Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Overview

Golden Entertainment, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) own and operate a diversified entertainment platform, consisting of a portfolio of gaming assets that focus on resort casino operations and distributed gaming (including tavern gaming in the Company’s wholly-owned taverns). The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market, and the Company’s ticker symbol is “GDEN.”

The Company conducts its business through two reportable operating segments: Casinos and Distributed Gaming.

The Company’s Casinos segment involves the operation of eight resort casino properties in Nevada and Maryland, comprising the Stratosphere Casino, Hotel & Tower (the “Stratosphere”), Arizona Charlie’s Decatur and Arizona Charlie’s Boulder in Las Vegas, Nevada, the Aquarius Casino Resort (the “Aquarius”) in Laughlin, Nevada, the Pahrump Nugget Hotel Casino (“Pahrump Nugget”), Gold Town Casino and Lakeside Casino & RV Park in Pahrump, Nevada, and the Rocky Gap Casino Resort in Flintstone, Maryland (“Rocky Gap”). The casino properties in Las Vegas and Laughlin, Nevada were added to the Company’s casino portfolio in October 2017 as a result of the Company’s acquisition of American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC (“American”), as further described below.

The Company’s Distributed Gaming segment involves the installation, maintenance and operation of slots and amusement devices in non-casino locations (such as grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, bars, taverns and liquor stores) in Nevada and Montana, and the operation of wholly-owned branded taverns targeting local patrons located primarily in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area.

On October 20, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding equity interests of American (the “American Acquisition”). The results of operations of American and its subsidiaries have been included in the Company’s results subsequent to that date. See Note 3, Acquisition , for information regarding the American Acquisition.

In January 2018, the Company completed an underwritten public offering pursuant to its universal shelf registration statement, in which certain of the Company’s shareholders resold an aggregate of 6.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock, and the Company sold 975,000 newly issued shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise in full of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase additional shares. The Company’s net proceeds from the offering were approximately $25.6 million after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applicable to interim financial information. Accordingly, certain information normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) has been condensed and/or omitted. For further information, please refer to the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s results for the periods presented. Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain minor reclassifications have been made to the prior year period amounts to conform to the current presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements 

In May 2014 (amended January 2017), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition model, Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers which created a new Topic 606 (“ASC 606”). The guidance is intended to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP applicable to revenue transactions. Existing industry guidance was eliminated, including revenue recognition guidance specific to the gaming industry. The Company adopted the standard as of January 1, 2018, following the full retrospective approach. The accompanying financial statements and related disclosures reflect the effects of the new revenue standard. The most significant impacts of the adoption are summarized in Note 2, Revenue Recognition .

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases , which replaces the existing guidance. ASU 2016-02 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee would account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The

4

Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures and while the income statement is not expected to be materially impacted, the Company expects the balance she et to be materially impacted as more leases will be capitalized.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows, which reduced the diversity on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations , which clarified the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. The standard became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation , which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. ASU 2017-09 provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting. The standard became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

No other recently issued accounting standards that are not yet effective have been identified that management believes are likely to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 2 – Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from contracts with customers primarily consists of casino wagers, room sales, food and beverage transactions, rental income from the Company’s retail tenants and entertainment sales. These contracts can be written, oral or implied by customary business practices.

Casino gaming revenues are the aggregate of gaming wins and losses. The commissions rebated to premium players for cash discounts and other cash incentives to patrons related to gaming play are recorded as a reduction to casino gaming revenues. Gaming contracts include a performance obligation to honor the patron’s wager and typically include a performance obligation to provide a product or service to the patron on a complimentary basis to incentivize gaming or in exchange for points earned under the Company’s loyalty programs.

The Company generally enters into three types of slot and amusement device placement contracts as part of its distributed gaming business: space agreements, revenue share and participation agreements. Under space agreements, the Company pays a fixed monthly rental fee for the right to install, maintain and operate the Company’s slots at a business location. Under these agreements, the Company recognizes all gaming revenue and records fixed monthly rental fees as gaming expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. Under revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the gaming revenue generated from the Company’s slots placed at the location. With regard to both space and revenue share agreements, the Company holds the applicable gaming license to conduct gaming at the location (although revenue share locations are required to obtain separate regulatory approval to receive a percentage of the gaming revenue). Under participation agreements, the business location holds the applicable gaming license and retains a percentage of the gaming revenue that it generates from the Company’s slots. In Montana, the Company’s slot and amusement device placement contracts are all revenue share agreements. In its distributed gaming business, the Company considers its customer to be the gaming player since the Company controls all aspects of the slot machines. Due to the maintaining of control of the services directly before they are transferred to the customer, the Company is considered to be the principal in these transactions and therefore records revenue on a gross basis.  

For wagering contracts that include complimentary products and services provided by the Company to incentivize gaming, the Company allocates the stand-alone selling price of each product and service to the respective revenue type. Complimentary products or services provided under the Company's control and discretion, that are supplied by third parties, are recorded as an operating expense.

For wagering contracts that include products and services provided to a patron in exchange for points earned under the Company’s loyalty programs, Golden Rewards®, ace|PLAY®, Gold Mine Rewards ^TM and Rocky Gap Rewards Club ^TM , the Company allocates the estimated stand-alone selling price of the points earned to the loyalty program liability. The loyalty program liability is a deferral of revenue until redemption occurs under ASC 606. Upon redemption of loyalty program points for Company-owned products and services, the stand-alone selling price of each product or service is allocated to the respective revenue type. For redemptions of points with third parties, the redemption amount is deducted from the loyalty program liability and paid directly to the third party. Any discounts received by the Company from the third party in connection with this transaction are recorded to other revenue.

5

After allocation to the other revenue types for products and services provided to patrons as part of a wagering contract, the residual amount is recorded to casino gaming revenue as soon as the wager is settled. As all wagers have similar characte ristics, the Company accounts for its gaming contracts collectively on a portfolio basis versus an individual basis.

Revenue from leases is primarily recorded to other revenues and is generated from base rents through long-term leases with retail tenants. Base rent, adjusted for contractual escalations, is recognized on a straight-lined basis over the term of the related lease. Overage rent is paid by a tenant when its sales exceed an agreed upon minimum amount and is not recognized by the Company until the threshold is met.

Food, beverage and retail revenues are recorded at the time of sale. Room revenue is recorded at the time of occupancy. Sales taxes and surcharges collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis.

Contract and Contract Related Liabilities

The Company provides numerous products and services to its customers. There is often a timing difference between the cash payment by the customers and recognition of revenue for each of the associated performance obligations. The Company has the following main types of gaming liabilities associated with contracts with gaming customers: (1) outstanding chip liability, and (2) loyalty program liabilities.

The outstanding chip liability represents the collective amounts owed to patrons in exchange for gaming chips in their possession. Outstanding chips are expected to be recognized as revenue or redeemed for cash within one year of being purchased. The loyalty program liabilities represent a deferral of revenue until patron redemption of points earned. The loyalty program points are expected to be redeemed and recognized as revenue within one year of being earned. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the amount of gaming liabilities was $12.6 million and $12.2 million, respectively.

Customer deposits and other deferred revenue represent cash deposits made by customers for future non-gaming services to be provided by the Company. With the exception of tenant deposits, which are tied to the terms of the lease and typically extend beyond a year, the majority of these customer deposits and other deferred revenue are expected to be recognized as revenue or refunded to the customer within one year of the date the deposit was recorded.

Significant Impacts of Adoption of ASC 606

The adoption of ASC 606 principally affected the presentation of promotional allowances and how the Company measured the liability associated with its loyalty programs. The promotional allowances line item was eliminated from the consolidated statement of operations with amounts being deducted from the respective revenue line items, and the cost of providing such complimentaries is no longer included in gaming expense. Additionally, the valuation of points associated with the Company’s loyalty programs was changed from cost to fair value, with the Company recording an increase to the loyalty point liability.

Furthermore, as a result of the adoption of the new standard, certain adjustments and other reclassifications to and between revenue categories and to and between expense categories were required; however, the amounts associated with such adjustments did not have a significant impact on the Company’s previously reported operating income or net income.

The Company elected to adopt the full retrospective method to apply the new guidance to each prior reporting period presented as if it had been in effect since January 1, 2015, with a pre-tax cumulative effect of the adoption recognized as a decrease in retained earnings of $1.1 million on January 1, 2017, related to its loyalty program point liability.

Adoption of the new standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s previously reported net revenues, expenses, operating income, and net income. The impact of adoption of the new standard to previously reported selected financial statement information was as follows:

Note 3 – Acquisition

Overview

On October 20, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding equity interests of American for aggregate consideration of $787.6 million in cash (after giving effect to post-closing adjustments) and the issuance by the Company of approximately 4.0 million shares of its common stock to W2007/ACEP Holdings, LLC (“ACEP Holdings”), a former American

6

equity holder. The fair value of the Company’s common stock issued to ACEP Holdings was $101.5 million, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on October 20, 2017 of $25.08 per share .

Acquisition Method of Accounting

The American Acquisition has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Under ASC 805, the purchase price of the acquisition is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The Company has allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on preliminary estimates of their fair values as determined by the Company based on its judgment with assistance from preliminary third party appraisals. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill. During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with a corresponding offset to goodwill and will allocate goodwill to each of the business segments at the conclusion of the measurement period. The determination of the fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (and the related determination of estimated lives of depreciable tangible and identifiable intangible assets) requires significant judgment. The Company has not yet completed its valuation analysis and calculations in sufficient detail necessary to finalize the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, along with the related allocations of goodwill and intangible assets. The final fair value determinations are expected to be completed no later than the fourth quarter of 2018. The final fair value determinations may be significantly different than those reflected in the consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Pro Forma Combined Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information has been prepared by management for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the results of operations, financial condition or other financial information of the Company would have been if the American Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2016, or what such results or financial condition will be for any future periods. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is based on preliminary estimates and assumptions and on the information available at the time of the preparation thereof. These preliminary estimates and assumptions may change, be revised or prove to be materially different, and the estimates and assumptions may not be representative of facts existing at the time of the American Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information does not reflect non-recurring charges that will be incurred in connection with the American Acquisition, nor any cost savings and synergies expected to result from the American Acquisition (and associated costs to achieve such savings or synergies), nor any costs associated with severance, restructuring or integration activities resulting from the American Acquisition.

The following table summarizes certain unaudited pro forma combined financial information derived from a combination of the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and of American for the three months ended March 31 2017, adjusted to give effect to the American Acquisition, related transactions (including the refinancing), and the adoption of ASC 606.

7

Depreciation expense for property and equipment, including capital leases, was $20.8 million and $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

As of March 31, 2018, the Company’s senior secured credit facilities consisted of a $900 million senior secured first lien credit facility (consisting of $800 million in term loans and a $100 million revolving credit facility) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as administrative agent and collateral agent), the lenders party thereto and the other entities party thereto (the “First Lien Facility”), and a $200 million senior secured second lien term loan facility with Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (as administrative agent and collateral agent), the lenders party thereto and the other entities party thereto (the “Second Lien Term Loan” and, together with the First Lien Facility, the “Credit Facilities”).

As of March 31, 2018, $798 million and $200 million of term loan borrowings were outstanding under the Company’s First Lien Facility and Second Lien Term Loan, respectively, there were no letters of credit outstanding under the First Lien Facility, and the Company’s revolving credit facility was undrawn, leaving borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2018 of $100 million.

8

As of March 31, 2018, the weighted-average effective interest rate on the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facilities was approximately 5.4%.

The revolving credit facility under the First Lien Facility matures on October 20, 2022, and the term loans under the First Lien Facility mature on October 20, 2024. The term loan under the First Lien Facility must be repaid in 27 quarterly installments of $2 million each, which commenced in March 2018, followed by a final installment of $746 million at maturity. The term loans under the Second Lien Term Loan must be repaid in full at maturity on October 20, 2025.

The Company was in compliance with its financial covenants under the Credit Facilities as of March 31, 2018.

Note 7 – Stock Incentive Plans and Share-Based Compensation

As of March 31, 2018, 861,460 shares of the Company’s common stock were available for grants of awards under the Company’s 2015 Incentive Award Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which includes the annual increase in the number of shares available for grant on January 1, 2018 of 1,056,505 shares.

The 2015 Plan provides that no stock option or stock appreciation right (even if vested) may be exercised prior to the earlier of August 1, 2018 or immediately prior to the consummation of a change in control of the Company that would result in an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Share-based compensation expense related to stock options was $1.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company’s unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options was approximately $11.4 million as of March 31, 2018, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

Restricted Stock Units and Performance Stock Units

On March 14, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved a new long-term incentive structure for equity awards to be granted to the executive officers of the Company under the 2015 Plan. Under this new structure, commencing in the first quarter of 2018, the executive officers of the Company receive long-term equity awards in a combination of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”). The number of PSUs that will be eligible to vest will be determined based on the Company’s attainment of performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. Following the two-year performance period, the number of “vesting eligible” PSUs will then be subject to one additional year of time-based vesting. Share-based compensation costs related to RSU and PSU awards are calculated based on the market price on the date of the grant.

The following table summarizes the Company’s RSU and PSU activity:

9

Outstanding PSUs as of December 31, 2017 were combined with the RSUs in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC.

Share-based compensation expense related to RSUs was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Share-based compensation expense related to PSUs was $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and none during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

As of March 31, 2018, there was $5.7 million and $4.7 million of unamortized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs and PSUs, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years for RSUs and 3.2 years for PSUs.

Note 8 – Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate was 23.7% and (46.4)% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Income tax expense was $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, which was attributed primarily to financial reporting expenditures that are not deductible for tax purposes. Income tax benefit was $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, which was attributed primarily to a partial release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

Deferred tax assets are evaluated by considering historical levels of income, estimates of future taxable income and the impact of tax planning strategies. The Company continues to evaluate its deferred tax asset valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. The Company concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable net operating loss carry-forward periods to realize a portion of its deferred tax assets.

The Company’s income taxes payable was $0.6 million as of March 31, 2018, and its income taxes receivable was $0.2 million as of December 31, 2017.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $65.7 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) which will begin to expire in 2032. These NOLs have the potential to be used to offset future ordinary taxable income and reduce future cash tax liabilities. However, in connection with the American Acquisition, the Company issued approximately 4.0 million shares of its common stock to ACEP Holdings, which resulted in an “ownership change” under Section 382 that will generally limit the amount of NOLs the Company can utilize annually. Following an “ownership change” under Section 382, the amount of NOLs the Company can utilize in a given year is limited to an amount equal to the aggregate fair market value of the Company’s common stock immediately prior to the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term exempt interest rate in effect for the month of the ownership change. The Company estimates that it will be able to utilize approximately $10.8 million of NOLs annually.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate income tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Tax Act; however, in certain cases, as described below, the Company has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances. For any amounts the Company has not been able to make a reasonable estimate, it will continue to account for those items based on its existing accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes, and the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to enactment. In all cases, the Company will continue to make and refine its calculations as additional analysis is completed. In addition, the Company’s estimates may also be affected as it gains a more thorough understanding of the Tax Act.

Given the significance of the legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 118 (SAB 118), which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period” similar to that used when accounting for business combinations. However, the measurement period is deemed to have ended earlier when the registrant has obtained, prepared, and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting. During the measurement period, impacts of the law are expected to be recorded at the time a reasonable estimate for all or a portion of the effects can be made, and provisional amounts can be recognized and adjusted as information becomes available, prepared, or analyzed. SAB 118 summarizes a three-step process to be applied at each reporting period to account for and qualitatively disclose: (1) the effects of the change in tax law for which accounting is complete; (2) provisional amounts (or adjustments to provisional amounts) for the effects of the tax law where accounting is not complete, but that a reasonable estimate has been determined; and (3) a reasonable estimate cannot yet be made and therefore taxes are reflected in accordance with law prior to the enactment of the Tax Act.

10

Several provisions of t he Tax A ct have significant impact on the Company’s U.S. tax attributes, generally consisting of credits and loss carry-forwards. Although the Company has made a reasonable estimate of the gross amounts of the attributes disclosed, the Company is continuin g to analyze certain aspects of the Tax Act and is refining its calculations which could potentially affect the measurements of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts.

Note 9 – Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Estimates of fair value for financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. The framework defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The framework discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The framework utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Thus, assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 may be measured at fair value using inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). Management's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, short-term borrowings and accrued and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the short duration of these financial instruments. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximated the carrying value because the terms were recently negotiated and based upon the Company’s expected borrowing rate for debt with similar remaining maturities and comparable risk.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to an annual assessment for impairment during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if there are indications of possible impairment, by applying a fair-value-based test.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company had one derivative instrument outstanding from which the Company will receive cash payments at the end of each period in which the interest rate exceeds the agreed upon strike price (the “Interest Rate Cap”), with a notional amount of $650 million, which expires on December 31, 2020. Using Level 2 inputs, the Company adjusts the carrying value of its Interest Rate Cap derivative to estimate fair value quarterly. The fair value of the Company’s asset under its Interest Rate Cap is based upon observable market-based inputs that reflect the present values of the difference between estimated future fixed rate payments and future variable receipts. Fair value of the Company’s Interest Rate Cap at March 31, 2018 was $6.5 million. As the Company elected to not apply hedge accounting, the change in fair value of this Interest Rate Cap was recorded on the consolidated statement of operations.

Note 10 – Leases

Rental Income

The Company recorded rental revenue of $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and a de minmis amount for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Rent Expense

The Company leases its branded tavern locations, office headquarters building, land, equipment and vehicles under noncancelable operating leases that are not subject to contingent rents.

Slot placement contracts in the form of space agreements are also accounted for as operating leases. Under space agreements, the Company pays fixed monthly rental fees for the right to install, maintain and operate its slots at business locations, which are recorded in gaming expenses. The Company leases one of its tavern locations and its office headquarters building from a related party. See Note 13, Related Party Transactions, for more detail. Other operating leases include an operating ground lease with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources for approximately 270 acres in the Rocky Gap State Park on which Rocky Gap is situated, and leases of four parcels of land in Pahrump, Nevada, on which the Company’s Gold Town Casino is located.

11

Operating lease rental ex pense associated with all operating leases, which is calculated on a straight-line basis, is as follows:

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies

Participation and Revenue Share Agreements

In addition to the space lease agreements described above in Note 10, Leases , the Company also enters into slot placement contracts in the form of revenue share and participation agreements. Under revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the gaming revenue generated from the Company’s slots placed at the location, rather than a fixed monthly rental fee. Under participation agreements, the business location holds the applicable gaming license and retains a percentage of the gaming revenue that it generates from the Company’s slots. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the aggregate contingent payments recognized by the Company as gaming expenses under revenue share and participation agreements were $37.1 million, including $0.2 million under revenue share and participation agreements with related parties, as described in Note 13,  Related Party Transactions . During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the aggregate contingent payments recognized by the Company as gaming expenses under revenue share and participation agreements were $34.8 million, including   $0.3 million under revenue share and participation agreements with related parties .

The Company also enters into amusement device and ATM placement contracts in the form of revenue share agreements. Under these revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the non-gaming revenue generated from the Company’s amusement devices and ATMs placed at the location. During each of the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company as other operating expenses for amusement devices and ATMs under such agreements were $0.4 million.

Miscellaneous Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company is involved in a variety of lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings concerning labor and employment matters, personal injury claims, breach of contract claims, commercial disputes, business practices, intellectual property, tax and other matters for which the Company has recorded reserves of $1.5 million for claims as of the date of this filing. Although lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its currently pending matters should not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, legal proceedings can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and adversely affect the Co mpany’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in a particular period.

In February and April 2017, several former employees filed two separate purported class action lawsuits against the Company in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, and on behalf of similarly situated individuals employed by the Company in the State of Nevada. The lawsuits allege that the Company violated certain Nevada labor laws including payment of an hourly wage below the statutory minimum wage without providing a qualified health insurance plan and an associated failure to pay proper overtime compensation. The complaints seek, on behalf of the plaintiffs and members of the putative class, an unspecified amount of damages (including punitive damages), injunctive and equitable relief, and an award of attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. In the second half of 2017, the Company agreed to settle the first of these two cases, subject to court approval. The second case is in the discovery phase.

In February 2018, a prior guest of the Stratosphere filed a purported class action complaint against the Company in the United States District Court, District of Nevada, on behalf of similarly situated individuals and entities that paid the Clark County Combined Transient Lodging Tax (“Tax”) on the portion of a resort fee that constitutes charges for Internet access, during the period of February 6, 2014 through the date the alleged conduct ceases. The lawsuit alleges that the Tax was charged in violation of the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which imposes a national moratorium on the taxation of Internet access by states and their political subdivisions, and seeks, on behalf of the plaintiff and the putative class, damages equal to the amount of the Tax collected on the Internet access component of the resort fee, injunctive relief, disgorgement, interest, fees and costs.  The Company has not yet been served with the complaint. In the event a complaint is served on the Company, it anticipates being accorded a stay to respond in connection with an agreement that other hotel casino operators have entered into with regard to case consolidation while the federal court reviews subject matter jurisdiction. This case is at an early stage in the proceedings, and the Company is therefore unable to make a reasonable estimate of the probable loss or range of losses, if any, that might arise from this matter.

12

While legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of any of the above matters, based on management’s current understanding of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Company believes that these proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 12 – Segment Information

The Company conducts its business through two reportable operating segments: Casinos and Distributed Gaming. The Company’s Casinos segment involves the ownership and operation of eight resort casino properties in Nevada and Maryland. The Company’s Distributed Gaming segment involves the installation, maintenance and operation of slots and amusement devices in certain strategic, high-traffic, non-casino locations (such as grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, bars, taverns and liquor stores) in Nevada and Montana, and the operation of wholly-owned branded taverns targeting local patrons located primarily in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area. The Corporate and Other segment includes the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, miscellaneous receivables and corporate overhead. Costs recorded in the Corporate and Other segment have not been allocated to the Company’s reportable operating segments because these costs are not easily allocable and to do so would not be practical.

Results of Operations - Segment Net Income (Loss), Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA

The Company evaluates each segment’s profitability based upon such segment’s Adjusted EBITDA, which represents each segment’s earnings before interest and other non-operating income (expense), income taxes, depreciation and amortization, preopening expense, acquisition expenses, class action litigation expenses, share-based compensation expenses, executive severance, gain/loss on disposal of property and equipment and other gains and losses, calculated before corporate overhead (which is not allocated to each segment).

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, certain operating data for the Company’s segments, and reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss):

13

Note 13 – Related Party Transactions

As of March 31, 2018, the Company leased its office headquarters building from a company 33% beneficially owned by Blake L. Sartini, 5% owned by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Sartini’s immediate family members (including Blake L. Sartini, II) for which Mr. Sartini serves as trustee, and 3% beneficially owned by Stephen A. Arcana. The rent expense for the office headquarters building was $0.3 million during each of the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, and there was $0.1 million owed by the Company with respect to such lease as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Additionally, a portion of the office headquarters building was sublet to a company owned or controlled by Mr. Sartini. There was less than $0.1 million of rental income for each of the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, and no amounts were owed to the Company at March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017. Mr. Sartini serves as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and is co-trustee of the Sartini Trust, which is a significant shareholder of the Company. Mr. Arcana serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company leased one tavern location from a trust controlled by Mr. Sartini through a trust for the benefit of Mr. Sartini’s immediate family members (including Blake L. Sartini, II) for which Mr. Sartini serves as trustee. In addition, a second tavern location that the Company had previously leased from related parties was sold in January 2018 to an unrelated third party. The rent expense for tavern locations leased from related parties (including sold tavern locations for the periods in which the leases were with related parties) was $0.1 million and $0.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and there were no amounts owed by the Company with respect to such leases as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

During each of the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company paid less than $0.1 million under aircraft timesharing agreements between the Company and Sartini Enterprises, Inc. a company controlled by Mr. Sartini. There was less than $0.1 million owed by the Company under the aircraft timesharing agreements as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 .

During the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded revenues of $0.3 million in each period and the Company recorded gaming expenses of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to the use of the Company’s slots at a distributed gaming location owned in part by Sean T. Higgins, who serves as the Company’s Executive Vice President of Compliance and Governmental Affairs and Chief Legal Officer.    De minimis amounts were owed to the Company and were due and payable by the Company related to this arrangement as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 .

During each of the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, Company recorded selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses of less than $0.1 million related to a three-year consulting agreement between the Company and Lyle A. Berman, who serves

14

on the Board of Directors of the Company. Less than $0.1 million was due and payable by the Company as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 related to this agreement . The consulting agreement expires on July 31, 2018.