and desert bighorn sheep; |
● | Special status species—Proximity of disturbance to a known prairie falcon nest; |
● | Springs—The impact of mining on springs and associated wildlife; |
● | Public access and vested rights-of-way—The status of public access to surrounding areas for recreation; |
● | Level of NEPA analysis—What criteria were used to determine that the preparation of an EA would be appropriate, as opposed to a full environmental impact statement; |
● | Transportation of ore—Plans to evaluate the impacts of the transportation of ore on off-site facilities; |
● | Water resources—Waste and ore rock characterization and potential impacts on Waters of the United States; |
● | Cultural resources—Request for complete examination of the site for archaeological and cultural resources; |
● | Water rights—Two claims of vested water rights for stock water use in the area; and |
● | Recreation—Requests by various off-road race organizers to control cross traffic during race day. |
Issues originally identified from the agency comments were concern for water quality, wildlife (including special status species), habitat, recreation, nearby spring monitoring, and quantity and quality reporting. Each of these concerns has been addressed or mitigated by the design of the project, or the implementation of Operator Committed Environmental Protection Measures and Practices (Section 2.5 of the Isabella Pearl mine POO (Welsh Hagen, 2018).
17.4 | Operating and Post Closure Requirements and Plans |
As part of both the Nevada Water Pollution Control Permit (WPCP) and the BLM POO, WLMC has submitted a detailed plan for monitoring designed to demonstrate compliance with the approved POO and other Federal or State environmental laws and regulations, to provide early detection of potential problems, and to supply information that will assist in directing corrective actions, should they become necessary. The plan includes discussion on water quality in the area; monitoring locations, analytical profiles, and sampling/reporting frequency. Examples of monitoring programs which may be necessary include surface and ground-water quality and quantity, air quality, revegetation, stability, noise levels, and wildlife mortality.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 141 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The BMRR also requires a process fluid management plan as part of the WPCP. This plan describes the management of process fluids, including the methods to be used for the monitoring and controlling of all process fluids. The plan also provides a description of the means to evaluate the conditions in the fluid management system, to be able to quantify the available storage capacity for meteoric waters and to define when and to what extent the designed containment capacity may been exceeded. The management of non-process (non-contact) stormwater around and between process facilities is a necessary part of the Nevada General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity from metals Mining Activities (NVR300000) and is typically detailed in the site-wide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). These documents were prepared in conjunction with the WPCP.
WLMC has the following plans in place: environmental management plan, waste rock management plan, weed management plan, water management plan, emergency response plan, spill prevention, control and counter measure plan, spring monitoring plan, groundwater monitoring plan and stormwater pollution prevention plan.
17.5 | Post-Performance or Reclamation Bonds |
The Isabella Pearl mine’s location and current land ownership mean that the mine operations are subject to reclamation financial surety requirements set by the state and federal agencies. Any operator who conducts mining operations in the State of Nevada under an approved BLM POO and/or state Reclamation Permit must file a surety with the NDEP-BMRR or federal land management agency, as applicable, to ensure that reclamation will be completed on privately owned and federal land. The surety may either be: a trust fund; a bond; an irrevocable letter of credit; insurance; a corporate guarantee; or any combination thereof. The existing reclamation bond(s) associated with the exploration Notice-of-Intent (NOI) have been incorporated into the overall mine reclamation bond as part of the final authorization process. The surety will be released when all of the requirements of the permit have been fulfilled, including, but not limited to reclamation of disturbances, regrading of lands, and revegetation, as defined by the approved reclamation plan.
17.5.1 | Mine Closure Plan |
Both the BLM’s 43 CFR § 3809.401(b)(3) and State of Nevada’s mining regulations (NAC 519A et seq.) require closure and reclamation of mining and mineral development projects in the State of Nevada. In addition, any operator who conducts mining operations under an approved BLM POO or State Reclamation Permit must furnish a bond in an amount sufficient for stabilizing and reclaiming all areas disturbed by the operations.
After operations cease, residual process solution in the heap leach pad will be recirculated until the rate of flow from these facilities can be passively managed through evaporation from the lined process ponds or a combination of evaporation and infiltration (depending on final water quality). The waste rock dump will be re-graded and revegetated, pursuant to the approved reclamation plan. Buildings and facilities not identified for a post-mining use will be removed from the site during the salvage and site demolition phase. Reclamation and closure activities may be conducted concurrently, to the extent practical, to reduce the overall reclamation and closure costs, minimize environmental liabilities, and limit bond exposure.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 142 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The revegetation release criteria for reclaimed areas are presented in the Guidelines for Successful Revegetation for the NDEP, BLM, and U.S.D.A. Forest Service (BLM, 1998). The revegetation goal is to achieve the permitted plant cover as soon as possible.
17.5.2 | Reclamation Measures During Operations and Mine Closure |
In general, the reclamation plan outlined in the Isabella Pearl mine POO and submitted to both the BLM and the NDEP includes a description of the equipment, devices, and practices that WLMC proposes to use including, where applicable, plans for:
i. | Drill hole plugging and abandonment; |
ii. | Regrading and reshaping; |
iii. | Mine reclamation, including information on pit backfilling that details economic, environmental, and safety factors; |
iv. | Riparian mitigation; |
v. | Wildlife habitat rehabilitation; |
vi. | Topsoil handling; |
vii. | Revegetation; |
viii. | Isolation and control of acid forming, toxic, or deleterious materials; |
ix. | Removal or stabilization of buildings, structures, and support facilities; and |
x. | Post-closure management. |
In addition, the WPCP includes a plan for the permanent closure of the facility which describes the procedures, methods and schedule for stabilizing spent process materials. The plan includes:
a. | Procedures for characterizing spent process materials as they are generated; and |
b. | The procedures to stabilize all process components with an emphasis on stabilizing spent process materials and the estimated cost for the procedures. |
17.5.3 | Closure Monitoring |
Monitoring the mine facilities after closure will ensure continued compliance with reclamation requirements and preservation of the State and Federal natural resources. Applicable monitoring programs may include, and are not limited to, the following:
● | Surface water and groundwater, quality, and quantity, |
● | Revegetation monitoring, and |
● | Slope stability for reclaimed mine facilities. |
Long-term environmental monitoring of facilities like the heap leach pad and waste rock disposal areas is not anticipated after closure and reclamation are completed.
17.5.4 | Reclamation and Closure Cost Estimate |
Conceptual reclamation and closure methods were used to evaluate the various components of the mine to estimate final closure costs. Version 1.4.1.017b of the Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator (SRCE) was used to prepare this estimate. The SRCE uses first principles methods to estimate quantities, productivities and work hours required for various closure tasks based on inputs from the user. The physical layout, geometry and dimensions of the mine components were based on the current understanding of the site plan and facilities layout. These included current designs for the main mine components including the open pit(s), infrastructure, waste rock dumps, haul and access roads, heap leach pad, utilities, and process ponds. Equipment and labor costs were conservatively estimated using State and BLM-approved costs.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 143 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
The costs associated with final reclamation and closure of the Isabella Pearl mine were updated during the 2021 POO Modification. The new cost associated with the final reclamation and closure therefore is estimated to be $12 million. This total is an undiscounted cost to reclaim and close the facilities associated with the mining and processing project.
17.5.5 | 2021 Estimate of Current Closure Costs |
WLMC maintains a quarterly review of its environmental obligations as well as any updates of information related to any new regulations.
WLMC considers two levels of care in preparation of its mine closure plan for the possible future abandonment of the Isabella Pearl mine. In compliance with environmental obligations, WLMC considers two levels of care:
● | Works and actions that are specifically identified in the current environmental regulations, or in case of modifications or new regulations arising and, |
● | The terms and conditions listed in the permissions, registers, or certificates, as established in the authorization in terms of environmental impact and although not specifically identified in any order, are the result of case-specific analysis. |
A Mine Closure Plan and Reclamation Budget has been prepared FGC based on Nevada Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator and Cost Data File provided by BLM to calculate reclamation bonding requirements for Isabella Pearl mine.
The mine closure and reclamation cost estimate for the Isabella Pearl Mine as of December 31, 2021, is presented in Table 17-3.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 144 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 17-3 : Mine Closure and Reclamation Cost Summary for the Isabella Pearl Mine as of December 31, 2021
Concept | Labor | Equipment | Materials | Total |
Earthwork/Recontouring | $943,272 | $2,673,376 | $20,388 | $3,637,036 |
Revegetation/Stabilization | $49,524 | $17,694 | $113,273 | $180,491 |
Detoxification/Water Treatment/Waste Disposal | $1,612,001 | $1,735,937 | $467,336 | $3,815,274 |
Structure, Equipment Removal, and Miscellaneous | $261,723 | $212,290 | $138,323 | $612,336 |
Monitoring | $90,313 | $91,951 | $133,354 | $315,618 |
Construction Management and Support | $242,910 | $181,468 | | $424,378 |
Subtotal | $3,199,743 | $4,912,716 | $872,674 | $8,985,133 |
Indirect Costs | $3,169,788 | |||
GRAND TOTAL | $12,154,921 |
Source: WLMC_July2021_SRCE_Version_1_4_1_017b_(rev2) (WLMC,2021)
17.6 | Social and Community |
Hawthorne, which is approximately 40 km (25 mi) west of the mine, has a population of approximately 3,192 (Nevada State Demographer, 2020). It has sufficient resources to provide general amenities, housing, and services. It is the home of the Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant, which provides much of the employment in the area.
The small towns of Luning, about 10 km (6 mi), and Mina about 24 km (15 mi), are located to the south of the mine area. The population estimate of Luning is 98 and Mina is 179 (Nevada State Demographer, 2020). The towns provide minimal services and amenities.
Mineral County’s estimated population on April 1, 2020, was 4,554 (US Census Bureau, 2021). On July 1, 2019, there were 2,842 housing units in Mineral County. In November 2021, the Mineral County labor force was 2,038 individuals, with an unemployment rate of 2.6 percent (Nevada Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation, 2021).
17.7 | Other Significant Factors and Risks |
Potential factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform work on the property could include:
● | Unidentified cultural resources |
Considerable effort has been expended on conducting surface inventories within the Isabella Pearl mine boundary. For the most part, these surveys have focused on surface features and artifacts. Given the number of cultural and archeological resources in the region, it is possible for subsurface discoveries to be made during construction of the mine facilities. Such a discovery would require mitigation that could impact the mine.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 145 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
17.8 | Adequacy of Plans to Address any Issues |
The town of Hawthorne is within easy driving distance of the mine property and has basic amenities, medical services, housing, apartments, commercial and office space for rent and for sale, and lots for sale. The residents of Hawthorne comprise an experienced work force with historical and recent ties to mining operations in Nevada. This location already provides living areas for many employees.
There are no known social or community issues that materially impact on WLMC’s ability to continue extracting mineral resources at the Isabella Pearl mine. Identified socioeconomic issues (employment, payroll, services and supply purchases, and tax) are anticipated to remain positive.
17.9 | Commitments to Local Procurement or Hiring |
WLMC is committed to both local procurement and hiring. Under its Equal Opportunity Policy, WLMC will also recruit, hire, train, promote and compensate applicants and employees without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, age, disability, veteran status, gender, sexual affiliation or any other protected status as defined under applicable federal and state laws. WLMC will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with a disability in accordance with applicable law. WLMC will also make reasonable accommodations for religious practices as required by law. Accommodations will be provided if they are reasonable, necessary and do not create a safety hazard, or impose an undue hardship on operations.
WLMC’s growth can only be met through the commitment and development of its employees. A major objective is teamwork – all employees working together to discover, mine and process our mineral resources in a safe, environmentally sound and efficient manner for the benefit of all. Safety is of the upmost importance and priority of WLMC, followed by care for the environment, care and maintenance for equipment and then production and cost goals.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 146 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
18 | Capital and Operating Costs |
WLMC has provided an estimate of capital and operating costs in this report. The support for capital and operating costs are based on realized costs, quotations and estimates in 2021 dollars. No inflation factors have been used in the economic projections.
18.1 | Life-Of-Mine Capital Costs |
A summary of total estimated capital expenditures for the Isabella Pearl mine is presented in Table 18-1. The capital costs are based on vendor and specialist quotations. Additional contingencies have been applied to these estimates for omissions. Total estimated LOM capital expenditures are US$ 2.475 million.
Table 18-1 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Capital Cost Summary
18.2 | Life-Of-Mine Operating Costs |
Mining costs are based on actual costs derived from a Nevada mining contractor contracted by WLMC at the Isabella Pearl mine. These costs comprise ore and waste drilling and blasting, loading, and hauling and all the associated site maintenance including pits, roads, stockpiles, dumps, and storm water controls.
Processing costs are based on actual processing costs including but not limited to reagent consumption and current prices for wear and replacement parts.
Current supervisory and administrative support staff numbers are sufficient to efficiently handle the administrative, technical and management functions required for the mining operation. Provisions for training, and regulatory mandated safety functions are also included.
The unit operating costs are based on total mined material of 4.4 million tonnes (4.8 million short tons) of which 3.5 million tonnes (3.8 million short tons) is waste material and 0.9 million tonnes (1.0 million short tons) is ore.
The Isabella Pearl Mine LOM Operating Cash Costs per Tonne Processed is estimated at US$44.13 per tonne. This is based on a total ore processed of 0.9 million tonnes (1.0 million short tons). The estimated remaining mine life is 3 years, with continued gold production from the leach pad for a 4th year.
Isabella Pearl Mine LOM Operating Cash Costs per Tonne Processed are presented in Table 18-2.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 147 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 18-2 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Operating Cash Cost per Tonne Processed
Description | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | TOTAL |
Mining | $20.36 | $2.72 | $- | - | $11.10 |
Processing | $10.76 | $10.87 | $19.66 | - | $12.38 |
Energy | $3.18 | $3.52 | $13.01 | - | $4.83 |
G&A Mine Site | $6.63 | $7.33 | $27.11 | - | $10.07 |
Cash Cost of Production | $40.93 | $24.45 | $59.79 | - | $38.38 |
Change Inventory | $- | $- | $- | - | $- |
Cash Cost / Tonne Processed | $40.93 | $24.45 | $59.79 | - | $38.38 |
Carbon / Dore Transport | $0.12 | $0.13 | $0.45 | - | $0.17 |
Other Costs / Expenses | $- | $- | $- | - | $- |
TOTAL CASH COST OF SALE | $41.05 | $24.58 | $60.23 | - | $38.56 |
Royalties | $2.93 | $3.24 | $19.17 | - | $4.60 |
Refining & Treatment Charges | $0.09 | $0.10 | $0.60 | - | $0.14 |
Excise Tax | $0.57 | $0.63 | $3.74 | - | $0.83 |
CASH COST / TONNE PROCESSED | $44.64 | $28.55 | $83.74 | - | $44.13 |
Excise tax is levied based on revenue over $20 million. The excise tax calculations are expressed in costs per tonne processed. The Qualified Persons note that the amount of the excise tax on a per tonne basis is different in subsequent years during the Life-of-Mine due to the lower amount of tonnes processed year-to-year (shown below). This is because mining has largely ceased, yet gold production revenue continues from the heap leach. In other words, although the tonnes and ounces processed are variable, the gold production revenue from the heap leach remains nearly constant.
Tonnes Processed (from Table 13.6):
2022 – 660,000 tonnes
2023 – 596,889 tonnes
2024 – 100,860 tonnes
Isabella Pearl Mine LOM Operating Cash Cost per gold ounce sold are presented in Table 18-3.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 148 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 18-3 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Operating Cash Cost per Ounce Sold
Description | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | TOTAL |
Mining | $ | 335.90 | $ | 40.57 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 116.61 |
Processing | $ | 177.43 | $ | 161.91 | $ | 49.56 | $ | 136.55 | $ | 130.13 |
Energy | $ | 52.47 | $ | 52.38 | $ | 32.79 | $ | 115.55 | $ | 50.78 |
G&A Mine Site | $ | 109.34 | $ | 109.15 | $ | 68.32 | $ | 240.79 | $ | 105.82 |
Cash Cost of Production | $ | 675.14 | $ | 364.02 | $ | 150.67 | $ | 492.89 | $ | 403.34 |
Change Inventory | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
Cash Cost of Sale per Au Oz. | $ | 675.14 | $ | 364.02 | $ | 150.67 | $ | 492.89 | $ | 403.34 |
Carbon / Dore Transport | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 3.96 | $ | 1.83 |
Other Costs / Expenses | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
TOTAL CASH COST / AU OZ. | $ | 677.09 | $ | 365.96 | $ | 151.79 | $ | 496.85 | $ | 405.18 |
Royalties | $ | 48.31 | $ | 48.31 | $ | 48.31 | $ | 48.31 | $ | 48.31 |
Refining & Treatment Charges | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 |
Excise Tax | $ | 9.43 | $ | 9.43 | $ | 9.43 | $ | 0 | $ | 8.77 |
CASH COST | $ | 736.32 | $ | 425.20 | $ | 211.03 | $ | 546.66 | $ | 463.75 |
Exploration Sustaining | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
Capex - Development | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
Capex Sustaining | $ | 34.05 | $ | 14.90 | $ | 7.15 | $ | 25.19 | $ | 19.15 |
CAPEX COST | $ | 34.05 | $ | 14.90 | $ | 7.15 | $ | 25.19 | $ | 19.15 |
| | | | $ | - | | ||||
ALL IN CASH COST / AU OZ. | $ | 770.37 | $ | 440.10 | $ | 218.17 | $ | 571.84 | $ | 482.90 |
18.3 | Accuracy of Cost Estimate |
Gustavson has observed the operation and compared the costs and operating parameters to similar projects. We have reviewed the historical operating costs and find them reasonable. The mine has a relatively short remaining lifetime, and the commodity prices, operating costs, and mine operations and safety parameters are not expected to have a material change in that period.
Capital and operating costs are based on a production budget and realized costs to date and are judged to be within 5% accuracy.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 149 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
19 | Economic Analysis |
19.1 | Annual Production and Cash Flow Forecasts |
The Isabella Pearl mine will have a 3-year life given the mineral reserves described in this report. The financial results of this report have been prepared on an annual basis. Capital and operating costs are based on realized costs, quotations and estimates in 2021 dollars. No inflation factors have been used in the economic projections. The analysis assumes static conditions for the gold market price over the remaining mine life. The gold and silver prices were set at $1,738/oz and $23.22/oz, respectively. These prices are based on the consensus 2022-2024 average prices (CIBC, 2021).
This economic analysis is a post-tax evaluation and is based on a base case $1,738 per ounce gold price and an assumption that the gold would be recovered over the remaining 3-year mine-life. All material was assumed to be subject to a 3% NSR royalty and Nevada’s net proceeds tax.
Isabella Pearl LOM production showing waste and ore tonnes mined, ore grades, contained and recovered gold ounces, used in the economic analysis is summarized Table 19-1. Note that in 2023, ore from the stockpile supplements crusher feed. Gold recovered from 2023 through 2025 reflects gold ounces currently placed on the leach pad that will be recovered going forward.
Table 19-1 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Production Summary
Description | Units | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | TOTAL |
Total Material Tonnes Mined (t) | t | 3,950,000 | 438,241 | - | - | 4,388,241 |
Waste Tonnes Mined (t) | t | 3,260,759 | 218,727 | - | - | 3,479,487 |
Ore Tonnes Mined (t) | t | 689,241 | 219,514 | - | - | 908,754 |
High Grade Tonnes Mined | t | 546,390 | 211,701 | - | - | 758,091 |
Low Grade Tonnes Mined | t | 142,851 | 7,813 | - | - | 150,664 |
Ore Gold Grade Mined | g/t | 3.43 | 4.77 | - | - | 3.75 |
High Grade Mined | g/t | 4.21 | 4.92 | - | - | 4.41 |
Low Grade Mined | g/t | 0.46 | 0.50 | - | - | 0.47 |
Gold Ounces Mined | oz. | 76,030 | 33,636 | - | - | 109,666 |
High Grade Ounces Mined | oz. | 73,900 | 33,509 | - | - | 107,409 |
Low Grade Ounces Mined | oz. | 2,130 | 127 | - | - | 2,257 |
Ore Tonnes Crushed (t) | t | 660,000 | 596,889 | 100,860 | - | 1,357,749 |
High Grade Tonnes Crushed | t | 416,065 | 255,160 | 100,860 | - | 772,086 |
Low Grade Tonnes Crushed | t | 243,935 | 341,729 | - | - | 585,664 |
Ore Gold Grade Crushed (g/t) | g/t | 2.73 | 2.47 | 5.00 | - | 2.78 |
High Grade Crushed | g/t | 4.04 | 5.09 | 5.00 | - | 4.51 |
Low Grade Crushed | g/t | 0.51 | 0.51 | - | - | 0.51 |
Gold Ounces Crushed (oz.) | oz. | 58,032 | 47,319 | 16,198 | - | 121,549 |
High Grade Ounces Crushed | oz. | 53,997 | 41,754 | 16,198 | - | 111,950 |
Low Grade Ounces Crushed | oz. | 4,035 | 5,565 | - | - | 9,600 |
Gold Ounces Recovered (oz.) | oz. | 40,015 | 40,084 | 40,022 | 9,085 | 129,206 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 150 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
19.2 | Annual Production and Gross Sales Forecasts |
Isabella Pearl LOM gross sales used in the economic analysis is summarized Table 19-2.
Table 19-2 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Gross Sales
Description | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | TOTAL |
Gold Production (ozt) | 40,015 | 40,084 | 40,022 | 9,085 | 129,206 |
Gold Price ($/ozt) | $1,738 | $1,738 | $1,738 | $1,738 | $1,738 |
Revenue from Gold ($) | $69,545,625 | $69,666,082 | $69,558,913 | $15,789,845 | $224,560,464 |
Silver Production (ozt) | 32,012 | 32,067 | 32,018 | 7,268 | 103,365 |
Silver Price ($/ozt) | $23.22 | $23.22 | $23.22 | $23.22 | $23.22 |
Revenue from Silver ($) | $743,314 | $744,601 | $743,456 | $168,764 | $2,400,135 |
Gold Equivalent Ounces | 40,442 | 40,512 | 40,450 | 9,182 | 130,587 |
TOTAL SALES | $70,288,939 | $70,410,683 | $70,302,369 | $15,958,609 | $226,960,599 |
Isabella Pearl LOM profit (loss) statement is summarized Table 19-3.
Table 19-3 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Free Cash Flow Summary
19.3 | Life-of-Mine Cash Flow Forecast |
The economic results, at a discount rate of 5%, indicate a Net Present Value (NPV) of $100.6 million (after estimated taxes). The following provides the basis of the Isabella Pearl LOM plan and economics:
● | A mine life of 3 years, with continued gold production from the leach pad for a 4th year; |
● | An overall average gold recovery of 60% for ROM ore and 81% for crushed ore; |
● | An average operating cost of $483/ Au oz.-produced; |
● | Sustaining capital costs of $2.475 million and a mine closure cost estimate of $12 million; |
● | The analysis does not include any allowance for end of mine salvage value. |
The Isabella Pearl mine cash flow projection is presented in Table 19-4
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 151 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 19-4 : Isabella Pearl Life-of-Mine Cash Flow
Notes:
1. | Total ore processed includes material drawn from both high-grade and low-grade stockpiles plus the in situ mineral reserves. |
2. | Gold production and revenue reflect recoverable metal inventory already placed on the leach pads but not yet fully recovered. |
19.4 | Nevada State Taxes |
The Isabella Pearl mine is subject to the Nevada Net Proceeds of Minerals tax, Nevada property and sales taxes, and U.S. income taxes. The Net Proceeds of Minerals tax is an “ad valorem property tax assessed on minerals when they are sold or removed from Nevada. The tax is levied on 100% of the value of the net proceeds (gross proceeds minus allowable deductions for tax purposes).” Calculation of this tax is made at 2-5%, depending on the percentage ratio of net proceeds to gross yield. Federal income tax has been applied at 21%.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 152 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
19.5 | Sensitivity Analysis |
Table 19-5 and Figure 19-1 present a sensitivity analysis on the economics of the project. The gold price plays a major role in the performance of the NPV.
Table 19-5 Isabella Pearl Mine Sensitivity to Capex & Au Price
| Lower Case | Base Case | Upper Case |
| -10% | 0% | 10% |
Capex | $ 2,227,120 | $ 2,474,578 | $ 2,722,036 |
NPV (5%) | $ 100,793,011 | $ 100,554,172 | $ 100,315,333 |
| | | |
Au Price | $ 1,564 | $ 1,738 | $ 1,912 |
NPV (5%) | $ 85,069,712 | $ 100,554,172 | $ 115,038,631 |
Figure 19-1 Graph of Isabella Pearl Sensitivity to Capex and Gold Price
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 153 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
20 | Adjacent Properties |
20.1 | Registrant Properties |
WLMC, either directly or through GRCN, its parent and a related subsidiary of FGC, controls additional claims adjoining the Isabella Pearl mine and several properties within a 30 km (18 mi) radius. The additional properties include Mina Gold, East Camp Douglas, County Line, and the Golden Mile property acquired in 2020.
20.1.1 | Isabella Pearl Mineralized Trend |
WLMC controls 507 claims covering more than 20 km (12.4 mi.) along the Isabella Pearl mineralized trend to the northwest (Fig. 20.1). This is in addition to the 61 claims that cover the Isabella Pearl deposit and mine area. The claims include a combination of purchase acquisition and staking of new unpatented claims. These additional claims are summarized in Table 20-1.
Table 20-1 Unpatented Mining Claims held by WLMC Adjacent to Isabella Pearl
Description | Operator | No. of Claims |
Acquired | TXAU | 279 |
Acquired | NV Select Royalty | 153 |
Acquired | Gateway Gold | 3 |
Staked | WLMC 2020-2021 | 72 |
TOTAL | 507 |
Figure 20-1 shows the current land position and significant prospects along a nearly 30 km trend extending northwest of the Isabella Pearl mine. At least twenty-four gold prospect sites have been defined by previous operators (TXAU, CMRC, Homestake and others) along the northwest trend. At least twelve are considered high priority prospective target areas under current examination by WLMC within the entire Isabella Pearl claim area.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 154 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Figure 20-1 : WLMC’s regional land status highlighting Isabella Pearl, and other important mines and prospects. Outline shows FGC land position and red dots represent significant prospects or mines; blue stars indicate historic mines.
20.1.2 | Other Registrant Properties |
GRCN has purchased four other properties near, but not adjacent with the Isabella Pearl mine. These include the County Line, Mina, Golden Mile and East Camp Douglas projects within the Walker Lane Mineral Belt.
20.2 | Other Properties |
Isabella Pearl mine is situated along strong structural controls and alignments within the Walker Lane mineral belt which hosts numerous significant epithermal gold and silver deposits. Significant mines and mining districts located along the Walker Lane mineralized trend include Aurora, Bodie, Bullfrog, Comstock, Goldfield, Silver Peak (Mineral Ridge) and Tonopah.
Only one company holds claims adjacent to Isabella Pearl. Lahontan Gold Corp. controls the Santa Fe project on the Isabella Pearl mineralized trend. This project is located just southeast and across the highway from the Isabella Pearl mine and was mined in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. The Santa Fe mine reportedly produced 345,499 ounces of gold and 710,629 ounces of silver from four deposits
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 155 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
averaging about 1.16 g/t (0.034 opst) gold and 8.6 g/t (0.25 opst) silver. Gustavson has not been able to independently verify this information, and this information is independent of the mineralization at Isabella Pearl.
Currently the Santa Fe project contains four previously mined pits, the Santa Fe, Slab, Calvada, and York pits, as well as two additional prospective zones, the BH Zone and the Pinnacles zone. There are no current mineral resources or reserves reported for the Santa Fe project.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 156 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
21 | Other Relevant Data and Information |
There is no other additional information or explanation necessary to provide a complete and balanced presentation of the value of the property to the registrant. This technical report was prepared to be as understandable as possible and to not be misleading.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 157 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
22 | Interpretation and Conclusions |
Isabella Pearl is a producing gold mine with a favorable economic projection based on actual operating costs and a detailed mining and processing plan.
22.1 | Interpretation |
Precious-metal mineralization in the Isabella Pearl mine area occurs in a thick sequence of Oligocene ash flow tuffs that overlies Triassic sedimentary rocks intruded by Jurassic or Cretaceous stocks and dikes. Welded and unwelded portions of the Guild Mine Member of the Mickey Pass Tuff host several gold-silver deposits that are the focus of this report. The Isabella Pearl deposit geology is generally understood, and structural geology and alteration are the primary controls on mineralization.
Gustavson has audited the verification of the Isabella Pearl drill hole database and considers the assay data to be adequate for the estimation of the mineral resources. The extracted drill hole database contains 572 unique collar records and 29,523 assay records, broken down by drilling type as:
● | AT: 6 drill holes for 82.0 m (269 ft) |
● | RC: 513 drill holes for 46,229 m (151,670 ft) |
● | DDH: 36 drill holes for 3,564.5 m (11,695 ft) |
Mineral resources at Isabella Pearl are further defined within a constraining pit shell and above a defined cut-off value. Mineral resources reported herein has been constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman optimized pit shell and are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au (0.01 opst).
Measured and Indicated mineral resources reported herein for Isabella Pearl contain 598 thousand tonnes (659 thousand short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 2.12 g/t Au (0.062 opst) and 26 g/t Ag (0.8 opst) (Table 11.8). Inferred mineral resources reported for Isabella Pearl contain 288.2 thousand tonnes (317.7 thousand short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.55 g/t Au (0.045 opst) and 17 g/t Ag (0.5 opst). The modeling and estimation of mineral resources presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of December 31, 2021.
The physical locations of mineral resources have been confirmed at the mining scale using blast-hole drilling results and grade control modeling.
The conversion of mineral resources to mineral reserves required accumulative knowledge achieved through LG pit optimization, detailed pit design, scheduling and associated modifying parameters. Detailed access, haulage, and operational cost criteria were applied in this process for Isabella Pearl deposit.
The quantities of material within the designed pits were calculated using a cut-off grade of 0.61 g/t Au for crushed ore and material grading between 0.33 and 0.61 g/t Au being sent to a low-grade stockpile for
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 158 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
either future crushing or direct placement on the heap as ROM ore. The consensus 2022-2024 average price of $1,738/oz for gold (CIBC, 2021) was observed at the time of this mineral reserve estimate.
The proven and probable mineral reserves reported for the Isabella Pearl mine, using diluted grades, is 1.36 million tonnes (1.50 million short tons) at an average gold grade of 2.78 g/t Au (0.081 opst) and 24 g/t Ag (0.7 opst) containing 121,500 ounces of gold and 1,057,600 ounces of silver.
WLMC also controls over 500 mining claims along the Walker Lane trend to the northwest of the deposit. Multiple exploration targets have been identified that are not included in the property that is the subject of this report.
22.2 | Conclusion |
Based upon the above interpretations Gustavson has drawn the following conclusions.
The orientation, proximity to the topographic surface, and geological controls of the Isabella Pearl mineralization support continued mining of the mineral reserves with open pit mining techniques. To calculate the mineable reserve, pits were designed following an optimized LG pit based on a $1,738/oz Au sales price. This price was chosen to create the primary guide surface based on a price sensitivity and subsequent profitability study that showed that the $1,738 pit maximized profitability while reducing capital requirements.
The mineral resources are constrained within an economic pit shell based on near market price and operating parameters, including metal recoveries with the current heap leach processing. The resources are thus limited by current processing and economics and there is additional sulfide material defined outside of the shell. This material is not constrained by drilling, and it has a potential to be converted to a mineral resource with additional metallurgical study and future drilling.
The Isabella Pearl mine’s economic viability is exposed to risk from changes in external factors which would lead to increases in input costs (e.g., operating costs), or a fall in the price of gold which would reduce revenue. A decrease in gold price would not only reduce revenue but could also reduce the amount of economically mineable ore as a decrease in metal prices would result in a higher cut-off grade. Under the current gold price environment, the mineral reserves are considered robust.
Typical environmental risks include items being discovered on the mine site such as sensitive or endangered botany, or cultural artifacts, which could affect potential expansion and make additional permitting difficult at the Isabella Pearl mine. No environmental and permitting risks were identified and the BLM has issued all regulatory permits to operate the mine. Internal risks, specific to the mine include:
● | Current drill spacing is considered adequate but there is a low risk of a decrease in mineral resources due to additional drilling and subsequent re-modeling and re-estimations. |
● | Predicted gold recovery from the Isabella Pearl ore is based on the results of column-leach tests and expected results could be lower than expected. This risk is deemed to be low, given the numerous metallurgical tests that have been conducted on the Isabella Pearl mineral resources during the past 30 years. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 159 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
● | Should the metallurgical efficiencies and reagent consumption rates assumed in previous studies not be generally achieved, the mine may not achieve the predicted economic performance. |
● | Finding and keeping the skilled employees required to operate the Isabella Pearl mine has proven to be challenging, given its rural location. Inadequate staffing could potentially increase operating costs by reducing operating efficiencies and increasing repair and maintenance costs. Recruiting costs might be higher than predicted. |
22.3 | Significant Opportunities |
The 2021 Scarlet drill program has confirmed gold mineralization associated with the northwestern structural extensions of the Isabella Pearl mine. This high-grade mineralization remains open to the northwest along the Isabella Pearl trend. WLMC has applied for a permit to expand the Isabella Pearl mine plan boundary to the northwest, which opens up additional areas associated with the Scarlet target for exploration within the permitted mine plan. Scarlet is just one of multiple gold targets associated within WLMC’s Isabella Pearl property covering over 10 km (6 mi) of an important mineralized fault corridor in the Walker Lane Mineral Belt. The numerous exploration targets are expected to host additional open pit deposits for continued mining operations.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 160 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
23 | Recommendations |
The QP’s preparing this report for WLMC recommend that the Isabella Pearl mine continue with open pit mining and processing the ore by screening, stacking, heap leaching, ADR and doré production. Additional RC drilling to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves is recommended.
The QP’s also recommend that WLMC investigate the possibility of producing sulfide concentrates from the deeper sulfide material for potential sale to mill operators. Should any of this material be developed as mineral resources and mineral reserves, there is an opportunity to extend the life of the operation, and with a potentially larger pit, to extract more oxide material for possible future heap leaching. An initial work programs would be accomplished with consulting services using currently available samples, or samples generated in new drilling.
23.1 | RC Drilling for Mineral Reserves |
The Isabella Pearl mine will benefit from additional drilling to the northwest of the Isabella Pearl deposit, mainly on the Crimson, Scarlet South and Silica Knob structures, and further along strike to the northwest. There is already potential identified for mineral reserve expansion in this area. Once exploration drilling is completed, mineral reserve estimates will be updated, and the mine plan modified to incorporate any new mineral reserves. The proposed budget for 6,096 m (20,000 ft) of exploration RC drilling is shown in Table 23-1. The estimated cost of the recommended exploration drilling program is $1,360,000. The cost of this recommended work has not been included in the Isabella Pearl cash-flow model.
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 161 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Table 23-1 Detailed Budget for Proposed Exploration Drilling at Isabella Pearl Mine
Description | Total Cost (USD) |
Salaries and Wages | 120,000 |
Vacation Days | 1,500 |
Health Insurance | 3,000 |
401K Expense | 1,800 |
Payroll Taxes Employer | 6,000 |
Workers Compensation Insurance | 3,000 |
Contractors Drilling (RC) - 6,096 m | 440,000 |
Contractors Maintenance | 30,000 |
Contractors Services | 120,000 |
Material Used by Contractors | 120,000 |
Topographical Studies | 12,000 |
Environmental Studies | 12,000 |
Laboratory Assays | 205,000 |
Maintenance Vehicles | 1,200 |
Transportation Other Freight | 1,200 |
Software & Licenses (non-cap) | 3,000 |
Consulting Services | 200,000 |
Lodging | 12,000 |
Meals | 6,000 |
Other Travel Expenses | 6,000 |
Gasoline | 6,300 |
Drilling Steels | 24,000 |
Field Supplies and Materials | 6,000 |
Allocation of Labor Costs | 120,000 |
Total | 1,460,000 |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 162 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
24 | References |
Aqua Hydrogeologic Consulting, 2012, Isabella Pearl Mine Monitoring Well Drilling Report.
Aqua Hydrogeologic Consulting, 2016, Isabella Pearl Production Well Drilling, Construction and Pumping Test Report.
Back, G. N., 2009, Isabella-Pearl Project Biological Baseline Survey prepared by Great Basin Ecology, Inc.
Brown, F.H., Garcia, J.R., Devlin, B.D., and Lester, J.L., 2018, Report on the Estimate of Reserves and the Feasibility Study for the Isabella Pearl Project, Mineral County, Nevada for Walker Lane Minerals Corp., 270p.
Brown, F. H., Garcia, J. R., Devlin, B. D., and Lester, J. L., 2021, Report on the estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves for the Isabella Pearl Mine, Mineral County, Nevada for Walker Lane Minerals Corp.; Fortitude Gold Corporation Company report, p. 190.
Carr, J., 2007, Preliminary Review of Selected Unpatented Mining Claims, Sections 26, 26, 34 and 35, T9N, R34E and Section 3, T8N, R34E, Mineral County, Nevada, 25p. plus attachments.
CIBC, 2021, Global Mining Group, Analyst Consensus Commodity Price Forecasts, November 30, 2021.
Diner, Y. A., 1983, The HY precious metals lode prospect, Mineral County, Nevada: Master’s thesis submitted to the Department of Applied Science, Stanford University, California, 11 plates, p. 218.
Ekrin, E. B. and Byers, F.M. Jr., 1985, Geologic Map of the Gabbs Mountain, Mount Ferguson, Luning, and Sunrise Flat Quadrangles.
Erwin, T. P., 2016, Mineral Status Report Mina Project Mineral County Nevada: Confidential Legal Advice provide to Gold Resource Corporation, 34p.
Great Basin Ecology, Inc., 2017, Isabella Pearl Project Biological Survey
Golden, J., 2000, Walker Lane Property, Level I Feasibility Report for the Isabella Mine: report prepared for Combined Metals Reduction Company by Sierra Mining & Engineering, LLC, 40p. and appendices.
Golder Associates Inc., 2020, “Site Visit and Geotechnical Review of Open Pit Mine Slopes Isabella Pearl Mine, Mineral County, Nevada”
Hamm, J.C., 1999, Geology, exploration potential and recommended exploration drilling program respecting the Walker Lane Property of Combined Metals Reduction Company, Tesoro Gold Company (internal company report), p. 127.
Hamm, J. C., 2010, Technical Report on the Walker Lane Property: report prepared for Tesoro Gold Company, 103p.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 163 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Hedenquist, J., 2017a, Exploration for Lithocap-Hosted Epithermal Deposits: private presentation to Gold Resource Corp., Nevada: August 2017
Hedenquist, J., 2017b, Observations after brief visit to Isabella Pearl property, Nevada: private report for Walker Lane Minerals Corp., 4p
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2017, Isabella Pearl Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work July 2017, 178p.
Miskelly, N., 2003, Progress on International Standards for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Reserves by Norman Miskelly, Chairman, Combined Reserves International Reporting Standards Committee (CRIRSCO) dated September 20, 2003; 22 pgs.
Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation, 2021, www.nvdetr.org
Nevada State Demographer, 2020, www.nvdemography.org
Prenn, N. B., and Gustin, M. M., 2008, Resource Report and Scoping Study, Isabella-Pearl Deposits, Gabbs Valley Project, Mineral County, Nevada: report prepared for TXAU Investments, Inc. by Mine Development Associates, 78p.
Prenn, N. B., and Gustin, M. M., 2011 & 2013, Pre-Feasibility Study and Updated Resource Report, Isabella-Pearl Deposits, Mineral County, Nevada: unpublished report prepared for Isabella Pearl LLC (“TXAU”), Inc. by Mine Development Associates, 127p.
SEC, 1992, Industry Guide 7: Description of property by issuers engaged or to be engaged in significant mining operations. Release No. FR-39, July 30, 1992, effective August 13, 1992, 57 Federal Register 36442.
SEC, 2018a, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 17 CFR Parts 229, 230, 239, and 249, RIN 3235-AL81, Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants, Final Rule; 453 pgs.
SEC, 2018b, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Adopts Rules to Modernize Property Disclosures Required for Mining Registrants, Press Release (Release Nos. 33-10570; 34-84509; File No. S7-10-16) Dated October 31, 2018; 3 pgs.
Telesto Nevada Inc., 2008, Geotechnical Investigation Report, Isabela-Pearl Joint Venture Mineral County, Nevada
Tierra Group International, Ltd., 2021, Isabella Pearl Mine – Pit Expansion Slope Stability Assessment
US Census Bureau, 2021, www.census.gov
Welsh Hagen Associates, 2018, Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan Isabella Pearl Project Luning, NV prepared for Walker Lane Minerals Corp., 81p.
Winmill, P. J., 2008, Title opinion on certain unpatented mining claims Mineral County, Nevada: private report prepared for HB Engineering Group for the benefit of TXAU Investments, 21p.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 164 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
WLMC, 2021, Isabella Pearl Project, Closure Cost Estimate,
WLMC July2021_SRCE_Version_1_4_1_017b_(rev2).pdf, 29p.
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 165 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
25 | Reliance on Information Provided by Registrant |
Preparation of this technical report has relied on information provided by the registrant for the following:
● | Mineral Claim Information |
● | Environmental and Operational Permit Information |
● | Technical studies provided by third party consultants (geotechnical and hydro-geological) |
● | Historical Cost and Production Information. |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 166 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY
A.1Definition of Terms
The following terms used in this report shall have the following meanings:
Doré: | Unrefined gold and silver bars usually containing more than 90% precious metal. |
| |
Epithermal: | Used to describe gold deposits found on or just below the surface close to vents or volcanoes, formed at low temperature and pressure. |
| |
Gram: | A metric unit of weight and mass, equal to 1/1000th of a kilogram. One gram equals .035 ounces. One ounce equals 31.103 grams. |
| |
Gold Institute Production Cost Standard: | To improve the reporting practices within the gold mining industry, the gold industry in 1996 adopted The Gold Institute Production Cost Standard, a uniform format for reporting production costs on a per-ounce basis. The purpose of the Standard is to provide analysts and other market observers with a means to make more-reliable financial comparisons of companies and their operations. |
| |
Hectare: | Another metric unit of measurement, for surface area. One hectare equals 1/200th of a square kilometer, 10,000 square meters, or 2.47 acres. A hectare is approximately the size of a soccer field. |
| |
Kilometer: | Another metric unit of measurement, for distance. The prefix “kilo” means 1000, so one kilometer equals 1,000 meters, one kilometer equals 3,280.84 feet, which equals 1,093.6 yards, which equals 0.6214 miles. |
Net Smelter Return Royalty: | A share of the net revenue generated from the sale of metal produced by the mine. Usage-based payments made by one party (the “licensee”) to another (the “licensor”) for the right to ongoing use of an asset, sometimes called an intellectual property. Typically agreed upon as a percentage of gross or net revenues derived from the use of an asset or a fixed price per unit sold. |
Ore or Ore Deposit: | Rocks that contain economic amounts of minerals in them and that are expected to be profitably mined. |
| |
Silicified: | Is combined or impregnated with silicon or silica. |
| |
Tonne: | A metric ton. One tonne equals 1000 kg. It is approximately equal to 2,204.62 pounds. |
| |
VulcanTM: | Maptek-Vulcan 3D geology and mining modeling software program |
| |
Conversion Table | |
| |
Metric System | Imperial System |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 167 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
1 meter (m) | 3.2808 feet (ft) |
1 kilometer (km) | 0.6214 mile (mi) |
1 square kilometer (km2) | 0.3861 square mile (mi2) |
1 square kilometer (km2) | 100 hectares (has) |
1 hectare (ha) | 2.471 acres (ac) |
1 gram (g) | 0.0322 troy ounce (oz) |
1 kilogram (kg) | 2.2046 pounds (lb) |
1 tonne (t) | 1.1023 short tons (T) |
1 gram/tonne (g/t) | 0.0292 ounce/ton (oz/t) |
Unless stated otherwise, all measurements reported here are metric and currencies are expressed in constant U.S. dollars.
A.2Abbreviations
Other common abbreviations encountered in the text of this report are listed below:
˚C | degree Centigrade |
AA | atomic absorption |
AAL | American Assay Laboratories, Inc. |
AAS | Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy |
Ag | silver |
ALS | ALS USA Inc. |
Au | gold |
AuEq | Precious Metal Gold Equivalent (unless otherwise noted) |
BAPC | Bureau of Air Pollution Control |
BCY | bank cubic yard |
BLM | Bureau of Land Management |
BMMR | Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation |
BWM | Bureau of Waste Management |
BWPC | Bureau of Water Pollution Control |
Cfm | cubic feet per minute |
CIM | Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum |
CIP | Carbon-in-Pulp |
cm | centimeter |
CMRC | Combined Metals Reduction Company |
Combined Metals | Combined Metals Reduction Company |
core | diamond core-drilling method |
Cu | copper |
Dawson | Dawson Metallurgical Laboratories, Inc. |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 168 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
DCNR | Department of Conservation and Natural Resources |
DDH | Diamond Drill (Core)Hole |
dmt | dry metric tonne |
EA | Environmental Assessment |
EPA | Environmental Protection Agency |
FA-AA | fire assay with an atomic absorption finish |
ft or (‘) | feet = 0.3048 metre |
g/t or gpt | gram/tonne |
g | gram(s) = 0.001 kg |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
gpm | gallons per minute |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
GRC | Gold Resource Corporation |
FGC | Fortitude Gold Corporation |
ha | hectare(s) |
Hazen | Hazen Research Inc. |
HB Engineering | HB Engineering Group |
Homestake | Homestake Mining Company |
hp | horsepower |
in or (“) | inch, 2.54 cm = 25.4 mm |
IRR | Internal Rate-of-Return |
Kay Drilling | Leroy Kay Drilling Co. |
K-Ar | Potassium-Argon (referring to age date technique) |
KCA | Kappes, Cassiday & Associates |
kg | kilogram, or kg/t (kilogram per tonne) |
km | kilometer |
Kva | Kilovolt-amps |
Kw | Kilowatt |
lb | pound |
l | liter |
LOM | Life-of-Mine |
m | meter |
Ma | million years age |
masl | meters above sea level |
McClelland | McClelland Laboratories Inc. |
MDA | Mine Development Associates |
mean | arithmetic average of group of samples |
μm | microns |
mi | mile |
mm | millimeter |
MSHA | Mine Safety and Health Administration |
Mw | Megawatt |
NDEP | Nevada Division of Environmental Protection |
NDOW | Nevada Department of Wildlife |
NDWR | Nevada Division of Water Resources |
NEPA | National Environmental Policy Act |
NI 43-101 | Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 |
NOI | Notice-of-Intent |
NPV | Net Present Value |
NSR | Net Smelter Return |
Opst | Ounces per short ton |
Fortitude Gold Corporation | 169 |
Isabella Pearl Mine | Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary |
Ounce | Troy ounce, or 31.1035 g |
oz | ounce (Troy Oz) |
P80 3/4” | 80% passing a ¾” screen |
P100 3/8” | 100% passing a 3/8” screen |
Pb | lead |
POO | Plan of Operations |
ppb | parts per billion |
ppm | parts per million = g/t |
psi | pounds per square inch |
RC | reverse-circulation drilling method |
Repadre | Repadre International Corporation |
ROD | Record of Decision |
ROM | Run-of-Mine |
RQD | Rock Quality Designation |
QA/QC | Quality Assurance/Quality Control |
QP | Qualified Person |
SEC | Securities Exchange Commission |
Sierra Mining | Sierra Mining & Engineering, LLC |
SRCE | Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator |
SRM | Standard Reference Material |
t, tonne | metric tonne = 1.1023 short tons |
TXAU | TXAU Investments, Inc./TXAU Development Ltd./Isabella Pearl LLC |
T, Ton | Imperial or short ton |
Tpd, or tpd | tonnes per day |
WLMC | Walker Lane Minerals Corporation |
WPCP | Water Pollution Control Permit |
wt | weight |
Zn | zinc |
Gustavson Associates, LLC | 25 February 2022 |
Christopher Emanuel, SME-RM
Gustavson Associates LLC, a Member of WSP
200 Union Blvd, Suite 440; Lakewood CO
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Christopher Emanuel, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of part of the technical report summary titled Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary Isabella Pearl Mine Mineral County, NV with an effective date of 31 December 2021 as signed and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).
Furthermore, I state that:
(a)I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Fortitude Gold Corp.;
(b) | the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is 10-K/A Annual Report (the “Document”); |
(c) | I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and |
(d) | I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible. |
Dated at Lakewood, Colorado, USA this 14 of December 2022.
/s/ Christopher Emanuel
Signature of Qualified Person
Christopher Emanuel SME-RM 4151007-RM
Ian Crundwell, P.Geo
WSP Canada Inc.
2300 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M4P 1E4, Canada
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Ian Hugh Crundwell, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of part of the technical report summary titled Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary Isabella Pearl Mine Mineral County, NV with an effective date of 31 December 2021 as signed and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).
Furthermore, I state that:
(a)I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Fortitude Gold Corp.;
(b) | the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is 10-K/A Annual Report (the “Document”); |
(c) | I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and |
(d) | I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible. |
Dated at Burlington, Ontario this 7 of December 2022.
/s/ Ian Crundwell
Signature of Qualified Person
Ian Crundwell, P.Geo
Donald E. Hulse, SME-RM
Gustavson Associates LLC, a Member of WSP
200 Union Blvd, Suite 440; Lakewood CO
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Donald E. Hulse, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of part of the technical report summary titled Amended S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary Isabella Pearl Mine Mineral County, NV with an effective date of 31 December 2021 as signed and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).
Furthermore, I state that:
(a)I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Fortitude Gold Corp.;
(b) | the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is 10-K/A Annual Report (the “Document”); |
(c) | I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and |
(d) | I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible. |
Dated at Lakewood, Colorado, USA this 14 of December 2022.
/s/ Donald E. Hulse
Signature of Qualified Person
SME-RM 1533190-RM
Colorado P.E. 35269
Exhibit 96.6
AMENDED INITIAL ASSESSMENT
TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY
for the
GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY
MINERAL COUNTY, NEVADA
for
GRC NEVADA INC.
(a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortitude Gold Corp.)
Signed by:
FRED H. BROWN, PGeo
Consulting Geologist, Independent
BARRY D. DEVLIN, PGeo
Vice President, Exploration, Fortitude Gold Corp.
JOY L. LESTER, SME-RM
Chief Geologist, Fortitude Gold Corp.
Effective Date:September 30, 2021
Report Date:November 9, 2021
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
5 | HISTORY | 38 | ||||
| 5.1 | Prior Ownership and Ownership Changes | 38 | |||
| 5.2 | Historical Exploration and Development | 39 | |||
| | 5.2.1 | Early Exploration Work | 41 | ||
| | 5.2.2 | Teck | 43 | ||
| | 5.2.3 | Cordex | 44 | ||
| | 5.2.4 | Portage | 47 | ||
| | 5.2.5 | Roscan | 47 | ||
| | 5.2.6 | NMPII | 48 | ||
| | 5.2.7 | Kinross | 48 | ||
| 5.3 | Geophysics | 51 | |||
| 5.4 | Historical Production | 53 | |||
6 | GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT | 54 | ||||
| 6.1 | Regional Geology | 54 | |||
| 6.2 | Local and Property Geology | 57 | |||
| | 6.2.1 | Lithology | 60 | ||
| | | 6.2.1.1 | Sedimentary Rocks | 60 | |
| | | 6.2.1.2 | Volcanic Rocks | 61 | |
| | | 6.2.1.3 | Intrusive Rocks | 62 | |
| | 6.2.2 | Structural Geology | 63 | ||
| | 6.2.3 | Alteration and Mineralization | 68 | ||
| | | 6.2.3.1 | Main Zone | 68 | |
| | | 6.2.3.2 | Stockwork Zones | 69 | |
| | | 6.2.3.3 | Detailed Description of Skarn Alteration | 69 | |
| | | | 6.2.3.3.1 | Exoskarn | 70 |
| | | | 6.2.3.3.2 | Endoskarn | 71 |
| | 6.2.4 | Petrography | 74 | ||
| 6.3 | Deposit | 79 | |||
| | 6.3.1 | Extents and Continuity | 79 | ||
7 | EXPLORATION | 81 | ||||
| 7.1 | Exploration Work by GRCN | 81 | |||
| | 7.1.1 | Remote Sensing | 82 | ||
| 7.2 | Drilling | 83 | |||
| | 7.2.1 | Core Drilling | 83 |
2
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| | 7.2.2 | RC Drilling | 84 | |
| 7.3 | Downhole Surveying | 84 | ||
| 7.4 | GRCN Drilling Results | 84 | ||
| | 7.4.1 | Core Drilling Results | 85 | |
| | 7.4.2 | RC Drilling Results | 87 | |
| 7.5 | Interpretation | 89 | ||
8 | SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS AND SECURITY | 91 | |||
| 8.1 | Historic Procedures | 91 | ||
| | 8.1.1 | Cordex 2006 | 91 | |
| | 8.1.2 | Roscan 2011 | 92 | |
| 8.2 | GRCN Procedures | 92 | ||
| | 8.2.1 | Security Measures | 92 | |
| | 8.2.2 | Sample Preparation and Analysis | 93 | |
| | 8.2.3 | Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures | 93 | |
| | 8.2.4 | Check Assays | 99 | |
| 8.3 | Opinion on Adequacy | 100 | ||
9 | DATA VERIFICATION | 101 | |||
| 9.1 | Historic Property Evaluation and Data Verification | 101 | ||
| | 9.1.1 | Teck | 101 | |
| | 9.1.2 | Cordex | 101 | |
| | 9.1.3 | Portage | 102 | |
| 9.2 | GRCN Data Verification | 103 | ||
| | 9.2.1 | GRCN Check Samples | 103 | |
| | 9.2.2 | Drilling Database | 105 | |
| 9.3 | Opinion on Data Adequacy | 105 | ||
10 | MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING | 106 | |||
| 10.1 | Historic Metallurgical Testing | 106 | ||
| 10.2 | GRCN Metallurgical Testing | 108 | ||
| | 10.2.1 | GRCN Initial Cyanide Bottle Roll Leach Testing | 108 | |
| | 10.2.2 | Metallic Screen Assays | 109 | |
| | 10.2.3 | 2021 Metallurgical Testing (KCA) | 111 | |
| | | 10.2.3.1 | Head Analyses | 111 |
| | | 10.2.3.2 | Head Screen Analysis with Assays by Size Fraction | 116 |
| | | 10.2.3.3 | Comminution Test Work | 118 |
3
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| | | 10.2.3.4 | Characterization Test Work | 118 | ||
| | | 10.2.3.5 | Agglomeration Test Work | 119 | ||
| | | 10.2.3.6 | Percent Slump and Final Apparent Bulk Density | 120 | ||
| | | 10.2.3.7 | Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests | 121 | ||
| | | 10.2.3.8 | Column Leach Test Work | 125 | ||
| 10.3 | Opinion on Adequacy | 127 | ||||
11 | MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES | 128 | |||||
| 11.1 | Introduction | 128 | ||||
| 11.2 | Mineral Resource Definitions | 128 | ||||
| | 11.2.1 | Inferred Mineral Resource | 129 | |||
| | 11.2.2 | Indicated Mineral Resource | 129 | |||
| | 11.2.3 | Measured Mineral Resource | 129 | |||
| 11.3 | Database | 129 | ||||
| | 11.3.1 | Drill Data | 131 | |||
| 11.4 | Bulk Density | 132 | ||||
| 11.5 | Wireframe Modeling | 133 | ||||
| | 11.5.1 | Topography | 133 | |||
| | 11.5.2 | Mineralization Envelopes | 135 | |||
| 11.6 | Compositing | 135 | ||||
| 11.7 | Exploratory Data Analysis | 136 | ||||
| 11.8 | Treatment of Extreme Values | 137 | ||||
| 11.9 | Continuity Analysis | 139 | ||||
| 11.10 | Block Model | 140 | ||||
| 11.11 | Estimation and Classification | 140 | ||||
| 11.12 | Mineral Resource Estimate | 142 | ||||
| 11.13 | Mineral Resource Estimate Sensitivity | 143 | ||||
| 11.14 | Risk Factors | 144 | ||||
| 11.15 | Opinion on Adequacy | 144 | ||||
12 | MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES | 145 | |||||
13 | MINING METHODS | 146 | |||||
14 | PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS | 147 | |||||
15 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 148 | |||||
16 | MARKET STUDIES | 149 |
4
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
17 | ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS, OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS | 150 | ||
18 | CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS | 151 | ||
19 | ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | 152 | ||
20 | ADJACENT PROPERTIES | 153 | ||
| 20.1 | Registrant Properties | 153 | |
| | 20.1.1 | Mina Gold | 154 |
| 20.2 | Adjacent Properties | 154 | |
21 | OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION | 155 | ||
22 | INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS | 156 | ||
| 22.1 | Interpretation | 156 | |
| 22.2 | Conclusions | 157 | |
23 | RECOMMENDATIONS | 159 | ||
| 23.1 | Proposed Exploration Program | 159 | |
| 23.2 | Proposed Technical Studies | 161 | |
24 | REFERENCES | 162 | ||
25 | RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT | 165 | ||
APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY | 166 | |||
| A.1 | Definition of Terms | 166 | |
| A.2 | Abbreviations | 168 | |
APPENDIX B: CERTIFICATES OF QUALIFIED PERSONS | 170 |
5
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Mineral Resource Inventory at Golden Mile, Mineral County, NV, USA | 14 |
Table 1.2 Budget for Proposed Exploration Work at the Golden Mile Property | 16 |
Table 1.3 Budget for Proposed Technical Studies at the Golden Mile Property | 16 |
Table 3.1 List of Unpatented Lode Mineral Claims for the Golden Mile Property | 22 |
Table 3.2 List of Patented Mineral Claims for the Golden Mile Property | 31 |
Table 5.1 Summary of Historic Drilling Completed at the Golden Mile Property | 40 |
Table 5.2 Summary of Significant Historic Drilling Intercepts* | 41 |
Table 5.3 Teck Significant Surface Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au) | 44 |
Table 5.4 Cordex Significant Surface Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au) | 45 |
Table 5.5 Significant Results from Cordex Drilling | 46 |
Table 5.6 Significant Results from Roscan Drilling | 48 |
Table 5.7 Significant Results from Kinross Drilling 2017-2019 | 49 |
Table 5.8 Comparing average assay values for various parts of the Golden Mile Stock | 51 |
Table 5.9 1936 Production Assays | 53 |
Table 6.1 Summary Table of Petrography on Samples from Golden Mile | 76 |
Table 7.1 Summary of GRCN Drilling Completed at the Golden Mile Property | 85 |
Table 7.2 Significant Results for GRCN 2020-2021 Core Drilling at Golden Mile | 86 |
Table 7.3 Significant Results for GRCN 2021 RC Drilling at Golden Mile | 88 |
Table 8.1 GRCN 2020-2021 Standard Reference Material (SRM) | 93 |
Table 8.2 GRCN 2020-2021 QA/QC SRM Results for DDH Drill Holes | 94 |
Table 8.3 GRCN 2020-2021 QA/QC Blanks Results for DDH Drill Holes | 95 |
Table 8.4 2020-2021 SRM Failures | 97 |
Table 8.5 2020-2021 Blank Material Failures | 98 |
Table 9.1 Cordex Significant Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au) | 102 |
Table 9.2 Portage Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au) | 103 |
Table 9.3 GRCN Rock Chip Check Samples | 104 |
Table 10.1 Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests on Pulverized Material | 107 |
Table 10.2 GRCN Initial Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests on Pulverized Material | 107 |
Table 10.3 Metallic Screen Assays on Pulverized Material | 110 |
Table 10.4 Golden Mile Composite Core Samples Selected for Metallurgical Testing | 111 |
Table 10.5 Gold Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites | 112 |
Table 10.6 Silver Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites | 112 |
Table 10.7 Mercury and Copper Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites | 112 |
Table 10.8 Carbon and Sulfur Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites | 113 |
Table 10.9 Head Analyses – Multi-Element | 114 |
Table 10.10 Head Analyses - Whole Rock | 115 |
Table 10.11 Head Analyses – Cyanide Shake Tests | 116 |
Table 10.12 Summary of Head Screen Analyses | 117 |
Table 10.13 Summary of Comminution Test Work | 118 |
Table 10.14 Summary of QXRD Analyses | 118 |
Table 10.15 Summary of Agglomeration Test Work | 120 |
Table 10.16 Percent Slump and Final Apparent Bulk Density | 120 |
Table 10.17 Summary Direct Agitated Cyanidation (Bottle Roll) Gold-and Silver Test Results | 122 |
6
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.18 Summary of Metal Extractions and Chemical Consumptions – Gold | 126 |
Table 10.19 Summary of Metal Extractions and Chemical Consumptions – Silver | 126 |
Table 11.1 Golden Mile Drill Hole Database Summary | 130 |
Table 11.2 Golden Mile Assay Database Summary | 130 |
Table 11.3 Summary Assay Statistics | 132 |
Table 11.4 GCP Geolocation Errors | 134 |
Table 11.5 Constrained Composite Statistics for Gold Values | 136 |
Table 11.6 Capping Thresholds | 139 |
Table 11.7 Block Model Setup | 140 |
Table 11.8 Parameters Used for Mineral Resources Cutoff Calculation | 142 |
Table 11.9 Mineral Resource Inventory at Golden Mile, Mineral County, Nevada, USA | 143 |
Table 11.10 Cutoff Grade Sensitivity for the Golden Mile Deposit | 143 |
Table 11.11 Mineral Resource Estimation Risk Factors | 144 |
Table 23.1 Budget for Proposed Exploration at Golden Mile Property | 160 |
Table 23.2 Budget for Proposed Technical Studies at Golden Mile Property | 161 |
7
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1 General Location Map of the Golden Mile Property | 21 |
Figure 3.2 Golden Mile Property Mineral Claims Map | 22 |
Figure 3.3 Hydrographic Basins in the Golden Mile Property area | 34 |
Figure 4.1 Golden Mile Property Access | 36 |
Figure 5.1 Location Map of Historic Drill Holes Completed on the Golden Mile Property | 40 |
Figure 5.2 Photos looking North at Main Zone of Golden Mile Property | 42 |
Figure 5.3 Location Map of Geophysical Surveys Completed on the Golden Mile Property | 52 |
Figure 6.1 Generalized Geologic Map of Nevada showing location of Golden Mile Property | 55 |
Figure 6.2 Shaded relief map of western North America with state boundaries in white | 56 |
Figure 6.3 Geologic Map of the Golden Mile Property Area | 58 |
Figure 6.4 Schematic cross-section looking northeast at Golden Mile | 59 |
Figure 6.5 Geologic Map of the Main Zone Deposit Area of the Golden Mile Property | 59 |
Figure 6.6 Stratigraphic Column showing Geology and Alteration at the Golden Mile Property | 60 |
Figure 6.7 Magnetite-Copper Skarn of the Main Zone at Golden Mile | 61 |
Figure 6.8 Road Fault mylonite breccia (Hole GMDD-13 @ 315 ft) | 64 |
Figure 6.9 3D Structural Interpretation of the Southwest, Central and Northeast Structural Grade Zones of the Main Zone at Golden Mile | 65 |
Fig. 6.10 Examples of high-grade gold intercepts from the Center Grade Zone | 66 |
Figure 6.11 Conceptual Structural Model showing the structural fabrics of faults and veins related to splays the dextral-slip Road Fault model | 67 |
Figure 6.12 Alteration and Mineralization Types Observed at Golden Mile | 73 |
Figure 6.13 Photomicrographs of Typical Skarn from Golden Mile (Sample GR-427 | 78 |
Figure 6.14 Conceptual Model for Formation of the Golden Mile Deposit | 80 |
Figure 7.1 Resource Areas and Drill Ready Targets Identified on the Golden Mile Property | 81 |
Figure 7.2 Golden Mile Property Map Highlighting Hydrothermal Alteration and Exploration Target Areas | 83 |
Figure 7.3 Location Map for Diamond Core (including MET) and RC Holes Drilled by GRCN at the Main Zone of the Golden Mile Property | 85 |
Figure 8.1 2020-2021 SRM Performance for DDH | 97 |
Figure 8.2 2020-2021 SRM Performance for RC | 98 |
Figure 8.3 2020-2021Blank Material Performance | 99 |
Figure 8.4 Au Field Duplicate Control Plot | 100 |
Figure 8.5 Au Min Max Field Duplicate Control Plot | 100 |
Figure 9.1 Location Map of GRCN Rock Chip Check Samples Collected from the Golden Mile Property | 104 |
Figure 10.1 Example of Cyanide Bottle Roll Test Results for GRCN Check Sample #3082802 | 109 |
Figure 10.2 Head Screen Analyses Showing Cumulative Weight Percent Passing Crush Size | 117 |
Figure 10.3 Overall Gold Extraction for the Golden Mile Bottle Roll Tests | 123 |
8
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 10.4 Bottle Roll Test Results Showing % Gold Extraction During Leach Period | 124 |
Figure 10.5 Bottle Roll Test Results Showing % Silver Extraction During Leach Period | 124 |
Figure 10.6 Column Leach Test Apparatus | 125 |
Figure 10.7 Cyanide Leach Test Work. Gold Extraction vs. Days of Leach | 126 |
Figure 11.1 3D Isometric View Looking Northwest at Golden Mile Drill Holes | 131 |
Figure 11.2 Plot of RQD vs. Elevation | 133 |
Figure 11.3 Aerial Photometry with Ground Control Points | 134 |
Figure 11.4 3D Isometric Geologic Model View Looking Northwest showing the Main Zone are of the Golden Mile Property | 135 |
Figure 11.5 Plot of Constrained Assay Sample Lengths | 136 |
Figure 11.6 RC vs. DDH Drilling Results | 137 |
Figure 11.7 Log-Probability Plots of Composite Capping Thresholds | 138 |
Figure 11.8 Main Zone Variography | 139 |
Figure 11.9 Typical Cross-section of Golden Mile Main Zone Looking NW Showing Gold Grades | 141 |
Figure 11.10 3D Isometric View of the Optimized Pit Shell for Golden Mile Deposit | 143 |
Figure 20.1 Map of the Properties in the Vicinity of the Golden Mile Property | 153 |
9
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
1 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1 | Introduction |
This is an Amended Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary (TRS) for GRC Nevada Inc. (GRCN), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortitude Gold Corporation (FGC), on its 100%-controlled Golden Mile property, an advanced exploration property in Mineral County, Nevada. The report provides a summary of the detailed assessment of Mineral Resources and other relevant considerations of the Golden Mile property.
On October 31, 2018, the SEC announced that it was adopting amendments to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, and related guidance, under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the new rules (“New Rules”), a registrant with material mining operations must disclose specified information in Securities Act and Exchange Act filings concerning its Mineral Resources, in addition to its Mineral Reserves. The new rules required a registrant to comply with the new rules during its first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021. GRCN and FGC have adopted the New Rules as required and will disclose the estimate of resources contained herein in a future SEC filing.
1.2 | Property Description and Ownership |
The Golden Mile property is located within the Bell Mining District (also known as the Cedar Mountain District), Mineral County, west-central Nevada. The property lies along the northeast foothills of the Cedar Mountain Range and the closest towns with full services are Hawthorne located 80 km (50 mi) to the west and Tonopah located 88 km (55 mi) to the southeast. The property has good connections to the infrastructure of west-central Nevada, with access roads to the property linking to Nevada state route 361 and US Route 95, the main highway between Reno and Las Vegas. The approximate center of the Main Zone deposit area on the Golden Mile property is Latitude 38° 30.69' North and Longitude 117° 45.98'W.
The property area covers approximately 4,780 hectares (11,811 acres) and consists of 599 contiguous unpatented lode mineral claims and 5 patented mineral claims, 4 owned and one leased. The unpatented claims are situated on land owned by the U.S. government and administered by the BLM. There are no Tribal, State of Nevada or U.S. Forest Service lands within the property area.
GRCN controls 100% interest in all unpatented claims and 4 of the patented claims comprising the Golden Mile property, subject to a net smelter return royalty (NSR) of 3% on future production from the property claims. A separate, single patented claim (Copper Queen) is held under lease by GRCN. This lease has annual advance royalty payments of $10,000 and a 3% NSR payable to the lessors.
10
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
1.3 | Geology and Mineralization |
The Golden Mile property is located in the central portion of the Walker Lane trend, a major northwest-aligned structurally deformed zone on the western border of Nevada characterized by a series of closely spaced dextral strike-slip faults active throughout much of the middle to late Cenozoic. It is a complex accommodation zone up to 300 km (186 mi) wide and approximately 1,000 km (620 mi) long positioned between the western boundary of the extensional Basin and Range Province and the Sierra Nevada microplate. This area remains tectonically active at present.
Regionally, the Golden Mile property is situated along the eastern flanks of the Cedar Mountains. The Cedar Mountains are underlain by Triassic to Jurassic aged carbonates and clastic rocks which have been intruded by Cretaceous to Tertiary diorite to granitic intrusive rocks. Quartz monzonite intrusives are most common. These rocks are overlain by Miocene to Pliocene age rhyolitic to basaltic volcanics and volcaniclastics. Miocene-Pliocene lake beds, including diatomite deposits, lap onto the edge of the range. Quaternary alluvium largely consisting of alluvial fans spreading from major drainages into adjacent valleys covers much of region. Large-scale folding of basement rocks have been mapped within the range which may be associated with the Sevier Orogeny. The main regional structure is an easterly plunging overturned syncline traceable 13 km (8 mi) to the east. Principal faults on a regional scale are Tertiary-aged northwest-trending strike-slip faults associated with the Walker Lane trend.
Locally, the oldest rocks are the Triassic Luning Formation, a thin bedded to massive sedimentary sequence of calcareous siltstone, thin- to medium-bedded limestone and dolomitic limestone, argillite and sandstone. The Luning Formation is unconformably overlain by Jurassic-age siliciclastic and lesser calcareous sedimentary rocks of the Dunlap Formation. Both formations have been folded with bedding that is now steeply- to sub-vertically inclined.
The sedimentary units have been intruded by various granitoid stocks, sills and dikes that include quartz diorite, granodiorite, quartz monzonite and felsic quartz-feldspar porphyry. The intrusive rocks play a role in the gold mineralization. The property is locally covered by Tertiary volcanic rocks, consisting mostly of a bimodal suite of felsic to mafic flows and tuffs.
Gold mineralization is variably associated with various skarn styles of mineralization, dominantly as calc-silicate skarn, magnetite skarn, more structurally controlled sericitic equivalents, and in limonite-calcite-silica stockworks within the distal brittle host rocks. Copper accompanies the gold mineralization associated with magnetite skarn locally. The magnetite skarn in the area known as the “Main Zone” at Golden Mile was the primary source of the limited amount of historical production on the property. Recent studies, however, suggest that steep, NW-SE striking structures may be the first order control of economic gold mineralization.
11
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
1.4 | Exploration |
The Golden Mile property has had a considerable amount of recent exploration activity including mapping, surface and underground sampling, geophysical surveys and drilling. A total of 20,158.2 m (66,131 ft) of air rotary, reverse circulation (RC), and diamond core drilling has been performed at the Golden Mile property prior to acquisition by GRCN. This included work by Standard Slag, the Elmwood JV, Battle Mountain, USMX, Teck, Cordex, Roscan and Kinross companies. The vast majority of the drilling has been directed towards the Main Zone, located on the patented mineral claims.
Prior to GRCN’s acquisition, Kinross Gold USA Inc. (Kinross) had identified at least 11 gold prospect sites on the Golden Mile property. Upon acquisition, GRCN immediately began evaluation of these targets for exploration. GRCN also utilized spectral data for vectoring to hydrothermal alteration and mineral-bearing rocks for ground follow-up. Potential mineral targets are mostly aligned with major EW and NW-trending structures and have spectral and vegetation anomalies. The Golden Mile Main Zone deposit and Spring (PS) mineral occurence (a satellite gold mineralized zone along the northwest trend) are considered the highest priority prospects with already delineated resource potential.
In late 2020 and early 2021, GRCN completed 14 diamond core drill holes totaling of 1,719.7 m (5,642 ft) at the Golden Mile property. This drilling was directed towards the Main Zone located on the patented mineral claims with primary objectives to confirm historic drill assays and geological data collected by previous explorers, conduct geological and resource modeling and to collect representative mineralized ore grade samples in the Main Zone area in sufficient quantity to conduct metallurgical testing. Significant results from GRCN’s drilling included up to 3.60 grams per metric tonne (g/t) Au (0.11 ounce per short ton (opst) Au) over 20.1 m (66 ft) including 13.00 g/t Au (0.38 opst Au) over 3.0 m (10 ft) in Hole GMDD-002 and 2.77 g/t Au (0.08 opst Au) over 21.21 m (70 ft) including 8.96 g/t Au (0.26 opst Au) over 4.45 m (15 ft) in Hole GMDD-012.
From late June through August 2021, GRCN completed 42 RC drill holes totaling 4,870.7 m (15,980 ft) in the Main Zone area at Golden Mile. The goals of this program were to add to the known mineralization by testing the undrilled areas between gold-bearing intercepts returned from historic holes and for the estimation of Mineral Resources reported herein. Significant intercepts included 6.10 m (20 ft) of 5.93 g/t Au (0.173 opst) and 16.76 m (55 ft) of 3.31 g/t Au (0.097 opst) including 1.52 m (5 ft) of 27.50 g/t Au (0.803 opst) in Hole GMRC-026. Another notable intercept included 24.38 m (80 ft) of 1.69 g/t Au (0.049 opst) including 3.05 m (10 ft) of 5.92 g/t Au (0.173 opst) in Hole GMRC-013.
1.5 | Metallurgical Testing |
Preliminary metallurgical testing was completed by Kappes, Cassidy & Associates (KCA) in 1982. Four cyanide bottle roll leach tests were run with recoveries varying from 81.4% to 87% on ‐6 mesh oxidized drill cuttings.
12
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
In 2020, GRCN had cyanide bottle roll leach tests conducted by Inspectorate on six representative surface rock chip samples collected during the initial property visit. Gold recoveries ranged from 53% to 100% averaging 82%. Silver recoveries ranged from 48% to 73% averaging 64%.
In 2021, GRCN completed four PQ-size core holes in the Main Zone deposit at Golden Mile for metallurgical testing. Metallurgical composite samples were sent to the KCA facility in Reno, Nevada for the purpose to evaluate process requirements to recover gold using conventional heap leaching technology. The test work completed on these composites consisted of head screen analysis (including, whole rock and QXRD), screen analysis by size fraction, comminution, bottle roll, agglomeration, percent slump and final apparent bulk density measurements and column leach testing.
The extraction results of the KCA 2021 bottle roll tests showed gold recoveries ranging from 38% to 94% with finer fractions (<0.075 mm; 0.003 in) typically between 90% and 94%. Silver recoveries ranged from 33% to 64% with finer fractions (<0.075 mm; 0.003 in) around 61%. Leach kinetics for both 2020 and 2021 cyanide bottle roll leach tests were relatively fast achieving plus 65% of the total gold recovery in 2 hours.
Column leach test work was conducted on the 2021 composite core samples crushed to a target size of 80% passing 25 mm and 80% passing 6.3 mm. Gold extraction for coarse (<37.5 mm) column leach tests was 80% based on calculated heads which ranged from 1.639 g/t (0.048 opst) to 1.806 g/t (0.053 opst) Au. The sodium cyanide consumptions ranged from 1.70 kg (3.75 lb) to 1.92 kg (4.23 lb) per metric tonne. Gold extractions for the fine (<9.5 mm; 1.5 in) column leach tests ranged from 51% to 86% based on calculated heads which ranged from 1.328 g/t (0.039 opst) to 4.506 g/t (0.132 opst) Au. Silver extractions were generally good, ranging from 53% to 92% but typically in the mid 70% to mid 80% range. The column leach test results exhibited rapid leach kinetics with 80% to 90% of total gold and silver recovery occurring in the first 10 days of leaching.
1.6 | Mineral Resource Estimates |
The modeling and estimation of Mineral Resources presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of September 30, 2021.
As part of its modernization of the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, the SEC is adopting the Combined Reserves International Reporting Standards Committee (CRIRSCO) framework for reporting Mineral Resources. According to CRIRSCO, a Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of intrinsic economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust (a deposit) in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. Portions of a deposit that do not have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction must not be included in a Mineral Resource.
13
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The modeling and estimation of Mineral Resources utilized a portion of the drill hole database compiled by GRCN containing 150 unique collar records and consisting of:
● | RC: 131 reverse circulation drill holes for 14,597 m (47,889 ft) |
● | DDH: 19 diamond drill holes for 2,843 m (9,327 ft) |
Mineral Resource modeling was carried out on capped composites using Inverse Distance Cubed (“ID3”) and Nearest Neighbor (“NN”) estimation methods. A minimum of four and a maximum of nine composites were used for estimation, with a maximum of three composites from a single drill hole. The search ellipsoid oriented parallel with each defined mineralization domain and extending a maximum of 91.4 m (300 ft) The major and semi-major axes approximate the average strike and dip directions of the mineralization. Both gold and silver were modeled and estimated, but Ag is not included in the Mineral Resource due to limited information on this commodity.
Mineral Resources at Golden Mile are further defined by GRCN as Mineral Resources within a constraining pit shell and above a defined cutoff value. The Mineral Resources reported herein have been constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman (LG) optimized pit shell and reported at a cutoff grade of 0.34 g/t Au (0.010 opst). The cutoff grades used are marginal cutoff grades based on 2020 actual costs for FGC’s nearby Isabella Pearl open pit, heap leach mine in Nevada, a mining operation similar in scope to that envisioned for Golden Mile.
Indicated Mineral Resources reported at Golden Mile contain 2.16 million tonnes (2.38 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.13 g/t (0.033 opst). Inferred Mineral Resources reported are 2.40 million tonnes (2.64 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.10 g/t (0.032 opst) (Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 Mineral Resource Inventory at Golden Mile, Mineral County, Nevada, USA (as of September 30, 2021)1 2 3 4
Class | Tonnes | Short Tons | Au (g/t) | Au (opst) | Au (oz) |
Indicated | 2,160,000 | 2,380,000 | 1.13 | 0.033 | 78,500 |
Inferred | 2,400,000 | 2,640,000 | 1.10 | 0.032 | 84,500 |
1. | Reported at a cutoff of 0.34 g/t Au (0.010 opst). |
2. | Whole block diluted estimates are reported within an optimized pit shell. |
3. | Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
4. | Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. |
1.7 | Interpretation and Conclusions |
Golden Mile is an advanced exploration property hosting a moderate-sized, mineralized gold (+ silver-copper-iron) system with potential for developing gold resources and additional exploration targets. Historic surface and underground rock sampling, together with previous and current drilling, have defined significant, high-grade, gold values locally in association with magnetite skarn with minor silver-copper mineralization.
14
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Mineral Resources described herein have been delineated by appropriate drilling and/or sampling to establish continuity and supports an estimate of tonnage and an average grade of the selected metals. GRCN has evaluated and performed verification of the historic and recent Golden Mile drill hole database and considers the assay data to be adequate for the estimation of the Mineral Resources. Golden Mile has a favorable economic projection based on Mineral Resources estimated and reported herein.
Several factors may affect the estimation of Mineral Resources including changes to the geological, geotechnical and geometallurgical models. In particular, the resource model showed a large proportion of the contained metal is derived from a small number of samples and fracture style mineralization may overestimate metal content at the mining scale. Additonal infill drilling to convert material to a higher classification is recommended to mitigate these risks.
1.8 | Recommendations |
The QP’s preparing this report for GRCN recommend that the Golden Mile property proceed with a prefeasibility study to move the property forward to a production decision.
The conceptualized plan being evaluated is open pit mining and heap leaching of the gold deposit, taking the gold to carbon stage from a process plant to be built at Golden Mile, and then hauling the carbon for further processing at the parent company’s permitted and operating absorption/desorption recovery (ADR) facility at its nearby Isabella Pearl mine for final doré production.
Review of recently completed metallurgical test results needs to be finalized, together with on-going engineering, base line and background studies which include process facility layout, open-pit design and infrastructure evaluations. Some additional studies are also recommended that may improve value and optimizations including additional drilling to convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves, and additional geotechnical studies to possibly steepen pit slopes.
The Golden Mile mineralization remains open on strike and at depth. For future exploration, particularly in the vicinity of the Main Zone deposit north of the Road Fault, it will be important to better understand the structure of the northwest-trending gold-bearing quartz-pyrite-chlorite veins and the stratigraphy and resulting alteration mineralogy of the Dunlap and Luning Formations. This would include additional surface mapping to define location and geometry of carbonate host rocks and preparation of stratigraphic cross-sections to help define the subsurface extent of the carbonate host rocks, particularly near the granodiorite-quartz feldspar porphyry intrusions. Mineralization appears to extend north and northwest under post-mineral volcanic cover as well as open at depth and additional drilling is also warranted in these directions. Soil sampling at 100-meter orthogonal spacings should also be undertaken over the area south of the Tertiary volcanic cover. Geophysical studies, especially magnetic surveys, are also useful in tracing the granodiorite and quartz feldspar porphyry intrusions beneath volcanic cover.
The proposed exploration program for the Golden Mile property is shown in Table 1.2. The estimated cost of the recommended exploration program is $2.5 M. The proposed budget includes for 12,192 m (40,000 ft) of RC drilling for Mineral Resource expansion and exploration outside of the Main Zone deposit area.
15
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Recommendations for continued engineering, geotechnical, metallurgical, base line and background studies at Golden Mile are shown in Table 1.3. The estimated cost of the recommendations total $1.0 M.
Table 1.2 Budget for Proposed Exploration at Golden Mile Property
Description | Total Cost ($) |
Salaries and Wages | 120,000 |
Vacation Days | 3,000 |
Health Insurance | 3,000 |
401K Expense | 3,600 |
Payroll Taxes Employer | 12,000 |
Workers Compensation Insurance | 6,000 |
Contractors Drilling (RC) – 12,192 m (40,000 ft) | 1,100,000 |
Contractors Maintenance | 60,000 |
Contractors Services | 200,000 |
Material Used by Contractors | 200,000 |
Topographical Studies | 12,000 |
Environmental Studies | 60,000 |
Laboratory Assays | 500,000 |
Maintenance Vehicles | 600 |
Software & Licenses (non-cap) | 3,000 |
Consulting Services | 60,000 |
Airfare | 1,200 |
Lodging | 12,000 |
Meals | 6,000 |
Other Travel Expenses | 6,000 |
Gasoline | 3,000 |
Field Supplies and Materials | 36,000 |
Allocation of Labor Costs | 90,000 |
Golden Mile Property Exploration Total | 2,497,400 |
Table 1.3 Budget for Proposed Technical Studies at Golden Mile Property
Description | Total Cost ($) |
Core Drilling & Geotechnical Study | 300,000 |
Blasting Fragmentation Study | 50,000 |
Metallurgical Test Work | 60,000 |
Geometallurgical Study | 40,000 |
Waste Rock Characterization | 30,000 |
Hydrogeologic Study | 20,000 |
Water Well Drilling | 400,000 |
Monitor Well Drilling | 100,000 |
Total | 1,000,000 |
16
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
2 | INTRODUCTION |
2.1 | Terms of Reference and Purpose of Report |
On October 31, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) adopted amendments to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, and related guidance, which are currently set forth in Item 102 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and in Industry Guide 7 (SEC, 1992, 2018 a, b). The amendments are intended to provide investors with a more comprehensive understanding of a registrant’s mining properties, which should help them make more informed investment decisions. The amendments also will more closely align the Commission’s disclosure requirements and policies for mining properties with current industry and global regulatory practices and standards, as embodied by the Committee for Reserves International Reporting Standards (“CRIRSCO”).
A registrant that, pursuant to §§ 229.1300 through 229.1305 (subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K) referred to simply as “S-K 1300” in this report, discloses information concerning its Mineral Resource or Mineral Reserves must file a TRS by one or more qualified persons that, for each material property, identifies and summarizes the scientific and technical information and conclusions reached concerning an initial assessment used to support disclosure of Mineral Resources, or concerning a preliminary or final feasibility study used to support disclosure of Mineral Reserves. A registrant is required to comply with the new rules during its first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.
This report was prepared as an Initial Assessment TRS in accordance with S-K 1300 for GRCN Nevada Inc. (GRCN), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortitude Gold Corporation (FGC) on the Golden Mile property located in Mineral County, Nevada. The purpose of this TRS is to review the geology, mineralization and previous work on the property, provide Mineral Resource estimates and prepare recommendations for further work.
The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort by the qualified persons, based on 1) information available at the time of preparation, 2) data supplied by outside sources, and 3) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. The responsibility for this disclosure remains with GRCN.
2.2 | Qualifications of Qualified Persons |
The qualified persons preparing this report are specialists in the fields of geology, exploration, and Mineral Resource estimation and classification. The following individuals, by virtue of their education, experience and professional association, are considered Qualified Persons (QP) for this report and are members in good standing of appropriate professional institutions. The QPs are either employees of FGC, the parent
17
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
company of GRCN, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FGC, and therefore, not independent of GRCN, or an independent consultant, independent of GRCN. QP certificates of authors are provided in Appendix B.
Mr. Brown graduated with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree in Geology from New Mexico State University in 1987, obtained a Graduate Diploma in Engineering (Mining) in 1997 from the University of the Witwatersrand and a Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Engineering (Civil) from the University of the Witwatersrand in 2005. He is registered with Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (EGBC) as a Professional Geoscientist and the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME) as a Registered Member. Mr. Brown has also worked as an Underground Mine Geologist, Mineral Resource Manager, Resident Geologist and Chief Geologist at several mines in South Africa operated by Anglo American, Anglogold and De Beers. From 2004 to 2017, Mr. Brown was a Consulting Geologist specializing in Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimations and reporting. In 2017, he joined GRCN as Senior Resource Geologist. On July 1, 2021, Mr. Brown resigned from GRCN and is now independent of GRCN and FGC.
Mr. Devlin holds a B.Sc. degree with honors in Geology, 1981, and a M.Sc., 1987, from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver Canada. He is also a Professional Geologist registered with EGBC and is a Member of the SME and Fellow of both the Society of Economic Geologist (SEG) and the Geological Association of Canada (GAC). Mr. Devlin has worked 40 years in both exploration and mine production which includes working for several USA-companies, including US Borax and Chemical Corp., Hecla Mining Company and Gold Resource Corporation (GRC). From 2013 through 2020, he served as Vice President of Exploration for GRC, responsible for all exploration activities at their Oaxaca Mexico and Nevada operations. On March 1, 2021, Mr. Devlin assumed the role of Vice President of Exploration for FGC, responsible for all exploration activities of the company.
Ms. Lester holds a B.Sc. in Geology and a M.Sc. in Geology from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota. Ms. Lester’s industry experiences span more than 20 years and are rooted by traditional field techniques, best practices, and supplemented by modern technologies/research and includes extensive geologic mapping, hydrologic investigations, drill program design, interpretation and management, 3-D modeling, and scoping, prefeasibility, and resource and reserve reporting. Ms. Lester’s background in mining and exploration includes positions ranging from Independent Consultant, Exploration Geologist, Project Manager, and Chief Geologist for companies including Hecla Mining Company, Patagonia Gold S.A., Gold Reserve Inc. and GRC. From 2014 through 2020, she served as Chief Geologist for GRC, overseeing exploration activities at their Oaxaca Mexico and Nevada operations. On January 1, 2021, Ms. Lester assumed the role of Chief Geologist for FGC, overseeing exploration activities of the company.
Technical data and information used in the preparation of this report also included some documents prepared by third party contractors. The authors sourced information from referenced documents as cited in the text and listed in References section of this report.
18
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
2.3 | Details of Inspection |
The QP’s referenced above and in Appendix B have visited the Golden Mile property on numerous occasions since 2019. Historic mineralized workings were examined as well as the location of many historic drill collars, mainly drilled by Cordex Exploration Company (Cordex). The authors have also examined data from previous workers including skeleton core from a five‐hole diamond drilling program conducted in 2011 by Roscan Minerals Corporation (Roscan) and chip trays containing reverse circulation drill cuttings completed by Battle Mountain Gold Corporation (BMG) from 1987 to 1989 and by Cordex during 2006 and 2007.
2.4 | Sources of Information |
Information reviewed for this report includes published and unpublished reports, maps, geochemical, geophysical, and other data available from past workers. The records and data from past workers are not entirely complete, however, much of the drill data geophysical, geochemical, and geologic data are available. This report is relying on property reports prepared by Meghan O'Donnell for Columbus Gold Corporation (Columbus) in 2006, and a more recent property report completed by Robert Suda on behalf of Portage Mineral Inc. in 2009 (O’Donnell, 2006; Suda, 2009). This TRS draws much of its content from the previous historical reports.
2.5 | Effective Date |
The effective date of this report is September 30, 2021.
2.6 | Units of Measure |
The metric system for weights and units has been used in this report with tons reported in metric tons (“tonnes”) consisting of 1,000 kilograms (kg) per tonne (unless otherwise called out and noted as short tons). Gold and silver ounces are reported in troy ounces converted using 31.1035 grams (g) per troy ounce. All currency is in U.S. dollars ($) unless otherwise stated. The capital letter M is used for millions of $ . The abbreviation, g/t is used for grams per tonne.
19
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
3 | PROPERTY DESCRIPTION |
This section addresses the property land holdings, corporate agreements, existing environmental liabilities and the permitting process.
3.1 | Property Location |
The Golden Mile property is located within the Bell Mining District (also known as the Cedar Mountain District), Mineral County, west-central Nevada. The property lies along the northeast foothills of the Cedar Mountain Range and the closest towns with full services are Hawthorne located 80 km (50 mi) to the west and Tonopah located 88 km (55 mi) to the southeast (Fig. 3.1). The property has good connections to the infrastructure of west-central Nevada, with access roads to the property linking to Nevada state route 361 and US Route 95, the main highway between Reno and Las Vegas. The Golden Mile property is located approximately 37 km (23 mi) east-southeast of GRCN’s parent company’s (FGC) Isabella Pearl mining operations.
The property is located within all or portions of the following Townships, Ranges and Sections relative to the Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian:
Township 8 North, Range 37 ½ East, Sections19,20, 28, 29,30,31, 32, and 33,
Township 7 North, Range 37 ½ East, Sections 6, 5, 4
Township 8 North, Range 37 East Sections, 36, 35,34, 27, 26, 25,22, 23, 24, 16, 15, 14 13
Township 7 North, Range 37 East Sections, 2, 1,
Township 8 North, Range 38E, Section 30, 31
Township 7 North, Range 38 East Sections 6
The approximate center of the Main Zone deposit area on the Golden Mile property is Latitude 38.51° North and Longitude 117.77° West (UTM 433,190 E, 4,262,848 N, Zone 11).
20
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 3.1 General Location Map of the Golden Mile Property
3.2 | Mineral Titles |
The property area covers approximately 4,780 hectares (11,811 acres) and consists of 599 contiguous unpatented lode mineral claims and 5 patented mineral claims, 4 owned and one leased. The unpatented claims are situated on land owned by the U.S. government and administered by the BLM. Unpatented and patented mineral claims in the property area are shown on Figure 3.2. Reviews of mineral tenure and status were completed during 2019 and 2021. A title report was prepared, and a legal land survey completed, on the patented claims in 2020. The property boundaries were georeferenced with survey data for verification/validation within company database. A list of unpatented mineral lode claims within the property boundary controlled by GRCN is in Table 3.1 and patented mineral claims are in Table 3.2. The mineral claim listings are current as of September 1, 2021.
There are no Tribal, State of Nevada or U.S. Forest Service lands within the property area.
21
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 3.2 Golden Mile Property Mineral Claims Map (patented claims insert)
Table 3.1 List of Unpatented Lode Mineral Claims for the Golden Mile Property
Claim Name | Type | BLM MLRS | Loc Date | Mineral | Nye | Owner | Status | Acquisition History |
CMA 3 | Unpat Lode | NV101609830 | 12/7/1991 | 101542 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
CMA 4 | Unpat Lode | NV101458938 | 12/7/1991 | 101543 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
CMA 5 | Unpat Lode | NV101609971 | 12/7/1991 | 101544 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
CMA 6 | Unpat Lode | NV101754041 | 12/7/1991 | 101545 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
CMA 7 | Unpat Lode | NV101494167 | 12/7/1991 | 101546 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
CMA 8 | Unpat Lode | NV101754149 | 12/7/1991 | 101547 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
CMA 9 | Unpat Lode | NV101492992 | 12/7/1991 | 101548 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 10 | Unpat Lode | NV101404482 | 10/17/1994 | 110508 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 11 | Unpat Lode | NV101478558 | 10/17/1994 | 110509 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 12 | Unpat Lode | NV101406480 | 10/17/1994 | 110510 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 13 | Unpat Lode | NV101759418 | 10/17/1994 | 110511 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 14 | Unpat Lode | NV101403896 | 10/17/1994 | 110512 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 22 | Unpat Lode | NV101523234 | 10/18/1994 | 110520 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 23 | Unpat Lode | NV101459790 | 2/13/1995 | 110521 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 24 | Unpat Lode | NV101523491 | 2/13/1995 | 110522 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 26 | Unpat Lode | NV101523484 | 2/13/1995 | 100524 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 1 | Unpat Lode | NV101624019 | 1/15/2004 | 130128 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
MA 2 | Unpat Lode | NV101624020 | 1/15/2004 | 130129 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
22
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
MA 21 | Unpat Lode | NV101624021 | 1/15/2004 | 130130 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
Cloud 1 | Unpat Lode | NV101355910 | 8/15/2014 | 159810 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
Cloud 2 | Unpat Lode | NV101355911 | 8/15/2014 | 159811 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
Cloud 3 | Unpat Lode | NV101356883 | 8/15/2014 | 159812 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From Cedar Mountains LLC 6/2020 |
SP 1 | Unpat Lode | NV101543132 | 9/24/2016 | 164695 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 2 | Unpat Lode | NV101543133 | 9/24/2016 | 164696 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 3 | Unpat Lode | NV101553552 | 7/31/2019 8/7/2019 | 171048 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 4 | Unpat Lode | NV101543134 | 9/24/2016 | 164698 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 5 | Unpat Lode | NV101543135 | 9/24/2016 | 164699 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 6 | Unpat Lode | NV101543136 | 9/24/2016 | 164700 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 7 | Unpat Lode | NV101543137 | 10/1/2016 | 164701 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 8 | Unpat Lode | NV101543138 | 10/1/2016 | 164702 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 9 | Unpat Lode | NV101543139 | 10/1/2016 | 164703 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 10 | Unpat Lode | NV101543140 | 10/1/2016 | 164704 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 11 | Unpat Lode | NV101543141 | 10/1/2016 | 164705 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 12 | Unpat Lode | NV101543142 | 10/1/2016 | 164706 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 13 | Unpat Lode | NV101543143 | 10/1/2016 | 164707 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 14 | Unpat Lode | NV101543144 | 10/1/2016 | 164708 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 15 | Unpat Lode | NV101543145 | 10/1/2016 | 164712 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 16 | Unpat Lode | NV101543146 | 10/1/2016 | 164715 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 17 | Unpat Lode | NV101543147 | 10/1/2016 | 164716 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
SP 18 | Unpat Lode | NV101543148 | 9/24/2016 | 164717 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
PS 23 | Unpat Lode | NV101543132 | 10/1/2016 | 164710 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
PS 27 | Unpat Lode | NV101543133 | 10/1/2016 | 164714 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
PS 38 | Unpat Lode | NV101553552 | 10/1/2016 | 164709 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
PS 40 | Unpat Lode | NV101543134 | 10/1/2016 | 164711 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
PS 42 | Unpat Lode | NV101543135 | 10/1/2016 | 164713 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 1 | Unpat Lode | NV101754761 | 10/12/2016 | 164734 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 2 | Unpat Lode | NV101754762 | 10/12/2016 | 164735 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 3 | Unpat Lode | NV101756087 | 10/12/2016 | 164736 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 4 | Unpat Lode | NV101756088 | 10/12/2016 | 164737 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 5 | Unpat Lode | NV101756089 | 10/12/2016 | 164738 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 6 | Unpat Lode | NV101756090 | 10/12/2016 | 164739 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 7 | Unpat Lode | NV101756091 | 10/12/2016 | 164740 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 8 | Unpat Lode | NV101756092 | 10/12/2016 | 164741 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 9 | Unpat Lode | NV101756093 | 10/11/2016 | 164742 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 10 | Unpat Lode | NV101756094 | 10/11/2016 | 164743 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 11 | Unpat Lode | NV101756095 | 10/11/2016 | 164744 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 12 | Unpat Lode | NV101756096 | 10/11/2016 | 164745 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 13 | Unpat Lode | NV101756097 | 10/11/2016 | 164746 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 14 | Unpat Lode | NV101756098 | 10/11/2016 | 164747 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 15 | Unpat Lode | NV101756099 | 10/11/2016 | 164748 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 16 | Unpat Lode | NV101756100 | 10/11/2016 | 164749 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 17 | Unpat Lode | NV101756101 | 10/11/2016 | 164750 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 18 | Unpat Lode | NV101756102 | 10/11/2016 | 164751 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 19 | Unpat Lode | NV101756103 | 10/11/2016 | 164752 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 20 | Unpat Lode | NV101756104 | 10/11/2016 | 164753 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 21 | Unpat Lode | NV101756105 | 10/11/2016 | 164754 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 22 | Unpat Lode | NV101756106 | 10/11/2016 | 164755 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 23 | Unpat Lode | NV101756107 | 10/11/2016 | 164756 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 24 | Unpat Lode | NV101757430 | 10/11/2016 | 164757 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 25 | Unpat Lode | NV101757431 | 10/11/2016 | 164758 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 26 | Unpat Lode | NV101757432 | 10/11/2016 | 164759 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 27 | Unpat Lode | NV101757433 | 10/11/2016 | 164760 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 28 | Unpat Lode | NV101757434 | 10/11/2016 | 164761 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 29 | Unpat Lode | NV101757435 | 10/11/2016 | 164762 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 30 | Unpat Lode | NV101757436 | 10/11/2016 | 164763 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 31 | Unpat Lode | NV101757437 | 10/12/2016 | 164764 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 32 | Unpat Lode | NV101757438 | 10/12/2016 | 164765 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 33 | Unpat Lode | NV101757439 | 10/12/2016 | 164766 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 34 | Unpat Lode | NV101757440 | 10/12/2016 | 164767 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 35 | Unpat Lode | NV101757441 | 10/12/2016 | 164768 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 36 | Unpat Lode | NV101757442 | 10/12/2016 | 164769 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 37 | Unpat Lode | NV101757443 | 10/12/2016 | 164770 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 38 | Unpat Lode | NV101757444 | 10/12/2016 | 164771 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 39 | Unpat Lode | NV101781502 | 10/12/2016 | 164772 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 40 | Unpat Lode | NV101781503 | 10/12/2016 | 164773 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 41 | Unpat Lode | NV101781504 | 10/12/2016 | 164774 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 42 | Unpat Lode | NV101781505 | 10/12/2016 | 164775 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 43 | Unpat Lode | NV101781506 | 10/11/2016 | 164776 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
23
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GM 44 | Unpat Lode | NV101781507 | 10/11/2016 | 164777 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 45 | Unpat Lode | NV101781508 | 10/11/2016 | 164778 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 46 | Unpat Lode | NV101781509 | 10/11/2016 | 164779 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 47 | Unpat Lode | NV101541409 | 10/11/2016 | 164780 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 48 | Unpat Lode | NV101541410 | 10/11/2016 | 164781 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 49 | Unpat Lode | NV101541411 | 10/13/2016 | 164782 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 50 | Unpat Lode | NV101541412 | 10/13/2016 | 164783 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 51 | Unpat Lode | NV101541413 | 10/13/2016 | 164784 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 52 | Unpat Lode | NV101541414 | 10/13/2016 | 164785 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 53 | Unpat Lode | NV101541415 | 10/13/2016 | 164786 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 54 | Unpat Lode | NV101541416 | 10/13/2016 | 164787 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 55 | Unpat Lode | NV101541417 | 10/13/2016 | 164788 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 56 | Unpat Lode | NV101541418 | 10/13/2016 | 164789 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 57 | Unpat Lode | NV101541419 | 10/13/2016 | 164790 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 58 | Unpat Lode | NV101541420 | 10/13/2016 | 164791 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 59 | Unpat Lode | NV101541421 | 10/13/2016 | 164792 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 60 | Unpat Lode | NV101541422 | 10/13/2016 | 164793 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 61 | Unpat Lode | NV101541423 | 10/13/2016 | 164794 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 62 | Unpat Lode | NV101541424 | 10/13/2016 | 164795 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 63 | Unpat Lode | NV101541425 | 10/13/2016 | 164796 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 64 | Unpat Lode | NV101541426 | 10/13/2016 | 164797 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 65 | Unpat Lode | NV101541427 | 10/13/2016 | 164798 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 66 | Unpat Lode | NV101783413 | 2/16/2017 | 165548 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 67 | Unpat Lode | NV101783414 | 2/16/2017 | 165549 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 68 | Unpat Lode | NV101783415 | 2/16/2017 | 165550 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 69 | Unpat Lode | NV101783416 | 2/16/2017 | 165551 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 70 | Unpat Lode | NV101783417 | 2/16/2017 | 165552 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 71 | Unpat Lode | NV101783418 | 2/16/2017 | 165553 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 72 | Unpat Lode | NV101783419 | 2/16/2017 | 165554 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 73 | Unpat Lode | NV101783420 | 2/16/2017 | 165555 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 74 | Unpat Lode | NV101783421 | 2/15/2017 | 165556 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 75 | Unpat Lode | NV101783422 | 2/15/2017 | 165557 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 76 | Unpat Lode | NV101783423 | 2/15/2017 | 165558 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 77 | Unpat Lode | NV101783424 | 2/15/2017 | 165559 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 78 | Unpat Lode | NV101783425 | 2/15/2017 | 165560 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 79 | Unpat Lode | NV101783426 | 2/15/2017 | 165561 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 80 | Unpat Lode | NV101783427 | 2/15/2017 | 165562 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 81 | Unpat Lode | NV101783428 | 2/15/2017 | 165563 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 82 | Unpat Lode | NV101783429 | 2/15/2017 | 165564 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 83 | Unpat Lode | NV101783430 | 2/15/2017 | 165565 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 84 | Unpat Lode | NV101784638 | 2/15/2017 | 165566 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 85 | Unpat Lode | NV101784639 | 2/15/2017 | 165567 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 86 | Unpat Lode | NV101784640 | 2/15/2017 | 165568 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 87 | Unpat Lode | NV101784641 | 2/15/2017 | 165569 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 88 | Unpat Lode | NV101784642 | 2/15/2017 | 165570 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 89 | Unpat Lode | NV101784643 | 2/15/2017 | 165571 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 90 | Unpat Lode | NV101784644 | 2/16/2017 | 165572 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 91 | Unpat Lode | NV101784645 | 2/16/2017 | 165573 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 92 | Unpat Lode | NV101784646 | 2/16/2017 | 165574 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 93 | Unpat Lode | NV101784647 | 2/16/2017 | 165575 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 94 | Unpat Lode | NV101784648 | 2/16/2017 | 165576 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 95 | Unpat Lode | NV101784649 | 2/16/2017 | 165577 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 96 | Unpat Lode | NV101784650 | 2/16/2017 | 165578 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 97 | Unpat Lode | NV101784651 | 2/16/2017 | 165579 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 98 | Unpat Lode | NV101784652 | 2/15/2017 | 165580 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 99 | Unpat Lode | NV101784653 | 2/15/2017 | 165581 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 100 | Unpat Lode | NV101784654 | 2/15/2017 | 165582 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 101 | Unpat Lode | NV101784655 | 2/15/2017 | 165583 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 102 | Unpat Lode | NV101784656 | 2/15/2017 | 165584 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 103 | Unpat Lode | NV101784657 | 2/15/2017 | 165585 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 104 | Unpat Lode | NV101784658 | 2/16/2017 | 165586 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 105 | Unpat Lode | NV101785843 | 2/16/2017 | 165587 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 106 | Unpat Lode | NV101785844 | 2/16/2017 | 165588 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 107 | Unpat Lode | NV101785845 | 2/16/2017 | 165589 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 108 | Unpat Lode | NV101785846 | 2/16/2017 | 165590 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 109 | Unpat Lode | NV101785847 | 2/16/2017 | 165591 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 110 | Unpat Lode | NV101884786 | 2/16/2018 | 168261 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 111 | Unpat Lode | NV101884787 | 2/16/2018 | 168262 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 112 | Unpat Lode | NV101884788 | 2/16/2018 | 168263 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 113 | Unpat Lode | NV101884789 | 2/16/2018 | 168264 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 114 | Unpat Lode | NV101884790 | 2/16/2018 | 168265 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
24
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GM 115 | Unpat Lode | NV101884791 | 2/16/2018 | 168266 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 116 | Unpat Lode | NV101884792 | 2/16/2018 | 168267 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 117 | Unpat Lode | NV101884793 | 2/15/2018 | 168268 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 118 | Unpat Lode | NV101884794 | 2/15/2018 | 168269 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 119 | Unpat Lode | NV101884795 | 2/15/2018 | 168270 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 120 | Unpat Lode | NV101884796 | 2/15/2018 | 168271 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 121 | Unpat Lode | NV101884180 | 2/16/2018 | 168272 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 122 | Unpat Lode | NV101884181 | 2/15/2018 | 168273 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 123 | Unpat Lode | NV101884182 | 2/16/2018 | 168274 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 124 | Unpat Lode | NV101884183 | 2/16/2018 | 168275 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 125 | Unpat Lode | NV101884184 | 2/16/2018 | 168276 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 126 | Unpat Lode | NV101884185 | 2/16/2018 | 168277 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 127 | Unpat Lode | NV101884186 | 2/16/2018 | 168278 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 128 | Unpat Lode | NV101884187 | 2/16/2018 | 168279 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 129 | Unpat Lode | NV101884188 | 2/16/2018 | 168280 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 130 | Unpat Lode | NV101884189 | 2/16/2018 | 168281 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 131 | Unpat Lode | NV101884190 | 2/16/2018 | 168282 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 132 | Unpat Lode | NV101884191 | 2/16/2018 | 168283 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 133 | Unpat Lode | NV101884192 | 2/16/2018 | 168284 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 134 | Unpat Lode | NV101884193 | 2/16/2018 | 168285 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 135 | Unpat Lode | NV101884194 | 2/16/2018 | 168286 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 136 | Unpat Lode | NV101884195 | 2/16/2018 | 168287 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 137 | Unpat Lode | NV101884196 | 2/16/2018 | 168288 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 138 | Unpat Lode | NV101884197 | 2/16/2018 | 168289 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 139 | Unpat Lode | NV101884198 | 2/16/2018 | 168290 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 140 | Unpat Lode | NV101884199 | 2/16/2018 | 168291 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 141 | Unpat Lode | NV101884200 | 2/15/2018 | 168292 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 142 | Unpat Lode | NV101884797 | 2/15/2018 | 168293 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 143 | Unpat Lode | NV101884798 | 2/15/2018 | 168294 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 144 | Unpat Lode | NV101884799 | 2/15/2018 | 168295 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 145 | Unpat Lode | NV101884800 | 2/15/2018 | 168296 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 146 | Unpat Lode | NV101884924 | 2/15/2018 | 168297 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 147 | Unpat Lode | NV101884925 | 2/15/2018 | 168298 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 148 | Unpat Lode | NV101884926 | 2/15/2018 | 168299 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 149 | Unpat Lode | NV101884927 | 2/15/2018 | 168300 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 150 | Unpat Lode | NV101884928 | 2/15/2018 | 168301 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 151 | Unpat Lode | NV101884929 | 2/15/2018 | 168302 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 152 | Unpat Lode | NV101884930 | 2/15/2018 | 168303 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 153 | Unpat Lode | NV101884931 | 2/15/2018 | 168304 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 154 | Unpat Lode | NV101884932 | 2/15/2018 | 168305 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 155 | Unpat Lode | NV101884933 | 2/15/2018 | 168306 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 156 | Unpat Lode | NV101884934 | 2/15/2018 | 168307 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 157 | Unpat Lode | NV101884935 | 2/15/2018 | 168308 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 158 | Unpat Lode | NV101884936 | 2/15/2018 | 168309 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 159 | Unpat Lode | NV101884937 | 2/15/2018 | 168310 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 160 | Unpat Lode | NV101884938 | 2/15/2018 | 168311 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 161 | Unpat Lode | NV101884939 | 2/15/2018 | 168312 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 162 | Unpat Lode | NV101884940 | 2/15/2018 | 168313 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 163 | Unpat Lode | NV101884941 | 2/15/2018 | 168314 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 164 | Unpat Lode | NV101884942 | 2/15/2018 | 168315 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 165 | Unpat Lode | NV101884943 | 2/15/2018 | 168316 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 166 | Unpat Lode | NV101884944 | 2/15/2018 | 168317 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 167 | Unpat Lode | NV101884945 | 2/15/2018 | 168318 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 168 | Unpat Lode | NV101884946 | 2/15/2018 | 168319 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 169 | Unpat Lode | NV101884947 | 2/15/2018 | 168320 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 170 | Unpat Lode | NV101884948 | 2/15/2018 | 168321 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 171 | Unpat Lode | NV101884949 | 2/15/2018 | 168322 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 172 | Unpat Lode | NV101884950 | 2/15/2018 | 168323 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 173 | Unpat Lode | NV101884951 | 2/15/2018 | 168324 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 174 | Unpat Lode | NV101884952 | 2/15/2018 | 168325 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 175 | Unpat Lode | NV101884953 | 2/15/2018 | 168326 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 176 | Unpat Lode | NV101884954 | 2/15/2018 | 168327 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 177 | Unpat Lode | NV101884955 | 2/15/2018 | 168328 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 178 | Unpat Lode | NV101884956 | 2/15/2018 | 168329 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 179 | Unpat Lode | NV101884957 | 2/15/2018 | 168330 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 180 | Unpat Lode | NV101884958 | 2/15/2018 | 168331 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 181 | Unpat Lode | NV101884959 | 2/15/2018 | 168332 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 182 | Unpat Lode | NV101884960 | 2/15/2018 | 168333 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 183 | Unpat Lode | NV101884961 | 2/15/2018 | 168334 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 184 | Unpat Lode | NV101885534 | 2/17/2018 | 168335 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 185 | Unpat Lode | NV101885535 | 2/17/2018 | 168336 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
25
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GM 186 | Unpat Lode | NV101885536 | 2/17/2018 | 168337 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 187 | Unpat Lode | NV101885537 | 2/17/2018 | 168338 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 188 | Unpat Lode | NV101885538 | 2/17/2018 | 168339 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 189 | Unpat Lode | NV101885539 | 2/17/2018 | 168340 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 190 | Unpat Lode | NV101834201 | 2/17/2018 | 168341 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 191 | Unpat Lode | NV101834202 | 2/17/2018 | 168342 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 192 | Unpat Lode | NV101834203 | 2/17/2018 | 168343 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 193 | Unpat Lode | NV101834204 | 2/17/2018 | 168344 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 194 | Unpat Lode | NV101834205 | 2/17/2018 | 168345 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 195 | Unpat Lode | NV101834206 | 2/17/2018 | 168346 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 196 | Unpat Lode | NV101834207 | 2/17/2018 | 168347 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 197 | Unpat Lode | NV101834208 | 2/17/2018 | 168348 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 198 | Unpat Lode | NV101834209 | 2/17/2018 | 168349 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 199 | Unpat Lode | NV101834210 | 2/17/2018 | 168350 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 200 | Unpat Lode | NV101834211 | 2/17/2018 | 168351 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 201 | Unpat Lode | NV101834212 | 2/17/2018 | 168352 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 202 | Unpat Lode | NV101834213 | 2/17/2018 | 168353 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 203 | Unpat Lode | NV101834214 | 2/17/2018 | 168354 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 204 | Unpat Lode | NV101834215 | 2/17/2018 | 168355 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 205 | Unpat Lode | NV101834216 | 2/17/2018 | 168356 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 206 | Unpat Lode | NV101834217 | 2/17/2018 | 168357 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 207 | Unpat Lode | NV101834218 | 2/17/2018 | 168358 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 208 | Unpat Lode | NV101834219 | 2/17/2018 | 168359 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 209 | Unpat Lode | NV101834220 | 2/17/2018 | 168360 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 210 | Unpat Lode | NV101834221 | 2/18/2018 | 168361 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 211 | Unpat Lode | NV101834801 | 2/18/2018 | 168362 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 212 | Unpat Lode | NV101834802 | 2/18/2018 | 168363 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 213 | Unpat Lode | NV101834803 | 2/18/2018 | 168364 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 214 | Unpat Lode | NV101834804 | 2/18/2018 | 168365 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 215 | Unpat Lode | NV101834805 | 2/18/2018 | 168366 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 216 | Unpat Lode | NV101834806 | 2/18/2018 | 168367 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 217 | Unpat Lode | NV101834807 | 2/18/2018 | 168368 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 218 | Unpat Lode | NV101834808 | 2/18/2018 | 168369 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 219 | Unpat Lode | NV101834809 | 2/18/2018 | 168370 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 220 | Unpat Lode | NV101834810 | 2/18/2018 | 168371 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 221 | Unpat Lode | NV101834811 | 2/18/2018 | 168372 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 222 | Unpat Lode | NV101834812 | 2/18/2018 | 168373 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 223 | Unpat Lode | NV101834813 | 2/18/2018 | 168374 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 224 | Unpat Lode | NV101834814 | 2/18/2018 | 168375 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 225 | Unpat Lode | NV101834815 | 2/18/2018 | 168376 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 226 | Unpat Lode | NV101834816 | 2/18/2018 | 168377 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 227 | Unpat Lode | NV101834817 | 2/18/2018 | 168378 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 228 | Unpat Lode | NV101834818 | 2/18/2018 | 168379 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 229 | Unpat Lode | NV101834819 | 2/18/2018 | 168380 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 230 | Unpat Lode | NV101834820 | 2/18/2018 | 168381 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 231 | Unpat Lode | NV101834821 | 2/18/2018 | 168382 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 232 | Unpat Lode | NV101835401 | 2/18/2018 | 168383 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 233 | Unpat Lode | NV101835402 | 2/18/2018 | 168384 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 234 | Unpat Lode | NV101835403 | 2/18/2018 | 168385 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 235 | Unpat Lode | NV101835404 | 2/18/2018 | 168386 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 236 | Unpat Lode | NV101835405 | 2/18/2018 | 168387 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 237 | Unpat Lode | NV101835406 | 2/18/2018 | 168388 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 238 | Unpat Lode | NV101835407 | 2/18/2018 | 168389 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 239 | Unpat Lode | NV101835408 | 2/18/2018 | 168390 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 240 | Unpat Lode | NV101835409 | 2/18/2018 | 168391 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 241 | Unpat Lode | NV101835410 | 2/18/2018 | 168392 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 242 | Unpat Lode | NV101835411 | 2/18/2018 | 168393 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 243 | Unpat Lode | NV101835412 | 2/18/2018 | 168394 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 244 | Unpat Lode | NV101835413 | 2/18/2018 | 168395 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 245 | Unpat Lode | NV101835414 | 2/18/2018 | 168396 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 246 | Unpat Lode | NV101835415 | 2/18/2018 | 168397 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 247 | Unpat Lode | NV101835416 | 2/18/2018 | 168398 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 248 | Unpat Lode | NV101835417 | 2/18/2018 | 168399 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 249 | Unpat Lode | NV101835418 | 2/18/2018 | 168400 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 250 | Unpat Lode | NV101835419 | 2/18/2018 | 168401 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 251 | Unpat Lode | NV101835420 | 2/18/2018 | 168402 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 252 | Unpat Lode | NV101835421 | 2/18/2018 | 168403 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 253 | Unpat Lode | NV101836001 | 2/18/2018 | 168404 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 254 | Unpat Lode | NV101836002 | 2/20/2018 | 168405 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 255 | Unpat Lode | NV101836003 | 2/20/2018 | 168406 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 256 | Unpat Lode | NV101836004 | 2/20/2018 | 168407 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
26
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GM 257 | Unpat Lode | NV101836005 | 2/20/2018 | 168408 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 258 | Unpat Lode | NV101836006 | 2/20/2018 | 168409 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 259 | Unpat Lode | NV101836007 | 2/20/2018 | 168410 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 260 | Unpat Lode | NV101836008 | 2/20/2018 | 168411 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 261 | Unpat Lode | NV101836009 | 2/20/2018 | 168412 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 262 | Unpat Lode | NV101836010 | 2/20/2018 | 168413 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 263 | Unpat Lode | NV101836011 | 2/20/2018 | 168414 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 264 | Unpat Lode | NV101836012 | 2/20/2018 | 168415 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 265 | Unpat Lode | NV101836013 | 2/20/2018 | 168416 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 266 | Unpat Lode | NV101836014 | 2/20/2018 | 168417 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 267 | Unpat Lode | NV101836015 | 2/20/2018 | 168418 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 268 | Unpat Lode | NV101836016 | 2/20/2018 | 168419 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 269 | Unpat Lode | NV101836017 | 2/20/2018 | 168420 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 270 | Unpat Lode | NV101836018 | 2/20/2018 | 168421 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 271 | Unpat Lode | NV101836019 | 2/20/2018 | 168422 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 272 | Unpat Lode | NV101836020 | 2/20/2018 | 168423 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 273 | Unpat Lode | NV101836021 | 2/20/2018 | 168424 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 274 | Unpat Lode | NV101836601 | 2/20/2018 | 168425 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 275 | Unpat Lode | NV101836602 | 2/20/2018 | 168426 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 276 | Unpat Lode | NV101836603 | 2/20/2018 | 168427 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 277 | Unpat Lode | NV101836604 | 2/20/2018 | 168428 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 278 | Unpat Lode | NV101836605 | 2/20/2018 | 168429 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 279 | Unpat Lode | NV101836606 | 2/20/2018 | 168430 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 280 | Unpat Lode | NV101836607 | 2/20/2018 | 168431 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 281 | Unpat Lode | NV101836608 | 2/20/2018 | 168432 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 282 | Unpat Lode | NV101836609 | 2/20/2018 | 168433 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 283 | Unpat Lode | NV101836610 | 2/20/2018 | 168434 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 284 | Unpat Lode | NV101836611 | 2/20/2018 | 168435 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 285 | Unpat Lode | NV101836612 | 2/20/2018 | 168436 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 286 | Unpat Lode | NV101836613 | 2/20/2018 | 168437 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 287 | Unpat Lode | NV101836614 | 2/20/2018 | 168438 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 288 | Unpat Lode | NV101836615 | 2/20/2018 | 168439 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 289 | Unpat Lode | NV101836616 | 2/20/2018 | 168440 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 290 | Unpat Lode | NV101836617 | 2/20/2018 | 168441 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 291 | Unpat Lode | NV101836618 | 2/20/2018 | 168442 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 292 | Unpat Lode | NV101836619 | 2/20/2018 | 168443 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 293 | Unpat Lode | NV101836620 | 2/20/2018 | 168444 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 294 | Unpat Lode | NV101836621 | 2/20/2018 | 168445 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 295 | Unpat Lode | NV101837001 | 2/21/2018 | 168446 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 296 | Unpat Lode | NV101837002 | 2/21/2018 | 168447 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 297 | Unpat Lode | NV101837003 | 2/21/2018 | 168448 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 298 | Unpat Lode | NV101837004 | 2/21/2018 | 168449 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 299 | Unpat Lode | NV101837005 | 2/21/2018 | 168450 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 300 | Unpat Lode | NV101837006 | 2/21/2018 | 168451 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 301 | Unpat Lode | NV101837007 | 2/21/2018 | 168452 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 302 | Unpat Lode | NV101837008 | 2/21/2018 | 168453 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 303 | Unpat Lode | NV101837201 | 2/21/2018 | 168454 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 304 | Unpat Lode | NV101837202 | 2/21/2018 | 168455 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 305 | Unpat Lode | NV101837203 | 2/21/2018 | 168456 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 306 | Unpat Lode | NV101837204 | 2/21/2018 | 168457 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 307 | Unpat Lode | NV101837205 | 2/21/2018 | 168458 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 308 | Unpat Lode | NV101837206 | 2/21/2018 | 168459 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 309 | Unpat Lode | NV101837207 | 2/21/2018 | 168460 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 310 | Unpat Lode | NV101837208 | 2/21/2018 | 168461 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 311 | Unpat Lode | NV101837209 | 2/21/2018 | 168462 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 312 | Unpat Lode | NV101837210 | 2/21/2018 | 168463 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 313 | Unpat Lode | NV101837211 | 2/21/2018 | 168464 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 314 | Unpat Lode | NV101837212 | 2/21/2018 | 168465 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 315 | Unpat Lode | NV101837213 | 2/21/2018 | 168466 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 316 | Unpat Lode | NV101837601 | 2/21/2018 | 168467 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 317 | Unpat Lode | NV101837602 | 2/21/2018 | 168468 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 318 | Unpat Lode | NV101837603 | 2/21/2018 | 168469 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 319 | Unpat Lode | NV101837604 | 2/21/2018 | 168470 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 321 | Unpat Lode | NV101764810 | 9/1/2018 | 169562 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 322 | Unpat Lode | NV101764811 | 9/1/2018 | 169563 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 323 | Unpat Lode | NV101764812 | 9/1/2018 | 169564 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 324 | Unpat Lode | NV101764813 | 9/1/2018 | 169565 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 325 | Unpat Lode | NV101764814 | 9/1/2018 | 169566 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 326 | Unpat Lode | NV101764815 | 9/1/2018 | 169567 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 327 | Unpat Lode | NV101764816 | 9/1/2018 | 169568 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 328 | Unpat Lode | NV101764817 | 9/1/2018 | 169569 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
27
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GM 329 | Unpat Lode | NV101764818 | 9/1/2018 | 169570 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 330 | Unpat Lode | NV101764819 | 9/1/2018 | 169571 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 331 | Unpat Lode | NV101764820 | 9/1/2018 | 169572 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 332 | Unpat Lode | NV101764821 | 9/1/2018 | 169573 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 333 | Unpat Lode | NV101764822 | 9/1/2018 | 169574 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 334 | Unpat Lode | NV101764823 | 9/1/2018 | 169575 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 335 | Unpat Lode | NV101764824 | 9/1/2018 | 169576 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 336 | Unpat Lode | NV101764825 | 9/1/2018 | 169577 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 337 | Unpat Lode | NV101765070 | 9/1/2018 | 169578 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 338 | Unpat Lode | NV101765071 | 9/1/2018 | 169579 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 339 | Unpat Lode | NV101765072 | 9/1/2018 | 169580 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 340 | Unpat Lode | NV101765073 | 9/1/2018 | 169581 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 341 | Unpat Lode | NV101765074 | 9/1/2018 | 169582 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 342 | Unpat Lode | NV101765075 | 9/1/2018 | 169583 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 343 | Unpat Lode | NV101765076 | 9/1/2018 | 169584 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 344 | Unpat Lode | NV101765077 | 9/1/2018 | 169585 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 345 | Unpat Lode | NV101765078 | 9/1/2018 | 169586 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 346 | Unpat Lode | NV101765079 | 9/1/2018 | 169587 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 347 | Unpat Lode | NV101765080 | 9/1/2018 | 169588 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 348 | Unpat Lode | NV101765081 | 9/1/2018 | 169589 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 349 | Unpat Lode | NV101765082 | 9/1/2018 | 169590 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 350 | Unpat Lode | NV101765083 | 9/1/2018 | 169591 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 351 | Unpat Lode | NV101765084 | 9/1/2018 | 169592 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 352 | Unpat Lode | NV101765085 | 9/1/2018 | 169593 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 353 | Unpat Lode | NV101765086 | 9/1/2018 | 169594 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 354 | Unpat Lode | NV101765201 | 9/1/2018 | 169595 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 355 | Unpat Lode | NV101765202 | 9/1/2018 | 169596 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 356 | Unpat Lode | NV101765203 | 9/1/2018 | 169597 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 357 | Unpat Lode | NV101765204 | 9/1/2018 | 169598 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 358 | Unpat Lode | NV101762759 | 9/1/2018 | 169599 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 359 | Unpat Lode | NV101762760 | 9/1/2018 | 169600 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 360 | Unpat Lode | NV101762761 | 9/1/2018 | 169601 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 361 | Unpat Lode | NV101762762 | 9/1/2018 | 169602 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 362 | Unpat Lode | NV101762763 | 9/1/2018 | 169603 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 363 | Unpat Lode | NV101762764 | 9/1/2018 | 169604 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
GM 364 | Unpat Lode | NV101762765 | 9/1/2018 | 169605 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
MN 19 | Unpat Lode | NV101615129 | 12/11/2019 | 172318 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 20 | Unpat Lode | NV101615130 | 12/11/2019 | 172319 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 21 | Unpat Lode | NV101615131 | 12/11/2019 | 172320 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 22 | Unpat Lode | NV101615876 | 12/11/2019 | 172321 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 23 | Unpat Lode | NV101615877 | 12/11/2019 | 172322 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 24 | Unpat Lode | NV101615878 | 12/11/2019 | 172323 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 25 | Unpat Lode | NV101615879 | 12/11/2019 | 172324 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 26 | Unpat Lode | NV101615880 | 12/11/2019 | 172325 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 27 | Unpat Lode | NV101615881 | 12/11/2019 | 172326 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 28 | Unpat Lode | NV101615882 | 12/11/2019 | 172327 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 29 | Unpat Lode | NV101615883 | 12/11/2019 | 172328 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 30 | Unpat Lode | NV101615884 | 12/11/2019 | 172329 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 31 | Unpat Lode | NV101615885 | 12/11/2019 | 172330 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 32 | Unpat Lode | NV101615886 | 12/11/2019 | 172331 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 33 | Unpat Lode | NV101615887 | 12/11/2019 | 172332 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 34 | Unpat Lode | NV101615888 | 12/11/2019 | 172333 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 35 | Unpat Lode | NV101615889 | 12/11/2019 | 172334 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 36 | Unpat Lode | NV101615890 | 12/11/2019 | 172335 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 37 | Unpat Lode | NV101615891 | 12/11/2019 | 172336 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 38 | Unpat Lode | NV101615892 | 12/11/2019 | 172337 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 39 | Unpat Lode | NV101615893 | 12/11/2019 | 172338 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 40 | Unpat Lode | NV101615894 | 12/11/2019 | 172339 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 41 | Unpat Lode | NV101615895 | 12/11/2019 | 172340 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 42 | Unpat Lode | NV101615896 | 12/11/2019 | 172341 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 43 | Unpat Lode | NV101616505 | 12/11/2019 | 172342 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 44 | Unpat Lode | NV101616506 | 12/11/2019 | 172343 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 45 | Unpat Lode | NV101616507 | 12/11/2019 | 172344 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 46 | Unpat Lode | NV101616601 | 12/11/2019 | 172345 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 47 | Unpat Lode | NV101616602 | 12/11/2019 | 172346 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 48 | Unpat Lode | NV101616603 | 12/11/2019 | 172347 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 49 | Unpat Lode | NV101616604 | 12/12/2019 | 172348 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 50 | Unpat Lode | NV101616605 | 12/12/2019 | 172349 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 51 | Unpat Lode | NV101616606 | 12/12/2019 | 172350 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 52 | Unpat Lode | NV101616607 | 12/12/2019 | 172351 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 53 | Unpat Lode | NV101616608 | 12/12/2019 | 172352 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
28
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
MN 54 | Unpat Lode | NV101616609 | 12/12/2019 | 172353 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 55 | Unpat Lode | NV101616610 | 12/12/2019 | 172354 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 56 | Unpat Lode | NV101616611 | 12/12/2019 | 172355 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 57 | Unpat Lode | NV101616612 | 12/13/2019 | 172356 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 58 | Unpat Lode | NV101616613 | 12/13/2019 | 172357 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 59 | Unpat Lode | NV101616614 | 12/13/2019 | 172358 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 60 | Unpat Lode | NV101616615 | 12/13/2019 | 172359 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
MN 61 | Unpat Lode | NV101616616 | 12/13/2019 | 172360 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 12-2019 |
GMN-1 | Unpat Lode | NV102154419 | 10/7/2020 | 174617 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-2 | Unpat Lode | NV102154420 | 10/7/2020 | 174618 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-3 | Unpat Lode | NV102154421 | 10/7/2020 | 174619 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-4 | Unpat Lode | NV102154422 | 10/7/2020 | 174620 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-5 | Unpat Lode | NV102154423 | 10/7/2020 | 174621 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-6 | Unpat Lode | NV102154424 | 10/7/2020 | 174622 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-7 | Unpat Lode | NV102154425 | 10/7/2020 | 174623 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-8 | Unpat Lode | NV102154426 | 10/7/2020 | 174624 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-9 | Unpat Lode | NV102154427 | 10/7/2020 | 174625 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-10 | Unpat Lode | NV102154428 | 10/7/2020 | 174626 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-11 | Unpat Lode | NV102154429 | 10/7/2020 | 174627 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-12 | Unpat Lode | NV102154643 | 10/7/2020 | 174628 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-13 | Unpat Lode | NV102154644 | 10/7/2020 | 174629 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-14 | Unpat Lode | NV102154645 | 10/7/2020 | 174630 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-15 | Unpat Lode | NV102154646 | 10/7/2020 | 174631 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-16 | Unpat Lode | NV102154647 | 10/7/2020 | 174632 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-17 | Unpat Lode | NV102154648 | 10/10/2020 | 174633 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-18 | Unpat Lode | NV102154649 | 10/10/2020 | 174634 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-19 | Unpat Lode | NV102154650 | 10/7/2020 | 174635 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-20 | Unpat Lode | NV102154651 | 10/7/2020 | 174636 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-21 | Unpat Lode | NV102154652 | 10/7/2020 | 174637 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-22 | Unpat Lode | NV102154653 | 10/7/2020 | 174638 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-23 | Unpat Lode | NV102154654 | 10/7/2020 | 174639 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-24 | Unpat Lode | NV102154655 | 10/7/2020 | 174640 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-25 | Unpat Lode | NV102154656 | 10/7/2020 | 174641 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-26 | Unpat Lode | NV102154657 | 10/7/2020 | 174642 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-27 | Unpat Lode | NV102154658 | 10/7/2020 | 174643 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-28 | Unpat Lode | NV102154659 | 10/7/2020 | 174644 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-29 | Unpat Lode | NV102154660 | 10/7/2020 | 174645 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-30 | Unpat Lode | NV102154661 | 10/7/2020 | 174646 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-31 | Unpat Lode | NV102154662 | 10/7/2020 | 174647 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-32 | Unpat Lode | NV102154663 | 10/7/2020 | 174648 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-33 | Unpat Lode | NV102154664 | 10/10/2020 | 174649 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-34 | Unpat Lode | NV102154665 | 10/10/2020 | 174650 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-35 | Unpat Lode | NV102154666 | 10/8/2020 | 174651 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-36 | Unpat Lode | NV102154667 | 10/8/2020 | 174652 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-37 | Unpat Lode | NV102154668 | 10/8/2020 | 174653 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-38 | Unpat Lode | NV102154669 | 10/8/2020 | 174654 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-39 | Unpat Lode | NV102154822 | 10/8/2020 | 174655 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-40 | Unpat Lode | NV102154823 | 10/8/2020 | 174656 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-41 | Unpat Lode | NV102154824 | 10/8/2020 | 174657 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-42 | Unpat Lode | NV102154825 | 10/8/2020 | 174658 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-43 | Unpat Lode | NV102154826 | 10/8/2020 | 174659 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-44 | Unpat Lode | NV102154827 | 10/8/2020 | 174660 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-45 | Unpat Lode | NV102154828 | 10/8/2020 | 174661 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-46 | Unpat Lode | NV102154829 | 10/8/2020 | 174662 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-47 | Unpat Lode | NV102154830 | 10/8/2020 | 174663 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-48 | Unpat Lode | NV102154831 | 10/8/2020 | 174664 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-49 | Unpat Lode | NV102154832 | 10/8/2020 | 174665 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-50 | Unpat Lode | NV102154833 | 10/8/2020 | 174666 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-51 | Unpat Lode | NV102154834 | 10/8/2020 | 174667 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-52 | Unpat Lode | NV102154835 | 10/8/2020 | 174668 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-53 | Unpat Lode | NV102154836 | 10/8/2020 | 174669 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMN-54 | Unpat Lode | NV102154837 | 10/8/2020 | 174670 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-1 | Unpat Lode | NV102154838 | 10/5/2020 | 174671 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-2 | Unpat Lode | NV102154839 | 10/5/2020 | 174672 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-3 | Unpat Lode | NV102154840 | 10/5/2020 | 174673 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-4 | Unpat Lode | NV102154841 | 10/5/2020 | 174674 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-5 | Unpat Lode | NV102154842 | 10/5/2020 | 174675 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-6 | Unpat Lode | NV102154843 | 10/5/2020 | 174676 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-7 | Unpat Lode | NV102154844 | 10/5/2020 | 174677 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-8 | Unpat Lode | NV102154845 | 10/5/2020 | 174678 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-9 | Unpat Lode | NV102154846 | 10/5/2020 | 174679 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
29
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GMW-10 | Unpat Lode | NV102154847 | 10/5/2020 | 174680 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-11 | Unpat Lode | NV102154848 | 10/5/2020 | 174681 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-12 | Unpat Lode | NV102154849 | 10/5/2020 | 174682 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-13 | Unpat Lode | NV102154850 | 10/5/2020 | 174683 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-14 | Unpat Lode | NV102154851 | 10/5/2020 | 174684 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-15 | Unpat Lode | NV102155022 | 10/5/2020 | 174685 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-16 | Unpat Lode | NV102155023 | 10/5/2020 | 174686 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-17 | Unpat Lode | NV102155024 | 10/5/2020 | 174687 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-18 | Unpat Lode | NV102155025 | 10/5/2020 | 174688 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-19 | Unpat Lode | NV102155026 | 10/5/2020 | 174689 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-20 | Unpat Lode | NV102155027 | 10/5/2020 | 174690 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-21 | Unpat Lode | NV102155028 | 10/5/2020 | 174691 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-22 | Unpat Lode | NV102155029 | 10/5/2020 | 174692 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-23 | Unpat Lode | NV102155030 | 10/5/2020 | 174693 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-24 | Unpat Lode | NV102155031 | 10/5/2020 | 174694 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-25 | Unpat Lode | NV102155032 | 10/5/2020 | 174695 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-26 | Unpat Lode | NV102155033 | 10/5/2020 | 174696 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-27 | Unpat Lode | NV102155034 | 10/5/2020 | 174697 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-28 | Unpat Lode | NV102155035 | 10/5/2020 | 174698 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-29 | Unpat Lode | NV102155036 | 10/6/2020 | 174699 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-30 | Unpat Lode | NV102155037 | 10/6/2020 | 174700 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GMW-31 | Unpat Lode | NV102155038 | 10/6/2020 | 174701 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
MN-62 | Unpat Lode | NV102155039 | 10/19/2020 | 174702 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
MN-63 | Unpat Lode | NV102155040 | 10/19/2020 | 174703 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
MN-64 | Unpat Lode | NV102155041 | 10/19/2020 | 174704 | | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 10-2020 |
GME 1 | Unpat Lode | NV105244488 | 5/18/2021 | 177638 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 2 | Unpat Lode | NV105244489 | 5/18/2021 | 177639 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 3 | Unpat Lode | NV105244490 | 5/18/2021 | 177640 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 4 | Unpat Lode | NV105244491 | 5/18/2021 | 177641 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 5 | Unpat Lode | NV105244492 | 5/18/2021 | 177642 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 6 | Unpat Lode | NV105244493 | 5/18/2021 | 177643 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 7 | Unpat Lode | NV105244494 | 5/18/2021 | 177644 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 8 | Unpat Lode | NV105244495 | 5/18/2021 | 177645 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 9 | Unpat Lode | NV105244496 | 5/18/2021 | 177646 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 10 | Unpat Lode | NV105244497 | 5/18/2021 | 177647 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 11 | Unpat Lode | NV105245082 | 6/14/2021 | 177729 | 957564 | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 6-2021 |
GME 12 | Unpat Lode | NV105245083 | 6/14/2021 | 177730 | 957565 | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 6-2021 |
GME 13 | Unpat Lode | NV105244498 | 5/18/2021 | 177648 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 14 | Unpat Lode | NV105245084 | 6/14/2021 | 177731 | 957566 | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 6-2021 |
GME 15 | Unpat Lode | NV105244499 | 5/18/2021 | 177649 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 16 | Unpat Lode | NV105244500 | 5/18/2021 | 177650 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 17 | Unpat Lode | NV105244501 | 5/18/2021 | 177651 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 18 | Unpat Lode | NV105244502 | 5/18/2021 | 177652 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 19 | Unpat Lode | NV105244503 | 5/18/2021 | 177653 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 20 | Unpat Lode | NV105244504 | 5/18/2021 | 177654 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 21 | Unpat Lode | NV105244505 | 5/18/2021 | 177655 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 22 | Unpat Lode | NV105244506 | 5/18/2021 | 177656 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 23 | Unpat Lode | NV105244507 | 5/18/2021 | 177657 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 24 | Unpat Lode | NV105244508 | 5/18/2021 | 177658 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 25 | Unpat Lode | NV105244509 | 5/18/2021 | 177659 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 26 | Unpat Lode | NV105244510 | 5/18/2021 | 177660 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 27 | Unpat Lode | NV105244511 | 5/17/2021 | 177661 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 28 | Unpat Lode | NV105244512 | 5/17/2021 | 177662 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 29 | Unpat Lode | NV105244513 | 5/17/2021 | 177663 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 30 | Unpat Lode | NV105244514 | 5/17/2021 | 177664 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 31 | Unpat Lode | NV105244515 | 5/17/2021 | 177665 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 32 | Unpat Lode | NV105244516 | 5/17/2021 | 177666 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 33 | Unpat Lode | NV105244517 | 5/17/2021 | 177667 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 34 | Unpat Lode | NV105244518 | 5/17/2021 | 177668 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 35 | Unpat Lode | NV105244519 | 5/17/2021 | 177669 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 36 | Unpat Lode | NV105244520 | 5/17/2021 | 177670 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 37 | Unpat Lode | NV105244521 | 5/17/2021 | 177671 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 38 | Unpat Lode | NV105244522 | 5/17/2021 | 177672 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 39 | Unpat Lode | NV105244523 | 5/17/2021 | 177673 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 40 | Unpat Lode | NV105244524 | 5/17/2021 | 177674 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 41 | Unpat Lode | NV105244525 | 5/17/2021 | 177675 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 42 | Unpat Lode | NV105244526 | 5/17/2021 | 177676 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 43 | Unpat Lode | NV105244527 | 5/17/2021 | 177677 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 44 | Unpat Lode | NV105244528 | 5/17/2021 | 177678 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 45 | Unpat Lode | NV105244529 | 5/17/2021 | 177679 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 46 | Unpat Lode | NV105244530 | 5/17/2021 | 177680 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
30
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GME 47 | Unpat Lode | NV105244531 | 5/17/2021 | 177681 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 48 | Unpat Lode | NV105244532 | 5/17/2021 | 177682 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 49 | Unpat Lode | NV105244533 | 5/17/2021 | 177683 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 50 | Unpat Lode | NV105244534 | 5/17/2021 | 177684 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 51 | Unpat Lode | NV105244535 | 5/17/2021 | 177685 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 52 | Unpat Lode | NV105244536 | 5/17/2021 | 177686 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 53 | Unpat Lode | NV105244537 | 5/17/2021 | 177687 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 54 | Unpat Lode | NV105244538 | 5/17/2021 | 177688 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 55 | Unpat Lode | NV105244539 | 5/18/2021 | 177689 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 56 | Unpat Lode | NV105244540 | 5/18/2021 | 177690 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 57 | Unpat Lode | NV105244541 | 5/18/2021 | 177691 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 58 | Unpat Lode | NV105244542 | 5/18/2021 | 177692 | - | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 5-2021 |
GME 59 | Unpat Lode | NV105245085 | 6/14/2021 | 177732 | 957567 | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 6-2021 |
GME 60 | Unpat Lode | NV105245086 | 6/14/2021 | 177733 | 957568 | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | GRC Staked 6-2021 |
Table 3.2 List of Patented Mineral Claims for the Golden Mile Property
Claim | Property | Owner | Status | Acquisition History |
Long Shot, Cypress, Scorpion, Copper King - APN 009-020-02 | Golden Mile | GRC Nevada Inc. | 100% Owned | Acq From NMPII 6/2020 |
Copper Queen APN 009-020-04. | Golden Mile | GRC Nevada Inc. | Leased - Vize/Crum | Lease Assigned from NMPII 6/2020 |
3.3 | Royalties, Agreements and Encumbrances |
GRCN acquired 100% interest in the Golden Mile property from two separate business entities in June 2020. Total consideration was $650,000, consisting of $550,000 cash and $100,000 worth of stock issuance. The sellers retained a net smelter return royalty (NSR) of 3% on future production from the property claims. GRCN has the right to buy down 1% of the NSR on the claims for $1,500,000. A separate, single patented claim (Copper Queen) is held under lease by GRCN. This lease has annual advance royalty payments of $10,000 and a 3% NSR payable to Georgia L. Vize as Trustee of the Georgia L. Vize Family Trust dated June 5, 2001 and John Crum, an individual.
The 599 GRCN unpatented mining claims are on U.S. Federal lands administered by the BLM. The unpatented claims in the Golden Mile property are current and in good standing. Maintenance fees totaling $98,835 were paid to the BLM prior to August 31, 2021. Affidavits of Assessment documents were also recorded with Mineral County ($7,200) and Nye County ($72), both in Nevada, with a filing fee of $12.00 paid per claim located in each county.
Real property taxes on the purchased patented mining claims, Long Shot, Cypress, Scorpion, Copper King (APN 009-020-02), was $73.20 for 2021 -2022 and have been paid to Mineral County.
Real property taxes for the Copper Queen lease (APN 009-020-04) are paid by the Lessor.
3.4 | Environmental Liabilities and Permitting |
3.4.1 Environmental Liabilities
31
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Most of the past mineral exploration activities on BLM administered ground at the Golden Mile property have been reclaimed by previous operators. GRCN is not currently liable for reclamation of any remaining associated disturbances from past activities.
GRCN commenced mineral exploration activities at the Golden Mile property and is currently liable for reclamation of the associated disturbances. Liabilities associated with the exploration activities shall be incorporated into the Plan of Operations and approved by both the BLM and the State of Nevada.
3.4.2 Required Permits and Status
The location and current land ownership position (i.e., public land ownership) of the Golden Mile property means that it will be held to permitting requirements that are determined to be necessary by Mineral County, the State of Nevada, and the U.S. Department of the Interior BLM, Stillwater District Office, Stillwater Field Office.
In August 2020, GRCN initiated an environmental scoping exercise in preparation for submitting a Plan of Operations (POO) in support of an Environmental Assessment (EA) with the Stillwater Field Office of the BLM.
GRCN is engaged in evaluating the property area for environmental resources. The evaluation was based upon information derived from the following sources:
● | US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), |
● | US Geological Survey (USGS), |
● | Nevada BLM, |
● | Nevada State GIS database, and |
● | US Department of Agriculture (USDA). |
Using the same template used by the Nevada BLM offices, GRCN put together an Interdisciplinary Team Checklist (IDT Checklist). This checklist follows the guidelines set in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the evaluation of environmental resources for potential impacts. The determination for potential impact were as follows:
NP = not present in the area impacted by the proposed or alternative actions
NI = present, but not affected to a degree that detailed analysis is required
PI = present with potential for relevant impact that need to be analyzed in detail in the EA
Based upon the results of the initial scoping, GRCN determined which environmental resources needed to be evaluated, and to what level of detail that evaluation should take place.
The checklist for survey deliverables will address the following environmental resources:
● | Floodplains |
32
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
● | Surface Water Resources |
● | Recreation |
● | Cultural Resources (will meet partial requirements) |
● | Rangeland Health Standards |
● | Vegetation |
● | Woodland/Forestry |
● | Fuels/Fire Management |
● | Lands/Access |
Also derived from the flight deliverables will include:
● | Raw flight data (georeferenced) |
● | 2-ft contour map (.dxf format) |
● | ‘Bare Earth’ map |
● | Survey data for known and located Section corners |
Permitting activities completed as of the effective date of this report include:
● | Panels were set out and the area flown. Panels were set along roads every 914 m (3,000 ft) within the property area in order to create a quality control database for the point cloud data, |
● | Processing the point cloud information in Pix4D mapping software, |
● | Generation of a 2-ft contour map, |
● | Quality control checks by RWC’s Nevada licensed Professional Land Surveyor, |
● | Aerial imagery checked for quality control, and |
● | Completion of aerial imagery maps for Floodplains, Soils, Surface Water, Recreation and Vegetation. |
Water resources are also prioritized as a high-level necessity. As such, GRCN performed a desktop review using the Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR) online database. Within the Golden Mile property area, there has been very little points of diversion identified, and those found are largely for stock water usage, and thus are of very low yield and of no particular interest to GRCN. There are no points of diversion within a one-mile radius of the Golden Mile Private land holdings. The property resides within four distinct Hydrographic basins (Fig. 3.3):
● | Gabbs Valley |
● | Ione Valley |
● | Monte Cristo Valley |
● | Big Smokey Valley |
According to the NDWR online website, the Ione Valley basin was also found to be open for allocation with the perennial yield, according to the Hydrographic Area Summary, is 2,500 acre-feet per year, while the current allocation is only 189 acre-feet per year. According to the Office of the State Engineer of the State of Nevada, Interim Order #1308, GRCN may rightfully apply for water rights within the Ione Valley
33
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Hydrographic Basin. The Ione Basin is shown on Figure 3.3 and encompasses most of the Golden Mile property area including the main resource area. An application for allocation of water rights within the Ione Valley Hydrographic Basin was completed by the effective date of this report.
Figure 3.3 Hydrographic Basins in the Golden Mile Property area. Golden Mile Patented Claims in center of map (shown in blue outline), straddling the Ione Valley and Big Smokey Valley Hydrographic Basins.
3.5 | Other Significant Factors and Risks |
Considerable effort has been expended on conducting surface inventories within the Golden Mile property site. For the most part, these surveys have focused on surface features and artifacts. No finds of significance have been identified to-date. Given the number of cultural and archeological resources in the region, it is possible for subsurface discoveries to be made during construction of future mine facilities. Such a discovery would require mitigation that could impact development of a mine.
34
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
4 | ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY |
4.1 | Topography, Elevation and Vegetation |
The Golden Mile property is within the Basin and Range province, a major physiographic region of the western United States. The region is typified by north-northeast trending mountain ranges separated by broad, flat alluvium filled valleys. Locally, the mountain ranges trend northwesterly, making this area rather anomalous in relation to typical Nevada physiography. Much of the northern portion of the property is alluvial covered with volcanic rock outcrops.
The Golden Mile property lies on the northeastern slope and foothills of the Cedar Mountains. Elevations on the property site range from a minimum of 2,011 m (6,600 ft) in the valley to a maximum of 2,463 m (8,080 ft) at the uppermost elevation. The approximate elevation of the area known as the “Main Zone” on the Golden Mile patented claims is 2,134 m (7,000 ft).
Sagebrush, grasses, and scattered juniper are the dominant vegetation in the area which supports sparse deer and jackrabbit populations. No permitting problematic flora or fauna, such as Greater Sage-Grouse and Desert Tortoise, have been discovered on the property to-date.
4.2 | Accessibility and Transportation to the Property |
The Golden Mile property is accessible, in part, by highway and maintained county dirt and gravel roads (Fig. 4.1). The property can be reached from Hawthorne via Highway 95 east to Luning, then northeast on Nevada Highway 361, then south on gravel Nevada State Road 89 about 39 km (24 mi) to an unimproved dirt road which leads westward to the property. Alternatively, from Tonopah, travel 5 km (3 mi) west on U.S. Highway 95 to gravel Road 89, then northwest to about 69 km (43 mi) to the unimproved road leading west to the property. Regional roads are shown on the USGS lone Valley 1:100,000 topographic map. The immediate property area is shown on the USGS Simon 1:24,000 topographic map.
Both Hawthorne and Tonopah offer motel accommodations, restaurants, grocery stores and other services as well as fuel and other supplies. They are each the county seat for the respective counties of Mineral and Nye.
35
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 4.1 Golden Mile Property Access (Location of the Main Zone Deposit is shown as a yellow star).
4.3 | Climate |
The climate for the Golden Mile property is dry, semi-arid, with annual precipitation of approximately 11.4 cm (4.5 in), as documented at the nearby Mina Meteorological Station. Average temperatures range from a low of -6.7° C (20° F) to an average high temperature of 38° C (100° F) during July. Light snow may cover the area from January to April in an average year. Generally, field operations can be conducted year-round.
4.4 | Sufficiency of Surface Rights |
Mineral Resources in this report are located on patented claims controlled by GRCN. As described elsewhere in this report, GRCN has secured and maintained the necessary permits for exploration of the Golden Mile property.
36
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
4.5 | Infrastructure Availability and Sources |
4.5.1 Power
The closest power lines are located 8 km (5 mi) to the east in lone Valley. Future power needs for a proposed project at Golden Mile would likely require diesel powered generation.
4.5.2 Water
Perennial streams are not present in the Golden Mile property area. Water is currently available from springs and shallow surface wells located to east and to the west of the Main Zone deposit area. Drilling activities and hydrogeologic studies have identified potential groundwater sources for any future mine production and processing requirements.
37
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
5 | HISTORY |
The Golden Mile property has a long history which includes limited mining development, as well as a considerable amount of recent exploration activity including mapping, surface and underground sampling, geophysical surveys and drilling. This exploration activity was completed by several companies and has defined a significant area of gold mineralization associated with skarn development and gold stockwork mineralization along intrusive contact zones with surrounding sediments.
5.1 | Prior Ownership and Ownership Changes |
The most recent documented ownership of the Golden Mile property begins in 1973 with Colorado Energy Corporation. Exploratory work at that time included initial geological mapping, rock sampling and small magnetic survey on the J claims in what is now the Golden Mile property area. Late in 1974, the property was farmed out to Standard Slag Company (Standard Slag). Standard Slag relinquished their option in November 1975. No work is reported on the property between 1975 and 1981.
During 1982 to 1988, a consortium of companies including Elmwood Resources Ltd., Blythwood Consolidated Resources Ltd., Silver Acorn Developments Ltd. and Luxor Explorations Inc. (referred to as Elmwood JV) leased the Golden Mile property from Colorado Energy Corporation. In 1988 - 1989, Battle Mountain Exploration Company (Battle Mountain) optioned the Golden Mile property from the Elmwood Resources et al. consortium. Battle Mountain dropped their option on the property in 1989 and the unpatented claims were allowed to lapse.
In 1991, Nevada Mine Properties (NMP) acquired the property by staking and eventually signing an agreement with the private patented claim holders. This included forming a partnership on the four patented claims thereby eliminating former onerous advance royalty payments and NSR terms.
US Minerals Exploration Company (USMX) leased the property from NMP in 1993. The property was turned back after one year and NMP dropped the lease on the patented claim portion of the property.
During 1994-1996, Hemlo Gold Mines Inc. (Hemlo), after merging with Battle Mountain, leased part of the property. Hemlo did no drilling, instead, performed data compilation, re-logging and re-assaying of RC chips and undertook limited thin section petrography. Free gold was identified within chlorite rich skarn, and an exploration model was constructed identifying retrograde skarn alteration. However, the property was dropped when Hemlo was unable to acquire key patented claims and decided against exploring only the unpatented claims only. In 1997, Prism Resources Inc. (Prism) leased the property from NMP. In 1998, Teck Resources Inc. (Teck) entered into an option to joint venture with Prism. Following the 1999 program, Teck relinquished its option in 2000 and Prism subsequently terminated its lease.
In 2002, Cordex, then Cordilleran Exploration, performed surface rock sampling on the property. Late in 2003, Purple Vein Resources Ltd. leased the Golden Mile property including the five patented claims from NMP. Three additional unpatented claims staked for NMP were added to the property in 2004. In
38
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
December 2004, the corporate name Purple Vein Resources Ltd. was changed to Columbus Gold Corporation (Columbus). Cordex, funded by Columbus, explored the property from 2004 to 2006. The patented claims were also reacquired through a lease with the various parties.
In 2006, Cordex determined that lease payments on the patented property were too expensive to continue exploration of the Golden Mile property. Cordex (Columbus) subleased the property to Portage Minerals Inc. (Portage) in 2007. Portage compiled and reviewed property data, evaluated drill hole data and relogged drill holes and prepared cross-sections with the purpose of planning further exploration. Portage also completed a NI43-101 report in preparation for going public. Portage subsequently farmed their interest in the property to Roscan in 2010. Roscan terminated its interest in the property in 2011. The unpatented claims were subsequently conveyed by Columbus to a new company, Nevada Mine Properties II Inc. (NMPII), and patented claims reverting back to underlying owners.
In 2015, NMPII signed an operating agreement (called “Cedar Mountain LLC”) with the owners of the Long Shot, Cypress, Scorpion, Copper King patented claims and a mining lease with the owners of the Copper Queen patented claim. These agreements successfully consolidated unpatented and patented claim interests on the Golden Mile property.
In November 2016, Kinross entered into a Mining Lease and Assignment covering the patented and unpatented mining claims held by Cedar Mountain LLC. No details for these transactions are available in the public record. In October 2019, Kinross terminated all interest lease agreements covering patented and unpatented claims at Golden Mile. Upon termination of the lease agreements, Kinross conveyed 363 unpatented mining claims to NMPII.
5.2 | Historical Exploration and Development |
A total of 20,158.2 m (66,131 ft) of air rotary or reverse circulation (RC) drilling and core has been performed at the Golden Mile property prior to acquisition by GRCN. This included work by Standard Slag, the Elmwood JV, Battle Mountain, USMX, Teck, Cordex, Roscan and Kinross (Table 5.1). All of these holes were located within the boundaries of the present-day Golden Mile property (Fig. 5.1). The vast majority of the drilling, however, has been directed towards the Main Zone located on the patented mineral claims.
The following is available for examination:
● | Skeleton core from a 5‐hole diamond drilling program conducted by Roscan in 2011, and |
● | Chip trays containing RC drill cuttings completed by Battle Mountain Gold Corporation (1988‐89), Cordex (2006-2007) and Kinross (2017-2019). |
39
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
TABLE 5.1 Summary of Historic Drilling Completed at the Golden Mile Property
Company | Year | No. of | Type | Total | Total | Results |
Standard Slag | 1975 | 7 | Air track | 268 | 81.7 | 2 holes strong gold |
Elmwood JV | 1982-1988 | 18 | Air track | 1,141 | 347.8 | 11 holes with high Au |
Battle Mtn | 1988-1989 | 29 | RC | 11,650 | 3,551.8 | 11 holes with high Au |
USMX | 1993 | 15 | RC | 4,880 | 1,487.8 | best intercept 0.124 opt |
Teck | 1999 | 5 | RC | 3,474 | 1,059.1 | Weak Au in 4 holes |
Cordex | 2006-2007 | 28 | RC | 14,170 | 4,319 | Weak-stringer Au in 22 holes |
Roscan | 2011 | 5 | Core | 3,146 | 958.9 | Visible Au |
Kinross | 2017-2019 | 36 | RC | 27,402 | 8,352.1 | Deep conceptual targets |
Total | | 143 | | 66,131 | 20,158.2 | |
Figure 5.1 Location Map of Historic Drill Holes Completed on the Golden Mile Property
40
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Significant results from historic drilling included up to 10.26 g/t Au (0.30 opst Au) over 36.6 m (120 ft) including 34.89 g/t Au (1.02 opst Au) over 9.1 m (30 ft) and 6.04 g/t Au (0.19 opst Au) over 16.7 m (55 ft) including 29.75 g/t Au (0.87 opst Au) over 3.0 m (10 ft) in Hole CMA89-7 (Battle Mountain) and 46.53 g/t Au (1.36 opst Au) over 6.1 m (20 ft) including 91.00 g/t Au (2.66 opst Au) over 3.1 m (10 ft) in Hole GMC002 (Roscan). Significant results of historic drilling programs are summarized in Table 5.2. A significant portion of the information gained from this drilling has been used for estimation of the initial resources reported herein.
Table 5.2 Summary of Significant Historic Drilling Intercepts*
*Historic HoleID prefixes were designated by the following operators: CMA (USMX), CMA88 & CMA89 (Battle Mountain Exploration), GM (Elmwood Joint Venture), GMC (Roscan) & MI (Cordex).
The following generally describes the exploration and development work undertaken by previous owners and/or operators.
5.2.1 Early Exploration Work
The earliest documented exploration work was in 1973 by Colorado Energy Corporation who conducted initial geological mapping rock sampling and small magnetic survey on the claims in what is now the
41
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Golden Mile area. In 1975, Standard Slag drilled seven air track drill holes totaling 81.7 m (268 ft) in the area of historic magnetite/copper workings in the Main Zone of the Golden Mile property (Fig. 5.2). The deepest hole penetrated to depth of 18.3 m (60 ft) but several holes were lost in the underground workings.
Figure 5.2 Photos looking north at Main Zone of the Golden Mile property (left) and closeup of magnetite-copper mineralization exposed in small, historic open pit (right)
Standard Slag reported interceptions including 9.59 g/t Au (0.28 opst Au) over 3.1 m (10 ft) in Drill Hole AT-2B, and 7.19 g/t Au (0.21 opst Au) over 7.6 m (25 ft) in Drill Hole AT-1A, an inclined hole which drilled along strike (Jaramillo, 1975). All the remaining holes reportedly cut poorly mineralized limestone. Standard Slag relinquished their option in November 1975 and no further work was reported on the property between 1975 and 1982.
From 1982 to 1988, a joint venture comprised of Elmwood Resources Ltd, Blythwood Consolidated Resources Ltd, Silver Acorn Developments Ltd and Luxor Explorations Inc (Elmwood JV) performed geological mapping, a limited ground magnetic survey, and drilled 18 shallow air track holes totaling 347.8 m (1,141 ft). Elevated gold values were reported in 11 of the 18 holes including 9.59 g/t Au (0.28 opst Au over 15.2 m (50 ft) in hole GM15 and 3.46 g/t Au (0.101 opst Au) over 14.0 m (46 ft) in hole GM13 (Pegg, 1988). All holes were drilled within the Main Zone and in similarly altered rock to the west of the Main Zone and mineralized intercepts were within 30 m (100 ft) of surface. Two cyanide bottle roll tests were also completed early in the program returning gold recoveries of 84% and 81% after a 24-hour period (Dix, 1982).
During 1988 and 1989, Battle Mountain Exploration Company (Battle Mountain) completed rock sampling, wide-spaced ground magnetic and VLF-EM surveys and drilled 29 RC drill holes totaling 3,551.8 m (11,650 ft). Fifteen of the holes were drilled vertically and the remainder were angled holes. Holes were primarily drilled in the Main Zone and along the intrusive contact to the northeast. Several vertical holes were also drilled through post-mineral volcanic cover to the north and northeast extending the known mineralized zone to the northeast for at least a 100 m (300 ft). Elevated gold values were reported in 13 of the drill
42
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
holes, including 28.96 m (95 ft) grading 19.86 g/t Au (0.580 opst Au) in drill hole 89-7, which included 46.92 g/t Au (1.37 opst Au) over 9.1 m (30 ft), and 8.90 g/t Au (0.26 opst Au) over 4.57 m (15 ft) in drill hole 88-2 (Gatchell, 1989).
In 1993, US Minerals Exploration Company (USMX) drilled 15 RC holes totaling 1,487.8 m (4,880 ft) mainly testing down-dip extensions of the mineralization intersected by Battle Mountain. The best intercept reported was 4.25 g/t Au (0.124 opst Au) over 13.7 m (45 ft) (Kern, 1998).
5.2.2 Teck
During 1998 and 1999, Teck Resources Inc. (Teck) completed a major exploration program including 4 km2 geological mapping and surface rock geochemical sampling (Hudson, 1998). Geophysical work was also conducted including 7.5 line-km of controlled-source, audio-frequency magneto-telluric (CSAMT), four linekm of dipole-dipole induced polarization (IP) and 38 line-km of ground magnetometer surveys.
Teck completed geological mapping over the entire property area at a scale of 1:6,000. Mesozoic rocks in the immediate mine area were mapped at 1:1,200, using an existing grid for control.
Teck also performed petrographic studies on four thin sections taken from cuttings from drill holes GMT-2 and GMT-3. Hudson (1999) described a variety of skarn assemblages from GMT-2, including garnet-diopside skarn with retrograde calcite-white mica in sandy or interbedded limestone, calcite-diopside-idocrase white mica skarn, and caicite-1, wollastonite skarn. From 1% to 5% fine-grained disseminated anhedral pyrite was also present in the chips. GMT-3 intercepted altered pyroxene diorite or gabbro (AnS0) with about 1% quartz. The diorite is weakly and variably altered to chlorite-epidote-calcite-clay assemblages. In some cases, the pyroxene has been replaced by actinolite. In other chips, pyroxene is replaced by calcite-epidote-chlorite. Bicchulite, (Ca2Al(SiAl)O7H2O) is tentatively identified as replacing plagioclase and pyroxene in some chips. The diorite hosts garnet diopside- calcite (+quartz) endoskarn with trace pyrrhotite. Quartz-calcite-filled fractures crosscut the garnet. Exoskarn chips in limestone are also present.
During 1998, Teck also collected 87 surface rock samples from the Golden Mile area, of which 67 were located within the boundaries of the present-day Golden Mile property. Of these 67 samples, gold results ranged from below detection (<5 ppb Au) to a maximum of 6,120 ppb Au (CDR-136.) Ten of these samples exceeded 500 ppb Au. Results for these highest ten samples are presented in Table 5.3.
43
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
TABLE 5.3 Teck Significant Surface Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au)
Sample | Au (ppb) | Ag (ppm} | As (ppm) | Bi (ppm) | Cu (ppm) | Sb | (ppm) | Zn (ppm) |
CDR 136 | 6,120 | 3.8 | 394 | 28 | 2,750 | 72 | 2,540 | |
CDR 132 | 5,460 | 7.8 | 5,350 | 62 | 4,100 | 84 | 132 | |
CDR 129 | 4,160 | 7.0 | 358 | 10 | 6,130 | 38 | 328 | |
CDR 133 | 1,850 | 9.8 | 8,110 | 530 | 2,670 | 72 | 48 | |
CDR 8 | 1,455 | 3.6 | 590 | 0 | 2,200 | 40 | 136 | |
CDR 135 | 1,260 | 4.8 | 2,690 | 394 | 3,050 | 2 | 26 | |
CDR 130 | 905 | 5.8 | 792 | 20 | 3,530 | 18 | 112 | |
CDR 6 | 730 | 3.0 | 296 | Inf | >10,000 | 12 | 298 | |
CDR 7 | 645 | 2.0 | 2,630 | Inf | >10,000 | 98 | 1,855 | |
CDR 18 | 535 | 1.4 | 1,650 | Inf | 19 | 72 | 136 |
In 1999, Teck drilled five RC holes totaling 1,059.1 m (3,474 ft) testing extensions and new targets on the Golden Mile property, outside the Main zone. These holes were angled to depths of 165 m (540 ft) to 262 m (860 ft) targeting geophysical anomalies within the unpatented claim block. Two holes (GMT-3 & GMT-5) failed to reach the desired target and remained in volcanic rock. The northeast extension of the breccia zone also remained untested. Several of their holes cut relatively thick zones of low-grade gold approximately 457 m (1,500 ft) north and east of the Main Zone. At least one hole penetrated over 122 m (400 ft) of magnetite rich sediments with associated anomalous gold. This hole tested a large magnetic anomaly located on the east side of the property. Teck, as was the case with Battle Mountain, could not renegotiate lease terms with the patented claim owners in a timely manner and therefore no Teck drilling was collared on patented claims.
The most significant results were returned from Hole GMT-2 designed to test a magnetic high on the ridge, east of the Main Zone. A previous drill hole by Battle Mountain had encountered massive magnetite in this area. Silicified breccia and a CSAMT resistivity anomaly are also present on this ridge. Teck reported encountering 122 m (400 ft) of magnetitegarnet-sericite-calcite skarn in GMT-2 (Kuzma, 1999). Short intervals of elevated gold values were intersected within the skarn including 0.79 g/ Au (0.023 opst Au) over 6.1 m (20 ft) starting 189m (620 ft) downhole, and 0.465 g/t Au (0.014 opst Au over 3.1 m (10 ft) starting 226 m (740 ft) downhole.
5.2.3 Cordex
in 2002, Cordex, then Cordilleran Exploration Company, performed surface rock sampling on the property. Late in 2003, Purple Vein Resources Ltd leased the Golden Mile property including the five patented claims. In December 2004, the corporate name Purple Vein Resources Ltd was changed to Columbus Gold Corporation (Columbus).
In 2006, Cordex commenced an exploration program on the Golden Mile property funded by Columbus. Cordex conducted surface geological mapping at a scale of 200 feet to the inch (1:2,400) and detailed the
44
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
distribution of rock types and outcrops and features related to mineralization, including structures, distribution of skarn alteration, and limonite. Cordex also mapped accessible underground workings at a scale of 20 feet to one inch (1:240). Geologic features were recorded, and representative underground rock-chip assay samples were collected across the back and along the walls of the workings. The geologic information collected, integrated with surface and subsurface data on distribution of gold mineralization, indicated that gold is located along northeast structural trend that lies along the contact of limestone with quartz diorite. Some northwest structures were also mapped and appeared to be related to the northeast-trending contact of the quartz diorite.
In 2002, Cordex collected 38 rock chip samples from within the current Golden Mile property boundaries. Five of the samples were RC cuttings from either the Teck or Battle Mountain drill holes. Results ranged up to 10,880 ppb Au. Four rock samples and four samples of cuttings returned gold values exceeding 500 ppb Au (Table 5.4).
TABLE 5.4 Cordex Significant Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au)
Sample | Au | Ag | As | Bi | Cu | Sb | Zn | Description |
3578 | 10,880 | 7.6 | 1,012 | 3870 | 2808 | 132 | 100 | o/c near adit, feox, mod sil |
3575 | 6,341 | 2.6 | 1,447 | 135 | 1094 | 18 | 21 | SLTw/Vcc gray, feox |
3588 | 5,411 | 5.9 | 123 | 14 | 3273 | 10 | 234 | sheared bleached SLT mt, feox, feox |
3571 | 2,728 | 0.6 | 29 | -1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | DH cuttings GMT-3 660-665 (1080 ppb) |
3570 | 1,856 | 0.5 | 104 | 5 | 52 | -2 | 10 | DH cuttings GMT-3 590-595 (1300 ppb) |
3582 | 1,301 | 0.6 | 150 | 11 | 44 | 2 | 12 | GMT-3 cuttings 590-595; gray QDR |
3583 | 1,233 | 0.7 | 25 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 11 | cuttings wk ox, tr veinqtz |
3568 | 713 | 2.7 | 413 | 19 | 1994 | 11 | 103 | dump, PY |
Columbus also funded Cordex to drill 28 RC holes totaling 4,319m (14,170 ft) in 2006. The principal objectives of the drill program were to establish lateral continuity of gold mineralization, determine the width and length of mineralized trends, and to achieve the understanding of the distribution and controls on gold mineralization. This program also tested down-dip and strike extensions of better grade mineralization identified from earlier drilling, primarily to the north and northeast under post-mineral volcanic cover. The most significant results were returned from Holes MI-06 and MI-12. Hole MI-06 intercepted 9.1 m (30 ft) averaging 3.54 g/t Au (0.103 opst Au) starting at 61.0 m (200 ft) down-hole and Hole MI-12 encountered 18.3 m (60 ft) averaging 7.14 g/t Au (0.208 g/t Au) starting at 51.8 m (170 ft) down-hole. Several holes intercepted >30 m (>100 ft) thick continuous zones of low-grade gold mineralization, approximately 0.3 g/t Au (0.01 opst Au).
45
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Significant results of the Cordex RC drilling program are summarized in Table 5.5.
TABLE 5.5 Significant Results from Cordex Drilling (from Suda, 2009)
Drill | Incl. | Total Depth | Total Depth | Intercept | Intercept | Interval | Interval | Au | Au |
Ml-01 | -50, N60W | 550 | 167.6 | 00-15 | 0.0-4.6 | 15 | 4.57 | 0.018 | 0.6 |
| | | | 29.0-36.6 | 25 | 7.62 | 0.038 | 1.291 | |
Ml-02 | -50, N55W | 450 | 137.2 | 00-85 | 0.0-25.9 | 85 | 25.91 | 0.036 | 1.222 |
| | includes | 00-50 | 0.0-15.2 | 50 | 15.24 | 0.058 | 2.002 | |
| | | 295-310 | 89.9-94.5 | 15 | 4.57 | 0.042 | 1.423 | |
Ml-03 | -50, N60W | 185 | 56.4 | 00-30 | 0.0-09.1 | 30 | 9.14 | 0.053 | 1.35 |
Ml-04 | -50, N60W | 495 | 150.9 | 125-130 | 38.8-39.6 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.018 | 0.622 |
Ml-05 | -50, N60W | 465 | 141.7 | No assays >500 ppb | | | | | |
Ml-06 | -50, N60W | 595 | 181.3 | 200-230 | 61.0-70.1 | 30 | 9.14 | 0.103 | 3.54 |
| | | 265-270 | 80.8-83.3 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.023 | 0.95 | |
| | | 390-395 | 118.9-120.4 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.025 | 0.866 | |
| | | 590-595 | 179.8-181.3 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.029 | 0.988 | |
Ml-07 | -50, N60W | 550 | 167.6 | 230-235 | 70.1-71.6 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.026 | 0.882 |
Ml-08 | -50, N60W | 505 | 153.9 | 05.0-10.0 | 1.5-3.0 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.119 | 4.105 |
| | | 150-155 | 45.7-47.2 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.027 | 0.942 | |
| | | 195-200 | 59.4-61.0 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.029 | 0.979 | |
Ml-09 | -90 | 545 | 166.1 | No assays >500 ppb | | | | | |
Ml-10 | -90 | 525 | 160 | 185-190 | 56.4-57.9 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.023 | 0.772 |
Ml-11 | -50, N60W | 495 | 150.9 | No assays >500 ppb | | | | | |
Ml-12 | -50, N60W | 395 | 120.4 | 130-135 | 39.6-41.1 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.017 | 0.571 |
| | | 170-230 | 51.8-70.1 | 60 | 18.29 | 0.208 | 7.139 | |
| | includes | 170-200 | 51.8-61.0 | 30 | 9.14 | 0.402 | 13.807 | |
| | | 365-370 | 111.2-112.8 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.025 | 0.851 | |
| | | 380-390 | 115.8-118.9 | 10 | 3.05 | 0.028 | 0.932 | |
Ml-13 | -50, N60W | 685 | 208.8 | 205-215 | 62.5-65.5 | 10 | 3.05 | 0.106 | 3.62 |
| | | 255-260 | 77.7-79.2 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.175 | 6 | |
| | | 275-280 | 83.8-91.9 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.018 | 0.608 | |
| | | 405-410 | 123.4-125.0 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.023 | 0.802 | |
| | | 600-605 | 182.9-184.4 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.067 | 1.518 | |
MI-14 | -50, N60W | 585 | 178.3 | 210-215 | 64.0-65.5 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.016 | 0.53 |
| | | 300-305 | 91.4-93.0 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.029 | 0.987 | |
| | | 410-420 | 125.0-128.0 | 10 | 305 | 0.022 | 0.754 | |
| | | 470-485 | 143.2-147.8 | 15 | 4.57 | 0.017 | 0.569 | |
| | | 525-535 | 160.0-163.1 | 10 | 3.05 | 0.031 | 1.059 | |
MI-15 | -90 | 665 | 202.7 | 415-420 | 126.5-128.0 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.046 | 1.559 |
Ml-16 | -50, N60W | 556 | 169.2 | 195-200 | 59.5-61.9 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.037 | 1.277 |
| | | 215-300 | 66.5-91.5 | 85 | 25.91 | 0.022 | 0.786 | |
| | | 215-275 | 65.5-83.4 | 60 | 18.29 | 0.017 | 0.569 | |
| | | 275-300 | 83.4-91.5 | 25 | 7.62 | 0.038 | 1.307 | |
| | | 435-440 | 132.6-134.1 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.017 | 0.567 | |
Ml-17 | -50. N62W | 495 | 150.9 | 415-425 455-470 | 126.5-129.6 138.7-143.3 | 10 15 | 3.05 4.57 | 0.015 0.019 | 0.542 0.774 |
Ml-18 | -50, N60W | 525 | 160 | 380-385 | 115.9-117.4 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.029 | 1.007 |
| | | 455-460 | 138.7-140.2 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.043 | 1.472 | |
| | | 495-500 | 150.9-152.4 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.015 | 0.52 | |
Ml-19 | -50, N60W | 503 | 153 | 210-215 | 64.0-65.5 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.022 | 0.75 |
| | | 280-290 | 85.4-88.4 | 10 | 3.05 | 0.022 | 0.769 | |
| | | 415-425 | 126.5-129.6 | 10 | 3.05 | 0.038 | 1.286 | |
| | | 440-445 | 134.1-135.7 | 5 | 1.52 | 0.096 | 3.28 | |
| | | 495-503 | 150.9-153.4 | 8 | 2.44 | 0.033 | 1.145 | |
Ml-20 | -50, N61W | 555 | 169.2 | No assays > 500 ppb | | | | | |
Ml-21 | -50, N60W | 500 | 152.4 | 75-90 | 22.9-27.4 | 15 | 4.57 | 0.037 | 1.273 |
46
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| | | | 85-90 135-145 230-255 465-480 | 25.9-27.4 41.2-44.2 70.1-77.7 141.8-146.3 | 5 10 25 15 | 1.52 3.05 7.62 4.57 | 0.065 0.017 0.015 0.024 | 2.214 0.568 0.502 0.829 |
Ml-22 | -50, N60W | 500 | 152.4 includes | 150-340 150-190 180-185 210-230 240-270 285-300 360-365 390-400 | 45.7-103.7 45.7-57.9 54.7-56.4 64.0-70.1 73.2-82.3 86.9-91.5 109.8-111.3 118.9-122.0 | 190 40 5 20 30 15 5 10 | 58 12.19 1.52 6.1 9.14 4.57 1.52 3.05 | 0.019 0.020 0.088 0.074 0.015 0.028 0.092 0.013 | 0.644 0.673 2.508 0.514 0.943 3.134 0.529 |
Ml-23 | -50, N60W | 495 | 150.9 | 255-260 335-355 335-340 | 77.7-79.3 102.1-108.2 102.1-103.7 | 5 20 5 | 1.52 6.1 1.52 | 0.089 0.027 0.073 | 3.032 0.913 2.492 |
Ml-24 | -50, N60W | 500 | 152.4 | No assays > 500 ppb | | | | | |
Ml-25 | -50, S25W | 500 | 152.4 includes | 380-395 385-390 | 115.9-120.4 117.3-118.9 | 15 5 | 4.57 1.52 | 0.025 0.053 | 0.859 1.805 |
MI-26 | -50, S26W | 500 | 152.4 | 220-225 315-320 | 67.1-68.6 96.0-97.6 | 5 5 | 1.52 1.52 | 0.031 0.04 | 1.067 1.384 |
Ml-27 | -50, S50W | 410 | 125 | No assays > 500 ppb | | | | | |
Ml-28 | -50. S45E | 445 | 135.7 | No assays > 500 ppb | | | | | |
5.2.4 Portage
Portage Minerals Inc (Portage) optioned the Golden Mile property from Columbus in late 2007. Portage completed a detailed data review and evaluated drill-hole data and cross sections with the purpose of planning further exploration. Portage also commissioned the preparation of a NI 43-101 Technical Report for the property (Suda, 2009). This report incorporated the findings of a proprietary report by Dr Richard Nielsen of Scott Wilson-Roscoe Postle Associates on behalf of Portage in 2008. GRCN has not obtained a copy of this proprietary report.
5.2.5 Roscan
In 2011, Roscan drilled five diamond core (HQ-size) holes totaling 958.9m (3,146 ft) on the Golden Mile property (Roscan, 2011). Four of the holes were drilled as twin holes to RC holes drilled by previous explorers (mainly Battle Mountain and Cordex) to compare assay results and to determine controls on gold mineralization. One hole was drilled to test a mapped north-northwest trending shear zone. The core holes drilled to twin previously drilled RC holes were located as close to each respective hole as practical. “Twins” may have been as far as 15m (50 ft) from the original hole mainly due to previous site reclamation and lack of adequate surveying of original collars. Both the RC holes and the core holes were sampled on 1.52m (5 ft) intervals.
All Roscan core holes cut ore-grade to significant gold mineralization (Table 5.6). Drill holes intercepted up to 6.1 m (20.0 ft) averaging 46.40 g/t Au (1.353 opst Au) in Drill Hole GMC002, which twinned a previous RC hole that intersected 9.1 m (30.0 ft) averaging 46.97 g/t Au (1.37 opst Au). High-grade gold mineralization was observed to be concentrated in iron oxide veinlet zones that represent weathered pyrite veinlet zones that trend north-northwest within calcareous sandstone and quartz diorite. Hole
47
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
GMC002 also intercepted 22.9m (75 ft) grading 0.74 g/t Au (0.022 opst Au) starting 86.7 m (285 ft) down-hole.
Generally, the core holes intersected narrower and, locally, lower-grade intercepts relative to the earlier rotary drilling. In some cases, grades exceeded the nearby RC holes. Based on the limited data on recovery and the condition of the core, it is reasonable to assume that some recovery problems with core were experienced within the mineralized zones.
TABLE 5.6 Significant Results from Roscan Drilling (from Roscan, 2011)
5.2.6 NMPII
In 2014, NMPII completed a reevaluation of past drilling activities including compilation of a digital database which identified numerous deficiencies in the drill data (NMPII, 2014). In particular, the assay data showed that mineralization was erratic. During the last four of five drill programs completed before 2014, duplicate assaying was done on higher grade samples. Gold values were found to have reasonable repeatability at lower grades. Higher grade intervals (>1 g/t Au), however, tended to vary as much as 200% when reassayed. NMPII reported that it was not uncommon to see values ranging from 15 g/t Au (0.438 opst) to over 50 g/t Au (1.46 opst) from the same sample. These samples included reassay of pulps, rejects and second samples collected during drilling. Free gold was noted drill cuttings and core by several past exploration groups and a pronounced nugget effect most likely accounts for the discrepancy in the high-grade samples.
48
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
5.2.7 Kinross
During the lease period 2016-2019, NMPII reported that Kinross provided no interpretive data and very few reports on their exploration activities. Kinross developed an initial exploration model and identified targets over time as they enlarged the claim block. Kinross concluded that their geologic model did not comport to their exploration findings. This included drill testing of a significant IP chargeability high/resistivity low, south of Golden Mile skarn.
In summary, from 2016 to 2019 Kinross performed the following exploration work on the Golden Mile property:
1. | Rock and Soil Sampling |
2. | Airborne VTEM geophysical survey (resistivity and magnetics) |
3. | Ground gravity survey |
4. | IP-Resistivity survey (one line) completed by Zonge Geoscience Inc. (Zonge) |
5. | Geologic mapping by John Norby and Gerry Ray |
6. | Petrographic studies |
7. | 36 RC drill holes totaling 8,352.1 m (27,402 ft); included drill testing of IP chargeability high/resistivity low, south of Golden Mile skarn. |
In general, RC drilling by Kinross returned only elevated gold values with the most significant results returned from drill hole GM19-15. This hole was drilled in the vicinity of the Golden Mile Main Zone and intersected 12.19 m (40.0 ft) averaging 0.47 g/t Au (0.01 opst Au) including 4.57 m (15 ft) averaging 0.79 g/t (0.02 opst Au).
Significant results of the Kinross RC drilling program are summarized in Table 5.7.
TABLE 5.7 Significant Results from Kinross Drilling 2017-2019
Target | DH ID |
| From | To | Interval | Au |
| m | m | m | g/t | ||
GM | GM17-01 |
| 28.96 | 30.48 | 1.52 | 0.266 |
BELL | BL18-06 |
| 227.08 | 234.70 | 7.62 | 0.375 |
inc. | 228.60 | 230.12 | 1.52 | 0.867 | ||
GM | GM19-02 |
| 38.10 | 41.15 | 3.05 | 0.271 |
GM19-09 |
| 71.63 | 73.15 | 1.52 | 1.020 | |
GM19-10 |
| 193.55 | 196.60 | 3.05 | 0.337 | |
GM19-15 |
| 6.10 | 10.67 | 4.57 | 0.413 | |
inc. | 6.10 | 7.62 | 1.52 | 0.837 | ||
| 24.38 | 27.43 | 3.05 | 0.288 | ||
inc. | 24.38 | 25.91 | 1.52 | 0.512 | ||
| 35.05 | 44.20 | 9.14 | 0.271 | ||
inc. | 35.05 | 38.10 | 3.05 | 0.489 | ||
| 41.15 | 44.20 | 3.05 | 0.263 | ||
| 59.44 | 71.63 | 12.19 | 0.470 | ||
inc. | 62.48 | 67.06 | 4.57 | 0.789 | ||
| 68.58 | 70.10 | 1.52 | 0.844 | ||
| 79.25 | 105.16 | 25.91 | 0.212 | ||
inc. | 83.82 | 85.34 | 1.52 | 0.502 | ||
| 97.54 | 99.06 | 1.52 | 0.455 |
49
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
In June 2016, Kinross contracted consulting geologist Gerry Ray to examine the geology, the various styles of alteration and the Au-bearing Cu-Fe skarn mineralization on the Golden Mile property (Ray, 2016). A total of 59 rock chip or grab samples were collected representing all types of hydrothermal and non-hydrothermal alteration. The samples were submitted to ALS USA Inc. (ALS) in Reno for whole rock and trace element analysis, including for gold and silver assay. Assays showed that all 7 samples taken from the Main Zone were anomalous in gold (minimum 266 ppb to a maximum of 2,390 ppb Au) and that most samples contain significant amounts of copper (maximum 9 % Cu). In addition, many Main Zone samples were anomalous in other elements including silver (up to 12.1 ppm Ag) together with As, Zn, Bi, Sb, Te, and Co. However, apart from the Main Zone, no Dunlap Formation rocks outcropping on surface within the Golden Mile Stock thermal aureole contain significant amounts of gold or base metal mineralization; this includes the more extensive areas of hornfels (Unit HF) and silicification (Unit S) as well as those with more limited and sporadic exoskarn alteration (Unit SK). Most of the Luning Formation samples were also barren, including beds cut by veins of Fe carbonate. One exception occurs in the southernmost elongate unit of impure limestone where there are several small workings including a vertical shaft. Assays of this hematite-goethite-rich material, as seen on the shaft dump contains up to 5.5% Cu with anomalous quantities of Zn, As, Bi, Sb, Se, Co and Ag (the latter up to 8.5 ppm Ag). However, gold values are very low with a maximum of 20 ppb Au. Most of the Golden Mile Stock, including parts with dense quartz-feldspar stockwork veins and rusty weathering zones are barren of base and precious metal mineralization. By contrast, the 5 endoskarn samples contain anomalous amounts of gold and other elements, particularly samples from the western portion of the stock.
Table 5.8 below compares the average values of the major elements in the endoskarn and non- endoskarn-altered Golden Mile Stock. The endoskarn has noticeably higher amounts of Fe, Ca, Mg and LoI, and considerably lower values of Si, Al, Na and K (Ray, 2016).
50
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
TABLE 5.8 Comparing average assay values for various parts of the Golden Mile Stock (Ray, 2016): (1) Stock with few or no veins: (2) Stock with abundant stockworks: (3) Endoskarn. Anomalous values in red
5.3 | Geophysics |
Various types of geophysical surveys have been carried out on the Golden Mile property since the 1980’s. The earliest documented surveys were carried out by Battle Mountain in 1988-1989 and Teck Resources in 1999. These surveys included a ground magnetic (GMAG) survey using a hand-held magnetometer, controlled source audio magneto-telluric (CSAMT) and induced polarization (IP).
In late 2016, Kinross contracted Zonge Geosciences (Zonge) to fly a Versatile Time Domain Electromagnetic (VTEM) survey over the Golden Mile property, which also included both electromagnetic and magnetic data. Gold related skarn mineralization was the main target type sought. Kinross also had Zonge complete a gravity survey in the spring of 2017 and an IP/Resistivity survey in the winter of 2018. The primary objective of these surveys was lithologic/structural definition and alteration delineation in support of the gold exploration program.
The location of geophysical surveys completed to-date are shown in Figure 5.3.
The reader is referred to reports by previous operators for descriptions of results and interpretation of historical geophysical studies at Golden Mile.
51
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 5.3 Location Map of Geophysical Surveys Completed on the Golden Mile Property
52
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
5.4 | Historical Production |
Gold and copper mineralization were first discovered in the Golden Mile area by Jesse Workman in 1902 (O’Donnell, 2006.). J. L. Walsh acquired the property in about 1916, but the property lay dormant from about 1918 to 1935. The bulk of the recorded historical production took place in 1935 and 1936. Ore was mined from a small open cut approximately 91 m (300 ft) x 30 m (100 ft) x 12 m (40 ft) deep, and from shallow underground workings beneath it. Total production at that time is reported to have been about 9,100 tonnes (10,000 short tons) at a gold grade of approximately 3.4 g/t Au (0.10 opst Au). Assays from two shipments of hand sorted ore shipped to the ASARCO smelter in Salt Lake City in 1936 are reported in Vanderburg (1937) as tabulated in Table 5.9. This mined material was copper-bearing magnetite skarn taken from the Main Zone at Golden Mile. Gangue material for this rock is described as iron oxide and calcite containing an average of 30% iron.
Table 5.9 1936 Production Assays (Vanderburg, 1937)
Reported Assays, 1936 | Gold (opst) | Silver (opst) | Copper (%) | Arsenic (%) |
Asarco Settlement Assay | 0.345 | 1.15 | 1.66 | 0.3 |
Union Assay Report | 0.26 | 1.2 | 1.06 | Trace |
53
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
6 | GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT |
6.1 | Regional Geology |
The Golden Mile property is located in the central portion of the Walker Lane trend, a major northwest-aligned structurally deformed zone on the western border of Nevada characterized by a series of closely spaced dextral strike-slip faults that have been active throughout much of the middle to late Cenozoic (Figs. 6.1 and 6.2). It is a complex accommodation zone up to 300 km (186 mi) wide and approximately 1,000 km (620 mi) long positioned between the western boundary of the extensional Basin and Range Province and the Sierra Nevada microplate. Translation along this boundary has been shown to accommodate nearly 20% of North American and Pacific plate translational motion (Ferranti et al., 2009; Carlson et al., 2013). This area remains tectonically active at present.
The Walker Lane trend is documented to be at least as old as 28 Ma and deformation has varied over time, with initial extension in a north to north-northeast direction and characterized by west-northwest to northwest-trending strike-slip faults. Locally these faults serve as the primary controls for mineralization at Golden Mile. Important regional structural timing (Albino and Boyer, 1992; Anderson et al., 2012; Colgan et al., 2006) of events includes:
Ø | 26 Ma: Initiation of Walker Lane (east-west alignments) |
Ø | 19 Ma: Middle stage Walker Lane (northwesterly alignment of faults, with possible left-lateral movements on NW aligned faults) |
Ø | 17–12 Ma: Basin and Range extension and late tilting (western Nevada) (N-NE trending structures) |
Ø | Post–17 Ma possible left-lateral strike-slip faulting, reactivation of basement faults? |
Regionally, the Golden Mile property is situated along the eastern flanks of the Cedar Mountains. The Cedar Mountains are underlain by Triassic to Jurassic aged carbonates and clastic rocks which have been intruded by Cretaceous to Tertiary dioritic to granitic intrusives (Kern, 1998). Quartz monzonite intrusives are most common. These rocks are overlain by Miocene to Pliocene age rhyolitic to basaltic volcanics and volcaniclastics. Miocene-Pliocene lake beds, including diatomite deposits, lap onto the edge of the range. Quaternary alluvium largely consisting of alluvial fans spreading from major drainages into adjacent valleys covers much of region. Large-scale folding of basement rocks has been mapped within the range which may be associated with the Sevier Orogeny. Principal faults on a regional scale are Tertiary-aged northwest-trending strike-slip faults of the Walker Lane trend.
54
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.1 Generalized Geologic Map of Nevada showing location of Golden Mile property (from Tingley, 1999).
55
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.2 Shaded relief map of western North America with state boundaries in white. Yellow shade indicates extent of Walker Lane defined by Carlson et. al. 2013. Fault zones are shown in red and defined as: ECSZ-Eastern
56
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
California shear zone; SAFZ-San Andres fault zone, GFZ-Garlock fault zone. Golden Mile property location is indicated with a red star (after Carlson et. al., 2013). Red box denotes Central Walker Lane.
57
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
6.2 | Local and Property Geology |
The oldest rocks on the Golden Mile property are the Triassic Luning Formation, composed of a thin bedded to massive sedimentary sequence of calcareous siltstone, thin- to medium-bedded limestone and dolomitic limestone, argillite and sandstone (Ray, 2016). The upper 150 m are dominantly carbonate rocks, locally quite fossiliferous.
The Luning Formation is unconformably overlain by Jurassic-age siliciclastic and lesser calcareous sedimentary rocks of the Dunlap Formation. Both formations have been folded and are now steeply to sub-vertically inclined. Both units have been intruded by various granitoid stocks, sills and dikes that include quartz diorite, granodiorite, quartz monzonite and felsic quartz-feldspar porphyry. One quartz diorite-granodiorite body is named “the Golden Mile Stock” and may be responsible for the Au-Cu (Fe) skarn mineralization (Ray, 2016). The stock is only exposed on surface in three small areas because most of its northern extent is covered by younger Tertiary volcanic rock. Most of the latter are a bimodal suite of felsic to mafic volcanic flows and tuffs.
The magnetite skarn in the Main Zone at Golden Mile was the primary source of historical production on the property. The vast majority of the exploration drilling has been directed towards the Main Zone, located on the patented mineral claims.
Geologic map of the Golden Mile property area showing the location of the Golden Mile Main Zone deposit is presented in Figure 6.3. Schematic cross-section looking northeast at Golden Mile is shown on Figure 6.4.
See Figure 6.5 for a map of the Main Zone deposit area of the Golden Mile property and Figure 6.6 for a stratigraphic column showing geology and alteration of the Main Zone area of the Golden Mile property.
58
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.3 Geologic Map of the Golden Mile Property Area (Location of Golden Mile Main Zone deposit shown as yellow star). Abbreviations: GM Stock = Golden Mile Stock, Jd = Jurassic Dunlap Fm, Qal = Quaternary Alluvium, TRL = Triassic Luning Fm, Ta = Tertiary andesite, Tb = Tertiary basalt, Tgd = Tertiary granodiorite, Tqm = Tertiary quartz monzonite, Tt = Tertiary tuff, Tv = Tertiary volcanics, fi and mi = undifferentiated age; felsic dike/alaskite (?) and porphyritic andesite (?), respectively.
59
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.4 Schematic cross-section looking northeast at Golden Mile (Location of cross-section shown on Figure 6.3).
60
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.5 Geologic Map of the Main Zone deposit area of the Golden Mile Property (Lithologic units described in Figure 6.6).
61
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.6 Stratigraphic Column Showing Geology and Alteration at the Golden Mile Property
6.2.1 Lithology
6.2.1.1 | Sedimentary Rocks |
The Luning Formation is well exposed south and SW of the Golden Mile Stock separated by a 50 to 250 m-wide belt of Jurassic- age Dunlap Formation (Ray, 2016). In the Main Zone area, the Luning Formation is marked by three prominent beds of impure limestone that lie 200 m apart and which occupy low topographic ridges. The bedded units trend SW to WSW, dip steeply either NW or SE and can be traced discontinuously along strike for up to 300 m. At their NE extremities, close to the contact with the Dunlap Formation, the limestone outcrops are 5 to 15 m wide but to the SW the three individual beds tend to
62
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
thicken and are up to 25 m wide. Locally, the limestones contain numerous veins of yellow-brown colored Fe carbonate that both follow and cross-cut the bedding. The southernmost limestone unit contains some Cu and Fe oxide showings that have been developed in shallow underground workings.
Several authors (O’Donnell, 2006; Suda, 2009) mention the presence in the district of the Triassic-age Gabbs Formation which conformably overlies the Luning rocks. Hudson (1998) describes the formation as being up to 75 m thick and comprising reddish, tan to green shale, siltstone and minor limestone. Hematite stain is common in these rocks.
The Jurassic-age Dunlap Formation unconformably overlies the Triassic rocks but where observed the contact between the two formations is marked by shearing and brittle faulting. This formation also forms a belt of variably altered sedimentary rocks that separate the Luning rocks from the Golden Mile Stock further north. The Dunlap Formation consists of massive marble to poorly bedded siliciclastic siltstones and quartzites with some minor, thin beds of limestone. Calcareous arkose and greywacke are also assigned to the Dunlap Formation. Many of these units are silicified and due to contact metamorphism hornfels rocks are present, presumably related to the intrusion of the Golden Mile Stock. The hornfels rocks also host the most prominent, structurally- controlled magnetite-Cu-Au exoskarn, exposed in the Golden Mile Main Zone (Fig. 6.7).
Figure 6.7 Magnetite-Copper Skarn of the Main Zone at Golden Mile. Photo on right shows metasomatic bands of mainly magnetite and calcite.
6.2.1.2Volcanic Rocks
A series of Tertiary-aged post-mineral rhyolitic ash flow crystal tuffs and dark andesitic to basaltic flows overlie the Mesozoic rocks at Golden Mile. Some of the volcanic rocks, especially the more mafic flows, host magnetite. Synvolcanic intrusive rocks including a rhyolitic plug, quartz porphyry dykes and andesitic dykes are also reported in the area. Thin veneers of basalt flows cap some of the hills in the property area.
63
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
6.2.1.3Intrusive Rocks
High-level plutons, dikes and sills, assumed to be either Cretaceous or Tertiary age, intrude the Mesozoic sedimentary rocks. Ferguson and Muller (1949) estimated the age of the intrusions in the northern Cedar Mountains as Jurassic. Two age dates were subsequently performed on the rocks of the Cedar Pass pluton. The first date was 40 + 10 Ma (Eocene) using the lead alpha method from zircon from the granitic mass about 8 km (5 mi) southeast of the Simon mine on Cedar Mountain (Ross, 1961). The second date was a K-Ar age run on a biotite separate from a small pod of quartz monzodiorite that crops out on the southern contact of the Cedar Pass pluton (Pullman,1983). The biotite separate yielded a date of 24.2 + 1.0 Ma (Oligocene). The known margins and extent of the intrusions are poorly constrained owing to widespread extent of post-mineral volcanic cover rocks, but their age definitely appears to be Tertiary.
Hornfels and garnet-magnetite skarns are developed along the margins of the intrusive bodies. Skarn rocks are present along structures in both sedimentary and intrusive rocks. An elongate dike-like body of quartz porphyry or rhyolite composition cuts the Mesozoic sediments and parallels the main trend of mineralization. This highly siliceous and hydrothermally altered fine-grained rock may contain 2-4% disseminated pyrite. Its age is assumed to be Cretaceous or Tertiary and relationship to the quartz diorite plutons is uncertain.
In the Main Zone area at Golden Mile mineralization appears associated with two larger intrusive bodies, the most economically important being the Golden Mile Stock which is the probable source of the mineralizing skarn fluids (Ray, 2016). Another much larger but much less mineralized felsic body lies NW of the Golden Mile Stock and is named the “Northwest Pluton”.
The Golden Mile Stock is only exposed in three small areas, however to the north it is unconformably overlain by the suite of Tertiary volcanics. According to Ray (2016), some historic drilling though the volcanics into the underlying stock show that the volcanic cover is often very thin (<25 m). Thus, prior to the volcanic eruption the stock was probably erosionally recessive resulting in topographic low ground which was infilled by the volcanic flows. The three separate surface exposures of the Golden Mile Stock are believed to belong to a single large body that extends northwards beneath the Tertiary cover and also possibly southwards below the sedimentary siliciclastic Dunlap Formation. Thus, the stock could be a relatively large body, and any reactive limey rocks adjacent to the stock’s margin beneath the Tertiary flows or Dunlap Formation could host mineralized skarn or replacement deposits.
The Golden Mile stock is comprised of dark, massive, medium to coarse-grained quartz-diorite- granodiorite that is locally quartz-rich; it is estimated to contain between 8% to 15% hornblende with trace biotite (Ray, 2016). It can be moderately porphyritic with larger crystals of feldspar and ferromagnesian minerals. In places close to the stock’s contact with the Dunlap Formation the intrusive rocks tend to be lighter colored and finer grained. In many places the stock is cut by stockwork veins of thin quartz and feldspar, some of which contain small quantities of pyrite and trace chalcopyrite. In two areas the stock is overprinted by garnet endoskarn alteration, the most westerly of these areas also includes the presence of magnetite and significant gold mineralization.
64
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The Northwest Pluton is a pale pink to white colored, leucocratic quartzo-feldspathic rock of probable quartz monzonite composition. The ground mass varies from fine to medium grained and the rock contains scattered phenocrysts of rounded, glassy quartz that reach 0.2 cm in diameter. Lesser amounts of feldspar phenocrysts are also present, together with minute traces of a small, dark, unidentified ferro-magnesian mineral that when weathered leaves small pits. Some trace fine grained sericite is also present. Many outcrops of the Northwest Pluton are cut by veins and veinlets of gray vuggy quartz up to 0.5 cm in thickness and spaced 1 to 5 cm apart. Many veins have a NW to NNW orientation which is sub-parallel to a prominent fault in the area. In addition to the veins, the weathered pluton is also marked by thin zones and spots of jarosite staining, many of which lie sub-parallel to the quartz veins.
Also present in the area are several widely scattered dikes and sills. Between the Main Zone and margin of the Golden Mile Stock at least two thin (<5 m; 16 ft) dikes of hornblende porphyry granodiorite are seen; these are probably related to the stock, and the altered siliciclastic rocks immediately adjacent to one dike has Cu and Fe oxide staining. In addition, there are highly leucocratic, quartz-feldspar-rich dikes. One of the larger dikes is at least 60 m (197 ft) long and 15 m (49 ft) wide and trends NE, sub- parallel to the Main Zone, as do other thinner dikes located further west in the Luning Formation (Ray, 2016).
Another noteworthy set of dikes cuts the Northwest Pluton, NW of the Golden Mile Stock. These dikes are comprised of an unaltered, medium to dark grey, feldspar-porphyritic, medium to coarse grained rock of granodiorite composition. Locally, these dikes have abundant glassy quartz, and the feldspar phenocrysts reach 0.3 mm in size. Some outcrops have small (<1.5 cm), rounded dark xenoliths that when weathered become jarosite-stained. Another distinctive feature is that many elongate feldspars have a sub-parallel orientation and locally the rocks contain thin flow-bands that reach 2 mm in width. At least four outcrops have been observed and are believed to represent two dikes, each < 5 m (16 ft) thick which trend NW-SE, parallel to the quartz veinlets in the Northwest Pluton and a fault in the Main Zone area. The age of the dikes is unknown although they could represent feeders for some of the more siliceous overlying Tertiary volcanics (Ray, 2016).
6.2.2 Structural Geology
There are two dominant structural trends on the property, namely (i) NW-SE which is parallel to the Walker Lane Fault Zone and (ii) NNE to NE which is nearly orthogonal to the Walker Lane. The latter appears to be the trend of the Main Zone which is spatially associated with the strongest exoskarn mineralization seen on surface. Some northeast trending faults are occupied by dykes. The true dip of the 200 to 300 m-long Main Zone Fault is unknown and at its southern end it is sharply truncated by the NW-trending “Road Fault” which appears to be a major dextral feature (Fig. 6.8).
The Road Fault separates the Dunlap rocks from the Luning and surface mapping and drilling in the Main Zone indicates the Road Fault dips steeply to the northeast. The Road Fault is not apparently mineralized. Northwest faults, like the Road Fault, appear to offset the northeast faults with dextral displacement and offset extensions of the northeast structures may be possible drill targets. Past workers had interpreted the Road Fault to be part of the Tertiary Walker Lane generation of structures, assigning northeast dips
65
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
and possibly substantial post-mineral right lateral offsets. Teck geologists (Kuzma, 1999) have suggested this fault is in fact older - a thrust fault along which a nappe of Luning-Gabbs-Dunlap rock is thrust over the Dunlap. They suggest that the thrust was subsequently rotated into a high angle orientation, possibly during folding.
Figure 6.8 Road Fault mylonite breccia (Hole GMDD-13 @ 315 ft)
Where exposed, the rocks of both the Luning and Dunlap Formations mostly strike SW-NE and are steeply inclined (50 degrees to sub-vertical) with dips either to the NW or SE. No small-scale folds were seen but the northernmost elongate limestone unit of the Luning Formation has a pronounced fracture cleavage. Although abundant structural data is lacking, Ray (2016) noted it is possible that the three elongate limestone units of the Luning represent part of a single bedded horizon that was deformed by tight folds having SW to WSW trending axial planes and wavelengths of 200 m (575 ft).
Fractures associated with the Walker Lane NW-SE trend are observed cutting the Northwest Pluton (Ray, 2016). This includes a 0.6 m (2 ft) -wide, NW striking fault that dips 62 degrees NE. This rusty zone contains tectonic slices of silicified, Fe-oxide-stained rock and quartz vein material. There are also some post fault quartz veins up to 2 cm (0.79 in) thick; these have crystal-lined vugs up to 0.75 cm (0.30 in) in diameter. Two narrow flow-banded granodiorite dikes were also observed by Ray to intrude the NW striking fault set.
A recent detailed oriented core study was undertaken in conjunction with Oriented Targeting Systems and Burtner (2021) concluded that gold grade is controlled by a mix of structural and lithological factors. He defined three structural grade zones: Southwest, Central and Northeast (Fig. 6.9). Although well-
66
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
defined spatially, the structural zones do not fully explain the grade geometry. The strongest steep, NW-SE striking structures may be the first order control of gold grade.
Figure 6.9 3D Structural Interpretation of the Southwest, Central and Northeast Structural Grade Zones of the Main Zone at Golden Mile (Burtner, 2021).
The “SW Grade Zone” is restricted to magnetite skarn alteration. Grade does not appear to be strongly correlated with veining. The skarn alteration is likely to have a structural control, but it’s timing is unclear. According to Burtner (2021), if the magnetite skarn is related to the Jurassic intrusions, it is unlikely to be related to the more recent dextral faulting. If the skarn is related to the Tertiary intrusions, there may be an association with the Road Fault tectonics.
The “Central Grade Zone” is controlled by splays associated with dextral Road Fault motion. The dominant steep, NW-SE striking splay fabric forms a primary control on localizing high-grade zones (Fig. 6.10). This Central Zone may be bounded by a fault on the eastside (East Margin fault), but the limit is less clear to the west. Depending on the nature of the western margin, this zone may be a diffuse damage zone in the hanging wall of the East Margin fault, or a zone of distributed damage between two dextral fault splays. Within the high-grade corridor, grade is strongly correlated to steep NW-dipping vein arrays, roughly orthogonal to bounding faults. Within the splay-controlled corridors, lithologic control was also evident from the oriented core study and the Dunlap unit hosts much of the veining, while the quartz diorite unit appears much less favorable.
67
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
68
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Fig. 6.10 Examples of high-grade gold intercepts from the Center Grade Zone, A) Hole GMDD-002, 8.5 – 10.1 m (28-33 ft); assay 17.45 ppm (0.51 opst) Au, B) Hole GMDD-004, 64.6-66.1 m (212-217 ft); assay 8.66 ppm (0.25 opst) Au (Burtner, 2021)
69
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The “NE Grade Zone” is also lithologically controlled. There appears to be a spatial association between the high-grade intervals and the quartz diorite-Dunlap contacts, with gold concentrated more favorably in the Dunlap unit. Some degree of structural control may also be present in this zone, with higher grades associated with intersections between the NW-SE splay fabric and the quartz diorite-Dunlap contact.
Burtner (2021) suggested that structural fabrics, both faults and veins, agree with a complex dextral-slip fault model of the Road Fault (Fig. 6.11) with primary splays control the Central Grade Zone and smaller, possible subsidiary faults. These correspond to the dominant NW-SE striking, steep faults. In the Central Grade Zone, these splays are represented by the interpreted East Margin and West Margin Faults. The P-splays are orthogonal to a mineralized NW-dipping fabric that locally controls the highest gold grades within the Central Grade trend. This fabric corresponds to the NW-dipping veins and is reflected in the NW-dipping fault population.
Figure 6.11 Conceptual Structural Model showing the structural fabrics of faults and veins related to splays the dextral-slip Road Fault model. Splays represented by interpreted East Margin Fault (solid green) and West Margin Fault (dashed green) from Burtner (2021).
70
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
6.2.3Alteration and Mineralization
Gold mineralization is variably associated with calc-silicate skarn, magnetite skarn, and structurally controlled limonite-calcite-silica stockworks. Copper is associated with the gold mineralization in the magnetite skarn in the Main Zone. However, gold-only mineralization is also present on the property, particularly in the more distal quartz-sericite-limonite stockworks.
Calc-silicate skarn minerals include fine disseminated, spotty, or banded garnet present in the calcareous siltstones adjacent to the quartz diorite. A pyroxene-garnet skarn (in various ratios) is present in the carbonate rocks and in the intrusions themselves (as endoskarn). Biotite hornfels overprinting the main host rock Dunlap Formation locally forms ubiquitous contact metamorphic aureoles surrounding the intrusions. Retrograde assemblages of chlorite-epidote-calcite and quartz-sericite-calcite-clay are also noted in the intrusive rocks and along structures in the skarns developed in sediments.
Gold bearing calc-silicate skarn assemblages are overprinted and replaced by magnetite and copper-gold skarn assemblages near quartz diorite. Magnetite skarn has been encountered in three places on the Golden Mile property thus far:
1. | in the Main Zone associated with a quartz monzonite intrusion |
2. | beneath a partly silicified ridge east of the Main Zone associated with a magnetic high |
3. | west of the Main Zone, associated with another occurrence of quartz diorite. |
Calcite, sericite, and pyrite are associated with these skarn assemblages, particularly in siliciclastic rocks. Distal to the intrusion(s), along permeable structures and breccia, alteration associated with the metasomatic and mineralizing fluids is expressed as quartz stockworks with associated iron oxides, calcite and green sericite. Gold is also present in this setting, but copper values are low.
A series of narrow, northwest-trending bands of pervasive silicification and silicified breccia are present in locally calcareous siltstones along a northeast-trending ridge east of the historical workings. Limonite coated fractures and elevated gold values associated with arsenic and bismuth suggests a distal expression of the mineralized system. Pyrite and propylitic alteration with calcite are present in the Tertiary volcanic rocks. However, these assemblages are interpreted to be younger than the main mineralizing event.
6.2.3.1Main Zone
The Main Zone consists of irregular replacement pods and veins hosted in the Luning limestone and the Dunlap calcareous siltstone along a northeast trending margin of a granodiorite intrusion. The Main Zone is exposed in small open pits and trenches and can be traced for about 300 m (984 ft) in a northeasterly direction. The mineralization includes assemblages of magnetite, garnet, biotite, sericite, calcite, pyrite and chalcopyrite. Sulfides frequently exceed 5% by volume. Intrusive rocks in this area display pyroxene garnet skarn assemblages, and in some places return elevated gold values in the 0.3 g/t Au (0.009 opst) range. Copper and silver values accompany gold values in the vicinity of the historical workings. Free gold
71
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
is reported in the Main Zone and in the stockwork zones to the northeast. Distribution of the highest-grade gold values is interpreted to be related to northwest-trending structures.
6.2.3.2Stockwork Zones
To the northeast of the Main Zone, a series of steep structures trending at 030° are mineralized with gold-bearing stockworks of quartz-sericite-pyrite-calcite veinlets in siltstone (Suda, 2009). Three drill holes are reported by Battle Mountain to have intercepted high-grade gold values in this material ranging from 1.2 g/t Au (0.034 opst) over 7.6 m (25 ft) in Hole 89-20, up to 16.4 g/t Au (0.478 opst) over 29 m (95 ft) in Hole 89-7 occurring in sericite-iron oxide-quartz-gold veinlets cutting sericitized siltstone (Gatchell, 1989).
Further along the extension of the structure to the northeast, a stockwork of calcite-pyrite-limonite quartz occurs in dioritic rocks. This mineralization is not exposed at surface but was intersected by drilling through volcanic cover rocks.
6.2.3.3Detailed Description of Skarn Alteration
Ray (2016) described in more detail the skarn alteration types noted on the Golden Mile property:
· | Hornfels and/or silicification with abundant silica, moderate amounts of epidote and trace to very rare quantities of fine-grained garnet and biotite. This mostly overprints the siliciclastic rocks of the Dunlap Formation and is believed to be mainly related to the emplacement of the Golden Mile Stock. |
· | Exoskarn with variable amounts of quartz, pale brown to green garnet, magnetite, epidote, chlorite, amphibole, Cu and Fe oxides and gold. Exoskarn formed in the more dolomitic carbonates may contain abundant phlogopite with traces of brucite and serpentinite. On surface, fault-controlled exoskarn alteration is best seen along the Main Zone where the magnesian mineral phlogopite may be locally abundant. |
· | Endoskarn alteration in the Golden Mile Stock marked by minor amounts of garnet, epidote, quartz and pyrite along narrow fractures, or as massive replacement by garnet, quartz, epidote, amphibole, disseminated magnetite and possible some clinopyroxene. This massive endoskarn alteration yielded the highest gold values of the 59 rock samples collected by Ray (2016), containing between 4.5 and 11.5 g/t Au (0.131 and 0.336 opst). |
· | Massive magnetite lenses and pods which only occur along the Main Zone. Pods may be up to 10 m (33 ft) wide and 25 m (82 ft) long and were subjected to shallow historic mining for their associated Cu sulfides, Cu oxides and gold. |
· | Marble is not particularly common on surface. It is seen in the Luning Formation immediately SW of the Road Fault where the rock is fault brecciated with calcite veining and strong jarosite staining. Marble was also seen at one location in the Dunlap where the silicious hornfels contains a 1.5 m (4.9 ft) thick unit of thinly bedded marble. |
· | Quartz-feldspar vein stockworks occur in the Golden Mile Stock. Many parts of the stock are cut by a network of thin (< 4 cm; 1.6 in) quartz-feldspar veins that locally carry minor calcite, pyrite |
72
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
and trace chalcopyrite. Veins may have narrow bleached haloes and in some outcrops the stock has rusty weathering zones that are presumable after pyrite.
· | Quartz veinlets are developed in the Northwest Pluton. It comprises veins and veinlets of gray vuggy quartz up to 0.5 cm (0.2 in) in thickness that are spaced 1 to 5 cm (0.4 to 2.0 in) apart. In addition, the weathered pluton also has thin zones and spots of jarosite staining, many of which lie sub-parallel to the quartz veins. Samples of the veined and jarosite-stained rock showed no evidence of gold mineralization. |
· | Yellow-brown Fe carbonate veining is observed in the western parts of the Luning limestone. These veins both cross-cut and follow the bedding and are generally < 15 cm (5.9 in) in thickness although in some rare instances they reach 0.75 m (0.3 in). Most have sharp contacts with the impure limestone. Initially it was thought possible that the veins were a distal expression of the Golden Mile skarn system, but sampling showed they are barren of any base or precious metals. |
6.2.3.3.1Exoskarn
On surface, all of the alteration within the Golden Mile Stock thermal aureole is hosted by the Dunlap Formation and there is no evidence that the Luning Formation rocks are skarn-altered (Ray, 2016). In the Dunlap rocks away from the Main Zone it is often difficult to distinguish between the abundant and widespread silica-rich hornfels and true fine-grained exoskarn related to hydrothermal fluids. Overall, exoskarn is uncommon apart from along or close to the Main Zone. The local abundance of phlogopite along the Main Zone suggests that some of the alteration along this structure represents magnesian skarn. This may be one reason why massive magnetite lenses preferentially formed along this structure since Fe skarn-development tends to favor magnesian rather than calcic skarn systems (Einaudi et al., 1981).
The exoskarn and alteration seen on surface and that observed in some of the drill core are very different. In the holes there are thick intersections of pale brown, medium to coarse grained, grossular garnet-rich skarn that presumably replaced massive limestone beds. This exoskarn in the core is locally cut by thin sulfide veins and veinlets containing pyrite and trace chalcopyrite. The veins are also surrounded by bleached haloes that reach 1.5 cm in width. On surface by contrast, massive, coarse grained garnet skarn similar to that seen in the drill holes is virtually absent. Instead, with the exception of rocks in the Main Zone, exoskarn is rarely seen on the property and when present it comprises silicified or hornfels meta-sediments that may contain patches of fracture-controlled fine-grained, pale brown garnet that are presumed to be hydrothermal in origin. This surface exoskarn is locally retrograde altered to epidote ± chlorite ± amphibole, and in rare instances it may contain some trace chalcopyrite with Cu oxides and pyrite but is generally unmineralized. In a few localities these silica-rich, hornfelsic rocks contain thin veins (< 10 cm) of garnet-pyrite ± epidote exoskarn which have followed the remnant bedding planes in the Dunlap Formation.
The probable reason for the abundance of massive garnet-rich exoskarn observed in drill holes and the generally garnet-poor alteration observed on surface is due to the host rocks at the latter mostly represent Dunlap Formation siliciclastic sediments that reacted poorly to the skarn-forming fluids. Thus, major differences exist between the sedimentary geology on surface compared to the originally limestone-rich rocks (intersected at depth).
73
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The Main Zone is a 200 m (656 ft)-long linear feature of exoskarn alteration that varies from 20 to 50 m 66 to 164 ft) in width. It is marked by large pods and lenses of massive to semi- massive magnetite that reach 10 m in thickness and 15 to 25 m (49 to 82 ft) in length. The magnetite is spatially associated with variable quantities of quartz veining, pyrite and chalcopyrite, and many outcrops have brilliant displays of Cu oxides and silicates that include malachite, azurite, chrysocolla and minor turquoise, as well as some Mn wad and black Cu-Mn oxides. The magnetite lenses are marked by open pits and some shallow underground workings that were driven to extract the copper and possibly also the gold. All six samples collected by Ray from the Main Zone were anomalous in gold (266 ppb to 2390 ppb) as well as having high values of copper (maximum 9 % Cu). The samples were also anomalous in As, Ag, Zn, Sb, Se and sporadically anomalous in Te.
The Main Zone is believed to be a pre-skarn structure that was a conduit for the hydrothermal fluids. On surface, however, the meta-sediments lying between the Golden Mile Stock and the Main Zone largely comprise a 50 to 70 m (164 to 230 ft) wide belt of Dunlap Formation siliciclastic rocks that are hornfels or overprinted by varying degrees of silicification with minor sporadic garnet exoskarn, but no significant mineralization.
6.2.3.3.2Endoskarn
Garnet-bearing endoskarn was observed by Ray (2016) at two locations in the Golden Mile Stock. Here there is an adit that has been driven in an ESE direction into dark, quartz-rich rock, close to the southern margin of the Golden Mile Stock. The intrusive rocks are strongly epidotized and there are small patches of brown garnet endoskarn alteration. Also, some N-S striking fractures and joints contain thin (< 1.5 cm; 0.6 in) veins with quartz, epidote and pale green garnet. Locally in the veins there appears to also be trace wollastonite.
A larger and better mineralized area of endoskarn alteration lies 200 m (656 ft) further west where there are several small shallow pits and one adit. The outcrops and subcrops in this vicinity comprise a coarse grained dark green rock that contains both a pale green glassy garnet and lesser amounts of pale brown garnet. Also present are quartz, remnant igneous feldspar and some epidote, as well as possibly some clino-pyroxene. Trace to minor quantities of chalcopyrite, pyrite and Cu oxides also occur. One notable feature about this area is that the endoskarn contains scattered clots of magnetite up to 1 cm (0.4 in) in diameter that in places are surrounded by thin haloes of gray quartz. Locally there are also rounded crystals or clots of quartz up to 0.3 m (1 ft) wide as well as rusty-weathering zones that are 2 to 3 cm (0.8 to 1.2 in) in diameter. Three of the five endoskarn samples taken from this vicinity contained the highest gold values of all 59 samples collected by Ray (2016). The gold content in these three samples ranged between 4.54 to 11.5 g/t Au (0.133 to 0.335 opst), and the latter was taken from an outcrop at the adit entrance with strong Cu and Fe oxide staining. In addition to Au, the samples contain anomalous values of Ag (maximum 16.6 ppm), Cu (up to 7060 ppm) as well as As, Bi, Sb, Se and Te. Significantly the gold-rich samples are not particularly enriched in Cu which suggests that some of the gold may not be carried in chalcopyrite.
74
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The presence of gold-rich endoskarn is one highly unusual feature of the Golden Mile skarn system. According to Ray (2016), in virtually all skarn deposits worldwide, it is the exoskarn rather than the endoskarn that forms the most significant mining resource. Nevertheless, the Golden Mile endoskarn should be further explored since it may extend northwards beneath the Tertiary volcanic and perhaps represent an open pit or underground mining target.
In June 2021, Lawrence Meinert, renowned expert on skarn deposits, visited the Golden Mile property (Meinert, 2021). Based on drill holes examined and outcrops observed in the field, it was determined that there are two main types of alteration at Golden Mile, hornfels and skarn. Meinert (2021) also concluded that hornfels is the more extensive alteration type and consists of a background biotite hornfels in clastic rocks of the Dunlap Formation (Fig 6.12 A & B). All examined exposures of Dunlap Formation on surface and in drill core have been converted to biotite hornfels. As with most gold skarns, this likely forms an aureole around the ore deposit.
The other main alteration type observed is skarn formed from carbonate rocks. From the observed mineralogy, most of the skarn protolith in the Golden Mile district was dolomitic. This results in magnesian skarn minerals such as forsterite (Mg2SiO4), monticellite (CaMgSiO4), diopside (CaMgSi2O6) (Fig. 6.12 C), spinel (MgAl2O4), periclase (MgO), humite ((Mg,Fe2+)7(SiO4)3(F,OH)2), clinohumite (Mg9(SiO4)4F2), chondrodite (Mg5(SiO4)2F2), phlogopite (KMg3(AlSi3O10)(OH)2) (Fig. 6.12 D), tremolite ({Ca2}{Mg5}(Si8O22)(OH)2), pargasite (NaCa2(Mg4Al)(Si6Al2)O22(OH)2), ludwigite (Mg2Fe3+(BO3)O2), chondrodite (Mg5(SiO4)2F2), talc (Mg3Si4O10(OH)2), serpentine (Mg3[Si2O5](OH)4), and brucite (Mg(OH)2) (Fig. 6.12 E). Because of the dominance of Mg rather than Fe in the skarn minerals, the excess Fe typically forms abundant magnetite, as observed in the Main Zone pit. The magnetite is particularly important as a reactant for later, lower temperature Au-bearing fluids.
A variety of igneous rock types are exposed on the surface and in drill core at Golden Mile. The coarse-grained equigranular granodiorite and quartz monzonite plutons to the northwest of the Golden Mile district, Meinert (2021) believed are likely unrelated to Golden Mile alteration and mineralization, due to their igneous texture and interpreted >5km (3 mi) depth of emplacement. Instead, the two igneous rock types most likely to be related to alteration and mineralization are the porphyritic granodiorite (also called microgranodiorite, (Fig. 6.12 F & G) and the quartz monzonite porphyry (sometimes called quartz feldspar porphyry when exact mineralogy/composition is not visible (Fig. 6.12 H).
75
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.12 Alteration and Mineralization Types Observed at Golden Mile (Meinert, 2021). A) Biotite hornfels cut by pyroxene veins (Hole GMDD-2 @ 51 m (168 ft); assay 2.7 g/t (0.079 opst) Au, B) Biotite hornfels cut by quartz-chlorite-pyrite (Au) veins with feldspar-clay envelope (Hole GMDD-3 @ 58 m (190 ft), C) Biotite hornfels cut by quartz-chlorite-pyrite veins with pyroxene-feldspar envelope (Hole GMDD-3 @ 146 m (478 ft), D) Thin quartz-chlorite-phlogopite (Au) vein, E) Lime-green brucite replacing magnesium skarn minerals such as olivine-pyroxene, F) Microgranodiorite with veins of pyroxene-epidote (Hole GMDD-2 @ 109 m (358 ft), G) Granodiorite cut by quartz-pyrite-chlorite vein with feldspar-clay envelope (Hole GMDD-6 @80 m (263 ft); assay 1.75 g/t (0.051 opst) Au, H) Quartz-feldspar porphyry (Hole GMDD-2 @ 28 m (93 ft).
76
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
6.2.4Petrography
A limited amount of historic petrographic work was completed for Golden Mile. However, one report completed included a petrographic description of thin sections prepared from RC drill cuttings of two holes drilled by Teck (Hudson, 1999). Highlights of the descriptions include:
● | A gold mineralized sample (0.99 g/t Au; 0.029 opst) studied by Hudson contained chips of garnet-rich skarn with 60 to 90% very pale green garnet (possibly grossularite) with subhedral grains up to 0.7 mm (0.3 in) across; the original rock was probably limestone. |
● | A sample containing coarse blocky calcite with poikilitic inclusions of diopside, anhedral calcite grains were as large as 2 mm (0.8 in) and diopside grain sized ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 mm (0.004 to 0.02 in). Minor white mica and wollastonite were also observed in some chips. Hudson interpreted this calcite-diopside skarn to be a reaction skarn of dolomitic limestone with quartz in the limestone or siliceous beds (quartzite or chert) close by. The granular calcite was believed to be a retrograde alteration of the silicate minerals. |
● | A few thin sections studied contained chips of weakly altered, equigranular pyroxene diorite (or gabbro) with up to 65% subhedral to anhedral plagioclase (An50) and varying amounts anhedral diopside (possibly hypersthene). In some chips, the pyroxene had been variably replaced by actinolite associated with minor amounts of calcite, epidote and chlorite. |
Hudson also reported that in some thin sections pyroxene has been replaced by an isotropic, moderate relief mineral, possibly bicchulite (Ca2Al(SiAl)O7H2O). Bicchulite probably resulted from some endoskarn formation at the contact of the diorite with limestone and skarn formation resulted from a consider able influx of silica and alumina. Hudson believed the kaolin in both the endoskarn and exoskarn represents a late, low temperature hydration event, possiblyas a result of the gold depositing stage.
A more recent petrographic study was completed on 15 rock grab samples and 6 drill core samples collected from the Golden Mile property (Dunne, 2017) and included transmitted and reflected light observations, description of lithology, alteration, and mineralization. Dunne (2017) also reported results for samples submitted for XRD-Rietveld analyses at the Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada and for Terraspec spectroradiometer analyses.
Samples studied by Dunne (2017) consisted of a varied and complex assemblage of lithologies, contact metamorphic assemblages, metasomatic alteration minerals, retrograde alteration minerals, veins and microfractures, mineralization and weathered mineralogy. Samples included intrusive rock, carbonate sedimentary rock, variably silicified and hornfels siliciclastic rocks as well as prograde garnet and clinopyroxene skarn, massive magnetite, retrograde skarn alteration, semi-massive sulfide, late veinlets, microfractures and oxidized and argillized zones.
77
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Lithologies studied included:
● | Intrusive Rock: variably altered granitoid and rhyolite porphyry |
● | Carbonate Sedimentary Rock: bioclastic wackestone (Luning) including a variety of skeletal particles in a matrix supported carbonate sediment |
● | Silicified and Hornfels Siliciclastic Rock: including calc-silicate hornfels and hornfelsic metasandstone |
Types of alteration identified in the suite of samples studied included:
● | Potassic/Hornfels |
● | Magnetite Skarn |
● | Endoskarn |
● | Exoskarn |
● | Retrograde Skarn |
● | Secondary Alteration (argillic, propylitic, oxide) |
Mineralization identified in the suite of samples studied by Dunne (2017) included sulfides and gold. Sulfide commonly occurs in trace amounts as fine to very fine-grained chalcopyrite + (rare chalcocite+covellite+ possible bornite), platy molybdenite, arsenopyrite, marcasite, pyrite and/or pyrrhotite. Sulfide minerals occur either as disseminations, within veinlets/microfractures or in semi-massive form. Rare traces of gold were optically visible and reported in many of the samples. Gold was demonstrated to occur in a variety of settings including with sulfide minerals, oxide, and clay-rich zones.
A variety of veinlets and late microfractures were also observed in the samples. Mineralization is documented in some garnet-bearing veinlets, quartz-K-feldspar veinlets and in some quartz-calcite and carbonate microfractures (Dunne, 2017).
Table 6.1 summarizes petrographic observations for individual samples studied from the Golden Mile property (Dunne, 2017). Figure 6.13 shows photomicrographs of a typical altered skarn.
78
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 6.1 Summary Table of Petrography on Samples from Golden Mile (from Dunne, 2017)
79
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
80
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 6.1 Summary Table of Petrography on Samples from Golden Mile (from Dunne, 2017) (con’t)
81
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
82
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.13 Photomicrographs of Typical Skarn from Golden Mile (Sample GR-427). Note strong brittle fracturing of garnet and clinopyroxene, possible patchy gypsum alteration and clay-gypsum and Fe-ox filled microfractures. Field of View = 2.9 mm (0.11 in), A) Polarized Light, B) Cross-Polarized Light; Abbreviations: cpx = clinopyroxene, phl = phlogopite, gn = garnet, gyp = possible gypsum (from Dunne, 2017).
83
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
84
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
6.3 | DEPOSIT |
Gold and gold-copper mineralization on the Golden Mile property is intrusion-related with different styles depending on setting. Mineralization occurs as skarn, massive replacements and structurally controlled stockwork and breccia zones in permeable rocks. Gold and gold-copper mineralization is mainly hosted in carbonate-bearing metasedimentary rocks, which remain the primary exploration target on the property. Secondary targets include the structural zones, within both sedimentary and intrusive hosts. Low-grade disseminated gold mineralization within the quartz diorite intrusions also is indicated as a possible target based upon the results of drilling.
Typically, intrusive-related and skarn-hosted gold deposits are challenging exploration targets because it is difficult to define coherent concentrations of economic gold mineralization within the overall body of the intrusion and skarn. However, several notable mines have been developed on gold skarns, including the Fortitude Mine in the Battle Mountain District, which produced 77 tonnes (2.5 million ounces) of gold from 10.9 Mt (12M short tons) of ore at an average grade of 7.1 g/t (0.21 opst) gold (Doebrich and Theodore, 1996). The adjacent Phoenix deposit was a low-grade gold deposit that reportedly yielded over 2 million ounces of gold with associated copper and silver. The Buckhorn Mountain gold deposit in Washington State was another notable gold skarn deposit (Hickey, 1992). Disseminated gold mineralization, together with related structure-controlled gold in granitic host rocks, has been defined as a deposit type with significant potential. An example is the Fort Knox deposit in central Alaska, which has produced nearly 8 million ounces of gold since mining began in 1996 (Wikipedia, 2021).
6.3.1 | Extents and Continuity |
Within the Golden Mile property area, the approximate extents of Main Zone mineralization are 900 m (3,000 ft) long by 500 m (1,500 ft) wide. The deposit shows internal geological and grade continuity, with a consistent direction of mineralization. The approximate dimensions of the deposit are based on a grade shell constructed at a nominal cutoff grade of 0.34 g/t Au (0.010 opst) used to limit grade interpolation in the 3D block model.
Figure 6.14 demonstrates a conceptual ore deposit model for Golden Mile.
85
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 6.14 Conceptual Model for Formation of the Golden Mile Deposit (Cox and Singer, 1986)
86
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
7 | EXPLORATION |
Past exploration programs have been summarized in Section 5 (History). Section 7 herein describes the nature and extent of all relevant exploration work conducted by GRCN.
7.1 | Exploration Work by GRCN |
Prior to GRCN’s acquisition, Kinross had identified at least 11 gold prospect sites on the property. Figure 7.1 show the land position of Kinross from 2017 to 2019, at the time of their lease, and highlights significant prospects identified for targeting. Upon acquisition, GRCN immediately began evaluating of these targets for exploration. The Golden Mile Main Zone deposit and Spring (PS) mineral occurrence are considered the highest priority prospects with already delineated resource potential.
Figure 7.1 Resource Areas and Drill Ready Targets Identified on the Golden Mile Property (from Kinross, 2019). Resources for Golden Mile and PS targets, in oz Au, are only estimates by Kinross to indicate exploration potential.
87
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
7.1.1 Remote Sensing
The initial exploration approach by GRCN was to use spectral data for vectoring to higher temperature alteration which can be very useful given the documented alteration footprint. In addition, to local targeting with grid sampling and spectral analysis, regional targeting for gold exploration can search for the products of hydrothermal alteration where mineral-bearing rocks were displaced by strong geothermal systems.
In July 2020, GRCN contracted Terra Modelling Services Inc. (TMS) to conduct an analysis of available ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) satellite data for the Golden Mile property. The deliverables of this analysis included:
1. | Date and time of the ASTER data set used; |
2. | Copies of raw data; |
3. | GranuleID from the raw data; |
4. | Band identifiers, both ASTER band and USGS reference; |
5. | Band ratios used and spatial resolution charts. |
6. | Structural interpretation; |
7. | Quartz content map; |
8. | Differentiations of argillic, phyllic, propylitic, and silicic alterations; |
9. | Characterization of areas for illite, crystalline kaolinite, dickite and possible vegetation anomalies; |
10. | All ferric and non-ferric oxides (jarosite, goethite, hematite); |
11. | False color composites (map); |
12. | Powerpoint-style report accompanying the data, highlighting results. |
Anomalous high hydrothermal alteration spectral analysis identified numerous target areas for ground follow-up on the Golden Mile property (Fig. 7.2). Potential mineral targets are mostly aligned with major EW and NW-trending structures and have spectral and vegetation anomalies.
88
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 7.2 Golden Mile Property Map Highlighting Hydrothermal Alteration and Exploration Target Areas Identified from ASTER Analysis (Golden Mile deposit and Spring mineral occurrence are shown; faults shown as dashed black lines)
7.2 | Drilling |
7.2.1 Core Drilling
GRCN 2020 – 2021 core drilling was performed on diurnal shifts (24 hours/7 days per week) by Ruen Drilling (Ruen), Clark Fork, Montana. Two sizes of DDH drill core were utilized: a large diameter “PQ” 85.0 mm (3.35 in) for metallurgical testing, and a smaller “HQ” 63.5 mm (2.50 in) for core sample and routine laboratory analyses. DDH depth penetration was to 500 m (1,500 ft), utilizing traditional mud-lubricated drilling methods. Casing utilized was 12.7 cm (5 in) and was utilized generally 3 – 6 m (10-20 ft) for collar stability, however in some cases hole stabilization required up to 10 m (30 ft) of casing. Occasionally overburden was tri-cone drilled; no core was recovered from these cased intervals. All recovered drill core was generally completed using a 3.05 m (10 ft) core barrel. A split-tube inner-sleeve was used and core was pressure removed when possible (in fractured ground) otherwise handled traditionally with rubber
89
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
mallet percussion to remove. Core was place in standard wax-coated boxes. Depth, rod change, and loss zones were noted on wood blocks in place with the drill core. Core was shipped to a GRCN locked storage in Mina, Nevada twice daily at drilling shift change. After drilling holes were surveyed with the Gyro-Reflex tool (described in next section). The drilling contractor conducted all operations to industry standard practices.
7.2.2 RC Drilling
In June 2021, GRCN commenced RC drilling at Golden Mile for Mineral Resource estimation. In general, RC drilling equipment typically consists of track drills capable of drilling angled holes to 500 m (1,500 ft). The drill is equipped with an air compressor capable of delivering sufficient free air at high enough pressure for drilling with a dual-tube drill pipe. The setup is usually complete with cyclone assembly with discharge through a rotary wet splitter. Drill bit size is 13.3 cm (5.25 in). The drill pipe was 10.2 cm (4 in) diameter in 3.04m (10 ft) lengths. The method employed utilized the double wall drill pipe, interchange hammer, and hammer bits to drill and sample the geologic formations. The samples were recovered through the center of the double walled pipe and the sample discharged via a cyclone. Water/fluid was injected into the airflow on an intermitted to continuous basis to assist with recovery of the sample through the wet rotating splitter. Appropriate sample bags are provided by company geologists and collected, bagged and tagged under geologist supervision during the drilling. The contractor conducted all operations to industry standard practices.
All holes labeled and capped so they can be readily identified in the field.
7.3 | Downhole Surveying |
Core and RC holes drilled by GRCN in 2020-2021 were surveyed by the drillers upon completion of each hole using a Reflex EZ-GYRO tool. Downhole surveys were taken at approximately 15 m (50 ft) intervals as per industry standard. The data was reviewed by a competent geologist and approved for entry into the company database. The holes tended to deviate <1 to 1.9 degrees deviation on the dip and up to 7.02 degrees deviation on azimuth. The database contains down-hole survey data for the 14 core and 42 RC holes completed by GRCN.
7.4 | GRCN Drilling Results |
In late 2020 and through August 2021, GRCN completed 14 diamond core drill holes totaling of 1,719.7 m (5,642 ft) and 42 RC drill holes totaling 4,870.7 m (15,980 ft) at the Golden Mile property (Table 7.1). Most of this drilling was directed towards the Main Zone located on the patented mineral claims (Fig. 7.3). Either half or quarter core from the 14 diamond drill holes completed by GRCN, and chip trays for the 42 RC drill holes, are available for examination.
90
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
TABLE 7.1 Summary of GRCN Drilling Completed at the Golden Mile Property
Company | Year | No. of | Type | Total | Total | Results |
GRCN | 2020-2021 | 14 | Core | 5,642 | 1,719.7 | Main Zone confirmation |
42 | RC | 15,980 | 4,870.7 | |||
Total | | 56 | | 21,622 | 6,590.4 | |
Figure 7.3 Location Map for Diamond Core (including Met) and RC Holes Drilled by GRCN at the Main Zone of the Golden Mile Property (patented claims shown shaded light blue and outlined in red)
7.4.1 Core Drilling Results
In November 2020, GRCN commenced a core drilling program to confirm historic drill assays and geological data collected by previous explorers, conduct geological and resource modeling and to collect representative mineralized ore grade samples in the Main Zone area in sufficient quantity to conduct metallurgical testing.
91
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Significant results from GRCN’s core drilling included up to 3.60 g/t Au (0.11 opst Au) over 20.1 m (66 ft) including 13.00 g/t Au (0.38 opst Au) over 3.0 m (10 ft) in Hole GMDD-002 and 2.77 g/t Au (0.08 opst Au) over 21.21 m (70 ft) including 8.96 g/t Au (0.26 opst Au) over 4.45 m (15 ft) in Hole GMDD-012. Significant results of the GRCN core drilling program are summarized in Table 7.2. All of the information gained has been included in the resource estimate.
Table 7.2 Significant Results for GRCN 2020-2021 Core Drilling at Golden Mile
Hole # | Angle |
| From | To | Interval | Au |
deg |
| m | m | m | g/t | |
GMDD-002 | -60 |
| 0.61 | 20.7 | 20.10 | 3.60 |
incl. | 8.50 | 10.1 | 1.52 | 17.45 | ||
incl. | 13.1 | 16.2 | 3.05 | 13.00 | ||
| 37.5 | 46.6 | 9.14 | 3.99 | ||
incl. | 37.5 | 43.4 | 5.90 | 5.89 | ||
| 51.2 | 52.7 | 1.52 | 2.70 | ||
| 64.9 | 66.4 | 1.52 | 0.89 | ||
| 72.5 | 75.6 | 3.05 | 0.42 | ||
GMDD-003 | -45 |
| 0.61 | 5.2 | 4.57 | 1.24 |
incl. | 0.61 | 3.66 | 3.05 | 1.62 | ||
| 70.71 | 76.81 | 6.10 | 0.56 | ||
incl. | 75.29 | 76.81 | 1.52 | 1.07 | ||
| 85.95 | 87.48 | 1.52 | 0.50 | ||
| 102.72 | 104.24 | 1.52 | 0.51 | ||
| 107.29 | 108.81 | 1.52 | 0.39 | ||
| 121.01 | 139.29 | 18.29 | 1.03 | ||
incl. | 128.63 | 133.20 | 4.57 | 2.81 | ||
| 143.87 | 146.91 | 3.05 | 0.74 | ||
incl. | 143.87 | 145.39 | 1.52 | 1.18 | ||
GMDD-004 | -50 |
| 5.18 | 18.90 | 13.72 | 0.45 |
28.04 | 29.57 | 1.52 | 2.96 | |||
| 38.71 | 40.23 | 1.52 | 0.71 | ||
| 46.33 | 47.85 | 1.52 | 3.81 | ||
| 53.95 | 55.47 | 1.52 | 0.40 | ||
| 61.57 | 66.14 | 4.57 | 3.10 | ||
incl. | 64.62 | 66.14 | 1.52 | 8.66 | ||
| 72.74 | 73.76 | 1.52 | 0.56 | ||
| 89.00 | 90.53 | 1.52 | 0.69 | ||
| 98.15 | 107.29 | 9.14 | 1.28 | ||
incl. | 102.72 | 104.24 | 1.52 | 4.89 | ||
| 151.49 | 153.01 | 1.52 | 1.07 | ||
GMDD-005 | -45 | | 49.38 | 53.95 | 4.57 | 0.36 |
64.62 | 78.33 | 13.72 | 1.68 | |||
incl. | 70.71 | 72.24 | 1.52 | 2.47 | ||
incl. | 76.81 | 78.33 | 1.52 | 6.42 | ||
| 81.38 | 89.00 | 7.62 | 0.45 | ||
| 101.19 | 111.86 | 10.67 | 1.61 | ||
incl. | 110.34 | 111.86 | 1.52 | 10.00 | ||
| 122.53 | 124.05 | 1.52 | 0.45 | ||
GMDD-006 | -50 |
| 58.83 | 67.97 | 9.14 | 1.17 |
incl. | 60.35 | 63.40 | 3.05 | 2.45 | ||
| 75.59 | 83.21 | 7.62 | 0.77 | ||
incl. | 80.16 | 83.21 | 3.05 | 1.42 | ||
106.07 | 107.59 | 1.52 | 0.62 | |||
| 150.27 | 151.79 | 1.52 | 0.45 | ||
GMDD-007 | -45 | | 12.19 | 22.25 | 10.06 | 1.73 |
incl. | 13.72 | 15.24 | 1.52 | 2.15 | ||
incl. | 16.76 | 19.81 | 3.05 | 3.76 | ||
| 96.01 | 97.54 | 1.52 | 0.40 | ||
| 112.78 | 114.30 | 1.52 | 0.68 |
92
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| | | 118.87 | 121.92 | 3.05 | 1.17 |
incl. | 118.87 | 120.40 | 1.52 | 2.05 | ||
| 134.11 | 135.64 | 1.52 | 0.75 | ||
GMDD-008 | -50 | 37.19 | 38.71 | 1.52 | 0.53 | |
| 69.19 | 70.71 | 1.52 | 0.98 | ||
GMDD-009 | -90 | | 1.43 | 10.06 | 8.63 | 0.45 |
incl. | 8.53 | 10.06 | 1.52 | 1.73 | ||
| 20.73 | 22.25 | 1.52 | 1.94 | ||
| 35.97 | 37.49 | 1.52 | 0.99 | ||
| 42.06 | 43.59 | 1.52 | 2.32 | ||
| 141.12 | 142.65 | 1.52 | 0.37 | ||
GMDD-010 | -90 | | 0.00 | 6.46 | 6.46 | 0.65 |
incl. | 3.05 | 4.57 | 1.52 | 1.95 | ||
| 11.25 | 17.28 | 6.04 | 1.60 | ||
incl. | 14.02 | 17.28 | 3.26 | 2.77 | ||
| 24.38 | 35.05 | 10.67 | 1.88 | ||
incl. | 28.96 | 35.05 | 6.10 | 3.21 | ||
| 43.46 | 49.13 | 5.67 | 0.74 | ||
incl. | 43.46 | 44.81 | 1.34 | 2.62 | ||
| 59.44 | 63.76 | 4.33 | 1.05 | ||
incl. | 60.96 | 62.48 | 1.52 | 1.85 | ||
| 81.38 | 90.53 | 9.14 | 2.82 | ||
incl. | 81.38 | 82.91 | 1.52 | 1.19 | ||
incl. | 87.48 | 90.53 | 3.05 | 7.71 | ||
GMDD-011 | -90 |
| 91.44 | 96.01 | 4.57 | 0.67 |
incl. | 91.44 | 92.96 | 1.52 | 1.12 | ||
GMDD-012 | -90 | | 8.78 | 9.30 | 0.52 | 15.80 |
| 19.32 | 40.54 | 21.21 | 2.77 | ||
incl. | 19.32 | 23.77 | 4.45 | 8.96 | ||
incl. | 34.44 | 35.97 | 1.52 | 4.16 | ||
| 82.60 | 84.12 | 1.52 | 0.41 | ||
| 100.89 | 106.98 | 6.10 | 0.42 | ||
GMDD-013 | -90 | | 8.17 | 16.15 | 7.99 | 2.11 |
incl. | 10.06 | 11.58 | 1.52 | 4.63 | ||
| 22.25 | 23.77 | 1.52 | 8.77 | ||
GMDD-014 | -45 | | 26.82 | 36.03 | 9.20 | 1.40 |
incl. | 29.87 | 31.39 | 1.52 | 3.88 | ||
| 39.01 | 42.06 | 3.05 | 2.43 | ||
incl. | 39.01 | 40.54 | 1.52 | 3.95 | ||
| 93.88 | 97.84 | 3.96 | 0.72 | ||
incl. | 96.93 | 97.84 | 0.91 | 2.50 | ||
| 124.36 | 127.41 | 3.05 | 1.61 | ||
incl. | 125.88 | 127.41 | 1.52 | 2.53 |
7.4.2 RC Drilling Results
From late June through August 2021, GRCN completed a RC drilling program for geological and resource modeling of the Main Zone area at Golden Mile. The goals of this program were to add to the known mineralization by testing the undrilled areas between gold-bearing intercepts returned from historic holes and for the estimation of Mineral Resources reported herein. Significant intercepts included 6.10 m of 5.93 g/t Au (0.173 opst) and 16.76 m of 3.31 g/t Au (0.097 opst) including 1.52 m of 27.50 g/t Au (0.803 opst) in Hole GMRC-026. Another notable intercept included 24.38 m of 1.69 g/t Au (0.049 opst) including 3.05 m of 5.92 g/t Au (0.173 opst) in Hole GMRC-013.
93
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Significant results of the GRCN RC drilling program are summarized in Table 7.3. All of the information gained has also been included in the resource estimate.
Table 7.3 Significant Results for GRCN 2021 RC Drilling at Golden Mile
Hole # | Angle |
| From | To | Interval | Au | Hole # | Angle |
| From | To | Interval | Au |
deg |
| m | m | m | g/t | deg |
| m | m | m | g/t | ||
GMRC-001 | -45 |
| 77.72 | 80.77 | 3.05 | 0.399 | GMRC-025 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 0.889 |
| 117.35 | 118.87 | 1.52 | 0.364 | incl. | 0.00 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 1.098 | ||||
| 123.44 | 126.49 | 3.05 | 0.434 |
| 22.86 | 24.38 | 1.52 | 0.357 | ||||
GMRC-003 | -45 |
| 15.24 | 33.53 | 18.29 | 0.848 |
| 41.15 | 42.67 | 1.52 | 0.469 | ||
incl. | 22.86 | 24.38 | 1.52 | 1.830 |
| 56.39 | 57.91 | 1.52 | 1.170 | ||||
incl. | 27.43 | 30.48 | 3.05 | 1.720 |
| 67.06 | 91.44 | 24.38 | 1.040 | ||||
incl. | 32.00 | 33.53 | 1.52 | 1.310 | incl. | 68.58 | 73.15 | 4.57 | 2.007 | ||||
GMRC-004 | -45 |
| 27.43 | 33.53 | 6.10 | 0.320 | incl. | 77.72 | 79.25 | 1.52 | 5.760 | ||
| 51.82 | 56.39 | 4.57 | 0.337 | incl. | 82.30 | 83.82 | 1.52 | 1.345 | ||||
GMRC-005 | -45 |
| 70.10 | 76.20 | 6.10 | 0.438 |
| 99.06 | 103.63 | 4.57 | 0.696 | ||
GMRC-006 | -45 |
| 3.05 | 22.86 | 19.81 | 0.931 | incl. | 102.11 | 103.63 | 1.52 | 1.730 | ||
incl. | 3.05 | 6.10 | 3.05 | 3.545 | GMRC-026 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 6.10 | 6.10 | 5.929 | ||
incl. | 19.81 | 21.34 | 1.52 | 1.095 | incl. | 0.00 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 22.800 | ||||
GMRC-007 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 12.19 | 12.19 | 0.423 |
| 18.29 | 22.86 | 4.57 | 0.565 | ||
| 16.76 | 25.91 | 9.14 | 0.871 |
| 33.53 | 38.10 | 4.57 | 0.882 | ||||
incl. | 19.81 | 22.86 | 3.05 | 1.853 | incl. | 36.58 | 38.10 | 1.52 | 1.885 | ||||
GMRC-008 | -45 |
| 7.62 | 12.19 | 4.57 | 0.529 |
| 50.29 | 51.82 | 1.52 | 0.770 | ||
| 19.81 | 21.34 | 1.52 | 0.547 |
| 56.39 | 73.15 | 16.76 | 3.305 | ||||
| 32.00 | 39.62 | 7.62 | 0.390 | incl. | 62.48 | 64.01 | 1.52 | 27.500 | ||||
GMRC-010 | -45 |
| 83.82 | 85.34 | 1.52 | 0.370 |
| 77.72 | 80.77 | 3.05 | 0.522 | ||
GMRC-011 | -45 |
| 15.24 | 18.29 | 3.05 | 0.300 |
| 106.68 | 120.40 | 13.72 | 0.345 | ||
| 22.86 | 25.91 | 3.05 | 0.315 |
| 131.06 | 134.11 | 3.05 | 0.308 | ||||
| 33.53 | 39.62 | 6.10 | 0.387 | GMRC-027 | -45 |
| 10.67 | 25.91 | 15.24 | 1.904 | ||
GMRC-012 | -45 |
| 15.24 | 22.86 | 7.62 | 0.599 | incl. | 10.67 | 15.24 | 4.57 | 5.423 | ||
incl. | 21.34 | 22.86 | 1.52 | 1.620 |
| 47.24 | 48.77 | 1.52 | 0.466 | ||||
| 45.72 | 50.29 | 4.57 | 0.682 |
| 53.34 | 54.86 | 1.52 | 0.745 | ||||
incl. | 45.72 | 47.24 | 1.52 | 1.010 |
| 59.44 | 60.96 | 1.52 | 2.390 | ||||
GMRC-013 | -45 |
| 10.67 | 12.19 | 1.52 | 0.489 |
| 65.53 | 67.06 | 1.52 | 0.506 | ||
| 18.29 | 19.81 | 1.52 | 0.402 |
| 70.10 | 83.82 | 13.72 | 0.766 | ||||
| 30.48 | 54.86 | 24.38 | 1.694 | incl. | 70.10 | 71.63 | 1.52 | 1.960 | ||||
incl. | 32.00 | 35.05 | 3.05 | 5.920 | incl. | 77.72 | 79.25 | 1.52 | 1.430 | ||||
incl. | 44.20 | 47.24 | 3.05 | 2.225 | incl. | 82.30 | 83.82 | 1.52 | 2.030 | ||||
incl. | 48.77 | 50.29 | 1.52 | 3.540 |
| 94.49 | 103.63 | 9.14 | 0.398 | ||||
| 67.06 | 86.87 | 19.81 | 0.792 |
| 109.73 | 111.25 | 1.52 | 0.421 | ||||
incl. | 70.10 | 71.63 | 1.52 | 3.270 |
| 114.30 | 115.82 | 1.52 | 0.404 | ||||
incl. | 82.30 | 85.34 | 3.05 | 1.813 |
| 144.78 | 152.40 | 7.62 | 0.823 | ||||
| 106.68 | 109.73 | 3.05 | 0.308 | incl. | 144.78 | 146.30 | 1.52 | 3.160 | ||||
| 120.40 | 121.92 | 1.52 | 0.749 | GMRC-028 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 7.62 | 7.62 | 0.928 | ||
GMRC-014 | -90 |
| 51.82 | 54.86 | 3.05 | 0.631 | incl. | 0.00 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 2.140 | ||
incl. | 53.34 | 54.86 | 1.52 | 1.090 |
| 48.77 | 53.34 | 4.57 | 0.512 | ||||
| 59.44 | 60.96 | 1.52 | 0.524 | incl. | 51.82 | 53.34 | 1.52 | 1.110 | ||||
| 152.40 | 153.92 | 1.52 | 0.622 |
| 82.30 | 111.25 | 28.96 | 0.427 | ||||
GMRC-015 | -45 |
| 103.63 | 109.73 | 6.10 | 0.726 | incl. | 82.30 | 83.82 | 1.52 | 1.050 | ||
incl. | 106.68 | 108.20 | 1.52 | 1.125 | incl. | 108.20 | 109.73 | 1.52 | 1.565 | ||||
GMRC-019 | -45 |
| 42.67 | 44.20 | 1.52 | 0.397 |
| 121.92 | 124.97 | 3.05 | 0.340 | ||
| 60.96 | 70.10 | 9.14 | 1.427 |
| 134.11 | 141.73 | 7.62 | 1.087 | ||||
incl. | 60.96 | 64.01 | 3.05 | 3.575 | incl. | 134.11 | 137.16 | 3.05 | 2.175 | ||||
| 80.77 | 82.30 | 1.52 | 0.408 |
| 150.88 | 152.40 | 1.52 | 0.580 |
94
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| 96.01 | 97.54 | 1.52 | 0.970 | GMRC-029 | -45 |
| 1.52 | 7.62 | 6.10 | 0.762 | ||
| 170.69 | 172.21 | 1.52 | 0.385 | incl. | 6.10 | 7.62 | 1.52 | 2.670 | ||||
GMRC-020 | -45 |
| 44.20 | 50.29 | 6.10 | 0.519 |
| 33.53 | 89.92 | 56.39 | 0.803 | ||
incl. | 44.20 | 45.72 | 1.52 | 1.310 | incl. | 33.53 | 35.05 | 1.52 | 2.430 | ||||
| 68.58 | 70.10 | 1.52 | 0.468 | incl. | 53.34 | 62.48 | 9.14 | 1.942 | ||||
| 94.49 | 102.11 | 7.62 | 0.566 | incl. | 71.63 | 74.68 | 3.05 | 2.228 | ||||
incl. | 97.54 | 99.06 | 1.52 | 2.130 |
| 99.06 | 100.58 | 1.52 | 0.548 | ||||
| 108.20 | 114.30 | 6.10 | 0.325 |
| 105.16 | 108.20 | 3.05 | 0.327 | ||||
| 121.92 | 132.59 | 10.67 | 0.303 |
| 129.54 | 140.21 | 10.67 | 1.516 | ||||
GMRC-021 | -90 |
| 68.58 | 70.10 | 1.52 | 1.615 | incl. | 131.06 | 132.59 | 1.52 | 7.920 | ||
GMRC-022 | -45 |
| 71.63 | 73.15 | 1.52 | 0.379 | GMRC-030 | -45 |
| 62.48 | 64.01 | 1.52 | 0.352 |
GMRC-023 | -45 |
| 4.57 | 27.43 | 22.86 | 1.634 |
| 80.77 | 83.82 | 3.05 | 0.321 | ||
incl. | 4.57 | 7.62 | 3.05 | 6.985 |
| 89.92 | 91.44 | 1.52 | 0.546 | ||||
incl. | 15.24 | 16.76 | 1.52 | 5.990 | GMRC-031 | -45 |
| 36.58 | 39.62 | 3.05 | 0.675 | ||
| 30.48 | 32.00 | 1.52 | 2.190 |
| 51.82 | 62.48 | 10.67 | 0.904 | ||||
| 41.15 | 44.20 | 3.05 | 0.469 | incl. | 51.82 | 56.39 | 4.57 | 1.199 | ||||
| 47.24 | 56.39 | 9.14 | 1.944 |
| 73.15 | 91.44 | 18.29 | 0.514 | ||||
incl. | 47.24 | 50.29 | 3.05 | 5.125 | incl. | 82.30 | 83.82 | 1.52 | 1.185 | ||||
| 71.63 | 73.15 | 1.52 | 0.451 | GMRC-033 | -45 |
| 77.72 | 79.25 | 1.52 | 0.818 | ||
| 76.20 | 79.25 | 3.05 | 0.353 |
| 88.39 | 94.49 | 6.10 | 0.372 | ||||
| 83.82 | 91.44 | 7.62 | 0.340 | GMRC-034 | -45 |
| 50.29 | 54.86 | 4.57 | 0.348 | ||
| 102.11 | 118.87 | 16.76 | 0.514 | GMRC-035 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 12.19 | 12.19 | 0.535 | ||
incl. | 111.25 | 112.78 | 1.52 | 2.150 |
| 59.44 | 64.01 | 4.57 | 0.314 | ||||
| 129.54 | 135.64 | 6.10 | 0.484 |
| 73.15 | 77.72 | 4.57 | 0.314 | ||||
GMRC-024 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 0.950 |
| 88.39 | 92.96 | 4.57 | 0.474 | ||
incl. | 0.00 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.220 | GMRC-037 | -45 |
| 27.43 | 32.00 | 4.57 | 0.578 | ||
| 16.76 | 21.34 | 4.57 | 2.939 | incl. | 27.43 | 28.96 | 1.52 | 1.120 | ||||
incl. | 16.76 | 18.29 | 1.52 | 7.470 |
| 38.10 | 39.62 | 1.52 | 0.397 | ||||
| 62.48 | 67.06 | 4.57 | 0.756 |
| 74.68 | 76.20 | 1.52 | 0.389 | ||||
incl. | 65.53 | 67.06 | 1.52 | 1.590 |
| 91.44 | 92.96 | 1.52 | 0.518 | ||||
| 89.92 | 91.44 | 1.52 | 0.456 | GMRC-038 | -45 |
| 28.96 | 30.48 | 1.52 | 0.459 | ||
| 53.34 | 54.86 | 1.52 | 0.415 | |||||||||
GMRC-039 | -45 |
| 62.48 | 64.01 | 1.52 | 1.465 | |||||||
| 77.72 | 80.77 | 3.05 | 0.318 | |||||||||
GMRC-043 | -45 |
| 0.00 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 0.333 | |||||||
| 44.20 | 47.24 | 3.05 | 0.496 | |||||||||
| 60.96 | 73.15 | 12.19 | 0.445 | |||||||||
incl. | 68.58 | 70.10 | 1.52 | 1.250 | |||||||||
| 80.77 | 85.34 | 4.57 | 0.639 | |||||||||
incl. | 83.82 | 85.34 | 1.52 | 1.095 |
7.5 | Interpretation |
The drill data were incorporated into the property database to complete a S-K 1300 compliant Mineral Resource estimate for this Initial Assessment. This included an industry standard QA/QC program, down-hole surveys were conducted on all holes. Care was also taken during drilling and the removal of core from the core barrel in order to maximize sample recoveries, and further specific gravity determinations were obtained from samples of the drill core.
The 2020-2021 GRCN drill information allowed for the refinement in the modeling of the high-grade portions of the Golden Mile Main Zone deposit, as well as the oxidized/unoxidized boundary, and the
95
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
contact between Mesozoic sedimentary, Tertiary volcanic and granitic rocks. These refinements are critical to the confidence in the resource estimation at Golden Mile Main Zone. Down-hole surveys conducted on the 2020-2021 holes indicated only minor deviations, which alleviated concerns related to the lack of down-hole survey data in previous holes. The confirmatory drilling ultimately led to the definition of Mineral Resources within the Golden Mile Main Zone deposit. The deposit’s mineralization remains open on strike and at depth.
96
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
8 | SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY |
8.1 | Historic Procedures |
Sample preparation, analyses and security procedures for historic exploration programs at Golden Mile were poorly documented. Only reports by Ristorcelli (2006) and Roscan (2011) provided any descriptions of procedures implemented. Kinross did not provide any documentation of procedures to the underlying owners during the time of their lease.
8.1.1 Cordex 2006
The 28 holes completed by Cordex in 2006 were drilled by an RC rig with injection of water as required by MSHA. Drill cuttings were circulated through a cyclone sampler. Equipment used is standard equipment employed by the exploration drilling business.
All chip material was recovered and collected. A 1.8 kg to 3.6 kg (4 to 8 lb) sample was split from the total sample using a rotating sample splitter, necessary for wet drilling. The reject sample was stored in the field. The assay sample interval is 1.52 m (5 ft) in drill holes cutting pre-Tertiary rocks. A 1.52 m (5 ft) assay sample of drill chips was collected every 6.1 to 9.2m (20 ft. to 30 f) in the unmineralized volcanic cover rock.
Drill assay samples collected for the Cordex RC holes in 2006 were transported to American Assay Laboratories Inc. (AAL) in Sparks, Nevada. AAL is a well-established and reputable laboratory participates in the following accreditations:
● | Certificate of ISO/IEC 17025 |
● | Certificate of Laboratory Proficiency PTP-MAL, accredited by the Standards Council of Canada |
● | Geostats of Australia certificate |
● | Society of Mineral Analysis-Round Robin Testing |
Assay samples as received were dried and crushed to 70% minus 10 mesh (0.90 mm). A split of about 400 g was taken and finely pulverized to 70% minus 150 mesh (0.07mm). A 30-g split of the pulverized material was assayed for gold using a fire assay with an atomic adsorption finish. Each sample interval was also analyzed for 30 elements by ICP using an aqua regia digestion of a 0.5-g split of the sample. American Assay inserted blanks and standards, and randomly re-assayed about 10% of the samples. Cordex did not insert standard samples or blanks into the sample stream before submitting samples to the assay lab. In addition, no repeat assays were done using a second assay laboratory.
Cordex selected groups of samples, usually those with initial assays greater than 300 ppb, for re-assay. For drill holes Ml-1 through Ml-15 (first phase of drilling} some re-assays were done on the original pulp sample. Some of the new assays were done on new samples processed from the rejects stored in the field,
97
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
and essentially all repeat assays designated by Cordex from the second phase of drilling (Ml-16 through Ml-28) were new samples prepared from reject cuttings stored in the field. Cordex reported both the original and repeat assays in their data file, and also calculated and posted an average of the two assays.
Cordex engaged Mine Development Associates (MDA), a consulting group, to carry out a statistical analysis of the analytical database and provide recommendations on the sampling protocol (Ristorcelli, 2006). MDA noted that for all samples greater than 300 ppb Au, the relative difference in assay values is 94%, with most differences occurring in values above 1 g/t (0.029 opst) Au. MDA suggested that the high error most likely may be caused by the presence of relatively coarse gold or gold occurring in clots or irregularly distributed in the mineralized rock. Other possible sources of error are introduced by the nature of RC drilling which is noted for introducing downhole contamination and using wet sampling that can introduce bias by losing fine material from the sample.
8.1.2 Roscan 2011
Roscan (2011) completed a core drilling program designed to determine which structures host the gold at Golden Mile. Core was logged, sample intervals marked, core boxes taped closed and palletized for pick up by AAL. After the core was transported, it was cut with a diamond bladed saw by AAL personnel. The core was then dried, crushed to -10 mesh, split to 250 g and the split was pulverized to -150 mesh. A 30-g charge was analyzed by fire assay with an IC (1 ppb detection limit). Samples containing >3 g/t (0.088 opst) Au were re-analyzed by fire assay with a gravimetric finish. Multi-element ICP analysis for major and trace elements was completed on all samples submitted to AAL.
8.2 | GRCN Procedures |
8.2.1 Security Measures
Sample security procedures for GRCN sample materials were established according to industry standards and included (from generation of sample at the site) secured sample transport to a local locked storage facility for holding and/or directly shipped via secured transport to the laboratory for analysis. Diamond drill samples were loaded into sacks, ziptied and shipped to lab via GRCN personnel. RC samples were shipped by cargo truck in lots loaded into bins with top closures, enclosed trailer, or stacked and covered and secured to the bed of a transport truck (in the case of whole DDH drill hole boxes). Chain of custody forms accompanied the shipments to the reception at the assigned laboratory. No breaches of the security were reported.
98
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
8.2.2 Sample Preparation and Analysis
For the GRCN 2020-2021 core drilling and 2021 RC drilling programs, continuous sampling was assigned to on 1.52 m (5 ft) intervals, contingent on drilling recovery conditions and geologic factors. Core assay samples were mainly processed at ALS in Reno, with additional work carried out at ALS in Vancouver, BC, Canada, Elko NV, Tuscon AZ, Sonora Mexico, Chihuahua Mexico and Lima Peru. ALS is an accredited ISO/IEC 17025 facility. Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratories (Bureau Veritas), also an accredited ISO/IEC 17025 facility, assayed samples for the four GRCN metallurgical core holes and was also the umpire laboratory used for check assaying of samples sent to ALS. For the GRCN 2021 RC drilling program, all assay samples were processed at ALS.
All assay samples were analyzed using a 30 g FA with an AAS finish for gold (ALS code AU-AA23; Bureau Veritas code FA430)). This technique has a lower detection limit of 0.005 ppm and an upper detection limit of 10.00 ppm. Samples with greater than 10.00 ppm Au were re-analyzed using a 30 g FA with a gravimetric finish (ALS code Au-GRA21; Bureau Veritas code FA530). All assay samples were also analyzed using a 0.5 g sample with aqua regia for silver (ALS code Ag-AA45; Bureau Veritas code AQ-400). This technique has a lower detection limit of 0.1 ppm for Ag and an upper detection limit of 200 ppm for Ag.
GRCN has no business relationship with either ALS or Bureau Veritas, beyond being a customer for analytical services.
8.2.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
The 2020-2021 GRCN drilling programs consisted of 14 core and 43 RC drill holes. All Standard Reference Materials (SRM) used for the QA/QC program were obtained from Shea Clark Smith / MEG, Inc., Reno, Nevada (Table 8.1). Blank material was sourced as “Lava Rock” (pumice) from Oxborrow Landscaping, Sparks, Nevada.
Table 8.1 GRCN 2020-2021 Standard Reference Material (SRM)
Standard | Au ppm | SD |
MEG-AU.17.08 | 0.41 | 0.014 |
MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.663 | 0.046 |
MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.1 | 0.062 |
The variation from the SRM mean value defines the QA/QC variance and is used to determine acceptability of the standard sample assay. Approximately 60 g of sample material was submitted per QA/QC sample. For the 2020-2021 drilling programs, the criteria for failure were as follows.
1. | Assay result outside three times the SRM standard deviation: Warning |
2. | Assay result outside five times the SRM standard deviation: Failure |
3. | Blank value greater than 5 times the lower detection limit: Failure |
99
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
For the core drill holes, 69 SRM standards and 68 blanks were inserted with the 1,428 samples collected (Tables 8.2 & 8.3). For the RC drilling program, a total of 184 SRM standards and 190 blanks were inserted with the 3,234 samples collected.
Table 8.2 GRCN 2020-2021 QA/QC SRM Results for DDH Drill Holes
Sample No. | Drill Hole No. | SRM Standard | Au ppm | SRM ppm | 95% Cl |
855720 | GMDD-002 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.429 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854640 | GMDD-002 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.425 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854620 | GMDD-002 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.423 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854560 | GMDD-003 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.415 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854580 | GMDD-003 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.413 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854600 | GMDD-003 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854780 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.428 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854840 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.425 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854800 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.422 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
855320 | GMDD-005 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.409 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854900 | GMDD-006 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.409 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854960 | GMDD-006 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.422 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854940 | GMDD-006 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.424 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854380 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.386 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854440 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.408 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854460 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
855500 | GMDD-009 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.432 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
855480 | GMDD-009 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.416 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
3080300 | GMDD-010 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.369 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
3107660 | GMDD-010 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.402 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
3080260 | GMDD-011 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.378 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
3080280 | GMDD-011 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.385 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
3080420 | GMDD-013 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.344 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
3080480 | GMDD-013 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.387 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
855780 | GMDD-014 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.4 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
855760 | GMDD-014 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.395 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
855700 | GMDD-014 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.418 | 0.41 | 0.381 – 0.439 |
854700 | GMDD-002 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.13 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854680 | GMDD-002 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.08 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854660 | GMDD-002 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.13 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854500 | GMDD-003 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.03 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854540 | GMDD-003 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.145 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854520 | GMDD-003 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.07 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855740 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.135 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854860 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.15 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854760 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.09 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855340 | GMDD-005 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.13 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855280 | GMDD-005 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.115 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855260 | GMDD-005 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.06 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855000 | GMDD-005 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.16 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854920 | GMDD-006 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.15 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854880 | GMDD-006 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.03 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854480 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.03 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
100
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
854420 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.13 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855420 | GMDD-008 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.17 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855520 | GMDD-009 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.15 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3080340 | GMDD-010 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.144 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3080320 | GMDD-010 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.059 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3107640 | GMDD-010 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.031 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3107600 | GMDD-011 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.155 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3107620 | GMDD-011 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.165 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3080360 | GMDD-012 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.104 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3080380 | GMDD-012 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.125 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3107580 | GMDD-012 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.068 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3107560 | GMDD-012 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3080400 | GMDD-013 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 0.977 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
3080460 | GMDD-013 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.005 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855620 | GMDD-014 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.055 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
855660 | GMDD-014 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 1.03 | 1.1 | 0.983 – 1.231 |
854360 | GMDD-001 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.677 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
854820 | GMDD-004 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.706 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
855300 | GMDD-005 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.737 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
854400 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.717 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
855400 | GMDD-008 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.632 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
855380 | GMDD-008 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.664 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
855460 | GMDD-009 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.708 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
855540 | GMDD-009 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.703 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
3080440 | GMDD-013 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.628 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
855640 | GMDD-014 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.652 | 0.663 | 0.570 – 0.756 |
Table 8.3 GRCN 2020-2021 QA/QC Blanks Results for DDH Drill Holes
Sample No. | Drill Hole No. | BRM | Au ppm | Blank ppm | Failure ppm |
854361 | GMDD-001 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854681 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.119 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854661 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
855701 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
855721 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854641 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854621 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854541 | GMDD-003 | Lava Blank | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854601 | GMDD-003 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854561 | GMDD-003 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854521 | GMDD-003 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854501 | GMDD-003 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854581 | GMDD-003 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854821 | GMDD-004 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854761 | GMDD-004 | Lava Blank | 0.009 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854841 | GMDD-004 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854861 | GMDD-004 | Lava Blank | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
855741 | GMDD-004 | Lava Blank | 0.013 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
854781 | GMDD-004 | Lava Blank | 0.0025 | 0.003 | 0.015 |
101
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
102
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
For the 69 core SRM samples submitted, a total of two warnings were returned and two failures (Table 8.4). Performance of the remaining assays was acceptable (Fig. 8.1). It was noted that three out of the four SRM warnings or failures were submitted to Inspectorate labs. For the 184 RC SRM standards submitted a total of eight failures were reported, the majority of which appear to be the result of recording the incorrect SRM (Fig. 8.2).
Table 8.4 2020-2021 SRM Failures
Sample No. | Drill Hole No. | SRM | Au ppm | Criteria |
3080300 | GMDD-010 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.369 | Warning |
3080260 | GMDD-011 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.378 | Warning |
854460 | GMDD-007 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.360 | Failure |
3080420 | GMDD-013 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.344 | Failure |
835020 | GMRC-035 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.454 | Failure |
311740 | GMRC-004 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.457 | Failure |
835200 | GMRC-038 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 0.561 | Failure |
314300 | GMRC-025 | MEG-Au.17.08 | 1.16 | Failure |
312700 | GMRC-026 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 0.416 | Failure |
835100 | GMRC-037 | MEG-Au.17.21 | 0.019 | Failure |
312440 | GMRC-018 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.515 | Failure |
314140 | GMRC-021 | MEG-Au.19.05 | 0.443 | Failure |
103
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 8.1 2020-2021 SRM Performance for DDH
104
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 8.2 2020-2021 SRM Performance for RC
For the blank material, a total of four failures each were reported for DDH and RC drill holes (Table 8.5; Fig. 8.3).
Table 8.5 2020-2021 Blank Material Failures
Sample No. | Drill Hole No. | BRM | Au ppm | Criteria |
854681 | GMDD-002 | Lava Blank | 0.119 | > 0.015 |
855641 | GMDD-014 | Lava Blank | 0.034 | > 0.015 |
3080261 | GMDD-011 | Lava Blank | 0.03 | > 0.015 |
3080461 | GMDD-013 | Lava Blank | 0.021 | > 0.015 |
835301 | GMRC-039 | Lava Blank | 0.086 | > 0.015 |
313321 | GMRC-006 | Lava Blank | 0.045 | > 0.015 |
312541 | GMRC-020 | Lava Blank | 0.031 | > 0.015 |
314541 | GMRC-029 | Lava Blank | 0.016 | > 0.015 |
105
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 8.3 2020-2021 Blank Material Performance
8.2.4 Check Assays
For the 2020-2021 core drilling campaign, a total of 241 field duplicates were taken and submitted for assay at the same laboratory as the primary sample. There is a strong correlation between the primary and secondary assays, with several outliers noted, possibly representing either a high nugget effect or gold occurring in clots or irregularly distributed in the mineralized rock (Figs. 8.4 & 8.5).
106
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 8.4 Au Field Duplicate Control Plot
Figure 8.5 Au Min Max Field Duplicate Control Plot
8.3 | Opinion on Adequacy |
GRCN considers that the 2020-2021 core and RC drilling programs meets industry standards and have been reviewed and confirmed in sufficient detail to permit inclusion of the information in the Golden Mile property database.
107
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
9 | DATA VERIFICATION |
9.1 | Historic Property Evaluation and Data Verification |
Upon acquisition of the Golden Mile property, GRCN conducted a thorough review of all available data. GRCN found that numerous errors existed in the database. These errors included hole locations, including the elimination of certain holes from the database, and entering of assays into the database. Other assay issues included switching back and forth from g/t (ppm) to opst in drill logs. Additionally, assays were compiled and averaged using duplicate assays. In some cases, the duplicate assays were neither entered nor compiled. In these cases, assay values changed significantly. Ray (2016) also noted that the locations of many historical drill holes were not well known and many drill hole collars had not been surveyed. GRCN has made a diligent effort to identify and correct any errors in the Golden Mile database.
Available information on historic property evaluations and data verifications are summarized below.
9.1.1 Teck
Surface rock chip samples, and grab samples from drill chips collected from the property during and after the Teck program, were analyzed by multi-element ICP techniques (O’Donnell, 2016). Analytical results suggested that the gold mineralizing system is accompanied by a trace element assemblage of elevated arsenic, antimony, bismuth and possibly manganese. In the Main Zone, elevated copper and silver values accompany the gold, but in other parts of the property (such as the stockwork zones) they do not. This is consistent with the presence of more than one style of skarn mineralization, but an alternative interpretation that more than one kind of gold mineralizing system is also possible. Teck also noted that aqua-regia digestion, such as has been used for the ICP analyses, provides only a partial leach for certain key pathfinder elements in gold skarn systems, including bismuth and tellurium.
Teck determined that elevated geochemical values form three northeasterly- trending clusters:
1. | west of the Main Zone |
2. | over the Main Zone and northeast extension |
3. | east of the Main Zone, on the ridge with silicified horizons |
9.1.2 Cordex
In 2006, Cordex collected 12 samples during their evaluation of the Golden Mile property (O'Donnell, 2006). These samples were intended to confirm the presence of metal in the system and to characterize styles of mineralization. Most samples were collected from areas that had been reported to be mineralized. Additional samples tested monzonite west of the Main Zone, and the ridge with silicified
108
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
breccia east of the Main Zone. Eight of the 12 samples collected returned results exceeding 500 ppb Au (Table 9.1). Assays ranged from 10 ppb Au to a maximum of 17,450 ppb Au (Sample# 415519). Samples were submitted to ALS Chemex (ALS) in Sparks, Nevada. ALS is certified under ISO 9002, and employs a comprehensive quality control program covering both sample preparation and analysis. Samples were analyzed for gold by FA/AA techniques on a 30 g aliquot, with a 5-ppb detection limit. Samples returning in excess of 10 g/t (0.292 opst) Au were re-assayed using fire assay techniques with a gravimetric finish (FA/GRAV). Samples were analyzed for other elements by 34-element ICP-AES (using aqua-regia partial digestion) and for mercury using cold vapor/AA techniques. Samples exceeding 10,000 ppm in copper, lead or zinc were re-analyzed for those elements using aqua regia/AA techniques. No standards were submitted by Cordex to the laboratory.
The results of surface rock sampling performed by Cordex correlated well with the results from previous work on the property and confirmed the presence of gold and copper mineralization of a tenor similar to that reported by previous workers in surface sampling on the property (O'Donnell, 2006).
Table 9.1 Cordex Significant Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au)
Sample | Au | Ag | As | Bi | Cu | Sb | Zn | Description |
415519 | 17,450 | 41.7 | 1,370 | 54 | 101,000 | 198 | 1,285 | mt skarn and fault on west wall main pit |
415515 | 13,550 | 2.9 | 127 | 46 | 579 | 16 | 117 | px-mt skarn, small pit |
415541 | 3,410 | 3.6 | 2,700 | 30 | 8,590 | 102 | 92 | mt skarn in main pit, sil network |
415517 | 2,660 | 11.8 | 9,780 | 42 | 18,200 | 128 | 120 | retrograde skarn(ep) malachite |
415518 | 2,440 | 7.9 | 819 | 19 | 13,000 | 57 | 261 | ss/sh, malachite seams |
415516 | 2,350 | 7.1 | 186 | 43 | 3,860 | 11 | 426 | mt-px skarn, adit dump |
415520 | 2,030 | 8.7 | 4,080 | 68 | 8,500 | 66 | 71 | Mt-skarn in main pit, sil-network |
415521 | 667 | 1.3 | 671 | 16 | 1,595 | 22 | 100 | silicified bx, feox boxworks |
9.1.3 Portage
In a 2009 NI 43-101 Technical Report, Portage reported that 3 verification samples were taken from old surface workings at the Golden Mile property (Suda, 2009). These samples were analyzed by ALS in Sparks, NV and assays ranged from 1.12 ppm to 9.99 ppm Au (Table 9.2).
Portage also checked pre-2006 data including drill chips mounted on canvas strip logs in the offices of Cordex in Reno. The chip logs were examined using a binocular microscope and checked against written log sheets. Cordex assay database was also checked against the official assay sheets prepared by American
109
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Assay Lab. Only very rarely were errors detected. Data transferred to the database were at least 99.8% accurately transcribed. The available material and assay data appear to be consistent with descriptions presented in the logs as well as with the geology and styles of mineralization reported on the property.
Geological mapping checked during a field examination showed the map had been accurately and correctly prepared (Suda, 2009). Most drill hole locations were also visited and examined in the field and found to be reclaimed and marked by a permanent survey marker.
Table 9.2 Portage Rock Chip Samples (>500 ppb Au)
Sample No. | Easting | Northing | Au | Ag | Cu | Zn | Description |
GMN-01 | 433 168 | 4 262 384 | 1.97 | 7.6 | 5,290 | 85 | 15' chip-channel sample, dozer cut just VV of Ml-3 Mt- garnet skarn, clay-carb-chlorite alt w/limonites |
GMN-02 | 433 183 | 4 262 380 | 9.99 | 8.6 | 1.70% | 191 | 1O' chip channel sample, W wall of pit gothite-stained retrograde skarn, ser-clay laced with limonite veinlets; intersection of NW and NE structures |
GMN-03 | 433 211 | 4 262 469 | 1.12 | 0.2 | 35 | 43 | 8' chip channel sample, dozer cut 20' S of hole M1-12 Granular clay-rich rock with limonites, retrograde skarn |
9.2 | GRCN Data Verification |
In early 2020, GRCN collected 11 rock chip samples from old surface workings as part of its due diligence prior to acquisition of the Golden Mile property.
9.2.1 GRCN Check Samples
Check samples were analyzed by Bureau Veritas, Sparks, NV and gold assays ranged from 0.211 ppm to 12.20 ppm Au (Table 9.3). The location of GRCN check samples are shown on Figure 9.1. The results of surface rock sampling confirmed results from previous work on the property and the presence of gold, silver and copper mineralization. Elevated levels of lead, zinc, arsenic and antimony were also returned for the check samples. In addition, iron content was quite high with four of the samples returning more than 40% iron indicating an association of gold mineralization with magnetite skarn, at least locally. Six of the GRCN check samples were also re-submitted to Bureau Veritas for cyanide bottle roll tests to
110
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
determine the amenability to cyanide leach gold recovery. The results of the bottle roll tests are described in Section 10.
Table 9.3 GRCN Rock Chip Check Samples
Sample | Au | Ag | Cu | Pb | Zn | As | Sb | Fe |
Number | ppm | ppm | ppm | ppm | ppm | ppm | ppm | % |
3082801 | 1.613 | 5.9 | 3,239.8 | 29.8 | 885 | 345.4 | 53.4 | >40.00 |
3082802 | 3.629 | 3.7 | 5,793.3 | 90.5 | 5,211 | 4,124.7 | 291.8 | >40.00 |
3082803 | 6.366 | 20.7 | >10,000.0 | 63.0 | 628 | 1,139.9 | 215.0 | 9.80 |
3082804 | 2.824 | 8.8 | 3,632.3 | 63.1 | 161 | 1,159.1 | 146.1 | 11.90 |
3082805 | 3.150 | 11.1 | 7,851.6 | 116.8 | 132 | 6,110.6 | 156.9 | >40.00 |
3082806 | 1.091 | 8.3 | >10,000.0 | 37.9 | 121 | 1,935.7 | 63.3 | 20.56 |
3082807 | 8.457 | 9.3 | 8,352.1 | 34.8 | 142 | 3,309.0 | 283.3 | >40.00 |
3082808 | 2.766 | 7.4 | 3,838.6 | 99.4 | 387 | 186.7 | 17.2 | 4.15 |
3082809 | 0.268 | 1.1 | 454.6 | 66.1 | 176 | 93.3 | 15.0 | 1.59 |
3082810 | 0.211 | 1.1 | 99.1 | 7.2 | 236 | 910.9 | 277.9 | 3.42 |
3082811 | 12.200 | 35.2 | 600.4 | 2,543.5 | 2,966 | >10,000.0 | 257.9 | 19.98 |
Figure 9.1 Location Map of GRCN Rock Chip Check Samples Collected from the Golden Mile Property
111
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
9.2.2 Drilling Database
In 2020-2021, GRCN determined that multiple operators had historically worked on the Golden Mile property. The historic drilling data available incorporated 142 drill holes as follows:
✓ | Battle Mt Exploration: 29 drillholes |
✓ | Cordex: 28 drillholes |
✓ | Elmwood JV: 18 drillholes |
✓ | Kinross: 36 drillholes |
✓ | Roscan: 5 drillholes |
✓ | Standard Slag: 7 drillholes |
✓ | Teck: 4 drillholes |
✓ | USMX: 15 drillholes |
Of these, the Kinross RC holes had both collar and downhole surveys. The remaining drill holes were limited to collar surveys only. Thirty-one drill holes had no associated assay data and one drill hole has no associated collar coordinates, leaving 112 drill holes available for resource modeling on the property. Up until acquisition of the property by GRCN, the five Roscan drill holes were the only known diamond drill holes completed on the property.
9.3 | Opinion on Data Adequacy |
Investigations of all aspects of current and historical data quality indicates that the quality of the information is suitable for an Initial Assessment of Mineral Resources.
112
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
10 | MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING |
10.1 | Historic Metallurgical Testing |
Cyanide bottle roll tests are the industry standard initial stage in assessing the gold recovery possible by cyanide leaching. During a bottle roll test, prepared ore is gently agitated in a cyanide leaching solution. Oxygen levels, alkalinity, acid consumption and other parameters are monitored and strictly controlled throughout the test.
In 1982, 24-hour agitated cyanide bottle roll tests on four bulk samples were completed by Kappes Cassidy & Associates (KCA) on mineralized material collected from the Golden Mile property (Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 1982). The samples were composited and submitted to KCA by Grayhill Exploration Company (Grayhill) as part of the Elmwood JV.
Pulverized portions were prepared from each of the samples used for the bottle roll tests. Description of the bulk samples are as follows:
● | Sample 2903A (labeled “AS-1”) weighing approximately 100 lbs and described by KCA as “mostly coarse rock 2 to 6 in maximum dimension with few fines. The sample appeared to consist of porous, well-leached volcanic fragments cemented with red and black iron oxides along ¼-inch wide fractures”. |
● | Sample 2903B (labeled “AS-2”) having the same sample weight and size distribution as 2903A and described by KCA as "nearly 100% of porous, soft yellow brown iron oxides (limonite?) with a considerable amount of apparently secondary botryoidal limonite lining vugs. Some minor jarosite or scorodite was present as coatings”. |
● | Sample 2903C, an approximately 120-pound composite from drill holes CMA-1, CMA-3 and CMA-4 described in the KCA report as "hard, very heavy black porous magnetite, with some green copper staining and some yellow-brown porous iron oxides". |
● | Sample 2903D, an approximate 100-pound composite from drill holes CMA-2 and CMA-5, described by KCA as consisting of "mostly yellow-brown, low-density, earthy, highly porous, iron-oxide-stained rich fragments (well-leached volcanics?)”. |
Each sample was treated individually and identically by KCA as follows:
1. | The entire sample was crushed through a jaw crusher set at 1.5 in |
2. | The sample was split in half and one-half was stored. |
3. | The remaining half was crushed through a jaw crusher set at 5/8th-in. |
4. | A 2-kg portion was split out from the 5/8th-inch material and the remainder was stored. |
5. | The 2-kg portion was crushed to 100% passing 6-mesh and split in half. Half was pulverized. |
6. | Two pulps were split out from the pulverized material, one for reference, and one for a bottle roll test on a 500-g portion. |
113
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The procedure used for the agitated cyanide bottle roll tests performed by KCA were as follows:
1. | Place 500-g of pulverized material into a 2-liter poly-bottle and add 750 ml of distilled water. |
2. | Adjust pH to 10.0, if necessary, with lime. |
3. | Add 3.75 g NaCN (equivalent to 5-g NaCN per liter) and place on rolls. |
4. | Check solution at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours for pH, Au, Ag and Cu. |
5. | Check NaCN in solution at 2 and 8 hours. |
6. | Filter, wash, and dry tailings. Submit for fire assay. |
The recovery of contained gold in the tests was 86% and 87% from the two “AS” samples and 81% and 84% from the two “CMA” samples. Results of bottle roll tests are in Table 10.1.
Table 10.1 Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests on Pulverized Material (KCA, 1982)
There appears to be no reason to doubt the accuracy or veracity of this work. These tests provide a preliminary metallurgical insight into the material sampled. However, at the time of the sampling, a resource had not been established and it is uncertain whether the samples collected were representative of the primary zone of mineralization.
To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no additional metallurgical testing conducted for Golden Mile mineralization since the KCA (1982) study was completed.
114
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
10.2 | GRCN Metallurgical Testing |
10.2.1 GRCN Initial Cyanide Bottle Roll Leach Testing
In 2020, GRCN had cyanide bottle roll leach tests conducted on six representative rock chip samples collected during the initial property visit (Table 10.2). The selected samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas in Sparks, NV. Each sample was pulverized, targeting 85% passing 200 mesh (Tyler). Head grades were determined by Bureau Veritas using fire assay preparation with an AAS finish. Cyanide bottle roll tests were then conducted for 96 hours on 1,000 g of pulverized sample material mixed with 2,000 mm of leach solution.
Positive bottle roll leach recoveries for gold and silver were indicated by these early-stage metallurgical tests. Gold recoveries ranged from 53% to 100% averaging 82%. Silver recoveries ranged from 48% to 73% averaging 64%. Leach kinetics were relatively fast achieving plus 65% of the total gold recovery in 2 hours as shown for Sample 3082802 in Figure 10.1.
These test results are similar to the historic cyanide bottle roll leach tests run on Golden Mile samples in 1982. Both GRCN’s and earlier tests suggest that the Golden Mile gold-deposit should be amenable to either cyanide heap leach or agitated cyanide leach processing methods.
Table 10.2 GRCN Initial Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests on Pulverized Material
Sample | Target p85 | Assayed | Bottle Roll | Au | Assayed | Bottle Roll | Ag | Leach |
Number | Mesh Tyler | Au ppm | Au ppm | % | Ag ppm | Ag ppm | % | hours |
3082801 | Pulv. | 1.613 | 1.610 | 100% | 5.9 | 3.9 | 66% | 96 |
3082802 | Pulv. | 3.629 | 2.750 | 76% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 73% | 96 |
3082804 | Pulv. | 2.824 | 2.010 | 71% | 8.8 | 5.8 | 66% | 96 |
3082806 | Pulv. | 1.091 | 0.960 | 88% | 8.3 | 4.0 | 48% | 96 |
3082807 | Pulv. | 8.457 | 4.520 | 53% | 9.3 | 5.8 | 62% | 96 |
3082809 | Pulv. | 0.268 | 0.280 | 104% | 1.1 | 0.8 | 73% | 96 |
AVERAGE | 2.980 | 2.022 | 82% | 6.2 | 3.8 | 64% |
115
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 10.1 Example of Cyanide Bottle Roll Test Results for GRCN Check Sample #3082802. Extraction %Au (Top), Extraction %Ag (Bottom); Bottle Roll Tests completed by Bureau Veritas, Sparks, NV
10.2.2 Metallic Screen Assays
During the 2020-2021 core drilling program, GRCN geologists observed visible gold in the drill core. To address a potential nugget effect, selected samples were submitted to ALS for a metallic screening assay procedure to evaluate the possibility of uneven distribution of gold. Metallic screen fire assaying (ALS Code Au_SCR21) was completed on 1 kg of sample pulp screened to 100 microns. Gravimetric analysis was completed on the entire oversize (plus) fraction and duplicate 30 g assays were also run on the screen undersize fraction. The size fraction weights, coarse and fine fraction gold content and total gold content were reported (Table 10.3).
116
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The primary goal of the metallic screen assay procedure was to give a better idea of the true assay of the sample and also say something about the content of coarse gold in the sample. The metallic screens run on these samples confirmed that the weighted average assays of the combined oversize and undersize fractions (Au Total (+)(-) Combined) were generally close to the “Original Fire Assay Result”. The difference between the assays averaged <2%. The metallic screen assay procedure also showed that the duplicate 30 g assays on the undersize fraction were repeatable with the difference between assays typically <5%.
In this sample set, the metallic screen analyses do not show a significantly different gold grade than the original fire assays. The met screens also do not show a significant amount of coarse gold. These two items suggest metallic screen analyses are not going to increase knowledge regarding grade over a typical fire assay (or multiple head assays when averaged).
Table 10.3 Metallic Screen Assays on Pulverized Material
HoleID | Sample | Original | Metallic Screen Assays (Au-SCR21) | Check Assays (inc. dup) | ||||||
Fire Assay Result | Au-AA25 | Au-AA25D | ||||||||
Au | Au Total (+)(-) | Au (+) Fraction | Au (-) Fraction | Au (+) mg | WT. + Frac | WT. - Frac | Au | Au | ||
g/t | g/t | g/t | g/t | mg | g | g | g/t | g/t | ||
GMDD-002 | 854625 | 17.45 | 24.50 | 192 | 12.4 | 12.668 | 65.9 | 915.1 | 12.1 | 12.65 |
GMDD-002 | 854626 | 0.08 | 0.10 | <0.05 | 0.11 | 0.001 | 70.28 | 854.6 | 0.1 | 0.12 |
GMDD-002 | 854627 | 0.17 | 0.09 | <0.05 | 0.1 | <0.001 | 69.69 | 914.9 | 0.11 | 0.09 |
GMDD-002 | 854628 | 15.50 | 6.48 | 30.8 | 4.2 | 2.600 | 84.3 | 899.1 | 3.95 | 4.44 |
GMDD-002 | 854629 | 10.50 | 11.75 | 47.7 | 8.68 | 3.664 | 76.89 | 898.3 | 8.96 | 8.39 |
GMDD-002 | 854648 | 12.45 | 12.25 | 37.3 | 9.65 | 3.579 | 95.9 | 921.7 | 9.68 | 9.62 |
GMDD-002 | 854649 | 0.06 | 0.07 | <0.05 | 0.08 | 0.002 | 77.19 | 891.5 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
GMDD-002 | 854650 | 6.27 | 5.53 | 18.35 | 4.34 | 1.504 | 82.03 | 878.7 | 4.46 | 4.21 |
GMDD-002 | 854651 | 4.68 | 3.97 | 3.27 | 4.05 | 0.311 | 95.02 | 876.2 | 4.13 | 3.97 |
GMDD-003 | 854494 | 1.62 | 1.25 | 1.77 | 1.19 | 0.192 | 108.25 | 863.8 | 1.09 | 1.28 |
GMDD-003 | 854495 | 1.61 | 3.30 | 3.6 | 3.27 | 0.399 | 110.7 | 838.3 | 3.08 | 3.45 |
GMDD-003 | 854496 | 0.49 | 1.91 | 1.45 | 1.95 | 0.119 | 82.33 | 893.2 | 1.83 | 2.07 |
GMDD-004 | 855744 | 0.13 | 0.13 | <0.05 | 0.14 | 0.002 | 78.91 | 922.1 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
GMDD-004 | 855745 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.22 | 0.57 | 0.017 | 78.13 | 905.3 | 0.54 | 0.59 |
GMDD-004 | 855746 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.042 | 55.18 | 930.8 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
GMDD-004 | 855747 | 0.05 | 0.06 | <0.05 | 0.06 | <0.001 | 48.8 | 902.6 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
GMDD-004 | 855748 | 0.73 | 1.05 | 3.89 | 0.76 | 0.352 | 90.49 | 873.7 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
GMDD-004 | 854786 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.048 | 105.9 | 910.8 | 0.4 | 0.25 |
GMDD-004 | 854787 | 0.38 | 0.61 | 2.33 | 0.46 | 0.184 | 79.03 | 886.4 | 0.5 | 0.42 |
GMDD-004 | 854788 | 8.66 | 9.49 | 37.1 | 7.1 | 2.919 | 78.74 | 907.4 | 6.66 | 7.54 |
GMDD-004 | 854813 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.037 | 48.23 | 934.6 | 0.45 | 0.42 |
GMDD-004 | 854814 | 1.18 | 0.73 | 7.99 | 0.15 | 0.623 | 78 | 958.9 | 0.2 | 0.09 |
GMDD-004 | 854815 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.006 | 79.76 | 934.9 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
GMDD-004 | 854816 | 4.89 | 3.21 | 7.59 | 2.79 | 0.663 | 87.34 | 893 | 2.65 | 2.92 |
GMDD-004 | 854817 | 0.15 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.001 | 77.73 | 930.1 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
GMDD-004 | 854818 | 1.03 | 1.69 | 2.21 | 1.66 | 0.114 | 51.59 | 1003.5 | 1.85 | 1.47 |
GMDD-003 | 854592 | 0.96 | 1.34 | 2.49 | 1.3 | 0.094 | 37.73 | 892.7 | 1.12 | 1.47 |
GMDD-003 | 854593 | 3.96 | 5.42 | 69.7 | 3.44 | 1.819 | 26.09 | 846.8 | 3.22 | 3.65 |
GMDD-003 | 854594 | 1.97 | 1.92 | 2.86 | 1.88 | 0.112 | 39.2 | 875.6 | 1.91 | 1.85 |
GMDD-003 | 854595 | 2.51 | 1.21 | 8.92 | 1 | 0.212 | 23.77 | 857.5 | 0.98 | 1.01 |
GMDD-003 | 854596 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 2.87 | 0.63 | 0.099 | 34.52 | 849.8 | 0.67 | 0.58 |
GMDD-007 | 854390 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.016 | 25.97 | 837 | 0.74 | 0.81 |
GMDD-007 | 854391 | 2.15 | 2.27 | 2.26 | 2.28 | 0.081 | 35.92 | 926.3 | 2.3 | 2.25 |
GMDD-007 | 854392 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.4 | 0.32 | 0.014 | 35.28 | 836 | 0.3 | 0.33 |
GMDD-007 | 854393 | 1.94 | 1.89 | 1.71 | 1.9 | 0.060 | 35.01 | 831.1 | 1.88 | 1.92 |
GMDD-007 | 854394 | 5.59 | 3.96 | 9.16 | 3.73 | 0.330 | 36.04 | 811.4 | 3.73 | 3.72 |
GMDD-007 | 854395 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.012 | 33.78 | 825.3 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
10.2.32021 Metallurgical Testing (KCA)
117
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
In early 2021, GRCN completed four PQ-size core holes in the Main Zone at Golden Mile for metallurgical testing. The location of metallurgical holes drilled at Golden Mile by GRCN are shown in Figure 7.3.
The purpose of this testwork was to evaluate process requirements to recover gold using conventional heap leaching technology. Heap leaching relies on a leaching agent moving through a bed of heaped ore to extract the metallic components, like gold and silver. The crushed ore is stacked on a leaching pad and irrigated with the leaching agent, typically cyanide. The leaching agent chemically reacts with the metal in the ore to dissolve the gold (& silver) into the solution as it percolates through the heap. The impregnated solution can then be collected at the bottom of the heap so that the gold and silver can be recovered.
Mineralized core intervals selected for metallurgical testing were sent to the KCA facility in Reno, Nevada. A total of 65 boxes of half-split PQ-size drill core representing 553 kg of material was delivered to KCA. Samples were separated into four composites based on mineralization type as described in Table 10.4. The test work completed on these composites consisted of head screen analysis (including, whole rock and QXRD), screen analysis by size fraction, comminution, bottle roll, agglomeration and column leach testing.
Table 10.4 Golden Mile Composite Core Samples Selected for Metallurgical Testing
KCA | Description | Sample Weight | Est. Grade | Est. Grade |
Kg | g/t Au | opst | ||
91201 | MET A - Jd Upper Composite | 202 | 1.790 | 0.052 |
91202 | MET B - Jd Lower Composite | 223 | 0.783 | 0.023 |
91203 | MET C - Tqp, Jd+mag, Jqd Composite | 69 | 2.641 | 0.077 |
91204 | MET D - MSK Composite | 59 | 2.115 | 0.062 |
Total | 553 | |
10.2.3.1 Head Analyses
Portions of the composite material (MET A through D) were utilized for head analyses, which included head assays, head screen analyses with assays by size fraction, multi-element analyses, whole rock analyses, and cyanide soluble test work.
A summary of the head assays for gold and silver are presented in Tables 10.5 and 10.6.
118
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.5 Gold Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites
Table 10.6 Silver Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites
Head analyses for mercury were conducted utilizing cold vapor/atomic absorption methods. Total copper analyses were conducted utilizing inductively coupled argon plasma – optical emission spectrophotometer (ICAP-OES) as well as by FAAS methods.
The results of the mercury and copper analyses are presented in Table 10.7.
Table 10.7 Mercury and Copper Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites (KCA 2021)
119
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Head analyses for carbon and sulfur were conducted utilizing a LECO CS 400 unit. In addition to total carbon and sulfur analyses, speciation for organic and inorganic carbon and speciation for sulfide and sulfate sulfur were conducted.
The results of the carbon and sulfur analyses are presented in Table 10.8.
Table 10.8 Carbon and Sulfur Head Analyses for Golden Mile Sample Composites (KCA, 2021)
Semi-quantitative analyses were conducted by means of an ICAP-OES for a series of individual elements and whole rock constituents (lithium metaborate fusion/ICAP).
The results of the multi-element analyses and whole rock analyses are presented in Tables 10.9 and 10.10.
120
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.9 Head Analyses – Multi-Element (KCA, 2021)
Description | Unit | MET A - Jd Upper | MET B - Jd Lower | MET C - Tqp, Jd+mag, Jqd | MET D – MSK |
KCA Sample No. 91501 B | KCA Sample No. 91502 B | KCA Sample No. | KCA Sample No. | ||
Al | % | 5.91 | 5.77 | 5.44 | 1.67 |
As | ppm | 110 | 218 | 122 | 7408 |
Ba | ppm | 610 | 301 | 445 | 249 |
Bi | ppm | 26 | <2 | <2 | 9 |
C(total) | % | 0.98 | 0.86 | 1.10 | 3.73 |
C(organic) | % | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.28 |
C(inorganic) | % | 0.95 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 3.45 |
Ca | % | 4.75 | 6.49 | 12.31 | 11.32 |
Cd | ppm | <1 | <1 | <1 | 6 |
Co | ppm | 6 | 9 | 8 | 39 |
Cr | ppm | 59 | 60 | 85 | 21 |
Cu(total) | ppm | 235 | 438 | 366 | 9866 |
Cu(cyanide soluble) | ppm | 94 | 167 | 116 | 4111 |
Fe | % | 1.25 | 1.75 | 3.93 | 12.54 |
Hg | ppm | 1.01 | 1.11 | 0.96 | 2.46 |
K | % | 3.11 | 2.19 | 1.44 | 0.26 |
Mg | % | 3.25 | 4.04 | 2.64 | 10.09 |
Mn | ppm | 245 | 267 | 549 | 812 |
Mo | ppm | 4 | 28 | 21 | <1 |
Na | % | 0.70 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.16 |
Ni | ppm | 9 | 10 | 7 | 13 |
Pb | ppm | 15 | 13 | 20 | 27 |
S(total) | % | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
S(sulfide) | % | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | <0.01 |
S(sulfate) | % | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
Sb | ppm | 15 | 11 | 6 | 147 |
Se | ppm | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 |
Sr | ppm | 240 | 320 | 316 | 660 |
Te | ppm | 12 | 8 | 7 | 33 |
Ti | % | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.08 |
V | ppm | 63 | 80 | 109 | 56 |
W | ppm | <10 | <10 | <10 | 14 |
Zn | ppm | 49 | 19 | 28 | 274 |
121
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.10 Head Analyses - Whole Rock (KCA, 2021)
Description | Unit | MET A - Jd Upper | MET B - Jd Lower | MET C - Tqp, Jd+mag, Jqd | MET D – MSK | ||||
KCA Sample No. | KCA Sample No. | KCA Sample No. | KCA Sample No. | ||||||
SiO2 | % | 60.09 |
| 56.47 |
| 49.65 |
| 20.83 |
|
Si | % |
| 28.09 |
| 26.40 |
| 23.21 |
| 9.74 |
Al2O3 | % | 12.34 |
| 12.52 |
| 11.46 |
| 3.69 |
|
Al | % |
| 6.53 |
| 6.63 |
| 6.07 |
| 1.95 |
Fe2O3 | % | 1.80 |
| 2.68 |
| 5.79 |
| 17.91 |
|
Fe | % |
| 1.26 |
| 1.87 |
| 4.05 |
| 12.52 |
CaO | % | 6.93 |
| 9.60 |
| 18.57 |
| 16.38 |
|
Ca | % |
| 4.95 |
| 6.86 |
| 13.27 |
| 11.71 |
MgO | % | 5.56 |
| 7.30 |
| 4.67 |
| 18.33 |
|
Mg | % |
| 3.35 |
| 4.40 |
| 2.82 |
| 11.06 |
Na2O | % | 0.87 |
| 1.38 |
| 1.19 |
| 0.04 |
|
Na | % |
| 0.65 |
| 1.02 |
| 0.88 |
| 0.03 |
K2O | % | 3.93 |
| 2.75 |
| 1.79 |
| 0.31 |
|
K | % |
| 3.26 |
| 2.28 |
| 1.49 |
| 0.26 |
TiO2 | % | 0.34 |
| 0.43 |
| 0.44 |
| 0.14 |
|
Ti | % |
| 0.20 |
| 0.26 |
| 0.26 |
| 0.08 |
MnO | % | 0.04 |
| 0.04 |
| 0.07 |
| 0.11 |
|
Mn | % |
| 0.03 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.05 |
| 0.09 |
SrO | % | 0.03 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.07 |
|
Sr | % |
| 0.03 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.06 |
BaO | % | 0.07 |
| 0.04 |
| 0.05 |
| 0.02 |
|
Ba | % |
| 0.06 |
| 0.04 |
| 0.04 |
| 0.02 |
Cr2O3 | % | 0.01 |
| 0.01 |
| 0.02 |
| <0.01 |
|
Cr | % |
| 0.01 |
| 0.01 |
| 0.01 |
| <0.01 |
P2O5 | % | 0.11 |
| 0.14 |
| 0.14 |
| <0.01 |
|
P | % |
| 0.05 |
| 0.06 |
| 0.06 |
| <0.01 |
LOI1090°C | % | 6.93 |
| 5.78 |
| 5.57 |
| 18.78 |
|
SUM | % | 99.05 |
| 99.17 |
| 99.44 |
| 96.61 |
|
NOTE: The SUM is the total of the oxide constituents and the Loss-on-Ignition
Cyanide shake tests were conducted utilizing portions of the pulverized head composite material. These tests provided preliminary indications of cyanide soluble metal extractions from pulverized material.
The results of individual cyanide shake tests are presented in Table 10.11.
122
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.11 Head Analyses – Cyanide Shake Tests (KCA, 2021)
10.2.3.2 Head Screen Analyses with Assays by Size Fraction
Head screen analysis was carried out on portions of each of the four Golden Mile sample composites received. The objective of the head screen analysis was to determine assay values from select crush size fractions. Head screen analyses were conducted utilizing portions of material crushed to 100% passing 37.5 mm (1.476 in) and 100% passing 9.5 mm (0.374 in). The minus 37.5 mm crushed material apportioned for the head screen was dry screened at 37.5, 25, 19, 12.5, 9.5, 6.3, 4.75, 2.36, 1.70 and 0.212 mm. The minus 9.5 mm crushed material apportioned for the head screen was dry screened at 9.5, 6.3, 4.75, 2.36, 1.70 and 0.212 mm.
Each separate size fraction was weighed, and the weights reported. Each size fraction was then crushed to 100% passing 1.70 mm (0.067 in), as needed. From each size fraction two (2) portions were split out and individually pulverized to a target size of 80% passing 0.075 mm (0.003 in). The portions were assayed using standard fire assaying methods for gold with FAAS finish and four-acid digestion with FAAS finish for silver.
A summary of the head screen analyses is presented in Table 10.12. The head screen analyses are presented graphically in Figure 10.2.
123
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.12 Summary of Head Screen Analyses
Figure 10.2 Head Screen Analyses Showing Cumulative Weight Percent Passing Crush Size (in inches)
124
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
10.2.3.3 Comminution Test Work
Portions of the head material for the MET A and MET B composites (KCA Sample Nos. 91501 and 91502) were submitted to Hazen Research, Inc. in Golden, Colorado for comminution testing. Comminution tests aim to measure the action of reducing a material and is used in designing and sizing the grinding circuit and to study the variation within an ore body. Test work was completed to provide Bond impact work indices (CWi) and Bond abrasion indices (Ai) for the samples.
The results are summarized in Table 10.13.
Table 10.13 Summary of Comminution Test Work (KCA, 2021)
10.2.3.4 Characterization Test Work
Portions of the head material for each separate composite were submitted to FLSmidth, Inc. in Midvale, Utah for quantitative x-ray diffraction (QXRD) and quantitative swelling clay via Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) analyses. The purpose of the characterization test work was to utilize the QXRD and CEC results to quantify the bulk mineralogy of the samples.
The results of the mineralogical analyses are presented in Table 10.14.
Table 10.14 Summary of QXRD Analyses (KCA, 2021)
125
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
10.2.3.5 Agglomeration Test Work
Ores with a high presence of fines and/or clayey particles result in poor heap permeability as the fines clog spaces between larger particles, creating pockets where leaching is inhibited or altogether prevented. The agglomeration of ore fines and clay, however, proves to greatly improve heap permeability when carried out properly by reducing these fines and transforming them into uniform pellets, which allow for uninhibited permeability. In the case of heap leaching, agglomeration relies on a binder (typically cement) and tumbling motion to cause coalescence, or the building of fines into larger particles.
Preliminary agglomeration test work was conducted on portions of the composite material (KCA Sample Nos. 91501 A/B, 91502 A/B, 91503 A and 91504 A). The purpose of the percolation tests was to examine the permeability of the material under various cement agglomeration levels (0, 2, 4 and 8 kg (0, 4.41, 8.82 and 17.64 lb) per metric tonne of Portland Type II cement). In the preliminary agglomeration testing, the agglomerated material was placed in a column (75 mm (3 in) inside diameter) with no compressive load and then tested for permeability.
This type of agglomeration test work is preliminary but does serve to provide an indication of whether or not agglomeration will be required for the processing of the material at the tested crushed sizes. These specific tests should be indicative of cement requirements for a single lift heap having an overall height of not more than 8 m (26 ft). If a multiple lift heap leach operation is being developed then additional agglomeration test work will be required and this test work should include examinations of the material under a static load (this test work is described as compacted permeability test work). For agglomeration test work conducted by KCA, the parameters that are typically examined are slump, maximum flow rate, agglomerate pellet break down (when material is agglomerated) and discharge solution color and clarity (or the “visual” turbidity of the solution).
The results of the agglomeration test work (including a pass/fail results) are shown in Table 10.15.
126
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.15 Summary of Agglomeration Test Work (KCA, 2021)
10.2.3.6 Percent Slump and Final Apparent Bulk Density
The height of material in each column was measured before and after leaching. This height was utilized to calculate the “slump” during leaching as well as to calculate the final apparent bulk density for the material in the column. The percent slump of a column gives an indication of potential permeability problems in production heaps. KCA typically classifies slumps larger than 10% as high.
The height, slump and final apparent bulk density from column leach tests are presented in Table 10.16.
Table 10.16 Percent Slump and Final Apparent Bulk Density (KCA, 2021)
127
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
10.2.3.7 Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests
Coarse and pulverized bottle roll leach tests were completed on portions of the composite material (MET A through D; KCA Sample Nos. 91501 B, 91502 B, 91503 A and 91504 A). A portion of the head material for each individual composite sample was stage crushed to 100% passing 1.70 millimeters. Portions of the stage crushed material were utilized for coarse bottle roll leach test work. Additionally, portions of the stage crushed material were pulverized by ring and puck to a target size of 80% passing 0.075 millimeters and utilized for pulverized bottle roll leach test work. The bottle roll tests ran for a total of 72 hours and utilized a target sodium cyanide concentration of 1.0 g per liter. After completion, the tailings were rinsed and filtered. Portions of the tails were split out and assayed for gold and silver.
For the coarse crushed bottle roll leach tests, intermittent rolling was utilized to reduce particle attrition.
The procedure for the bottle roll leach test is outlined in the following:
1. | A 1,000 g portion of sample material was placed into a 3.5 liter plastic and slurried with 1,500 milliliters of Reno municipal tap water. |
2. | The slurry was mixed thoroughly and the pH was checked. The pH of the slurry was adjusted, as required, to 10.5 to 11.0 with hydrated lime. |
3. | Sodium cyanide was added to the slurry to a target amount of 1.0 g per liter sodium cyanide. The bottle was then placed onto a set of laboratory rolls. The coarse material was rolled intermittently (rolling for two (2) minutes every hour), while the pulverized material was rolled continuously throughout the test. |
4. | The slurry was checked at 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48, hours for pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), NaCN, Au, Ag and Cu. |
5. | Additional hydrated lime and sodium cyanide were added after each sample period, as required, to adjust the slurry to the target levels. |
6. | After completion of the leach period, the slurry was filtered, washed, dried, and assayed for residual gold and silver content. |
The extraction results of the KCA 2021 bottle roll tests showed gold recoveries ranging from 38 to 94% with finer fractions (<0.075 mm) typically between 90 and 94%. Silver recoveries ranged from 33 to 64% with finer fractions (<0.075 mm) around 61%. The gold and silver extraction results of the bottle roll test are summarized in Table 10.16. Figure 10.3 shows overall gold extraction percentages and indicates higher gold recoveries for the fine fraction for Golden Mile sample composites.
Figures 10.4 and 10.5 show graphical results of gold and silver extraction during the leach period for the fine pulverized MET A Jd upper composite sample, showing typical recovery curves obtained for these cyanide bottle roll tests. Both fine pulverized Jd upper and lower composites tested showed rapid leach kinetics achieving plus 65% of the total gold recovery in 2 hours.
128
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.17 Summary Direct Agitated Cyanidation (Bottle Roll) Gold-and Silver Test Results (KCA 2021)
129
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 10.3 Overall Gold Extraction for the Golden Mile Bottle Roll Tests (KCA, 2021)
130
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 10.4 Bottle Roll Test Results Showing % Gold Extraction During Leach Period for KCA Test #91508A Performed on Fine Pulverized (P80 0.075 mm) Sample of MET A JD Upper Composite
Figure 10.5 Bottle Roll Test Results Showing % Silver Extraction During Leach Period for KCA Test #91508A Performed on Fine Pulverized (P80 0.075 mm) Sample of MET A JD Upper Composite
131
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
10.2.3.8 Column Leach Test Work
Column leach test work was conducted on portions of the composite material (MET A through D; KCA Sample Nos. 91501 A/B, 91502 A/B, 91503 A and 91504 A). The crushed composite material split out for column test work was blended with lime and agglomerated with cement and then loaded into a 203 mm (8 in) or 152 mm (6 in) diameter plastic column (Fig. 10.6). Alkaline cyanide solution was continuously distributed onto the material through Tygon tubing. The flow rate of solution dripping onto the material was controlled with a peristaltic pump to 10 to 12 liters per hour per square meter of column surface area. The material was leached with a 1.0 g per liter sodium cyanide solution for 115 days.
The results of the column leach tests for gold and silver are summarized in Tables 10.17 and 10.18. Gold extractions from the column leach tests are presented graphically in Figure 10.7.
Figure 10.6 Column Leach Test Apparatus
132
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
133
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 10.18 Summary of Metal Extractions and Chemical Consumptions – Gold (KCA, 2021)
Table 10.19 Summary of Metal Extractions and Chemical Consumptions – Silver (KCA, 2021)
Figure 10.7 Cyanide Leach Test Work. Gold Extraction vs. Days of Leach (KCA, 2021)
134
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Column leach test work was conducted on portions of the 2021 composite core samples crushed to a target size of 80% passing 25 mm (0.98 in) and 80% passing 6.3 mm (0.25 in). Gold extractions for the coarse (<37.5 mm; 1.48 in) column leach tests were 80% based on calculated heads which ranged from 1.639 g/t (0.048 opst) to 1.806 g/t (0.052 opst) Au. The sodium cyanide consumptions ranged from 1.70 kg (3.75 lb) to 1.92 kg (4.23 lb) per metric tonne. The material utilized in leaching was blended with 1.27 kg (2.80 lb) to 1.52 kg (3.35 lb) per metric tonne hydrated lime.
Gold extractions for the fine (<9.5 mm; 0.37 in) column leach tests ranged from 51% to 86% based on calculated heads which ranged from 1.328 g/t (0.039 opst) to 4.506 g/t (0.132 opst) Au. The sodium cyanide consumptions ranged from 1.69 kg (27.98 lb) to 5.06 kg per metric tonne. The material utilized in leaching was blended with 1.49 (3.28 lb) to 2.78 kg (6.13 lb) per metric tonne hydrated lime and agglomerated with about 1 kg (2.20 lb) per metric tonne cement. Column test extraction results were based upon carbon assays vs. the calculated head (carbon assays + tail assays). Silver extractions were generally good, ranging from 53 to 92% but typically in the mid 70% to mid 80% range.
The column leach test results for both gold and silver exhibited rapid leach kinetics with 80 to 90 percent of total recovery occurring in the first 10 days of leaching.
10.3 | Opinion on Adecuacy |
The Qualified Persons have reviewed these results. The GRCN metallurgical testing, especially the column leach test work, supports the planned metal recovery as well as the planned cyanide consumption. The GRCN metallurgical testing and historical test work are deemed to be representative of the deposit and the Qualified Persons consider that these data are appropriate and adequate for estimation of mineral resources.
135
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
11 | MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES |
11.1 | Introduction |
On October 31, 2018, the SEC announced that it was adopting amendments to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, and related guidance, under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC, 2018a, 2018b). Under the final rules, a registrant with material mining operations must disclose specified information in Securities Act and Exchange Act filings concerning its Mineral Resources, in addition to its Mineral Reserves. A registrant is required to begin to comply with the new rules starting its first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.
The modeling and estimation of Mineral Resources presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of September 30, 2021.
The modeling and Mineral Resource estimation work reported herein was carried out by Fred H. Brown, P.Geo., a Qualified Person by reason of education, affiliation with a professional association and past relevant work experience. Mr. Brown is an independent consulting geologist specializing in Mineral Resource estimation, and is therefore, independent of GRCN. Mr. Brown was previously employed as a Senior Resource Geologist by GRCN from 2017 through June of 2021.
Modeling and estimation of Mineral Resources were carried out using the commercially available Maptek Vulcan software program, version 12.
Any statements and opinions expressed in this document are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements and opinions are not false and misleading as of the effective date of this report.
11.2 | Mineral Resource Definitions |
The SEC has adopted the Combined Reserves International Reporting Standards Committee (CRIRSCO) framework for reporting Mineral Resources (Miskelly, 2003). According to CRIRSCO, a Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of intrinsic economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust (a deposit) in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. Portions of a deposit that do not have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction must not be included in a Mineral Resource.
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the Mineral Resource will be converted into Mineral Reserve.
136
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
11.2.1 Inferred Mineral Resources
An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a low level of confidence. It is inferred from geological evidence and assumed but not verified geological and/or grade continuity. It is based on information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes which is limited or of uncertain quality and/or reliability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource. Confidence in the estimate of Inferred Mineral Resources is insufficient to allow the meaningful application of technical and economic parameters.
11.2.2 Indicated Mineral Resources
An Indicated Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of confidence. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings, and drill holes. The locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological continuity and/or grade continuity but are spaced closely enough for continuity to be assumed. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource but has a higher level of confidence than that applying to an Inferred Mineral Resource.
11.2.3 Measured Mineral Resources
A Measured Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and mineral content can be estimated with a high level of confidence. It is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings, and drill holes. The locations are spaced closely enough to confirm geological and/or grade continuity.
11.3 Database
The modeling and estimation reported herein utilized the drill hole database compiled by GRCN. The database used Imperial units, expressed as feet, short tons, and ounces per short ton. Bulk densities have been converted to short tons per cubic feet. The coordinate reference system used is the Nevada State Plane NAD 83 (ESPG code 6523).
Industry standard validation checks were carried out on the supplied databases, and minor corrections made where necessary. The database was reviewed for inconsistencies in naming conventions or
137
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
analytical units, duplicate entries, interval, length or distance values less than or equal to zero, blank or zero-value assay results, out-of-sequence intervals, intervals or distances greater than the reported drill hole length, inappropriate collar locations, and missing interval and coordinate fields.
Drill holes with assay samples occurring within mining claims hosting the Golden Mile deposit were imported into a Maptek Vulcan database. The resulting drill hole database used for Mineral Resource estimation contains 150 unique collar records (Table 11.1) and 10,962 assay records (Table 11.2), broken down by drilling type as:
● | RC: 131 reverse circulation drill holes for 14,597 m (47,889 ft) |
● | DDH: 19 diamond drill holes for 2,843 m (9,327 ft) |
A 3D view of all holes drilled in the Main Zone area of the Golden Mile property is shown on Figure 11.1.
Topographic surveying of GRCN 2020-2021 drill hole collars was undertaken by Kevin Haskew of Reno, Nevada, a registered professional surveyor. All plots were delivered as stamped referenced plats along with corresponding digital data files. Verification of field locations were also validated with registered air photographs and drone surveys.
Table 11.1 Golden Mile Drill Hole Database Summary
Description | DDH | RC | Total |
Number of Drill Holes | 19 | 131 | 150 |
Total Length Drilled | 2,843 m (9,327 ft) | 47,889 | 57,216 |
Average Hole Length | 149.7 m (491 ft) | 111.6 m (366 ft) | 116.1 m (381 ft) |
Drill Holes with Downhole Surveys | 13 | 42 | 55 |
Table 11.2 Golden Mile Assay Database Summary
Assay Summary | DDH | RC | Total |
Number of Assays | 1,861 | 9,101 | 10,962 |
Total Length Assayed | 2,829.5 m (9,283 ft) | 13,869.6 m (45,504 ft) | 16,699.1 m (54,787 ft) |
Average Assay Length | 1.52 m (4.99 ft) | 1.52 m (5.00 ft) | 1.52 m (5.00 ft) |
Average Grade Au | 0.38 g/t (0.011 opst) | 0.24 g/t (0.007 opst) | 0.27 g/t (0.008 opst) |
Average Grade Ag | 0.48 g/t (0.014 opst) | 0.38 g/t (0.011 opst) | 0.41 g/t (0.012 opst) |
138
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 11.1 3D Isometric View Looking Northwest with the Golden Mile Drill Holes
Industry standard validation checks of the database were carried out with minor corrections made where necessary. The database was interrogated for inconsistencies in naming conventions or analytical units, duplicate entries, interval, length or distance values less than or equal to zero, blank or zero-value assay results, out-of-sequence intervals, intervals or distances greater than the reported drill hole length, inappropriate collar locations, and missing interval and coordinate fields. No significant discrepancies with the data were noted.
11.3.1 Drill Data
Drill hole distance units were supplied by GRCN in feet and grade units were supplied as ounce per short ton. The collar coordinates were provided in the Nevada State Plane NAD 83 coordinate system. All data were supplied electronically as csv format files.
The average minimum collar distance within the mine area is 17.4 m (57 ft). Summary assay statistics were tabulated for the assay data (Table 11.3).
139
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 11.3 Summary Assay Statistics
Assay Data | Length | Au opst | Ag opst |
Mean | 1.52 m (5.00 ft) | 0.274 g/t 0.008 (opst) | 0.41 g/t (0.012 opst) |
Median | 1.52 m (5.00 ft) | 0.034 g/t (0.001 opst) | 0.205 g/t (0.006 opst) |
Mode | 1.52 m (5.00 ft) | 0.000 g/t (0.000 opst) | 0.137 g/t (0.004 opst) |
Standard Deviation | 0.11 m (0.36 ft) | 2.40 g/t (0.07 opst) | 1.610 g/t (0.047 opst) |
Minimum | 0.3 m (1 ft) | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) | 0.00993 g/t (0.00029 opst) |
Maximum | 8.63 m (28.3 ft) | 130.86 g/t (3.821 opst) | 75.31 g/t (2.199 opst) |
CoV | 0.07 | 8.46 | 3.93 |
Count | 10,962 | 10,962 | 7,070 |
11.4 | Bulk Density |
A total of 44 bulk density values were measured by laboratory pycnometry on DDH core drilled in 2020-2021. Values ranged from 2.54 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 12.61) to 3.12 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 10.27), with a median of 2.79 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 11.48) and an average value of 2.75 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 11.65). For this resource estimate, a bulk density of 2.79 tonnes per cubic meter (tonnage factor 11.48) was assigned to the model for all units.
Rock Quality Designation (RQD) data were collected by GRCN from DDH core holes drilled in 2020-2021 and suggests the presence of multiple zones of poor recovery, fractures and voids (Figure 11.2). An additional factor may be required to accommodate the presence of voids and fractured rocks.
140
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 11.2 Plot of RQD vs. Elevation
11.5 | Mineralization Modeling |
11.5.1 Topography
A topographic model covering the Main Zone area of the Golden Mile property was created by GRCN staff using aerial photogrammetry collected on October 1, 2021. An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) collected 658 high resolution aerial photographs over the Main Zone area at a nominal elevation of 119 m (390 ft) above ground level (AGL) (Fig. 11.3) and a ground sampling distance (GSD) of 3.3 cm (1.3 in) per pixel. Cloud based processing was used to generate a high resolution orthomosaic, 3D reconstruction, a dense point cloud, and a digital elevation model (DEM). The point cloud was converted to a 3D topographic surface for modeling.
141
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 11.3 Aerial Photometry with Ground Control Points
On board the UAV global navigation satellite system (GNSS) an electronic compass, barometric sensor, and inertial measurement unit (IMU) were used to estimate photograph geolocation. Surveyed ground control points (GCP) were used for indirect georeferencing to WGS84. Table 11.4 lists the GCP geolocation errors.
Table 11.4 GCP Geolocation Errors
GCP | X Error (in) | Y Error (in) | Z Error (in) |
3 | 0.1575 | 0.0827 | -0.3504 |
16 | 0.3307 | 0.2047 | 0.0866 |
19 | -0.3268 | -0.2913 | 0.5000 |
40 | -0.1614 | 0.0039 | -0.2323 |
Total (RMSE) | 0.2584 | 0.1828 | 0.3295 |
142
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
11.5.2 Mineralization Envelopes
Due to the complex nature of the observed grade distribution, a mineralization domain for the Main Zone was generated using the Leapfrogtm software Radial Basis Function (RBF) interpolent, with a primary orientation trending northwest to southeast. The RBF interpolant generates a smoothed 3D volume based on all of the input data.
The Main Zone mineralization domain is constrained by a minimum Au assay grade of 0.34 g/t (0.010 opst) and where appropriate incorporates lower grade assays. The resulting mineralization system crosses the Dunlap and Luning Formations and extends slightly into the modeled intrusive units near the contact. Mineralization domains for the Magnetite Skarn (“MSK”) and the Northwest Skarn were also generated in Leapfrogtm based on lithological logging. (Fig, 11.4). The resulting mineralization domains were used to back-tag assay and composite intervals and provide reasonable volume constraints to the Mineral Resource.
Figure 11.4 3D Isometric View Looking Northwest of the Mineralization Domains.
11.6 | Compositing |
The average length of assay intervals within the defined mineralization domains is 1.52 m (5.00 ft), with a mode of 1.52 m (5.00 ft) and a median length of 1.52 m (5.00 ft) (Figure 11.5). Assays were therefore composited to 1.52 m (5.00 ft) within the defined domains. Where appropriate residual end-of-section composite lengths less than 0.76 m (2.50 ft) were merged with the adjacent interval. A small number of missing intervals were assigned a nominal value of 0.00034 g/t Au (0.00001 opst) during compositing.
143
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 11.5 Plot of Constrained Assay Sample Lengths
11.7 | Exploratory Data Analysis |
Summary statistics were calculated for the composite sample populations (Table 11.5). The highest gold values occur in the center of the Main Zone. There is insufficient data available to characterize the silver sample populations outside of the Main Zone.
Table 11.5 Constrained Composite Statistics for Gold Values
Au | Main Zone | MSK | NW Skarn | Total |
Mean | 1.64 g/t (0.048 opst) | 1.40 g/t (0.041 opst) | 0.65 g/t (0.019 opst) | 1.58 g/t (0.046 opst) |
St Dev | 5.89 g/t (0.172 opst) | 1.58 g/t (0.046 opst) | 0.51 g/t (0.015 opst) | 5.58 g/t (0.163 opst) |
Median | 0.51 g/t (0.015 opst) | 0.82 g/t (0.024 opst) | 0.51 g/t (0.015 opst) | 0.51 g/t (0.015 opst) |
Minimum | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) | 0.03 g/t (0.001 opst) | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) |
Maximum | 118.70 g/t (3.466 opst) | 6.82 g/t (0.199 opst) | 2.19 g/t (0.064 opst) | 118.70 g/t (3.466 opst) |
CoV | 3.575 | 1.109 | 0.798 | 3.506 |
Count | 1,166 | 92 | 57 | 1,315 |
Ag | Main Zone | MSK | NW Skarn | Total |
Mean | 0.55 g/t (0.016 opst) | 1.68 g/t (0.049 opst) | NA | 0.62 g/t (0.018 opst) |
St Dev | 1.23 g/t (0.036 opst) | 3.22 g/t (0.094 opst) | NA | 1.37 g/t (0.040 opst) |
Median | 0.21 g/t (0.006 opst) | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) | NA | 0.21 g/t (0.006 opst) |
Minimum | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) | NA | 0.00034 g/t (0.00001 opst) |
Maximum | 15.58 g/t (0.455 opst) | 17.47 g/t (0.510 opst) | NA | 17.47 g/t (0.510 opst) |
CoV | 2.283 | 1.923 | NA | 2.257 |
Count | 1,166 | 92 | NA | 1,258 |
144
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
The gold sample distributions for RC and DDH composites in the Main Zone were also examined for evidence of bias (Figure 11.6). The results suggest that RC drilling has in general slightly undervalued the higher-grade diamond drilling (DD) results.
Figure 11.6 RC vs. DDH Drilling Results
11.8 | Treatment of Extreme Values |
The potential influence of extreme values during estimation was evaluated by grade capping analysis on the tagged and composited grade intervals in order. The presence of high-grade outliers was identified by disintegration analysis of the upper tails and examination of histograms and log-probability plots (Fig. 11.7). Composite grades were reduced to the selected threshold prior to estimation. For the Golden Mile Main Zone, an additional range restriction of 18.3 m (60 ft) was placed on composites equal to the capping threshold.
145
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
146
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 11.7 Log-Probability Plots of Composite Capping Thresholds
147
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Table 11.6 Capping Thresholds
| Au | Ag | ||||||
| Cap | Number | Capped | Percent | Cap | Number | Capped | Percent |
Main Zone | 17.12 g/t (0.500 opst) | 12 | 1.34 g/t (0.039 opst) | 37% | 13.70 g/t (0.400 opst) | 2 | 0.55 g/t (0.016 opst) | 5% |
MSK | NA | 0 | NA | NA | 13.70 g/t (0.400 opst) | 7 | 1.61 g/t (0.047 opst) | 51% |
NW Skarn | NA | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | NA | NA |
11.9 | Continuity Analysis |
Continuity analysis was carried out for the Main Zone on normal-score transformed variograms using composited Au grade intervals (Figure 11.8). The Main Zone variography suggests a dip range of approximately 36.6 m (120 ft) and a strike range of approximately 34.1 m (112 ft). A distance of 27.4 m (90 ft), equal to 75% of the observed range, was selected as a basis for Mineral Resource classification.
Figure 11.8 Main Zone Variography
148
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
11.10 | Block Model |
An orthogonal block model was established across the area with the block model limits selected to cover the extent of the Mineral Resources and accommodate a potential pit shell (Table 11.7). A parent block size of 4.9 m (16 ft) x 4.9 m (16 ft) x 6.1 m (20 ft) was selected as representative of the pit shell configuration and selective mining unit.
Table 11.7 Block Model Setup
Origin | Offset | Block Size | Sub-Cell | |
X | 2856700.0 | 3200 | 4.9 m (16 ft) | 0.3 m (1.0 ft) |
Y | 14491000.0 | 4000 | 4.9 m (16 ft) | 0.3 m (1.0 ft) |
Z | 6000.0 | 1300 | 6.1 m (20 ft) | 0.3 m (1.0 ft) |
The block model contains variables for Au and Ag grade estimation, bulk density, classification and drill hole spacing. A small amount of historical mining has taken place at Golden Mile. It is considered to be economically insignificant and was not depleted from the Mineral Resources.
11.11 | Estimation and Classification |
Inverse Distance Cubed (“ID3”) and Nearest Neighbor (“NN”) estimates were carried out using capped composites. A minimum of four and a maximum of nine composites were used for estimation, with a maximum of three composites from a single drill hole. The search ellipsoid oriented parallel with each defined mineralization domain and extending a maximum of 91.4 m (300 ft) The major and semi-major axes approximate the average strike and dip directions of the mineralization. Both gold and silver were modeled and estimated, but Ag is not included in the Mineral Resource due to limited information on this commodity.
In order to provide a whole block estimate suitable for open pit mine planning and future reserve reporting, the block model was regularized after estimation to a 4.9 m (16 ft) x 4.9 m (16 ft) x 6.1 m (20 ft) whole block estimate by volume percent and diluted at zero grade.
The relevant factors used in the classification process were:
● | Drill hole spacing density, |
● | Level of confidence in the geological interpretation, |
● | Observed continuity of mineralization, and |
● | Direct proximity to a drill hole. |
Parent blocks were classified algorithmically by drill hole spacing geometry as follows:
149
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
● | A block was classified as an Indicated Mineral Resource if three or more drillholes used for estimation are within 27.4 m (90 ft). |
● | All other estimated blocks are classified as Inferred. |
The primary source of uncertainty for Indicated Mineral Resources is the modeling of grade continuity. The current mineralization envelopes are based on geological mapping, structural logging and variography, which may change moving forward with additional drilling. The influence of higher-grade assays on grade continuity has also been mitigated by applying a range restriction of 18.3 m (60 ft) to composite values of 17.12 g/t (0.500 opst) or higher. Additional uncertainty is associated with the observed RQD results, which suggest extensive fracture filling, and may bias the estimate in terms of volume and grade distribution.
The primary source of uncertainty for Inferred Mineral Resources is the extrapolation beyond the drilling. This has been mitigated by reducing the mineralization envelope beyond current drilling.
An example of a typical cross section showing the drill hole data and modeled mineral-domain envelopes in in the Main Zone of the Golden Mile property is shown in Figure 11.9.
Figure 11.9 Typical Cross-Section of Golden Mile Main Zone Looking NW Showing Gold Grades (opst)
150
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
11.12 | Mineral Resource Estimate |
GRCN models and estimates Mineral Resources prior to establishing Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources at Golden Mile are further defined by GRCN as Mineral Resources within a constraining pit shell and above a defined cutoff value. The cutoff grades used are marginal cutoff grades based on 2020 actual costs for FGC’s nearby Isabella Pearl open pit, heap leach mine in Nevada, a mining operation similar in scope to that envisioned for Golden Mile. These cutoff grades are used to produce the optimized Lerchs-Grossman pit shell. The marginal cutoff grades are used to determine if an already mined-out ton is treated as ore or waste. In other words, a marginal cutoff assumes that the block in question must be mined and determines whether it should be processed or not. It should not be confused with breakeven cutoff grades, which include an allowance for the cost of stripping.
Economic parameters used for the cutoff calculation were supplied by GRCN and are derived from unit costs and recoveries from 2020 operational results at the Isabella-Pearl Mine (Table 11.8). The gold price of $1,700 selected by GRCN represents a slightly conservative outlook compared to the 24-month trailing average of $1,745 per ounce as of September 30, 2021.
Mineral Resources reported herein have been constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman optimized pit shell and are reported at a cutoff grade of 0.34 g/t (0.010 opst). The results from the optimized pit shell are used solely for the purpose of reporting Mineral Resources and include both Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources (Figure 11.10).
Table 11.8 Parameters Used for Mineral Resources Cutoff Calculation
Description | Unit | Value |
Gold Price | $/oz | 1,700 |
Charges | % | 0.075 |
Royalty | % | 3.00 |
Selling Cost | $/oz | 37.60 |
Processing Cost + G&A | $/t | 11.04 |
Recovery | % | 81 |
Cutoff | g/t | 0.34 |
Cutoff | opst | 0.010 |
151
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Figure 11.10 3D Isometric View of the Optimized Pit Shell for Golden Mile Deposit
Indicated Mineral Resources reported at Golden Mile contain 2.16 million tonnes (2.38 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.13 g/t (0.033 opst). Inferred Mineral Resources reported are 2.40 million tonnes (2.64 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.10 g/t (0.032 opst) (Table 11.9).
Table 11.9 Mineral Resource Inventory at Golden Mile, Mineral County, Nevada, USA (as of September 30, 2021)1 2 3 4
Class | Tonnes | Short Tons | Au (g/t) | Au (opst) | Au (oz) |
Indicated | 2,160,000 | 2,380,000 | 1.13 | 0.033 | 78,500 |
Inferred | 2,400,000 | 2,640,000 | 1.10 | 0.032 | 84,500 |
5. | Reported at a cutoff of 0.34 g/t Au (0.010 opst). |
6. | Whole block diluted estimates are reported within an optimized pit shell. |
7. | Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
8. | Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. |
11.13 | Mineral Resource Estimate Sensitivity |
The sensitivity of the Mineral Resource inventory to changes in cutoff grade was also examined by summarizing tonnes and grade within the pit shell at varying cutoff grades (Table 11.10).
Table 11.10 Cutoff Grade Sensitivity for the Golden Mile Deposit
Class | Cutoff | Tonnes | Short Tons | Au (g/t) | Au (opst) | Au (oz) |
Indicated | 0.17 g/t (0.005 opst) | 2,630,000 | 2,900,000 | 0.99 | 0.029 | 84,100 |
0.34 g/t (0.010 opst) | 2,160,000 | 2,380,000 | 1.13 | 0.033 | 78,500 | |
0.68 g/t (0.020 opst) | 1,320,000 | 1,450,000 | 1.54 | 0.045 | 65,300 | |
1.03 g/t (0.030 opst) | 770,000 | 850,000 | 2.06 | 0.060 | 51,000 | |
1.37 g/t (0.040 opst) | 490,000 | 540,000 | 2.54 | 0.074 | 40,000 | |
1.71 g/t (0.050 opst) | 330,000 | 360,000 | 3.05 | 0.089 | 32,000 | |
Inferred | 0.17 g/t (0.005 opst) | 2,820,000 | 3,110,000 | 0.99 | 0.029 | 90,200 |
0.34 g/t (0.010 opst) | 2,400,000 | 2,640,000 | 1.10 | 0.032 | 84,500 | |
0.68 g/t (0.020 opst) | 1,540,000 | 1,700,000 | 1.44 | 0.042 | 71,400 | |
1.03 g/t (0.030 opst) | 910,000 | 1,000,000 | 1.85 | 0.054 | 54,000 |
152
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
153
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| 1.37 g/t (0.040 opst) | 630,000 | 690,000 | 2.16 | 0.063 | 43,500 |
1.71 g/t (0.050 opst) | 360,000 | 400,000 | 2.61 | 0.076 | 30,400 |
11.14 | Risk Factors |
Relevant factors which may affect the estimation of Mineral Resources include changes to the geological, geotechnical and geometallurgical models, infill drilling to convert material to a higher classification, drilling to test for extensions to known Mineral Resources, collection of additional bulk density data and significant changes to commodity prices. It should be noted that these and other factors pose potential risks and opportunities, of greater or lesser degree, to the estimate as the model is based on currently available data. Risks associated with key estimation parameters are tabulated in Table 11.11.
Table 11.11 Mineral Resource Estimation Risk Factors
Category | Description | Risk | Potential for Adverse Impact |
Database | Database Integrity | Database combines historical and recent drilling | Low |
Database | Database Integrity | Database errors | Low |
Drilling | Recovery | A wide range of RQD values were logged | Medium |
Drilling | Data Density | Sufficient drilling coverage at this stage | Low |
Drilling | Survey | Good collar coverage | Low |
Geology | Geological Interpretation | An up-to-date geology model is available | Low |
Model | Estimation | Industry standard estimation used | Low |
Model | Bulk Density | Sufficient samples are available to calculate a global bulk density | Low |
Model | Grade Continuity | Grade continuity is based on drilling coverage and may change due to the nature of the mineralization | Medium |
Model | Metal At Risk | A large proportion of the contained metal is derived from a small number of samples | High |
Model | Mineralization | Fracture style mineralization may overestimate metal content at SMU scale | High |
Model | Economics | Based on current operating costs | Low |
Model | Recoveries | Conservative compared to recent met studies | Low |
Sampling | Predominantly 5 ft. samples | Consistent across DD and RC sampling | Low |
Sampling | Quality of assay data | Industry standard use of QAQC | Low |
Sampling | Quality of assay data | Some issues with standards noted | Low |
11.15 | Opinion on Adequacy |
Mr. F Brown, the QP responsible for Section 11, considers that the GRCN 2020 2021 drilling program results meet industry standards for drilling and QA/QC measures. Mr. Brown also considers that the relevant historical drilling results have been reviewed in sufficient detail for inclusion in the generation of Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource estimates. Mr. F Brown believes that all issues relating to relevent technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction can be resolved with further work.
154
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
12 | MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES |
Mineral Reserve estimates for the Golden Mile property were not prepared according to the amendments adopted by the SEC to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants, and related guidance, which are currently set forth in Item 102 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and in Industry Guide 7 (SEC, 2018 a, b).
The CRIRSCO framework of applying modifying factors to Mineral Resources reported herein for the Golden Mile property were not undertaken in order to convert them to Mineral Reserves.
155
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
13MINING METHODS
No description of proposed mining methods for the Golden Mile property has been prepared for this TRS.
156
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
14PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS
No description of proposed mineral processing and recovery methods for the Golden Mile property has been prepared for this TRS.
157
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
15INFRASTRUCTURE
No description of the required infrastructure for the Golden Mile property has been prepared for this TRS.
158
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
16MARKET STUDIES
No description of market studies for the products of the Golden Mile property has been prepared for this TRS.
159
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
17 | ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS, OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS |
No description of the factors pertaining to environmental compliance, permitting, and local individuals or groups, which are related to the Golden Mile property, have been prepared for this TRS.
160
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
18CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS
No estimates of capital and operating costs for the Golden Mile property have been prepared for this TRS.
161
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
19ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
No description of the key assumptions, parameters, and methods used to demonstrate economic viability, nor material assumptions including discount rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, and taxes, royalties, and other governmental levies or interests applicable to the Golden Mile property have been prepared for this TRS.
162
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
20ADJACENT PROPERTIES
A recent review of the BLM claim records by the QP’s has been completed. This review indicates that Registrant-properties and adjacent properties held by competitors which surround the Golden Mile property are under apparently valid mining claims. Relevant information concerning these properties are described in this TRS.
20.1Registrant Properties
GRCN controls additional claims adjoining the Golden Mile property including the Mina Gold property. GRCN also operates and controls several other properties within a 50 km (31 mi) radius. These properties include GRCN’s currently operating property, the Isabella Pearl mine, and the East Camp Douglas and County Line exploration properties (Fig. 20.1).
Figure 20.1 Map of the Properties in the Vicinity of the Golden Mile Property (GRCN properties highlighted in light blue; Other properties highlighted in dark blue)
163
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
20.1.1Mina Gold
GRCN purchased the Mina Gold property from Nevada Select in August 2016. The property is located approximately 13 km (8 mi) northwest of the Golden Mile property and covers an area of approximately 657 hectares (1,624 acres) consisting of 74 unpatented lode mining claims and 5 patented claims. The Mina Gold property adjoins the Golden Mile property to the northwest. Gold mineralization at Mina Gold is hosted by epithermal quartz veins occurring along fault zones in volcanic host rock outcropping at the surface. Mina Gold has been tested by over 313 historic exploration drill holes which encompass more than 16,246 m (53,300 ft) of drilling. Historic drill intercepts encountered gold at shallow depths (<60 m; 196 ft) including 7.4 g/t (0.22 opst) gold over 12.2 m (40 ft), 11.8 g/t (0.34 opst) gold over 4.6 m (15 ft) and 5.0 g/t (0.15 opst) gold over 6.1 m (20 ft). Historic metallurgical reports completed by Legend Metallurgical Laboratory, Inc. Reno, NV, includes column leach tests at minus 15 cm (6 in) rock returned 80% gold recovery in 60 days. Minus 1.3 cm (0.5 in) rock returned 75% gold recovery in 2 days. The best gold recoveries will likely require particle agglomeration prior to heap leaching. FGC acquired 100% of the Mina Gold property from Nevada Select for $1,000,000, which included shares of restricted common stock valued at $850,000 and cash of $150,000 representing a one-time advanced royalty payment. Nevada Select retained a 3% NSR royalty on the patented claims and 2% NSR royalty on the unpatented claims. FGC retained the right to buy down 1% of the NSR royalty on the patented claims for $1,000,000 and 0.5% of the NSR royalty on the unpatented claims for $500,000.
20.2Adjacent Properties
The Golden Mile property is situated along strong structural controls and alignments within the Walker Lane mineral belt which hosts numerous significant epithermal gold and silver deposits. The closest (<90 km; 56 mi) and most significant adjacent properties held by other owner/operators include Santa Fe, Paradise Peak, Denton-Rawhide, Candelaria and Borealis (Fig. 20.1).
164
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
21OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
GRCN continues to evaluate the known mineralized zones among a much larger conceptual project plan of multiple open pits along a trend at Golden Mile to the northwest and onto the Mina Gold property. This includes evaluating the potential of at least three pits feeding ore to a strategically located heap leach and process facility. The conceptualized process plant is being evaluated to take the gold to the carbon stage and then haul the carbon for processing at GRCN’s absorption/desorption/recovery (ADR) facility at Isabella Pearl for final doré production.
There is no other additional information or explanation necessary to provide a complete and balanced presentation of the value of the property to the registrant. This TRS was prepared to be as understandable as possible and to not be misleading.
165
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
22INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS
Golden Mile is an advanced exploration property with a favorable economic projection based on Mineral Resources estimated and reported herein.
22.1 | Interpretation |
The Golden Mile property is underlain by Triassic, dominantly carbonate Luning Formation, and Jurassic, dominantly siliciclastic Dunlap Formation. The older Luning Formation is interpreted to be thrust on top of the younger Dunlap Formation, and both units are folded and faulted into steeply dipping to overturned beds. The Luning Formation in the property area is largely dolomitic and exposures south of the Road Fault are unmetamorphosed, dark gray, carbonaceous limestone and fossiliferous micrite. In contrast, the Dunlap Formation is mostly composed of siltstone and sandstone, which are locally calcareous. The Luning and Dunlap formations are intruded by several phases of granitoid rocks, mainly granodiorite and a quartz-feldspar porphyry (Golden Mile Stock), which is interpreted to be related to a skarn event (Ray, 2016). Meinert (2021) believes that on a district scale, the series of coarse-grained, equigranular quartz monzonite and granodiorite plutons are likely to be Late Cretaceous, whereas a smaller, porphyritic granodiorite and quartz monzonite porphyry stocks are likely Tertiary in age. In the northern part of the property, the older sedimentary and intrusive rocks are unconformably overlain by Tertiary volcanic rocks that post-date the skarn mineralization.
There are two main types of alteration in the Golden Mile district, hornfels and skarn (Meinert, 2021). Hornfels is the more extensive alteration type and consists of a biotite alteration of clastic rocks of the Dunlap Formation. As with most gold skarns, the biotite hornfels likely forms an aureole around the ore deposit. With increasing alteration intensity, the biotite hornfels is veined and overprinted by pyroxene, followed by vesuvianite, followed by garnet. This alteration sequence thus forms a bullseye relative to heat and fluid transfer from the source (Meinert, 2021).
On surface, the most impressive Au-Cu (Fe) exoskarn mineralization is seen at the Main Zone of Golden Mile. It is characterized by large pods and lenses of massive magnetite which are accompanied by gold, chalcopyrite, pyrite and variable amounts of Cu and Fe oxides as well as Cu-Fe-Mn wad (Ray, 2016). The surface mineralization is mainly hosted by garnet-bearing exoskarn that is often quartz-silica-rich with varying quantities of retrograde alteration, including epidote, chlorite, amphibole, and in the more dolomitic rocks phlogopite, serpentinite and brucite. Trace quantities of wollastonite and possible very fine-grained clino-pyroxene were also seen. One notable feature of the skarn is the local presence of abundant fine to coarse-grained phlogopite that in some parts is spatially associated with magnetite. Phlogopite is particularly common at the north end of the Main Zone.
All mineralization at Golden Mile occurs within the area that has hornfels formed dominantly from siliciclastic rocks and skarn alteration formed dominantly from carbonate rocks. From the observed
166
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
mineralogy, most of the skarn protolith in the Golden Mile district was dolomitic, which results in magnesian skarn minerals (Meinert, 2021). Because of the dominance of magnesium rather than iron in the skarn minerals, the excess iron typically forms abundant magnetite, as is observed in the Main Zone pit. The magnetite is particularly important as a reactant for later, lower temperature Au-bearing fluids. Only limited calcic skarn has been observed on surface and in drill core.
Most of the high-grade gold mineralization, as confirmed by the oriented core study, appears to be associated with narrow (<2 cm), NW trending veins and fractures (Butner, 2021). The high-grade veins consist dominantly of quartz-calcite-chlorite-pyrite-iron oxide +/- envelopes of feldspar and clay. The identification of dominantly northwest-trending high-grade structures helps to explain lack of correlation in earlier northwest-directed drill holes. Where these veins encountered reactive alteration mineralogy such as magnetite or magnesium skarn, the gold mineralization is more disseminated, thus explaining the Main Zone magnetite-pit mineralization (Meinert, 2021).
22.2 | Conclusions |
Golden Mile is currently a moderate-sized, mineralized gold (silver-copper-iron) system with potential for developing gold resources and additional exploration targets. Historic surface and underground rock sampling, together with previous and current drilling, have defined significant, locally high-grade, gold values locally in association with magnetite skarn with minor silver-copper mineralization.
Three types of mineralization have been identified at Golden Mile and each could host economic gold deposits (Ray, 2016). These include: (a) bulk tonnage, open-pit mineable gold hosted within the endoskarn-altered quartz porphyry (Golden Mile Stock), (b) gold ± copper ± magnetite mineralization hosted by the garnet-quartz exoskarn envelope developed outboard from the Golden Mile Stock, and (c) massive sulfide-magnetite replacements or mantos formed distal (up to 1 km or more) from the Golden Mile Stock thermal aureole.
Lower grade disseminated mineralization occurs in intrusive, limestone, and locally in overlying Tertiary volcanic rocks. Intercepts of +30 m (100 ft) grading + 0.9 g/t Au (0.025 opst) to 81 m (265 ft) grading +0.5 g/t Au (0.015 opst) have been intersected in numerous drill holes. Alteration includes stockwork veining, argillic alteration and some silicification. A broad halo of low-grade (>0.1 g/t Au; 0.003 opst) disseminated gold mineralization envelopes the high-grade mineralization. The drill defined resource is open ended in nearly all directions.
Column leach test work yielded gold extractions of 80% for coarse composite material (<37.5 mm; 1.48 in) based on calculated heads ranging from 1.639 g/t (0.048 opst) to 1.806 g/t (0.053 opst) Au. Gold extractions for the fine composite material (9.5 mm; 0.37 in) column leach tests ranged from 51% to 86% based on calculated heads which ranged from 1.328 g/t (0.039 opst) to 4.506 g/t (0.132 opst) Au. Column leach test results exhibited rapid leach kinetics with 80 to 90 percent of total recovery occurring in the first 10 days of leaching.
167
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
KCA (2021) estimates gold extraction for an ore body based upon the assumption that the ore to be mined will be similar to the samples tested. KCA normally discounts laboratory gold extractions by two to three percentage points when estimating field extractions. KCA normally discounts laboratory silver extractions by three to five percentage points when estimating field recoveries. This assumes a well-managed heap leach operation, and if agglomeration is required, it is assumed that this process is completed correctly. Based upon KCA’s experience with mostly clean non-reactive ores, cyanide consumption in production heaps would be only 25 to 33 percent of the laboratory column test consumptions. For ores containing high amounts of leachable copper, higher factors should be utilized.
Mineral Resources described herein have been delineated by appropriate drilling and/or sampling to establish continuity and supports an estimate of tonnage and an average grade of the selected metals. GRCN has evaluated and performed verification of the Golden Mile drill hole database and considers the assay data to be adequate for the estimation of the Mineral Resources. The resulting drill hole database contains 150 unique collar records and 10,962 assay records, broken down by drilling type as:
● | RC: 131 reverse circulation drill holes for 14,597 m (47,889 ft) |
● | DDH: 19 diamond drill holes for 2,843 m (9,327 ft) |
Mineral Resources at Golden Mile are further defined within a constraining pit shell and above a defined cutoff value. Mineral resources reported herein has been constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman optimized pit shell and are reported at a cutoff grade of 0.34 g/t Au (0.010 opst).
Indicated Mineral Resources reported at Golden Mile contain 2.16 million tonnes (2.38 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.13 g/t (0.033 opst). Inferred Mineral Resources reported are 2.40 million tonnes (2.64 million short tons) of material at an average gold grade of 1.10 g/t (0.032 opst). The modeling and estimation of Mineral Resources presented herein is based on technical data and information available as of September 30, 2021.
Several factors may affect the estimation of Mineral Resources including changes to the geological, geotechnical and geometallurgical models. In particular, the resource model showed a large proportion of the contained metal is derived from a small number of samples and fracture style mineralization may overestimate metal content at the mining (SMU) scale. Infill drilling to convert material to a higher classification is recommended to mitigate these risks.
168
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
23 | RECOMMENDATIONS |
The QP’s preparing this report for GRCN recommend that the Golden Mile property proceed with a prefeasibility study to move the property forward to a development decision. The conceptualized plan being evaluated is open pit mining and heap leaching of the gold deposit, taking the gold to the carbon stage at Golden Mile, and then hauling the carbon for processing at the parent company’s ADR facility at its nearby Isabella Pearl mine for final doré production.
Metallurgical testing was recently completed by a third-party process metallurgical services company specializing in column heap leaching and test results are currently being reviewed. Engineering, base line and background studies are on-going which include process facility layout, open-pit design and infrastructure evaluations. Some additional studies are also recommended that may improve value and optimizations including additional drilling to convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves, and additional geotechnical studies to possibly steepen pit slopes. Mineralization at Golden Mile remains open along strike and at depth.
23.1 | Proposed Exploration Program |
For future exploration, particularly in the vicinity of the Main Zone deposit north of the Road Fault, it will be important to better understand the structure of the northwest-trending gold-bearing quartz-pyrite-chlorite veins and the stratigraphy and resulting alteration mineralogy of the Dunlap and Luning Formations. Investigations would include additional surface mapping to define location and geometry of carbonate host rocks and preparation of stratigraphic cross-sections to help define the subsurface extent of the carbonate host rocks, particularly near the granodiorite-quartz feldspar porphyry intrusions.
The intersection of structure, stratigraphy, and alteration appears to control the Au distribution at Golden Mile. A study of the alteration patterns is likely to show zones that were not tested by previous drilling. Structure-controlled mineralization is also open at depth and 3D review of structure and alteration would likely help to define drill areas of deeper carbonatehosted gold mineralized targets. Mineralization appears to extend north and northwest under post-mineral volcanic cover and additional drilling is also warranted in this direction.
Metal ratio modeling of the Golden Mile gold mineralized system is recommended. The distribution of metals in ore deposits is commonly zoned due to gradients in temperature or fluid composition but the absolute concentration of particular elements can also vary in response to other factors such as structure, stratigraphy, or host rock composition (Meinert, 2021).
No coherent historic soil sampling has been done on the property. Thus, soil sampling at 100-meter orthogonal spacing’s should be completed over the area south of the Tertiary volcanic cover. Some
169
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
reconnaissance soil sampling lines should also be run over the volcanic rocks further north in case there are post-volcanic fracture zones that may reveal the presence of mineralization at depth.
Geophysical techniques, especially magnetic surveys, have been useful in tracing the granodiorite and quartz feldspar porphyry intrusions beneath volcanic cover. A series of various geophysical surveys were completed by several of the previous owners over many years, however none of this data has been coherently integrated or reviewed in context of modern drilling and geologic setting understanding. An effort to complete this is warranted.
Additional future work shall also include 1) documenting the stratigraphy of the Dunlap and Luning Formations, particularly the distribution of magnesian and calcic carbonate units in the Luning Formation, 2) identifying the magnesian skarn mineralogy, especially important is to work out skarn zonation and evaluating vectors to mineralization, 3) and dating some of the igneous rocks, to obtain U-Pb zircon ages on the main igneous phases, especially the granodiorite–quartz porphyry phases that appear to be most closely related to alteration and mineralization, and Ar-Ar ages of amphibole and mica in both igneous and skarn rocks
The proposed exploration program for the Golden Mile property is shown in Table 23.1. The estimated cost of the recommended exploration program is $2.5 M. The proposed budget includes for 12,192 m (40,000 ft) of RC drilling for Mineral Resource expansion and exploration outside of the Main Zone deposit area.
Table 23.1 Budget for Proposed Exploration at Golden Mile Property
Description | Total Cost ($) |
Salaries and Wages | 120,000 |
Vacation Days | 3,000 |
Health Insurance | 3,000 |
401K Expense | 3,600 |
Payroll Taxes Employer | 12,000 |
Workers Compensation Insurance | 6,000 |
Contractors Drilling (RC) – 12,192 m (40,000 ft) | 1,100,000 |
Contractors Maintenance | 60,000 |
Contractors Services | 200,000 |
Material Used by Contractors | 200,000 |
Topographical Studies | 12,000 |
Environmental Studies | 60,000 |
Laboratory Assays | 500,000 |
Maintenance Vehicles | 600 |
Software & Licenses (non-cap) | 3,000 |
Consulting Services | 60,000 |
Airfare | 1,200 |
Lodging | 12,000 |
Meals | 6,000 |
Other Travel Expenses | 6,000 |
Gasoline | 3,000 |
Field Supplies and Materials | 36,000 |
Allocation of Labor Costs | 90,000 |
Golden Mile Property Exploration Total | 2,497,400 |
170
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
23.2 | Proposed Technical Studies |
Proposed technical studies shall include, but are not limited to, a study of geotechnical requirements for final pit slope angles to ensure that the most optimal pit slopes are utilized and that proper setbacks are applied to the dump toes near the final pit crest, and a blasting fragmentation study, open pit and waste dump designs. Further metallurgical test work is recommended on Golden Mile mineralization to confirm viability of Heap Leach, Carbon Adsorption/Desorption and Electrowinning gold recovery of oxide and sulfide Mineral Resources in the Golden Mile Main Zone deposit. This shall also include large column test work on near-surface Run-of-Mine (ROM) material. A geometallurgical model to further characterize the Mineral Resources in the Golden Mine deposit and Waste Rock Characterization studies are also recommended. A hydrologic and mine water source review is on-going and water well drilling, including monitoring wells, is included in the proposed budget.
A more detailed geotechnical study will also serve to further de-risk the Golden Mile property and could also lead to improvements. Once core drilling and the geotechnical study have been completed, the open pit and dump designs should be reviewed and modified, if necessary, to reflect the new geotechnical information.
Waste Rock Characterization studies will investigate the potential for development of Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching (ARDML) due to oxidation of sulfide minerals that are unstable under atmospheric conditions. Upon exposure to oxygen and water, sulfide minerals will oxidize, releasing metals, acidity and sulfate.
It is also recommended that ore control methodologies be reviewed to determine if fire assaying for blast holes is more suitable than using cyanide-leach assays. Cyanide leach assays returned for resource drill holes at Golden Mile have shown to be highly variable and are likely unreliable for grade control purposes.
Recommendations for continued engineering, geotechnical, metallurgical, base line and background studies at Golden Mile are shown in Table 23.2. The estimated cost of the recommendations total $1.0 M.
Table 23.2 Budget for Proposed Technical Studies at Golden Mile Property
Description | Total Cost ($) |
Core Drilling & Geotechnical Study | 300,000 |
Blasting Fragmentation Study | 50,000 |
Metallurgical Test Work | 60,000 |
Geometallurgical Study | 40,000 |
Waste Rock Characterization | 30,000 |
Hydrogeologic Study | 20,000 |
Water Well Drilling | 400,000 |
Monitor Well Drilling | 100,000 |
Total | 1,000,000 |
171
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
24 | REFERENCES |
Albino, G. V. and Boyer, C. I., 1992, Lithologic and structural controls of gold deposits of the Santa Fe district, Mineral County, Nevada: in Craig, S. D., ed., Structure, Tectonics and Mineralization of the Walker Lane, Geological Society of Nevada Walker Lane Symposium Proceedings Volume, p. 187-211.
Anderson, E., Berger, B.R., and Miggins, D., 2012, Timing, magnitude and style of Miocene deformation, west-central Walker Lane belt, Nevada, Lithosphere; v. 4; p. 187-208; Geological Society of America data repository item # 2012085.
Burtner, G., 2021, Golden Mile Downhole Structural Review, unpublished report for Fortitude Gold Corporation, 31 p.
Carlson, C. W., Pluhar, C. J., Glen, J. M. G., and Farner, M. J., 2013, Kinematics of the west-central Walker Lane: Spatially and temporally variable rotations evident in the Late Miocene Stanislaus Group, Geosphere; online 13, December 2013, 10.1130/GES00955.1; Geological Society of America, p. 22.
Colgan, J. P. Dumitru, T. A., McWilliams, M., and Miller, E. L., 2006, Timing of Cenozoic volcanism and Basin and Range extension in northwestern Nevada: New constraints from the northern Pine Forest Range, Geological Society of America Bulletin, January/February 2006; v. 118, no. ½; repository item 2006013, p. 126-139.
Cox, D.P. and Singer, D.A., 1986, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693: U. S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 1693, Model 18b, 282. p.
Dix, R.B., 1982, Cyanide bottle roll tests on Grayhill Exploration bulk samples. Unpublished report of tests by Kappes Cassidy & Associates for Grayhill Exploration Company.
Doebrich, J.L. and Theodore, T. G. (1996}: Geologic history of the Battle Mountain mining district, Nevada, and regional controls on the distribution of mineral systems; in Geology and Ore Deposits of the American Cordillera (A.R. Coyner & P.L. Fahey, eds.) Geol. Soc. Nevada, Reno/Sparks 1, 453-483.
Dunne, K., 2017, Petrography Report, 15 Rock Grab Samples and 6 Drill Core Samples, Golden Mile Property, Bell Mining District, Mineral County, Nevada. Unpublished report for Kinross Gold USA Inc. 161 p.
Einaudi, M.T., Meinert, L.D., Newberry, R.J., 1981, Skarn deposits. In Seventy-fifth Anniversary Volume, 1906-1980, ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, (B.J. Skinner, ed.). Economic Geology Publishing Co. p. 317-391.
Ferguson, H. G, and Muller, S. W., 1949, Structural geology of the Hawthorne and Tonopah Quadrangles (a Study of pre-Tertiary rocks and Jurassic diastrophism), Nevada, Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 216, p. 64.
172
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Ferranti, L., Oldow, J. S., Geissman, J. W., and Nell, M. M., 2009, Flattening strain during coordinated slip on a curved fault array, Rhodes Salt Marsh extensional basin, central Walker Lane, west-central Nevada, Geological Society of America Special Paper 447, p. 189-213.
Gatchell, B., 1989, Summary Report Golden Mile project. Unpublished report for Battle Mountain Exploration Company.
Hickey, Robert J.,1992, The Buckhorn Mountain (Crown Jewel) gold skarn deposit, Okanogan County, Washington; Economic Geology; v. 87; no. 1; p. 125-141.
Hudson, D., 1998, Geology of the Golden Mile Project, Mineral County, Nevada. Unpublished report for Teck Resources Inc.
Hudson, D., 1999, Petrography of Drill Cuttings from Holes GMT-2 and GMT-3, Golden Mile Project, Mineral County, Nevada. Unpublished report for Teck Resources Inc.
Jaramillo, S.M., 1975, “J” Claims, Mina, Inter-office correspondence between Standard Slag Company and Colorado Energy.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 1982, Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests on Grayhill Exploration Bulk Samples, Internal Company Report for Grayhill Exploration Company, 3p.
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2021, Golden Mile Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work September 2021, Internal Company Report for Fortitude Gold Corp., 168p.
Kern, R.R., 1998, Technical Report, CMA Property, Mineral County, Nevada. Unpublished report for Prism Resources.
Kinross, 2019, Cedar Mountain Complex, Mineral County, Nevada, Unpublished Internal Report by Kinross Gold USA Inc., 9 p.
Kuzma, G., 1999, 1999 Summary Report Golden Mile Project. Unpublished Report for Teck Resources Inc.
Meinert, L., 2021, Observations on the Golden Mile Project. Unpublished Report for Fortitude Gold Corporation, 53 p.
Miskelly, N., 2003, Progress on International Standards for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Reserves by Norman Miskelly, Chairman, Combined Reserves International Reporting Standards Committee (CRIRSCO) dated September 20, 2003; 22p.
O'Donnell, M., 2006, Report on the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, Nevada Technical Report prepared for Columbus Gold Corporation (formerly Purple Vein Resources Ltd., 109p.
Pegg, C.W., 1988, Golden Mile Gold Property, Bell Mining District, Mineral County, Nevada; Elmwood Resources, Inc Internal Report, Toronto, Ontario, April 3, 1988.
173
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
Pullman, S.A, 1983, The Petrography and Petrology of a Portion of the Northern Cedar Mountains, Mineral County, Nevada, unpublished Master of Science Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, 139 p.
Ray, G.E., 2016, The Geology & Recommendations for Exploration at the Golden Mile Au-Cu (Fe) Skarn Property, Nevada. Confidential Report Prepared for Kinross Exploration.
Ristorcelli, S., 2006, Summary review of Golden Mile Project, Mineral County, Nevada. Unpublished Report by Mine Development Associates to Andy Wallace, Cordex Exploration Co., 7p.
Roscan, 2011, Golden Mile Project Summary Drill Report, August 2011, unpublished private company report, 11 p
Ross, D.C., 1961, Geology and Mineral Deposits of Mineral County, Nevada: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Report No. 27.
SEC, 1992, Industry Guide 7: Description of property by issuers engaged or to be engaged in significant mining operations. Release No. FR-39, July 30, 1992, effective August 13, 1992, 57 Federal Register 36442.
SEC, 2018a, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 17 CFR Parts 229, 230, 239, and 249, RIN 3235-AL81, Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants, Final Rule; 453 pgs.
SEC, 2018b, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Adopts Rules to Modernize Property Disclosures Required for Mining Registrants, Press Release (Release Nos. 33-10570; 34-84509; File No. S7-10-16) Dated October 31, 2018; 3 pgs.
Suda, R.U. (2009): Technical report on the Golden Mile Project. For Portage Minerals Inc., November 16th 2009, 47 pages.
Tingley, S. L., 1999, Generalized geologic map of Nevada, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Map 57, Million-Scale, Education Series 30, small print map E30.
Vanderburg, W.O., 1937, Reconnaissance of Mining Districts in Mineral County. US Bureau of Mines Information Circular 6941, p. 17 - 22.
Wikipedia website, viewed 01 August 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org
Wright, J.L., 2017, Golden Mile Property Geophysical Compilation VTEM Survey. Unpublished Report for Kinross Exploration.
Wright, J.L., 2018, Golden Mile Property Gravity & Induced Polarization Surveys GIS Database. Unpublished Report for Kinross Exploration.
174
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
25 | RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT |
Preparation of this TRS has relied on information provided by the registrant for matters discussed herein. This TRS was prepared to be as understandable as possible and to not be misleading.
175
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY
A.1 | Definition of Terms |
The following terms used in this report shall have the following meanings:
Adit: | Horizontal drive into a hill that is usually driven for the purpose of intersecting or mining an ore body. An adit may also be driven into a hill to intersect or connect a shaft for the purpose of dewatering. Adits were commonly driven on a slight incline to enable loaded mine trucks to have the advantage of a downhill run out, while the empty (lighter) truck was pushed uphill back into the hill. The incline also allows water to drain out of the adit. An adit only becomes a tunnel if it comes out again on the hill somewhere, like a train tunnel. |
Andesite: | An extrusive igneous, volcanic rock, of intermediate composition, with aphanitic to porphyritic texture characteristic of subduction zones (eg. western margin of South America). |
Doré: | Unrefined gold and silver bars usually containing more than 90% precious metal. |
Epithermal: | Used to describe gold deposits found on or just below the surface close to vents or volcanoes, formed at low temperature and pressure. |
Gram: | A metric unit of weight and mass, equal to 1/1000th of a kilogram. One gram equals .035 ounces. One ounce equals 31.1035 grams. |
Hectare: | Another metric unit of measurement, for surface area. One hectare equals 1/200th of a square kilometer, 10,000 square meters, or 2.47 acres. A hectare is approximately the size of a soccer field. |
| |
Hornfels: | Fine-grained metamorphic rock formed by the contact between mudstone/shale, or other clay-rich rock, and a hot igneous body at a shallow depth. Typically show little sign of the action of directed pressure and crystals display little orientation. |
| |
Kilometer: | Another metric unit of measurement, for distance. The prefix “kilo” means 1000, so one kilometer equals 1,000 meters, one kilometer equals 3,280.84 feet, which equals 1,093.6 yards, which equals 0.6214 miles. |
Mineral Resources: | Mineral Resources are a concentration or occurrence of material of intrinsic economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust (a deposit) in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. Portions of a deposit that do not have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction must not be included in a Mineral Resource. |
Net Smelter Return Royalty: | A share of the net revenue generated from the sale of metal produced by the mine. Usage-based payments made by one party (the “licensee”) to another (the “licensor”) for the right to ongoing use of an asset, sometimes called an intellectual property. Typically agreed upon as a percentage of gross or net revenues derived from the use of an asset or a fixed price per unit sold. |
Ore or Ore Deposit: | Rocks that contain economic amounts of minerals in them and that are expected to be profitably mined. |
Silicified: | Is combined or impregnated with silicon or silica. |
| |
Skarn | Lime-bearing siliceous rock produced by the metamorphic alteration of limestone or dolomite. |
176
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
| |
Tonne: | A metric ton. One tonne equals 1000 kg. It is approximately equal to 2,204.62 pounds. |
| |
VulcanTM: | Maptek-Vulcan 3D geology and mining modeling software program |
| |
Conversion Table | |
Metric System | Imperial System |
1 meter (m) | 3.2808 feet (ft) |
1 kilometer (km) | 0.6214 mile (mi) |
1 square kilometer (km2) | 0.3861 square mile (mi2) |
1 square kilometer (km2) | 100 hectares (has) |
1 hectare (ha) | 2.471 acres (ac) |
1 gram (g) | 0.0322 troy ounce (oz) |
1 kilogram (kg) | 2.2046 pounds (lbs) |
1 tonne (t) | 1.1023 short tons (T) |
1 gram/tonne (g/t) | 0.0292 ounce/ton (oz/t) |
Unless stated otherwise, all measurements reported here are metric and currencies are expressed in constant U.S. dollars.
A.2 | Abbreviations |
Other common abbreviations encountered in the text of this report are listed below:
˚C | degree Centigrade |
AA | atomic absorption |
AAL | American Assay Laboratories, Inc. |
AAS | Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy |
ADR | Absorption/Desorption/Recovery |
Ag | Silver |
ALS | ALS Chemex and/or ALS USA Inc. |
Au | Gold |
BLM | Bureau of Land Management |
Bureau Veritas | Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratories |
Chemex | ALS Chemex and./or ALS USA Inc. |
cm | centimeter |
core | diamond core-drilling method |
Cu | copper |
DDH | Diamond Drill (Core)Hole |
177
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
EA | Environmental Assessment |
EPA | Environmental Protection Agency |
FA | Fire Assay |
FAAS | Fire assay with an atomic absorption finish |
FGC | Fortitude Gold Corporation |
ft or (‘) | feet = 0.3048 metre |
gms Au/MT | grams of gold/metric tonne |
g/t | gram/metric tonne |
g/t Au | grams of gold per metric tonne |
g | gram(s) = 0.001 kg |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
gpm | gallons per minute |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
GRCN | GRC Nevada Inc. |
ha | hectare(s) |
Hazen | Hazen Research Inc. |
in or (“) | inch, 2.54 cm = 25.4 mm |
K-Ar | Potassium-Argon (referring to age date technique) |
KCA | Kappes, Cassiday & Associates |
kg | kilogram, or kg/t (kilogram per tonne) |
km | kilometer |
lb | pound |
l | liter |
LOM | Life-of-Mine |
m | meter |
M | Million U.S. Dollars |
Ma | million years age |
masl | meters above sea level |
MDA | Mine Development Associates |
mean | arithmetic average of group of samples |
μm | microns |
mi | mile |
mm | millimeter |
MSHA | Mine Safety and Health Administration |
NDWR | Nevada Division of Water Resources |
NEPA | National Environmental Policy Act |
NI 43-101 | Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 |
NSR | Net Smelter Return |
Opst | Ounces per short ton |
Ounce | Troy ounce, or 31.1035 g |
oz. | ounce |
P80 3/4” | 80% passing a ¾” screen |
P100 3/8” | 100% passing a 3/8” screen |
Pb | lead |
POO | Plan of Operations |
ppb | parts per billion |
ppm | parts per million = g/t |
RC | reverse-circulation drilling method |
ROM | Run-of-Mine |
RQD | Rock Quality Designation |
QA/QC | Quality Assurance/Quality Control |
178
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
QP | Qualified Person |
SEC | Securities Exchange Commission |
SRM | Standard Reference Material |
t, tonne | metric tonne = 1.1023 short tons |
T, Ton | Imperial or short ton |
Tpd, or tpd | tonnes per day |
USDA | US Department of Agriculture |
USFWS | US Fish & Wildlife Service |
USGS | US Geological Survey |
$US Dollars | |
wt | weight |
Zn | zinc |
179
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
APPENDIX B: CERTIFICATES OF QUALIFIED PERSONS
FRED H. BROWN, P.GEO.
I, Fred H. Brown, do hereby certify that:
1. I have worked as a geologist continuously since my graduation from university in 1987.
2. This certificate applies to the TRS titled “Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, Nevada” (the “TRS”), with an effective date of September 30, 2021.
3. I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from New Mexico State University in 1987. I obtained a Graduate Diploma in Engineering (Mining) in 1997 from the University of the Witwatersrand and a Master of Science in Engineering (Civil) from the University of the Witwatersrand in 2005. I am registered with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia as a Professional Geoscientist (#171602) and the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration as a Registered Member (#4152172).
4. I am currently self-employed as a Consulting Geologist specializing in Mineral Resource estimates.
5. I certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional organization and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person”.
My relevant experience for the purpose of the TRS is:
6. I am a co-author of this TRS and specifically responsible for Section 11 and contributed to parts of Sections 8 and 9.
Effective Date: September 30, 2021
{SIGNED}
[Fred H. Brown]
_______________________________
Fred H. Brown, P.Geo
180
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
BARRY D. DEVLIN, P.GEO.
I, Barry D. Devlin, do hereby certify that:
1. I have worked as a geologist continuously since my graduation from university in 1981.
2. This certificate applies to the TRS titled “Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, Nevada” (the “TRS”), with an effective date of September 30, 2021. .
3. I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree with honors in Geology in 1981 and a Masters in Geology, 1987, from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver Canada. I am registered with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia as a Professional Geoscientist (#109658).
4. I am currently employed as Vice President, Exploration with Gold Resource Corporation, a Colorado corporation.
5. I certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional organization and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person”.
My relevant experience for the purpose of the TRS is:
Project Geologist, U.S. Borax & Chemical Corp | 1981-1984 |
Project Geologist, Derry, Michener, Booth & Wahl/Dolly Varden Minerals | 1985-1986 |
Chief Mine Geologist, Total Erickson Resources Ltd | 1987 |
Senior Project Geologist, Welcome North Mines Ltd | 1988-1989 |
Chief Mine Geologist/District Geologist/Exploration Manager, Hecla Mining Company | 1990-April 2007 |
Vice President, Exploration, Endeavour Silver Corp | May 2007-December 2012 |
Vice President, Exploration, Gold Resource Corp | January 2013-February 2021 |
Vice President, Exploration, Fortitude Gold Corp | March 2021-Present |
6. I am a co-author of this TRS and specifically responsible for Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21, 24, 25 and contributed to parts of Sections 6, 7, 20, 22 and 23.
Effective Date: September 30, 2021
{SIGNED}
[Barry D. Devlin]
_______________________________
Barry D. Devlin, P.Geo
181
AMENDED 2021 INITIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE GOLDEN MILE PROPERTY, NEVADA
JOY L. LESTER, SME-RM
I, Joy L. Lester, do hereby certify that:
1. I have worked as a geologist continuously since my graduation from university in 1996.
2. This certificate applies to the TRS titled “Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, Nevada” (the “TRS”), with an effective date of September 30, 2021.
3. I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 1996. I obtained a Master of Science degree in Geology from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2004.
4. I am registered with the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration; Registered Member #4119722RM.
5. I am currently employed as Chief Geologist with Fortitude Gold Corporation, a Colorado corporation.
6. I certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional organization, and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person”.
My relevant experience for the purpose of the TRS is:
Exploration Geologist, Gold Reserve Inc. Km 88, Venezuela, Exploration site | 1996-1999 |
Exploration Geologist, Hecla Venezuela, La Camorra Mine | 2002-2004 |
Exploration Geologist, Patagonia Gold S.A, Lomada Leiva and Cap Oeste Mines | 2004-2008 |
Senior Exploration Geologist/Project Manager Landore Resources Ltd., Ontario, Canada | 2008-2012 |
Consultant Geologist, Exploration, Gold Resource Corp. El Aguila Mine, Oaxaca Mex | 2013-2014 |
Chief Geologist, Gold Resource Corp., Nevada and El Aguila Mine Oaxaca Mexico | 2014-2020 |
Chief Geologist, Fortitude Gold Corp., Nevada | 2021-Present |
6. I am a co-author of this TRS and specifically responsible for Sections 6, 7 and contributed to parts of Sections 20, 22 and 23.
Effective Date: September 30, 2021
{SIGNED}
[Joy L. Lester]
_______________________________ Joy Lester, P.Geo
182
Exhibit 96.7
Barry D. Devlin, P.Geo
Fortitude Gold Corporation
2886 Carriage Manor Point, Colorado Springs, CO 80906
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Barry Devlin, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of all or part of the technical report summary titled Amended Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, NV with an effective date of 30 September 2021 as signed and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).
Furthermore, I state that:
(a)I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Fortitude Gold Corp.;
(b) | the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is 10-K/A Annual Report (the “Document”); |
(c) | I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and |
(d) | I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible. |
Dated at Lakewood, Colorado, USA this 14 of December 2022.
/s/ Barry Devlin
Signature of Qualified Person
P. Geo. #109658
Exhibit 96.8
Fred H. Brown, P.Geo
FHB Consulting Services, Inc.
863 Main Street, Lynden, WA 98264
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Fred Brown, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of all or part of the technical report summary titled Amended Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, NV with an effective date of 30 September 2021 as signed and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).
Furthermore, I state that:
(a)I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Fortitude Gold Corp.;
(b) | the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is 10-K/A Annual Report (the “Document”); |
(c) | I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and |
(d) | I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible. |
Dated at Lynden, Washington, USA this 14 of December 2022.
/s/ Fred Brown
Signature of Qualified Person
P. Geo. #171602
Exhibit 96.9
Joy Lester, SME-RM
Fortitude Gold Corporation
2886 Carriage Manor Point, Colorado Springs, CO 80906
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Joy Lester, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of all or part of the technical report summary titled Amended Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary for the Golden Mile Property, Mineral County, NV with an effective date of 30 September 2021 as signed and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).
Furthermore, I state that:
(a)I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Fortitude Gold Corp.;
(b) | the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is 10-K/A Annual Report (the “Document”); |
(c) | I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and |
(d) | I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible. |
Dated at Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA this 14 of December 2022.
/s/ Joy Lester
Signature of Qualified Person
SME-RM 4119722RM