UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission file number 001-12669

(863) 293-4710

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

​

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262 (b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.   ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b) ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was $5,764,999,000 based on the closing sale price of $76.42 per share on June 30, 2024. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors and executive officers of the registrant have been deemed affiliates. The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 19, 2025 was 101,364,547.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 - 14 of this form 10-K.

​

SouthState Corporation

Index to Form 10-K

​

1

Forward-Looking Statements

The disclosures set forth in this Report are qualified by Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and the section captioned “Forward Looking Statements” in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Report and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this Report.

2

As is the case with banking institutions generally, our operations are materially and significantly influenced by the real estate market, general economic conditions, and by the tax, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. and state government and regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve. Deposit flows and costs of funds are influenced by interest rates on competing investments and general market rates of interest. Lending activities are affected by the demand for financing of real estate, equipment, receivables and other commercial collateral, and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest rates at which such financing may be offered and other factors affecting local demand and availability of funds, including tax rates and regulatory structure. We face strong competition in the attraction of deposits (our primary source of lendable funds) and in the origination of loans. See “Competition.”

Products and Services

Lending Activities

Our loan portfolio includes commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and consumer loans. The principal risk associated with each category of loans we make is the creditworthiness of the borrower. Borrower creditworthiness is affected by general economic conditions and the attributes of the borrower and the borrower’s market or industry. Attributes of the relevant business market or industry include the competitive environment, customer and supplier availability, the threat of substitutes and barriers to entry and exit.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. As of December 31, 2024, $17.9 billion, or 53%, of our loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by commercial real estate (including owner occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate, other income producing property and construction and land development lending). We offer construction financing, acquisition financing or refinancing of properties, commercial lines of credit and other loans that are secured by commercial real estate.

Residential Real Estate Loans. As of December 31, 2024, $8.7 billion, or 26%, of our loan portfolio consisted of residential real estate loans including home equity loans. We provide one-to-four family residential real estate loans with terms ranging from 10 to 30 years, with either fixed or adjustable interest rates and home equity lines. It is not our normal business practice to originate subprime loans. Our closed-end first lien loans are for purposes of property purchased, or for refinancing existing loans. The majority of our loans are owner occupied, full documentation loans.

Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”) Loans. As of December 31, 2024, $6.2 billion, or 18%, of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial loans. Our C&I loans include lines of credit, acquisition finance credit facilities and other types of commercial credit, and typically have maturities of five years or less. We also have a SBA 7(a) line of business whereby we routinely sell the government guaranteed portion of the SBA loans to investors with the unguaranteed portion of the loan and the servicing rights retained.

Other Consumer Loans. As of December 31, 2024, $1.1 billion, or 3%, of our loan portfolio consisted of other types of consumer loans. We offer consumer loans to our customers for personal, family and household purposes, including auto, boat, and personal installment loans.

We believe we have a strong team of consumer and commercial bankers to execute on our client-centered, relationship-driven banking model. Our commercial banking team consists of experienced professionals that use an advisory approach that emphasizes understanding each client’s business and offering a broad suite of loan, deposit and treasury management products and services. Our consumer banking team consists of experienced professionals that focus on knowing their individual clients in order to best meet their financial needs, offering a full complement of loan, deposit and online banking solutions. We generally do business with clients located in the areas served by our branches, and we focus our marketing efforts on these areas.

​

3

Deposit Products, Treasury Services, and Other Funding Sources

We offer our customers a variety of deposit products and services, including checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, time deposit accounts, and treasury and merchant services, through multiple channels, including our network of 251 full-service branches, as of December 31, 2024, and our online, mobile and telephone banking platforms. As of December 31, 2024, our deposit portfolio was comprised of 27% noninterest-bearing deposits and 73% interest bearing deposits. We intend to continue our efforts to provide funding for our business from customer relationship deposits.

Deposit flows are significantly influenced by general and local economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates, internal pricing decisions and competition. Our deposits are primarily obtained from depositors located around our branch footprint, and we believe that we have attractive opportunities to capture additional retail and commercial deposits in our markets. In order to attract and retain deposits, we rely on providing quality service, offering a suite of retail and commercial products and services and introducing new products and services that meet our customers’ needs as they evolve.

In addition to traditional banking activities and the other products and services specified above, we provide a broad array of financial services to our customers, including debit card and mobile services, funds transfer products and services, and treasury management services, including merchant services, automated clearing house services, lock-box services, remote deposit capture services and other treasury services.

Correspondent Banking and Capital Markets

We operate a correspondent banking and capital markets business division through the Bank and through SouthState|DuncanWilliams, the Bank’s broker dealer subsidiary acquired in February 2021. This line of business’s primary revenue generating activities are related to the capital markets division, which includes commissions earned on fixed income security sales, fees from hedging services, loan brokerage fees and consulting fees for services related to these activities; and its correspondent banking division, which includes spread income earned on correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and correspondent bank checking account deposits and fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, asset/liability consulting related activities, international wires, and other clearing and corporate checking account services. The fees derived from the correspondent banking services are less volatile than those generated through the capital markets group. The customer base includes small to medium size financial institutions located throughout the United States.

Wealth Management

Through the Bank and SouthState Advisory, Inc., we offer wealth management and other fiduciary and private banking services targeted to affluent clients, including individuals, business owners, families, and professional service companies. In addition to fiduciary and investment management fee income, we believe these services enable us to build new relationships and expand existing relationships to grow our deposits and loans. Through our wealth management line of business, we offer financial planning, retirement services and trust and investment management for affluent clients as well as clients with more modest resources. We offer a wide range of investment alternatives, including certificates of deposits, mutual funds, annuities, individual retirement accounts, money market accounts and other financial products.

Mortgage Banking

We have a mortgage line of business that originates single-family home loans and either sells into the secondary market or holds in our portfolio those mortgages. We retain servicing rights for those loans we hold in our portfolio and for the majority of the loans that are sold.

​

4

Acquisition Strategy

Our business growth, profitability and market share have been enhanced by engaging in strategic mergers and acquisitions either within or contiguous to our existing footprint. Our acquisition strategy focuses on banking institutions that:

​

We expect to continue to assess future opportunities of financial companies using these criteria, based on market and other conditions.

Competition

Our profitability depends principally on our ability to compete effectively in the markets in which we conduct business. In the financial services industry, market demands, technological and regulatory changes and economic pressures have increased competition among banks, as well as other financial institutions. Competition may further intensify as additional companies enter the markets where we conduct business, and we enter mature markets in accordance with our expansion strategy.

​

We experience strong competition from both bank and non-bank competitors. We compete with national banks, super-regional banks, smaller community banks, nontraditional internet-based banks, credit unions, insurance companies and government sponsored entities. We also compete with other financial intermediaries and investment alternatives such as mortgage companies, credit card issuers, leasing companies, finance companies, money market mutual funds, brokerage firms, governmental and corporation bonds, and other securities firms.

​

We encounter strong competition in making loans and attracting deposits. We compete with other financial institutions to offer customers competitive interest rates on deposit accounts, competitive interest rates charged on loans and other credit products and reasonable service charges. In addition, we also compete based on the quality and scope of the services we provide and the convenience of our banking facilities, compared to our competitors. The larger national and super-regional banks may have significantly greater lending limits and may offer additional products. However, by emphasizing customer service and by providing a wide variety of services, we believe that our Bank has generally been able to compete successfully with our competitors, regardless of their size.

​

Technological advances have made it possible for our competitors, including nonbank competitors, to offer products and services that traditionally were banking products and for financial institutions and other companies to provide electronic and internet-based financial solutions, including online deposit accounts, electronic payment processing and marketplace lending, without having a physical presence where their customers are located. In addition, many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive federal regulations that govern bank holding companies and federally insured banks. In many cases, our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits and offer certain services that we do not currently provide.

​

Legislation has continued to heighten the competitive environment in which financial institutions must conduct their business, and the potential for competition among financial institutions of all types has increased significantly. To compete, we rely upon specialized services, responsive handling of customer needs, and personal contacts by our officers, directors, and staff.

​

5

Human Capital Management

We consider our relationship with our employees instrumental to the success of our business. We value our employees by investing in a healthy work-life balance, competitive compensation and benefit packages, and a team-oriented environment centered on professional service and open communication amongst employees. The Board of Directors oversees the strategic management of our human capital resources. The Human Resources Department’s day-to-day responsibility is managing our human capital resources.

Core Values and Culture

A strategic priority for the Company is to develop a dynamic, high performing team by, in part, facilitating a culture that increases employee engagement, devotes resources to recruiting, developing, and retaining talent, and recognizes the benefits of different perspectives and experiences. The Company’s core values, an essential cultural cornerstone, set the course by which we intend to meet this goal through our interactions with each other, our customers, and our suppliers:

​

Because we recognize the importance of encouraging an environment that inspires our employees to act consistently with the Company’s core values, our management-level Culture Council is charged with overseeing the internal and external culture and values messaging, implementing a program for continuing to build and retain a diverse and inclusive employee base, developing a program to recruit, train and retain the leadership and talent necessary to deliver the Company’s vision, and maintaining an employee engagement program with clear objectives.

​

The Company’s Code of Ethics, which also addresses conflicts of interest and self-dealing, applies to all directors, officers, and employees, each of whom are expected to adhere to it in every transaction. The Company believes that each employee is entitled to work in an atmosphere and environment free of discrimination and unlawful harassment. As a result, the Company has established and communicated to all employees a reporting structure for reporting incidents of harassment or discrimination. The Company’s Whistleblower hotline, which is located on our website and governed by our Whistleblower Policy, provides employees, customers, vendors and others with a confidential mechanism to express concerns or complaints regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters, securities law compliance, or any provision of federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. Other complaints or concerns, such as relating to human resources matters, may also be submitted confidentially through the whistleblower process, and any such matters are referred to our Human Resources Department or other departments, as appropriate, for resolution. Reporting on whistleblower complaints are reviewed by the Audit Committee of the Board.

​

6

Demographic Information

As of December 31, 2024, we had 4,986 full-time employees (compared to 5,070 as of the same date in 2023) and 174 part-time team members. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 96% of our team members are located in the Bank’s six-state branch footprint of South Carolina (32.5%), Florida (32%), Georgia (16.8%), North Carolina (6.9%), Alabama (5.9%) and Virginia (1.6%). To date, none of our team members are covered by collective bargaining agreements and all team members live in the United States. During fiscal year 2024, we hired 576 team members, and our voluntary turnover rate was 9% for all team members and 0.8% for management-level team members in 2024. Additional workforce demographics by gender, race or ethnicity and generation as of December 31, 2024, are reflected in the graphics below.

​

Corporate Stewardship

We are committed to equality, inclusion and workplace diversity, and we focus on understanding, accepting, and valuing the differences between people. Our Director of Corporate Stewardship reports to the CEO and bears primary responsibility for overseeing and directing strategic initiatives related to enterprise diversity, environmental and social governance, community development, management development, and the Employee Sunshine Fund.

In 2021, the Company adopted a three-year strategic plan built around three goals:

In addition, the Company formed the Corporate Stewardship Council to provide oversight to its diversity and inclusion strategy, support the implementation of diversity and inclusion initiatives that align with its vision and core values, and promote a diverse and inclusive workplace that represents the communities in which the Bank does business. The Council is responsible for identifying and addressing barriers that impact recruitment, retention and advancement of diverse candidates, defining metrics around diverse talent acquisition and retention, and identifying and implementing implicit bias training for all Company employees and directors.

​

7

In 2022, we focused primarily on implementing our three-year plan, which included engaging leadership, developing trust with local market leadership, having meaningful conversations, assisting stakeholders in viewing diversity from a number of perspectives, and establishing a small working group to help develop programs, initiatives, and training in support of the action items outlined in the three-year strategic plan. In 2023, in collaboration with our Corporate Learning Department, we implemented unconscious bias training throughout the Company which has been completed by our Board, over 600 leaders, and a significant portion of our employee population.

In 2024, we established a dashboard to track metrics related to representation, internal talent mobility, voluntary versus involuntary turnover, and recruitment. These metrics allow the Company to monitor recruitment, development, and retention of diverse talent, identify gaps, create opportunities for team members, and develop talent throughout the enterprise. Additionally, in 2024, the corporate stewardship team launched SouthState Connects Team Member Network Groups, starting with the Women’s Network Group, Women in Technology Network Group, and Military/Veterans Network Groups. These groups are designed to promote mentoring and networking relationships for employees to bolster professional development opportunities.

Talent Acquisition, Retention, and Employee Development

Recruitment is an essential part of managing our human capital resources. We seek to hire well-qualified employees who are also a good fit for our value system. Through our commercial banking internships and management training programs, we recruit from a talented, diverse pool of students from local colleges and universities. To complement other recruitment efforts, our Talent Acquisition team is committed to attending job fairs hosted by Historical Black Colleges and Universities within our footprint. Additionally, the Talent Acquisition team partners closely with regional line of business leadership to network and recruit in-market, experienced and diverse talent in metropolitan markets within our footprint who bring with them a requisite skill set, professional background and aptitude to help grow the Bank and position our teams to support and lead a larger financial institution in the future.

We encourage and support the growth and development of our employees and, when possible, seek to fill positions by promotion and transfer from within the organization. We invest in the growth and development of our employees by providing opportunities to participate in continuing education courses that are relevant to the banking industry and their job function within the Company. Our internal Corporate Learning University offers a suite of leadership development programs to support various levels of leadership experience and expertise with graduated topics designed to engage and develop leaders by improving business acumen and offering 360-degree reviews, individual coaching opportunities and education on topics as varied as culture, communication styles and mentoring. Because the banking industry is highly regulated, we also require employees to complete annual compliance training, the classes for which are selected based on each employee’s actual job responsibilities. In 2024, in the aggregate, our employees completed over 200,000 Company-provided training courses, including compliance-related courses that were assigned based on job roles and responsibilities.

Employee retention helps us operate efficiently. We believe that we offer competitive salaries, and many of our officers and key employees participate in the Company’s incentive program, which offers short-term cash incentives to reward annual performance and long-term incentives designed to reward sustainable shareholder value creation and encourage talent retention. In addition, we provide many of our employees with a comprehensive employee benefit program that includes: group life, health, dental and vision insurance; prescription benefits; flexible spending accounts; educational opportunities; an employee stock purchase plan; deferred compensation plans for officers and key employees; and a 401(k) plan with a Company match. The Company sponsors a broad leave plan that may be used for vacation, personal use and illness of employees and their immediate family members, and it awards paid leave based on tenure of service and title. The Company-sponsored Employee Stock Purchase Plan encourages our employees to invest in the Company by offering shares at a discounted price to participants.

Employee Health, Wellness and Safety

The safety and health of our employees is a top priority. To raise awareness of good health habits, the Company offers employees a robust wellness program that provides extensive wellness resources to include on-site biometric screenings and a health risk assessment program. The Company also provides support through wellness resources and the Employee Assistance Program for mental and financial wellness. Because we value supporting employees that require or prefer work location flexibility, approximately 27% of our employees work effectively from remote locations.

8

Oversight of Corporate Stewardship Matters

The Governance and Nominating Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors oversees the Company’s current and emerging environmental, corporate stewardship, and governance matters that are relevant to the business, operations, or public image of the Company or that are otherwise pertinent to the Company and its shareholders, employees, customers, and parties with whom it does business. The Company issues a Corporate Social Responsibility Report on an annual basis, which highlights the Company’s environmental and corporate stewardship initiatives, including the Company’s commitment to: building vibrant communities where we operate and where our customers live and work; fostering a strong culture that supports and encourages a diverse and inclusive workforce; promoting the highest ethical standards and acting as good stewards; and being environmentally resourceful as we support efficient and sustainable practices. Our commitment to our communities, colleagues, corporate stewardship, and the environment will inform our Company’s actions as we strive to meet our vision: investing in the entrepreneurial spirit, pursuing excellence, and inspiring a greater purpose. During 2024, we continued to build out our transition and climate risk programs, actively working toward developing the necessary structure to understand the Bank’s direct and indirect greenhouse gas scopes and emissions across the Company and to develop a process for undertaking climate risk assessments. A copy of the Company’s 2024 Corporate Social Responsibility Report is available on the Bank’s website at 2024 Corporate Social Responsibility Report.

Effect of Governmental Policies

Our earnings and business are and will be affected by the policies of various regulatory authorities of the United States, especially the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, among other things, seeks to influence interest rates and the supply of money and credit within the United States. Among the traditional methods that have been used to achieve this objective are open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate for bank borrowings, expanded access to funds for non-banks and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. The Federal Reserve steeply increased the size of its balance sheet by buying securities in 2020-2021, and since then tapered such purchases and now is gradually reducing its balance sheet, and since the financial crisis has paid interest on excess reserves held by banks at the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve decreased its target federal funds rate three times during 2024 to 4.25% to 4.50%. Both the traditional and more recent methods are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, interest rates on loans and securities, and rates paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve are influenced by various factors, including inflation, unemployment, and short-term and long-term changes in the international trade balance and in the fiscal policies of the U.S. Government. Future monetary policies, including whether and when the Federal Reserve will increase or decrease the federal funds rate and whether or at what pace it will reduce or increase the size of its balance sheet, and the effect of such policies on the future business and earnings of the Company and our subsidiary bank cannot be predicted.

Supervision and Regulation

We are extensively regulated under federal and state law. The following is a brief summary of certain aspects of that regulation that are material to us and does not purport to be a complete description of all regulations that affect us or all aspects of those regulations. To the extent particular statutory and regulatory provisions are described, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised at both the state and federal levels. The likelihood and timing of any changes in these laws and regulations, and the impact such changes may have on the Company and the Bank, are difficult to ascertain. In addition to laws and regulations, bank regulatory agencies may issue policy statements, interpretive letters and similar written guidance applicable to the Company or the Bank. A change in applicable laws, regulations or regulatory guidance, or in the manner such laws, regulations or regulatory guidance are interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s business, operations, and earnings. Supervision, regulation, and examination of banks by regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and customers, the deposit insurance fund and the U.S. banking and financial system rather than shareholders.

​

9

Both the scope of the laws and regulations and the intensity of the supervision to which we are subject have increased in recent years, initially in response to the financial crisis, and more recently in light of other factors such as the banking turmoil in early 2023 and technological and market changes. As described in further detail below, the Company and the Bank have become subject to additional regulatory requirements as a result of the growth of their assets. Regulatory enforcement and fines have also increased across the banking and financial services sector. Many of these changes occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and its implementing regulations. While there have been some changes in the post financial crisis framework applicable to the Company, the Company expects that its business will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision. The scope of regulation and the intensity of supervision will likely lessen under the current presidential administration, including less scrutiny, supervisory discouragement or possible denials of bank mergers and acquisitions by federal bank regulators.

We are also subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, both as administered by the SEC, as well as the rules of NYSE that apply to companies with securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Pause on Major Federal Reserve Rulemakings

​

In January 2025, the Federal Reserve stated that Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr would step down from the position, effective, February 28, 2025. The Federal Reserve stated that it will not issue any major rulemakings from the time of the announcement until a new vice chair for supervision is confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

Regulation of the Company

We are registered as a bank holding company with the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHC Act”) and have elected to be a financial holding company. As a financial holding company, we are subject to comprehensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Federal Reserve and are subject to its regulatory reporting requirements. Federal law subjects financial holding companies, such as the Company, to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations.

As a financial holding company, we are permitted to engage in, and be affiliated with companies engaging in, a broader range of activities than those permitted for a bank holding company. Bank holding companies are generally restricted to engaging in the business of banking, managing or controlling banks and certain other activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be related closely to banking. Financial holding companies may also engage in activities that are considered to be financial in nature, as well as those incidental or complementary to financial activities, including certain insurance underwriting activities. We and the Bank must each remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” and the Bank must receive a Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) rating of at least “Satisfactory” at its most recent examination in order for us to maintain our status as a financial holding company. In addition, the Federal Reserve has the power to order a financial holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary of that financial holding company.

A financial holding company is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank and to maintain resources adequate to support its bank. The term “source of financial strength” has been defined as the ability of a company to provide financial assistance to its insured depository institution subsidiaries in the event of financial distress. The appropriate federal banking agency for the depository institution (in this case the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or “OCC”) may require reports from the Company to assess its ability to serve as a source of strength and to enforce compliance with the source-of-strength requirements by requiring the holding company to provide financial assistance to the Bank if its capital were to become impaired. If the Company fails to provide such assistance within three months, it could be ordered to sell its stock of the Bank to cover the deficiency. Any capital loans by the Company to the Bank would be subordinate in right of payment to deposits and certain other debts of the Bank. In the event of the Company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the Company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of the Bank would be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.

​

10

The BHC Act requires that a financial holding company obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any additional bank or bank holding company, (ii) taking any action that causes an additional bank or bank holding company to become a subsidiary of the financial holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company. The Federal Reserve may not approve any such transaction that would result in a monopoly or would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any section of the United States, or the effect of which may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly in any section of the country, or that in any other manner would be in restraint of trade, unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider (1) the financial and managerial resources of the companies involved, including pro forma capital ratios; (2) the risk to the stability of the United States banking or financial system; (3) the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including the companies’ performance under the CRA; and (4) the effectiveness of the companies in combatting money laundering. We are permitted under applicable federal and state law to make out-of-state acquisitions and mergers of other banks and bank holding companies, subject to the requirements summarized above.

Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company and a bank that a person may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. The overall effect of such laws is to make it more difficult to acquire a bank holding company and a bank by tender offer or similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, shareholders of the Company may be less likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender offers or similar efforts to acquire control of other companies. Federal law also imposes restrictions on acquisitions of stock in a bank holding company or a national bank. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act and the regulations thereunder, a person or group must give advance notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of any bank holding company, such as the Company, and the OCC before acquiring control of any national bank, such as the Bank. Upon receipt of such notice, the bank regulatory agencies may approve or disapprove the acquisition. The Change in Bank Control Act creates a rebuttable presumption of control if a member or group acquires a certain percentage or more of a bank holding company’s or bank’s voting stock, or if one or more other control factors set forth in the Act are present. As a result, a person or entity generally must provide prior notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring the power to vote 10% or more of our outstanding common stock. Investors should be aware of these requirements when acquiring shares of our stock.

Regulation of the Bank

The Bank is a national bank subject to comprehensive regulation, examination and supervision by the OCC and is subject to its regulatory reporting requirements. The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC and, accordingly, the Bank is also subject to certain FDIC regulations and the FDIC has backup examination authority and some enforcement powers over the Bank. The Bank also is subject to certain Federal Reserve regulations. These regulations include limitations on loans to a single borrower and to its directors, officers and employees; restrictions on the opening and closing of branch offices; the maintenance of required capital and liquidity ratios; the granting of credit under equal and fair conditions; the disclosure of the costs and terms of such credit, requirements to maintain reserves against deposits and loans, limitation on the types of investment that may be made and requirements governing risk management practices.

The Bank also is subject to restrictions on its ability to lend to and engage in other transactions with the Company and the Bank’s other affiliates. Under these provisions, individual loans or other extensions of credit between the Bank and the Company or any nonbank affiliate generally are limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital and surplus, and all such transactions between the Bank and either the Company or any nonbank affiliate are limited to 20% of the Bank’s capital and surplus. Loans and other extensions of credit from the Bank to any affiliate generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts. In addition, any transaction between the Bank and any affiliate is required to be on arm’s length terms and conditions. The definition of “extension of credit” for these purposes includes credit exposures arising from a derivative transaction, a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement and a securities lending or borrowing transaction. Federal banking laws also place similar restrictions on loans and other extensions of credit by FDIC-insured banks, such as the Bank, to their directors, executive officers and principal shareholders. These restrictions have not had a material impact on the Company or the Bank.

​

11

Federal Reserve rules require depository institutions, such as the Bank, to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts, primarily NOW and regular checking accounts. Effective March 26, 2020, the reserve was suspended with no reserve requirements. These reserve requirements are subject to annual adjustment by the Federal Reserve.

The Bank is permitted under federal law to branch on a de novo basis across state lines where the laws of the state would permit banks chartered by that state to open a de novo branch.

In 2024, the OCC adopted a final rule amending its procedures for reviewing applications under the Bank Merger Act (“BMA”) and adding a policy statement on the OCC’s substantive approach to evaluating bank mergers under the BMA. The policy statement outlines the general principles the OCC will apply when reviewing bank merger applications and clarifies how the OCC would consider the statutory factors under the BMA. The policy statement identifies certain indicators that are more likely to withstand scrutiny and be approved expeditiously and those that would raise supervisory or regulatory concerns. Indicators generally consistent with timely approval, include, among others, appropriate capital and supervisory ratings, lack of enforcement or fair lending actions, lack of significant CRA or consumer compliance concerns or significant adverse effect on competition. One indicator for approval is that the resulting institution would have total assets less than $50 billion, which the Company exceeds as a result of the merger with IBTX. The final rule became effective on January 1, 2025. The Company does not believe the rule will have a material impact on the Company’s strategy.

In September 2024, the Department of Justice (the "DOJ”) withdrew its 1995 Bank Merger Guidelines and issued the 2024 Banking Addendum to 2023 Merger Guidelines (the “2024 Banking Addendum”). The DOJ clarified that it will assess competition considerations in connection with bank and bank holding company mergers using its 2023 Merger Guidelines, which is the general merger review framework the DOJ now uses to evaluate transactions in all segments of the economy, and 2024 Banking Addendum. The 2024 Banking Addendum provides guidance on how the DOJ will assess competition in the context of bank and bank holding company mergers. An analysis under the 2023 Merger Guidelines and 2024 Banking Addendum may include consideration of theories of harm and relevant markets not considered under the 1995 Bank Merger Guidelines, which focused primarily on concentrations of deposits and branches.

As a result as a result of IBTX’s merger into the Company, the Bank grew above $50 billion in assets as of January 1, 2025, and thus will become subject, effective the fourth quarter of 2026, to the OCC’s heightened standards guidelines. These guidelines set expectations for the governance and risk management practices of large depository institutions subject to its supervision with more than $50 billion in assets. The guidelines require such institutions to establish and adhere to a written governance framework in order to manage and control their risk-taking activities and to incorporate their risk appetite statement and concentration risk limits into capital and liquidity stress testing and planning processes.

Supervision, Examination and Enforcement

The Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC have broad supervisory, examination and enforcement authority with regard to bank holding companies and banks, including the power to impose nonpublic supervisory agreements, issue cease and desist or removal orders, impose fines and other civil and criminal penalties, initiate injunctive actions, terminate deposit insurance and appoint a conservator or receiver. In general, these actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations, as well as engagement in unsafe and unsound practices, and certain of these actions also may be taken against an “institution affiliated party” as defined in the law. Specifically, the regulators may direct a bank holding company or bank to, among other things, increase its capital, sell subsidiaries or other assets, limit its dividends and distributions, restrict its growth or remove officers and directors. Supervision and examinations are confidential, and the outcomes of these actions may not be made public.

We also are supervised and examined by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) with respect to consumer protection laws and regulations.

​

12

FDIC Insurance Assessments and Depositor Preference

The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC up to the limits under applicable law, which currently are set at $250,000 for accounts under the same name and title. The Bank is subject to deposit insurance premium assessments. The FDIC imposes a risk-based deposit premium assessment system. Under this system, the assessment rates for an insured depository institution vary according to the level of risk incurred in its activities. To arrive at an assessment rate for a banking institution, the FDIC places it in one of four risk categories determined by reference to its capital levels and supervisory ratings. In the case of those institutions in the lowest risk category, the FDIC further determines its assessment rate based on certain specified financial ratios or, if applicable, long-term debt ratings. The assessment rate schedule can change from time to time, at the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits. Under the current system, premiums are assessed quarterly. The FDIC has published guidelines on the adjustment of assessment rates for certain institutions.

The FDIC uses a performance score and loss-severity score to calculate the Bank’s initial FDIC assessment rate. In calculating these scores, the FDIC uses the Bank’s capital level and regulatory supervisory ratings and certain financial measures to assess the Bank’s ability to withstand asset-related and funding related stress, and make certain adjustments based on risk factors that are not adequately captured in these calculations.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by a bank’s federal regulatory agency. Deposits and certain claims for administrative expenses and employee compensation against insured depository institutions are afforded a priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution, including federal funds and letters of credit, in the liquidation or other resolution of that institution by any receiver appointed by federal authorities. These priority creditors include the FDIC.

In response to the bank failures in early 2023, the FDIC implemented a special assessment to recover the losses to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund at an annual rate of approximately 13.4 basis points over eight quarterly assessment periods beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2024. The base for the special assessment is equal to an insured depository institution’s estimated uninsured deposits reported as of December 31, 2022, adjusted to exclude the first $5 billion. The FDIC will collect the special assessment over an initial eight-quarter collection period, which began in the second quarter of 2024, and currently projects that the special assessment will be collected for an additional two quarters beyond the initial eight-quarter collection period, at a lower rate, subject to change depending on any adjustments to the loss estimate, mergers or failures, or amendments to reported estimates of uninsured deposits. As a result, the total estimated FDIC special assessment allocable to the Bank is approximately $30.2 million. The FDIC may impose additional special assessments from time to time based on the actual losses incurred by the FDIC as a result of the March 2023 bank failures or future failures.

​

Resolution Planning

​

In June 2024, the FDIC released a final rule amending its requirements for insured depository institutions with

more than $50 billion in assets to develop and submit plans demonstrating how they could be resolved in an orderly and timely manner in the event of receivership. As a result of IBTX’s merger into the Company, the Bank grew above $50 billion in assets as of January 1, 2025, and is evaluating the impact of this rule for when the Bank becomes subject to its requirements.

Dividend Restrictions

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries and has in the past relied on dividends from the Bank as its primary source of liquidity. There are limitations on the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Company, as well as by the Company to its shareholders.

​

13

The OCC has the general authority to limit the dividends paid by the Bank if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. The Bank may not pay dividends from its paid-in surplus. All dividends must be paid out of undivided profits then on hand, after deducting expenses, including reserves for losses and bad debts. In addition, a national bank, such as the Bank, is prohibited from declaring a dividend on its shares of common stock until its surplus equals its stated capital, unless there has been a transfer to surplus of no less than one/tenth of the bank’s net profits of the preceding two consecutive half-year periods (in the case of an annual dividend). The approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus.

We and the Bank must maintain the applicable common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital conservation buffer of 2.5% to avoid becoming subject to restrictions on capital distributions, including dividends. For more information on the CET1 capital conservation buffer, see Part I Item 1 “Supervision and Regulation – Capital Requirements.”

In addition, Federal Reserve policy provides that bank holding companies, such as the Company, should generally pay dividends to shareholders only if (i) the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition; and (iii) the organization will continue to meet minimum capital adequacy ratios. The policy also provides that a bank holding company should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the bank holding company’s capital structure. Bank holding companies also are required to consult with the Federal Reserve before increasing dividends or redeeming or repurchasing capital instruments. Additionally, the Federal Reserve could prohibit or limit the payment of dividends by a bank holding company if it determines that payment of the dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

Capital Requirements

We are required under federal law to maintain certain minimum capital levels at each of the Company and the Bank. The federal banking agencies have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital requirements to banking organizations they supervise. Under these requirements, the Company and the Bank are required to maintain certain capital standards based on ratios of capital to total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. The requirements also define the weights assigned to assets and off-balance sheet items to determine the risk-weighted asset components of the risk-based capital rules. The required capital ratios are minimums, and the Federal Reserve and OCC may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of capital in order to operate in a safe and sound manner. Risks such as concentration of credit risks and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as the institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates, and an institution’s ability to manage those risks are important factors that are to be taken into account by the federal banking agencies in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy.

​

Under the applicable capital rules, the Company and the Bank are subject to the following risk-based capital ratios: a CET1 risk-based capital ratio, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, which includes CET1 and additional Tier 1 capital, and a total capital ratio, which includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. CET1 is primarily comprised of the sum of common stock instruments and related surplus net of treasury stock, retained earnings, and certain qualifying minority interests, less certain adjustments and deductions, including with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets subject to temporary timing differences. Additional Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, tier 1 minority interests and grandfathered trust preferred securities, if applicable.

​

​

14

Tier 2 capital consists of instruments disqualified from Tier 1 capital, including qualifying subordinated debt, certain trust preferred securities, other preferred stock and certain hybrid capital instruments, and a limited amount of loan loss reserves up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, subject to certain eligibility criteria. The Company’s trust preferred securities and subordinated debentures qualify as Tier 2 capital. For institutions, such as us, that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available for sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values are also included in Tier 2 capital. The capital rules also define the risk-weights assigned to assets and off-balance sheet items to determine the risk-weighted asset components of the risk-based capital rules, including, for example, “high volatility” commercial real estate, past due assets, structured securities and equity holdings.

​

The capital rules require a minimum CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%, a minimum overall Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0%. In addition, the capital rules require a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% above each of the minimum capital ratio requirements (CET1, Tier 1, and total risk-based capital), which must be met for a bank or bank holding company to be able to pay dividends, engage in share buybacks or make discretionary bonus payments to executive management without automatic restriction. The capital conservation buffer is 2.50%, so a banking organization needs to maintain a CET1 capital ratio of at least 7%, a total Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8.5% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.5% or it would be subject to restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to its executive management.

​

The leverage capital ratio, which serves as a minimum capital standard, is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total assets, less goodwill and other disallowed intangible assets. The required minimum leverage ratio for all banks and bank holding companies is 4%.

To be well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain the following capital ratios:

​

The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for bank holding companies to reflect the higher capital requirements imposed under the current capital rules. For purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y, including determining whether a bank holding company meets the requirements to be a financial holding company, bank holding companies, such as the Company, must maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater to be well-capitalized. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a very similar well-capitalized standard to bank holding companies as that applicable to the Bank, the Company’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2024, would exceed such revised well-capitalized standard. The Federal Reserve may require bank holding companies, including the Company, to maintain capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, depending upon general economic conditions and a bank holding company’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans.

​

Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our operations or financial condition. For example, only a well-capitalized depository institution may accept brokered deposits without prior regulatory approval. Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could also result in restrictions on the Company’s or the Bank’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute capital or to receive regulatory approval of applications or other restrictions on its growth.

​

​

15

As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios were above the well-capitalized standards and met the fully phased-in capital conservation buffer. Please refer to the table below for a summary of the Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, calculated using the regulatory capital methodology applicable to us during 2024.

The Company has elected to delay for two years the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period to phase out the aggregate amount of benefit during the initial two-year delay for a total five-year transition. The estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital (modified CECL transitional amount) is calculated as the sum of the impact on retained earnings upon adoption of CECL (CECL transitional amount) and the calculated change in the ACL relative to the ACL upon adoption of CECL multiplied by a scaling factor of 25%. The scaling factor is used to approximate the difference in the ACL under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The modified CECL transitional amount was calculated each quarter for the first two years of the five-year transition. This amount was fixed as of December 31, 2021, and the Company began the three-year phase out period with 25% of the total CECL transitional amount being phased out in 2022 and 2023. The three-year phase-in period ended at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately $15.3 million and $30.5 million, respectively, was added to Tier 1 capital at the Company and Bank as a result of the modified CECL transition. Had the Company elected not to apply the modified CECL transitional amount to its Tier 1 capital, the Company and Bank would have still been considered well capitalized as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

On July 27, 2023, the banking agencies released a proposed rule to implement major changes to the capital rules for banking organizations with $100 billion or more in assets intended to bring the U.S. capital rules into conformance with the current international capital standards issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“Basel Framework”). It is expected that the proposal, if enacted as proposed, would significantly increase capital requirements for banking organizations with $100 billion or more in assets, which could indirectly impact smaller institutions, such as the Company and the Bank, if larger banking organizations make changes in response to the increased capital requirements. It is uncertain if and when a final rule will be adopted, and if so, whether and to what extent it will differ from the rule proposal. As a result, the timing and content of any final rule, and the potential effects of any final rule on the Company and the Bank, remains uncertain.

​

16

Safety and Soundness Guidelines

The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards relating to internal controls, risk management, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. These guidelines in general require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage specified risks and exposures. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and characterize compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer or employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the agencies have adopted regulations that authorize but do not require an agency to order an institution that has been given notice by the agency that it is not in compliance with any of the safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, the agency must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types, including those that may limit growth or capital distributions.

Lending Standards and Guidance

The federal banking agencies have adopted uniform regulations prescribing standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens or interests in real estate or made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate. Under these regulations, all insured depository institutions, such as the Bank, must adopt and maintain written policies establishing appropriate limits and standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens or interests in real estate or are made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate. These policies must establish loan portfolio diversification standards, prudent underwriting standards (including loan-to-value limits) that are clear and measurable, loan administration procedures, and documentation, approval and reporting requirements. The real estate lending policies must reflect consideration of the federal bank regulators’ Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies.

The federal banking agencies have also jointly issued guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “Guidance”), which defines commercial real estate loans as exposures secured by raw land, land development and construction (including 1-4 family residential construction), multi-family property, and non-farm nonresidential property where the primary or a significant source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property (that is, loans for which 50% or more of the source of repayment comes from third-party, non-affiliated, rental income) or the proceeds of the sale, refinancing, or permanent financing of the property. The Guidance requires that appropriate processes be in place to identify, monitor and control risks associated with real estate lending concentrations. If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices that address key elements, including board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending. The required heightened risk management practices could include enhanced strategic planning, underwriting policies, risk management, internal controls, portfolio stress testing and risk exposure limits as well as appropriately designed compensation and incentive programs. Higher allowances for credit losses and capital levels may also be required. The Guidance states that the following metrics may indicate a concentration of commercial real estate loans, but that these metrics are neither limits nor a safe harbor: (1) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% or more of total risk-based capital; or (2) total reported loans secured by multi-family properties, non-farm non-residential properties (excluding those that are owner-occupied), and loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 300% or more of total risk-based capital and the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. As of December 31, 2024, our total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land were 40.9% of the Bank’s total Tier 1 capital less modified CECL transitional amount plus the allowance for credit losses (excluding reserve for unfunded commitments) and our total reported loans secured by multifamily and non-farm nonresidential properties and loans for construction, land development, and other land were 219.6% of the Bank’s total Tier 1 capital less modified CECL transitional amount plus the allowance for credit losses.

​

​

17

Consumer Protection Laws

The Bank is subject to a number of federal laws designed to protect its customers. These consumer protection laws apply to a broad range of our activities and to various aspects of our business and include laws relating to interest rates, fair lending, disclosures of credit terms and estimated transaction costs to consumer borrowers, debt collection practices, the use of and the provision of information to consumer reporting agencies, and the prohibition of unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with the offer, sale or provision of consumer financial products and services. Administration of many of these consumer protection rules are the responsibility of the CFPB, which has exclusive supervisory authority over insured depository institutions with more than $10 billion in total assets and any affiliates thereof. The CFPB also has authority to define and prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive practices in the consumer financial area, and expanded data collecting powers for purposes of determining bank compliance with the fair lending laws.

​

The CFPB has promulgated many mortgage-related final rules, including rules related to the ability to repay and qualified mortgage standards, mortgage servicing standards, loan originator compensation standards, high-cost mortgage requirements, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requirements and appraisal and escrow standards for higher priced mortgages. In addition, several proposed revisions to mortgage-related rules are pending finalization. The mortgage-related final rules issued by the CFPB have materially restructured the origination, servicing and securitization of residential mortgages in the United States. These rules have impacted, and will continue to impact, the business practices of mortgage lenders, including the Company. For example, under the CFPB’s Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage rule, before making a mortgage loan, a lender must establish that a borrower has the ability to repay the mortgage. “Qualified mortgages”, as defined in the rule, are presumed to comply with this requirement and, as a result, present less litigation risk to lenders. For a loan to qualify as a qualified mortgage, the loan must satisfy certain limits on terms and conditions, pricing and a maximum debt-to-income ratio. Loans eligible for purchase, guarantee or insurance by a government agency or government-sponsored enterprise are exempt from some of these requirements. Satisfying the qualified mortgage standards, ensuring correct calculations are made for individual loans, recordkeeping and monitoring, as well as understanding the effect of the qualified mortgage standards on CRA obligations, impose significant new compliance obligations on, and involve compliance costs for, mortgage lenders, including the Company.

Under applicable law, the Bank, as a debit card issuer, may receive a maximum permissible interchange fee equal to no more than $0.21 plus 5 basis points of the transaction value for many types of debit interchange transactions. Further, a debit card issuer may also recover $0.01 per transaction for fraud prevention purposes if the issuer complies with certain fraud-related requirements required by the Federal Reserve. In addition, the Federal Reserve rules governing routing and exclusivity require debit card issuers to offer two unaffiliated networks for routing transactions on each debit or prepaid product.

In March 2023, the CFPB issued the “Small Business Lending Rule” to implement Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act for the stated purpose of increasing transparency in small business lending, promoting economic development, and combating unlawful discrimination. Under this rule, covered lenders, including the Bank, are required to collect and report information about the small business credit applications they receive, including geographic and demographic data, lending decisions, and the price of credit. In October 2023, a federal district court issued a nationwide injunction prohibiting the CFPB from implementing or enforcing the Small Business Lending Rule pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in an appeal of a Fifth Circuit decision finding that the CFPB’s funding structure is unconstitutional. In May 2024, the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling and as a result of the proceedings, the CFPB extended all compliance dates for the Small Business Lending Rule to compensate for the period in which its implementation and enforcement of the rule was stayed by the district court. The extended compliance dates for the Small Business Lending Rule begin as early as July 2025. The Bank has been updating its systems and training its lenders to comply with this small business data collection rule, although it is unclear at this time what impact this rule may have on the Company’s financial statements.

​

18

In October 2023, the Federal Reserve released a notice of proposed rulemaking that would lower the maximum interchange fee that a large debit card issuer can receive on a debit card transaction. Under the proposal, initially the base component would decrease from 21.0 cents to 14.4 cents, the ad valorem component would decrease from 5.0 basis points to 4.0 basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction, and the fraud-prevention adjustment would increase from 1.0 cents to 1.3 cents for debit card transactions performed from the effective date of the final rule to June 30, 2025. In addition, the proposal would adopt an approach for future adjustments to the interchange fee cap, which would occur every other year based on issuer cost data gathered from large debit card issuers. We will continue to monitor the status of the proposed rule and are in the process of evaluating this proposed rulemaking and assessing the scale of its adverse impact on the Company and Bank if adopted as proposed.

​

In October 2024, the CFPB finalized a rule to implement Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which would require certain entities, including the Company and the Bank, to, among other things, make available to a consumer, upon request, information in its control or possession concerning the consumer financial product or service that the consumer obtained from that entity. In general, the rule also requires, among other things, data providers holding a consumer account, such as the Bank, to establish a developer interface satisfying certain data security specifications and other standards, through which the data provider can receive requests for, and provide, specific types of data covered by the rule in electronic, usable form to authorized third parties, including data aggregators. Under the rule, data providers are prohibited from, among other things, charging consumers or third parties fees for processing these consumer data requests. The rule also places certain data security, authorization and other obligations on third parties accessing covered data from data providers, which could include the Company and the Bank when acting in certain capacities. The rule requires third parties to limit their collection, use, and retention of the data received to only what is reasonably necessary to provide the consumers’ requested product or service. The compliance date for a depository institution data provider that holds at least $10 billion in total assets but less than $250 billion in total assets is April 1, 2027; however, the final rule is subject to ongoing litigation that could impact whether and when the Company and the Bank are required to comply with the rule. We continue to evaluate the final rule and the potential impacts on the Company and the Bank.

In December 2024, the CFPB issued a final rule that removes an exception for overdraft lending services from longstanding provisions of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and other consumer financial protection laws by requiring banks with assets greater than or equal to $10 billion to treat overdraft loans like credit cards and other loans, including providing clear disclosures, to the extent the bank charges customer fees in excess of the direct costs of providing the service or in accordance with established benchmarks by the CFPB. While the Bank is still assessing the final rule, it will likely have a material impact on the Bank by reducing revenue from overdraft lending services. In addition, in January 2024, the CFPB proposed, but has not yet finalized, a rule that would prohibit nonsufficient funds fees on transactions that financial institutions decline in real time. These types of transactions include declined debit card purchases and ATM withdrawals, as well as some declined peer-to-peer payments. While the Bank is still assessing this proposal, with the Bank’s elimination of nonsufficient funds fees in 2022, this proposed rule, if implemented as proposed, will likely have limited impact on the Bank.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA requires the appropriate federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the institution, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Furthermore, the relevant federal bank regulatory agency is required to consider a bank’s CRA assessment when considering the bank’s application to, among other things, merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of an insured depository institution or open or relocate a branch office. The relevant federal banking agency, the OCC in the Bank’s case, examines each bank and assigns it a public CRA rating. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of “outstanding,” “satisfactory,” “needs to improve,” or “unsatisfactory.” The Bank received a “satisfactory” rating at its most recent CRA evaluation.

​

19

In October 2023, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the OCC issued a final rule amending the agencies’ CRA regulations. In developing the final rule, the agencies’ objectives included the following: (i) update the CRA regulations to strengthen the achievement of the core purpose of the statute, (ii) adapt to changes in the banking industry, including the expanded role of mobile and online banking, (iii) provide greater clarity and consistency in the application of the regulations, (iv) tailor performance standards to account for differences in bank size, business models, and local conditions, (v) tailor data collection and reporting requirements and use existing data whenever possible, (vi) promote transparency and public engagement, (vii) confirm that CRA and fair lending responsibilities are mutually reinforcing, and (viii) promote a consistent regulatory approach that applies to banks regulated by all three agencies. It is anticipated that the Bank will require a material effort to update its systems as the new rule will impact several lines of business and require new compliance with data collection and reporting rules. This effort necessitates training for lenders and other stakeholders. Under the new rule, large banks will be subject to four tests versus the existing three tests, and performance evaluations will involve a more quantitative approach with complex data analytics. The Bank does expect increased expense to comply with the new rule, including expenses to enhance systems, training, and possible product enhancements.

The final rule was expected to take effect April 1, 2024, with most of its provisions becoming applicable on January 1, 2026. Compliance with data and disclosure reporting requirements will not be required until 2027. Several banking industry groups filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate the CRA final rule, in which they argued that the federal banking agencies exceeded their statutory authority in adopting the CRA final rule. In March 2024, a federal judge granted an injunction to extend the CRA final rule’s effective date, originally set for April 1, 2024. The effective date will be extended each day the injunction remains in place, pending the resolution of the lawsuit.

Anti-Money Laundering Rules

The Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, (together, the “BSA”) and its implementing regulations require financial institutions to, among other duties, implement and maintain an effective anti-money laundering (“AML”) compliance program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports when appropriate.

The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, enacted on January 1, 2021 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (“AMLA”), amends the BSA but does not directly impose new requirements on banks. However, AMLA requires the U.S. Treasury Department to, among other things, issue National Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Priorities and implementing regulations, and conduct studies and issue regulations that may, over the next few years, significantly alter certain due diligence, recordkeeping and reporting requirements that the BSA and its implementing regulations impose on banks. AMLA also contains provisions that increase penalties for violations of the BSA and includes whistleblower incentives, both of which could increase regulatory enforcement against banks. Implementation of AMLA is ongoing and is anticipated to impact the Bank’s AML compliance program.

​

In an effort to increase transparency in the U.S. financial system and prevent shell entities from being used to launder money or hide assets, AMLA includes the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”), which requires the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) to, among other things, establish a national beneficial ownership information registry. In September 2022, FinCEN issued the final Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements rule (the “BOI Reporting Rule”), which, effective January 1, 2024, requires certain “reporting companies” to file beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN that will be stored in the national beneficial ownership registry and will detail the reporting company’s beneficial owners. In December 2023, FinCEN issued the final Beneficial Ownership Information Access and Safeguards rule—the second of three rulemakings that would implement the CTA—which governs access to the national beneficial ownership registry. FinCEN has not yet issued the third CTA-implementing regulation, which will amend the beneficial ownership requirements applicable to banks and other covered financial institutions under FinCEN’s existing Customer Due Diligence (“CDD”) rule. The constitutionality of the CTA is subject to ongoing litigation, and it is not clear what impact the new rules will have on the Bank; however compliance costs will likely increase if we are required to develop enhanced CDD procedures and recalibrate customer information collection and reporting systems to effectively respond to the CTA’s new requirements.

​

20

Violations of the BSA and its implementing regulations can result in substantial civil and criminal penalties, and the federal banking agencies are required to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s AML compliance program when reviewing bank mergers and bank holding company acquisitions. In addition to the federal banking agencies, FinCEN is authorized to impose significant civil monetary penalties for violations of the BSA and its implementing regulations and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement actions with state and federal law enforcement agencies and banking regulators.

OFAC Regulation

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) is responsible for administering U.S. economic sanctions, which can which prohibit certain transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals and others. OFAC-administered sanctions take on many different forms. For example, sanctions may include: (1) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against direct or indirect imports from and exports to a sanctioned country and prohibitions on U.S. persons engaging in financial transactions relating to, making investments in, or providing investment-related advice or assistance to, a sanctioned country; and (2) blocking assets in which certain sanctioned foreign governments, entities or individuals have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including property in the possession or control of U.S. persons. OFAC also maintains a lists of designated persons, groups or entities that are the target of sanctions, including the “Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List.” The assets of designated persons, groups or entities are blocked and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing with any such persons. Moreover, blocked assets, for example property and bank deposits, cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. If we find a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer associated with a sanctioned person, we must freeze or block such account or transaction, file a blocked property report with OFAC and notify the appropriate authorities. Failure to comply with U.S. economic sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences.

Data Privacy and Cybersecurity

Various federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and standards contain extensive data privacy and cybersecurity provisions, and the legal and regulatory framework for data privacy and cybersecurity is in considerable flux and rapidly evolving. For example, current federal laws, rules, regulations and standards, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLBA”), require financial institutions to, among other things, periodically disclose their privacy policies and practices relating to sharing personal information and enable retail customers to opt out of our ability to share such personal information with unaffiliated third parties under certain circumstances. Such laws and regulations also require financial institutions to implement a comprehensive cybersecurity program that includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information. An amendment to Regulation S-P, an implementing regulation promulgated under the GLBA, was adopted by the SEC on May 16, 2024 and requires broker-dealers and registered investment advisers to, among other things, adopt and implement an incident response program as part of their formal cybersecurity policies and procedures and report data breaches to affected individuals whose sensitive customer information was, or is reasonably likely to have been, accessed or used without authorization within 30 days of becoming aware of such data breach. Other federal and state laws and regulations impact our ability to share certain information with affiliates and non-affiliates for marketing and/or non-marketing purposes, or to contact customers with marketing offers. Federal law also makes it a criminal offense, except in limited circumstances, to obtain or attempt to obtain customer information of a financial nature by fraudulent or deceptive means. The Bank is also subject to rules and regulations issued by the Federal Trade Commission, which regulates unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including with respect to data privacy and cybersecurity. Additionally, like other lenders, the Bank uses credit bureau data in its underwriting activities. Use of such data is regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which also regulates reporting information to credit bureaus, prescreening individuals for credit offers, sharing of information between affiliates, and using affiliate data for marketing purposes. Similar state laws may impose additional requirements on us and our subsidiaries. The federal government also is considering, and may pass, additional data privacy and cybersecurity legislation, to which we may become subject if passed.

The enactment of the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (the “CIRCIA”) in 2022, once rulemaking is complete, will require, among other things, certain companies to report significant cyber incidents to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (the “CISA”) within 72 hours from the time the company reasonably believes the incident occurred (and within 24 hours of making a ransom payment as a result of a ransomware attack). On April 4, 2024, the CISA proposed a rule under the CIRCIA that would clarify the scope of cyber incidents to be reported and would further define covered entities subject to CIRCIA to expressly include companies in the financial services industry that are required to report cyber incidents to their primary federal regulators.

21

We also are subject to federal regulations that, among other things, require a banking organization to notify its primary federal regulators as soon as possible and within 36 hours after identifying a “computer-security incident” that has materially disrupted or degraded, or the banking organization believes in good faith is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade its business or operations in a manner that would, among other things, jeopardize the viability of its operations, result in customers being unable to access their deposit and other accounts, result in a material loss of revenue, profit or franchise value, or pose a threat to the financial stability of the U.S. financial sector. Additionally, the federal banking regulators, as well as the SEC and related self-regulatory organizations, regularly issue guidance regarding cybersecurity that is intended to enhance cyber risk management among financial institutions.

Data privacy and cybersecurity are also areas of increasing state legislative focus. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (collectively, the “CCPA”), among other things, gives California residents the right to request access to or correct personal information collected about them, and whether that personal information has been sold or shared with others, the right to request deletion of personal information (subject to certain exceptions), the right to opt out of certain sharing and sales of their personal information, and the right not to be discriminated against for exercising these rights. The CCPA contains several exemptions, including that many, but not all, requirements of the CCPA are inapplicable to personal information that is collected, sold, disclosed or otherwise processed subject to certain federal laws, including the GLBA. Similar laws have been or may be adopted by other states where we do business or collect personal information. In addition, laws in all 50 U.S. states generally require businesses to provide notice under certain circumstances to individuals whose personal information has been disclosed as a result of a data breach.

For further information regarding the risks associated with data privacy and cybersecurity laws, please see Part I – Item 1A – Risk Factors – “We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity, which could increase the cost of doing business, compliance risks and potential liability” and “We face cybersecurity risks from cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents that could result in the disclosure of confidential and other information (including personal information), adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.”

Broker Dealer and Investment Adviser Regulation

Our broker dealer subsidiary and investment adviser subsidiary are subject to regulation by the SEC. FINRA is the primary self-regulatory organization for our registered broker-dealer subsidiary. The broker dealer and investment adviser subsidiaries also are subject to additional regulation by states or local jurisdictions. The SEC and FINRA have active enforcement functions that oversee broker dealers and investment advisers and can bring actions that result in fines, restitution, a limitation on permitted activities, disqualification to continue to conduct certain activities and an inability to rely on certain favorable exemptions. Certain types of infractions and violations also can affect the Company’s ability to issue new securities expeditiously. In addition, certain changes in the activities of a broker dealer require approval from FINRA, and FINRA takes into account a variety of considerations in acting upon applications for such approval, including internal controls, capital levels, management experience and quality, prior enforcement and disciplinary history, and supervisory concerns.

Future Legislation and Regulation

Banking statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by Congress, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. In addition to laws and regulations, state and federal bank regulatory agencies may issue policy statements, interpretive letters and similar written guidance applicable to us and our subsidiaries. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulation or the application of those laws or regulations, although enactment of any significant proposal could affect how we operate and could significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of internal business processes or limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

​

22

Availability of Reports Furnished or Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

We make available at no cost all of our reports filed electronically with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and the annual proxy statement, as well as amendments to those reports, through the Investor Relations page of our website at www.SouthStatebank.com. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

We also will provide without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K to any shareholder by mail. Requests should be sent to SouthState Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1101 First Street South, Winter Haven, Florida 33880.

Information with respect to the Company’s Board of Directors, Executive Officers and corporate governance policies and principles is presented on the Company’s website, www.SouthStatebank.com, on the Investor Relations page. We encourage our employees to take initiative and be responsible for their actions. We have implemented a Whistleblower program and adopted a Code of Ethics, and information about both is available under Corporate Overview/Governance Documents on the Investor Relations page of our website located at www.SouthStatebank.com. We also adopted a formal corporate governance policy, a copy of which is available under Corporate Overview/Governance Documents/Corporate Governance Guidelines on the Investor Relations page of our website located at www.SouthStatebank.com.

23

Risks relating to the Regulatory Environment:

Risks relating to our Common Stock:

24

Risks relating to Economic Conditions and Other Outside Forces:

Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. The following discussion highlights the risks that management believes are material for our Company, but do not necessarily include all the risks that we may face. You should carefully consider the risk factors and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Report”) in evaluating an investment in our common stock.

Risks relating to our Business and Business Strategy

We face risks and uncertainties related to our Merger with IBTX.

The Company and IBTX entered into the IBTX Merger Agreement with the expectation that the Merger would result in various synergies including, among other things, benefits relating to enhanced revenues, a strengthened and expanded market position for the combined organization in Texas, entry into the Colorado market, technology efficiencies, cost savings and operating efficiencies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the Merger is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether the Company integrates the institutions in an efficient and effective manner, as well as general competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to achieve or delays in achieving these anticipated benefits could result in a share price reduction as well as increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues, and diversion of management’s time and energy could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects.

Furthermore, while the IBTX Merger closed January 1, 2025, there is no assurance that the businesses of the Company and IBTX can be integrated successfully. The success of the Merger will depend on, among other things, the ability of the Company and IBTX to combine their businesses in a manner that facilitates growth and business opportunities and realizes cost savings. If the combined company is not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.

​

25

The Company may not be able to integrate successfully the companies or to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger.

On January 1, 2025, the Company and IBTX combined in a merger, but the systems and operational conversion will occur in the second quarter of 2025. The successful integration of systems and operations will depend substantially on the Company’s ability to consolidate successfully corporate cultures, management teams, operations, systems, processes and procedures and to eliminate redundancies and costs. While we have substantial experience in successfully integrating institutions we have acquired, we may encounter difficulties during integration, such as:

Integration activities could divert resources from regular operations. General market and economic conditions or governmental actions affecting the financial industry generally also may inhibit the Company’s successful integration of these entities.

The Company will continue to incur substantial expenses related to the IBTX Merger and the integration.

​

The Company must integrate IBTX’s processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems. In addition, the IBTX Merger may increase the Company’s compliance and legal risks, including increased litigation or regulatory actions such as fines or restrictions related to the business practices or operations of the combined business, including its expanded presence in Texas and Colorado. While the Company has assumed that a certain level of expenses would be incurred in connection with the merger and integration of IBTX, many factors beyond the Company’s control could affect the total amount or the timing of these merger and integration expenses. Moreover, many of the expenses that the Company will incur are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the expected savings from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale. The amount and timing of future charges to earnings as a result of merger or integration expenses are uncertain.

​

We may not realize the benefits we anticipate from the pending sale-leaseback transaction with Blue Owl Real Estate Capital.

​

The Bank entered into an agreement with entities affiliated Blue Owl Real Estate Capital LLC (collectively, “Blue Owl”) to sell over 170 bank branch properties owned and operated by the Bank in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia (the “Branches”) and lease those branches from Blue Owl back to the Bank. While the Company expects the Sale-leaseback Transaction to close in the first quarter of 2025, closing remains subject to satisfying certain conditions precedent, including Blue Owl’s due diligence and the Bank’s ability or willingness to remediate any defects found. Thus, the number of Branches sold, the aggregate purchase price, and the resultant financial impact may be different than what the Company anticipates, resulting in less pre-tax gain, greater expense, lower depreciation expense, and less income. In addition, the Sale-leaseback Transaction could result in higher costs, including higher property taxes, and other unforeseen costs and expenses and other unforeseen risks. There is no assurance that the transaction will close or will generate proceeds sufficient to fund anticipated corporate purposes.   

​

26

Our business strategy includes continued growth, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

​

We intend to continue to pursue a growth strategy for our business. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in pursuing such growth strategies. Our ability to continue to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors, including economic conditions in the markets in which we operate as well as in the U.S. and globally; geopolitical factors resulting in tariffs or other trade disruptions, continued availability of desirable business opportunities; the competitive responses from other financial and non-financial institution competitors in our market areas; the regulatory environment in which we operate, including supervisory and capital and liquidity expectations and our compliance with heightened standards; our ability to continue to implement and improve our operational, credit, financial, management and other risk controls and processes and our reporting systems and procedures to manage a growing number of client relationships; and our ability to integrate any acquisitions and develop consistent policies throughout our various businesses. While we believe our market areas are among the highest growth areas in the country, and that we have the management, internal systems, and other resources in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can be no assurance growth opportunities will be available, or growth will be successfully managed. In addition, if we are unable to manage future expansion in our operations, we may experience regulatory, compliance or operational problems, have to slow the pace of growth, or have to incur additional expenditures beyond current projections to support such growth, any of which could adversely affect our business. Particularly in light of prevailing economic and competitive conditions, there can be no assurance that we will be able to expand our market presence in our existing markets or successfully enter new markets, or that any such expansion will not adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations, and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Also, if our growth occurs more slowly than anticipated or declines, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

We may not realize the expected benefits from our strategic initiatives, either in whole or in part, which could negatively impact our future profitability.

Our current strategic plan contains growth, investment, risk management and efficiency initiatives in order to create a better and more profitable Company and remain competitive with other bank and non-bank financial services providers. To achieve our strategic goals, we must successfully execute these initiatives. Our current initiatives include, but are not limited to, successfully integrating IBTX’s business into our Company, thereafter building upon our digital banking initiatives by continuing to implement real time payments and expanding our payment capabilities, continuing to grow our middle market and larger corporate banking and correspondent divisions, continuing to enhance our technology and cybersecurity infrastructure and enhancing our risk management framework to comply with the OCC’s heightened standards. While we have met our strategic initiatives in the past, there is no guarantee that these initiatives will be successful in supporting growth or achieving the expected efficiencies and revenue enhancements that we anticipate.

Furthermore, our strategic initiatives may result in an increase in expenses, divert management attention, take away from other opportunities, negatively impact operational effectiveness or impact employee morale. In addition, management expects to continue to make strategic investments in technology and talent that are expected to improve our client experience and support future growth, which will require an increase in our expenditures. There can be no assurance that we will ultimately realize the anticipated benefits of these strategic initiatives, or that these strategic initiatives will not negatively impact our organization. These initiatives may fail to meet our own or our clients’ expectations and may fail to keep pace with bank and non-bank competition and we may realize significant losses as a result.

We may not be able to adequately anticipate and respond to changes in market interest rates.

We may be unable to anticipate changes in market interest rates, which are affected by many factors beyond our control including but not limited to inflation, monetary and fiscal policy, money supply, recessionary pressures, unemployment and other changes that affect domestic and foreign financial markets.

​

27

We depend on our net interest income to drive our profitability. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we receive from interest-earning assets (e.g., loans and investment securities) and the interest expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities (e.g., deposits and borrowings). Our net interest income is affected by the level and pace of interest rate changes and other developments such as the shape of the yield curve and relationships between interest sensitive instruments and key driver rates, as well as balance sheet growth, customer loan and deposit preferences, competitive dynamics and the timing of changes in these variables. We are exposed to changes in general interest rate levels and other economic factors beyond our control, and an increase in our cost of funds could negatively impact our net interest income. Net interest income will decline in a particular period if:

Our net interest income may also decline based on our exposure to a difference in short-term and long-term interest rates. If the difference between the interest rates shrinks or disappears, the difference between rates paid on deposits and received on loans could narrow significantly resulting in a decrease in net interest income. In addition to these factors, if market interest rates rise rapidly, interest rate adjustment caps may limit increases in the interest rates on adjustable rate loans, thus reducing our net interest income. In addition, certain adjustable rate loans reprice based on lagging interest rate indices. This lagging effect may also negatively impact our net interest income when general interest rates continue to rise periodically.

The Federal Reserve’s interest rate changes (whether increases or decreases) have impacted the rates we charge borrowers and depositors and our net interest margin. We cannot predict the nature or timing of future changes in monetary policies or the precise effects that they may have on our activities and financial results.

In addition, our net interest income may be adversely affected by resurgent inflationary pressures and new global supply chain challenges, fiscal policies, geopolitical matters, including as a result of changes in U.S. presidential administrations or Congress, the implementation of tariffs and other protectionist trade policies, weather events or other developments. While the rate of inflation for 2024 was lower than that experienced in either 2021, 2022 or 2023, it continued to exceed the Federal Reserve’s two percent (2%) annual target. There is a risk that inflation may become higher or persist for longer periods of time and not decrease. We increased rates in response to the Federal Reserve’s interest rate increases, and decreased rates in response to Federal Reserve’s interest rate decreases and loan demand has been muted while the longer-term rate environment becomes clearer. As interest rates rise, competition for deposits increased, leading to higher deposit costs and reduced liquidity, and as rates have fallen, deposit costs have been moderating, and liquidity has increased. Any new increase in interest rates to address inflationary pressures or otherwise could result in declines in demand for our banking products and services and could negatively impact, among other things, our liquidity, regulatory capital, goodwill and our growth strategy.

Inflation could negatively impact our business and our profitability.

Continued inflation may impact our profitability by negatively impacting our fixed costs and expenses, including increasing funding costs and expense related to talent acquisition and retention, and negatively impacting the demand for our products and services. Additionally, inflation may lead to a decrease in consumer and clients purchasing power and negatively affect the need or demand for our products and services. If significant inflation continues, our business could be negatively affected by, among other things, increased default rates leading to credit losses which could decrease our appetite for new credit extensions. These inflationary pressures could also result in missed earnings and budgetary projections.

​

28

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, FDIC insurance assessments, interest rates and competitive pressures.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of increases in interest rates, competitive pressures, general economic conditions and FDIC insurance assessments. We have traditionally obtained funds principally through local deposits and we have a base of lower cost transaction deposits. Generally, we believe local deposits are a less expensive and more stable source of funds than other borrowings because interest rates paid for local deposits are typically lower than interest rates charged for borrowings from other institutional lenders and reflect a mix of transaction and time deposits, whereas brokered deposits typically are higher cost time deposits. Our costs of funds and our profitability and liquidity are likely to be adversely affected, if and to the extent we have to rely upon higher cost borrowings from other institutional lenders or brokers to fund loan demand or liquidity needs, and changes in our deposit mix and growth could adversely affect our profitability and the ability to expand our loan portfolio.

In addition, events impacting the banking industry in 2023 resulted in significant disruption and volatility in the capital markets, reduced current valuations of securities portfolios and bank stocks, and decreased confidence in banks among depositors and other counterparties as well as investors. While these events occurred in the context of rapidly rising interest rates, and such rate increases and disruption and volatility has since abated, there remain unrealized losses in longer duration debt securities and loans held by banks, increased competition for deposits, and potentially an increased risk of a recession. A decrease in the supply of deposits or significant increase in competition for deposits could result in substantial increases in costs to retain and service deposits. In addition, increased adoption of consumer banking technology can result in reduced deposit stickiness due to the relative ease with which depositors may transfer deposits to a different depository institution in the event that confidence is lost in the Bank. The cost of resolving the bank failures in early 2023 prompted the FDIC to issue a special assessment to recover costs to the Deposit Insurance Fund, and such special assessments may continue to be imposed. Please see Item I – Part 1 – “Supervision and Regulation – FDIC Insurance Assessments and Depositor Preference” for further information.

The implementation of new lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risk.

We continuously evaluate our service offerings and may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business in new sales channels such as online and mobile banking in the future. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services, we undergo a new product process to assess the risks of, and resources needed for, the initiative and invest significant time and resources to build internal controls, policies and procedures to mitigate those risks, including hiring experienced management to oversee the implementation of the initiative. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services and/or new sales channels may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business and/or a new product or service and/or sales channels. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could require the establishment of new key and other controls and have a significant impact on our existing system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and/or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

​

Technological changes, including artificial intelligence and online and mobile banking, have the potential of disrupting our business model, and we may have fewer resources than many competitors to invest in technological improvements.

The financial services industry continues to undergo rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, including artificial intelligence tools to enhance efficiencies, as well as mobile and online banking services. Changes in customer behaviors have increased the need to offer these options to our customers. The past several years accelerated technological change as our employees and the customers and communities to which we provide products and services converted to remote work, shopping and banking as we experienced supply chain interruptions.

​

29

In addition to serving clients better, investments in, and the effective use of, technology, including artificial intelligence, may increase efficiency and may enable financial institutions to reduce costs. Although we are making focused investments in automation and other technology solutions to improve both our customer facing and back-office services and have strategically introduced artificial intelligence tools for internal efficiencies, investments may not be sufficient or provide the anticipated benefits or desired return. We can make no assurance that investments will be sufficient to increase efficiencies, retain existing customers or attract new customers in the future.

Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to invest in and use technology to provide products and services that provide convenience to customers and to create additional efficiencies in operations. One of our strategic goals is to continue to focus on technological change and digital transformation of our product and service channels, which will impact how we deliver our products and services in the future as well as make our internal processes more efficient. We need to make significant additional capital investments in technology in the future to achieve this strategic goal, and we may not be able to implement effectively new technology-driven products and services in a timely manner in response to changes in customer behaviors, thus adversely impacting our operations. Many competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than the Company.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, and events that negatively impact the real estate market could hurt our business.

​

A significant portion of our loan portfolios are secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 78.5% of such loans had real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. There can be no assurance that our local markets will not experience another economic decline. A decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of other financial institutions whose real estate loan portfolios are more geographically diverse. Any weakening of the real estate market may increase the likelihood of default of these loans, which could negatively impact our loan portfolio’s performance and asset quality. Such a determination may lead to an additional increase in our allowance for credit losses, which could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our loan portfolio includes commercial and commercial real estate loans that may have higher risks.

Our commercial industrial, construction and land development and commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $24.1 billion and $23.2 billion, respectively, or 71% and 71%, respectively, of total loans. Commercial and commercial real estate loans generally carry larger loan balances and can involve a greater degree of financial and credit risk than other loans. The increased financial and credit risk associated with these types of loans are a result of several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the size of loan balances, the effects of general economic conditions on income-producing properties and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Any formal or informal action by our supervisors may require us to take increased reserves on these loans and could affect our share price.

As a result, banking regulators give greater scrutiny to lenders with a high concentration of commercial real estate loans in their portfolios, and such lenders are expected to implement stricter underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as maintain higher capital levels and loss allowances. Concentrations in commercial real estate are monitored by regulatory agencies and subject to especially heightened scrutiny both on a public and confidential basis. The Guidance states that the following metrics may indicate a concentration of commercial real estate loans, but that these metrics are neither limits nor a safe harbor:

Regulators may require banks to maintain elevated levels of capital or liquidity due to commercial real estate loan concentrations, and could do so, especially if there is a downturn in our local real estate markets. See Part I Item 1 “Supervision and Regulation – Lending Standards and Guidance” for further details on the Guidance.

30

Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate or commercial project. If the cash flows from the project are reduced, a borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. This cash flow shortage may result in the failure to make loan payments. In such cases, we may be compelled to modify the terms of the loan. In addition, the nature of these loans is such that they are generally less predictable and more difficult to evaluate and monitor. As a result, repayment of these loans may, to a greater extent than residential loans, be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or economy.

We are subject to the risk of default by our clients and counterparties.

Many of our transactions expose us to credit risk if counterparties or clients default on their obligations. This risk increases if the collateral cannot be liquidated or is sold at a price insufficient to cover the full loan. When engaging in credit transactions, we rely on representations and information provided by counterparties and clients, such as financial statements, credit reports, and other disclosures. If the information or representations are inaccurate, our ability to assess default risk effectively may be compromised, potentially leading to unfavorable transactions that could impact our financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to effectively manage credit risk and interest rate risk, our business and financial condition will suffer.

We must effectively manage credit risk. There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting and guidelines, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers and risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral. There is no assurance that our credit risk monitoring and loan approval procedures are or will be adequate or will reduce the inherent risks associated with lending. Our credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting customers and the quality of our loan portfolio. Any failure to manage such credit risks may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We must also effectively manage interest rate risk. Because mortgage loans typically have much longer maturities than deposits or other types of funding, rising interest rates can raise the cost of funding relative to the value of the mortgage loan. We manage this risk in part by holding adjustable rate mortgages in portfolios and through other means. Conversely, the value of our mortgage servicing assets may fall when interest rates fall, as borrowers refinance into lower rate loans. Given current rates, material reductions in rates may not be probable, but as rates rise, this risk increases, as evidenced by the March 2023 bank failures. There can be no assurance that we will successfully manage the lending and servicing businesses through all future interest rate environments.

A lack of liquidity and/or ineffective liquidity management practices could affect our operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our funding sources include core deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, non-core deposits, and short- and long-term debt. Other sources of liquidity are available to us should they be needed, including our ability to acquire additional non-core deposits, the issuance and sale of debt securities, a secured line of credit we have with U.S. Bank, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the Federal Reserve Discount Window, and the issuance and sale of preferred or common securities in public or private transactions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities or on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general, as evidenced by the March 2023 bank failures. Our ability to borrow could be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as further disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued deterioration in credit markets.

​

31

In connection with the IBTX Merger, we are integrating a larger balance sheet and funding structure, which may introduce complexities in liquidity management. If deposit growth does not meet expectations or funding costs rise unexpectedly, our ability to maintain adequate liquidity could be impacted. Further, effective management of liquidity risk includes, among other practices, establishing liquidity key risk indicators and related risk tolerances, maintaining a portfolio of high-quality liquid assets, building and maintaining loan collateral at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and Federal Reserve Discount Window, cash flow forecasting, diversifying funding sources, designing and using stress testing scenarios, and implementing an operational contingency funding plan. Our failure to effectively manage our liquidity risk through one or more of these practices could lead to operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage, resulting in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The results of our most recent stress tests may not accurately predict the impact on our financial condition if the economy were to deteriorate.

We perform capital stress testing on an annual basis using the stress testing assumptions provided by the regulators for the CCAR stress tests. We perform liquidity stress testing and credit stress testing on a quarterly basis. Under the capital stress test, we estimate our loan losses (loan charge-offs), resources available to absorb those losses and any necessary additions to capital that would be required under the “severely adverse” stress test scenario. The results of these stress tests involve many assumptions about the economy and future loan losses and default rates and may not accurately reflect the impact on our financial condition if the economy were to deteriorate. Any deterioration of the economy could result in credit losses significantly higher, with a corresponding impact on our financial condition and capital, than those predicted by our internal stress test.

The Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) standard and merger activity may result in increased volatility and further increases in our allowance for credit losses (“ACL”).

​

The measure of our ACL is dependent on the interpretation of applicable accounting standards, as well as external events, including the IBTX Merger, the path of interest rates and inflation, market conditions, including recession risk and the possible impact on the unemployment rate and the performance of our loan portfolio, and other factors including the conflict in Ukraine, the conflicts in the middle east and other geopolitical tensions, performance of the commercial real estate markets, and natural disasters such as hurricanes and flooding or pandemics such as COVID-19. We adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL standard, in the first quarter of 2020. Under the CECL model, we are required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held to maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount and certain management judgments over the life of the loan. This initial measurement took place as of January 1, 2020, at the time of our adoption of CECL.

The CECL model has resulted in and may continue to result in differences in the impact of forward-looking information and timing of reserve builds and releases from our ACL, as compared to the “incurred loss” standard that we previously applied in determining our ACL. The CECL model requires us to estimate the lifetime “expected credit loss” with respect to loans and other applicable financial assets, which may produce changes of a greater magnitude than the level of “incurred losses” that would have been used to determine our allowance for loan losses under the prior incurred loss standard. The challenges associated with estimated lifetime credit losses in view of the economic aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and government fiscal and monetary intervention have resulted in continued forecasting uncertainties that impact the timing and magnitude of changes in our ACL in the future, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s estimate of its ACL involves a high degree of judgment; therefore, the Company's process for determining expected credit losses may result in a range of expected credit losses. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach a different reasonable conclusion. Further, if management’s assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect and the allowance for credit losses is inadequate to absorb losses going forward, or if bank regulatory authorities require us to increase the allowance for credit losses as a part of their examination process, our earnings and capital could be significantly and adversely affected.

​

32

Our size and continued pace of growth may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. The Company also may be compelled to raise capital if regulatory or supervisory requirements change and as a result of the acquisition of IBTX may face further government scrutiny due to the increased size of the Company’s business. Our ability to raise capital, if needed, in the future to meet capital requirements or otherwise will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, there is no assurance as to our ability to raise additional capital if needed on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired.

Our ability to access the capital markets, if needed, will depend on a number of factors, including the state of the financial markets. Rising interest rates, disruptions in financial markets, negative perceptions of our business or our financial strength, or other factors may impact our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us. For example, in the event of future turmoil in the banking industry or other idiosyncratic events, there is no guarantee that the U.S. government will invoke the systemic risk exception, create additional liquidity programs, or take any other action to stabilize the banking industry or provide liquidity. Any diminished ability to access short-term funding or capital markets to raise additional capital, if needed, could subject us to liability, restrict our ability to grow, require us to take actions that would affect our earnings negatively or otherwise affect our business and our ability to implement our business plan, capital plan and strategic goals adversely.

Our processes for managing risk may not be effective in mitigating risk or losses to us.

The objectives of our risk management program and processes are to mitigate risk and loss to our organization. We have established an enterprise risk framework and program that are intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the types of risks to which we are subject across the organization and business lines, including liquidity risk, credit risk, strategic risk, market risk, interest rate risk, operational risk (including payments risk, BSA/AML risk, and model risk), cybersecurity risk, corporate governance and legal risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, and reputational risk (including environmental and social risks), among others. We also assess new and emerging risks on our existing programs. However, this framework will evolve as we expect to become subject to heightened expectations from the OCC as we grow above $50 billion in assets. In addition, as with any risk management process, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. The ongoing developments in the financial services industry continue to highlight both the importance and some of the limitations of managing unanticipated risks. Any potential new regulations or modifications to existing regulations would also likely necessitate changes to our existing regulatory compliance and risk management infrastructure. If our risk management processes prove ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected.

Rising mortgage rates and adverse changes in mortgage market conditions could adversely impact our mortgage line of business.

Our mortgage line of business contributes significantly to our results of operations. The residential real estate mortgage lending business is sensitive to changes in interest rates, especially long-term interest rates. As interest rates increased during 2022 and 2023, the demand for mortgages has decreased materially, and our mortgage volume has substantially decreased as well. While we have adjusted our business model to sell a larger percentage of our originations into the secondary market, the gain on sale opportunities have been smaller than in previous years. Further, the portion of our mortgage loans that are originated for our portfolio subjects the Company to increased interest rate risk. Additionally, the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights is sensitive to changes in interest rates and interest rate volatility. Any change in the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights may negatively impact earnings. As a result of these and other factors, our price and profitability targets for this business may not be met, reducing our results of operations in the line of business and our net income. Further, risk in the mortgage business is heightened due to external factors, such as compliance with regulations, historically low housing inventories restraining home sales, competitive alternatives, changing tax rates and strategies, economic conditions, and shifting market preferences, which could impact the profitability of these lines of business and have a material adverse effect on our businesses, and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

​

33

Our recent results may not be indicative of our future results.

We may not be able to sustain our historical rate of growth or may not even be able to grow our business at all. In addition, our recent growth may distort some of our historical financial ratios and statistics. Various factors, such as economic conditions, regulatory and legislative considerations and competition, may also impede or prohibit our ability to expand our market presence. If we experience a significant decrease in our historical rate of growth, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected due to a high percentage of our operating costs being fixed expenses.

We are subject to environmental risks in our lending activities.

Because a significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property, we may foreclose upon and take title to such property in the ordinary course of business. If hazardous substances were discovered on any of these properties, we may be liable to governmental agencies or third parties for the full costs of investigation, remediation, as well as for related personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws might require us to incur substantial expenses, materially reduce the property’s value, or limit our ability to use or sell the property. Although our management has policies requiring environmental reviews before loans secured by real property are made and before foreclosure is commenced, it is still possible that environmental risks might not be detected and that the associated costs might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Many environmental laws impose strict liability regardless of whether the Company knew of, or was responsible for, the contamination. In addition, banks’ credit and underwriting policies that result in funding fossil fuel projects may impact climate change and lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions. Banks have very limited control over the actions of their clients, and while banks can monitor environmental profiles, information currently available is insufficient to assess both environmental risk and the financial risk inherent in making lending decisions. Accordingly, the Bank may be unable to assess how our lending decisions affect both our risk profile and our profitability.

While we use appraisals in deciding whether to make a loan that is secured by real estate, they do not ensure the value of the real property collateral.

In deciding whether to make a loan secured by real property, we generally require an appraisal. However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made. If the appraisal amount does not reflect the amount that may be obtained upon a sale or foreclosure of the property, we may not realize an amount equal to the indebtedness secured by the property.

We are subject to losses due to errors, omissions or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, counterparties or other third parties.

We are exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of fraud by third parties, customers and employees, clerical recordkeeping errors and transactional errors. Like the financial services industry overall, we have seen an increase in fraudulent attempts on accounts, online transactions, and debit cards during 2024, and these attempts may continue to accelerate with the increased use of artificial intelligence to produce sophisticated malware, phishing schemes, and other fraudulent activities. While (i) our procedures are designed to follow customary, industry-specific security precautions, (ii) we use software to monitor check and online and digital transaction, (iii) we provide employees with ongoing training, table-top exercises and regular communications and guidance to combat fraud, and (iv) we have adopted additional cybersecurity tools and solutions designed to identify fraudulent attempts, our efforts might not be successful in mitigating or reducing fraudulent attempts resulting in financial losses, increased litigation risk and reputational harm.

Our business also is dependent on our employees as well as third-party service providers to process a large number of increasingly larger and more complex transactions. These risks will increase as we implement a real time payments platform. We could be materially and adversely affected if employees, clients, counterparties or other third parties caused an operational breakdown or failure, either as a result of human error, fraudulent manipulation or purposeful damage to any of our operations or systems.

​

34

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with clients and counterparties, we may rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of clients and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We also may rely on representations of clients and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to clients, we may assume that a customer’s audited financial statements conform to GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. Our earnings are significantly affected by our ability to properly originate, underwrite and service loans. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted to the extent we incorrectly assess the creditworthiness of our borrowers, fail to detect or respond to deterioration in asset quality in a timely manner, or rely on financial statements that do not comply with GAAP or are materially misleading.

The adoption and use of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.

​

Our adoption and use of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze or generate data or other materials or content (collectively, “AI”), for limited internal use has increased our efficiency, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third-party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings faster than we are able to do so independently. There are significant and evolving risks involved in utilizing AI, and no assurance can be provided that our or our third party vendors’ or service providers’ use of AI will enhance our or our third party vendors’ or service providers’ products or services or produce the intended results. The adoption and incorporation of such AI tools can lead to concerns around safety and soundness, fair access to financial services, fair treatment of consumers, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Such risk can result from models being incorrectly or inadequately designed or trained, inadequate model testing or validation, narrow or limited human oversight, inadequate planning or due diligence, inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers or end-users, and other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI and the acceptance of AI solutions. Further, generative AI has been known to, and may continue to, create biased, incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or poor-quality output or produce other discriminatory or unexpected results, errors, or inadequacies, any of which may not be easily detectable. AI solutions may also be adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, cyber-attacks, cybersecurity breaches, service outages or other similar incidents, or material performance issues. We have implemented an AI governance function and risk management framework that includes a risk assessment of internal and vendor AI solutions, due diligence, model validation, and controls. However, given the pace of rapid adoption of such tools by vendors and service providers, we may not be aware of the addition of AI solutions prior to such tools being introduced into our environment. Failure to adequately manage AI risks can result in erroneous results and decisions made by misinformation, unwanted forms of bias, unauthorized access to sensitive, confidential, proprietary or personal information, and violations of applicable laws and regulations, leading to operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, reputational harm, ethical challenges, legal liability, losses, fines, and other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. If we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which the AI tools we use rely, or to use the output of such AI tools, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy or other rights, or contracts to which we are a party. Further, our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI into their business or operations more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively.

​

​

35

In addition, regulation of AI is rapidly evolving as legislatures and regulators are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including intellectual property, data privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition, equal opportunity, and fair lending laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or new applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and various U.S. states are applying, or are considering applying, existing laws and regulations to AI or are considering general legal frameworks for AI. We may not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly evolving frameworks, and we may need to expend resources to adjust our operations or offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks are inconsistent across jurisdictions. Furthermore, because AI technology itself is highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all the legal, operational or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI. We expect our use of AI will require additional resources, including the incurrence of additional costs, to develop and maintain our products and services to minimize potentially harmful or unintended consequences, to comply with applicable and emerging laws and regulations, to maintain or extend our competitive position, and to address any ethical, reputational, technical, operational, legal, competitive or regulatory issues which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing.

We are subject to sustainability, stewardship and governance risks that could adversely affect our reputation and/or our business, operations, and earnings.

​

Governments, investors, customers, and the general public have been focused on sustainability, stewardship and governance practices and disclosures. For us and others in the financial services industry, this focus extends to the practices and disclosures of customers, counterparties, and service providers with whom we choose to do business. In addition, certain organizations that provide corporate governance and other corporate risk information to investors and shareholders have developed scores and ratings to evaluate companies based upon sustainability, stewardship and governance metrics, and certain investors integrate these factors into their analysis of the expected risk and return of potential investments. Currently, there are no universal standards for such scores, ratings or analyses, and views are diverse, dynamic, and rapidly changing. Further, because we have multiple stakeholders, often those stakeholders have differing and sometimes conflicting priorities and expectations regarding these issues that must be considered. If we fail or are perceived to fail in meeting our stakeholders’ expectations, or if we take actions in conflict with these expectations, this could lead to loss of business, negative publicity in traditional and social media, or an adverse impact on our ability to attract and retain customers and employees.

Our business could suffer if we fail to maintain our culture and attract and retain experienced people.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain competent, experienced people. Our strategic goals in particular require that we be able to attract qualified and experienced retail, commercial and corporate banking officers, mortgage loan officers, and SBA lenders in our existing markets as well as those markets in which we may want to expand who share our relationship banking philosophy and have those customer relationships that will allow us to grow successfully. We also need to attract and retain qualified and experienced technology, risk and back-office personnel to operate our business. Many of our competitors are pursuing the same relationship banking strategy in our markets and are looking to hire and retain qualified technology, risk and back-office personnel, which increases the competition to identify, hire and retain talented employees.

The Company’s recent mergers and the continued integration of the Company’s operations and employees into one bank creates an additional risk to the Company’s culture. If we fail to consider and account for corporate cultural differences across the companies due to various mergers, we will face increased difficulty in creating a cohesive culture.

We have focused, and will continue to focus, our strategic attention on our employees and our corporate culture, including enhancing our employee orientation, ongoing general credit and management training, leadership training and mentoring, and employee work environment as well as diversity and employee advancement. Our failure to maintain our culture and attractive working environment, through competitive compensation packages that reward initiative, as well as mentoring, training, and advancement opportunities in order to successfully compete for experienced, qualified employees may have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our financial goals and thus adversely affect our future results of operations.

​

36

If we are unable to offer our key management personnel long term incentive compensation, including restricted stock units and performance share units, as part of their total compensation package, we may have difficulty retaining such personnel, which would adversely affect our operations and financial performance.

We have a management team that has substantial experience in banking and financial services in the markets we serve. We rely on our management team to achieve and sustain our profitability. Our future success and profitability are substantially dependent upon this management and banking abilities of our senior executives. Although we currently have employment agreements in place with our executive management team and our regional presidents, we cannot guarantee that our executives will remain with us. Changes in key personnel and their responsibilities may be disruptive to our business because of their skills, customer relationship and/or the potential difficulty of promptly replacing them with successors.

We have historically granted equity awards under an equity compensation plan, which includes granting performance share units and restricted stock awards or restricted stock units, to key management personnel as part of a competitive compensation package. Our ability to grant these awards has been vital to attracting, retaining and aligning shareholder interest with a talented management team in a highly competitive marketplace.

Shareholder advisory groups have implemented guidelines and issued voting recommendations related to how much equity companies should be able to grant to employees. The factors used to formulate these guidelines and voting recommendations include the volatility of a company’s share price and are influenced by broader macroeconomic conditions that can change year to year. The variables used by shareholder advisory groups to formulate equity plan recommendations may limit our ability to adopt new equity plans in the future. In addition, the federal banking regulators have issued guidance on executive compensation and have also, along with the SEC, proposed rules that would prohibit certain incentive compensation arrangements. We do not believe that the guidance or proposal will impact our current compensation arrangements.

If we are limited in our ability to grant equity compensation awards, we would need to explore offering other compelling alternatives to supplement our compensation, including long-term cash compensation plans or significantly increased short-term cash compensation, in order to continue to attract and retain key management personnel. If we used these alternatives to long-term equity awards, our compensation costs could increase, and our financial performance could be adversely affected. If we are unable to offer key management personnel long-term incentive compensation, including stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units, or performance share units, as part of their total compensation package, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining such personnel, which would adversely affect our operations and financial performance.

We rely on the performance of highly skilled personnel and if we are unable to attract, retain, develop and motivate our human capital in the form of well-qualified employees, our business and results of operations could be harmed.

We believe our success has depended, continues to and in the future will depend, on the efforts and talents of our management team and our highly skilled employees and workers. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. The loss of any of our senior management or key employees could materially and adversely affect our ability to build on the efforts that they have undertaken and to execute our business plan, and we may not be able to find adequate replacements. Despite our current efforts, we cannot ensure that we will be able to retain the services of any members of our senior management or other key employees. If we do not succeed in attracting well-qualified employees or developing, retaining, and motivating our employees, our business and results of operations could be harmed.

​

37

We may not be able to successfully implement current or future information technology and cybersecurity system enhancements and operational initiatives, which could adversely affect our business operations and profitability.

​

We continue to invest significant resources in our information technology and cybersecurity systems, including by deepening and expanding our use of cloud-based applications, in order to provide enhanced functionality and security at an appropriate level, improve our operating efficiency, and streamline our client experience. These initiatives significantly increase the complexity of our relationships with third-party service providers, and such relationships may be difficult to unwind. We may not be able to successfully implement and integrate such system enhancements and initiatives, which could adversely impact our ability to enhance our product and service offerings and meet the expectations of our customers. In addition, these projects could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations. Failure to properly adopt system enhancements could result in impairment charges that adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations, could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components and could impact our ability to compete. In addition, we may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expense during and after implementation, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time. As such, we cannot guarantee that the anticipated long-term benefits of these system enhancements and operational initiatives will be realized.

A failure of or disruption to our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party service providers, could disrupt our business, damage our reputation, increase our costs and cause losses.

The potential for operational risk exposure exists throughout our business and, as a result of our interactions with, and reliance on, third parties, is not limited to our own internal operational functions. We depend on our ability to process, record and monitor a large number of client transactions on a continuous basis. Further, third parties provide key components of our business infrastructure, such as our core processing, underwriting and servicing software, data collection and analysis, loan and deposit documents, compliance and risk software, product and service offerings, and internet connections and network access. As client, public and regulatory expectations regarding operational, information, and cyber security have increased, we and our third-party service providers must continue to safeguard and monitor our operational and security systems and infrastructure for potential failures, threats, disruptions and breakdowns. Our business, financial, accounting, data processing, or other operating systems and facilities, or those of our third-party service providers, may stop operating properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. Although we have information and cybersecurity policies and procedures, business continuity plans and other safeguards in place, our business operations may be adversely affected by significant and widespread failure of or disruption to our operational and security systems and infrastructure that support our businesses and clients. Any disruption or failure in our operational or security systems or infrastructure or the services provided by third parties, or any failure by us or these third parties to handle current or higher volumes of use, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our clients, process transactions and otherwise to conduct business.

​

38

For example, our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party service providers, may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors, including: sudden increases in customer transaction volume; electrical, telecommunications or other major physical infrastructure outages; cyber-attacks, information security breaches or other similar incidents; natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and floods; pandemics; and events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including wars and terrorist acts. In addition, we rely on our employees and third parties in our day-to-day and ongoing operations, who may, as a result of human error, misconduct, malfeasance or failure, expose us to risk. Moreover, technological or financial difficulties of one of our third-party service providers or their sub-contractors could adversely affect our business to the extent those difficulties result in the interruption or discontinuation of services provided by that party. In the event that backup systems are utilized, they may not process data as quickly as our primary systems and some data might not have been saved to backup systems, potentially resulting in a temporary or permanent loss of such data. Further, our ability to implement backup systems and other safeguards with respect to third-party systems is more limited than with respect to our own systems. Our business recovery plan may not be adequate and may not prevent significant interruptions of our operations or substantial losses. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of a disruption to or failure of the operation of our operational and security systems and infrastructure, there could be no assurance that any such disruptions or failures will not occur or, if they do, that they will be adequately addressed. Any failure or interruption in the operation of our communications and information systems and networks could impair or prevent the effective operation of our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, lending or other functions. We frequently update our systems to support our operations and growth and to remain compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. This updating entails significant costs and creates risks associated with implementing new systems and integrating them with existing ones, including business interruptions. Implementation and testing of controls related to our computer systems, security monitoring and retaining and training personnel required to operate our systems also entail significant costs.

We may not be insured against all types of losses as a result of disruptions to or failures of our operational and security systems and infrastructure or those of our third-party service providers, and our insurance coverage may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, or may be inadequate to cover all losses resulting from such disruptions or failures. Disruptions or failures in our business structure or in the structure of one or more of our third-party service providers could interrupt the operations or increase the cost of doing business. The occurrence of any disruptions or failures impacting our or our third-party service providers’ operational or security systems or infrastructure could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and expose us to additional regulatory scrutiny, civil litigation, and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

We face cybersecurity risks from cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents that could result in the disclosure of confidential and other information (including personal information), adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.

Our computer systems and network infrastructure and those of third parties, on which we are highly dependent, are subject to cybersecurity risks and could be susceptible to cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents. Our business relies on the secure processing, transmission, storage, retrieval and other processing of confidential, proprietary, personal and other information in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties. In addition, to access our network, products and services, our customers and other third parties may use personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network environment and are subject to their own cybersecurity risks.

​

39

We, our customers, regulators and other third parties, including other financial services institutions and companies engaged in data processing, have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber-attacks, information security breaches, and other similar incidents. These may include hacking, terrorist activities, identity theft, computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, phishing attacks, denial of service attacks, ransomware, improper access by employees or third parties, social engineering, attacks on personal email of employees, or other information security breaches or similar incidents that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, misappropriation, loss, disclosure or destruction of confidential, proprietary, personal and other information of ours, our employees, our customers or of third parties, damage our systems or otherwise materially disrupt our or our customers’ or other third parties’ network access or business operations. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other similar incidents. Despite efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems and implement controls, processes, policies and other protective measures, we may not be able to anticipate or detect all cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other similar incidents, nor may we be able to implement guaranteed preventive measures against cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other similar incidents. Cyber threats are increasing and rapidly evolving, and we may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks and could be held liable for any security breach or loss.

Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years, in part because of the proliferation of new technologies and the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions. For example, cybersecurity risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our mobile payment and other internet-based product offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications and as AI tools are increasingly used for purposes of cyber-attacks, information security breaches, and other similar incidents, including for targeted social engineering attacks. In addition, cybersecurity risks have significantly increased in recent years in part due to the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations, hostile foreign governments, disgruntled employees, service providers, activists and other external parties, including those involved in corporate espionage. Even the most advanced internal control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. For example, targeted social engineering attacks and “spear phishing” attacks are becoming more sophisticated and are extremely difficult to prevent. In such an attack, an attacker will attempt to fraudulently induce colleagues, customers or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information to gain access to its data or that of its clients. Persistent attackers may succeed in penetrating defenses given enough resources, time, and motive. The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently and may not be recognized until launched or until well after a breach has occurred.

The risk of a security breach caused by a cyber-attack at a service provider or by unauthorized service provider access has also increased in recent years. Additionally, the existence of cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other similar incidents at third-party service providers with access to our confidential, proprietary, personal and other information may not be disclosed to us in a timely manner, and we cannot guarantee that we can obtain adequate or any reimbursement from such third-party service providers in the event we should suffer any disruption, compromise, failure, liability, reputational harm or other cost or expense. While we have processes in place to monitor our third-party service providers’ data and information security safeguards, we do not control such service providers’ day to day operations and a successful cyber-attack, information security breach, or other similar incident at one or more of such third-party service providers is not within our control. The occurrence of any such cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other incidents could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and expose us to additional regulatory scrutiny, civil litigation, and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, due to applicable laws and regulations or contractual obligations, we may be held responsible for system failures, interruptions, or cyber-attacks attributed to such third-party service providers as they relate to the information we share with them.

​

​

40

We also face indirect technology, cybersecurity and operational risks relating to the customers, clients and other third parties with whom we do business or upon whom we rely to facilitate or enable our business activities, including, for example, financial counterparties, regulators, and providers of critical infrastructure such as internet access and electrical power. As a result of increasing consolidation, interdependence and complexity of financial entities and technology systems, a technology failure, cyber-attack, information security breach or other similar incident that significantly degrades, deletes or compromises the systems or data of one or more financial entities could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including us. This consolidation, interconnectivity and complexity increases the risk of operational failure, on both individual and industry-wide bases, as disparate systems need to be integrated, often on an accelerated basis. Any third-party technology failure, cyber-attack, information security breach, or other similar incident could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service our clients, manage our exposure to risk or expand our business. In addition, we, our employees, and our customers are increasingly transitioning our and their computing infrastructure to cloud-based computing, storage, data processing, networking and other services, which may increase our cybersecurity risk.

Cyber-attacks, information security breaches, and other similar incidents, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber-attack on our systems has been successful, whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with customers and third parties with whom we do business. Hacking or other unauthorized disclosure of personal information and identity theft risks, in particular, could cause serious reputational harm. A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause us serious negative consequences, including our loss of customers and business opportunities, significant business disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation or destruction of our confidential, proprietary, personal or other information and/or that of our customers or other third parties, or damage to our or our customers’ and/or third parties’ computers or systems, and could result in a violation of applicable data privacy and cybersecurity laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, additional compliance costs, and could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. We may not be insured against all types of losses as a result of cyber-attacks, information security breaches, and other similar incidents, and our insurer may deny coverage as to any future claim or insurance coverage may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, or may be inadequate to cover all losses resulting from such incidents.

We experienced a cybersecurity incident in February 2024 involving unauthorized activity in the Company’s systems, which was investigated using a cybersecurity firm and as a result of which we mailed notices to individuals that may have been impacted. A consolidated putative class action is pending against us in Circuit Court in Polk County Florida related to the incident. Although we enhanced our cybersecurity defenses since the incident and to date, and we have not experienced any material losses related to this event, there is no assurance that we will not experience cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other similar incidents in the future or that we will not suffer material losses from such incidents in the future.

We may face risks with respect to future expansion.

Our business growth, profitability and market share has been enhanced by us engaging in strategic mergers and acquisitions and de novo branching either within or contiguous to our existing footprint. We may acquire other financial institutions or parts of financial institutions in the future and engage in lift outs of our banking teams or de novo branching. We may also consider and enter into or acquire new lines of business or offer new products or services, which may also use new sales channels, such as online and mobile banking. As part of our acquisition strategy, we seek companies that are culturally similar to us, have experienced management, and are in markets in which we operate or close to those markets so we can achieve economies of scale.

We expect to continue to evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities that are presented to us in our current and expected markets and conduct due diligence related to those opportunities, as well as negotiate to acquire or merge with other institutions. We may issue equity securities, including common stock and securities convertible into shares of our common stock in connection with future acquisitions. We also may issue debt to finance one or more transactions, including subordinated debt issuances. Generally, acquisitions of financial institutions involve the payment of a premium over book and market values, resulting in dilution of our tangible book value and fully diluted earnings per share, as well as dilution to our existing shareholders. We also face litigation risks with respect to potential mergers and acquisitions, and such litigation is common. We may incur substantial costs to expand, and we can give no assurance such expansion will result in the levels of profits we seek.

41

Moreover, the standards by which bank and financial institution acquisitions will be evaluated may be subject to change. For example, the OCC adopted a final rule in September 2024 amending its procedures for reviewing applications under the BMA and adding a policy statement on the OCC’s substantive approach to evaluating bank mergers under the BMA. The policy statement outlines the general principles the OCC will apply when reviewing bank merger applications and clarifies how the OCC would consider the statutory factors under the BMA. The policy statement identifies certain indicators that are more likely to withstand scrutiny and be approved expeditiously and those that would raise supervisory or regulatory concerns. Indicators generally consistent with timely approval, include, among others, appropriate capital and supervisory ratings, lack of enforcement or fair lending actions, lack of significant CRA or consumer compliance concerns or significant adverse effect on competition, and that the resulting institution would have total assets less than $50 billion, which the Company already exceeds as a result of the IBTX Merger. Further, the Company’s ability to complete future acquisitions may depend on factors outside its control, including changes in the presidential administration or in one or both houses of Congress.

Nevertheless, there is no assurance that market conditions will favor mergers or the financial feasibility of completing an acquisition, obtaining cost savings and operational efficiencies, or realizing merger synergies upon integration. Failure to achieve or delays in achieving anticipated benefits could result in a share price reduction as well as increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues, and diversion of management’s time and energy and could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects. Further, there is no assurance that, following any future mergers or acquisitions, our integration efforts will be successful or our Company, after giving effect to the acquisition, will achieve increased revenues comparable to or better than our historical experience, and failure to realize such expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in market presence or other benefits could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations.

Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future.

While we seek continued organic growth, we anticipate continuing to evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities presented to us in our core markets, contiguous markets, and beyond. The number of financial institutions headquartered in our market areas in the Southeastern United States and across the country continues to decline through merger and other activity. We expect that other banking and financial services companies, many of which have significantly greater resources, will compete with us to acquire financial services businesses. This competition, as the number of appropriate merger targets decreases, could increase prices for potential acquisitions which could reduce our potential returns, and reduce the attractiveness of these opportunities to us. In addition, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals, and if we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, risk management, regulatory and fair lending compliance, including with respect to BSA and AML obligations, consumer protection laws, CRA obligations, and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals.

The standards by which bank and financial institution acquisitions will be evaluated are currently in flux as the Trump administration is expected to reduce regulatory burdens on merger proposals. While the OCC finalized a policy statement on bank mergers in 2024 designed to clarify the agency’s consideration of the statutory factors in the Bank Merger Act for approval of a bank merger, listing the indicators the OCC finds to be consistent with approval (see Part I Item 1 “Supervision and Regulation - Regulation of the Bank”), it is uncertain how these standards and other policies may be interpreted and implemented in the Trump administration. As merger policy remains uncertain, there may be delays in approvals, increasing costs and uncertainties in the ability to successfully merge and integrate a target. Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and shareholders' equity per share of our common stock.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit with the SEC is accurately accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met.

​

42

These inherent limitations include the reality that judgments and decision making can be faulty, that alternative reasoned judgments can be drawn, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an authorized override of the controls. In addition, properly integrating our acquisitions into our disclosure controls and procedures in a timely manner presents challenges. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our controls systems, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected, which could result in a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting and the restatement of previously filed financial statements.

Our accounting policies and processes are critical to how we report our financial condition and results of operations and require our management to make estimates about matters that are uncertain.

Accounting policies and processes are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Several of our accounting policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make certain assumptions and estimates in preparing our financial statements, including determining credit loss reserves, reserves related to litigation and the fair value of certain assets and liabilities, among other items. If the assumptions or estimates underlying our financial statements are incorrect, we may experience material losses.

Certain of our financial instruments, including trading assets and liabilities, derivatives, securities, and certain loans, among other items, require a determination of their fair value in order to prepare our financial statements. Where quoted market prices are not available, we may make fair value determinations based on internally developed models or other means which ultimately rely to some degree on management judgment. Some of these and other assets and liabilities may have no direct observable price levels, making their valuation particularly subjective, being based on significant estimation and judgment. In addition, some illiquidity in markets and declines in prices of certain loans and securities may make it more difficult to value certain balance sheet items, which may lead to the possibility that such valuations will be subject to further change or adjustment, it could lead to declines in our earnings.

The value of securities in our investment portfolio may decline in the future.

As of December 31, 2024, we owned $6.8 billion of investment securities, which included $2.3 billion in held-to-maturity securities, $4.3 billion in available for sale securities and $223.6 million in other investments.  The fair value of our investment securities may be adversely affected by market conditions, including changes in interest rates, and the occurrence of any events adversely affecting the issuer of particular securities in our investments portfolio.  For available-for-sale securities, the unrealized gains and losses are recorded in equity, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).  The Company has elected to exclude AOCI from its regulatory capital calculations, however, after the failure of a few financial institutions in the first quarter of 2023, many investors are taking into consideration losses in available for sale securities included in AOCI along with losses in held to maturity securities, which are not included in our financial statements, in looking at the valuations of financial institutions.

We analyze each available for sale security quarterly on an individual basis to determine if there has been a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis of the security to determine whether there is a credit loss associated with the decline in fair value.  We consider the nature of the collateral, potential future changes in collateral values, default rates, delinquency rates, third-party guarantees, credit ratings, interest rate changes since purchase, volatility of the security’s fair value and historical loss information for financial assets secured with similar collateral among other factors.  We use a systematic methodology to determine the ACL for investment securities held to maturity.  The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the held to maturity portfolio.  We consider the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts on the collectability of the loan portfolio.  Our estimate of the ACL involves a high degree of judgment; therefore, our process for determining expected credit losses my result in a range of expected credit losses.  We monitor the held to maturity portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether a valuation account needs to be recorded.  Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we may be required to recognize expected credit losses on securities in future periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

​

43

Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business, and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect our performance.

Our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. As such, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring, and retaining and providing growth opportunities for employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers, and caring about our customers and employees. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions of our employees or otherwise, including as a result of a successful cyber-attack, information security breach or other similar incident we experience or any other unauthorized release or loss of customer information (including personal information), our business and, therefore, our operating results, may be materially adversely affected.

Actions by the financial service industry generally or by institutions or individuals in the industry can adversely affect our reputation indirectly by association. The proliferation of social media may increase the likelihood that negative public opinion from any of the real or perceived events in the financial services industry could impact our reputation and business. Negative public opinion could adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract and retain clients and teammates and can result in litigation and regulatory actions. All of these could adversely affect our growth, results of operation, and financial conditions.

Risks relating to the Regulatory Environment

As the Company grows, the heightened expectations of regulatory agencies may expose us to additional regulatory risk.

Following completion of the IBTX Merger, the Company reached $65 billion in assets. As a result, it must bolster its risk management and governance framework to support a larger company consistent with the OCC’s heightened standards for larger institutions. These standards include established minimum standards for the design and implementation of the risk management framework and increased oversight and credible challenge by the Board of Directors over the Company’s risk profile and risk management practices. While we have been working to meet these heightened standards over the past two years, which will not apply until September 2026, our existing enterprise risk framework and program may not be easily scalable to meet such heightened standards, thereby requiring lengthy or costly modifications to meet such standards. Further, the Company’s existing workforce may not be sufficient or have the requisite skillset to design, operate and manage the bolstered framework, thereby requiring the Company to expend financial resources to hire and/or train the necessary staff. The Company’s failure to meet such heightened standards may expose it to regulatory enforcement actions and civil penalties which could have an adverse material impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, operations and reputation and could jeopardize the Company’s ability to pursue acquisition opportunities.

​

​

​

​

​

44

We are subject to extensive regulation that could limit or restrict our activities.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the OCC, CFPB, and the FDIC. These laws, regulations, and rules are imposed primarily to protect depositors, the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund, consumers, and the banking system as a whole. We also are regulated by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, whose regulations are designed to protect investors. Our compliance with these regulations is costly and potentially restricts certain of our activities, including payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates charged, interest rates paid and deposits and locations of our offices. We are also subject to capital guidelines established by our regulators, which require us to maintain sufficient capital to support our growth. Regulation of the financial services industry has increased significantly since the global financial crisis. The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at any time. The extent and timing of any regulatory reform as well as any effect on our business and financial results, are uncertain. Additionally, legislation or regulation may impose unexpected or unintended consequences, the impact of which is difficult to predict. Because government regulation greatly affects the business and financial results of all commercial banks and bank holding companies, our cost of compliance could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.

In addition, we expect the Trump administration will seek to implement a regulatory reform agenda that is significantly different than that of the Biden Administration, including, for example, potentially freezing new regulations or hiring for federal agencies. The Trump Administration’s agenda also includes a heightened focus on immigration reform and the use of sanctions and export controls to encourage U.S. economic growth. We cannot predict future changes in the applicable laws, regulations and regulatory agency policies, including any changes resulting from changes in the U.S. presidential administration or U.S. Congress, such as with respect to proposed regulations on capital and long-term debt, or the interpretation or implementation of merger policies. Nevertheless, such changes may have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory responses in connection with severe market downturns or unforeseen stress events may alter or disrupt our planned future strategies and actions. Adverse developments affecting the overall strength and soundness of other financial institutions, the financial services industry as a whole and the general economic climate and the U.S. Treasury market could have a negative impact on perceptions about the strength and soundness of our business even if we are not subject to the same adverse developments. For example, during 2023, the FDIC took control and was appointed receiver of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank, respectively. The failure of other banks and financial institutions and the measures taken by governments and regulators in response to these events, including increased regulatory scrutiny and heightened supervisory expectations, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent regulatory proposals may increase capital and liquidity risks.

We face the risk of becoming subject to new or more stringent requirements in connection with the introduction of new regulations or modifications of existing regulations, which could require us to hold more capital or liquidity or have other adverse effects on our businesses or profitability. For example, the banking regulators proposed changes to the capital rules intended to bring the U.S. capital rules into conformance with the Basel Framework, which would require banking organizations with assets of $100 billion or more to face significantly increased capital requirements. While the proposed rule does not affect the Company directly because it applies only to banking organizations with $100 billion or more in assets, it may adversely impact the Company due to general regulatory and investor expectations for the Company and the Bank to hold additional capital or as a result of larger banking organizations making changes in response to the increased capital requirements, which could have a material impact on the Company’s financial results and business mix. Please see Item I – Part 1 – “Supervision and Regulation – Capital Requirements” for further information regarding the capital rule proposal.

​

45

We are required to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, and if we fail to maintain sufficient capital, whether due to losses, an inability to raise additional capital or otherwise, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as our ability to maintain regulatory compliance, would be adversely affected.

The Company and the Bank each must meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. Banking organizations experiencing growth, especially those making acquisitions, are expected to hold additional capital above regulatory minimums. From time to time, the regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. In recent years, these market and regulatory expectations have increased substantially and have resulted in higher and more stringent capital requirements for us and the Bank.

Actions (if necessary) to increase capital, may adversely affect us. Our ability to raise additional capital, when and if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry and market condition, and governmental activities, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to meet these capital and other regulatory requirements, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our failure to remain “well capitalized” for bank regulatory purposes could affect customer confidence, our ability to grow, our costs of funds, and FDIC insurance costs, our ability to pay dividends on common stock and make distributions on our trust preferred securities, our ability to make acquisitions, and our business, results of operations and financial condition. Under FDIC rules, if our subsidiary bank ceases to be a “well capitalized” institution for bank regulatory purposes, the interest rates that it pays and its ability to accept brokered deposits may be restricted. At December 31, 2024, we had approximately $614.5 million in wholesale brokered deposits, $23.6 million of in-market CDARs deposits, $2.5 billion of ICS deposits and approximately $53.4 million of deposits related to our prepaid card business, which are considered brokered deposits for regulatory purposes.

We are subject to examination and scrutiny by a number of banking agencies and, depending upon the findings and determinations of these agencies, we may be required to make adjustments to our business that could adversely affect us.

The banking agencies regularly conduct examinations of our business, including compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, a banking agency were to determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, asset concentration, earning prospects, management, liquidity, sensitivity to market risk, consumer compliance, or other aspects of any of our operations has become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management is in violation of any law or regulation, it could take a number or different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to change the asset composition of our portfolio or balance sheet, to assess civil money penalties against our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance. If we become subject to such regulatory actions, our business, results of operations and reputation may be negatively impacted.

The Company and other large banking organizations are becoming subject to increased scrutiny, more intense supervision and regulation, and a higher risk of enforcement action, with increased fines and penalties, which we expect to continue. We expect that our businesses will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision.

​

46

The Bank is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations, and any deemed deficiency by the Bank with respect to these laws could result in significant liability and have material impact on our business strategy.

The BSA and its implementing regulations require financial institutions to, among other duties, implement and maintain an effective AML compliance program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports when appropriate. The Bank is also subject to increased scrutiny from OFAC with respect to its compliance with the U.S. economic sanctions laws and regulations, which include, among other things, the prohibition against dealing with, and the need to block or freeze assets of, persons that are the subject of U.S. economic sanctions. Please see Item I – Part 1 – “Supervision and Regulation - Anti-Money Laundering Rules” and Item 1 – Part 1 – “Supervision and Regulation - OFAC Regulation” for further information regarding the Bank’s obligations under the BSA and its implementing regulations and U.S. economic sanctions laws and regulations, respectively.

If the Bank’s policies, procedures, and systems are deemed deficient, or the policies, procedures and systems of the financial institutions that we have already acquired or may acquire in the future are deficient, the Bank could be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on its ability to pay dividends and the necessity and ability to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of its business plan, including acquisition plans. Failure to maintain and implement an effective AML compliance program could also have serious reputational consequences for the Bank. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.

The Bank is subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties and other sanctions.

The CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and other fair lending laws and regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The U.S. DOJ and other federal agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA or fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion, and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.

Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition.

The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as our subsidiary Bank, up to applicable limits. The amount of a particular institution’s deposit insurance assessment is based on that institution’s risk classification under an FDIC risk-based assessment system. The assessment base on which the Bank’s deposit insurance premiums is paid to the FDIC has been calculated based on its average consolidated total assets less its average equity. However, effective January 1, 2019, which was following the fourth consecutive quarter where the Bank’s total consolidated assets exceeded $10 billion, the FDIC started to use a performance score and loss-severity score to calculate the Bank’s initial FDIC assessment rate. An institution’s risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the institution poses to its regulators. While our risk management processes are designed to reduce risk by maintaining capital levels and mitigating any supervisory concerns, we may be unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance in the event of a new economic downturn and an increase in financial institution failures. For example, we incurred a special assessment of approximately $30 million by the FDIC to help recoup losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund resulting from bank failures in 2023. Any future increases in assessments or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums may materially adversely affect results of operations, including by reducing our profitability or limiting our ability to pursue business opportunities.

​

47

The Federal Reserve may require us to commit capital resources to support the Bank.

Applicable law and the Federal Reserve require a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to a subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the “source of strength” doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to such a subsidiary bank. Under these requirements, in the future, we could be required to provide financial assistance to our Bank if it experiences financial distress.

A capital injection may be required at times when we do not have the resources to provide it, and therefore we may be required to borrow the funds. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank. Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of the holding company’s general unsecured creditors, including the holders of its note obligations. Thus, any borrowing that must be done by any holding company in order to make the required capital injection into a bank is difficult and expensive and will adversely impact the holding company’s cash flows, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We could be subject to changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations or challenges to our income tax provision.

We compute our income tax provision based on enacted tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Any change in enacted tax laws, rules or regulatory or judicial interpretations, or any change in the pronouncements relating to accounting for income taxes could adversely affect our effective tax rate, tax payments and results of operations. The taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our tax positions, which could increase our effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations. We are subject to audit and review by U.S. federal and state tax authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, changes in enacted tax laws, such as adoption of a lower income tax rate in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate, could impact our ability to obtain the future tax benefits represented by our deferred tax assets. In addition, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other liabilities requires significant judgment by management. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity, which could increase the cost of doing business, compliance risks and potential liability.

We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations relating to the data privacy and cybersecurity of the personal information of customers, employees or others, and any failure to comply with these laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations could expose us to liability and reputational damage. As new data privacy and cybersecurity-related laws, regulations, rules and standards are implemented, the time and resources needed for us to comply with such laws, regulations, rules and standards as well as our potential liability for non-compliance and reporting obligations in the case of cyber-attacks, information security breaches, or other similar incidents, may significantly increase. Compliance with these laws, regulations, rules and standards may require us to change our policies, procedures and technology for information security and segregation of data, which could, among other things, make us more vulnerable to operational failures and to monetary penalties for breach of such laws, regulations, rules and standards.

​

48

For example, we are subject to federal laws, rules, regulations and standards, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLBA”), which require financial institutions to, among other things, periodically disclose their privacy policies and practices relating to sharing personal information and enable retail customers to opt out of our ability to share such personal information with unaffiliated third parties under certain circumstances. Such laws and regulations also require financial institutions to implement a comprehensive cybersecurity program that includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information. An amendment to Regulation S-P, an implementing regulation promulgated under the GLBA, was adopted by the SEC on May 16, 2024 and requires broker-dealers and registered investment advisers to, among other things, adopt and implement an incident response program as part of their formal cybersecurity policies and procedures and report data breaches to affected individuals whose sensitive customer information was, or is reasonably likely to have been, accessed or used without authorization within 30 days of becoming aware of such breach. The Bank is also subject to rules and regulations issued by the Federal Trade Commission, which regulates unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including with respect to data privacy and cybersecurity. Additionally, like other lenders, the Bank uses credit bureau data in its underwriting activities. Use of such data is regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which also regulates reporting information to credit bureaus, prescreening individuals for credit offers, sharing of information between affiliates, and using affiliate data for marketing purposes. Similar state laws may impose additional requirements on us and our subsidiaries. The federal government also is considering, and may pass, additional data privacy and cybersecurity legislation, to which we may become subject if passed.

We also are subject to federal regulations that, among other things, require a banking organization to notify its primary federal regulators as soon as possible and within 36 hours after identifying a “computer-security incident” that has materially disrupted or degraded, or the banking organization believes in good faith is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade its business or operations in a manner that would, among other things, jeopardize the viability of its operations, result in customers being unable to access their deposit and other accounts, result in a material loss of revenue, profit or franchise value, or pose a threat to the financial stability of the U.S. financial sector. Additionally, the federal banking regulators, as well as the SEC and related self-regulatory organizations, regularly issue guidance regarding cybersecurity that is intended to enhance cyber risk management among financial institutions.

Data privacy and cybersecurity are also areas of increasing state legislative focus. For example, the CCPA, among other things, gives California residents certain rights with respect to their personal information. Similar laws have been or may be adopted by other states where we do business or from which we collect personal information. In addition, laws in all 50 U.S. states generally require businesses to provide notice under certain circumstances to individuals whose personal information has been disclosed as a result of a data breach.

Certain state laws and regulations may be more stringent, broader in scope, or offer greater individual rights, with respect to personal information than federal or other state laws and regulations, and such laws and regulations may differ from each other, which may complicate compliance efforts and increase compliance costs. Aspects of the CCPA and other federal and state laws and regulations relating to data privacy and cybersecurity, as well as their enforcement, remain unclear, and we may be required to modify our practices in an effort to comply with them.

Further, while we strive to publish and prominently display privacy policies that are accurate, comprehensive, and compliant with applicable laws, regulations, rules and industry standards, we cannot ensure that our privacy policies and other statements regarding our practices will be sufficient to protect us from claims, proceedings, liability or adverse publicity relating to data privacy or cybersecurity. Although we endeavor to comply with our privacy policies, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged to have failed to do so. The publication of our privacy policies and other documentation that provide promises and assurances about data privacy and cybersecurity can subject us to potential federal or state action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Additional risks could arise in connection with any failure or perceived failure by us, our service providers or other third parties with which we do business to provide adequate disclosure or transparency to our customers about the personal information collected from them and its use, to receive, document or honor the privacy preferences expressed by our customers, to protect personal information from unauthorized disclosure, or to maintain proper training on privacy practices for all employees or third parties who have access to personal information in our possession or control.

49

Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our privacy policies, or applicable data privacy and cybersecurity laws, regulations, rules, standards or contractual obligations, or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access to, or unauthorized loss, destruction, use, modification, acquisition, disclosure, release or transfer of personal information, may result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices, the expenditure of substantial costs, time and other resources, proceedings or actions against us, legal liability, governmental investigations, enforcement actions, claims, fines, judgments, awards, penalties, sanctions and costly litigation (including class actions). Any of the foregoing could harm our reputation, distract our management and technical personnel, increase our costs of doing business, adversely affect the demand for our products and services, and ultimately result in the imposition of liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For further discussion of the data privacy and cybersecurity laws, regulations, rules and standards we are, or may in the future become, subject to, see Part I – Item 1 – “Supervision and Regulation – Data Privacy and Cybersecurity.”

Risks relating to our Common Stock

State law and provisions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws could make it more difficult for another company to purchase us, even though such a purchase may increase shareholder value.

In many cases, shareholders may receive a premium for their shares if we are purchased by another company. State law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for anyone to purchase us without the approval of our Board of Directors.

Our articles of incorporation provide that a merger, exchange or consolidation of the Company with, or the sale, exchange or lease of all or substantially all of our assets to, any person or entity (referred to herein as a “Fundamental Change”), must be approved by the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding voting stock if the Board of Directors does not recommend a vote in favor of the Fundamental Change. The articles of incorporation further provide that a Fundamental Change involving a shareholder that owns or controls 20% or more of our voting stock at the time of the proposed transaction (a “Controlling Party”) must be approved by the holders of at least (i) 80% of our outstanding voting stock, and (ii) 67% of our outstanding voting stock held by shareholders other than the Controlling Party, unless (a) the transaction has been recommended to the shareholders by a majority of the entire Board of Directors or (b) the consideration per share to be received by our shareholders generally is not less than the highest price per share paid by the Controlling Party in the acquisition of its holdings of our common stock during the preceding three years. The approval by the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding voting stock is required to amend or repeal these provisions contained in our articles of incorporation. Finally, in the event that any such Fundamental Change is not recommended by the Board of Directors, the holders of at least 80% of our outstanding voting stock must attend a meeting called to address such transaction, in person or by proxy, in order for a quorum for the conduct of business to exist. If the 80% and 67% vote requirements described above do not apply because the Board of Directors recommends the transaction or the consideration is deemed fair, as applicable, then pursuant to the provisions of the South Carolina Business Corporation Act, the Fundamental Change generally must be approved by two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast with respect thereto. Consequently, a takeover attempt may prove difficult, and shareholders may not realize the highest possible price for their securities.

As part of its shareholder proposals to be considered at its 2025 Annual Shareholder Meeting, the Company is proposing to change its state of domicile from South Carolina to Florida and to follow Florida law with respect to approvals required for approval of a Fundamental Change. Florida law requires that shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding common stock of the Company approve a Fundamental Change, as opposed to South Carolina’s more onerous statute requiring shareholders of two-thirds of the outstanding common stock approve a Fundamental Change. While this change will make it easier for the Company to undertake a Fundamental Change, we can give no assurance the shareholders will approve the proposal or that the proposed reincorporation will take place. If the proposal is rejected, the Company may face challenges in executing mergers, acquisitions, or restructurings due to stricter approval requirements. If approved, differences in Florida law could impact shareholder rights, governance structures, and regulatory compliance. Additionally, the transition may involve legal, tax, or administrative costs, and the anticipated benefits may not materialize. Any delays or legal challenges could create uncertainty, impacting the Company’s strategic initiatives and stock performance

​

50

Shares of our Common Stock are not insured deposits and may lose value.

Shares of our common stock are not savings or deposit accounts and are not insured by the FDIC, or any other agency or private entity. Such shares are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of some or all of the value of your investment.

Future capital needs could result in dilution of shareholder investment.

Our Board of Directors may determine from time to time that there is a need to obtain additional capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other securities. These issuances would dilute the ownership interest of our shareholders and may dilute the per share book value of our common stock. New investors also may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our shareholders which may adversely impact our shareholders.

The trading volume in our common stock and the sale of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market could depress the price of our common stock.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of our common stock in the market, or availability of shares of our common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of our common stock. Our stock price can fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors. General market fluctuations, industry factors, and general economic and political conditions and events, such as terrorist attacks, economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, tax rate changes, credit loss trends, or currency fluctuations, also could cause our stock price to decrease regardless of operating results. We therefore can give no assurance that sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the market, or the potential for large amounts of sales in the market, or any of the other factors discussed above, would not cause the price of our common stock to decline or impair our ability to raise capital through sales of our common stock.

Our ability to pay dividends is limited and we may be unable to pay future dividends.

Our ability to pay dividends is limited by regulatory restrictions and the need to maintain sufficient consolidated capital. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to us is limited by its obligations to maintain sufficient capital and by other general restrictions on its dividends that are applicable to national banks that are regulated by the OCC. For information on these regulatory restrictions on the right of the Bank to pay dividends to us and on the right of the Company to pay dividends to its shareholders, see Part I - Item 1 – “Supervision and Regulation - Dividend Restrictions.” If we do not satisfy these regulatory requirements, or if the Bank does not have sufficient earnings to make payments to us while maintaining adequate capital levels, we will be unable to pay dividends on our common stock.

Holders of our junior subordinated debentures have rights that are senior to those of our common shareholders.

We have helped support our continued growth through the issuance of, and the acquisition of, through prior mergers, trust preferred securities from special purpose trusts and accompanying junior subordinated debentures. As of December 31, 2024, we had outstanding trust preferred securities and accompanying junior subordinated debentures totaling $117.9 million, net of fair value adjustments. Payments of the principal and interest on these debt instruments are conditionally guaranteed by us. Further, the accompanying junior subordinated debentures we issued to the special purpose trusts are senior to our shares of common stock. As a result, we must make payments on the junior subordinated debentures before any dividends can be paid on our common stock and, in the event of our bankruptcy, dissolution or liquidation, the holders of the junior subordinated debentures must be satisfied before any distributions can be made on our common stock. We have the right to defer distributions on our junior subordinated debentures (and the related trust preferred securities) for up to five years, during which time no dividends may be paid on our common stock.

​

51

Our stock price may be volatile, which could result in losses to our investors and litigation against us.

Our stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include but are not limited to: actual or anticipated variations in earnings; changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections; our announcement of developments related to our businesses, operations and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers; new technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors; news reports of trends, concerns, irrational exuberance on the part of investors, and other issues related to the financial services industry. Our stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to our performance. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the financial institutions sector, could adversely affect the price of the Company’s common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for our investors to resell their common stock when they desire and at prices they find attractive. Moreover, in the past, securities class action lawsuits have been instituted against some companies following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We could in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our normal business.

At December 31, 2024, our shareholders included three funds owning approximately 29% of our common stock and they may exercise significant influence over us and their interests may be different from our other shareholders.

Based on their 13G forms filed for the year end December 31, 2024, our shareholders include three funds that collectively own approximately 29% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. The top ten institutional owners collectively own approximately 50% of our outstanding shares of common stock, as reported by S&P Global. While the federal banking laws require prior bank regulatory approval if shareholders owning in excess of 9.9% of a financial holding company’s outstanding voting shares desire to act in concert, these institutional owners nonetheless could vote the same way on matters submitted to our shareholders without being deemed to be acting in concert and, if so, could exercise significant influence over us and actions taken by our shareholders. Interests of institutional funds may be different from our other shareholders. Accordingly, given their collective ownership, the funds could have significant influence over whether or not a proposal submitted to our shareholders receives required shareholder approval.

Risks relating to Economic Conditions and other Outside Forces

The political and economic environment could materially impact our business operations and financial performance, and uncertainty surrounding the potential legal, regulatory and policy changes by a possible new U.S. presidential administration may directly affect financial institutions and the global economy

The political and economic environment in the United States and elsewhere has resulted in and will continue to result in some uncertainty. Changing regulatory policies because of the changing political environment, could impact our regulatory and compliance costs and expected revenues, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Additionally, financial markets may be adversely affected by fiscal or monetary policies established by central banks and financial regulators, uncertainty concerning government shutdowns, debt ceilings or funding for the government, actual or perceived instability in the U.S. banking system, and the current or anticipated impact of geopolitical instability of conflict, including in the Middle East, Ukraine, and Taiwan, as well as terrorism and other geopolitical events.

Further, the change in the U.S. presidential administration and congressional seat turnover following the 2024 election cycle may result in increased regulatory uncertainty. Changes in federal policy by the executive branch and regulatory agencies may occur over time through the new presidential administration’s and/or Congress’s policy and personnel changes, which could lead to changes involving the level of oversight and focus on the financial services industry; however, the nature, timing and economic and political effects of such potential changes remain highly uncertain. At this time, it is unclear what laws, regulations and policies may change and whether future changes or uncertainty surrounding future changes will adversely affect our operating environment and therefore our business, financial condition and results of operations.

​

52

Changes and instability in global economic conditions and geopolitical matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations have been in the past and may, in the future, be materially affected by global economic conditions and geopolitical matters, including, both directly and indirectly, through the impact on client activity levels. The macroeconomic environment in the United States is susceptible to global events and volatility in the financial markets. Global economic and political developments, such as the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, increased global trade and other multinational tensions, including possible tariffs or other trade disruptions; and other global events, have adverse consequences that impact the macroeconomic environment, and these impacts may persist for some time, including disruptions of global supply chains, cross-border migration trends, labor gluts or shortages, increased energy prices, inflationary pressures and higher interest rates. Changes in the global economic and geopolitical environment have resulted in significant adverse effects for many different types of businesses nationwide and in the regions in which we operate, which could adversely impact economic and market conditions for the Company and its clients and counterparties.

The impacts of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate increases have dampened loan demand, and global events and geopolitical tensions could cause economic disruption which may result in further declines in demand for our banking products and services, and could negatively impact, among other things, our liquidity, regulatory capital, goodwill and our growth strategy. Developments related to the U.S. federal debt ceiling, including the possibility of a government shutdown, default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, or related credit-rating downgrades, could have adverse effects on the broader economy, disrupt access to capital markets, and contribute to, or worsen, an economic recession. In addition, our net interest margin has been flat to decreasing in 2024 in response to competitive pressure to increase interest rates on deposits in order to retain our funding base faster than increasing the interest rate on our loans, thereby increasing our costs and reducing our revenues. In addition, increases in our loan pricing impacts our borrowers’ ability to repay existing loans or refinance loans as they become due, which could influence the recognition of credit losses on loans and securities and increase the allowance for credit losses, result in additional lost revenue, cause additional increases in expenses, result in goodwill impairment charges, result in the impairment of other financial and nonfinancial assets, and increase the Company’s cost of capital. Any one or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A slowdown in economic growth or a resumption of recessionary economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business in the future.

The economy is subject to worldwide events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and Europe, as well as domestic events, any or all of which could impact inflationary pressures and interest rates to dampen demand, and these and other political and market developments are affecting and could continue to affect consumer confidence levels and cause adverse changes in loan payment patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which may impact our charge-offs and the provision for credit losses. Changes in the financial services industry and the effects of current and future law and regulations that may be imposed in response to future market developments also could negatively affect us by restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell loans, and adversely impact our financial performance.

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

Our ability to engage in routine funding and other transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. Defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and losses of depositor, creditor and counterparty confidence and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. We could experience increases in deposits and assets as a result of other banks’ difficulties or failure, which would increase the capital we need to support our growth.

​

53

We may be impacted by actual or perceived soundness of other financial institutions, including as a result of the financial or operational failure of a major financial institution, or concerns about the creditworthiness of such a financial institution or its ability to fulfill its obligations, which can cause substantial and cascading disruption within the financial markets and increased expenses, including FDIC insurance premiums, and could affect our ability to attract and retain depositors and to borrow or raise capital. For example, during 2023 the FDIC took control and was appointed receiver of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank. In addition, adverse developments with respect to third parties with whom we have important relationships could also negatively impact perceptions about us. These perceptions about us could cause our business to be negatively affected and exacerbate the other risks that we face. The failure of other banks and financial institutions and the measures taken by governments, businesses and other organizations in response to these events could adversely impact the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to the success of the local economies where we operate.

Our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits and housing starts in our primary and secondary markets. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally become challenging, our business may be adversely affected. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. We cannot give any assurance we will continue to benefit from market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas if they do occur.

Natural disasters, adverse weather or manmade events could negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations, which would have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Our current market areas are in Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Virginia, and Alabama, and following the IBTX Merger, Texas and Colorado. These regions are susceptible to hurricanes, tropical storms, severe thunderstorms and hail, and related flooding and wind damage as well as blizzards, snowstorms, tornados and other types of strong storms. While three storms in 2024 impacted our market area with little disruption in business, these types of weather events may increase in frequency or intensity because of changes in weather patterns and other factors including climate change. In addition, many of our customers have incurred, or may in the future incur, significantly higher property and casualty insurance premiums on their properties located in our markets, which may adversely affect real estate sales and values in those markets.

Natural disasters, adverse weather events and manmade events could in the future disrupt our operations, result in damage to properties and negatively affect the local economies in the markets where we operate. We cannot predict whether or to what extent damage that may be caused by future natural disasters, adverse weather events or manmade events will affect our operations or the economies in our current or future market areas. Such events could result in a decline in loan originations, a decline in the value or destruction of properties securing our loans, as well as our own properties, and an increase in delinquencies, bankruptcies, foreclosures or loan losses that could result in a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, and provision for loan losses. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of future natural disasters, adverse weather events or manmade events.

We are subject to physical and financial risks associated with climate change and other weather and natural disaster impacts.

There continues to be concern over the current and anticipated effects of climate change. These concerns over the anticipated and unanticipated impacts of climate change (including physical risk and transition risk) have led to, and will continue to lead to, governmental efforts to mitigate those impacts. In recent years, governments across the world have entered into international agreements to attempt to reduce global temperatures, in part by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Although the U.S. is taking steps to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies have continued to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change, each of which may result in the imposition of taxes and fees, the required purchase of emission credits, and the implementation of significant operational changes, which may require us to expend significant capital and incur compliance, operating, maintenance and remediation costs. In addition, the methodologies and data used to manage and monitor climate risk continue to evolve. Climate-related data, particularly greenhouse gas emissions for clients and counterparties, remains limited in availability and varies in quality. As a result, it is difficult to predict how climate change may impact our financial condition and operations; however, as a banking organization, the physical effects of climate change on the Bank may present certain unique risks.

54

The physical risks of climate change include longer-term shifts in climate patterns, such as extreme heat, sea level rise, and more frequent and prolonged drought. Weather events such as flooding, hurricanes and wildfires may increase from longer term climate change. Physical risks may alter the Company’s strategic direction to mitigate certain financial risks. A significant portion of our operations is located in the areas bordering the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean, regions that are susceptible to hurricanes, or in areas of the Southern U.S. that are susceptible to tornadoes and other severe weather events including severe droughts, floods, and sea level rise. Any of these, or any other severe weather event, could cause disruption to our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our overall business, results of operations or financial condition. We have taken certain preemptive measures that we believe will mitigate these adverse effects; however, such measures cannot prevent or mitigate the disruption that a catastrophic earthquake, fire, hurricane, tornado or other severe weather event could cause to the markets that we serve and any resulting adverse impact on our customers, such as hindering our borrowers’ ability to timely repay their loans, diminishing the value of any collateral held by us, interrupting supply chains, causing significant property damage, causing us to incur additional expense or resulting in a loss of revenue, and affecting the stability of our deposit base. The severity and impact of future earthquakes, fires, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, sea level rise, floods, hail and snowstorms, and other weather-related events are difficult to predict and may be exacerbated by global climate change. Such events may also cause reductions in regional and local economic activity that may have an adverse effect on our customers, which could limit our ability to raise and invest capital in these areas and communities, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Climate change may worsen the frequency and severity of weather events natural disasters such as fires, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, sea level rise, floods, hail and snowstorms and other extreme weather-related events that could cause disruption to our business and operations. Chronic results of climate change such as shifting weather patterns could also cause disruption to our business and operations. Climate change may also result in new and/or more stringent regulatory requirements for the Company, which could materially affect the Company’s results of operations by requiring the Company to take costly measures to comply with any new laws or regulations related to climate change that may be forthcoming.

Transition risks of climate change include policy, legal, technology and market changes. Examples of these transition risks include new regulations, shifts in customer behaviors, supply chain disruptions or breakthroughs in technologies that accelerate the transition to a lower carbon economy. Any of these risks may negatively affect certain sectors and borrowers in our loan portfolio, impacting their ability to timely repay their loans or decreasing the value of any collateral held by us. Transition risk resulting from our customers retooling their businesses to transition from reliance on fossil fuels to cleaner energy also may impact the Bank. While loan demand to facilitate that transition may increase, some businesses may not have the financial capacity to make those changes, impacting their ability to timely repay their loans or decreasing the value of any collateral held by us, which may adversely impact our results of operations.

The Company faces potential reputational risks as a result of its practices related to climate change, including as a result of the Company’s direct or indirect involvement in certain industries, as well as any decisions management makes in response to managing climate risk, especially as views on climate-related matters become subject to increased polarization. Further, there is increased scrutiny of climate change-related policies, goals, and disclosures, which could result in litigation and regulatory investigations and actions. We may incur additional costs and require additional resources as we evolve our strategy, practices and related disclosures with respect to these matters. In addition, California has passed climate disclosure laws that are applicable to companies (such as the Company) that have more than $1 billion in annual revenues and operations in California. While the Company has established a corporate stewardship program and a climate risk steering committee and is in the process of determining its Scope 1 and 2 emissions to comply with these laws, these laws will require material investment by the Company to fully implement. Legislative or regulatory change regarding sustainability, stewardship and governance or climate-related risks or disclosures, including inconsistent requirements and uncertainties, could result in loss of revenue or increased credit, compliance, reputational and other risks and costs.

Market volatility could adversely affect our operations or ability to access capital.

The capital and credit markets have experienced volatility and disruption from time to time during the past several years. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial condition or performance. If these periodic market disruptions and volatility continue or worsen, we may experience adverse effects, which may be material, on our ability to maintain or access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

55

Competition from financial institutions and other financial service providers may adversely affect our profitability.

The banking business is highly competitive and we experience competition in our markets from many other financial institutions. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds, and other mutual funds, as well as other super-regional, national and international financial institutions and fintech or e-commerce companies that operate in our primary market areas and elsewhere. Some of these competitors may have a long history of successful operation in our markets, greater ties to local businesses and more expansive banking relationships, as well as better established depositor bases. Competitors with greater resources or more advanced technology may possess an advantage by being capable of maintaining numerous and more convenient banking locations, easy to use and available mobile and computer apps or Internet platforms, operating more ATMs and conducting extensive promotional and advertising campaigns.

We compete with these institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans. In addition, we have to attract our customer base from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. Many of our competitors are well-established, larger financial institutions and credit unions. While we believe we can and do successfully compete with these other financial institutions in our primary markets, we may face a competitive disadvantage as a result of our smaller size, lack of geographic diversification, sophisticated online or mobile applications, and inability to spread our marketing costs across a broader market. Although we compete by concentrating our marketing efforts in our primary markets with local advertisements, personal contacts, and greater flexibility and responsiveness in working with local customers, we can give no assurance this strategy will be successful.

The fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of money and credit in the U.S. as its policies determine in large part the cost of funds for lending and investing and return earned on those loans and investments, both of which affect our net interest margin. They can also materially decrease the value of financial assets we hold. Federal Reserve policies also can adversely affect borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans, or could result in volatile markets and rapid declining collateral values. Changes in Federal Reserve policies are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Accordingly, the impact of these changes on our activities and results of operations is difficult to predict.

We are or may become involved from time to time in suits, legal proceedings, information-gathering requests, investigations, and proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies that may lead to adverse consequences.

Many aspects of the banking business involve a substantial risk of legal liability. The Company and the Bank have been named or threatened to be named as defendants in various lawsuits arising from our business activities (and in some cases from the activities of companies that we have acquired). In addition, from time to time, we are, or may become, the subject of information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings, and other forms of regulatory inquiry, including by bank regulatory agencies, the SEC, self-regulatory organizations and law enforcement authorities. The results of such proceedings could lead to significant civil or criminal penalties, including monetary penalties, damages, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restrictions on the way the Company and the Bank conduct their business, or reputational harm.

56

In addition to assessing our own cybersecurity preparedness, we also identify, evaluate and manage cybersecurity risks associated with use of third-party vendors and service providers. Our third-party risk function conducts an annual review of third-party hosted applications with a specific focus on any sensitive data shared with third parties. Our information security area regularly reviews third-party vendors and service providers, including their System and Organization Controls (SOC) 1 or SOC 2 report. If a third-party vendor or service provider is not able to provide a SOC 1 or SOC 2 report, we take additional steps to assess its cybersecurity preparedness and assess our relationship on that basis. The frequency and granularity of our review of third-party vendors and service providers is based on an assigned risk rating for each third-party vendor and service provider. Our assessment of risks associated with use of third-party vendors and service providers is part of our overall cybersecurity risk management framework.

​

The Board has ultimate oversight responsibility for the Company’s risk management and recognizes the importance of protecting the data provided by the Company’s customers and employees and devotes considerable time and attention to overseeing the strategies the Company employs to protect our data and systems and to mitigate against cybersecurity risk. A cybersecurity expert chairs the Risk Committee and provides technology-related insight and guidance to the Company. As part of the Risk Committee’s responsibility for monitoring key business and regulatory risks, the Risk Committee receives from both our Chief Information Officer and CISO quarterly reports and materials which include a review of cybersecurity and information technology key risk indicators, test results and related remediation, and any recent cybersecurity threats or incidents and how the Company is managing those threats or incidents. The Risk Committee also periodically reviews reports on the threat environment, vulnerability assessments, results of penetration testing, and potential cybersecurity and data privacy incidents, as well as information on ongoing employee training relating to data privacy and cybersecurity and how to protect data against cyber threats. Further, on a quarterly basis, our CRO presents to the Risk Committee updates from our Director of Enterprise and Operational Management on the Company’s business continuity program, which covers, among other things, outages and incidences and disaster recovery and business continuity testing. The Risk Committee also approves the annual risk assessment required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Moreover, the CISO follows a risk-based escalation process to notify the Risk Committee outside of the cycle of regular updates when management has identified an emerging risk or material issue related to cybersecurity. The Risk Committee also reports material cybersecurity risks to the full Board, based on our CISO’s assessment of risk. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews reports of the Company’s internal audit department’s periodic audits of our information security area and various components thereof.

​

We face a number of cybersecurity risks in connection with our business and we have, from time to time, experienced threats to and incidents involving our data and systems. For more information about the cybersecurity risks we face, see the risk factors captioned “We are subject to complex and evolving laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity, which could increase the cost of doing business, compliance risks and potential liability” and “We face cybersecurity risks from cyber-attacks, information security breaches and other similar incidents that could result in the disclosure of confidential and other information (including personal information), adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.” In Item 1A- Risk Factors.

58

On January 1, 2025, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Independent Bank Group, Inc. (“Independent”), a Texas corporation, in a stock transaction. Upon the closing of the merger, the Company acquired Independent’s 92 branch locations, which are located in Texas and Colorado.

In addition, on January 8, 2025, the Bank entered into an agreement for the purchase and sale of real property with entities affiliated with Blue Owl Real Estate Capital LLC, providing for the sale to entities affiliated with Blue Owl of certain bank branch properties owned and operated by the Bank. The branch properties are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. Under the sale agreement, the Bank has agreed, concurrently with the closing of the sale of the branches, to enter into triple net lease agreements with entities affiliated with Blue Owl, pursuant to which the Bank will lease each of the branches. The Company expects the sale-leaseback transaction to close in the first quarter of 2025 and is subject to Blue Owl performing satisfactory due diligence on the branches.

For additional information relating to the Company’s acquisition of Independent and the sale-leaseback agreement with entities affiliated with Blue Owl, see accompanying with Note 30 – Subsequent Events to our audited consolidated financial statements.

59

Dividends

We currently intend to continue to pay comparable quarterly cash dividends on our common stock, subject to approval by our Board of Directors, although we may elect not to pay dividends or to change the amount of such dividends. The payment of dividends is a decision by our Board of Directors based upon then-existing circumstances, including our rate of growth, profitability, financial condition, existing and anticipated capital requirements, the amount of funds legally available for the payment of cash dividends, regulatory constraints and such other factors as the Board of Directors determines relevant.

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. Federal Reserve policy places certain restrictions on our ability pay dividends to our shareholders and Federal bank regulators have also placed restrictions on the Bank’s ability to transfer funds to SouthState in the form of cash dividends. These restrictions are described under Part I - Item 1 – “Supervision and Regulation – Dividend Restrictions.”

​

We pay cash dividends to our shareholders from our assets, which are provided primarily by dividends paid to SouthState by our Bank. Certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to SouthState in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances, as described under Part I - Item 1 – “Supervision and Regulation – Dividend Restrictions.” Federal bank regulators have stated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice and that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only out of current earnings. The approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. During 2024, the Bank paid dividends to SouthState totaling $168.0 million. We used these funds primarily to pay dividends to shareholders of approximately $161.6 million in 2024.

60

Repurchases of Equity Securities

In January 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the authorization of a 3,500,000 share Company stock repurchase plan (the “2021 Stock Repurchase Plan”). During 2021 and through December 31, 2022, we repurchased 3,129,979 shares under the 2021 Stock Repurchase Plan, at an average price of $81.97 per share (excluding cost of commissions) for a total of $256.6 million. Of this amount, we repurchased 1,312,038 shares, at an average price of $83.99 per share (excluding cost of commissions) for a total of $110.2 million during 2022.

​

​

61

On April 27, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program (“2022 Stock Repurchase Program”) authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 3,750,000 of the Company’s common shares along with the remaining authorized shares of 370,021 from the 2021 Stock Repurchase Plan for a total authorization of 4,120,021 shares. On June 7, 2022, the Company received Federal Reserve Board’s supervisory nonobjection on the 2022 Stock Repurchase Program. Shares of common stock under the 2022 Stock Repurchase Program may be repurchased periodically in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. The actual means and timing of any repurchases, target number of shares and prices or range of prices under the 2022 Stock Repurchase Program may be determined by us in our discretion and depend on a number of factors, including the market price of our common stock, share issuances under our equity plans, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. In 2022, the Company did not repurchase any shares through the 2022 Stock Repurchase Program. The Company repurchased a total of 100,000 shares at a weighted average price of $67.48 per share in 2023, and a total of 100,000 shares at a weighted average price of $79.85 per share in 2024 pursuant to the 2022 Stock Repurchase Program. As of December 31, 2024, the 2022 Stock Repurchase Plan expired. For the new 2025 Stock Repurchase Program, see accompanying Note 30—Subsequent Events to our audited consolidated financial statements.

​

The following table reflects our share repurchase activity during the fourth quarter of 2024:

62

The following section also identifies significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and the other information included in this Report.

Overview

SouthState Corporation is a financial holding company headquartered in Winter Haven, Florida, and was incorporated under the laws of South Carolina in 1985. We provide a wide range of banking services and products to our customers through our Bank. The Bank operates SouthState|Duncan-Williams Securities Corp. (“SouthState|Duncan-Williams”), a registered broker-dealer headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee that serves primarily institutional clients across the U.S. in the fixed income business. The Bank also operates SouthState Advisory, Inc., a wholly-owned registered investment advisor. The Bank, through its Corporate Billing Division, provides factoring, invoicing, collection and accounts receivable management services to transportation companies and automotive parts and service providers nationwide. In 2023, the Bank formed SSB First Street Corporation, an investment subsidiary headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, to hold tax-exempt municipal investment securities as part of the Bank’s investment portfolio. The holding company also owns SSB Insurance Corp., a captive insurance subsidiary pursuant to Section 831(b) of the U.S. Tax Code.

​

At December 31, 2024, we had $46.4 billion in assets and 5,100 full-time equivalent employees. Through our Bank branches, ATMs and online banking platforms, we provide our customers with a wide range of financial products and services, through a six (6) state footprint in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. These financial products and services include deposit accounts such as checking accounts, savings and time deposits of various types, safe deposit boxes, bank money orders, wire transfer and ACH services, brokerage services and alternative investment products such as annuities and mutual funds, trust and asset management services, loans of all types, including business loans, agriculture loans, real estate-secured (mortgage) loans, personal use loans, home improvement loans, automobile loans, manufactured housing loans, boat loans, credit cards, letters of credit, home equity lines of credit, treasury management services, and merchant services.

​

We also operate a correspondent banking and capital markets division within our national bank subsidiary, of which the majority of its bond salesmen, traders and operational personnel are housed in facilities located in Atlanta, Georgia, Memphis, Tennessee, Walnut Creek, California, and Birmingham, Alabama. This division’s primary revenue generating activities are related to its capital markets division, which includes commissions earned on fixed income security sales, fees from hedging services, loan brokerage fees and consulting fees for services related to these activities; and its correspondent banking division, which includes spread income earned on correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and correspondent bank checking account deposits and fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, asset/liability consulting related activities, international wires, and other clearing and corporate checking account services.

​

We earned net income of $534.8 million, or $6.97 diluted earnings per share (“EPS”), during 2024 compared to net income of $494.3 million, or $6.46 diluted EPS, in 2023. Net income available to the common shareholders was up $40.5 million, or 8.2%, in 2024 compared to 2023. For further discussion of the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, see Results of Operations section of this MD&A starting on page 68.

​

At December 31, 2024, we had total assets of approximately $46.4 billion compared to approximately $44.9 billion at December 31, 2023. See the Financial Condition section of this MD&A starting on page 77 for a more detailed description of the change in our balance sheet.

​

​

​

64

Our overall asset quality results remained strong during the year. Net charge offs as a percentage of average loans decreased to 0.06% compared to 0.08% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The total nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) increased by $29.2 million to $213.4 million at December 31, 2024 from $184.1 million at December 31, 2023. Non-acquired NPAs increased $24.0 million to $146.5 million at December 31, 2024 from $122.5 million at December 31, 2023, which was related to an increase in non-acquired nonperforming loans of $23.5 million. Non-acquired OREO and other NPAs increased by $471,000 to $1.2 million as of December 31, 2024 compared to $711,000 as of December 31, 2023. Acquired NPAs increased $5.3 million to $66.9 million at December 31, 2024 from $61.6 million at December 31, 2023. Acquired nonperforming loans increased $4.4 million and acquired OREO and other nonperforming assets increased $871,000. Total NPAs as a percentage of total assets increased 5 basis points to 0.46% at December 31, 2024 compared to 0.41% at December 31, 2023. We continue to experience solid and stable asset quality numbers and ratios in 2024.

​

Our efficiency ratio was 56.9% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 55.5% for the same period in 2023. The increase of our efficiency ratio was due to both a $6.9 million increase in noninterest expense and a $21.8 million decrease in total net interest income and noninterest income. The increase in noninterest expense was mainly due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits of $23.5 million, an increase in information service expense of $7.7 million, and an increase in merger, branch consolidation, severance related and other expense of $7.0 million, offset by a decrease in the FDIC special assessment expense of $21.8 million, a decrease in amortization of intangible of $5.2 million, and a decrease in other noninterest expense of $4.9 million in 2024. The decrease in total net interest income and noninterest income was due to a decline in net interest income of $37.2 million as the increase in interest expense exceeded the increase in interest income, as deposits repriced in the higher interest rate environment, along with deposits moving to higher costing money market accounts and interest-bearing checking accounts from noninterest-bearing checking accounts and savings accounts during 2024.

​

We continue to remain well-capitalized with a total risk-based capital ratio of 15.0% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 10.0%, as of December 31, 2024, compared to 14.1% and 9.4%, respectively, at December 31, 2023. The improvement in the total risk-based capital ratio was mainly due to total risk-based capital increasing 8.2% with the increase in equity resulting from net income of $534.8 million recognized in 2024, along with the increase in the allowance for credit losses and unfunded commitments of $20.1 million includable in Tier 2 capital. Total risk-weighted assets increased $657.1 million, or 1.9%, in 2024. The improvement in the Tier 1 leverage ratio was due to the increase in Tier 1 capital of 9.3% with the increase in equity resulting from net income of $534.8 million recognized in 2024. Regulatory average assets used to calculate the Tier 1 leverage ratio increased $1.1 billion, or 2.6%, in 2024. We believe our current capital ratios position us well to grow both organically and through certain strategic opportunities. For further discussion of the Company’s financial condition as of December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023, see Financial Condition section of this MD&A starting on page 77.

Recent Events

Independent Bank Group, Inc. (“Independent”) Merger

​

On January 1, 2025, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Independent, a Texas-based corporation, the bank holding company for Independent Bank, in a stock transaction. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, shareholders of Independent received 0.60 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for each share of Independent stock resulting in the Company issuing 24,858,731 shares of its common stock. In total, the purchase price for Independent was $2.5 billion.

​

Sale-leaseback Transaction

​

On January 8, 2025, the Bank entered into an agreement for the purchase and sale of real property (the “Sale Agreement”) with entities affiliated with Blue Owl Real Estate Capital LLC (“Blue Owl”), providing for the sale to entities affiliated with Blue Owl of certain bank branch properties owned and operated by the Bank. The branch properties are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. Under the Sale Agreement, the Bank has agreed, concurrently with the closing of the sale of the branches, to enter into triple net lease agreements (the “Lease Agreements”) with entities affiliated with Blue Owl, pursuant to which the Bank will lease each of the Branches (the “Sale-leaseback Transaction”). The Company expects the Sale-leaseback Transaction to close in the first quarter of 2025 and is subject to Blue Owl performing satisfactory due diligence on the branches.

​

65

Capital Management

​

On February 11, 2025, the Company received Federal Reserve Board’s supervisory nonobjection on the 2025 stock repurchase program (the “2025 Repurchase Program”), which was previously approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, contingent upon receipt of such supervisory nonobjection. The 2025 Repurchase Program authorizes the Company to repurchase up to 3,000,000 shares, or up to approximately three percent, of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock as of January 2, 2025. See accompanying with Note 30 – Subsequent Events to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and follow general practices within the banking industry. Our financial position and results of operations are affected by management’s application of accounting policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues and expenses. Differences in the application of these policies could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations and related disclosures. Understanding our accounting policies is fundamental to understanding our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, our significant accounting policies and changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our audited consolidated financial statements.

The following is a summary of our critical accounting policies that are highly dependent on estimates, assumptions and judgments.

Business Combinations

​

We account for acquisitions under FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, and liabilities assumed, are recorded at fair value. ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires us to record purchased financial assets with credit deterioration (PCD assets), defined as a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination or issuance, at the purchase price plus the allowance for credit losses expected at the time of acquisition. Under this method, there is no provision for credit losses affecting net income on acquisition of PCD assets. Changes in estimates of expected credit losses after acquisition are recognized as provision for credit loss expense (or recovery of credit losses) in subsequent periods as they arise. Any non-credit discount or premium resulting from acquiring a pool of purchased financial assets with credit deterioration shall be allocated to each individual asset. At the acquisition date, the initial allowance for credit losses determined on a collective basis shall be allocated to individual assets to appropriately allocate any non-credit discount or premium. The non-credit discount or premium, after the adjustment for the allowance for credit losses, shall be accreted into interest income using the interest method based on the effective interest rate determined after the adjustment for credit losses at the adoption date.

​

A purchased financial asset that does not qualify as a PCD asset is accounted for similar to an originated financial asset. Generally, this means that an entity recognizes the allowance for credit losses for non-PCD assets through net income at the time of acquisition. In addition, both the credit discount and non-credit discount or premium resulting from acquiring a pool of purchased financial assets that do not qualify as PCD assets shall be allocated to each individual asset. This combined discount or premium shall be accreted into interest income using the effective yield method.

For further discussion of our loan accounting and acquisitions, see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 2—Mergers and Acquisitions, Note 4—Loans and Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses to the audited consolidated financial statements.

​

​

66

Allowance for Credit Losses or ACL

​

The ACL reflects management’s estimate of the portion of the amortized cost of loans and unfunded commitments that it does not expect to collect. Management has a methodology determining its ACL for loans held for investment and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures. Management considers the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts on the collectability of the loan portfolio. The Company’s estimate of its ACL involves a high degree of judgment; therefore, management’s process for determining expected credit losses may result in a range of expected credit losses. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach a different reasonable conclusion. The Company’s ACL recorded on the balance sheet reflects management’s best estimate within the range of expected credit losses. The Company recognizes in net income the amount needed to adjust the ACL for management’s current estimate of expected credit losses. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further detailed descriptions of our estimation process and methodology related to the ACL. See also Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses and “Provision for Credit Losses” in this MD&A.

One of the most significant judgments influencing the ACL is the macroeconomic forecasts from the third-party service provider. Changes in the economic forecasts may significantly affect the estimated credit losses which may potentially lead to materially different quantitatively modeled allowance levels from one reporting period to the next. Given the dynamic relationship between macroeconomic variables, it is difficult to estimate the impact of a change in any one individual variable on the ACL. SouthState uses a third-party service provider to support the economic forecast assumptions under CECL forecast by providing various levels of economic scenarios. These scenarios are weighted in accordance with management assessment of scenarios as well as expectations of the general market and industry conditions. To illustrate the sensitivity of these scenarios, if a 100% probability weighting was applied to the adverse scenario rather than using the probability-weighted three scenario approach, this would result in an increase in the ACL by approximately $224 million. Conversely, if a 100% probability weighting was applied to the upside scenario, this would result in a decrease in the ACL by approximately $104 million. The adverse scenario includes assumptions including, but not limited to, rising unemployment consistent with a recession, high levels of inflation and weakened consumer and business spending, elevated interest rates, tightening credit, widening Federal deficit, and continued geopolitical tensions. Conversely, the upside scenario includes assumptions such as a stronger domestic economy, swift resolution of international conflicts and strengthening global economy, more than full employment, reduced political tensions, and other favorable assumptions. This sensitivity analysis and related impact on the ACL is a hypothetical analysis and is not intended to represent management’s judgments at December 31, 2024.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

​

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the sum of the estimated fair values of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed in a business combination. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the balance of goodwill was $1.9 billion. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.

​

Under the ASU Topic 350, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on the difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity is able to perform an optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before proceeding to the quantitative step of determining whether the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds it fair value.

We evaluated the carrying value of goodwill as of October 31, 2024, our annual test date, and determined that no impairment charge was necessary as the fair value of the entity exceeded the carrying value. We will continue to monitor the impact of current economic conditions and other events on the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. If the current economic conditions and other events were to deteriorate and our stock price falls below current levels, we will have to reevaluate the impact on our financial condition and potential impairment of goodwill.

​

​

67

Core deposit intangibles and client list intangibles consist primarily of amortizing assets established during the acquisition of other banks. This includes whole bank acquisitions and the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities from other financial institutions. Core deposit intangibles represent the estimated value of long-term deposit relationships acquired in these transactions. Client list intangibles represent the value of long-term client relationships for the correspondent banking and wealth and trust management business. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives, such as deposit accounts in the case of core deposit intangible, on a method that we believe reasonably approximates the anticipated benefit stream from this intangible. The estimated useful lives are periodically reviewed for reasonableness.

Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets

​

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of the transactions reported in our consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to differences between the tax basis and accounting basis of certain assets and liabilities. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. The Company determines the realization of deferred tax assets by considering all positive and negative evidence available, including the impact of recent operating results, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards and tax planning strategies. Determining whether deferred tax assets are realizable is subjective and requires the use of significant judgment. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more-likely-than-not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Additionally, income tax returns are filed by the Company or its subsidiaries in various state and local jurisdictions based on the Company’s footprint. The tax laws and regulations in each jurisdiction are complex and may be subject to different interpretations by the Company and the relevant taxing authorities. Therefore, the Company is required to exercise judgment in determining tax accruals and evaluating the Company’s tax positions, including evaluating uncertain tax positions. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 11—Income Taxes to the consolidated financial statements for further details and discussion.

Recent Accounting Standards and Pronouncements

For information relating to recent accounting standards and pronouncements, see Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements entitled “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

68

69

Net Interest Income

​

Net interest income is the largest component of our net income. Net interest income is the difference between income earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is determined by the yields earned on interest-earning assets, rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, the relative balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the degree of mismatch, and the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets represents our net interest margin.

The Federal Reserve implemented a total rate cut of 100 basis-point, beginning with a 50 basis-point reduction in mid-September 2024. This was followed by two additional cuts of 25 basis-point each, one in early November 2024 and the other in mid-December 2024. These rate cuts came after a series of rate hikes that began in March 2022, resulting in a target range of 4.25% to 4.50% at December 31, 2024. As the rate reductions occurred during the later part of the year 2024, the Company operated in a comparatively higher rate environment in 2024 compared to 2023.

2024 compared to 2023

Net interest income and net interest margin are highlighted for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 2023:

​

70

​

71

Table 1—Yields on Average Interest-Earning Assets and Rates on Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities