The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented herein have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements at the dates and for the periods indicated as required by Rule 10-01 of Regulation S‑X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the respective full years. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on June 12, 2017.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tidewater Inc. and its subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The company uses the equity method to account for equity investments over which the company exercises significant influence but does not exercise control and is not the primary beneficiary. Unless otherwise specified, all per share information included in this document is on a diluted earnings per share basis.

As previously reported, on July 17, 2017, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) issued its written order confirming the company’s consensual prepackaged Plan of Reorganization that had been filed with the Bankruptcy Court on May 17, 2017 (the “Petition Date”) in connection with the filing by the company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) of a petition with the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On July 31, 2017, the company and its affiliated Chapter 11 Debtors emerged from bankruptcy after successfully completing its reorganization pursuant to the Second Amended Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Tidewater and its Affiliated Debtors (the “Plan”), that was confirmed on July 17, 2017 by the Bankruptcy Court. Refer to Note (2) for further details on the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy and emergence.

Upon emergence from the chapter 11 bankruptcy, the company adopted fresh-start accounting in accordance with provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) No. 852, "Reorganizations" (ASC 852), which resulted in the company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes on July 31, 2017 (the “Effective Date”). Upon the adoption of fresh-start accounting, the company's assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values as of July 31, 2017. As a result of the adoption of fresh-start accounting, the company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements subsequent to July 31, 2017 are not comparable to its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on and prior to July 31, 2017. Refer to Note 3, "Fresh-start Accounting," for further details on the impact of fresh-start accounting on the company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

References to "Successor" or "Successor Company" relate to the financial position and results of operations of the reorganized company subsequent to July 31, 2017. References to "Predecessor" or "Predecessor Company" relate to the financial position and results of operations of the company through July 31, 2017.

The company made certain reclassifications to predecessor amounts to conform to the successor presentation related to a modification to the company’s reportable segments (refer to Note 14). These reclassifications did not have a material effect on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings, balance sheets or cash flows.

Concurrent with emergence from the Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Successor Company adopted a new policy for the recognition of the costs of planned major maintenance activities incurred to ensure compliance with applicable regulations and maintain certifications for vessels with classification societies. These costs include drydocking and survey costs necessary to maintain certifications and generally occur twice in every five year period. These recertification costs are typically incurred while the vessel is in drydock and may be concurrent with other vessel maintenance and improvement activities. Costs related to the recertification of vessels are deferred and amortized over 30 months on a straight-line basis. Maintenance costs incurred at the time of the recertification drydocking which are not related to the recertification of the vessel are expensed as incurred. Costs related to vessel improvements which either extend the vessel’s useful life or increase the vessels functionality are capitalized and depreciated. The company’s previous policy (Predecessor) was to expense vessel recertification costs in the period incurred.

Upon emergence from the Chapter 11 bankruptcy the Successor Company, to better reflect the current offshore supply vessel market, changed the estimated useful lives for vessels having 25 year useful lives to 20 years. Additionally, assumed salvage values for vessels at the end of such vessels’ estimated useful life were changed from 10% of original cost at year 25 to not more than 7.5% of original cost at year 20.

9

(2) CHAPTER 11 PROCEEDINGS AND EMERGENCE

During the bankruptcy proceedings from the Petition Date to the Effective Date, the Debtors operated as "debtors-in-possession" in accordance with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The company operated in the ordinary course of business pursuant to motions filed by the Debtors and granted by the Bankruptcy Court.

Upon emergence of the company from bankruptcy:

10

As of the Effective Date, the company and the Sale Leaseback Parties had not reached agreement with respect to the amount of the Sale Leaseback Claims. Accordingly, on the Effective Date, a portion of the above consideration in cash, New Creditor Warrants, and New Secured Notes in an amount that the company believes represents the maximum possible distributions owing on account of the Sale Leaseback Claims was withheld from the cash, New Creditor Warrants and New Secured Notes distributed to holders of allowed General Unsecured Claims on account of such disputed Sale Leaseback Claims until they are resolved. To the extent the Sale Leaseback Claims were resolved for less than the amount withheld, the remainder was distributed to holders of allowed General Unsecured Claims pro rata. Included in liabilities subject to compromise as of July 31, 2017 (Predecessor) is $260.2 million related to the claims of the Sale Leaseback Parties. As of September 30, 2017 (Successor), five claims had been settled for an aggregate $166.1 million and one claim, which had been reserved for at a maximum amount of $94.1 million, remained outstanding.

Upon the company's emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the company qualified for and adopted fresh-start accounting in accordance with the provisions set forth in ASC 852 as (i) holders of existing shares of the Predecessor immediately before the Plan Effective Date received less than 50 percent of the voting shares of the Successor entity and (ii) the reorganization value of the Successor was less than its post-petition liabilities and estimated allowed claims immediately before the Plan Effective Date.

Refer to Note 2, "Chapter 11 Proceedings and Emergence" for the terms of the Plan. Fresh-start accounting requires the company to present its assets, liabilities, and equity as if it were a new entity upon emergence from bankruptcy. The new entity is referred to as "Successor”. The implementation of the Plan and the application of fresh-start accounting materially changed the carrying amounts and classifications reported in the company’s consolidated financial statements and resulted in the company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes.  As a result of the application of fresh-start accounting and the effects of the implementation of the Plan, the financial statements after July 31, 2017 are not comparable with the financial statements prior to July 31, 2017. Therefore, "black-line" financial statements are presented to distinguish between the Predecessor and Successor companies.

As part of fresh-start accounting, the company was required to determine the Reorganization Value of the Successor upon emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings. Reorganization Value approximates the fair value of the entity, before considering liabilities, and approximates the amount a willing buyer would pay for the assets of the entity immediately after the restructuring. The fair values of the Successor’s assets were determined with the assistance of a third party valuation expert. The Reorganization Value was allocated to the company's individual assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values.

E nterprise value, which is the basis for deriving Reorganization Value, represents the estimated fair value of an entity’s capital structure which generally consists of long term debt and shareholders’ equity. The Successor’s enterprise value was $1.050 billion, which is the mid-point of the range included in the disclosure statement of the Plan of $850 million to $1.250 billion. This enterprise value was the basis for deriving equity value of $1.055 billion, which is within the range of $743 million to $1.143 billion also included in the disclosure statement of the Plan. Fair values are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies beyond the company’s control. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimates, assumptions, valuations, appraisals and financial projections will be realized, and actual results could vary materially. Moreover, the market value of the company’s common stock subsequent to its emergence from bankruptcy may differ materially from the equity valuation derived for accounting purposes.

11

For purposes of estimating the fair value of the company's vessels the company used a combination of the discounted cash flow method (income approach) using a weighted average cost of capital of 12%, the guideline public com pany method (market approach) and vessel specific liquidation value analyses.  In estimating the fair value of the other property and equipment, the company used a combination of asset, income, and market-based approaches.

See further discussion below in the "Fresh-start accounting adjustments" for the specific assumptions used in the valuation of the company's various other assets and liabilities.

Although the company believes the assumptions and estimates used to develop Enterprise Value and Reorganization Value are reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact the analysis and resulting conclusions. The assumptions used in estimating these values are inherently uncertain and require judgment.

The following table reconciles the company’s Enterprise Value to the estimated fair value of the Successor’s common stock as of July 31, 2017:

The following table reconciles the company’s Enterprise Value to its Reorganization Value as of July 31, 2017:

12

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

The following presents the effects on the company's unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet due to the reorganization and fresh-start accounting adjustments. The explanatory notes following the table below provide further details on the adjustments, including the company's assumptions and methods used to determine fair value for its assets and liabilities.