First Internet Bancorp (Form: 10-Q, Received: 08/05/2015 16:59:52)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period June 30, 2015



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From ________ to ________.

Commission File Number 001-35750

First Internet Bancorp

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



Indiana		20-3489991
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1700 Indianapolis, Indiana		46240
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)



	(317) 532-7900
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

	(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).



Large Accelerated Filer ¨	Accelerated Filer þ
Non-accelerated Filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

As of August 3, 2015 , the registrant had 4,484,513 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, or business of First Internet Bancorp (“we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”). Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance or results, are based on information available at the time the statements are made, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the information in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include: failures of or interruptions in the communications and information systems on which we rely to conduct our business; our plans to grow our commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan portfolios; competition with national, regional, and community financial institutions; the loss of any key members of senior management; fluctuations in interest rates; general economic conditions; and risks relating to the regulation of financial institutions. Additional factors that may affect our results include those discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors” and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

( i )

PART I


ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

First Internet Bancorp

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands except share data)



	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	1,713		$	1,940
Interest-bearing demand deposits	28,889			26,349
Total cash and cash equivalents	30,602			28,289
Interest-bearing time deposits	1,250			2,000
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $192,697 and $137,727, respectively)	190,767			137,518
Loans held-for-sale (includes $28,494 and $32,618 at fair value, respectively)	29,872			34,671
Loans receivable	814,243			732,426
Allowance for loan losses	(7,073		)	(5,800		)
Net loans receivable	807,170			726,626
Accrued interest receivable	3,550			2,833
Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis stock	6,946			5,350
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance	12,524			12,325
Premises and equipment, net	8,120			7,061
Goodwill	4,687			4,687
Other real estate owned	4,488			4,488
Accrued income and other assets	4,669			4,655
Total assets	$	1,104,645		$	970,503
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	20,994		$	21,790
Interest-bearing deposits	835,509			736,808
Total deposits	856,503			758,598
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	140,935			106,897
Subordinated debt	2,915			2,873
Accrued interest payable	108			97
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	4,276			5,253
Total liabilities	1,004,737			873,718
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 4,913,779 shares authorized; issued and outstanding - none	—			—
Voting common stock, no par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 4,484,513 and 4,439,575 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	72,218			71,774
Nonvoting common stock, no par value; 86,221 shares authorized; issued and outstanding - none	—			—
Retained earnings	28,928			25,146
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,238		)	(135		)
Total shareholders’ equity	99,908			96,785
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,104,645		$	970,503

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

First Internet Bancorp

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income – Unaudited

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Interest Income
Loans	$	9,043		$	6,571		$	17,433		$	12,700
Securities – taxable	945			987			1,667			1,736
Securities – non-taxable	59			—			59			58
Other earning assets	83			54			158			151
Total interest income	10,130			7,612			19,317			14,645
Interest Expense
Deposits	2,137			1,922			4,090			3,782
Other borrowed funds	421			317			881			624
Total interest expense	2,558			2,239			4,971			4,406
Net Interest Income	7,572			5,373			14,346			10,239
Provision (Credit) for Loan Losses	304			(73		)	746			74
Net Interest Income After Provision (Credit) for Loan Losses	7,268			5,446			13,600			10,165
Noninterest Income
Service charges and fees	193			187			369			354
Mortgage banking activities	2,214			1,229			5,100			2,129
Gain on sale of securities	—			125			—			484
Loss on asset disposals	(33		)	(18		)	(47		)	(31		)
Other	102			99			202			197
Total noninterest income	2,476			1,622			5,624			3,133
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits	3,787			2,948			7,365			5,955
Marketing, advertising, and promotion	334			387			786			767
Consulting and professional services	564			465			1,156			898
Data processing	233			239			481			473
Loan expenses	181			136			362			250
Premises and equipment	691			761			1,333			1,462
Deposit insurance premium	160			138			310			282
Other	377			486			791			911
Total noninterest expense	6,327			5,560			12,584			10,998
Income Before Income Taxes	3,417			1,508			6,640			2,300
Income Tax Provision	1,152			531			2,312			723
Net Income	$	2,265		$	977		$	4,328		$	1,577
Income Per Share of Common Stock
Basic	$	0.50		$	0.22		$	0.96		$	0.35
Diluted	$	0.50		$	0.22		$	0.95		$	0.35
Weighted-Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
Basic	4,529,823			4,496,219			4,523,336			4,495,449
Diluted	4,550,034			4,504,302			4,536,736			4,503,010
Dividends Declared Per Share	$	0.06		$	0.06		$	0.12		$	0.12

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

First Internet Bancorp

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Unaudited

(Amounts in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net income	$	2,265		$	977		$	4,328		$	1,577
Other comprehensive income
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale	(2,539		)	2,625			(1,721		)	3,550
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized	—			(125		)	—			(484		)
Net unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale for which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in income	—			688			—			751
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax	(2,539		)	3,188			(1,721		)	3,817
Income tax provision (benefit)	(909		)	1,134			(618		)	1,358
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(1,630		)	2,054			(1,103		)	2,459
Comprehensive income	$	635		$	3,031		$	3,225		$	4,036

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

First Internet Bancorp

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity - Unaudited

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

(Amounts in thousands except per share data)



	Voting and Nonvoting Common Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2015	$	71,774		$	(135	)	$	25,146		$	96,785
Net income	—			—			4,328			4,328
Other comprehensive loss	—			(1,103		)	—			(1,103		)
Dividends declared ($0.12 per share)	—			—			(546		)	(546		)
Recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation	458			—			—			458
Deferred stock rights issued in lieu of cash dividends payable on outstanding deferred stock rights	10			—			—			10
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation	14			—			—			14
Common stock redeemed for the net settlement of share-based awards	(38		)	—			—			(38		)
Balance, June 30, 2015	$	72,218		$	(1,238	)	$	28,928		$	99,908

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

First Internet Bancorp

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Unaudited

(Amounts in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Operating Activities
Net income	$	4,328		$	1,577
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	922			1,004
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance	(199		)	(193		)
Provision for loan losses	746			74
Share-based compensation expense	458			252
Gain from sale of available-for-sale securities	—			(484		)
Loans originated for sale	(277,913		)	(161,992		)
Proceeds from sale of loans	287,065			171,434
Gain on loans sold	(4,845		)	(1,908		)
Decrease (increase) in fair value of loans held-for-sale	492			(390		)
(Gain) loss on derivatives	(747		)	169
Loss on disposition of assets	47			31
Net change in accrued income and other assets	203			1,446
Net change in accrued expenses and other liabilities	(563		)	658
Net cash provided by operating activities	9,994			11,678
Investing Activities
Net change in loans	(81,290		)	(73,596		)
Net change in interest bearing deposits	750			500
Maturities of securities available-for-sale	10,515			8,946
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale	—			113,587
Purchase of securities available-for-sale	(65,821		)	(96,803		)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis stock	(1,596		)	—
Purchase of premises and equipment	(1,586		)	(557		)
Loans purchased	—			(57,217		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(139,028		)	(105,140		)
Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits	97,905			71,078
Cash dividends paid	(534		)	(529		)
Proceeds from advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	180,000			30,000
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	(146,000		)	(40,000		)
Other, net	(24		)	(133		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	131,347			60,416
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	2,313			(33,046		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period	28,289			53,690
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	30,602		$	20,644
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	4,960		$	4,412
Cash paid during the period for taxes	1,070			—
Cash dividends declared, not paid	267			265

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

First Internet Bancorp

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited

(Table amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2015 or any other period. The June 30, 2015 condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the First Internet Bancorp Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 .

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, or assumptions that could have a material effect on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and the disclosures provided. The determination of the allowance for loan losses, valuations and impairments of investment securities, and the accounting for income tax expense are highly dependent upon management’s estimates, judgments, and assumptions where changes in any of these could have a significant impact on the financial statements.

The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits that arise primarily in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Internet Bancorp (the “Company”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Internet Bank of Indiana (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, JKH Realty Services, LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2014 financial statements to conform to the 2015 financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

Note 2: Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share of common stock are based on the weighted-average number of basic shares and dilutive shares outstanding during the period.

The following is a reconciliation of the weighted-average common shares for the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 :



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Basic earnings per share
Net income available to common shareholders	$	2,265	$	977	$	4,328	$	1,577
Weighted-average common shares	4,529,823		4,496,219		4,523,336		4,495,449
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.50	$	0.22	$	0.96	$	0.35
Diluted earnings per share
Net income applicable to diluted earnings per share	$	2,265	$	977	$	4,328	$	1,577
Weighted-average common shares	4,529,823		4,496,219		4,523,336		4,495,449
Dilutive effect of warrants	7,006		4,835		3,522		5,838
Dilutive effect of equity compensation	13,205		3,248		9,878		1,723
Weighted-average common and incremental shares	4,550,034		4,504,302		4,536,736		4,503,010
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.50	$	0.22	$	0.95	$	0.35
Number of warrants excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the period	—		—		—		—

Note 3: Securities

The following tables summarize securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	27,993	$	127	$	(548	)	$	27,572
Municipal securities	15,219		—		(440		)	14,779
Mortgage-backed securities	107,055		192		(573		)	106,674
Asset-backed securities	19,430		23		(1		)	19,452
Corporate securities	20,000		—		(695		)	19,305
Other securities	3,000		—		(15		)	2,985
Total available-for-sale	$	192,697	$	342	$	(2,272	)	$	190,767



	December 31, 2014
	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	13,680	$	129	$	(257	)	$	13,552
Mortgage-backed securities	117,134		282		(368		)	117,048
Asset-backed securities	4,913		—		(1		)	4,912
Other securities	2,000		6		—			2,006
Total available-for-sale	$	137,727	$	417	$	(626	)	$	137,518

The carrying value of securities at June 30, 2015 is shown below by their contractual maturity date. Actual maturities will differ because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	Available-for-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Within one year	$	—	$	—
One to five years	—		—
Five to ten years	22,848		22,352
After ten years	40,364		39,304
	63,212		61,656
Mortgage-backed securities	107,055		106,674
Asset-backed securities	19,430		19,452
Other securities	3,000		2,985
Total	$	192,697	$	190,767

Gross realized gains of $0 and $0.9 million, and gross losses of $0 and $0.8 million, resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Gross realized gains of $0 and $2.3 million , and gross losses of $0 and $1.8 million , resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. The total fair value of these investments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $139.9 million and $ 86.9 million, which is approximately 73% and 63% , respectively, of the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio. These declines resulted primarily from fluctuations in market interest rates after purchase.

Except as discussed below, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.

Should the impairment of any of these securities become other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period in which the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) is identified.

The following tables show the securities portfolio's gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	10,425	$	(307	)	$	8,364	$	(241	)	$	18,789	$	(548	)
Municipal securities	14,779		(440		)	—		—			14,779		(440		)
Mortgage-backed securities	59,028		(218		)	19,945		(355		)	78,973		(573		)
Asset-backed securities	5,080		(1		)	—		—			5,080		(1		)
Corporate securities	19,305		(695		)	—		—			19,305		(695		)
Other securities	2,985		(15		)	—		—			2,985		(15		)
Total	$	111,602	$	(1,676	)	$	28,309	$	(596	)	$	139,911	$	(2,272	)



	December 31, 2014
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	801	$	(10	)	$	8,719	$	(247	)	$	9,520	$	(257	)
Mortgage-backed securities	51,204		(57		)	21,237		(311		)	72,441		(368		)
Asset-backed securities	4,912		(1		)	—		—			4,912		(1		)
Total	$	56,917	$	(68	)	$	29,956	$	(558	)	$	86,873	$	(626	)

U. S. Government-Sponsored Agencies, Municipal Securities and Corporate Securities

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in securities issued by U.S. Government-sponsored agencies, municipal organizations and corporate entities were caused by interest rate changes. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015 .

Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities were caused by interest rate changes. The Company expects to recover the amortized cost bases over the term of the securities. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015 .

Other Securities

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in other securities were caused by interest rate changes. The balance consists of one investment in the Community Reinvestment Act Qualified Fund. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investment and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015 .

Credit Losses Recognized on Investments

Certain debt securities have experienced fair value deterioration due to credit losses and other market factors, but are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

The following tables provide information about debt securities for which only a credit loss was recognized in income and other losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The Company did not own any OTTI securities during the three or six months ended June 30, 2015 .



	Accumulated Credit Losses
Credit losses on debt securities held
April 1, 2014	$	1,150
Realized losses related to OTTI	(1,106		)
Recoveries related to OTTI	(44		)
June 30, 2014	$	—



	Accumulated Credit Losses
Credit losses on debt securities held
January 1, 2014	$	1,183
Realized losses related to OTTI	(1,139		)
Recoveries related to OTTI	(44		)
June 30, 2014	$	—

There were no amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 . Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and the affected line items in the condensed consolidated statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , were as follows:



Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014		Affected Line Item in the Statements of Income
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale
Gain realized in earnings	$	125	Gain on sale of securities
Total reclassified amount before tax	125		Income Before Income Taxes
Tax expense	39		Income Tax Provision
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	86	Net Income



Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014		Affected Line Item in the Statements of Income
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale
Gain realized in earnings	$	484	Gain on sale of securities
Total reclassified amount before tax	484		Income Before Income Taxes
Tax expense	165		Income Tax Provision
Total reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	319	Net Income

Note 4: Loans Receivable

Loans that management intends to hold until maturity are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for unearned income, charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any unamortized deferred fees or costs on originated loans, and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.

For loans recorded at cost, interest income is accrued based on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, as well as premiums and discounts, are deferred and amortized as a level yield adjustment over the respective term of the loan.

Categories of loans include:



	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial	$	89,316		$	77,232
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	39,405			34,295
Investor commercial real estate	20,163			22,069
Construction	20,155			24,883
Single tenant lease financing	279,891			192,608
Total commercial loans	448,930			351,087
Consumer loans
Residential mortgage	207,703			220,612
Home equity	49,662			58,434
Other consumer	103,157			97,094
Total consumer loans	360,522			376,140
Total commercial and consumer loans	809,452			727,227
Deferred loan origination costs and premiums and discounts on purchased loans	4,791			5,199
Total loans receivable	814,243			732,426
Allowance for loan losses	(7,073		)	(5,800		)
Net loans receivable	$	807,170		$	726,626

The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:

Commercial and Industrial: Commercial and industrial loans’ source of repayment are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Loans are made for working capital, equipment purchases, or other purposes. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed and may incorporate a personal guarantee.

Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate: The primary source of repayment is the cash flow from the ongoing operations and activities conducted by the borrower, or an affiliate of the borrower, who owns the property. This portfolio is diverse in terms of geographic location and often times are secured by manufacturing and service facilities, as well as office buildings.

Investor Commercial Real Estate: These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. These loans may also incorporate a personal guarantee. This portfolio typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Investor commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s investor commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of property type and geographic location. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on property financial performance, collateral value, and other risk grade criteria. As a general rule, the Company avoids financing special use projects or properties outside of its designated market areas (Central Indiana and Phoenix, Arizona, as well as markets adjacent to these areas) unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk.

Construction: Construction loans are secured by real estate and are made to finance land development in preparation to erecting new structures or the on-site construction of industrial, commercial or residential. These loans are typically made for vacant land, as well as the acquisition and improvement of developed and undeveloped property. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value.

Single Tenant Lease Financing: These loans are secured by real estate and are made to finance long term lease arrangements related to single tenant properties that are generally occupied by regionally, nationally or globally branded businesses. The loans are underwritten based on the financial strength of the borrower, characteristics of the real estate, cash flows generated from the lease arrangements and the financial strength of the tenant. Similar to the other loan portfolios, management monitors and evaluates these loans based on borrower and tenant financial performance, collateral value, industry trends and other risk grade criteria.

Residential Mortgage: With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, the Company typically establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the financial circumstances of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in residential property values. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers in geographically diverse locations throughout the country.

Home Equity: Home equity loans and lines of credit are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences. The properties securing the Company's home equity portfolio are generally geographically diverse as the Company offers these products on a nationwide basis. Repayment of home equity loans and lines of credit may be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties and unemployment levels, among other economic conditions and financial circumstances in the market.

Other Consumer: These loans primarily consist of consumer loans and credit cards. Consumer loans may be secured by consumer assets such as horse trailers or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured, such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of consumer loans is primarily dependent upon the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers in geographically diverse locations throughout the country.

Allowance for Loan Losses Methodology

Company policy is designed to ensure that an adequate allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) is maintained. The portfolio is segmented by loan type, and the required ALLL for types of performing homogeneous loans which do not have a specific reserve is determined by applying a factor based on average historical losses, adjusted for current economic factors and portfolio trends. Management believes the historical loss experience methodology is appropriate in the current economic environment as it captures loss rates that are comparable to the current period being analyzed. Management adds qualitative factors for observable trends, changes in internal practices, changes in delinquencies and impairments, and external factors. Observable factors include changes in the composition and size of portfolios, as well as loan terms or concentration levels. The Company evaluates the impact of internal changes such as management and staff experience levels or modification to loan underwriting processes. Delinquency trends are scrutinized for both volume and severity of past due, nonaccrual, or classified loans as well as any changes in the value of underlying collateral. Finally, the Company considers the effect of other external factors such as national, regional, and local economic and business conditions, as well as competitive, legal, and regulatory requirements. Loans that are considered to be impaired are evaluated to determine the need for a specific allowance by applying at least one of three methodologies: present value of future cash flows; fair value of collateral less cost to sell; or the loan’s observable market price. All troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) are considered impaired loans. Loans evaluated for impairment are removed from other pools to prevent double-counting.

Provision for Loan Losses

A provision for estimated losses on loans is charged to earnings based upon management’s evaluation of the potential losses. Such an evaluation, which includes a review of all loans for which full collectability may not be reasonably assured considers, among other factors, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, loan loss experience, and other factors that are particularly susceptible to changes that could result in a material adjustment in the near term. While management attempts to use the best information available in making its

evaluations, future allowance adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions change substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310, Receivables , requires that impaired loans be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates or the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell and allows existing methods for recognizing interest income.

Policy for Charging Off Loans

The Company’s policy is to charge off a loan at any point in time when it no longer can be considered a bankable asset, meaning collectible within the parameters of policy. A secured loan is generally charged down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, no later than when it is 120 days past due as to principal or interest. An unsecured loan generally is charged off no later than when it is 180 days past due as to principal or interest.

The following tables present changes in the balance of the ALLL during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 .



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Commercial and industrial		Owner-occupied commercial real estate		Investor commercial real estate			Construction			Single tenant lease financing		Residential mortgage			Home equity			Other consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,010	$	391	$	218		$	359		$	2,452	$	988		$	203		$	757		$	6,378
Provision (credit) charged to expense	191		48		(457		)	(132		)	641		42			(46		)	17			304
Losses charged off	—		—		—			—			—		(100		)	—			(132		)	(232		)
Recoveries	—		—		500			—			—		3			—			120			623
Balance, end of period	$	1,201	$	439	$	261		$	227		$	3,093	$	933		$	157		$	762		$	7,073



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Commercial and industrial		Owner-occupied commercial real estate		Investor commercial real estate			Construction			Single tenant lease financing		Residential mortgage			Home equity			Other consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	920	$	345	$	261		$	330		$	2,061	$	985		$	207		$	691		$	5,800
Provision (credit) charged to expense	281		94		(500		)	(103		)	1,032		(152		)	(50		)	144			746
Losses charged off	—		—		—			—			—		(171		)	—			(289		)	(460		)
Recoveries	—		—		500			—			—		271			—			216			987
Balance, end of period	$	1,201	$	439	$	261		$	227		$	3,093	$	933		$	157		$	762		$	7,073



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Commercial and industrial			Owner-occupied commercial real estate			Investor commercial real estate			Construction			Single tenant lease financing			Residential mortgage			Home equity		Other consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	871		$	305		$	231		$	292		$	1,868		$	859		$	185	$	777		$	5,388
Provision (credit) charged to expense	(136		)	(34		)	(27		)	(33		)	(208		)	211			28		126			(73		)
Losses charged off	—			—			—			—			—			(89		)	—		(166		)	(255		)
Recoveries	—			—			1			—			—			9			—		70			80
Balance, end of period	$	735		$	271		$	205		$	259		$	1,660		$	990		$	213	$	807		$	5,140



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Commercial and industrial			Owner-occupied commercial real estate			Investor commercial real estate			Construction			Single tenant lease financing			Residential mortgage			Home equity		Other consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	819		$	290		$	219		$	277		$	1,731		$	1,008		$	211	$	871		$	5,426
Provision (credit) charged to expense	(84		)	(19		)	(15		)	(18		)	(71		)	171			2		108			74
Losses charged off	—			—			—			—			—			(211		)	—		(335		)	(546		)
Recoveries	—			—			1			—			—			22			—		163			186
Balance, end of period	$	735		$	271		$	205		$	259		$	1,660		$	990		$	213	$	807		$	5,140

The following tables present the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of June 30, 2015 , and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015
	Commercial and industrial		Owner-occupied commercial real estate		Investor commercial real estate		Construction		Single tenant lease financing		Residential mortgage		Home equity		Other consumer		Total
Loans:
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	89,316	$	39,405	$	20,163	$	20,155	$	279,891	$	206,534	$	49,662	$	102,987	$	808,113
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	—		—		—		—		—		1,169		—		170		1,339
Ending balance	$	89,316	$	39,405	$	20,163	$	20,155	$	279,891	$	207,703	$	49,662	$	103,157	$	809,452
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,201	$	439	$	261	$	227	$	3,093	$	919	$	157	$	762	$	7,059
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	—		—		—		—		—		14		—		—		14
Ending balance	$	1,201	$	439	$	261	$	227	$	3,093	$	933	$	157	$	762	$	7,073



	December 31, 2014
	Commercial and industrial		Owner-occupied commercial real estate		Investor commercial real estate		Construction		Single tenant lease financing		Residential mortgage		Home equity		Other consumer		Total
Loans:
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	77,232	$	34,295	$	21,982	$	24,883	$	192,608	$	219,473	$	58,434	$	96,789	$	725,696
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	—		—		87		—		—		1,139		—		305		1,531
Ending balance	$	77,232	$	34,295	$	22,069	$	24,883	$	192,608	$	220,612	$	58,434	$	97,094	$	727,227
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	920	$	345	$	261	$	330	$	2,061	$	985	$	207	$	676	$	5,785
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		15		15
Ending balance	$	920	$	345	$	261	$	330	$	2,061	$	985	$	207	$	691	$	5,800

The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its commercial loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 9. A description of the general characteristics of the nine risk grades is as follows:


•	“Pass” (Grades 1-5) - Higher quality loans that do not fit any of the other categories described below.


•	“Special Mention” (Grade 6) - Loans that possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness which deserve close attention.


•	“Substandard” (Grade 7) - Loans that possess a defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Loans characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.

•

“Doubtful” (Grade 8) - Such loans have been placed on nonaccrual status and may be heavily dependent upon collateral possessing a value that is difficult to determine or based upon some near-term event which lacks clear certainty. These loans have all of the weaknesses of those classified as Substandard; however, based on existing conditions, these weaknesses make full collection of the principal balance highly improbable.


•	“Loss” (Grade 9) - Loans that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuing to carry them as assets is not warranted.

Nonaccrual Loans

Any loan which becomes 90 days delinquent or has the full collection of principal and interest in doubt will be considered for nonaccrual status. At the time a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all accrued but unpaid interest will be reversed from interest income. Placing the loan on nonaccrual does not relieve the borrower of the obligation to repay interest. A loan placed on nonaccrual may be restored to accrual status when all delinquent principal and interest has been brought current and the Company expects full payment of the remaining contractual principal and interest.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Company’s commercial loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015
	Commercial and industrial		Owner-occupied commercial real estate		Investor commercial real estate		Construction		Single tenant lease financing		Total
Rating:
1-5 Pass	$	85,338	$	39,389	$	18,612	$	19,793	$	279,891	$	443,023
6 Special Mention	2,070		—		—		362		—		2,432
7 Substandard	1,908		16		1,551		—		—		3,475
8 Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	89,316	$	39,405	$	20,163	$	20,155	$	279,891	$	448,930



	June 30, 2015
	Residential mortgage		Home equity		Other consumer		Total
Performing	$	207,584	$	49,662	$	103,088	$	360,334
Nonaccrual	119		—		69		188
Total	$	207,703	$	49,662	$	103,157	$	360,522



	December 31, 2014
	Commercial and industrial		Owner-occupied commercial real estate		Investor commercial real estate		Construction		Single tenant lease financing		Total
Rating:
1-5 Pass	$	77,232	$	34,278	$	20,478	$	24,504	$	192,608	$	349,100
6 Special Mention	—		—		—		379		—		379
7 Substandard	—		17		1,591		—		—		1,608
8 Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	77,232	$	34,295	$	22,069	$	24,883	$	192,608	$	351,087



	December 31, 2014
	Residential mortgage		Home equity		Other consumer		Total
Performing	$	220,587	$	58,434	$	96,971	$	375,992
Nonaccrual	25		—		123		148
Total	$	220,612	$	58,434	$	97,094	$	376,140

The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio delinquency analysis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Non- accrual Loans		Total Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	89,316	$	89,316	$	—	$	—
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		39,405		39,405		—		—
Investor commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		20,163		20,163		—		—
Construction	—		—		—		—		20,155		20,155		—		—
Single tenant lease financing	—		—		—		—		279,891		279,891		—		—
Residential mortgage	24		—		60		84		207,619		207,703		119		—
Home equity	—		—		—		—		49,662		49,662		—		—
Other consumer	72		12		—		84		103,073		103,157		69		—
Total	$	96	$	12	$	60	$	168	$	809,284	$	809,452	$	188	$	—



	December 31, 2014
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Non- accrual Loans		Total Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	77,232	$	77,232	$	—	$	—
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		34,295		34,295		—		—
Investor commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		22,069		22,069		87		—
Construction	—		—		—		—		24,883		24,883		—		—
Single tenant lease financing	—		—		—		—		192,608		192,608		—		—
Residential mortgage	161		—		57		218		220,394		220,612		25		57
Home equity	—		—		—		—		58,434		58,434		—		—
Other consumer	249		56		53		358		96,736		97,094		123		4
Total	$	410	$	56	$	110	$	576	$	726,651	$	727,227	$	235	$	61

Impaired Loans

A loan is designated as impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16) when, based on current information or events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Payments with delays generally not exceeding 90 days outstanding are not considered impaired. Certain nonaccrual and substantially all delinquent loans more than 90 days past due may be considered to be impaired. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 90 days past due and accrued interest is reversed against earnings, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. The accrual of interest on impaired and nonaccrual loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due.

Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in TDRs where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.

The following table presents the Company’s impaired loans as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015						December 31, 2014
	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Recorded Balance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance
Investor commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	87	$	87	$	—
Residential mortgage	1,109		1,116		—		1,139		1,146		—
Other consumer	170		267		—		268		338		—
Total	1,279		1,383		—		1,494		1,571		—
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
Residential mortgage	60		60		14		—		—		—
Other consumer	—		—		—		37		51		15
Total	60		60		14		37		51		15
Total impaired loans	$	1,339	$	1,443	$	14	$	1,531	$	1,622	$	15

The table below presents average balances and interest income recognized for impaired loans during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015								June 30, 2014
	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	Average Balance		Interest Income		Average Balance		Interest Income		Average Balance		Interest Income		Average Balance		Interest Income
Loans without a specific valuation allowance
Investor commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	43	$	2	$	1,049	$	3	$	1,050	$	3
Residential mortgage	1,110		2		1,085		4		1,107		5		1,290		11
Other consumer	215		3		168		6		234		12		265		17
Total	1,325		5		1,296		12		2,390		20		2,605		31
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
Residential mortgage	60		—		30		—		13		—		18		—
Other consumer	—		—		27		1		54		1		66		1
Total	60		—		57		1		67		1		84		1
Total impaired loans	$	1,385	$	5	$	1,353	$	13	$	2,457	$	21	$	2,689	$	32

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”)

The loan portfolio includes TDRs which are loans that have been modified to grant economic concessions to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from loss mitigation efforts and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructuring and typically are returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally not less than six consecutive months.

When loans are modified in a TDR, any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans is evaluated based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or using the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If it is determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded balance of the loan, impairment is recognized through a specific allowance or charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, all TDRs, including those that have payment defaults, are evaluated for possible impairment, and impairment is recognized through the allowance.

In the course of working with troubled borrowers, the Company may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans in an effort to work out an alternative payment schedule with the borrower in order to optimize the collectability of the loan. Any loan modified is reviewed by the Company to identify whether a TDR has occurred when the Company grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider based on economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status or the loan may be restructured to secure additional collateral and/or guarantees to support the debt, or a combination of the two.

Loans classified as new TDRs during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are shown in the table below. The 2015 and 2014 modifications consisted solely of maturity date concessions. There were no loans classified as new TDRs during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.



	New TDRs During the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015					June 30, 2014
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Balance Before		Recorded Balance After		Number of Contracts	Recorded Balance Before		Recorded Balance After
Residential mortgage	1	$	57	$	57	—	$	—	$	—
Other consumer	—	—		—		1	21		21
Total loans	1	$	57	$	57	1	$	21	$	21

There were no TDR loans which had payment defaults during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 . Default occurs when a loan is 90 days or more past due or transferred to nonaccrual within twelve months of restructuring.

Note 5: Premises and Equipment

The following table summarizes premises and equipment at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Land	$	2,500		$	2,500
Building and improvements	4,092			3,018
Furniture and equipment	5,745			5,277
Less: accumulated depreciation	(4,217		)	(3,734		)
	$	8,120		$	7,061

Note 6: Goodwill

The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods ended June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



Balance as of January 1, 2014	$	4,687
Changes in goodwill during the year	—
Balance as of December 31, 2014	4,687
Changes in goodwill during the period	—
Balance as of June 30, 2015	$	4,687

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of August 31, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. No events or changes in circumstances have occurred since the August 31, 2014 annual impairment test that would suggest it was more likely than not goodwill impairment existed.

Note 7: Benefit Plans

Employment Agreement

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer that provides for the continuation of salary and certain benefits for a specified period of time under certain conditions. Under the terms of the agreement, these payments could occur in the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined, along with other specific conditions.

2013 Equity Incentive Plan

The 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) authorizes the issuance of 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock in the form of equity-based awards to employees, directors, and other eligible persons. Under the terms of the 2013 Plan, the pool of shares available for issuance may be used for available types of equity awards under the 2013 Plan, which includes stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, stock unit awards, and other stock-based awards. All employees, consultants, and advisors of the Company or any subsidiary, as well as all non-employee directors of the Company, are eligible to receive awards under the 2013 Plan.

The Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.5 million of share-based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 , respectively, related to awards made under th e 2013 Plan. The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million of share-based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 , respectively, related to awards made under th e 2013 Plan.

The following table summarizes the status of the 2013 Plan awards as of June 30, 2015 , and activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 .



	Restricted Stock Units	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share		Restricted Stock Awards		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share		Deferred Stock Units		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested at January 1, 2015	—	$	—	20,777		$	25.09	—		$	—
Granted	30,858	18.86		46,988		16.69		7		16.85
Vested	—	—		(32,582	)	20.66		(7	)	16.85
Forfeited	—	—		—		—		—		—
Nonvested at June 30, 2015	30,858	$	18.86	35,183		$	17.97	—		$	—

At June 30, 2015 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards was $ 1.0 million with a weighted-average expense recognition period of 2.1 years .

Directors Deferred Stock Plan

Until January 1, 2014, the Company had a stock compensation plan for members of the Board of Directors (“Directors Deferred Stock Plan”). The Company reserved 180,000 shares of common stock that could have been issued pursuant to the Directors Deferred Stock Plan. The plan provided directors the option to elect to receive up to 100% of their annual retainer in either common stock or deferred stock rights. Deferred stock rights were to be settled in common stock following the end of the deferral period payable on the basis of one share of common stock for each deferred stock right.

The following table summarizes the status of deferred stock rights related to the Directors Deferred Stock Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2015 .



		Deferred Stock Rights
Outstanding, beginning of period		80,528
Granted		582
Exercised		—
Outstanding, end of period		81,110

All deferred stock rights granted during the 2015 period were additional rights issued in lieu of cash dividends payable on outstanding deferred stock rights.

Note 8: Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement , defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASU Topic 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:


Level 1	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities


Level 2	Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities


Level 3	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Securities

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid mutual funds. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows.

Level 2 securities include U.S. Government-sponsored agencies, municipal securities, mortgage and asset-backed securities and certain corporate securities. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific investment securities but also on the investment securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities.

In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows. Discounted cash flows are calculated based off of the anticipated future cash flows updated to incorporate loss severities. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as default and deferral activity are reviewed and incorporated into the calculation.

Loans Held-for-Sale

The fair value of loans held-for-sale is determined using quoted prices for similar assets, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan (Level 2).

Forward Contracts

The fair values of forward contracts on to-be-announced securities are determined using quoted prices in active markets, or benchmarked thereto (Level 1).

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

The fair values of interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) are determined using the projected sale price of individual loans based on changes in market interest rates, projected pull-through rates (the probability that an IRLC will ultimately result in an originated loan), the reduction in the value of the applicant’s option due to the passage of time, and the remaining origination costs to be incurred based on management’s estimate of market costs (Level 3).

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



			June 30, 2015 Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	27,572	$	—	$	27,572	$	—
Municipal securities	14,779		—		14,779		—
Mortgage-backed securities	106,674		—		106,674		—
Asset-backed securities	19,452		—		19,452		—
Corporate securities	19,305		—		19,305		—
Other securities	2,985		2,985		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	190,767		2,985		187,782		—
Loans held-for-sale (mandatory pricing agreements)	28,494		—		28,494		—
Forward contracts	240		240		—		—
Interest rate lock commitments	623		—		—		623



				December 31, 2014 Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	13,552		$	—		$	13,552	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities	117,048			—			117,048		—
Asset-backed securities	4,912			—			4,912		—
Other securities	2,006			2,006			—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	137,518			2,006			135,512		—
Loans held-for-sale (mandatory pricing agreements)	32,618			—			32,618		—
Forward contracts	(405		)	(405		)	—		—
Interest rate lock commitments	521			—			—		521

The following tables reconcile the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 .



	Three Months Ended
	Securities Available-for- Sale			Interest Rate Lock Commitments
Balance, April 1, 2015	$	—		$	913
Total realized losses
Included in net income	—			(290		)
Balance, June 30, 2015	$	—		$	623

Balance, April 1, 2014	$	1,811		$	170
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)
Included in net income	(259		)	277
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	(1,552		)	—
Balance, June 30, 2014	$	—		$	447



	Six Months Ended
	Securities Available-for- Sale			Interest Rate Lock Commitments
Balance, January 1, 2015	$	—		$	521
Total realized gains
Included in net income	—			102
Balance, June 30, 2015	$	—		$	623

Balance as of January 1, 2014	$	1,673		$	79
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)
Included in net income	(259		)	368
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	(1,414		)	—
Balance, June 30, 2014	$	—		$	447

The following describes valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent)

Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for determining the amount of impairment include estimating fair value using the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, for collateral dependent loans.

If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value.

Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method.

The following tables present the fair value measurements of impaired loans recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



			June 30, 2015 Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	46	$	—	$	—	$	46

December 31, 2014
Fair Value Measurements Using

Fair

Value

Quoted Prices

in Active

Markets for

Identical

Assets

(Level 1)

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

Impaired loans

—

Significant Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following tables present quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements other than goodwill.



	Fair Value at June 30, 2015		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	46	Fair value of collateral	Discount for type of property and current market conditions	23%
IRLCs	623		Discounted cash flow	Loan closing rates	42% - 98%



	Fair Value at December 31, 2014		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range
IRLCs	$	521	Discounted cash flow	Loan closing rates	40% - 95%

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For these instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Interest-Bearing Time Deposits

The fair value of these financial instruments approximates carrying value.

Loans Held-for-Sale

The fair value of these loans approximates carrying value.

Loans Receivable

The fair value of loans receivable is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and remaining maturities.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The fair value of these financial instruments approximates carrying value.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Stock

The fair value approximates carrying value.

Deposits

The fair value of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits, savings and money market accounts approximates carrying value. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit and brokered deposits are estimated using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

The fair value of fixed rate advances is estimated using rates currently available for advances with similar remaining maturities. The carrying value of variable rate advances approximates fair value.

Subordinated Debt

The fair value of our subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on current borrowing rates for similar types of debt instruments.

Accrued Interest Payable

The fair value of these financial instruments approximates carrying value.

Commitments

The fair value of commitments to extend credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with similar maturities and interest rates. The Company determined that the fair value of commitments was zero based on the contractual value of outstanding commitments at each of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .

The following tables summarize the carrying value and estimated fair value of all financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .



			June 30, 2015 Fair Value Measurements Using
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices In Active Market for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	30,602	$	30,602	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing time deposits	1,250		1,250		—		—
Loans held-for-sale (best efforts pricing agreements)	1,378		—		1,378		—
Loans receivable	814,243		—		—		816,554
Accrued interest receivable	3,550		3,550		—		—
Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis stock	6,946		—		6,946		—
Deposits	856,503		402,012		—		456,250
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	140,935		—		137,149		—
Subordinated debt	2,915		—		3,044		—
Accrued interest payable	108		108		—		—



			December 31, 2014 Fair Value Measurements Using
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices In Active Market for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	28,289	$	28,289	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing time deposits	2,000		2,000		—		—
Loans held-for-sale (best efforts pricing agreements)	2,053		—		2,053		—
Loans receivable	732,426		—		—		733,538
Accrued interest receivable	2,833		2,833		—		—
Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis stock	5,350		—		5,350		—
Deposits	758,598		383,847		—		377,067
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	106,897		—		107,743		—
Subordinated debt	2,873		—		3,094		—
Accrued interest payable	97		97		—		—

Note 9: Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to help manage exposure to interest rate risk and the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income and the fair value of assets and liabilities. The Company enters into forward contracts for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors and enters into IRLCs with potential borrowers to fund specific mortgage loans that will be sold into the secondary market. The forward contracts are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from the Company’s commitment to fund the loans.

Each of these items are considered derivatives, but are not designated as accounting hedges, and are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in noninterest income on the condensed consolidated statements of income. The fair value of derivative instruments with a positive fair value are reported in accrued income and other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets while derivative instruments with a negative fair value are reported in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , the notional amount and fair value of IRLCs and forward contracts utilized by the Company were as follows.



	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Notional Amount		Fair Value		Notional Amount		Fair Value
Asset Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
IRLCs	$	36,943	$	623	$	29,967	$	521
Forward contracts	60,750		240		—		—

Liability Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Forward contracts	—		—		55,012		(405		)

Fair values of derivative financial instruments were estimated using changes in mortgage interest rates from the date the Company entered into the IRLC and the balance sheet date. Periodic changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows.



	Amount of gain / (loss) recognized in the three months ended						Amount of gain / (loss) recognized in the six months ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014
Asset Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
IRLCs	$	(290	)	$	277		$	102	$	368
Forward contracts	642			—			645		—

Liability Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Forward contracts	—			(342		)	—		(537		)

Note 10: Subordinated Debenture

On June 28, 2013 , the Company entered into a subordinated debenture purchase agreement with a third party and issued a subordinated debenture in the principal amount of $ 3.0 million, which bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 8.00% , and is scheduled to mature on June 28, 2021 ; however, the Company can repay the debenture without premium or penalty at any time after June 28, 2016 . The debenture qualifies for treatment as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The purchase agreement and the debenture contain customary subordination provisions and events of default; however, the right of the investor to accelerate the payment of the debenture is limited to bankruptcy or insolvency.

As partial inducement for the third party to purchase the debenture, the Company issued to the third party a warrant to purchase up to 48,750 shares of common stock at an initial per share exercise price equal to $19.33 . The warrant became exercisable on June 28, 2014 and, unless previously exercised, will expire on June 28, 2021 . The Company has the right to force an exercise of the warrant after the debenture has been repaid in full if the 20 -day volume-weighted average price of a share of its common stock exceeds $30.00 .

The Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to assign a fair value of $0.3 million to the warrant as of June 28, 2013. The following assumptions were used to value the warrant: a risk-free interest rate of 0.66% per the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of issuance, an expected dividend yield of 1.19% calculated using the dividend rate and stock price at the date of the issuance, and an expected volatility of 34% based on the estimated volatility of the Company’s stock over the expected term of the warrant, which is estimated to be three years .

Note 11: Accounting Developments

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (April 2015)

This Update is part of an initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards (the “Simplification Initiative”) implemented by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The objective of the Simplification Initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, beginning after December 15, 2015. Adoption of the ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated and condensed financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis includes certain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. You should review the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by such forward-looking statements. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this report.

Overview

First Internet Bancorp (“we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company”) is a bank holding company that conducts its business activities through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Internet Bank of Indiana, an Indiana chartered bank (the “Bank”). The Bank was the first state-chartered, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured Internet bank and commenced banking operations in 1999. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana on September 15, 2005. On March 21, 2006, we consummated a plan of exchange by which we acquired all of the outstanding shares of the Bank.

We offer a full complement of products and services on a nationwide basis. We conduct our deposit operations primarily over the Internet and have no traditional branch offices. In recent years, we have added commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending, including nationwide single tenant lease financing, and commercial and industrial (“C&I”) lending, including business banking/treasury management services to meet the needs of high-quality commercial borrowers and depositors.

Our business model is significantly different from that of a typical community bank. We do not have a conventional brick and mortar branch system; rather, we operate through our scalable Internet banking platform. The market area for our residential real estate lending, consumer lending, and deposit gathering activities is the entire United States. We also offer single tenant lease financing on a nationwide basis. Our other commercial banking activities, including CRE loans and C&I loans, corporate credit cards, and corporate treasury management services, are offered by our commercial banking team to businesses primarily within Central Indiana, Phoenix, Arizona, and markets adjacent to these areas.

Results of Operations

The following table provides a summary of the Company's financial performance for the five most recent quarters and six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 .



(dollars in thousands except for share and per share data)	Three Months Ended															Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Income Statement Summary:
Net interest income	$	7,572		$	6,774		$	6,375		$	5,673		$	5,373		$	14,346		$	10,239
Provision (credit) for loan losses	304			442			387			(112		)	(73		)	746			74
Noninterest income	2,476			3,148			2,098			1,943			1,622			5,624			3,133
Noninterest expense	6,327			6,257			5,879			5,785			5,560			12,584			10,998
Income tax provision	1,152			1,160			742			661			531			2,312			723
Net income	$	2,265		$	2,063		$	1,465		$	1,282		$	977		$	4,328		$	1,577
Per share and share information
Earnings per share - basic	$	0.50		$	0.46		$	0.33		$	0.29		$	0.22		$	0.96		$	0.35
Earnings per share - diluted	0.50			0.46			0.32			0.28			0.22			0.95			0.35
Dividends declared per share	0.06			0.06			0.06			0.06			0.06			0.12			0.12
Book value per common share	22.28			22.16			21.80			21.35			21.25			22.28			21.25
Tangible book value per common share ¹	21.23			21.11			20.74			20.29			20.19			21.23			20.19
Common shares outstanding	4,484,513			4,484,513			4,439,575			4,439,575			4,449,619			4,484,513			4,449,619
Average common shares outstanding:
Basic	4,529,823			4,516,776			4,499,316			4,497,762			4,496,219			4,523,336			4,495,449
Diluted	4,550,034			4,523,246			4,514,505			4,511,291			4,504,302			4,536,736			4,503,010
Performance ratios
Return on average assets	0.84		%	0.84		%	0.62		%	0.59		%	0.45		%	0.84		%	0.38		%
Return on average shareholders' equity	9.15		%	8.55		%	6.07		%	5.36		%	4.23		%	8.85		%	3.45		%
Return on average tangible common equity ¹	9.60		%	8.98		%	6.38		%	5.64		%	4.46		%	9.29		%	3.63		%
Net interest margin	2.87		%	2.84		%	2.78		%	2.68		%	2.61		%	2.86		%	2.56		%
Capital ratios
Tangible common equity to tangible assets ¹	8.66		%	9.18		%	9.54		%	9.77		%	10.41		%	8.66		%	10.41		%
Leverage ratio	8.93		%	9.52		%	9.87		%	10.52		%	10.45		%	8.93		%	10.45		%
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio	11.12		%	11.99		%	12.55		%	13.22		%	14.03		%	11.12		%	14.03		%
Tier 1 capital ratio	11.12		%	11.99		%	12.55		%	13.22		%	14.03		%	11.12		%	14.03		%
Total risk-based capital ratio	12.28		%	13.18		%	13.75		%	14.45		%	15.30		%	12.28		%	15.30		%

¹ This information represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.

During the second quarter 2015 , net income was $2.3 million , or $0.50 per diluted share, compared to second quarter 2014 net income of $1.0 million , or $0.22 per diluted share, resulting in an increase in net income of $1.3 million , or 131.8% . During the six months ended June 30, 2015 , net income was $4.3 million , or $0.95 per diluted share, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 , in which net income was $1.6 million , or $0.35 per diluted share. These increases were driven by an increase in net income of $2.8 million , or 174.4% , which was due to increases in net interest income and noninterest income, partially offset by increases in the provision for loan losses and noninterest expense. During the second quarter 2015 , return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity were 0.84% and 9.15% , respectively, compared to 0.45% and 4.23% , respectively, for the second quarter 2014 . During the six months ended June 30, 2015 , return on average assets and return on

average shareholders' equity were 0.84% and 8.85% , respectively, compared to 0.38% and 3.45% , respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 .

Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analyses

For the periods presented, the following tables provide the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the related yields and cost of funds. The tables do not reflect any effect of income taxes. Balances are based on the average of daily balances. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analyses



(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2015					March 31, 2015					June 30, 2014
	Average Balance			Yield/Cost		Average Balance			Yield/Cost		Average Balance			Yield/Cost
Assets
Interest-earning assets
Loans, including loans held-for-sale	$	825,620		4.39	%	$	780,302		4.36	%	$	580,539		4.54	%
Securities - taxable	174,057			2.18	%	145,241			2.02	%	194,689			2.03	%
Securities - non-taxable	7,807			3.03	%	—			0.00	%	—			0.00	%
Other earning assets	49,001			0.68	%	41,643			0.73	%	49,524			0.44	%
Total interest-earning assets	1,056,485			3.85	%	967,186			3.85	%	824,752			3.70	%

Allowance for loan losses	(6,545		)			(5,883		)			(5,450		)
Noninterest earning-assets	35,178					34,548					42,808
Total assets	$	1,085,118				$	995,851				$	862,110

Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Regular savings accounts	$	23,873		0.57	%	$	22,099		0.59	%	$	19,023		0.61	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits	76,095			0.55	%	75,405			0.55	%	72,519			0.55	%
Money market accounts	282,015			0.72	%	274,312			0.73	%	267,232			0.73	%
Certificates and brokered deposits	440,752			1.36	%	390,101			1.38	%	349,894			1.50	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	822,735			1.04	%	761,917			1.04	%	708,668			1.09	%
Other borrowed funds	137,421			1.23	%	109,787			1.70	%	34,538			3.68	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	960,156			1.07	%	871,704			1.12	%	743,206			1.21	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits	20,697					22,265					18,821
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities	4,932					4,038					7,442
Total liabilities	985,785					898,007					769,469

Shareholders' equity	99,333					97,844					92,641
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,085,118				$	995,851				$	862,110

Interest rate spread ¹				2.78	%				2.73	%				2.49	%
Net interest margin ²				2.87	%				2.84	%				2.61	%

¹ Yield on total interest-earning assets minus cost of total interest-bearing liabilities

² Net interest income divided by total interest-earning assets



(dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015					June 30, 2014
	Average Balance			Yield/Cost		Average Balance			Yield/Cost
Assets
Interest-earning assets
Loans, including loans held-for-sale	$	803,086		4.38	%	$	559,198		4.58	%
Securities - taxable	159,729			2.10	%	169,591			2.06	%
Securities - non-taxable	3,925			3.03	%	3,600			3.25	%
Other earning assets	45,342			0.70	%	73,345			0.42	%
Total interest-earning assets	1,012,082			3.85	%	805,734			3.67	%

Allowance for loan losses	(6,215		)			(5,436		)
Noninterest earning-assets	34,864					40,262
Total assets	$	1,040,731				$	840,560

Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Regular savings accounts	$	22,991		0.58	%	$	18,784		0.60	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits	75,752			0.55	%	71,439			0.55	%
Money market accounts	278,185			0.72	%	265,119			0.73	%
Certificates and brokered deposits	415,566			1.37	%	339,053			1.53	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	792,494			1.04	%	694,395			1.10	%
Other borrowed funds	123,680			1.44	%	29,873			4.21	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	916,174			1.09	%	724,268			1.23	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits	21,477					18,492
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities	4,488					5,570
Total liabilities	942,139					748,330

Shareholders' equity	98,592					92,230
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,040,731				$	840,560

Interest rate spread ¹				2.76	%				2.44	%
Net interest margin ²				2.86	%				2.56	%

¹ Yield on total interest-earning assets minus cost of total interest-bearing liabilities

² Net interest income divided by total interest-earning assets

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table illustrates the impact of changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest rates on net interest income for the periods indicated. The change in interest not due solely to volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.



	Rate/Volume Analysis of Net Interest Income
(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 vs. March 31, 2015 Due to Changes in								Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 vs. June 30, 2014 Due to Changes in									Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 vs. June 30, 2014 Due to Changes in
	Volume		Rate			Net			Volume			Rate			Net			Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income
Loans, including loans held-for-sale	$	584	$	69		$	653		$	3,908		$	(1,436	)	$	2,472		$	6,335		$	(1,602	)	$	4,733
Securities – taxable	159		64			223			(369		)	327			(42		)	(154		)	85			(69		)
Securities – non-taxable	59		—			59			59			—			59			10			(9		)	1
Other earning assets	36		(28		)	8			(3		)	32			29			(147		)	154			7
Total	838		105			943			3,595			(1,077		)	2,518			6,044			(1,372		)	4,672

Interest expense
Interest-bearing deposits	184		—			184			718			(503		)	215			824			(516		)	308
Other borrowed funds	473		(512		)	(39		)	1,468			(1,364		)	104			1,580			(1,323		)	257
Total	657		(512		)	145			2,186			(1,867		)	319			2,404			(1,839		)	565

Increase in net interest income	$	181	$	617		$	798		$	1,409		$	790		$	2,199		$	3,640		$	467		$	4,107

Net interest income for the second quarter 2015 was $7.6 million , increasing $2.2 million , or 40.9% , compared to second quarter 2014 of $5.4 million . Net interest margin was 2.87% for the second quarter 2015 compared to 2.61% for the second quarter 2014 . The increases in net interest income and net interest margin were primarily driven by an increase of $231.7 million , or 28.1% , in the balance of average interest-earning assets for the second quarter 2015 compared to the second quarter 2014 , as well as changes in the composition of the Company’s balance sheet which resulted in an increase in the yield earned on interest-earning assets and a decrease in the cost of funds related to interest-bearing liabilities.

The increase in net interest income for the second quarter 2015 , as compared to the second quarter 2014 , was the result of a $2.5 million , or 33.1% , increase in total interest income to $10.1 million for the second quarter 2015 from $7.6 million for the second quarter 2014 . The increase in total interest income was partially offset by a $0.3 million , or 14.2% , increase in total interest expense to $2.6 million for the second quarter 2015 from $2.2 million for the second quarter 2014 .

The increase in total interest income was due primarily to an increase in interest earned on loans resulting from an increase of $245.1 million , or 42.2% , in the average balance of loans, including loans held-for-sale, for the second quarter 2015 compared to the second quarter 2014 . The increase in total interest income was partially offset by a decline in the yield earned on loans, including loans held-for-sale, of 15 basis points (“bps”).

The increase in total interest expense was driven primarily by an increase in interest expense related to interest-bearing deposits as a result of a $114.1 million , or 16.1% , increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits for the second quarter 2015 compared to the second quarter 2014 . The increase in total interest expense was partially offset by a decline in the cost of funds relating to interest-bearing deposits of 5 bps. The increase in total interest expense was also driven by an increase in interest expense related to other borrowed funds as a result of $102.9 million , or 297.9% , increase in the average balance of other borrowed funds for the second quarter 2015 compared to the second quarter 2014 . The increase in total interest expense was partially offset by a decline in the cost of other borrowed funds of 245 bps.

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $14.3 million , increasing $4.1 million , or 40.1% , compared to $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 . Net interest margin was 2.86% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2.56% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 . The increases in net interest income and net interest margin were primarily driven by an increase in average interest-earning assets of $206.3 million , or 25.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 , as well as changes in the composition of the Company’s balance sheet which resulted in an increase in the yield earned on interest-earning assets and a decrease in the cost of funds related to interest-bearing liabilities.

The increase in net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 , as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 , was the result of a $4.7 million , or 31.9% , increase in total interest income to $19.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $14.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 . The increase in total interest income was partially offset by a $0.6 million , or 12.8% , increase in total interest expense to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 .

The increase in total interest income was due primarily to an increase in interest earned on loans resulting from an increase of $243.9 million , or 43.6% , in the average balance of loans, including loans held-for-sale, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 . The increase in total interest income was partially offset by a decline in the yield earned on loans, including loans held-for-sale, of 20 bps.

The increase in total interest expense was driven primarily by an increase in interest expense related to interest-bearing deposits as a result of a $98.1 million , or 14.1% , increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 , partially offset by a decline of 6 bps in the cost of funds related to these deposits. Interest expense related to other borrowed funds also contributed to the increase in total interest expense due to a $93.8 million , or 314.0% , increase in average other borrowed funds for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 , partially offset by a decline of 277 bps in the cost of other borrowed funds.

Noninterest Income

The following table presents noninterest income for the five most recent quarters and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 .



(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended															Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Service charges and fees	$	193		$	176		$	174		$	179		$	187		$	369		$	354
Mortgage banking activities	2,214			2,886			1,842			1,638			1,229			5,100			2,129
Gain on sale of securities	—			—			—			54			125			—			484
Loss on asset disposals	(33		)	(14		)	(19		)	(28		)	(18		)	(47		)	(31		)
Other	102			100			101			100			99			202			197
Total noninterest income	$	2,476		$	3,148		$	2,098		$	1,943		$	1,622		$	5,624		$	3,133

During the second quarter 2015 , noninterest income totaled $2.5 million , representing an increase of $0.9 million , or 52.7% compared to $1.6 million for the second quarter 2014 . The increase in noninterest income was driven by an increase of $1.0 million , or 80.1% , in mortgage banking activities resulting from an improvement in gain on sale margin and higher origination volumes. The increase in mortgage banking activities was partially offset by a $0.1 million decline in gains related to sales of securities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015 , noninterest income totaled $5.6 million , representing an increase of $2.5 million , or 79.5% , compared to $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 . The increase in noninterest income was driven by an increase of $3.0 million , or 139.5% , in mortgage banking activities resulting from an improvement in gain on sale margin and higher origination volumes. The increase in mortgage banking activities was partially offset by a $0.5 million decline in gains related to sales of securities.

Noninterest Expense

The following table presents noninterest expense for the five most recent quarters and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 .



(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014
Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,787	$	3,578	$	3,129	$	3,265	$	2,948	$	7,365	$	5,955
Marketing, advertising and promotion	334		452		307		381		387		786		767
Consulting and professional fees	564		592		595		409		465		1,156		898
Data processing	233		248		277		244		239		481		473
Loan expenses	181		181		168		208		136		362		250
Premises and equipment	691		642		733		741		761		1,333		1,462
Deposit insurance premium	160		150		154		155		138		310		282
Other	377		414		516		382		486		791		911
Total noninterest expense	$	6,327	$	6,257	$	5,879	$	5,785	$	5,560	$	12,584	$	10,998

Noninterest expense for the second quarter 2015 was $6.3 million , compared to $5.6 million for the second quarter 2014 . The increase of $0.7 million , or 13.8% , compared to the second quarter 2014 was due to an increase of $0.8 million in salaries and employee benefits and an increase of $0.1 million in consulting and professional fees , slightly offset by decreases of $0.1 million in premises and equipment expenses and $0.1 million in other expenses. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was attributable to increased headcount driven by the Company's continued growth. The increase in consulting and professional fees was due primarily to an increase in legal and consulting expenses associated with the Company's expansion from the year ago quarter.

Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $12.6 million , compared to $11.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 . The increase of $1.6 million , or 14.4% , compared to June 30, 2014 was due to an increase of $1.4 million in salaries and employee benefits , an increase of $0.3 million in consulting and professional fees , and an increase of $0.1 million in loan expenses , slightly offset by decreases of $0.1 million in premises and equipment expenses and $0.1 million in other expenses. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was attributable to increased headcount driven by the Company's continued growth and increased equity compensation expense. The increase in consulting and professional fees was due primarily to an increase in legal and consulting expenses associated with the Company's expansion from the year ago period.

Financial Condition

The following table presents summary balance sheet data for the last five quarters.



(dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:	June 30, 2015		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014
Total assets	$	1,104,645	$	1,035,677	$	970,503	$	926,883	$	868,107
Loans receivable	814,243		767,682		732,426		695,929		631,678
Securities available-for-sale	190,767		163,676		137,518		128,203		159,528
Loans held-for-sale	29,872		27,584		34,671		27,547		21,466
Noninterest-bearing deposits	20,994		19,178		21,790		20,359		19,065
Interest-bearing deposits	835,509		801,991		736,808		717,611		725,108
Total deposits	856,503		821,169		758,598		737,970		744,173
Total shareholders' equity	99,908		99,362		96,785		94,774		94,534

Total assets were $1.1 billion at June 30, 2015 , compared to $970.5 million at December 31, 2014 , representing an increase of $134.1 million , or 13.8% . The increase in total assets was due primarily to increases of $81.8 million , or 11.2% , in loans receivable, and $53.2 million , or 38.7% , in securities available-for-sale.

Loan Portfolio Analysis

The following table provides a detailed listing of the Company's loan portfolio for the last five quarters.



(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2015					March 31, 2015					December 31, 2014					September 30, 2014					June 30, 2014
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial	$	89,316		11.0	%	$	83,849		11.0	%	$	77,232		10.5	%	$	72,099		10.4	%	$	71,997		11.4	%
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	39,405			4.8	%	38,536			5.0	%	34,295			4.7	%	31,637			4.5	%	26,629			4.2	%
Investor commercial real estate	20,163			2.5	%	18,491			2.4	%	22,069			3.0	%	20,567			3.0	%	18,467			2.9	%
Construction	20,155			2.5	%	26,847			3.5	%	24,883			3.4	%	17,936			2.6	%	24,371			3.9	%
Single tenant lease financing	279,891			34.4	%	227,229			29.6	%	192,608			26.3	%	165,738			23.8	%	143,547			22.7	%
Total commercial loans	448,930			55.2	%	394,952			51.5	%	351,087			47.9	%	307,977			44.3	%	285,011			45.1	%
Consumer loans
Residential mortgage	207,703			25.5	%	215,910			28.1	%	220,612			30.1	%	220,499			31.7	%	175,114			27.7	%
Home equity	49,662			6.1	%	54,838			7.2	%	58,434			8.0	%	61,799			8.9	%	63,725			10.1	%
Other consumer	103,157			12.6	%	97,192			12.6	%	97,094			13.3	%	100,074			14.3	%	102,843			16.3	%
Total consumer loans	360,522			44.2	%	367,940			47.9	%	376,140			51.4	%	382,372			54.9	%	341,682			54.1	%
Deferred loan origination costs and premiums and discounts on purchased loans	4,791			0.6	%	4,790			0.6	%	5,199			0.7	%	5,580			0.8	%	4,985			0.8	%
Total loans receivable	814,243			100.0	%	767,682			100.0	%	732,426			100.0	%	695,929			100.0	%	631,678			100.0	%
Allowance for loan losses	(7,073		)			(6,378		)			(5,800		)			(5,464		)			(5,140		)
Net loans receivable	$	807,170				$	761,304				$	726,626				$	690,465				$	626,538

Total loans receivable as of June 30, 2015 were $814.2 million , increasing $81.8 million , or 11.2% , compared to $732.4 million as of December 31, 2014 . Total commercial loans increased $97.8 million , or 27.9% , as of June 30, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014 due to increases of $87.3 million , or 45.3% , in single tenant lease financing, $12.1 million , or 15.6% , in commercial and industrial, and $5.1 million , or 14.9% , in owner-occupied commercial real estate. These increases were partially offset by declines of $4.7 million , or 19.0% , in construction and $1.9 million , or 8.6% , in investor commercial real estate.

Total consumer loans declined $15.6 million , or 4.2% , as of June 30, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014 due primarily to decreases of $12.9 million , or 5.9% , in residential mortgages and $8.8 million , or 15.0% , in home equity loans. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $6.1 million , or 6.2% , in other consumer loans.

Asset Quality



(dollars in thousands)
	June 30, 2015			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial loans:
Investor commercial real estate	$	—		$	83		$	87		$	89		$	1,048
Total commercial loans	—			83			87			89			1,048
Consumer loans:
Residential mortgage	119			61			25			57			26
Other consumer	69			102			123			153			86
Total consumer loans	188			163			148			210			112
Total nonaccrual loans	188			246			235			299			1,160

Past Due 90 days and accruing loans
Consumer loans:
Residential mortgage	—			—			57			96			—
Other consumer	—			—			4			5			17
Total consumer loans	—			—			61			101			17
Total past due 90 days and accruing loans	—			—			61			101			17

Total nonperforming loans	188			246			296			400			1,177

Other real estate owned
Investor commercial real estate	4,488			4,488			4,488			4,488			4,371
Residential mortgage	—			—			—			57			293
Total other real estate owned	4,488			4,488			4,488			4,545			4,664

Other nonperforming assets	89			84			82			122			120

Total nonperforming assets	$	4,765		$	4,818		$	4,866		$	5,067		$	5,961

Total nonperforming loans to total loans receivable	0.02		%	0.03		%	0.04		%	0.06		%	0.19		%
Total nonperforming assets to total assets	0.43		%	0.47		%	0.50		%	0.55		%	0.69		%

Nonperforming loans are comprised of total nonaccrual loans and loans 90 days past due and accruing. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans, other real estate owned and other nonperforming assets which consist of repossessed assets.

Troubled Debt Restructurings



(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2015		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014
Troubled debt restructurings – nonaccrual	$	—	$	5	$	5	$	25	$	26
Troubled debt restructurings – performing	1,150		1,164		1,125		1,154		1,189
Total troubled debt restructurings	$	1,150	$	1,169	$	1,130	$	1,179	$	1,215

Total nonperforming loans declined $0.1 million , or 36.5% , to $0.2 million as of June 30, 2015 compared to $0.3 million as of December 31, 2014 . Total nonperforming assets declined $0.1 million , or 2.1% , as of June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 . The decreases in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets were due primarily to declines in loans 90 days past due and accruing and nonaccrual loans. As a result, the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans receivable improved to 0.02% as of June 30, 2015 compared to 0.04% as of December 31, 2014 and the ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets improved to 0.43% as of June 30, 2015 compared to 0.50% as of December 31, 2014 .

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , the Company had one commercial property in other real estate owned with a carrying value of $4.5 million. This property consists of two buildings which are residential units adjacent to a

university campus. Improvements to the property have been made in collaboration with the university and the property continues to be occupied.

Allowance for Loan Losses



(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended															Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,378		$	5,800		$	5,464		$	5,140		$	5,388		$	5,800		$	5,426
Provision (credit) charged to expense	304			442			387			(112		)	(73		)	746			74
Losses charged off	(232		)	(228		)	(200		)	(111		)	(255		)	(460		)	(546		)
Recoveries	623			364			149			547			80			987			186
Balance, end of period	$	7,073		$	6,378		$	5,800		$	5,464		$	5,140		$	7,073		$	5,140

The allowance for loan losses was $7.1 million as of June 30, 2015 compared to $5.8 million as of December 31, 2014 . The increase of $1.3 million , or 21.9% , was due primarily to the continued growth in commercial loan balances. During the second quarter 2015 , the Company recorded net recoveries of $0.4 million compared to net charge-offs of $0.2 million during the second quarter 2014 . Similarly, during the six months ended June 30, 2015 , the Company recorded net recoveries of $0.5 million compared to $0.4 million of net charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2014 . During the second quarter 2015 , the net recoveries were driven primarily by a $0.5 million recovery of a commercial real estate loan that had been previously charged-off. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 , the net recoveries were driven primarily by a $0.5 million recovery of a commercial real estate loan that had been previously charged-off and a $0.4 million recovery of a residential mortgage loan, of which $0.3 million related to the recapture of principal previously charged-off.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans receivable increased to 0.87% as of June 30, 2015 compared to 0.79% as of December 31, 2014 , and as a percentage of nonperforming loans increased to 3,762.2% as of June 30, 2015 compared to 1,959.5% as of December 31, 2014 . The increase in the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans receivable was primarily driven by a $1.3 million increase in the allowance related to total commercial loans at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014. Under the Company’s allowance for loan losses methodology, commercial loans are currently assigned higher reserve factors than consumer loans. Since December 31, 2014, commercial loan growth has outpaced consumer loan growth and as of June 30, 2015 total commercial loans represented 55.2% of total loans receivable compared to 47.9% as of December 31, 2014. The combination of higher growth and higher reserve factors related to commercial loans resulted in the increased percentage of allowance for loan losses to total loans receivable. The increase in the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was also due to the increase in the allowance related to total commercial loans as well as the decline in nonperforming loans.

Investment Securities

The following table presents the book value and approximate fair value of our investment portfolio by security type for the last five quarters.



(dollars in thousands)
Amortized Cost	June 30, 2015		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	27,993	$	28,238	$	13,680	$	16,049	$	20,204
Municipal securities	15,219		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-backed securities	107,055		112,401		117,134		111,524		137,189
Asset-backed securities	19,430		19,428		4,913		—		—
Corporate securities	20,000		—		—		—		—
Other securities	3,000		3,000		2,000		2,000		2,000
Total securities available-for-sale	$	192,697	$	163,067	$	137,727	$	129,573	$	159,393

Approximate Fair Value	June 30, 2015		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	27,572	$	28,063	$	13,552	$	15,725	$	19,928
Municipal securities	14,779		—		—		—		—
Mortgage-backed securities	106,674		113,132		117,048		110,489		137,605
Asset-backed securities	19,452		19,457		4,912		—		—
Corporate securities	19,305		—		—		—		—
Other securities	2,985		3,024		2,006		1,989		1,995
Total securities available-for-sale	$	190,767	$	163,676	$	137,518	$	128,203	$	159,528

The approximate fair value of investment securities available-for-sale increased $53.2 million , or 38.7% , to $190.8 million as of June 30, 2015 compared to $137.5 million as of December 31, 2014 . The increase was due primarily to increases of $19.3 million in corporate securities, $14.8 million in municipal securities, $14.5 million in asset-backed securities and $14.0 million in U.S. government-sponsored agencies, partially offset by a decrease of $10.4 million in mortgage-backed securities. During the six month period ended June 30, 2015 , the Company deployed funds generated through deposit growth to purchase additional securities to further diversify the securities portfolio and enhance net interest income while supporting liquidity and interest rate risk management.

Deposits

The following table presents the composition of the Company's deposit base for the last five quarters.



(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2015				March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014				September 30, 2014				June 30, 2014
Regular savings accounts	$	24,405	2.8	%	$	23,367	2.8	%	$	20,776	2.7	%	$	17,503	2.4	%	$	16,861	2.3	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits	20,994		2.5	%	19,178		2.3	%	21,790		2.9	%	20,359		2.8	%	19,065		2.5	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits	77,822		9.1	%	82,982		10.1	%	74,238		9.8	%	71,762		9.7	%	73,843		9.9	%
Money market accounts	278,791		32.5	%	280,740		34.2	%	267,046		35.2	%	275,901		37.4	%	267,854		36.0	%
Certificates of deposit	440,936		51.5	%	401,347		48.9	%	361,202		47.6	%	334,636		45.3	%	348,752		46.9	%
Brokered deposits	13,555		1.6	%	13,555		1.7	%	13,546		1.8	%	17,809		2.4	%	17,798		2.4	%
Total	$	856,503	100.0	%	$	821,169	100.0	%	$	758,598	100.0	%	$	737,970	100.0	%	$	744,173	100.0	%

Total deposits increased $97.9 million , or 12.9% , to $856.5 million as of June 30, 2015 as compared to $758.6 million as of December 31, 2014 . This increase was due primarily to increases of $79.7 million , or 22.1% , in certificates of deposit , $11.7 million , or 4.4% , in money market accounts , $3.6 million , or 17.5% , in regular savings accounts , and $3.6 million , or 4.8% , in interest-bearing demand deposits.

Capital

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by state and federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.

The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to a phase-in period for certain provisions. Quantitative measures established by the Basel III Capital Rules to ensure capital adequacy require the maintenance of minimum amounts and ratios of Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital, as defined in the regulations, to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to adjusted quarterly average assets (“Leverage Ratio”).

When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules will require the Company and the Bank to maintain: 1) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (resulting in a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 7.0% upon full implementation); 2) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation); 3) a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum Total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation); and 4) a minimum Leverage Ratio of 4.0%.

The implementation of the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and be phased in over a four-year period increasing by increments of that amount on each subsequent January 1 until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Failure to maintain the minimum Common Equity Tier 1 ratio plus the capital conservation buffer will result in potential restrictions on a banking institution’s ability to pay dividends, repurchase stock and/or pay discretionary compensation to its employees.

The following table presents actual and required capital ratios as of June 30, 2015 for the Company and the Bank under the Basel III Capital Rules. The minimum required capital amounts presented include the minimum required capital levels as of June 30, 2015 based on the phase-in provisions of the Basel III Capital Rules and the minimum required capital levels as of January 1, 2019 when the Basel III Capital Rules have been fully phased-in. Capital levels required to be considered well capitalized are based upon prompt corrective action regulations, as amended to reflect the changes under the Basel III Capital Rules.



(dollars in thousands)	Actual				Minimum Capital Required - Basel III Phase-In Schedule				Minimum Capital Required - Basel III Fully Phased-In				Required to be Considered Well Capitalized
	Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount	Ratio
As of June 30, 2015:
Common Equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	$	96,449	11.12	%	$	39,041	4.50	%	$	60,731	7.00	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	88,831		10.27	%	38,940		4.50	%	60,574		7.00	%	56,247	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	96,449		11.12	%	52,055		6.00	%	73,744		8.50	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	88,831		10.27	%	51,920		6.00	%	73,554		8.50	%	69,227	8.00	%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	106,522		12.28	%	69,406		8.00	%	91,096		10.50	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	95,904		11.08	%	69,227		8.00	%	90,861		10.50	%	86,534	10.00	%
Leverage ratio
Consolidated	96,449		8.93	%	43,216		4.00	%	43,216		4.00	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	88,831		8.24	%	43,108		4.00	%	43,108		4.00	%	53,885	5.00	%

The following table presents actual and required capital ratios as of December 31, 2014 for the Company and the Bank under the regulatory capital rules then in effect.



(dollars in thousands)	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirement				Minimum to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Actions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio
As of December 31, 2014:
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	$	92,233	12.55	%	$	29,388	4.00	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	83,377		11.38	%	29,300		4.00	%	43,950	6.00	%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	101,033		13.75	%	58,777		8.00	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	89,177		12.17	%	58,600		8.00	%	73,250	10.00	%
Leverage ratio
Consolidated	92,233		9.87	%	37,381		4.00	%	N/A	N/A
Bank	83,377		8.94	%	37,303		4.00	%	46,629	5.00	%

Shareholders' Dividends

The Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend for the second quarter 2015 of $0.06 per share of common stock payable July 15, 2015 to shareholders of record on June 30, 2015. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors also declared a cash dividend for the third quarter 2015 of $0.06 per share of common stock payable October 15, 2015 to shareholders of record on September 30, 2015. The Company expects to continue to pay dividends on a quarterly basis; however, the declaration and amount of any future dividends will be determined by the Board of Directors on the basis of financial condition, earnings, regulatory constraints, and other factors.

Capital Resources

We believe our capital resources are sufficient to meet our current and expected needs, including any cash dividends we may pay. However, we may require additional capital resources to accommodate continued growth.

Liquidity

Liquidity management is the process used by the Company to manage the continuing flow of funds necessary to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost while also maintaining safe and sound operations. Our liquidity, represented by cash and investment securities, is a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, maturing loans and investment securities, access to wholesale funding sources and collateralized borrowings. While scheduled payments and maturities of loans and investment securities are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Therefore, we supplement deposit growth and enhance interest rate risk management through borrowings, which are generally advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

We maintain cash and investment securities that qualify as liquid assets to maintain adequate liquidity to ensure safe and sound operations and meet our financial commitments. At June 30, 2015 , on a consolidated basis, the Company had $222.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing time deposits and investment securities available-for-sale and $29.9 million in loans held-for-sale that were generally available for our cash needs. We can also generate funds from wholesale funding sources and collateralized borrowings. At June 30, 2015 , the Bank had the ability to borrow an additional $124.5 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and correspondent bank Fed Funds lines of credit.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its own operating expenses, many of which are paid to the Bank, the Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its common stockholders and interest and principal on outstanding debt. The Company’s primary sources of funds are cash maintained at the holding company level and dividends from the Bank, the payment of which is subject to regulatory limits. At June 30, 2015 , the Company, on an unconsolidated basis, had $7.2 million in cash generally available for its cash needs, which is in excess of its current annual regular shareholder dividend and operating expenses.

We use our sources of funds primarily to meet ongoing financial commitments, including withdrawals by depositors, credit commitments to borrowers, operating expenses and capital expenditures. At June 30, 2015 , approved outstanding loan commitments, including unused lines of credit, amounted to $130.4 million . Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less at June 30, 2015 totaled $262.3 million . Generally, we believe that a majority of maturing deposits will remain with the Bank.

Management is not aware of any other events or regulatory requirements that, if implemented, are likely to have a material effect on either the Company’s or the Bank’s liquidity.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This Management's Discussion and Analysis contains financial information determined by methods other than in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Non-GAAP financial measures, specifically tangible common equity, tangible assets, average tangible common equity, tangible book value per common share, return on average tangible common equity and tangible common equity to tangible assets are used by the Company’s management to measure the strength of its capital and its ability to generate earnings on tangible capital invested by its shareholders. Although we believe these non-GAAP measures provide a greater understanding of our business, they should not be considered a substitute for financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the following table for the past five quarters and six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 .



(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)	Three Months Ended															Six Months Ended
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)	June 30, 2015			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Total equity - GAAP	$	99,908		$	99,362		$	96,785		$	94,774		$	94,534		$	99,908		$	94,534
Adjustments:
Goodwill	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)
Tangible common equity	$	95,221		$	94,675		$	92,098		$	90,087		$	89,847		$	95,221		$	89,847

Total assets - GAAP	$	1,104,645		$	1,035,677		$	970,503		$	926,883		$	868,107		$	1,104,645		$	868,107
Adjustments:
Goodwill	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)
Tangible assets	$	1,099,958		$	1,030,990		$	965,816		$	922,196		$	863,420		$	1,099,958		$	863,420

Total common shares outstanding	4,484,513			4,484,513			4,439,575			4,439,575			4,449,619			4,484,513			4,449,619

Book value per common share	$	22.28		$	22.16		$	21.80		$	21.35		$	21.25		$	22.28		$	21.25
Effect of goodwill	(1.05		)	(1.05		)	(1.06		)	(1.06		)	(1.06		)	(1.05		)	(1.06		)
Tangible book value per common share	$	21.23		$	21.11		$	20.74		$	20.29		$	20.19		$	21.23		$	20.19

Total shareholders’ equity to assets ratio	9.04		%	9.59		%	9.97		%	10.23		%	10.89		%	9.04		%	10.89		%
Effect of goodwill	(0.38		)	(0.41		)	(0.43		)	(0.46		)	(0.48		)	(0.38		)	(0.48		)
Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio	8.66		%	9.18		%	9.54		%	9.77		%	10.41		%	8.66		%	10.41		%

Total average equity - GAAP	$	99,333		$	97,844		$	95,832		$	94,840		$	92,641		$	98,592		$	92,230
Adjustments:
Average goodwill	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)	(4,687		)
Average tangible common equity	$	94,646		$	93,157		$	91,145		$	90,153		$	87,954		$	93,905		$	87,543

Return on average shareholders' equity	9.15		%	8.55		%	6.07		%	5.36		%	4.23		%	8.85		%	3.45		%
Effect of goodwill	0.45		%	0.43		%	0.31		%	0.28		%	0.23		%	0.44		%	0.18		%
Return on average tangible common equity	9.60		%	8.98		%	6.38		%	5.64		%	4.46		%	9.29		%	3.63		%

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 .

Future Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 11 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into financial transactions to extend credit and forms of commitments that may be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. We enter into forward contracts relating to our mortgage banking business to hedge the exposures we have from commitments to extend new residential mortgage loans to our customers and from our mortgage loans held-for-sale. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , we had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $60.8 million and $55.1 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year. We do not believe that off-balance sheet arrangements have had or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. The primary source of market risk for the Company is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and the value of the Company's equity resulting from changes in market interest rates and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there are timing and volume differences between the amount of our interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid, withdrawn, re-priced or mature in specified periods. We seek to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates.

We monitor the Company's interest rate risk position using income simulation models and economic value of equity (“EVE”) sensitivity analysis that capture both short-term and long-term interest rate risk exposure. Income simulation involves forecasting net interest income (“NII”) under a variety of interest rate scenarios. We use EVE sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of changes in interest rates on long-term cash flows, income and capital. EVE is calculated by discounting the cash flows for all balance sheet instruments under different interest-rate scenarios. Modeling the sensitivity of NII and EVE to changes in market interest rates is highly dependent on the assumptions incorporated into the modeling process. We continually review and refine the assumptions used in our interest rate risk modeling.

Presented below is the estimated impact on the Company's NII and EVE position as of June 30, 2015 , assuming parallel shifts in interest rates:



	% Change from Base Case for Parallel Changes in Rates
	-100 Basis Points ¹		+100 Basis Points		+200 Basis Points
NII - next twelve months	(6.57	)%	2.26	%	1.63	%
EVE	(5.28	)%	(2.18	)%	(4.86	)%

¹ Because certain current interest rates are at or below 1.00%, the 100 basis point downward shock assumes that certain corresponding interest rates approach an implied floor that, in effect, reflects a decrease of less than the full 100 basis point downward shock.

Our objective is to manage the balance sheet with a bias toward asset sensitivity while simultaneously balancing the potential earnings impact of this strategy. A “risk-neutral” position refers to the absence of a strong bias toward either asset or liability sensitivity. An “asset sensitive” position refers to when the characteristics of the balance sheet are expected to generate higher net interest income when interest rates, primarily short-term rates, increase as rates earned on interest-earning assets would reprice upward more quickly or in greater quantities than rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities would reprice. A “liability sensitive” position refers to when the characteristics of the balance sheet are expected to generate lower net interest income when short-term interest rates increase as rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities would reprice upward more quickly or in greater quantities than rates earned on interest-earning assets.


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified in SEC rules and forms. These controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, we have recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management is required to apply judgment in evaluating its controls and procedures.

We performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, to assess the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2015 .

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, the Bank is a party to legal actions arising from its normal business activities.


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 .


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.


ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.


ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.


ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

Unless otherwise indicated, all documents incorporated into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q by reference to a document filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act are located under SEC file number 1-35750.



Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of First Internet Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to registration statement on Form 10 filed November 30, 2012)
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Internet Bancorp, as amended March 18, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012)
10.1		First Amendment to Office Lease dated as of July 1, 2015, by and between First Internet Bancorp and First Internet Bank of Indiana
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1		Section 1350 Certifications
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



		FIRST INTERNET BANCORP

Date: 8/5/2015	By	/s/ David B. Becker
		David B. Becker, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: 8/5/2015	By	/s/ Kenneth J. Lovik
		Kenneth J. Lovik, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.	Description	Method of Filing
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of First Internet Bancorp	Incorporated by Reference
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Internet Bancorp, as amended March 18, 2013	Incorporated by Reference
10.1	First Amendment to Office Lease dated as of July 1, 2015, by and between First Internet Bancorp and First Internet Bank of Indiana	Filed Electronically
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer	Filed Electronically
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer	Filed Electronically
32.1	Section 1350 Certifications	Filed Electronically
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed Electronically
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	Filed Electronically
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	Filed Electronically
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	Filed Electronically
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	Filed Electronically
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	Filed Electronically

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE (this " Amendment ") is made and entered into as of this 1st day of July, 2015 (the " Effective Date "), by and between FIRST INTERNET BANCORP. , an Indiana corporation (the " Landlord "), and FIRST INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA (the " Tenant ").

W I T N E S S E T H :

WHEREAS , Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease dated as of March 6, 2013 (the " Lease ") pursuant to which Tenant leases approximately 15,254 square feet of space on the third floor (the " Initial Premises ") in the building located at 11201 USA Parkway, Fishers, Indiana, as more particularly set forth in the Lease; and

WHEREAS , Landlord and Tenant desire to enter into this Amendment to expand the Initial Premises and otherwise amend the Lease as herein provided.

NOW THEREFORE , for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby mutually agree as follows:

1. Integration of Amendment and Lease . This Amendment and the Lease shall be deemed to be, for all purposes, one instrument. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of this Amendment and the terms and provisions of the Lease, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall, in all instances, control and prevail.

2. Defined Terms . Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Lease. As used in this Amendment, the following terms shall have the respective meanings indicated below:

(a) " Additional Premises " shall mean the premises on the first floor of the Building consisting of approximately 19,364 rentable square feet, as shown on the plan attached hereto as Exhibit A ; and

(b) " Additional Premises Commencement Date " shall mean the earlier of (i) Tenant's occupancy of the Additional Premises for business purposes or (ii) Landlord's Substantial Completion of the Additional Premises.

3. Additional Premises . Effective as of the Additional Premises Commencement Date:

(a) the Leased Premises shall consist of the Initial Premises and the Additional Premises;

(b) the total square footage of the Leased Premises shall be increased by the square footage of the Additional Premises (i.e., from 15,254 square feet to an aggregate total of 34,618 square feet);

(d) the Term of the Lease with respect to the Additional Premises shall be coterminous with the Term of the Lease for the Initial Premises (i.e., shall expire on May 31, 2018, subject to extension or earlier termination as provided in the Lease).

4. Rent .

(a) Initial Premises Minimum Rent . Tenant shall continue to pay Minimum Rent for the Initial Premises as set forth in the Lease until the Additional Premises Commencement Date.

(b) Minimum Rent following the Additional Premises Commencement Date . Effective as of the Additional Premises Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Minimum Annual Rent for the Leased Premises equal to $640,433 (i.e., $18.50 per square foot of the Leased Premises), payable in equal monthly installments of $53,369.42 each.

(c) Additional Rent . Tenant shall continue to pay Additional Rent for the Leased Premises in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Lease, except, however, that effective as of the Additional Premises Commencement Date, Tenant's Cost Percentage shall be increased as provided in Section 3(c) above.

5. Additional Premises Workletter Agreement . Landlord shall perform, or cause to be performed, all work required to be performed by Landlord pursuant to the Additional Premises Workletter Agreement.

6. Time for Substantial Completion . Subject to delays resulting from Tenant Delays (as that term is defined in the Additional Premises Workletter Agreement), Landlord shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Additional Premises to be Substantially Completed according to the Plans (as that term is defined in the Additional Premises Workletter Agreement) on or before the Scheduled Additional Premises Commencement Date. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein (including the fact that the Term for the Additional Premises has not commenced), the obligation of the Tenant to pay Minimum Rent and Additional Rent for the Additional Premises hereunder shall commence on the date, as reasonably determined by Landlord, on which the Additional Premises would have been Substantially Completed but for Tenant Delays. Landlord shall provide Tenant with not less than five (5) days' advance written notice of the estimated date of Substantial Completion if such date varies by more than five (5) days from the Scheduled Additional Premises Commencement Date. In the event Landlord fails to provide such notice, and if such notice is required, the date of Substantial Completion shall not be earlier than ten (10) days from the date of such notice from Landlord.

7. Acceptance of Additional Premises . Upon Substantial Completion of the Additional Premises, and prior to Tenant's occupancy thereof, Tenant shall deliver to Landlord a letter agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C (the " Additional Premises Letter Agreement "). By its execution of the Additional Premises Letter Agreement and occupancy of the Additional Premises, Tenant shall be deemed to represent and certify that it has examined the Additional Premises and that it thereby accepts the Additional Premises in its condition at the time, subject to latent defects which could not be reasonably observed by a professional inspection of the Additional Premises, Punch List Items (as that term is defined in the Additional Premises Workletter Agreement) set forth in the Additional Premises Letter Agreement, and Landlord's obligations set forth in Section 6.6 of the Lease. Landlord shall review the Punch List Items with Tenant and correct all undisputed Punch List Items within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Additional Premises Letter Agreement; provided that, if any Punch List Item cannot be corrected within such thirty (30) day period despite reasonable diligence by Landlord, then, so long as Landlord commences correction of such Punch List Item within such thirty (30) day period and diligently pursues such correction to completion, no default by Landlord shall be deemed to have occurred. Except as expressly provided above, Tenant, by occupying the Additional Premises, is accepting the same in its "as-is" condition, without warranties of any type, expressed or implied.

8. Delayed Completion . If the Additional Premises is not Substantially Completed on or before the Scheduled Additional Premises Commencement Date; then, except as otherwise provided in Section 6 of this Amendment with respect to delays in Substantial Completion of the Additional Premises caused by Tenant Delays, (a) as Tenant's sole and exclusive remedy, the obligation of Tenant to pay Rent shall not commence until the date the Additional Premises is Substantially Completed (or such earlier date as Tenant occupies the Additional Premises); and (b) Landlord shall not be liable to Tenant for any loss, cost or damage arising from such delay.

9. Lease in Full Force and Effect . Except as expressly provided herein, all of the terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

[Signatures On The Following Page]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.



LANDLORD: FIRST INTERNET BANCORP. By: /s/ David B. Becker David Becker, Chief Executive Officer	TENANT: FIRST INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA By: /s/ C. Charles Perfetti C. Charles Perfetti, Senior Vice President

EXHIBIT A

ADDITIONAL PREMISES

Exhibit A, Page 1

Exhibit A, Page 2

Exhibit A, Page 3

EXHIBIT B

ADDITIONAL PREMISES WORKLETTER AGREEMENT


Re:	Additional Premises Workletter Agreement for the Building located at 11201 USA Parkway, Fishers, Indiana.

Tenant: First Internet Bank of Indiana

Landlord: First Internet Bancorp

Tenant and Landlord are executing simultaneously with this Additional Premises Workletter Agreement (the " Additional Premises Workletter Agreement ") an amendment to the Lease (" Amendment "), covering the space referred to above, as more particularly described in the Amendment (" Additional Premises "). All terms used herein with initial capital letters and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Lease, as amended by the Amendment.

To induce Tenant to enter into the Amendment and in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained, Landlord and Tenant mutually agree as follows:


1.	Landlord shall, at its cost and expense and subject to and in accordance with the provisions of this Additional Premises Workletter Agreement, perform the following work in the Additional Premises, which work shall hereinafter be referred to as the " Additional Premises Work ."

a. See construction specifications.

Changes in the Additional Premises Work may be made, without invalidating any part of the Lease, as amended by the Amendment, or this Additional Premises Workletter Agreement, by written agreement between Landlord and Tenant hereinafter referred to as a " Change Order ." Each Change Order shall be prepared by Landlord and signed by both Tenant and Landlord stating their agreement upon all of the following:

a. The scope of the change in the Additional Premises Work;


b.	Any increase or decrease in the cost of the Additional Premises Work as a result of the change; and


c.	The manner in which the increase or decrease in the cost of the Additional Premises Work as a result of the change will be paid or credited (as applicable).

In no event shall any change be permitted without an executed Change Order.


3.	Prior to Tenant's occupancy of the Additional Premises, Tenant shall identify any Punch List Items and provide Landlord with a complete list of such Punch List Items as part of the Additional Premises Letter Agreement in the form of Exhibit C to the Amendment.


4.	All materials and installations constructed for Tenant within the Additional Premises pursuant to this Additional Premises Workletter Agreement shall become the property of the Landlord upon installation. No refund, credit or removal of said items shall be permitted at the termination of the Lease, except for the removal of those

Exhibit B, Page 1

items or improvements which Landlord requires Tenant to remove at the expiration or earlier termination of the Lease pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Lease.


5.	It is acknowledged that the Amendment provides for the Additional Space Commencement Date to occur when Landlord has "substantially completed" the Additional Premises Work to be performed by Landlord as set forth in Paragraph 1 above; provided, however, that if Landlord shall be delayed in substantially completing the Additional Premises Work as a result of the following (" Tenant Delays "):


a.	Tenant's failure to cooperate with Landlord to facilitate final approval of any plans for the work; or


b.	Tenant's request for changes in the Additional Premises Work that delay the completion of the Additional Premises Work;

Tenant's obligation to pay Minimum Rent and Additional Rent shall commence as of such earlier date, as reasonably determined by Landlord, on which the Additional Premises would have been substantially completed but for such Tenant Delays.

No part of the Additional Premises shall be deemed unavailable for occupancy by Tenant, nor shall any work which Landlord is obligated to perform in such part of the Additional Premises be deemed incomplete for the purpose of the obligation to pay Minimum Rent and Additional Rent, solely due to the non-completion of details of construction, decoration or mechanical adjustments which are minor in character and the non-completion of which does not materially interfere with the Tenant's use of the Additional Premises (" Punch List Items ").


7.	Tenant is responsible for all costs related to the repair and maintenance of any additional HVAC systems, appliances and equipment which are installed to meet Tenant's specific requirements. Tenant shall purchase a service contract for such equipment so that the equipment is covered by such service contract each year of the term of the Lease.

[Remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Signature page(s) to follow.]

Exhibit B, Page 2

This Additional Premises Workletter Agreement constitutes all of Landlord's agreement with Tenant with respect to the work to be performed by Landlord on Tenant's behalf in the Additional Premises, and no additional agreements or obligations shall be effective unless signed by both Landlord and Tenant.



LANDLORD: FIRST INTERNET BANCORP. By: /s/ David B. Becker David Becker, Chief Executive Officer	TENANT: FIRST INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA By: /s/ C. Charles Perfetti C. Charles Perfetti, Senior Vice President

[END OF ADDITIONAL PREMISES WORKLETTER]

Exhibit B, Page 3

EXHIBIT C

ADDITIONAL PREMISES LETTER AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 1 ^st day of July , 2015, between FIRST INTERNET BANCORP (hereinafter referred to as " Landlord "), and FIRST INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA (hereinafter referred to as " Tenant ").

WHEREAS, by that certain Office Lease (hereinafter called " Original Lease ") made as of March 6, 2013, Landlord leased to Tenant certain premises (the " Initial Premises "), located at 11201 USA Parkway, Fishers, Indiana, for an initial term of five (5) years, unless sooner terminated or extended as provided therein;

WHEREAS, by that certain Amendment to Office Lease made as of July 1, 2015, (hereinafter called " Amendment ", and together with the Original Lease, hereinafter called the " Lease "), Landlord leased to Tenant the Additional Premises (as defined in the Lease), for a term that is coterminous with the Term (as defined in the Lease); and

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant now desire to set forth the Additional Premises Commencement Date (as this term is defined in the Lease), and to acknowledge Tenant's acceptance of the Additional Premises.

NOW, THEREFORE, Landlord and Tenant do hereby agree as follows:


1.	The Additional Premises has been substantially completed in accordance with the terms of the Lease, excepting only: NA .


2.	Tenant has accepted possession of the Additional Premises.


3.	Except as hereby amended, the Lease shall continue in full force and effect.


4.	This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, successors and assigns.

[Remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Signature page(s) to follow.]

Exhibit C, Page 1

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.



LANDLORD: FIRST INTERNET BANCORP By: /s/ David B. Becker David Becker, Chief Executive Officer	TENANT: FIRST INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA By: /s/ C. Charles Perfetti C. Charles Perfetti, Senior Vice President

Exhibit C, Page 2

Exhibit 31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David B. Becker, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Internet Bancorp;


2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:	August 5, 2015
		/s/ David B. Becker
		David B. Becker, Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kenneth J. Lovik, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Internet Bancorp;


2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:	August 5, 2015
		/s/ Kenneth J. Lovik
		Kenneth J. Lovik, Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Internet Bancorp (the “Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David B. Becker
David B. Becker
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2015

/s/ Kenneth J. Lovik
Kenneth J. Lovik
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2015