NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND BUSINESS DESCRIPTION

Basis of Presentation —

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Affinion Holdings”), the parent of Affinion Group, Inc. (“Affinion”). In presenting these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosures, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgments and available information at the time such estimate is made. As such, actual results could differ from those estimates. In management’s opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of interim results reported. The results of operations reported for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and following the guidance of Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As permitted under such rules, certain notes and other financial information normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted; however, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do include such notes and financial information sufficient so as to make the interim information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017 (the “Form 10-K”).

Business Description — The Company develops programs and solutions that motivate and inspire loyalty. Through our proprietary technology platforms and end-to-end customer service capabilities, we design, administer and fulfill loyalty, customer engagement and insurance programs and solutions that strengthen and expand the value of customer relationships for many of the world’s largest and most respected companies. Our programs and solutions include:

In 2016, we implemented a new globalized organizational structure (the “Global Reorganization”) to better support our key strategic initiatives and enhance long-term revenue growth. This new organizational structure allows us to combine similar lines of business on common platforms and shared infrastructures on a global basis to drive best practices and efficiencies with meaningful cost savings.  In addition, we no longer materially invest in lines of business that we believe are not essential to our long-term growth prospects.  We remain committed to our business strategy of pursuing initiatives that maintain and enhance our position as a global leader in loyalty and customer engagement solutions.  The implementation of the Global Reorganization marks another major step in our strategic plan and ongoing transformation. See Note 10 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more information concerning our segment results.

5

Starting in the first quarter of 2016 , we have the following four operating segments:

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition.  The new standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The fundamental principles of the guidance are that entities should recognize revenue in a manner that reflects the timing of transfer of goods and services to customers and the amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration that an entity  expects to receive for the goods and services provided.   Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach; however entities are not permitted to adopt the standard earlier than annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with the new standard required to be adopted for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017 . We are evaluating the adoption method as well as the impact of this new accounting guidance on our consolidated financial statements.  We have formed a project implementation team with representatives from each of our operating segments and have engaged a third-party consultant to assist in our evaluation of the impact of the new guidance. As part of our assessment work to date, we have analyzed a representative sampling of customer contracts across all segments and continue to progress with a comprehensive review and assessment of the total contract population. We have not yet completed our final review of the impact of this guidance; however, we continue to review variable consideration, incremental and direct costs, potential disclosures, and our method of adoption to complete our evaluation of the impact on our consolidated financial statements.  In addition, we continue to monitor additional changes, modifications, clarifications or interpretations being undertaken by the FASB, which may impact our current conclusions . The Company expects to adopt the new standard on its effective date.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, its new standard on accounting for leases. The new standard requires lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to adopt the guidance using a modified retrospective method. The Company has formed a project implementation team and is working with representatives from each of its operating segments to compile a lease database containing all of the relevant information required to assess the impact of the new guidance. The Company expects to adopt the new standard on its effective date.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues, including presentation of debt prepayments or debt extinguishment costs, with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. For public business entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. When adopted, the new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, an impairment charge, if triggered, is calculated as the difference between a reporting unit’s carrying value and fair value, but is limited to the carrying value of the goodwill. Current guidance, however, requires an impairment charge to be calculated as the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. When adopted, the new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

6

Foreign currency translation resulted in an increase in intangible assets and accumulated amortization of $1.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, from December 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017.

Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was as follows:

Based on the Company’s amortizable intangible assets as of March 31, 2017, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2017 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $13.4 million in 2017, $7.3 million in 2018, $5.9 million in 2019, $5.5 million in 2020 and $3.7 million in 2021.

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had gross goodwill of $647.9 million and $647.2 million, respectively, and accumulated impairment losses of $429.0 million at each date. The accumulated impairment losses represent the $15.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2006 impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Global Loyalty segment (previously included in the Global Loyalty Products segment) related to the Apollo Transactions (as defined in Note 9 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements), the $31.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2012 impairing all of the goodwill assigned in connection with the acquisition of Prospectiv Direct, Inc. included in the Legacy Membership and Package segment (previously included in the former Membership Products segment) and the $292.4 million and the $89.6 million impairment losses recognized in 2014 and 2015, respectively, impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the former Membership Products segment, which has been allocated to the Legacy Membership and Package segment.

7

The changes in the Company’s carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 201 6 and the three months ended March 31, 2017 are as follows:

Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of which $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, is included in marketing expense and none and $0.1 million, respectively, is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Based on the Company’s contract rights and list fees as of March 31, 2017, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2017 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $4.3 million in 2017, $3.7 million in 2018, $3.0 million in 2019, $2.3 million in 2020 and $1.5 million in 2021.

8

On April 9, 2010, Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders (“Affinion Credit Facility”). On May 20, 2014, Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) extended the maturity to April 30, 2018 of $775.0 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans and existing senior secured revolving loans, which loans were designated as first lien term loans (the “First Lien Term Loans”), (ii) extended the maturity to October 31, 2018 of $377.9 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans on a second lien senior secured basis, which, together with additional borrowings obtained on the same terms, total $425.0 million (the “Second Lien Term Loans”), (iii) extended the maturity to January 29, 2018 of $80.0 million of the commitments (and related obligations) under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility on a first lien senior secured basis, (iv) reduced the commitments under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility by $85.0 million and (v) removed the existing financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio.  

The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. The First Lien Term Loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. The Second Lien Term Loan facility does not provide for quarterly amortization payments. The Affinion Credit Facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to First Lien Term Loans and revolving loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 5.25%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 4.25%. The interest rates with respect to Second Lien Term Loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 7.00%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 6.00%.  The weighted average interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was 6.75% for each period and the weighted average interest rate on the Second Lien Term Loan for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was 8.50% for each period. The weighted average interest rate on revolving credit facility borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was 8.0%, and 7.8%, respectively. Affinion’s obligations under the credit facility are, and Affinion’s obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of Affinion’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The Affinion Credit Facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all of the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all Affinion’s capital stock and (ii) Affinion and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by Affinion or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of Affinion and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. The Affinion Credit Facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on Affinion’s (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to: declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase Affinion’s capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of Affinion’s subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of Affinion’s subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell assets; and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Affinion Credit Facility also requires Affinion to comply with a financial maintenance covenant with a maximum ratio of senior secured debt (as defined) to EBITDA (as defined) of 4.25:1.00.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, Affinion had borrowings of $53.0 million and $17.0 million, respectively, under the revolving credit facility. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, Affinion had repayments of $53.0 million and $17.0 million, respectively, under the revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2017, Affinion had $69.2 million available for borrowing under the Affinion Credit Facility after giving effect to the issuance of $10.8 million of letters of credit.

On November 9, 2015, (a) Affinion Holdings completed a private offer to exchange (the “2015 Holdings Exchange Offer”) its outstanding 13.75%/14.50% senior secured PIK/toggle notes due 2018 (Affinion Holdings’ “2013 senior notes”) for shares of its Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Affinion Holdings’ “Common Stock”), (b) Affinion Investments, LLC (“Affinion Investments”)  completed a private offer to exchange (the “2015 Investments Exchange Offer” and, together with the 2015 Holdings Exchange Offer, the “2015 Exchange Offers”) its outstanding 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (the “Investments senior subordinated notes”) for shares of Common Stock, and (c) Affinion Holdings and Affinion International Holdings Limited (“Affinion International”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Affinion, jointly completed a rights offering giving holders of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes and the Investments senior subordinated notes the right to purchase an aggregate principal amount of $110.0 million of 7.5% Cash/PIK Senior Notes due 2018 (the “International Notes”) of Affinion International and up to 2,483,333 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate cash purchase price of $110.0 million. Under the terms of the 2015 Holdings Exchange Offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes tendered during the offer period, holders received 7.15066 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Common Stock. Under the terms of the 2015 Investments Exchange Offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes tendered during the offer period, holders received 15.52274 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Common Stock. Pursuant to the 2015 Holdings Exchange Offer, approximately $247.4 million of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior

9

notes were exchanged for 1,769,104 shares of Common Stock and pursuant to the 2015 Investments Exchange Offer, approximately $337.3 million of Investments senior subordinated notes were exchanged for 5,236,517 shares of Common Stock.

Concurrently with the 2015 Exchange Offers, Affinion Holdings and Affinion Investments successfully solicited consents (the “2015 Consent Solicitations”) from holders to certain amendments to (a) the indenture governing Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes to remove substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions and to release the collateral securing Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes, (b) the indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes to remove substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions, and (c) the note agreement governing Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes (as defined below) to remove substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions and to permit the repurchase and cancellation of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes by Affinion in the same aggregate principal amount as the aggregate principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes repurchased or redeemed by Affinion Investments at any time, including pursuant to the 2015 Investments Exchange Offer.

In connection with the 2015 Exchange Offers, Affinion Holdings and Affinion International jointly conducted a rights offering (the “2015 Rights Offering”) for International Notes and shares of Affinion Holdings’ Common Stock. The 2015 Rights Offering was for an aggregate principal amount of $110.0 million of International Notes and up to 2,483,333 shares of Common Stock. Each unit sold in the 2015 Rights Offering consisted of (1) $1,000 principal amount of International Notes and (2) 22.57576 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Common Stock, and was sold at a purchase price per unit of $1,000. Each holder that properly tendered for exchange, and did not validly withdraw, all of their Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes and the Investments senior subordinated notes in the 2015 Exchange Offers received non-certificated rights to subscribe for rights offering units. In connection with the 2015 Rights Offering, Empyrean Capital Partners, L.P. agreed to purchase any rights offering units that were unpurchased in the 2015 Rights Offering (the “Backstop”). Pursuant to the 2015 Rights Offering and the Backstop, Affinion International received cash of approximately $110.0 million in exchange for $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of International Notes and 2,021,042 shares of Common Stock and non-participating penny warrants (the “Limited Warrants”) of Affinion Holdings that are convertible into 462,266 shares of Common Stock upon certain conditions.

The International Notes bear interest at 7.5% per annum, of which 3.5% per annum will be payable in cash (“International Cash Interest”) and 4.0% per annum will be payable by increasing the principal amount of the outstanding International Notes or by issuing International Notes (“International PIK Interest”); provided, that all of the accrued interest on the International Notes from the issue date to, but not including, May 1, 2016 was payable on May 1, 2016 entirely as International PIK Interest. Interest on the International Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2016. The International Notes will mature on July 30, 2018. The International Notes are redeemable at Affinion International’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the International Notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion International, Affinion and their respective restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion International’s obligations under the International Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II, LLC (“Affinion Investments II”), and additionally including (such additional guarantors, the “Foreign Guarantors”) Affinion International Limited, Affinion International Travel HoldCo Limited, Webloyalty International Limited, Loyalty Ventures Limited, Bassae Holding B.V., Webloyalty Holdings Coöperatief U.A. and Webloyalty International S.à r.l.). The International Notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior obligations of Affinion International’s and rank equally with all of Affinion International’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to Affinion International’s and the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness.

The carrying value of the aggregate debt instruments held by the participants to the 2015 Exchange Offers and 2015 Rights Offering (including associated debt discounts, deferred financing, and accrued interest), was $945.7 million. This was compared to the fair value of the equity issued in the 2015 Exchange Offers and 2015 Rights Offering for such debt instruments, which were valued at $133.5 million as of the date of the 2015 Exchange Offers. This exceeded the undiscounted cash flows of the aggregate lending. The Company recognized a gain in the consolidated statement of operations of $318.9 million on the 2015 Exchange Offers in 2015, which represented the write-down of the carrying value of the aggregate debt instruments to the undiscounted cash flows of the continuing debt instruments. The 2015 Exchange Offers contemplated a portion of the overall debt instruments held by the participants to the 2015 Exchange Offers.

10

In connection with the recognition of the 2015 Exchange Offers and 2015 Rights Offering, the impact of these transactions is summarized as follows, including the aforementioned gain of $ 318 . 9 million (in millions).

The adjustment to the carrying value of the debt is the net impact of the aforementioned transaction and represents an adjustment of the carrying value of the First Lien Term Loans, the Second Lien Term Loans, Affinion’s 2010 senior notes (defined below) and the International Notes of $108.4 million. This amount represents the interest to be paid in cash on the continuing debt instruments held by those who participated in the exchange but were not subject to the exchange itself through the scheduled maturity of those instruments. This amount, net of amortization, increases the carrying value of the Company’s recorded long term debt at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by $56.2 million and $65.7 million, respectively. Such amounts have been and will continue to be reduced in future years as scheduled interest is paid on those remaining instruments.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion completed a private offer to exchange Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes for Investments senior subordinated notes, pursuant to which $360.0 million aggregate principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes were issued in exchange for $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes. The Investments senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The Investments senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. Affinion Investments may redeem some or all of the Investments senior subordinated notes at any time on or after December 12, 2016 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, up to 35% of the outstanding Investments senior subordinated notes were redeemable at the option of Affinion Investments, with the net proceeds raised by Affinion or Affinion Holdings in one or more equity offerings, at 113.50% of their principal amount. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, the Investments senior subordinated notes were redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” premium. The indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion Investments, any future restricted subsidiaries of Affinion Investments and one of Affinion’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries that guarantees the Investments senior subordinated notes to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion Investments’ obligations under the Investments senior subordinated notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinion Investments II. Each of Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II is an unrestricted subsidiary of Affinion and guarantees Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility but does not guarantee Affinion’s other indebtedness. The Investments senior subordinated notes and guarantee thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion Investments, as issuer, and  Affinion Investments II, as guarantor, and rank junior in right of payment to their respective guarantees of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility. As a result of the consent solicitations consummated on November 9, 2015, substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions were removed from the indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes.   

11

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged with Affinion all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer f or Affinion’s 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (Affinion’s “2013 senior subordinated notes”). Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing o n February 15, 2014. The 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. The 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at Affinion ’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative c ovenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under the 2013 senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally and f ully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments a nd Affinion Investments II). The 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion’s and rank junior to all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, pari passu with Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated indebtedness. Although Affinion Investments is the only holder of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, the trustee for the Investments sen ior subordinated notes, and holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the  Investments senior subordinated notes will have the right as third party beneficiaries to enforce the remedies available to Affinion Investments against Affinion, and Affin ion Investments will not be able to amend the covenants in the note agreement governing Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes in favor of Affinion unless it has received consent from the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the ou tstanding Investments senior subordinated notes. As a result of the consent solicitations consummated on November 9, 2015, substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions were removed from the note agreement governing A ffinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, and the repurchase and cancellation of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes by Affinion in the same aggregate principal amount as the aggregate principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes rep urchased or redeemed by Affinion Investments at any time, including pursuant to Affinion Investments’ exchange offer, was permitted.

On November 19, 2010, Affinion completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes due 2018 (Affinion’s “2010 senior notes”) which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in 2011. The 2010 senior notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The 2010 senior notes will mature on December 15, 2018. The 2010 senior notes are redeemable at Affinion’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2010 senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under the 2010 senior notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under the Affinion Credit Facility, other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II. The 2010 senior notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of Affinion and rank equally with all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are therefore effectively subordinated to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including Affinion’s obligations under the Affinion Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of Affinion’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors, including the Investments senior subordinated notes.

On April 26, 2006, Affinion issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes and applied the gross proceeds of $350.5 million to repay $349.5 million of outstanding borrowings under a then-outstanding $383.6 million senior subordinated loan facility (the “Bridge Loan”), plus accrued interest, and used cash on hand to pay fees and expenses associated with such issuance. The 2006 senior subordinated notes bore interest at 11   ¹ / ₂ % per annum, payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The 2006 senior subordinated notes matured on October 15, 2015. Affinion could have redeemed some or all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes at any time on or after October 15, 2010 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the 2006 senior subordinated notes. The 2006 senior subordinated notes were unsecured obligations of Affinion and ranked junior in right of payment with Affinion’s existing and future senior obligations and senior to Affinion’s future subordinated indebtedness. On December 12, 2013, $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes were exchanged for $360.0 million of Investments senior subordinated notes. The remaining outstanding 2006 senior subordinated notes matured on October 15, 2015.

The amended Affinion Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 2010 senior notes both contain restrictive covenants related primarily to Affinion’s ability to distribute dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. Under the Affinion Credit Facility, payment of additional dividends requires the satisfaction of various conditions, including meeting defined leverage ratios and a defined fixed charge coverage ratio, and the total dividend paid cannot exceed a calculated amount of defined available free cash flow, or requires availability under specified baskets. The covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility also require compliance with a senior secured leverage ratio. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016, Affinion did not pay any cash dividends to Affinion Holdings. Affinion was in compliance with the covenants referred to above as of March 31, 2017. Payment under each of the debt agreements may be accelerated in the event of a default. Events of default include the failure to pay principal and interest when due, covenant defaults (unless cured within

12

applicable grace periods, if any), events of bankruptcy and, for the amended Affinion Credit Facility, a material breach of representation or warranty and a change of control.

On October 5, 2010, Affinion Holdings issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes. Affinion Holdings used a portion of the proceeds of $320.3 million (net of issue discount), along with proceeds from a cash dividend from Affinion in the amount of $115.3 million, to repay its senior unsecured term loan. A portion of the remaining proceeds from the offering of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes were utilized to pay related fees and expenses of approximately $6.7 million, with the balance retained for general corporate purposes. The indenture governing Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes contains restrictive covenants related primarily to Affinion’s and Affinion Holdings’ ability to distribute dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. The outstanding Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes matured on November 15, 2015.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes for Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes. In connection with the exchange offer, $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes were exchanged for $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes. Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes bear interest at 13.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2014. At Affinion Holdings’ option (subject to certain exceptions), it may elect to pay interest (i) in cash, (ii) by increasing the principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes (“PIK Interest”), or (iii) 50% as cash and 50% as PIK Interest. PIK Interest accrues at 13.75% per annum plus 0.75%. Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes will mature on September 15, 2018. In June 2014, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for Affinion Holdings’ Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock.  In connection with the exchange offer, approximately $88.7 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes were exchanged for up to approximately 30.3 million Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock. As a result of the 2015 Consent Solicitations, substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions were removed from the indenture governing Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes and the collateral securing Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes was released.

Upon consummation of the 2015 Exchange Offers, 2015 Consent Solicitations and 2015 Rights Offering, Affinion Holdings effected a reclassification (the “Reclassification” and, together with the 2015 Exchange Offers, 2015 Consent Solicitations and 2015 Rights Offering and the related transactions, the “2015 Transactions”)  as follows.  Affinion Holdings’ existing Class A Common Stock (including Class A Common Stock issued as a result of a mandatory cashless exercise of all of its Series A Warrants) was converted into (i) shares of Affinion Holdings’ new Class C Common Stock (as defined below), that upon conversion will represent 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on a fully diluted basis, and (ii) shares of Affinion Holdings’ new Class D Common Stock (as defined below), that upon conversion will represent 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on a fully diluted basis. In addition, Affinion Holdings’ Series A Warrants and Affinion Holdings’ Class B Common Stock were eliminated from Affinion Holdings’ certificate of incorporation and Affinion Holdings’ Series B Warrants were cancelled for no additional consideration.

On March 31, 2017, Affinion entered into a commitment letter with a lender, pursuant to which the lender committed to provide term loans in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $1.3 billion and committed to provide revolving loans in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed $110.0 million, decreasing to $80.0 million on the first anniversary of the closing date (the “New Credit Facility”). Execution and closing of the New Credit Facility was conditioned on the consummation of the private offers to exchange for new Senior Cash 12.5%/ PIK Step-Up to 15.5% Notes due 2022 of Affinion (the “New Notes”) and New Warrants (as defined below) or repurchase for cash Affinion’s 2010 senior notes, Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes and Investments’ senior subordinated notes (the “Exchange Offers”). 

Also on March 31, 2017, certain holders of Existing Notes (the “Significant Holders”), which collectively held, as of such date, approximately  50% aggregate principal amount of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes, entered into a support agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with Affinion Holdings, Affinion and Affinion Investments. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, the Significant Holders agreed to tender in the Exchange Offers their Existing Notes.

Subsequent Event —

On May 10, 2017, Affinion entered into a new credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) having a five year maturity with a lender, pursuant to which the lender provided term loans in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $1.3 billion and committed to provide revolving loans in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed $110.0 million, decreasing to $80.0 million on the first anniversary of the closing date. The proceeds of the term loans were used by Affinion to refinance its existing senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Agreement Refinancing”) to redeem in full the International Notes (the “International Notes Redemption”), to pay transaction fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The term loans provide for quarterly amortization payments totaling (i) for the first two years after the closing date, 1% per annum, (ii) for the third year after the closing date, 2.5% per annum, and (iii) for each year thereafter, 5% per annum, in each case, payable quarterly, with the balance due upon the final maturity date, subject in each case, to reduction of such amortization payments for certain prepayments. The New

13

Credit Facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions .

The interest rates with respect to the term loans and revolving loans under the New Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (x) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.00%, in each case, plus 7.75%, or (y) the highest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, and (iii) 2.00% (“ABR”) in each case plus 6.75%.

Affinion’s obligations under the New Credit Facility are, and Affinion’s obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates are, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of Affinion’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The New Credit Facility is secured on a first-priority basis to the extent legally permissible by substantially all of the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all the Company’s capital stock and (ii) Affinion and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by Affinion or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of Affinion and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. The New Credit Facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in the New Credit Facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on Affinion’s (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to: declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase Affinion’s capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of Affinion’s subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of Affinion’s subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell assets; and enter into transactions with affiliates. The New Credit Facility requires Affinion to comply with (a) a maximum ratio of senior secured debt to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) and (y) a minimum ratio of EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges. For the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the maximum ratio of senior secured debt to EBITDA will be 7.5:1.0 and the minimum ratio of EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges will be 1.0:1.0.

On May 10, 2017, (a) Affinion completed a private offer to exchange or repurchase at the holder’s election (collectively, the “AGI Exchange Offer”) Affinion’s 2010 senior notes for (i) New Notes and warrants to acquire the Common Stock of Affinion Holdings (the “New Warrants”) or (ii) cash; (b) Affinion Holdings completed a private offer to exchange or repurchase at the holder’s election (collectively, the “Holdings Exchange Offer”) Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for (i) New Notes and New Warrants or (ii) cash; and (c) Affinion Investments completed a private offer to exchange or repurchase at the holder’s election (collectively, the “Investments Exchange Offer”) Investments’ senior subordinated notes for (i) New Notes and New Warrants or (ii) cash.  Under the terms of the AGI Exchange Offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes accepted in the AGI Exchange Offer, holders could elect to receive (i)(A) $1,000 principal amount of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 3.37 shares of Common Stock or (B) $930 in cash.   Under the terms of the Holdings Exchange Offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes accepted in the Holdings Exchange Offer, holders could elect to receive (i)(A) $1,000 principal amount of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 3.37 shares of Common Stock or (B) $700 in cash.   Under the terms of the Investments Exchange Offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Investments’ senior subordinated notes accepted in the Investments Exchange Offer, holders could elect to receive (i)(A) $1,000 principal amount of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 3.37 shares of Common Stock or (B) $880 in cash. Pursuant to the AGI Exchange Offer, approximately $269.7 million of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes were exchanged for approximately $277.8 million of New Notes, New Warrants to purchase 1,103,203 shares of Common Stock and approximately $417,386 in cash; pursuant to the Holdings Exchange Offer, approximately $4.6 million of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes were exchanged for approximately $4.7 million of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 18,539 shares of Common Stock; and pursuant to the Investments Exchange Offer, approximately $12.4 million of Investments’ senior subordinated notes were exchanged for approximately $12.8 million of New Notes, New Warrants to purchase 51,005 shares of Common Stock and approximately $912 in cash. Affinion used the proceeds of the New Notes issued pursuant to the Investor Purchase Agreement (as defined below) to pay the cash tender consideration to participating holders in the Exchange Offers.

Concurrently with the Exchange Offers, Affinion and Affinion Investments successfully solicited consents from holders to certain amendments to (a) the indenture governing Affinion’s 2010 senior notes to remove substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions and to reduce from 30 days to three business days the minimum notice period for optional redemptions, and (b) the indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes to reduce from 30 days to three business days the minimum notice period for optional redemptions.

The New Notes bear interest at the rate per annum as follows:

For any interest payment period ending on or prior to the date that is the 18 month anniversary of the settlement date of the Exchange Offers (the “Settlement Date”), Affinion may, at its option, elect to pay interest on the New Notes (1) entirely in cash (“Cash Interest”) at a rate per annum of 12.50% or (2) entirely by increasing the principal amount of the outstanding New Notes or by issuing PIK notes (“PIK Interest”) at a rate per annum of 14.00%, provided that interest for the first interest period commencing on the Settlement Date shall be payable entirely in PIK Interest.  

14

For any interest payment peri od ending after the date that is the 18 month anniversary of the Settlement Date, (i) if immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro forma basis, Affinion’s Senior Secured Leverage Ratio (as defined in the indenture governing the New Notes (the “New Notes Indenture”)) would be less than or equal to 4.375 to 1.000, Affinion’s Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the New Notes Indenture) would be greater than or equal to 1.375 to 1.000, in each case, as of the last da y of the most recently completed fiscal quarter of Affinion immediately preceding the scheduled interest payment date for which internal financial statements are available, and Affinion’s Average Liquidity (as defined in the New Notes Indenture) less the a mount of the anticipated cash interest payment is equal to or greater than $80.0 million as of the record date for such interest payment, then Affinion shall be required to pay interest on the New Notes for such interest period entirely in Cash Interest at a rate per annum of 12.50%, (ii) if immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro forma basis, Affinion’s Senior Secured Leverage Ratio would be less than or equal to 4.375 to 1.000, Affinion’s Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio would be greater than or equal to 1.250 to 1.000 but less than 1.375 to 1.000, in each case, as of the last day of the most recently completed fiscal quarter of Affinion immediately preceding the scheduled interest payment date for which internal financia l statements are available, and Affinion’s Average Liquidity less the amount of the anticipated cash interest payment is equal to or greater than $80.0 million as of the record date for such interest payment, then Affinion shall be required to pay interest on the New Notes for such interest period as a combination (“Combined Interest”) of Cash Interest at a rate per annum of 6.50% and PIK Interest at a rate per annum of 7.50% and (iii) if immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro fo rma basis, Affinion’s Senior Secured Leverage Ratio would be greater than 4.375 to 1.000, Affinion’s Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio would be less than 1.250 to 1.000, in each case, as of the last day of the most recently completed fiscal quarter of Affinion immediately preceding the scheduled interest payment date for which internal financial statements are available, or Affinion’s Average Liquidity less the amount of the anticipated cash interest payment is less than $80.0 million as of the recor d date for such interest payment, then Affinion may elect to pay interest on the New Notes for such interest period as PIK Interest at a rate per annum of: (x) 14.75% for any interest payment period ending on or prior to the date that is the 30 month anniv ersary of the Settlement Date and (y) 15.50% for any interest payment period ending after the date that is the 30 month anniversary of the Settlement Date ; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, if the aforementioned ratios are satisfied and require Affinion to either pay Cash Interest or Combined Interest for any interest period, as applicable, any restriction in the New Credit Facility on the payment of such interest shall not relieve Affinion of such obligation to pay Cash Interest or Combined Inte rest, as applicable, for such interest period and Affinion shall take all such actions as may be required in order to permit such payment of Cash Interest or Combined Interest, as applicable, for such interest period under the New Credit Facility (includin g, without limitation, any required repayment of outstanding borrowings under the revolving facility under the New Credit Facility).

Interest on the New Notes is payable semi-annually on May 10 and November 10 of each year, commencing on November 10, 2017. The New Notes will mature on November 10, 2022. Under certain circumstances, the New Notes are redeemable at Affinion’s option prior to maturity. If the New Notes are not so redeemed by Affinion, under certain circumstances, Affinion may be required to make an offer to purchase New Notes. The New Notes Indenture contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. In addition, the covenants will restrict Affinion Holdings’ ability to engage in certain businesses or business activities. Affinion will not be required to deliver any separate reports to holders or financial statements or other information of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries as long as Affinion Holdings is a guarantor of the New Notes and files such reports with the SEC. Affinion’s obligations under the New Notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by the same entities that guarantee the New Credit Facility.  The New Notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior obligations of Affinion and each of the guarantors and rank equally with all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, including obligations under the New Credit Facility, and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness.  

Previously, in connection with the Exchange Offers, on March 31, 2017, affiliates of Elliott Management Corporation (“Elliott”), Franklin Mutual Quest Fund, an affiliate of Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC (“Franklin”), affiliates of Empyrean Capital Partners, LP (“Empyrean”), and Metro SPV LLC, an affiliate of ICG Strategic Secondaries Advisors LLC (“ICG”) (collectively, in such capacity, the “Investors”) entered into an investor purchase agreement (the “Investor Purchase Agreement”) with Affinion Holdings, Affinion and Affinion Investments, in which they agreed to purchase New Notes in an aggregate principal amount sufficient to pay all holders that participate in the Exchange Offers and elect to receive cash. Further, pursuant to the Investor Purchase Agreement, if Affinion Holdings, Affinion or Affinion Investments exercised its option to redeem any of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes, Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes and/or Investments’ senior subordinated notes not tendered in the Exchange Offers, the Company could obligate the Investors to purchase an aggregate principal amount of New Notes and New Warrants that would yield sufficient cash proceeds to fund any such redemptions. On May 10, 2017, Affinion exercised its option to redeem the Existing AGI Notes and irrevocably deposited the cash redemption price on such date in order to satisfy and discharge its obligations under the indenture governing the Existing AGI Notes. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Investor Purchase Agreement, Affinion was required to pay to the Investors upon the closing of the Exchange Offers a commitment premium of $17.5 million in aggregate principal amount of New Notes and the same number of New Warrants that such principal amount of New Notes would have been issued with as part of the Exchange Offers.  

15

Accordingly, on May 10, 2017, Affinion issued approximately $ 5 32.6 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 3 , 974 , 581 shares of Common Stock, of which (i) approximately $ 295. 3 million principal amount  of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 1 , 172 , 747 shares of Common Stock were issue d to participating holders (including the Investors) in the Exchange Offers and (ii) approximately $ 2 37.3 million principal amount of New Notes and New Warrants to purchase 2, 801,834 shares of Common Stock were issued to the Investors pursuant to the Inve stor Purchase Agreement to fund the cash consideration payable in the Exchange Offers and the cash redemption price for the balance of the Existing AGI Notes that were not exchanged or tendered in the AGI Exchange Offer and to pay the commitment premium un der the Investor Purchase Agreement. The New Warrants received by the Investors on May 10, 2017, represented ap proximately 26.7 % of the pro forma fully diluted ownership of Affinion Holdings after giving effect to issuances pursuant to the Exchange Offers and the Investor Purchase Agreement, but without giving effect to options and restricted stock units granted under Affinion Holdings’ management compensation and incentive plans. The number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the New Warrants, as described herein, reflects the application of the anti-dilution protections of the New Warrants issued in the Exchange Offers and pursuant to the Investor Purchase Agreement (other than the New Warrants issued as part of the funding premium) t hat are triggered by the issuance of New Warrants as part of the funding premium .   

In connection with the Exchange Offers and the Investor Purchase Agreement, and in accordance with Affinion Holdings’ obligations under the Shareholders Agreement, due to the issuance of the New Warrants in the Exchange Offers and pursuant to the Investor Purchase Agreement, Affinion Holdings expects to offer (the “Pre-Emptive Rights Offer”) to each holder of pre-emptive rights (“Pre-Emptive Rights Holder”) the right to purchase with cash up to such Pre-Emptive Rights Holder’s pro rata share (as determined in accordance with the Shareholders Agreement)  of  New Warrants at an exercise price of $0.01 per New Warrant.

The Company is evaluating the accounting for these transactions, including treatment of the debt issuance costs, for which there will be significant charges that impact future periods, as with previous debt transactions.

Basic EPS attributable to holders of Common Stock is computed by dividing net income attributable to holders of Common Stock for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding. Diluted EPS attributable to holders of Common Stock reflects the potential dilution of Class C/D Common Stock, stock options, RSUs and incentive awards that could be exercised or converted into shares of Common Stock, and is computed by dividing net income attributable to holders of Common Stock for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding plus the potentially dilutive securities.

16

The computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is set forth below:

6. INCOME TAXES

The income tax provision is determined using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statements and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the income tax provision, while increases to the valuation allowance result in additional income tax provision. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable income. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its U.S. federal net deferred tax assets. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has also recorded valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign tax jurisdictions.

The Company’s effective income tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were 23.1% and 52.2%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is primarily a result of the increase in income before income taxes and non-controlling interest of $6.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $10.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and a decrease in the income tax provision from $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The Company’s tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income it earns in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax deductions impacting the effective tax rate, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company recognized less than $0.1 million of interest related to uncertain tax positions in each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The interest has been included in income tax expense for the current period. The Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2017 increased by less than $0.1 million as a result of tax positions taken during the current period, which was offset by a valuation allowance.

The Company’s income tax returns are periodically examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these and future examinations, certain tax authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service, may raise issues and impose additional assessments. The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of additional assessments resulting from these examinations and establishes liabilities, through the provision for income taxes, for potential amounts that may result therefrom. The recognition of uncertain tax benefits are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate or results of operations. Federal, state and local jurisdictions are subject to examination by the taxing authorities for all open years as prescribed by applicable statute. For significant foreign jurisdictions, tax years in Germany, France, Turkey, Switzerland and the United Kingdom remain open as prescribed by applicable statute. The Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months.

17

7 . COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in claims, governmental inquiries and legal proceedings related to employment matters, contract disputes, business practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. The Company is also a party to lawsuits which were brought against it and its affiliates and which purport to be a class action in nature and allege that the Company violated certain federal or state consumer protection statutes (as described below). The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against such lawsuits.

On June 17, 2010, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and Trilegiant Corporation (“Trilegiant”) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint asserts various causes of action on behalf of a putative nationwide class and a California-only subclass in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs, including claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the California Unfair Competition Law, the California False Advertising Law, and for unjust enrichment. On September 29, 2010, the Company filed a motion to compel arbitration of all of the claims asserted in this lawsuit. On February 24, 2011, the court denied the Company’s motion. On March 28, 2011, the Company and Trilegiant filed a notice of appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. On September 7, 2012, the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court denying arbitration. While that issue was on appeal, the matter proceeded in the district court. There was written discovery and depositions. Previously, the court had set a briefing schedule on class certification that called for the completion of class certification briefing on May 18, 2012. However, on March 28, 2012, the court suspended the briefing schedule on the motion due to the filing of two other overlapping class actions in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The first of those cases was filed on March 6, 2012, against the Company, Trilegiant, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corp., Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Apollo Global Management, LLC, 1-800-Flowers.Com, Inc., United Online, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Classmates Int’l, Inc., FTD Group, Inc., Days Inn Worldwide, Inc., Wyndham Worldwide Corp., People Finderspro, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Rakuten USA, Inc., IAC/InteractiveCorp., and Shoebuy.com, Inc. The second of those cases was filed on March 25, 2012, against the same defendants as well as Adaptive Marketing, LLC, Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co. These two cases assert similar claims as the claims asserted in the earlier-filed lawsuit in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs. On April 26, 2012, the court consolidated these three cases. The court also set an initial status conference for May 17, 2012. At that status conference, the court ordered that Plaintiffs file a consolidated amended complaint to combine the claims in the three previously separate lawsuits. The court also struck the class certification briefing schedule that had been set previously. On September 7, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint asserting substantially the same legal claims. The consolidated amended complaint added Priceline, Orbitz, Chase Paymentech, Hotwire, and TigerDirect as Defendants and added three new Plaintiffs; it also dropped Webloyalty and Rakuten as Defendants. On December 7, 2012, all Defendants filed motions seeking to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint and to strike certain portions of the complaint. Plaintiff’s response brief was filed on February 7, 2013, and Defendants’ reply briefs were filed on April 5, 2013. On September 25, 2013, the court held oral argument on the motions to dismiss. On March 28, 2014, the court ruled on the motions to dismiss, granting them in part and denying them in part. The court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ RICO claims and claims under the California Automatic Renewal Statute as to all defendants. The court also dismissed certain named Plaintiffs as their claims were barred either by the statute of limitations and/or a prior settlement agreement. Certain Defendants were also dismissed from the case. The court also struck certain allegations from the consolidated amended complaint, including certain of Plaintiffs’ class action allegations under CUTPA. As to the Company and Trilegiant, the court denied the motion to dismiss certain Plaintiffs’ claims under ECPA and for unjust enrichment, as well as certain other claims of Plaintiffs under CUTPA.

Also, on December 5, 2012, the Plaintiffs’ law firms in these consolidated cases filed an additional action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. That case is identical in all respects to this case except that it was filed by a new Plaintiff (the named Plaintiff from the class action complaint previously filed against the Company, Trilegiant, 1-800-Flowers.com, and Chase Bank USA, N.A., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on November 10, 2010). On January 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to consolidate that case into the existing set of consolidated cases. On June 13, 2013, the court entered an order staying the date for all Defendants to respond to the Complaint until 21 days after the court ruled on the motion to consolidate. On March 28, 2014, the court entered an order granting the motion to consolidate.

On May 12, 2014, remaining Defendants in the consolidated cases filed answers in which they denied the material allegations of the consolidated amended complaint. On April 28, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking interlocutory appellate review of portions of the court’s order of March 28, 2014. Briefing on the motion was completed on June 5, 2014. On March 26, 2015, the court denied Plaintiff’s motion for interlocutory appeal. On May 29, 2015, the court issued a scheduling order indicating that discovery was to commence immediately and be completed by December 31, 2015. On May 29, 2015, the court also set deadlines for dispositive motions, which were due February 29, 2016. If no dispositive motions were filed, a joint trial memorandum would be due by April 1, 2016, and jury selection would take place on May 3, 2016. If dispositive motions were filed, the joint trial memorandum would be due by October 3, 2016, and jury selection would take place on November 1, 2016. On June 16, 2015, the court set a schedule for class certification, with Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification due on September 15, 2015, and with briefing to be completed by

18

November 30, 2015. Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on September 15, 2015, and Defendants filed an opposition brief on December 15, 2015. Plai ntiffs filed a reply brief on December 22, 2015, and Defendants filed a sur-reply on December 29, 2015. On February 29, 2016, the Company filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the individual claims of the remaining named Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs filed a res ponse on March 21, 2016, and the Company filed its response on April 4, 2016. On August 23, 2016 the court granted Defendant’s motion for Summary Judgment as to all remaining claims against the Defendants.   Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on September 21, 2016.  The Plaintiffs filed their opening brief on appeal on January 4, 2017. The Company filed its response brief on April 5, 2017.

On August 27, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against Webloyalty, one of its former clients and one of the credit card associations in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging, among other things, violations of the EFT, ECPA, unjust enrichment, civil theft, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and CUTPA violation (the “Connecticut Action”). This lawsuit relates to Webloyalty’s alleged conduct occurring on and after October 1, 2008. On November 1, 2010, the Defendants moved to dismiss the initial complaint, which Plaintiff then amended on November 19, 2010. On December 23, 2010, Webloyalty filed a second motion to dismiss this lawsuit. On May 15, 2014, the court heard oral argument on Plaintiff’s motion to strike the Company’s request for judicial notice of the Plaintiff’s membership enrollment documents filed in support of the Company’s second motion to dismiss. On July 17, 2014, the court denied Plaintiff’s motion to strike.  The court, at the same time, dismissed those claims grounded in fraud, but reserved until further proceedings the determination as to whether all of Plaintiff’s claims are grounded in fraud and whether those claims not grounded in fraud are dismissible.  The court permitted the Plaintiff until August 15, 2014 to amend his complaint and allowed the parties the opportunity to conduct limited discovery, to be completed by September 26, 2014, concerning the issues addressed in its dismissal order. All other discovery was stayed in the case. The July 17, 2014 order indicated that the court would set a further motion to dismiss briefing schedule following the conclusion of this limited discovery. The Plaintiff amended his complaint as scheduled, and the parties conducted limited discovery as ordered. After this limited discovery, the parties proposed a motion to dismiss briefing schedule calling for the Defendants to file their opening briefs on January 9, 2015. The Plaintiff filed his opposition brief on March 24, 2015, and on April 24, 2015, the Defendants filed their reply briefs in response to that opposition. On October 15, 2015, the court entered a judgment dismissing all of the Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice and without further leave to amend. On November 13, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the dismissal decision. Plaintiff’s opening appeals brief was filed on February 10, 2016. The Company’s answering brief was filed on April 15, 2016 and the Plaintiff filed a reply brief on May 11, 2016. The court held oral argument on September 14, 2016. On December 20, 2016, the Court affirmed the District Court’s dismissal decisions, with the exception of Plaintiff’s claim under CUTPA and under the EFT with regard to delivery of a “copy” of the Plaintiff’s authorization to him. The Court vacated the District Court’s decision on both claims and remanded them to the District Court for further proceedings on the merits. On March 23, 2017, the District Court held a scheduling conference and took the parties’ respective recommendations for the remaining case schedule under advisement.

On June 7, 2012, another class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California against Webloyalty that was factually similar to the Connecticut Action. The action claims that Webloyalty engaged in unlawful business practices in violation of California Business and Professional Code § 17200, et seq. and in violation of CUTPA. Both claims are based on allegations that in connection with enrollment and billing of the Plaintiff, Webloyalty charged Plaintiff’s credit or debit card using information obtained through a data pass process and without obtaining directly from Plaintiff his full account number, name, address, and contact information, as purportedly required under the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act. On September 25, 2012, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety and the court scheduled a hearing on the motion for January 14, 2013. Webloyalty also sought judicial notice of the enrollment page and related enrollment and account documents. Plaintiff filed his opposition on December 12, 2012, and Webloyalty filed its reply submission on January 7, 2013. Thereafter, on January 10, 2013, the court cancelled the previously scheduled January 14, 2013 hearing and indicated that it would rule based on the parties’ written submissions without the need for a hearing. On August 28, 2013, the court sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice with leave to amend by September 30, 2013. The Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on September 30, 2013, adding purported claims under the ECPA and for unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion, civil theft, and invasion of privacy. On December 2, 2013, the Company moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff responded to the motion on January 27, 2014. On February 6, 2014, the court indicated that it would review the submissions and issue a decision on Plaintiff’s motion without oral argument. On September 29, 2014, the court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claims on substantive grounds and/or statute of limitations grounds. The court allowed the Plaintiff 28 days to file a motion demonstrating why a further amendment of the complaint was not futile. On October 27, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint and attached a proposed amended complaint. The Company responded to the motion on November 10, 2014. On June 22, 2015, the court entered a final order and judgment denying Plaintiff’s motion to amend, dismissing all federal claims with prejudice, and dismissing all state claims without prejudice.  On July 10, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice appealing the dismissal decision and denial of his request to further amend his complaint to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Company responded to the motion on November 10, 2014. On June 22, 2015, the court entered a final order and judgment denying Plaintiff’s motion to amend, dismissing all federal claims with prejudice, and dismissing all state claims without prejudice. On July 10, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice appealing the dismissal decision and denial of his request to further amend his complaint to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Plaintiff filed his opening appeal brief on November 19, 2015, and the Company’s answering brief was filed on January 19, 2016. Plaintiff filed a reply brief on February 2, 2016. A hearing on the appeal was held on February 17, 2017. On March 28, 2017, the Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff’s current complaint had stated claims, which remain as of yet unproven, sufficiently to permit him to proceed with the

19

litigati on.  Specifically, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s procedural dismissal of the Plaintiff’s various federal and state causes of action, with the exception of dismissal of his ECPA claim and privacy-based state law claims, which the Court of Appeals affirmed . The Court of Appeals also vacated the District Court’s order denying the Plaintiff leave to amend, thereby allowing the Plaintiff to reassert his claims under the EFT, which had previously been dismissed.

On May 11, 2016, Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. (“Kohl’s”) filed a third-party complaint against Trilegiant in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging claims for indemnification, contribution and breach of contract. The third-party complaint arises in a case filed in the same court on February 13, 2015, in which a putative class action has been brought against Kohl’s and the issuer of Kohl’s credit cards alleging breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment. Kohl’s third-party complaint alleges that Trilegiant breached alleged obligations to Kohl’s under a marketing agreement between Trilegiant and Kohl’s through which a Trilegiant membership program was offered to Kohl’s credit card customers, including Trilegiant’s purported obligation under that agreement to indemnify Kohl’s and participate in its defense of the class action. Kohl’s third-party complaint seeks damages from Trilegiant, including amounts for which Kohl’s may be liable to the named plaintiffs or the putative class in the class action relating to their claims pertaining to Trilegiant’s membership program and Kohl’s costs, including attorney fees, of defending against such claims. On July 5, 2016, Trilegiant filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay Kohl’s third-party complaint. On September 2, 2016, Kohl’s filed an opposition to Trilegiant’s motion to dismiss. On February 3, 2017, Trilegiant filed a reply to Kohl’s opposition. As of March 1, 2017, the parties entered into a settlement and release wherein Trilegiant agreed to make a payment to Kohl’s of approximately $0.3 million and to pay 30% of Kohl’s on-going legal fees in the putative class action, capped at $0.4 million (excluding Trilegiant’s initial payment of approximately $0.3 million), to resolve Kohl’s indemnification, contribution and breach of contract claims against Trilegiant with respect to fees and expenses that Kohl’s has incurred or will incur in connection with its defense of the putative class action. Kohl’s reserved its right to seek indemnity from Trilegiant for any liability Kohl’s may incur to the plaintiffs in the putative class action relating to Trilegiant’s membership program. The third-party complaint was dismissed without prejudice by stipulation of the parties on March 10, 2017.

On August 18, 2016, Lion Receivables 2004 Trust (“Lion”) served Long Term Preferred Care, Inc. (“LTPC”), a subsidiary of Affinion Benefits Group, LLC, with a complaint (the “Lion Litigation”), which was filed in the United States District Court for the State of Delaware. LTPC filed a motion to dismiss in response to the complaint on October 24, 2016. On March 20, 2017, a magistrate judge recommended that the Court deny LTPC’s motion to dismiss. LTPC has filed objections to this recommendation, and the Court has not indicated when it will make a final decision on the motion to dismiss. In the complaint, Lion alleges that LTPC made certain inaccurate representations and warranties in the Commission Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 30, 2004, between LTPC and Lion. Lion seeks compensatory damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to our purchase agreement with Cendant, the Cendant Entities (as such terms are defined in Note 9 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements) have agreed to indemnify us for any liability relating to this matter.

Other Contingencies

From time to time, the Company receives inquiries from federal and state agencies which may include the FTC, the FCC, the CFPB, state attorneys general and other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings. Additionally, certain of our clients have become, and others may become, involved in legal proceedings or governmental inquiries relating to our programs and solutions or marketing practices. As a result, we may be subject to claims under our marketing agreements, and we have accrued $8.2 million for certain asserted claims, including claims for which no litigation has been commenced.

From time to time, our international operations also receive inquiries from consumer protection, insurance or data protection agencies. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings. On January 27, 2015, following voluntary discussions with the FCA, AIL, one of our UK subsidiaries, and 11 UK retail banks and credit card issuers, announced a proposed joint arrangement, which allows eligible consumers to make claims for compensation in relation to a discontinued benefit in one of AIL’s products. The proposed arrangement has been approved by a majority of those affected consumers who voted at a creditors’ meeting held on June 30, 2015, and has also been approved by the High Court in London at a hearing held on July 9, 2015. The proposed arrangement, which will not result in the imposition of any fines on AIL or the Company, became effective on August 17, 2015 and eligible customers had until March 18, 2016 to claim compensation (in exceptional circumstances, they had until September 18, 2016). As of December 31, 2016, substantially all of the compensation to consumers had been paid and, based on the information currently available, the Company has recorded an estimated liability that represents any additional potential consumers’ refunds to be paid by the Company as part of such arrangement.

On November 30, 2015, PNC Bank, N.A. (“PNC”) filed a pleading called a Praecipe for Writ of Summons (the “Writ”) in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, naming as defendants Trilegiant Corporation, Affinion Benefits Group, LLC, Affinion, and/or Affinion Holdings. The parties participated in a non-binding mediation on September 13, 2016. The parties were unable to resolve their dispute in the mediation. On November 18, 2016, PNC filed a complaint in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas against Trilegiant for indemnification, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The complaint also alleges negligence and intentional misconduct by other Affinion entities. These claims arise

20

out of consent orders that PNC entered into with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) to settle the OCC’s Section 5 claim against it. According to PNC, the damages it incurred pursuant to those consent orders were the result of Trilegiant’s failure to properly service PNC’s customers. Trilegiant’s preliminary objections to PNC’s complaint were filed on January 12, 2017 and ar e now fully briefed. On January 30, 2017, the case was transferred from the Court of Common Pleas to the Commerce Court and Complex Litigation Center. Oral argument on Trilegiant’s preliminary objections was held on May 9, 2017.

On August 5, 2016, Citizens Bank, N.A. (“Citizens”) filed a complaint against Affinion Holdings, Affinion, Trilegiant, and Affinion Group, LLC (collectively, the “Defendants”)  in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island.  In the complaint, Citizens asserts various causes of action and requests for monetary relief, including a demand for contractual indemnification for customer refunds and attorneys’ fees that Citizens incurred related to a consent order entered into by Citizens with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on November 10, 2015 with respect to certain identity theft protection products offered to Citizens’ customers. On November 18, 2016, Defendants’ filed a motion to dismiss in response to the complaint. On February 6, 2017, the Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dispositive motions are due by December 6, 2017.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, a charge of $5.2 million was recorded relating to the remediation of an external gift card inventory theft. An insurance claim related to the theft is currently being pursued with our carriers and we expect a recovery in a future period which will be recorded when received.  

The Company believes that the amount accrued for the above litigation and contingencies matters is adequate, and the reasonably possible loss beyond the amounts accrued will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, based on information currently available. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company believes that accruals are adequate and it intends to vigorously defend itself against such matters, unfavorable resolution could occur, which could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole.

Surety Bonds and Letters of Credit

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is required to provide surety bonds to various state authorities in order to operate its membership, insurance and travel agency programs. As of March 31, 2017, the Company provided guarantees for surety bonds totaling approximately $10.8 million and issued letters of credit totaling $12.1 million.

8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On October 17, 2005, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The Board was authorized to grant up to 4.9 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As discussed below, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Plan on or after November 7, 2007, the effective date of the 2007 Plan (as defined below). As discussed below, on November 9, 2015, the effective date of the Reclassification (as defined below), existing option awards under the 2005 Plan were adjusted in accordance with their terms. Generally, existing options for Class A Common Stock (as defined below) under the 2005 Plan have been converted into options for shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class C Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class C Common Stock”), and Affinion Holdings’ Class D Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class D Common Stock” and, together with the Class C Common Stock, the “Class C/D Common Stock”), and both the exercise price and the number of shares of Class C Common Stock and Class D Common Stock underlying such options have been adjusted.

In November 2007, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2007 Stock Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The Board was authorized to grant up to 10.0 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2007 Plan over a ten year period. As discussed below, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2007 Plan on or after November 9, 2015, the effective date of the Reclassification, as defined below, and all outstanding options granted under the 2007 Plan were cancelled for no consideration, effective November 9, 2015.

In connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty in January 2011, the Company assumed the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty 2005 Plan”). In connection with the Reclassification, as defined below, all outstanding options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were cancelled for no consideration, effective November 9, 2015.

21

On November 9, 2015, in conjunction with the 2015 Exchange Offers, the 2015 Consent Solicitations and the 2015 Rights Offering, Affinion Holdings effected the Reclassification as follows. Immediately prior to the Reclassification, Affinion Holdings’ Series A Warrants (the “Series A Warrants”) were mandatorily cashlessly exercised for shar es of Affinion Holdings’ then existing Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), and Affinion Holdings’ Series B Warrants (the “Series B Warrants”) were cancelled for no additional consideration. In addition, all issued and outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan and the 2007 Plan were cancelled for no additional consideration. Stock options issued and outstanding under the 2005 Plan were not affected by the cancellation. In accordance with the Reclassification , Affinion Holdings’ Class A Common Stock was converted into shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class C/D Common Stock. Issued and outstanding options under the 2005 Plan were converted into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class C Common Stock an d shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class D Common Stock. The number of shares of Class C/D Common Stock subject to the issued and outstanding options was adjusted based on the conversion ratio utilized for the conversion of the Class A Common Stock, and the ex ercise price was correspondingly adjusted.  As of March 31, 2017, there were outstanding options to acquire approximately 2,235 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class C Common Stock and approximately 2,353 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class D Common Stock. The weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options, all of which were vested at March 31, 2017, is $147.12 and the issued and outstanding options granted to employees and to directors each have a weighted average contractual life of 7.0 years.

On November 9, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and other equity-based awards. Under the 2015 Plan, 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance pursuant to awards. On March 9, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded 859,500 options to employees under the 2015 Plan, and subsequently issued another 28,000 options to employees under the 2015 Plan. As of March 31, 2017, there were 868,950 options outstanding.

For employee stock awards, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for awards with only a service condition and have a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Stock Options

During the three months ended March  31, 2017 and 2016, there were no stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan. All options previously granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan are comprised of three tranches with the following terms:

On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 1.9 million of the outstanding options under the 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no stock options granted to employees from the 2007 Plan. All options granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The stock options granted to employees from the 2007 Plan have the following terms:

On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 2.4 million of the outstanding options under the 2007 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024. On November 9, 2015, in conjunction with the Reclassification, all issued and outstanding options under the 2007 Plan were cancelled for no additional consideration.

22

D uring the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no stock options granted to members of the Board of Directors from the 2007 Plan. Generally, options granted to members of the Board of Directors fully vest on the date of grant and have an initial option term of 10 years. On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 0.2 million of the outstanding options granted to members of the Board of Directors, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the co ntractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024. On November 9, 2015, in conjunction with the Reclassification, all issued and outstanding options granted to members of the Board of Directors under the 2007 Plan were cancelled for no additional consideration.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Compensation Committee granted options to employees under the 2015 Plan to purchase 0.9 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ Common Stock. There were no options granted to employees under the 2015 Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The options have a contractual life of 10 years and vest ratably on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The exercise price of the options is $13.97 per share, the grant date fair value of a share of Affinion Holdings’ Common Stock.

The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of comparable companies.

The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding, and is based on the average of the requisite service period and the contractual term of the option.

A summary of option activity for options to acquire shares of Class C/D Common Stock under the 2005 Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2017 is presented below (number of options in thousands):

23

A summary of option activity for options to acquire shares of Common Stock granted under the 2015 Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2017 is presented below (number of options in thousands):

Based on the estimated fair values of options granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 totaled $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, there was $6.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years.

Restricted Stock Units

On March 25, 2016, each of the non-employee members of the Board of Directors was granted RSUs under the 2015 Plan as a component of their annual compensation. The RSUs vested 3/12 ^ths as of the date of grant and an additional 1/12 ^th vested on March 31, 2016 and 1/12 ^th will vest on the last day of the next eight months, subject to the director’s continuing service on each vesting date. Subject to vesting, the RSUs granted to the non-employee directors will be settled in shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock on the earlier to occur of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2015 Plan) and the third anniversary of the date of grant. In connection with the resignation of one of the directors, the RSUs awarded to the resigning director immediately vested. The RSUs granted to the remaining directors vested in 2016. As these awards will be settled in shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, the Company has accounted for these RSUs as an equity award.

Based on the estimated fair value of the RSUs granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $0.1 million. There was no stock-based compensation expense related to the RSU awards for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Incentive Awards

On March 16, 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved the terms of (i) the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2015 Retention Award Program (the “2015 Retention Program”), an equity and cash incentive award program intended to foster retention of key employees of Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries, and (ii) the awards (the “Retention Awards”) to each such key employee consisting of retention units (“RUs”) and a cash retention award (“CRA”) to be made by Affinion Holdings under the 2015 Retention Program. Each Retention Award will entitle the employee to one share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock for each RU and a cash payment in respect of the CRA, in each case, subject to applicable withholding taxes, when the applicable vesting conditions for the Retention Awards are met. The Retention Awards are subject to time-based vesting conditions. Upon termination of employment for any reason, an employee will forfeit the entire unvested portion of his or her Retention Award. In conjunction with the Reclassification, which was effective on November 9, 2015, Retention Awards under the 2015 Retention Program that called for vesting of Class A Common Stock will vest in an adjusted number of shares of Class C Common Stock and Class D Common Stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 6,466 shares of Class C Common Stock and 6,809 shares of Class D Common Stock vested, in addition to CRAs of approximately $2.0 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, 5,904 shares of Class C Common Stock and 6,209 shares of Class D Common Stock vested, in addition to CRAs of approximately $1.8 million During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized expense related to the 2015 Retention Program of $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of which $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related to the common stock portion of the Retention Awards.

24

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Post-Closing Relationships with Cendant

On October 17, 2005, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the sale of the Cendant Marketing Services Division to the Company and an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”), pursuant to a purchase agreement dated July 26, 2005 for approximately $1.8 billion (the “Apollo Transactions”).

All references to Cendant refer to Cendant Corporation, which changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in August 2006, and its consolidated subsidiaries, specifically in the context of its business and operations prior to, and in connection with, the Company’s separation from Cendant. In connection with the Apollo Transactions, Cendant has agreed to indemnify the Company, Affinion and the Company’s affiliates (collectively the “indemnified parties”) for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made by Cendant, as well as for other specified matters, certain of which are described below. Affinion and the Company have agreed to indemnify Cendant for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made in the purchase agreement, as well as for certain other specified matters. Generally, all parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to breaches of representations and warranties (except with respect to the matters described below) (i) are subject to a $0.1 million occurrence threshold, (ii) are not effective until the aggregate amount of losses suffered by the indemnified party exceeds $15.0 million (and then only for the amount of losses exceeding $15.0 million), and (iii) are limited to $275.1 million of recovery. Generally, subject to certain exceptions of greater duration, the parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to representations and warranties survived until April 15, 2007 with indemnification obligations related to covenants surviving until the applicable covenant has been fully performed.

In connection with the purchase agreement, Cendant agreed to specific indemnification obligations with respect to the matters described below.

Excluded Litigation . Cendant has agreed to fully indemnify the indemnified parties with respect to any pending or future litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to accounting irregularities in the former CUC International, Inc. announced on April 15, 1998. Of the legal proceedings disclosed in Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the Lion Litigation is a matter that involves the Cendant Entities (as defined below) agreeing to indemnify us for any related liabilities.

Certain Litigation and Compliance with Law Matters . Cendant has agreed to indemnify the indemnified parties up to specified amounts for: (a) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to legal proceedings that (1) occur after the date of the purchase agreement, (2) relate to facts and circumstances related to the business of Affinion Group, LLC or Affinion International Holdings Limited (“Affinion International”), and (3) constitute a breach or violation of its compliance with law representations and warranties and (b) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to compliance with laws to the extent related to the business of Affinion Group, LLC or Affinion International.

Cendant, Affinion and the Company have agreed that losses up to $15.0 million incurred with respect to these matters will be borne solely by the Company and losses in excess of $15.0 million will be shared by the parties in accordance with agreed upon allocations. The Company has the right at all times to control litigation related to shared losses and Cendant has consultation rights with respect to such litigation.

Prior to 2009, Cendant (i) distributed the equity interests it previously held in its hospitality services business (“Wyndham”) and its real estate services business (“Realogy”) to Cendant stockholders and (ii) sold its travel services business (“Travelport”) to a third party. Cendant continues as a re-named publicly traded company which owns the vehicle rental business (“Avis Budget,” together with Wyndham and Realogy, the “Cendant Entities”). Subject to certain exceptions, Wyndham and Realogy have agreed to share Cendant’s contingent and other liabilities (including its indemnity obligations to the Company described above and other liabilities to the Company in connection with the Apollo Transactions) in specified percentages. If any Cendant Entity defaults in its payment, when due, of any such liabilities, the remaining Cendant Entities are required to pay an equal portion of the amounts in default.

25

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

On a limited basis the Company has entered into 30 day foreign currency forward contracts, and upon expiration of the contracts, entered into successive 30 day foreign currency forward contracts. The contracts have been entered into to mitigate the Company’s foreign currency exposures related to intercompany loans which are not expected to be repaid within the next twelve months and that are denominated in Euros and British pounds. At March 31, 2017, the Company had in place contracts to sell EUR 10.0 million and receive $10.8 million and to sell GBP 13.9 million and receive $17.2 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized a realized loss on the forward contracts of $0.6 million and a realized gain on the forward contracts of $0.5 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had an immaterial unrealized loss on the foreign currency forward contracts.

Credit Risk and Exposure

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers, prepaid commissions and interest rate swaps. The Company manages such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are from various marketing, insurance and business partners and the Company maintains an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

Fair Value

The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments as follows:

Current accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting

26

entity’s own assumptions about market participant a ssumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, giving the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. Level 1 inputs to a fair value measurement are quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

There were no financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, other than foreign currency forward contracts. Such contracts have historically had a term of approximately thirty days and have been held to maturity. The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is measured based on significant observable inputs (Level 2).

11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Management evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable segments based upon several factors, of which the primary factors are revenue and “Segment EBITDA,” which the Company defines as income from operations before depreciation and amortization. The presentation of Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. The segment information discussed below reflects our new operating segments in effect as of January 1, 2016, as discussed in Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Segment EBITDA of the Company’s four reportable segments does not include general corporate expenses. Corporate expenses include certain departmental service costs such as human resources, legal, corporate finance and accounting and unallocated portions of information technology, in addition to expenses previously recorded in corporate such as professional fees related to debt financing activities and stock compensation costs. General corporate expenses have been excluded from the presentation of the Segment EBITDA for the Company’s four reportable segments because they are not reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources among operating segments or assessing operating segment performance. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.